02/28/1989 City CouncilTHESE MINUTES SUBJECT TO
MARCH 7, 1989 APPROVAL
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 28, 1989
(WORK MEETING)
The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Larry
Naughten at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds. All present joined in the flag salute.
* PRESENT
Larry Naughten, Mayor
Bill Kasper, Council President
Steve Dwyer, Councilmember
Roger Hertrich, Councilmember
Jo -Anne Jaech, Councilmember
John Nordquist, Councilmember
Jack Wilson, Councilmember
Dave Berdine, Student Rep.
CONSENT AGENDA
STAFF
Mary Lou Block, Planning Div. Mgr.
Jack Weinz, Fire Chief
Peter Hahn, Comm. Svc. Director
Bobby Mills, Public Works Supt.
Bob Alberts, City Engineer
Dan Prinz, Police Chief
Mike Heryla, Fire Fighter
Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coord.
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Jackie Parrett, City Clerk
Margaret Richards, Recorder
COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following:
(A)
ROLL CALL
(B)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 21, 1989
(C)
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PERMIT WITH
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD FOR THE SIDE
SEWER CONNECTION FOR MEADOWDALE MARINE
(D)
AUTHORIZATION TO REPLACE UNITS #2 (1981 FORD
COURIER-45,000 MILES) AND #4 (1976 DODGE
PICKUP--49,000 MILES) AND PURCHASE TWO 1988
DODGE ONE -TON FLATBED DUMP TRUCKS FROM THE
WASHINGTON STATE VEHICLE PURCHASING CONTRACT
($28,717.98)
(E)
AUTHORIZATION TO REPLACE UNIT N37 (1979 FORD
PICKUP) AND PURCHASE A 1988 CHEVROLET
PICKUP FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE VEHICLE PURCHASING
CONTRACT ($11,273.75)
Mayor Naughten noted that Item 13 on the agenda, Continued Hearing to Receive Information from
Staff on Height of Fence in Connection with Appeal of Hearing Examiner Decision Regarding the
Granting of a Conditional Use Permit, was inadvertently placed on the agenda and was rescheduled
on March 7, 1989. He said all parties have been notified.
Mayor Naughten said that hearing was not intended to be open for discussion to anyone other than
the Council. He noted, however, that Mr. Clark requested that he be allowed seven minutes to
respond to the information he was given the night of February 21. Mayor Naughten said if the
Council grants Mr. Clark's request, then the applicants and their attorney must be extended the
same courtesy.
Councilmember Nordquist inquired who conducted the fence measurement. Planning Division Manager
Mary Lou Block replied Jerry Saterlie and Rick Schipanski.
City Attorney Scott Snyder clarified that both the applicant and appellant would have an opportu-
nity to respond to the fence measurement, but Mr. Clark was requesting an additional seven min-
utes to testify.
Because the Council felt the parties should have an opportunity to address the information that
was received on February 21, COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO
ALLOW EACH THE APPELLANT AND APPLICANT FIVE MINUTES TO TESTIFY.
Councilmember Hertrich inquired if that time allotment was strictly to address the information
that was received on February 21. Councilmember Wilson replied affirmatively.
Mr. Snyder noted that the Council had previously made a motion to allow each party a brief oppor-
tunity to discuss the fence measurement.
* See Council Minutes of March 7, 1989
MOTION CARRIED.
CWC-HDR MONTHLY TREATMENT PLANT REPORT AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 7
Because a representative from CWC-HDR was not present, this item was discussed following item #7.
CONTINUED COUNCIL STUDY OF ELDERLY HOUSING DESIGN AND FINANCING OPTIONS
Because the representatives were not present, this item was discussed following item k6.
DISCUSSION OF REQUEST BY MERCHANTS FOR DECORATIVE STREET LAMPS FROM MAIN ST. TO DAYTON ST.
Mayor Naughten said several downtown business people have approached the City with a proposal to
expand the decorative lighting program to include 5th Avenue from Main to Dayton and share in the
cost of the lights only on an equal basis. He said the cost of the lights is approximately
$1,300 each, but the cost of installation is approximately $2,500. Mayor Naughten said it is the
recommendation of Staff to approve a policy of cost participation of 50/50 between the merchants
and the City, with installation costs borne by the City.
Jim Morrow, Edmonds Bookshop, said the following merchants are requesting that the City pay for
installation of the lights because those lights will be eventually installed as part of the down-
town lighting program: Dave Earling, Edmonds Realty; Jerrilyn Brusseau, Brusseau's; Betty Mor-
row, Edmonds Bookshop; and University Savings. He pointed out that the'merchants will benefit if
the City accepts their offer because the lights will be installed sooner than anticipated by the,
City and the City will benefit by decreasing its costs.
Mr. Morrow said the merchants were unaware of the additional cost to install the lights and may
not be as enthusiastic to share that cost with the City.
Councilmember Wilson encouraged the Council to seriously consider the merchants' offer because he
said the lights will more than likely be installed in that area in the next several years anyway
by the City. He suggested, however, that installation of those lights be deferred until Staff
determines that the decorative lights in other locations, once installed, are satisfactory.
COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO ACCEPT THE MERCHANTS' OFFER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE COST OF THE LIGHTS. MOTION CARRIED.
REPORT ON 1989 ROADS POLICY AND PROJECTS AND APPROVAL OF FEDERAL AID PROJECTS
Mayor Naughten recommended that the Council approve the following items: Action No. 1) concur
with Mayor's recommendation to decline acceptance.of the $1.5 million Public Works Trust Fund; 2)
approve the two Federal aid project agreements for resurfacing of two arterials (212th and Olym-
pic View Drive) under Federal `aid; and 3) review the Mayor's proposed policy deciding the proper
combination of overlaying and chip sealing and the 1989 streets list.
COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO CONCUR WITH THE MAYOR'S RECOM-
MENDATION TO DECLINE ACCEPTANCE OF THE $1.5 MILLION PUBLIC WORKS TRUST FUND. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER NOROQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE THE TWO FEDERAL AID
PROJECT AGREEMENTS FOR RESURFACING OF TWO ARTERIALS (212TH AND OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE) UNDER FEDERAL
AID. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Hertrich inquired if $260,000 has already been expended on the Federal aid
projects. City Engineer Bob Alberts replied negatively. He explained that the funds are re-
tained by the State and allocated to the City as needed.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilmember Hertrich inquired from what fund the chipseal program would be funded. Mr. Alberts
said $30,000 will be derived from the Council Contingency Fund but must be transferred to the
Public Works Maintenance Fund.
Mr. Alberts clarified that the money in the Arterial Street Fund can be used for any street in
the City, but the money in the Federal Aid Project Fund can only be used for streets listed on
the Federal Classification System.
Mr. Alberts said approximately $500,000 will be expended to overlay City streets. Councilmember
Kasper inquired about the chipseal program. Mr. Alberts said approximately $30,000 will be ex-
pended to chipseal City streets. He explained that any streets that were previously
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2 FEBRUARY 28, 1989
constructed of asphalt or that had curbs and gutters will be overlayed; streets that were previ-
ously constructed of oil and rock will be chipsealed, or overlayed if necessary. Mayor Naughten
said Staff did not feel it would be appropriate to chipseal dead-end streets with curbs because
it would not be aesthetically appealing, but the majority of other areas with curbing should be
overlayed. Because of budget constraints, Councilmember Kasper felt that through streets should
be overlayed before dead-end streets because they are more heavily traveled. He pointed out that
Daley Street was chipsealed successfully. Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills said Daley
Street was chipsealed last year. He said Staff experienced difficulty in chipsealing roads this
year because the rock that was purchased from Meridian Contractors was the wrong kind of materi-
al. He said chipsealing a cul-de-sac would not be effective because a greater number of cars use
cul-de-sacs than dead-end streets, and when they turn around the gravel loosens.
Councilmember Hertrich felt that the cracksealing and chipsealing program should be more exten-
sive because it would eliminate the need to overlay cul-de-sacs. He said he was more concerned
with overlaying arterials and collectors than smaller streets. Mr. Alberts said last year was
the first time that the City engaged in a cracksealing program. He said Staff learned from that
process and will be able to crackseal more streets in the same amount of time that it took last
year. Councilmember Hertrich felt the City should invest in preventative maintenance, i.e.,
cracksealing, so that overlaying those same streets to prevent deterioration in the future will
not be necessary. Mr. Mills said all City roads will be cracksealing on a five-year cycle.
Councilmember Nordquist inquired what the proper combination of chipsealing and overlaying would
be, as noted in the Mayor's recommendation. Mayor Naughten said the general policy that Staff
recommended was that arterials and roads with curbs (roads that are more heavily traveled) be
overlayed and streets which used to be County streets and those that are not heavily traveled be
chipsealed.
COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH, TO TABLE ITEM V-3. MOTION FAILED
WITH COUNCILMEMBER KASPER AND COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH IN FAVOR.
COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED POLICY
FOR THE PROPER COMBINATION OF OVERLAYING AND CHIPSEALING, AND THE 1989 STREETS LISTS (MAYOR'S
RECOMMENDATION #3) BUT THAT STAFF SUBMIT A PROGRESS REPORT TO THE COUNCIL IN SIX MONTHS.
Councilmember Hertrich felt the Mayor's recommendation should be discussed further in order to
determine whether or not to expand the chipseal program.
MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH AND COUNCILMEMBER KASPER OPPOSED.
Councilmember Kasper pointed out that the Council had previously agreed to chipseal all non -
arterial streets, when possible.
COUNCILMEMBER DWYER MOVED TO TRANSFER $30,000 FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND TO THE PUBLIC
WORKS OPERATING FUND AND $91,000 FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND TO THE ARTERIAL STREET FUND.
Councilmember Jaech said she would rather wait to transfer the monies until the bids were re-
ceived.
In response to concern by Councilmember Kasper, Councilmember Wil,spn.said the list for road main-
tenance did not appear to be consistent. Mr. Alberts explained that streets that were originally
constructed of oil and rock will be chipsealed and streets that were originally constructed of
asphalt will be overlayed; where a conflict exists with resurfacing and utility projects and
resurfacing must be done prior to installation of the utility, the street will be chipsealed with
the understanding that the street will be overlayed after the utility is installed. If the utili-
ty is not installed in the near future, the street will be resurfaced.
MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
CONTINUED COUNCIL STUDY OF ELDERLY HOUSING DESIGN AND FINANCING OPTIONS
Councilmember Kasper said the matter was continued from July 19, 1988 and January 24, 1989 to
explore a variety of elderly housing options, including mixed income level facilities, financing
limitations, and the ramifications to the community if congregate housing is constructed.
Ed Betham, financial consultant, said Federal financing used to be available to construct low-
income elderly housing but only market interest rates are available to private developers who
wish to construct congregate care facilities.
* See Council Minutes of March 7, 1989 and March 21, 1989
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3 FEBRUARY 28, 1989
Councilmember Kasper inquired if low-income housing could be constructed at the present time.
Mr. Betham replied affirmatively. Councilmember Kasper inquired if the government would subsi-
dize the cost to purchase land for a facility of that nature. Mr. Betham said financial assis-
tance from the government is no longer available to private developers, only to nonprofit organ-
izations.
Mr. Betham said he believed that congregate care should be available to Edmonds residents but he
anticipated that their annual income levels would have to be at least $20,000 in order to support
such a facility.
Councilmember Hertrich inquired about the definition of congregate care. Mr. Betham said congre-
gate care is a HUD term which is defined as a facility with central dining and a central kitchen.
Mr. Betham said a maximum of forty-three units can be constructed on a one -acre parcel and a
parking ratio of 1 to 4 would be adequate.
Councilmember Jaech said the Council had questioned what the parking ratio should be for a congre-
gate care facility with amenities and six to eight staff members. Charles Morgan, Charles Morgan
& Associates, said a smaller facility, i.e., 30 to 40 units, cannot sustain a facility with full
amenities. He said most congregate care facilities with amenities range from 80 to 100 units,
noting that 100 units is considered to be ideal from a management standpoint. Mr. Morgan said an
80 to 100 unit facility should be staffed with 12 to 15 employees, and the ideal parking ratio is
60% to 70%. He pointed out that the residents only use approximately 25% to 35% of that allotment
and the remainder is for staff and guests.
Mr. Morgan said as an architect, it has been his experience that city planning departments put
proposals for a congregate care facilities on the back burner.
Councilmember Wilson inquired what type of zoning is best suited .for a congregate care facility.
Mr. Morgan said developers like to construct those facilities as close to the downtown core as
possible as a convenience to the residents. He said those areas are typically high -density zon-
ing or commercial zones and are extremely expensive. Mr. Morgan said bonus densities and reduced
parking are necessary in those areas in order to build an affordable facility. He said a facili-
ty located downtown would alleviate the necessity of the required parking in those zones because
the residents would not require the use of an automobile because they could walk to their destina-
tions.
Mr. Betham said lower interest rates are available through the Washington State Housing Financing
Commission with tax exempt bonds. He noted, however, that rental of 20% of the units must meet
50% of the median income, which equates to approximately $400 per month.
Councilmember Kasper inquired if the Washington State Housing Financing Commission required HUD
insurance. Mr. Betham replied affirmatively. He said HUD insurance enables developers to obtain
a triple A rating on bonds. He said Ginny Mae mortgage backed security financing is available to
developers but the interest rate is 11.89%.
Mr. Betham said congregate care facilities were typically designed as studio apartments in the
late 1970's. However, residents now prefer at least one bedroom and they are being designed as
such.
Councilmember Wilson inquired about the number of congregate care facilities that are not success-
ful. Mr. Betham said he did not think many facilities failed. However, he advised any developer
who intended to construct a congregate care facility to have ample financial resources because he
said the units do not rent out at the same rate as apartments do. He said apartments are typical-
ly rented at approximately 15 units per month whereas congregate care facilities rent at approxi-
mately 5 per month. In addition, he said HUD requires an operating deficit which would approxi-
mate $300,000 to $400,000 for a 100 unit facility plus a 2% working capital.
Councilmember Dwyer inquired if there was any way to guarantee that the successor be a congregate
care facility if the facility failed under the ownership of one person. Mr. Morgan said it is
almost impossible to convert a congregate care facility to another use. Mr. Betham added that
another form of financing could be sought if difficulties were encountered.
REVIEW RESCUE BOAT POLICY
Fire Chief Jack Weinz noted that a policy was included in the Council packets for the water res-
cue boat.
Councilmember Hertrich introduced Sam Marsh. He said he has been the skipper of a tug boat for
many years and is very familiar with water rescue and related emergencies.
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4 FEBRUARY 28, 1989
Mr. Marsh suggested that the rescue team be authorized to administer emergency medical treatment
to someone on board a vessel in Edmonds' waters and not just to someone in the water. He noted
that Captain Martinson of the Coast Guard is very interested in Edmonds proposal and is willing
to offer assistance in training the team.
Mr. Marsh said although Captain Martinson believed that a three-man team was a good concept, he
did not think the crew should be restricted to operating with only two members in the event that
a medical emergency arose and the two members were ready to respond but the third member was not
available. Fire Fighter Mike Heryla agreed that a two -man team would be adequate in some instanc-
es, but he said he would like to retain a three-man team for situations requiring expediency. He
noted that the Coast Guard will be notified in all emergency situations and their assistance
requested if the situation is beyond the capabilities of the rescue boat crew.
Mr. Marsh highly recommended that the boat be moored at the marina because he said difficulties
would be encountered launching the boat at Brackett's Landing. He said if the tide was low, the
crew would have to carry to boat across a considerable distance of beach and then row out to
deeper water, or if there was a strong northwest wind the boat could not be launched. He noted
that the boat will be most needed in inclement weather. Mr. Marsh said the fastest response to a
diver in distress would be for the dive team to enter the water from the ferry dock.
Councilmember Jaech inquired if the rescue boat will be inflated at all times. Mr. Heryla re-
plied affirmatively.
In response to comments by Mr. Marsh, Mr. Heryla said the boat has collapsible wheels so launch-
ing at Brackett's Landing will be possible. He said the most Feasible place to store the boat
would be at Brackett's Landing because most of the.emergency situations arise in that area. He
added that the boat manufacturer recommended that the boat be sheltered rather than exposed to
the elements.
Chief Weinz said Staff cannot obtain a firm price to construct a facility at Brackett's Landing
until bids are received.
Mr. Marsh inquired about the specifications of the boat. Mr. Heryla said the boat is a seventeen
foot rubberized inflatable boat. Mr. Marsh highly recommended that the Council consider purchas-
ing a hard -bottom boat. He stressed the difficulties that would be encountered to launch the
boat at Brackett's Landing when the weather is not calm. Councilmember Wilson inquired about the
cost of a hard -bottom boat. Mr. Heryla said an inflatable hard -bottom boat costs over $40,000.
He said the manufacturer recommended the boat that Staff has presented to the Council because it
is best suited for the use that it is intended for by the City and is more in keeping with the
budget.
COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED RESCUE
BOAT POLICY. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY OF
MOORING THE RESCUE BOAT AT THE MARINA. MOTION CARRIED.
REVIEW OF PROPOSED FIREWORKS ORDINANCE 2704
Fire Chief Jack Weinz felt that steps must be taken to regulate the use of fireworks because prob-
lems are encountered every year around the 4th of July.
He noted that an ordinance was included in the Council packets that is similar to the ordinances
passed by Bellevue, Bothell, Kirkland and Redmond. The key changes in the ordinance are: 1) the
sale of legal fireworks within the City from licensed stands will be from noon on June 28th until
9 p.m. on July 4th only; 2) legal fireworks may be discharged within the City on July 4th only
between 9 a.m. and 11 p.m.; 3) it is unlawful to sell fireworks to anyone under sixteen years of
age; and 4) the permit fee for selling fireworks will be $100.
City Clerk Jackie Parrett noted that a public hearing has been scheduled in the near future re-
garding the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Hertrich said he would like to see bottle rockets banned from the City. Chief
Weinz said it is illegal to discharge bottle rockets within the City. City Attorney Scott Snyder
noted that it is unlawful to sell, possess, or set off bottle rockets within the City.
Councilmember Wilson inquired about the consequences to a concessionaire if he/she sells fire-
works to anyone under sixteen. Chief Weinz said their permit will be revoked.
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5 FEBRUARY 28, 1989
CWC-HDR MONTHLY TREATMENT PLANT REPORT AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 7
City Engineer Bob Alberts addressed the issue because a representative was not present.
y Mr. Alberts said Amendment No. 7 was included in the Council packets in the amount of $77,986.
Amendment Mo. 7 is for inspection and contract management for the installation of the outfall
pipeline and new meter stations. He noted that those services were not in the original agreement.
Councilmember Hertrich inquired if additional power will be necessary at the secondary wastewater
treatment plant. Mr. Alberts replied negatively.
COUNCILMEMBER DWYER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 7
AND RESCHEDULE THE REPORT FROM CWC-HDR FOR NEXT WEEK. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER KASPER
AND COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH OPPOSED.
MAYOR
Mayor Naughten noted that a large audience attended that Chuck Yaeger performance at the Edmonds
Community College recently.
/✓ COUNCIL
Council President Kasper inquired if the Council wished to discuss the issue of service club
signs further. The Council replied affirmatively.
Council President Kasper noted that the Chamber has requested the Council to join in the promo-
tion of Edmonds Night with the Sonics on March 18th.
Student Representative Dave Berdine inquired about the City's progress with respect to the high
school merger. Mayor Naughten said a letter has been drafted to the School District, which will
7� be sent tomorrow. He said a copy of the letter will be disseminated to twenty-five different
groups of people asking them to respond to the situation and asking for their support.
Councilmember Nordquist inquired if the Council has retained a Council Resource Person yet.
Council President Kasper replied affirmatively. He said the assistant, Jo Pendergast, started
work on Monday.
Councilmember Nordquist recalled that the Council had formerly discussed creating a seat on the
City Council if Esperance was annexed. Mayor Naughten clarified that the discussion was that a
representative from Esperance would be elected to serve on the Council if a vacancy occurred.
Councilmember Wilson inquired how the City could have spent $750 for refreshments for the
groundbreaking ceremony at the secondary wastewater treatment plant. Mayor Naughten said a siz-
able crowd attended the ceremony and the event was catered.
Councilmember Jaech asked Staff for a Police Department report in an Executive Session at the
next Council work meeting.
Councilmember Dwyer inquired about the status of the Hearing Examiner position. Council Presi-
dent Kasper expressed concern because he said the Hearing Examiner's contract expires on March
31st and the deadline for applications for the position is also on March 31st. He said Mr.
Driscoll was interested in retaining the position. Councilmember Hertrich added that Mr.
Driscoll has to plan his schedule and time is of the essence. Councilmember Wilson pointed out
that the Council was supposed to have resolved the issue within ninety days and that time period
is about to elapse. He recommended that Mr. Driscoll's contract be renewed. Mayor Naughten said
he is preparing a report to the Council on this subject for next week's meeting.
Councilmember Hertrich noted that the Edmonds High School Swim Team placed second in the double A
meet at the University of Washington and their Medley Relay Team took first place in the State.
He proudly announced that his son is on that team.
The meeting recessed to an Executive Session at 9:28 p.m. to discuss a legal matter and adjourned
th-nftnr
THESE MINUTES ARE SUBJECT TO MARCH 7, 1989 APPROVAL.
JACQUELINE G. PARRETT, City Clerk
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN, Mayor
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6 FEBRUARY 28, 1989
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
PLAZA MEETING ROOM - LIBRARY BUILDING
7:00 -- 10:00 P.M.
FEBRUARY 28, 1989
WORK MEETING - NO AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE
1. CONSENT AGENDA
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 21, 1989
(C) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN PERMIT WITH BURLINGTON
NORTHERN RAILROAD FOR THE SIDE SEWER CONNECTION FOR
MEADOWDALE MARINE
(0) AUTHORIZATION TO REPLACE UNITS #2 (1981 FORD COURIER-45,000
MILES) AND #4 (1976 DODGE PICKUP--49,000 MILES) AND PURCHASE
TWO 1988 DODGE ONE -TON FLATBED DUMP TRUCKS FROM THE WASHINGTON
STATE VEHICLE PURCHASING CONTRACT ($28,717.98)
(E) AUTHORIZATION TO REPLACE UNIT #37 (1979 FORD PICKUP) AND
PURCHASE A 1988 CHEVROLET PICKUP FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE
VEHICLE PURCHASING CONTRACT ($11,273.75)
2. CWC-HOR MONTHLY TREATMENT PLANT REPORT AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT
AMENDMENT NO. 7
3. CONTINUED HEARING TO RECEIVE INFORMATION FROM STAFF ON HEIGHT 'OF
FENCE IN CONNECTION WITH APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION REGARDING
THE GRANTING OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FENCE OVER 6' IN .HEIGHT
AT 9826 CHERRY ST. (APPELLANT: BYRON CLARK) (CU-57-88/AP-26-88)
(CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 21, 1989)
4. CONTINUED COUNCIL STUDY OF ELDERLY HOUSING DESIGN AND FINANCING OPTIONS
5. DISCUSSION OF REQUEST BY MERCHANTS FOR DECORATIVE STREET LAMPS
FROM MAIN ST. TO DAYTON ST.
6. REPORT ON 1989 ROADS POLICY AND PROJECTS, AND APPROVAL OF FEDERAL
AID PROJECTS
7. REVIEW OF PROPOSED FIREWORKS ORDINANCE 2704
8. REVIEW RESCUE BOAT POLICY
9. MAYOR
10. COUNCIL
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION - LEGAL ISSUE
(10 MINUTES)
(20 MINUTES)
(40 MINUTES)
(15 MINUTES)
(15 MINUTES)
(15 MINUTES)
(15 MINUTES)
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND
PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE