06/06/2000 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
JUNE 69 2000
Following a Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. for an Executive Session regarding a real estate matter, the
Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Library
Plaza Room, 650 Main Street. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Thomas A. Miller, Council President
Dave Earling, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Jim White, Councilmember
Lora Petso, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Christopher Davis, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Maia Krause, Student Representative
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STAFF PRESENT
Robin Hickok, Police Chief
Peggy Hetzler, Administrative Services Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
James Walker, City Engineer
Michael Karber, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Change Councilmember Miller requested Item #4 be removed from the agenda in response to a letter received
Agenda to late this afternoon from the appellant's attorney withdrawing their application.
Removal of
Item #4 COUNCIL PRESIDENT MILLER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
REMOVE ITEM #4 FROM THE AGENDA DUE TO THE APPELLANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF
THEIR APPLICATION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Earling recalled at the last Council meeting, when the Council discussed how to resolve
Shoreline
Master issues between the Port of Edmonds and the City, he made a motion to create a taskforce to include a
Program minimum of two Councilmembers to address those issues. Following the meeting, Roger Hertrich
Taskforce brought to his attention that discussion could lead to the creation of a rolling quorum (a decision made
during the process and not in a Council meeting). Councilmember Earling agreed with Mr. Hertrich and
thanked him for bringing this to his attention. Councilmember Earling indicated he e- mailed
Councilmembers the day following the Council meeting to clarify that the intent of the taskforce was to
have the taskforce negotiate and provide information to the Council in a written or oral format at a
regularly scheduled Council meeting.
COUNCILMEM 3ER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 1
fl
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Earling requested Item H be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER DAVIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
(A) ROLL CALL
Approve
5/23 (B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 23, 2000
Minutes
Approve (C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #35964 THROUGH #41304 FOR THE WEEK OF
Claim MAY 22, 2000, IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,019.86
Checks
Claim for I (D) ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM TOM PETROWITZ
Damages I (Amount Undetermined)
Hwy 99
Project I (E) UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99 PROJECT
Water Main (F) REPORT ON BIDS OPENED MAY 23, 2000 FOR THE 2000 WATER MAIN
Replace - I REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO KAR -VEL
meet i CONSTRUCTION, INC. ($302,428.09, INCLUDING SALES TAX)
d gin g Taxi (G) CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENT OF LORA PETSO, JAN CONNER, JOHN
visory EDWARDS, FRANCES CHAPIN, HELLON WILKERSON, QUENTIN CLARK, CAMI .
mmittee SMITH, LORNA HUDGENS, AND JOHN WILKINS TO THE LODGING TAX
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Police Lease
(I)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A POLICE LEASE ADDENDUM WITH
ddendum—
FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CI, Inc.
Flag Day
(J)
PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF FLAG DAY ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2000
Reso —
(K)
RESOLUTION NO. 982 COMMENDING MAIA KRAUSE, STUDENT
M. Krause, use
Student Rep.
REPRESENTATIVE, FOR HER SERVICE
Ord #3314
(L)
ORDINANCE NO. 3314 AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CDC 20.91
IF-ontinuance
CODE CHAPTER 20.91 TO ADD A NEW SECTION 20.91.030 CONTINUANCES
Item H: Authorization for Expenditure of $7,500 from the Ending Cash Balance of the Hotel/Motel Fund
FACE ( #120.000.310.575.42.51) to Fund the Feasibility Study for the Proposed Fine Arts Center of Edmonds
Feasibility FACE
Study
Councilmember Earling stated he removed this item from the Consent Agenda to explain it was an
important issue to the community. He explained this was the "finishing piece" of an enormous amount
of work regarding the proposed Fine Arts Center of Edmonds and would be completed with funds
provided by the Hotel/Motel Tax. He thanked Michael Smith and others who have worked so hard on
this issue.
COUNCILMEMBER EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM H. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda item approved is as follows:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 2
(H) AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE OF $7,500 FROM THE ENDING CASH
BALANCE OF THE HOTEL/MOTEL FUND ( #120.000.310.575.42.51) TO FUND THE
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED FINE ARTS CENTER OF EDMONDS
(FACE)
aia Krause 3. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE AND RESOLUTION TO MAIA KRAUSE STUDENT
Student
Representa-
REPRESENTATIVE
tive
Council President Miller explained Ms. Krause had been the Student Representative since the beginning
of the year. He read Resolution No. 982, in recognition of Maia Krause for her services as student
member of the Edmonds City Council.
Mr. Krause thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve as Student Representative. She said she
learned a great deal about the Council and how local government worked. She hoped the next Student
Representative would find the experience as interesting as she had.
Council President Miller expressed his appreciation for Ms. Krause's participation as Student
Representative.
Butterfield/ 4. BUTTERFIELD/DYKES APPEAL REGARDING PROJECT LOCATED AT 110 SUNSET
Dykes AVENUE CLOSED RECORD MEETING — APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S
Appeal - DECISION TO DENY ADB- 99 -33, A MIXED USE BUILDING WITHIN THE COMMUNITY
AP -99 -187 BUSINESS (BQ ZONE. (Appellant: Brad Butterfield & Albert Dykes / File No. AP -99 -187.
Applicant: Brad Butterfield / File No. ADB- 99 -33. Property Location: 110 Sunset Ave.l
This item was removed from the agenda (action taken under Agenda Item #1).
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor's Al Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, expressed concern that few members of the Council
Ton Meet ng would attend Saturday's meeting. He said in the past such meetings included the Finance Director to
answer questions. He expressed his concern with the former Finance Director's 5 -year revenue
projections.
Mayor Haakenson clarified the meeting Mr. Rutledge was referring to was the Town Meeting he was
holding at the Edmonds Theater on Saturday, June 10 at 9:00 a.m. He said the Council was invited and
staff would also be present. He said citizens were welcome to attend and ask questions on any, subject
although the focus of the meeting would be the budget and priorities citizens would like to have set in the
budget in the event expenditure reductions were necessary.
Ordinance Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, referred to Item L on the Consent Agenda (proposed
Amending ordinance amending Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.91 to add a new Section
ECDC 20.91 20.91.030 Continuances) and stated his objection to this item being approved on the Consent Agenda
Continuance
when there had been no public discussion.
Mr. Hertrich expressed his appreciation for Councilmember Earling's action regarding his concern with
Open Public the perception of a rolling quorum. Mr. Hertrich said it appeared the Council did not understand the
Aet
Meetings meaning of the Open Public Meetings Act. Mr. Hertrich referred to a January 21, 1999 memo from City
Attorney Scott Snyder to Council President Haakenson that stated public business or action includes
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 3
discussions, considerations, reviews, evaluations and final actions. Mr. Snyder's memo indicated his
feeling regarding rolling quorums was that any discussion held in private that resulted in an action was
not appropriate and the Council should refuse to consider an item of public business that could result in
an action. Mr. Hertrich said the Council's adoption of Consent Agenda Item L indicated that some
discussion took place prior to placing it on the Consent Agenda. He recommended the Council be
regularly reminded of the rules.
Outdoor on Hall, 818 Bell Street, Edmonds, whose wife owns a store on 5' Avenue, said his only objection to
Display of the Planning Board's recommendation regarding outdoor display of merchandise was the requirement for
Merchandise
merchants to remove all merchandise at night and place it inside the store. He said this was feasible for
lightweight merchandise but was not feasible for their merchandise — statuaries, concrete benches, etc.
He said the merchants should be able to decide whether to bring the merchandise inside. He commented
in four years, none of the merchandise left outside overnight had been stolen or vandalized but was often
sold the next day after someone saw it after business hours. He said eliminating this requirement would
also allow them to compete with stores who have space in front of their store that was not City property.
He urged the Council to consider this issue when reviewing the outdoor display of merchandise.
Jim Walker, Jim Walker, City Engineer, 1215" Avenue N, Edmonds, advised he accepted a position with the City
City of New Castle as their Public Works Director. He said he enjoyed working for the City and with the
Engineer - Council and would miss many aspects of his position.
Resignation
Council President Miller expressed his appreciation for everything Mr. Walker had done for the City and
wished him well in his new position.
dinance In response to the concerns expressed by Mr. Hertrich regarding the amendment to the ECDC to add a
mending new section regarding continuances; passed on the Consent Agenda, Council President Miller said this
CDC 20.91 action was recommended by City Attorney Scott Snyder. A draft ordinance was distributed to the
Continuance Council at the last Council meeting and there were no comments /concerns expressed by any
Councilmember and no discussion had occurred. The item was then placed on the Consent Agenda. He
said any Councilmember could have removed the item from the Consent Agenda for further discussion.
Elec tion 6. INFORMATION REGARDING 2000 ELECTION DATES FOR SNO -ISLE ANNEXATION OR
Election
Dates PROPERTY TAX LEVY LID LIFT VOTE FOR POSSIBLE COUNCIL ACTION
Administrative Services Director Peggy Hetzler explained during the April 25 Council meeting, the
Edmonds Library Board presented their recommendation that the Council consider authorizing a ballot
issue for annexation into the Sno -Isle Regional Library System. The Library Board proposed the
election be held in conjunction with the September primary. During the April 25 meeting, the Council
requested information regarding possible election dates remaining in 2000 as well as information
regarding a levy lid lift election for Public Safety.
Ms. Hetzler referred to a schedule of election dates prepared by the Snohomish- County Auditor's Office
that was included in the Council packet and explained if the Council wished to lace a ballot measure on
the September ballot, the Council must approve a resolution authorizing the election by August 4. She
said the Snohomish County Auditor's Office also requested the City inform them by June 14 whether
any special ballot measures would be placed on the primary or general election ballot.
Ms. Hetzler explained if the Council chose to place a measure on the ballot for annexation to the Sno -Isle
district and if the election was successful, the annexation would not be effective until January 2002.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 4
However, a levy lid lift election, conducted anytime during 2000, would be effective January 2001. She
said both elections required only a simple majority vote for approval and no voter turnout requirement.
As an alternative to annexation into the Sno -Isle District, staff explored the option of a levy lid lift. The
benefit of this option was a tax rate of $0.34 per $1,000 of assessed valuation versus the Sno -Isle rate of
$0.50 per $1,000. She said since the initial discussions, interest had been expressed by citizens regarding
a dedicated levy lid lift for Public Safety versus the library. She explained the City's total Public Safety
costs were approximately $10.3 million. Total property tax revenue for 2000 was $8.6 million.
Assuming property tax revenue should at least cover the cost of Public Safety, a case could be made that
a levy lid lift in the amount of the shortfall ($1.7 million) could be structured at a rate of $0.53 per
$1,000 of assessed valuation.
Ms. Hetzler said staff was seeking direction from the Council regarding whether to advise the Snohomish
County Auditor that the City was considering special ballot measures for the primary or general election.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to Ms. Hetzler's comment "assuming that property tax revenue should
at least cover the cost of public safety," and said that was a huge assumption. He asked if there was any
legal or financial requirement for property taxes to cover the cost of public safety. Ms. Hetzler answered
no, it was one scenario.
Councilmember Petso asked the cost to place a measure on the ballot. Ms. Hetzler answered the cost of a
special election was approximately $40,000. The estimated cost for the primary or general election was
unknown at this time as the cost was based on the number of ballot measures proposed and the entities
proposing them. She said it would be significantly less than $40,000.
Councilmember Earling asked if Snohomish County was seeking information whether the Council may
be bring forward an election issue or the specifics of the issue by June 14. Ms. Hetzler answered
Snohomish County asked for the number and type of issues being proposed. City Clerk Sandy Chase
agreed Snohomish County was only seeking the number of ballot measures by June 14.
Councilmember Earling asked what necessitated the June 14 deadline. Ms. Chase answered that was the
deadline established by the Snohomish County Auditor and presumed it was to determine the space
requirements in the local voters pamphlet. Councilmember Earling observed the June 14 deadline did
not have the same legal requirements as the August 4 deadline. Ms. Hetzler and Ms. Chase agreed.
Councilmember Earling observed the deadline could be missed slightly.
Councilmember Earling preferred annexation into the Sno -Isle District and the levy lid lift be discussed
at the Mayor's Town Meeting this Saturday and objected to making a decision before that discussion
took place.
Mayor Haakenson asked how the dates would be affected if I -695 was upheld and the Council chose to
place a property tax increase on the ballot. Ms. Hetzler said the only remaining election dates in 2000
were September 19 and November 7 and any election would have to occur on those dates.
Mayor Haakenson asked how the information gathered at the Town Meeting would be provided to the
Council. Councilmember Earling said it appeared June 14 was a "soft date ", the date Snohomish County
would like to know the number of special ballot measures. He said the City could indicate to Snohomish
County that the Council was seriously considering some type of issue. Ms. Chase and Ms. Hetzler
indicated that would be adequate at this time
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 5
�I
tdoor 7. REVIEW OF PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF
play of MERCHANDISE
rchandise
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this item was forwarded to the Council by the Planning Board
following a lengthy review. He explained the Development Code allowed outdoor displays as a
Conditional Use Permit only in certain commercial zones. He acknowledged there were numerous
downtown business that had outdoor displays without complaint but technically, it was not allowed.
He explained in August 1999, the Council adopted a moratorium on enforcing the prohibition of outdoor
displays. The Planning Board considered the issue and prepared a recommendation indicating limited
outdoor display should be a permitted secondary use as long as was done in conjunction with an existing
legal business operation on the property (a business could not have an outdoor display for merchandise
not sold on the property). Other requirements included maintaining a 4 -foot clear space in front of the
property if the display was in the public right -of -way; not placing outdoor displays in or on street
furniture, parking meters, public signage, planter boxes, etc.; and displays within the public right -of -way
required an encroachment permit. He said if the merchandise was not displayed in the public right -of-
way, an encroachment permit was not necessary.
Mr. Chave referred to the requirement proposed by the Planning Board that displays in the public right -
of -way be removed and stored indoors during non - business hours. He said the Planning Board discussed
this issue extensively and ultimately included the provision for removal of outdoor displays during non -
business hours in their recommendation. Mr. Chave advised the final provision in the Planning Board's
recommendation was that all sales transactions occur inside the building.
Councilmember Davis referred to the motion made by the Council at the August 3, 1999 meeting
establishing a moratorium on enforcement of the current regulations for a period of 180 days. He
pointed out the 180 day period had elapsed and asked if the regulations were now being enforced. Mr.
Chave answered no enforcement action would be taken without a complaint. Councilmember Davis
asked if the moratorium needed to be extended. Mr. Chave said it could be extended but that action
would require an ordinance and a public hearing within 60 days. He anticipated this action could be
completed within that time period.
Councilmember Orvis asked if a sign and display would require two signs. Mr. Chave advised one
encroachment permit could address all encroachment activities in the right -of -way as long as all
activities were listed on the permit. An additional encroachment permit could potentially be required if
other activities were added. He clarified temporary signage (i.e. sandwich board signs) was not covered
under this ordinance but could be included in the encroachment permit.
Councilmember Orvis asked if the encroachment permit included provisions to revoke the permit if
necessary. Mr. Chave answered the encroachment permit could be conditioned if it was. necessary to
have the merchandise removed from the public right -of -way. He said if a business did not abide by the
conditions of the encroachment permit, it could be revoked under the nuisance provisions.
Councilmember White asked the fee for an encroachment permit. Mr. Chave answered $150 and it did
not require renewal. Mr. Karber explained the encroachment permit included a legal description of the
property, depiction of the right -of -way and encroachment area, and a succinct description of the nature of
the encroachment.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 6
Councilmember White asked if the $150 fee was related to the cost of administering the encroachment
permit. Mr. Chave answered yes. Councilmember White commented the term "decorative items" in
ECDC Section 17.65.010(A) might be ambiguous and subject to abuse. He referred to the statement in
ECDC Section 17.65.010 (A), "display items shall not include signage which otherwise require a sign
permit" and assumed this did not refer to signage on tables. Mr. Chave advised incidental signage would
not be regulated. Signage such as an additional sandwich board sign or signage that otherwise would
require a sign permit would not be allowed.
Councilmember Orvis suggested the second sentence be revised to read, "Display items shall be limited
to a sampl@ merchandise sold by the business or decorative items which relate to or complement the
business."
COUNCIL PRESIDENT MILLER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE, TO
SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 18, 2000. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor's Mayor Haakenson encouraged citizens to attend the Town Meeting on Saturday, June 10 at the Edmonds
Town Theater at 9:00 a.m. and to provide input regarding the budget and budget priorities for this year and
Meeting possibly 3 -4 years in the future.
Special
Council
Meeting Mayor Haakenson advised the Council Committee meetings on June 13 would be held at City Hall to
Location accommodate setup for the Arts Festival next week.
im Walker, Mayor Haakenson thanked City Engineer Jim Walker for his contributions to the City. Mayor
ity Haakenson advised Mr. Walker had accepted the Public Works Director position with the City of New
Engineer Castle.
9. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council President Miller wished Councilmember Plunkett a Happy Birthday this weekend. He also
congratulated Student Representative Maia Krause and wished her well in her future endeavors.
Lodging Tax Councilmember Petso (a member of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee) commented that the funds
Advisory for the feasibility study for the Fine Arts Center of Edmonds (FACE) was not General Fund money but
Committee
came from hotel /motel merchants from overnight stays in the City. She explained there were
considerable restrictions on how the funds could be spent. The Committee's next meeting (9:30 a.m.,
July 20 in the 3`d floor conference room in City Hall) would include developing a draft budget for the
Committee's portion of the 2001 budget. She said the Committee's last meeting included a lively
discussion regarding the FACE project and the committee members were not unanimous regarding the
future of that project but agreed a feasibility study was necessary.
Internet Councilmember White reported the recent Snohomish County Tomorrow meeting included a
Freedom Act presentation on the Internet Freedom Act that is currently before Congress. He explained this act
implemented the prohibition of taxing Internet transactions. He said although this concept made sense as
it allowed fledging industries an opportunity to build up, currently 45% of the State's tax budget was
generated via sales tax, of that, 1% was generated via retail sales on the Internet. It was conservatively
projected that in five years, 6% of retail sales in the State would be via the Internet. This would create a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 7
budget crisis more than twice that currently experienced by I -695. He recommended the long range
ramifications of that issue be considered.
Student Representative Maia Krause advised school was wrapping up; senior graduation was Saturday
and the last day of school was Friday.
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
44Y HA NSON, MAYOR
SANDRA S. CfiASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 6, 2000
Page 8
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
97i' ' 3E`ti.
Plaza Meeting Room - Library Building
650 Main Street
7:00 -10:00 a.m.
JUNE 6, 2000
SPECIAL MEETING
6:30 P.M. — EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A REAL ESTATE MATTER
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 23, 2000
(C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #35964 THROUGH #41304 FOR THE WEEK OF MAY 22, 2000, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $1281019.86.
(D) ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM TOM PETROWITZ (Amount
Undetermined)
(E) UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 99 PROJECT
(F) REPORT ON BIDS OPENED MAY 23, 2000 FOR THE 2000 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO KAR -VEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. ($302,428.09, INCLUDING SALES
TAX)
(G) CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENT OF LORA PETSO, JAN CONNER, JOHN EDWARDS, FRANCES
CHAPIN, HELLON WILKERSON, QUENTIN CLARK, CAMI SMITH, LORNA HUDGENS, AND JOHN
WILKINS TO THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
(H) AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE OF $7,500 FROM THE ENDING CASH BALANCE OF THE
HOTEL /MOTEL FUND ( #120.000.310.575.42.51) TO FUND THE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE
PROPOSED FINE ARTS CENTER OF EDMONDS (FACE)
(I) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A POLICE LEASE ADDENDUM WITH FINANCIAL
CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(J) PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF FLAG DAY ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2000
(K) PROPOSED RESOLUTION COMMENDING MAIA KRAUSE, STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE, FOR HER
SERVICE
(L) PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CHAPTER
20.91 TO ADD A NEW SECTION 20.91.030 CONTINUANCES
3. (5 Min.) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE AND RESOLUTION TO MAIA KRAUSE, STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE
4. (30 Min.) BUTTERFIELD /DYKES APPEAL REGARDING PROJECT LOCATED AT 110 SUNSET AVENUE
CLOSED RECORD MEETING — APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION TO DENY ADB-
99-33, A MIXED -USE BUILDING WITHIN THE COMMUNITY BUSINESS (BC) ZONE. (Appellant: Brad
Butterfield & Albert Dykes / File No. AP -99 -187. Applicant: Brad Butterfield / File No. ADB- 99 -33.
Property Location: 110 Sunset Ave.)
"Please Note: A request to remand this matter to City staff for consideration is pending."
Page 1 of 2
f'
J
1
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
JUNE 6, 2000
Page 2 of 2
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3 Minute Limit Per Person)
6. (20 Min.) INFORMATION REGARDING 2000 ELECTION DATES FOR SNO -ISLE ANNEXATION OR PROPERTY
TAX LEVY LID LIFT VOTE FOR POSSIBLE COUNCIL ACTION
7. (15 Min.) REVIEW OF PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF MERCHANDISE
8. (5 Min.) MAYOR'S REPORT
9. (15 Min.) COUNCIL REPORTS
Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771 -0245 with 24 hours advance
notice for special accommodations. The Council .4genda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 46 Delayed telecast of this meeting
appears the following Wednesday at noon and 7: 00 p.m., as well as, Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 46.