Loading...
19660405 City Council Minutes280 PETITION FOR SEWER LID, WEST PORTION OF UNIT # 4 A petition was received for sewering of an area in the west portion of proposed sewer Unit # 49 and this was turned over to the City Engineer for study and a report. REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO RETAIN FINANCIAL CONSULTANT C7 A proposal from Carlton Nau of Foster & Marshall in connection with the estimated million dollar water and sewer expansion program for Edmonds was received and read by the Mayor, wherein Foster & Marshall would study and prepare a prospectus for financing of this program. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye that the Mayor be authorized to enter into agreement with Foster & Marshall as outlined in their proposal of March 79 1966. Motion carried. REQUEST FOR VACATION OF OLIVER LANE (70h AVENUE W.) A petition was received requesting the vacation of Oliver Lane, or 749 Ave. W. Xt was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Olds that the Attorney be instructed to draw a Resolution setting a hearing date for the proposed vacation of a portion of Oliver Lane, known as Lots 5 and 69 Block 1, and Lots 5 and 6. Block 2, Oliver Park Addition. Motion carried. The meeting was then recessed to Wednesday evening, March 23 at 8:00 P.M'. March 23, 1966 RECESSED MEETING Recessed meeting was called to order by Mayor Maxwell at 8:00 P.M. in the Court Chambers with Councilmen Harrison, Tuson, Slye and Kincaid present. Bids had been opened on March 23 at 2:00 P.M. in the office of the Mayor for the construction of the,12" cast iron watermain from 244A S.W. & Fremont Avenue to 220* S.W. & 88A. Present at bid opening were the Mayor, City Clerk, City Supervisor, City Engineer, and representatives from bidding companies. The bids were: COMPLETION BY MAY 27 ADD FOR COMPLETION BY APRI L 30 Oxford & Cook, Yakima $939700.00 $1009000.00 (69300.) Bert Robison Construction Co. 659980.00 79500.00 Taylor Utilities Construction Co. 469815.00 19500.00 Mallory Co., Woodinville 52,660.00 539660.00 (19000.) Duwamish Associates, Inc. Felix Mazzaferro 56,680.00 49,240.00 No addition 1000.00 in price. It was recommended that the low bid be accepted, with the completion date of April 30.• A motion was made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by both Slye and Kincaid that the bid for construction of the pipe line be awarded to Taylor Utilities C.onstruction.Co. for the amount of $48015.00 for an April 309 1966 completion date. Motion carried. There was nothing further to come before the meeting, and it was therefore adjourned. City Clerk ayor April 5, 1966 ROLL CALL Regular meeting was called to order by Mayor Maxwell with all councilmen present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the meeting of March 15 had been posted and mailed, and since there were no omissions nor corrections, they stood approved as presented. HEARING - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION OF INTENTION #195 Hearing was held on the preliminary assessment roll for Resolution of Intention #195, pro- posed sewers for Alder from 8�' to 9k and 0 from Walnut to Maple. Engineer Wayne Jones explained the scope and cost of the project and the zone and termini method of assessment. Hearing was then opened.. There were no written protests. Mr. Paul Roy inquired about protests, and was advised the manner they were handled and submitted. Mr. Rose stated that he felt the cost was high for this improvement. All those in the audience were given a chance to comment, and the hearing was then closed. A motion was made by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Tuson that proposed Ordinance #1187 be passed, creating LID #145, for sewering Alder from 814 to 9k and 8a from Walnut to Maple. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor, and the motion carried. HEARING - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION OF INTENTION #196 Hearing was held on the preliminary assessment roll for Resolution of Intention #1969 proposed water mains for 164k S.W., the Meadowdale area. Engizi,eer Wayne Jones explained the scope and cost of this project. There were no written protests, but several letters in favor of the proposed project were read. Hearing was then opened. Mr. Neeley, 164m S.W., owner of approximately 236 acres on the proposed improvement, protested having to pay an assessment when several new homes now being built would not be assessed, but would 28 benefit from his putting in the water line. He felt he was therefore being assessed unfairl v • P g g Y� and Mrs. Neeley also voiced this opinion. A property owner on 16414 asked where the location of the fire hydrants would be. There was some discussion about enlarging the project. Mr. Neeley stated that he would not be opposed to the assessment if the project were enlarged to put everyone in the vicinity on a 6 inch line and hage everyone to be benefited assessed. Everyone in the audience was given opportunity to voice an opinion, and the hearing was then closed. It was moved by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Tuson that proposed Ordinance #1188 be passed, creating LID #1469 and a roll call vote carried unanimously in favor. Mayor Maxwell:then advised all the protestors that there was now a 30 day protest period in which to file written protests with the City Clerk. This statement had also been made following passage of the Ordinance following the first hearing of the evening. HEARING - PROPOSED STREET VACATION FOR SEA LAWN DRIVE Hearing was opened on a proposed street vacation for a portion of Sea Lawn Drive, retaining an easement and reserving the right of the City to exercise and grant easements for public utilities and service thereon. There was no one in the audience who wished to speak in regard to the vacation, and the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that proposed Ordinance #1189 be passed, vacating the portion of Sea Lawn Drive. Motion carried unanimously. HEARING - APPEAL FROM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #160 - REZONE DENIAL ON HEMLOCK Hearing was opened on the Appeal from Planning Commission Resolution #1609 wherein they recom- mended the denial of a rezone. from RS-6 to RMH a parcel of property on Hemlock, as described in Planning Commission File R-2-66. Attorney Alfred Holte represented the petitioners. He stated that the property across the street and on the west side of the subject property was zoned multiple, and he felt the requested rezone would conform to the comprehensive plan and -would be an improvement to -the property. The petitioners, Gwinn Investments, Inc. and S. L. Saindon, proposed to erect a 20 unit building on the site, if rezoned.: Mr. Holte felt that this would • meet a need for people who wished to have all the comfotts of owning a home and not raving the, responsibilities of one. Mr-. John Kruger, attorney representing residents in the area, .filed a petition signed by the opposition to the rezone. He stated -that Hemlock is a - narrow sheet and doesn't lend itself to 20 or more residences, all with the need for parking spaces, and he felt it would be spot zoning to put this proposed RMH zone in the middle of a residential neighborhood. He added that it would seem to be to the advantage of one person or corporation, rather than that of the majority, to rezone the area when all the residents surrounding the property in question were opposed to this. Mr. Holte stated that in regard to the parking problem, there would be adequate off-street parking for the condominium. He also added that no view in Edmonds is guaranteed when J. Wm. Goulder objected to the rezone on the grounds that it would cut off the view from property he owns. Mrs. Horning, Homeland Drive, also was present and objected to the rezone. All who wished to speak in regard to the rezone appeal were given the chance to do so, and the hearing was then declared closed. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that Planning Commission Resolution #160, recommending the denial of a rezone from RS-6 to RMH in File R-2-66 for Hemlock be upheld, and the rezone appeal denied. During the discussion, both 6ouncilmen Olds and Kincaid felt that the Planning Commission should take a closer look at the comprehensive plan, especially in regard to the multiple zoning areas. A roll call vote was then taken on the mot-ion•for upholding the denial, with all councilmen voting in favor except Bevan, and the motion carried. HEARING - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #158 - REZONE RECOMMENDATION - Hearing was opened on Planning Commission Resolution #1589 recommending rezone from RML to BN property south of Edmonds Way and east of 990 as described in Planning Commission File R-23-65- Dr. Hoover, petitioner for the rezone, stated that he had purchased the property when it was county and zoned for business, and'then when the city comprehensive plan was made up, it turned out his property had become residential, so he wanted to have it returned to the original zoning. No one else wished to speak for or against, and the,hearing was closed. A motion was made -by Councilman McGinness, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that proposed Ordinance #1190 be passed, • to rezone the property south of Edmonds Way and east of 91' from RML to BN in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution #158. A roll call vote resulted in 5 councilmen in favor; Olds and Harrison against, and the motion carried. At this point, Councilman McGinness stated that he felt there should be better coordination between the county and the City in regard to proposed zoning by the county of properties adjacent to, or within a mile of, Edmonds city limits; that when the city annexes areas, it should have had some voice on the zoning or rezoning of the area prior to annexation. It was agreed that the Snohomish County Planning Commission be advised that the City of Edmonds wished to -be notified of any hearing on rezoning of property in our immediate vicinity. HEARING - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS #161 AND #162 - COMPREH. PLAN & REZONE Hearing was opened on Planning Commission Resolutions #161 and #162,•recommending amendment to the comprehensive plan and rezone from RS-8 to BC of 4 lots at the north end of Oliver Lane, as described in Planning Commission Files CP-2-66 and R-1-66. Two property owners on 74j4 Place W. spoke and stated they wished to have the street dead -ended and be assured by the petitioners that the rest of the lots would remain residential. They also asked that the K-Mart see that the street is fenced off before construction, and a 5 ft- green belt established so that trucks would not use the street. The Mayor read the Planning Commission minutes pertaining to the hearing. The Attorney representing the K-Mart stated to council that a letter would be given from K-Mart to the property owners on 741� P1. W., guaranteeing them the stipulations as above requested. No one else wished to speak, and the hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Harrison that proposed Ordinance -11 1 be passed, amending the comprehensive plan to designate as commercial Lots 5 and 69 Block 1, and Lots 5 and 61 Block 2, Oliver Park Addition, according to Planning Commission Resolution #162. Motion carried unani- mously. A motion was then made by Councilman Harrison, seconded by Councilman Slye that pro- posed Ordinance #1192 be passed, to rezone from RS-8 to BC Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, and Lots 5 and 69 Block 29 Oliver Park Addition according to Resolution #161 of the Planning Commission. • Motion carried unanimously. 282 HEARING - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #163 - AMENDMENT TO COMPREH. STREET PLAN Hearing was opened on Planning Commission Resolution #163, recommending amendment to the comprehensive street plan for rerouting of 10a N. This is to allow the building of a new school. There was no one in the audience who wished to speak on the matter. Hearing was then closed, and a motion was made by Councilman McGinness, seconded by Councilman Slye that �T Ordinance #1193 be passed, amending the comprehensive street plan to reroute 10t' N. Motion carried unanimously. HEARING SET ON PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #164 Planning Commission Resolution #1649 File R-4-65, was presented by the Attorney to Council, for hearing on their recommendation to rezone from RS-20 to RS-12 the west h of Tract 86, plat of Meadowdale Beach. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye that the Hearing on Planning Commission Resolution #164 be set for April 19th. Motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR PAVING 9a AVENUE SOUTH Action on the proposed ordinance for paving 99 Ave. S. had been deferred from the meeting of February 15. A motion was made by Councilman McGinness, seconded by Councilman Tuson that in view of the overwhelming protest, the council abandon any further action on plans for an LID for paving of 9� Avenue S. Motion carried. AUDITING OF LID BILLS A motion was made by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that the following LID bills be authorized for payment: LID #126 - $96.65 to Norm's Print Shop and $40:64 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #129 - $52.15 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #131 - $54.65 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #133 - $84.74 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #135 - $61.79 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #136 - $26.00 to Washington Title Insurance Co. and $51.77 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #137 - $53.66 to Edmonds Tribune Review and $-30 to Reid, Middleton & �. Associated, Inc.; LID #138 - $65.42 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #139 - $111.53 to Edmonds Tribune Review and $52.10 to Pioneer National Title Insurance Co.; LID #140 - $40.53 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #141 - $53.60 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #144 - $44.75 to Edmonds Tribune Review; LID #145 - $18.20 to Edmonds Tribune Review; and LID #11+6 - $18.24 to Edmonds Tribune Review. Motion carried. CORRESPONDENCE A letter signed by several property owners was read, asking to be served by Edmonds water rather, than by the Fruitdale on the Sound water. The letter was accompanied by a copy of a letter from the Sanitation division of the County Health Dept. stating that the old wooden mains being used by Fruitdale on the Sound were cracking and plant matter and sediment were getting into the.lines, ,although the chlorination of the water supply seemed to be extensive, and no harmful bacteria had been found in samples of the water. They however recommended discontinuance of this sybtem. It was therefore stated that Wednesday, April 27 at 8:00 P.M. would be set for an informal hearing and everyone involved is invited to come in and discuss this water supply problem. A letter was received calling to the attention of the council the need for sewering of the area in the vicinity of 9tlh on Spruce because of a health hazard and odor from saturation of the ground from septic tanks. It was moved by Councilman Slye, seconded by Councilman Tuson that the Attorney be instructed to draw a Resolution of Intention for sewering of this area. Motion carried. Mayor Maxwell reported he had received an answer from Governor Evans in regard to the state resurfacing from 99 Ave. N. along 196M to the city limits, and for 238th S-W- to 5t Ave. S., and that a call for bids has gone out for this work. Also that the freeway access has been proposed in the 67-69 biennium budget. A letter from the State also was received wherein the Highway Commission approved the traffic ordinance of the City of Edmonds for a trucklane on 51h. The State advised that they would post an advisory speed of 20 m.p.h. on the corners of 9k and Puget Drive, 91� and Casper, and 3rd and Casper, in answer to letters they received from residents of Edmonds. A petition with approximately 100 signatures was received in favor of a dog leash law, and council stood on its previous action taken to place the question on an advisory ballot at the next city election. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION A woman from 681t Avenue W. complained about the dust problem. This street is in the city with county property to the east, and the residents had oiled it last summer, only to have the city grade the street in the fall when chuckholes appeared. This problem was to be looked into by the Public Works Dept. PROPOSED CONDEMNATION OF STRICKLAND WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES The proposed condemnation ordinance for the Strickland waterfront property had been tabled from the meeting of March 1. It was moved by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Harrison that the proposed ordinance be removed from the table. Motion carried. discussion followed. Attorney John Erlichman, representing Seattle First National Bank and the Stricklands asked that the City not enact this ordinance. He questioned the access to a proposed public park, as well as the effect on the neighborhoo& with people trespassing on lawns, etc. Mr. Erlichman then asked if the city was prepared to police the Strickland's private property if a park goes in there. He said it was better to purchase the entire site rather than take.a portion of their land which was cherished by the family as a home. Mr: Tom Wright, 700 Mel6dy Lane, felt that the park should be put in there. He thought it would be an addition to the neighborhood, rather than a detriment. Miss Hunter, whose property adjoins the Strickland's, stated that he deed says that her property 283g • cannot be put to public use. Another gentleman on Melody Lane objected to the proposed park site on grounds of access. Discussion of council followed, and before the motion from the March 1 meeting to pass the proposed ordinance could be voted upon, another motion was made by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Bevan to table the matter of the proposed con- demnation of this property until the council meeting of May 3 in order to study the situation further. A roll call vote showed all councilmen in favor except Slye, and the motion carried. REPORT ON PROPOSED VACATION OF PORTION OF OLIVER LANE Attorney Murphy reported on the proposed vacation of a portion of Oliver Lane. He stated the necessary dedication of land had been received, and it was therefore moved by Councilman- McGinness, seconded by Councilman Harrison that proposed Resolution #130 be passed, setting Tuesday, May 3 as the date for a hearing on the petition for vacation of a portion of Oliver Lane. Motion carried. REPORT ON BIDS FOR LID #137 Bids had been opened on LID #137, paving of Pine from Sk to 914, on March 29 at 2:00 P.M. in the Mayor's office with the Mayor, City Clerk, City Supervisor, City Engineer, and represen- tatives from bidding companies present. The bids were: Associated Sand & Gravel $ 9,848.75 Duwamish Associates, Inc. lo,4o6.00 Washington Asphalt Co. 99452.50 It was recommended that the low bid be accepted, and a motion was made by Councilman McGinness, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that Washington Asphalt Co. be awarded the bid on construction of LID #137, and the Mayor be authorized to enter into contract with them. Motion carried. REPORT ON BIDS FOR LID #141 • Bids had been opened on LID #141, paving of 814 from Dayton to Maple, on March 29 at 2:00 P.M. in the office of the Mayor. Those present at bid opening were the same as for LID #137. Bids for LID #141 were:. Washington Asphalt Co. s 49880.00 Duwamish Associates, Inc. 59345.50 Associated Sand & Gravel 59060.00 The recommendation was to accept the low bidder, and it was moved by Councilman Kincaid, seconded by Councilman Slye that Washington Asphalt Co. be awarded the contract for LID #141 in the amount of $49880.00 and the Mayor be authorized to enter into contract with them for the work. Motion carried. REPORT ON CATV Mayor Maxwell reported that according to the contract with Televue of Edmonds, they had exceeded their time limit in which to start construction. He also reported that a telegram from Mr. Wally Nelskog stated that the company was hegotiating with the Telephone Co. and requested an extension of 60 days on the contract with the City. This was taken under advisement. REPORT ON STREET LIGHT PROPOSAL An estimate from the PUD for street lights on the Meadowdale Beach Road, as well as upgrading of lights in several locations in the city with replacement of incandescent with that of mercury vapor lights was read, which would amount to approximately $600.00 annual increase in cost to the city. It was moved by Councilman Bevan, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that the lights as outlined in the correspondence from the PUD be ordered installed. ,Motion carried. REPORT ON PROPOSAL TO FORM LID FOR PAVING 59 S.E. EASTERLY TO CITY LIMITS • The proposed paving of 59 S.E. from the existing improvement easterly.to the city limits was discussed, but since sewers are not installed in this area, it was decided to hold the matter for committee meeting. AUTHORIZATION FOR JOINT USE PAYMENT TO MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR SEWER MAINS With the recent annexation of the Carlisle property, 5 acres in the Lake Ballinger area, it was .necessary under the joint agreement with Mountlake Terrace to reimburse them for the sewer facilities. It was therefore moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye that the amount of $1190.00 be authorized for payment to Mountlake Terrace as computed under the terms of the agreement for joint use of sewer facilities. Motion carried. REPORT ON PROPOSED LID FOR PAVING OF 10:q S.E. AND VICINITY It was recommended by the Engineer to proceed with an LID for paving of Ice S.E. from 259 S., westerly to 21st S.; 22nd S., southerly from 104 S:E.; and 23rd S., southerly from 10th S.E., as received by petition. There were several property owners present who would be involved in this proposed LID. Mr. E. C. Remus, 22nd S., objected to the possibility of being as-sessed for paving when 22nd S. is already paved. Mr. Christiansen, who lives on the corner of 101h S.E. and 23rd S., replied that Mr. Remus would in fact be using the paved streets under the LID more than he would, as Mr. Remus would have to drive over them both coming and going from 22nd, which is a cul-de-sac. There were several people in favor of the proposed improvement and several against. All mentioned the speeding, especially to and from the high school by students, and also stated that the dust is bad. It was moved by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that the Attorney be instructed to draw a Resolution of Intention for improvement of the above mentioned streets by paving. Mr. Remus then objected from the audience, and said that he still felt 22nd S. should be deleted from the proposed LID. A motion was then made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye to amend the first motion to delete 22nd S., and a roll call vote showed Councilmen Harrison, Tuson, Slye and Bevan voting in favor; Olds, • McGinness and Kincaid against, and the motion carried 4 to 3. It was then moved by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Kincaid that the Attorney be instructed to draw a Resolution of Intention for the improvement of the streets in the petition# with the exclusion of 22nd S. Motion carried with Councilman Olds voting against. REPORT ON PROPOSED SEWERING OF UNIT # 4 A petition with approximately 150 signatures had been received for sewering of a portion of Unit # 4, and the Engineer reported that it was his recommendation that all of Unit # 4 be severed at once. It was therefore moved by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Tuson that the Attorney prepare a Resolution of Intention for the sewering of Unit # 4. Motion carried. PROPOSED REVENUE BONDS FOR WATER- SEWER DEPT. The Attorney presented to council a proposed ordinance providing for the issuance and sale - of $190009000.00 of water and sewer revenue bonds for adopting a system or plan of additions to and betterments and extensions of the waterworks system of the City of Edmonds. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye that proposed Ordinance #1194 be passed, and -the -motion carried unanimously. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TRAFFIC ORDINANCE A proposed amendment to the traffic ordinance was presented to council for its first reading. PROPOSED ORDINANCE CORRECTING ORDINANCE #1174 A proposed ordinance correcting the legal description in Ordinance #1174 was presented, and a motion was made by Councilman Harrison, seconded by Councilman Slye that proposed Ordinance #1195 be passed, and the motion carried unanimously. There was no further business, and the meeting was adjourned. U / City Clerk April 199 1966 ROLL CALL Regular meeting was called to order by Mayor Maxwell with all councilmen present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the meeting of April 5 had been posted and mailed, and it was noted that under the report on proposed LID for paving of 1014 S.E. and vicinity, the wording of the next to the last sentence had been changed to read as follows: "The original motion as amended was then voted upon, for the Attorney to be instructed to draw a Resolution of Intention for the improvement of the streets in the petition with the exclusion of 22nd S. Motion carried with Councilman Olds voting against." The minutes were then approved. AMENDED AMOUNT FOR JOINT -USE PAYMENT TO MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR SEWER MAINS The amount of $1190.00 authorized for payment to Mountlake Terrace to reimburse them for sewer facilities because of the recent annexation of 5 acres by Edmonds, was found to be an incorrect calculation, and it was therefore moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Slye that the amount of $1573.60, rather than the $1190.00, be paid to Mountlake Terrace under the joint sewer agreement. Motion carried. HEARING - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION #164 Hearing was opened on Planning Commission Resolution #1649 recommending a rezone from RS-20 to RS-'12 of the west,yi of Tract 869 Plat of Meadowdale Beach. The minutes of the Planning Commission hearing were read by Mayor Maxwell. There was no one in the audience who wished to be heard in regard to the proposed rezone, and the hearing was closed. A motion was made by Councilman Olds, seconded by Councilman Slye that proposed Ordinance #1199 be passed, amending the zoning map and rezoning from RS-20 to RS-12 the west h of Tract 869 Plat of Meadowdale Beach. Motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - SEWERING VICINITY OF 99 AND SPRUCE Letters had been received requesting sewering for the area in the vicinity of 9k and Spruce because of a health hazard from ground saturated with septic tank effluent. It was recommended by the Engineer that this area be sewered as soon as possible, and no one in the audience wished to comment. It was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman .Slye that Resolution of Intention #197 be passed, for sewers in the vicinity of. 91h and Spruce, and the hearing on the preliminary assessment roll be set for June 7. Motion carried. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION - PAVING 1014 S.E. AND VICINITY The Attorney had been instructed to draw a Resolution of Intention for paving of 10k S.E. and 23rd S., but deleting 22nd S. from the project, although the petition for the LID had included it. Mr. McBurney, a property owner on 23rd, was present and wished 2-3rd to also be deleted. Councilman Olds stated that he felt both 22nd and 23rd should be kept in the proposed LID, and Mr. Christiansen, a property owner on 22nd, agreed. They felt there could be problems if the whole project were not put in at one time. A gentleman living on 23rd spoke in objection to both paving and sidewalks in this area. Councilman Harrison asked if 23rd could possibly be paved with no sidewalks included. There way much discussion of the matter, and it was then 1 1 • • 1 1