02/23/1999 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
FEBRUARY 239 1999
Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. to interview a candidate for the Library Board, the Edmonds
City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Barbara Fahey in the Library Plaza
Room, 650 Main Street. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Barbara Fahey, Mayor
Gary Haakenson, Council President
Dave Earling, Councilmember
John Nordquist, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember (arrived 7:05 pm)
Jim White, Councilmember
Dick Van Hollebeke, Councilmember
Thomas A. Miller, Councilmember
1. , APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STAFF PRESENT
Ray Miller, Development Services Director
Peggy Hetzler, Administrative Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Noel Miller, Public Works Superintendent
James Walker, City Engineer
Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Director
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Council President Haakelson requested "Acceptance of Underground Utility Easement from the Port of
Edmonds" be added to the Consent Agenda as Item J. He suggested the Council briefly review this item
to determine if there were any concerns.
Council President Haakenson requested Item 4 (Presentation of Award of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting) be removed from the agenda and postponed until Accounting Manager Doug
Farmen could be present.
COUNCILMEMBER MILLER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST,
FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS AMENDED.
Councilmember Earling asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the Underground Utility Easement from
the Port of Edmonds. City Clerk Sandy Chase said the City Attorney approved it as to form.
MOTION CARRIED. (Councilmember Plunkett was not present for the vote.)
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION
CARRIED. (Councilmember Plunkett was not present for the vote.) The agenda items approved are
as follows:
(A) ROLL CALL
pprove 16/99 (B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 1999
inutes
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 1
n
A
(C)
APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #29329 THROUGH #30934 FOR THE WEEK OF
FEBRUARY 16, 1999, IN THE AMOUNT OF $343,925.51. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL
WARRANTS #23380 THROUGH #23500 FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY I THOROUGH
FEBRUARY 15, 1999, IN THE AMOUNT OF $440,242.77
ost Tennis
(D)
REPORT ON FINAL COrOSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE YOST TENNIS COURT SITE
ourt Site
PREPARATION AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
reparation
(E)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH FCSG
ontract w/
CSG ,
TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STUDIES FOR THE SANITARY SEWER AND
Ftility Rates
STORMWATER UTILITY RATES
PSA for '
(F)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
re
AGREEMENT WITH PROPERTY COUNSELORS TO PROVIDE APPRAISAL
Ppprais,
arking Gar.
SERVICES FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE
gmt for
(G)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Perrinville
WITH CHS ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PERRINVILLE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
ID Design
DISTRICT (LID) SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN PROJECT
ewer Meter
(H)
AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER METER
[Station A
ehab. Pro'.
STATION A REHABILITATION DESIGN PROJECT WITH CHS ENGINEERS, INC.
jlslorth End
axi
(I)
APPROVAL OF 1999 TAXI LICENSE FOR TAC -KEY INC., DBA NORTH END TAXI
Port- Utility
(J)
ACCEPTANCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT FROM THE PORT OF
cement
EDMONDS
3.
CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
Library B Mayor Fahey stated that the Council interviewed Irene Leonard, a candidate for the vacant position on
[Appointment the Library Board, prior to tonight's meeting. Mayor Fahey explained Ms. Leonard is an attorney, is
interested in working with the library, and has been a member of the Friends of the Library for several
years.
COUNCILMEMBER EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, TO
APPOINT IRENE LEONARD TO THE VACANT POSITION ON THE LIBRARY BOARD.
MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Fahey recognized Library Board Member Beverly Kaufman in the audience. Mayor Fahey
introduced Ms. Leonard and congratulated her on her appointment.
4. PRESENTATION OF AWARD OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL
REPORTING
This item was postponed until Accounting Manager Doug Farmen could be present for the presentation.
5. WORK SESSION - ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
ccessory Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board has been working on this issue for some
welling time. When the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1995, one of the hallmarks of the plan was to
"ts encourage and promote single family ownership and development in the City. When this was followed -
up with consideration of affordable housing, one of the items highlighted was a feeling that the existing
Accessory Dwelling Unit provisions in the Code were difficult to adhere to. For this reason, the City
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 2
sees few applications for accessory dwelling units but staff believes there are many in place that are not
permitted. The City usually only learns of an accessory dwelling unit via complaints.
Mr. Chave stated that when the Planning Board considered the issue, a number of problems with the
current language were identified such as a permitted accessory dwelling unit could not exist once a house
was sold because the new owners must wait two years to apply for an accessory dwelling unit. Other
difficulties with the existing accessory dwelling unit provisions are outlined in the summary memo in the
Council's packet as well as in the Planning Board minutes. The Planning Board felt accessory dwelling
units were acceptable as long as they were attached to and made a part of the single - family structure.
Further, the Planning Board wanted to ensure it was clear in the definitions that an accessory dwelling
unit did not change the definition of a single family parcel (the overall density was not changed and only
a single family could reside on the property). Mr. Chave noted the definition of single family did not
mean related individuals, it could be up to five unrelated adults. He stressed the definition of single
family would still be applied to the single family home and the accessory dwelling unit. The Planning
Board felt strongly this was not to be interpreted that duplexes were allowed in single family
neighborhoods.
Mr. Chave said one of the most difficult issues the Planning Board considered was detached accessory
dwelling units. Under the current regulations, a detached accessory dwelling units (i.e. over a garage) is
not allowed. In the proposed regulations, a detached accessory dwelling unit could be permitted via a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process (which includes a public hearing).
Mr. Chave explained under the current regulations, any accessory dwelling unit requires a CUP. The
regulations would require only public notice following an application for an accessory dwelling unit and
the decision would be made by staff. He said it is presumed if an attached accessory dwelling unit meets
the guidelines and the size restrictions, only a staff review and approval process are required. He
explained the notice provides neighbors an opportunity to comment and to challenge the staff decision,
triggering a public hearing process. He reiterated a CUP (and accompanying public hearing process) is
required for a detached unit. The reason a CUP is required for a detached accessory dwelling unit is to
ensure a unit that is separate from the main structure is closely scrutinized. He reiterated the purpose of
the change regarding accessory dwelling units is not to encourage multifamily housing in single family
neighborhoods but to allow flexibility in housing types while retaining single family character.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked if the City had an inventory of existing accessory dwelling units.
Mr. Chave answered no because many that are in existence are not permitted. He said staff usually
becomes aware of accessory dwelling units via complaints (one or two complaints per year are usually
received).
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked how residents would be notified of the change and how they
would be requested to apply for a CUP. Mr. Chave answered a mailing would be done, perhaps with the
utility billing. He explained the proposed ordinance requires residents with an accessory dwelling unit to
submit an application within one year of adoption of the ordinance. He anticipated the first notice
regarding accessory dwelling units.would be followed up in six months with another notice to encourage
residents to have accessory dwelling units permitted without penalty.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke referred to paragraph F on page 5 of the ordinance that requires owners
to be in residence for 180 days. He questioned the sentence that.states, "The owner(s) shall not rent any
portion of the owner - occupied residence either during the owner(s) occupancy or while the owner is
absent from the owner- occupied unit for any period." Mr. Chave answered this referred to the owner-
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 3
occupied portion of the residence. For example if the owner lives elsewhere during a portion of the year,
they were not permitted to rent the owner- occupied portion of the residence.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked if this provision would permit "residence trading" for citizens who
trade residences when traveling to other countries. Mr. Chave was uncertain, but said a trade likely
would not constitute "rent."
Councilmember Nordquist pointed out that "occupied" was difficult to define. He said a situation
occurred in their neighborhood where the owner was living elsewhere but because his furniture remained
in the residence, the interpretation was the furniture "occupied" the residence. Mr. Chave said the
common dictionary definition of occupied is that one's residence must be there for over six months.
Councilmember Earling pointed out the size limitation for an attached accessory dwelling unit in the
ordinance was 800 square feet on page 4 of the ordinance and 900 square feet for a detached accessory
dwelling unit on page 6. Mr. Chave agreed this needed to be changed to be consistent at 800 square feet.
Councilmember Earling observed the Planning Board felt these revisions would assist the City in
meeting the goals under the GMA (6,000 additional residents) and perhaps establish more affordable
housing. He asked the City's status in meeting these projections, commenting the Snohomish County
Executive mentioned Edmonds is falling short of the projected timeline. Mr. Chave answered if it was
assumed an equal number of people were being added each year over the 20 years the 6,000 additional
residents were to be accommodated, it could be said the City was behind. However, this is subject to
many factors. Councilmember Earling requested staff provide this information to the Council. He
commented if the City was falling behind, it would be a reason for considering this issue in a different
light. Mr. Chave said accessory dwelling units were thought to be a good option to accept additional
density without rezoning for multifamily.
Councilmember Earling asked if there was information available from other cities who have made
similar changes in their accessory dwelling unit regulations, such as whether the number of accessory
dwelling units increased following the change. Mr. Chave offered to provide information from other
jurisdictions that have made changes to their accessory dwelling units regulations.
Councilmember Earling asked Mr. Chave to review the notification and public process for both attached
and detached accessory dwelling units. Mr. Chave explained for an attached accessory dwelling unit, a
permit is required. Notice of a development application is required and staff issues a decision. After
staff s decision is issued, the public has 10 working days to file an appeal. The appeal would trigger an
open record hearing (an open hearing because no previous public hearing would have been held). For a
detached accessory dwelling unit, the ordinance requires that an applicant obtain a CUP. The CUP
triggers the public hearing process; therefore, the public notice would include the hearing date for the
permit. The decision on the CUP can also be appealed, but it would be a closed record appeal before the
Council. Councilmember Earling observed the public has an opportunity to respond in both instances.
Councilmember Miller referred to Section 21.21.020 Density Limitations, which indicates family .
members and caregivers were the only allowable occupants of an accessory dwelling unit. After reading
the Planning Board minutes, his perception of density was the number of accessory dwelling units
allowed per square mile. He said this issue was not resolved by the Planning Board. Mr. Chave
answered the Planning Board discussed a provision in another city's regulations that places a cap on the
number of accessory dwelling units in an area; if the number of units permitted exceeded that cap, it
triggered a moratorium, studies, etc. The Planning Board discussed this issue and determined they
needed to be shown. accessory dwelling units would be a problem before establishing a cap, particularly
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 4
with no knowledge of what the cap should be. In lieu of a cap, the Planning Board included Section 3 of
the ordinance which states, "The Planning Board is hereby requested and directed to review the
provisions of Chapter 20.21 and make its report on the impact and effects of the ordinance and provide
its recommendations" to the Council within a year.
Councilmember Miller inquired about someone constructing and renting out an accessory dwelling unit
in violation of the regulations. Mr. Chave said if the accessory dwelling unit that was constructed was
too large, the property owner may be required to remove it. If a complaint is filed, the property owner
must pay a double fee (per the provision in the Planning Fee Ordinance that requires a double fee for
action taken without permits). He noted if a complaint is filed, it is likely a hearing will be required. He
said the proposed accessory dwelling unit regulations would make it easier to obtain approval for an
accessory dwelling unit which hopefully will encourage residents to apply for and obtain the necessary
permits.
Councilmember Miller asked if an accessory dwelling unit could be constructed creating a zero lot line.
Mr. Chave answered the proposed regulations would not change the setback requirements.
Councilmember Miller asked how the City would be aware of a resident who rented the owner - occupied
portion of the residence to a non - family member or non -care giver. Mr. Chave said an affidavit is
required; however, the City has no way of ensuring that the property owner remains in the owner -
occupied portion of the home. He assumed if the primary residence was rented, the neighbors would be
aware and complain. He said the public notice would inform the neighborhood of the conditions under
which an accessory dwelling unit is allowed. If the accessory dwelling unit situation changes, a neighbor
would be more likely to complain than if they did not know it existed.
Councilmember Earling observed problems might occur when a property with an accessory dwelling unit
is sold because, although the original owner- occupant was aware of the conditions under which the
accessory dwelling unit was established, the second owner may not be inclined to operate it in the same
manner. This may result in the _owner- occupant not residing in the home, creating a duplex -type
arrangement. He asked if staff had considered this. Mr. Chave explained a covenant is required to be
filed (page 3 of the ordinance), informing future property owners of the conditions for the use of the
accessory dwelling unit. He said this is the reason the Planning Board discussed whether the accessory
dwelling unit should remain with the land or ownership. The Planning Board concluded the impact of
the accessory dwelling unit would be the same regardless of who owns the property; therefore, a transfer
of ownership should not be a penalty.
Councilmember Earling recalled other areas of the City have restrictions that owners agree to upon a
purchase but later question whether the City should enforce the restrictions., He said the restrictions
might not be fully understood by the purchasers of a property. Mr. Chave agreed this was a legitimate
issue and said this was the basis for the discussion of whether the accessory dwelling unit permit
remained with the land or the owner of the property.
Councilmember White said the word "occupied" appears 16 times in paragraph F on page 5 of the
ordinance. He was not certain the definition of 'occupied" was clear and recommended it be defined in
the ordinance or replaced with "physically residing in the dwelling." Councilmember White also
recommended "disabled" be defined. Mr. Chave said in preparation for the public hearing staff will
work with the City Attorney to define "occupied" and "disabled."
Council President Haakenson inquired about the time frame for setting the public hearing. Mr. Chave
answered the public hearing would be scheduled as soon as the City Clerk was able to advertise it.. If the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 5
intent was to supplement the public hearing notice via notice in the utility billing, Council President
Haakenson suggested both billing cycles be utilized.
Mayor Fahey referred to Section F on page 5 of the ordinance and questioned the reference to
accommodating disabled people. She said when disabled people are accommodated in a single family
residential home, a detached accessory dwelling unit, etc., that would constitute a group home and the
City could not place restrictions on it. The ordinance addresses the possibility of a disabled person living
in the primary residence and a caregiver living in an accessory dwelling unit, which caused Mayor Fahey
to question whether this opened the possibility of an extension of what is already occurring in group
homes (i.e. creating a group home and allowing a caregiver to live in an accessory dwelling unit or visa
versa). Mr. Chave answered the group . home is viewed as an extension/enlargement of the accessory
dwelling unit concept. The accessory dwelling unit regulations are smaller and more closely defined.
Mayor Fahey questioned whether the City could differentiate between a method to accommodate people
with disabilities via an accessory dwelling unit and a group home in which the City cannot restrict the
number of residents. Mr. Chave answered a group home would still be governed by existing regulations.
The intent of the accessory dwelling unit regulations is to provide additional flexibility for the typical
single family home. He said the City Attorney indicates once a group home is established, it is not an
accessory dwelling unit. Mayor Fahey agreed but said at this time a group home is not permitted to have
an accessory dwelling unit for a caregiver but these regulations appear to "open the door" to that
possibility. Mr. Chave said he would discuss this with the City Attorney.
6. MAYOR'S REPORT
century Mayor Fahey invited interested individuals or groups -to attend the first planning meeting for a 2151
]coming Century Welcoming Event on March 1 at 7 :00 - 9:00 in the Library Plaza Room. She explained the
°t celebration may include multiple events throughout the City culminating in one celebration at midnight.
Community Mayor Fahey,I invited citizens to participate in the community visioning session, facilitated by
Visioning HyettPalma that will be held on March 24 at 7:00 - 8:30 p.m. at the Edmonds Theater. She encouraged
Session . citizens to participate in the planning and visioning process for the City. She explained specific
questions that residents will be asked to respond to will be made available via fliers, the newspaper, the
City's Web Site, etc.
wC Legis. Mayor Fahey announced the Association of Washington Cities, the organization that represents all cities
Meetings in Washington and keeps them informed of issues that concern cities including issues under
consideration by the Legislature, is holding meetings on Wednesday and Thursday, February 24 and 25
that she and Councilmember Nordquist plan to attend. She said this is an opportunity for City officials to
understand the implications of legislation that is being proposed.
Friends of Mayor Fahey read from the Friends of the Library newsletter expressing the staff of the Edmonds
e Library. Library's appreciation for the Friends of the Library's generous donation of $6,696.61 which enabled the
onation
library to purchase a high/low reference desk that allows the library to better serve its patrons,
particularly with all the new technology and databases Sno Isle is providing. Mayor Fahey said this is an
example of the wonderful services the Friends of the Library provide and the benefits the library
receives. Mayor Fahey thanked the members of the Friends of the Library for their efforts as well as for
this new addition to the library.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 6
7. INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL REPORTS/UPDATES ON RESPECTIVE BOARD MEETINGS
ouncit Council President Haakenson thanked Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman for her efforts ,
,treat at the City Council retreat. He also thanked staff for their presentations at the retreat; particularly the
discussion on revenue forecasting and fire issues. He thanked the Councilmembers for'their thoughtful
questions and said he felt the retreat was very instructional and worthwhile.
ouncil Councilmember Nordquist thanked Council President Haakenson, Senior Executive Council Assistant
etreat Jana Spellman, Mayor Fahey, and staff for their efforts at the retreat. He said the retreat was very
interesting and productive. As the City's representative on the Snohomish County Health District, he
Eard alth reported the Health Board continues to be involved in tobacco issues. Another major issue for the Health
saict District is the reoccurrence of TB in the community. This is a challenging issue that the Health District
is monitoring carefully. He said open markets are also requiring modifications in regulations to
accommodate them. He said the Health District is holding a 2 -day meeting next month with other Health
Districts throughout the state. A 2 -day seminar will also be held in March with the Health District Board
and staff.
nvestrnent Councilmember Miller asked Administrative Services Director Peggy Hetzler to provide a report and
rograrn discussion to the Finance Committee regarding cash and the investment program in the City. He was
particularly interested in Fund 811 and 812.
ouna Councilmember Earling said the Sound Transit plan is receiving scrutiny regarding alignment of the light
.sit Plan rail line. He anticipated these issues could be resolved and the preferred alignment approved at the
Sound Transit Board meeting on Thursday, February 25. He said there are issues /requests, which would
add $900 million to the plan. He reported Community Transit will receive an award on Sunday,
February 28 during Puget Sound Regional Council's annual recognition of significant projects. in the
Puget Sound basin for service CT provides on the Tulalip Indian Reservation. He said Vice President
Gore will attend the presentation.
;sioning_ Councilmember Van Hollebeke said the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development is very pleased
Process the visioning process is moving forward and he encouraged citizens to watch for articles in The Edmonds
Paper and the Enterprise regarding the process and ways citizens can participate. He urged citizens to
attend the March 24 meeting at the Edmonds Theater.
onth Councilmember Plunkett, Council liaison to the Port of Edmonds, explained the City's lease of the South
arina Marina Beach Park on a year -to -year basis creates some anxiety regarding how long the property will be
each Park retained as a park. The City is discussing a memorandum of understanding with the Port of Edmonds
that would require the land to remain pristine and as a beach, regardless of who owned the property. The
Port and Unocal are discussing possibilities for a purchase of that property. He stressed the Port
Commissioners have not made a decision regarding the purchase and no funding has been identified. He
said Parks and Recreation Director Arvilla Ohlde, Mayor Fahey, and Council President Haakenson have
been discussing this issue with the Port of Edmonds and will represent the City's interest regarding the
property.
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
BARBARA S. FAHEY, MAYOR SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
February 23, 1999
Page 7
1
fl
1,
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Plaza Meeting Room - Library Building
650 Main Street
7:00 -10:00 D.M.
FEBRUARY 23, 1999.
SPECIAL MEETING
6:45 P.M. — INTERVIEW CANDIDATE FOR THE LIBRARY BOARD
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
1.
2.
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(1)
3. (5 Min.)
4. (5 Min.)
5. (30 Min.)
6. (10 Min.)
7. (15 Min.)
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 1999
APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #29329 THROUGH #30934 FOR THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 16, 1999,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $343,925.51. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL WARRANTS #23380 THROUGH #23500 FOR
THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 1 THROUGH FEBRUARY 15, 1999, IN THE AMOUNT OF $440,242.77.
REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE YOST TENNIS COURT SITE PREPARATION AND
COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH FCSG TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL STUDIES FOR THE SANITARY SEWER AND STORMWATER UTILITY RATES
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PROPERTY
COUNSELORS TO PROVIDE APPRAISAL SERVICES FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHS
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PERRINVILLE LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID) SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN PROJECT
AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACT FOR SANITARY SEWER METER STATION A
REHABILITATION DESIGN PROJECT WITH CHS ENGINEERS, INC.
APPROVAL OF 1999 TAXI LICENSE FOR TAC KEY INC., DBA, NORTH END TAXI
CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
PRESENTATION OF AWARD OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
WORK SESSION — ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
MAYOR'S REPORT
INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL REPORTSIUPDATES ON RESPECTIVE BOARD MEETINGS
Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771 -0245 with 24 hours advance
notice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 32. Delayed telecast of this meeting appears
the following Wednesday, Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 32.