Loading...
08/01/1989 City CouncilTHESE MINUTES SUBJECT TO AUGUST 15, 1989 APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 1, 1989 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Larry Naughten at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT Larry Naughten, Mayor Bill Kasper, Council President Steve Dwyer, Councilmember Laura Hall, Councilmember Roger Hertrich, Councilmember Jo -Anne Jaech, Councilmember John Nordquist, Councilmember Jack Wilson, Councilmember STAFF Mary Lou Block, Planning Div. Mgr. Art Housler, Admin. Svc. Director Peter Hahn, Comm. Svc. Director Linda McCrystal, Arts Coordinator Bob Alberts, City Engineer Bobby Mills, Public Works Supt. Scott Snyder, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, City Clerk Margaret Richards, Recorder Council President Kasper presided over the Consent Agenda items because Mayor Naughten was a few minutes late. Councilmember Wilson arrived a few minutes late and did not vote on approval of the Consent Agen- da. CONSENT AGENDA Items (C) and (G) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following: (A) ROLL CALL (8) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 25, 1989 (0) ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2730 PROVIDING FOR A FEE ON CHECKS RETURNED FOR NONSUFFICIENT FUNDS (E) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT METER STATIONS (F) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM MR. AND MRS. JAMES DOUGHTY ($267.54) AND JOHN AND-SHELLEY GITHENS (UNKNOWN AMOUNT) p � (H) AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN APPRAISALS FOR COMPENSATION OF EASEMENTS ON THE SHELL CREEK ( BY-PASS ALIGNMENT PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROVIDING THAT CHANGES TO STREET NAMES WILL BE HEARD AND VOTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL LITEM C ON THE CONSENT AGENDAJ Councilmember Hall said signage was needed on Olympic Avenue to differentiate the two streets that are named Bell Street so that emergency staff are not confused about their destination in an emergency situation. Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills said he would discuss the issue of duplicate street names with the Fire and Planning Departments. Councilmember Hertrich was concerned that the ordinance does not provide for a public hearing. Councilmember Dwyer inquired how the public will be notified of a change in a street name. Plan- ning Division Manager Mary Lou Block said people whose businesses or homes are on a street that is proposed to be changed will be notified. She noted that a street name change request general- ly emanates from a people who have homes or businesses on that street. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if Staff might encounter difficulties locating an address on a street that changes its name somewhere along the roadway. Ms. Block said street names and loca- tions are coordinated amongst the services. City Attorney Scott Snyder noted that action as required by the proposed ordinance is a legisla- tive proceeding and not a hearing so there is no required notice, although Staff typically noti- fies people who will be affected as a courtesy. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO APPROVE ITEM (C). COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOVED TO AMEND, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO INCLUDE A PUBLIC HEAR- ING WITH NOTIFICATION. MOTION CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED. (The ordinance will be redrafted and returned for adop- tion.) APPROVAL OF COMP TIME POLICY FOR EXEMPT PERSONNEL [FTEM (G) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA] Councilmember Hertrich said he had a concern about one of the provisions of the policy but the City Attorney assured him that that item was not the item that the Council was being requested to approve at the present time. City Attorney Scott Snyder stated that paragraph 5.2 of the policy (the item that Councilmember Hertrich questioned) is not required by the Fair Labor Standards Act for exempt personnel. He said the Council was not voting on that section of the policy at the present time (section 7.0 was the section under consideration.) COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO APPROVE ITEM (G). Councilmember Kasper inquired if Item (G) provided a review process at the end of the year. City Clerk Jackie Parrett noted that that request was stated in the minutes (July 25, 1989,;page 7). MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Mayor Naughten opened the audience portion of the meeting. No public input was offered. Mayor Naughten closed the audience portion of the meeting. INTRODUCTION OF JAPANESE HOME STAY STUDENTS FROM HEKINAN Mayor Naughten stated that the official student delegation of ten students and one teacher ar- rived in Edmonds on Saturday, July 29. Carole Nowak of the Edmonds Sister City Commission has arranged a host family for each student and the teacher, as well as social activities for the students and their host families. Mayor Naughten introduced Jack Dublin, Chairman of the Sister City Commission. Mr. Dublin introduced the students as follows: Manami Fujii, Azusa Sugiura, Yasuko Ishikawa, Kaori Tsuboi, Jiro Miyamoto, Masahiro Sugiura, Yuko Ichigo, Misuzu Nakamura, Satoko Maeda,and Takaaki Mizuno. He then introduced the host families: MaryAnn and George Wolf, Mel and Sue Ready, Sid and Hilda Green, Quentin and Nelli Carr, Dale and Karen Carey, Don and Michelle Carr, Inar and Enna Peterson, Bruce and Dia Bock, John and Nita Maringer, and Nigel and Julie Stevens. He also introduced the teacher, Fumio Suzuki. Mr. Suzuki said he had heard that Edmonds is a nice place to visit, and after being in Edmonds he believed that to be true. He said he loves Edmonds. Mr. Suzuki said the exchange program will promote a better relationship between the United States and Japan. Mr. Ready said he just returned from Hekinan, Japan and met the students when he was there. He said the U.S. delegation was met by two government officials at the airport, and the officials and four interpreters assisted the delegation for most of their visit. Mr. Ready was impressed with the English skills of the Japanese students, and he said they were anxious to speak English whenever the opportunity arose. Mr. Ready said although some of the family members of the host family he stayed with did not speak English, he had a fantastic rapport with them. He said Mr. Suzuki described the relation- ship well when he said it is a heart-to-heart relationship. Mr. Ready said the people of Japan are extremely gracious and hospitable and have made an indeli- ble impression in his mind. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 AUGUST 1, 1989 Mayor Naughten said the exchange program has been a wonderful experience for many of the Edmonds residents and Hekinan residents. He added that the program would not be successful without the host families. Mayor Naughten said one of the goals of the Sister City Program is to expand it to other coun- tries. PRESENTATION OF EDMONDS ARTS COMMISSION'S ART SCHOLARSHIPS Ann Saling, Edmonds Arts Commission, noted that candidates for the scholarships must have at least a 3.0 grade point average (GPA). St?e said the recipients of this year's scholarships had higher GPA's than 3.0 and are also active in several events, such as varsity track, cross coun- try, honor society, student government, Sunday school teacher, surrogate sister, Cascade Sympho- ny, etc. Ms. Saling presented the scholarships with Mayor Naughten's assistance to: Jennifer Nash, Edmonds High School - Performing Arts; Karen Abrams, Meadowdale High School - Literary Arts; and Deonne Brown, King's High School - Literary Arts. Mayor Naughten noted that Karen Abrams is a former Student Representative to the City Council. HEARING ON WESTGATE STUDY RECOMMENDATION {POSTPONED FROM JUNE 20) Planning Division Manager Mary Lou Block reported that the Westgate Planning Study was last re- viewed by the Council on March 14, 1989. At that time, there were a few changes requested by Councilmember Nordquist. She said those changes have been incorporated into the current document and are shown in Exhibit 2, Table of Development Standards and Uses, which was included in the Council packets. Also included in the Council Packets was the Implementation Program. Councilmember Wilson inquired about the changes that were made. Ms. Block said funeral homes have been listed as a prohibited use in the following proposed rezone categories: regional neigh- borhood business, neighborhood business, and planned neighborhood business zones. For the benefit of the audience, Ms. Block said a survey of property owners in the Westgate area was conducted in the Spring of 1986. Because of concerns voiced at that time, the Mayor appoint- ed the Westgate Committee to review the development trend in Westgate. After the study was com- pleted, recommendations were made and implemented. Ms. Block said the Committee also recommended that a study be conducted to review the issue of land use and zoning of Westgate to bring it into conformance with the developing character of the area. Ms. Block said the Planning Board conducted a site visit of Westgate, reviewed the Committee recommendation, studied the City and County Comprehensive Plans and zoning maps and reviewed aerial photographs. Ms. Block said as a result of their studies and public hearings, the Board drafted the plan document that is before the Council. Ms. Block introduced Jeff Palmer, Chairman of the Planning Board, and Bill Allen, Planning Board member, in the audience. Ms. Block said the Planning Board concluded: 1) that the Westgate intersection has developed beyond a neighborhood zone and, consequently, the businesses tend to be more regional in nature than neighborhood; 2) the planned use of the SR104 corridor in the County is proper; 3) the topog- raphy and road characteristics along the corridor support multifamily development with single family development to be maintained along the plateaus; 4) commercial areas should be limited to those which exist and are shown in the Comprehensive Plan except where a rezone could be demon- strated to be in the public interest. Ms. Block pointed out on a vicinity map the areas that are in transition and which the Planning Board felt would benefit from changes in the Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning (the trian- gular area north and west of the Westgate intersection between 102nd Place and 226th Street and the area south of the intersection of SR104 and 100th where Happy Burger and Bickford's are). Mr. Palmer said the Planning Board is not recommending a more intense commercial zone, but their recommendations recognize existing uses and development patterns that have occurred in the area. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the hearing. Bruce Fife submitted a statement to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council (marked Exhib- it 1). EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 AUGUST 1, 1989 Mr. Fife, representing property owners in the triangular area proposed for rezone, said that area is zoned BN and the owners of the businesses do not understand why that area is proposed for a rezone. He said the area in question is separated from the residential area by an 80 foot bank. He said the owners felt a rezone would limit the type of business that is allowed and, therefore, would impair the economy of existing businesses. Mr. Fife said the planting strip in the middle of SR104 prohibits access to the businesses. He said removal of that strip and providing a left-hand turn lane into the businesses is essential to the economic vitality of those businesses. Councilmember Dwyer inquired what type of business the existing business owners would like to be developed in the triangular area that they think would not be allowed if a rezone took place. Mr. Fife replied a family restaurant, bank, an office or a small retail business. Bruce Johnson, 10406 - 226th Pl. S.W., said his property borders one of the business properties in the triangular area, and it is level with that property (there is not an 80 foot bank at that location). Mr. Johnson said the planting strip is aesthetically appealing and serves as a pedestrian island for people crossing SR104. He thought that removal of the strip would only create more traffic problems. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Nordquist said there is a lack of adequate parking facilities in the Westgate ar- ea. He pointed out that the plan document does not address the parking impact of the proposed zones. Councilmember Hertrich said it was incumbent upon the Council to review each proposed zone to ascertain if those areas will be appropriately designated. He was fearful that an enhanced busi- ness zone at Westgate would detract shoppers from the downtown area and would create a financial hardship for downtown business owners. Councilmember Dwyer recommended that the Council, as a whole, take a tour of Westgate to see what exists in the areas that are proposed for rezone. Councilmember Hall recalled that Westgate was reviewed by the Planning Board in the past, and their intent was to preserve that area as a BN zone. She felt that the basic document was good. She suggested that the Council take action in the near future or they would find themselves with "their backs to the wall". A tour of Westgate by the Council was scheduled on August 29, 1989. HEARING ON HARBOR SQUARE BINDING SITE PLAN (P-1-89) Planning Division Manager Mary Lou Block reported that on July 2, 1989, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the request of the Port of Edmonds and Harbor Square Associates regarding a binding site plan to cover the existing improvements in the Harbor Square development. The Hear- ing Examiner issued his report on July 17, 1989 recommending approval of the binding site plan, subject to conditions listed in his report. Ms. Block noted that a copy of the Hearing Examiner's report and a site plan were included in the Council packets. Ms. Block said this is a paper action. All development has been approved by the City and is consistent with the contract rezone on the property. She said it is Staff's recommendation to adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve the binding site plan for Harbor Square. Ms. Block reviewed the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner as follows: 1) joint parking agree- ments shall be required between all leased parcels on site. These parking agreements shall be submitted to the City Planning Department for review and approval; 2) the applicant shall comply with all mitigating conditions as listed in the Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance that was admitted as Exhibit 4; 3) the applicant shall comply with all the terms of the contract rezone that have been recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in File #8005060198; 4) a walkway shall be constructed along the southern edge of the undeveloped parcel and along the northern edge of the open space parcel adjacent to the marsh; 5) the marsh area shown in the site plan shall re- main undeveloped. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 AUGUST 1, 1989 Councilmember Hertrich inquired if construction of the walkway has been completed. Ms. Block replied negatively. She said a portion of the sidewalk was constructed when Harbor Square was developed, but the area adjacent to the undeveloped land does not have a sidewalk but it is to be completed within a year or with development of the sidewalk per the mitigation measures of the Declaration of Nonsignificance. Nick Verewolf, attorney representing Harbor Square Associates, was present to answer any ques- tions by the Council. In response to a question by Councilmember Kasper, Mr. Verewolf said the original lease by Harbor Square Associates from the Port includes all of the presently developed areas of the parcel, but the undeveloped area is still retained by the Port and not under lease. Councilmember Kasper inquired if development plans are in existence for the undeveloped area. Mr. Verewolf replied negatively. Councilmember Kasper inquired about access to that parcel. Mr. Verewolf said the only access is through the public road system of the development itself. L Ms. Block said there are two designations of zoning established for Harbor Square under the con- tract rezone: general commercial and open space (the .area which parallels the marsh). Council - member Hertrich inquired if the walkway is included as part of the open space. Ms. Block said it is located on the north edge of the 20 foot buffer, which is the open space. Councilmember Hertrich inquired if the undeveloped area is included in the binding site plan. Ms. Block re- plied affirmatively. Councilmember Hertrich inquired about the development standards for that parcel. Ms. Block said the standards are the same as the standards for the remainder of the site (general commercial standards with certain limitations). Mr. Verewolf said the binding site plan does not change any uses of the property as it is present- ly used or limited in use; it only formalizes the segregation of properties so there is a legal description of each of the leased parcels within the facility. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the hearing. Dick Hill, 1242 Coronado Pi., inquired if the undeveloped parcel is the land that is advertised for lease by the Port of Edmonds in the newspaper. Mr. Verewolf assumed that was the parcel that was advertised. He noted that any development of that parcel must comply with the contract re- zone proyisions, and any potential use of that parcel is not changed by a binding site plan. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. In response to a question by Councilmember Jaech, City Attorney Scott Snyder said all conditions of the contract rezone and prior grant approval attach to the land unless they are specified to relate only to a certain area. He said the Council is being asked to draw lines between the economic sectors in Harbor Square so that the business owners can obtain financing based upon a lease that describes only their particular segment or area. Councilmember Dwyer asked what criteria the Council should refer to to determine whether or not to approve the binding site plan. Mr. Snyder said the City's subdivision criteria was the Coun- cil's best guide. He stated that a binding site plan is established by RCW 58.17, which is the platting statute, as an alternative to platting and is intended for areas where there are either ground leases or a series of ownership lease arrangements to permit the segregation of parcels within unplatted land. Councilmember Kasper was concerned about the ultimate use of the undeveloped area and access to it. Mr. Snyder said in addition to the building permit application process, the City would con- duct the usual SEPA review, and traffic concerns could be addressed at that time. Councilmember Kasper inquired how improved access could be provided to the undeveloped parcel after the binding site plan is approved if traffic circulation problems occur. Mr. Snyder said when the develop- ment plans and contract rezone were approved, the City vested certain rights in the property owners. He said it was his understanding that no negative traffic impacts on adjacent public streets have been identified. Mr. Snyder said the Council should refer that issue back to the responsible official at the present time if they are concerned about traffic circulation. If that issue is addressed at a later date, he said SEPA review mitigation measures will be a devel- opment tool but are very limited. Mr. Snyder said it is premature to impose mitigating measures on the undeveloped area because the use of that parcel is unknown. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 AUGUST 1, 1989 Councilmember Jaech pointed out that Harbor Square has the potential to be shortplatted and to be under the control of more than one person. She was concerned that circulation problems could occur in the future, particularly with respect to the undeveloped area, and the City would have limited ability to remedy the situation once the binding site plan is approved. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH, TO REMAND THE ISSUE TO STAFF TO CONDUCT A TRAFFIC STUDY FOR ON -SITE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND INGRESS AND EGRESS. Councilmember Hall recalled that the State D.O.T. stated in the past that access to Harbor Square could be provided from SR104. Because the SEPA process is time consuming and the applicant is on a limited time frame, Mr. Snyder said an alternative would be to continue the hearing and request the developers to prepare a traffic study themselves. Because the Council wanted to ask additional questions of Mr. Verewolf, COUNCILMEMBER JAECH WITH- DREW THE MOTION. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO REOPEN THE HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Verewolf clarified that a binding site plan must be in existence or a division has to occur in order for the undeveloped area to be developed. He said the purpose of the binding site plan is to provide descriptions of the individual parcels within Harbor Square so they can be recorded. Mr. Verewolf noted that the Port of Edmonds is a joint applicant of the binding site plan. Mr. Snyder inquired if the applicant, Harbor Square Associates, would accept a condition of bind- ing site plan approval which would permit the City to review the circulation and parking pattern within the project as a whole at the date that an application is made for a building permit for the undeveloped area in order to allow the Council to review it as part of the environmental review process. Mr. Verewolf said he believed that would be acceptable. Councilmember Jaech inquired if another proviso would be acceptable that the .condition be binding on any future own- ers of any parcel that could be sublet. Mr. Verewolf conferred with his client, Dick Beselin. Dick Beselin, Harbor Square Associates, stated that no complaints regarding traffic problems have ever been made to the Associates. With that in mind, he concluded that traffic circulation in Harbor Square is adequate. Mr. Beselin said the condition on the binding site plan as proposed by Mr. Snyder could be detri- mental. He used as a hypothetical situation if a post office that generated heavy traffic were constructed on the undeveloped area such scenario could result in having to remove existing build- ings to create more parking. Mr. Beselin said the proposed binding site plan unifies the already -approved contract rezone. He said the plan will allow business owners in Harbor Square to obtain better financing. He said the binding site plan is essential because the lender who has made a commitment for financing has discovered that State law requires an approved binding site plan before the loan can be executed. Mr. Verewolf said a binding site plan will not and cannot change the road system at Harbor Square. He said traffic issues can be addressed through the use that is allowed on the undevel- oped area when a building application is submitted to the City. Councilmember Dwyer asked what the most intensive use of the undeveloped area could be. Ms. Block said the uses are prohibitive and are restricted to uses allowed in the CG zone. Councilmember Hall stated that the City must honor the contract rezones that were effectuated, and she believed the contract rezone of Harbor Square would be violated if the condition posed by the City Attorney was incorporated as part of the binding site plan. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO ADOPT THE HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE BINDING SITE PLANJOR HARBOR SQUARE. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCIL - MEMBER JAECH OPPOSED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 AUGUST 1, 1989 �,�,a� PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING DEFINITIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS "A 0 Community Services Director Peter Hahn reported that the City Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance which exempts alleys from the full requirements of street standards. Mr. Hahn said the Planning Board reviewed the proposed ordinance on July 26. The Board generally supports the ordinance but questions whether the word "secondary" is necessary. The Board feels that the definition of alleys should be amended to be consistent with the ordinance. Mr. Hahn said it is Staff's recommendation to adopt the proposed ordinance. As a procedural matter, Mayor Naughten adjourned the meeting at 10 p.m. COUNCILMEMBER HALL -MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO REOPEN THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Hertrich inquired to what policy Staff has referred with respect to alleys. City Engineer Bob Alberts said Staff recognizes that alleys were initially dedicated for parking for residential structures, which allows two parking spaces in an alley per lot. He said any new development which requires more than two spaces is required to improve the alley to street stan- dards or the alley must be designated one way. Councilmember Hertrich said a substandard street will be created if the word "secondary" is omit- ted.from the proposed ordinance and a development uses an alley as primary access rather than the street frontage. City Attorney Scott Snyder stated that because the design of a structure and its orientation to a street is subject to Architectural Design Board review, the structure can only overburden an alley and be off of the alley if the Board or Council approves it that way. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 2731 AND OMIT THE WORD "SECONDARY" FROM THE ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH OPPOSED. ,J Mr. Snyder submitted to the Council proposed Findings of Fact for the Harbor Square development. He said Findings usually appear on the next Council agenda, but because the applicant was under strict time lines and the Council was simply adopting the Hearing Examiner's recommendation, he felt that interim step could be eliminated. Unless the Council had an objection to the Findings, he recommended that the Mayor be authorized to sign the Findings. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS AS PRESENTED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR P-1-89 (HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION ON JULY 17, 1989). A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, COUNCILMEM- BER HALL, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST AND COUNCILMEMBER WILSON IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBER HERTRICH AND COUNCILMEMBER JAECH OPPOSED. The Council recessed to an Executive Session at 10:07 p.m. to discuss a personnel matter and adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. THESE MINUTES ARE SUBJECT TO AUGUST 15, 1989 APPROVAL. JA UELINE G.. ARRETT, City Clerk ARRY NAUGHTEN, Mayor EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL PLAZA MEETING ROOM -LIBRARY BUILDING 7:00 - 10:00 P.M. AUGUST 1, 1989 6.15 P.M. - INTERVIEW MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT TO PARKS & RECREATION MANAGER POSITION CALL TO ORDER FLAG SALUTE 1. CONSENT AGENDA (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 25, 1989';_a`' (C) PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2730 PROVIDING THAT CHANGES TO STREET NAMES WILL BE HEARD AND VOTED UPON BY CITY COUNCIL (D) PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2731 PROVIDING FOR A FEE ON CHECKS RETURNED FOR.NONSUFFICIENT FUNDS (E) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT METER STATIONS (F) ACKNOWLS FOM MR. AND EMRS. JAMESDGMENT OF RDOUGHTY ($267ECEIPT OF I54)MS FAND OR DJOHN£ANDRSHELLEY GITHENS (UNKNOWN AMOUNT) (G) APPROVAL OF COMP TIME POLICY FOR EXEMPT PERSONNEL (H) AUTHORIZATION TO OBTAIN APPRAISALS FOR COMPENSATION OF EASEMENTS ON THE SHELL CREEK BY-PASS ALIGNMENT 2. AUDIENCE 3. INTRODUCTION OF JAPANESE HOME STAY STUDENTS FROM HEKINAN 4. PRESENTATION OF EDMONDS ARTS COMMISSION ART SCHOLARSHIPS 5. HEARING ON WESTGATE STUDY RECOMMENDATION (POSTPONED FROM JUNE 20) 6. HEARING ON HARBOR SQUARE BINDING SITE PLAN (P-1-89) 7. PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2732 AMENDING DEFINITIONS OF STREETS AND ALLEYS 8. MAYOR 9. COUNCIL THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE ( 5 MINUTES) ( 5 MINUTES) (45 MINUTES) (30 MINUTES) (15 MINUTES)