05/18/1999 City Councilprove
1/99
mutes
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
MAY 1891999
Following a Special Meeting at 6:40 p.m. for the Council to meet in Executive Session regarding a real
estate matter, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Barbara
Fahey in the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main Street. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Barbara Fahey, Mayor
Gary Haakenson, Council President
Dave Earling, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Jim White, Councilmember
Dick Van Hollebeke, Councilmember
Thomas A. Miller, Councilmember
ABSENT
John Nordquist, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Meghan Cross, Student Representative
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STAFF PRESENT
Kevin Taylor, Acting Fire Chief
John Westfall, Fire Marshal
Ray Miller, Development Services Director
Peggy Hetzler, Administrative Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
James Walker, City Engineer
Kate Galloway, Planner
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO MOVE ITEM 3 TO ITEM 3B AND ADD ITEM 3A, A FIVE -MINUTE
DISCUSSION OF ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY. HE FURTHER MOVED THAT THE
ORDER OF ITEMS 7 AND 8 BE REVERSED. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
HAAKENSON, FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PLUNKETT, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. MOTION
CARRIED. The agenda items approved are as follows:
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 11, 1999
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 1
Approve
(C)
APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #29384 THROUGH #32817 FOR THE WEEK OF
Claim
MAY 10, 1999, IN THE AMOUNT OF $169,249.16
Warrants
Accept
(D)
ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT -OF -WAY FROM THE PLAT OF ESPERANCE COURT
OW
Multimedia
(E)
AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE MULTIMEDIA PROJECTION SYSTEM FROM
Projection
System
WESTEK PRESENTATION SYSTEMS
rite of I
(F)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH GREATER EDMONDS
Edmonds
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE TASTE OF EDMONDS
Festival
(G)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH THE EDMONDS ARTS
ontract ,
FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS FESTIVAL
K' of July
(H)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH GREATER EDMONDS
arade
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY PARADE AND
FIREWORKS DISPLAY
azket (1) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH EDMONDS -SOUTH
umm SNOHOMISH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE EDMONDS SUMMER
MARKET
xs I (J) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Engineers J WITH CHS ENGINEERS, INC. FOR SANITARY SEWER METER STATION, A
REHABILITATION DESIGN PROJECT
Iffiterlocal (K) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH
iNth School
strict SNOHOMISH COUNTY AND EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 FOR THE OLD
i
WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
1999
RNTF (L) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN THE 1999 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
nterlocal FOR SNOHOMISH REGIONAL NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
3a. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY
ire Station Councilmember White explained the recent bond issue included construction of a new fire station.
.te Following investigation and study of where the station should be sited, it was ultimately determined it
should be north of the existing Five Corners site. Through negotiations and discussion with the Fire
Department, the City has acquired an appropriate site.
COUNCILMEMBER WHITE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF THE SITE FOR AN AMOUNT NOT -TO- EXCEED $480,000.
Councilmember White explained the funds for acquisition are within the bond funds voted upon by the
citizens together with interest on those moneys. No additional expenditure from the General Fund is
necessary. He said this is an appropriate site to serve the northern portion of the City and is more
appropriate than the existing site.
MOTION CARRIED.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 2
0
3b. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING BOARD REGARDING
AN APPLICATION FOR A "CONTRACT REZONE" OF AN APPROXIMATELY 8,602 SQUARE
FOOT LOT (.20 ACRES) FROM RS -6 TO RM -3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ADDITIONAL DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. THE.
PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE STIPULATES ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT
RESTRICTIONS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE SUBJECT PROJECT IS LOCATED AT
403 3P-D AVENUE NORTH. (Applicant: Doug Herman / File No. R -98 -207)
ontract Mayor Fahey asked if any Councilmembers wished to make any disclosures. Councihnember Earling
Rezone at advised his firm was the listing agent on behalf of Mr. Herman for the adjacent property 3 -4 years ago
03 and Ave but did not feel this would impact his participation. Mayor Fahey asked if there were any challenges to
the participation of any Councilmember. There were no challenges.
Planner Kate Galloway explained the applicant, Douglas Herman, submitted an application for a contract
rezone for the property located at 403 3' Avenue North. The request is to upzone the property from
single- family residential, one unit per 6,000 square feet, to multi - residential, one unit per 3,000 square
feet, with the intent of constructing one additional single- family dwelling on the site that would be
accessible from the alley. She advised this was reviewed by the Planning Board and a public hearing
was held on April 28, 1999 (Exhibit 5). Following deliberation, the Planning. Board recommended
approval of the rezone on the basis of the conclusions listed in the Planning Advisory Report (pages 2 -7
in Exhibit 2). She said the Planning Board found the rezone was consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan, consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, and although the character of the area has not changed
significantly, the proposal would be consistent with the policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends the Council adopt the Planning Board's recommendation, approve the contract rezone
and direct staff to prepare an ordinance amending the zoning map. She advised a letter was received on
May 13 from Agnes Beresford in opposition to this application.
Ms. Galloway displayed a zoning map and identified the subject property and surrounding uses. She
displayed a copy of the Comprehensive Plan designation, pointing out the multiple residential, high
density designation.
Mayor Fahey asked how a contract rezone affected the building setbacks and height restrictions.
Ms. Galloway answered the current zoning would allow 5 -foot, side setbacks; 20 -foot, front yard
setback; and 15 -foot, rear setback. The multifamily RM -3 zone allows a minimum setback of 15 feet,
sideyard setback of 15 feet, rear setback of 15 feet, maximum height of 25 feet unless a modulated roof
design is proposed, which would allow a maximum of 30 feet. She explained the maximum height in the
existing zone is 25 feet.
Applicant
Douglas Herman, 403 31 Avenue N, Edmonds, clarified setbacks in the RM -3 zone are 5 on the side,
20 on the front and 15 for the rear. He said the RM -1.5 is 15 on the side and 15 on the rear and 25 on the
front. He said the RM -3 zone gets the "benefit" of the RS -6 zone setbacks. He explained he did the
project next door, a few on 3rd Avenue South, and several other houses in the City. He explained if the
existing house was demolished, five houses could be constructed on this site. By using a contract rezone,
the project will look like a detached. duplex; the house in the rear will be new and the house in front will
be remodeled to look similar to the house in the rear so that it looks like one project. The house on the
rear portion is 26%2 feet high, 3d /2 feet shorter than it could be. The house will be accessed from the alley
and will create no more traffic than construction of a double car garage. He suggested the City consider
creating a transition between high density and single family.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 3
Mayor Fahey opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of
the audience who wished to address the Council. Mayor Fahey remanded the matter to Council for
deliberation.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE
PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AND
BRING BACK AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR APPROVAL BY
THE COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED.
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised he would prepare an ordinance as well as a revised contract rezone
due to language changes that are necessary.
4. , PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3248 DECLARING A ZONING
MORATORIUM ON ZONING CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS RELATING TO THE
KEEPING OF ANIMALS
ubl'►c xear- Planning Manager Rob Chave explained Ordinance No. 3248 was adopted on April 20, 1999 and
ing, zoning suspends any enforcement action that may be counter to the new regulations for a six -month period while
orator�um
the Council deliberates the current animal regulations and provisions. A public hearing is required after
the Council adopts an interim zoning measure and no action is required other than taking testimony.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the moratorium suspends current enforcement actions but does not
undo any decisions or staff actions taken in the past. If the Council maintains the same regulations or
enacts stricter regulations, enforcement actions will proceed. If different standards were adopted, those
enforcement actions would cease at that time.
Mayor Fahey opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Henry Krist, 3 Park Place, Edmonds, expressed concern with the moratorium as it appears to have
been put in place at Mr. Petosa's urging due to his raising of chickens and turkeys. The Planning Board
ruled against Mr. Petosa; he appealed their decision and the original decision was upheld. Mr. Krist said
last summer or fall, the problem was not merely with the raising-of fowl, although that has been illegal in
Edmonds since the 1960's, but also the nuisance (odor and noise) this was of concern to one neighbor,
Mr. and Mrs. Nicholson. Mr. Krist said this has been an ongoing problem for 6 -9 months and now will
be delayed further. He agreed with a moratorium on enforcement of the number of domestic animals or
household pets because three may be too few. However, this action appears to be a moratorium on the
decision made against Mr. Petosa due to the nuisance caused by his raising of fowl in his yard. He said
the packet materials indicate the moratorium does not negate nuisances. He objected to another 60 -day
delay.
Al Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, said Animal Control staff should be at the Council
meeting to provide their recommendation. He was concerned the City was doing away with, animal
control regulations and felt all processes in the City should be the same.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Fahey closed the public participation portion of the hearing.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 4
Councilmember White asked Mr. Snyder to repeat his comments that the ordinance does not impact
enforcement of nuisances. Mr. Snyder said it does not impact nuisance, dangerous dog or animal control
provisions. The ordinance suspends enforcement of zoning code actions such as Mr. Petosa's and use of
property for keeping of animals. Councilmember White asked if the enforcement action regarding
Mr. Petosa was. a zoning enforcement. issue or a nuisance issue. Mr. Snyder answered it is a zoning
enforcement issue. When the six months expires, Mr. Petosa will be required to be in compliance with
the new ordinance as written. Councilmember White asked if there has been a determination by a City
official that a nuisance exists. Mr. Snyder answered only zoning violations have been determined.
Mr. Snyder advised he would prepare findings based on the limited testimony provided and staff reports
from the prior action.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED DELIBERATION OF A REQUEST TO VACATE A
PORTION OF THE 180TO STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY ADJACENT TO 8615 OLYMPIC VIEW
DRIVE !Applicant: Lori Greenleaf/Evans /File No. ST -98 -52
Staff displayed a vicinity map that identified the Greenleaf -Evans property and the right -of -way.
os -52 Councilmember Earling advised he would recuse himself as he was not present at the public hearing.
Vacation Council President Haakenson said he was present for the public hearing but -not for the vote on the
motion for reconsideration. Mr. Snyder advised Council President Haakenson would be allowed to
participate as the motion for reconsideration was an interim procedural action.
City Attorney Snyder summarized Ms. Greenleaf - .Evans' reconsideration motion, explaining the issue for
reconsideration is the number of lots that could be created. Ms. Greenleaf -Evans' property currently has
sufficient square footage to subdivide into two lots; the previously approved vacation would add
sufficient square footage to subdivide the property into three lots. However, the Council's decision
specified as part of the consideration for the vacation that development rights for the parcel be waived.
Ms. Greenleaf -Evans is amenable to waiving development rights to the third lot that would be created by
the vacation but wants to retain their existing development right to develop a second lot, subject to
zoning, etc.
Applicant
Lori Greenleaf -Evans explained they plan to build a single- family residence on the property and do not
plan to subdivide the property. That was the reason she was previously amenable to waiving their
development rights. However, the lot to the west has approximately 32,000 square feet and could
subdivide their property into two lots in the future. If the City vacates the remainder of the right -of -way
to the west and east of their property, adjacent properties would be able to subdivide into three lots while
she (Ms. Greenleaf - Evans) has given up their development rights. She preferred there not be three
houses on the adjacent properties and wanted to protect the ability to subdivide their property into two
lots for future generations. She reiterated they plan to build a single - family residence, fairly centralized
on the property.
Council President Haakenson asked Ms. Greenleaf -Evans if she was under the impression when she first
came before the Council that the property was not subdividable into two lots. Ms. Greenleaf -Evans
answered she was told by the Planning Department they could subdivide into two lots based on the RS-
1200 zoning. Following the Council's decision, she realized they had given up all development lots by
acquiring the additional 30 feet of right -of -way. Council President Haakenson observed Ms. Greenleaf -
Evans was agreeable to all the terms established at the public hearing but would like to be able to
subdivide the property into two lots. Ms. Greenleaf -Evans clarified they would like to retain the
Edmonds City.Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 5
development rights they currently have, which allows them to subdivide the property into two parcels in
the future. She was agreeable to waiving the right to the third lot. She asked if there was a method to
prevent the adjacent properties from subdividing into three lots if the remainder of the right -of -way is
vacated.
Council President Haakenson said the Council could address her property but not other properties
Mr. Snyder advised no public comment would be taken as the record was fixed at the prior bearing.
Councilmember White recalled the price established for reasonable appreciation and market value of the
property based on the vacation of 30 feet did not take into account the concept of subdividing the
property. Mr. Snyder answered Ms. Greenleaf -Evans is amenable to waiving development rights created
by the vacation, which lowers the value of the vacation.
Councilmember Miller asked whether limiting the ability to subdivide reduced the value of the vacated
portion. Planning Supervisor Jeff Wilson commented that the value was determined by considering the
assessed valuation rather than an appraisal. In past vacations, value has been determined based on what
the vacation adds to the property, i.e. whether a bigger house could be constructed, whether there was
more flexibility on placement of the home, how the vacation affects views, etc. In this case, an appraisal
has not been done to determine what value may be derived from acquiring the additional property.
Councilmember Miller recalled the land value varied from $0.36 to $6.08 per square foot. Mr. Wilson
answered the $0.36 value was the value per square foot of the subject property (Lot 3). The $6.08 per
square foot is the value of Lot 1 and a third value slightly over $3.00 per square foot was determined
based on another property. Mr. Wilson said there was no consistency between the values per square foot
for property located in the same area.
Councilmember Miller asked if a formal appraisal was necessary to determine the value of the property.
Mr. Wilson said his concern is that there has not been a clear establishment of the value of the vacation
to the property. He said staff agreed to consider the assessed value in this instance because at the
previous hearing the applicant agreed to waive all subdivision possibilities for the property.
Mr. Snyder said the $3,562 valuation was determined by the square footage of the vacated property
based on the low -end figure of the assessed valuation. It does not take into account the value the
vacation adds to the property but Ms. Greenleaf -Evans has offered to waive that. Mr. Snyder agreed if
development rights are included in this matter, the property should be appraised.
Councilmember Plunkett observed Mr. Wilson and Mr. Snyder's opinions differed. Mr. Wilson
explained in recent vacations the benefit derived has been considered when determining the valuation.
He said the benefit is not limited to whether the property can be subdivided but also whether it provides a
larger building pad for a larger house, whether it provides opportunities to locate the house where they
may be able to take advantage of view, etc. Councilmember Plunkett asked if staff recommended an
appraisal be done. Mr. Wilson answered with the ability to subdivide the property, considering the
assessed value per square foot may not be an adequate indicator of the property or additional value that
may be derived from vacation.
Councilmember White asked what criteria should be used to establish a price for this property.
Mr. Snyder answered the Council has a great deal of legislative discretion. Many cities routinely vacate
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May i8,1999
Page 6
unused property to get it back on the assessment rolls. The test is whether there is a rational relationship,
a very low standard. Mr. Snyder pointed out he and Mr. Wilson do not disagree but this is a good
example of why an appraisal should be done on property prior to Council hearings.
Mayor Fahey asked if the entire right -of -way along Lots 1, 2 and 3 was being vacated or only the right -
of -way adjacent to Ms. Greenleaf - Evans' property. Mr. Snyder answered only the right -of -way adjacent
to the Greenleaf -Evans property. Mayor Fahey said the issue raised by Ms. Greenleaf -Evans regarding
subdivision rights on adjacent properties is not germane at this time. Mr. Snyder agreed it was an issue
to be determined at a later date. Mayor Fahey questioned whether the Council would be setting
precedence for future vacations in this area. Mr. Snyder answered the only precedence may be if a
resident is willing to waive development rights, further analysis may not be required.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
HAAKENSON, THAT THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY COMPENSATION TO THE CITY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $3,562; SUBJECT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER RELINQUISHING THE RIGHT
TO DEVELOP A THIRD LOT BASED UPON THE VACATION.
Council President Haakenson pointed out the applicant always had the ability to subdivide. He pointed
out the value of this property may not equate to the cost of the appraisal. He said the only view this
property may have is of the surrounding trees and the $3,562 would address any ability to build a larger
home. He supported the motion.
MOTION CARRIED (Councilmember Earling did not participate in the vote).
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
odway Janet Robertson, 10523 240`h Place SW, Edmonds, presented a report from L & M Echelbarger and
veiopment .Sundquist regarding the 40 -acre development in Woodway. She said the report was developed following
a public meeting with the Planning Commission in Woodway. She referred to a petition and letter from
the residents on their fire lane, which she previously submitted to the City, and expressed concern with
the request for an easement on their fire lane.
Mayor Fahey asked Ms. Robertson if her only concern was with the use of the fire lane as ingress /egress
to the development. Ms. Robertson answered they would accept a locked gate similar to the one into
Woodway Meadows but others want construction vehicles to use the fire lane. Mayor Fahey stressed the
City has taken a strong position that the fire lane not be used for anything except a designated emergency
road and will remain locked. Mr. Snyder agreed. Mayor Fahey stressed the City had no intention of
opening the fire lane for common usage by any vehicle other than emergency response vehicles.
Marsha Fisher indicated she supported Ms. Robertson's comments.
Ordinance Joseph Dray, 21307 Pioneer Way, Edmonds, requested more vigorous enforcement of ordinances
Enforcement regarding dog access at Marina Beach Park in the interest of public peace, health, and safety as well as in
at Marian consideration of wildlife in Marina . Beach Park. He explained the dog walking area south of the
Beach Park petroleum dock is observed by most people. Although signs identify the location of the dog area and that
dogs are forbidden from access to the grassy area and beach at Marina Beach Park, he has noticed more
people ignoring the signs recently. This results in more dogs and fecal matter on the grassy area. Polite
reminders to these people often result in ridicule and their reference to the many other dogs on the grassy
area. He recommended the City patrol Marina Beach Park more frequently, particularly on sunny
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 7
weekend days such as hourly patrols by the Police Department. He requested the individuals patrolling
the park issue tickets to violators with some type of penalty. He suggested consideration be given to
posting larger signs that clearly state the restrictions.
Mayor Fahey said she will pass on his comments to animal control personnel. She commented the City
has limited animal control personnel who patrol the entire City.
ew Train Al Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, reported there is a new train running to Blaine. He
suggested a third train be considered in Edmonds to bring in revenue and tourists.
7. DISCUSSION OF PERFORMING TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF CABLE TV SYSTEM
REBUILD COMPLIANCE
valuation Council President Haakenson advised the Council adopted Resolution No. 953 on May 4 to conduct a
f Cable TV technical evaluation of the cable television system rebuild for compliance with the franchise agreement.
stem In response to the Council's questions regarding the cost of that process, Community Services Director
Paul Mar provided a memo to the Council indicating the cost of the service would be a not -to- exceed
amount of $3,625. Council President Haakenson directed the Council's attention to an e -mail in the
Council packet from Rod Stout regarding the Chambers Cable service he receives, which he provided to
Mr. Gradwohl for a response.
Jack Gradwohl, Area Manager, Chambers Cable, 190 West Dayton, Ste. 201, Edmonds, explained
there are approximately 14,000 drops in the City (active and inactive customers). of which 9,000 have
been completed leaving 5,000 active and inactive drops to be transferred (approximately 4,000
customers). He said they have 25 installers working every day, completing an average of 200+ drops per
day. He estimated they would complete the transfer of all residents in 2 - 3 weeks. Of the 4,000
remaining customers, many are multiple dwelling units rather than single - family homes and can be done
very quickly.
Councilmember Miller said one of the issues in the e-mail was a question regarding Chambers Cable's
previous indication that they would begin the transfer in the north area of the City. This resident lives in
the Meadowdale area and has not had his service transferred. Mr. Gradwohl explained their initial plan
was to begin in the north and work south; however, PUD activation of the power supplies did not allow
this. Further, the grading for a short plat in Node 105 will destroy the plant Chambers recently installed
in that area. Therefore, Chambers has delayed activation of that node until the developer completes that
project.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke said it appears the completion date is a moving target. He asked when
the hook -ups would be complete. Mr. Gradwohl answered they are hoping to have it done in the 2 - 3
week period. He explained as service at each house is transferred, it must be evaluated on an individual
basis. Sometimes, only a transfer from the old to the new system with a small amount of work at the
ground block is necessary, which is simple and fast. Other houses require replacement of the area drop
because it does not carry the signal, and in other situations underground drops must be replaced.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked how many hook -ups have been completed since the last Chambers
Cable presentation. Mr. Gradwohl answered at the time of his last presentation (three weeks ago), they
had 6,000 drops remaining. Since then, they have transferred service for 3,000 more homes,
approximately 1,000 per week. He said additional work crews have been brought in since that time to
increase the number of transfers.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 8
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked if citizens are charged for the new service before they are
transferred. Mr. Gradwohl answered no, they are charged the old rate for the old service until the new
service is provided. Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked what the latest date Chambers Cable
anticipated the project will be completed. Mr. Gradwohl answered four weeks maximum.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke said that would be June 15 - 18.
Mayor Fahey asked if every house currently being serviced by cable will be upgraded. She said one of
her neighbors was told by Chambers Cable that the system upgrade only comes as far as the public road
and any upgrades of the system to houses on a private road must be done by the individual.
Mr. Gradwohl disagreed, explaining Chambers is responsible for upgrading all service unless they are
refused access by the owners of the private road.
Councilmember Earling asked when the penalty period would begin if Chambers Cable is found to be out
of compliance. Mr. Snyder answered it would be a minimum of 30 days because the penalties do not
commence until 30 days after the date established in the franchise. He said this would be further delayed
by the required notice and hearing. In order for the consultant's reports to be valuable to the Council, it
will need to provide an opinion as of the 30"' day and a hearing held the next week. At $500 per day, the
maximum penalties that could be assessed, given Mr. Gradwohl's estimated completion date, would be
two weeks or $7,000. Council President Haakenson said the franchise agreement was dated April 16 and
the Council allowed an additional ten so the 30 days would expire May 26.
Councilmember White pointed out that date also assumed that the consultant agrees the project is not
complete by installation of the physical plant versus making the actual drops: Mr. Snyder agreed the
consultant would need to determine what is the customary usage in the industry.
Mr. Snyder commented the estimated consultant cost did not include testimony time for presenting his
report to the Council.
Councilmember White said if the Council accepts the expected completion date, the best possible gain
for the City would be $3,500 if the consultant finds the system was not complete by the specified date.
Councilmember White said he was not convinced Chambers had not met their obligation according to the
language in the franchise agreement and, therefore, was not inclined to spend $3,600 on a consultant.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke agreed with Councilmember White. Although he would have preferred
Chambers completed the project a month ago, they have demonstrated a strong attempt to get it done.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilmember Miller shared Councilmembers White and Van Hollebeke's concerns but also felt
Chambers needs to be held to the contract. He requested staff provide a weekly update to the Council on
Chambers' progress. If it appears Chambers will miss their targeted completion date of June 15 -18, it
may be advisable to hire a consultant at that time. If the project can be completed by mid -June, he
preferred not spending money on a consultant.
Councilmember Earling said if there is no motion, the action dies.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 9
I
8. FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO IN/TWO OUT COMMAND OFFICER PRESENTATION '
I
Two-In / Acting Fire Chief Kevin Taylor said the Fire Department thanked the Council for the action regarding
Two-Out . Station 16.
Rule
Chief Taylor referred to WAC 296 - 305- 05001, the "2 In 2 Out Rule" and explained the purpose of
tonight's presentation was to provide an overview of current operations, educate the Council on legal
changes which significantly change the fire department operations, show what comparable jurisdictions
have done in response to the same issues, and identify alternatives for Edmonds. He displayed 1998
annual Edmonds Fire Department figures, explaining there has been a continual increase in call load in j
recent years, particularly in the past three years. He said the statistics, which were gathered from the
computer assisted dispatch records management system (CAD RMS), indicate the Edmonds Fire
Department responded to a total of 3,770 calls in 1998. Of those responses, 41.5 were fire dispatches, 85 j
were confirmed fires, and 51 were structure fires with some damage. There were 196 significant
responses of all kinds such as significant fires, hazardous materials, injury accidents, etc.
Chief Taylor described the standard response to a residential structure fire, which includes one command
unit, three engines, and one aid unit for a total of 12 -13 fire combat personnel. The standard response to
a multifamily or commercial structure fire includes one command unit, three engines, one aid unit, and
one ladder truck for a total of 15 -16 fire combat personnel.
In response to the question what affect a couple of minutes makes to Edmonds citizens, he described fire
growth versus reflex time using National Fire Protection Association data. He explained reflex time is
the time it takes the Fire Department to begin operation and cease fire growth. He described the amount
of time it takes for rapid increases in temperature and flashover resulting in unrestrained fire growth in
approximately 10 -11 minutes. He commented in a sprinkled building, fire growth is greatly reduced. He
described times that are indirectly manageable such as the time to detect a fire and the time to report an
alarm, which may total 3 - 4 minutes. He described fire system response time, times that are directly
manageable, such as the time to dispatch units (goal is one minute but actually is 1' /z minutes), response
to the scene (4 - 5 minutes), and set up and attack (60 - 90 seconds). He commented although a 4 5
minute response time sounds good, it is actually 7 - 8 minutes into the response (due to the time to
discover and report the fire and dispatch time which results in the Fire Department intervening close to
the flashover point. Any delay caused by the three- person engine company waiting for a fourth, fifth and
sixth person to arrive has a significant impact on fire growth.
Chief Taylor described the Incident Management System (IMS) that is required by law. This includes
managing all incidents with an Incident Commander (WAC 296- 305- 05001[1]), use of an Incident !
Safety Officer (WAC 296 - 305- 05001[2,3]), establishing an appropriate span of control with the use of
Division Officers /command areas (WAC 296-305-05001[2,31), and staging and rehabilitating firefighters
at the scene. He explained communications are recorded which identify the Incident Commander,
Incident Safety Officer. He summarized the law requires the Fire Department have the following
personnel at a working structure fire: one Incident Commander, one Incident Safety Officer (at
significant incidents), a minimum of two people for an Initial Attack/Search Team, two people for a
second attack/ventilation team, two people for a rapid intervention team, one accountability /aide, one
person managing staging/rehabilitation, two. medical rescue /miscellaneous. backup, for a total of 12 i
members to extinguish a "typical" house fire prior to flashover.
(Councilmember Earling left the meeting at 8:45 p.m.)
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 10
Chief Taylor explained the delivery of fire and emergency medical service is becoming more
complicated and more expensive. He explained the fire service has unique rules, identified as WAC 396 -
305 "Safety Standards for Firefighters." The intent of these rules is to make every employee's workplace
as safe as reasonably possible. The newest rule is "2 in 2 out," which affects staffing levels in the "front
yard" of a fire. The previous WAC allowed a three person engine company to initiate attack and search
in the initial stages of a structural fire. This portion of the WAC 296- 305 -5001 was held to be not as
restrictive as the OSHA rule, therefore, effective June 1, 1999, the initial engine company is no longer
exempt from "2 in 2 out." This means when a three - person engine company arrives at a fire, they must
wait outside until the fourth, fifth, and sixth person on the second engine arrive. Because they cannot go
in until those personnel arrive, an enhanced fire curve will result.
Chief Taylor stressed this is a big difference. When two fire fighters enter any hazardous environment
and/or burning structure, or smoke - filled area (almost every fire response); it is now required to have two
fire fighters equipped, qualified and ready to perform a rescue of those on the inside if necessary.
Exceptions include a known rescue situation such as a victim visible on arrival of the fire department
(rare), or investigating incipient (small) fires. Does Edmonds always meet the standard? Chief Taylor
said eventually, if enough resources are provided, including automatic aid from nearby jurisdictions. He
said many jurisdictions are responding to the "2 in 2 out" issue by increasing mutual aid. He said
Edmonds has had very good automatic aid for the past ten years; therefore, no changes are necessary.
The issue is how to manage the timeliness of the arrival of the 4' firefighter to meet the "2 in 2 out" rule.
He said Edmonds' normal second unit arrival time in 1998 was 2 minutes after the first engine.
Chief Taylor described options available to the City including (1) do nothing - do not enter a hazardous
area until adequate resources are on the scene to meet the requirements of the "2 in 2 out," (2) adding 4
firefighters to each shift (12 new employees), giving us a staffing level of a 4 person engine company
(currently 3). This is what Seattle and other major urban cities are doing, or (3) adding an on -duty
command officer to all hazardous incidents (requires 3 additional employees). He said the average
response time for a command officer in South County has been 14 minutes because they are often not on
duty. An on -duty command officer as part of the response team would enhance the response, but also
requires three additional employees. He displayed a chart showing what cities similar to Edmonds' size
are doing, commenting many operate with 24 -hour command units (battalion chief).
Chief Taylor described the results of each option: Option 1 (continue status quo, do nothing) will result
in bigger fires due to delay in attack, increased property damage, reduced viability for trapped occupants,
increased danger for firefighters (remember the fire curve); and delayed search and rescue operations
increase occupant mortality and injury. The cost for Option 2 (hire 12 firefighters) is $733,000 for year
1, $785,300 for year 2, $839,200 for year 3, $897,950 for year 4, and $924,900 for year 5. Option 3
(assign a command officer, assign three Captains as command officers, promote three Lieutenants to
Captain and hire three firefighters) has a cost of $183,250 for year 1, $196,077 for year 2, $209,800 for
year 3, $224,490 for year 4, and $231,225 for year 5. Chief Taylor explained the emergency benefits of a
command officer such as providing one more emergency unit thereby improving "2 in 2 out" likelihood
and marginally improving response times 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year; the ability to
serve as an incident commander, incident safety officer, public information officer, EOC staff; responds
to all major medical incidents; and provides improved customer service at all levels. He described non -
emergency benefits of a command officer such as improved supervision and coordination between the
three Edmonds stations 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year; assist with training; assigned
multi -site commander 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year; liaison with surrounding
departments; provide daily contact between operations and fire administration; handle personnel issues
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 11
promptly; and provide improved customer service at all levels. Chief Taylor stressed planned resource
responses together with managed reflex times result in successful outcomes.
Chief Taylor outlined his recommendation to enhance the Edmonds Fire Department by adding full -time
command officer coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. He recommended funding
this with overtime coverage for the remainder of the year ($129,600 from unanticipated revenues) and
review permanent funding as part of the 2000 budget process. He said the $129,600 represents a 2.5%
increase in their budget; however, without a Fire Chief, the department is slightly under budget. He
reiterated .planned resource responses together with managed reflex times result in successful outcomes.
Council President Haakenson thanked Chief Taylor for his presentation, commenting it provides more
in -depth information than has been available in the past. Council President Haakenson said at a recent
SnoCom meeting, Lynnwood's Acting Fire Chief Olsen complimented Chief Taylor and the Edmonds
Fire Department for the way the May 11 fire was handled.
Mayor Fahey observed adding command officers would require increasing the rank of three employees.
Fire Chief Taylor said it is done now with captains when staffing levels allow but could not be done on a
permanent basis without elevating the captains' rank to battalion chief. Mayor Fahey observed the cost
for 12 new firefighters (Option 2) averages $61,000 per firefighter. She observed Option 3, adding three
full -time command officers, is also approximately $61,000 per person and questioned whether it would j
be more per person to elevate the rank of existing personnel. Chief Taylor answered the cost of elevating
an employees' rank costs far less than hiring a new employee. He explained entry level firefighters earn
approximately $40,000 per year in addition to costs for equipment and uniforms for a total of
approximately $45,000 each. The estimate of $61,000 for each firefighter in the "hire 12 firefighters"
option contains some "fluff" The $61,000 each was accurate for elevating the rank of three employees
and hiring three new firefighters.
i
Councilmember Plunkett asked how often an internal attack occurs that required "2 in 2 out ". Chief
Taylor said of the 51 structure fires per year, 8 - 12 (approximately one per month) will be extremely
dangerous to employees or civilians and approximately once per year will be a two -alarm fire.
Councilmember Plunkett said the Fire Department must be prepared to make that decision (2 in 2 out)
many more times than that. Chief Taylor agreed, pointing out they must send the same response to every
fire, hazardous .materials, etc. dispatch and be prepared for the "2 in 2 out" environment. Chief Taylor
estimated they must be prepared for a "2 in 2 out" situation approximately every other day.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to the personnel required at each fire (12 members) and said a lay
person may question why Edmonds does not meet the "2 in 2 out" standard with all those people there.
He said the state statute requires those 12 people be assigned to specific tasks. The "2 in 2 out" is the
initial attack/search team and rapid intervention and other personnel cannot participate. Chief Taylor
said there are some exceptions when not all personnel have arrived. He said although the rapid
intervention team is the best for employee and citizen safety, the pump handle operator (if outfitted
properly) can count as one member of the "2 in 2 out" and the Incident Commander can count as another.
This is only practiced in the opening moments of a fire. Councilmember Plunkett clarified all the
personnel have assigned duties; just because there are 1.2 employees, the department may not be able to
fulfill the "2 in 2 out" requirement in an acceptable manner. Chief Taylor said although they respond
with 1.2 people and will eventually meet "2 in 2 out" every time, it could be improved by enhancing the
pre- response package.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 12
Councilmember Plunkett asked what would happen to Incident Commanders if the City consolidated fire
service. Chief Taylor said if a merger occurred, the battalion chiefs could be used to oversee fire
stations.
Councilmember White asked how Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood were addressing "2 in 2 out."
Chief Taylor answered they must abide by the same rules, not go in until a second unit is present. He
said Mountlake Terrace has some funding restrictions and currently has some 2- person engine
companies. Lynnwood staffs at the same level Edmonds does but does not have 24 -hour command
officers. He did not believe Lynnwood would react with the same proposal as Edmonds but would wait
until the end of the year. He noted Edmonds Fire Department is the largest of the three cities.
Councilmember White pointed out this action is necessary to protect fire department employees and
citizens, not because the WAC requires it. Councilmember White said the Council relies on Chief
Taylor's expertise and recommendation and their decision is not based on the WAC. Chief Taylor said it
is a real option to do nothing and some jurisdictions cannot meet the standard for budgetary reasons.
Edmonds is close to meeting the "2 in 2 out" with a reasonable budget allocation.
Mayor Fahey said Edmonds has three fire stations and, therefore, has more firefighters on duty than
either Lynnwood or Mountlake Terrace. She observed Lynnwood has a larger geographic area and, at
least during the day, a larger population than Edmonds, yet they do not staff as well or have as many
stations as Edmonds. She asked if Edmonds was carrying a slightly heavier share of the burden of back
up support to Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace because they cannot meet the standards. Chief Taylor
said the City gives more service than it gets. The relocation of Station 16 will enhance service in that
area. He said emergency response in north Edmonds is not usually provided by Edmonds; with the
relocation of Station 16, service by Edmonds Fire Department will increase but the disparity will also
increase.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
WHITE, TO EXTEND DISCUSSION OF THIS ITEM FOR TEN MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
(Councilmember Earling was not present for the vote).
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked if there was a way to meet the "2 in 2 out" with mutual aid. Chief
Taylor stated that although the average arrival time of the second unit is 2 -5 minutes, there are times that
unit is not Edmonds Fire Department. He said there is nothing that can be done to improve response
times for the existing automatic aid, it is the best it can be.
Councilmember Miller said the consequences of not making a change in the level of service is the key
issue. He said increased time is a safety issue for citizens as well as fire service personnel. He supported
the proposed method to meet the "2 in 2 out" rule as the most cost effective manner of doing so.
COUNCILMEMBER MILLER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE, TO
AUTHORIZE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO FUND A 24 HOUR COMMAND RESPONSE UNIT
UTILIZING UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FUNDING FOR THE REMAINDER OF 1999 AND
REVIEW PERMANENT FUNDING AS PART OF THE 2000 BUDGET PROCESS. MOTION
CARRIED (Councilmember Earling was not present for the vote).
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 13
9. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF PUBLIC WORKS WEEK MAY 16 - 22 1999
ubuc I Mayor Fahey explained the week of May 16 - 22, 1999 . has been designated as National Public Works
Forks wee Week to recognize the accomplishments of Public Works employees. She said a celebration is held for
the Public Works employees for camaraderie and recognition of what they do for citizens. Mayor Fahey
read a proclamation declaring the week of May 16 - 22, 1999 as Public Works Week.
Public Works Director Noel Miller said the Washington State Insurance Authority recognized they are
doing a good job by the below average number of claims the City has received. He expressed
appreciation for the Council's support and invited them to attend the Public Works luncheon on May 19
at the Public Works facility.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke acknowledged the work Public Works does for the citizens. He I
commented the Public Works employees are fiercely proud of their jobs and are the unsung heroes of the
City. He asked Mr. Miller to convey the Council's appreciation to the Public Works staff.
Mayor Fahey commented Public Works is performing an additional function with regard to stormwater .
processing and maintenance as a result of federal mandates. The City is ahead of the curve in this area
due to Mr. Miller's foresight and direction.
Councilmember Plunkett commented a number of residents have mentioned how much they appreciate
the work the Public Works department does.
10. REPORT ON COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Shell Valley Public Safety Committee
Emergency Committee member Plunkett advised the committee discussed the Shell Valley Emergency Road issue.
[toad Issue A private property owner is not willing to allow survey of a future right -of -way in the area; therefore the
committee suggested Police Chief Hickok talk to Engineering about the possibility of providing access
M a from Yost Park to Shell Valley. The second item of discussion was the purchase of a multimedia
projection system and the committee agreed to have this item placed on the Consent Agenda. Police
Chief Hickok next provided an update on the 800 MHz system. The committee also considered two
800 MHz proposals regarding misuse of the 911 system. The committee accepted the draft ordinance that
ystem institutes a progressive fine for misuse of the 91.1 system, which will be placed on a future Consent
Agenda.
11 Misuse Mayor Fahey explained residents must call 911 to report an emergency or non - emergency that requires
ra;nanus police or fire services because that is how dispatch is coordinated in the three -city area. There is no way
for the fire or police administration to dispatch a response. When residents call, they are asked if it is an
emergency or non - emergency situation. If it is an emergency, response is more instantaneous and non -
emergencies are handled on an availability basis. Some residents have indicated non - emergencies are
emergencies to get a quicker response.
kl head Community Service/Development Services Committee
epairs Committee member Van Hollebeke said the committee discussed mid - waterfront design concepts for
bulkhead repairs. There is a plan in place to repair the bulkheads along the waterfront and construct a
continuous walkway from North Brackett's landing to the marina. Various bulkhead repairs are
chool Dist. underway. The second item discussed by the committee was an Interlocal Agreement for the Old
nterlocal Woodway Elementary Playfield, which was placed on the Consent Agenda for authorization. Next, a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 14
I icSafety I progress report on the Public Safety construction project was provided, indicating the project is on
Project budget and slightly behind schedule. Since the project is nearly completed, the committee recommended
the remaining progress reports be given to the entire Council at the monthly work meeting. The
committee then discussed the biological assessment for federal aid projects such as the Highway 99
Hwy 99 project. The report prepared indicates there is no effect for the first phase of the Highway 99 project.
Project Concluding the topics was a discussion of the potential safety improvements on Railroad Avenue.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke said as a result of the ferry loading ramp on Main Street, there is a great
Pedestrian deal more pedestrian traffic. Potential solutions are being evaluated, such as an over - crossing of the
Ferry Traffic tracks, possibly near the Senior Center.
Delinquent Finance Committee
ambling Committee member Miller reported the City Attorney recommended changes in the procedures regarding
axes businesses delinquent in payment of gambling taxes. The City Attorney will draft a letter to the affected
Dump Truck businesses and will attach a copy of the letter to an informational memo to the Council prior to formal
urchase action. The committee next reviewed the purchase of a replacement street division dump truck. Due to
some unique circumstances in the bidding process, there was only one qualified bidder; therefore, it was
Banking recommended this item be presented to the full Council for an explanation of the extenuating
ervices circumstances regarding the sole bid. The third item was a discussion of the banking services contract.
ontract Five banks responded to the bid request. A recommendation to award the banking services contract to
Frontier Bank will be placed on the May 25 Consent Agenda. Next, the committee recommended
dvance increasing the advance travel fund to $7,000. Ms. Hetzler then provided an update on the General Fund,
ravel Fund
advising sales taxes are ahead of last year and should continue on this course due to new car sales in the
pdate on
City. Utility taxes should be under, sales tax equalization should be $150,000 higher than budget and
era] building permits and plan -check fees should exceed budget. Overall, it appears the City will receive
d $400,000 more than was originally budgeted. The committee requested an update on these revenues be
provided each month. Concluding the meeting, petty cash expenditures were reviewed and approved.
11. MAYOR'S REPORT
Fire Station Mayor Fahey thanked the Council for their support and approval of the authorization to move forward
Land with the purchase of land for a new fire station in an area that was not originally anticipated. She
Purchase explained at the time the Public Safety bond issue was presented, it was believed a new fire station
should be constructed on the existing Five Corners site or to the east. The City has been seeking
potential sites in that area. Fire Chief Haworth recommended the City consider a location to the north of
the Fire Corners station so that the station could serve citizens to the north. This resulted in a delay in
the timeline due to the need to evaluate Chief Haworth's recommendation and identify an appropriate
location. She appreciated the indulgence of the firefighters who are awaiting a new fire station and
working in less than desirable conditions as well as the understanding of the citizens who likely were
wondering why no action was being taken with regard to the fire station. She said the sale now needs to
be closed and a determination made regarding whether the design can be constructed on that site without
modifications.
ascadia Mayor Fahey reported on her trip to Victoria for the Cascadia Mayor's Conference, which was attended
Mayor's by Mayors of cities throughout the Pacific Northwest. The purpose is to discuss impacts of growth in the
Conference area in the future and the possibility of working together to meet. the daily demands of growth without
eliminating farm /rural land or open space. She said throughout the Cascade corridor there are 4 million
people and it is projected there will be 6 million by 2020. She said the Cascadia group has collaborated
on significant advertisements to encourage tourism throughout the area.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 15
E outr ak's Mayor Fahey reported on the Amtrak's Mayors Advisory Council she attended last week, explaining only
yors 25 mayors from throughout the nation are serving on the Council. The Council will meet four times a
ncil year in conjunction with other meetings to discuss safety, speeds, service issues, and enhancing Amtrak
as an alternative transportation mode to address the problem of single occupant vehicles. She said her
participation on the Council also provides an opportunity to pursue funding for the multimodal site in
Edmonds, which is looked upon very favorably by Amtrak and the Federal Rail Association.
ericans Mayor Fahey reported she plans to attend a microsummit meeting sponsored by the Americans for
or Heritage Heritage and Recreation who are seeking funding for statewide conservation futures so that funding is
Recreation available for purchase of additional open space in urban areas, as well as maintenance and upgrading of
ballfields and other recreational facilities that will be needed as urban centers are created.
12. COUNCIL REPORTS
isiomng Councilmember Van Hollebeke advised the report on the visioning process will be made on Wednesday,
Meeting May 19� at the Edmonds Theater, 7:00 - 8:30 p.m. He encouraged residents and Councilmembers to
attend.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 6 %. MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke read a letter he submitted to the Council announcing he will not seek re-
ouncil election to the Council due to family and business needs. He said he was making this announcement at
Election
this time to give residents interested in serving on the Council an opportunity to file in July for the fall
election. He said it has been an honor to serve on the Council, and perhaps in the future he can again
serve in the City in some manner.
Mayor Fahey expressed her appreciation to Councilmember Van Hollebeke for the service he provides
the City.
Law Councilmember Miller observed last week was National Law Enforcement Memorial Week. He
Enforcement complimented the Edmonds Police Department for the work they do; commenting officers put their lives
Memorial on the line 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Week
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:06 p.m.
BARBARA S. FAH Y, MYOR
- SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 1999
Page 16
i
I
i
1
i
1
r
n
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
IV PLAZA MEETING ROOM - LIBRARY BUILDING
650 MAIN STREET
7:00 -10:00 P.M.
MAY 18, 1999
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 11, 1999
(C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #29384 THROUGH #32817 FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 10, 1999, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $169,249.16
(D) ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT -OF -WAY FROM THE PLAT OF ESPERANCE COURT
(E) AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE MULTIMEDIA PROJECTION SYSTEM FROM WESTEK
PRESENTATION SYSTEMS
(F) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE FOR THE TASTE OF EDMONDS
(G) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH THE EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL
ASSOCIATION FOR THE ARTS FESTIVAL
(H) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY PARADE AND FIREWORKS DISPLAY
(1) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH EDMONDS -SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY
HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE EDMONDS SUMMER MARKET
(J) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHS
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR SANITARY SEWER METER STATION A REHABILITATION DESIGN PROJECT
(K) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY
AND EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 FOR THE OLD WOODWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
(L) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN THE 1999 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SNOHOMISH
REGIONAL NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
3. (45 Min.) PUBLIC HEARING ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING BOARD REGARDING AN
APPLICATION FOR A "CONTRACT REZONE" OF AN APPROXIMATELY 8,602 SQUARE FOOT LOT
(.20 ACRES) FROM RS -6 TO RM -3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITIONAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT ON THE SUBJECT SITE. THE PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE
STIPULATES ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 403 3RD AVENUE NORTH. (Applicant: Doug Herman / File
No. R -98 -207)
4. (5 Min.) PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3248 DECLARING A ZONING MORATORIUM ON
ZONING CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS RELATING TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
MAY 18, 1999
Page 2 of 2
5. (15 Min.) PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUED DELIBERATION OF A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE
180TH STREET SOUTHWEST RIGHT -OF -WAY ADJACENT TO 8615 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE (Applicant:
Lori Greenleaf /Evans / File No. ST- 98 -52)
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3 Minute Limit Per Person)
7. (60 Min.) FIRE DEPARTMENT TWO- IN/TWO -OUT COMMAND OFFICER PRESENTATION
8. (5 Min.) DISCUSSION OF PERFORMING TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF CABLE TV SYSTEM REBUILD
COMPLIANCE
9. (5 Min.) PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF PUBLIC WORKS WEEK, MAY 16-22,1999
10. (15 Min.) REPORT ON COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
11. (5 Min.) MAYOR'S REPORT
12. (15 Min.) COUNCIL REPORTS
'arking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771 -0245 with 24 hours advance
otice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 32. Delayed telecast of this meeting
ppears the following Wednesday, Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 32.