Loading...
SEPA_Checklist (16).pdfOF EDA, O VP St. I Purpose of Checklist: I��iii'C • ► u ► ' : �:i � t The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. .: l 9 911/0111 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan 2. Name of applicant: Carrie Hite, City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 425-771-0230 4. Date checklist prepared: December 2, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist_PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 1 of23 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): does not apply (STAFF 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The planning process included an inventory of parks, open spaces and wildlife in Edmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist —PROS PLAN —120213.doc Page 2 of 23 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. SEPA approval and City Council adoption. (STAFF COM 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan provides comprehensive guidance on the development and management of Edmonds' parks, recreation and open space system and the services provided by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. Edmonds updates its PROS Plan and its Community Cultural Plan on a six-year cycle, in alignment with the requirements of the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) to maintain eligibility for federal and state grant programs. The PROS Plan is also an important tool in meeting Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements and achieving the important citywide goals outlined in the Strategic Action Plan. (STAFF CO 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. City of Edmonds (city-wide) (STAFF Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 3 of 23 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle ,one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? does not apply (STAFF COMMENT C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. does not apply Remised on 8119111 P71 - SP -PA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 4 of 23 (STAFF COMMEN L Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. does not apply 0 (STAFF g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. does not apply b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. does not apply Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist—PROS—PLAN-120213. doe Page 5 oJ'23 (STAFF CO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: does not apply 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) AFF COMMENTS)_:"". *� s .°�._, d...�A���u..'w Jo r'�m W�� �•,� �au. , �':,,� a.-, �mw.1 N, ,i:� � (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. does not apply (STAFF COMMENT (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. does not apply Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 6 of 23 (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 7 of 23 C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. does not apply (STAFF CO (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: does not apply 4. Plants a. (STAFF COM Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: does not apply evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: does not apply shrubs does not apply grass does not apply pasture does not apply crop or grain does not apply wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: does not apply water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: does not apply other types of vegetation: does not apply Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 8 of 23 (STAFF ~ b. What kind and amount nfvegetation will beremoved oraltered? does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened orendangered species known tobuonornear the site. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Does not apply, Nolandscaping ioproposed o1this time. ° (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals n. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: does not apply mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: does not apply _____ Dxb: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: does not apply b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF CO C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The plan includes several goals and policies to preserve and enhance wildlife outlined in Chapter 3. (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be .used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF x �..,'; (a b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 10 of23 (STAFF COMM C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The plan includes several goals and policies to conserve energy outlined in Chapter 3. These include: (7.2) Design parks and facilities for operational efficiency and to conserve energy, water, staff time, and other resources; and (7.3) Prioritize quality and durability of materials for all parks capital improvements. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF Revised on 8/19111 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 11 of 23 b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPfa Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 12 of 23 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. does not apply (proposal is for the entire�city) (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) L What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist_PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 13 of 23 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) M (STAFF COMM i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 'Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The plan is based on a thorough review of existing and projected land uses and plans and was developed to further support adopted policies. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 14 of23 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? does not apply (STAFF CO b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? does not apply Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist —PROS —PLAN —120213.doc Page 15 of 23 (STAFF COMM , C. Proposed measures tnreduce nrcontrol aesthetic impacts, Jany: does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare u. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? does not apply (STAFF COMMENTS) 0 0 1 " It". L\ ( "A I q, b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? does not apply C. What existing off-site sources oflight orglare may affect your proposal? does not apply (STAFF d. Proposed measures |ureduce orcontrol light and glare impacts, ifany: does not apply Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist—PROSPLAN-120213.doc Page 16 of 23 !f:7111_��1[K�71IIlI1DIlYKy1 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF CO 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers Known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS)fro^^"� Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist—PROS—PLAN-120213. doe Page 17 gf23 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) E NOl:il[KITI"' Dllf Il.']1 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF CO 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) r (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMEN C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? does not apply (STAFF COMM Revised on 8/19111 P71 - SEPA Checklist_PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 18 of23 d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF C. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) L How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist_PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 19 of 23 (STAFF COMMENTS) ' ,, . ',- ro,�." b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: does not apply (proposal is for the entire city) (STAFF COMMENTS) II a ,.... :>II' : e, L b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Does not apply. No development is proposed at this time. (STAFF COMMENTS) I declare under per-, 'lty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the ad agens relying on them to make its decision. s ^' F .. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted F Revised on 8119111 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 20 of 23 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? New park development or park improvements recommended in this plan may increase the amount of impervious surface, and general construction at that time may result in emissions to air or production of noise. However, no specific plans for construction are proposed at this time and adoption of this plan would not lead to negative impacts on the environment. Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Specific designs and construction methods would, be required to meet City and State requirements at the time of approval. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Plan recommendations are intended to improve habitat quality as projects and programs are funded. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The following are specific actions listed in Chapter 4 of the plan: 3.F Develop and implement a master plan to restore the hydrological and ecological connection of Marina Beach Park to the Edmonds Marsh. 3.G Reinvest in key regional parks (beginning with Brackett's Landing North Park) to sustain the quality of shoreline access, ecological function and visitor experience and potential contribution to economic development. 3.K Secure ongoing funding for the Beach Ranger program, recognizing the important role in tourism, building a connection to the shoreline and expanding appreciation for natural resources and habitat conservation. 4.A Inventory and classify natural resources and habitat areas within of the park system. 4.B Conduct a city tree inventory and map to create a baseline of information to enhance tree canopy. 4.0 Connect new generations of residents and visitors to natural resources in Edmonds through discovery programs utilizing ranger/naturalists. 4.1) Collaborate on public information programs to help property owners (including the City) identify and remove invasive vegetation. 4.E Collaborate with various organizations in invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting in accord with landscaping plans for parks within the city limits. Suggest park maintenance projects that would be good candidates for the annual Arbor Day event sponsored by the Tree Board. 4.17 Provide low impact access to naturai"resource areas to allow for enjoyment and interaction with nature. 4.G Steward the urban forest using appropriate maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal and replacement policies and providing information about urban forestry to property owners. 4.H Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas such as the waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park. 4.I Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Unlikely. The intent of the plan is to promote energy efficiency and improve and conserve natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Along with the specific actions listed in response to Question 2 above, Chapter 4 of the plan provides the following: 7.A Continuously advocate for the resources necessary to adequately maintain the system for long-term sustainability. 7.13 Use appropriate technology to maximize and facilitate day-to-day maintenance activities and tracking. Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 21 of23 TC Adopt and implement updated park design guidelines and policies. Develop master plans incorporating this guidance for all community, regional and special use parks prior to making any improvements. ® Integrate native plants, stormwater filtration and infiltration strategies, low or no pesticide/herbicide techniques, and other wildlife friendly practices into parks design and maintenance. ® Use low impact development (LID) strategies including reuse of materials and low -maintenance, water and energy efficient vegetation and materials wherever possible in redevelopment and new development projects. ® Install well -crafted, low -maintenance, long-lasting products and sustainably -built structures and incorporate art and design elements wherever possible in redevelopment and new development projects. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Unlikely. The intent of the plan is to promote protection of these areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Specifically, Chapter 3 of the plan has a goal and objectives that promote protection of these areas which include: Goal 4: Preserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. Objectives: 4.1 Preserve and protect areas with critical habitat or unique natural features, including but not limited to wetlands, stream corridors, tidelands, beaches and forests. 4.2 Encourage preservation of natural drainage corridors and establishment of rain gardens to allow for infiltration of water into the soil. 4.3 Work cooperatively with property owners and developers to preserve habitat and native vegetation, especially when these provide visual or physical linkages to publicly owned natural resource lands. 4.4 Restore ecosystem function, enhance native vegetation and remove invasive species on public lands. 4.5 Expand the urban forest and increase tree canopy in Edmonds. 4.6 Provide low -impact access to public natural resource lands while retaining ecological integrity. 4.7 Promote direct interaction with nature through environmental education, stewardship, and volunteer activities. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Unlikely. The intent of the plan is to promote uses along the shoreline that are compatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Specifically, Chapter 3 of the plan has a goal and objectives that promote protection of these areas which include: Goal 3: Preserve and expand opportunities for public access and enjoyment of the shoreline in Edmonds. Objectives: 3.1 Develop and maintain the Edmonds shoreline as a unique regional recreational and environmental resource that is key to community identity. 3.2 Increase connections and public access, including visual access, to shoreline areas including but not limited to the waterfront, tidelands, beaches and overlooks. 3.3 Whenever possible, acquire additional waterfront property to enhance the existing public access. 3.4 Encourage development of interpretive elements using arts, design, cultural heritage and natural history as integrated components which highlight shoreline resources. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Adoption of this plan will not directly increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities. Transportation and utility needs of individual projects will be determined at the time of their design when these project are submitted to/by the City. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist PROS PLAN 120213.doc Page 22 of 23 There are several objectives and actions listed in Chapters 3 and 4 of the plan that encourage use of non -motorized transportation modes and that encourage energy efficiency. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Plan recommendations are intended to support local, state and federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment, including habitat and shoreline protectign and energy efficiency and conservation. Revised on 8/19/11 P71 - SEPA Checklist—PROS—PLAN-120213. doe Page 23 of 23