Loading...
19640519 City Council MinutesDIRECTOR OF CIVIL DEFENSE 1 • Colonel Thomas J. Marnane It was announced that Paul McKay had advised the City that -May 129 was the date -that bids would be opened by -the State Highway for paving of 5`- C"? DISCUSSION OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Mayor Maxwell told the council that he had written the Dept. of Commerce and Economic Development to put a 30 day hold on the Capital Improvements program for Edmonds. A copy of the letter sent by the Dept. to Clark, Coleman, Rupeiks stated the project had been suspended indefinitely. The cost.of the project was to be $16,000 more or less, with the federal grant leaving $5613.00 to be paid by the City, which has already been sent. It was brought out that 75% of the City's share could be in the form of services rendered by City personnel under this program. It was suggested that Mr. Syvertson, perhaps in con- junction with Mr. Fraser, (financial advisor to Edmonds on the Lynnwood sewer proposed agreement), might be asked to give recommendations on a capital improvements program, which council agreed the city would need in the future. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Olds that the City cancel the Capital Improvements Program. (This would mean asking for a refund of the City's $5613.00). There was a good deal of discussion both pro and con, and a roll call vote was asked for. Councilmen Olds, Tuson, Slye and Bevan voted for the motion; Christensen and Sorenssn against; Councilman Harrison abstained. The motion carried. REPORTS FROM COUNCIL COMMITTEES Councilman Sorensen stated that the Street Committee would like to ask the City Supervisor to secure an -appraisal of the property on 76k w. and 2449 S.W. for asking council approval to purchase. • There was no further business, and the meeting was ddjourned. City Clerk �ayor May 19, 1964 ROLL CALL Regulat meeting was called to order by Mayor Maxwell. All councilmen were prevent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES All councilmen having received copies of the minutes of the last meeting, the Mayor called for any additions or corrections. Councilman Christensen asked for the following corrections and additions: Under Approval of Minutes, he wished his reason for voting against the Albertson rezone to state that "he favored denying the appeal for rezone because there wasn't a sufficient showing to warrant over -ruling the Planning Commission's decision in light of the comparatively -recent adoption of the comprehensive plan for the area." In the section on Awarding of Bids on Waterworks Materials, it should be added that Mayor Maxwell felt that we should not accept the low bid of the John Davidson Co. as it was Canadian pipe, "and we should favor American made goods even if at a slightly higher price." • Also, Councilman Christensen suggested that the following reasons be given in support of awarding the bid to the low bidder: 11(1) that they were the low bidder, (2) they had made favorable bids before and should be encouraged to continue, (3) the U.S.A. has a favorable trade balance with Canada, and (4) the Washington state economy is closely linked with that of British Columbia." Under the section "Discussion of Capital Improvements Program", Councilman Christensen asked that after the motion that the City cancel the Capital Improvements Program, it be added that "against the motion, it was pointed out that the City requires this type of professional -planning in order to match its potential future financial resources against its financial needs; that this calls for the services of a professional planner; that we should not terminate our agreement with Clark, Coleman, Rupeiks this abruptly without giving them the courtesy of a hearing in the matter and without having any clear idea what alternative arrangements the city would make to handle the problem. It was recom- mended that the council hold a hearing on the subject, inviting Mr. Rupeiks to explain further the need for services of the type we had contracted for with his firm, and that we seek the advice of Mr. Syvertson before deciding on a definite course.of action." Mayor Maxwell then declared the minutes approved as corrected. R/W FOR FORSYTH LANE Wayne Jones reported that Mr. H- B. Sund, owner of the property in question on Forsyth Lane, had said that he would be willing to dedicate a 15 ft- strip for R/W from 5M to 6k providing he would be charged with no future assessments for improvementsof the.street. After some discussion, it was moved by Councilman Sorensen!- seconded by Councilman Bevan that the city accept the 15 ft. R/W from 5tb to 0 from Mr. Sund, and in return agree to reimburse Mr. Sund the amount of any future street assessment. Discussion then brought out that the rough estimate on an assessment for this property could possibly run as high as $850.00- • • Also, would this agreement apply to any future owner of this piece of property, should Mr. Sund no longer own it? After more discussion, the motion was withdrawn, and the Attorney was instructed to draw a Resolution which would clarify these points, and then have assurance that Mr. Sund would be in agreement before any action is taken. STATE HIGHWAY PAVING OF 5' Mayor Maxwell announced that the contract had been let by the State Highway for paving of 5R Avenue S., and the work should begin soon. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was received from the Algoma Garden Club asking what plans the City had for the beach property formerly owned by Eathel Thayer. The Club had offered to beautify the area, but had'been asked to hold off until the City decided what it would do in regard to the. buildings on the property, etc. The ladies of the Club were present, and it was suggested by Councilman Christensen that the council welcome. constructive ideas on all aspects of beautifying our park properties, as well as that on the waterfront. Mayor Maxwell stated - that for this summer, the City's plans for the Thayer property included putting steps in, taking the rocks off the beach, putting up a fence and temporary lavatory facilities, and possibly a drinking fountain and faucet. A copy of a letter sent to the Board of Adjustment from the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce was read, asking that no variance to the present requirements as to off-street parking in the central business district be granted to Alfred Holte for the property on the S.W. corner of 5th and Bell, and that no variances be granted until such time as adequate off- street parking is provided, and in operation for the whole central business district. A letter from the District Manager of the Social Security Administration announced that • a Social Security Agent will be at the Edmonds Civic Center on the first Monday of each month from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon, beginning June 1, on a tentative basis. ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR $15.00 WATER DEPOSIT A motion was made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Olds that Ordinance #1054 be passed, providing for a deposit of $15.00 for the domestic use of water by users other than the owner of the premises: Motion carried. ORDINANCE ANNEXING COUNTY STREETS A motion was made by Councilman Sorensen, seconded by Councilman Slye that Ordinance #1055 be passed, annexing the following county streets to the City of Edmonds: All those unin- dorporated portions of 9a Ave. S. (100A Ave. W.) lying between the southerly city limits of the City of Edmonds, in the vicinity of the plat of Twin View Estates, and State Highway No. 104 (Edmonds Way). All that portion of llk' Ave. (96k' Ave. W.) from the south line of Lot 89 Block 79 Alderwood Manor No.9 to Elm St. (220A S.W.). All those unincoporated portions of 761h Ave. W. lying south of 206A to 21CM St. S.W. Motion carried. PETITION RECEIVED FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT Petitions were then presented to the council for complete street improvements on 15a Ave. S. from Bowdoin Way to Fir St.; on Juniper St. from 159 Ave. S.W. approximately 500 ft; and on Pine St. from 1414 Ave. S. to 15k Ave. S. There were several people present who objected to this proposed improvement, and they were asked to submit their names and addresses so that the council could determine how many property owners are �for, and how many against going ahead with the mechanics to begin a project of this sort. • REPORT ON AWC CONVENTION IN SPOKANE D. C. Lawson reported on two impressive speeches given at the AWC annual convention in Spokane, which he and Councilman Harve Harrison attended. APPRAISALS ON 76k W. Mr. Earl Stay had appraised the property on 76. W. north of the county line, and.D. C. Lawson stated he had the figures from him. SHIFT OF ROADWAY ON LID 123 Mayor Maxwell told the council that the City was in the process of trying to shift the roadway to the south on Pine between 7111 and 8k while the LID is being put in, which would straighten the street and avoid taking the entire front yard from one property. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING ON LID #124 It was moved by Councilman Christensen, seconded by Councilman Slye that the date for hearing on the final assessment roll for LID #124 be set for July 7. Motion carried. AUDIENCE A gentleman from Soundview Place told the council that the area near his home is a game bird refuge, and the state law declares no bird dogs shall run loose there from April 15 to August 15. He complained that the area was over -run with dogs of all breeds, and the bird population was decreasing. He favored a leash law, and asked if something could be done about all the dogs. He mentioned that some of the dogs were unlicensed, so the Mayor asked Mr. Lawson to have the Pound Master check that area. 0 o6l: DISCUSSION ON THE BIDS FOR PIPE Mayor Maxwell announced that he did not award the contract for pipe to the John Davidson Co., and that he had returned their certified check. He added that the City had a stockpile of pipe that°they would use for this particular project near the hospital, and that the 400 to 500 more feet needed would be purchased by negotiation, so the job would not be delayed. Councilman Christensen disagreed with the Mayor's action, and he made a motion, seconded by :.. Councilman Bevan, that the council over -ride the Mayor's veto and move to proceed as orig- inally decided (by 5 to 2 vote) to award the bid to John Davidson Co. The Mayor refused to recognize the motion, and ruled it out of order. Attorney Murphy was asked by Councilman Christensen for the legal standpoint on this, and was told that he would look into it, but for the present, the motion was redundant, as it was the same motion in essence as the one made originally to award the bid. Councilman Harrison mentioned that the Mayor -Council form of government allowed this two-way control, where the Mayor can veto council decisions. Attorney Murphy wasasked if he would look -into the law to see what action, if any, the council could take on this matter, and he said he would. There was no further business, and the meeting was June 2, 1964 ROLL.CALL adjourned. or Regular meeting was called to order by Mayor Maxwell with all councilmen present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Copies of minutes of the last meeting having been mailed to all councilmen, the Mayor asked for any omissions or corrections... There being none, Mayor Maxwell declared the minutes would stand approved as written. HEARING TO WIDEN ERBEN DRIVE Hearing had been held over from the last council meeting for widening of Erben Drive between 414 and 59 to a 40 ft. R/W. Mr. Bill Wilboni representing both Mr.... Branstetter and Mr..: Williams, owners of the properties involved, spoke against the widening. The two property owners.were also present, and spoke briefly - they did not wish to give up the 20 ft. strip.along the edge of their properties. Councilman Sorensen,.Chairman'of the Street Committee_ explained that this would merely be put on the plan for the future, in case.for example, an apartment house went in, and this development would then need a road of greater width than at present., It was moved by Councilman Sorensen and seconded by Councilman Olds that Erben Drive between 4t and 514 be added to the comprehensive street plan as a 40 ft. R/W. Since the council did not seem to be in full agreement on this question, a roll call vote was taken. Voting for the motion were Olds, Slye and Sorensen; against it were Harrison, Tustin, Christensen, and Bevan. 4 no, 3 yes, and the motion failed to carry. AUDITING OF BILLS A motion was made by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Christensen that the regular monthly bills be paid, and the City Clerk be authorized to draw warrants on the proper funds. Motion carried. Councilman Slye moved, seconded by Councilman Christensen that the two bills against LID #124 be paid: James A. Murphy, $150.00 for second half legal fees, and contractor's final estimate to Ech's Burner Oils for $313.84 (retainage). Motion carried. It was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Christensen that the bills against LID #123, paving of 8A, Pine, Fir, and "B" be paid: contractor's estimate #1 to Joplin Paving Co., in the amount of $5149.80, and first half attorney's fee to James A. Murphy in the amount of $875.009 and that the City clerk be.authorized to issue interest bearing warrants in the total amount of $6024.80 to Grande & Company, Inc. for payment thereof. Motion carried. PETITION FOR PROPOSED LID A petition had been received at the last council meeting asking for an LID for paving of 15'h S. from Bowdoin Way to Fir, Pine from 14M to 15a, and on Juniper from 15k S.W. approx- imately 500 ft. A petition had since been presented for council study in opposition to this improvement. It appeared that approximately 28 property owners were for, and 25 against, which seemed not to be enough of a majority in favor. Therefore, after discussion, it was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Tuson that no action be taken on the petitions at this time, and if the people involved wanted to submit another petition at a later date, the -council would consider it. Motion carried. PROTEST OF BUILDING PERMIT FOR DAIRY QUEEN There was a delegation of people in the audience who had come to protest the issuance of a building permit to Dairy Queen at the triangle on Edmonds Way at Paradise Lane. They de- clared that this would not only be a nuisance to people living in the area, but also would create a definite traffic hazard. They were advised that.there was no simple answer to this, since the building permit could not legally be denied by the City, of Edmonds, this area having been zoned R-C since 19.'j6 which allows a self -enclosed restaurant. The property, owners were further advised that they could appeal the building permit to the Board of Adjustment, but that the best action they could take would perhaps be to approach the owner and see if he would 1 1 • • 1 1 •