2011.04.26 Transportation Benefit District Board A
AGENDA
CITY OF EDMONDS
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT BOARD
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
APRIL 26, 2011
6:30 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1.Approval of Agenda
2.Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B. AM-3897 Approval of Transportation Benefit District Board Meeting Minutes of August 3, 2010.
3. (10 Minutes)
AM-3902
Election of Transportation Benefit District Board President, Vice President and Treasurer for 2011.
4. (15 Minutes)
AM-3899
Edmonds Transportation Benefit District - Annual Report for Year 2010.
5.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)
6. (15 Minutes) Board Comments
ADJOURN
Packet Page 1 of 23
AM-3897 Item #: 2. B.
Transportation Benefit District Board
Date: 04/26/2011
Time:
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of Transportation Benefit District Board Meeting Minutes of August 3, 2010.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous TBD Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Attachments
08-03-10 Draft TBD Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Mike Cooper 04/21/2011 11:25 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/21/2011 04:38 PM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 04/21/2011 09:21 AM
Final Approval Date: 04/21/2011
Packet Page 2 of 23
Edmonds TBD Board Draft Minutes
August 3, 2010
Page 1
CITY OF EDMONDS
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT BOARD
DRAFT MINUTES
August 3, 2010
The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District meeting was called to order at 9:46 p.m. by Board President
Steve Bernheim in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
OFFICIALS PRESENT
Steve Bernheim, Board President
Strom Peterson, Board Vice President
D. J. Wilson, Board Member
Michael Plunkett, Board Member
Lora Petso, Board Member
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Board Member
Diane Buckshnis, Board Member
STAFF PRESENT
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Engineer
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
BOARD PRESIDENT PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
BOARD MEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
MINUTES OF JULY 13, 2010
C. APPROVAL OF TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
MINUTES OF JULY 20, 2010
3. CONSIDERATION, PUBLIC COMMENT, AND ACTION ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE OF
THE EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (ETBD) TO ADOPT BALLOT
TITLE LANGUAGE AND INSTRUCT THE CITY CLERK TO NOTIFY THE COUNTY
AUDITOR AND TAKE ALL OTHER NECESSARY STEPS TO PLACE BEFORE VOTERS
WITHIN THE ETBD, ON THE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT IN NOVEMBER, AN
OPPORTUNITY TO APPROVE OR REJECT A $40 INCREASE IN THE LOCAL USER FEE
FOR TRANSPORTATION TO BE USED TO PURSUE A SPECIFIC LIST OF 37
TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS.
Packet Page 3 of 23
Edmonds TBD Board Draft Minutes
August 3, 2010
Page 2
Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the Edmonds City Council passed an ordinance tonight to
expand the authorities of the ETBD to include the ability to seek voter approval on an increase in the local
user fee for transportation. Staff recommends the ETBD Board approve an ordinance to adopt ballot title
language and instruct the City Clerk to notify the County Auditor and take other necessary steps to place
before the voters in the ETBD an opportunity to approve or reject the $40 increase.
Board President Bernheim opened the public participation opportunity for this item.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, recommended the ballot language describe the user fee, the projects it would
fund, why a voter should support the measure, and the amount of money needed to upgrade and create
new roads.
Hearing no further comment, Board President Bernheim closed public comment.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the proposition includes the ballot title, the voters pamphlet
explanatory statement and information incorporated by reference in those documents. The ballot title is
limited to 75 words and must be neutral in nature. One of the challenges is complying with the
requirement of the TBD legislation that the proposition describe the specific projects the monies will
fund. The State Supreme Court has provided some guidance in Sane v. Sound Transit in which they noted
the proposition includes the ballot title; the voters pamphlet information, an additional 200 words; and the
documents that are referenced in the voters pamphlet. That is the reason for the whereas in the ordinance
as well as the provision in Section 1 that reserve to the Board the discretion to move projects around,
respond to emergencies, respond to cost overruns, use bonds and adjust to other priorities and receipt of
grant funds. The City is limited in what it can say in each element of the proposition and an informed
voter needs to go from the ballot title to the voters pamphlet. The City is prohibited from using public
funds to promote this ballot measure. The Council is seeking voter assistance with the pro and con
committees. He summarized it was hoped with all those resources, it would be possible to accomplish
what Mr. Rutledge asked.
Board President Bernheim asked whether the list would be included in the voters pamphlet. Mr. Snyder
answered the voters pamphlet was limited to a 200 word description. Board President Bernheim asked
how voters could obtain the project list. Mr. Snyder answered the Board and Council could provide
neutral information. The information to be included in the voters pamphlet refers voters to the City’s
website. He read from the explanatory statement, a detailed list of the improvements, their cost and
priorities are contained in TBD Ordinance No. 2 and are available upon request from the Edmonds City
Clerk and are posted on the City’s web site.
Board President Bernheim asked about the procedures for selecting and appointing pro and con
committees and having statements prepared. Mr. Snyder answered the process was at the Council’s
discretion, there was no process established by statute.
Board Vice President Peterson asked whether the City’s website address could be included in the voters
pamphlet explanatory statement without impacting the word count. He recalled candidates’ profiles did
not include certain information in the word count such as name, website, etc. Community
Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton answered there was likely enough space for
the website, noting because there were no spaces in the website address, it would count as only one word.
Board Member Petso referred to Mr. Snyder’s comment that the specific projects must be identified,
inquiring how a project defined as overlays met that requirement. Mr. Williams explained it is staff’s
intent via the overlay project on the list to fund ongoing overlay projects with the proceeds of the
additional fee as well as construct a list of specifically described transportation improvements. He
Packet Page 4 of 23
Edmonds TBD Board Draft Minutes
August 3, 2010
Page 3
anticipated the overlays were described sufficiently such as via the Pavement Condition Rating Index.
The actual list of street segments to be overlaid will depend on other works to be performed in the City
such as utility work, private development, etc. He summarized it would be difficult to identify the specific
street segments to be overlaid or the order in which they would be done.
Board President Bernheim declared a brief recess at Mr. Snyder’s request.
Mr. Snyder explained the statute requires a specific description of projects to be funded within the
proposition. As a result of Sane v. Sound Transit, the proposition includes the ballot title, the voters
pamphlet explanatory statement and information incorporated by reference in those documents. To add
specificity, staff suggests adding the following language as a footnote to Project 1 on the project list, “in
accord with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element, and Transportation Improvement
Plan” to provide the necessary detail.
Board Vice President Peterson suggested the City’s website contain a link directly to the project list.
Board Member Wilson advised he would oppose the proposed ordinance for the reasons he outlined
during the August 3 City Council meeting.
Board Member Buckshnis asked who developed the pro and con statements. Board President Bernheim
explained the City Council appoints the pro and con committees. City Clerk Sandy Chase advised Board
Members were allowed to serve on a pro or con committee. Board President Bernheim advised the forms
identifying the members of the committees are due by August 10. The first statement from each
committee is due by August 24 and August 27 is the due date for rebuttal.
Board Member Wilson suggested either, 1) giving Board President Bernheim the authority to name
members of the committees, or 2) he would volunteer to chair the con committee and anyone interested in
participating could contact him and someone else could chair the pro committee. Board President
Bernheim encouraged Board Members and/or voters interested in participating in either committee to
email him and by August 10 he would notify the Council of the names selected to serve on the
committees. Ms. Chase requested the names be provided to her in time to submit them to the Auditor.
That process was acceptable to the Board.
BOARD MEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE NO. 2 WITH THE SUGGESTED CHANGE TO
THE PRIORITY LIST. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), BOARD MEMBERS
PETERSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS, AND BUCKSHNIS AND BOARD PRESIDENT BERNHEIM
VOTING YES; AND BOARD MEMBERS PETSO, WILSON AND PLUNKETT VOTING NO.
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented only three voters can participate on the pro committee and three
voters can serve on the con committee. He recommended information on the City’s website be neutral and
that the Board establish a process for selecting the members of the pro and con committees. He said
Councilmembers and City employees could not serve on the pro or con committees. Ms. Chase advised
Councilmembers were eligible to participate on the pro and con committees. Board President Bernheim
assured any documents on the City’s website regarding the proposition would be information only and not
advocacy.
5. BOARD COMMENTS – NONE
Packet Page 5 of 23
Edmonds TBD Board Draft Minutes
August 3, 2010
Page 4
6. ADJOURN
With no further business, the TBD Board meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Packet Page 6 of 23
AM-3902 Item #: 3.
Transportation Benefit District Board
Date: 04/26/2011
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted For:Board President Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Election of Transportation Benefit District Board President, Vice President and Treasurer for 2011.
Recommendation
N/A
Previous TBD Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the Transportation Benefit District Bylaws that discusses the duties of the positions of President, Vice
President and Treasurer.
Attachments
TBD Bylaws
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Mike Cooper 04/22/2011 09:48 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/22/2011 10:07 AM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 04/21/2011 05:52 PM
Final Approval Date: 04/22/2011
Packet Page 7 of 23
Packet Page 8 of 23
Packet Page 9 of 23
Packet Page 10 of 23
Packet Page 11 of 23
AM-3899 Item #: 4.
Transportation Benefit District Board
Date: 04/26/2011
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted By:Phil Williams
Department:Public Works
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Edmonds Transportation Benefit District - Annual Report for Year 2010.
Recommendation
Accept Report
Previous TBD Action
October 21, 2008 - The Edmonds City Council approved Resolution 1181 setting a public hearing on November 18, 2008
regarding the potential establishment of a Transportation Benefit District (TBD).
November 3, 2008 – The Edmonds City Council conducted a first reading of Ordinance 3707 amending the Edmonds City
Code to enact a new Chapter 3.65, Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (TBD), establishing a TBD, specifying the
boundaries for the TBD, and specifying the TBD’s purpose to maintain, preserve, construct and reconstruct existing street
transportation infrastructure and other City street improvements.
November 18, 2008 - The Edmonds City Council conducted a public hearing on City of Edmonds, Washington Ordinance
3707 amending the Edmonds City Code to enact a new Chapter 3.65, Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (TBD),
establishing a TBD, specifying the boundaries for the TBD, specifying the maintenance and preservation of existing
transportation improvements, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. Following public comments and
deliberation, the Edmonds City Council approved Ordinance 3707. The governing board of the Transportation Benefit District
is the Edmonds City Council acting in an ex officio and independent capacity per RCW 36.73.020(3).
NOTE: The boundary of the Transportation Benefit District is coextensive with the boundary of the City of Edmonds.
February 3, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board conducted its first public meeting during which it
adopted the City of Edmonds TBD Charter and Bylaws.
NOTE: A charter is a document incorporating an institution and specifying its rights while bylaws are essentially rules made
by a local authority to regulate its own affairs.
February 17, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit Board adopted Ordinance 1 authorizing an annual $20 vehicle
license fee, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective.
February 17, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District reviewed and discussed a draft Interlocal Agreement
between the City of Edmonds, Washington, and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (TBD). See June 2, 2009 for
additional information.
June 2, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved an Interlocal Agreement (first reviewed on February
17, 2009) between the City of Edmonds, Washington, and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. The agreement serves
to help coordinate efforts to pursue individual, joint and mutual rights and obligations to maintain and preserve streets and
related transportation infrastructure within the City of Edmonds. Sections 1 and 2 of the Agreement define the obligations of
the Edmonds TBD and undertakings of the City. The Agreement also contains sections related to ownership, indemnification,
termination, and effective date of the Agreement
June 2, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved Appendix 79-09 to Interlocal Agreement Creating
Washington Cities Insurance Authority. The interlocal contains an indemnity from the city to the TBD for liability arising
from the services provided by city employees and that liability is covered by the city's underlying pool agreement.
June 2, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved an Interlocal Agreement between the Washington State
Department of Licensing (DOL) and Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. The Interlocal Agreement provides terms and
Packet Page 12 of 23
Department of Licensing (DOL) and Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. The Interlocal Agreement provides terms and
conditions under which the Washington State Department of Licensing shall administer and collect fees, on behalf of the
Edmonds Transportation Benefit District, as provided by contract according to RCW 82.80.140, RCW 36.73.065, RCW 46.12,
WAC 308-10, Chapter 18 USC Sec. 2721 -2725 Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and Executive Order 97-01, as
currently written or hereafter amended, and according to the Vehicle/Vessel Disclosure Agreement Application submitted by
the TBD.
June 23, 2009 – The Edmonds City Council approved an Interlocal Agreement between the City of Edmonds, Washington,
and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. This is the same agreement approved by the Edmonds TBD Board on June
2, 2009. The agreement serves to help coordinate efforts to pursue individual, joint and mutual rights and obligations to
maintain and preserve streets and related transportation infrastructure within the City of Edmonds. Sections 1 and 2 of the
Agreement define the obligations of the Edmonds TBD and undertakings of the City. The Agreement also contains sections
related to ownership, indemnification, termination, and effective date of the Agreement.
March 23, 2010 – The Transportation Benefit District Board conducted a meeting at which the following items and actions
were discussed and taken:
•Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board selected officers of the Transportation Benefit District.
•City staff also presented the Annual Transportation Benefit District Report for year 2009.
•Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board reviewed transportation capital funding options.
May 4, 2010 – The Transportation Benefit District Board conducted a meeting at which the following items were discussed:
•City staff provided an update regarding a list of project priorities which served as scenarios in assisting the TBD Board in
understanding the different TBD projects and funding options.
•The Transportation Benefit District Board discussed a public vote on possible TBD assessments in excess of the currently
collected $20 TBD vehicle license fee. No action taken on this item.
•The Transportation Benefit District Board discussed the possibility of participating in a Countywide TBD effort. No action
was taken on this item.
•The Transportation Benefit District Board appointed the City’s Finance Director as Board Treasurer and Washington Cities
Insurance Authority representative.
June 22, 2010 – The Transportation Benefit District Board conducted a meeting at which the following item was discussed:
•The Transportation Benefit District Board discussed placing a TBD transportation package on the November, 2010 ballot.
Possible TBD assessments in excess of the currently collected $20 TBD fee, and a list of potential transportation projects,
were also discussed. No action taken on this item.
July 13, 2010 – The Transportation Benefit District Board conducted a meeting at which the following item was discussed:
•The Transportation Benefit District Board continued its discussion about placing a TBD transportation package on the
November, 2010 ballot. Possible TBD assessments in excess of the currently collected $20 TBD fee, and a list of potential
transportation projects, were also discussed. No action was taken on this item.
July 20, 2010 – The Transportation Benefit District Board approved placing a measure on the November, 2010 ballot that
would increase the Transportation Benefit District vehicle license fee by an additional $40 to pay for various transportation and
walkway projects (see project list).
August 3, 2010 - The Transportation Benefit District Board approved Ordinance #2 which expanded the authority of the
ETBD to allow placing of an item on the November ballot for consideration of all Edmonds voters that would increase the
existing $20/vehicle local license fee to $60/vehicle and to use the additional revenue, if approved by the voters, to pursue a
list of 37 transportation capital projects.
Narrative
RCW 36.73.160 requires each established Transportation Benefit District to issue an annual report which details the District's
revenues and expenditures for the year and discusses project schedules for on-going projects.
The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (ETBD) met on five separate dates in 2010. These meetings culminated in a
proposed ballot measure that was submitted to Edmonds voters in November, 2010. The proposal was to raise the existing TBD
local license fee from $20/vehicle to $60/vehicle to pursue a list of 37 transportation capital projects, including maintenance
overlays. This item did not receive voter approval during the general election.
Packet Page 13 of 23
The ETBD raised a total of $589,545 from the existing $20/vehicle local license fee during 2010 (Attachment #1). Qualifying
expenses of the TBD, as limited by ETBD Ordinance #1 (See attachment 3), were $670,147. Since qualifying expenses
exceeded available revenues there was no ending fund balance for the ETBD.
Attachments
2010 ETBD Statement of Revenues and Expenses
ETBD 2010 Financial Backup
ETBD Allowable Charge Codes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 04/22/2011 11:59 AM
Mayor Mike Cooper 04/22/2011 12:05 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 04/22/2011 12:06 PM
Form Started By: Phil Williams Started On: 04/21/2011 01:20 PM
Final Approval Date: 04/22/2011
Packet Page 14 of 23
(Unaudited)
$589,545
-
589,545
6,869
Labor & Benefits 149,264
Supplies 44,494
Labor & Benefits 143,316
Supplies 61,049
184,555
589,545
-
-
-
-
$0
(1) An additional $80,602 in expenditures were eligible for reimbursement from this funding source, however, due
to funding constraints, these expenditures were absorbed by Fund 111 -Street Fund
OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Total other financing sources (uses)
Net changes in fund balances
Fund balances - beginning
FUND BALANCES - ENDING
EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES
REVENUES
Annual Vehicle Fee
Other revenues
Total Revenues
EXPENDITURES (1)
Professional Services
Road Maintenance (includes repairs, patching, crack sealing)
Traffic Control
Vehicle Charges
Total Expenditures
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance
Transportation Benefit District
For the year Ended December 31, 2010
Packet Page 15 of 23
Packet Page 16 of 23
Packet Page 17 of 23
Packet Page 18 of 23
Packet Page 19 of 23
Packet Page 20 of 23
Packet Page 21 of 23
Packet Page 22 of 23
Packet Page 23 of 23