08/15/2000 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
AUGUST 15, 2000
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Gary Haakenson in the
Library Plaza Room, 650 Main Street, followed by the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Jim White, Council President Pro Tem
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Lora Petso, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Christopher Davis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Thomas A. Miller, Council President
Dave Earling, Councilmember
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STAFF PRESENT
Peggy Hetzler, Administrative Services Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer
Mike Linn, Construction Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DAVIS, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WHITE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PLUNKETT, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
(A) ROLL CALL
Approve 8/8 mutes (B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 8, 2000
IM Approve (C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #41307 THROUGH #42926 FOR THE WEEK OF
Claim AUGUST 7, 2000, IN THE AMOUNT OF $590,424.54
Checks
Findings of (D) APPROVAL OF FINDINGS .OF FACT REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON
Fact AUGUST 1, 2000 ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE
ngiono- APPLICATION BY INES ANGIONO- FOURNO, ET. AL. TO REZONE
Foumo APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES FROM RM -3 TO RM -1.5. THE REZONE INCLUDES
File No. THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES: 533 539 551 553 558 560 561 563 565 570 572
R- 99-231 > > e > > > > > > > >
580, 582, 588 AND 590 ELM WAY; AND 1122 6TH AVENUE SOUTH (File No. R -99 -231)
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 1
I
National (E) PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF NATIONAL HEALTH CENTER WEEK, AUGUST 20-
Wtth 26, 2000
ter Wee
7Appeposed Mayor Haakenson referred to a fax copy of a letter he received from Bob Walkley, attorney for
al) ety Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad, indicating BNSF had withdrawn their permit application
ce on to construct a fence at Sunset Avenue, therefore, no public hearing would be necessary before the City
set Ave. Council on the Wassall a eal on inall scheduled for Au ust 29, 2000 The letter stated BNSF
assall pp ( g Y g )• reserved the right to reapply if the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTG)
continued to require structures at the top of the bluff on Sunset Avenue or it became otherwise necessary
to reapply. BNSF's letter further stated the withdrawal action did not affect permits or plans for Ocean
Avenue at this time which remain in effect pending WUTC review. BNSF expressed their appreciation
for the hard work and cooperation provided by the City on these controversial proposals, particularly the
efforts of staff and the City Council over the past five years. BNSF indicated their pleasure with the
alternate proposal and hoped for a speedy and successful review before the )ATUTC.
Mayor Haakenson explained that although this was not necessarily the end, BNSF's withdrawal of their
application represented a strong commitment on their part to resolve the issue of the fence at Sunset
Avenue. Further, Mayor Haakenson indicated the WUTC would also consider resolution to the fence at
Ocean Avenue at the same time.
ECDC 3• PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 3317, THE TITLE OF WHICH
20.91.030 - READS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS WASHINGTON REPEALING
Continuances SECTION 20.91.030 CONTINUANCES REENACTING SUCH SECTION 20.91.030
CONTINUANCES AS AN INTERIM ZONING REGULATION, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING
AND FIXING A DATE WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE
City Attorney Scott Snyder said this was a required public hearing on an interim zoning measure. He
explained the Council was authorized to enact certain interim zoning measures and zoning moratoria
without a public hearing, provided a public hearing was held at a later date. He said the Council passed
what was viewed as a procedural ordinance regarding continuances; because the procedures were in the
zoning code, the Planning Board's recommendation was required. When that was discovered, the
Council repealed the ordinance and enacted it as an interim zoning measure and referred it to the
Planning Board for recommendation. This public hearing was to accept public comment and the Council
would take no action at the conclusion of the public hearing.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, recalled . when he was on the Council, an
applicant/appellant was required to appear on the evening the hearing was advertised and make an appeal
to. continue the hearing to a later date. He said this allowed the Council the opportunity to accept public
comment from those who were present to address the issue in the event they were unable to attend a
continued hearing. He said although it was convenient to allow the Council President to make the
decision, that decision would omit' members of the public who may have been planning to speak at the
hearing. He commented there also may be different .circumstances based on whether the Council
President knew the applicant/appellant. He said the proposed procedure resulted in the Council losing
the ability to make the decision of whether to grant a continuance. He also expressed concern with who
would determine what was good cause and felt the entire Council should snake that decision on the
evening the hearing was scheduled.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 2
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the
public hearing.
Mr. Snyder said the ordinance applied only to quasi judicial hearings and not to general legislative
matters. As a result of Regulatory Reform, the Council did not hold public hearings on quasi judicial
matters but held only appeals. As the proposed procedures would apply only to quasi judicial appeals,
only the appellants and parties of record who could speak at the appeal would be notified and have an
opportunity to respond to the Council President.
Edmonds 4. PRESENTATION BY THE EDMONDS ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Alliance for
Economic David Peterson, Executive Consultant to the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development soon to
Develop-
ment be the Executive Director), introduced Mikael- Hattrup, Program Coordinator for the Edmonds Alliance
for Economic Development. Mr. Peterson said over the past month, the EAED developed a work
program for the next 2 -3 years. He explained the EAED was a group working together, with a 13-
member board with representation from the City, the Port of Edmonds, Edmonds Community College,
the private sector, and representatives from the arts, commercial interests and property owners. He said
their goal in the next 2 -3 years was the Central Business District but some programs would have
influence throughout the community.
Mr. Peterson explained the goals seek economic development, not an increase in taxes but an increase in
tax base, which would increase revenue to the City as well as enhance the existing high quality of life.
To accomplish these goals, the work program addresses parking, building codes, Sound Transit
commuter rail, and tourism development on waterfront properties.
Mr. Peterson emphasized the EAED did not have a capital fund and would not be purchasing and
developing property; they would not be loaning money, and did not have zoning power. Their role was
to be a catalyst between and within, and to work cooperatively in support of various groups. He said
their goal was to play a leadership role in assisting the City, Port, Unocal, and property owners to
expand/develop the economic base in the community in a way that protected and enhanced the village
character that exists throughout the downtown area. He agreed there would still be times where there
would be debate but the cooperation pledged by the adoption of the work program lead them to believe
they could achieve a balanced program over the next 2 -3 years.
Mr. Peterson said in the next calendar year, the base of the EAED would be broadened to seek support
from the private sector. He acknowledged the EAED needed the City's financial support but, more
importantly, needed the City's support and leadership in programs that address redevelopment efforts.
As there would be zoning issues, he said the EAED was watching the consultant study being done
regarding the development process.
Councilmember Plunkett asked Mr. Peterson to identify the potential for Edmonds and what economic
development meant to citizens (not necessarily the impact on the City's tax base). Mr. Peterson
explained there was a delicate balance to retaining the quality and continuing to build the economic base.
He said economic development did not mean "huge factories or huge office buildings" but a balance. He
said the property from Unocal to the current ferry landing and property further back was among the
finest property left in the Puget Sound area, causing the area to be noticed by others. He said the Port's
plan was also seeking a proper balance. He explained there was a way to achieve economic development-
that supported retail, restaurants and quality of residential life that currently exists. He pointed out
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 3
commuter rail in the heart of downtown allowing a 23 minute trip to downtown Seattle, would have a
great impact on the community.
Mr. Peterson commented there was nothing wrong with addressing the City tax base, pointing out there
was an opportunity to assist with increasing the tax base via high quality development. He emphasized
the ability to have quality growth and quality development and enhance a community rather than detract
from it. He pointed out the conversion ofthe old railroad yards in Spokane (for the Worlds Fair), viewed
early in the process as an impediment to the quality of 'life, was now viewed as an aesthetic and
environmental improvement.
Councilmember Petso asked which specific zoning issues was the EAED interested in. Mr. Peterson
answered there had been comments made in the past regarding whether Edmonds was doing it's fair
share in accepting increased density; one of the issues to be addressed would be how to increase density
without infringing on neighbors and in a way that would not be detractive to neighborhoods. Another
area was parking, what parking trends are, public transportation and whether the old standards for
parking were still appropriate for this community's demographics. A third issue was the stage at which
design review occurred, near the beginning to guide planning and development or at the end. He said
other communities have found moving that process to the beginning could better assist with guiding
development. He said that although the HyattPalma study recommended increased height, that would
not be addressed by the EAED. He said although he believed there were areas in the community where
some selective height could be accommodated, that issue would be project driven and had nothing to do
with the EAED's work program. He said it was not necessary to increase height limits in the community
to achieve economic development.
Councilmember Petso asked how the focus could be expanded from the downtown business district to
Hwy. 99 and neighborhood businesses. Mr. Peterson said if they did too many things at first, they would
not do any of them well. The members of the EAED have indicated this was not the end, but represented
a 2 -3 year commitment to a portion of the City that could move to other areas in the future. He did not
want anyone to think only the EAED could work on economic development and encouraged aggressive
City and/or neighborhood programs to be undertaken in other areas of the City.
Councilmember Davis asked Mr. Peterson to describe the scope of some of the projects on the work
program. Mr. Peterson advised projects would include a directory to guide visitors; a newsletter;
undertaking a comprehensive research program so that information regarding ferry trips, hotels, parking,
etc. would be available. to retailers, the City, etc.; work with Unocal, the City, the Port and private
property owners to bring strong attractions to the community; supporting FACE; and, if appropriate,
working closely on redevelopment of the Puget Sound Christian College. He said EAED was already
working with Sound Transit regarding opportunities for Edmonds as the first stop from Seattle.
Councilmember Plunkett asked how Ms. Hattrup was involved with the public. Mr. Peterson said Ms.
Hattrup, as the Program Coordinator, was available at their office in City Hall (within the Chamber of
Commerce office).
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Edmonds Ray Albano, 20916 76 "' Avenue West, Edmonds, commented there was no tax base in Edmonds other
ante for than on Hwy. 99. He supported Edmonds developing a retail tax base rather than a property tax base.
nomic He objected to the EAED having an office in City Hall, commenting there had been no worthwhile
Clop increase in economic development. He recommended getting others involved in the process who were
not politicians or downtown property owners. He said the absence of handicapped parking in the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 4
downtown area limited many citizens to only a few restaurants. He was in the process of learning the
number of required handicapped on- street parking spaces.
Mayor Haakenson commented the EAED shared office space with the Chamber of Commerce who paid
rent to the City. If the EAED acquired new space in City Hall, they would also pay rent.
Library George Everett, 617 Dayton Street, Edmonds, said he attended two meetings earlier this year where
Funding the question of property taxes and the library arose and both times the Mayor asked the Administrative
Services Director the amount the City received in property taxes to which she answered approximately
$8 million. The Mayor then asked how much the City spent on fire and police to which she answered
approximately $10 million. The Mayor then stated property taxes did not cover basic services. Mr.
Everett said this one -sided approach concerned him. He pointed out the City could pay the $1 million
cost of the library from the $8 million in property taxes and still have $7 million left for other expenses.
He said this was a budget problem not a library problem. He remarked the City planned to solve the
problem by using funds earmarked for the library for other things and funding the library via a new
property tax. He commented some of the Mayor's budget scenarios that showed a balanced budget
assumed the library would be out of the General Fund by 2002. He said the scenario should have also
described the new property tax because citizens likely have not heard enough about it to convince them
to vote for it. He questioned what happened if citizens voted no, would the library go away?
Proposed Jim Wassall, 342 Sunset Avenue, Edmonds, thanked the Mayor and Council for their interest in trying
Safety to keep trespassers off the Burlington Northern tracks. He also thanked the 2,190 people who read and
Fence on
Sunset Ave. signed their informal petition. He thanked their neighbors and friends for their support regarding this
(Wassall fence issue. Mr. Wassall expressed particular thanks to Mayor Haakenson, commenting that without his
Appeal) assistance, there would be a 2 -rail, steel pipe fence along Sunset Avenue. He said although the fence did
not affect his view of Puget Sound, it would interfere with the view enjoyed by many who park along
Sunset Avenue to enjoy the view. Further, the 2 -rail fence would not deter anyone from trespassing. He
hoped the WUTC would eventually respond positively to the proposal for thorny plantings on the top of
the bluff in areas where trespass could occur.
Public Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, agreed with Mr. Wassall's expression of appreciation to
Safety Mayor Haakenson for his efforts regarding the fencing issue. Mr. Hertrich expressed concern with the
Complex pile of dirt in the center of the Public' Safety Complex parking lot, stating he was advised that there may
Construction not be any plan available for the grading. He asked whether there was an approved, completed plan for
grading, curb cuts, ramps, and parking lot development. Mayor Haakenson answered yes.
Mr. Hertrich asked if there had been any Architectural Design Board (ADB) involvement. He asked if
the City had a contractor for the parking lot. He learned there had been 29% in change orders, observing
10% was about normal. He questioned whether the moneys being spent would exceed the bond issue
and, if so, how the new fire station would be funded.
Mayor Haakenson asked Mr. Hertrich who made these claims to him. Mr. Hertrich said that was
privileged, confidential information.
Mayor Haakenson said if Mr. Hertrich was at the site today, Mossbrucker Construction, for whom Syd
Locke is the project manager, was doing the grading. Mr. Hertrich asked if the plans for grading, curb
cuts, etc. were available to the public. Mayor Haakenson answered yes.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 5
In response to Mr. Hertrich's concern with the amount spent for the Public Safety Complex, Mayor
Haakenson said to date the City had spent between 90% and 95% of the project cost for this phase of the
construction project and had not touched the moneys for the fire station on 196`' that would be
constructed in 2002. He commented new plans would be required for the fire station because the original
plans would not work on the site that was purchased. He emphasized the City has not overspent on the
Public Safety project although there would be significant legal fees. He acknowledged there had been
change orders but the responsibility for the change orders — whether the City's, the contractor's or the
architect's — would be decided in court. He said the total of the change orders and who was responsible
for them was privileged information due to lawsuits between the three parties.
Mr. Hertrich asked if the public could review that information. Mr. Snyder advised the submittals,
contracts, approved change orders and any public documents were available to the public. Much of the
accounting was prepared in anticipation of legal review and was not available for public review. Mr.
Hertrich said he was attempting to determine how much more the change orders would add to the
project, pointing out the citizens will ultimately pay for them.
Mayor Haakenson expressed frustration with a citizen making a comment without indicating where he
heard that information so that he (Mayor Haakenson) could talk to that individual. He invited Mr.
Hertrich to inform him later who he spoke with. Mayor Haakenson said he met with 12 neighbors on 5'h
Avenue, who were told by a Columbia Pacific employee (general contractor) that there would be no
landscaping on 5`'' Avenue because there was no money for it. He showed the neighbors the approved
plans and explained the plants were purchased two years ago and were now twice the size and created a
much better screen. He said this was representative of the type of false information that was being
spread around.
Regarding ADB review, Mr. Snyder said a Council Committee recently discussed the need to amend the
ADB plan to install a sculpture proposed by the IAFF.
Beverly Linn, on behalf of the Edmonds Police Foundation, reminded the community of the upcoming
Edmonds Edmonds Challenge on September 8 sponsored by the Edmonds Police Foundation, Edmonds Police
Challenge Youth Services and local businesses. She explained the Edmonds Challenge was a running/walking
/walkin
Run /Walk p g g g
Event event designed for family participation and had a 2 and 4 mile course. Registration fees were $20 in
advance, $25 at the event and $30 for a family of three or more. Refreshments and entertainment would
be provided. She ,invited anyone requiring additional information to contact Sgt. Debbie Smith. On
behalf of the Edmonds Police Foundation and Edmonds Youth Services, she thanked Mayor Haakenson
and Council President Pro Tem White for spending time on and in the dunk tank during the Taste of
Edmonds.
August 23 Elaine Hamner -Yard, 9209 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds, expressed her appreciation for receiving
Hearing notification in the mail of a hearing regarding church parking and traffic patterns scheduled for
Before the Wednesday, August 23 at 7:00 m. a City Hall third floor. She hoped all 23 churches in the City
Planning y� g Il• t � � l� t}'
Board Re: would have representatives present at the hearing as the reduction of seating in the church per parking
Church place was being discussed. She said the proposal was to reduce the current requirement of five people
Parking .
per car to three people per car.
U1Donna Randall, 841 Hendley Lane, Edmonds, said discussion at a recent Council meeting regarding
g the increased need for tax funds focused largely on the library. At earlier financial planning meetings in
U
the City, she had the impression that the need for increased funding would be spread over the fire and
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 6
police departments. She said tonight's discussion regarding a levy lid lift again appeared to be focused
on the library.
(Council agreed to allow Mr. Albano to speak for an additional three minutes as he believed he was
speaking under the public comment portion of the EAED discussion when he spoke previously.)
Appreciation Ray Albano, 20916 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, said this Council was the best thing to happen to
fMayor & Edmonds since he has lived here. Mr. Albano reminded the .attorneys to speak in a down -to -earth
Council manner. He was glad there was a woman on the Council, and he further expressed his appreciation to the
Mayor for his efforts.
Library In response to Mr. Everett's comments, Mayor Haakenson said although only five budget scenarios were
Funding presented at public meetings, there have been as many as 20 -25 scenarios under his consideration (with
the library paid from the General Fund and paid by other means) as well as other scenarios developed by
Councilmembers. He emphasized at this time, his intent was to have the library paid out of the General
Fund until he was informed differently.
Sno Isle 6. DISCUSSION ON SNO ISLE REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM RESOLUTION
Regional
Library Mayor Haakenson clarified this was discussion regarding a resolution prepared by Sno Isle Regional
Resolution Library Board of Trustees. He referred to a July 26, 2000 letter from Art Weeks, Director of the Sno Isle
Library, that outlined the District's intent to pursue annexation of all contract cities within the next five
years. He explained the letter was distributed to the Long Range Financial Task Force who directed
Council President Pro Tem White and him to meet with Mr. Weeks to discuss the Board's intention.
Council President Pro Tem White explained on July 26, 2000, the City received a letter indicating the
District's intention to move toward annexation of all contract cities. He said the Sno Isle Library
includes Snohomish County and Island County and includes libraries in many small cities. There are
currently nine cities supporting library services via contract rather than annexation. He explained
annexation was when a geographical region was integrated into the library system so that the library
board governed that area and imposed a tax to fund the library.
Council President Pro Tem White explained Sno Isle had concern with many issues including library
building ownership and the amount paid for library service and maintenance under existing contracts.
The intent of the Board was to create consistency and stability throughout the District as instability of
local funding creates instability throughout the library district. Council President Pro Tem White pointed
out this was illustrated by the discussions the Council has had regarding the concept of not funding the
library due to a lack of funds as a result of I -695 and how to eliminate that in the future.
Council President Pro Tem White explained that via annexation, Sno Isle charged a tax of $0.50 per
$1,000 of assessed valuation. Cities under contract pay a variable rate; Edmonds' rate was
approximately $0.38 per $1,000. He pointed out property values in Edmonds were significantly higher
than some other cities. Sno Isle has discussed how the $0.38 per $1,000 paid by Edmonds relates to the
$0.50 per $1,000 paid by cities such as Mountlake Terrace via annexation. He emphasized this was just
the beginning of the discussion with Sno Isle; the City was free to do whatever it wanted and Sno Isle
would continue to provide library services as they currently exist.
Councilmember Davis said the 5 -year period indicated in Sno Isle's letter as well as in the resolution
gave the appearance of an ultimatum. Council President Pro Tem White said the pursuit of annexation of
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 7
all contract cities within five years was the Sno Isle board's goal. He emphasized Sno Isle could not
dictate that the City annex, only the City can initiate a ballot measure for annexation.
Councilmember Orvis asked who appointed the Sno Isle Board. Mayor Haakenson advised there were
five appointees from Snohomish County and two from Island County. The members were appointed by
the County Executive and approved by the opposite County Council.
Councilmember Plunkett pointed out if the levy lid lift succeeded, the library stayed as it is.
Administrative Services Director Peggy Hetzler agreed. Councilmember Plunkett said if annexation was
successful, the library stayed the same. Ms. Hetzler agreed. Councilmember Plunkett asked if the
library would remain if a levy lid lift failed. Ms. Hetzler answered the physical library would remain,
how to fund it would be decided by the Council. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the existing
funding would remain in place if a levy lid lift failed. Ms. Hetzler answered yes. Councilmember
Plunkett asked if there had been any option discussed that would close the library. Ms. Hetzler answered
no. Councilmember Plunkett said it was important for everyone to understand the Council was
discussing funding mechanisms and not closing the library.
Councilmember Petso asked if there was a vacancy on the Sno Isle Board. Mayor Haakenson answered
yes. Councilmember Petso asked if a citizen from Edmonds would be eligible. Mayor Haakenson
answered yes. Councilmember Petso shared Council President Pro Tem White's concern with Sno Isle
billing the City based on valuation of homes and /or views. She asked if the Board had any plans to
develop a more reasonable method. Council President Pro Tem White said the Board would be more
than anxious to create a taskforce to examine equity among contract and annexed cities. He said it was a
complex issue because under the current contract, Edmonds paid the least of any other participating city
per $1,000 of assessed value; however, Edmonds' property values were. significantly higher than some
other participating cities.
Councilmember Orvis said annexation had several disadvantages. Because Edmonds property values
were higher than the surrounding area, the City could be taxed more than its share. He disagreed with
relinquishing taxing authority to a board that was not elected because accountability could not be
addressed. Further, if the City was taxed $0.50 per $1,000 via annexation, he said there was no
guarantee those funds would be returned to the Edmonds library. He was opposed to annexation and
favored an option that provided library service via a contract with Sno Isle. He said a levy lid lift would
stabilize funding and address Sno Isle's concerns regarding stability. He emphasized the citizens must
vote for a levy lid lift.
Mayor Haakenson asked if the assessment for 2001 had been received from Sno Isle. Ms. Hetzler said it
was estimated to be slightly under $1.1 million, the assessment for 2000 was slightly over $1 million, the
increase was approximately $70,0004100,000. She said the increase was based on Sno Isle's allowable
3% increase.
Mayor Haakenson restated a question posed by George Everett, "what incentive was there to vote in
favor of a levy lid lift if the library stayed in place even if it failed ?" Councilmember Plunkett answered
a levy lid lift would provide stability and ongoing funding for the library. Without dedicated funding, it
would be considered with all other possible issues that arose in the budget.
Council President Pro Tem White disagreed the library was entirely safe, pointing out the City had a
legal obligation to provide certain services. If costs continued to rise and revenues continued to
decrease, something would have to be eliminated and it could not be certain services. The purpose of a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 8
levy lid lift would be to dedicate funds to the library for as long as the levy lid lift was in effect. He said
the success of a levy lid lift would secure the library, failure would leave it in question.
7. REPORT ON AUDIO EQUIPMENT
Audio
Equipment Mayor Haakenson recalled this was the third time this item had been before the Council and noted all the
information was available for the Council to take action. He said the information provided by staff
clearly indicated they had .chosen not to purchase the newer technology due to the cost and assurance by
Lanier that they will provide the necessary support services.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
WHITE, TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO AUDIO VISUAL FRONTIERS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$49,047.37 INCLUDING SALES TAX AND AUTHORIZE FINANCE TO TRANSFER $50,000
FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND 119 TO FUND 326.
Council President Pro Tem White pointed out the last time the Council reviewed this, an issue arose
regarding the availability of newer technology that could store hours of information on a credit card sized
chip versus the current analog cassette tape system. Further analysis was done and it was determined the
newer technology costs thousands more and the City had been assured support would be provided for the
analog tapes technology for a long time.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
tility Rate 8. AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE UTILITY RATE STUDY WITH FINANCIAL
Study CONSULTING SOLUTIONS GROUP (FCSG) TO DEVELOP CAPITAL CONNECTION
CHARGES FOR THE WATER AND SEWER UTILITY FUNDS ($9.550)
Public Works Superintendent Noel Miller explained this was a proposal to study and develop "proposed"
capital connection charges. He said the concept was first proposed by Councilmember Petso earlier this
year and was previously discussed by Council committees and the Council. He explained the proposal
was to charge new development when they connected to the City's water and sewer systems as new
development takes water from the City's water system and adds to the existing sanitary sewer system
placing an incremental higher burden on the system that the current property owners have paid for over
the years. He said the intent would be to defray the cost of further capital replacement projects that the
City has discussed. He said the capital connection charge would also reduce the anticipated increase in
the sanitary sewer rates.
Mr. Miller said the City's existing rate consultant, Financial Consulting Solutions Group (FCSG), would
be used to develop proposed capital connection charges this fall if approved by Council. He explained
once FCSG completed the study, the Council could determine whether the charges were fair and whether
they should be implemented.
Councilmember Davis asked if the study would provide a recommendation regarding the amount of the
hook -up fee. Mr. Miller answered yes, explaining FCSG's study would be based on industry standard
methodology recognized by the State auditor but would be a study unique to Edmonds. Councilmember
Davis asked what the charge might be. Mr. Miller said $1,000 - $3,000 per multi- family or single family
residence.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 9 .
1
Councilmember Davis observed the average for both water and sewer hook -up would be approximately
$4,000. Mr. Miller said that was approximately the amount charged by other cities and districts in the
area. Councilmember Davis asked how much this would provide for capital needs. Mr. Miller answered
in the past, the City added approximately 100 new units per year; if a connection charge was
implemented, it would generate approximately $200,000 for sewer and $200,000 for water.
Councilmember Davis said implementing a connection charge would alleviate the need to significantly
raise rates. Mr. Miller said it would help but would not result in a significant reduction in the anticipated
increase in rates. He said sewer revenue needs in 2005 were approximately $1.6 million; the additional
revenue from the connection charge would reduce that to $1.4 million.
COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED,. SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM
WHITE, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO AMEND THE CURRENT UTILITY RATE STUDY
WITH FINANCIAL CONSULTING SOLUTION GROUP (FCSG) TO DEVELOP CONNECTION
CHARGES FOR THE WATER AND SEWER FUNDS PER THE ATTACHED PROPOSAL.
Councilmember Plunkett observed citizens could pay for water and sewer via rates or the City could
impose an impact fee on citizens. He was opposed to the City studying a capital connection charge due
to the resulting increase in housing costs. He pointed out the net profit for a builder was 5 %; the addition
of a $2,000 - $4,000 impact fee cut their profit in half, thus the buyer was obviously the one who would
pay the fee. He said the connection charge contradicted the State's GMA which requires urban areas to
encourage affordable, available housing. The City's Comprehensive Plan requires the City to encourage
affordable available housing. He said the cost of the connection charge was hidden and would be
amortized over 30 years, ultimately costing $13,500 over the life of the mortgage for new construction or
a person refurbishing a home. He said the cost was not only hidden but grew over time.
Councilmember Plunkett observed the impact fee was a triple tax. A buyer paid when they purchased a
home, they paid via rates, and paid excise tax when selling their home. He said the impact fee was also
passed on to other citizens via increased valuations. The impact fee artificially inflated the value of a
home, resulting in increased assessments in surrounding homes and thus increased taxes. He said those
who would pay the impact fee already pay a considerable amount to the City via an excise tax that
generates $740,000 for Fund 125 which funds numerous citywide projects.
Councilmember Plunkett recalled an immigrant family's attempts to purchase a home near Meadowdale
High and their ultimate failure because they were $3,000 short of the price the owner would accept. He
pointed out this family's ability to purchase a home would be further impacted by a connection charge.
He said the impact fee artificially increased the cost. of housing and was, therefore, unfair, hidden,
exceedingly expensive, a broad -based tax and triple taxation on those who already pay taxes. He was
opposed to even studying a connection charge as the Council's policy was to encourage affordable
housing.
Councilmember Petso asked if the impact fee would apply to any home purchased or sold in the City or
if it applied only to new construction. Mr. Miller answered it applied to only new construction or
redevelopment that added more units to a property. Councilmember Petso said if the family
Councilmember Plunkett referred to was purchasing from existing housing stock, they would not be
paying the connection charge. Mr. Miller agreed an existing house would not pay the connection charge.
Councilmember Petso said the Municipal Research Services Center (MRSC) web page included a
discussion of how impact fees related to affordable housing. She said according to GMA and MRSC, it
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 10
was well recognized that this was not a housing affordability issue and the City would not be out of
compliance with any statute because if the costs were not paid via impact fees, the new family would pay
via rates. The decision was whether to subsidize growth via rates or imposing an impact fee that was
calculated to produce equity between existing and future residents. She said the formula was designed to
prevent existing residences from subsidizing growth; if the impact fee was not implemented, existing
residents would be subsidizing growth
Councilmember Orvis said he would vote in opposition to the proposal for many of the same reasons
cited by Councilmember Plunkett. He said it was important to understand that the impact fee would be
amortized over 30 years.
Councilmember Davis said he would support the motion, pointing out young families have the potential
for income growth and possibly increased ability to pay over time versus the City raising rates on the
elderly community, many of whom are on fixed incomes. He pointed out the connection charge was
"pay for service," for a system that needed to be expanded to accommodate new service which was not
currently being done.
Council President Pro Tem White stated the purpose of the study was to determine what amount would
be appropriate for a hook -up fee as well as any impacts the charge might have on prospective purchasers
and contractors.
UPON ROLL CALL, THE MOTION CARRIED (3 -2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WHITE,
COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO AND DAVIS IN FAVOR, AND COUNCILMEMBERS PLUNKETT
AND ORVIS OPPOSED.
9. REPORT ON COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Community Community Service/Developmental Services
Services/ Council President Pro Tem White said the committee discussed the concerns of the police and fire
Dev.
Services department regarding the practice of allowing private roads to be developed in subdivisions and plats.
Committee Those concerns included traffic safety issues and lack of assurance that these roads were maintained to
emergency response standards. Staff would like a requirement that private roads not be allowed in new
developments of five lots or more. This threshold was identified because it was the difference between
short subdivisions (four lots) and formal plats (five lots or more). The committee directed staff to
develop code revisions and standards to require all future roads servicing five or more single family lots
be designated as . "public" and bring to the full Council for discussion and adoption. In addtion, the
committee discussed developer impact fees which was addressed by the Council as Agenda Item 8.
Next, Council President Miller invited Al Dykes, the owner of the "old Safeway property" to speak to the
committee regarding a proposal for a joint private /public development on that site. After considerable
discussion, it was decided that Councilmembers White and Petso would meet with Port officials, City
staff and Mr. Dykes to study the feasibility of this project.
The fourth item discussed by the committee was a request by the Fire Department to place a privately
funded firefighter memorial at Fire Station 17 in the new Public Safety Complex. The artwork was
proposed to be placed on the site that was currently designated for public art. Council President Pro Tem
White explained there was currently no process to add /change public art. The committee's original
direction was to direct staff to further refine . a process in which the applicant would submit information
to the Arts Commission and Parks and Recreation Department followed by an application to the ADB for
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 11
approval of placement-at a public meeting of a firefighter memorial at Fire Station 17. Council President
Pro Tem White said he now wanted to expand that to direct staff to define a process that would allow the
ADB, Arts Commission, Parks and Recreation, and representation from the Council and staff to
determine what do when a proposal would impact public art such as creating a public art zone in the
areas where public art was located.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM WHITE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
DAVIS, TO DIRECT STAFF TO CREATE A PROPOSAL /PROCESS TO DETERMINE WHAT
TO DO WHEN A PROPOSAL IMPACTED ESTABLISHED PUBLIC ART.
Councilmember Plunkett preferred this be placed on a future Council agenda so that more written
information could be provided. Council President Pro Tern White pointed out the Fire Department
wanted to move forward with the project. He reiterated the need for the City to establish a process to
address such proposals.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Public Public Safety G
Safety Councilmember Plunkett advised the committee discussed and reviewed changes to the animal control
Committee ordinance and recommended the revised Animal Control Ordinance be placed on a future consent
agenda. The committee discussed a proposal by Chief Hickok to utilize the PRISIM Firearms Training
System (a computerized shooting range) due to the difficulty in providing realistic combat shooting
scenarios as a result of the closure of two local shooting ranges. The committee recommended the
PRISIM Firearms Training System be considered by the Council on a future agenda.
The committee discussed emergency medical services, specifically four questions raised at the July 18'
Council meeting that needed further review from staff. Administrative Services Director Peggy Hetzler
will respond regarding cost controls (question 1). The committee agreed to write to Lynnwood Council
President Gough to inquire whether Proposal A would affect level of service (question 2). Mayor
Haakenson provided information in the Council packet regarding Medic 7's budget for the past five years
(question 3). In response to the fourth question, Fire Chief Tomberg indicated a medic attached to a fire
unit downtown would have a faster response time to certain areas of the city than the medic unit at the
hospital.
Long Range Financial Task Force
Long Range Councilmember Orvis reported Administrative Services Director Pe Hetzler was asked to bring
Financial p Peggy g
Task Force information regarding cost controls to the next Task Force meeting. Councilmember White and Mayor
Haakenson were asked to meet with the Sno Isle Library System Director regarding clarification of the
district's plans to seek annexation of all contract cities by 2005. Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene was
asked to provide information regarding roof needs. Councilmember Orvis indicated he would like
Council direction on using Fund 125 for some building replacement needs and options for evaluation of
the library roof.
Finance I Finance Committee
committee Councilmember Orvis reported the committee discussed storm drainage utility rates and recommended a
full presentation of stormwater rates be presented to the Council.
10. MAYOR'S REPORT
lie Mayor Haakenson explained the contractor for the Public Safety Complex was suing the City and the
ety
I-,o'- m plex architect, and the City counter -sued the contractor and architect. Consequently, if one talks to anyone
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
Page 12
associated with the contractor, he would say the architect wrote bad plans and it was the City's fault for
accepting the plans. The architect would say the plans were fine but the contractor was not doing a good
job. Mayor Haakenson emphasized the bottom line for him was getting the construction project finished.
He said he did not accept anything the contractor or architect said at face value and neither should
anyone in the City. He encouraged residents with questions to call him or visit his office. He said it was
unfortunate when a citizen made claims during the public comment portion of the meeting that they were
unable to back up.
August 12 Mayor Haakenson thanked the four members of the Council who assisted with interviews for the two
Special City vacant director positions. He said the interviews were advertised as a Council meeting but no one from
Council '
Meeting / the public chose to attend. After interviewing the candidates for each position, the Council adjourned to
Executive an adjoining room to provide him their thoughts regarding the qualifications of the candidates.
Session Technically because the Council adjourned to an adjoining room, they held an Executive Session but it
Was not announced as an Executive Session. Although no one from the public was in attendance, upon
the advice of the City Attorney, Mayor Haakenson explained he was making this announcement.
11. COUNCIL REPORTS
Port of Council President Pro Tem White advised the Port of Edmonds was moving forward with their long
Edmonds range plans and would be inviting public participation in the near future. He encouraged the public to
participate as the Port was a vital entity and controlled a significarit portion of the waterfront. The Port
recently resolved an ongoing easement issue. Negotiations with Unocal resulted in relocating the
easement from its former location that ran through the stacked storage and prevented boat storage in that
area.
Councilmember Petso recognized Mrs. Yard's efforts that resulted in staff addressing private versus
Recognition public roads. Councilmember Petso pointed out citizen involvement could produce results that were
f Citizen p p p
Involvement good for all citizens. She recognized the Wassalls, expressing her thanks to them for their involvement
related to the proposed fencing on Sunset Avenue. She summarized it was a lot of work to be involved
and she appreciated their efforts.
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
ARY V KENSON, MAYOR SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 15, 2000
.Page 13
1
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Plaza Meeting Room - Library Building
650 Main Street
7:00 -10:00 p.m.
AUGUST 15, 2000
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 8, 2000
(C) APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #41307 THROUGH #42926 FOR THE WEEK OF AUGUST 7, 2000, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $590,424.54.
(D) APPROVAL OF FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON AUGUST 1, 2000 ON
THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE APPLICATION BY INES ANGIONO-
.. FOURNO, ET. AL. TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES FROM RM -3 TO RM -1.5. THE
REZONE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING PROPERTIES: 533, 539, 551, 553, 558, 560, 561, 563, 565, 570,
572, 580, 582, 588, AND 590 ELM WAY; AND 1122 6.. AVENUE SOUTH (File No. R -99 -231)
(E) PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF NATIONAL HEALTH CENTER WEEK, AUGUST 20 -26, 2000
3. (15 Min.) PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 3317, THE TITLE OF WHICH READS: AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REPEALING SECTION 20.91.030
CONTINUANCES, REENACTING SUCH SECTION 20.91.030 CONTINUANCES AS AN INTERIM
ZONING REGULATION, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE
4. (15 Min.) PRESENTATION BY THE EDMONDS ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3 Minute Limit Per Person)
6. (20 Min.) DISCUSSION ON SNO ISLE REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM RESOLUTION
7. (5 Min.) REPORT ON AUDIO EQUIPMENT
8. (10 Min.) AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE UTILITY RATE STUDY WITH FINANCIAL CONSULTING
SOLUTIONS GROUP (FCSG) TO DEVELOP CAPITAL CONNECTION CHARGES FOR THE WATER
AND SEWER UTILITY FUNDS ($9,550)
9. (15 Min.) REPORT ON COMMITTEE MEETINGS
10. ( 5 Min.) MAYOR'S REPORT
11 (15 Min.) COUNCIL REPORTS
Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771 -0245 with 24 hours advance
notice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 46. Delayed telecast of this meeting
appears the following Wednesday at noon and 7: 00 p.m., as well as, Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 46.