03/19/2002 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
March 19, 2002
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Gary Haakenson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5`" Avenue North, Edmonds, followed by the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Dave Earling, Council President
Jeff Wilson, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Lora Petso, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Richard Marin, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
STAFF PRESENT
David Stern, Chief of Police
Duane Bowman, Development Serv. Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Marin requested Item B be removed from the Consent Agenda.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, FOR
APPROVAL OF THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 1
(A)
ROLL CALL
Approve
3/5/02
(C)
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 5, 2002
routes
Minutes
Approve
(D)
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2002
3/12/02
Minutes
(E)
APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #54051 THROUGH #54193 FOR THE WEEK OF
Approve
MARCH 4, 2002, IN THE AMOUNT OF $193,234.67. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS
Claim
#54194 THROUGH #54352 FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 11, 2002, IN THE AMOUNT
Checks
OF $706,720.97. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #4311
THROUGH #4403 FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 16 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2002,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $762,187.34.
m for
(F)
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM DR. GARY J. JACKY
pages
(Amount Undetermined)
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 1
Admiral
Way
Sanitary (G) REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE ADMIRAL WAY SANITARY
Sewer SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT AND COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
SRl04 to (H) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
nd Ave. S WITH CHS ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE SR104 TO SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
Sewer Main SEWER MAIN REHABILITATION PROJECT
Entry Level
Firefighter (I) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH PUBLIC SAFETY
�Testing TESTING FOR ENTRY LEVEL FIREFIGHTER TESTING
Municipal (,n CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
Judge MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — CITY OF
Contract
EDMONDS MUNICIPAL JUDGE
Item B: Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 1 and 2, 2002.
Councilmember Marin requested the following amendment to the minutes: Page 2, sixth paragraph,
"Councilmember Marin stated he would like to see the Development Services Department head in the
direction of being able too er expedited permits for an additional ee as an option.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING,
FOR APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEM B AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda item approved is as follows:
Approve
2/01/02 (B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 1 AND 2, 2002
Minutes AS AMENDED
Council President Earling expressed his appreciation for the concern shown him by the community in the
past weeks following his heart event. He thanked the Council, employees, and Police Department for the
flowers they each sent and thanked the many others for their thoughts, prayers and cards. He briefly
described his heart event (not searing chest pain but his heart rate accelerated to 250 beats per minute for
an unknown reason), stating his doctor indicated he could return to his normal schedule Is he felt
comfortable doing.
Amend
cDC
3. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN
AMENDMENT TO EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20.91.030,
20.91.030-
Continuances
AUTHORIZING THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT TO ALLOW PROCEDURAL CONTINUANCES
DURING THE CITY COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION OF A PARTICULAR ZONING ACTION
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this was an amendment to the Edmonds Community
Development Code allowing the Council President to continue quasi-judicial matters that are On appeal
to the Council. Continuances must be for just cause and every effort would be made to notify parties of
the continuance. Mr. Chave advised the Planning Board recommends approval of the amendment.
Councilmember Plunkett asked what happens now without the amendment. Mr. Chave answered an
interim ordinance was in place. As an example, the item originally scheduled for tonight (Talbot
Partners LLC) was continued at a previous meeting. Because this was a particularly contentious matter,
the continuance avoided having people attend tonight's meeting expecting the item to be heard.
Adoption of this amendment would make the interim ordinance permanent.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the alternative was for the Council to make that decision on motion
at the hearing. The interim ordinance was enacted to avoid the inconvenience to the public by coming to
a meeting without knowing whether the item would be heard. Mr. Chave explained an example would be
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 2
when one party of record was out of town and it would be difficult for them to argue for a continuance if
they were not able to attend the meeting.
Councilmember Wilson referred to draft language in Section 1 that specifically referred to closed record
appeals, inquiring whether the intent was to include a provision for closed record meetings. Mr. Snyder
answered Regulatory Reform had specific provisions for public meetings, a closed record hearing and an
open record hearing. He said all matters appealed to the Council would be considered close record
hearings under state law.
With regard to the matter in the next agenda item, Mr. Snyder explained the application being considered
was the sole remaining action that would come to the Council on recommendation. The recently enacted
PRD ordinance would require an appeal to the Council. He noted this was a "one of a kind" item. He
noted staff's task list for this year also included a revision of the City's hearing procedures.
Mayor Haakenson asked Mr. Snyder to give further details about Regulatory Reform for the audience.
Mr. Snyder explained for many years, the Edmonds City Council's policy was that the Council would be
the "reviewer of last resort" — all development applications would eventually be heard by the Council. In
the past, the City had a process that provided for hearings before the Architectural Design Board (ADB)
or other City bodies including the City's Hearing Examiner. In the event of an appeal, there was a
second round of hearings before the City Council. When Regulatory Reform was enacted, one of the key
provisions was the limitation in any hearing process to one open record hearing — evidence was accepted
at only one stage in the review process with the City. Under the current City structure and in compliance
with Regulatory Reform, evidentiary hearings are held primarily before the Hearing Examiner and
occasionally before other bodies such as the ADB. In addition to requiring consideration within a
specified time period (120 days), Regulatory Reform also addressed the consolidation of permit
applications. If there are a number of related actions such as SEPA review, ADB review, etc., those
processes are consolidated with only one evidentiary hearing.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation
portion of the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER MARIN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, FOR
APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 3394, AUTHORIZING THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT TO
ALLOW PROCEDURAL CONTINUANCES DURING THE CITY COUNCIL'S
CONSIDERATION OF A PARTICULAR ZONING ACTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The ordinance approved is as follows:
rd# 3394 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING SECTION
Amending
CDC 20.91.030 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE CONTINUANCES AS A
20.91.030- ZONING REGULATION, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
Continuances EFFECTIVE.
4. REPORT ON CONTINUANCE GRANTED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT FOR THE
Continuance: FOLLOWING CLOSED RECORD MEETING:
Closed
Record
Meeting — CLOSED RECORD MEETING REGARDING THE HEARING EXAMINER'S
Talbot RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION BY TALBOT PARTNERS. LLC
Partners FOR A NINE -LOT FORMAL PLAT AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
X
Cyrus (Property Location: 802X Cyrus Place / File Nos. P-01-78, PRD -01-79, and AP -01-165)
Development Services Director Duane Bowman explained a continuance was granted by the Council
President on March 5 in this matter at the request of Gerald Steel, the attorney representing the citizens
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 3
group regarding the application by Talbot Partners LLC for a 9 -lot formal plat and planned 'residential
development. One of the issues Mr. Steel raised was the need for a verbatim transcript of the Hearing
Examiner's hearing. He explained the materials provided to the Council include minutes detailing the
hearings on this matter; however, the minutes were not a verbatim transcript. Options for the Council
include, 1) each Councilmember making a commitment to listen to the nine hours of testimony on seven
tapes (approximate cost — $50 to purchase the tapes), or 2) have a verbatim transcript prepared from the
tapes (approximate cost — $750-$1,000).
Mr. Bowman explained the other issue before the Council was setting the hearing date. The applicant
has indicated they would like to have the hearing scheduled as soon as possible. Mr. Bowman suggested
scheduling the hearing for fifth Tuesday, April 30, or scheduling a special Thursday meeting to consider
only this matter.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained this matter was continued and parties of record notified of the
continuance. He cautioned the Council to limit their discussion to these two procedural issues — how to
review the record and the date of the hearing. Discussion of any other substantive matters must be done
in the presence of the parties of record. He advised on March 14, 2002, the applicant, a representative of
the citizen's group, Council President Earling, and he participated in a conference call where it was
pointed out the Council would be making a decision based on the Hearing Examiner's recommendation
and it was important the Council have the entire record for review. Although the minutes are detailed,
they include paraphrasing and summary and it is possible something has been improperly summarized.
In view of the objection, Mr. Snyder recommended the Council listen to the tapes in their entirety or have
a complete transcript available.
Council President Earling disagreed with waiting until the end of April for the Council to consider this
matter. He asked how long it would take to have a verbatim transcript prepared. Mr. Bowman advised
approximately one week.
Council President Earling suggested the Council consider this matter on April 9, prior to Council
committee meetings.
Councilmember Marin inquired about the tape quality. Mr. Bowman presumed the quality was good,
noting persons speaking at the Hearing Examiner's hearing speak one at a time.
Councilmember Wilson asked who would be responsible for the cost of the transcription. Mr.; Bowman
requested the funds be appropriated from the Council Contingency Fund. Mr. Snyder reiterated this was
a one -of -a -kind matter presented to the Council on a recommendation. He explained normally the
appellant would pay and an appeal would have been filed; in this instance there was no appeal pending.
He advised scheduling the matter for April 9 would allow adequate time for notification.
Councilmember Dawson expressed a preference for a verbatim transcript, pointing out the ability to re-
read sections if necessary which was difficult to accomplish when listening to a tape. She summarized
although it was expensive to prepare, a verbatim transcript would create a better record.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARIN, TO
CONTINUE THE HEARING TO APRIL 9 AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM THE COUNCIL
CONTINGENCY FUND TO PAY FOR THE VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING
EXAMINER'S RECORD, TO BE PREPARED FOR THE COUNCIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 4
Mr. Snyder explained this was a quasi-judicial decision the Council would be making and reminded
Councilmembers they were prohibited from discussing the content of a quasi-judicial matter. He noted
some Councilmembers have received telephone calls from citizens or other persons regarding this
hearing. Under the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, any ex -parte contact should be revealed at the start
of the hearing as well as the substance of any conversation so that the parties can address it. He
suggested Councilmembers keep a log of telephone calls received.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired who would be allowed to speak at the hearing. Mr. Snyder referred to
a copy of a letter distributed to the Council that was sent to the applicant and the Talbot citizens group's
attorney regarding a number of issues. The group's attorney requested a ruling regarding who could
speak at the Council's closed record meeting and Mayor Haakenson had informed the parties that
participation would be limited to parties of record.
Mr. Snyder noted the open public record hearing had been conducted and testimony concluded; that
hearing was the opportunity for citizens to participate, to become parties of record, and to present their
testimony. Under Regulatory Reform, there can be only one open record hearing; therefore, participation
at the next hearing would be limited to parties of record. He explained the letter from the citizen group's
attorney was forwarded to the applicant for response and the Mayor, as Chair, would make a pre -hearing
ruling on that subject. In addition, as there was some question regarding who is a party of record, the
tapes, materials submitted, and sign -in sheets are being reviewed to ensure all parties of record are
notified and their right to participate preserved. He noted any member of the public who was not
represented by the Talbot citizen group or the applicant could obtain a copy of the communications from
the City Clerk.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Carl Pearson, 16311 & 16319 75th Place W, Edmonds, requested Council action regarding the location
Property on of City property on 164`" Street SW. He explained the City was an adjoining property owner to their
164 Street
sw property. He expressed concern with the Planning Division's refusal to identify the boundaries of the
City property. He explained for over two years they have asked the Planning Division to identify where
the road is located but this has not been accomplished. The City's failure to understand or their
unwillingness to state where the public property is located has resulted in the Planning Division's refusal
to process routine applications due to what it claims is an uncertainty of boundaries. He clarified he was
not asking the Council to make any determination regarding private property issues, only that the Council
promptly and fairly state where the street and public right-of-way boundaries are located. He
recommended the Council prepare or have prepared a legal description and survey on the City's property,
known as 164h Street SW between 75th Place W and 72"d Avenue W, that is based on the relationship to
the section line and document any private structures on the public property. He requested this
information be provided to the Council and the community within 30 days.
Property on John Edwards, 7317 164th Place SW, Edmonds, whose property also adjoins 164th Street SW, indicated
1641' Street the location of the road was questionable. He understood two surveys had been prepared that were in
SW
conflict. He said it appeared that possibly 9 -feet should be added to his property, instead when the road
was developed, it may have encroached onto his property and a 12 -foot embankment was constructed.
He asked the City to make a determination where the property line was.
Perry on Ken Long, Western Engineers, indicated he was the surveyor of record who surveyed the Pearson
`h Street property and the Nelson property and the centerline of 164th Street SW as he believed it to be. He noted
there were several surveys, all with different opinions. He requested the Council make a decision
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 5
regarding whether this was a straight road or an angle. His understanding was that it must be a straight
road as it was originally platted. He entered materials into the record.
Ray Martin, 18704 94th Avenue W, Edmonds, observed there had been a "blizzard" of new ordinances
and revisions, as well as a continuance at recent Council meetings. He said features common to these
actions included some were not sufficiently justified, some were short of common sense, and sometimes
the Council was misinformed or misled by false statements. He referred to the proposed Board of
oardIProposof ed Appeals, and the comment made by Councilmember Marin that it would benefit builders, pointing out
[Appeals that under the new ordinance, builders must make appeals to Superior Court rather than to the Council.
He recalled the City's former Board of Adjustments and did not want the Hearing Examiner process
eliminated and the review returned to a Board of Appeals. He challenged Councilmember Marin's
statement that the Board of Appeals was required by the Uniform Building Code.
Fiancefor Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, referred to the question he raised previously regarding
°°°n'i° the City's contract with the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development and his request that the City
evelopment
Attorney comment on whether the Alliance had complied with the contract. He explained there had been
no response from the Council to his request. He noted there were other instances where the Council did
not react to citizens' requests. Unless he received a reaction from the Council regarding his concerns,
Mr. Hertrich felt it his duty to bring forth all public information regarding the original contract, how the
decision was made, and the action the Council took based on an illegal meeting.
Councilmember Plunkett advised Mr. Hertrich that a letter from the Alliance dated March 1, 2002, had
been prepared and was available from the Council office.
Property on Councilmember Plunkett asked Mr. Pearson if he had made a recent request or if the request was made
1641s Street two years ago. Mr. Pearson responded he has been making requests monthly. He explained two years
SW ago, he had a pre -application meeting with the Planning Division who told him what needed to be done to
prepare an application, including a survey that would be submitted with the application. He was told to
have a private surveyor conduct the survey and he hired Ken Long, Western Engineers, to do the survey.
He was told the survey would be used to establish the property lines. He noted over several years, a
variety of surveys had been conducted in that area but none matched; thus it was nearly impossible to
have a uniform survey that resolved all the problems. He submitted the survey on January 12, 2001,
however, the recorded survey was rejected by the Planning Division who stated it was incomplete and
that it was an improper survey. He questioned the process and appealed the staff decision to reject the
survey to the Hearing Examiner. During the June 7, 2001 Hearing Examiner appeal and many times
since, he asked where the City road was located so that he could give instructions to his surveyor
regarding how to document it on the survey. He summarized he has asked numerous times over the past
two years in writing, on the telephone, at hearings, etc. where the City road is located.
Mr. Snyder agreed with Mr. Pearson's statement that there are numerous properties in the Meadowdale
area whose surveys do not align. He noted this problem has been before the Council a number of times
and this was not the first request to be made to the City to locate property markers. He disagreed with
the comment that this was a simple matter, pointing out it was far from simple and should not be handled
via an impromptu public hearing. He offered to provide the Council a complete report to allow the
Council to make a decision how far to go to resolve a widespread property problem in the Meadowdale
area at public expense. He noted whatever decision was made, it would have to be confirmed in Superior
Court and would require title action.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 6
Mr. Snyder pointed out Mr. Pearson has received several determinations with regard to his applications
from the Hearing Examiner that have not been appealed. He suggested staff provide the Council a report,
possibly at a committee meeting. If a public hearing was desired, he suggested it include all property
owners in that area.
lliance for Councilmember Petso recalled there had been repeated requests to have the City Attorney review the
[Economic City's contract with the Alliance and asked Mr. Snyder to do this. Mr. Snyder agreed to review the
evelopment tY hy 3' �
contract.
6. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF MARCH 12, 2002
ublic Safety Public Safety Committee
Committee Councilmember Petso reported staff presented a proposed contract for conductingentry level firefighter
testing. She noted this was cost neutral but would improve the City's applicant pool when hiring new
firefighters. This item was approved on tonight's Consent Agenda.
Community Community Service/Development Services Committee
Services/ Councilmember Marin reported the committee discussed the Team Edmonds marketing proposal. Team
Development
Services Edmonds will provide an update on their marketing efforts to the Council in April. Next, the committee
Committee discussed an amendment to the employee parking permit; staff was directed to bring the revised
ordinance to Council with the committee's support. A presentation was made to the committee regarding
disabled parking in downtown. The findings will be submitted to the City's Traffic Engineer and if time
allows, he will review the material, return it to the CS/DS committee and the parking committee and
eventually to the full Council. The committee then reviewed the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
and committee members expressed their appreciation for the excellent work staff presented.
Finance Committee
finance Councilmember Orvis reported a presentation was made to the Finance Committee regarding a proposed
ommittee merger of AT&T Corporation and Comcast Corporation. The only issue was the City Attorney is
currently negotiating with AT&T regarding providing additional video equipment. Next, the committee
considered a request by the Police Department for approval to pay a 2001 invoice for traffic collision
reconstruction software from the 007 Fund. This will be presented to the Council as a budget
amendment. The committee then continued theirdiscussion regarding the Edmonds Historical Museum
who is gathering further information from the Edmonds School District as well as on how to dispose of
items in storage. The committee then discussed a potential future benefit for City employees but it was
determined there was some risk to the City and there was little interest in this benefit.
Councilmember Orvis reported the committee discussed GASB 34 and the firm the City was using for
consulting. The next agenda item was an update of staff's development of a utility financial plan which
is scheduled for completion in May 2002. The final agenda item was a discussion of potential revenue
sources. Staff is gathering additional information and this discussion will be continued at the next
Finance Committee meeting.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson welcomed Council President Earling back to the Council.
8. COUNCIL. COMMENTS
nation Council President Earling announced Councilmember Plunkett was appointed as the Council
mission representative to the Edmonds Historical Preservation Commission.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 19, 2002
Page 7
Councilmembers Wilson and Orvis welcomed Council President Earling back.
xcused COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
bsence EXCUSE COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING FROM THE JANUARY 26 AND MARCH 6
COUNCIL MEETINGS. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING ABSTAINED.
xecuhve
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A REAL ESTATE MATTER
Session
At 7:55 p.m., Mayor Haakenson recessed the Council to an Executive Session regarding a
matter scheduled for 15 minutes. He advised no action would be taken and the Council wou
immediately following the Executive Session.
I estate
adjourn
"...4. ,' C4.
SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council
Minutes
19, 2002
Page 8
AGENDA
- EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North
7:00 - 10:00 p.m.
MARCH 19, 2002
7:00 p.m. - Call to Order
Flag .Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Consent Agenda Items
(A) Roll Call
(6) Approval of City Council Retreat Minutes of February 1 and 2, 2002
(C) Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 5, 2002
(D) Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 12, 2002
(E) Approval of claim checks #54051 through #54193 for the week of March 4,
2002, in the amount of $193,234.67. Approval of claim checks #54194 through
#54352 for the week of March 11, 2002, in the amount of $706,720.97.
Approval of payroll direct deposits and checks #4311 through #4403 for the
period February 16 through February 28, 2002, in the amount of $762,187.34.
(F) Acknowledge Receipt of Claim for Damages from Dr. Gary J. Jacky (Amount
Undetermined)
(G) Report on Final Construction Costs for the Admiral Way Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation Project and Council Acceptance of Project
(H) Authorization for Mayor to Sign Professional Services Agreement with CHS
Engineers, Inc. for the SR104 to Second Avenue South Sewer Main
Rehabilitation Project
(1) Authorization for Mayor to Sign Contract with PublicSafetyTesting for Entry
Level Firefighter Testing
(J) Confirmation of Mayor's Appointment and Authorization for Mayor to Sign
Contract for Professional Services - City of Edmonds Municipal Judge
Page 1 of 2
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
March 19, 2002
Paae 2 of 2
3. (10 Min.) Public Hearing on the Planning Board Recommendation to Approve an
Amendment to Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.91.030,
Authorizing the Council President to Allow Procedural Continuances During the
City Council's Consideration of a Particular Zoning Action
4. (20 Min.) Report on continuance granted by the Council President for the following
Closed Record Meeting:
Closed Record Meeting regarding the Hearing Examiner's recommendation for
approval of an application by Talbot Partners, LLC for a nine -lot Formal Plat
and Planned Residential Development. (Property location: 802X Cyrus Place /
File Nos. P-01-78, PRD -01-79, and AP -01-165)
The Council will consider the format of the record, and will set the date for a
new Closed Record Hearing.
5. Audience Comments (3 Minute Limit Per Person)
6. (15 Min.) Report on City Council Committee Meetings of March 12, 2002
7. ( 5 Min.) Mayor's Comments
8. (15 Min.) Council Comments
9. (15 Min.) Executive Session Regarding a Real Estate Matter
ADJOURN
Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities.
Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771-0245 with 24 hours advance notice for special accommodations.
The Council Agenda as well as a delayed telecast of the meeting appears on AT&T Cable, Channel 21.