2012.10.16 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds
OCTOBER 16, 2012
6:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
1.(60 Minutes)Convene in executive session regarding labor negotiations per RCW 42.30.140(4)(b).
7:00 P.M. - RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION / FLAG SALUTE
2.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda
3.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B.AM-5188 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2012.
C.AM-5190 Approval of claim checks #134556 through #134692 dated October 4, 2012 for
$1,865,907.81 (replacement check #134618 $5,487.85), and claim checks #134693
through #134852 dated October 11, 2012 for $845,113.27 (replacement checks
#134693 $132.00, #134783 $25.00, #134828 $911.25 and #134829 $68.61). Approval
of payroll direct deposit & checks #51717 through #51735 for $451,069.13, benefit
checks #51736 through #51748 & wire payments of $193,350.01 for the period
September 16, 2012 through September 30, 2012.
D.AM-5189 August 2012 Monthly Financial Report.
E.AM-5179 Quarterly Public Works Project Report.
F.AM-5180 Report on final construction costs for North Talbot Drainage Improvement Project and
acceptance of project.
G.AM-5181 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement No. 1 with Perteet for overlay and raised
median on the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement project.
H.AM-5184 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement #4 with David Evans & Associates for
Packet Page 1 of 532
H.AM-5184 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement #4 with David Evans & Associates for
additional utility work on the Five Corners Roundabout.
I.AM-5182 Accept a stormwater pipe and associated appurtenances installed by a resident at
23005-108th Ave W. and an associated easement.
J.AM-5183 Stormwater Billing Exemption Reconsideration
K.AM-5197 Ordinance amending sections of ECC 5.05 relating to Potentially Dangerous Dog
definitions, declarations, and appeals.
L.AM-5187 Approval of an Ordinance establishing an Historic Preservation Gift Fund.
4.(5 Minutes)
AM-5143
Proclamation in honor of Friends of the Edmonds Library Week, October 21-27, 2012.
5.(30 Minutes)
AM-5196
Presentation of 2013 Proposed Budget
6.(45 Minutes)
AM-5195
Public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan Element update for 2013-2018 to the city's
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The proposal updates the city's
Capital Facilities Plan to include improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of
city infrastructure such as transportation, parks, and stormwater along with other public
faciilties necessary to implement the city's Comprehensive Plan.
7.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public
Hearings
8.(10 Minutes)
AM-5178
Final plat and PRD for Stonebridge Court at 7723 & 7807 220th St. SW (PLN20070020
and PLN20070021).
9.(10 Minutes)
AM-5186
Ordinance regarding step backs and design standards.
10.(5 Minutes)
AM-5191
Indefeasible Right of Use Agreement for Existing Fiber Connection.
11.(10 Minutes)
AM-5192
October 2012 Budget Amendment Ordinance.
12.(15 Minutes)
AM-5185
Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum Update.
13.(15 Minutes)
AM-5193
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of October 9, 2012.
14.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
15.(15 Minutes)Council Comments
16.(15 Minutes)Convene in executive session regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).
17.(5 Minutes)Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session
Packet Page 2 of 532
17.(5 Minutes)Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session
under Agenda Items 1 and 16.
ADJOURN
Packet Page 3 of 532
AM-5188 3. B.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2012.
Recommendation
Review and approve.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Attachments
10-02-12 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Dave Earling 10/11/2012 08:40 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 11:10 AM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 10/10/2012 02:57 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/11/2012
Packet Page 4 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
October 2, 2012
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Strom Peterson, Council President
Joan Bloom, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Lora Petso, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Frank Yamamoto, Councilmember*
(*participated by phone in Agenda Items 1 and 8)
ALSO PRESENT
Yaelle Kimmelman, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Rob Chave, Interim Development Services Dir.
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER RCW
42.30.140(4)(b).
At 6:15 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding
labor negotiations per RCW 42.30.140(4)(b). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last
approximately 45 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety
Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials
present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas,
Buckshnis, Peterson, Petso and Bloom. Councilmember Yamamoto participated by phone. Others
present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite and City Clerk Sandy
Chase. The executive session concluded at 7:54 p.m.
Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:02 p.m. and led the flag salute.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO ADD A 15-MINUTE EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL
LITIGATION AS AGENDA ITEM 16. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas requested Agenda Item C be removed from the Consent Agenda.
Packet Page 5 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 2
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 18, 2012.
D. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #134435 THROUGH #134555 DATED SEPTEMBER
27, 2012 FOR $291,678.16.
E. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM HILARY RENEE
SCHNELL (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED).
F. GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION.
G. LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT SERVICE EMPLOYEES' COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENT.
H. APPROVAL OF UPDATED REPRESENTED (UNION) JOB DESCRIPTIONS.
ITEM C: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2012.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained she requested this item be removed from the agenda to abstain
from the vote as she was not present at the meeting.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM C. MOTION CARRIED (5-0-1),
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING.
4. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF SNO-ISLE LIBRARIES 50TH YEAR CELEBRATION
Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October 15th as the Sno-Isle Libraries 50th Year Celebration
Day for the City of Edmonds and presented the proclamation to Lesly Kaplan, Edmonds Library
Manager. Ms. Kaplan invited the public to the library’s open house on October 15, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m. to
enjoy food, music and fun.
6. NATIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October as Community Planning Month and presented the
proclamation to Planning Board Vice Chair Val Stewart. Ms. Stewart commented it was an honor to be
part of the community planning process. She thanked the Council for acting on the Planning Board’s
recommendations and the citizens for engaging in the process.
5. NATIONAL ARTS & HUMANITIES MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Earling explained the City was notified today that Edmonds is one of 60 communities in the
United States under consideration for Prettiest Painted Places in America. The final decision will be made
in a few weeks.
Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October as National Arts and Humanities Month in
Edmonds and recognizing the impressive contributions of citizens and visitors in the many cultural
resources and opportunities in Edmonds. He presented the proclamation to the Edmonds Arts Festival
Foundation.
Packet Page 6 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 3
Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin thanked the members of arts organizations and the arts
community who were present in support of the proclamation. As the proclamation states, Edmonds is
home to many arts organizations; there are now 227 arts related businesses in Edmonds that employ 582
people. The Edmonds arts community draws significant numbers of non-resident patrons, playing a
crucial role in attracting tourists which in turn helps create businesses and support jobs in the Edmonds
community. These creative industries include performing arts, visual arts, film, design, publishing,
museums, and art schools. The intersection of arts and commerce is evident in many local events
including the summer market, the Arts Festival and Write on the Sound Writers Conference happening
this weekend. Last year’s conference attracted 45 visitor bed nights at the local hotel; this year 84% of the
participants are from outside of Edmonds and 11% are from outside Washington State. The conference
sold out a month ago.
Ms. Chapin commented that arts are accessible in Edmonds such as the free concerts in the park and on
the waterfront, festivals and public art. The arts are part of the business community and many businesses
are actively involved in the arts via sponsorships and other ways. The Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
formed the Chamber Arts and Culture Committee. The committee has developed a new program,
Chamber Arts Awards, that will celebrate the partnership of business and arts in Edmonds. The Chamber
Arts Awards acknowledge the value of arts in Edmonds, the role of business in supporting the arts and the
role of arts organizations in contributing to a healthy business community built with strong partnerships.
Ms. Chapin encouraged everyone to take time to celebrate the arts in October – go to a show, spend an
evening with the Washington State Poet Laureate, attend the last summer market of the season, check out
the new flower pole art outside Hazel Miller Plaza, or enjoy an autumn art walk.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: ACCEPTANCE OF A GIFT OF ARTWORK FROM THE EDMONDS ARTS
FESTIVAL FOUNDATION.
Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin explained the Edmonds Art Festival Foundation (EAFF) has
donated significant artworks and funding for major artworks to the City over the last 25 years. The EAFF
has proposed another donation to the City, the two glass artworks by Dale Chihuly and the custom cases
that house the two installations, currently on loan to the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) and located
in the balcony stairway.
Ms. Chapin described the process in the City’s gift policy for art donations; if the value of the artwork is
more than $5,000, a public hearing at City Council is required. She displayed photographs of the two
glass artworks valued at $77,000.
To the question regarding the cost to the City to insure the pieces, Ms. Chapin explained the City has a
$25,000 deductible. The City will be removing a number of art pieces from the insurance inventory whose
value is below $25,000. The $83/year cost to add the two glass artworks to the City’s insurance policy
will be offset by the artworks that will be removed from the insurance inventory.
Ms. Chapin summarized the intent of adding the Chihuly artworks to the City’s collection is to enhance
their visibility to the public; the pieces will be added to the City’s public art walk brochure and
information on the website. Staff recommends the Council accept the donation.
Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Darlene McLellan, Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation Board Member, explained the EAFF’s
donations of art and funding for major artworks to the City enhances the City’s reputation as an arts
community. This year the EAFF has proposed another donation, the two Chihuly glass artworks and
custom cases currently located at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The EAFF uses their expertise to
Packet Page 7 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 4
provide oversight of the care of the significant art pieces in the City’s collection. She described how the
EAFF purchased the Chihuly glass artworks. In the mid-1990s, the EAFF was presented with the
possibility of acquiring pieces of Dale Chihuly’s artwork. The artist wanted a new truck. Harris Ford was
not interested in the artwork but was happy to partner with an arts organization. The artwork was selected,
EAFF provided a check to Harris Ford and Dale Chihuly acquired his truck.
On April 29, 1995, the EAFF (then the EAF Museum) presented their new acquisitions to art patrons in
Edmonds. The artwork was exhibited at Frontier Bank until 2006 when the opportunity arose to loan the
pieces and the new display cases for exhibit in the Edmonds Center for the Arts. It is hoped the pieces
will remain on display at the ECA long term and that the City will retain the documentation of ownership.
Should an art museum be developed or changes made at ECA, the Arts Commission would be the
appropriate body to recommend a change in the display location.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON,
TO ACCEPT THE DONATION OF THE TWO ART PIECES.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented it was extremely generous of the EAFF to donate these artworks.
She recognized the numerous EAFF Board Members and volunteers in the audience. There will be an
Interlocal Agreement between the City and the ECA to allow the artworks to be displayed in the ECA.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING TAKING MINUTES/NOTES DURING CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Harry Gatjens, Edmonds, submitted written comments.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, commented in 1996, although not required by state law, the Council passed
Resolution 853 regarding taking executive session minutes because they found it to be in the public
interest. The City keeps minutes of executive sessions with the intent of making certain minutes available
to the public in the future. He cited statements from the former City Attorney in the June 5, 2007 minutes
that once the process was concluded, all executive session minutes would be available to the public and
from the July 17, 2007 minutes that the City kept minutes of executive session to satisfy the public at a
future date that the Council discussed the appropriate issue. On August 7, 2007, the City Council passed
Resolution 1150 related to additional rules of procedure to govern Council meetings minutes and stating
prior to adjournment of an executive session the Council shall, by consensus, determine what, if any,
information may be released regarding the executive session. Mr. Reidy relayed two questions related to
Resolution 1150, 1) does the Council follow its rules of procedure by determining what, if any,
information may be released regarding the executive session prior to adjournment of each executive
session, and 2) how does the Council determine consensus in executive session. He recommended the
Council rewrite its rules of procedure to require digital recordings of all executive sessions, similar to the
Port of Seattle’s practice. This would be helpful if the City needed to recall previous actions or prove its
conduct in executive session was proper and consistent with RCW 42.30.110. Recordings may mitigate
risks related to disputes over actions that took place in executive session. He also requested
Councilmembers state whether they have contacted the Port of Seattle to obtain feedback related to the
Port’s practice of recording executive sessions.
(Councilmember Yamamoto participated in this item by phone beginning at this point in the meeting.)
Packet Page 8 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 5
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, suggested the Council continue as they have until the legislature acts. This
practice has served the City well; there is no rush to change. The Council may want to review the notes
with regard to past and future decisions.
Councilmember Bloom read a letter from Don Hall, Edmonds, who was in favor of recording executive
sessions. He pointed out past Councils felt it important to keep a record and took the time to spell out how
and what could be released to the public. Recording will reinforce to citizens that the Council is following
the statutes. The City’s insurance carrier prefers no records as it reduces the possibility of lawsuits. Mr.
Hall felt maintaining a record would reduce lawsuits and not keeping a record may imply there are
improprieties taking place during executive session. The fact that other cities do not keep a written record
should be not be a reason for Edmonds not to maintain a record. The Council is responsible to the citizens
of Edmonds and not to the insurance carrier or other cities. Many Councilmembers ran on the idea of
providing more open government and not keeping a record of executive sessions is going in the opposite
direction. He did not believe any improprieties were occurring but pointed out the importance of
perception.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her response to Mr. Hall’s email, stating she ran on financial
transparency which is very different than open government. Because the Kirkland City Councilmember
who is also President of Coalition for Open Government has not introduced the concept to Kirkland and
Councilmember Bloom has yet to provide examples of any other city that records minutes, she was not in
favor of exposing the City to unnecessary risk. She agreed there were no improprieties going on in
executive session and suggested he not vote for elected officials that he did not trust as risk managers. Mr.
Hall responded to Councilmember Buckshnis’ email and indicated he found her comments interesting; he
hoped she did believe in open government and agreed with her suggestion regarding voting.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Council President Peterson recalled when the Council last discussed this matter, a motion was made to
rescind Resolution 853 but a decision was then made to hold a public hearing.
Motion #1
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO RESCIND RESOLUTION 853 THAT ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURE FOR
KEEPING AND RETAINING MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.
Amendment #1
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO CONTINUE TO RETAIN A RECORD OF
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS REGARDING LITIGATION MATTERS.
Councilmember Petso explained after reviewing the materials, she found there are good reasons to keep
records of executive session such as the ability to look at what was communicated at a prior meeting as
well as the ability to hold attorneys accountable for the advice they provide in executive session. The
reasons for not keeping records of executive session regarding litigation do not apply because they would
be attorney-client privileged or because they are an attorney work product. The record indicates those
minutes are highly likely to be protected from being revealed at an inappropriate time due to their
privileged status. If the Council chooses not to keep a record of executive sessions, she hoped to at least
retain records of litigation-related executive sessions because they would be protected.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented notes are currently kept of executive sessions regarding real
estate, personnel, and labor negotiations. Councilmember Petso’s amendment is to keep notes of only
executive sessions regarding attorney-client privilege. She asked whether Councilmember Petso’s intent
was for minutes or notes to be kept. Councilmember Petso answered whichever would get the most yes
Packet Page 9 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 6
votes on the amendment. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented minutes and notes are two very
different products; currently notes are kept; minutes require review and approval. Councilmember Petso
responded another option was a digital recording. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas clarified
Councilmember Petso had no preference regarding the type of record that was kept. Councilmember
Petso agreed she had no preference; whatever was easiest for Council and worked; she would be happy
with retaining a record of executive sessions regarding litigation.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested Councilmember Petso clarify that notes would be taken versus a
record.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the City Attorney to comment on issues related to keeping notes,
minutes or an audio recording of executive sessions regarding litigation. City Attorney Jeff Taraday
reviewed pros and cons related to keeping notes, minutes or audio recording of executive sessions
regarding litigation. An audio recording would provide the most complete record; if there is ever a
question about what happened during executive session, the audio recording would be the most likely way
of answering that question. If the goal is completeness of recording, audio or video recording would be
the best method. He explained a possible con although not from his perspective as he welcomed audio
recording, at least one lawyer he knew may not advise the Council with an audio recording on. Although
having an audio recording device on would not affect what he told the Council, it may affect what
Councilmembers tell him; he may not get the level of candor he needs from Councilmembers to provide
the best advice. With regard to notes, there is a completeness issue because as much as he values City
Clerk Sandy Chase’s note taking ability, there will be instances where things will be left out or be
inaccurate. With regard to minutes, he recommended against taking formal minutes of executive session
because he was unaware of a process the Council could use that would be in compliance with the Open
Public Meetings Act for approval and possible amendment of minutes as the Council cannot go into
executive session to discuss minute amendments. He summarized the choices are notes such as have been
taken or some form of recording, presuming the Council is in favor of the amendment to record attorney-
client privilege executive sessions.
Council President Peterson commented he would not support the amendment regardless of the form of the
record. One of the reasons the City Council holds executive sessions is to allow some candor and a free
flow of ideas. Citizens give Councilmembers their trust when they are elected; in a representative
democracy, Councilmembers represent citizens. Citizens have the last say when they elect
Councilmembers; if they feel the Council is abusing their authority, their vote will reflect that. If that trust
is broken such as happened with the Port of Seattle, remedies must be taken. He summarized that trust has
not been broken by the City Council and without taking notes, the Council will have better
communication among themselves, the administration and the City Attorney, which will allow the
Council to make better decisions for citizens.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas assumed there were reasons the Council supported Resolution 853 and
the idea of keeping minutes. She has served on numerous boards and commissions that have executive
boards and generally there is someone taking notes. She asked whether the City Attorney could take notes
so that they would be attorney-client privileged. Mr. Taraday answered although he would like to believe
the courts would recognize the attorney-client privilege, there is no guarantee that a court would in fact
recognize the City’s privilege and uphold the City’s refusal to release whatever record was maintained.
There are instances where the attorney-client privilege can be pierced by a court. His notes likely are not a
public record. If there is interest in recording executive sessions, it probably should not be the City
Attorney’s notes as the City may want to use the notes to sue their attorney one day. For example if the
City wanted to sue the City Attorney for malpractice, it would not be appropriate to rely on the attorney’s
notes. If there was interest in keeping notes for that purpose, there should be a third party note taker.
Packet Page 10 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 7
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the purpose of taking notes in executive session. Ms. Chase
responded they have been used to reflect on what occurred especially by someone who was not present or
to review the history of a topic that has been discussed in the past. Executive session notes have been
requested via public records requests; some have been released and some have not. The State Archivist
stated notes of executive sessions are a permanent record. After six years they can be transferred to the
State Archivist but they are a permanent record.
Councilmember Petso reiterated the minutes reflect several reasons for maintaining a record, 1) to resolve
a disagreement over what was said or what emerged from an executive session, 2) to hold attorneys
accountable for the advice they provide, and 3) to demonstrate that the executive session was for an
appropriate reason. None of the reasons relate to candor. She commented the Council does not suffer from
a lack of candor and likely will say whatever they are going to say regardless of whether a tape recorder is
running. The reason for maintaining a record is the value of that record and she supported maintaining a
record of executive sessions regarding potential litigation as it could be done without risk to the City.
Amendment #2
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO
AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION TO DESCRIBE THE METHODOLOGY
OF A RECORD AS NOTES.
Councilmember Bloom questioned why the Council was considering rescinding the resolution when the
minutes of the Council retreat state it was the consensus of the Council to clarify, revise, rewrite the
resolution. She felt strongly the Council had a duty to clarify, revise, rewrite the resolution based on the
original concern related to notes versus minutes. She preferred to maintain an audio or digital recording,
envisioning with audio recording Councilmembers may be more careful about what they say in executive
session. As a compromise, she would be agreeable to only recording executive sessions that are attorney-
client privilege until direction is provided by the legislature that all executive session audio recordings are
exempt from public disclosure.
Vote on Amendment #2
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT FAILED (3-
4), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, PETSO AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, YAMAMOTO, BLOOM AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PETERSON VOTING NO.
Amendment #3
COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO
AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION TO AUDIO RECORD ALL EXECUTIVE
SESSIONS THAT ARE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED.
Vote on Amendment #3
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT FAILED (2-
5), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PETERSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, JOHNSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND
YAMAMOTO VOTING NO.
Councilmember Petso clarified her motion was to maintain a record of executive sessions regarding
potential litigation; the nature of that record was not specified.
Mayor Earling expressed concern the motion did not give any direction regarding how a record would be
kept; that decision needs to be made and should be made tonight.
Council President Peterson observed the Council voted down keeping notes and keeping an audio
recording. The only other options are to take minutes or a video recording. He asked for clarification
regarding the method of the record that would be kept.
Packet Page 11 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 8
Councilmember Petso stated the method did not need to be decided tonight; the amendment was to keep a
record of executive session regarding litigation. She assumed it would have to be accomplished as
Councilmember Bloom suggested via revising the resolution.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested another option would be to have the City Attorney take notes
on executive sessions regarding litigation.
Amendment #4
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PETSO, THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY TAKE NOTES SPECIFICALLY ONLY ON
LITIGATION ISSUES.
Council President Peterson clarified the against advice from the City Attorney, Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas’ motion was to have the City Attorney take notes. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas responded
the only reason Mr. Taraday gave against the City Attorney taking notes was the potential for the City to
sue the City Attorney.
Vote on Amendment #4
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT FAILED (3-
4), COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BLOOM VOTING YES; AND
COUNCILMEMBERS YAMAMOTO, BUCKSHNIS, AND JOHNSON AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PETERSON VOTING NO.
Vote on Amendment #1
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3),
COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, PETSO, BLOOM AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING
YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS YAMAMOTO AND
JOHNSON VOTING NO.
Mayor Earling asked how the record would be kept. There was no response from Council. Mayor Earling
expressed concern the Council had spent 30 minutes making amendments only to return to the current
practice with no direction given.
Action on Motion #1
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON WITHDREW HIS MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF
THE SECOND.
Council President Peterson explained he withdrew his motion as the amendment completely changed the
original motion.
Motion #2
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PETSO, TO REVISE RESOLUTION 853 BY ADDING “THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT
A RECORD OF NOTES SPECIFICALLY FOR LITIGATION ARE KEPT.”
Mayor Earling asked Mr. Taraday to comment. Mr. Taraday explained the previous votes on amendments
are essentially nullified by the withdrawal of the underlying motion, so thus far the Council has taken no
action. If there is interest in revising Resolution 853, he recommended the Council direct him to draft a
resolution for Council consideration at a future meeting rather than revising Resolution 853 on the fly.
Action on Motion #2
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE
AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND.
Packet Page 12 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 9
Motion #3
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MODIFY RESOLUTION 853 TO SPECIFY THAT WE
WILL KEEP A RECORD IN THE FORM OF NOTES ON EXECUTIVE SESSIONS REGARDING
LITIGATION ONLY.
Vote on Motion #3
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS
PETSO, BLOOM, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PETERSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND YAMAMOTO VOTING
NO.
(Councilmember Yamamoto discontinued his participation by phone at this time.)
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, referred to Agenda Item 13, explaining that eliminating the step-back
requirement would increase the amount of usable space. Although that would enhance developers’ profits,
the City’s sales and property taxes would also increase. Removal of the step-back would allow the
creation of more needed apartments. The newly opened Compass Apartment complex on SR104
demonstrates the demand for apartments; all 89 units were leased in a few months. Construction
downtown has been at a standstill for the past 6½ years; 7 out of 10 Architectural Design Board meetings
have been canceled due to lack of items. The Council has some responsibility for the situation due to their
lack of timely action on the Planning Board’s recommendations regarding development agreement and
step-backs that were forwarded to the Council in August 2011. He urged the Council to endorse the
Planning Board’s recommendation to remove the step-back requirement in hopes it will rekindle
developers’ interest in Edmonds. He also requested the Council discuss development agreements.
Darlene Stern, Edmonds, advocated for the Council to vote for the placement of the Main Street
Underpass/Main Street Grade Separation project on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Including the
project on the CIP will allow for discussion of the conceptual idea and is not agreeing to implement the
project or approving a funding source. Including the project on the CIP would allow the Economic
Development Commission to discuss the pros and cons of the project. Not including the project makes
access to the waterfront vulnerable to closure. She urged the Council to approve including the Main Street
Underpass project in the CIP.
Ken Reidy, Edmonds, asked about the Council’s procedure for reading a citizen’s email during a public
hearing. He expressed concern that the questions he asked regarding Resolution 1150 were ignored and
not discussed during the public hearing. He reiterated his questions, 1) does the Council follow its rule of
procedure by determining what, if any, information may be released regarding the executive session prior
to adjourning the executive session, 2) how does the City Council determine consensus in executive
session when the Council cannot vote in executive session, and 3) have any elected officials discussed the
issue with the Port of Seattle who has been digitally recording executive sessions since 2007.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented the standard building height is 25 feet; a maximum of 30 feet
can only be achieved via a roof design. If the Council eliminated the requirement for step-backs, he
recommended the first floor be extra tall such as is required in BD1. He agreed the step-backs were severe
but had a place in a building that was over the height limit as can occur in some situations. Regarding the
Capital Improvement Plan, he requested chip seal be included as a project and a pool and fields at the
Woodway High School site be combined. With regard to the Main Street Underpass, he pointed out there
Packet Page 13 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 10
was not enough space for a ramp on the waterfront side. He preferred to relocate the ferry dock to Pt.
Edwards where loading would occur over the railroad tracks. He questioned why several projects had
been restored to the CIP including lights at Walnut, Main Street, and Casper & 9th and the Olympic
Avenue Walkway. He recommended the Council ask staff for an update on the design of the Sunset
Avenue project.
10. REPORT: EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS
Joe McIalwain, Executive Director, Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA), thanked Councilmember
Petso for her participation as the Council liaison to the Edmonds Public Facilities District. He thanked the
Council for accepting the gift of the Chihuly pieces and allowing them to remain on display at the ECA.
Mr. McIalwain provided highlights of ECA operations and programming:
• Employs more than 20 full and part-time personnel
• Draws 60,000 people for a variety of events
• 2012-2013 Season:
o Season kicks off Friday, October 5 with Dianne Reeves
o Highlights include Natalie McMaster, Cirque Ziva, Pilobolus, Ladysmith Black Mambazo
and Blind Boys of Alabama
o Increased activity and revenue from partners and rental clients
• Fundraising for operations continues to improve
o Annual Gala Dinner & Auction – most successful to date: $268,000
o Increasing revenue from individuals, foundations and businesses to support presentations and
education programs
• Operated “in the black” in 2011 and trending up in 2012
Mr. McIalwain described recent successes:
• Season co-sponsors and event sponsors totaling $152,000 in operating support
• ECA is presenting seven student matinees and one in-school residency program for the 2012-
2013 Season
• Lobby rentals have increased – wedding, reunions, and special events (Leadership Snohomish
County)
• Edmonds Community College Convocation was held in the ECA Theatre on September 17th
Mr. McIalwain reported on the status of long term debt:
• Sales tax revenues have not met original projections, therefore additional funds are needed to help
cover a portion of the PFD’s bond debt
• Contingent Loan Agreement provides a mechanism for the City to help the PFD meet debt
service payments with loans
• Current outstanding loan amount: $351,946 (includes $41,770 loaned to PFD in June 2012)
• Projected loan amount in December 2012: $207,000
• Total projected loan amount in December 2012: $248,770
o There may be some limited savings in 2012 after bonds are sold
• Strategies to help cover long-term debt:
o Refinancing 2002 bonds – net savings of an estimated $70,000 per year
o New public and/or private revenue streams
o Improved operating performance – net revenue to service existing debt and/or invest in
facility maintenance
o Impact of economic recovery – unknown
Mr. McIalwain explained he is active in the statewide PFD Association who is working with the
legislature to extend the PFD legislation by 15 years. Although that will not provide an immediate impact,
Packet Page 14 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 11
it provides leverage when the 2008 bond issue is refinanced. He is also working with the Snohomish
County Council on accessing unallocated Lodging Tax Funds as well as working on a naming rights
project for the theater.
Mr. McIalwain reported on the Strategic and Business Plan:
• Purpose: Develop a 3-5 year Strategic and Business Plan with measurable outcomes and an
annual cycle of evaluation
• Consulting Team: Berk Consulting and AdvisArts, Inc.
• Project Team consisting of two representatives each from PFD Board, ECA Board, and ECA staff
• •Timeline:
o •Data gathering, stakeholder engagement: May – August, 2012
o •Strategic Situation Assessment – completed 9/7/12
o •Board/Staff Retreat – held 9/11/12
o •Draft Plan submitted to project team – 10/11/12
o •Final Plan presented to Boards – January 2013
Mr. McIalwain provided highlights from Strategic Situation Assessment:
• Performing arts programs are perceived to be successful and of high quality, and have a positive
impact in the community
• Most important challenges for the PFD:
o The long-term viability of the facilities
o The sustainability of the organization financially
• A more detailed discussion of the assessment and the initial draft of the Strategic and Business
Plan will be provided to the City Council in January
Mr. McIalwain explained the retreat explored three scenarios:
• Continuation of current operations and programs in existing facilities
• Continuation of current operations and programs, renovate classrooms and/or gymnasium for
long-term rental and/or development of new programs
• Public-private partnership to redevelop facilities
Mr. McIalwain summarized:
• Operation is “in the black” and improving, ticket sales, rental revenues and fundraising are all
trending upward.
• Refinancing of 2002 bonds will help reduce debt expense. PFD/ECA/City are working together to
develop new revenue streams.
• Strategic and Business Plan is scheduled to be completed in January. A report will be given to
City Council at that time.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested the quarterly updates include financials. She asked if a loan of
$250,000 would be required for 2012. Mr. McIalwain responded it looks like significantly less than
$250,000 will be required; he and Finance Director Shawn Hunstock have discussed the City budgeting
for $200,000 - $250,000. Councilmember Buckshnis commended Mr. McIalwain, the ECA staff and
volunteers for all their hard work.
Councilmember Bloom asked for a summary of the programs at ECA. Mr. McIalwain answered the main
source of revenue/ programming is the ECA season; 24 shows that the ECA books and brings to the ECA
stage. The season is highlighted in the season brochure and on the ECA’s website. In addition, more than
100 dates/year in the theater are booked by other organizations, businesses and citizens. In addition there
are long term leases; a school that utilizes one classroom during the school year; Community Christian
Fellowship uses the facility every Sunday; and the gymnasium is used for SnoKing Youth Club as well as
Packet Page 15 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 12
by other clients for sports activities. The gymnasium is also utilized by many groups that use the theater.
The ECA brings artists into schools via an outreach and residency program. In two weeks Natalie
McMaster, who will perform on the ECA main stage, will also do a free performance at the Senior
Center. There are also discussions with Swedish Edmonds Hospital about bringing artists to their facility.
Councilmember Bloom asked whether efforts are being made to increase the use of the theater and
gymnasium. Mr. McIalwain answered yes. Councilmember Bloom asked whether there is any
documentation online regarding the Strategic Plan. Mr. McIalwain advised once the consultant provides
materials, information will be posted on the website and the final Plan will be posted on the website.
Councilmember Bloom commented although the presentations all look wonderful, they are not very
affordable for families noting ticket prices range from $30-$45. She asked if there has been any
exploration regarding use of the theater for movies or less expensive presentations that might attract a
younger population and be more suitable for families. Mr. McIalwain answered expanding that area is
discussed often. The delay in family programming is related to artist fees which make it difficult to charge
less and still cover expenses. Supplementing that will likely come from fundraising. With regard to
movies, the ECA does not currently own a projector and screen. A donor of those items would make that
possible at little expense to the ECA.
Councilmember Bloom asked whether fiber options would allow performances to be streamed so that
viewers at home could pay a lesser amount. Mr. McIalwain answered the ECA paid the City to pull fiber
to the ECA. More equipment needs to be purchased and installed to make streaming possible. He
continues to work with the City’s CIO Carl Nelson. Rick Steves and Europe through the Backdoor
utilized the fiber and their own equipment to stream their performance.
Councilmember Petso recognized the PFD and ECA Board Members and staff in the audience. She has
enjoyed working with ECA staff and she thanked Mr. McIalwain and staff for the way they tackle
challenges.
Councilmember Johnson commented she participated in the community survey and looked forward to the
survey results. She referred to the City’s efforts to have student representatives on its boards and
commissions and asked whether the stakeholders included younger members of the community. Mr.
McIalwain answered the focus groups included four students.
11. UPDATE FROM THE PLANNING BOARD
Valerie Stewart, Planning Board Vice Chair, provided a bimonthly briefing of the Planning Board’s
activities over the past two months. Planning Board meetings are held the second and fourth Wednesdays
at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. Agendas, public hearing notices and related documents are posted on
the City’s website. She encouraged citizens and appointed/elected officials to attend meetings and
participate in public hearings where appropriate.
Vice Chair Stewart reported in August the Planning Board continued their discussion on the draft
Westgate Plan and form based code facilitated by Jill Sterritt and Nancy Rottle, University of
Washington. A lengthy public involvement process occurred via an online survey, listening meetings and
design workshops. The team also participated in a series of workshop discussions with the Economic
Development Commission. Throughout the public process for the Westgate plan, citizens indicated they
were less concerned about height in the Westgate and more interested in increasing and improving public
space for all ages. The Planning Board requested examples from throughout the Puget Sound region to
illustrate the concepts identified in the draft Westgate plan. Examples of mixed use principals included
Mercer Island and Redmond; this information is available to the public via the City’s website.
Packet Page 16 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 13
At their September 12 meeting, the Planning Board held a public hearing on a proposed plan and formed
based code guiding future commercial and mixed use development in the Westgate commercial area.
Further deliberations on Westgate are scheduled for later this month. Considerable public input has been
obtained thus far and has been incorporated into the draft published by the UW team. To this point the
Westgate District Plan and form based code are contained in a single document. Before the Planning
Board’s October 24 meeting, staff will identify how the various elements of the current document will be
incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Plan and development code.
A form-based code focuses closely on the form factor or how buildings are arranged or constructed
throughout a site. The central idea is to have different choices for building types rather than limiting
development to any one building type or use. The Plan also talks about the relationship of buildings to
surrounding sidewalks, streets and other buildings. The goal of the Plan is to create a mixed use, walkable
and compact development that is economically viable, attractive and community friendly and improving
connectivity. The Economic Development Commission has also discussed the need for suitable housing
for young professionals and seniors which means smaller and more affordable units. The current draft
Plan for Westgate is designed to be responsive to market conditions so development could look quite
different than the concepts presented in the draft. However, all development would result in enhancement
of public spaces and landscaping.
The Planning Board has dedicated four of their last meetings to the Port of Edmonds proposed Master
Plan for Harbor Square and have attended individual site tours. The Port has requested the Master Plan be
adopted as part of the City’s overall growth and development goals for the downtown waterfront area and
Comprehensive Plan. Their proposal is not a rezone and is not a project-level proposal. However
incorporating the Harbor Square Master Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan via the amendment
process would lay the foundation for future rezone and/or development agreement for Harbor Square
property to support a mixed use, transit-oriented development.
At the Planning Board’s third meeting regarding the Harbor Square Master Plan, held on September 12,
the Port presented changes to the Plan to reflect comments and suggestions provided by the Planning
Board at previous meetings. The changes were intended to expand on the existing plan elements and have
been approved by the Port Commission. The Planning Board conducted a public hearing on the proposed
Harbor Square Master Plan at their September 26 meeting. All data and proceedings regarding the Harbor
Square Master Plan proposal are available on the City’s website and the Planning Board’s meetings
regarding the Master Plan were video-recorded and aired daily at 7:00 a.m. on Channel 21 (Verizon) and
39 (Frontier). The October 10 meeting will include two public hearings, one on the Odgers rezone and the
other on the Capital Improvement Plan/Capital Facilities Plan. The October 10 meeting will also include
further deliberations and approval of Findings and Recommendations on the Port of Edmonds Harbor
Square Master Plan.
The Planning Board welcomed new Board Member Ian Duncan in August and a Student Representative
will begin attending meetings on October 10. She thanked staff, the UW team and Port for their hard work
and patience throughout the many months of process on the Westgate Plan and the Harbor Square Master
Plan. She also thanked citizens who have taken the time to study the materials and commented.
12. PRESENTATION ON THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2013-2018) AND THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2013-2018).
City Engineer Rob English provided a comparison of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP):
CIP CFP
Mandate? None GMA
Reason? Budget GMA
Packet Page 17 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 14
Time Frame? 6 year 6 year
20 year
Must include Capital? Yes Yes
Must include Maintenance? Yes No
Mr. English provided a diagram showing components found only in the CIP and only in the CFP and
components found in both the CIP and CFP. The CIP contains 6-year maintenance projects with funding
sources as well as 6-year capital projects with funding sources; the CFP contains long range (20-year)
capital project needs as well as 6-year capital projects with funding sources.
The 2013-2018 CFP contains 3 project sections:
• General
o Parks, buildings & regional projects
• Transportation
o Safety/capacity & pedestrian/bicycle
• Stormwater
He highlighted projects added to the 2013-2018 CFP and CIP:
• Main Street Undercrossing
o Emergency access
o Grade separation between transportation modes
• SR99 & 212th intersection
o Add westbound and eastbound left turn lanes
o Improve intersection level of service.
Mr. English explained the 2013-2018 CIP provides:
• Supporting information for CFP
• Two project sections – General and Parks
• Organized by City’s financial fund numbers
• Preliminary estimates on 6-year expenditures and revenue
Mr. English provided a summary of fund numbers in the CIP and the department managing each fund:
Fund Description Department
112 Transportation Public Works
113 Multimodal Transportation Community Services
116 Buildings Maintenance Public Works
125 REET-2 Transportation Public Works
125 REET-2 Parks Improvement Parks & Recreation
126 Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation
129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation
132 Parks- Construction (Grant
Funding)
Parks & Recreation
412-100 Water Projects Public Works
412-200 Storm Projects Public Works
412-300 Sewer Projects Public Works
414 Wastewater Treatment Plant Public Works
Mr. English highlighted 112 Street Fund projects:
• Main Street – 5th Avenue to 6th Avenue (construction)
• 5th Avenue Overlay (2013
Packet Page 18 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 15
• Five Corners Roundabout (2013)
• Signal cabinet improvements (2013)
• SR99 Lighting phase 3 design (2013
• 228th Corridor Improvements, design, right-of-way acquisition (2013)
• 212th & 76th Avenue Improvements, environmental review, design (2013
He highlighted 412 Utility Fund projects:
• Water Utility Fund
o 3,800 feet of replaced watermains (constructions)
o 10,000 feet of watermain replacement (2013
o Overlay 2,000 linear feet of roadway affected by waterline replacement projects (complete)
• Sewer Utility Fund
o Rehabilitation of nine sewer lift stations
o 5,600 feet of sewer main replacement/rehabilitation (2013
o Sewer Comprehensive Plan update (2013)
o 1,000 feet of CIPP sewer mains (2013)
• Stormwater Utility Fund
o North Talbot Road drainage improvements (complete)
o Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek drainage improvement (construction)
o Edmonds Marsh Study (2013)
o 3,300 feet of new/replaced storm drain pipe for Edmonds Basin #3 SD improvements (2013)
o Vactor Waste Handling Facility upgrade (2013)
o Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction study (2013)
o 95th/93rd Avenue Storm LID Project (2013)
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite highlighted Park CIP projects:
• Completion of Interurban Trail
• Completion of Hazel Miller Plaza
• Groundbreaking of SR99 International District
• Progress on 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
• Beginning Dayton Street Plaza
Ms. Hite highlighted CFP projects:
• Added Public Market
• Development of Woodway High School Athletic Complex
Ms. Hite highlighted REET 125 funded projects:
• Additional repairs needed at Yost Pool ($50,000). Added another $120,000 next year for boiler.
• Moved City Park to 2013, combined playground replacement with spray pad to match grant: City
Park Spray and Play Revitalization
• Carryover: Edmonds Marsh Study
• Set aside for Woodway High School fields
• Replacement of Mathay Ballinger play equipment
• Park Impact Fee Study, PROS Plan update
o Per MRSC, Park Impact Fee Study and PROS Plan not eligible as REET expenditures
o PROS Plan update included as decision package in 2013 budget
Ms. Hite highlighted Park Construction Fund 132 projects, advising this fund does not have its own
revenue source; it receives funds from grants and transfers from REET 125:
• 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor planning
Packet Page 19 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 16
• Completion of Dayton Street Plaza
• City Park/RCO grant
• Senior Center Improvements: subject to CDBG (unsecured funding)
Mr. English reviewed the CFP/CIP schedule:
• September 12 – Public Works, Parks, & Planning Committee
• October 2 – City Council; Introduction
• October 10 – Planning Board
• October 16 – City Council Public Hearing
• December 2012 – Adopt CFP with Comprehensive Plan Update
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the Edmonds-Crossing/WSDOT/Multimodal facility is still
included, observing Phase 1 is construction of the vehicle underpass to the existing ferry terminal and
Phase 2 is moving the ferry; those projects seem contradictory. Community Services/Economic
Development Director Stephen Clifton answered they are not contradictory. The language in the CIP
should be multimodal terminal Project 1.a., the multimodal terminal at Pt. Edwards, which neither the
City nor Washington State Ferries has abandoned, and Project 1.b., a minimum build alternative.
Washington State Ferries does not include a reference to Edmonds Crossing in their 2009-2013 long
range plan. He pointed out that Edmonds Crossing expenditure dollars are $237 million; the ability to
secure that funding by 2030 will be very difficult. Including a minimum build alternative, Project 1.b., in
the CIP provides the ability to seek funding to study the feasibility. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested
revising the language.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the signal at Caspers & 9th was added back into the CIP/CFP. Mr.
English explained two projects were discussed at the December 20, 2012 Council meeting, the Five
Corners roundabout and the signal at Caspers & 9th. A motion was made by then-Councilmember Plunkett
and seconded by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas to pull the project from the CIP/CFP; the motion failed
2-5. The project therefore remained in the CIP/CFP.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why an aquatics center at Yost Pool was included. Ms. Hite answered
the aquatic center at Yost Pool is included in the CFP as a placeholder; no funds have been set aside. The
project has not changed from last year; it is still an aquatics center at Yost Pool in the preferred option the
public selected. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether that will be revised. Ms. Hite answered all the
Parks CIP/CFP projects, including the aquatics center, can be revised as part of the PROS Plan update.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed Willows Creek was combined with the Edmonds Marsh. She asked
whether there were efforts to obtain funding from WRIA 8. Ms. Hite answered that effort has been in
conjunction with People for Puget Sound who closed their doors effective September 30 and moved most
of their restoration projects to Earth Corp Conservation Program.
Councilmember Petso thanked Mr. English for adding priorities on transportation projects. She asked why
some priority transportation projects are included and others are not. For example a traffic light and road
widening at Meadowdale Beach Road and Olympic View Drive, priority 17, is included but priority 15
and 16 are not. Mr. English answered it is a combination of factors including how a project may score on
grant applications.
Councilmember Petso referred to project changes such as the addition of rain gardens to the Southwest
Edmonds Drainage Project. She asked why rain gardens were added when all the water infiltrates into the
ground and does not discharge into a stream or Puget Sound. Mr. English answered the soil conditions are
very good for infiltration; the locations of the rain gardens are being designed. Rain gardens are a method
of dispersing the stormwater and are a good demonstration project for the community.
Packet Page 20 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 17
Councilmember Petso asked about Storm Drain Project 15 that previously included a pipe from near the
Perrinville Post Office to Browns Bay. Public Works Director Phil Williams answered after extensive
discussions regarding the Perrinville Creek Basin and the appropriate sequencing of capital projects,
instead of a bypass pipe, there was a consensus to first conduct a study to determine the best hydrologic
solution for the basin. It could be that a series of infiltration projects may be more successful, have a
lower cost and have the same hydrologic impact as Project 15.
Councilmember Petso clarified Project 15 is now a study rather than a pipe. Mr. Williams answered the
replacement/rehabilitation of the culvert under Talbot Road and Project 15 have been deferred until a
complete hydrologic study on Perrinville Creek is completed.
Councilmember Johnson asked if the Perrinville Creek Study would include Lynnwood who contributes a
lot of runoff to the creek. Mr. Williams stated staff met with Lynnwood within the last month to discuss
partnering on the study. Lynnwood has already prepared their 2013 stormwater budget; therefore their
financial participation is unclear. Lynnwood is enthusiastic about the project and acknowledges much of
the drainage basin is theirs. They have good ideas regarding where infiltration could occur and will be
great partners in the project. Councilmember Johnson commented a study is a step in the right direction.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how it was decided to put the Main Street Undercrossing in the
CFP rather than other options such as the Main Street Overpass, Dayton Street Emergency access, cut and
cover, etc. Mr. Williams responded studying a variety of alternatives to solve an at-grade crossing
problem is not specific enough to generate much enthusiasm for grant funding. Available documents and
alternatives in the work already done on Edmonds Crossing were used to identify the most feasible
alternative in the short term. The intent was a minimum build alternative; the undercrossing at Main
Street seemed to offer the best possibility. The intent is to obtain funds to study alternatives.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented that was a subjective determination and asked why the cut
and cover option was not selected. Mr. Williams answered an undercrossing at Main for cars would be
less expensive than a cut and cover. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented a cut and cover would
solve the noise issue of train whistles. Mr. Williams commented there are better ways to solve that issue.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether an undercrossing at Main was the most likely to be
funded. Mr. Williams answered a project needed to be included in the CIP/CFP in order to seek funding
to do an analysis. It appeared the undercrossing could solve many of the problems at the lowest cost.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed further discussion by elected officials and public input is
needed. Mr. Williams agreed, pointing out some funds need to be acquired to do enough work to facilitate
a meaningful conversation.
If a $60 million undercrossing is constructed at Main Street, Councilmember Petso questioned how the
ferry would ever be relocated to Pt. Edwards. She questioned how the undercrossing could be repurposed
if the ferry moved. Constructing it was conceding the ferry was not going to move, yet study documents
state the ferry needs to move to accommodate increased capacity. Mr. Williams answered the
undercrossing would have value for vehicular access to the waterfront even if the ferry moved. The
Edmonds Crossing is not in the Washington State Ferry’s 2030 plan; meanwhile railroad traffic continues
to increase. The issue is whether to do something to improve the problem until enough money is
assembled to do Edmonds Crossing.
Councilmember Petso commented an emergency access would be much less expensive than a ferry
loading access. Mr. Williams agreed. Councilmember Petso asked whether the intent was an emergency
access or ferry loading access. Mr. Williams answered the proposed project would be both. As there is no
immediate plan to move the ferry, this project could solve many of the same problems at a far lower cost.
Packet Page 21 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 18
Councilmember Bloom noted the problem of the railroad tracks blocking the beach and emergency access
has existed for many years. She was concerned including this large project on the CFP commits the City
to addressing the emergency access issue via an underpass. She suggested an alternate project that would
address emergency access separate from ferry loading. Mr. Williams answered the CFP is a 20-year plan
and it is not unreasonable to take a visionary approach. Including the project in the CFP does not commit
the City to anything; the City is not seeking design and construction funds for an undercrossing but rather
funds for a conceptual analysis of viable alternatives. If the solution also addresses ferry loading, the City
is much more likely to acquire funding with WSDOT Ferries Division as a partner.
Councilmember Bloom questioned how the emergency access problem will be addressed in the short
term, envisioning there was a less expensive alternative to addressing emergency access. Mr. Williams
answered knowing that train traffic will increase, the problem will worsen in the future. He suggested it is
possible to continue to live with the problem now while trying to identify a visionary solution without
doing an interim solution.
Mayor Earling advised the next step is a public hearing at the Planning Board.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON,
TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 45 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (4-2),
COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
13. CONTINUED DISCUSSION REGARDING STEP-BACKS.
Interim Development Services Director Rob Chave commented when discussing step-backs, the real issue
is design. He pointed out there have been distinct periods in the history of downtown buildings:
• Prior to 1956 adoption of zoning code
• 1956 to 1981
• 1981 to 1997
• 1997 to 2005
• 2005 to Now
Height limits have also changed over time:
• First zoning code in 1956: 45 feet
• 1964: 35 feet
• 1981: 30 feet
o Pitched roof / modulated design / step-backs
• Codes since 1981 have addressed what happens in the 5 feet above 25 feet, but the 30-foot height
limit has remained unchanged
• 2005 - step-back required to increase building height from 25 to 30 feet
Mr. Chave displayed photographs of buildings constructed prior to 1956: historic forms that still exist,
some are on the Historic Register, buildings that are important factors in the feel and design of downtown.
He displayed photographs of buildings constructed 1956 to 1981 that he termed as the “simple box,”
unadorned with little architectural character. The solution when the height limit was lowered to 30 feet in
1981 was a pitched roof but still no design guidance. He displayed photographs of building constructed
1981 to 1997, commenting the buildings tended to be a box with a “hat” on top. Beginning in 1997 there
was a requirement for modulated buildings. He displayed photographs of buildings constructed 1997-
2005, explaining the result was different roof forms and some attempt to differentiate vertical forms with
a lot of repetitive elements.
He summarized:
• Buildings prior to 1956
o Pedestrian scale & orientation
o A richness of materials & architectural detail
Packet Page 22 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 19
o Vertical detailing
• 1956 to 1981
o Larger scale, very simple buildings
o Lacking in architectural detail
• 1981 to 1997
o Some improvement in architectural detail
o Pitched roofs as an add-on or afterthought
• 1997 to 2005
o More architectural elements included
o More attention to vertical elements
o “Busy” horizontal elements
Mr. Chave summarized the code today requires:
• Retail core / BD1:
o No step-backs
o Mandatory design standards
• Other BD zones
o Mandatory 15-foot step-backs
o Design objectives (not design standards)
Mr. Chave commented it was difficult to find examples of 15-foot step-backs. He provided photographic
examples of 15-foot step-backs in downtown Kirkland and Old Town Bellevue, noting they were on
much taller buildings. He displayed photographs of Chanterelle’s and the Edmonds Theater, commenting
step-backs do not complement traditional commercial building styles. Using Chanterelle’s as an example,
he pointed out step-backs would not allow traditional buildings to be built. He displayed photographs of
buildings that echo traditional building styles and new construction that often tries to duplicate traditional
building styles such as Mill Creek Town Center.
Mr. Chave relayed the Planning Board recommendation to eliminate the step-back requirement in the
downtown (BD) zones. Staff supports this recommendation and believes stronger design standards are
needed that will produce good building design, such as currently exist in the BD1 zone.
If a maximum building height of 30 feet is allowed, Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether an
overhang could be required on the first level. Mr. Chave responded the BD1 zone design standards
address an overhang. There is design guidance for the other zones.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the zoning map and asked how the location of BD2, 3, 4 and 5
zones was determined. Mr. Chave answered BD1 is the retail core, BD3 is an auto-oriented area, BD4
already has a fair amount of multi-family therefore mixed use and multi-family are allowed, and BD5
recognized the planning done for the 4th Avenue Corridor. Everything else was zoned BD2. Most of
downtown is zoned BD1 and BD2.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Mr. Clifton and Mr. Chave for meeting with her and providing
her the history. She expressed interest in similar design criteria throughout downtown in all the BD zones,
noting other tourist towns she has visited have the same design throughout. She agreed the intent was not
to change the height, only remove the step-back requirement. Mr. Chave commented there has been a
great deal of focus on height over the years but little focus on design.
Motion #1
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO ACCEPT THE PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO REMOVE THE STEP-
BACK REQUIREMENT OF 15 FEET FROM THE CODE.
Packet Page 23 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 20
For Councilmember Petso, Mr. Chave explained the Planning Board was essentially saying a 30-foot
building could be constructed without a step-back. Councilmember Petso recalled the step-back provision
allowed an increase in height from 25 feet to 30 feet. She observed the motion would allow a 30 foot
building rather than requiring a step-back to obtain a height of 30 feet. Mr. Chave answered yes, although
there is still the requirement for a 12-foot ground floor.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with removing the requirement for a step-back but wanted to
have design standards as part of the package, otherwise there would be no step-back and 30 foot boxes.
Mr. Chave stated there is general guidance in the Comprehensive Plan but no specific standards.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recommended removing the step-back requirement at the same time
design guidelines are adopted. Mr. Chave advised that would require referring it back to the Planning
Board.
Councilmember Bloom did not support the motion as she agreed design standards were needed in
conjunction with removing the requirement for a step-back.
Council President Peterson noted step-backs are a major component of design; in this case a horrible
component. He asked if requiring BD1 design standards throughout downtown would require Planning
Board review. Mr. Chave answered it would. Council President Peterson expressed support for the motion
and then directing the Planning Board to implement design standards throughout the downtown.
Councilmember Johnson asked when the Planning Board made this recommendation. Mr. Chave
answered over a year ago. Councilmember Johnson explained a key consideration by the Planning Board
at that time was that a 15-foot step-back after 25 feet on a building on a flat lot with a flat roof would not
produce any usable space. Mr. Chave added there are a large number of narrow lots downtown and a 15-
foot step-back would result in the loss of a lot of practical building space without achieving any benefit in
design. Councilmember Johnson explained that was especially true on a lot with two street frontages. She
recommended making a decision on step-backs separate from any additional work the Planning Board
does with regard to design standards as that decision is long overdue.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not object to removing the requirement for a step-back; the question
was whether to remove the step-back and risk the construction of box buildings until design standards are
developed. Mr. Chave suggested as an intermediary the Council could reduce the step-back to a more
reasonable amount such as 5 feet while the Planning Board considers specific design standards. He
anticipated it would take the Planning Board until early 2013 to consider design standards.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Council could implement BD1 design standards in addition to
removing the 15-foot step-back. Mr. Chave answered that was beyond the scope of what the Planning
Board considered.
Councilmember Petso suggested removing the step-back requirement with a maximum building height of
25 feet rather than 30 feet. She noted the agenda memo stated the Council would provide direction to staff
to prepare an ordinance. When the Council last discussed this, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas requested
it be discussed after development agreements and Councilmember Johnson asked that it be discussed after
incentive zoning, neither of which have been discussed by the Council. She asked whether reducing the
step-back to 5 feet rather than 15 feet was within the scope of what the Planning Board considered. Mr.
Chave answered yes; the Planning Board discussed reduced step-backs.
Amendment #1
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
AMEND THE MOTION TO REDUCE THE STEP-BACKS TO 5 FEET WHILE DESIGN
STANDARDS ARE REVIEWED.
Packet Page 24 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 21
Councilmember Bloom commented it has been suggested by some that the Council is losing the City
money because there are developers who would like to develop properties if not for the step-back
requirement. She asked if there were properties that would develop with a 5-foot step-back at 25 feet
versus a 15-foot step-back. Mr. Clifton was unsure with a 5-foot step-back but there were if the 15-foot
step-back were removed. He agreed there is a perception among developers that the Council is stalling.
Councilmember Bloom asked what kind of buildings could be constructed if the Council reduced the
step-back to 5 feet or eliminated the 15-foot step-back without design standards. Mr. Clifton agreed it
would be preferable to have BD1 design standards also apply to the BD2 – 5 zones. He also supported the
Planning Board’s recommendation to remove the 15-foot step-back requirement. Mr. Chave commented
the design review chapter states developers must abide by the Comprehensive Plan guidance in the
Downtown Waterfront Plan which includes design guidance. They are not as specific as design standards
that apply to BD1. At the time, the Council did not want specific design standards to apply to BD2 – 5
zones and were comfortable with the design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff’s intent would
be to apply the design guidance to the BD2 – 5 zones.
If the Council eliminated or reduced the step-back, Councilmember Bloom questioned how many
developers would proceed with projects before design standards could be adopted. Mr. Clifton answered
it was impossible to know how many developers would utilize the elimination of the 15-foot step-back in
their design. There is potential for one property owner to possibly move forward with a development
although no final plans have been submitted.
Council President Peterson said he will not support the amendment as a 5-foot step-back did not appear to
be a positive design element although it was better than a 15-foot step-back. He did not fear a 1979 design
because there are design guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Johnson recalled there was a 25-foot height limit in the BD zones and an additional 5 feet
if the ground floor facing the street frontage had a 15-foot ceiling height. Mr. Chave answered that was
required in BD1. There is a 12-foot ground floor requirement in BD2; that would still exist with or
without the step-back requirement.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas would not object to eliminating the 15-foot step-back if the motion was
clear that the Planning Board would immediately begin work on design standards for BD2 – 5. She was
not comfortable with a 5-foot step-back and waiting until the Planning Board could get to the design
standards. Mr. Chave responded if the Council indicates it is a priority, staff will inform the Planning
Board and schedule it on their agenda. He anticipated the Planning Board could begin well before year
end. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas preferred that direction be in the form of a motion.
Councilmember Johnson commented problems still exist with a 5-foot step-back.
If the amendment failed, Council President Peterson offered to make an amendment to make the
development of design standards a priority.
Vote on Amendment #1
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT FAILED (2-4), COUNCILMEMBERS
BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
Amendment #2
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR THE BD2, 3 AND 4 BE PUT ON THE PLANNING BOARD’S SCHEDULE AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE AS A PRIORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Packet Page 25 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 22
Council President Peterson explained he did not include BD5 as that is the Arts Corridor where there are
primarily single family homes and it is a separate issue.
Councilmember Petso asked why design standards for BD5 were not a priority. Mr. Chave agreed design
standards for BD5 are on a separate track. The 4th Avenue Corridor Plan includes language regarding
historic preservation. Councilmember Petso asked if a 30-foot mixed use box could be constructed in the
BD5 if the step-back is eliminated. Mr. Chave commented the BD5 zone has some unique characteristics.
Councilmember Bloom did not support the motion because she preferred to have design standards in
place before making this change. There are many buildings that people are not happy with because 3
stories rather than 2 can be achieved on a slope and 3 stories are more likely to be achieved with a 25 plus
5 foot height limit with some modulation. She was concerned with massing and design and the possibility
that someone could slip in and construct a 30-foot box without appropriate design standards.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what would prevent someone from building a box before design
standards were adopted. Mr. Chave stated there are design guidelines in the form of design objectives in
the Downtown Waterfront section of the Comprehensive Plan that apply throughout downtown. They are
not as specific as the BD1 design standards. Under the design objectives, he was certain there would not
be buildings like those constructed 1956-1981 or 1981-1997; he could not rule out a building that was
similar to buildings constructed 1997 and later. The design guidelines adopted in 2004-2005 address
vertical detail; any building construction now would look much different than those constructed in the late
1990s.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, MOVED TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 15 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Petso referred to Anderson v. Issaquah and the ability to enforce design guidelines. City
Attorney Jeff Taraday answered he had not had an opportunity to study the City’s current design
guidelines and the extent to which they are enforceable under Anderson v. Issaquah. From what Mr.
Chave said, the guidelines are not as enforceable as staff would like and to some extent the City may be
relying on a cooperative developer to provide what the City wants.
Councilmember Petso asked whether it made a difference whether the design guidelines were in the code
versus the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Taraday answered yes. Councilmember Petso asked whether their
being in the Comprehensive Plan made them less enforceable. Mr. Chave answered the code points to the
objectives in the Comprehensive Plan as criteria for approval.
Vote on Amendment #2
THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING
NO.
Mayor Earling clarified the main motion was to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance.
Vote on Motion #1 as amended:
THE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION CARRIED (4-2) COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO AND
BLOOM VOTING NO.
14. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling had no report.
15. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Johnson thanked Planning Board Vice Chair Val Stewart for her presentation and for
staying during the Council’s discussion regarding step-backs. Councilmember Johnson encouraged the
Packet Page 26 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 23
public to participate or watch the Planning Board’s continued discussion regarding the Harbor Square
Master Plan on the second and fourth Wednesdays. Planning Board meetings regarding the Harbor Square
Master Plan are aired at 7:00 a.m. on Channels 21 and 39.
Council President Peterson congratulated ECA staff and ECA and PFD Boards for a fantastic event on
Saturday. The event was a great show of the community’s support. He thanked Mayor Earling for
attending.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Writers on the Sound Conference is this weekend. With regard to
Mr. Reidy’s questions regarding Resolution 1150, she reported the Council reaches consensus by head
nod but do not vote. She has not contacted the Port of Seattle because she did not believe the Port is
anything like the City of Edmonds.
In response to Mr. Reidy’s questions, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained the Council reaches
consensus by discussion. She has not spoken with the Port of Seattle; they are in the midst of very
expensive lawsuits regarding their meetings.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas congratulated the Edmonds School District Special Olympics Coach,
Megan Drobnicki, who was named Northwest Region Special Olympics Coach of the Year. Ms.
Drobnicki is a high school special education teacher; this was her first year coaching Special Olympics.
16. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(i).
At 10:55 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would convene in executive session
regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated the executive session was scheduled to
last approximately 15 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety
Complex. He stated action may occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present
at the executive session were: Mayor Earling and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis,
Peterson, Petso and Bloom. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday and Deputy City Clerk Linda
Hynd. The executive session concluded at 11:16 p.m.
Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 11:17 p.m.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO SETTLE ALL PENDING CLAIMS
IN THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY LITIGATION WITH KIMBERLY COLE, NOT TO EXCEED
$1,900. THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
17. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:18 p.m.
Packet Page 27 of 532
AM-5190 3. C.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Shawn Hunstock Submitted By:Nori Jacobson
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Committee Action: Approve for
Consent Agenda
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #134556 through #134692 dated October 4, 2012 for $1,865,907.81
(replacement check #134618 $5,487.85), and claim checks #134693 through #134852 dated October 11,
2012 for $845,113.27 (replacement checks #134693 $132.00, #134783 $25.00, #134828 $911.25 and
#134829 $68.61). Approval of payroll direct deposit & checks #51717 through #51735 for $451,069.13,
benefit checks #51736 through #51748 & wire payments of $193,350.01 for the period September 16,
2012 through September 30, 2012.
Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2012
Revenue:
Expenditure:3,355,440.22
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $2,711,021.08
Claims Reissued Checks $6,624.71
Total Claims $2,717,645.79
Payroll Employee checks & direct deposit $451,069.13
Payroll Benefit checks & wire payments $193,350.01
Total Payroll $644,419.14
Packet Page 28 of 532
Total Payroll $644,419.14
Attachments
Claim Checks 10-04-12
Claim Checks 10-11-12
Project Numbers 10-11-12
Payroll Benefit Sept 16-30
Payroll Summary Sept 16-30
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Shawn Hunstock 10/11/2012 10:10 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 10:49 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/11/2012 10:53 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 11:10 AM
Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 10/11/2012 08:32 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/11/2012
Packet Page 29 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134556 10/4/2012 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 311595 1-13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 69.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 6.56
Total :75.56
134557 10/4/2012 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 912502 FALL SOFTBALL SHIRTS
FALL SOFTBALL SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 247.49
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 23.51
Total :271.00
134558 10/4/2012 074186 ADELINE WYNNE 3-03975 #611021916-KK UTILITY REFUND
#611021916-KK Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 15.55
Total :15.55
134559 10/4/2012 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 11-1349 JANITORIAL SERVICE
JANITORIAL SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00
Total :334.00
134560 10/4/2012 073833 AMBURGEY, DERREK 2454 AMBURGEY/TRAVEL
AMBURGEY/TRAVEL
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 138.22
Total :138.22
134561 10/4/2012 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 21580001 655-6404271
UNIFORM SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 57.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 5.46
Total :62.96
1Page:
Packet Page 30 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134562 10/4/2012 074106 ARMSTRONG, JENNIFER ARMSTRONG100612 WOTS PRESENTER
"KEYS TO ARTICLE WRITING"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 386.00
"REPORTING 101"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :547.00
134563 10/4/2012 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0349751-IN 01-7500014
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 5,402.15
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 513.21
Total :5,915.36
134564 10/4/2012 073035 AVAGIMOVA, KARINE 1071 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 100.00
Total :100.00
134565 10/4/2012 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 79228 TROPHY ENGRAVING
ENGRAVING ON TROPHY FOR SENIORS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 8.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 0.81
Total :9.31
134566 10/4/2012 074108 BAUERMEISTER, ERICA RECHTIN BAUERMEISTER1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"TRACKING THE WILD CHARACTER
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134567 10/4/2012 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 9111 CEMETERY DISPLAY AD
EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY DISPLAY AD
130.000.640.536.200.440.00 108.00
Total :108.00
134568 10/4/2012 070641 BHARTI KIRCHNER KIRCHNER1007 WOTS PRESENTER
2Page:
Packet Page 31 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134568 10/4/2012 (Continued)070641 BHARTI KIRCHNER
"BANISH WRITING BLOCKS"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
"FLAVOR IT UP"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :268.00
134569 10/4/2012 074185 BROOKWOOD INVESTMENTS LLC 3-27625 #30073691 UTILITY REFUND
#30073691 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 20.28
Total :20.28
134570 10/4/2012 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 12150529 COPIER LEASE
COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 273.74
COPIER LEASE12150533
COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 30.65
Total :304.39
134571 10/4/2012 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA CARLSON15880 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING
ADVENTURES IN DRAWING #15880
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 305.50
Total :305.50
134572 10/4/2012 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP REGISTRATION FEES GREEN GARDENING WORKSHOPS
REGISTRATION FEES FOR DEBRA DILL FOR
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 50.00
Total :50.00
134573 10/4/2012 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 35767333 INV#35767333 ACCT#7898305185 EDMONDS PD
FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 227.12
TAX EXEMPT FILING FEE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 2.27
Total :229.39
3Page:
Packet Page 32 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134574 10/4/2012 074191 CHRISTOPHER & JENNIFER HAGEN 2-07225 #4243-1930645 UTILITY REFUND
#4243-1930645 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 182.72
Total :182.72
134575 10/4/2012 073667 COBURN, LI COBURN0927 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT
VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT @
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 70.00
Total :70.00
134576 10/4/2012 071680 CODE 4 LLC 9130 CORRECT INV#9310 CORRECT -EDMONDS PD
SAFARILAND HOLSTER
001.000.410.521.400.350.00 50.00
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.400.350.00 2.98
REMAINING CREDIT BAL ON INV#94639463
CR BAL FROM EXCH GUNS
001.000.410.521.400.350.00 -18.62
Total :34.36
134577 10/4/2012 072848 COPIERS NW INV755588 INV#INV755588 ACCT#HMH636 -EDMONDS PD
COPIER RENTAL 09/05 TO 10/4/12
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 226.77
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 21.54
Total :248.31
134578 10/4/2012 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING SEPT 2012 DRY CLEANING AUG/SEPT -EDMONDS PD
CLEANING/LAUNDRY AUG-SEPT 2012
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 977.68
Total :977.68
134579 10/4/2012 072278 CUETER, THAYER CUETER16098 LEAPING LIZARDS
LEAPING LIZARDS #16098
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 79.20
Total :79.20
4Page:
Packet Page 33 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134580 10/4/2012 074109 DAGG, CAROLE L DAGG1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"FACT INTO FICTION"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134581 10/4/2012 072189 DATASITE 29030 DOCUMENTS STORAGE
Document Storage
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 83.10
Total :83.10
134582 10/4/2012 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Sept 2012 DRS SEPTEMBER 2012 DRS CONTRIBUTIONS
Sept 2012 DRS contributions
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 158,835.85
Total :158,835.85
134583 10/4/2012 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 12-3303 MINUTE TAKING
9/25 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 276.00
Total :276.00
134584 10/4/2012 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 09302012 STATE LOBBYIST FOR SEPTEMBER
State lobbyist for September 2012
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 2,391.00
Total :2,391.00
134585 10/4/2012 074122 DRUMMOND, SHARI STORM STORM1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"HOW TO PROMOTE YOUR BOOK:
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134586 10/4/2012 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 12-2034.3 E3JA.SERVICES THRU 9/23/12
E3JA.Services thru 9/23/12
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 9,723.77
E3GA.SERVICES THRU 9/23/1212-2035.3
E3GA.Services thru 9/23/12
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 10,071.18
E3JA.SERVICES THRU 9/23/1212-2062.1
5Page:
Packet Page 34 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134586 10/4/2012 (Continued)070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC
E3JA.Services thru 9/23/12
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 352.00
Total :20,146.95
134587 10/4/2012 074110 DUARTE, STELLA POPE DUARTE1005 WOTS PRESENTER
PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOP MEMOIR
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 484.00
Total :484.00
134588 10/4/2012 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 15043 2000
WD 40/BRAKLEEN
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 79.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.56
Total :87.16
134589 10/4/2012 062190 EDMONDS POLICE DEPT DET BUY FUND 2012-2 DETECTIVE BUY FUND 3RD QTR 2012
INFORMANT PAYMENT 12-3102
001.000.410.521.210.490.00 20.00
Total :20.00
134590 10/4/2012 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 204732 INV#204732 CLIENT #308 -EDMONDS PD
METACAM 1.5 MG 180ML - DASH
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 195.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.260.310.00 18.57
Total :214.07
134591 10/4/2012 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-04400 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,058.78
Total :1,058.78
134592 10/4/2012 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 080250 COPIER MAINT
COPIER MAINT
001.000.230.512.501.450.00 95.01
6Page:
Packet Page 35 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :95.01134592 10/4/2012 008812 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
134593 10/4/2012 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 080305 CUST# MK5533 C5051 GQM52286 COPIER
Meter charges 08/30/12 - 09/30-12 B&
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 120.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 11.47
Total :132.19
134594 10/4/2012 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 080211 COPY MACHINE LEASE
COPY MACHINE LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 15.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 1.46
Total :16.82
134595 10/4/2012 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 080312 METER READING
9/30 to 10/30 Meter reading
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 239.42
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 22.74
Total :262.16
134596 10/4/2012 071967 ENG, STEPHEN ENG15805 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO #15805
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 63.00
Total :63.00
134597 10/4/2012 071108 ENVIROCARE INTERNATIONAL INC 10911 6071
C-403 SEWER/SLUDGE INCINERATOR
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 3,496.00
Total :3,496.00
134598 10/4/2012 074098 ERGO SYNCHRONUS SOLUTIONS 1 ON CALL CONSULTING SERVICES
ON CALL CONSULTING SERVICES
411.000.656.538.800.410.11 4,400.00
C-387 FIBER OPTIC2
7Page:
Packet Page 36 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134598 10/4/2012 (Continued)074098 ERGO SYNCHRONUS SOLUTIONS
C-387 FIBER OPTIC
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 1,650.00
Total :6,050.00
134599 10/4/2012 069095 EUROPE THROUGH THE BACK DOOR STEVES1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"TRAVEL WRITING"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134600 10/4/2012 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU26757 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.54
SUPPLIESWAMOU26763
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.15
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.87
Total :39.32
134601 10/4/2012 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 93012 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 7,820.00
Total :7,820.00
134602 10/4/2012 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 2420866 17983
FITTINGS FOR NON POT
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 548.65
Freight
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 123.00
9.5% Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 63.81
Total :735.46
8Page:
Packet Page 37 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134603 10/4/2012 067004 FINE LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 22088-01 GAUGE SEAL ASSEMBLY
GAUGE SEAL ASSEMBLY
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,700.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 28.91
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 164.25
Total :1,893.16
134604 10/4/2012 074111 FLENNIKEN, KATHLEEN FLENNIKEN1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"WRITE ABOUT LOVE:LOVE POEMS FRIENDS
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
"POETRY READING"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 55.00
Total :216.00
134605 10/4/2012 072932 FRIEDRICH, KODY FRIEDRICH15883 IRISH DANCE CLASSES
IRISH DANCE #15883
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 64.00
IRISH DANCE #15887
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 98.00
Total :162.00
134606 10/4/2012 011900 FRONTIER 253-012-9189 AUTO DIALER
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.08
AUTO DIALER253-017-7256
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 217.18
AUTO DIALER425-771-5553
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 93.07
Total :351.33
134607 10/4/2012 069091 GALBRAITH, KATHRYN O.GALBRAITH1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"CREATING CHILDREN'S PICTURE BOOKS FROM
9Page:
Packet Page 38 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134607 10/4/2012 (Continued)069091 GALBRAITH, KATHRYN O.
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134608 10/4/2012 073922 GAVIOLA, NIKKA GAVIOLA15809 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TKO #15809
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 140.00
TKO #15813
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 165.00
Total :305.00
134609 10/4/2012 073795 GOMPERTZ, RON GOMPERTZ1005 WOTS PRESENTER
"PRECONFERENCE:SOCIAL MEDIA CRITIQUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 500.00
"OPTIMIZING FOR AMAZON"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :634.00
134610 10/4/2012 072910 GONZALEZ, ANN GONZALEZ1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"SPEAK WITH THE HANDS:GESTURES IN
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134611 10/4/2012 012560 HACH COMPANY 7963238 112830
COD DIGEST VIAL
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 639.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 37.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 64.32
Total :741.27
134612 10/4/2012 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007D7450 036570
PIPE FITTINGS/PVC PIPE/VALVE BALLS
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 1,696.50
Freight
10Page:
Packet Page 39 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134612 10/4/2012 (Continued)060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 12.30
Total :1,708.80
134613 10/4/2012 006030 HDR ENGINEERING INC 00024404-B 186676
C-385 SWITCHGEAR UPGRADE
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 2,560.14
Total :2,560.14
134614 10/4/2012 069952 HUGHES, HOLLY HUGHES1005 WOTS PRESENTER
"PRE-CONFERENCE POETRY CRITIQUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 520.00
Total :520.00
134615 10/4/2012 070742 HURLEY, DAN HURLEY1005 WOTS PRESENTER
"PRE-CONFERENCE FICTION CRITIQUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 364.00
Total :364.00
134616 10/4/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2151294 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 91.49
SUPPLIES2151311
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 14.22
SUPPLIES2152817
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 33.93
SUPPLIES2155334
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 3.16
Total :142.80
134617 10/4/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2153711 Hanging file folders DSD
Hanging file folders DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 15.97
Office supplies DSD2154386
11Page:
Packet Page 40 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134617 10/4/2012 (Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
Office supplies DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 419.83
Total :435.80
134618 10/4/2012 069264 J & K ASSOCIATES 19288 Street - Crack Sealer -NUVO Fomulation
Street - Crack Sealer -NUVO Fomulation
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 4,640.35
Freight
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 399.00
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 448.50
Total :5,487.85
134619 10/4/2012 074112 JANICE HUSSEIN HUSSEIN1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"NOVEL ARCS"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 234.00
Total :234.00
134620 10/4/2012 074190 JEANNE RICE-GILGAN 4-40050 #4221-1902673 UTILITY REFUND
#4221-1902673 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 182.32
Total :182.32
134621 10/4/2012 074193 JENIFFER CHRISTIAN CHRISTIAN0928 REFUND
REFUND -CUSTOMER CHANGED MIND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 32.00
Total :32.00
134622 10/4/2012 072917 JENNIFER MCCORD,JENNIFER MCCORD ASSOC LLCMCCORRD1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"AUTHOR TOOLKIT: 5 WAYS TO PREPARE FOR
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134623 10/4/2012 070145 JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS 49387 PROMOTION AD IN OCTOBER JOURN AL
Promotional ad for Edmonds in October
001.000.240.513.110.440.00 634.00
12Page:
Packet Page 41 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :634.00134623 10/4/2012 070145 070145 JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS
134624 10/4/2012 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 3622039 INV#3622039 CUST#100828 -EDMONDS PD
10 CASES MULTI USE COPY PAPER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 246.20
HANDLING FEE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 36.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 23.39
Total :306.49
134625 10/4/2012 073924 KEARNS, JESSIKA CHRISTINE KEARNS15771 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO #15771
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 97.50
TAEKWON DO #15775
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 42.00
Total :139.50
134626 10/4/2012 074184 KRESTEL, LES 074184 KRESTEL/TRAVEL
KRESTEL/TRAVEL
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 450.34
Total :450.34
134627 10/4/2012 074124 LAKE, KATHRIN LAKE1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"WRITING WITH COLD FEET"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 234.00
Total :234.00
134628 10/4/2012 073136 LANG, ROBERT LANG0929 ANDERSON CENTER MONITOR
ANDERSON CENTER MONITOR
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 12.00
Total :12.00
134629 10/4/2012 072914 LAUGHTLAND, AMANDA LAUGHTLAND1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL:FROM POSTCARDS TO
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
13Page:
Packet Page 42 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :134.00134629 10/4/2012 072914 072914 LAUGHTLAND, AMANDA
134630 10/4/2012 072059 LEE, NICOLE 1053 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 123.96
Total :123.96
134631 10/4/2012 018140 LEIN, JONATHAN 0283 TRAVEL/LEIN
TRAVEL/LEIN
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 479.46
Total :479.46
134632 10/4/2012 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1066 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.32
INTERPRETER FEE1067
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.32
INTERPRETER FEE1068
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.32
Total :264.96
134633 10/4/2012 074105 MARTINEZ, SARAH MARTINEZ1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"WORKING WITH AN EDITOR;PANEL
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 160.00
Total :160.00
134634 10/4/2012 074189 MAURINE GUNN 2-36535 #30073096 UTILITY REFUND
#30073096 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 28.40
Total :28.40
134635 10/4/2012 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 37586540 123106800
PROPANE GAS TORCH/WATER SOLDER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 156.63
Freight
14Page:
Packet Page 43 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134635 10/4/2012 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 11.31
12310680037939715
PIPE FITTINGS/FLANGE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 291.59
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.74
12310680037939819
PIPE FITTING/STRUT MOUNT CLAMP
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 164.62
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.83
Total :641.72
134636 10/4/2012 074187 MICHAEL & JENNIFER HARRIS 3-37885 #4221-1923004 UTILITY REFUND
#4221-1923004 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 259.97
Total :259.97
134637 10/4/2012 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER0926 GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL
GYM MONITOR FOR 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 35.00
Total :35.00
134638 10/4/2012 073918 MINTON, SHARON MINTON15735 PRENATAL YOGA CLASSES
PRENATAL YOGA #15735
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 138.00
Total :138.00
134639 10/4/2012 069365 MOON CONSTRUCTION INC 12023 1207
SWITCHGEAR ACCESS CATWALK
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 49,253.99
Total :49,253.99
134640 10/4/2012 071929 MORRELL, JESSICA MORRELL1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"CONFLICT"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 261.00
15Page:
Packet Page 44 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :261.00134640 10/4/2012 071929 071929 MORRELL, JESSICA
134641 10/4/2012 074114 MUNRO, JENNIFER D MUNRO1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"GUFFAWING AT GRIEF:HUMOR IN PERSONAL
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134642 10/4/2012 063034 NCL 310558 13465
PIPETS/BOD STANDARD/BUFFER SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 534.10
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 32.58
Total :566.68
134643 10/4/2012 074113 NEIL MCNEILL MCNEILL1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"IT WAS A DARK &STORMY NIGHT
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134644 10/4/2012 073678 NORTHSHORE FITNESS LLC NORTHSHORE15863 ZUMBA CLASSES
ZUMBA #15863
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 19.80
ZUMBA #15934
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 14.40
Total :34.20
134645 10/4/2012 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-538992 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:YOST PARK
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 310.99
Total :310.99
134646 10/4/2012 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 000 322 Planning Brd Minutes 9/12/12
Planning Brd Minutes 9/12/12
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 416.00
Total :416.00
134647 10/4/2012 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 526612 INV#526612 ACCT 520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
16Page:
Packet Page 45 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134647 10/4/2012 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
SHARPIE CD/DVD MARKERS
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 7.90
AVERY FILE FOLDER LABELS
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 14.99
DYNO WHITE ADDRESS LABELS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 44.52
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 2.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.23
Total :73.82
134648 10/4/2012 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 535658 CALENDAR
FRONT DESK CALENDAR
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 8.60
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.82
SHEET PROTECTORS546849
SHEET PROTECTORS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 14.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.36
Total :25.12
134649 10/4/2012 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 505873 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 222.69
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 21.15
OFFICE SUPPLIES505985
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 42.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 4.01
17Page:
Packet Page 46 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :290.01134649 10/4/2012 063511 063511 OFFICE MAX INC
134650 10/4/2012 074116 PAJER, BERNADETTE PAJER1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"TRUST YOUR TRIGGERS*
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134651 10/4/2012 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD ADMIN PC - 3 QT 2012 ADMIN PETTY CASH 3RD QUARTER
CAKE, FRUIT -GANNON RETIREMENT
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 30.97
ENVELOPES -PEER SUPPORT BALLOT
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.00
PAPER FOR ANNUAL REPORT
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.40
DUCT TAPE FOR AC TRUCK
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 2.93
CHAIR & TABLE -MASS ARREST KIT
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 76.63
PRISONER FOOD 12-3046
001.000.410.523.600.310.00 6.19
CASHIER CHECK -KC SUP CT RECORDS
001.000.410.521.110.490.00 10.00
POSTER BOARD FOR MAP BACKING
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 71.12
MICROFIBER CLOTHS FOR PATROL
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.96
PARKING FOR TARGET ZERO MTG
001.000.410.521.710.490.00 6.00
COOKIES FOR 9/16 OPEN HOUSE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 65.78
SANDWICHES OPEN HOUSE VOLUNTEERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 32.84
SCSPCA BREAKFAST - COMPAAN,
001.000.410.521.100.430.00 22.00
REFUND FROM KC SUPERIOR COURT RECORDS
001.000.410.521.110.490.00 -9.50
18Page:
Packet Page 47 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :348.32134651 10/4/2012 008400 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD
134652 10/4/2012 074107 PHILIP GEORGE ATHANS ATHANS1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"BUILDING WORLDS"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134653 10/4/2012 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2341875 211958
GLASS CLOTH
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 8.91
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 0.85
2119582429597
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 34.03
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 3.23
2119582458558
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 173.42
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 16.47
Total :236.91
134654 10/4/2012 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC PST0927 REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 100.00
Total :100.00
134655 10/4/2012 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,701.05
Total :1,701.05
134656 10/4/2012 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 010-187-400-6 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST /METER
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST /METER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 52.25
19Page:
Packet Page 48 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134656 10/4/2012 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S023-075-700-7
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 68.82
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST191-676-600-7
LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N /METER275-316-600-4
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N /METER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 295.90
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW277-636-500-5
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 5.79
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 21.99
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 21.99
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.99
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 21.99
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 21.98
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST368-997-600-3
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 48.93
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE525-492-600-8
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 96.52
FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW532-232-313-9
FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 145.11
LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR /567-289-500-9
LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA DR /
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 35.65
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72590-308-500-8
20Page:
Packet Page 49 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134656 10/4/2012 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 64.57
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /643-956-600-8
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 152.90
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700649-032-700-1
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 713.92
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE885-190-800-7
LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W991-966-110-9
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 60.37
Total :1,939.42
134657 10/4/2012 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 12-632 COURT SECURITY
COURT SECURITY
001.000.230.512.500.410.00 2,812.50
Total :2,812.50
134658 10/4/2012 074117 PURCELL, KIMBERLY MINTEN PURCELL1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"YA SUSPENSE"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 359.00
Total :359.00
134659 10/4/2012 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 77597 INV#77597 - EDMONDS PD
TOWING 2011 SUBARU #AIM9244
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total :173.01
134660 10/4/2012 071335 RHAMEY, RAY RHAMEY1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"CRAFTING KILLER DESCRIPTION AND
21Page:
Packet Page 50 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134660 10/4/2012 (Continued)071335 RHAMEY, RAY
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 311.00
Total :311.00
134661 10/4/2012 072474 ROBERT V DUGONI DUGONI1005 WOTS PRESENTER
'YOU'VE GOT THE POWER:STORY TELLING
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 484.00
Total :484.00
134662 10/4/2012 074118 ROUGH, BONNIE JULENE ROUGH1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"FINDING YOUR VOICE AS A MEMOIRIST
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
PROVIDE UP TO 20 MANUSCRIPT CRITIQUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 475.00
Total :609.00
134663 10/4/2012 074119 RUSSELL, GERALDINE G RUSSELL1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"FORMATTING FOR SELF-PUBLISHING
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134664 10/4/2012 073959 SALGADO, ANGELICA SALGADO15867 ZUMBA CLASSES
ZUMBA #15867
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 149.40
Total :149.40
134665 10/4/2012 074188 SEAN STEEN & GAIL ROWELL 3-18350 #12-0263FC UTILITY REFUND
#12-0263FC Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 61.76
Total :61.76
134666 10/4/2012 074121 SELFORS, SUZANNE ALICE SELFORS1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"WIMPS AND WONDERKIDS"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 164.00
Total :164.00
134667 10/4/2012 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 87332 E2FB.SERVICES THRU 9/15/12
22Page:
Packet Page 51 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134667 10/4/2012 (Continued)070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC
E2FB.Services thru 9/15/12
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,880.87
Total :1,880.87
134668 10/4/2012 074194 SHAVER, MARCIA SHAVER1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"WALKING TOWARD YOUR DREAMS
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
134669 10/4/2012 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT 2449 SLENKER/TRAVEL
SLENKER/TRAVEL
411.000.656.538.800.430.00 110.39
Total :110.39
134670 10/4/2012 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 Q4-2012 Q4-2012 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT PAYMENT
Q4-2012 Fire Services Contract Payment
001.000.390.522.200.510.00 1,555,694.75
Total :1,555,694.75
134671 10/4/2012 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2013-2711-1 610 PINE ST
610 PINE ST
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.64
750 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY2015-5730-3
750 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 86.52
750 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY2016-1027-6
750 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 16.17
SPRINKLER SYSTEM201762101
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 105.44
OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER202161535
OLYMPIC BEACH FISHING PIER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 303.27
205 5TH AVE S2044-6743-5
23Page:
Packet Page 52 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134671 10/4/2012 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
205 5TH AVE S
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 64.76
Total :606.80
134672 10/4/2012 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2001-2487-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9933 100TH AVE W
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 50.25
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 7002004-2241-8
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,360.36
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD2004-9683-4
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 135.01
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW2014-3123-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.64
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WAY2015-6343-4
TRAFFIC LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WAY
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 50.18
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 1002017-0375-8
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 23190 100
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 44.81
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST2042-9221-3
CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.06
Total :2,702.31
134673 10/4/2012 037521 SNO CO TREASURER 00479000100302 2012 SECOND HALF SURFACE WATER TAX
2012 Surface Water Charges ~23009 88
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 263.49
Total :263.49
134674 10/4/2012 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES Fraley-Monillas SCC CM Fraley-Monillas attend Sno Cnty
CM Fraley-Monillas attend Sno Cnty
001.000.110.511.100.490.00 35.00
24Page:
Packet Page 53 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :35.00134674 10/4/2012 067609 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES
134675 10/4/2012 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 51407 Rubber stamp for DSD
Rubber stamp for DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 70.68
Total :70.68
134676 10/4/2012 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 10012012 103584
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 29.95
Total :29.95
134677 10/4/2012 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 58862 INV 58862 EDMONDS PD POLICE NEGOTIATIONS
2.8 HRS PREP FOR POLICE MEDIATION
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 812.00
MILEAGE TO/FM EDMONDS
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 27.75
Total :839.75
134678 10/4/2012 072555 SYSTEMS DESIGN WEST LLC ED0912 POSTAGE FOR PRIVATE STATEMENTS
EMS Postage for private statements
001.000.390.526.100.420.00 0.90
Total :0.90
134679 10/4/2012 073970 TALLMAN, TYLER TALLMAN0925 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT~
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 680.00
Total :680.00
134680 10/4/2012 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1795002 NEWSPAPER ADS
Hearing-taking notes/min.Exec sessions
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 36.12
NEWSPAPER ADS1795104
Ord. 3894
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 29.24
Total :65.36
25Page:
Packet Page 54 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134681 10/4/2012 073404 THE WILLIAMS LAW FIRM PLLC WILLIAMS1007 WOTS PRESENTER
"BUSINESS OF WRITING"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
134682 10/4/2012 074192 THOMAS & KAREN JUREWICZ 2-33025 #633-001346761 UTILITY REFUND
#633-001346761 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 58.82
Total :58.82
134683 10/4/2012 072572 TRENCHLESS CONSTRUCTION SERVIC 4379 RETENTION FEE
RETENTION FEE/ELECTRICAL POWER FOR
132.000.640.594.760.310.00 390.00
Total :390.00
134684 10/4/2012 074120 TRENGA-SCHEIN, MICHAEL SCHEIN1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"IT'S ALL ONE MUSE"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134685 10/4/2012 063939 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045-74499 TYLER CASHIERING TRAINING
Tyler Cashiering Consultant training
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 993.74
Tyler Cashiering Consultant training
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 993.74
Tyler Cashiering Consultant training
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 993.74
Tyler Cashiering Consultant training
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 1,987.50
Total :4,968.72
134686 10/4/2012 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-8840 MINI PARK PINE TREES
TOP AND SHAPE MINI PARK PINE TREES AND
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 3,200.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 304.00
26Page:
Packet Page 55 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :3,504.00134686 10/4/2012 067195 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS
134687 10/4/2012 045912 WASPC DUES2012-00615 ASSOCIATE DUES LAWLESS EDMONDS PD
ASSOCIATE DUES - LAWLESS
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 75.00
Total :75.00
134688 10/4/2012 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 5651 INV#5651 - EDMONDS PD
3,000 #10 WINDOW ENVELOPES
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 240.15
1,000 BLUE REMITTANCE ENVELOPES
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 85.66
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 30.95
Total :356.76
134689 10/4/2012 068270 WETHERHOLT & ASSOCIATES PS 36101 C-383 BLDG.ROOF REPLACEMENT
C-383 BLDG.ROOF REPLACEMENT
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 555.00
Total :555.00
134690 10/4/2012 072924 WHITE, STEVEN WHITE1006 WOTS PRESENTER
"MAKING ANY WRITING SUSPENSEFUL
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
134691 10/4/2012 070123 WOODARD, MARCIA WOODARD1005 WOTS PRESENTER
PRE-CONFERENCE NON-FICTION CRITIQUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 364.00
Total :364.00
134692 10/4/2012 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 28 UMPIRING
UMPRING OF MEN'S AND CO-ED GAMES
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 2,574.00
Total :2,574.00
Bank total :1,871,395.66137Vouchers for bank code :front
27Page:
Packet Page 56 of 532
10/04/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
7:36:43AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
1,871,395.66Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report137
28Page:
Packet Page 57 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134693 10/5/2012 073918 MINTON, SHARON MINTON15735 PRENATAL YOGA CLASSES
PRENATAL YOGA #15735
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 132.00
Total :132.00
134694 10/9/2012 070037 TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION INC E2DB.Ret Rel E2DB.RETAINAGE RELEASE
E2DB.Retainage Release
132.000.000.223.400.000.00 70,297.89
Total :70,297.89
134695 10/11/2012 072627 911 ETC INC 20845 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT
Monthly 911 database maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 100.00
Total :100.00
134696 10/11/2012 073947 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC 166674 Drug testing services
Drug testing services
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 52.00
Drug testing services
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 52.00
Total :104.00
134697 10/11/2012 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 311774 RODENT CONTROL @ MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
RODENT CONTROL @ MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 82.12
RODENT CONTROL313267
RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 114.98
Total :197.10
134698 10/11/2012 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 137.33
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW3-0197-0800897
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
1Page:
Packet Page 58 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134698 10/11/2012 (Continued)061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 27.57
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 104.75
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 104.75
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 104.75
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 104.75
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 104.74
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 146.81
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 64.98
Total :900.43
134699 10/11/2012 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 15772 BRONZE PLAQUE
EAGLE SCOUT CAST BRONZE PLAQUE WITH
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 165.90
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.42
Total :189.22
134700 10/11/2012 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC VI97 NPDES SAMPLING
NPDES SAMPLING
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 165.00
Total :165.00
134701 10/11/2012 001634 AQUA QUIP 699887-1 50609
CHLORINE TABS
2Page:
Packet Page 59 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134701 10/11/2012 (Continued)001634 AQUA QUIP
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 329.97
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.11 31.35
Total :361.32
134702 10/11/2012 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6368512 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 56.22
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 5.34
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS655-6372982
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
3Page:
Packet Page 60 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6372983
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.03
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.02
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS &MATS655-6372984
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.45
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.61
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6380449
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS655-6384971
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
4Page:
Packet Page 61 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6384972
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.03
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.02
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS &MATS655-6384973
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.45
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.61
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6392296
5Page:
Packet Page 62 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS655-6396798
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6396799
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.03
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.02
6Page:
Packet Page 63 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS &MATS655-6396800
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.45
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.61
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6404267
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS655-6408820
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
7Page:
Packet Page 64 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6408821
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.03
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.02
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS &MATS655-6408822
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.45
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.65
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.62
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6416154
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS655-6420681
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
8Page:
Packet Page 65 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS655-6420682
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.03
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.02
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS &MATS655-6420683
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
9Page:
Packet Page 66 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134702 10/11/2012 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.45
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.55
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.61
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
Total :413.74
134703 10/11/2012 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6416159 21580001
UNIFORM
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 67.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.40
Total :73.80
134704 10/11/2012 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6416153 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 116.30
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 11.05
UNIFORM SERVICES655-6431645
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 40.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.80
Total :171.15
134705 10/11/2012 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0349956-IN Fleet - Regular Unleaded 6,600 Gal
Fleet - Regular Unleaded 6,600 Gal
511.000.657.548.680.340.11 21,169.50
WA St Excise Tax Gas, WA Oil Spill
511.000.657.548.680.340.11 2,640.99
Diesel 3,060 Gal
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 9,737.84
10Page:
Packet Page 67 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134705 10/11/2012 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM
WA St Excise Tax Gas, WA Oil Spill
511.000.657.548.680.340.10 1,224.55
Bio-Diesel 340 Gal
511.000.657.548.680.340.13 1,706.73
WA St Excise Tax Gas, WA Oil Spill
511.000.657.548.680.340.13 140.44
WA St Svc Fees
511.000.657.548.680.340.13 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.13 4.75
Total :36,674.80
134706 10/11/2012 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 66469 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.02
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.02
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 153.52
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 498.44
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 498.43
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 14.16
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 14.16
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 14.58
Total :1,491.33
134707 10/11/2012 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0912 Background check services
Background check services
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 125.00
11Page:
Packet Page 68 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :125.0013470710/11/2012 069076 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC
134708 10/11/2012 063408 BARTELS & STOUT INC SRI1231A VMC SERVICE
VMC SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 142.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.31 13.54
Total :156.04
134709 10/11/2012 073853 BECKWITH CONSULTING GROUP 10012012 STRATEGIC PLAN TASK #19
Strategic Plan Task #19 partial
001.000.240.513.110.410.00 4,200.00
Total :4,200.00
134710 10/11/2012 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 499635 Fleet - Brake Kits Inventory
Fleet - Brake Kits Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 453.14
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 43.05
Total :496.19
134711 10/11/2012 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 460 Annual maintenance fee Permit Trax,
Annual maintenance fee Permit Trax,
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 7,300.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 693.50
Total :7,993.50
134712 10/11/2012 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 6249 E1JE.SERVICES THRU 9/30/12
E1JE.Services thru 9/30/12
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 9,774.50
Total :9,774.50
134713 10/11/2012 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 953434 INV#953434 - EDMONDS PD -MACHADO
S/S UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 135.90
SEW NAMETAG ON SHIRTS
12Page:
Packet Page 69 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134713 10/11/2012 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 2.00
CLOTH NAMETAG " DL MACHADO"
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.90
METAL BUTTONS W/ TOGGLES
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.95
UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 324.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.67
Total :526.42
134714 10/11/2012 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 298885 E9FB.GRAVEL
E9FB.Gravel
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 756.00
9.5% Sales Tax
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 71.82
Total :827.82
134715 10/11/2012 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 298739 Parks - Crushed Rock
Parks - Crushed Rock
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 575.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 54.64
Total :629.81
134716 10/11/2012 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 91653954 Street - Cement
Street - Cement
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 343.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.610.310.00 32.59
Total :375.59
134717 10/11/2012 072828 CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT 729002 Unit 3 - Parts (ball joints)
Unit 3 - Parts (ball joints)
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 895.10
13Page:
Packet Page 70 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134717 10/11/2012 (Continued)072828 CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.42
Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 74.42
Total :981.94
134718 10/11/2012 068484 CEMEX LLC 9424568782 Roadway - Asphalt
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 210.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 19.95
Roadway - Asphalt9424568784
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 210.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 19.95
Roadway - Asphalt9424609865
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 140.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 13.30
Roadway - Asphalt9424618889
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 26.60
Roadway - Asphalt9424672064
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 575.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 54.63
Total :1,549.43
134719 10/11/2012 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN09120990 2954000
CYLINDER RENTAL
14Page:
Packet Page 71 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134719 10/11/2012 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 55.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.23
Total :60.23
134720 10/11/2012 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 185966 Water - Supplies
Water - Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 45.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.27
Total :49.27
134721 10/11/2012 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN09120989 HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS BALLOONS
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTIC BALLOONS FOR
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 11.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 1.07
Total :12.32
134722 10/11/2012 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 22019266 COPIER LEASE PW
PW copier lease, remaining "2011
001.000.650.519.910.450.00 52.00
Total :52.00
134723 10/11/2012 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I12002660 Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis
Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 567.00
Total :567.00
134724 10/11/2012 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 9680 INV#9680 CUST #45 -EDMONDS PD
NEXTEL PHONE FOR NARCS 09/2012
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 129.34
INV#9681 CUST#1430 -EDMONDS PD9681
VERIZON PHONE NARCS 09/2012
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 99.51
INV#9682 CUST#1655 -EDMONDS PD9682
15Page:
Packet Page 72 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134724 10/11/2012 (Continued)019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
VERIZON INTERNET SERVICES 8/12
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 40.01
Total :268.86
134725 10/11/2012 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 9671 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
411.000.655.535.800.472.00 27,602.00
Total :27,602.00
134726 10/11/2012 022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 4609 E2FD.LK BALLINGER/MCALEER CREEK QTR
E2FD.Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Forum
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 2,900.00
Total :2,900.00
134727 10/11/2012 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2478559 CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR MATS &
CLEANING SUPPLIES &SPRAYER HEAD
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 41.22
Freight
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 4.39
Total :50.61
134728 10/11/2012 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC OCT-12 C/A CITYOFED00001
Oct-12 Fiber Optics Internet Connection
001.000.310.518.870.420.00 916.20
Total :916.20
134729 10/11/2012 070323 COMCAST 0721433 CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES
BUNDLED SERVICES FOR CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 116.47
Total :116.47
134730 10/11/2012 062891 COOK PAGING WA 8832215 INVOICE #
WATER WATCH PAGERS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 4.25
16Page:
Packet Page 73 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :4.2513473010/11/2012 062891 062891 COOK PAGING WA
134731 10/11/2012 073834 COOPERB - BATTERIES PLUS 102252-01 4257752525
BATTERIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 17.98
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.87
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.27
Total :26.12
134732 10/11/2012 074220 CRMA INVESTMENTS LLC 4-29500 #4291-1949036 UTILITY REFUND
#4291-1949036 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 87.96
Total :87.96
134733 10/11/2012 074227 CRMA INVESTMENTS LLC 4-12675 #4291-1944942 UTILITY REFUND
#4291-1944942 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 85.29
Total :85.29
134734 10/11/2012 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC E1JE.Pmt 2 E1JE.PROGRESS PAYMENT 2 THRU
E1JE.Progress Payment 2 thru 9/28/12
412.100.630.594.320.650.00 212,754.57
E1JE.Ret 2
412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -9,714.82
Total :203,039.75
134735 10/11/2012 072189 DATASITE 75651 INV#75651 - EDMONDS PD
SHREDDING 2 TOTES 09/13/12
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 80.00
Total :80.00
134736 10/11/2012 072189 DATASITE 75619 SHREDDING SERVICES/CABINETS
Doc Shred Services City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 25.00
Doc Shred Services Finance
17Page:
Packet Page 74 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134736 10/11/2012 (Continued)072189 DATASITE
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 25.00
Total :50.00
134737 10/11/2012 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 155976 INV#155976 - EDMONDS PD
CALIBRATION #GHD 02443
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 75.00
9.2% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 6.91
Total :81.91
134738 10/11/2012 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2012 CTS CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for September 2012
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 940.00
Total :940.00
134739 10/11/2012 006635 DEPT OF LICENSING RESERVE DEPOSIT Reserve Deposit for Mike Thies,Code
Reserve Deposit for Mike Thies,Code
001.000.620.558.800.490.00 25.00
Total :25.00
134740 10/11/2012 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 12-3304 MINUTE TAKING
10-2-12 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 417.00
Total :417.00
134741 10/11/2012 007253 DUNN LUMBER 1473689 Boys & Girls Club- Wood Supplies
Boys & Girls Club- Wood Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 110.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.47
City Park Bldg - Lumber1487850
City Park Bldg - Lumber
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 47.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.49
18Page:
Packet Page 75 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :172.3413474110/11/2012 007253 007253 DUNN LUMBER
134742 10/11/2012 073910 EDMONDS COMMUNITY SOLAR COOP 3rd Quarter 2012 FAC Solar Elect System Production
FAC Solar Elect System Production
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 84.75
Total :84.75
134743 10/11/2012 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2012-10-01 10/12 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE
10/12 Recreation Services Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 5,000.00
Total :5,000.00
134744 10/11/2012 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-07490 16113 75TH PL W
16113 75TH PL W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 60.19
18410 92ND AVE W3-38565
18410 92ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.57
23823 76TH AVE W5-10351
23823 76TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 49.89
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK6-00025
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 649.84
CITY FISHING DOCK &RESTROOM6-00200
CITY FISHING DOCK &RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 941.28
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 451.29
CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 675.24
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,399.65
19Page:
Packet Page 76 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134744 10/11/2012 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 360.40
310 6TH AVE N6-02727
310 6TH AVE N
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 253.54
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD -SPRINKLER6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD -SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 210.36
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER6-02900
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,295.02
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 371.62
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 111.32
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 202.30
8100 185TH PL SW6-04425
8100 185TH PL SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 369.32
SIERRA PARK6-04450
SIERRA PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 424.23
BALLINGER PARK6-07775
BALLINGER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 216.94
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 986.27
YOST PARK POOL6-08525
YOST PARK POOL
20Page:
Packet Page 77 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134744 10/11/2012 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 3,398.42
Total :12,456.69
134745 10/11/2012 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 174223 INV#174223 CLIENT #5118 -EDMONDS PD
NEUTER DOG - IMPOUND #8722
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 108.00
SPAY DOG - IMPOUND #8723
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 150.00
ADD'L CHG - IMPOUND #8723
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 37.50
NEUTER CAT - IMPOUND #8646
001.000.410.521.700.490.01 44.75
Total :340.25
134746 10/11/2012 068803 EJ USA INC 3532780 Storm - Frames, Covers, Grates,Bolts
Storm - Frames, Covers, Grates,Bolts
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 4,647.54
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 441.52
Total :5,089.06
134747 10/11/2012 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 079892 WATER SEWER COPY USE
Water Sewer Copy Use
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.81
Water Sewer Copy Use
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.81
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.55
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.55
PW COPY USE079894
PW Copy Use
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 20.40
PW Copy Use
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 11.56
21Page:
Packet Page 78 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134747 10/11/2012 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
PW Copy Use
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 11.56
PW Copy Use
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.16
PW Copy Use
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 8.16
PW Copy Use
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 8.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.94
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.310.00 1.10
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 1.10
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.78
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.78
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.76
FLEET COPY USE079908
Fleet Copy Use 5/21-6/21/12
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 138.29
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.14
Total :238.61
134748 10/11/2012 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU26674 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.40
Total :4.60
134749 10/11/2012 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 2441293 17983
22Page:
Packet Page 79 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134749 10/11/2012 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
STRUT CLAMP
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.65
Total :19.05
134750 10/11/2012 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0352463 Water Hydrant Replacement - 5th &Alder
Water Hydrant Replacement - 5th &Alder
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2,387.04
7.7% sales tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 183.80
Water - Main St Project - Water Main0353091
Water - Main St Project - Water Main
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 6,500.08
9.5% Sales Tax
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 617.51
Total :9,688.43
134751 10/11/2012 072493 FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC 128165 WADE JAMES CABLE INSTALLATION
Fiber cable installation at Wade James
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 659.59
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 62.66
Total :722.25
134752 10/11/2012 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 203584 September 2012 Section 125 plan fees
September 2012 Section 125 plan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 51.10
October 2012 Flexicommute fplan fees204341
October 2012 Flexicommute fplan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 25.00
Total :76.10
134753 10/11/2012 011900 FRONTIER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT
23Page:
Packet Page 80 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134753 10/11/2012 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 303.37
TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 303.37
POINT EDWARDS CIRCUIT LINE SR253-003-6887
POINT EDWARDS CIRCUIT LINE SR
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 41.67
LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031
LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 46.84
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-776-1281
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 41.53
LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE425-776-2742
LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACCESS LINE
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 26.02
CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH AVE N425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 110.94
Total :873.74
134754 10/11/2012 011900 FRONTIER 425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 67.03
Total :67.03
134755 10/11/2012 073821 GEODESIGN INC 0912-221 E1JE.SERVICES THRU 9/28/12
E1JE.Services thru 9/28/12
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 1,943.00
Total :1,943.00
134756 10/11/2012 074225 GERDES, STEVEN GERDES0924 REFUND
REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 400.00
Total :400.00
24Page:
Packet Page 81 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134757 10/11/2012 012199 GRAINGER 9925404726 Storm - Work Gloves, Ear Plugs
Storm - Work Gloves, Ear Plugs
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 461.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 43.85
FAC - Emergency Battery Pack9927517178
FAC - Emergency Battery Pack
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 81.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.77
Plaza Rm - V Belt9929365964
Plaza Rm - V Belt
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.68
FAC - Linear Fluorescent emergency9931664016
FAC - Linear Fluorescent emergency
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 124.02
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.78
Total :738.63
134758 10/11/2012 012233 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 962688733 E6MA.MATERIALS-GRAYBAR
E6MA.Breakaway Banner Arms
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 33,094.95
E6MA.Breakawy Banner Arms,Round
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 15,765.80
9.5% Sales Tax
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 4,641.77
Total :53,502.52
134759 10/11/2012 012560 HACH COMPANY 7967636 112830
PIPET TIPS
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 101.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 9.63
25Page:
Packet Page 82 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :111.0313475910/11/2012 012560 012560 HACH COMPANY
134760 10/11/2012 012560 HACH COMPANY 7949258 Water Quality - (12) Chlorine Sets
Water Quality - (12) Chlorine Sets
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 589.08
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 37.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 59.57
Water Quality - (12) Chlorine Sets7954038
Water Quality - (12) Chlorine Sets
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 589.08
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 37.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 59.57
Total :1,373.20
134761 10/11/2012 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007D7664 036570
PVC PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 44.80
Total :44.80
134762 10/11/2012 074096 HENDERSON, YOUNG & COMPANY 544-1202 P&R IMPACT FEE STUDY &ANALYSIS
PARK AND RECREATION IMPACT FEE STUDY
001.000.640.576.800.410.00 231.00
Total :231.00
134763 10/11/2012 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1091708 6035322500959949
PAINT SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 76.43
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.26
60353225009599497042164
COPPER PIPE/FITTING REDUCER/CAST UNION
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 455.87
26Page:
Packet Page 83 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134763 10/11/2012 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 43.31
Total :582.87
134764 10/11/2012 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1076666 0205
ENG MAX D8
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.98
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.14
02052043258
HOSE KIT, HEX
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.86
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.60
02052043260
ADHESIVE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.74
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.40
02052091379
PAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.47
0205280106
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 49.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.69
020530358
BRUSHES, PLIERS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 35.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.40
02054033836
27Page:
Packet Page 84 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134764 10/11/2012 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
ANGLES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 19.94
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.89
02054042872
TANK, GAS GRILL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 188.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.95
02054045284
SPRAY PAINT, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 73.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.00
02056260425
EPOXY CART
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.71
02057044346
DECK SCRUBBER, PVC CEMENT,PRIMER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.21
02057562033
HOOKS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.88
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.56
02057562127
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.74
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.74
28Page:
Packet Page 85 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134764 10/11/2012 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
02059083258
PAINT SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 51.88
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.93
02059086176
CARRY CASE, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 74.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.12
Total :689.43
134765 10/11/2012 072065 HOODSPORT'N DIVE 108 INV#108 - EDMONDS PD
AGA MAJOR OVERHAUL KITS
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 1,147.88
AGA FACE SHIELD WITH ABB
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 223.39
SOLA LIGHT 500
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 825.24
8.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 186.70
Total :2,383.21
134766 10/11/2012 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 23522 E9FB.MATERIAL TESTING.TASK ORDR NO
E9FB.Material Testing.Task Order 12-
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 4,466.12
Total :4,466.12
134767 10/11/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2157823 Copy paper - 3rd floor
Copy paper - 3rd floor
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 24.01
Copy paper - 3rd floor
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 24.00
Copy paper - 3rd floor
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 23.99
29Page:
Packet Page 86 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134767 10/11/2012 (Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 2.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 2.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 2.28
Total :78.84
134768 10/11/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2159435 COPY PAPER, AA BATTERIES,POST ITS
Copy Paper, AA batteries & 1.5x2 Post
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 210.98
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.310.00 20.04
Total :231.02
134769 10/11/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2158592 226961
WALL FILES/PENS/INK CARTRIDGE
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 562.29
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41 53.42
Total :615.71
134770 10/11/2012 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2158361 Misc. Office supplies - calendars for
Misc. Office supplies - calendars for
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 359.81
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 34.18
Misc. office supplies including hand2159958
Misc. office supplies including hand
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 45.64
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 4.34
Total :443.97
134771 10/11/2012 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 3034264 PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
30Page:
Packet Page 87 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134771 10/11/2012 (Continued)068952 INFINITY INTERNET
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00
Total :15.00
134772 10/11/2012 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 1905701005921 INV#1905701005921 -EDMONDS PD
3V CR123A BATTERIES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 71.76
9V BATTERIES - 12 PACK
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 19.69
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.68
Total :100.13
134773 10/11/2012 069264 J & K ASSOCIATES 1408 Unit 130- Hydraulic Dipstick Kit
Unit 130- Hydraulic Dipstick Kit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 77.58
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 41.67
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.33
Total :130.58
134774 10/11/2012 074221 JAMES & DEBORAH LUNDSTROM 4-14925 #30066871-327 UTILITY REFUND
#30066871-327 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 88.54
Total :88.54
134775 10/11/2012 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 562068 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,193.54
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 301.28
Total :3,494.82
134776 10/11/2012 073780 KAMINS, CHAD E9FB.Pmt 1 E9FB.PROGRESS PAYMENT 1 THRU
31Page:
Packet Page 88 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134776 10/11/2012 (Continued)073780 KAMINS, CHAD
E9FB.Progress Payment 1 thru 9/30/12
412.200.630.594.320.650.00 147,605.08
E9FB.Ret 1
412.200.000.223.400.000.00 -7,380.25
Total :140,224.83
134777 10/11/2012 074223 KEARNS, JUANITA KEARNS1003 REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 40.00
Total :40.00
134778 10/11/2012 070285 KPLU-FM IN-1120929298 RADIO PROMOTION AD 8/26 - 9/02/12
Radio promotional ad week of 8/26 -
001.000.240.513.110.440.00 890.00
Total :890.00
134779 10/11/2012 016600 KROESENS INC 19059 INV#19059 - EDMONDS PD -MANDEVILLE
JACKET L790 GLACIER
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 49.99
3/4 SLEEVE UNIFORM POLO SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 51.00
S/S UNIFORM POLO SHIRT
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 23.50
EMBROIDERY - MANDEVILLE
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 26.70
BLACK FLEECE JACKET
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 25.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.240.00 16.79
INV#19857 - EDMONDS PD -BROMAN19857
S/S UNIFORM POLO SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 47.00
EMBROIDERY - BROMAN
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 17.80
BLACK MICRO JACKET
32Page:
Packet Page 89 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134779 10/11/2012 (Continued)016600 KROESENS INC
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 25.50
PROPET SHOES
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 62.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 14.52
INV#19858 - EDMONDS PD -COLLINS19858
3/4 SLEEVE UNIFORM POLO SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 45.00
EMBROIDERY - COLLINS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 17.80
S/S UNIFORM POLO SHIRT
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 20.50
EMBROIDERY - COLLINS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 8.90
BLACK MICRO JACKET
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 45.00
PROPET SHOES
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 62.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 18.97
INV#19859 - EDMONDS PD -JOHNSON19859
3/4 SLEEVE UNIFORM POLO SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 67.50
EMBROIDERY - JOHNSON
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 26.70
BLACK MICRO FLEECE JACKET
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 22.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.240.00 11.09
Total :707.26
134780 10/11/2012 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN LAMPHERE16115 COOLING INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD
COOLING INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 90.00
33Page:
Packet Page 90 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :90.0013478010/11/2012 069083 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN
134781 10/11/2012 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 30421 Professional Services through 9/1/12.
Professional Services through 9/1/12.
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 500.00
Total :500.00
134782 10/11/2012 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 10012-114 SUPPLIES
SPRAY NOZZLE, EZ REACHER,RAKE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 50.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.83
BLOWER BAND ASSEMBLY9012-246
BLOWER BAND ASSEMBLY
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.93
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.70
Total :75.30
134783 10/11/2012 073024 LEE, ERICA MICHELLE 110609 WITNESS FEES
WITNESS FEES
001.000.230.512.540.490.00 25.00
Total :25.00
134784 10/11/2012 069634 LEXISNEXIS 1201641-20120930 INV 1201641-20120930 EDMONDS PD
MONITORING CHARGES
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 3.00
MINIMUM COMMITMENT SEPT 2012
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 5.04
Total :58.04
134785 10/11/2012 068619 LINDA SWENSON 1239 CRAZE WINTER/SPRING COVER PHOTO
34Page:
Packet Page 91 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134785 10/11/2012 (Continued)068619 LINDA SWENSON
CRAZE WINTER/SPRING 2013 COVER PHOTO
001.000.640.574.200.490.00 157.50
Total :157.50
134786 10/11/2012 074224 MALCHAM, CHERI MALCHAM1004 REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 26.00
Total :26.00
134787 10/11/2012 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 70 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 250.00
Total :250.00
134788 10/11/2012 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 38044724 123106800
FLAT WASHERS/CAP SCREWS/LOCKNUT
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 804.95
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 25.70
Total :830.65
134789 10/11/2012 071501 MIDSCI 369350 INV#369350 - EDMONDS PD
17.7 CU FT LAB REFRIGERATOR
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 698.51
Freight
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 183.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 83.75
Total :965.26
134790 10/11/2012 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 155999 Traffic Control - Propane
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 63.52
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 6.03
35Page:
Packet Page 92 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134790 10/11/2012 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
Traffic Control - Propane156057
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 27.22
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.59
Traffic Control - Propane156127
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 36.30
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.45
Traffic Control - Propane156371
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 26.87
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.55
Traffic Control - Propane156417
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 31.41
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2.98
Traffic Control - Propane156475
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 36.30
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 3.45
Total :242.67
134791 10/11/2012 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 155766 2 PERSON GENIE LIFT
GENIE LIFT
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 242.82
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 70.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 29.72
CEMETERY SUPPLIES156463
36Page:
Packet Page 93 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134791 10/11/2012 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
GATORLINE
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 27.90
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.65
GLOVES156468
GLOVES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 71.11
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.76
Total :450.96
134792 10/11/2012 074115 NEGGERS, CARLA A NEGGERS1005 WOTS KEYNOTE SPEAKER
2012 WRITE ON THE SOUND KEYNOTE SPEAKER
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 2,450.00
Total :2,450.00
134793 10/11/2012 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0483189-IN LS 7 - Filters
LS 7 - Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 39.29
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.73
Total :43.02
134794 10/11/2012 068663 NORTHERN ENERGY PROPANE 827715 Traffic Control - Propane
Traffic Control - Propane
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 120.39
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 11.44
Total :131.83
134795 10/11/2012 072339 NORTHSHORE PAVING INC 14381 Public Works - Paving for Wash Pit
Public Works - Paving for Wash Pit
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 841.25
Public Works - Paving for Wash Pit
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 841.25
37Page:
Packet Page 94 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134795 10/11/2012 (Continued)072339 NORTHSHORE PAVING INC
Public Works - Paving for Wash Pit
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 841.25
Public Works - Paving for Wash Pit
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 841.25
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 79.92
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 79.92
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 79.92
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 79.92
Total :3,684.68
134796 10/11/2012 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-537103 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:HAINES WHARF PARK
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 220.77
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-540900
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:HICKMAN PARK
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 587.88
Total :808.65
134797 10/11/2012 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 326 Planning Board Minutes on 9/26/12.
Planning Board Minutes on 9/26/12.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 528.00
Historic Preservation Commission000 00 327
Historic Preservation Commission
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 144.00
Total :672.00
134798 10/11/2012 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 531018 PW Admin Office Supplies
PW Admin Office Supplies
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 12.96
Sewer - HP Ink
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 101.21
38Page:
Packet Page 95 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134798 10/11/2012 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 1.23
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 9.62
Total :125.02
134799 10/11/2012 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 566277 LAMINATING POUCHES
LAMINATING POUCHES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 23.74
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.25
BACKREST587202
BACKREST FOR OFFICE CHAIR
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 39.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.79
PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES588121
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 76.55
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.560.310.00 7.28
LAMINATING SUPPLIES634443
LAMINATING POUCHES
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 47.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 4.52
Total :205.48
134800 10/11/2012 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER September, 2012 COURT, BLDG CODE &JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services &Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,087.40
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 22,277.89
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 144.00
39Page:
Packet Page 96 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134800 10/11/2012 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.000.237.330.000.00 69.47
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 3,803.64
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 105.34
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.000.237.250.000.00 2,114.74
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.000.237.260.000.00 394.30
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.000.237.290.000.00 58.87
Multi-Model Transportation
001.000.000.237.300.000.00 58.90
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.000.237.320.000.00 110.28
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 255.81
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.000.237.340.000.00 394.35
Total :30,874.99
134801 10/11/2012 073751 OKANOGAN COUNTRY SHERIFF OKCJ SEPT 2012 INMATE HOUSING SEPT 2012 EDMONDS
INMATE HOUSING SEPT 2012
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 3,640.00
INMATE MEDICAL SEPT 2012
001.000.410.523.600.310.00 32.00
Total :3,672.00
134802 10/11/2012 073714 OLBRECHTS & ASSOC, PLLC SEPTEMBER 2012 Hearing Examiner services for September
Hearing Examiner services for September
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 4,320.00
Total :4,320.00
134803 10/11/2012 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0060860 23700 104TH AVE W
40Page:
Packet Page 97 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134803 10/11/2012 (Continued)026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
WATER, SEWER~
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 77.05
Total :77.05
134804 10/11/2012 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00065494 Roadway/Storm - Underground Utility
Roadway/Storm - Underground Utility
111.000.653.542.310.350.00 2,155.00
Roadway/Storm - Underground Utility
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 2,155.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.350.00 204.73
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 204.72
Storm - Sweeper Spray Nozels (4)00065517
Storm - Sweeper Spray Nozels (4)
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 38.84
Freight
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 10.87
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 4.72
Total :4,773.88
134805 10/11/2012 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS PACNWFLOAT16072 SKAGIT RIVER HIKE AND FLOAT
SKAGIT RIVER HIKE AND FLOAT~
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 71.60
Total :71.60
134806 10/11/2012 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 140082 Storm - Dump Fees
Storm - Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 84.00
Storm - Dump Fees140088
Storm - Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 105.00
Storm- Dump Fees140102
Storm- Dump Fees
41Page:
Packet Page 98 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134806 10/11/2012 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 105.00
Storm Dump Fees140114
Storm Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 105.00
Total :399.00
134807 10/11/2012 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.954023031755 PAINT SUPPLIES
NEUTRAL PAINT BASE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.51
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.14
Total :24.65
134808 10/11/2012 072933 PETERSON, THOMAS PETERSON1007 WOTS FACILITY SET UP &CLEAN UP
PROVIDE FACILITY SET UP AND CLEAN UP
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 126.00
Total :126.00
134809 10/11/2012 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 2414614 FAC - Supplies
FAC - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.00
9.2% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.15
Total :61.15
134810 10/11/2012 064088 PROTECTION ONE 1988948 ALARM MONITORING ANDERSON CENTER
ALARM MONITORING FRANCES ANDERSON
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 222.42
Total :222.42
134811 10/11/2012 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ15829 FELDENKRAIS CLASS
FELDENKRAIS WEEKLY CLASS #15829
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 289.50
Total :289.50
134812 10/11/2012 030455 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL 201326 Membership Dues 7/1/12 - 6/30/13
42Page:
Packet Page 99 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134812 10/11/2012 (Continued)030455 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
Membership Dues 7/1/12 - 6/30/13
001.000.390.519.900.490.00 13,845.00
Econ Devlpmnt Dist Dues 7/1/12 - 6/30
001.000.390.519.900.490.00 1,215.00
Total :15,060.00
134813 10/11/2012 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 130319 MARKER
MARKER: ROGERSS
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 508.00
INSCRIPTION130516
SHUTTER/NICHE INSCRIPTION:SAUERLAND
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 90.00
Total :598.00
134814 10/11/2012 006841 RICOH USA INC 5023815428 Meter charges for billing period
Meter charges for billing period
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 5.42
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 0.51
Total :5.93
134815 10/11/2012 070042 RICOH USA INC 87773745 Rent on reception copier for billing
Rent on reception copier for billing
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 30.66
Total :30.66
134816 10/11/2012 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY SEPT 2012 INVOICE 09/30/12 ACCT#70014 -EDMONDS PD
#112771 7 NPC - 09/04/12
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 77.14
#111434 8 NPC - 09/24/12
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 88.16
Total :165.30
134817 10/11/2012 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 87410 E2FC.SERVICES THRU 9/29/12
E2FC.Services thru 9/29/12
43Page:
Packet Page 100 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134817 10/11/2012 (Continued)070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 10,840.06
Total :10,840.06
134818 10/11/2012 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1121961 INV#1121961 ACCT#CEDM -EDMONDS PD
DOG LICENSE RENEWAL FORMS
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 263.80
Freight
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 20.24
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.700.310.00 26.98
Total :311.02
134819 10/11/2012 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2011-0356-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVE
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVE
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 51.51
TRAFFIC LIGHT 900 PUGET DR /METER2016-9084-9
TRAFFIC LIGHT 900 PUGET DR /METER
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.64
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @2017-1178-5
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 1,429.64
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW2017-9000-3
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 52.85
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @2025-2918-6
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 2,649.74
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 4002025-2920-2
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 184.24
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @2025-7615-3
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 14,066.35
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2502025-7948-8
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 250
44Page:
Packet Page 101 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134819 10/11/2012 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 596.97
Total :19,061.94
134820 10/11/2012 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 113889885 2019-9517-2
9805 EDMONDS WAY
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 31.68
2025-7952-0117209560
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 8.10
Total :39.78
134821 10/11/2012 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-2646-0 1000 EDMONDS ST
1000 EDMONDS ST
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.64
930 9TH AVE N2022-5063-5
930 9TH AVE N
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.64
Total :61.28
134822 10/11/2012 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2012-1321 CREDITS ON INVOICE 2012-1321 EDMONDS PD
CR .5 BOOKING 8-12 - EDWARDS
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -46.35
CR 1.5 HOUSING 8-12 - EDWARDS
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -96.57
CR 2 WORK RELEASE $22 EACH
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -44.00
CR 22 WORK RELEASE $18 EACH
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -414.00
CR 16 WORK RELEASE OF $43.26 EACH
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -692.16
INV#2012-1321 - EDMONDS PD -SEPT2012-1321
SEPT BOOKINGS - 61.33 @$92.70
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 5,685.29
SEPT HOUSING - 673.33 @ $64.38
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 43,348.99
45Page:
Packet Page 102 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134822 10/11/2012 (Continued)063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
SEPT WORK RELEASE - 56 @ $43.26
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 2,422.56
Total :50,163.76
134823 10/11/2012 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE SCJAIL MED SEPT 2012 JAIL MEDICAL SEPTEMBER 2012 EDMONDS
JAIL MEDICAL - SEPTEMBER 2012
001.000.410.523.600.310.00 299.42
Total :299.42
134824 10/11/2012 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000309072 SOLID WASTE CHARGES
SOLID WASTE CHARGES~
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 862.00
Total :862.00
134825 10/11/2012 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER September 2012 Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 720.00
Total :720.00
134826 10/11/2012 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 577.94
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700103585
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST103586
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N103588
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 459.89
Total :2,267.53
134827 10/11/2012 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4204960-01 2397
UNIFORM/PALADA
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 87.68
46Page:
Packet Page 103 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :87.6813482710/11/2012 038410 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
134828 10/11/2012 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON 2012 Unclaimed 2012 UNCLAIMED PAYROLL PORTION
Check #48888 11/23/09 Randal Hills
811.000.000.111.100.000.00 0.92
Check #48982 12/18/09 IAFF FIREPAC
811.000.000.111.100.000.00 277.17
Check #49018 1/05/10 IAFF FIREPAC
811.000.000.111.100.000.00 277.17
5%Shift Differential unpaid hours from8/11/09
5%Shift Differential unpaid hours from
001.000.651.519.920.110.00 355.99
Total :911.25
134829 10/11/2012 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON 4-07675 RE: #611001708 LMO UTILITY REFUND
RE: 611001708 LMO UB Ref 4-07675
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 68.61
Total :68.61
134830 10/11/2012 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3002012802 INV#3002012802 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD
MINIMUM MONTHLY CHARGE
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 0.36
Total :10.36
134831 10/11/2012 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY S100287385.001 FAC - Elect Supplies (60 Fluor Lamps
FAC - Elect Supplies (60 Fluor Lamps
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 728.22
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 69.18
FAC - Compact Fluor Lamps (25)S100301797.001
FAC - Compact Fluor Lamps (25)
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 200.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 19.08
47Page:
Packet Page 104 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,017.3313483110/11/2012 040430 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
134832 10/11/2012 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY S100302425.001 SUPPLIES
THEM KIT
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 21.83
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.07
CEMETERY SUPPLIESS100302425.002
WALL HEATER
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 132.11
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 12.55
Total :168.56
134833 10/11/2012 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY I01795626-09262012 CIP/CFP AD FOR PB PUBLIC HEARING
CIP/CFP 2013-2018 Ad for PB Public
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 37.84
Total :37.84
134834 10/11/2012 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 09302012 NEWSPAPER ADS
City Council & Plan.Brd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,466.91
Total :1,466.91
134835 10/11/2012 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1795290 Swedish/BLD20120661 Legal Notice.
Swedish/BLD20120661 Legal Notice.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 60.20
Total :60.20
134836 10/11/2012 074222 THE MOTT REVOCABLE LIVINGTRUST 7-01725 #4201-1891727 UTILITY REFUND
#4201-1891727 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 37.16
Total :37.16
134837 10/11/2012 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 343967 FS 20 - Supplies
FS 20 - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.00
48Page:
Packet Page 105 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134837 10/11/2012 (Continued)027269 THE PART WORKS INC
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.56
Total :29.43
134838 10/11/2012 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 343658 VALVE REPAIR KIT
VALVE REPAIR KIT FOR 5871 HAWS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 94.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.98
SEAT343659
ELONGATED TOILET SEATS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 333.30
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 33.29
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 34.83
Total :504.90
134839 10/11/2012 072469 THOMAS, KIM THOMAS1006 WOTS ON SITE OPERATIONS ASSISTANCE
PROVIDE ON SITE ASSISTANCE FOR WRITE ON
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 369.00
Total :369.00
134840 10/11/2012 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 295222 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUM
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MUSEUM
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 211.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 20.08
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HALL295223
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,002.94
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 95.29
49Page:
Packet Page 106 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134840 10/11/2012 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER295224
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 46.73
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER299334
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 172.82
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 16.42
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER299335
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.06
Total :1,579.68
134841 10/11/2012 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 19214 Fleet - Com Locks
Fleet - Com Locks
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.33
Total :15.28
134842 10/11/2012 070037 TRIMAXX CONSTRUCTION INC E2DB.Pmt 8 E2DB.PROGRESS PAYMENT 8 THRU
E2DB.Progress Payment 8 thru 9/30/12
132.000.640.594.760.650.00 39,859.25
Total :39,859.25
134843 10/11/2012 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 2090116 utility locates - Sept
utility locates - Sept
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 80.23
utility locates - Sept
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 80.23
utility locates - Sept
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 82.65
Total :243.11
134844 10/11/2012 074218 VANAIRE 13577 1297
50Page:
Packet Page 107 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134844 10/11/2012 (Continued)074218 VANAIRE
MESH PAD SCRUBBER
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7,400.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 533.00
Total :7,933.00
134845 10/11/2012 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 1122279805 C/A 571242650-0001
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Bld Dept
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 186.03
Blackberry Cell Phone Service City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 56.00
iPad Cell Phone Service Council
001.000.110.511.100.420.00 393.70
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Court
001.000.230.512.500.420.00 92.42
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Planning
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 14.24
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Econ
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 74.95
Blackberry Cell Phone Service
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 276.96
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Facilities
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 90.91
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Finance
001.000.310.514.230.420.00 84.95
Blackberry Cell Phone Service HR
001.000.220.516.100.420.00 30.02
Blackberry Cell Phone Service IT
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 376.93
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Mayor'
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 84.95
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Parks Dept
001.000.640.574.100.420.00 54.93
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Police
51Page:
Packet Page 108 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134845 10/11/2012 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 861.48
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Police
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 235.40
Blackberry Air Cards Police Dept
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 952.95
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Admin
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 56.00
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW St Dept
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 43.64
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 38.00
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Water
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 37.99
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Sewer Dept
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 94.94
Blackberry Cell Phone Service WWTP
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 120.93
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 135.09
Total :4,393.41
134846 10/11/2012 074195 VOICE COACHES VOICE15933 GETTING PAID TO TALK
GETTING PAID TO TALK #15933
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 240.00
Total :240.00
134847 10/11/2012 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8051772055 80013387
LAB SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 368.52
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 49.56
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.31 39.72
Total :457.80
52Page:
Packet Page 109 of 532
10/11/2012
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
7:38:28AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
134848 10/11/2012 047605 WA ST TREASURER 3RD QTR 2012 EDMONDS FORFEITURES - 3RD QTR
3RD QTR/PROCEEDS/DRUG/CASH
104.000.000.237.100.000.00 93.70
Total :93.70
134849 10/11/2012 073137 WELCH-LANG, CAROLE LANG1006 ANDERSON CENTER MONITOR
ANDERSON CENTER BUILDING MONITOR
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 12.00
Total :12.00
134850 10/11/2012 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 5655 Development Service letterhead and
Development Service letterhead and
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 498.83
Total :498.83
134851 10/11/2012 073739 WH PACIFIC INC 37348-01 E6MA.SERVICES THRU 9/2/12
E6MA.Services thru 9/2/12
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 4,144.19
Total :4,144.19
134852 10/11/2012 074226 WOOD, LISA WOOD15315 BELLY DANCE CLASS
BELLY DANCE CLASS #15315
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 120.00
Total :120.00
Bank total :846,250.13160Vouchers for bank code :front
846,250.13Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report160
53Page:
Packet Page 110 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA
FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB
General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA
General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB
PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB
PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA
STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
STM NPDES m013 E7FG
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD
STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF
STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH
STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c336 E1FA
STM Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements c307 E9FB
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA
STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA
STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB
STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 111 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
SWR Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA
SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR BNSF Double Track Project c300 E8GC
SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD
SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA
SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB
SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA
WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB
WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA
WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA
WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA
WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE
WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA
WTR 5th Avenue Overlay Project c399 E2CC
WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB
WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA
WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC
WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK
WTR OVD Watermain Improvements c141 E3JB
WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB
WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 112 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support
WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program
FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
STM E1FA c336 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
SWR E1GA c347 Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement
WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program
WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair
WTR E2CC c399 5th Avenue Overlay Project
PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 113 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements
STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program
STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
STM E7FG m013 NPDES
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
SWR E8GC c300 BNSF Double Track Project
SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking
STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program
STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project
STM E9FB c307 Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements
SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 114 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements
SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail
General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program
STR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
STR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
STR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza
PM c282 E8MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
PM c290 E8MB Marina Beach Additional Parking
STR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program
SWR c298 E8GA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
SWR c300 E8GC BNSF Double Track Project
SWR c301 E8GD City-Wide Sewer Improvements
SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
STM c307 E9FB Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements
STR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project
PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
WTR c324 E0IA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
STM c326 E0FC Stormwater GIS Support
FAC c327 E0LA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
STR c329 E0AA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
FAC c332 E0LB Senior Center Roof Repairs
WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program
STM c336 E1FA SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM c339 E1FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program
STM c341 E1FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 115 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
SWR c347 E1GA Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement
STM c349 E1FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
STR c354 E1DA Sunset Walkway Improvements
WTR c363 E0JA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program
STR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
General c372 E1EA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
STM c374 E1FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain
STM c376 E1FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM c378 E2FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
STM c382 E2FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
WWTP c383 WWTP WWTP ReRoof Project
WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program
WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair
SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update
STR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project
WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR c399 E2CC 5th Avenue Overlay Project
STR i005 E7AC 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STM m013 E7FG NPDES
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 116 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA
STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA
WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA
STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB
WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA
STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE
SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA
WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA
WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA
STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
WTR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB
STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA
WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA
SWR BNSF Double Track Project c300 E8GC
STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB
SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD
SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 117 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA
WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK
PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM NPDES m013 E7FG
SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB
WTR OVD Watermain Improvements c141 E3JB
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB
WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD
STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD
PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA
FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB
SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA
WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB
STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB
General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA
General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA
STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF
STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH
STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c336 E1FA
STM Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements c307 E9FB
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
Revised 10/11/2012Packet Page 118 of 532
PROJECT NUMBERS
(Phase and Task Numbers)
Phases and Tasks (Engineering Division)
Phase Title
ct Construction
ds Design
pl Preliminary
sa Site Acquisition & Prep
st Study
ro Right-of-Way
Task Title
196 Traffic Engineering & Studies
197 MAIT
198 CTR
199 Engineering Plans & Services
950 Engineering Staff Time
970 Construction Management
981 Contract
990 Miscellaneous
991 Retainage
stm Engineering Staff Time-Storm
str Engineering Staff Time-Street
swr Engineering Staff Time-Sewer
wtr Engineering Staff Time-Water
prk Engineering Staff Time-Park
Packet Page 119 of 532
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 557 - 09/16/2012 to 09/30/2012
Bank: front - Union Bank
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
51736 10/05/2012 acsi ACSI 450.00 0.00
51737 10/05/2012 mebt AST TTEE 75,717.84 0.00
51738 10/05/2012 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 1,219.00 0.00
51739 10/05/2012 epoa4 EPOA-4 POLICE SUPPORT 117.00 0.00
51740 10/05/2012 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 464.17 0.00
51741 10/05/2012 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 1,625.06 0.00
51742 10/05/2012 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 3,329.05 0.00
51743 10/05/2012 cope SEIU COPE 72.00 0.00
51744 10/05/2012 seiu SEIU LOCAL 925 3,294.54 0.00
51745 10/05/2012 sdu STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 250.00 0.00
51746 10/05/2012 uw UNITED WAY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY 664.00 0.00
51747 10/05/2012 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 1,433.33 0.00
51748 10/05/2012 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 14,086.00 0.00
102,721.99 0.00
Bank: wire - FRONTIER BANK
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
1960 10/05/2012 aflac AFLAC 4,294.92 0.00
1963 10/05/2012 front FRONTIER BANK 86,124.60 0.00
1964 10/05/2012 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 208.50 0.00
90,628.02 0.00
193,350.01 0.00Grand Totals:
Page 1 of 110/4/2012
Packet Page 120 of 532
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 557 (09/16/2012 to 09/30/2012)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
-det 0.00 -82.46Salary Correction for DetREGULAR HOURS
111 16.00 0.00NO PAY LEAVEABSENT
121 622.75 22,861.25SICK LEAVESICK
122 777.25 26,965.01VACATIONVACATION
123 12.00 300.75HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY
124 109.00 3,491.53FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY
125 154.50 5,169.62COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS
129 264.00 10,650.62Police Sick Leave L & ISICK
132 8.00 386.32JURY DUTYJURY DUTY
141 20.00 686.88BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT
150 60.00 2,013.48Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS
155 93.54 3,641.36COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS
170 0.00 4,200.00COUNCIL BASE PAYREGULAR HOURS
171 76.00 950.00COUNCIL MEETING PAYREGULAR HOURS
172 52.00 650.00COUNCIL OTHER MEETINGREGULAR HOURS
173 0.00 100.00COUNCIL AGENDA PAYREGULAR HOURS
174 0.00 100.00COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAYREGULAR HOURS
190 14,610.75 517,661.49REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS
191 4.00 3,542.87FIRE PENSION PAYMENTSREGULAR HOURS
195 80.00 3,087.00ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVEREGULAR HOURS
196 78.50 3,029.12LIGHT DUTYREGULAR HOURS
215 48.00 2,209.92WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS
216 15.00 1,335.54STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS
220 228.00 12,311.82OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS
225 3.00 182.92OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS
410 0.00 64.00WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS
411 0.00 718.93SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
602 89.00 0.00ACCRUED COMPCOMP HOURS
604 126.25 0.00ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS
607 0.25 0.00Holiday Compensatory Time 1.5COMP HOURS
acc 0.00 23.10ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUS
acs 0.00 154.57ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUS
boc 0.00 78.48BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUS
10/04/2012 Page 1 of 2
Packet Page 121 of 532
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 557 (09/16/2012 to 09/30/2012)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
cpl 0.00 132.76TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUS
crt 0.00 667.88CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUS
det 0.00 92.61DETECTIVE PAYMISCELLANEOUS
det4 0.00 768.66Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUS
ed1 0.00 753.49EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAY
ed2 0.00 805.66EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAY
ed3 0.00 5,140.56EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAY
fmls 142.50 4,330.75FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICK
k9 0.00 199.14K-9 PAYMISCELLANEOUS
lg1 0.00 1,932.42LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITY PAY
lg2 0.00 1,339.20LONGEVITY PAY 4%LONGEVITY PAY
lg3 0.00 4,908.09LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAY
lg4 0.00 543.78Longevity 1%LONGEVITY
lg5 0.00 65.67Longevity 3%LONGEVITY
lg6 0.00 223.94Longevity .5%LONGEVITY
lg7 0.00 358.21Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITY
lgh 0.00 0.00Longevity HourlyLONGEVITY
mtc 0.00 185.22MOTORCYCLE PAYMISCELLANEOUS
ooc 0.00 236.795% OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS
pds 0.00 43.78Public Disclosure SpecialistMISCELLANEOUS
phy 0.00 1,694.13PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUS
prof 0.00 141.98PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SERGEANMISCELLANEOUS
sdp 0.00 262.00SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%MISCELLANEOUS
sgt 0.00 141.98ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANTMISCELLANEOUS
slw 350.11 0.00SICK LEAVE ADD BACKSICK
str 0.00 388.94Street CrimesMISCELLANEOUS
traf 0.00 291.71TRAFFICMISCELLANEOUS
Total Net Pay:$451,069.13
$652,133.47 18,040.40
10/04/2012 Page 2 of 2
Packet Page 122 of 532
AM-5189 3. D.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Shawn Hunstock Submitted By:Sarah Mager
Department:Finance
Committee: Finance Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
August 2012 Monthly Financial Report.
Recommendation
N.A. For informational purposes only.
Previous Council Action
N.A.
Narrative
The August 2012 Monthly Financial Report reflects additional changes to those shown with the July 2012
report. Committee feedback is being requested on the changes, as well as any other changes they would
like to see.
Attachments
August 2012 Monthly Financial Report
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Shawn Hunstock 10/11/2012 08:30 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 08:33 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/11/2012 08:34 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 11:10 AM
Form Started By: Sarah Mager Started On: 10/11/2012 08:17 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/11/2012
Packet Page 123 of 532
1
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
001-General Fund 5,705,633$ 3,410,974$ 3,553,694$ 2,484,282$ (2,151,939)$
004-Criminal Investigations Fund 2,500 2,500 2,500 - -
006-Emergency Financial Reserve Fund 1,927,600 1,927,600 - - (1,927,600)
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 320,656 165,244 224,533 157,262 (96,123)
010-Reserve Fund 1,338,178 1,338,576 - 392 (1,338,178)
011-Risk Management Fund - - 244,000 - 244,000
012 - Contingency Reserve Fund - - 5,281,990 - 5,281,990
113-Multimodal Transportation FD 55,859 55,859 55,859 - -
116-Building Maintenance 212,212 212,275 227,585 27,363 15,372
Total General Fund 9,562,638$ 7,113,028$ 9,590,161$ 2,669,299$ 27,523$
GENERAL
FUND
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$9.56
$7.11
$9.59
-
2
4
6
8
10
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
General
Fund
General FundGeneralFund
General Fund activity year-to-date brought an increase of $27,523 in fund balances.
The fund balance of $5.3 million in the Contingency Reserve Fund comes from
transfers of $2 million from the General Fund, $1.9 million from the Emergency
Financial Reserve Fund, and $1.3 million from the sale of fire equipment.
Several specific revenue line items are tracking ahead of budget so far through
August. These include Gas Utility Tax (70% of budget), Telephone Utility Tax and
Electric Utility Tax (both at 75% of budget), Business Licenses (93% of budget),
Franchise Fees (average of 83% of budget), Pull Tabs Tax (75% of budget),
Amusements (91% of budget), and Real Estate Excise Taxes (77% of budget).
At the end August, 67% of the year had expired. Overall, General Fund
expenditures are on track with 64% of budget spent to date. Salaries and Wages
for all departments are at 63% of budget, and Overtime is at 59% of budget.
Departments that are significantly under budget include Human Resources (53%
spent so far), Economic Development (53%), and the City Clerk’s Office (54%). No
departments are over budget.
Packet Page 124 of 532
2
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
General Fund 9,562,638$ 7,113,028$ 9,590,161$ 2,669,299$ 27,523$
Special Revenue 3,610,619 4,341,494 4,281,975 (98,188) 671,357
Debt Service 242,765 242,806 7,230 1,216 (235,535)
Governmental Funds 13,416,022$ 11,697,328$ 13,879,367$ 2,572,327$ 463,345$
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCESGOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$9.56
$7.11
$9.59
$3.61
$4.34 $4.28
$0.24 $0.24 $0.01 -
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
General
Fund
Special
Revenue
Debt
Service
Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund GroupGovernmentalFund Balances -By Fund Group
$13.42
$11.70
$13.88
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Governmental Fund Balances
-Combined
Combined governmental fund activity through August brought an increase of $463,345 to fund balances. The
General Fund was responsible for $27,523 of this increase, the special revenue funds for $671,357, and the
remaining was due to a deficit of $235,535 in the debt service funds. The second quarter brought an increase of
$2.6 million in governmental funds, while the first quarter brought a $1.7 million deficit in this fund.
Packet Page 125 of 532
3
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund 124,661$ 165,623$ 143,138$ (9,487)$ 18,477$
111 - Street Fund 392,049 284,506 195,551 (51,178) (196,498)
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 423,449 619,232 491,170 (79,919) 67,721
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 401,698 402,043 397,323 8,031 (4,374)
118 - Memorial Street Tree 17,646 17,651 17,664 5 18
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 93,895 108,523 95,036 (2,933) 1,141
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 77,577 82,964 71,403 (11,769) (6,174)
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 16,534 15,858 14,561 (1,643) (1,973)
123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 60,250 58,255 60,729 (1,806) 480
125 - Real Estate Tax 2 436,640 565,696 732,495 157,278 295,854
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 225,937 371,840 599,499 92,417 373,561
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 193,985 198,794 212,194 12,928 18,209
129 - Special Projects Fund 5,841 5,841 3,166 (1,833) (2,675)
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 85,714 79,750 61,044 1,207 (24,669)
132 - Parks Construction Fund 86,794 391,378 216,161 (205,375) 129,366
136 - Parks Trust Fund 156,611 156,655 149,833 (6,887) (6,778)
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 801,079 804,922 812,247 4,364 11,168
138 - Sister City Commission 10,261 11,964 8,763 (1,589) (1,498)
Total Special Revenue 3,610,619$ 4,341,494$ 4,281,975$ (98,188)$ 671,357$
GOVERNMENTAL
Special Revenue
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$3.61
$4.34 $4.28
-
1
2
3
4
5
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Special
Revenue
Special Revenue Funds
Activity in all special revenue funds year-to-date brought an increase of $671,357, a deficit of $98,188 during the
second quarter, and an increase of $730,875 in the first quarter. The graph below shows the total fund balances
for all nineteen special revenue funds as of December 2011, March 2012, and the current ending balance as of
August 2012.
Packet Page 126 of 532
4
48,998,030 50,368,197 51,566,595
18,605,638 17,700,923 16,910,120
65,558,827 66,013,239 66,503,495
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
411 - Combined Utility Operation
412 - Combined Utility Const/Improve
Combined Enterprise Funds (411-414)
Enterprise Funds -Fund Balances
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
411 - Combined Utility Operation 48,998,030$ 50,368,197$ 51,566,595$ 576,865$ 2,568,566$
412 - Combined Utility Const/Improve 18,605,638 17,700,923 16,910,120 (611,353) (1,695,518)
414 - Capital Improvements Reserve (2,044,841) (2,055,881) (1,973,221) (37,069) 71,621
Enterprise Funds 65,558,827$ 66,013,239$ 66,503,495$ (71,557)$ 944,668$
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$51,566,595
$16,910,120
$(1,973,221) $(2,200,000)
$7,800,000
$17,800,000
$27,800,000
$37,800,000
$47,800,000
Combined Utility Operation Combined Utility Const/Improve Capital Improvements Reserve
Enterprise Fund Balances as of August 31, 2012
Utility Fund Activity through August brought an increase of $944,668 in the Enterprise Funds. The second quarter
brought a deficit of $71,557, while the first quarter brought an increase of $454,412.
Packet Page 127 of 532
5
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
Governmental Funds 13,416,022$ 11,692,328$ 13,879,367$ 2,572,327$ 463,345$
Enterprise Funds 65,558,827 66,013,239 66,503,495 (71,557) 944,668
Internal Services Fund 6,662,893 6,718,782 6,460,563 (24,443) (202,330)
Pension Trust Fund 213,210 184,287 218,993 44,831 5,783
City-wide Total 85,850,951$ 84,608,636$ 87,062,417$ 2,521,158$ 1,211,466$
CITY-WIDE
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
$9,590,161
$143,138
$195,551
$491,170
$397,323
$17,664
$95,036
$71,403
$14,561
$60,729
$732,495
$599,499
$212,194
$3,166
$61,044
$216,161
$149,833
$812,247
$8,763
$7,179
$50
$1 $2,000,000
General Fund
Drug Enforcement Fund
Street Fund
Combined Street Const/Improve
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
Memorial Street Fund
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
Employee Parking Permit Fund
Youth Scholarship Fund
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
Real Estate Excise Tax 2
Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq
Gifts Catalog Fund
Special Projects Fund
Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
Parks Construction Fund
Parks Trust Fund
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
Sister City Commission
L.I.D. Fund Control
L.I.D. Guaranty Fund
Governmental Fund Balances as of August 31,2012
At the end of August, 67% of the year had expired. Year-to-date activity brought an increase of $1.2 million to the
City-Wide fund balance, bringing the total to $87.1 million. Of the year-to-date increase, $463,345 was generated
by governmental funds, $944,668 was generated by Enterprise (Utility) Funds, a deficit of $202,330 was
generated by Internal Service Funds, and an increase of $5,783 by the Pension Trust Fund. The second quarter
brought an increase of $2.5 million to City-Wide Funds, while the first quarter brought a deficit of $1.2 million.
Packet Page 128 of 532
6
12/31/2011 3/31/2012 8/31/2012 Q2 YTD
511 - Equipment Rental Fund 6,662,893$ 6,718,782$ 6,460,563$ (24,443)$ (202,330)$
Internal Service Funds 6,662,893$ 6,718,782$ 6,460,563$ (24,443)$ (202,330)$
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$6.66 $6.72 $6.46
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Dec 2011 March 2012 August 2012
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
Internal Service Fund Balances
Internal Service Fund activity through August brought a deficit of $202,330. The second quarter brought a deficit of
$24,443, while the first quarter brought an increase of $55,889. The purchase of new Machinery in July resulted in
a deficit of $190,211. Overall, besides this purchase, we have not seen a significant change in the Equipment
Rental Fund. We began the year with a fund balance of $6.7 million and currently at the end of August; we see an
ending fund balance of $6.5 million.
Packet Page 129 of 532
7
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 1,254,252$ 1,254,252$ 1,608,118$ 28.21%
February 3,063,163 1,808,911 3,432,053 12.04%
March 5,168,945 2,105,781 5,372,339 3.93%
April 7,722,732 2,553,787 8,516,228 10.27%
May 15,170,920 7,448,188 15,369,907 1.31%
June 16,856,021 1,685,100 17,064,191 1.23%
July 18,803,696 1,947,675 18,775,883 -0.15%
August 20,454,375 1,650,679 20,425,260 -0.14%
September 21,996,040 1,541,665 21,964,731 -0.14%
October 24,533,766 2,537,726 24,498,845 -0.14%
November 31,335,142 6,801,376 31,290,540 -0.14%
December 33,017,174 1,682,032 32,970,178 -0.14%
Real Estate Excise Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 50,516$ 50,516$ 55,795$ 10.45%
February 80,158 29,643 119,438 49.00%
March 117,689 37,531 145,824 23.91%
April 170,233 52,544 199,122 16.97%
May 219,071 48,838 255,250 16.51%
June 275,073 56,002 318,412 15.76%
July 330,084 55,011 384,310 16.43%
August 390,495 60,410 453,447 16.12%
September 447,318 56,823 519,430 16.12%
October 504,597 57,280 585,944 16.12%
November 548,998 44,400 637,502 16.12%
December 590,000 41,002 685,114 16.12%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax
-
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Real Estate Excise Tax
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 130 of 532
8
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 375,013$ 375,013$ 396,472$ 5.72%
February 850,350 475,338 880,438 3.54%
March 1,188,451 338,101 1,236,580 4.05%
April 1,538,704 350,253 1,614,832 4.95%
May 1,953,189 414,485 2,037,398 4.31%
June 2,321,894 368,705 2,436,804 4.95%
July 2,693,818 371,925 2,837,791 5.34%
August 3,130,679 436,861 3,279,895 4.77%
September 3,516,951 386,272 3,684,578 4.77%
October 3,912,817 395,866 4,099,311 4.77%
November 4,351,601 438,784 4,559,009 4.77%
December 4,724,183 372,582 4,949,349 4.77%
Gas Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 123,772$ 123,772$ 109,321$ -11.68%
February 253,656 129,883 232,788 -8.23%
March 371,883 118,227 329,885 -11.29%
April 470,918 99,035 433,268 -8.00%
May 554,498 83,580 502,369 -9.40%
June 617,198 62,700 552,855 -10.42%
July 663,083 45,884 595,099 -10.25%
August 695,629 32,546 627,290 -9.82%
September 725,807 30,179 654,504 -9.82%
October 757,941 32,134 683,481 -9.82%
November 812,573 54,632 732,746 -9.82%
December 892,381 79,808 804,714 -9.82%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Sales and Use Tax
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Gas Utility Tax
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
5,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Sales and Use Tax
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Gas Utility Tax
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 131 of 532
9
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 86,875$ 86,875$ 129,337$ 48.88%
February 208,469 121,594 222,717 6.83%
March 342,214 133,745 353,214 3.21%
April 435,440 93,226 485,917 11.59%
May 553,336 117,896 672,856 21.60%
June 648,289 94,953 792,936 22.31%
July 776,209 127,920 918,807 18.37%
August 899,335 123,126 1,039,396 15.57%
September 992,632 93,297 1,147,223 15.57%
October 1,142,349 149,717 1,320,257 15.57%
November 1,227,014 84,665 1,418,107 15.57%
December 1,390,242 163,228 1,606,756 15.57%
Electric Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 151,744$ 151,744$ 159,973$ 5.42%
February 319,668 167,924 322,487 0.88%
March 474,035 154,367 489,585 3.28%
April 631,016 156,981 638,942 1.26%
May 768,814 137,798 783,961 1.97%
June 881,589 112,775 892,229 1.21%
July 988,356 106,767 1,002,829 1.46%
August 1,080,682 92,325 1,100,703 1.85%
September 1,179,059 98,377 1,200,903 1.85%
October 1,264,304 85,245 1,287,727 1.85%
November 1,371,246 106,942 1,396,650 1.85%
December 1,473,880 102,634 1,501,186 1.85%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Telephone Utility Tax
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Electric Utility Tax
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Telephone Utility Tax
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
1,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Electric Utility Tax
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 132 of 532
10
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 3,648,786$ 3,648,786$ 2,080,142$ -42.99%
February 6,048,974 2,400,188 5,514,121 -8.84%
March 8,619,767 2,570,792 7,666,998 -11.05%
April 11,721,558 3,101,791 10,886,288 -7.13%
May 13,938,841 2,217,283 12,749,656 -8.53%
June 17,348,474 3,409,633 16,874,568 -2.73%
July 20,447,704 3,099,231 18,712,395 -8.49%
August 22,800,978 2,353,274 22,577,199 -0.98%
September 25,947,453 3,146,476 25,692,794 -0.98%
October 28,210,323 2,262,870 27,933,455 -0.98%
November 30,864,128 2,653,805 30,561,215 -0.98%
December 35,281,328 4,417,200 34,935,062 -0.98%
Non-Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 2,409,336$ 2,409,336$ 527,429$ -78.11%
February 2,706,122 296,786 2,317,066 -14.38%
March 3,381,665 675,543 2,771,982 -18.03%
April 4,422,379 1,040,714 4,360,812 -1.39%
May 4,689,535 267,156 4,563,592 -2.69%
June 6,886,270 2,196,736 6,904,530 0.27%
July 7,831,399 945,128 6,952,172 -11.23%
August 7,868,145 36,747 9,092,510 15.56%
September 8,901,853 1,033,707 10,287,073 15.56%
October 9,041,832 139,979 10,448,834 15.56%
November 9,382,718 340,886 10,842,766 15.56%
December 13,414,538 4,031,820 15,501,979 15.56%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-General Fund
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Non-Departmental
-
3,000,000
6,000,000
9,000,000
12,000,000
15,000,000
18,000,000
21,000,000
24,000,000
27,000,000
30,000,000
33,000,000
36,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Non-Departmental
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 133 of 532
11
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 19,762$ 19,762$ 18,170$ -8.06%
February 41,832 22,070 40,409 -3.40%
March 64,009 22,177 62,230 -2.78%
April 87,150 23,141 77,262 -11.35%
May 105,041 17,891 103,859 -1.13%
June 125,476 20,435 128,336 2.28%
July 149,760 24,284 149,229 -0.35%
August 172,297 22,538 169,859 -1.42%
September 191,074 18,777 188,370 -1.42%
October 219,806 28,731 216,695 -1.42%
November 240,319 20,514 236,918 -1.42%
December 269,812 29,493 265,993 -1.42%
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 21,049$ 21,049$ 20,420$ -2.99%
February 42,489$ 21,440$ 40,120 -5.58%
March 63,849$ 21,360$ 58,059 -9.07%
April 84,582$ 20,733$ 75,981 -10.17%
May 105,135$ 20,553$ 94,870 -9.76%
June 125,384$ 20,249$ 113,618 -9.38%
July 147,384$ 22,000$ 132,537 -10.07%
August 168,135$ 20,750$ 151,165 -10.09%
September 188,520$ 20,385$ 169,493$ -10.09%
October 211,220$ 22,701$ 189,903$ -10.09%
November 232,824$ 21,603$ 209,326$ -10.09%
December 253,184$ 20,360$ 227,631$ -10.09%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Council
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Office of Mayor
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Council
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Office of Mayor
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 134 of 532
12
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 22,108$ 22,108$ 15,139$ -31.52%
February 45,111 23,004 27,098 -39.93%
March 70,318 25,207 56,071 -20.26%
April 94,775 24,457 71,795 -24.25%
May 117,492 22,717 96,673 -17.72%
June 140,095 22,602 114,330 -18.39%
July 162,181 22,086 136,806 -15.65%
August 184,290 22,109 153,006 -16.98%
September 210,792 26,502 175,009 -16.98%
October 231,031 20,240 191,813 -16.98%
November 253,730 22,699 210,659 -16.98%
December 286,799 33,069 238,114 -16.98%
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 56,684$ 56,684$ 57,047$ 0.64%
February 119,103 62,420 121,057 1.64%
March 185,043 65,939 183,959 -0.59%
April 250,566 65,524 245,061 -2.20%
May 314,083 63,516 302,900 -3.56%
June 381,809 67,726 365,837 -4.18%
July 443,918 62,110 426,424 -3.94%
August 510,114 66,196 485,375 -4.85%
September 573,477 63,363 545,665 -4.85%
October 638,600 65,123 607,629 -4.85%
November 704,816 66,216 670,634 -4.85%
December 779,038 74,222 741,256 -4.85%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Human Resources
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Municipal Court
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Municipal Court
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Human Resources
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 135 of 532
13
Economic Development/Community Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 30,372$ 30,372$ 22,962$ -24.40%
February 73,754 43,382 59,724 -19.02%
March 114,246 40,492 92,678 -18.88%
April 149,965 35,719 132,111 -11.91%
May 187,341 37,376 178,589 -4.67%
June 222,700 35,358 212,324 -4.66%
July 269,288 46,588 249,576 -7.32%
August 301,418 32,130 282,359 -6.32%
September 338,442 37,024 317,042 -6.32%
October 377,797 39,355 353,909 -6.32%
November 410,485 32,688 384,529 -6.32%
December 465,810 55,325 436,356 -6.32%
City Clerk
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 50,352$ 50,352$ 38,375$ -23.79%
February 97,512 47,161 76,194 -21.86%
March 151,688 54,176 119,740 -21.06%
April 200,724 49,035 158,147 -21.21%
May 257,542 56,818 197,762 -23.21%
June 305,615 48,073 246,012 -19.50%
July 357,211 51,597 289,704 -18.90%
August 408,044 50,833 328,124 -19.59%
September 458,834 50,790 368,966 -19.59%
October 503,062 44,229 404,532 -19.59%
November 553,417 50,355 445,025 -19.59%
December 609,840 56,423 490,396 -19.59%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Economic Development/Community Services
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Clerk
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Economic Development/Community Services
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Clerk
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 136 of 532
14
Information Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 46,319$ 46,319$ 45,804$ -1.11%
February 107,710 61,392 94,222 -12.52%
March 152,083 44,373 152,829 0.49%
April 201,916 49,832 200,427 -0.74%
May 248,762 46,847 259,869 4.46%
June 299,283 50,521 316,292 5.68%
July 346,978 47,695 350,853 1.12%
August 409,564 62,586 389,607 -4.87%
September 459,114 49,549 436,742 -4.87%
October 512,043 52,929 487,091 -4.87%
November 561,496 49,453 534,135 -4.87%
December 657,841 96,345 625,785 -4.87%
Finance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 73,408$ 73,408$ 72,999$ -0.56%
February 136,996 63,588 140,691 2.70%
March 198,836 61,841 200,031 0.60%
April 257,292 58,456 256,611 -0.26%
May 315,263 57,970 312,742 -0.80%
June 381,627 66,364 369,308 -3.23%
July 441,290 59,663 426,648 -3.32%
August 495,104 53,815 483,434 -2.36%
September 555,551 60,447 542,455 -2.36%
October 621,970 66,419 607,309 -2.36%
November 687,980 66,010 671,764 -2.36%
December 754,734 66,754 736,944 -2.36%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Information Services
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Finance
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Information Services
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Finance
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 137 of 532
15
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 41,250$ 41,250$ 32,000$ -22.42%
February 82,500 41,250 72,417 -12.22%
March 123,750 41,250 125,330 1.28%
April 165,000 41,250 170,361 3.25%
May 206,250 41,250 192,778 -6.53%
June 247,500 41,250 234,108 -5.41%
July 288,750 41,250 286,492 -0.78%
August 330,000 41,250 313,126 -5.11%
September 371,250 41,250 352,267 -5.11%
October 412,500 41,250 391,408 -5.11%
November 453,750 41,250 430,549 -5.11%
December 495,000 41,250 469,690 -5.11%
Police
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 755,785$ 755,785$ 649,122$ -14.11%
February 1,479,570 723,784 1,338,091 -9.56%
March 2,251,474 771,905 2,037,833 -9.49%
April 2,965,978 714,504 2,722,871 -8.20%
May 3,657,308 691,330 3,380,135 -7.58%
June 4,467,277 809,969 4,149,872 -7.11%
July 5,203,139 735,862 4,842,275 -6.94%
August 5,920,175 717,036 5,532,985 -6.54%
September 6,700,331 780,155 6,262,117 -6.54%
October 7,422,067 721,736 6,936,651 -6.54%
November 8,377,803 955,736 7,829,880 -6.54%
December 9,165,244 787,441 8,565,821 -6.54%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Attorney
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Police
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Police
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Attorney
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 138 of 532
16
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 130,080$ 130,080$ 119,611$ -8.05%
February 260,534 130,454 256,302 -1.62%
March 408,125 147,591 387,213 -5.12%
April 543,094 134,968 516,641 -4.87%
May 680,281 137,188 650,915 -4.32%
June 819,050 138,769 774,015 -5.50%
July 952,449 133,399 906,199 -4.86%
August 1,092,073 139,624 1,033,577 -5.36%
September 1,229,320 137,247 1,163,473 -5.36%
October 1,375,997 146,677 1,302,294 -5.36%
November 1,509,812 133,814 1,428,940 -5.36%
December 1,658,272 148,460 1,569,449 -5.36%
Parks & Recreation
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 225,510$ 225,510$ 221,141$ -1.94%
February 471,071 245,561 441,578 -6.26%
March 736,610 265,539 681,137 -7.53%
April 991,189 254,579 928,272 -6.35%
May 1,256,082 264,893 1,201,609 -4.34%
June 1,582,719 326,637 1,503,266 -5.02%
July 1,980,455 397,735 1,877,276 -5.21%
August 2,384,822 404,367 2,241,823 -6.00%
September 2,699,757 314,936 2,537,874 -6.00%
October 2,946,685 246,927 2,769,995 -6.00%
November 3,185,327 238,643 2,994,328 -6.00%
December 3,506,852 321,525 3,296,574 -6.00%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Development Services
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Parks & Recreation
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
1,800,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Development Services
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Parks & Recreation
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 139 of 532
17
Public Works
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 27,382$ 27,382$ 23,781$ -13.15%
February 50,599 23,217 47,443 -6.24%
March 74,354 23,755 70,857 -4.70%
April 97,129 22,775 95,079 -2.11%
May 119,986 22,856 119,904 -0.07%
June 143,545 23,559 143,089 -0.32%
July 175,267 31,722 166,690 -4.89%
August 198,164 22,897 191,557 -3.33%
September 221,614 23,450 214,225 -3.33%
October 244,229 22,616 236,086 -3.33%
November 267,862 23,633 258,931 -3.33%
December 294,110 26,248 284,304 -3.33%
Facilities Maintenance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 102,793$ 102,793$ 107,234$ 4.32%
February 220,909 118,116 223,733 1.28%
March 340,858 119,950 337,372 -1.02%
April 481,844 140,985 438,882 -8.92%
May 553,750 71,907 549,148 -0.83%
June 673,162 119,412 646,963 -3.89%
July 779,482 106,320 759,794 -2.53%
August 879,994 100,512 856,140 -2.71%
September 995,315 115,321 968,334 -2.71%
October 1,103,341 108,026 1,073,432 -2.71%
November 1,213,261 109,920 1,180,373 -2.71%
December 1,351,548 138,287 1,314,911 -2.71%
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Public Works
2012
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Facilities Maintenance
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Public Works
Actuals/Trend Budget
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Facilities Maintenance
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 140 of 532
18
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 108,801$ 108,801$ 108,908$ 0.10%
February 217,665 108,865 217,975 0.14%
March 326,749 109,084 329,676 0.90%
April 443,098 116,349 435,974 -1.61%
May 551,007 107,909 544,312 -1.22%
June 658,262 107,255 652,666 -0.85%
July 769,311 111,049 759,721 -1.25%
August 879,506 110,195 872,553 -0.79%
September 992,929 113,423 985,079 -0.79%
October 1,104,742 111,813 1,096,008 -0.79%
November 1,212,341 107,599 1,202,756 -0.79%
December 1,318,706 106,365 1,308,280 -0.79%
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Engineering
2012
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Engineering
Actuals/Trend Budget
Packet Page 141 of 532
19
Fund
No.Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Revenues Variance % Received
001 GENERAL FUND 33,017,174$ 20,425,260$ (12,591,914)$ 62%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 600,550 300,242 (300,308) 50%
010 RESERVE FUND 2,200 1,189 (1,011) 54%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 244,000 244,000 - 100%
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 5,282,000 5,281,990 (10) 100%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 28,200 46,063 17,863 163%
111 STREET FUND 1,313,650 879,754 (433,896) 67%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,840,102 828,845 (2,011,257) 29%
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD.- - - 0%
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56,860 28,528 (28,332) 50%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 58,325 21,842 (36,483) 37%
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 28 18 (10) 65%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 51,950 36,504 (15,446) 70%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 20,140 6,868 (13,272) 34%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 2,525 1,343 (1,182) 53%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 19,000 8,621 (10,379) 45%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 770,850 515,088 (255,762) 67%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 590,800 453,838 (136,962) 77%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 10,759 21,632 10,873 201%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 482,004 - (482,004) 0%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 119,850 93,221 (26,629) 78%
131 FIRE DONATIONS - - - 0%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,289,414 463,253 (826,161) 36%
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 177 152 (25) 86%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 14,600 11,168 (3,432) 76%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 5,230 2,006 (3,224) 38%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 46,700 8,310 (38,390) 18%
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 151,725 106,154 (45,571) 70%
234 LIMITED TAX G.O. BOND FUND,478,573 136,786 (341,787) 29%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 15,456,920 10,601,778 (4,855,142) 69%
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 7,888,400 92,967 (7,795,433) 1%
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,583,389 542,456 (1,040,933) 34%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,076,456 718,535 (357,921) 67%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 94,423 68,893 (25,530) 73%
631 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 600,000 432,253 (167,747) 72%
74,196,974$ 42,379,561$ 116,576,535$ 57%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Packet Page 142 of 532
20
Fund
No.Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Spent
001 GENERAL FUND 35,281,328$ 22,577,199$ (12,704,129)$ 64%
006 EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE 1,927,600 1,927,600 (0) 100%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 619,811 396,365 (223,446) 64%
010 RESERVE FUND 1,339,400 1,339,367 (33) 100%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 80,233 27,586 (52,647) 34%
111 STREET FUND 1,625,148 1,076,252 (548,896) 66%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2,940,666 761,124 (2,179,542) 26%
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD.- - - 0%
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 245,000 13,156 (231,844) 5%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 134,550 26,217 (108,333) 19%
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - - - 0%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 56,500 35,364 (21,136) 63%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,086 13,041 (13,045) 50%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 4,000 3,316 (684) 83%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 19,000 8,142 (10,858) 43%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,055,000 219,234 (835,766) 21%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 697,717 80,277 (617,440) 12%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 12,275 3,423 (8,852) 28%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 483,500 2,675 (480,825) 1%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 172,005 117,891 (54,114) 69%
131 FIRE DONATIONS - - - 0%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,376,200 333,886 (1,042,314) 24%
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 6,930 6,930 - 100%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD - - - 0%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 4,600 3,504 (1,096) 76%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 151,500 106,000 (45,500) 70%
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 244,000 244,000 - 100%
234 LIMITED TAX G.O. BOND FUND,478,573 136,786 (341,787) 29%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 15,370,401 8,033,212 (7,337,189) 52%
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 11,299,679 1,788,486 (9,511,193) 16%
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE 1,571,515 470,835 (1,100,680) 30%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,321,334 920,866 (400,468) 70%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 123,515 63,110 (60,405) 51%
631 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 600,000 432,253 (167,747) 72%
79,268,066$ 41,168,095$ (38,099,971)$ 52%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Packet Page 143 of 532
21
Fund
No.Title
1/1/2012
Beg. Balance
2012
Revenues
2012
Expenditures Difference
8/31/2012
End. Balance
001 GENERAL FUND 5,705,633$ 20,425,260$ 22,577,199$ (2,151,939)$ 3,553,694$
004 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS FUND 2,500 - - - 2,500
006 EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RESERVE FUND 1,927,600 - 1,927,600 (1,927,600) -
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 320,656 300,242 396,365 (96,123) 224,533
010 RESERVE FUND 1,338,178 1,189 1,339,367 (1,338,178) -
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - 244,000 - 244,000 244,000
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND - 5,281,990 - 5,281,990 5,281,990
113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD.55,859 - - - 55,859
116 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 212,212 28,528 13,156 15,372 227,585
TOTAL GENERAL FUND PER CAFR 9,562,638 26,281,210 26,253,686 27,523 9,590,161
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 124,661 46,063 27,586 18,477 143,138
111 STREET FUND 392,049 879,754 1,076,252 (196,498) 195,551
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 423,449 828,845 761,124 67,721 491,170
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 401,698 21,842 26,217 (4,374) 397,323
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 17,646 18 - 18 17,664
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 93,895 36,504 35,364 1,141 95,036
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 77,577 6,868 13,041 (6,174) 71,403
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 16,534 1,343 3,316 (1,973) 14,561
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 60,250 8,621 8,142 480 60,729
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 436,640 515,088 219,234 295,854 732,495
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ 225,937 453,838 80,277 373,561 599,499
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 193,985 21,632 3,423 18,209 212,194
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 5,841 - 2,675 (2,675) 3,166
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 85,714 93,221 117,891 (24,669) 61,044
131 FIRE DONATIONS - - - - -
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 86,794 463,253 333,886 129,366 216,161
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 156,611 152 6,930 (6,778) 149,833
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 801,079 11,168 - 11,168 812,247
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 10,261 2,006 3,504 (1,498) 8,763
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 104,869 8,310 106,000 (97,690) 7,179
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 137,896 106,154 244,000 (137,846) 50
234 LIMITED TAX G.O. BOND FUND,1 136,786 136,786 (0) 0
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 48,998,030 10,601,778 8,033,212 2,568,566 51,566,595
412 COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE 18,605,638 92,967 1,788,486 (1,695,518) 16,910,120
414 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE (2,044,841) 542,456 470,835 71,621 (1,973,221)
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 6,662,893 718,535 920,866 (202,330) 6,460,563
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 213,210 68,893 63,110 5,783 218,993
631 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 432,253 432,253 - -
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 85,850,951$ 42,379,561$ 41,168,095$ 1,211,466$ 87,062,417$
CITY OF EDMONDS
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE - SUMMARY
Packet Page 144 of 532
22
This page is intentionally left blank.
Packet Page 145 of 532
23
Page 1 of 3
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Revenues Variance % Received
TAXES:
REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 9,629,986$ 5,090,574$ (4,539,412)$ 53%
EMS PROPERTY TAX 2,908,944 1,580,324 (1,328,620) 54%
VOTED PROPERTY TAX 895,640 500,501 (395,139) 56%
LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 4,724,183 3,279,895 (1,444,288) 69%
NATURAL GAS USE TAX 13,244 5,739 (7,505) 43%
1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 514,898 347,282 (167,616) 67%
GAS UTILITY TAX 892,381 627,290 (265,091) 70%
T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 750,682 440,019 (310,663) 59%
TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,390,242 1,039,396 (350,846) 75%
ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,473,880 1,100,703 (373,177) 75%
SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 294,601 188,064 (106,537) 64%
WATER UTILITY TAX 824,935 534,742 (290,193) 65%
SEWER UTILITY TAX 470,000 311,413 (158,587) 66%
STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 254,061 192,656 (61,405) 76%
LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 221,162 156,162 (65,000) 71%
PULLTABS TAX 60,257 45,139 (15,118) 75%
25,319,096 15,439,900 (9,879,196) 61%
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
FIRE PERMITS-SPECIAL USE 5,000 5,353 353 107%
PROF AND OCC LICENSE-TAXI 1,000 510 (490) 51%
AMUSEMENTS 6,000 5,475 (525) 91%
BUS. LICENCE PERMIT PENALTY 5,000 3,970 (1,030) 79%
GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 105,245 98,294 (6,952) 93%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 588,008 470,088 (117,920) 80%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER 106,930 68,515 (38,415) 64%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-BLACKROCK 6,901 7,332 431 106%
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 212,292 175,322 (36,970) 83%
DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 21,000 13,005 (7,995) 62%
NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 38,885 24,250 (14,635) 62%
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 10,000 9,308 (692) 93%
BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 420,000 227,961 (192,040) 54%
ANIMAL LICENSES 11,000 7,476 (3,524) 68%
STREET AND CURB PERMIT 42,000 19,052 (22,948) 45%
OTR NON-BUS LIC/PERMITS 7,000 7,047 47 101%
DIVE PARK PERMIT FEE - - - 0%
1,586,261 1,142,957 (443,304) 72%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - Bullet Proof Vest 3,969 - (3,969) 0%
EECBG Grant - - - 0%
WA ASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT - - - 0%
TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 10,000 2,084 (7,916) 21%
HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 6,000 888 (5,112) 15%
WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT - - - 0%
Puget Drive Walkway HLP-PB07(009)- - - 0%
SMART COMMUTER PROJECT GRANT - - - 0%
PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 183,348 - (183,348) 0%
JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION-STATE 13,000 6,224 (6,776) 48%
MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 9,100 6,672 (2,428) 73%
CRIMINAL JUSTICE - SPECIAL PROGRAMS 33,827 25,116 (8,711) 74%
DUI - CITIES 9,500 5,628 (3,872) 59%
LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 200,666 146,591 (54,075) 73%
LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 310,835 216,740 (94,095) 70%
SHARED COURT COSTS 6,300 1,500 (4,800) 24%
MUNICIPAL COURT AGREEMENT W/LYNNWOOD 1,050 750 (300) 71%
FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 55,080 43,622 (11,458) 79%
POLICE FBI CONTRACTS - - - 0%
DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 10,760 7,174 (3,586) 67%
OCDETF OVERTIME - 1,226 1,226 0%
CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.11,500 4,041 (7,459) 35%
WOODWAY - LAW PROTECTION 10,000 11,723 1,723 117%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE-SSCCFH 69,300 34,650 (34,650) 50%
SNOCOM FIBER OPTIC SERVICE INTERLOCAL - 4,800 4,800 0%
SNO-ISLE 69,418 41,718 (27,700) 60%
1,013,653 561,147 (452,506) 55%
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 146 of 532
24
Page 2 of 3
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Revenues Variance % Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 1,050 868 (183) 83%
COURT RECORD SERVICES 100 - (100) 0%
D/M COURT REC SER 950 99 (851) 10%
SALE MAPS & BOOKS - 50 50 0%
MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 150 106 (44) 71%
PHOTOCOPIES 4,000 2,224 (1,776) 56%
POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 5,000 2,985 (2,015) 60%
ASSESSMENT SEARCH - 5 5 0%
PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 10,500 7,875 (2,625) 75%
POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 26,000 26,779 779 103%
DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES - 369 369 0%
ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 68,300 38,317 (29,983) 56%
ELECTRONIC MONITORING 150 - (150) 0%
ELECTRONIC MONITOR DUI 700 82 (618) 12%
BOOKING FEES 6,300 3,194 (3,106) 51%
FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 6,060 3,300 (2,760) 54%
EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 21,210 12,346 (8,864) 58%
DUI EMERGENCY AID 200 33 (167) 17%
EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 848,500 490,901 (357,599) 58%
POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 300 281 (20) 94%
CRIM CNV FEE DUI 700 450 (250) 64%
CRIM CONV FEE CT 5,900 2,879 (3,021) 49%
CRIM CONV FEE CN 2,100 1,126 (974) 54%
POLICE TRAINING CLASSES - - - 0%
ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 102,010 67,350 (34,660) 66%
FIBER SERVICES - 22,579 22,579 0%
ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 4,000 4,775 775 119%
FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS - 182 182 0%
ANNUAL VEHICLE FEE (TBD)- - - 0%
ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 55,000 25,652 (29,348) 47%
FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 3,300 943 (2,358) 29%
PLAN CHECKING FEES 235,000 153,183 (81,818) 65%
PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 4,500 326 (4,174) 7%
S.E.P.A. REVIEW 6,000 1,940 (4,060) 32%
CRITICAL AREA STUDY 15,000 10,075 (4,925) 67%
SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES 52,471 57,312 4,841 109%
LOCKER FEES 300 303 3 101%
SWIM CLASS FEES 45,520 28,625 (16,895) 63%
PROGRAM FEES 800,000 558,858 (241,142) 70%
TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 120,000 105,568 (14,432) 88%
SWIM TEAM / DIVE TEAM 31,150 30,019 (1,132) 96%
BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 620 770 150 124%
INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT-CONTRACT SVCS 1,582,061 969,299 (612,762) 61%
MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES - - - 0%
4,065,102 2,632,026 (1,433,076) 65%
FINES AND FORFEITURES:
PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 10,500 6,456 (4,044) 61%
TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 51,472 19,286 (32,186) 37%
NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 285,000 167,613 (117,387) 59%
CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)15,000 12,259 (2,741) 82%
SPEEDING DOUBLE - 38 38 0%
NON-TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES - 900 900 0%
OTHER INFRACTIONS '04 1,250 323 (927) 26%
PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 33,000 24,170 (8,830) 73%
PR - HANDICAPPED 800 - (800) 0%
PARKING INFRACTION LOC 600 40 (560) 7%
PARK / INDDISZONE 600 2,063 1,463 344%
DWI PENALTIES 9,500 5,641 (3,860) 59%
DUI - DP ACCT - 972 972 0%
OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN 50 291 241 582%
CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 40,000 21,503 (18,497) 54%
OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 600 241 (359) 40%
OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 11,500 10,309 (1,191) 90%
COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 950 795 (155) 84%
CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 120,000 71,227 (48,773) 59%
JURY DEMAND COST 100 - (100) 0%
PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 37,000 20,480 (16,520) 55%
COURT INTERPRETER COST 300 142 (158) 47%
MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 1,050 1,200 150 114%
619,272 365,951 (253,321) 59%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
Packet Page 147 of 532
25
Page 3 of 3
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Revenues Variance % Received
MISCELLANEOUS:
INVESTMENT INTEREST - 4,997 4,997 0%
INVESTMENT SERVICE FEES 9,800 - (9,800) 0%
INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 2,000 1,258 (742) 63%
INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 3,150 3,847 697 122%
PARKING 10,000 7,447 (2,553) 74%
SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 140,000 104,555 (35,445) 75%
GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 7,800 3,487 (4,313) 45%
BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 1,000 3,145 2,145 315%
LEASES LONG-TERM 173,465 107,567 (65,898) 62%
VENDING MACHINE CONCESSION 4,700 4,638 (62) 99%
OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 10,078 5,685 (4,393) 56%
PARKS DONATIONS 8,456 7,742 (714) 92%
BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 1,500 1,400 (100) 93%
SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 200 1,080 880 540%
SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 4,000 930 (3,070) 23%
OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 200 - (200) 0%
POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 100 150 50 150%
CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES (200) 35 235 0%
OTHER MISC REVENUES 3,000 5,133 2,133 171%
SMALL OVERPAYMENT - 74 74 0%
NSF FEES - PARKS & REC - 150 150 0%
NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 525 456 (69) 87%
NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT - 30 30 0%
PLANNING SIGN REVENUE 2,000 - (2,000) 0%
381,774 263,807 (117,967) 69%
TRANSFERS-IN:
INSURANCE RECOVERIES - - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER-IN - - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER - In (From 121)25,086 19,473 (5,613) 78%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (From 136)6,930 - (6,930) 0%
32,016 19,473 (12,543) 61%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 33,017,174$ 20,425,260$ (12,591,914)$ 62%
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 148 of 532
26
This page is intentionally left blank.
Packet Page 149 of 532
27
Page 1 of 5
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES:
SALARIES AND WAGES 12,400,240$ 7,854,964$ (4,545,276)$ 63%
OVERTIME 458,540 270,543 (187,997) 59%
HOLIDAY BUY BACK 179,687 2,526 (177,161) 1%
BENEFITS 4,244,174 2,746,435 (1,497,739) 65%
UNIFORMS 63,880 38,991 (24,889) 61%
SUPPLIES 435,011 237,676 (197,335) 55%
FUEL CONSUMED 700 - (700) 0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 133,012 100,839 (32,173) 76%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,852,841 1,014,587 (838,254) 55%
COMMUNICATIONS 210,037 116,779 (93,258) 56%
TRAVEL 51,060 14,088 (36,972) 28%
ADVERTISING 71,667 23,669 (47,998) 33%
RENTAL/LEASE 139,281 88,416 (50,865) 63%
INSURANCE 444,962 420,109 (24,853) 94%
UTILITIES 454,500 281,808 (172,692) 62%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 331,397 158,275 (173,122) 48%
MISCELLANEOUS 327,242 194,296 (132,946) 59%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 8,218,704 5,889,794 (2,328,910) 72%
ECA CONTINGENCY RESERVE 250,000 80,635 (169,365) 32%
EXCISE TAXES 5,200 4,319 (881) 83%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 009,012,116,117,125,617)2,914,623 2,434,926 (479,697) 84%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 17,144 - (17,144) 0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 1,084,062 - (1,084,062) 0%
CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 63,380 63,380 (0) 100%
OTHER DEBT - - - 0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 296,838 149,706 (147,132) 50%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS 5,000 1,125 (3,875) 23%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - - - 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 197,900 101,638 (96,262) 51%
INTERFUND FUEL - 55 55 0%
INTERFUND SUPPLIES - - - 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 430,246 286,840 (143,406) 67%
INTERFUND REPAIRS - 780 780 0%
35,281,328$ 22,577,199$ (12,704,129)$ 64%
EMERGENCY/FINANCIAL RESERVE
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 012)1,927,600$ 1,927,600$ (0)$ 100%
1,927,600$ 1,927,600$ (0)$ 100%
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE:
BENEFITS 462,886$ 287,102$ (175,784)$ 62%
In-Home LTC Claims 140,425 101,827 (38,598) 73%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,500 7,186 (9,315) 44%
MISCELLANEOUS - 250 250 0%
619,811$ 396,365$ (223,446)$ 64%
RESERVE FUND
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 012)1,339,400$ 1,339,367$ (33)$ 100%
1,339,400$ 1,339,367$ (33)$ 100%
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND:
SUPPLIES 200$ -$ (200)$ 0%
FUEL CONSUMED 2,000 1,453 (547) 73%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 - (5,000) 0%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,233 1,415 (818) 63%
REPAIR/MAINT 800 - (800) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 5,000 (15,000) 25%
INTERGOVTL SVC 50,000 19,719 (30,281) 39%
80,233$ 27,586$ (52,647)$ 34%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 150 of 532
28
Page 2 of 5
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
STREET FUND:
SALARIES AND WAGES 474,924$ 359,105$ (115,819)$ 76%
OVERTIME 18,400 22,540 4,140 123%
BENEFITS 191,707 158,789 (32,918) 83%
UNIFORMS 7,000 4,730 (2,270) 68%
SUPPLIES 242,500 109,960 (132,540) 45%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 24,000 11,919 (12,081) 50%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,700 19,396 (13,304) 59%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 2,343 (657) 78%
TRAVEL 1,000 60 (940) 6%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,500 4,188 2,688 279%
INSURANCE 93,719 93,305 (414) 100%
UTILITIES 261,100 146,573 (114,527) 56%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 25,500 5,073 (20,427) 20%
MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 6,793 793 113%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 6,000 1,080 (4,920) 18%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 38,954 - (38,954) 0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 6,200 3,100 (3,100) 50%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - - - 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 190,944 127,296 (63,648) 67%
1,625,148$ 1,076,252$ (548,896)$ 66%
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 846,180$ 560,436$ (285,744)$ 66%
INTERFUND TRANSFER OUT (to 112, 132)53,497 41,694 (11,803) 78%
LAND 231,022 - (231,022) 0%
CONST SURFACE CONST PROJECTS 1,596,538 1,700 (1,594,838) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,202 72,201 (1) 100%
INTEREST ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 4,841 4,840 (1) 100%
INTERFUND SERVICES 136,386 80,252 (56,134) 59%
2,940,666$ 761,124$ (2,179,542)$ 26%
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD:
PROFESSIONAL SVC -$ -$ -$ 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER - - - 0%
-$ -$ -$ 0%
BUILDING MAINTENANCE:
SUPPLIES 10,000$ -$ (10,000)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40,000 8,425 (31,575) 21%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 195,000 4,731 (190,269) 2%
MISCELLANEOUS - - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER - - - 0%
245,000$ 13,156$ (231,844)$ 5%
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND:
SUPPLIES 4,200$ 561$ (3,639)$ 13%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 523 (477) 52%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110,500 18,857 (91,643) 17%
TRAVEL 50 10 (40) 20%
ADVERTISING 4,000 4,000 - 100%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - (300) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 10,500 2,266 (8,234) 22%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 117.300)3,000 - (3,000) 0%
134,550$ 26,217$ (108,333)$ 19%
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,000$ 8,554$ (1,447)$ 86%
ADVERTISING 35,000 23,554 (11,446) 67%
MISCELLANEOUS 2,500 1,257 (1,243) 50%
TRANSFER TO FUND 117 4,000 2,000 (2,000) 50%
TRANSFER TO FUND 132 5,000 - (5,000) 0%
56,500$ 35,364$ (21,136)$ 63%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Packet Page 151 of 532
29
Page 3 of 5
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND:
SUPPLIES 1,000$ 498$ (502)$ 50%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 001)25,086 12,543 (12,543) 50%
26,086$ 13,041$ (13,045)$ 50%
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND:
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000$ 3,316$ (684)$ 83%
4,000$ 3,316$ (684)$ 83%
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS:
PROFESSIONAL SVC 10,500$ 1,283$ (9,217)$ 12%
ADVERTISING 4,500 3,830 (670) 85%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 3,029 (971) 76%
19,000$ 8,142$ (10,858)$ 43%
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2:
SUPPLIES 36,000$ 41,070$ 5,070$ 114%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 617,000 76,416 (540,584) 12%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 100,000 1,544 (98,456) 2%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 117,132)199,000 - (199,000) 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 103,000 100,203 (2,797) 97%
INTERFUND SERVICES - - - 0%
1,055,000$ 219,234$ (835,766)$ 21%
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ:
MISCELLANEOUS -$ -$ -$ 0%
TRANSFER TO FUND 234 68,080 16,540 (51,540) 24%
1998 REF BOND PRINCIPAL 502,163 - (502,163) 0%
2001 BONDS, B - INTEREST 127,474 63,737 (63,737) 50%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - - - 0%
697,717$ 80,277$ (617,440)$ 12%
GIFTS CATALOG FUND:
SUPPLIES 6,275$ 1,443$ (4,832)$ 23%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000 1,980 (2,020) 50%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 132)2,000 - (2,000) 0%
12,275$ 3,423$ (8,852)$ 28%
SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 83,500$ 1,833$ (81,667)$ 2%
CONSTRUCTION 400,000 - (400,000) 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES - 841 841 0%
483,500$ 2,675$ (480,825)$ 1%
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT:
SALARIES AND WAGES 71,107$ 45,025$ (26,082)$ 63%
OVERTIME 3,500 1,956 (1,544) 56%
BENEFITS 32,926 21,359 (11,567) 65%
UNIFORMS 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
SUPPLIES 7,000 2,704 (4,296) 39%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 20,000 17,505 (2,495) 88%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 200 (800) 20%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,412 815 (597) 58%
TRAVEL 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
ADVERTISING 3,000 1,456 (1,544) 49%
UTILITIES 3,800 2,130 (1,670) 56%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 - (500) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 2,564 1,564 256%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 17,500 17,336 (164) 99%
INTERFUND SERVICES - - - 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 7,260 4,840 (2,420) 67%
172,005$ 117,891$ (54,114)$ 69%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Packet Page 152 of 532
30
Page 4 of 5
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND:
SUPPLIES -$ 73,583$ 73,583$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 63,000 52,487 (10,513) 83%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,303,200 188,540 (1,114,660) 14%
INTERFUND SERVICES 10,000 19,276 9,276 193%
1,376,200$ 333,886$ (1,042,314)$ 24%
PARKS TRUST FUND:
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 001)6,930$ 6,930$ -$ 100%
6,930$ 6,930$ -$ 100%
SISTER CITY COMMISSION:
SUPPLIES 500$ 1,242$ 742$ 248%
STUDENT TRIP 2,600 - (2,600) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 1,500 2,262 762 151%
4,600$ 3,504$ (1,096)$ 76%
LID FUND CONTROL
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 213)151,500$ 106,000$ (45,500)$ 70%
151,500$ 106,000$ (45,500)$ 70%
LID GUARANTY FUND
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 011)244,000$ 244,000$ -$ 100%
244,000$ 244,000$ -$ 100%
LIMITED TAX G.O. BOND FUND:
2002 BOND PRINCIPAL 205,000$ -$ (205,000)$ 0%
2002 BOND INTEREST 273,573 136,786 (136,787) 50%
478,573$ 136,786$ (341,787)$ 29%
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION:
SALARIES AND WAGES 2,791,123$ 1,783,663$ (1,007,460)$ 64%
OVERTIME 117,180 80,210 (36,970) 68%
BENEFITS 1,113,707 744,679 (369,028) 67%
UNIFORMS 28,650 15,554 (13,096) 54%
SUPPLIES 675,015 425,572 (249,443) 63%
FUEL CONSUMED 150,723 106,346 (44,377) 71%
WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,410,000 775,116 (634,884) 55%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 143,000 69,680 (73,320) 49%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 25,500 1,859 (23,641) 7%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 228,808 118,028 (110,780) 52%
COMMUNICATIONS 72,200 42,518 (29,682) 59%
TRAVEL 18,600 158 (18,442) 1%
ADVERTISING 3,560 1,177 (2,383) 33%
RENTAL/LEASE 16,300 10,690 (5,610) 66%
INSURANCE 288,211 242,229 (45,982) 84%
UTILITIES 999,853 516,626 (483,227) 52%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 131,930 81,581 (50,349) 62%
MISCELLANEOUS 592,880 413,336 (179,544) 70%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 667,900 157,716 (510,184) 24%
INTERFUND TAXES 1,548,996 1,038,811 (510,185) 67%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 412,414)1,852,811 197,859 (1,654,952) 11%
LAND - - - 0%
BUILDINGS - - - 0%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - 0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 111,862 - (111,862) 0%
REVENUE BOND PRINCIPAL 445,499 - (445,499) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 180,398 181,966 1,568 101%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 496,987 238,122 (258,865) 48%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS 33,104 2,759 (30,345) 8%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 272 272 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 818,454 515,256 (303,198) 63%
INTERFUND RENTAL 407,150 271,432 (135,718) 67%
INTERFUND REPAIRS - - - 0%
15,370,401$ 8,033,212$ (7,337,189)$ 52%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 153 of 532
31
Page 5 of 5
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
COMBINED UTILITY CONST/IMPROVE:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,814,861$ 411,500$ (1,403,361)$ 23%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 112,117,132,412.300)808,111 - (808,111) 0%
LAND 3,500 - (3,500) 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 8,102,386 1,021,492 (7,080,894) 13%
INTERFUND SERVICES 570,821 355,494 (215,327) 62%
11,299,679$ 1,788,486$ (9,511,193)$ 16%
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RESERVE:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 85,000$ 292,586$ 207,586$ 344%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,226,012 97,724 (1,128,288) 8%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 85,888 - (85,888) 0%
REVENUE BONDS 49,132 - (49,132) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 34,875 34,875 - 100%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 90,608 45,643 (44,965) 50%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 7 7 0%
1,571,515$ 470,835$ (1,100,680)$ 30%
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND:
SALARIES AND WAGES 218,537$ 142,550$ (75,987)$ 65%
OVERTIME 2,000 906 (1,094) 45%
BENEFITS 100,670 68,475 (32,195) 68%
UNIFORMS 1,000 499 (501) 50%
SUPPLIES 76,000 59,018 (16,982) 78%
FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 756 (244) 76%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 320,510 231,091 (89,419) 72%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 10,000 5,007 (4,993) 50%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 404 (596) 40%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 914 (2,586) 26%
TRAVEL 500 - (500) 0%
ADVERTISING 500 - (500) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 3,500 776 (2,724) 22%
INSURANCE 23,261 32,530 9,269 140%
UTILITIES 14,000 7,881 (6,119) 56%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 85,000 20,174 (64,826) 24%
MISCELLANEOUS 7,500 5,177 (2,323) 69%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,440 (1,060) 58%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 420,000 336,363 (83,637) 80%
INTERFUND SERVICES 20,000 - (20,000) 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 10,356 6,904 (3,452) 67%
1,321,334$ 920,866$ (400,468)$ 70%
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND:
BENEFITS 66,515$ 37,421$ (29,094)$ 56%
PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 52,500 24,624 (27,876) 47%
PROF SERVICES 4,500 1,065 (3,436) 24%
123,515$ 63,110$ (60,405)$ 51%
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT:
INSURANCE 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ 100%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 595,000 49,936 (545,064) 8%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (To 111)- 377,317 377,317 0%
600,000$ 432,253$ (167,747)$ 72%
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 79,268,066$ 41,168,095$ (38,099,937)$ 52%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 154 of 532
32
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
CITY COUNCIL 269,812$ 169,859$ (99,953)$ 63%
OFFICE OF MAYOR 253,184 151,165 (102,019) 60%
HUMAN RESOURCES 286,799 153,006 (133,793) 53%
MUNICIPAL COURT 779,038 485,375 (293,663) 62%
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 138,880 73,577 (65,303) 53%
CITY CLERK 609,840 328,124 (281,716) 54%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,412,575 873,040 (539,535) 62%
CITY ATTORNEY 495,000 313,126 (181,874) 63%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL 13,414,538 9,092,509 (4,322,029) 68%
POLICE SERVICES 9,165,244 5,532,985 (3,632,259) 60%
COMMUNITY SERVICES 326,930 208,782 (118,148) 64%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1,658,272 1,033,577 (624,695) 62%
PARKS & RECREATION 3,506,852 2,241,823 (1,265,029) 64%
PUBLIC WORKS 1,612,816 1,064,110 (548,706) 66%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,351,548 856,140 (495,408) 63%
35,281,328$ 22,577,199$ (12,704,129)$ 64%
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 2,174,153$ 1,157,358$ (1,016,795)$ 53%
WATER 5,158,024 2,873,359 (2,284,665) 56%
SEWER 4,506,994 1,785,263 (2,721,731) 40%
TREATMENT PLANT 3,531,230 2,217,231 (1,313,999) 63%
15,370,401$ 8,033,212$ (7,337,189)$ 52%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES - COMBINED UTILITY- BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 155 of 532
33
Page 1 of 4
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES 105,665$ 70,916$ (34,749)$ 67%
OVERTIME 7,240 3,975 (3,265) 55%
BENEFITS 69,902 47,438 (22,464) 68%
SUPPLIES 1,525 573 (952) 38%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 50,000 37,523 (12,477) 75%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,799 (1,201) 60%
TRAVEL 2,500 879 (1,621) 35%
RENTAL/LEASE 480 311 (169) 65%
REPAIRS/MAINT 1,500 - (1,500) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 28,000 6,445 (21,555) 23%
269,812$ 169,859$ (99,953)$ 63%
OFFICE OF MAYOR
SALARIES 193,896$ 118,635$ (75,261)$ 61%
OVERTIME - - - 0%
BENEFITS 49,188 27,286 (21,902) 55%
SUPPLIES 2,000 460 (1,540) 23%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
COMMUNICATION 1,400 737 (663) 53%
TRAVEL 700 731 31 104%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,500 1,633 133 109%
REPAIR/MAINT 500 - (500) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 1,684 (1,316) 56%
253,184$ 151,165$ (102,019)$ 60%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES 144,191$ 58,914$ (85,277)$ 41%
OVERTIME - - - 0%
BENEFITS 32,098 22,034 (10,064) 69%
SUPPLIES 2,500 1,516 (984) 61%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 100 - (100) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 77,500 59,534 (17,966) 77%
COMMUNICATIONS 500 244 (256) 49%
TRAVEL 500 - (500) 0%
ADVERTISING 9,000 683 (8,317) 8%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 1,558 (442) 78%
REPAIR/MAINT 6,000 4,820 (1,180) 80%
MISCELLANEOUS 12,410 3,703 (8,707) 30%
286,799$ 153,006$ (133,793)$ 53%
MUNICIPAL COURT
SALARIES 486,685$ 309,046$ (177,639)$ 64%
OVERTIME 1,400 572 (828) 41%
BENEFITS 172,053 112,641 (59,412) 65%
SUPPLIES 14,500 6,491 (8,009) 45%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,500 - (6,500) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66,600 36,040 (30,560) 54%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,600 1,438 (1,162) 55%
TRAVEL 2,500 1,517 (983) 61%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,300 385 (916) 30%
REPAIR/MAINT 2,200 961 (1,239) 44%
MISCELLANEOUS 22,350 16,194 (6,156) 72%
INTERGOVTL SVC 350 92 (258) 26%
779,038$ 485,375$ (293,663)$ 62%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 156 of 532
34
Page 2 of 4
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
BENEFITS -$ 13$ 13$ 0%
SUPPLIES 500 1,330 830 266%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 - (300) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 103,680 66,685 (36,995) 64%
COMMUNICATIONS 400 94 (306) 24%
TRAVEL 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
ADVERTISING 30,000 3,939 (26,061) 13%
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 1,516 (1,484) 51%
138,880$ 73,577$ (65,303)$ 53%
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES 302,054$ 193,242$ (108,812)$ 64%
BENEFITS 90,045 60,411 (29,634) 67%
SUPPLIES 13,760 6,138 (7,622) 45%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89,377 12,290 (77,087) 14%
COMMUNICATIONS 52,067 20,248 (31,819) 39%
TRAVEL 1,000 7 (993) 1%
ADVERTISING 23,690 14,689 (9,001) 62%
RENTAL/LEASE 27,310 10,868 (16,442) 40%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 8,037 7,778 (259) 97%
MISCELLANEOUS 2,500 2,453 (47) 98%
609,840$ 328,124$ (281,716)$ 54%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SALARIES 741,281$ 475,100$ (266,181)$ 64%
OVERTIME 8,100 5,250 (2,850) 65%
BENEFITS 222,830 149,563 (73,267) 67%
SUPPLIES 60,690 23,585 (37,105) 39%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 63,500 59,594 (3,906) 94%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,842 26,302 (45,540) 37%
COMMUNICATIONS 60,220 40,129 (20,091) 67%
TRAVEL 4,800 1,108 (3,692) 23%
RENTAL/LEASE 3,300 3,004 (296) 91%
REPAIR/MAINT 164,720 75,466 (89,254) 46%
MISCELLANEOUS 10,500 13,411 2,911 128%
INTERFUND RENTAL 792 528 (264) 67%
1,412,575$ 873,040$ (539,535)$ 62%
CITY ATTORNEY
PROFESSIONAL SVC 495,000$ 312,926$ (182,074)$ 63%
MISC PROSECUTOR - 200 200 0%
495,000$ 313,126$ (181,874)$ 63%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES 100,000$ -$ (100,000)$ 0%
BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 70,000 33,756 (36,244) 48%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 294,962 154,144 (140,818) 52%
COMMUNICATIONS - 4 4 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 3,700 3,600 (100) 97%
INSURANCE 444,962 420,109 (24,853) 94%
MISCELLANEOUS 72,300 40,023 (32,277) 55%
INTERGOVT SVC 7,611,611 5,605,144 (2,006,467) 74%
ECA LOAN PAYMENT 250,000 80,635 (169,365) 32%
EXCISE TAXES 5,200 4,319 (881) 83%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,914,623 2,434,926 (479,697) 84%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 1,084,062 - (1,084,062) 0%
INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 63,380 63,380 (0) 100%
OTHER DEBT - - - 0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 296,838 149,706 (147,132) 50%
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 5,000 1,125 (3,875) 23%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - - - 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 197,900 101,638 (96,262) 51%
13,414,538$ 9,092,509$ (4,322,029)$ 68%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 157 of 532
35
Page 3 of 4
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
POLICE SERVICES
SALARIES 5,400,738$ 3,386,092$ (2,014,646)$ 63%
OVERTIME 420,000 249,666 (170,334) 59%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK 179,687 2,526 (177,161) 1%
BENEFITS 1,899,147 1,172,794 (726,353) 62%
UNIFORMS 53,570 35,514 (18,056) 66%
SUPPLIES 95,900 62,821 (33,079) 66%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 14,300 2,941 (11,359) 21%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 95,200 57,317 (37,883) 60%
COMMUNICATIONS 33,592 16,947 (16,645) 50%
TRAVEL 26,300 7,785 (18,515) 30%
ADVERTISING 375 66 (309) 18%
RENTAL/LEASE 18,000 10,133 (7,867) 56%
REPAIR/MAINT 16,115 4,318 (11,797) 27%
MISCELLANEOUS 55,512 29,833 (25,679) 54%
INTERGOVTL SVC 536,048 279,558 (256,490) 52%
INTERFUND FUEL-BOAT - 55 55 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 320,760 213,840 (106,920) 67%
INTERFUND REPAIRS - 780 780 0%
9,165,244$ 5,532,985$ (3,632,259)$ 60%
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN
SALARIES 212,854$ 140,344$ (72,510)$ 66%
BENEFITS 60,622 41,542 (19,080) 69%
SUPPLIES 1,000 276 (724) 28%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 500 - (500) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 45,924 23,713 (22,211) 52%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,090 536 (554) 49%
TRAVEL 1,000 18 (982) 2%
ADVERTISING 500 - (500) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,320 1,565 245 119%
REPAIR/MAINT 500 - (500) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 371 (629) 37%
INTERFUND RENTAL 620 416 (204) 67%
326,930$ 208,782$ (118,148)$ 64%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES 1,071,681$ 692,887$ (378,794)$ 65%
OVERTIME 2,800 2,360 (440) 84%
BENEFITS 374,639 248,451 (126,188) 66%
UNIFORMS 320 - (320) 0%
SUPPLIES 17,510 8,354 (9,156) 48%
MINOR EQUIPMENT 2,300 472 (1,828) 21%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 116,890 40,024 (76,867) 34%
COMMUNICATIONS 4,630 3,432 (1,198) 74%
TRAVEL 3,500 426 (3,074) 12%
ADVERTISING 4,250 1,433 (2,817) 34%
RENTAL/LEASE 22,500 14,080 (8,420) 63%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 2,000 606 (1,394) 30%
MISCELLANEOUS 27,600 15,948 (11,652) 58%
INTERFUND RENTAL 7,652 5,104 (2,548) 67%
1,658,272$ 1,033,577$ (624,695)$ 62%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES 958,860$ 628,503$ (330,357)$ 66%
OVERTIME 5,000 888 (4,112) 18%
BENEFITS 321,636 222,146 (99,490) 69%
UNIFORMS 450 - (450) 0%
SUPPLIES - - - 0%
MINOR EQUIPMENT 2,500 2,398 (102) 96%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 5,000 2,070 (2,930) 41%
COMMUNICATIONS 6,500 3,578 (2,922) 55%
TRAVEL 620 463 (157) 75%
ADVERTISING - - - 0%
RENTAL/LEASE - - - 0%
REPAIR/MAINT 1,800 895 (905) 50%
MISCELLANEOUS 9,600 7,117 (2,483) 74%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 6,740 4,496 (2,244) 67%
1,318,706$ 872,553$ (446,153)$ 66%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 158 of 532
36
Page 4 of 4
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
PARKS & RECREATION
SALARIES 1,880,905$ 1,237,113$ (643,792)$ 66%
OVERTIME 5,300 6,071 771 115%
BENEFITS 571,640 402,255 (169,385) 70%
UNIFORMS 6,540 2,071 (4,469) 32%
SUPPLIES 145,026 77,487 (67,539) 53%
MINOR EQUIPMENT 35,012 33,568 (1,444) 96%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 339,666 185,985 (153,681) 55%
COMMUNICATIONS 28,938 18,329 (10,609) 63%
TRAVEL 6,140 1,119 (5,021) 18%
ADVERTISING 3,852 2,859 (993) 74%
RENTAL/LEASE 50,471 40,603 (9,868) 80%
PUBLIC UTILITY 150,000 105,036 (44,964) 70%
REPAIR/MAINT 52,025 27,588 (24,437) 53%
MISCELLANEOUS 76,370 51,987 (24,383) 68%
INTERGOVTL SVC 70,695 5,000 (65,695) 7%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 17,144 - (17,144) 0%
INTERFUND RENTAL 67,128 44,752 (22,376) 67%
3,506,852$ 2,241,823$ (1,265,029)$ 64%
PUBLIC WORKS
SALARIES 208,578$ 140,866$ (67,712)$ 68%
OVERTIME 200 - (200) 0%
BENEFITS 64,638 43,010 (21,628) 67%
SUPPLIES 5,100 2,790 (2,310) 55%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 33 (167) 17%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,100 740 (360) 67%
TRAVEL 500 - (500) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 7,400 676 (6,724) 9%
PUBLIC UTILITY 2,500 1,479 (1,021) 59%
REPAIR/MAINT 1,000 - (1,000) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 699 (301) 70%
INTERFUND RENTAL 1,894 1,264 (630) 67%
294,110$ 191,557$ (102,553)$ 65%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES 592,852$ 403,308$ (189,544)$ 68%
OVERTIME 8,500 1,761 (6,739) 21%
BENEFITS 245,736 163,094 (82,642) 66%
UNIFORMS 3,000 1,406 (1,594) 47%
SUPPLIES 75,000 45,855 (29,145) 61%
FUEL CONSUMED 700 - (700) 0%
MINOR EQUIPMENT 8,000 1,866 (6,134) 23%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - - 0%
TRAVEL - 35 35 0%
COMMUNICATIONS 14,000 8,524 (5,476) 61%
PUBLIC UTILITY 302,000 175,293 (126,707) 58%
REPAIR/MAINT 75,000 35,843 (39,157) 48%
MISCELLANEOUS 2,100 2,714 614 129%
INTERFUND RENTAL 24,660 16,440 (8,220) 67%
1,351,548$ 856,140$ (495,408)$ 63%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 35,281,328$ 22,577,199$ (12,704,129)$ 64%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 159 of 532
37
Page 1 of 2
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
STORM DRAINAGE
SALARIES 477,207$ 294,221$ (182,986)$ 62%
OVERTIME 6,000 4,666 (1,334) 78%
BENEFITS 195,826 120,888 (74,938) 62%
UNIFORMS 6,500 4,513 (1,987) 69%
SUPPLIES 58,005 26,845 (31,160) 46%
MINOR EQUIPMENT 4,000 - (4,000) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,836 5,672 (13,164) 30%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 883 (2,317) 28%
TRAVEL 4,300 - (4,300) 0%
ADVERTISING 500 - (500) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 7,500 3,267 (4,233) 44%
INSURANCE 9,302 8,889 (413) 96%
UTILITIES 10,000 5,619 (4,381) 56%
REPAIR/MAINT 12,860 5,139 (7,721) 40%
MISCELLANEOUS 78,500 66,265 (12,235) 84%
INTERGOVT SERVICE 40,000 42,528 2,528 106%
STORMWATER TAX 254,061 192,656 (61,405) 76%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 412)200,000 - (200,000) 0%
LAND - - - 0%
BUILDINGS - - - 0%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - - - 0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 108,298 - (108,298) 0%
REVENUE BOND 68,724 - (68,724) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOAN 32,063 32,063 (1) 100%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 183,267 88,129 (95,138) 48%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - - - 0%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 78 78 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 228,092 143,630 (84,462) 63%
INTERFUND RENTAL 167,112 111,408 (55,704) 67%
2,174,153$ 1,157,358$ (1,016,795)$ 53%
WATER
SALARIES 715,880$ 445,856$ (270,024)$ 62%
OVERTIME 24,180 12,816 (11,364) 53%
BENEFITS 267,990 192,490 (75,500) 72%
UNIFORMS 6,800 2,366 (4,434) 35%
SUPPLIES 143,505 101,483 (42,022) 71%
WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,410,000 775,116 (634,884) 55%
SUPPLIES FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 140,000 66,380 (73,620) 47%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 10,000 - (10,000) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 77,136 15,904 (61,232) 21%
COMMUNICATIONS 30,000 18,605 (11,395) 62%
TRAVEL 3,400 - (3,400) 0%
ADVERTISING 560 - (560) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,500 2,691 1,191 179%
INSURANCE 84,030 70,440 (13,590) 84%
PUBLIC UTILITY 28,000 22,469 (5,531) 80%
REPAIR/MAINT 24,160 7,220 (16,940) 30%
RCP - MISCELLANEOUS 301,630 202,964 (98,666) 67%
INTERGOVTL SVC 30,000 18,623 (11,378) 62%
WATER TAX 824,935 534,742 (290,193) 65%
INTERFUND TRANSFER-OUT (to 412)200,000 - (200,000) 0%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 1,980 - (1,980) 0%
REVENUE BOND 181,627 - (181,627) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 44,270 45,839 1,569 104%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 260,432 121,818 (138,614) 47%
AMORTIZED DEBT ISSUE COSTS 16,553 1,379 (15,174) 8%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 163 163 0%
INTERFUND SVC 224,970 144,340 (80,630) 64%
INTERFUND RENTAL 104,486 69,656 (34,830) 67%
5,158,024$ 2,873,359$ (2,284,665)$ 56%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - COMBINED UTILITY- BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 160 of 532
38
Page 2 of 2
Title
2012 Amended
Budget
8/31/2012
Expenditures Variance % Used
SEWER
SALARIES 434,516$ 297,581$ (136,935)$ 68%
OVERTIME 17,000 13,992 (3,008) 82%
BENEFITS 206,345 141,789 (64,556) 69%
UNIFORMS 5,100 3,014 (2,086) 59%
SUPPLIES 61,005 31,393 (29,612) 51%
SEWER INVENTORY 3,000 3,300 300 110%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,000 1,511 (4,489) 25%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 53,836 6,376 (47,460) 12%
COMMUNICATIONS 30,000 16,832 (13,168) 56%
TRAVEL 2,400 - (2,400) 0%
ADVERTISING 500 - (500) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,800 2,759 959 153%
INSURANCE 104,574 94,658 (9,916) 91%
PUBLIC UTILITY 533,813 208,749 (325,064) 39%
REPAIR/MAINT 16,860 7,076 (9,784) 42%
MISCELLANEOUS 130,000 95,247 (34,753) 73%
INTERGOVTL SVS 393,900 25,676 (368,224) 7%
SEWER UTILITY TAX 470,000 311,413 (158,587) 66%
INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 412, 414)1,452,811 197,859 (1,254,952) 14%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 1,584 - (1,584) 0%
REVENUE BONDS 106,475 - (106,475) 0%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 104,065 104,065 (0) 100%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 50,044 26,683 (23,361) 53%
AMORTIZED DEBT ISSUE COSTS 16,551 1,379 (15,172) 8%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 28 28 0%
INTERFUND SVC 176,571 108,387 (68,184) 61%
INTERFUND RENTAL 128,244 85,496 (42,748) 67%
INTERFUND REPAIR/MAINT - - - 0%
4,506,994$ 1,785,263$ (2,721,731)$ 40%
TREATMENT PLANT
SALARIES 1,163,520$ 746,006$ (417,514)$ 64%
OVERTIME 70,000 48,736 (21,264) 70%
BENEFITS 443,546 289,511 (154,035) 65%
UNIFORMS 10,250 5,660 (4,590) 55%
SUPPLIES 412,500 265,850 (146,650) 64%
FUEL CONSUMED 150,723 106,346 (44,377) 71%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,500 348 (5,152) 6%
PROFESSIONAL SVC 79,000 90,075 11,075 114%
COMMUNICATIONS 9,000 6,198 (2,802) 69%
TRAVEL 8,500 158 (8,342) 2%
ADVERTISING 2,000 1,177 (823) 59%
RENTAL/LEASE 5,500 1,972 (3,528) 36%
INSURANCE 90,305 68,242 (22,063) 76%
UTILITIES 428,040 279,789 (148,251) 65%
REPAIR/MAINT 78,050 62,146 (15,904) 80%
MISCELLANEOUS 82,750 48,861 (33,889) 59%
INTERGOVTL SVS 204,000 70,890 (133,110) 35%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 4 4 0%
REVENUE BOND 88,673 - (88,673) 0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 3,244 1,492 (1,752) 46%
INTERFUND SVC 188,821 118,899 (69,922) 63%
INTERFUND RENTAL 7,308 4,872 (2,436) 67%
3,531,230$ 2,217,231$ (1,313,999)$ 63%
Total Combined Utility Fund Expenditures 15,370,401$ 8,033,212$ (7,337,189)$ 52%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - COMBINED UTILITY- BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 161 of 532
AM-5179 3. E.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Quarterly Public Works Project Report.
Recommendation
The report is being provided for information.
Previous Council Action
On April 17, 2012, the first quarter report was provided to the City Council.
On July 17, 2012, the second quarter report was provided to the City Council.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for information.
Narrative
Attached is a quarterly report for capital improvement projects managed by the Public Works
Department. The third quarter report for 2012 contains information on the estimated project budget, 2012
budget, change orders, funding sources and schedule.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - PW Quarterly Project Report
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/10/2012 02:50 PM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:03 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 11:26 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 162 of 532
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program Status
City or Total 2012 Change City Complete **Active
Project Description Type
Consultant Budget Budget Orders Grants Fund(s) #Advertise Const Phase Comments
Frances Anderson Roof Repairs
and ADA Upgrades
Facilities Consultant $225,000 $225,000 __116 After
Design is
complete
Summer
2013
Des ●Design work continues and is now approximately 30%
complete.
●Contract with Schreiber, Starling and Lane has produced cost
estimate for inclusion in budget request for 2013.
Public Works Yard Water Quality
Upgrade (Vehicle Wash Station &
Cover for Material Piles)
Facilities Consultant $115,000 $125,000 __412 __Pre ● Ecology grant for $269,745 to update to waste handing facility
at Public Works Yard approved by Council - $86,582 will be
used for grant match (25%).
● Purchase of Spoil pile covers underway
76th Avenue West/75th Place
West Walkway
Parks Gray &
Osborne
$3,024,065 $0 $818,513 _125 Apr-09 Nov-10 Cl-Out ●Construction is complete.
●Contractor has submitted a $951,924 claim for equitable
adjustment. The claim has been reviewed and a change order
for $92,710 has been sent to the contractor for signature.
●Change Order 1: $59,895; Change Order 2: $28,584; Change
Order 3: $22,117; Change Order 4: $10,096; Change Order 5:
$15,799; Change Order 6: $131,547; Change Order
7:$245,297;Change Order 8: $167,739; Change Order #9:
$25,109; Change Order #10: $19,618; Change Order #11:
$92,710.
●$77,000-2012 Budget Amend (1st Qtr)
●$103,000-2012 Budget Amend (May)
Dayton Street Plaza Parks Barker $160,605 $135,500 __132 TBD TBD On-Hold ●Design at 100%.
Interurban Trail Parks KPFF $2,430,000 $206,000 $145,556 $1,325,703 132 May-11 Jun-12 Cl-Out ● Construction is complete.
● Change order 1: $37,757
● Change order 2: $2,240
● Change order 3: $41,003
● Change order 4: $13,412
● Change order 5: $7,257
● Change order 6: $4,680
● Change order 7: $0
● Change order 8: $33,275
● Change order 9: $4,152
● Change order 10: $1,780
● $314,414-Budget Amendment (1st Qtr)
2012 - Alder/Dellwood/Beach
Pl/244th Sewer Replacement
Sewer City $1,257,627 $1,235,000 __412 Mar-13 Oct-13 Des ●Design 70% Complete
●Expected Ad Date March2013.
●Coordination with OVWSD to transfer ownership of pipe for
sewer west of 224th & 76th completed Sept 18, 2012. Interlocal
signed with OVWSD for repairs of a small portion of sewer east
of 224th & 76th signed August 2012.
2013 Sewer Replacement Project Sewer City $2,027,000 $148,000 __412 May-13 Nov-13 Des ●Construction Surveying in progress expected to be complete by
Mid Oct. 2012.
Alder CIPP(Citywide CIPP Sewer
Rehab)
Sewer City $106,000 $106,000 __412 May-13 Oct-13 Des ●Design Complete
Project was bid in August 2012. No responsive bidders.
●Construction delayed until 2013 due to bidding climate. Project
will be added to the 2013 projects so that it is more likely to be
bid by contractors.
Lift Station 2 Sewer BHC $830,136 $346,000 __412 Jun-11 Mar-12 Cl-Out ● Complete.
Lift Stations 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12,
14 & 15
Sewer CHS $4,602,121 $2,897,000 __412 Aug-12 Jun-13 Con ● Construction contract awarded to Razz Construction.
● Preconstruction meeting 10-3-12
ScheduleProject Budget
10/4/2012 PAGE 1Packet Page 163 of 532
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program Status
City or Total 2012 Change City Complete **Active
Project Description Type
Consultant Budget Budget Orders Grants Fund(s) #Advertise Const Phase Comments
ScheduleProject Budget
Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive
Plan
Sewer BHC $174,000 $174,000 __412 __Study ●Contract finalized and Notice to proceed given March 2012.
●Data gathering for report completed July 2012.
●Modeling of sewer network in progress.
●First draft of report expected spring 2013.
238th St Drainage to Hickman
Park
Storm City $646,000 $105,000 __412 Mar-13 Sep-13 Des ● Survey completed
● Geotechnical work scheduled for late September 2012
● Public meeting will be held F4Q 2012
● 100% design 1Q 2013
95th/93rd Pl Stormwater
Improvements
Storm City $226,000 $26,000 __412 Jun-13 Oct-13 Pre ● Design & construct in 2013
City-Wide Drainage Improv.Storm City $143,000 $143,000 __412 __Pre ● Geotechnical firm evaluated Meadowdale piezometers and
historical water level measurements.
● Minor maintenance made to piezometers, no trends in water
level measurements of note.
Dayton St & SR 104 Drainage
Improvement Study
Storm Consultant $150,000 $150,000 __412 __Study ● Modeling task 75% completed.
● Preliminary alternatives 3Q 2013
Dayton St. Storm Improvements
(6th to 8th)
Storm City $150,000 $150,000 __412 __On-Hold ● Awaiting availability of overlay funds prior to initiating
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
(w/People for Puget Sound)
Storm Consultant $150,000 $150,000 __412 __Study ● People for Puget Sound's selected consultant working on
surveying, data gathering, and modeling.
● Estimated completion 1Q 2013
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Storm City $102,000 $102,000 __412 Apr-13 Oct-13 Des ● McAleer Creek culvert replacement @ 60% Design; Project
managed by City of Mountlake Terrace.
● Mountlake Terrace permitting to be completed early 4Q 2012,
construction scheduled to begin 2Q 2014
North Talbot Road Drainage
Improvement
Storm CHS $180,000 $180,000 $2,738 _412 May-12 Oct-12 Cl-Out ●Advertised as Small Works Project.
●Project awarded to Laser Underground & Earthworks for
$49,083.38
●Change Order #1: ($2,737.50)
●Construction completed ahead of schedule and 5% under
budget.
Perrinville Creek Culvert
Replacement @ Talbot Rd
Storm Consultant $147,600 $147,600 __412 __Pre ●Preliminary Design Report currently under review by Staff
SW Edmonds #4-106/105 Storm City $0 $15,000 __412 __On-Hold ● Monitoring area to assess scope of project need
Talbot Rd / Perrinville Creek
Drainage Improvement & Habitat
Enhancement-Phase II
Storm City $598,000 $598,000 -$66,107 _412 May-12 Oct-12 Con ● Under construction
● Construction should be complete by mid October
●Change Order #1: $1,939.90
●Change Order #2: -$68,047.10
100th @ 238th St. SW Street City $5,500 $5,500 __112 _Oct-12 Con ● Work description: convert protected left turn phasing to
protected / permissive for the northbound movement at 100th
Ave. W @ 238th St. SW
228th St. SW Corridor Safety
Improvements
Street Perteet $5,013,000 $355,000 _$4,769,000 112 Apr-14 Dec-14 Des ● Design at 60%.
● Federal grants were secured (Design: $407,000; ROW :
$829,000, and Construction : $3,533,000).
76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
Street Dave Evans $2,760,000 $291,000 _$940,397 112 TBD TBD Des ● A Federal grant (CMAQ) was secured for the design and right-
of-way acquisition phases (Design: $294,100 ; ROW: $646,297).
Citywide Pedestrian Countdown
Display & Cabinet Upgrades
Street TBD $300,000 $10,000 _$300,000 112 Aug-13 Dec-13 Pre ● A Federal Grant was secured for $300,000 for the upgrade of
all pedestrian heads to a pedestrian countdown display at all
signalized intersection and several cabinet upgrades.
10/4/2012 PAGE 2Packet Page 164 of 532
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program Status
City or Total 2012 Change City Complete **Active
Project Description Type
Consultant Budget Budget Orders Grants Fund(s) #Advertise Const Phase Comments
ScheduleProject Budget
Five Corners Roundabout (212th
St. SW @ 84th Av. W)
Street Dave Evans $3,476,000 $323,000 _$463,000 112 / 412 May-13 Dec-13 Des ● Design at 75%
● The City secured an additional $1,936,500 in federal grant
money for the right of way and construction phases.
Main St. @ 9th Ave.(interim
solution)
Street Heffron $10,000 $0 __112 _Dec-13 Pre ● Project programmed for 2013 in 2013-2018 CIP.
Transportation Plan Update Street Heffron $20,000 $20,000 __112 __Pre ● Perform trafifc modeling analysis to support an amendment to
the City of Edmonds future land use map (at Wesgate and Five
Corners).
Walnut St. @ 9th Ave. (interim
solution)
Street Heffron $10,000 $0 __112 _TBD Pre ● Restripe 9th Ave. from Cedar St to Alder St., to improve
intersection delay at intersection.
State Route (SR) 99 International
District Enhancements (Phase 1,
2)
Street CH2MHill $615,800 $313,000 _$662,000 129 Apr-12 Dec-12 Con ● Grants were secured in the amount of $662,000 (design and
construction phases) for Phase 1 and 2.
State Route (SR) 99 International
District Enhancements (Phase 3)
Street TBD $684,000 ___112 Apr-14 Dec-14 Pre ● A grant for complete funding of the design / construction of
Phase 3 was recently secured (total of $685,000).
Sunset Walkway Improvements Street Parametrix $882,000 $50,000 __112 _TBD Pre ● TIB grant was submitted in August for design and construction
funding.
Main Street Pedestrian Lighting
from 5th Ave to 6th Ave
Street Parametrix $1,631,857 $890,300 _$1,225,000 112 & 412 Jul-12 Nov-12 Con ● Construction contract awarded to Interwest Construction, Inc.
● Notice to Proceed 9-10-12.
● A Federal grant was secured for design and construction (total
amount: $725,000).
● A State grant was secured for design and construction (total
amount: $500,000).
●$312,000 - 2012 Budget Amendment (August)
2010 Replacement Program-
Waterline
Water City $2,164,986 $238,600 $72,111 _412 Jan-11 Jan-12 Complete ●Construction complete. Council Approval received Sept. 18,
2012. Retainage release in progress.
Substantial Completion Reached January 2012.
●Change order #1 $40,953.
●Change order #2 $10,548.43.
●Change order #3 $8,380.31
●Change order #4 $12,229.18
2011 Replacement Program-
Waterline
Water MSA $2,364,506 $507,800 $50,112 _412 Jun-11 Mar-12 Cl-out ●Construction Complete March 2012.
●Construction Closeout in Progress. Substantial completion
reached march 2012.
●Change order #1 $24,070.93
●Change order #2 $33,785.22
●Change order #3 ($7,744.22)
●Budget Amendment $390,000 (1st Qtr)
2012 Citywide Waterline Overlay
Project
Water _$526,400 $526,400 __412 Jul-12 Nov-12 Con ●Contract Awarded to Northshore Paving Inc..
●5th Avenue portion of overlay received federal funding, will be
spun off into a separate project.
2012 Replacement Program -
Waterline
Water City $1,150,000 $1,100,000 __412 Jun-12 Nov-12 Con ●Design @ 100% complete.
●Advertised June, 2012.
●Council awarded contract to D&G Backhoe, Inc, for
$652,352.23
●Construction in progress. Completion expected to take place
Nov 2012.
2013 Replacement Program -
Waterline
Water City $2,394,880 $88,000 __412 Mar-13 Nov-13 Des ●Construction Surveying in progress expected to be complete by
Mid Oct. 2012.
76th Ave W Waterline Extension
with Lynnwood
Water Roth Hill $550,000 $550,000 __412 Oct-12 Sep-13 Ad ●Design to be completed June 2012.
Project to be bid Oct 2012.
●Construction to begin March 2013.
10/4/2012 PAGE 3Packet Page 165 of 532
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS
Capital Improvement Program Status
City or Total 2012 Change City Complete **Active
Project Description Type
Consultant Budget Budget Orders Grants Fund(s) #Advertise Const Phase Comments
ScheduleProject Budget
AMR Meter Evaluation Study Water Consultant $50,000 $0 __412 __On hold ●On hold.
Pioneer Way Road Repair Water City $0 $0 __412 Mar-13 Nov-13 Pre ●Surveyor and geotechnical engineer hired to assess condition
of Pioneer Way post Dec 2011 Watermain break.
●Geotechnical Report recommends monitoring of road and
slope too
●Budget Amendment $40,000 (2nd Qtr)
Waterline at break site to be relocated in 2013.
Aeration Basin Air Diffuser
Upgrade for Energy Savings
WWTP Brown &
Caldwell
$195,000 $45,000 __414 Apr-12 Oct-12 Constructi
on
●The project was awarded to Moon Construction.
●NTP was issued on 9/19/2012.
●The contractor is currently on site.
ATS Replacement and New
Building
WWTP HDR $450,000 $50,000 __414 Apr-12 Jul-13 Constructi
on
●Final design will be completed by Dec 2012.
●Initial Construction estimates were higher than expected so the
project construction has been pushed out to 2013.
Fiber Optic Network Installation WWTP Triunity
Engineering
$50,000 $50,000 __414 Mar-12 Dec-12 Constructi
on
●The project has been awarded to Teknon Corp.
●Construction is scheduled to be complete by Dec 2012.
Incinerator testing and evaluation
for compliance with new SSI
regulations
WWTP CH2M Hill $75,000 $75,000 __414 _Nov-12 Study/Des ●This project will consist of two pieces, AMTEST will conduct the
testing and CH2M will review the data, testing and suggested
approach. If improvements are required to meet new regulations,
design will take place in 2013 and construction in 2014.
Lighting Upgrade for Energy
Savings
WWTP Energy
Industries
$56,000 $35,862 __414 Jun-11 Nov-12 Constructi
on
●The second phase of the project is in progress.
●This will allow us to take advantage of energy incentives.
Non-Potable Water Pump
Modification for Energy Savings
WWTP City $40,000 $35,000 __414 Mar-12 Oct-12 Constructi
on
●We have received authorization from PUD and all equipment
has been delivered.
●This in house project is scheduled for completion by the end of
October.
Roof Replacement for Three
Buildings
WWTP Wetherholt $260,000 $362,000 __414 41102 Oct-12 Constructi
on
●This project was awarded to Krueger Sheet Metal.
●NTP was issued on 9/17/2012 and work on the Influent Bldg
has begun.
Switchgear access - Catwalk WWTP Brown &
Caldwell
$95,000 $75,000 __414 Jun-12 Oct-12 Constructi
on
●The contract has been awarded to Moon Construction.
●NTP was issued on 9/11/2012.
●The project will be complete by mid October.
Under Ground Diesel Storage
Tank (UST) Monitoring system up-
grade
WWTP Ace Tank $20,000 $20,000 __414 Jun-12 Aug-12 Close Out ●Project completed
VFD Replacements WWTP City $100,000 $50,000 __414 Feb-12 Mar-13 Constructi
on
●VFDs are onsite.
●We anticipate 1 to be completely installed, programmed and
online by end of year.
Ad Advertising
Pre
Des
ROW
Ad
Con
Cl-Out
Study
Close-out Construcion Contract
Study
Right-of-Way Acquisition
Advertise for Contruction Bids
**Active Phase
Preliminary Design
Design
Construction
10/4/2012 PAGE 4Packet Page 166 of 532
AM-5180 3. F.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Ed Sibrel Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Report on final construction costs for North Talbot Drainage Improvement Project and acceptance of
project.
Recommendation
Accept project.
Previous Council Action
On May 15, 2012 Council authorized and approved a permanent easement between the Cities of
Lynnwood and Edmonds for the project.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval.
Narrative
Roadway water from Talbot Road, north of 171st St SW, was washing onto the steep slope abutting the
Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant, depositing significant amounts of sediment onto the property.
Public Works crews had installed a temporary solution, and a permanent fix was designed in the spring of
2012.
On May 31, 2012, bids were solicited from the Small Works Roster for the project. Bids were read on
June 14, 2012. Laser Underground & Earthworks was the apparent low bidder in the amount of
$49,083.38. Laser Underground was subsequently awarded the contract on June 19, 2012.
The construction commenced on August 6, 2012, and physical completion of the project was attained
August 22, 2012. Construction was completed ahead of schedule and for $46,345.88 -- 5% under budget.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Site Map
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/10/2012 02:58 PM
Packet Page 167 of 532
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:04 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 11:31 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 168 of 532
B
E
R
T
O
LA RD
171ST ST S
W
7 6 T H A V E W
BURLINGTON NO R T H E N R A I L R O A D
T A L B O T R D
S E A L A W N D R
168th P
L S
W
171ST ST SW
T A L B O T R D
N O R T H TA L B O T R O A D
N O R T H TA L B O T R O A DD R A I N A G E P R O J E C T
D R A I N A G E P R O J E C T ·
P r o j e c t L o c a t i o n
Packet Page 169 of 532
AM-5181 3. G.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement No. 1 with Perteet for overlay and raised median on the
228th St. SW Corridor Improvement project.
Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign Supplement No. 1.
Previous Council Action
On August 2, 2011, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign the Local Agency Standard Consultant
Agreement with Perteet on the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement project.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval.
Narrative
The project will construct the missing link of roadway on 228th St SW from State Route (SR) 99 to 76th
Ave W. and install two new traffic signals at the intersections of SR99 / 228th St. SW and 76th Ave. W. /
228th St. SW. The center median will be extended on a portion of SR99 to restrict left turns and improve
safety. Sidewalk and bike lanes will be included along the new section of 228th St. SW.
The initial scope of the project provided new pavement in areas where improvements were being
constructed. Based on the review of the preliminary designs, existing pavement conditions of adjacent
streets and comments from the City of Mountlake Terrace, staff recommends the scope of the project be
increased to provide a complete overlay of 228th St. SW from 80th Ave W to 1,000 feet east of 72nd Ave
W and on 76th Ave W from 228th St. SW to SR99. The City of Mountlake Terrace requested the
pavement overlay within their jurisdiction, since the project is expected to increase east/west traffic
volumes along the 228th St. corridor.
In addition to increasing the pavement overlay limits, staff recommends a design review process to
evaluate options for upgrading and enhancing the center of the proposed raised median on SR99. Options
for a center median treatment could include decorative elements that would be implemented in place of an
asphalt concrete surface.
The proposed Supplement covers the professional services to design the pavement overlay and median
treatment. The design fee for Supplement No. 1 is $64,323 and will be paid by grant funds.
Packet Page 170 of 532
The City recently secured a federal transportation grant for $4,233,000 to complete the design, right of
way acquisition, and construction. No local match is required for this grant. The City has now received a
total of $4,769,000 in federal grant funds to complete this project.
The design phase, which began in August 2011, is scheduled for completion in spring 2014 and the right
of way acquisition phase is scheduled to begin this fall, for completion in spring 2014. Construction is
tentatively scheduled to begin in summer 2014.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Supplement 1
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/11/2012 11:50 AM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:53 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 11:40 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 171 of 532
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
2
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
3
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
4
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
5
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
6
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
7
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
8
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
17
9
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
0
of
53
2
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
1
of
53
2
AM-5184 3. H.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement #4 with David Evans & Associates for additional utility
work on the Five Corners Roundabout.
Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign Supplement #4.
Previous Council Action
On July 12, 2011, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign the Local Agency Standard Consultant
Agreement with David Evans & Associates for the Five Corners Roundabout project.
On July 17, 2012, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental #3 with David Evans &
Associates for utility work on the Five Corners Roundabout project.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval.
Narrative
The proposed supplemental agreement includes the following additions to the design plans,
specifications, and engineer’s estimate:
Installation of joint trench and vaults within the project limits:
Snohomish County PUD, Frontier, Comcast, Blackrock Cable, Puget Sound Energy, and Washington
State Department of Transportation have overhead utilities crossing the intersection. In order to improve
intersection aesthetics and remove all utility conflicts, all these facilities will be relocated and / or
undergrounded into the joint utility trench. The cost of the joint utility trench will be shared by the City,
Frontier, Comcast, Blackrock Cable and Puget Sound Energy. The utility companies will be responsible
for furnishing conduit and vaults and installing wires through the conduit system.
The proposed Supplement includes the professional services to design the joint trench and complete
pothole work in the intersection to identify potential conflicts during construction.
The cost of the supplemental agreement is $26,988 and will be paid by grant funding. A 13.5% local
match for the grant funding is required and will be paid by the 112 Street Fund.
The City will receive a federal transportation grant for $1,936,500 to complete right of way acquisition
Packet Page 182 of 532
and construction. The project has now received a total of $2,399,500 in federal grant funds. A large
percentage of the 13.5% local match will be paid from traffic impact fees.
The design phase, which began in August 2011, is scheduled for completion in spring 2013 and the right
of way acquisition phase is scheduled to begin this fall, for completion in spring 2013. Construction is
tentatively scheduled to begin in summer 2013.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Supplement No. 4
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/11/2012 11:50 AM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:09 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 12:03 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 183 of 532
Th
e
S
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
4
t
o
t
a
l
i
s
$
2
6
,
9
8
8
(
s
e
e
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
E
-
1
)
.
T
h
e
N
e
w
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
A
m
o
u
n
t
P
a
y
a
b
l
e
i
s
$
4
0
5
,
6
9
3
.
$
4
0
5
,
6
9
3
.
0
0
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
18
4
of
53
2
Exhibit A 1
Five Corners Roundabout
Intersection Improvement Project
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Supplement No. 4
Prepared for:
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Prepared by:
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
415 118th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98005 3518
(425) 519 6500
October 2, 2012
Packet Page 185 of 532
P:\c\COED00000003\0000CON\0030Contract\Supplements\Supplement 4 Joint Utility Trench\Exhibit A 1_DEA Scope_Five Corners Roundabout_2012 1002.doc
City of Edmonds 1 Supplement No. 4
Five Corners Roundabout Project October 2, 2012
City of Edmonds
Five Corners Roundabout
Intersection Improvement Project
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Supplement No. 4
Introduction
Supplement No. 4 modifies the original agreement dated August 5, 2011 with the following revisions.
7.2 Utility Conflict Resolution
Section 7.2 Utility Conflict Resolution is supplemented with the following:
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with utility providers for the relocation and/or undergrounding of
their existing facilities, design a joint utility trench, and separate bid schedules to determine
proportionate shares of trench costs for each utility provider. The CITY agrees to work cooperatively
with the CONSULTANT as the franchise controller of the utilities and assist with having the utilities
respond with plans and information regarding their facilities in a timely and responsive manner. The
CONSULTANT will perform the following work tasks as identified below:
Utility Meetings
• Attend up to three Utility Coordination Meetings; prepare meeting records and distribute to all
attendees.
• Utility trench design and estimating.
• Prepare joint utility trench cross section design to accommodate conduit for Snohomish County
PUD, Puget Sound Energy (PSE), Frontier Communications, Blackrock Communications,
WSDOT (Lane Communications) and Comcast.
• Prepare utilities plan including joint trench location, vaults, pedestals, and utility pole relocations
based on information obtained from utility providers.
• Prepare specifications for joint trench construction and identify portions of work to be performed
by CITY’s contractor and work to be performed by private utilities.
• Submit plans and specifications for review by CITY and the utilities. Update plans and
specifications based on comments received from CITY and utilities and incorporate into the
PS&E package.
Deliverables
• Utility Meeting Records
• Preliminary roadway plans (to utility providers 11”x17” hard copy)
• Preliminary utility trench section and plan layout (to utility providers – 11”x17” hard copy and
AutoCAD file)
• Final utility trench section and plan layout (to utility providers – 11”x17” hard copy and
AutoCAD file)
• Preliminary and final specifications (to CITY – MS Word)
• Utility trenching and conduit cost estimate (to CITY – MS Excel)
Packet Page 186 of 532
P:\c\COED00000003\0000CON\0030Contract\Supplements\Supplement 4 Joint Utility Trench\Exhibit A 1_DEA Scope_Five Corners Roundabout_2012 1002.doc
City of Edmonds 2 Supplement No. 4
Five Corners Roundabout Project October 2, 2012
Utility Potholing/Relocations
It is anticipated that potholing of utilities will be necessary to determine locations for developing the
design. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for potholing services which include surface locates by
One Call. Measure downs for vertical depth shall be provided by the CONSULTANT. Hubs shall be
placed in the field by the CONSULTANT to allow for survey by the CONSULTANT of the horizontal
pothole locations by the CONSULTANT. For estimating purposes, the CONSULTANT assumes thirty
(30) locations may be potholed and surveyed.
The CONSULTANT shall use Applied Professions Services, Inc. (APS) to perform the potholing. APS
will invoice the franchise utilities (Puget Sound Energy and Frontier Communications) directly for their
proportionate share of the potholing expense (i.e., up to 24 of the 30 anticipated potholes). Potholing to
identify depths and locations for the Snohomish County PUD (up to 3 of the 30 anticipated potholes) will
be invoiced to the CONSULTANT. CITY owned utilities to be potholed (up to 3 of the anticipated
potholes) will be invoiced to the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall determine the extent to which the proposed improvements impact the existing
utilities, and shall either revise the design to avoid the conflicts or suggest alternatives. The
CONSULTANT shall also indicate required adjustments/relocations and revise the cost estimate to
reflect the adjustments/relocations.
Deliverables:
• Survey of pothole locations
Packet Page 187 of 532
Supplement No. 4
Exhibit E 1: Consultant Fee Determination Fixed Fee
Five Corners Roundabout Intersection Improvement Project
City of Edmonds
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Direct
Classification Rate Hours Cost
1 Project Manager (PMGR)57.00$ 28 $1,596
2 Principal In Charge (PICH)69.00$ 2 $138
3 Managing Professional Engr/QC (MGPE)57.00$ 10 $570
4 Professional Engineer (PFEN)42.00$ 86 $3,612
5 Sr. CADD Technician (SCAD)32.50$ 14 $455
6 Prof. Land Surveyor (PLSU)36.00$ 2 $72
7 Survey Technician (SVTE)30.50$ 4 $122
8 Party Chief (PCHF)28.00$ 10 $280
9 Instrument Person (INST)24.00$ 10 $240
10 Administrative Assistant (ADMA)26.75$ 6 $161
11 Exec. Administrator (EXAD)31.00$ 2 $62
Total Hours 174
Salary Cost $7,308
Overhead Cost @ 184.46%of Direct Labor $13,479
Net Fee @ 28.00%of Direct Labor $2,046
Total Overhead & Net Fee Cost $15,526
Direct Expenses Unit Each No.Cost
Reproduction: Reports reports @ $15 /report 0 $0
Reproduction: Plan Sets sets @ $10 /set 0 $0
Mail/Deliveries/Fed Ex @ $20 0 $0
Mileage miles @ $0.555 /mile 280 $155
High Definition Scanning Equip.days @ $520 /day 0 $0
APS (6 Potholes)$4,000
Subtotal $4,155
David Evans and Associates Total $26,988
P:\c\COED00000003\0000CON\0030Contract\Supplements\Supplement 4 A Joint Utility Trench\Exhibit EA1_DEA Budget_Five Corners_2012A1004.xls
Page 1 of 2
Printed: 10/4/2012Packet Page 188 of 532
Exhibit E 1 Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
Five Corners Roundabout Intersection Improvement Project
City of Edmonds
David Evans and Associates, Inc.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Work
Element #Work Element Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
(
P
M
G
R
)
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
I
n
C
h
a
r
g
e
(
P
I
C
H
)
Ma
n
a
g
i
n
g
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
En
g
r
/
Q
C
(
M
G
P
E
)
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
(
P
F
E
N
)
Sr
.
C
A
D
D
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
(
S
C
A
D
)
Pr
o
f
.
L
a
n
d
S
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
(
P
L
S
U
)
Su
r
v
e
y
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
(
S
V
T
E
)
Pa
r
t
y
C
h
i
e
f
(
P
C
H
F
)
In
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
P
e
r
s
o
n
(
I
N
S
T
)
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
(A
D
M
A
)
Ex
e
c
.
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
(
E
X
A
D
)
DEA DEA
direct rates:$57.00 $69.00 $57.00 $42.00 $32.50 $36.00 $30.50 $28.00 $24.00 $26.75 $31.00 Total ALL
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total $
hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs ALL
7.0 Utility Coordination
7.1 Utility Coordination
7.2 Utility Conflict Resolution
7.2a Joint Utility Trench Plan 8 2 4 60 10 2 2 88 $11,819
7.2b Joint Utility Trench Cost Estimate 4 2 12 18 $2,643
7.2c Joint Utility Trench Special Provisions 12 2 2 4 20 $3,090
7.2d Potholing 4 2 12 4 2 4 10 10 48 $5,281
Work Element 7.0 Total 28 2 10 86 14 2 4 10 10 6 2 174 $22,833
Direct Expenses $4,155
PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS 28 2 10 86 14 2 4 10 10 6 2 174 $26,988
Supplement No. 4
P:\c\COED00000003\0000CON\0030Contract\Supplements\Supplement 4 A Joint Utility Trench\Exhibit EA1_DEA Budget_Five Corners_2012A1004.xls
Page 2 of 2
Printed: 10/4/2012
Packet Page 189 of 532
AM-5182 3. I.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Jerry Shuster Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Accept a stormwater pipe and associated appurtenances installed by a resident at 23005-108th Ave W.
and an associated easement.
Recommendation
Accept easement and stormwater pipe.
Previous Council Action
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval.
Narrative
From the late 1980s through the mid-1990s the City of Edmonds annexed several portions of
unincorporated Snohomish County in what is now known as Southwest Edmonds. With the annexation
came substandard stormwater infrastructure in parts of SW Edmonds.
Part of this substandard infrastructure included a stormwater system that drained runoff from a cul-de-sac
at 107th Pl. W. The runoff from this street went into a piped system northwest through one private
property (23002-107th Pl. W), down a steep hill through a second private property (23005-108th Ave W),
then through a third private property (10718- 229th Ave W) before connecting to the street system on
229th Ave W (See Exhibit 1). The pipe segment through the second property was broken and not
functioning. This was causing erosion of the steep slope at 23005 – 108th Ave W.
The City had repair of this pipe on its small works project “to do” list. The resident chose to install the
pipe themselves (plans approved by the City). The resident would now like to transfer the assets to the
City. A maintenance easement will also be obtained for the new pipe since the old pipe did not have an
easement.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 - Site Map
Exhibit 2 - Draft Easement & Asset Transfer Document
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/10/2012 03:04 PM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
Packet Page 190 of 532
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 11:57 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 191 of 532
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
"?B
Location of assets
229TH
10
8
T
H
10
7
T
H
23005
10800
23001
10705
23002
23006
23003
10624
23004
10620
23008
10718
10704
23005
22929
22915
10717
23007 10603
23022
10707 1062310631 10615
22905
23008
23006
23026
10703 23010
10608
22930
10601
10605
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
23129
No warranty of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchant abilityaccompany this product.
1 in = 75 ft
0 40 80 120 160 20020
Feet ®
Legend
"?B STORM_TYPEISTORM_LINEContour_10ft_smoothed
Packet Page 192 of 532
Return Address:
City Clerk
City of Edmonds
121 - 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, WA 98020
UTILITY EASEMENT AND ASSET TRANSFER
Property Address: 23005 108th Avenue SW
Assessor’s Property Tax Parcel No: 00554600000302
Grantors: Michael Harter and Ann Garnsey-Harter
Grantee: City of Edmonds
IN CONSIDERATION of the benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned,
MICHAEL HARTER and ANN GARNSEY-HARTER (“Grantors”) hereby grant to the CITY OF
EDMONDS, a Washington Municipal Corporation (“Grantee”), a permanent easement for the
installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of a storm
drainage line and necessary appurtenances over, across, through, and below the following described
property, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions thereon
interfering with the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or
replacement of said storm drainage line and necessary appurtenances, together with the right of access to
the easement at any time for the stated purpose.
The permanent utility easement hereby granted (“Utility Easement”) is located in the COUNTY OF
SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON, and has the following abbreviated legal description:
A 10-foot strip of land lying within that portion of Tract 3, Richmond Beach Garden Tracts.
The exact location of the Utility Easement on the subject property is depicted and more specifically
described in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
GRANTEE agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed
during the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of
said storm drainage line and necessary appurtenances, provided the Grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall
not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the Utility Easement.
FURTHER, WHEREAS Grantors have installed a stormwater pipe and appurtenances within the
area of the Utility Easement granted herein and wish to permanently transfer these assets to Grantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to accrue to the Grantors herein, Grantors
herby permanently convey to Grantee, and Grantee hereby accepts, all rights, title and interest of every
nature held by Grantors in said stormwater pipe and appurtenances located within the Utility Easement.
DATED this ________ day of ________________, 2012.
GRANTEE:
___________________________________
Dave Earling, Mayor
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________ ___________________________________
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney
Packet Page 193 of 532
GRANTORS:
____________________________________
Michael Harter
____________________________________
Ann Garnsey-Harter
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
On this day personally appeared before me Michael Harter, to me known to be the individual described
in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free
and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF , 2012
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the
State of Washington, residing at
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
On this day personally appeared before me Ann Garnsey-Harter, to me known to be the individual
described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that she signed the same as
her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF , 2012
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the
State of Washington, residing at
Packet Page 194 of 532
AM-5183 3. J.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Jerry Shuster Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Stormwater Billing Exemption Reconsideration
Recommendation
Revoke the stormwater fee exemption for the property at 24017 104th Ave W.
Previous Council Action
On October 3, 2006, City Council granted a stormwater billing exemption to a resident located at 24017
104th Ave W. The entire stormwater user fee was waived subject to a letter from the City containing a
provision that this may be reconsidered and/or adjusted at any time in the future (See Exhibit 1).
On September 11, 2012, the Finance Committee reviewed this item with staff.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval.
Narrative
An audit exception by the Washington State Auditor’s Office found that the exemption from paying
stormwater fees granted in 2006 was in violation of EMC 7.50.060(See highlighted portion of Exhibit 2).
Edmonds City Code Chapter 7.50.060 states that the City’s Public Works Director is authorized to make
adjustments to the City’s stormwater utility rates in an amount up to 50 percent of the rate. The code also
provides for an appeal process to the City Council on the Public Works Director’s decision. The City
Council’s decision shall be final (not appealable) and also specifies the maximum increase or decrease be
within 50 percent of the specified rate. The code does not authorize exemptions (waiver of the entire fee)
by the Public Works Director or City Council. The code describes the criteria for adjusting the rate that
involves either a reduction in the burden on the City’s storm system (that would warrant a decrease in fee)
or an increase in the burden on the City’s storm system (that would warrant a increase in fee).
Staff believes that the resident of 24017 104th Ave W. constructed a stormwater management system per
applicable the code in force at the time of the original permit and no special actions were taken to reduce
the burden on the City’s storm system. The property is located in an area where there is no City system to
connect into, therefore, the resident would not have the opportunity to either increase or decrease the
burden on the City system. Based on this analysis and the audit exception, the fee exemption should be
revoked and the property does not qualify for an administrative rate adjustment under 7.50.060. Recovery
Packet Page 195 of 532
of past fees is not recommended.
The Public Works Department will actively work to develop a policy for granting stormwater fee waivers
based on clearly defined criteria. This may also include a waiver of the stormwater General Facilities
Charge under ECC Chapter 7.50.070. This is a one-time fee when a parcel connects to the City’s storm
water system.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 - Granting Stormwater Exemption
Exhibit 2 - WA State Auditor's Audit Exception
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/10/2012 03:20 PM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:08 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 12:00 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 196 of 532
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
9
7
o
f
5
3
2
Page | 6
We recommend the City develop internal controls over public works projects to ensure that bid
requirements are met and projects are adequately monitored to further ensure appropriate use
of public funds.
Park Department – cash receipting
The Parks Department receipted $974,321 in 2010. During our review of cash receipting at the
Parks and Recreation Department, we found:
Multiple cashiers at the Frances Anderson Center work out of the same drawer. This
prevents the department from fixing responsibility in the event of a loss at the Center.
Keys to the cash drawers are attached to a bulletin board behind the counter at the
Frances Anderson Center. Therefore, everyone in the office has access to the keys and
cash drawers.
Yost Park Pool cashiers process credit card payments through the credit card terminal
but do not always enter them into the cash register.
We recommend the City establish controls to ensure that public resources are properly
safeguarded and that employees receive adequate training over cash receipting procedures.
Utility adjustments
A former Finance Director exempted a citizen from paying storm water charges. City Municipal
Code 7.50.060 states the public works director is authorized to make adjustments to storm
water management utility fees, but not provided for exemptions to be granted by finance
directors. The City has not billed this customer for five years, for a total amount of $592.75.
We recommend the City ensure that all exemptions and adjustment to utility fees are approved
in compliance with City Code.
Status of Prior Audit Recommendations
Prior Management Letter Items Resolved Unresolved
Municipal Court X
Prior Exit Items Resolved Unresolved
Police Department Citations X
Payroll contract with SNOCOM X
Davis Bacon monitoring *
Donations policy X
REET expenditures X
Cost allocations X
Packet Page 198 of 532
AM-5197 3. K.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted By:James Lawless
Department:Police Department
Committee: Public Safety, Personnel Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance amending sections of ECC 5.05 relating to Potentially Dangerous Dog definitions,
declarations, and appeals.
Recommendation
Staff and the City Attorney recommend forwarding the amendments to full Council for approval via
consent agenda.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
On July 25, 2012, Judge Doug Fair heard a motion to dismiss pertaining to a case involving the
declaration of a dog as "potentially dangerous." Serveral legal issues were brought forward regarding the
wording of the current ordinance, specifically dealing with the definition of "potentially dangerous dog",
as well as the establishment of parameters/standards for burden of proof and the appeal process. On
August 6, 2012, Judge Fair issued a ruling based upon the arguments presented by the
petitioner's counsel, finding that ECC 5.05.123(f) was facially unconstitutional.
Working in cooperation with both the City Prosecutor's Office and the City Attorney's Office, the
language contained in ECC 5.05.010, 5.05.121, & 5.05.123, addressing Potentially Dangerous Dog, as
well as the appeal processes, has been amended so as to pass judicial review and consitutional tests, as
well as to codify provisions of RCW 16.08 that are not in conflict with any portion of ECC 5.05.
On October 9, 2012, this item was presented to the Public Safety & Personnel Committee. It is the
recommendation of staff and the committee that the item be forwarded to full council via consent agenda
for approval of the changes recommended by both the City Attorney and City Prosecutor's offices.
Attachments
Karp Order
Ordinance Amending Dangerous Dog Provisions of ECC 5.05
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:06 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:51 AM
Packet Page 199 of 532
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:51 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: James Lawless Started On: 10/12/2012 08:49 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 200 of 532
Packet Page 201 of 532
Packet Page 202 of 532
- 1 -
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY
DANGEROUS DOG PROVISIONS OF ECC 5.05; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Municipal Court has determined that portions of the City of
Edmonds’ Animal Control regulations, ECC 5.05, relating to Dangerous Dogs and Potentially Dangerous
Dogs are unconstitutionally vague; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds wishes to revise ECC 5.05 to address the issues raised
by the Municipal Court; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. ECC 5.05 Animal Control is hereby amended to read as follows (deleted text
in strike-through; new text in underline):
5.05.010 Definitions.
…
M. “Potentially dangerous dog” means: (A) any dog that when unprovoked: (1) inflicts a
bite or bites on a human, pet or livestock or a domestic animal either on public or private
property; or (2) chases or approaches a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any other
public grounds or private property in a menacing fashion or apparent attitude of attack,;
or (B) any dog with a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked,
to cause injury or otherwise to threaten the safety of humans, pets or livestock on any
public or private property or domestic animals.
…
5.05.121 Potentially Dangerous dogs.
A. Declaration. Upon declaration by the animal control authority that a dog is a
potentially dangerous dog as defined in ECC 5.05.010, the owner shall be served with a
potentially dangerous dog declaration.
Packet Page 203 of 532
- 2 -
B. Declaration – Final Determination Unless Appealed. The service of a potentially
dangerous dog declaration shall, unless timely appealed, be a final determination that the
dog is a potentially dangerous dog.
C. Notice – Service. Service of the potentially dangerous dog declaration upon the owner
of the animal may be made either by personal service to the owner, by posting such
notice at the residence of the owner or by certified mail to the last known address of the
owner.
The provisions of this Section apply to the extent they are not inconsistent with the
provisions of Chapter 16.08 RCW.
A. Declaration of a Dog as Potentially Dangerous. The animal control authority shall
have the authority to declare a dog to be potentially dangerous, and place restrictions on
such dog, if the animal control authority has probable cause to believe that the dog falls
within the definitions set forth in Section 5.05.010(M). The declaration must be based
upon:
1. The written complaint of a citizen who is willing to testify that the animal has
acted in a manner which causes it to fall within the definition of Section 5.05.010(M);
2. Animal bite report(s) filed with the animal control authority;
3. Action(s) of the animal witnessed by any employee of the animal control
authority or law enforcement officer; or
4. Other substantial evidence.
B. Exclusions. A dog shall not be declared potentially dangerous if the animal control
authority determines, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the threat, injury, or bite
alleged to have been committed by the dog was sustained by a person who was at the
time committing a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner
of the dog, or who was tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog, or who had been in the
past observed or reported to have tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog, or who was
committing or attempting to commit a crime.
C. Prohibited Ownership. No person(s) under the age(s) of eighteen years old shall own
a potentially dangerous dog, as defined in Section 5.05.010(M.)
D. Notice of Animal Control Authority Declaration. If the animal control authority
receives a report of a potentially dangerous animal, it shall immediately initiate an
investigation including, but not limited to, interviewing the complainant(s), interviewing
the owner of the animal, if known, and observing the animal. Upon completion of its
investigation, if the animal is declared potentially dangerous, the animal control authority
shall prepare a written declaration.
1. The declaration shall be in writing and served on the owner in one of the
following methods:
a. certified and regular mail to the owner’s last known address; or
Packet Page 204 of 532
- 3 -
b. personally; or
c. If the owner cannot be located by one of the first two methods, by
publication in a newspaper of general circulation.
2. The declaration shall include, but is not limited to:
a. a description of the dog;
b. the name and address of the owner of the dog, if known;
c. the whereabouts of the dog if not in custody of the owner;
d. a brief summary of the facts upon which the declaration is based, if known,
including the definition of potentially dangerous under which the
declaration is being made;
e. a statement of any restrictions placed on the animal or owner as a result of
the declaration; and
f. the ability and process for appealing the declaration by submitting a written
request to the Edmonds municipal court clerk within five (5) business days
of receipt of the declaration.
DE. Appeal. An appeal of a potentially dangerous dog declaration must be served upon
the city of Edmonds police chief within five days of service of the potentially dangerous
dog declaration. Appeals shall be heard by the judge of the Edmonds municipal court and
conducted in accordance with ECC 5.05.123. [Ord. 3786 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3451 § 1, 2003].
5.05.122 Dangerous dogs.
The provisions of this Section apply to the extent they are not inconsistent with the
provisions of Chapter 16.08 RCW.
…
E. Appeal. An appeal of a dangerous dog declaration must be served upon the city of
Edmonds police chief within five days of service of the dangerous dog declaration.
Appeals shall be heard by the judge of the Edmonds municipal court and conducted in
accordance with ECC 5.05.123.
…
5.05.123 Appeal.
A. Filing. A notice of appeal, substantially in the form prescribed, shall be filed with the
Edmonds municipal court and the chief of police not more than five (5) business days
after service of the order to abate a nuisance, potentially dangerous dog declaration, or
dangerous dog declaration. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal shall constitute a
waiver of the right to appeal the determination of the order to abate a nuisance,
potentially dangerous dog declaration, or declaration of dangerous dog.
Packet Page 205 of 532
- 4 -
1. If the owner or keeper does not file a timely written request for hearing, the
restrictions imposed in connection with the declaration shall remain in effect for the
life of the animal, unless sooner lifted by action of the animal control authority or a
court of competent jurisdiction.
…
C. Scheduling of Hearing. Upon receipt of a timely filed notice of appeal, a hearing shall
be scheduled not more than 60 days from the date of the filing of the notice of appeal.
The clerk of the municipal court shall send Wwritten notice of the date of the hearing
shall be sent to the appellants at least 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. It shall
be the responsibility of the parties to notify witnesses of the hearing date. The failure of
the appellant to appear at the hearing shall result in a denial of the appeal and upholding
of the order to abate a nuisance, potentially dangerous dog declaration, or declaration of
dangerous dog.
…
E. Appointment of the Hearing Examiner. The judge of the Edmonds municipal court is
appointed as the hearing examiner. The judge may uphold, dismiss or modify the order
to abate a nuisance, potentially dangerous dog declaration, or declaration of dangerous
dog. A written order shall be prepared and signed by the judge.
EF. Presentation of Evidence. At the appeal hearing, the judge shall take evidence
relevant to the order to abate a nuisance, potentially dangerous dog declaration, or
dangerous dog declaration. Testimony may be provided in the form of a signed written
statement pursuant to RCW 9A.72.085. Otherwise, parties are responsible for
subpoenaing any witnesses they deem necessary to testify.
G. Burden of Proof and Standard of Review. At the appeal hearing before the hearing
examiner, the animal control authority shall have the burden of proving that the dog is
potentially dangerous or dangerous by a preponderance of the evidence.
H. Hearing Before Municipal Court Hearing Examiner. The owner of the dog may
present evidence in defense of the dog. The hearing examiner shall weigh the evidence
presented by both the animal control authority and the owner (if applicable), and shall
Packet Page 206 of 532
- 5 -
issue a written decision to the appealing animal owner and animal control authority that
either sustains or reverses the animal control authority’s declaration.
1. Upon sustaining or reversing the declaration, the hearing examiner shall notify the
non-prevailing party of the right to appeal the hearing examiner’s decision.
2. If the declaration is reversed and an appeal is not timely filed by the animal control
authority, any previously imposed restrictions on the dog shall be annulled.
FI. Decision of the Court. The judge of the Edmonds municipal court may uphold,
dismiss, or modify the order to abate a nuisance, potentially dangerous dog declaration,
or declaration of dangerous dog. A written order shall be prepared and signed by the
judge. The decision of the judge of the Edmonds municipal court shall be a final
administrative decision appealable to the Snohomish County superior court within 30
days of the final written order.
J. Notification of Status, Change of Ownership, Custody and/or Residence. The owner
of a potentially dangerous dog or dangerous dog shall notify the animal control authority,
immediately upon discovery of such circumstances, when the dog is loose or unconfined
off the owner’s property; or has bitten or injured a human being, pet or livestock; or is
sold or given away or dies. If the owner moves such dog to another address or otherwise
transfers the dog to the ownership, custody, or residence of another individual, the owner
shall, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the change, inform the animal control
authority in writing of the name, address and telephone number of the new owner and/or
the address of the new residence where the dog is located. Such notice shall include the
name, description and license number of the dog.
1. In the event the ownership and/or custody of the dog changes, the owner shall notify
the new owner in writing of the details of the dog’s record relating to being declared
potentially dangerous or dangerous and the terms and conditions of the declaration.
2. The owner shall also provide the animal control authority with a copy of the written
notification, which shall contain a notarized statement by the new owner acknowledging
receipt of the notification.
[Ord. 3786 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3451 § 1, 2003].
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
Packet Page 207 of 532
- 6 -
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFFREY B. TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 208 of 532
- 7 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2012, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE DANGEROUS DOG AND POTENTIALLY
DANGEROUS DOG PROVISIONS OF ECC 5.05; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2012.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 209 of 532
AM-5187 3. L.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Department:Planning
Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Approve for
Consent Agenda
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of an Ordinance establishing an Historic Preservation Gift Fund.
Recommendation
Approve the draft ordinance (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
The Council's Finance Committee reviewed this item during its October 9, 2012 meeting and
recommended full Council adoption on the consent agenda.
Narrative
The Historic Preservation Commission is a voluntary citizen commission with no dedicated funding in
the city's budget. To help fund its activities supporting historic preservation in the community, the
Commission desires to solicit donations -- similar to what is done for donations supporting arts activities.
To assure that donations are used for the purposes proposed, and to enable donators to potentially be able
to access tax benefits (subject to their own determination of whether their donation is eligible for any tax
benefit -- the city would not make this determination or representation) for their donation, it is desired to
set up a special account within the city. The draft ordinance has been prepared to establish a "Historic
Preservation Gift Fund" for these purposes.
The Commission hopes to have the fund established as soon as possible so that they can begin soliciting
donations for their 2013 calendar, which is ready for production this month.
Attachments
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/10/2012 03:17 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/11/2012 08:34 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 11:10 AM
Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 10/10/2012 02:44 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/11/2012
Packet Page 210 of 532
Packet Page 211 of 532
- 1 -
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN HISTORIC
PRESERVATION GIFT FUND TO ENCUMBER FUNDS FOR
THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City Council is a Certified Local Government for historic
preservation and has an established historic preservation program; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission undertakes a
number of activities designed to further the goals of the city’s historic preservation program; and
WHEREAS, the City’s budget does not directly provide funding for historic
preservation activities, except by providing limited staff support; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to provide a mechanism to enable
and accept public donations to help support the City’s historic preservation program and the
activities of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission; NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 3, Revenue and Finance, of the Edmonds City Code is hereby
amended by the addition of a new Chapter 3.17 to read as follows:
Packet Page 212 of 532
- 2 -
Chapter 3.17
Historic Preservation Gift Fund
Sections:
3.17.010 Historic Preservation Gift Fund
3.17.020 Administration of the Fund
3.17.010 Historic Preservation Gift Fund
The Finance Director is hereby authorized to create and number a new fund to be
known as the “Historic Preservation Gift Fund” for the purpose of receiving
donations from the city’s citizens or from any interested party for, or in aid of, the
cost of promoting or supporting the city’s historic preservation programs and the
activities of its Historic Preservation Commission. This fund is created and shall
be maintained with the intent that such donations shall be potentially tax
deductible and in accordance with the laws of the United States and the
regulations of the Internal Revenue Service.
3.17.020 Administration of the fund.
The council shall utilize the principal and interest earned by the fund for the
purposes specified in Chapter 3.17.010.
Section 2. The Finance Director is authorized to direct such funds to the Historic
Preservation Gift Fund and to segregate them therein in accordance with the limitations
established by the Washington State Auditor.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 213 of 532
- 3 -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 214 of 532
- 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2012, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING AN HISTORIC
PRESERVATION GIFT FUND TO ENCUMBER FUNDS FOR
THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2012.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 215 of 532
AM-5143 4.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:5 Minutes
Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn
LaFave
Department:Mayor's Office
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in honor of Friends of the Edmonds Library Week, October 21-27, 2012.
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The Friends of the Library (FEL) are a community-based group of citizens who promote, encourage, and
enhance the work of our local library. This year they will hold their 32nd annual book sale to benefit the
Edmonds Library on Saturday, October 27, 2012 from 9 am - 4 pm at the Frances Anderson Center.
Accepting the proclamation on behalf of the FEL is Judith Works, FEL president. In attendance is Lesly
Kaplan, Library Manager, along with board members, members and supporters of the FEL.
Attachments
FEL_proclamation
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 09/27/2012 11:03 AM
Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 09/25/2012 09:00 AM
Final Approval Date: 09/27/2012
Packet Page 216 of 532
Packet Page 217 of 532
AM-5196 5.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted For:Shawn Hunstock Submitted By:Shawn
Hunstock
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Presentation of 2013 Proposed Budget
Recommendation
N.A. For discussion purposes only at this meeting.
Previous Council Action
N.A.
Narrative
Finance Director Shawn Hunstock will present the 2013 Proposed Budget, give a brief overview of
fund-level revenue and expenditures, and will be available to answer high level questions from Council
members.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 04:17 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:51 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: Shawn Hunstock Started On: 10/11/2012 04:03 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 218 of 532
AM-5195 6.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:45 Minutes
Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Robert
English
Department:Engineering
Review Committee: Planning/Parks/Public Works Committee Action: Recommend
Review by
Full Council
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan Element update for 2013-2018 to the city's Comprehensive
Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The proposal updates the city's Capital Facilities Plan to include
improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of city infrastructure such as transportation, parks, and
stormwater along with other public faciilties necessary to implement the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation
Approve both documents.
Previous Council Action
On September 11, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be presented to Council for discussion.
On October 2, 2012, the proposed 2013-2018 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program
were presented to the Council for review and discussion.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six-year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
The proposed CFP and CIP were presented and a public hearing was held at the Planning Board
meeting on October 10, 2012. The Planning Board recommended the CFP and CIP be forwarded to the
City Council for approval. The draft minutes from the Planning Board meeting are attached as Exhibit
4.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
Packet Page 219 of 532
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are
restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The 2013-2018 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of General,
Transportation and Stormwater. The 2013-2018 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP has two sections
related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's financial fund
numbers. Exhibit 3 is a comparison that shows added, deleted and changed projects between last year's
CFP/CIP to the proposed CFP/CIP.
Attachments
Exhibit 1: CFP 2013-2018
Exhibit 2: CIP 2013-2018
Exhibit 3: CFP-CIP Comparison
Exhibit 4: 10-10-12 Draft Planning Board Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/11/2012 04:28 PM
Public Works Phil Williams 10/12/2012 09:18 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:19 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:52 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 10/11/2012 03:51 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 220 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT
2013-2018
1Packet Page 221 of 532
2Packet Page 222 of 532
CFP
GENERAL
3Packet Page 223 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Pa
r
k
s
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
a
nd
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
)
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
$0 $0
To
t
a
l
$5
-
$
2
3
M
$0
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
$0
RE
E
T
$0
To
t
a
l
$5
M
$0
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
$0 $0
To
t
a
l
$5
M
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
RE
E
T
1
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
$0 $0
To
t
a
l
Un
k
n
o
w
n
$0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
/
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
Ci
t
y
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
$0 $0
To
t
a
l
Un
k
n
o
w
n
$0
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
1
,
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
RE
E
T
2
$1
5
5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Sc
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
5
5
,
0
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
-
8
M
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
$0 $0
To
t
a
l
$3
-
$
4
M
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
$0
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
$0
To
t
a
l
$4
-
1
0
M
EI
S
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
US
D
O
T
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
$
0
St
a
t
e
F
u
n
d
s
$3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Un
k
n
o
w
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
$5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$1
1
,
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
A
nn
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$1
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
M
a
r
k
e
t
(
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
on
t
)
Ac
q
u
i
r
e
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
o
r
a
ye
a
r
r
o
u
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
m
a
r
k
e
t
.
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
20
1
8
20
1
5
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
20
1
7
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
/
A
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
-
Ol
d
W
o
o
d
w
a
y
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
In
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
E
S
D
#
1
5
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
co
m
p
l
e
x
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
W
S
D
O
T
F
e
r
r
y
/
M
u
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
Re
l
o
c
a
t
e
f
e
r
r
y
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
t
o
M
a
r
i
n
a
Be
a
c
h
.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
/
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
.
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Re
p
l
a
c
e
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
.
Pa
r
k
s
&
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
i
n
t
en
a
n
c
e
&
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
/
S
n
o
-
I
s
l
e
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
Ex
p
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
S
n
o
-
I
s
l
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
)
.
20
1
6
Ar
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
/
A
r
t
M
u
s
e
u
m
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
r
t
'
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(C
i
t
y
h
a
s
l
e
a
s
e
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
/
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
(C
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
s
u
b
l
e
a
s
e
d
o
n
C
i
v
i
c
Pl
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
.
Bo
y
s
&
G
i
r
l
s
C
l
u
b
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
a
t
Y
o
s
t
P
a
r
k
Me
e
t
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
n
e
e
d
s
f
o
r
a
n
A
q
u
a
t
i
c
s
Ce
n
t
e
r
(
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
9
)
.
Ci
v
i
c
P
l
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Si
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
8
-
3
1
-
1
2
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
_
C
F
P
9/
2
7
/
2
0
1
2
4Packet Page 224 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Center
at Yost Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 –
$23,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5m - $23m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
5Packet Page 225 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Art Center / Art Museum ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A new Art Center/Museum facility will provide and promote
Cultural / Arts facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts
facilities is a high priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001
and in the 2008 update process.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for
public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority
creates the need to determine feasibility for and potentially construct new visual arts related
facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
6Packet Page 226 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Boys & Girls Club Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build new Boys & Girls Club facility to accommodate the growing
and changing needs of this important club.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Boys & Girls Club was constructed as a field
house by the Edmonds School District decades ago and is in need of major renovation or
replacement. It is inadequate in terms of ADA accessibility and does not meet the needs of a
modern club.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
7Packet Page 227 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Playfield Acquisition
and/or Development
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5M
6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire or work with the School District to develop this 8.1 acre
property for continued use as an important community park, sports tourism hub and site of
some of Edmonds largest and most popular special events in downtown Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Gain tenure and control in perpetuity over this important
park site for the citizens of Edmonds.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL Unknown
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
8Packet Page 228 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds/Sno-Isle Library ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand building/parking to accommodate additional library needs
and programs. Library improvements identified in Sno-Isle Libraries Capital Facility Plan:
2007-2025
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements will better serve citizens needs requiring
additional space and more sophisticated technology.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL Unknown
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
9Packet Page 229 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,000,000-
$8,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop regional community park and fully lighted multi-field athletic
complex in partnership with Edmonds School District. Development contingent upon successful
partnerships, grants, and regional capital campaign.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Currently underutilized and under maintained facility with
great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt,
parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000
residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study $155,000 $2,200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $155,000 $2,200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $6m - $8m
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
10Packet Page 230 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities
Maintenance & Operations Building
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $3m - $4m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
11Packet Page 231 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4 – 10 mil.
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace and enlarge deteriorating Senior Center building
complex on the City waterfront.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This facility is at the end of its useful life. The floors
are continuing to settle which poses significant renovation costs. In addition, the facility
requires structural reinforcement to withstand a major earthquake.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on procuring the necessary funding from grants and other
sources.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $4m -$10m
12Packet Page 232 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing
WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
PROJECT 1A-Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will
provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting
various forms of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between
existing and planned transportation modes.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-
2025
Engineering &
Administration
Right of Way
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL Unknown
PROJECT 1B-Main Street Undercrossing (Minimum Build Version)
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ferry commuters currently have to cross the railroad tracks,
creating safety concerns due to the high train traffic. With the potential increase in train traffic
with the coal trains, an underpass would significantly improve the safety at the crossing.
Emergency vehicles have no way of accessing the west side of the railroad tracks when a train
is going across. (New project, not included in 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve safety at the railroad crossing, reduce delay for
the ferry system, and allow access for emergency vehicles to the west side of the railroad tracks
when a train is crossing Main St.
SCHEDULE: Feasibility study is scheduled for 2016 (pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-
2025
Planning/Study $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Engineering &
Administration
$15 Million
Construction $42 Million
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $57 Million
13Packet Page 233 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project 1A
Project 1B
14Packet Page 234 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown
Waterfront)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public
market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community
gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a
valuable asset to Edmonds.
SCHEDULE:
This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners
willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished
by 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5m
15Packet Page 235 of 532
16Packet Page 236 of 532
CFP
TRANSPORTATION
17Packet Page 237 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Sa
f
e
t
y
/
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
$2
,
2
7
1
,
8
4
2
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
2
,
2
7
1
,
8
4
2
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
De
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$8
6
2
,
3
5
8
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$
8
6
2
,
3
5
8
$3
,
1
3
4
,
2
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
,
1
3
4
,
2
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$8
7
9
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$8
7
9
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
4
2
7
,
5
1
2
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
8
9
,
9
4
2
$
4
0
9
,
5
7
0
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$2
2
6
,
7
0
8
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
6
,
7
0
8
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
4
,
7
8
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
0
,
8
5
8
$
6
3
,
9
2
2
$2
,
7
7
9
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
4
5
0
,
8
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
2
0
0
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
$4
,
5
1
1
,
7
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
1
9
,
7
0
0
$
3
,
7
9
2
,
0
0
0
$2
8
1
,
5
2
5
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
8
1
,
5
2
5
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$4
,
7
9
3
,
2
2
5
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
1
9
,
7
0
0
$
4
,
0
7
3
,
5
2
5
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
22
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
de
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
a
n
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
Re
a
l
i
g
n
h
i
g
h
l
y
s
k
e
w
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
c
r
e
a
t
e
n
e
w
e
a
s
t
-
w
e
s
t
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
9
9
a
n
d
I
-
5
.
22
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
E
B
l
a
n
e
a
n
d
a
d
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
/
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
v
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
N
B
a
n
d
SB
L
T
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
de
l
a
y
.
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
5
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
21
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
@
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
(
5
Co
r
n
e
r
s
)
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
76
t
h
A
v
.
W
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
b
y
co
n
v
e
r
t
i
n
g
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
(
2
)
l
a
n
e
s
f
o
r
bo
t
h
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
r
e
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
LO
S
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
y
st
o
p
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
N
B
an
d
S
B
t
o
a
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
\
C
F
P
\
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
1
0
-
5
-
1
2
10
/
5
/
2
0
1
2
18Packet Page 238 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
5
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
2
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
2
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
2
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
,
2
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(Fe
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
,
9
3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$3
,
9
3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
,
0
7
9
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
6
,
0
0
0
$2
,
6
6
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$4
,
0
7
9
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
6
6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$9
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$9
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
Wi
d
e
n
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
a
d
d
a
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
f
o
r
2
0
0
'
st
o
r
a
g e
l
e
n
g th
a
n
d
a
n
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
l
e
f
t
tu
r
n
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Co
n
v
e
r
t
a
l
l
-
w
a
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
In
s
t
a
l
l
t
w
o
-
w
a
y
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
al
o
n
g
t
h
i
s
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
(
5
0
/
5
0
s
p
l
i
t
w
i
t
h
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
;
t
o
t
a
l
c
o
s
t
:
~
2
0
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
)
.
Wi
d
e
n
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
a
d
d
a
2
n
d
WB
L
T
l
a
n
e
/
w
i
d
e
n
S
R
-
9
9
t
o
a
d
d
a
2n
d
L
T
l
a
n
e
.
84
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
(
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
2
3
8
t
h
St
.
S
W
)
Hw
y
.
9
9
@
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Hw
y
9
9
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
n
v
e
r
t
a
l
l
-
w
a
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
@
1
7
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
LO
S
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ca
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
\
C
F
P
\
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
1
0
-
5
-
1
2
10
/
5
/
2
0
1
2
19Packet Page 239 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
5
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
$1
9
0
,
3
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
9
0
,
3
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
9
,
7
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$2
9
,
7
0
0
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
7
7
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$7
7
7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
"
S
a
f
e
$
4
1
7
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
7
,
0
0
0
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
"
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Gr
a
n
t
$
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$4
1
7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
7
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
T
I
B
/
$
1
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$8
8
,
0
0
0
$
9
9
7
,
0
0
0
RC
O
G
r
a
n
t
P
r
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
9
9
7
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Da
y to
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
.
t
o
Ca
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
,
f
a
c
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
.
23
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
(
S
R
-
10
4
)
t
o
M
a
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
l
o
n
g
23
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
,
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
s
a
f
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
10
4
a
n
d
M
a
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
r
o
u
t
e
t
o
Se
v
i
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
a
n
d
n
e
a
r
b
y
pa
r
k
s
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
Av
e
.
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
80
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
f
r
o
m
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
N
o
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
sa
f
e
t
y
o
n
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
5
t
h
a
n
d
6t
h
a
l
o
n
g
w
/
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
al
o
n
g
t
h
a
t
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
2n
d
A
v
e
.
S
f
r
o
m
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
t
o
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
\
C
F
P
\
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
1
0
-
5
-
1
2
10
/
5
/
2
0
1
2
20Packet Page 240 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
5
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
3
9
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
3
3
8
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
7
7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$5
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
"
S
a
f
e
$
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
"
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Gr
a
n
t
$
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$4
3
6
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
,
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
18
9
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
t
o
78
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
t
o
S
R
-
5
2
4
/
19
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
(
e
x
.
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
:
r
o
l
l
e
d
c
u
r
b
/
u
n
s
a
f
e
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
a
l
o
n
g
a
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
w
i
t
h
h
i
g
h
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
.
4t
h
A
v
e
.
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
r
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
r
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
l
o
n
g
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
t
o
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
.
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
t
o
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
SW
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
t
o
ex
.
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
(M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
)
.
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
f
r
o
m
7
6
t
h
Av
e
.
W
t
o
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
li
n
k
.
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
\
C
F
P
\
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
1
0
-
5
-
1
2
10
/
5
/
2
0
1
2
21Packet Page 241 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
5
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
20
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
"
S
a
f
e
$3
7
1
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
"
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Gr
a
n
t
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$3
7
1
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$2
6
,
3
6
1
,
4
2
5
An
n
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$
4
,
6
5
7
,
7
0
0
$
6
,
4
1
1
,
7
2
5
$
3
,
5
8
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
9
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
4
1
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
8
0
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
,
0
9
7
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
So
u
r
c
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
-
2
0
2
5
$9
,
4
0
1
,
3
5
4
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
,
5
7
1
,
7
8
4
$
4
,
2
0
1
,
5
7
0
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
5
,
2
7
8
,
2
3
3
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
3
6
,
2
3
3
$
1
,
9
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
3
9
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
3
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
3
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
0
3
,
0
0
0
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
$0
$0
$0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
,
0
9
7
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
4
6
,
8
3
8
Lo
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
$9
6
2
,
9
1
6
$
7
3
,
9
2
2
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
b
y
Y
e
a
r
84
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
an
d
1
8
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
th
o
s
e
(
2
)
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
H
w
y
.
9
9
t
o
7
6
t
h
Av
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
m
i
n
o
r
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Ca
l
m
i
n
g
To
a
s
s
i
s
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
re
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
is
s
u
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
s
p
e
e
d
i
n
g
,
c
u
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
15
t
h
S
t
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
t
o
8t
h
A
v
e
S
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
\
C
F
P
\
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
_
1
0
-
5
-
1
2
10
/
5
/
2
0
1
2
22Packet Page 242 of 532
PROJECT NAME: 212th St. SW @ 84th Ave.
W (5-Corners) Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,604,260
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The intersection of 84th Ave and 212th is 5 legged, which also
includes Main Street and Bowdoin Way approaches. The intersection is stop-controlled for all
approaches. A roundabout would be constructed and yield signs placed at each approach.
Installation will require the acquisition of right of way adjacent to the intersection. (ROADWAY
ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #6).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection currently functions at LOS F and delays
during the PM peak hour will worsen over time. A roundabout will improve the LOS and reduce
the need for vehicles to stop during low volume periods, improving the LOS to B.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for all project phases. Construction is scheduled for
completion in 2013.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$332,690
Construction $2,798,730
1% for Art $2,880
TOTAL $3,134,300
23Packet Page 243 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196th St. SW)/ 88th
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $879,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave.
W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and
southbound traffic to right-turn-only (prohibiting left-turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be
implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are
met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in
2009 Transportation Plan: #8).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St.
SW.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2016 – 2017 and construction in 2018 (must meet an
MUTCD traffic signal warrant and get WSDOT approval such 196th St. SW is a State Route).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$100,000 $163,000
Construction $616,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $100,000 $163,000 $616,000
24Packet Page 244 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9th Ave. S
(interim solution)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a mini-roundabout or re-striping of 9th Ave. with the
removal of parking on both sides of the street. (not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan
project priority chart)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and
the existing intersection LOS is E (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D). The re-
striping of 9th Ave. would improve the LOS to C or B with the installation of a mini-roundabout.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$500
Construction $9,500
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000
25Packet Page 245 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 76th Ave W @ 212th St. SW
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,923,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left-turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected-permissive phasing. Add a right-
turn lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. (ROADWAY ROJECT
PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #3).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service from LOS D (LOS F by 2015) to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for the design and a portion of the right of way phases.
Design started in 2012 and is scheduled for completion in 2015, along with the right-of-way phase.
Construction is scheduled for 2015 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$450,800 $700,200 $20,000
Construction $1,608,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $450,800 $700,200 $1,628,000
26Packet Page 246 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $173,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected-permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan:
#11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
LOS would be improved from LOS E to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and construction scheduled for 2017 (unsecured funding).
* All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $138,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $173,000
27Packet Page 247 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228th St. SW Corridor
Safety Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,296,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 228th St across the unopened right-of-way to 76th Avenue West 2)
Signalize the intersection of 228th St SW @ SR99 and 228th St. SW @ 76th Ave. West 3) Construct a raised
median in the vicinity of 76th Avenue West. 4) Add illumination between 224th St SW and 228th St SW on SR 99
5) Overlay of 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to ~ 2,000’ east of 76th Ave. W. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in
2009 Transportation Plan: #1).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will improve access / safety to the I-5 / Mountlake
Terrace Park & Ride from SR99. This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two east-
west corridors (220th Street SW and SR104). Roadway safety will also be improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW
will become a signalized intersection. The accident-prone left turns from SR99 to 76th Ave. W. will be restricted
with the addition of a raised center island.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and ROW acquisition scheduled for completion by 2014. Construction scheduled to
start in 2014. In 2010, federal grant was secured for the completion of design and ROW acquisition. In 2012, a
federal grant was secured for construction.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration, and
ROW
$719,700 $255,275
Construction $3,818,000
1% for Art *
TOTAL $719,700 $4,073,275
* All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
28Packet Page 248 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave.
W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
$1,431,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #9).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. By
2015, the Level of Service will be F, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D).
The improvement would modify the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$286,000
Construction $1,145,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,431,000
29Packet Page 249 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Caspers St. @ 9th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,022,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop-
controlled only for the northbound movement, on 9th Ave. N. (ROADWAY ROJECT
PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #12).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay as vehicles going
northbound on 9th Ave. N are having difficulty accessing Caspers St.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$204,000
Construction $818,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,022,000
30Packet Page 250 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW
to 238th St. SW)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,422,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #11 in the Long Walkway list
of the 2009 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along
this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with
their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any
back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since
half the project is in Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$2,042,000
Construction $8,169,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,211,000
31Packet Page 251 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW
intersection improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,932,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for
325’ storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275’ storage
length. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #10).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection delay from 72 seconds (w/o
improvement) to 62 seconds (w/ improvement) in 2015.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$786,000
Construction $3,146,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $3,932,000
32Packet Page 252 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW
intersection improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,079,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane
for 200’ storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300’ storage length.
Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound
movements.(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #13)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce
delay.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2016 and 2018.
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$490,000 $926,000
Construction $2,663,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $490,000 $926,000 $2,663,000
33Packet Page 253 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174th Ave.
W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $906,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane
for 50’ storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration
lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce
intersection delay. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #17)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$180,000
Construction $726,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $906,000
34Packet Page 254 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St. @ 9th Ave
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop
controlled for all approaches. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation
Plan: #2)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service, which is currently LOS
E (below City’s Level of Service standards: LOS D), to LOS B (w/ improvement).
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$220,000
Construction $873,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,093,000
35Packet Page 255 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. @ 9th Ave.
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop
controlled for all approaches. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation
Plan: #7).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service, which is currently LOS
E (below City’s Level of Service standards: LOS D), to LOS A.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$220,000
Construction $873,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,093,000
36Packet Page 256 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St. Pedestrian Lighting
from 5th Ave. to 6th Ave.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
$1,714,600
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of installing (16) historic style decorative
light poles along this block (8 on the south side and 8 on the north side), (4) decorative
poles with artist made elements at the top of the pole (2 on both sides), and inlaid street
names at the intersection corners. The visual character of this location will be further
enhanced as each new pole will have a planter basket for summer flowers. New sidewalk
and curb gutter will be installed along both sides of this stretch (total length: approximately
1,200'), to improve pedestrian safety and remove the sidewalk humps and cracks. New
ADA curb ramps or truncated domes will be installed at all non-compliant curb ramps.
(New project, not included in 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Increase pedestrian safety and activity along the
Downtown Retail Core.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for the design and construction of this project.
Construction will be completed by 2013.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $220,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $220,000
37Packet Page 257 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 80th Ave W from 188th St
SW to Olympic View Dr. Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $777,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct Walkway on 80th Ave West between 188th St SW
and 180th St SW and on 180th St SW between 80th Ave W and Olympic View Drive
(ranked #6 in Long Walkway list in 2009 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provides safe pedestrian access between Seaview
Park, connecting to Olympic View Drive Walkway and Southwest County Park. Would
create an additional safe walking route for kids attending Seaview Elementary School
(188th St. SW).
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2016 and 2017 and construction for 2018
(unsecured funding for all phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000 $100,000
Construction $647,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000 $100,000 $647,000
38Packet Page 258 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 236th St. SW from
Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $417,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a walkway on the south side of 236th St. SW
from SR 104 to Madrona Elementary. (This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project,
which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
The current pedestrian conditions are unsafe near Madrona Elementary School and
along 236th St. SW because of the limited sight distance issues (curvature of the
roadway).
SCHEDULE: Engineering is scheduled to begin in 2013 and construction completed
by 2015. A Safe Routes to School grant application was submitted in Spring ’12 to fund
the design and construction phases. A response is scheduled for Spring ‘13.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$65,000
Construction $55,000 $297,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $120,000 $297,000
39Packet Page 259 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S from James St.
to Main St. Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $32,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 100’) on 2nd Ave. S
between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #1 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $32,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $32,000
40Packet Page 260 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maple St. from 7th Ave.
S to 8th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $63,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 250’) on Maple St.
between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2016 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $53,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $63,000
41Packet Page 261 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St between 7th Ave.
S and 8th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $79,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 250’) on Dayton St.
between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2016 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $69,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $79,000
42Packet Page 262 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway
from Bell St to Caspers St.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,114,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a sidewalk on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront. (recent project, not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Design is scheduled in 2013 and construction in 2014 (pending grant funding;
RCO and TIB grant application submitted earlier this year and response scheduled for the
end of this year).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$88,000 $96,000
Construction $901,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $88,000 $997,000
43Packet Page 263 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway
from Main St. to 200th St. SW
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $677,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct Walkway on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW
(~ 2,700’). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to
Maplewood Elementary School (rated #2 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation
Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non-motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2017 (project is dependent on obtaining a grant, such
as the “Safe Routes to School”).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$127,000
Construction $550,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $127,000 $550,000
44Packet Page 264 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Beach Rd.
Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $950,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a walkway on Meadowdale Beach Dr. between 76th
Ave. W and Olympic View Dr. (~3,800’). This is one of the last collectors in the City with no
sidewalk on either side of the street (ranked #4 in Long Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route
connecting a minor arterial w/ high pedestrian activity (Olympic View Dr.) to a collector with
sidewalk on the east side of the street (76th Ave. W). Meadowdale Elementary School is
directly north of the project on Olympic View Dr.
SCHEDULE: Design scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding / pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 - 2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$190,000
Construction $760,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $190,000 $760,000
45Packet Page 265 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 3rd Ave. S to 4th
Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $220,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 350’) on Walnut
St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4th Ave. S (ranked #5 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2016 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$20,000
Construction $200,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $220,000
46Packet Page 266 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 6th Ave. S to 7th
Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $110,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 700’) on Walnut St.
between 6th Ave. S and 7th Ave. S (ranked #4 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $100,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $110,000
47Packet Page 267 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 4th Ave Corridor
Enhancement
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,700,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Corridor improvements along 4th Avenue to build on concept plan
developed in the Streetscape Plan update (2006). (Project not included in 2009 Transportation
Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center
for the Arts. Timing for design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area &
will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the project
implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2014 - 2015 (pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $25,000
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000 $1,150,000
Construction $1,425,000 $2,900,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $25,000 $200,000 $1,150,000 $1,425,000 $2,900,000
48Packet Page 268 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from 100th
Ave. W to 104th Ave. W
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $436,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW from
100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W. (ranked #8 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation
Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating
safe pedestrian connection between 100th Ave. W and 104th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE Engineering is scheduled to begin in 2013 and construction completed by 2015. A
Safe Routes to School grant application was submitted in Spring ’12 to fund the design and
construction phases. A response is scheduled for Spring ‘13.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$138,000
Construction $50,000 $248,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $188,000 $248,000
49Packet Page 269 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic Ave. from Main St.
to SR-524 / 196th St. SW Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
$1,249,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #3 in Long Walkway project list in 2009 Transportation
Plan. Install new sidewalk on the east side of the street. The ex. sidewalk is unsafe because
of rolled curb. (ranked #3 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and
create safe pedestrian access to Yost Park and Edmonds Elementary.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction $1,049,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,249,000
50Packet Page 270 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 189th Pl. W from 80th Ave. W
to 78th Ave. W Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked # 7 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on either side of the street.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and create
connection to ex. sidewalk on 189th Pl. W. This missing link will create a pedestrian connection
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $140,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $175,000
51Packet Page 271 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W between 188th St.
SW and 186th St. SW Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $140,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $175,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on the east side of the street to connect to the existing sidewalk to the south.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch, such as
school kids walking to Seaview Elementary.
52Packet Page 272 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
76th Ave. W Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,050,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Long Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating
safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2019 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$210,000
Construction $840,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,050,000
53Packet Page 273 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Residential Neighborhood
Traffic Calming
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Varies
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The traffic calming program is designed to assist residents and City
staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut-through traffic and
safety.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Allows traffic concerns to be addressed consistently and
traffic calming measures to be efficiently developed and put into operations.
SCHEDULE: annual program
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Construction $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
54Packet Page 274 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 15th St. SW from Edmonds
Way to 8th Ave. S
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $371,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk on 15th St. SW from
Edmonds Way to 8th Ave. S. (new project, not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route for kids
attending Sherwood Elementary.
SCHEDULE: Engineering is scheduled to begin in 2013 and construction completed by
2015. A Safe Routes to School grant application was submitted in Spring ’12 to fund the
design and construction phases. A response is scheduled for Spring ‘13.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$123,000
Construction $248,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $123,000 $248,000
55Packet Page 275 of 532
56Packet Page 276 of 532
CFP
STORMWATER
57Packet Page 277 of 532
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
De
s
i
g
n
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
4
6
,
2
6
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
6
4
6
,
2
6
0
$6
4
6
,
2
6
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
6
4
6
,
2
6
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
4
6
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$5
4
6
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
De
s
i
g
n
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
2
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
S
t
u
d
y
$
6
,
6
9
8
,
2
5
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
7
8
5
,
7
5
0
$
2
,
7
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
7
,
5
0
0
$2
,
2
3
2
,
7
5
0
(
P
a
r
k
s
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
)
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
9
5
,
2
5
0
$
9
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
2
,
5
0
0
$8
,
9
3
1
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
8
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
4
,
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
2
5
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$
1
7
,
7
4
9
,
2
6
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$
1
,
2
7
8
,
2
6
0
$
1
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
6
0
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
2
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
7
7
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
S
o
u
r
c
e
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
$0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
5
7
3
,
2
5
0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
5
3
5
,
7
5
0
$
3
,
5
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
8
7
,
5
0
0
$6
,
1
7
6
,
0
1
0
De
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
$1
,
2
0
3
,
2
6
0
$
3
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
6
5
,
2
5
0
$
1
,
7
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
8
9
,
5
0
0
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
1
&
3
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
to
H
i
c
k
m
a
n
P
a
r
k
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
w
i
t
h
Ra
i
n
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
a
n
d
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
e
(n
e
a
r
1
0
7
t
h
P
l
W
)
.
Ad
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
l
o
o
d
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
a
s
co
m
b
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
S
W
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
In
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
e
n
e
a
r
1
0
7
t
h
P
L
W
f
o
r
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
.
R
a
i
n
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
wi
l
l
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
o
n
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
.
20
1
8
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Gr
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
n
e
a
r
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
L
a
n
e
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
b
y
Y
e
a
r
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
Cr
e
e
k
/
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
/
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Co
n
d
u
c
t
r
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
f
l
a
p
g
a
t
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
b
e
t
t
e
r
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
P
u
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
,
a
n
d
r
e
m
o
v
e
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
.
Da
y
l
i
g
h
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
(
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
.
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
/
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Fi
n
d
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
h
i
g
h
p
e
a
k
s
t
r
e
a
m
f
l
o
w
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
st
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
t
h
a
t
e
r
o
d
e
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
,
c
a
u
s
e
s
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
ha
s
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
a
q
u
a
t
i
c
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
.
La
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
F
o
r
u
m
o
n
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
.
Lo
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
95
t
h
/
9
3
r
d
S
t
.
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
Ad
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
l
o
o
d
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
s
e
L
o
w
Im
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
m
a
n
a
g
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
.
58Packet Page 278 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Southwest Edmonds Basin
Study Projects 1 & 3 - Connect Sumps on 238th St
SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System with Rain
Gardens and Replace Infiltration pipe (near 107th Pl
W). SSWCP1 Projects 1A and 1C.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $646,260
Alignment of the proposed storm drain pipe along 238th St SW. Existing catch basin sumps in the foreground.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will install a stormwater pipe to replace the the existing
aging and incomplete storm drain system and install rain gardens on 104th Ave W. near
cemetery. This project has been combined with a replacement of an infiltration pipe (near
107th Pl W) for efficiency (this replacement project is not a CFP but it is included in the total
project cost).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Several sumps (dry wells) along 238th St SW in
Southwest Edmonds are not functioning properly. They have become clogged and are
contributing to area flooding during large storm events. Connecting the sumps to the City of
Edmonds infiltration system in located Hickman Park will reduce the potential for flooding. This
infiltration system was designed to handle the stormwater flows from this street. Rain gardens
have been added to the project for water quality treatment purposes.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $50,000
Eng. & Admin. $25,610
Construction $565,000
1% for Art $5,650
TOTAL $646,260
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2012 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%;2018-3%
59Packet Page 279 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Southwest Edmonds Basin
Study Project 2 – Connect Sumps near
Robinhood Lane – SSWCP1 Project 1B
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $546,000
Sumps along Friar Tuck Lane
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 1600 ft of 12 inch diameter pipe (600 ft in the public right of
way and 1000 ft on private property), 4 manholes, and 9 new connections to the existing storm
drain system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Several sumps (dry wells) in the vicinity of Robin Hood
Drive in Southwest Edmonds overflow during large storm events. Over time they have clogged
and may cause flooding. Connecting the sumps to the City of Edmonds storm drain system
with an overflow pipe, to function in large storm events, will reduce the potential for flooding.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $105,000 $441,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $105,000 $441,000
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2012 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%; 2018-3%
60Packet Page 280 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Low Impact Development
Retrofit Project - 95th/93rd St. Drainage
Improvement Project. – SSWCP1 Project 5
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $226,000
Project area along 93rd Pl W, south of 224th St SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Low Impact Development features, such as infiltration
galleries and rain gardens.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The drainage system in the vicinity of 95th Pl W, 93rd
PL W, and 224th St SW is inadequate; therefore causing flooding during large storm events.
This area was annexed into the City in October 1995. Installing a new stormwater
infrastructure will handle the stormwater runoff more efficiently and will reduce the potential
for flooding.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $50,000
Eng. & Admin. $5,000
Construction $171,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $226,000
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2012 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%; 2018 3%
61Packet Page 281 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Lake Ballinger Associated
Projects – SSWCP1 Project 7
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $700,000
Lake Ballinger
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work independently and with other members of the Greater Lake
Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum to implement the Strategic Action Plan. Funds will
be used for construction of improvements, as needed.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Homes surrounding Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek
have flooded during very large storm events. There are also significant water quality issues in
the watershed. Working with other entities will ensure cohesive standards between all
jurisdictions that will help reduce flooding and improve the water quality concerns.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $106,000 $110,000 $115,000 $119,000 $123,000 $127,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $106,000 $110,000 $115,000 $119,000 $123,000 $127,000
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2012 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%; 2018-3%
62Packet Page 282 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger
Cr/Willow Cr – SSWCP1 Projects 12 & 13
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $8,931,000
Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform. Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source:
www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-up/gallery.php
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build on a feasibility study to be completed in late 2012/early 2013 with
People for Puget Sound that will assess the feasibility of day lighting the Willow Creek channel. The
potential for salmonid rearing in the March will also be evaluated. The final project may include 23 acres
of revegetation, construct new tide gate to allow better connectivity to the Puget Sound, removal of
sediment, 1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be
used for study and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time. Grant funding at
75% is assumed for 2013-2018.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The daylight of willow creek will help reverse the negative impacts
to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped. It will also help
eliminate the sedimentation of the marsh and the transition to freshwater species and provide habitat for
salmonids.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $90,000
Eng. & Admin. $10,000
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $100,000 $500,000 $2,381,000 $3,700,000 $2,000,000 $250,000
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%; 2018 3%
63Packet Page 283 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow
Reduction/Management Project– SSWCP1
Project 15
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000
Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that
will be addressed by restoration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study is scheduled for 2013 that will develop
alternatives to implement in the basin. Beginning in 2014 projects are expected to be designed
and/or constructed. It is expected that this project will be implemented with the City of
Lynnwood (half the Perrinville basin is in Lynnwood) and Snohomish County (owner of the
South County Park). Projects will likely be a combination of detention, infiltration, and stream
bank stabilization. Grant funding at 75% is assumed for 2014-2018.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased
flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low-gradient downstream
reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be
controlled or these improvements will likely be washed away.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2018
COST BREAKDOWN2,3
PROJECT
COST
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $200,000
Eng. & Admin. $100,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000
Construction $400,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $200,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
1. SSWCP – Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan - 2010
2. Total costs are in 2012 dollars.
3. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%; 2018 3%
Perrinville
Creek
64Packet Page 284 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2013-2018
1Packet Page 285 of 532
2Packet Page 286 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2013-2018)
Table of Contents
FUND DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT PAGE
GENERAL
112 Transportation Public Works 6
113
Multimodal
Transportation
Community
Services
9
116
Building
Maintenance
Public Works
10
125
REET-2
Transportation
Public Works
12
129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation 13
412-100 Water Projects Public Works 14
412-200 Storm Projects Public Works 15
412-300 Sewer Projects Public Works 17
414
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
19
PARKS
125
REET-2 Parks
Improvement
Parks & Recreation
22
126 Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation 49
132
Parks Construction
(Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
53
3Packet Page 287 of 532
4Packet Page 288 of 532
CIP
GENERAL
5Packet Page 289 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
1
2
-
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
An
n
u
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
$1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
5t
h
A
v
e
S
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
f
r
o
m
E
l
m
W
a
y
t
o
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
$
7
7
3
,
5
0
0
$7
7
3
,
5
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
-
S
i
g
n
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
2
2
,
5
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
-
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
C
o
u
n
t
d
o
w
n
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
9
5
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
@
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
$5
0
8
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
8
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
f
o
r
N
B
L
T
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
@
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
(
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
)
$
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Sa
f
e
t
y
/
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
21
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
/
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
(
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
X
$
2
1
6
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
1
3
4
,
2
0
0
$3
,
1
3
4
,
2
0
0
22
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$
2
6
0
,
3
0
0
$
7
1
9
,
7
0
0
$
4
,
0
7
3
,
2
7
5
$
4
,
7
9
2
,
9
7
5
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$
1
6
1
,
5
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
8
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
2
0
0
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
7
7
9
,
0
0
0
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
-
G
u
a
r
d
r
a
i
l
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
-
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
9
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
3
r
d
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$1
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
3
,
0
0
0
Pu
g
e
t
D
r
.
@
O
V
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
8
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
X
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
X
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
22
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
3
,
0
0
0
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
i
g
n
a
l
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Hw
y
9
9
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
6
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
7
9
,
0
0
0
Ty
p
e
2
R
a
i
s
e
d
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
r
k
e
r
s
$9
8
,
0
0
0
$
9
8
,
0
0
0
No
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
X
$
1
,
4
7
6
,
2
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
SR
-
9
9
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
P
h
a
s
e
3
)
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
9
8
,
0
0
0
$
5
8
4
,
0
0
0
$6
8
2
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
.
t
o
C
a
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
X
$
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
9
9
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
t
o
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
X
$
1
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
$
4
3
6
,
0
0
0
15
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
S
X
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
$
3
7
1
,
0
0
0
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
f
r
o
m
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
t
o
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
$
7
7
7
,
0
0
0
23
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
/
S
R
-
1
0
4
t
o
M
a
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
X
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
7
,
0
0
0
$
4
1
7
,
0
0
0
2n
d
A
v
e
.
S
f
r
o
m
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
t
o
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$
3
2
,
0
0
0
AD
A
C
u
r
b
R
a
m
p
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
.
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
t
o
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
7
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
A
v
e
.
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Au
d
i
b
l
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
SR
-
1
0
4
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
M
i
d
b
l
o
c
k
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
X
$
2
7
1
,
0
0
0
$2
7
1
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$7
9
,
0
0
0
$
7
9
,
0
0
0
Sh
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
o
a
d
X
$
3
,
9
0
0
$0
22
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$
6
,
8
0
0
$0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
(
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
s
h
a
r
r
o
w
s
)
$1
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
S
i
g
n
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
$0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
(
S
u
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
,
o
t
h
e
r
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
e
s
)
X
$
4
,
5
8
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$2
,
1
8
8
,
1
8
0
$
5
,
7
9
9
,
2
0
0
$
7
,
0
9
6
,
4
7
5
$
2
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
9
7
6
,
5
0
0
$
3
,
6
1
5
,
5
0
0
$
6
,
5
6
8
,
5
0
0
$
2
9
,
4
8
7
,
1
7
5
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
)
$1
1
,
8
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
6Packet Page 290 of 532
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
(
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
)
$2
,
8
8
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
1
)
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
$1
9
,
1
4
1
$
1
9
,
0
5
0
$
1
8
,
9
6
0
$
1
8
,
8
6
9
$
1
8
,
8
6
0
$
1
8
,
7
7
0
$
1
8
,
6
8
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
2
)
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$2
2
,
5
5
3
$
2
2
,
4
4
7
$
2
2
,
3
4
1
$
2
2
,
2
3
5
$
2
2
,
2
2
9
$
2
2
,
1
2
3
$
2
2
,
1
0
7
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
3
)
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
R
o
a
d
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$3
5
,
3
4
9
$
3
5
,
1
8
3
$
3
5
,
0
1
9
$
3
4
,
8
5
4
$
3
4
,
8
5
4
$
3
4
,
6
9
0
$
3
4
,
6
7
1
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$8
8
,
8
4
3
$
7
9
,
5
6
0
$
7
6
,
3
2
0
$
7
5
,
9
5
8
$
7
5
,
9
4
3
$
7
5
,
5
8
3
$
7
5
,
4
5
8
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$4
2
3
,
4
4
9
$3
1
9
,
6
9
7
$
3
4
5
,
7
2
1
$
3
0
6
,
4
7
3
$
4
9
7
,
5
1
5
$
1
,
1
3
1
,
0
7
2
$
2
,
1
9
5
,
9
8
9
Mo
t
o
r
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
F
u
e
l
T
a
x
$
1
1
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
-
(
R
E
E
T
2
T
r
a
n
s
.
)
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$
2
2
2
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
$
1
2
8
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
$
2
2
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
$
2
4
1
,
4
0
0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
$2
9
,
5
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
(
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
)
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$1
,
0
3
3
,
3
4
9
$
1
,
6
2
0
,
6
9
7
$
5
9
0
,
7
2
1
$
8
0
3
,
4
7
3
$
9
9
7
,
5
1
5
$1
,
6
3
3
,
0
7
2
$
2
,
6
9
8
,
9
8
9
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
(S
t
a
t
e
-
T
I
B
)
f
o
r
5
t
h
A
v
e
S
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$5
5
1
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
-
f
o
r
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
-
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
P
e
d
.
C
o
u
n
t
d
o
w
n
D
i
s
p
l
a
y
$5
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
5
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
1
2
t
h
@
8
4
t
h
(
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
$1
8
7
,
6
1
9
$
2
,
2
7
1
,
8
4
2
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
2
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
2
2
5
,
1
6
0
$
7
1
9
,
7
0
0
$
3
,
7
9
1
,
7
5
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$
1
3
9
,
6
9
8
$
3
8
9
,
9
4
2
$
4
0
9
,
5
7
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
F
e
r
r
y
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
a
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
$4
8
7
,
5
7
4
$
1
9
0
,
3
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
$4
9
2
,
5
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
H
w
y
9
9
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
P
h
a
s
e
3
)
$2
,
0
0
0
$
9
8
,
0
0
0
$
5
8
4
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
5
,
4
4
9
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
2
6
t
h
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
8
,
3
7
1
Y ea
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$1
,
5
6
3
,
3
7
1
$
4
,
5
1
5
,
7
8
4
$4
,
7
8
5
,
3
2
0
$0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
7Packet Page 291 of 532
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
/
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
An
n
u
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
$1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
-
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
@
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
$2
5
6
,
0
0
0
22
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$2
4
3
,
5
1
9
76
t
h
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$2
2
6
,
7
0
8
$
1
,
4
0
8
,
0
0
0
19
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
@
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
-
G
u
a
r
d
r
a
i
l
$3
0
,
0
0
0
19
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
@
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
-
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
@
3
r
d
A
v
e
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$1
5
3
,
0
0
0
Pu
g
e
t
D
r
.
@
O
V
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
22
0
t
h
S
t
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
Fe
r
r
y
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
a
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Hw
y
9
9
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
6
6
3
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
t
o
C
a
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
$8
8
,
0
0
0
$
9
0
1
,
0
0
0
23
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
f
r
o
m
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
W
t
o
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
$1
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
15
t
h
S
t
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
W
$1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
0
0
0
80
t
h
A
v
e
/
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
23
6
t
h
S
t
S
W
f
r
o
m
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
y
/
S
R
-
1
0
4
t
o
M
a
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
7
,
0
0
0
2n
d
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
t
o
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
$3
2
,
0
0
0
AD
A
C
u
r
b
R
a
m
p
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$6
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Au
d
i
b
l
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$2
5
,
0
0
0
SR
-
1
0
4
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
M
i
d
-
B
l
o
c
k
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
$2
7
1
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$6
3
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$7
9
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
(
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
,
s
h
a
r
r
o
w
s
,
o
r
s
i
g
n
s
)
$5
8
,
0
0
0
$
5
8
,
0
0
0
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
S
i
g
n
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
/
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
n
o
t
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
0
3
,
2
2
7
$
2
,
2
0
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
6
8
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
2
5
4
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
1
6
1
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
/
N
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
$1
,
5
6
3
,
3
7
1
$
4
,
6
0
3
,
7
8
4
$
6
,
8
8
8
,
5
4
7
$
2
,
2
0
1
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
1
8
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
2
5
4
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
1
6
1
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$2
,
5
9
6
,
7
2
0
$
6
,
2
2
4
,
4
8
1
$
7
,
4
7
9
,
2
6
8
$
3
,
0
0
4
,
4
7
3
$
5
,
1
8
3
,
5
1
5
$
5
,
8
8
7
,
0
7
2
$
9
,
8
5
9
,
9
8
9
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
($
2
,
1
8
8
,
1
8
0
)
(
$
5
,
7
9
9
,
2
0
0
)
(
$
7
,
0
9
6
,
4
7
5
)
(
$
2
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
9
7
6
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
6
1
5
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
6
,
5
6
8
,
5
0
0
)
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
($
8
8
,
8
4
3
)
(
$
7
9
,
5
6
0
)
(
$
7
6
,
3
2
0
)
(
$
7
5
,
9
5
8
)
(
$
7
5
,
9
4
3
)
(
$
7
5
,
5
8
3
)
(
$
7
5
,
4
5
8
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$3
1
9
,
6
9
7
$
3
4
5
,
7
2
1
$
3
0
6
,
4
7
3
$
4
9
7
,
5
1
5
$
1
,
1
3
1
,
0
7
2
$
2
,
1
9
5
,
9
8
9
$
3
,
2
1
6
,
0
3
1
8Packet Page 292 of 532
Capital Improvements Program
Fund 113 - Multimodal Transportation
PROJECT NAME CFP 2012
Estimate 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
(2013-2018)
Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility X
Project 1A - Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $57,000,000
Project 1B - Ferry underpass at Main St Railroad Crossing
Total Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $57,000,000
Revenues and Cash Balances 2012-2018
2012
Estimate 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859
StateTransportation Appropriations - Current Law -Local Matching $
Federal Funding (Unsecured)$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
ST2
Interest Earnings
Total Revenues $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $1,055,859 $1,055,859 $1,055,859
Total Revenue $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $1,055,859 $1,055,859 $1,055,859
Total Project $0 $0 $0 $0 ($1,000,000)($1,000,000)($1,000,000)
Ending Cash Balance $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859
Projects for 2013-2018
]
9
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
2
9
3
o
f
5
3
2
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
1
6
-
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
AD
A
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
C
i
t
y
W
i
d
e
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
$3
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
o
i
l
e
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
R
a
d
i
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
8
5
,
0
0
0
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$6
5
,
0
0
0
$6
5
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
l
i
n
d
s
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
A
s
b
e
s
t
o
s
A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
/
G
y
m
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
u
n
t
e
r
t
o
p
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
O
i
l
T
a
n
k
D
e
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ce
m
e
t
e
r
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
G
u
t
t
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$5
,
0
0
0
$0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
.
B
l
d
g
.
R
o
o
f
$0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
C
a
r
p
e
t
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
H
V
A
C
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
C
a
r
p
e
t
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
C
a
r
p
e
t
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
S
t
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
D
e
c
k
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
n
d
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
P
l
a
z
a
A
p
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$4
,
5
0
0
$4
,
5
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
P
l
a
z
a
B
r
i
c
k
F
a
ç
a
d
e
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$2
1
,
0
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
W
o
o
d
T
r
i
m
$0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
G
u
t
t
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
E
x
t
.
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
$0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
F
i
r
e
A
l
a
r
m
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Mi
s
c
.
F
i
r
e
S
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
/
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
S
o
f
f
i
t
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
$2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
C
a
r
p
e
t
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
R
a
i
l
i
n
g
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
$9
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
M
i
s
c
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
&
M
a
i
n
t
.
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
d
i
n
g
/
S
e
a
l
i
n
g
(
C
D
B
G
)
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$8
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
1
,
5
0
0
$
2
4
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
9
4
,
5
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
10Packet Page 294 of 532
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
6
0
0
$
2
9
8
,
6
0
0
$
3
3
,
6
0
0
$
4
2
,
1
0
0
$
5
1
,
1
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
G
e
n
F
u
n
d
#
0
0
1
$5
6
,
6
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
CT
E
D
G
r
a
n
t
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Sn
o
.
C
o
.
C
D
B
G
G
r
a
n
t
(
N
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
EE
C
B
G
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
WA
S
t
a
t
e
H
C
P
F
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
4
6
3
,
6
0
0
$
5
4
8
,
6
0
0
$
2
8
3
,
6
0
0
$
2
9
2
,
1
0
0
$
3
0
1
,
1
0
0
$
2
5
1
,
1
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
4
6
3
,
6
0
0
$
5
4
8
,
6
0
0
$
2
8
3
,
6
0
0
$
2
9
2
,
1
0
0
$
3
0
1
,
1
0
0
$
2
5
1
,
1
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
($
8
3
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
1
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
4
1
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
2
4
1
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
6
3
,
6
0
0
$
2
9
8
,
6
0
0
$
3
3
,
6
0
0
$
4
2
,
1
0
0
$
5
1
,
1
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
$
1
9
,
1
0
0
11Packet Page 295 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
R
E
E
T
2
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
RE
E
T
2
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
12Packet Page 296 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
9
-
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
St
a
t
e
R
o
u
t
e
(
S
R
)
9
9
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
$4
6
0
,
7
0
0
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
$1
4
,
7
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$4
6
0
,
7
0
0
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$5
,
8
4
1
$
5
,
8
4
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$5
,
8
4
1
$
5
,
8
4
1
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
PS
R
C
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
G
r
a
n
t
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
6
0
,
7
0
0
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
To
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
$4
6
0
,
7
0
0
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$4
6
6
,
5
4
1
$
2
0
,
5
4
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
($
4
6
0
,
7
0
0
)
(
$
1
4
,
7
0
0
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$5
,
8
4
1
$
5
,
8
4
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
13Packet Page 297 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
-
W
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
20
1
0
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
9
6
,
0
0
0
$0
20
1
1
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$8
8
1
,
2
0
0
$0
20
1
2
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$8
0
6
,
2
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
2
W
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
$2
6
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
8
7
,
9
8
0
$2
,
0
8
7
,
9
8
0
20
1
4
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
1
7
,
7
1
9
$3
,
0
1
2
,
7
1
9
20
1
5
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
5
,
1
8
1
$
2
,
6
9
7
,
5
1
1
$2
,
7
9
2
,
6
9
2
20
1
6
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
8
,
9
8
8
$
2
,
8
5
7
,
5
5
2
$2
,
9
5
6
,
5
4
0
20
1
7
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
0
2
,
9
4
8
$
2
,
9
7
1
,
9
3
4
$3
,
0
7
4
,
8
8
2
20
1
8
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
0
7
,
0
6
5
$
3
,
2
0
2
,
6
0
0
$
3
,
3
0
9
,
6
6
5
20
1
9
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
2
,
0
0
0
Pi
o
n
e
e
r
W
a
y
R
o
a
d
R
e
p
a
i
r
/
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
$3
6
,
7
0
0
$0
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
3
.
0
M
G
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
R
e
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
$7
2
2
,
8
0
0
$7
2
2
,
8
0
0
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
1
.
5
M
G
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
R
e
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
$4
7
7
,
3
0
0
$4
7
7
,
3
0
0
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
P
R
V
I
m
p
r
)
$5
9
,
3
0
0
$
4
9
0
,
8
0
0
$4
9
0
,
8
0
0
Te
l
e
m
e
t
r
y
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$6
8
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
1
,
9
0
0
$
1
2
,
4
0
0
$
1
2
,
9
0
0
$
1
2
8
,
3
0
0
20
1
6
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
$8
6
,
1
0
0
$
8
9
,
5
0
0
$1
7
5
,
6
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$2
,
2
9
0
,
4
0
0
$
2
,
7
5
7
,
3
8
0
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
6
1
6
,
8
9
9
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
9
9
$
3
,
3
2
7
,
5
0
0
$
1
9
,
3
5
6
,
2
7
8
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
e
w
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
(
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
)
$3
1
,
2
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
M
a
i
n
S
t
)
$2
2
2
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
5
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
)
$2
2
2
,
5
0
0
$2
2
2
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
(
2
0
1
3
W
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
)
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
(
2
0
1
0
W
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
)
$3
,
2
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
(
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
)
$1
7
8
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
L
S
2
$7
9
1
$0
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$2
5
7
,
3
6
9
$
9
2
7
,
5
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
9
2
7
,
5
0
0
To
t
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$2
,
5
4
7
,
7
6
9
$
3
,
6
8
4
,
8
8
0
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
6
1
6
,
8
9
9
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
9
9
$
3
,
3
2
7
,
5
0
0
$
2
0
,
2
8
3
,
7
7
8
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$4
,
0
3
4
,
6
7
8
$
1
,
7
9
7
,
6
0
9
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
5
2
9
$
6
4
6
,
5
2
9
$
3
,
8
6
4
,
7
3
0
$
4
6
5
,
1
3
1
$
3
,
9
1
7
,
9
1
5
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
1
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
F
i
r
e
H
y dr
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
W
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
$5
4
,
0
0
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
F
i
r
e
H
y dr
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
W
a
t
e
r
m
a
i
n
$3
0
,
7
0
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
F
i
r
e
H
y dr
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
M
a
i
n
S
t
I
m
p
r
.
$5
,
0
0
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
F
i
r
e
H
y dr
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
0
1
,
8
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
9
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
1
0
0
$
1
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
1
8
4
$
1
2
3
,
9
0
0
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
s
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
L
o
a
n
s
,
m
i
s
c
)
$
4
,
3
4
5
,
3
7
8
$
1
,
9
2
4
,
4
0
9
$
3
,
6
7
0
,
4
2
9
$
7
8
1
,
6
2
9
$
4
,
0
0
4
,
3
3
0
$
6
0
9
,
3
1
5
$
4
,
0
6
6
,
8
1
5
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Ne
w
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
l
o
a
n
s
,
b
o
n
d
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$5
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
6
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
6
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$0
$
5
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
6
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
6
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$4
,
3
4
5
,
3
7
8
$
7
,
2
2
4
,
4
0
9
$
3
,
6
7
0
,
4
2
9
$
7
,
4
8
1
,
6
2
9
$
4
,
0
0
4
,
3
3
0
$
7
,
0
0
9
,
3
1
5
$
4
,
0
6
6
,
8
1
5
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
($
2
,
5
4
7
,
7
6
9
)
(
$
3
,
6
8
4
,
8
8
0
)
(
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
6
1
6
,
8
9
9
)
(
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
9
9
)
(
$
3
,
3
2
7
,
5
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
,
7
9
7
,
6
0
9
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
5
2
9
$
6
4
6
,
5
2
9
$
3
,
8
6
4
,
7
3
0
$
4
6
5
,
1
3
1
$
3
,
9
1
7
,
9
1
5
$
7
3
9
,
3
1
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
14Packet Page 298 of 532
CF
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
1
&
3
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
i
p
e
(
n
e
a
r
1
0
7
t
h
P
L
W
)
&
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
su
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
t
o
H
i
c
k
m
a
n
P
a
r
k
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
+
a
d
d
R
a
i
n
Ga
r
d
e
n
s
t
o
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
W
.
X
$9
4
,
1
0
0
$
6
4
6
,
2
6
0
$6
4
6
,
2
6
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
2
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
s
u
m
p
s
n
e
a
r
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
L
N
X
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
4
6
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
a
n
d
H
w
y
1
0
4
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
S
t
u
d
y
$
1
9
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
8
3
,
0
0
0
$2
8
3
,
0
0
0
Wi
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
P
i
p
e
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
$5
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
5
1
9
,
0
0
0
No
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
a
m
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
A
b
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
S
o
u
t
h
o
f
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
-
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Re
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
o
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
a
m
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
u
n
d
e
r
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ta
l
b
o
t
R
d
/
P
e
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
&
H
a
b
i
t
a
t
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
$5
9
8
,
0
0
0
$0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
(
D
e
s
i
g
n
)
$
6
6
,
0
0
0
$0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
(P
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
/
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
)
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
u
d
y
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
v
e
r
f
o
r
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
P
i
l
e
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
2
)
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
Wa
s
t
e
h
a
n
d
l
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
3
)
$8
0
,
5
2
1
$
2
6
3
,
4
2
4
$2
6
3
,
4
2
4
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
6
t
h
a
n
d
8
t
h
A
v
e
N
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$3
9
0
,
0
0
0
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
a
n
d
1
9
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
No
r
t
h
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
1
0
8
,
8
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$
1
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
4
,
0
0
0
$1
6
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
6
4
,
0
0
0
La
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
4
)
X
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Lo
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
5
)
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$1
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
6
,
0
0
0
St
o
r
m
a
n
d
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
s
s
e
s
t
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
)
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Go
o
d
h
o
p
e
P
o
n
d
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
St
o
r
m
S
y
s
t
e
m
V
i
d
e
o
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
S
t
o
r
m
C
u
r
e
d
i
n
-
p
l
a
c
e
p
i
p
e
(
C
I
P
P
)
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
$
2
,
0
0
0
$0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
X
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
-
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
/
M
a
r
s
h
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(Se
e
N
o
t
e
s
6
&
7
)
X
$7
6
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
3
8
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
9
3
1
,
0
0
0
Sh
e
l
l
C
r
e
e
k
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
Y
o
s
t
P
a
r
k
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
5
6
,
4
2
1
$
2
,
0
2
5
,
6
8
4
$2
,
8
4
4
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
7
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
8
9
4
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
1
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
7
7
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
,
3
1
3
,
6
8
4
No
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
a
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
An
n
u
a
l
l
y
F
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ti
e
r
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
A
s
s
u
m
e
7
5
%
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
e
d
&
2
5
%
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
e
d
u
n
l
e
s
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
.
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
Ti
e
r
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
A
s
s
u
m
e
1
0
0
%
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
e
d
u
n
l
e
s
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
.
SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
l
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
1
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
S
t
o
r
m
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Y
a
r
d
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
St
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
B
a
s
i
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
1
)
5
Y
e
a
r
C
y
c
l
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
S
t
o
r
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
15Packet Page 299 of 532
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
$1
2
8
,
5
0
0
$1
2
8
,
5
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
$2
4
1
,
4
0
0
$0
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
-
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
3
,
0
0
0
$1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
4
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
1
1
2
F
u
n
d
$
2
4
1
,
4
0
0
$
2
2
8
,
5
0
0
$
1
0
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
8
2
,
5
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
(
L
o
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
1
,
7
2
3
$
2
,
3
6
0
$2
,
3
6
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$0
SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
e
n
e
a
r
1
0
7
t
h
P
l
W
/
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
Su
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
t
o
H
i
c
k
m
a
n
P
a
r
k
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
$5
,
6
5
0
$5
,
6
5
0
5
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
$1
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
V
a
u
l
t
(
f
r
o
m
L
a
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
)
$1
,
7
5
0
$0
Ot
h
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
1
%
f
o
r
A
r
t
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
$1
2
,
6
5
0
$
2
1
,
1
8
1
$
2
6
,
2
1
6
$
2
2
,
2
8
8
$
1
6
,
8
0
0
$9
9
,
1
3
4
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
1
1
7
F
u
n
d
$3
,
4
7
3
$
9
,
0
1
0
$
1
2
,
6
5
0
$
2
1
,
1
8
1
$
2
6
,
2
1
6
$
2
2
,
2
8
8
$
1
6
,
8
0
0
$
1
0
8
,
1
4
4
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
e
r
m
e
a
b
l
e
P
a
v
i
n
g
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
s
t
s
)
$
4
5
,
6
1
1
$0
St
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
o
n
7
6
t
h
-
p
a
r
t
o
f
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
f
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
-
W
i
d
e
)
$0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
V
a
u
l
t
(
f
r
o
m
L
a
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
2
0
1
2
)
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
1
3
2
F
u
n
d
$
9
5
,
6
1
1
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$3
4
0
,
4
8
4
$2
3
7
,
5
1
0
$
1
1
5
,
6
5
0
$
1
2
7
,
1
8
1
$
2
3
5
,
2
1
6
$1
3
8
,
2
8
8
$
1
3
6
,
8
0
0
$
9
9
0
,
6
4
4
$1
,
7
9
6
,
9
0
5
$
2
,
2
6
3
,
1
9
4
$
2
,
9
5
9
,
6
5
0
$
4
,
8
8
9
,
1
8
1
$
6
,
1
2
9
,
2
1
6
$
5
,
1
4
9
,
2
8
8
$
3
,
9
1
3
,
8
0
0
$
2
5
,
3
0
4
,
3
2
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
$3
,
0
0
8
,
8
9
7
$
1
,
3
4
8
,
4
9
2
$
1
,
5
3
5
,
2
9
8
$
2
,
0
3
0
,
1
4
8
$
1
9
8
,
7
1
7
$
6
1
6
,
5
0
2
$
4
8
9
,
2
1
3
$8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$0
$
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
0
$1
2
0
,
5
0
0
$
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$3
,
1
4
5
,
3
9
7
$
1
,
5
4
8
,
4
9
2
$
1
,
8
5
6
,
2
9
8
$
2
,
0
5
2
,
1
4
8
$
2
2
0
,
7
1
7
$
6
3
8
,
5
0
2
$
4
9
9
,
2
1
3
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
$0
$
2
,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
0
$
8
8
3
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
5
3
5
,
7
5
0
$
3
,
5
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
8
7
,
5
0
0
$0
$
2
,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
3
3
,
5
0
0
$
3
,
0
3
5
,
7
5
0
$
6
,
5
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
8
7
,
5
0
0
$3
,
1
4
5
,
3
9
7
$
3
,
7
9
8
,
4
9
2
$
4
,
9
8
9
,
7
9
8
$
5
,
0
8
7
,
8
9
8
$
6
,
7
4
5
,
7
1
7
$
5
,
6
3
8
,
5
0
2
$
3
,
6
8
6
,
7
1
3
($
1
,
7
9
6
,
9
0
5
)
(
$
2
,
2
6
3
,
1
9
4
)
(
$
2
,
9
5
9
,
6
5
0
)
(
$
4
,
8
8
9
,
1
8
1
)
(
$
6
,
1
2
9
,
2
1
6
)
(
$
5
,
1
4
9
,
2
8
8
)
(
$
3
,
9
1
3
,
8
0
0
)
$1
,
3
4
8
,
4
9
2
$
1
,
5
3
5
,
2
9
8
$
2
,
0
3
0
,
1
4
8
$
1
9
8
,
7
1
7
$
6
1
6
,
5
0
2
$
4
8
9
,
2
1
3
(
$
2
2
7
,
0
8
6
)
5.
F
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
9
5
t
h
/
9
3
r
d
A
v
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
6.
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
n
l
y
.
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
l
c
u
d
e
g
r
a
n
t
f
r
o
m
S
a
l
m
o
n
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
B
o
a
r
d
g
i
v
e
n
t
o
P
e
o
p
l
e
f
o
r
P
u
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
.
3.
7
5
%
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
e
d
.
7.
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
t
w
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
y
e
a
r
'
s
C
I
P
(
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
)
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
To
1
3
2
-
P
a
r
k
s
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
L
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
(
B
o
n
d
s
)
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
1
1
7
-
A
r
t
s
2.
1
0
0
%
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
e
d
.
No
t
e
s
:
1.
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
u
n
d
e
r
T
i
e
r
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
e
l
o
w
.
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
(
4
1
1
)
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
s
(
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
)
Gr
a
n
t
s
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
1
1
2
-
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
As
s
u
m
e
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
o
a
n
s
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
&
i
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
4.
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
u
n
d
e
r
'
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
'
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
v
a
u
l
t
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
Pr
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
L
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
(
B
o
n
d
s
)
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
16Packet Page 300 of 532
CF
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Li
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
$4
4
,
3
0
0
$0
Li
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
,
4
,
5
,
9
,
1
0
,
1
1
,
1
2
,
1
4
,
&
1
5
$8
0
3
,
7
2
0
$
3
,
4
8
4
,
9
0
0
$3
,
4
8
4
,
9
0
0
20
1
2
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
0
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
$1
,
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
20
1
3
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
9
8
2
,
0
0
0
$1
,
9
8
2
,
0
0
0
20
1
5
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
9
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
8
7
8
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
7
5
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
9
0
,
0
0
0
$4
3
0
,
0
0
0
20
1
8
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
e
w
e
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
C
I
P
P
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
$3
,
4
0
0
$
3
0
2
,
6
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
3
5
2
,
6
0
0
Me
t
e
r
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
B
a
s
i
n
L
S
-
0
1
$1
,
0
0
0
$
7
2
,
6
0
0
$7
2
,
6
0
0
Me
t
e
r
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
B
a
s
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Z
o
n
e
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Sm
o
k
e
T
e
s
t
i
n
B
a
s
i
n
L
S
-
0
1
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
Sm
o
k
e
T
e
s
t
i
n
B
a
s
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Z
o
n
e
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
9
9
,
1
0
0
$9
9
,
1
0
0
$1
,
0
2
6
,
9
2
0
$
7
,
2
4
0
,
7
0
0
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
6
4
0
,
7
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
)
$
1
3
,
9
5
0
$0
$1
3
,
9
5
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
,
0
4
0
,
8
7
0
$
7
,
2
4
0
,
7
0
0
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
6
4
0
,
7
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
-
S
e
w
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
20
1
2
S
e
w
e
r
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Se
w
e
r
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Se
w
e
r
M
a
i
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
C
I
P
P
In
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
&
I
n
f
l
o
w
S
t
u
d
y
&
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
17Packet Page 301 of 532
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
$4
,
4
9
2
,
8
9
0
$
4
,
2
9
1
,
7
2
0
$
9
0
8
,
0
2
0
$
2
3
1
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
1
0
3
,
0
2
0
$
2
5
3
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
2
4
3
,
0
2
0
$8
,
5
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$3
1
,
2
0
0
$4
7
,
0
0
0
$8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
3
3
2
,
5
9
0
$
4
,
3
4
8
,
7
2
0
$
9
3
3
,
0
2
0
$
2
5
6
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
1
2
8
,
0
2
0
$
2
7
8
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
2
6
8
,
0
2
0
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
$3
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
3
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$0
$
3
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
3
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$5
,
3
3
2
,
5
9
0
$
8
,
1
4
8
,
7
2
0
$
9
3
3
,
0
2
0
$
3
,
3
5
6
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
1
2
8
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
7
7
8
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
2
6
8
,
0
2
0
($
1
,
0
4
0
,
8
7
0
)
(
$
7
,
2
4
0
,
7
0
0
)
(
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
1
,
0
3
5
,
0
0
0
)
$4
,
2
9
1
,
7
2
0
$
9
0
8
,
0
2
0
$
2
3
1
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
1
0
3
,
0
2
0
$
2
5
3
,
0
2
0
$
1
,
2
4
3
,
0
2
0
$
2
3
3
,
0
2
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
F
u
n
d
4
1
4
(
2
0
1
2
S
e
w
e
r
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
Se
w
e
r
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
s
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
s
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
L
o
a
n
s
,
m
i
s
c
)
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
Ne
w
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
l
o
a
n
s
,
b
o
n
d
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
1
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
(
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
)
18Packet Page 302 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
4
1
4
-
W
W
T
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Re
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
,
2
4
7
,
2
7
4
$
9
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
8
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
2
1
5
,
0
0
0
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
St
u
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
(
S
e
w
e
r
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
)
$4
7
,
0
0
0
$4
7
,
0
0
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
a
n
d
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
$2
6
0
,
0
2
7
$
2
6
2
,
2
7
4
$
2
6
3
,
0
9
2
$
2
6
3
,
0
1
8
$
2
6
3
,
0
7
2
$
2
6
1
,
7
7
8
$
2
6
0
,
9
4
0
$
1
,
5
7
4
,
1
7
4
PW
T
F
L
o
a
n
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
$7
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
7
5
4
$
2
5
0
,
7
5
4
$
2
5
0
,
7
5
4
$
2
5
0
,
7
5
4
$
1
,
2
3
2
,
0
1
6
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$1
,
5
8
2
,
3
0
1
$
2
,
1
2
7
,
2
7
4
$
2
,
5
9
4
,
0
9
2
$
2
,
4
0
8
,
7
7
2
$
1
,
1
6
3
,
8
2
6
$
1
,
1
6
2
,
5
3
2
$
1
,
1
6
1
,
6
9
4
$
1
0
,
6
1
8
,
1
9
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$2
0
5
,
9
4
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
$9
0
,
5
8
7
$
3
0
0
,
7
7
4
$
4
0
4
,
5
9
2
$
4
9
9
,
2
7
2
$
4
9
9
,
3
2
6
$
4
9
8
,
0
3
2
$
4
9
7
,
1
9
4
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
(
b
i
o
s
o
l
i
d
s
,
L
y
n
n
w
o
o
d
,
e
t
c
)
$1
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
,
0
0
0
Re
b
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
P
U
D
f
o
r
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
.
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
PW
T
F
L
o
a
n
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
$9
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
9
5
,
0
0
0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$4
6
0
,
0
2
7
$
1
,
4
4
5
,
2
7
4
$
2
,
0
9
4
,
0
9
2
$
2
,
3
0
8
,
7
7
2
$
7
1
3
,
8
2
6
$
7
1
2
,
5
3
2
$
7
1
1
,
6
9
4
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
y
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
$1
,
3
2
2
,
2
7
4
$
8
8
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$1
,
7
8
2
,
3
0
1
$
2
,
3
2
7
,
2
7
4
$
2
,
7
9
4
,
0
9
2
$
2
,
6
0
8
,
7
7
2
$
1
,
3
6
3
,
8
2
6
$
1
,
3
6
2
,
5
3
2
$
1
,
3
6
1
,
6
9
4
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
($
1
,
5
8
2
,
3
0
1
)
(
$
2
,
1
2
7
,
2
7
4
)
(
$
2
,
5
9
4
,
0
9
2
)
(
$
2
,
4
0
8
,
7
7
2
)
(
$
1
,
1
6
3
,
8
2
6
)
(
$
1
,
1
6
2
,
5
3
2
)
(
$
1
,
1
6
1
,
6
9
4
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
a
r
n
e
d
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
a
t
0
.
7
5
%
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
d
o
n
e
b
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
b
i
l
l
i
n
g
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
)
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Re
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
,
2
4
7
,
2
7
4
$
8
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
St
u
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
7
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$1
,
3
2
2
,
2
7
4
$
8
8
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
b
r
e
a
k
d
o
w
n
b
y
a
g
e
n
c
y
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
5
0
.
7
9
%
$
6
7
1
,
5
4
3
$
4
4
7
,
9
4
1
$
3
5
5
,
5
0
9
$
1
5
2
,
3
6
1
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
Mo
u
n
t
l
a
k
e
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
23
.
1
7
%
$3
0
6
,
4
2
4
$
2
0
4
,
3
9
5
$
1
6
2
,
2
1
8
$
6
9
,
5
2
2
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
W
a
t
e
r
&
S
e
w
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
16
.
5
5
%
$2
1
8
,
8
5
0
$
1
4
5
,
9
8
0
$
1
1
5
,
8
5
7
$
4
9
,
6
5
3
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
Ro
n
a
l
d
S
e
w
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
9.
4
9
%
$1
2
5
,
4
5
7
$
8
3
,
6
8
4
$
6
6
,
4
1
6
$
2
8
,
4
6
4
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
TO
T
A
L
S
10
0
.
0
0
%
$1
,
3
2
2
,
2
7
4
$
8
8
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
19Packet Page 303 of 532
20Packet Page 304 of 532
CIP
PARKS
21Packet Page 305 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
P
a
r
k
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
Pa
r
k
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
*
Ha
i
n
e
s
W
h
a
r
f
P
a
r
k
&
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
i
e
l
d
/
C
o
u
r
t
/
S
t
a
g
e
$5
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
Br
a
c
k
e
t
t
'
s
L
a
n
d
i
n
g
N
o
r
t
h
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
9
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$5
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
X
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
s
h
i
n
g
P
i
e
r
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
Fo
r
m
e
r
W
o
o
d
w
a
y
H
S
(w
i
t
h
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
)
X
$1
5
5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
P
a
r
k
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
r
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
P
a
r
k
$5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$1
3
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
t
h
a
y
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
P
a
r
k
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
G
r
o
u
n
d
s
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$6
5
,
0
0
0
Pi
n
e
R
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Se
a
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
Si
e
r
r
a
P
a
r
k
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Yo
s
t
P
a
r
k
/
P
o
o
l
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
*
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
B
e
a
u
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$2
9
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
,
0
0
0
$2
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
,
0
0
0
N
o
t
E
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
N
o
t
E
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
$1
0
2
,
0
0
0
Mi
s
c
P
a
v
i
n
g
$5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
M
i
s
c
S
m
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
i
e
l
d
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
/
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
z
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
*
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
(d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
)
X
$0
Tr
a
i
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
*
Mi
s
c
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
T
r
a
i
l
/
B
i
k
e
P
a
t
h
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
A
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
S
t
u
d
y
X
No
t
E
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
$0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
-
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
X
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Pi
n
e
R
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
F
o
r
e
s
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
4
4
4
,
0
0
0
$
9
8
9
,
0
0
0
$
7
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
5
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
1
8
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
4
t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
)
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
P
l
a
z
a
)
$1
3
5
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
O
l
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
)
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$1
7
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$6
1
6
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
$
8
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
5
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
1
8
2
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
22Packet Page 306 of 532
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$3
9
0
,
2
1
2
$
6
0
1
,
7
1
2
$
2
3
7
,
7
1
2
$
6
8
,
7
1
2
$
1
9
1
,
7
1
2
$
2
3
9
,
7
1
2
$
1
7
9
,
7
1
2
Re
a
l
E
s
t
a
t
e
T
a
x
1
/
4
%
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Do
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$1
,
2
1
8
,
2
1
2
$
1
,
2
5
1
,
7
1
2
$
8
8
7
,
7
1
2
$
7
1
8
,
7
1
2
$
8
4
1
,
7
1
2
$
8
8
9
,
7
1
2
$
8
2
9
,
7
1
2
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$1
,
2
1
8
,
2
1
2
$
1
,
2
5
1
,
7
1
2
$
8
8
7
,
7
1
2
$
7
1
8
,
7
1
2
$
8
4
1
,
7
1
2
$
8
8
9
,
7
1
2
$
8
2
9
,
7
1
2
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
($
6
1
6
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
8
1
9
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
2
7
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
0
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
7
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
3
5
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$6
0
1
,
7
1
2
$
2
3
7
,
7
1
2
$
6
8
,
7
1
2
$
1
9
1
,
7
1
2
$
2
3
9
,
7
1
2
$
1
7
9
,
7
1
2
$
1
9
4
,
7
1
2
*P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
a
l
l
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
1
%
f
o
r
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
23Packet Page 307 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Haines Wharf Park &
Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $178,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Maintain neighborhood park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $178,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $178,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
24Packet Page 308 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center
Field/Court/Stage
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $185,000
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children’s play equipment. Replacement and renovation of amphitheater in 2012 with
improved courtyard area and drainage.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $5,000 $30,000 $130,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $30,000 $130,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
25Packet Page 309 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Brackett’s Landing
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed-of-Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
repairs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $95,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $95,000 $5,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
26Packet Page 310 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Revitalization
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $575,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Revitalize City Park play area with new play equipment and addition
of a spray park amenity to be used in the summer. Spray parks have become very popular in
many communities as replacements for wading pools that are no longer acceptable to increased
health department regulations. These installations create no standing water and therefore require
little maintenance and no lifeguard costs. Staff will seek voluntary donations for construction
costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project combines two play areas and the completion of
the master plan from 1992. This is very competitive for State grant funding, as it will be using a
repurposing water system. This will be a much valued revitalization and addition to the City’s
oldest and most cherished park.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $500,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $500,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
27Packet Page 311 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Complex
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000
6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Park Development
Bleacher/stadium repairs, infield mix, baseball/softball turf repair, retaining wall, fence and
play structure replacement, skate park and facility amenities, tennis and sports courts repair
and resurfacing, irrigation. Regrade and improve track. Upgrade portable restrooms.
Landscape and site furnishing improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for Civic Center Field.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $10,000 $10,000 $75,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $10,000 $10,000 $75,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
28Packet Page 312 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms ESTIMATED COST: $70,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re-tile and
renovate restroom facilities. Electrical upgrade, rail and shelter replacements / renovations.
Work with WDFW on structural repairs of concrete spalling on pier subsurface.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
29Packet Page 313 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Former Woodway HS
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,555,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges,
user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital
campaign. $10m - $12M project.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and undermaintained
facility with great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $155,000 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $155,000 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
30Packet Page 314 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $20,000
89th Place West and 197th Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2013, 2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $5,000 $5,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
31Packet Page 315 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $130,000
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; Protected through Deed-of-Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand parking area. Portable restroom upgrades. Repair and
improvements to off-leash area. Replace play structure and install interpretive sign.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $5,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $5,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
32Packet Page 316 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000
78th Place W. & 241st. St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Install path from Interurban Trail spur terminal to parking lot. Replace play structure and
improve picnic area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2012 - 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $100,000 $20,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $100,000 $20,000 $5,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
33Packet Page 317 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse
Grounds
ESTIMATED COST: $65,000
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site. Replace playground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $5,000 $50,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $5,000 $50,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
34Packet Page 318 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
83rd Avenue West and 204th St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2015
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $5,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $5,000
New additions meet the 1% for the Arts Ordinance requirements
35Packet Page 319 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $35,000
80th Street West and 186th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed-
Of-Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Re-surface
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area maintenance. Renovate restrooms.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2012 - 2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $20,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $20,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
36Packet Page 320 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $115,000
80th Street West and 191th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve pathways and interpretive braille signs. Field renovation
to include field drainage for turf repair.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities,
basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind.
SCHEDULE: 2014-2015
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $40,000 $75,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $40,000 $75,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
37Packet Page 321 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Sunset Avenue
Overlook Trail
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop a 2,000 foot trail with expansive views of the Puget Sound
and the Olympic Mountains. The trail will connect the downtown business district, surrounding
neighborhoods, water access points, and the existing parks and trails system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This new trail would be ADA accessible and able to
accommodate walkers, joggers, bicyclists, picnickers, or those there to enjoy the view . This trail
has been a priority for the City of Edmonds for several years. It is included in 5 different City
plans, the Transportation Improvement Plan, Non-Motorized Section; the Parks Recreation and
Open Plan; the City comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan; the Capital Improvement Plan;
and the Shoreline Master Program. Specifically, the Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan
identified Sunset Avenue Overlook priorities, namely improved connectivity and multi-modal
access, complete the bicycle and pedestrian route system, identify scenic routes and view areas,
and landscape improvements.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction 200,000
1% for Art
TOTAL 200,000
38Packet Page 322 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park/Pool
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $470,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in-pool play amenities.
Park site improvements and repairs to trails and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping,
parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $50,000 $120,000 $75,000 $125,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $50,000 $120,000 $75,000 $125,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
39Packet Page 323 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $216,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include library, Senior Center, outdoor
plaza, city park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree plantings,
streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $36,000 $29,000 $29,000 $22,000 $22,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $36,000 $29,000 $29,000 $22,000 $22,000 Not Eligible Not Eligible
40Packet Page 324 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Paving ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $40,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes miscellaneous small paving and park walkway
improvements citywide.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvement needs citywide in park system.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $5,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
* all or a portion of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
41Packet Page 325 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $335,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4th Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction $35,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $70,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $35,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $70,000
42Packet Page 326 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade /
Playground Partnerships
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non-City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2012 - 2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
43Packet Page 327 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Center
at Yost Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 –
$23,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
44Packet Page 328 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved
Trail/Bike Path/Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $10,000 $0
$10,000 $0 $10,000 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
45Packet Page 329 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Cultural Arts Facility
Needs Study
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initiate feasibility study of providing and promoting Cultural / Arts
facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high
priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008
update process.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for
public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority
creates the need to study performance, management and long term potential for arts related
facilities.
SCHEDULE:
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
46Packet Page 330 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Hatchery
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $160,000
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the
comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water
impacts. Continue to support day-lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway
repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible.
Hatchery repairs as needed. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget
Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co-fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water
Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant
funds available through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $50,000
Engin. & Admin.
Construction $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $10,000
47Packet Page 331 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park Forest
Management Study
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Hire consultant to develop a plan for best forest management
practices in Pine Ridge Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This forest park is under stress from over-mature trees
especially alder and others. This study will give the Parks Division necessary guidance to
better manage this park to become a more healthy forest and open space.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $50,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $50,000
48Packet Page 332 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
6
-
P
a
r
k
s
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
$4
1
6
,
8
4
9
$
3
1
2
,
4
8
8
$
3
1
0
,
9
0
0
$6
2
3
,
3
8
8
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
M
a
r
i
n
a
B
c
h
/
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
R
o
o
f
$1
8
2
,
9
2
8
$
1
8
2
,
5
3
8
$
1
8
1
,
6
7
3
$1
8
0
,
5
5
3
$1
8
4
,
1
7
8
$
1
8
2
,
2
9
3
$
1
8
5
,
1
5
3
$1
,
0
9
6
,
3
8
8
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
P
S
C
C
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
$6
8
,
0
8
0
$7
1
,
7
6
8
$
7
0
,
2
2
8
$6
8
,
6
0
8
$6
6
,
9
4
8
$
7
0
,
2
4
8
$
6
8
,
2
9
0
$4
1
6
,
0
9
0
De
p
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
F
A
C
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
$2
9
,
8
6
0
$2
9
,
6
2
4
$
2
9
,
7
6
3
$2
9
,
8
7
4
$2
9
,
9
5
7
$
2
9
,
6
2
1
$
2
9
,
6
4
0
$1
7
8
,
4
7
9
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
$
6
9
7
,
7
1
7
$
5
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
5
9
2
,
5
6
4
$
2
7
9
,
0
3
5
$
2
8
1
,
0
8
3
$
2
8
2
,
1
6
2
$
2
8
3
,
0
8
3
$
2
,
3
1
4
,
3
4
5
Mi
s
c
.
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
/
L
a
n
d
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
/
T
i
d
e
l
a
n
d
s
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$7
5
,
8
8
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
9
6
5
-
$
1
5
7
,
1
1
8
-
$
4
3
6
,
2
8
0
Re
a
l
e
s
t
a
t
e
T
a
x
1
/
4
%
/
1
s
t
Q
t
r
%
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$
6
7
5
,
8
8
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
2
3
,
9
6
5
$
4
4
5
,
8
8
2
$
1
6
3
,
7
2
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Lo
c
a
l
/
S
t
a
t
e
/
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
D
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
M
i
s
c
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
)
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
S
u
b
s
i
d
y
$1
2
1
,
8
3
7
$
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
9
2
,
5
6
4
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
&
S
u
b
s
i
d
y
$9
9
7
,
7
1
7
$
9
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
8
9
2
,
5
6
4
$
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
2
3
,
9
6
5
$
4
4
5
,
8
8
2
$
1
6
3
,
7
2
0
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
($
6
9
7
,
7
1
7
)
(
$
5
9
6
,
4
1
8
)
(
$
5
9
2
,
5
6
4
)
(
$
2
7
9
,
0
3
5
)
(
$
2
8
1
,
0
8
3
)
(
$
2
8
2
,
1
6
2
)
(
$
2
8
3
,
0
8
3
)
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
($
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
9
6
5
-
$
1
5
7
,
1
1
8
-
$
4
3
6
,
2
8
0
(
$
7
1
9
,
3
6
3
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
49Packet Page 333 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,146,126
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
City Hall: $417,000 (2010-2012), $312,000 (2013-2014), debt retired end of 2014
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $182,428
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $69,185
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $29,777
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $697,717 $596,418 $592,564 $279,035 $281,083 $282,162 $283,083
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
50Packet Page 334 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open
Space/Land
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens
that fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2012 – 2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
51Packet Page 335 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront/Tidelands
Acquisition
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire waterfront parcels and tidelands wherever feasible to
secure access to Puget Sound for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open
Space Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
52Packet Page 336 of 532
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
3
2
-
P
a
r
k
s
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
CF
P
2
0
1
2
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
)
4t
h
A
v
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
$0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
a
n
d
W
a
y
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
$
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
,
5
0
0
$5
5
,
5
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
l
a
z
a
$
1
6
8
,
0
0
0
$0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
3
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
/
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
$
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ha
z
e
l
M
i
l
l
e
r
P
l
a
z
a
(
O
l
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
)
$
9
5
,
1
2
0
$0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$
0
$
1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
M
a
r
k
e
t
(
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
)
$
0
$5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$6
3
4
,
1
2
0
$
1
,
8
8
7
,
5
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
1
2
,
5
6
2
,
5
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$8
6
,
6
0
2
$
3
0
9
,
2
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
$7
3
,
1
4
0
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$3
,
5
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$1
1
,
8
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$3
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
7
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$6
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
0
f
o
r
W
a
y
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
G
r
a
n
t
M
a
t
c
h
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
4
t
h
A
v
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
P
l
a
z
a
$1
3
5
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$3
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$9
5
,
6
1
1
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$1
3
,
9
5
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
O
l
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
e
n
d
i
n
g
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
($
8
5
,
1
4
3
)
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$3
8
2
,
9
6
0
$
8
3
3
,
7
1
3
$
4
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
8
20
1
2
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
20
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
4t
h
A
v
e
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
(
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
/
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
)
$1
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
l
a
z
a
(
A
r
t
s
F
e
s
t
.
F
o
u
n
d
.
/
H
u
b
b
a
r
d
T
r
u
s
t
/
E
d
i
n
B
l
o
o
m
)
$
3
2
,
5
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
C
M
A
Q
)
$
1
5
0
,
9
5
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
(
S
t
a
t
e
R
C
O
)
$
2
5
8
,
8
0
0
Ol
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
:
F
G
C
a
n
d
E
I
B
,
H
M
F
,
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
$
1
0
7
,
1
2
3
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$
5
6
0
,
3
7
3
$
1
1
,
5
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
4t
h
A
v
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
s
t
a
t
e
,
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
o
t
h
e
r
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
/
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
(
D
O
E
,
C
D
B
G
)
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
S
p
r
a
y
P
a
r
k
(
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
RC
O
S
t
a
t
e
g
r
a
n
t
/
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
R
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
T
o
u
r
i
s
m
f
o
r
W
a
y
-
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
M
a
r
k
e
t
(
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
)
$5
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
1
,
3
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
Gr
a
n
t
s
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
$5
6
0
,
3
7
3
$
1
,
3
5
6
,
5
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$9
4
3
,
3
3
3
$
2
,
1
9
0
,
2
1
3
$
5
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
1
,
4
5
2
,
7
1
3
$
1
,
7
2
7
,
7
1
3
$
8
,
2
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(6
3
4
,
1
2
0
.
0
0
)
(
$
1
,
8
8
7
,
5
0
0
)
(
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
(
1
,
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
(
$
1
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
7
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$3
0
9
,
2
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
$
3
0
2
,
7
1
3
*P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
1
%
f
o
r
A
r
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
-
2
0
1
8
53Packet Page 337 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 4th Avenue
Corridor Enhancement
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,600,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4th Avenue site development with temporary and/or moveable
surface elements and amenities to begin drawing attention and interest to the corridor and create
stronger visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Possible
projects may include surface art, interpretive signage and wayfinding, or low level lighting. The
Cultural Heritage Walking Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park
Service Preserve America grant program, will be implemented in 2011-12.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for
the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will
assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project
implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $25,000
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $100,000 $1,150,000 $1,425,000 $2,900,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $25,000 $100,000 $1,150,000 $1,425,000 $2,900,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
54Packet Page 338 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Cultural Heritage Tour and
Way-Finding Signage
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $74,500
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a downtown Edmonds walking tour highlighting a dozen historic
sites with artist made interpretive markers, and add way-finding signage for the downtown area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Promote tourism and economic development in the core
downtown. The walking tour and interpretive signage focuses on local history and as unique artist
made pieces also reflect the arts orientation of the community. Improved way-finding signage which
points out major attractions and services/amenities such as theaters, museums, beaches, train station,
shopping, dining and lodging promotes both tourism and economic vitality in the downtown /waterfront
activity center.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study $19,000 $55,500
Engineering & Administration
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $19,000 $55,500
55Packet Page 339 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton Street Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $168,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate small park and plaza at north end of old public works
building, 2nd & Dayton Street. Improve landscaping, plaza, and accessibility.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to public gathering space and
creation of additional art amenities and streetscape improvements in downtown on main
walking route. Financial support from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Hubbard Foundation
and Edmonds in Bloom.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $168,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $168,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
56Packet Page 340 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Interurban Trail
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,933,000
Matching Grant Funds WWRC/ IAC, additional funding from PSRC / CMAQ
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Trail Improvements
Major construction improvements to this abandoned interurban railway link including 1.37 miles of
trail, upgraded shared roadway, trail spur to Mathay Ballinger Park, and the creation of Ballinger
Station to house a shelter, kiosk, historical interpretation, water fountain and solar bollards.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Final trail system missing link to connect already completed
sections in Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace through the Ballinger neighborhood of Edmonds.
Increased safety and public enjoyment for recreationalists and bicycle commuters.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $352,000 $7,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $352,000 $7,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
57Packet Page 341 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Parking
Lot/Drainage
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate South County Senior Center parking lot including
pavement re-surfacing, storm water/drainage management, effective illumination and
landscaping. Seek grant opportunities and partnership opportunities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain capital assets and provide safety
and better accessibility for Seniors.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $500,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $500,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
58Packet Page 342 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hazel Miller Plaza (Old
Milltown)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $124,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Redevelop the small courtyard/gathering area in front of Old Milltown at 5th and Dayton. The site
is a key gateway into downtown. Elements of the design include raised bed gardens, artistic
elements, a water feature, seating areas, small stage/amphitheatre for performers, integration of
Old Milltown into the gathering area, large boulders for kids to climb on, and a look, smell, feel
educational garden area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
As a goal in the PROS plan, this project will develop a downtown gathering area, providing an
attractive gateway and entrance area to downtown.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2018
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $95,120
1% for Art
TOTAL $95,120
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
59Packet Page 343 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: City Park Revitalization
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Revitalize City Park play area with new play equipment and addition
of a spray park amenity to be used in the summer. Spray parks have become very popular in
many communities as replacements for wading pools that are no longer acceptable to increased
health department regulations. These installations create no standing water and therefore require
little maintenance and no lifeguard costs. Staff will seek voluntary donations for construction
costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project combines two play areas and the completion of
the master plan from 1992. This is very competitive for State grant funding, as it will be using a
repurposing water system. This will be a much valued revitalization and addition to the City’s
oldest and most cherished park.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $1,300,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,300,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
60Packet Page 344 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown
Waterfront)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public
market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community
gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a
valuable asset to Edmonds.
SCHEDULE:
This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners
willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished
by 2017.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5m
61Packet Page 345 of 532
FUND PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
112 5th Ave S Overlay from Elm Way to Walnut St.Overlay 5th Ave from Walnut St. to Elm Way, where a new water line was
recently added. The project is funded by a $551,000 federal grant and City
water utility funds.
112 SR-524 (196th St. SW) @ 88th Ave. W Guardrail Install a guardrail on the west side of the intersection due a 10' vertical drop.
112 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave. S X Install sidewalk along this stretch to improve non-motorized transportation
conditions.
112 Citywide Pedestrian Countdown Display Install Pedestrian Countdown Display, indiciating the number of seconds
remaining for the pedestrian.
112 Audible Pedestrian Signals Install Audible Pedestrian Sigals at busy signalized interserctions.
112 SR-104 Pedestrian Midblock crossing Add mid-block pedestrian crossing ~ 400' north of SR-104 @ Pine St.
112 Citywide Bicycle Connections Create bicycle connections throughout the City.
116 Anderson Center Boiler Repairs Controls repairs and boiler inspector requirements for continued insurance
coverage.
116 Misc. Fire Sprinkler System Repairs Replacement of painted sprinkler heads and required inspection, repair, and
certification of fire department connections at four locations.
116 Public Safety Railings Installation of metal safety railings at two locations at the north end of the
Police Department.
412-100 Pioneer Way Road Repair/Monitoring Estimated cost to monitor roadway and slope that was damaged during the
watermain break that happened on Pioneer Way in December 2011.
412-100 2019 Replacement Program Estimated future costs for waterline replacements.
412-200 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Current Plan completed in 2010. New plan will be needed in 2015
412-200 Storm System Video Assessment Assessment of entire storm sytem in 2014. Results will feed into capital project
needs in Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Planfor 2015.
412-300 2018 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Impr Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements.
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2012 TO 2013)
ADDED PROJECTS
112
112
Convert EB and WB movements from split phasing to protected - permissive
phasing, with the addition of left turn lanes.
Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements X
Type 2 Raised Pavement Markers Add Type 2 Raised Pavement Markers along the centerline
of collectors and arterials
10/11/2012
Packet Page 346 of 532
FUND PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
112 2009 Overlay Completed in 2011
112 Dayton St. Overlay Completed in 2011
112 SR-524 Walkway X Completed in 2011
116 FAC Energy Project Study Completed last year.
116 EV Charging Stations Completed last year.
116 Library ADA Doors Completed last year.
116 Wade James Gutter Replacement
Additional capital repairs determined in 2012 to be the financial responsibility
of the Driftwood Players according to lease terms.
116 Wade James Theater Roof Minor repairs completed last year.
125 Park Impact Fee Study Not allowable use of REET
132 Old Milltown Completed
412-100 System-wide Pressure Relief Improvements Added to 2013 & 2014 Replacement Program since these projects are done as
part of the Replacement Program.
412-100 Annual PRV Station Improvement Program Added to Replacement Program for each respective year since these projects
are done as part of the Replacement Program.
412-100 Fire Hydrant Improvements, General Fund Added to Replacement Program for each respective year since these projects
are done as part of the Replacement Program.
412-100 GFC Study Completed in 2011
412-100 5 Corners Pump Station Improvements Completed in 2011
412-100 BNSF Crossings Completed in 2011
412-100 Alderwood Meter, Seaview & Yost Impr Completed in 2011
412-200 NPDES Phase II Permit Capacity Buliding Grant dollars will be used for operational needs not capital needs.
412-200 Public Works Yard Water Quality Upgrades Vehicle wash station deleted. City constructed a wash station using
operational dollars and Ecology grant money at a fraction of the estimated
capital cost.
412-300 Lift Stations 7 & 8 and West Dayton Sewer Completed in 2011
412-300 GFC Study Completed in 2011
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2012 TO 2013)
DELETED PROJECTS
10/11/2012
Packet Page 347 of 532
FUND PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
112 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements
X
The following was added to the scope: the overlay on 228th St. SW from 80th
Ave. W to ~ 1,000 east of 72nd Ave. W (part of stretch in Mountlake Terrace)
and on 76th Ave. from 228th St. SW to SR-99.
112 212th St. SW/84th Ave (Five Corners) Roundabout X
The replacement of the existing waterline within the project limits was added
to the scope of the project.
113 Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility
X
The project has been separated into two projects. Project 1A will be the
Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility. Project 1B will construct
a vehicle/pedestrian underpass to the existing ferry terminal.
116 Anderson Center Accessibility
Because of design and estimation work completed, expected project cost has
been raised to $150,000.
116 Anderson Center Roof
This project has been delayed a year on the CIP and its cost has been better
defined by design and estimation work.
125 Woodway Fields X Starting to set aside for field development
125 Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow/Cr -
Feasibility Study
Carry over to 2013
125 City Park Play Area Revitallization Carry over and additional allocation to match state grant
412-200 Public Works Yard Water Quality Upgrades Grant received from Ecology to upgrade Waste Handling Facility. This work will
be done in 2012-2013.
412-200
Northstream Culvert Abandonmetn south of Puget
Dr.- Assement An assesment will conducted first to see if a stuctural abandoment is necessary
412-200 Perinville High Flow Reduction Study
Was "SW Perrinville Creek Basin Study." Project has been expanded to the
entire basin, including the part in Lynnwood.
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2012 TO 2013)
CHANGED PROJECTS
Southwest Edmonds Basin Study Projects 1 & 3 -
Connect Sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park
Infiltration System with Rain Gardens and Replace
Infiltration pipe (near 107th Pl W).
Low Impact Development Retrofit Project/95th/93rd
St. Drainage Improvement Project.
Add system to reduce flood frequency. Project will use Low Impact
Development to manage stormwater instead of convential stormwater
management techniques (pipes and catch basins).
412-200
412-200
X
X
SW Edmonds Projects 1 and 3 combined for efficiency. Rain gardens added to
projects to improve stormwater quality.
10/11/2012
Packet Page 348 of 532
DRAFT
Subject to October 24th Approval
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
October 10, 2012
Vice Chair Stewart called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 – 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Valerie Stewart, Vice Chair
Kevin Clarke
Todd Cloutier
Bill Ellis
John Reed
Neil Tibbott
Ian Duncan
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Philip Lovell, Chair
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Development Services Director
Gina Janicek, Planner
Kernen Lien, Planner
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Manager
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director
Karin Noyes, Recorder
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
BOARD MEMBER REED MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 28, 2012 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED.
BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, recalled that at the their last meeting, the Board considered proposed language from the City
Attorney that would note the distinction between the Harbor Square property and the other properties located within the
Downtown Master Plan District of the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. The City Attorney’s recommended language
recognized that what is done at Harbor Square could influence later actions on the remaining properties in the district, mainly
allowing the same height. She noted that this language does not appear to have been included in any of the documents that
were provided for the Board’s continued discussion tonight. If the Board recommends approval of the Harbor Square Master
Plan, their recommendation should include some details as to why this property is different from the others in the district.
PUBLIC HEARING ON FILE NUMBER PLN20120029 – A Type IV-B rezone proposal to change the zoning
designation on three parcels from Single-Family Residential (RS-8) to Multi-Family Residential (RM-2.4). The
Comprehensive Plan designation for these properties was amended last year from “Single Family Urban 1 to Multi
Family Medium Density. The sites are located at 8609, 8611 and 8615 – 244th Street Southwest. (Applicants: Sid
Odgers and Ken Darwin)
Ms. Janicek displayed a zoning map to illustrate the location and current zoning of the subject properties. She reminded the
Board that these are the same properties they reviewed last year as part of a Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal. The
Packet Page 349 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 2
Board recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use designation from Single Family
Urban 1 to Multi Family Medium Density, and the City Council adopted the amendment as proposed. The applicants are
now proposing to change the zoning from Single Family Residential (RS-8) to Multiple Residential (RM-2.4) to correspond
with the Comprehensive Plan designation that was amended last year.
Ms. Janicek reported that no written public comments were received regarding the application, and no concerns were raised
by City departments. She received one telephone call from a neighbor indicating support of the application and suggesting
that both a preschool and a grocery store would be appropriate uses for the subject properties. She informed the citizen that
while day cares would be permitted in the proposed new zone, a grocery store would not.
Ms. Janicek referred to Page 3 of the Staff report, which provides a comparison of the different zoning designations (RS-8,
RM-2.4 and RM-3). She noted that both the RM-2.4 and RM-3 zoning designations are compatible with the Multi Family
Medium Density land use designation. She reminded the Board that the applicant originally proposed a Multi-Family High
Density land use designation, but this was not approved. She pointed out that the multi-family medium density zones provide
a transitional buffer between the General Commercial (CG) zone along the Highway 99 Corridor and the single-family
residential zones. She said staff recommends approval of the rezone as proposed.
Board Member Reed recalled that there is an uphill slop as you approach the subject properties. Ms. Janicek said the subject
properties are located at the top of the hill and are quite flat.
Sid Odgers, Applicant, said he is one of the three property owners, and has lived on his property for 34 years. He explained
that, over the years, the properties around him have all been redeveloped with two-story newer homes and condominiums.
The houses on the three subject properties are all single-story and no longer fit into the character of the area. Because the
properties are located adjacent to a condominium development, the property owners felt it would be nice to develop their
properties as multi-family, as well. They believe the subject properties are an excellent location for multi-family
development. They have good drainage, are relative flat, and very little soil would have to be removed to accommodate
construction.
The public portion of the hearing was closed.
BOARD MEMBER CLARKE MOVED THAT THE PLANNING BOARD FORWARD FILE NUMBER
PLN20120029 TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO BE CONSISTENT
WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT THAT WAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL LAST
YEAR. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARING ON FILE NUMBER AMD20120007 – Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element update for 2013 –
2018 to City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2013 – 2018. The proposal
updates the City’s CFP to include improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of City infrastructure such as
transportation, parks, and stormwater along with other public facilities necessary to implement the City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. English presented the proposed Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the years 2013 –
2018. He noted that Mr. Clifton, Ms. Hite and Mr. Shuster also contributed to the draft document before the Board and were
present to answer questions.
Mr. English reviewed that the CIP is budget driven. The information in the CIP helps staff prepare and develop projected
capital needs for the upcoming year. The CFP is mandated by the Growth Management Act (GMA) and is an element of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. Both documents have a six year horizon, and the CFP goes beyond to a 20-year horizon for
most elements. Both plans include capital projects, and the CIP includes maintenance projects, as well.
Mr. English advised that the CFP includes three project sections: general (parks, buildings and regional projects),
transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian/bicycle projects), and stormwater. He said the proposed CFP includes the
following changes:
Packet Page 350 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 3
• The Main Street Undercrossing Project is a mini version of the Edmonds Crossing Multi-Modal Project for the ferry
terminal. The project would provide a crossing under Main Street to connect the ferry holding lanes to the loading dock
at Main Street. There would be a grade separation between the transportation modes. Funding is proposed in the CFP
for an initial study of what the project might look like and the associated costs. The initial cost estimate is between $60
million to $80 million. This smaller project would address not only the ferry access issue at Main Street, but it would
also provide emergency access to properties located on the west side of the railroad tracks.
• The State Route (SR) 99 and 212th Street Intersection Project has been included in the 20-year CFP for a number of
years, and has been moved to the list of 6-year projects in an effort to prepare future grant applications for funding. The
project would add westbound and eastbound left turn lanes to improve the level of service (LOS) at the intersection.
Mr. English explained that the CIP has two project sections: general and parks. It is organized by the City’s financial fund
numbers and identifies preliminary estimates on six-year expenditures and revenues. He provided a chart to illustrate the
various fund numbers, the types of projects in each, and the department that is responsible to oversee each fund. He pointed
out that even with a limited amount of City funds available for transportation improvements, the City has been able to secure
a significant amount of grant funding to complete large projects. He specifically referred to the 112 Street Fund and
highlighted the list of projects the City is actively pursuing as follows:
• Construction is currently underway on the Main Street Project, which is expected to be completed by November 19th.
Two grants (federal and state) were secured for the project, with some utility money as they are in the process of
replacing a water line and adding stormwater improvements. The infrastructure between 5th Avenue and 6th Avenue will
be rebuilt, and new sidewalks and street lighting would be installed. The project also includes a mid block pedestrian
crossing.
• The City received a Federal Transportation Grant for the 5th Street Overlay Project. A water line on 5th Avenue was
replaced last year, and the roadway is currently patched. This project is scheduled to take place in 2013 and will provide
a complete curb-to-curb overlay of this section of the roadway.
• The Five Corners Roundabout is currently in the design phase, and right-of-way acquisition will start soon. The
project is scheduled for completion in 2013.
• Design for Phase 3 of the SR 99 Lighting Project will start in 2013.
• The City received grant funding to begin the design and right-of-way acquisition for the 228th Street Corridor
Improvement Project (between 76th Avenue and SR99).
• Preliminary design work was just completed for the 212th Street and 76th Avenue Improvement Project, and they will
move into final design and environmental review in 2013.
Board Member Ellis asked Mr. English to provide more information about “level of service” (LOS) and explain how it is
used to justify projects in the CFP. Mr. English said LOS is a transportation term that measures how well traffic moves
through an intersection and/or corridor, LOS A being the best and LOS F being the worst. There are different ways to
measure LOS, but it is usually a measurement of how long it takes a car to pass through an intersection. To determine how
an intersection behaves, the City collects traffic counts and enters them into a modeling software that gives information on
LOS. From the modeling information, the City can project what the LOS will be at an intersection based on the
Comprehensive Plan and the anticipated growth. He said the City’s current LOS standard is Level D, which was set by the
City Council after evaluating LOS as part of the 2009 Transportation Master Plan update. The Transportation Master Plan
will be updated again in 2015.
Board Member Tibbott asked where the 5th Avenue Overlay Project would begin and end. Mr. English answered that it
would start at Walnut Street and end at Elm Street.
Packet Page 351 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 4
Board Member Tibbott asked if it is correct to assume the City has all the funds in place for the projects identified in the CFP
for 2013. Mr. English answered that funding has been secured for the 5th Avenue overlay, the signal cabinet improvements,
and the Five Corners roundabout. They have funding for design and right-of-way acquisition for the 212th and 76th Avenue
Improvements, but not for construction. The design and right-of-way acquisition is the initial step in preparing the City to
apply for grant funding for construction.
Mr. English noted that 412 Utility funds are used for water, sewer and stormwater projects. He described the 2012 and
proposed 2013 projects as follows:
• Water Utility Fund. By the end of 2012, the City will have replaced 3,800 feet of water mains, and they plan to replace
10,000 feet in 2013. The City also completed 2,000 linear feet of roadway affected by previous waterline replacement
projects.
• Sewer Utility Fund. The City was awarded a $4.5 million grant to rehabilitate nine sewer lift stations, which is a much
needed improvement to help minimize the maintenance efforts needed to keep the stations operational. The City plans to
replace and/or rehabilitate 5,600 feet of sewer main in 2013 and 1,000 feet of CIPP sewer mains. The Sewer
Comprehensive Plan will also be updated in 2013.
• Stormwater Utility Fund. Drainage improvements on North Talbot Road were completed in August to correct a
drainage problem associated with the Lynnwood Treatment Plant. Another drainage improvement is currently underway
on Talbot Road next to Perrinville Creek. The City began a study of the Edmonds Marsh, which should be completed by
the end of 2012 or early 2013. The City will replace 3,300 feet of storm drain pipe in the Edmonds Basin along 238th
Street and 100th Avenue. The vactor waste handling facility will be upgraded in 2013 to handle more waste and allow
the City to increase the frequency of cleaning catch basins. This should improve the quality of water flowing into the
creeks and Puget Sound. A high flow reduction study of Perrinville Creek and a drainage study of the Dayton Street and
SR 104 intersection will be completed in 2013.
Ms. Hite shared the following highlights:
• Park CIP 2012 Highlights. The Interurban Trail and Hazel Miller Plaza were completed. There was a groundbreaking
for the SR 99 International District Lighting Enhancement Project, and progress has been made on the 4th Avenue
Cultural Corridor Improvement Project. The design and construction documents have been prepared for the Dayton
Street Plaza Project and construction will begin in the next few weeks.
• Parks CFP Highlights. A public market project was added to the CFP, and the City is planning and setting aside money
in the CFP for improvements at the Woodway High School Athletic Complex.
• Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) 125 Highlights. REET funds were set aside in 2012 to replace the boiler at Yost Pool.
They were unable to complete this project as the funds were needed for other urgent repairs to get through the 2012
season. In 2013, $120,000 has been set aside for the boiler project. Funding for the City Park Playground Replacement
Project will be carried over into 2013 so that the project can be done in conjunction with the Spray Pad Project. The City
has submitted an application for a Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) Grant for the combined project, and they
are hoping to obtain funding in the next budget cycle in July. REET funds, as well as stormwater utility funds, are being
used for the Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study to consider the potential of daylighting Willow Creek to improve fish
passage. Money has also been set aside for the Woodway High School athletic fields, replacement of the Mathay
Ballinger play equipment, a park impact fee study, and an update to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
• Park Construction Fund 132. Capital dollars have been moved into this fund to provide matching funds for grants to
construct projects. Projects identified for funding include the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project, the Dayton Street
Plaza, and the City Park Spray and Play Revitalization Project. Matching funds have also been set aside for Senior
Center Improvements if the City is able to secure a Community Development Block Grant.
Board Member Reed requested additional information about the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project. Ms. Hite said money
has been set aside for this project. Francis Chapin, Cultural Services Manager, has worked with property owners along the
Packet Page 352 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 5
corridor and historians in an attempt to capture the history of the corridor. The next step is to conduct a survey and secure
grant funding for project construction.
Mr. English advised that the draft CIP/CFP was introduced to the City Council on October 2nd, and is scheduled for a public
hearing before the City Council on October 16th. The goal is for the CFP to be adopted in December as part of the
Comprehensive Plan Update.
Board Member Reed recalled that, as part of their review of the Harbor Square Master Plan, citizens expressed concern about
traffic congestion at the intersection of SR 104 and Dayton Street. When cars are backed up at this intersection, people living
in the Point Edwards development have difficulty accessing the highway because there is no light at their access point.
Citizens have expressed concern that redevelopment at Harbor Square will increase congestion, yet no project has been
identified in the Transportation Master Plan to solve this problem. He asked if the City has any plans to address this problem
in the near future. He also asked if the City has plans in place to address the increased traffic associated with redevelopment
at Westgate and Five Corners. Mr. English pointed out that the proposed roundabout at Five Corners is anticipated to bring
the LOS at the intersection to Level B, which should be sufficient to handle future redevelopment. He acknowledged there
are no traffic improvements planned on SR 104 in the Westgate area at this time. However, the City has conducted a high-
level transportation evaluation of this area to identify potential traffic impacts to the intersection based on the proposed
zoning changes. The evaluation concluded that there would not be a lot of change. However, as development progresses, the
intersection will need to be studied in greater detail. The evaluation will be presented to the Board in a few weeks as part of
their work session on the Westgate Plan and form-based code.
Board Member Clarke requested additional information about the transportation evaluation for the Westgate area. Mr.
English explained that the study looked at what the University of Washington proposed for both Westgate and Five Corners.
It evaluates how the proposed land use changes would impact traffic patterns in the area. The study anticipates the number of
additional trips that would be generated based on the proposed zoning changes and updates the transportation model
accordingly. It provides some suggestions for how the traffic patterns could be modified at the intersection, but it does not
go into detail about specific improvements.
Board Member Clarke said that, in his professional capacity, he has studied mixed-use developments in a variety of
communities and cannot find any that have three to five-story buildings located on major arterials with speed limits up to 35
miles per hour. He observed that the University of Washington team did not address safety related to the speed limits on SR
104 and 100th Avenue West. He asked if the City intends to conduct a traffic study to look at the public safety issues related
to ingress and egress from a mixed-use development that has high-density lot coverage and no setbacks from the street. Mr.
English answered that the transportation evaluation does not reach that level of detail. A more detailed study would be
required as part of a development proposal to address traffic impacts, safety, line of site, etc. He said he does not anticipate
the City would conduct a more in-depth study prior to a development proposal.
Mr. Chave clarified that the transportation evaluation studied the level of development, level of traffic and proposed public
improvements to determine if the existing street system, in its current configuration, would be adequate for the proposed level
of redevelopment. The basic conclusion was redevelopment at the level suggested in the Westgate Plan would not result in
the need for significant transportation improvements. He clarified that the University of Washington team has recommended
setbacks in the Westgate Plan to expand the public space. However, he acknowledged the buildings would be pushed
towards the sidewalks and parking would be located elsewhere. The buildings would be more prominent, but setbacks would
still be required.
Board Member Clarke pointed out that the City is obligated to study traffic safety issues related to future development. Mr.
English said the City studies traffic safety as it relates to accident history. If there is a high level of accident history, the City
may consider improvements to address the problem.
Board Member Tibbott asked staff to review the major capital and maintenance projects that must be deferred in 2013 and
2014 as a result of insufficient funding. Mr. English responded that while the City has secured funds for environmental
review and design of the 212th Street and 76th Avenue Improvement Project, they have not secured construction funding.
They are hoping to obtain grant funding in 2014 or 2015 to move forward with this project to address a LOS issue. The SR
99 and 212th Street Improvement Project has been pushed to 2016. As matching local dollars become available, the City
Packet Page 353 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 6
would apply for grant funding to move forward with the project. Improvements at the intersection of 220th Street and SR 99
have also been pushed out. However, he indicated that street preservation is the City’s most significant need at this time.
Right now, the City does not have any funding for overlays and pavement upgrades.
Board Member Tibbott asked if the City has funding to move forward with walkway improvements. Mr. English said the
City tries to capitalize on grant funding to complete walkway improvements. He noted that walkways have been prioritized
in the 2009 Transportation Master Pan, and the City tries to follow this plan when applying for grant funding. However,
there are times when the City pursues a lower-priority sidewalk project because it better fits a potential grant opportunity.
Board Member Tibbott asked to what extent the City needs matching funds to obtain grant dollars. Mr. English said
matching funds is an important component of any grant application. While federal grants only require a minimum match of
between 0 and 13.5%, grant applications score higher if the City can provide a greater percentage of matching funds.
Ms. Hite said that because of insufficient funding, the City has been unable to replace their playground equipment at the rate
they should. While staff has maintained the equipment so it is safe, it is not up to current playground standards. While funds
are dedicated each year to bicycle/walkway improvements, they are unable to develop new trails and the existing trails are
not well connected. The updated Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan will do a better job of connecting trails throughout
the park system, especially connecting the Interurban Trail to the waterfront. While the City does a good job of patching
sport courts and trails, there is insufficient funding to resurface these facilities to bring them up to current standards.
Ms. Hite reminded the Board that the City went through a public process to plan for an aquatic center. The option selected
by participating community members and ultimately adopted by the City Council was to include an indoor pool facility at the
Yost site. The City has completed a conceptual design for this project, but there is insufficient funding to move forward. She
also pointed out that the City’s lease with the Edmonds School District for the Civic Stadium property expires in 2020, and
the school district has indicated they are not interested in selling the property at this time. They are interested in getting fair
market value on the lease of the land. The City and district have discussed the option of a long-term lease that would interest
the City in investing capital dollars to upgrade the site so it can be used for other events besides large festivals and some
soccer. She noted that this property is an asset to the community and it would be fabulous to bring it into the City’s assets.
Ms. Hite said some money has been set aside for the Woodway High School Athletic Field Project. She recalled that through
a public process, it was determined that the site would be redeveloped into two soccer and one baseball field. She said in
recent years, a group of 20 community members have met to discuss the need for more sports fields. While the proposed new
fields at Woodway High School will help fulfill this need, it will not improve the City’s ability to host regional tournaments.
Recent discussions with the school district have brought forward the idea of maintaining the connecting walkway around the
area, but developing three or four full-sized soccer fields instead. While the school district has a need for a baseball field, it
would be hard for the City to justify a lot of capital dollars for just two soccer fields and one baseball field. They have
discussed with the school district the idea of locating a new baseball field at the Civic Stadium site for high schools and
perhaps a semi-professional team to use.
Ms. Hite said the City is in the process of conducting a study of the Edmonds Marsh, which has included a lot of discussion
about daylighting Willow Creek to create a fish passage into the marsh. The project has a three to five-year window, and
some grant funding is available. She noted that daylighting Willow Creek would likely involve changes to Marina Beach
Park.
Board Member Clarke asked how the City determines which parks have Honey Buckets. Ms. Hite said the City tries to put
Honey Buckets in parks that have the most traffic, which tends to be community and regional parks. They are also placed in
parks that have significant field use.
Board Member Clarke recalled that the City approved a proposal to name the playground at Hickman Park after J.P. Patches,
who recently passed away. He suggested that rather than the current small marker, the City should install a plaque that is
more visible and provides more information about J.P. Patches. Ms. Hite agreed that, at the direction of the Planning Board,
the City could do something to honor him in a larger way.
Packet Page 354 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 7
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, suggested the City needs to further evaluate the SR104 and Dayton Street intersection, as well as
traffic on Edmonds Way. He suggested they particularly discuss how the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) contributes to the problem. Because Edmonds Way is the corridor to the ferry terminal, it becomes congested and
sometimes gridlocked. A number of problems are created by the major highway that goes through the middle of the City.
Mr. Hertrich expressed his belief that it would be impossible to construct an access under the railroad tracks. There is not
enough space to create lead in and lead out and still have room for the ferry dock and businesses on Main Street. He
suggested that WSDOT should be the lead agency for addressing access under the tracks to the ferry terminal, and not the
City.
Mr. Hertrich advised that on numerous occasions, he has raised the idea of using chip seal to rehabilitate roadways instead of
more costly overlays. This approach has been used successfully by both Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace, but it has not
been considered an option in Edmonds. He suggested the City complete a study to identify the roadways for which a chip
seal application would be appropriate. Chip seal offers a less costly way of protecting and enhancing the life of the
roadways. He asked that the Board endorse the idea and add it as a new item in the CIP.
Mr. Hertrich voiced concern that the Westgate Plan prepared by the University of Washington team did not address traffic at
all. He said he drives through the intersection at 9th and SR 104 often. He has found it very difficult to make a right turn
from SR 104 to head north on 9th Avenue, particularly during peak times. He suggested that adding another right turn lane at
this intersection would improve the efficiency of the intersection, but it is not identified in the proposed CIP. He suggested
the Board consider this option as they review the Westgate Plan so that adequate space can be provided.
Mr. Hertrich said he participated in the aquatic center study. The group discussed the option of locating an aquatic facility at
the Woodway High School site, but the school district opposed the idea. He said he finds it ironic that the school district is
now asking the City to help construct athletic fields when they were unwilling to work with the City to provide a good
location for a larger pool facility. He suggested that the Board recommend that the new aquatic center and Woodway High
School athletic field projects be combined.
Mr. Hertrich noted that a number of intersections have been identified by the City for potential traffic lights, but nothing has
been done. Future redevelopment can be held up until the city addresses the low LOS at each of these intersections.
The public portion of the hearing was closed.
Board Member Stewart said she lives on Cedar Street, which is a dead end street one block south of Walnut Street on the east
side of 9th Avenue. She noted that it is becoming increasingly difficult to make a left turn from Cedar Street onto 9th Avenue
because traffic backs up on Walnut Street all the way past Cedar Street. Mr. English said the 2009 Transportation Master
Plan indicates that both the Main Street and 9th Avenue and Walnut Street and 9th Avenue intersections have LOS problems,
and traffic signals are identified in the long-range plan to address the situations. To address the problem on a short-term
basis, the City plans to restripe the intersection at 9th Avenue and Walnut before the weather changes to provide for two
approach lanes in either direction on 9th Avenue. This striping change should improve the LOS at the intersection and
address concerns about traffic backing up beyond Cedar Street.
Board Member Clarke questioned why there is a four-way stop at the intersection of 9th Avenue and Walnut Street. Because
cars rarely cross 9th Avenue in this location, it would be better to place a stop sign on the east/west street only. Mr. English
said he doesn’t know the history of this four-way stop, but it is likely that people on Walnut Street did not have an
opportunity to enter 9th Avenue during peak times because of high traffic volumes. The four-way stop provides a break in
traffic. He noted that a recent study found the intersection to be operating at an LOS D, and the striping improvements
should improve the LOS to B.
Board Member Cloutier invited staff to comment on Mr. Hertrich’s suggestion that chip seal is a less costly option for street
maintenance. Mr. English pointed out that the City’s current and proposed CIP does not include any funding for street
preservation, whether it be chip seal or overlays. Chip seal is one alternative the City could use if funding becomes available,
but it is not an option for all streets. The better conditioned roadways can receive chip seal, which is a surface treatment that
lasts between 10 and 15 years. However, an overlay treatment has a structural component with a life span of between 20 and
Packet Page 355 of 532
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2012 Page 8
25 years. He summarized that the chip seal treatment is one tool in the preservation tool box, but it is not an application that
can be applied across the board to eliminate the need for street overlays.
BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN AND CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF
APPROVAL. BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT SECONDED THE MOTION.
Board Member Reed observed that it is unfortunate that over the past few years the City has had to postpone or eliminate
important projects because of insufficient funding. He noted that significant funding is still needed for the projects identified
for 2014. He reminded the Board that although the City Council considered the creation of a Transportation Benefit District,
it was never approved. The City must figure out a way to solve this problem.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Packet Page 356 of 532
AM-5178 8.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted By:Michael Clugston
Department:Planning
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Final plat and PRD for Stonebridge Court at 7723 & 7807 220th St. SW (PLN20070020 and
PLN20070021).
Recommendation
Approve the resolution (Exhibit 8) in preparation for recording of the plat with the Snohomish County
Auditor.
Previous Council Action
None
Narrative
Final plat/PRDs are Type IV-A decisions made by Council according to ECDC Chapters 20.01 and
20.75. Attached are the following related documents:
Exhibit 1 - Vicinity map
Exhibit 2 - Final plat/PRD drawings
Exhibit 3 - Conditions, covenants and restrictions proposed by the applicant for the homeowner's
association
Exhibit 4 - Hearing Examiner's September 11, 2007 decision
Exhibit 5 - Hearing Examiner's December 22, 2012 remand decision
Exhibit 6 - Engineering approval letter
Exhibit 7 - Draft notice of final decision
Exhibit 8 - Resolution approving the final plat and PRD
Of note, the final plat/PRD documents in Exhibit 2 are not signed by the Directors of Public Works
Director and Development Services. Staff has the accompanying mylar copies with the required
signatures.
The applicant has completed all of the requirements of the preliminary plat/PRD approval or, in the case
of some Engineering and Planning Division requirements, a performance bond has been posted to ensure
completion (Exhibits 6 & 7). Since all the conditions and requirements of the preliminary plat/PRD have
been completed or provided for, the final plat and PRD should be approved.
Once approved, the Mayor will sign the final plat, the Clerk will file the plat with the County Auditor,
Packet Page 357 of 532
and staff will issue the notice of final decision in accordance with ECDC 20.06.009.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 - Vicinty Map
Exhibit 2 - Stonebridge Court final plat
Exhibit 3 - Stonebridge Court CCRs
Exhibit 4 - HE decision 9/11/07
Exhibit 5 - HE remand decision 12/22/11
Exhibit 6 - Engineering approval
Exhibit 7 - draft notice of decision
Exhibit 8 - Resolution approving plat/PRD
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 10:49 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/11/2012 10:54 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 11:10 AM
Form Started By: Michael Clugston Started On: 10/08/2012 08:44 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/11/2012
Packet Page 358 of 532
Golden
Leaves
STEVENS PARK
LEGEND
ESTATES
WEST
ISLE
ST
E
V
E
N
S
F
A
M
I
L
Y
HE
A
L
T
H
C
A
R
E
2 1 7 0 8
HO
L
L
Y
H
A
V
E
N
E.R.
STEVEN'S
HEALTH
CENTER
DOUG'S
MAZDA
21919
7514
77
1
5
A,
B
,
C
7806
7804
7 8 1 5
7 9 0 9
7 9 0 5
21617
7 9 0 3
79
2
1
79
2
5
21727
2 1 6 0 1
21615
21701
7924 7906
21721
220067710
2
2
0
1
9
22029
22118
22110
22124
22106
2181521825
2182821824
21816
7 7 11
7623
7621
7 6 1 9
2 1 9 1 6
21818
21814
22115
2 2 1 0 922104
22020
22212
22206
7 6 2 2
7 6 2 5
7 6 1 5
7 6 0 7
22028
8010
8 0 0 6
21831
7923
21919
21913
21905
21829
22009
2 2 0 3 5
7 4 3 07512
7516
7523
7512
22015
22021
75
2
2
22121
21807
7631
21710
21706
21712
7 6 0 3
7 6 0 9
7 6 1 5
21911
21827
21823
21819
21817
7 6 1 8
7702
7704
7706
7708
2
2
1
2
7
7 6 2 4
22024
22018
22012
2 2 1 2 2
2 2 1 0 2
21821
21815 7910
7908 7 7 2 6
21818
21820
7 8 0 7
7 7 2 3
7 8 1 7
7 8 2 3
7 8 3 1
7 9 11
8005
8005
21906
21822
21822
21810 21807
78
1
3
7811
7
8
0
9
7809
22005
2 2 1 3 3
22130
7 5 1 9
7 5 0 5
7 5 1 2
7 5 1 8
2 2 0 3 0
7 8 0 4
7 8 0 6
7808
2
2
0
2
3
7 8 1 5
7 8 1 1
7 7 2 5
2 2 0 1 8
22008
2 2 0 2 8
7812
7 8 1 6
2
2
1
0
8
2
2
1
1
6
2
2
1
2
6
22025
7803
7807
78
2
1
7 8 1 7
22128
22118
22112
22105
7 9 0 7
22101
7 9 1 5
7 9 2 5
2
2
1
1
5
22105
7922
22017
22023
79
1
4
22
0
2
7
78
3
0
7 8 1 022006
22014
2 2 0 2 2
22026
22015
22005
7710
21616
7702
21727
2170121
7
0
8
21
7
0
6
21713
21705
7 7 1 8
2 1 6 2 6
2161221615
2
1
6
2
32163021624
21616
8 0 0 0
8 0 1 0
21
7
1
4
21710
21620
21616
21612
78
3
1
1
/
2
7808
7810
21615
21920
7506
222ND ST SWW
SW
8 0 T H A
V
E W
76
T
H
A
V
E
W
7 7 T H P L W
7 8 T H A
219TH ST SW
7 8 T H P L W
218TH ST SW
7 7 T H P L W
7 8 T H P L W
7 6 T H P L W
7 9 T H A
7 7 T H A V E W
221ST PL SW
W
7
6 T H
220TH ST SW
218TH ST SW
8 0 T H A V E W
SHT 13
SEC 30
SHT 14
SEC 29
10/8/2012
9:09:21 AM
¯
1 inch = 225 feetCity of Edmonds
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA
98020
This document is for general information purposes only and is provided on an 'as is'
and 'as available' basis. The data used comes from a variety of public sources and no
warranty of any kind is given as to its accuracy. Users of this document agree
to indemnify and save harmless the City of Edmonds, its officials, officers,
employees and/or agents from and against any claim, demand or action, arising
out of any use or possession of this document .
0 340 680170
Feet
City of Edmonds
Mapbook
Edmonds Right of Way (August 2012)
STATUS
ACTIVE
Status
ACTIVE
ZONING
Single Family
RS-6 Sin gle Family, 6,000 sq. ft. lots
RS-8 Sin gle Family, 8,000 sq. ft. lots
RS-10 Sin gle Family, 10,000 sq . ft. lots
RS-12 Sin gle Family, 12,000 sq . ft. lots
RSW-12 Wate rfront Single Family, 12,00 0 sq. ft. lots
RS-20 Sin gle Family, 20,000 sq . ft. lots
RS-MP Sin gle Family, Master Plan
Multi Family
RM-3 Multi Family, 3,000 sq. ft. of lot area per unit
RM-2.4 Multi Family, 2,400 sq. ft. of lot area per unit
RM-1.5 Multi Family, 1,500 sq. ft. of lot area per unit
RM-EW Multi Family, RM-Ed mon ds Way
Downtown Business((BD1 Downto wn Retail Core((BD2 Downto wn Mixed Commercia l((BD3 Downto wn Con ve nience Commercial((BD4 Downto wn Mixed Residential((BD5 Downto wn Arts Corridor((OR Office-Reside ntia l
Commercial
BP Pla nned Bu siness!!BN Neighborho od Business
FVMU Firdale Village Mixed Use
BC Community Busine ss
BC-EW Community Busine ss, BC-Edmonds Wa y
CG General Commercial
CG2 General Commercial
Waterfront
CW Commercial Waterfron t
MP1 Master Plan Hillside Mixe d Use
MP2 Master Plan Hillside Mixe d Use
Other
MU Medica l Use
P Public Use
OS Open Space
City of Edmonds
City of Lynnwood
City of Mountlake Terrace
City of Woodway
Packet Page 359 of 532
Packet Page 360 of 532
Packet Page 361 of 532
Packet Page 362 of 532
Packet Page 363 of 532
Packet Page 364 of 532
Packet Page 365 of 532
Packet Page 366 of 532
Packet Page 367 of 532
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
6
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
6
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
0
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
1
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
2
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
3
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
4
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
5
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
6
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
7
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
7
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
0
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
1
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
2
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
3
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
4
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
5
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
6
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
7
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
8
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
0
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
1
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
2
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
3
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
4
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
5
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
6
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
7
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
3
9
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
0
0
o
f
5
3
2
Packet Page 401 of 532
Packet Page 402 of 532
Packet Page 403 of 532
Packet Page 404 of 532
Packet Page 405 of 532
Packet Page 406 of 532
Packet Page 407 of 532
Packet Page 408 of 532
Packet Page 409 of 532
Packet Page 410 of 532
Packet Page 411 of 532
Packet Page 412 of 532
Packet Page 413 of 532
Packet Page 414 of 532
Packet Page 415 of 532
Packet Page 416 of 532
Packet Page 417 of 532
Packet Page 418 of 532
Packet Page 419 of 532
Packet Page 420 of 532
Packet Page 421 of 532
Packet Page 422 of 532
Packet Page 423 of 532
Packet Page 424 of 532
Packet Page 425 of 532
Packet Page 426 of 532
Packet Page 427 of 532
Packet Page 428 of 532
Packet Page 429 of 532
Packet Page 430 of 532
Packet Page 431 of 532
Packet Page 432 of 532
Packet Page 433 of 532
Packet Page 434 of 532
Packet Page 435 of 532
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
3
6
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
3
7
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
3
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
3
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
0
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
1
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
2
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
3
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
4
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
5
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
6
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
7
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
8
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
4
9
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
5
0
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
5
1
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
5
2
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
5
3
o
f
5
3
2
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
4
5
4
o
f
5
3
2
City of Edmonds
Date: October 11, 2012
To: Michael Clugston, Associate Planner
From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager
Subject:
PLN20070021, Stonebridge Court 10 lot Plat - Final Decision
7723/7807 220th St SW
The Engineering Division has found that the subject 10-lot plat meets the requirements
established for civil subdivision improvements in accordance with Edmonds Community
Development Code (ECDC) 20.75 and is approved and authorized for recording.
Civil construction plans were submitted to the Engineering Division on February 13, 2012 and
approved for construction on June 20, 2012 consistent with ECDC 20.75.120.
Civil construction improvements listed as conditions of approval in attachment 8 of the July
31, 2007 staff report and as shown on the approved civil construction plans have not yet been
constructed in their entirety. Consistent with ECDC 20.75.130, a performance bond has been
posted as surety that these improvements will be completed within 12 months following
recording of the plat. While many of the improvements have been completed, a performance
bond was submitted by the developer and accepted by the City on June 29, 2012 reflecting the
total cost to construct all required improvements in the amount of $689,278.26.
As a condition of development the subject plat will dedicate a public street to the City of
Edmonds designated as 78th Pl W. In addition, a 10-foot wide public stormwater utility
easement, 1-foot wide and 5-foot wide public pedestrian access easements, and access
easements for inspection of drainage facilities across tracts 998 and 999 will be granted to the
City of Edmonds.
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Packet Page 455 of 532
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
Page 1 of 2
October __, 2012
Subject: Notice of Decision for Stonebridge Court Final Plat and Planned Residential Development
(PRD) at 7723 & 7807 220th Street SW – Files PLN20070020 and PLN20070021
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter serves as the notice of final decision regarding the above-referenced project pursuant to
Section 20.06.009.A of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC).
Timeline of project decisions
The original applicant first applied for preliminary plat and PRD approval on March 9, 2007. A SEPA
threshold determination was issued by the City on July 17, 2007; the Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance required that the applicant submit traffic impact fees of $840.72 per lot created. The
Architectural Design Board (ADB) heard the application and recommended approval, with conditions,
on July 18, 2007. The Hearing Examiner issued preliminary plat and PRD approval on September 11,
2007, subject to conditions, but remanded two items for additional clarification. Due to the economic
downturn, however, the project sat idle for several years.
In September 2011, a new applicant assumed the project and submitted for updated preliminary
plat/PRD approval by addressing the remand items while making other minor changes to the project.
The ADB reviewed the updated project on November 2, 2011, and included conditions with its
approval recommendation. On December 22, 2011, the Hearing Examiner approved the remanded
items and changes and issued updated conditions for the preliminary plat and PRD.
The applicant submitted civil subdivision improvement plans on February 13, 2012. The Engineering
Division approved the civil construction plans on June 20, 2012. While many of the improvements on
the site have been installed and inspected, a bond has been submitted to guarantee completion of
other approved civil subdivision improvements and landscaping which have yet to be installed.
The applicant submitted documents for final plat and PRD approval on July 12, 2012. Staff reviewed
those documents and determined that all conditions of preliminary approval had been satisfied. On
October __, 2012, the Edmonds City Council granted final plat and PRD approval for the Stonebridge
Court project. The final documents have been signed and are ready for recording with the Snohomish
County Auditor.
Packet Page 456 of 532
Page 2 of 2
According to ECDC 20.06.009.A, the affected property owners may request a change in property tax
valuation notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Clugston, AICP
Associate Planner
Cc: File No. PLN20070020 & PLN20070021
Parties of Record:
Engineering Division
Planning Division
Loree Quade
Bryan Briscoe
Jim Egge
Joe St. Laurent
Kathy Lester
Colleen McDonald
Alvin Rutledge
Larry Simonson
Vivian Swain
Interested Parties:
Snohomish County Assessor
Packet Page 457 of 532
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE TEN LOT
STONEBRIDGE COURT FINAL PLAT AND PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) (P-2007-21;
PRD-2007-20).
WHEREAS, the hearing examiner approved a ten lot preliminary plat and PRD
for the Stonebridge Court project (P-2007-21; PRD-2007-20) on December 22, 2011,
subject to several conditions; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted documents for final plat and PRD
approval; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed those documents and determined that all
conditions of preliminary approval have been satisfied; and
WHEREAS, a bond has been submitted to guarantee completion of some
approved civil subdivision improvements and landscaping which has yet to be installed;
and
WHEREAS, the city council has reviewed those documents; and
WHEREAS, based on those documents, the city council finds that this
subdivision and PRD conforms to all terms of the hearing examiner’s preliminary plat
and PRD approval, and that said subdivision meets the requirements of chapter 58.17
RCW, other applicable state laws, and all local ordinances adopted under chapter 58.17
RCW that were in effect at the time of preliminary plat and PRD approval; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Final plat and PRD approval of the Stonebridge Court project is
hereby granted, subject to the terms of approval as established by the hearing examiner.
Packet Page 458 of 532
2
Section 2. The mayor is hereby authorized to inscribe and execute this approval
on the face of the plat on behalf of the city council.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to record, at the expense of the
applicant, said final plat and PRD approvals, in accordance with the ordinances of the
City of Edmonds.
RESOLVED THIS _____ DAY OF _________________, 2012:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA CHASE
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO. ___
Packet Page 459 of 532
AM-5186 9.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted By:Rob Chave
Department:Planning
Committee: Type:
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance regarding step backs and design standards.
Recommendation
Approve the draft ordinance (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
Most recently the City Council held further discussion on BD zone step-backs on October 2, 2012, and
voted to adopt the Planning Board's recommendation to remove step-backs from the BD zoning
requirements.
Narrative
As part of its continued deliberation on the Planning Board's recommendations concerning amendments
to the city's BD (Downtown Business) zones, on October 2nd the Council voted to adopt the Planning
Board's recommendation to remove step-backs from the BD zoning requirements. The City Attorney has
drafted an ordinance (Exhibit 1) to implement this action.
While the attached ordinance implements the Council's vote, one modification the Council may wish to
consider relates to ECDC 16.43.030.C.3.b (addressing step-backs in the BD5 zone -- which is the 4th
Avenue Arts Corridor). The Arts Corridor, as stated during the Council discussion, is a unique area with
its own plan. As drafted, the ordinance would allow buildings to 30 feet in BD5 if they have a pitched
roof, or buildings to 30 feet with no reference to step-backs. Given this unique area, it may be desirable to
remove the entire paragraph that references the step-back requirement. This would have the effect of
retaining the pitched roof requirement while the city considers design standards that would address this
unique area. Again, this issue is peculiar to the BD5 zone. In the event Council wishes to make this
modification, the ordinance could simply be amended by the Council to "strike section 16.43.030.C.3.b in
its entirety." This can be done at the time the ordinance is voted on.
Attachments
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Exhibit 2: Draft Council Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 04:35 PM
Packet Page 460 of 532
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:07 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 10/10/2012 02:06 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 461 of 532
1
16.43.030
Site development standards.
A. Table 16.43-2.
Sub
District
Minimum Lot
Area
Minimum
Lot Width
Minimum
Street
Setback
Minimum
Side
Setback1
Minimum
Rear
Setback1
Maximum
Height2
Minimum
Height of
Ground Floor
within the
Designated
Street Front4
BD15 0 0 0 0 0 25' 15'
BD25 0 0 0 0 0 25' 12'
BD35 0 0 0 0 0 25' 12'
BD43,5 0 0 0 0 0 25' 12'
BD55 0 0 0 0 0 25' 12'
1 The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the
surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacent to residentially (R) zoned property.
2 Specific provisions regarding building heights are contained in ECDC 16.43.030(C).
3 Within the BD4 zone, site development standards listed in Table 16.43-2 apply when a building contains a ground floor
consisting of commercial space to a depth of at least 45 feet measured from the street front of the building. If a proposed
building does not meet this ground floor commercial space requirement (e.g., an entirely residential building is proposed), then
the building setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. See ECDC 16.43.030(B)(8) for further details.
4 “Minimum height of ground floor within the designated street-front” means the vertical distance from top to top of the
successive finished floor surfaces for that portion of the ground floor located within the designated street front (see ECDC
16.43.030(B)); and, if the ground floor is the only floor above street grade, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the
ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. “Floor finish” is the exposed floor surface, including
coverings applied over a finished floor, and includes, but is not limited to, wood, vinyl flooring, wall-to-wall carpet, and
concrete, as illustrated in Figure 16.43-1. Figure 16.43-1 shows a ground floor height of 15 feet; note that the “finished” ceiling
height is only approximately 11 feet in this example.
5 Site development standards for single-family dwellings are the same as those specified for the RS-6 zone.
Packet Page 462 of 532
16.43.030
Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones
Packet Page 463 of 532
Edmonds Community Development Code 16.43.030
Figure 16.43-1: Ground Floor Height Measurement
B. Ground Floor. This section describes requirements for development of the ground floor of
buildings in the BD zones.
Packet Page 464 of 532
4
1. For all BD zones, the ground floor is considered to be that floor of a building which is
closest in elevation to the finished grade along the width of the side of the structure that is
principally oriented to the designated street front of the building (this is normally the adjacent
sidewalk). For the purposes of this section, the ground “floor” is considered to be the sum of the
floor planes which, in combination, run the full extent of the building and are closest in elevation
to one another. For the purposes of this chapter, the definition of “ground floor” contained in
ECDC 21.35.017 does not apply.
2. Designated Street Front. Map 16.43-1 shows the streets that define the designated street
front for all properties lying within the BD zones The designated street front is defined as the 45
feet measured perpendicular to the street front of the building lot fronting on each of the mapped
streets.
3. Minimum Height of the Ground Floor within the Designated Street Front. The minimum
height of the ground floor specified in Table 16.43-2 only applies to the height of the ground
floor located within the designated street front established in subsection (B)(2) of this section.
4. Access to Commercial Uses within the Designated Street Front. When a commercial use
is located on the ground floor within a designated street front as defined in subsection (B)(2) of
this section, the elevation of the ground floor and associated entry shall be within seven inches of
the grade level of the adjoining sidewalk. “Grade” shall be as measured at the entry location.
Portions of the ground floor outside the designated street front of the building need not comply
with the access requirements specified in this section.
5. When the designated street front of a building is on a slope which does not allow both
the elevation of the entry and ground floor within the designated street front to be entirely within
seven inches of the grade level of the sidewalk, as specified in subsection (B)(4) of this section,
the portion of the ground floor of the building located within the designated street front may be
designed so that either:
a. The entry is located within seven inches of the grade of the adjacent sidewalk, and the
commercial portion of the ground floor located within the designated street front is within seven
inches of the grade level of the entry; or
b. The building may be broken up into multiple frontages, so that each entry/ground
floor combination is within seven inches of the grade of the sidewalk.
c. For corner lots, a primary entry shall be established for the purposes of determining
where the ground floor entry rules detailed in this section shall apply. The first choice for the
primary entry shall be either 5th Avenue or Main Street. In the case of the BD5 zone, the primary
entry shall always be on 4th Avenue.
Packet Page 465 of 532
16.43.030
6. Within the BD1 zone, development on the ground floor shall consist of only commercial
uses, except that parking may be located on the ground floor so long as it is not located within
the designated street front.
7. Within the BD2 and BD3 zones, development on the ground floor shall consist of only
commercial uses within the designated street front. Any permitted use may be located on the
ground floor outside of the designated street front.
8. Within the BD4 zone, there are two options for developing the ground floor of a
building. One option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space, meeting the same
requirements detailed for the BD2 and BD3 zones in subsection (B)(7) of this section. As a
second option, if more residential space is provided so that the ground floor does not meet the
commercial use requirements described in subsection (B)(7) of this section, then the building
setbacks listed for the RM-1.5 zone shall apply. In the case where RM-1.5 setbacks are required,
the required street setback shall be landscaped and no fence or wall in the setback shall be over
four feet in height above sidewalk grade unless it is at least 50 percent open, such as in a lattice
pattern.
9. Within the BD5 zone, one option is to develop the ground floor with commercial space,
meeting the same requirements detailed for the BD2 zone in subsection (B)(7) of this section.
When development of the ground floor does not conform to these requirements, then
development within the BD5 zone shall meet the following requirements:
a. The building shall be oriented to 4th Avenue. “Orientation to 4th Avenue” shall mean
that:
i. At least one building entry shall face 4th Avenue.
ii. If the building is located adjacent to the public right-of-way, architectural details
and/or applied art shall be incorporated into the building design to add interest at the pedestrian
(i.e., ground floor) level.
iii. If the building is set back from the street, landscaping and/or artwork shall be
located between the building and the street front.
b. Live/work uses are encouraged within the BD5 zone, and potential live/work space is
required for new residential buildings if no other commercial use is provided on-site.
i. If multiple residential uses are located on the ground floor, the building shall
incorporate live/work space into the ground floor design in such a way as to enable building
occupants to use portion(s) of their space for a commercial or art/fabrication use. “Live/work
space” means a structure or portion of a structure that combines a commercial or manufacturing
activity that is allowed in the zone with a residential living space for the owner of the
commercial or manufacturing business, or the owner’s employee, and that person’s household.
The live/work space shall be designed so that a commercial or fabrication or home occupation
use can be established within the space.
Packet Page 466 of 532
6
Figure 16.43-2: BD5 Development
Building at right (foreground) shows landscaping located between building and street.
Building at left (background) shows commercial space integrated with residential uses, and the entry oriented to the
street.
10. Exceptions and Clarifications. The regulations for the ground floor contained in
subsections (B)(1) through (9) of this section apply with the following exceptions or clarifi-
cations:
a. That in all areas the provision of pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is
allowed as a permitted secondary use.
b. The restrictions on the location of residential uses shall not apply when a single-
family use is the only permitted primary use located on the property.
c. Existing buildings may be added onto or remodeled without adjusting the existing
height of the ground floor to meet the specified minimum height, so long as the addition or
remodel does not increase the building footprint or its frontage along a street by more than 25
percent. Permitted uses may occupy an existing space regardless of whether that space meets the
ground floor requirements for height.
d. Parking is not considered to be a commercial use for the purposes of satisfying the
ground floor commercial use requirement within the designated street front (e.g., when the first
45 feet of a building are within a designated street front in the BD1 zone, parking may not be
located within that 45 feet).
e. For properties within the BD2 or BD3 zone which have less than 90 feet of depth
measured from the street front, parking may be located in the rearmost 45 feet of the property,
even if a portion of the parking extends into the first 45 feet of the building. In no case shall the
depth of commercial space as measured from the street front of the building be less than 30 feet.
Packet Page 467 of 532
7
f. Within the BD2, BD3 and BD4 zones, if the first 45 feet of the building as measured
perpendicular to the street consist only of commercial uses and permitted secondary uses, then
permitted multiple-family residential unit(s) may be located behind the commercial uses.
g. Recodified as ECDC 22.43.050(B)(4).
h. Within the BD1 zone, each commercial space located on the ground floor within the
designated street front shall be directly accessible by an entry from the sidewalk.
C. Building Height Regulations.
1. The basic height limit is 25 feet (see definition of “height” detailed in ECDC 21.40.030).
2. Within the BD1, BD2, BD3, or BD4 zones, an additional five feet of building height –
increasing the overall building height to a maximum of 30 feet – may be obtained if the building
meets the ground floor requirements for the zone as enumerated in ECDC 16.43.030(B). Step-
Back Rules. The following rules apply when calculating the maximum building height for any
building in the specified zone(s) (see Figures 16.43-3 and 16.43-4 for illustrated examples).
a. Within the BD2, BD3, or BD4 zones, an additional five feet of building height, not to
exceed 30 feet, may be obtained if the building is designed to meet all of the following
conditions:
i. A building step-back is provided within 15 feet of any street front. Within the 15-
foot step-back, the maximum building height is the lesser of 25 feet above grade at the property
line (normally the back of the sidewalk) or 30 feet above the “average level” as defined in ECDC
21.40.030. For corner lots, a 15-foot step-back is required along both street fronts. If a building
located on a corner lot has insufficient lot width (i.e., less than 40 feet of lot width) to enable it to
provide the required step-back on both street fronts, then the step-back may be waived facing the
secondary street. This waiver may not be granted for building step-backs required from Fifth
Avenue, Dayton Street, or Main Street.
ii. A 15-foot step-back is provided from the property line opposite the street front.
Within the 15-foot step-back, the maximum building height is the lesser of 25 feet above grade
or 30 feet above the “average level” as defined in ECDC 21.40.030. For corner lots for which a
15-foot step-back is required on more than one street front, there is no 15-foot step-back required
from the property line opposite each street front. For the purpose of determining step-back
requirements, alleys are not considered to be streets.
iii. A building setback, in which the entire building is set back from the property line,
may be substituted on a foot-for-foot basis for the required building step-back. For example, a
five-foot building setback can be combined with a 10-foot building step-back to meet the 15-foot
step-back requirement.
b. Within the BD1 zone, building height may be a maximum of 30 feet in order to
provide for a minimum height of 15 feet for the ground floor. The allowable building height is
measured from the “average level” as defined in ECDC 21.40.030.
Packet Page 468 of 532
8
Note: the diagrams on this page are
deleted from the code..
Packet Page 469 of 532
9
3. Within the BD5 zone, the maximum height may be increased to 30 feet if the building
meets one of the following conditions. In addition, if the building is located within 15 feet of the
public right-of-way, architectural details and/or applied art shall be incorporated into the building
design, and the ground floor shall be distinguished from the upper portions of the building
through the use of differences in materials, windows, and/or architectural forms.
a. All portions of the building above 25 feet consist of a pitched roof such that the pitch
of all portions of the roof is at least six-by-12 and the roof includes architectural features, such as
dormers or gables of a steeper pitch, that break up the roof line into distinct segments.
b. If the building does not make use of a pitched roof system as described in subsection
(C)(3)(a) of this section, the building shall meet the same requirements step-backs shall be
required the same as for the BD2 zone, as described detailed in subsection (C)(2) of this section.
4. Height Exceptions. In addition to the height exceptions listed in ECDC 21.40.030, the
following architectural features are allowed to extend above the height limits specified in this
chapter:
a. A single decorative architectural element, such as a turret, tower, or clock tower, may
extend a maximum of five feet above the specified height limit if it is designed as an integral
architectural feature of the roof and/or facade of the building. The decorative architectural
element shall not cover more than five percent of the roof area of the building.
b. Roof or deck railings may extend a maximum of 42 inches above the specified height
limit within any building step-back required under subsection (C)(2) of this section; provided,
that the railing is constructed so that it has the appearance of being transparent. An example
meeting this condition would be a railing that is comprised of glass panels.
D. Off-Street Parking and Access Requirements. The parking regulations included here apply
specifically within the BD zone. Whenever there are conflicts between the requirements of this
chapter and the provisions contained in Chapter 17.50 ECDC, Off-Street Parking Regulations,
the provisions of this chapter shall apply.
1. Within the BD1 zone, no new curb cuts are permitted along 5th Avenue or Main Street.
2. No parking is required for any commercial floor area of permitted uses located within
the BD1, BD2, BD4, and BD5 zones.
3. No parking is required for any floor area in any building with a total building footprint of
less than 4,800 square feet.
E. Open Space Requirements.
1. For buildings on lots larger than 12,000 square feet or having an overall building width
of more than 120 feet (as measured parallel to the street lot line), at least five percent of the lot
area shall be devoted to open space. Open space shall not be required for additions to existing
buildings that do not increase the building footprint by more than 10 percent. Open space shall
be provided adjacent to the street front (street lot line). Such open space may be provided as any
combination of:
a. Outdoor dining or seating areas (including outdoor seating or waiting areas for
restaurants or food service establishments);
b. Public plaza or sidewalk that is accessible to the public;
c. Landscaping which includes a seating area that is accessible to the public.
2. Required open space shall be open to the air and not located under a building story.
Packet Page 470 of 532
10
3. In overall dimension, the width of required open space shall not be less than 75 percent
of the depth of the open space, measured relative to the street (i.e., width is measured parallel to
the street lot line, while depth is measured perpendicular to the street lot line).
F. Historic Buildings. The exceptions contained in this section apply only to buildings listed
on the Edmonds register of historic buildings.
1. If a certificate of appropriateness is issued by the Edmonds historic preservation
commission under the provisions of Chapter 20.45 ECDC for the proposed project, the staff may
modify or waive any of the requirements listed below that would otherwise apply to the
expansion, remodeling, or restoration of the building. The decision of staff shall be processed as
a Type II development project permit application (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
a. Building step-backs required under subsection (C)(2) of this section.
b. Open space required under subsection (E) of this section.
2. No off-street parking is required for any permitted uses located within a building listed
on the Edmonds register of historic buildings. Note that additional parking exceptions involving
building expansion, remodeling or restoration may also apply, as detailed in ECDC
17.50.070(C).
Packet Page 471 of 532
11
3. Within the BD5 zone, if a building listed on the Edmonds register of historic buildings is
retained on-site, no off-street parking is required for any additional buildings or uses located on
the same property. To obtain this benefit, an easement in a form acceptable to the city shall be
recorded with Snohomish County protecting the exterior of the historic building and ensuring
that the historic building is maintained in its historic form and appearance so long as the
additional building(s) obtaining the parking benefit exist on the property. The easement shall
continue even if the property is subsequently subdivided or any interest in the property is sold.
G. Density. There is no maximum density for permitted multiple dwelling units.
H. Screening. The required setback from R-zoned property shall be landscaped with trees and
ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BD lot. A six-foot minimum
height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback, except for that
portion of the BD zone that is in residential use.
I. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 17.50, 20.10, and 20.60 ECDC. Sign
standards shall be the same as those that apply within the BC zone.
J. Satellite Television Antennas. In accordance with the limitations established by the Federal
Communications Commission, satellite television antennas greater than two meters in diameter
shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of ECDC 16.20.050. [Ord. 3736 § 10, 2009;
Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
Packet Page 472 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 18
Councilmember Bloom noted the problem of the railroad tracks blocking the beach and emergency access
has existed for many years. She was concerned including this large project on the CFP commits the City
to addressing the emergency access issue via an underpass. She suggested an alternate project that would
address emergency access separate from ferry loading. Mr. Williams answered the CFP is a 20-year plan
and it is not unreasonable to take a visionary approach. Including the project in the CFP does not commit
the City to anything; the City is not seeking design and construction funds for an undercrossing but rather
funds for a conceptual analysis of viable alternatives. If the solution also addresses ferry loading, the City
is much more likely to acquire funding with WSDOT Ferries Division as a partner.
Councilmember Bloom questioned how the emergency access problem will be addressed in the short
term, envisioning there was a less expensive alternative to addressing emergency access. Mr. Williams
answered knowing that train traffic will increase, the problem will worsen in the future. He suggested it is
possible to continue to live with the problem now while trying to identify a visionary solution without
doing an interim solution.
Mayor Earling advised the next step is a public hearing at the Planning Board.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON,
TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 45 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED (4-2),
COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
13. CONTINUED DISCUSSION REGARDING STEP-BACKS.
Interim Development Services Director Rob Chave commented when discussing step-backs, the real issue
is design. He pointed out there have been distinct periods in the history of downtown buildings:
• Prior to 1956 adoption of zoning code
• 1956 to 1981
• 1981 to 1997
• 1997 to 2005
• 2005 to Now
Height limits have also changed over time:
• First zoning code in 1956: 45 feet
• 1964: 35 feet
• 1981: 30 feet
o Pitched roof / modulated design / step-backs
• Codes since 1981 have addressed what happens in the 5 feet above 25 feet, but the 30-foot height
limit has remained unchanged
• 2005 - step-back required to increase building height from 25 to 30 feet
Mr. Chave displayed photographs of buildings constructed prior to 1956: historic forms that still exist,
some are on the Historic Register, buildings that are important factors in the feel and design of downtown.
He displayed photographs of buildings constructed 1956 to 1981 that he termed as the “simple box,”
unadorned with little architectural character. The solution when the height limit was lowered to 30 feet in
1981 was a pitched roof but still no design guidance. He displayed photographs of building constructed
1981 to 1997, commenting the buildings tended to be a box with a “hat” on top. Beginning in 1997 there
was a requirement for modulated buildings. He displayed photographs of buildings constructed 1997-
2005, explaining the result was different roof forms and some attempt to differentiate vertical forms with
a lot of repetitive elements.
He summarized:
• Buildings prior to 1956
o Pedestrian scale & orientation
o A richness of materials & architectural detail
Packet Page 473 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 19
o Vertical detailing
• 1956 to 1981
o Larger scale, very simple buildings
o Lacking in architectural detail
• 1981 to 1997
o Some improvement in architectural detail
o Pitched roofs as an add-on or afterthought
• 1997 to 2005
o More architectural elements included
o More attention to vertical elements
o “Busy” horizontal elements
Mr. Chave summarized the code today requires:
• Retail core / BD1:
o No step-backs
o Mandatory design standards
• Other BD zones
o Mandatory 15-foot step-backs
o Design objectives (not design standards)
Mr. Chave commented it was difficult to find examples of 15-foot step-backs. He provided photographic
examples of 15-foot step-backs in downtown Kirkland and Old Town Bellevue, noting they were on
much taller buildings. He displayed photographs of Chanterelle’s and the Edmonds Theater, commenting
step-backs do not complement traditional commercial building styles. Using Chanterelle’s as an example,
he pointed out step-backs would not allow traditional buildings to be built. He displayed photographs of
buildings that echo traditional building styles and new construction that often tries to duplicate traditional
building styles such as Mill Creek Town Center.
Mr. Chave relayed the Planning Board recommendation to eliminate the step-back requirement in the
downtown (BD) zones. Staff supports this recommendation and believes stronger design standards are
needed that will produce good building design, such as currently exist in the BD1 zone.
If a maximum building height of 30 feet is allowed, Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether an
overhang could be required on the first level. Mr. Chave responded the BD1 zone design standards
address an overhang. There is design guidance for the other zones.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the zoning map and asked how the location of BD2, 3, 4 and 5
zones was determined. Mr. Chave answered BD1 is the retail core, BD3 is an auto-oriented area, BD4
already has a fair amount of multi-family therefore mixed use and multi-family are allowed, and BD5
recognized the planning done for the 4th Avenue Corridor. Everything else was zoned BD2. Most of
downtown is zoned BD1 and BD2.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Mr. Clifton and Mr. Chave for meeting with her and providing
her the history. She expressed interest in similar design criteria throughout downtown in all the BD zones,
noting other tourist towns she has visited have the same design throughout. She agreed the intent was not
to change the height, only remove the step-back requirement. Mr. Chave commented there has been a
great deal of focus on height over the years but little focus on design.
Motion #1
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO ACCEPT THE PLANNING BOARD’S RECOMMENDATION TO REMOVE THE STEP-
BACK REQUIREMENT OF 15 FEET FROM THE CODE.
Packet Page 474 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 20
For Councilmember Petso, Mr. Chave explained the Planning Board was essentially saying a 30-foot
building could be constructed without a step-back. Councilmember Petso recalled the step-back provision
allowed an increase in height from 25 feet to 30 feet. She observed the motion would allow a 30 foot
building rather than requiring a step-back to obtain a height of 30 feet. Mr. Chave answered yes, although
there is still the requirement for a 12-foot ground floor.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with removing the requirement for a step-back but wanted to
have design standards as part of the package, otherwise there would be no step-back and 30 foot boxes.
Mr. Chave stated there is general guidance in the Comprehensive Plan but no specific standards.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recommended removing the step-back requirement at the same time
design guidelines are adopted. Mr. Chave advised that would require referring it back to the Planning
Board.
Councilmember Bloom did not support the motion as she agreed design standards were needed in
conjunction with removing the requirement for a step-back.
Council President Peterson noted step-backs are a major component of design; in this case a horrible
component. He asked if requiring BD1 design standards throughout downtown would require Planning
Board review. Mr. Chave answered it would. Council President Peterson expressed support for the motion
and then directing the Planning Board to implement design standards throughout the downtown.
Councilmember Johnson asked when the Planning Board made this recommendation. Mr. Chave
answered over a year ago. Councilmember Johnson explained a key consideration by the Planning Board
at that time was that a 15-foot step-back after 25 feet on a building on a flat lot with a flat roof would not
produce any usable space. Mr. Chave added there are a large number of narrow lots downtown and a 15-
foot step-back would result in the loss of a lot of practical building space without achieving any benefit in
design. Councilmember Johnson explained that was especially true on a lot with two street frontages. She
recommended making a decision on step-backs separate from any additional work the Planning Board
does with regard to design standards as that decision is long overdue.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not object to removing the requirement for a step-back; the question
was whether to remove the step-back and risk the construction of box buildings until design standards are
developed. Mr. Chave suggested as an intermediary the Council could reduce the step-back to a more
reasonable amount such as 5 feet while the Planning Board considers specific design standards. He
anticipated it would take the Planning Board until early 2013 to consider design standards.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Council could implement BD1 design standards in addition to
removing the 15-foot step-back. Mr. Chave answered that was beyond the scope of what the Planning
Board considered.
Councilmember Petso suggested removing the step-back requirement with a maximum building height of
25 feet rather than 30 feet. She noted the agenda memo stated the Council would provide direction to staff
to prepare an ordinance. When the Council last discussed this, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas requested
it be discussed after development agreements and Councilmember Johnson asked that it be discussed after
incentive zoning, neither of which have been discussed by the Council. She asked whether reducing the
step-back to 5 feet rather than 15 feet was within the scope of what the Planning Board considered. Mr.
Chave answered yes; the Planning Board discussed reduced step-backs.
Amendment #1
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
AMEND THE MOTION TO REDUCE THE STEP-BACKS TO 5 FEET WHILE DESIGN
STANDARDS ARE REVIEWED.
Packet Page 475 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 21
Councilmember Bloom commented it has been suggested by some that the Council is losing the City
money because there are developers who would like to develop properties if not for the step-back
requirement. She asked if there were properties that would develop with a 5-foot step-back at 25 feet
versus a 15-foot step-back. Mr. Clifton was unsure with a 5-foot step-back but there were if the 15-foot
step-back were removed. He agreed there is a perception among developers that the Council is stalling.
Councilmember Bloom asked what kind of buildings could be constructed if the Council reduced the
step-back to 5 feet or eliminated the 15-foot step-back without design standards. Mr. Clifton agreed it
would be preferable to have BD1 design standards also apply to the BD2 – 5 zones. He also supported the
Planning Board’s recommendation to remove the 15-foot step-back requirement. Mr. Chave commented
the design review chapter states developers must abide by the Comprehensive Plan guidance in the
Downtown Waterfront Plan which includes design guidance. They are not as specific as design standards
that apply to BD1. At the time, the Council did not want specific design standards to apply to BD2 – 5
zones and were comfortable with the design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff’s intent would
be to apply the design guidance to the BD2 – 5 zones.
If the Council eliminated or reduced the step-back, Councilmember Bloom questioned how many
developers would proceed with projects before design standards could be adopted. Mr. Clifton answered
it was impossible to know how many developers would utilize the elimination of the 15-foot step-back in
their design. There is potential for one property owner to possibly move forward with a development
although no final plans have been submitted.
Council President Peterson said he will not support the amendment as a 5-foot step-back did not appear to
be a positive design element although it was better than a 15-foot step-back. He did not fear a 1979 design
because there are design guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Johnson recalled there was a 25-foot height limit in the BD zones and an additional 5 feet
if the ground floor facing the street frontage had a 15-foot ceiling height. Mr. Chave answered that was
required in BD1. There is a 12-foot ground floor requirement in BD2; that would still exist with or
without the step-back requirement.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas would not object to eliminating the 15-foot step-back if the motion was
clear that the Planning Board would immediately begin work on design standards for BD2 – 5. She was
not comfortable with a 5-foot step-back and waiting until the Planning Board could get to the design
standards. Mr. Chave responded if the Council indicates it is a priority, staff will inform the Planning
Board and schedule it on their agenda. He anticipated the Planning Board could begin well before year
end. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas preferred that direction be in the form of a motion.
Councilmember Johnson commented problems still exist with a 5-foot step-back.
If the amendment failed, Council President Peterson offered to make an amendment to make the
development of design standards a priority.
Vote on Amendment #1
UPON ROLL CALL, THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT FAILED (2-4), COUNCILMEMBERS
BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
Amendment #2
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE LANGUAGE THAT DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR THE BD2, 3 AND 4 BE PUT ON THE PLANNING BOARD’S SCHEDULE AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE AS A PRIORITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Packet Page 476 of 532
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 2, 2012
Page 22
Council President Peterson explained he did not include BD5 as that is the Arts Corridor where there are
primarily single family homes and it is a separate issue.
Councilmember Petso asked why design standards for BD5 were not a priority. Mr. Chave agreed design
standards for BD5 are on a separate track. The 4th Avenue Corridor Plan includes language regarding
historic preservation. Councilmember Petso asked if a 30-foot mixed use box could be constructed in the
BD5 if the step-back is eliminated. Mr. Chave commented the BD5 zone has some unique characteristics.
Councilmember Bloom did not support the motion because she preferred to have design standards in
place before making this change. There are many buildings that people are not happy with because 3
stories rather than 2 can be achieved on a slope and 3 stories are more likely to be achieved with a 25 plus
5 foot height limit with some modulation. She was concerned with massing and design and the possibility
that someone could slip in and construct a 30-foot box without appropriate design standards.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what would prevent someone from building a box before design
standards were adopted. Mr. Chave stated there are design guidelines in the form of design objectives in
the Downtown Waterfront section of the Comprehensive Plan that apply throughout downtown. They are
not as specific as the BD1 design standards. Under the design objectives, he was certain there would not
be buildings like those constructed 1956-1981 or 1981-1997; he could not rule out a building that was
similar to buildings constructed 1997 and later. The design guidelines adopted in 2004-2005 address
vertical detail; any building construction now would look much different than those constructed in the late
1990s.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, MOVED TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 15 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Petso referred to Anderson v. Issaquah and the ability to enforce design guidelines. City
Attorney Jeff Taraday answered he had not had an opportunity to study the City’s current design
guidelines and the extent to which they are enforceable under Anderson v. Issaquah. From what Mr.
Chave said, the guidelines are not as enforceable as staff would like and to some extent the City may be
relying on a cooperative developer to provide what the City wants.
Councilmember Petso asked whether it made a difference whether the design guidelines were in the code
versus the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Taraday answered yes. Councilmember Petso asked whether their
being in the Comprehensive Plan made them less enforceable. Mr. Chave answered the code points to the
objectives in the Comprehensive Plan as criteria for approval.
Vote on Amendment #2
THE VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING
NO.
Mayor Earling clarified the main motion was to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance.
Vote on Motion #1 as amended:
THE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION CARRIED (4-2) COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO AND
BLOOM VOTING NO.
14. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling had no report.
15. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Johnson thanked Planning Board Vice Chair Val Stewart for her presentation and for
staying during the Council’s discussion regarding step-backs. Councilmember Johnson encouraged the
Packet Page 477 of 532
AM-5191 10.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:5 Minutes
Submitted For:Shawn Hunstock Submitted By:Carl Nelson
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Recommend
Review by
Full Council
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Indefeasible Right of Use Agreement for Existing Fiber Connection.
Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign IRU agreement.
Previous Council Action
On Sept 21st 2010 City Council authorized entering into an Interlocal Agreement with SERS for Low
Cost Dark Fiber (Agenda Memo 3380) for the City's Black Rock fiber connection to the County Data
Center. This is a follow-on agreement targeted at saving an estimated $116,250 over the life of the
agreement for that fiber connection.
Narrative
To save about $131,000 over 30 years, purchase an indefeasible right of use (IRU) from Black Rock
communications for $57,750.
City is currently using 2 strands of fiber from Black Rock Communications between our Public Works
Facility and the County "Meet me Cabinet" in Everett. These 2 strands of fiber are part of a 3 year
agreement with Black Rock, the County, and 6 Cities, where the Cities pay nothing during the initial 3yr
period. After the 3yr period each City will pay $500/mo for a single strand. As an option during the 3yr
period of free use the Cities, as a group, had the option to buy a 30yr irrevokeable right of use (IRU) on a
sliding scale, based on when in the 3 year period the Cites buy the IRU (1st yr - $304,500, 2nd
yr-$325,500, 3rd yr - $346,500).
The opportunity to buy in the first and second year have passed. The Cities of Lynnwood, Mukilteo, and
Mill Creek, have negotiated a 30yr IRU for their use of the Black Rock fiber. This agreement has been
negotiated for the third year of $57,750. Given the announcement of the impending sale of Black Rock
to Wave Division Holdings, it is likely the cost of such an arrangement will go up after the sale.
Assuming we did nothing and paid month to month, at the current rates, the cost for the 27yr balance of
fiber usage would be: $174,000, therefore by agreeing to this 30yr IRU there would be an
estimated savings of $116,250 over the remaining 27 years.
Packet Page 478 of 532
Attachments
IRU Agreement with Black Rock Cable
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Shawn Hunstock 10/11/2012 11:31 AM
Community Services/Economic Dev.Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 10:32 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 10:33 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 11:11 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 11:22 AM
Form Started By: Carl Nelson Started On: 10/11/2012 10:03 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 479 of 532
1 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
IRU AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
BLACK ROCK CABLE, INC
AND
CITY OF EDMONDS
DATED
November 15th, 2012
Packet Page 480 of 532
2 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT OF USE AGREEMENT
THIS INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT OF USE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and
entered into as of November 15, 2012, by and between Black Rock Cable, a Nevada corporation
DBA Black Rock Cable, Inc. (“Black Rock”), and City of Edmonds (“Customer”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Black Rock is planning to construct or has constructed a Cable Bundle(s)
containing multiple single mode fiber optic lines between certain points identified in Exhibit A
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, Customer desires to use certain optical fibers in the Cable Bundle, and
Black Rock desires to grant Customer an Indefeasible Right to Use certain fibers in the Cable
Bundle, all upon the terms and conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS
Unless expressly defined herein, words having well known technical or trade meanings
shall be so construed. Unless expressly otherwise defined herein, the following capitalized terms
when used in this Agreement will have the following meaning:
“Actual Delivery Date” shall mean the day following the fourteen (14) day Customer Test Period
and the beginning of the Term of this IRU and payments required hereunder.
“Binding Delivery Date” shall mean the latest day that the parties agree that Black Rock must
provide Customer Fibers for Customer activation and testing.
“Cable Bundle” when used herein as a defined term means the fiber optic cable and the fiber
contained therein, and associated splicing connections, splice boxes, and other appurtenances
that may be installed as part of the Cable Bundle.
“Continuity” shall mean the ability of the Customer Fibers to pass signals within the loss budget
limitations for any specific Customer Fiber connection.
“Customer Fibers” shall mean the specific Dark Fibers in the Cable Bundle that are the subject of
an IRU granted hereunder, as identified in the attached Exhibit A.
“Customer Test Period” shall mean the fourteen (14) day period beginning at the day that notice
is given by Black Rock to the Customer that the Customer Fibers are ready for Customer
activation and testing.
“Dark Fibers” shall mean fiber optic strands provided without electronics or optronics, and
which are not “lit” or activated.
Packet Page 481 of 532
3 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
“Execution Date” shall mean the date which the Customer signs and executes this Agreement.
“Impositions” shall mean all taxes, fees, levies, imposts, duties, charges or withholdings of any
nature (including, without limitation, sales, use, transfer, personal property and real property
taxes, gross receipts taxes, gross income taxes, net receipts or net income taxes received by or
accrued to such party, franchise, access, license and permit fees), together with any penalties,
fines or interest thereon (except for penalties or interest imposed as a direct result of acts or
failures to act on the part of a party) arising out of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and/or imposed upon the Cable Bundle by any federal, state or local government or
other local public taxing authority with the lawful capacity to charge, levy or impost.
“Indefeasible Right of Use” or “IRU” shall mean an exclusive indefeasible right of use for the
purposes described herein, in the Customer Fibers, as granted in this Agreement, provided that
the IRU’s granted hereunder do not provide Customer with any ownership interest in or other
rights to physical access to, or control of, modifications of, encumbrance in any manner, or the
use of the Cable Bundle except as expressly set forth herein.
“Interest Holders” shall mean any and all owners (including Black Rock and Customer) in the
Cable Bundle and any and all holders of an IRU or equivalent interests (including long-term
lessees) in the Cable Bundle.
“IRU Fee” shall mean the fee negotiated and stated on the Exhibit A for which an IRU has been
granted to Customer as set forth in this Agreement, hereafter, and shall not include applicable
charges for Maintenance Fees, Impositions incurred or accrued by reason of the IRU.
“Maintenance Fees” shall mean the fees to be paid by the Customer to Black Rock for the
maintenance and repair of the Cable Bundle, as set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
“Maintenance Window” shall mean a prearranged period of time reserved for performing certain
work on the Cable Bundle.
“Reasonable Efforts” shall mean efforts commercially and reasonably designed to achieve the
desired results.
“Service Affecting Condition” shall mean a condition on the Cable Bundle that materially
adversely affects Customer’s ability to utilize the Customer Fibers.
“Underlying Rights” shall mean all deeds, leases, easements, rights of way, licenses, franchises,
permits and other rights, titles or interests as are necessary for the construction, installation,
operation, maintenance or repair of the Cable Bundle.
“Underlying Rights Requirements” shall mean the terms, conditions, requirements, restrictions,
and/or limitations upon Customer’s right to use the Customer Fibers as provided and permitted
under this Agreement, and associated safety, operational and other rules and regulations imposed
in connection with the Underlying Rights.
All sums of money expressed in this Agreement are expressed in lawful currency of the United
States of America.
Packet Page 482 of 532
4 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
2. GRANT OF RIGHTS IN THE CERTAIN CABLE BUNDLE
A. Black Rock hereby grants to Customer, and Customer hereby purchases from
Black Rock, an exclusive Indefeasible Right of Use in the Customer Fibers
located within the Cable Bundle, all as more specifically described in the Exhibit
A attached hereto. Black Rock shall retain legal title to the entire Cable Bundle
and the Customer Fibers, subject only to the IRU granted hereunder.
B. Black Rock will provide Customer Fibers to the Customer with no bandwidth
restrictions. The Customer may use the Customer Fiber for any legal and
authorized purpose, pursuant to this Agreement. The Customer Fibers will be
built as a discreet and dedicated connection for the Customer and no other party.
3. PERMITS; UNDERLYING RIGHTS
A. Black Rock shall obtain on or before the Binding Delivery Date, any and all
Underlying Rights relating to the grant of rights and interests in and/or access to
the real property underlying the Cable Bundle, and such other rights, licenses,
permits, authorizations, consents and approvals (including, without limitation, any
necessary local, state, federal or tribal authorizations and environmental permits)
that are necessary in order to (i) grant the IRU’s, and otherwise perform its
obligations hereunder, and (ii) permit Customer to use, operate and access the
Customer Fibers all in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof, and the
Underlying Rights Requirements.
B. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, it is expressly
understood that Customer shall be solely responsible for compliance with all legal
and regulatory requirements associated with its business or operation of Customer
Fibers or use of the IRU including maintaining all required franchises, permits,
authorizations, licenses, approvals or other consents (other than the Underlying
Rights), and Black Rock shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever in
connection therewith.
C. Black Rock shall use its Reasonable Efforts to either require that the stated term
of any Underlying Right applicable to the Cable Bundle shall be for a period that
does not expire in accordance with its ordinary terms prior to the last day of the
Initial Term of the IRU, or if the stated term of any such Underlying Rights
expires, in accordance with its ordinary terms, on a date earlier than the last day
of the Initial Term of the IRU, Black Rock shall, at its cost, exercise any renewal
rights thereunder, or otherwise use its Reasonable Efforts to acquire such
extensions, additions and/or replacements as may be necessary in order to cause
the stated term thereof to be continued until a date that is not earlier than the last
day of the Initial Term of the IRU; provided, however, that Black Rock shall not
be required to expend, as consideration for any such renewals or extensions, more
than the fair market rate payable at such time for similar rights and terms, unless
Customer agrees, at its option, to pay directly any amounts required to be paid in
excess of such fair market rate to renew or extend such Underlying Rights. If
Packet Page 483 of 532
5 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
after use of Reasonable Efforts, Black Rock does not obtain such extensions,
additions and/or replacements, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Customer
from seeking to obtain or obtaining any renewal or extension of any such
Underlying Rights from the grantor of such Underlying Rights, but at the
Customers sole cost and expense.
D. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, upon the
expiration or termination of any Underlying Right that is necessary in order to
grant, continue or maintain an IRU granted hereunder in accordance with the
terms and conditions hereof, and so long as Black Rock shall have fully observed
and performed its obligations in accordance with this Agreement with respect
thereto, the term, either the Initial Term or any Renewal Term granted hereunder,
of the IRU granted with respect to the Customer Fibers or any portion of the
Cable Bundle affected thereby shall automatically expire upon such expiration or
termination of the Underlying Rights.
E. Black Rock shall use its Reasonable Efforts to cause the terms of each such
Underlying Rights to provide Customer with a guarantee of non-disturbance
during the term of such Underlying Rights and any renewal thereof, and shall
further endeavor to include the right of Customer to obtain notice of any default
on the part of Black Rock and to permit Customer to cure, on behalf of Black
Rock, any such default by Black Rock and, thereafter, to continue the use of such
Underlying Rights in accordance with Black Rock’s rights and interests
thereunder; provided that Black Rock’s failure to obtain such notice and a right to
cure shall not be considered a breach of this Agreement by Black Rock. If
Customer at any time cures such default by Black Rock, Black Rock shall
reimburse Customer for any and all amounts reasonably paid by Customer
promptly upon demand.
F. Black Rock further covenants and agrees with respect to such Underlying Rights
to observe and perform its duties, obligations and responsibilities under such
Underlying Rights or under this Agreement, if the failure to observe and perform
any such obligation or obligations would permit the grantor of such Underlying
Rights to terminate such Underlying Rights prior to its stated expiration date, or
would otherwise materially adversely impair or affect Customer’s ability to use
the Customer Fibers, or exercise Customer’s rights with respect to the IRU, as
provided and permitted hereunder.
G. Throughout the term of each such Underlying Rights, Black Rock shall at its
reasonable cost and expense defend and protect Black Rock’s rights in and
interests under the Underlying Rights and Customer’s right to use the Customer
Fibers as provided and permitted hereunder against interfering or infringing
rights, interests or claims of third parties.
Packet Page 484 of 532
6 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
4. SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE WINDOWS
A. Black Rock shall have the right to perform regularly scheduled maintenance on
the Cable Bundle on at least a monthly basis or more often as may be agreed
between the parties. Regularly scheduled maintenance may require temporarily
disconnecting of the Customer Fibers for various reasons. Black Rock will
coordinate with the Customer to mutually agree to Maintenance Windows that
will have the least impact on the Customer Fibers.
5. IRU FEE; MAINTENANCE FEE; INVOICING
A. Black Rock will invoice Customer for the one-time IRU fee and annually for
Maintenance Fees as described herein in Exhibit A. All invoices shall be
delivered to the Customer in a customary fashion and shall be due and payable
thirty (30) days after receipt of an undisputed invoice.
6. CONSTRUCTION OF THE CABLE BUNDLE
A. Black Rock shall, at Black Rock’s sole cost and expense, design, engineer,
procure all fiber and material, install, and construct the Cable Bundle. Black
Rock shall choose the route of the Cable Bundle and such route may not be the
most direct route between the locations desired by the Customer.
B. Black Rock shall provide the Customer Fiber to the Customer for activation and
testing no later than the sixty (60) days after the Execution Date (“Binding
Delivery Date”). If Black Rock cannot provide the Fiber to the Customer within
the time frame in the preceding sentence, the Customer will have the option to
void this Agreement and all terms conditions and payments required herein,
provided, however, that the reason for Black Rock’s inability to perform was
under Black Rock’s control or responsibility pursuant to this Agreement.
C. Upon provision of the Customer Fibers to the Customer, the Customer payment
obligations shall commence at the conclusion of the Customer Test Period.
7. TESTING AND DELIVERY OF THE CUSTOMER FIBERS
A. Black Rock shall test all Customer Fibers for Continuity and estimated loss
between the Connection Points or point of demarcation in accordance with
standard industry practices. Prior to the Execution Date, Black Rock shall present
Customer with the maximum loss budget and such loss budget shall be included
in Exhibit B.
B. After construction and testing have been completed, Black Rock will notify the
Customer in writing that the Customer Fibers are ready for Customer use. The
Customer shall have fourteen (14) calendar days (“Customer Test Period”) to
install, activate and test Customer owned equipment and verify that the Customer
Fibers are providing connectivity between the Customer owned equipment. If
Packet Page 485 of 532
7 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
requested by the Customer, Black Rock may assist the Customer during the
activation process.
C. The calendar day of the expiration of the Customer Test Period shall be known as
the Actual Delivery Date, which shall begin the Term of this Agreement and the
IRU and all fees required herein.
8. TERM, TERMINATION, TITLE TRANSFER AND RENEWAL
A. The grant of the IRU for the Customer Fibers shall commence on the Actual
Delivery Date and shall expire on the thirtieth (30th) anniversary date of the
Actual Delivery Date.
(i) At the expiration or other termination of this Agreement, the IRU shall
immediately terminate and all rights of Customer to use the Cable Bundle
or Customer Fibers shall cease and Black Rock shall owe the Customer no
additional duties or consideration with respect to the Cable Bundle or
Customer Fibers provided, however, that the Term has not been renewed.
(ii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, no termination or expiration of this
Agreement shall affect the rights or obligations of any party hereto with
respect to any prior breach or any then existing defaults or the obligation
to make any payment hereunder for services rendered prior to the date of
termination or expiration or with regard to any provisions of this
Agreement that shall survive the expiration or termination hereof.
9. ACCESS TO CUSTOMER FIBERS
A. Black Rock will provide Customer with access to the Customer Fiber as specified
in the attached Exhibit A in order for Customer, at Customer’s sole cost and
expense, to connect its electronic equipment and interconnecting fibers to the
Customer Fibers (“Connecting Point”). Black Rock shall provide a fiber
distribution panel at each Connecting Point, which shall be the point of
demarcation between the Cable Bundle and the Customer Fibers.
B. Customer may determine and utilize any type of electronics or technologies in
association with the Customer Fibers, and Customer may install and operate its
interconnecting fibers, and upgrade, rearrange, maintain, repair, replace or
otherwise deal with Customer’s electronics and interconnecting fibers at its sole
discretion, subject to mutually agreeable safety procedures; provided, however,
that none of Customer’s electronics or technologies shall create any risk of
damage to, or otherwise interfere with the quiet use and enjoyment of the Cable
Bundle by Black Rock or any other Interest Holders.
Packet Page 486 of 532
8 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF THE CABLE BUNDLE
A. The maintenance of the Cable Bundle shall be provided either by Black Rock or
by an independent contractor to be selected by Black Rock. Customer shall pay
Black Rock an annual Maintenance Fee for routine scheduled maintenance,
including patrol of the route, a “Call-Before-You-Dig” program and maintenance
technicians along the route.
B. In the event that all or any part of the Cable Bundle is damaged or destroyed such
that a Service Affecting Condition exists on the Customer Fibers, Black Rock
shall promptly resolve such Service Affecting Condition. Notwithstanding
anything contained herein to the contrary, except where a Service Affecting
Condition was caused primarily by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of
Black Rock, its employees or agents, Black Rock shall not incur any liability to
Customer by reason of a Service Affecting Condition except its obligation to
resolve such Service Affecting Condition as set forth in this Agreement, and
Customer shall not be entitled to any credits for IRU Fees or any other payment
paid or to be paid by the Customer pursuant to this Agreement by reason of such
Service Affecting Condition.
C. Black Rock must maintain Continuity of the Customer Fibers at all times. If the
Customer suspects that Customer Fiber Continuity is lost between locations, the
Customer shall notify Black Rock immediately. Once Black Rock has been
notified, Black Rock will inspect the Customer Fiber and report back to the
Customer within four (4) hours after gaining access to each terminated end of the
Fiber. Black Rock must reestablish Continuity of the Customer Fiber as soon as
possible or notify the Customer that problems encountered are not due to lack of
Fiber Continuity. Subject to the Force Majure provisions of this Agreement, if
Black Rock cannot provide Continuity within forty-eight (48) hours after
notification by the Customer, the Customer will have the option to terminate this
Agreement.
11. OPERATIONS
A. Customer acknowledges and agrees that Black Rock is not supplying nor is Black
Rock obligated to supply Customer with any optronics or electronics or optical or
electrical equipment for the operation of the Customer Fibers, including without
limitation, generators, batteries, air conditioners, fire protection and monitoring
and testing equipment, all of which are the sole responsibility of Customer.
B. Customer represents and warrants that it shall not use the Customer Fibers in any
manner that is not in compliance with (i) any and all applicable government
codes, ordinances, laws, rules, regulations and/or restrictions, and (ii) the
Underlying Rights Requirements, as such may be amended from time to time.
Customer shall not use any product or service that fails to comply with any
applicable safety rules or that would cause any portion of the Cable Bundle to
violate any state or federal environmental laws.
Packet Page 487 of 532
9 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
C. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, Customer expressly agrees that it will
not offer the IRU nor the Customer Fibers in connection with the IRU granted
hereunder for use by any third party as a Dark Fiber, but will only offer services
on the Customer Fibers on which Customer has installed and is operating
electronics and other facilities. All Customer uses of this fiber must be consistent
with the Snohomish County Emergency Radio Systems / Black Rock IRU dated
May 8, 2009 and the Dark Fiber Optic Lease Facilitation Agreement dated April
22, 2010. Customer expressly acknowledges that any breach of the covenant
contained in this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement, entitling
Black Rock to exercise any rights and remedies otherwise provided by reason of
Customer’s material default.
D. Black Rock acknowledges and agrees that it has no right to use the Customer
Fibers during the Initial Term or any applicable Renewal Term of this Agreement,
and after the Actual Delivery Date of the grant of the IRU hereunder, Black Rock
shall keep the Customer Fibers, and the IRU granted free from (i) any liens of any
third party attributable to Black Rock, and (ii) any rights or claims of any third
party attributable to Black Rock. To the extent that Black Rock has granted or
shall grant any lien, encumbrance or security interest in or on all or any portion of
the Cable Bundle, Black Rock shall, to the extent reasonably possible prior to
such grant, provide to Customer a written non-disturbance agreement from such
lienholder substantially to the effect that such lienholder acknowledges Customers
rights and interests in and to the Customer Fibers, and the IRU hereunder, and that
such lienholder expressly agrees that the same shall not be diminished, disturbed,
impaired or interfered with by such lienholder in the exercise of any rights it may
have with regard to Black Rock’s interest in the affected portion of the Cable
Bundle. Black Rock shall not use any other fibers in the Cable Bundle in a way
which physically interferes with or has a material adverse affect on the use of the
Customer Fibers, and Black Rock shall on Customer’s request, obtain from any
Interest Holders a similar agreement to protect Customer’s use of the Customer
Fibers from interference or impairment by reason of such Interest Holder’s use of
other fibers in the Cable Bundle.
E. Customer acknowledges and agrees that it has no right to use any of the fibers,
other than the Customer Fibers incorporated in the Cable Bundle. Customer
expressly acknowledges that the Cable Bundle includes or will include other
Interest Holders, including Black Rock, of Dark Fiber IRU’s and other system
users. Customer shall not use the Customer Fibers or related equipment in a way
which physically interferes in any way with or adversely affects the use and quiet
enjoyment of any portion of the Cable Bundle, any other fibers in the Cable
Bundle, any Cable within the Cable Bundle, or otherwise of any other Interest
Holder using the Cable Bundle. Customer shall keep any and all of the Cable
Bundle, other than the IRU in the Customer Fibers granted to Customer
hereunder, free from any liens, rights or claims of any third party attributable to
Customer.
Packet Page 488 of 532
10 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
12. INDEMNIFICATION
A. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, Black Rock hereby releases and
agrees to indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless Customer, its directors,
officers, agents, and employees, and its respective successors or permitted assigns
from and against: (i) any and all causes of action, demands, claims, suits, losses,
judgments or costs (collectively “Damages”) which may be brought by or asserted
by any third party against Customer as a direct result of Black Rock’s design,
construction, maintenance or operation or use of the Cable Bundle, or (ii) each
and every breach, or material default by Black Rock of any of its covenants,
agreements, duties or obligations hereunder, or (iii) any violation by Black Rock
of any regulation, rule, statute or court order of any local, state or federal
governmental agency, court or body in connection with Black Rock’s
performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or (iv) damages directly
attributable to the negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Black Rock.
B. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, Customer hereby releases and agrees
to indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless Black Rock, its directors,
officers, stockholders, agents, and employees, and its respective successors or
permitted assigns from and against: (i) any and all causes of action, demands,
claims, suits, losses, judgments or costs (collectively “Damages”) which may be
brought by or asserted by any third party against Black Rock as a direct result of
Customer’s maintenance, operation or use of the Customer Fibers and IRU, or (ii)
each and every breach, or material default by Customer of any of its covenants,
agreements, duties or obligations hereunder, or (iii) any violation by Customer of
any regulation, rule, statute or court order of any local, state or federal
governmental agency, court or body in connection with Customer’s performance
of its obligations under this Agreement, or (iv) damages directly attributable to
the negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Customer.
13. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
A. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, except to the
extent caused by its own willful misconduct, neither party shall be liable to the
other party for any special, incidental, indirect, punitive or consequential damages
including, but not limited to, loss of profits or revenue, cost of capital, or claims
of customers, (whether arising out of transmission interruptions or problems, any
interruption or degradation of service or otherwise), whether foreseeable or not,
arising out of, or in connection with the liable party’s performance or non
performance of its respective obligations or breach of any provisions of this
Agreement or any other cause or nature whatsoever whether occasioned by any
design, engineering, construction, reconstruction, relocation, repair or
maintenance performed by, or failed to be performed by, such liable party,
including breach of contract, breach of warranty, tort, negligence, strict liability or
otherwise, and all claims with respect to which such special, incidental, indirect,
punitive or consequential damages are hereby specifically waived.
Packet Page 489 of 532
11 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
B. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the maximum
liability to Customer, if any, of Black Rock or its affiliates in connection with this
Agreement shall be limited, in the aggregate, to the aggregate amount of any IRU
Fees that have been paid by Customer to Black Rock with respect to the affected
portion of the Cable Bundle of which the claim is based on and at the time the
claim is made, provided, however, that this limitation of maximum liability shall
not apply to damages arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of
Black Rock or its affiliates and provided further, that this limitation shall not
restrict either party’s right to proceed for injunctive relief.
14. INSURANCE
A. Each party shall procure and maintain in force at its sole cost and expense the
following insurance coverage’s that are lawfully approved to do business in the
State of Washington in which the Customer Fibers are located, in the amounts and
with limits as set forth below:
(i) Commercial General Liability Insurance with limits not less than
$1,000,000 each occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate, on an occurrence
basis, including coverage for bodily injury, personal injury and property
damage, including, without limitation, injury or damage arising from the
operation of equipment and liability for completed operations;
(ii) workers’ compensation insurance in amounts required by applicable law
and employers’ liability insurance, with a limit of at least $500,000;
(iii) Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance covering death or injury to
any person or persons, or damage to property arising from the operation of
vehicles, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 each accident.
(iv) A Commercial Umbrella Liability policy or Excess Liability policy
providing limits of not less than $4,000,000 each occurrence and
$4,000,000 aggregate in excess of the above Commercial General
Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Employer’s Liability.
Black Rock shall require each subcontractor who is engaged by Black Rock in
connection with the construction or maintenance of the Cable Bundle to maintain
insurance in the types and amounts in Section 14.A (i), (ii) and (iii) set forth
herein.
B. Each party shall be listed as an additional insured but only with respect to the
operation and liability of the named insured on all policies set forth above held for
the benefit of the other party, except workers’ compensation. All such policies of
insurance shall provide that the additional insured shall be notified in writing at
least thirty (30) days prior to any cancellation of, or any material change or new
exclusions in the policy. Each party shall provide the other party with certificates
of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage.
Packet Page 490 of 532
12 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
15. TAXES, FEES AND IMPOSITIONS
A. Black Rock shall be responsible for and shall timely pay any and all Impositions
with respect to construction of the Cable Bundle. Black Rock shall be responsible
for and shall timely pay any and all Impositions with respect to operation of the
Cable Bundle.
B. Customer shall be responsible for all Impositions, whether assessed against
Customer or Black Rock, which result from Customer’s operation and/or use of
the Customer Fibers including any and all taxes, fees or assessments based on
revenue derived from such operation and/or use by Customer.
16. DEFAULT
A. Customer’s Default:
(i) With respect to any other material obligations of Customer hereunder,
unless a shorter time period for cure is expressly provided elsewhere in
this Agreement, in the event Customer shall fail to perform such an
obligation as set forth in this Agreement and such failure shall continue for
a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of such failure to
Customer, Customer shall be in material default hereunder; provided,
however, that where such failure cannot reasonably be cured within such
thirty (30) day period, if Customer shall proceed promptly to cure the
same within the aforesaid period and continues to prosecute such cure
with due diligence, the time for curing such failure shall be extended for
such period of time as may reasonably be necessary to complete such cure;
and provided further that if Customer certifies in good faith to Black Rock
in writing that a failure has been cured, such failure shall be deemed to be
cured unless Black Rock otherwise notifies Customer in writing within
fifteen (15) days of receipt of such notice from Customer.
(ii) Customer shall be in material default hereunder (i) immediately upon the
making by Customer of a general assignment for the benefit of its
creditors, the filing by Customer of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or
the filing by Customer of any petition or answer seeking, consenting to, or
acquiescing in reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, composition,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief; or (ii) one hundred twenty (120)
days after the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or other
insolvency protection against Customer which is not dismissed within
such one hundred twenty (120) days.
(iii) Upon failure to cure any material default by Customer, after written notice
thereof from Black Rock, Black Rock may (i) in accordance with the
terms herein, take such action as it determines, in its sole discretion, to be
necessary to correct the default and recover from Customer, Black Rock’s
reasonable costs incurred in correcting such default; (ii) terminate any and
Packet Page 491 of 532
13 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
all of its obligations hereunder with respect to any portion of the Cable
Bundle as to which the Actual Delivery Date has not yet occurred or as to
which the grant of the IRU has not yet become effective, and in such case,
Black Rock may apply any and all amounts previously paid by Customer
hereunder with respect to such affected portion of the Cable Bundle
toward the payment of any other amounts then or thereafter payable by
Customer hereunder; and (iii) suspend Customer’s access to and right to
use any Customer Fibers, until such time as all amounts then due and
owing have been paid; (iv) pursue any legal remedies it may have under
applicable law or principles of equity relating to such default, including
specific performance.
B. Black Rock’s Default:
(i) With respect to any other material obligations of Black Rock hereunder, in
the event Black Rock shall fail to perform such an obligation and such
failure shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice of
such failure to Black Rock, Black Rock shall be in material default
hereunder; provided, however, that where such failure cannot reasonably
be cured within such thirty (30) day period, if Black Rock shall proceed
promptly to cure the same within the aforesaid period and continues to
prosecute such cure with due diligence, the time for curing such failure
shall be extended for such period of time as may reasonably be necessary
to complete such cure; and provided further that if Black Rock certifies in
good faith to Customer in writing that a failure has been cured, such
failure shall be deemed to be cured unless Customer otherwise notifies
Black Rock in writing within fifteen (15) days of receipt of such notice
from Black Rock.
(ii) Black Rock shall be in material default hereunder (i) immediately upon
the making by Black Rock of a general assignment for the benefit of its
creditors, the filing by Black Rock of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or
the filing by Black Rock of any petition or answer seeking, consenting to,
or acquiescing in reorganization, arrangement, adjustment, composition,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief; or (ii) one hundred twenty (120)
days after the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or other
insolvency protection against Black Rock which is not dismissed within
such one hundred twenty (120) days.
(iii) Upon failure to cure any material default by Black Rock, Customer may
take such action as it determines, in its sole discretion, to be necessary to
correct the default, at Black Rock’s sole expense, including, if reasonably
required, curing any defaults under any Underlying Rights, and/or
obtaining such Underlying Rights as may reasonably be required for
Customer to cure such Black Rock default. In such event, Customer may
recover from Black Rock its reasonable Costs in correcting such default,
and Customer may also pursue any legal or equitable remedies it may have
Packet Page 492 of 532
14 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
under applicable law or principles of equity relating to such default
including specific performance.
C. Except as set forth to the contrary herein; any right or remedy of Customer or
Black Rock provided in this Agreement shall be cumulative and without prejudice
to the exercise of any other right or remedy.
17. TAX TREATMENT
A. It is understood and agreed that Black Rock must and does maintain legal title to
the entire Cable Bundle, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood and agreed between the parties
that the grant of the IRU hereunder shall be treated for accounting and federal and
all applicable state and local tax purposes as the sale and purchase of the
Customer Fibers, and that on or after the Actual Delivery Date, Customer shall be
treated as the owner of the Customer Fibers for such purposes. The parties agree
to file their respective income tax returns, property tax returns, and other returns
and reports for their respective Impositions on such basis and, except as otherwise
required by law, not to take any positions inconsistent therewith.
18. FORCE MAJEURE
A. Neither party shall be in default under this Agreement if, and to the extent that,
any failure or delay in such party’s performance of one or more of its obligations
hereunder is caused by any of the following conditions, each of which shall
constitute a force majeure, and the affected party shall be released from liability
and shall suffer no prejudice for the failure of performance of its obligation or
obligations, and, if the construction schedule is affected, the Estimated Delivery
Date for the Cable Bundle or the Customer Fibers, shall be excused and extended
for and during the period of any such delay: any circumstance beyond the
reasonable control of the affected party, including without limitation, any change
of circumstances not reasonably foreseen at the time this Agreement was executed
which is beyond the reasonable control of the affected party, and which materially
affects the ability of the affected party to perform its obligations hereunder; any
act of God; fire; flood; lack of or delay in transportation; the adoption or
amendment of government codes, ordinances, laws, rules, regulations or
restrictions that materially impair the affected party’s performance hereunder; war
or civil disorder; strikes, lock-outs or other labor disputes; failure of a third party
to grant or recognize an Underlying Right (provided Black Rock has made timely
and reasonable commercial efforts to obtain the same).
19. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. Initially, the parties agree to negotiate in good faith to attempt to settle any
disputes or claims that may arise out of or in relation to this Agreement. If after
good faith negotiations, the parties cannot reach mutual resolution to any dispute
or claim arising out of or in relation to this Agreement, or any breach of this
Packet Page 493 of 532
15 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
Agreement, the parties must mutually agree to settle the dispute or claim pursuant
to the Rules of Mandatory Arbitration as provided by the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, Washington, notwithstanding that the claim for relief or
dollar amount of any claim may exceed the limits of such arbitration. Either party
may initiate arbitration by filing a complaint with the Snohomish County Superior
Court. The prevailing party at such arbitration shall be entitled to its costs,
including reasonable attorney’s fees as set by the arbitrator.
20. ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER
A. Customer shall not assign, encumber or otherwise transfer this Agreement or all
or any portion of its rights or obligations hereunder to any other person or entity
without the prior written consent of Black Rock, which consent will not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed provided that such assignment or transfer shall
be subject to the assignee’s or transferee’s assumption of the obligations under
this Agreement.
B. Upon written notice to Customer, Black Rock may assign or transfer this
Agreement including its rights and obligations hereunder without Customer’s
consent, provided that any assignment or transfer by Black Rock shall fully
recognize and preserve the Customers rights under this Agreement.
21. REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A. Each party represents and warrants to the other that: (i) it has the full right and
authority to enter into, execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this
Agreement; (ii) all corporate actions necessary to enter into this Agreement and to
perform all of the transactions contemplated hereby have been taken; (iii) this
Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation enforceable against
such party in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency,
creditors’ rights and general equitable principles; (iv) its execution of and
performance under this Agreement shall not violate any applicable existing
regulations, rules, statutes or court orders of any local, state or federal government
agency, court or body; and (v) no consents of any third party or governmental
body are required for the execution or performance of this Agreement.
B. Customer and Black Rock each agree to cooperate with and support the other in
complying with any requirements applicable to their respective rights and
obligations hereunder by any governmental or regulatory agency or authority. So
long as any such action would not violate the terms of any Underlying Rights,
Black Rock agrees, upon request of Customer, and at Customer’s expense, to
execute, file and/or record such documents or instruments as Customer shall deem
reasonably necessary or appropriate to evidence or safeguard Customer’s rights
under the IRU.
C. Black Rock represents and warrants that it is not in default under any of the
Underlying Rights to the extent that such default would permit the grantor of such
Packet Page 494 of 532
16 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
Underlying Rights to terminate such Underlying Rights prior to its stated
expiration date, or would otherwise materially, adversely impair or affect
Customer’s ability to use the Customer Fibers or exercise its rights with respect
thereto, as provided and permitted hereunder, and, to the best of its knowledge, no
grantor is in default under any Underlying Rights.
D. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, BLACK ROCK MAKES
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE
CUSTOMER FIBERS AND ASSOCIATED PROPERTY OR FACILITIES OR
DELIVERABLES HEREUNDER, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE,
AND ALL SUCH WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY
DISCLAIMED. THE WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT
CONSTITUTE THE ONLY WARRANTIES MADE BY BLACK ROCK TO
CUSTOMER WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ARE MADE IN
LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WRITTEN OR ORAL, STATUTORY,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
22. MISCELLANEOUS
A. No Waiver: The failure of either party hereto to give notice of default or breach
of any provision of this Agreement or to enforce any of the provisions of this
Agreement, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such
default or breach or its right to enforce any such provision at the later date, but the
same shall nevertheless be and remain in full force and effect.
B. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the domestic laws of the State of Washington, without reference
to its choice of law principles. Any litigation based hereon, or arising out of or in
connection with a default by either party in the performance of its obligations
hereunder, shall be brought and maintained exclusively in the courts of the State
of Washington and each party hereby irrevocable submits to the jurisdiction of
such courts for the purpose of any such litigation and irrevocably agrees to be
bound by any judgment rendered thereby in connection with such litigation.
Packet Page 495 of 532
17 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
C. Notices: Unless otherwise provided herein, all notices and communications
concerning this Agreement shall be in writing, addressed to the other party as
follows:
To Black Rock: Black Rock Cable, Inc.
Attention: Bob Warshawer
1512 Fairview St.
Bellingham, WA 98229
Telephone No.: (360) 738-3116
To Customer:
Stephen Clifton, Director
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
425-771-0251
Stephen.Clifton@EdmondsWa.gov
or at such other address as either party may designate from time to time in writing
to the other party. Notices shall be hand delivered, sent by U.S. mail, postage
prepaid, or by commercial overnight delivery service, or transmitted by facsimile,
and shall be deemed served or delivered to the addressee or its office when
actually received at the address for notice specified above when hand delivered,
upon confirmation of sending when sent by fax, on the day after being sent when
sent by overnight delivery service, or three (3) days after deposit in the mail when
sent by U.S. mail.
D. Captions and Headings: The captions or headings in this Agreement are strictly
for convenience and shall not be considered in interpreting this Agreement or as
amplifying or limiting any of its content. Words in this Agreement which import
the singular connotation shall be interpreted as plural, and words which import the
plural connotation shall be interpreted as singular, as the identity of the parties or
objects referred to may require. All listing of items shall not be taken to be
exclusive, but shall include other items, whether similar or dissimilar to those
listed, as the context reasonably requires.
E. Time is of the Essence: All actions, activities, consents, approvals and other
undertakings of the parties in this Agreement shall be performed in a reasonable
and timely manner, it being expressly acknowledged and understood that time is
of the essence in the performance of obligations required to be performed by a
date expressly specified herein.
F. Entire Agreement: The fact that this Agreement may have been either fully
negotiated between or jointly drafted by the parties, shall not affect the
interpretation of any provision of this Agreement in a manner adverse to such
party or otherwise prejudice or impair the rights of such party. This Agreement
constitutes the entire and final agreement and understanding between the parties
Packet Page 496 of 532
18 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements
relating to the subject matter hereof, which are of no further force or effect. The
Exhibits referred to herein are integral parts hereof and are hereby made a part of
this Agreement. To the extent that any of the provisions of any Exhibit hereto are
inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement, the terms of this
Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may only be modified or supplemented
by an instrument in writing executed by a duly authorized representative of each
party and delivered to the party relying on the writing.
G. Relationship of the Parties: The relationship between Customer and Black Rock
shall not be that of partners, agents, or joint ventures for one another, and nothing
contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a partnership or agency
agreement between them for any purposes, including, but not limited to federal
income tax purposes. Customer and Black Rock, in performing any of their
obligations hereunder, shall be independent contractors or independent parties and
shall discharge their contractual obligations at their own risk subject, however, to
the terms and conditions hereof.
H. Severability: If any term, covenant or condition contained herein shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable in any respect under the laws governing this
Agreement, so long as such invalidity does not materially impair the benefit of
this Agreement to either party, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be
affected thereby, and each term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be
valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
I. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all
of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
J. Survival: Any provision of this Agreement, which by its nature extends beyond
the term hereof or which is required to ensure that the parties to fully exercise
their rights and perform their obligations hereunder shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement for any cause whatsoever.
K. Agreement Binding: This Agreement and each of the parties’ respective rights
and obligations under this Agreement, shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and each of their respective successors and permitted
assigns.
Packet Page 497 of 532
19 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Customer and Black Rock have executed this Agreement as of
the date first above written.
CUSTOMER
_______________________________
Signature
_______________________________
Printed Name
_______________________________
Title
________________________________
Date
BLACK ROCK CABLE, INC.
________________________________
Signature
________________________________
Printed Name
________________________________
Title
________________________________
Date
ATTEST BY:
________________________________
Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
________________________________
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
________________________________
Date
Packet Page 498 of 532
20 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
EXHIBIT A
TO THE IRU AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
BLACK ROCK CABLE, INC. and CITY OF EDMONDS
Connection Points
From the City of Edmonds, Black Rock demarc, located at 7100 210th St SW, Edmonds WA to
Black Rock demarc at the Snohomish County Data Center, located at 3000 Rockefeller Ave,
Everett WA.
Identification of Customer Fibers
One (1) strand(s), Single Mode Fiber to be designated by Black Rock within the Cable Bundle.
The estimated distance between the two connection points is 37 km (23Miles) .
Binding Delivery Date
The Binding Delivery Date will be sixty (60) days from the date of execution of this IRU
agreement.
Franchise Fee
Black Rock will pay the Customer a Franchise Fee of five percent (5%) for the right to operate
fiber within the Edmonds City Limits.
IRU Fee
The Customer will pay Black Rock a one-time IRU fee of Fifty-Seven Thousand, Seven
Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($57,750.00) plus applicable Washington State Sales Tax.
Maintenance Fee
The Maintenance Fees will be comprised of two (2) parts:
1. The maintenance fee for pole attachments, pole transfers, and damages will be One
Dollar ($1.00) per strand mile per month for an approximate cost of Two Hundred
Seventy-Six Dollars and No Cents ($276.00) per year.
2. For major undergrounding of overhead fiber routes and/or relocations due to Edmonds
City ordinance, orders or plans due to City Projects, the Customer will share the costs of
moving the Cable Bundle at pro rata cost. Pro Rata means the affected City share will be
determined by dividing number of fibers owned by affected City into the total number of
fibers used by all customers at that location. By way of example and for illustrative
Packet Page 499 of 532
21 of 21 Rev. 03.08.12
purposes only, if a relocation project will cost $100,000.00; the Cable Bundle has 60
fibers with 40 of those fiber “lit” and actively used by twenty (20) Black Rock Customers
(two (2) fibers/customer), the allocated share of relocation cost to affected City would be
$5,000.00 ($100,000.00 divided by the number of active fibers in the Fiber Bundle).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be interpreted to waive any right or
obligation under any applicable franchise agreement.
Black Rock will notify the Customer in writing at least one hundred eighty days (180)
days in advance of any major underground work and specify any Customer costs
associated with the work.
Packet Page 500 of 532
AM-5192 11.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted For:Shawn Hunstock Submitted By:Debra Sharp
Department:Finance
Committee: Finance Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
October 2012 Budget Amendment Ordinance.
Recommendation
Approval of the October 2012 Budget Amendment
Previous Council Action
Reviewed by Finance Committee
Narrative
The budget amendment includes three changes to the salary range table in Exhibit F. A Senior Planner
position has been added to the list. There were cost savings in the planning department this year due to
one of the planner's out on leave without pay. R. Chave would like to promote an Associate Planner to
Senior Planner. The Finance Director is working on a re-organization of the finance department and is
requesting that one of the Accountant positions be promoted to Accounting Supervisor. The third change
to the salary range table is the addition of the HR Analyst position which has already been before Council
for approval. The only change in the amendment is to add the position to the salary range table.
There are four amendments requesting additional general fund money. There are two amendments
related to fiber projects for a total of $39,209. The finance department is requesting an additional $4,500
for work that is being performed by EDEN, the City's software vendor, to convert the City's chart of
accounts that is required by the State Auditor's Office. The fourth amendment request has been before
Council previously. The fleet department is asking to go forward with the propane conversion and
requesting a transfer from the General Fund in the amount of $105,100 and a transfer from the Street
Fund in the amount of $6,600. The fleet department is also requesting budget authority in Equipment
Rental Fund in the amount of $111,700 for the conversion of the vehicles.
One of the last two items is a request to transfer $2,500 from the Criminal Investigation Fund (004) to the
Drug Enforcement Fund (104) and close the Criminal Investigation Fund. The last item is a correction of
the July budget amendment related to the debt refinancing entry.
Attachments
October 2012 Budget Amendment Ordinance
Form Review
Packet Page 501 of 532
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Shawn Hunstock 10/11/2012 10:40 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 10:49 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:07 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Debra Sharp Started On: 10/11/2012 10:25 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 502 of 532
1
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3893 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund
Transfers and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations
and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and
federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2012
Budget; and
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 3893 adopting the final budget for the
fiscal year 2012 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E and F
hereto, which exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The City Council authorizes the Finance Director to close the Criminal
Investigation Revolving Fund (004) and the Fire Donations Fund (131).
Packet Page 503 of 532
2
Section 3. Chapter 3.07 ECC, entitled “Criminal Investigation Contingency
Fund,” is hereby repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY ___
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 504 of 532
3
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2012, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 3893 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND
EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2012.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 505 of 532
EXHIBIT “A”: Budget Amendments by Revenue (October 2012)
4
ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. 2012
FUND FUND 3861 3882 3886 3891 3893 Amended
NO.DESCRIPTION 11/22/2011 4/27/2012 5/25/2012 7/27/2012 8/31/2012 Oct 2012 Budget
001 General Fund 33,006,588$ 7,930$ -$ 2,656$ -$ -$ 33,017,174$
004 Criminal Investigations - - - - - - -
006 Emergency/Financial Reserve - - - - - - -
009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 600,550 - - - - - 600,550
010 Reserve Fund 2,200 - - - - - 2,200
011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - - 244,000 - - 244,000
012 Contingency Reserve Fund - - - - 5,282,000 - 5,282,000
104 Drug Enforcement Fund 28,200 - - - - 2,500 30,700
111 Street Fund 1,313,650 - - - - - 1,313,650
112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,006,864 - - - 833,238 - 2,840,102
113 Multimodal Transportation Fd.- - - - - - -
116 Building Maintenance 56,860 - - - - - 56,860
117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 58,325 - - - - - 58,325
118 Memorial Street Tree 28 - - - - - 28
120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 69,200 - - (17,250) - - 51,950
121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 20,140 - - - - - 20,140
122 Youth Scholarship Fund 2,525 - - - - - 2,525
123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 19,000 - - - - - 19,000
125 Park Acq/Improvement 590,850 77,000 103,000 - - - 770,850
126 Special Capital Fund 590,800 - - - - - 590,800
127 Gifts Catalog Fund 10,759 - - - - - 10,759
129 Special Projects Fund 313,004 169,000 - - - - 482,004
130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 119,850 - - - - - 119,850
132 Parks Construction 1,185,000 104,414 - - - - 1,289,414
136 Parks Trust Fund 177 - - - - - 177
137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd 14,600 - - - - - 14,600
138 Sister City Commission 5,230 - - - - - 5,230
211 Lid Fund Control 46,700 - - - - - 46,700
213 Lid Guaranty Fund 46,725 105,000 - - - - 151,725
234 Ltgo Bond Debt Service Fund 478,573 - - - - - 478,573
411 Combined Utility Operation 15,306,920 150,000 - - - - 15,456,920
412 Combined Utility Const/Improve 7,888,400 - - - - - 7,888,400
414 Capital Improvements Reserve 1,126,377 457,012 - - - - 1,583,389
511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,076,456 - - - - 111,700 1,188,156
617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 94,423 - - - - - 94,423
631 Transportation Benefit District 600,000 - - - - - 600,000
Totals 66,678,974$ 1,070,356$ 103,000$ 229,406$ 6,115,238$ 114,200$ 74,311,174$
Packet Page 506 of 532
EXHIBIT “B”: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (October 2012)
5
ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. ORD. NO. 2012
FUND FUND 3861 3882 3886 3891 3893 Amended
NO.DESCRIPTION 11/22/2011 4/27/2012 5/25/2012 7/27/2012 8/31/2012 Oct 2012 Budget
001 General Fund 32,949,288$ 211,384$ 103,000$ 2,656$ 2,015,000$ 148,809 35,430,137$
004 Criminal Investigations - - - - - 2,500 2,500
006 Emergency/Financial Reserve - - - - 1,927,600 - 1,927,600
009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 619,811 - - - - - 619,811
010 Reserve Fund - - - - 1,339,400 - 1,339,400
011 Risk Management Reserve Fund - - - - - -
012 Contingency Reserve Fund - - - - - - -
104 Drug Enforcement Fund 80,233 - - - - - 80,233
111 Street Fund 1,604,948 20,200 - - - 6,600 1,631,748
112 Combined Street Const/Improve 2,075,625 31,803 - - 833,238 - 2,940,666
113 Multimodal Transportation Fd.- - - - - - -
116 Building Maintenance 245,000 - - - - - 245,000
117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 134,550 - - - - - 134,550
118 Memorial Street Tree - - - - - - -
120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 73,750 - - (17,250) - - 56,500
121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,086 - - - - - 26,086
122 Youth Scholarship Fund 4,000 - - - - - 4,000
123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 19,000 - - - - - 19,000
125 Park Acq/Improvement 875,000 77,000 103,000 - - - 1,055,000
126 Special Capital Fund 697,717 - - - - - 697,717
127 Gifts Catalog Fund 12,275 - - - - - 12,275
129 Special Projects Fund 313,000 170,500 - - - - 483,500
130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 172,005 - - - - - 172,005
132 Parks Construction 1,187,000 210,000 - (20,800) - - 1,376,200
136 Parks Trust Fund - 6,930 - - - - 6,930
137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fd - - - - - - -
138 Sister City Commission 4,600 - - - - - 4,600
211 Lid Fund Control 46,500 105,000 - - - - 151,500
213 Lid Guaranty Fund - - - 244,000 - - 244,000
234 Ltgo Bond Debt Service Fund 478,573 - - - - - 478,573
411 Combined Utility Operation 15,598,246 191,481 - (419,326) - 3,881 15,374,282
412 Combined Utility Const/Improve 10,465,068 482,611 - 40,000 312,000 - 11,299,679
414 Capital Improvements Reserve 1,126,376 457,012 - (11,873) - - 1,571,515
511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,321,334 - - - - 111,700 1,433,034
617 Firemen'S Pension Fund 123,515 - - - - - 123,515
631 Transportation Benefit District 600,000 - - - - - 600,000
Totals 70,853,500$ 1,963,921$ 206,000$ (182,593)$ 6,427,238$ 273,490$ 79,541,556$
Packet Page 507 of 532
EXHIBIT “C”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
6
Department BARS Category Debit Credit Description
General Fund 001 000 620 558 600 110 00 Salaries 685
General Fund 001 000 620 558 600 110 00 Salaries 685
General Fund 001 000 620 558 600 230 00 Benefits 65
General Fund 001 000 620 558 600 230 00 Benefits 65
General Fund 001 000 310 514 230 110 00 Salaries 675
General Fund 001 000 310 514 230 230 00 Benefits 65
General Fund 001 000 310 514 100 410 00 Professional Services 740
General Fund 001 000 310 514 230 410 00 Professional Services 4,500
General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 4,500
General Fund 001 000 310 518 870 480 00 Repair and Maintenance 12,000
General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 12,000
General Fund 001 000 310 518 870 480 00 Repair and Maintenance 27,209
General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 27,209
Equipment Rental 511 100 657 594 480 640 00 Equipment 111,700
Equipment Rental 511 100 000 397 001 000 00 Transfer 105,100
Equipment Rental 511 100 000 397 111 000 00 Transfer 6,600
General Fund 001 000 390 597 511 550 00 Transfer 105,100
General Fund 001 000 390 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 105,100
Street Fund 111 000 653 597 511 550 00 Transfer 6,600
Street Fund 111 000 653 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 6,600
Criminal Investigation 004 100 410 597 104 550 00 Transfer 2,000
Criminal Investigation 004 200 410 597 104 550 00 Transfer 500
Criminal Investigation 004 100 410 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 2,000
Criminal Investigation 004 200 410 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 500
Drug Enforcement 104 000 000 397 004 000 00 Transfer 2,500
Drug Enforcement 104 000 410 508 000 000 00 Ending Fund Balance 2,500
Utility Fund 411 000 652 592 300 830 00 Debt Interest 1,350
Senior Planner
Salary Range
Accounting
Supervisor
Position
Chart of Accounts
Update
6th & Main-Move
City/WSDOT fiber
Fiber to City Park
& Port of Edmonds
Propane
Conversion
Close 004 Fund
Correct July Debt
Packet Page 508 of 532
EXHIBIT “D”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
7
Above is a summary of the changes by fund:
Fund Name and Title: Budget Amendment Summary
General Fund 001 Chart of Account Update
6th & Main-Move City/WSDOT
Fiber to City Park & the Port of Edmonds
Propane Conversion
Criminal Investigation Fund 004 Close 004 Fund
Drug Enforcement Fund 104 Close 004 Fund
Street Fund 111 Propane Conversion
Utility Fund 411 Correct July Debt Budget Amendment
Equipment Rental 511 Propane Conversion
Fund Number
Change in
Beginning Fund
Balance Revenue Expense
Change in Ending
Fund Balance
001 148,809 (148,809)
004 2,500 (2,500)
104 2,500 - 2,500
111 6,600 (6,600)
411 3,881 (3,881)
511 111,700 111,700 0
Total Change 0 114,200 273,490 (159,290)
Packet Page 509 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
8
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
001 General Salaries 001.000.620.558.600.110.00 685
001 General Salaries 001.000.620.558.600.110.00 (685)
001 General Benefits 001.000.620.558.600.230.00 65
001 General Benefits 001.000.620.558.600.230.00 (65)
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
-
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$
Rob Chave
Development Services Department
Add Senior Planner salary range
The current salary schedule in the 2012 budget does not include a salary range for "Senior
Planner". One of our current Associate Planners (Kernen Lien) has the experience and
knowledge required to be a Senior Planner, and is scheduled to move up from an Associate
to a Senior Planner. The 2012 budget should be amended to add the position:
Senior Planner range: $65,836 to $88,227
One of the department's planners was on leave without pay during 2012, so there are
savings sufficient to pay for Mr. Lien's promotion. This budget amendment will effect that
change. This budget amendment will not result in any increase in expenditures.
Packet Page 510 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
9
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund Salaries 001.000.310.514.230.110.00 675
001 General Fund Benefits 001.000.310.514.230.230.00 65
001 General Fund Professional Svcs 001.000.310.514.100.410.00 (740)
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)-$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$
Shawn Hunstock
Finance Department
Accounting Supervisor Position
The administration is recommending elimination of one of the two Accountant positions in
Finance and replacing that with an Accounting Supervisor position. The Accounting
Supervisor duties will be very much like the duties of the Accountant position that was added
to the department with the 2012 budget. The new position also includes the responsibility of
supervising two Utility Accounting Technician positions and two Accounting Technician
positions within the department.
Staff, management and labor have suggested this is a good way to provide more direct, daily
oversight and interaction with the four positions that will be supervised by the new Accounting
Supervisor position.
Packet Page 511 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
10
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund Professional Serv. 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 4,500
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)4,500$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 (4,500)
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(4,500)$
Shawn Hunstock
Finance Department
Chart of Accounts Update
The State Auditor's Office is requiring all cities adopt many changes to their chart of accounts
starting in 2013. This budget amendment would pay for the programming that would be
necessary to make these changes in our EDEN accounting system.
This is a one-time only cost. The work will be completed by EDEN Financial Systems staff in
November or early December.
Packet Page 512 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
11
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund Repair & Maint 001.000.310.518.870.480.00 12,000$
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)12,000$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund 001.000.310.508.000.000.00 (12,000)$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(12,000)$
Carl Nelson
Information Services
6th and Main - Move City/WSDOT Fiber.
The City/WSDOT fiber passes through the corner of 6th and Main on poles that will be taken
down, as part of the Main Street improvement project, and is required to be placed
underground. WSDOT will be doing the splicing of the fiber and the City will be doing the
undergrounding and run of additional fiber to accompdate the change in fiber path. The
estimated expense for the City's portion is $12,000. This expenditure was not part of the
2012 budget.
Packet Page 513 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
12
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund Repair & Maint 001.000.310.518.870.480.00 27,209$
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)27,209$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 27,209$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)27,209$
Carl Nelson
Information Services
Fiber to City Park & to Port of Edmond
The City wishes to extend fiber to the City Park facility so as to replace a T-1 it currently uses
saving more than $410/mo ($4,920/year). The City also wishes to provide the Port of
Edmonds Harbor Square facility fiber access.
WSDOT wishes to connect its toll booths on the northeast corner of Dayton and 104 to its
fiber pairs in a vault on the north side of the City Public Saftey building through the City's
connection at the WWTP.
WSDOT has conduit that crosses under 104 and Dayton, as well goes up the east side of 104
past City Park. In exchange for the fiber cross connect, WSDOT will allow the City to use
existing WSDOT conduit along edge of HiWay 104 and under 104 and Dayton.
The esitmated cost to connect City Park and cross 104 and Dayton is $27,209, for little over a
5 year payback and putting the City into position to provide service to harbor square.
Packet Page 514 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
13
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
511 Equipment Rental Machinery & Equip 511.100.657.594.480.640.00 111,700
001 General Fund Transfer 001.000.390.597.511.550.00 105,100
111 Street Fund Transfer 111.000.653.597.511.550.00 6,600
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)223,400$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
511 Equipment Rental Transfer 511.100.000.397.001.000.00 (105,100)
511 Equipment Rental Transfer 511.100.000.397.111.000.00 (6,600)
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (111,700)$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
001 General Fund 001.000.390.508.000.000.00 (105,100)
111 Street Fund 111.000.653.508.000.000.00 (6,600)
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(111,700)$
Dave Sitauer
Fleet Department
Propane Conversion
TheFleet Division will be converting 16 police vehicles and one Street Division flatbed truck
to a new cost-effective alternative propane fuel system. For the period of the five-year
contract, Blue Star Gas Company has guaranteed a fuel purchase cost difference at least
$1.25 for the first two years and $1.00 for the final three years below the official weekly
Seattle Regular Unleaded rack price. Investment payback for each vehicle has been
estimated to occur within the first 18-20 months.
Packet Page 515 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
14
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
004 Criminal Investigations Transfer 004.100.410.597.104.550.00 2,000
004 Criminal Investigations Transfer 004.200.410.597.104.550.00 500
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)2,500$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
104 Drug Enforcement 104.000.000.397.004.000.00 (2,500)
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease (2,500)$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
004 Criminal Investigations 004.100.410.508.000.000.00 (2,000)
004 Criminal Investigations 004.200.410.508.000.000.00 (500)
104 Drug Enforcement 104.000.410.508.000.000.00 2,500
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)-$
Shawn Hunstock
Finance Department
Close 004 Fund
Fund 004, the Criminal Investigations Fund, has not had activity for several years. Staff is
proposing to close this fund and move the $2,500 currently in that fund to the Drug
Enforcement Fund 104. The money can be used as a revolving fund in the 104 fund for
criminal investigations, as it was once used in the 004 fund. It is not necessary to continue to
maintain these resources in a separate fund (004) though.
The Police Department is in agreement with moving this money into the Drug Enforcement
Fund 104.
Packet Page 516 of 532
EXHIBIT “E”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
15
Prepared By:
Department:
Description on Budget Amendment Summary:
Budget Amendment Detailed Description:
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fund # Fund Title Object BARS Number Amount
411 Utility Fund Debt Interest 411.000.652.592.300.830.00 1,350
411 Utility Fund Debt Interest 411.000.654.592.300.830.00 2,531
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)3,881$
Revenue (Increase) Decrease
Fund Fund Title Revenue Source BARS Number Amount
Total Revenue (Increase) Decrease -$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Fund Fund Title BARS Number Amount
411 Utility Fund 411.000.654.508.000.000.00 (3,881)
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)(3,881)$
Deb Sharp
Finance Department
Correct July Debt Entry Budget Amendment
When calculating the July Budget Amendment, the incorrect interest amount was used to
reverse out the 2003 water/sewer revenue bond interest which caused a negative budget
appropriation. This budget amendement brings the budget to zero for these two line items.
Packet Page 517 of 532
EXHIBIT “F”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
16
Elected Officials Minimum Maximum
Council Member Position $7,200 $14,400
Judge 74,043 74,043
Mayor 113,210 113,210
Non-Represented Minimum Maximum
Accounting Supervisor $69,128 $92,638
Assistant Building Official $66,905 $100,358
Assistant Police Chief 94,402 141,604
Associate Planner 57,740 86,610
Building Official 85,237 127,855
Capital Projects Manager 57,740 86,610
Chief Information Officer 76,071 114,107
City Clerk 85,237 127,855
City Engineer 94,402 141,604
Community Services Director 103,568 155,352
Court Administrator 76,071 114,107
Cultural Services Manager 66,905 100,358
Development Services Director (Acting)13,000 13,000
Engineering Program Manager I 57,740 86,610
Executive Assistant-Confidential 48,574 72,861
Executive Assistant to the Mayor 57,740 86,610
Facilities Manager 66,905 100,358
Finance Director 103,568 155,352
Fleet Manager 66,905 100,358
Human Resources Analyst 54,154 72,500
Human Resources Manager 85,237 127,855
Parks And Recreation Director 103,568 155,352
Parks Maintenance Manager 66,905 100,358
Planning Manager 85,237 127,855
Police Chief 103,568 155,352
Public Works Director 103,568 155,352
Appendix
Salary Range Table (Annual Salary) *
Packet Page 518 of 532
EXHIBIT “F”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
17
Non-Represented (continued)Minimum Maximum
Recreation Manager 66,905 100,358
Recycling Coordinator 48,574 72,861
Senior Planner 65,836 88,227
Senior Utilities Engineer 66,905 100,358
Stormwater Engineering Manager 76,071 114,107
Street/Storm Manager 76,071 114,107
Transportation Engineer 76,071 114,107
Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager 85,237 127,855
Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor 76,071 114,107
Water/Sewer Manager 76,071 114,107
Police Non-Commissioned Minimum Maximum
Animal Control Officer $46,740 $57,948
Domestic Violence Coordinator 46,740 57,948
Part Time Administrative Assistant 39,144 48,552
Police Services Assistant 41,748 51,756
Property Officer/Evidence Technician 44,052 54,612
Senior Animal Control Officer 49,164 61,008
Police Guild Minimum Maximum
Corporal $77,652 $79,656
Police Officer 1st Class 62,520 74,088
Police Officer 2nd Class 55,488 57,480
Sergeant 83,076 85,188
Teamsters Minimum Maximum
Building Maintenance Operator $51,624 $62,784
Cemetery Sexton 54,204 65,940
Custodian 36,708 44,592
Electo-Mechanical Specialist 59,808 72,696
Lead Storm Water Worker 59,808 72,696
Lead Water Maintenance Worker 59,808 72,696
Maintenance Custodian 38,532 46,836
Salary Range Table (Annual Salary) *
Packet Page 519 of 532
EXHIBIT “F”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
18
Teamsters (continued)Minimum Maximum
Maintenance Worker II 49,152 59,808
Nursery Person 49,152 59,808
Parks Maintenance Lead Worker 59,808 72,696
Parks Maintenance Mechanic 51,624 62,784
Parks Maintenance Worker II 49,152 59,808
Pretreatment 56,868 69,252
Senior Mechanic 54,204 65,940
Sewer Lead Worker 59,808 72,696
Sewer Maintenance Worker I 44,592 54,204
Sewer Maintenance Worker II 49,152 62,784
Storm Maintenance Worker I 42,432 51,624
Storm Maintenance Worker II 49,152 62,784
Street Lead Worker 59,808 72,696
Street Maintenance Worker I 42,432 51,624
Street Maintenance Worker II 49,152 59,808
Traffic Control Technician 51,624 62,784
Vehicle & Equipment Mechanic 51,624 62,784
Water Maintenance Worker II 49,152 62,784
Water Meter Reader 40,428 49,152
Water Quality Control Technician 54,204 65,940
WWTP Laboratory Technician 49,152 69,252
WWTP Lead Maintenance Mechanic 59,808 72,696
WWTP Lead Person 59,808 72,696
WWTP Instrument Tech/Plant Electrician 56,868 69,252
WWTP Maintenance Mechanic 51,624 62,784
WWTP Maintenance Worker I 44,592 54,204
WWTP Mechanic II 54,204 65,940
WWTP Operator 54,204 65,940
SEIU Minimum Maximum
Accountant $64,728 $80,292
Accounting Assistant 42,900 53,196
Accounting Technician 47,964 59,484
Administrative Assistant 47,964 59,484
Code Enforcement Officer 57,168 70,836
Salary Range Table (Annual Salary) *
Packet Page 520 of 532
EXHIBIT “F”: Budget Amendments (October 2012)
19
SEIU (continued)Minimum Maximum
Court Clerk 40,296 49,956
Deputy City Clerk 47,964 59,484
Development Services Technician III 53,892 66,828
Engineering Technician II 53,892 66,828
Engineering Technician III 61,056 75,684
Environmental Education Coordinator 61,056 75,684
Executive Assistant 57,168 70,836
GIS Analyst 64,728 80,292
Gymnastics Instructor 16,002 19,824
Information Systems Specialist 61,056 75,684
Interpretive Specialist 16,002 19,824
Inventory Control Assistant 42,900 53,196
Network Support Technician 61,056 75,684
Parks & Recreation Office Supervisor 50,964 63,240
Permit Coordinator II 47,964 59,484
Plans Examiner 57,168 70,836
Preschool Director 32,004 39,648
Probation Officer 50,964 63,240
Recreation Coordinator 61,056 75,684
Senior Comb Building Inspector 64,728 80,292
Senior Office Assistant 40,296 49,956
Senior Office Assistant - Cultural Services 40,296 49,956
Stormwater Engineering Technician 53,892 66,828
Utility Accounting Technician 47,964 59,484
Contract Positions Minimum Maximum
Senior Executive Asst To City Council $27,665 $27,665
Salary Range Table (Annual Salary) *
* Amounts shown do not include longevity, premium pay or special duty pay.
Packet Page 521 of 532
AM-5185 12.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted For:Jerry Shuster Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum Update.
Recommendation
No action is required.
Previous Council Action
On July 1, 2008, and September 7, 2011, Council approved an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) and appointed
a City representative to the Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum. Both of these ILAs were
one year agreements.
On January 23, 2012, Council approved a version of the current ILA. That version did not include the
City’s $10,000 contribution towards the Forum’s Federal Lobbying efforts.
On April 3, 2012, Council approved a modified version of the ILA that included the City’s $10,000
contribution towards the Forum’s Federal Lobbying efforts.
On October 9, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee reviewed this item and
recommended it be presented to full Council.
Narrative
The City of Edmonds is a member jurisdiction in the Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum
(The Forum). The Forum formed in 2008 to address long-term watershed planning and conservation
issues. The Forum is Co-Chaired by Mayor Jerry Smith of the City of Mountlake Terrace and
Councilmember Don Fiene of the City of Lake Forest Park. The City of Edmonds provides financial
support to the Forum via staff time and payment to Federal lobbyist, Forum administrative support
provided by the City of Mountlake Terrace, and to an ongoing capital project to replace the culverts on
McAleer Creek. This is an update on the Forum’s action for the first three quarters of 2012 and the
planned activities.
The Forum meets on a monthly basis to provide an update to the elected officials of the member
jurisdictions with the progress of ongoing programs and projects in the adopted Capital Improvement
Plan. The meetings also include updates on Federal and state legislative efforts to secure funds to
implement capital projects.
To date the Forum has accomplished the following in 2012:
Packet Page 522 of 532
Renewed a contract with the Johnston Group for Federal lobbying support.
Tracked the McAleer Creek Culvert Replacement Project. This project, being implemented jointly
by the Cities of Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace, will replace three culverts on Caller Creek (the
sole outlet of Lake Ballinger) with one larger fish friendly-passable culvert and two pedestrian
bridges. The object of this project is to allow more water out of the Lake at high stage to reduce the
frequency and severity of flooding of Edmonds’ properties on the Lake (project located in the City
of Mountlake Terrace).
The project is currently nearing the 90% design stage with a Shoreline Substantial Development
permit and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process nearing completion. Construction is
planned for spring and summer 2013.
Working with the Johnston Group, a request was developed and sent to our congressional
delegation for inclusion in the pending Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill. This
request was for projects in the CIP that would reduce flooding of homes both in the upper and
lower watershed.
Attended a presentation by University of Washington graduate students who completed a project in
the watershed, with the City of Mountlake Terrace, to provide more accurate mapping of the
impervious surface areas and other land use categories that drain to the Lake. This information will
be used in the near future to improve the watershed model.
Toured the watershed and explained the issues to staff members from the following offices :
o Senator Maria Cantwell
o Congressmen Jim Mc Dermott
o Congressmen Rick Larsen
o 1st Congressional District (formerly Jay Inslee’s office)
The Johnston Group reported on the results of meeting in Washington D.C. between Forum staff
members from the following offices:
o Senator Patty Murray
o Senator Maria Cantwell
o 1st Congressional District (formerly Jay Inslee’s office)
o Congressmen Jim Mc Dermott
o Congressmen Rick Larsen
o Congresswomen Jaime Herrera Beutler
o Governor Christine Gregoire
The Johnston Group details the following from the D.C. visit:
o The Forum’s congressional delegation is very supportive of the Forum and its goals and seeks to
partner for future capital funding
o The strong collaboration between the Forum members themselves continues to be a strong
foundation for support within our congressional delegation.
o Many members of the delegation believe that Congress will not continue with the earmark ban in
2013 and if so, there may be opportunities for federal funding to come to the forum via
appropriations bills instead of the WRDA bill.
Edmonds’ resident requested an “early warning system” be implemented to notify residents of
rising lake levels so they may take appropriate actions. The Cities of Edmonds and Mountlake
Terrace are working together to implement a system.
Wrote a letter to the State for including in the Governor’s capital budget for 2013 requesting
$750,000 to fund a program from Low Impact Development stormwater retrofits in the watershed.
This project, part of CIP, will reduce the quantity and increase the quality of stormwater flows to
the Lake.
Upcoming Forum activities include:
o Revising the now three year old CIP and updating the priority project list
o Upgrading the existing watershed model with better land use information and actual measured
stream flow data to better predict lake levels. This upgraded model will be used to design alternate
Packet Page 523 of 532
stream flow data to better predict lake levels. This upgraded model will be used to design alternate
weir configurations at the lake’s outlet that could provide a higher level of level protection to the
Edmonds residents.
Financial Impact:
To date, the City of Edmonds has spent approximately $35,000 in 2012 on Lake Ballinger-related projects
and programs. Approximately 2/3 of this cost has been for the design of the McAleer Creek Culvert
replacement project. The other 1/3 is for staff time, lobbyist, and Forum administrative support. The
Stormwater Utility Capital Fund has $102,000 in the 2012 budget from Lake Ballinger-related projects.
Future expenses include another $23,000 for the design of the McAleer Creek Culvert replacement
project, $7,500 for lobbying support, and expenses for staff time, Forum administrative support, and
watershed model upgrading. The total expense for 2012 will be below the budgeted value.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 10/10/2012 03:22 PM
Public Works Kody McConnell 10/11/2012 03:52 PM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 10/11/2012 03:55 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 07:10 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 08:00 AM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 10/10/2012 12:04 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 524 of 532
AM-5193 13.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:10/16/2012
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of October 9, 2012.
Recommendation
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached are copies of the following minutes for the October 9, 2012 City Council Committee Meetings:
10-9-12 Finance Committee
10-9-12 Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee
10-9-12 Public Safety & Pesonnel Committee
Attachments
10-09-12 Finance Committee Minutes
10-09-12 Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee
10-09-12 Public Safety & Personnel Committee Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Dave Earling 10/12/2012 09:51 AM
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 10/12/2012 09:54 AM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 10/11/2012 02:23 PM
Final Approval Date: 10/12/2012
Packet Page 525 of 532
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
October 9, 2012
Councilmembers Present Staff Present
Councilmember Buckshnis Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
Councilmember Yamamoto Rob Chave, Development Services Director (Acting)
Public Present Carl Nelson, CIO
Ron Wambolt
Bruce Witenberg
Councilmember Buckshnis called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. Mr. Hunstock requested the
committee modify the agenda to add an issue related to an agreement between the City and Black Rock
Cable, Inc. for fiber services. The agenda modification was approved and the item was inserted as new
item #B.
A. Historic Preservation Commission 2013 Calendar/Fundraising/Account
Mr. Chave explained the new account being proposed will help facilitate fundraising efforts of the Historic
Preservation Commission. One of the fundraising mechanisms is the sale of an annual calendar that is
coming up soon. Councilmember Buckshnis asked that the next calendar start with Sunday as the first
day of the week. Mr. Chave indicated he previously expressed that desire to the Commission, and he will
work with them to insure the change happens for the 2013 calendar.
Action: Schedule for full Council next week.
B. Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) Agreement between the City and Black Rock Cable, Inc.
Mr. Nelson explained the item was not originally included in the agenda packet because we just today
received revisions back from the City’s legal counsel. The IRU Agreement relates to the City’s fiber
connection from Edmonds to the County’s Data Center. That fiber run, among other things, provides the
infrastructure for video arraignment at the Court as well as connection to SnoCom 911 dispatch. The
agreement is for 30 years at a cost of $57,750. Mr. Nelson indicated time is of the essence with this item
due to the impending sale of Black Rock Cable, Inc. to Wave Division Holdings. It is likely the cost of
such an arrangement will go up after the sale. Also, the current cost of $57,750 is less than what we
would otherwise have to pay on a monthly basis for this service over 30 years at an estimated total cost
of $174,000.
Funding for this item will be included in a subsequent budget amendment prior to the end of 2012.
Action: Schedule for full Council next week.
C. 2013 Property Tax Levy
Mr. Hunstock indicated this item is the annual ordinance setting the property tax levy for the following
year. Due to assessed valuation for real estate in Edmonds that continues to decline, the City’s regular
property tax levy rate would go up from the current $1.66 to an estimated $1.76. The increase in levy rate
is necessary in order to capture the 1% increase in revenue the City is allowed to collect. Mr. Hunstock
noted the levy rate and assessed value could change between now and when Council is asked to adopt
the ordinance due to changes still being made by the County Assessor’s Office.
Mr. Hunstock also noted that due to the decline in assessed values, the amount collected for the EMS
levy will decline because it is capped at $0.50. This decline in revenue to be collected from the EMS levy
more than offsets the allowable 1% increase on the City’s regular levy, resulting in an overall decline in
total property tax revenue for 2013, not including the voted bond levy for the public safety complex.
Packet Page 526 of 532
10-09-12 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Action: Schedule for Public Hearing and consideration by full Council on November 5, 2012.
D. October 2012 Budget Amendment
Mr. Hunstock and Mr. Chave responded to questions related to position changes within their respective
departments. Funding for those position changes will be from reallocated resources within the
departments. The Council is not being asked for additional money related to the changes. These two
changes, as well as the addition of the HR Analyst classification, are being added to the position listing
that is part of the originally adopted budget document. Mr. Hunstock explained the Council approved
funding for the HR Analyst position as part of the April 2012 budget amendment, but the position listing
was not updated at that time and staff is now correcting that oversight.
Mr. Hunstock explained another item included in the budget amendment relates to changes being
required by the State Auditors Office of every City related to their chart of accounts. The State Auditors
Office is changing many of the codes used for how City’s account for revenue and expenses. These
changes are effective 1/1/13. The amount requested is for programming that will be necessary by the
City’s accounting system software provider, EDEN Financial Systems, to make the required changes.
Mr. Nelson responded to questions related to two fiber related items. Those items will help connect
different parts of the City to the fiber network, thereby offsetting fees that are paid to other businesses, as
well as expand the ability to lease excess capacity to Edmonds businesses.
Mr. Hunstock explained the final three items included in the budget amendment relate to 1) conversion of
fleet vehicles to propane, the agreement for which Council previously approved, 2) closure of the
Criminal Investigations Fund and transfer of the $2,500 currently in that fund to the Drug Enforcement
Fund, and 3) minor corrections to a previously submitted budget amendment as it related to interest
costs on refunded utility bonds.
Action: Schedule for full Council next week.
E. August 2012 Monthly Financial Report
Mr. Hunstock explained the General Fund is currently slightly overspent. That situation relates to contract
payments that are made to Fire District #1 in advance of the quarter, as well as some other costs that are
annual expenses but relate to the entire year like liability, property and equipment insurance. Mr.
Hunstock noted no funds were currently overspent, and no departments were overspent in the General
Fund.
Council member Buckshnis requested that large changes in the graphs be footnoted with an explanation.
Mr. Hunstock indicated that and other changes would be included in future versions of the monthly and
quarterly financial reports.
Action: Schedule for Consent Agenda.
F. Public Comments
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, was concerned about a 30 year fiber lease given the company the City will be
dealing with will be sold soon. Mr. Nelson indicated the City has commitments from Wave to honor and
continue the agreements entered into by Black Rock. Mr. Wambolt mentioned the City also receives
increases in its property tax levy for the value of new construction. Mr. Wambolt also indicated he was
concerned about the length of time it is taking for the development agreement topic to return to Council
from when it was originally proposed in the summer of 2011.
Packet Page 527 of 532
10-09-12 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
Bruce Witenberg, Edmonds, also expressed concern with the length of time it is taking for development
agreements to be considered by the Council.
Adjournment – The meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m.
Packet Page 528 of 532
D R A F T M I N U T E S
Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee Meeting
October 9, 2012
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Council Member Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Chair Rob English, City Engineer
Council Member Lora Petso Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services and
Economic Development Director
Rob Chave, Acting Development Services Director
The committee convened at 6:00p.m.
A. Discussion regarding design guidelines, height limits, and coverage requirements for
buildings along Edmonds Way.
The committee discussed current development in the Edmonds Way corridor, notably the relatively
recent zoning for BC-EW and RM-EW. It was noted that these zones resulted from privately
sponsored code and zoning changes, and have been applied in only a couple of locations. They do
have some very unique aspects that vary from other city zones. Committee members also discussed
their impressions of buildings in various locations in the corridor.
B. Quarterly Public Works Project Report
Mr. English highlighted the projects that were in construction or nearing completion during the
third quarter of 2012.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for information.
C. Report on final construction costs for North Talbot Drainage Improvement Project and
acceptance of project.
Mr. English informed the Committee of the final construction cost and that the project was
complete and ready for City Council acceptance.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval.
D. Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement No. 1 with Perteet for overlay and raised
median on the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement Project
Mr. English reviewed the scope of work and fee for Supplement No. 1. A large percentage of the
extra services are needed to design the pavement overlay on 228th St. from 80th Ave W to 1,000
feet east of 72nd Ave W and on 76th Ave W from 228th St. SW to SR99.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval.
Packet Page 529 of 532
Public Works, Parks and Planning Committee Minutes
October 9, 2012
Page 2
2
E. Accept a stormwater pipe and associated appurtenances installed by a resident at 23005-
108th Ave W and an associated easement.
Mr. Williams discussed the easement and conveyance of stormwater facilities to the City on the
property located at 23005 108th Ave W.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval.
F. Stormwater Billing Exemption Reconsideration.
Mr. Williams outlined the reasons why the stormwater fee exemption should be revoked for the
property at 24017 104th Ave W. He also let the committee know that staff will work to develop a
policy for granting fee waivers based on clearly defined criteria.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval.
G. Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplement #4 with David Evans & Associates for
additional utility work on Five Corners Roundabout.
Mr. English explained that the professional services in Supplement #4 are needed to coordinate
the conversion of overhead utilities to underground within the Five Corners Roundabout project.
ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval.
H. Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum Update
Mr. Williams reviewed the recent progress made by the Forum in the third quarter of 2012 and
he informed the committee that design work is underway to replace the McAleer Creek Culverts.
The culvert replacement project is anticipated to begin in 2013.
ACTION: Recommend Staff presentation to the City Council.
F. Public Comments
Mr. Rubenkonig spoke on the building design standards for Edmonds Way.
Mr. Hertrich expressed his concerns about future traffic volumes on Edmonds Way and the need
to have a pavement survey of City streets.
The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Packet Page 530 of 532
PUBLIC SAFETY AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
October 9, 2012
Committee members present: Councilmember Joan Bloom
Councilmember Kristianna Johnson
Others present: Jim Lawless, Assistant Chief of Police
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Citizen Ken Reidy
Citizen Bruce Witenberg
Council Member Joan Bloom called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m.
A. Amendments to sections of ECC 5.05 relating to Potentially Dangerous Dog definitions,
declarations, and appeals.
The meeting began with ACOP Lawless providing background as to the need for the language changes to
ECC 5.05 resulting from the recent ruling by Judge Fair. There were general questions posed by both
Councilmembers Bloom and Johnson relating to Potentially Dangerous and Dangerous Dog declarations.
ACOP Lawless also advised that RCW 16.08 had never been codified by the city, and it was unknown when,
how, or by whom that oversight had occurred. Codification is necessary so that portions of ECC 5.05 are in
compliance with state law and can in turn be cited into Edmonds Municipal Court under ECC 5.05.
Action: Forward to City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve.
B. Discussion on City Council Meeting Procedures.
Councilmember Bloom reported that she and Councilmember Johnson met to discuss how to proceed with the
review of City Council Meeting procedures. She stated that they made a determination to identify the issues /
procedures that need to be defined and addressed.
Councilmember Johnson suggested the committee study the issues; however, she would like to see this topic
discussed at a retreat or a work session as the consensus of the City Council is needed.
The following issues were identified:
• Council President’s authority in terms of setting the City Council Meeting Agenda and also the Agenda
for Committee Meetings.
• Determine if Robert’s Rules of Order, parliamentary procedures, or other rules will be used for
meetings.
• Identify when a Councilmember can participate in the meeting via speaker phone; under what
circumstances and what the criteria are in order to do this.
• Abstaining from a vote.
• Absences; it was noted this issue is addressed in City Code and State law; however, it needs to be
clarified by the City Attorney and written into the Council procedures.
• Appointments to committees and boards; clearly indicate how appointments are handled; it is currently
not consistent.
• Written citizen comments being read into the record; clarify procedure; it needs to be consistent, fair
and equal to all citizens.
• Work Sessions; clarify if the City Council should be voting during work sessions.
Packet Page 531 of 532
Public Safety/Personnel Committee
October 9, 2012
Page 2
• Written rules and procedures for how to conduct executive sessions.
• Committee Meetings – clarify how the agenda is set; procedure for conducting committee meetings;
determine who takes minutes.
• Clarify procedures related to resolutions and ordinances.
C. Public Comments
Ken Reidy commented on the difficulty for the public’s voice to be heard. He stated it is critical that the city
codes and procedures must be clear and consistently applied. The codes and procedures related to council
meetings and committee meetings are limiting the public’s ability to be heard. He referred to a public hearing
held on September 16, 2008 related to the vacation of an unopened 7-1/2 foot wide alley. The public notice
made no mention of the possibility that a Temporary Construction Easement on his property would be
considered as part of the alley easement vacation. He described the effects of that easement and the impact
on him and his family noting that his voice went unheard. He described his efforts to have the matter
reconsidered. He provided another example of elected officials not making sure citizens are heard with regard
to the recent vote on the issue of Executive Sessions. (Mr. Reidy submitted a complete copy of his comments
for the record and they are on file in the City Clerk’s Office.)
Councilmembers Bloom and Johnson identified additional issues related to Council Procedures:
• Define the procedure for when a citizen asks questions at a Council Meeting.
• Define how a public hearing is handled at meetings.
• Procedure for communicating via email between Council members.
Bruce Witenberg joined the meeting at 7:15 p.m. and was provided an opportunity to comment. Mr. Witenberg
commented that from his observation there are a lot of processes that seem to have been adopted over the
years that may not necessarily be codified; it is the way people understand that business is being done. He
further commented that if the Committee has the time, drafting procedures in some form is probably a good
thing. He noted it will be extremely time consuming and the committee will need to determine where it fits in
the priority of other issues facing the city.
The Committee requested that this agenda item be scheduled on the November Committee Agenda.
The meeting adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
Packet Page 532 of 532