2010.06.15 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
Edmonds City Council
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
______________________________________________________________
JUNE 15, 2010
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. Roll Call
B. AM-3136 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2010.
C. AM-3139 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 8, 2010.
D. AM-3147 Approval of claim checks #119247 through #119354 dated June 3, 2010 for $253,494.45,
and #119355 through #119518 dated June 10, 2010 for $836,348.05. Approval of payroll
direct deposit and checks #49359 through #49360 for the period May 16 through May 31,
2010 for $644,533.27.
E. AM-3135 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Abbie White, Willow Crest
Condominium Association ($80.00).
F. AM-3137 Acceptance of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the
Washington State Liquor Control Board, May 2010.
G. AM-3104 Authorization to contract with "Pull-a-Part" Company and surplus Unit # 234, a City police
vehicle, totaled in an accident.
H. AM-3138 Authorization for Mayor to sign Addendum No. 3 to the professional services agreement with
Perteet, Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access project.
I. AM-3149 Revision to City's Water Leakage Policy.
J. AM-3140 Proposed interlocal agreement with Lynnwood for video court hearings.
K. AM-3115 Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the provisions of Chapter 10.16,
Cemetery Board, Section 10.16.050 "Funds for Improvement and Maintenance of the
Cemetery" to clarify the use of funds contained therein, and fixing a time when the same shall
become effective.
3. AM-3121
(10 Minutes)
Presentation of National Wildlife Federation/Community Wildlife Habitat City Award.
4. AM-3142 Decision regarding the Mayor replacement procedure.
Packet Page 1 of 304
4. AM-3142
(20 Minutes)
Decision regarding the Mayor replacement procedure.
5. AM-3141
(20 Minutes)
Public hearing on the application for a renewal of a Concession Agreement. The
agreement is for the use of the public right-of-way to vend food and beverages. The site
is located at James Street immediately east of the ferry holding lanes and is adjacent to
the SR104 park. (Applicant: Kalani Kahaialii, Angelo Narciso, Cyndi Aiona Cook /
Shorts ‘N Slippas, LLC)
6. AM-3113
(30 Minutes)
Public hearing, followed by action, on a proposed Ordinance amending Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) Titles 19.25 and 19.65, adopting updated 2009
International Fire Code and City Marina Code.
7. AM-3148
(15 Minutes)
Continued discussion and potential action regarding the public hearing held on June 1,
2010 renewing interim Ordinance 3780, adopting certain procedures with respect to the
abandonment, construction and authorization of public projects and street vacations
and dedications.
8. AM-3150
(15 Minutes)
Discussion regarding the 2011 Budget.
9. AM-3130
(15 Minutes)
Continued narrative and potential action on the formation of a levy committee.
10.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings.
11. AM-3143
(15 Minutes)
Update on proposed sign code amendments to provide clarification of definition and
criteria for wall graphics/murals.
12. AM-3134
(15 Minutes)
Council-Manager form of government.
13. AM-3145
(15 Minutes)
Request for Comprehensive Plan submittal date exception.
14. AM-3146
(15 Minutes)
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of June 8, 2010.
15. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
16. (15 Minutes)Council Comments
ADJOURN
Packet Page 2 of 304
AM-3136 2.B.
Approve 06-01-10 City Council Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 1, 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 06-01-10 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 05:22 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/08/2010 05:35 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 01:00 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/08/2010 05:18
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/09/2010
Packet Page 3 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
June 1, 2010
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Strom Peterson, Council President Pro Tem
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Steve Bernheim, Council President
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Graham Marmion, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Leonard Yarberry, Building Official
Debi Humann, Human Resources Director
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
FRALEY-MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 25, 2010.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #119126 TO #119246 DATED MAY 27, 2010 FOR
$511,626.90.
D. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM VERIZON
(AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND ERIN GRAAFSTRA ($6,994.26).
3. COMMUNITY SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT - GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE / 4TH OF JULY EVENTS.
Ron Clyborne referred to a letter provided by the Chamber of Commerce regarding their request for
funding from the City for the 4th of July events. He explained the Chamber’s mission was to organize a
family oriented Independence Day in Edmonds to attract visitors and enhance the small town atmosphere.
Packet Page 4 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 2
The Greater Edmonds Chamber of Commerce has been organizing events since 1907 and recently formed
the Edmonds Chamber Foundation, a 501(c)(3), to allow the public to make tax deductable donations.
One of the most worthy events the Chamber organizes each year is the 4th of July parade and fireworks,
daylong festivities that build memories for thousands. He cited last year’s Children’s Parade that had over
2,000 participants and 8,000 spectators who watched the 2-hour main parade. He anticipated increased
participation and spectators this year due to Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace’s cancelling their 4th of
July celebrations. Musical entertainment and a fireworks display complete the daylong event.
Mr. Clyborne explained the cost of the entire event is substantial and in the past have been covered by
sponsorships and donations by the business community and the public. Despite the challenge of raising
the necessary funds every year, the Chamber believes this event is critical to the community feeling and
civic pride woven into the fabric of Edmonds. He urged the public to consider a donation to the Edmonds
Chamber Foundation to help sponsor the 4th of July events.
Mr. Clyborne provided the schedule of 4th of July events:
Fun Run 11:00 a.m.
Children’s Parade 12:30 p.m.
Main Parade 1:00 p.m.
Evening Entertainment 7:30 p.m.
Fireworks 10:00 p.m.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked where the public could make donations. Mr. Clyborne provided
the Chamber’s phone number, 425-670-1496, and the Chamber’s website: EdmondsWA.com.
Mayor Haakenson commented few people realize how much effort and money the Chamber puts into the
4th of July events. He expressed his thanks to Mr. Clyborne and the Chamber for hosting the events every
year. He relayed his conversations with Executive Director Jan Vance who indicated the Chamber was on
the verge of not having this event in the future. He urged the public to contribute if they wanted
Edmonds’ 4th of July events to continue.
Councilmember Buckshnis anticipated the ability for the public to make tax deductible donations to the
Chamber Foundation would encourage donations.
4. MIKE DOUBLEDAY - WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION RECAP.
Legislative Lobbyist Mike Doubleday referred to the Final 2010 State Legislative Report in the Council
packet. He provided the following highlights of the 2010 State Legislative Session:
$250,000 was provided in the supplemental transportation budget for the Shell Valley Emergency
Road Access project. He recognized Representatives Marko Liias and Judy Clibborn for their
assistance with that funding. He recommended the City spend those funds by the end of the
biennium, June 2011.
A local government fiscal flexibility bill was passed that will allow Edmonds to:
o Levy a 0.1% public safety sales tax increase with voter approval; 1/3 of the funds must be
used for criminal justice purposes,
o Eliminates the non-supplant language for the existing 0.1% criminal justice sales tax, and
o Permits the City to continue to collect the tax on brokered natural gas
The state revenue package through application of a sales tax on bottled water, candy and gum will
provide more funds to cities. Estimates are this source will generate $28 million to cities and
counties statewide. The tax on bottled water will sunset in three years; there is no sunset date on
the sales tax on candy and gum.
Packet Page 5 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 3
The supplemental capital budget contains approximately $50 million for one time funding for
cities’ stormwater mandates. The funds will be distributed via a lump sum as well as via an
application process to access approximately $24 million. He estimated the lump sum provided to
Edmonds at $180,000 which would be distributed late summer.
The Transportation Benefit District statute was amended to clearly state that city projects are an
allowable use of TBD funding.
Comprehensive Plan updates for cities were pushed back from 2011 to 2014.
The 911 system was upgraded to allow text messages to work with the system. This will be
funded via an increase in the state tax from $0.50 to $0.70 and the county tax from $0.20 to
$0.25.
Local campaign contributions must mirror the state’s limit of $800 per election (primary and
general).
He highlighted bills that were not passed this legislative session:
Limiting the use of automated traffic safety cameras. This bill would have required a 4 second
yellow light and the fine could only be $25.
The Airport Siting bill did not receive a hearing. This bill would have required a 7 mile zone
around an airport where development would be limited.
He highlighted the following interim issues:
Possible transportation revenue package in 2011. He invited the City to inform him of projects to
be included in that package.
Creation of a State transit funding work group to recommend additional transit funding
Future stormwater funding
Puget Sound Partnership funding
Airport siting
Automated traffic safety cameras
Lake Ballinger Forum
Mayor Haakenson thanked Mr. Doubleday for his efforts to include $250,000 in the supplemental
transportation budget for the Shell Valley Emergency Road Access project.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why the cap-and-trade bill regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas
emissions did not advance. Mr. Doubleday answered there was a great deal of effort on that in 2009 but
little in 2010. He anticipated the state was waiting for the federal government to act.
5. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE
NO. 3769, WHICH DEFINED TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTER AND IDENTIFIED
ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTERS ARE PERMITTED.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this item was the renewal of an interim zoning ordinance to
allow the Planning Board to complete their work. The interim ordinance clarifies that temporary homeless
shelters up to two weeks in length in any month are permitted in the City’s zoning classifications. Passage
of the ordinance renewing the interim zoning ordinance will provide sufficient time for the Planning
Board to complete their review and provide a recommendation to the City Council.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, explained City Attorney Scott Snyder attended a Planning Board meeting
approximately one month ago where Planning Board Members asked several questions. Mr. Rutledge
Packet Page 6 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 4
requested Councilmembers respond individually to those questions. He noted the Planning Board had
cancelled their public hearing on this matter.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
In response to Mr. Rutledge, City Attorney Scott Snyder explained staff will be responding to the
Planning Board’s questions at a future meeting. He explained via extension of the interim ordinance,
controls remain in place until a final ordinance is adopted.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3794, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3769, WHICH DEFINED TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTER AND
IDENTIFIED ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTERS ARE
PERMITTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, RENEWING INTERIM ORDINANCE 3779,
AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.110.040(F), MONETARY PENALTIES,
CLARIFYING THE IMPACT OF THE AMENDMENT ON EXISTING CODE ENFORCEMENT
ACTIONS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board has been briefed on this matter, City
Attorney Scott Snyder will brief them again next week and a public hearing is tentatively scheduled in
July. The interim ordinance amends the civil enforcement procedures to be consistent with state case law.
Mr. Snyder explained his memo referred to a 30-day Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) appeal period; the
appeal period is actually 21 days. He referenced RCW 36.70C.020, and explained since the City enacted
its provisions, LUPA now covers the enforcement by local jurisdiction of ordinances regulating the
improvement, development, modification, maintenance or use of real property. He recommended the
interim ordinance include that reference to provide direction to a citizen wishing to appeal.
For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Snyder cited Section 3 of the ordinance which states the
determination of the Hearing Examiner is final and shall be appealable to Superior Court in accordance
with Chapter 36.70A RCW.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
participation portion of the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3795, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3779, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.110.040(F), MONETARY
PENALTIES, CLARIFYING THE IMPACT OF THE AMENDMENT ON EXISTING CODE
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, RENEWING INTERIM ORDINANCE 3780,
ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT,
CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS AND STREET
VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this is an interim zoning ordinance being reviewed by the
Planning Board. The interim ordinance clarifies that provisions of the Comprehensive Plan that require
Packet Page 7 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 5
recommendation by the Hearing Examiner are still in the code. A public hearing is scheduled for June 23
and a recommendation to Council will follow.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if this also referred to property purchases by the City. Mr. Chave
answered yes; the Comprehensive Plan requires a recommendation from the Hearing Examiner in
addition to other procedures. Mr. Snyder explained for example staff had scheduled a hearing with the
Hearing Examiner to provide a recommendation prior to the closing date on the proposed purchase of the
Skipper’s property.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
participation portion of the public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3780, ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE
ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS AND
STREET VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS. MOTION FAILED (3-1), COUNCILMEMBER
FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the passage of an ordinance required a majority vote of the Council.
Mayor Haakenson advised this item would be scheduled on the June 15 Council agenda.
Mr. Snyder asked whether Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ concern was the ordinance obligated the
City to do something that was potentially unnecessary and time consuming. Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas answered yes. Mr. Snyder explained the wording in the interim ordinance was the exact wording
in the existing Comprehensive Plan provision, a provision that is currently being reviewed. The City’s
development code and Comprehensive Plan are required to be consistent. Staff agrees with
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ concern, however, until the Comprehensive Plan was amended, the
code and Comprehensive Plan must be consistent. The interim ordinance will ensure the City complies
with the Comprehensive Plan until that process is amended. He summarized an interim zoning ordinance
could be enacted in a short period of time; the Comprehensive Plan amendment process takes a year.
Mr. Chave advised the draft amendment that will be reviewed at the Planning Board public hearing will
be available on the City’s website prior to the public hearing.
8. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TITLE 19, ADOPTING UPDATED
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES.
Building Official Leonard Yarberry explained this ordinance repeals and revises elements of Title 19, the
City’s Building Code. The state mandates minimum building code standards to be enforced in all
jurisdictions, RCW 19.27. The state building code is updated on a 3-year cycle which mirrors the 3-year
national code cycle. The State Legislature adopted the 2009 international codes and mandates they be
enforced in all jurisdictions effective July 1. The proposed ordinance adopts the 2009 codes as stipulated
under the RCW and provides amendments that blend the codes into the framework of the Edmonds code.
There are also some proposed language changes to the ECDC to eliminate redundancies, delete
superseded codes and to simplify the format.
He summarized the proposed changes:
Consolidate administrative provisions: Each adopted code has its own separate administrative
section. The proposed ordinance uses the administrative provisions found in chapter one of the
Packet Page 8 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 6
International Building Code (IBC) for administration of the Building, Residential, Mechanical
and Plumbing codes.
Work exempt from a permit:
o Replacement of windows and doors in residential structures. He relayed his concern with this
exemption due to requirements for egress windows, window safety glazing and energy
efficiency requirements. His research of other jurisdictions found the majority used option 2
below. He reviewed three options for Council consideration:
1. Existing language
2. Modify existing language so that replacement of windows and doors in residential
structures are still exempt from permit provided they did not affect safety glazing or the
requirement for installation of egress windows. The determination would be made by the
homeowner or contractor.
3. Eliminate the exemption
o Replacement of individual deck member, joist, stair treads and intermediate rails. He relayed
his concern that a deck may be part of the egress system of a home. He reviewed options for
Council consideration:
1. Existing language
2. Delete the exemption
In 2008 the Council provided some extensions to permit application timelines in an effort to ease
the impact of the current economic situation. In 2009 an ordinance was enacted to provide
temporary relief on permit expiration timelines. The current code incorporated those provisions
by reprinting complete code sections with the effective dates of each. Consolidating those
provisions and removing redundancies eliminated approximately 14 pages of code text.
New additions to Title 19 include the International Property Maintenance Code which replaces
the 1997 Abatement of Dangerous Buildings Code and the 1997 Uniform Housing Code. The
existing Building Code replaces the Washington Sate Historic Building Code that is no longer
supported by the State. The International Performance Code is added as a tool to assist in the
evaluation of complex projects using performance techniques rather than prescriptive techniques.
Section 2 of the proposed ordinance (page 22), reference in Chapter 19.05.000 to Appendix
Chapters should also include Appendix G related to swimming pools.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 11 of the proposed ordinance and permits that expire in 180
days after issuance and may not be extended. She asked why those permits could not be extended, citing
an example of a homeowner who obtained a permit, lost their job and was later able to complete the deck.
Mr. Yarberry responded that was the current language in the code and had not been revised. Mr. Snyder
explained the expiration date was due to State vesting laws. Once an individual files a complete
application, the individual has the right to develop under current zoning codes. Without an expiration date
an individual would be vested in a particular project forever.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas preferred option 2 with regard to exempting residential replacement of
windows and doors in residential structures and retaining the current code language regarding exempting
decks from a permit. She was concerned that the more permits citizens were asked to apply for, the fewer
the city would actually receive. Mr. Yarberry explained his suggestion to delete the exemption was due to
the potential for safety concerns. The homeowner may build something incorrectly simply because they
are unaware how to do it correctly or hire a contractor who does it incorrectly. The funds generated from
those permits did not cover the work required; the permit was a service to the citizens rather than a
revenue generator.
Mr. Snyder suggested the Council provide direction regarding the options following the public hearing.
Packet Page 9 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 7
Council President Pro Tem Peterson thanked Mr. Yarberry for the incredible amount of work he had done
and for addressing the questions that Councilmembers Wilson, Councilmember Buckshnis and he asked
during the Committee meeting.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, suggested the City had a problem if the cost of a permit did not cover the work.
He suggested 2-3 year extensions be granted automatically and that no fee be required for permit
extensions.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the
public hearing
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PRO TEM PETERSON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3796 ADOPTING THE 2009
INTERNATIONAL CODES AND AMENDING TITLE 19 OF THE ECDC WITH THE
FOLLOWING OPTIONS: 1) OPTION 2 REGARDING EXEMPTING WINDOWS AND DOORS
IN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES ON PAGE 8, SECTION F, 2) MAINTAINING THE CURRENT
LANGUAGE EXEMPTING DECK REPLACEMENT PIECES ON PAGE 8, SECTION G, AND 3)
ADDING REFERENCE TO APPENDIX CHAPTER G ON PAGE 22 REGARDING SWIMMING
POOLS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, explained in the next 19 years, the ferry system plans to spend $54 million
in Edmonds. The ferry system’s long range plan states $27.7 million will be spent on the preservation of
the Main Street terminal at its current level of service. Specific amounts will be allocated to update wing
walls, dolphins, trestles and other components of the terminal. Use of the remaining $26 million is a
mystery. The long range plan identifies improvements at four ports in addition to their preservation:
replacement of significant elements including the north trestle and terminal building in Seattle;
construction of a replacement building larger and better suited to longer wait times and associated
terminal reconfiguration to improve circulation in Anacortes; and relocation to the tank farm east of the
current terminal not including overhead loading in Mukilteo. For Edmonds the long range plan states one
important project is scheduled to be completed in 2029-2031 biennium and will total $26 million and an
allowance of $26 million is included to enhance multimodal connections. She asked what important $26
million project would be constructed in Edmonds. At the next Council meeting she offered to review the
history of ferry improvements in Edmonds. She suggested a Councilmember research the $26 million
project.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, encouraged Councilmembers to attend Hearing Examiner and Planning Board
meetings, advising the Hearing Examiner meets twice a month on Thursdays at 3:00 p.m. and the
Planning Board meets twice a month on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. He urged the public to attend the
Waterfront Festival this weekend.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented since the Council’s attempted purchase of the Skipper’s
property, he has questioned the balance in the REET 1 and REET 2 funds. He questioned the use of
acquisition REET funds for bonded indebtedness rather than the REET fund that funds repairs,
particularly since several of the projects funded are repairs including the library and recreational facilities.
He recalled Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh stated recreational facilities and libraries were
not listed as an allowable use for REET 2. He asked City Attorney Scott Snyder to explain why bonded
indebtedness for recreational facilities and libraries were funded via the acquisition REET fund rather
than the repair fund. He suggested the bonded indebtedness for the library and recreational facilities be
paid from the repair fund in order to free up money in the acquisition fund.
Packet Page 10 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 8
10. RECONSIDERATION OF FUNDING SOURCE FOR CLIMATE SOLUTIONS NEW ENERGY
CITIES.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson explained on May 18 the Council approved funding for a partnership
with Climate Solutions to become a New Energy City and to increase the City’s energy independence. At
that meeting the $15,000 cost was funded from the Council’s professional services budget. Further
research by Council President Bernheim and staff determined the Council Contingency Fund was the
appropriate funding source.
Councilmember Plunkett inquired whether a reconsideration motion was necessary.
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the Council authorized a contract on May 18 and the source of
funding was now an issue. The Council’s designation of funding is not confirmed until approval of the
mid-year budget amendment.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE MAY 18 MOTION TO ACCEPT CLIMATE
SOLUTIONS’ PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED WITH FUNDS FROM THE PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES PORTION OF THE COUNCIL BUDGET. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED THAT THE FUNDING SOURCE
COME FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A
SECOND.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson asked whether the City still had a contract with Climate Solutions
and was it only the source of funding that was in question. Mr. Snyder responded the City Clerk was not
certain whether the contract had been signed.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained she had been approached by a citizen regarding the need to
spend $15,000 on this when the City was experiencing budgetary issues. She was in favor of the Council
having further discussion regarding the $15,000 expenditure. After rereading an earlier packet, it appeared
Climate Solutions’ proposal would be an interesting endeavor for the City but she was uncertain citizens
were supportive of the expenditure at this time or whether it should be considered during the budget
process.
Mayor Haakenson suggested having the City Clerk determine whether the contract had been signed and
schedule the matter on a future agenda. Mr. Snyder suggested the Council direct Mayor Haakenson and
the City Clerk not to execute the agreement and hold it for reconsideration. Mayor Haakenson commented
it was possible the contract had been signed based on previous Council action.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO DIRECT MAYOR HAAKENSON NOT TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT.
Councilmember Plunkett explained he did not support acceptance of Climate Solutions’ proposal on May
18 and did not support it at this time. He preferred to consider the expenditure as part of the budget
process.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised she received three phone calls and one person approached her
regarding the $15,000 expenditure. She suggested the City think locally, pointing out the numerous
citizens involved in Sustainable Edmonds. She also preferred to learn more about Climate Solutions.
Packet Page 11 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 9
Council President Pro Tem Peterson was uncertain what information was lacking with regard to Climate
Solutions and the contract, pointing out this topic had been on the agenda twice before tonight as well as
considered twice by the Community Services/Development Services Committee. He also provided the
May 18th materials to Councilmember Buckshnis who indicated that was the first time she had heard of it.
He explained Climate Solutions’ proposed contract described in detail how the funds would be used. To
Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Buckshnis’ comments that they had been contacted by citizens, he
assured he had been contacted by many more people thanking him for entering into a contract with
Climate Solutions. He commented an informal survey based on citizens contacting Councilmembers after
a vote was taken was not a good way to govern.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson pointed out Sustainable Edmonds was the organization that brought
Climate Solutions to Edmonds. He assured Climate Solutions was one of the most respected
environmental groups in the country if not the world. Their annual breakfast featured speakers Van
Johnson and King County Executive Dow Constantine, was attended by several State Senators, and raised
over $300,000. He assured Climate Solutions was not a fly-by-night organization but a group with years
of experience and provided the City the opportunity to be on the leading edge of a clean energy future. He
cited the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as an example of the need for the City to make a difference in its
energy future. He summarized the Council was elected to make smart investments and tough decisions.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented her decision was not based on one phone call or Senators
and Councilmembers who attended a breakfast, it was because this was a $15,000 expenditure of the
City’s budget, 1/4th the amount provided to the Senior Center and 1/5th provided for Yost Pool. She
suggested delaying the expenditure until the Council had a better idea of its fiscal future.
Councilmember Buckshnis acknowledged she was biased toward Climate Solutions. Her issue was the
need for additional information such as whether it was possible to fund the contract in $5,000 increments
rather than $15,000 which was 75% of the Council Contingency Fund. She agreed Climate Solutions was
a good group, concluding she needed time to determine whether local resources such as the Mayor’s
Climate Protection Committee could provide these services.
Councilmember Plunkett commented his motion was subject to someone returning the contract with
Climate Solutions to the Council in the future. He suggested it be considered during the budget process,
advising he would not support it then either.
MOTION CARRIED (3-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON VOTING NO.
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson informed the Council on June 8 at 6:00 p.m. they would be interviewing the three
finalists for the Public Works Director position. An interview team interviewed 6-7 candidates last week
from a pool of approximately 40-50 excellent applicants. He invited the Council to provide him their
feedback before he made his selection.
Mayor Haakenson reported yesterday’s Memorial Day ceremony was very well attended despite the rain.
He recognized the Cemetery Board for the amazing job they do organizing that event.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Pro Tem Peterson echoed Mayor Haakenson’s comments regarding the Memorial Day
service. He recognized Mayor Haakenson for his impassioned speech that acknowledged the meaning of
the day. He thanked the nearly 200 people who attended the service in the wind and rain to honor past and
present members of the military.
Packet Page 12 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 10
Councilmember Buckshnis provided a reminder of the Waterfront Festival this week sponsored by the
Rotary Club of Edmonds. The Tall Ships visit the city on Thursday; Lady Washington will be in at 2:00
p.m. and will stage a mock fight scene.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Caffe Ladro, the location of the May 28 Town Hall meeting. She
remarked it was interesting to hear about that community’s local concerns.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas echoed Councilmember Buckshnis’ comments regarding the Town Hall
meeting. She relayed the citizens’ thanks to Mayor Haakenson for the heartfelt speech he made at the
Memorial Day service.
Mayor Haakenson thanked Mr. Yarberry for his presentation regarding the revisions to Title 19.
Mayor Haakenson’s Resignation
Mayor Haakenson announced tomorrow at 8:00 a.m. he planned to hold an all-city employee meeting.
Two press releases will be issued tomorrow morning; the first from his office announcing he will be
resigning his position as Mayor at the end of the June. The second press release will be from the
Snohomish County Executive’s office to announce he will be appointed as the Deputy County Executive
for Snohomish County. He explained he is often asked what he will do when he is done being mayor; his
answer has always been something will come along. Although this time it came not at the best time,
opportunities come when they come. He explained the Council will be responsible for appointing an
interim mayor to fulfill the remaining 18 month mayoral term. The Council can appoint any registered
voter who has lived in the City for at least one year. Out of respect for City employees, he requested those
with Twitter, Facebook and blogs refrain from posting this announcement until 8:00 a.m. June 2 to allow
him to make the announcement to his staff.
City Attorney Scott Snyder distributed a memo containing the RCWs regarding appointment of a Mayor.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m.
Packet Page 13 of 304
AM-3139 2.C.
Approval of 06-08-10 City Council Meeting Minutes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of June 8, 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 06-08-10 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 01:00 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/09/2010 01:33 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 09:15 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/09/2010 12:53
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 14 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 8, 2010
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
June 8, 2010
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Steve Bernheim, Council President
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
DJ Wilson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/
Economic Development Director
Debi Humann, Human Resources Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
A special meeting of the Edmonds City Council was held at 6:00 p.m. to meet with two candidates for the
position of Public Works Director. The two candidates present were: Phil Williams and Chal Martin.
The meeting was held in the Council Chambers located in the Public Safety Complex, 250 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds.
An informal meeting was held from 6:00 p.m. to 6:10 p.m. where Councilmembers introduced themselves
and spoke with the candidates. At 6:10 p.m., all parties were seated at a table, and Councilmembers
interviewed the candidates. Candidates were each allowed an opportunity to provide closing comments.
Council President Bernheim stated that the Mayor would like input from Councilmembers concerning the
candidates as soon as possible. It was requested that the Council forward comments to the Senior
Executive Council Assistant which will then be forwarded to the Mayor and all Councilmembers.
At 6:30 p.m., the City Council adjourned to Committee Meetings.
Packet Page 15 of 304
AM-3147 2.D.
Approval of Claim Checks and Payroll Direct Deposit and Checks
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Debbie Karber
Submitted For:Lorenzo Hines Time:Consent
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #119247 through #119354 dated June 3, 2010 for $253,494.45, and
#119355 through #119518 dated June 10, 2010 for $836,348.05. Approval of payroll direct
deposit and checks #49359 through #49360 for the period May 16 through May 31, 2010 for
$644,533.27.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks and direct deposit and checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council.
Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends
either approval or non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Claim cks 6-3-10
Link: Claim cks 6-10-10
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Finance Lorenzo Hines 06/10/2010 04:12 PM APRV
2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:20 PM APRV
3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Debbie
Karber
Started On: 06/10/2010 02:30
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 16 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119247 5/28/2010 072772 T E BRIGGS CONSTRUCTION CO Payment 8 and 9 CORRECTION TO RETAINAGE
Correct payment #8 and payment #9
112.200.630.595.330.650.00 1,097.08
Total :1,097.08
119248 6/3/2010 072627 911 ETC INC 170213 MAY-10 911 DATABASE MAINT
May, 2010 911 database maint
001.000.310.518.880.480.00 101.50
Total :101.50
119249 6/3/2010 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 051810 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 1,276.50
INTERPRETER FEE51810
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 2,087.50
Total :3,364.00
119250 6/3/2010 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 510428 SOFTBALL T SHIRTS
SOFTBALL T-SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 1,674.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 159.12
Total :1,834.02
119251 6/3/2010 069157 AIONA, CYNDI AIONA12608 HULA CLASSES
HULA KIDS #12608
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 140.00
HULA ADULT #12610
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 423.50
Total :563.50
119252 6/3/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4932168 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 31.20
1Page:
Packet Page 17 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119252 6/3/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.96
Total :34.16
119253 6/3/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4912846 Street/Storm Unform Svc
Street/Storm Unform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.19
Street/Storm Unform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.19
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.21
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.21
Street/Storm Uniform Svc655-4924766
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.19
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.19
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.21
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.21
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4932169
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06
PW MATS655-4937220
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
2Page:
Packet Page 18 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119253 6/3/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
Total :66.95
119254 6/3/2010 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 55498 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 118.59
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 36.86
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 36.86
UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 37.99
UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 118.59
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.50
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.50
9.5% Sales Tax
3Page:
Packet Page 19 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119254 6/3/2010 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.61
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS55591
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 32.48
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 33.47
UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 108.97
UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 108.97
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 3.09
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 3.09
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 3.17
UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 32.48
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS55681
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.54
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.54
UB Outsourcing area #300 Printing
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 154.06
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 478.43
UB Outsourcing area #300 Postage
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 478.42
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 14.21
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 14.21
9.5% Sales Tax
4Page:
Packet Page 20 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119254 6/3/2010 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 14.63
Total :2,138.26
119255 6/3/2010 073035 AVAGIMOVA, KARINE 563 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 100.00
INTERPRETER FEES564
INTERPRETER FEES
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 100.00
Total :200.00
119256 6/3/2010 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON BAILEY12455 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON DO #12455
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 525.00
TAEKWON DO #12451
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 787.50
TAEKWON DO CLASSESBAILEY'S12459
TAEKWON-DO TOT #12459
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 136.50
TAEKWON DO TOT #12463
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 40.95
Total :1,489.95
119257 6/3/2010 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011509349 COPER RENTAL FEE
COPER RENTAL FEE
001.000.230.512.501.450.00 154.40
Total :154.40
119258 6/3/2010 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011509350 Canon 5870 7/1-7/31/10
Canon 5870 7/1-7/31/10
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 101.35
Canon 5870 7/1-7/31/10
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 101.32
Canon 5870 7/1-7/31/10
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 101.33
5Page:
Packet Page 21 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119258 6/3/2010 (Continued)070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING
Canon 5870 7/1 - 7/31/10
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 25.01
Canon 5870 7/1 - 7/31/10
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 25.00
Canon 5870 7/1 - 7/31/10
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 24.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.450.00 12.01
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.450.00 12.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.450.00 11.99
Total :415.00
119259 6/3/2010 073260 BERNARD MEEHAN ESTATE 3-59100 RE #110092-SB UTILITY REFUND
#110092-SB UB Ref Walbrun/Meehan
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 157.38
Total :157.38
119260 6/3/2010 071633 BLACK ROCK CABLE INC 15927 FIBER LEASE-7100 210TH TO 3000 ROCKFELLR
Jun-10 Fiber Lease - 7100 210th St SW
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 470.00
Franchise fee on Fiber Lease
001.000.310.518.870.450.00 23.50
Total :493.50
119261 6/3/2010 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 809829 INV#809829 EDMONDS PD - FROLAND
BLACKHAWK WARRIOR PANT
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 39.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 3.80
Total :43.75
119262 6/3/2010 070009 BOLA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 1 Museum - Exterior - Architect Services
Museum - Exterior - Architect Services
6Page:
Packet Page 22 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119262 6/3/2010 (Continued)070009 BOLA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
116.000.651.519.920.410.00 1,676.45
Total :1,676.45
119263 6/3/2010 069295 BROWN, CANDY BROWN0510 BIRD NATURALIST CLASSROOM VISITS
BIRD NATURALIST CLASSROOM VISITS MAY
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 42.00
Total :42.00
119264 6/3/2010 071942 CAMPBELL, JULANN CAMPBELL12476 OIL PAINTING CLASSES
OIL PAINTING #12476
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 369.60
OIL PAINTING #12477
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 431.20
Total :800.80
119265 6/3/2010 068484 CEMEX 9419367776 Roadway - Asphalt
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 598.91
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 56.90
Roadway - Asphalt9419386863
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 420.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 39.90
Roadway - Asphalt9419386864
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 520.48
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 49.45
Total :1,685.64
119266 6/3/2010 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT12538 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #12538
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 131.60
7Page:
Packet Page 23 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :131.60119266 6/3/2010 064840 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E
119267 6/3/2010 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 24892943 INV#24892943 ACCT#7898305185 EDMONDS PD
FUEL FOR NARCOTICS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 155.04
CAR WASH FOR NARCOTICS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 6.00
FUEL FOR TRAFFIC VEHICLE
001.000.410.521.710.320.00 36.86
Total :197.90
119268 6/3/2010 073238 CHRISTENSEN, RAYMOND AND CORRINE4-37575 #7-1003-004 UB REFUND
RE: # 7-1003-004 UB Refund Huang/
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 62.38
Total :62.38
119269 6/3/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7914 INV#7914 CUST#47 - EDMONDS PD
PRISONER R&B APRIL 2010
001.000.410.523.600.510.00 2,093.75
Total :2,093.75
119270 6/3/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2196249 Fac Maint - Towels, TT, Hand Soap,
Fac Maint - Towels, TT, Hand Soap,
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 295.82
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 28.10
Total :323.92
119271 6/3/2010 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0510 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 528.00
Total :528.00
119272 6/3/2010 069888 CONROY, LINDA CONROY12252 BASKETRY CLASS
BASKETRY: PINE NEEDLE #12252
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 84.00
8Page:
Packet Page 24 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :84.00119272 6/3/2010 069888 069888 CONROY, LINDA
119273 6/3/2010 073246 D SQUARE ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC WO-3126 Water/Sewer - Generator Svc
Water/Sewer - Generator Svc
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 326.25
Water/Sewer - Generator Svc
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 326.25
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 31.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 30.99
Total :714.49
119274 6/3/2010 029900 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS May 2010 drs MAY 2010 DRS
May 2010 DRS
811.000.000.231.540.000.00 135,284.43
Total :135,284.43
119275 6/3/2010 073262 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST 5-15900 RE 23706 74TH AVE W EDMONDS WA
23706 74th Ave W Edmonds UB Ref
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 572.83
Total :572.83
119276 6/3/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3101 MINUTE TAKING
05/25 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 252.00
Total :252.00
119277 6/3/2010 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 05312010 STATE LOBBYIST FOR MAY 2010
State lobbyist charges for May 2010
001.000.610.519.700.410.00 2,585.00
Total :2,585.00
119278 6/3/2010 071596 EBORALL, STEVE EBORALL12483 ART CLUB
ART CLUB #12483
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 207.20
9Page:
Packet Page 25 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :207.20119278 6/3/2010 071596 071596 EBORALL, STEVE
119279 6/3/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001144/1 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Mason's 1 3/4"
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.95
Total :10.94
119280 6/3/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 20437 Street - Concrete Saw Pump
Street - Concrete Saw Pump
111.000.653.542.310.350.00 109.99
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.350.00 10.45
Total :120.44
119281 6/3/2010 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP KO0513 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS FOR JOSEPH, PAUL AND
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 225.00
Total :225.00
119282 6/3/2010 071967 ENG, STEPHEN ENG12301 TAEKWON DO CLASSES
TAEKWON-DO #12301
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 117.60
Total :117.60
119283 6/3/2010 073258 ESTATE OF MARY A LANCASTER 5-13625 RE: 7-1004-049 UTILITY REFUND
7-1004-049 UB Ref Hugill/Lancaster
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 63.80
Total :63.80
119284 6/3/2010 073257 ESTATE OF PATRICIA J RIVARD 3-55625 RE 7-1004-050 UTILITY REFUND
7-1004-050 UB Refund Amundson-
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 77.28
Total :77.28
119285 6/3/2010 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 053110 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
10Page:
Packet Page 26 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119285 6/3/2010 (Continued)009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 10,290.00
Total :10,290.00
119286 6/3/2010 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 282920 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT
Jun-10 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent
001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00
Total :300.00
119287 6/3/2010 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 157552 May 2010 Section 125 & 132 plan fees
May 2010 Section 125 & 132 plan fees
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 79.40
Total :79.40
119288 6/3/2010 073265 FREESE LAW OFFICES INC PS 50510 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 200.00
Total :200.00
119289 6/3/2010 011910 GEOLINE BELLEVUE 305629 Storm - Juno - GIS Locating Device &
Storm - Juno - GIS Locating Device &
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 741.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.350.00 70.40
Total :811.40
119290 6/3/2010 073259 GLORIA MAE CAMPBELL, TRUSTEE 2-05575 RE: 10-214-JMO UTILITY REFUND
10-214-JMO UB Ref Scandora/G Campbell
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 71.94
Total :71.94
119291 6/3/2010 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 43 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 22.52
Total :22.52
11Page:
Packet Page 27 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119292 6/3/2010 071739 HOLZWART, JOHN HOLZWART12251 BROOM MAKING
BROOM MAKING #12251
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 63.00
Total :63.00
119293 6/3/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82193301 COPIER LEASE
COPIER LEASE IRC587OU
001.000.640.574.100.450.00 328.50
Total :328.50
119294 6/3/2010 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 6921826 C/A 768421
PR1-1 City Phone Service thru 5/25/10
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 933.17
Total :933.17
119295 6/3/2010 073219 INTELLITRAVEL MEDIA-BUDGET 89012477 TOURISM AD IN BUDGET TRAVEL JUNE 2010
Tourism ad in Budget Travel June 2010
120.000.310.575.420.440.00 723.00
Total :723.00
119296 6/3/2010 061844 INTL CONF OF POLICE CHAPLAINS 29897 INV#29897 - GAYDOS/EDMONDS PD
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP/GAYDOS
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 125.00
Total :125.00
119297 6/3/2010 065947 INTL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE TIMBROOK2010 RECERTIFICATION
DAVID TIMBROOK RECERTIFICATION
001.000.640.576.800.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
119298 6/3/2010 065873 ITE WASHINGTON STATE SECTION 2010 Annual Meeting ITE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING-HAUSS
ITE Annual Meeting-Hauss
001.000.620.532.200.490.00 110.00
Total :110.00
119299 6/3/2010 073247 JD NEWTON CONSTRUCTION, INC 1061 Fire Hydrant Install at Edmonds Yacht
Fire Hydrant Install at Edmonds Yacht
12Page:
Packet Page 28 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119299 6/3/2010 (Continued)073247 JD NEWTON CONSTRUCTION, INC
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 3,004.61
Total :3,004.61
119300 6/3/2010 073163 KINTZ, RYAN KINTZ0510 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT
VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT @ EDMONDS CC
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 140.00
Total :140.00
119301 6/3/2010 072059 LEE, NICOLE 1180 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 119.60
Total :119.60
119302 6/3/2010 068694 LONG, SOKHOM AN31566 OT for sick leave buy back not bought
OT for sick leave buy back not bought
411.000.655.535.800.110.00 112.28
Total :112.28
119303 6/3/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104254 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 37.22
SUPPLIES104262
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 24.58
Total :61.80
119304 6/3/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104259I Office Supplies - Mayor
Office Supplies - Mayor
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 83.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.310.00 7.98
Total :91.95
119305 6/3/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104323 Office Supplies for DS Department
Office Supplies for DS Department
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 714.70
13Page:
Packet Page 29 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119305 6/3/2010 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
HP 8500 Drum Kit for Planning Div104331
HP 8500 Drum Kit for Planning Div
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 226.65
Total :941.35
119306 6/3/2010 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 307294-00 City Hall - Supplies
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 56.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.34
Total :61.54
119307 6/3/2010 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1183 INTERPRETER FEE
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE1194
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE1195
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE1197
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE537
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 108.25
INTERPRETER FEE538
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE539
INTERPRETER FEE
001.000.390.512.520.410.00 88.25
INTERPRETER FEE540
INTERPRETER FEE
14Page:
Packet Page 30 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119307 6/3/2010 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA
001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25
Total :726.00
119308 6/3/2010 020120 MEB MANUFACTURING CO 26315 Unit 31 - Repairs
Unit 31 - Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 750.00
9.2% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 69.00
Total :819.00
119309 6/3/2010 068692 MILL SUPPLY, INC 741668 Unit 5 - Wiper Conversion
Unit 5 - Wiper Conversion
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 122.15
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.06
Total :132.21
119310 6/3/2010 073252 MILNER, STUART MILNER0510 LITTLE TIKES TENNIS COACH
LITTLE TIKES TENNIS COACH
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 40.00
Total :40.00
119311 6/3/2010 066553 MISTER T'S TROPHIES 85184 GYMNASTICS TROPHIES/PLAQUES
GYMNASTICS TROPHIES
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 235.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.550.310.00 22.35
Total :257.55
119312 6/3/2010 072492 MOLINA, NILDA MOLINA12467 ZUMBA
ZUMBA #12467
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 901.95
Total :901.95
119313 6/3/2010 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0424764-IN Fleet Unit 537 - Litter Bags (1000)
Fleet Unit 537 - Litter Bags (1000)
15Page:
Packet Page 31 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119313 6/3/2010 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 95.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.03
Fleet Filter Inventory0425195-IN
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 53.98
9.2% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 4.97
Total :162.98
119314 6/3/2010 024600 NEUERT, L L 44 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 2,270.36
Total :2,270.36
119315 6/3/2010 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB12375 FUN FACTORY
FUN FACTORY #12375
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 428.40
MINI ME FUN FACTORY #12392
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 432.24
Total :860.64
119316 6/3/2010 024910 NORMED 24808-588133 INV#24808-588133 EDMONDS PD
RELIEF-SF, COLD CAPLETS
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.40
PROPRINAL IBUPROFEN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 14.97
ASPIRIN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.10
NUTRALOX ANTACID
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.84
CETAFEN COUGH & COLD
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.60
CETAFEN, NON ASPIRIN
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 2.45
16Page:
Packet Page 32 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119316 6/3/2010 (Continued)024910 NORMED
CETAFEN EXTRA
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.28
Freight
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.42
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.90
Total :67.96
119317 6/3/2010 066787 NORTHWEST COMPUTER SUPPORT CINV22157 Shipping charges for return of unit
Shipping charges for return of unit
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 52.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 4.94
Total :56.94
119318 6/3/2010 073152 NORTHWEST GEOGRAPHICS INC 209 PW (Storm, Engineering) GIS Analyst
PW (Storm, Engineering) GIS Analyst
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 3,689.00
Water
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 773.50
Sewer
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 297.50
Total :4,760.00
119319 6/3/2010 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 130 ADB Minutetaker 5/5/10
ADB Minutetaker 5/5/10
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 256.00
HPC Minutetaker 5/13/10000 00 134
HPC Minutetaker 5/13/10
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 144.00
Total :400.00
119320 6/3/2010 070100 NW WA SUBSECTION, PNWS-AWWA 2706 TRAINING/DANIELSON
TRAINING/DANIELSON
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 155.00
17Page:
Packet Page 33 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :155.00119320 6/3/2010 070100 070100 NW WA SUBSECTION, PNWS-AWWA
119321 6/3/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 566187 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.230.512.501.310.00 65.70
Total :65.70
119322 6/3/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 024315 Office supplies - HR
Office supplies - HR
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 51.45
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.310.00 4.88
Total :56.33
119323 6/3/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 682428 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 189.74
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 18.02
Total :207.76
119324 6/3/2010 068600 OGAARD, BARBARA OGAARD0527 BEACH WALKS
TWO BEACH WALKS
001.000.640.574.350.410.00 45.00
Total :45.00
119325 6/3/2010 073253 PENN VALLEY PUMP CO. INC 06236 Rev 2 M-054 SLUDGE PUMP REPLACEMENT
M-054 SLUDGE PUMP REPLACEMENT
414.000.656.594.320.650.10 16,368.00
Total :16,368.00
119326 6/3/2010 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC 2010-3246 Jan - March 2010 PD testing fees
Jan - March 2010 PD testing fees
001.000.220.516.210.410.00 700.00
Total :700.00
119327 6/3/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL
18Page:
Packet Page 34 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119327 6/3/2010 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
YOST POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 1,297.54
Total :1,297.54
119328 6/3/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 184.93
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 182.73
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 418.94
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 20.41
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 77.53
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 77.53
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 77.53
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 77.53
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 77.54
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg3689976003
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 262.06
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE5254926008
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 257.71
19Page:
Packet Page 35 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119328 6/3/2010 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
Fire Station # 165322323139
Fire Station # 16
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 320.33
SEWER LIFT STATION #95672895009
SEWER LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.95
FLEET5903085008
Fleet 7110 210th St SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 240.58
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION6439566008
PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE STATION
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 375.56
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 1,732.18
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
FIRE STATION #209919661109
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 136.17
Total :4,641.96
119329 6/3/2010 073066 SAFARILAND LLC I10-035391 INV#I10-035391 - EDMONDS PD
CAP-SHURE SWABS
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 327.10
Freight
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 22.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 31.07
Total :381.16
119330 6/3/2010 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1101472 PRINTING PAWN SHOP FORMS
Printing Forms
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 125.21
20Page:
Packet Page 36 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119330 6/3/2010 (Continued)036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 11.89
Total :137.10
119331 6/3/2010 073237 SMITH, LYNN 1-39700 # 10030083NS UTILITY REFUND
RE:#10030083NS Utility Ref Moore/Smith
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 71.81
Total :71.81
119332 6/3/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200386456 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 144.30
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER200422418
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 3,037.21
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL W201265980
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 276.88
4 WAY LIGHT 599 MAIN ST201283892
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 51.29
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH PL W201374964
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 30.80
LS #15 7710 168TH PL SW201594488
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 29.51
DECO LIGHT 413 MAIN ST201656907
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 411.73
LOG CABIN202421582
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 218.99
Total :4,200.71
21Page:
Packet Page 37 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119333 6/3/2010 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC May-2010 05/10 RECREATION SERVIES CONTRACT FEE
May-10 Recreation Servies Contract Fee
001.000.390.519.900.410.00 5,000.00
Total :5,000.00
119334 6/3/2010 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 28853 FS 16 - Seal for Door
FS 16 - Seal for Door
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 150.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.25
Total :164.25
119335 6/3/2010 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON Unclaimed fds Comai Unclaimed Vickcky Comai Credit on Acct
Unclaimed Vickcky Comai Credit on Acct
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 13.00
Unclaimed Richard Holt 5/4/2005 Ck 20840Unclaimed fds Holt
Unclaimed Richard Holt 5/4/2005 Ck 20840
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 55.00
Total :68.00
119336 6/3/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2197800 Sr Center - Elect Supplies
Sr Center - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 79.50
Library - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 43.51
Parks - Elect Supplies
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 79.01
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.68
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 7.51
Total :221.21
119337 6/3/2010 070864 SUPERMEDIA LLC 360003354443 C/A 360000657091
Basic e-commerce hosting May-2010
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 34.95
22Page:
Packet Page 38 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119337 6/3/2010 (Continued)070864 SUPERMEDIA LLC
C/A 360000764828360003358937
May-10 Web Hosting for Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 34.95
C/A 430001405909440010450691
P&R Directory Listing Jun-10
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 130.25
Total :200.15
119338 6/3/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10990276 Storm - Hvy Weight Oil Absorbant Pads
Storm - Hvy Weight Oil Absorbant Pads
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 244.76
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 23.25
Total :268.01
119339 6/3/2010 073261 TESFAY, SENAIT 3-28825 RE: #001296979 UTILITY REFUND
001296979 UB Ref Drum-Haider/Tesfay
411.000.000.233.000.000.00 96.05
Total :96.05
119340 6/3/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1694456 NEWSPAPER AD
5/18 Hearing (PRD)
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 60.76
NEWSPAPER AD1696164
06/01 Hearing (Shelter)
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 55.72
Total :116.48
119341 6/3/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1694205 Legal Notice AMD2010-9 City
Legal Notice AMD2010-9 City
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 41.25
Legal Notice - PLN2010-19 Mujkanovic1695597
Legal Notice - PLN2010-19 Mujkanovic
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 33.88
Total :75.13
23Page:
Packet Page 39 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119342 6/3/2010 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC April2010-Edmonds-2 Prof Serv Additional retainer not
Prof Serv Additional retainer not
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 100.00
Total :100.00
119343 6/3/2010 062693 US BANK 2462 Domain Name Refistration
Domain Name Refistration
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 12.95
Printer-Tech-Fuser
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 129.00
Printer-Tech-Fuser Replacement Kit
001.000.230.512.500.310.00 168.00
Blue Dog Ink-Printer Ink Cart
001.000.310.518.880.310.00 856.96
Red Lion-Richland-Travel C Nelson
001.000.310.518.880.430.00 236.13
UPS
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 33.16
Solarwinds-Kiwi Syslog Server 12 mo
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 78.00
Late fee less test credit
001.000.310.518.880.490.00 21.29
Total :1,535.49
119344 6/3/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-AB8-1176 CITY PARK T1 LINE
City Park T1 Line 5/16-6/15/10
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 411.10
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet425-NW2-0887
Frame Relay for Snocom & Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 280.00
Total :691.10
119345 6/3/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-206-1108 TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 145.47
TELEMETRY LIFT STATIONS
24Page:
Packet Page 40 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119345 6/3/2010 (Continued)011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 270.16
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR425-206-1137
SEAVIEW RESERVOIR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 26.50
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-1141
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.53
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 34.41
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION425-206-4810
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 42.32
TELEMETRY LIFT STATION
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 78.58
LIFT STATION #1425-673-5978
Lift Station #1
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 50.06
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE425-712-8347
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG ELEVATOR PHONE
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 54.79
FS # 16425-771-0158
FS #16
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 124.88
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 110.24
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST425-778-3297
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 18.92
VACANT PW BLDG 200 DAYTON ST
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 35.14
Total :1,010.00
119346 6/3/2010 068265 VERIZON ONLINE 425-672-6030 WATER - 8505 BOWDOIN
LS - DSL Installation and Svc 4/20/10
25Page:
Packet Page 41 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119346 6/3/2010 (Continued)068265 VERIZON ONLINE
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 370.79
Total :370.79
119347 6/3/2010 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 0869486234 C/A 671247844-00001
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-Bldg
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 121.25
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-Eng
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 145.57
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service Fac-Maint
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 116.15
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-Parks
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 16.37
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service Parks Maint
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 63.94
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-PD
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 567.25
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-Planning
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 26.74
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-PW Street
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 20.05
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-PW Storm
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 42.08
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-PW Water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 103.35
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-PW Fleet
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 13.37
4/13-5/12/10 Cell Service-WWTP
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 40.11
C/A 571242650-00010872986247
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 100.02
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.250.514.300.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.230.512.500.420.00 114.02
26Page:
Packet Page 42 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119347 6/3/2010 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.800.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.558.600.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.610.519.700.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 307.63
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 119.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.514.230.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.220.516.100.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 399.84
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.210.513.100.420.00 177.13
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.640.574.100.420.00 74.75
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 1,100.46
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Air Cards
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 344.12
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
001.000.650.519.910.420.00 57.01
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 59.08
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
511.000.657.548.680.420.00 60.51
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 30.54
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 93.95
27Page:
Packet Page 43 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119347 6/3/2010 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
4/23-5-22-10 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 117.81
w/23-5/22/10 Blackberry Cell Phone
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 57.04
C/A 571242650-000010872986247
Credit FD BB Service 5/13-5/22/10
001.000.510.522.100.420.00 -18.92
Credit FD BB Service 5/13-5/22/10
001.000.510.522.200.420.00 -113.52
Credit FD BB Service 5/13-5/22/10
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 -18.35
Credit FD Aircard/Netbook Service 5/13-
001.000.510.522.300.420.00 -28.66
Total :4,651.76
119348 6/3/2010 062320 WA ST ARTS ALLIANCE FDN 2010-11 MEMBERSHIP
ANNUAL DUES
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
119349 6/3/2010 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2011-0541 INV# 2011-0541 EDMONDS PD- TRYKAR
INTERVIEW & INTERROG. 0222-1
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 25.00
INV# 2011-0560 EDMONDS PD - LAVELY2011-0560
FTO 0681-2 LAVELY
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 60.00
Total :85.00
119350 6/3/2010 073254 WAVE ELECTRIC, INC 1 C-328 300 PLC UPGRADE
C-328 300 PLC UPGRADE
414.000.656.594.320.650.10 7,380.52
9.5% Sales Tax
414.000.656.594.320.650.10 701.15
Total :8,081.67
28Page:
Packet Page 44 of 304
06/03/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
1:57:43PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119351 6/3/2010 073263 WCOPS JUNE 10, 2010 BULLETPROOF MIND - MARSH, FROLAND
MARSH - BULLETPROOF MIND
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 40.00
FROLAND - BULLETPROOF MIND
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 40.00
Total :80.00
119352 6/3/2010 049902 WHITMAN, TIMOTHY 45 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Reimbursement
009.000.390.517.370.230.00 663.74
Total :663.74
119353 6/3/2010 066289 WSTOA MAY 2010 INV. MAY 2010 - EDMONDS PD
2010 WSTOA TEAM MEMBERSHIP
001.000.410.521.230.490.00 100.00
Total :100.00
119354 6/3/2010 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 917 MAY, 2010 RETAINER
May, 2010 Retainer
001.000.360.515.230.410.00 11,330.00
Total :11,330.00
Bank total :253,494.45108 Vouchers for bank code :front
253,494.45Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report108
29Page:
Packet Page 45 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119355 6/10/2010 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 281524 RODENT CONTROL/MEADOWDALE
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 82.12
RODENT CONTROL281547
RODENT CONTROL
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 93.08
Total :175.20
119356 6/10/2010 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 610512 MARINE SANCTUARY T-SHIRTS
DISCOVERY PROGRAM: MARINE SANCTUARY
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 48.24
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.574.350.310.00 4.58
WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS610707
WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL SHIRTS
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 96.74
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.575.520.310.00 9.19
Total :158.75
119357 6/10/2010 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001225673 Public Works Facility
Public Works Facility
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 24.81
Public Works Facility
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 94.26
Public Works Facility
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 94.26
Public Works Facility
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 94.26
Public Works Facility
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 94.26
Public Works Facility
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 94.25
GARBAGE FOR F/S #160197001225743
garbage for F/S #16
1Page:
Packet Page 46 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119357 6/10/2010 (Continued)061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 127.89
garbage for MCC0197-001226410
garbage for MCC
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 58.40
Total :682.39
119358 6/10/2010 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 2074 TREE REMOVAL
TREE TAKE DOWN & BRANCH HAUL AWAY @
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 1,000.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.480.00 95.00
Total :1,095.00
119359 6/10/2010 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 11246 PLAQUE
PLAQUE FOR BENCH ON 5TH AVE S.
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 159.40
Freight
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 6.50
9.5% Sales Tax
127.000.640.575.500.310.00 15.76
Total :181.66
119360 6/10/2010 068330 AMERICAN PRINTING 44532 "While you were out" door hangers.
"While you were out" door hangers.
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 139.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.524.100.490.00 13.21
Total :152.21
119361 6/10/2010 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON0606 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 6/6/10
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 180.00
Total :180.00
119362 6/10/2010 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40356214 Unit 91 - Normal Duty Flange Unit
Unit 91 - Normal Duty Flange Unit
2Page:
Packet Page 47 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119362 6/10/2010 (Continued)065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 176.32
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.09
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 18.75
Total :216.16
119363 6/10/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4944459 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 31.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 2.96
Total :34.16
119364 6/10/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4937221 Street/Storm Uniform Svc
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.19
Street/Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.19
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.21
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.21
Fleet Uniform Svc655-4937222
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 6.30
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.60
Fac Maint Uniform Svc655-4944460
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06
PW Mats655-4948878
PW Mats
3Page:
Packet Page 48 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119364 6/10/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PW Mats
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW Mats
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW Mats
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PW Mats
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PW Mats
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
Total :69.05
119365 6/10/2010 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 045210 alerton system-PW Qtr PM Contract~
alerton system-PW Qtr PM Contract~
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 2,550.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 242.25
Total :2,792.25
119366 6/10/2010 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 13602 BURIAL SUPPLIES
BURIAL SUPPLIES: NARANCIC
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 388.00
4Page:
Packet Page 49 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119366 6/10/2010 (Continued)001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO
BURIAL SUPPLIES13842
BURIAL SUPPLIES: CHASE
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 388.00
Total :776.00
119367 6/10/2010 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0510 Background check services
Background check services
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 515.00
Total :515.00
119368 6/10/2010 073075 BAILEY DUSKIN PEIFFLE &8366-001 100964
May Legal Services for Fiber Project
001.000.310.518.870.410.00 4,375.00
Total :4,375.00
119369 6/10/2010 066891 BEACON PUBLISHING INC 4040 AD #2 - YOST POOL SWIM TEAM
AD #2/YOST POOL SWIM TEAM
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 137.00
Total :137.00
119370 6/10/2010 073271 BENNETT, BLAIR BENNETT060410 GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP
ASSIST WITH GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 50.00
GYMNASTICS SHOW TEAR DOWN
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 20.00
Total :70.00
119371 6/10/2010 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 0003206 E8GA.SERVICES THRU 5/21/10
E8GA.Services thru 5/21/10
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,081.54
Total :1,081.54
119372 6/10/2010 073250 BMI GENERAL LICENSING 19834993 LICENSING FEE
LICENSING FEE
117.100.640.573.100.490.00 305.00
5Page:
Packet Page 50 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :305.001193726/10/2010 073250 073250 BMI GENERAL LICENSING
119373 6/10/2010 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC IM36673 Unit 8 - Cap Assembly
Unit 8 - Cap Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 35.75
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.45
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.05
Total :58.25
119374 6/10/2010 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BROCKMANN12508 YOGA CLASSES
YOGA #12508
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 724.50
PILATES #12405
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 172.20
YOGA #12505
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 352.80
YOGA #12513
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 644.00
YOGA CLASSESBROCKMANN12516
YOGA #12516
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 418.60
Total :2,312.10
119375 6/10/2010 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE12414 PRENATAL YOGA
PRENATAL YOGA #12414
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 215.60
Total :215.60
119376 6/10/2010 071510 BUCK, ALICIA BUCK12437 ART FOR KIDZ
MINI MARKERS #12437
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 378.00
DOODLE DOTS #12436
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 220.50
Total :598.50
6Page:
Packet Page 51 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119377 6/10/2010 065565 BUD CLARY CHEVROLET 9962 Unit eq63eq - New 2010 Chev Exp Van~
Unit eq63eq - New 2010 Chev Exp Van~
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 21,598.00
Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 1,771.04
Total :23,369.04
119378 6/10/2010 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA CARLSON12439 ART FOR KIDZ
ADVENTURES IN DRAWING #12439
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 340.20
Total :340.20
119379 6/10/2010 070892 CASCADE BANK E6DA.PMT 9 RET E6DA.PRECISION RET 9
E6DA.Precision Ret 9
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 11,297.48
Total :11,297.48
119380 6/10/2010 068484 CEMEX 9419415421 Storm - Dump Fees
Storm - Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 74.62
Roadway - Asphalt9419426869
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 26.60
Total :381.22
119381 6/10/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY156637 HELIUM
COMPRESSED HELIUM
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 191.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.23
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICSRN05101036
HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS PARTY BALLOONS
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 8.30
9.5% Sales Tax
7Page:
Packet Page 52 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119381 6/10/2010 (Continued)003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
001.000.640.575.550.450.00 0.79
Total :219.29
119382 6/10/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 156813 Fleet Shop - Work Gloves
Fleet Shop - Work Gloves
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 16.06
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.350.00 1.53
Total :17.59
119383 6/10/2010 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT12539 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT
FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #12539
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 75.60
Total :75.60
119384 6/10/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7941 INV#7941 CUST#1430 - EDMONDS PD
VERIZON PHONES 05/10 - NARCS
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 53.66
INV#7942 CUST#45 - EDMONDS PD7942
NEXTEL PHONES - NARCS 05/2010
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.61
Total :110.27
119385 6/10/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7873 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS
411.000.655.535.800.472.00 13,800.83
Total :13,800.83
119386 6/10/2010 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 Water Useage for the Month of May 2010
Water Useage for the Month of May 2010
411.000.654.534.800.330.00 537.30
Total :537.30
119387 6/10/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2191999-1 TOWELS
TOWELS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 92.49
8Page:
Packet Page 53 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119387 6/10/2010 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.79
Total :101.28
119388 6/10/2010 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA060410 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 144.00
Total :144.00
119389 6/10/2010 070323 COMCAST 8498310300721433 CEMETERY INTERNET ACCESS
INTERNET ACCESS FOR CEMETERY OFFICE
130.000.640.536.200.420.00 113.55
Total :113.55
119390 6/10/2010 062891 COOK PAGING WA 7925883 pagers-water - May & June 2010 Pmt
pagers-water - May & June 2010 Pmt
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 7.90
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 0.58
Total :8.48
119391 6/10/2010 066802 CURRAN, JESSE AM89422 Time loss not used for sick leave buy
Time loss not used for sick leave buy
001.000.640.576.800.110.00 664.82
Total :664.82
119392 6/10/2010 072189 DATASITE 65819 INV#65819 - EDMONDS PD
SHREDDING 1-64 GALLON TOTE
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 40.00
SHREDDING 100 (10) EXTRA BOXES
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 40.00
Total :80.00
119393 6/10/2010 072189 DATASITE 65793 SHREDDING SERVICES/CABINETS
Doc Shred Services City Clerk
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 25.00
9Page:
Packet Page 54 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119393 6/10/2010 (Continued)072189 DATASITE
Doc Shred Services Finance
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 25.00
Total :50.00
119394 6/10/2010 073251 DEARN-TARPLEY, SUSAN DEARN-TARPLEY0524 REIMBURSEMENTS
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT/DISCOVERY PROGRAM
001.000.640.574.350.430.00 65.00
REIMBURSEMENT FOR UNIFORM PANTS
001.000.640.574.350.240.00 6.56
Total :71.56
119395 6/10/2010 069479 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PW132872 LOAN# PW-02-691-019 CTED# 10869
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
411.000.655.582.100.780.00 36,450.00
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
411.000.655.592.100.830.00 2,369.25
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
414.000.656.582.100.780.00 34,875.00
Pr & Int Pmt CTED 10869 2002 Sanitary
414.000.656.592.100.830.00 2,266.87
LOAN #PW-02-691-PRE-123 CTED #11830PW132976
Pr Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW
112.506.630.591.950.780.00 18,143.27
Int Pmt CTED 11830 220th St SW
112.506.630.592.950.830.00 1,179.31
LOAN# PW-04-691-029 CTED# 13873PW132977
Pr Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW
112.506.630.591.951.780.00 21,176.47
Int Pmt CTED 13873 220th St SW
112.506.630.592.951.830.00 1,588.24
LOAN# PW-04-691-030 CTED# 13818PW133022
Pr Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Outfall
411.000.652.582.100.780.00 32,062.50
Int Pmt CTED 13818 Stormwater Outfall
411.000.652.592.100.830.00 2,404.69
10Page:
Packet Page 55 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119395 6/10/2010 (Continued)069479 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
LOAN# PW-04-691-031 CTED# 13819PW133063
Pr Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump Station
411.000.654.582.100.780.00 24,269.74
Int Pmt CTED 13819 5 Corner Pump
411.000.654.592.100.830.00 1,522.73
LOAN# PW-05-691-015 CTED# 15162PW-133100
Pr Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Station
411.000.655.582.350.780.00 67,614.82
Int Pmt CTED 15162 Sewer Lift Station
411.000.655.592.350.830.00 4,965.52
LOAN #PW-06-962-012 CTED# 17005PW133197
Pr Pmt CTED 17005 100th Ave W
112.200.630.591.950.781.00 32,881.58
Int Pmt CTED 17005 100th Ave W
112.200.630.592.950.831.00 2,794.93
Total :286,564.92
119396 6/10/2010 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2010050117 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for May, 2010
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 268.46
Total :268.46
119397 6/10/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3104 MINUTE TAKING
06/01/10 Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 159.00
Total :159.00
119398 6/10/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001143/1 PARKS & REC
SPRAYER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.80
PARKS & REC001145/1
HOOKS
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 8.97
11Page:
Packet Page 56 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119398 6/10/2010 (Continued)073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 0.85
PARKS & REC001147/1
WASP & HORNET SPRAY
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 34.43
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.27
PARKS & REC001148/1
PREMIUM SPRAYER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 24.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.37
Total :95.67
119399 6/10/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001146/1 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
Old PW - Art Works
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.99
Fac Maint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.97
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE001149/1
Library - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.08
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.48
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE001150/1
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.78
Small Tools - Square Combo, Recip Saw
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 109.98
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.350.00 10.45
12Page:
Packet Page 57 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :163.251193996/10/2010 073037 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE
119400 6/10/2010 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP VIAR0526 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP: HAILEI VIAR
122.000.640.574.100.490.00 75.00
Total :75.00
119401 6/10/2010 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-38565 WATER
18410 92ND AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 23.80
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK6-00025
CITY MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 122.27
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM6-00200
CITY FISHING DOCK & RESTROOM
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 304.79
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 184.69
MINI PARK6-00475
MINI PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 433.60
CITY PARK BALLFIELD6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 140.70
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 722.90
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 161.02
WATER6-02727
310 6TH AVE N
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 138.65
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD - SPRINKLER
13Page:
Packet Page 58 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119401 6/10/2010 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)6-02900
ANDERSON CULTURAL CENTER (SPRINKLER)
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 136.61
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 258.56
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 89.61
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK6-03575
CITY MAPLEWOOD PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 161.83
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 138.65
WATER6-04425
8100 185TH PL SW
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 289.03
SIERRA PARK6-04450
SIERRA PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 199.54
BALLINGER PARK6-07775
BALLINGER PARK
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 174.09
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 647.66
YOST PARK POOL6-08525
YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 379.31
Total :4,843.92
119402 6/10/2010 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 087834 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT
Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - July
14Page:
Packet Page 59 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119402 6/10/2010 (Continued)031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 152.00
Total :152.00
119403 6/10/2010 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 055713 Canon 5870 copies (color) 5/7 - 6/7/10
Canon 5870 copies (color) 5/7 - 6/7/10
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 55.58
Canon 5870 copies (color) 5/7 - 6/7/10
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 55.56
Canon 5870 copies (color) 5/7 - 6/7/10
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 55.55
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.610.519.700.480.00 5.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.220.516.100.480.00 5.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.210.513.100.480.00 5.28
Total :182.53
119404 6/10/2010 066004 ESRI 92174632 ArcGIS License & Installation Pkg
ArcGIS License & Installation Pkg
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 375.00
ArcGIS License & Installation Pkg
411.000.652.542.400.410.00 375.00
ArcGIS License & Installation Pkg
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 375.00
ArcGIS License & Installation Pkg
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 375.00
Freight
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 2.76
Freight
411.000.652.542.400.410.00 2.76
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 2.76
Freight
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 2.77
15Page:
Packet Page 60 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119404 6/10/2010 (Continued)066004 ESRI
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.518.880.410.00 35.89
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.410.00 35.89
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 35.89
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 35.88
Total :1,654.60
119405 6/10/2010 069042 EVERETT HYDRAULICS INC 0000014374 Unit 98 - Hydraulic Repairs
Unit 98 - Hydraulic Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 1,505.00
9.2% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 138.46
Total :1,643.46
119406 6/10/2010 009800 FACTORY DIRECT TIRE SALES 38947 TUBES
TUBES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 40.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.85
Total :44.35
119407 6/10/2010 066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W FELIX12248 WEIGHT LOSS WITH HYPNOSIS
WEIGHT LOSS WITH HYPNOSIS #12248
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 436.10
Total :436.10
119408 6/10/2010 069940 FIRST ADVANTAGE SBS 202703 INV# 202703 ACCT # ODY900JJM EDMONDS PD
CREDIT REPORT - BRILL
001.000.410.521.100.410.00 10.50
Total :10.50
119409 6/10/2010 073264 FRAUSTO, AARON 5/24/10 WSHNA CONFERENCE EXPENSE CLAIM
FRAUSTO BREAKFAST 5/24/10
16Page:
Packet Page 61 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119409 6/10/2010 (Continued)073264 FRAUSTO, AARON
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.55
FRAUSTO DINNER 5/24/10
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.01
FRAUSTO BREAKFAST 5/25/10
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 10.79
FRAUSTO BREAKFAST 5/26/10
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 8.55
ROOM-WSHNA CONF - LINDA MACK
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 295.84
ROOM -WSHNA CONF - FRAUSTO & FROLAND
001.000.410.521.400.430.00 298.34
Total :634.08
119410 6/10/2010 072932 FRIEDRICH, KODY FRIEDRICH12604 IRISH DANCE CLASSES
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #12604
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 68.25
IRISH DANCE 13+
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 72.80
IRISH DANCE 13+ #12562
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 89.70
Total :230.75
119411 6/10/2010 073269 GACKE, ROBERT 0370346 REF SPAY/NEUTER REDUND INV#0370346
SPAY/NEUTER REFUND IMP#8056
001.000.000.343.930.000.00 50.00
Total :50.00
119412 6/10/2010 071945 GILL-ROSE, SUE ROSE12306 DRAWING & WATERCOLOR CLASSES
BEGINNING DRAWING #12306
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 462.00
BEGINNING WATERCOLOR #12307
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 539.00
Total :1,001.00
119413 6/10/2010 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 094463 Unit 133 - (2) Tires
17Page:
Packet Page 62 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119413 6/10/2010 (Continued)063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
Unit 133 - (2) Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 229.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 21.79
Unit 36 - (4) Tires094881
Unit 36 - (4) Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 424.72
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 40.35
Unit 251 - (4) Tires095023
Unit 251 - (4) Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 247.76
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.54
Fleet - Tire (16) Inventory095030
Fleet - Tire (16) Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 1,509.44
Scrap Tire Disposal
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 36.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.30 143.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.42
Unit 251 - Scrap Tire Disposal095032
Unit 251 - Scrap Tire Disposal
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 20.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.90
Unit 121 - (3) Tires095260
Unit 121 - (3) Tires
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 312.36
Total :3,014.08
119414 6/10/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9263203508 FUEL CAN
GAS CAN
18Page:
Packet Page 63 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119414 6/10/2010 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 28.25
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.37
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.48
HEADGEAR9263507528
HEADGEAR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 43.16
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.42
FACESHIELDS9263507536
FACESHIELDS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.04
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.50
HEADGEAR9264499717
HEADGEAR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.37
Freight
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.46
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.30
Total :180.97
119415 6/10/2010 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC 06713.00-32 E6DA.SERVICES THRU 5/1/10
E6DA.Services thru 5/1/10
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 8,951.25
E6DA.SERVICES THRU 5/29/1006713.00-33
E6DA.Services thru 5/29/10
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 1,207.12
19Page:
Packet Page 64 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :10,158.371194156/10/2010 071391 071391 GRAY & OSBORNE INC
119416 6/10/2010 073273 GUARANTEE TRUST LIFE DOS 10/22/2009 PATIENT NAME: HAROLD C SCHNACK
Refund for EMS transport Ins pd claim
001.000.000.342.601.000.00 47.46
Total :47.46
119417 6/10/2010 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 321738 Unit 582 - Battery
Unit 582 - Battery
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 119.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 11.40
Unit 203 - Oil, Spark Plugs, Filters,324031
Unit 203 - Oil, Spark Plugs, Filters,
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 487.67
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 46.33
Fleet - Belt Supplies324033
Fleet - Belt Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 23.19
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.20
Unit 203 - Filter, Bracket, Supplies325488
Unit 203 - Filter, Bracket, Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 158.35
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.04
Total :864.17
119418 6/10/2010 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 107806 Unit 39 - Valve Assembly
Unit 39 - Valve Assembly
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.52
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.04
Total :46.56
119419 6/10/2010 073256 HEARTHSIDE & HOME BLD20100328 Permit Voided - Online permit - not in
20Page:
Packet Page 65 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119419 6/10/2010 (Continued)073256 HEARTHSIDE & HOME
Permit Voided - Online permit - not in
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 135.00
Total :135.00
119420 6/10/2010 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 22090R E8FD.SERVICES THRU 4/2/10
E8FD.Services thru 4/2/10
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 30,256.37
E8FD.SERVICES THRU 04/30/1022333
E8FD.Services thru 04/30/10
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 10,283.29
E8FD.SERVICES THRU 5/28/1022480
E8FD.Services thru 5/28/10
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 11,188.87
Total :51,728.53
119421 6/10/2010 069164 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 47624013 Docking Stations for Engineering Laptops
Docking Stations for Engineering Laptops
411.000.654.534.800.350.00 264.00
Docking Stations for Engineering Laptops
411.000.655.535.800.350.00 264.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.350.00 25.08
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.350.00 25.08
Laptops for Engineering47693845
Laptops for Engineering
411.000.654.534.800.350.00 2,968.00
Laptops for Engineering
411.000.655.535.800.350.00 2,968.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.350.00 281.96
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.350.00 281.96
Total :7,078.08
21Page:
Packet Page 66 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119422 6/10/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1035400 0205
PVC CEMENT, NOZZLE, PRIMER, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 126.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.02
02051064551
PLUGS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.47
02051194279
PEAT
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 270.48
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 25.70
02053094249
SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.29
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.74
02057043180
REBAR
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 44.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.26
02058044938
HAMMER
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 21.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.09
02058262071
SAKRETE, ETC.
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.54
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.09
22Page:
Packet Page 67 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :568.901194226/10/2010 067862 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
119423 6/10/2010 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 8941 Fac Maint - Supplies
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 281.90
PW - Chair Mat
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.15
Fac Maint - Suppleis
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 254.14
Total :567.19
119424 6/10/2010 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 21171 E8GC.TESTING
E8GC.Testing
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 400.00
E4GA.SPECIAL INSPECTIONS/QA TESTING21174
E4GA.Special Inspections/QA Testing
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 855.00
E8GC.GEOTECH & ENVIRONMENTAL21178
E8GC.Geotech & Environmental
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 1,099.17
E8GC.Geotech & Environmental
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,099.17
E8GC.Geotech & Environmental
412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,099.16
Total :4,552.50
119425 6/10/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82226622 COPIER LEASE
PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 26.34
Total :26.34
119426 6/10/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82226621 C/A 467070-1003748A4
Finance Copier Rental 5/22-6/21/10
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07
Additional Copies 3/29-4/23/10
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 108.29
23Page:
Packet Page 68 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119426 6/10/2010 (Continued)070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.450.00 53.43
Total :615.79
119427 6/10/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82240800 Rent on reception copier from
Rent on reception copier from
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 30.66
Total :30.66
119428 6/10/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5014169969 Rent on reception copier. Billing
Rent on reception copier. Billing
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 7.36
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 0.70
Rent on large copier for billing period5014255531
Rent on large copier for billing period
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 50.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 4.84
Rent on Engineering copiers billing5014255532
Rent on Engineering copiers billing
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 401.40
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 38.13
Total :503.38
119429 6/10/2010 068952 INFINITY INTERNET 2909880 PRESCHOOL INTERNET SERVICE
INTERNET SERVICE FOR MEADOWDALE
001.000.640.575.560.420.00 15.00
Total :15.00
119430 6/10/2010 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS 512224 Unit 132 - Sol/Relay 12V
Unit 132 - Sol/Relay 12V
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 112.14
9.5% Sales Tax
24Page:
Packet Page 69 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119430 6/10/2010 (Continued)069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.65
Unit 24 - Li-Ion Sabr512225
Unit 24 - Li-Ion Sabr
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 79.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.60
Fleet Credit Adjustment512641
Fleet Credit Adjustment
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -89.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -8.55
Unit 338 - Sol/Relay 12V513769
Unit 338 - Sol/Relay 12V
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 74.76
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.10
Unit 336 - Sol/Relay 12V513770
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.55
Unit 336 - Sol/Relay 12V
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.38
Fleet Supplies - Wipers, Supplies514231
Fleet Supplies - Wipers, Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 147.86
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 16.60
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 15.62
Unit eq63eq - Supplies514996
Unit eq63eq - Supplies
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 55.40
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 8.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 6.06
25Page:
Packet Page 70 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119430 6/10/2010 (Continued)069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS
Unit eq63eq - LEDs515276
Unit eq63eq - LEDs
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 25.90
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 8.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 3.26
Fleet Shop Supplies515962
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 134.98
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.311.00 12.82
Total :669.89
119431 6/10/2010 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY ULVESTAD12597 DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY #12597
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 196.00
Total :196.00
119432 6/10/2010 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 3400976 INV#3400976 - EDMONDS PD
MULTI USE COPY PAPER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 50.76
HANDLING FEE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.82
Total :65.74
119433 6/10/2010 063501 KENS CAMERA INC 55704 INV#55704, ACCT#16778 - EDMONDS PD
DEVELOP/PRINT 4x6
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 6.39
REPRINTS 4x6 FROM 35MM FILM
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 156.00
Freight
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 10.00
26Page:
Packet Page 71 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119433 6/10/2010 (Continued)063501 KENS CAMERA INC
Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 15.86
Total :188.25
119434 6/10/2010 070285 KPLU-FM IN-1100521913 RADIO ADVERTISING
Radio advertising for week of 5/17/10.
001.000.240.513.110.440.00 950.00
Total :950.00
119435 6/10/2010 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 05172010-03 City Cars - (3) Washes
City Cars - (3) Washes
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 15.09
Total :15.09
119436 6/10/2010 017060 L & O DISTRIBUTING CO 83678 FAC - Thermostatic Radiator CTL
FAC - Thermostatic Radiator CTL
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 59.73
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.67
Total :65.40
119437 6/10/2010 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 188183 Unit 55 - (4) Tires and Supplies
Unit 55 - (4) Tires and Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 933.72
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 88.70
Total :1,022.42
119438 6/10/2010 069634 LEXISNEXIS 1201641-20100531 INV# 1201641-20100531 EDMONDS PD
MINIMUM MONTHLY CHARGE
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 50.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.410.00 4.75
Total :54.75
119439 6/10/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104384 INV#104384 - EDMONDS PD
27Page:
Packet Page 72 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119439 6/10/2010 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS
5,000 #10 POLICE DEPT ENVELOPES
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 274.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 26.03
Total :300.03
119440 6/10/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104371 VHS tapes, Jewel Cases Council Office
VHS tapes, Jewel Cases Council Office
001.000.110.511.100.310.00 34.50
Total :34.50
119441 6/10/2010 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 605375 Unit 55 - Silicon
Unit 55 - Silicon
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.99
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.23
Unit 26 - Supplies605761
Unit 26 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.75
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.74
Unit 8 - Oil & Fuel Filters605939
Unit 8 - Oil & Fuel Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.35
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.17
Unit 405 - Hose Supplies606040
Unit 405 - Hose Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 28.20
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.68
Unit 134 - Supplies606135
Unit 134 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 26.36
9.5% Sales Tax
28Page:
Packet Page 73 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119441 6/10/2010 (Continued)018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.50
Fleet - Return item credit606178
Fleet - Return item credit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -9.21
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -0.87
Unit 134 - Supplies606200
Unit 134 - Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 41.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.94
Unit 133 - Fuel Filter606492
Unit 133 - Fuel Filter
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.94
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.66
Unit 38 - Brake Fluid606768
Unit 38 - Brake Fluid
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.49
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.57
Unit 121 - Oil Pressure Gauge606907
Unit 121 - Oil Pressure Gauge
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 17.05
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.62
Unit M-16607347
Unit M-16
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 2.79
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.27
Total :178.72
119442 6/10/2010 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 703547 SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
29Page:
Packet Page 74 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119442 6/10/2010 (Continued)018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.45
BEARINGS, GASKETS, ETC.705665
BEARINGS, GASKETS, PINS, WASHERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 89.09
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.46
CABLE705955
CABLE FOR MOWERS
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.59
Total :121.13
119443 6/10/2010 072886 MACDONALD-MILLER FAC.SOLUTIONS SVC004026 YOST POOL FILTER PUMP
YOST POOL FILTER PUMP/POOL UPGRADE
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 3,919.80
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 372.38
Total :4,292.18
119444 6/10/2010 073188 MADDEN MEDIA LLC 201003668 EXPERIENCEWA INTERACTIVE ONLINE CO-OP AD
ExperienceWa Interactive Online Co-op
001.000.240.513.110.440.00 2,500.00
Total :2,500.00
119445 6/10/2010 073270 MARTIN, DEVIN MARTIN0604 GYMNASTICS SHOW SETUP
GYMNASTICS SHOW SET UP 6/4/10
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 50.00
Total :50.00
119446 6/10/2010 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 36892 YOST POOL SPA HEATER
YOST POOL SPA HEATER
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 3,100.00
30Page:
Packet Page 75 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119446 6/10/2010 (Continued)019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.480.00 294.50
YOST POOL SUPPLIES54181
YOST POOL CHEMICALS/SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 198.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 18.89
Total :3,612.24
119447 6/10/2010 072010 MEISER, GARLAND MEISER0610 PICKLE BALL LEAGUE ATTENDANT
PICKLEBALL LEAGUE ATTENDANT @ ANDERSON
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 72.00
Total :72.00
119448 6/10/2010 063773 MICROFLEX 00019324 APR-10 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
Apr-10 Tax Audit Program
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 99.69
Total :99.69
119449 6/10/2010 020495 MIDWAY PLYWOOD INC 58411 MCH - Wood, Moldings, Supplies
MCH - Wood, Moldings, Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 177.39
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 16.85
Total :194.24
119450 6/10/2010 073252 MILNER, STUART MILNER0605 GYMNASTICS SHOW TEAR DOWN
ASSISTING WITH GYMNASTICS SHOW TEAR
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 20.00
Total :20.00
119451 6/10/2010 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC 110201227 Unit 76 - Zipper Supplies
Unit 76 - Zipper Supplies
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 182.29
9.2% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.77
31Page:
Packet Page 76 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :199.061194516/10/2010 021983 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC
119452 6/10/2010 063777 MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP.1006007 SOFTWARE SUPPORT
Maintenance Fees
001.000.250.514.300.480.00 499.00
Total :499.00
119453 6/10/2010 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0429288-IN Fleet - Filters
Fleet - Filters
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.73
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.21
Fleet Inventory - Filters0429336-IN
Fleet Inventory - Filters
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 26.10
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 2.48
Total :42.52
119454 6/10/2010 065315 NEWCOMB, TRACY NEWCOMB0603 FUN FACTORY
FUN FACTORY #12376
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 478.38
Total :478.38
119455 6/10/2010 068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1023753 Street - Unit 14 - Anti Ice Equipment
Street - Unit 14 - Anti Ice Equipment
111.000.653.542.710.350.00 7,473.86
Freight
111.000.653.542.710.350.00 418.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.710.350.00 749.73
Total :8,641.59
119456 6/10/2010 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-126385 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: HICKMAN PARK
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 305.16
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-126852
32Page:
Packet Page 77 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119456 6/10/2010 (Continued)061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: YOST PARK POOL
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 222.89
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-131597
HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: CIVIC FIELD
001.000.640.576.800.450.00 189.87
Total :717.92
119457 6/10/2010 073152 NORTHWEST GEOGRAPHICS INC 210 PW GIS ANALYST
PW (Storm, Engineering) GIS Analyst
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 3,332.00
Water
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 595.00
Sewer
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 416.50
Total :4,343.50
119458 6/10/2010 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 137 ADB Minutes on June 2, 2010.
ADB Minutes on June 2, 2010.
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 160.00
Total :160.00
119459 6/10/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 778127 INV#778127 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
COVEY CALENDAR REFILL
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 20.31
MANILA FOLDERS-LETTER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 8.39
STAPLER
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 9.15
HEATSEAL POUCH-INDEX SIZE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.38
HEATSEAL POUCH-LETTER SIZE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 10.63
HEATSEAL POUCH-LEGAL SIZE
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 13.51
9.5% Sales Tax
33Page:
Packet Page 78 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119459 6/10/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
001.000.410.521.100.310.00 6.40
INV#813143 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD813143
HEATSEAL POUCH-INDEX SIZE
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 37.66
GEL WRIST REST
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 15.39
GEL MOUSEPAD/MOUSING SURFACE
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 14.29
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 3.58
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 2.82
Total :147.51
119460 6/10/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 631008 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 172.21
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 16.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES766902
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 128.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 12.23
Total :329.56
119461 6/10/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 740437 PW Admin - Supplies - Clip Boards,
PW Admin - Supplies - Clip Boards,
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 43.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 4.12
Total :47.56
119462 6/10/2010 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER May, 2010 MAY COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL
May-10 Emergency Medical Services &
34Page:
Packet Page 79 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119462 6/10/2010 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER
001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,345.89
May-10 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.000.237.130.000.00 29,252.73
May-10 Building Code Fee Account
001.000.000.237.150.000.00 152.00
May-10 State Patrol Death
001.000.000.237.170.000.00 647.38
May-10 Judicial Information Systems
001.000.000.237.180.000.00 4,650.68
May-10 School Zone Safety Account
001.000.000.237.200.000.00 599.44
May-10 Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.000.237.250.000.00 2,669.78
May-10 Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.000.237.260.000.00 503.09
Total :39,820.99
119463 6/10/2010 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 683326 APRIL, 2010 LITIGATION INVOICE
April, 2010 Legal Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 13,858.80
APRIL-2010 RETAINER FEES683329
April, 2010 Retainer Fees
001.000.360.515.100.410.00 25,663.33
Total :39,522.13
119464 6/10/2010 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 683329 Legislative Legal Fees for May 2010
Legislative Legal Fees for May 2010
001.000.110.511.100.410.00 4,763.40
Total :4,763.40
119465 6/10/2010 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0054671 WATER
23700 104TH AVE W
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 133.60
WATER/SEWER0060860
23700 104TH AVE W
35Page:
Packet Page 80 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119465 6/10/2010 (Continued)026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 75.48
Total :209.08
119466 6/10/2010 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00056745 Unit 55 - Actuator-Linear
Unit 55 - Actuator-Linear
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 455.17
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 12.11
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 44.39
Total :511.67
119467 6/10/2010 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION AQD535 B/W copy overage fee~
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 4.02
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 4.02
B/W copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 4.02
B/W copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 4.02
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 36.49
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 36.49
Color copy overage fee~
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 36.49
Color copy overage fee~
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 36.47
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 3.85
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.480.00 3.85
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.480.00 3.85
36Page:
Packet Page 81 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119467 6/10/2010 (Continued)066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.480.00 3.84
Total :177.41
119468 6/10/2010 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 966235 TOPSOIL
TOPSOIL LAWN TOPDRESS MIX
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 349.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 33.23
Total :383.03
119469 6/10/2010 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.936003 Fac Maint - Paint Supplies
Fac Maint - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 30.62
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.91
Library - Paint, Supplies936602
Library - Paint, Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 97.22
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.24
Total :139.99
119470 6/10/2010 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP 2010 Establish DayCamp's Petty Cash Fund for
Establish DayCamp's Petty Cash Fund for
001.000.000.111.700.000.00 500.00
Total :500.00
119471 6/10/2010 073267 PASCOE, CYNTHIA PASCOE0528 REFUND
REFUND - CANCELLED DIVE TEAM
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 120.00
Total :120.00
119472 6/10/2010 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK12408 PILATES ENERGY MAT
PILATES ENERGY MAT #12408
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 355.60
37Page:
Packet Page 82 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :355.601194726/10/2010 069944 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH
119473 6/10/2010 073266 PILGRIM MEDIA SERVICES PILGRIM0531 MEMORIAL DAY SOUND SYSTEM
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/PROVIDING SOUND
130.000.640.536.200.410.00 200.00
Total :200.00
119474 6/10/2010 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 184943 INV#184943 ACCT#2772 - EDMONDS PD
SHIPPING RADIOS FOR REPAIR
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 42.04
Total :42.04
119475 6/10/2010 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 184612 WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25
WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST184745
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25
WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST184920
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
38Page:
Packet Page 83 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119475 6/10/2010 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25
WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST185029
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24
Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25
Total :35.88
119476 6/10/2010 070979 PRECISION EARTHWORKS INC E6DA.PMT 9 E6DA.PMT 9 WORK COMPLETED THRU 5/21/10
E6DA.Pmt 9 Work Completed thru 5/21/10
125.000.640.594.750.650.00 234,070.14
Total :234,070.14
119477 6/10/2010 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC
24 hour alarm monitoring MCC
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 50.45
24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL31146525
24 hour alarm monitoring-CH 6/26-7/25/10
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 37.85
Total :88.30
119478 6/10/2010 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ12530 FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP
FELDENKRAIS #12530
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 120.40
Total :120.40
119479 6/10/2010 065579 QUIKSIGN 58386 Saffold/PLN20100018 Sign Installation.
Saffold/PLN20100018 Sign Installation.
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.00
39Page:
Packet Page 84 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119479 6/10/2010 (Continued)065579 QUIKSIGN
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 16.06
WSF/PLN20100024 Sign Installation.58436
WSF/PLN20100024 Sign Installation.
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 169.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.600.410.11 16.06
Total :370.12
119480 6/10/2010 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 108689 MARKER
MARKER: GEPNER
130.000.640.536.200.340.00 316.00
Total :316.00
119481 6/10/2010 072368 R & T HOOD AND DUCT SERVICES 65236 Sr Center - Repiped and corrected
Sr Center - Repiped and corrected
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 555.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 52.73
Total :607.73
119482 6/10/2010 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 61900 INV#61900 - EDMONDS PD
TOWING 1998 FORD ESC 164UXT
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 158.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.410.00 15.01
Total :173.01
119483 6/10/2010 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC 262497 Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing Rental
Meadowdale Storm Drain Crossing Rental
411.000.652.542.900.450.00 99.83
Total :99.83
119484 6/10/2010 071696 RANKINS, KATE RANKINS0604 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 6/4/10
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 40.00
40Page:
Packet Page 85 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :40.001194846/10/2010 071696 071696 RANKINS, KATE
119485 6/10/2010 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 001786 Storm - Sweep dump fees
Storm - Sweep dump fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 1,557.31
Total :1,557.31
119486 6/10/2010 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY 05/27/10 ACCT#70014, ANIMAL CONTROL - EDMONDS PD
#267348 - 8 NPC 5/3/10
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 85.44
#267436 - 5 NPC 5/17/10
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 53.40
Total :138.84
119487 6/10/2010 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC 03-052563 Unit 12 - Gaskets
Unit 12 - Gaskets
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.32
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.55
Unit 12 - Gaskets03-052754
Unit 12 - Gaskets
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.34
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.41
Unit 12 - Gasket03-052789
Unit 12 - Gasket
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 7.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.75
Unit 38 - Water Pump03-052844
Unit 38 - Water Pump
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 52.24
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 4.96
Unit 55 - Battery03-052854
Unit 55 - Battery
41Page:
Packet Page 86 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119487 6/10/2010 (Continued)066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 160.34
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.23
Unit 12 - Gasket03-052857
Unit 12 - Gasket
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.98
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.61
Unit 12 - Rotor, Cap03-053065
Unit 12 - Rotor, Cap
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 14.19
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.35
Fleet -Return Credits05-347673
Fleet -Return Credits
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -42.33
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -4.02
Fleet- Gaskets Returned for Credit05-348390
Fleet- Gaskets Returned for Credit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -28.22
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 -2.68
Total :243.90
119488 6/10/2010 073151 SEATTLE'S CHILD MAGAZINE 2010-9272 ALL CAMPS AD
ALL CAMPS AD
001.000.640.574.200.440.00 135.00
Total :135.00
119489 6/10/2010 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0110140-IN Unit eq63eq
Unit eq63eq
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 272.00
Freight
511.100.657.594.480.640.00 20.50
42Page:
Packet Page 87 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119489 6/10/2010 (Continued)068489 SIRENNET.COM
Unit 413 - Outlets0110264-IN
Unit 413 - Outlets
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 79.00
Freight
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 13.75
Total :385.25
119490 6/10/2010 071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC 52165610 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 3,472.69
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 329.91
BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM52166636
PLANTS FOR BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 234.77
Total :4,037.37
119491 6/10/2010 069734 SMITH, JOEL JSMITH0610 GYMNASTICS SHOW SERVICES
GYMNASTICS SPRING SHOW: RUNNING MUSIC &
001.000.640.575.550.410.00 90.00
Total :90.00
119492 6/10/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-2646-0 1000 EDMONDS ST
1000 EDMONDS ST
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.04
610 PINE ST2013-2711-1
610 PINE ST
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.23
750 15TH ST SW2015-5730-3
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 202.12
750 15TH ST SW2016-1027-6
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 15.37
415 5TH AVE S2017-6210-1
43Page:
Packet Page 88 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119492 6/10/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
415 5TH AVE S
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 106.24
750 15TH ST SW2021-6153-5
750 15TH ST SW
130.000.640.536.500.470.00 111.17
930 9TH AVE N2022-5063-5
930 9TH AVE N
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.04
Total :527.21
119493 6/10/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-4823-3 22000 84TH AVE W
Traffic Signal 220th St SW & 84th Ave W
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 0.54
STREET LIGHTING (150 WATTS = 183 LIGHTS201711785
Street Lighting (150 Watts = 183 lights
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 1,406.33
MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (250WATTS:58 LITES)202579488
MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (250WATTS:58 LITES)
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 596.97
Total :2,003.84
119494 6/10/2010 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER May, 2010 May-2010 Crime Victims Court Remittance
May-2010 Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.000.237.140.000.00 823.77
Total :823.77
119495 6/10/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587/0610 DUMP FEES
PARK MAINTENANCE DUMP FEES
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 771.37
Total :771.37
119496 6/10/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS
garbage & recycle for PS
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 550.74
garbage & recycle for FAC03585
garbage & recycle for FAC
44Page:
Packet Page 89 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119496 6/10/2010 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47
garbage & recycle for Library03586
garbage & recycle for Library
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23
garbage & recycle-City Hall03588
garbage & recycle-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 484.51
Total :2,264.95
119497 6/10/2010 065929 SPEEWEST CONSTRUCTION E9HA.Retainage E9HA.CLAY FEEDER RETAINAGE RELEASE
E9HA.RETAINAGE RELEASE
412.300.000.223.400.000.00 2,450.00
Total :2,450.00
119498 6/10/2010 069997 SRI TECHNOLOGIES INC 103666 E6DA.ROBERTS THRU 4/17/10
E6DA.Roberts thru 4/17/10
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 2,398.80
E6DA.ROBERTS THRU 5/15/10104530
E6DA.Roberts thru 5/15/10
125.000.640.594.750.410.00 982.10
Total :3,380.90
119499 6/10/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2203691 PW - Elect Supplies
PW - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 112.60
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 10.70
Total :123.30
119500 6/10/2010 072562 STUDIO3MUSIC LLC STUDIOMUSIC12558 KINDERMUSIK CLASSES
KINDERMUSIK #12558
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 483.00
KINDERMUSIK #12552
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 478.80
KINDERMUSIK #12557
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 462.00
45Page:
Packet Page 90 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,423.801195006/10/2010 072562 072562 STUDIO3MUSIC LLC
119501 6/10/2010 073143 SYNGENTA SEEDS INC 5000837988 CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
PLANTS FOR CITY WIDE BEAUTIFICATION
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 519.42
Freight
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 183.50
BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM5000838663
BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 534.63
Freight
125.000.640.576.800.310.00 207.09
Total :1,444.64
119502 6/10/2010 071174 TASER INTERNATIONAL SI1208662 INV#SI1208662 CUST#116409 - EDMONDS PD
TASER X26 KIT #T10510-030XE
001.000.410.521.220.350.00 809.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.350.00 76.95
Total :886.90
119503 6/10/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 05312010 NEWSPAPER ADS
Council & Plan Brd Agendas
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,874.51
NEWSPAPER AD1696926
Hearing: Title 19
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 55.72
NEWSPAPER AD1696927
Hearing: Renew Ord 3780
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 57.40
NEWSPAPER AD1696928
Hearing: Renew Ord 3779
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 57.40
NEWSPAPER AD1697068
Council Vacancy
001.000.250.514.300.440.00 49.00
46Page:
Packet Page 91 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :2,094.031195036/10/2010 009350 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
119504 6/10/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1696331 City/Sepa Update legal notice.
City/Sepa Update legal notice.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 57.40
PLN20100034 Legal Notice.1697341
PLN20100034 Legal Notice.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 99.40
AMD20100018 Legal Notice.1697525
AMD20100018 Legal Notice.
001.000.620.558.600.440.00 82.60
Total :239.40
119505 6/10/2010 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 523157 MUSEUM
monthly elevator maint-museum
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 188.02
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 17.86
MONITORING-PS523158
Monitoring-PS 6/1-6/30/10
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 41.90
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR531338
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 154.98
9.2% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.71
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING531339
SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
001.000.651.519.920.480.00 12.61
Total :430.08
119506 6/10/2010 073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC PSV641254 Fac Maint - Filters for the City
Fac Maint - Filters for the City
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 905.01
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 85.98
47Page:
Packet Page 92 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :990.991195066/10/2010 073255 073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC
119507 6/10/2010 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC May2010-Edmonds Hearing Examiner fees for May 2010
Hearing Examiner fees for May 2010
001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,600.00
Total :3,600.00
119508 6/10/2010 063939 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 29437 Fund Programing
Fund Programing
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 300.00
Total :300.00
119509 6/10/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8483582 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 48.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.57
Total :52.73
119510 6/10/2010 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0311575 WA Drug testing services
Drug testing services
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 53.00
Total :53.00
119511 6/10/2010 073272 USDA APHIS WS TF 8310005 Lake Ballinger Water Quality Project:~
Lake Ballinger Water Quality Project:~
411.000.652.542.900.510.00 2,048.00
Total :2,048.00
119512 6/10/2010 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE 282 MEN'S TEAM REGISTRATION
MEN'S TEAM REGISTRATION (WRECKING CREW)
001.000.640.575.520.490.00 35.00
Total :35.00
119513 6/10/2010 065269 VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC 2201390071 Unit 304 - Repairs
Unit 304 - Repairs
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 1,136.86
48Page:
Packet Page 93 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119513 6/10/2010 (Continued)065269 VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC
8.2% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.480.00 93.22
Total :1,230.08
119514 6/10/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-712-0647 IRRIGATION SYSTEM
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 41.10
Total :41.10
119515 6/10/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-640-8169 PT EDWARDS SEWER PUMP STATION MONITOR
Phone line for Sewer Lift Station at Pt
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 36.36
WATER - 8505 BOWDOIN425-672-6030
LS
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 64.38
LIFT ST 7425-775-2069
Lift St 7
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 54.79
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 110.24
1ST & PINE CIRCUIT LINE PT EDWARDS425-AB9-0530
1st & Pine Circuit Line for Pt Edwards
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 40.75
Total :306.52
119516 6/10/2010 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I10008970 INV#I10008970 EDM301
BACKGROUND CHECKS 05/2010
001.000.000.237.100.000.00 173.25
Total :173.25
119517 6/10/2010 073268 WATSON, KATHERINE WATSON0527 REFUND
REFUND DUE TO INSTRUCTOR CONFLICT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 16.00
Total :16.00
49Page:
Packet Page 94 of 304
06/10/2010
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
2:26:57PM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
119518 6/10/2010 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 485 UMPIRING
MEN'S AND CO-ED UMPIRING
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 3,168.00
Total :3,168.00
Bank total :836,348.05164 Vouchers for bank code :front
836,348.05Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report164
50Page:
Packet Page 95 of 304
AM-3135 2.E.
Claim for Damages
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Abbie White, Willow Crest Condominium
Association ($80.00).
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute
entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
A Claim for Damages was submitted by:
Abbie White, Treasurer
Willow Crest Condominium Association
7901 - 212th St. SW, #1
Edmonds, WA 98026
($80.00)
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: White Claim for Damages
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 05:14 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/08/2010 05:34 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 01:00 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/08/2010 05:12
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/09/2010
Packet Page 96 of 304
Packet Page 97 of 304
Packet Page 98 of 304
Packet Page 99 of 304
AM-3137 2.F.
WSLCB List - May
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Linda Carl
Submitted For:Gary Haakenson Time:Consent
Department:Mayor's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Acceptance of list of businesses applying for renewal of their liquor licenses with the Washington
State Liquor Control Board, May 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The City Clerk’s Office, the Police department, and the Mayor’s Office have reviewed the
attached list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the
liquor licenses for the listed businesses.
For your information: Urbanabox, Inc. does not have a current business license with the City. A
reminder letter has been sent.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: List
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 11:38 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/09/2010 01:33 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 09:15 AM APRV
Form Started By: Linda
Carl
Started On: 06/09/2010 10:18
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 100 of 304
Packet Page 101 of 304
AM-3104 2.G.
Surplus a City Police Vehicle
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Kim Karas
Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:Consent
Department:Public Works Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Authorization to contract with "Pull-a-Part" Company and surplus Unit # 234, a City police
vehicle, totaled in an accident.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It's recommended that Council authorize staff to contract with "Pull-a-Part" Company and surplus
Unit # 234, a City police vehicle totaled in an accident.
Previous Council Action
Previously, City Council has authorized the sale or auction of surplus City vehicles and equipment
to salvage companies.
Narrative
The following vehicle was involved in an accident on 8/15/2008 that resulted in the vehicle being
totaled. The City Fleet shop has stripped the vehicle of all usable parts and would like to sell the
vehicle shell as scrap to "Pull-a-Part" company.
Unit #234-POL 2004 Ford Crown Victoria VIN # 2FAHP71W34X173034
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 11:15 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/08/2010 11:26 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 05:15 PM APRV
Form Started By: Kim
Karas
Started On: 05/26/2010 11:36
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/08/2010
Packet Page 102 of 304
AM-3138 2.H.
Shell Valley Emergency Access Project Consultant Addendum
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Megan Cruz
Submitted For:Robert English Time:Consent
Department:Engineering Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign Addendum No. 3 to the professional services agreement with
Perteet, Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access project.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Authorize the Mayor to sign Addendum No. 3 to the professional services agreement with Perteet,
Inc. for the Shell Valley Emergency Access project.
Previous Council Action
On October 16, 2007, Council approved the professional services agreement with Perteet, Inc. for
the Shell Valley Emergency Access project.
On February 19, 2008 Council authorized the Mayor to sign Addendum No. 1 to the professional
services agreement.
Narrative
The state legislature approved $250,000 in funding for the Shell Valley Emergency Access project
as part of the 2010 Transportation Budget. The project will provide an emergency access route to
the Shell Valley area since the current access (Pioneer Way) is very steep and can become
impassable during periods of ice and snow. Emergency responders and the public will be able to
use this new route during times when Pioneer Way is closed due to ice and snow. The
improvements will also serve as a recreational path to improve pedestrian access between Pine
Ridge and Yost parks.
The engineering firm of Perteet, Inc was hired in 2007 to complete the design plans for the new
access road. The scope of services for the professional services agreement assumed construction
would begin in 2008. However, the project was placed on hold in 2009 due to a shortfall in
funding.
The scope of services for Addendum No. 3 includes updating and completing the required
environmental permits and documentation, preparing final contract specifications and cost
estimate and revising the final plan set. Because prior design efforts were based on regulations in
effect at the time they were produced, previously completed environmental and permitting
Packet Page 103 of 304
documentation must be reviewed and updated to reflect current requirements before submission to
the regulatory authorities.
The construction costs and the additional services in Addendum No. 3 ($23,178) will be funded by
the State Grant and the combined 412 Utility Fund. Permitting is scheduled to occur during fall
and winter of 2010-11 and construction is scheduled for spring/summer 2011.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Addendum No. 3
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 Engineering Robert English 06/10/2010 12:40 PM APRV
2 Public Works Noel Miller 06/10/2010 01:22 PM APRV
3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 01:48 PM APRV
4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Megan
Cruz
Started On: 06/09/2010 11:27
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 104 of 304
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
0
5
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
0
6
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
0
7
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
0
8
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
0
9
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
1
0
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
1
1
o
f
3
0
4
P
a
c
k
e
t
P
a
g
e
1
1
2
o
f
3
0
4
AM-3149 2.I.
Revision to City's Water Leakage Adjustment Policy
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Lorenzo Hines Time:Consent
Department:Finance Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Revision to City's Water Leakage Policy.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve
Previous Council Action
Previous policy was adopted in May, 1986
Narrative
The current City policy was adopted in May, 1986. This revision continues the overall policy,
however it clarifies and narrows the qualification and disposition of the adjustments.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Revised City Leakage Policy
Link: Current Leakage Policy
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:05 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Lorenzo
Hines
Started On: 06/10/2010 03:54
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 113 of 304
City of Edmonds Finance and Information Systems
CITY OF EDMONDS
LEAKAGE ADJUSTMENT POLICY
(Revised 05/2010)
1. To qualify for a leakage adjustment the:
a) Customer must satisfactorily demonstrate a leakage was undetected and caused by
unusual circumstances beyond the customer's control; and
b) Must take action to repair a leakage within thirty 30 days of when the customer
discovers or is notified of a leakage; and
c) Complete and submit a City application form within 30 days of the repair
accompanied by a copy of the finalized water service line permit to the City
Finance Department, Edmonds City Hall, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA
98020. If the repair is exempt from permit, per Edmonds Community
Development Code Chapter 19.20, then only proof of repair is required.
2. Only one leakage adjustment will be granted in any three year period; and will be
limited to the equivalent of three billing cycles. Adjustments will not be granted for
internal (within the residential or commercial structure) plumbing leakages.
3. Adjustments exceeding $500 require approval by the Finance Director.
4. A leakage adjustment credit shall be determined as follows:
a. The average consumption for the same period during the previous three years,
charged at the City’s retail rate, plus the excess water loss from the leakage
charged at the City’s wholesale rate. An additional 15% administrative cost is
applied to the excess loss only.
b. If the adjustment is for a commercial account that is billed for sewer service
based on water consumption, the City will also adjust the sewer portion based
on the same calculations less administrative costs.
Lorenzo Hines Jr., Director, Finance and Administrative Services
CITY OF EDMONDS
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY HALL FIRST FLOOR MAYOR
EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425)771-0240 FAX (425)771-0265 LORENZO HINES JR.
DIRECTOR
FINANCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT
Packet Page 114 of 304
Packet Page 115 of 304
AM-3140 2.J.
Proposed Interlocal Agreement with Lynnwood for Video Court Hearings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Doug Fair Time:Consent
Department:Municipal Court Type:Action
Review Committee:Public Safety , Finance
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Proposed interlocal agreement with Lynnwood for video court hearings.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Unanimously approved for the consent agenda by Finance and Public Safety Committees on
6/8/10. Councilmember Wilson did express concern about potential liability issues. The
interlocal does contain a liability and indemnification section (#9).
Narrative
Recently, the City of Edmonds started using video equipment to conduct in custody hearings for
defendants detained at the county jail. Though the program is relatively new, the program appears
to be successful in reducing jail costs and increasing public safety. Lynnwood has requested that
we approve an interlocal agreement that allows their video hearings from the county jail to be
conducted through our system. The proposed agreement has been attached to this agenda memo.
While Lynnwood does have its own jail, a number of their defendants are detained at the county
jail. There is a substantial cost in bringing down those defendants to their jail to be heard on their
cases. There is also a fairly big start-up cost for the video equipment (approx. $12,000-$15,000).
As you may recall, we paid for our system entirely out of court improvement funds provided by
the State. Lynnwood would like to take advantage of our existing system to defray those costs.
In these times of lean government budgets, it makes sense to combine services when it is
economically feasible. The proposed interlocal is designed to be revenue neutral. The City of
Lynnwood will staff the hearings with their own clerks, pay for attorney fees associated with the
proposal, be directly billed for the judicial and pro tem time, pay any increase in security costs,
and pay a small annual fee to cover increased depreciation of assets and use of materials.
We have the time, the facility and the equipment in place. We would simply add the Lynnwood in
custody calendars directly after our calendars. These calendars take place Monday afternoons and
Thursday mornings. There are no schedule conflicts with the court/council chambers during these
times.
This appears to be a win/win situation. This item was approved for the consent agenda by Finance
and Public Safety Committees on 6/8/10.
Packet Page 116 of 304
and Public Safety Committees on 6/8/10.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2010
Revenue:
Expenditure:
Fiscal Impact:
The interlocal is designed to have a net revenue/expenditure impact of zero. Lynnwood will
provide its own staff for the video hearings. Lynnwood will reimburse Edmonds for attorney fees
associated with the review and approval of the interlocal. Any increase in costs for court security
will be paid for by Lynnwood. Judge and pro tem time will be billed to the City of Lynnwood.
Lynnwood will pay a small annual fee for the increase in use of the equipment (approx. $750).
This should cover the increase in depreciation of the assets and the nominal amount of paper and
ink used in the fax machine.
Attachments
Link: video interlocal
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 02:49 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Doug
Fair
Started On: 06/09/2010 01:04
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 117 of 304
396016.02|360099|0005 -1-
AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN 1
THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS 2
RELATING TO LYNNWOOD’S USE OF THE EDMONDS 3
MUNICIPAL COURT FOR VIDEO HEARINGS 4
5
6
This AGREEMENT between the City of Lynnwood, a Washington municipal 7
corporation (“Lynnwood”), and the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal 8
corporation (“Edmonds”) (collectively the “Cities” or the “Parties”), is dated this ____ 9
day of , 2010. 10
11
Whereas, Lynnwood operates a municipal court established pursuant to Chapter 12
3.50 RCW; 13
14
Whereas, Edmonds maintains courtroom facilities which Edmonds is willing to 15
make available for Lynnwood’s use to conduct video hearings on criminal matters 16
pending in Lynnwood’s municipal court; 17
18
Whereas, Lynnwood’s use of the Edmonds’ municipal court will provide 19
Lynnwood with additional case capacity and will help reduce costs and security issues 20
relating to the transportation of defendants between the Lynnwood municipal court and 21
the Snohomish County Jail; 22
23
Whereas, the Cities desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to set for the terms 24
and conditions relating to Lynnwood’s use of Edmonds’ municipal court facilities; and 25
26
Whereas, this interlocal agreement has been entered into by the Parties pursuant 27
to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW; 28
29
Now, therefore, Lynnwood and Edmonds have entered into this interlocal 30
agreement in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived under the Agreement. 31
32
AGREEMENT 33
34
Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for Lynnwood’s use of 35
Edmonds’ municipal court facilities located at 250 5th
42
Avenue No., Edmonds, 36
Washington (referred to herein as the “Court Facilities”) in order to hold video hearings 37
of criminal matters pending in Lynnwood’s municipal court. It is the intent of the Parties 38
that Lynnwood’s matters will be heard immediately following the conclusion of 39
Edmonds’ criminal matters. The anticipated schedule for Lynnwood’s use of the Court 40
Facilities will be as follows: . 41
Section 2. Appointment of Judge Pro Tems. In order to facilitate Lynnwood’s use of the 43
Court Facilities, pursuant to RCW 3.50.090 the Presiding Judge of the Lynnwood 44
municipal court will appoint all Edmonds municipal court judges as Judge Pro Tems of 45
the Lynnwood municipal court so that they may lawfully preside over Lynnwood matters 46
Packet Page 118 of 304
396016.02|360099|0005 -2-
at the Court Facilities as may be necessary for the efficient handling of Lynnwood’s 47
criminal matters. The appointment process shall be in accordance with all of the 48
requirements of RCW 3.50.090. Lynnwood and Edmonds agree that Judge Douglas J. 49
Fair will serve as the primary Judge Pro Tem to hear Lynnwood matters. In the event 50
Judge Fair is unavailable to hear Lynnwood matters, another Judge Pro Tem will preside 51
over Lynnwood’s matters. 52
53
Section 3. Payment Responsibility for Lynnwood Judge Pro Tems
63
. Judge Pro Tems 54
appointed to hear Lynnwood matters shall each individually invoice Lynnwood for the 55
actual time spent preparing for and hearing Lynnwood matters. Invoices shall be 56
provided to the City on a monthly basis. The hourly rates for the Judge Pro Tems 57
approved under this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and 58
incorporated herein by this reference. These rates may be reviewed on an annual basis. 59
Any amendments to the rates shall be made by written agreement of the Parties. Invoices 60
shall be in a form and contain information required by the Lynnwood Municipal Court. 61
Lynnwood shall pay undisputed invoices within thirty (30) days after receipt. 62
Section 4. Cost Reimbursement for Court Facilities
75
. In consideration of Lynnwood’s use 64
of Edmonds’ Court Facilities, Lynnwood agrees to pay the amount of _______________ 65
and No/100 Dollars ($________) per year which the Parties agree is a fair and reasonable 66
share of the long term replacement costs of furniture, fixtures and equipment that will be 67
used by Lynnwood under the terms of this Agreement. Payment of this amount shall be 68
made by Lynnwood on ___________________________________ of each year during 69
the term of this Agreement. In addition, Lynnwood agrees to reimburse Edmonds for the 70
reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by Edmonds in the review and approval of this 71
Agreement. Edmonds shall provide Lynnwood with an invoice requesting 72
reimbursement of its attorney’s fees. Except as otherwise provided herein, no other 73
payments shall be required for Lynnwood’s use of the Court Facilities. 74
Section 5. Court Staffing and Security
77
. 76
a. Lynnwood will be responsible for providing its own court administrative 78
personnel to staff the Lynnwood calendar at the Court Facilities. Personnel provided by 79
Lynnwood shall be employees of Lynnwood and all wages, benefits and costs of such 80
employees will be borne by Lynnwood. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted 81
to create any employment relationship or status between Edmonds and the Lynnwood 82
court personnel. 83
84
b. Lynnwood will be responsible for covering a fair share of the cost of the court 85
bailiff and any security officers that may be utilized during Lynnwood’s use of the Court 86
Facilities. The specific costs associated with the use of the court bailiff and security 87
officers will be the subject of future negotiations between Lynnwood and Snohomish 88
County and Lynnwood and Edmonds and will be set forth in separate agreements. The 89
Parties acknowledge that Snohomish County and Edmonds will bill Lynnwood directly 90
for any costs associated with the use of the court bailiff and security officers and that 91
Packet Page 119 of 304
396016.02|360099|0005 -3-
Lynnwood will make its payments directly to Snohomish County or Edmonds, as 92
applicable. 93
94
Section 6. Approval by Lynnwood Prosecuting Attorney and Public Defender
99
. The 95
Cities understand and acknowledge that this Agreement is conditioned on the approval of 96
the Lynnwood prosecuting attorney and the public defender to hold hearings at the 97
Edmonds Municipal Court. 98
Section 7. Governing Law and Venue
106
. This Agreement shall be interpreted and 100
construed according to the laws of the State of Washington. The headings of sections of 101
this Agreement are for convenience or reference only and are not intended to restrict, 102
affect or be of any weight in the interpretation or construction of the provisions of such 103
sections. Any judicial action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in Snohomish 104
County, Washington. 105
Section 8. Notice
110
. Any notice to be given, or document to be delivered by either party to 107
the other, shall be delivered in person, or by fax or electronic transmission followed by 108
regular first class mail, addressed to Lynnwood or Edmonds at the following addresses: 109
Lynnwood: Attn: Finance Director 111
City of Lynnwood 112
19100 44th
Lynnwood, WA 98036 114
Ave W. 113
115
Edmonds: Attn: City Clerk 116
City of Edmonds 117
121 5th
Edmonds, WA 98020 119
Avenue No. 118
120
Either party may, by written notice to the other, designate a different address or designee. 121
122
Section 9. Liability and Indemnification
129
. Each party shall be solely responsible for the 123
acts or failure to act of its employees occurring during or arising in any way out of the 124
performance of this Agreement, and shall release, defend and indemnify the other party, 125
its officers and employees, with respect to all claims, losses, expenses and damages 126
incurred as a result of the party’s acts or omissions related to the performance of this 127
Agreement. 128
Section 10. Term and Termination
133
. This Agreement shall take effect on the last date 130
approved by both Parties and shall remain in effect indefinitely. This Agreement may be 131
terminated by either party upon __________ (____) days’ written notice. 132
Section 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between 134
the Parties, and shall supersede, modify, and/or rescind all prior written or oral 135
understandings and agreements between the Parties. This Agreement may be amended 136
only by written agreement signed by the parties. If any provision or any portion thereof 137
Packet Page 120 of 304
396016.02|360099|0005 -4-
in this Agreement is held to be unlawful, invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall 138
be severable from this Agreement and the remainder of this Agreement shall continue 139
and remain in full force and effect. 140
141
Section 12. Interlocal Agreement Requirements
145
. Pursuant to RCW 39.34.040, 142
Lynnwood shall record this Agreement with the Snohomish County Auditor after 143
execution, or alternatively, shall list the Agreement by subject on its website. 144
146
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement, effective on the latest 147
date indicated below. 148
149
CITY OF LYNNWOOD CITY OF EDMONDS 150
151
152
By By 153
Don Gough, Mayor Gary Haakenson, Mayor 154
155
156
Date Date 157
158
159
ATTEST: ATTEST: 160
161
162
_____________________________ _____________________________ 163
Patrick L. Dugan, Interim Finance Director Sandra S. Chase, Edmonds City 164
Clerk 165
166
Approved as to form: Approved as to form: 167
168
Office of the City Attorney Office of the City Attorney 169
170
171
______________________________ _____________________________ 172
Eric Frimodt W. Scott Snyder 173
Attorney for the City of Lynnwood Attorney for the City of Edmonds 174
Packet Page 121 of 304
AM-3115 2.K.
Ordinance Amending Cemetery Funds to Clarify Use of Funds
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Brian McIntosh Time:Consent
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Action
Review Committee:Finance
Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda
Information
Subject Title
Ordinance of the City of Edmonds, Washington, amending the provisions of Chapter 10.16,
Cemetery Board, Section 10.16.050 "Funds for Improvement and Maintenance of the Cemetery" to
clarify the use of funds contained therein, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Adopt proposed amendments.
Previous Council Action
At the Finance Committee meeting of March 9, 2010, the Finance Committee recommended that
the amendments containing the clarifying language be placed on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
The Cemetery Improvement Fund 130 retains 90% of the revenue it receives from sales and
services. This fund is used for special projects and capital improvements, special events, and daily
recurring maintenance and operations. The code however states that this fund shall be used for
"nonrecurring needs of the cemetery".
The Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 610 receives the other 10% of cemetery revenue. The goal
of this fund shall be to "actuarially fund the trust fund so that it may become and remain a
self-sufficient source of funding for all recurring maintenance of the cemetery". Like most other
cemeteries the intent of this fund is to use only the interest earnings for maintenance and
operations should the Cemetery's regular operating funds become insufficient, i.e. when all
cemetery lots are sold and cemetery income is subsequently diminished.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Cemetery Ordinance with amendments
Link: Council minutes adopting ord. 2596 & 2827
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 11:15 AM APRV
Packet Page 122 of 304
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/08/2010 11:26 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/08/2010 05:15 PM APRV
Form Started By: Brian
McIntosh
Started On: 06/02/2010 10:50
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/08/2010
Packet Page 123 of 304
{WSS788899.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/14/10
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
CHAPTER 10.16 CEMETERY BOARD, SECTION 10.16.050
FUNDS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE
CEMETERY
TO CLARIFY THE USE OF FUNDS CONTAINED
THEREIN, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the Cemetery Board has requested that the City Council amend the
provisions of ECDC 10.16.050 to more appropriately reflect the use of funds held by the
cemetery and to clarify that the cemetery improvement fund may be use for current annual
maintenance so long as the cemetery maintenance trust fund is fully funded and adequate to
provide for future funding of maintenance of the cemetery; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes such amendment to be in the public
interest so long as the cemetery maintenance trust fund is actuarially sufficient to provide for
maintenance of the cemetery when current operating funds are unavailable due to the sale of all
available lots and spaces within the cemetery, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. ECDC 10.16.050 Funds for Improvement and Maintenance of the
Cemetery
10.16.050 Funds for improvement and maintenance of the
cemetery.
is hereby amended to read as follows:
Packet Page 124 of 304
{WSS788899.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
A. There are hereby created two special funds of the city to be
known as the cemetery improvement fund and the cemetery
maintenance trust fund. The city council shall, each year as a part
of the budget process, allocate revenue from lot sales, burial fees,
and all bequests, gifts and donations received with respect to the
cemetery on a percentage basis to said funds.
1. The cemetery improvement and annual maintenance fund
shall be used for special projects, special events, capital
improvements and other recurring and non-recurring needs of the
cemetery. Expenditures of this fund may be made both from
principal and income and the entire amount of such fund may be
expended in any year when such expenditures are within the
annual budget approved by the city council.
2. The cemetery maintenance trust fund shall be held in trust
for future expenditure solely for the purpose of maintaining the
cemetery and any capital improvements or facilities located therein
through in the foreseeable future. Expenditures from this fund
shall be limited to the income earned by said funds along with any
additional funds appropriated to this fund by the council or donated
by any party for the purpose of annual maintenance. To the extent
permitted by law, the city council hereby impresses the current
fund balance of this fund, as well as any private donations made in
trust in favor of the estate of any person buried therein and by the
descendents of such persons, along with the Hubbard Family
Foundation and any other persons or entities donating funds to the
cemetery maintenance trust fund for the sole purpose of
maintenance of the cemetery and its capital improvements.
3. The city council shall consider the number of unsold lots,
the future market value of unsold lots, and the probable earnings of
the trust fund when fully funded by the sale of all lots when
allocating revenue. The goal shall be to actuarially fund the
cemetery and maintenance fund with sufficient monies so that it
may become and remain a self sufficient source of funding for all
recurring maintenance of the cemetery.
B. Any monies in said funds, surplus and available for
investment, shall be managed in accordance with RCW 68.12.060.
This section shall be considered approval of investments in
accordance with RCW 68.12.065 subject to the annual review of
the city council in the budget process. All investments shall be
reviewed and approved by the finance director.
Packet Page 125 of 304
{WSS788899.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 -
C. Monies shall be paid out of said funds only upon warrants
drawn by the cemetery board and approved in the manner set forth
in Chapter 2.25 ECC. All warrants shall be endorsed by the mayor
and attested by the city finance director. In no event shall any
monies be expended from the cemetery maintenance trust fund in
excess of the annual income earned nor shall any money be
diverted from such trust fund to any purpose other than provided in
this chapter. To the extent permitted by law, the council hereby
prohibits itself and future councils from diverting funds for the
cemetery maintenance trust fund, while reserving its right to
budget monies to or approve expenditures from the cemetery
maintenance trust funding future budget years as it, in its sole
discretion, shall deem appropriate in order to actuarially provide
for the establishment of a fund which will generate sufficient
income to meet the future foreseeable maintenance needs of the
cemetery. Expenditures of monies from the cemetery
improvement fund and the cemetery maintenance trust fund shall
be provided for in the annual budget by the council subject to the
recommendation of the cemetery board.
Section 2. Effective Date
APPROVED:
. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
Packet Page 126 of 304
{WSS788899.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 4 -
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 127 of 304
{WSS788899.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 5 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 10.16 CEMETERY BOARD, SECTION 10.16.050 FUNDS FOR
IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE CEMETERY TO CLARIFY THE USE OF
FUNDS CONTAINED THEREIN, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 128 of 304
Packet Page 129 of 304
Packet Page 130 of 304
Packet Page 131 of 304
Packet Page 132 of 304
AM-3121 3.
National Wildlife Federation/Community Wildlife Habitat City Award
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Councilman Strom Peterson Time:10 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Presentation of National Wildlife Federation/Community Wildlife Habitat City Award.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Presentation of National Wildlife Federation/Community Wildlife Habitat City Award.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 11:21 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/09/2010 01:32 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 09:15 AM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 06/03/2010 09:01
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 133 of 304
AM-3142 4.
Decision Regarding the Mayor Replacement Procedure
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:Council President Bernheim Time:20 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Decision regarding the Mayor replacement procedure.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
ECC 1.02.035 (copy attached) sets out the procedure the Council must follow when fillng a City
Council vacancy. There is no ordinance setting out any procedure the Council must follow when
choosing a person to fill a mayoral vacancy.
Attached are copies of a draft Mayor selection procedure based on the existing City Council
replacement procedure. Using this procedure, mayoral applications could be received by July 16,
interviews held July 20, and an appointment made July 27.
Also attached for your information are copies of the following:
•06-02-10 City Attorney Memorandum regarding the vacancy in the Office of the Mayor.
•RCW 35A.12.050 - Vacancies.
•RCW 42.12.070 - Filling nonpartisan vacancies.
•06-10-10 DJ Wilson Memo regarding transition to new Mayor.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: ECC 1.02.035 Filling Vacant Council Position
Link: Exhibit 2: Mayor Vacancy Notice
Link: Exhibit 3: Application for Appointment - Mayor
Link: Exhibit 4: 06-02-10 City Attorney Memo re Mayor Vacancy
Link: Exhibit 5: RCW 35A.12.050 Vacancies
Packet Page 134 of 304
Link: Exhibit 6: RCW 42.12.070 - Filling Nonpartisan Vacancies
Link: Exhibit 7: DJ Wilson Memo re: Transition to New Mayor
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 02:49 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:47 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/10/2010 09:41
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 135 of 304
Edmonds City Code
1.02.035 Filling vacant council positions.
A. In the event a vacancy or vacancies shall occur on the city council, such position(s)
shall be filled until a successor to such position(s) can be elected for the remainder of the
unexpired term(s) at the next municipal election. Such election process shall comply with
the requirements of RCW 35A.12.050 and Chapter 42.12 RCW. In addition the city
council shall establish a process commensurate with the time available which includes, at
a minimum, public notification by posting and publication in the city's legal newspaper,
the establishment of an application process with a clearly stated deadline for the
submission of letters of interest, the development of questionnaires to assist the city
council in its process, a public interview process conducted by the city council and
nominations and selection by the city council during an open public meeting. All portions
of this process shall be open to the public unless the city council in its discretion elects to
discuss the qualifications of a candidate for public office in executive session as provided
for by RCW 42.30.110(h).
B. In the event that a council member shall resign or otherwise become ineligible to hold
office after the date when the council position has been filled by election but prior to the
date on which the newly elected council member is eligible to take office, the city council
may in its sole discretion elect to dispense with the procedures established in subsection
A of this section and appoint the newly elected successor to fill the vacancy for the
remainder of the unexpired term. [Ord. 3382 § 1, 2001; Ord. 3005 § 1, 1995; Ord. 1841 §
2, 1976].
Packet Page 136 of 304
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
NOTICE
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR – VACANCY
The City Council of the City of Edmonds is accepting applications from qualified Edmonds’
residents to be considered for appointment to fill a vacancy for the position of Mayor of the City
of Edmonds.
The City of Edmonds is a Mayor/Council form of government. The Mayor serves as the Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer, and Administrative Officer of the City. The Mayor is
responsible for the day-to-day business of the City, administrative oversight of all City
departments, and supervision over all municipal employees either directly or through
subordinate Directors.
Application for Appointment forms are available in the Office of the City Clerk, 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020.
The deadline for submitting Applications for Appointment is no later than 4:30 p.m. on
July 16, 2010, at the City Clerk’s Office located at City Hall, First Floor, 121 5th Avenue North,
Edmonds, Washington.
Interviews of the candidates are scheduled on Tuesday, July 20, 2010.
The City Council will consider nominations at the regular City Council meeting on
Tuesday, July 27, 2010. Only those persons who have submitted applications, or have had
submitted applications on their behalf, shall be eligible for nomination to fill said vacancy.
For additional information, please call the Edmonds City Clerk at (425) 771-0245 or 775-2525.
*******************************
Copies provided to:
Newspapers
The Herald
The Enterprise
The Edmonds Beacon
The Seattle Times
Radio Stations
KCIS/KCMS
KSER
KRKO
KIRO
Television Stations
KING
KOMO
KIRO
Posted:
Edmonds Library
Edmonds Post Office
Edmonds Public Safety Complex
Edmonds City Hall
Packet Page 137 of 304
PLEASE COMPLETE THE ENTIRE APPLICATION FORM. Applicants may attach a cover letter
and/or a resume in addition to completing the entire application form.
RETURN BY 4:30 P.M., JULY 16, 2010, TO:
CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
City Hall, First Floor
121 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds, Washington 98020
For Information - Call (425) 771-0245 or 775-2525
DATE:____________________________
NAME:_____________________________________________________________________________
(Last) (First) (Middle Initial)
STREET ADDRESS:__________________________________________________________________
CITY:_______________________________________ STATE _____________ ZIP ______________
TELEPHONE: (HOME)________________ (WORK) ________________ (CELL) ________________
E-MAIL ADDRESS: _______________ ___________________________________________________
YEARS EDMONDS RESIDENT:________________ REGISTERED VOTER ______Yes ______No
PRESENT EMPLOYER:_______________________________________________________________
HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY SERVED AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL OR HAVE EXPERIENCE AS
AN APPOINTED OFFICIAL, INCLUDING PUBLIC BOARDS, COMMITTEES, COMMISSION OR
TASK FORCES? (If Yes, Please Explain)
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT - MAYOR
Packet Page 138 of 304
Page 2
CAN ATTEND EVENING MEETINGS? ____YES ____NO
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WITHIN THE SPACE
PROVIDED:
1. Why do you wish to hold the position of Mayor?
2. What types of contributions can you make to the City?
Packet Page 139 of 304
Page 3
3. What, if any, do you see are the City's prominent problem areas and what are your
recommended solutions?
4. Do you have the time to fulfill the responsibilities of this position?
Packet Page 140 of 304
Page 4
5. What do you see as the City's role in the community's future?
6. What has been your involvement in the community?
Packet Page 141 of 304
Page 5
7. Would you campaign for election in the next full election?
__________________________________________ ________________________
Signature Date
State of Washington
County of __________________________
Signed or attested before me on ___________________, 2010 by _______________________________
_____________________________________
(Signature of Notary)
_____________________________________
(Print Name)
NOTARY PUBLIC
My appointment expires: _________________
Packet Page 142 of 304
Packet Page 143 of 304
35A.12.050. Vacancies
The office of a mayor or councilmember shall become vacant if the person who is elected or
appointed to that position fails to qualify as provided by law, fails to enter upon the duties of that
office at the time fixed by law without a justifiable reason, or as provided in RCW 35A.12.060 or
42.12.010. A vacancy in the office of mayor or in the council shall be filled as provided in
chapter 42.12 RCW. An incumbent councilmember is eligible to be appointed to fill a vacancy in
the office of mayor.
Packet Page 144 of 304
Packet Page 145 of 304
Packet Page 146 of 304
Memo
Date: June10,2010
To: CouncilPresidentBernheim
From: CouncilmanDJWilson
Cc: CityCouncil
ScottSnyder
Directors
Re: Thoughtsonthetransi tiontonewmayor
IthoughtI’dofferafewthoughts onthecomingtransitiont oanewmayor.Theseare
recommendationsIoffertoyoutoconsider.Perhapsitisbestwediscuss someofthematthefull
Councillevel,butIthi nkalltheseitemsfallunderyour authorityasCouncilPresident,asI’velaidthem
out.
1.Schedulethemayoralappointmentasexpeditiouslyaspossible.AsIofferedtoyoulastnight,I
thinkit’simportantthatweappointanew mayorasexpeditiouslyaspossible.I thinkitis
unlikelythattheCouncilwillappointsomeonewho isnotalreadyaknowncommoditytothe
position,andgiventhatth evacancyhasbeenpublicinformation nowforaboutaweek,many
folksarealreadythinkingabouttheprocess.A full30daywindowtotakeapplicationswouldbe
unnecessarytotakeapplications,andIbelievedetrimentaltoasmoothtransitiondu ringa
challengingbudgetsituation.
Rather,IbelievethatappointingthemayorassoonasJuly13 thoraslateasJuly20 thisinorder.
Anylaterwouldbeunnecessary.
Moreover,givenScott’sexplanationtous thatthereissomequestionaboutwhereexecutive
authorityforadministeringthecityduringanextended absencelies,Ithinkwewanttohaveas
smallawindowforthemayoralvacancy asispossible.Thereanum berofinstances,fromHR
complaintstoamajorpublicsafetyactionwhere clearauthorityforadministeringthecity
shouldexist,andwhichwouldnot existineitherthepositionheld byMr.Cliftonortheposition
ofMayorProTem.Hasteningtheappointmentmakesthesepossibilitieslesslikely.
2.Considera ppointing,withCouncilconfirmation,aCouncilTransitionCommittee .Thiswould
bea3councilpersoncommitteeablet omeetweeklywiththedir ectorsofthecitybeginning
immediately,andrunningthroughthe newappointmentofmayor.
Thiswouldgivesomecontinuedoversightofanddire ctiontocitystaff,but woulddosowithas
broadarolefortheCouncilas isfeasible.Withthreemembers oftheCouncil,therewouldbe
Packet Page 147 of 304
lesslikelihoodofanymatterbecomingcontroversialor oppositionalwiththestaffasmayexist
withjustoneCouncilmem berrunningsuchmeetings.
Mycommentshereregardingcontroversyandopposition arenotareflectionofanyoneorset
ofpersonalities.Rather,theystemfrommyexperiencelastyearasCouncilPr esidentleading
thelevyworkgroup.Thedirectorsare,inmyview,acommittedsetoffolkswhofulfilltheir
dutieswithpassionandsincerity.Addtothatthe pressureofperceived loomingbudgetcuts,
andonoccasionthatpassionandsincerityc ansometimesleadtoamistrustofCounciland
Councilmem bers.Duringthatlevyworkgroup,allp articipantsweremovingtowardsthesame
goal,yetcontentiousnessstillbecameadominant characteristicofthatworkgroupinitsfinal
days.
Ifsuchdifficultiesweretooccur here,havingthreeCouncilmembersparticipateinsucha
TransitionCommitteewouldmitigateagainsttherebeinganymis trustorotherimplication
placedonyouasMayorProTem.Itwouldgenerallyconnect thestaffmoredirectlytothe
Councilasawhole,andwouldlikelylea dtoastrongerworkingrelationshipbetweenCouncil
andstaffthatmaynothavebeenpossibleunderdifferentoreventhecurrentcircumstances.
Myrecommendationisthatyou,inyourcapacity asMayorProTem,andStrom,inhiscapacity
asCouncilPresidentProTem,serveonthatcommittee.Itmaymakesenseforonemore
membertobeinvolvedandI wouldsuggestleaving thatselectionto youandStrom.
3.Considerplanningasum merretreatforlateAugust.Withanewmayor,anewCouncil
member,andadifficultbudgetsessioncoming,Iwo uldsuggestwemaketimetogetawayfora
retreatofstaffandCouncil,with thenewmayor.Ibelieveitiscriticalthatweallgetaway
togethertospendtimediscussing thefutureofthe citytogether.Ifwe candothisawayfrom
thetypicalsettingofCityHallor Councilchambers,allthebetter.
ThereisvalueinhavingaCouncilcentricretreat,liketheone wehadthislastFebruary.
However,the reisalsosignificantvalueinhavingsuchmeet ingswiththeentirestaffandmayor.
Ontheonehand,Ibelievew ehavemonumentalbudgetde cisionsaheadofus.Staffis
consideringoptionstobestinformusinfinegraind etailabouthowthe Cityoperatessoasto
bettereduca teusaheadofthosebudgetdecisions.Thiswouldbeagoodtimetospend814
hoursworkingthroughthatmaterial.
Ontheotherhand,I thinkitisalsocriticallyimportant thatwecometogetherasaCounciland
improveourpersonalinteractionswithone another,andwiththestaff.Th esocialtime
affordedusatanoutoftownretreatsetting,awayfromcamerasandthelimelight(though
citizensandreportersarecertainlyfreetoattend),g iveusaspecialopportunitytogettoknow
oneanotherpersonally.
ManyhavecommentedonthedivisivenatureoftheCouncilthesedays,andth econfrontational
attitudeCouncilandstaffoftendisplaytowardsone another.IbelieveIamguiltyforplayingmy
partinsomeofthat,aseachofusaretovarying degrees.However,Iwouldhopethatwecan
allworktoputthatbehindus.AsocialgatheringataretreatawayfromEd mondsgivesusa
chancetodosomeofthat.
Packet Page 148 of 304
Foradditionalperspective,bythattime,wewillhave 3ofour8elected members(Counciland
mayor)havingearnedtheirseatb yappointmentratherthanbye lection.Thatmaybe
unprecedented,asIknowofno othercitywhichhashadsuch turnoverinmy15yearsasan
observerofWashingtonStatepoliti cs.Itmayhavehappened,butI amnotawareofthathaving
beenthecase.ScottSnyder hasmadeasimilarcommenttomeabouthisexperience.
Inshort,wehavemanynewfaces,diminishedinstitutionalunderstandingofhowtheCityand
budgetingprocessworks,andfewpers onalbondsandrelationshipsin placetohelpusnavigate
thechallengesahead.Aretreatwould helpusaddressthoseconcerns.
4.ConsiderschedulingbudgetingworkshopsforCouncil.Twoyearsago,IservedontheBudget
ReviewCommitteewithCouncilmemberRonWambolt.Mr.Plunkettmayhavealsoservedon
suchacom mitteeinyearspast.Thatmeansofthe 8electedmembers(Council,mayor)come
August,only1or2ofuswillhaveworkedthrough thebudgetprocessfrom beginningtoend.
Moreover,Mr.Cliftoninformedmethatthe 2008budgetprocessinwhich Iparticipatedwasa
simplifiedver sionofadifferentmodelusedpreviously.So,asabody,clearlywehaveagreat
dealtolearnaboutputtingabudgettogether.
Itmightmakealotofsense toinvitethestaff,givever ydetailedbudgetreportsofeachcity
agency,includingproposeddecisionpa ckets,currentand/orproposedstaffworkload
allocations,et c,toCouncil.Thesewouldlikely bestworkinmoreinformalsettings,likemeeting
intheBrackettRoomorinCouncilchambersattabl esinfrontofthedais.ThestandardCouncil
setupisnotlikelythebestarrangementforareal engaged,honest“backandfor th”of
questionsandanswers.
Packet Page 149 of 304
AM-3141 5.
Public Hearing on the Application for a Concession Agreement
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:20 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the application for a renewal of a Concession Agreement. The agreement
is for the use of the public right-of-way to vend food and beverages. The site is located at
James Street immediately east of the ferry holding lanes and is adjacent to the SR104 park.
(Applicant: Kalani Kahaialii, Angelo Narciso, Cyndi Aiona Cook / Shorts ‘N Slippas, LLC)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Concession Agreement.
Previous Council Action
On June 17, 2008, the City Council approved a one-year Concession Agreement with Shorts 'N
Slippas.
On July 7, 2009, the City Council approved an additional one-year Concession Agreement with
Shorts 'N Slippas.
Narrative
Attached as Exhibit 1 is the application submitted by Shorts 'N Slippas to renew the Concession
Agreement for the use of the public right-of-way located at the end of James Street. The applicant
has a trailer placed on the site for the vending of food and beverages. The business is also known
as "Da Hula Hut." They have been in business at this site since July 2008.
Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.04, Concession Agreements, states that Concession Agreements
may be granted at the sole discretion of the City Council. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a copy of the
Code.
The City Attorney has approved the proposed new Concession Agreement (Exhibit 3). No
changes have been made to the previously approved agreement. The monthly lease amount is
$103.00 plus leasehold excise tax in the amount of $13.23 for a total of $116.23. An increase in
the monthly lease amount was not proposed by staff due to the slow growth in the economy.
The City Attorney suggested that the following two questions be posed to the City Council: Does
the Council want to consider the rent? Does the Council want to approve a shorter term so as to
take proposals from other entities prior to next summer?
Packet Page 150 of 304
Exhibit 4 is the exhibit referenced in the Concession Agreement.
Exhibit 5 is a letter from Joel Goldstein in support of the renewal of the Concession Agreement.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1 - Application for Concession Agreement
Link: Exhibit 2 - City Code Chapter 4.04
Link: Exhibit 3 - Concession Agreement
Link: Exhibit 4 - Aerial View of the Site (Exhibit A to the Concession Agreement)
Link: Exhibit 5 - Letter in Support
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 12:28 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/09/2010 01:27
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 151 of 304
Packet Page 152 of 304
Packet Page 153 of 304
Packet Page 154 of 304
Packet Page 155 of 304
Packet Page 156 of 304
Packet Page 157 of 304
Packet Page 158 of 304
Packet Page 159 of 304
Packet Page 160 of 304
Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.04
CONCESSION AGREEMENTS
Sections:
4.04.010 Concession agreements.
4.04.020 Concession agreements on public property.
4.04.030 Leases of public right-of-way.
4.04.040 Exemptions.
4.04.010 Concession agreements.
A concession agreement is a lease of public property or city right-of-way. Decisions to
lease city property or public right-of-way are legislative decisions to be granted at the
sole discretion of the city council.
By way of illustration and not limitation, a concession agreement may provide for the
lease of public property or right-of-way for private use to vend food or beverages, rent
bicycles, roller skates, fishing equipment or other uses which the city council, in its sole
discretion, believes are consistent with the public's full use and enjoyment of park, public
property or right-of-way, or enhance the general atmosphere of the community. [Ord.
3604 § 1, 2006].
4.04.020 Concession agreements on public property.
A. “Public property” shall mean any property in fee by the city of Edmonds.
B. Concession agreements may be granted at the sole discretion of the city council from
time to time as it deems appropriate. The revenue from the lease of public property shall
accrue to the general fund; provided, however, that concession agreements for lease of
property owned, purchased or utilized by a utility or other special purpose fund shall
accrue to that fund.
C. Such agreements shall be approved by the city council in a form created and approved
by the city attorney. The lessee shall provide proof of insurance in a minimum of
$1,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate and shall fully indemnify and
hold harmless the city, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.
D. A concession agreement relating to park property shall comply in all respects a park
plan adopted as a part of the city's comprehensive plan. No concession agreement shall be
approved for park property until approved in the applicable portion of the comprehensive
plan, parks element.
Packet Page 161 of 304
E. Concession agreements relating to park property shall be approved only after a public
hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted at least at three locations at the
perimeter of the park property and at the site sought for lease by a concessionaire. [Ord.
3604 § 1, 2006].
4.04.030 Leases of public right-of-way.
A. “Public right-of-way” shall mean property held for street or alley purposes and shall
typically be limited to unopened city right-of-way. The lease of public right-of-way
developed for street purposes shall incorporate applicable terms from the street use
provisions of Chapter 18.70 ECDC.
B. Any concession agreement for the lease of unopened street right-of-way shall confer
no vested right on the lessee. Any concession or lease agreement drafted by the city
attorney shall provide that it may be terminable at the will of the city council with or
without cause. On termination, a pro-rated portion of the lease payment shall be
returnable to the concessionaire or lessee.
C. The lessee shall provide proof of insurance in a minimum of $1,000,000 per
occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate and shall fully indemnify and hold harmless
the city, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. [Ord. 3607 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3604
§ 1, 2006].
4.04.040 Exemptions.
Persons leasing property from the city through a concession agreement shall obtain a city
business license. The use of property leased under a concession agreement shall be
consistent with the uses permitted in the adjacent zone. “Adjacent zone” means that
zoning, other than public zoning or right-of-way designation, which is closest to the area
leased. In the event that differing zones are equidistant from the leased property, the more
restrictive use provisions of an adjacent zone shall be applied. [Ord. 3604 § 1, 2006].
Packet Page 162 of 304
{WSS695776.DOC;1\00006.900000\}
1
CONCESSION AGREEMENT
COMES NOW, the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation (hereinafter
“City”) and Shorts ‘n Slippas, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company (hereinafter
“Concessionaire”) under the terms and conditions set forth herein:
1. Statement of Purpose. The purpose of this Concession Agreement is to authorize
the temporary use as described herein of the unopened right of way of James Street immediately
east of the ferry holding lanes and adjacent to the SR 104 park. This Concession Agreement is a
legislative action of the Council, and as provided herein, may be terminated by the Council at
any time. The Concessionaire is authorized to use the location to sell food and beverages other
than alcoholic beverages. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to relieve the Concessionaire of
obtaining the approval of any necessary state or local entity, including requirements to obtain
business and street use permits as referenced in this Agreement.
2. Premises. This Concession Agreement authorizes the use of certain unopened
street right of way shown on the attached Exhibit A to the Concessionaire (hereinafter the
“Premises”). The unopened right of way of James Street, is shown on the attached Exhibit A
incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Nothing herein shall be construed to
authorize the Concessionaire to enter into the ferry holding lanes without the permission of the
Washington State Department of Transportation nor to vend its products in any location other
than the Premises.
3. Undertakings of Concessionaire. In consideration of the benefits of this
Agreement, the Concessionaire promises and agrees to:
3.1 Utilize the leased premises for the maintenance of a temporary structure.
The temporary structure is a trailer as shown on the attached Exhibits B and C, incorporated by
this reference as fully as if herein set forth. This temporary structure (hereinafter “Trailer”) shall
comply in respects with the State Building Code and the requirements of the Snohomish County
Health Department.
3.2 Pay to the City the sum of $116.23 per month comprised of a base rent
amount of $103.00 plus leasehold excise tax (12.84%) in the amount of $13.23. Such sum shall
be paid on or before the first day of each month. Any payment not received by the fifth business
day of each and every month shall be subject to a $25 service charge. Failure to remit the lease
payment and service charge by the 15th day of each month shall be grounds for immediate
termination of these provisions. In addition, an additional service charge of $25 shall be added
for every period of five (5) business days thereafter.
3.3 Obtain a business license from the City for this location in accordance
with the Edmonds City Code.
3.4 The Concessionaire shall provide as a part of the street use permit process
a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional named insured. The policy shall
Packet Page 163 of 304
{WSS695776.DOC;1\00006.900000\}
2
provide public liability protection in the minimum amount of $1 million per occurrence and
$2 million in aggregate. The insurance policy shall be primary as to any other policy of
insurance. It shall provide that the policy may not be cancelled except upon the provision of
thirty (30) days written notice to the City. The trailer to be installed is a temporary structure
which does not require architectural design review in accordance with the provisions of ECDC
18.70.030.
3.5 No sales of retail goods or services other than the selling of food or beverages
shall be permitted. By way of illustration and not limitation, no sale of alcoholic beverages shall
be permitted from this location.
3.6 Promise to indemnify and hold harmless, on behalf of Shorts ‘n Slippas, including
the undersigned owner, as well as its successors, heirs and assigns, the City of Edmonds, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim, loss or liability of any kind or nature arising from
or out of the use of the Premises and/or the terms and conditions of this Agreement. To the
extent necessary to enforce this promise, the Concessionaire as a part of the negotiation of the
provisions of this Agreement, waives the immunities of Title 51 RCW to, but only to, the limited
extent necessary to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees.
3.7 Concessionaire may terminate this Agreement on the provision of thirty (30) days
written notice.
3.8 In the event of termination, Concessionaire shall restore the site to its original
condition and remove all structures, temporary or permanent by the date of termination. The
City may, at its option, seize any personal property, temporary structure or other object or item
left on the site and sell it in the event that it is not removed by the date of termination set in the
notice from Concessionaire. The City may, at its option, restore the site and bill Concessionaire
for the reasonable cost or restoration of the site to its original condition. If Concessionaire fails
to pay the sum within thirty (30) days, the parties agree that the City may forward the sum to a
collection agency for recovery. Concessionaire shall be responsible for any costs associated with
such recovery including reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs and the charges of the collection
agency.
4. Obligations of the City. The City shall:
4.1 Make available the unopened street right of way of James Street to the
Concessionaire for to vend food and beverage, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be
interpreted to authorize the sale of alcoholic beverages from the site.
4.2 The City Council, in its sole legislative discretion, reserves the right under
this Agreement to terminate its provisions at any time upon the provision of forty-eight (48)
hours written notice. In addition, the City Council reserves the right to seek proposals for the
leased premises or any other property or unopened right of way of the City for competitive bids
from other vendors at such time and through such a process as in its sole discretion shall
determine appropriate. The Concessionaire shall be provided an opportunity in any such future
process to make a proposal on the same terms as other proposals, but shall have no competitive
Packet Page 164 of 304
{WSS695776.DOC;1\00006.900000\}
3
advantage in the process. The lease payments provided in paragraph 3.2 above are specifically
set at a lower rate than market rates to acknowledge that this Concession Agreement is
terminable at will. In the event of termination by the City, the City shall return a pro-rata portion
of any prepaid rent.
5. No Assignment. This agreement may not be assigned without the express
approval of the Edmonds City Council, which may be withheld for any lawful reason or purpose.
6. Term. This Agreement, unless earlier terminated as herein provided, shall expire
on June 30, 2011. The City may allow a holdover period to permit processing an application for
renewal where, due to no fault of the applicant, the City is unable to complete its review,
including a required public hearing before the expiration date.
7. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties. It shall not
be amended except in writing with the express written consent of the parties hereto.
DONE this _______ day of _____________, 2010.
SHORTS ‘N SLIPPAS, LLC
By:
Its:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _________________________ is the
person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument,
on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the
____________________ of SHORTS ‘N SLIPPAS, LLC, to be the free and voluntary act of such
party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
DATED: ___________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Printed Name:
My appointment expires:
CITY OF EDMONDS
By:
Mayor Gary Haakenson
Packet Page 165 of 304
{WSS695776.DOC;1\00006.900000\}
4
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
By:
Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
W. Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Packet Page 166 of 304
EXHIBIT A
Packet Page 167 of 304
Packet Page 168 of 304
AM-3113 6.
Adopting Updated Fire and Marina Codes
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:John Westfall Time:30 Minutes
Department:Fire Type:Action
Review Committee:Public Safety , Community/Development Services
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing, followed by action, on a proposed Ordinance amending Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) Titles 19.25 and 19.65, adopting updated 2009
International Fire Code and City Marina Code.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Move to adopt the attached Ordinance adopting the 2009 International Fire Code and City Marina
Codes, amending Title 19.25 and 19.65 of the ECDC.
Previous Council Action
Reviewed by Public Safety and Community/Development Services Committees on 5/11/10.
Narrative
The 2009 International Building Codes, as amended by the State, become effective statewide on
July 1, 2010.
The Ordinance attached adopts the 2009 fire and marina codes as stipulated under the RCW and
provides amendments that blend the codes into the framework of the ECDC. Additionally there are
some proposed language changes to the ECDC to help eliminate redundancies, delete superseded
codes and to simplify the format.
Notable changes to the 2009 edition of the International Fire Code, WA amendments include:
New high-rise requirements,
Emergency responder radio coverage,
Rewrite for fire alarm requirements in all occupancies,
Carbon monoxide detection in all new residential 1/11 & existing 7/11,
City changes to title 19.25 include:
Reorganization and rewrite of chapters in logical sequence and clarifying language,
Testing and acceptance methods for emergency responder radio coverage,
Restriction of aboveground flam I & II (gasoline/fuel) tanks to 1000 g in residential zones,
Restriction of LPG (propane) tanks to 500 g WC in residential zones,
City changes to title 19.65 include:
Slip numbering and pier identification postings,
Packet Page 169 of 304
Iteration of fuel spill reporting requirement,
Marina fire protection standard (NFPA 303) in place since 2003 code adoption.
Attachments for both titles include tracked changes of current language, and new ordinance with
smooth changes, reviewed by City Attorney.
Residential fire sprinkler discussions are treated separately from this code adoption proposal.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Fire 19.25 tracked changes
Link: Marina 19.65 tracked changes
Link: 19.25 and 19.65 ECDC
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 03:46 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: John
Westfall
Started On: 06/01/2010 03:43
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 170 of 304
Chapter 19.25
FIRE CODE
Sections:
19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted.
Adoption of life safety and maintenance codes.
19.25.005 Section amendments.
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
19.25.015 Definitions.
19.25.020 Permits.
19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection.
19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems.
Fire extinguishers and systems service.
19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies.
19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
19.25.050 Mains and service lines.
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
19.25.065 Hydrant specifications.
19.25.070 Penalties.
19.25.000 Adoption of life safety and maintenance codesInternational Fire Code
adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, tThe International Fire Code
(IFC), 2009 Edition, as published by the International Code Council including amendments set
forth in Chapter 51-54 of the Washington Administrative Code, and subsequently revised by
this chapter, is hereby adopted including reference standards of the National Fire Protection
Association and Appendix Chapters B, C, and J.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, the 2006 Edition of the
International Fire Code (IFC) as published by the International Code Council including the
state amendments set forth in Chapter 51-54 WAC, including reference standards of the
National Fire Protection Association and the following Appendices: B (Fire-Flow Requirements
for Buildings), C (Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution), E (Hazard Categories) and F
(Hazard Ranking) are adopted by reference as if fully set forth as the fire code of the city of
Edmonds. The International Existing Building Code is not adopted and all references to that
code shall be disregarded. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.25.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended, deleted or replaced as
follows:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Adopted as originally set forth in IFC
(notwithstanding revisions thereto by the state building council).
2. Section 103.1-.2 Department of Fire Prevention. Replaced by 19.25.010 ECDC.
3. Section 104.8 Modifications.
The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25"
Replaced by 19.25.030 ECDC.
Packet Page 171 of 304
International Fire Code upon application in writing by the owner, lessee, or his duly
authorized agent. Where there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of this
code, the fire marshal shall have the authority to grant modifications or alternative
materials and methods that shall observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire- and life-
safety, secure public health, and do substantial justice. Details of actions granting
modifications shall be recorded and preserved in the records of the department of fire
prevention to aid in conformance and uniform application of related codes, ordinances,
and standards.
4. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and other enforcement
agencies shall have the authority to render necessary assistance in the investigation of
fires and enforcement of the life safety provisions of this code when requested by the
fire marshal.
2. Section 104.11.2 Obstructing operations. No person shall obstruct the operations of
the fire department in connection with extinguishment control or investigation of any
fire, or actions relative to other emergencies, or disobey any lawful command of the
fire chief or officer of the fire department in charge of the emergency, or any part
thereof, or any lawful order of a police officer assisting the fire department.
35. Section 105.1.1 Permits required. Replaced by 19.25.020 ECDC.
6. Section 108 Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
7. Section 109.3 Violation Penalties. Replaced by 19.25.070 ECDC.
B. Chapter 5, Fire Service Features
Section 503 (Fire Apparatus Access Roads). The following sections are adopted as
originally set forth in the IFC (notwithstanding revisions thereto by the state building
council):
1. Section 503.1 Where required.
2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities.
3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access.
4. Section 503.1.3 High-piled storage.
5. Section 503.2 Specifications.
6. Section 503.3 Marking.
7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads.
C. Chapter 9, Fire Protection Systems.
1. Section 901.6.1 Standards. Fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and
maintained in accordance with the referenced standards listed in Table 901.6.1 and
Packet Page 172 of 304
this chapter. For the sole purpose of inspecting, testing and maintenance of water-
based fire protection systems in accordance with NFPA 25, all existing water-based
fire protection systems shall be considered new as of July 1, 2004.
2. Section 904.11.7 Existing commercial cooking systems. Existing fire suppression
systems not in compliance with Underwriters Laboratory Standard 300 shall be
replaced with a conforming system by July 1, 2005.
DC. Chapter 33, Explosives and Fireworks.
Section 3301.1.3 Fireworks. Exceptions No. 3 and No. 4 rReplaced by Chapter 5.27
ECC.
D. Chapter 34 Flammable and Combustible Liquids.
Sections 3404.2.9.6.1 (outside) and 3406.2.4.4 (inside) Locations where above-ground
tanks are prohibited. Class I and II flammable liquids in aboveground storage tanks are
restricted for the protection of residential districts and shall be no more than 1,000
gallons capacity in residential zones designated by the city.
E. Chapter 38 Liquified Petroleum Gases.
Section 3804.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The maximum capacity for
each installation is restricted for the protection of residential districts within the city and
shall be no more than 500 gallons water capacity in residential zones designated by
the city.
F. Chapter 45, Marinas. Replaced in entirety by Chapter 19.65 ECDC.
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
A. There is established in the city fire department a department of fire prevention
supervised by the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention acting under the supervision
of the fire chief. The function of the department shall be the implementation, administration
and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
B. Whenever the term “fire code official” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal or
deputy chief of fire prevention.
C. The IFC shall be enforced by the department of fire prevention.
C. The fire code official shall be the fire marshal who shall be in charge of the department of
fire prevention and who shall be appointed by the mayor on the basis of applicable civil
service rules and regulations for the city.
D. The fire marshal may recommend to the fire chief the employment of technical officers,
inspectors and other employees. If approved, technical officers and inspectors shall be hired
or assigned for that purpose.
E. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor containing all proceedings under this
code, with other statistics as the fire marshal of the city fire department may and mayor wish
to include. The fire marshal may also recommend any changes to the code.
19.25.015 Definitions.
A. Whenever the term “fire code official” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the fire marshal or
deputy chief of fire prevention.
Packet Page 173 of 304
B. Whenever the word “jurisdiction” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the City of Edmonds.
B. Whenever the term “chief administrative officer” or “fire chief” is used in the IFC, it shall
mean the fire chief.
CC. Whenever the term “legal representative of the jurisdiction” is used in the IFC, it shall
mean the city city attorney.
D. Whenever the term “police” is used in the IFC, it shall mean the City of Edmonds Police
Department.
19.25.020 Permits.
A. Whenever the IFC requires a permit,Permits required by thisunder the city’s fire code
and regulated by the city shall be issued by the fire marshal. The application for the permit
shall be accompanied by the full application fee in order to vest rights under the permit and to
constitute a complete permit application. The permit fee shall be set by the city council
annually by resolution or on such review cycle as the council, in its discretion, shall determine.
All permits shall be renewed annually unless the specific time period is set forth when the
permit is granted. No permit shall be transferable and each permit shall be issued on a single
job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis, except that the fire marshal is authorized to
consolidate permits for a single location, building, or unit.
B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with the activity requires a fire
safety inspection in excess of the time estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an
inspection fee equal to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be charged
pursuant to ECDC 19.25.025.
C. The following activities regulated pursuant to the IFC shall not require a permit to be
issued under this section. Nothing herein shall be interpreted, however, to exempt these
activities from other permits or licenses required by law or ordinance. The accepted activities
are:
1. Carnivals and fairs;
2. Open flames and candles;
3. Open burning (see ECC 5.22.030
4. Fire hydrants and water control valves;
);
5. Private fire hydrants;
6. Roof-top heliports;
7. Waste handling. [Ord. 3705 § 1, 2008; Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.25.030 025 Charges for fire review and inspection.
A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire department inspection. The
cost of the permit may include an estimate of the normal time associated with the fire
inspection. Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the estimate of time
established within the ordinance is exceeded by the actual time spent inspecting a premises,
location or activity, the actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The
administrative services director is authorized to establish on an annual basis, in conjunction
with or immediately following the budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with
the provision of services by reasonable classifications of city employees.
B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in addition to the permit fee
associated with such activity. Licenses and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection
charges include, but are not limited to, public amusement licenses issued pursuant to Chapter
4.32 ECC, cabaret dance licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment
facility licenses issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses issued
pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC.
Comment [omw1]: As long as the Development
Services Dept. (Planning and Building) is okay with
these changes.
Packet Page 174 of 304
C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency of the city of Edmonds
operating within the city's general fund.
19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
A. The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this
chapter on written application by the owner, lessee, or his duly authorized agent when there
are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved modifications,
including alternative materials and methods, shall observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire-
and life-safety, secure the public health, and do substantial justice. A signed copy of approved
modifications shall be promptly given to the applicant.
B. Details of actions granting modifications and related interpretations shall be recorded and
preserved in the records of the department of fire prevention to aid in conformance and
uniform application of related codes, ordinances, and standards.
C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit
applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true
intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant
may appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the board of appeals. Such appeals shall
be governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
19.25.035 Fire extinguishers and systems service.
A. A permit or a current license/certification by an approved testing authority shall be
required for the servicing of fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing systems.
B. Applicants for a permit to service fire extinguishers and fire extinguishing systems shall
be required to take and pass an examination to be established by the fire marshal. Permit fees
are set forth in Chapter 19.70
C. Service permits shall be issued by the fire marshal. The permit may be revoked at any
time the permittee fails to comply with city, state or federal regulations. The permit is not
transferable and shall be void if the permit holder changes business address or employers.
ECDC. If the permit is not issued, because the examination is
not held or the applicant fails to complete the examination, a refund of the permit fee will be
made to the applicant.
D. The permit shall expire after five years. The permittee shall then obtain a new permit if
he wishes to continue servicing fire extinguishers or fire extinguishing systems.
E. The fire marshal may waive permit requirements for applicant when provided with proof
of current license or current certification by an approved testing authority. The fire marshal
may, as often as necessary, inquire with licensing authority regarding licensing and
certification testing methods, requirements and dates of effectiveness, prior to approval for
work performed.
F. A certificate of inspection for every system test, maintenance, activation and repair shall
be forwarded to the fire marshal upon completion of service. One copy of that record shall be
maintained on the premises.
G. Appeals regarding the administration of the fire extinguisher and fire-extinguishing
system service permit and license approval process shall file their appeal with the fire chief
and be heard before the board of appeals pursuant to Chapter 19.80
19.25.040 035 Automatic sprinkler systems.
ECDC. [Ord. 3651 § 1,
2007].
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained throughout every building
constructed under the International Residential Code containing five or more attached
dwelling units. Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in
accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling.
Packet Page 175 of 304
19.25.045 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
A. The fire marshal may modify any of the provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written
application by the owner or lessee when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the strict
letter of the code. Approved modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall
observe the spirit of the code, secure the public safety and do substantial justice. The
particulars of an approved modification shall be written by the fire marshal and kept in the
records of the department. A signed copy shall be promptly given to the applicant.
B. Fire department modifications and code interpretations shall be maintained in writing so
as to aid in conformance and uniform application to the intent of ruling fire and life safety
related codes, ordinances, and standards.
C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit
applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true
intent and meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant
may appeal from the decision of the fire marshal to the fire chief. Such appeals shall be
governed by the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80
19.25.050 040 Fire protection water supplies.
ECDC. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
All fire hydrant, water main and appurtenance installations shall meet the provisions of this
chapter as well as other applicable plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of
Edmonds, as a condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits.
19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
A. Water main replacement to city standards, plans and specifications will be accomplished
by the city in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan and adopted capital
improvement program. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the
replacement (upgrade) of the existing public main (including fire hydrants and appurtenances)
to city standard when identified by the city engineer as a condition of development approval.
The city will pay the difference in material costs only between six inches and the size that is
required to be installed only when the existing system is a looped system.
B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is required in order for any
person or entity other than fire department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant.
C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances to properties not
previously served shall be sized in accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built
to city standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or developer's expense.
D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands relating to a particular property
or development shall be installed at the developer's or property owner's expense.
E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections (C) and (D) of this section provide
service or benefits to properties other than owned by the water main installer, latecomer
agreements may be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction and
dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 35.91 RCW.
19.25.050 Mains and service lines.
A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied by not less than six-inch
looped water mains. All hydrants in areas other than single-family residential shall be supplied
by not less than eight-inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to hydrants shall be at
least eight inches in diameter, with the exception of mains up to 50 feet long which may be no
less than six inches in diameter.
B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be no less than six inches in
diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less
than eight inches in diameter.
Comment [omw2]: Not a regulatory
requirement for private development, so recommend
deleting. An alternative to deleting would be to
replace with the following “The city will endeavor to
replace water mains to city standards, plans and
specifications in accordance with the city’s water
comprehensive plan and adopted capital
improvement program.”
Packet Page 176 of 304
C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in the public right-of-way, are
improved to permanent street or highway improvement standards, any water mains in the
public right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to size or material
according to applicable city standards shall be replaced with ductile iron water mains
conforming to applicable city standards and plans.
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city.
B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street intersections where possible. Public
hydrant spacing shall be measured along vehicle access routes.
C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public hydrants shall be spaced no more
than 600 feet apart. If dead-end streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300
feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is not
over 600 feet.
D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire hydrants shall be spaced an
average of 300 feet apart. If dead-end streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over
150 feet long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public hydrant spacing is
not over 300 feet.
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use of the city for inspection
and testing at reasonable times, and for fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall
be connected to the city water main through a privately owned and maintained double
detector check valve assembly.
B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located so that a portion is more than
200 feet from a street, as measured along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire
hydrants located at the building. Single-family dwellings with a fire-flow calculation area
greater than 4,800 square feet may require a private hydrant.
C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per minute may have fire hydrants
on one side of the building only. There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any
building larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including covered parking and
storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000 gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants
shall be served by a looped main around the building or complex of buildings.
D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around the perimeter line, 50 feet
out of the buildings. All hydrants shall be placed in locations accessible to fire department
vehicles adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. The fire marshal shall determine the location
of fire hydrants depending on utility, topography and building location for maximum fire
protection.
19.25.070 065 Hydrant specifications.
A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely below grade) is prohibited.
B. Fire hydrants shall have two two-and-one-half-inch hose outlets and one four-and-one-
half-inch pumper outlet. All outlets' ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the
pumper outlet shall be provided with a four-inch Storz adapter. Fire hydrants shall meet the
American Water Works Association, Standard No. C-502 and current city standards.
C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practices and city standards, and to the approval of the city engineer,
who shall also approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There shall be a
foot valve installed between the service main and the hydrant sufficient to permit the repair
and replacement of the hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be
Packet Page 177 of 304
installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed shall be properly and
accurately marked on as-built plans or drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail,
two copies of which shall be furnished to the public works department. Valves shall be
furnished with a standard valve box.
D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade with the lowest outlet of
the hydrant at least 18 inches above the adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of
clear area around the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on the
control valve. The pumper port shall face the street, as determined by the fire marshal.
E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from damage, the fire marshal may
require hydrants to be protected by two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet
long, made either of reinforced concrete or steel.
F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to these requirements, they
shall be replaced with conforming hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established
by the city's comprehensive plan.
G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or perform any action which
results in the obstruction of a fire hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route
of approach. The owner-occupant of any area in which a hydrant is located shall be
responsible for removing weed and tree growth from around the hydrant for a distance of not
less than five feet. The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual area
around the hydrant.
H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be accomplished by city capital
contract, developers (as a condition of development) or public works department employees.
All installations are to be approved by the city engineer.
I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves and hydrants shall be pressure
tested, purified, flushed and sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works
Association, Standard No. C-502.
19.25.075 070 Penalties.
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC including those standards of the
National Fire Protection Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and
amended herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or fails to comply with any order
made thereunder, or who builds in violation of any detailed statement of specifications or
plans submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has been taken, or who
fails to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by decision of the city's board of
appeals or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally for
each and every such violation and noncompliance, respectively, be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020.
B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it
to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or
defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each day that prohibited
conditions exist or are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the
above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
Packet Page 178 of 304
Chapter 19.65
MARINAS
Sections:
19.65.000 Application.
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
19.65.010 Design live loads.
19.65.015 Materials.
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
19.65.025 Fire requirementsProtection Standard Adopted.
19.65.030 Fuel floats.
19.65.000 Application.
The provisions of this chapter apply to the construction, changes, repair and use of a
small boat marina providing covered floating boat moorage within the city. A marina is a
basin of safe anchorage providing moorage for small vessels. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
All construction on or in connection with a marina shall comply with all the provisions
of this title including permits, permit fees and penalties and all other applicable
ordinances of the city and other applicable laws. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.65.010 Design live loads.
A. Decks. Float decks shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per square
foot minimum.
B. Roofs. The roof structures shall have a design live load of at least 25 pounds per
square foot minimum.
C. Ramps. The ramps to floats shall have a design live load of at least 40 pounds per
square foot minimum. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.65.015 Materials.
A. Roofs. Roof coverings shall be noncombustible.
B. Floats. Floating structures and floats shall be material of a type approved by the
building official. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
A. Length of Floats. The maximum length of any combination of floats shall be 500
feet from the shore end of the gangplank to the outer end of the main float. A main float
is a center or side float connected by a ramp to the shore, being fixed laterally by a
system of piling but allowed to move vertically, and may have finger floats connected at
intervals.
B. Length of Roofs. The maximum length of any roof over floats shall be 400 feet,
measured along a main float. At least 75 percent of the exterior walls shall be open. The
maximum area covered shall be 30,000 square feet over any single main float area.
C. Separation. The minimum separation of covered moorage shall be 20 feet.
D. Floats, piers, and walkways shall provide an aisle not less than 44 inches in width.
E. Slips and mooring spaces shall be individually identified by an approved numeric or
alphabetic designator that shall be posted at each space. Signs indicating the space
designators located on finger piers and floats shall be posted at the base of all piers,
finger piers, floats and finger floats. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
Packet Page 179 of 304
19.65.025 Fire requirementsProtection Standard Adopted.
A. The “Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards,” 2006 Edition, of the
National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 303 is hereby adopted to provide
the minimum acceptable level of safety to life and property from fire and electrical
hazards at marinas and boatyards. The most restrictive requirements from all codes and
adopted standards may apply. In the event of any conflict between provisions of the fire
and electrical codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by this title, the fire and electrical
codes shall prevail.
AB. HydrantsAccess and Water Supply. Piers shall be provided with fire apparatus
access roads and water-supply systems with on-site hydrants where required by the Fire
Marshal. The maximum distance from any point on a float system to an approved fire
hydrant shall be 600 feet, except for fuel floats there shall be 300’.
C. Emergency operations staging areas. Approved areas on piers and ashore shall be
provided for the staging of emergency equipment. These areas shall be posted with
approved signage to keep clear for emergency operations..Approved fire extinguishers
shall be placed at covered moorage along the main float system at intervals not
exceeding 120 feet from any single covered boat stall.
19.65.030 Fuel floats.
B. Fuel Floats.
1. Fuel floats shall be constructed of gas-resistant flotation material and shall be
separated from other floats by at least 80 feet of open water.
2. All fuel storage tanks shall be located underground.
3. All fuel lines shall be provided with flexible connections from shore to floating
facilities.
4. Fire extinguishers shall be provided near fuel dispensers as approved by the
Edmonds fire department.
5. Gangplank access from shore to fuel floats shall be within 175 feet of fuel
dispensers.
6. Fresh water taps shall be available on fuel floats.
7. All portions of a fuel float shall be located within 300 feet of a fire hydrant.
8. Moorage at any fuel float shall be prohibited and unlawful except during the
shortest time necessary to take on fuel. Moorage shall be unlawful at any fuel float at
any time the fuel pumps are not open for business and physically attended by the fuel
pump proprietor, his agent, employee or port tenant trained to a fire department
approved environmental and safety standard. It shall be the independent responsibility of
the fuel pump proprietor, vessel operator, and vessel owner to comply with this
subsection and each said person or class of persons shall be subject to the penalties of
ECC 5.50.020 for any and all violations hereof.
9. All fuel spills shall be reported immediately in accordance with local, state and
federal requirementsto the fire department and jurisdictional authorities.
C. Fire Protection Standard Adopted. The “Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and
Boatyards,” 2006 Edition, of the National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 303
is hereby adopted to provide the minimum acceptable level of safety to life and property
from fire and electrical hazards at marinas and boatyards. In the event of any conflict
between provisions of the fire and electrical codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by
this title, the fire and electrical codes shall prevail. [Ord. 3651 § 1, 2007].
Packet Page 180 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 1 -
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING TITLE 19 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REVISE
CHAPTERS 19.25 AND 19.65 CONCERNING FIRE CODE
AND MARINAS, RESPECTIVELY; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 19.27 RCW establishes the State Building code and requires
each jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of the State Building code, and
WHEREAS, the International Fire code is a part of the State Building code, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 19.27.060, the City has the ability to amend
administrative provisions thereof, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1
Chapter 19.25
FIRE CODE
. Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (“ECDC”) is
hereby amended by the repeal of Chapter 19.25 ECDC and the adoption of a new Chapter 19.25
ECDC relating to Fire Code, which shall read as follows:
Sections:
19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted.
19.25.005 Section amendments.
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
19.25.015 Definitions.
19.25.020 Permits.
19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection.
19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems.
19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies.
Packet Page 181 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 2 -
19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
19.25.050 Mains and service lines.
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
19.25.065 Hydrant specifications.
19.25.070 Penalties.
19.25.000 International Fire Code adopted.
Under the statutory authority of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074,
the International Fire Code (IFC), 2009 Edition, as published by
the International Code Council including amendments set forth in
Chapter 51-54 of the Washington Administrative Code, and
subsequently revised by this chapter, is hereby adopted including
reference standards of the National Fire Protection Association and
Appendix Chapters B, C, and J.
19.25.005 Section amendments.
The following sections of the IFC have been added, amended,
deleted or replaced as follows:
A. Chapter 1 Administration.
1. Section 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Adopted as
originally set forth in IFC (notwithstanding revisions thereto by
the state building council).
2. Section 103.1-.2 Department of Fire Prevention. Replaced by
19.25.010 ECDC
3. Section 104.8 Modifications. Replaced by 19.25.030 ECDC
4. Section 104.10.1 Assistance from other agencies. Police and
other enforcement agencies shall have the authority to render
necessary assistance in the investigation of fires and
enforcement of the life safety provisions of this code when
requested by the fire marshal
5. Section 105.1.1 Permits required. Replaced by 19.25.020
ECDC
6. Section 108 Board of appeals. Replaced by Chapter 19.80
ECDC
7. Section 109.3 Violation Penalties. Replaced by 19.25.070
ECDC
B. Chapter 5, Fire Service Features
Packet Page 182 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 3 -
Section 503 Fire Apparatus Access Roads. The following sections
are adopted as originally set forth in the IFC (notwithstanding
revisions thereto by the state building council):
1. Section 503.1 Where required.
2. Section 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities.
3. Section 503.1.2 Additional access.
4. Section 503.1.3 High-piled storage.
5. Section 503.2 Specifications.
6. Section 503.3 Marking.
7. Section 503.4 Obstruction of fire apparatus access roads.
C. Chapter 33, Explosives and Fireworks.
Section 3301.1.3 Fireworks. Replaced by Chapter 5.27 ECC.
D. Chapter 34 Flammable and Combustible Liquids.
Sections 3404.2.9.6.1 (outside) and 3406.2.4.4 (inside) Locations
where above-ground tanks are prohibited. Class I and II flammable
liquids in aboveground storage tanks are restricted for the
protection of residential districts and shall be no more than 1,000
gallons capacity in residential zones designated by the city.
E. Chapter 38 Liquified Petroleum Gases.
Section 3804.2 Maximum capacity within established limits. The
maximum capacity for each installation is restricted for the
protection of residential districts within the city and shall be no
more than 500 gallons water capacity in residential zones
designated by the city.
F. Chapter 45, Marinas. Replaced in entirety by Chapter 19.65
ECDC.
19.25.010 Department of fire prevention.
A. There is established in the city a department of fire
prevention supervised by the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire
prevention acting under the supervision of the fire chief. The
function of the department shall be the implementation,
administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code.
Packet Page 183 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 4 -
B. An annual report shall be provided to the mayor containing
proceedings under this code, with other statistics as the fire
marshal and mayor wish to include. The fire marshal may also
recommend any changes to the code.
19.25.015 Definitions.
A. Whenever the term “fire code official” is used in the IFC, it
shall mean the fire marshal or deputy chief of fire prevention.
B. Whenever the word “jurisdiction” is used in the IFC, it shall
mean the City of Edmonds.
C. Whenever the term “legal representative of the jurisdiction”
is used in the IFC, it shall mean the city attorney.
D. Whenever the term “police” is used in the IFC, it shall mean
the City of Edmonds Police Department.
19.25.020 Permits.
A. Permits required under the city’s fire code and regulated by
the city shall be issued by the fire marshal. The application for the
permit shall be accompanied by the full application fee in order to
vest rights under the permit and to constitute a complete permit
application. The permit fee shall be set by the city council annually
by resolution or on such review cycle as the council, in its
discretion, shall determine. All permits shall be renewed annually
unless the specific time period is set forth when the permit is
granted. No permit shall be transferable and each permit shall be
issued on a single job, transaction, owner, or occupancy basis,
except that the fire marshal is authorized to consolidate permits for
a single location, building, or unit.
B. In the event that the activity, location or risk associated with
the activity requires a fire safety inspection in excess of the time
estimated within the permit fee (one hour) an inspection fee equal
to the actual cost to the city of providing the inspection shall be
charged pursuant to ECDC 19.25.025.
19.25.025 Charges for fire review and inspection.
A. Certain licenses and permits issued by the city include a fire
department inspection. The cost of the permit may include an
estimate of the normal time associated with the fire inspection.
Where the permit does not include such an estimate, or when the
estimate of time established within the ordinance is exceeded by
the actual time spent inspecting a premises, location or activity, the
actual cost of conducting the inspection shall be charged. The
administrative services director is authorized to establish on an
annual basis, in conjunction with or immediately following the
budget process, a fee for the hourly charge associated with the
Packet Page 184 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 5 -
provision of services by reasonable classifications of city
employees.
B. The permittee shall pay the actual charges of inspection, in
addition to the permit fee associated with such activity. Licenses
and permits requiring the actual payment of inspection charges
include, but are not limited to, public amusement licenses issued
pursuant to Chapter 4.32 ECC, cabaret dance licenses issued
pursuant to Chapter 4.48 ECC, adult entertainment facility licenses
issued pursuant to Chapter 4.52 ECC, and aircraft landing licenses
issued pursuant to Chapter 4.80 ECC.
C. No charge shall be levied against any department or agency
of the city of Edmonds operating within the city's general fund.
19.25.030 Modifications, interpretations and appeals.
A. The fire marshal shall have the authority to modify any of the
provisions of the IFC or this chapter on written application by the
owner, lessee, or his duly authorized agent when there are practical
difficulties in carrying out the strict letter of the code. Approved
modifications, including alternative materials and methods, shall
observe the spirit of the code, preserve fire- and life-safety, secure
the public health, and do substantial justice. A signed copy of
approved modifications shall be promptly given to the applicant.
B. Details of actions granting modifications and related
interpretations shall be recorded and preserved in the records of the
department of fire prevention to aid in conformance and uniform
application of related codes, ordinances, and standards.
C. Whenever the fire marshal disapproves an application or
refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the
provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and
meaning of the code have been misconstrued or wrongly
interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of the fire
marshal to the board of appeals. Such appeals shall be governed by
the procedures set forth in Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
19.25.035 Automatic sprinkler systems.
An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and maintained
throughout every building constructed under the International
Residential Code containing five or more attached dwelling units.
Residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be
used in accordance with their approved listing in the dwelling.
19.25.040 Fire protection water supplies.
All fire hydrant, water main and appurtenance installations shall
meet the provisions of this chapter as well as other applicable
plans, standards and codes adopted by the city of Edmonds, as a
condition of approval of subdivisions and building permits.
Packet Page 185 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 6 -
19.25.045 Charges for water mains and hydrants.
A. For private development, owners shall be responsible for the
replacement (upgrade) of the existing public main (including fire
hydrants and appurtenances) to city standard when identified by
the city engineer as a condition of development approval. The city
will pay the difference in material costs only between six inches
and the size that is required to be installed only when the existing
system is a looped system.
B. A hydrant use permit issued by the public works director is
required in order for any person or entity other than fire
department personnel to draw water from any fire hydrant.
C. The installation of water mains, fire hydrants and
appurtenances to properties not previously served shall be sized in
accordance with the city's water comprehensive plan, built to city
standard and shall be at the benefited property owner's or
developer's expense.
D. Oversized water mains required for special use demands
relating to a particular property or development shall be installed at
the developer's or property owner's expense.
E. If the water mains installed pursuant to subsections (C) and
(D) of this section provide service or benefits to properties other
than owned by the water main installer, latecomer agreements may
be arranged between the city and the installer for the construction
and dedication of the water facilities pursuant to the provisions of
Chapter 35.91 RCW.
19.25.050 Mains and service lines.
A. All public hydrants in single-family areas shall be supplied
by not less than six-inch looped water mains. All hydrants in areas
other than single-family residential shall be supplied by not less
than eight-inch looped water mains. Dead-end water mains to
hydrants shall be at least eight inches in diameter, with the
exception of mains up to 50 feet long which may be no less than
six inches in diameter.
B. The service line from the water main to the hydrant shall be
no less than six inches in diameter. Any service lines over 50 feet
in length from water main to hydrant shall be no less than eight
inches in diameter.
C. When city streets, or state highways having water mains in
the public right-of-way, are improved to permanent street or
highway improvement standards, any water mains in the public
right-of-way of said streets or highways that are substandard as to
size or material according to applicable city standards shall be
replaced with ductile iron water mains conforming to applicable
city standards and plans.
Packet Page 186 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 7 -
19.25.055 Location of public hydrants.
A. Public hydrants are those owned by the city.
B. All public fire hydrants shall be installed at street
intersections where possible. Public hydrant spacing shall be
measured along vehicle access routes.
C. In areas zoned for single-family residential use, public
hydrants shall be spaced no more than 600 feet apart. If dead-end
streets, or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 300 feet
long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public
hydrant spacing is not over 600 feet.
D. In areas other than single-family residential, public fire
hydrants shall be spaced an average of 300 feet apart. If dead-end
streets or driveways, singly or in combination, are over 150 feet
long, additional public hydrants shall be installed so that the public
hydrant spacing is not over 300 feet.
19.25.060 Location of private hydrants.
A. A private hydrant is privately owned, but is subject to the use
of the city for inspection and testing at reasonable times, and for
fire suppression at any time. All private hydrants shall be
connected to the city water main through a privately owned and
maintained double detector check valve assembly.
B. All buildings except single-family dwellings that are located
so that a portion is more than 200 feet from a street, as measured
along vehicle access routes, shall have private fire hydrants located
at the building. Single-family dwellings with a fire-flow
calculation area greater than 4,800 square feet may require a
private hydrant.
C. Buildings having required fire flows of 3,000 gallons per
minute may have fire hydrants on one side of the building only.
There shall never be fewer than two fire hydrants for any building
larger than 5,000 square feet in the first floor area including
covered parking and storage. When the required fire flow is 3,000
gallons per minute or greater, the fire hydrants shall be served by a
looped main around the building or complex of buildings.
D. Fire hydrants shall be spaced on an average 300 feet around
the perimeter line, 50 feet out of the buildings. All hydrants shall
be placed in locations accessible to fire department vehicles
adjacent to fire apparatus access roads. The fire marshal shall
determine the location of fire hydrants depending on utility,
topography and building location for maximum fire protection.
19.25.065 Hydrant specifications.
A. The installation of flush type hydrants (hydrants entirely
below grade) is prohibited.
B. Fire hydrants shall have two two-and-one-half-inch hose
outlets and one four-and-one-half-inch pumper outlet. All outlets'
Packet Page 187 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 8 -
ports shall have national standard thread. Additionally, the pumper
outlet shall be provided with a four-inch Storz adapter. Fire
hydrants shall meet the American Water Works Association,
Standard No. C-502 and current city standards.
C. Fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be installed in
accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and city
standards, and to the approval of the city engineer, who shall also
approve the selection and use of all pipe fittings and valves. There
shall be a foot valve installed between the service main and the
hydrant sufficient to permit the repair and replacement of the
hydrant without disruption of water service. The foot valve shall be
installed to city standards. The location of all such valves installed
shall be properly and accurately marked on as-built plans or
drawings with generally acceptable engineering detail, two copies
of which shall be furnished to the public works department. Valves
shall be furnished with a standard valve box.
D. Hydrants shall stand plumb, be set to established street grade
with the lowest outlet of the hydrant at least 18 inches above the
adjacent finished grade and at least 36 inches of clear area around
the hydrant for clearance of hydrant wrench on both outlets and on
the control valve. The pumper port shall face the street, as
determined by the fire marshal.
E. Where reasonably necessary to protect a hydrant from
damage, the fire marshal may require hydrants to be protected by
two or more posts, eight inches in diameter by five feet long, made
either of reinforced concrete or steel.
F. If there presently exist fire hydrants which do not conform to
these requirements, they shall be replaced with conforming
hydrants upon redevelopment or the timetable established by the
city's comprehensive plan.
G. No person shall plant any vegetation, erect any structure or
perform any action which results in the obstruction of a fire
hydrant for a distance of 50 feet along the immediate route of
approach. The owner-occupant of any area in which a hydrant is
located shall be responsible for removing weed and tree growth
from around the hydrant for a distance of not less than five feet.
The purpose of this section is to maintain clear approach and visual
area around the hydrant.
H. The installation of the fire hydrants and mains may be
accomplished by city capital contract, developers (as a condition of
development) or public works department employees. All
installations are to be approved by the city engineer.
I. Following the installation of fire hydrants, all pipes, valves
and hydrants shall be pressure tested, purified, flushed and
sampled to meet the requirements of the American Water Works
Association, Standard No. C-502.
Packet Page 188 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 9 -
19.25.070 Penalties.
A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of the IFC
including those standards of the National Fire Protection
Association specifically referenced in the IFC as adopted and
amended herein or fails to comply therewith, or who violates or
fails to comply with any order made thereunder, or who builds in
violation of any detailed statement of specifications or plans
submitted and approved thereunder, and from which no appeal has
been taken, or who fails to comply with such an order as affirmed
or modified by decision of the city's board of appeals or by a court
of competent jurisdiction, within the required time, shall severally
for each and every such violation and noncompliance, respectively,
be guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable as provided in ECC
5.50.020.
B. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not
excuse the violation nor permit it to continue; and all such persons
shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects
within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each
day that prohibited conditions exist or are maintained shall
constitute a separate offense. The application of the above penalty
shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited
conditions.
Section 2
Chapter 19.65
MARINAS
. Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (“ECDC”) is
hereby amended by the repeal of Chapter 19.65 ECDC and the adoption of a new Chapter 19.65
ECDC relating to Marinas, which shall read as follows:
Sections:
19.65.000 Application.
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
19.65.010 Design live loads.
19.65.015 Materials.
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
19.65.025 Fire Protection Standard Adopted.
19.65.030 Fuel floats.
19.65.000 Application.
The provisions of this chapter apply to the construction,
changes, repair and use of a small boat marina providing covered
Packet Page 189 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 10 -
floating boat moorage within the city. A marina is a basin of safe
anchorage providing moorage for small vessels.
19.65.005 Building code – Compliance required.
All construction on or in connection with a marina shall comply
with all the provisions of this title including permits, permit fees
and penalties and all other applicable ordinances of the city and
other applicable laws.
19.65.010 Design live loads.
A. Decks. Float decks shall have a design live load of at least 40
pounds per square foot minimum.
B. Roofs. The roof structures shall have a design live load of at
least 25 pounds per square foot minimum.
C. Ramps. The ramps to floats shall have a design live load of at
least 40 pounds per square foot minimum.
19.65.015 Materials.
A. Roofs. Roof coverings shall be noncombustible.
B. Floats. Floating structures and floats shall be material of a
type approved by the building official.
19.65.020 Area and location requirements.
A. Length of Floats. The maximum length of any combination
of floats shall be 500 feet from the shore end of the gangplank to
the outer end of the main float. A main float is a center or side float
connected by a ramp to the shore, being fixed laterally by a system
of piling but allowed to move vertically, and may have finger
floats connected at intervals.
B. Length of Roofs. The maximum length of any roof over
floats shall be 400 feet, measured along a main float. At least 75
percent of the exterior walls shall be open. The maximum area
covered shall be 30,000 square feet over any single main float area.
C. Separation. The minimum separation of covered moorage
shall be 20 feet.
D. Floats, piers, and walkways shall provide an aisle not less
than 44 inches in width.
E. Slips and mooring spaces shall be individually identified by
an approved numeric or alphabetic designator that shall be posted
at each space. Signs indicating the space designators located on
finger piers and floats shall be posted at the base of all piers, finger
piers, floats and finger floats.
19.65.025 Fire Protection Standard Adopted.
A. The “Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards,”
2006 Edition, of the National Fire Protection Association
Publication No. 303 is hereby adopted to provide the minimum
Packet Page 190 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 11 -
acceptable level of safety to life and property from fire and
electrical hazards at marinas and boatyards. The most restrictive
requirements from all codes and adopted standards may apply. In
the event of any conflict between provisions of the fire and
electrical codes of the city of Edmonds as adopted by this title, the
fire and electrical codes shall prevail.
B. Access and Water Supply. Piers shall be provided with fire
apparatus access roads and water-supply systems with on-site
hydrants where required by the Fire Marshal. The maximum
distance from any point on a float system to an approved fire
hydrant shall be 600 feet, except for fuel floats there shall be 300’.
C. Emergency operations staging areas. Approved areas on piers
and ashore shall be provided for the staging of emergency
equipment. These areas shall be posted with approved signage to
keep clear for emergency operations..
19.65.030 Fuel floats.
1. Fuel floats shall be constructed of gas-resistant flotation
material and shall be separated from other floats by at least 80 feet
of open water.
2. All fuel storage tanks shall be located underground.
3. All fuel lines shall be provided with flexible connections
from shore to floating facilities.
4. Fire extinguishers shall be provided near fuel dispensers
as approved by the Edmonds fire department.
5. Gangplank access from shore to fuel floats shall be
within 175 feet of fuel dispensers.
6. Fresh water taps shall be available on fuel floats.
7. All portions of a fuel float shall be located within 300
feet of a fire hydrant.
8. Moorage at any fuel float shall be prohibited and
unlawful except during the shortest time necessary to take on fuel.
Moorage shall be unlawful at any fuel float at any time the fuel
pumps are not open for business and physically attended by the
fuel pump proprietor, his agent, employee or port tenant trained to
a fire department approved environmental and safety standard. It
shall be the independent responsibility of the fuel pump proprietor,
vessel operator, and vessel owner to comply with this subsection
and each said person or class of persons shall be subject to the
penalties of ECC 5.50.020 for any and all violations hereof.
9. All fuel spills shall be reported immediately in
accordance with local, state and federal requirements.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
Packet Page 191 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ } - 12 -
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date
. This ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 192 of 304
{BFP793110.DOC;1\00006.900070\ }
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of
Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said
ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING TITLE 19 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REVISE CHAPTERS 19.25 AND 19.65
CONCERNING FIRE CODE AND MARINAS, RESPECTIVELY;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN
THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________,2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 193 of 304
AM-3148 7.
Renewing Interim Ordinance 3780
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Rob Chave Time:15 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Continued discussion and potential action regarding the public hearing held on June 1, 2010
renewing interim Ordinance 3780, adopting certain procedures with respect to the
abandonment, construction and authorization of public projects and street vacations and
dedications.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve the interim zoning ordinance extension (Exhibit 1)
Previous Council Action
Council held a public hearing and discussed the proposal on June 1, 2010. Council voted 3-1 to
approve the draft ordinance, falling one vote shy of the 4 votes necessary for approval.
Narrative
This is a continuation of Council consideration on extending the interim zoning ordinance. Please
refer to the narrative and information from the June 1, 2010, Council packet (Exhibit 2 of this
packet).
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: City Council packet of 6/1 2010
Link: Exhibit 3: 06-01-10 City Council Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 03:46 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 06/10/2010 03:16
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 194 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/27/10
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND
AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS, STREET
VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS, PROVIDING FOR FILING
WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE AND PROVIDING FOR EXPIRATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Effect Of Plan, Sections
B and C establishes procedure for Hearing Examiner review and advisory recommendation to the
City Council, and
WHEREAS, such provisions have been in effect for many years and, while
superseded by the City’s Comprehensive Facilities Plan and other procedures mandated by the
Growth Management Act, remain in full force and effect, and
WHEREAS, there are no implementing provisions within the City’s Community
Development Code, and the Comprehensive Plain is not self executing, and
WHEREAS, the City is obligated to maintain consistency between its
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code in order to remain in compliance with the requirements of
the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Commission has scheduled a public hearing
regarding the interim ordinance but has not yet returned its recommendation, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held June 1, 2010 regarding extension of the
Packet Page 195 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
existing interim ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to:
A. Adopt interim zoning procedures to ensure compliance with the provisions
of the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and
B. Continue with review of the aforementioned provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan for review in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendment process, NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following interim zoning procedures are hereby established to be
administered in conjunction with the procedural requirements of Title 20 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code:
1.1 Public Projects
1.1.1 A proposal to construct or authorize any of the public properties
detailed in Section 1.1 which are listed on the Capital Facilities Plan, Parks Plan, Capital
Improvements Plan or other Comprehensive Plan element may be heard either individually or as
a group. The hearing before the Hearing Examiner for the construction or authorization of any
project so listed in the Comprehensive Plan shall be listed on the Hearing Examiner’s agenda,
and notice published on the City’s web site and on City bulletin boards.
No street, park or other public way, ground, place, space
or public building or structure, or utility (whether publicly or privately owned) shall be
abandoned, constructed or authorized until the Hearing Examiner has reviewed and reported to
the City Council the location, extent and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing
Examiner’s report shall be advisory only.
Packet Page 196 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 -
1.2. Notice of the Hearing Examiner review of a public project, construction or
authorization not shown on a Comprehensive Plan element shall be individually noticed in
accord with ECDC 20.03.002. By way of illustration and not limitation, such procedures shall
include posting, published notice and mailed notice to property owners within three hundred
(300) feet of the project.
1.2. Street Vacations and Dedication. The Comprehensive Plan shall be
consulted prior to the establishment, improvement, abandonment or vacation of any street. No
dedication of any street or other area for public use shall be accepted by the City Council until its
location, character, extent and effect thereof shall be considered by the Hearing Examiner with
respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing Examiner’s report shall be provided to the
City Council with respect to the abandonment, vacation or dedication of any street or other right
of way in public use. Dedications within the short subdivision process which do not require City
Council acceptance of the dedication are exempt from this requirement. In any development
permit process which has been delegated to the Hearing Examiner under the provisions of the
Edmonds Community Development Code and includes the dedication of a street or other area for
public use, the Hearing Examiner shall consider whether the action is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan as a part of the Hearing Examiner’s determination on the underlying permit.
1.2.1 Hearing Examiner review shall be substituted for the Planning
Board review provided for in Chapter 20.65.010 during the life of this interim ordinance. The
hearing procedures and notification for any other process shall be consistent with the
requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.65 and as a Type V procedure.
1.2.2 Review of a dedication with a permit shall be processed in the
same manner as the underlying development permit.
Packet Page 197 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 4 -
1.2.3 Street vacations shall be processed as provided in Chapter 20.70
ECDC, provided, however, that the Hearing Examiner shall hold a hearing prior to City Council
consideration.
Section 2. These interim zoning procedures are adopted pursuant to the
authorization of Chapter 36.70A RCW. A public was held on the adoption of these procedures
on June 1, 2010.
Section 3. Notice of the adoption of this interim ordinance shall be provided to
the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.
Section 4. Effective Date
Section 5. The adoption of an interim zoning procedure shall expire on its own
terms six months after its effective date unless extended by act of the City Council.
. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
Packet Page 198 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 5 -
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 199 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 6 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING
CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION
AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS, STREET VACATIONS AND
DEDICATIONS, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AND PROVIDING
FOR EXPIRATION.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 200 of 304
AM-3108 7.
Renewing Interim Ordinance 3780
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/01/2010
Submitted By:Rob Chave Time:20 Minutes
Department:Planning Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing, followed by action, renewing interim Ordinance 3780, adopting certain
procedures with respect to the abandonment, construction and authorization of public
projects and street vacations and dedications.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approve adoption of the ordinance extending the interim zoning provisions (Exhibit 1).
Previous Council Action
Council adopted Ordinance #3779 on January 19, 2010 (see Exhibit 2).
Narrative
Council adopted Ordinance #3780 on January 19, 2010 which amended the Edmonds Community
Development Code to re-establish procedures requiring Hearing Examiner review for certain
public projects and approvals. By adopting the proposed ordinance, the Council will extend the
provisions while the Planning Board completes its recommendations on the issue.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance
Link: Exhibit 2: Ordinance 3780
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 05/27/2010 12:06 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 05/27/2010 12:08 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 05/27/2010 12:10 PM APRV
Form Started By: Rob
Chave
Started On: 05/26/2010 10:13
PM
Final Approval Date: 05/27/2010
Packet Page 114 of 196Packet Page 201 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
0006.90000
WSS/gjz
5/27/10
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND
AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS, STREET
VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS, PROVIDING FOR FILING
WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE AND PROVIDING FOR EXPIRATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Effect Of Plan, Sections
B and C establishes procedure for Hearing Examiner review and advisory recommendation to the
City Council, and
WHEREAS, such provisions have been in effect for many years and, while
superseded by the City’s Comprehensive Facilities Plan and other procedures mandated by the
Growth Management Act, remain in full force and effect, and
WHEREAS, there are no implementing provisions within the City’s Community
Development Code, and the Comprehensive Plain is not self executing, and
WHEREAS, the City is obligated to maintain consistency between its
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code in order to remain in compliance with the requirements of
the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Commission has scheduled a public hearing
regarding the interim ordinance but has not yet returned its recommendation, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held June 1, 2010 regarding extension of the
Packet Page 115 of 196Packet Page 202 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
existing interim ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to:
A. Adopt interim zoning procedures to ensure compliance with the provisions
of the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and
B. Continue with review of the aforementioned provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan for review in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan amendment process, NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following interim zoning procedures are hereby established to be
administered in conjunction with the procedural requirements of Title 20 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code:
1.1 Public Projects
1.1.1 A proposal to construct or authorize any of the public properties
detailed in Section 1.1 which are listed on the Capital Facilities Plan, Parks Plan, Capital
Improvements Plan or other Comprehensive Plan element may be heard either individually or as
a group. The hearing before the Hearing Examiner for the construction or authorization of any
project so listed in the Comprehensive Plan shall be listed on the Hearing Examiner’s agenda,
and notice published on the City’s web site and on City bulletin boards.
No street, park or other public way, ground, place, space
or public building or structure, or utility (whether publicly or privately owned) shall be
abandoned, constructed or authorized until the Hearing Examiner has reviewed and reported to
the City Council the location, extent and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing
Examiner’s report shall be advisory only.
Packet Page 116 of 196Packet Page 203 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 -
1.2. Notice of the Hearing Examiner review of a public project, construction or
authorization not shown on a Comprehensive Plan element shall be individually noticed in
accord with ECDC 20.03.002. By way of illustration and not limitation, such procedures shall
include posting, published notice and mailed notice to property owners within three hundred
(300) feet of the project.
1.2. Street Vacations and Dedication. The Comprehensive Plan shall be
consulted prior to the establishment, improvement, abandonment or vacation of any street. No
dedication of any street or other area for public use shall be accepted by the City Council until its
location, character, extent and effect thereof shall be considered by the Hearing Examiner with
respect to the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing Examiner’s report shall be provided to the
City Council with respect to the abandonment, vacation or dedication of any street or other right
of way in public use. Dedications within the short subdivision process which do not require City
Council acceptance of the dedication are exempt from this requirement. In any development
permit process which has been delegated to the Hearing Examiner under the provisions of the
Edmonds Community Development Code and includes the dedication of a street or other area for
public use, the Hearing Examiner shall consider whether the action is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan as a part of the Hearing Examiner’s determination on the underlying permit.
1.2.1 Hearing Examiner review shall be substituted for the Planning
Board review provided for in Chapter 20.65.010 during the life of this interim ordinance. The
hearing procedures and notification for any other process shall be consistent with the
requirements of ECDC Chapter 20.65 and as a Type V procedure.
1.2.2 Review of a dedication with a permit shall be processed in the
same manner as the underlying development permit.
Packet Page 117 of 196Packet Page 204 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 4 -
1.2.3 Street vacations shall be processed as provided in Chapter 20.70
ECDC, provided, however, that the Hearing Examiner shall hold a hearing prior to City Council
consideration.
Section 2. These interim zoning procedures are adopted pursuant to the
authorization of Chapter 36.70A RCW. A public was held on the adoption of these procedures
on June 1, 2010.
Section 3. Notice of the adoption of this interim ordinance shall be provided to
the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.
Section 4. Effective Date
Section 5. The adoption of an interim zoning procedure shall expire on its own
terms six months after its effective date unless extended by act of the City Council.
. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
Packet Page 118 of 196Packet Page 205 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 5 -
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 119 of 196Packet Page 206 of 304
{WSS791058.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 6 -
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING
CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION
AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS, STREET VACATIONS AND
DEDICATIONS, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AND PROVIDING
FOR EXPIRATION.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 120 of 196Packet Page 207 of 304
Packet Page 121 of 196Packet Page 208 of 304
Packet Page 122 of 196Packet Page 209 of 304
Packet Page 123 of 196Packet Page 210 of 304
Packet Page 124 of 196Packet Page 211 of 304
Packet Page 125 of 196Packet Page 212 of 304
Packet Page 126 of 196Packet Page 213 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 4
requested Councilmembers respond individually to those questions. He noted the Planning Board had
cancelled their public hearing on this matter.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the public
hearing.
In response to Mr. Rutledge, City Attorney Scott Snyder explained staff will be responding to the
Planning Board’s questions at a future meeting. He explained via extension of the interim ordinance,
controls remain in place until a final ordinance is adopted.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3794, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3769, WHICH DEFINED TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTER AND
IDENTIFIED ZONING DISTRICTS WHERE TEMPORARY HOMELESS SHELTERS ARE
PERMITTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, RENEWING INTERIM ORDINANCE 3779,
AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.110.040(F), MONETARY PENALTIES,
CLARIFYING THE IMPACT OF THE AMENDMENT ON EXISTING CODE ENFORCEMENT
ACTIONS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board has been briefed on this matter, City
Attorney Scott Snyder will brief them again next week and a public hearing is tentatively scheduled in
July. The interim ordinance amends the civil enforcement procedures to be consistent with state case law.
Mr. Snyder explained his memo referred to a 30-day Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) appeal period; the
appeal period is actually 21 days. He referenced RCW 36.70C.020, and explained since the City enacted
its provisions, LUPA now covers the enforcement by local jurisdiction of ordinances regulating the
improvement, development, modification, maintenance or use of real property. He recommended the
interim ordinance include that reference to provide direction to a citizen wishing to appeal.
For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Snyder cited Section 3 of the ordinance which states the
determination of the Hearing Examiner is final and shall be appealable to Superior Court in accordance
with Chapter 36.70A RCW.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
participation portion of the public hearing.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3795, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3779, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECDC 20.110.040(F), MONETARY
PENALTIES, CLARIFYING THE IMPACT OF THE AMENDMENT ON EXISTING CODE
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, RENEWING INTERIM ORDINANCE 3780,
ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE ABANDONMENT,
CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS AND STREET
VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS.
Planning Manager Rob Chave explained this is an interim zoning ordinance being reviewed by the
Planning Board. The interim ordinance clarifies that provisions of the Comprehensive Plan that require
Packet Page 214 of 304
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
June 1, 2010
Page 5
recommendation by the Hearing Examiner are still in the code. A public hearing is scheduled for June 23
and a recommendation to Council will follow.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if this also referred to property purchases by the City. Mr. Chave
answered yes; the Comprehensive Plan requires a recommendation from the Hearing Examiner in
addition to other procedures. Mr. Snyder explained for example staff had scheduled a hearing with the
Hearing Examiner to provide a recommendation prior to the closing date on the proposed purchase of the
Skipper’s property.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members
of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Haakenson closed the public
participation portion of the public hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, RENEWING INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 3780, ADOPTING CERTAIN PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE
ABANDONMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZATION OF PUBLIC PROJECTS AND
STREET VACATIONS AND DEDICATIONS. MOTION FAILED (3-1), COUNCILMEMBER
FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the passage of an ordinance required a majority vote of the Council.
Mayor Haakenson advised this item would be scheduled on the June 15 Council agenda.
Mr. Snyder asked whether Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ concern was the ordinance obligated the
City to do something that was potentially unnecessary and time consuming. Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas answered yes. Mr. Snyder explained the wording in the interim ordinance was the exact wording
in the existing Comprehensive Plan provision, a provision that is currently being reviewed. The City’s
development code and Comprehensive Plan are required to be consistent. Staff agrees with
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ concern, however, until the Comprehensive Plan was amended, the
code and Comprehensive Plan must be consistent. The interim ordinance will ensure the City complies
with the Comprehensive Plan until that process is amended. He summarized an interim zoning ordinance
could be enacted in a short period of time; the Comprehensive Plan amendment process takes a year.
Mr. Chave advised the draft amendment that will be reviewed at the Planning Board public hearing will
be available on the City’s website prior to the public hearing.
8. PUBLIC HEARING, FOLLOWED BY ACTION, ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TITLE 19, ADOPTING UPDATED
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODES.
Building Official Leonard Yarberry explained this ordinance repeals and revises elements of Title 19, the
City’s Building Code. The state mandates minimum building code standards to be enforced in all
jurisdictions, RCW 19.27. The state building code is updated on a 3-year cycle which mirrors the 3-year
national code cycle. The State Legislature adopted the 2009 international codes and mandates they be
enforced in all jurisdictions effective July 1. The proposed ordinance adopts the 2009 codes as stipulated
under the RCW and provides amendments that blend the codes into the framework of the Edmonds code.
There are also some proposed language changes to the ECDC to eliminate redundancies, delete
superseded codes and to simplify the format.
He summarized the proposed changes:
Consolidate administrative provisions: Each adopted code has its own separate administrative
section. The proposed ordinance uses the administrative provisions found in chapter one of the
Packet Page 215 of 304
AM-3150 8.
Discussion Regarding the 2011 Budget
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:Mayor Haakenson Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Discussion regarding the 2011 Budget.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Provide staff guidance.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Mayor Haakenson will discuss the 2011 Budget. Attached are copies of a PowerPoint
presentation, budget forecast information, and 2011 budget schedule.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Budget Presentation
Link: Budget Forecast Information
Link: 2011 Budget Schedule
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/11/2010 11:55 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/11/2010 11:59 AM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/11/2010 11:59 AM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/11/2010 11:39
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/11/2010
Packet Page 216 of 304
Bu
d
g
e
t
2
0
1
0
Bu
d
g
e
t
20
1
0
He
r
e
i
s
w
h
e
r
e
w
e
a
r
e
t
o
d
a
y
…
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
7
of
30
4
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
F
i
v
e
y
e
a
r
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Fi
v
e
ye
a
r
Fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
-
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
9-
J
u
n
-
1
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
:
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
20
0
9
2
0
0
9
A
c
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
RE
V
E
N
U
E
Bu
d
g
e
t
@
1
/
2
0
/
1
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
97
7
,
9
5
1
1
,
4
9
7
,
8
6
0
1
,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
2
,
3
4
9
,
8
0
7
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
1
,
3
5
3
,
8
5
3
(
6
3
5
,
4
7
9
)
(
3
,
1
3
7
,
4
1
0
)
(
6
,
2
3
9
,
1
1
0
)
(
9
,
8
4
0
,
1
7
5
)
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
1
3
,
9
3
0
,
1
7
4
1
3
,
8
2
8
,
9
0
1
1
4
,
1
6
0
,
0
6
2
1
3
,
7
1
3
,
8
2
5
1
3
,
8
8
1
,
3
9
3
1
4
,
0
4
3
,
1
4
4
1
4
,
2
8
6
,
6
1
2
1
4
,
5
4
1
,
1
5
6
1
4
,
7
8
9
,
9
2
8
1
5
,
0
4
1
,
2
4
5
Re
t
a
i
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
5
,
3
6
9
,
9
4
8
4
,
4
1
4
,
8
7
4
5
,
5
1
9
,
9
4
9
4
,
3
6
9
,
8
4
7
4
,
5
2
2
,
7
9
2
4
,
6
8
1
,
0
8
9
4
,
8
4
4
,
9
2
7
5
,
0
1
4
,
5
0
0
5
,
1
9
0
,
0
0
7
5
,
3
7
1
,
6
5
8
Ot
h
e
r
S
a
l
e
s
&
U
s
e
T
a
x
6
6
5
,
9
0
1
5
4
3
,
7
3
1
6
6
5
,
9
0
1
5
4
3
,
7
3
1
5
9
6
,
7
9
7
6
5
5
,
1
4
3
7
1
9
,
2
9
8
7
8
9
,
8
4
0
8
6
7
,
4
0
9
9
5
2
,
7
0
7
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
5,
1
0
2
,
3
1
4
5,
9
5
3
,
0
2
8
5,
2
2
5
,
3
1
1
6,
0
0
1
,
7
3
0
6,
2
3
9
,
8
3
1
6,
4
0
5
,
7
6
9
6,
5
7
6
,
8
1
2
6,
7
5
3
,
1
4
4
6,
9
3
4
,
9
5
6
7,
1
2
2
,
4
5
0
Ot
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
29
7
,
5
0
0
30
1
,
6
3
3
29
7
,
5
0
0
30
6
,
4
5
7
31
1
,
9
8
2
31
7
,
6
1
1
32
3
,
3
4
6
32
9
,
1
9
1
33
5
,
1
4
6
34
1
,
2
1
3
Li
c
e
n
s
e
s
/
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
/
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
1,
3
8
9
,
9
4
3
1,
0
2
3
,
0
1
7
1,
4
1
7
,
4
3
7
1,
0
1
5
,
2
1
4
1,
0
2
5
,
2
9
9
1,
0
3
5
,
4
8
5
1,
0
4
5
,
7
7
3
1,
0
5
6
,
1
6
4
1,
0
6
6
,
6
5
9
1,
0
7
7
,
2
5
9
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
70
7
,
0
0
0
44
8
,
6
1
2
68
9
,
7
6
7
45
2
,
4
6
5
45
6
,
3
5
6
46
0
,
2
8
6
46
4
,
2
5
6
46
8
,
2
6
5
47
2
,
3
1
4
47
6
,
4
0
4
Gr
a
n
t
s
11
,
1
4
4
13
3
,
9
6
9
4,
6
4
4
1
2
6
,
7
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
St
a
t
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
74
5
,
9
4
2
72
5
,
8
8
8
75
2
,
4
2
6
74
8
,
9
2
1
74
6
,
3
2
5
75
3
,
8
5
6
76
1
,
5
2
0
76
9
,
3
2
0
77
7
,
2
5
9
78
5
,
3
3
9
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1,
3
2
3
,
3
2
0
1,
3
4
8
,
7
4
3
1,
3
5
6
,
7
0
5
13
0
,
9
1
5
13
4
,
1
8
8
13
7
,
5
4
2
14
0
,
9
8
1
14
4
,
5
0
5
14
8
,
1
1
8
15
1
,
8
2
1
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1,
3
2
2
,
0
0
9
1,
3
1
8
,
7
7
3
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
8
8
,
9
3
5
1,
4
2
3
,
6
5
9
1,
4
5
9
,
2
5
0
1,
4
9
5
,
7
3
2
1,
5
3
3
,
1
2
5
1,
5
7
1
,
4
5
3
Ch
g
s
.
f
o
r
G
o
o
d
s
&
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
2,
7
7
8
,
1
5
4
2,
3
0
7
,
3
9
0
3,
2
0
0
,
1
9
4
2,
7
7
6
,
4
7
2
2,
8
3
2
,
3
9
2
2,
8
9
0
,
0
3
9
2,
9
4
9
,
4
3
8
3,
0
1
0
,
6
1
9
3,
0
7
3
,
6
1
0
3,
1
3
8
,
4
4
4
Fi
n
e
s
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
s
59
2
,
5
0
0
67
4
,
6
3
3
64
0
,
3
0
0
63
0
,
1
5
1
64
5
,
9
0
4
66
2
,
0
5
2
67
8
,
6
0
3
69
5
,
5
6
8
71
2
,
9
5
8
73
0
,
7
8
1
Mi
s
c
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
58
0
,
1
9
3
53
1
,
9
3
9
52
1
,
2
7
6
49
6
,
0
6
7
46
5
,
3
8
4
45
5
,
1
6
4
45
5
,
3
0
3
46
0
,
7
5
4
46
8
,
9
9
4
47
8
,
7
6
7
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
34
,
8
1
6
,
0
4
2
33
,
5
5
5
,
1
3
2
35
,
8
0
6
,
5
3
1
32
,
6
6
7
,
5
6
4
33
,
2
4
7
,
5
7
9
33
,
9
2
0
,
8
4
1
34
,
7
0
6
,
1
2
1
35
,
5
2
8
,
7
5
7
36
,
3
7
0
,
4
8
2
37
,
2
3
9
,
5
4
0
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
-2
.
6
%
1
.
8
%
2
.
0
%
2
.
3
%
2
.
4
%
2
.
4
%
2
.
4
%
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
35
,
7
9
3
,
9
9
3
35
,
0
5
2
,
9
9
2
37
,
0
7
9
,
7
9
6
35
,
0
1
7
,
3
7
1
35
,
6
6
7
,
9
8
0
35
,
2
7
4
,
6
9
4
34
,
0
7
0
,
6
4
2
32
,
3
9
1
,
3
4
7
30
,
1
3
1
,
3
7
2
27
,
3
9
9
,
3
6
5
20
0
9
2
0
0
9
A
c
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
b
y
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
Bu
d
g
e
t
@
1
/
2
0
/
1
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
W
a
g
e
s
18
,
0
0
4
,
0
8
8
17
,
7
5
6
,
5
9
2
18
,
9
2
9
,
2
7
7
12
,
4
7
7
,
6
0
4
13
,
2
9
5
,
6
9
2
13
,
7
5
7
,
2
8
6
14
,
2
3
5
,
0
1
5
14
,
7
2
9
,
4
4
6
15
,
2
4
1
,
1
6
6
15
,
7
7
0
,
7
8
2
Be
n
e
f
i
t
s
5,
9
5
8
,
6
2
0
5,
4
6
5
,
5
7
0
6,
0
9
4
,
4
4
4
4,
2
7
3
,
7
2
4
4,
7
2
7
,
4
1
3
5,
0
8
6
,
5
5
6
5,
4
7
6
,
5
3
0
5,
9
0
0
,
2
1
3
6,
3
6
0
,
7
6
7
6,
8
6
1
,
6
6
7
Su
p
p
l
i
e
s
70
6
,
8
9
0
51
6
,
5
6
9
70
3
,
9
6
6
57
2
,
0
6
6
58
6
,
3
6
8
60
1
,
0
2
7
61
6
,
0
5
3
63
1
,
4
5
4
64
7
,
2
4
0
66
3
,
4
2
1
i
Se
r
v
i ce
s
3,
8
3
9
,
8
8
6
3,
6
6
8
,
1
8
8
3,
8
5
4
,
7
5
5
9,
8
0
2
,
1
0
7
10
,
0
6
1
,
2
8
6 1
0
,
3
3
0
,
3
4
2 1
0
,
6
0
9
,
8
5
1
10
,
9
0
0
,
4
4
0 1
1
,
2
0
2
,
7
8
3
11
,
5
1
7
,
6
1
4
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
2,
0
3
8
,
5
5
5
1,
8
0
9
,
1
4
7
2,
0
9
4
,
0
8
3
1,
7
5
7
,
6
9
0
1,
8
2
7
,
9
2
1
2,
2
5
4
,
6
4
5
2,
3
3
9
,
9
9
4
2,
4
2
8
,
9
2
6
2,
5
2
1
,
6
0
3
2,
6
1
8
,
1
9
5
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
40
,
0
0
0
41
,
6
4
3
30
,
0
0
0
65
,
9
5
0
67
,
5
9
8
69
,
2
8
8
71
,
0
2
0
72
,
7
9
6
74
,
6
1
6
76,481
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
1,
4
1
5
,
8
1
7
1,
4
1
6
,
1
5
4
1,
4
2
3
,
9
5
1
1,
4
2
3
,
9
5
1
1,
4
2
9
,
4
3
9
1,
4
4
5
,
9
5
6
1,
4
4
6
,
9
2
2
1,
4
7
5
,
9
7
5
1,
3
8
2
,
6
5
8
1,
4
0
4
,
5
0
6
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
1,
3
9
6
,
1
1
1
1,
2
3
9
,
3
2
0
1,
4
8
6
,
9
7
0
1,
3
2
1
,
6
8
7
1,
4
0
5
,
4
6
4
1,
4
4
1
,
4
0
0
1,
4
7
8
,
3
0
0
1,
5
4
6
,
1
9
0
1,
5
8
5
,
0
9
7
1,
6
2
5
,
0
4
8
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
1,
1
2
0
,
7
6
1
79
0
,
0
0
2
1,
1
5
1
,
3
6
2
90
2
,
1
9
1
91
2
,
9
4
5
92
3
,
6
7
3
93
4
,
3
6
7
94
5
,
0
1
8
95
5
,
6
1
8
96
6
,
1
5
7
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
34
,
5
2
0
,
7
2
8
32
,
7
0
3
,
1
8
6
35
,
7
6
8
,
8
0
8
32
,
5
9
6
,
9
7
0
34
,
3
1
4
,
1
2
7
35
,
9
1
0
,
1
7
3
37
,
2
0
8
,
0
5
2
38
,
6
3
0
,
4
5
7
39
,
9
7
1
,
5
4
7
41
,
5
0
3
,
8
7
1
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
1,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
2
,
3
4
9
,
8
0
7
1
,
3
1
0
,
9
8
8
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
1
,
3
5
3
,
8
5
3
(6
3
5
,
4
7
9
)
(
3
,
1
3
7
,
4
1
0
)
(
6
,
2
3
9
,
1
1
0
)
(
9
,
8
4
0
,
1
7
5
)
(
1
4
,
1
0
4
,
5
0
6
)
Ta
r
g
e
t
E
n
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
1
)
2,
8
7
6
,
7
2
7
2
,
7
2
5
,
2
6
5
2
,
9
8
0
,
7
3
4
2
,
7
1
6
,
4
1
4
2
,
8
5
9
,
5
1
1
2
,
9
9
2
,
5
1
4
3
,
1
0
0
,
6
7
1
3
,
2
1
9
,
2
0
5
3
,
3
3
0
,
9
6
2
3
,
4
5
8
,
6
5
6
(1
)
G
F
O
A
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
1
m
o
n
t
h
o
f
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
8
of
30
4
Ho
w
W
e
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
Ho
w
We
Op
e
r
a
t
e
•
Th
i
s
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
•
Th
i
s
ha
s
be
e
n
th
e
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
fr
o
m
w
h
i
c
h
b
u
d
g
e
t
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
cr
e
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
y
y
e
a
r
s
.
•
N
o
w
i
s
n
o
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
t
o
r
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
t
h
e
wh
e
e
l
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
9
of
30
4
20
1
1
20
1
1
•
As
y
o
u
c
a
n
s
e
e
2
0
1
1
i
s
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
y
e
a
r
As
yo
u
ca
n
se
e
,
20
1
1
is
th
e
la
s
t
ye
a
r
sh
o
w
i
n
g
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
c
a
s
h
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
.
W
e
g
o
in
t
o
a
d
e
f
i
c
i
t
i
n
2
0
1
2
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
e
f
i
c
i
t
s
p
i
r
a
l
s
in
t
o
a de
f
i
c
i
t
in
20
1
2
an
d
th
e
de
f
i
c
i
t
spirals
do
w
n
h
i
l
l
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
r
e
.
•
C
l
e
a
r
l
y
w
e
n
e
e
d
m
o
r
e
c
a
s
h
f
l
o
w
…
.
o
r
w
e
db
d
t
d
t
i
ne
e
d b u d ge
t r
e
d uc
ti
on
s
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
0
of
30
4
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
•
Re
v
e
n
u
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
a
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
….
.
ar
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
at
1.
8
%
i
n
2
0
1
1
.
•
Ea
c
h
y
e
a
r
t
h
e
r
e
a
f
t
e
r
s
h
o
w
s
m
o
d
e
s
t
•
Ea
c
h
ye
a
r
th
e
r
e
a
f
t
e
r
,
sh
o
w
s
mo
d
e
s
t
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
t
o
a
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
2
.
4
%
i
n
2
0
1
6
Ei
jtdt
•
E xp
e
n
s
e
i nc
r
e
a
s
e
s
…
.
.
a
r
e
p
r
o
j ec
t e d a t
4.
8
%
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
l
a
b
o
r
a
n
d
a
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
it
c it
y
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
1
of
30
4
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
As
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
•
I
h
a
v
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
y
o
u
r
p
a
c
k
e
t
a
l
l
•
I ha
v
e
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
in
yo
u
r
pa
c
k
e
t
all
th
e
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
a
n
d
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
as
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
K
e
e
p
i
n
m
i
n
d
t
h
a
t
ev
e
n
l
a
r
g
e
a
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
ev
e
n
la
r
g
e
ad
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
in
th
e
s
e
as
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
o
n
l
y
a
fd
l
l
f
i
/
d
f ew
d o ll
ar
s
o
f i nc
r
e
a
s
e
/d
ec
r
e
a
s
e
s
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
2
of
30
4
20
1
1
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
20
1
1
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
bu
d
g
e
t
•
I
c
a
n
g
i
v
e
y
o
u
a
b
u
d
g
e
t
t
h
a
t
s
h
o
w
s
•
I ca
n
gi
v
e
yo
u
a bu
d
g
e
t
th
a
t
sh
o
w
s
20
1
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
th
t
l
i
l
l
th
a t a
l ev
y
w
il
l
p
a
s
s
.
•A
l
e
v
y i
n
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
$
3
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
y
al
l
o
w
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
d
a
y
’
s
se
r
v
i
c
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
1
3
se
r
v
i
c
e
le
v
e
l
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
20
1
3
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
3
of
30
4
OR OR
….
.
•
I
c
a
n
m
a
k
e
$
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
n
b
u
d
g
e
t
c
u
t
s
t
h
a
t
I ca
n
ma
k
e
$1
,00
0
,00
0
in
bu
d
g
e
t
cu
t
s
that
as
s
u
m
e
s
a
l
e
v
y
w
i
l
l
f
a
i
l
.
•
W
h
i
c
h
o
n
l
y
t
a
k
e
s
u
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
1
2
•
I
f
t
h
a
t
i
s
y ou
r
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
, I
w
e
l
c
o
m
e
y our
y,
y
th
o
u
g
h
t
s
o
n
w
h
a
t
y
o
u
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
t
o
c
u
t
fr
o
m
t
h
e
b
u
d
g et
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
4
of
30
4
Co
u
n
c
i
l
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
•
S
o
m
e
t
i
m
e
a
g o
I
a
s
k
e
d
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
P
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
t
o
g
ap
p
o
i
n
t
t
w
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
o
n
m
y
bu
d
g
e
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
e
a
m
.
•
A
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
y
o
u
r
p
a
c
k
e
t
i
s
a
2
0
1
1
B
u
d
g
e
t
Ca
l
e
n
d
a
r
f
o
r
S
t
a
f
f
Ca
l
e
n
d
a
r
fo
r
St
a
f
f
.
•
Yo
u
c
a
n
s
e
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
w
e
e
k
o
f
A
u
g
u
s
t
w
i
l
l
•
Yo
u
ca
n
se
e
th
a
t
th
e
se
c
o
n
d
we
e
k
of
Au
g
u
s
t
will
be
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
o
s
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
ne
e
d
e
d
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
5
of
30
4
Cl
e
a
r
l
y
a
n
e
e
d
Cl
e
a
r
l
y
a ne
e
d
…
•
Th
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
d
o
u
b
t
i
n
m
y
m
i
n
d
t
h
a
t
•
Th
e
r
e
is
no
do
u
b
t
in
my
mi
n
d
that
th
e
r
e
i
s
a
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
a
l
e
v
y
o
r
dr
a
s
t
i
c
b
u
d
g
e
t
c
u
t
s
.
•
T
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
h
a
s
a
n
o
pp
or
t
u
n
i
t
y to
pp
y
pu
l
l
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
b
u
d
g
e
t
th
a
t
i
s
y
o
u
r
s
a
n
d
y
o
u
r
s
a
l
o
n
e
th
a
t
is
yo
u
r
s
an
d
yo
u
r
s
al
o
n
e
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
6
of
30
4
Yo
u
r
c
a
l
l
Yo
u
r
ca
l
l
…
•
Gi
v
e
u
s
t
h
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
y
o
u
w
o
u
l
d
l
i
k
e
u
s
t
o
Gi
v
e
us
th
e
di
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
yo
u
wo
u
l
d
li
k
e
us to
go
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
b
u
d
g
e
t
.
•
I
f
S
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
I
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
b
u
d
g
e
t
,
w
e
a
r
e
t
i
t
h
t
i
l
l
l
d
i
t
t
d
i
ce
r
t a i n
th
a t y
o
u
w
il
l
m
o
ld
it
t o
y
o
u
r
d es i res
an
y
w
a
y
s
o
w
e
m
a
y
a
s
w
e
l
l
s
a
v
e
e
v
e
r
y
o
n
e
k
so
m
e
w
o
r
k
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
7
of
30
4
Wh
i
c
h
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
Wh
i
c
h
sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
Of
t
h
e
t
w
o
b
u
d
g
e
t
•
Of
th
e
tw
o
bu
d
g
e
t
ch
o
i
c
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
ch
o
i
c
e
s
….
wh
i
c
h
wo
u
l
d
yo
u
p
r
e
f
e
r
w
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
?
yo
u
pr
e
f
e
r
we
cr
e
a
t
e
?
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
8
of
30
4
9 -Ju
n
-10
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
:
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
E
x
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
-
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
Ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
9J
u
n
1
0
Ci
t
y
of
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
:
St
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
Ou
t
l
o
o
k
20
0
9
2
0
0
9
A
c
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
RE
V
E
N
U
E
Bu
d
g
e
t
@
1
/
2
0
/
1
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
97
7
,
9
5
1
1
,
4
9
7
,
8
6
0
1
,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
2
,
3
4
9
,
8
0
7
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
1
,
3
5
3
,
8
5
3
(
6
3
5
,
4
7
9
)
(
3
,
1
3
7
,
4
1
0
)
(
6
,
2
3
9
,
1
1
0
)
(
9
,
8
4
0
,
1
7
5
)
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
1
3
,
9
3
0
,
1
7
4
1
3
,
8
2
8
,
9
0
1
1
4
,
1
6
0
,
0
6
2
1
3
,
7
1
3
,
8
2
5
1
3
,
8
8
1
,
3
9
3
1
4
,
0
4
3
,
1
4
4
1
4
,
2
8
6
,
6
1
2
1
4
,
5
4
1
,
1
5
6
1
4
,
7
8
9
,
9
2
8
1
5
,
0
4
1
,
2
4
5
Re
t
a
i
l
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
5
,
3
6
9
,
9
4
8
4
,
4
1
4
,
8
7
4
5
,
5
1
9
,
9
4
9
4
,
3
6
9
,
8
4
7
4,
5
2
2
,
7
9
2
4,
6
8
1
,
0
8
9
4,
8
4
4
,
9
2
7
5,
0
1
4
,
5
0
0
5,190,007
5,371,658
Ot
h
e
r
S
a
l
e
s
&
U
s
e
T
a
x
66
5
,
9
0
1
54
3
,
7
3
1
66
5
,
9
0
1
54
3
,
7
3
1
59
6
,
7
9
7
65
5
,
1
4
3
71
9
,
2
9
8
78
9
,
8
4
0
867,409
952,707
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
x
5,
1
0
2
,
3
1
4
5,
9
5
3
,
0
2
8
5,
2
2
5
,
3
1
1
6,
0
0
1
,
7
3
0
6,
2
3
9
,
8
3
1
6,
4
0
5
,
7
6
9
6,
5
7
6
,
8
1
2
6,
7
5
3
,
1
4
4
6,934,956
7,122,450
Ot
h
e
r
T
a
x
e
s
29
7
,
5
0
0
30
1
,
6
3
3
29
7
,
5
0
0
30
6
,
4
5
7
31
1
,
9
8
2
31
7
,
6
1
1
32
3
,
3
4
6
32
9
,
1
9
1
335,146
341,213
Li
c
e
n
s
e
s
/
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
/
F
r
a
n
c
h
i
s
e
1,
3
8
9
,
9
4
3
1,
0
2
3
,
0
1
7
1,
4
1
7
,
4
3
7
1,
0
1
5
,
2
1
4
1,
0
2
5
,
2
9
9
1,
0
3
5
,
4
8
5
1,
0
4
5
,
7
7
3
1,
0
5
6
,
1
6
4
1,066,659
1,077,259
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
70
7
,
0
0
0
44
8
,
6
1
2
68
9
,
7
6
7
45
2
,
4
6
5
45
6
,
3
5
6
46
0
,
2
8
6
46
4
,
2
5
6
46
8
,
2
6
5
472,314
476,404
Gr
a
n
t
s
11
,
1
4
4
13
3
,
9
6
9
4,
6
4
4
1
2
6
,
7
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
St
a
t
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
74
5
,
9
4
2
72
5
,
8
8
8
75
2
,
4
2
6
74
8
,
9
2
1
74
6
,
3
2
5
75
3
,
8
5
6
76
1
,
5
2
0
76
9
,
3
2
0
777,259
785,339
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1,
3
2
3
,
3
2
0
1,
3
4
8
,
7
4
3
1,
3
5
6
,
7
0
5
13
0
,
9
1
5
13
4
,
1
8
8
13
7
,
5
4
2
14
0
,
9
8
1
14
4
,
5
0
5
148,118
151,821
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
h
a
r
g
e
s
1,
3
2
2
,
0
0
9
1,
3
1
8
,
7
7
3
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
5
5
,
0
5
9
1,
3
8
8
,
9
3
5
1,
4
2
3
,
6
5
9
1,
4
5
9
,
2
5
0
1,
4
9
5
,
7
3
2
1,533,125
1,571,453
Ch
g
s
.
f
o
r
G
o
o
d
s
&
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
2,
7
7
8
,
1
5
4
2,
3
0
7
,
3
9
0
3,
2
0
0
,
1
9
4
2,
7
7
6
,
4
7
2
2,
8
3
2
,
3
9
2
2,
8
9
0
,
0
3
9
2,
9
4
9
,
4
3
8
3,
0
1
0
,
6
1
9
3,073,610
3,138,444
Fi
n
e
s
&
F
o
r
f
e
i
t
s
59
2
,
5
0
0
67
4
,
6
3
3
64
0
,
3
0
0
63
0
,
1
5
1
64
5
,
9
0
4
66
2
,
0
5
2
67
8
,
6
0
3
69
5
,
5
6
8
712,958
730,781
Mi
s
c
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
58
0
,
1
9
3
53
1
,
9
3
9
52
1
,
2
7
6
49
6
,
0
6
7
46
5
,
3
8
4
45
5
,
1
6
4
45
5
,
3
0
3
46
0
,
7
5
4
468,994
478,767
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
34
,
8
1
6
,
0
4
2
33
,
5
5
5
,
1
3
2
35
,
8
0
6
,
5
3
1
32
,
6
6
7
,
5
6
4
33
,
2
4
7
,
5
7
9
33
,
9
2
0
,
8
4
1
34
,
7
0
6
,
1
2
1
35
,
5
2
8
,
7
5
7
36,370,482
37,239,540
An
n
u
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
G
r
o
w
t
h
-
2
.
6
%
1
.
8
%
2
.
0
%
2
.
3
%
2
.
4
%
2
.
4
%
2
.
4
%
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
35
,
7
9
3
,
9
9
3
35
,
0
5
2
,
9
9
2
37
,
0
7
9
,
7
9
6
35
,
0
1
7
,
3
7
1
35
,
6
6
7
,
9
8
0
35
,
2
7
4
,
6
9
4
34
,
0
7
0
,
6
4
2
32
,
3
9
1
,
3
4
7
30,131,372
27,399,365
20
0
9
2
0
0
9
A
c
t
u
a
l
s
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
b
y
F
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
B
u
d
g
e
t
@
1
/
2
0
/
1
0
B
u
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Sa
l
a
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
W
a
g
e
s
1
8
,
0
0
4
,
0
8
8
1
7
,
7
5
6
,
5
9
2
1
8
,
9
2
9
,
2
7
7
1
2
,
4
7
7
,
6
0
4
1
3
,
2
9
5
,
6
9
2
1
3
,
7
5
7
,
2
8
6
1
4
,
2
3
5
,
0
1
5
1
4
,
7
2
9
,
4
4
6
1
5
,
2
4
1
,
1
6
6
1
5
,
7
7
0
,
7
8
2
Be
n
e
f
i
t
s
5
,
9
5
8
,
6
2
0
5
,
4
6
5
,
5
7
0
6
,
0
9
4
,
4
4
4
4
,
2
7
3
,
7
2
4
4
,
7
2
7
,
4
1
3
5
,
0
8
6
,
5
5
6
5
,
4
7
6
,
5
3
0
5
,
9
0
0
,
2
1
3
6
,
3
6
0
,
7
6
7
6
,
8
6
1
,
6
6
7
Su
p
p
l
i
e
s
7
0
6
,
8
9
0
5
1
6
,
5
6
9
7
0
3
,
9
6
6
5
7
2
,
0
6
6
5
8
6
,
3
6
8
6
0
1
,
0
2
7
6
1
6
,
0
5
3
6
3
1
,
4
5
4
6
4
7
,
2
4
0
6
6
3
,
4
2
1
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
3
,
8
3
9
,
8
8
6
3
,
6
6
8
,
1
8
8
3
,
8
5
4
,
7
5
5
9
,
8
0
2
,
1
0
7
1
0
,
0
6
1
,
2
8
6
1
0
,
3
3
0
,
3
4
2
1
0
,
6
0
9
,
8
5
1
1
0
,
9
0
0
,
4
4
0
1
1
,
2
0
2
,
7
8
3
1
1
,
5
1
7
,
6
1
4
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
'
t
2
,
0
3
8
,
5
5
5
1
,
8
0
9
,
1
4
7
2
,
0
9
4
,
0
8
3
1
,
7
5
7
,
6
9
0
1
,
8
2
7
,
9
2
1
2
,
2
5
4
,
6
4
5
2
,
3
3
9
,
9
9
4
2
,
4
2
8
,
9
2
6
2
,
5
2
1
,
6
0
3
2
,
6
1
8
,
1
9
5
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
4
0
,
0
0
0
4
1
,
6
4
3
3
0
,
0
0
0
6
5
,
9
5
0
6
7
,
5
9
8
6
9
,
2
8
8
7
1
,
0
2
0
7
2
,
7
9
6
7
4
,
6
1
6
7
6
,
4
8
1
Db
S
i
1
4
1
5
8
1
7
1
4
1
6
1
5
4
14
2
3
9
5
1
14
2
3
9
5
1
1
4
2
9
4
3
9
1
4
4
5
9
5
6
14
4
6
9
2
2
14
7
5
9
7
5
1
3
8
2
6
5
8
1
4
0
4
5
0
6
D e b t
S er
v
i ce
1 ,41
5
,81
7
1 ,41
6
,15
4
1 ,42
3
,95
1
1 ,42
3
,95
1
1 ,42
9
,43
9
1 ,44
5
,95
6
1 ,44
6
,92
2
1 ,47
5
,97
5
1 ,382 ,658
1 ,404 ,506
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
1
,
3
9
6
,
1
1
1
1
,
2
3
9
,
3
2
0
1
,
4
8
6
,
9
7
0
1
,
3
2
1
,
6
8
7
1
,
4
0
5
,
4
6
4
1
,
4
4
1
,
4
0
0
1
,
4
7
8
,
3
0
0
1
,
5
4
6
,
1
9
0
1
,
5
8
5
,
0
9
7
1
,
6
2
5
,
0
4
8
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
1
,
1
2
0
,
7
6
1
7
9
0
,
0
0
2
1
,
1
5
1
,
3
6
2
9
0
2
,
1
9
1
9
1
2
,
9
4
5
9
2
3
,
6
7
3
9
3
4
,
3
6
7
9
4
5
,
0
1
8
9
5
5
,
6
1
8
9
6
6
,
1
5
7
To
t
a
l
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
3
4
,
5
2
0
,
7
2
8
3
2
,
7
0
3
,
1
8
6
3
5
,
7
6
8
,
8
0
8
3
2
,
5
9
6
,
9
7
0
3
4
,
3
1
4
,
1
2
7
3
5
,
9
1
0
,
1
7
3
3
7
,
2
0
8
,
0
5
2
3
8
,
6
3
0
,
4
5
7
3
9
,
9
7
1
,
5
4
7
4
1
,
5
0
3
,
8
7
1
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
1,
2
7
3
,
2
6
5
2
,
3
4
9
,
8
0
7
1
,
3
1
0
,
9
8
8
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
1
,
3
5
3
,
8
5
3
(6
3
5
,
4
7
9
)
(
3
,
1
3
7
,
4
1
0
)
(
6
,
2
3
9
,
1
1
0
)
(
9
,
8
4
0
,
1
7
5
)
(
1
4
,
1
0
4
,
5
0
6
)
Ta
r
g
e
t
E
n
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
(
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
)
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
1
)
2,
8
7
6
,
7
2
7
2
,
7
2
5
,
2
6
5
2
,
9
8
0
,
7
3
4
2
,
7
1
6
,
4
1
4
2
,
8
5
9
,
5
1
1
2
,
9
9
2
,
5
1
4
3
,
1
0
0
,
6
7
1
3
,
2
1
9
,
2
0
5
3
,
3
3
0
,
9
6
2
3
,
4
5
8
,
6
5
6
(1
)
G
F
O
A
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
1
m
o
n
t
h
o
f
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
22
9
of
30
4
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
:
T
l
h
U
t
i
l
i
t
1
6
1
9
8
4
$
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
i
n
c
e
1
-
2
5
-
1
0
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
T
e
l
e
p
h
o
n
e
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
1
6
1
,
9
8
4
$
W
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
7
1
,
0
0
0
D
i
r
e
c
t
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
1
2
0
,
6
2
5
In
d
i
r
e
c
t
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
1
,
0
7
3
S
t
a
t
e
G
r
a
n
t
s
3
6
9
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
D
1
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
2
9
,
2
2
0
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
T
B
D
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
S
l
T
t
i
t
6
9
8
4
7
S
a
l
e
s
T
a
x
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
6
9
,
8
4
7
6
0
4
,
1
1
8
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
:
N
a
t
G
a
s
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
(
2
5
4
,
1
0
7
)
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
(
5
5
,
9
6
6
)
R
e
m
o
v
e
F
D
1
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
T
o
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
F
u
n
d
(
5
9
9
,
0
0
0
)
T
o
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
F
u
n
d
(
1
0
0
0
0
0
)
T
o
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
F
u
n
d
(
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
1
,
0
0
9
,
0
7
3
)
N
e
t
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
(
4
0
4
,
9
5
5
)
$
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
8
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
1
0
F
i
l
l
i
n
g
D
e
v
S
v
c
s
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
-
6
m
o
n
t
h
m
i
d
y
e
a
r
h
i
r
e
7
2
,
7
6
2
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
R
e
t
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
0
2
,
3
5
5
O
t
h
e
r
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
1
5
,
1
4
0
V
a
c
a
n
t
P
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
(
D
S
/
M
u
n
i
C
o
u
r
t
)
-
C
o
u
r
t
f
i
l
l
e
d
t
h
e
s
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
f
o
r
e
2
0
1
0
-
s
a
v
i
n
g
s
i
s
n
e
g
a
t
e
d
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
f
r
o
m
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
7
7
,
8
7
4
)
N
e
t
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
E
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(192,383)
$
T
o
t
a
l
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(597,338)
J
a
n
2
5
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
2
0
1
0
W
C
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
3
,017 ,739
,,
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
J
u
n
e
8
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
2
0
1
0
W
C
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
2
,
4
2
0
,
4
0
1
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
0
$
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
23
0
of
30
4
La
b
o
r
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
-
J
u
n
e
8
,
2
0
1
0
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
20
1
0
2
0
1
1
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
20
1
0
2
0
1
1
To
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
F
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
16
,
7
5
1
,
3
2
8
$
1
8
,
0
2
3
,
1
0
5
$
1
,
2
7
1
,
7
7
7
$
7.
6
%
La
b
o
r
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
(4
5
8
,
5
9
5
)
A
v
g
l
a
b
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
f
3
.
5
%
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
0
t
o
2
0
1
1
Be
n
e
f
i
t
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
(4
5
3
,
6
8
9
)
$
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
f
r
o
m
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
(3
5
9
,
4
9
3
)
0
R
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
i
o
r
y
e
a
r
b
u
d
g
e
t
c
u
t
s
-
1
%
u
n
d
e
r
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
,
Va
c
a
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
D
S
a
n
d
c
o
u
r
t
,
R
e
s
t
o
r
e
c
i
t
y
c
l
e
r
k
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
O
t
h
e
r
L
a
b
o
r
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
L
a
b
o
r
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
Bu
d
g
e
t
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Ou
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
O
u
t
l
o
o
k
Outloo k Outloo k Outloo k Outloo k
DR
I
V
E
R
S
U
S
E
D
I
N
F
O
R
E
C
A
S
T
I
N
G
2
0
0
9
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
W
a
g
e
s
6
.
0
0
%
4
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
3
.
5
%
O
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
W
a
g
e
s
4
.
0
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l
4
.
0
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
(1
)
Av
e
r
a
g
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
3.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
M
E
B
T
/
M
E
D
C
R
7.
6
5
%
4
.
0
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
1
2
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
3
.
5
0
%
(2
)
P
E
R
S
8
.
3
1
%
7
.
9
3
%
5
.
3
1
%
7
.
0
0
%
7
.
5
0
%
8
.
0
0
%
8
.
5
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
5
0
%
9
.
5
0
%
9
.
5
0
%
9
.
5
0
%
9
.
5
0
%
(2
)
LE
O
F
F
5
.
4
6
%
5
.
1
8
%
5
.
2
4
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
T
o
t
a
l
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
A
W
C
1
0
.
0
0
%
1
0
.
0
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
1
0
.
5
0
%
D
e
n
t
a
l
A
W
C
4
.
5
0
%
3
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
6
.
0
0
%
V
i
s
i
o
n
A
W
C
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
L
&
I
Es
t
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
9
.
0
0
%
L
i
f
e
&
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
n
s
Es
t
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
De
f
e
r
r
e
d
C
o
m
p
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
0
0
0
%
De
f
e
r
r
e
d
C
o
m
p
0
.00
%
0 .00
%
0
.00
%
0 .00
%
0 .0
0
%
0 .00
%
0 .00
%
0 .00
%
0
.00
%
0 .00%0 .00%0 .00%0 .00%
Un
i
f
o
r
m
s
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
0
.
0
0
%
(1
)
Av
e
r
a
g
e
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
12
.
6
%
6
.
0
%
5
.
9
%
5
.
9
%
5
.
8
%
5
.
8
%
4
.
8
%
4
.
8
%
4
.
8
%
4
.
8
%
O
t
h
e
r
L
a
b
o
r
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
Va
c
a
n
t
P
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
8
0
,
0
0
0
R
e
s
t
o
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
1
1%
U
n
d
e
r
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
33
1
,
4
3
6
R
e
s
t
o
r
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
1
Ci
t
y
C
l
e
r
k
V
a
c
a
n
c
y
6
5
,
2
0
5
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
i
t
y
C
l
e
r
k
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
2
0
1
1
Re
t
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(1
0
2
,
3
5
5
)
M
a
y
o
r
/
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
f
r
o
m
o
t
h
e
r
v
a
c
a
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
(1
4
,
7
9
2
)
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
s
a
v
i
n
g
s
o
n
v
a
c
a
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
3
5
9
,
4
9
4
(1
)
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
s
o
n
l
y
f
a
c
t
o
r
i
n
t
h
e
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
a
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
-
n
o
z
e
r
o
s
(2
)
A
l
l
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
h
e
ch
a
n
g
e
i
n
t
h
e
r
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
r
i
o
r
y
e
a
r
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
b
o
t
h
t
h
e
P
E
R
S
an
d
t
h
e
L
E
O
F
F
r
a
t
e
s
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
h
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
r
a
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
a
t
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
y
e
a
r
.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
23
1
of
30
4
CITY OF EDMONDS 2011 BUDGET
2011 BUDGET CALENDAR
(UPDATED AS OF JUNE 4, 2010)
C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\HINES\DESKTOP\2011 BUDGET SCHEDULE.DOCX
Initial
Date
Revised
Date
Description Team
6/3 Initial meeting to discuss 2011 process and assignments. Lorenzo, Carl, Deb
6/8 Distribute Draft Budget Schedule at Director’s Meeting Lorenzo
6/23 Distribute Employee Budget Worksheets, request return by June 30 Lori
7/9 Update Employee information Lori
7/16 Develop Initial General Fund Revenue Projections Lorenzo
7/16 Develop 2011 Indirect Cost Allocation Matrix Lorenzo, Deb
7/16 Develop 2011 Equipment Rental Rates Deb, Lori
7/16 Request information from WCIA regarding Insurance Lorenzo
7/16 Request information from AWC regarding Medical Insurance Lorenzo
7/16 Request information from Eden regarding annual maintenance fees Lorenzo
7/16 First cut labor budgets Lori
7/16 Update all Debt Service Schedules Deb
7/16 Set up items on Sharepoint
Narratives
Eden Instructions
Budget Schedule
Budget Analysts
2011 One time budget additions
2011 First Cut General Fund Revenue Projections
TBD
7/21 Distribute to Departments
Budget Instructions
Requests for General Fund Revenue Projections (request
review and return by July 30)
Reclassification Requests (Due July 30)
Capital Budgets (request Return by Aug 6)
Baseline Budget (request return by Aug 6)
Decision Packages (request return by Aug 6)
Department Narratives (request return by Aug 6)
Sharepoint
8/2 Review returned revenue projections Lorenzo
8/10 Finance Committee
Reclassification requests
L-5 Study
Non Rep Salary Ordinance
Debi H., Lorenzo
8/11 Review decision packages. Begin preparation of budget review
committee notebooks.
Everyone
8/27 Complete Preparation of Budget Review Committee Doc & provide
to departments for review - request comments corrections by 9/8
Everyone
9/15 Complete First Cut of Exhibits Lorenzo
9/15 Complete corrections to Budget Review Committee Doc and
Submission of Budget Review Committee Doc to Mayor.
Everyone
9/21-23 Departmental meetings with budget review team. Lorenzo, Deb
9/28 Receive direction on Decision Packages and begin preparation of
Preliminary Budget document for publication.
Everyone
10/5 Preliminary Budget document to departments for review – request
comments by 10/7
Packet Page 232 of 304
2011 Budget Calendar, Page 2
Initial
Date
Revised
Date
Description Team
10/12 Finance Committee – review of prop tax ordinance Lorenzo
10/12 Preliminary Budget document to printer for publication
10/18 &
25
Publication of Notices. Sandy, Lorenzo
10/19 Mayor’s Message and Presentation of Preliminary Budget to
Council.
Mayor, Lorenzo
10/19 First Draft of Budget Ordinance Lorenzo
10/26 Council Workshop. Mayor, Lorenzo, Deb
11/2 Public Hearing: Revenue Sources including property tax increases Lorenzo
11/2 Public Hearing (#1): 2011 Budget Lorenzo
11/2 Property Tax Resolution and Ordinance Lorenzo
11/9 Finance Committee
Final 2011 Amending Ordinance
Lorenzo
11/16 Public Hearing (#2) 2011 Budget (if nec) and/or Budget Adoption Lorenzo
12/1 Begin final budget preparation. Everyone
12/15 Final budget printed and posted on web. Everyone
Packet Page 233 of 304
AM-3130 9.
Continued Narrative and Potential Action on the Formation of a Levy Committee
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Councilmembers Plunkett and Buckshnis Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Continued narrative and potential action on the formation of a levy committee.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
The Council discussed this subject at the April 20, April 27, May 4, May 18, and May 25 Council
Meetings (minutes attached).
The Finance Committee met and recommended the following: endorsement and staff to make
notice for citizens who wish to be appointed to committee.
Narrative
The Finance Committee would like to ensure that the newly appointed City Council Member will
have a representative and his/her selection shall be requested at the next City Council meeting
after appointment.
The City Council would like to consider allowing the Mayor to appoint one representative
bringing the commission total to 8 (optional) and member will be an alternate.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: April 20 2010 CM
Link: April 27 2010 CM
Link: May 4 2010 CM
Link: May 18 2010 CM
Link: May 25 2010 CM
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 11:38 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/09/2010 01:32 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 09:15 AM APRV
Packet Page 234 of 304
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 06/07/2010 08:48
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 235 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 20, 2010
Page 20
$6,000-$7,000/month on fiber optics with only continued promises it would generate revenue. He viewed
the fiber optics as speculation and did not support the City being in that business.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, proposed the budget include pay raises for employees who provide good service.
He pointed out the primary issue was increases in healthcare insurance premiums for union and non-union
employees. He anticipated the second quarter revenues would be higher.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
PLUNKETT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR ONE HOUR. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested in the future budget cuts comply with the ordinance that states
financials for September 2009 and December 2009 be available on the website. She also suggested a
proforma be available on the website. Mayor Haakenson asked what she considered a proforma.
Councilmember Buckshnis answered the executive summary was a five year proforma. Mayor Haakenson
agreed to have the executive summary posted on the website as well as the December 2009 financials
when they were available.
Councilmember Orvis commented his primary interest during the budget process would be distinguishing
revenues particularly government service fees and parks fees in order to determine each department’s
dependence on fees.
11. COUNCIL REVIEW OF LEVY OPTIONS.
Council President Bernheim announced May 18, 2010 was the deadline for Council action to place a levy
on the August ballot and August 3, 2010 was the deadline for placing a levy on the November ballot.
Council President Bernheim reviewed the history of the Council action with regard to the levy:
April 21, 2009 the Council requested staff prepare two options, 1) a general operations levy, and
2) a dedicated parks/public safety/families option.
The following week the Council took public comment and five people commented.
The next week the Council again took public comment and a couple more people commented.
May 19, 2009 the Council passed a resolution to have some kind of levy in 2009.
June 16, 2009 staff returned with proposed language for only a general operations levy.
June 23, 2009 the Council voted again to reaffirm their commitment to a levy.
July 21, 2009 Councilmember Wilson and he presented a dedicated levy option for parks, public
safety and family/social services.
July 21, 2009 the Council voted unanimously to put a levy option to the people.
July 28, 2009 the Council voted 4-2 to postpone placing a levy o the ballot to 2010.
Since then the Edmonds School District and the Library District levies have passed.
Council President Bernheim explained annual property taxes increases were capped at 1%; however, the
City’s expenses increase by a greater amount. Labor expenses, whether individual salaries or health
benefits or hiring more people, have historically increased by more than 1%/year. He summarized the
City’s budget shortfall was not due to irresponsible spending but because revenues did not keep pace with
expenses. As a result government must periodically ask the voters for tax increases.
Council President Bernheim voiced his support for giving the voters an opportunity to choose whether
their property taxes should increase via a targeted levy that supported parks, the Senior Center,
recreational activities. In 1-2 weeks, he planned to present the Council a variant of the dedicated levy
Councilmember Wilson and he proposed last year in time to take action by May 18.
Packet Page 236 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 20, 2010
Page 21
Councilmember Wilson was discouraged the Council postponed the vote on the levy last year,
anticipating a levy on the November ballot was unlikely to succeed due to national elections that would
highlight the poor state of the economy. It was also unlikely a levy would be placed on the ballot in 2011
as four Councilmembers and the Mayor’s position were up for election. Waiting to place a levy on the
ballot in 2012 would require the closure of a major portion of City government. If City pursued the
purchase of the Skipper’s property, under the current projections, the City would be in the red in second
quarter of 2012 versus the fourth quarter if the property were not purchased. The Council could not
complete the 2011-2012 budget without either closing a portion of City government or proposing a levy.
He anticipated there was little chance the voters would approve a levy unless it was done in August.
However, he found it irresponsible to purchase the Skipper’s property and then ask for a levy.
Councilmember Orvis recalled the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) has shown a willingness to
place an increase in the vehicle license fee on the ballot. He asked whether the TBD would be meeting to
decide when that would be placed on the ballot. Council President Bernheim recalled at their last meeting
the TBD agreed to schedule a follow-up meeting once staff provided a list of priority projects. He agreed
to schedule a TBD meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON,
THAT THE FINANCE COMMITTEE BRING THE COUNCIL TWO OPTIONS BY THE MAY 4
MEETING SO THAT PLACING A LEVY ON THE AUGUST BALLOT COULD BE DISCUSSED.
THE TWO OPTIONS WOULD INCLUDE A TARGETED OPTION AND A GENERAL
OPERATIONS OPTION.
Councilmember Wilson commented it would be a tight timeline although much of the work had been
done. The Finance Committee would need to meet outside the regular schedule and he anticipated the
process would be to coalesce the data that had previously been prepared and work with Mr. Hines to
update the numbers.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested each Councilmember have an understanding of the composition of
the forecasts.
Council President Bernheim encouraged Councilmembers to caucus with each other outside Council
meetings and to review the materials presented by the Citizen Levy Review Committee and the two levy
options presented to the Council in 2009, 1) a general operations levy and 2) a modified general with
provision for police, Senior Center, and other social and family services. Although the actual 2009 budget
numbers had yet to be completed, he assumed they would be similar to those presented last year and
clearly the City’s financial situation was dire, originating from the law that caps property tax increases at
1% unless approved by voters. He did not support delaying politically difficult decisions such as a levy
until the Council had absolute confidence in the financials.
Councilmember Plunkett asked what a targeted levy would fund. Councilmember Peterson suggested the
Council caucus and the Finance Committee prepare options. Councilmember Plunkett expressed concern
with the Finance Committee developing a targeted levy without input from the Council regarding what
they wanted to fund via a levy.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented things had changed significantly since last year with the sale of
the Fire Department and 54 fewer employees. She was uncertain a decision regarding a levy could be
made within one month, noting there also had not been input from the public.
Councilmember Wilson noted Councilmember Buckshnis participated as a citizen on the Levy Review
Committee. The Committee formed eight groups and all eight recommended proceeding with a levy. As
part of that process, the Council stated several policy positions including that one of the purposes of a
Packet Page 237 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 20, 2010
Page 22
levy would be to build up one month of ending cash balance. Another area of primary interest was
technology. He wanted to focus on public safety and parks. Council President Bernheim wanted to focus
on parks. He suggested the Finance Committee start with the Mayor’s option as the general operations
levy and the modified general as the targeted levy. The Finance Committee should determine the length
of time before another levy would be necessary which would dictate the amount of the levy. He recalled
under last year’s scenario a $3.75 million levy would be required to reach 2014; the removal of Fire
Department would reduce that amount. He recognized the Finance Committee may need to meet outside
the regular schedule to meet the May 4 deadline.
Council President Bernheim questioned whether it was possible to get financial documents that reflected
the City’s future cash flow needs without the Fire Department expenses and whether staff would be
available to assist the Finance Committee before May 4. Mayor Haakenson anticipated the Finance
Committee could readily accumulate the information available to the Levy Review Committee and deduct
the Fire Department expenses. Staff could assist if needed.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked when the December 2009 quarterly financials would be available.
Mayor Haakenson answered when it was completed, it would be provided to the Council. He commented
the numbers would be very similar to the proforma provided to the Council dated March 15, 2010.
Councilmember Plunkett expressed concern with the broadness of the targeted levy. He suggested further
information may be necessary from the Council before May 4. Council President Bernheim advised the
topic was on next week’s and the May 4 agenda.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Ruth Arista, Edmonds, reported 200 people attended the second annual luncheon and Downtown
Edmonds Merchants Fashion Show at the new Yacht Club on April 17 and many of the attendees shopped
in downtown Edmonds after the show. She commended Petra Rousu, Savvy Traveler, and Denise at
Cynderellies Closet, who chaired the event. She echoed Councilmember Wilson’s disappointment that the
Council postponed a levy last year after the Citizen Levy Review Committee recommended a levy. She
was concerned with Council meeting the May deadline for the August ballot and urged Council to work
together. She anticipated citizens would be willing to pay for services and amenities and that a levy could
be successful with the Council’s leadership and community meetings to educate the public regarding the
how the funds would be used and what services would be lost if voters did not approve the levy.
Richard Senderoff, Edmonds, announced via the leadership of Laura Spehar and many others, Edmonds
received its Backyard Wildlife Habitat Certification from the National Wildlife Federation. A celebration
will be held on Saturday at Yost Park from 11:00 – 4:00 coinciding with the Watershed Fun Fest and cake
cutting at 3:00 p.m. He noted the Consent Agenda included a Proclamation in honor of Native Plant
Appreciation Week; as part of that celebration the official opening ceremony for the Willow Creek
Habitat Native Plant Demonstration will occur on Sunday, April 25 from 1:00 - 3:30 with ribbon cutting
at 1:00 and maps to tour local homes with backyard habitats. Edmonds received the Backyard Wildlife
Habitat Certification in less than two years, a short period of time compared to the length of time it has
taken other communities to receive certification.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, reported he attended the Edmonds School District workshop last week where
there was discussion regarding placing a supplementary levy on the August ballot. The consensus at that
meeting was the August ballot was preferable. Next, he reported King County would be making a
decision regarding the Shoreline jail site during the third or fourth quarter this year. He also reported a
citizen group was meeting with Finance Director Lorenzo Hines regarding the City’s finances.
Packet Page 238 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 27, 2010
Page 25
12. PUBLIC COMMENT ON BUDGET CUTS
Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting.
13. COUNCIL REVIEW OF LEVY OPTIONS
Councilmember Buckshnis reported Mayor Haakenson and she met last Friday to review several issues
including the levy. Although Councilmember Wilson has expressed support for pulling last year’s levy
off the shelf, she preferred to get the fiscal year end, the fourth quarter 2009 and first quarter 2010 and the
General Fund review and form a small committee to review the information and develop levy scenarios
that may include Yost Pool, the Senior Center, etc. The Finance Committee plans to meet on May 3 at
1:00 p.m. in the City Hall Fourtner Room to review the two scenarios that were presented last year and
present two options which may include the “D.J. option” from last year.
Councilmember Wilson clarified he did not have a levy option on the table. He the levy option considered
last year was $3.75 million; last week he noted a lesser amount would be appropriate. He suggested
having further Council review of levy options at Friday’s special Council meeting.
14. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS
Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting.
15. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson asked whether the Council planned to take any action on an appraisal or Level 1
environmental assessment or if they were delaying it until the meeting on Friday. Councilmember
Plunkett responded he needed until Friday to review the materials. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was
interested in at least having the appraisal conducted. Councilmember Orvis suggested the Council move
forward with the appraisal if they accepted the bank’s counter offer. Council President Bernheim
suggested the Council defer action on the due diligence contracts until Friday’s Council meeting.
16. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Peterson thanked Mayor Haakenson for attending the Edmonds Center for the Arts’
fundraising event, Center Stage. The event was a great success and despite the economic times, the
ECA’s operations budget looks great, the result of a great staff and great performances. He encouraged
the public to view the schedule of events at EC4arts.org.
Councilmember Buckshnis announced the Town Hall meeting Friday, April 30 at Colonial Pantry Family
Restaurant in Firdale from 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. The topic is how citizens envision Edmonds.
Councilmember Wilson provided clarification to the following statements made by Councilmember
Fraley-Monillas in a Guest View column of the April 23 Edmonds Beacon:
Councilmember Wilson was the Council President during the start of our recognized fiscal crisis.
Councilmember Wilson explained he was selected as the Council President January 2009; the
fiscal crisis began in September 2008.
His agenda included hiring a pool consultant for $65,000 to recommend a location for an aquatic
center we couldn’t afford to build while simultaneously cutting funding to seniors and Yost Pool.
Councilmember Wilson explained the Council approved that consultant in April 2008. He
supported the Mayor proposed cuts to Yost Pool in April 2009 and proposed a levy in 2009 to
increase Senior Center funding by approximately $100,000.
Packet Page 239 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 4, 2010
Page 8
Councilmember Wilson observed the fact that General Fund expenditures were 70% of budget three-
quarters of the way through 2009 was due to a $400,000 savings from staff furloughs, not spending
$300,000 in Automobile Fleet Replacement, not spending $50,000 due to funds raised by the community
for Yost Pool, and not filling positions such as the Development Services Director who retired in April
2009. He summarized General Fund expenditures were 70% of budget rather than 75% of budget due to
those cuts. Mayor Haakenson agreed.
8. YEAREND 2009/FIRST QUARTER 2010 BUDGET UPDATE
Finance Director Lorenzo Hines distributed Yearend 2009 and First Quarter 2010 Budget information. He
pointed out the information was not in the format the Council was accustomed to as he was in the process
of producing the final report. This is a potpourri of reports used to create the yearend report. He advised
the final 2009 Yearend Report and 2010 First Quarter would not be complete to his standards until
Friday; he offered to email those reports to the Council.
He referred to an outline of General Fund revenues at yearend 2009 and total General Fund revenues,
noting at the end of 2009, General Fund revenues are slightly above budget. He referred to a section
regarding City departments yearend 2009, explaining the majority of City departments are under budget, a
few were on budget. He pointed out the Engineering function was broken out in Development Services.
Mayor Haakenson summarized Mr. Hines would email Councilmembers the fourth quarter 2009 Report
and the 2010 First Quarter Report by Friday and provide a report to the Finance Committee on May 11.
Mr. Hines referred to the 17-page Expenditure Status Report, explaining the adjusted appropriation for
General Fund expenditures was $34.2 million; actual expenditures were $32.9 million or $1.3 million
under budget for 2009. The next group of reports were directly from the City’s accounting system and
were consistent with those in the quarterly report. There are reports for the Street Fund, Combined
Street/Utility Improvement, Multimodal, Building Maintenance, Municipal Arts, Hotel/Motel, Employee
Parking Permit, Tourism Promotion, REET 2, REET 1, Cemetery Maintenance, Park Construction, etc.
He explained the information provided includes a revenue status report for REET 2 and REET 1 to allow
comparison with the expenditure status report.
Councilmember Wilson requested a report regarding how the rate changes at Yost Pool impacted
attendance and revenue.
9. COUNCIL REVIEW AND DECISION CONCERNING PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT
RESOLUTION FOR 8/17/10 LEVY.
Council President Bernheim explained the deadline for Council action to place a levy on the August ballot
was May 18. He suggested in order to provide adequate time to review the budget, the Council not take
action to place a levy on the August ballot.
Councilmember Wilson recalled the Finance Committee was to provide some options.
Councilmember Orvis asked whether the TBD Board planned to meet to discuss placing a ballot measure
on the September ballot. Council President Bernheim explained the TBD Board was provided a list of
priority projects for various TBD amounts. The Board agreed to review the list and schedule another
meeting in 4-6 weeks to make a decision regarding a ballot measure.
Councilmember Plunkett explained the Finance Committee met yesterday to consider whether to begin
the process with the information developed in 2009 or begin a new process that included the formation of
Packet Page 240 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 4, 2010
Page 9
a commission. The Finance Committee recommended using the real numbers from 2009 that are being
reported now and to form a small commission to consider a levy, not necessarily in the primary or general
election but perhaps as late as February 2011.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented one of the reasons for moving forward with actual numbers is
expenses have changed dramatically from the 2008 numbers that were used to create the 2009 levy due to
the removal of 54 Fire Department employees. Revenues have also changed due to the elimination of the
Esperance and Woodway fire contracts as well as EMS fees. She recommended using the actuals and the
executive forecasts to develop high and low projections for 2015-2017. She also planned to consider
financing a Senior Center, Yost Pool and other mixtures of General Fund and capital funding in a levy.
Councilmember Wilson explained for the 2-3 members of the Council who had not previously voted on a
budget, the process begins essentially now as staff begins to gather information. A Budget Review
Committee comprised of a couple Councilmembers and Department Directors meet in August and Mayor
Haakenson presents his budget in October or earlier. The budget is typically adopted the first week in
December. If a levy is not presented to the voters in August or November, the Council would be voting on
a budget for 2011-2012 that did not include any additional revenue from a levy.
Councilmember Wilson noted Councilmembers agree that by mid-late 2012, the City’s budget would be
in the red. He assured the City’s budget would not go into the red because the 2011-2012 budget Mayor
Haakenson presents will cut large swaths of City services, entire departments. The Council did not have
all the time they might want to have or have as much certainty about the numbers as they might like
because without a levy, it would be necessary to decide whether to cut Yost Pool, close parks or fire cops.
He explained even if the entire Finance and Human Resources Departments were eliminated, it would not
address the budget shortfall nor would it be possible to run the City without those departments.
Councilmember Wilson summarized the Council could argue about how exact the numbers were,
acknowledging his frustration with not having up-to-date numbers. He anticipated the reason was Mr.
Hines wanted to ensure the numbers were exact. He did not think a successful levy would be possible if
the Council purchased the Skipper’s property. If the five Councilmembers who want to purchase the
Skipper’s property also want to be able to run the City, he urged them not to wait for perfection with
regard to the numbers and to begin developing a levy option soon.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recognized Councilmember Wilson’s panic and urgency and the
upcoming budget, commenting she would not be bullied into a levy. She wanted information as well as to
understand what the public wants and to look at the issues before she made a decision regarding what levy
amount was needed.
Councilmember Wilson commented the Council did not always have the luxury of all the time
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas would like. Although he has been a strong advocate for a levy, he would
be hard pressed to support a levy in August or September because he did not believe it would be
successful if the Council purchased the Skipper’s property. He reiterated significant cuts would be
required if a levy were not passed, pointing out if the Council did not take action, Mayor Haakenson
would make the necessary cuts.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas responded Skipper’s was not part of the budget and she did not
appreciate Councilmember Wilson bringing it into the conversation. She stressed the importance of due
diligence and looking at the budget as quickly as possible to make a decision about the levy. She
reiterated she would not be bullied/pushed into a levy without having adequate information. She
recognized Councilmember Wilson was more comfortable with the process because he had been part of
the budget in the past, but all Councilmembers need to understand the budget so that it can be presented to
Packet Page 241 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 4, 2010
Page 10
the citizens. She was less concerned about the numbers Mr. Hines is providing than she was with the
future and whether a levy was necessary, when it would be appropriate to place a levy on the ballot,
whether the TBD planned to have an increase in the vehicle license fee on the ballot, how much the levy
should be, and what items should be included in a levy. She was concerned a levy was being pushed on
the Council without adequate information.
Councilmember Wilson urged Councilmember Fraley-Monillas to be specific about what information she
needed and to ask staff for it. The Finance Committee was asked to consider options and have provided
their recommendation. He suggested Council President Bernheim develop a decision tree for the Council
to identify a process for moving forward. He agreed the process needed to include consideration of
whether a TBD fee would be placed on the ballot, whether the issue of a City Manager form of
government would be on the ballot and what cuts would be made such as closing parks.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reiterated she felt panic was being pushed on the citizens. She favored
reviewing the issue in a methodical manner. She commented it was not Chicken Little and the sky was
not falling at this point and although it may, until the Council got adequate information, she could not
support a levy. She referred to Councilmember Wilson’s 2009 levy proposal, noting it was necessary to
adjust that proposal to reflect current circumstances. She objected to the insinuation that the sky was
falling, that the City was going to fire police, and shutter parks, yet buy property on the waterfront,
finding those statements disingenuous.
Councilmember Wilson objected to Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referring to him as disingenuous,
clarifying he did think the sky was falling; she may have a different opinion. He was panicked because he
did not want to take a vote to fire cops or close parks and envisioned that would be necessary. He
preferred to explain to citizens why a levy was necessary rather than determine which City staff positions
to eliminate. He commented the Skipper’s property was absolutely relevant because if the Council is
buying property, it lends to the perception that the City must have money. If that is the message citizens
hear, regardless of whether it is funded via bonds, REET, parking revenue or whatever, the perception is
the City has money which is counter productive to passing a levy.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City was paying $1.6 million for odor improvements at the
treatment plant. The Council needs to understand the actual budget numbers in order to move forward.
The last two financial quarterlies will be very informative; the 4th quarter 2009 will include revenue from
the Cash for Clunkers program and the 1st Quarter 2010 will reflect the upturn in the economy. She
wanted to obtain the numbers, noting she had identified a person willing to be on the commission that
would help her analyze the executive summary to develop a low, moderate and high projection. With
regard to the Skipper’s property, she clarified that was a capital acquisition; the levy to date is to provide
General Fund revenue for operating, two separate things. She also wanted to consider the possibility of
park acquisitions in a levy.
Councilmember Wilson agreed the Skipper’s property was a capital purchase; however, the funds
discussed for a portion of the purchase, approximately $600,000, could be used for operational purposes.
Those funds were in the General Fund until a few months ago. He did not disagree with any of
Councilmember Buckshnis’ sentiment, and agreed more information was better and that having the
numbers was important but the City was headed into the red. The longer the Council waited, the worse
that situation gets and the more irrelevant the Council becomes because the Mayor will make those
decisions. He anticipated the budget Mayor Haakenson presents in September/October will be horrible
and would cause hundreds of people to urge the Council not to close Yost Pool, close parks, or cut cops
and the Council would be in a very uncomfortable position. He urged the Council to think about how to
fund basic government without a levy.
Packet Page 242 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 4, 2010
Page 11
Regardless of whether the Council purchased the Skipper’s property, and regardless of when a levy was
run unless it was run and approved in August, Mayor Haakenson explained the 2011-2012 budget he
presents will not be pretty. He did not anticipate there was enough time to develop a levy and educate the
public in time for a levy on the August ballot. The 2011-2012 budget he presents on October 1 will reflect
severe budget cuts because projections show the budget in the red in 2012. During every budget cycle, a
five year forecast is prepared. Each time a deficit has been apparent, staff has suggested actions the
Council could take and the Council has been able over the years to approve budget cuts or increase
revenues to delay the deficit. He assured there were no more rabbits to pull out of the hat, it was not panic
nor the sky falling, it was a fact, the City would be in the red in 2012 if something was not done, either
the voters asked to pay more taxes for the services they receive today or he will make the necessary
budget cuts. Budget cuts mean cutting staff and reducing services. He summarized the 2011-2012 budget
he presents will not have the City in the red in 2012 but the budget cuts will be severe.
Councilmember Plunkett commented the budget Mayor Haakenson presents could be augmented by funds
from a levy in November or February if the citizens were willing to support a levy increase. He favored a
methodical approach and educating the public. He anticipated the cuts reflected in the 2011-2012 budget
may generate support for a levy. He concluded there was little impact on the budget of placing a levy on
the November or February ballot.
Mayor Haakenson commented if Councilmembers were awaiting a Council-approved budget before
making a decision on a levy, it would be well into December before the Council adopts the budget.
Waiting until December would delay a levy until mid 2011.
Councilmember Wilson pointed out although the Mayor would present a very ugly budget in October, if a
levy were passed at the November election, the Council would have an opportunity to update the budget
following the election. If a levy is delayed until February, the 2011-2012 budget with significant budget
cuts would need to be passed in December 2010.
Councilmember Plunkett asked if the Council wanted to start the levy process with fresh numbers and
establish a commission.
Councilmember Buckshnis envisioned a commission of seven or fewer people that would operate like an
examination, one-on-one figuring things out. Then all the numbers would be put together and the
commission would provide the Council a recommendation.
Councilmember Orvis agreed with forming a commission.
Councilmember Wilson requested a written proposal before a commission was established. He pointed
out none of this was new; Councilmembers were welcome to meet one-on-one or with others; however
the 7-member commission that is charged with reviewing the budget and developing a levy is the City
Council. He found the formation of a commission a poor idea.
Councilmember Plunkett agreed to present to the Council a written levy commission proposal including
how members would be selected, etc.
10. DISCUSSION REGARDING COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
Councilmember Plunkett explained the packet contained the RCWs with regard to a Council-Manager
form of government. With regard to the timing, Councilmember Plunkett commented it would be unfair
to bring up this issue in the first or second year of a new or reelected Mayor’s term. It would also be
difficult to bring up in the fourth year of a Mayor’s term due to the potential for a Council-Manager form
Packet Page 243 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 2010
Page 6
has been the Council’s policy to respond to audience comments and the Council has been criticized for
not responding. Council President Bernheim requested Council withhold comments until the Council
Comment agenda item or amend the agenda to have Council Comment immediately following Audience
Comment.
City Attorney Scott Snyder responded the Council’s stated adopted policy has been that it does not
respond to public comment although that policy is frequently not followed. He recalled that policy was
established in a resolution adopted by the Council after a group of citizens spoke to the Council
requesting a traffic circle and the Council responded by ordering a traffic circle and the next week another
group of citizens requested the traffic circle be removed. He offered to provide the resolution to the
Council. Councilmember Plunkett agreed to defer to Council policy, suggesting if there was interest in
changing the policy, discussion be scheduled on a future agenda.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council be consistent with regard to their adherence to the
policy.
Councilmember Wilson commented the Council was allowed to have discussion at Council meetings and
it was difficult to have discussions outside meetings. He anticipated the public and the Council would
learn from clarifying questions asked by Councilmember Plunkett. He recognized Council President
Bernheim’s efforts to manage the agenda but did not want to limit discussion just because it was not
explicitly identified on the agenda.
7. COUNCIL REVIEW OF LEVY OPTIONS.
Councilmember Plunkett referred to a question asked by Roger Hertrich at the Finance Committee
meeting regarding debt service paid from Fund 125 and 126, and relaying Finance Director Lorenzo
Hines’ indication that would provide additional information following the committee meeting.
Councilmember Plunkett explained the Finance Committee, comprised of Councilmember Buckshnis and
him, was directed by the Council to, 1) review past work done with regard to a levy or 2) start fresh with
2009 numbers and create a 7-member levy committee. It was the consensus of the Council to proceed
with the second option, use 2009 numbers and work toward a potential levy in late 2010 or early 2011. He
noted that was subject to completing labor negotiations and the austere budget that Mayor Haakenson was
likely to present that would not include a levy increase. He anticipated when the community saw that
budget, there would be a better opportunity to discuss a levy.
He relayed the Finance Committee’s proposal to form a 7-member levy committee, Councilmembers
would each appoint one member and the committee would consider capital targets of opportunity such as
Yost Pool, civic playfields, and the senior center as well as augmenting the General Fund for parks, street
maintenance, information technology, etc. The Council would then hold public hearings and possibly
place a measure on the November or February ballot. He requested the Council endorse the formation of a
levy committee and direct staff to advertise the committee and Councilmembers to appoint their member.
The committee would work in concert with the Finance Committee and the entire Council on capital
targets of opportunity and augmentation of the General Fund.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, THAT THE COUNCIL ENDORSE AND GIVE DIRECTION TO THE CITY STAFF
TO NOTIFY THE CITIZENS AND SEEK INDIVIDUALS WILLING TO SERVE ON A LEVY
COMMITTEE.
Councilmember Peterson asked whether members of the levy committee would be appointed by the
Council or the Mayor. Councilmember Plunkett answered each Councilmember would appoint one
member; the committee would initially be six members, subject to appointment of a seventh member.
Packet Page 244 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 2010
Page 7
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether Councilmembers could participate on the committee.
Councilmember Plunkett envisioned Councilmembers could participate as ex-officio members.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed the intent was for Councilmembers to appoint one member and
the Councilmember also participate on the committee as they saw fit. Councilmember Plunkett agreed,
noting Councilmembers would be ex-officio and could not vote. City Attorney Scott Snyder asked
whether the intent was to notice all meetings as public meetings. Councilmember Plunkett agreed the
meetings would be noticed.
Councilmember Wilson recalled the Council discussed at the last meeting having a written proposal for
Council review. Councilmember Plunkett assumed the agenda memo and his narrative were sufficient.
Councilmember Wilson asked whether it was envisioned the committee would provide a recommendation
with regard to when to place a levy on the ballot, noting to place a measure on the November ballot would
require action by August 10. He asked whether that date was likely with the proposed process.
Councilmember Plunkett acknowledged there was a slim chance that date could be achieved. He
suggested a Councilmember interested in a November ballot measure would need to identify a different
path as this proposal was unlikely to result in a November ballot measure.
Councilmember Wilson asked how the proposed process and the work of the committee would not be
repetitive of the work being done by the Council and conversations with citizens. Councilmember
Plunkett anticipated it would provide additional information, augment existing discussions, draw
conclusions and be a stimulus to the Council. Councilmember Wilson asked if the committee would be
staffed by the Finance Department or Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman, assuming the
committee would have questions about numbers, finances, and budget-related issues. Councilmember
Plunkett answered the committee would direct their questions to Mr. Hines or the appropriate staff
member. He did not envision staff would attend the committee meetings but envisioned questions would
be relayed to staff. He envisioned the committee’s questions would be similar to the questions Mr. Hines
typically receives from the Council or other citizens.
Councilmember Wilson anticipated the committee would have numerous questions and asked how their
questions could be answered in a timely manner when the Finance Department had a great deal on their
plate. He wanted to avoid the committee being frustrated by an inability to get their questions answered in
a timely manner in order to provide the Council a recommendation in a timely manner. Mayor Haakenson
answered the burden on Finance staff would soon be reduced as they have completed the 4th quarter 2009
report and the 1st quarter 2010 report and the audit would soon be complete. Finance will soon begin the
2011-2012 budget process which would allow them to address the committee questions.
Councilmember Peterson expressed concern that a six member Council appointing a six member
committee would add little to the breadth of the discussion. He compared that to the 17 member
Economic Development Commission and last year’s 60+ member Levy Review Committee. He noted the
EDC was a very dynamic group of individuals who were able to spread the work around and brainstorm
and he questioned the ability for a six member committee to do the same. He feared the public would
think the Council was handing the responsibility off to a committee because they were not ready to get
their own hands dirty. He questioned relying on the recommendation of a six member committee when it
was the elected officials’ responsibility to make that decision. Councilmember Plunkett responded the
committee’s influence would only be a factor in the process. He envisioned the committee would work
along with the Council as they reviewed the budget and would receive the same information the Council
received and would be a sounding board regarding augmentation of general operating funds. He assured
they would not be a substitute for the Council and envisioned the committee would be beneficial and
provide additional information for the Council to consider.
Packet Page 245 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 2010
Page 8
Mayor Haakenson commented if it was anticipated the committee would work side-by-side with the
Council as they worked through the budget process, they would not begin work until October 1 when he
presented a budget to the Council.
Councilmember Wilson recalled a few weeks ago there appeared to be some division between
Councilmember Plunkett and Councilmember Buckshnis, the members of the Finance Committee.
Councilmember Plunkett responded this proposal was the consensus of the Finance Committee and he
supported it.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked why the proposal was for each Councilmember to appoint only
one person rather than two or three. Councilmember Plunkett responded his intent was to keep the group
small. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how members were appointed to the 2009 Levy Review
Committee. Councilmember Wilson responded all applicants were appointed to the committee and the
deadline for submission was even extended to the start of the first meeting. Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas observed a levy committee would be of some benefit to the Council.
Council President Bernheim asked whether the reference to staff was Ms. Spellman and the City Council
would coordinate the committee, organizing meetings, etc. and it would not be a burden on the Mayor’s
office or Finance Department. Councilmember Plunkett advised announcements would be published by
the City Clerk. He envisioned the committee would organize themselves, take minutes, conduct meetings,
invite the public to participate, etc. Prior to the Mayor’s presentation of the budget in October, the
committee could hear about issues such as information technology, street maintenance, capital targets of
opportunity, etc.
Councilmember Peterson inquired about the deadline to place a measure on the February 2011 ballot. City
Clerk Sandy Chase advised it was December 22, 2010.
Councilmember Wilson commented this was one avenue to get the Council to placing a levy before the
voters; however, this proposal had not been thought through well enough for him to support it. For
example, Ms. Spellman did not have enough access to financial data to support the committee and there
was clearly a need to rely on information from Directors. He recalled the Revenue Committee met with
Directors and the Mayor at least 20 times for 1½ hours each time beginning in November 2009. The 63
members of the Levy Review Committee met three hours a night for four weeks, approximately a ten
month process. Following those meetings, the Council unanimously agreed to place a levy on the ballot
and then in August decided not to pursue a levy in 2009. He did not anticipate the same result could be
accomplished in a timely manner with a 6-7 member committee supported only by Ms. Spellman.
Councilmember Wilson did not support the proposed committee format and recognizing it was the
Council’s responsibility to be the levy review committee, offered the following alternative: the Council
meet in a work group format every Thursday for as long as it takes to specifically discuss the budget and a
levy and to take public comment. He did not envision a committee could reach a recommendation by
November; however, it was possible the Council could.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas advised she would support the proposed process, expressing her interest
in having as much public input as possible. She envisioned a process conducted by the Council would
shut the public out of the process. She envisioned even with a Council-based process, a representative of
the Finance Department would need to attend those meetings.
Councilmember Plunkett observed the Finance Committee’s proposal was a citizen committee working
toward a citizen vote. He was willing to consider Councilmember Wilson’s suggestion later this summer.
Packet Page 246 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 18, 2010
Page 9
Councilmember Peterson pointed out the Council was a citizens committee; Councilmembers were
citizens elected by the citizens. The advantage to Councilmember Wilson’s suggestion for the Council to
meet in Council Chambers on Thursdays would be an open public meeting which would add to the
transparency versus 6-7 citizens meeting in the Fourtner or Brackett Room of City Hall. He pointed out
Councilmembers would pay the same tax increase if a levy were approved by the voters. He did not
support the process proposed by the Finance Committee.
Councilmember Wilson suggested the Council begin meeting on Thursday, May 27 and rather than a
laborious application process when Councilmembers likely knew who they would appoint, each
Councilmember appoint one member at the May 27 meeting. The result would be a 12 member group, 14
after a new Councilmember is appointed and he/she appoints their committee member, plus the Mayor.
Councilmember Plunkett responded he liked the idea but preferred to wait until the other Finance
Committee member, Councilmember Buckshnis, could participate in the discussion. He suggested
deferring a decision until Councilmember Buckshnis returned.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO DEFER THE MATTER TO THE COUNCIL
PRESIDENT TO BRING BACK ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA NEXT WEEK SUBJECT TO
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS’ PARTICIPATION IN THE DISCUSSION.
Councilmember Wilson pointed out not all Councilmembers would be present until June 15. He asked
Council President Bernheim’s preference with regard to a combined Council/six person group. Council
President Bernheim supported the concept of an advisory group and was agreeable to deferring a decision
until Councilmember Buckshnis returned. He indicated his willingness to schedule Thursday Council
meetings but would not promise to attend all the meetings.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. UPDATE ON SUBDIVISION REGULATION CODE RE-WRITE PROJECT.
Planner Michael Clugston explained this was part of the overall code rewrite staff had been working on
for the past several years. He explained the topic was proposed to Council Committee last September and
introduced to the Planning Board at their May 12 meeting. He referred to Exhibit 2, the presentation
provided to the Planning Board. The three general outcomes are anticipated from this comprehensive re-
write are:
1) Innovate by including additional flexibility to foster low impact development, distributed energy,
and tree retention while increasing affordable housing options.
2) Balance predictability and flexibility in a subdivision regulation that includes formal and short
plats as well as PRD-type and townhouse design standards for lot creation whether in single or
multifamily zones.
3) Streamline the regulation to make it easier to use and administer.
The rewrite process began in late 2008 when the townhouse subdivision process was questioned by the
Hearing Examiner. Other changes include the Council’s passage of Resolution 1170, Environmental
Principles and Policy and the addition of the Sustainability Element to the Comprehensive Plan. The
intent is to consider the subdivision regulations in a comprehensive manner to integrate as many
sustainability elements as possible and to incorporate the best elements of the PRD process into the
subdivision regulations rather than a parallel PRD process.
The subdivision regulations have been in ECDC 20.75 for over 30 years and although they have been
tweaked over time, they lack the flexibility and the concept of sustainability. The Planning Board has
asked staff to consider the following:
Packet Page 247 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 25, 2010
Page 9
it may have been possible to save the City $1 – $1½ million. Councilmember Buckshnis arrived at that
conclusion via a flawed analysis by totaling expenses that included compensation and not other expenses
incurred by Fire District 1. He suggested if Councilmember Buckshnis audited Fire District 1 costs, she
would find the contract with Fire District 1 was a bargain for Edmonds. Next, he disagreed with
Councilmember Buckshnis’ assertion that $400,000 was removed from the REET fund, commenting she
did not understand the 2009 REET statement. Finally she insulted him with a statement that it was no
wonder he did not get past the primary and speculated he had a problem with intelligent women. He
quoted from an email by Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, “do not waste your time Diane with him, he
still thinks he is on Council as evident by attending every event and meeting possible...you need to
consider his age and his need to remain involved no matter if he is correct or not. Kind of sad.” Mr.
Wambolt invited the public to email him at RRWambolt@msn.com to read the emails.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, reported today’s Lake Ballinger Forum meeting was cancelled. The next
meeting is scheduled for June 22 at 2:00 p.m. in Mountlake Terrace. Next, he reported 32%-35% of
Edmonds residents were seniors. The City needs to provide services for both seniors and the younger
generation.
Don Hall, Edmonds, referred to Agenda Item 7, Formation of a Levy Committee, commenting the
Council had already formed a levy committee, the 60+ member Levy Review Committee that met last
year. The discussion regarding the levy was simply a continuation of those people’s thoughts. He
acknowledged that although the numbers may have changed, he doubted the conclusion had changed –the
City needs a levy. The elected Councilmembers were the bottom line and needed to make the decision
regarding a levy. There was not enough time to form committees, gather information and report to the
Council. He supported Councilmember Wilson’s suggestion for the Council to meet every Thursday and
to involve the public during those meetings. He urged the Council to get on with it and do what they had
to do to get a levy passed.
Ray Martin, Edmonds, asked whether the increase in the Mayor’s salary had been resolved. He was
informed the Council had not approved a salary increase for the Council or Mayor. He commended
Councilmember Orvis, a fine gentleman, an honest, straight shooter with a personal code of honor who
was true to himself. He was saddened to learn Councilmember Orvis had been accused of assaulting his
son and was insulted when he learned Mayor Haakenson and Councilmember Wilson had recommended
he resign. He noted Councilmember Orvis was subsequently acquitted of the charges.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, echoed Mr. Martin’s concern with Mayor Haakenson and Councilmember
Wilson’s request that Councilmember Orvis resign. Next, he referred to his comments at that May 18
Council meeting that building permits were down 58% and plan check fees were down 42%, noting the
meeting minutes did not reflect his comment that the number of employees had not been reduced
correspondingly. With regard to the Mayor’s salary, he recommended the Council reconsider the method
used to compare the Mayor’s salaries, suggesting neighboring cities such as Mukilteo, Everett and
Mountlake Terrace be used and that the type of revenue each city collected be considered such as sales
tax versus property tax. He suggested the Council instruct staff to develop a new policy for comparing
salaries. He anticipated the employees who took furloughs during the last year would not appreciate the
Mayor receiving a pay increase.
7. CONTINUED DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON THE FORMATION OF A LEVY
COMMITTEE.
Councilmember Plunkett explained this was a continued discussion from last week regarding the
formation of a 7-member levy committee comprised of a member appointed by each Councilmember. He
explained Mayor Haakenson would be presenting a very bare-boned budget in October, a budget that did
Packet Page 248 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 25, 2010
Page 10
not assume a levy increase. The Finance Committee proposes the levy committee consider the following,
1) augmentation of the General Fund, 2) capital targets of opportunity, 3) take public comment, and 4)
receive additional direction from the Council as information is developed and presented to the levy
committee. The intent would be a levy in February 2011 with the outside possibility of a levy in
November 2010. He explained Councilmembers were welcome to meet with the committee. He supported
the Finance Committee’s original recommendation, to form a 7-member levy committee.
COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
THAT STAFF MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THE COUNCIL IS FORMING A LEVY
COMMITTEE MADE UP OF SEVEN PEOPLE, EACH CHOSEN BY ONE COUNCILMEMBER.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported she watched last week’s meeting on television and wanted to respond
to the issues raised by Councilmember Wilson. She pointed out Consent Agenda Item E changed the
budget from a two-year budget to a one-year budget. In an effort to compare and contrast the proposed
levy committee to last year’s 60+ member levy review committee, she acknowledged the hours
Councilmember Wilson spent organizing information that was presented to the committee. She remarked
whenever there was a revenue issue, there was a corresponding expense issue; because revenues have
declined, expenses must also be reduced. She envisioned this levy committee as a citizen-friendly
committee similar to the committee used by Redmond and Portland, Oregon. She envisioned questions
such as were raised last week about the attorney’s fees could be investigated by this committee. Rather
than a tour of the City’s operations that was provided to last year’s levy review committee, she envisioned
this committee would be interactive and educate citizens and look at salaries of non-union employees
compared to cities close to Edmonds and cities with a similar tax structure. The levy committee would
consider the future of Yost Pool and the Senior Center. She concluded the committee needed to consider a
variety of issues and it was necessary to take time to investigate revenues and expenses. She commented
the committee could be more than 7 people if others wanted to help, comparing it to the Economic
Development Committee that had 17 members who met in subcommittees.
Councilmember Wilson commented the model used for last year’s levy review committee was a model
used by other cities such as Lake Forest Park. He cautioned the Council not to underestimate the amount
of time a levy committee takes, noting someone needed to be responsible for guiding the conversation. A
levy committee would require some structure and whoever led the committee needed to be willing to put
in the time. He did not support the motion, reiterating the Council was the committee and it was the
Council’s responsibility to make the decisions. If the Council needed additional information, it was their
responsibility to ask for it, not the citizens, particularly when no structure had been established for
obtaining information. He recalled an ordinance was passed to form both last year’s levy review
committee and the Economic Development Committee, thereby establishing a clear structure.
Councilmember Wilson pointed out of the items Councilmembers Plunkett and Buckshnis identified for
the levy committee to discuss, none of them solved the revenue problem. He agreed discussing Yost Pool
and the Senior Center were important; however, it did not address the operational shortfall. Although it
was worthwhile to discuss changing the salary compensation policy, it did not address the operational
shortfall. He agreed with taking public comment, noting that also did not address the operational shortfall.
He summarized none of the rationales identified for forming the levy committee addressed the operational
shortfall. He agreed with increased transparency, better reporting of financial data, and forecasting best
case/worst case scenario, however, none of that addressed the operational shortfall.
If the intent was a levy committee, Council President Pro Tem Peterson questioned why the committee
would be discussing salaries and overtime, noting those were topics more appropriately discussed by a
budget committee. He recalled during last year’s Council retreat, the Council discussed overtime versus
salaries and it was discussed as background information by last year’s levy review committee. He agreed
Packet Page 249 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 25, 2010
Page 11
attorneys’ fees and consultants’ fees were important budget discussions but did not relate to a levy.
Recognizing that the timeframe for formulating a levy and placing it on the ballot was rapidly shrinking,
he was hesitant to add another layer of bureaucracy when the Council itself was an excellent committee to
make those decisions. For those reasons as well as the lack of clarity regarding the structure of the levy
committee, he did not support the motion. For example, Councilmember Plunkett’s motion stated it would
be a seven member committee; Councilmember Buckshnis said the committee could be larger. He
acknowledged the need to discuss both revenues and expenses but did not see how talking about salaries
and overtime in the Police Department would solve the City’s overarching financial issues.
Councilmember Plunkett commented his motion was to establish a committee of seven people. He
assumed Councilmember Buckshnis meant other people could participate; the committee would be seven
people. He pointed out one of the purposes of the levy committee was augmenting the General Fund
budget which did address the shortfall. He anticipated the budget Mayor Haakenson will present in
October would need to be augmented, likely via a levy. He disagreed with Council President Pro Tem
Peterson, commenting he had not yet reached the conclusion that a levy was needed. He acknowledged
the Council took votes on a levy last year, but in the end he did not support moving forward with a levy.
He did not support moving forward with a levy now until labor negotiations had been completed, noting
labor was 65-70% of the City’s budget. He questioned how the Council could recommend a budget when
65-70% of the budget was undetermined. He was unable to support a levy until he had an opportunity to
review a no levy increase budget and learn what may need to be augmented and until he had a better
understanding of future labor costs. In the meantime, the levy committee could review the issues and
provide new perspective and new ideas. He acknowledged the ultimate decision with regard to a levy was
made by the Council. He did not anticipate a levy committee would adversely affect the process and
would in fact provide more information.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was perplexed by the comment that salaries and overtime were not part
of the levy decision-making process. Because salaries were such a major portion of the City’s budget, she
did not anticipate being able to formulate a levy until negotiations had been concluded because that
process would identify how much money was needed. She envisioned part of the levy committee’s charge
would be to determine what to spend money on and what levy monies were needed for. She was
perplexed by the comments against forming a levy committee.
To Mr. Hall’s comments regarding the previous levy committee, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed
out things had changed dramatically since the levy review committee began their work. She recognized
that all but one of the levy review committee subcommittees were in favor of a levy. However, the
Council chose not to place a levy on the ballot at that time. The situation has now changed again and a
levy committee was needed to consider what things could be funded via a levy. She disagreed with those
who felt last year’s levy review committee resulted in adequate community input. She concluded there
was time for a levy committee to review the issues. She was wary of preparing a levy prior to the
completion of labor negotiations, fearing without that information the levy amount could either be too
much or too little. She recognized the concern with a levy committee holding up the process, commenting
what was delaying the process was the upcoming labor negotiations.
Councilmember Buckshnis clarified the reason she wanted the levy committee to discuss staffing and
overtime was the City spent $1.2 million in overtime for Police and Fire last year. The 2010 budget
includes two new positions in the Police Department. Her goal was to understand whether the overtime
was necessary or whether a third person should be hired in the Police Department. She summarized the
levy committee would seek answers to these and other questions. She pointed out responses from finance
staff has been slower than in the past; for example staff has not responded to a question she asked in
March regarding $400,000 in REET that was taken out to bring the forecast in line. She summarized the
levy committee was about citizen involvement, understanding the City’s finances and educating citizens.
Packet Page 250 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 25, 2010
Page 12
Council President Pro Tem Peterson agreed with the importance of getting numbers, having a better
understanding and having financial information available on the City’s website. He recalled one of the
advantages of last year’s 60+ member levy review committee was that it was comprised of volunteers
who were not appointed by Councilmembers. One of the disadvantages of each Councilmember
appointing a member to the levy committee was the likelihood that the person each Councilmember
appointed would support his/her viewpoint. He recognized that labor was a major part of the City’s
budget, pointing out the City was basically a service industry and people are necessary to provide those
services. He emphasized that even if the Council held every employee to a 0% increase, a levy would still
be needed. He envisioned whatever increase was agreed to during labor negotiations would not
substantially change the bottom line in a few years.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson disagreed with waiting to complete labor negotiations before making
a decision regarding a levy, envisioning once labor negotiations were completed, something else would
arise. Although he agreed last year to postpone the levy, the Council agreed at that time that a levy was
imperative in the near future, a situation that has not changed and if anything, has worsened due to the
economic climate. He wanted to formulate a levy as quickly and as transparently as possible and did not
support the Council using a levy committee as a filter.
Councilmember Wilson commented this was his third year on the Council and he deals with governments
extensively in his day job. During his first year on the Council he thought he knew much more than he
did. In his third year on Council, he continues to learn that he knows far less than he likes to think he
does. When he was first elected, he voted in a manner that reflected his trust in the more senior
Councilmembers. Although he sometimes disagreed with Councilmember Plunkett as well as with Mayor
Haakenson, he always listened to their viewpoints because they were senior members. With six
Councilmembers in their first term, he recommended Councilmembers be better listeners and for
Councilmember Plunkett and Mayor Haakenson to provide their viewpoint. He acknowledged sometimes
he has had to take votes without complete information and sometimes he did not get answers from staff in
a timely manner. He was confident the seven members of a levy committee would not get their questions
answered any more quickly than a Councilmember. He beseeched Councilmembers Buckshnis and
Fraley-Monillas to work with the Council and for Councilmember Plunkett and Mayor Haakenson to
provide leadership.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented she was listening to the recommendation made by the senior
member of the Council, Councilmember Plunkett. To Council President Pro Tem Peterson’s comment
that a levy would still be necessary even if no raises were provided, she questioned how the amount of the
levy would be determined. She did not understand the rush, recommending the Council take the time
necessary to determine what things should and should not be paid for. For example, there was a problem
if the City was spending over $1 million in overtime rather than filling regular positions as it was cheaper
to fill regular positions and pay benefits than pay overtime. She summarized it was her responsibility as
an elected official to ensure a levy was the right thing for the citizens. She was not willing to approve a
levy without adequate information regarding how much money a levy needed to generate and what a levy
would fund.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson asked whether formal direction would be provided to staff or the
committee regarding a report they would provide. Councilmember Plunkett responded initial direction
was outlined in last week’s packet. While the committee was being formed in the next 2-3 weeks, he
anticipated the Finance Committee in conjunction with the Council could provide direction.
Packet Page 251 of 304
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 25, 2010
Page 13
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to her narrative that identified areas the committee would review. She
recommended citizens who apply for the levy committee understand financial statements, modified
accrual accounting, cash flows and financial modeling if possible and have the ability to conduct research.
Councilmember Plunkett advised the Council would approve the direction given to the committee.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson asked whether there was a timeframe for the committee to gather
information and provide a recommendation. Councilmember Plunkett answered there was not.
Mayor Haakenson observed if the motion passed, Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman
would issue a press release announcing the Council was forming a 7-member levy committee, He asked
when the Council would appoint the 7 members. Councilmember Plunkett asked how long was typically
provided for application to a committee and City Clerk Sandy Chase advised a two week period was
usually provided. Councilmember Plunkett clarified the Council was accepting applications for
appointment to the levy committee.
Councilmember Wilson suggested the qualifications Councilmember Buckshnis cited be included in the
motion. Councilmember Plunkett agreed.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the qualifications were desirable or if it was up to each
Councilmember. Councilmember Buckshnis answered it would be up to each Councilmember to make
their selection.
Mayor Haakenson clarified in two weeks after applications have been submitted, each Councilmember
will select one person.
Councilmember Wilson inquired about the implementation of the levy committee such as the frequency
of their meetings, how they would get their questions answered, how questions from the committee and
the Council would be prioritized, whether Ms. Spellman would staff the committee and forward questions
to staff, how the committee’s work would be facilitated, etc. Mayor Haakenson acknowledged confusion
with the timeline based on comments that a decision would not be made regarding a levy until the budget
was presented in October and until labor negotiations were completed which may not be until 2011. He
questioned why a levy committee would begin meeting any time soon with those restrictions. Without
knowing the structure of the committee or the frequency of their meetings, he anticipated someone would
need to take minutes of their meetings, write down the committee’s questions and refer them to staff and
staff would do their best to provide answers.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented she had obtained a number of financial reports and a great deal of
information had been provided via public records requests such as Ms. Bloom’s request regarding the
City Attorney expenses. She summarized it was simply a matter of the committee organizing itself and
establishing a framework. The sooner the committee met and the more information they disseminated to
the public, the better. She did not anticipate placing a levy on the ballot in November 2010.
MOTION CARRIED (3-2), COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON AND PETERSON VOTING NO.
8. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE
ARTS.
Council President Pro Tem Peterson explained one of the funding sources for the Edmonds Center for the
Arts’ (ECA) capital campaign were funds from Snohomish County designated for arts organizations
throughout the County and due to the economy, some of those revenues have not been realized. As a
Packet Page 252 of 304
AM-3143 11.
Update on Proposed Sign Code Amendments Regarding Wall Graphics/Murals
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Frances Chapin Time:15 Minutes
Department:Parks and Recreation Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Update on proposed sign code amendments to provide clarification of definition and criteria
for wall graphics/murals.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Set a public hearing.
Previous Council Action
March 9, 2010 City Council Community Services/Development Services Committee forwarded
the item to Planning Board for discussion and public hearing.
Narrative
The Development Services Department became aware that the section of the Sign Code Chapter
20.60 dealing with wall graphics, and therefore murals, needed clarification after a mural was
installed downtown in fall 2009. The attached draft recommends changes to clarify how murals
and artwork are handled within the Sign Code.
Staff obtained information from several cities in the region and reviewed existing code and
policies related to this issue. The proposed draft amendments were developed and refined based
on input from the Community Services Director, Planning Manager, Cultural Services Manager
and the City Attorney. The proposed draft amendments clarify the definition, outline the
application process, submittal requirements and criteria for review by staff for consideration when
issuing a permit. The item was presented for discussion at the March 9, 2010 City Council
Community Services/Development Services Committee meeting and the committee forwarded the
item to Planning Board for discussion on March 24. A public hearing was held at Planning Board
on May 12, 2010. The Planning Board recommended some minor revisions included in the
attached draft and recommended it to City Council for approval. A public hearing is scheduled for
July 6, 2010.
During the Planning Board hearing a request was made to waive permit fees for murals. In order to
expedite approval of the proposed Sign Code changes, City staff recommends discussing the issue
of permit fees with the Council Finance Committee or CSDS committee. The question of how or
whether fees can be waived for a specific type of sign is currently under review by City staff and
the attorney’s office and it will be brought forward separately in order not to delay approval of the
proposed changes in the Sign Code related to wall graphics/murals.
Packet Page 253 of 304
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Sign Code amendments
Link: 05-12-10 Planning Board Minutes
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 01:48 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Frances
Chapin
Started On: 06/10/2010 10:07
AM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 254 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 1
0006.900150
KNE/WSS
12/17/09
R:3/4/10gjz
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF
CHAPTER 20.60 RELATING TO SIGNS TO ESTABLISH
CRITERIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS FOR
WALL GRAPHIC MURALS AND ARTWORK, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds currently regulates “wall graphics,” as defined
in ECC 20.60.005 and including murals and artwork, in the sign code established in Chapter
20.60 ECC; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds desires to establish criteria designed
specifically for sign permit applications for wall graphic murals and artwork; and
WHEREAS, the planning manager or his designee will conduct design review for
sign permit applications according to the newly-established criteria; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amended.
20.60.005 Definitions.
Chapter 20.60 ECC is hereby amended as follows:
For the purposes of the enforcement of this chapter, the following
definitions shall apply:
“Attached sign” is any sign attached or affixed to a building.
Attached signs include wall signs, projecting signs, and window
signs.
Packet Page 255 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 2
“Boxed cabinet sign” is a permanent sign that is mounted on the
face of a building that is roughly rectangular in shape and provides
for internal illumination and changing the message of the sign by
replacing a single transparent or translucent material such as a
Plexiglas/lexan face. This definition is meant to distinguish
between a cabinet sign that is essentially a rectangular box and one
that follows the outlines of the letters of the sign, or an “outline
cabinet sign.”
“Building ID/historic sign” is a permanent sign that identifies or
names a building and assists in creating landmarks in the city.
Examples include dates, “1890”; names, “Beeson Building”; or
addresses.
“Campaign sign” is a temporary sign displaying a message relating
to a candidate, political party, or issue that is registered or certified
for an upcoming election.
“Commercial sign” is a sign displayed for the purpose of
identifying a commercial use, or advertising a service, product,
business or venture that is offered for trade or sale.
“Community event banner” is a noncommercial sign composed of
cloth, fabric, canvas or similarly flexible material that promotes a
temporary community event endorsed, operated or sponsored
wholly or in part by a local public entity the jurisdiction of which
includes the city of Edmonds. “Community events” are nonprofit,
governmental or charitable festivals, contests, programs, fairs,
carnivals or recreational contests conducted within the city.
“Construction sign” is a permanent or temporary sign displayed on
premises where any physical excavation, construction, demolition,
rehabilitation, structural alteration or related work is currently
occurring, pursuant to a valid building permit.
“Fixed sign” is any sign attached or affixed to the ground or any
structure in such a manner so as to provide for continuous display
for an extended or indeterminable period of time. Fixed signs
include, but are not limited to freestanding signs and wall signs.
“Freestanding sign” is any sign that is not attached or affixed to a
building. Freestanding signs can be further described as
“monument signs” or “pole signs.”
“Governmental sign” is a sign owned, operated or sponsored by a
governmental entity, and which promotes the public health, safety
Packet Page 256 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 3
or welfare. Governmental signs include, but are not limited to,
traffic signs, directional and informational signs for public
facilities, publicly sponsored warning or hazard signs, and
community event banners displayed by a governmental entity on
public property.
“Group sign” is a sign or signs on one sign structure serving two or
more businesses sharing a parking facility.
“Identification structure” is a structure intended to attract the
attention of the public to a site, without the use of words or
symbols identifying the businesses. Examples include fountains,
sculptures, awnings, and totem poles.
“Internally illuminated signs” include any sign where light shines
through a transparent or semi-transparent sign face to illuminate
the sign's message. Exposed neon is considered to be a form of
internal illumination.
“Marquee sign” is any sign attached or made part of a building
marquee. A marquee sign is a form of projecting sign.
“Monument signs” are freestanding signs that have integrated the
structural component of the sign into the design of the sign and
sign base.
“Noncommercial sign” is a sign that is intended to display a
religious, charitable, cultural, governmental, informational,
political, educational, or artistic message, that is not primarily
associated with a good, product, or service offered for sale or trade.
Noncommercial signs include signs advertising incidental and
temporary commercial activities conducted by churches and
nonprofit businesses, clubs, groups, associations or organizations.
“Off-premises sign” is any sign that advertises or relates to a good,
product, service, event, or meeting, that is offered, sold, traded,
provided, or conducted at some location or premises other than that
upon which the sign is posted or displayed. Off-premises signs
include all signs posted or displayed in the public right-of-way.
“On-premises sign” is any sign that advertises or relates to a good,
product, service, event, or meeting that is lawfully permitted to be
offered, sold, traded, provided, or conducted at the location or
premises upon which the sign is posted or displayed. On-premises
signs also include signs not related to any particular location or
premises, such as signs displaying religious, charitable, cultural,
Packet Page 257 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 4
governmental, informational, political, educational, or artistic
messages that are intentionally displayed by the owner of the
property or premises upon which the sign is displayed.
“Outline cabinet sign” is a permanent sign that is mounted on the
face of a building that roughly follows the shape of the text of the
sign and provides for internal illumination. This definition is meant
to distinguish between a cabinet sign that follows the outlines of
the letters of the sign and one that is essentially a rectangular box
or a “boxed cabinet sign.” An “outlined cabinet sign” will be
treated more like an “individual letter sign” where the area of the
sign is calculated based on the actual outlined shape of the sign.
“Permanent sign” is a fixed or portable sign intended for
continuous or intermittent display for periods exceeding 60 days in
any calendar year.
“Pole signs” are freestanding signs where the structural support for
the sign is a pole(s). Pole signs may include community event
banners where the banner is supported by at least two poles that are
permanently attached to the ground (“pole-mounted community
event banners”).
“Portable sign” is any sign that is readily capable of being moved
or removed, whether attached or affixed to the ground or any
structure that is typically intended for temporary display. Portable
signs include, but are not limited to:
1. Signs designed and constructed with a chassis or support
with or without wheels;
2. Menu and “sandwich” board signs;
3. “A” and “T” frame signs;
4. Wooden, metal, or plastic “stake” or “yard” signs;
5. Posters or banners affixed to windows, railings, overhangs,
trees, hedges, or other structures or vegetation, except for pole-
mounted community event banners;
6. Signs mounted upon vehicles parked and visible from the
public right-of-way, except signs identifying the related business
when the vehicle is being used in the normal day-to-day operation
of the business, and except for signs advertising for sale the vehicle
upon which the sign is mounted;
Packet Page 258 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 5
7. Searchlights;
8. Inflatables.
“Premises” is the actual physical area of the lot upon which a sign
is posted or displayed, except within the boundaries of the BC or
BD zone in the downtown activity center as defined in the
comprehensive plan, where “premises” shall include any portion of
the public sidewalk which fronts upon the lot.
“Projecting sign” is any sign attached or affixed to a building or
wall in such a manner that its leading edge extends more than 12
inches beyond the surface of such building or wall.
“Reader board sign” is a sign that is designed to allow for a change
in the message, either by adding or removing plastic letters, or by
means of electronics and lights.
“Real estate sign” is a sign displaying a message relating to the
sale or rent of real property.
“Sign” is any structure, device or fixture that is visible from a
public place, that incorporates graphics, symbols, or written copy
for the purposes of conveying a particular message to public
observers, including wall graphics or identification structures.
“Sign area” is the maximum actual area of a sign that is visible
from any single point of observation from any public vantage
point. Supporting structures which are part of a sign display shall
be included in the calculation of the sign area.
“Temporary sign” is an allowed portable sign intended for short-
term display, not to exceed 60 calendar days in any calendar year.
“Wall graphic” is a wall sign, including murals, in which color and
form, and primarily without the use of words, is a part of the
overall design on the building(s) where the wall graphic is
proposed in which the business is located. A wall graphic may be
painted or applied (not to exceed one-half inch in thickness) to a
building as a part of its overall color and design, but may not be
internally lighted. Internally lighted assemblies, including those
which project from the wall of the structure, or which are located
on any accessory structure on the site, shall be considered wall
signs and comply with the requirements of this chapter.
Packet Page 259 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 6
“Wall sign” is a sign that is attached or affixed to a wall and that is
parallel to and not projecting more than 12 inches at any angle
from such wall. Wall signs include signs that are painted directly
upon a wall.
“Window sign” is a sign that is attached or affixed to a window, or
a sign displayed within 24 inches of the inside of a window in such
a manner as to be visible from any public place.
20.60.015 Design review procedures.
A. Staff Approval. Except as referred to the architectural
design board pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, and
except as provided in subsection B of this section, the planning
manager, or designee, shall review all applications for design
review under this chapter, and shall approve, conditionally approve
or deny the application in accordance with the policies of ECDC
20.10.000, the criteria set forth in ECDC 20.10.070, and the
standards and requirements of this chapter, provided, that for
murals and artwork the planning manager or designee shall review
the application in accordance with the criteria set forth in
subsection C of this section.
1. The planning manager or designee may refer design review
applications to the architectural design board for the types of signs
listed below, where the planning manager determines that the
proposed sign has the potential for significant adverse impacts on
community aesthetics or traffic safety:
The decision of the planning manager
on any sign permit application shall be final except that signs
reviewed by the Architectural Design Board are renewable may be
appealed to the hearing examiner pursuant to the procedure as a
Type II appeal (See ECDC 20.001.005) established in Chapter
20.105 ECDC for appeal of staff decisions and signs reviewed
under subsection (A)(1) are appealable as provided therein. (No
longer current)
a. Any sign application for an identification structure as
defined by this chapter;
b. Any sign application for a wall graphic as defined by this
chapter;
c. Any proposed sign that the planning manager determines to
be obtrusive, garish or otherwise not consistent with the
architectural features of the surrounding neighborhood.
Packet Page 260 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 7
B. Review by Architectural Design Board. The architectural
design board shall review those signs listed below and any sign
permit referred by the planning manager pursuant to subsection
(A)(1) of this section. The architectural design board shall approve,
conditionally approve or deny such sign permit applications in
accordance with the policies of ECDC 20.10.000, the criteria set
forth in ECDC 20.10.070, and the standards and requirements of
this chapter. The decision of the architectural design board on any
sign permit application may be appealed to the city council
pursuant to the procedure established in ECDC 20.10.080 for
appeal of architectural design board decisions.
1. Any sign permit application that requests a modification to
any of the standards prescribed by this chapter. The ADB shall
only approve modification requests that meet all of the following
criteria:
a. The request is for signage on a site that has a unique
configuration, such as frontage on more than two streets or has an
unusual geometric shape;
b. The subject property, building, or business has site
conditions that do not afford it the opportunity to provide signage
consistent with or similar to other properties in the vicinity;
c. The design of the proposed signage must be compatible in
its use of materials, colors, design and proportions with
development throughout the site;
d. In no event shall the modification result in signage which
exceeds the maximum normally allowed by more than 50 percent.
C. Staff Review of Murals and Artwork. When the proposed
wall sign is art, the planning manager or designee shall review and
approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application in
accordance with the following criteria. While a separate sign
permit is required for each wall graphic, the staff may make a
single design review decision on related wall graphics. Related
wall graphics include graphics for sites within reasonable
proximity to each other that are related by theme, style, and
context. When a proposed wall graphic is proposed as a mural or
artwork, the planning manager or designee shall review and
approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application in
accordance with the following criteria. While a separate sign
permit is required for each wall graphic, the staff may make a
single design review decision on wall graphics that consist of
Packet Page 261 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 8
related murals or artwork. Related murals or artwork may include
multiple proposals for sites within reasonable proximity to each
other that are related by theme, style, materials used, and/or
context. The decision of the staff on any design review application
containing a mural or art as a wall graphic may be appealed to the
city council pursuant to the procedure established in ECDC
20.06.105.030 for staff decisions. (No longer current)
1. Art, like other exercises of First Amendment rights, may be
limited by reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. In this
case, these criteria will be utilized to enhance the aesthetics of the
City and to ensure quality and maintenance standards are observed.
No recommendation shall be based upon the content or message
expressed by an artist or in a work of art. Applicants are
encouraged to coordinate their artwork with the design or
architectural elements of the building and the historic and
pedestrian-oriented character of the downtown area.
2. Specific submission requirements for design review
include, but are not limited to:
a. Site sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum 1/4 inch scale color drawings of the art concept
or art component;
c. Material/color samples;
d. Written proposal: a written proposal in 8 1/2 x 11 inch
format to include a description and summary of a final design
proposal for the artwork; detailed maintenance requirements; a
schedule for development, fabrication, and completion; artists’
resume; and evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or
designee; and
e. When required pursuant to ECDC 20.45.050, a cCertificate
(?) of appropriateness shall be obtained from the Historic
Preservation Commission must be obtained for murals on or
adjacent to designated historic structures or on walls facing historic
properties within a designated historic district.
3. Review Criteria. Review criteria for the design review
include:
a. Quality of the materials used to create the artwork.
Materials should be resistant to fading; no florescent paints;
Packet Page 262 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 9
b. Durability and permanence, including ability to withstand
age, vandalism, and weathering. Consideration should be given to
anti-graffiti coating; and
D. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections A, B, and
c. Compatibility of the artwork with architectural elements,
other elements of the street, and adjacent structures. Compatibility
shall be determined by relationships of the elements of form,
proportion, scale, color, materials, surface treatment, and size and
style of lettering. Lettering shall be minimized, but may be
considered for inclusion when necessary to the artistic content.
C
of this section, sign permit applications shall not be referred to or
reviewed by the architectural design board if the proposed sign
constitutes a modification to an existing sign and involves no
significant alteration or modification to the size, height, design,
lighting or color of the existing sign. Sign permit applications for
such sign modifications shall be processed and subject to review in
the same manner as provided in for staff review in subsection A of
this section.
Section 2. Severability.
If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date.
APPROVED:
This ordinance, being an exercise of a power
specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take
effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of
the title.
MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 263 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 10
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
W. SCOTT SNYDER
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Page 264 of 304
{WSS769524.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } 11
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 20.60 RELATING TO SIGNS TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR
THE ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS FOR WALL GRAPHIC MURALS AND ARTWORK,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010.
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
Packet Page 265 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 3
process, which is essential to its success. He said that people in single-family residential neighborhoods often see a PRD
proposal as something radically different, so it is important to allow them an opportunity to voice their concerns.
Mr. Hertrich expressed his belief that “sustainability” is a term that can have a different meaning every time it is used. He
suggested that each time the word is used in code language, an explanation should be provided regarding its meaning. He
further suggested the City establish criteria for determining sustainability.
Mr. Hertrich said he has heard some very negative comments from citizens in the community about cottage housing, and they
do not want it in single-family zones. He questioned what would be gained by going from a single building with setbacks,
open space, green areas and trees to a bunch of small buildings with the same density and the only actual open space is the
sidewalks between the buildings. He suggested this would be a radical look for the community. He recalled previous
Planning Board discussions about what can happen when houses are constructed very close together and there is not room
for traffic movement, emergency access, pedestrian access, and parking. He cautioned the Board to avoid the “Snohomish
County problem” where they allowed some extremely tight development and have now changed their minds. He suggested
that this concept results in neighborhoods that quickly deteriorate because there is no space for people to live. He
summarized that sustainability has much to do with the design of a structure, light and open space. Again, he asked the
Board to take PRD’s off the list for potential change. The ordinance works well in its present form.
Board Member Reed advised that he received an email from Finis Tupper, asking him to read the following into the record:
“The purpose of a Comprehensive Plan is to establish a long-range plan, looking into the future, addressing the needs and
vision relating to land use, transportation, parks and open space, community facilities and economic development. The
Edmonds Comprehensive Plan sets a foundation for decision-making from a broad and far-reaching policy standpoint for all
governmental action even though the plan itself is not regulatory. The most important power and duty granted to the City of
Edmonds is the authority and responsibility to regulate land-use for the sole purpose of protecting and promoting public
health, safety and general welfare of current and future citizens.
All private projects requiring City review and approval should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. All public
projects should have Hearing Examiner review and advisory opinion. All public projects and street vacations must be
consistent with and satisfy the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Having this requirement of a Hearing Examiner advisory
opinion for all public projects, capital facilities projects and street vacations provides additional public participation and
ensures the City Council has another legal opinion ensuring consistency. Planning staff’s recommendation to the Planning
Board to make changes to the Effect of Plan is inconsistent and contrary to the Edmonds Municipal Code (EMC) and
Hearing Examiner duties. Specifically, EMC 10.35(F) requires Hearing Examiner review. (Vacations and Dedications, The
hearing examiner will review the comprehensive plan and report on the same prior to any street vacation of dedication as
provided in ECDC 15.05.02).
ECDC 15.05.020 was the Comprehensive Plan prior to the 1997 adoption of the Comprehensive Plan as a separate stand-
alone document. The Mayor and City staff admitted their failure to not act according to the mandatory requirement of a
Hearing Examiner advisory opinion prior to Council decision-making in the adoption of the street vacations, capital
facilities and property purchases. This failure is not a good enough reason to make changes to the current Comprehensive
Plan. Saying long ago adopted procedure is forgotten and does not apply does not make it ripe for wholesale edit and
elimination. The Planning Board should not accept any change to the current Edmonds Comprehensive Plan that is
inconsistent with the Edmonds Municipal Code. Actions like this just make the process less certain and contentious for those
who know the code and understand the meaning of the words.”
PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION OF
DEFINITION AND CRITERIA FOR WALL GRAPHIC MURALS OR ARTWORK
Vice Chair Lovell referred the audience to the rules and procedures for the public hearing, which are found on the back of
the Board’s agenda. He advised that the public hearing is related to draft sign code amendments to provide clarification of
definition and criteria for wall graphic murals or artwork.
Packet Page 266 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 4
Ms. Chapin recalled that the Development Services Department became aware that the section of the code dealing with wall
graphics and therefore murals (Section 20.60) needed clarification after a mural was installed downtown in the fall of 2009.
Since that time, she has worked with the Development Services Director, Planning Manager and City Attorney to develop
the proposed amendments. She emphasized that the proposed changes are intended to address wall graphics that are applied
to walls on private property and would not be applicable to public art and/or public property. Ms. Chapin advised that staff
met with the City Council’s Community/Development Services Committee, and they forwarded the item to the Planning
Board for discussion March 24th. She explained that staff obtained information from several cities in the region and
reviewed the existing code and policies related to the issue. They learned that jurisdictions handle murals in a number of
different ways such as:
Establish a theme and require that all murals must conform to the theme.
Set up a City-run mural program to regulate murals, which would necessitate staff time and dollars.
Address murals and artwork as a type of sign for which a permit and a fee is required as part of the basic sign code.
Ms. Chapin advised that, at this time, Edmonds regulates murals and wall graphics via their sign code. However, she
cautioned that murals and wall graphics cannot be reviewed based on aesthetics alone unless the community has an
established theme. Wall graphics are different than public art for which the City has a selection process that does look at
aesthetic elements. She summarized that the goal of the proposed amendments is to clarify the definition, outline the
application process, identify the submittal requirements and provide criteria for staff to consider when reviewing
applications. She reviewed each of the proposed changes as follows:
Section 20.60.005 – Definitions. The definition for “wall graphic” was changed to include the word murals. In
addition, the word “primarily” was inserted before “without the use of words,” to allow flexibility for wall graphics to
include at least some words. However, inserting the word “primarily” ensures that the artwork would not be simply a
written piece.
Section 20.60.015.A – Design Review Procedures. The language in this section was changed to make it clear that wall
graphic applications would be reviewed by the Planning Manager, or designee. Language was also provided to clarify
that the applications would be reviewed in accordance with the criteria set forth in Subsection C of the section.
Section 20.60.015.C – Staff Review of Murals and Artwork. This is a new section that describes the review process.
The intent is to streamline the application process, and one way to do that is to allow applicants to have a single design
review for multiple wall graphic proposals that are all related. However, she emphasized that the proposed language
would still require a separate sign permit for each wall graphic.
Section 20.60.015.C.1. This section was added to make it clear that art, like other exercises of First Amendment rights,
may be limited to reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. The criteria provided in the code would be used to
ensure quality and maintenance standards are observed. She explained that no proposal could be denied based on its
content or message, but applicants would be strongly encouraged to coordinate the artwork with the design of the
building and the historic and pedestrian-oriented character of the downtown.
Section 20.60.015.C.2. Specific Submission Requirements. This section was added to identify the items an applicant
must provide as part of a proposal. The requirements include a site sketch showing location of the artwork, minimum ¼-
inch scale drawings of the art concept or art component and material/color samples. A written proposal would also be
required to include a description and summary of the final design proposal, detailed maintenance requirements, a
schedule for development, an artist’s resume, and evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or designee. In
addition, a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission would be required for murals on
designated historic structures or within a designated historic district.
Section 20.60.015.C.3 – Review Criteria. This section was added to identify review criteria for design review. It
addresses the quality of materials used to create the artwork and requires that the materials be resistant to fading. No
florescent paint would be allowed. It also addresses the issue of durability and permanence, including the ability to
withstand age, vandalism and weathering. It recommends consideration be given to anti-graffiti coating. In addition,
Packet Page 267 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 5
the artwork would be reviewed for compatibility with architectural elements, other elements of the street and adjacent
structures.
Board Member Cloutier referred to the proposed definition for “wall graphic” and questioned the purpose of limiting the art
to a thickness of ½ inch. He asked if there is a process for allowing exceptions to this requirement. Mr. Chave answered that
if the code states that a wall graphic cannot be more than ½ inch thick, then that is the standard the City would enforce. Ms.
Chapin pointed out that this limitation is part of the existing code. Mr. Chave said the only procedure for obtaining a greater
thickness would be a variance, which would require Architectural Design Board (ADB) review. In the case of a variance,
the applicant would be required to explain the specific circumstances that warrant a variance. Ms. Chapin said that if a wall
graphic is allowed a greater thickness, there could be issues with public safety because the tiles would weigh more.
However, she acknowledged that she does not have any scientific data to support the limitation.
Ms. Chapin explained there has been some confusion about publicly-funded artwork on public property as opposed to what
they are talking about in the sign code, which is a private entity putting artwork on a private building. Board Member Reed
asked what controls the art that is placed on public property. Ms. Chapin answered that the Art Commission has a detailed
process for selecting public art, which includes a public process that is juried. The jury consists of representatives from the
City Council, the Art Commission, and the public. Prior to final approval by the City Council, a public hearing is held. In
addition, public meetings are held throughout the process so people are made aware of what is being proposed. Board
Member Reed said he has heard suggestions that a mural should be placed on the south side of the Senior Center Building.
Ms. Chapin said the Senior Center Building is fairly high on the Art Commission’s priority list for using public art to
enhance the area.
Manya Schilperoort, Edmonds, thanked the City staff for taking great care to put together a proposal to change the sign
ordinance. She said it will be helpful to have the requirements listed out in a clear and concise way. She said she serves on
the Board of the Edmonds Mural Society and has reviewed the proposed amendments. She offered the following
observations and recommendations:
Section 16.60.005 – Definitions. She suggested that in the definition of “wall graphic” the words “in which the
business is located” should be changed to “where the wall graphic is proposed.” She explained that the artwork would
not necessarily relate to the business that is located inside the building.
Section 16.60.015.A – Staff Approval. She asked for clarification about who the designee would be.
Section 16.60.015.C – Staff Review of Murals and Artwork. She suggested the second to the last sentence be
changed to read, “Related murals or artwork may include multiple proposals for sites within reasonable proximity to
each other that are related by theme, style, materials used, and/or context.”
Section 16.60.015.C.1 – She suggested that the words “design of the building” be changed to “design or architectural
elements of the building.” She shared an example of a door that is blocked in and suggested that perhaps artwork could
be constructed to take advantage of this element.
There was some confusion as to whether Ms. Schilperoort was referencing the staff’s proposed language, or the language
submitted just prior to the meeting by Clayton Moss. Ms. Schilperoort said she supports the staff’s proposed language, with
the changes she noted.
Ms. Schilperoort said the goal of the Edmonds Mural Society is to provide attractive murals throughout the downtown that
attract tourist to Edmonds. She asked that the Planning Board forward a recommendation to the City Council to waive all
fees associated with a mural application. She explained that, at this point in time, the Edmonds Mural Society uses donations
from the citizens of Edmonds to pay for the murals, and the effort is citizen driven. She advised that some communities have
been able to attract large numbers of visitors to see their mural displays, and this has improved the economic health of their
downtown areas. She specifically noted that people come from all over the world to Toppenish, Washington, to see their
murals. She said it would be wonderful if the City of Edmonds could see their way to requiring either a very small fee or no
fee for a sign permit to install a mural.
Packet Page 268 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 6
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said he has dealt with the sign code at various times because he was concerned about things
getting out of hand. He said that sometimes good thing turns bad if there are too many in an area. He said he has recently
been introduced to the need for signs for private businesses, but he questioned where the City should draw the line. He said
the City used to go on the idea that it is the business that draws the people and not the sign, but anyone who has a small
business knows that signs draw people that pass by. He said he has visited areas where large murals have been on display,
but he has never visited a town where there are murals on every building along a street. He questioned if the program would
reach the point where the murals detract from the buildings, themselves. If the City were to allow a quantity of murals,
decisions need to be made about height limits, etc. He noted that, as currently proposed, wall graphics would have no height
limit. As a member of the Senior Center Board, he said he has also proposed that something be done to decorate the southern
wall. He said he shares the enthusiasm of others who want murals on buildings throughout the downtown.
Mr. Hertrich referred to Section 20.60.015.C.3.c, which states that the artwork must be compatible with architectural
elements, other elements of the street, and adjacent structures. It further states that compatibility would be determined by
relationship of the elements of the form, proportion, scale, etc. He questioned if there is a true definition for what this
section means. He noted that compatibility can mean different things, depending on the person. This language would be
open to interpretation by the applicant, the Planning Manager, and perhaps even the ADB. Who will make the final decision
about which opinion would be considered right? He agreed it is appropriate to have some elements of control in the
definition, but he questioned how the rules would be set up. For example, would the City limit the murals to every other
building, or would every building be allowed to have a mural? Should murals be allowed on second story walls, or should
they be restricted to the ground floor, only? He said it will be a tough job for City staff to come up with answers.
Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, announced that he has submitted a letter to the City from a group that is working to provide a
new sign at the Edmonds Museum. He said there are currently two signs on the property, and they are requesting an
additional sign. He referred to the City’s current definition for a freestanding sign, which is any sign that is not attached or
affixed to a building. He said the new sign would not be attached to the building, so they would be asking for an exemption
to the sign code.
Pat Brier, Edmonds, said she was the culprit behind the first mural that was installed in the downtown, and she knew she
would have to break ground. She worked closely with the building owner and the neighborhood to identify a theme, a
design, etc. The Edmonds Mural Society makes sure that any artist who wants to participate in the mural program follows
this same careful approach. Each artist must sign off that there will be nothing outlandish or out of line or that others might
construe as obscene. They are careful to make sure they work with the architectural idiosyncrasies and historic elements of
the buildings. Their goal is it to create an outdoor fine art gallery.
THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
In answer to Ms. Schilperoort’s question, Mr. Chave explained that the Planning Manager’s designee would be the staff
person who is assigned to work on an individual mural project. He noted this is standard language used throughout the code.
He also referred to Ms. Schilperoort’s recommendation to change the wording in Section 20.60.015.C by adding the words
“materials used” to the second to the last sentence. He said staff would support this change, if it is the desire of the Board.
Mr. Chave referred to the changes recommended by Clayton Moss and noted that most are intended to provide more detail
rather than change the intent of the proposed language. For example, requiring a certificate of insurance (Section
20.60.015.C.2.c) would go above and beyond what staff believes is necessary. Therefore, staff would not support the
change. In addition, his proposed amendments to Section 20.60.016.C.2.a and C.2.b would add more specific requirements
for the application submittal. He explained that Mr. Moss is very capable of providing these additional materials, but
someone else might not be. He urged the Board to consider submission requirements that are the minimum necessary rather
than imposing requirements that go beyond what someone could easily provide. However, he agreed it would be appropriate
to change Section 20.60.015.C.2.b to insert the word “color” between “scale” and “drawings.”
Board Member Guenther observed that the information identified by Mr. Moss would be good to include as part of the
application. However, unless the code specifies that certain colors be used, the information would not be necessary in order
Packet Page 269 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 7
to approve a proposal. Requiring the information would mean extra work for staff when it is not needed. He said he does
not see the advantage of adding more specific submission requirements than what has been identified in the staff’s
recommended language.
Ms. Chapin referred to the language Mr. Moss recommended for Section 20.60.016.C.3.a. She noted that staff’s proposed
language for this section would already require a review of the quality of materials used to create the artwork. It would also
require that materials be resistant to fading and that no fluorescent paint be used. However, she agreed that the language
could also prohibit lead-based paint and other materials proven to be harmful to humans or the environment. The section
could also prohibit reflective paint and materials, which could be problematic for traffic. Board Member Cloutier pointed
out that lead-based paints are already prohibited by other sections of the code. He further noted that all paint is harmful if
ingested.
Mr. Chave suggested that the language Mr. Moss proposed for Sections 20.60.015.C.2.a and C.2.b could be included as
suggestions of what an applicant might want to include in the submission materials. However, they should not be
requirements. He reminded the Board that it would be difficult for some applicants to provide this level of specificity. Ms.
Chapin agreed. Ms. Chapin suggested that perhaps the information submitted by Mr. Moss could be summarized in a
handout as things an applicant might want to consider. Ms. Schilperoort pointed out that the Edmonds Mural Society already
includes this information on their website. Board Member Cloutier agreed that while they are important suggestions, they
should not be included in the code. The remainder of the Board concurred.
Ms. Chapin referred to Ms. Schilperoort’s recommendation that the last sentence in Section 20.60.015.C.1 be changed by
replacing “design of the building” with “design or architectural element of the building.” She reviewed that applicants are
encouraged to coordinate their artwork with the design of the building, so she would support the proposed change.
Ms. Chapin also referred to Ms. Schilperoort’s recommendation that the third sentence in Section 20.60.015.C be changed by
adding “materials used and/or” after “style.” Board Member Cloutier cautioned against placing too many requirements on an
applicant that wants to submit a package of mural applications for design review. In his view, they should encourage this
approach rather than requiring staff to review each submittal separately. Ms. Chapin cautioned that the language must be
clear to require that the proposals be related in one of the ways identified. Otherwise, staff could end up with a package of
unrelated murals.
Vice Chair Lovell referred to the first sentence of the proposed definition for “wall graphic” and suggested the words “on the
building” be changed to “of the building.” After further discussion, the Board decided not to make this change. However,
they indicated support for Ms. Schilperoort’s recommendation that the words “in which the business is located” should be
replaced with “where the wall graphic is proposed.”
Vice Chair Lovell requested clarification of Section 20.60.015.C.1. Mr. Chave explained that this section should be read in
relation to the sentences that follow, which explain that the City cannot regulate the content of artwork.
Vice Chair Lovell said he believes murals will be a great addition to the community and will help promote tourism.
However, he referred to an article in the May 12th edition of THE SEATTLE TIMES,which describes a situation where
someone tagged a mural with graffiti. He expressed concern that the more murals are highlighted in Edmonds, the more
opportunity there will be for taggers to damage them. Ms. Chapin reminded the Board that the proposed language
recommends that consideration be given to using anti-graffiti coating, but there are also materials that can be cleaned. There
has been a lot of documentation published regarding this issue, and the City wants artists to be cognizant of the concern.
There are many places where murals are not tagged and certain materials can be used to help resolve the issue.
Vice Chair Lovell pointed out that art is “in the eye of the person who is looking at it.” He noted that, at least once a week,
he hears a story about someone in the country wanting to make a statement by putting up art that is offensive or sends a
message that is not at all appropriate. He said he understands that the Edmonds Mural Society has guidelines in place to
prevent this type of artwork. Mr. Chave agreed that the Edmonds Mural Society has strict guidelines, but the Board should
keep in mind that the proposed language would be applicable to all mural applications, even those that are not associated
with the Edmonds Mural Society.
Packet Page 270 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 8
Ms. Schilperoort said the Edmonds Mural Society has tried hard to avoid these situations by providing a number of checks
and balances. Their mission is to celebrate the beauty, history and people of Edmonds. Every mural will in some way
celebrate these three aspects of the community. They raise funding from private citizens to pay for the murals. If the citizens
do not like what they put up, the funding will disappear. They work with landowners to apply the murals to their walls, and
they must approve all murals that are placed through their organization. Ms. Chapin agreed the Edmonds Mural Society has
done a good job of addressing these concerns. However, she once again reminded the Board that the sign code would be
applicable for every private property owner, and that is why staff proposed language to encourage compatibility of the
artwork with the nature of the buildings, the space and the community.
Mr. Chave recalled that when the Board discussed the proposed amendments in March, staff suggested the City has a choice
for how they regulate murals and other wall graphics. They can do so via the sign code, which leaves it open to all private
properties; or they can establish a City-run mural program, which is entirely different.
Board Member Reed suggested that perhaps the language could be changed to involve the Edmonds Mural Society in staff’s
review of wall graphic applications. Mr. Chave said this approach would not be allowed. If the Board decides that the
applications should be reviewed administratively, no outside party can be brought in to help make the decisions. Again, he
said the other option is to establish a City-run mural program, at which point the Art Commission would be responsible for
reviewing applications and making the final decision. Staff would not be part of the review.
Board Member Reed suggested the Board consider eliminating wall graphics from the sign code. He noted that while a wall
graphic is considered art, it could have some message related to the business. Ms. Chapin pointed out that if it does, it would
be considered a sign and not artwork. Mr. Chave explained that if wall graphics are regulated via the sign code, staff would
not be deciding whether to approve an application or not based on content. The staff’s review would be based on size,
location, durability, etc. and not what the sign actually looks like. If the Board wants the City to have the ability to regulate
the content of a wall graphic, they would have to establish a separate mural program, which would be a much more elaborate
and lengthy process.
Board Member Cloutier said the issue is a matter of property rights and trusting private property owners to do the right thing.
They must have confidence that building owners will not do anything that would be counterproductive to their goal of
drawing people to their businesses. He reminded the Board that there are no regulations in place to limit what a single-
family residential property owner places on his/her home. The proposed amendments are applicable only to commercial
properties.
Board Member Johnson suggested that the phrase “not to exceed one-half inch in thickness” be deleted from the definition
for “wall graphic.” She said she would like the City to encourage murals made of clay or ceramics. She said she
understands that the amendments are being brought forward because of the efforts of the Edmonds Mural Society, but they
need to look at the issue from a citywide perspective. She noted there is beautiful artwork in adjacent communities that is
carved in relief style. For example, a relief carved clay mural has been incorporated into the brick of a building in the City of
Lynnwood, and a bank on Highway 99 in the City of Shoreline has used this same approach. She said she would like to
encourage this type of mural in Edmonds, as well. Ms. Chapin explained the two pieces referenced by Board Member
Johnson are actually integral parts of the buildings and not murals that were applied after the building was constructed. She
noted that this type of art would not be prohibited by the proposed language. She recommended the Board maintain the one-
half inch requirement, which would allow for tile murals. Larger sculptural pieces could be sent to the ADB for review of a
variance. She noted there could be structural issues related to public safety if materials are greater than one-half inch thick.
Board Member Johnson observed that, in many cases, the tile itself is less than one-half inch, but when it is mounted to the
building, it can protrude beyond one-half inch. Board Member Guenther said this all depends on the type of tile that is used.
He pointed out that murals with relief are actually considered masonry carvings from bricks. When bricks are applied to the
side of a building, it goes beyond something that is adhered to the side. Rather than a thickness of one-half inch, it would be
more like three or four inches. This would be considered a structural element and not a wall graphic.
Packet Page 271 of 304
APPROVED
Planning Board Minutes
May 12, 2010 Page 9
Board Member Johnson said she would still like to encourage ceramic, glass and mosaic murals. She said she works in this
medium and feels it is very difficult to stay within a one-half inch thickness. Board Member Guenther again said that
artwork that is greater than one-half inch thick would be considered a sculptural element rather than a mural. Board Member
Johnson said that if they are only talking about paint and its application, then the one-half inch limitation makes sense. But if
they require a variance process before the ADB to do anything with a greater thickness, the process would be more
cumbersome. Again, she said she would like to encourage these other types of mediums. Board Member Guenther clarified
that the proposed amendments are intended to apply to wall graphics and murals. While he understands Board Member
Johnson’s point, it would require the Board to expand beyond the scope of what the proposed language is intended to
address.
BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF
APPROVAL OT THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE DRAFT SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS WITH THE
FOLLOWING CHANGES:
SECTION 20.60.005. CHANGE THE FIRST SENTENCE OF THE DEFINITION FOR “WALL GRAPHIC”
TO READ, “WALL GRAPHIC IS A WALL SIGN, INCLUDING MURALS, IN WHICH COLOR AND FORM,
AND PRIMARILY WITHOUT THE USE OF WORDS, IS PART OF THE OVERALL DESIGN OF THE
BUILDING WHERE THE WALL GRAPHIC IS PROPOSED.”
SECTION 20.60.015.C. CHANGE THE THIRD SENTENCE TO READ, “RELATED MURALS OR
ARTWORK MAY INCLUDE MULTIPLE PROPOSALS FOR SITES WITHIN REASONABLE PROXIMITY
TO EACH OTHER THAT ARE RELATED BY THEME, STYLE, MATERIALS USED, AND/OR CONTEXT.”
SECTION 20.60.015.C.1. CHANGE THE LAST SENTENCE TO READ, “APPLICANTS ARE
ENCOURAGED TO COORDINATE THEIR ARTWORK WITH THE DESIGN OR ARCHITECTURAL
ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING AND THE HISTORIC AND PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED CHARACTER OF
THE DOWNTOWN AREA.”
SECTION 20.60.015.C.2.b. CHANGE TO READ, “MINIMUM 1/4-INCH SCALE COLOR DRAWINGS OF
THE ART CONCEPT OR ART COMPONENT.”
BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER MOVED THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER
MAKING THE APPROPRIATE CHANGES TO THE FEE SCHEDULE TO ENABLE THE CITY TO WAIVE
THE FEES FOR BOTH THE BUILDING PERMIT AND THE DESIGN REVIEW RELATED TO MURALS.
BOARD MEMBER GUENTHER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The Board took a break from 8:40 P.M. to 8:48 P.M.
DISCUSSION ON UPDATE TO THE CITY’S SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AS PART OF THE CODE
REWRITE PROJECT
Mr. Clugston reviewed that the Subdivision Regulations have been discussed for the past 18 months in one form or another,
starting with a narrow analysis of how the City’s townhouse subdivision policy could be more effectively codified and
implemented. The focus later extended to how Planned Residential Developments (PRD’s) are regulated, and then to how
low-impact development and sustainability could be incorporated into the City’s subdivision processes. He advised that staff
anticipates the following outcomes from the comprehensive rewrite of the Subdivision Regulations:
Innovate by including additional flexibility to foster low-impact development, distributed energy generation, and tree
retention while increasing affordable housing options.
Balance predictability and flexibility in a subdivision regulation that includes formal and short plats, as well as PRD type
and townhouse design standards for lot creation whether in single or multi-family zones.
Streamline the regulation to make it easier to use and administer.
Packet Page 272 of 304
AM-3134 12.
Council-Manager Form of Government
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Submitted For:Councilman Michael Plunkett Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Council Type:Action
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Council-Manager form of government.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
No action taken.
Recommendation: Place on first available agenda for public comment and potential action to
place on November ballot.
Narrative
Born out of the turn-of-the-century reform movement, the council-manager system of local
government started in Staunton, Virginia in 1908. Since its establishment, the council-manager
form has become the most popular form of government in the United States. For more than 85
years, council-manager governments have responded to the changing needs of citizens and their
communities. Currently, 3,625 cities operate under this form. They vary greatly in size and
characteristics, including independent cities, center cities, suburbs, and counties. More than 75.5
million people are within this form of government. Out of 199 cities with greater than 100,000
citizens, 112 use this form of government. Some examples are Phoenix, San Diego, Dallas,
Cincinnati, San Antonio, Kansas City, Missouri, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Edmonds will still have a mayor who would be elected by the council from among the council
members. The mayor would continue to preside at council meetings, serve as a spokesperson for
the community, facilitate communication and understanding between elected and appointed
officials, assist the council in setting goals, advocate policy and serve as a promoter and defender
of the community. However, the day-to-day running of the City of Edmonds would be
administered by a professional manager. There would be a transition.
The manager is hired to serve the council and the community and to bring to local government the
benefits of training and experience in administering local government projects and programs on
behalf of the governing body. The manager prepares a budget for the council’s consideration;
recruits, hires, and supervises the staff; serves as the council chief adviser; and carries out the
Packet Page 273 of 304
council’s policies. Council members and citizens count on the manager to provide complete and
objective information, pros and cons of alternatives, and long-term consequences. Most of the
business of a city is just that, business. Whether it is keeping traffic signals operating, police cars
maintained, employees productive or just paying the bills on time. It is the nuts and bolts of city
operation that is done with a neutral city manager professional.
Council members are elected to be leaders to focus on policy issues that are responsive to citizens’
needs and wishes. This leaves a city manager, appointed by council, free to carry out and manage
policy. The council focuses on the community’s goals, major projects, and such long-term
considerations as community public safety, land use, capital improvement plans, financing, and
strategic planning.
There is a professionally established code of ethics for city managers. The Code specifies 12
ethical principles of personal and professional conduct, including dedication to the cause of good
government. In 1914, a group of appointed managers formed a professional association,
eventually known as the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), to share
their expertise and experiences in local government management. Since that time, ICMA has been
the professional organization for appointed chief management executives in local government.
The purposes of ICMA are to enhance the quality of local government through professional
management and to support and assist professional local government administrators
internationally. To that end, the Association provides technical assistance and publications to
better assure that we have the best administrator to run our city. Who do you really think is going
to be more accountable to you and to your neighbor? ICMA members believe in the effectiveness
of representative democracy and the value of government services provided equitably to citizens
within a community. ICMA members also are committed to standards of honesty and integrity
more vigorous than those required by the law. Contact ICMA for a copy of the Code of Ethics.
Council would need to vote to put the issue on the ballot. If enacted by the people of Edmonds a
Council-manager form of government would be immediately upon certification of the election.
The following are in the City Manager Document attachment:
Michael Plunkett editorial
Municipal Research Center Comparing/Contrasting
Municipal Research Center Forms of Government Overview
Municipal Research Center Process for Reorganization
Revised Code of Washington Title 35
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: City Manager Documents
Link: 2010-2011 Election Dates
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/09/2010 11:38 AM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/09/2010 01:32 PM APRV
Packet Page 274 of 304
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 09:15 AM APRV
Form Started By: Jana
Spellman
Started On: 06/08/2010 02:53
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 275 of 304
Packet Page 276 of 304
Packet Page 277 of 304
Packet Page 278 of 304
Packet Page 279 of 304
Packet Page 280 of 304
Packet Page 281 of 304
Packet Page 282 of 304
Packet Page 283 of 304
Packet Page 284 of 304
Packet Page 285 of 304
Packet Page 286 of 304
Packet Page 287 of 304
Packet Page 288 of 304
This guide is for informational purpose only and does not take the place of local, state or federal laws. RCW, WAC and county code
notations are offered as a reference for additional research only.
3
Election Dates & Resolution Due Dates for 2010
(RCW 29A.04.311, 321)
2010 Dates of Election Resolution Due Dates
February 9, 2010 December 23, 2009 (45 day cutoff)
April 27, 2010 March 12, 2010 (45 day cutoff)
May 18, 2010 * April 2, 2010 (45 day cutoff)
August 17, 2010 May 25, 2010 (84 day cutoff)
November 2, 2010 August 10, 2010 (84 day cutoff)
* For tax levies that have previously failed in the calendar year or new bond issues
Major Political Party Information
Democratic Party Headquarters
Party Chair - William Phillips
4405 95th St NE, Marysville WA 98270 (360) 572-0073
Republican Party Headquarters
Party Chair - James Kellett
514 State Ave, Ste 109, Marysville WA 98270 (360) 653-1100
Election Dates & Resolution Due Dates for 2011
(RCW 29A.04.311, 321)
2011 Dates of Election Resolution Due Dates
February 8, 2011 December 22, 2010 (45 day cutoff)
April 26, 2011 March 11, 2011 (45 day cutoff)
May 17, 2011 * April 1, 2011 (45 day cutoff)
August 16, 2011 May 24, 2011 (84 day cutoff)
November 8, 2011 August 16, 2011 (84 day cutoff)
* For tax levies that have previously failed in the calendar year or new bond issues
Packet Page 289 of 304
AM-3145 13.
Request for Comprehensive Plan Submittal Date Exception
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Submitted For:Councilmember Peterson Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action
Review Committee:Community/Development Services
Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council
Information
Subject Title
Request for Comprehensive Plan submittal date exception.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
On June 8, 2010 a request was made at the Community Services/Development Services
Committee to ask Council to consider making an exception to the December 2009 deadline for
Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Committee is forwarding the request to full Council for
consideration.
Narrative
Edmonds has traditionally required all Comprehensive Plan adjustment requests be filed by
December for consideration for the following year. Due to varying circumstances, including the
economic downturn and it's continued effects, an exception to the deadline is being requested.
This is an exception to the deadline only, and all other requirements, public hearings, etc. will be
adhered to.
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: Exhibit: Request for Exception to Submittal Date
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 02:03 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/10/2010 01:50
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 290 of 304
18105 Sunset Way Edmonds, WA 98026-5331 tonys@adshapiro.com 425.778.5400
June 8, 2010
Edmonds City Council
c/o Mr. Strom Peterson
Community Development Subcommittee
Subject: Request for Council Approval for Exception to the Submittal Date for of Comp Plan application
This is a request to open the “Comp Plan application window” to assist a local medical
provider address the circumstances brought about by the economic downturn facing our
national and regional economies. An outline of our request is followed by a more in depth
history of the events leading up to this request:
1. This application will not be “sidestepping” the full public review process required for
land use changes, if this request is granted. It is simply requesting that an application
for comp plan change for 2010 be accepted after December 31, 2009.
2. The specific economic circumstance behind this request revolve around an initial site
on 212th SW having been taken back by Frontier Bank, and now its successor, Union
Bank of California, (see footnote 1, below).
3. We have been working with Planning Staff, Citizens Economic Development
Commission, and holding neighborhood meeting(s), since February of this year
regarding this block fronting on 220th SW within the Medical/Highway 99 Activity
Center, (see footnote 2 below).
4. Our clients’, (Kruger Orthopedic Clinic), current lease expires in 2012, and need to
relocate in order to meet the current and future needs of its patients. As a long time
Edmonds business, whose principals live in Edmonds, they are highly motivated to
keep their business in Edmonds. Yet, the lack of available site(s), is forcing them to
consider other options outside of Edmonds.
5. As a desired sustainable economic business type, this action may encourage further
medical business growth for Edmonds as we compete with other parts of our region
for medical investments and will indirectly show council support to Swedish Medical
Center as they move toward a closer relationship with Stevens Hospital. .
Packet Page 291 of 304
Footnotes:
1. The initial site that was slated for this client is at 212th & 72nd, directly west of Allied
Roofing Supplies. This site has become “mired” in Frontier Bank’s being controlled
by the Fed, and the seller is going into bankruptcy. Our client is looking for another
site in the neighborhood, and the site on 220th has been put under contract.
2. Last August, the seller of the 220th Street site was contacted about changing the comp
plan, but they did not have the funds to begin this process. At that time Rob Chave
mentioned that the long range plan of the city is for this stretch of 220th to become a
commercial type use, especially since the upgrade to 220th occurred a few years ago.
At the February and March Citizen Economic Development Commission meetings,
(prior to the site being “tied up”), Mr. Shapiro asked the commission to consider this
block as a candidate for commercial use to support the Swedish Medical Center’s
involvement with Steven’s Hospital. There are two initial neighborhood meetings
scheduled at Edmonds Woodway High, (the first of which was held on May 24), to
brief the neighbors on the comp plan review and approval process, and ask for their
input. See the attached PDF flyer sent out to neighbors within 300’ of the block.
Attachments:
1. Portion of the Edmonds Comp Plan Map.
2. Flyers sent to neighbors
Packet Page 292 of 304
Packet Page 293 of 304
co
m
p
p
l
a
n
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
29
4
of
30
4
With Swedish Medical Center assuming man-
agement of Stevens Hospital, (soon to be re-
named, Swedish/Edmonds), there is a growing
need for area in and around Stevens Hospital to
support the expanding Medical Community.
In response to this we are proposing to
modify the comprehensive plan for the block
bounded by 220th/218th and 76th/80th, to
be in alignment with the blocks to the north
and east, which are Mixed Use Commercial.
We are working with the Citizens Economic
Development Commission, and City Plan-
ning Staff to this update. We are seeking your
input, and thoughts, and concerns in two
neighborhood meetings, May 24, and June
21, where we will explain the formal public
approval process. If you are unable to attend,
please e-mail your thoughts, to Mr. Shapiro.
Neighborhood Meeting
Come discuss proposed
Comprehensive Plan
Modifi cation to 220th Street SW
BLOCK UNDER CONSIDERATION
BOUNDARY OF MEDICAL
USE ACTIVITY CENTER
220th SW
76
t
h
Av
e
W
Date/Time/Location
On: Monday May 24, 7:00 PM
Monday June 21, 7:00 PM
At: Edmonds Woodway High School
Room F104
Hosted By: A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
tonys@adshapiro.com
425.778.5400
Packet Page 295 of 304
18105 Sunset Way
Edmonds, WA 98026
Within the activity center, policies to achieve these goals include the following:
A.1. Provide street trees, buffers, and landscape treatments...
A.2. Provide a more ef cient transportation system...
A.3. Development should be designed for both pedestrian and transit access...
A.4. Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, of ce, and service businesses, supported by nearby residents and visitors from
other parts of the region...
A.5. Support a mix of uses without encroaching into single family neighborhoods...
A.6. Uses adjoining the Highway 99 Corridor should provide more intensive levels of mixed use development...
A.7. In some cases, heavy commercial development (e.g. wholesale or light industrial uses) may still be appropriate where these uses are sepa-
rated from residential uses...
For more information visit:
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/plan_ref.stm
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Modifi cation
Abbreviated Goals for the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center
2009 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, pp: 59
Packet Page 296 of 304
Please consider attending an informational
neighborhood meeting regarding the pro-
posed land use revision to this portion of
220th SW. We are proposing to modify the
comprehensive plan for the block bounded
by 220th/218th and 76th/80th, to be in
alignment with the blocks to the north and
east, which are Mixed Use Commercial.
We are working with the Citizens Economic
Development Commission, and City Plan-
ning Staff on this update. We are seeking
your input, and thoughts, and concerns
in a series of neighborhood meetings, the
next of which will be held on June 21. If
you are unable to attend, please e-mail Mr.
Shapiro with your thoughts or questions.
Neighborhood Meeting
Come discuss proposed
Comprehensive Plan
Modifi cation to 220th Street SW
BLOCK UNDER CONSIDERATION
BOUNDARY OF MEDICAL
USE ACTIVITY CENTER
220th SW
76
t
h
Av
e
W
Date/Time/Location
On: Monday June 21, 7:00 PM
At: Edmonds Woodway High School
Room F104
Hosted By: A.D. Shapiro Architects, PS
tonys@adshapiro.com
425.778.5400
Packet Page 297 of 304
18105 Sunset Way
Edmonds, WA 98026
Within the activity center, policies to achieve these goals include the following:
A.1. Provide street trees, buff ers, and landscape treatments...
A.2. Provide a more effi cient transportation system...
A.3. Development should be designed for both pedestrian and transit access...
A.4. Encourage a more active and vital setting for new retail, offi ce, and service businesses, supported by nearby residents and visitors from
other parts of the region...
A.5. Support a mix of uses without encroaching into single family neighborhoods...
A.6. Uses adjoining the Highway 99 Corridor should provide more intensive levels of mixed use development...
A.7. In some cases, heavy commercial development (e.g. wholesale or light industrial uses) may still be appropriate where these uses are sepa-
rated from residential uses...
For more information visit:
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/plan_ref.stm
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Modifi cation
Abbreviated Goals for the Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center
2009 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, pp: 59
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Modifi cation
Packet Page 298 of 304
AM-3146 14.
Report on City Council Committee Meetings
Edmonds City Council Meeting
Date:06/15/2010
Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:15 Minutes
Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Information
Review Committee:
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Report on City Council Committee Meetings of June 8, 2010.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached are copies of the following City Council Committee Meeting Minutes from June 8, 2010:
•06-08-10 Community Services/Development Services Committee
•06-08-10 Finance Committee
•06-08-10 Public Safety Committee
Fiscal Impact
Attachments
Link: 06-08-10 CS/DS Committee
Link: 06-08-10 Finance Committee
Link: 06-08-10 Public Safety Committee
Form Routing/Status
Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status
1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 02:50 PM APRV
2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 06/10/2010 04:46 PM APRV
3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 06/10/2010 04:53 PM APRV
Form Started By: Sandy
Chase
Started On: 06/10/2010 02:07
PM
Final Approval Date: 06/10/2010
Packet Page 299 of 304
M I N U T E S
Community Service/Development Services Committee Meeting
June 8, 2010
Elected Officials Present: Staff Present:
Council Member Strom Peterson, Chair Rob Chave, Planning Manager
The committee convened at 6:35 p.m.
A. Presentation by A.D. Shapiro Architects regarding possible Comprehensive Plan
modification to 220th Street SW.
Easton Craft, Tony Shapiro, and Kathleen Taylor presented information on a potential
comprehensive plan map amendment that they would like to file with the city. The proposal involves
a medical clinic – Kruger Orthopedics – which is currently located near Stevens Hospital. Because of
market conditions and changes in the health care environment (e.g. the Stevens / Swedish merger)
and the need for the existing business to find a location to expand, they need to have a proposal
considered by the city during 2010. Otherwise the city’s application deadlines would not enable a
plan change to be considered until late in 2011, which would not allow the business to meet its
needs and remain in the city. The area they are considering is within the same Medical/Highway 99
Activity Center that they are currently in, near Stevens Hospital.
ACTION: The Committee agreed to forward the proposal to the full Council for consideration.
The Committee meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m.
Packet Page 300 of 304
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
June 8, 2010
6:00 PM
R:\COUNCIL\FINANCE COMMITTEE\06-08-2010\6-08-10 MINUTES.DOCX
Present: Mayor Gary Haakenson
Councilmember Plunkett
Councilmember Buckshnis
Staff: Lorenzo Hines Jr., Director, Finance and Information Services
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Douglas Fair, Municipal Court Judge
Rob English, City Engineer
Public: Natalie Shippen Diana Tallmadge
Ron Wambolt Finis Tupper
Carl Brecht Phil Williams
Roger Hertrich Chal Martin
Nihat Dogan, FCS Group
Councilmember Plunkett called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
A. Proposed interlocal agreement with the City of Lynnwood for video Court hearings.
Judge Fair presented the interlocal agreement, the justification for entering into the
agreement, and answered questions on same. The committee voted to place the issue on
the consent agenda.
A. General Fund update for May 2010
Lorenzo Hines presented revenue and expenditure trends for the General Fund and
current forecasts for the City’s major revenue sources. For information only, no further
action required.
B. Revision to City's Water Leakage Policy
Lorenzo Hines responded to follow up questions regarding the responsibilities of the
homeowner and the city in regards to residential and commercial water supply
infrastructure. The committee voted to place the issue on the consent agenda.
C. Review of water and storm water financial rate proposals
Noel Miller presented the current water and storm water rate proposal to the committee
and answered questions on same. Nihat Dogan also provided additional information to
the committee. The committee voted to forward to full council for review.
D. Public Comments (3-minute limit per person)
Comments and questions were provided that pertain to the Edmonds multimodal project;
the city water leakage policy; and water and sewer rates.
Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 PM.
Packet Page 301 of 304
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 8, 2010
Page 1 of 3
Minutes
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 8, 2010
Elected Officials Present: Council Member D. J. Wilson, Committee
Chair
Council Member Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Staff Present: Municipal Court Judge Douglas J. Fair
Fire Marshal John Westfall
The meeting was called to order by Chair Wilson at 6:45 p.m. The Committee
and Fire Marshal Westfall allowed Judge Fair to proceed first, as his item was
also being heard by the Finance Committee.
B. Proposed Interlocal Agreement with the City of Lynnwood for Video
Court Hearings
Judge Fair presented the proposed interlocal agreement with the City of
Lynnwood. Under the agreement Lynnwood would use Edmonds court facilities
and video equipment for in custody hearings for Lynnwood prisoners at
Snohomish County Jail. Judge Fair cited costs and security issues when
prisoners need to be transported between jail and court. Councilmember Wilson
suggested that liability be addressed for any damages to equipment as part of
the agreement. Judge Fair agreed to add a clause to the agreement. The
videotaping will not commence until August. The Public Safety Committee
agreed by a vote of 2-0 to move this item to City Council consent agenda.
Action: Forward to City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to
approve.
A. Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems (RFSS) options discussion.
All modifications to requirements for construction for residential dwellings is
directed by the International Residential Code (IRC) through the State Building
Code Council. IRC Appendix S permits every Washington State city and county
to set threshold for installation of fire sprinklers in new home construction. Fire
code currently allows requirement of residential sprinklers when public water
availability, size of structure and setback from public access do not meet
minimum standards.
Thresholds were presented in code formatted language by FM Westfall as
directed by Public Safety Committee for; 1) all new dwelling construction, 2)
Packet Page 302 of 304
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 8, 2010
Page 2 of 3
3,000 square feet (s.f.) dwellings and greater, and 3) 5,000 s.f. and greater
construction.
Councilmember Wilson asked regarding addition/remodel requirements to be
included with ordinance. FM Westfall had discussed with Planning Manager Rob
Chave and Building Official Leonard Yarberry in that regard. A variety of
“triggers” may be used for remodel thresholds for dwellings including; additions of
any size of fire area, additions whenever greater than a threshold limit, additions
greater than a percentage of square footage, and remodel/addition projects as a
percentage of the structure’s assessed valuation sometimes calculated over a
period of months or years. All of these means are employed by other Washington
cities with their sprinkler ordinances. FM Westfall suggested that if a
addition/remodel requirement is utilized, that it be simple to use and available
through projects in design phase. Easy calculations both for applicant and
development services personnel speed the administration of the permit. A
reliable, objective threshold provides little or no variability for argument. Staff
recommends a solid threshold matching the addition for all residential projects
greater than the threshold limit decided for new construction.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas believes this will be unfavorable when such a
great rate of upgrade is disproportionate to a small amount of work performed.
Councilmember Wilson concurred. FM Westfall will prepare the ordinances
without addition/remodel thresholds.
With the approval of a RFSS ordinance by IRC Appendix S, FM Westfall
identified a gapped sprinkler protection for Townhouses less than five units,
currently the multi-unit threshold for IRC townhouses from Title 19.25.040 ECDC.
This gapped range of townhouse construction provides the “affordability” area of
development. Small multiple builders of the community directly expressed
concerns about zero threshold sprinkler requirements in all residential projects in
the current state of economy.
At least one state is delaying implementation of state-wide RFSS requirements
until 1/1/2012, until the economy improves.
Previous committee discussions suggested incentives through creative
management of traffic impact fees to provide developers with later deadline in
which to pay impact fees and more interest-bearing time for developer. FM
Westfall recommends that RFSS incentives apply to single-family builders and
relate directly or indirectly to fire protection concerns for the structure. Efforts
continue to identify local incentives including design standard changes and
reduction of water service costs. State and federal income tax efforts are also
being pursued by fire prevention advocates.
In July the Council will be involved with mayoral selections. Councilmember
Wilson directed FM Westfall to bring RFSS item back for August Public Safety
Packet Page 303 of 304
Public Safety Committee Meeting
June 8, 2010
Page 3 of 3
Committee meeting. He asked for a list of names and addresses of the
stakeholder groups, including representatives from State and county Fire Chiefs,
Fire Marshals, Master Builders, local builder/developers, firefighter’s labor union,
and industry professionals. Letters will be sent for invitation to the forum during
this August 10 meeting. Three options will be provided for new residential fire
sprinkler system at the three threshold levels without remodel requirements. Here
we intend to find agreement to serve the best interests of the Edmonds
community.
Action: Staff was directed to bring this item back to the August Public Safety
Committee meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
Packet Page 304 of 304