Loading...
20040230.pdfDATE RECEIVED PERMITEXPIRES C1W OF EDMONDS PERMIT ZONE 'e, NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS 0 ",R NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS 1, I\ j L_ L PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO, LOT NO LID NO. W MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE S z 3. 0 111 L4 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Appfoved 0 RW Permit Required [3 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Street Use Permit Hoq'd C3 EXISTING - PROPOSED inspection Required E3 Sidewalk Required E3 REQUIRED DEDICATION- Fr Underground Wiring required NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 13 No z LU ADDRESS REMARKS LU z z OWNER/CONTRAcrOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE 5 M < � CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Z tu NAME r-,, I C13L Ar ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY ADDRESS IM — ­ I I - I I � I I � I I . FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE CITY 1P. TELEPHONE 0 U Ul EXPIRAT VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADO# I INSPECTION 13OND STATE LICENSE NUMBER ION ED BY 6 REO'D POSTED ACO iA - 03 —1 1 DYES 26-0 S _j SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT 4 PROPERIY TAX AICCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED , PROPOSED 0 LU 010 -74 /�_95�8;Z 4901 I!�_) EXP E] NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) 11h M ALLOWED PROPOSED r,iONT SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR COMPLIANCE OR z ADDITION COMMERCIAL 4 PtL 2 EL CHANGE OF USE . C z PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED 13Y DATE REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN REO'D I PROVIDED GRADING FENCE 3 :3 77001. El REPAIR CYDS ( X Fr) REMARKS I DEMOLISH TANK O� �ER J9 6 11 z ElGARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRF 9PRINKLER CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: rl—io CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPA;r K f GROUP, NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL i OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA OCCUPANT M to STORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED [] YES LOAD DESCRI13E WORK TO 13E DONE REMARKS z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RECI'D E VALUATION ;0�; -&/ /0� V� $ Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCi___F GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO' VESTED DATE Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 2 Grading :3 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review u, PERMIT APPLICATION: 11110DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 100 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review PlanChk.Deposit ol­ IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANYAND Fire Inspection M Receipt ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF [HIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE LandscapeInsp. Total Amt. Due 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE ci ryS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION,' xi Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR 111E DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGRI�E TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC. This application is not a poinfit unill t,ijInu(I hy III,, TION; AND IN DOING TIE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building Official or his/her Deptily: an(l row, it,(, );,Ill. sn,d IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space Intwoml WORKMEN-S/Q0 _ NSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. ,_NRF, OFFICI��S SIYNAFURE PAll SIrRATUR OWNER "NT) DATE SIGNED (425) V 771-0220 REI. EASFDPY/ AtTCNTION E)ff 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORID'INAL JFILE YLI I (J irv.i,l I CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK-. M�Nrm GOI 1) A!.'.] 09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES z 0 1 0 M :q =5 M C M 0 ­10 0 C: M M Z 0 --1 C �2: 55 0 -T1 M M 0 Y) 0 r- 0 M Cn M 0 Z X z Cj) z 0 A 0 M I L I-- E RITA MILLER 1047 EDMONDS STREET EDMONDS 98020 425- 771-9159 TAX No: 0043 4204 202400 LEGAL: CITY OF EDMONDS, BLOCK 042-DO LOTS 24 & 25 LESS N 5 FT FOR ALLEY LOT 26 LESS W 20FT & N 5 FT PLUS ADJ S 1/z VAC ALLEY. ORD 516 LOTSIZE: 70'xllO'=7,700SQ.FT. APPROVED By ENGINEERING Dew APPROVED BY PLAi�,4\16 1 T V 0 P Y RECF—WED MAR 12 2004 PERMIT COUNTER F �-Lks 15 T f2— T E - L z 0 4 0 m =i *fi co 0 M m 0 0 0 0 C M M Z c CD 0 -n n m M 055 0 r- 0 M cn co M 0 Z z co z 0 0 E, - Dear Ms. Miller: The ADU portion of your residence is in code compliance. As far as the City is concerned the ADU is signed off and enforcement is stopped. The notation on the hot water tank in the adjacent rec room was given to pursuant to UPC WAC 509.0 which states, 'water heaters which depend on the combustion of fuel for heat shall not be installed in a room used or designed to be used for sleeping purposes, b athrooms, clothes closets, or in a closet or other confined space opening into a bath or bedroom.' Thus, the rec room shall not be used as a sleeping Z, 0 room/bedrbom. Sincerely, 0 M Michael Snook Combination Inspector :n City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220 ext. 1333 M --10 ----- Original Message ----- 0 0 C From: rf miller [mailto:rfrymiller@yahoo.com] —1 M Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:46 PM M z To: Snook, Mike C Subject: Re: Plan Review Corrections for #04-081 > Dear Mike: thank You for Your excellent and reassuring work. I very much appreciated your inspection. 0 -n -n M M f couldn't concentrate too well oil your recommendations for the hot wa ter heater with so many Cn 0 people there; but am curious if You said I could just build a box around it or if I needed to get a 0 M V) whole different set LIP to be safe if I accidentally fall asleep. it has been fine but Your additional 9 Cn note made me very nervous and I dont know why that was added since it wasn't even part of the Q 0 ADU and never was in the original violation complaint. Do You? Who told You to Write it? Thanks again and I w0LIld appreciate your C011finning that YOU received this email. thanks rita miller z "Snook, Nlikell <Snook&i.editionds. wa. its> wrote: z 0 M > ATTACHMENT part TEXT application/nisword narne=Plan review blank.doc Do you Yahoo!? Center - File online. File on time. 4/1/2004 I RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS ..................... FOUNDATION: Footing ...................... Wall.......................... Pier/Porch ................. Retaining Wall ........... z Stab Insulation .......... 0 PLUMBING: 1711 Underground ............. Rough -In ................... 0 M Commercial Final ...... M a 0 __10 HEATING: C K. MGas Test .................... M z Gas Piping ................. C > z Equipment ................. Commercial Final ....... o -n EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING .......................... m rn 0 FRAMING ........................ 0 r 0 M FIRST FLOOR FRAMING ... C (n Cn M 0 INSULATION ................... Z Floor Insulation ......... Wall Insulation ........... :E > Ceiling Insulation z --I SHEETROCK NAILING ... z SPECIAL INSPECTION ... 0 M MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY .................. VOO vcyyv Jkc V� ou Ice_Q1_ C L vj, \P_1 13 -3z>