Loading...
10308 242ND PL SW.PDFiiiiiiIIII lillIII III4505 10308 242ND PL SW ADDRESS: 2 -S yyPG TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 00 � 5-c5D 00 Dt/ 7 V l BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):_ goal - COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: I �� �o�� DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver IQ Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DA' EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: -4 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LATEMP\DSTs\Fortns\Street File Checklist.doc ;DATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE i °'' PERMIT NUMBER,: DB sURE/APTI ' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ADORE83 t ,r'',rf y «., ) h;;,,,.n-. / 7 .t,... �'; �, •.-,,; 'i j ;' OWN.. E/NAME OF BUSINESS"/i �f'/ra''_ a�� It f f /'4^ 1 »}^ >/' fir'!' , f ),.'i j r/ f �p• i' f i.. .62. '%.r, PLAT NAI,(y5E/SUBDMSION NO. •••• A I••. 'r. n.l� Y .4 LOT NO. ,Y LID NO. LID FEE MAILING ADDRESS ,.'j _ f _JI �... - i ' I , f ! PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved RW Permit Required EXISTING PROPOSED Street Uee Permit Req'd nspeetlonReq m Sid O. 9my F ZIP TELEPHONE w• / : ( t t' l "') f r..., r�' '' 1- z ' r . i r" "' REQUIRED DEDICATION «"•' elgr—oqutred ,.! r i.. �+' ..+�.✓,.1 �u.• .,i 1 .:-;;;•:. Wiring required Q NAME ;' METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED / J� i/ .I, ^ P,✓N f,. YES NO 17 Lip* z ADDRESS REMARKS = • • '�h' 1, OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE +; h a r'N M: J 1,: L<.. ! ' aw ~' ^ CITY 1+, r ZIP TELEPHONE l� /;� J r 1 iArr r ✓ r• .,�..� ir'.:..{�,,,,�./ // it 'f.. �°��' i /. __ c'.,�/. ., t. � "�.� �.., �,.«.—;] qd ! [::.�n.�•% ._ �...._ �• ._.! ,..> ! �r j. f"�? . 1�r;; r.. '7 <.. J r•.If� � <'. .,1., ` - ; ! ! _.>! h'P•�i;! i�l- .r l na.fW f' !-.: NAME �,...... ADDRESS CfTy ZIP I TELEPHONE STATE LICENSEE NUMBER g { EXP�III PROPERT Y TAX, Acy-OUNT PARCEL NO. + NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ REPAIR rZ? CYDS ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK GARAGE RETAINING WALL ❑ CARPORT ROCKERY (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: NUMBER "i NUMBER OF OF DWELLING STORIES UNIT DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE LyJ�� PLUMBING / MECH `[�COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ SIGN ❑ FENCE ( X FT) ❑ OTHER ❑ RENEWAL ENGINEERING / 1 REVIEWED/DATE 1'1"1'._ .F" ? �./i,., t+.. _/-..�. v ..,i'ri { Lei.. °'�. ••:� �'.. s�. FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE yr a rL VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND « ,.... REO POSTED I ..« .. 10 YES WNO . . SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED 1, EXP LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT fUR SIDE REAR O / /Ii'l, ".�6 4 �r�, Al k 30, 0,-0, �r : PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE 7 IL REO'D PR! VIDED s�- .;6., �•- • �i it A,•. � � � � 1� g/fit r� � �T,(.. P.,Jx.,�:�bi�r�..' r� .•a� ,� P,;! f'f(rj �� t REMARKS i .. C� >i 7 r C�,'•1 'vt l t (�t/'I f_ IIt $ -f-v r'. (G.. + y CHECKED BY �r ,�:i�r. TYPE OF CONPTR CTION _�..,4 C04 �,. ...� OCCUPANT GROUP �,,% ' CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER i ''+ :y SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED YES JAREA r;, '" ' OCCUPANT LOAD �:.•I � M'.R:..,W� REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RE01D % I LOT SLOPF oc PLAN CHECK NO: !' 1 ,r� VESTED DATE THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, ORIYIEVAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. j PERMIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CrrrS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' i HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT 1 AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S ? SATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNATURE', WNE 'OR AQFNT)' i/ DATE SIGNED, �.... �'1' rt,lr i` it/i�. •�•K tF. � ✓r !-�' ... .... - C„., ^r,..,.. ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 10/01 „%rlp&,,.. ��I p....f, xwwj 1#/'l i'• ?xt;, frL✓�«r �' irn� VALUATION $ ' :%t 1 P Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check Building Plumbing Mechanical {. ! `;,i;� `' •':; " Grading Recording Fee Engr. Review City Surcharge Engr. Inspection =.r("; °^ State Surcharge G Traffic Mitigation Plan Chk Deposit Fire Review Receipt # Fire Inspection Total Amount Due p ft,' : 4,.,4 ,1 Landscape Insp. Receipt # APPLICATION APPROVAL' CALL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building OSiclal or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and -OR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged In space provided. (425) OFFICIALS SIG / RE ' j "�� f' DATE I 6 C ,r :d.✓�{ 771-0220 'RELEASED BY A DATE ' EXT 1333 ti` ';, . . 771-0221 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR F PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 391,. o0 EET FILE ss,o 0 '' Owner: Firstline Construction /Address: 944 Maple ST: e v Edmonds Wa . 98020 0I / mac, KO W Ph. (206) 498.5339 v�•'�j Q L WE Tax Parcel : OOS530-000-047-01 \ �O/ fh T 06eK _ V'1 roperty Address:10308 242od PL . S.W. !/ Sh E — — / Z,��+ � r- _ A Edmonds Wa. 98020 v '� � 1 — o ro � 3(A.00 aQ�c�a.�oa C; a0 \ / Fk!i1 SIA r•1,OOQ use N\eNY st. ab ast:to3,1 �� P y �• ° LOT COVER& .F 0& LOT AREA = 8953 S.F. O 3� R 0 G k. ky M o` HOUSE & DECKS - 2505 S.F. JL� J o0 COVERAGE 2505/8953 = 28.01 % p I..oWcST FooTING IMPERVIOUScrr>:FACEcX deI.EV. 3(,0.©0 St-Rr(� M 'i �, �elt% HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO-2680 S.F. �3,��.3d GCkF ,tom• DRIVEWAY & WALKS = 634 S.F. 3 ! '/�\ TOTAL - 3314 S.F. 77"<•�Q •Avn . ... _ rV� OO • pC' �? . ., WALK HEIGHT CALCS ( I 01 r" pe / A- gt,00 J l ocINVWAY�I. / C-A g D --roe ` .00 8 / ��1�����% 3102•� 55 Avg. Grade =24.77.5. al3 (� _ G i `1 A Actual = "9a25 ; Maximum _.ZONE SETBACKS: /''1� A_ ,6" ull3� _e ice\ k! �a�sA FRONTd. \S,� �,a J_ Ek�T 3�, 0,0 R E C E (V E D SIDE ;.REAR 30 \ .: '.. APR 1 92004 :- OTHERntD c�,s HEIGHT �, y , t0" SUM rl�/ T �, PERMIT COUNTER PLANNING DATA �1 NAME: �(AI ( Tq DATE: 1 J` 0 H SITE ADDRESS: 1,301r6 - J.qw(e Sw PLAN CHK#: 04 - 074, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ConrrvC7 rwo - 524 S F R REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: Ye I No MAP PAGE: U 0 3 CORNER LOT: es / No FLAG LOT: Yes / No ZONING: R S'6 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: 9 a - ��,g 0 Studv Reauired: 5-T7Y u l(er^k Coked "to,- S ` XoQO - a ❑ Waiver ❑ Conditional Waiver / p SEPA DETERMINATION: /L_f ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list wJ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) All Exempt Nor- i, She(el,nQ ; � �a) 6, rho,, $00 cx SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Street: 7. S Left Side: 7.5 Right Side: 79 Rear:- 7- Actual Setbacks- 31 1� Street: .0 LeftSide: to Right Side: . U Rear: 30 Street map checked for additional setback required? Yes / No / NA DETACHED STRUCTURES: %✓lone exlyr� ROCKERIES: 6 FENCES/TRELLISES: n%d^Q BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: I /�' QAl 54a w✓N , STAIRS / DECKS: 6 , PARKING: Required:__), Actual:�"� LOT AREA: (?. q S 3 �i p �7 _ ,��J LOTVERAGECOions: j�O 1 53 � ( �� V' �5 0 Calculations: U fl- BUILDING HEIGHT: r �� �� CUf 374 Datum Point: �� Datum Elevation: U Maximum Allowed: a S Actual Height:"1 j0 A.D.U. CREATED? No Yes SUBDIVISION: 5 — LJO Q - NO Cd/ (kGTir� CQ A J l t�Yj I a Pit V LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: Yes No OTHER:' Plan Review Bv: GO 113 NewBPPlanningDataFomLDOC II,aE N " Pritical Areas Checklist ----------------- ----------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrolo /vegetation) I. Site AddressAL ovation: - , S550- obo- 0 - oo c C 2. Property Tax Account Number. 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? t 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply, 1 Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes"on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of l Q feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30•A ( a vertical rise of l 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of -less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: /L/P ; App-ox, Depth: --' 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. wpm. What season(s) of the year? 8.. Site is in the floodway _,a,/t floodplain�_ of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows ac, the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? --L— mat time of year? 10. Site is primarily: forested ,�..� meadow : shrubs :mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) Jr ��. 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: kAh �O RECEIVED � TUBBSO(Boo u(SInQ30 MAR - 8 2004 PERMIT COUNTER January 9, 2004 First'•inc *st action, uic. 16605 - 71 st Place West Edmonds, Washington 98037 Geotechnical Engineering Report Residential Property 10300 Block of 242°d Place West wrm � FILE Edmonds, Washington File No. HAL2-01 INTRODUCTION This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical conditions pertinent to proposed residential development of your property located in the 10300 block of 242°1 Place West in Edmonds, Washington. Our services have been performed at your request and in accordance with our services agreement dated December 16, 2003. The subject property consists of Lots 2 and 3 of Short Subdivision S-2000-82. We understand that you propose to develop the property to include two single family residences. You have asked us to evaluate geotechnical conditions within the property as a basis for providing you with information and recommendations pertinent to the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services includes: 1. Review of published geologic and topographic information regarding the subject site aP_d adjacent areas. 2. Surface geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas. 3. Subsurface investigation of soil conditions at the site by means of test pits excavated by a backhoe and operator you provided. 4. Preparation of this geotechnical engineering report providing our observations relative to geotechnical conditions at the site and providing our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical elements of the proposed development. Our services have been provided on the basis of a review of existing information available to us, geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas during December 2003, observation of test pit explorations on December 19, 2003, discussions with you and Mr. Gary S. Cooper, and our experience. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS The property is located between 104`h Avenue West and 242nd Place SW in Edmonds, Washington as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. As shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2, which is based on a drawing dated 4-2-02 by JBMF Consulting Engineers, the subject property consists of a Lots 2 and 3, located in the southeastern part of the shortplat and accessed via 242"d Place SW. Our Critical Areas Evaluation report dated April 10, 2002 for the area of the short plat that includes the subject property, described topographic, vegetative and prior development conditions within the area of the short plat. Since that report was submitted, the area of the short plat has been cleared and graded to create three building pads, driveways accessing the three lots have been constructed and paved, and storm and sanitary side sewers have been installed. Site grading included construction of a keystone block wall and two rockeries. Recommendations for design and construction of these improvements was not included in either our previous or present scope of services. We understand that the existing rockeries will be reconstructed based on recommendations by others. Geologic conditions within the area of the short plat were also described in our earlier report. As part of our present services we explored subsurface conditions within the area of the short plat via six test pits, including four test pits within the subject property, excavated at the locations indicated on the Site Plan. A description of the subsurface exploration program and the logs of the test pits are presented in the Appendix. The observed subsurface conditions are consistent with those described in our earlier report. The subject property is underlain by glacial outwash cor_sisting of sand and gravel deposited during the advance and retreat of the last glacier to occupy this area some 13,500 to 15,000 years ago. Local patches of glacial till, deposited directly by the glacial ice, exist within the area of the short plat but none was observed within the subject property. Some fill locally exists within the site. Because of the high infiltration capacity of the surficial soils, little or no surface water runoff occurs within the site, and no emergent groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, on the slope adjacent to 104' Avenue West, or elsewhere within the site. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com w Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The subject property is suitable for the proposed residential development provided that proper site development procedures and the recommendations below are followed. The native soils underlying the site consist of glacial outwash sand and are suitable for conventional residential foundation design and construction procedures. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK We recommend that all sod, organic soil, fill and debris be removed from settlement sensitive areas (e.g., building, pavement and slab areas). The subgrade surface in slab and pavement areas should be proof -rolled with heavy rubber -tired equipment after excavating to the desired grade. The purpose of the proof -rolling is to bring the near -surface soils to a uniform density and to identify any loose areas which might require recompaction or removal and replacement with structural fill. Temporary cut slopes for foundation excavations are expected to be as much as ten feet in height. Temporary cut slopes in, the medium dense to dense native soils may be inclined as steeply as 1H:1V and, except for minor sloughing, can be expected to stand at that inclination for a period of several weeks if protected from drying. Temporary cut slopes in existing loose or fill soils may be inclined as steeply as 1.5H:1V if protected from drying. Protection from drying applies to natural soil moisture only. Do not add water to temporary cut slopes to improve stability. If steeper temporary cut slopes are required we should be consulted to develop shoring recommendations. We understand that you anticipate a permanent cut slope up to 3 feet in height within the eastern portion of the subject property, and two -tiered rockery wall for erosion protection of that slope. If rockery walls are used for this purpose, we recommend that each wall be no more than 4 feet in height, and that the toe of the rockeries (see Figure 3) be located above a plane sloping 45 degrees downward from the adjacent property line. If higher cut slopes are required we should be consulted to provide other recommendations for slope protection. STRUCTURAL FILL All new fill in settlement -sensitive areas shall be placed as compacted structural fill after the site has been prepared as described above. All structural fill material shall be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 4 increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. Structural fill shall contain no more than 5 percent fines for placement in wet weather. The percent fines can be higher for placement in dry weather, providing that the fill material is moisture -conditioned as necessary for proper compaction. The sandy native outwash soils at the site are suitable for structural fill. Structural fill placed in building or pavement areas shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except for the upper 2 feet which shall be compacted to 95 percent. We recommend that structural fill be placed in loose layers not more than 8 inches thick if a small vibratory roller compactor is used (or not more than 12 inches if a 10-ton or larger vibratory roller compactor is used), conditioned to the proper moisture content for compaction, and uniformly compacted before placing subsequent layers. FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed residence can be supported on conventional spread and strip footings founded on firm native soil, or can be supported on structural fill directly overlying firm native soil. Footings may be proportioned using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. This value applies to the total of dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. This value also assumes a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous spread footings and 24 inches for isolated spread footings. The minimum depth of embedment below final adjacent grades is 18*inches for exterior footings and 12 inc:^.es for interior footings on firm native soil. Footings adjacent to a downhill slope shall be sufficiently deep to provide at least 6 feet of horizontal separation between the footing and the slope face, and shall be sufficiently deep or distant from the slope that a 1:1 plane extended from the edge of the footing does not intersect the slope face. Because local areas of loose soil may be encountered at the same level as the medium dense to dense soils, we recommend that the soils beneath the footings be compacted using hand operated vibratory equipment in lifts as described above. Any loose or disturbed soils in the footing excavations, including any test pit backfill, should be recompacted prior to concrete placement. Floor slabs can be supported on grade if site preparation is accomplished as previously recommended, or can be supported by structural fill directly overlying firm native 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com 1 � • ti Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 5 soil. The subgrade soils should be proof -rolled as recommended above and compacted using vibratory equipment or replaced with compacted structural fill if loose areas are observed. A base course layer consisting of a minimum thickness of 4 inches of clean gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a capillary break. FOUNDATION RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and shall be designed as such. Assuming that the walls that are allowed to deflect 0.01 times the height of the wall, we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 2H:1 V percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 60 pcf should be used. Resistance to lateral footing loads can be developed both through friction on the base of the footings and passive pressures along the sides. Friction resistance on the base of the footing be computed using an internal soil friction angle of 30 degrees. Passive soil pressures may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot, providing the backfill around footings is compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). These resistance values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free - draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting structural elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 3 feet of the retaining walls; no compaction tests will be necessary within 3 feet of the walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth -wall, 4-inch-diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe, nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi drainage product or equal, and surrounded by pea gravel or well -graded gravelly sand or sandy gravel with less than 3 percent fines (soil finer than the No. 200 mesh sieve) based on the fraction smaller than 3/4 inch. The drainpipes should discharge into tightlines sloped to drain by gravity to the existing storm sewer system. Roof drains shall not discharge into the footing drain system. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.COM 14 Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 6 SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL We understand that the City of Edmonds requires water to be routed through an on - site infiltration trench prior to being conveyed to the storm sewer system. We recommend that the bottom of the infiltration trench be sufficiently deep and distant from any adjacent downhill slopes so as to meet the setback requirements specified above for footings. We recommend that water from footing drains be routed directly to the storm sewer via a tight line. If the footing drains must be routed through the infiltration trench, the outlet from the infiltration trench to the storm sewer shall be at an elevation at least 3 feet lower than the footing drains in order to avoid the possibility of water from roof drains backing up into the footing drain system. The surficial soils within the subject property are susceptible to potential erosion and shallow debris slides if disturbed by construction or other activities. Erosion controls are therefore recommended, including the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt revegetation. LIMITATIONS ' This report has been prepared for Firstline Construction, Inc. and its representatives for use in planning, permitting and designing residential development of Lots 2 and 3. Descriptions of subsurface conditions relative to foundation support and other aspects of the proposed . development are based on surface observations and shallow subsurface explorations, and conditions should be confirmed by observations in the excavations at the time of construction. Within. the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services. have been accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, should be understood. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 7 We trust that this report meets your present needs. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. o{ W ashy Yours very truly, Tubbs Geosciences o h 7 Ilk E�iaeM^9 (iwlo9�t y �� rce 75s 4Sed Geo�o Donald W. Tubbs Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Engineering Geologist p,T S. q �v�P �F WA S1, �� tics � o V) Ql z -10 �p 24330 <v� S/ ONALR��G\� EXPIRES: 12/24/04 Document ID: HAL.261R1 Enayat S. Aziz, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering consultant to Tubbs Geosciences 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com • I VICINITY MAP TUBBSOSOo �SC�'snc so FIGURE 1 8 e a I I I 1 II I I 11 I 1 i R l j,;�; 11 ,1 i 7! N =i c m M m N Z GRAPHIC SCALE (w /EE1) �� wOw to P�w�l nlMln �nla ft-9 12' IM ft ow�nnCl IM AIM 0y 1'!' CP sM Gnwrgwl IM 1� CO& aV ►q o,e wnncl le 9 F!- I _/-c2j' \ \ • • ORIGINAL VAR IA 6:1 BATTER + MIN.THICKNE96 4"— Z' QUARRY 5ZZ OQ� I yv W x 4 i 1 I cD 1"MINUS WASHED ROCK AS NEEDED I FILTER FASVC AS NEEDED OUND it" EXCAVATION ONL`( W PEILF PIPE AS NEEDED FOR SUBSURFACE WA?ER,. Rockery walls shall be constructed of rocks in the following size categories: Two -man rocks (300 to 600 pounds), 13" in least dimension; Three-man rocks (800 to 1200 pounds), 16" in least dimension; Four -man rocks (1500 to 2200 pounds), 18 " in least dimension. The rock material shall be hard, sound, durabic and free from woathered portions, seams, cracks, and other defects. Rocks should be as tabular in shape as possible; rounded or very angular rocks shall be avoided. The larger rocks shall be placed at the base of the wall. Four -man rocks shall be used for the bottom course in walls higher than 6 feet. The lowest course of rocks shall be keyed into firm foundation material at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade. Rocks shall be selected and placed to minimize void space between rocks. Rocks shall be placed in a manner such that the long axis of the rock is normal to the face of the wall. To the greatest extent possible, rocks shall be placed with faces in contact; point contact shall be avoided. Inclining interfaces between rocks shall slope downward toward the back of the wall. After setting each course of rock, voids between the rocks shall be chinked on the back with quarry rock to eliminate any voids larger than two inches across. TUBBSO(BOO W'SnOsa ROCKERY WALL SCHEMATIC FIGURE 3 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions within the subject site and adjacent areas were explored by excavating six test pits with a track -mounted backhoe on December 19, 2003. The test pit locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The locations are approximate and were. estimated in the field based on site features shown on the Site Plan. The explorations were backfilled with the excavated material and compacted with the backhoe bucket. The test pits were continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who observed the materials encountered, noted ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system shown in Figure A-1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-3. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FCOARSE GROUP DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAINED GP PUGHLY-GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL on No. 4 Sieve SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE.TO COARSE SAND More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY -GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY Liquid Limit ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY Less Than 50 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or More HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch -general accordaoce with ASTM D2488-90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487.90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. kTUBEBS(3(902C0(3nQ90 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A-1 LOG OF TEST PIT • DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION (FEET) TEST PIT TP-1 0 - 1.0 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 1.0 - 4.0 SM Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 4.0 - 5.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 5.0 - 7.0 SM Gray silty sand with some gravel (very dense, damp) [Vachon till] 7.0 - 9.0 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt (very dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-2 0 - 0.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 0.5 - 1.5 SP Brownish gray gravelly sand with trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 1.5 - 3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 3.5 - 5.5 SM Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS&BOO� MOOD FIGURE A-2 LOG OF TEST PIT t DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL (FEET) 0 - 2.5 SP 2.5 - 3.5 SP 3.5 - 4.0 SM 4.0 - 7.0 SM 7.0 - 9.0 SP 0 DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP-3 Brown sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots, some construction debris (loose, damp) [fill] Gray sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots, some construction debris (medium dense, damp) [fill] Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional ourwash] Brownish gray sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-4 0 - 0.5 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 6.0 - 3.0 SP Brownish gray sand with trace of gravel, some silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 3.0 - 6.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS00 ac 00CyC� c(Ba FIGURE A-3 LOG OF TEST PIT • DEPTH BELOW SOIL GROUP GROUND CLASSIFICATION SURFACE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION (FEET) TEST PIT TP-5 0 - 3.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [fill] 3.5 - 4.5 SM Reddish brown silty sand with trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 4.5 - 7.0 SP Medium brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recesssional outwash] Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-6 0 - 1.0 SM Medium grayish brown silty sand with some gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [fill] 1.0 - 2.0 SM Dark brown silty sand with trace of gravel, some roots ( medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] 2.0 - 6.0 SP Medium grayish brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash] 6.0 - 7.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, some gravel (dense to very dense, damp) [Vashon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS�C8 �C� �@MSO FIGURE A-4 y rn.rrTT TABRTc•-. ___ scctm'D In P, N (� q J �,." H (it, WIRE. FAERIL ._._. R E C.E,1 Tt7 E ® I. CpM1... K,D (>,: V p ... �" �E� �� A 1�y APPROVED AS NOTED 1t' K [ 181VM.t;N1' APR 1 9 2004 �-�( [,�r�-�� , r o-12• BY ENGINEERING na PERMIT COUNTER p Il - t.. , - ate IVA ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO �" % Alb' E' COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS . ._..--...."•) O• �... '......-'.. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN �'�(1 CONTINUOS RDLLS. USE STAPLES /V' �/ (.,X! �•� t VASIIt:U li((AVEI_ IN DR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH / ���O\� ��.� ✓ 0 •��� i illF: TRt:H(:II ANU 0 DOTH SIDES DT FABRIC TU WIRE, �V ,�j y�,� ©p j i FILTER FABRIC. FENLT: UN illF. SIIRt ACE. - a.J ..r' � ` � '�� 'C ACCEPTABLE T(GHTLINE uvISIDLE F0 3� q �' ,� --_ � MATERIAL l,Cl t�CS RACE �T `[. IL NESII SUPPORT FCEv' ,O� SDR 35UTMOI(T FILTER FA [CE119OSIU4 t JNTRa, AND IJRAINACR�v�•� �SCH 40 ' , ,. c c o �� 8 0 RANCOR c:_c�N r coo _...{._ �► �, . ©a ! 1 ' IKIRY BO11t" OF � FILTER �� "'�, .AQ .� 351 • E 7. . Q N �.NATERIAL O' 711 12' I i / /., • X �-� sac, !A- P, K P' WOOD IMISTS nrl UNJIVALENT G -., --•:_���s�..::. (�'� //0' WASIN:D RI1CK fiRATE �J ( ` l� 00 0 .....�qVADRIC VA , ro P 35 _oD c:y; , 1' �\ QC) CAcH enslN DA 1 1.IVA 1 1 NNI PLACE. FII.fER fAUltll: BETWEEN FRAM:: -- 1' `� , AND GRATE, PLACE 7/0' VAS14ED GRAVEL coiae_ QAfTt V ;I A INCITES Nl(ill AR(NIND CATCH BASIN ""�"""" _ 1 D K 1� - 11I 1'ILTI:It WATER. STRAW BALES MAY DE USED IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES (SEE DETAIL E1.LU OPHN APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER UR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. Mill ( X I 4 `r© 3b-5.aa,( nns ArPLu:nnHN SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALA. 1IHE.l' DURING "1 �l�V_ 31�1.5p 54, © CuNTRIXTIHN PFRI(IU. T - � CJI (�,� • ©�j 1. SST ��T i t 4Cs •;. w ICITY INSPECTION REQUIRED [1N ALI_ EROSION CCNVTROI� \ A. I NFASURFS BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN.YI l.. 00 12 I~ C E I V ® TOP 3T, .00 6RAINS NOT 1O 8E TIED INTO F < < MAR - 0 2004 �' �� I, MENTION SYSTEM �' � � � `'� �' PERMIT COUNTER x K c�1,'� ©o372.5p Cs� >, i APR 19 2004�� °i— _m_- ___-___ ,�r o X ..._—Y, �(�3.05 ro�TrNG 1:1.1�. 't-7_.1.0© PERMIT COUNTER 3(,3.b9 s Q p r c� 00 pPJ ; \NA(LY, � � TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIOf�.� ° .,.� 1` y,x s-r t ENTRANCE REQUIRED j� IS( w E o ` Cep �m 'T 37a ,00 OWNER. FIRSTLINE CONSTRUCTION LOTCOVERAGE r �, NAI o� \ 944 MAPLE ST. LOT AREA = 8953 S.F. EDMONDS WA. 98020 /a HOUSE &DECKS = 2505 S.F. o COVERAGE 2505/8953 28.01 SS/ MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SL 1E A�`'� �� ` �"I� `�.2 •o� �1 Ph. (206) 498-5339 U��QUIdgE� ALLOWED 11 p` IMPERVIOUS SURFACES / �•; . G 1 HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO =2680 S.F. Q SITE ADDRESS DRIVEWAY & WALKS = 634 S.F. TOTAL = 3314 S.F. / / AN Ll)MONDS WA, 98020 � . , � �.. '`" '.• -- pr,.� TAX PARCEL # --t Ajo L� LEDGEND.-t-�,k-�.E�� tiTRA NC ��� GLJ�r,,�(tla.�.s `,�, `` ,fir r�N I q p"- C-, o EXISTING GRADE -- ._ _. GRADING e FINISH GRADE .- lcl,�� ,DING PLAN s r/�c is 'gas �'�r�Ri of `�iI SILT FENCE SCAL.F.: 1/8"=1 FOOT �s EW�9 �p/C �/� y GRADING CALCULATIONSNINNNN. `�►. \ Is � J4 � I I , I •'r �. • L, '��C CUBIC YARDS CUT = 356,r / 1 o o CUBIC YARDS GRADED =125 �.... QDIrt/ TOTAL CUT/GRADE 481 �► ` e t r• r. Al Vgol W SAM_ PERMIT COUNTER .7 LE ST r:Y... _. �A WM < S� W/SH❑RT PLAT IMPR❑VEMENTS GARAGE POLY 10308 ,��~ 160 PSI W/TRACER WIRE Q FRONT DOOR 2,5' ❑NNECTI❑N COPPER TO LY of ED,,o CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS —BUILT ADDRESS 10308 -242 Place SW HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR SCALE Frank Lacato. NTS DATE DRAWN WATERLINE At 1890 7-16-2004 iBY K, Haney NO, 2004-0349 . • n � c oo In H 607 f'Ai•E28 ' Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR a, AXEL WICESMM AMID BETTY M. WICKSTRCIK, his wife, for and in consideration of TM AND N0/11DOw • • - • • • - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars in hand paid, conveys and warrants to ROY W. LUDWIG AND WIM J. LUDWIG, his wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish State of Washington: sy V4 Lot bT, Richmond Park Homes, Division No. 2, according to plat ' thereof recorded in valuate 14 of plats, pages 11 and 12, records of said couutye (; txaotana,in' Subject to: tt Easement for drainage and access purposes throe feet in width 1,yin { southerly of the northwesterly Line of amid Lot 47. : REAL ESTATE SA AX SUBJECT TO easements, restrictions and reservations of rsoorde A000"T quo r 7 Pfe.vo'r wn ...i..4._�.C.te NOV 15 06 Dated this 19th day nl Ootober, 1956. STATF. OF WASHINGTON. + I sI Cuunty�I_ King-- ___. _Cs., On this _els____day n(- - --- - 90W-1141r— -- A. n. In 1;6 1-1., me. th. ..... I_ signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of__ _..__j[r Rbi gton Iola• , .n,rnn..;..,...1 and sworn. personally appeared__.- - _111CM M . MICUTAly!_ - to me known to be the individual described in and who executed :he Lnea..t11: inslrrnt,enl 1.+, har-if w,,.i as attorney In fact of_..AIRT._IQOKayllm _._ - . _. _....... nls.. of),J i,r rb v,ih.vl, wrrr{ m krr.rn•{rdvv.{ t., nu thM __g__ha signed and sealed the !a qm��e nt .. _hw __.voluntary act and dec.l nn.l a, 11- 1—And , ••hn,tm �• w. t wnd .1.•.•.1 of the said AM WIOK9Tl1411 for the uses an.i ryurp.,.w. th.•se;n mcm;,.ne.{. wn.l ,.n ,.w+h stated that the power of auorner wihorizing the execution of this instrument has not peen re.•oked and thwt the sw1.1 AULraTital' —�� j_is now living. WITNE33 my hapa_agd trlificjal peed hir4to affixed the .an, ! . ;n this etti c e ahuv cy .... Nwr.7 Y«Al:e •!er r!te al.,.... .Waahi�ngtiap d A PORTION OF THE SE OF THE SW 1/4, SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 27 H, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. ' CERTIFICATION CITY OF EDMONDS SP S-2000-82 k,. Ily that t'rlore lh• lepd Deno•,(•) of in • pp op-ly d.wriD.tl 'bow and /ii c we .flat tole j IN.lon Intl =y-n d ,.. an`cantlltipna la motl• a�✓ DEDICATION AGCrac MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT m our nee conaenl one accwa�lnpS to my�ur aeon lan o PAR MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION, AS INTENDED IN THIS DECLARATION, Property O,mr •Ignotw• IMw_ / I _ __� '-`m APPLY TO ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A $TABLE AND USABLE ROAD SURFACE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS n OF SAID TRACT SHONN ON THIS PLAT AN IDENTIFIED ABOVE. THE COST OF SAID MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND I 06 REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION SMALL ALSO BE BORNE EQUALLY AND JOINTLY RY THE OWNERS. THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSDRS. AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ° ASSIGNEES. OF DRAM DF M TF SAID LOTS 2-3. TOTAL Poom AND aA mpwMD PARx HOM[; dMMOx No. ]. R[cmD[n w wluuE I. a< PL.T; PApE ,]. - RCCOR06 MAINTENANCE, OPERATION, REPAIR, AND/OR RECONSTRDCnON, AS INTENDED IN TM1S DECLARATION, APPLY TO ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS AND LABOR REQUIRED TD d SNOHWIW cowry, WApYNpTDN; [xCEPT THAT PORnON d w0 Lan .l .sop 4 D[.cme[O Al Fa[aws: MAINTAIN A STABLE AND USABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN SAID SHOWN ON TNT$ PLAT AND IDENTIFIED ABOVE AS THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT. CdIYCNOND .i TIM YOeT NORTHERLY CO-IFA tY ENO LOT .), TIIE AV[ Pad} d rEUHWw; THE COST OF 5A10 MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND REPAIR ANO/OR RECONSTRUCTSHALL AL50 BE BORNE EQUALLY AND TI,ENNU adlM ]iW y' ini peiAMIEGE a �aJ�Y] It iE TO �N�xi[Ra[LnOAp' wAT1xiLMf OUiw[gIr TUNC O[ eNp lOT .): JOINTLY BY THE OWNERS, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS. AND ASSIGNEES, OF SAID LOTS 1-I. TUENtt NMTM ]]•h«• .• u., A u.T�l.HttIT oor I"s, I ET TD An I'Tosid aN -TH ra Nd1TItEmr LwE d s D OT Aq HOLD HARM LE88 AGREEMENT 1TIFWCEE �O. eSmi'0.' .ET .LWO .AID Np.lNplr Lw[ • pci.Ntt d L.T R[r rI TH[ HanM[Aertmr Ou<ceesona pves na Gp Nnq any pre..nl Or wD.epu.nt own•reHb Intweet in the'. Iona., one Ina uvo u THNEcOF4r' µ NpITHERLr uNE co TLAlO Lm . O T NOA [, ttti Doll Etlmontlar ahvll p. nlNe n /mlaaerin edl low pvrtia. na Nnq any vole btaraal, hereby opraa tool Intl City I ar ra.Ded. nom A RAWI:. OF MC pT.wt as 0 THEEINME -T OF YLONwNOMw 9 N.rt w THE 0.— as waxpteaL TE d ....a— w any pn0 pu donne roe earnagse /or in jlnetlw rnnei nicn muy be :.CCaL..v.•a f- I, n in. tutu,. to aPa«�: Ivne or Im>.u.omonta D�ra [xtmTtws natructlon, Oa^ITnon Intl main[, of lh' dolnage sy.tam andnere0o wales a ,Heave Ina CItY II Iron C�SEIy[Ni �bnanOs y 0 all dplmaalOrn domoga1. e.duding damage caused • INy by an Oct C, omieslvn IT la Cln. one I. Iles rNlel tn• Tor AND ME ,p1uSUAso CWp11dM1 nWtoon ° Iwo-. d then we 'w. 1-9ona, may lhem•alvm now na Iy in. win Ne lulus by rwevn of m• cenatrucllen, mobtenaneaeano IOA lover a R.Y w� W I. , warOtlan 1 eold ,allege syalem. :N. IrWe TRACT A OWNERSHIP AGRE�ucu• �,.�N•so ..,soon' ., w Awp...o-' IA TEN �lt TRACT A SMALL BE HELD IN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST BY LOTS J dt I. SAID OWNERS OF Rs.reYe N.mer: Sidi LOTS J I, THEIR HEIRS. SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNEES. SMALL BEAR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED TWTH OWNERSHIP OF TRACT A. CO�IN.xT; abldnOMf, RfSTINcIId[s Asp fAQM[NM1 CMT.wm w ix4TT]W[xT. _ OAnve.r ]; lee. men S[S]oJ NOTARY IN WITNESS WHEREOF w• eat wl held. Ind .•d.. CONDITIONS Q]AI/ll w I✓b/5ef Nam/ a T✓s[.0 Compuanca with Oil al lho conditions of opprowl round in end 11nd approval of the Mort wDdlNelon and Nem. Name A copy of .ale Document la locate. in FIT. S-2000-62 in the oIll- of the the of Ed non t. Planning City II EtlmanOe Plonnlnq Dirlalon.. APPROVED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF Name Nam• EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION BY /. , �� THIS I�l0 DAY OF WtA 200tS Clwnty a1Wa.nlnyta �ewric I Can,":ol I Wow d now .I-c,y .Moen-• that APP VED AND AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF MAG//t_/i .Z rrf�A! I 'NDS PIL DIVISION BY Wned this In""Imt and da,nlNWped It to Z wuntory wl 1-theue•' Intl pNma- m.Auen.d in In. Mewm-t. THIS 16 DAY OF J4A1WEj2D0j ; ^, NOTES ' W . al a41 My 1. Monument' NNtee Oetoaw 14, 2002. dr P bllc f ' M�'. Dotedlyn" /-/ R y� MygpoFtment 2L.c Tnl. loll o-..«" ", r.y m+addlte end N«t onlc mad oaY .tootle,. M WAC ]]2 �IJO-ODD. eo wring u nvyillw« 3. All Nru[luree en Lot. 2, J d[ I .boll be M1mowe-eacvnd Slate of WbMlnyylen A tree cle0rinq/ral•nllon plan .boll De .ubmlltad will any DullOinp permll tar anew llmily CwntY II .�..,"x/�.. �.L un Lot. 2. J ono I. .Inpla nouva �' I --lily that I Wow d hew ."Outs,, .Mdence Not S. Treat A and It, 10' puller shall be ....[owed Native crpwtn Area pen ECDL Sectlw 20.150. This _ a-] /, /IAN.K ;B- .Z-✓aI ♦A/ wen will remain a. an und.YMop.e .... ..Coal for o ant to Lot I. n acuu .poem 3 \ ♦ sgn.d tnM a. Nment and WJMIINWq d R to be (M./h-) n.• one fie Candtlm. 1 Ipprlwl mvel be met and an be found In In. Ibol lap, , Id in..nort wbdi..,_ EzO ree.. Wunlary act Igg„JpA ueea Ind eu. —tfan.a In the InehumenT. lwat.d in Fie 9-2000-82. V '. 7. At ins Olson br-lon con, -ant.. m• anVlctvr h OevMoper .null wdN WIN the lannln nd mglnewln9 a.partmmte p g o (( Slpnalun Ir to en•ur. foie rvpunement i. mot: Tr... that e n t ngord, a. Eel-mhod by the Planning Depdtment d r OuIrW to D• re end a pol IT Hi .i NotdY Publk I.qul- plot bnprovwnanM1 .hall be Plotwlae .1. Ian- d bd.. a/ oar nd end, db Tina. The •dM wool. tn•.. tr«s Ahell not p• m.A Dotal - compacise by starMq epulPmant d mal•MOI. within the dip Ill. of lM had, The Planning Melon moot opprow these dotectlon m.aoi—, _ uY pppp ntmrlt •xp res RR.1/ and to gradN O. /?`�/ Page 1 of 2 RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ....... .......... SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE SURVEY FOR: men Id /? JBMF Consulting Engineers reed. Ill. d�I day o,_ Md0 the m boeY ...- Ir -. of a the nys M.P OEPgEQxTS A NApE BY ME p1 MxDCR �' John B. Friel, pop• r. of rw,.e1 el �RfbftlL„ � ..ECTLY MY wRErnax w cDNFonM.NLE .E, THE THE EIE REa,wEMan a� THE wRNEa Ix acoRD,xo AcOT� a[Er d + Sonomo Development Pment PE PLS 4 10303 NE 190th St PoeoxzT EVERETT, �YCYWL111(lCy. CT \�•y Iligjc' Bothell, WA 98011 WA 89208 ,Do p ED2-mos (125) 7)t-]892 MP' SUDI. of R•cdd. aRnFIc.TE Na. TOT.. AwN. Tc uA�: - HMM Dec. D. 21). 1' 2, - --- --- - -- --- - -- - -- -- --- - - AS- - - - -� - - -- - SE 1141W 1/4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANW3 EAST, W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTARY GI.uAAL ILUL OppsTpl IN WNESS .HEREOF Re xt wr nmC. Ono e«Ie, eARCR NKUAK +• m RATS. P-1111, .—ON 12. [OCOx05 m SnWwiIN M7Y. �RESrwcrWCORO[0 Rr RARm R. Arr OOL TVuf 0.�ry PAF{5 ; AN.9 }. R[Cdi05C cOLnSN CpmIY, OTONCpro[O iN 9NAR IN M TY 0' SNW RL STATE OF RASWNGION. 1A.KN1 AND ME rtmn AND cpApnwe TNE I- R.Y w wa.N ma Nm. A We.q nil .IN ono nc.IMI Y u. wuw,.nv R.IsbN Nm,iv. +x+Sxl. <__S .rs,.xnoNs .rm r•atlwn co+r..an w .s,+wrN eROIOSfD lO 1N Ex 1—ON No. ]. afcaom IN NRUNE +moyExroAc i+uLDrs A[wims`°ar�"s o� n.�A__' GfSCRrem As rouo.s: ME TRLF. —T Of ftwRxd rtNCE SwM .t3Ty,.' KIT ALONG ME NpIr� TT UNT OF SAID L.1 .) . ITAN. OE W.ee ET. TN ]AS'Je• EAST A dSTANCE m 113 I] RE1 TO AN ITn15CCTON .+M TNT SW nrFAly Wd K SARI LOL .^; O+.' EAST OF 1M CE N_ I. Sup L.IT.O: pSTANK ,�).e] f¢T N AN mTERS[CTgN NM ,M M e}q'GI• Kst ALmG S.VO NM1NERr YNE A —TAN. OF,..1 RLt TO T1K Y CONKN OF SAO LOT Il; n¢_ 4WRM].:STERY A— THE NOR TN[RART UK OFv LOT .1 x 1 —A—ATo ME R e c A m .q RET AN c 117ANcf rr v.11 —1 To ne ,RUE —T -A. IN 1NE cwNTY OF srrpwlnar.".. OF NAswNcrw. .—T AND ME —1 AND --I MERE?: T ymr ..rr �T L.a'.ip w, • A lY..ly N.IA..f dIM,Y rM A¢ u tea e'u.Nr M w 1wu..I,.Nr R.veRq Nurser. 1IT53� �. 1°50 CGYFN R COAX-11. RESn.C— AND EASEMfNR OONTARA[D IN .ASTRWENT: IT mAry I-- IS,]]OD MOPdSfO LOT 2 Lon AT accaRos sNOFa1aNR Isar muE'Nn dw saN NO. ]. INNT.LUME +. m PUTS umi MAT IoI sAo Lon .) ANo wDcsiAs rauoRs ia ETr16%'e+S:cs1`ae'iAT1:mN°iALw1lNpLT1sAn LOT s�Nci a°ao ee FtET; MEN¢ —IN aTVI.Se• usT A U11AN. OF 11.T1 —1 1. AN przRSEcnaN ,.M ME RLr uNE of su LOT .]; TNENC[� aRTN i°•'o:: iOTT DOTA"rcEcc OF 11-2T:ITEI TO w mTERSECTNa rM TN[ aR�Nui. Iirt v sAro Loi a; A n1ENa NwM .}mm• . 11 ALONG s u NOR —I urR: A Drz1ArA¢ OTT..' T.T. To ,NE Nm„KASIERLY OR OT' I.O LOT [ A PApuS m AO YEET uIN .. DISTANCE Of S1J.°EYEET°IT M IRIIL AE TO RWT OF AW E.scMwN_AND THE 1ERMe AND mNpl,as MEREGr:SIANOrm. o11ww sY Lw RA, RA, Frot aw r I�b e,a RTm. A .Ic A. u lA.)Y _1 IM mnnw.l.nY .-ael� ,15e R.v.Mq NUMr ,TS}I. CONE -ANT, IN Cp1pnON; RESnw�ON �ANp EASENflAT3 CM)AR20RISTRWCHT: IT .mlMq Nurser. CERTIFICATION} PIaNIY awr NPMeR. IMr � (� RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ................... SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE RIO Id, r. d tNil . 27 eGG -of -' -O wLlADEe. N OR En . — GI A. awMt O1 Lh fE -• D— ,aC ­"'Ya51 Vyti=I6lw ET �EuaVA iPo. AeYoa68MCL lX.•1 YP Mp. � srPE.�ar aroma. Nam. Nmna Nan. Nmn. Nmn. State of R Ingtm Cw,ty If I c Uly toot I Moo. m I, N mti.lmt[ry .AW.Tc. Ihot Ivvsw Mdne ludvx nnry_fyosm{ maw— .ign.G IW. k.wmmt me OCMnO. Wd It To III (W./nm) n« mG rOIVlnmy mttffm tn, ae. ma dIYPI... IRmtMId r, tn. iIISL nt. P�N?A� B9rr S . Ot /�� ;O t ] i _, dTy O IeOP­NMu OL6 i. /OA1NA. Aue-io. .j My roPoktm«t .�:« a•s•ns 'n,��w "'C;'�• Stotl of Wa.ninglm , I cntify Inot I I,— m now .oli.fmtwy eAd.,, that .ign.G tWI T,.Ir t mG Oano.l«q« It IO G. (ni./nw) a« mG „ unlmy Gel fro tn. u one OLT— m 11—d in m. In Id t Signal.. 01 NO O,y PNWk MyI YY ppdnlmml .ap.Il PLA HING DEPARTMENT EDMOADS PLANNNG DEPARTMENT • �TE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EDYONDS ENdNEEPING DCPARIMENT DAIS HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT AT ej:N,I.I -A.nNn .•r w' n« u�cPIT .T EOnowl�TmT m .o.— ..o•..N .un.w —AAd wy„c11 rATI.T .NIp, u In. W,r .r ,loan N uI cwc1M. mrtn�mc. m. y.etls, Ir ..Ie y�Tl.nr CONDITIONS cmw1-1 11 ,R .r m. c.ne1I=*.*I —*Id,I, a d. eTMI .1 u:.1,'.1 i.m.:a a; 1 wwa,..id° °°'�",.,, 1.* F.. eLA- NOTES ,. 11...,..,I. .ixl« r . ,we A A.w.I ., —' 1. .-..m. d..ewt..w ...,..m. m.�,.M,. SURVEY FOR: EXACTA SURVEYING SERVICE LAURENCE F. DIXON, PLS Sonoma Development 9827 etn Nortneoet PO Box 572 SEAITLE. w 9e115 Bothell, INA 98041 ,De P. , ARLA (205) 365-w7o HMM I AUgcet 15. 200 1' . zo' I i 1�� I I I V NONTN GRAPHIC SCALE `(« 7En n20 N. W' M7, 50' SE 1 1/4, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RA' 3 EAST, W.M. I _ \ 1 \ 7Jj \ 46 sE° :.=`x co«c k is'•11 a � ' � /� a,r�cv .3�Ja 1.81' 8 gJ. Y3. \ I / / / I / LEGEND Mu;J N 89i5'10• E 706.39' T, bola .2:2 5'Op 6 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ................... SURVEYOR'S CERnFICATE ... ..•.•••••:... ••"'��E, •ar . SURVEY FOR: EXACTA SURVEYING SERVICE NM !e/ .acne IN. Goy «1 70 of N Al —IECTLIKt.KOaaalN LAURENCE F. DIXON, PLS N ao9a F._ at al the 1 .1 KA «c Ac�wl nK MEAQ1E51 •�"� Sonoma Development PO Box 5572 9827 eU Nwm.a.!L.aWc _EON . PPP SEAME, WA 98115 (708) x5-0670 yy`,� Bothell, WA 98041 ,oe R .—A .......... N .... 9.. s«al. a! R.mm - Nuu Avwae 1s. 7om r � 70• NO EXCISE AX REQUIRED JUL 1 5' 2003 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: BOB OANTINI, Soohomin County treasurer Publicutllity, District No. IofSnohomish County By BOB DANTINI Attn: Real Estate Services - 04 P.O. Box 1107 Everet4 WA 98206 200307151 03:54PM $20.00 p7-15-2003 SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON o � 1180 (Rev. 3/92) / DISTRIBUTION EASEMENT E- S(o O Underground SW 36(27-3) (335101-06)7020-4592 THIS INDENTURE made this /L day of Ml mE 2003, between SONOMA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC a Washlnaton corporation hereinafter referred to as Grantor, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, and Verizon Northwest Inc. , hereinafter referred to as Grantee; and hereinafter referred to as Mortgagee, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of certain real property ("Property' herein) In the County of Snohomish , State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 2 through 4. City of Edmonds Short Plat No. SPS-2000-82, recorded under Auditor's File Number 200301175001, being a portion of that certain Short Plat recorded under Auditor's File Number 200108225006, all records of Snohomish County, Washington; BEING a portion of the Southwest Ouarter of Section 36, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M. Tax Parcel No. 00556000004700 AND WHEREAS, the Grantee is desirous of acquiring certain rights and privileges across, under and upon said Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys and grants to Grantee, its agents, contractors, successors and assigns, the perpetual right, privilege, and authority to construct, erect, alter, improve, extend, repair, operate, and maintain underground electric distribution line facilities consisting of conduits, cables, lines, vaults, switches and transformers, communication lines, fiber optic cables• semi -burled and ground mounted facilities and pads and any other necessary or convenient appurtenances, across, under and upon that portion of the Property ("Easement Area" herein) described as follows situated in the County of Snohomish , State of Washington, to -wit: Easement Area No. 1: All streets and road right of ways as now or hereinafter designed, platted, and/or constructed within the above -described property. When said streets and road right of ways are dedicated to the public for road purposes this Easement Area No.1 shall become null and void. Easement Area No. 2: An easement area 10 feet in width across all lots, tracts and spaces located within the above -described property being parallel to and coincident with the boundaries of all privatetpublic street and road right of ways. Together with the right of ingress to and egress from said easement area across adjacent lands of the Grantor, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, repairing, renewing, altering, changing, patrolling and operating said facilities, and the right at any time to remove said facilities from said lands. Also the right at all times to cut and/or trim all brush, timber, trees or other growth standing or growing upon the property of Grantor which, in the opinion of Grantee, is necessary for the operation and maintenance of Grantee's facilities and/or constitute a menace or danger to said facilities or to persons or property by reason of proximity to said line. Grantor and the heirs, successors, or assigns of Grantor hereby covenant and agree not to construct or permit to be constructed any structures of any kind on the easement area without approval of the District. The Grantor and the heirs, successors or assigns of Grantor covenant and agree not to do any blasting or discharge any explosives within a distance of three hundred (300) feet of said line without giving reasonable notice in writing to the Grantee, its successors or assigns, of intention so to do. • The rights, title, privileges and authority hereby granted shall continue to be in force until such time as the Grantee, its successors or assigns, shall permanently remove said facilities and appurtenances from said lands, or shall otherwise permanently abandon said line, at which time all such rights, title, privileges and authority hereby granted shall terminate. The Grantor also covenants to and with the Grantee that Grantor Is lawfully seized and possessed of land aforesaid; has a good and lawful right and power to sell and convey same; that same are free and clear of encumbrances, except as above Indicated; and that Grantor will forever warrant and defend the title to said easement and the quiet possession thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever. Any mortgage on said land held by the Mortgagee is hereby subordinated to the rights herein granted to the Grantee, but in all other respects the said mortgage shall remain unimpaired. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed the day and year first above written. Please sign and have notarized below (REPRESENTATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT) State of Washtngton County of /< .' n a I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _'5R A RO fv 4, Pm / w, a no P signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the l�4' � r--A1,1 .tits __ -_-p of (OFFMI-MANAGING PARTNER ETC.) SONOMA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC. to be the free and voluntary act (LLC. CORPORATION ETC.) for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument. A. - ���•�`�gP,GTiILAf0 z, v.QpvM EY!'• •� Dated Signature of b) ; FEB. Notary Public *�a ";*� Title Notary Public 1 2008 ,�: My appointment expires • 200307220296 3 FIGS 07-22-2003 10:59am $21.00 RETIMMADDOM: SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Attn: ROW Department IWO E•Q.ia4AWle - 1% A2.1g, r LJ,o ?9M EASEMENT (customer form) • NO r-Y"1SE TAX ;ftc�6=q JUL. 2 2 2003 BOB DAiNmil, j WUUlnall ouwirl Irea,Surel By BOB DANTINI REFERENCE#: GRANTOR: SoAa+ry DslnccePn�n. CuraaY.• GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL:/ass Z,36'1, Condseac SP Szeoo.9*- see full legal on paged ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: aoasb-oao.ov? OP or U MAP NO: SW36-2703 JOB NO: /090/603/S' FILE: 4ST5*9 For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid -SDwoN%A Deist ommyr- AT 1.✓OC".A> os►no.�.rn.. ("Grantor' herein), its successors and assigns hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ("Grantee' herein), its successors and assigns for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along, across and through the following described real property ('Property' herein) in s[N County, Washington: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. EASEMENT LOCATION: Except as may be otherwise set forth herein, Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property (the "Easement Area" herein) that is ten (10) feet in width having five (5) feel of such width on each side of the centerline of Grantee's systems located as constructed or to be constructed, extended or relocated on the Property except those portions of the Property occupied by existing building footings, foundations, and/or subsurface structures. 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the right to use the Easement Area to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, remove, and enlarge one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity. Together with the right of access over and across said Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. As used herein, the tern 'systems' shall include all appurtenances and facilities as ara necessary•, in the judgment of Grantee, for the opera:ion and maintenance of said systems. 2. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor agrees not to erect any structures on said Easement Area, and further agrees not to place trees, rockeries, fences or other obstructions on the Property that would interfere with the exercise of Grantee's rights herein. DATED this Z(o day of L _ 2003. GRANTOR: BY: iAfiQ.t [7w a�Cf-t.Ciw..Tr�, NOTE: SIGNATURES ARE REOUflED OF ALL CO -OWNERS OF PROPERTY BY: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2003, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individual(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires Naary seal. tog and all notations must be inside 1' mmglns STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2003, before me, a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the individual(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposed therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Notary seal, tea and ali notations must be In51ds 1' marpins My appointment expires (CORPORATE ACIWOWLEDGMENn STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF ) On this 16_ day of _ M A y , 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared _WA&C nu h. : /.ti, a e to me known to be the person who signed as V. e a PRcs -',ac avi of ',9riwCiM A b 2 m..++. the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of 15 (- 0 for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that was authorized to execute the said Instrument on behalf of said 56narnt% Dlytfvn.ae n/. To — IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and (ficial seal t e day end year first above written. V�.Qp�NZ�ENlF9AN W- �g r (Print or stamp name of Notary) FEB. NOTARY PULI 'n a fort fate of W shin ton, *'; 2008 •esiding at - fte tot+ My appointment expires Notarysed, tttiettll ions mud ttt�ta 1�tpin$ ( SINGLE REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2003, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me known to be the individual(s) who signed as of , the that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that was authorized to execute the said instrument on behalf of said IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my had and official seal the day and year first above written. (Print or stamp name of Notary) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires Notary seed, tea and all notations nest be Inside t' margins Cust form U2000 U EXHIBIT "A" Lots 2, 3 and 4 of City of Edmonds Short Plat No. SP S-2000-82, recorded under Snohomish County Recording No. 200301175001, records of Snohomish County, Washington, Being a portion of Lots 47 and 48, RICHMOND PARK, Division 2 as recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 12 Records of Snohomish County, Washington, located in a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 36, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M. D+ 1 i VOL �805' n*294 Page-...1 _ PART A-., PREAMBLE On this •twenty -Be corid,'day of October, 1956, for the purpose of protect ing the following described real property situate in the State of Washington, County of Snohomish, and more particularly described as follows'to Wit: Lots Forty-three (.43) through Fifty-four (54) inclusive, all in Richmond Park Homes.Division No. 2, recorded in volume 14 of Deeds on pages 11 and 12, records of Snohomish County, Washington. PART.B. AREA OF APPLICATION: B-1 Fully Protected Residential Area. The residential area covenants in Part C in their entirety shall apply to each and every lot and block in said Addition. PART C. RESIDENTIAL AREA COVENANTS. C-1 Land Use and Building Type. i":No lot shall be used except fcr residential purposes. No build- ing shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed one and one-half stories in height and a private garage for not more than two cars. C-2' Dwelling Cost, Quality and Size. No dwelling shall be permitted on any lot at a cost of less than $14,000.00 based upon cost levels prevailing on the date these covenants are recorded, nor unless the ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of one story open porches and garages be not less than 1200 square feet for a one story dwelling, nor less than 1100 square feet for a dwelling of more than one story. C-3 Building Location. No building..,shall,be located on any lot nearer than 20 feet to the front lot- 11hei. No .uilding shall be located on any lot nearer than 10 feet to any sidelstreet line. No.building shall be located nearer t .a 5 : feet tos a . ida'";�uof lire, . except that no side yard shall be- required for a gara"off;otfier,permittad accessory building located .50 feet or more , from tHs. t li m .building -setback line, as .h9rein specified. No eliaila;be°;;located:,gn any interior lot nearer than, 30f toot to the rear lob ldne�... Por f w purposes of this covenant, 4r'' ea -wile sbe -and opon, Y'1. not:b ; ponsidered as a part of a . �. 'building. f �y xiue • 't.�tat_ �''.i' . '' _,. "i i' Vic: ���' C-4 Easements. Easements for installation and maintenance drainage facilities are reserved as shown on the C-5 Nuisances. No `noxious or:: offensive activity shall be %:arried on upon any nor::shall anything�be done thereon which maybe cr may become an annoy- ance•...or. nuisance to the neighborhood. C-6 Temporary Structures. of utilities and recorded plat. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. C-7 Signs. No signs of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one square foot, one sign of not more than five square feet advertising the property for sale or rent, or signs used by a builder to advertise the property during the. construction and sales period. C-8 Livestock and Poultry. No animals, livestock, or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose.. C-9 Garbage and Refuse Disposal. No lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage, or other waste shall not be kept except in sanitary containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition. C-10 Water Supply. No individual water -supply system shall be permitted on any lot unless such system is located, constructed and equipped in accordance; with requirements, standard and recommendations of the Snohomish County, Washington, Department of Health. C-11 Sight Distance at Intersection. No fence, hedge or shrub planting which obstructs sightlines at elevations between two and six feet abova the roadways shall be placed or permitted to remain on any corner lot within the triangular area formed by the street property lines and a line connecting them at points 25 feet tray the intersection of tom. street lines, or in the... case.�:of a rounded property corner from thb,intersection of the street property lines extended. `Zhe same eight line limitations shall apply to any lot within 10 feet from the intersection of a street property line with the edge of a driveway or alley pavement. No tree shall be permitted to remain within such distance of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at sufficient height to prevent obstruc- tion of such sight lines. C-12 Sewage Disposal. No individual sewage -disposal system shall be permitted on any lot unless such system is designed; located and constructed in accord- ance with the requirements, standards and recommendations of the Snohomish County, Washington, Department of Health. PART*D GENERAL PROVISIONS D-1 Term. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of 25 years -from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of 10 years unless an instrument signed by a majority of the then owners of the lots has been recordedr agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part. The purchase of any lot in this subdivision shall constitute an agreement on the part of such purchaser to be bound by these protective covenants in their entirety and to abide by the same. D-2 Enforcement. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damages. D-3 Severability. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. jj.,, �yy -f vt �A4i.'k 0 VIDU MJt Pa crM in AXEL WICK&MA4 by "m aw—a'-w . fact. WATH OF ............... County of ................anchom ......Ish .................... On this..A?# ............. day of.. -qqW'?!!rA ......................... A. 1). nit!. this tinder. Aped. a Notary Public in and for the NW. ...................... . Itily and stworn. personally appeared .... ............... ....................... ...... . to me known to be the Individual dewrilied in i and who exerlited the foregoing for its; t .. .. .. ........... ................... �...self and as attorney In fa4 also therein described. and acknowledged to me that signed • allof seated the mime aot ....... her ......... voluntary act and de -I nod UK the frove and volmmiry art and of the Said thellsell, 111141 till APILM4919-40....................................................for and an oath stated that the power of all-WilPY 101thotriving the of this i-velfill-All has •notbelen.revoked and that the tiaid ...... ... .. ...... -al hereto aflixi-ol lilt. tlay nod ye-ir it, 'lots WnNWS my hand and t)rficial so aboVe,mritten. .......... N-AAMPUldir in and f'.r tit.. So n mui.lvnmz at. Mt. (Ackgowatedigooment by Sooff mW as Attomv3o it, Vitro. WmAinsalai 111 Ir ltl,uTR'hN' I f" t is' TUso is eacolacc: �LanC asa Date: 5/18/04 FIELD REPORT Page: IofI Owner: Firstline Construction, Inc. File #: FIR1-01 Purpose of visit: Foundation inspection Weather: Sunny I arrived at the site at 1:15 pm. Project: 10308 - 242"d Place SW Permit #: 2004-0349 Field report #: 2 Prepared by: Donald W. Tubbs The foundation excavations are complete. The floor of the foundation excavation is directly underlain by native soils consisting of glacial outwash sand. The soils within the footing areas have been compacted using hand -operated vibratory compaction equipment. I probed the soils within the foundation area using a half -inch steep probe, and observed that the native soils have been compacted to a dense condition. The compacted soils within the foundation area were verified as suitable for the design bearing value of 2000 psf provided in our geotechnical report dated January 9, 2004. I left the site at 1:45 pm. Attachments: Distribution: CEIV F� DEVQ,0fMENT k43VICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Signed: RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2004 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washi 4L5-tStfL-4tS5U WWW 2. a A DECEIVED 1 f TUBBSO DDD o"O DDD MAR - 8 2004 PERMIT COUNTER Firstlire rcinst.-W- 7.uii, Inc. 16605 - 71st Place West Edmonds, Washington 98037 ti p January 9, 2004 Geotechnical Engineering Report Residential Property 10300 Block of 242nd Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. HAL2-01 INTRODUCTION This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical conditions pertinent to proposed residential development of your property located in the 10300 block of 242°1 Place West in Edmonds, Washington. Our services have been performed at your request and in accordance with our services agreement dated December 16, 2003. The subject property consists of Lots 2 and 3 of Short Subdivision S-2000-82. We understand that you propose to develop the property to include two single family residences. You have asked us to evaluate geotechnical conditions within the property as a basis for providing you with information and recommendations pertinent to the proposed development. Specifically, our scope of services includes: 1. Review of published geologic and topographic information regarding the subject site and adjacent areas. 2. Surface geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas. 3. Subsurface investigation of soil conditions at the site by means of test pits excavated by a backhoe and operator you provided. 4. Preparation of this geotechnical engineering report providing our observations relative to geotechnical conditions at the site and providing our conclusions and recommendations regarding geotechnical elements of the proposed development. Our services have been provided on the basis of a review of existing information available to us, geologic reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas during December 2003, observation of test pit explorations on December 19, 2003, discussions with you and Mr. Gary S. Cooper, and our experience. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 2 SITE CONDITIONS The property is located between 1040' Avenue West and 242"d Place SW in Edmonds, Washington as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. As shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2, which is based on a drawing dated 4-2-02 by JBMF Consulting Engineers, the subject property consists of a Lots 2 and 3, located in the southeastern part of the shortplat and accessed via 242"d Place SW. Our Critical Areas Evaluation report dated April 10, 2002 for the area of the short plat that includes the subject property, described topographic, vegetative and prior development conditions within the area of the short plat. Since that report was submitted, the area of the short plat has been cleared and graded to create three building pads, driveways accessing the three lots have been constructed and paved, and storm and sanitary side sewers have been installed. Site grading included construction of a keystone block wall and two rockeries. Recommendations for design and construction of these improvements was not included in either our previous or present scope of services. We understand that the existing rockeries will be reconstructed based on recommendations by others. Geologic conditions within the area of the short plat were also described in our earlier report. As part of our present services we explored subsurface conditions within the area of the short plat via six test pits, including four test pits within the subject property, excavated at the locations indicated on the Site Plan. A description of the subsurface exploration program and the logs of the test pits are presented in the Appendix. The observed subsurface conditions are consistent with those described in our earlier report. The subject property is underlainby glacial outwash consisting of sand and gravel deposited during the advance and retreat of the last glacier to occupy this area some 13,500 to 15,000 years ago. Local patches of glacial till, deposited directly by the glacial ice, exist within the area of the short plat but none was observed within the subject property. Some fill locally exists within the site. Because of the high infiltration capacity of the surficial soils, little or no surface water runoff occurs within the site, and no emergent groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, on the slope adjacent to 104' Avenue West, or elsewhere within the site. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com 1 Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The subject property is suitable for the proposed residential development provided that proper site development procedures and the recommendations below are followed. The native soils underlying the site consist of glacial outwash sand and are suitable for conventional residential foundation design and construction procedures. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK We recommend that all sod; organic soil, fill and debris be removed from settlement sensitive areas (e.g., building, pavement and slab areas). The subgrade surface in slab and pavement areas should be proof -rolled with heavy rubber -tired equipment after excavating to the desired grade. The purpose of the proof -rolling is to bring the near -surface soils to a uniform density and to identify any loose areas which might require recompaction or removal and replacement with structural. fill. Temporary cut slopes for foundation excavations are expected to be as much as ten feet in height. Temporary cut slopes in the medium dense to dense native soils may be inclined as steeply as 1H:1 V and, except for minor sloughing, can be expected to stand at that inclination for a period of several weeks if protected from drying. Temporary cut slopes in existing loose or fill soils may be inclined as steeply as 1.5H:1 V if protected from drying. Protection from drying applies to natural soil moisture only. Do not add water to temporary cut slopes to improve stability. If steeper temporary cut slopes are required we should be consulted to develop shoring recommendations. We understand that you anticipate a permanent cut slope up to 8 feet in height within the eastern portion of the subject property, and two -tiered rockery wall for erosion protection of that slope. If rockery walls are used for this purpose, we recommend that each wall be no more than 4 feet in height, and that the toe of the rockeries (see Figure 3) be located above a plane sloping 45 degrees downward from the adjacent property line. If higher cut slopes are required we should be consulted to provide other recommendations for slope protection. STRUCTURAL FILL All new fill in settlement -sensitive areas shall be placed as compacted structural fill after the site has been prepared as described above. All structural fill material shall be free of debris, organic contaminants and rock fragments larger than 6 inches. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 4 increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult to achieve. Structural fill shall contain no more than 5 percent fines for placement in wet weather. The percent fines can be higher for placement in dry weather, providing that the fill material is moisture -conditioned as necessary for proper compaction. The sandy native outwash soils at the site are suitable for structural fill. Structural fill placed in building or pavement areas shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. Utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent, except for the upper 2 feet which shall be compacted to 95 percent. We recommend that structural fill be placed in loose layers not more than 8 inches thick if a small vibratory roller compactor is used (or not more than 12 inches if a 10-ton or larger vibratory roller compactor is used), conditioned to the proper moisture content for compaction, and uniformly compacted before placing subsequent layers. FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed residence can be supported on conventional spread and strip footings founded on firm native soil, or can be supported on structural fill directly overlying firm native soil. Footings may be proportioned using an allowable bearing value of 2000 pounds per square foot. This value applies to the total of dead plus long term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering design loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. This value also assumes a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous spread footings and 24 inches for isolated spread footings. The minimum depth of embedment below final adjacent grades is 18 inches for exterior footings and 12 inches for interior footings on firm native soil. Footings adjacent to a downhill slope shall be sufficiently deep to provide at least 6 feet of horizontal separation between the footing and the slope face, and shall be sufficiently deep or distant from the slope that a 1:1 plane extended from the edge of the footing does not intersect the slope face. Because local areas of loose soil may be encountered at the same level as the medium dense to dense soils, we recommend that the soils beneath the footings be compacted using hand operated vibratory equipment in lifts as described above. Any loose or disturbed soils in the footing excavations, including any test pit backfill, should be recompacted prior to concrete placement. Floor slabs can be supported on grade if site preparation is accomplished as previously recommended, or can be supported by structural fill directly overlying firm native 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 5 soil. The subgrade soils should be proof -rolled as recommended above and compacted using vibratory equipment or replaced with compacted structural fill if loose areas are observed. A base course layer consisting of a minimum thickness of 4 inches of clean gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines should be placed beneath the floor slab to provide uniform support and a capillary break. FOUNDATION RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and shall be designed as such. Assuming that the walls that are allowed to deflect 0.01 times the height of the wall, we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 2H:1 V percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 60 pcf should be used. Resistance to lateral footing loads can be developed both through friction on the base of the footings and passive pressures along the sides. Friction resistance on the base of the footing be computed using an internal soil friction angle of 30 degrees. Passive soil pressures may be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot, providing the backfill around footings is compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). These resistance values include a factor of safety of about 1.5. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free - draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting structural elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 3 feet of the retaining walls; no compaction tests will be necessary within 3 feet of the walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth -wall, 4-inch-diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe, nonwoven filter fabric such as Mirafi drainage product or equal, and surrounded by pea gravel or well -graded gravelly sand or sandy gravel with less than 3 percent fines (soil finer than the No. 200 mesh sieve) based on the fraction smaller than 3/4 inch. The drainpipes should discharge into tightlines sloped to drain by gravity to the existing storm sewer system. Roof drains shall not discharge into the footing drain system. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 6 SITE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL We understand that the City of Edmonds requires water to be routed through an on - site infiltration trench prior to being conveyed to the storm sewer system. We recommend that the bottom of the infiltration trench be sufficiently deep and distant from any adjacent downhill slopes so as to meet the setback requirements specified above for footings. We recommend that water from footing drains be routed directly to the storm sewer via a tight line. If the footing drains must be routed through the infiltration trench, the outlet from the infiltration trench to the storm sewer shall be at an elevation at least 3 feet lower than the footing drains in order to avoid the possibility of water from roof drains backing up into the footing drain system. The surficial soils within the subject property are susceptible to potential erosion and shallow debris slides if disturbed by construction or other activities. Erosion controls are therefore recommended, including the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt revegetation. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for Firstline Construction, Inc. and its representatives for use in planning, permitting and designing residential development of Lots 2 and 3. Descriptions of subsurface conditions relative to foundation support and other aspects of the proposed development are based on surface observations and shallow subsurface explorations, and conditions should be confirmed by observations in the excavations at the time of. construction. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have .been accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical practices followed in this area at the time the report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, should be understood. 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www;tubbs.com Firstline Construction, Inc. January 9, 2004 Page 7 We trust that this report meets your present needs. If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. /ors w ash 0 7 Ce 7567�� �Sed Donald W. Tubbs '0 24330 �v ON IA EXPIRES: 12/24/04 Document ID: HAL.201R1 Yours very truly, Tubbs Geosciences Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Engineering Geologist Enayat S. Aziz, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering consultant to Tubbs Geosciences 7505-A West Lake Sammamish Parkway Northeast Redmond, Washington 98052 425-882-4850 www.tubbs.com 4, niv �.�:- �,. - � � Fie ur ; �_� .. � • ' 1-Tank 1Q _• ' • �s �[[, a t? it i i' 1 0 ,• ■. .•��� `:� i • `—tom; — .1' � �{``'-''• .�,`� f .. ` f • '� ' � SITE �• � � � r .. .��: ■ ii SH AL 9' L` • s 1 1 ' • ' 1 VICINITY MAP TUBBSOOM aMOSO FIGURE 1 GRAPHIC SCALE r �■ nw--�ox�-- ev++o.r� (w rceT) r; ' rCP d-1 � M P%. —d t re�re p. 1 N .�,rc \ -.� �•` fin, no ' ,i •: 1/ �ii) is ,A art f��z , <� . VARIABLE G:I BATTER 4 / 46 a' MIN.THICKNE96 4 V QUARRY 5AkLL5 / D y Q • I ' > r0 I w 1''MINUS WASHED ROCK AS NEEDED I FILTER. FABRIC AS NEEDED ORIGINAL GROUND I I Ir I G' PERF PIPE AS NEEDED FDR SUBSURFACE WATER. EXCAVATION ONL`( Rockery walls shall be constructed of rocks in the following size categories: Two -man rocks (300 to 600 pounds), 13" in least dimension; Three-man rocks (800 to 1200 pounds), 16" in least dimension; Four -man rocks (1500 to 2200 pounds), 18 " in least dimension. The rock material shall be hard, sound, durable and free from weathered portions, seams, cracks, and other defects. Rocks should be as tabular in shape as possible; rounded or very angular rocks shall be avoided. The larger rocks shall be placed at the base of the wall. Four -man rocks shall be used for the bottom course in walls higher than 6 feet. The lowest course of rocks shall be keyed into firm foundation material at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade. Rocks shall be selected and placed to minimize void space between rocks. Rocks shall be placed in a manner such that the tong axis of the rock is normal to the face of the wall. To the greatest extent possible, rocks shall be placed with faces in contact; point contact shall be avoided. Inclining interfaces between rocks shall slope downward toward the back of the wall. After setting each course of rock, voids between the rocks shall be chinked on the back with quarry rock to eliminate any voids larger than two inches across. TUBBSC�OOO OD OMO M ROCKERY WALL SCHEMATIC FIGURE 3 APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS The subsurface conditions within the subject site and adjacent areas were explored by excavating six test pits with a track -mounted backhoe on December 19, 2003. The test.pit locations are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. The locations are approximate and were estimated in the field based on site features shown on the Site Plan. The explorations were backfilled with the excavated material and compacted with the backhoe bucket. The test pits were continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm who observed the materials encountered, noted ground water conditions and maintained a detailed log of each exploration. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the classification system shown in Figure A-1. The test pit logs are presented in Figures A-2 through A-3. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GROUP NAME GRAVEL CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL SOILS More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL on No. 4 Sieve SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve SP POORLY -GRADED SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES SC CLAYEY SAND No. 4 Sieve FINE SILT AND CLAY ML SILT GRAINED INORGANIC SOILS CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More Than 50% INORGANIC Passes CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or More HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM TUBBSUS 0C OC 092 FIGURE A-1 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) 0-1.0 1.0 - 4.0 4.0 - 5.0 5.0 - 7.0 7.0 - 9.0 0-0.5 0.5 - 1.5 1.5 - 3.5 3.5 - 5.5 SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL SP SM SP SM SP SM SP SP SM DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP-1 Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash] Gray silty sand with some gravel (very dense, damp) (Vachon till] Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt (very dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-2 Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] Brownish gray gravelly sand with trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] Gray sand with some gravel, trace of silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 5.5 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBSO&DOC� �C�C OSO FIGURE A-2 LOG OF TEST PIT I DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP-3 0 - 2.5 SP Brown sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots, some construction debris (loose, damp) [fill] 2.5 - 3.5 SP Gray sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots, some construction debris (medium dense, damp) [fill] 3.5 - 4.0 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] 4.0 - 7.0 SM Medium brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional ourwash] 7.0 - 9.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-4 0 - 0.5 SP Dark brown sand with some gravel, some silt, some roots (loose, damp) [topsoil] 6.0 - 3.0 SP Brownish gray sand with trace of gravel, some silt, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 3.0 - 6.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some gravel, some silt, trace of roots (very dense, damp) [Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBSC�C�O�C� FIGURE A-3 LOG OF TEST PIT I DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FEET) SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT TP-5 0 - 3.5 SM Dark brown silty sand with some gravel, some roots (medium dense, damp) [fill] 3.5 -4.5 SM Reddish brown silty sand with trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recessional outwash] 4.5 - 7.0 SP Medium brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel, trace of roots (medium dense, damp) [Vachon recesssional outwash] Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed TEST PIT TP-6 0 - 1.0 SM Medium grayish brown silty sand with some gravel, trace of roots (dense, damp) [fill] 1.0 - 2.0 SM Dark brown silty sand with trace of gravel, some roots ( medium dense, damp) [buried topsoil] 2.0 - 6.0 SP Medium grayish brown sand with some silt, trace of gravel (medium dense, damp) [Vashon recessional outwash] 6.0 - 7.0 SP Brownish gray sand with some silt, some gravel (dense to very dense, damp) (Vachon advance outwash] Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet on 12/19/03 No groundwater seepage observed DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, SHOWN TO 0.1 FOOT, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FOOT LOG OF TEST PIT TUBBS8(B DaC '08nC 81% FIGURE A-4 COPY ;" `� • 3b4. oo 3 a � — 1. _...... m Owner: Firstline Construction �- J— — — — — — — , 'f 0 Address: 944 Maple ST. W �O Edmonds Wa. 98020 0��_I _SpCK.Gt`t Ph. (206) 498-5339 ..°5�`i Q L1NE of lax Parcel : OOSS56-000-047-01 O M b6c.VC s r— roperty Address: 10308 242°d PL . S.W. Edmonds Wa. 98020 v �lr �� 3 � t�h `d � � P�rTlo •�I - Z • t Sri 6a 92_o0 40R412 60 3 �o� �0-.� LOT COVERAGE o LOT AREA =8953 S.F. �0SOCK RY M HOUSE & DECKS - 2505 S.F. �. COVERAGE 2505/8953 = 28.01% 1.�t:ST F�cTING C-A 10, IMPERVIOUS SURFACES HOUSE, EAVES & PATIO -2680 S.F. i �1 �, 371.Sd DRIVEWAY & WALKS = 634 S.F. 3 I TOTAL = 3314 S.F. �Ry \ / be • �3v8. oo WAL.K • pz 4F .oc r qq 34$.oa ads Con.f4oG l9 g C t0 � -cS Or HEIl:H7' CALCS IV �' CL Avg. Grade q3 -S. 0 i �¢$,-� P` Actual Maximum = -- t � SETBACKS: s; tf RECEIVED FRONT I �' SIDE. 3 .. APR 1 92004 :. �� OT PLAN �. \ 'qp c C `-1v - ` :. REAR- : c. le: 1/8 = I Foot ` \`0g� lr�,ll s ��.. PERMIT COUNTER OTHER HEIGHT aIt' IC)