The URL can be used to link to this page

2008.03.04 CC Agenda Packet AGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds ______________________________________________________________ March 4, 2008 6:00 p.m. - Executive session regarding labor negotiation and real estate negotiation. Executive sessions are closed to the public. 6:30 p.m. - Interview candidates for appointment to the Historic Preservation and Sister City Commissions. The interviews are open to the public. 7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute 1.Approval of Agenda 2.Approval of Consent Agenda Items A.Roll Call B. AM-1434 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 26, 2008. C. AM-1437 Approval of claim checks #102525 through #102703 in the amount of $779,669.69 issued February 28, 2008. D. AM-1427 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #2. Approved for the consent agenda by the Public Safety Committee on 02-12-08. E. AM-1433 Authorization to call for bids for the decorative illumination portion of the SR99 International District Enhancement project. This consent agenda item was not reviewed by a Council Committee. F. AM-1436 Authorization for Mayor to sign Recreational Services Ageement with the South County Senior Center. This consent agenda item was not reviewed by a Council Committee. 3. AM-1438 (30 Min) Public Hearing on the City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Program. 4. AM-1439 (15 Min) Public Hearing on Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 3679 amending the definition of Local Public Facilities in ECDC 21.55.007. 5.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 6. AM-1415 (15 Min) Discussion and potential action regarding the 2009 Edmonds City Council Retreat. 7. (5 Min)Mayor's Comments 8. (15 Min)Council Comments 9.Adjourn Packet Page 1 of 158 AM-1434 2.B. Approval of 02-26-08 City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 26, 2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 02-26-08 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 09:04 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/28/2008 09:09 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 03:15 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 02/28/2008 09:02 AM Final Approval Date: 02/28/2008 Packet Page 2 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 26, 2008 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Gary Haakenson, Mayor Michael Plunkett, Council President Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember Steve Bernheim, Councilmember D. J. Wilson, Councilmember Deanna Dawson, Councilmember Dave Orvis, Councilmember Ron Wambolt, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Dan Clements, Administrative Services Director Kathleen Junglov, Asst. Admin. Services Dir. Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief Rob Chave, Planning Manager Debi Humann, Human Resources Manager Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Wambolt requested Item D be removed from the Consent Agenda and Council President Plunkett requested Item E be removed. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A, B AND C. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 2008. C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #102396 THROUGH #102524 IN THE AMOUNT OF $363,450.68 ISSUED FEBRUARY 21, 2008, AND APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #46231 THROUGH #46274 FOR THE PERIOD OF FEBRUARY 1 - FEBRUARY 15, 2008 IN THE AMOUNT OF $788,892.17. ITEM D: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF EDMONDS CITY CODE 4.72.030; ELIMINATING THE FIFTEEN DAY REQUIREMENT FOR A DECISION ON A BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION; AND ESTABLISHING GENERAL CRITERIA FOR DENIAL OF A BUSINESS LICENSE. For Councilmember Wambolt, City Attorney Scott Snyder explained he recommended this change in 2006 after a liquor license required a very lengthy process for approval. Councilmember Wambolt Packet Page 3 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 2 observed the existing 15 day requirement for a decision had been effective for 43 years and questioned how often the time limit had been exceeded. Mr. Snyder responded that a survey on MSRC indicated Kirkland had a 15-day limit; the majority of cities surveyed did not have a time limit and those that did were in the range of 30-45 days. He noted when a liquor license was involved, the delay was often not caused by the City but the Liquor Control Board. He noted in the Tupper case, the license application was submitted shortly after the Council’s resolution regarding “quail-gate.” As this license involved the keeping of another wild bird, staff took time to review the animal control regulations. He noted those were two situations in the past two years that had taken longer than 15 days. Mr. Snyder noted if the City was not in compliance with its requirements, it would be difficult to prosecute a business owner for operating without a license. The ordinance also established criteria for denial which was currently lacking. He recommended establishing a time limit longer than 15 days. City Clerk Sandy Chase noted the City Clerk’s office coordinates approval of business licenses by various departments; key departments include Planning, Building, Fire and Police. She noted delays were usually due to zoning or need for special permits. The intent of a business license was to ensure code compliance. Mr. Snyder remarked the 15-day time limit was also difficult with the limited number of staff in Edmonds; in comparison, Kirkland who also has a 15-day limit, has approximately 2½ times the number of staff. He offered to include a number other than 15 days or include a procedure for extension. Councilmember Bernheim suggested the matter be referred to a Council Committee to determine whether an update was necessary. He inquired about the number of business licenses the City processed per month. Ms. Chase answered there were approximately 2,000 business licenses in the City and the City received approximately 300 new applications per year. Mr. Snyder commented in the time since this ordinance of the 1930s, due process laws particularly regarding denials had changed dramatically, thus the inclusion of more process in the ordinance. COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. Council President Plunkett expressed interest in either a longer period of time or a process for an extension. Councilmember Dawson agreed with the suggestion to refer to the matter to Council Committee. She commented on the importance of expedited handling of business licenses to encourage businesses to locate in Edmonds. She favored a provision that would allow an extension in extraordinary circumstances. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM E: CONFIRMATION OF NEWLY APPOINTED HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS. Council President Plunkett advised last week the Council interviewed Susan Bauer and Larry Vogel for appointment to the Historic Preservation Commission. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT, TO CONFIRM THE APPOINTMENT OF SUSAN BAUER AND LARRY VOGEL TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM ABSTAINED. Packet Page 4 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 3 3. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mike Cooper, Snohomish County Councilmember, advised he was attending the Council meeting in keeping with the commitment he made during his campaign to maintain open communications with City Councils and junior taxing districts like Fire and Water Districts. He was available for conversations regarding how decisions the Snohomish County Council would be making would affect Edmonds including land use decisions in the City’s annexation areas particularly land use decisions in an area to the south where the City provides fire protection, Pt. Wells. He recognized decisions the County Council made in the City’s urban growth areas affected Edmonds residents and it was his belief that the County should have discussions with cities regardless of the decision the State Legislature made regarding the GMA. He looked forward to working hard to ensure the City passed the proposed EMS levy. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, corrected information he provided previously regarding the Senior Center boardmember elections, advising the election was March 12 and a Meet the Candidate meeting was scheduled for March 5 at 1:00 p.m. With regard to the code rewrite, he pointed out decisions on items that were moved into Chapter 6 could be made without a public hearing and requested the Council hold a public hearing on any items proposed to be moved into Chapter 6. He objected to several of the changes, finding the overhaul of the code was extreme and likely further than the Council wanted to go. He objected to restrictions on homeowners, citing a requirement for a road to a woodpile to allow access by a fire truck. He summarized many of the requirements were ridiculous and were an imposition of rules and regulations on average citizens that would result in a revolt; a revolt he would lead. Council President Plunkett asked Councilmember Cooper what the Snohomish County Council had accomplished in the past two months and upcoming issues. Snohomish County Councilmember Cooper reported he was elected Vice Chair of the Council and was looking forward to improving relationships between the Council and the Executive. He remarked County government was all about land use; there are numerous issues on the upcoming dockets, primarily in rural areas but he anticipated subdivisions and fully contained communities would be highly controversial issues. He anticipated the Planning Commission would soon be forwarding urban design standards to the Council regarding land use in cities’ UGAs which would address LDMRs. He reported on ongoing efforts related to housing, homelessness, and preserving mobile home parks, the last unsubsidized low income housing option. He noted here were also a number of Public Works issues including Transportation Benefit Districts (TBD). Councilmember Olson thanked Councilmember Cooper for attending the City Council meeting. She recalled one of the biggest issues at the South Snohomish Cities group was poor communication between the County Council and City Councils. Councilmember Cooper commented he planned to attend City Council meetings periodically and encouraged the City to invite him to attend Council work sessions where he could be of assistance on specific agenda items. Councilmember Wilson recalled the Edmonds City Council’s discussion at their retreat regarding forming a TBD in south Snohomish County and asked what that could look like and whether there were any potential pitfalls. Councilmember Cooper was unsure what the TBD would look like. He noted through Snohomish County Tomorrow discussions at the staff level, cities were asked to express interest in forming a TBD; one more city was required to meet the population threshold and then the County Council would make a decision whether to move forward with forming a countywide TBD. Although it was an appropriate discussion, he found the timing unfortunate as several large decisions would need to be made by May to form a countywide TBD. He was unsure whether the County would move forward with a countywide TBD; if they did, he anticipated a great deal of work would be required to determine what projects to put on the ballot, etc. Packet Page 5 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 4 Councilmember Wilson observed Snohomish County Councilmembers Somers and Sullivan had provided a great deal of leadership on environmental stewardship issues in the past. He recalled approximately three years ago the Conservation Futures revenue was reduced by approximately half, funds that cities could use to purchase property to protect land, etc. He requested the County Council consider increasing that to an optimal level. Councilmember Cooper advised Conservation Futures was a high priority of his and he planned to continue pursuing that financing method. Councilmember Orvis expressed interest in proceeding with a TBD. Councilmember Cooper advised now that cities have expressed interest in forming a TBD, the County Council and Executive would need to determine next steps. When he took office in January there had not yet been any discussion at Council Committee regarding whether to move forward with forming a TBD; the next steps would be to have local elected leaders discuss with the Public Works Committee what they envisioned. If the TBD was countywide, cities could expect 56% of the funds to be spent in cities and the remainder in unincorporated areas due to the rough split of car registrations inside and outside cities. A countywide TBD would also require development and approval of Interlocal Agreements with all cities by May. Councilmember Dawson also thanked Councilmember Cooper for attending the meeting, noting because she works with him at Snohomish County, she had had conversations with him regarding TBD and other topics. She appreciated his willingness to partner and build bridges with cities and found it a great benefit to have him on the County Council. 4. DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE MAY 20, 2008 SPECIAL ELECTION OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) LEVY LID LIFT TO RESTORE THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX BY APPROXIMATELY $.18 ($1.7 MILLION) TO THE ORIGINALLY AUTHORIZED LEVEL OF $.50 PER $1,000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION; AND SUPPLYING A BALLOT TITLE LIMITING THE USE OF THE LEVY TO EMS PURPOSES. Mayor Haakenson advised the resolution had a great deal of input from staff and the City Attorney’s Office. In response to Councilmember Wambolt’s request, the resolution included a dollar amount as well as the cents per thousand. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1166. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The resolution approved reads as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE MAY 20, 2008 SPECIAL ELECTION OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) LEVY LID LIFT TO RESTORE THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX BY APPROXIMATELY $.18 ($1.7 MILLION) TO THE ORIGINALLY AUTHORIZED LEVEL OF $.50 PER $1,000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION; AND SUPPLYING A BALLOT TITLE LIMITING THE USE OF THE LEVY TO EMS PURPOSES. 5. DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION REGARDING A PROPOSED RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) LEVY LID LIFT.* THE PROPOSITION BALLOT TITLE READS AS FOLLOWS: SHALL THE CITY OF EDMONDS RESTORE ITS CURRENT EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES TAX LEVY RATE TO THE ORIGINALLY VOTER-AUTHORIZED TOTAL TAX LEVY OF $.50 PER $1,000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION RESTORING APPROXIMATELY $.18 ($1.7 MILLION) AND INCREASE THE LEVY EACH YEAR THEREAFTER AS ALLOWED BY Packet Page 6 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 5 CHAPTER 84.55 RCW? THIS PROPOSITION IS NOT AN EXCESS LEVY AND IS SUBJECT TO OTHERWISE APPLICABLE STATUTORY LIMITS. SHOULD THIS PROPOSITION BE APPROVED? YES OR NO *PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE RECEIVED BOTH PRO AND CON REGARDING THIS PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT Mayor Haakenson invited public comment. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide comment. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM, FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 1167. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The resolution approved reads as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REQUESTING THE VOTERS SUPPORT A PROPOSITION TO RESTORE THE CITY’S EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES LEVY TO $.50 PER $1,000 OF ASSESSED VALUATION. 6. ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE SALARY RANGES FOR NON-REPRESENTED AND EXEMPT PERSONNEL FOR BUDGET YEAR 2008. Human Resources Manager Debi Humann reviewed the four areas covered by the Annual Compensation Ordinance: 1. Section 1.1 details the updated 2008 Hourly Employee Wage Schedule and accompanying pay grade and title sheets (Exhibit A). She advised the Hourly Employee Wage Schedule was updated annually based on the Washington State minimum wage law. In addition, the titles of hourly positions were reviewed annually and minor changes made. 2. Section 1.2 of the ordinance includes the updated 2008 Non-Represented Employee Pay Schedule (Exhibit B). She recalled non-represented compensation had been the subject of much debate over the past three years. Last year the Council approved a new Non-Represented Employee Policy (NRC). Per the NRC policy, the pay schedule was updated annually through a survey process. The proposed 2008 non-represented employee pay schedule reflects the results of the survey as well as a 3.5% COLA. 3. Section 1.3 of the ordinance authorizes the Mayor to approve merit increases for non-represented employees based on anniversary dates within the band established in compliance with the NRC compensation policy. She noted although this was not a new practice, the ordinance establishes the method by which merit increases are provided. 4. Section 1.4 gives authority to the Mayor to provide additional compensation to non-represented employees who were doing their job along with the duties of an additional vacant position for a period exceeding 30 days. Ms. Humann advised the ordinance was reviewed by the Finance Committee at their February 12 meeting and was recommended for review by the full Council. Council President Plunkett asked whether the provision that allowed the Mayor to provide additional compensation under certain circumstances was reviewed by the Finance Committee. Ms. Humann answered yes. Finance Committee member Councilmember Wambolt recalled Mayor Haakenson informed the Committee he would make the proposal to the Council. Ms. Humann agreed it was not included in the ordinance considered by the Finance Committee but it was discussed. City Attorney Scott Snyder advised he drafted the section last week. Packet Page 7 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 6 Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the Finance Committee members felt that issue had been adequately discussed. Councilmember Wambolt did not recall there was any discussion; the concept was introduced but there was no discussion between Committee members. Mayor Haakenson recalled there was a reporter in the audience and it was decided not to go into detail so that it was not reported in the newspaper before the Council had an opportunity to consider it. Mr. Snyder explained both the union contracts and the City’s personnel manual had a similar process when an employee was covering two jobs or working out of class; however, there was nothing similar at the director level. Ms. Humann advised the current City policy and collective bargaining allowed for an additional increase for a staff member working in their position who took on a supervisory role or duties of higher pay grade. She noted at the non-represented level, it was becoming more common that staff were doing their full-time job as well as taking on additional positions that may not be at a higher salary level with no way to provide any compensation. She commented the proposed additional compensation was intended to reward employees performing two jobs in excess of 30 days. Mr. Snyder commented the Economic Development Director position had been vacant for a substantial period of time and Stephen Clifton had been covering that position as well as Community Development Director. As a non-represented employee, he did not receive overtime and worked a substantial number of hours. He noted a public employee could not be provided a bonus and could not be compensated retroactively. Ms. Humann pointed out repeated efforts to fill the Economic Development Director position had been unsuccessful. Councilmember Bernheim observed currently directors who worked additional hours were not compensated. Ms. Humann agreed. Mr. Snyder explained for employees covered by collective bargaining that issue was addressed by the contract. A non-represented employee not at a director level was covered by the City’s personnel policies; director’s compensation was established in bands in the annual salary ordinance. Absent Council authorization, there was no way to provide additional compensation. Councilmember Bernheim asked about comp time. Mr. Snyder answered comp time was applicable only to those covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act and receive additional compensation. At a director level the individual works as much or as little as necessary to perform his job; in this situation the person is covering two jobs, working in excess of 40 hours per week and there was no way to compensate him. Councilmember Bernheim clarified his questions were in no way related to the specific staff member, only the ordinance which could apply in other instances. Mayor Haakenson clarified this situation had only arisen twice in the past ten years, both in the last two months. Ms. Humann reiterated this would only apply to a person doing their own job plus another position for a period of over 30 days. Council President Plunkett observed the policy exists in concept but not for directors. Mr. Snyder agreed. Mayor Haakenson clarified it existed for union bargain units but not non-represented employees. Councilmember Wambolt referred to the comment that a director was not being compensated for working additional hours and not receiving comp time. Ms. Humann advised directors did not accumulate comp time. Mr. Snyder advised exempt employees’ salaries could not be docked; they performed their job or were subject to discharge. Councilmember Wambolt did not object to compensating a person temporarily assuming a higher level position. In this instance, if the person in question were provided an additional 5%, they would be the second highest paid employee in the City, above the Police Chief. He noted the Economic Development Director position and Community Services Director position had only one person reporting to it. Packet Page 8 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 7 Observing that the additional 5% would result in a salary of over $130,000/year, he found that inappropriate and he would not support it. Ms. Humann pointed out an advantage was the City was not paying a salary for both positions. Councilmember Wambolt assured he had nothing against the individual, noting there was likely not a finer employee, but there were only 24 hours in a day to perform his job duties. Councilmember Bernheim commented if the City could not afford an Economic Development Director, that position should be eliminated and if the position was essential, the City should find the money to fund it. He was willing to approve the ordinance, referring Section 1.4 to the Finance Committee for further vetting such as regarding the issue of comp time. He suggested the Council could also approve Section 1.4 with a 3-month sunset provision and in the meantime refer the issue to the Finance Committee. Councilmember Wilson commented according to the pay grade and title, an Intern was paid more than a Crime Prevention Officer Assistant and the Chief Information Officer and Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisor were included in the same band. He observed the City did not seem to have a good sense of what the market paid and based on feedback from staff, the City was not keeping pace with private industry and was doing more with less such as the Community Services Director doing his job as well as the Economic Development Director duties. He asked whether this was a symptom of a larger problem that needed to be addressed. Mayor Haakenson commented he was amazed at the amount of time spent discussing the non-represented employees’ pay when there were 43 non-represented employees compared to 282 total employees. He noted approximately 240 of City employees were covered by union contracts which the Council approves. Staff has developed different ways over the years of conducting salary surveys to ensure the City was paying comparable salaries which he believed the City was, and the Council’s policy had been to pay in the mid-range. With regard to Councilmember Bernheim’s comment regarding whether an Economic Development Director was needed, Mayor Haakenson explained the Council made a decision to fill the Economic Development Director position, it was a budgeted position, and there was no argument that the City could not afford the position; it was simply that a satisfactory candidate had not been identified and the approximately $100,000 salary had not been paid for the past two years. The proposal was to pay an already overworked employee approximately $5,000 to do a second job. He noted last week the Council allocated that much to fund the 2-1-1 call center. Mayor Haakenson emphasized those 43 people were dedicated, quality employees who were doing their job for far less than they could get if they worked elsewhere. The approximately $5,000 increase for the period of time that person did both jobs was well worth the savings of not filling the position and he did an amazing job. It was a temporary situation; if it were to become permanent, the job description would need to be rewritten. He summarized the position was funded in the budget and having the employee do both jobs saved the taxpayers approximately $90,000 a year. He agreed the City’s employees did more than employees in other cities, noting Lynnwood had 150 more employees and 10,000 fewer citizens. He emphasized the employees were the City’s most valuable commodity and they deserved to be paid fairly; without them, nothing would be accomplished. Councilmember Wilson assured there was no question of the value of Mr. Clifton to the City and $5,000 was well worth the cost, noting hiring someone would cost much more than the proposed 5%. He was supportive of the ordinance, but had underlying concerns. For example although he had participated in Executive Session regarding contract negotiations, he felt what was presented was fait accompli. He acknowledged the City’s staff was the best, did more with less and deserved to be paid adequately and if the administration felt they needed to be paid more, he would support that including working to pass the EMS levy. He noted even if the EMS levy passed, the City would not have sufficient revenue to fund Packet Page 9 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 8 services beyond the next biennium which likely would require a general property tax increase, utility tax increases or service reductions. With regard to comp time, Mayor Haakenson explained if a Director worked 48-50 hours one week and asked to take Friday off, he approved it. He acknowledged that could be considered comp time but he considered it a balancing act. Councilmember Bernheim commented the proposal was not an increase for Mr. Clifton; if that was the intent, it should be worded in that manner. The proposal was a blanket authorization to the Mayor to provide additional compensation when multiple jobs were performed. He noted he voted against the funding for 2-1-1 and regretted he did not vote against the $250,000 for a consultant on the Transportation Comprehensive Plan. He wanted to ensure this blanket power was adequately vetted by Council Committee. He did not recall any Council discussion when Mr. Clifton assumed the duties of the Economic Development Director nor was it conditioned on a pay increase. Mayor Haakenson answered there was little point referring the matter to committee when all seven Councilmembers were present and staff was available to discuss the matter. He pointed out although Councilmember Bernheim was not comfortable with providing the Mayor that power in an unusual circumstance, that was the Mayor’s responsibility and the Council should be confident he would use it as intended. Councilmember Bernheim noted his question regarding comp time had been answered two different ways. Mayor Haakenson answered although it was not called comp time, it worked like comp time. Mr. Snyder advised compensatory time under the Fair Labor Standards Act had a very technical meaning; it was money in the bank that could be cashed out at any time and was subject to taxation. What Mayor Haakenson and Councilmember Wambolt were discussing was an exempt employee not entitled to overtime being given flexibility in their hours. He noted an employee could not be paid retroactively outside a union contract. One of the reasons this arose was the situation was unanticipated because it has been assumed the Economic Development Director position would have been filled by now. COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3680. Councilmember Dawson commented there were two items in the ordinance; the first was approval of the pay grades for non-represented employees. The information provided indicated the rates were comparable to other organizations and she found it appropriate for the Council to approve those pay rates. With regard to the second issue, allowing the Mayor to provide a 5% interest to a director working out of class, she found it appropriate to institute such a policy rather than acting on a case-by-case basis. She noted represented positions working out of class were paid for the position they were performing. The current situation was unusual in that the employee was performing two jobs, one of which paid less than his current salary. She noted there were two ways to address the situation, 1) the work of the Economic Development Director was not done, noting the Council has agreed they wanted the work of the Economic Development Director done, or 2) eliminate the Economic Development Director position. She found it appropriate the additional 5% would not be paid until the person was performing the additional job for 30 days, noting employees at the executive level often helped out with other positions; however, it was appropriate to compensate an employee expected to perform two jobs for an extended period of time. She summarized the Economic Development Director was an important position for the City to fund and it was appropriate to compensate someone in the interim for doing two jobs. Councilmember Olson commented on the importance of someone doing the Economic Development Director job, acting as the liaison between businesses and the City and new businesses resulted in increased revenues. Packet Page 10 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 9 For Councilmember Wambolt, Mayor Haakenson assured Mr. Clifton had not requested the additional compensation and in fact knew nothing about it as he was on vacation. Mayor Haakenson explained although Mr. Clifton may benefit from the policy, the reason it was proposed was to provide additional compensation when appropriate. Councilmember Wambolt commented there was nothing more emotional for employees than the fairness of their compensation. He noted the amount of Council discussion regarding this issue was not the amount of money but the principle. He pointed out a person earning $130,000 a year was not paid for the hours they worked; they were paid for their skills. He could support the proposal if it was to compensate a person performing a higher level position such as when the Assistant Police Chief performed the duties of the Police Chief. Councilmember Wilson commented their may be some broader policy issues related to personnel and fairness that the Finance Committee may want to discuss. He found the proposed policy sufficiently narrow, empowering the Mayor with another tool, noting he trusted Mayor Haakenson and a majority of the citizens trusted him. Councilmember Dawson commented she was not suggesting that an executive level employee be paid by the hour; she was recognizing that it would take an executive doing two jobs longer to do both jobs well and therefore additional compensation was appropriate. She noted few people could do two executive positions well or do them at the same time. For those who could, it was appropriate to provide them additional compensation. She noted the City had the tools to pay an employee working above their level but not for an employee performing two separate jobs at the same time for over 30 days. Council President Plunkett observed since neither of the two Finance Committee members indicated the process violated the responsibilities of the Committee, he would support the motion. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT AND COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON, WILSON AND DAWSON IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BERNHEIM, ORVIS AND WAMBOLT OPPOSED. The ordinance approved reads as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 3680 OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE SALARY RANGES FOR NON-REPRESENTED AND EXEMPT PERSONNEL FOR BUDGET YEAR 2008, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. 7. VERIZON FRANCHISE - CONSORTIUM City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the City’s franchise with Comcast for cable television expired in three years; therefore, under federal statute the City was entering the three year negotiation period, a process that could be formal or informal. Comcast is a Section 6 cable provider under the Telecommunications Act that also offers Section 2 phone services as part of their triple-play service. Verizon is in the process of installing fiber throughout the region and the nation to offer the same triple- play service and will be a Section 2 telephone company offering Section 6 cable communication service. Under new FCC regulations, cities are required to have in place a 90-day process for competitive franchises. When Verizon files an application the City will have 90 days to consider their application; therefore, any decisions regarding process were extremely time sensitive. He noted a competitive situation was one in which there was already an existing cable franchisee, in this case Comcast. Under level playing field requirements, when Verizon files an application, they are entitled to a franchise. Therefore, although the City was about to renegotiate their franchise with Comcast, Verizon would get the same franchise. He noted this was occurring in a very unstable setting; every year over the past three years the Telecommunications Act has been under scrutiny in Congress and cynics believe it would have Packet Page 11 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 10 passed but for the election year needs of candidates enjoying lobbying contributions that represented the largest amount ever contributed to any congressional act under consideration. Mr. Snyder advised Mr. Clifton and he had been working on the cable franchise including gathering copies of recently enacted franchises that included a franchise from Multnomah, Oregon where a cable consortium negotiated a state-of-the-art franchise. With Mayor Haakenson’s permission Mr. Clifton and he contacted Snohomish County and north King County and south Snohomish County cities to gauge their interest in forming a group to negotiate with Verizon as a consortium. He noted as a negotiator the City wanted to get the best deal possible for the citizens of Edmonds in a manner that was cost effective; however, because Verizon would be contributing directly with Comcast, there was no additional money for the City; the city was already receiving the maximum 5% franchise fee. He suggested the City may want to consider the assistance of a national consulting firm that specializes in cable TV franchises, a cost that could be reduced by several cities sharing a consultant. He explained Edmonds had taken the lead role in a series of meetings with cities and the county; at the present time Snohomish County (for its urbanized area), Mountlake Terrace, Kenmore, Brier, Woodway, and Mukilteo have expressed interest. He noted if the tools of the franchise were consistent, it would make that one less issue to be addressed at the time of annexation of UGA. He noted items of common interest include customer service standards, technical standards, right-of-way use, and public education governmental issues. He summarized the goal of the cities was to share information and costs and via an Interlocal Agreement negotiate as a consortium. Mr. Snyder questioned if the Council was interested in creating a consortium to negotiate with Verizon. He noted Verizon was presenting the same negotiating template to each city and the flaw and benefits of the proposal would be nearly the same for each city; the more consumers the consortium negotiates on the behalf of, the greater the leverage and the lower the cost. The group met today in Mountlake Terrace and Mountlake Terrace has begun interviewing consultants. He has been working on a draft Interlocal Agreement that he will discuss with the Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office and attorneys from the other cities if the Council indicates a desire to proceed. Mr. Snyder indicated the City’s portion of a $30,000-$50,000 consultant contract would be approximately 20%. For cities that did not participate in the consortium, the Interlocal Agreement would serve as a joint purchasing agreement. Mayor Haakenson commented the cost savings alone were worth the effort. He referred to the Verizon template that was provided to each city, noting it was the goal to develop a city template and the strength in numbers would resolve many issues. Councilmember Dawson agreed strength in numbers was important. She supported forming a consortium, noting it was difficult for cities to negotiate franchise agreements with cable companies on their own. She relayed commendations from an individual in the Snohomish County Executive’s Office who previously negotiated cable franchises for the City Everett, for the work done by Mr. Snyder and Mr. Clifton in this process and his comments that it was a pleasure to work with these professional, knowledgeable people. Councilmember Wilson asked if there were any major arguments against negotiating with Verizon as a consortium. Mr. Snyder answered only if there were unforeseen issues with the cost share. He noted the 5% franchise fee each city receives was levied for the purpose of supporting this effort. For most cities, it was deposited into their General Fund. He recalled when negotiating cable franchises 25 years ago, the cable franchising companies paid cities’ costs; that was no longer done. He noted the draft Interlocal Agreement was structured to allow a city to opt out at any time. Packet Page 12 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 11 Councilmember Wilson inquired about the impact on the City’s fiber optics. Mr. Snyder answered the rules that were established would apply to all franchises because a level playing field was required. For Councilmember Wilson, Mr. Snyder assured the Council would approve a franchise agreement for Edmonds and would be the ultimate arbiter of the terms. The intent of negotiating together was to have greater leverage with the cable company. Because Verizon would have hundreds of franchises in Washington and thousands nationally, there was an advantage for them to have consistent requirements. He hoped their desire for consistency could be leveraged to get a better economic deal, better technical requirements or better customer service standards for citizens. Councilmember Wilson referred to options in Mr. Snyder’s memo which included the City entering into an informal process with Verizon. Mr. Snyder commented detail regarding negotiating strategies should be conducted in Executive Session. The conundrum was the City had a 15-year old cable franchise; Verizon was guaranteed a level playing field by federal law. Therefore the City’s competitive franchise for Verizon by itself could be no better than what Comcast was providing. However, much had changed in 15 years and the City would like to develop a better franchise template. An ordinance adopted last year provided that any competitive franchise ordinance would have the same length as the longest franchise the City let; therefore, Verizon’s franchise would expire at the same time as Comcast. Verizon would rather have a longer franchise and via an informal process they should be willing to provide more to the City than would otherwise be available. The difficulty was the City was setting the bar for Comcast in the upcoming renegotiation process. He hoped the consortium and an informal process with Verizon could be used to draw Comcast into the discussion and negotiate their franchise renewal at the same time. He anticipated having a draft Interlocal Agreement available for Council consideration in 1-2 weeks. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO CONTINUE WITH THE SCHEDULE HE IDENTIFIED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess. 8. WORK SESSION ON THE UPCOMING CODE REWRITE Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained the Planning Board made two specific recommendations to the Council with regard to issues related to nuisance regulations and non-conforming regulations. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing tomorrow night on potential amendments to Chapter 20 regarding processing and procedures. He advised tonight’s work session was an opportunity to present information regarding the Planning Board’s two recommendations, identify the Chapter 20 issues that will be addressed in the Planning Board’s public hearing and allow the Council to ask questions and express comments/concerns. Councilmember Wilson asked whether the Council could attend tomorrow’s Planning Board meeting. Mr. Bowman answered yes, advising the code rewrite was legislative and there were no other quasi judicial matters on the Planning Board’s agenda. Mr. Bowman identified the key revisions to the Nonconforming Regulations in Chapter 17.40: • Change the damage percentage from 50% to 75% - under current regulations, if a building is damaged more than 50%, it must be brought into compliance. • Exceptions to the 75% rule - if a building or structure is damaged or destroyed due to the unlawful act of the owner or owner’s agent or the building is damaged or destroyed due to the ongoing neglect or gross negligence of the owner or the owner’s agent. Packet Page 13 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 12 • Historic Buildings/Structures - addition of clarifying language and reference to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. • New section regarding residential buildings in commercial zones - existing non-conforming buildings in commercial zones in use solely for residential purposes or structures attendant to such residential use may be remodeled or reconstructed without regard to the limitations of ECDC 17.40.2020(B), (E) and (F) but only if several conditions listed in the ordinance are met. City Attorney Scott Snyder recalled one of the lessons learned from the past 4-5 years of discussions regarding the downtown area was Edmonds citizens liked the existing downtown. However, the City’s non-conforming use provisions are very restrictive and are designed to abate or eliminate buildings that are significantly damaged. Staff’s goal was to preserve existing features that citizens liked and lighten provisions that require abatement and conformance with current zoning standards. Mr. Bowman noted this was the most difficult section of the code, particularly when owners are interested in adaptive reuse of buildings. If the Council believed in rehabilitation/reuse of buildings, the code should encourage that. Councilmember Wilson recalled the Planning Board minutes cited a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission to expand what was considered historical to over 40-years old, and asked if the language regarding being listed in a city-approved historical survey was in response to that recommendation. Mr. Bowman stated the language regarding a building or structure that was listed in a city-approved historical survey meeting the standards of the State Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation was intended to encourage reuse of historic structures. The building must comply with the life safety standards of the building code. Mr. Snyder noted the intent of that language was to broaden the category of buildings to those that may not be registered but were contained on the City’s inventory. Planning Manager Rob Chave acknowledged the Planning Board discussed 40-year old buildings in broad terms and ultimately agreed to expand the language to include buildings not only on a formal register but that were identified on the survey recognizing its historic value. Councilmember Wilson observed the survey seemed vague. Mr. Chave advised a survey was conducted and was reviewed by the Council but not formally approved; the City may want to establish a more formal approval process. Mr. Snyder advised that could be included in the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Wambolt inquired whether Old Milltown was classified as a conforming building. Mr. Bowman answered because of the zone district, Old Milltown had zero setbacks. Councilmember Wambolt asked how the code could be revised to prevent what was happening to Old Milltown. Mr. Snyder answered that type of process would actually be encouraged and may be necessary to meet modern health safety requirements. It would be difficult to provide fire walls, sprinkler systems, etc. in a building such as Old Milltown without removing the floors. Historic buildings could be reconstructed but must be brought up to modern health safety standards. The intent was to provide alternatives to demolition. Without an historic district or prohibitions on demolition it was often an economic decision by the property owner. He noted there were a number of historic homes nearby on very valuable property that existed by the grace of the owners. Without a mandate, the intent was to provide economic incentive to preserve historic structures. Mr. Bowman commented the restoration of Old Milltown was a choice pursued by the owner. Council President Plunkett referred to the exception to the 75% damage percentage - if a building or structure is damaged or destroyed due to the unlawful act of the owner or owner’s agent or the building is damaged or destroyed due to the ongoing neglect or gross negligence of the owner or the owner’s agent. He commented that he could understand the requirement for gross negligence but questioned whether it was too stringent for simple, ongoing neglect. Mr. Snyder referred to the Meadowdale Marina as an example, a structure that had been neglected for years and was an attractive nuisance/danger but if allowed to be rebuilt as condominiums could be very valuable. Mayor Haakenson emphasized there were Packet Page 14 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 13 no plans to construct condominiums on the Meadowdale Marina. Mr. Snyder clarified he was using that structure as an example; if it were grandfathered and allowed to be reconstructed as part of another structure, there were many valuable development options. He cautioned Council regarding the law of unintended consequences, noting there were many examples of structures Council would like to have preserved but opening a loophole could allow preservation of structures the Council may not want preserved. Council President Plunkett questioned the definition of neglect, envisioning a building could be neglected but would not be grossly neglected. Mr. Snyder commented the Council may want to have input from the Building Official regarding a damage percentage. Council President Plunkett summarized his concern was the definition of neglect. Mr. Bowman acknowledged it was difficult to draw the line at a certain percentage. He anticipated there would be testimony regarding this issue at the Council public hearing Mr. Bowman assured condominiums, restaurants, retail, etc. could not be constructed on the Meadowdale Marina as the retail uses on that site ceased to exist and have not existed for a long time. Council President Plunkett suggested 90 or 100% versus 75%. Mr. Snyder explained non-conforming use provisions were intended over time to bring structures into compliance with the code. There may be structures the Council would like to have preserved but others that if damaged 75% they would prefer be replaced. He noted 100% did not provide a tool for long term compliance with the zoning code. Council President Plunkett suggested allowing structures damaged 100% in the BD1 zone or eligible for historic registry to be allowed to be reconstructed. Mr. Snyder advised that was a policy issue for the Council. Council President Plunkett asked whether the Planning Board discussed 100% for the BD1 zone or on the list of historic structures. Mr. Bowman advised structures on the historic list were identified by the language, pointing out language in this section, shall prevent the full restoration and reconstruction of a building or structure which is either on the National Register of Historic Places, the Washington State Register of Historic Places, the Washington State Cultural Resource Inventory, the Edmonds Register of Historic Places or is listed in a city approved historical survey meeting the standards of the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. The Planning Board wanted to recognize that buildings were valuable and property owners may want to retain the existing buildings and that was why they increased the percentage from 50 to 75. He noted the Planning Board acknowledged if a building was totally destroyed, it should be rebuilt in compliance with the code. Council President Plunkett asked whether the paragraphs on Maintenance and Alternation, Relocation, and Restoration applied to historic structures. Mr. Bowman answered no. Council President Plunkett referred to the section regarding residential buildings in commercial zones and asked whether that applied to single family and multi family. Mr. Bowman answered it was directed toward single family structures in B districts in the downtown area but could be expanded to include multi family. Council President Plunkett was interested in as much flexibility in the BD1 zone as possible including for multi family buildings. Mr. Bowman advised he would relay the issues raised by the Council at the Planning Board public hearing. Mr. Snyder suggested giving consideration to how many of the multi family structures in commercial zones were non-conforming. Council President Plunkett summarized his interest was ensuring older structures remained economically viable including being allowed to expand slightly. Mr. Bowman commented the policy decision for the Council was whether to encourage adaptive reuse of buildings and if so, what type of improvements should be allowed. Mr. Snyder commented it may be appropriate to establish different regulations for certain zones. With regard to buildings damaged/destroyed due to neglect or gross negligence, Councilmember Wilson could envision an old building that burned to the ground due to old wiring that would not have been Packet Page 15 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 14 perceived to have been neglected. Mr. Bowman answered it would be nearly impossible to pursue a building owner for neglect in that instance when there was no obvious signs of neglect. The intent of the language was a property owner who allowed a building to visibly deteriorate to the point it was beyond repair. Councilmember Wilson commented not updating 60-year old wiring could be viewed as neglect. Mr. Bowman explained the intent was to provide a property owner with an historic structure on the list the ability to fully restore the structure if they desired. It may also be an incentive for some property owners to be included on the list. Mr. Chave advised the list was the result of a survey that used established standards and anticipated there would always be a very small number of properties on the survey as it required compliance with state and national standards. For example the survey that was done of downtown identified 82 buildings in the entire downtown bowl area. He noted a larger issue was 75% versus 100%. Mr. Bowman commented the percentage policy was related to whether the Council wanted buildings brought into compliance; if the answer was yes, there should be fairly strict requirements. If the City wanted to be more liberal, it should adopt a higher percentage which may result in allowing virtually everything to be rebuilt. Councilmember Dawson observed these issues would be presented to the Council at the public hearing. Mr. Bowman referred to the nuisance regulations, noting the original intent was to remove all nuisance regulations from the code and place them in Title 17 of the zoning code. The City Attorney’s office pointed out nuisance regulations should be part of the City’s police powers which are contained in the Municipal Code. Therefore performance standards would be included in Chapter 17.60 of the zoning code and nuisance regulations would be in the Municipal Code. He noted further changes needed to be made to Chapter 17.60 and another public hearing held by the Planning Board. He identified the key revisions to the Nuisance Regulations Chapter 6 of the Edmonds Municipal Code (EMC): • Clarifying the role of the Health Officer - under the current ordinance the Snohomish County Health Office addressed nuisances which was actually not the case. The Development Services Director was responsible for code enforcement • Eliminating obsolete regulations • Linking nuisance enforcement to the civil remedy process • Expanding the types of nuisances • Clarifying enforcement procedures • Establishing a separate junk vehicle proceedings consistent with State law Mr. Bowman observed Mr. Hertrich’s comment that a paved road to a woodpile was incorrect, noting he may be referring to performance standards in Chapter 17.60. He referred to a list of nuisances in Section 6.20.040, noting the list represented issues frequently encountered by the code enforcement officer. The current language in Chapter 6 was very broad with regard to what constituted a nuisance. He referred to Section 6.20.045, protective coverings, that stated a nuisance covered by a tarp did not eliminate the nuisance. Mr. Snyder commented the list of nuisances represented the things people complain about; the question was whether these were the things the Council wanted staff involved in. Mr. Bowman pointed out another advantage of having nuisances in the Municipal Code was the Council could change them without a public hearing although he acknowledged the Council rarely did that. Mr. Snyder clarified having nuisances in the Municipal Code avoided the requirement for Planning Board review and public hearing before a recommendation was forwarded to the Council. Packet Page 16 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 15 Council President Plunkett read from unidentified materials, “in the case of open storage of lumber, coal or other combustible material, a roadway shall be provided, graded, surface maintained from the street to the rear storage...fire trucks.” Mr. Bowman answered that was not in this section of the code, commenting it was likely an old version of Chapter 17.60. Council President Plunkett acknowledged it was a draft dated October 3, 2007. Mr. Bowman advised that was not part of the Chapter 6 recommendations from the Planning Board. Council President Plunkett asked why a tarp could not be used to cover a nuisance and whether a person had a right to store something on their property as long as it was covered. Mr. Snyder anticipated public comment would determine whether that was appropriate. He noted many citizens would not appreciate a neighbor covering piles of debris with tarps. Council President Plunkett asked about boats and RV storage. Mr. Bowman answered that issue was covered in Chapter 17.60 and would remain in the zoning code. He acknowledged an earlier version merged issues and the City Attorney recommended zoning code issues be separated from nuisance issues. Council President Plunkett asked why boats and RVs were not considered a nuisance. Mr. Snyder explained a public nuisance referred to items that were a danger to the public versus use of property which was a zoning issue. Councilmember Orvis observed nuisances were enforced on a complaint basis. He asked how long a person receiving a complaint had to bring the issue into compliance. Mr. Bowman answered the code enforcement officer made an initial contact and worked with the property owner to establish a reasonable compliance schedule. Only after a property owner did not comply with the compliance schedule was the more formal process begun. Mr. Snyder commented there was also a process to request a hearing. Councilmember Wilson pointed out Section 6.20.020(C) should refer to the Development Services Director rather than the Community Services Director. Mr. Bowman advised the Planning Board would be conducting a public hearing on February 26 to consider possible amendments to Chapter 20 with regard to permit process and procedures. Key issues under review include the following: • Establish new tables identify categories of permit types and processing procedures for each, • Create new posting and mailing procedures requiring permit applicants to assume the responsibility for providing notice for permit applications, • Remove the City Council from most quasi-judicial land use decisions or, in the alternative, require only written closed record reviews, • Create language for development agreements, • Clarify procedures for reconsideration requests, • Clarify how the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) integrates into the land use process, including planned actions, and • Provide for regulations allowing staff determinations that an application has lapsed due to lack of response for additional information. Mr. Bowman advised following their public hearing, the Planning Board would forward a recommendation to the Council and the Council would hold another public hearing. Council President Plunkett commented he was not overly enthused about the proposal to remove the Council from most quasi judicial land use decision or requiring only written closed record reviews. Packet Page 17 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 16 Councilmember Orvis observed the issue of removing the Council from quasi judicial land use decisions was controversial and he did not what that issue to delay adoption of other revisions. 9. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE AND BOARD MEETINGS. Council President Plunkett reported the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, who distributes funds collected via lodging taxes, reviewed their budget. The Committee distributed funds in 2007 to advertise Edmonds in a brochure in the Korean Times in Seattle, Snohomish Visitors Guide, Greater Seattle Information Guide, Washington Visitors Guide and Sunset Magazine. Funds were also used to advertise Bird Fest and $20,000 was distributed to the Arts Commission for allocation. Council President Plunkett reported Carl Nelson, the City’s Information Manager, made a presentation to the Outreach Committee regarding a radio frequency station for ferry users, advising the cost would be approximately $20,000 for hardware plus ongoing maintenance and management. The Outreach Committee agreed not to pursue the radio frequency. The Outreach Committee was also opened for new members and received five applications. Councilmember Olson reported the SeaShore Transportation Forum was rescheduling its meetings to the third Friday so that King County Councilmember Ferguson could attend. Sound Transit reported they were considering a fall 2008 or 2010 ballot measure that would be smaller, less costly and have less light rail, likely only light rail to Northgate and more buses, bus rapid transit lanes and Park & Rides in Snohomish County. She relayed Councilmember Dawson’s suggestion to have Sound Transit make a presentation to the Council. Councilmember Wambolt reported on the February 11 and 25 Port of Edmonds Commission meetings, advising the Port experienced $125,000 in damage from the December storm; their insurance has a $100,000 deducible but FEMA will cover $75,000. Attendance at the Seattle Boat Show, the largest boat show on the west coats, dropped from 77,000 in 2006 to 62,000 in 2007. The Port passed a drug free workplace policy and a policy preventing workplace violence. They reviewed their 2007 financial results; their 2007 net income was $401,000. The yacht club completed plans for a new building; they expect to have the plans submitted to the City in May and occupy the new building in December 2009. Councilmember Orvis reported the Snohomish County Health District Board allocated State funds to the communicable disease program, primarily for vaccinations and additional personnel. He stated vaccinations were the best way to control communicable diseases. The Board also approved a policy to increase the pay rate for Health District employees fluent in a foreign language, recognizing that the ability to communicate with the people the District serves was very important and the inability to communicate raised potential liability issues. He concluded it would also assist the District in controlling translators’ costs. Councilmember Orvis reported on the Disability Board, noting their financial situation was unchanged. He referred to HB 3292 regarding recording of Executive Sessions, noting the Disability Board recorded its meetings on a small recording device. Although it appeared the Legislature would not act on HB 3292, he suggested the use of a small recording device to record the Council’s Executive Sessions. Councilmember Dawson reported after serving as the Chair of the SnoCom Board for the past three years, she decided not to seek the chairmanship this year. She was hopeful Lynnwood Councilmember Ruth Ross who has served as Vice Chair would be elected Chair, noting Mountlake Terrace Councilmember Jerry Smith had expressed interest in serving as Vice Chair. She planned to continue to be actively involved on the Board particularly with regard to the purchase of the CAD system. Packet Page 18 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 17 Councilmember Dawson distributed a Community Transit report, noting the double-tall buses accommodated more passengers than articulated buses and were easier to maneuver. She advised Community Transit was seeking federal funding for the double-tall buses and thanked Mayor Haakenson for submitting a letter of support. She was recently appointed as the Community Transit representative to the PSRC Transportation Board. Councilmember Dawson further reported Sound Transit staff was considering a ballot measure, observing the three Snohomish County Boardmembers did not think it was a good idea for 2008. She had a briefing with Sound Transit staff today where she expressed her concern and anticipated receiving further information. She noted even in the best case scenario, there would be no light rail in Snohomish County and would only extend to Northgate. She was concerned that the proposal as currently configured relied exclusively on transit on I-5 and bus rapid transit lanes which she noted did not move rapidly during rush hour. Snohomish County was also constrained in that only a portion of the County was in the Sound Transit district. Ms. Dawson felt there was a way to make a transit package work for Snohomish County although she had not yet seen one nor was she convinced one could be developed in time for a November 2008 election. She advised an additional briefing would be provided at this week’s Sound Transit Board meeting and at an upcoming workshop. Councilmembers were encouraged to attend the next Snohomish County Cities and Towns meeting that would include a presentation from Sound Transit. Ms. Dawson suggested scheduling a presentation to the Council by Sound Transit staff. She encouraged Councilmembers and/or constituents to contact her with their thoughts regarding Sound Transit, noting the importance of providing citizen feedback to Sound Transit. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Haakenson thanked the Council for their support on the EMS levy agenda items. He recalled at the Council retreat the Council expressed interest in attending Planning Board and Architectural Design Board (ADB) interviews. He thanked Councilmember Wambolt for attending all the interviews last week and Councilmembers Olson and Bernheim who attended a few. He advised ADB interviews were scheduled in his office at 8:00 and 9:00 a.m. on February 28 and 4:30 p.m. on February 29. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Wilson recalled his comments a few weeks ago regarding Stevens Hospital potentially moving out of the Edmonds area and a potential bond issue in August. He expressed his appreciation to the Enterprise for their article regarding Stevens Hospital. He planned to meet with the Stevens Hospital CEO and invite him to make a presentation to the Council. He emphasized Stevens Hospital was the single largest employer in Edmonds and allowing them to move out of the city would be a disservice to the community. If Stevens Hospital proposed a ballot measure for funding that would facilitate their move, he commented it was incumbent on the City to defeat that measure. He encouraged Councilmembers to talk about this issue in the community. Councilmember Dawson concurred with Councilmember Wilson’s comments, noting Stevens Hospital’s potential move was the topic of discussion at the Highway 99 Task Force as development in that area was based on the presence of the hospital. She recommended impressing upon Stevens Hospital if they wanted their M&O levy passed, they would need to commit to the City that they would not move the hospital. Councilmember Dawson advised she would be absent from the March 4 Council meeting as she would be in Washington DC on business. Packet Page 19 of 158 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 26, 2008 Page 18 Mayor Haakenson pointed out the hospital moving out of Edmonds would also impact the Fire Department immensely as response times would increase due to the additional distance to the hospital and would take aid vehicles out of service for longer periods of time. He summarized the potential increase in Fire Department staff was another reason to keep the hospital in Edmonds. COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER WILSON FROM THE FEBRUARY 12 COUNCIL MEETING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:11 p.m. Packet Page 20 of 158 AM-1437 2.C. Approval of Claim Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Debbie Karber Submitted For:Dan Clements Time:Consent Department:Administrative Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #102525 through #102703 in the amount of $779,669.69 issued February 28, 2008. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2008 Revenue: Expenditure: $779,669.69 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $779,669.69 Attachments Link: Claim cks 2-28-08 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Kathleen Junglov 02/28/2008 01:12 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 02:58 PM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/28/2008 03:03 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 03:15 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 02/28/2008 12:08 PM Packet Page 21 of 158 Final Approval Date: 02/28/2008 Packet Page 22 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102525 2/28/2008 072144 A NEW TOMORROW'S ELECTRIC INC Ref000184819 BUSINESS LIC REFUND CST#00210794 Refund-Overpmt of Bus Lic Cst #00210794 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00 Total :40.00 102526 2/28/2008 070941 AAF INTERNATIONAL 788467 PW - FILTERS PW - FILTERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 102.48 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.12 Total :111.60 102527 2/28/2008 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 252096 1-13992 PEST CONTROL 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 57.50 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.410.23 5.12 Total :62.62 102528 2/28/2008 069445 ALLDATA 425-771-0233 /CITXIQ ALLDATA PRO ONLINE DATA SUBSCRIPTION ALLDATA PRO ONLINE DATA SUBSCRIPTION 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 1,500.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 133.50 Total :1,633.50 102529 2/28/2008 062813 ARAI JACKSON ELLISON 2007178-002 PARK MAINT BLDG - SPACE PROGRAMMING AND PARK MAINT BLDG - SPACE PROGRAMMING AND 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 3,877.50 Total :3,877.50 102530 2/28/2008 069751 ARAMARK 655-3592440 UNIFORM SERVICES 1Page: Packet Page 23 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102530 2/28/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 30.36 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.70 Total :33.06 102531 2/28/2008 069751 ARAMARK 655-3582578 18386001 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 88.91 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 7.91 18386001655-3592442 UNIFORMS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 107.89 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 9.60 Total :214.31 102532 2/28/2008 069751 ARAMARK 655-3580714 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 2Page: Packet Page 24 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102532 2/28/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK PW MATS655-3590548 PW MATS 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.38 PW MATS 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 5.24 PW MATS 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 5.26 Sales Tax 001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.12 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.47 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.46 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC655-3590549 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 3.24 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 3.24 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.29 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.29 3Page: Packet Page 25 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102532 2/28/2008 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-3592441 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 40.44 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.60 Total :88.22 102533 2/28/2008 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 00096111 WATER - PLASTIC RETAINER, CV/RV RUBBER WATER - PLASTIC RETAINER, CV/RV RUBBER 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 85.86 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.66 Total :90.52 102534 2/28/2008 064343 AT&T 730386050200 425-744-6057 PUBLIC WORKS Public Works Fax Line 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 1.82 Public Works Fax Line 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 6.92 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 6.92 Public Works Fax Line 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 6.92 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 6.93 Public Works Fax Line 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 6.92 Total :36.43 102535 2/28/2008 064541 AURORA RENTS INC 165051 4424 IMPACT SOCKET 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 8.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 0.71 4Page: Packet Page 26 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :8.711025352/28/2008 064541 064541 AURORA RENTS INC 102536 2/28/2008 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 75126 OPERATIONS UNIFORMS HELMET DECALS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 22.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 1.96 Total :23.96 102537 2/28/2008 071439 AUTOMATIC ENTRIES INC 18352 SR CENTER - TRANSMITTER SR CENTER - TRANSMITTER 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 68.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.05 Total :74.05 102538 2/28/2008 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 44173 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 113.44 UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 113.44 UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 113.77 UB Outsourcing area #800 postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 339.98 UB Outsourcing area #800 postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 339.97 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 10.10 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 10.10 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 10.12 5Page: Packet Page 27 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102538 2/28/2008 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS44191 UB Outsourcing area #100 printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 90.71 UB Outsourcing area #100 printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 90.71 UB Outsourcing area #100 printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 90.97 UB Outsourcing area #100 postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 272.14 UB Outsourcing area #100 postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 272.13 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 8.07 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 8.07 Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 8.10 Total :1,891.82 102539 2/28/2008 001702 AWC EMPLOY BENEFIT TRUST March 2008 MARCH 2008 AWC PREMIUMS 03/08 Fire Pension AWC Premiums 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 2,276.20 03/08 Retirees AWC Premiums 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 25,539.90 03/08 Gaydos AWC Premiums 001.000.510.526.100.230.00 1,107.13 03/08 AWC Premiums 811.000.000.231.510.000.00 287,514.57 Total :316,437.80 102540 2/28/2008 064934 BARKER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PS 08-01-7 E7MA.Services thru January 2008 E7MA.Services thru January 2008 132.000.640.594.760.650.00 450.00 Total :450.00 6Page: Packet Page 28 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102541 2/28/2008 002170 BARTON, RONALD 30 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 672.10 Total :672.10 102542 2/28/2008 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 631907 INV#631907 - EDMONDS POLICE ATAC BOOTS/OFFICER M.POFF 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.99 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.12 INV#636699 - EDMONDS POLICE636699 DUTY BELT/OFFICER A.MEHL 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 45.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 4.09 INV#636702 - EDMONDS POLICE636702 CAP COVER, MACE HOLDER, BATON CASE, 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 138.95 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 12.37 Total :288.47 102543 2/28/2008 070009 BOLA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING #5 MUSEUM MASONRY RESTORATION- MUSEUM MASONRY RESTORATION- 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 1,719.02 Total :1,719.02 102544 2/28/2008 002800 BRAKE & CLUTCH SUPPLY 440688 UNIT 31 - PARTS FOR SERVICE UNIT 31 - PARTS FOR SERVICE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,484.44 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 132.12 Total :1,616.56 102545 2/28/2008 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 1472815 C-249 7Page: Packet Page 29 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102545 2/28/2008 (Continued)066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL C-249 PROCESS CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS 414.000.656.594.320.650.00 314.57 Total :314.57 102546 2/28/2008 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC JLL1057 Computer Lazy Susan Mount/Swing arm & Computer Lazy Susan Mount/Swing arm & 001.000.620.558.600.350.00 525.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.600.350.00 46.77 Total :571.77 102547 2/28/2008 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 117168 WELDING SUPPLIES OXYGEN, ACETYLENE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 64.04 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.70 Total :69.74 102548 2/28/2008 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY117073 ALS SUPPLIES medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 11.21 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.41 ALS SUPPLIESLY117074 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 67.28 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 7.41 8Page: Packet Page 30 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102548 2/28/2008 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY ALS SUPPLIESLY117075 medical oxygen 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 11.21 Freight 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 16.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.310.00 2.41 Total :149.93 102549 2/28/2008 064690 CHAMPION BOLT & SUPPLY INC 480732 EDM00001 NUTS & BOLTS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 256.10 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 22.02 Total :278.12 102550 2/28/2008 065774 CHAVOND-BARRY ENGINEERING CORP 1560-021108 INCINERATOR CONSULTING INCINERATOR CONSULTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 291.00 Total :291.00 102551 2/28/2008 066382 CINTAS CORPORATION 460837172 VOLUNTEERS UNIFORMS Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 24.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.15 OPS UNIFORMS460837173 Stn 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.24 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.97 9Page: Packet Page 31 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102551 2/28/2008 (Continued)066382 CINTAS CORPORATION UNIFORMS460838232 Stn 17 - ALS 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 101.15 Stn 17 - OPS 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 101.14 Sales Tax 001.000.510.526.100.240.00 9.01 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 9.00 OPS UNIFORMS460838253 Stn. 20 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 141.43 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 12.59 UNIFORMS460842404 Volunteers 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 24.16 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.410.240.00 2.15 OPS UNIFORMS460842405 Stn. 16 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 123.24 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.240.00 10.97 Total :695.36 102552 2/28/2008 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF JAN 08 WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF JAN 08 411.000.654.534.800.330.00 495.00 Total :495.00 102553 2/28/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1892042 SUPPLIES 10Page: Packet Page 32 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102553 2/28/2008 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES DISPOSABLE SHOE COVERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 75.35 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.71 Total :82.06 102554 2/28/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1892328 FAC MAINT - KIT TOWEL ROLLS, TT FAC MAINT - KIT TOWEL ROLLS, TT 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 404.44 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.24 FAC MAINT - TRASH LINERSW1893728 FAC MAINT - TRASH LINERS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 550.92 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.75 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.28 Total :1,046.38 102555 2/28/2008 004095 COASTWIDE LABORATORIES W1866565 FAC MAINT - MED, LG GLOVES FAC MAINT - MED, LG GLOVES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 138.00 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 12.50 Total :153.00 102556 2/28/2008 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 30068 CODE UPDATES 11Page: Packet Page 33 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102556 2/28/2008 (Continued)064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO Code Supplements 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 3,143.00 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 279.73 CODE UPDATES30082 Code Supplements 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 20.00 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1.78 Total :3,444.51 102557 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2425 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS 12Page: Packet Page 34 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102557 2/28/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS FRAMING 117.200.640.575.500.490.00 50.48 WOOD FRAME POSTER DISPLAY 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 133.86 FLOWER POTS FOR FLOWER PROGRAM 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 82.75 CARDSTOCK 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 20.39 WHITE PAPER 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 6.38 FOLDING PROJECT 123.000.640.573.100.490.00 289.67 EGG HUNT SUPPLIES 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 198.00 STAMPS AND STAMP PADS FOR FRONT DESK 001.000.640.574.200.310.00 20.52 WOOD BOX FOR DISCOVERY PROGRAMS 001.000.640.574.350.310.00 136.10 EVENT REGISTRATION:~ 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 390.00 GYMNASTICS BIRTHDAY PARTY SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.550.310.00 65.92 GARDEN SHOW ADMISSIONS FOR:~ 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 68.00 GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.550.310.00 123.15 CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS2994 MARINER TICKETS FOR HEKINAN VISITORS 623.200.210.557.210.490.00 165.00 SURVEY SERVICES FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 125.000.640.594.750.410.00 19.95 Total :1,770.17 102558 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 1287 CDW-G HP Officejet Pro 13Page: Packet Page 35 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102558 2/28/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS CDW-G HP Officejet Pro 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 60.35 CDW-G HP Officejet Pro 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 60.35 CDW-G HP LaserJet 4250 Maint Kit 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 320.46 Experts Exchange - 1yr On-line 001.000.310.518.880.490.00 109.45 Books 001.000.310.518.880.310.00 95.80 Total :646.41 102559 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 9757 LOG BOOK LOG BOOK 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 90.24 Total :90.24 102560 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 2276 ACCT #2276 - GANNON REGISTRATION/G.GANNON~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 1,135.05 ACCT#3263 - O'BRIEN3263 3/CASES PURELL HAND SANITIZER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 59.23 BCCPA MEMBER RENEWAL/HESLOP~ 001.000.410.521.300.490.00 50.08 RIBBON FOR ID CARD PRINTER~ 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 126.72 MEMOREX CD-R 100/PK 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 125.90 H&H TOURNI-KWIK 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 87.82 500 ML 16 OZ AMBER BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 101.28 14Page: Packet Page 36 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102560 2/28/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS ACCT#4685 - COMPAAN4685 FERRY COSTS/COUNCIL RETREAT 001.000.410.521.100.430.00 51.75 ACCT#8272 - EDMONDS8272 SHEET PROTECTORS/OFFICE MAX 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 56.59 FEDEX OVERNIGHT -MINI 14 ~ 001.000.410.521.220.420.00 80.32 ACCT#8298 - BARD8298 AIR FARE - HESLOP~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 404.50 LODGING/R.HESLOP~ 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 67.58 REGISTRATION/S.KAMKA~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 199.00 REGISTRATION/D.MACHADO~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 325.00 REGISTRATION/D.ANDERSON~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 695.00 12 GAL CRATE/BAR SUPPORT, AND VCR/STEREO 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 39.14 CJTC RANGE TARGETS 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 128.00 CDR 52X 100/PK SPINDLE 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 16.32 REGISTRATION/M.MARSH~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 325.00 Total :4,074.28 102561 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 1025 CARD CHARGES Sno Cnty Recording Fees 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 139.00 Total :139.00 102562 2/28/2008 069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS 1457 PAYPAL - APWA MANAGING RAPID CHANGES - 15Page: Packet Page 37 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102562 2/28/2008 (Continued)069983 COMMERCIAL CARD SOLUTIONS PAYPAL - APWA MANAGING RAPID CHANGES - 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 55.00 FREDPRYOR SEMINAR - WATER - K KUHNHAUSEN5988 FREDPRYOR SEMINAR - WATER - K KUHNHAUSEN 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 179.00 CLICK N SHIP - FLEET POSTAGE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 4.60 LOWES - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/LOG CABIN 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 191.66 CLICK N SHIP - FLEET POSTAGE 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 11.00 CLICK N SHIP - FAC MAINT POSTAGE TO AMEC 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 4.60 CLICK N SHIP - PW 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 18.40 CONNECTICUT ELECTRIC - FAC MAINT - PW 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 174.62 CLICK N SHIP - FAC MAINT - AZAI, JACKSON 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 4.60 NW ENV - SIGHTLINE RENWAL - S FISHER 411.000.654.537.900.490.00 50.00 RADIOSHACK - LS 7 - BATTERIES7577 RADIOSHACK - LS 7 - BATTERIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.28 HOME DEPOT -UNIT 474 -SUPPLIES 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.87 GRIMMER- UNIT 33 - VALVE CHK, SWITCH 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 120.26 RINDA TECH - SHOP - DIACOM MARINE FOR 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 590.93 RADIOSHACK - UNIT 483 - OVAL ROCKER 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.04 Total :1,428.86 102563 2/28/2008 068161 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC 1000047968 PS - LCD DISPLAY REPAIR 16Page: Packet Page 38 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102563 2/28/2008 (Continued)068161 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC PS - LCD DISPLAY REPAIR 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 739.30 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 65.80 PS - MONITORING 2008 ANNUAL FEE1000048121 PS - MONITORING 2008 ANNUAL FEE 001.000.651.519.920.410.00 393.25 Total :1,198.35 102564 2/28/2008 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM9081 IRISH DANCE CLASSES IRISH DANCE #9081 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 71.40 IRISH DANCE #9085 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 140.00 IRISH DANCE #9002 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 47.60 IRISH DANCE #9004 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 308.00 IRISH DANCE #9014 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 134.40 Total :701.40 102565 2/28/2008 005850 CRETIN, LAWRENCE E7AD.Monitor Monitory for Trans Plan Public Meeting Monitory for Trans Plan Public Meeting 112.200.630.595.440.410.00 36.00 Total :36.00 102566 2/28/2008 066368 CRYSTAL AND SIERRA SPRINGS 0208 2989771 5374044 INV#0208 2989771 5374044 - EDMONDS PD COOLER RENTAL/WATER BOTTLES 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 75.89 Total :75.89 102567 2/28/2008 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 169959 E4FC.Catch Basins 17Page: Packet Page 39 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102567 2/28/2008 (Continued)063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC E4FC.Catch Basins 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 4,485.58 Sales Tax 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 381.27 Total :4,866.85 102568 2/28/2008 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 39623 OPS COMMUNICATIONS Remote speaker mics 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 774.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 7.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.420.00 69.51 Total :850.51 102569 2/28/2008 061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 172967 CITY PARK BLDG CERT/PERMIT - 2008 18Page: Packet Page 40 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102569 2/28/2008 (Continued)061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES CITY PARK BLDG CERT/PERMIT - 2008 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 69.70 CITY HALL CERT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 19.70 LIBRARY CERT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 19.70 MUSEUM CERT'S 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 39.40 PS CERT'S 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 137.90 OLD PW CERT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 19.70 FS 20 CERT'S 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 39.40 MCH CERT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 19.70 PW CERT'S 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 78.80 SR CENTER CERT'S & PERMIT 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 128.80 WWTP CERT'S 411.000.656.538.800.910.00 157.60 YOST PARK CERT'S 001.000.651.519.920.490.00 98.50 Total :828.90 102570 2/28/2008 072145 DISTINCTIVE WINDOWS INC 15034 Labor & Materials to install safety Labor & Materials to install safety 001.000.310.514.230.480.00 1,515.00 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.480.00 134.84 Total :1,649.84 102571 2/28/2008 065046 DITCH WITCH NW EXCHANGE 99048 UNIT 33 - VALVE 19Page: Packet Page 41 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102571 2/28/2008 (Continued)065046 DITCH WITCH NW EXCHANGE UNIT 33 - VALVE 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.19 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.41 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.61 Total :62.21 102572 2/28/2008 071836 DMI DRILLING CONSTRUCTION Pmt 5.E7FH/E5FJ E7FH.76th Ave Emergency Storm Repairs E7FH.76th Ave Emergency Storm Repairs 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 23,772.20 E7FH.76th Ave Emergency Storm Repairs 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 23,772.20 E7FJ.OVD Emergency Repairs 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 53,653.72 E7FJ.OVD Emergency Repairs 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 53,653.71 E7FH.Retainage 5 112.200.000.223.400.000.00 -1,188.61 E7FH.Retainage 5 412.200.000.223.400.000.00 -1,188.60 E7FJ.Retainage 5 112.200.000.223.400.000.00 -2,682.69 E7FJ.Retainage 5 412.200.000.223.400.000.00 -2,682.69 Total :147,109.24 102573 2/28/2008 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 08-1327.1 E7FK.Services thru 02/17/08 E7FK.Services thru 02/17/08 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,158.87 Total :1,158.87 102574 2/28/2008 007253 DUNN LUMBER 02308274 FLOWER BASKET PROGRAM 20Page: Packet Page 42 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102574 2/28/2008 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER CEDAR AND SUPPLIES FOR FLOWER BASKETS 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,238.14 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 110.19 CREDIT FOR RETURNED PRODUCT02308314 CREDIT FOR RETURNED GOODS 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 -69.75 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 -6.21 Total :1,272.37 102575 2/28/2008 072139 DURHAM GEO SLOPE INDICATOR 2049539 Water Level Indicator, 150 Ft w/Handle Water Level Indicator, 150 Ft w/Handle 001.000.620.532.200.350.00 445.00 Sales Tax 001.000.620.532.200.350.00 39.61 Total :484.61 102576 2/28/2008 070754 EDM PUBLISHERS 15303711 PREV MISC Fire Cause & Origin Law Bulletin 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 149.00 Freight 001.000.510.522.300.490.00 9.43 Total :158.43 102577 2/28/2008 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 91652 SUPPLIES WRENCH 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.99 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.53 SUPPLIES91668 BRUSH HEADS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.98 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.38 21Page: Packet Page 43 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :47.881025772/28/2008 007675 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 102578 2/28/2008 067728 EDMONDS CONFERENCE CENTER 3342 RENTAL FOR BIRDFEST RECEPTION Rental for Birdfest Reception on 9/12/08 001.000.240.513.110.450.00 550.00 Total :550.00 102579 2/28/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 7-05276 WATER 820 15TH ST SW~ 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 89.23 Total :89.23 102580 2/28/2008 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00650 LIFT STATION #7 LIFT STATION #7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.25 LIFT STATION #81-00925 LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.25 LIFT STATION #11-01950 LIFT STATION #1 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.25 LIFT STATION #21-02675 LIFT STATION #2 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 23.08 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms1-03950 Public Works Fountain, Bldgs & Restrooms 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 324.82 Public Works Meter Shop1-05350 Public Works Meter Shop 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 54.65 LIFT STATION #61-05705 LIFT STATION #6 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 45.09 CITY HALL1-13975 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 175.89 22Page: Packet Page 44 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102580 2/28/2008 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION CITY HALL1-14000 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 61.69 LIFT STATION #32-26950 LIFT STATION #3 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 43.27 LIFT STATION #144-34080 LIFT STATION #14 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 21.25 Total :813.49 102581 2/28/2008 069586 ESPIRITU, KRISTA ESPIRITU9075 HULA HULA KIDS #9075 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 366.53 Total :366.53 102582 2/28/2008 009315 EVERETT COMMUNITY COLLEGE 15589 ALS MISC Beardsley attend Instructor I 001.000.510.526.100.490.00 125.00 Total :125.00 102583 2/28/2008 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU12141 STREET - SUPPLIES STREET - SUPPLIES 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 15.90 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 1.41 Total :17.31 102584 2/28/2008 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1128906 17983 PIPING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 464.03 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 41.30 Total :505.33 102585 2/28/2008 072132 FH CONSULTING CRYSTAL REG/ASSET FORFEITURE -K.CRYSTAL/EDM 23Page: Packet Page 45 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102585 2/28/2008 (Continued)072132 FH CONSULTING REGISTRATION/K.CRYSTAL~ 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 150.00 Total :150.00 102586 2/28/2008 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 101706 Feb 08 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT Feb 08 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent 001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT101706 Mar 08 Mar 08 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent 001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00 Total :600.00 102587 2/28/2008 072138 FUELCARE 5049 CLEAN DIESEL TANKS CLEAN DIESEL TANKS 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 3,031.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 269.78 Total :3,301.03 102588 2/28/2008 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-16 E6DA.Services thru 01/12/08 E6DA.Services thru 01/12/08 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 21,796.88 E6DA.Services thru 02/09/0806713.00-17 E6DA.Services thru 02/09/08 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 23,206.84 Total :45,003.72 102589 2/28/2008 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 00794460 036570 PVC PIPE/CEMENT/PRIMER 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 130.56 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 13.32 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 12.81 Total :156.69 24Page: Packet Page 46 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102590 2/28/2008 012900 HARRIS FORD INC FOCS233436 UNIT 411 - REPAIRS UNIT 411 - REPAIRS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 330.71 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 29.43 UNIT 717 - STEERING REPAIRSFOCS233548 UNIT 717 - STEERING REPAIRS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 75.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 6.68 Total :441.82 102591 2/28/2008 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2274573 WATER - ROUND IT TOOL WATER - ROUND IT TOOL 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 397.65 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.350.00 35.39 Total :433.04 102592 2/28/2008 071417 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 6616200 E4FC.PVC Sewer Pipe E4FC.PVC Sewer Pipe 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 1,302.00 Sales Tax 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 98.95 E4FC.PVC Sewer Pipe6745703 E4FC.PVC Sewer Pipe 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 3,976.56 Sales Tax 412.200.630.594.320.650.00 338.01 Total :5,715.52 102593 2/28/2008 071368 HEFFERAN, BRIGITTE HEFFERAN9105 CALLIGRAPHY UNCIAL CALLIGRAPHY #9105 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 315.00 Total :315.00 25Page: Packet Page 47 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102594 2/28/2008 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 18501 E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 5,737.26 E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 5,737.25 E7FJ-OVD Emergency Mtl Testing 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 5,913.56 E7FJ-OVD Emergency Mtl Testing 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 5,913.55 E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing18635 E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 6,313.61 E7FH-76th Emergency Mtl Testing 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 6,313.61 E7FJ-OVD Emergency Mtl Testing 112.200.630.542.000.480.00 2,576.64 E7FJ-OVD Emergency Mtl Testing 412.200.630.594.320.480.00 2,576.64 Total :41,082.12 102595 2/28/2008 070864 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 360001735271 C/A 360000657091 Feb 08 Superpages.com 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 34.95 C/A 360000764828360001756296 02/08 Web Server Hosting for Internet 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 34.95 ACCT # 430001405909440009095535 Mar 08 Directory Listings P&R 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 117.50 Total :187.40 102596 2/28/2008 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 75693562 COPIER LEASE CANON COPIER LEASE 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 487.68 Total :487.68 26Page: Packet Page 48 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102597 2/28/2008 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 75665433 INV#75665433 - EDMONDS POLICE RENTAL 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 821.73 ADDITIONAL IMAGES 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 268.10 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.450.00 97.02 Total :1,186.85 102598 2/28/2008 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 010494746 C/A 010494746 PR1-1 City Phone Service 001.000.390.528.800.420.00 804.53 Total :804.53 102599 2/28/2008 068737 JOHNSON ROBERTS & ASSOC 109105 INV#109105 - EDMONDS POLICE PHQ REPORT/MCCLAIN 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 24.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 4.60 Total :28.60 102600 2/28/2008 066913 KDL HARDWARE SUPPLY INC 356990 FAC MAINT - KEY SUPPLY FAC MAINT - KEY SUPPLY 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 149.50 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.41 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.15 Total :173.06 102601 2/28/2008 063501 KENS CAMERA INC 91864 INV #91864 - EDMONDS POLICE FILM REPRINTS 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 5.88 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 0.51 Total :6.39 27Page: Packet Page 49 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102602 2/28/2008 067552 KING CO FINANCE & BUSINESS 49499 114939 SLUDGE DISPOSAL 411.000.656.538.800.510.00 2,263.87 Total :2,263.87 102603 2/28/2008 069343 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC 0967688-14718 FAC - CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION FAC - CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION 116.000.651.519.920.410.00 2,035.00 Total :2,035.00 102604 2/28/2008 016600 KROESENS INC 83038 INV#83038 - D. KINNEY/EDMONDS PD 3/SHIRTS-D.KINNEY~ 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 187.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 16.64 Total :203.64 102605 2/28/2008 016600 KROESENS INC 85614 OPS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING KH boots 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 202.80 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 18.05 Total :220.85 102606 2/28/2008 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 02082008-1 INV#02082008-1 - EDMONDS PD 31 BASIC CAR WASHES/DEC 2007 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 77.50 40 BASIC CAR WASHES/JAN 2008 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 100.00 VAN WASH/JANUARY 2008 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 5.00 Total :182.50 102607 2/28/2008 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 02082008-3 Wash Wash 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 7.50 28Page: Packet Page 50 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :7.501026072/28/2008 017050 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 102608 2/28/2008 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 2008-166 MOWER SUPPLIES WALKER IDLER ARM UPGRADE 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 13.78 Freight 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 11.92 Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.29 Total :27.99 102609 2/28/2008 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC 18102 2795 HVAC MAINTENANCE 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 398.00 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 35.42 Total :433.42 102610 2/28/2008 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 097316 BUSINESS CARDS C COUN C CLK FIN PD DS 29Page: Packet Page 51 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102610 2/28/2008 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS Business Cards:~250-00190 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 14.50 D. J. Wilson250-00190 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 14.50 Mayumi Wilson250-00190 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 14.50 Nicole McConnell250-00190 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 14.50 Steve Morrison250-00190 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 14.50 Justin D. Lee250-00190 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 14.50 Eric Falk Double Sided250-00190 001.000.410.521.710.310.00 39.50 Gretchen Buck250-00190 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 14.50 Sales Tax 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 2.58 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1.29 Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.310.00 1.29 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 1.29 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 1.29 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.710.310.00 3.52 Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.29 30Page: Packet Page 52 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102610 2/28/2008 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS BUSINESS CARDS COMM SVCS ECON DEV097317 Business Cards:~250-00194 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 37.50 Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 3.34 Total :194.39 102611 2/28/2008 018970 LYNNWOOD DODGE DOCS253883 UNIT 10 - STEERING REPAIRS UNIT 10 - STEERING REPAIRS 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 98.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 8.72 Total :106.72 102612 2/28/2008 070959 MAINTSTAR INC 28 ANNUAL MAINTSTAR SUPPORT ANNUAL MAINTSTAR SUPPORT 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 1,747.00 Total :1,747.00 102613 2/28/2008 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 08020024 FAC MAINT/ LIBRARY - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT/ LIBRARY - SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 106.15 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.45 Total :115.60 102614 2/28/2008 019583 MANPOWER INC 16952351 Temp for Linda Ross 2/4/08 Temp for Linda Ross 2/4/08 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 56.81 Total :56.81 102615 2/28/2008 065829 MARTINSON, LINDA MARTINSON9259 BELLY DANCE CLASSES BELLY DANCE #9259 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 123.00 Total :123.00 31Page: Packet Page 53 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102616 2/28/2008 068950 MARYSVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 08-042 OPS MISC C.Smith Captain college 001.000.510.522.200.490.00 249.00 Total :249.00 102617 2/28/2008 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 46832 YOST POOL IMPROVEMENTS WHITE PAINT, PRIMER FOR YOST POOL 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 553.50 Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 49.26 Total :602.76 102618 2/28/2008 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 80700044 123106800 PIPE FITTING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 45.96 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.47 12310680080811370 CORDLESS DRILL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 392.62 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 20.29 12310680081158976 SPONGE/O RINGS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 22.26 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.47 12310680081226971 PRESSURE REGULATOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 335.78 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.66 32Page: Packet Page 54 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102618 2/28/2008 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12310680081227692 STRAINER/MESH/PIPE FITTING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 71.94 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.47 12310680081250319 CORDLESS DRILL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 255.94 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 8.78 Total :1,176.64 102619 2/28/2008 072010 MEISER, GARLAND MEISER0208 PICKLE BALL LEAGUE PICKLE BALL SUPERVISOR~ 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 96.00 Total :96.00 102620 2/28/2008 072112 MERIT ENGINEERING INC Merit Eng Inc Refund BLD Permit 08-033/34/35 Refund BLD Permit 08-033/34/35 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 345.00 Total :345.00 102621 2/28/2008 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 63118 17967 PROPANE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 32.68 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.91 Total :35.59 102622 2/28/2008 068662 MINNIHAN, TERRY 31 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 196.50 Total :196.50 102623 2/28/2008 071123 MOORS, JAMES 2467 UNIFORMS/MOORS 33Page: Packet Page 55 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102623 2/28/2008 (Continued)071123 MOORS, JAMES UNIFORMS/MOORS 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 350.00 Total :350.00 102624 2/28/2008 022009 MOTOROLA INC 78080712 OPS REPAIRS & MAINT Feb 08 thru Jan 09 Serv Agrmt 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 2,040.00 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.480.00 181.56 Total :2,221.56 102625 2/28/2008 072113 NEAL, RYAN NEAL0225 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER @ EDMONDS CC~ 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 60.00 Total :60.00 102626 2/28/2008 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0362322-IN FLEET FILTER INVENTORY - FILTERS FLEET FILTER INVENTORY - FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 53.01 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 4.56 UNIT 31 - FILTERS0362981-IN UNIT 31 - FILTERS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 175.53 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.10 Total :248.20 102627 2/28/2008 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S2015892.001 2091 PANEL LIGHTS 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 155.70 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 13.86 Total :169.56 102628 2/28/2008 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 0087743 SODIUM BISULFITE 34Page: Packet Page 56 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102628 2/28/2008 (Continued)066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 1,450.95 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 129.13 Total :1,580.08 102629 2/28/2008 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 0672604 CREDIT FOR HONEYBUCKET CREDIT FOR HONEY BUCKET @ BRACKETT'S 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -10.00 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0677549 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL FOR~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 92.20 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL0677550 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:~ 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 98.02 Total :180.22 102630 2/28/2008 064811 NORTHWEST TROPHY INC 111855 Retirement plaques Retirement plaques 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 81.60 Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 7.26 Total :88.86 102631 2/28/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 450992 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8 1/2 X 14 PAPER~ 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 38.04 Sales Tax 001.000.640.574.100.310.00 3.38 Total :41.42 102632 2/28/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 188225 520437 35Page: Packet Page 57 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102632 2/28/2008 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC FOLDERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 5.25 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 0.47 Total :5.72 102633 2/28/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 377912 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 117.36 Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 10.45 Total :127.81 102634 2/28/2008 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 525547 Office Supplies for DSD Office Supplies for DSD 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 332.29 Total :332.29 102635 2/28/2008 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 61184 DUMP FEES BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 159.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 0.54 DUMP FEES61204 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 159.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 0.54 DUMP FEES61221 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 159.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 0.54 36Page: Packet Page 58 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102635 2/28/2008 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS DUMP FEES61246 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 159.14 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 0.54 Total :638.72 102636 2/28/2008 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 57624 STORM DUMPING FEES STORM DUMPING FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 174.45 STORM DUMPING FEES57643 STORM DUMPING FEES 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 174.45 Total :348.90 102637 2/28/2008 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 010197549 ADMIN RENTAL/LEASE Admin copier 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 137.06 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.100.450.00 12.20 Total :149.26 102638 2/28/2008 027155 PARK SEED WHOLESALE 20186862 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FOR FLOWER PROGRAM 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 81.17 Freight 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 2.30 Total :83.47 102639 2/28/2008 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.675963 PAINT SUPPLIES BASE PAINT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.90 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.68 Total :20.58 37Page: Packet Page 59 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102640 2/28/2008 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.672150 CITY HALL - PAINT, BRUSHES, MASKING CITY HALL - PAINT, BRUSHES, MASKING 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 195.76 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.43 Total :213.19 102641 2/28/2008 070931 PATTON BOGGS LLP 012008 FEDERAL LOBBYIST JANUARY 2008 Federal Lobbyist for January 2008 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,000.00 Total :4,000.00 102642 2/28/2008 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK8910 PILATES CLASSES PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT #8910 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 294.00 Total :294.00 102643 2/28/2008 007800 PETTY CASH petty cash jury duty mileage reimb-Startzman 38Page: Packet Page 60 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102643 2/28/2008 (Continued)007800 PETTY CASH jury duty mileage reimb-Startzman 001.000.510.522.100.430.00 8.18 jury duty mileage reimb-Startzman 001.000.510.522.100.110.00 10.00 flashdrive 001.000.240.513.110.310.00 10.88 refreshments for 2008 council retreat 001.000.110.511.100.310.00 53.12 reimbursement for cost of ferry commute 001.000.210.513.100.430.00 23.10 mileage reimb for sno cnty meeting-Carl 001.000.210.513.100.430.00 80.90 coffee/supplies 2nd floor 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 39.47 sccfoa meeting-Hynd 001.000.250.514.300.490.00 10.00 4 council members to attend sno cnty 001.000.110.511.100.490.00 144.00 mike thies mileage reimb 001.000.620.558.800.430.00 23.74 reimb. for class-mike thies 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 40.00 reimb ferry fare to council 001.000.110.511.100.430.00 108.13 sno cnty meeting-haakenson & carl 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 72.00 Total :623.52 102644 2/28/2008 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 165094 INV#165094 - EDMONDS POLICE RADIO SENT FOR SERVICE/POSTAGE 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 21.78 Total :21.78 102645 2/28/2008 064088 PROTECTION ONE 291104 CITY PARKS BLDG - REPAIR 39Page: Packet Page 61 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102645 2/28/2008 (Continued)064088 PROTECTION ONE CITY PARKS BLDG - REPAIR 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 103.46 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL31146525 24 hour alarm monitoring-CH 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 35.00 Total :138.46 102646 2/28/2008 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ9000 FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP FELDENKRAIS~ 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 189.00 Total :189.00 102647 2/28/2008 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0022810-IN EDMCITW BIB PANTS/HYPO 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 161.90 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.12 13.60 Total :175.50 102648 2/28/2008 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B FLOW METERING STATIONS TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 137.82 Total :137.82 102649 2/28/2008 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 46059 INV#46059 - EDMONDS POLICE TIRE CHANGE/WINCHING/POLICE VEH 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 272.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 24.21 40Page: Packet Page 62 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102649 2/28/2008 (Continued)070955 R&R STAR TOWING INV#50757 - EDMONDS POLICE50757 TOW/ 93 NISSAN~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 170.00 WAIT TIME FOR TOW FROM PD~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 136.00 STORAGE/93 NISSAN 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 129.50 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 38.76 INV#51029 - EDMONDS POLICE51029 TOW POLICE VEHICLE TO CITY SHOP~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 136.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 12.10 Total :918.57 102650 2/28/2008 071696 RANKINS, KATE RANKINS0223 MONITOR PLAZA ROOM AND ANDERSON CENTER GYM 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 105.00 Total :105.00 102651 2/28/2008 068483 RH2 ENGINEERING INC 46699 E3JC.Services thru 01/27/08 E3JC.Services thru 01/27/08 412.100.630.594.320.650.00 252.00 Total :252.00 102652 2/28/2008 068484 RINKER MATERIALS 9414677838 STREET - ASPHALT STREET - ASPHALT 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 399.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 35.51 41Page: Packet Page 63 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102652 2/28/2008 (Continued)068484 RINKER MATERIALS STREET - ASPHALT COLD MIX9414695577 STREET - ASPHALT COLD MIX 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 352.80 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 31.40 Total :818.71 102653 2/28/2008 072137 ROCHFORD, PATRICK BOOT ALLOWANCE 2008 STREET - BOOT ALLOWANCE - ~ STREET - BOOT ALLOWANCE - ~ 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 169.50 Total :169.50 102654 2/28/2008 069593 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 00446-578599 UNIT K93 - WINDSHIELD UNIT K93 - WINDSHIELD 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 142.64 Total :142.64 102655 2/28/2008 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL 2197603 STORM - JET SET, COLD PATCH STORM - JET SET, COLD PATCH 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 1,489.00 Freight 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 75.00 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.400.310.00 139.20 Total :1,703.20 102656 2/28/2008 070880 SANDERS & ASSOCIATES INC 0509106CE-01 OUTFALL SEDIMENT CONSULTING OUTFALL SEDIMENT CONSULTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 3,325.00 Total :3,325.00 102657 2/28/2008 072140 SCHUCHART CORPORATION Ref000184763 BUS LIC REFUND CST #00210745 Overpmt of Business Lic 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00 Total :40.00 42Page: Packet Page 64 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102658 2/28/2008 061482 SEA-WESTERN INC 122503 OPS PROTECT CLOTHING Facepiece & components 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 213.56 Freight 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 6.99 Sales Tax 001.000.510.522.200.250.00 19.63 Total :240.18 102659 2/28/2008 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 07-45CM CREDIT FROM 3/16/07 CREDIT FROM 3/16/07 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -45.00 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -3.97 UNIT 31 - CATCH BASIN, ALUM WELD08-185 UNIT 31 - CATCH BASIN, ALUM WELD 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 307.92 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.40 Total :286.35 102660 2/28/2008 072133 SEVERSON, HEATHER SEVERSON0215 REFUND CLASS REFUND 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 90.00 Total :90.00 102661 2/28/2008 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0075463-IN UNIT 717 -ANGLE BRACKET UNIT 717 -ANGLE BRACKET 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.00 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.50 Total :29.50 102662 2/28/2008 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-181105 RETURNED SUPER Z CHAINS 43Page: Packet Page 65 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102662 2/28/2008 (Continued)036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC RETURNED SUPER Z CHAINS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -64.08 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -5.51 UNIT 11 - BRAKE KIT, BRAKE DRUM, LINED19-020906 UNIT 11 - BRAKE KIT, BRAKE DRUM, LINED 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 735.29 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 63.23 UNIT 11 - SCOTSEAL, EXCHANGED GUARDIAN19-020928 UNIT 11 - SCOTSEAL, EXCHANGED GUARDIAN 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 66.41 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.71 Total :801.05 102663 2/28/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060028723 YOST PARK POOL YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 567.48 MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK2710014701 MAPLEWOOD HILL PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.21 Total :598.69 102664 2/28/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 716016235 958-001-000-8 WWTP POWER 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 29,557.41 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1,773.44 206-001-485-5896010338 24400 HIGHWAY 99 RICHMOND PARK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.52 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.71 44Page: Packet Page 66 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102664 2/28/2008 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 463-001-671-7922007701 8421 244TH ST RICHMOND PARK 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 28.52 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.71 Total :31,391.31 102665 2/28/2008 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2060014392 SIGNAL LIGHT SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.21 SIGNAL LIGHT2470018124 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 37.46 LIFT STATION #32960019335 LIFT STATION #3 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 160.05 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT3380016422 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.26 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK3460019262 FIVE CORNERS WATER TANK 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 465.45 NEW TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHT AT 215TH &3630573867 NEW TRAFFIC CONTROL LIGHT AT 215TH & 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 91.00 LIBRARY3720012057 LIBRARY 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,807.03 BLINKING LIGHT3970013599 BLINKING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.72 LIFT STATION #134010023721 LIFT STATION #13 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 257.89 45Page: Packet Page 67 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102665 2/28/2008 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL4680011956 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 113.09 Public Works4840011953 Public Works 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 106.94 Public Works 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 406.38 Public Works 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 406.38 Public Works 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 406.38 Public Works 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 406.38 Public Works 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 406.36 SIGNAL LIGHT5380011832 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.72 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX5390028164 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 5,524.23 CITY HALL5410010689 CITY HALL 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,128.39 TRAFFIC LIGHT5450016042 TRAFFIC LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 187.26 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS5470012336 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHTS 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.72 Fire station #167060000275 Fire station #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 31.63 46Page: Packet Page 68 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :15,094.931026652/28/2008 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 102666 2/28/2008 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2008003 INV#2008003 - EDMONDS POLICE BOOKINGS/JANUARY 2008 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 6,471.06 HOUSING DAYS/JANUARY 2008 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 40,524.06 Total :46,995.12 102667 2/28/2008 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2295280-01 STORM - 5 JEANS - MIKE JOHNSON STORM - 5 JEANS - MIKE JOHNSON 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 169.95 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 14.62 STORM- 5 JEANS - M BROWN2295413-01 STORM- 5 JEANS - M BROWN 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 142.50 Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 12.26 STREET - 5 JEANS - T BACH2296286-01 STREET - 5 JEANS - T BACH 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 172.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 14.79 FLEET - WORK JACKET - SITTAUER4128287-01 FLEET - WORK JACKET - SITTAUER 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 49.99 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 4.45 STREET - 5 JEANS - P ROCHFORD4128454-01 STREET - 5 JEANS - P ROCHFORD 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 168.50 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 15.00 47Page: Packet Page 69 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102667 2/28/2008 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS STREET - 5 JEANS - J WHATMORE4128476-01 STREET - 5 JEANS - J WHATMORE 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 171.40 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 15.25 STREET - 5 JEANS - C HIATT4128879-01 STREET - 5 JEANS - C HIATT 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 170.00 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 15.13 STREET - 5 JEANS - P JOHNSON4129058-01 STREET - 5 JEANS - P JOHNSON 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 206.50 Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 18.38 Total :1,360.72 102668 2/28/2008 038413 SOUND TRACTOR IN65471 PARTS PARTS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.57 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.46 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.01 Total :38.04 102669 2/28/2008 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 23971 FS 17 - MULTI CODE 2 BUTTON REMOTE FS 17 - MULTI CODE 2 BUTTON REMOTE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 50.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.45 Total :54.45 102670 2/28/2008 070677 SPRINT 0620014133-1 0620014133-1 - EDMONDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 48Page: Packet Page 70 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102670 2/28/2008 (Continued)070677 SPRINT DATA CARDS 001.000.410.521.220.420.00 172.07 Total :172.07 102671 2/28/2008 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO March 2008 MARCH 2008 STANDARD INSURANCE 03/08 Standard Insurance 811.000.000.231.550.000.00 18,763.52 Total :18,763.52 102672 2/28/2008 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING 158271 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 258.61 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 21.98 Total :280.59 102673 2/28/2008 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1358554 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 411.89 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 36.66 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES1362234 FAC MAINT - ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 173.26 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.42 PS - ELECT SUPPLIES1367025 PS - ELECT SUPPLIES 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 492.58 Sales Tax 116.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.84 49Page: Packet Page 71 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102673 2/28/2008 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY FAC MAINT - RETURN ELECT SUPPLIES1367026 FAC MAINT - RETURN ELECT SUPPLIES 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -172.52 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -15.35 Total :985.78 102674 2/28/2008 061912 SUN SUPPLY 0702172-IN SUPPLIES COREX 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 58.14 Total :58.14 102675 2/28/2008 067835 T-MOBILE 135840772 CELL PHONE USEAGE PARK MAINTENANCE CELL PHONES 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 85.91 Total :85.91 102676 2/28/2008 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10639892 SUPPLIES SCREWS, WASHERS, CLAMPS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 357.61 Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.83 Total :389.44 102677 2/28/2008 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10637669 PLAZA RM - BUTTON HEAD SOCKETS WITH PINS PLAZA RM - BUTTON HEAD SOCKETS WITH PINS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 98.05 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.73 Total :106.78 102678 2/28/2008 072114 TAYLOR, RYAN TAYLOR0107 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER BASKETBALL SUPERVISOR @ EDMONDS CC~ 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 60.00 Total :60.00 50Page: Packet Page 72 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 51 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102679 2/28/2008 072141 TECHNOCOM INC Ref000184764 BUS LIC REFUND CST #00210743 Overpmt on Business Lic 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 40.00 Total :40.00 102680 2/28/2008 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1569731 NEWSPAPER AD Ordinance 3679 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 22.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES1569733 Ordinance 3678 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 23.68 NEWSPAPER AD1570964 3/4/08 Hearing (Ord 3679) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 34.04 NEWSPAPER AD1571127 3/4 Hearing (Storm Water) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 51.48 Total :131.40 102681 2/28/2008 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1568780 Legal Notice STF 07-24 HOVDE Legal Notice STF 07-24 HOVDE 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 22.20 Legal Notice AMD-07-13 City1569993 Legal Notice AMD-07-13 City 001.000.620.558.600.440.00 31.08 Total :53.28 102682 2/28/2008 070577 TNEMEC CO INC 070033713 PLAZA RM - ENVIRO-CRETE DEEPTONE BASE PLAZA RM - ENVIRO-CRETE DEEPTONE BASE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 132.00 Freight 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 55.00 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.65 Total :203.65 51Page: Packet Page 73 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 52 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102683 2/28/2008 068322 TRANE 8134114 SERVICE AGREEMENT 01060 0001 - SERVICE AGREEMENT 01060 0001 - 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 274.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 24.43 Total :298.93 102684 2/28/2008 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 14162 LOG CABIN - KEY BLANKS LOG CABIN - KEY BLANKS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.82 TREATMENT PLANT - KEY BLANKS14223 TREATMENT PLANT - KEY BLANKS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.50 Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.67 UNIT 233 - CODE KEYS14228 UNIT 233 - CODE KEYS 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 47.25 Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.21 Total :81.95 102685 2/28/2008 043670 UNDERWATER SPORTS 628582 INV#628582 - EDMONDS POLICE DIVE FINS/STRAPS~ 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 37.50 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 3.34 Total :40.84 102686 2/28/2008 063596 UNIMIN CORPORATION 2623499 005-0728447 SAND 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 677.60 Total :677.60 52Page: Packet Page 74 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 53 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102687 2/28/2008 072098 UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES LLC 45268 E6DA.ROW Acquisition thru 01/31/08 E6DA.ROW Acquisition thru 01/31/08 125.000.640.594.750.650.00 5,677.96 Total :5,677.96 102688 2/28/2008 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA0212581-WA STREET EMPLOYEE - DOT STREET EMPLOYEE - DOT 111.000.653.542.900.410.00 65.00 Total :65.00 102689 2/28/2008 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 8010159 utility locates FOR JAN 08 utility locates FOR JAN 08 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 133.59 utility locates FOR JAN 08 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 133.59 utility locates FOR JAN 08 411.000.652.542.900.410.00 133.62 Total :400.80 102690 2/28/2008 072118 VANDERVEEN FAMILY TRANSPORT 02052008 SLUDGE HAULING SLUDGE HAULING 411.000.656.538.800.410.11 1,200.00 Total :1,200.00 102691 2/28/2008 072143 VERITY CREDIT UNION VERITY0225 REFUND REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 500.00 Total :500.00 102692 2/28/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-771-1124 CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL CITY PARK MAINTENANCE BLDG-EMAIL 001.000.640.576.800.420.00 53.58 Total :53.58 102693 2/28/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-2844 POLICE T1 LINE Police T1 Line 2/10-3/10/08 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 375.18 53Page: Packet Page 75 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 54 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102693 2/28/2008 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet425-NW2-0887 Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00 Total :655.18 102694 2/28/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 712 0423 AFTER HOURS PHONE AFTER HOURS PHONE 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 60.82 Total :60.82 102695 2/28/2008 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-8379 MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM MEADOWDALE COMMUNITY CLUB-SCAN ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 19.93 TELEMETRY STATIONS425-712-0417 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 28.85 TELEMETRY STATIONS 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 28.85 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES425-712-8251 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 001.000.650.519.910.420.00 14.14 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 70.71 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 57.98 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 57.98 P/W FIRE ALARM, FAX LINE & 2 SPARE LINES 511.000.657.548.680.420.00 82.04 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM425-775-2455 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 54.43 Total :414.91 102696 2/28/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 670091643-00001 425-327-5379 54Page: Packet Page 76 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 55 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102696 2/28/2008 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone-unit #77 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 44.96 425-231-2668769986915-01 cell phone-water lead 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 39.29 Total :84.25 102697 2/28/2008 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0631608005 Cell Service - GRAF Cell Service - GRAF 001.000.620.524.100.420.00 60.07 Total :60.07 102698 2/28/2008 072142 W A BOTTING COMPANY Ref000184765 BUS LIC REFUND CST #00009241 Business License not required 001.000.000.257.310.000.00 25.00 Total :25.00 102699 2/28/2008 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH PWS ID 22500 U 2008 OPERATING PERMIT FEE - J WAITE 2008 OPERATING PERMIT FEE - J WAITE 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 5,642.50 2008 SYSTEM CERTIFICATION FEE 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 536.00 Total :6,178.50 102700 2/28/2008 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 39196 INV#39196 - EDMONDS POLICE STORAGE/89 VOLVO - 928WNK~ 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 136.00 Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 12.01 Total :148.01 102701 2/28/2008 071359 WASSER CORPORATION 110273 PAINT 55Page: Packet Page 77 of 158 02/28/2008 Voucher List City of Edmonds 56 12:04:44PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 102701 2/28/2008 (Continued)071359 WASSER CORPORATION PAINT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 108.36 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 42.13 Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 13.24 Total :163.73 102702 2/28/2008 068227 WCFA EDWARDS0314 COLLEGE OF CEMETERY & FUNERAL STUDIES COLLEGE OF CEMETERY & FUNERAL STUDIES: 130.000.640.536.200.490.00 85.00 Total :85.00 102703 2/28/2008 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 286 FEBRUARY 2008 RETAINER February 08 Retainer 001.000.360.515.230.410.00 6,000.00 Total :6,000.00 Bank total :779,669.69179 Vouchers for bank code :front 779,669.69Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report179 56Page: Packet Page 78 of 158 AM-1427 2.D. 2007-2007 Fire Department Work Plan #2 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Tom Tomberg Time:Consent Department:Fire Type:Information Review Committee:Public Safety Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan Update #2. Approved for the consent agenda by the Public Safety Committee on 02-12-08. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Information only. Previous Council Action On November 28, 2006 Council approved the 2007-2008 Fire Department Work Plan. Narrative The 2006 Council approval of the 2007-2008 Work Plan was in compliance with City of Edmonds Strategic Plan II. Council Public Safety Statement, Objective D., Develop Public Safety Plans. Per the Strategic Plan, the Public Saftey Committee received Work Plan #1 and #2 Updates on June 12, 2007 and February 12, 2008, respectively. At the 2-12-08 presentation, the Public Safety Committee directed Fire Administration to place Update #2 on a future Council Consent Agenda. Update #2 is on the Fire Department website www.edmondsfire.org. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 2007-2008 EFD Work Plan Update #2 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/25/2008 08:47 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/25/2008 08:49 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/25/2008 11:53 AM APRV Form Started By: Tom Tomberg Started On: 02/22/2008 08:09 AM Final Approval Date: 02/25/2008 Packet Page 79 of 158 Packet Page 80 of 158 Packet Page 81 of 158 Packet Page 82 of 158 Packet Page 83 of 158 Packet Page 84 of 158 Packet Page 85 of 158 Packet Page 86 of 158 Packet Page 87 of 158 AM-1433 2.E. SR99 International District Enhancements Call for Bids Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Conni Curtis Submitted For:Dave Gebert Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Authorization to call for bids for the decorative illumination portion of the SR99 International District Enhancement project. This consent agenda item was not reviewed by a Council Committee. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize Staff to call for bids for the decorative illumination portion of the SR99 International District Enhancement project. Previous Council Action None Narrative Design for the illumination portion of the SR99 International District Enhancement project is complete. Design was performed by CH2M Hill consultants with input from and review by City Staff. The adopted 2007-2008 Capital Budget includes $316,000 for construction of the SR99 International District Enhancement project in Fund 129. The City has received a Federal grant in the amount of $316,000 under the Statewide Transportation Enhancements program for this project. Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/28/2008 10:00 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/28/2008 05:36 PM APRV 3 Parks and Recreation Brian McIntosh 02/28/2008 05:42 PM APRV 4 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 08:19 AM APRV 5 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/29/2008 09:09 AM APRV 6 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 09:10 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/28/2008 07:25 AM Packet Page 88 of 158 Final Approval Date: 02/29/2008 Packet Page 89 of 158 AM-1436 2.F. Senior Center Recreational Services Agreement Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Brian McIntosh Time:Consent Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign Recreational Services Ageement with the South County Senior Center. This consent agenda item was not reviewed by a Council Committee. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Authorize Mayor to sign the agreement. Previous Council Action None Narrative The City of Edmonds has a long-standing relationship with the South County Senior Center staff and Board of Directors to assist in providing recreation services at the South County Senior Center. Annually the City of Edmonds agrees to contribute to recreational services and programs to benefit these citizens. The 2008 Agreement provides a continuation of support for these beneficial programs. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Senior Center Rec Serv Agreement 2008 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 02:58 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/28/2008 03:03 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/28/2008 03:15 PM APRV Form Started By: Brian McIntosh Started On: 02/28/2008 11:57 AM Final Approval Date: 02/28/2008 Packet Page 90 of 158 Packet Page 91 of 158 Packet Page 92 of 158 Packet Page 93 of 158 AM-1438 3. Public Hearing on Stormwater Management Program Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Conni Curtis Submitted For:Don Fiene Time:30 Minutes Department:Engineering Type:Information Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Public Hearing on the City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Program. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff No action required. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The Federal Stormwater Phase II Final Rule (December 8, 1999) requires operators of regulated small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The MS4s are required to develop a stormwater management program designed to prevent harmful pollutants from being washed by stormwater runoff into the MS4 (or from being dumped directly into the MS4). The City of Edmonds was issued a Phase II Municipal permit on January 17, 2007 that became effective February 16, 2007. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) is the permitting authority for Washington State Cities. Each permittee is required to develop and implement a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) in an effort to achieve the requirements of the Phase II permit and must prepare written documentation of the SWMP. The SWMP documentation is required to address and be organized in accordance with five major program components. Those five components are 1) Public Education and Outreach, 2) Public Involvement and Participation, 3) Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination, 4) Controlling Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment and Construction Sites and 5) Pollution Prevention and Operation and Maintenance for Municipal Operations. The SWMP report is to be updated annually and sent with a permittee's annual report to Ecology. The annual report and SWMP report are to be sent to Ecology prior to March 31 of each year. The deadlines to meet the requirements detailed in the Phase II permit are phased over a five year period. Staff will present an overview of the permit requirements and the City’s Stormwater Management Program designed to meet those requirements. One of the requirements is to educate elected officials and policy makers with regard to the permit requirements. Another deadline requirement Packet Page 94 of 158 for this year with regard to public involvement is to create opportunities for the public to participate in the decision-making processes involving the development, implementation and update of the permittee’s SWMP. This presentation serves as part of the education requirement and the public hearing provides an opportunity for public input and participation in the Stormwater Management Program. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Phase II Annual Report Link: Draft Stormwater Management Plan Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/29/2008 07:42 AM APRV 2 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/29/2008 08:33 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 08:33 AM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/29/2008 09:09 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 09:10 AM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/28/2008 03:30 PM Final Approval Date: 02/29/2008 Packet Page 95 of 158 Packet Page 96 of 158 Packet Page 97 of 158 Packet Page 98 of 158 Packet Page 99 of 158 Packet Page 100 of 158 Packet Page 101 of 158 Packet Page 102 of 158 Packet Page 103 of 158 Packet Page 104 of 158 Packet Page 105 of 158 Packet Page 106 of 158 Packet Page 107 of 158 Packet Page 108 of 158 Packet Page 109 of 158 Packet Page 110 of 158 Packet Page 111 of 158 Packet Page 112 of 158 Packet Page 113 of 158 Packet Page 114 of 158 Packet Page 115 of 158 Packet Page 116 of 158 Packet Page 117 of 158 City of Edmonds Surface Water Management Program (SWMP) Document By Don Fiene, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Edmonds, Washington 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Wa. 98020 2/08/08 DRAFT Packet Page 118 of 158 1 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (2/08/08 DRAFT) Introduction: This document has been prepared to meet the City of Edmonds’ Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (Permit) requirement for development of a Surface Water Storm Management Program (SWMP). The City’s SMWP is designed to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), to meet the Washington State All Known and Reasonable Treatment (AKART) requirements, and protect water quality. As part of the implementation of the City’s SWMP, the City will gather, track, maintain and use information on an on-going basis to evaluate the SWMP development, implementation, Permit compliance, and to set priorities. Beginning no later than January 1, 2009, the City will begin to track the cost (or estimated cost) of development and implementation of each component of the SWMP. This SWMP will be updated annually for submittal with the City’s Annual Report to Ecology. The City of Edmonds Surface Water Utility held SWMP Planning Board and City Council hearings for public review in February 2008 and this document is also located on the City of Edmonds website, www.ci.edmonds.wa.us so it can be viewed by the public. Comments on the City of Edmonds’ SWMP can be made by filling out a Citizen Comment form. All comments must be in written format. Citizen comment forms are available on the City of Edmonds website or you can come to City Hall in person and request one at 121 5th Avenue N, Edmonds, Washington, 98020. Shown in black print are the NPDES Phase II permit requirements. Shown in blue print are City of Edmonds comments regarding what the City has done to date to comply. Section 1: Public Education and Outreach Requirements: The City’s SWMP will include an education program aimed at residents, businesses, industries, elected officials, policy makers, planning staff and other employees of the City. The goal of the education program will be to reduce or eliminate behaviors and practices that cause or contribute to adverse stormwater impacts. The City’s education program may be developed locally or regionally. a. Education and Outreach Program: No later than February 16, 2009, the City will provide an education and outreach program for the area served by its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). The outreach program will be designed to achieve measurable Packet Page 119 of 158 2 improvements in the target audience’s understanding of the problem and what they can do to solve it. Education and outreach efforts will be prioritized to target the following audiences and subject areas: i. General public • General impacts of stormwater flows into surface waters. • Impacts from impervious surfaces. • Source control BMPs and environmental stewardship actions and opportunities in the areas of pet waste, vehicle maintenance, landscaping and buffers. ii. General public, businesses, including home-based and mobile businesses • BMPs for use and storage of automotive chemicals, hazardous cleaning supplies, carwash soaps and other hazardous materials. • Impacts of illicit discharges and how to report them. iii. Homeowners, landscapers and property managers • Yard care techniques protective of water quality. • BMPs for use and storage of pesticides and fertilizers. • BMPs for carpet cleaning and auto repair and maintenance. • Low Impact Development techniques, including site design, pervious paving, retention of forests and mature trees. • Stormwater pond maintenance. iv. Engineers, contractors, developers, review staff and land use planners • Technical standards for stormwater site and erosion control plans. • Low Impact Development techniques, including site design, pervious paving, retention of forests and mature trees. • Stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs. b. Measurement: The City will measure the understanding and adoption of the targeted behaviors among the targeted audiences. The resulting measurements will be used to direct education and outreach resources most effectively, as well as to evaluate changes in adoption of the targeted behaviors. c. Tracking: The City will track and maintain records of public education and outreach activities. Packet Page 120 of 158 3 Overview of City of (Section 1) Edmonds Public Education and Outreach Program: The Environmental Education Coordinator (Parks Department) is responsible for developing, staffing and publicizing the Discovery Programs. The programs are publicized in a variety of ways, depending on the target audience. They are promoted in the “CRAZE” Recreation Program Guide, which is published three times a year and distributed to households and other locations in South Snohomish County. Registration information is sent to all Edmonds schools in September for the Discover the Forest and Sound Salmon Programs. In October it is sent for the Discover the Treasure Beach Walk Program, and is sent again in January for the Discover the Forest and Sound Salmon programs. Descriptions of programs and events, as well as other useful information, can also be found under Discovery Programs on the City’s web site at ; City of Edmonds Discovery Program. The Engineering Division also gives educational presentations on Stormwater concerns to Elementary school students upon request. Engineering staff have made presentations yearly since September 1993 to a 5th grade class at Seaview Elementary school. The elementary students also spend a day in the field (yearly since 1994) testing for stream health, and another day planting native plants along one of the stream corridors within the city. Additionally, Educational pamphlets have been sent out to selected businesses that reside and work within the City of Edmonds. The City of Edmonds Public Works Department provides a storm drain stenciling program, offering free assistance and use of stenciling supplies. Information regarding the storm drain stenciling program is offered on the City’s web site; The City is currently part of a multi-jurisdictional grant process to define target audiences and develop effective messages. In addition the City will continue all existing programs and take the following additional actions and conduct the following activities: a. Education and Outreach Program i. General public • City staff educates and provides opportunities for involvement for citizens and school groups on the impacts of stormwater flows into surface water and the impacts of impervious surfaces through various programs and means including Discovery Program, Sound Salmon Outreach Program, Beach Cleanups, the annual Watershed Fun Fair, Classroom Presentations, the Storm Drain Stenciling program and the Olympic Beach Beach ranger Visitor Station. (See Appendix A for Chronological List of Public Involvement and Education Activities for 2007). Packet Page 121 of 158 4 • The City provides brochures on the following topics; Car Washing Tips, automotive maintenance activities, gardening/lawn care, pet waste, watershed educational guide, and Best Management Practices for Businesses. The City has posted “Scoop and Leash your dog” signs throughout the Community. “Mutt Mitt” pet waste stations are located at the City dog park. • The City provides source control BMP’s regarding Landscaping and buffers (Streamside Landowners Best Management Practices (BMPs) and a handout entitled; Residential Best Management Practices. Environmental stewardship actions have included a yearly Earth Day event on the stream buffer at Perrinville Creek. The City offers information and opportunities for environmental stewardship on the City Website. ii. General public, businesses, including home-based and mobile businesses. • The City provides BMP’s on the use, storage, and disposal options of automotive chemicals, hazardous cleaning supplies, carwash soaps and other hazardous materials. The City is handing out Snohomish County’s “Household Hazardous Waste: Drop-Off Station” bookmark. This bookmark informs residents of what hazardous waste is and how to dispose of it properly. The City provides residents with the Snohomish County hazardous waste recycling brochure. Both the brochure and bookmark encourage residents to take their hazardous waste to a local disposal, recycling or drop-off facility. • City mailed out info on BMPs and illegal discharges to the following selected types of businesses; Food Service Businesses, Auto Repair Facilities, Auto Sales Busineses and Concrete Contractors. (Mailed to all businesses of those types who do business in Edmonds) • The City Surface Water Utility educates about the impacts of illicit discharges. Citizens are encouraged to call City Hall and report water quality problems. The City’s Engineering Staff respond to all reports and documents them. Information regarding impacts of Illicit discharges and how to report them is provided on the City website. • The City will provide additional Public Education and outreach opportunities to home based and mobile businesses prior to February, 2009. Packet Page 122 of 158 5 iii. Homeowners, landscapers and property managers • The City does not currently provide education on Yard Care techniques protective of water quality. The City is collaborating with Snohomish County and other agencies within the county to implement a shared program that will educate homeowners as well as landscapers on yard care techniques. This education program will also educate on BMP’s for use and storage of pesticides and fertilizers. This educational opportunity will be provided prior to February, 2009. • The City provides a handout regarding Automobile Maintenance, Repair & Sales Best management Practices. • The City Surface Water Utility does not currently provide education on BMP’s for carpet cleaning. The City will provide education on this topic by February 2009. • The City will provide information on the City website prior to February, 2009 regarding Low Impact Development techniques, including site design, pervious paving, retention of forests and mature trees. • The Public Works Department educates businesses and homeowner associations on how to maintain Stormwater ponds. The education materials developed by the city for detention pond maintenance are from a variety of sources including the Ecology’s 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The City’s website will provide additional education on detention pond maintenance by February 2009. iv. Engineers, contractors, developers, review staff and land use planners • The City currently relies on Ecology’s 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington on Technical standards for stormwater techniques. • The City relies on Ecology’s 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to on Stormwater treatment and flow control BMP’s. • The City plans on adopting the latest Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington or equivalent by August 2009. Education of the engineers, contractors, developers, review staff and land use planners shall be provided prior to February, 2009. Packet Page 123 of 158 6 • The City Development Services Department is beginning to encourage Low Impact Development techniques, including site design, pervious paving, retention of forests and mature trees when they are talking to developers about options for storm water control. The City will have a Low Impact Development code in place by August 2009. Education of the engineers, contractors, developers, regarding Low Impact Development techniques shall be provided prior to February, 2009. • Planning ,Engineering and Public Works Staff are aware of the Municipal NPDES Permit. More education regarding the implications of the permit and requirements will be provided to these audiences prior to February, 2009. b. Measurement The City is collaborating with Snohomish County and other agencies within the county to measure the understanding and adoption of the targeted behaviors among the targeted audiences c. Tracking The City has been tracking records of public education and outreach activities. The City will continue to develop better tracking and measures for targeted behaviors of the education and outreach activities. Section 2: Public Involvement and Participation Requirements: The SWMP will include ongoing opportunities for public involvement through advisory councils, watershed committees, participation in developing rate- structures, stewardship programs, environmental activities or other similar activities. The City will comply with applicable State and local public notice requirements when developing its SWMP. The City will take the following actions and conduct the following activities: a. Opportunities for Public Participation: No later than February 16, 2008, the City will create opportunities for the public to participate in the decision-making processes involving the development, implementation and update of the City’s entire SWMP. The City will develop and implement a process for consideration of public comments on its SWMP. b. Availability of Documents: The City will make its SWMP, the annual report required under S9.A of the City’s Permit, and all other submittals required by the Permit, available to the public. The annual report, and SWMP that was submitted with the latest annual report, will be posted on the City’s website. Packet Page 124 of 158 7 Overview of City of Edmonds (Section 2) Public Involvement and Participation Program: a. Opportunities for Public Participation and Availability of Documents The City of Edmonds SWMP is located on the City’s website. www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. The public can provide feedback at any time regarding development, implementation and updates of the City’s SWMP. A citizen comment sheet is provided on the website and at the front counter. This information has also been advertised on City Television Channel 21. A Public Hearing regarding the City’s Stormwater Management Program was held before the Planning Board on February 13, 2008. A Public Hearing was also held before the City Council on March 4, 2008 and was advertised beginning on February 1, 2007 An article regarding the Stormwater Management program and information regarding the opportunity for Public Involvement will also be published in the quarterly City newsletter sent to all households in Edmonds in midyear 2008. b. Availability of Documents The first annual report for this permit is due on March 31st, 2008. A copy of this annual report will be posted on the City’s website, http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/engr_dept.stm after the original is sent to Ecology. Section 3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDD&E) The SWMP will include an ongoing program to detect and remove illicit connections, discharges as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(2), and improper disposal, including any spills not under the purview of another responding authority, into the municipal separate storm sewers owned or operated by the City. The City will fully implement an ongoing illicit discharge detection and elimination program no later than August 19, 2011. The City will take the following actions and conduct the following activities: a. Development of MS4 Map: A municipal storm sewer system map will be developed no later than February 16, 2011. The municipal storm sewer system map will be periodically updated and will include the following information: i. The location of all known municipal separate storm sewer outfalls and receiving waters and structural stormwater BMPs owned, operated, or maintained by the City. The City will map the attributes listed below for all storm sewer outfalls with a 24 inch nominal diameter or larger, or an equivalent cross-sectional area for non-pipe systems: Packet Page 125 of 158 8 • Tributary conveyances (indicate type, material, and size where known). • Associated drainage areas. • Land use. ii. The City will initiate a program to develop and maintain a map of all connections to the municipal separate storm sewer authorized or allowed by the City after February 16, 2007. iii. Geographic areas served by the City’s MS4 that do not discharge stormwater to surface waters. iv. The City will make available to Ecology, upon request, the municipal storm sewer system map depicting the information required in i. through iii. above. v. Upon request, and to the extent appropriate, the City will provide mapping information to co-Permittees and secondary Permittees. b. IDD&E Ordinance: The City will develop and implement an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to effectively prohibit non-stormwater, illegal discharges, and/or dumping into the City’s municipal separate storm sewer system to the maximum extent allowable under State and Federal law. The ordinance or other regulatory mechanism will be adopted no later than August 16, 2009. i. The regulatory mechanism does not need to prohibit the following categories of non-stormwater discharges: • Diverted stream flows. • Rising ground waters. • Uncontaminated ground water infiltration (as defined at 40 CFR 35.2005(20)). • Uncontaminated pumped ground water. • Foundation drains. • Air conditioning condensation. • Irrigation water from agricultural sources that is commingled with urban stormwater. • Springs. • Water from crawl space pumps. • Footing drains. • Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands. • Non-stormwater discharges covered by another Permit. • Discharges from emergency fire fighting activities. ii. The regulatory mechanism will prohibit the following categories of non-stormwater discharges unless the stated conditions are met: Packet Page 126 of 158 9 • Discharges from potable water sources, including water line flushing, hyperchlorinated water line flushing, fire hydrant system flushing, and pipeline hydrostatic test water. Planned discharges will be de-chlorinated to a concentration of 0.1 ppm or less, pH-adjusted, if necessary, and volumetrically and velocity controlled to prevent re-suspension of sediments in the MS4. • Discharges from lawn watering and other irrigation runoff. These will be minimized through, at a minimum, public education activities (see Section 1) and water conservation efforts. • Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges. The discharges will be dechlorinated to a concentration of 0.1 ppm or less, pH- adjusted and reoxygenized if necessary, volumetrically and velocity controlled to prevent re-suspension of sediments in the MS4. Swimming pool cleaning wastewater and filter backwash will not be discharged to the MS4. • Street and sidewalk wash water, water used to control dust, and routine external building wash down that does not use detergents. The City will reduce these discharges through, at a minimum, public education activities (see section 1) and/or water conservation efforts. To avoid washing pollutants into the MS4, the City must minimize the amount of street wash and dust control water used. At active construction sites, street sweeping must be performed prior to washing the street. • Other non-stormwater discharges. The discharges will be in compliance with the requirements of the stormwater pollution prevention plan reviewed by the City, which addresses control of construction site de-watering discharges. iii. The City’s SWMP will, at a minimum, address each category in ii above in accordance with the conditions stated therein. iv. The SWMP will further address any category of discharges in i or ii above if the discharges are identified as significant sources of pollutants to waters of the State. v. The ordinance or other regulatory mechanism will include escalating enforcement procedures and actions. vi. The City will develop an enforcement strategy and implement the enforcement provisions of the ordinance or other regulatory mechanism. Packet Page 127 of 158 10 c. Ongoing IDD&E Program: The City will develop and implement an ongoing program to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, spills, illicit connections and illegal dumping into the City’s municipal separate storm sewer system. The program will be fully implemented no later than August 19, 2011 and will include: i. Procedures for locating priority areas likely to have illicit discharges, including at a minimum: evaluating land uses and associated business/industrial activities present; areas where complaints have been registered in the past; and areas with storage of large quantities of materials that could result in spills. ii. Field assessment activities, including visual inspection of priority outfalls identified in i, above, during dry weather and for the purposes of verifying outfall locations, identifying previously unknown outfalls, and detecting illicit discharges. • Receiving waters will be prioritized for visual inspection no later than three years from February 16, 2007, with field assessments of three high priority water bodies made no later than February 16, 2011. Field assessments on at least one high priority water body will be made each year thereafter. • Screening for illicit connections will be conducted using: “Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination: A Guidance Manual for Program Development and Technical Assessments”, Center for Watershed Protection, October 2004, or another methodology of comparable effectiveness. iii. Procedures for characterizing the nature of, and potential public or environmental threat posed by, any illicit discharges found by or reported to the City. Procedures will include detailed instructions for evaluating whether the discharge must be immediately contained and steps to be taken for containment of the discharge. Compliance with this provision will be achieved by investigating (or referring to the appropriate agency) within 7 days, on average, any complaints, reports or monitoring information that indicates a potential illicit discharge, spill, or illegal dumping; and immediately investigating (or referring) problems and violations determined to be emergencies or otherwise judged to be urgent or severe. iv. Procedures for tracing the source of an illicit discharge; including visual inspections, and when necessary, opening manholes, using mobile cameras, collecting and analyzing water samples, and/or other detailed inspection procedures. v. Procedures for removing the source of the discharge; including notification of appropriate authorities; notification of the property owner; technical assistance for eliminating the discharge; follow-up Packet Page 128 of 158 11 inspections; and escalating enforcement and legal actions if the discharge is not eliminated. Compliance with this provision will be achieved by initiating an investigation within 21 days of a report or discovery of a suspected illicit connection to determine the source of the connection, the nature and volume of discharge through the connection, and the party responsible for the connection. Upon confirmation of the illicit nature of a storm drain connection, termination of the connection will be verified within 180 days, using enforcement authority as needed. d. Public Information: The City will inform public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste. i. No later than August 19, 2011, the City will distribute appropriate information to target audiences identified pursuant to Section 1. ii. No later than February 16, 2009, the City will publicly list and publicize a hotline or other local telephone number for public reporting of spills and other illicit discharges. The City will keep a record of calls received and follow-up actions taken in accordance with Section 3.c.ii. through v. above; and will include a summary in the annual report (see section S9 of the City’s Permit, Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements). e. Program Evaluation and Assessment: The City will adopt and implement procedures for program evaluation and assessment, including tracking the number and type of spills or illicit discharges identified; inspections made; and any feedback received from public education efforts. A summary of this information will be included in the City’s annual report (see section S9 of the City’s Permit, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements). f. Training: The City will provide appropriate training for municipal field staff on the identification and reporting of illicit discharges into MS4s. i. No later than August 16, 2009, the City will ensure that all municipal field staff who are responsible for identification, investigation, termination, cleanup, and reporting illicit discharges, including spills, improper disposal and illicit connections are trained to conduct these activities. Follow-up training will be provided as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or Packet Page 129 of 158 12 requirements. The City will document and maintain records of the training provided and the staff trained. ii. No later than February 16, 2010, an ongoing training program will be developed and implemented for all municipal field staff, which, as part of their normal job responsibilities, might come into contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection to the storm sewer system will be trained on the identification of an illicit discharge/connection, and on the proper procedures for reporting and responding to the illicit discharge/connection. Follow- up training will be provided as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or requirements. The City will document and maintain records of the training provided and the staff trained. Overview of City of Edmonds (Section 3) Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program: a. Development of MS4 Map The Engineering division maintains a map in Autocad that shows city owned storm water systems throughout the City. A Microsoft Access database is maintained by the Public Works Department that records type, material, size and inverts where known. Any new construction of municipal facilities is required to be field surveyed. The Planning and Division maintains a Land Use map made using ArcGIS. These maps are available to Ecology, secondary and co-permittees, as well as, the public at any time. Paper copies of these maps are also available upon request. b. IDD&E Ordinance The City has an ordinance (Appendix B) implemented that effectively prohibit illegal discharges in to the City stormwater system. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 7.200.070 states; A. Prohibition of Illegal Discharges. No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal storm drain system or any watercourse any materials (including but not limited to pollutants or waters containing any pollutants that cause or contribute to a violation of applicable water quality standards) other than stormwater. Contaminants include but are not limited to the following: 1. Trash or debris; 2. Construction materials; 3. Petroleum products including but not limited to oil, gasoline, grease, fuel oil and heating oil; 4. Antifreeze and other automotive products; 5. Metals in either particulate or dissolved form; Packet Page 130 of 158 13 6. Flammable or explosive materials; 7. Radioactive material; 8. Batteries; 9. Acids, alkalis, or bases; 10. Paints, stains, resins, lacquers, or varnishes; 11. Degreasers and/or solvents; 12. Drain cleaners; 13. Pesticides, herbicides, or fertilizers; 14. Steam cleaning wastes; 15. Soaps, detergents, or ammonia; 16. Swimming pool or spa filter backwash; 17. Chlorine, bromine, or other disinfectants; 18. Heated water; 19. Domestic animal wastes; 20. Sewage; 21. Recreational vehicle waste; 22. Animal carcasses; 23. Food wastes; 24. Bark and other fibrous materials; 25. Lawn clippings, leaves, or branches; 26. Silt, sediment, concrete, cement or gravel; 27. Dyes (except as described below under “permissible discharges”); 28. Chemicals, including suspected metals, not normally found in uncontaminated water; 29. Any other process-associated discharge except as otherwise allowed in this section; 30. Any hazardous material or waste not listed above. The City Public Works Director has the ability to enforce violations under ECDC 7.200.140 Enforcement. Packet Page 131 of 158 14 The Current City codes do not prohibit the following: 1. Potable water including water from water line flushing and hydrant maintenance; 2. Uncontaminated water from crawl space pumps or footing drains; 3. Yard watering; 4. Dechlorinated swimming pool water; 5. Materials placed as part of an approved habitat restoration or bank stabilization project; 6. Natural uncontaminated surface water, springs or groundwater; 7. Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands; 8. Common practices for water well disinfection; 9. Discharges resulting from diffuse or ubiquitous sources such as atmospheric deposition; 10. Discharges resulting from dye testing authorized by the director; 11. Discharges which result from emergency response activities; 12. Air conditioning condensation; 13. Discharges permitted under an NPDES permit, waiver, or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the federal Environmental Protection Agency; 14. Other water sources not containing pollutants; 15. Other types of discharges as determined by the director. c. Ongoing IDD&E Program The City will develop and implement an ongoing program to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, spills, illicit connections and illegal dumping into the City’s municipal separate storm sewer system. The program will be fully implemented no later than August 19, 2011. d. Public Information The City has mailed out info on BMPs and illegal discharges to the following selected types of businesses; Food Service Businesses, Auto Repair Facilities, Auto Sales Businesses and Concrete Contractors. It has also distributed BMP information to all known violators of the Illegal Discharge Code. Many staff Packet Page 132 of 158 15 members of the City have been made aware of the hazards associated with illegal discharges. Prior to August 2011 the City will distribute appropriate information to all key target audiences listed in the Permit requirements. No later than February 16, 2009, the City will publicly list and publicize a hotline or other local telephone number for public reporting of spills and other illegal discharges. The City will keep a record of calls received and follow-up actions taken in accordance with NPDES Permit conditions and will include a summary in the annual report. e. Program Evaluation and Assessment The City’s Stormwater Engineering Program Manager responds to incidents and takes photos and documents who, what, when, where and how the incident occurred, as well as, how the incident was dealt with. All such information is logged into a spreadsheet included in the annual report (Appendix C) f. Training The City’s Stormwater Engineering Program Manager is the lead for identification, investigation, termination, cleanup, and reporting illicit discharges, including spills, improper disposal. The Stormwater Engineering Program Manager will ensure that all appropriate municipal field staff are trained prior to August 2009. Section 4: Controlling Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment and Construction Sites The City will develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff to its MS4 from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities. This program will be applied to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale. The program will apply to private and public development, including roads. The “Technical Thresholds” in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit will be applied to all sites 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale. The City will take the following actions and conduct the following activities: a. Ordinance: The program will include an ordinance or other enforceable mechanism that addresses runoff from new development, redevelopment, and construction site projects. Pursuant to S5.A.2. of the City’s Permit, in adopting this ordinance or other regulatory mechanism, existing City requirements to apply stormwater controls at smaller sites, or at lower thresholds than required pursuant to Section 4, will be retained. The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism will be in place no later than August 16, 2009. The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism will include, at a minimum: Packet Page 133 of 158 16 i. The Minimum Requirements, technical thresholds, and definitions in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit or an equivalent approved by Ecology under the NPDES Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit, for new development, redevelopment, and construction sites. Adjustment and variance criteria equivalent to those in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit will be included. More stringent requirements may be used, and/or certain requirements may be tailored to local circumstances through the use of basin plans or other similar water quality and quantity planning efforts. Such local requirements will provide equal protection of receiving waters and equal levels of pollutant control to those provided in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit. ii. A site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria that, when used to implement the minimum requirements in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit (or equivalent approved by Ecology under the Phase I Permit) will protect water quality, reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable and satisfy the State requirement under Chapter 90.48 RCW to apply all known, available and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment (AKART) prior to discharge. The City will document how the criteria and requirements will protect water quality, reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, and satisfy State AKART requirements. If the City chooses to use the site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, or an equivalent manual approved by the Department under the Phase I Permit, the City may cite this choice as its sole documentation to meet this requirement. iii. The legal authority, through the approval process for new development, to inspect private stormwater facilities that discharge to the City’s MS4. iv. Provisions to allow non-structural preventive actions and source reduction approaches such as Low Impact Development Techniques (LID), measures to minimize the creation of impervious surfaces and measures to minimize the disturbance of native soils and vegetation. Provisions for LID should take into account site conditions, access and long term maintenance. v. If the City chooses to allow construction sites to apply the “Erosivity Waiver” in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit, Minimum Requirement #2, the ordinance or regulatory mechanism will include appropriate, escalating enforcement sanctions for construction sites that provide notice to the City of their intention to apply the waiver but do not meet the requirements (including timeframe restrictions, limits on activities that result in non- Packet Page 134 of 158 17 stormwater discharges, and implementation of appropriate BMPs to prevent violations of water quality standards) to qualify for the waiver. b. Permitting Process: The program will include a permitting process with plan review, inspection and enforcement capability to meet the standards listed in (i) through (iv) below, for both private and public projects, using qualified personnel (as defined in Definitions and Acronyms). At a minimum, this program will be applied to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale. The process will be in place no later than August 16, 2009. i. Except as provided in Section 4.b.vii. below, review of all stormwater site plans for proposed development activities. ii. Except as provided in Section 4.b.vii. below, inspect, prior to clearing and construction, all known development sites that have a high potential for sediment transport as determined through plan review based on definitions and requirements in Appendix 7 of the City’s Permit, Identifying Construction Site Sediment Transport Potential. iii. Except as provided in Section 4b.vii. below, inspect all known permitted development sites during construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment controls. Enforce as necessary based on the inspection. iv. Inspect all permitted development sites upon completion of construction and prior to final approval or occupancy to ensure proper installation of permanent stormwater controls such as stormwater facilities and structural BMPs. Also, verify a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for maintenance is assigned. Enforce as necessary based on the inspection. v. Compliance with the inspection requirements in ii, iii and iv above will be determined by the presence and records of an established inspection program designed to inspect all sites and achieving at least 95% of scheduled inspections. vi. An enforcement strategy will be developed and implemented to respond to issues of non-compliance. vii. If the City chooses to allow construction sites to apply the “Erosivity Waiver” in Appendix 1 of the City’s Permit, Minimum Requirement #2, the City is not required to review the construction stormwater pollution prevention plans as part of the site plan review in (i) above, and is not required to perform the construction phase Packet Page 135 of 158 18 inspections identified in (ii) and (iii) above related to construction sites which are eligible for the erosivity waiver. c. Long-term Operation and Maintenance: The program will include provisions to verify adequate long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) of post-construction stormwater facilities and BMPs that are permitted and constructed pursuant to (b) above. These provisions will be in place no later than August 16, 2009 and will include: i. Adoption of an ordinance or other enforceable mechanism that clearly identifies the party responsible for maintenance, requires inspection of facilities in accordance with the requirements in (ii) through (iv) below, and establishes enforcement procedures. ii. The City will establish maintenance standards that are as protective or more protective of facility function than those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. For facilities which do not have maintenance standards, the City will develop a maintenance standard. (1) The purpose of the maintenance standard is to determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facilities required condition at all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between the period of inspections is not a Permit violation. (2) Unless there are circumstances beyond the City’s control, when an inspection identifies an exceedance of the maintenance standard, maintenance will be performed: • Within 1 year for wet pool facilities and retention/detention ponds. • Within 6 months for typical maintenance. • Within 9 months for maintenance requiring re-vegetation. • Within 2 years for maintenance that requires capital construction of less than $25,000. Circumstances beyond the City’s control include denial or delay of access by property owners, denial or delay of necessary permit approvals, and unexpected reallocations of maintenance staff to perform emergency work. For each exceedance of the required timeframe, the City must document the circumstances and how they were beyond their control. Packet Page 136 of 158 19 iii. Annual inspections of all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) permitted by the City according to Section 4.b. unless there are maintenance records to justify a different frequency. Reducing the inspection frequency will be based on maintenance records of double the length of time of the proposed inspection frequency. In the absence of maintenance records, the City may substitute written statements to document a specific less frequent inspection schedule. Written statements will be based on actual inspection and maintenance experience and will be certified in accordance with G19 of the City’s Permit, Certification and Signature. iv. Inspections of all new flow control and water quality treatment facilities, including catch basins, for new residential developments that are a part of a larger common plan of development or sale, every 6 months during the period of heaviest house construction (i.e., 1 to 2 years following subdivision approval) to identify maintenance needs and enforce compliance with maintenance standards as needed. d. Record Keeping: The program will include a procedure for keeping records of inspections and enforcement actions by staff, including inspection reports, warning letters, notices of violations, and other enforcement records. Records of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities will be maintained. The City will keep records of all projects disturbing more than one acre, and all projects of any size that are part of a common plan of development or sale that is greater than one acre that are approved after February 16, 2007. e. Availability of NOIs: The City will make available copies of the "Notice of Intent for Construction Activity" and copies of the "Notice of Intent for Industrial Activity" to representatives of proposed new development and redevelopment. The City will continue to enforce local ordinances controlling runoff from sites that are also covered by stormwater permits issued by Ecology. f. Training: No later than August 16, 2009, the City will verify that all staff responsible for implementing the program to control stormwater runoff from new development, redevelopment, and construction sites, including permitting, plan review, construction site inspections, and enforcement, are trained to conduct these activities. Follow-up training will be provided as needed to Packet Page 137 of 158 20 address changes in procedures, techniques or staffing. The City will document and maintain records of the training provided and the staff trained. Overview of City of Edmonds (Section 4) Program regarding Control of Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment and Construction Sites; a. Ordinance According to the City’s current Stormwater Management Code (Appendix D) (ECDC 18.30.020); BMPs shall be used to control and treat the quantity and quality of storm water before it leaves the site. BMPs are to comply with the standards of this chapter. Guidance for the design, implementation and maintenance of BMPs are provided in the 1992 Washington State Department of Ecology Storm Water Technical Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (the Technical Manual). This applies to new development and redevelopment. i. The minimum requirements and technical thresholds delineated in the City’s current Code are not equivalent to Appendix 1 of the NPDES Municipal Permit. The City will adopt an ordinance to address these requirements prior to August 2009. ii. The City’s current site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria does not meet the minimum requirements of Appendix 1 of the NPDES Municipal Permit. The City will develop a site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria that meets the NPDES Permit requirement prior to August 2009. iii. The City has legal authority, through the maintenance inspection program, to inspect private stormwater facilities that discharge to the City’s MS4. (ECDC 18.30.120 Maintenance Inspection Program.) iv. The City will develop an ordinance which has provisions to allow non- structural preventive actions and source reduction approaches such as Low Impact Development Techniques (LID), measures to minimize the creation of impervious surfaces and measures to minimize the disturbance of native soils and vegetation prior to August 2009. v. The City does not allow construction sites to apply for the “Erosivity Waiver”. b. Permitting Process The City has a permitting process with plan review, inspection and enforcement capability to meet the standards listed in (i) through (iv) below, for both private and public projects, using qualified personnel. All sites that are disturbed go Packet Page 138 of 158 21 through the permitting process. Every development/ construction project with more than one acre of disturbed soils is required to develop a SWPPP to be given to the City for review. The City’s Development Services Department reviews the SWPPP’s that come in. i. The City’s Development Services Department and the Department of Public Works reviews all stormwater site plans for proposed development activities. ii. The City’s Development Services Department inspects, prior to clearing and construction, all known development sites that have a high potential for sediment transport. iii. The City’s Development Services Department inspects all known permitted development sites during construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment controls. The City enforces when necessary based on the inspection. iv. The City’s Development Services Department inspector inspects all permitted development sites upon completion of construction and prior to final approval or occupancy to ensure proper installation of permanent stormwater controls such as stormwater facilities and structural BMP’s. Formal maintenance plans are not required at this time. Maintenance plans with responsibilities assigned, as and when necessary will be a requirement in the City prior to August 2009. v. Compliance with the inspection requirements in ii, iii and iv above is determined by the presence and records of an established inspection program designed to inspect all sites and achieving at least 95% of scheduled inspections. vi. The City’s Development Services Department has an enforcement strategy developed and implemented to respond to issues of non- compliance. vii. At this time the City does not allow construction sites to apply for the “Erosivity Waiver”. c. Long Term Operation and Maintenance i. The City has ordinances that clearly identify ownership, maintenance, repair, operation and inspection of private stormwater systems. ECDC 18.30.100 Maintenance requirements. ECDC 18.30.120 Maintenance inspection program. ii. The City of Edmonds currently uses the 1992 Ecology manual for guidance in regards to the issue of maintenance of storm systems. The City will establish maintenance standards that are as protective or more protective of facility Packet Page 139 of 158 22 function than those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. For facilities which do not have maintenance standards, the City will develop a maintenance standard, prior to August 15, 2009. iii. The City has a maintenance inspection program, but is not inspecting all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) on an annual basis. Prior to August 2009, the City will be on annual cycle of inspections of all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) permitted by the City according to Section 4.b. of the NPDES Permit conditions, unless there are maintenance records to justify a different frequency. iv. The City engineering technicians inspect new flow control and water quality facilities. Prior to August 2009, all new flow control and water quality treatment facilities, including catch basins, for new residential developments that are a part of a larger common plan of development or sale, will be inspected every 6 months during the period of heaviest house construction (i.e., 1 to 2 years following subdivision approval) to identify maintenance needs and enforce compliance with maintenance standards as needed. d. Record Keeping The City has a procedure for keeping records of inspections and enforcement actions by staff, including inspection reports, warning letters, notices of violations, and other enforcement records. Records of maintenance inspections and maintenance activities are maintained. The City inspects all new development property regardless of the size of the property. e. Availability of NOI’s The City Development Services Department has made available copies of the “Notice of Intent for Construction Activity” and copies of the “Notice of Intent for Industrial Activity” to representatives of proposed new development and redevelopment. The City enforces local ordinances controlling runoff from sites that are also covered by stormwater permits issued by Ecology. f. Training Edmonds Engineering inspectors have attended many formal workshops and training courses regarding Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) practices and inspections. New inspectors and plan reviewers receive formal training and also are provided considerable on-the-job-training regarding inspection practices and review of both ESC practices and permanent stormwater management facilities. On-the-job training is tracked and documented on advancement qualification checklists for Engineering Technicians. The City will provide additional formal and informal training and documentation and achieve compliance with the Training requirement prior to the deadline of August 2009. Packet Page 140 of 158 23 Section 5: Pollution Prevention and Operation and Maintenance for Municipal Operations By February 16, 2010, the City will develop and implement an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. The City will take the following actions and conduct the following activities: a. Maintenance Standards: The City will establish maintenance standards that are as protective, or more protective, of facility function than those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. For facilities which do not have maintenance standards, the City will develop a maintenance standard. i. The purpose of the maintenance standard is to determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facilities required condition at all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections and/or maintenance is not a Permit violation. ii. Unless there are circumstances beyond the City’s control, when an inspection identifies an exceedance of the maintenance standard, maintenance will be performed: • Within 1 year for wet pool facilities and retention/detention ponds. • Within 6 months for typical maintenance. • Within 9 months for maintenance requiring re-vegetation. • Within 2 years for maintenance that requires capital construction of less than $25,000. Circumstances beyond the City’s control include denial or delay of access by property owners, denial or delay of necessary permit approvals, and unexpected reallocations of maintenance staff to perform emergency work. For each exceedance of the required timeframe, the City will document the circumstances and how they were beyond their control. b. General Inspections: Annual inspection of all municipally owned or operated permanent stormwater treatment and flow control facilities, other than catch basins, and taking appropriate maintenance actions in accordance with the adopted maintenance standards. The annual inspection requirement may be reduced based on inspection records. Reducing the inspection frequency will be based on maintenance records of double the length of time of the proposed inspection frequency. In the absence Packet Page 141 of 158 24 of maintenance records, the City may substitute written statements to document a specific less frequent inspection schedule. Written statements will be based on actual inspection and maintenance experience and will be certified in accordance with G19 of the City’s Permit, Certification and Signature. c. Post-Storm Inspections: Spot checks of potentially damaged permanent treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) after major (greater than 24-hour-10-year recurrence interval rainfall) storm events. If spot checks indicate widespread damage/maintenance needs, inspect all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities that may be affected. Conduct repairs or take appropriate maintenance action in accordance with maintenance standards established above, based on the results of the inspections. d. Catch Basins and Inlet Inspections: Inspection of all catch basins and inlets owned or operated by the City at least once before the end of the City’s Permit term. Clean catch basins if the inspection indicates cleaning is needed to comply with maintenance standards established in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Decant water will be disposed of in accordance with Appendix 6 of the City’s Permit, Street Waste Disposal. Inspections may be conducted on a “circuit basis” whereby a sampling of catch basins and inlets within each circuit is inspected to identify maintenance needs. Include in the sampling an inspection of the catch basin immediately upstream of any system outfall. Clean all catch basins within a given circuit at one time if the inspection sampling indicates cleaning is needed to comply with maintenance standards established under Section 4.c., above. As an alternative to inspecting catch basins on a “circuit basis,” the City may inspect all catch basins, and clean only catch basins where cleaning is needed to comply with maintenance standards. e. Compliance: Compliance with the inspection requirements in a, b, c and d above will be determined by the presence of an established inspection program designed to inspect all sites and achieving inspection of 95% of all sites. f. Reduction of Stormwater Impacts: Establishment and implementation of practices to reduce stormwater impacts associated with runoff from streets, parking lots, roads or highways owned or Packet Page 142 of 158 25 maintained by the City, and road maintenance activities conducted by the City. The following activities will be addressed: • Pipe cleaning • Cleaning of culverts that convey stormwater in ditch systems • Ditch maintenance • Street cleaning • Road repair and resurfacing, including pavement grinding • Snow and ice control • Utility installation • Pavement striping maintenance • Maintaining roadside areas, including vegetation management • Dust control g. Policies and Procedures: Establishment and implementation of policies and procedures to reduce pollutants in discharges from all lands owned or maintained by the City and subject to the City’s Permit, including but not limited to: parks, open space, road right-of-way, maintenance yards, and stormwater treatment and flow control facilities. These policies and procedures will address, but are not limited to: • Application of fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides including the development of nutrient management and integrated pest management plans. • Sediment and erosion control. • Landscape maintenance and vegetation disposal. • Trash management. • Building exterior cleaning and maintenance. h. Training: Develop and implement an on-going training program for employees of the City whose construction, operations or maintenance job functions may impact stormwater quality. The training program will address the importance of protecting water quality, the requirements of the City’s Permit, operation and maintenance standards, inspection procedures, selecting appropriate BMPs, ways to perform their job activities to prevent or minimize impacts to water quality, and procedures for reporting water quality concerns, including potential illicit discharges. Follow-up training will be provided as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or requirements. The City will document and maintain records of training provided. Packet Page 143 of 158 26 i. Special Facility Requirements: Development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for all heavy equipment maintenance or storage yards, and material storage facilities owned or operated by the City in areas subject to the City’s Permit that are not required to have coverage under the Industrial Stormwater General Permit. Implementation of non-structural BMPs will begin immediately after the pollution prevention plan is developed. A schedule for implementation of structural BMPs will be included in the SWPPP. Generic SWPPPs that can be applied at multiple sites may be used to comply with this requirement. The SWPPP will include periodic visual observation of discharges from the facility to evaluate the effectiveness of the BMP. j. Record Keeping: Records of inspections and maintenance or repair activities conducted by the City will be maintained in accordance with S9 of the City’s Permit, Reporting Requirements. City of Edmonds Overview of Program for Section 5: Pollution Prevention and Operation and Maintenance for Municipal Operations: The City has an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a on the job training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. More training will be provided in this regard to fulfill the City’s requirement in this regard prior to February, 2010. a. Maintenance Standards The City has maintenance standards which are governed by ECDC 18.30.100 Maintenance requirements. The City will establish maintenance standards that are as protective, or more protective, of facility function than those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington prior to February, 2010. b. Post-Storm Inspections The City Surface Water Utility does spot checks of some potentially damaged permanent treatment and flow control facilities after major storm events. The City conducts repairs to systems immediately if it is necessary to protect the public health, safety, welfare or public resources. The City will continue to identify potential problem sites and will be in full compliance with this requirement prior to February 2010. Packet Page 144 of 158 27 d. Catch Basin and Inlet Inspections The City has inspected all Catch basins and inlets throughout the City at least once. The City Public Works Storm Division inspected over 78% of the 7,707 catch basins throughout the City in the year 2007 alone. The City is Planning on achieving a goal of an annual inspection cycle for all catch basins by February 2012 (although this is not a requirement for the permit). e. Compliance The City plans on being in full compliance with all the requirements (a,b,c, and d above) prior to February 2010. f. Reduction of Stormwater Impacts The City of Edmonds has participated in the past in the Regional Road Maintenance Endangered Species Act Program. In January 2002, twenty-four Washington State agencies (including WSDOT) formally submitted a joint routine road maintenance program to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) for approval under Limit 10 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) section 4(d) rule. The Regional Road Maintenance ESA Program Guidelines (Regional Program) describes physical, structural, and managerial best management practices designed so that when they are used, singularly or in combination, they reduce road maintenance activities’ impacts on water and habitat. For more information on this program please visit http://www.metrokc.gov/kcdot/roads/esa/index.cfm The City has solid policy and procedures to reduce stormwater impacts and will formalize those procedures and be in full compliance with the requirements prior to the February 2010 deadline. The City is considering using the Regional Road Maintenance Endangered Species Act Program Guideline manual as a guide for best management practices for the following: • Pipe cleaning • Cleaning of culverts that convey stormwater in ditch systems • Ditch maintenance • Street Cleaning • Road Repair and resurfacing, including pavement grinding • Snow and ice control • Utility installation • Pavement striping maintenance • Maintaining roadside areas, including vegetation management • Dust control Packet Page 145 of 158 28 g. Policies and Procedures The City has established and implemented many policies and procedures to reduce pollutants in discharges from lands owned or maintained by the City and subject to the NPDES permit. However the City is not in full compliance with this requirement. The City will achieve full compliance prior to February 2010. To achieve this goal, the City will consider using the Regional Road Maintenance Endangered Species Act Program Guideline manual as a guide for best management practices for the following • Application of fertilizer, pesticides, and herbicides including the development of nutrient management and integrated pest management plans • Sediment and erosion control • Landscape maintenance and vegetation disposal • Trash management • Building exterior cleaning and maintenance h. Training Some City staff in Public Works have taken courses affiliated with the Road Maintenance ESA Program,. These classes are University of Washington Civil Engineering Professional Development Courses. The materials from these classes are approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology and provide background for Erosion and Sediment Control (CESCL) certification. The training program addresses the importance of protecting water quality, the requirements of the permit, operation and maintenance standards, inspection procedures, selecting appropriate BMPs ways to perform their job activities to prevent or minimize impacts to water quality. The City’s Public Works staff have procedures for reporting water quality concerns, including potential illicit discharges. Additional formal and on- the-job-training will be provided as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or requirements. The City intends to the appropriate additional formal and informal training to comply with the Training requirement prior to the deadline of February 2010. i. Special Facility Requirements The City’s Public Works Department will develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for all heavy equipment maintenance or storage yards, and material storage facilities owned or operated by the City by February 2010. The City Public Works Department currently uses BMPs and prevents pollution from discharging into the storm water system. The SWPPP will include periodic visual observation of discharges from the facility to evaluate the effectiveness of the BMPs. j. Record Keeping Records of inspections and maintenance or repair activities conducted by the City will be maintained in accordance with S9 of the City’s Permit, Reporting Requirements. Packet Page 146 of 158 AM-1439 4. Definition of Local Public Facilities Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Duane Bowman Time:15 Minutes Department:Development Services Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Public Hearing on Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 3679 amending the definition of Local Public Facilities in ECDC 21.55.007. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Refer the matter to the Planning Board for review and recommendation. Previous Council Action In 2001, the City adopted Ordinance 3353 which established community facility zoning regulations, including a definition of local public facilities. On February 5, 2008, the City Council passed interim Ordinance 3679 amending the definition of local public facilities. Narrative Recently, the City issued a staff interpretation (Exhibit 2) of the zoning code definition of local public facilities which would allow private or for profit community facilities as a conditional use in single family residential zones. Staff does not believe that this was the intent of the City Council. The Council concurred and an interim zoning ordinance (Exhibit 1) was adopted on February 5, 2008 that closes this loophole in the code until the matter can be clearly reviewed. By law a public hearing on the interim zoning ordinance must be held within 60 days of the adoption of the ordinance. The public hearing was set for March 4, 2008. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Ordinance 3679 Link: Exhibit 2 - Local Public Facilities Interpretation Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 08:19 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/29/2008 09:09 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/29/2008 09:10 AM APRV Packet Page 147 of 158 Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 02/28/2008 05:40 PM Final Approval Date: 02/29/2008 Packet Page 148 of 158 Packet Page 149 of 158 Packet Page 150 of 158 Packet Page 151 of 158 Packet Page 152 of 158 Packet Page 153 of 158 MEMORANDUM Date: January 15, 2008 To: Interpretations File No. 2008-1 From: Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Subject: INTERPRETATION REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ARE A LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITIY. Date Issued/Posted: JANUARY 15, 2008 Effective Date: JANUARY 30, 2008 (unless appealed in a timely manner) Issue Outline: A question has been raised whether or not a private recreational facility fits the definition of a local public facility under the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Relevant Code Sections: 21.15.071 Community facilities. A. Community facilities mean any use, structure, building, or development that: 1. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by members of the general public for educational, religious, informational, recreational, artistic, or social purposes; or 2. Serves members of the general public by providing for utility, transportation, police, fire, and parking services; or 3. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by local, state, regional, or federal governments for the purpose of providing governmental services. B. Community facilities consist of churches, local public facilities, parks, and regional public facilities. C. Community facilities do not include animal hospitals, boarding houses, congregate care facilities, day care facilities, fraternities, foster homes, halfway houses, home occupations, hospitals, rooming houses, retirement homes, sororities, or similar medical, hospice, or care uses. [Ord. 3353 § 14, 2001]. 21.55.007 Local public facilities. Local public facilities mean any community facilities primarily sited, designed, constructed, and operated for the purpose of providing public health, safety and welfare services to the immediate area or neighborhood in which they are sited. Local public facilities include, but are not limited to: police stations, fire stations, branch libraries, bus stop shelters, electrical substations, water pump stations, community club houses, parks and recreation special use areas, branch governmental and administrative offices, service clubs, storage and associated maintenance buildings and yards. [Ord. 3353 § 16, 2001]. Packet Page 154 of 158 Analysis: The term “community facilities”, as defined in ECDC 21.15.071, establishes three criteria which identifies whether or not any use, structure, building, or development can be considered a “community facility”. Of the three tests, test number reads as follows, “1. Is primarily used or dedicated for use by members of the general public for educational, religious, informational, recreational, artistic, or social purposes;”. A private recreational facility which has membership open to the public fits this test as a use that is “recreational” and “social” in purpose. Next the term “local public facility”, as defined in ECDC 21.55.007, includes examples of “local public facilities” such as “police stations, fire stations, branch libraries, bus stop shelters, electrical substations, water pump stations, community club houses, parks and recreation special use areas, (emphasis added)branch governmental and administrative offices, service clubs, storage and associated maintenance buildings and yards”. A private recreational facility which has membership open to the public fits this definition. It is a club that serves as a recreational facility. THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING INTERPRETATION IS HEREBY ISSUED: THE TERM “LOCAL PUBLIC FACILITY” INCLUDES PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES THAT ARE OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR MEMBERSHIP, SUBJECT TO THE GRANT OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. Appeal Procedures: Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Sections 20.105.010 and 20.105.020, staff interpretations of the text of the ECDC are appealable decisions. Should anyone wish to appeal this interpretation, a written appeal, accompanied by the required appeal fee (see Planning Division fee handout) must be submitted within 14 calendar days of the date of issuance/posting of this interpretation. The deadline for filing an appeal of this interpretation is: JANUARY 30, 2008 . A written appeal must contain the following: 1) A reference to the decision being appealed. 2) The name and address of the person appealing, and his or her interest in the matter. 3) The reasons why the person appealing believes the interpretation to be inappropriate. Posted: 1) Edmonds City Hall, 2nd Floor – Development Services Department 2) Edmonds Library 3) Edmonds Post Office 0016_1439_2008-1_private recreational facilities.doc Page 2 Packet Page 155 of 158 AM-1415 6. Discussion and Potential Action Regarding the 2009 Edmonds City Council Retreat Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:03/04/2008 Submitted By:Jana Spellman Submitted For:Council President Michael Plunkett Time:15 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Action Review Committee: Action: Information Subject Title Discussion and potential action regarding the 2009 Edmonds City Council Retreat. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action During the 2008 Edmonds City Council Retreat a discussion ensued regarding the future location and date for the 2009 Retreat. Two possible dates were discussed for the 2009 Council Retreat. These date were Friday, February 6 and Saturday, February 7 and Friday, March 6 and Saturday, March 7. It was decided to continue the discussion of both items on a future Council agenda. Councilmember Wilson suggested the Chrysallis Inn and Spa in Bellingham. The Council President asked for cost comparisons using the Chrysallis Inn and Spa and recent Council retreat accommodation costs. These items are now before the Council for discussion and potential action. Exhibit 1: Cost Comparisons for Edmonds City Council Retreat Narrative These items have been brought forward for discussion and potential action as requested at the 2008 Council Retreat. Councilmember Bernheim has also requested a general discussion be held regarding future retreats. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Cost Comparisons for 2009 Council Retreat Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status Packet Page 156 of 158 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/25/2008 08:47 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/25/2008 08:49 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/25/2008 11:53 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 02/15/2008 10:00 AM Final Approval Date: 02/25/2008 Packet Page 157 of 158 Ed m o n d s C i t y C o u n c i l R e t r e a t C O S T C O M P A R I S O N S BA S E D O N 1 9 A T T E N D E E S Lo c a t i o n Ro o m R a t e p e r n i g h t I n c l u d e d i n R o o m R a t e O t h e r C h r g s . Me a l s Tr a v e l T i m e M i l e a g e R e i m b u r s e Su q u a m i s h C l e a r w a t e r R e s o r t $1 2 5 ( f o r 2 0 0 9 ) 1 C o n t i n e n t a l B r e a k f a s t Fr i . L u n c h B u f f e t : 45 m i n $ 1 0 . 0 0 / F e r r y $ 2 3 R T * Su q u a m i s h , W A Ta x i n c l u d e d i n r o o m r a t e . 1 B u f f e t B r e a k f a s t No C h a r g e I n c l . f e r r y T o t a l : $ 3 3 p e r p e r s o n 1 B u f f e t L u n c h Sa t . S a n d w i c h B u f f e t : Driver/Vehicle Only Me e t i n g R o o m $1 6 p e r p e r s o n Ba n q u e t R o o m AV e q u i p m e n t Ro o m r a t e 1 9 x $ 1 2 5 : $2 , 3 7 5 IT s u p p o r t b o t h d a y s . Lu n c h 1 d a y 1 9 @ $ 1 6 : $3 0 4 Co f f e e , T e a , W a t e r Mi l e a g e / f e r r y 1 9 @ $ 3 3 : $6 2 7 Wi r e l e s s Cl e a r w a t e r E s t . C o s t : $3 , 3 0 6 Ro o m R a t e p e r N i g h t I n c l u d e d i n R o o m R a t e O t h e r C h r g s Me a l s Tr a v e l T i m e M i l e a g e R e i m b u r s e La C o n n e r C h a n n e l L o d g e $1 3 2 . 0 0 2 C o n t i n e n t a l B r e a k f a s t s M t g . R o o m : $ 1 0 0 F r i . L u n c h B u f f e t : 2 h r s 3 0 m i n 1 1 4 m i x $ . 5 0 . 5 = $ 5 8 La C o n n e r , W A In c l . T a x o f $ 1 2 p e r r o o m W i r e l e s s i n t e r n e t Co f f e e / T e a / W a t e r $ 2 0 p e r p e r s o n $7 0 . 0 0 S a t . S a n d w i c h B u f f e t : Ro o m r a t e 1 9 x $ 1 3 2 : $2 , 5 0 8 Fl i p C h a r t : $2 0 p e r p e r s o n Mt g R o o m w / f l i p c h a r t : $1 2 4 $2 4 . 0 0 Co f f e e T e a W a t e r $7 0 Lu n c h 2 d a y s 1 9 x $ 2 0 e a . X 2 : $7 6 0 Mi l e a g e R T 1 9 x $ 5 8 $1 , 1 0 2 La C o n n e r E s t . C o s t : $4 , 5 6 4 Ro o m r a t e p e r n i g h t I n c l u d e d i n R o o m R a t e O t h e r C h r g s Me a l s Tr a v e l T i m e M i l e a g e R e i m b u r s e Ch r y s a l l i s I n n & S p a $1 6 8 . 0 0 1 b r e a k f a s t m u f f i n p e r d a y . Mt g . R o o m : $ 1 5 0 F r i . L u n c h B u f f e t : 2 h r s 6 0 m i n 1 5 0 m i x $ . 5 0 . 5 = $ 7 6 Be l l i n g h a m , W A In c l . T a x o f $ 1 4 p e r r o o m S t e a m r o o m $2 0 p e r p e r s o n Wi r e l e s s i n t e r n e t Sa t . S a n d w i c h B u f f e t : $2 0 p e r p e r s o n Ro o m r a t e 1 9 x $ 1 6 8 : $3 , 1 9 2 Mt g R o o m O N L Y : $1 5 0 Lu n c h 2 d a y s 1 9 x $ 2 0 e a . X 2 : $7 6 0 PL E A S E N O T E T H I S E S T I M A T E D O E S N O T I N C L U D E : Mi l e a g e R T 1 9 x $ 7 6 $1 , 4 4 4 IT S U P P O R T , W A T E R , T E A , C O F F E E , B R E A K F A S T S , A V E Q U I P M E N T C hr y s a l l i s I n n & S p a E s t . C o s t : $5 , 5 4 6 EXHIBIT 1 L: \ P r o d u c t i o n d b \ C C O U N C I L \ 0 0 1 8 _ 1 4 1 5 _ C o s t C o m p a r i s o n f o r 2 0 0 9 R e t r e a t . x l s Pa c k e t Pa g e 15 8 of 15 8