2010.02.16 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
FEBRUARY 16, 2010
6:45 p.m. - Executive session regarding negotiations for the potential purchase of real estate.
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-2808 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 2, 2010.
C. AM-2815 Approval of claim checks #116866 through #117013 dated February 4, 2010 for $543,160.45
and #117014 through #117179 dated February 11, 2010 for $444,455.31. Approval of payroll
direct deposit and checks #49059 through #49096 for the period of January 16 through
January 31, 2010 for $636,174.68.
D. AM-2786 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Alice Oates ($177.30), Nansi Karlsten
(amount undetermined), and Sara Twigg (amount undetermined).
E. AM-2810 Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the
Washington State Liquor Control Board, January 2010.
F. AM-2807 Citizen request to amend the September 3, 2002 City Council Minutes.
G. AM-2806 Report on final construction costs for the Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project and
Council acceptance of project.
H. AM-2805 Report on final construction costs for the Clay Feeder Project and Council acceptance of
project.
I. AM-2809 Acceptance of project for frontage improvements at NE corner of Dayton Street and Third
Avenue South.
J. AM-2814 Interlocal Agreement with State of Washington Department of Printing
K. AM-2817 Firdale Village: Rezone, Development Agreement, and NGPE.
3. AM-2812
(10 Minutes)
Confirmation of Mayor's appointment to the Architectural Design Board.
4.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings.
Packet Page 1 of 179
5. AM-2813
(20 Minutes)
City of Edmonds Website - City Council and Council Member Web Pages.
6. AM-2816
(45 Minutes)
Quasi Judicial Training by City Attorney.
7. AM-2811
(10 Minutes)
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of February 9, 2010.
8. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
9. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
Adjourn
Packet Page 2 of 179
AM-2808 2.B.
Approve 02-02-10 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 2, 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 02-02-10 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:31 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/10/2010 08:32 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:43 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 02/10/2010 08:28
AM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 3 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
February 2, 2010
At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Haakenson announced that the City Council would meet in executive session
regarding pending litigation. He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 15
minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action
was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the
executive session were: Mayor Haakenson, Councilmembers Orvis, Fraley-Monillas, Plunkett,
Bernheim, Peterson and Buckshnis. Others present were City Attorney Scott Snyder, Community
Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton and City Clerk Sandy Chase. The executive
session concluded at 6:45 p.m.
At 6:47 p.m., Councilmembers Orvis, Fraley-Monillas, Plunkett, Bernheim, Peterson and Buckshnis
interviewed Lois Jean Broadway, a candidate for appointment to the Architectural Design Board. The
interview was held in the Jury Meeting Room. Mayor Haakenson was also present for the interview. The
interview concluded at 6:58 p.m.
The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Steve Bernheim, Council President
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Graham Marmion, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Plunkett requested Item E be removed from the Consent Agenda and Council President
Bernheim requested Item F be removed.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO
APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
Packet Page 4 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 2
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 26, 2010.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #116698 THROUGH #116865 DATED JANUARY 28,
2010 FOR $448,651.69.
D. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL APPOINTMENT TO THE CITIZENS COMMISSION ON
COMPENSATION FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS.
G. ORDINANCE NO. 3782 – RENAMING KAIREZ DRIVE TO VISTA DEL MAR DRIVE,
AND DIRECTING STAFF TO MAKE THE APPROPRIATE CHANGES IN CITY
PLANNING DOCUMENTS, NOTIFICATION AND SIGNAGE.
ITEM E: TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORT.
Councilmember Plunkett asked into what fund Traffic Impact Fees were deposited. City Engineer Rob
English answered they were deposited into Fund 112. Councilmember Plunkett asked how the fees were
generated. Mr. English answered the impact fees provided mitigation for traffic impacts related to
development or a change in use.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM F. ORDINANCE NO. 3781 – AMENDING PROVISIONS OF ECDC 17.40.020(D)(3),
NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES, TO CORRECT A
SCRIVENER'S ERROR.
Council President Bernheim advised he pulled this item in order to vote no because he disagreed with the
methodology used to address it.
Mayor Haakenson explained the Council approved an ordinance a couple years ago when a condominium
on 3rd Avenue was being renovated. The developer had the choice of demolishing the building or doing
minor renovations such as adding bay windows. The Council supported making minor changes which
would allow the building to be retained and reused. At the time, the Council approved an ordinance that
they believed allowed bay windows on the north and east sides of the building. The ordinance as written
actually did not allow the bay windows, however, neither Council, staff nor the City Attorney realized it.
Subsequently staff sent a correction notice to the developer informing him the windows had to be
removed. Mr. Chave displayed a photograph of the building as it existed prior to the work and following
the addition of the bay windows.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the ordinance was adopted for a specific purpose. During the
Council’s discussion, his concern was that the bay windows not intrude on neighboring properties and he
suggested the intrusion be limited to half of the setback. The intrusions on the building in question were
not in the sideyard setback, they were in the street setback and as a result, the limitation subverted the
purpose. Mayor Haakenson clarified the Council felt it was a good idea, voted in favor of it but the
language did not allow it. Once the correction notice was sent out, staff researched the matter, and the
correction notice has been held in abeyance until the matter could be addressed by the Council.
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR
APPROVAL OF ITEM F.
Councilmember Orvis recalled this was reviewed by Council Committee and they did not have any issue
with it.
Packet Page 5 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 3
Council President Bernheim objected to presenting this to the Council as a scrivener’s error when it was a
substantive change in the law. He preferred to refer the matter to the Planning Board so it could be
deliberatively reviewed on its merits rather than simply changing the ordinance to what staff thought the
Council had approved.
Mayor Haakenson clarified it was not a change to what staff thought the Council wanted; it was a change
to reflect what the Council actually approved. Mr. Snyder explained it was his error, the requirement he
suggested was added at the Council meeting and the impacts were not thoroughly researched.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the difference between the ordinance passed in 2008 and the
proposed ordinance. Mayor Haakenson explained the ordinance passed in 2008 would not allow the bay
windows on the north side although the Council wanted to allow them. The proposed ordinance before
Council this evening would allow the bay windows on the north side of the building. Mr. Snyder
explained the limitation would only apply to the rear yard setback not to rights-of-way.
Councilmember Plunkett explained this action was manifesting the intent and will of the Council. Mr.
Snyder agreed, the intent was to make the ordinance fit the Council’s decision.
MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM VOTING NO.
3. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF ARTS DAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2010.
Mayor Haakenson read a proclamation in honor of Arts Day, February 2, 2010 and encouraged all
citizens to celebrate the arts. He presented the proclamation to Edmonds Arts Commissioner Mary
Monfort.
Ms. Monfort thanked the Council and Edmonds merchants for supporting the arts. She commented many
people outside the community recognize Edmonds as an arts community.
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3769 - DEFINING TEMPORARY
HOMELESS SHELTER, AND IDENTIFYING ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE TEMPORARY
HOMELESS SHELTERS ARE PERMITTED.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the GMA permits the adoption of interim ordinances and moratoria
by the City Council without a public hearing but requires a hearing be held within 60 days. This is the
required public hearing. He explained this is the original ordinance that clarified temporary homeless
shelters were permitted uses in conjunction with approved community sponsors.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, referred to a list of locations where free meals were available (Maplewood
Presbyterian Church on Sundays and Edmonds Lutheran Church on Wednesdays) and the location of the
Edmonds Food Bank at Edmonds Westgate Chapel. He explained several churches provided cold
weather emergency shelter and several service agencies also provided vouchers for motels. He reported
the Edmonds Food Bank served 525 people today.
Nancy Hopper, Edmonds, urged the Council not to pass ordinance Alternative B that would possibly
bring tent cities to Edmonds, noting the Council owed citizens a clear and concise document in order to
protect residents and property. Alternative B is quite vague and does not define the guidelines. For
example, the statement in Section N that managing agencies shall take all reasonable and legal steps to
obtain verifiable identification from prospective encampment residents to determine whether they are sex
offenders as well as do warrant checks from appropriate agencies. She commented a person living in a
Packet Page 6 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 4
tent city should be required to provide the necessary identification and have a background check
performed, assuming anyone who did not provide identification was concealing something. She
concluded Alternative B contained many other shortfalls to protect the safety and security of Edmonds
residents and to preserve the property values of homes adjacent to church properties.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, supported allowing churches to operate emergency cold weather shelters but
did not support allowing tent cities in Edmonds.
Rowena Miller, Edmonds, commented the ordinance appeared to have adequate regulations to address
tent cities in the manner they were regulated by other nearby cities. She commented it was safer to have
people residing in a tent city than to have them wandering around.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
Mr. Snyder explained that due to the sensitivity of the tent city issue, he rewrote “Alternative B” as an
ordinance to be reviewed by the Planning Board. The interim ordinance under discussion does not apply
to tent cities. He suggested citizens interested in the topic of tent cities participate in the Planning Board
process. The interim ordinance regarding homeless shelters will also be reviewed by the Planning Board.
He emphasized the State Supreme Court has held, specifically in the Woodinville case, that a tent city is a
part of religious practice and cannot be kept out of a city. The purpose of the ordinance is to provide
reasonable protections.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether a person had a legal right to be unidentified. Mr. Snyder
answered a person had the constitutional right to travel. The City’s ability to regulate that is limited; the
ordinance is structured such that it is the organizer’s responsibility to keep track of who resides in the
facility. Councilmember Plunkett asked what right the organizer had to require identification. Mr.
Snyder compared it to the right of a hotel to require registration or a pawn shop to require registry. When
the ordinance was returned to the Council, he assured the constitutional limitations could be discussed in
more detail. He summarized the City would be required to show a compelling state interest in order to
gather that information or prohibit a resident on that basis.
Councilmember Wilson clarified the interim ordinance did not address tent cities. However, a church
could operate a tent city on its property now without the City’s ability to infringe on it based on the First
Amendment of the Constitution. The City can establish a regulatory process that would permit that type
of establishment and via that regulatory process request agencies such as a church to ensure the residents
have identification and background checks. He summarized the City could not address Ms. Hopper’s
concerns unless and until such an ordinance were adopted. He encouraged her to participate in that
discussion at the Planning Board level. He commented the City could be sued for disallowing a tent city
but if tent cities are allowed with restrictive regulations, it was unlikely the City would be sued.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the definition of temporary homeless shelters, recalling the Fire
Marshal expressed concern with churches that did not have fire sprinklers. Mr. Snyder answered the City
Council adopted an ordinance that amended the State Building Code to permit legal nonconforming
churches to operate temporary emergency shelters. That action amended the Chapter 18 provisions and
did not require the same formality as a change to the Zoning Code.
Mayor Haakenson advised no further Council action was necessary at this time; the interim ordinance
would be forwarded to the Planning Board for review and recommendation.
Packet Page 7 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 5
5. PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3775 - AMENDING TITLE 20 ECDC,
REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES, TO EXPAND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CLOSED
RECORD ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Council passed an interim zoning ordinance on January 5
that was intended to revert some of the Title 20 changes approved in mid 2009 to what the code allowed
prior to the passage of that ordinance. Subsequent to the passage of the interim ordinance on January 5,
staff reviewed the ordinance and identified additional corrections. The Council could re-pass the interim
ordinance to correct those items tonight or the Council could forward the issue onto the Planning Board.
The advantage of making the corrections tonight was to adopt a correct version of the interim ordinance.
Mr. Chave reviewed the proposed changes:
Prior to and after the Title 20 changes were made, the short plat approval process was a staff
approval with appeal to the Hearing Examiner. Final short plat approval was a staff approval as it
was simply checking off that the conditions of the preliminary approval had been met and it had
not been sent to the Council for approval. Under the interim ordinance, final short plat approvals
go to the Council. This would delay the process as it has existed in the past. The first two items
in his memo to the Council would return that process to what has been in effect for a number of
years.
Temporary buildings are a staff approval that goes to the Hearing Examiner on appeal. The
interim ordinance provides for an additional appeal process which he anticipated was counter to
the intended process.
The code previously enabled appellants to recover appeal fees. That was advertently omitted in
the Title 20 revisions.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the first proposed change clarified the Council gave final plat
approval on formal plats, subdivision with more than four lots. With regard to appeal fees, Chapter
20.105 previously provided for appeal fees but it referenced Council appeals. When Council appeals
were removed, the chapter was revoked. If Council appeals are reinstated, it would be appropriate to
reinsert that provision. He referred to the issue Mr. Reidy raised that a citizen was required to appeal a
code enforcement action to obtain an administrative hearing. He agreed with his assertion that if the code
were not violated, their appeal fee should be returned. He summarized the proposed change would allow
the return of the appeal fee to apply to City Council proceedings as it has in the past and to clarify that the
appeal fee is also returned in a civil enforcement process.
With regard to temporary buildings, Mr. Snyder explained there was a limit of one appeal; currently it
was to the Hearing Examiner. The Council could choose to have the appeal come to the Council but there
could not be an additional appeal from the Hearing Examiner to the Council.
Councilmember Orvis clarified temporary buildings or short plats were not appealable to the Council
before the Council passed the Title 20 changes. Mr. Chave agreed. Mr. Snyder clarified final formal
plats come to the Council with a recommendation. Councilmember Orvis observed the proposed changes
would return Title 20 to the process utilized before the original revisions were made. Mr. Chave agreed,
noting that was what staff understood the Council’s intent to be on January 5. Mr. Snyder pointed out in
addition he had included language regarding the City’s civil enforcement process which was not
addressed in the past but was related to the return of appeal fees. Mr. Chave summarized if the Council
approved the revised interim ordinance, staff believed it would reestablish the process that existed prior to
June 2009 when the changes to Title 20 were made.
Council President Bernheim asked whether Council adoption of the revised interim ordinance would be
subject to another public hearing. Mr. Snyder answered this was the public hearing on the interim
Packet Page 8 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 6
ordinance. The interim ordinance will then be reviewed by the Planning Board for public hearing and
returned to the Council with their recommendation. The interim ordinance will only be in effect for
approximately five more months.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, commented his position on the interim ordinance was well known. When the
Council voted, he requested they state their reasons for or against.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, questioned whether the proposed process would allow a final appeal to the
City Council of a Hearing Examiner’s decision on an appeal of a staff decision. He also questioned who
would be allowed to appeal the Hearing Examiner’s decision to the City Council, whether it would be
staff or the appellant. With regard to returning the fee, he questioned whether the fee paid by an appellant
who prevailed at the Hearing Examiner would be returned.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, reported he has attended numerous Hearing Examiner hearings in the past. He
was in favor of a process that allowed an appellant to appeal to the City Council rather than the court. He
anticipated this would save money for the City as well as the appellant. He remarked on the requirement
to speak at the Hearing Examiner hearing in order to be a party of record.
Betty Larman, Edmonds, spoke in favor of returning to the process where appeals were heard by the
City Council.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
Mr. Snyder summarized the interim ordinance would be reviewed by the Planning Board and be returned
to the Council for adoption as a permanent ordinance. If the Council wanted to consider broadening the
return of appeal fees, he suggested the Planning Board confer with the Planning Department and the
Finance Department with regard to the cost. He explained the City incurs costs when decisions are
appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If the appeal fee was returned, it was likely the application cost would
need to be revised to cover those costs.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS,
TO APPROVE THE UPDATED INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3783.
Council President Bernheim acknowledged the intent was to return the process to the way it was. He was
concerned with amending ordinances on the fly, such as adding the return of the Hearing Examiner appeal
fees. Although he was in favor of it in principle, he was unsure whether it was appropriate to address it
along with the return of appeal fees to the Council. He suggested it could be addressed via amendment to
Chapter 20.110 where the Hearing Examiner procedures are addressed.
Councilmember Peterson reiterated the concern he expressed on January 5 that the ordinance was hastily
written. He agreed interim ordinances were appropriate in some instances but these additional changes
were the result of not having a complete process. He planned to vote against the proposed interim
ordinance, noting the Planning Board considered this issue in detail previously and recommended the
changes via a 6-1 vote. He was frustrated with comments the changes to Title 20 took away the power of
the people, emphasizing the importance of a Hearing Examiner and the courts to do things that a part-time
Council may not always do correctly. He summarized that was the Planning Board’s advice to the
Council, the advice of the Association of Washington Cities as well as countless other organizations.
Packet Page 9 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 7
This issue has been thoroughly reviewed by not only Edmonds but other municipalities and changing the
procedure was a disservice to the process.
Councilmember Wilson agreed with Councilmember Peterson that the Council was in this position
because the interim ordinance was developed on the fly on January 5; if the Council had taken more time,
it would not be in this position. Although he supported keeping appeals at Council, he disagreed that the
public was being taken out of the process by having appeals heard by the Hearing Examiner. He
expressed support for having testimony on closed record appeals provided in writing. He planned to vote
against the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas indicated she would support the ordinance because she favored having
appeals heard by the City Council. A process where appeals are heard by the Hearing Examiner and then
appealed to court created a separation between the haves/haves not; people who cannot afford to appeal to
court will lose and those who can afford an appeal to court will win.
Councilmember Plunkett commented when citizens are required to appeal to court, it took citizens out of
important land use decisions. He disagreed with the suggestion that the Council should not hear appeals
because they did not do it right; the Council has done it right in the past and will do it right in the future.
He supported the motion, concluding citizens should have the right to appeal to the City Council.
Councilmember Orvis echoed Councilmember Plunkett’s comments and agreed the previous ordinance
restricted the public’s access to the Council. He commented on the importance of citizens having the
friendly, low cost opportunity to appeal to the Council.
Councilmember Wilson pointed out the Council had moved appeals to the Hearing Examiner for other
decisions such as PRDs. He recalled Ms. Petso criticized the City in 2002 for moving PRD appeals from
the Council to the Hearing Examiner. He recommended the Council address those instances in the future,
expressing support for PRD appeals being reviewed by the Council rather than the Hearing Examiner. He
expressed concern with a process where some appeals were to the Hearing Examiner and others to the
Council, preferring they all be the same.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the motion. She disagreed it was being amended on the
fly as the ordinance had been discussed for quite some time. She supported allowing elected officials to
hear citizens’ appeals rather than having them heard by the Hearing Examiner and then Supreme Court.
Councilmember Orvis reported the Community Services/Development Services Committee will be
considering other areas where appeals could be to the City Council.
MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON AND PETERSON VOTING NO. The
ordinance adopted reads as follows:
INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 3783 OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
INTERIM ORDINANCE 3775 AND TITLE 20 ECDC, REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES,
TO EXPAND OPPORTUNITIES FOR CLOSED RECORD ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS, AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
6. PUBLIC HEARING TO ESTABLISH THE PROCESS TO SURPLUS A PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT UTILITY VEHICLE, THREE (3) PUMP STATION EMERGENCY POWER
GENERATORS AND VARIOUS WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITY EQUIPMENT
Public Works Director Noel Miller explained the Public Works Utilities Division currently owns
equipment that is no longer useful to the utilities. He displayed a list of the assets. RCW 35.94.040
Packet Page 10 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 8
requires that the Council hold a public hearing and by resolution declare such assets surplus. Staff plans
to contract with James G. Murphy to auction all equipment and to use a sealed bid process to sell the
surplus vehicle for the minimum values as shown on Exhibit A. Staff recommends that following the
public hearing, the Council adopt the resolution declaring the listed assets, originally acquired for utility
purposes, to be surplussed to the needs of the City and authorizing the Public Works Director to sell such
surplus assets.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, suggested an estimated value be established for the surplus property, a
timeframe for submitting bids be established and advertised, and the item sold to the highest bidder. He
also recommended the City state how the proceeds from the sale would be used.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1221, DECLARING CERTAIN ASSETS
ORIGINALLY ACQUIRED FOR UTILITY PURPOSES TO BE SURPLUS TO THE NEEDS OF
THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SELL SUCH
SURPLUS ASSETS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, referred to the comment that the haves would be treated more fairly than the
haves not, noting during the past four years whenever the Council heard appeals, the citizen lost. With
regard to the comment that citizens would have access to the Council under the revised process, he
pointed out the citizens would not have access to the Council because the appeal to the Council is quasi
judicial. In response to Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ rebuttal to the comments he made at the
January 26 Council meeting, he clarified he did not claim she did not read Ms. Broadway’s application
for the Planning Board, he stated that she did not interview Ms. Broadway as all other Councilmembers
did. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas found a reason in Ms. Broadway’s application that she did not
disclose to reject Mayor Haakenson’s nomination of an applicant who he classified as the best qualified
applicant in his ten years as Mayor. As a result it was perceived Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was
influenced via an illegal rolling quorum. Next, he referred to Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’s assertion
that he opposed the interim ordinance the Council passed January 5 because he had consistently been on
the other side of the issue. He agreed, noting the reasons for opposing the Council’s January 5 decision
had nothing do with the merits for or against it. His opposition was to the process by which it was
accomplished which gave the perception of another illegal rolling quorum. The instant selection of Diane
Buckshnis led to the perception of a third illegal rolling quorum, a process wherein Councilmember
Fraley-Monillas did not even vote for the candidate she nominated.
Rowena Miller, Edmonds, commented she had been watching the Council meetings on television but
came tonight to share three things with the Council. First, she was glad the Council appeared to really
care about citizens’ concerns. Second, she was glad the Council had honest differences and took the time
to voice their differences. Third, she was glad the Council was discussing the possibility of campaign
finance reform. She urged the Council to also consider publicly funded campaigns, explaining the
legislature passed an enabling bill that would allow the City Council to establish such a process subject to
voter approval. She summarized publicly financed campaigns increased the public’s trust. She advised
further information was available by googling Washington Public Campaigns.
Packet Page 11 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 9
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, recalled several months ago in response to the Council’s request, he submitted
information regarding citizens’ right to speak to the Council. Next he announced the Council retreat on
Friday and Saturday, February 5 and 6 beginning at 9:00 a.m. He suggested the Council provide an
opportunity for citizens attending the retreat to provide written comment. He provided the City’s
telephone number, 425-775-2525, to obtain further information regarding the retreat.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, disagreed with Councilmember Wilson’s response that his comment about
Councilmembers receiving a large campaign contribution was condescending. He expressed concern
with Mr. Wambolt’s perceptions, noting he did not appear to be providing factual information.
8. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CODE TITLE 18.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained last year the Council amended Title 20, which addresses land use
appeals, to clarify the appeal procedures and to make it more citizen friendly including adding a matrix.
Title 18 addressed engineering processes such as sewer connections, dangerous trees, use of the public
right-of-way, and other ministerial functions for which there is little discretion and appeals are typically to
the Hearing Examiner. As a result of the Hearing Examiner recommendation, staff presented the lack of a
proper reference in the appeals section in Title 18.000.20 to the Community Services/Development
Services Committee.
When Title 20 was revised, staff did a word search and corrected all references to Title 20. However,
many of the older provisions did not have any reference. When the corrections were being made, he
considered Title 18 section by section, not to change things but add a reference to a hearing. The Council
packet includes a matrix that identifies recommended amendments to provide a reference and a draft
ordinance. He acknowledged this was a complex subject and the Council may want broader notice, a
different appeal route, etc. He highlighted two sections where the Engineering Department can authorize
a grade in excess of 12% up to 14%. One is for driveways; no notice is required and staff suggests adding
an appeal process. The second is for a street grade which staff felt property owners in which the adjacent
area may have an interest. The proposed amendment would provide notice to property owners within
300 feet who may be inconvenienced by a steep grade. He summarized staff plans to schedule a public
hearing after the Council provides direction.
Councilmember Orvis commented it was his understanding many of these items were ministerial and
there was little discretion. Mr. Snyder answered they were typically ministerial. For most of the permits,
if attached to a PRD or subdivision, there was a process and an appeal. However, these often arise in
single family development permits, an office remodel, home remodel, etc. and there is no generalized
notice and appeals are typically filed by the applicant. The intent was to provide a process for appeal to
the Hearing Examiner; the current appeal process is unclear.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the indication of “correct reference” in the matrix. Mr. Snyder
responded there were typically two changes be made, either a person had the right to an on the record
appeal to the Hearing Examiner or for an enforcement action, they have the right to appeal the
enforcement violation via the civil enforcement process.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the column in the matrix “appeal proposed,” and asked if that was a
new appeal process. Mr. Snyder responded for some it was a new appeal process, for others it was the
appeal process that was currently provided. He clarified his intent was not to make a change but to clarify
where appeals were made.
Packet Page 12 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 10
Councilmember Orvis inquired about traffic impact fees. Mr. Snyder answered there was already notice
provided. The City has an expert report adopted by the Council and updated periodically that establishes
traffic impact fees based on national categories and standards. A developer who thinks the fee has been
miscalculated can appeal it to the Hearing Examiner. Establishing the impact fee is a Council legislative
function which includes a public hearing with notice. If a developer wants to appeal their fee, no notice is
provided. An example of an appeal would be a developer who disagreed with the category of use used to
determine the fee.
Councilmember Orvis observed some Hearing Examiner appeals had been added. Mr. Snyder agreed, the
goal was to provide an appeal for every decision and because these were ministerial, they were via an
open record appeal or civil enforcement matter to the Hearing Examiner.
Councilmember Orvis asked whether state law regulates who makes decisions on ministerial issues. Mr.
Snyder answered no. The Council could handle appeals differently, they were to the Hearing Examiner in
most jurisdictions because “time is money” for a developer or homeowner with a building permit.
Council President Bernheim asked if this had been reviewed by the Planning Board. Mr. Snyder
answered no, changes to Title 18 were not Zoning Code changes and did not require Planning Board
review. Council President Bernheim suggested staff provide a redline version illustrating the changes.
Mr. Snyder agreed to provide a redline version to the Council.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to Section 18.50.030, Street Map, and questioned the statement
“City Council if standalone.” Mr. Snyder stated a standalone amendment was something like the Kairez
Drive name change. An amendment to the Official Street Map via a Comprehensive Plan amendment
would be part of the yearlong Comprehensive Plan amendment process that included a public hearing.
Council President Bernheim asked whether the Community Services/Development Services Committee
(Councilmembers Orvis and Peterson) would be willing to review the proposed changes. Councilmember
Orvis suggested scheduling a separate Community Services/Development Services Committee meeting.
Councilmember Peterson agreed. Councilmember Orvis offered to work with staff on a date for the
meeting. Councilmember Buckshnis volunteered to assist with the review. Mr. Snyder offered to provide
the current language and changed language in a format with one change per page which may be more user
friendly for the public than a redline.
9. FIRDALE VILLAGE NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION EASEMENT (NGPE) - STAFF
DIRECTION ON PROPOSED REVISIONS.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the Council approved a development agreement with an attached
NGPE. The NGPE was consideration for vesting under the development agreement; the development
agreement which preserved the large stand of trees helped to satisfy the rezone criteria. He explained the
concerns expressed by Councilmember Orvis with regard to the NGPE have been addressed by Mr.
Shapiro. Mr. Shapiro raised the issue of soil nails that would be used in the construction of retaining
walls which would not have been allowed under the last draft.
The proposed change would allow the temporary use of soil nails on the periphery of the NGPE. He
asked whether that was within the scope of what the Council approved or if the Council wanted to
schedule another public hearing regarding the development agreement and rezone.
Mr. Snyder explained staff reviewed the tree inventory and found 18% of the trees in the NGPE are large
Douglas Firs with a radius of greater than 20 inches; the remainder are fruit trees. If one of the small fruit
trees dies, a 3:1 replanting ratio is appropriate. However if one of the large Douglas Firs dies, the impact
Packet Page 13 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 11
would be significant. The proposed revisions would allow soil nails to be used only if a certified arborist
said they would not harm the trees and if a tree was damaged or died within one year of the work, a tree
less than 18 inches radius would be replaced on the 3:1 ratio and if one of the large trees died, the
developer would pay a fine of $5,000.
Councilmember Plunkett asked why the use of soil nails was not indicated in the original proposal. Tony
Shapiro, Shapiro Architects, answered there was language in the original proposal that stated no
construction underneath the NGPE would be permitted. Their attorney felt the language was sufficient
and would allow soil nailing or underpinning tiebacks. He on the other hand was concerned and did not
want any problems to arise in the future. The intent of the NGPE was not to have any structures below
grade which resulted in the language stating no underground construction would be permitted. However,
underpinning would be required to construct the adjacent building. Mr. Snyder explained his intent by
the original language was to ensure a parking garage was not constructed under the NGPE that could
undermine the large Douglas Firs.
Mr. Shapiro described the process of soil nailing. An auger drills a 12-16 inch diameter hole into the side
of the hill 20+ feet; a cable is inserted into the hole, filled with concrete and tension is placed on the cable
that supports the shoring on the perimeter. When the job is complete, the tension is relieved and the
concrete stays intact. The soil nailing should not harm or impact the root structure of the trees. He added
that the underpinnings can be engineered to occur away from the trees.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the intent was to determine if this met the Council’s original intent
or whether it was such a dramatic change that required a new process. Mr. Snyder explained his intent
with the language was to prevent a parking garage or other major structure. If the Council wished, the
public hearing on the development agreement and rezone could be re-noticed and the 60 day time period
for compliance reset.
Councilmember Plunkett asked why Mr. Shapiro felt the revision conformed to the original proposal. Mr.
Shapiro responded the NGPE would not be inhabited; it would be solely for temporary construction
activity. He explained the borings would be infrequent and would not damage the trees. An arborist they
consulted felt the borings would not damage the trees but recommended a specific layout be provided.
The revision included language requiring review and approval by an arborist. Once the building floor
was in place, it would support the wall.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether any damage would be done to the tree roots during the soil
nailing. Mr. Shapiro explained they would likely use back-pinning in which a hole is drilled adjacent to
the 20-foot zone and an I-beam dropped in. The soil is then excavated 6-8 feet to expose the I-beams and
a horizontal drill is made into the cut which is filled with concrete and cable and tensioned. The augers
for the back-pinning are done 4-8 feet below the surface. He acknowledged it may interrupt some roots
but the frequency of the holes were such that any direct impacts could be avoided. Fir trees do not have
major tap roots and their roots are primary at the surface.
Mr. Snyder explained the two protections are, 1) to have an arborist review the plan, and 2) if a tree died
within a year, there would be a $5,000 fine.
Councilmember Wilson wanted to strengthen the requirement, recognizing that Mr. Shapiro may not be
the person overseeing the development of the project if the property were sold. He commented the one
year timeframe was too short and the $5,000 penalty was not an appropriate value for replacing the tree.
He anticipated a tree could be damaged but would not die within a year. Subterranean erosion may
undermine the stability of the tree causing it to blow down in a windstorm but that may not occur in one
year. He suggested requiring a significant bond for a 5-year period. Mr. Snyder responded the Council
Packet Page 14 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 12
could direct staff to negotiate a longer time period and/or large amount and if that was not successful,
schedule a public hearing and reconsider the development agreement. Councilmember Wilson agreed
with Mr. Snyder’s suggestion to renegotiate with the developer, noting he did not find it a substantive
enough change that required a public hearing.
Mr. Shapiro did not anticipate any subterranean voids would occur. The hole is drilled and within a
couple hours a cable and concrete is inserted in the hole. Any opportunity for the ground to settle and fill
the hole was unlikely.
Mr. Snyder offered to confer with the City’s Arborist to determine the value a 20 inch radius Douglas Fir
would have on a trespass to trees action. His intent was to establish a large enough amount that would
provide some mitigation to the neighborhood. Councilmember Wilson asked the cost to replace that large
a tree. Mr. Snyder responded there was no way to transplant a 90 foot Douglas Fir. Councilmember
Wilson concluded if the tree was priceless, a $5,000 penalty was not enough.
Councilmember Peterson asked whether damage or the death of an 18 inch or larger Douglas Fir would
also include 3:1 replacement or only the $5,000 fine. Mr. Snyder advised the 3:1 replacement as well as a
$5,000 fine would be required. The tree survey identified the tree species and tree replacement would be
in kind. Councilmember Peterson echoed Councilmember Wilson concerns regarding the timeframe and
the penalty amount. He did not find the concrete pinning changed the scope of the Council’s approval
and was satisfied with proceeding without another public hearing.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Peterson and Wilson. She asked what
value there would be to scheduling another public hearing, commenting she did not want to delay the
progress of Firdale Village. She recalled during the previous public hearing there was not a great deal of
discussion regarding the trees.
Student Representative Marmion questioned the definition of “damaged,” asking whether the damage
would have to be obviously detrimental to the tree’s health. Mr. Snyder answered he would defer to the
arborist. He assumed damage below the surface would be evident in the foliage. He suggested
establishing a process whereby a neutral third party certified arborist would determine whether the tree
had been damaged. Councilmember Wilson suggested the agreement include a definition of damaged,
noting there have been differences of opinion between arborists regarding what constitutes damage. Mr.
Snyder suggested establishing a functionality standard based on providing a screen to the neighboring
properties. Councilmember Wilson commented screening was not the only issue, if the trees were
removed, the stormwater impacts would be significant.
To Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ comment, Councilmember Wilson noted there may not have been
much discussion regarding the trees during the public hearing process; however, the trees have been
central to the rezone, not just screening but also stormwater runoff, etc. He would not have supported the
rezone if the trees had not been a central part of the project. Mr. Snyder commented under the original
development agreement, there were no intrusions into the NGPE and any damage or death of a tree would
have been natural. By authorizing some intrusion via the soil nailing, there is some risk.
Council President Bernheim commented until the original development agreement the trees in the NGPE
were protected without any intrusion. Mr. Shapiro explained most of the roots of a fir tree are on the
surface, within the upper 10 feet. The cut 20-feet from the property line would be 40-60 feet down. The
soil nailing would be far below any roots that support the trees above. Any impact on the trees from
incursion into the area would be minimal and extra effort would be taken to engineer the shorings as far
away from adjacent trees as possible to minimize any impact in the upper 10 feet of the root structure.
Packet Page 15 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 13
Council President Bernheim reiterated initially the NGPE was a protected area and if any trees fell, it was
an act of God and not the result of building activity. He asked how long the temporary shoring would be
in place before the area was returned to its natural state. Mr. Shapiro assured the natural state of the area
would not be damaged, the activity would be below the surface.
Council President Bernheim commented he wanted to be fair to the developer and not delay development.
He feared this would be a license for an unscrupulous subsequent developer to remove the trees for
$5,000 each if they wanted to get rid of them. He was concerned with construction exceptions that could
threaten the trees. He asked whether the shoring would be removed after the construction was complete.
Mr. Shapiro replied the underpinning would remain in place, the tension would be removed. He did not
foresee any damage occurring to the trees nor could he foresee a developer wanting to remove the trees
because the trees were an asset to the project.
Councilmember Peterson thanked Mr. Shapiro for bringing this issue to the Council even though their
attorney felt the language was sufficient. He asked if the NGPE was considered in the LEED designation
for the project. Mr. Shapiro assumed the trees in the NGPE would contribute to the LEED assessment,
explaining LEED balances the deposal of debris from demolished buildings, removal of trees on site, etc.
Councilmember Wilson suggested Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Chave, Mr. Snyder and he develop changes that
would be acceptable to the Council. If the Council deemed those changes required reopening the public
hearing process, it could be done at that time.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the soil nailing would be down 40-60 feet and she did not
anticipate it would damage the trees. She summarized all her questions had been answered and she
supported moving forward.
For Councilmember Plunkett, Mr. Shapiro advised the trees were on the north property line.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether there would be a territorial view from the third or fourth floor of
the building if the trees were removed. Mr. Shapiro agreed there would.
Council President Bernheim suggested the group Councilmember Wilson suggested bring back a proposal
within 4 weeks. Mr. Snyder explained if the Council took that long, the public hearing may as well be re-
noticed because the easement must be recorded within 60 days in order for the development agreement
and rezone to be valid. Mr. Snyder suggested recording the easement in the form approved and negotiate
in good faith for a better product.
Council President Bernheim summarized the easement would be recorded in the form approved and the
parties would negotiate a change based on the developer’s desire to have construction flexibility and the
Council’s desire to accommodate the construction with suitable safeguards. Mr. Shapiro advised that
would be acceptable. It was the consensus of the Council to proceed in this manner.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson reported the memorial bench with a plaque honoring former Councilmember Peggy
Olson had been installed outside the City Council office. He thanked everyone who contributed.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
To the comment Student Representative Marmion made at the last meeting regarding campaign
contributions, Council President Bernheim acknowledged even if campaign contributions were limited as
he proposed, groups could spend their own money in favor of candidates. For example a person who had
Packet Page 16 of 179
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
February 2, 2010
Page 14
already provided the maximum contribution could buy their own yard sign, publish ads in the newspaper,
etc. He acknowledged that was a potential problem with establishing limits on campaign contributions
but there was no way to design a perfect system.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented it was nice to see Rowena Miller at tonight’s meeting. She
was glad to see the Council working together, commenting the Council was proceeding in a good
direction.
Councilmember Peterson reported the Mayor’s Climate Change Committee was meeting on Thursday,
February 4 and moving forward with great ideas, some of which would be discussed at the Council
retreat. He thanked the members of the Climate Change Committee for their diligence.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported Councilmember Fraley-Monillas and she plan to begin a monthly
Town Hall meeting to solicit public input. She invited citizens to email questions/comments to the
Council website. Their intent was to get more citizens involved and find out what they want.
Student Representative Marmion thanked Council President Bernheim for addressing his question. He
agreed there was no way to address his concern because it was a constitutional issue.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:19 p.m.
Packet Page 17 of 179
AM-2815 2.C.
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposit and checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Debbie Karber Time:Consent
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #116866 through #117013 dated February 4, 2010 for $543,160.45 and
#117014 through #117179 dated February 11, 2010 for $444,455.31. Approval of payroll direct
deposit and checks #49059 through #49096 for the period of January 16 through January 31, 2010
for $636,174.68.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and payroll direct deposits and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2010
Revenue:
Expenditure:1,623,790.44
Fiscal Impact:
Claims: $987,615.76
Payroll: $636,174.68
Attachments
Link: Claim ck 2-4-10
Link: Claim cks 2-11-10
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 12:44 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/11/2010 12:50 PM APRV
Packet Page 18 of 179
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 02:23 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 02/11/2010 12:32
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/11/2010
Packet Page 19 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116866 2/4/2010 041695 3M XAM3522 SS07621 Street - 1 Roll Black 30"x50YD
Street - 1 Roll Black 30"x50YD
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 183.75
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 17.45
Total :201.20
116867 2/4/2010 072627 911 ETC INC 168004 JAN-10 911 DATABASE MAINT
Jan-2010 911 database maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 101.50
Total :101.50
116868 2/4/2010 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 277321 RODENT CONTROL
MEADOWDALE CC - RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 82.12
RODENT CONTROL277357
RODENT CONTROL/ BEACH FRONTS
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 93.08
Total :175.20
116869 2/4/2010 068201 ACTIVE NETWORK INC 4100000690 MAINTENANCE RENEWAL
CLASS MAINTENANCE RENEWAL
001.000.640.574.200.480.00 10,852.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.200.480.00 1,031.01
Total :11,883.72
116870 2/4/2010 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND FEBRUARY 10 ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 2/10 EDMONDS AC
ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 2/10
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 2,032.66
Total :2,032.66
116871 2/4/2010 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES 09-735 JANITORIAL SERVICE
JANITORIAL SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 334.00
1Page:
Packet Page 20 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :334.00116871 2/4/2010 071177 071177 ADVANTAGE BUILDING SERVICES
116872 2/4/2010 001528 AM TEST INC 57504 Sewer - Pump Station Svc Fee
Sewer - Pump Station Svc Fee
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 300.00
Total :300.00
116873 2/4/2010 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 10749 ENGRAVED PLATES
ENGRAVED PLATES FOR TREE MEMORIALS
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 47.85
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 6.50
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 5.16
PLAQUE10759
CAST BRONZE PLAQUES:OLSON, HARDAN
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 318.80
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 7.50
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 31.00
Total :416.81
116874 2/4/2010 069829 AMIDO, BENJAMIM AMIDO11960 UKULELE CLASSES
UKULELE #11960
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 254.80
Total :254.80
116875 2/4/2010 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON0130 GYM MONITOR
ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR FOR DANCE
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00
Total :36.00
116876 2/4/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4727925 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 29.87
9.5% Sales Tax
2Page:
Packet Page 21 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116876 2/4/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.84
Total :32.71
116877 2/4/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4715771 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 92.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 8.83
Total :101.78
116878 2/4/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4683834 PW Mats
PW Mats
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.75
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.17
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 6.65
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 6.65
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.63
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.64
3Page:
Packet Page 22 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116878 2/4/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4695948
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.43
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4708177
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 15.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 1.47
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4720202
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.85
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.56
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4727926
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06
Total :113.37
116879 2/4/2010 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0038832-IN 01-7500014
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,653.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 252.10
Total :2,905.70
116880 2/4/2010 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 043487 alerton system-PW
alerton system-PW
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,541.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 146.42
4Page:
Packet Page 23 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,687.67116880 2/4/2010 064807 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC
116881 2/4/2010 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 53985 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 150.11
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 150.11
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 154.66
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 480.45
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 480.45
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 14.26
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 14.26
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 14.69
Total :1,458.99
116882 2/4/2010 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON BAILEYS12129 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO: TOT #12129
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 192.40
TAEKWON DO: TOT #12133
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 120.25
TAEKWON DO #12143
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 520.80
TAEKWON DO #12147
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 520.80
Total :1,354.25
116883 2/4/2010 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2008-897 INV#2008-897 EDMONDS PD 1/25 EXAM
PRE EMPLOY SCREENING - 1/25/10
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 150.00
5Page:
Packet Page 24 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :150.00116883 2/4/2010 012005 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH
116884 2/4/2010 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011347107 COPIER RENTAL
COPIER RENTAL
001.000.230.512.501.450.00 154.40
Total :154.40
116885 2/4/2010 002258 BENS EVER READY 1998 INV#1998 EDMONDS PD
SERVICE 5-5 EXTINQUISHERS
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 36.00
RECHARGE 5 EXTINQUISHERS
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 60.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 9.12
Total :105.12
116886 2/4/2010 071633 BLACK ROCK CABLE INC 14801 Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW to 3000
Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW to 3000
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 470.00
Franchise fee on Fiber Lease
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 23.50
Total :493.50
116887 2/4/2010 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 786087 INV#786087- EDMONDS PD - CAMERON
L/S SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 269.61
SGT CHEVRONS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.50
SERVICE BARS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.65
UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 325.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 58.54
INV#786337 - EDMONDS PD - MILLER, LP786337
S/S UNIFORM SHIRTS
6Page:
Packet Page 25 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116887 2/4/2010 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 131.32
CORP CHEVRONS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 12.95
INV#787294 - EDMONDS PD - COLLINS, AJ787294
511 L/S SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 99.98
HEAT STAMP POLICE ON BACK
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.00
511 TDU P/C RIP PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.53
INV#787294-01 - EDMONDS PD - COLLINS, AJ787294-01
511 TDU P/C RIP PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.80
INV#791289 - EDMONDS PD - PAULSON791289
UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 108.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 10.31
INV#791663 - EDMONDS PD - PAULSON791663
T-NECK NAVY SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.79
INV#792304 - EDMONDS PD - ROBINSON, J792304
SS ACADEMY SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 29.60
511 TDU P/C RIP PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 79.98
T-SHIRTS
7Page:
Packet Page 26 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116887 2/4/2010 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 7.00
APPLY LETTERS TO GARMENTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.90
SWEATSHIRT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.00
APPLY LETTERS TO GARMENT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 13.00
SWEATPANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 17.72
SHORT JERSEY KNIT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.10
L/S LOOSE GEAR SHIRT- NAVY
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 29.99
L/S LOOSE GEAR SHIRT-WHITE
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 29.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 24.06
Total :1,475.20
116888 2/4/2010 060141 BRANOM INSTRUMENT 422540 3083
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 150.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.91
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 14.81
Total :170.72
116889 2/4/2010 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BROCKMANN11789 PILATES/YOGA CLASSES
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT #11789
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 408.98
YOGA #11753
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 700.35
YOGA #11745
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 341.60
8Page:
Packet Page 27 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116889 2/4/2010 (Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
YOGA #11748
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 708.40
Total :2,159.33
116890 2/4/2010 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC RNH9451 Cisco 8pt Gbit Switch
Cisco 8pt Gbit Switch
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 456.68
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 43.38
Total :500.06
116891 2/4/2010 068484 CEMEX 9418573123 Roadway - Asphalt
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 245.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 23.28
Total :268.28
116892 2/4/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 152100 HELIUM
HELIUM
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 191.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 18.23
Total :210.20
116893 2/4/2010 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT11997 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #11997
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 78.40
Total :78.40
116894 2/4/2010 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 23065838 STATEMENT #23065838, ACCT#7898305185
FUEL FOR NARCOTICS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 170.06
LATE FEE/CHARGE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 41.77
9Page:
Packet Page 28 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :211.83116894 2/4/2010 003710 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS
116895 2/4/2010 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS ENG20090365 E6DA.ROW Permit 15806-75th Place W
E6DA.ROW Permit 15806-75th Place W
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 260.00
Total :260.00
116896 2/4/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7977 INV#7677 CUST# 45 - EDMONDS PD
NITRILE GLOVES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 87.00
STROBE SAFETY GLASSES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 47.40
VIONEX TOWELLETTES
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 80.00
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 19.84
Total :234.24
116897 2/4/2010 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-279832 2203 N 205TH ST
2203 N 205TH ST
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 15.74
Total :15.74
116898 2/4/2010 063389 CLAY, JON Feb-2009 Clay/Uniform
Clay/Uniform
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 268.68
Total :268.68
116899 2/4/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2153914 Fac Maint - Floor Pads, Alcohol, TT,
Fac Maint - Floor Pads, Alcohol, TT,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 452.94
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.03
Fac Maint - Deoderizers, Towels,W2153916
Fac Maint - Deoderizers, Towels,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 559.91
9.5% Sales Tax
10Page:
Packet Page 29 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116899 2/4/2010 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 53.19
Total :1,109.07
116900 2/4/2010 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0110 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT
VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT AT EDMONDS
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 168.00
Total :168.00
116901 2/4/2010 070323 COMCAST 0721433 CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES
CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 113.44
Total :113.44
116902 2/4/2010 065891 CONLEY, LISA CONLEY0125 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUB
PRESCHOOL SUB FOR MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.410.00 145.00
Total :145.00
116903 2/4/2010 062891 COOK PAGING WA 7798865 pagers-water
pagers-water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 3.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 0.29
Total :4.24
116904 2/4/2010 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING JAN 2010 DRY CLEANING/LAUNDRY 12/09-01/10 EDMONDS
DRY CLEANING 12/09 & 01/10
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 808.22
Total :808.22
116905 2/4/2010 073087 DAVENPORT, TONI DAVENPORT11894 GOURD ART
GOURT ART - INTRODUCTION
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 91.80
Total :91.80
116906 2/4/2010 061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 194834 FAC - Pressure Vessel Cert
11Page:
Packet Page 30 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116906 2/4/2010 (Continued)061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES
FAC - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 165.60
Boys & Girls Club - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 20.70
City Park - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 103.50
City Hall - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 20.70
Library - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 70.70
Museum -Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 41.40
PS - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 144.90
FS 20 - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 41.40
MCH Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 20.70
PW - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 82.80
Sr Center - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 82.80
WWTP - Pressure Vessel Cert
411.000.656.538.800.480.11 194.90
Yost - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 103.50
FS 16 - Pressure Vessel Cert
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 62.10
Total :1,155.70
116907 2/4/2010 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS January 2010 JANUARY 2010 DRS
January 2010 DRS
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 136,172.89
Total :136,172.89
12Page:
Packet Page 31 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116908 2/4/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3070 MINUTE TAKING
01/26 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 234.00
Total :234.00
116909 2/4/2010 006844 DMCJA FAI2010 DMCJA MEMBERSHIP JUDGE FAIR
DMCJA MEMBERSHIP JUDGE FAIR
001.000.230.512.500.490.00 375.00
Total :375.00
116910 2/4/2010 064640 DMCMA COO2010 DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR COOK
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR COOK
001.000.230.512.500.490.00 40.00
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR FEREBEEFER2010
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR FEREBEE
001.000.230.512.500.490.00 150.00
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR IVANJACKIVA2010
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR IVANJACK
001.000.230.512.501.490.00 40.00
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR JACOBSONJAC2010
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR JACOBSON
001.000.230.512.500.490.00 40.00
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR LEYDALEY2010
DMCMA MEMBERSHIP FOR LEYDA
001.000.230.512.501.490.00 40.00
Total :310.00
116911 2/4/2010 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 012010 STATE LOBBYIST JANUARY 2010
State lobbyist January 2010
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 4,135.00
Total :4,135.00
116912 2/4/2010 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 10-00556 Water Quality - Lab Samples
Water Quality - Lab Samples
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 984.00
Total :984.00
13Page:
Packet Page 32 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116913 2/4/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 18079 SUPPLIES
TERMINALS, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.84
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.22
SUPPLIES18277
PLASTIC CLEANER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.74
SUPPLIES18278
MICROFIBRE TOWEL
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.19
Total :24.76
116914 2/4/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 18019 Water - Belt for Exhaust Fan at 5
Water - Belt for Exhaust Fan at 5
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.00
Total :11.48
116915 2/4/2010 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS COE-HUD-004 PFD REIMB EXP HUD GRANT B-08-SP-WA-0097
Reimbursement to ECA/EPFD for HUD Grant
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 42,157.71
Total :42,157.71
116916 2/4/2010 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 13140 CHAMBER MAILING LABELS
CHAMBER MEMBER MAILING LABELS
001.000.640.575.510.310.00 30.00
Total :30.00
116917 2/4/2010 007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC E715630 Physical testing services
Physical testing services
14Page:
Packet Page 33 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116917 2/4/2010 (Continued)007905 EDMONDS FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 53.00
Physical testing servicesE715630-1
Physical testing services
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 585.00
Total :638.00
116918 2/4/2010 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-00025 CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 126.36
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 209.12
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 184.69
MINI PARK6-00475
MINI PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 377.32
CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 655.37
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 154.89
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
15Page:
Packet Page 34 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116918 2/4/2010 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 258.56
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 89.61
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 161.83
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
WATER6-04425
8100 185TH PL SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 277.78
SIERRA PARK6-04450
SIERRA PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 197.50
BALLINGER PARK6-07775
BALLINGER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 174.09
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 643.57
YOST PARK POOL6-08525
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 480.61
Total :4,537.74
116919 2/4/2010 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 052017 MK0653
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 169.08
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 16.06
Total :185.14
116920 2/4/2010 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 052064 Copy machine maint 12/24-124/2010
16Page:
Packet Page 35 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116920 2/4/2010 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
Copy machine maint 12/24-124/2010
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 119.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.510.522.100.480.00 11.35
Total :130.83
116921 2/4/2010 073088 EMERALD CITY MODEL AND TALENT Ref000211461 BUS LIC REFUND #00211496
Bus Lic Refund #00211496
001.000.000.257.310.000.00 25.00
Total :25.00
116922 2/4/2010 071967 ENG, STEPHEN ENG11867 TAEKWON DO
TAEKWON-DO BEGINNING
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 155.40
Total :155.40
116923 2/4/2010 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0058902-IN INV#0058902-IN, ACCT#0011847 EDMONDS PD
BADGE TIE TACK, 30 YR
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 62.00
BADGE TIE TACK, 20 YR
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 28.00
BADGE TIE TACK, 15 YRS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 56.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.36
Total :157.36
116924 2/4/2010 066004 ESRI 92090687 SDE for GIS data base sharing
SDE for GIS data base sharing
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 10,000.00
Freight
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 8.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 950.85
Total :10,959.72
17Page:
Packet Page 36 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116925 2/4/2010 071572 EVIDENT CRIME SCENE PRODUCTS 51497A INV#51497A - EDMONDS PD
GUN BOXES
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 96.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 39.00
Total :135.00
116926 2/4/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU18969 Water - Supplies
Water - Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 0.51
Total :5.85
116927 2/4/2010 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 013110 PUBLIC DEFENDER
PUBLIC DEFENDER
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 12,370.00
Total :12,370.00
116928 2/4/2010 010660 FOSTER, MARLO 13 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,156.80
Total :1,156.80
116929 2/4/2010 072796 GIPPERT, WINFIELD GIPPERT0122 BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER
BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER @ ANDERSON
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 78.00
Total :78.00
116930 2/4/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9163116032 PS - Casters, Wheels
PS - Casters, Wheels
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.44
Total :51.22
116931 2/4/2010 012560 HACH COMPANY 6567006 229817
18Page:
Packet Page 37 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116931 2/4/2010 (Continued)012560 HACH COMPANY
MOUNTING KIT
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 305.90
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 26.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 31.62
Total :364.47
116932 2/4/2010 064721 HATZENBUHLER, HAROLD 11 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
617.000.510.522.200.230.00 1,343.80
Total :1,343.80
116933 2/4/2010 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I2659120 Water - Meter boxes, Lids, Risers
Water - Meter boxes, Lids, Risers
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 2,150.70
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 45.16
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 208.61
Total :2,404.47
116934 2/4/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 2031318 0205
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 173.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.53
02052080434
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 47.84
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.54
02052080487
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.86
19Page:
Packet Page 38 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116934 2/4/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.75
020530166
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.07
02055049450
TORCH BLADES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.94
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.79
02056047106
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.27
LUMBER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.91
02059030437
BROOMS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.92
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.03
02059034766
SHRUBS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.30
LATE FEEFCH-003587489
LATE FEE
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 20.00
Total :477.52
116935 2/4/2010 067369 HUMANN, JENNIFER 2/3/10 Door Monitoring services 2/3/10 (Civil
Door Monitoring services 2/3/10 (Civil
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 24.00
20Page:
Packet Page 39 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :24.00116935 2/4/2010 067369 067369 HUMANN, JENNIFER
116936 2/4/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 81270729 COPIER LEASE
COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 426.17
COPIER LEASE81295981
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 25.93
Total :452.10
116937 2/4/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 81295978 C/A 467070-1003748A4
Finance Copier Rental 1/22-2/21/10
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07
Per copy charge 11/23-12/2//08
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 142.49
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 56.68
Total :653.24
116938 2/4/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5013389509 Small Reception copier - copies
Small Reception copier - copies
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 8.69
Total :8.69
116939 2/4/2010 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 6423748 C/A 768421
PR1-1 City Phone Service thru 1/25/09
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 946.34
Total :946.34
116940 2/4/2010 068737 JOHNSON ROBERTS & ASSOC 113083 INV#113083 EDMONDS PD
PRE-OFFER PHQ REPORTS (2)
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 24.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 1.39
Total :25.39
116941 2/4/2010 065056 JOHNSON, TROY JOHNSON0130 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
21Page:
Packet Page 40 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116941 2/4/2010 (Continued)065056 JOHNSON, TROY
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR~
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 30.00
Total :30.00
116942 2/4/2010 063501 KENS CAMERA INC 52919 INV#52919, ACCT#16778 - EDMONDS PD
IMAGE SCAN #76-1202
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 84.00
REPRINTS
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 8.40
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 5.00
8.9% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 8.96
Total :106.36
116943 2/4/2010 073086 KIMMEL ATHLETIC SUPPLY CO 0281958-IN SOFTBALLS
SOFTBALLS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 3,002.00
Freight
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 75.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 292.32
Total :3,369.32
116944 2/4/2010 069355 KLEINFELDER INC 624781 C-311 THRU 1/3/2010
C-311 ODOR CONTROL IMPROVEMENT
414.000.656.594.320.410.10 619.00
Total :619.00
116945 2/4/2010 064953 KRUGMIRE, DAVID Q4-09 Tuition Q4-2009
Tuition Q4-2009
001.000.510.522.200.490.00 780.00
Total :780.00
116946 2/4/2010 073089 KVM GALORE 3619 KVM over IP 8 Port Switch
KVM over IP 8 Port Switch
22Page:
Packet Page 41 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116946 2/4/2010 (Continued)073089 KVM GALORE
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 719.00
SMB Server Interface Module SIM USB
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 759.00
Total :1,478.00
116947 2/4/2010 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 01212010-01 INV#01212010-01 - EDMONDS PD
28 CAR WASHES @ $5.03 - 12/09
001.000.410.521.220.480.00 140.84
Total :140.84
116948 2/4/2010 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 1010-260 NITRILE GLOVES
NITRILE GLOVES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 165.75
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.31
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.44
Total :189.50
116949 2/4/2010 072059 LEE, NICOLE 515 INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 119.41
Total :119.41
116950 2/4/2010 069594 LINK PIPE INC 5599 Sewer - Link Pipe
Sewer - Link Pipe
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3,806.00
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 155.00
Total :3,961.00
116951 2/4/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 103360 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 20.25
Total :20.25
23Page:
Packet Page 42 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116952 2/4/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 103327 Special order grommets for IT work bench
Special order grommets for IT work bench
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 123.96
Freight
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 10.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 12.82
Total :147.73
116953 2/4/2010 019583 MANPOWER INC 19772109 Temp for Ross Funeral 4.5 hrs week
Temp for Ross Funeral 4.5 hrs week
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 73.58
Total :73.58
116954 2/4/2010 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 298 INTERPRETER FEES
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES299
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES688
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES691
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES692
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES694
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES695
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEES696
24Page:
Packet Page 43 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116954 2/4/2010 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
Total :706.00
116955 2/4/2010 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 35771 YOST SUPPLIES
O-RING LEAF TRAP, SAND & SILT BAGS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 58.82
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.59
CEMETERY SUPPLIES35773
SILK TABS/CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 85.95
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 8.17
Total :158.53
116956 2/4/2010 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 45462471 123106800
PIPE FITTING/GLOVES
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 114.54
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.90
12310680045578131
HOSE/PLUG FITTING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 63.90
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.71
Total :191.05
116957 2/4/2010 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 101580 SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM PROJECT
TRENCHER, LOADER, TRAILER RENTALS FOR
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 233.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 22.22
SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM SUPPLIES101616
TRACKHOE/TRAILER
25Page:
Packet Page 44 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116957 2/4/2010 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 202.12
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 19.20
Total :477.44
116958 2/4/2010 072991 MOE, CHELSY MOE012510 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUB
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUBJANUARY 25-28
001.000.640.575.560.410.00 160.00
Total :160.00
116959 2/4/2010 072492 MOLINA, NILDA MOLINA11920 ZUMBA CLASSES
ZUMBA #11920
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 589.05
Total :589.05
116960 2/4/2010 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 2863185 SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM PROJECT
TEMPORARY PANELS FOR SEAVIEW RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 728.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 69.20
Total :797.60
116961 2/4/2010 072606 NET INC 00126007 CANDY FILLED EASTER EGGS
EASTER CANDY FILLED EGGS
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 240.00
Total :240.00
116962 2/4/2010 070788 NETRIVER INC 3032 BIRDFEST WEB HOSTING
Birdfest webhosting quarterly fees
120.000.310.575.420.410.00 35.85
Total :35.85
116963 2/4/2010 065779 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS INC TI-0217696 Street Signs - Stop
Street Signs - Stop
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1,020.60
26Page:
Packet Page 45 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,020.60116963 2/4/2010 065779 065779 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS INC
116964 2/4/2010 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S3212091.001 SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOMS
SUPPLIES FOR SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.12
SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM SUPPLIESS3214534.001
SUPPLIES FOR SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 39.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.72
Total :55.80
116965 2/4/2010 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S3205591.001 2091
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 72.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.90
2091S3209666.002
ELECTRICAL PANEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 1,388.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 131.86
Total :1,599.36
116966 2/4/2010 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-073806 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 183.47
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-073988
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: HICKMAN PARK
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 214.47
Total :397.94
116967 2/4/2010 070306 OBERG, WILLIAM 12 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 44.00
27Page:
Packet Page 46 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :44.00116967 2/4/2010 070306 070306 OBERG, WILLIAM
116968 2/4/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 118041 INV#118041 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
DAY PLANNER - COMPAAN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.30
LOGITECH MOUSE
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 25.99
FOAM WRIST PAD
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 6.14
DATER, SELF INKING
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 18.63
3M SIGN HERE POST IT NOTES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.56
MANILA FOLDERS, LETTER SIZE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.39
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.09
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 3.05
Total :82.15
116969 2/4/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 121090 Office Supplies - HR
Office Supplies - HR
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 18.70
Office Supplies - CSD
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 98.14
Copy paper
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 19.89
Copy paper
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 19.89
Copy paper
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 19.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 3.67
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.310.00 11.21
28Page:
Packet Page 47 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116969 2/4/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 1.89
Total :193.28
116970 2/4/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 037207 Office supplies DSD
Office supplies DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 161.20
Sales tax credit on 12/3/09 432942432942
Sales tax credit on 12/3/09 432942
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -10.68
Total :150.52
116971 2/4/2010 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Jan 2010 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
Emergency Medical Services & Trauma
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,218.94
PSEA 1,2,3
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 29,533.07
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 36.00
State Patrol Death Investigations
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 675.81
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 4,339.20
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 269.00
washington auto theft
001.000.000.237.250.000.00 2,368.21
traumatic brain injury
001.000.000.237.260.000.00 460.04
Total :38,900.27
116972 2/4/2010 064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO SS06279G210 PW Elevator Operations Maint Contract
PW Elevator Operations Maint Contract
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 2,100.90
9.5% Sales Tax
29Page:
Packet Page 48 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116972 2/4/2010 (Continued)064951 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 199.59
Total :2,300.49
116973 2/4/2010 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS PACNWFLOAT11980 NOOKSACK BIRDING ADVENTURE
NOOKSACK RIVER GUIDED BIRDING ADVENTURE
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 127.12
Total :127.12
116974 2/4/2010 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 011347105 COPIER CONTRACT
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 13.45
Total :158.67
116975 2/4/2010 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.906175 PAINT FOR YOST DOOR
PAINT FOR YOST POOL LOWER DOOR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.64
Total :18.90
116976 2/4/2010 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK11785 PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 418.60
Total :418.60
116977 2/4/2010 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 79069 INV#79069 EDMONDS PD
TSR X26 EXTENDED DPM TASERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3,139.80
TSR X26E STANDARD DPM TASERS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5,459.65
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 42.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 821.03
30Page:
Packet Page 49 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :9,463.43116977 2/4/2010 071594 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT
116978 2/4/2010 073056 PROSPECT CONSTRUCTION INC 2 C-311 THRU 1/18/2010
C311 ODOR CONTROL PROJECT
414.000.656.594.320.650.10 74,225.13
Total :74,225.13
116979 2/4/2010 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 37.85
Total :37.85
116980 2/4/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 516.73
Total :516.73
116981 2/4/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
411.000.656.538.800.472.63 1,335.39
Total :1,335.39
116982 2/4/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 422.16
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 324.88
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 556.33
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 36.99
31Page:
Packet Page 50 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116982 2/4/2010 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 140.54
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 140.54
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 140.54
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 140.54
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 140.55
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg3689976003
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 569.13
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 343.74
Fire Station # 165322323139
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 793.35
SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009
SEWER LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 35.31
FLEET5903085008
Fleet 7110 210th St SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 402.99
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 939.37
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,755.11
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
FIRE STATION #209919661109
32Page:
Packet Page 51 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116982 2/4/2010 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 423.71
Total :8,394.53
116983 2/4/2010 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 7408 PUBLIC DEFENDER
PUBLIC DEFENDER
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 800.00
Total :800.00
116984 2/4/2010 073066 SAFARILAND LLC I10-003250 INV#I10-003250 - EDMONDS PD
3x5 WHITE BACKING CARDS
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 82.70
5.5x8.5 WHITE BACKING CARDS
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 65.32
4" FROSTED LIFTING TAPE
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 119.60
ZEPHYR DUSTING BRUSH
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 46.55
Freight
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 22.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.310.00 29.85
Total :367.01
116985 2/4/2010 072802 SCIENCE EXPRESS LLC SCIENCE11967 PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CLUB
PRESCHOOL SCIENCE CLUB #11967
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 117.60
Total :117.60
116986 2/4/2010 069197 SKYLINE ELECTRIC & MFG CO 61936 SEAVIEW RESTROOM ELECTRICAL
SERVICE CABINET FOR SEAVIEW RESTROOM
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 2,260.00
Freight
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 81.00
9.5% Sales Tax
33Page:
Packet Page 52 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116986 2/4/2010 (Continued)069197 SKYLINE ELECTRIC & MFG CO
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 222.40
Total :2,563.40
116987 2/4/2010 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT 2449 UNIFORM/SLENKLER
UNIFORM/SLENKLER
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 280.79
Total :280.79
116988 2/4/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3850013073 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 32.05
UTILITY BILLING3890014081
UTILITY BILLING FOR CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 408.47
UTILITY BILLING4120014156
UTILITY BILLING FOR CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 16.96
SPRINKLER SYSTEM4160017333
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 148.30
UTILITY BILLING5040011628
UTILITY BILLING FOR CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 139.96
Total :745.74
116989 2/4/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 282051992 958-001-000-8
WWTP ELECTRICITY
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 31,983.46
Total :31,983.46
116990 2/4/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2260043795 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 56.04
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE2440024129
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 199.00
34Page:
Packet Page 53 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116990 2/4/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER2670022181
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,392.54
SIGNAL LIGHT3710011507
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 60.24
SIGNAL LIGHT3800017489
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 56.63
LIFT STATION #123850011440
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 326.95
School Crosswalk lite4010359802
School Crosswalk lite
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 55.12
LIFT STATION #154070022027
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 32.56
STREET LIGHT4320012174
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 805.31
LOG CABIN5500019350
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 566.97
Total :5,551.36
116991 2/4/2010 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 684 firemednet services
firemednet services
001.000.510.522.200.410.00 125.77
firemednet services688
firemednet services
001.000.510.522.200.410.00 215.60
Total :341.37
116992 2/4/2010 037075 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE 2009 Voter Reg 2009 Voter Registration File Maint
35Page:
Packet Page 54 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116992 2/4/2010 (Continued)037075 SNOHOMISH CO AUDITOR'S OFFICE
2009 Voter Registration File Maint
001.000.390.511.800.510.00 66,359.28
Total :66,359.28
116993 2/4/2010 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Jan 2010 crime victims
crime victims
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 892.00
Total :892.00
116994 2/4/2010 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4162205-01 0366
UNIFORM/NORDQUIST
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 304.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 28.91
Total :333.25
116995 2/4/2010 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2372755-01 Storm - Jacket - M Johnson
Storm - Jacket - M Johnson
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 95.45
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 8.78
Storm- Work Jeans (5), Jacket4162433-01
Storm- Work Jeans (5), Jacket
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 253.70
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 24.10
Storm - Work Jeans (4), Jacket - J Ward4162435-01
Storm - Work Jeans (4), Jacket - J Ward
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 191.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 18.17
Street - Work Jacket - C Hiatt4162439-01
Street - Work Jacket - C Hiatt
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 95.45
9.5% Sales Tax
36Page:
Packet Page 55 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116995 2/4/2010 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 9.07
Storm - Work Jeans (5), Jacket -K Harris4162463-01
Storm - Work Jeans (5), Jacket -K Harris
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 259.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 24.68
Total :980.45
116996 2/4/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2104890 SEAVIEW RESTROOM PROJECT
SUPPLIES FOR SEAVIEW RESTROOM PROJECT
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 315.02
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.93
Total :344.95
116997 2/4/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10912131 SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS
SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS, WIRE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 55.91
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.31
Total :61.22
116998 2/4/2010 073083 THE REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC 2-20575 RE: 1010 DALEY ST EDMONDS WA
RE: 1010 Daley St Edmonds
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 133.08
Total :133.08
116999 2/4/2010 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 399776 MUSEUM
monthly elevator maint-museum
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 188.02
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 17.86
FAC399777
monthly elevator maint-FAC~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 829.53
37Page:
Packet Page 56 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
116999 2/4/2010 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 78.81
MONTHLY ELEVATOR MONIT-LIBRARY399778
Monthly elevator maint-Library~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 822.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 78.10
MAINTENANCE-PS399779
maintenance-PS 2/1-4/30/10
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 711.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 67.55
MONITORING-PS399780
monitoring-PS~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 41.90
LIBRARY MONITORING399781
LIBRARY MONITORING 2/1-4/30/10
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 64.14
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE407821
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 154.98
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.71
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING407822
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 12.61
Total :3,081.49
117000 2/4/2010 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 40908 YOST POOL FENCE REPAIR
YOST POOL FENCE REPAIR
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 984.00
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 93.48
Total :1,077.48
38Page:
Packet Page 57 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117001 2/4/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8401382 Water Inventory - W-VALVCI-02-010
Water Inventory - W-VALVCI-02-010
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 876.28
Water Supplies - Valve Boxes, Lids,
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1,726.09
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 83.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 163.97
Water Supplies8403671
Water Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 94.30
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.96
Total :2,952.85
117002 2/4/2010 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 965694 Water - 2 1/2" Liquid Filled Gauge
Water - 2 1/2" Liquid Filled Gauge
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 158.97
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 16.48
Water - High Security and Utility Locks972698
Water - High Security and Utility Locks
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 117.24
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.95
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.65
Total :335.79
117003 2/4/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-1176 CITY PARK T1 LINE
City Park T1 Line 1/16-2/15/10
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 409.72
39Page:
Packet Page 58 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :409.72117003 2/4/2010 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
117004 2/4/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.47
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 270.16
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.53
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.41
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.32
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.58
LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 49.76
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 56.66
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 226.61
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.74
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.80
Total :1,002.54
40Page:
Packet Page 59 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117005 2/4/2010 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 08369349688 C/A 571242650-0001
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Bld Dept
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 99.83
Blackberry Cell Phone Service City
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Court
001.000.230.512.500.420.00 115.10
Blackberry Cell Phone Service
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Planning
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Econ
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 217.84
Blackberry Cell Phone Service
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 118.63
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Finance
001.000.310.514.230.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service FD Admin;
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service FD Admin;
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 57.70
Blackberry Cell Phone Service FD Admin;
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 353.30
Blackberry Cell Phone Service FD Air
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 86.02
Blackberry Cell Phone Service HR thru
001.000.220.516.100.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service IT thru
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 336.10
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Mayor's
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 172.10
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Parks
001.000.640.574.100.420.00 57.12
41Page:
Packet Page 60 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117005 2/4/2010 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Police
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,152.87
Blackberry Air Cards Police Dept thru
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 301.09
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Admin
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW St
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 60.32
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Fleet
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 56.82
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Water/
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 37.14
Blackberry Cell Phone Service PW Water/
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 37.13
Blackberry Cell Phone Service WWTP thru
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 119.21
Blackberry Cell Phone Service Sewer
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 77.77
Total :3,910.65
117006 2/4/2010 072312 VERSATILE MOBILE SYSTEMS INC 0000045214 INV#0000045214 CUST#EDMCIT - EDMONDS PD
HONEYWELL 4600G SCANNER KITS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3,107.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 296.01
Total :3,411.91
117007 2/4/2010 045517 WACA 2010 WACA MEMBERSHIP 2010 - EDMONDS PD - DAWSON, SHOEMAKE
MEMBERSHIP - TABATHA SHOEMAKE
001.000.410.521.700.490.00 35.00
MEMBERSHIP - DEBBIE DAWSON
001.000.410.521.700.490.00 35.00
42Page:
Packet Page 61 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :70.00117007 2/4/2010 045517 045517 WACA
117008 2/4/2010 065285 WAPELRA 1/29/10 Membership dues (2010) - Debi Humann
Membership dues (2010) - Debi Humann
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 200.00
Total :200.00
117009 2/4/2010 061733 WARREN, DEAN 8/13/09 Tuition Reimbursement - 8/28/09 -
Tuition Reimbursement - 8/28/09 -
001.000.220.516.100.490.00 585.00
Total :585.00
117010 2/4/2010 061395 WASTE MANAGEMENT NW 5997433-2677-0 201-01707-2677-6
ASH DISPOSAL
411.000.656.538.800.474.65 4,681.34
Total :4,681.34
117011 2/4/2010 073084 WILSON, GUINNIVERE WILSON01192010 REFUND
REFUND DUE TO CUSTOMER REQUEST
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 158.00
Total :158.00
117012 2/4/2010 067465 WOOD, JULIA WOOD11954 GYROKINESIS
GYROKINESIS #11954
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 65.00
Total :65.00
117013 2/4/2010 065179 WSAPT TREAS / MICHELLE MILLER Harrison Dues 2010 WSAPT 2010 Dues - Harrison
WSAPT 2010 Dues - Harrison
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 35.00
WSAPT Dues 2010 ThornquistThornquist Dues 2010
WSAPT Dues 2010 Thornquist
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 35.00
Total :70.00
Bank total :543,160.45148 Vouchers for bank code :front
43Page:
Packet Page 62 of 179
02/04/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
3:26:27PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
543,160.45Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report148
44Page:
Packet Page 63 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117014 2/11/2010 041695 3M XAM3522 SS08169 Traffic Control - VIP Diamond Grade
Traffic Control - VIP Diamond Grade
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1,706.25
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 162.10
Total : 1,868.35
117015 2/11/2010 073092 AARP refund 6/13/09 refund for ems transport
refund for ems transport
001.000.000.342.601.000.00 75.04
Total : 75.04
117016 2/11/2010 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 45989 Water 5 Corners Pump Station - Smoke
Water 5 Corners Pump Station - Smoke
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.75
Total : 54.75
117017 2/11/2010 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101293275 M5Z34
CAL GAS
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.38
M5Z34101300421
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 58.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.53
Total : 91.11
117018 2/11/2010 069803 AIRVAC 12056 FS 20 - Air Vac - 911 4-Stage Filter
FS 20 - Air Vac - 911 4-Stage Filter
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1,420.00
Freight
1Page:
Packet Page 64 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117018 2/11/2010 (Continued)069803 AIRVAC
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 160.00
Total : 1,580.00
117019 2/11/2010 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001183694 FIRE STATION #20
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 122.00
Public Works Facility0197-001183782
Public Works Facility
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 24.71
Public Works Facility
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 93.90
Public Works Facility
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 93.90
Public Works Facility
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 93.90
Public Works Facility
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 93.90
Public Works Facility
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 93.90
garbage for F/S #160197-001183852
garbage for F/S #16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 127.33
garbage for MCC0197-00184511
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 58.40
Total : 801.94
117020 2/11/2010 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC QE37 EDMONDS
PRIORITY POLLUTANT TESTING
411.000.656.538.800.410.21 280.00
Total : 280.00
117021 2/11/2010 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON0206 GYM MONITOR
ANDERSON CENTER GYM MONITOR FOR
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 36.00
2Page:
Packet Page 65 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 36.00 117021 2/11/2010 066025 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE
117022 2/11/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4739976 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 29.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.84
Total : 32.71
117023 2/11/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4727929 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 60.69
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 5.77
Total : 66.46
117024 2/11/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4720201 Street/Storm Uniform Svc
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.37
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.36
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.23
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.22
Total : 5.18
117025 2/11/2010 071968 ARTS ED WASHINGTON EAC2010 RENEWAL
RENEWAL - EDMONDS ARTS COMMISSION
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 50.00
Total : 50.00
117026 2/11/2010 071120 ASHLAND INC 93102879 441142
POLYMER
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 4,250.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.51 403.75
3Page:
Packet Page 66 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 4,653.75 117026 2/11/2010 071120 071120 ASHLAND INC
117027 2/11/2010 069451 ASTRA INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 00109588 Water Quality - Backflow Test Equip
Water Quality - Backflow Test Equip
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 13.80
Water Quality - DC W/Ball Valves00109609
Water Quality - DC W/Ball Valves
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 235.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 121.78
Water Quality - Test Kit00109610
Water Quality - Test Kit
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 740.00
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.43
Total : 1,124.01
117028 2/11/2010 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM
PARKS FAX MODEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 41.88
Total : 41.88
117029 2/11/2010 065712 ATLAS SUPPLY SI+0175221 SIKAFLEX
SIKAFLEX, BLACK, LIMESTONE AND BRONZE
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 87.60
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.50
Total : 109.46
117030 2/11/2010 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 12114 BURIAL SUPPLIES
BURIAL SUPPLIES: THOMSON
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 388.00
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 36.86
4Page:
Packet Page 67 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 424.86 117030 2/11/2010 001801 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO
117031 2/11/2010 001527 AWWA 7000189629 Membership Renewal 2010 - K Kuhnhausen
Membership Renewal 2010 - K Kuhnhausen
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 78.00
Total : 78.00
117032 2/11/2010 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0110 Background check services
Background check services
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 65.00
Total : 65.00
117033 2/11/2010 073075 BAILEY DUSKIN PEIFFLE &8366-001 99936 Legal Services Fiber Project thru
Legal Services Fiber Project thru
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 737.36
Total : 737.36
117034 2/11/2010 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2008-901 INV #2008-901 EDMONDS PD
PRE-EMPLOY SCREENING 2/5/10
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 150.00
Total : 150.00
117035 2/11/2010 002170 BARTON, RONALD 21 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,739.00
Total : 1,739.00
117036 2/11/2010 073041 BECK & ASSOCIATES PLLC 2010-EDM-01 Plan Review - Holy Rosary Parish
Plan Review - Holy Rosary Parish
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 4,150.68
Total : 4,150.68
117037 2/11/2010 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0002999 E8GA.Services thru 01/22/10
E8GA.Services thru 01/22/10
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 2,612.22
Total : 2,612.22
5Page:
Packet Page 68 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117038 2/11/2010 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 424595 Fleet Brake Supply Inventory
Fleet Brake Supply Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 769.79
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 73.13
Total : 842.92
117039 2/11/2010 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 786328-80 REFUND SHIRTS - EDMONDS PD - COMPTON
MOCK TURTLENECK SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -39.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 -3.79
INV#786328-82 EDMONDS PD - COMPTON786328-82
MOCK TURTLENECK SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.79
INV#786340 - EDMONDS PD - GREENMUN786340
FLASHLIGHT RING HOLDER
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 0.95
INV#787833 - EDMONDS PD - MCINTYRE787833
GORE-TEX HI-TOP BOOT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 132.64
TIE BAR W/SEAL & LETTERS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 16.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 14.21
INV#792493 - EDMONDS PD - SHIER792493
DANNER ACADIA BOOTS #21210
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 207.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.76
INV#792503 - EDMONDS PD - MACHADO792503
DANNER BLACKHAWK II BOOTS
6Page:
Packet Page 69 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117039 2/11/2010 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 200.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 19.02
INV#793413 - EDMONDS PD - ROBINSON, J793413
S/S UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 196.98
L/S UNIFORM SHIRTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 269.61
UNIFORM NAVY PANTS
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 325.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 75.25
Total : 1,488.94
117040 2/11/2010 060141 BRANOM INSTRUMENT 422763 3083
USB FOR RADIO
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 117.00
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 5.91
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 11.68
Total : 134.59
117041 2/11/2010 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BROCKMANN11751 YOGA CLASSES
YOGA #11751
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 933.80
YOGA #11756
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 755.16
YOGA #12445
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 117.60
YOGA #12442
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 75.60
PILATES STRETCH & SCULPT #12447
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 38.50
YOGA #12443
7Page:
Packet Page 70 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117041 2/11/2010 (Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 67.20
Total : 1,987.86
117042 2/11/2010 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN CAMPBELL11737 OIL PAINTING
OIL PAINTING #17737
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 277.20
OIL PAINTING #11738
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 246.40
Total : 523.60
117043 2/11/2010 070892 CASCADE BANK E6DA.Pmt 6 Retainage Precision Earthworks Ret 6
Precision Earthworks Ret 6
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 9,422.27
Total : 9,422.27
117044 2/11/2010 068484 CEMEX 9418630954 Storm Dump Fees
Storm Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 107.93
Roadway - Asphalt9418636433
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 351.56
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 33.40
ROADWAY ASPHALT9418636434
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 281.56
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 26.75
Storm Dump Fees9418636435
Storm Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 479.02
Roadway - Asphalt9418651406
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 246.56
9.5% Sales Tax
8Page:
Packet Page 71 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117044 2/11/2010 (Continued)068484 CEMEX
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 23.43
Roadway - Asphalt9418659725
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 281.56
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 26.75
Total : 1,858.52
117045 2/11/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN01101013 HELIUM
HELIUM RENTAL FOR GYMNASTICS BALLOONS
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 8.30
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.79
Total : 9.09
117046 2/11/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN1101014 2954000
CYLINDER RENTAL
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 33.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.15
Total : 36.35
117047 2/11/2010 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 16165250 COPIER LEASE PW
copier lease for PW Feb 10
001.000.650.519.910.450.00 607.12
Total : 607.12
117048 2/11/2010 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E3JC.ROW Permit E3JC.PUD Pole Installation
E3JC.PUD Pole Installation
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 320.00
Total : 320.00
117049 2/11/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7691 INV#7691 CUST#45 EDMONDS PD
NEXTEL PHONES - NARCS 01/10
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.43
9Page:
Packet Page 72 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 56.43 117049 2/11/2010 019215 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
117050 2/11/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7687 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 13,800.83
Total : 13,800.83
117051 2/11/2010 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF Jan 10
WATER USEAGE FOR THE MONTH OF Jan 10
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 435.00
Total : 435.00
117052 2/11/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2150667-1 Fac Maint - Mashal Classic 25 gal
Fac Maint - Mashal Classic 25 gal
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 118.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 11.24
Total : 129.56
117053 2/11/2010 065891 CONLEY, LISA CONLEY012710 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUB
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL SUB
001.000.640.575.560.410.00 120.00
Total : 120.00
117054 2/11/2010 065364 CONTRACT HARDWARE INC SPI-003616 PS - Locks
PS - Locks
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 352.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.350.00 33.44
Total : 385.44
117055 2/11/2010 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 510-0991 C/A 600049 THRU 12/31/09
OPS Uniform drycleaning. Station 16
001.000.510.522.200.240.00 31.48
C/A 6000054 THRU 12/31/09510-1524
OPS Uniform drycleaning. M Smith
001.000.510.522.300.240.00 8.22
10Page:
Packet Page 73 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 39.70 117055 2/11/2010 065683 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING
117056 2/11/2010 065752 DAPHNE R SCHNEIDER & ASSOC 3 Team Development Training Sessions
Team Development Training Sessions
001.000.620.532.200.410.00 2,700.00
Total : 2,700.00
117057 2/11/2010 072189 DATASITE 64594 SHREDDING SERVICES/CABINETS
Doc Shred Services City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 20.00
Doc Shred Services Finance
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 20.00
Total : 40.00
117058 2/11/2010 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2010010118 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for January, 2010
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 254.46
Total : 254.46
117059 2/11/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3071 INV#10-3071 EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #IA09-002
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 30.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-4903
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 48.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-5008
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 111.00
TRANSCRIPTION CASE #10-0145
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 72.00
Total : 261.00
117060 2/11/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3073 MINUTE TAKING
02/02 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 231.00
Total : 231.00
117061 2/11/2010 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2010002 Michel Fire Suppression .
Michel Fire Suppression .
11Page:
Packet Page 74 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117061 2/11/2010 (Continued)069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
001.000.620.524.100.410.00 680.00
Total : 680.00
117062 2/11/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001026/1 NOZZLE
NOZZLES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.98
BONDO001027/1
RESIN FIBERGLASS BONDO
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 15.99
EXTENSION BIT001028/1
EXTENSION BIT
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.49
PULL UTILITY001029/1
PULL UTILITY/CEMETERY
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 8.98
Total : 47.44
117063 2/11/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001025/1 City Hall - Fasteners
City Hall - Fasteners
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.25
Total : 4.25
117064 2/11/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 18339 FUEL FILTERS
FUEL FILTERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.59
PLIERS18381
PLIERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.04
Total : 30.38
117065 2/11/2010 047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT ES # 945133-10 7 UBI 312 000 093 000
Q4-09 Unemployment Insurance
12Page:
Packet Page 75 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117065 2/11/2010 (Continued)047407 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT
001.000.390.517.780.230.00 14,678.40
Total : 14,678.40
117066 2/11/2010 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES ENGLAND11999 SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE CLASSES
DANCE CLASS #11999
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 192.00
DANCE CLASS #12000
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 256.00
DANCE CLASS #12001
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 480.00
Total : 928.00
117067 2/11/2010 008975 ENTENMANN ROVIN CO 0059216-IN INV#0059216-IN, ACCT#0011847 EDMONDS PD
DETECTIVE CORP FLAT BADGE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 81.00
OFFICER OF THE YEAR 2009
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 76.00
EMPLOYEE OF THE YEAR 2009
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 76.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.36
Total : 244.36
117068 2/11/2010 065789 ESTES, KEN 18 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,224.80
Total : 1,224.80
117069 2/11/2010 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0242055 Water Inventory - w-pipeco-02-020
Water Inventory - w-pipeco-02-020
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 573.79
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.341.00 54.51
Total : 628.30
117070 2/11/2010 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 151075 Annual plan fee (FSA 125 & 132 plan) +
13Page:
Packet Page 76 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117070 2/11/2010 (Continued)070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC
Annual plan fee (FSA 125 & 132 plan) +
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 701.20
Total : 701.20
117071 2/11/2010 070777 FROLAND, MARK J FROLAND 01/10 MILEAGE FOR BELLINGHAM TRAINING 1/25-29
MILEAGE-HOSTAGE NEG. TRAINING -
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 305.90
Total : 305.90
117072 2/11/2010 070498 FULMER, JAMES & CORAL 7-01600 7-0912-078 UTILITY REFUND
RE: #7-0912-078 Utility Refund
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 35.18
Total : 35.18
117073 2/11/2010 061589 GALLS INC 510350192 Fleet Small Tools - Mag Charger and Bulb
Fleet Small Tools - Mag Charger and Bulb
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 42.96
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 8.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 4.94
Total : 56.89
117074 2/11/2010 069222 GILBERT, DANIEL 2010 Boots Water - Boot Allowance 2010 - D Gilbert
Water - Boot Allowance 2010 - D Gilbert
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 183.00
Total : 183.00
117075 2/11/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9161144556 Water - Dayton St - Motor Replacement
Water - Dayton St - Motor Replacement
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 88.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 8.40
Total : 96.74
117076 2/11/2010 068302 HALFON CANDY COMPANY 304741 EGG HUNT CANDY
14Page:
Packet Page 77 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117076 2/11/2010 (Continued)068302 HALFON CANDY COMPANY
CANDY FOR EASTER EGG HUNT
001.000.640.574.200.310.00 243.00
Total : 243.00
117077 2/11/2010 013007 HASNER, EZRA J 22 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 645.16
Total : 645.16
117078 2/11/2010 065764 HASNER, THOMAS W 20 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,800.79
Total : 1,800.79
117079 2/11/2010 062383 HEPBURN INDUSTRIES IN090168 BURIAL SUPPLIES
CREMAINS VAULT
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 297.80
Freight
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 41.55
Total : 339.35
117080 2/11/2010 069164 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 47084341 Desktops & cable kits
Desktops & cable kits
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 566.00
Desktops & cable kits
001.000.230.512.500.350.00 566.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 53.77
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.350.00 53.77
PO 310-00132 STIMULUS FUNDED47089718
USB keyboard
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 25.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 2.38
15Page:
Packet Page 78 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117080 2/11/2010 (Continued)069164 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
PO 310-00132 STIMULUS FUNDED47104557
C 3000 enclosure rack - single phase;
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 21,306.00
HP car Pack 5 yr support bl4XXC-
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 1,256.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 2,024.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 119.32
Total : 25,972.31
117081 2/11/2010 073091 HIATT, HEIDI HIATT11958 PINK PRINCESS PARTY
PINK PRINCESS PARTY #11958
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 117.60
Total : 117.60
117082 2/11/2010 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 15 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 7.52
LEOFF 1 reimbursement17
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 15.00
Total : 22.52
117083 2/11/2010 067369 HUMANN, JENNIFER 2/8/10 Door monitor - Citizen's Commission (2
Door monitor - Citizen's Commission (2
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 24.00
Total : 24.00
117084 2/11/2010 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 20846 E4GA.Services thru 01/30/10
E4GA.Services thru 01/30/10
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 150.00
Total : 150.00
117085 2/11/2010 072345 IDABO INC 2832 Building Official, #10-01 ad
Building Official, #10-01 ad
16Page:
Packet Page 79 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117085 2/11/2010 (Continued)072345 IDABO INC
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 25.00
Total : 25.00
117086 2/11/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 81340873 COPIER LEASING
Cannon Image Runner
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 930.93
Total : 930.93
117087 2/11/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5013479227 Large copier charges from
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 3.21
Large copier charges from
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 33.80
Eng. color & black & white copier5013479228
Eng. color & black & white copier
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 185.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 17.58
Total : 239.66
117088 2/11/2010 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2886546 PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL INTERNET ACCESS
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00
Total : 15.00
117089 2/11/2010 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 82913 YOST POOL SUPPLIES
ASSEMBLY, IMPELLER, SEAL KIT, COUPLER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 400.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 38.06
Total : 438.71
117090 2/11/2010 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN LAMPHERE12020 TAMING YOUR SUGAR BEAST
TAMING YOUR SUGAR BEAST#12020
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 260.00
17Page:
Packet Page 80 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 260.00 117090 2/11/2010 069083 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN
117091 2/11/2010 017135 LANDAU ASSOCIATES INC 26286 E5MC.Hickman Fence Geotech Report
E5MC.Hickman Fence Geotech Report
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 60.00
Total : 60.00
117092 2/11/2010 069564 LARSON, KEN 14 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,333.80
Total : 1,333.80
117093 2/11/2010 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 2010-107 REACHER
EZ REACHER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 119.94
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.45
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.01
STARTER CORD2010-225
STARTER CORD
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 42.90
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.66
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.71
Total : 192.67
117094 2/11/2010 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 2010-239 ASH RAKE
ASH RAKE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 51.99
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.94
Total : 56.93
117095 2/11/2010 069634 LEXISNEXIS 1201641-20100131 INV# 1201641-20100131 EDMONDS PD
SEARCHES/REPORTS - JAN 2010
18Page:
Packet Page 81 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117095 2/11/2010 (Continued)069634 LEXISNEXIS
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 66.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 6.36
Total : 73.31
117096 2/11/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 103301 SISTER CITY LETTERHEAD
SISTER CITY LETTERHEAD
623.200.210.557.210.490.00 202.79
9.5% Sales Tax
623.200.210.557.210.490.00 19.27
Total : 222.06
117097 2/11/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 103485 BUSINESS CARDS FOR COUNCIL & PD
Business cards~250-00236
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 16.87
Diane Buchshnis250-00236
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 16.87
D.J. Smith250-00236
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 16.87
Douglas F. Compton250-00236
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 16.87
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 3.21
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 1.60
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 1.60
Total : 73.89
117098 2/11/2010 019583 MANPOWER INC 19798890 Vacation coverage Tues thru Fri, Jan.
Vacation coverage Tues thru Fri, Jan.
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 318.83
Total : 318.83
117099 2/11/2010 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 19 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
19Page:
Packet Page 82 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117099 2/11/2010 (Continued)019920 MCCANN, MARIAN
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.290.00 5,535.00
Total : 5,535.00
117100 2/11/2010 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 45953444 123106800
FIRST AID SUPPLIES/O-RINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 81.53
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.53
12310680046306750
HYDRAULIC HOSE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 17.72
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.54
12310680046344139
O-RING/CHOSE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 80.53
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.29
Total : 200.14
117101 2/11/2010 073093 MEDICARE REFUNDS-WA refund 6/13/09 refund for ems transport
refund for ems transport
001.000.000.342.601.000.00 300.18
Total : 300.18
117102 2/11/2010 063773 MICROFLEX 00019086 DEC-09 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
Dec-09 Tax Audit Program
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 275.62
Total : 275.62
117103 2/11/2010 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 101535 TRACKHOE RENTAL
RENTAL OF TRACKHOE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 346.16
Total : 346.16
20Page:
Packet Page 83 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117104 2/11/2010 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 101808 17967
PROPANE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 49.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 4.69
Total : 54.09
117105 2/11/2010 020905 MILLIMAN INC 003FPL099 Actuarial Valuation as of 1/1/2009
Actuarial Valuation as of 1/1/2009
617.000.510.522.200.410.00 3,605.25
Actuarial Valuation as of 1/1/2009
009.000.390.517.370.410.00 15,369.75
Total : 18,975.00
117106 2/11/2010 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 09-1030-9 E8JB.Services thru 12/31/09
E8JB.Services thru 12/31/09
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 5,274.85
Total : 5,274.85
117107 2/11/2010 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB12063 FUN FACTORY
FUN FACTORY #12063
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 301.35
POWER PLAY #12171
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 28.00
Total : 329.35
117108 2/11/2010 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S3209666.001 2091
ELECTRICAL PANEL
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 64.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.22 6.08
Total : 70.08
117109 2/11/2010 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 33189 Unit 3 - Hose
Unit 3 - Hose
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 22.95
9.2% Sales Tax
21Page:
Packet Page 84 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117109 2/11/2010 (Continued)025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.11
Total : 25.06
117110 2/11/2010 071192 NORTH STAR ELECTIC 10918 Unit 491 - Keyed Latch
Unit 491 - Keyed Latch
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.33
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.54
Total : 52.37
117111 2/11/2010 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 8639 260
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 2,213.30
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 210.26
Total : 2,423.56
117112 2/11/2010 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-074837 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
MADRONA ELEMENTARY
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 930.75
HONEY BUCKET CREDIT1-075984
CREDIT FOR MADRONA HONEY BUCKET
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 -102.44
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-077754
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL:CIVIC FIELD
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 189.87
Total : 1,018.18
117113 2/11/2010 066787 NORTHWEST COMPUTER SUPPORT CINV21418 Message Archiver and support
Message Archiver and support
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 5,701.72
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.350.00 541.66
22Page:
Packet Page 85 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 6,243.38 117113 2/11/2010 066787 066787 NORTHWEST COMPUTER SUPPORT
117114 2/11/2010 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 106 Planning Board Minutes on 1/27/10.
Planning Board Minutes on 1/27/10.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 160.00
Total : 160.00
117115 2/11/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 305752 INV#305752 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
HP LASERJET CART C4096A
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 101.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.710.310.00 9.63
INV#305947 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD305947
BLACK KEY TAGS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 55.79
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 5.30
Total : 172.13
117116 2/11/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 024053 BATTERIES/FILE POCKETS
FILE POCKETS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 29.71
ARTS COMMISSION - BATTERIES
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 9.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 2.83
9.5% Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 0.93
OFFICE SUPPLIES034224
PARK MAINTENANCE PLANNERS, LAMINATING
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 72.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.87
CEMETERY OFFICE SUPPLIES040805
PRINT CARTRIDGES
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 29.89
23Page:
Packet Page 86 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117116 2/11/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
9.5% Sales Tax
130.000.640.536.500.310.00 2.84
CATALOGS159302
2010 CATALOGS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 0.02
STAPLE REMOVER, LEADS227449
PENCIL LEADS, STAPLE REMOVER
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 1.61
9.5% Sales Tax
117.100.640.573.100.310.00 0.14
OFFICE SUPPLIES232260
TONER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 101.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 9.63
OFFICE SUPPLIES244093
DIVIDERS
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 13.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.27
OFFICE SUPPLIES286413
67# PAPER
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 20.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.100.310.00 1.93
Total : 304.80
117117 2/11/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 305306 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 164.23
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 15.60
Total : 179.83
117118 2/11/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 189806 Misc. office supplies including label
24Page:
Packet Page 87 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117118 2/11/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
Misc. office supplies including label
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 246.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 23.40
Hanging frames. Didn't fit old desk190638
Hanging frames. Didn't fit old desk
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -19.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -1.84
File jackets. Ordered incorrect product.619601
File jackets. Ordered incorrect product.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -112.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -10.68
At a glance padfolio. Wrong size.884537
At a glance padfolio. Wrong size.
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -18.46
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -1.76
Total : 105.11
117119 2/11/2010 072720 OFFIS COMMUNICAATIONS 14199 Add'l items for Video Arraignment System
Add'l items for Video Arraignment System
001.000.230.512.500.350.10 380.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.230.512.500.350.10 36.11
Total : 416.11
117120 2/11/2010 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 WATER
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 12.93
WATER/SEWER0060860
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 68.39
25Page:
Packet Page 88 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 81.32 117120 2/11/2010 026200 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
117121 2/11/2010 068316 PACE ENGINEERS INC 46416 E9CA.Services thru 12/31/09
E9CA.Services thru 12/31/09
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 16,240.50
Total : 16,240.50
117122 2/11/2010 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 01B074 B/W copy overage fee (1447)
B/W copy overage fee (1447)
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 6.57
B/W copy overage fee (1447)
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 6.57
B/W copy overage fee (1447)
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 6.57
B/W copy overage fee (1447)
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 6.55
Color copy overage fee (873)
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 23.50
Color copy overage fee (873)
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 23.50
Color copy overage fee (873)
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 23.50
Color copy overage fee (873)
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 23.51
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 2.86
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 2.86
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 2.86
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 2.85
Total : 131.70
117123 2/11/2010 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 94176 INV#94176 EDMONDS PD - #10-0420
TOWING HONDA ACCORD 701YMC
26Page:
Packet Page 89 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117123 2/11/2010 (Continued)070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total : 173.01
117124 2/11/2010 070979 PRECISION EARTHWORKS INC E6DA.Pmt 6 E6DA.Work completed thru 01/31/10
E6DA.Work completed thru 01/31/10
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 188,222.17
Total : 188,222.17
117125 2/11/2010 064291 QWEST 206-Z02-0478 332B TELEMETRY
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 138.52
Total : 138.52
117126 2/11/2010 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 67892 INV#67892 EDMONDS PD #10-0433
TOWING TOYOTA CAMRY 471YQZ
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total : 173.01
117127 2/11/2010 072860 REGENCE BLUE SHIELD Refund-6/1/09 refund for EMS transport-double
refund for EMS transport-double
001.000.000.342.601.000.00 644.00
Total : 644.00
117128 2/11/2010 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 001541 Storm Dump Fees
Storm Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1,061.85
Total : 1,061.85
117129 2/11/2010 067447 RILEY, CHARLES H.16 LEOFF 1 reimbursement
LEOFF 1 reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 1,779.05
27Page:
Packet Page 90 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 1,779.05 117129 2/11/2010 067447 067447 RILEY, CHARLES H.
117130 2/11/2010 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 1/31/10 ACCT#70014, ANIMAL CONTROL-EDMONDS PD
#624681 5 NPC 01/11/10
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 53.40
#624502 4 NPC 01/25/10
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 42.72
Total : 96.12
117131 2/11/2010 072521 SAVAGE, JENNIFER SAVAGE12037 CARDIO KICKBOXING
CARDIO KICKBOXING #12037
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 143.50
Total : 143.50
117132 2/11/2010 068816 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 65266475 458-01617507
TEST & INSPECTION SRINKLER SYSTEM
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 302.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.480.21 8.08
Total : 310.08
117133 2/11/2010 036955 SKY NURSERY 281018 Water Dept - Planting Mix
Water Dept - Planting Mix
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 129.85
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.34
Total : 142.19
117134 2/11/2010 037801 SNO CO HUMAN SERVICE DEPT I000243437 04-2009 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS & TAXES
Q4-2009 Liquor Board Profits & Taxes
001.000.390.567.000.510.00 2,186.50
Total : 2,186.50
117135 2/11/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2110016462 IRRIGATION CONTROL
IRRIGATION CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.51
UTILITY BILLING3570014369
28Page:
Packet Page 91 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117135 2/11/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
8030 185TH ST SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 24.75
IRRIGATION SYSTEM5070014260
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.51
Total : 83.77
117136 2/11/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 199028208 463-001-867-1
9805 EDMONDS WAY/WESTGATE
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 30.72
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 1.84
Total : 32.56
117137 2/11/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 3050047152 SIGNAL LIGHT
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 53.22
LIFT STATION #114130026596
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 34.52
TRAFFIC SIGNAL4510017488
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 29.51
Street Lighting (150 Watts = 1834610302228
Street Lighting (150 Watts = 183
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 1,421.87
STREET LIGHTING6000013000
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 13,800.95
STREET LIGHTING6100013009
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 2,571.03
STREET LIGHTING6100013306
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 184.24
29Page:
Packet Page 92 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117137 2/11/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
STREET LIGHTING6200013008
STREET LIGHTING
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 596.97
Total : 18,692.31
117138 2/11/2010 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE I000242869 INV#I000242869 CUST#SSH00095-EDMONDS PD
SCSO RANGE USAGE/10 HRS 11/19/09
001.000.410.521.400.410.00 500.00
SCSO RANGE USAGE/10 HRS 11/20/09
001.000.410.521.400.410.00 500.00
Total : 1,000.00
117139 2/11/2010 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000243598 SOLID WASTE CHARGES 55044
SOLID WASTE CHARGES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 358.00
Total : 358.00
117140 2/11/2010 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC Jan-2010 01/10 RECREATION SERVIES CONTRACT FEE
01/10 Recreation Servies Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 5,000.00
Total : 5,000.00
117141 2/11/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0110 DISPOSAL SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE DISPOSAL SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 569.64
Total : 569.64
117142 2/11/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING
RECYCLING
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 28.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.70
Total : 29.95
117143 2/11/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
30Page:
Packet Page 93 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117143 2/11/2010 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 550.74
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 520.28
Total : 2,300.72
117144 2/11/2010 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2372031-01 Sewer - Work Jeans (1) S Matthews
Sewer - Work Jeans (1) S Matthews
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 34.70
9.2% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 3.19
Street - Work Jacket, Jeans (5)2372920-01
Street - Work Jacket, Jeans (5)
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 265.50
9.2% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 24.43
Storm - Work Jeans (5) - D Leder2372937-0001-02
Storm - Work Jeans (5) - D Leder
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 180.15
9.2% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 16.57
Storm - Work Jacket - D Leder2372939-01
Storm - Work Jacket - D Leder
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 88.87
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 11.13
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) B Nilson2373599-01
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) B Nilson
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 188.85
31Page:
Packet Page 94 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117144 2/11/2010 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
9.2% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 17.37
Water - Work Jeans (5) D Gilbert4160781-01
Water - Work Jeans (5) D Gilbert
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 168.75
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 16.03
Water - Work Jeans (5) R Shore4162392-01
Water - Work Jeans (5) R Shore
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 165.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 15.68
sewer - Work Jeans (5) T Harris4162447-01
sewer - Work Jeans (5) T Harris
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 142.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 13.54
Storm - Work Jeans (1) - J Ward4162495-01
Storm - Work Jeans (1) - J Ward
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 28.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.71
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) J Clemmons4162513-01
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) J Clemmons
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 172.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 16.36
Sewer - Work Jeans (4) - S Matthews4162534-01
Sewer - Work Jeans (4) - S Matthews
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 138.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 13.19
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) D Crawford4162780-01
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) D Crawford
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 169.50
32Page:
Packet Page 95 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117144 2/11/2010 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 16.10
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) S Long4162891-01
Sewer - Work Jeans (5) S Long
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 169.05
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 16.06
Total : 2,094.78
117145 2/11/2010 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 101094 E6DA.Roberts - 01/15/10
E6DA.Roberts - 01/15/10
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 422.50
Total : 422.50
117146 2/11/2010 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2892416 Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 113.40
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 113.40
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 10.78
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 10.77
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint2892702
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 75.60
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 75.60
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 7.18
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 7.18
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint2893841
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 37.80
33Page:
Packet Page 96 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117146 2/11/2010 (Continued)009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC
Water/Sewer Fluor Upside Down Paint
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 37.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3.59
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.59
Total : 496.69
117147 2/11/2010 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3000792865 INV#3000792865 CUST#6076358 EDMONDS PD
MINIMUM MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.910.410.00 0.36
Total : 10.36
117148 2/11/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2106501 SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES FOR SEAVIEW PARK RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.06
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.00
Total : 23.06
117149 2/11/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2103638 FS 16 - Elect Supplies
FS 16 - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 54.32
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.16
Total : 59.48
117150 2/11/2010 072555 SYSTEMS DESIGN ED0110 Dec-09 Ambulance Billing Services
Dec-09 Ambulance Billing Services
001.000.510.526.100.410.00 5,177.92
Total : 5,177.92
117151 2/11/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 148134 Building Official ad, #10-01
Building Official ad, #10-01
34Page:
Packet Page 97 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117151 2/11/2010 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 199.00
Sewer MW I ad, #10-03
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 99.50
Total : 298.50
117152 2/11/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1680000 PLAZA ROOM AD
PLAZA ROOM AD IN WEDDING SECTION
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 426.20
Total : 426.20
117153 2/11/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 101415-1/31/2010 NEWSPAPER ADS
Council & Plan Brd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,455.89
NEWSPAPER AD168277
Ordinance 3779
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 32.20
NEWSPAPER AD1682773
Ordinance 3777
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.88
NEWSPAPER AD1682774
Ordinance 3780
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.88
NEWSPAPER AD1682776
Ordinance 3776
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 32.20
NEWSPAPER AD1682780
Ordinance 3778
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 32.20
Total : 1,620.25
117154 2/11/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1682021 Spasojevic/PLN2009-4. Notice of
Spasojevic/PLN2009-4. Notice of
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 25.48
Thomson/PLN2009-53 Notice of1682027
Thomson/PLN2009-53 Notice of
35Page:
Packet Page 98 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117154 2/11/2010 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 72.52
City/AMD-2010-6 Notice of Hearing1682413
City/AMD-2010-6 Notice of Hearing
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 45.64
Reidy/APL-2004-4 Notice of Appeal and1682590
Reidy/APL-2004-4 Notice of Appeal and
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 47.32
City/Sidewalk SEPA. Notice of SEPA1682818
City/Sidewalk SEPA. Notice of SEPA
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 57.40
City/Park naming. Notice of Development1683128
City/Park naming. Notice of Development
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 40.60
Total : 288.96
117155 2/11/2010 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES C/A 042483000 Building Official ad, #10-01
Building Official ad, #10-01
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 250.00
Sewer MW I ad, #10-03
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 250.00
Building Official ad, #10-01
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 132.00
Sewer MW I ad, #10-03
001.000.220.516.100.440.00 132.00
Total : 764.00
117156 2/11/2010 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC JAN2011-Edmonds Hearing Examiner services for January
Hearing Examiner services for January
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,600.00
Total : 3,600.00
117157 2/11/2010 069673 TRANSTECH ELECTRIC INC Retention Release 76th & 212th Pole Replacement Retention
76th & 212th Pole Replacement Retention
111.000.653.542.640.480.00 1,063.50
Total : 1,063.50
36Page:
Packet Page 99 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117158 2/11/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8406055 Water Dept - Valve Boxes
Water Dept - Valve Boxes
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 563.85
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 53.57
Total : 617.42
117159 2/11/2010 043935 UPS 2T4T13050 DELIVERY SERVICE
Overnight mail
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 16.63
Total : 16.63
117160 2/11/2010 062693 US BANK 2462 CDW-Digital Camera Card Reader
CDW-Digital Camera Card Reader
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 117.25
CablesToGo-8 ft Thinnet Coax Cable
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 27.45
apogeekits.com-Anti-Static Mat
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 136.45
LANshack.com-brackets & mounts
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 32.36
Amazon-PRO3000 Tone & Probe Kit
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 73.56
Home Depot-IT Tools
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 344.08
KVMGalore-4 port DVI & USB; 8 port
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 967.00
TigetDirect-AVR Backup Systems
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 799.96
Freight
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 153.97
Total : 2,652.08
117161 2/11/2010 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE 00237 POSTAGE FOR CITY METER
Postage for City Meter250-00237
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 8,000.00
37Page:
Packet Page 100 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 8,000.00 117161 2/11/2010 044300 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE
117162 2/11/2010 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE PO Box 2008 2010 Annual Rental Fee for Edmonds
2010 Annual Rental Fee for Edmonds
411.000.654.534.800.450.00 580.00
2010 Annual Rental Fee for Edmonds
411.000.655.535.800.450.00 580.00
Total : 1,160.00
117163 2/11/2010 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 979993 TEST PLUG
WING NUT TEST PLUG
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.00
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.04
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.42
Total : 39.46
117164 2/11/2010 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 980013 Water - Fittings, Supplies
Water - Fittings, Supplies
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 128.27
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.06
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.62
Total : 156.95
117165 2/11/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 43.02
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 58.75
Total : 101.77
117166 2/11/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-DH0-0667 DEDICATED LINE FS #17 TO SNOCOM
Dedicated Line FS #17 to Snocom
38Page:
Packet Page 101 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117166 2/11/2010 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 375.97
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet425-NW2-0887
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00
Total : 655.97
117167 2/11/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 NW1-0060 03 0210 1079569413 10
BPS TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.34
03 0210 1099569419 02425 NW1-0155 950401
TELEMETRY
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 217.39
03 0210 1014522641 07425-771-5553
AUTO DIALER
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 76.08
Total : 334.81
117168 2/11/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 36.11
Lift St 7425-775-2069
Lift St 7
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 54.27
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 113.97
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.62
Total : 244.97
117169 2/11/2010 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH 22500 U 31 NW 2010 Opertating Permit, System
2010 Opertating Permit, System
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 6,205.30
Total : 6,205.30
39Page:
Packet Page 102 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
117170 2/11/2010 045515 WABO 19678 Leif Bjorback-2010 Annual Education
Leif Bjorback-2010 Annual Education
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 250.00
Pat Lawler-2010 WABO Annual Education19680
Pat Lawler-2010 WABO Annual Education
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 250.00
Linda Thornquist-WABO Annual Education19681
Linda Thornquist-WABO Annual Education
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 125.00
Russell Steinike-2010 WABO Annual19682
Russell Steinike-2010 WABO Annual
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 250.00
Total : 875.00
117171 2/11/2010 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 43232 INV#43232 EDMONDS PD-RAMSEUR 2/5/10
TOWING FORD C/V 448950
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total : 173.01
117172 2/11/2010 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I10005601 INV#I10005601 EDM301
BACKGROUND CHECKS 01/10
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 134.75
Total : 134.75
117173 2/11/2010 070796 WEED GRAAFSTRA & BENSON INC PS 13 ACCT 4181-01M
January, 2010 Legal Services
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 3,394.75
Total : 3,394.75
117174 2/11/2010 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS I0004423 Traffic Control - Traffic Head Supplies
Traffic Control - Traffic Head Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 2,274.60
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 216.09
40Page:
Packet Page 103 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 2,490.69 117174 2/11/2010 069691 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS
117175 2/11/2010 063212 WESTERN TOOL SUPPLY WDL665414 Fac Maint Shop - Router Table
Fac Maint Shop - Router Table
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 389.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 37.05
Total : 427.04
117176 2/11/2010 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 41237001 YOST PARK PLANTING
YOST PARK PLANTING
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,724.25
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 163.81
MINI PARK PLANTING41238001
MINI PARK PLANTING
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 1,127.65
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 107.14
Total : 3,122.85
117177 2/11/2010 073094 WPS-TRICARE Refund 4/12/09 refund ems transport duplicate
refund ems transport duplicate
001.000.000.342.601.000.00 88.85
Total : 88.85
117178 2/11/2010 061047 WWCPA Change Status 2010 Certification Upgrade - Brandon Nilson
Certification Upgrade - Brandon Nilson
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 15.00
Total : 15.00
117179 2/11/2010 067374 XPEDITER TECHNOLOGY LLC 2878 INV#2878 - EDMONDS PD
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 5,237.54
Total : 5,237.54
Bank total : 444,455.31 166 Vouchers for bank code :front
41Page:
Packet Page 104 of 179
02/11/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
12:17:30PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
444,455.31Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 166
42Page:
Packet Page 105 of 179
AM-2786 2.D.
Claims for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Alice Oates ($177.30), Nansi Karlsten (amount
undetermined), and Sara Twigg (amount undetermined).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by
minute entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Alice Oates
7400 158th Street SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
($177.30)
Nansi Karlsten
5892 125th Pl. SW
Mukilteo, WA 98275
(amount undetermined)
Sara Twigg
19813 50th Avenue W.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
(amount undetermined)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Oates Claim for Damages
Link: Karlsten Claim for Damages
Link: Twigg Claim for Damages
Packet Page 106 of 179
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2010 03:13 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/09/2010 03:20 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:31 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 01/29/2010 02:20
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 107 of 179
Packet Page 108 of 179
Packet Page 109 of 179
Packet Page 110 of 179
Packet Page 111 of 179
Packet Page 112 of 179
Packet Page 113 of 179
AM-2810 2.E.
Liquor Control Board January List
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington
State Liquor Control Board, January 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk’s Office, the Police Department, and the Mayor’s Office have reviewed the
attached list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the
liquor licenses for the listed businesses, with the following exceptions: Girasol and Hosoonyi
Restaurant are out of business.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: WSLCB list
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 11:54 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/10/2010 11:55 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 02:11 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 02/10/2010 11:17
AM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 114 of 179
Packet Page 115 of 179
AM-2807 2.F.
Citizen Request to Amend the September 3, 2002 City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Citizen request to amend the September 3, 2002 City Council Minutes.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the City Clerk to amend the September 3, 2002 City Council Minutes.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk's Office received a citizen request to remove her name from the September 3, 2002
City Council Minutes. The citizen's name was included in the minutes as part of the Consent
Agenda related to a Claim for Damages that was submitted. When her name is googled, it appears
on the Internet as a result of being included in the City Council Minutes.
The City Attorney's Office advised that with City Council approval, the citizen's name may be
removed and the minutes amended to reflect that "Jane Doe" submitted the Claim for Damages.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2010 10:53 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/09/2010 12:25 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2010 03:13 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 02/09/2010 10:48
AM
Final Approval Date: 02/09/2010
Packet Page 116 of 179
AM-2806 2.G.
Report on Fnal Construction Costs for the Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Steve Koho Time:Consent
Department:Wastewater Treatment Plant Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on final construction costs for the Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project and Council
acceptance of project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council accept the Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Project.
Previous Council Action
On January 20, 2009, City Council authorized an agreement with Brown & Caldwell to design the
Odor Control Improvement Project.
On October 6, 2009, City Council authorized awarding the construction of the Odor Control
Improvement Project to Prospect Construction, Inc.
Narrative
An evaluation of the Odor Control system at the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant was
performed by a consulting engineer in 2007, which provided a report summarizing their
recommendations for reducing odor emissions from the plant. Brown and Caldwell, the City’s
consultant, performed a detailed construction design in 2009.
Part of the design requires the use of Secondary Clarifier #2, which had sustained rust damage to
the steel components over the last 20 years. Due to the necessity of using this specific tank, staff
hired a firm to sandblast and recoat the steel surfaces to bring the tank back to original condition
for use in the Odor Control Improvements.
The project is now complete, and was designed, inspected and accepted by Staff. The project was
funded by 2009 budgeted appropriations under the Plant’s dedicated 414 Fund, in which outside
agencies share in approximately 50% of capital expenses.
Project Costs
Contractor (Washington Industrial Coatings, Inc.) $94,574
Total $94,574
Fiscal Impact
Packet Page 117 of 179
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Public Works Noel Miller 02/10/2010 08:10 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:25 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/10/2010 08:32 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:43 AM APRV
Form Started By: Steve
Koho
Started On: 02/05/2010 02:36
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 118 of 179
AM-2805 2.H.
Report on Final Construction Costs for the Clay Feeder Project
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Steve Koho Time:Consent
Department:Wastewater Treatment Plant Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on final construction costs for the Clay Feeder Project and Council acceptance of project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council accept the Clay Feeder Project.
Previous Council Action
On June 17, 2008, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a professional services agreement with
KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc. for design services for replacement and/or encasement of
existing underground utilities that will be affected by construction of the BNSF second main track
project.
On November 18, 2008, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to
the agreement for the Underground Utilities portion of the BNSF Double Track Project.
On July 28, 2009, Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 2 and 3
with KPFF Consulting Engineers, Inc. for Underground Utilities Upgrades with respect to the
BNSF Double Track Project.
Narrative
In June 2008, the City entered into a contract with KPFF to design the improvements to the City’s
utility crossings within the BNSF right of way for the future second track along the waterfront.
The utility crossings are being improved to withstand the additional weight imposed by the second
track.
Construction for the underground utilities involves excavation and dewatering to keep
groundwater and/or tidal water below the level of the work being performed. Tests have shown
that a large percentage of the water present in an excavation in the construction area is actually sea
water contaminated by pollutants (heavy metals) from historical industrial activity in the area. The
pollutants prohibit the water from being discharged to the storm water system, and salt water has
caused serious problems in the City’s wastewater treatment plant recently.
Experience in Lynnwood, Washington, Juneau, Alaska and other locations has shown that feeding
a special type of clay to a treatment plant’s incinerator can prevent salt water from causing a
blockage and emergency shutdown. Due to the much higher cost of hauling the dewatering water
Packet Page 119 of 179
away as hazardous waste, staff at the treatment plant offered to have clay feeder equipment
installed in order to allow the construction dewatering flow to be pumped into the sanitary sewer.
Engineering staff agreed, and the equipment was successfully installed at the City’s plant.
The project was designed by KPFF, inspected by Kleinfelder, and accepted by staff. The project
was funded as part of the 412 Utility Fund budgeted appropriations for 2009.
Project Costs
Contractor (Spee West Construction, Inc.) $53,655
Contractor (Ewing Electric) $13,895
Consultant (KPFF) $22,326
Total $89,886
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Public Works Noel Miller 02/10/2010 08:10 AM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:25 AM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/10/2010 08:32 AM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 08:43 AM APRV
Form Started By: Steve
Koho
Started On: 02/05/2010 02:31
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 120 of 179
AM-2809 2.I.
Frontage Improvements at NE Corner of Dayton Street and Third Avenue South
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Conni Curtis
Submitted For:Robert English Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acceptance of project for frontage improvements at NE corner of Dayton Street and Third
Avenue South.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council accept the project for frontage improvements at NE corner of Dayton Street and Third
Avenue South.
Previous Council Action
None.
Narrative
In 2005, a local developer (Charles Greenberg) was issued a commercial permit to build a small
mixed-use building on the NE corner of Dayton Street and Third Avenue South. As a permit
condition, the developer was to improve the frontage adjacent to the building along both streets.
Per requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), a performance bond
was posted in the amount of $24,995 to ensure all required site and public improvements were
completed before the building could be occupied.
Due to economic difficulties, construction was halted in 2008 and the frontage improvements
were not completed within the time specified on the bond. The City notified the Bonding
Company and demanded release of the full bond amount to complete the frontage improvements.
Following procedures for small works projects, a contractor (Salinas Construction) was selected to
complete the frontage improvements. The improvements were installed under a Small Works
Contract, with the project becoming substantially complete in December, 2009. The total
construction cost was $22,787.42
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
Packet Page 121 of 179
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Robert English 02/11/2010 10:17 AM APRV
2 Public Works Noel Miller 02/11/2010 01:18 PM APRV
3 City Clerk Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 02:08 PM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/11/2010 02:10 PM APRV
5 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 02:23 PM APRV
Form Started By: Conni
Curtis
Started On: 02/10/2010 10:52
AM
Final Approval Date: 02/11/2010
Packet Page 122 of 179
AM-2814 2.J.
Interlocal Agreement with State of Washington Department of Printing
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:James Lawless
Submitted For:James Lawless Time:Consent
Department:Police Department Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Interlocal Agreement with State of Washington Department of Printing
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Mayor approved for consent agenda based on prior business practices with State Department of
Printing.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The department is switching to an updated firearms training target. We have utilized the State of
Washington Department of Printing for many years for this purpose. In that the new target is not a
stock product and a "spec" order, the state requires (as a procedural formality) an Interlocal
Agreement with the respective governmental entity. The ILA has been reviewed and approved as
to form by the City Attorney.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: ILA state printing
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 09:53 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/11/2010 12:50 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 02:23 PM APRV
Form Started By: James
Lawless
Started On: 02/11/2010 09:32
AM
Final Approval Date: 02/11/2010
Packet Page 123 of 179
Packet Page 124 of 179
Packet Page 125 of 179
Packet Page 126 of 179
Packet Page 127 of 179
Packet Page 128 of 179
AM-2817 2.K.
Firdale Village: Rezone, Development Agreement, and NGPE.
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Gina Coccia
Submitted For:Gina Coccia Time:Consent
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Firdale Village: Rezone, Development Agreement, and NGPE.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the Rezone ordinance (Exhibit 1) and Development Agreement (Exhibit 2),
authorizing the City Clerk to then record the approved development agreement.
Previous Council Action
On December 15th the Council approved the development agreement (attached as Exhibit 2) with
the condition that the Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) be recorded and brought back
before the Council prior to the development agreement being recorded.
At the same meeting, the proposed rezone was discussed during a closed record review; with
recording of the NGPE, the ordinance implementing the rezone can be approved.
Narrative
This is the final step to complete the rezone process at the Firdale Village site.
The Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) referenced in the development agreement for the
Firdale Village site has been recorded, as required. The condition of the approved development
agreement was that the NGPE get recorded within 60 days of the Council's approval and brought
back before the Council for adoption. Once adopted, the Clerk’s office will record the
development agreement.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Rezone Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: Development Agreement
Link: Exhibit 3: Recorded NGPE
Link: Exhibit 4: 12/15/09 Meeting Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
Packet Page 129 of 179
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 02/12/2010 08:41 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/12/2010 08:43 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/12/2010 09:22 AM APRV
Form Started By: Gina
Coccia
Started On: 02/11/2010 04:14
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/12/2010
Packet Page 130 of 179
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
12/10/09
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
KNOWN AS “FIRDALE VILLAGE” FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
BUSINESS (BN) TO “FIRDALE VILLAGE MIXED USE”
(FVMU) ZONE, ESTABLISHING AS A CONDITION
THEREFOR THE EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND FIXING A TIME
WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the applicant A. D. Shapiro Architects, PS, submitted an application
to rezone certain real property located 9617 Firdale Avenue, commonly known as “Firdale
Village”; and
WHEREAS, the application was accompanied by an application for a
development agreement which was intended to provide assurance that a vegetative buffer of old
growth trees would be preserved; and
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2009, the Edmonds Planning Board reviewed the
rezone application and development agreement and recommended adoption of the ordinance
subject to approval of the development agreement; and
WHEREAS, by contemporaneous action, the City Council has approved the
development agreement; and
WHEREAS, said development agreement is effective only if a native growth
protection easement protecting the buffer is recorded within sixty (60) days if its approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approves this rezone conditional upon confirmation
that the applicant has met its obligations under t his Development Agreement; and
{WSS753839.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
Packet Page 131 of 179
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has advised the City Council that the Native Growth
Protection Easement has been filed in an approved format; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the criteria of ECDC 20.40.010 has been
met and for their findings adopt by reference in pages 6 through 10 of the staff report presented
to the Planning Board on December 9, 2009 and incorporated in the record of this proceeding, as
fully as if herein set forth.
Section 2. This ordinance has been placed upon the Council’s consent agenda for
approval based upon notification by the City Clerk of the Native Growth Protection Easement
required by the Development Agreement, and has been filed of record with Snohomish County.
Section 3. Certain real property located at 9617 Firdale Avenue legally described
as shown on Exhibit A of the Development Agreement, and described in Planning File PLN-
2009-0020 and consisting of approximately 3.2 acres is hereby approved for rezone from
“Neighborhood Business” (BN) to “Firdale Village Mixed Use” (FVMU).
Section 4. The Planning Manager and staff are hereby authorized to effectuate
appropriate changes in the zoning map to show the subject site to be zoned as Firdale Village
Mixed Use.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
{WSS753839.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
Packet Page 132 of 179
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
{WSS753839.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 -
Packet Page 133 of 179
{WSS753839.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 4 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, REZONING CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS “FIRDALE VILLAGE” FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
BUSINESS (BN) TO “FIRDALE VILLAGE MIXED USE” (FVMU) ZONE, ESTABLISHING
AS A CONDITION THEREFOR THE EXECUTION AND RECORDING OF A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 134 of 179
D R A F T
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70B.170 et seq and Title 20 of the Edmonds Community
Development Code authorize Development Agreements between the City of Edmonds and
persons having ownership or control over real property regarding the imposition of development
standards and other provisions that apply to, govern and vest the development, use and
mitigation of the development of real property governed by the agreement, and
WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner has applied to the City for the creation of a
new zoning district to be known as the Firdale Village Mixed-Use Zone, and
WHEREAS, in its proposal, the owner has proposed the establishment of a native growth
protection area within a buffer in order to protect an existing stand of native trees located along
the north boundary of the property, and
WHEREAS, while the owner has voluntarily proposed such an imposition, the parties to
this agreement are cognizant of the provisions of RCW 82.02.020 as interpreted by the
Washington Court of Appeals in Citizens Alliance for Property Rights v. Sims, 145 Wash. App.
649 (2008), and
WHEREAS, jurisdictions are required to show that clearing requirements, native growth
set-asides and other similar protections fall within the exception created in RCW 82.02.020 as
necessary to “mitigate a direct impact that has been identified as a consequence of a proposed
development, subdivision, or plat,” and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter into this agreement as a part of and as an adjunct to
the creation of a new zone in order that the owner can voluntarily create a Native Growth
Protection Easement for the protection of an existing stand of trees thereby ensuring the
protection and maintenance of such nature trees, and
WHEREAS, the City, by the approval of this agreement and a concurrent enactment of a
zoning ordinance of even date establishing the Firdale Village mixed use zone, finds that such
proposed zoning change, conditioned as set forth in this agreement, meets the criteria of its
comprehensive plan and zoning code: [please insert referenced to Comp Plan policies that
would be promoted], NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED, and the
authorization of RCW 35.70B.170 et seq, the parties have entered into this Agreement under the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
{WSS742015.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }
1
Packet Page 135 of 179
1. Parties.
1.1 “City” shall mean the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal
corporation.
1.2 “Developer” shall mean the undersigned property owner,
_________________ a Washington corporation.
2. Subject Property.
2.1 “Site.” The private property subject to this Agreement is shown on the
attached Exhibit A and is legally described on attached Exhibit B. This development agreement
relates to the development the establishment on the site of a Native Growth Protection Easement
and vesting to the terms of the Firdale Zone.
2.2 “Native Growth Protection Easement” in the form shown on the attached
Exhibit C shall be established in order to preserve and protect the existing stand of fir trees on
the site. The Native Growth Protection Easement shall be preserved and maintained in
accordance with the provisions of the attached covenant, incorporated by this reference as fully
as if herein set forth.
2.3 “Firdale Zone” shall mean the proposed Chapter 16.100 ECDC as actually
adopted by the City.
3. Purposes. The primary purpose of this Agreement is to preserve and protect the
stand of native trees on the north boundary of the site and for the Developer to acknowledge that
the covenant protecting such trees by Native Growth Protection Easement has been voluntarily
created in order to provide evidence of and in furtherance of the Comprehensive Plan goals
referenced herein. The establishment of this Native Growth Protection Easement is the voluntary
act of the Developer and serves as consideration for the City’s promises as contained herein.
4. Term.
4.1 The term of this Agreement shall be five years following the date of
approval of this agreement by the Edmonds City Council. No amendment of this agreement may
be undertaken without the express written consent of the parties, and following public hearing.
The initial approval of this agreement and any amendment thereof are development agreements
adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170 et seq. Because such agreement is by its vesting provision
(see 5.2 below) linked to the issuance of a development permit, it is subject to review pursuant to
RCW 36.70C of the Revised Code of Washington.
4.2 The obligations established by the parties shall be completed within the
five year period, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the life of
the Native Growth Protection Easement created pursuant to this agreement. The Native Growth
Protection Easement shall continue in perpetuity until released by the City.
{WSS742015.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }
2
Packet Page 136 of 179
5. Obligations of the Parties.
5.1 The Developer shall, at its cost, within sixty days of the date of approval
of this agreement, record the Native Growth Protection Easement in the form shown on the
attached Exhibit C in the land records of Snohomish County, Washington.
5.2 Upon recording of the Easement, the Developer shall vest in the right to
develop the site in accordance with the terms, standards and requirements set forth in the Firdale
Village Mixed-Use Zone, Chapter 16.100 and the Design Standards contained in 22.100 of the
Edmonds Community Development Code. Regardless of any change in these provisions of the
Code, the Developer shall be vested in the provisions of the Code as it is adopted this date for a
period of five years. This vesting right must be exercised by the filing of a fully completed
development permit application, with fees fully paid, within the five year period. The
development application shall be subject to all requirements of Title 20 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code and the procedures and processes established thereunder by such
Code as the same exists on the date of this agreement, and shall also be vested for the five year
period.
6. Indemnity.
6.1 The Developer agrees to in indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim, loss or liability of any kind or nature arising from
or out of the approval of this Agreement. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless
specifically includes the reasonable costs of legal defense by counsel of the City’s choosing of
this Agreement, and/or of any other claim, loss or liability arising from the Developer’s actions.
The indemnitor Developer also waives any immunity which it may have under Title 51 RCW to,
but only to, the extent necessary to indemnify the City, its officers, agents and employees.
Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require the Developer to indemnify the City from the
intentional wrongful acts of its officers, agents or employees or the concurrent negligence of the
City, as determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
6.2 The City promises to indemnify and hold harmless the Developer, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim, loss or liability arising from the negligence,
tortious or intentional wrongful or illegal act of the City in the execution of the City’s obligations
under this Agreement. This promise to indemnify and hold harmless shall include the reasonable
costs of legal defense by counsel of the Developer’s choosing. The indemnitor City also waives
any immunity which it may have under Title 51 RCW to, but only to, the extent necessary to
fully indemnify the Developer, its officers, agents and employees. Nothing herein shall be
interpreted to require the City to indemnify the Developer from the intentional wrongful acts of
its officers, agents or employees, or the concurrent negligence of the Developer as determined in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
6.3 These indemnity and hold harmless agreements have been mutually
negotiated by the parties as a part of this Agreement.
{WSS742015.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }
3
Packet Page 137 of 179
7. Venue. The sole venue for interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement
shall be the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington.
8. Reservation of Authority. In accordance with the requirements of RCW
36.70B.170, this Development Agreement expressly reserves authority to impose new or
different regulations to the extent required by serious threat to public health and safety.
9. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded with the Snohomish County
Auditor at the expense of the Developer.
CITY OF EDMONDS
By:
Mayor Gary Haakenson
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
By:
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney
DEVELOPER
By:
Its:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _________________________ is the
person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument,
on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the
____________________ of ______________________________________ to be the free and
voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED: ___________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
{WSS742015.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }
4
Packet Page 138 of 179
{WSS742015.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }
5
Printed Name:
My appointment expires:
Packet Page 139 of 179
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
4
0
o
f
1
7
9
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
4
1
o
f
1
7
9
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
4
2
o
f
1
7
9
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
4
3
o
f
1
7
9
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
December 15, 2009
At 6:45 p.m., the City Council interviewed the following candidates for the Historic Preservation
Commission and Planning Board: John Dewhirst, Lois Broadway and Todd Cloutier. Mayor Haakenson,
and Councilmembers Plunkett, Bernheim, Orvis and Wambolt were present at 6:45 p.m.
Councilmembers Peterson and Wilson arrived at 6:50 p.m.
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
D. J. Wilson, Council President
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Lorenzo Hines, Finance Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Debi Humann, Human Resources Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Eng. Program Mgr.
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Gina Coccia, Planner
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Council President Wilson requested Item O be removed from the Consent Agenda, Councilmember
Plunkett requested Item R be removed, and Councilmember Wambolt requested Item U be removed.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 2009.
Packet Page 144 of 179
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 7
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON,
FOR APPROVAL OF THE INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 3769 RELATED TO
TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTERS AND ENCAMPMENTS. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
6. RESOLUTION ON RENAMING KAIREZ DRIVE.
Council President Wilson explained the Vista Del Mar Homeowner’s association President contacted him
with a request to rename Kairez Drive. There are two processes, one that costs thousands of dollars and a
second virtually no cost option where Council can direct staff to rename the street.
Ross Marturano, President, Vista Del Mar Homeowners Association, identified five residents of Vista
Del Mar in the audience. He explained there are nine existing homes in Vista Del Mar, two pending sales
and several undeveloped lots. Of the 15 lots, 13 voted in favor of the name change, 1 abstained and 1
voted no. He explained the name Kairez has negative connotations in the neighborhood particularly with
the Police Department. The street was originally known as 92nd Place West and changed to Kairez; the
plat is known as Vista Del Mar. A vote was taken in accordance with the Vista Del Mar Homeowner
Association’s CC&Rs and they are petitioning the Council to change the name. There is no implication
with the title company other than the City must file the name change with Snohomish County.
Council President Wilson inquired about a private road versus public road. Mr. Marturano replied they
are willing to have the road public or private. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained this only initiated the
process and set the public hearing. Staff will provide a response by the public hearing regarding the
public versus private road issue. He requested a copy of the Vista Del Mar Homeowners Association
CC&Rs.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1214 INITIATING THE PROCESS TO RENAME KAIREZ
DRIVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN ORDER
TO IMPLEMENT A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR THE PROPERTIES KNOWN AS “FIRDALE
VILLAGE” FROM "NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS" (BN) TO THE “FIRDALE VILLAGE
MIXED USE” (FVMU) ZONE AND ESTABLISH A TREE RETENTION BUFFER.
Planner Gina Coccia explained Firdale Village is located at 9617 Firdale Avenue, contains 3.2 acres and 8
parcels. The buildings were constructed in 1942, annexed into the City in 1997 and the site is currently
zoned Neighborhood Business (BN). The City received one public comment that is included in Exhibit 1
of Attachment 10. No public testimony was provided at the Planning Board public hearing.
She explained this item included a rezone and development agreement. The Planning Board
recommended approval of both the rezone and development agreement. The Planning Board’s draft
minutes are attached in Exhibit 2. In 2006 the Comprehensive Plan was amended to add goals and
policies for this neighborhood. A code amendment establishing a Firdale Village Mixed Use Zone
(FVMU) and corresponding design standards was approved in October 2009.
Ms. Coccia explained this was two separate actions, 1) a public hearing on the proposed development
agreement and 2) a closed record review of the proposed change in zoning from BN to FVMU. The
application requires compliance with ECDC 20.01 Types of Development, 20.08 Development
Agreements, 20.40 Rezones as well as with the Comprehensive Plan. She explained the development
agreement is a Type V legislative application. The Planning Board conducts an open record public
hearing and forwards a recommendation to the Council for final decision. The City Council may hold its
Packet Page 145 of 179
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 8
own public hearing. The rezone is a Type IVB application; the Planning Board conducts an open record
public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for a final decision. The Council
holds a closed record review which is being done tonight.
Ms. Coccia referred to Exhibit 3, the development agreement, explaining the City recently adopted a
development agreement process, ECDC 20.08, which functions similar to a contract rezone process where
the property owner deliberately enters into an agreement offering mitigation for the zone change. In this
case, the owner has offered to retain a large stand of mature trees along the north property line which
would ease the transition between the single family neighborhood to the north and the proposed mixed
use site at Firdale Village.
Factors for the Council to consider in a rezone are consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, zoning
consistency, relationship of the rezone to nearby property, changes in the surrounding area or policy,
economic and physical suitability, and the relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared
to the potential increase/decrease in value to the property owners,
Mayor Haakenson advised the Council would first hold the public hearing on the development agreement
followed by the closed record review.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether Tony Shapiro was the applicant for both the development
agreement and the rezone. Ms. Coccia answered he was.
Councilmember Orvis referred to Exhibit C which is referred to in the development agreement as the
Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) which refers to an Exhibit A. Ms. Coccia answered Exhibit
A refers to the site map attached to the development agreement. She explained the NGPE is the setback
along the north side of the property. Councilmember Orvis observed the development agreement did not
specifically refer to a NGPE on a map. Ms. Coccia advised the NGPE was also identified on Exhibit C.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the development agreement indicates a document in substantially
the form shown needs to be recorded within 60 days or the agreement is not valid. The developer needs
to return with a signed copy ready for recording and at that time a legal description would be provided
that matched the map so that the recorded document would have its own Exhibit A that identifies the
NGPE. Councilmember Orvis observed the Council was voting on a NGPE that was not identified. Mr.
Snyder explained if the Council approved the rezone ordinance, before it is placed on the Consent Agenda
for approval, staff would have a recorded document that matched the exhibit. Ms. Coccia displayed
Exhibit A and identified the location of the NGPE.
Councilmember Orvis asked whether there was any legal obligation to replace a tree that fell in the
NGPE. Mr. Snyder answered there was no replacement requirement; a provision requiring replacement
could be added. Councilmember Orvis responded he would like to include such a provision.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, urged the Council not to vote on the development agreement until it was in its
final form. The development agreement failed to require that commercial development accompany
residential and feared the result would be residential development similar to Pt. Edwards. She anticipated
the developer would develop the residential portion and then say the commercial was not feasible which
would result in the loss of a neighborhood business district. She questioned whether the development
agreement was a mechanism to avoid SEPA. She recalled being told in October that the traffic,
intersection level of service, would be addressed in the SEPA review. However, the same SEPA used
earlier in the process was being used for the rezone and development agreement. She cited answers to
questions in the SEPA checklist: what percentage of the site would be covered with impervious surface -
Packet Page 146 of 179
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 9
none; will any structures be demolished - no; how many parking spaces will be created or eliminated -
unknown; and how many vehicle trips per day will be generated - unknown. She urged the Council not to
adopt the development agreement.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public hearing.
Council President Wilson recalled the development agreement was deemed the best mechanism for
retaining the trees. Mr. Snyder agreed, explaining the initial ordinance imposing a tree buffer did not
comply with recent Washington case law; there was no legislative record that established the need and
why the tree buffer was the appropriate amount. He suggested retaining the trees via establishing a NGPE
in a development agreement.
For Councilmember Orvis, Mr. Snyder explained the property owner can remove dead or diseased trees in
the NGPE and the City has the right but not the obligation to replant and restock plants or animal habitat
or any other actions appropriate for preservation. The Council could require the property owner to replant
and restock.
With regard to SEPA, Mr. Chave explained this was not the end of the process. The project level SEPA
would occur later in the process at the time of design review.
Councilmember Orvis recalled during the development of the code to create the zone, there were
stepbacks incorporated on portions of the site where there was no buffer. He observed the stepbacks were
not required in the area where the trees would be retained. Mr. Chave agreed, explaining the intent of the
development agreement was to ensure the trees were retained in the buffer. The zone specifies stepbacks
in the areas where the buffer does not exist.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT,
TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
Council President Wilson explained this put in place the zoning criteria and the design standards the
Council adopted via a 6-1 vote in October and this was the appropriate next step to retain the trees on the
site.
Councilmember Orvis recalled he voted against the zone, commenting the buffer was the key piece and
allowed the Council to approve a 50-foot building within 20 feet of a residential zone. He was not
convinced the development agreement would establish a NGPE because there was no map that identified
the area and it put the onerous on the City to plant the trees. He preferred the developer be required to
replace and maintain the trees in the buffer. He did not support the development agreement.
Councilmember Plunkett asked the applicant whether the developer would take responsibility for the
trees. Tony Shapiro responded a survey was done of the site that shows the exact location and size of the
trees. The trees are substantial firs that range from 50 to 100 feet tall and are 50+ years old. He assured
20 feet was more than enough to protect the trees and the criteria require that no construction occur under
the trees. The trees are located at the top of a bank; the site slopes from the north property line to Firdale
Avenue and much of the grade change occurs at the north property line. The 20 foot area where the trees
are located is essentially a plateau and there is a rockery in some areas that drops away 12 feet or more
where the construction would occur.
Mr. Shapiro disagreed that a 50-foot building would be located adjacent to the setback because the height
calculation is based on the average grade from the four corners. This takes into account the lower portion
of the site and results in a 2-3 story building adjacent to the single family development. He noted there
were no zones in the city that required more than a 15-foot rear-yard setback; they proposed 20 feet to
Packet Page 147 of 179
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 10
protect the trees. He did not anticipate his client would object to the Council including a maintenance
clause that would require replacement of a tree that died. He questioned the survivability of a small
replacement tree due to the high tree canopy.
MOTION CARRIED (4-2), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND BERNHEIM VOTING NO.
Mayor Haakenson advised the closed record review on the rezone was a quasi judicial matter. The parties
of record are Mr. Shapiro, representatives of WNS Property Investment and Tamara Ancona who
submitted an email. Only Mr. Shapiro is present. He invited Councilmembers to make any disclosures
with regard to those parties of record.
Councilmember Wambolt disclosed he received a small contribution from one of the owners of Firdale
Village.
Councilmember Plunkett disclosed one of the owners sent him a campaign donation which he returned.
Council President Wilson commented he had been extensively involved in the zone rewrite for the past
four months. He had not received any political donations from any of the parities. He asked whether he
needed to recuse himself due to his involvement in the zoning rewrite. Mr. Snyder responded Council
President Wilson’s involvement in a legislative process did not disqualify him from participation. The
only reason for disqualification was if he had communications that were not summarized in the last
process or that he had already made up his mind about the action, pre-judgmental bias. Council President
Wilson recused himself because of the perception that he may have prejudged the matter. Council
President Wilson left the dais and the room.
Mayor Haakenson asked Councilmember Wambolt and Councilmember Plunkett whether they were able
to review and make a fair decision on the matter. Both answered they could. Mayor Haakenson asked
whether Mr. Shapiro had any objection to Councilmembers Plunkett or Wambolt participating in the
closed record review. Mr. Shapiro responded he did not object to their participation.
Ms. Coccia advised Exhibit 1, the staff report, includes an analysis of the rezone criteria as well as the
ordinance establishing the FVMU Zone. Mr. Snyder explained the Council would be making a
conceptual approval; when a development agreement in a suitable format with the NGPE is recorded,
staff would schedule the ordinance rezoning the property from Neighborhood Business (BN) to FVMU
on a future Council’s agenda.
Mayor Haakenson observed the FVMU zone and corresponding design standards were approved by the
Council on October 6 and the ordinance adopted on October 27. This is a continuation of that process.
Ms. Coccia agreed.
Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the Planning Board had reviewed the rezone. Ms. Coccia
answered they had; the draft Planning Board minutes were included as Exhibit 2. Only the applicant and
staff spoke at the Planning Board public hearing.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether in the FVMU zone approved on October 6, the language in the
zone would not be changed for five years. Mr. Snyder agreed.
Tony Shapiro referred to Attachment 7 on page 6, Section 16.100.040.A, addresses 25% of the heated
space of the built area must be in commercial. This was included in response to concern expressed by the
community that the development would be entirely residential. The materials provided to the Planning
Board also reviewed how the proposed rezone complies with the six criteria.
Packet Page 148 of 179
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
December 15, 2009
Page 11
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON,
TO RETURN WITH AN ORDINANCE ON A FUTURE AGENDA THAT REZONED THE
PROPERTY FROM NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN) TO FIRDALE VILLAGE MIXED USE
(FVMU).
Councilmember Bernheim commented he was uncomfortable with some of the language in the zone
particularly the modulated building design allowing for greater building height. However, due to the need
to make progress on neighborhood redevelopment, although it may not be perfect, the City could learn
from any mistakes in future neighborhood developments.
MOTION CARRIED (4-1), COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS VOTING NO. (Council President Wilson
did not participate in the vote.)
(Council President Wilson returned to the dais.)
8. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FINAL ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2009 BUDGET:
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3711 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS,
Finance Director Lorenzo Hines explained the budget amendment was presented to the Finance
Committee on November 17 and remanded to Council for review.
For Councilmember Bernheim, Mr. Hines explained this agenda item contained Exhibits A, B and C and
a General Fund Summary and an Other Fund Summary. Councilmember Bernheim observed the Other
Fund Summary was entitled City of Edmonds Ordinance Amendments 11/17/09. He pointed out the
agenda memo refers to three attachments, 2009 Final Budget Ordinance, 2009 Other Fund Summary and
General Fund Summary. Mr. Hines advised the agenda memo included the General Fund Summary and
the Other Fund Summary. Councilmember Bernheim commented on the difficulty determining which
documents were referred to in the agenda memo when the title of the document was different. Mayor
Haakenson assured staff would label them more appropriately in the future.
Councilmember Bernheim expressed concern that he was unable to adequately review the information
because the attachments were not properly identified in the materials. Mr. Hines commented the
documents had been available to the Council since November 17. He noted he had been unable to
respond to Councilmember Bernheim’s Monday email.
City Attorney Scott Snyder suggested amending Section 1 of the ordinance to state that Exhibit A
consisted of 7 pages. Mr. Hines explained the materials that were historically incorporated into the
ordinance were limited to Exhibit A; the other materials were additional information.
Councilmember Wambolt agreed with Councilmember Bernheim that the documents should be labeled
more appropriately. Mr. Hines agreed that would be done in the future.
Councilmember Orvis referred to the General Fund Amendment to Revenues, observing some of the new
revenues were pass-throughs such as the WASPC Grant. He asked how many were pass-throughs versus
new revenue. Mr. Hines referred to Other Revenues Augmentations Offset with Related Expenses, noting
funds were shown in that section as well as in Other Expense Augmentations Offset with Related
Revenues. The amendments to budget expenses include $155,000 to the City Attorney and Eliminating
the A-Fund Contributions - ERR fund for October, November and December. Mr. Hines explained the
A-Found Contribution; each fund is required to contribute to the Equipment Reserve Fund. Due to
vacancies and expenditure reductions, the Equipment Reserve Fund is able to maintain an adequate
balance through yearend; therefore, contributions from the other funds are not necessary resulting in a
reduction in the expense.
Packet Page 149 of 179
AM-2812 3.
Confirmation of ADB Candidate
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:10 Minutes
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Confirmation of Mayor's appointment to the Architectural Design Board.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
The Mayor recommends confirmation of Lois Broadway to the Architect position.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Lois was appointed by Mayor Haakenson to fill the Architect position (position #1) on the
ADB. This is an unexpired term through December 2012. She was interviewed by the City
Council on February 2, 2010.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Application
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 04:21 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/10/2010 04:33 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 04:34 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 02/10/2010 03:32
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/10/2010
Packet Page 150 of 179
Packet Page 151 of 179
AM-2813 5.
City of Edmonds Website - City Council and Council Member Web Pages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Time:20 Minutes
Department:Community Services Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
City of Edmonds Website - City Council and Council Member Web Pages.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
See Pages 4 and 5 of the attached February 10. 2009 Report for recommendations.
Previous Council Action
2002 - The City Council discussed during their retreat, access and linkage policies related to the
City's website which are still in use today.
November 2, 2009 - the City Council requested staff bring back policies for an option 2+ that
allows for as wide a distribution of information as possible without any campaign or personal
material or links.
Narrative
See attached February 10, 2010 Staff Report.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Staff Report for February 16, 2010 City Council meeting
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/10/2010 05:29 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/11/2010 08:51 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 09:14 AM APRV
Form Started By: Stephen
Clifton
Started On: 02/10/2010 04:21
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/11/2010
Packet Page 152 of 179
City of Edmonds
Community Services Department
Economic Development Department
Date: February 10, 2009
To: Mayor Haakenson and Edmonds City Council
From: Stephen Clifton, AICP
Community Services and Economic Development Director
Subject: Edmonds City Council and Council Member Web Pages
Updated report and recommendations
Background
Over the past several months, City staff have been updating City of Edmonds website web
pages in an attempt to provide more effective and useful information to website visitors.
Although the City does not employ a Webmaster, the City does utilize the services of a
contractor to assist with website maintenance. As such, the responsibility for updating web
pages and formatting rest with existing City staff. Website development is ever evolving and
is a product of numerous contributions by individuals throughout the City and increasing the
accessibility of information contained within the City’s website is a primary goal of City
Administration.
At the request of Council President Wilson, City Council web pages have been an area where
City staff have focused our efforts. As such, visitors to the City’s website can now find an
updated City Council web page http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/cityCouncil.stm. On this web
page, visitors can find information about the Council’s adopted 2009 sustainability agenda,
meeting schedule, general contact information, and associated web links to individual
Council member web pages (Attachment 1).
As stated in Scott Snyder’s September 3, 2009 memorandum to the City Council, given the
flurry of e-mails recently regarding the website (City Council web pages), and the indication
that the City Council wishes to review the use of Council biographical material in light of
these e-mails, he prepared comments for consideration by the City Council (see Attachment
2). According to the memorandum, the Council has a number of options with regard to the
website. These include: 1) listing names, dates, places and basic factual biographical
information with no statements of philosophy or references to pending legislative issues, 2)
permit each Councilmember to state his or her general philosophy and address pending
issues of note in the Edmonds community, and/or 3) a limited forum approach for Council
consideration. This approach would place the photographs and voters’ pamphlet information
on the City website to provide the public with information relating to the candidates for
public office and other issues on the Edmonds ballot. A link could be provided to each
{ERZ706668.DOC;1/00006.080057/}City of Edmonds Community Services and Economic
Development
Packet Page 153 of 179
candidate’s website where additional information could be obtained. This would provide
information in a neutral fashion to Edmonds voters in a controlled format without opening
the City’s website as an open public forum.
In a September 22, 2009, Washington State Public Disclosure Commission decision, the
Public Disclosure Commission stated the RCW 42.17.130 does not prohibit elected officials
from communicating with the public concerning the issues they are working on and their
goals while in office. It is important, however, that this type of communication not be used
to campaign for re-election, and it would be prudent to establish standards for what is
expected on a biography page of the City’s website.
City Council and City Council member web pages policies
The City of Edmonds does not currently have policies specifically related to the content of
City Council or Council member web pages. As such, City of Edmonds staff contacted many
cities to request information about website policies and viewed the websites of these cities
to see what is actually on their individual City Council member web pages.
City Council web pages
As noted above, City of Edmonds staff contacted several cities to request policies related to
posting information on City Council web pages in addition to contacting Municipal Research
Services Corporation. We received responses from the cities of Bellevue, Kent, Federal
Way, Everett, Kirkland, Lynnwood, Mukilteo, Redmond, Renton and Shoreline. Only the
Cities of Bellevue and Shoreline contained references related to City Council information;
these include the following:
Bellevue:
Content: “All content on the city's web site will be sponsored or co-sponsored by the
city or directly linked to the city’s policy objectives or departmental activities.
Content will accurately reflect City Council and management policy positions. Political
advocacy by individuals or interest groups, including current and former elected
officials, is not appropriate material for the City of Bellevue web site.”
Links: “Types of sites to which the city does not provide links are:
Candidate sites and sites advocating positions on ballot propositions (See
“Fair Campaign Practices” section below)
Individual personal homepages”
Fair Campaign Practices: “To avoid the appearance of endorsement of political
content, links will not be made to sites that are associated with, sponsored by, or
serve a candidate for elected office, any political party or organization supporting or
seeking to defeat any candidate for elective office, or any ballot proposal. Links to
factual information prepared by the city or other public organizations--such as the
King County Voters’ Pamphlet, Municipal League, and League of Women Voters--may
be provided as public information.”
Shoreline:
Links: “The City does not provide links to:
Sites associated with, sponsored by or serving a candidate for elected office
Sites supporting, endorsing or seeking to defeat any candidate for elective office,
or any ballot proposal
Individual personal homepages”
2
Packet Page 154 of 179
City staff also reviewed the Council web pages for Snohomish County
http://www1.co.snohomish.wa.us/Departments/Council/, King County
http://www.kingcounty.gov/council.aspx, and other web sites. Posted on these websites is
information related to council member press releases, news, hot topics and other issues of
significance to the County or City Councils.
City Council member web pages
City staff have also compared existing Edmonds City Council member web pages with
examples from ten cities within the Puget Sound region, i.e., Bellevue, Kent, Federal Way,
Everett, Kirkland, Lynnwood, Mukilteo, Redmond, Renton and Shoreline. See Attachment 3
for examples of these web pages. Based on our review, City of Edmonds Council member
web pages align most closely with Option 1 above, i.e., names, dates, committee
assignments, places and basic factual biographical information with limited philosophical
narrative or references to pending legislative issues. This is also the case with eight of the
ten cities reviewed. The Cities of Renton and Lynnwood included statements that could, to
a minor extent, be interpreted to relate to both Options 1 and 2. None of the ten cities
provide information related to Option 3.
City staff also reviewed Council member web pages for Snohomish County, e.g.,
http://www1.co.snohomish.wa.us/Departments/Council/Districts/District_4/, and King
County, e.g., http://www.kingcounty.gov/Gossett.aspx, and other City web sites.
Information that has been posted on these web pages relates to news, e-newsletters, links
to newspaper articles (e.g., editorials), and other issues of significance to County Council
members.
City of Edmonds website access and linkage policy
The City of Edmonds currently uses an access and linkage policy discussed during the 2002
City Council retreat. While the existing policy does not contain specific guidance on what
can be placed on the City Council or Council members’ web pages, it does provide
clarification that the City of Edmonds does not provide web site hosting for the general
public, but does provide internet links to the web sites of designated government, non-
profit, civic and local organizations that have a recognized relationship with the City of
Edmonds.
November 2, 2009 City Council motion
As referenced within October 29, 2009 staff report, City staff are in the process of updating
City website web pages in an attempt to provide more effective and useful information to
website visitors. City staff is also discussing creating website standards or coordinating
committee to create, maintain, and monitor information placed on the City’s website. As
such, City staff expects to address this issue further when a committee is formed.
During the November 2, 2009 City Council meeting, the City Council voted 5-2, to ask staff
to bring back policies for an option 2+ that allows for a wide a distribution of information as
possible without any campaign or personal material or links. As mentioned earlier, Council
and Council member web pages for Snohomish and King Counties and other web sites,
including the City of Renton http://www.rentonwa.gov/government/default.aspx?id=1082,
offer examples of the kinds of information and/or links related to news, hot topics and other
3
Packet Page 155 of 179
issues of significance that could meet the intent of the Edmonds City Council request to
provide a wide distribution of information as possible.
Recommendation
When considering the kind of information the City Council wishes to place on City Council
and Council member web pages, although the Cities of Bellevue and Shoreline provide
policies/guidance which could serve the City of Edmonds well if adopted. The request by
the Edmonds City Council to broaden the kinds of information that could be posted to the
City Council and Council member web pages, the following policies are proposed for the City
Council web page:
City Council webpage – allowed content:
Information sponsored or co-sponsored by the city council or directly linked to
city policy objectives
Information that accurately reflects City Council policy positions
Broad based items of significance, e.g., Council Hot Topics and/or News
Links to factual information prepared by the city or other public organizations
o Examples include: Snohomish County or Washington State Voters’
Pamphlets, Municipal League, and League of Women Voters as public
information.
Links to newspaper or magazine articles about Edmonds (see exceptions
regarding political advocacy)
Governmental and public educational institutions located within the State of
Washington
Links to local organizations having a recognized relationship with the City of
Edmonds or with which the City of Edmonds partners in order to provide
services, including but not limited to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce,
Port of Edmonds, and Stevens Hospital
Links to local cultural, artistic, civic or non-profit recreational organizations
having either a recognized relationship with the City of Edmonds or specific
and direct relevance to City residents
City Council webpage - content not allowed:
Political advocacy
Links to sites that are associated with, sponsored by, or serve a candidate for
elected office, any political party or organization supporting or seeking to
defeat any candidate for elective office (to avoid the appearance of endorsing
political content)
Links to sites advocating positions on ballot propositions
o RCW 41.06.250; RCW 42.130; RCW 41.17.190
Links to personal homepages
When considering the kind of information the City Council wishes to place on City Council
member web pages, using an Option 1 format would provide the most consistent
information to web users. However, in light of the November 2, 2009 City Council motion to
propose policies for an Option 2+ that allows for a wide a distribution of information as
possible without any campaign or personal material or links, the following policies are
proposed for each Council member’s web page:
4
Packet Page 156 of 179
5
Allowed content:
City Council name and position number
Contact information
Year elected to the City Council
Number of terms served
Current Council committees and appointments
Former Council committees and assignments
Regional Representation
Links to E-Newsletters (see content not allowed below)
Links to news related to City Council member activities (see content not
allowed below)
Links to newspaper articles, op-ed pieces, editorials, or opinions written by a
City Council member (see content not allowed below)
Community Service (optional)
Employment (optional)
Education (optional)
Personal factual biographical information, e.g., birthplace, marital status,
length of residency, children, etc. (optional)
Content not allowed:
Political advocacy
Comments that endorse or oppose political candidates or ballot propositions
Links to sites that endorse or oppose ballot propositions
Links to sites that are associated with, sponsored by, or serve a candidate for
elected office, any political party or organization supporting or seeking to
defeat any candidate for elective office, including a Council member’s
campaign site
NOTE: Maintains the appearance of not endorsing political content (RCW
41.06.250; RCW 42.17.130; RCW 42.17.190)
Promotion or advertising of commercial services, entities, or products
Links to personal homepages
Although the City Council did not specifically address the use of Social Media by City Council
members, because City elected officials do currently use twitter and facebook, in addition to
blogging, city staff reviewed draft policies being considered by the City of Seattle as it
relates to use of social media by council members, and spoke to City of Seattle Staff
regarding these policies. Based on our review of these policies, the following are Social
Media related policies the City Council could consider adopting:
Council member’s social media site(s) should contain links directing users
back to the Council’s official website for in-depth information, forms,
documents or online services necessary to conduct official City business.
Social media tools are not to be used as mechanisms for conducting official
city business other than to informally communicate with the public. Examples
of business that may not be conducted through social media include making
policy decisions, official public noticing, and discussing items of legal or fiscal
significance that has not previously been released to the public by the City.
Packet Page 157 of 179
AM-2816 6.
Quasi Judicial Training
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:45 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Quasi Judicial Training by City Attorney.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Training to be provided by City Attorney regarding quasi judicial matters.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Open Public Meetings
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 02:22 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/11/2010 02:24 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/11/2010 03:24 PM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Hynd
Started On: 02/11/2010 02:16
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/11/2010
Packet Page 158 of 179
The Law and the Meeting
I. The Open Public Meetings Act, Chapter 42.30 RCW.
A. Purpose (RCW 42.30.010)
The legislature finds and declares that all public commissions, boards, councils,
committees, subcommittees, departments, divisions, offices, and all other public
agencies of this state and subdivisions thereof exist to aid in the conduct of the people's
business. It is the intent of this chapter that their actions be taken openly and that their
deliberations be conducted openly.
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.
The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide
what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people
insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they
have created.
B. Open Meetings Required (RCW 42.30.030)
1. RCW 42.30.030: "All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall
be open and public and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of
the governing body of a public agency, except as otherwise provided in this
chapter.”
2. Definitions (RCW 42.30.020)
a. Meeting - includes any gathering of the governing body at which action is
taken.
b. Action - Action means the transaction of the official business of the
governing body, including, but not limited to, receipt of public testimony,
deliberations, discussions, considerations, reviews, evaluations and formal
actions.
c. Governing Body means the multi-member board, commission, committee,
council, or other policy or rule-making body of a public agency, or any
committee thereof when the committee acts on behalf of the governing
body, conducts hearings, or takes testimony or public comment. This
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 159 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 2
definition covers city councils, planning commissions, library boards, and
park boards.
C. Executive Sessions (RCW 42.30.110). Relevant municipal examples:
1. Selection of a site or acquisition of real estate by lease or purchase when
public knowledge could cause likelihood of increased price.
2. To consider the minimum price at which real estate will be offered for sale or
lease when public knowledge would cause a likelihood of decreased price. Final
action of selling must be taken in an open meeting.
3. Review of negotiations of publicly bid contracts when public knowledge of
such negotiations would cause a likelihood of increased costs.
4. To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer
or employee. Note: The public officer or employee can also demand that the
matter be held in an open meeting.
5. To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment. The final
action of hiring, setting the salary or discharging or disciplining will be at an
open meeting.
6. To evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office,
although the final action of appointment must take place in an open meeting.
7. To discuss with legal counsel representing the agency the matters relating to
agency enforcement actions or to discuss with legal counsel litigation to which
the agency, the governing body or member acting in an official capacity is or is
likely to become a party when public knowledge regarding the discussion is
likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency.
NOTE: Before convening in an executive session, the presiding officer of the governing
body shall publicly announce the purpose for excluding the public from the
meeting place and the time when the executive session will be concluded. The
executive session may be extended to a stated later time by an announcement of
the presiding officer. RCW 42.30. 1 10. See also RCW 42.30.140 for matters
the Act does not apply to.
D. Expulsion of Meeting Participants.
May expel disruptive persons and may relocate the meeting, but may not exclude "non-
offending members of the media." (RCW 42.30.050)
E. Basic Requirements for Meetings.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 160 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 3
1. Date, time and place of regular meetings to be established by ordinance,
resolution. (RCW 42.30.070).
2. Special meetings - may be called by presiding officer or majority of members on
24 hours written notice to each council member. Must notify media with
requests for notice on file. Notice must state time, place and business to be
transacted. Cannot take final action on any item not on agenda. (RCW
42.30.080)
3. Adjourned/continued meetings - written notice required, including posting at
door. (RCW 42.30.090 and .100). Less than a quorum may adjourn. Process
also typically used for cancellation of meetings.
F. Penalties.
1. Under RCW 42.30.060(l) and (2) no ordinances, resolutions, rules, etc. shall be
adopted except in a meeting open to the public. Any action taken at meetings
failing to comply with this provision shall be null and void. No governing body
of a public agency at any meeting required to be open to the public shall vote by
secret ballot. Any vote taken in violation of this subsection shall be null and
void.
2. Civil fine for violations in an amount of $100. Person bringing enforcement suit
may be entitled to attorney's fees if prevails. RCW 42.30.120. However, if the
court finds the suit was frivolous, it may award attorney's fees to the city or
county.
G. Exemptions.
The Act does not apply to:
1. The proceedings concerned with the formal issuance of an order granting,
suspending, revoking or denying any license, permit or certificate to engage in
any business, occupation or profession or to any disciplinary proceedings
involving a member of such business, occupation or profession, or to receive a
license for a sports activity or to operate any mechanical device or motor vehicle
where a license or registration is necessary; or
2. That portion of a meeting of a quasi-judicial body which relates to a quasi-
judicial matter between named parties as distinguished from a matter having
general effect on the public or on a class or group; or
3. Matters governed by Chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure Act; or
4. Collective bargaining sessions with employee organizations, including contract
negotiations, grievance meetings, and discussions relating to the interpretation
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 161 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 4
or application of a labor agreement; or that portion of a meeting during which
the governing body is planning or adopting the strategy or position to be taken
by the governing body during the course of any collective bargaining,
professional negotiations, or grievance or mediation proceedings, or reviewing
the proposals made in the negotiations or proceedings while in progress. (RCW
42.30.130)
II. Appearance of Fairness Doctrine.
A. Origins
The Appearance of Fairness doctrine is a judicially based doctrine loosely based upon
procedural due process. It was first formulated by the state supreme court in 1969 in Smith v.
Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715, 739, 453 P.2d 832 (1969). Smith involved a controversial
rezone to enable the construction of an aluminum reduction plant on 470 waterfront acres of
Guimes Island. After years of study and public hearings, the area has been initially zoned
residential. After taking testimony from the public on the rezone, the planning commission
held a closed meeting exclusively with some project proponents. The proponents met with the
planning commission members for more than an hour, whereupon the commission
recommended that the Skagit County Board of Commissioners approve the rezone without
taking any further public comment. The Board of Commissioners then summarily approved the
rezone, also without taking public comment.
At the time of the rezone hearing, there was no law, including the Open Public Meetings Act,
that placed any restrictions on closed door meetings, ex parte contacts, or other matters related
to the appearance of fair decision making. Apparently (although not that clearly) basing its
authority on procedural due process, the Court made the first enunciation of the Appearance of
Fairness doctrine as follows:
It is axiomatic that, whenever the law requires a hearing of any sort as a condition
precedent to the power to proceed, it means a fair hearing, a hearing not only fair in
substance, but fair in appearance as well.
Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715, 739, 453 P.2d 832 (1969).
This generalization was later clarified, a little, in 1976 as follows:
Would a disinterested person, apprised of the totality of a member's personal
interest or involvement be reasonably justified in thinking that the involvement
might affect the member's judgment?
(Emphasis added.) Swift v. Island County, 87 Wn.2d 348, 361, 552 P.2d 175 (1976).
B. Limited to Quasi-Judicial Actions.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 162 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 5
Case law and chapter 42.36 RCW both limit the appearance of fairness doctrine to quasi-
judicial actions. Quasi-judicial actions are specified in RCW 42.36.010 as being "...those
actions of the legislative body, planning commission, hearing examiner, zoning adjuster, board
of adjustment, or boards which determine the legal rights, duties, or privileges of specific
parties in a hearing or other contested case proceeding."
Quasi-judicial actions do not include the legislative actions adopting, amending or revising
comprehensive, community or neighborhood plans or other land use planning documents or the
adoption of area-wide zoning ordinances or the adoption of a zoning amendment that is of area-
wide significance. RCW 42.36.010.
In other words, just about any development permit application involving a public hearing is
subject to the appearance of fairness doctrine. The exception for comprehensive plan
amendments is sometimes difficult to reconcile and for the public to understand. If a city or
county process a site-specific rezone along with a site-specific comprehensive plan
amendment, the rezone is considered to be quasi-judicial and the comprehensive plan
amendment is not. This leads to some interesting and often times confusing problems in public
testimony. Another problem in differentiating between quasi-judicial and legislative actions is
finding the dividing point between “site-specific” and “area-wide” rezones. Surprisingly, there
is no case law that clarifies this distinction, although the issue arises fairly often at the local
government level. It is usually simply prudent to take the conservative approach and treat
every permit application as quasi-judicial if there is any ambiguity, since there is rarely a legal
down side for doing so.
C. Ex Parte Contacts.
RCW 42.36.060 prohibits ex parte contacts during the pendency of a quasi-judicial hearing
with opponents or proponents unless the substance of the communication is placed on the
record and the public has the opportunity to rebut the substance. This is probably the most
disliked Appearance of Fairness requirement, at least from the perspective of local
constituencies and their elected representatives. Local citizens find it difficult to understand
why they are not allowed to consult with their elected representatives on controversial
development permit applications.
As discussed above, RCW 42.36.060 essentially allows for the “correction” of ex parte
violations by full disclosure, but it is not recommended that elected officials engage in a
practice of ex parte contacts in reliance on subsequent disclosure. Ex parte contacts are
dangerous because an official could forget to disclose the substance of a contact or could
express an opinion in the contact that would constitute prejudgment bias. Prejudgment bias
cannot be corrected by disclosure.
D. Waiver
RCW 42.36.080 requires that an individual raise an objection as soon as the individual is made
aware of a potential violation.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 163 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 6
The waiver requirement of RCW 42.36.080 has served as a powerful tool for cities and
counties to avoid Appearance of Fairness challenges. RCW 36.70C.060 requires petitioners
under the Land Use Petition Act (“LUPA”), Chapter 36.70C RCW, to exhaust their
administrative remedies prior to filing a LUPA action. The state supreme court has interpreted
this exhaustion requirement as requiring participation in the public hearing process. Citizens
for Mount Vernon v. Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 868-70 (1997). Consequently, cities and
counties will typically commence a public hearing by disclosing any possible Appearance of
Fairness violation. If no one objects, the city or county is most likely immunized from any
disclosed Appearance challenge. Those not in attendance will have no standing to challenge
the land use decision 1 , and those in attendance will have waived their right to later contest the
asserted Appearance violation.
E. Doctrine of Necessity
If disqualification results in the loss of a quorum, the entire decision making body may
participate, so long as each potential violation is disclosed.
F. Regular Business Exception. (RCW 42.36.020)
RCW 42.36.020 provides that no member of a local decision-making body may be disqualified
by the appearance of fairness doctrine for conducting the business of his or her office with any
constituent on any matter other than a quasi-judicial action then pending before the local
legislative body.
H. Campaign Statements and Contributions (42.36.040 and 42.36.050)
RCW 42.36.040 provides that prior to declaring as a candidate for public office or while
campaigning, no public discussion or opinion by a person subsequently elected to public office
on any pending or proposed quasi-judicial actions shall be a violation of the appearance of
fairness doctrine. RCW 42.36.050 provides that acceptance of campaign contributions doesn’t
violate the appearance of fairness doctrine.
These exceptions, as with all other Appearance exceptions, should be treated with caution. The
Appearance of Fairness doctrine, as its name expresses, applies to appearances of unfair
hearings. Hearings are also subject to an actual fairness requirement, arising from
constitutional due process requirements. See State ex. rel. Beam v. Fulwiler, 76 Wn.2d 313,
316 (1969). Consequently, campaign statements evidencing a bias impermeable to contrary
evidence could still lead to the invalidation of a land use decision as a violation of procedural
due process requierements.
I. Applications
1 One potential exception may be someone who has submitted written testimony but failed to attend the hearing.
This issue has not yet been addressed by any Washington appellate court.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 164 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 7
As previously mentioned, the vagaries of the Appearance of Fairness doctrine has resulted in
extensive litigation. The cases below serve as some examples.
1. Prejudgment
Bjarnson v. Kitsap County, 78 Wn. App. 840 (1995) – Challenge to Kitsap
County approval of rezone and planned unit development. One county
commissioner allegedly assured project applicants before they purchased the
project property that the project would be approved. The commissioner also
detailed the contents of the decision on the project months before it was issued.
Finally, the commissioner also promised a project opponent that he would delay
the project for five years. To remove the taint of the commissioner’s alleged
violation of the appearance of fairness, the Kitsap County Board of
Commissioners reheard the rezone and pud application without the participation
of the offending commissioner. The appeals court found that the rehearing of
the application corrected any of the alleged appearance of fairness violations
caused by the nonparticipating commissioner.
Anderson v. Island County, 81 Wn.2d. 312 (1972) - Rezone held invalid
because the chairman of the planning commission was the former owner of the
applicant's company, expressed views in favor of the application prior to the
conclusion of public testimony, and told an opposition member “that you are
just wasting your time talking.”
Chrobuck v. Snohomish County, 78 Wn.2d 858 (1971) - Prior to comprehensive
plan amendment and rezone hearings, the chairman of planning commission and
the chairman of board of county commissioners embarked in an all expenses
paid trip to view the applicant's facilities in California. An attorney member of
the planning commission assisted the applicant in the selection of local counsel.
Another member of the planning commission signed an advertisement
supporting the application and appeared as a witness on behalf of the applicant.
A combination of circumstances and cumulative impact cast an "aura of
improper influence, partiality and prejudgment".
Trepanier v. Everett, 64 Wn. App. 380 (1992) - Challenge to the City of Everett
zoning ordinance and SEPA DNS determination. Challenge was based upon the
appearance of fairness of the City reviewing its own actions. The court held that
absent a showing of bias, the Council's consideration of its own proposed code
does not violate the doctrine.
Belcher v. Kitsap County, 60 Wn. App. 949 (1991) Challenge to County
Commissioner for making motion to approve rezone of property in his district.
Appellant found that over the past 3.5 years, one of the commissioners always
made the motion for approval or denial of a land use project within his district.
Court found no violation.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 165 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 8
2. Business Relationships
Narrowsview Association v. Tacoma, 84 Wn.2d 416 (1974) Planning
Commission and Council adopted an ordinance rezoning an 89-acre tract. A
member of the Planning Commission was employed by the bank, which held a
security interest on the property. The rezone more than doubled the value of the
property. The Commission member was not an officer of the bank, not in a
policy making decision, not involved in the loan account and not aware that his
employer held the mortgage. Doctrine violated. Even though the bank
employee would not personally benefit from the rezone decision, the court
found an undeniable major benefit to his employer
Swift v. Island County, 87 Wn.2d 348 (1976) – Plat approval. Commissioner
was chairman of the board and stockholder of a bank having an interest in the
property. Doctrine violated even though the commissioner was no longer on the
bank board when the final vote was taken.
Fleming v. Tacoma, 81 Wn.2d 292 (1972), overruled on other grounds, Raynes
v. Leavenworth, 118 Wn.2d 237 (1992) - Less than 48 hours after final vote
approving rezone, member of the City Council acting as attorney for applicant
began incorporation process for the project. Doctrine violated.
3. Social/marital relationships
Fleck v. King County, 16 Wn. App. 668 (1977) - Husband and wife on same
board - reasonable person would question whether the reaction of one spouse on
an issue was fully independent of the action taken by the other. Appearance of
Fairness violated.
King County Water District v. Review Board, 87 Wn.2d 536 (1976) - Mere
acquaintance with, or casual business dealings in a minimal sense not violation.
4. Membership of organizations
Save v. Bothell, 89 Wn.2d 862 (1978) - Planning commission member was a
director of an organization which voted to support proposed rezone. Doctrine
violated.
5. Personal Benefit/Detriment
Buell v. Bremerton, 80 Wn.2d 518 (1972) - Rezone. Chairman of planning
commission owned property within a few hundred feet and was indirectly
benefited. Self-interest of one member infects the action of other members of
the Commission, even though matter would have passed without the chairman's
vote.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 166 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 9
Byers v. Board of Clallam County Commissioners, 84 Wn.2d 796, (1974) -
Interim zoning ordinance adopted by Board. Two members owned property in
the commission districts where zoning was occurring. Too remote (10 - 15
miles from the zoned areas) and no indication of direct or indirect benefit.
6. Ex parte Contacts
Chrobuck v. Snohomish County, 78 Wn.2d 858 (1971) - All expense paid trip to
view applicant's similar facilities violation.
West Main Associates v. Bellevue, 49 Wn. App. 513 (1987) Councilmember
attended meeting of a community organization opposed to development two
weeks prior to administrative decision. Matter was not pending before the
legislative body at the time of the alleged contacts, therefore no violation.
OPAL v. Adams County, 128 Wn.2d 869 (1996) – Prior to the approval of a
county permit for a regional landfill, records established that one of the County
Commissioners had received 63 long distance phone calls from the permit
applicant at his home. During this same period of time, the county
commissioners were also adopting a solid waste management plan. At the
hearing on the landfill permit application, the commissioner that had engaged in
the long distance phone calls disclosed that he had engaged in a few phone
conversations with people on the application. No one objected to the disclosure
when it was made. The same Commissioner also had a couple of phone
conversations with the applicant after he made his disclosure. The court found
no appearance violation. The litigant failed to establish that subject matter of
the 63 phone calls pertained to the landfill permit as opposed to the solid waste
management plan, the latter not quasi-judicial and not subject to the appearance
doctrine. Conversations made after disclosure didn’t violate the appearance
doctrine because the subject matter of the phone calls had been discussed during
the hearing.
King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board, 91
Wn. App. 1 (1998). Organization opposed to King County approval of 812-lot
subdivision filed a court action that in part sought to void the approval on
alleged inadequate disclosure of ex parte contacts. The organization did object
several times to the King County Council on alleged lack of full disclosure of ex
parte contacts by the councilmembers. At one meeting, an organization
representative agreed with a councilmember that the representative was not
seeking recusal of councilmembers who allegedly failed to make full disclosure
of the contacts. The appeals court found the representative’s agreement to serve
as a waiver of the ex parte appearance challenges.
J. Effect of violation.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 167 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 10
A land use decision in violation of the Appearance of Fairness doctrine is subject to
invalidation, if the violation is not harmless. See RCW 36.70C.130(1)(a); RCW 36.70C.140.
The State Supreme Court has held that damages are not available for an Appearance violation.
See Algier v. Mukilteo, 107 Wn.2d 541, 547, 730 P.2d 1333 (1987). However, the Court did
not specifically address the applicability of RCW 64.40.020(a), which provides as follows:
Owners of a property interest who have filed an application for a permit have an
action for damages to obtain relief from acts of an agency which are arbitrary,
capricious, unlawful, or exceed lawful authority, or relief from a failure to act
within time limits established by law: PROVIDED, That the action is unlawful
or in excess of lawful authority only if the final decision of the agency was made
with knowledge of its unlawfulness or that it was in excess of lawful authority,
or it should reasonably have been known to have been unlawful or in excess of
lawful authority.
K. What to do if a violation exists?
1 Step down;
2. Do not participate and leave room; and
3. If discover part way through proceedings, go back and start over.
III. Conduct of Hearings.
A. Must be fair in fact - notice and opportunity to be heard.
B. Must appear fair.
C. Procedures.
1. Must have ability to produce a verbatim transcript.
The requirement for a verbatim transcript for rezones has been ruled to arise in
part from requirements that courts limit their review to the administrative
record. See Capitol Neighborhood Assn. v. Olympia, 23 Wn. App. 260, 595
P.2d 58 (1979).
2. Assign a number or letter to each exhibit and refer to those numbers or letters
thereafter.
3. Have each speaker identify himself/herself.
4. Have the Chairman recognize each speaker so you know who is speaking.
5. Be sure to have each speaker speak into the microphone.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 168 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 11
6. Do not verbally step on each other; no side bar conversations; do not rattle
papers by the microphone.
7. Be sure to have the Clerk or Secretary monitor that the machine is recording.
8. You may impose reasonable time limits.
9. You may encourage speakers not to be repetitive.
10. In imposing time limits, be aware of potential unfairness if multiple speakers
request time on one side of the issue.
D. Suggested order of presentation.
1. Inquiry by Chairman if any committee members have any conflict of interest or
appearance of fairness problems.
2. Challenges from the audience on the basis of appearance of fairness.
3. May ask legal counsel to review criteria.
4. Open hearing.
5. Staff presentation and Commission questions.
6. Applicant presentation and Commission questions.
7. Speakers who have signed up indicating a desire to speak.
8. Persons in the audience who have not signed up to speak, but desire to speak.
9. Applicant's response/rebuttal.
10. Staff's response/rebuttal.
11. Close hearing.
E. Deliberation.
1. Discussion - why supporting approval or disapproval.
2. Base reasons on criteria and ordinances or State law.
3. Point out how proposal does or does not meet criteria. Base reasons on written
and oral record.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 169 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 12
4. Motion to approve or disapprove should instruct the staff to prepare draft
findings and conclusions in line with the discussion to be presented at the next
regular meeting for final approval and passage by the Board.
IV. Decision
A. Must be in writing.
B. Must Address Review Criteria.
C. Must be based on evidence deduced from the record.
V. Regulatorv Reform
A. Purpose.
Provide for efficient, nonduplicative processing of land use permits while providing a
meaningful opportunity for public participation.
B. Applicability
1. Applies to "Project Permit Applications", defined by RCW 36.70B.020 as any
land use or environmental permit or license required by local government for a
project action, including but not limited to building permits, subdivisions,
binding site plans, planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline
substantial development permits, etc. Includes site-specific rezones but doesn't
include comprehensive plan amendments or amendment of development
regulations.
2. RCW 36.70B.140 permits local jurisdictions to exempt by ordinance or
resolution certain types of project permit applications from specified regulatory
reform requirements. The exemptions are generally authorized for permits in
which the local jurisdiction has determined present special circumstances that
warrant a different review process or permits that are exempt from
environmental review. One significant regulatory reform provision that cannot
be waived is the one open public hearing/one closed record appeal per permit
requirement.
C. Review Process
1. Preapplication conference not required, but recommended.
2. Preapplication Decisions.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 170 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 13
a. Consolidated or separate permit applications?
RCW 36.70B.120 provides the applicant the option of consolidated
review, where all permits for one project are subject to a total of one
public hearing and one closed record appeal.
b. Joint hearings with other jurisdictions?
RCW 36.70B.110(7) gives the applicant the option of having its hearing
combined with the land use hearing of another jurisdiction if the hearing
can be held in the local jurisdiction and the hearing can be held within
the time limits required by the Regulatory Reform Act.
3. Determination of Completeness
a. RCW 36.70B.070 requires a city to issue notice to an applicant within 28
days of application on whether an application is complete.
b. RCW 36.70B.070(2) provides that an application is complete when it
meets the procedural submission requirements of local government and
is sufficient for continued processing. Additional information may still
be subsequently required. The primary procedural impact of a
determination of completeness is that the deadlines for project decision
making commence accruing.
c. An application is deemed complete if no notice is issued by the local
jurisdiction within 28 days of application.
d. If the local jurisdiction finds that the application is incomplete, it so
notifies the applicant and identifies what is necessary for a complete
application. Upon the resubmission of the application the local
jurisdiction is then given 14 days to determine if the application is
complete.
4. Notice of Application
a. RCW 36.70B.110 requires that a notice of application must be issued
within 14 days of the issuance of a notice of completeness.
b. The notice of application must be sent to the public and other agencies
with jurisdiction. Local jurisdictions are given some flexibility as to
how the notice of application is distributed -- can vary depending on
type of permit application. Subdivisions, PUD's and conditional use
permits typically involve mailed notice to property owners within 300
feet of the project.
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
Packet Page 171 of 179
Short Course on Planning - 14
{PAO498902.DOC;1/99925.022222/900000}
c. The notice of application must include a project description, contain the
public hearing date, if any, identify other permits related to the project,
identify existing environmental documents related to the project and
provide for a 14-30 day public comment period. No decision or
recommendation on the project, other than a SEPA threshold
determination, may be issued during this comment period.
5. One Public Hearing
a. RCW 36.70B.050 only permits one open public hearing and one closed
record appeal per project permit application.
b. No restrictions on public meetings. RCW 36.70B.020(5) defines a
public meeting as an informal meeting, hearing, workshop, or other
public gathering of people to obtain comments from the public or other
agencies on a proposed project permit prior to the local government's
decision.
6. Notice of Decision
RCW 36.70B.080 requires that a Notice of Final Decision be issued within 120
days of the issuance of a Notice of Application, unless the local government
makes written findings that a specified amount of additional time is needed for
processing of specific complete project permit applications or permit types.
7. Appeal
a. RCW 36.70B.110(9) provides that local jurisdictions do not have to
provide for an administrative appeal, but if one is provided it must be
filed within 14 days of a Notice of Decision or other notice that the
decision has been made.
b. An appeal generally must be based on a closed record -- no new
evidence is permitted. RCW 36.70B.020(3) provides that an open record
hearing can be held on an appeal if no open record hearing was held on
the project permit application prior to a final decision.
Packet Page 172 of 179
AM-2811 7.
Report on City Council Committee Meetings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:02/16/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:10 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of February 9, 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached are copies of the meeting minutes for the following City Council Committees that met on
February 9, 2010:
•Community Services/Development Services Committee
•Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: CS/DS 2-9-10 Committee Minutes
Link: 2-9-10 Finance Committee Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/12/2010 12:12 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/12/2010 01:16 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Linda Hynd 02/12/2010 01:28 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 02/10/2010 02:10
PM
Final Approval Date: 02/12/2010
Packet Page 173 of 179
D R A F T M I N U T E S
Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting
February 9, 2010
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Council Member Strom Peterson, Chair Rob English, City Engineer
Council Member Dave Orvis Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Council Member Adrienne Fraley-Monillas,
Guest
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Engineering
Program Manager
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Bio Park, City Attorney
The committee convened at 6:00 p.m.
A. Continued discussion on regulations concerning bikini barista stands.
City Attorney Bio Park presented his research on this item. Bio noted that the City is limited in
regulating dress code issues, and has much more latitude in regulating behavior. This is the
approach reflected in current City code, especially ECC 5.38 which regulates ‘public morals’ by
taking a broad view from the standpoint of “public exposure.” Everett’s code was more narrowly
drafted, and their code amendments were intended to broaden their provisions and to address
ambiguities that hampered their ability to deal with the new areas of concern regarding some of the
alleged behavior that was occurring. Edmonds’ code provisions already appear to cover what
Everett was attempting to address, although it might be a good idea to review the City’s code and
make any updates that are needed. Snohomish County’s approach appears to be creating a ‘new’
category of regulation in between the traditional distinction between ‘adult’ and non-adult behavior.
Bio advised that this was new and ‘untried’ territory, and could be costly if it results in a new area of
litigation.
ACTION: Recommended forwarding two options to the full Council for consideration. One option
would be to simply review and make any minor adjustments to the Edmonds code provisions
needed at this point in time; the second option would be to pursue the Snohomish County approach
toward tighter regulation and licensing of a wider range of dress or behavior.
B. Discussion regarding changes to City Code 5.05.060, Dogs on Public Grounds.
Brian McIntosh presented this recommendation brought forward due to citizen requests and the
development of the new park sites at Hickman Park and the162nd St. site. Currently there are 7 on-
leash parks and one off-leash park where dogs are permitted. Staff recommends that the current
code be amended to designate three additional parks to permit on-leash dogs:
1. Sunset Overlook Park – this is the grassy strip west of Sunset Avenue. Citizens have
requested this in the past to allow people to walk and enjoy the view from the memorial
benches along this path.
2. Hickman Park – during the public input phase prior to park construction testimony indicated
strong interest in allowing dogs on-leash along the 3,500 feet of pathways. This is consistent
with other City parks with designated pathways.
3. New Park at 162nd St. SW – This park will have a small interior trail and will be particularly
attractive as a rest stop and viewing opportunity for people walking in the neighborhood now
connected by the new 76th Ave W / 75th Pl W walkway and on to Meadowdale Beach Park.
Packet Page 174 of 179
CS/DS Committee Minutes
April 14, 2009
Page 2
Also discussed was the suggestion allowing dogs on-leash at Brackett’s Landing North and South.
Mr. McIntosh indicated that dogs are now allowed on City sidewalks adjacent to the waterfront parks
but not on the park walkways. The waterfront walkways are busy and popular with all ages but
mixing dogs on-leash and walkers in these parks has created difficulties in the past. An attached
memo outlined these concerns. Staff recommends not dropping the restrictions at the waterfront
parks.
ACTION: As this will be a code change, it was recommended that this topic be scheduled for a
public hearing at an upcoming City Council meeting.
C. What can be made available to Council on appeal?
Councilmember Orvis noted that the Council’s January interim ordinance essentially took care of this
issue. It was also noted by staff the any issues regarding PRD appeals and approvals would likely
become “moot” if PRD’s are dropped from the code in favor of integrating improved design and
sustainability (e.g. LID) standards into the subdivision regulations. This will be developed further as
part of the subdivision code re-write pending at the Planning Board.
ACTION: No action required at this time.
D. Request from Historic Preservation Commission for waiver of certain fees related to
historic structures.
Rob Chave summarized the proposal from the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to
exempt properties on the historic register from needing to pay a fee for a pre-application meeting.
Historic properties would benefit from this process by highlighting issues before applying for permits
and approvals, and the fee can be a dis-incentive to asking for the pre-application meeting. The
Commission felt it could be one more positive incentive for a property getting listed on the historic
register. Rob noted that only one property has even been interested in the pre-application process,
so the budgetary impact is likely to be very small. Councilmember Peterson noted that if the
exemption is abused, Council could always change its decision in the future.
ACTION: Recommend bringing a resolution to the full Council for approval to exempt properties
listed on the historic register from the requirement to pay a fee for a pre-application meeting.
E. Proposed Title 18 Code amendments to allow use of City right of way for bistro and
outdoor dining and placement of art in City right of way.
Rob English provided a redlined version of the proposed amendments to Title 18 for Bistro and
Outdoor Dining and placement of art in City right of way. The proposed amendments will provide
more specific guidelines on how the City’s right of way can be used for outdoor dining. The code
changes covering the placement of art in the City right of way were also discussed and Francis
Chapin was present to answer questions. Councilmember Orvis asked about the appeal language
on page 10 and staff informed him that this language was added based on the Title 18 changes the
City Attorney presented to the City Council on February 2, 2010. Councilmember Peterson asked if
a flat fee could be implemented for use of the right of way rather than a monthly fee. Discussion
followed regarding how a monthly fee could be collected and how it would address seasonal uses.
The proposed right of way use fee is the same charge being applied to a vendor using city right of
way adjacent to the ferry holding lanes on SR104. Councilmember Peterson asked why an 11pm
deadline for removing temporary objects that extend beyond 24-inches of the building. Staff
explained that 11pm was chosen to reduce the potential for noise related complaints. Keeping
temporary objects within 24-inches of the building frontage also reduces the possibility of tripping
2
Packet Page 175 of 179
CS/DS Committee Minutes
April 14, 2009
Page 3
hazards where low street lighting levels exist. The Committee also discussed if more guidance
was needed in regards to the type and look of barriers. Staff determined that there were many
options for barrier types and that it would be difficult to establish and administer specific guidelines.
ACTION: Recommend presenting the amendments to the full Council with a public hearing.
F. Proposed policies for Stormwater Comprehensive Plan update.
Jerry Shuster presented the information in the agenda memo.
Councilmember Orvis asked how this plan is different from the revision to the stormwater code
currently underway. Jerry explained that the revised code is to regulate stormwater runoff from
development, redevelopment, and construction sites in order for the City to comply with the state-
issued municipal stormwater permit. This is one component of the overall stormwater program. The
revised comprehensive plan will include other aspects of the City's stormwater management
program including operation and maintenance of City stormwater facilities, programmatic efforts to
comply with the various other regulatory drivers, capital projects to address flooding, water quality,
and habitat issues, as well as an stormwater utility rate structure to pay for it all. Ideally, the
comprehensive plan should be done first, but the City is under a deadline imposed by the State
permit to revise the code so it has to done first. The comprehensive plan will reflect the need to have
the development-related stormwater code in line with state permit requirements.
Councilmember Peterson stated that at the Council retreat he has been designated as the lead
Councilmember for all stormwater issues and is looking forward to working with Jerry and other staff
on these issues.
Jerry mentioned that representatives of the Edmonds Backyard wildlife group had expressed
interested in being involves in the formation of the comprehensive stormwater plan.
Councilmember Peterson said he would notify that group and other environmental groups in the city
during the next CS/DS meeting so they can be involved. Jerry will contact Councilmember Peterson
work further on the goals and polices.
ACTION: No action required at this time.
G. Continued discussion regarding the removal of colored street markings used locating
utilities.
The item was introduced by Noel Miller, Public Works Director. Based on the difficulty to effectively
remove the locate paint markings and the additional cost in staff time required to monitor contractors
for compliance, the committee recommended that this proposal to require contractors and the City to
remove colored street markings from the public right of way be discontinued for any further
consideration by the City Council.
ACTION: No further action to be taken on this item.
H. Discussion on PRD setbacks.
Staff advised that this issue may become “moot” if PRD’s are dropped from the code in favor of
including more design and flexible development standards in the subdivision code. The Committee
agreed that that would be the appropriate time to look at perimeter standards, as well.
ACTION: No action required at this time.
3
Packet Page 176 of 179
CS/DS Committee Minutes
April 14, 2009
Page 4
4
I. Discussion on Conditional Use Permits for home occupations.
Rob Chave indicated that this was a topic that needed to be revisited, as certain assumptions on
impacts and the need for referral to a Hearing Examiner for a public hearing may not be appropriate
in all cases currently described in the code – particularly with the city’s expressed goals of
encouraging home-based working opportunities. Rather than forwarding this to the Planning Board,
the Committee agreed that it would like to develop ideas before forwarding any specific direction to
the Planning Board for review.
ACTION: Schedule further work session(s) on this topic at the Committee level.
The Committee meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Packet Page 177 of 179
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
February 9, 2010
6:00 PM
L:\PRODUCTIONDB\AGENDA\CCOUNCIL\0032_2811_2-09-10 MINUTES.DOC
Present: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Councilmember Plunkett
Councilmember Buckshnis
Staff: Lorenzo Hines Jr., Director, Finance and Information Services
Noel Miller, Director, Public Works Department
Public: Darrol Haug
Roger Hertrich
Councilmember Plunkett called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
A. Alderwood Water Supply contract final review
Noel Miller, Director, Public Works Department briefed the committee on the contract.
Committee members requested an additional briefing during the January 2010 Finance
Committee meeting. Councilman Plunkett inquired about the difference in the wholesale
and retail rates and Mr. Miller responded with an explanation of the rates and the rational
for them. Recommendation: Full Council review when the contract is ready for signature.
B. Wireless internet rollout in Council Chambers
Lorenzo Hines, Director, Finance and Information Services in response to inquiries made
by Councilmember’s Bernheim and Wilson, briefed the committee on the steps necessary
to provide wireless internet access to members of the Council while Council is in session.
Director Hines indicated that implementation will follow the following course: physical
infrastructure improvements to the Council chamber, on-going citywide information
network improvement, installation of the wireless hub, and procedural and legal training
for Council members regarding internet and email usage during Council meetings.
Director Hines indicated that the wireless implementation will tentatively begin during
mid-March 2010. For information only, no further action required.
C. Funding proposal for the Building Maintenance Fund 116
Noel Miller, Director, Public Works Department requested that $300,000 of the net cash
received from the Fire District 1 contract be used to address various capital projects
geared to repair (structural, facade, weather proofing, HVAC) city buildings.
Recommendation: Move to Council for discussion.
D. Discussion and review of long-term difference between presentation in
relation to the Fire District 1 contract in November of 2009 and finance update
of January 25, 2010
Lorenzo Hines, Director, Finance and Information Services provided the committee with
an overview of the differences between the October 16, 2009 (Option 4) budget forecast
and the January 25, 2010 budget forecast. Director Hines indicated that the differences
Packet Page 178 of 179
Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
between the two reports lie in the fact that the revenue trends for the latest report have
been reduced due to the current economic climate. Director Hines further explained that
these forecasts, like all other forecasts, are a point in time estimate based on available
data. Councilman Plunkett expressed disappointment that the October 16, 2009 was not
more current. Director Hines indicated that the figures were the best information
available at that time. For information only, no further action required.
Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 6:47 PM.
Packet Page 179 of 179