19720404 City Council Minutes250. ,
#10 on the agenda, also be continued to May 2. Motion carried.'
REPORT ON BIDS FOR SURPLUS ACCOUNTING MACHINES
CAO Ron Whaley reported to council that no bids had been received on the sur-
plus accounting machines.
OCCUPANCY PERMIT POLICY
Building Official Harry Whitcutt reported that he had discussed this policy,
with the City Attorney, who indicated that if this inv6ilv6dc�ati'-.amendmeht -:to
the zoning ordinance, it would have*to go to the Planning Commission for a
hearing before council took action. Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by
Councilman Nordquist'to-refer the occupancy permit policy to the Planning
Commission, and the motion carried.
AUDITING OF BILLS
A motion was made by Councilman Haines, seconded by Councilman Nordquist that
vouchers #14601 through #14783 in-thetotal amount of $93,652.71 be approved,
and authorize warrants to be issued in apyment of these regular monthly bills.
Motion carried.
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES
A claim for damages was received from Larry Wold, and this was referred to the
City Clerk for processing
FINAL PLAT - ANDERSON PARK
City Planner Merlin Logan presented the final plat of Anderson Park for council
approval, and upon his recommendation, a motion was made by Councilman Nelson,
seconded by Councilman Tuson that council approve the final plat of Anderson
Park. Motion carried.
COUNCIL PARTICIPATION
1
1
n
U
Councilman Tuson tendered his resignation from the Labor Negotiation Committee,
for the reason that he could not be present at all the meetings.
LICENSE APPLICATION FOR SHANNON TOWING
Police Chief Foster reported that an application had been received from
Shannon Towing, operating at 7608 - 202nd SW with a conditional use permit
for one tow truck. However, the Board of Adjustment had allowed one truck,
and Mr. Shannon now had three at this address. Since this would be setting
a serious precedent, inasmuch as there was at present a violation of the
conditional use permit, a motion was made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by
Councilman Nordquist to deny the application of Shannon Towing for a Tow
Truck license. Motion carried:
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CAO TO ADMINISTER FUNCTIONS OF COUNCIL'COMMITTEES
With the abolishment of -the Council Committee system, it was necessary to
delegate the authority to the CAO to administer the functions of these several
committees. Therefore, it was moved by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Council-
man Nelson that proposed Ordinance #1599 be passed, and the motion carried. •
There was no further business to come before council, and the meeting was
adjourned at 11:40 P.M.
Irene Varney MoraV City Clerk Harve,_H.•Harrison, Mayor
April 4, 1972
ROLL CALL
The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order by Mayor
Harve Harrison with all council members present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was noted by Councilman,Gellert that under the item on Shannon Towing in
the minutes' of March 21, the motion to deny the application for a tow truck
license in Edmonds was not made because of any alleged violation of the con-
ditional use permit, as the wording sounded. There were no further omissions
nor corrections, and the minutes were then approved.
HEARING: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 357
Hearing had been continued from the meeting of February 15 on Planning Com-
mission Resolution 357, recommending an amendment to the Comprehensive
•
251.
•
1
1
•
Thoroughfare Plan to establish a Recreation Street System, as set forth in
Planning Commission File CP-1-71.
City Planner Merlin Logan posted'several maps outlining suggested trail
systems, and gave a.brief explanation of each. He then stated that in order
to provide a solution for the recreational trail proposal, he recommended that
the council take three actions: (1) adopt by resolution the Planning Commis-
sion bicycle trail system as modified by the Park Board recommendation on one"
trail, which would provide the skeleton form of an official trail system which
would make the city elegible for possible state and federal funds; (2.) adopt
the Park Board proposal for the one bicycle.: -pedestrian trail and proceed with
plans to finance and construct this trail so that completion will be achieved
within a five year period; (3) refer the other three trail proposals which
were adopted by the -Planning Commission on scenic streets, bridle trails and
pedestrian trails back to the'Park Board for further consideration.
Hearing was then opened. Jane Cunningham, 1030 Grandview, asked if both these
plans connected to those of Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood, and are these plans
the original.ones as suggested by the Bicycle Club? Mr. Logan answered that
the recommendations from the Club were on the east -west route to Mountlake
Terrace. Mrs. Cunningham said she would like to go on record as supporting
the Planning Commission recommendation as set forth in their Resolution 357.
Rod Garretson, Director of Parks & Recreation, stated that it was the
intention of the Park Board to expand in the future along these lines, but
that this plan would be a beginning. No one else in the audience wished to
comment', and the hearing was closed." Further council discussion followed, and
it was then moved by Councilman Haines, seconded by Councilman Tuson to in-
struct the Attorney to prepare a resolution to approve the proposed bicycle
and pedestrian path as illustrated on the Park Board map, and as streets are
improved, include definite provisions for implementation of the trail plan;
but none to be assigned for use until approved by the proper officials in
regard to the safety aspect. Councilwoman Shippen spoke in favor of adopting.
all the plans with modifications, if necessary, since chances for obtaining
funding would be much better with a complete and thorough plan, and adoption
of a single trail with anticipation for future trails was not a well designed
procedure for this reason. Vote was then taken on the motion to instruct the
Attorney to prepare a resolution for the bicycle and pedestrian trails as
illustrated, and this carried.
Councilwoman Shippen then moved, seconded by Councilman Nelson to adopt the
Planning Commission plan on the second map shown, in conjunction with the
first map, which represented the Bicycle Club's desires, being a more compre-
hensive plan which connects with the other trails and is more complete. This
motion also carried.
It was then moved by Councilwoman Shippen, seconded by Councilman Nelson for
adoption also of the recreational walks system. Discussion followed, and this
motion carried.
Councilwoman Shippen remarked that perhaps the UAB could lower the 36' minimum
width on the scenic streets, and they would thus be protected from construction
programs that would widen them and destroy their scenic usefulness. She then
made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gellert that 196th or SR 504, from 84th
to Main, and Olympic View Drive from Puget Drive to Perrinville be adopted
and designated as scenic streets as part of the Scenic Street plan. A roll
call vote showed Council members Gellert, Shippen and Nelson voting.in favor,
isthe four remaining councilmen against, and this motion failed to carry.
Councilwoman Shippen then moved, seconded by Councilman Gellert that the
Bridle Trail System plan be referred to the Park & Recreation Advisory Board
for reconsideration and with the request that a new report on the plan be
received by council within 4 months. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Councilman Gellert, seconded by Councilman Nelson that
the Scenic Streets plan be referred back to the Planning Commission for a
definition of exactly just what they mean by a scenic street, and for further
study and a recommendation to council regarding scenic streets. Motion
carried.
At this point, Mr. Dewey Leyda suggested that council take up item #7 on the
agenda for the -senior citizens' housing, since many senior citizens were
present in the audience.
SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSI14G
The Edmonds City Council had passed Resolution #243 on August 17, 1971 de-
claring a,need for low rent housing and notifying the'Snohomish County Housing
Authority of the intention of Edmonds to contract with this agency for leasing
privately owned housing under Section 23 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1965.
However, since the City had specified a program with particular reference to
approving areas and giving preference to the retired and elderly, HUD felt
this was restrictive and could be a potential'for discrimination that violates
the basic concept of the low -rent program. The City of Edmonds was therefore
requested to reconsider its position and resubmit a standard resolution, with-
out conditions, before a program could be implemented. The City Attorney had
prepared a new resolution without restrictions. Mayor Harrison read a letter
• from L.K. Pennington, member of the study group, in which he stated that he
2 52
•
was somewhat reluctant to.recommend construction of a project devoted to
elderly housing while apartment units which will pass the criteria for such
use are standing vacant. He added that he was not opposed to a turn -key
project in.the future when the economic situation improves. He felt that the
factors involved in a turn -key project would be advantageous for the elderly,
and would outweigh using presently available apartments, but the apartment
house owners who have been given permits to build units in Edmonds, and do
contribute to the local economy, should be given first consideration.
Mrs. Goodwin, Snohomish County Housing Authority, explained the Section 23
leased housing, and noted that Edmonds had been turned down because of the
reasons heretofore stated. She agreed you cannot deprive owners from using
existing units, and added that you cannot use turn -key money for leased
housing, nor vice versa. -She suggested that Edmonds consider both programs.
She stated that requests are taken and placed on a priority list, and that 30
out of the 75 units in Snohomish County are for.senior citizens. Mrs. Goodwin
went on to explain the differences between leased housing and the turn -key
projects, and answered several council and audience questions in regard to
these programs.
Following a great deal of discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Haines,
seconded'by Councilman Nordquist that proposed Resolution 258 be passed, de-
claring a need for low -rent housing under the provisions of Section 23 of the-
U.S. Housing Act, and notifying the Snohomish County Hot'sing'-Authority of
the intention of the City of Edmonds -to contract with said agency for a pro-
gram of leasing privately owned housing under Section 23. This motion carried.
Discussion was then held on adoption of a cooperation agreement with the
Housing Authority for 180 units of low rent housing under the Turn -key pro-
gram. The local government would, within five yeats, eliminate existing
undesirable and substandard units in exchange for new low rent units to be
built. The City would probably have to waive certain building codes or zoning
restrictions'within reasonable limits to allow for,construction. Mayor
Harrison had asked the Edmonds Fire Dept. to furnish him with a list of units
in the City which would be classified as being candidates for condemnation or
to be replaced, and they came up with 18 vacant, and about 85 occupied. The
Mayor noted that an agreement of this sort could be acted upon by council
only after a five day notice had been published. Since this had not been
done, no action could be taken tonight on an agreement. Mr. Fremont Case,
in the audience, gave an example of low income housing being built for senior
citizens east of'the freeway. Another gentleman in the audience stated that
the most important question.was'how long would it take for both types of
housing programs to begin. Mrs. Goodwin answered that applications were
ready to go in for the funds as soon as the city submits its agreement.
There was some further discussion, and council then invited Mrs: Goodwin to
attend'the next work meeting on Tuesday, April 11 for the purpose of clarify-
ing questions they have on the programs. It was then moved by Councilman
Gellert, seconded by Councilwoman Shippen to set April 18 as the hearing date
for a proposed agreement on senior citizen housing, and the motion carried.
Mayor Harrison then declared a 10 minute recess.
HEARING: ON APPEAL FROM PLANNING'COMMISSION DENIAL OF SUBDIVISION
Hearing was held on an appeal from Mrs: Ethyl Evans from the Planning Commis-
sion denial of a subdivision of three lots on_12th Avenue North in an RS-12
zone, in accordance with File 5-5-72.
City Planner Merlin Logan briefly explained the situation and pointed out the
area of the proposed subdivision on the map. The area was formerly known as
the Major Hinch property, and one house is already situated on one lot. Mr.
Logan read the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting wherein they recom-
mended denial, but he stated that he'recommended allowing the subdivison
inasmuch as the boundary lines on one lot had been set by court order, and
the entire square footage of the area was 36,000 square feet. Hearing was
opened.
Dwight Hume, Site Planner for Meyring & Associates, Inc., speaking in behalf
of Mrs. Ethyl Evans,'requested an appeal from the Planning Commission -decision.
He explained the situation on Lots A. B,and C,'stating that the entire pro-
perty was over 36,000 square feet, and he felt the Planning Commission had
denied this subdivision because an attorney who happened to be in the audience
that evening had objected to what he called substandard lots, but Mr. Hume
said they would have gone to the Board of Adjustment for the required variances.
No one else in the audience wished to comment, and'the hearing was closed.
Discussion followed, wherein it'was allowed that the lot sizes were small in
comparison with the area zoning requirements, and'it was,then moved by
Councilman Gellert,seconded by Councilwoman Shippers to uphold the Planning
Commission's denial of this subdivision. A roll call vote was taken, and the
motion carried with Councilmen Nordquist and Winters voting against.
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MEADOWSHIRE
1
•
n
•
1
1
City Planner Merlin Logan presented the preliminary plat of Meadowshire, a
25 t
n
LJ
six lot plat on 4th South. After studying the plat map, a motion was made by
Councilman Haines, seconded by.Councilman Nelson to approve the preliminary
plat of Meadowshire, subject .to engineering requirements.and a mutual main-
tenance contract for the easement road servicing the lots. -Motion carried.
FINAL PLAT - SHARON HEIGHTS #2.
The City Planner presented the final plat of Sharon Heights #2, with a map and
brief explanation of the area. It was moved by Councilman Nelson, seconded by
Councilman Nordquist that council approve the final plat of Sharon Heights 42,
and the motion carried.
SWIMMING POOL BOND ORDINANCE.-
City Attorney James A. Murphy reported that
because of the
contingency amount
of $.15,000, and being unable at this time to
exactly.designate
the amount
needed, he advised waiting until the final
costs become known
before selling
bonds; that the city instead use available
funds on a loan
basis; and that
the bond ordinance can then be prepared at
a'later date.
REPORT ON BIDS FOR PAVING 100th AND FIRDALE
FROM WESTGATE TO 244th
Bids had been opened at 2:00 P.M. on April
3 in the Council
Chambers for the
paving of 100th and Firdale Avenue from Westgate
to 244th.
Present at bid
opening were the CAO, City Engineer, City Clerk,
Forrest Roff
from Reid,
Middleton & Associates, Inc., several representatives
from
bidding companies,
and a member of the Press. There were 8 bids:
•
SCHEDULE I
SCHEDULE II
Knowles Construction Co.
$4149331.90
$ 439600.00
Universal Utility Contractors
419,495.00
469560.00
Bay Construction, Inc.
4539532.80
45,820.00
West Coast Construction
467,025.25
55,496.50
Shaffer Construction & Engineering
471,563.40
519885.00
Bellevue Bulldozing
4809072.00
467230:00
Coulee Construction
4809268.81
56,581.96
Tri-State-Construction
526,738.70
46'1757.50
Discussion was held on previous projects done be Knowles, namely•76th,and council
cautioned that strict inspection be given to this project if awarded.tq this
company. City Engineer Leif Larson recommended award of the project to the
low bidder, subject to approval of the County Commissioners and the Urban
Arterial -Board, and subject to approval of Schedule II by the Olympic View
Water District. A motion was made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman
Haines to award the contract to the low bidder, Knowles Construction Company,
for $414,331.90 for Schedule I and $43,600.00 for Schedule II, subject to all
engineering requirements and approvals as noted. Motion carried with Council-
man Nordquist voting against.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 374
City Planner Logan briefed council on the particulars of Planning Commission
Resolution 374, recommending denial of a proposed amendment to the official
zoning ordinance to allow privately owned school bus shelters with off -
premise advertising at approved locations and waiving yard requirements, as
set forth in. -Planning Commission File ZO-1-72.
• It was moved by Councilman Gellert, seconded by Councilman Nordquist to
uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission in their Resolution 374
for denial of the proposed amendment as set forth in File ZO-1-72. Motion
carried.
SET HEARING DATE FOR PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 375
Planning Commission Resolution 375 was presented for setting a date for
hearing on the recommendation that certain properties recently annexed to the
City of Edmonds and zoned by'the County as RR-8400, rural residential 8400,
be rezoned to city RS-8. It was moved by Councilman Nordquist, seconded by
Councilman Gellert to set the hearing date for Planning Commission Resolution
375 for May 2, and the motion carried.
CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Harrison read a letter from Donald R. Morken, Executive Vice -President
of Seattle -Northwest Securities Corporation, regarding advance refunding of
the 11,000,000 1970 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond issue. Don Morken and Dick
Kennedy from Seattle -Northwest Securities were present, and Mr. Morken stated
that based on today's bond market, an advance refunding plan would effectively
reduce the interest on this debt by more than 1°%, and in terms of dollar
saving could amount to a total saving of $95,000. Mr. Morken urged council
to act on the proposal as soon as possible, since timing is extremely critical
in successfully accomplishing this type of refinancing. There was much dis-
cussion, and following recommendation of the Mayor, a motion was made by
Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman Nordquist that the City of Edmonds
retain the firm of Seattle -Northwest Securities Corporation and authorize the
city administration to consummate the move for refunding at the proper time.
• Motion carried.
2'5 4
•
LETTER OF INTENT TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS - "CHERRY HILL"
A letter of intent signed by approximately 33 properties and totaling 10% of
the assessed valuation of the area asking for annexation was presented to coun-
cil. Chief Administrative Officer Ron Whaley explained the progress, including
meetings, which had brought this area in the "Cherry Hill" section to this
point of presenting their intent to commence annexation proceedings to the City
of Edmonds.
A woman in the audience stated she and many others had attended the Lynnwood
city council meeting and had been told that in order to have sewers if they
annexed to Edmonds, Edmonds would have to negotiate with Lynnwood for these
sewers. City Engineer Leif Larson answered that Edmonds has an interest in
the sewer line in this area, but would have to negotiage with Lynnwood for use
of the trunk. However,, he and the City Attorney had reviewed the contract the
city has with Lynnwood and determined that Edmonds has the right to use the
sewer line as long as this did not exceed a certain capacity.
Gaylord Riach, Lynnwood City Attorney, who is also a resident of the "Cherry
Hill" area, stated that he personally preferred to remain in the county. He
added that the City of Lynnwood would require separate negotiations for ser-
vicing this area with sewers, and he felt the area in question was not really
serviceable by Edmonds, so he suggested tabling the petition request until the
matter can be looked into further. A gentleman in the audience remarked that
the main concern of this section asking for annexation was for sewers. It was
decided that Edmonds City Attorney Murphy would review the Edmonds -Lynnwood
sewer contract with the City Engineer and with Reid, Middleton & Associates,
who are engineers for both Edmonds and Lynnwood. In the meantime, Attorney
Murphy suggested council could take action on the letter of intent.
•
Discussion.was held on both LID and ULID methods of financing, and City Engineer
Larson explained the zone and termini method of assessing property. He also
answered questiore on costs pertaining to installation of sewers, stating that
it could range anywhere from $6.00 to $23.00 a zone front foot, depending on
circumstances.
Lynnwood City Attorney Riach,suggested that Edmonds, Lynnwood and all the
people concerned in this Cherry Hill area meet together to try to resolve the
problems of sewers, annexation, etc. There were questions from the audience
on the various methods of financing sewers, fire protection for the area, etc.
Council assured the residents that definite answers. could be given them on the
date which would be set for hearing, and it was moved by Councilman Nelson,
seconded by'Councilman Haines that the date for hearing on the letter of intent '
for annexation be set for April 18. Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF LICENSE - PLAZA CAB
Police Captain Neuert reported on the request for transfer of license of Plaza
Cab from Eugene Pearson, who had sold the business, to Verle A. Hawkins, em-
ployed by Farwest Cab Co. Mr. Hawkins had satisfied all requirements=for
character, responsibility, and insurance. It was moved by Councilman Haines,
seconded by Councilman Nordquist to approve the transfer of Plaza Cab to Mr.
Verle A. Hawkins, and the motion carried.
COUNCIL PARTICIPATION
Councilman Nordquist asked the City -Engineer a question concerning Item #1 on •
the April 18 agenda - the necessity for an assessment roll hearing on the 228th
project. It was answered that these people on the assessment roll inside city
limits of Edmonds must have their hearing, even though the project will be bid
and awarded by the City of Mountlake Terrace.
Councilman Haines brought again to council attention the suggestion made by
Mr. Leyda earlier in the meeting that smoking by the council during the
meetings was offensive. Councilman Haines said that he, for one, would abide
by a rule not to smoke during meetings, and suggested that no smoking be
allowed in the council chambers;.that a "NO SMoking" sign be posted, and the
ashtrays removed.
Councilman Nelson pointed out the emergency dispatch at SNOCOM which is now in
operation and said the dispatch center would like the Edmonds city council
members to take a tour of the facility. It was decided that at 7:00 P.M.,
prior to the Tuesday, April 11 work meeting, would be the time set for those
who wished to take this tour.
CAO REPORT
CAO Ron Whaley reported that due to the new SNOCOM operation, the back door to
the Edmonds Civic Center would hereafter be locked at 5:00 P.M., and council
members needing a key should check with him.
UNION CONTRACTS
CAO Whaley also reported that negotiations with the Unions had ended, and
contracts were soon ready to be signed. He stated that these were no 2 year
contracts,'and he gave a brief rundown on some of the points to be included.
A motion was then made by Councilman Haines, seconded by Councilman Winters:.to •
•
1
1
•
1
authorize the Mayor to sign the three Union contracts when ready. Motion
carried.
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES
A claim for damages was acknowledged from Miss Diane Rush, 'and this was re-
ferred to the City.Clerk for processing.
EQUIPMENT.RENTAL RATES FOR 1972
Equipment rental rates had been presented for 1972,.and a motion was made by.
Councilman Gellert, seconded by Councilman Nelson to approve the 1972 equip-
ment rental rates. Motion carried.
There was no further business, and the meeting was adjourned at 12:25 P.M.
jte� Z_4,2�� �_
Irene Varney Moran City Clerk
April 18, 1972
RnT.T. raT.r.
I •
Harve' H. Harrison, Mayor
Regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order by Mayor Harve
Harrison with all councilmen present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the meeting of April 4 had been posted and mailed, and with no
omissions nor corrections, they were approved as written.
SENIOR CITIZEN TURNKEY PROJECT
Mayor Harrison reported that'he had written to our congressional delegates
pointing out the opinion that there -should be some shift in funding in order
to take advantage of the vacant units in this area. The City Attorney had
written to Harold Hopkins, Washington Housing Service, asking for clarification
on questions regarding the Cooperation Agreement. No answeres had been received
up to this time, and the Mayor suggested postponing any action on this agenda
item until answers are received on the Cooperation Agreement and also after
Council has had a chance to meet with Diane Goodwin, who was ill and could not
attend the last council work meeting. The Mayor also mentioned Ward Phillips,
whom he thought might attend the next work meeting to help with any questions
council might have.
Mr. Brown from Washington Housing Authority was present in the audience and
offered to answer questions, and he too was invited to be present at the next
Tuesday council work meeting.
In response to a suggestion from Councilman Nelson, Mayor Harrison read the
letter from the City Attorney to Mr. Hopkins, containing the questions raised
by the proposed agreement, for benefit of those people in the audience inter-
ested in this matter.
• Following this, a motion was made by Councilman Tuson, seconded by Councilman
Nordquist to postpone this hearing on the Turnkey project to May 2. Council-
woman Shippen inquired if the entire matter on housing would be taken up, or
only the discussion on Turnkey and the agreement. City Attorney Murphy stated
that council could not take any action at the next meeting other than to set
the hearing on the proposed agreement, since statutes required a five day
notice prior to any action on the proposed cooperation agreement. The vote on
the motion then carried.
HEARING: ON LETTER OF INTENT TO ANNEX CHERRY HILL AREA
Hearing was held on the letter of intent to annex the area in north Edmonds
known as "Cherry Hill". Mayor Harrison reported on the letter he had re-
ceived from the City Attorney concerning the City of Edmonds' right to hook
onto the sanitary sewer line in this particular area. He stated that the City
of Edmonds does have the right to tie into the line, according to his inter-
pretation of the Edmonds -Lynnwood Agreement.
In regard to the proposed annexation of this area to Edmonds, the property
owners involved were given to understand that the City of Edmonds would re-
quire the assumption of the city's indebtedness; that council would entertain
a petition for annexation with signatures representing 75% of the assessed
valuation; and that the city was interested in considering the revenue bond
method for financing their sewers..
City Engineer Leif Larson gave an estimate on cost for installing sewers and
for connection charges, with monthly sewer service rates based on varying
connection charge amounts. Mayor Harrison read a proposed resolution calling
for an election for annexation in conjunction with the September 19 Primary.
The County Auditor's estimate for cost of an election, whether special or in
•