Loading...
2010.11.30 CC Agenda Packet                 AGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds NOVEMBER 30, 2010                 5:00 p.m. - Meeting with candidates for appointment to the position of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director. 6:30 p.m. - Executive session regarding labor negotiation strategy. 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute   1.Approval of Agenda   2.Approval of Consent Agenda Items   A.Roll Call   B. AM-3551 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010.   C. AM-3549 Approval of claim checks #122358 through #122513 dated November 18, 2010 for $415,757.40.  Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #49951 through #49980 for the period November 1, 2010 through November 15, 2010 for $635,158.60.   D. AM-3557 Confirm appointment of Tom Walker to the Architectural Design Board.   E. AM-3554 Adoption of Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code requiring that interior lot lines not overlap PRD perimeter buffers.   3. (5 Minutes) AM-3552 Community Service Announcement: Residential energy conservation measures.   4.Audience Comments  (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings. Packet Page 1 of 145   5. (15 Minutes) AM-3556 Discussion and potential action on a proposed Draft City of Edmonds 2011 State Legislative Agenda.   6. (15 Minutes) AM-3555 Discussion and potential action on the final ordinance amending the 2009-2010 Budget.   7. (10 Minutes) AM-3545 Discussion regarding pay off of City Hall bonds.   8. (5 Minutes) AM-3546 Discussion regarding paying Anderson Center bond from Fund 125 (REET).   9. (5 Minutes) AM-3550 Discussion and recommendation to fund Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Foundation request for funding for 2010 4th of July festivities.   10. (90 Minutes) AM-3553 Presentation of written proposed budget amendments.   11. (15 Minutes) Council reports on outside committee/board meetings.   12. (5 Minutes) Mayor's Comments   13. (15 Minutes) Council Comments   Adjourn   Packet Page 2 of 145 AM-3551   Item #: 2. B. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:Consent   Submitted By:Sandy Chase Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type:Action  Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 16, 2010. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Attachments 11-16-10 Draft City Council Minutes Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 11/18/2010 01:29 PM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 3 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES November 16, 2010 At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Cooper announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding pending threatened and potential litigation, and real estate negotiations. He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 45 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Cooper, and Councilmembers Bernheim, Plunkett, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Peterson, Petso and Wilson. Councilmember Wilson left the executive session at 6:35 p.m. Others present were City Attorney Scott Snyder, Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton, and City Clerk Sandy Chase. At 6:45, Ms. Chase announced to the public present in the Council Chambers that an additional 10 minutes would be required in executive session. The executive session concluded at 6:54 p.m. At 6:55 p.m., the City Council met with Architectural Design Board (ADB) candidate Tom Walker. The meeting took place in the Council Chambers, located in the Public Safety Complex. All City Council members were present for the meeting with Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker was advised by Council President Bernheim that action regarding his appointment to the ADB would occur at the next City Council meeting. The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor Cooper in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Cooper, Mayor Steve Bernheim, Council President D. J. Wilson, Councilmember Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Strom Peterson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Peter Gibson, Student Representative STAFF PRESENT Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director Phil Williams, Public Works Director Lorenzo Hines, Finance Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Carl Nelson, CIO Leonard Yarberry, Building Official Debi Humann, Human Resources Director Rob English, City Engineer Kernen Lien, Associated Planner Michael Clugston Planner Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Council President Bernheim requested the addition of a Resolution Authorizing Defense and Indemnity Pursuant to Chapter 2.06 as Item 11a. Packet Page 4 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 2 COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Wilson requested Items G and K be removed from the Consent Agenda and Council President Bernheim requested Item E be removed. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 1, 2010. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #122136 THROUGH #122275 DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2010 FOR $333,645.30, AND CLAIM CHECKS #122276 THROUGH #122357 DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2010 FOR $143,710.56. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #49917 THROUGH #49950 FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 16, 2010 THROUGH OCTOBER 31, 2010 FOR $643,574.73. D. ACCEPTANCE OF WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD OCTOBER 2010 LIST OF BUSINESSES RENEWING LIQUOR LICENSES. F. 2011 CONTRACT FOR EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SR. EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. H. AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE ALDERWOOD INTERTIE AND RESERVOIR UPGRADE PROJECT. I. AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE 2010 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT. J. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MURRAY, SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR UPDATING THE CITY'S WATER SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. L. ORDINANCE NO. 3817 – AMENDING THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY REPEALING AND REENACTING THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 20, TO WIT, CHAPTER 20.01, TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMITS; CHAPTER 20.02 TYPE I - IV, DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS; CHAPTER 20.03, PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS; CHAPTER 20.04, CONSISTENCY WITH DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SEPA; CHAPTER 20.06, OPEN RECORD PUBLIC HEARINGS; CHAPTER 20.07, CLOSED RECORD APPEALS; AND CHAPTER 20.08, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS; ARE HEREBY AMENDED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THE REINSERTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS AN APPEAL BODY AND MAKING TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. M. ORDINANCE NO. 3818 – AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY REPEALING AND REENACTING CHAPTER 20.15A RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEPA), AMENDING CHAPTER 20.03 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS, TO ADD A NEW SECTION RELATING TO SEPA NOTICING REQUIREMENTS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. Packet Page 5 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 3 ITEM E: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SNOCOM INTERNET ACCESS. Council President Bernheim requested the final version reflect correction of a typographical error. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM G: APPROVE CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CITY OF EDMONDS PROSECUTOR. Councilmember Wilson relayed his disappointment that the Prosecutor chose not to bring charges against anyone with regard to the tree removed on City property at 3rd & Walnut. Until the Prosecutor explains to him why that was done, he would not support the professional services contract. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Wilson that something more should have been done with regard to removal of the tree at 3rd & Walnut. She did not support approval of the professional services contract. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE ITEM G. Council President Bernheim commented on the need to keep the Prosecutor’s contract in place. He was satisfied with pursuing a civil remedy with regard to the tree removed at 3rd & Walnut. Student Representative Gibson inquired about the contract start date of November 10, 2010. Mayor Cooper explained the Prosecutor has an ongoing contract with the City. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO. ITEM K: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DISTRICT Councilmember Wilson explained he pulled this item in order to vote no. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM, TO APPROVE ITEM K. Councilmember Peterson explained the Snohomish Conservation District has a great knowledge base related to water quality and water conservation. This item was reviewed by the Community Services/ Development Services Committee last week. The Interlocal Agreement is a $5,000 contract that is not spent unless the City requires their expertise. The Agreement will allow the City to access their expertise, knowledge and background in stormwater remediation issues that the City does not have in-house. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked Councilmember Wilson why he planned to vote no. Councilmember Wilson responded the contract was up to $7500 and would not be spent unless their expertise was needed, funded by the Stormwater Utility. This would be the fifth such contact the Council has signed in the past 2-3 years with an environmental entity; the city has a contract with Cascade Land Conservancy, Sustainable Edmonds, University of Washington (planning for Five Corners), and Climate Solutions. He was not opposed to the work that could be done but he had prioritized expenditures with the other four organizations. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the Interlocal Agreement. She recalled the Snohomish Conservation District spoke to the Port of Edmonds and she was impressed with their knowledge. Packet Page 6 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 4 Mayor Cooper explained the Snohomish Conservation District is a government agency through Snohomish County that is established by the State; they are not a non-profit environmental group. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER WILSON VOTING NO. 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIRING THAT INTERIOR LOT LINES NOT OVERLAP PRD PERIMETER BUFFERS. Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the proposed changes would revise the Planned Residential Development (PRD) Code to clarify that lot lines within a PRD cannot overlap the perimeter buffer. Mayor Cooper opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented the proposed ordinance appeared to provide safeguards that Councilmember Petso was interested in. He asked Councilmember Petso and Council President Bernheim whether any further corrections to the language in the ordinance were needed. He relayed the Planning Board’s comments that PRDs soon were be removed from the ordinance. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Cooper closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. In response to Mr. Hertrich’s question whether the language was sufficient to clarify that the PFD buffer should be separate from the backyard and side yard setbacks of lots on the exterior of a PRD, Councilmember Petso requested staff return with an ordinance next week that clarifies the intent that the perimeter buffers be separate and distinct from the rear lots and setback areas of lots in a PRD. City Attorney Scott Snyder observed Councilmember Petso’s concern was with the first sentence of subsection 20.35.050(C)(2) : “Provide a landscape buffer, open space or passive use recreational area of a depth from the inner boundaries of exterior property line setbacks at least equal to the depth of the rear yard setback applicable to the zone.” He suggested dividing the sentence into three simple, declarative sentences. Council President Bernheim commented this was an interim ordinance that had been extended. He was hopeful the ordinance could be adopted soon implementing the will of the Council. Mr. Snyder commented during the time the interim ordinance had been in place, this was the first time that sentence had been questioned. Council President Bernheim commented the intent of the interim ordinance was to remove ambiguity. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO BRING BACK AN ORDINANCE NEXT WEEK FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLERS. Councilmember Wilson explained the Public Safety Committee has discussed this matter at five meetings in an effort to give every opportunity for interested parties to provide input. Discussion has become quite theatrical at those meetings, a demonstration he hoped to avoid at the Council level. The recommendation from the Public Safety Committee is for the Council to consider a requirement for fire sprinkler systems in single family residences 5,000 square feet or greater, or single family residences 3,000 square feet or greater. The Committee expressly stated fire sprinklers should not be required for all houses/units, establishing a threshold of zero square feet. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained the Committee discussed adding a requirement for fire sprinklers at the time of remodeling and determined that would not be appropriate at this time. Packet Page 7 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 5 Councilmember Wilson explained the Committee invited representatives from the firefighters union, fire leadership, carpenters, Snohomish County Council, water districts, realtors, Master Builders, etc. One of the former leaders of the Master Buildings, also an Edmonds resident, said in his view the 5,000 square foot threshold would be reasonable because so few houses of that size were built. He highlighted changes made to the proposed ordinance, 1) offset the cost of increased capacity, and 2) include in the Whereas clause that it was the Council’s intent not to bring this back until 2013 or the next International Fire Code update. He acknowledged this Council or a future Council could overturn that direction. Fire District 1 Fire Marshal John Westfall reviewed the evolution of fire sprinklers:  Over 100 years of industrial and commercial building and occupant protection  Residential designs since 1973 optimize and economize sprinklers to better protect occupants and reduce costs  Apartment sprinklers in 1988  Dwelling sprinklers in 2009 He explained the 2009 International Residential Code mandates residential fire sprinkler systems (RFSS). Washington State directed each city and county to make a local decision. Since April RFSS stakeholders including Fire District, Building Departments, local builders, water purveyors, sprinkler installers and testers, realtors, insurance agents, Public Safety Committee, and the public have been meeting to reach agreement in the interest of public safety. Benefits of home sprinklers include: • Save lives • Reduce injuries • Save millions in property loss • Sustain resources for extinguishment and re-construction • Reduce homeowner insurance rates • Preserve affordable housing • Take advantage of required systems Nationally, single family dwellings present a higher risk both to occupants and responders. He provided statistics regarding fire death and injuries in one and two-family dwellings (percentage of residential):  Fire deaths: 84%  Fire Injuries 75%  Fire property damage 85%  Firefighter deaths: 85% Statistics show the most susceptible to casualty are children under the age of 10 and seniors over the age of 70. Washington State Fire Marshal reports 23 fatalities in single-family homes for 2009. The City of Edmonds has had 1 fatality in a single-family home since 2000. A smoke alarm alone is not enough. Sprinklers can keep a dwelling tenable, providing time to escape and keep the fire in check until the fire responders arrive. Installing both smoke alarms and a fire sprinkler system reduces the risk of death in a home to fire by 82%, relative to having neither. Home fire sprinklers reduce property loss: • Can contain and may even extinguish a fire in less time than it would take the fire department to arrive on the scene. • Records show $3.8M loss in dwellings in the Edmonds-Esperance-Woodway area from 2005-first quarter 2010 Home fire sprinklers reduce water damage: Packet Page 8 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 6 • Only the sprinkler closest to the fire will activate, spraying water directly on the fire • 90% of fires are contained by the operation of just 1 sprinkler • 14 gallons per minute vs. 250 gallons per minute. In 10 minutes: 140 gallons vs. 2500 gallons Fire Marshal Westfall relayed home fire sprinkler costs: • Nationally accepted cost average is $1.61 per square foot in new construction in a report developed by the National Fire Protection Association. The National Master Builders Association agrees with this average. • A local installer, Robinson Plumbing, estimates most installations in $1.25-$1.50 per square foot • Variation of water connection charges can elevate system costs but these costs may be already required for domestic use when a home is constructed He explaining more water is required for RFSS so the meter is upsized from ¾ inch to 1 inch. Water departments often increase the water connection charge (WCC)/general facilities charge (GFC) to accommodate the larger meter even though the larger meter is only used if the RFSS is activated. Public Works Director Phil Williams suggested the City not charge the upsized WCC when the upsize is due to the requirement for RFSS (an additional $2000). He reviewed sprinkler costs for 5,000 square feet: Edmonds Olympic View RFSS ($1.25) $ 6250 $ 6250 Related to sprinklers Permits (10%) 625 625 Related to sprinklers WCC / GFC 908 3580 Already required Line/meter (1”) 800 1160 Already required Total $ 8593 $ 11615 He reviewed sprinkler costs for 3,000 square feet: Edmonds Olympic View RFSS ($1.50) $ 4500 $ 4500 Related to sprinklers Permits (10%) 450 450 Related to sprinklers WCC 908 3580 Already required Line/meter (1”) 800 1160 Already required Total $ 6658 $ 9690 Fire Marshal Westfall explained RFSS are aligned with Green Construction objectives to reduce energy usage and greenhouse gases: • Extend usable life and investment of homes • Preserve belongings • Reduce hazardous waste and toxic emissions from fire • Reduce construction debris & waste after fire • Reduce carbon emissions from fire department and construction equipment during reconstruction He relayed examples of homeowner insurance savings, pointing out standard installation does not include sprinklers in the garage or crawlspace: • State Farm Kelly Meldrum @ 5 Corners anticipated a 5% savings for installation standard. 10% for design protection beyond standard. • McDonald McGarry Insurance on Main anticipated a 4-5% savings for installation standard. 7- 10% for design protection beyond standard Ordinances will accommodate affordable housing. The 3,000 or 5,000 thresholds allow for construction of unsprinklered homes that would be more affordable. The ordinance is written in a middle ground. The gap from 0-2999 square feet is provided, not because lives in smaller homes have a lesser value but as a Packet Page 9 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 7 compromise among stakeholders to improve fire protection in the community. RFSS take advantage of required systems; dwellings require water for sanitation. Having the dwelling plumbed to the ceiling makes it available to protect the environment, property, family and lives. He summarized:  RFSS required for new construction only  Fire Area: 3,000 square feet vs. 5,000 square feet  Water connection charge reduction  Staff will not return with new threshold proposal until the 2012 code cycle (July 2013) Council President Bernheim asked the basis for establishing a threshold versus simply requiring or not requiring RFSS in all new construction. Fire Marshal Westfall responded the threshold was a compromise among stakeholders; fire personnel go to the extreme for public safety, builders go to the extreme for development. Council President Bernheim asked if there was a relationship between the size of a building and the safety afforded by a sprinkler system. Fire Marshal Westfall agreed the larger a building is, the more challenging it is for fire responders to extinguish a fire – a larger building has more area, more contents and more places for people to be found. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the number of 5,000 square foot homes built in Edmonds in the last 3-4 years, noting one 5,000 square foot home was being constructed now that includes sprinklers. Building Official Leonard Yarberry advised from 2007 – September 2010, five 5,000 square foot homes were constructed and thirty-two 3,000 square foot homes. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas inquired about other cities’ requirements with regard to RFSS. Fire Marshal Westfall answered Kenmore recently adopted a zero threshold fire sprinkler requirement; they previously had a 5,000 square foot threshold. In Zone 1 Departments, Shoreline has a 5,000 square foot threshold, Kirkland has a 6,000 square foot threshold, and Redmond has a zero threshold. In Snohomish County, Mountlake Terrace approved a 4,000 square foot threshold for new construction and Brier approved a 5,000 square foot threshold for new construction and remodels. Councilmember Petso observed facility fees are required to be equitable and cost based. She asked whether reducing the WCC was legal. City Attorney Scott Snyder responded fees were intended to be a cost for service and based on the cost for providing the service. The Council can waive fees but cannot levy a fee that exceeds the cost to process an application. Councilmember Petso asked whether waiving the fee was an illegal gift of public funds. Mr. Snyder used the example of the reduction/waiver of the application fee for murals due to the general public benefit. Mr. Williams explained Bremerton also offers the lower connection fee. He explained a 1-inch meter provides 3 times as much water as a ¾ inch meter thus the GFC is 3 times larger. The fee is viewed as a demand charge; a person with a house large enough to have enough bathrooms, irrigation, etc. to require a 1-inch meter, place more demand on the system than smaller homes. In the case of RFSS, the larger meter is not related to ongoing demand but a life- safety issue that rarely would be used. Student Representative Gibson asked what activated a RFSS. Fire Marshal Westfall answered heat; 135- 165 degrees at the ceiling. Mr. Gibson asked who tested fire sprinklers. Fire Marshal Westfall responded in a residential system it is suggested the homeowner perform an annual flow test. In a standalone system, the device must be separated and tested. With newer flow-through systems, the water moves through continuously. Councilmember Peterson inquired about affordable housing. Fire Marshal Westfall responded a 3,000 or 5,000 square foot threshold would allow for affordable housing and address builders’ concerns. A 3,000 square foot threshold would allow homes up to 2,999 square feet to be constructed without a sprinkler system. Councilmember Peterson referred to reports that the average size of new homes is shrinking for Packet Page 10 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 8 the first time due to economics. If the Council approved a reduction in the connection charge, he asked whether a person constructing a 2,000 square foot home with sprinklers and the 1-inch meter could also take advantage of the lower connection charge. Fire Marshal Westfall responded the proposed ordinance amends the water connection charge section as well as the requirement for sprinklers in 3,000+ or 5,000+ square feet. The reduction in the water connection charge for an upsized meter would apply to any home constructed with a fire sprinkler. Mr. Yarberry agreed the reduced water connection charge would apply to any home installing a sprinkler system, explaining the ordinance does not reference square footage in the section regarding upsizing the meter. Mr. Williams explained the intent was for the waiver to apply only to the WCC/GFC; the customer would still pay the additional cost for the larger meter. He noted a flow-through system would be very expensive to add to an existing residential structure but is very affordable to install during construction. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented her career has been in social services which is related to people. She referred to information in the presentation that two people died in Edmonds as a result of house fires in the past ten years. She asked whether those deaths could have been prevented if the homes were sprinklered. Fire Marshal Westfall answered in the case of the death in January 2010 where a woman succumbed to smoke and gases; sprinklers would have saved her life. She had a smoke alarm but there was no battery. Her son has been a spokesperson for the Fire Department to encourage people to keep their smoke alarms operational. The previous death was a smoking in bed fire; the victim died and the fire went out. In that instance it is unlikely the flames would have activated a sprinkler system. Mayor Cooper opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Ryan McIrvin, Snohomish County-Camano Association of Realtors, thanked the City for their stakeholder outreach process, particularly the time devoted by Councilmember Wilson. Government works best when it works with the community to find solutions. He commended the attempts to reduce the cost by offsetting the general facilities charge. However, the members of the Association object to mandating RFSS. He questioned how many lives would have been saved via hardwired smoke detectors versus smoke detectors and fire sprinklers. He acknowledged fire sprinklers were an effective tool for extinguishing fires and the proposed thresholds were more acceptable than a general mandate because it offset affordability. He compared a requirement for fire sprinklers to requiring everyone wear a Kevlar vest to reduce the number of people who die from gunshot wounds or requiring five point seatbelts to reduce auto deaths. If the Council chose to implement the ordinance, the Association prefers the 5,000 square foot threshold. The Association fears the threshold will be lowered in the future. Mike Echelbarger, Edmonds, stated he became involved in this discussion when considering a remodel and requiring sprinklers for remodels was originally included in the ordinance. He pointed out requiring the installation of sprinklers during a remodel is horribly expensive. He agreed with requiring fire sprinklers in multi family dwellings but did not support requiring sprinklers in residential homes. He noted the newer generation of smoke detectors are hardwired and battery versus older smoke detectors that are simply battery operated. He referred to statistics provided by Fire Marshal Westfall of $3.8 million loss in the past five years or $650,000/year compared to the City’s total valuation. The two fire deaths would not have been prevented by this ordinance. He commented on the damage that sprinklers can do to photographs, artwork, books, etc. He questioned the need for sprinklers when smoke detectors were very effective. He questioned the cost estimate for fire sprinkler installation of 0.38/square foot. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the general facilities charge provides revenue to the City. He questioned whether requiring sprinklers would reduce the need for fire personnel. Steve Sherman, Fire District 1 Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal, commented considering stakeholders’ point of view places the Fire Marshal in a compromised position. He recalled at the first stakeholder Packet Page 11 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 9 meeting admitting to being an advocate for sprinklers. He supported adopting the model code with a zero threshold. He admired the team effort to consider the concerns of the stakeholders. Council President Bernheim commented the issue appeared to be cost versus benefit. He recognized the building code required fire sprinklers in new construction apartments and commercial buildings and questioned why fire sprinklers were not required in single family structures. Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal Sherman responded it was not a fire code requirement, it was a residential code requirement. Sprinkler protection was included in apartments and commercial structures via the International Building Code. When the International Residential Code (IRC) was established, it separated multi family and single family/duplexes. The recent adoption of the IRC at the national level requires sprinklers in all residential structures. The fire industry supports having the model code effective on a national level. In the real world, often a compromise is necessary that balances fire and builders wishes. If the fire industry is the only consideration, the Council should adopt a zero threshold. Gary Franz, Deputy Fire Chief, Graham Fire & Rescue, explained smoke detectors alert a person inside a home to the fact that a fire is in progress; it has no ability to change the outcome of the fire once it ignites. At a point in time, every fire will grow until water is applied with the limited exception of a fire that extinguishes due to lack of oxygen. Sprinkler systems provide the water source at 135 degrees at ceiling temperature; the lower levels are at a lower temperature. Sprinklers limit smoke and fire damage and people have an opportunity to escape. He recalled listening to a caller on a cell phone trapped in a bedroom while the smoke detector was activated who ultimately died. He summarized sprinklers provide an entirely different level of protection. He guaranteed anyone who had been in a fire would advocate for fire sprinklers. He offered to provide the Council the link to the independent study that provided a range of installation costs from $0.38 to $3.66/square foot. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled when he was on the Council in 1988, the Council passed a requirement for fire sprinklers in buildings with 5+ units. He supported fire sprinklers in higher density residential units due to the increased chance of loss of life in a fire. The question today is whether the goal is saving buildings or people, the Fire Department has indicated they are satisfied with a building burning as long as the people have been rescued. He anticipated the number of deaths due to the absence of smoke detectors was much higher and that lower income housing may have more smokers. Fire sprinklers add value to a building and lower costs over time. He pointed out most fires occur in older building which would not be sprinklered under the proposed ordinances and new buildings contain more fire protections even without sprinklers. He recommended the 5,000 square foot threshold and a reduction of fees/costs for anyone voluntarily installing fire sprinklers. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Cooper closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. In response to questions from Councilmember Plunkett, Mr. Echelbarger acknowledged he was a developer whose family has been constructing homes in Snohomish County for 40-50 years. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the infrastructure installed for a development would allow sprinklers to be installed on an individual basis. Mr. Echelbarger answered yes, explaining the infrastructure installed allows sprinklers to be or not be installed in an individual home. Councilmember Plunkett referred to the indication that the City Council would not revisit this issue for three years and asked whether the Council could reduce the threshold in the future. Mr. Snyder answered there was no legal restriction on reconsideration; it was a political statement, not a legal restriction. Councilmember Plunkett summarized this City Council or any future Council was under no obligation to adhere to that intent. Mr. Snyder agreed. Student Representative Gibson asked why the Council would not adopt a zero threshold. Councilmember Wilson commented his personal feeling was he would not want sprinklers in his home and thus had Packet Page 12 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 10 difficulty requiring it for the community; fire professionals have a different view. If the principle is saving lives, the threshold should be zero and sprinklers should be required in all existing homes. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented as a legislative body, the Council often places requirements on the community such as PRD regulations, homeless shelters, etc. Mr. Echelbarger provided a builder’s point of view and costs to the Public Safety Committee. She noted the person who died in a fire in January 2010 may not have died if there were sprinklers in her home. The most vulnerable are the disabled, seniors and children; people who may not be able exit a house quickly. She questioned what a life was worth; her son’s life was worth everything to her to protect him. This is a social issue and is more than cost. As a legislative body, it is the City Council’s responsibility to ensure the safety of the community. She recalled the opposition when smoke detectors were initially required; now that is the norm and she hoped fire sprinklers eventually would be the norm. The cost of adding fire sprinklers is low compared to saving someone’s life. Councilmember Wilson commented he did not find a compelling enough reason to adopt either ordinance. He agreed with the proposal to reduce the general facilities charge to incentivize the installation of fire sprinklers. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED TO ADOPT THE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 3819, STRIKING THE FOURTH WHEREAS THAT REFERENCES 5,000 SQUARE FEET AND STRIKING SECTIONS 1 AND 2 ON PAGE 2. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED TO PASS THE ORDINANCE AT THE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LEVEL. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3819 WITH A ZERO THRESHOLD, STRIKING THE 5,000 SQUARE FOOT LANGUAGE. Council President Bernheim was not persuaded regarding the value of a minimum threshold other than a fire could pose more danger in a large structure versus a small structure. He commented these are nationally established fire regulations and should not be left to consumer choice. Mr. Snyder clarified that by deleting the words “exceeding 5,000 square feet of fire area,” in Section C, the language that remains mirrors the model code. Councilmember Wilson explained the Public Safety Committee spent 7-8 hours considering the proposed ordinance. He acknowledged there are reasonable arguments that fire sprinklers should be required at some level but the Committee expressly did not support a zero threshold. He pointed out the Council has spent 15 minutes deliberating the issue and during the past hour, fire professionals have spent 40 minutes explaining how fire sprinklers save lives. The Council has not provided ample opportunity for objective rebuttal. If the Council wants to mandate a zero threshold, he suggested the Council take more time to educate themselves and not limit the rebuttal to one builder speaking for three minutes. Councilmember Plunkett did not support the proposed motion although he supported the concept of residential sprinklers and a reduction in the connection charge for voluntary installation of fire sprinklers. He welcomed additional discussion, noting the proposed motion was a drastic change from the 3,000 or 5,000 square foot threshold. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the Council has had as much education as the Public Safety Committee via receipt of numerous documents. She agreed the Public Safety Committee did not discuss a zero threshold but the Committee also did not discuss a reduction in the connection charge for voluntary Packet Page 13 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 11 installation of fire sprinklers. The Committee agreed to a 3,000 or 5,000 square foot threshold to make it more palatable to the builders. During Committee discussions, she indicated 3,000 square feet was the lowest threshold she would accept. The members of the Public Safety Committee, Councilmember Wilson and she, agreed to allow the Council to discuss it and make a decision. Councilmember Peterson relayed his respect for fire professionals and their support for fire sprinklers to save lives and property. He also respected the reality that builders face. He did not find that the added cost outweighed the benefit. He referred to the seatbelt analogy, noting not long ago there were 2-point seatbelts. Now there are 3-point seatbelts and wearing a seatbelt is required. The technology of seatbelts has improved as has the technology for installing fire sprinklers in new homes. He expressed his support for the motion, preferring to swing the balance toward safety. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUIRE FIRE SPRINKLERS IN 3,000 SQUARE FOOT HOMES. Mayor Cooper asked whether that would include waiver of the connection charge for voluntary installation of fire sprinklers in homes less than 3,000 square feet. Mr. Snyder relayed staff’s indication that it would. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, PETERSON AND PETSO VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT, WILSON, AND FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM VOTING NO. Councilmember Wilson commented throughout the discussion at the Public Safety Committee, it was made clear that sprinklers are primarily about saving property; the vast majority of lives are saved via smoke detectors. The Committee did not discuss retrofitting, assuming it was cost prohibitive. He anticipated the cost of adding a sprinkler system to his existing home would be $20,000. He did not view the $5,000 - $8,000 cost of installing sprinklers in a new home much differently than $20,000 for sprinklers in an existing home. For those interested in affordable housing, requiring fire sprinklers will burden low income, low square footage, low price market houses. He acknowledged an additional $10,000 for fire sprinklers in a 5,000 square foot home would have little noticeable impact. However, the additional cost would significantly impact the purchaser of a 1300 square foot home. Councilmember Plunkett commented a zero threshold raised many additional dynamics. He noted tonight’s presentation was in regard to a 3,000 or 5,000 square foot threshold; there was no presentations or public testimony regarding a zero threshold. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO 3,000 SQUARE FEET. Discussion followed regarding whether such a motion was in order as it had previously been defeated. Mr. Snyder recommended the Council vote on the main motion first. Councilmember Plunkett suggested the Council hold another public hearing because a zero threshold was different than the presentation or testimony provided. MAYOR COOPER RULED THE AMENDMENT OUT OF ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED TO TABLE THIS ITEM, SUBJECT TO COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM SCHEDULING ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO, WILSON AND PLUNKETT VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM AND COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Packet Page 14 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 12 COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO 2,999 SQUARE FEET. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON, PLUNKETT, AND PETSO AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM VOTING NO. Councilmember Petso commented she may have been able to support a zero threshold had the public hearing included that option. She agreed with Councilmember Plunkett that that option was not presented to the public tonight. She supported scheduling another public hearing, finding the safety of fire personnel an important consideration in requiring the installation of fire sprinklers. Mayor Cooper pointed out the agenda title was Public Hearing Regarding Residential Fire Sprinklers; he asked if the notice stated square footage thresholds. Mr. Snyder answered there was no legal problem; the Council could consider an ordinance at a regular meeting and a public hearing was not required unless required by statute which was not applicable in this instance. He summarized there was no legal problem, the issue may be appearance as the zero threshold was not included in the packet as an option. With regard to 3,000 versus 5,000 square feet, Councilmember Wilson commented the Public Safety Committee worked hard to dull the emotion regarding this topic. If a zero threshold had been one of the options, he was certain more members of the building and real estate community would have attended tonight’s meeting. This meeting was advertised in the Master Builder’s newsletter and communicated to the Snohomish County-Camano Realtors Association with information that the Public Safety Committee did not recommend a zero threshold. If the Council was interested in a zero threshold he recommended delaying the decision to gather further public input. If a zero threshold would save firefighters’ and the public’s lives, Student Representative Gibson did not understand why it was such a large issue to require fire sprinklers in new residential homes. VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION: UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON AND FRALEY COUNCIL AND PRESIDENT BERNHEIM VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO, PLUNKETT, BUCKSHNIS AND WILSON VOTING NO. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK FOR ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas questioned the need for another public hearing if the Council had not approved a zero threshold. Councilmember Petso answered that based on tonight’s discussion, a zero threshold is a possibility. Council President Bernheim commented he had expected a motion tonight to adopt a 3,000 or 5,000 square foot threshold. He made the motion for a zero threshold after being persuaded by the fire professionals’ comments versus the builder. He agreed requiring fire sprinklers added costs, but all safety and building regulations add cost. With the failure of the zero threshold, he supported adopting a 3,000 square foot threshold. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW HER SECOND, AND COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT SECONDED THE MOTION. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas encouraged the Council to vote no, finding no reason for a future public hearing if the options were to require fire sprinklers for 3,000 and 5,000 square foot residential structures. MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT AND PETSO VOTING YES. Packet Page 15 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 13 COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3819, REQUIRING AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM BE INSTALLED IN NEW ONE-FAMILY AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS AND TOWNHOUSES EXCEEDING 3,000 SQUARE FEET OF FIRE AREA. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT AND WILSON VOTING NO. Mayor Cooper thanked the Council for their lively and professional debate on this difficult issue. He declared a brief recess. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, requested the Community Services/Economic Development Quarterly Report be placed on the Council Agenda instead of the Consent Agenda and the report placed on the information table in Council Chambers. She requested the following from Mayor Cooper: 1) a list of the minimum build alternatives for Edmonds ferry improvements referred to in the July 29 quarterly report that the ferry system staff continues to explore, 2) options for improving loading and off-loading efficiency that were considered at the meeting regarding the Main Street terminal held with WSF representative David Mosley, two State representatives, and City staff, where would the additional signal be located and how would it improve the existing system, 3) WSF’s new plan for Unocal does not include a Sound Transit station at Unocal, 4) when will the Unocal/Chevron site be cleaned up and will it be clean enough to meet mixed use zoning that applies to the property in the Comprehensive Plan, and 5) the quarterly report refers to a June 27 workshop regarding the Mukilteo multimodal terminal and reference was made to a WSF website for further information. She asked whether that website would have described WSF’s suggestion for a Clinton-Edmonds route to replace the Clinton-Mukilteo route. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, thanked Mayor Cooper and Council President Bernheim for attending the Christmas in July event at Top Foods to collect toys for the Edmonds Food Bank Toy Drive. The Edmonds Food Bank served 500 people today; the most it has served in a long time. Food and toys will be collected again at Top Foods on November 19, 20 and 21. He thanked everyone who donated food and toys. Don Hall, Edmonds, relayed his concern with Council President Bernheim’s removal and defacing of signs on Sunset Avenue. Item 6 on the April 20, 2010 agenda states Public Hearing on Proposed Amendments to the Edmonds City Code, Dogs on Public Grounds, not passage of an ordinance. At that meeting the Council unanimously passed a motion adopting the recommended amendments to the Edmonds City Code 5.05.060 allowing dogs on leashes and on designated paths at Hickman Park, Haines Wharf Park and well as the path and grassy strip along the west side of Sunset Avenue. Mr. Snyder advised an ordinance adopting the amendments would be scheduled on a future Consent Agenda; this did not occur until recently. He referred to Council President Bernheim questioning the truth of the statement that the Council recommended amendments to the City code, finding it legally false. He referred to Council President Bernheim’s assertion that the Council voted on April 20, 2010 to open Sunset Avenue to dogs on leashes, pointing out an ordinance was required to enact that direction. In a February 22, 2009 email regarding Sunset Avenue, Council President Bernheim stated a possible solution would be to ask the Public Works Department to remove the three signs along Sunset Avenue and others at Brackett’s Landing so that people would think it was okay to walk their dogs in the park. Mr. Hall questioned the rush, noting the issue was raised in February 2009, the changes were recommended in April 2010 and Council President Bernheim only needed to wait another 3-4 days before the ordinance was passed on the Consent Agenda. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Item 9 on the agenda, suggesting another public hearing be scheduled as changes had been made to the plans. Acknowledging the job of operating the City and supervising personnel is the Mayor’s responsibility, he offered criticism of Mayor Cooper’s management Packet Page 16 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 14 style in regard to staff behavior that is detrimental to the health of City government. He referred to the behavior of Finance Director Lorenzo Hines two weeks ago during a financial report and discussion regarding the 1% increase in the regular property tax levy in which Mr. Hines turned his back to Councilmember Buckshnis and returned to his seat. He requested Mayor Cooper ask Mr. Hines to publicly apologize to Councilmember Buckshnis for his disrespect and arrogance. 11A. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DEFENSE AND INDEMNITY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2.06. Council President Bernheim explained the proposed resolution would indemnify Councilmembers from incurring fees for the purposes mentioned in the resolution. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1237, AUTHORIZING DEFENSE AND INDEMNITY PURSUANT TO CHATPER 2.06 ECC SUBJECT TO RESERATION OF RIGHTS, OF TWO CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM THE COST OF LEGAL DEFENSE INCURRED IN RESPONSE TO A WORKPLACE INVESTIGATION. Councilmember Wilson requested a copy of the resolution and an opportunity to read it. City Clerk Sandy Chase also requested a copy of the resolution. Councilmember Wilson expressed his support for the intent, noting he had not read Chapter 2.06. His understanding was electeds when acting in an official capacity were indemnified and represented by corporate counsel when appropriate and the costs borne by the City. He asked if the resolution was simply a restatement of that regulation. Council President Bernheim answered in order to provide that benefit it must be authorized by the City Council. Councilmember Wilson asked whether the indemnity always exists and a resolution only required when members need to obtain outside counsel. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained there is a process in Chapter 2.06.040, indemnity from a claim, settlement or payment is covered; the costs of defense are covered to the extent of the City’s contract with Ogden Murphy Wallace. The City will pay up to $215/hour to supplement any costs incurred by the Councilmember. As an example, he referred to several employees who made a similar request to the Council several months ago when they were the subject of a claim at the State Licensing Agency. The conflict for him arises because he represents the City in its corporate capacity and cannot advise Councilmembers in this process. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if she needed to recuse herself from the vote. Mr. Snyder answered the conflict of interest statute does not apply; this is a benefit provided by ordinance and she need not recuse herself. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY BY INCREASING THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY THE CURRENT 101% LEVY LIMIT, THEREBY LEVYING AN ESTIMATED REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY OF $9,535,938, EMS LEVY OF $3,533,529 AND LEVYING $877,984 FOR VOTED INDEBTEDNESS FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3820, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY BY INCREASING THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY THE CURRENT 101% LEVY LIMIT, THEREBY LEVYING AN ESTIMATED REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY OF $9,535,938, EMS LEVY OF $3,533,529 AND LEVYING $877,984 FOR VOTED INDEBTEDNESS FOR THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. 2010 THIRD QUARTER BUDGET UPDATE Finance Director Lorenzo Hines reported the 2010 Third Quarter Budget Update was discussed at the November 9 Finance Committee meeting and a number of questions were asked. Responses to questions will be provided by the end of the week. He invited additional questions. Packet Page 17 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 15 Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the June Quarterly Budget was updated based on the proposed budget amendments which resulted in a misstatement of the June Quarterly Budget; the amendments approved in October were not included in the Third Quarter Budget. The Third Quarter Budget shows an interfund transfer of $1.3 million from Fund 511 to the General Fund. Mr. Hines offered to research, noting it may be due to Fire District 1 transactions. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned the logic of including the unapproved budget amendments in the Second Quarter Budget Update (June) and not including the amendments in the Third Quarter Budget (September) that were approved on October 5. Mr. Hines answered the amendment was approved in the October accounting period and will be reflected in Period 10. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to RCW 35A.33.140 regarding quarterly statements and statutory requirements. She asked if there was a legal risk in misstating the City’s financial statements and having inaccurate financial statements that had been intentionally created. She noted in the corporate sector, misstatements in financial statements requiring notification of the SEC, restatement of the financial statements, etc. Mr. Snyder answered SEC rules do not apply to the City. He offered to research and provide a written response to the Council. For the purposes of his memo, he would assume the information was inaccurate. Councilmember Petso commented the EMS transport fees seem to be trickling in at a slow rate, the revenue from that source is only at 45% of budget. She asked whether staff had been able to determine why receipt of those funds was so slow and whether receipt would improve during the remainder of the year to reach the budgeted amount. Mr. Hines responded staff is still researching that issue; an answer will be included in his responses by the end of the week. Councilmember Petso expressed her appreciation for staff adding funds to the Budget Summary by Fund and requested all funds be included such as the $1.3 million Public Safety Reserve Fund. Councilmember Wilson asked if Fire District 1 was less motivated to collect the funds than the Edmonds Fire Department had been. Mayor Cooper responded the Fire District 1 Chief indicated to him that they are transporting more people inside Edmonds than the Edmonds Fire Department had. Some of the delay is due to insurance and Medicaid reimbursements. He noted it was possible the City would receive a windfall of collections in 2011 when all reimbursements are made. Councilmember Wilson observed that same windfall may have occurred in early 2010. 8. AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE INTERURBAN TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS City Engineer Rob English explained if approved by the Council, staff would advertise for construction bids in early 2011. He provided a map of trails in Snohomish and King Counties including the Burke- Gilman, Centennial and Interurban trails, explaining the Interurban Trail is part of a trail system from Seattle to Everett. He provided a brief history of the trail, explaining the Ballinger Trolley Car operated on the alignment through Edmonds, serving Edmonds to Seattle. He provided a photograph of the old Lake Ballinger Station used by the trolley system. Today, portions of the trail alignment are overgrown, unimproved right-of-way. He reviewed project goals that include providing a continuous trail, safe recreation and commuter opportunities, meeting local and regional needs and creating and preserving access to a linear park and open spaces. Mr. English described the trail:  Beginning at Ballinger Park on the south, a 12-foot wide trail will be constructed to 76th Avenue  Crossing 76th Avenue, the trail will continue to 74th Avenue, a paved residential street  From 74th to 75th will be improved for trail and vehicle users Packet Page 18 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 16  North from that location, a 12-foot wide trail will be constructed to 228th where it connects with the Mountlake Terrace trail that was constructed last year  76th Avenue will be restriped to provide bike lanes from SR104 north to 228th and on 228th from 76th to the Mountlake Terrace trail. Bike lanes will require removal of some parking spaces on 76th Avenue. Bike lanes will shift from side to side to provide parking along 76th Avenue.  Shelter on the trail on the east side of 76th. Public Works Director Phil Williams explained in recent months, pervious asphalt has been added to several key sections of the trail. The project was originally designed with all impervious asphalt and a detention vault was included to offset 1:1 the additional square footage added to the sensitive Lake Ballinger drainage area. The change to pervious asphalt for a total length of 2,100 feet of the 4,400 feet of trail creates a net environmental positive. Councilmember Peterson asked about the cost difference for pervious asphalt. Mr. Williams answered although it was originally anticipated the cost would be substantial, recent discussions with paving vendors suggests the total cost to add pervious asphalt would be at or below $50,000 for the additional aggregate placed below the asphalt to create a reservoir for storage of water. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE INTERURBAN TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS. Councilmember Peterson commented the members of Community Services/Development Services Committee (Councilmember Petso and he) originally intended to place this item on the Consent Agenda but felt such a positive project should be highlighted. Councilmember Buckshnis commented at the presentation Mr. Williams, Mr. English and Mr. Hauss made at the SeaShore Transportation Forum, everyone was excited about the Interurban Trail project because Edmonds has been the missing link. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2011-2016). City Engineer Rob English explained the draft Capital Facilities Plan (2011-2016) and Capital Improvement Program (2011-2016) were presented to the CS/DS Committee on September 14, 2010, a presentation was made to the City Council on September 28, 2010, and a public hearing was held on October 5, 2010. At the October 5 public hearing, 3 issues were raised: 1. The $50,000 for traffic calming added to the Transportation Plan was not included in the CFP. Staff has added that amount to the CFP. 2. TBD revenue and projects shown in the CFP did not match the TBD list approved by the TBD Board. With the failure of the TBD ballot measure, reference to TBD revenue has been changed to unsecured revenue. It is important to retain the projects in the CFP and to match the TIP because projects eligible for grant funding must be in the 6-year TIP. 3. Prioritization of the CFP General Project List. As a result of a meeting Councilmember Wilson held with staff, then-Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh prepared a memo with additional explanation regarding the status of projects. He noted the Council approved the Surface Water portion of the plan at the October 5, 2010 Council meeting. Packet Page 19 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 17 COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM, TO APPROVE THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2011-2016). COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD TO THE 2011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A PUBLIC MARKET FACILITY IN THE DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT AREA WITH NO DATA OR COSTS SPECIFIED AND TO ADD IT TO THE 2011 DOCKET. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT AND WILSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Wilson thanked staff, particularly Mr. McIntosh for describing the rationale for several projects in the CIP. He noted some of items on the CIP General list were included because someone suggested it at a public meeting and there has been no feasibility work or significant staff support for many of those projects such as the Edmonds Sno-Isle Library changes. He suggested when the CFP/CIP is adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendments at the end of the year, consideration be given to removing some of those projects. 10. ANNUAL NON-REPRESENTED COMPENSATION UPDATE. Human Resources Director Debi Humann explained as required by the City’s Non-Represented Compensation (NRC) policy, she is presenting the results of the annual compensation survey, the updated NRC policy and the draft Salary Ordinance. Non-represented employees’ salaries are impacted by three actions, 1) the annual salary survey required by the NRC policy, 2) annual merit increases that are tied to employee performance, and 3) when warranted, a cost of living adjustment (COLA) approved by Council. The annual salary survey was performed per the NRC policy and the results of both surveyed positions were included in the Council packet. The position of Police Chief and Human Resources Assistant were compared against like positions in comparable cities. This year’s survey found the position of Police Chief was below the median position and as a result of the survey and per City policy, Band A requires a slight adjustment upward to maintain the L-5 position to the marketplace which also results in a slight upward movement to Bands B-G. No movement was warranted for the Band H as the survey shows the HR Assistant position was at the L5 or median of the marketplace. Ms. Humann noted this slight movement of the bands does not mean that the non-represented employees receive a wage increase. Per the NRC policy, merit increases are awarded on the employee's anniversary date and are based on job performance. Due to the difficult economy, non-represented employees, comprised of management, professional and technical teams, have over the past few years had their wages frozen, given back salary savings via furloughs and have voluntarily accepted smaller annual merit increases than allowed for under the policy. Unlike union employees, none of the non-represented employees are paid at the maximum of their band. With the negative June-June CPI, no COLA is recommended or requested for 2011 for non-represented employees. The Council packet includes an updated version of the NRC policy. The updated policy and wage information were presented at the October Finance Committee where it was agreed the materials should move forward to full Council without recommendation. The Finance Committee requested the changes to Article 1.3 of the draft ordinance, clarifying that this section was to be used on a temporary basis only. A Councilmember also requested both the current non-represented band amounts as well as the proposed band amounts be provided for comparison purposes. This information is contained in the draft ordinance as well as in Exhibit A, titled "2011 Non-Represented Employee Pay Schedule." Packet Page 20 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 18 Staff requests Council approval of the 2011 Wage Bands reflecting the results of the salary survey per City policy, approval of the updated NRC policy and approval of the draft salary ordinance. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR ONE HOUR. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Bernheim asked whether the material presented applied to the hourly adjustments discussed at the Finance Committee meeting last week with regard to the change in minimum wage. Ms. Humann answered it did not. Her understanding was the Finance Committee reviewed the minimum wage table and approval would be scheduled on a future Consent Agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE NON-REPRESENTED COMPENSATION POLICY. Councilmember Petso did not support the motion. She appreciated the changes made in paragraph 1.3 and thanked Ms. Humann and Police Chief Compaan for meeting with her to explain the policy. She was not convinced there was anything coherent about the policy and offered to make a budget amendment to have a proper salary survey conducted and different policy established. She did not support the NRC policy for the following reasons: 1. Comparable cities are limited to King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties which excludes cities that may have positions that are comparable to the work Edmonds employees perform such as Bremerton, Olympia or Lacey. 2. Only two positions out of approximately 24 positions are surveyed for comparables. At that rate, those positions would not be surveyed again for 12 years or if those same two positions are surveyed each year, the salaries of the other 22 employees are not surveyed. 3. The ordinance identifies a series of bands and employees are paid within the bands. She was not satisfied with that approach. For example Band A includes the Police Chief who supervises 50-60 employees, the Human Resources Director who supervises two employees and the Parks & Recreation Director who supervises numerous employees. She summarized the positions in Band A perform very different functions and she was uncertain why they would be in the same band. 4. There are no actual numbers in any of the documents; therefore, she was unaware how much each position in Band A is paid. The ordinance specifies a range of between $100,000 and $155,000. The budget does not specify the amount. Councilmembers are not permitted to review actual payroll; she can only see the total amount of payroll when it is approved. Councilmember Plunkett observed review of the NRC policy is scheduled on an upcoming agenda. City Clerk Sandy Chase advised it was scheduled on the December 21 meeting agenda. If the Council planned to review the NRC policy in December, he asked why the Council needed to adopt an updated policy tonight. Ms. Humann answered the only change made to the policy was to update titles to reflect current staff. The actual process and policy was not changed. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained in order to implement the ordinance, the Council needed banding to describe who was in each band, page 3 describes the annual merit increase that the Mayor provides pursuant to paragraph 1.2 of the ordinance, and recruitment which places employees within a band. He suggested those portions were necessary to allow staff to administer the ordinance. Councilmember Plunkett summarized approving the policy implements the ordinance. Although he was not satisfied with the policy, the actions requested by Ms. Humann were in accordance with the policy. Because the Council planned to begin reviewing the policy next, he was willing to adopt the update to the existing policy. Packet Page 21 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 19 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the current bands and proposed bands, noting the amount within the proposed bands is higher for Bands A-G. She asked if it was within the Mayor’s prerogative to determine whether an employee merits a raise within the new, higher band. Ms. Humann explained according to the NRC policy, the band minimums and maximums are established annually by the Council. Merit increases between 0 and 3% are based on performance as determined by an employee’s annual performance review. None of the non-represented employees are at the top of their band. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas summarized an employee with good performance could receive a 3-5% increase in 2011. Ms. Humann answered the merit increases are 0-3%. There is language in the NRC policy that allows for a 5% increase for meritorious service. In the history of the policy, only one employee has received 5%. During the last two years, non-represented employees at the director and division manager level have received half merit increases. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how represented employees’ increases were calculated. Ms. Humann answered collective bargaining agreements establish wages; their steps are 5% until they reach the maximum of their pay grade. Represented employees receive a 5% annual increase based on longevity, not performance. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the section regarding additional compensation for an employee doing the duties of another position. Ms. Humann answered City policies address working out of class, doing the work of a position of a higher level such as filling in during vacation for the supervisor. There was no policy for an employee doing the job of a lower level employee. The NRC policy gave the Mayor the opportunity to award someone doing additional work at a lower level. That has never been used; non-represented employees have simply absorbed additional workloads. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the policy could change in five weeks. Ms. Humann answered the Council would begin reviewing the NRC policy in five weeks. Mr. Snyder advised approval of the annual salary ordinance is required to supplement approval of the budget. Councilmember Wilson observed the City’s policy is L-5 or the median of comparable cities. In implementation for bargaining units, the L-5 level is actually the top of the band. Ms. Humann agreed, explaining an employee paid to the maximum of their wage band, they are paid to the median of the benchmarked cities. He observed the top of the band for the Police Chief was $155,000 which is the L-5 level. He anticipated the City did not have the staff to compare job descriptions or workloads. Ms. Humann agreed, noting there was more to the directors’ functions than the number of employees they supervise. Councilmember Wilson agreed, noting basing L5 on title was not an accurate representation to set policy. Ms. Humann explained there are many different compensation policies in other cities; there was no one correct way. Councilmember Wilson recalled former Councilmember Wambolt’s support for a market survey. Mr. Snyder commented one of the reasons the Council adopted the NRC policy was to avoid paying a consultant biannually to conduct a survey. Ms. Humann pointed out the last time the City hired a consultant was in 1997. One of the reasons the current policy only surveys two positions is the limited staffing levels in Human Resources. Councilmember Wilson commented the median compensation level for the Police Chief with a department of 55 uniformed officers is $155,000 and the Human Resources Director with a department of 2 is also at $155,000 and there are differences in their job responsibilities. He recalled Ms. Humann’s previous title was Human Resources Manager, noting whether an employee was a director or manager was based on his/her job description. Ms. Humann explained prior to the NRC policy, every non- represented position was benchmarked to other cities. She assured the Human Resources Director does not earn what the Police Chief does; her salary is the lowest of all director positions. When all the Packet Page 22 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 20 positions were originally benchmarked, they were transferred into a band. Although each employee has received merit increases over the years, their salaries have not increased much beyond the original bands. There is a 50% band width in each band. The majority of positions are between the minimum and median of each band; few positions are above the median with the exception of the Police Chief which is benchmarked to the outside. Councilmember Wilson commented if the Human Resources Director was moved to Band C, it would have no practical impact. Ms. Humann acknowledged it was very difficult to compare jobs. Former Mayor Haakenson and she discussed essential functions, degree of responsibility, degree of liability to the City, etc. when placing positions in the bands. She acknowledged placing job titles into bands was a subjective decision. Councilmember Wilson recognized the NRC policy had been in place for a while. He was concerned the current policy stated a 5% merit increase could be awarded for meritorious service, that another 5% could be provided for an employee doing additional job duties, and that an additional week’s compensation was provided for employees doing training. Mayor Cooper clarified employees can receive up to a 3% merit increase; under special circumstances for meritorious service, an employee can received 5%. Since this policy was adopted, only one non- represented employee has received a 5% increase. For an employee to receive a 5% increase, his/her boss must convince the Mayor that his/her performance warrants a 5% increase. The 5% acting pay only applied during the period of time an employee was doing someone else’s job up to a maximum of 6 months or until the position is filled. For example there is currently no Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Director; he did not appoint an acting director and none of the three managers are receiving additional compensation. During the period of time the Development Services Director position was vacant, neither the Building Official nor the Planning Manager received additional compensation to perform those duties. Although Mr. Clifton assumed many of the Development Services Director’s responsibilities, neither former Mayor Haakenson nor he authorized additional compensation. Not because they did not deserve it but due to concern with the City’s budget. Councilmember Wilson suggested revising the policy to reflect current practice. Councilmember Plunkett suggested it would not be effective to tweak the existing policy when the Council would be reviewing the policy soon. The proposed policy implements the ordinance and keeps it in place until the Council completes its review of the policy. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked why the policy was being updated and whether the old policy would remain in place if the Council did not adopt the updated policy. Ms. Humann answered the only change to the NRC policy was new non-represented employee titles. For example the previous Finance Director’s title was Administrative Services Director and some titles for employees on the 2nd floor were added. The process in the policy was not altered. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the Council not adopting the NRC policy update affected any non-represented employees’ salaries, benefits, etc. Mr. Snyder commented the policy authorizes how any new position was placed in the band. Unless the NRC policy is approved, the salaries for those new positions would not be authorized. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas summarized it would harm non-represented employees by their not receiving the banded salary. Mr. Snyder clarified the City would receive an audit note that an employee was being paid without their being included in the salary ordinance. Ms. Humann answered unless the updated NRC policy were adopted, the City would not be in compliance with the policy. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO AND WILSON VOTING NO. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3821, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY RANGES FOR NON-REPRESENTED EXEMPT PERSONNEL FOR THE BUDGET YEAR 2011. Packet Page 23 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 21 Councilmember Buckshnis commented when Band A increases, the other bands also receive an increase. She commented it would have been beneficial to survey both Bands A and B. Ms. Humann clarified none of the employees receive an automatic increase due to the band adjustments, the bands are simply adjusted. Councilmember Buckshnis assumed if Band A and B had been surveyed and Band A increased and Band B did not, it may not have been appropriate to increase Bands B-G. Council President Bernheim did not like the system and did not completely understand it. However, at this point in the year, as a practical matter, the Council needs to approve the policy in place. Changes to the policy could be considered next year. Councilmember Plunkett observed the ranges were within the Mayor’s preliminary budget. Mayor Cooper agreed, noting although the bands changed, none of the employees were guaranteed an increase and under the policy none of the employees were eligible for a raise larger than a 3% merit increase based on their evaluation. He has informed the directors to expect a maximum 1.5% merit increase. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed concern with increasing the bands now and potentially reversing that decision and lowering the bands next year. Mr. Snyder responded all the non-represented employees were at-will employees and their salaries could be reduced or their jobs eliminated at any time for any reason. Mayor Cooper clarified the Council could pass a new salary ordinance at any time and change the band. Mr. Snyder agreed. Mayor Cooper pointed out prior to appointing the new Mayor, the Council passed a new salary ordinance setting the Mayor’s salary for the remainder of the term. He anticipated drastic changes would need to be made to result in a cut to an employee’s salary because none of them are at the top of the band. Mr. Snyder commented another tool is red-lining/maintaining a salary at a level until the band catches up. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas acknowledged the Mayor’s salary was revised but the position was vacant at the time. She expressed concern with potentially reducing an employee’s salary. Mayor Cooper clarified his point was the Council had the ability to approve a salary ordinance at any time that reduced or increased the bands. The salary ordinance needs to be passed to enact the budget. Councilmember Wilson clarified his intent was not to reduce salaries; he was interested in eliminating the language in the ordinance that provides an additional week of compensation for an employee participating in training another employee. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO AND WILSON VOTING NO. (Councilmember Fraley-Monillas left the meeting at 10:40 p.m.) 11. OPEN DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE BUDGET AMENDMENTS Council President Bernheim reviewed the budget process  October 19 – public hearing on the budget  October 26 – Councilmembers asked questions of staff  November 9 Finance Committee – Councilmember had the opportunity to submit questions  November 16 – Councilmembers state possible amendments to the budget  November 23 – deadline for Councilmember to submit written budget amendments  December 7 – vote on amendments and the 2011 budget Council President Bernheim reviewed budget amendments that have been suggested:  Funding stormwater staff from the Utility Funds  Restoring funds to the Parks Trust Fund Packet Page 24 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 22  Funding a Strategic Plan  Funding Edmonds Center for the Arts  Establish a Reserve amount  Reinstating the Police Department Crime Prevention Division  Spend less for the City Attorney  Funds for the Old Mill Town park  Reduce obligations to the Woodway police contract  Reduce incarceration costs  Reduce the budget for leaf blowers Councilmember Buckshnis asked when the Council would receive actual numbers, exhibits and summations of departments that have been requested. Mayor Cooper responded staff is continuing to answer questions the Council and citizens raised. His understanding was the attachments contained the requested information and he asked what additional information she needed. Councilmember Buckshnis advised Exhibit 4 was the only chart the Council has received. Councilmember Petso planned to propose the following amendment:  Not use one-time money from the Public Safety Reserve for fire hydrant maintenance. The Council adopted a particularly high water utility tax for the purpose of fire hydrant maintenance. She planned to allocate funds from the water utility tax for fire hydrant maintenance. Councilmember Peterson planned to propose the following amendments:  Fund the $100,000 Strategic Plan proposed by the Economic Development Commission. He was considering funding it with cuts from other areas of the budget.  Fund in some small way the Edmonds Center for the Arts/Public Facilities District via reallocating funds in the budget Councilmember Buckshnis advised she has prepared the following amendments:  Establishing a reserve of one month’s expenditures  Funding the Strategic Plan  Restoring funds to the Parks Trust Fund  Authorize Stormwater and GIS positions  Transfer $280,000 - $300,000 from the General Fund to the Street Fund 111 Council President Bernheim listed the amendments he planned to propose:  Budget less for the City Attorney, acknowledging budgeting less did not necessarily result in spending less  Include $40,000 to remodel the Old Mill Town Park  Charge Woodway more for police services  Explore with the Police Department ways to reduce the $50,000/month jail care budget  Explore alternatives to park maintenance that do not require purchasing new leaf blowers Councilmember Wilson asked for a more detailed breakdown of the revenue forecast. Further detail would allow him to determine the amount budgeted for EMS transport fees in 2011. He asked whether the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) had provided a formal recommendation. He noted the ordinance requires the LTAC to provide a formal recommendation to the Council for its budgeted expenditures. Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton answered as part of the budget process, the Council reviews the LTAC budget. He relayed Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin’s indication that that process had been followed in the past. Councilmember Wilson responded the process he described was contained in the ordinance. Packet Page 25 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 23 Council President Bernheim clarified the intent of this agenda item was for Councilmembers to identify the amendments they planned to propose. Councilmember Wilson clarified he planned to propose an amendment regarding funding the ECA using LTAC funds but was uncertain whether the LTAC had met and made a recommendation. Next, he requested the questions he submitted in response to Question 1 in Week October 11 be provided. Councilmember Wilson planned to propose the following amendments:  Reinstate the Crime Prevention Unit  Reinstate the School Resource Officer  Implement the $50,000 for traffic calming in the CIP – Public Works Director Phil Williams offered to prepare a budget amendment  Review the advertising plan for economic development to ensure it is as robust as possible  Hire police officers to bring the level to the average Councilmember Wilson recognized a significant number of additional expenditures would be proposed but few cuts. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVE TO HAVE EVERY BUDGET AMENDMENT REGARDING AN EXPENDITURE BE OFFSET BY A CUT/REALLOCATION SO THAT ALL AMENDMENTS ARE BUDGET NEUTRAL. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Plunkett commented he supported Councilmember Wilson’s motion in concept but was not willing to be restricted at this time. Councilmember Plunkett distributed three amendments:  Restore $36,500 to the Park Trust Fund  The Historic Preservation Commission has requested $7,500 to reprint the historic brochure and walking tour  Chamber of Commerce has requested $5,000 for the parade Councilmember Buckshnis indicated she planned to submit a $5,000 request for the Chamber from the Council Contingency Fund. She asked whether Councilmember Plunkett was suggesting $5,000 to fund next year’s parade. Councilmember Plunkett advised he was willing to consider options. The Council accepted Mayor Cooper’s offer to have staff prepare amendments regarding the other decision packages proposed by staff such as additional portable toilets ($5,000), lawnmower and leaf blower, and Police body armor. He advised the $42,000 request for a consultant for the healthcare plan broker was not needed. Mr. Hines advised the supplemental information distributed on October 22 included the revised decision package document that identifies the fund. He offered to resend the list tomorrow. Mayor Cooper advised staff was preparing an interactive spreadsheet that will be displayed as Councilmembers introduce amendments to illustrate how the amendment will change expenditures and revenues on Exhibit 4 as well as the future year’s projections. 12. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 9, 2010 Community Services/Development Services Committee Councilmember Peterson reported most of the items the Committee considered were on the Consent Agenda or Council agenda. The Committee reviewed the legislative agenda and expressed support for extending the PFD sales and use tax credit from 2027 to 2037. The Committee continued its review of the Packet Page 26 of 145 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 16, 2010 Page 24 compostable food packaging ordinance; further update/discussion will be scheduled next year. Staff also provided the Committee a Quarterly Public Works Project Report. Finance Committee Councilmember Buckshnis reported most of the items were approved on the Consent Agenda. The Committee spent a considerable amount of time discussing the Monthly General Fund Update and the Third Quarter Budget Update. A reformat of the finance reports showing actual to budget is still being requested. A number of questions were asked with regard to the Third Quarter Budget. The Committee discussed the Hourly Employee Wage Schedule and the fact that increasing the minimum wage results in all wages increasing. Next, the Committee discussed the General Fund Reserve Policy; she prepared a resolution to establish a one-month policy which has been the City’s norm for the past ten years. The Committee also recommended approval of the Senior Executive Council Assistant’s contract. Mr. Hertrich and Mr. Wambolt provided public comment. Public Safety Committee Councilmember Wilson reported the Committee reviewed the legislative agenda as it related to public safety. In its discussion regarding regionalization of fire services, the Committee expressed interest in more information regarding what is more appropriate for Edmonds citizens – staying with Fire District 1, moving to a regional fire authority, reverse annexation or something else. A special Public Safety Committee meeting will be held next week and the Committee will hold its regular meeting December 14. 13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Cooper reported over the last few weeks, the City has received over $2.1 million in grants from Puget Sound Regional Council and other entities for projects such as:  Design and engineering work at Five Corners  Additional grant for planned work on Main Street between 5th & 6th Avenue  Intersection improvements at 228th & Highway 99  Enhancements, illumination and expansion of the project in the International District on Hwy 99  Improvements and interpretive signs downtown via a Preserve America Grant for Mayor Cooper emphasized these grants were a direct result of staff’s efforts to seek out grants. The grants provide seed money to get some important projects underway. He expressed his thanks to staff for securing the grants. 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Bernheim encouraged the public to volunteer or donate money or food to a food bank during the holiday season. 15. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. Packet Page 27 of 145 AM-3549   Item #: 2. C. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Lorenzo Hines Submitted By:Nori Jacobson Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Approve for Consent Agenda Type:Action  Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #122358 through #122513 dated November 18, 2010 for $415,757.40.  Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #49951 through #49980 for the period November 1, 2010 through November 15, 2010 for $635,158.60. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposit and checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2010 Revenue: Expenditure:1,050,916.00 Fiscal Impact: Claims $415,757.40 Payroll $635,158.60 Attachments Claim Checks 11-18-10 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Lorenzo Hines 11/19/2010 09:40 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 09:45 AM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/19/2010 09:52 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 09:57 AM Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 11/18/2010 09:05 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 28 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122358 11/18/2010 064622 A.I.R. EMISSIONS 101110 Vehicle Emission Testings and Emission Vehicle Emission Testings and Emission 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 321.00 Total :321.00 122359 11/18/2010 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 288537 1-13992 PEST CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 69.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 6.56 Total :75.56 122360 11/18/2010 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 1110107 LEAGUE SHIRTS SHIRTS FOR PICKLEBALL, 3 ON 3 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 209.22 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 19.88 Total :229.10 122361 11/18/2010 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101834104 CYLINDER RENTAL CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 60.25 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.72 Total :65.97 122362 11/18/2010 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8920 Monthly Wholesale Charges fo~ Monthly Wholesale Charges fo~ 411.000.654.534.800.330.00 84,956.19 Total :84,956.19 122363 11/18/2010 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001276852 3-0197-0807770 ASH DISPOSAL 411.000.656.538.800.474.65 1,559.59 Total :1,559.59 1Page: Packet Page 29 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122364 11/18/2010 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001276057 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 125.12 FIRE ST 160197-001276203 garbage for F/S #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 131.37 MCH0197-001276911 garbage for MCC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 61.02 Public Works Facility0197-01276137 Public Works Facility 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 25.69 Public Works Facility 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 97.63 Public Works Facility 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 97.63 Public Works Facility 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 97.63 Public Works Facility 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 97.63 Public Works Facility 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 97.63 Total :831.35 122365 11/18/2010 073495 AMBS, SUE AMBS1115 REFUND REFUND - CUSTOMER REQUEST 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 44.00 Total :44.00 122366 11/18/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-5224303 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 31.14 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.96 Total :34.10 2Page: Packet Page 30 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122367 11/18/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-5212553 21580001 UNIFORM 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 67.38 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.40 21580001655-5224308 UNIFORM SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 67.38 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.40 Total :147.56 122368 11/18/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-5176018 PW MATS PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.55 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.15 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 3Page: Packet Page 31 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122368 11/18/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.55 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC655-5176019 Street Storm Uniform Svc 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.37 Street Storm Uniform Svc 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.36 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.23 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.22 FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-5176021 Fleet Uniform Svc 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 5.85 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.56 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-5184011 Fac Maint Uniform Svc 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06 PW MATS655-5188699 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.55 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.15 4Page: Packet Page 32 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122368 11/18/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.55 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC655-5188700 Street Storm Uniform Svc 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.37 Street Storm Uniform Svc 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.36 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.23 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.22 FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-5188702 Fleet Uniform Svc 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 5.85 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.56 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-5196417 Fac Maint Uniform Svc 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06 PW MATS655-5201012 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.55 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.87 5Page: Packet Page 33 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122368 11/18/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.15 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.55 FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-5201015 Fleet Uniform Svc 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 16.55 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.57 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-5212549 Fac Maint Uniform Svc 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06 PW MATS655-5216678 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.55 PW MATS 6Page: Packet Page 34 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122368 11/18/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.87 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.15 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.56 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.55 Total :282.35 122369 11/18/2010 073394 ARONSON SECURITY GROUP INC WO-SEA-3568 Courts - Video Camera and DVR Courts - Video Camera and DVR 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 806.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 76.57 Total :882.57 122370 11/18/2010 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0124916-IN 01-7500014 DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 3,177.08 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 301.82 7Page: Packet Page 35 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :3,478.9012237011/18/2010 071124 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 122371 11/18/2010 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 77333 INV#77333 - EDMONDS PD LOCATION WALL PLAQUES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 301.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.60 Total :329.60 122372 11/18/2010 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 57845 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 36.97 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 36.97 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 38.08 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 120.12 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 120.11 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.51 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.51 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.62 Total :362.89 122373 11/18/2010 073035 AVAGIMOVA, KARINE 1178 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 100.00 INTERPRETER FEE1179 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 100.00 Total :200.00 8Page: Packet Page 36 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122374 11/18/2010 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE1010 Background check services Background check services 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 30.00 Total :30.00 122375 11/18/2010 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 445666 Fleet Shop Brake Parts Inventory Fleet Shop Brake Parts Inventory 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 394.88 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 37.51 Fleet Shop Brake Parts Inventory445669 Fleet Shop Brake Parts Inventory 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 134.96 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 12.82 Total :580.17 122376 11/18/2010 069218 BISHOP, PAUL 350 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE Web Site Maintenance 001.000.310.518.880.410.00 390.00 Total :390.00 122377 11/18/2010 061966 CAMP FIRE BOYS & GIRLS CAMPFIRE12892 BABYSITTING BASICS BABYSITTING BASICS #12892 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 210.00 Total :210.00 122378 11/18/2010 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 10523558 INV#10523558 CUST#572105 - EDMONDS PD COPIER RENTAL (4) 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 581.60 COPY CHARGES FOR 09/30-10/31/10 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 172.53 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 71.66 Total :825.79 122379 11/18/2010 065171 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC 33464 FLEXLICENSE 9Page: Packet Page 37 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122379 11/18/2010 (Continued)065171 CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC Flexlicense - 6 each 1 yr subscriptions 411.000.652.542.900.310.00 1,181.25 Flexlicense - 6 each 1 yr subscriptions 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1,181.25 Flexlicense - 6 each 1 yr subscriptions 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1,181.25 Flexlicense - 6 each 1 yr subscriptions 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 1,181.25 Total :4,725.00 122380 11/18/2010 071360 CASCADE INDUSTRIES NW INC 2668 10-132 PRIMARY CLARIFIER #1 PAINTING 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 4,741.32 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 450.43 Total :5,191.75 122381 11/18/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN10101034 2954000 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 33.20 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.15 Total :36.35 122382 11/18/2010 063615 CH MURPHY | CLARK-ULLMAN INC 1011007C 7268-B REPAIR HEAT EXCHANGER 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 9,984.96 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 726.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 1,017.54 Total :11,728.50 122383 11/18/2010 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 18062988 COPIER LEASE PW copier lease for PW 10Page: Packet Page 38 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122383 11/18/2010 (Continued)066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 001.000.650.519.910.450.00 643.07 Total :643.07 122384 11/18/2010 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS Frontier ROW Permits Corr recptng of ck s/b credited towards Corr recptng of ck s/b credited towards 001.000.000.316.470.000.00 11,500.00 Total :11,500.00 122385 11/18/2010 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS BLD20090447 BLDG PERMIT/ODOR CONTROL BLDG PERMIT/ODOR CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.510.00 16,041.50 Total :16,041.50 122386 11/18/2010 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I10003192 Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 1,053.00 Total :1,053.00 122387 11/18/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 8220 INV#8220 CUST#47 - EDMONDS PD PRISONER R&B AUGUST 2010 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 1,142.50 INV#8224 CUST#1430 - EDMONDS PD8224 VERIZON PHONES FOR NARCS 10/10 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 54.06 INV#8256 CUST #47 - EDMONDS PD8256 PRISONER R&B SEPT 2010 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 1,587.50 Total :2,784.06 122388 11/18/2010 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC NOV10 C/A CITYOFED00001 Nov-10 Fiber Optics Internet Connection 001.000.310.518.870.420.00 916.20 Total :916.20 122389 11/18/2010 069482 COMPRESSORS NORTHWEST 69001 Unit 31 - Muffler/Exhaust 1/4 Unit 31 - Muffler/Exhaust 1/4 11Page: Packet Page 39 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122389 11/18/2010 (Continued)069482 COMPRESSORS NORTHWEST 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.35 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.60 Total :6.95 122390 11/18/2010 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING OCT 2010 DRY CLEANING/LAUNDRY - OCT- EDMONDS PD LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING 10/2010 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 777.84 Total :777.84 122391 11/18/2010 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 149433 INV#149433 - EDMONDS PD CALIBRATION GVPD 05653 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149434 - EDMONDS PD149434 CALIBRATION GVPD 05654 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149435 - EDMONDS PD149435 CALIBRATION GVPD 08496 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149436 - EDMONDS PD149436 CALIBRATION GHD-02443 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149437 - EDMONDS PD149437 CALIBRATION PL22583 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 12Page: Packet Page 40 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122391 11/18/2010 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 INV#149438 - EDMONDS PD149438 CALIBRATION LP03241 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149439 - EDMONDS PD149439 CALIBRATION LP03242 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149440 - EDMONDS PD149440 CALIBRATION LP03397 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149441 - EDMONDS PD149441 CALIBRATION E14920 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 INV#149442 - EDMONDS PD149442 CALIBRATION E14921 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 7.60 Total :876.00 122392 11/18/2010 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 10/21/10-11/16/10 STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOL State Share of Concealed Pistol 001.000.000.237.190.000.00 294.00 Total :294.00 122393 11/18/2010 007253 DUNN LUMBER 360699 LUMBER POSTS FOR HAINES WHARF PARK SIGN 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 68.00 13Page: Packet Page 41 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122393 11/18/2010 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.46 Total :74.46 122394 11/18/2010 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2010013 BLD2009-0530/Harbor Square field change BLD2009-0530/Harbor Square field change 001.000.620.524.100.410.00 637.50 Total :637.50 122395 11/18/2010 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 10-15593 Water Quality - Lab Samples Water Quality - Lab Samples 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 972.00 Total :972.00 122396 11/18/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001324/1 VISE GRIP & PLIERS VICE GRIPS, PLIERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 34.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.28 SUPPLIES001327/1 STRAP 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.72 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.45 UTILITY LIGHTER1254/1 UTILITY LIGHTER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.47 MISC. FASTENERS1264/1 MISC. FASTENERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.40 MISC. FASTENERS1267/1 14Page: Packet Page 42 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122396 11/18/2010 (Continued)073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE FASTENERS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.68 UTILITY KNIFE1269/1 UTILITY KNIFE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.76 TRASH CANS, SIGNS, ETC.1271/1 CANS, SIGNS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 90.73 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.62 DRILL BIT1282/1 DRILL BIT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.47 Total :185.91 122397 11/18/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 28966 BATTERY BATTERY 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 42.99 9.5% Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 4.08 Total :47.07 122398 11/18/2010 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO R22883 Recycle - Christmas Tree Door Hangers Recycle - Christmas Tree Door Hangers 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 794.33 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 75.46 Total :869.79 15Page: Packet Page 43 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122399 11/18/2010 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 059815 COPIER MAINT COPIER MAINT 001.000.230.512.501.480.00 81.80 Total :81.80 122400 11/18/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU21562 SUPPLIES GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 309.30 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.08 SUPPLIESWAMOU21580 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 54.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.18 Total :406.44 122401 11/18/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU21565 Sewer - S/S TruBolts Sewer - S/S TruBolts 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.86 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.75 Total :8.61 122402 11/18/2010 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1896074 17983 COPPER TUBE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 168.24 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 15.98 179831896187 STEEL PIPE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 79.78 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.58 16Page: Packet Page 44 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :271.5812240211/18/2010 009815 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 122403 11/18/2010 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0272856 Sewer - 8" Supplies Sewer - 8" Supplies 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 126.36 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 25.32 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.41 Total :166.09 122404 11/18/2010 011900 FRONTIER 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 41.81 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 41.15 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER425-775-1344 BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHING PIER 001.000.640.574.350.420.00 53.72 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM425-776-5316 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MODEM 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 108.90 Total :245.58 122405 11/18/2010 011900 FRONTIER 425 771 5553 03 0210 1014522641 07 AUTO DIALER 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 94.79 03 0210 1079569413 10425 NW1-0060 AURO DIALER 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.47 03 0210 1099569419 02425NW1-0155 TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 218.12 Total :354.38 122406 11/18/2010 011900 FRONTIER 425-197-0932 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS~ Numbers 17Page: Packet Page 45 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122406 11/18/2010 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS~ Numbers 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 260.92 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS~ Numbers 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 260.91 SEWER - PW TELEMETRY425-774-1031 SEWER - PW TELEMETRY 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 45.93 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE425-776-1281 LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 41.81 1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530 1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.75 Total :650.32 122407 11/18/2010 068265 FRONTIER ONLINE 21787976 WATER - BROADBAND SERVICE Water- Broadband Service 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 79.99 Total :79.99 122408 11/18/2010 073496 FULLER, MELE FULLER1115 REFUND REFUND - INSUFFICIENT REGISTRATION 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 63.00 Total :63.00 122409 11/18/2010 069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC BINV0002446 EDMOC01 PUMP/TUBING ELEMENTS/LEAK DETECTOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7,086.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 53.49 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 585.45 EDMOC01BINV0002465 SENSOR PAD 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 185.00 18Page: Packet Page 46 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122409 11/18/2010 (Continued)069571 GOBLE SAMPSON ASSOCIATES INC Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 26.12 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 17.32 Total :7,953.38 122410 11/18/2010 073459 GOETZ, CHRISTINE GOETZ13212 HOLIDAY CARDS ... HOLIDAY CARDS, ETC. #13212 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 90.00 Total :90.00 122411 11/18/2010 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 097532 Unit 126 - 4 Tires Unit 126 - 4 Tires 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 473.28 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.96 Total :518.24 122412 11/18/2010 072515 GOOGLE INC 1803499 INTERNET ANTI-VIRUS & SPAM MAINT FEE Internet Anti-Virus & Spam Maint Fee 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 523.33 Total :523.33 122413 11/18/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9377924932 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauges Unit 46 - Pressure Gauges 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 53.46 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.07 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauges9377924940 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauges 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 53.46 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.07 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauge9378154224 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauge 19Page: Packet Page 47 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122413 11/18/2010 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.73 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.54 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauge9378209341 Unit 46 - Pressure Gauge 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.73 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.30 Unit 46 - Compound Gauge9378659545 Unit 46 - Compound Gauge 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.86 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60 Total :179.82 122414 11/18/2010 012355 GRCC/BAT B1862/B1917 BAT Certifications 2011 Renewal for J BAT Certifications 2011 Renewal for J 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 84.00 Total :84.00 122415 11/18/2010 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 112298 Unit 337 - Motor Assembly Unit 337 - Motor Assembly 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 58.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.52 Unit 648 - Lever Assembly112414 Unit 648 - Lever Assembly 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.66 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.20 Unit 129 - Trans Lever112469 Unit 129 - Trans Lever 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 46.66 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.43 20Page: Packet Page 48 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122415 11/18/2010 (Continued)012900 HARRIS FORD INC Unit 129 - Cover & Cont112474 Unit 129 - Cover & Cont 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 62.39 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.93 Unit 424 - Instrument Cluster112513 Unit 424 - Instrument Cluster 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 278.75 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.48 Unit 720 - Blind Rivets112557 Unit 720 - Blind Rivets 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.37 Unit 336 - Shaft Assembly112632 Unit 336 - Shaft Assembly 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 500.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 47.55 Unit 338 - Rear Axel Oil112648 Unit 338 - Rear Axel Oil 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 71.04 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.75 Unit 648 - Glas Run Asy112700 Unit 648 - Glas Run Asy 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 126.14 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.98 Total :1,281.85 122416 11/18/2010 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 83 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 219.20 21Page: Packet Page 49 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :219.2012241611/18/2010 064721 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 122417 11/18/2010 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 23456 E8FD.SERVICES THRU 10/29/10 E8FD.Services thru 10/29/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 4,504.12 Total :4,504.12 122418 11/18/2010 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 82 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 23.00 Total :23.00 122419 11/18/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1033872 6035322500959949 LUMBER/STUDS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 39.65 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.77 60353225009599492089001 PIPE BUSHING/ADAPTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 37.81 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.59 60353225009599495047963 BOLT/CLAMPS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.88 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.70 60353225009599496065525 CLR CLEANER 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 95.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.59 9.11 60353225009599496131269 SOAP DISH 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.98 9.5% Sales Tax 22Page: Packet Page 50 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122419 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.14 60353225009599498087594 SOIL SWEET 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 237.15 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 22.53 Total :482.23 122420 11/18/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1044375 Fac Maint - Supplies Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.52 Fac Maint Truck Supplies1048569 Fac Maint Truck Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.24 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.25 Water - Supplies1072362 Water - Supplies 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 131.53 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.50 FAC - Supplies2082534 FAC - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.12 Museum - Motion Light, Photo Eye2560486 Museum - Motion Light, Photo Eye 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 109.75 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.43 PS - Repair Supplies3033492 PS - Repair Supplies 23Page: Packet Page 51 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122420 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.21 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.34 Sewer - Supplies3035099 Sewer - Supplies 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.52 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.47 FAC - Cedar Supplies for Sauna Repairs3035211 FAC - Cedar Supplies for Sauna Repairs 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.66 PS - Repair Supplies3043916 PS - Repair Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 70.56 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.70 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Truck Supplies33992 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Truck Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 25.12 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.39 Sewer - Wisk Broom34088 Sewer - Wisk Broom 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.49 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.43 FAC - Supplies40038 FAC - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 28.93 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.75 Fac Maint Shop - 24' FG Ext4034976 Fac Maint Shop - 24' FG Ext 24Page: Packet Page 52 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122420 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 229.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 21.76 FAC - Wood for Sauna Repair4046051 FAC - Wood for Sauna Repair 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 97.16 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.23 Museum - Paint Supplies5045618 Museum - Paint Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.60 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.44 PS - Supplies5047955 PS - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 38.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.66 PS - Supplies5080481 PS - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.78 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.93 City Hall - Supplies5561949 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.34 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.98 Traffic Control - Paint Truck Supplies5589021 Traffic Control - Paint Truck Supplies 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 37.20 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.53 25Page: Packet Page 53 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122420 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Street - Mailbox Replacements for 8815566861 Street - Mailbox Replacements for 8815 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 34.58 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 3.29 Sewer - Clamps6045492 Sewer - Clamps 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 4.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.38 Plaza Rm - Light Control6581585 Plaza Rm - Light Control 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.33 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Supplies7047406 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 70.37 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.69 Sr Center - Mortise Lock7063540 Sr Center - Mortise Lock 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.14 FAC - Supplies7090783 FAC - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.13 Water - Supplies7565368 Water - Supplies 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.68 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.01 26Page: Packet Page 54 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122420 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Storm - Flashlight, Machetes8042817 Storm - Flashlight, Machetes 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 59.88 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 5.69 City Hall - Supplies8047304 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.55 City Hall - Connectors8087366 City Hall - Connectors 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.71 Sewer - SWP Nozzles9034214 Sewer - SWP Nozzles 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.85 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.41 PS - Cleaner, Supplies9042410 PS - Cleaner, Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 30.59 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.91 MCH - Plumbing Repair Supplies9044878 MCH - Plumbing Repair Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.33 Fac Maint - Husky 4 Gal9047044 Fac Maint - Husky 4 Gal 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 149.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 14.16 27Page: Packet Page 55 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122420 11/18/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PS - Adapter9087122 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.34 PS - Adapter 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.53 Total :1,603.74 122421 11/18/2010 072065 HOODSPORT'N DIVE 10/26/10 INV# 10/16/10 - EDMONDS PD INTOVA WATERPROOF TORCH 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 270.00 misc sales tax % 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 22.68 Total :292.68 122422 11/18/2010 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 469229-1 Fleet Shop - Drill Bits, Pipe Tap Fleet Shop - Drill Bits, Pipe Tap 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 72.68 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.63 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.63 Total :87.94 122423 11/18/2010 070042 IKON 83580313 COPIER LEASE Cannon Image Runner 9/21-10/22 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 1,125.26 Total :1,125.26 122424 11/18/2010 070042 IKON 83580309 Rent on Engineering copier. Billing Rent on Engineering copier. Billing 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 443.48 Rent on large copier. Billing period83580327 Rent on large copier. Billing period 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 827.00 Total :1,270.48 28Page: Packet Page 56 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122425 11/18/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5015350747 Meter charges for large copier. Billing Meter charges for large copier. Billing 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 84.23 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 8.00 Meter charges for Engineering5015350748 Meter charges for Engineering 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 365.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 34.73 Total :492.51 122426 11/18/2010 072728 KAVADAS, JANET KAVADAS13113 PERSONAL TRAINING PERSONAL TRAINING 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 28.00 Total :28.00 122427 11/18/2010 073499 KC MARTIN AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 1014185 Unit 70 - Brake Repairs Unit 70 - Brake Repairs 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 683.53 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 64.94 Total :748.47 122428 11/18/2010 064400 KOHO, STEPHEN 1458 TRAVEL/KOHO TRAVEL/KOHO 411.000.656.538.800.430.00 1,418.99 Total :1,418.99 122429 11/18/2010 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 11122010-01 INV#11122010-01 - EDMONDS PD 24 CAR WASHES @$5.03 FOR 10/10 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 120.72 Total :120.72 122430 11/18/2010 073136 LANG, ROBERT LANG1112 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 11/12/10 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 40.00 29Page: Packet Page 57 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :40.0012243011/18/2010 073136 073136 LANG, ROBERT 122431 11/18/2010 073136 LANG, ROBERT Lang, Robert City Hall Lobby Monitor for 11/10/10 City Hall Lobby Monitor for 11/10/10 001.000.110.511.100.490.00 36.00 Total :36.00 122432 11/18/2010 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 11010-148 GLOVES NITRILE & THERMAL GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 92.40 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.11 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.26 Total :106.77 122433 11/18/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 105322I EDMCTY CALENDARS/MARKERS/COFFEE FILTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 90.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 8.64 EDMCTY105339 CALENDAR 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 10.29 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 0.98 Total :110.83 122434 11/18/2010 072320 MACK, LINDA MACK OCT 2010 MACK EXPENSE CLAIM - SHELTON OCT 2010 LODGING 10/3-10/7 AND 10/11-10/14~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 550.00 DINNER 10/3/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.15 DINNER 10/6/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 18.10 DINNER 10/4/10 30Page: Packet Page 58 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122434 11/18/2010 (Continued)072320 MACK, LINDA 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.15 DINNER 10/5/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 19.10 FUEL 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 46.30 DINNER 10/11/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 19.11 DINNER 10/12/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.15 DINNER 10/13/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 15.95 DINNER 10/7/10 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 16.67 Total :733.68 122435 11/18/2010 019583 MANPOWER INC 21250309 Receptionist coverage on 11/2/10. Receptionist coverage on 11/2/10. 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 73.04 Total :73.04 122436 11/18/2010 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 273 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 87.50 Interpreter Fee277 Interpreter Fee 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 87.50 INTERPRETER FEE280 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 87.50 INTERPRETER FEE978 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 147.50 Total :410.00 122437 11/18/2010 073500 MATSON, CYNTHIA 103110 REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO COURT TRAINING 31Page: Packet Page 59 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122437 11/18/2010 (Continued)073500 MATSON, CYNTHIA REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO COURT TRAINING 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 91.44 Total :91.44 122438 11/18/2010 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 81 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.290.00 6,048.00 Total :6,048.00 122439 11/18/2010 072918 MCDONALD, BRIAN MCDONALD1117 WORKSHOP WORKSHOP #1/COLLEGE PLACE MIDDLE SCHOOL 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 450.00 Total :450.00 122440 11/18/2010 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 69442137 123106800 TUBE FITTING/FLANGE/PIPE FITTING/BALL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 690.45 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 18.92 Total :709.37 122441 11/18/2010 069053 MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD 15227 Source document microfilm services. Source document microfilm services. 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 995.64 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 94.59 Total :1,090.23 122442 11/18/2010 063773 MICROFLEX 00019599 OCT-10 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM Oct-10 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 308.54 Total :308.54 122443 11/18/2010 067800 MICROFLEX CORP #774353 IN1181033 Fleet Shop Supplies Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 481.00 32Page: Packet Page 60 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122443 11/18/2010 (Continued)067800 MICROFLEX CORP #774353 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 45.70 Total :526.70 122444 11/18/2010 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER1117 GYM MONITOR GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 90.00 Total :90.00 122445 11/18/2010 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC WA23-239800 101690-01 BEARINGS/OIL SEALS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 75.15 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.32 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.64 Total :88.11 122446 11/18/2010 073494 NATTERSTAD, LAUREN 103110 REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO COURT TRAINING REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO COURT TRAINING 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 57.10 Total :57.10 122447 11/18/2010 063034 NCL 277739 13465 LAB SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 489.35 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 21.74 Total :511.09 122448 11/18/2010 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0440722-IN Fleet Shop Filter Fleet Shop Filter 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.88 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.04 Fleet Oil Filter Inventory0440723-IN 33Page: Packet Page 61 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122448 11/18/2010 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM Fleet Oil Filter Inventory 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 83.22 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 7.90 Total :103.04 122449 11/18/2010 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 16197 260 SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 933.80 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 88.71 Total :1,022.51 122450 11/18/2010 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-214134 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: PINE STREET 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 189.87 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-214135 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: SIERRA PARK 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 189.87 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-216687 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: MARINA BEACH 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 792.51 Total :1,172.25 122451 11/18/2010 073497 O'CONNOR, MICHELLE O'CONNOR1115 REFUND REFUND - CUSTOMER REQUEST 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 33.00 Total :33.00 122452 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 658133 INV#658133 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD MO PLANNER - COMPAAN 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.71 AT A GLANCE MO PLANNER-HOVORKA 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.84 MO DESK PAD -THOMPSON 34Page: Packet Page 62 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122452 11/18/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.42 QUICK NOTE DESK PAD-EAGER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.78 WALL CALENDAR-MANDEVILLE 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 13.44 MO DESK PAD-MANDEVILLE 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 17.54 AT A GLANCE MO PLA-MANDEVILLE 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 11.71 MO DESK PADS-PATROL RM 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 28.70 QUICK NOTES MO PLAN-FROLAND 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 15.42 DESK PAD-ROTH 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.90 AT A GLANCE DESK PAD-MARSH 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 7.42 QUICK NOTES DESK PAD-MACK 001.000.410.521.710.310.00 11.78 HP INK 57 TRI COLOR 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 31.58 Q NOTES DESK-MCINTYRE/SUTTON 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 23.56 WALL CALENDAR-BROMAN 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 9.98 DESK PADS-DAWSON/SHOEMAKE 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 14.84 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 4.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 5.75 9.5% Sales Tax 35Page: Packet Page 63 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122452 11/18/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC 001.000.410.521.710.310.00 1.12 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 5.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 0.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.700.310.00 1.39 Total :260.20 122453 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 540257 Toner Toner 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 124.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 11.80 Total :135.97 122454 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 675786 COPY PAPER, CALCULATOR, TAPE Copy paper, calculator, tape 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 451.23 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 42.87 ARCHIVE BOXES676085 Archive boxes 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 105.33 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 10.01 Total :609.44 122455 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 720488 COLORED COPY PAPER BLUE COPY PAPER 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 10.34 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.98 Total :11.32 36Page: Packet Page 64 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122456 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 597661 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 157.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 15.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES719266 Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 365.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 34.70 Total :572.84 122457 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 629569 Fleet - (2) Ink for Printer Fleet - (2) Ink for Printer 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 54.12 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.15 Total :59.27 122458 11/18/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 427224 Backordered calendar for Pat. Backordered calendar for Pat. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 8.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 0.78 Total :9.03 122459 11/18/2010 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 687505 OCT-10 LITIGATION FEES Oct-10 Legal Fees 001.000.360.515.100.410.00 21,845.45 OCT-10 RETAINER & LEGAL FEES687506 October 2010 retainer fees 001.000.360.515.100.410.00 15,327.57 Total :37,173.02 122460 11/18/2010 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 687506 Oct 2010 Legislative Legal Fees Oct 2010 Legislative Legal Fees 37Page: Packet Page 65 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122460 11/18/2010 (Continued)025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 6,409.00 Total :6,409.00 122461 11/18/2010 073221 ORCHID CELLMARK INC 010-052927 INV#010-052927 - EDMONDS PD EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-1556 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 815.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-2127 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 570.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #09-4335 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 570.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-3015 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 570.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-3004 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 570.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-1642 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 285.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-1611 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 530.00 EVIDENCE SAMPLES CASE #10-2078 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 285.00 CR OVERCHARGE OF SEPT INVOICES010-052927 CR OVERCHGS FROM 09/10 INVOICES 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 -195.00 Total :4,000.00 122462 11/18/2010 073478 ORRCO 315798 Fleet Shop Recycled Deisel Fleet Shop Recycled Deisel 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 85.00 Total :85.00 122463 11/18/2010 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00058255 Unit 55 - Suction Hose Unit 55 - Suction Hose 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,019.32 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 50.50 38Page: Packet Page 66 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122463 11/18/2010 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 101.63 Unit 55 - Returned Suction Hose00058255 Unit 55 - Returned Suction Hose 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -1,019.32 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -96.84 Total :55.29 122464 11/18/2010 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 109160 CLEAN GREEN DUMP CLEAN GREEN DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 80.00 CLEAN GREEN DUMP109171 CLEAN GREEN DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 80.00 BRUSH DUMP109186 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 80.00 Total :240.00 122465 11/18/2010 027280 PATRICKS PRINTING 39860 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 423.34 Total :423.34 122466 11/18/2010 073231 POLYDYNE INC 568481 101859 POLYMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.51 1,859.00 Total :1,859.00 122467 11/18/2010 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 187906 2000 UPS/CITY OF TACOMA 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 2.75 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 0.14 39Page: Packet Page 67 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :2.8912246711/18/2010 071811 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 122468 11/18/2010 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 10 045S 4Q 2010 ACCOUNT NO. EDMO005 4Q 2010 Clean Air Assessment per RCW 001.000.390.531.700.510.00 6,045.75 Total :6,045.75 122469 11/18/2010 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52 Total :138.52 122470 11/18/2010 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 7500 PUBLIC DEFENDER PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 1,000.00 Total :1,000.00 122471 11/18/2010 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION 7288 Unit 582 - Mic Repair & Shipping Unit 582 - Mic Repair & Shipping 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 190.10 Total :190.10 122472 11/18/2010 069693 SHANNON, GEORGE SHANNON1119 FEATURED CHILDREN'S AUTHOR FEATURED AUTHOR FOR "BEST BOOK" POSTER 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 165.00 Total :165.00 122473 11/18/2010 068177 SHRM 9003643175 Debi Humann - SHRM membership (2/1/11 - Debi Humann - SHRM membership (2/1/11 - 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 180.00 Total :180.00 122474 11/18/2010 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-224166 Unit 55 - 2 Rectangle LED Flashers Unit 55 - 2 Rectangle LED Flashers 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 117.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.16 40Page: Packet Page 68 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122474 11/18/2010 (Continued)036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC Unit 649 - Wheel14-224766 Unit 649 - Wheel 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 66.15 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.28 Total :201.09 122475 11/18/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200869246 PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 143.45 23700 104TH AVE W2011-8453-8 23700 104TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 155.95 PLAYFIELD LIGHTS201453057 PLAYFIELD LIGHTS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 628.32 Total :927.72 122476 11/18/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 130218223 2019-2991-6 23219 74TH AVE W/BALLINGER 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.32 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.70 2025-7952-0130219297 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 7.61 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.46 Total :38.09 122477 11/18/2010 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY SOW5007 INV#SOW5007 - EDMONDS PD SOLID WASTE CHG/ NITRIC ACID 001.000.410.521.100.490.00 1.00 Total :1.00 122478 11/18/2010 067809 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FINANCE I000256352 1ST HALF 2010 SERS OPERATING ASSESSMENT 41Page: Packet Page 69 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122478 11/18/2010 (Continued)067809 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FINANCE 2nd half-2010 SERS Operating Assessment 001.000.390.525.600.510.00 94,962.79 Total :94,962.79 122479 11/18/2010 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2010-490 INV#2010-490 EDMONDS PD 60.95 BOOKINGS - OCT 2010 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,485.50 534.5 HOUSING DAYS - OCT 2010 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 33,406.25 Total :38,891.75 122480 11/18/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103587 DISPOSAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE DISPOSAL SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 569.63 Total :569.63 122481 11/18/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 29.95 Total :29.95 122482 11/18/2010 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2981136 Water / Sewer - T Wipers, Safety Water / Sewer - T Wipers, Safety 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 185.78 Water / Sewer - T Wipers, Safety 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 185.77 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 17.65 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 17.64 Water / Sewer - Safety Glasses2983748 Water / Sewer - Safety Glasses 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 6.68 Water / Sewer - Safety Glasses 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.67 42Page: Packet Page 70 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122482 11/18/2010 (Continued)009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.64 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.63 Total :421.46 122483 11/18/2010 040300 STEVENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL STEVENS1115 REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND OF PLAZA ROOM DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00 Total :500.00 122484 11/18/2010 073498 TAI, SHU-HUA TAI1115 REFUND REFUND DUE TO INSUFFICIENT REGISTRATION 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 60.00 Total :60.00 122485 11/18/2010 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 54000 Fleet - Work T Shirts Fleet - Work T Shirts 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 115.75 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 11.00 Total :126.75 122486 11/18/2010 060167 TEREX UTILITIES 020-148358 Fleet - ANSI Annual Areal Inspection Fleet - ANSI Annual Areal Inspection 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 4,249.71 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 403.72 Total :4,653.43 122487 11/18/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 148134 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 162.40 RFQ/RFP - LEGAL NOTICE (CITY ATTY)1716736 RFQ/RFP - Legal notice (City Atty) 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 34.16 43Page: Packet Page 71 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :196.5612248711/18/2010 009350 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 122488 11/18/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1716313 NEWSPAPER ADS 11/16 Hearing (PRD) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 57.40 NEWSPAPER ADS1716314 11/16 Hearing (Sprinklers) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 50.68 NEWSPAPER ADS1716315 Ordinance 3813 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 40.60 NEWSPAPER ADS1717039 Ordinance 3815 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 32.20 NEWSPAPER ADS1717040 Ordinance 3814 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.88 NEWSPAPER ADS1717042 Ordinance 3816 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 37.24 Total :252.00 122489 11/18/2010 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 295987 Unit 31 - Springs for Hose Reel Unit 31 - Springs for Hose Reel 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 31.90 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.16 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.37 Total :50.43 122490 11/18/2010 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 042483000 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 1,642.30 Total :1,642.30 122491 11/18/2010 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 42227 CHAINLINK MATERIALS 44Page: Packet Page 72 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122491 11/18/2010 (Continued)041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC CHAINLINK MATERIALS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.02 Total :23.22 122492 11/18/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8603048 Water Meter - m-meter-0.625-010 Water Meter - m-meter-0.625-010 411.000.654.534.800.342.00 4,545.90 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.342.00 431.86 Total :4,977.76 122493 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 8313 ENG CREDIT CARD OCTOBER 2010 Eng. Credit Card.October 2010. ITE 001.000.620.532.200.430.00 25.00 Eng. Credit Card.October 2010. ITE 001.000.620.532.200.490.00 51.30 Total :76.30 122494 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 1070 INV#1070 11/08/10 -THOMPSON - EDMONDS PD 1500 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FORMS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 410.60 SOLO BISTRO DRINK CUPS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 82.34 RETIREMENT PLAQUE ASSINK 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 87.60 6X9 POLY ZIP BAGS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 54.81 9X12 POLY ZIP BAGS 001.000.410.521.910.310.00 105.10 SANDISK MEMORY CARD 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 66.01 LASER CHG FOR RADAR GUN 001.000.410.521.710.310.00 5.47 45Page: Packet Page 73 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122494 11/18/2010 (Continued)062693 US BANK 2010CD-ROM RCW 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 42.71 2010 CD-ROM WAC 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 42.70 LODGING/COLL INV - MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 275.00 UNIVERSAL 3" BINDERS 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 241.37 INV#3215 11/08/10 - COMPAAN - EDMONDS PD3215 FUEL/COLL INVEST - MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 45.37 MEAL/COLL INVEST- MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 13.55 MEAL/COLL INVEST - MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 18.94 FUEL/COLL INVEST - MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 43.10 LODGING/COLL INVEST- MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 275.00 MEAL/COLL INVEST - MACK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 20.27 INV#3314 11/08/10 - LAWLESS - EDMONDS PD3314 FERRY CHG CASE #10-4187 001.000.410.521.210.430.00 42.45 INV#3512 11/08/10 - TRAINING-EDMONDS PD3512 LIGHT BULBS FOR DV CO-ORD 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 168.12 FUEL/MTG - LP MILLER 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 29.89 LOGDING/ MTG - LP MILLER 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 139.75 5 GAL BUCKETS W/LID FOR AMMO 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 38.54 MEAL/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 46Page: Packet Page 74 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122494 11/18/2010 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 44.45 FUEL/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 22.25 MEAL/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 56.92 FUEL/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 28.00 LODGING/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 236.13 MEAL/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 14.29 MEA/ARMORER CLASS - LIM 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.00 INV#3520 11/08/10 - TRAINING -EDMONDS PD3520 FUEL/ADV K-9 - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 62.49 MEAL/ADV K-9 - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 34.74 FUEL/ADV K-9 - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 58.67 MEAL/ADV K-9 - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 21.21 LODGING/ADV K-9 - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 291.60 Total :3,129.44 122495 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 3280 EOC/CEMP binders EOC/CEMP binders 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 239.37 RFQ/RFP - City Atty 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00 Total :264.37 122496 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 2143 WIFI ANTENNA, SERVER, SMART ADAPTER C Crane - WiFi USb adapter, Antenna, 47Page: Packet Page 75 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122496 11/18/2010 (Continued)062693 US BANK 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 157.75 HP Direct - HP 90W Smart Auto Adapter 001.000.620.532.200.350.00 108.41 Domain name registration 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 25.90 Sillworks.com - Server drive for web 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 89.95 WFOA TRAINING,GFOA WEBINAR,TIGERDIRECT,3470 QuestionPro.com Citizen Survey 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 16.00 Shoplet.com - perf recycled pads, self 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 70.46 WFOA Cash Basis Gov't Acct training, 001.000.310.514.230.490.00 365.00 ServerSupply.com - HP/Compaq 72.8GB 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 32.00 UPS return freight charges 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 36.36 PrinterTechs - HP Lazerjet 4100 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 200.84 TigerDirect.com - Sanus medium full 001.000.620.532.200.350.00 336.40 CDW Government - Swipe reader mini 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 82.35 CDW Government - 5 ea 4GB USB 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 97.30 Total :1,618.72 122497 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 3306 TRAVEL/ZUVELA TRAVEL/ZUVELA 411.000.656.538.800.430.00 993.75 LAB GLOVES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 950.00 Total :1,943.75 48Page: Packet Page 76 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122498 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 244928003 CITY CLERK PURCHASE CARD Misc recorded documents 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 222.00 Recording of Utility Liens 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 806.00 Recording of Utility Liens 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 806.00 Total :1,834.00 122499 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 3405 Setpm - Museum - Accessible Entrance Setpm - Museum - Accessible Entrance 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 80.65 ACR - Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.350.00 135.00 Guardian Sec - Old PW Alarm Monitoring 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 55.00 Franklin Covey - Planner 2011 Refill -3546 Franklin Covey - Planner 2011 Refill - 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 36.08 UPSP - Sewer - Cues Returns 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 31.75 USPS - Fleet - ProVision Return 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 5.24 Total :343.72 122500 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 6045 Registration for Leif Bjorback for the Registration for Leif Bjorback for the 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 25.00 Total :25.00 122501 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 3389 Refreshments for Council Meetings Refreshments for Council Meetings 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 19.68 Total :19.68 122502 11/18/2010 062693 US BANK 3249 HOTEL ROOM FOR COURT TRAINING FOR 49Page: Packet Page 77 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122502 11/18/2010 (Continued)062693 US BANK HOTEL ROOM FOR COURT TRAINING FOR 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 218.80 HOTEL ROOM FOR COURT TRAINING FOR MATSON 001.000.230.512.500.430.00 218.80 PASSPORT APPLICATION MAILING 001.000.230.512.500.420.00 95.00 Total :532.60 122503 11/18/2010 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0337021-WA Fitness for duty testing (PD) Fitness for duty testing (PD) 001.000.220.516.210.410.00 115.00 Total :115.00 122504 11/18/2010 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 687-176543 Sewer - DOT Sewer - DOT 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 65.00 Total :65.00 122505 11/18/2010 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 263366 Sewer LS 7 - Manhole Safety Platform Sewer LS 7 - Manhole Safety Platform 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 449.00 Freight 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 22.07 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 44.75 Water - Pipeline and Valve Decals268496 Water - Pipeline and Valve Decals 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 49.60 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.58 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.81 Total :582.81 122506 11/18/2010 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 0100114 Utility locates 50Page: Packet Page 78 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 51 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122506 11/18/2010 (Continued)044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR Utility locates 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 78.00 Utility locates 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 78.00 Utility locates 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 80.35 Total :236.35 122507 11/18/2010 065269 VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC 2202730033 Unit 20 - Repairs Unit 20 - Repairs 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 709.32 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 58.16 Total :767.48 122508 11/18/2010 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 43738880 1066294 LAB SUPPLIES 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 179.13 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 9.64 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 17.94 Total :206.71 122509 11/18/2010 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL T1100037 EDM301 T1100037 - MACK COLL. RECONSTRUCT COLLISION RECONSTRUCT - CLASSRM 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 149.40 COLLISION RECONSTRUCT - SURCHG 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 119.40 COURSE MATERIALS 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 30.00 LUNCHES DURING CLASS 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 160.00 Total :458.80 51Page: Packet Page 79 of 145 11/18/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 52 8:42:31AM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 122510 11/18/2010 047665 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 1554 MEMBERSHIP/ZUVELA/WEF MEMBERSHIP/ZUVELA/WEF 411.000.656.538.800.490.00 160.00 Total :160.00 122511 11/18/2010 068227 WCCFA 917 CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONS CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONS FOR CLIFF 130.000.640.536.200.490.00 275.00 Total :275.00 122512 11/18/2010 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 821730321 CODE UPDATES RCW Updates 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 136.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 12.97 Total :149.47 122513 11/18/2010 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 821687048 RCW UPDATES RCW Supplements 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 417.20 Total :417.20 Bank total :415,757.40156 Vouchers for bank code :front 415,757.40Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report156 52Page: Packet Page 80 of 145 AM-3557   Item #: 2. D. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:Consent   Submitted By:Sandy Chase Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type:Action  Information Subject Title Confirm appointment of Tom Walker to the Architectural Design Board. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council confirm the Mayor's appointment of Tom Walker to the Architectural Design Board. Previous Council Action On November 16, 2010, the City Council interviewed Mr. Walker. Narrative Attached is a copy of Mr. Walker's application for appointment to the ADB. Attachments Application Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Mike Cooper 11/19/2010 09:52 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 09:57 AM Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 11/19/2010 08:17 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 81 of 145 Packet Page 82 of 145 AM-3554   Item #: 2. E. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:Consent   Submitted For:City Council Submitted By:Rob Chave Department:Planning Review Committee: Committee Action: Type:Action  Information Subject Title Adoption of Ordinance amending the Edmonds Community Development Code requiring that interior lot lines not overlap PRD perimeter buffers. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the final ordinance (Exhibit 1). Previous Council Action Council held a public hearing on November 16, 2010, and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for final Council adoption. Narrative Council held a public hearing on November 16, 2010, and directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for final Council adoption. The attached ordinance (Exhibit 1) finalizes the Council's action. Attachments Exhibit 1: Final ordinance Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/18/2010 03:26 PM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 11/18/2010 03:18 PM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 83 of 145 {BFP779770.DOC;1\00006.150243\ } - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.35.080(a)(4) AND 20.35.050(C)(2) RELATING TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO ALLOW CLOSED RECORD ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF PRELIMINARY PRD DECISION AND TO ELIMINATE OVERLAP OF PERIMETER BUFFERS AND SETBACKS FOR EXTERIOR LOT LINES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, preliminary planned residential development (PRD) decisions are issued by the Hearing Examiner upon recommendation by the Architectural Design Board on site and building designs; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to afford the opportunity for closed record appeals on preliminary PRD decisions issued by the hearing examiner; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes eliminate ambiguity on whether setbacks for exterior lot lines and perimeter buffers can overlap; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subsection 20.35.080(A)(4) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. The Public Hearing with the Hearing Examiner. The hearing examiner shall review the proposed PRD for compliance with this section as a Type III-B decision. If, after all appeals are exhausted, the proposal is denied, a similar plan for the site may not be submitted to the development services department for one year. A new plan which varies substantially from the denied proposal, as determined by the development services director, or one Packet Page 84 of 145 {BFP779770.DOC;1\00006.150243\ } - 2 - that satisfies the objections stated by the final decision- maker may be submitted at any time. An applicant who intends to subdivide the land for sale as part of the project shall obtain subdivision approval in accordance with Chapter 20.75 ECDC before any building permit or authorization to begin construction is issued, and before sale of any portion of the property. The preferred method is for the applicant to process the subdivision application concurrently with the planned residential development proposal. Section 2. Subsection 20.35.050(C)(2) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. In addition to the setback required by the underlying zone [See ECDC 20.35.040(B)], provide a landscape buffer, open space or passive use recreational area (hereafter “buffer”). The depth of the buffer shall be at least equal to the depth of the rear yard setback applicable to the zone; provided that, where the exterior lot line abuts a public way, the buffer shall be at least equal to the depth of the front yard setback required by the zone. The depth of the buffer shall be measured perpendicular to the boundary of the exterior property line setback. If such a buffer is provided, interior setbacks may be flexible and determined in accord with ECDC 20.35.030. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE COOPER ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 85 of 145 {BFP779770.DOC;1\00006.150243\ } - 3 - APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 86 of 145 {BFP779770.DOC;1\00006.150243\ } - 4 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.35.080(a)(4) AND 20.35.050(C)(2) RELATING TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO ALLOW CLOSED RECORD ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OF PRELIMINARY PRD DECISION AND TO ELIMINATE OVERLAP OF PERIMETER BUFFERS AND SETBACKS FOR EXTERIOR LOT LINES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 87 of 145 AM-3552   Item #: 3. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:5 Minutes   Submitted For:Council President Bernheim Submitted By:Sandy Chase Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type:Information  Information Subject Title Community Service Announcement: Residential energy conservation measures. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative A community service announcement will be given regarding residential energy conservation measures. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 11/18/2010 01:31 PM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 88 of 145 AM-3556   Item #: 5. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:15 Minutes   Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Department:Community Services Review Committee: Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Type:Action  Information Subject Title Discussion and potential action on a proposed Draft City of Edmonds 2011 State Legislative Agenda. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action November 1, 2010 - Mike Doubleday presented proposed Draft City of Edmonds 2011 legislative agenda.  No decision taken.  Scheduled for review by City Council Committees for November 9, 2010. November 9, 2010 - Finance, Public Safety and Community Services/Development Services Committees reviewed and discussed the Draft City of Edmonds 2011 City of Edmonds Legislative Agenda.  The following include recommended changes from the three committees and a Council member.   CSDS Committee supported revision (Top Priority):   1. Washington State Ferries • Existing Edmonds Main Street WSF Terminal Public Private Partnership and Safety  Support a continued partnership with the DOT Public Private Partnership Office to develop a workable safety solution at the Edmonds waterfront for pedestrian ferry riders.  No Expansion – Request legislative assistance in preventing Washington State Ferries from expanding the existing Edmonds Main Street WSF Terminal. • Mukilteo Multimodal Terminal Project – Request legislative assistance in preventing the reassignment of the Mukilteo/Clinton Ferry route to Edmonds. CSDS Committee recommended addition (Top Priority):   10. Extension of Public Facilities District sales and use tax credit  Support the Spokane PFD request to extend the PFD sales tax credit (.033) from 2027 to 2037. Public Safety Committee recommended deletion (Secondary Priority): Packet Page 89 of 145   6. Red Light Cameras Preserve the authority for cities to implement red light camera technology. Finance Committee recommended addition (Secondary Priority):   14. Municipal Research Services Center Support placing MRSC on firm financial footing. This could include something other than liquor profits and taxes in the future. Council member Buckshnis recommended addition (Secondary Priority): 15. Puget Sound Watershed Health and Salmon Habitat Recovery (From Water Resource Inventory Area 8 Partners) • Support request for $55 million for Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Fund in the Puget Sound Partnership budget request which includes the following salmon habitat projects from the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed: ? Cedar River Acquisitions  ? Issaquah Creek Fish Passage ? Mapes Creek Restoration (Lake Washington tributary) 6% of funding would also support watershed staffing and technical capacity to implement salmon recovery plans. • Continue Lead Entity funding: $1,451,676 for 2011-2013 biennium budget which supports local watershed staffing to manage the annual Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant process. • Support the Secure Medicine Return Bill (2SHB 1165/2SSB 5279) which would require producers of medicines sold in Washington to create and fund a convenient and safe return program for unwanted medicines from residential sources. Narrative Based on comments received from Council members during the three November 9, 2010 Council Committee meetings, the attached draft legislative agenda has been revised to include recommended changes.  Proposed changes are highlighted in red text.  Mike Doubleday will attend the November 23, 2010 City Council meeting to answer questions or to provide clarification if needed. Attachments Attachment 1 - Draft City of Edmonds 2011 State Legislative Agenda Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:21 AM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/19/2010 09:52 AM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 09:57 AM Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 11/19/2010 07:47 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 90 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 1 Edmonds 2011 State Legislative Agenda (Includes revisions based on comments from Council members during November 9, 1010 City Council Committee Meetings) TOP PRIORITY 1. Washington State Ferries • Existing Edmonds Main Street WSF Terminal Public Private Partnership and Safety Support a continued partnership with the DOT Public Private Partnership Office to develop a workable safety solution at the Edmonds waterfront for pedestrian ferry riders. No Expansion – Request legislative assistance in preventing Washington State Ferries from expanding the existing Edmonds Main Street WSF Terminal. • Mukilteo Multimodal Terminal Project – Request legislative assistance in preventing the reassignment of the Mukilteo/Clinton Ferry route to Edmonds. 2. Protect State-Shared and State-Committed Revenues Protect state-shared and committed revenues such as: • Liquor profits and taxes, • The municipal criminal justice account, • The Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF), • The Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP). 3. Local Fiscal Flexibility Packet Page 91 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 2 Support a package of local fiscal flexibility measures such as: • Unifying the uses of the first and second quarters of the local Real Estate Excise Tax (REET), including flexibility to use the local REET for parks maintenance and operations, • Additional flexibility with lodging taxes, • Reduce matching requirements for state grants, • Review statutory update schedules for land use and environmental planning updates, such as GMA, SMA, water systems and sewer plans, to determine if streamlining is possible or updates can be delayed. In addition, oppose temporary suspension of local impact fee authority. 4. Public Records Requests Support legislation to provide some relief for cities and other governmental agencies from overly burdensome public records requests. 5. Street Maintenance Utility Authority Support the Street Maintenance Utility Authority legislation as both a management tool and a funding source for local transportation systems. 6. Transportation Revenue Package Support the advancement of a statewide transportation revenue package to address infrastructure projects in Edmonds. • Edmonds’ highest transportation funding priority is the 228th/SR99 safety project. We recently were selected to receive grant funding for design and ROW acquisition for this project. Packet Page 92 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 3 • Seek support for an engineering pre-design, detailed traffic study, and ROW plan for a signature, five-legged round-a-bout at Five Corners. This project will address a significant but correctable congestion problem on the primary corridor leading into downtown Edmonds. 7. Edmonds Main Street Rebuilding Project Seek capital budget funding for the Edmonds Main Street Rebuilding Project (from 5th Avenue North to 6th Avenue North); this includes incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) techniques. 8. Phase II Storm Water Funding • Seek state funding for cities, including Edmonds, so they can continue to meet Phase II storm water requirements. • Seek a delay of further storm water requirements now scheduled for 2012. 9. LEOFF 1 Medical Costs - Oppose any further expansion of LEOFF 1 retiree medical benefits without an alternative funding source. Cities and towns are not in a position to take on any additional costs. Look for opportunities to fund ongoing LEOFF 1 retiree health care costs. 10. Extension of Public Facilities District sales and use tax credit – Support the Spokane PFD request to extend the PFD sales tax credit (.033) from 2027 to 2037. SECONDARY PRIORITY 1. Airport Siting Monitor legislation that seeks to site a new commercial airport in the Puget Sound region. Packet Page 93 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 4 2. Aerospace Industry Support the Washington Aerospace Partnership and other stakeholder groups in developing a unified strategy (e.g., training & education, research & development, Office of Aerospace and Defense, unemployment insurance tax, worker’s compensation, transportation infrastructure) to ensure that Washington State remains the leading location in the world for aerospace. Led by The Boeing Company, the aerospace industry within Snohomish County employs as many as 45,000 people, while one out of every three to six Washington State jobs is supported either directly or indirectly by the aerospace industry 3. Economic Development Support “tax-increment financing (TIF)”, a tool used by most other states to foster economic and community development to allow cities to proactively implement their comprehensive plans and to ensure local, regional and national competitiveness. 4. Driving While License Suspended Monitor legislation that reduces DWLS 3 to an infraction which will reduce the large number of DWLS 3 cases in municipal court. 5. Public Safety Authority Monitor discussion of a Public Safety Authority, a separate taxing district dedicated to police services in a city or region that could be governed by the Mayor and City Council. 6. Red Light Cameras Packet Page 94 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 5 Preserve the authority for cities to implement red light camera technology. 7. Gang Activity Support additional tools for combating gang activity including intervention and prevention activities. • Support local tools and innovation for gang prevention and intervention; seek sustainable, ongoing funding for gang prevention and intervention, graffiti removal programs, and law enforcement suppression activities. • Support the creation of new offenses for criminal gang intimidation and school criminal gang intimidation and sentence enhancements for gang-related offenses. • Support new tools for nuisance abatement and protection orders related to criminal street gang activity. 8. Vehicle Prowling Support additional penalties for vehicle prowling. 9. Business License Streamlining Monitor the discussion around local government business license streamlining. 10. Additional Revenue Authority for Transit Agencies Monitor transit agencies (including Community Transit) legislation, which likely will request additional revenue authority in order to avoid large cuts in service. 11. Preserve local government’s current ability to purchase health care insurance. Oppose any requirement to mandate participation in state-wide health insurance pools. Advocate for maintaining current authority for selecting health insurance programs. Packet Page 95 of 145 Edmonds DRAFT 2011 Leg Agenda October 12, 2010 Page 6 12. Pensions Support level/stable contribution rates for cities that do not fluctuate with economic “boom/bust” cycles. In addition, consider pursuing a deferral of any increase in employer contributions from July 2011 to January 2012. 13. Lake Ballinger capital funding request ? 14. Municipal Research Services Center Support placing MRSC on firm financial footing. This could include something other than liquor profits and taxes in the future. 15. Puget Sound Watershed Health and Salmon Habitat Recovery (From Water Resource Inventory Area 8 Partners) • Support request for $55 million for Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Fund in the Puget Sound Partnership budget request which includes the following salmon habitat projects from the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed:  Cedar River Acquisitions  Issaquah Creek Fish Passage  Mapes Creek Restoration (Lake Washington tributary) 6% of funding would also support watershed staffing and technical capacity to implement salmon recovery plans. • Continue Lead Entity funding: $1,451,676 for 2011-2013 biennium budget which supports local watershed staffing to manage the annual Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant process. • Support the Secure Medicine Return Bill (2SHB 1165/2SSB 5279) which would require producers of medicines sold in Washington to create and fund a convenient and safe return program for unwanted medicines from residential sources. Packet Page 96 of 145 AM-3555   Item #: 6. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:15 Minutes   Submitted By:Lorenzo Hines Department:Finance Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Type:Action  Information Subject Title Discussion and potential action on the final ordinance amending the 2009-2010 Budget. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve Previous Council Action Reviewed by the Finance Committee on 11-09-10. Narrative The attached amendment is necessary to account for additional revenues/expenditures, interfund and intrafund adjustments. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2010 Revenue: Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: The attachment amendment requests an additional $1.2 million in expenditure authority, summarized as follows: 001 - General Fund $218K 411 - Combined Utility $1.0 million Rest of Funds ($51K) Attachments Ordinance and Support Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/18/2010 04:05 PM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Lorenzo Hines Started On: 11/18/2010  Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 97 of 145 R:\BUDGET\BUDGET AMENDMENT\2010\NOVEMBER AMENDMENT DOCUMENTS\NOVEMBER AMENDING ORDINANCE.DOCX ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3711 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2010 Budget; and WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 3711 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2010 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in “Exhibit A” adopted herein by reference. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take Packet Page 98 of 145 ii effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR, MIKE COOPER ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY ___ W. SCOTT SNYDER, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 99 of 145 iii SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3711 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 100 of 145 iv EXHIBIT“A:” BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND 2010 2010 FUND FUND BEGINNING REVENUE EXPENDITURES ENDING NO. DESCRIPTION CASH CASH 001 GENERAL FUND 2,175,670 35,567,645 35,718,908 2,024,407 006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 1,927,600 0 0 1,927,600 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 512,176 387,566 465,161 434,581 010 PUBLIC SAFETY EMERGENCY RESERVE 0 1,334,693 0 1,334,693 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 131,976 28,500 74,115 86,361 111 STREET FUND 319,008 1,539,574 1,537,232 321,350 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE -184,393 2,172,797 1,982,560 5,844 113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 51,542 3,000,000 3,000,000 51,542 116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42,035 412,438 454,473 0 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 374,547 115,540 110,425 379,662 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 17,570 400 0 17,970 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 181,037 67,530 86,883 161,684 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 93,897 27,500 26,086 95,311 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 17,166 3,464 4,307 16,323 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 50,855 19,368 23,985 46,238 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 1,570,016 775,356 1,942,000 403,372 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 442,755 764,397 956,796 250,356 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 172,069 32,281 15,259 189,091 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 3,052 239,910 242,110 852 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 94,066 208,630 151,289 151,407 131 FIRE DONATIONS 22,462 2,800 22,466 2,796 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 24,007 1,789,000 1,784,000 29,007 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 144,281 3,760 25,403 122,638 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 766,066 31,223 0 797,289 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,181 21,400 21,000 11,581 211 LID FUND CONTROL 6,337 107,500 113,300 537 213 LID GUARANTY FUND 50,233 60,000 0 110,233 234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 0 452,160 452,160 0 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 6,861,160 14,106,473 18,367,154 2,600,479 412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 1,852,225 7,858,332 6,823,600 2,886,957 414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 51,152 2,782,176 2,743,588 89,740 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 4,709,059 2,138,757 2,892,423 3,955,393 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 284,951 103,782 125,048 263,685 631 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 0 750,000 750,000 0 Totals 22,775,758 76,904,952 80,911,731 18,768,979 Packet Page 101 of 145 v EXHIBIT “B”: BUDGET AMENDMENTS BY EXPENDITURE ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. 2010 FUND FUND 3711 3771 3809 Amended NO. DESCRIPTION 12/2/2008 12/15/2009 10/17/2010 11/16/2010 Budget 001 GENERAL FUND 35,768,808 (1,321,294) 1,053,826 217,568 35,718,908 006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 0 0 0 0 0 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 465,161 0 0 0 465,161 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 74,115 0 0 0 74,115 010 PUBLIC SAFETY EMERGENCY RESERVE 0 0 0 0 0 111 STREET FUND 1,537,232 0 0 0 1,537,232 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,332,560 0 0 -350,000 1,982,560 113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,000,000 116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 205,200 0 249,273 0 454,473 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 110,425 0 0 0 110,425 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 0 0 0 0 0 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 77,883 0 4,000 5,000 86,883 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,086 0 0 0 26,086 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,400 0 0 907 4,307 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 22,100 0 0 1,885 23,985 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 1,190,000 0 552,000 200,000 1,942,000 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 956,796 0 0 0 956,796 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 750 0 6,100 8,409 15,259 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 0 0 242,110 0 242,110 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROV 151,289 0 0 0 151,289 131 FIRE DONATIONS 0 0 22,466 0 22,466 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 1,784,000 0 0 0 1,784,000 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 0 0 0 25,403 25,403 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 0 0 0 0 0 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 21,000 0 0 0 21,000 211 LID FUND CONTROL 55,300 0 0 58,000 113,300 213 LID GUARANTY FUND 0 0 0 0 0 234 LTGO BOND DEBT SERVICE FUND 452,160 0 0 0 452,160 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 15,301,171 0 2,029,183 1,036,800 18,367,154 412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 6,823,600 0 0 0 6,823,600 414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 571,412 0 2,172,176 0 2,743,588 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,702,193 0 1,190,230 0 2,892,423 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 125,048 0 0 0 125,048 631 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 0 0 750,000 0 750,000 Totals 72,757,689 (1,321,294) 8,271,364 1,203,972 80,911,731 Packet Page 102 of 145 vi EXHIBIT “C”: BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Department BARS Category Debit Credit Description on Summary Sheet General Fund 001 000 000 313 100 000 00 Sales & Use Tax 1,000,000 Reduction of Sales Tax Revenue Estimate General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 1,000,000 Police 001 000 410 521 710 350 00 Small Equipment 985 Grant for Radar Purchases Police 001 000 410 521 710 350 01 Small Equipment 985 General Fund 001 000 000 334 030 500 00 Grants 1,970 Police 001 000 410 521 710 120 00 Overtime 2,645 Slow Down or Pay Up July 2010 General Fund 001 000 000 333 020 601 00 Grants 2,645 Police 001 000 410 521 710 120 00 Overtime 2,125 DUI and Target Zero Enforcement General Fund 001 000 000 333 020 601 00 Grants 2,125 Police 001 000 410 521 710 120 00 Overtime 1,757 X-52 DUI Enforcement General Fund 001 000 000 333 020 601 00 Grants 1,757 Police 001 000 410 521 710 120 00 Overtime 1,465 X-52 Speed Grant General Fund 001 000 000 333 020 601 00 Grants 1,465 Police 001 000 410 521 100 350 00 Small Equipment 4,210 Byrne Grant Funding Police 001 000 410 521 220 350 00 Small Equipment 8,436 General Fund 001 000 000 331 160 580 00 Grants 12,646 City Attorney 001 000 360 515 100 410 00 Professional Services 144,250 Unbudgeted Attorney Costs General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 144,250 Parks & Recreation 001 000 640 575 510 110 00 Salaries 15,000 Aquatic Salaries General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 15,000 Parks & Recreation 001 000 640 575 530 430 00 Travel 457 Senior Adventures Field Trip Fees Parks & Recreation 001 000 640 575 530 490 00 Miscellaneous 603 General Fund 001 000 000 347 600 000 00 Program Fees 1,060 Parks & Recreation 001 000 640 574 200 490 00 Miscellaneous 50,000 Merchant Bankcard Fees Police 001 000 410 521 110 490 00 Miscellaneous 150 Court 001 000 230 512 500 490 00 Miscellaneous 14,500 General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 64,650 Stormwater 411 000 652 542 900 490 00 Miscellaneous 8,100 Water 411 000 654 534 800 490 00 Miscellaneous 12,200 Sewer 411 000 655 535 800 490 00 Miscellaneous 16,500 Utility Fund 411 000 654 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 36,800 Water 411 000 654 597 412 550 00 Interfund Transfer 800,000 Transfers from Operations to Capital Stormwater 411 000 652 597 412 550 00 Interfund Transfer 200,000 Utility Fund 411 000 654 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 1,000,000 Water Construction 412 100 000 397 411 000 00 Interfund Transfer 800,000 Water Construction 412 100 630 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 800,000 Stormwater Construction 412 200 000 397 411 000 00 Interfund Transfer 200,000 Stormwater Construction 412 200 630 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 200,000 Street Construction 112 200 630 595 330 650 00 Construction Projects 350,000 Decrease Construction Project Costs Street Construction 112 200 630 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 350,000 Youth Scholarship 122 000 640 574 100 490 00 Miscellaneous 907 Youth Scholarships-Increase Awards Youth Scholarship 122 000 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 907 Tourism Promotion Arts 123 000 640 573 100 440 00 Advertising 1,885 Adjustment for grant Tourism Promotion Arts 123 000 000 337 070 000 00 Grants 1,885 Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 640 575 500 310 00 Supplies 4,800 127 Fund Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 000 367 000 000 00 Donations 23,920 Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 19,120 Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 640 575 500 410 00 Professional Services 2,000 Interpretive Panel Marina Beach Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 640 575 500 310 00 Supplies 1,609 Gifts Catalog Fund 127 000 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 3,609 Packet Page 103 of 145 vii Hotel/Motel Tax 120 000 310 597 132 550 00 Interfund Transfer 5,000 Transfer to 132 for grant match Hotel/Motel Tax 120 000 310 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 5,000 Capital Projects 132 000 000 397 120 000 00 Interfund Transfer 5,000 Capital Projects 132 000 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 5,000 Parks Trust Fund 136 300 640 597 001 550 00 Interfund Transfer 25,403 2010 Pool Subsidy Parks Trust Fund 136 300 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,403 General Fund 001 000 000 397 136 000 00 Interfund Transfer 25,403 General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 25,403 LID Fund Control 211 000 320 597 213 550 00 Interfund Transfer 58,000 LID Receipts LID Fund Control 211 000 320 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 58,000 LID Guaranty Fund 213 000 000 397 211 000 00 Interfund Transfer 58,000 LID Guaranty Fund 213 000 320 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 58,000 REET 2 125 000 640 594 750 650 00 Construction Projects 200,000 125 Fund REET 2 125 000 640 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 200,000 Packet Page 104 of 145 Prepared By:Lorenzo Hines Department: GF Revenues Description on Budget Amendment Summary Reduction of Sales Tax Revenue Estimate Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) -$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Sales & Use Tax 001.000.000.313.100.000.00 1,000,000.00 Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease 1,000,000.00$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 (1,000,000.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) (1,000,000.00)$ Reduce Sales Tax forecast due to struggling economy. Page 1 Packet Page 105 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department: Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary Grant for Radar Purchases Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Small Equipment 001.000.410.521.710.350.00 984.41 001 General Small Equipment 001.000.410.521.710.350.01 984.41 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)1,968.82$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.334.030.500.00 (984.41) 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.334.030.500.00 (984.41) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,968.82)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The department purchased two radars for traffic enforcement in school zones. The department will be reimbursed for the cost of the radars from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission. Page 2 Packet Page 106 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department:Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary Slow Down or Pay Up July 2010 Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Overtime 001.000.410.521.710.120.00 2,644.77 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)2,644.77$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.333.020.601.00 (2,644.77) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (2,644.77)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The department is requesting a budget amendment for overtime expended during Slow Down or Pay Up speed enforcement grant. The April and July 2010, overtime expenditures are as follows $2,644.77. The overtime expenditures will be reimbursed by the WSTSC. Page 3 Packet Page 107 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department:Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary DUI and Target Zero Enforcement Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Overtime 001.000.410.521.710.120.00 2,124.93 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)2,124.93$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.333.020.601.00 (2,124.93) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (2,124.93)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The department is requesting a budget amendment for overtime expended during the X-52 DUI Target Zero enforcement grant. The Jul to Sep 2010, overtime expenditures are as follows $2,124.93. The overtime expenditures will be reimbursed by the WSTSC. Page 4 Packet Page 108 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department:Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary X-52 DUI Enforcement Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Overtime 001.000.410.521.710.120.00 1,756.84 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)1,756.84$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.333.020.601.00 (1,756.84) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,756.84)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The department is requesting a budget amendment for overtime expended during the X-52 DUI Target Zero enforcement grant. The Aug 12 to Sep 6, 2010, overtime expenditures are as follows $1,756.84. The overtime expenditures will be reimbursed by the WSTSC. Page 5 Packet Page 109 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department:Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary X-52 Speed Grant Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Overtime 001.000.410.521.710.120.00 478.12 001 General Overtime 001.000.410.521.710.120.00 986.53 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)1,464.65$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.333.020.601.00 (478.12) 001 General Grant Funding 001.000.000.333.020.601.00 (986.53) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,464.65)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The department is requesting a budget amendment for overtime expended during X-52 speed enforcement grant. The June and July 2010, overtime expenditures are as follows; June ($478.12), July ($986.53). The overtime expenditures have been reimbursed by the WSTSC. Page 6 Packet Page 110 of 145 Prepared By:Gerry Gannon Department:Police Department Description on Budget Amendment Summary Byrne Grant Funding Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Small Equipment 001.000.410.521.100.350.00 4,209.31 001 General Fund Small Equipment 001.000.410.521.220.350.00 8,435.76 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)12,645.07$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Grant Fund 001.000.000.331.160.580.00 (4,209.31) 001 General Grant Fund 001.000.000.331.160.580.00 (8,435.76) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (12,645.07)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ This is grant funding from the 2009 Recovery Act Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program Local Solicitation. As part of the grant program the department purchased 16 printers to be used with the collision/ticket writing software ($4209.31). The department requested a change to the grant program due to technology changes and requested the pagers be removed from the original grant request. This request was granted by our program manager. In addition, the grant manager approved the department's request to purchase additional Tasers from the grant funds. The department purchased 9 additional Tasers and associated equipment ($8,435.76). Page 7 Packet Page 111 of 145 Prepared By:Deb Sharp for Scott Snyder Department: City Attorney Description on Budget Amendment Summary Unbudgeted Attorney Costs Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Professional Services 001.000.360.515.100.410.00 144,250.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 144,250.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 (144,250.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) (144,250.00)$ Please see the attached memo (City Attorney 1-3) from the City Attorney. Page 8 Packet Page 112 of 145 A Member of the International Lawyers Network with independent member law firms worldwide 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98101-1686 206.447.7000 Fax: 206.447.0215 Web: www.omwlaw.com {WSS833300.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } MEMORANDUM DATE: November 4, 2010 TO: Council Finance Committee City of Edmonds FROM: W. Scott Snyder, Office of the City Attorney RE: City Attorney Budget -- Unbudgeted Costs The purpose of this memo is to provide year to date estimates regarding legal matters which were unbudgeted in 2010. As the Council is aware, while the general City Attorney budget provides for claim review, a certain amount of nuisance lawsuits and one or two Land Use Petition Act reviews annually, your legal budget does not include a contingency for larger litigation matters. During the course of the year, I report to the City Council and receive your approval for these defense or other legal expenditures. This memo reviews matters which were not budgeted but which require appropriations or transfers. These matters have been reviewed by the City Council in executive session or, as in the case of the TBD, involve a separately funded entity. TBD As you are aware, the TBD is a separate entity. While I bill the City for services to the TBD, the legal charges, which by year end will total approximately $6,000 should be transferred to the City Attorney budget from TBD revenue or billed to the TBD by the City. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS The Council did not budget for labor negotiations in 2010, and the current budget does not appear to provide for labor costs for 2011. As you may remember, my estimates, provided to the City Council in executive session, were for negotiation costs for 2010 of $35,000 to $50,000 depending upon the approach which the City Council wished to utilize in negotiation. Because the City Council has authorized a roll-over contract approach for 2010, costs for this year are estimated to run approximately $10,000 to $10,500 for the three units. That estimate breaks down to approximately $3,750 for Teamsters, $2,000 for Police, $3,500 for SEIU and $1,000 for Police Support and general City Council discussions. City Attorney 1 Packet Page 113 of 145 Council Finance Committee November 4, 2010 Page 2 {WSS833300.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } If these contracts are rolled over, the City Council should anticipate budgeting the $35,000 to $50,000 costs for full negotiations in 2011. LITIGATION The following matters have been discussed with Council in executive session and specific strategies approved: 1. Locke v. Edmonds. In accordance with City Council direction, the claims against Mr. Locke have been dismissed and staff and I are attempting to work out an “on the ground” solution to his driveway/drainage problems. Year end costs are estimated to be $5,000 total. 2. Meiers v. Edmonds. This slope failure case has been noted for trial. Costs to year end are estimated to $8,000. This matter is being defended in conjunction with WCIA-appointed counsel, Mark Bucklin. The City incurs legal costs because certain of the claims are not covered. 3. Breske -- Claims and Licensing Complaint. 3.1 Claims and Litigation. Approximately $14,000 has been incurred year to date on this appeal to the Court of Appeals following a LUPA decision in the City’s favor. Year end costs in this category are estimated to $18,000. 3.2 Licensing Complaint. In addition, the Breskes filed licensing complaints against current and former City employees. The City Council authorized the employees’ defense under the City’s indemnity ordinance. Costs to date are approximately $9,500 with an additional $500 estimated to year end for a total of $10,000. 4. LUPA Actions. Two LUPA matters are currently before the Snohomish County Superior Court. Hathaway v. Edmonds relates to a code enforcement action regarding steep slope tree removal. Costs year end are estimated to be $19,000. Drake v. Edmonds is a straight forward neighbor appeal of an accessory dwelling unit approval. Year end costs are estimated to be $9,000. This level of LUPA defense is a normally incurred cost within your budget and is noted here only for your information. 5. Construction Claims. TE Briggs’ claims have been discussed extensively with City Council in executive session. Costs year to date are approximately $16,000 and the City Council has approved $10,000 in costs for mediation. The attorney costs to year end are estimated to be $26,000. The 175th Walkway claim has incurred legal costs year to date of approximately $11,000 with $3,000 estimated to year end, for a total of $14,000. These totals yield unbudgeted litigation costs at $40,000 for construction claims. City Attorney 2 Packet Page 114 of 145 Council Finance Committee November 4, 2010 Page 3 {WSS833300.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 6. Sweet Pea Tree. The Council authorized investigation, tree appraisal and initial litigation costs in this matter. Approximately $3,400 has been expended through October 31. The City Council is evaluating how and whether to pursue this claim. Year end costs are estimated to be $3,400 plus any additional costs approved by City Council. 7. Reidy / Thuesen. These matters have been discussed extensively in executive session with City Council approval of a litigation strategy involving outside counsel attempting to mediate the claims of the two parties. As you will remember, a claim and lawsuit was filed by Mr. Reidy as well as a claim and lawsuit by Mr. Thuesen against the City. In addition, code enforcement actions and monitoring of the Thuesen development application has resulted in legal costs. The claims and litigation by Mr. Reidy involve year to date costs of $2,064. The Thuesen development review and code enforcement action regarding Mr. Reidy arising out of the Thuesen development application total $19,900. As the City Council is aware, these costs were incurred in the first quarter of the year. Given estimated costs of approximately $75,000 to litigate the various lawsuits, the City Council authorized retention of Grant Weed as conflict counsel to attempt to craft a settlement agreement and solution between the Reidys and Thuesens. Mr. Weed was successful. His costs of $40,564 and costs of a waste container to remove construction debris ($1,405) bring the estimated total to year end, including $2,000 for continued monitoring of the settlement to $65,000. 8. Karlsten. This flooding claim has been reviewed on several occasions with the City Council in executive session. Pursuant to approved legal strategy, $4,517.30 has been incurred year to date and $6,000 is estimated for year end costs. While your legal budget will cover some of these costs, Council approval of unbudgeted costs include: 1. TBD: $ 6,000 2. Labor: $ 10,250 3. Litigation: $128,000 [does not include LUPA defense costs for Hathaway and Drake]. for a total of unbudgeted litigation and labor negotiation costs of approximately $144,250. WSS/gjz City Attorney 3 Packet Page 115 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department:Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary Aquatics salaries Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Salaries 001.000.640.575.510.110.00 (15,000.00) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)(15,000.00)$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Ending Cash 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 15,000.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)15,000.00$ In 2009 the schedule for Yost Pool was revised for cost savings. The change in hours of operation and a 92- day season resulted in a salary savings of $15,000. The savings were made to the 2009 budget and this carries the savings into the 2010 budget. Page 9 Packet Page 116 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department:Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary Senior Adventurers Field Trip Fees Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Travel 001.000.640.575.530.430.00 457.15 001 General Fund Miscellaneous 001.000.640.575.530.490.00 602.85 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)1,060.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Program Fees 001.000.000.347.600.000.00 (1,060.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,060.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The Senior Adventurers (Edmonds Day Camp 5th and 6th grade group) were charged a trip fee, which was included in their registration fee. Day Camp is over and we need to move the revenue into the correct expenditure lines (transportation, 43 and entrance fees, 49) to pay for the trips. Page 10 Packet Page 117 of 145 Prepared By:Deb Sharp Department: Multiple Departments Description on Budget Amendment Summary Merchant Bankcard Fees Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Miscellaneous 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 50,000.00 001 General Fund Miscellaneous 001.000.410.521.110.490.00 150.00 001 General Fund Miscellaneous 001.000.230.512.500.490.00 14,500.00 411 Utility Fund Miscellaneous 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 8,100.00 411 Utility Fund Miscellaneous 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 12,200.00 411 Utility Fund Miscellaneous 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 16,500.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 101,450.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Ending Cash 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 (64,650.00) 411 Utility Fund Ending Cash 411.000.654.508.000.000.00 (36,800.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) (101,450.00)$ In past years, the merchant bankcard fees have been included in the City's bank analysis calculation. The analysis calculation takes into consideration the City's earning credit (interest) and all the fees associated with our bank account. The analysis calculation includes fees such as NSF fees, deposits, positive pay items, ACH credits, transit items, just to name a few. Also included are Merchant Bankcard Fees which are the fees the City is charged each time we accept a credit card as payment. Since the earnings credit is so low and the City is taking more and more credit cards, the City is recognizing a negative interest earnings amount. In order to address this, we reviewed and reversed all the merchant bankcard fees for FY 2010 as of September. We will then expense the fees to the appropriate department. For example, any recreation charges will be charged against parks, utility payments against the utility fund and court charges to the court. One department not listed below is Development Services, they have enough expenditure excess authority (due to the director vacancy) to absorb the additional expense of approximately $6000. Page 11 Packet Page 118 of 145 Prepared By:Deb Sharp Department: Utility Fund Description on Budget Amendment Summary Transfers from Operations to Capital Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 411 Utility Fund Interfund Transfer 411.000.654.597.412.550.00 800,000.00 411 Utility Fund Interfund Transfer 411.000.652.597.412.550.00 200,000.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 1,000,000.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 412 Utility Construction Interfund Transfer 412.100.000.397.411.000.00 (800,000.00) 412 Utility Construction Interfund Transfer 412.200.000.397.411.000.00 (200,000.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,000,000.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 411 Utility Fund 411.000.654.508.000.000.00 (1,000,000.00) 412 Utility Construction 412.100.630.508.000.000.00 800,000.00 412 Utility Construction 412.200.630.508.000.000.00 200,000.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) -$ All revenue receipts for the utility funds are receipted into the 411 utility operations fund. An interfund transfer appropriation is needed to move excess funds from the utility operations fund (411) to the utility construction fund (412). In the last budget amendment there was $100,000 transfer for both the storm utility and the water utility for a total of $200,000. When requesting that amount I had preliminary numbers for the year and did not want to transfer a large amount until I had the 2010 estimate and 2011 budget numbers from the 411 storm utility manager and the 411 water manager. During the budget process it was determined based on the dollars remaining in the two utilities that the below amounts could be transferred from the 411 fund to the 412 fund. These dollar amounts are included in the 2010 year-end estimate columns for both funds in your budget books. Page 12 Packet Page 119 of 145 Prepared By:Deb Sharp Department: Street Construction Fund Description on Budget Amendment Summary Decrease Construction Project Costs Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 112 Street Construction Construction Projects 112.200.630.595.330.650.00 (350,000.00) Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)(350,000.00)$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 112 Street Construction Ending Cash 112.200.630.508.000.000.0 350,000.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)350,000.00$ The ending fund balance for this fund is negative due to the previous adjustment amending the beginning fund balance to the actual 2010 beginning cash and investment amount. Per the department's year-end estimate, construction project costs in this fund are substantially less than the budgeted amount. This entry is submitted to bring the fund into balance. Page 13 Packet Page 120 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary Youth Scholarships - Increase Awards Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 122 Youth Scholarship Miscellaneous 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 907.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)907.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 122 Youth Scholarship Ending Cash 122.000.640.508.000.000.00 (907.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(907.00)$ We are seeing an increase in scholarship requests due to the economy and would like to increase our awards to $4,307. Page 14 Packet Page 121 of 145 Budget Activity Form Prepared By:Frances Chapin Department: Parks, Rec, Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary Adjustment for grant Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 123 Tourism Promotion Arts Advertising 123.000.640.573.100.440.00 1,885.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 1,885.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 123 Tourism Promotion Arts Snohomish County 123.000.000.337.070.000.00 (1,885.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (1,885.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) -$ The Edmonds Arts Commission received a lodging tax grant from Snohomish County in the amount of $1885 for national advertising of the Write on the Sound writers' conference (WOTS). This amount was expended under advertising. Page 15Packet Page 122 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department:Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary 127 Fund Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 127 Gifts Catalog Fund Supplies 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 4,800.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)4,800.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 127 Gifts Catalog Fund Contributions 127.000.000.367.000.000.00 (23,920.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (23,920.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 127.000.640.508.000.000.00 19,120.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)19,120.00$ With the opening of Hickman Park and the construction of Haines Wharf Park, benches became available for gifting. Increase in revenue due to bench sales and increase in budgeted expenditures for plaques for benches. Page 16 Packet Page 123 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department:Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary Interpretive Panel Marina Beach Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 127 Gifts Catalog Professional Services 127.000.640.575.500.410.00 2,000.00 127 Gifts Catalog Supplies 127.000.640.575.500.310.00 1,609.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)3,609.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 127 Gifts Catalog Ending Cash 127.000.640.508.000.000.00 (3,609.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(3,609.00)$ In 2009, we received $4,000 from the Snohomish County-Camano Association of Realtors for an interpretive panel (scenic identifier) at Marina Beach. In 2010 we contracted with an artist to design the panel and had the panel manufactured. Page 17 Packet Page 124 of 145 Prepared By:Stephen Clifton Department: Economic Development Description on Budget Amendment Summary Transfer to 132 for grant match Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Interfund Transfer 120.000.310.597.132.550.00 5,000.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decreases)5,000.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 132 Capital Projects Interfund Transfer 132.000.000.397.120.000.00 (5,000.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (5,000.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 120 Hotel/Motel Tax 120.000.310.508.000.000.00 (5,000.00) 132 Capital Projects 132.000.640.508.000.000.00 5,000.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$ The Economic Development Department allocated $5,000 in 2010 as a match for the Preserve America grant awarded in September 2010. This funding is part of the monies budgeted from the 120 fund for use by the Economic Development Department. The transfer is from the 120 to the 132 fund for the Preserve America grant matching expenditures. Page 18 Packet Page 125 of 145 Prepared By:Renee McRae Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary 2010 Pool Subsidy Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 136 Parks Trust Fund Interfund Transfers 136.300.640.597.001.550.00 25,403.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 25,403.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 001 General Fund Interfund Transfers 001.000.000.397.136.000.00 (25,403.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (25,403.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 136 Parks Trust Fund 136.300.640.508.000.000.00 (25,403.00) 001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 25,403.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) -$ In 2009, the Save Yost Pool group raised monies to keep Yost Pool open for the season. There is still a balance in the fund to cover the subsidy for the 2010 season. Revenues and expenditures are now compiled and the subsidy is the overage of the expenses for the season. Page 19 Packet Page 126 of 145 Prepared By:Deb Sharp Department: Debt Service Fund Description on Budget Amendment Summary LID Receipts Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 211 LID Fund Control Interfund Transfer 211.000.320.597.213.550.00 58,000.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease) 58,000.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount 213 LID Guaranty Fund Interfund Transfer 213.000.000.397.211.000.00 (58,000.00) Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (58,000.00)$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 211 LID Fund Control 211.000.320.508.000.000.00 (58,000.00) 213 LID Guaranty Fund 213.000.320.508.000.000.00 58,000.00 Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) -$ The LID bonds were paid off in 2009. The receipts received from LID customers is receipted into the LID Fund. Per our bond council, the funds are the City's and should be transferred into the LID Guaranty Fund for future debt payments. Due to paying off the bonds in 2009, we exceeded our expenditure authority last year. The auditor told us since it was a biennial budget, we could increase our expenditure authority in 2010 to cover last year. Page 20 Packet Page 127 of 145 Prepared By:Brian McIntosh Department:Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Description on Budget Amendment Summary 125 Fund Budget Amendment Detailed Description Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fund #Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount 125 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 Construction Projects 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 200,000.00 Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)200,000.00$ Revenue (Increase) Decrease Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$ Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease) Fund Fund Title Ending Fund Balance BARS Number Amount 125 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 125.000.640.508.000.000.00 (200,000.00) Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(200,000.00)$ Funding to complete 2010 construction projects (primarily Haines Wharf Park) and final engineering for 2011 construction projects (primarily Interurban Trail). Page 21 Packet Page 128 of 145 AM-3545   Item #: 7. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:10 Minutes   Submitted For:Councilwoman Petso Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Type:Information  Information Subject Title Discussion regarding pay off of City Hall bonds. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Councilmember Petso and the Mayor met privately and discussed this item. The Mayor expressed no opposition to the proposal.  Previous Council Action The Finance Committee reviewed this item at the October 12, 2010 meeting. Attachment 1:  October 12, 2010 Finance Committee Meeting Minutes Narrative At present, expenditures from the 126 fund (REET) exceed expected revenues, and the 126 fund is expected to shortly require a subsidy from the general fund. That situation can be reversed by paying off the Debt Service on City Hall, which represents an expense of over $400,000 per year. Note: The 126 fund is the REET fund with the greatest flexibility in uses of REET revenue. For example, the 126 fund can be used for park acquisitions, while the 125 fund cannot.  According to the answers to budget questions of 10/26, attached, the bond may be currently paid off using 2010 budgeted money from the 126 fund ($417,264), plus the $1,300,000 million in the public safety reserve fund, plus approximately 19,000 from 126 ending cash.  The proposal would restore the 126 fund to solvency, save over $100,000 in future interest cost, and meet the council’s desire to spend the one-time revenue from the sale of the fire department on a one-time expense. Attachment 2:  Fund 126 Projections presented by former Parks & Recs Director Brian Mcintosh at the October 12, 2010 Finance Committee Meeting Attachment 3:  Answers to budget questions of October 26, 2010 regarding City Hall debt service. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: Packet Page 129 of 145 Revenue: Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: The proposal would cost in excess of 1.7 million with just over $400,000 already allocated for 2010 toward this purpose.  The remaining cost would be covered almost entirely by FD #1 proceeds. Attachments Attach 1 - Oct 12 2010 Finance Committee Min Attach 2 - REET Debt Schedule Attach 3 - Petso budget questions Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/18/2010 01:25 PM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:56 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 11/16/2010 10:39 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 130 of 145 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 12, 2010 5:57 PM V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\FINANCE COMMITTEE 2010\10-12-10 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES.DOCX Present: Councilmember Bernheim Councilmember Buckshnis Councilmember Fraley-Monillas Councilmember Petso Staff: Al Compaan, Chief of Police Brian McIntosh, Director, Parks and Recreation Lorenzo Hines Jr., Director, Finance and Information Services Debi Humann, Human Resources Director Sandy Chase, City Clerk Public: Jan Vance, Executive Director, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Ron Clyborne, 1st Vice President, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Don Hall Bruce Witenberg Ron Wambolt Roger Hertrich Councilmember Buckshnis called the meeting to order at 5:57 PM. A. Discussion of Mayor discretionary pay increases for vacant position Councilmember Petso presented her concerns with the current authority of the Administration in regards to this matter. Debi Humann discussed the history and the supporting ordinance (Ordinance 3680), which gives the Mayor this discretion. The committee will work with Ms. Humann and the city attorney to revise current law in this matter to make the authority more specific and limiting. B. Discussion and review of debt service in Funds 125 and 126 Councilmember Petso presented her suggestions for reducing the debt service associated with Fund 126. Her suggestions included paying off bonds earlier, moving debt to Fund 125, or refunding bonds to attain a lower interest rate. Mr. McIntosh provided the history of the debt currently paid by Fund 126. Mr. Hines indicated that the City has had discussion with the City’s bond council and that analysis would be forthcoming as requested by Councilmember Bernheim. The committee will present the item before full Council for discussion. C. Edmonds Chamber of Commerce request for funding Mr. Clyborne and Ms. Vance presented the $5,000 funding request to the committee. Mr. Clyborne indicated that this would be a one-time request; however, the Chamber would be open to an ongoing stipend from the City as well. Mr. Clyborne and Ms. Vance responded to questions from the Committee as well. The Committee will take the issue before full Council for discussion. Packet Page 131 of 145 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 126 Purpose 2010 Appropriation Principal balance attributed to Fund 126 at 12/31/2009 Original principal balance attributed to Fund 126 2001 BONDS, B - PRINCIPAL Marina Beach purchase 100,000$ 1,595,000$ 2,260,000$ 2001 BONDS, B - INTEREST Marina Beach purchase 82,668 2007 LTGO BOND - PRINCIPAL Francis Anderson Ctr. Seismic Project 15,990 367,770 407,940 2007 LTGO BOND - INTEREST Francis Anderson Ctr. Seismic Project 13,882 1998 REF BOND PRINCIPAL City Hall Acquisition and Development 345,591 1,665,455 3,099,290 1998 REF BOND INTEREST City Hall Acquisition and Development 71,673 2002 LTGO Issue REET Share of Edmonds Ctr for the Arts 70,792 950,232 Grand Total 700,596$ 3,628,225$ 6,717,462$ REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX DEBT SCHEDULES 8/5/2010 No Bond Debt Scheduled Packet Page 132 of 145 From: Cooper, Mike Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:59 AM To: Hines Jr., Lorenzo; Mcintosh, Brian Subject: FW: 125/126 finance committee item Can the two of you take a crack at these? Maybe with Scotts help. From: Petso, Lora Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:54 AM To: Cooper, Mike Cc: Plunkett, Michael Subject: 125/126 finance committee item Mike Can you have appropriate staff take this over now that there appears to be significant council interest? (finance, legal, whoever). 1) Transfer Anderson Center payment to 125. For this, Council would need confirmation that the switch is legal (or an explanation of why we can spend 125 money on the Meadowdale Clubhouse but not on the Anderson Center). Council would need to see how the switch effects the 125/126 funds and the 2011 budget. Council would need to know how to make the change -- is a motion sufficient? Council would need to know the Mayor/staff recommendation and why? • Will need to consult with Foster Pepper our bond attorney regarding the above questions. • Will need to look at restrictions of use for funds Brian McIntosh response to first part of Question #1) In talking with the City Attorney we understand from the RCW that recreational facilities are not a permitted use for REET 2 (City of Edmonds Fund 125). Recreational facilities are specifically listed as a permitted use for REET 1 (City of Edmonds Fund 126) which is from where payments are currently being paid. In regard to using REET 2/Fund 125 funds for Meadowdale Clubhouse improvements, the Clubhouse sits within a 1.3 acre park and the funds spent here have been and are for park amenities as listed in the Capital Improvement Project list - trail system, playground replacement, landscaping, parking/playground fencing. Certainly the improvements benefit the Clubhouse activities as the preschoolers and other facility users use the park amenities. This is the same way Anderson Center users take advantage of the park surrounding that community center. 2) Pay off City Hall bonds Packet Page 133 of 145 For this Council would need to know how much is needed, including any amount already budgeted in 2010 and any amount already in reserve for the bond. It would also be nice to know the interest rate on this bond. And, as above, council would need the effect on the funds, budget, how to make the change, and a recommendation from Mayor/staff on the idea. • Lorenzo Packet Page 134 of 145 AM-3546   Item #: 8. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:5 Minutes   Submitted For:Councilwoman Petso Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Type:Information  Information Subject Title Discussion regarding paying Anderson Center bond from Fund 125 (REET). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Councilmember Petso and the Mayor met privately and discussed this item. The Mayor expressed no opposition to the proposal. Previous Council Action The Finance Committee reviewed this item at the October 12, 2010 meeting.  (See Attachment 1 in agenda item #7 of this agenda.) Narrative Presently, the Anderson Center Debt Service is paid from the 126 fund. That fund has a greater flexibility in uses of REET revenue than the 125 fund. For example, the 126 fund can be used for park acquisitions, while the 125 fund cannot. As a result, when an expenditure is eligible to be paid by either fund, it is better policy to pay the expenditure from the 125 fund.  The expenditure is similar to our recent expenditures from the 125 fund for work on Yost Pool and the Meadowdale Clubhouse, and thus would appear to be a permitted use of fund 125 revenue.  (See Attachment 2 in agenda item #7 of this agenda.) Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: Revenue: Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: There is no cost to the City from this proposal. In fact, because expenditures in the 126 fund already exceed expected revenues for that fund, the proposal assists in avoiding the projected general fund subsidy of the 126 fund (See Attachment 1 in agenda item #8 of this agenda.)  Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/18/2010 01:25 PM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:56 PM Packet Page 135 of 145 Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:56 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 11/16/2010 10:42 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 136 of 145 AM-3550   Item #: 9. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:5 Minutes   Submitted For:Councilwoman Diane Buckshnis Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Committee:Type:Action Information Subject Title Discussion and recommendation to fund Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Foundation request for funding for 2010 4th of July festivities. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action In May 2010, the Council received a letter from the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Foundation requesting $5,000 to help defray the costs of the 4th of July celebration put on by the Chamber. On June 1, 2010, Mr. Ron Clyborne, 4th of July Committee Chairman and Vice President of the Chamber, spoke during the Community Service Announcements informing the public of the upcoming July 4th event and again asked the City to help by donating $5,000 for this event. This item was brought before the 9/14/2010 Finance Committee.  During that meeting, Committee members briefly discussed the request. The Committee proposed to invite the Chamber of Commerce to make a presentation to the Committee regarding the funding request. During the October 12, 2010 Finance Committee Meeting, the Chamber made a presentation to the Committee regarding this request. Attach 1:  Letter dated May 21, 2010 from Chamber. Attach 2:  June 1, 2010 Council Minutes. Attach 3:  Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Profit and Loss Statement Attach 4:  October 12, 2010 Finance Committee Minutes   Narrative On October 12, 2010 the Chamber of Commerce provided a profit and loss statement for their 2010 4th of July Festivities. The final loss figure was roughly $10,000. The Chamber has requested $5,000 from the City of Edmonds to help fund that deficit.  I would respectfully request that the Council fund $5,000 from the Council Contingency Fund to help defray the costs of the 2010 4th of July Festivities put on by the Chamber. As of 10/31/2010, the total fund balance in the Council Contingency Fund is $73,778.72. Attach 5:  G/L Trial Balance Report for the Council Contingency Fund as of 10/31/2010.  Packet Page 137 of 145 Attachments Attach 1 - May 2010 Chamber 4th of July Ltr Attach 2 - June 1 2010 Approved City Council Minutes Attach 3 - Costs of 4th of July 2010 Attach 4 - Oct 12 2010 Finance Com Min Attach 5 - Council Cont Fund Balance as of 10-31-10. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Sandy Chase 11/18/2010 01:25 PM Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 11/18/2010  Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 138 of 145 Packet Page 139 of 145 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2010 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES June 1, 2010 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Strom Peterson, Council President Pro Tem Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Steve Bernheim, Council President D. J. Wilson, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Graham Marmion, Student Representative STAFF PRESENT Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief Rob Chave, Planning Manager Leonard Yarberry, Building Official Debi Humann, Human Resources Director Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 25, 2010. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #119126 TO #119246 DATED MAY 27, 2010 FOR $511,626.90. D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM VERIZON (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND ERIN GRAAFSTRA ($6,994.26). 3. COMMUNITY SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT - GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE / 4TH OF JULY EVENTS. Ron Clyborne referred to a letter provided by the Chamber of Commerce regarding their request for funding from the City for the 4th of July events. He explained the Chamber’s mission was to organize a family oriented Independence Day in Edmonds to attract visitors and enhance the small town atmosphere. Packet Page 140 of 145 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 1, 2010 Page 2 The Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce has been organizing events since 1907 and recently formed the Edmonds Chamber Foundation, a 501(c)(3), to allow the public to make tax deductable donations. One of the most worthy events the Chamber organizes each year is the 4th of July parade and fireworks, daylong festivities that build memories for thousands. He cited last year’s Children’s Parade that had over 2,000 participants and 8,000 spectators who watched the 2-hour main parade. He anticipated increased participation and spectators this year due to Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace’s cancelling their 4th of July celebrations. Musical entertainment and a fireworks display complete the daylong event. Mr. Clyborne explained the cost of the entire event is substantial and in the past have been covered by sponsorships and donations by the business community and the public. Despite the challenge of raising the necessary funds every year, the Chamber believes this event is critical to the community feeling and civic pride woven into the fabric of Edmonds. He urged the public to consider a donation to the Edmonds Chamber Foundation to help sponsor the 4th of July events. Mr. Clyborne provided the schedule of 4th of July events: Fun Run 11:00 a.m. Children’s Parade 12:30 p.m. Main Parade 1:00 p.m. Evening Entertainment 7:30 p.m. Fireworks 10:00 p.m. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked where the public could make donations. Mr. Clyborne provided the Chamber’s phone number, 425-670-1496, and the Chamber’s website: EdmondsWA.com. Mayor Haakenson commented few people realize how much effort and money the Chamber puts into the 4th of July events. He expressed his thanks to Mr. Clyborne and the Chamber for hosting the events every year. He relayed his conversations with Executive Director Jan Vance who indicated the Chamber was on the verge of not having this event in the future. He urged the public to contribute if they wanted Edmonds’ 4th of July events to continue. Councilmember Buckshnis anticipated the ability for the public to make tax deductible donations to the Chamber Foundation would encourage donations. 4. MIKE DOUBLEDAY - WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION RECAP. Legislative Lobbyist Mike Doubleday referred to the Final 2010 State Legislative Report in the Council packet. He provided the following highlights of the 2010 State Legislative Session: • $250,000 was provided in the supplemental transportation budget for the Shell Valley Emergency Road Access project. He recognized Representatives Marko Liias and Judy Clibborn for their assistance with that funding. He recommended the City spend those funds by the end of the biennium, June 2011. • A local government fiscal flexibility bill was passed that will allow Edmonds to: o Levy a 0.1% public safety sales tax increase with voter approval; 1/3 of the funds must be used for criminal justice purposes, o Eliminates the non-supplant language for the existing 0.1% criminal justice sales tax, and o Permits the City to continue to collect the tax on brokered natural gas • The state revenue package through application of a sales tax on bottled water, candy and gum will provide more funds to cities. Estimates are this source will generate $28 million to cities and counties statewide. The tax on bottled water will sunset in three years; there is no sunset date on the sales tax on candy and gum. Packet Page 141 of 145 Packet Page 142 of 145 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES October 12, 2010 5:57 PM V:\WORDATA\FINANCE COMM MINUTES\FINANCE COMMITTEE 2010\10-12-10 FINANCE COMMITTEE MINUTES.DOCX Present: Councilmember Bernheim Councilmember Buckshnis Councilmember Fraley-Monillas Councilmember Petso Staff: Al Compaan, Chief of Police Brian McIntosh, Director, Parks and Recreation Lorenzo Hines Jr., Director, Finance and Information Services Debi Humann, Human Resources Director Sandy Chase, City Clerk Public: Jan Vance, Executive Director, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Ron Clyborne, 1st Vice President, Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Don Hall Bruce Witenberg Ron Wambolt Roger Hertrich Councilmember Buckshnis called the meeting to order at 5:57 PM. A. Discussion of Mayor discretionary pay increases for vacant position Councilmember Petso presented her concerns with the current authority of the Administration in regards to this matter. Debi Humann discussed the history and the supporting ordinance (Ordinance 3680), which gives the Mayor this discretion. The committee will work with Ms. Humann and the city attorney to revise current law in this matter to make the authority more specific and limiting. B. Discussion and review of debt service in Funds 125 and 126 Councilmember Petso presented her suggestions for reducing the debt service associated with Fund 126. Her suggestions included paying off bonds earlier, moving debt to Fund 125, or refunding bonds to attain a lower interest rate. Mr. McIntosh provided the history of the debt currently paid by Fund 126. Mr. Hines indicated that the City has had discussion with the City’s bond council and that analysis would be forthcoming as requested by Councilmember Bernheim. The committee will present the item before full Council for discussion. C. Edmonds Chamber of Commerce request for funding Mr. Clyborne and Ms. Vance presented the $5,000 funding request to the committee. Mr. Clyborne indicated that this would be a one-time request; however, the Chamber would be open to an ongoing stipend from the City as well. Mr. Clyborne and Ms. Vance responded to questions from the Committee as well. The Committee will take the issue before full Council for discussion. Packet Page 143 of 145 Pa c k e t Pa g e 14 4 of 14 5 AM-3553   Item #: 10. City Council Meeting Date: 11/30/2010 Time:90 Minutes   Submitted For:Council President Bernheim Submitted By:Sandy Chase Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Information Subject Title Presentation of written proposed budget amendments. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative Written proposed budget amendments will be presented by the City Council members. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Mayor Mike Cooper 11/18/2010 05:57 PM Final Approval Sandy Chase 11/19/2010 08:16 AM Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 11/18/2010 01:35 PM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2010  Packet Page 145 of 145