The URL can be used to link to this page

15605 75TH PL W.PDFlillIIII 111111116042 15605 75TH PL W 0 ADDRESS: 5- Al, W TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 57 3 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: 2O00I v .3 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver XStudy Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #' DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: l_� wtwr PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: /0 `&--N SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: &5, 9y GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LID #: LOT: BLOCK: LATEMPIDST's\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc C ILE NO. '; ' Atical Areas Checklist ---------------- ---------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 1") (-09 22 WKJ 2. Property Tax Account Number: 3. Approximate. Site Size (acres or square fet): 4. Is this site currently developed? /yes; no. If yes; how is site developed?,C,`�i'i`Id�1 �, �J� 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. . Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs ;mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: . For City City Staff Use Only--------------...--_..._.—w...:._: 1 Site is Zoned?2� i2. SCS mapped soil type(s)? r J 4 ow 6 �G Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? 4. Critical Areas inventory or. C.A. map; indicates Critical Area on site? :5. Site within designated earth subsidence'landslide hazard area? ��5//��Q 6. Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? .W,4 � 1-62 9012AU, !R* DETERMINATION ,- STUDY 00UIRED CONDITIONAL. WAIVER. WAIVE Reviewed by: Planner f /U Date . . "a cAkdoC Ra 10103M City of Edmonds CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name <— Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date c:rec eptionVanakeddoc Applicant Representative: Name Street Address ity State Zip Tel h ignature Date (over) City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Jamie Hawk Determination #: CA-2000-3 Project Name: I N/A Permit Number: I N/A Site Location: 15605 75th Place West Property Tax Acct #: 5131-000-024-04 Project Description: Non project specific Determination: Study Required Review of a topographic map and inspection of the subject site, found what appears to be a Steep Slope Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20.1513 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) towards the west (water side). Prior to submittal of building permit applications for any development activity, the following action must be taken: Steep Slope Hazard Area Delineation Requirements To determine the extent of a Steep Slope Hazard Area, a topographic survey of the property, prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor must be obtained. Any slope of 40% or more, with at least 20 feet of vertical rise will be classified as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. From the toe or top of the Steep Slope Hazard Area, a 50-foot buffer plus a 15-foot building setback is required. The survey is to confirm the presence of a Critical Area and locate the buffer and building setback as mandated by ECDC Chapter 20.15B. For development of any kind that is proposed within the, 50-foot buffer, the 15-foot building setback, or critical area itself, the following options may apply: 1. A licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer may provide evidence to demonstrate that a buffer alteration down to 10 feet plus a 15-foot buffer setback will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any private party. This effectively reduces the requirement from a total of 65 feet from the top or toe or slope down to 25 feet. A geotechnical analysis of the site and statements regarding the setback reduction and lack of adverse impact on the public is required prior to any development permit application. 2. If development must occur within the critical area, buffer and/or setback and is not identified as an exception, a variance or Reasonable Use Exception and variance pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B. may be possible. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Area located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Division for review. If the Planning Division finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. The site is identified on the City of Edmonds Environmentally Sensitive Map. SEPA review will be required of all development applications or permits. This property is also subject to the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard section of the Edmonds Co ity D velo ment C (ECDC Section 19.05).. Karissa Kawamoto January 28, 2000 Name Date .t.q 189v January 31, 2000 Alice Andall 15605 75' PI. West Edmonds, WA 98026 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building • Engineering Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 2000-3 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. _... .. ....... _ _ . _ _ __ ..._.._ _.. _.... _. IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED. PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. y You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL 40 PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB• Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. c: Jaimie Hawk Enc: Critical Areas Determination • Architectural Design Board C: Reeeption\Jana\C R LT R.doo Thank you. Shada Graham Planning Secretary • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS ,TPUBLIC WORKS DEPART*T ,•- S7DE SEWER PERMIT U W w FOR IN T N CALL permit _ v00 o - 52 22Q Issue Date PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE i� 1. Address of Construction 2. Property Legal Description (include all easements) fk X L u 3. Single Family Residence I/ Multi -Family* No. of Units Commercial 4. Owner and/or Builder 5. Contractor & License No. 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (63'42b15%Ah before excavation) . 1=000-454-5555 7. Cross other private property: Yes No V"'� Easement required - attach legal description and county easement number. READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each installation for one year. C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") side sewer line. d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.150) and maximum grade of 100% (450). f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/81bend) is allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 450 (1/8 bend) and Wye with removable cap. g.. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice %required. DATE: I certify that I have read and shall comply with the above PERMIT FEE: 00 CONNECTION FEE: * PERMIT DISAPPROVED By: Date: Date: APPROVED By: Date: ZQ -26 •8 � 4SP. By R.NoLLANp 4 . T BE POSTED ON JOB SITE * �h. w J z 0 F 0' P4 O z U O �} H o P4 O H � � H A � a o z � a z a CEZ U V r s 3 OWNERSHIP NAME STMT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 77 AUDIT PTY 7#7 ------- ,0 • — — -24-81 7 MEADOWDALE BEACH CASCADE SAVINGS E LOAN BLK 000 D-1C TH PTN TR 21 OAF MCROBERTS C NEIL 5501272E BEG NW COR TR 21 TH S03*44 09E .160.26FT _ 2828 COLBY TH N89*34 17E '30F.T...7PB_TH .CCNT:: N8934 EVERETT WA 98201 17E '146.66FT TH S01*2.6:.:42W 84.06FT TH S03*46 .:15E' 20.03FT 'TH S89*34 17W s 139.07FT TH NO3*44 09W 104.18FT LEWICKI PETER S PS MEADOWDALE BEACH BLK.000 D-01 - icv ut.Avc rvHf JV11.c 1010 OCV Jln VUIN, .1r1..r1.IN. _IR L't. LT z ur t.0 KU SEATTLE WA 98101 TH N ALG E LN CCU RD 82FT TO TPB TH CONT NLY ALG SD RD 60FT TH ELY PLL TC S BOY SD TR 120FT TH SLY PLL TO CO RD 60FT TH WLY PLL TO S BOY TR 120FT TO TPB_ 5131-000-024-0201 128813-81 .22 MEADCWDALE BEACH _SEAF_IRST MORTGAGE CORP MADEN RICHARD 0 9.15356-0 BLK.000D-02 T�BEG SW CDR CF TH FTN TR 24 LY E OF CO — 4TH & BLAlNCHA,RD BLDG RD TH N .4LG E LN CO RD 17FT TO TPB TH SEATTLE 'WA S8121 CONT N �LG SO RD 65FT TH ELY PLT S BOY SD TR 120FT TH SLY PLT CC RD 65FT TH WLY j PLT S BOY.12OFT TO TPB — 71 —_ 0 — `2 —03 28812-81 22 MEADOWDALE BEACH SEAFIRST MORTGAGE CORP BLK 000 0-03 — j MADEN RICHARC 0 915356-01 BEG SW CCR TH PTN TR 24 LY E CF CC RD ! 4TH C ELANCHR.0 BLDG TPB TH F;. AtG CC RD 17FT TH E PLT S BOY z�tA i : LL- WA 96121 1ZUF T TH 5 PLT CC RU 17FT TH W ON S BOY TR 120FT TPE sue, a,i 5131-000-024-0-09 14;] ANDAHL ST:ANLEY !4 3,i 15605 — 75TH PL W I' EDMONDS W }61 I 5131-000-02--0508 91608-56 9SC20 MEADC114DALE BEACH BLK 000 BEG NW CCR TH PTN TR 24 LY E OF CC RD TPBTH E CN N BOY 1.2O FT TH S PLT E MGN CO RD 122FT TH W PLT S BCY SO LOT 120FT TH NLY ON E `1GN CC RD 122FT N/L TO POB _MEADOWDALE BEACH CARLSUN TORKJEL BLK 000 0-05 — TR 24 LY W OF CC RD 125 LEE ST SEATTLE WA 98109 — 513 1-00—024-0607 121566-79 MEADOWDALE BEACH s; RUSNAK M ICHAEL & BETTY BLK C00 D-06 3y 15620 2NC- AVENUE WLST E 436FT OF c 100FT TR 24 so, EDMONDS) 14A 93020 6 12/20/56—N S S E S S 0 R S N: C H: 0 M I S-- C 0 U R E A L P_R 0 P E- R T Y R 0 �j !--------------,--------�—�-------MT--------LEGAL DESCRIPTI_CN----�----------- I. GWNERSHIP NAME_ ST — , A U C I T P TY -------------------- i �—c�G;—J2--:9.70E 55722-72--MEADOWDMUE BEACH & �I� E MN 90110 ING JILUIZA • • • Z N w O Z j < O y � a F � y N J Z W> W Z y W W V) o° U ° • N W s (n W N cc a z LU 0 a y a 3 W 3 7 Z W Uj • • • N Z N c� O W o W W F W a vn Z N Z c5?o Z Z P YLU O W � U ~ _M ~ Z Q LU U • z°_j ~ W UjU. Z o -a a gZ X W W p U Z N � � W mJ o N o • • • iUN.-2 1997 CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 page 1 of 3 pages CLIENT : Alice Andahl STREET F.ILE 7516 Ea9lefield Drive Arlington, Washington 98223 REFERENCE Andahl house located at 15605 75th Place W, Meadowdale SUBJECT : Investigation of slide and garage damage. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the . results of a geotechnical investigation of the slide and garage damage located at 15605 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds. The investigation and. report were authorized on 10 May 1997 by Alice Andahl, owner, during a conversation with Dale C. Hemphill of HEMPHILL CONSULTING ENGINEERS., INVESTIGATION HEMPHILL observed that the steep slope behind and north of the house had slid and collapsed the garage, damaging the contents including a car and boat..There was no evidence of damage to the house. The slide occurred on an unimproved extension of 156th Street. HEMPHILL climbed the slope and observed and tested the exposed soils, and determined that the remaining soils are hard and/or very dense and capable of standing at the steep slope. The soils that slid had become loosened by the weathering processes, which include wetting and drying, freezing and thawing, root action, direct rainfall, groundwater seepage, and uncontrolled or concentrated surface stormwater runoff. The most damaging to strong deeper soils on steep slopes is root action, usually from trees and mostly during heavy winds. The already loosened soils usually slide during or after a heavy rainfall where the excess water has increased the weight and softened the soils. 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST 9 BELLEVUE • WASHINGTON • 98008 • 206 6441080 rL 1 i PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 The excess water includes uncontrolled and/or concentrated surface runoff from the property above the slope. The excessive surface runoff often erodes the weakened soils, causing a flow slide that can be the most damaging to downhill properties because of the velocities achieved, and the distances that flow slides can travel. A neighbor claimed to have observed a pipe at the upper south end of the page 2 of 3 pages slide surface to be leaking and finally burst to release a large volume of water onto the slope prior to the slide. The source and volume of the water were not determined by HEMPHILL. The pipe has since been repaired. HEMPHILL observed three pipes at that location, two of which -were not properly anchored to prevent future failures. The third pipe conducts water' to an open catch basin at the base of the slope behind the Andahl house. CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS HEMPHILL concludes that the slide was composed of the upper weathered soils that had been saturated and eroded by an unprecedented natural ' occurrence, and by a broken pipe that was not properly installed. The remaining soils are strong and capable of standing until the upper surface again softens due to the weathering processes, which could be many years. The soils on adjacent slopes will probably slide before that occurrence. The soils on adjacent slopes exist at similar angles and possibly the same amount of weathering, therefore the broken pipe could have been the major factor causing the failure. Natural runoff from the upper property is directed toward . the undisturbed slope north of the slide. Other portions of the slope that did not slide have survived two unprecedented natural occurrences; the..heavy rainfall of a 5 day period that included a 100 year rainfall, on 8 February 1996, and the combination snowmelt/rainfall on 31 December 1996. Therefore the exposed surface of the slide area, and the adjacent slopes, are stable at least until the next unprecedented occurrence, or the failure of the pipes or other uncontrolled condition at the top of the slope. UrE-'BAEF. irIrL L PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 HEMPHILL concludes that the slide debris does not, retain any portion of the slope, and therefore can be removed from the lower areas around the north and east sides of the house. The damaged garage can be removed and replaced, and damage Dale C. Hemphill P.E. Registered Engineer No. 14777 State of Washington page 3 of 3 pages to the house, if any, can be repaired. There is no structural damage to the house, therefore the house can be occupied. There is no danger of damage from the existing debris, or slides from the upper slopes until another unprecedented occurrence. v� OF WAS�'� �t7 14777 O FCISIEi� 1�^V �SIONALE�G EXPIRES.17 FEBRUARY 1998 N j Im CITY OF EDMONDS - 121 Fifth Avenue North - Edmonds, WA 98020 Community Services Department• (206)771-0220 *FAX (206)771-0221 DATE: June 9. 1998 TO: Mark Bucklin Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, P.S. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4141 Seattle, WA 98104-3175 TRANSMITTING: Maintenance Logs from Street Division in response to Mezich Interrogatory #12 AS YOU REQUESTED: XX FOR YOUR FILE: XX FOR YOUR INFO: XX REVIEW & COMMENT: AS WE DISCUSSED: COMPLETE & RETURN: REMARKS I have enclosed the maintenance logs from the Street Division One copy is yours• the other goes with the Mezich interrogatory If you have any questions, please call me at (425) 771-0220, Ext..224. Thanks. ENGINEERING DIVISION ��— A. L LE CHRISMAN Engineering Specialist C:\My Documents\FORMS\Engnmg\TRANSLTR.DOC 6/9/98 f ``"`, �.s< mow'• CITY OF EDMONDS - 121 Fifth Avenue North - Edmonds, WA 98020 Community Services Department • (206) 771-0220 *FAX (206) 771-0221 DATE: May 11, 1998 TO: Mark Bucklin Keating, Bucklin & McCormack, P.S. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4141 Seattle, WA 98104 TRANSMITTING: INTERROGATORIES FOR ANDAHL & MEZICH AS YOU REQUESTED: XX I FOR YOUR FILE: FOR YOUR INFO: XX REVIEW & COMMENT: AS WE DISCUSSED: COMPLETE & RETURN: REMARKS Attached are our responses to the aforementioned interrogatories along with supporting documentation If you have any questions please call Lyle Chrisman at (425) 771-0220. Ext. 324. Some of our responses are enclosed in parentheses and are for your information only. ENGINEERING DIVISION AMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer Q\My Documents\FORMS\Engnmg\TRANSLTR.DOC 5/11/98 • Law Offices tTREET FILE ■ H I L L I S CLARK MARTIN & P E T E R S 0 N ■ A Professional Service Corporation 500 Galland Building, 1221 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-2925 (206) 623-1745 Facsimile (206) 623-7789 September 4, 1997 SFP eUl `0lN3 DE pi Ms. Jeannine Graf City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: 15605 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Graf: I 'am writing to thank you for the information you have recently provided regarding Building Permits and Earth Subsidence Area Permits. We may be calling you in the future for further information. In the meantime, this letter is simply to confirm that the owners of the above residence do not need a Building Permit to replace the door of the existing structure. We also understand that the replacement of the carport and garage attached to the residence will require a Building Permit. Very truly yours, Stephen H. Roos E-Mail: SHR@hcmp.com cc: Ms. Lori Andahl #68578 15851-2 IGWY0l LDOC NG) CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1301 5Tx AvENuE SurrE 1620 SEATTLE, WA 98101-2625 206-624-7863 r N.G. JACOBSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. August 19, 1997 Ms. Lori Andahl 20026 - 12th Drive S.E. Bothell, WA 98012 RE: ALICE ANDAHL RESIDENCE 15605 - 75TH PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WA PERMIT # 970546 NGJ # 9745.101 Dear Lori: CTREET FILE 8OLDING AUG 2 0 1997 Pursuant to your request, on Wednesday, August 13th, I inspected the visible structural framing adjacent to the front door and observed the existing structural wood header over the , door and adjacent studs, and found that the existing Structure appeared to not have been damaged from the mudslide damaging the front door, reported in our previous inspection. I recommend you proceed with the structural repairs with your Contractor. If your Contractor notes any unusual problems regarding the Structure, please feel free to call us again. Sincerely, N. G. JACOBSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. No an G. Jaco n, r., P.E., C GJ/gr cc: J. L. Graf, City of Edmonds Building Division, 121 -5th Ave. No. Edmonds, WA 98020 FAX 206-624-8947 rSt. 1 s9v CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering June 5, 1997 Mrs. Alice Andahl c/o Lori Andahl 20026 12th Drive Southeast Bothell, Washington 98012 RE: 15605 75th Place West, Edmonds BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR The City is in receipt of Hemphill Engineers field report dated 5/25/97 in response to our request for geotechnical review of ground movement at the subject property. In reviewing Hemphills report, the City will allow the accessory structure (garage) to be removed at the owner's discretion (a demolition permit is required prior to the start of work, fee $25). Since no geotechnical issues were observed by the engineer of record which would prevent the home from being occupied, the City will permit the home to be re -occupied. The red tag is hereby lifted from the residential portion of the home but the garage shall remain posted "unsafe" until the demolition work is complete. The City makes no representation regarding the safety of you or your home from future slide events. As the Hemphill report indicates, future unprecedented weather events could cause additional slide damage. It is understood that, once the accessory structure is removed, there may be need of exterior wall repair which may require a permit (this is relatively a minor process). If structural deficiencies in the residence are observed, we suggest that you enlist the services of a professional structural engineer for assistance in preparing plans and submitting to the City for the building permit. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • :a Mrs. Andahl Page Two June 5, 1997 Regarding the garage re -construction, if in the future you choose to re -build the garage please be advised the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard construction standards shall be imposed which requires detailed geotechnical investigation, professional engineered plans, drainage system installation, hold harmless covenants, and other technical as well as administrative requirements. The average processing time for this type of permit is three to six months and site work is limited during the months between September and May. The Meadowdale development packet may be purchased from the Permit Coordinator (fee $15) during normal business hours. Also, you may want to discuss the status of the garage with Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor with regard to setback requirements, SEPA and other zoning issues. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official, C.B.O. cc: Mayor Fahey City Attorney Mark Bucklin, Keating, Bucklin & McCormack Paul Mar, Community Services Director Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor • • • fN z W N O_ z o < o � Q � U) -j;U) z W a o V) J W CL W 11 0 ego • 0 w z WD- a�a W J D Z W • V) U O W ? � o W W !? w a cn z z c�?o zLLJ z Y 0 W U ~ 0_� NNW z a w U Z o 0 ~ W W LL Z a m Z z x 3 w w g a z o�W _� = m J O = O LLU)U) I � -&� A �_;`1 �P H L CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 CLIENT Alice Andahl 7516 Eaglefield Drive Arlington, Washington 98223 page 1 of 3 pages RFr.n REFERENCE Andahl house located at 15605 75th Place W, Meadowdale SUBJECT Investigation of slide and garage damage. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present the results of a geotechnical_ investigation of the slide and garage damage located at 15605 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds. The investigation and report were authorized on 10 May 1997 by Alice Andahl, owner, during a conversation with Dale C. Hemphill of HEMPHILL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INVESTIGATION HEMPHILL observed that the steep slope behind and north of the house had slid and collapsed the garage, damaging the contents including a car and boat. There was no evidence of damage to the house. The slide occurred on an unimproved extension of 156th Street. HEMPHILL climbed the slope and observed and tested the exposed soils, and determined that the remaining soils are hard and/or very dense and capable of standing at the steep slope. The soils that slid had become loosened by the weathering processes, which include wetting and drying, freezing and thawing, root action, direct rainfall, groundwater seepage, and uncontrolled or concentrated surface stormwater runoff. The most damaging to strong deeper soils on steep slopes is root action, usually from trees and mostly during heavy winds. The already loosened soils usually slide during or after a heavy rainfall where the excess water. has increased the weight and softened the soils. 4041 WEST LAKE SAMMAMISH PARKWAY SOUTHEAST • BELLEVUE • WASHINGTON • 98008 206 644 1080 PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 The excess water includes uncontrolled and/or concentrated surface runoff from the property above the slope. The excessive surface runoff often erodes the. weakened soils, causing a flow slide that can be the most damaging to downhill properties because of the velocities achieved, and the distances that flow slides can travel. A neighbor claimed to have observed a pipe at the upper south end of the page 2 of 3 pages slide surface to be leaking and finally burst to release a large volume of water onto the slope prior to the slide. The source and volume of the water were not determined by HEMPHILL. The pipe has since been repaired. HEMPHILL observed three pipes at that location, two of which were not properly anchored to prevent future failures. The third pipe conducts water to an open catch basin at the base of the slope behind the Andahl house. CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS HEMPHILL concludes that the slide was composed of the upper weathered soils that had been saturated and eroded by an unprecedented natural occurrence, and by a broken pipe that was not properly installed. The remaining soils are strong and capable of standing until the upper surface again softens due to the weathering processes, which could be many years. The soils on adjacent slopes will probably slide before that occurrence. The soils on adjacent slopes exist at similar angles and possibly the same amount of weathering, therefore the broken pipe could have been the major factor causing the failure. Natural runoff from the upper property is directed toward the undisturbed slope north of the slide. Other portions of the slope that . did not slide have survived two unprecedented natural occurrences; the heavy rainfall of a 5 day period that included a 100 year rainfall on 8 February 1996, and the combination snowmelt/rainfall on 31 December 1996. Therefore the exposed surface of the slide area, and the adjacent slopes, are stable at least until the next unprecedented occurrence, or - the failure of the pipes or other uncontrolled condition at the top of the slope. • PROJECT NUMBER 2234 25 May 1997 HEMPHILL concludes that the slide debris does not retain any portion of the slope, and therefore can be removed from the lower areas around the north and east sides of the house. The damaged garage can be removed and replaced, and damage Dale C. Hemphill P.E. G�1r�i Registered Engineer No. 14777 State of Washington page 3 of 3 pages to the house, if any, can be repaired. There is no structural damage to the house, therefore the house can be occupied. There is no danger of damage from the existing debris, or slides from the upper slopes until another unprecedented occurrence. RE WAS/�'� qy 14777 SICNAL V EXPIRES 17 FEBRUARY 1998 May 30, 1997 Lyle Chrisman Community Services Department Engineering Division 250-5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Chrisman, RF'CF.I,VFn . w s4 9 2 1997 ENGINEERING RECEI! PO MAY 3 0 1997 ENGINEERING This letter is in regards to the slide located on 156th street and 75th Place West. Located directly behind Alice Andahl's house. In a letter dated April 4, 1997 from the Mayor, she stated that we needed to engage in services from a geotechnical engineer to determine the safety and condition of the hillside before the city can permit occupancy. Enclosed you will find a report from Hemphill Consulting Engineers. We will be waiting for further communication from you regarding the status of occupancy, permits, debris removal. Alice Andahl would very much like to get back into her home and have this situation resolved as soon as possible. Sincer ly, z Lor Andahl c: Mayor Barbara Fahey Building Official: Jeannine Graf City Engineer: Jim Walker BUILDING J u N 2 . 1997 May 30, 1997 Jeannine Graf Community Services Department Building Official 250-5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear. Mrs. Graf, This letter is in regards to the slide located on 156th street and 75th Place West. Located directly behind .Alice Andahl's house. In a letter dated April 4, 1997 from the Mayor, she stated that we needed to engage in services from a geotechnical engineer to determine the safety and condition of the hillside before the city can permit occupancy. Enclosed you will find a report from Hemphill Consulting Engineers. We will be waiting. for further communication from you regarding the status of occupancy, permits, debris removal. Alice Andahl would very much like to get back into her home and have this situation resolved as soon as possible. Sincer ly, 6'`u C/ L ri Andahl c: Mayor Barbara Fahey . . City Engineer: Lyle Chrisman City Engineer: Jim Walker RECEIVED APR 1 7 1997 'hn UREr' OR WCES Law Offices 6? PATTERSON, ROWLEY & SCHWIMMER A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ORGANIZATION David P. Patterson Robert C. Rowley Rafael Schwimmer Honorable Barbara Fahey, Mayor City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mayor Fahey: April 11, 1994 STREET FILE OF,c/Ct 0"" 9 1,9,9? HFMgro,7 11306 83d PI. N.E. Kirkland, WA 98034 Tel: (206) 814-0884 Fay:: (206) 814-1384 Re: Response -April 4, 1997 Letter to Bruce Andahl (Alice Andahl) I represent Alice Andahl and am attempting to resolve the conflicts relating to the slide that damaged her property, including corrective action. I have contacted her home owners insurance carrier regarding the damage questions, and do not yet know what their coverage determination will be. Obviously, that determination will dictate whether I, or insurance counsel, will negotiate the damages question, and I understand that such negotiations will necessarily include the city's own insurance representative. The purpose of this letter is not to address that question, and I note that the "claim" was submitted by Mrs. Andahl's son, Bruce. If you could provide me with the name of the claim representative handling this matter, or the name of legal counsel if one has been selected, I can discuss those issues directly. Unfortunately, the related question of curing the threat, which keeps Mrs. Andahl from occupying her home, necessarily raises common issues. It is this question which your letter primarily addressed. What I propose is that I address your April 4, 1997 letter as it relates to correcting the problem, and that you provide a' copy to your insurance representative for consideration and response in the damage portion of the claim. I am not asking you to respond to this letter, but am merely attempting to correct some erroneous assumptions made in that letter. Correction and prevention of future problems necessarily involves the homeowners on the top of the bluff, Mr. and Mrs. Mezich and the City of Edmonds. ;Be aau§E th city will necessarily Ise *iv '-I dd in tthe corrective solution; both as-- yp'"""� ll of a our: ublic wo ks y la�nnui -and-le al staf . right L Y I p ermitfin authors to the Mezich_famil and, as ro rietor of the ri ht ofwa , ex ect --- that_ yoy u ...__.._� _ Y P , P g�g Though Mrs. Andahl is understandably anxious to resolve both the damage claim and corrective action, it is corrective action which is most urgent. The damage, while significant, is not what caused the home to be "red tagged" by the city. It is the threat of recurrence which forces Mrs. Andahl from her home. She cannot unilaterally "clean up" IL Letter to Mayor Fahey April 11, 1997 Page 2 the slide debris, as that may increase risk of destablilizing the slide material above, and she will probably need a permit from the city in any event. It is obvious that the city can not pretend that she has the unilateral power to solve this problem. The primary fallacy in your letter is your characterization of this slide as an "act of nature." Left to her own devices, nature saw fit to leave this bluff stable. It was the intervention of acts and omissions of Mezich and the City of Edmonds which caused this slide. City permits authorizing recent construction of the Mezich home recognized the destabilizing threat of drainage from the site, and conditioned the permit upon burial of a six inch drainage "tight line" to carry drainage from the Mezich property to city storm sewers below the Andahl property. They installed a six inch line only to the top of the bluff, where they downsized it to a four inch line. To make matters worse, they tied in additional four inch lines with the result that capacity of the entire system was limited by the illegally installed smaller pipe. The storm runoff that occurred was more severe than ordinary, but was foreseeable. The down sized drainage pipe actually installed was sufficient to handle the runoff from ordinary weather systems. However, faced with the pressures in the six inch portion of the system created by this system from above, the drainage line separated at the point near the top of the bluff at the coupling between four and six inch pipe. Witnesses saw the pipe separated at that point, with water gushing from the open end of the six inch pipe prior to the occurrence of the slide. Obviously, the combination of erosion and super saturation of the soil cause by the "fire hose" effect was the direct cause of the slide. This heavily vegetated slope has withstood such weather systems pre dating the construction of the Mezich home. The Andahls have examined City files related to the Mezich permit, and have spoken with city officials. They have learned that the drainage line was subject to city inspection and approval prior to its burial, and that it was situated in city right of way for the entire distance between the boundary of the Mezich property and the connecting point to the city's storm sewer. Though the city apparently "signed off" its approval to the down sized system, no permit revision allowing the reduction was ever made, and the city inspector admits that the city's approval was given without an actual inspection having been made. What was "approved" was a complete six inch line. What was installed was a four inch system. The fact of the matter is that existing debris, which makes the Andahl home uninhabitable, extends from her house, across the eastern portion of her property, and easterly across the city right of way and above to the Mezich property. I don't see how the city can, under these circumstances, pretend that Mrs. Andahl has an isolated problem which can be either removed or cured without joint action by all three affected parties. ----'v A entatives and have them respond_to this letter and Please confer with your repres these pr ms. ',1VIrs. Andahl is an elderly widow on fixed -income who wishes only to have restored to her the home where she has peacefully lived for decades. She has been homeless for nearly four months and is no nearer a resolution than on the day the slide occurred. This situation is far more onerous than a typical damage claim, and requires a corresponding good faith effort that transcends normal "pocket book" mentality usually taken by insurance companies. We think the city owes an obligation to correct what it 0 • Letter to Mayor Fahey April 11, 1997 Page 3 should have protected in the first instance, and at the very least owes a duty to investigate and require Mezich to participate to jointly solve this crises. It should be obvious that the most urgent and primary problem is to eliminate future risk. iThe city is key to solving that problem, and we demand that it take positive steps to see to it that,proper i5kfflihig and_drainage;solutions are designed_and_installed.No one is asking the city to "provide special services or benefits to individual citizens." We are demanding that you mitigate damages. Yours truly, Robert C. Rowley Attorney for Alice Andahl cc: Client Bruce Andal-1 Safeco Ins. Co. CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA.98020 � (206) 771-0247 • FAX (206) 771-0252 OFFICE .OF THE MAYOR Inc 1 S9 11 April4, 1997 Mr. B. Andahl 20026 12th Drive S.E. Bothell, WA 98012 Dear Mr. Andahl: This letter is in response to the. inquiry you made during the audience portion of the City Council meeting on April 1. I want to start by saying the City Council and I truly empathize with the problems you and several other residents are experiencing as a result of the unstable land condition in your particular area. Since your mother has lived there for over 50 years, I am sure she is well aware of the various slides that have occurred during that time. She probably vividly remembers the landslide during the winter of 1955-56 when several buildings were impacted by the shifting hillside. It is. fortunate, with such a long history in that area, that she has never been a victim of the conditions there before. I must, however, clearly state that having empathy related to the current situation does not signify any admission or agreement that the City is in any way responsible for the problems that exist or the cleanup and repair of private property impacted by the slides. You raised several questions at the meeting which must be addressed: You indicated that. you have not had any communication from the City since shortly after the slide occurred. In fact, you have had extensive interaction with the Engineering Department of the City. The head of the department, Jim Walker, has a log of several conversations with your wife Lori. He indicates clear information was given regarding the actions that would. have to be taken in order for the City to allow occupancy again of the house in question. This entailed your engaging the services of a geotechnical engineer to determine what is needed to be done to establish a stabilizedcondition and then implementation of the recommendations. The City must be presented with clear, pursuasive documentation that a geotechnical engineer has evaluated the conditions as safe before it can permit occupancy. It could not authorize occupancy if potential danger still existed that may ultimately cause injury or loss of life. Our records indicate the last conversation with Mrs. Andahl occurred on January 27, 1997 At that point, the City assumed you were pursuing the activities necessary and has been waiting for further communication from you regarding the status of the property. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • q Letter to Bruce Andahl April 4, 1997 Page 2 2. At the same time, the City is obviously aware that you have filed a claim for damages. If the communications issue is related to the claim, the situation is actually. out of our control. When a claim is filed, it is sent to our self insurance pooling group for disposition. At that point, the City assumes.a neutral role while it waits for a determination on the resolution of the claim. In order for the insurance pool to pay the claim, it must be determined that the City was somehow negligent and therefore liable for the damage. This determination is made by the self insurance pooling group (WCIA). Usually they are quite speedy in processing claims; however, the huge number of claims resulting from the extreme storm conditions and the complexity of the issues involved have required additional time.. The City is now trying to determine a timeline for a decision on your claim as well as several others. 3. Now, regarding the issue of debris removal from your property, the City cannot provide services on private property. You must arrange for removal of debris on your land as a result of the slide by a private company. The simple fact that the City has a right of way across privately owned property does not make it responsible for problems associated with the property unless it created some situation that constituted negligence. The property which slid had not been improved by the City in any way. Nothing to my knowledge was done by the City to cause any instability. The movement of mud and debris onto your mother's property was caused by activities of nature. In no way can the cause be attributed to the City. . In summary, Mr. Andahl, you will have to arrange for the cleanup of your mother's property and make the necessary repairs needed to facilitate the re -occupation of her home. The only role the City can play in this is to review the safety concerns and consequently issue a new occupancy permit if City Building Official Jeannine Graf is satisfied that the Uniform Building Code requirements for safety of the site have been met. You should contact her if you have any question regarding the process. I suspect from your comments at the meeting that you were hoping the City would agree to perform some of these tasks for you, but it is unable to do so. Legally, City staff cannot provide special services or benefits to individual citizens, except under emergency circumstances. Though I know this is not the response you were hoping for, it is the only one I can provide. Though I am confident most of these issues had been addressed by staff in the past, I hope this formal letter will further establish the course of action that must be followed in order to determine if your mother can move back into her home. Sincerely, Barbara Fahey 7—N Mayor BF/dm c: City Council Community Services Director City Engineer Building:.Official.. w►nwara6\cs97�A,da►12 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental and Geotechnical Services January 27, 1997 City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020. Attn: Mr. Jim Walker, P.E. RE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES LANDSLIDE ON 156TH ST RIGHT-OF-WAY NEAR 75TH PLACE W. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Walker: This letter summarizes our observations and recommendations related to the landslide that occurred .on the steep slope behind the last residence on the east side of 75th Place W. At the request of the City of Edmonds, representatives of Landau Associates visited the site on several occasions between December 31, 1996 and January 13, 1997 with City of Edmonds personnel to observe site conditions and to provide consultation to the City on the situation and potential future action. BACKGROUND We understand from conversations with several local residents that the landslide occurred in the late afternoon of December 30, 1996. The sound of flowing water coming from high on the slope was heard by a local resident about 4:00 p.m. At that time, the resident indicated'he could observe about an 8-ft exposed zone of soil.near the top of the slope. The exposed soil was in the general area of private drain lines that carried water down the slope from the residence at the top the bluff at 7215 156th Street.. Local residents reportedly heard a loud roar about 5:00 p.m. on December 30,1996 and immediately thereafter discovered the landslide. OBSERVATIONS The landslide had mudflow characteristics. The slide extended from the top of the slope to the bottom, with a width visually estimated to vary from about 20 ft near the top to about 50 ft near the base of the slope. The landslide appeared to only involve the surficial layer of soil on the steep bluff face along with trees and other surficial vegetation. The mudflow and vegetation material came to rest across the undeveloped 156th Street right-of-way, the downslope residential property to the south, and the undeveloped downslope property to the north. The mudflow and debris struck the back side of the downslope residence to the south collapsing the garage with a car and boat reportedly inside. The mudflow and debris did not extend as far west as 75th Place W. High on the slope towards the south edge of the failure zone, three broken pipes could be observed. One pipe appeared to be a 6-inch black corrugated drain pipe, and water was discharging from this pipe at the time of our visit on December 31, 1996. Two other corrugated pipes appearing to be about 4 inches in diameter could be seen emerging from the slope in this same vicinity. Remnants of these pipes could be observed scattered on and at the base of the slope within the slide debris. We understand that no City of Edmonds pipelines or other improvements are located within the 156th Street right-of-way. Based on site characteristics and observations by local residents, it appears that drainage from the observed private drain pipes could either be a triggering cause or a significant contributing factor to the landslide. It is not known at this time whether the pipes were leaking and initiated slope movement or whether the heavy rains preceding the landslide precipitated the slope movement, which in turn broke the pipes and contributed substantial water to the steep bluff slope. The landslide occurred following a very wet December and a combination of snowmelt and heavy rairi in the last week of December. These conditions produced landslides and mudslides throughout the region. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that certain actions be taken in the short term to help stabilize the conditions. The drain pipe should be intercepted and routed down the slope to a suitable discharge by a temporary tight line pipe. To the extent practicable, the steep slope should be protected from. further erosion or infiltration of water by placing plastic sheeting or other slope protection materials over the slope. Water emerging from the landslide debris or resulting from upslope surface runoff should be routed away from the downslope residence to an appropriate storm drain. We concur with the City's decision to prohibit occupancy of the downslope residence in the short term. There is some potential for additional slope movement that could endanger or further damage the downslope residence. Undisturbed portions of the slope adjacent to the present slide 2 area could also move. With improved weather and temporary stabilization measures completed, the risk of additional movement within the existing slope could be reduced to potentially allow reoccupancy of the residence. We recommend that the property owners retain a geotechnical engineering consultant to further evaluate conditions and provide specific advise to the property owner. Until the mudslide and debris materials drain and dry out somewhat, they could also move further if debris and mud removal efforts are attempted. Mud and debris removal should be accomplished from the top down in a deliberate manner to avoid potentially reactivating the slide mass. To limit possible additional slope movement and to help buttress the base of the slope, we suggest leaving as much material as possible at the base of the slope during removal of the slide debris. Long-term stabilization measures should include routing new drain lines from the property on top of the bluff down to a suitable discharge. The drain line should consist of HDPE pipe (or similar material) welded together to form a continuous watertight pipeline with sufficient strength and flexibility to accommodate some degree of pipe distortion due to slope movements. The new pipeline should be well secured to the slope. Active measures should be taken to revegetate the exposed slope to the extent practicable and. protect it from erosion. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City of Edmonds. Please call if you have any questions or if we maybe of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Dennis R: Stettler, P.E. Principal and vv Wade Gilbert, P.E. Project Engineer DRS/JWG/ml No. 74061.10 01/27/97 1:\074\061\156TH-ST.RPT cc: Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds 3 BU110ING LANDAU JAN Z 7 1997 ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental and Geotechnical Services January 27, 1997 City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Mr. Jim Walker, P.E. RE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES LANDSLIDE ON 156TH ST RIGHT-OF-WAY NEAR 75TH PLACE W. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Walker: This letter summarizes our observations and recommendations related to the landslide that occurred on the steep slope behind the last residence on the east side of 75th Place W. At the request of the City of Edmonds, representatives of Landau Associates visited the site on several occasions between December 31, 1996 and January 13, 1997 with City of Edmonds personnel to observe site conditions and to provide consultation to the City on the situation and potential future action. BACKGROUND We understand from conversations with several local residents that the landslide occurred in the late afternoon of December 30,1996. The sound of flowing water coming from high on the slope was heard by a local resident about 4:00 p.m. At that time, the resident indicated he could observe about an 8-ft exposed zone of soil near the top of the slope. The exposed soil was in the general area of private drain lines that carried water down the slope from the residence at the top the bluff at 7215 156th Street. Local residents reportedly heard a loud roar about 5:00 p.m. on December 30,1996 and immediately thereafter discovered the landslide. OBSERVATIONS The landslide had mudflow characteristics. The slide extended from the top of the slope to the bottom, with a width visually estimated to vary from about 20 ft near the top to about 50 ft near the base of the slope. The landslide appeared to only involve the surficial layer of soil on the steep bluff face along with trees and other surficial vegetation. The mudflow and vegetation material came to rest across the undeveloped 156th Street right-of-way, the downslope residential property to the south, and the undeveloped downslope property to the north. The mudflow and debris struck the back side of the downslope residence to the south collapsing the garage with a car and boat reportedly inside. The mudflow and debris did not extend as far west as 75th Place W. High on the slope towards the south edge of the failure zone, three broken pipes could be observed. One pipe appeared to be a 6-inch black corrugated drain pipe, and water was discharging from this pipe at the time of our visit on December 31, 1996. Two other corrugated pipes appearing to be about 4 inches in diameter could be seen emerging from the slope in this same vicinity. Remnants of these pipes could be observed scattered on and at the base of the slope within the slide debris. We understand that no City of Edmonds pipelines or other improvements are located within the 156th Street right-of-way. Based on site characteristics and observations by local residents, it appears that drainage from the observed private drain pipes could either be a triggering cause or a significant contributing factor to the landslide. It is not known at this time whether the pipes were leaking and initiated slope movement or whether the heavy rains preceding the landslide precipitated the slope movement, which in turn broke the pipes and contributed substantial water to the steep bluff slope. The landslide occurred following a very wet December and a combination of snowmelt and heavy rain in the last week of December. These conditions produced landslides and mudslides throughout the region. RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that certain actions be taken in the short -term to help stabilize the conditions. The drain pipe should be intercepted and routed down the slope to a suitable discharge by a temporary tight line pipe. To the extent practicable, the steep slope should be protected from further erosion or infiltration of water by placing plastic sheeting or other slope protection materials over the slope. Water emerging from the landslide debris or resulting from upslope surface runoff should be routed away from the downslope residence to an appropriate storm drain. We concur with the City's decision to prohibit occupancy of the downslope residence in the short term. There is some potential for additional slope movement that could endanger or further damage the downslope residence. Undisturbed portions of the slope adjacent to the present slide 2 area could also move. With improved weather and temporary stabilization measures completed, the risk of additional movement within the existing slope could be reduced to potentially allow reoccupancy of the residence. We recommend that the property owners retain a geotechnical engineering consultant to further evaluate conditions and provide specific advise to the property owner. Until the mudslide and debris materials drain and dry out somewhat, they could also move further if debris and mud removal efforts are attempted. Mud and debris removal should be accomplished from the top down in a deliberate manner to avoid potentially reactivating the slide mass. To limit possible additional slope movement and to help buttress the base of the slope, we suggest leaving as much material as possible at the base of the slope during removal of the slide debris. Long-term stabilization measures should include routing new drain lines from the property on top of the bluff down to a suitable discharge. The drain line should consist of HDPE pipe (or similar material) welded together to form a continuous watertight pipeline with sufficient strength and flexibility to accommodate some degree of pipe distortion due to slope movements. The new pipeline should be well secured to the slope. Active measures should be taken to revegetate the exposed slope to the extent practicable and protect it from erosion. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City of Edmonds. Please call if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. Principal and kv ah '/� Wade Gilbert, P.E. Project Engineer DRS/JWG/ml No. 74061.10 O1/27/97 J:\074\061\156TH-ST.R11T cc: Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds rnc.1Scjv • • STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH � EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771.0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering January 10, 1997 Lori Andahl 20026 - 12th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98012 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation of Slide Originating at 7215 -156th Street SW Dear Ms. Andahl, The Building Division requirement for geotechnical review of your property was a standard letter sent to all property owners where slides had potential to endanger improvements to property. As we discussed last week, reports are already being prepared for the City and the Mezich property. Since the City right-of-way adjoining your property has a situation almost identical to your property, it may not be necessary for you to prepare a separate report. The report from the geotechical engineer for the Mezich property has been received by the City. You can get a copy of it if you request it. Once the City report is prepared, I will send you a copy of it. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, S15W-a-�- e. MA"q, James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer JCW/sf c: Jeannine Graf, Building Official V/ ANDAHL.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 1�c.1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • .Engineering January 10, 1997 Lori Andahl 20026 - 12th Drive SE Bothell, WA 98012 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation of Slide Originating at 7215 -156th Street SW Dear Ms. Andahl, BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR The Building Division requirement for geotechnical review of your property was a standard letter sent to all property owners where slides had potential to endanger improvements to property. As we discussed last week, reports are already being prepared for the City and the Mezich property. Since the City right-of-way adjoining your property has a situation almost identical to your property, it may not be necessary for you to prepare a separate report. The report from the geotechical engineer for the Mezich property has been received by the City. You can get a copy of it if you request it. Once the City report is prepared, I will send you a copy of it. If you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220. Sincerely, ;at�' e. MA?e' James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer JCW/sf / c: Jeannine Graf, Building Official v ANDAHL.DOC • Incorporated August 11,.1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • • January 9, 1997 Jeannine L. Graf, C.B.O. Community Services Department Building Division 250 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Jeannine Graf, BUILDING JAN 1 3 1997 STREET FILE On January 7, 1997 Alice Andahl received your letter regarding the slide damage done to her property. In this letter you stated that she must contact a licensed Geotechnical Engineer to submit a report to you regarding the property at15605 75th Pl. W., by January 15, 1997. We feel that she should not have to pay for a service that does not pertain to her property. Her land is stable. As you have seen, it is Mr. Rick Mezich and the City of Edmonds easement that has slid onto Alice's property. We contacted Jim Walker on January 8. I spoke with him on the phone and also in person regarding this issue. He informed Bruce Andahl and myself that Alice does not need to have an Engineer out nor have a report to you by the 15th of this month. He requested that we follow up with this letter to you. Thank you, Lori Andahl Bruce Andahl cc: Jim Walker P� BUILDING JAN 1 3 1997 January 9, 1997 Jeannine L. Graf, C.B.O. Community Services Department Building Division 250 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Jeannine Graf, On January 7, 1997 Alice Andahl received your letter regarding the slide damage done to her property. In this letter you stated that she must contact a licensed Geotechnical, Engineer to submit a report to you regarding the property at15605 75th Pl. W. by January 15, 1997. We feel that she should not have to pay for a service that does not pertain to her property. Her land is stable. As you have seen, it is Mr. Rick Mezich and the City of Edmonds. easement that has slid onto Alice's property. We contacted Jim Walker on January 8. I spoke with him on the phone and also in person regarding this issue. He informed Bruce Andahl and myself that Alice does not need to have an Engineer out nor have a report to you by the 15th of this month. He requested that we follow up with this letter to you. Thank you, 1 : , Lori Andahl Bruce Andahl cc:Jim Walker .St 189' CITY OF f DMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering January 2, WV6 /It? I Mrs. Alice Andahl c/o Mr. Bruce Andahl 15605 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Dear Mrs. Andahl; BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR On December 31, 1996, City Officials observed slide damage on property you own at @ 15605 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington. The City has been in contact with the property owner to the east who will be providing a geotechnical engineer's report and plan to the City for protection of his private property. The property owner has verbally indicated this report will not resolve issues on your property. As the owner of the property located at 15605 75th Place West, Edmonds, you are responsible for slope protection and/or mitigation of damage suffered on your property. Pursuant to Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code, it is my determination that the existing residence is in danger due to the "movement or instability of the ground,", and a geotechnical report and plan prepared by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer is required prior to the start of any work, including tree/debris removal or demolition. This plan should include temporary and permanent erosion control, necessary slope protection or slope mitigation measures and subsurface or surface drainage improvements, as applicable. The report and plan shall be submitted to the City by January 15th, 1997 or sooner. Any work deemed "emergency" by the geotechnical engineer in the report, shall be immediately installed (provided no City permits or discretionary approvals are required). You may contact the City Engineer, Mr. Tim Walker if you have any questions regarding debris in the developed or undeveloped City right-of-way. Please note, a demolition permit is required for the carport removal as well as a permit for re -construction of the carport. If you have any questions please contact me at 771-0220. Thank you, 6 fA * L. Gra"- Jeannine Building Official, C.B.O M M "n M • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan d ; SENDER:::.... C ■Complete items tand/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the following for an g �. w W ■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. ■ Print your name' and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this ,SefVlCes extra fee): card to you. ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. 0 Addressee's Address „ 4) permit.. ■ Write'Return Receipt Requested' on,the mailpiece below.the article number. 2; ❑ Restricted Delivery aZi N "`« "■The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date p Consult postmaster for fee. p •' a' '� � delivered. _ ° � 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number _ Cr. `tf P 152 079 246 E'- a Mrs. Alice Andahl t ;;. 4b. Service Type o V 15605 75th Place Wes°:�> ' ❑ Registered ❑ Certified, ' rn rn Edmonds WA 98026;` , ❑Express Mail >6Z�N"IIAeInsured yw p Return Re I f{o MercCOD p 7. Date of D ]KAINo Z °C H +� °> t 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addresses r 9 (Only' r� uested ( y w and fee is id��ti� p 6. Signature:•, (Addressee or Agent) o. X �. PS Form 3811, December 1994 Domestic Refiarn'Receipt CSt 189v • CITY OF EDMONDS STREET FILE 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering January 2, W6 M N°'k " h&lr %' C p/iec.r jcg4- Mrs. Alice Andahl c/o Mr. Bruce Andahl 15605 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Dear Mrs. Andahl; BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR On December 31, 1996, City Officials observed slide damage on property you own at @ 15605 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington. The City has been in contact with the property owner to the east who will be providing a geotechnical engineer's report and plan to the City for protection of his private property. The property owner has verbally indicated this report will not resolve issues on your property. As the owner of the property located at 15605 75th Place West, Edmonds, you are responsible for slope protection and/or mitigation of damage suffered on your property. Pursuant to Section 302 of the Dangerous Building Code, it is my determination that the existing residence is in danger due to the "movement or instability of the ground,", and a geotechnical report and plan prepared by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer is required prior to the start of any work, including treeldebris removal or demolition. This plan should include temporary and permanent erosion control, necessary slope protection or slope mitigation measures and subsurface or surface drainage improvements, as applicable. The report and plan shall be submitted to the City by January 15th, 1997 or sooner. Any work deemed "emergency" by the geotechnical engineer in the report, shall be immediately installed (provided no City permits or discretionary approvals are required). You may contact the City Engineer, Mr. Tim Walker if you have any questions regarding debris in the developed or undeveloped City right-of-way. Please note, a demolition permit is required for the carport removal as well as a permit for re -construction of the carport. If you have any questions please contact me at 771-0220. Thank you, 01;�P* xjv� Jeannine L. Graf Building Official, C.B.O. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 01/14/1995 18:15 2064896179 BOTHELL HIGH SCHOOL PAGE 02 is UTILITY EASEMENT VtV ! % , -...- - ERN f'ts to accrue to the grantors here- Ej�GIN ne t IN CONSIDERATION of bi e in, the undersigned, Stanley Andahl and Alice Andahl hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of a storm sewer over, across, through, and below the following undergrowth property; and the further right to remove trees, bushes, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said utility or utilities, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement and right-of-way hereby granted is located at the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: A ten foot strip of land that is 5.00 feet on each side of the storm sewer as it now exists, or as located in the future. within the following described property: All that portion of Tract 24, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 5 of plats, page 38, records of said county, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of that portion of Tract 24 lying East of county road; thence in a Northerly direction along the Easterly margin of said road 142 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing Northerly along East margin of county road 122 feet; thence Easterly parallel to South boundary of Tract 24 120 feet; thence Southerly parallel to the county road 122 feet; thence Westerly parallel to south boundary of Tract 24 120 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH a temporary 10 foot construction easement over the aforementioned property. Said construction easement will end upon the completion of the construction of the storm sewer, or January 1, 1985, whichever comes first. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condi- tion such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, main- tenance and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure r over, upon, or within the permanent easement. il 19 83 DATED this 27th day of Apr�:Y'� �'/ZVL/ STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISHi On this day personally appeared before me Stanley B. Andahl �i e u nnAahl known to be the lndiv dus and to me al Ide- and �n and who executed the within scrand foregoing instrument, and si ned the same as their acknowledged that they_ 9 , Eor the uses and purposes therein mentioned. and voluntary act and deed UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 27th DAY OF April, 1983. N AR PUBLI in and for the State of ashington residing at Edmonds ,��bM!,:t+,.,� •: f i:r,pYl �su.aoanMlM+��+�'�" •. 7 , iu` u7�11� .'1•'•'J�f+"11 JOT 'r&jjXV'' C T Y OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS — ENGIPIEERING SUSPENSE DATE: Date: Time: C%' File N Attachments: REQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE CONTACT IN OFFICE OTHER: RECEIVED BY: DDIITE TA. N? 3422 =Yes "IM va■ffnm ®■ i: •IJ �■■ --I °ei M= iM of ©i iimii�■■�i�i ACTION: All Concerned Notified O Action Completed/File �7I� 00 STREET FILE � • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES December 21, 1984 Mr. & Mrs. Stanley Andahl 1.5605 - 75t.h Pl. W.- Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Andahl: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Last week Jerry Hauth and myself spoke with the.City Attorney about the slide on the bank behind your house. The City Attorney advised us that regardless of the easement that was granted to the city, the city has no responsibility to go in and cleanup the slide. In addition, if the city were to go in and clean up the slide, it would establish a precedence that might prove difficult to uphold in the future. Because of the size of the stump that has slid and its proximity to your house, we recommend that you contact someone about removing the stump and associated debris. Sincerely, E NF J es E. Adams;P.Ey Engineer JH/ep. PUBLIC WORKS • PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION • ENGINEERING . �: .:.i. v. j, 'f.n-.♦-•:iFiit.0..�1•"ti,jv8 n�`Yr �� i �•-F:Y4'i)"y�,""1:�'.ii y��`�r�''T'��"7/V�YPr �yi�t�?iit�-•�4�.{1•ti`LrofV�r'M''b,'�J:i �wC.dlf��l�'>f�". YC�'�i't'l�+Fr :I�.I,�.,-, .. b{°�., �..� �...Ya yr .l .. r.'L� 7�1�+�.a City of Edmond* RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT permit Number: Issue Date: ? T A.. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 15605 75TH PL WEST 18 9 0 19 B. Type of Work (be specific): PLOW -60—FT OF SERVICE DROP FROM .POWER P.ED TO, POLE. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SKETCH. C. Contractor: GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED Contact: BARBARA TOLLEFSON, PERMIT COORDINATOR Mailing Address: 2211a 20TH AVE SE, SUITE 130 Phone: BARB 488-1642 State License #: BOTHELL, WA 98021 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building. Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project FX] Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other 2100-9POOIDB 242310 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ❑ Yes ®No G. Size of Cut: ,-xH. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AN4ainst IGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and b his signature to this application, agrees to he City of Edmonds harmless ire' fie�4 m / PP Y PP g Y f9r . fur i ,jeges,or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be madthe City of Edmonds, or any of its depart ents or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting t lus permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BEHELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH is COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIMER DEBIT OR:CREDIT WILL. BE.PROCESSED'F_OR.ISSUAN_ CE TO TH_ E•APPLICANT'— Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please calkhe-Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion.. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and`Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. ` I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: 420 Date: 10-27-94 r Jon t wart CALL I -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: �N�' c✓� RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER, �`^' 5-� S DAYS. DISRUPTION FEE/FUND .111 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: N� COMMENTS: DATE: RESTORATION, FEE:, PERMIT FEE NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE yF, n l,�rg. 1)iv. 1991 I I PH vioHd qL MNJ IL Z2 0 13 LU C3 O 610 Ln ul V, m.—► -cx ? w w 0 0:0'. cm 0 a.a.xo-,= ry) 7TT' co VA 11-18-94 12;09PM • • E QV � 8 19gy FAX MESSAGE T0: DATE: NOTIFICATION OF WIRE J013 START PERMIT # ADDRESS: ew- FRoM: WARD TOLLEFsov Girt . PSORE: (206) 488-1642 , -1671 ��a POl 11-18-94 12.09PM • �1 P@2 90 19Cl _ City of Edmonds .• RXM;JdIT-OF-WAiCONSTRUCTION PERMIT S x aidt Number.,3� A. Address or VicWly of Construction. 15605 75TH PL WEST B, Type of Work (bc apo6fic); ?LOW bG--FT OF SERVICE DROP FROM POWER WED TO POLE. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED SXETCH. C. Contractor. GTE NORTliWJZST INCORPOPATEi) Contact; BAABAIA TOLLEFSON, PIMIT COOkDINATO�t Mailing Addrsae:22tlt& 20'I' VE S8, SLISE 130Phone: � BARB 488-1642 State Lice= g: SbTHELL , WA 98021 ` •_ Liability b=raacc: _ Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Perrait # (if applicable): E. 0 Commercisl 0 Subdivision 0 City Project 0 Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) C] Multi-Fantily ❑ Single Family ❑ Other 2100-9F001DB 242310 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pav^oaw or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yea MNO G, Size of Cut: x U. Charts$ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INZ)rmNrTY: AppUc",lnderatandv and by Me aidndturB to thla appilaation, agrool tv 4 kh0Q!t?' of EWmatda hamdann/rdm lnjurl.. -I. nr claim of any kind nr deeeription talatsoeuer, Ammon or unforeseen, that rtoy be MO c�pptr:al the (Wy of Raomda, or any or trt tlepordnenrx ar employeaa, lnclud W or not limitasl to At defendeof any EvgalPrveeedint;a u+olud&%U dafanaawain. and attornry jabs &�,' edagan of granting tltloParma. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR F'OL OW VO THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE IGORK. ITS rTXATED REST 0RATION FFF,S WIL1, BE HELD UNTIL. TIMS F11VAL 8TRN.EET PATCH as CoNpLETW B.Y CITYF'ORMI, AT R:MICff TIME A Ijk"T RR t;REVIT WIL L BEPROCIMELo FAR isSUANCE To TH A6.APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with portrait application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes, Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer, All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I'have read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and thepink copy of thepernait will be available on sire at all qe$ t ec 'on purposes, '�J* w 10-27-�94 Signature, --- contra t) lute, l qW jjftl CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK — FOR CITY USE ONLY APPRQVZD BY; u% 4 "� FIGHT OF WAY pRF(?6itT TINF AUTHORIZED: VOID AiFrEIr � � DAYS DI9IiVPT10N F'LE/FCTND 1m SPPCIAL CONDITION& NA — RESTORATION FEE: PEBRPdrr FEEL CO3MC fTB, DATE: TOTAL FEE: RECEIPT FEES ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Hn;pw• 1. « r .10 9 Tr� v N Nu Its iv I N41. Ab MP -4- lot', jl /r�?ijJ1Vl r l �� If3i j"a► fte%1 ��. r r �i. S �t�h1 t, 1•. �� 1 � �� , i(w r`i,u agg��11Ki1!JRl�i in �Y !� r� ly'.� t'+ ■ �yqy�� M+1 r� . ,/i a1Q�j L.•!t R +R'._,. ��''1{1'i •i t � I ; �; � 2 � �� 4f�,r /��, �, {'�. �, �� 1zt'�„� it !(f �,. it t�� J f I {1 2 ti J•, t j j ,pt J! ' t t 't'P%tt! }e °';k*,►,�. Y. c Ir'I,fAIS C Q t.1.�1 � 1 t � 1 3 �f � �f / ,/,•r, ; ��, , •-r ��r ��r� i ��,� �• � n i%t"�4�t t��'R} � r � •_' 11 t A. ' �' '. n' r r,1J t{ � r. �`ii/':' r' wrt � 1 �:�11 li �jj.'.• i�3t�r<��•�. L ��,,II11II I�+Y �. �� r 1'�. ' i A 1, r•,./ /(� f S��If Fr �1. _� �r�j� �!�^ f 'i�' \ � j� Jv� �{` 'ri !/ r'} 1 , 1, ♦ , `�I q f q i , 4�� I'�., •� ~ � t t j'��, j' 1 � � 1 /jr 1•. 1+ �'�� j � �� •.Ir1t; �� i � f� �' r�i - r4 �1G j9�+ .. � r �r "t`�,.�'�f�.G3^ e � 1 <�;•. cir 10 SN.' -�(�� ! to � � p � j t ! � ri 4 �5..1 -.-• L � %7 "Y'r `(Y �. } �Ref�;�, \ .LS"'. .•n r� � ��i l 1 �l' � � ,{, .,.:t2 �31 'i e tt t CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE �'7°0546 NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JDe ADDRESS 1_ j'/„ /��' OWNERNAME/NAM OF BUSINESS ( LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO LAD NO, i MAILING ADDRESS W. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP, EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required x Street U. Permit Raqb _ ❑, Inspection Required (Vt'T` Sidewalk Required ❑ R C Y ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER N ATA E a METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED w YES ❑ NO ❑ ADDRESS S 2 2 REMARKS ` 19 y„01`t CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER /I �( O NAME Am r-Iffin ADDRESS lJ 530 Z c U ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY �¢ O v ZIP (, 25 TELEPHONE NUMBER O .52'I I- -. FIRE MEMO;DATED REVIEWED @Y S TE LICENSE NUMBER E/�TP�IRATlO DATE .� � -> g ✓ VARIANCE OR CU' AD@ SHORELINE a Legal Description of Property - include;albeasements. -$EPA REVIEW COMPLETE ' ,'EXEMPT - SIGN AREA i ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED P31 coo _ 'L, �T `—"• "•"% LI w �+ I I LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED . PROPOSED REQUIRED;SETBACKS (FT.)'. FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (PT.) .FRONT UR SIDE REAR p W ,'t (Y1 h R PLt 60Y 5o LZD Properfq.. - Tax Accounts a LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE Parcel No. - DENTIAL �- PLUMSINGIMECHADDITION REMARKSNEW,: ET .MERCIAL CHANGE OF USE L . REMODEL SLOG: ON. CHECKED BY .. : TYPE -OF _ CONSTRUCTION CODE � yt �ry Q� 1 OCCUPANT GROIppJ� GRADING FENCE >`' ✓ O REPAIP ❑, CYDS. I x_Ft') WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL �y DEMOLISH El INSERT L a. HOT TUB/SPA CARPORT ROCKERYG WALL O .RENEWAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED O YES AREA _ - ' OAOPAN7 EMARKS 0 rr IT FUSE, BUSINESSOR:ACTwTY):EXPLAIN:-, CRITICAL0 NUMBER NUMBER PROGRESS' INSPECTIONS PER:UBC 10S Z 6— �c'Crf�1',SOlI.S m0 OF /��(� /y�1%'f% AREAS STORIES ©�Yy UDNITSELLI i1/'.s+ NUM ER J GAD Qy - l T ' ESCRIBE WORK TO BE ONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL` INSPECTION REQUIRED., � ,'- —Iwo i o 614 'VALUATION. FEE PLAN GHECK FEE - BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING W PLUMBING .` Plan Check No. MECHANICAL,, This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curls, sidewalks, STATE SURCHARGE driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. Permit Application:140 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE ''Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE N W Qemployees, = successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, and agents from any and all Claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directlyor indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0 i modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE w1y 2- o 1(7(y Li I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information. given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insur Q RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGN ATU tQWNER R AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT 1 f3� CITY OF OFF AL'B SIG ATURE GD�ATE �. (F EDMONDS 1F°! Jp ! 71 ATTENTION CALL FOR ELEASED Y DATE INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE j _O��O File UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 77 l ORIGINAL — e YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 102.117