Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2010.07.20 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA Edmonds City Council Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds ______________________________________________________________ JULY 20, 2010 7:00 p.m. Call to Order and Flag Salute 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. AM-3212 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 6, 2010. C. AM-3214 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 13, 2010. D. AM-3217 Approval of claim checks #119892 through #120038 dated July 8, 2010 for $366,414.62, and checks #120039 through #120178 dated July 15, 2010 for $499,864.00. E. AM-3211 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Marie M. Rosemund ($10,000.00). F. AM-3221 Acceptance of the list of businesses dated 07-09-10 due to renew liquor licenses with the Washington State Liquor Control Board. G. AM-3206 Authorization for Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement for the Smart Commuter Project Grant between Community Transit and the City of Edmonds. H. AM-3215 Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of section 7.50.050 Rates and Charges, section A, relating to stormwater rates in order to increase the rates, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. I. AM-3216 Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of section 7.30.030 of the Edmonds City Code relating to water rates, sections A and B thereof in order to increase such rates, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. J. AM-3223 Proposed Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3685 and 3733 to establish the salary of the Mayor at $113,209.92 for any person elected or appointed to the position on or after the effective date of this ordinance. 3. AM-3219 (5 Minutes) Community Service Announcement - Edmonds Film Festival International. 4. AM-3175 (30 Minutes) Public hearing to seek public comment on a proposed change to a City Manager-Council form of government. 5. AM-3213 Public hearing on adoption of an Ordinance prohibiting certain uses of Polystyrene and Packet Page 1 of 208 5. AM-3213 (45 Minutes) Public hearing on adoption of an Ordinance prohibiting certain uses of Polystyrene and non-recyclable materials as disposable food packaging and requiring instead the use of recyclable or compostable materials. 6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed record Review or as Public Hearings. 7. AM-3218 (60 Minutes) Appointment to fill the vacant position of Mayor. 8. (5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments 9. (15 Minutes)Council Comments ADJOURN Packet Page 2 of 208 AM-3212 2.B. Approve 07-06-10 City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 6, 2010. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 07-06-10 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 08:43 AM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 07/15/2010 08:41 AM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 3 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES July 6, 2010 At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Bernstein announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding pending and threatened litigation. He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 60 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim, and Councilmembers Plunkett, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, and Peterson. Councilmember Wilson arrived at 6:18 p.m. Others present were City Attorney Scott Snyder, Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton, Public Works Director Phil Williams, and City Clerk Sandy Chase. City Engineer Rob English joined the executive session at 6: 43 p.m. The executive session concluded at 7:03 p.m. The regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Steve Bernheim, Mayor Pro Tem Strom Peterson, Council President Pro Tem D. J. Wilson, Councilmember Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember (seated at 7:37 p.m.) STAFF PRESENT Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director Noel Miller, Public Works Director Phil Williams, Public Works Director Lorenzo Hines, Finance Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Eng. Program Mgr. Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager Carl Nelson, CIO Rob English, City Engineer Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO ADD “REMOVAL OF TREE AT 3RD & WALNUT” AS AGENDA ITEM 12A. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 4 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 2 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item I be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON, MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 22, 2010. C. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 29, 2010. D. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #119672 THROUGH #119798 DATED JUNE 24, 2010 FOR $644,648.20, AND #119799 THROUGH #119891 DATED JULY 1, 2010 FOR $365,466.77. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #49466 THROUGH #49538 FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 16 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2010 FOR $716,329.76. E. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM SHIRLEY A. MCCABE ($300.00). F. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR PRO TEM TO SIGN CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR SR 99 HIGHWAY ENHANCEMENTS AGREEMENT FOR COMMISSIONING ART WORK. G. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR PRO TEM TO SIGN AN AMENDMENT TO THE RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT, NO. G1000397, BETWEEN THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS. H. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR PRO TEM TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT #15 FOR REPAIRS, MAINTENANCE AND SCHEDULING OF PLAYFIELDS AT MADRONA NON- GRADED K-8 SCHOOL. J. ACCEPTANCE OF MAYOR HAAKENSON'S RESIGNATION EFFECTIVE JULY 2, 2010. ITEM I: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF SEATTLE RELATING TO EXCESS CAPACITY OF HIGH SPEED FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. Councilmember Buckshnis requested an update from staff regarding the fiber optic business plan. Finance Director Lorenzo Hines explained a number of target opportunities have been identified. Members of an Economic Development Commission subcommittee will conduct a cost-benefit and marketing analysis of those targets. Once he has reviewed their analysis, the potential targets of opportunity will be presented to the Council. He explained these opportunities will set the framework for pursuing other opportunities and the experience with these targets will facilitate development of an overall business plan. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim asked how this related to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), an agreement between the City Edmonds and the City of Seattle for Edmonds to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred in the fiber optic court case. Mr. Hines explained on October 22, 2009, the City was granted a Packet Page 5 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 3 summary judgment which allowed Edmonds to commercialize and utilize its fiber optics assets. At that time Edmonds was the only city in the State allowed to do so; other jurisdictions in Washington would like to have the opportunity to utilize their fiber optic assets including Seattle. Seattle approached Edmonds requesting assistance with their efforts to gain access to commercial utilization of their fiber assets. The MOU states Seattle will pay all the costs associated with Edmonds’ assistance. Councilmember Wilson referred to Section 3 of the MOU that states Edmonds will pay for appellant appeal costs. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained this type of litigation, a declaratory judgment action, was odd in that the City was seeking to establish a precedence for bond purposes and the City paid both sides of the litigation. Section 3 states Seattle will not pay the appellant’s costs. Councilmember Wilson asked for clarification of Mr. Hines’ statement that Edmonds will not pay anything and the statement in the MOU that Seattle will pay their costs but will not pay the appellant’s costs. Mr. Hines explained Seattle’s costs would be for the defense, Edmonds’ costs would be for the appellant. He explained the appellant costs are included in the budget; the intent of the MOU was to minimize costs above those budgeted. Councilmember Wilson asked why Edmonds was appealing when the City won the case. Mr. Hines explained via the appellate process, the case can be opened and other entities allowed to enjoy the same rights granted Edmonds. The goal of the appellate action is for the judge to grant the rights that were granted to Edmonds to other jurisdictions. Councilmember Wilson asked if appealing the judgment opened the City to some risk and if there was a chance the judgment could be overruled. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim advised the case had already been appealed. Councilmember Wilson asked when the Council took the position to appeal a case in which the City had been victorious. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim recalled that direction had been given during executive session. Mr. Snyder explained the MOU was to accept $50,000 from Seattle. He offered to provide the Council the summary minutes from the executive session when that direction was provided. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON, TO APPROVE ITEM I. Councilmember Wilson advised he would vote against the motion because he did not have a complete understanding of why the City was taking this action. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim explained the action in the appellate court was to provide precedential value so that Edmonds’ decision will not be overturned by a later court action when another city sought the same rights. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER WILSON VOTING NO. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim requested Item 6 follow Agenda Items 7 and 8. The Council concurred with his request. 3. COMMUNITY SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - TASTE OF EDMONDS Craig Cooke, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, provided the Council a press release and entertainment lineup for the August 13-15 Taste of Edmonds. He explained tens of thousands of people attend the Taste, the largest festival in Snohomish County and the second largest in the State. The Taste provides funding that allows the Chamber to sponsor over $20,000 in community programs and services He described the economic benefit of the Taste to the Edmonds community and the 200+ volunteers who Packet Page 6 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 4 make the event possible. This year’s Taste includes 70 arts and crafts booths and 40 food booths as well as entertainment. He invited Councilmembers to serve as judges in this year’s Taste Off. Admission is $3, children under 12 years of age are free and no pets are allowed. Further information is available at the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce website, www.Edmondswa.com. He commented even in this down economy, they have obtained over $100,000 in sponsorships and there will be several national tours at the Taste including Microsoft Xbox 360 Connect, Dunkin Donuts, Verizon’s NASCAR show car, Burt’s Bees as well as J.P. Patches & Stan Boreson. Council President Pro Tem Peterson pointed out the proceeds from the Taste assist the Chamber with funding community events such as the Tree Lighting, Car Show, 4th of July parade/fireworks as well as benefits many service clubs. 4. PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING JULY AS PARKS & RECREATION MONTH. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim read a proclamation designating July as Parks & Recreation month. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she has been involved in the Adopt a Park Program and encouraged citizens to participate in that program. 5. APPOINTMENT TO FILL CITY COUNCIL VACANCY. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim read the rules for nomination/election to fill a Council vacancy: each Councilmember may nominate one candidate from the list of applicants by placing an “X” beside the name of the applicant of his or her choice on the form supplied for that purpose by the City Clerk, and by signing the nomination form. The City Clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of the nominations and of the Councilmember nominating each candidate. Each Councilmember may vote for one candidate by placing an “X” beside the name of the candidate of his or her choice on the ballot supplied for that purpose by the City Clerk, and by signing the ballot. The City Clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of each ballot and who voted for each candidate. Deputy City Clerk Linda Hynd distributed the first nomination ballot to Councilmembers. Those nominated were: Paul Anderson (Councilmember Fraley-Monillas), Frank Demme (Councilmember Plunkett), Lora Petso (Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim and Councilmember Buckshnis), Frank Yamamoto (Council President Pro Tem Peterson), and Todd Cloutier (Councilmember Wilson). Vote No. 1 was taken. The results were: one vote for Frank Demme (Councilmember Plunkett), two votes for Lora Petso (Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim and Councilmember Buckshnis), one vote for Paul Anderson (Councilmember Fraley-Monillas), one vote for Frank Yamamoto (Council President Pro Tem Peterson), and one vote for Todd Cloutier (Councilmember Wilson). Council President Pro Tem Peterson disclosed that Mr. Yamamoto was a friend, had contributed to his campaign and would be an excellent choice to fill the Council vacancy. Councilmember Wilson advised he knew and considered approximately three-fourths of the candidates as friends. He disclosed Mr. Anderson may have contributed to his campaign; he supported Mr. Cloutier’s wife in her past Council campaign; Mr. Cloutier and he participated on a board together; Ms. Petso endorsed him and her son-in-law has been one of his supporters as well as an employee of his business. Packet Page 7 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 5 Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim reported he contributed to Ms. Petso’s campaign and Mr. Hertrich contributed to his campaign. Vote No. 2 was taken. The results were: one vote for Frank Demme (Councilmember Plunkett), three votes for Lora Petso (Councilmembers Wilson and Buckshnis and Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim), one vote for Frank Yamamoto (Council President Pro Tem Peterson), and one vote for Paul Anderson (Councilmember Fraley-Monillas). Vote No. 3 was taken. The results were: two votes for Paul Anderson (Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Peterson), and four votes for Lora Petso (Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim and Councilmembers Wilson, Plunkett and Buckshnis). Administration of Oath of Office City Clerk Sandy Chase swore in Ms. Petso and Councilmember Petso took her seat at the dais. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked all the applicants, commenting there were many fine citizens interested in being involved. She urged them to run for office in the future. She also thanked City Clerk Sandy Chase and Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman for preparing and sending her the packet and DVD of the interviews when she was out of town last week and unable to participate in the interviews. She commented on the difficulty of selecting one person from the pool of 17 original applicants. Council President Pro Tem Peterson commented on the outstanding group of applicants. He encouraged them to file to run for office, get involved in a campaign or attend Council meetings. Councilmember Wilson commented he was also out of town last week when the interviews were conducted. He explained the Council had three Tuesdays per year, the fifth Tuesday of the month, when no meeting is scheduled and he had made plans to be out of town. He also had an opportunity to watch the interviews and echoed Council President Pro Tem Peterson’s comments regarding the qualifications of the candidates. To him, the most important characteristic in the appointment process was whether that person had previously run for office. If a person was willing to endure that process, it was likely they would work hard as a Councilmember. For that reason, he had supported former Councilmember Wambolt, Council President Pro Tem Peterson and now Councilmember Petso when they were candidates for appointment. Councilmember Buckshnis commented on the caliber of applicants, noting experience was important and Councilmember Petso provides that. Councilmember Petso thanked the Council for their support and looked forward to serving the citizens of Edmonds. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim echoed Council President Pro Tem Peterson’s comments regarding the applicants. 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE STORM AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. Stormwater Engineer Program Manager Jerry Shuster explained the public process began in May when the first draft of the Plan was posted on the City’s website. The Plan is currently under review by the Department of Commerce as part of their 60-day review period which began on June 7. Two meetings Packet Page 8 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 6 were held with the Planning Board including a public hearing on June 9 a SEPA Determination of Non- Significance was issued on June 3 and the Plan was introduced to the City Council on June 22. Mr. Shuster described the Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan: • An element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan • Guides the operation of the City’s Storm and Surface Water Utility, a fee for service utility that conveys stormwater off property as well as roads • Assists the City in complying with applicable federal, state and local regulations • Identifies and proposes solutions to known flooding, water quality and habitat issues • Details actions necessary to comply with regulatory requirements, especially the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit, an unfunded mandate • Presents an operation and maintenance plan, capital improvement plan and financial plan to address known problems and compliance with federal, state and local regulations The Plan needs to be updated for the following reasons: • The last Plan was completed in 2003 prior to the effective date of the Phase II Permit • Re-prioritization of capital projects based on accomplishments and new issues • Goals and policies in the City’s Comprehensive Plan last updated in 1985 are outdated Programmatic elements in the Plan are largely driven by requirements of the Phase II Permit: • Review of development submittals for compliance with the City’s Stormwater Code • Inspect and maintain publicly-owned and operated detention and water quality systems • Inspect and track maintenance of privately-owned and operated detention and water quality systems • Illicit discharge detection and elimination program – proactive program to find illicit dischargers • Public education and outreach program • Monitoring Mr. Shuster emphasized the programmatic elements in the plan to ensure compliance with the Phase II Permit Program requires additional staff. The plan asks for one additional FTE in engineering and one additional FTE in Public Works. The Plan also includes capital projects that are divided into two tiers. Tier 1 projects provide a basic or essential level of service from the Stormwater Utility and address long standing reoccurring flooding issues. The 17 Tier 1 projects over the next 6 years total approximately $8 million. The rate structure as proposed would 100% fund the Tier 1 projects. The four Tier 2 projects cost 3 times as much as the 17 Tier 1 projects. Tier 2 projects are scheduled to begin in 2014 and are anticipated to be 25% rate funded and 75% from outside sources (as yet unsecured). Mr. Shuster displayed a map identifying the location of the proposed capital projects, noting several are in the vicinity of Perrinville Creek, southwest Edmonds and the waterfront/marsh area. A rate adjustment is necessary due to increased service levels to comply with the Phase II Permit. He emphasized the City would not be providing the same service for more money; more service would be provided in return for the rate increase. Staff recommends the following increase in rates, commenting it was the minimum necessary to comply with the Phase II Permit: (Includes Tier 2 Projects) Current 2010 2011 2012 Adjustment/month 66¢ 72¢ 78¢ $/month $8.31 $8.97 $9.69 $10.47 Packet Page 9 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 7 Mr. Shuster provided a comparison of 2010 single family residential stormwater utility rates for 10 comparable cities that illustrated the highest (Redmond) at $16.56 and the lowest (Lynnwood) at $6.70. The proposed Edmonds Tier 1 funding scenario is $8.93/month and $8.97 for the Tier 2 funding scenario. He explained the 2010 average rate was $10.61; Edmonds’ proposed rate in 2012 of $10.47 would still be lower than the current average. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out WIRA 8’s indication that day lighting of Willow Creek may be moved from their ten year plan to their three year plan with only a 15% match. She asked whether the Planning Board’s recommendation to move the Flood Plain Delineation from 2012 to 2011 was reflected in the Plan. Mr. Shuster answered it was not; however, projects could easily be moved. If the Flood Plain Delineation were moved to 2011, he recommended moving Project 8, North Talbot Road Improvement Project, from 2011 to 2012. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed her support for the Planning Board’s recommendation to move up the Flood Plain Delineation. Councilmember Buckshnis observed FTEs were embedded in the rate structure. She asked if that was common, suggesting salaries should be General Fund expenditures. Mr. Shuster explained all activities related to the Stormwater Utility, including the new position, must be funded via the stormwater rate. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether his salary was funded via the stormwater rate. Mr. Shuster answered it was. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested distributing educational materials via utility bills. Mr. Shuster explained that has been discussed and was on his list of projects that could be accomplished once another person was hired. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the cost of each FTE and their duties. Mr. Shuster answered the position in Engineering would be an Engineering Tech; the salary range is $4000-4800/month plus benefits. The primary duties of the Engineer Tech would be the illicit discharge detection and elimination. He anticipated this effort would begin in commercial areas in areas of the system where there were older connections. The position would also assist him with public education and outreach and monitoring as well as work with Public Works on inspections. He explained the recordkeeping associated with monitoring is extensive. Public Works Director Noel Miller explained the Public Works position would be a Maintenance Worker I; the starting salary for that position is $45,000/year. The duties would be to assist with the maintenance program as well as work with private property owners on annual inspection of their stormwater systems. Staff has identified approximately 400 systems in the City and anticipates there are more. A further survey will be conducted to identify other systems and place them on an annual inspection schedule. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim relayed staff’s recommendation to approve the Storm and Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan Update including both the Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital projects. He opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the average salary for police and fire personnel is $61,000/year compared to the salary quoted for the Maintenance Worker I salary of $45,000/year. Next, he reported on the Planning Board meetings where they discussed the Flood Plain Delineation and funding for improvements on Lake Ballinger. He reported 35 new homes being constructed on Halls Lake in Lynnwood will increase drainage into Lake Ballinger. He pointed out the Plan includes $42,000/year for stormwater improvements on Lake Ballinger and requested that be increased to $84,000. The Lake Ballinger Forum has been discussing improvements but has no funding. Packet Page 10 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 8 Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, agreed with Mr. Rutledge that funding needed to be included in the Plan for stormwater improvements on Lake Ballinger. He referred to the $16 million expenditure for Tier 2 projects, commenting only the government was creating jobs because they had the ability to tax the public. He objected to the proposal to increase the number of employees when development was down. He also objected to the proposed 25% increase in water rates. He expressed concern with the Tier 2 expenditures for the Edmonds Marsh, suggesting improvements could be made to the marsh more slowly. He referred to a project in Perrinville and suggested Lynnwood be encouraged to contribute to that project. Until the economy improved, he recommended the City not add any employees. Todd Cloutier, Edmonds, referred to the Planning Board’s recommendation to move project 2A, the 100 Year Flood Plain Study, explaining that completing the study now would support waterfront development and avoid any surprises when waterfront development plans are submitted. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. With regard to Lake Ballinger, Mr. Shuster explained the City has been involved for the past 3-4 years via the Lake Ballinger Forum with the five other jurisdictions that have a watershed that drains into Lake Ballinger. The Forum is slowly moving toward addressing water quality and flooding issues. He emphasized it had taken 40-50 years for Lake Ballinger to reach its current condition and it would not be completely rectified in 2-3 years, it will take a long time to fix the problem. The Forum is currently seeking additional funding sources. Until the Forum decides what they want to do, the $42,000/year in the Plan is a placeholder for projects that arise. Once the Forum decides what they want to do, the amount can be adjusted. With regard to the Planning Board’s recommendation regarding Project 2A, the Flood Plain Delineation, Mr. Shuster explained that project could easily be moved from 2012 to 2011 and Project 8 moved from 2011 to 2012. With regard to staffing, Mr. Miller agreed development review is down currently. However, staff’s efforts have been diverted to a number of park, walkway and utility projects with funding from Parks and Utility budgets. He explained 10 years ago, there were 10 FTEs in Engineering and a population of slightly less than 30,000. Ten years later there are still 10 FTEs with a 25% increase in the population. The mandates as a result of the Phase II Permit require hiring additional staff. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim summarized there will be additional work to be done. With regard to the Flood Plain Delineation, Mr. Miller advised if a majority of the Council wished, the CIP could be revised to move the Study from 2012 to 2011 and to move Project 8 from 2011 to 2012. With regard to Lake Ballinger capital improvements, Councilmember Wilson agreed the Lake Ballinger Forum was moving forward slowly. There were six members of the Forum: Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, Lake Forest Park, Shoreline, Snohomish County and Lynnwood. Lynwood recently decided to leave the Forum. He noted Mountlake Terrace has $250,000 in their budget for Lake Ballinger; Lake Forest Park as $450,000 and Edmonds has $25,000. He recalled the City spent $25,000 on a project associated with Lake Ballinger, directing runoff from the new impervious surfaces of the Interurban Trails into a detention pond. He suggested increasing funding of Lake Ballinger associated projects that have a direct impact on water quality. Councilmember Plunkett referred to the proposed stormwater and water rate increases in Agenda Item 6 and asked whether the Comprehensive Plans would need to be revised if the Council did not support the rate increases. Mr. Miller answered they were connected and if the Council did not support the proposed Packet Page 11 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 9 rate increases, the capital improvement programs in the Plans would need to be revised. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the GMA requires the City to identify a funding source for projects. If the Council did not support the rate increase to provide funding for the projects, the timing of projects would need to be changed or projects removed from the list. Councilmember Petso advised she had only been involved in the Water Comprehensive Plan and due to the complexity of the Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan and the proposed rate increases, she would abstain from the vote on those items. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented she understood the need for the rate increase but was concerned with increasing utility rates and hiring employees. She did not support hiring when the City was considering a levy and an increase in utility rates. Mr. Shuster explained the current stormwater rate was $8.31/month; of that $6.43 funds programs (people, operating machinery, and maintenance) and $1.88 funds capital projects. The additional FTEs are needed to increase operations and programs. Mr. Miller explained the City must comply with the Clean Water Act. If the City does not comply, it is vulnerable to legal action by outside parties. In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comments, Councilmember Buckshnis explained the Tier 2 projects total $16 million, the Edmonds Marsh restoration and day lighting of Willow Creek are estimated to cost $7 million of which the City would only pay $1,050,000 if funding is provided via WRIA 8. She noted if those projects are not completed, there will be a degradation of the existing system. Installation of the second track will include installation of culverts and it is appropriate to do those projects at the same time. Councilmember Plunkett referred to Mr. Miller’s comment regarding the City’s legal obligations and asked if the City was required to increase stormwater rates by 8% and water rates by 7.5% to address its legal obligations. Mr. Snyder explained the Clean Water Act is a strict liability statute; failure to maintain paperwork or file paperwork on time or filing incorrect paperwork is a violation regardless of the reason. He summarized the requested position will not only assist with cleaning catch basins and performance maintenance but will also free up time to fulfill the paperwork obligations that are a new requirement of the federal law. More work is required; it was not simply hiring another person to do the same work. Councilmember Plunkett observed neither Mr. Snyder nor Mr. Miller indicated the City would be in violation if rates were not increased by 25%. Mr. Snyder answered staff was proposing the additional positions in order to comply; he was unable to speak to the exact percentage. Councilmember Wilson explained at the Lake Ballinger Forum, there is a clear fact story with regard to litigation particularly from downstream communities. The reason Lake Forest Park has $450,000 in their budget is the water ends up near the fire station in Lake Forest Park adjacent to Lake Washington. Lake Forest Park feels there are only two remedies to the constant flooding – the Lake Ballinger Forum and litigation. He anticipated by not participating in the Forum, Lynnwood has placed itself in litigious jeopardy. Councilmember Wilson asked how the Council’s action on the Comprehensive Plans related to the CIP and implementation of the budget? He observed if the Council adopted the rate increase and adopted the Plan, the Council still had to vote on the budget to implement the Plan including the additional FTEs. He asked whether the Council was authorizing the FTEs via approving the Plan and rate increases tonight. Mr. Miller answered no, the Council would still need to take action on the FTEs. However, the Plan does indicate the need to hire two additional staff members. Councilmember Wilson advised a Councilmember could vote to approve the Plan and vote against hiring the additional employees in the future. Mr. Miller advised if that occurred, staff would need to determine another option to fulfill the Plan without additional staffing such as hiring staff on a contractual basis. Packet Page 12 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 10 With regard to why the staff positions were funded from the Utility Fund, Mr. Snyder explained by State law each utility fund was separate from the General Fund and required to bear its own costs. The General Fund cannot subsidize the Utility Fund and the Utility Fund cannot subsidize the General Fund. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the incremental changes in the rates: in 1999 the rate increased from $3.70, to $5.30 in 2002 and the next increase was to $6.41. She summarized there were significant increases in stormwater rates in the early 2000s. Mr. Miller explained those rate increases were necessary as the level of service for the stormwater system increased, both for staffing and equipment, to comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) approximately ten years ago. Councilmember Buckshnis summarized the proposed increase was to comply with the Clean Water Act. Mr. Miller agreed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO APPROVE THE UPDATE OF THE STORM AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT INCLUDES BOTH THE TIER 1 AND TIER 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE PROJECT 2A, THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN DELINEATION, FROM 2012 TO 2011 AND MOVE PROJECT 8, THE NORTH TALBOT ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, FROM 2011 TO 2012. AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-1- 1), COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. Council President Pro Tem Peterson commented that Edmonds has gotten a lot for its money for many years and will continue that in the future. He emphasized these projects are mandated by the federal government and are necessary to remain in compliance. If the City is not in compliance, it is open to litigation which likely would be even more costly. He pointed out the proposed rate increase would fund specific projects and not simply the General Fund. He commended staff for developing the Plans and the proposed rate increases to ensure the City was in compliance. In addition to addressing infrastructure and flooding, the projects also assist with protecting the environment. He referred to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and a beach closure in another community due to bacteria runoff following a storm, stressing the rate increase was not just about FTEs, it was to ensure the clean water this community cherishes. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE APPROXIMATELY $60,000 PER YEAR FROM LINE 6, CITYWIDE DRAINAGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS, IN YEARS 2011-2013 TO LINE 7, LAKE BALLINGER ASSOCIATED PROJECTS, SO THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT FOR LAKE BALLINGER ASSOCIATED PROJECTS INCREASED FROM $40,000 TO $100,000 IN EACH YEAR. SPECIFICALLY IT WOULD BE TO MOVE $60,000 IN 2011 AND 2012 AND $58,000 IN 2013. Councilmember Wilson explained in many cases the projects would be similar because they were drainage projects to the Puget Sound Watershed or the Lake Ballinger Watershed. Now, he could indicate to the Forum that Edmonds was dedicating $100,000/year to Lake Ballinger, a tremendous political impact. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1) COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. Councilmember Plunkett commented although unfunded mandates and potential litigation may be worthy of consideration, neither the City Attorney nor staff stated a 25% rate increase was required to avoid litigation and to comply with unfunded mandates. He was not convinced that a 25% increase was warranted to meet the goals and objectives referred to by Council President Pro Tem Peterson. Packet Page 13 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 11 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation for the Plan. She agreed with it in principle but would vote against it for the following reasons, 1) the Plan required additional FTEs and 2) she was opposed to adding staff when consideration was being given to increasing water rates and to a levy. Councilmember Wilson commented although staff had not explicitly stated the rate increase would avoid liability and implement the federal regulations, they had stated that indirectly. The City is required by federal law to provide this service and it cannot be provided without additional staff. He expressed his horror at the situation in the Gulf of Mexico, commenting that although many cite public safety as one the most important functions of a city, stormwater runoff is a similarly important issue. He commented on the impacts of stormwater on the quality of life, noting there are more urban streams between Seattle and Everett than any other place on the West Coast. An amount of oil equivalent to the Exxon Valdez oil spill enters the Puget Sound each year via stormwater runoff. He summarized the importance of supporting regulations that implement the Clean Water Act. Councilmember Buckshnis was encouraged that the proposed rate increase would fund two new jobs in the community. She requested further information regarding the education and outreach program, envisioning education via media, booklets, mailings, etc. She was satisfied with the rate increase, noting it was within the median income level and the two positions would be hired at the entry level. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim expressed his support for the Plan and increasing stormwater rates, recognizing these are new requirements that provide a greater degree of protection to Puget Sound. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-2-1), COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS AND PLUNKETT VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. 8. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2010 WATER SYSTEM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. City Engineer Rob English introduced Tom Lindberg, P.E., Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim provided staff’s recommendation to approve the 2010 Water System Comprehensive Plan Update. Mr. Lindberg explained MSA was tasked with the engineering and planning elements of the Plan. He introduced Nihat Dogan, Project Manager, FCS Group, who developed the financial information. Mr. Lindberg explained the purpose of the Water System Plan was: • Long-term guidance document with 6-year focus • Required by Department of Health every six years • Identify improvements for City’s CIP program • Evaluate water rates and charges • Last Water System Plan updated in 2002 He identified new regulatory requirements since 2002: • Drinking water regulations updated in 2004 and 2009 • Department of Health updated water system design guidelines in 2009 • 2003 Municipal Water Law • 2007 Water Use Efficiency Rule Mr. Lindberg identified and provided photographs of major water system facilities including: • Alderwood Supply Station • 1.5 million gallon (MG) below-grade Yost Reservoir Packet Page 14 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 12 • 1.5 MG below-grade Seaview Reservoir • 1.5 MG and 3.0 MG above-grade reservoir and pump station at Five Corners He provided an overview of the chapters and appendices in the Plan. Major work elements in the plan include: • Data collection • Water demand evaluation • Water system analyses • Water system improvements • Financial program He reviewed the current status of the plan: • All elements complete and reviewed by City staff • Presented to Planning Board on May 26th & June 9th • SEPA process completed on June 17th • Presented to City Council on June 22nd Mr. Lindberg reviewed accomplishments since 2002: • CIP Projects • Approximately 75% of 2002 Water Main Replacement Program is either completed or designed. This includes replacement of 30,900 linear feet of old water main and design for replacement of an additional 9,500 linear feet is 90% complete and approaching construction • Completed 6 water system facility improvement projects • Water Conservation • Approximately 1% per year reduction in consumption He reviewed current water system sustainability elements: • Ongoing leak detection program • Ongoing water main replacement program • Bills showing consumption history • Evaluation of reclaimed water opportunities • Involvement as member of Everett Water Utility Committee • Indoor and outdoor conservation kits • Audits of school irrigation systems and commercial users • Public outreach and school-based education programs • Rebates for water efficient toilets and clothes washers Water use efficiency and sustainability accomplishments since the last Plan was completed include: • Overall supply declined from 3.65 million gallons/day (MGD) in 2003 to 3.07 MGD in 2008 • Per capita water usage declined from 111 gallons/day (1995-2000 average) to 104 gallons/day (2003-2008 average) • Current goal to reduce annual per capita water usage by 1% per year • Water system leakage complies with Dept. of Health regulations • Less than 10% leakage based on 3-yr rolling average He provided distribution system leakage trends for 2001 to 2010 that illustrate decreasing leakage. He also provided per capita water usage trends for 2001 to 2010 that illustrate a decreasing usage trend. He explained their existing system evaluation evaluated the Alderwood Supply Station, the Five Corners Packet Page 15 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 13 Pump Station, the Five Corners, Seaview and Yost reservoirs, and the distribution system (water mains). Their evaluation determined: • Supply capacity is sufficient with improvements underway • Storage capacity is sufficient • Pump station capacity is sufficient • Old water mains are reaching end of useful service life • Many water mains are undersized to provide sufficient fire flow • Some water mains are leaking and main breaks are occurring Mr. Lindberg described existing system conditions, displaying 2002 photographs illustrating corrosion and build-up in a 1928 8-inch cast iron water main and a 1928 12-inch cast iron water main. He also displayed a 2009 photograph of a 1929 8-inch cast iron water main that broke in December 2009. Their evaluation determined the following water system needs: • 2010-2016 CIP totals $20.1 million, averaging $2.87 million per year • Water main replacements account for 87% of 20-year CIP • Approximately 1% of all water mains replaced each year per the CIP schedule • Additional staff for GIS support at 1/3 FTE for Water Utility He explained the objectives of the financial evaluation conducted by FCS Group were to • Identify total cost of providing water service, operations and maintenance costs as well as capital improvement costs • Identify financial program for the next 6 years Major tasks in the financial evaluation included: • Reviewing existing financial condition of water utility • Summarizing financial policies • Identifying capital funding resources • Developing a capital funding plan with projected rate adjustments • Developing a financial forecast • Reviewing affordability of rates The financial evaluation determined: • Annual rate increases of 7.5% over the next 3 years are necessary to fund the operations and maintenance program and planned capital improvements. • Rates will be reviewed again in 2012 Mr. Lindberg noted in the June 22 presentation the recommended annual increase was 8.5%. Recent data from Alderwood Water indicates lower wholesale costs over the next few years resulting in a lower rate increase. Key factors for the rate increase include: • Ongoing need to replace aging and leaky water mains; many are undersized to meet current fire flow requirements • Alderwood Water District’s anticipated wholesale rate increases • Decreasing water revenues per capita from gradual water usage reductions due to successful conservation activities • Lack of low interest loan and grant programs from the State for funding water system improvements Packet Page 16 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 14 Mr. Lindberg provided a comparison of Edmonds water rate increases to purchased water cost increases and inflation increases during 1993 to 2009 and projected increases through 2012. The comparison indicates Edmonds rates were raised 5 times during the last 17 years and that during 1993-2009, the average annual increase was approximately 2.3% compared to inflationary increases of 2.5% and Alderwood’s water cost increases of approximately 3.5%. Mr. Lindberg provided a comparison of Edmonds existing and proposed rate with other utility districts’ single family monthly water rates that range from a high of Seattle’s summer rate of $45.33 to a low of Lynnwood’s rate of $14.97. Edmonds current rate is $22.05/month; the proposed rate if $23.71/month, an increase of $1.66/month. He reviewed next steps: • Submit plan to Department of Health and adjacent water purveyors – July 2010 • Department of Health review complete approximately October 2010 • Adoption by City Council anticipated approximately November 2010 Mr. Lindberg highlighted questions raised by the Planning Board with regard to low fire flows shown in the Water System Plan and the schedule for individual water main projects. Councilmember Petso explained she raised concerns at the Planning Board regarding fire flows. She recalled at the last meeting staff indicated they had reviewed the fire flow numbers and worked with Fire District 1 to identify problems in the system and determined while fire flow may be low at a particular hydrant, there was sufficient flow at nearby hydrants. She asked whether there were areas where fire flows were below desired targets and/or the State required standards. Mr. Lindberg answered a fire flow analysis was conducted for the entire system. All areas identified with low fire flow will be improved via projects on the CIP. Before those improvements are made, the areas surrounding a specific hydrant with deficient flow have higher fire flow than the one hydrant with low fire flow. Councilmember Petso asked whether a statement to that effect could be included in the Plan, that the issue had been researched and that adequate flow to all sites could be assured. Mr. Lindberg answered that could be done. Councilmember Petso asked whether there was adequate fire flow at Stevens Hospital. Mr. Lindberg answered the majority of the mains in that area are 8-inch which do not have sufficient fire flow to meet the highest fire flow requirement in the system. Councilmember Petso asked whether it met legal minimums. Mr. Lindberg answered it does not meet the fire flow of 5,000 GPM. Councilmember Petso asked if that was a policy target fire flow or the State minimum. Mr. Lindberg agreed that was a planning level fire flow. Mr. Miller explained conversations with Fire District 1 indicate they are satisfied there is sufficient fire flow under normal circumstances. Fire District 1 also pointed out the Stevens Hospital buildings are constructed to be fire resistant and have fire sprinklers. He summarized the Fire Marshal indicated the fire flow should be addressed via water main improvements in the future as shown in the Plan but it was not an immediate concern. Councilmember Petso asked if the City would continue to follow the scoring matrix to establish priorities or would certain safety projects such as the mains near Stevens Hospital or projects where a road would be dug up for another project be considered in establishing priorities. Mr. Miller answered those factors would be taken into consideration regardless of a project’s priority in the scoring matrix. Councilmember Petso suggested the language on page 913 of the Plan that the scoring matrix would be used to determine priorities be deleted and that staff be allowed discretion to adjust individual project priorities based on other relevant circumstances. Mr. Miller agreed that could be done. Packet Page 17 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 15 City Attorney Scott Snyder referred to the memo he provided the Council in response to the issues Councilmember Petso raised at the Planning Board, explaining if the Council wished to change priorities based on fire flow, it would be a General Fund cost, not a water rate cost. He suggested fire flow improvements be funded via the water utility tax collected in the General Fund rather than water rates. Councilmember Petso anticipated there would be situations where the water main was also leaking and may justify the improvement. She did not anticipate it would be the Council’s responsibility to tell staff whether an improvement was for fire flow, leak or for another reason. Councilmember Petso referred to financial policies in the Plan, specifically the statement that the Plan would did not include a Capital Contingency Reserve. She asked if that was typical or if there was another source of funding to address a facility failure. Mr. Miller explained most of the capital improvements were main replacements, a proactive approach to replace 1% of the mains each year for the foreseeable future. Staff has the discretion to scale back main replacement projects in the event of a capital failure. Based on the condition of facilities, the likelihood of failure is small. Failures in the distribution system are more likely which are addressed via the water main replacement program. Because the water utility is a part combined utility fund, there are reserves for the general combined utility rather than each separate utility. With regard to system replacement, Councilmember Petso commented typically a utility would set aside funds to address replacement; however the Plan states no system reinvestment funding is included per staff’s direction to reduce immediate rate impacts. She asked if it was typical to set aside funds for replacement and if so, why the City did not. Nihat Dogan, Project Manager, FCS Group, explained typically a system replacement funding policy recognizes the need for rates to generate more money to fund depreciation expenses and put those funds aside for future replacement. In Edmonds the capital improvement program already includes asset replacement projects and the existing capital funding strategy finances those replacements. If the Plan included a system replacement policy, rates would be much higher. Instead of setting aside funds, the replacement projects are included in the capital improvement program and the impact is spread over a longer period of time. Councilmember Wilson suggested continuing the public hearing and offered to work with Councilmember Petso and staff on changes to the Plan to address her concerns. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled financing of hydrants was removed from the water utility and now are financed separately. He questioned how the money in the water utility that was previously spent on hydrants was being used. He pointed out there was no federal mandate for the proposed Plan. He agreed with the suggestion to continue the public hearing to allow additional research. Next, he expressed concern with the City’s expenditure of $800,000 on water system improvements as a result of the double tracking and suggested the City pursue funding from BNSF. He also objected to the 18% water utility tax as well as the proposed rate increases. He referred to comments he provided to the Council on May 18 that building permits are down 58% and plan check fees are down 42%, yet the number of City employees has not been reduced. He summarized the proposed rate increases were excessive and the Council should investigate the minimum rate increase necessary. Todd Cloutier, Edmonds, pointed out the capital investment plan in the 2003 Water Plan was not executed for a variety of reasons including emergencies and understaffing. The Planning Board’s recommendation includes requiring periodic reports on the status of the Water Plan. With regard to the connection between the Stormwater, Water and Transportation Plans, he recommended the Council direct staff to identify places where the plans overlap to allow projects to be done simultaneously. Packet Page 18 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 16 Chris Fleck, Edmonds, commented on the reference to a rate adjustment rather than a rate increase, emphasizing this was a proposed rate increase. He expressed concern that one of the reasons for the rate increase was lower usage due to water conservation. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, recommended the City identify funds for replacement projects. He pointed out water rates could impact citizens’ water consumption. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. In response to Mr. Hertrich’s comment regarding funding for fire hydrants, Finance Director Lorenzo Hines explained as a result of Lane v. City of Seattle, Edmonds’ water utility tax was increased from 10% to 18.7% to address that new requirement. Utility taxes are collected and deposited in the General Fund and once a year an amount is transferred to the Combined Utility Fund. For example, a November 2009 a budget amendment transferred $340,000. Mr. Snyder suggested City Clerk Sandy Chase provide the minutes from the meeting when the water utility tax was increased. With regard to the suggestion to continue the public hearing, Mr. Snyder explained the Water Comprehensive Plan would be presented to the Council for a public hearing again in November along with other Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Council would have the ability to make changes at that time as well as hold additional public hearings. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO AUGUST 3, 2010. Mr. Miller suggested next week’s Community Services/Development Services Committee address the issues raised by Councilmember Petso and any other concerns. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim requested Councilmembers forward any additional concerns to staff as soon as possible. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim declared a brief recess. 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON WATER AND STORMWATER FINANCIAL RATE INCREASES AS RECOMMENDED IN THE 2010 WATER AND STORM AND SURFACE WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLANS. Public Works Director Noel Miller explained in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan Updates for the City's Water System and Storm and Surface Water Systems, sufficient revenues must be available in order to implement the plans. Based on a financial analysis performed as part of the City's Comprehensive Water & Storm Water Plan Updates, FCS Group and City Staff have determined that utility rate increases are necessary. He displayed a 2010 – 2012 proposed monthly utility rates (water, sewer and stormwater) for the average residential customer. He described the proposal to increase water rates 7.5% later this year, 7.5% in January 2011 and 7.5% in January 2012. He advised no increase was proposed in sewer rates; the current rate was adequate to support operations and capital programs. Mr. Miller described the proposal to increase stormwater rates 8.0% later this year, 8% in January 2011, and 8.1% in January 2012. The overall impact on a monthly residential customer was a 4.5% annual rate increase or per year as follows: Packet Page 19 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 17 Year Water Rate Inc. Stormwater Rate Inc. Total Inc. 2010 $1.97 $0.73 $2.70 2011 $2.13 $0.79 $2.92 2012 $2.28 $0.86 $3.14 Total $6.38 $2.38 $8.76 Mr. Miller explained the federal Environmental Protection Agency developed an affordability index for utilities. The rate consultant compared Edmonds’ proposed rate to the affordability index and determined a 2.5% increase was reasonable for these essential utilities. The overall effect of the rate increase to 2012 is approximately 1.2% or approximately half the amount the EPA determined an average citizen could afford. Mr. Miller explained the proposed rate increases address the specific needs of the City's water and storm water utilities and in meeting increasingly stringent State and Federal regulations. In comparison with other jurisdictions in the area, the proposed rates are affordable to the average citizen. He summarized although the increases were substantial, they were necessary to continue to provide a reliable domestic water supply as well as fire protection. Further, if the City does not continue water main replacement, the reliability of the system decreases. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim asked the effect on this agenda item of the Council’s action to continue the public hearing regarding the Water Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Miller responded the Council could continue the hearing on the water and stormwater rate increases or in light of the Council’s approval of the Storm and Surface Water Management Plan, approve the stormwater rate increase. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented the reason the sewer rate was not proposed to be increased was that fund was increased substantially in the past. He suggested the approximately 22% increase in water rates and 25% increase in stormwater rates was excessive regardless of the fact that the City had a combined utility. He feared if the Council approved the water and stormwater rate increases, voters would not approve an increase in the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) vehicle license fee or a levy. He reiterated his question regarding how the money that was previously used to fund fire hydrants was being used now. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, suggested the City offset the increase in utility rates with a B&O tax. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. He relayed staff’s recommendation to increase the water rates annually by 7.5% and the stormwater rates annually by 8.0% to adequately finance the proposed water and storm and surface water comprehensive plans for years 2010, 2011, and 2012. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why an increase in the sewer rates was not being proposed. Mr. Miller explained the sewer rates generated enough revenue to cover operating and capital costs. The treatment plant was a major expenditure and caused sewer rates to increase 20 years ago. The bonds were paid off in 2008 and the revenue previously used for debt service is now available in the sewer utility for other projects such as updating the City’s 15 pump stations. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO INCREASE THE WATER RATES ANNUALLY BY 7.5% AND THE STORMWATER RATES ANNUALLY BY 8.0% TO ADEQUATELY FINANCE THE PROPOSED Packet Page 20 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 18 WATER AND STORM AND SURFACE WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLANS FOR YEARS 2010, 2011, AND 2012 AND DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL. Council President Pro Tem Peterson acknowledged concerns with the proposed increases; however, he balanced it with the amount of work citizens get for the money, the importance of the work, and continuing to provide clean drinking water. He commented friends visiting from New Mexico were amazed when he told them they could drink the tap water in Edmonds. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim commented since Edmonds was primarily a residential community, residents have to pay for the services they receive. He viewed the modest cost of utilities as the price to live in this outstanding community. Councilmember Wilson acknowledged tax increases were not fun but Edmonds staff did more with fewer dollars than another city and had far fewer employees per capita for the services the City provides. Edmonds also has the lowest residential property tax rate of any similarly sized city in the area and the City’s utility rates are well below the average. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim asked whether the Council wanted to continue this public hearing or take action separately on the water and stormwater rate increases. Council President Pro Tem Peterson suggested the Council could approve the rate increase as he did not envision substantial changes would be made to the capital improvements in the Water Plan. It was also appropriate to approve the rate increases at this time in view of the upcoming transition in Public Works. Councilmember Wilson agreed it was unlikely there would be substantive changes made to the Water Plan. Mr. Snyder clarified the recommended action was to direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance. The ordinance could be scheduled on a future Council agenda. MOTION CARRIED (5-1-1), COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR ONE HOUR. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION AND CRITERIA FOR WALL GRAPHICS/MURALS. Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin explained in the current code murals on exterior walls are a type of non-commercial wall graphic. The purpose of the proposed amendments is to clarify the definition, review process and review criteria. Staff reviewed other cities’ regulations with regard to murals and worked with the City Attorney to draft proposed amendments to the existing sign code. The proposed amendments were presented to the Community Services/Development Services Committee and the Committee forwarded the item to the Planning Board. The Planning Board held a public hearing, recommended minor revisions and forwarded the proposed amendments to Council. The document in the Council packet reflects the changes recommended by the Planning Board. The Council reviewed the proposed amendments on June 15. Ms. Chapin referred to a typographical error on page 6 of the document, the word “renewable” should be “reviewable.” Packet Page 21 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 19 Ms. Chapin explained staff’s research found that cities regulate murals in three ways: 1. Establish a theme and specific criteria to which all murals must conform. 2. Establish a special city-run mural program that regulates murals. Operating such a program requires staff time and money. 3. Treat murals as a type of sign for which a permit and fee are required as part of the sign code as a non-commercial graphic. Edmonds had used the third approach in the past; a mural is considered a wall graphic in the sign code. Murals are a privately created graphic or artwork placed on a privately owned building or wall. Sign codes often include administrative standards and criteria for review which help clarify what the applicant needs to provide and to encourage an outcome that fits the community. Wall graphics/murals cannot be reviewed under the sign code based on content or aesthetic. A mural on a public building is considered public art which follows the public art review process. Staff proposes changes to the existing sign code to clarify how murals and wall graphics are handled within the City’s sign code. The goal in establishing criteria is to ensure murals, 1) meet standards for materials and maintenance, 2) generally fit the surroundings and 3) clarify for the applicant what information is needed for review. Ms. Chapin reviewed the proposed changes as follows: • Definitions – the word “murals” was included in the definition of wall graphic and that they primarily do not contain words. • Design Review Procedures –language in this section was changed to clarify wall graphic applications will be reviewed by the Planning Manager or designee. A subsection was added with review criteria. • Staff Review of Murals and Artwork – although a separate sign permit is required for each wall graphic, staff may make one design review decision on wall graphics that consists of a related group of murals. Applicants are encouraged to coordinate artwork with the design/architectural elements of a building and the historic and pedestrian orientation of the downtown area. • Submission requirements – specific submission requirements were added • Review Criteria – a section was added identifying review criteria for design review related to quality of materials, durability and permanence, compatibility of the artwork with architectural elements or other street elements, minimizing lettering, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why a theme concept was not selected rather than just encouraging murals to be compatible with architectural elements. Ms. Chapin answered that would be a decision of the Council. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the permitting process would be less expensive for a theme-based mural program. Planning Manager Rob Chave answered whether a mural was theme based was irrelevant to the cost. For example if a theme required the involvement of the Arts Commission, a different process would be required and potentially additional applicant requirements. Councilmember Buckshnis envisioned a theme such as “History of Edmonds” would require establishing parameters, thereby streamlining the mural review process and making the process less costly. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained the difference would likely be upfront costs to design criteria that were sufficiently enforceable. He summarized there may be less cost on a per application basis but more costs up front to develop criteria. Councilmember Buckshnis commented Port Townsend, Port Angeles and Kalaloch all have themes. Mr. Snyder responded if the Council wanted to pursue a theme approach, that direction needed to be conveyed to staff. Packet Page 22 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 20 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented a close family member was an artist and she envisioned a theme would reduce opportunity for artistic creativity. She preferred to allow artists to design/create murals that were specific to an area or building. Ms. Chapin explained the existing sign code regulates murals. Staff proposed these amendments to clarify the process for applicants and staff. The amendments also provide slightly more flexibility for the applicant. If the Council wants to pursue a different approach, direction needs to be provided to staff. Councilmember Wilson inquired whether the definition of a mural was a painting on a wall or something applied to a wall. Ms. Chapin responded under the current code, a mural was a graphic applied to a wall that is less than ½ inch thick. It could be painted on the wall or applied via other methods. Councilmember Wilson pointed out the definition of wall sign includes signs painted directly on a wall, however, the regulations regarding murals do not apply to wall signs. Ms. Chapin clarified a mural was currently defined in the sign code as a non-commercial wall graphic. Councilmember Wilson commented there were different definitions for a painting on a wall versus painting on a surface, a wall graphic versus a wall sign. Mr. Chave clarified either would be a wall graphic; a wall graphic does not specify whether it is painted directly on the wall or on a material that is attached to the wall. Mr. Snyder referred to the definition of signs that states graphic symbols or written copy for the purposes of conveying a particular message. A mural may include graphics but is a broader category. Councilmember Wilson referred to the definition of wall sign page 6 that states wall signs include signs that are painted directly upon a wall. He suggested this line be deleted. Mr. Snyder explained the difference was the amount of signage a business was allowed under the code. A mural would be in addition to any allowed wall signage. Mr. Chave explained the mural allowance was much broader than wall sign. A wall sign had strict limitations with regard to dimensions, height above the ground, etc. Councilmember Wilson expressed concern that it appeared there were two design review procedures, the Planning Manager and the Architectural Design Board (ADB). Mr. Chave answered most signage is reviewed under the administrative process in conjunction with a building permit. Signs are not typically reviewed by the ADB unless flexibility is sought in the signage regulations such as an unusual location or building configuration. The ADB also reviews sign packages for larger complexes such as a series of signs. Councilmember Wilson referred to page 8 and reference to review by the ADB due to the requirement to obtain a certificate of appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) for murals on designated historic structures or with a designated historic district. He asked whether all murals downtown would be required to be reviewed by the HPC because downtown was a historic district. Mr. Chave answered the HPC has broad authority over historic sites and it may not be appropriate to apply a mural to a historic structure. Councilmember Wilson found it odd that the regulations would require the artistic content to be consistent with the historic nature of the district and the HPC given authority to review art but not provide a role for the Art Commission. Mr. Chave responded it was the Council’s discretion whether to require an arts process or treat murals like signage. Councilmember Plunkett referred to the clause highlighted by Councilmember Wilson regarding obtaining a certificate of appropriateness, noting that would only be applicable to the 15 buildings that were officially recognized on the local or State historic registry. Mr. Chave agreed. Councilmember Plunkett pointed out no historic districts had yet been established in Edmonds. Councilmember Wilson disagreed, pointing out the ordinance states a certificate of appropriateness shall be obtained from the HPC for murals on historic designated structures or within a designated historic Packet Page 23 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 21 district and does not define a designated historic district. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the reference to a historic district was an established historic district. Mr. Snyder pointed out there was a process for designating buildings and districts although no districts had yet been designated. He suggested deleting the clause regarding historic districts or capitalizing Historic District. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER TO THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. Councilmember Petso pointed out this was not a public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Jeff Stillwell, Edmonds, Edmonds Mural Society (EMS), explained the Society is a non-profit organization whose mission is to celebrate the beauty, history and people of Edmonds by raising murals throughout the City. The EMS has strong support in the community since its inception last September as evidenced by 200 dues-paying members. He identified several members of the EMS in the audience. He explained raising murals was one of the most technically complex art forms. If a mural is to be of masterful design and lasting duration, careful research and thorough and careful preparation must be undertaken. The EMS takes raising a mural very seriously. He recognized Ms. Chapin for overseeing the effort to craft regulations for a mural. He relayed the EMS’ support for the proposed amendments. He thanked Mr. Chave and the Planning Department for their thorough, willing and careful support during the permitting process. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim inquired about the proposed waiver of fees. Mr. Stillwell suggested at this time the Council only consider the municipal code change. Manya Schilperoost, Development Director, Edmonds Mural Society, read a letter from the artist who created the first mural last September, Pat Brier. Ms. Brier described her honor at being chosen the first mural artist for the EMS’ new mural program. She has been working as an artist since 1984, published in national anthologies, exhibiting in Edmonds since 2000 and an Edmonds resident since 1996. She described her efforts to develop a mural using the theme the EMS provided and the support provided by residents and visitors. She described residents’ excitement of the concept of an outdoor fine art gallery with themes selected by the EMS membership and interpreted by artists in individual visual concepts. She relayed reports by other mural cities that artistic installations by their mural societies have substantially improved their economies. Al Rutledge, Edmonds, reported there was little public participation at the Planning Board public hearing regarding the proposed amendment to the sign code. He recommended audience comments be scheduled earlier on the agenda. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3800, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 20.60 RELATING TO SIGNS TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS FOR WALL GRAPHIC MURALS AND ARTWORK. Packet Page 24 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 22 COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON, TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE BY CAPITALIZING HISTORIC DISTRICT ON PAGE 8, PARAGRAPH 2E. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim suggested referencing the definition of Historic District. Mr. Snyder advised that could be done during the codification process. AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-0-1). COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. Councilmember Plunkett explained he supported the proposed amendments as it was the least intrusive of the three alternatives. He preferred to have the least impact on the content, art and free spirit of murals. Council President Pro Tem Peterson expressed his support for the proposed amendments. He thanked staff and the EMS volunteers, noting he was a dues-paying member of the EMS. He viewed the proposed amendments as a great step toward Edmonds being recognized as an arts community. Councilmember Buckshnis echoed Council President Pro Tem Peterson’s comments. Councilmember Wilson commented although the proposed amendments were better than the existing code, it was not ideal for reasons he mentioned previously. He supported the ordinance but anticipated the City would be open to significant political challenges. He referred to the City of Snohomish where art such as murals were regulated by the sign code and the public outcry and political turmoil over a mural depicting naked pigs. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. 10. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Al Rutledge, Edmonds, announced a Christmas in July event; Edmonds Lutheran Church will be collecting toys at Top Foods July 8 – 27. David Dobradt, Seattle, LaRouche Political Action Committee, urged the Council to pass a resolution to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act. He recalled encouraging the Council a few years ago to pass a resolution in support of the Homeowner Bank Protection Act resolution. At that time Mr. LaRouche warned if action was not taken to protect homeowners and banks, they would be destroyed by the financial collapse. That policy was not taken up by Congress and the result has been numerous bailouts and cities and states have been forced to make budget cuts or raise taxes. The Glass Steagall Act represents a form of protection from financial collapse, setting up a firewall between the bankrupt financial system, the population and the commercial banking system. He summarized economic recovery was possible if action was taken to assert the preamble of the constitution to protect the population from the bankrupt financial system. Anastasia Mares, Seattle, LaRouche Political Action Committee, commented many cities and states are in financial crisis and tent cities are springing up everywhere. If leadership is not asserted via the Glass-Steagall policy, the United States will cease to exist. She commented on the discouraging situation for young people who graduate from college and are unable to find a job. If the Council does not pass the Glass-Steagall resolution as a body, she encouraged individual Councilmembers to support it. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, described a car fire that occurred across the street from Old Mill Town on a Tuesday evening at approximately 10:00 p.m. Bystanders called 911 and the police responded and blocked off the street. Personnel at the downtown fire station were unavailable and fire station #16 on Packet Page 25 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 23 196th responded to the call. He expressed concern with the 11 minute response time from the time the police arrived and requested the Council investigate. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 11:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 11. APPOINTMENT TO AND DIRECTIONS FOR THE 2010 CITIZENS LEVY COMMITTEE Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim advised ten citizens applied for the seven positions on the Citizens Levy Committee. The intent was for each Councilmember to appoint one member to the committee. Councilmember Plunkett objected to appointing only seven members and suggested appointing all ten applicants. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPOINT ALL TEN APPLICANTS TO THE LEVY COMMITTEE. Councilmember Wilson explained the committee was advertised as each Councilmember appointing one member. Some citizens did not apply because they did not think they would be selected by a Councilmember. If the desire was to include everyone who applied, he recommended the committee be re-advertised. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested appointing seven members and three alternates who would attend meetings and vote if one of the committee members were absent. Councilmember Plunkett accepted her suggestion as a friendly amendment. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim restated the motion as follows: APPOINT SEVEN MEMBERS AND THREE ALTERNATES WHO WOULD ATTEND MEETINGS AND VOTE IF ONE OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS WERE ABSENT Councilmember Wilson explained there was nothing wrong with allowing everyone who applied to serve on the committee but it should be re-advertised if that was the intent. He noted the first meeting was not until July 21 which would allow time to re-advertise. He indicated he would not support the motion for other reasons. Council President Pro Tem Peterson recalled the intent was for each Councilmember to appoint one member and the Mayor appoint one member. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas appreciated the intent of inclusiveness but the point was to have a small group. She feared if the committee were re-advertised, the result could be another committee of 20-30 people. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim did not support the motion, preferring to abide by the announcement that was made. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-4-1), COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS AND PLUNKETT VOTING YES; MAYOR PRO TEM BERNHEIM, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO, AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. Packet Page 26 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 24 COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO APPOINT EIGHT OF THE TEN MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE CITIZEN LEVY COMMITTEE. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas clarified her motion was each councilmember would appoint one member and the mayor would appoint one member. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim clarified all eight would be voting members. He suggested delaying the appointment to be made by the mayor until the new mayor was selected. Councilmember Petso requested additional time to make her selection as she had not seen the list of applicants. Councilmembers made their selections as follows: Councilmember Fraley-Monillas – John Reed Councilmember Plunkett – John Carlin Council President Pro Tem Peterson –Bill Vance Councilmember Wilson – Evelyn Wellington Councilmember Buckshnis – Darrol Haug Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim – Harry Gatjens COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADOPT THE DIRECTION TO THE LEVY COMMITTEE AS STATED IN THE AGENDA MEMO. Council President Pro Tem Peterson commented although he was originally opposed to the formation of the committee, now that the committee had been established he would support the direction provided to the committee. Councilmember Wilson questioned the committee’s ability to complete its work by December in order to place a levy on the February ballot, the goal stated by the Finance Committee. He pointed out the list of tasks was extensive, for example item 2 under Additional Direction states the levy committee shall review and report on Edmonds’ financials to determine compliance to Ordinance 3789 and Resolution 1266. He noted that task alone could take until December. He did not support the motion. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City was in compliance with Ordinance 3789 and Resolution 1266 except for the General Fund. She agreed the tasks looked extensive but believed they were achievable given the way she has structured the process. MOTION CARRIED (5-1-1), COUNCILMEMBER WILSON VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. 12. REQUEST FOR DEFENSE UNDER EDMONDS CITY CODE CHAPTER 2.06. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim relayed staff’s recommendation that the City Council authorize the City Attorney to represent two former city employees and two current employees in responding to a complaint to the state Board of Engineers. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT TWO FORMER CITY EMPLOYEES AND TWO CURRENT EMPLOYEES IN Packet Page 27 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 25 RESPONDING TO A COMPLAINT TO THE STATE BOARD OF ENGINEERS. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. 12A. REMOVAL OF TREE AT 3RD AND WALNUT. Councilmember Wilson displayed a photograph of a large tree on the corner of 3rd & Walnut that was planted 50 years ago by the family that lives in the house and currently operates the daycare. He explained behind the tree is a condominium project that was foreclosed on. When the ownership of condominium property changed, construction on the project continued. He provided a photograph illustrating that base of the tree is integrated into the fence line and the property owner experiences the tree as part of their property. Most of the tree is actually on City easement and a portion is on the citizen’s property. Last Thursday, after hearing a chainsaw, the owner of the daycare inquired of the chainsaw operator and was told it was none of her business because the tree was on City property. She informed them the tree was on her property. She contacted the City and the City responded they would investigate. On the previous day, Wednesday, the developer visited Development Services and inquired about removing the tree. Staff informed the developer they would investigate and get back to them. On Thursday morning, the developer removed the tree. It is also believed the developer as early as Monday began cutting the tree roots to order to destroy the tree. Councilmember Wilson displayed a photograph with the tree and the daycare’s fence removed and a photograph of replacement of the fence with a similar fence. The owner of the condominium project, Charles Ainsley, introduced himself to the property owner by saying he had just sold Golf Bank for $18 million and asked how much cash she wanted to allow him to remove three additional trees. She told him she did not care about the money and cared more about the tree he removed that was planted by her family 50 years ago. Councilmember Wilson summarized the developer cut down a tree on City property, no different than cutting a tree in Yost Park, and the penalty was only $500. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO INSTRUCT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO FILE A COMPLAINT SO THAT THE EDMONDS POLICE CAN BEGIN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR PRO TEM TO INITIATE ANY LEGAL ACTION AS NEEDED IN THE NEXT SEVEN DAYS. Council President Pro Tem Peterson stressed when City staff was asked about the tree, they told the developer not to do anything until they researched the matter further. The developer then ignored staff’s direction and removed the tree. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETSO ABSTAINED. 13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim had no report. 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported while working in Boston during the past week, she stayed at the Omni Park Hotel, the longest continually operating hotel in the United States. She noted that the Wolfgang Puck coffee they provided in guest rooms is manufactured in Edmonds. Councilmember Plunkett provided an update regarding the fiber optics business plan. Instead of creating a business plan that will fit everyone and be approved by the City Council, the Citizens Technology Packet Page 28 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 26 Advisory Committee (CTAC), staff and the Economic Development Committee subcommittee have endorsed pursuing targets of opportunity. He explained a number of entities have approached the City about connecting to the City’s fiber but they have been put off awaiting the business plan. The intent now is when a target of opportunity arises, the appropriate staff will conduct a cost/benefit analysis and a mini business plan developed to ensure the target will net the City money and then move forward with connecting them to the City’s fiber. Over the next 6-12 months, targets of opportunity will be identified from whom the City can learn and gain experience. With that experience, a more extensive analysis will be conducted and a business plan developed. Councilmember Plunkett commented although much of this is an administrative function, there may be additional investment that will require Council consideration. Future CTAC agendas will include discussion regarding potential expenditures associated with targets of opportunity. He summarized a complete business plan will not be presented to the Council; the CTAC will present a full report to the Council on August 24. Council President Pro Tem Peterson welcomed Councilmember Petso to the Council and stated he looked forward to working with her. He congratulated and thanked the Chamber of Commerce for another fantastic 4th of July celebration. He also thanked all the volunteers who assisted with that event. Council President Pro Tem Peterson expressed his thanks to retiring Public Works Director Noel Miller for his many years of service to the City. Councilmember Wilson welcomed Councilmember Petso. He regretted missing the Council candidate interviews last week and the Mayor’s going away party. Councilmember Wilson pointed out the schedule for next Tuesday includes a Transportation Benefit District meeting at 4:00 p.m., followed by committee meetings, followed by mayoral interviews. He suggested cancelling committee meetings and scheduling the TBD meeting at 7:00 p.m. with interviews following or schedule the TBD meeting following the interviews or reschedule the TBD meeting to July 20. He suggested the mayoral candidate interviews be 20-25 minutes each. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim responded the amount of time for the interviews will depend on the number of applicants. Councilmember Buckshnis reported she was unable to attend Mayor Haakenson’s going away party although she was able to see some of it on YouTube. She thanked Council President Pro Tem Peterson for donating cheese for the event. Councilmember Buckshnis congratulated Councilmember Petso and announced this was Councilmember Plunkett’s last meeting as a single man. Councilmember Petso commented one of the special privileges about being on the Council again was being in the loop of volunteer activities in the City. She commented tonight’s meeting referenced the volunteers who worked on the 4th of July parade, the Taste of Edmonds, Edmonds Mural Society and Christmas in July. She recalled during the Council candidate interviews there was discussion regarding leveraging Edmonds assets; these volunteers are one of the City’s assets. In response to Councilmember Wilson’s suggestion regarding the schedule for next Tuesday, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the priority should be the mayoral interviews. She suggested allowing 30 minutes for each interview due to the importance of the position. She suggested postponing the TBD meeting and/or committee meetings. Packet Page 29 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 6, 2010 Page 27 Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim requested Councilmembers provide him their preference with regard to next Tuesday’s schedule within the next 36 hours. 15. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 11:29 p.m. Packet Page 30 of 208 AM-3214 2.C. Approve 07-13-10 City Council Minutes Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of July 13, 2010. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 07-13-10 Draft City Council Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 09:38 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 11:00 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 07/15/2010 09:27 AM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 31 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 13, 2010 Page 1 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES JULY 13, 2010 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:11 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim in the Council Chambers located in the Public Safety Complex, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Steve Bernheim, Mayor Pro Tem Strom Peterson, Council President Pro Tem Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember DJ Wilson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Michael Plunkett, Councilmember Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim requested a motion for approval of the agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCHSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. INTERVIEW APPLICANTS FOR THE POSITION OF MAYOR. Mayor Pro Tem Bernheim described the procedure for the interviews as follows: 30 minutes is available for each person being interviewed; the first 10 minutes is to be used by the person being interviewed to make a statement, and the remaining 20 minutes will be available to Councilmembers for questions. If there is available time at the end of the questions, the person being interviewed will have the balance of time to comment until the 30 minutes runs out. The following individuals were interviewed: Richard Marin Todd Clayton Ronald Wambolt Mike Cooper Michael Pederson Dick Van Hollebeke Roger Hertrich Frank Yamamoto Packet Page 32 of 208 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes July 13, 2010 Page 2 City Council Comments Councilmember Wilson commented that he believes the Council deserves credit for the process that has taken place this evening. He is not aware of any other city that interviews every applicant that applies for a position. Typically, the list of applicants is narrowed down to a few to interview. For comparison, he described the process that recently took place in Marysville, where their Mayor resigned, and the same night a new Mayor was appointed and took over the meeting. He noted that the Edmonds City Council’s procedure of interviewing all applicants was a credit to the community, citizens and this Council. Council President Pro Tem Peterson thanked everyone for applying, and also thanked audience members for attending. He further announced the Edmonds in Bloom garden tour will be held this weekend. Councilmember Buckshnis announced the concerts in the park that are held on Sundays at 3:00 p.m. at City Park. The meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m. Packet Page 33 of 208 AM-3217 2.D. Approval of Claim Checks Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Debbie Karber Submitted For:Lorenzo Hines Time:Consent Department:Finance Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #119892 through #120038 dated July 8, 2010 for $366,414.62, and checks #120039 through #120178 dated July 15, 2010 for $499,864.00. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approval of claim checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2010 Revenue: Expenditure:$866,278.62 Fiscal Impact: Claims: $866,278.62 Attachments Link: Claim cks 7-8-10 Link: Claim cks 7-15-10 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 01:49 PM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 04:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 04:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Debbie Karber Started On: 07/15/2010 12:36 PM Packet Page 34 of 208 Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 35 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119892 7/8/2010 072627 911 ETC INC 170574 JUNE 2010 911 DATABASE MAINT Jun-10 911 database maint 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 101.50 Total :101.50 119893 7/8/2010 065568 ALLWATER INC 070110034 COEWASTE DRINKING WATER 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 26.80 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.11 2.55 Total :29.35 119894 7/8/2010 001528 AM TEST INC 60083 OIL & GREASE ANALYSIS OIL & GREASE ANALYSIS 411.000.656.538.800.410.31 250.00 Total :250.00 119895 7/8/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4992034 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 32.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.04 Total :35.04 119896 7/8/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4984538 STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC Street Storm Uniform Svc 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 2.19 Street Storm Uniform Svc 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 2.19 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.21 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.21 FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-4984540 Fleet Uniform Svc 1Page: Packet Page 36 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119896 7/8/2010 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 29.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.240.00 2.76 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-4992035 Fac Maint Uniform Svc 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 32.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.240.00 3.06 Total :71.79 119897 7/8/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-4992039 21580001 UNIFORM SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 67.13 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.38 Total :73.51 119898 7/8/2010 073311 ASHER, KAREN ASHER0623 YOST REFUND REFUND FOR YOST 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 7.00 Total :7.00 119899 7/8/2010 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0088110-IN Fleet Premium Gas - 8300 Gal Fleet Premium Gas - 8300 Gal 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 19,566.42 St Excise Tax Gas, WA Oil Spill 511.000.657.548.680.340.12 3,281.82 Diesel 1900 Gal 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 4,210.21 St Excise Tax Diesel, WA Oil Spill 511.000.657.548.680.340.10 749.38 BIO Diesel 100 Gal 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 330.50 St Excise Tax BioDiesel, WA Oil Spill 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 40.90 2Page: Packet Page 37 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119899 7/8/2010 (Continued)071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 3.80 WA St Svc Fee 511.000.657.548.680.340.13 40.00 Total :28,223.03 119900 7/8/2010 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 56148 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 23.10 UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 23.10 UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 23.79 UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 97.46 UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 97.46 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 2.20 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 2.20 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 2.25 Total :271.56 119901 7/8/2010 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 13999 BURIAL SUPPLIES BURIAL SUPPLIES: CARR 130.000.640.536.200.340.00 388.00 Total :388.00 119902 7/8/2010 073308 AUTOMOBILE INC / DNA AUTO PRE20100003 Refund half of Pre-Ap fee for Refund half of Pre-Ap fee for 001.000.000.257.620.000.00 327.50 Total :327.50 3Page: Packet Page 38 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119903 7/8/2010 073035 AVAGIMOVA, KARINE 561 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 100.00 Total :100.00 119904 7/8/2010 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 74308 BADGE ARTS COMMISSION/BADGE 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 8.75 Freight 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 3.22 9.5% Sales Tax 117.100.640.573.100.310.00 1.14 Total :13.11 119905 7/8/2010 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON BAILEYS12460 TAEKWON DO CLASSES TAEKWON DO #12460 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 104.00 TAEKWON DO #12452 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 602.00 TAEKWON DO #12456 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 175.00 TOT TAEKWON DOBAILEYS12464 TOT TAEKWON DO #12464 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 83.20 Total :964.20 119906 7/8/2010 070992 BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011545853 COPIER RENTAL FEE COPIER RENTAL FEE 001.000.230.512.501.450.00 154.40 Total :154.40 119907 7/8/2010 002100 BARNARD, EARL 52 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 161.61 Total :161.61 119908 7/8/2010 072319 BEACH CAMP LLC BEACH CAMP12315 BEACH CAMP @ SUNSET BAY 4Page: Packet Page 39 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119908 7/8/2010 (Continued)072319 BEACH CAMP LLC BEACH CAMP @ SUNSET BAY 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 3,000.00 Total :3,000.00 119909 7/8/2010 060502 BERG, COLIN BERG12399 TAI CHI TAI CHI #12399 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 267.40 Total :267.40 119910 7/8/2010 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 3251 E8GA.SERVICES 5/22-6/18/10 E8GA.Services 5/22-6/18/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,289.19 Total :1,289.19 119911 7/8/2010 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 347 Modify Permit Trax and add the reviews Modify Permit Trax and add the reviews 001.000.620.524.100.490.00 72.50 Total :72.50 119912 7/8/2010 073321 BLAIR, JEANNE 6/30/10 Sister City gift Sister City gift 001.000.210.513.100.490.00 109.50 Total :109.50 119913 7/8/2010 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 796060 INV#796060 - EDMONDS PD - TRYKAR 5.11 JACKET 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 200.00 NAMETAG - TRYKAR 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.00 HEAT STAMP PANEL 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00 REFLECTIVE PANEL 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 21.28 INV#820657 - EDMONDS PD - COMPTON820657 5Page: Packet Page 40 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119913 7/8/2010 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC S/S UNIFORM SHIRTS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 131.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 12.48 Total :389.08 119914 7/8/2010 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 291514 CRUSHED ROCK CRUSHED ROCK 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 460.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 43.70 CRUSHED ROCK291633 CRUSHED ROCK 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 282.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 26.79 Total :812.49 119915 7/8/2010 003328 CASCADE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA CASCADE0706 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 119916 7/8/2010 003330 CASCADE TROPHY 30778 Employee service awards Employee service awards 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 834.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.490.00 79.23 Retirement plaque for G. Haakenson30799 Retirement plaque for G. Haakenson 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 92.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 8.79 Total :1,014.52 6Page: Packet Page 41 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119917 7/8/2010 003515 CH2M HILL INC 3749613 E6MA.SERVICES THRU 3/26/10 E6MA.Services thru 3/26/10 001.000.240.513.110.410.00 5,090.07 Total :5,090.07 119918 7/8/2010 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT12541 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #12541 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 120.40 Total :120.40 119919 7/8/2010 073315 CID, DALIA CID0630 REFUND REFUND FOR SWIM LESSONS 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 42.00 Total :42.00 119920 7/8/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2205227 LINERS, ETC. LINERS, CLEANER, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 628.47 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 59.70 YOST POOL SUPPLIESW2206489 SHAMPOO, CLEANER, LINERS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 176.05 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.72 Total :880.94 119921 7/8/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2205852 Fac Maint - Dust Pans, Towels, Fac Maint - Dust Pans, Towels, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 486.05 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.17 FAC - BroomsW2205852-1 FAC - Brooms 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 24.70 9.5% Sales Tax 7Page: Packet Page 42 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119921 7/8/2010 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.35 Total :559.27 119922 7/8/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2204200-1 005302 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 3.71 ANTIBACTERIAL SOAP 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 39.04 Total :42.75 119923 7/8/2010 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 35855 CODE UPDATES City Code Book Supplments 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 3,840.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 364.87 Total :4,205.57 119924 7/8/2010 070323 COMCAST 0721433 CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICES 130.000.640.536.200.420.00 113.56 Total :113.56 119925 7/8/2010 068473 COMMERCIAL SOUND & COMM.030714 Service call audio in Council Chambers Service call audio in Council Chambers 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 187.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 17.82 Total :205.32 119926 7/8/2010 062891 COOK PAGING WA 7957745 pagers-water pagers-water 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 3.95 9.2% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 0.29 Total :4.24 8Page: Packet Page 43 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119927 7/8/2010 005810 CRAIN, DOUGLAS 50 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 3,951.00 Total :3,951.00 119928 7/8/2010 072189 DATASITE 66070 SHREDDING SERVICES/CABINETS Doc Shred Services City Clerk 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 25.00 Doc Shred Services Finance 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 25.00 Total :50.00 119929 7/8/2010 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 062010 STATE LOBBYIST CHARGES FOR JUNE 2010 State lobbyist charges for June 2010 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 2,585.00 Total :2,585.00 119930 7/8/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001155/1 EDMONDS PARKS 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.91 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.58 EDMONDS PARKS001157/1 PAINTBRUSHES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.64 EDMONDS PARKS001158/1 SNAP BOLT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.49 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.00 Total :29.32 119931 7/8/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001159/1 FAC MAINT Unit 5 - Radiator Repair Supplies 9Page: Packet Page 44 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119931 7/8/2010 (Continued)073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.04 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.09 FAC MAINT001160/1 PS/PW - Fastener Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 5.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.53 Total :30.26 119932 7/8/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 23555 GREASE CARTRIDGES LITHIUM GREASE CARTRIDGES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 41.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.94 SUPPLIES23600 ZERK FITT 6MM STRAIGHT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.11 ADHESIVE23723 ADHESIVE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 6.88 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.65 Total :54.23 119933 7/8/2010 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP JANOO0628 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS FOR: MARIA, ARIBA, 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 260.00 Total :260.00 119934 7/8/2010 069912 EDMONDS PFD COE-HUD-007 REIMBURSE EXP FROM HUD GRANT ECA/PFD reimbursement of expenses from 001.000.610.519.700.410.00 34,582.87 10Page: Packet Page 45 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :34,582.87119934 7/8/2010 069912 069912 EDMONDS PFD 119935 7/8/2010 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-25150 9TH & CASPER ST (WEST PLANTER) 9TH & CASPER ST (WEST PLANTER) 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 23.80 9TH & CASPER ST (EAST PLANTER)2-25175 9TH & CASPER ST (EAST PLANTER) 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 29.92 SPRINKLER2-28275 SPRINKLER 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 34.01 MINI PARK2-37180 MINI PARK 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 33.13 WATER7-05276 820 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 101.82 Total :222.68 119936 7/8/2010 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 088586 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT Radix Monthly Maint Agreement -~ 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 152.00 Total :152.00 119937 7/8/2010 071967 ENG, STEPHEN ENG12302 TAE KWON DO CLASSES TAEKWON DO #12302 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 44.80 Total :44.80 119938 7/8/2010 068796 ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECH INT'L 10666 DIP STICK PRO/BALL VALVE KIT DIP STICK PRO/BALL VALVE KIT 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 344.90 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 30.00 Total :374.90 119939 7/8/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU20238 GLOVES 11Page: Packet Page 46 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119939 7/8/2010 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY NITRILE GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 103.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.79 GLOVESWAMOU20257 NITRILE GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 103.00 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.20 Total :230.31 119940 7/8/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU20332 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.17 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.25 Total :14.42 119941 7/8/2010 071026 FASTSIGNS OF LYNNWOOD 443 8254 WALK BACK IN TIME BANNERS BANNER SIGNS FOR WALK BACK IN TIME 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 208.90 9.5% Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 19.85 Total :228.75 119942 7/8/2010 064406 FBI LEEDA GANNON 10/18-20/10 GANNON, EDMONDS PD - 10/18 SEMINAR LEADERSHIP SEMINAR - CONDUCTING 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 300.00 Total :300.00 119943 7/8/2010 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 063010 PUBLIC DEFENDER PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.390.512.520.410.00 12,700.00 12Page: Packet Page 47 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :12,700.00119943 7/8/2010 009895 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 119944 7/8/2010 066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W FELIX12247 STOP SMOKING WITH HYPNOSIS STOP SMOKING WITH HYPNOSIS #12247 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 240.10 Total :240.10 119945 7/8/2010 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 288261 TENANT #101706 July-10 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent 001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00 Total :300.00 119946 7/8/2010 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 158684 June 2010 Section 125 & Section 132 June 2010 Section 125 & Section 132 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 78.30 Total :78.30 119947 7/8/2010 072448 GARDEN GATE GGATE0707 RENEWAL SUBSCRIPTION SUBSCRIPTION 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 20.00 Total :20.00 119948 7/8/2010 071956 GIETZEN, TERRI GIETZEN0622 REFUND REFUND - WITHDRAWAL FROM SWIM TEAM 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 155.00 Total :155.00 119949 7/8/2010 073316 GIN, HEATHER GIN0701 REFUND REFUND - CUSTOMER REQUEST 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 502.00 Total :502.00 119950 7/8/2010 012068 GLENNS WELDING & MFG 20190 Unit 91 - Replace Mower Crank Pin Hub Unit 91 - Replace Mower Crank Pin Hub 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 130.81 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 12.43 13Page: Packet Page 48 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :143.24119950 7/8/2010 012068 012068 GLENNS WELDING & MFG 119951 7/8/2010 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 095585 Unit 7 - Tires (4) Unit 7 - Tires (4) 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 449.96 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 42.75 Total :492.71 119952 7/8/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9275854041 BLOWER PSC BLOWER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 86.65 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.08 SEALANT9278687562 SILICONE SALANT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.08 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.08 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.26 Total :119.05 119953 7/8/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9281292590 Library - 12 V Battery Library - 12 V Battery 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.06 9.2% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.03 Fac Maint - Greaseless Lube9281292608 Fac Maint - Greaseless Lube 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.96 9.2% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.13 Total :61.18 14Page: Packet Page 49 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119954 7/8/2010 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 201001801 Unit 203 - Repairs 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 45.11 Unit 203 - Repairs 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 474.88 Unit 582 - Keyed Lock328307 Unit 582 - Keyed Lock 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.79 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.60 Total :538.38 119955 7/8/2010 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 108740 Unit 48 - Latch Unit 48 - Latch 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 201.88 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 19.18 Unit 336 - Condenser Assembly, Kit, O108840 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 30.52 Unit 336 - Condenser Assembly, Kit, O 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 321.22 Unit 650 - Condenser Assembly, Kit, O109168 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 30.52 Unit 650 - Condenser Assembly, Kit, O 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 321.22 Total :924.54 119956 7/8/2010 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 51 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 345.00 Total :345.00 119957 7/8/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1094396 0205 TOOL HOLDERS, ETC. 15Page: Packet Page 50 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119957 7/8/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.11 02052032922 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 29.88 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.84 02052208052 SUPPLIES 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 41.47 9.5% Sales Tax 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 3.94 02053034824 SUPPLIES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.03 02055043728 WIRE BRUSHES, COVERS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 30.62 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.91 0205582064 WATER NOZZLES, COUPLINGS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 27.33 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.60 02056032161 FRAME ACHORS, STEEL STAKES, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 187.62 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.82 02057031926 SAKRETE, ETC. 16Page: Packet Page 51 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119957 7/8/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 13.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.32 0205FCH-003778082 LATE FEE 001.000.640.576.800.490.00 20.00 Total :406.94 119958 7/8/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1027359 6035322500959949 STUD/SAKRETE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 21.28 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 2.02 60353225009599495038734 ELBOW/CLIP 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 19.99 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.90 60353225009599495563618 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1.02 U-BOLT/CUTTING TOOL 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 10.78 60353225009599497567367 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.50 PADLOCK 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 5.29 60353225009599497594563 PADLOCK 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 9.79 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 0.93 60353225009599498060804 9.5% Sales Tax 17Page: Packet Page 52 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119958 7/8/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.64 MASKING TAPE 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 69.94 Total :150.08 119959 7/8/2010 070896 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 8941 Fac Maint - PS - Supplies Fac Maint - PS - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 98.64 Fac Maint - Paper Towels 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 179.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.39 Total :304.18 119960 7/8/2010 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 20831 E6DA.SERVICES THRU 1/30/10 E6DA.Services thru 1/30/10 125.000.640.594.750.410.00 13,230.00 E6DA.SERVICES THRU 3/27/1021034 E6DA.Services thru 3/27/10 125.000.640.594.750.410.00 5,649.00 E6DA.SERVICES THRU 4/24/1021088 E6DA.Services thru 4/24/10 125.000.640.594.750.410.00 3,492.50 Total :22,371.50 119961 7/8/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82421250 COPIER LEASE PARK MAINTENANCE COPIER LEASE 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 25.99 Total :25.99 119962 7/8/2010 070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 82421249 C/A 467070-1003748A4 Finance Copier Rental 6/22-7/21/10 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 454.07 Meter Charges 4/23-5/24/10 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 152.13 18Page: Packet Page 53 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119962 7/8/2010 (Continued)070042 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 57.60 Total :663.80 119963 7/8/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5014356253 Meter charges for reception copy for Meter charges for reception copy for 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 8.01 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 0.76 Total :8.77 119964 7/8/2010 069179 INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC E8GC.Pmt 1 E8GC.SERVICES THRU 5/31/10 E8GC.Pmt 1.Services thru 5/31/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 38,917.85 E8GC.Pmt 1.Services thru 5/31/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 38,917.85 E8GC.Pmt 1.Services thru 5/31/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 38,917.84 E8GC.Retainage 1 412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -1,777.07 E8GC.Retainage 1 412.200.000.223.400.000.00 -1,777.07 E8GC.Retainage 1 412.300.000.223.400.000.00 -1,777.07 Total :111,422.33 119965 7/8/2010 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 471920 54278825 HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,171.34 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.53 301.28 Total :3,472.62 119966 7/8/2010 073312 JOHNSON, GRETCHEN S JOHNSON0624 REFUND REFUND FOR SWIM TEAM 19Page: Packet Page 54 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119966 7/8/2010 (Continued)073312 JOHNSON, GRETCHEN S 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 177.00 Total :177.00 119967 7/8/2010 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY ULVESTAD12601 CREATIVE USE OF LIGHT CREATIVE USE OF LIGHT #12601 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 73.50 Total :73.50 119968 7/8/2010 072728 KAVADAS, JANET KAVADAS12433 WEIGHT ROOM ORIENTATION WEIGHT ROOM ORIENTATION #12433 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 10.50 Total :10.50 119969 7/8/2010 073285 KLEINERT, RENATE KLEINERT0610 GYMNASTICS SHOW PHOTOGRAPHY Photographer for gymnastics for show 001.000.640.575.550.410.00 120.00 Total :120.00 119970 7/8/2010 068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0410-108246 E8GC.SERVICES THRU 3/31/10 E8GC.Services thru 3/31/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 813.89 E8GC.Services thru 3/31/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 813.89 E8GC.Services thru 3/31/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 813.90 E8GC.SERVICES THRU 4/30/100510-108246 E8GC.Services thru 4/30/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 607.34 E8GC.Services thru 4/30/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 607.34 E8GC.Services thru 4/30/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 607.34 E8GC.SERVICES THRU 5/31/100610-108246 E8GC.Services thru 5/31/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 525.34 20Page: Packet Page 55 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119970 7/8/2010 (Continued)068396 KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS E8GC.Services thru 5/31/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 525.34 E8GC.Services thru 5/31/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 525.34 Total :5,839.72 119971 7/8/2010 070285 KPLU-FM IN-1100622458 RADIO ADVERTISING FOR WEEK OF 05/31/10 Tourism radio advertising for week of 001.000.240.513.110.440.00 950.00 Total :950.00 119972 7/8/2010 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 06172010-03 City Cars - 2 Washes City Cars - 2 Washes 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 10.06 Total :10.06 119973 7/8/2010 073136 LANG, ROBERT 06242010 MONITOR FOR ECON DEVE COMM 6/24/10 Monitor for Economic Development 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 36.00 Total :36.00 119974 7/8/2010 073317 LECOMPTE, LIBBY LECOMPTE0630 REFUND REFUND FOR SWIM LESSONS 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 155.00 Total :155.00 119975 7/8/2010 073318 LEE, HE YOUN LEE0628 REFUND REFUND - CUSTOMER REQUEST 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 45.00 Total :45.00 119976 7/8/2010 072059 LEE, NICOLE 544 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 119.60 Total :119.60 21Page: Packet Page 56 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119977 7/8/2010 069634 LEXISNEXIS 1201641-20100630 INV 1201641-20100630 EDMONDS PD SEARCHES & REPORTS JUNE 2010 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 81.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 7.79 Total :89.74 119978 7/8/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104544 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 336.44 SUPPLIES104568 SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 5.48 Total :341.92 119979 7/8/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104533I Office supplies - Mayor's office Office supplies - Mayor's office 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 144.54 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 13.73 Office Supplies - Mayor's Office104557 Office Supplies - Mayor's Office 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 82.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 7.88 Office Supplies - Mayor's office104562I Office Supplies - Mayor's office 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 32.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.210.513.100.310.00 3.09 Total :284.71 119980 7/8/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104502 1 pk paper clips. 1 pk paper clips. 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 2.29 9.5% Sales Tax 22Page: Packet Page 57 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119980 7/8/2010 (Continued)018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 0.22 Misc. office supplies including binders104526 Misc. office supplies including binders 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 113.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 10.74 Misc. office supplies including facial104534 Misc. office supplies including facial 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 15.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 1.52 Misc. office supplies including Uniball104538 Misc. office supplies including Uniball 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 26.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 2.50 Misc. office supplies including back104552 Misc. office supplies including back 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 98.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 9.39 Total :280.84 119981 7/8/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104575I EDMCTY COFFEE FILTER/PENS/CDR DISC/NOTE PADS 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 46.94 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.41 4.46 Total :51.40 119982 7/8/2010 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 312502-00 Fac Maint - Aluminum Supplies Fac Maint - Aluminum Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 48.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.56 23Page: Packet Page 58 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :52.56119982 7/8/2010 019582 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 119983 7/8/2010 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1188 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25 INTERPRETER FEE1189 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.501.410.01 88.25 INTERPRETER FEE1190 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25 INTERPRETER FEE559 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.230.512.500.410.01 88.25 Total :353.00 119984 7/8/2010 019650 MASTER POOLS OF WASHINGTON INC 54536 YOST POOL SUPPLIES BIOGUARD, REAGENTS, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 34.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.29 Total :37.89 119985 7/8/2010 072801 MCGUIRE, ANGELA MCGUIRE12738 GIRLS BASKETBALL CAMP GIRLS BASKETBALL CAMP #12738 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 507.00 Total :507.00 119986 7/8/2010 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 58322841 123106800 ALUMINUM 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 131.92 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 63.51 12310680058913441 STEEL STRUT CHANNEL/STUD ANCHOR 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 1,461.40 Freight 24Page: Packet Page 59 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119986 7/8/2010 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 111.88 Total :1,768.71 119987 7/8/2010 073313 MILLER, HEATHER MILLER0623 YOST REFUND REFUND FOR DROP IN SWIM 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 2.00 Total :2.00 119988 7/8/2010 022009 MOTOROLA INC 76379676 INV#76379676, A/C#1011249259 0001 EDMOND REPAIR RADIO #466CDS0624 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 393.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 37.34 Total :430.34 119989 7/8/2010 024300 NEBAR HOSE & FITTINGS LLC 212963-001 DUROFLEX DUROFLEX 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.44 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.40 Total :45.84 119990 7/8/2010 073319 NEILSEN, SUZANNE NEILSEN0628 REFUND REFUND - WITHDRAWAL FROM AM CARE 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 195.00 Total :195.00 119991 7/8/2010 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0431449-IN Fleet Fileter Inventory Fleet Fileter Inventory 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 60.31 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.340.40 5.73 Total :66.04 119992 7/8/2010 070788 NETRIVER INC 50138 BIRDFEST WEBSITE HOSTING Bird Fest quarterly billing for website 25Page: Packet Page 60 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119992 7/8/2010 (Continued)070788 NETRIVER INC 120.000.310.575.420.410.00 29.85 Total :29.85 119993 7/8/2010 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S3461598.001 Fishing Pier - Elect Supplies Fishing Pier - Elect Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.18 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.59 Total :6.77 119994 7/8/2010 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 12511 260 SODIUM BISULFITE 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 933.80 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.54 88.71 Total :1,022.51 119995 7/8/2010 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-140477 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: MADRONA ELEMENTARY 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 101.20 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-140595 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: YOST PARK POOL 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 222.89 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-141338 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL: HUMMINGBIRD PARK 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 141.20 HONEY BUCKET RENTAL1-141804 23700 104TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.450.00 305.16 Total :770.45 119996 7/8/2010 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 142 Planning Board Minutes on 6/23/10. Planning Board Minutes on 6/23/10. 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 384.00 Total :384.00 26Page: Packet Page 61 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119997 7/8/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 038514 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 49.36 SUPPLIES038906 SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 7.48 SUPPLIES038907 SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.501.310.00 7.48 SUPPLIES058069 SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 35.22 SUPPLIES119098 SUPPLIES 001.000.230.512.500.310.00 526.09 Total :625.63 119998 7/8/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 030570 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 384.45 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 36.52 Total :420.97 119999 7/8/2010 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER June, 2010 JUN-10 COURT BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL Emergency Medical Services & Trauma 001.000.000.237.120.000.00 1,548.97 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.000.237.130.000.00 31,546.59 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.000.237.150.000.00 94.50 State Patrol Death Investigations 001.000.000.237.170.000.00 633.23 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.000.237.180.000.00 5,301.53 School Zone Safety Account 27Page: Packet Page 62 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 119999 7/8/2010 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 001.000.000.237.200.000.00 655.92 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.000.237.250.000.00 3,044.73 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.000.237.260.000.00 602.82 Total :43,428.29 120000 7/8/2010 025889 OGDEN MURPHY AND WALLACE 684387 Legislative Legal Prof Ser for May 2010 Legislative Legal Prof Ser for May 2010 001.000.110.511.100.410.00 3,147.20 Total :3,147.20 120001 7/8/2010 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 WATER 220TH ST SW & 84TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 11.88 WATER0001520 820 15TH ST SW/CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 31.57 WATER0001530 820 15TH ST SW - CEMETERY 130.000.640.536.500.470.00 59.15 WATER0002930 5TH & ST RTE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 23.62 WATER0005060 9803 EDMONDS WAY 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 13.17 Total :139.39 120002 7/8/2010 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 002140 0 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 149.87 Total :149.87 120003 7/8/2010 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 101581 BRUSH DUMP BRUSH DUMP 6/9/10 28Page: Packet Page 63 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120003 7/8/2010 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 158.40 BRUSH DUMP101592 brush dump 6/9/10 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 158.40 BRUSH DUMP101640 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.40 BRUSH DUMP101649 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 198.00 BRUSH DUMP101655 BRUSH DUMP 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 198.00 Total :847.20 120004 7/8/2010 066817 PANASONIC DIGITAL DOCUMENT COM 011545851 COPIER CONTRACT COPIER CONTRACT 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 145.22 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.41 13.45 Total :158.67 120005 7/8/2010 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.942473 PAINT SUPPLIES BASE PAINT 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.11 Total :35.81 120006 7/8/2010 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH0707 DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001.000.640.575.530.310.00 198.86 Total :198.86 120007 7/8/2010 069633 PET PROS EPD-010 INV#EPD-010 - EDMONDS PD HAWLEY/MCCLURE NUTRO HIGH ENERGY 35# 29Page: Packet Page 64 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120007 7/8/2010 (Continued)069633 PET PROS 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 531.91 PRECISE PLUS 33# 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 270.71 AVO ACTIVE CARE CHICKEN 30# 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 237.46 8.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.310.00 88.41 Total :1,128.49 120008 7/8/2010 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS 1444 INV#1444 EDMONDS PD - HAWLEY WINTER WGT JUMPSUITS 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 700.00 UNDER ARM VENTS 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 50.00 NAME PATCH - HAWLEY 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 20.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 25.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 75.53 Total :870.53 120009 7/8/2010 072384 PLAY-WELL TEKNOLOGIES PLAYWELL12224 LEGOS ENGINEERING CAMP LEGO CAMP #12224 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 3,000.00 LEGO CAMP #12227 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 3,000.00 Total :6,000.00 120010 7/8/2010 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 185393 Street - Conflict Monitor Shipping Fees Street - Conflict Monitor Shipping Fees 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 158.12 Shipping Packaging 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 31.50 9.5% Sales Tax 30Page: Packet Page 65 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120010 7/8/2010 (Continued)071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.96 WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST185396 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25 WATER SEWER STREET STORM-L&I RETURN POST185501 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 111.000.653.542.900.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.652.542.900.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 2.24 Water Sewer Street Storm - L&I Safety 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 2.25 Total :210.52 120011 7/8/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 7918807004 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 3,985.07 Total :3,985.07 120012 7/8/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 3689976003 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg 200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 156.47 Total :156.47 120013 7/8/2010 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 PUGET SOUND ENERGY PUGET SOUND ENERGY 411.000.656.538.800.472.63 40.17 Total :40.17 31Page: Packet Page 66 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120014 7/8/2010 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 10-374 COURT SECURITY COURT SECURITY 001.000.230.512.500.410.00 3,102.50 Total :3,102.50 120015 7/8/2010 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 10-2447 Unit 31 - Cuffed Rubber Debris Hoses, Unit 31 - Cuffed Rubber Debris Hoses, 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1,130.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 107.36 Total :1,237.46 120016 7/8/2010 060889 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL ARV/12672791 Shop - Spark Plug Socket Shop - Spark Plug Socket 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 30.56 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 14.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 4.33 Total :49.84 120017 7/8/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2004-9314-6 19827 89TH PL W 19827 89TH PL W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 30.02 131 SUNSET AVE2006-6395-3 131 SUNSET AVE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 127.37 23202 EDMONDS WAY2009-4334-8 23202 EDMONDS WAY 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 119.94 50 RAILROAD AVE2010-5432-7 50 RAILROAD AVE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 100.84 100 RAILROAD AVE2021-3965-5 100 RAILROAD AVE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 36.05 32Page: Packet Page 67 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120017 7/8/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 24000 78TH AVE W2026-2041-5 24000 78TH AVE W 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 31.04 Total :445.26 120018 7/8/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202919 LIFT STATION #8 113 RR AVE LIFT STATION #8 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 278.50 BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK 23602 76TH200274959 BEACON LIGHT CROSS WALK~ 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 34.87 TRAFFIC LIGHT 220TH 76TH200493153 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 54.27 LIFT STATION #9200611317 LIFT STATION #9 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 196.66 DECORATIVE LIGHTS 115 2ND AVE S200913853 deocrative lighting 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 31.04 SIGNAL LIGHT 23800 FIRDALE AVE201103561 SIGNAL LIGHT - 23800 Firdale Ave 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 49.87 SCHOOL LIGHT 21506 84TH W201151420 SCHOOL FLASHING LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.04 Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger201427317 Ballinger Lift Station 7403 Ballinger 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 31.04 LIFT STATION 7201532926 Lift St 7 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 358.01 23190 100TH W SCHOOL CROSSWALK LITE201703758 23190 100th W School Crosswalk Lite 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 92.69 33Page: Packet Page 68 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120018 7/8/2010 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 STREET LIGHTING (150 WATTS = 183 LIGHTS201711785 Street Lighting (150 Watts = 183 lights 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 1,406.33 FIRE STATION #20202077194 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 858.29 SIGNAL LIGHT 22400 HWY 99202289096 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 98.75 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH202356739 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 36.43 LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS202499539 LIFT STATION #1 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 830.28 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (200WATTS:303202529186 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (200WATTS:303 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 5,299.48 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (400WATTS:13 LITES)202529202 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTING (400WATTS:13 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 368.48 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (250WATTS:58 LITES)202579488 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (250WATTS:58 LITES) 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 596.97 Total :10,653.00 120019 7/8/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 106903990 2025-7952-0 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 15.34 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.62 0.44 Total :15.78 120020 7/8/2010 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER June-2010 Jun-10 Crime Victims Court Remittance Jun-10 Crime Victims Court Remittance 34Page: Packet Page 69 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120020 7/8/2010 (Continued)070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 001.000.000.237.140.000.00 853.55 Total :853.55 120021 7/8/2010 038500 SO COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC 297 JUN-10 RECREATION SERVIES CONTRACT FEE 06/10 Recreation Servies Contract Fee 001.000.390.519.900.410.00 5,000.00 Total :5,000.00 120022 7/8/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03583 garbage & recycle for PS garbage & recycle for PS 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 550.74 garbage & recycle for FAC03585 garbage & recycle for FAC 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 674.47 garbage & recycle for Library03586 garbage & recycle for Library 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 555.23 garbage & recycle-City Hall03588 garbage & recycle-City Hall 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 459.89 Total :2,240.33 120023 7/8/2010 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q2, 2010 Q2 2010 LEASEHOLD TAX LIABILITY Q2, 2010 Leasehold Tax Liability 001.000.000.237.220.000.00 5,130.26 Total :5,130.26 120024 7/8/2010 046200 STATE OF WASHINGTON Q1 2010 balance Balance of Q1, 2010 Leasehold tax pmt Balance of Q1, 2010 Leasehold tax pmt 001.000.000.237.220.000.00 441.00 Total :441.00 120025 7/8/2010 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 2939468 Shop Tool - Bridge Clamp Shop Tool - Bridge Clamp 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 36.01 9.5% Sales Tax 35Page: Packet Page 70 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120025 7/8/2010 (Continued)009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 3.42 Fleet Shop Supplies2942056 Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 74.32 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 7.06 Total :120.81 120026 7/8/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2235000 HAINES WHARF PARK ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR HAINES WHARF 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 519.15 Freight 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 17.54 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.310.00 50.99 Total :587.68 120027 7/8/2010 068619 SWENSON, LINDA 1208 CRAZE COVER PHOTO CRAZE SEPT - DEC 2010 COVER PHOTO 001.000.640.574.200.490.00 149.67 Total :149.67 120028 7/8/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10020654 WASHERS STEEL FLAT WASHERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.58 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.01 SUPPLIES10021228 POLY GAS CAN 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.74 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.83 Total :21.16 120029 7/8/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10022998 Shop Supplies - Vac Caps 36Page: Packet Page 71 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120029 7/8/2010 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC Shop Supplies - Vac Caps 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 21.43 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 2.04 Shop Supplies - Nuts, Screws, Pins,10022999 Shop Supplies - Nuts, Screws, Pins, 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 100.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 9.56 Shop Supplies - Threaded Rods, Washers,18907251 Shop Supplies - Threaded Rods, Washers, 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 34.86 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 3.31 Total :171.79 120030 7/8/2010 072790 TCC PRINTING & IMAGING 68867 PRINTING OF EVENTS CALENDAR Printing of events calendar July - Dec 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 777.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.240.513.110.490.00 73.90 Total :851.79 120031 7/8/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 108763 SUMMER CAMPS & POOL AD SUMMER CAMPS & POOL AD 001.000.640.574.200.440.00 331.50 Total :331.50 120032 7/8/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1700389 NEWSPAPER AD 07/06 Hearing (murals) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 54.04 NEWSPAPER AD1700474 Ordinance 3798 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 33.88 NEWSPAPER AD1700475 37Page: Packet Page 72 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120032 7/8/2010 (Continued)009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY Ordinance 3797 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 32.20 NEWSPAPER AD1700484 Ordinance 3799 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 37.24 NEWSPAPER AD1700605 07/06 Hearing (water rates) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 55.72 NEWSPAPER AD1700738 07/06 Hearing (Storm) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 72.52 NEWSPAPER AD1700739 07/06 Hearing (water) 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 87.64 NEWSPAPER ADS1701353 Council & Plan Brd Agendas 001.000.250.514.300.440.00 1,705.82 Total :2,079.06 120033 7/8/2010 073320 THE GOTHARD SISTERS GOTHARD0711 PARK CONCERT PRESENTER PARK CONCERT: SUNDAY JULY 11, 2010 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 800.00 Total :800.00 120034 7/8/2010 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 195643 Sr Center - Mechanic Replaced Failed Sr Center - Mechanic Replaced Failed 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 562.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 53.39 Museum - Installation of Lubricating195644 Museum - Installation of Lubricating 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 2,082.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 197.79 CITY HALL ELEVATOR554773 38Page: Packet Page 73 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120034 7/8/2010 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CITY HALL ELEVATOR 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 850.28 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 80.77 MONITORING-PS554774 Monitoring-PS 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 41.90 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE564130 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 154.98 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 14.71 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MONITORING564131 SENIOR CENTER ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 12.61 Total :4,050.43 120035 7/8/2010 073310 UNISAFE INC 685073 GLOVES GLOVES 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 207.60 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 30.00 Total :237.60 120036 7/8/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425-673-5978 LIFT STATION #1 Lift Station #1 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 50.06 FS # 16425-771-0158 FS #16 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 164.35 Total :214.41 120037 7/8/2010 073314 WCOG WCOG0624 REFUND REFUND OF DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 200.00 39Page: Packet Page 74 of 208 07/08/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 2:50:05PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :200.00120037 7/8/2010 073314 073314 WCOG 120038 7/8/2010 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 503 SOFTBALL UMPIRING UMPIRING @ MEN'S AND CO-ED SOFTBALL 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 1,683.00 Total :1,683.00 Bank total :366,414.62147 Vouchers for bank code :front 366,414.62Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report147 40Page: Packet Page 75 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120039 7/15/2010 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 710420 DAY CAMP SHIRTS DAYCAMP SHIRTS 001.000.640.575.530.310.00 156.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.530.310.00 14.88 TENNIS TEAM SHIRTS710421 SHIRTS FOR TENNIS TEAM 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 196.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.520.310.00 18.70 Total :386.98 120040 7/15/2010 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000002007 Traffic - Pedestrian Buttons - Bulldog Traffic - Pedestrian Buttons - Bulldog 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 301.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 28.60 Total :329.60 120041 7/15/2010 066417 AIRGAS NOR PAC INC 101587636 M5Z34 CAL GAS 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 25.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.22 2.38 M5Z34101599529 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 58.50 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 5.56 Total :91.44 120042 7/15/2010 073323 ALBER, LELA ALBER0706 REFUND REFUND DUE TO MEDICAL SITUATION 001.000.000.239.200.000.00 410.00 1Page: Packet Page 76 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :410.001200427/15/2010 073323 073323 ALBER, LELA 120043 7/15/2010 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 8875 Monthly Wholesale Charges fo Monthly Wholesale Charges fo 411.000.654.534.800.330.00 111,532.91 Total :111,532.91 120044 7/15/2010 061540 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0197-001234815 FIRE STATION #20 FIRE STATION #20 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 121.71 Public Works Facility0197-001234902 Public Works Facility 001.000.650.519.910.470.00 24.56 Public Works Facility 111.000.653.542.900.470.00 93.32 Public Works Facility 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 93.32 Public Works Facility 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 93.32 Public Works Facility 511.000.657.548.680.470.00 93.32 Public Works Facility 411.000.652.542.900.470.00 93.33 FS 160197-001234972 garbage for F/S #16 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 126.63 MCH0197-001235649 garbage for MCH 001.000.651.519.920.470.00 57.40 Total :796.91 120045 7/15/2010 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-109152 PARKS SIGN STENCIL STENCILS - NO PARKING/FIRE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 119.90 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.40 2Page: Packet Page 77 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120045 7/15/2010 (Continued)063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 12.19 Total :140.49 120046 7/15/2010 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 2078 YOST PARK IMPROVEMENT TAKE DOWN DAMAGED ALDER & HAUL AWAY 125.000.640.576.800.480.00 2,600.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.640.576.800.480.00 247.00 Total :2,847.00 120047 7/15/2010 073072 ALS TECHNOLOGIES INC 19865 INV#19865 - EDMONDS PD HORNETS NEST .60 CAL 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 82.60 REACT PROJECTILE 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 158.80 MULTI SMOKE, CS 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 95.80 MULTI SMOKE, WHITE SMOKE 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 95.80 TRIPLE ACTION, CS GRENADE 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 77.00 TRIPLE ACTION, WT SMOKE GRENADE 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 76.90 BODY DIVERSION DEV., STEEL 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 91.90 FUSE, RELOAD DEVICE 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 99.40 Freight 001.000.410.521.230.310.00 148.93 Total :927.13 120048 7/15/2010 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC QZ85 EDMONDS NPDES TESTING 411.000.656.538.800.410.31 130.00 3Page: Packet Page 78 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :130.001200487/15/2010 064335 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC 120049 7/15/2010 066025 ANDERSON, ANGIE ANDERSON0710 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 001.000.640.574.100.410.00 285.00 Total :285.00 120050 7/15/2010 065378 APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECH 40356908 Unit 91 - Sperical Plane Bearings Unit 91 - Sperical Plane Bearings 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 275.88 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 27.06 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 28.78 Total :331.72 120051 7/15/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-5003928 UNIFORM SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 32.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.04 Total :35.04 120052 7/15/2010 069751 ARAMARK 655-5003933 21580001 UNIFORM SERVICE 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 67.13 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.38 Total :73.51 120053 7/15/2010 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0088656-IN 01-7500014 DIESEL FUEL 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 1,726.60 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.320.00 164.02 Total :1,890.62 4Page: Packet Page 79 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120054 7/15/2010 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 56099 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 88.59 UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 88.59 UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 91.26 UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage 411.000.654.534.800.420.00 285.76 UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage 411.000.655.535.800.420.00 285.76 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.490.00 8.42 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.490.00 8.42 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.490.00 8.66 Total :865.46 120055 7/15/2010 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 74277 SWIM RIBBONS SWIM RIBBONS 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 705.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.575.510.310.00 67.01 Total :772.29 120056 7/15/2010 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0610 Background check services Background check services 001.000.220.516.100.410.00 280.00 Total :280.00 120057 7/15/2010 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 2008-968 INV 2008-968 EDMONDS PD PRE-EMPLOY SCREENING - STRONG 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 150.00 Total :150.00 5Page: Packet Page 80 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120058 7/15/2010 072319 BEACH CAMP LLC BEACHCAMP12316 BEACH CAMP @ SUNSET BAY BEACH CAMP #12316 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,320.00 Total :2,320.00 120059 7/15/2010 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 3258 E8GB.SERVICES 5/22-6/18/10 E8GB.Services 5/22-6/18/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 2,466.10 Total :2,466.10 120060 7/15/2010 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC 807555-83 CREDIT ON SCHEELE #807555-01 AND 03 CR FOR OVERCHARGE ON SWEATER 001.000.410.521.110.240.00 -10.70 CR FOR OVERCHARGE ON PANTSG 001.000.410.521.110.240.00 -13.47 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.240.00 -2.30 INV#808178 EDMONDS PD - POFF808178 BALLISTIC VEST 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 750.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 71.25 INV#809829-01 EDMONDS PD - FROLAND809829-01 5 IN 1 JACKET 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 200.00 NAMETAGS 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 11.00 APPLY HEAT STAMP 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 5.00 REFLECTIVE POLICE PANEL 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 8.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.240.00 21.28 INV#809936-01 EDMONDS PD - HARBINSON809936-01 DEHNER MOTORCYCLE BOOTS 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 420.00 6Page: Packet Page 81 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120060 7/15/2010 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORM CO INC VIBRAM LUG SOLE 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 40.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.710.240.00 43.70 Total :1,543.76 120061 7/15/2010 003074 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 40247810 FENCED PARK AREA @ MARINA BEACH LEASE FOR FENCED PARK AREA @ MARINA 001.000.640.574.100.450.00 1,565.03 Total :1,565.03 120062 7/15/2010 002840 BRIM TRACTOR CO INC IL30854 Unit 91 - Upper Pivot Base Unit 91 - Upper Pivot Base 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 63.25 Freight 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 6.95 Total :80.15 120063 7/15/2010 071510 BUCK, ALICIA BUCK12243 ART FOR KIDZ DOODLE DOTS #12243 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 385.00 DOODLE DOTS #12438 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 171.50 MINI MARKERS #12241 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 511.00 Total :1,067.50 120064 7/15/2010 061741 CASCADE SAWING & DRILLING 129738 EDM010 CORE DRILLLING 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 570.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 54.15 EDM010129739 7Page: Packet Page 82 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120064 7/15/2010 (Continued)061741 CASCADE SAWING & DRILLING STRUCTUAL IMAGING 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 581.25 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.480.21 55.22 Total :1,260.62 120065 7/15/2010 068484 CEMEX 9419611439 Roadway - Asphalt Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 140.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 13.30 Street - Sidewalk Cement9419611440 Street - Sidewalk Cement 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 240.00 9.2% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 22.08 Street - Sidewalk Cement9419619655 Street - Sidewalk Cement 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 280.00 9.2% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.610.310.00 25.76 Total :721.14 120066 7/15/2010 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN06101042 2954000 CYLINDER RENTAL 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 33.20 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.450.21 3.15 Total :36.35 120067 7/15/2010 064840 CHAPUT, KAREN E CHAPUT12542 FRIDAY NIGHT OUT FRIDAY NIGHT OUT #12542 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 28.00 Total :28.00 8Page: Packet Page 83 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120068 7/15/2010 061773 CHAVE, ROBERT Chave3/10 Northwestern University - "Decision Northwestern University - "Decision 001.000.620.558.600.490.00 900.00 Total :900.00 120069 7/15/2010 072351 CHILDREN'S TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP CTW12237 I CAMPS ICAMP #12237 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 832.00 ICAMP #12238 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 2,444.00 ICAMP #12269 001.000.640.574.200.410.00 3,040.00 Total :6,316.00 120070 7/15/2010 068183 CHINN, PENNY AN45970 Refund of time loss on City paid Refund of time loss on City paid 001.000.651.519.920.110.00 79.20 Total :79.20 120071 7/15/2010 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 450901-1006 E9GA.SERVICES THRU 6/10 E9GA.Services thru June 2010 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 26,993.60 Total :26,993.60 120072 7/15/2010 066070 CIT TECHNOLOGY FIN SERV INC 17222098 COPIER LEASE PW copier lease for PW 001.000.650.519.910.450.00 607.12 Total :607.12 120073 7/15/2010 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS Bld20100471 Bldg permit & fees for Finance Bldg permit & fees for Finance 001.000.310.514.230.490.00 226.50 Total :226.50 120074 7/15/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7996 INV#7996 CUST#45 - EDMONDS PD NEXTEL PHONES - NARCS 06/2010 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.61 9Page: Packet Page 84 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120074 7/15/2010 (Continued)019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD INV#7997 CUST#1430 - EDMONDS PD7997 VERIZON PHONES 06/10 - NARCS 104.000.410.521.210.420.00 56.12 Total :112.73 120075 7/15/2010 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 7991 MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEWER COSTS 411.000.655.535.800.472.00 13,800.83 Total :13,800.83 120076 7/15/2010 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 2-533584-460571 Water Useage for the month of June 2010 Water Useage for the month of June 2010 411.000.654.534.800.330.00 674.34 Total :674.34 120077 7/15/2010 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2205227-1 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 177.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 16.90 CLEANERW2205227-2 INSTANT CLEANER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 118.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.24 CLEANERW2206489-1 INSTANT CLEANER 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 59.76 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.68 CLEANING SUPPLIESW2208828 TOILET TISSUE, BLEACH, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 487.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 46.36 10Page: Packet Page 85 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120077 7/15/2010 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS CLEANING SUPPLIESW2208828-1 BLEACH, ETC. 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 28.27 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.69 Total :955.08 120078 7/15/2010 070300 CODE 4 INC 8099 INV 8099 EDMONDS PD - HAWLEY CISM: LINE OF DUTY DEATH 8/16-17/10 001.000.410.521.400.490.00 199.00 Total :199.00 120079 7/15/2010 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC July-10 C/A CITYOED00001 July-10 Fiber Optics Internet 001.000.310.518.870.420.00 913.50 Total :913.50 120080 7/15/2010 071308 COLELLA, TERESA COLELLA0629 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT @ MEADOWDALE 001.000.640.575.520.410.00 192.00 Total :192.00 120081 7/15/2010 072189 DATASITE 66104 INV#66104 - EDMONDS PD SHREDDING 1-64 GALLON TOTE 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 40.00 Total :40.00 120082 7/15/2010 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 147944 Unit 411 - Radio Repair Unit 411 - Radio Repair 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 151.25 9.2% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 13.95 Total :165.20 120083 7/15/2010 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2010060118 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for June-2010 11Page: Packet Page 86 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120083 7/15/2010 (Continued)047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 001.000.310.518.880.420.00 293.64 Total :293.64 120084 7/15/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3115 INV#10-3115 - EDMONDS PD TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-3630 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 54.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #IA09-005 001.000.410.521.100.410.00 69.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #09-1539 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 162.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #10-1498 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 51.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #10-1889 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 69.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #10-0056 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 159.00 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #10-0172 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 78.00 TRANSCRIPTIONS CASE #10-1635 001.000.410.521.210.410.00 51.00 Total :693.00 120085 7/15/2010 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 10-3116 MINUTE TAKING 7/6 Council Minutes 001.000.250.514.300.410.00 420.00 Total :420.00 120086 7/15/2010 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 10-1726.1 DAYTON STREET SSMH LOCATE Dayton Street SSMH Locate 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,600.00 Total :1,600.00 120087 7/15/2010 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 245727 INV#245727 - EDMONDS PD SPANISH INTERPRETING #10-2152 001.000.410.521.220.410.00 52.50 12Page: Packet Page 87 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :52.501200877/15/2010 060933 060933 DYNAMIC LANGUAGE CENTER 120088 7/15/2010 073037 EDMONDS ACE HARDWARE 001161/1 EDMONDS PARKS PADLOCK 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 31.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.04 EDMONDS PARKS001162/1 BUNGEE CORDS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.47 EDMONDS PARKS001163/1 KEY RINGS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 9.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.95 EDMONDS PARKS001164/1 COUPLINGS, IBBB HOSE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.56 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.38 EDMONDS PARKS001165/1 MISC. FASTENERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 0.09 Total :68.35 120089 7/15/2010 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 24233 SUPPLIES OIL FILTERS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.42 Total :16.38 13Page: Packet Page 88 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120090 7/15/2010 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP AGUIRRE0713 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS YOUTH SCHOLARSHIPS: OMAR, OSCAR AND 122.000.640.574.100.490.00 120.00 Total :120.00 120091 7/15/2010 069042 EVERETT HYDRAULICS INC 0000014699 Unit 91 - Cylinder Unit 91 - Cylinder 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 535.10 9.2% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 49.23 Total :584.33 120092 7/15/2010 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU20384 NITRILE GLOVES NITRILE GLOVES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 103.00 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 4.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.24 Total :118.04 120093 7/15/2010 072515 GOOGLE INC 1418516 INTERNET ANTI-VIRUS & SPAM MAINT FEE July-10 Internet Anti-Virus & Spam 001.000.310.518.880.480.00 523.33 Total :523.33 120094 7/15/2010 012199 GRAINGER 92854442290 EAR PLUGS, EAR MUFFS EAR PLUGS, EAR MUFFS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 73.59 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 8.37 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.79 Total :89.75 120095 7/15/2010 012199 GRAINGER 9271166473 Sewer - Capacitor Sewer - Capacitor 14Page: Packet Page 89 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120095 7/15/2010 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 2.71 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 0.25 Sewer - Start Capacitor9271206915 Sewer - Start Capacitor 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 14.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.41 Sewer - Run Capacitors9272065922 Sewer - Run Capacitors 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 19.35 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 1.85 Total :40.49 120096 7/15/2010 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007B5342 036570 VALVE DIAPHRAGMS CPVC 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3,496.00 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 160.41 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 347.36 036570007B5421 PIPE/CPVC/ELBOW 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 865.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 82.27 Total :4,951.96 120097 7/15/2010 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007B5263 Water Quality - Pump Tubes Water Quality - Pump Tubes 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 528.00 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.22 9.5% Sales Tax 15Page: Packet Page 90 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120097 7/15/2010 (Continued)060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 51.23 Total :590.45 120098 7/15/2010 062383 HEPBURN INDUSTRIES IN092480 PORTABLE HARD TOP CHAPEL PORTABLE HARD TOP CHAPEL FOR CEMETERY, 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 5,134.55 Freight 130.000.640.536.500.310.00 430.00 Total :5,564.55 120099 7/15/2010 013500 HINGSON, ROBERT 55 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 22.52 Total :22.52 120100 7/15/2010 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1040094 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 29.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.85 PW - Repair Supplies112084 PW - Repair Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.03 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.33 Parks - Supplies2037064 Parks - Supplies 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 3.12 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 0.30 Fac Maint Shop - Supplies2039400 Fac Maint Shop - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 37.88 Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 113.34 16Page: Packet Page 91 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120100 7/15/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.37 MCH - Facia Boards2039408 MCH - Facia Boards 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 22.94 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.18 MCH - Pledge2041697 MCH - Pledge 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 11.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.14 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Plastic Anchors,2044310 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Plastic Anchors, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 78.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.50 Fac Maint Shop - Wood, Glides, Catches,3041565 Fac Maint Shop - Wood, Glides, Catches, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 74.30 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 7.06 Traffic - Wire Stripper, Plyers,3593472 Traffic - Wire Stripper, Plyers, 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 82.68 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 7.85 Fac Maint - Shop - Studs37538 Fac Maint - Shop - Studs 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 18.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.71 PW - Plumbing Supplies40193 PW - Plumbing Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 35.86 17Page: Packet Page 92 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120100 7/15/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.41 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies40271 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 71.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.84 MCH - Supplies4038841 MCH - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.29 Fac Maint - Unit 26- Screws, Supplies5036422 Fac Maint - Unit 26- Screws, Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 33.21 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.15 Old PW - Art Supplies5036531 Old PW - Art Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 23.49 Fac Maint - Art Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.88 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.22 Library - Supplies5045429 Library - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.47 Old PW - Art Works Adhesive Supplies5255289 Old PW - Art Works Adhesive Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -21.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 -2.09 Water - Supplies5565649 18Page: Packet Page 93 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120100 7/15/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Water - Supplies 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 1.23 Museum - Supplies7036021 Museum - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 39.02 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.71 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Mud Mixer, Caddy,7045130 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Mud Mixer, Caddy, 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 28.05 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.66 Yost - Gray Seal, L-Flashing8035801 Yost - Gray Seal, L-Flashing 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.71 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.83 Old PW - Supplies8035910 Old PW - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 65.34 Fac Maint - Art work supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 123.34 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.92 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Supplies8039955 Fac Maint Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 27.93 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.65 Water - Repair Supplies8095351 Water - Repair Supplies 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 143.64 9.5% Sales Tax 19Page: Packet Page 94 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120100 7/15/2010 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.65 PW - Wood Supplies, Carpet Runner9037821 PW - Wood Supplies, Carpet Runner 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 14.47 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.37 Total :1,263.22 120101 7/15/2010 067171 HUSKY TRUCK CENTER 218994T Unit 95 - Brake parts, Rotor Kit, Disc Unit 95 - Brake parts, Rotor Kit, Disc 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 673.75 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 64.01 Unit 95 - Disc Pad, Rotor Assemblies218996T Unit 95 - Disc Pad, Rotor Assemblies 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 867.65 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 82.43 Total :1,687.84 120102 7/15/2010 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 21231 E8GC.SERVICES (MATERIAL) THRU 6/26/10 E8GC.Services (Material) thru 6/26/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 1,140.83 E8GC.Services (Material) thru 6/26/10 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,140.83 E8GC.Services (Material) thru 6/26/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 1,140.84 E8GC.SERVICES THRU 6/26/1021246 E8GC.Services thru 6/26/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 640.25 E4GA.SERVICES THRU 6/26/1021267 E4GA.Services thru 6/26/10 412.300.630.594.320.410.00 106.50 Total :4,169.25 20Page: Packet Page 95 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120103 7/15/2010 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 460591-1 Traffic - Paint & Gasket Remover Traffic - Paint & Gasket Remover 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 18.39 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.75 Total :20.14 120104 7/15/2010 070042 IKON 82501211 C/A 467070-1003748A4 Finance Copier Rental 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 405.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.310.514.230.450.00 38.48 Total :443.48 120105 7/15/2010 070042 IKON 82475771 COPIER LEASING Cannon Image Runner 5/24 - 6/22 001.000.250.514.300.450.00 972.77 Total :972.77 120106 7/15/2010 070042 IKON 82443750 Rent on reception copier. Rent on reception copier. 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 30.66 Rent on large copier from 7/1-7/31/2010.82501217 Rent on large copier from 7/1-7/31/2010. 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 827.00 Total :857.66 120107 7/15/2010 006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 5014474347 Meter charges for large copier June Meter charges for large copier June 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 59.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.558.800.310.00 5.61 Meter charges for Engineering color5014474348 Meter charges for Engineering color 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 945.38 9.5% Sales Tax 21Page: Packet Page 96 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120107 7/15/2010 (Continued)006841 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 001.000.620.558.800.450.00 89.81 Total :1,099.86 120108 7/15/2010 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS 517583 Fleet Shop Small Tools - Pressure Fleet Shop Small Tools - Pressure 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 389.73 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 37.02 Total :426.75 120109 7/15/2010 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS ED5012 INV#ED5012 ACCT#ED03 - EDMONDS PD DURACELL AA BATTERIES 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 71.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.220.310.00 6.83 Total :78.75 120110 7/15/2010 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 769149 Fleet Shop Supplies - Mini Lamps, Cable Fleet Shop Supplies - Mini Lamps, Cable 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 55.52 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 5.27 Total :60.79 120111 7/15/2010 015490 K & K CONCRETE PRODUCTS 34419 Water - Concrete Water - Concrete 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 129.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 12.26 Total :141.26 120112 7/15/2010 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 3407414 INV#3407414 - EDMONDS PD MULTI USE COPY PAPER 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 46.68 HANDLING FEE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.94 22Page: Packet Page 97 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120112 7/15/2010 (Continued)072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 4.43 Total :59.05 120113 7/15/2010 067552 KING CO FINANCE & BUSINESS 57217 BALLINGER PUPMP STATION COSTS BALLINGER PUPMP STATION COSTS 411.000.655.535.800.472.00 44,288.50 BALLILNGER PUMP STATION COSTS 411.000.655.535.800.510.00 115,445.61 Total :159,734.11 120114 7/15/2010 071779 KING SALMON MARINE INC 003246 Unit M16 - Parts Unit M16 - Parts 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 531.39 Repair Service 511.000.657.548.680.480.00 855.00 Total :1,386.39 120115 7/15/2010 069355 KLEINFELDER INC 648790 4695 C-311 ODOR CONTROL PROJECT 414.000.656.594.320.410.10 486.85 Total :486.85 120116 7/15/2010 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 362904-001 Self lock power tape for Jaime Hawkins. Self lock power tape for Jaime Hawkins. 001.000.620.532.200.490.00 15.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.620.532.200.490.00 1.52 Total :17.47 120117 7/15/2010 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 07082010-01 INV#07082010-01 EDMONDS PD 42 CAR WASHES @ $5.03 - 06/10 001.000.410.521.220.480.00 211.26 Total :211.26 120118 7/15/2010 068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY 7010-533 FUEL LINE ASSEMBLY 23Page: Packet Page 98 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120118 7/15/2010 (Continued)068711 LAWN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY FUEL LINE ASSEMBLY 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 5.42 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 14.08 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 1.85 Total :21.35 120119 7/15/2010 073324 LINDER, GREG LINDER0718 PARK CONCERT CITY PARK CONCERT 117.100.640.573.100.410.00 600.00 Total :600.00 120120 7/15/2010 018760 LUNDS OFFICE ESSENTIALS 104622 Copy paper - HR, CSD Copy paper - HR, CSD 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 12.99 Copy paper - HR, CSD 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 12.99 Office Supplies - HR 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 69.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.610.519.700.310.00 1.24 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.220.516.100.310.00 7.88 Total :105.08 120121 7/15/2010 019583 MANPOWER INC 20524141 Reception coverage on Friday, July 2, Reception coverage on Friday, July 2, 001.000.620.558.800.410.00 81.15 Total :81.15 120122 7/15/2010 061900 MARC 0420155-IN 00-0902224 HAND CLEANER 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 72.00 Freight 24Page: Packet Page 99 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120122 7/15/2010 (Continued)061900 MARC 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 8.65 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.23 7.66 Total :88.31 120123 7/15/2010 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 56 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.290.00 5,838.75 Total :5,838.75 120124 7/15/2010 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 59170870 123106800 PIPE FITTING 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 85.93 Freight 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 7.48 Total :93.41 120125 7/15/2010 063773 MICROFLEX 00019389 Q2-10 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM Q2-2010 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM 001.000.310.514.230.410.00 70.04 Total :70.04 120126 7/15/2010 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 09-1030-14 E8JB.SERVICES THRU 5/31/10 E8JB.Services thru 5/31/10 412.100.630.594.320.410.00 3,577.50 Total :3,577.50 120127 7/15/2010 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0275537-IN Storm - Storm Jackets Storm - Storm Jackets 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 180.60 Storm Bib Overalls 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 180.60 Freight 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 13.68 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.240.00 35.62 25Page: Packet Page 100 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :410.501201277/15/2010 064570 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 120128 7/15/2010 072700 NETWORK HARDWARE RESALE LLC 287763 CISCO 3560G ADD'L PORTS & FBR REDUNDCY CATALYST 3560 24 10/100/1000T + 4 SFP~310-00140 001.000.310.518.880.350.00 2,790.00 Total :2,790.00 120129 7/15/2010 068769 NORTHWEST CASTER 1078501 CASTERS CASTERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 149.92 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 14.24 Total :164.16 120130 7/15/2010 066628 NORTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO 042319 Fleet Shop Supplies - Hot Dog II 33 Gal Fleet Shop Supplies - Hot Dog II 33 Gal 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 337.15 8.9% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.311.00 30.01 Total :367.16 120131 7/15/2010 073152 NORTHWEST GEOGRAPHICS INC 212 PW (Storm, Engineering) GIS Analyst PW (Storm, Engineering) GIS Analyst 412.200.630.594.320.410.00 1,487.50 Water 411.000.654.534.800.410.00 773.50 Sewer 411.000.655.535.800.410.00 1,547.00 Total :3,808.00 120132 7/15/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 159862 INV#159862 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD GEL WRIST MOUSE PAD 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 14.29 PATROL MEMO BOOKS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 11.60 TAPE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 18.50 26Page: Packet Page 101 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120132 7/15/2010 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC YELLOW PADS 8.5X11.75 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 23.46 HEATSEAL INDEX CARDS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.110.310.00 1.36 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.60 Total :80.19 120133 7/15/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 157534 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 134.62 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.250.514.300.310.00 12.79 Total :147.41 120134 7/15/2010 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 141441 Sewer TV Truck - CD's, DVD's, Supplies Sewer TV Truck - CD's, DVD's, Supplies 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 63.51 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 6.03 Sewer TV Truck - CD/DVD Storage supplies165769 Sewer TV Truck - CD/DVD Storage supplies 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 31.87 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 3.03 Street - Full page labels for signs685179 Street - Full page labels for signs 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 160.74 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.310.00 15.28 Total :280.46 120135 7/15/2010 068908 OLSEN, STANLEY A 53 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 27Page: Packet Page 102 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120135 7/15/2010 (Continued)068908 OLSEN, STANLEY A LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.510.522.200.230.00 1,223.90 Total :1,223.90 120136 7/15/2010 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 044356 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST CHEMICALS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 576.10 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 54.73 YOST POOL SUPPLIES044477 YOST CHEMICALS 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 126.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 11.99 Total :769.02 120137 7/15/2010 068316 PACE ENGINEERS INC 46830 E9DA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/10 E9DA.Services thru 2/28/10 112.200.630.595.330.410.00 11,893.47 Total :11,893.47 120138 7/15/2010 066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION AV4234 B/W copy overage fee- 3498 over B/W copy overage fee- 3498 over 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 17.47 B/W copy overage fee- 3498 over 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 17.47 B/W copy overage fee- 3498 over 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 17.47 B/W copy overage fee- 3498 over 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 17.45 Color copy fee - 1349 copies 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 39.95 Color copy fee - 1349 copies 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 39.95 Color copy fee - 1349 copies 28Page: Packet Page 103 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120138 7/15/2010 (Continued)066339 PACIFIC OFFICE AUTOMATION 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 39.95 Color copy fee - 1349 copies 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 39.95 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.480.00 5.46 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.480.00 5.46 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.652.542.900.480.00 5.46 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.900.480.00 5.44 Total :251.48 120139 7/15/2010 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 100422 DUMP FEES DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.40 DUMP FEES100423 DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.40 DUMP FEES99353 DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 134.40 DUMP FEES99363 DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 158.40 DUMP FEE99381 DUMP FEES 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 168.00 DUMP FEE99389 DUMP FEE 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 168.00 DUMP FEES/MARINA BEACH99605 DUMP FEES/MARINA BEACH 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 323.00 29Page: Packet Page 104 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,220.601201397/15/2010 027060 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 120140 7/15/2010 066412 PARKS & RECREATION DAYCAMP CAMPCASH0713 DAYCAMP PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT DAYCAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.640.575.530.310.00 109.40 DAYCAMP MISC. 001.000.640.575.530.490.00 151.89 Total :261.29 120141 7/15/2010 008400 PETTY CASH - EPD 7-10 ADM PETTY CASH POLICE ADMIN PETTY CASH 7-10 DVD HEAD CLEANER - DETECTIVES 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 28.38 CERTIFIED LETTER - SHANNON TOW 001.000.410.521.100.420.00 5.54 COOKIES 4/27 POLICE FOUNDATION 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 3.99 INVITATIONS-VOLUNTEER BREAKFAST 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 7.65 VERNON CAKE; AWARD NIGHT CUPS 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 26.29 RANGE TARGET STAND MATERIALS 001.000.410.521.400.310.00 23.61 WIRE, HOOKS FOR ROTARY AWARD 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 5.48 SHUTTLE FOR BARD, COLLINS - NEW WORLD 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 30.00 SCSPCA BREAKFAST - COMPAAN, BARD 001.000.410.521.100.430.00 40.00 LUNCH WHILE TRAINING - BELLINGHAM - 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 6.50 PARKING DURING TRAINING - EVERETT - 001.000.410.521.400.430.00 5.00 PARKING FOR INTERVIEW @ KC JAIL - 001.000.410.521.210.430.00 5.00 LIGHT BULB FOR LAB 001.000.410.521.210.310.00 4.35 30Page: Packet Page 105 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120141 7/15/2010 (Continued)008400 PETTY CASH - EPD DAVE MILLER RETIREMENT CAKE 001.000.410.521.100.310.00 18.99 Total :210.78 120142 7/15/2010 071783 PIGSKIN UNIFORMS 1445 INV#1445 - EDMONDS PD - MCCLURE WINTER WGT JUMPSUITS 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 700.00 UNDER ARM VENTS 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 50.00 "POLICE K9" 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 25.00 NAME PATCH - MCCLURE 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 20.00 Freight 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 25.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.410.521.260.240.00 77.90 Total :897.90 120143 7/15/2010 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL 24 hour Alarm Monitoring-City Hall~ 001.000.651.519.920.420.00 37.85 Total :37.85 120144 7/15/2010 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ12533 FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP #12533 001.000.640.575.540.410.00 73.50 Total :73.50 120145 7/15/2010 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 001839 Storm - Street Sweepings Dump Fees Storm - Street Sweepings Dump Fees 411.000.652.542.320.490.00 2,791.40 Total :2,791.40 120146 7/15/2010 033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL 2259750 Water/Sewer - Fastrak 60 @ 50LB Water/Sewer - Fastrak 60 @ 50LB 31Page: Packet Page 106 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120146 7/15/2010 (Continued)033550 SALMON BAY SAND & GRAVEL 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 627.00 Water/Sewer - Fastrak 60 @ 50LB 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 627.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 59.57 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 59.56 Total :1,373.13 120147 7/15/2010 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 87593 Unit 94 - Mirror Unit 94 - Mirror 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 94.91 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 9.02 Total :103.93 120148 7/15/2010 036950 SIX ROBBLEES INC 14-218508 Fleet Shop Tools Fleet Shop Tools 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 148.85 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.350.00 14.14 Total :162.99 120149 7/15/2010 036955 SKY NURSERY 284789 ANNUALS, ETC. ANNUALS & PERENNIALS 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 20.82 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.810.310.00 1.98 Total :22.80 120150 7/15/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 130164298 2019-2991-6 23219 74 AVE W BALLINGER 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 29.28 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.471.61 1.76 32Page: Packet Page 107 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :31.041201507/15/2010 037375 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 120151 7/15/2010 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200594885 4 WAY LIGHT 224TH 76TH SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 74.69 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH W201187895 SIGNAL LIGHT 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.99 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH PL SW201501277 LIFT STATION #14 411.000.655.535.800.470.00 31.04 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 900 PUGET DR201690849 Traffic Signal 900 Puget Dr 111.000.653.542.640.470.00 31.04 TELEMETRY SYSTEM201790003 TELEMETRY SYSTEM 411.000.654.534.800.470.00 29.28 SCHOOL LIGHT 7801 212TH SW202191284 STREET LIGHT 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 31.04 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (100WATTS:2029 LITE)202576153 MUNICIPAL ST LIGHTS (100WATTS:2029 LITE) 111.000.653.542.630.470.00 27,615.50 Total :27,844.58 120152 7/15/2010 064351 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 2010-307 INV#2010-307 - EDMONDS PD 74.50 BOOKINGS FOR 06/10 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 6,705.00 544.50 HOUSING DAYS FOR 06/10 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 34,031.25 WORK RELEASE FEE FOR 06/10 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 84.00 WORK RELEASE FEE PD BY INMATES 001.000.410.523.600.510.00 -32.00 Total :40,788.25 33Page: Packet Page 108 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120153 7/15/2010 072291 SNO-KING COMMUNITY CHORALE SNOKING0713 TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT TOURISM PROMOTION AGREEMENT 123.000.640.573.100.410.00 600.00 Total :600.00 120154 7/15/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03587 WASTE DISPOSAL PARK MAINTENANCE - SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 001.000.640.576.800.470.00 670.50 Total :670.50 120155 7/15/2010 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 03584 RECYCLING RECYCLING 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 28.25 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.475.66 1.70 Total :29.95 120156 7/15/2010 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 29088 PS - Door Repair PS - Door Repair 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 712.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.480.00 67.64 Total :779.64 120157 7/15/2010 068010 STATE OF WASHINGTON AL37922 Overpayment of time loss for the period Overpayment of time loss for the period 111.000.653.543.700.110.00 775.46 Total :775.46 120158 7/15/2010 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING 212479 Sewer - Roundup ( 5 gal), Crossbow (2.5 Sewer - Roundup ( 5 gal), Crossbow (2.5 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 364.00 8.6% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.310.00 31.30 Total :395.30 120159 7/15/2010 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2235001 Traffic Crontrol - Elect Supplies 34Page: Packet Page 109 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120159 7/15/2010 (Continued)040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Traffic Crontrol - Elect Supplies 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 104.95 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 9.97 PS & PW - Elect Supplies2238830 PS & PW - Elect Supplies 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 20.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.91 Total :136.92 120160 7/15/2010 060801 SUBURBAN PROPANE 110389 Sewer - LS 10 & 12 - Bulk Tank Annual Sewer - LS 10 & 12 - Bulk Tank Annual 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 60.00 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.655.535.800.450.00 5.70 Total :65.70 120161 7/15/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10028025 100323 STEEL HEX CAP SCREWS/WASHERS 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 396.31 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.21 37.65 Total :433.96 120162 7/15/2010 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 10023000 Traffic Control - Supplies Traffic Control - Supplies 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 91.17 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.640.310.00 8.66 Total :99.83 120163 7/15/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1702714 INV#I01702714-07092010, CUST#126500-EPD UNCLAIMED PROPERTY AD 07/09/10 001.000.410.521.100.440.00 32.88 35Page: Packet Page 110 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :32.881201637/15/2010 009350 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 120164 7/15/2010 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 11699692 Senior Utilities Engineer, #10-22 ad Senior Utilities Engineer, #10-22 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 165.74 Total :165.74 120165 7/15/2010 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 11843419 PW Admin - 1 Yr Subscription ~ PW Admin - 1 Yr Subscription ~ 001.000.650.519.910.490.00 168.00 Total :168.00 120166 7/15/2010 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 286912 SUPPLIES INSIDE COVER PLASTIC N'S 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 32.88 Freight 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 7.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.83 Total :44.21 120167 7/15/2010 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 042483000 C/A 042483000 Senior Utilities Engineer, #10-22 ad 001.000.220.516.100.440.00 384.08 Total :384.08 120168 7/15/2010 071590 TOWEILL RICE TAYLOR LLC Edmonds-June 2010 Hearing Examiner Service for June 2010. Hearing Examiner Service for June 2010. 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 3,600.00 Copy/Postage services.Edmonds-June 2010EXP Copy/Postage services. 001.000.620.558.600.410.00 22.03 Total :3,622.03 120169 7/15/2010 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 41548 CIVIC SKATE PARK FENCE MATERIAL & LABOR TO INSTALL CIVIC SKATE 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 842.00 36Page: Packet Page 111 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120169 7/15/2010 (Continued)041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 79.99 Total :921.99 120170 7/15/2010 042750 TRIBUZIO, WALLACE 54 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.390.517.370.230.00 85.70 Total :85.70 120171 7/15/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8504484 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES COUPLINGS, TEES 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 106.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 10.07 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES8504498 CEMENT PVC, PRIMER PVC 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 22.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.640.576.800.310.00 2.18 Total :141.22 120172 7/15/2010 061192 UNITED PIPE & SUPPLY 8497692 Water - Non Inventory Supplies - Repair Water - Non Inventory Supplies - Repair 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 704.10 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 66.89 Water Meter Inventory -8510280 Water Meter Inventory - 411.000.654.534.800.342.00 4,545.90 Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.342.00 390.94 Total :5,707.83 120173 7/15/2010 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 168685 Water - Spade, Trench Shovel Water - Spade, Trench Shovel 37Page: Packet Page 112 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 120173 7/15/2010 (Continued)064423 USA BLUE BOOK 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 85.90 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 33.46 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.34 Roadway - Large Chain with Hooks173496 Roadway - Large Chain with Hooks 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 83.95 Freight 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 13.53 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.653.542.310.310.00 9.26 Water - 7/8" Shackle Utility Lock182226 Water - 7/8" Shackle Utility Lock 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 123.60 Freight 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 14.62 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.654.534.800.310.00 13.13 Total :388.79 120174 7/15/2010 064214 USSSA WASHINGTON STATE 294 TEAM REGISTRATIONS MIXED TEAM REGISTRATIONS/SUMMER - NEW 001.000.640.575.520.490.00 35.00 Total :35.00 120175 7/15/2010 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 425 771-5553 03 0210 1014522641 07 AUTO DIALER 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 95.53 03 0210 1079569413 10425 NW1-0060 BPS TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 41.47 03 0210 1099569419 02425NW1-0155 TELEMETRY 411.000.656.538.800.420.00 218.12 38Page: Packet Page 113 of 208 07/15/2010 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 12:34:11PM Page:vchlist Bank code :front Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :355.121201757/15/2010 011900 011900 VERIZON NORTHWEST 120176 7/15/2010 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I10009820 INV#I10009820 EDM301 BACKGROUND CHECKS 06/2010 001.000.000.237.100.000.00 173.25 Total :173.25 120177 7/15/2010 061472 WESTECH ENGINEERING 38891 EDM010 FILTER MEDIA 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 590.80 9.5% Sales Tax 411.000.656.538.800.310.31 56.13 Total :646.93 120178 7/15/2010 061286 WESTERN FLUID COMPONENTS P-38209-0 Unit 91 - Plugs, Cap Unit 91 - Plugs, Cap 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 106.44 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.657.548.680.310.00 10.11 Total :116.55 Bank total :499,864.00140 Vouchers for bank code :front 499,864.00Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report140 39Page: Packet Page 114 of 208 AM-3211 2.E. Claim for Damages Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Linda Hynd Submitted For:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages from Marie M. Rosemund ($10,000.00). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute entry. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative A Claim for Damages was submitted by: Marie M. Rosemund 5230 65th Street NE Marysville, WA 98270 ($10,000.00) Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Rosemund Claim for Damages Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 08:46 AM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 07/15/2010 08:37 AM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 115 of 208 Packet Page 116 of 208 Packet Page 117 of 208 Packet Page 118 of 208 AM-3221 2.F. Acceptance of Liquor Control Board List of Businesses (July) Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:Consent Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Acceptance of the list of businesses dated 07-09-10 due to renew liquor licenses with the Washington State Liquor Control Board. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff It is recommended that the City Council accept the list of businesses renewing their liquor licenses with the Washington State Liquor Control Board. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The Police Department reviewed the list of businesses and has no concerns with renewing the liquor licenses. The City Clerk's Office reviewed the list for current city business licenses, and also has no concerns. Per Edmonds City Code Chapter 4.20, the attached list of businesses is provided for the City Council's acceptance. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: July 2010 Liquor Control Board List Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 03:19 PM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 04:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 04:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 07/15/2010 03:07 PM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 119 of 208 Packet Page 120 of 208 AM-3206 2.G. Interlocal Agreement for the Smart Commuter Project Grant Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Megan Cruz Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement for the Smart Commuter Project Grant between Community Transit and the City of Edmonds. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Council authorize the Mayor to sign Interlocal Agreement for the Smart Commuter Project Grant between Communit Transit and the City of Edmonds. Previous Council Action None. Narrative In April 2010, the City of Edmonds applied for a Community Transit grant to provide incentives to City employees that participate in the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program. The main goal is to increase the number of employees that walk, bike, carpool, ride the train or bus to work. In May 2010, this grant for $2,600 was secured with a $650 local match. The grant provides incentives to reduce commute trips and the local match covers staff time to administer the CTR Program. In order to be eligible for incentives, employees must use one of the above mentioned alternative modes of transportation at least twice a week during any one month period beginning in July 2010 and ending in May 2011. Incentives will consist of startup incentives (provided during the first month of employee participation), a monthly raffle between all participants, prizes to the employees with the highest monthly participation, and awards to the two employees with the highest annual participation. The grant expires in May 2011, at which time the City will evaluate the overall efficiency of the program to see if it should be continued. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Interlocal Agreement Form Routing/Status Packet Page 121 of 208 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Robert English 07/15/2010 12:39 PM APRV 2 Public Works Phil Williams 07/16/2010 08:34 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 08:36 AM APRV 4 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/16/2010 09:49 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 09:50 AM APRV Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 07/12/2010 09:03 AM Final Approval Date: 07/16/2010 Packet Page 122 of 208 Packet Page 123 of 208 Packet Page 124 of 208 Packet Page 125 of 208 Packet Page 126 of 208 Packet Page 127 of 208 Packet Page 128 of 208 Packet Page 129 of 208 Packet Page 130 of 208 AM-3215 2.H. Proposed Ordinance to Increase the Stormwater Rates Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Robert English Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee:Finance Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of section 7.50.050 Rates and Charges, section A, relating to stormwater rates in order to increase the rates, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the Ordinance. Previous Council Action On July 6, 2010, a public hearing was held on the proposed stormwater rate increases as recommended in the 2010 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan. On June 9, 2010, the proposed stormwater rate increases were presented to the Finance Committee for review and discussion. Narrative On Juy 6, 2010, a public hearing was held on the proposed stormwater rate increases as recommended in the 2010 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the public hearing, Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance for approval to raise the stormwater rates as recommended in the financial analysis performed by FCS Group. The Ordinance will increase the stormwater rates by 8% for years 2010 (effective 8/1/10), 2011 and 2012. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Robert English 07/15/2010 12:12 PM APRV 2 Public Works Phil Williams 07/16/2010 07:55 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 08:36 AM APRV 4 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/16/2010 09:49 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 09:50 AM APRV Started On: 07/15/2010 10:58 Packet Page 131 of 208 Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 07/15/2010 10:58 AM Final Approval Date: 07/16/2010 Packet Page 132 of 208 {WSS803220.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 7/14/10 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.50.050 RATES AND CHARGES , SECTION A, RELATING TO STORMWATER RATES IN ORDER TO INCREASE THE RATES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, public hearings have been held before the Edmonds Planning Board and the Edmonds City Council regarding the City’s Storm and Surface Water Management Plan, and WHEREAS, the projected increased costs of operation of the system are in large part attributable to unfunded federal mandates and other requirements, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to increase the rates to be consistent with upcoming changes in the City’s Storm and Surface Water Management element of the Comprehensive Plan and in order to provide necessary staffing to comply with federal and state requirements, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Code Section 7.50.050 Rates and Charges, Section A, is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.50.050 Rates and charges. A. The following rates shall be charged on all buildings with respect to the following customers and/or service. Packet Page 133 of 208 {WSS803220.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 - CATEGORY EFFECTIVE DATE to 8/1/10 8/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 Single-family residential and multi-family residential Bi-monthly billing cycle $16.62 $17.94 $19.38 $20.94 Monthly billing cycle $8.31 $8.97 $9.69 $10.47 All other residential customers per ESU (monthly cycle) $8.31 $8.97 $9.69 $10.47 * * * Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 134 of 208 {WSS803220.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 3 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.50.050 RATES AND CHARGES, SECTION A, RELATING TO STORMWATER RATES IN ODER TO INCREASE THE RATES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 135 of 208 AM-3216 2.I. Proposed Ordinance to Increase the Water Rates Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Robert English Time:Consent Department:Engineering Type:Action Review Committee:Finance Committee Action:Recommend Review by Full Council Information Subject Title Proposed Ordinance amending the provisions of section 7.30.030 of the Edmonds City Code relating to water rates, sections A and B thereof in order to increase such rates, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve the Ordinance. Previous Council Action On July 6, 2010, a public hearing was held on the proposed water rate increases as recommended in the 2010 Water System Comprehensive Plan. On June 9, 2010, the proposed water rate increases were presented to the Finance Committee for review and discussion. Narrative On July 6, 2010, a public hearing was held on the proposed water rate increases as recommended in the 2010 Water System Comprehensive Plan. At the conclusion of the public hearing, Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance for approval to raise the water rates as recommended in the financial analysis performed by FCS Group. The Ordinance will increase the water rate by 7.5% for years 2010 (effective 8/1/10), 2011 and 2012. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Robert English 07/15/2010 04:01 PM APRV 2 Public Works Phil Williams 07/16/2010 08:33 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 08:36 AM APRV 4 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/16/2010 09:49 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 09:50 AM APRV Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 07/15/2010 11:32 AM Packet Page 136 of 208 Final Approval Date: 07/16/2010 Packet Page 137 of 208 {WSS803248.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 7/14/10 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.30.030 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO WATER RATES, SECTIONS A AND B THEREOF IN ORDER TO INCREASE SUCH RATES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Board and Edmonds City Council have held hearings regarding the City’s Water System Comprehensive Plan element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council has held separate public hearings regarding the City’s water rates, and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the report of its consultant recommending increases in water rates to address rising costs including but not limited to the cost of water provision under the City’s water contracts and replacing failing infrastucture, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to increase rates in a stepped fashion over the next three (3) years, finding that such increases are justified on cost-to-service basis, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Code Section 7.30.030 Water Rates - Meter installation charges, Section A and B are hereby amended to read as follows: Packet Page 138 of 208 {WSS803248.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- - 2 - 7.30.030 Water rates - Meter installation charges. A. The bimonthly rates of water supplied through meters shall be fixed at the following levels: Effective Dates Existing 8/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 1. Single-family $16.58 $17.82 $19.16 $20.60 residence (per unit) 2. Duplex, apartment, $14.60 $15.70 $16.87 $18.14 houses, condominiums and other multi-unit residences (per unit) 3. All other customers: METER 3/4” $20.05 $21.55 $23.17 $24.91 Existing 08/01/10 01/01/11 01/01/12 1” $40.82 $43.88 $47.17 $50.71 1.5” $75.49 $81.15 $87.24 $93.78 2” $115.09 $123.72 $133.00 $142.98 3” $248.27 $266.89 $286.91 $308.43 4” $351.68 $378.06 $406.41 $436.89 6” $697.15 $749.44 $805.64 $866.07 B. Variable Rate. In addition to the base rate set forth above, the customer shall be charged the following rate per 100 cubic feet of water consumed: Volume Rate Consumption (ccf) Effective Dates Existing 8/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 $1.72 $1.85 $1.99 $2.14 All water rate charges on water utility bills mailed prior to August 1, 2010 shall be based on rates as reflected in this section corresponding with said time period. The rate effective August 1, 2010 shall be applicable to all billings after that date. Thereafter, all water rate charges on water utility bills mailed on or after January 1 of each year shall be based on rates as reflected in this section corresponding with said time period. * * * Packet Page 139 of 208 {WSS803248.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- - 3 - Section 2. Effective Date APPROVED: . This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. MAYOR ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 140 of 208 {WSS803248.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- - 4 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 7.30.030 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE RELATING TO WATER RATES, SECTIONS A AND B THEREOF IN ORDER TO INCREASE SUCH RATES, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 141 of 208 AM-3223 2.J. Amend Ordinance #3685 and Ordinance #3733 Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Debi Humann Time:Consent Department:Human Resources Type: Review Committee: Committee Action:Approved for Consent Agenda Information Subject Title Proposed Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3685 and 3733 to establish the salary of the Mayor at $113,209.92 for any person elected or appointed to the position on or after the effective date of this ordinance. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action The Citizens' Commission on Compensation of Elected Officials presented their recommendation to the full Council on May 25, 2010. As an outcome of that presentation, Council asked that an ordinance repealing Ordinance #3733 be brought back to Council for review and possible approval. The newly revised Ordinance is attached for Council consideration. Narrative Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Ordinance Establishing Mayor Salary Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 05:58 PM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/16/2010 08:15 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/16/2010 08:36 AM APRV Form Started By: Debi Humann Started On: 07/15/2010 05:41 PM Final Approval Date: 07/16/2010 Packet Page 142 of 208 {WSS803404.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 - 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 7/15/10 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3685 AND 3733 TO ESTABLISH THE SALARY OF THE MAYOR AT $113,209.92 FOR ANY PERSON ELECTED OR APPOINTED TO THE POSITION ON OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3685 increased the salary of the Mayor effective July 1, 2008 and adopted an additional increase to be effective July 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 3733 delayed the implementation of the salary increase scheduled for July 1, 2009 until January 1, 2011 due to significant and unanticipated economic impacts which seriously impacted the budget of the City of Edmonds; and WHEREAS, such budgetary impacts and the current economic condition continue, now, therefore, the City Council deems it to be in the public interest to repeal the second salary increase scheduled for January 1, 2011 and to maintain a salary of $113,209.92 for any person appointed or elected to the position following the effective date of this ordinance, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The salary of any person appointed to or elected Mayor on or after the effective date of this ordinance shall be $113,209.92 per year. To the extent that any provision Packet Page 143 of 208 {WSS803404.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 - of Ordinance No. 3685 or 3733 is deemed to conflict with these provisions, such provisions shall be deemed repealed or amended. Section 2. Effective Date APPROVED: . This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. MAYOR ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 144 of 208 {WSS803404.DOC;1\00006.900000\ }- 3 - SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3685 AND 3733 TO ESTABLISH THE SALARY OF THE MAYOR AT $113,209.92 FOR ANY PERSON ELECTED OR APPOINTED TO THE POSITION ON OR AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Packet Page 145 of 208 AM-3219 3. Community Service Announcement Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:5 Minutes Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Community Service Announcement - Edmonds Film Festival International. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative An announcement will be made concerning the upcoming Edmonds Film Festival International. Fiscal Impact Attachments No file(s) attached. Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 02:01 PM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 04:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 04:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 07/15/2010 01:59 PM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 146 of 208 AM-3175 4. Proposed Change to City Manager-Council Form of Government Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Jana Spellman Submitted For:Councilman Plunkett Time:30 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Public hearing to seek public comment on a proposed change to a City Manager-Council form of government. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action During the June 15, 2010 discussion regarding a city manager form of government the following motion was made: COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE COUNCIL SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE JULY 20 AGENDA WITH POTENTIAL ACTION REGARDING A COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT. MOTION CARRIED (4-2) WITH COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON AND WILSON VOTING NO. Attachment 1: Minutes of June 15, 2010 Council Meeting. Narrative Born out of the turn-of-the-century reform movement, the council-manager system of local government started in Staunton, Virginia in 1908. Since its establishment, the council-manager form has become the most popular form of government in the United States. For more than 85 years, council-manager governments have responded to the changing needs of citizens and their communities. Currently, 3,625 cities operate under this form. They vary greatly in size and characteristics, including independent cities, center cities, suburbs, and counties. More than 75.5 million people are within this form of government. Out of 199 cities with greater than 100,000 citizens, 112 use this form of government. Some examples are Phoenix, San Diego, Dallas, Cincinnati, San Antonio, Kansas City, Missouri, and Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Edmonds will still have a mayor who would be elected by the council from among the council members. The mayor would continue to preside at council meetings, serve as a spokesperson for the community, facilitate communication and understanding between elected and appointed Packet Page 147 of 208 the community, facilitate communication and understanding between elected and appointed officials, assist the council in setting goals, advocate policy and serve as a promoter and defender of the community. However, the day-to-day running of the City of Edmonds would be administered by a professional manager. There would be a transition. The manager is hired to serve the council and the community and to bring to local government the benefits of training and experience in administering local government projects and programs on behalf of the governing body. The manager prepares a budget for the council’s consideration; recruits, hires, and supervises the staff; serves as the council chief adviser; and carries out the council’s policies. Council members and citizens count on the manager to provide complete and objective information, pros and cons of alternatives, and long-term consequences. Most of the business of a city is just that, business. Whether it is keeping traffic signals operating, police cars maintained, employees productive or just paying the bills on time. It is the nuts and bolts of city operation that is done with a neutral city manager professional. Council members are elected to be leaders to focus on policy issues that are responsive to citizens’ needs and wishes. This leaves a city manager, appointed by council, free to carry out and manage policy. The council focuses on the community’s goals, major projects, and such long-term considerations as community public safety, land use, capital improvement plans, financing, and strategic planning. There is a professionally established code of ethics for city managers. The Code specifies 12 ethical principles of personal and professional conduct, including dedication to the cause of good government. In 1914, a group of appointed managers formed a professional association, eventually known as the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), to share their expertise and experiences in local government management. Since that time, ICMA has been the professional organization for appointed chief management executives in local government. The purposes of ICMA are to enhance the quality of local government through professional management and to support and assist professional local government administrators internationally. To that end, the Association provides technical assistance and publications to better assure that we have the best administrator to run our city. Who do you really think is going to be more accountable to you and to your neighbor? ICMA members believe in the effectiveness of representative democracy and the value of government services provided equitably to citizens within a community. ICMA members also are committed to standards of honesty and integrity more vigorous than those required by the law. Contact ICMA for a copy of the Code of Ethics. Council would need to vote to put the issue on the ballot. If enacted by the people of Edmonds a Council-manager form of government would be immediately upon certification of the election. Attachment 2: Michael Plunkett editorial Municipal Research Center Comparing/Contrasting Municipal Research Center Forms of Government Overview Municipal Research Center Process for Reorganization Revised Code of Washington Title 35 Fiscal Impact Packet Page 148 of 208 Attachments Link: Attach 1: June 15 2010 Council Minutes Link: Attach 2: Plunkett -City Manager Docs Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 09:37 AM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 09:38 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 11:00 AM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 06/29/2010 06:09 AM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 149 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 15, 2010 Page 14 Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Anacortes’ theme for murals. She questioned the requirement for a separate permit for a related group of murals when the permit was intended to cover staff time for the permit review. Planning Manager Rob Chave explained there were two processes, the building permit process and design review. Currently, each mural is a different sign and under the Building Code, each requires a separate building permit. There is more latitude at design review to combine the review of similar murals into one design review. A future consideration is whether to waive the fee for individual sign permits and the design review fee. He estimated the sign permit and design review fee were approximately $120. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained staff recommended waiving the fee be reviewed by the Finance Committee as fees are adopted by the Council by resolution annually during the budget review process and are not included in the ECDC. He recommended an alternate fee structure rather than a waiver. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT, TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 6, 2010. Councilmember Wilson asked whether it would be appropriate to have a different design review process such as the Arts Commission provide final approval. Mr. Chave explained the Council had two choices, 1) treat murals as signs where content was not regulated, or 2) treat murals as public art which is reviewed by the Arts Commission. Consideration was given to combining those processes but it was not feasible because the sign code does not allow regulation based on content. Councilmember Wilson asked whether private art on a private business could be subject to a non-sign ordinance process that was similar to the public art process. Mr. Snyder responded that would be possible via a zone approach and establishing criteria. The challenge is to create objective criterion that are applicable. Councilmember Wilson preferred a design theme and a review process that included the Art Commission. If the mural was clearly art and not signage, he wanted to ensure the art met basic criteria. Mr. Snyder suggested the arts community, Arts Commission and ADB develop the criteria. Mr. Chave explained one of the issues with such a process was time and difficulty. Review by the Arts Commission was potentially a longer, more elaborate process although it would provide more control over content. Councilmember Peterson advised that option was discussed by the Community Services/Development Services Committee; Councilmember Orvis and his direction to staff was the option in the proposed ordinance. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12. COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Councilmember Plunkett explained the intent of this agenda item was to allow the Council to determine whether they wanted to schedule a public hearing and potentially a vote regarding changing from a strong Mayor to Council-Manager form of government. He requested staff put the information in the Council packet from Municipal Research Services Center (MRSC) on the City’s website regarding different forms of government, the differences between a strong Mayor and Council-Manager form of government and the RCWs regarding the Council-Manager form of government. He explained the Council-Manager form of government would become effective upon certification of the election. The interim Mayor selected by the Council would serve until certification of the election or slightly beyond if a City Manager had not yet been selected. Upon certification of the election, the Mayor becomes the eighth member of the Council for the remainder of his/her term. He was unclear whether an interim Mayor would assume that role, noting that was an issue City Attorney Scott Snyder would research. Packet Page 150 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 15, 2010 Page 15 Councilmember Plunkett suggested if the Council agreed to place a Council-Manager form of government on the ballot, the interim Mayor begin the process of advertising and hiring a City Manager subject to a successful vote. If the election to change to a Council-Manager form of government were successful, the Council would select a Councilmember to serve as a ceremonial Mayor and the City Manager would run the City. Council President Bernheim advised if the intent was to place a Council-Manager form of government on the November ballot, the pro/con statements, ballot title, etc. must be submitted to the Auditor by August 10. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the voters pamphlet statements must be submitted by August 10 or did only the notice to place an item on the ballot need to be filed by August 10. Mr. Snyder advised the ballot title, which he drafts and the Council adopts by ordinance, must be submitted by August 10. City Clerk Sandy Chase answered the deadline to submit the voters’ pamphlet pros/con statement, etc. was near the August 10 deadline. She offered to provide exact dates. Councilmember Plunkett observed that scheduling a public hearing and vote at the second meeting in July would provide sufficient time to submit information to the Auditor by August 10. Mr. Snyder explained the Council could also place this issue on the ballot at a special election. Councilmember Plunkett asked the cost of a February 2011 levy and vote regarding a Council-Manager form of government. Ms. Chase answered placing a ballot proposition on the November ballot would cost approximately $20,000 due to the number of jurisdictions participating in the election. It would be considerably more to place a ballot proposition on the February 2011 ballot, at least $80,000 to $100,000. Councilmember Plunkett preferred to place the vote regarding a Council-Manager form of government on the November ballot. He suggested holding a public hearing on July 20 and placing it on the November 2010 ballot. COUNCILMEMBER PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE COUNCIL SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE JULY 20 AGENDA WITH POTENTIAL ACTION REGARDING A COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether the hybrid option suggested by Maggie Fimia, a part-time elected Mayor and a business manager, had been considered. Councilmember Plunkett responded it had not been researched but that structure could be put in place at any time. He commented the Council could cut the Mayor’s pay at any time, make it a part-time position and create the position of an overall city administrator. Mayor Haakenson disagreed the Council had the discretion to cut the Mayor’s pay. Mr. Snyder explained the Council could establish a new salary for the individual elected at the next election. Under an elected Mayor, the city administrator’s powers would be determined by the Mayor. He referred to Gig Harbor as an example of a city that had a city administrator for the past 20 years. He summarized a city administrator would do only what the Mayor allowed/directed him/her to do. Mr. Snyder explained under a Council-Manager form of government, the City Manager had very definite powers, most of those afforded the Mayor and in many instances stronger than an elected Mayor. Unlike the Mayor-Council form of government, Councilmembers can forfeit their office for attempting to interfere with the administrative functions of a City Manager. If the Council did not like how the administration was running, the Council could terminate the City Manager. Councilmember Plunkett asked whether the salary of an interim Mayor could be cut. Mr. Snyder answered any increases provided since the Mayor’s term began could be repealed but the salary could not be reduced below that amount. Packet Page 151 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 15, 2010 Page 16 Councilmember Buckshnis cited research that Barbara Tipton and she have conducted and offered to meet with or provide that information with any member of the public. She supported pursuing a Council- Manager form of government, noting there were numerous cities that used the Council-Manager form of government as well as articles regarding the Council-Manager form of government. Councilmember Peterson commented although a public discussion regarding this issue was appropriate, he would not support the motion to avoid the perception that he endorsed the concept of a Council- Manager form of government. He cited the important dynamic between elected officials and the public, noting that although a strong Mayor elected by and directly responsible to the public and Council was not a perfect framework, it was a better form of government. As Mr. Fleck indicated, Edmonds has been governed by a Council-Mayor form of government for the past 100 years and direct access to their elected officials has served the City and citizens well. He preferred a legislative body and an executive body that were directly responsive to the public. Councilmember Wilson explained he taught political science for a number of years at the community college and as an adjunct at a university and his current job was a public policy consultant. He recognized the interest in learning about a City Manager, noting there was little cohesive information. When he taught state and local government courses or American politics courses, he started at the beginning with the Declaration of Independence. The center of American political government is the right of evolution and change. He referred to language in the Declaration stating there should be good reason for changing the government. Councilmember Wilson relayed the following questions to be asked before changing the governance structure 1. Why is the current system failing us? He noted there has not been a case made regarding why the current form of government was a failure. 2. What is so wrong with our current system that needs changing? Although some may not like Councilmembers or the Mayor, that is a personality issue, not a systemic issue. 3. What system is better for the City? It depends on the community. 4. What are the key determinants whether the City should have a strong Mayor or Council-Manager form of government? a. An engaged electorate versus low level engagement – in communities with an engaged electorate where there is an active, opinionated City Council, a strong Mayor is appropriate. In communities with low level engagement, there are typically poor candidates for office and a Council-Manger form of government is more appropriate. b. Political stability of the community – in communities with a stable Council, a Council- Manager form of government is appropriate. In communities with an unstable Council, the new Council majority often fires the City Manager and hires another. In Edmonds, there is an engaged electorate. He provided a comparison of the number of registered voters to the population, voting percentage and voting population to overall population in Edmonds, Everett, Mill Creek and Lake Stevens, noting Edmonds has a higher voting population to overall population than any other city in the State. In accordance with the above determinants, this indicates Edmonds would not be a good fit for a Council-Manager form of government. With regard to the second determinant, political stability, he pointed out after the new Councilmember was appointed, six Councilmembers would be in their first term, two were recent appointees, and there had been a recent shift in the Council majority as well as an extremely anxious time nationally. He summarized this indicated a general sense of political instability in Edmonds. His research regarding the number of Councilmembers Edmonds has had since 2002 compared with Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace revealed Edmonds has had 16, Lynnwood 11 and Mountlake Terrace 13. He summarized Packet Page 152 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes June 15, 2010 Page 17 Edmonds was very politically unstable which points to the importance of a strong Mayor form of government. Councilmember Wilson referred to statements made in support of changing to a Council-Manager form of government: 1. The Council-Manager form of government better assures that ordinary citizens can shape and influence policy. This statement is not accurate; diminishing the total number of elected officials directly responsible/accountable to the voters diminished the voice of the citizenry. A professional staff person is typically not as accountable/responsive to the electorate as an elected official. 2. If the Manager is not responsive to Council policy, the Manager can be terminated. In that sense a Manager’s responsiveness and performance is tested daily. Councilmember Wilson commented that was a cause of political instability. In an active Council where the majority changed often, staff would be tested daily and the Manager may be removed at any time. For example Shoreline removed their City Manager recently and Mountlake Terrace has removed several City Managers, both are cities with some political instability. 3. Now is the perfect time to put this issue before the voters. This depended on the City’s highest priorities. If the City’s highest priority was the revenue situation, levy and stabilizing the City’s finances, now was not the best time. He anticipated if a levy and Council-Manager form of government were placed on the same ballot, a levy was less likely to pass. 4. A City Manager form of government is better as the City strives to reduce expenses. This is not accurate. City Managers are paid more than staff and the Mayor; they often also have very lucrative benefit packages including a severance package. He pointed out when the Development Director position is filled at a cost of $160,000/year, a City Manager must be paid more than that position. Mayor Haakenson is currently paid $113,000/year. If expenses are a concern, a Council- Manager form of government would not save money. 5. Edmonds is one of the few cities in the surrounding area with a Mayor-Council form of government. This is not accurate, several cities in the area have strong Mayor form of government including Lynnwood, Mukilteo, Lake Forest Park, Everett, Marysville, Monroe, Seattle and Woodway; cities with a Council-Manager form of government include Mountlake Terrace, Mill Creek, Shoreline, Brier and Bothell. Councilmember Wilson summarized no case had been made from a social science perspective that a Council-Manager form of government was better. In the case of Edmonds, the key determinants in an objective analysis do not support a Council-Manager form of government. The key determinants of an engaged electorate and political instability support a strong Mayor. The arguments in favor of a City Manager are not accurate and there has been no proof that the current form of government was ineffective. MOTION CARRIED (4-2) COUNCILMEMBERS WILSON AND PETERSON VOTING NO. 13. REQUEST FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUBMITTAL DATE EXCEPTION. For Councilmember Plunkett, City Attorney Scott Snyder explained this was a legislative matter. The Council needed to find good cause. Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the deadline for submitting a Comprehensive Plan amendment is December 31 of the previous year. The code allows the Council to waive the deadline for good cause; the burden of proof is on the applicant to convince the Council there is good cause. Councilmember Peterson explained staff presented this request to the Community Services/Development Services Committee. The issue before the Council is whether to allow an exception in the submittal date; Packet Page 153 of 208 Packet Page 154 of 208 Packet Page 155 of 208 Packet Page 156 of 208 Packet Page 157 of 208 Packet Page 158 of 208 Packet Page 159 of 208 Packet Page 160 of 208 Packet Page 161 of 208 Packet Page 162 of 208 Packet Page 163 of 208 Packet Page 164 of 208 Packet Page 165 of 208 Packet Page 166 of 208 AM-3213 5. Prohibiting Certain uses of Polystyrene and Non-recyclable Materials Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Jana Spellman Submitted For:Councilmember Steve Bernheim Time:45 Minutes Department:City Council Type:Information Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Public hearing on adoption of an Ordinance prohibiting certain uses of Polystyrene and non-recyclable materials as disposable food packaging and requiring instead the use of recyclable or compostable materials. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Provide direction for next steps toward adopting a final ordinance. Previous Council Action The City Council previously discussed this issue at the February 5 and May 18, 2010 Council Meetings and the March 9, 2010 Public Safety Committee Meeting. (minutes attached). Attachment 8: 2/5/2010 Council Retreat Minutes Attachment 9: 3/9/2010 Public Safety Committee Minutes Attachment 10: 5/18/2010 Council Minutes Narrative Attached is a draft ordinance prohibiting food businesses from selling food in noncompostable packaging, requiring compostable or recyclable carryout food packaging, and requiring compliance by City departments and tenants. Attachment 1, Section 6.90.020A, B, C; 6.90.030. The proposed ordinance would not affect bulk sales of Styrofoam food containers, Section 6.90.020D, or prepackaged foods. Section 6.90.020E. Food services businesses would be required to offer on-site waste recycling service for waste disposal, if feasible. Section 6.90.040. Violations are infractions. Section 6.90.050. The proposed effective date is March 2011, but could be later, and waivers and extensions are available; an effective date of March 2012 is proposed for hot food and meat and fish containers. Section 6.90.060. It is patterned after similar ordinances recently enacted in Issaquah. Attachment 2. Notes from a public hearing in Issaquah on the subject are available. Attachment 3. A summary of the Issaquah Council action is Attachment 4. A local editorial written after adoption of the ban is Attachment 5. “Facts” and Q&A concerning polystyrene from King County are attachments 6 and 7. Packet Page 167 of 208 Examples of related public information materials are in attachment 11. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 1 draft packaging limits Link: 2 City of Issaquah - Food Service Packaging Link: 3 Summary of Issaquah styrofoam meetings Link: 4 City Council votes to ban Styrofoam food packaging next year _ The Issaquah Link: 5 Press Editorial _ The Issaquah Press - News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah Link: 6 polystyrene_facts Link: 7 Excerpts from Seattle Q & A. Link: Attach 8: Feb 5 2010 Council Retreat Min Link: Attach 9: March 9, 2010 CM Link: Attach 10: May 18 2010 CM Link: Attach 11: Information Materials Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Planning Department Rob Chave 07/15/2010 12:28 PM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 01:49 PM APRV 3 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 04:49 PM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 04:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 07/15/2010 09:26 AM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 168 of 208 ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 6.90 FOOD PACKAGING IN THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN USES OF POLYSTYRENE AND NON- RECYCLABLE FOR DISPOSABLE FOOD PACKAGING AND TO REQUIRE INSTEAD THE USE OF RECYCLABLE OR COMPOSTABLE FOOD PACKAGING; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds (the “City”) has a duty to protect the natural environment, the economy and the health of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature in RCW 70.95.010(8)(a) established waste reduction as the first priority for the collection, handling, and management of solid waste; and WHEREAS, in addition to waste reduction, the Washington State Legislature in RCW 70.95.010(8) also identified the following as priorities: recycling, avoiding excessive and nonrecyclable packaging of products, education so that people are informed of the need to reduce, source separate, and recycle solid waste, and government entities setting an example by implementing aggressive waste reduction and recycling programs at their workplaces and by purchasing products that are made from recycled materials and are recyclable; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature in RCW 70.95.010(4) found that it is "necessary to change manufacturing and purchasing practices and waste generation behaviors to reduce the amount of waste that becomes a governmental responsibility"; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature in RCW 70.95.010(6)(c) found that it is the responsibility of city governments "to assume primary responsibility for solid waste management and to develop and implement aggressive and effective waste reduction and source {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 1 - Packet Page 169 of 208 separation strategies"; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council has continuously indentified sustainability as an important goal for the City; and WHEREAS, the use of polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non-compostable food packaging and service ware serve a limited purpose that is disproportionately detrimental to the welfare of the environment; and WHEREAS, although polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non-compostable food packaging and service ware are often used and disposed of in minutes or days, they take thousands of years to decompose, and lead to devastating effects such as pollution and harm to marine life, wildlife, and public health; and WHEREAS, there is no meaningful method of recycling polystyrene-based food packaging and service ware, however, there are alternative recyclable and compostable products that can serve the same purpose as polystyrene-based food packaging; and WHEREAS, polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non-compostable food packaging and service ware represent an unnecessary use of a nonrenewable resource, especially when recyclable and compostable products represent a sustainable alternative; and WHEREAS, recyclable and compostable food packaging and service ware are considerably less damaging to the environment than polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non-compostable food packaging and service ware; and WHEREAS, replacing the use of polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non- compostable food packaging and service ware with those that are recyclable and compostable is recognized as a sustainable option to protect the environment and to conserve resources; and {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 - Packet Page 170 of 208 WHEREAS, recyclable and compostable food packaging and service ware are readily available for use by local businesses; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the present economic difficulties faced by local businesses in making a transition to recyclable or compostable food packaging and service ware, and finds that an extended timeline for implementation of this Chapter is in the best interest of assisting with local efforts at financial recovery; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Edmonds City Council to reduce the negative impacts noted above through the implementation of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council finds that reduction in use of polystyrene-based and non-recyclable or non-compostable food packaging and service ware is in the best interest of public health, safety, and welfare, for the citizens of Edmonds and the environment; and WHEREAS, the Act below is in accordance with the following goals of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan: Community Sustainability Element Climate Change Goal E, Community Health Goal E, and Environmental Quality Goal A; and the Utilities Element Goal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new Chapter 6.90 entitled Food Packaging is hereby added to the ECC to read as follows: Chapter 6.90 6.90.010 Definitions. 6.90.020 Prohibition on use of polystyrene, nonrecyclable, and noncompostable disposable food service packaging and disposable food service ware. {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 3 - Packet Page 171 of 208 6.90.030 Recyclable or compostable disposable food service packaging and disposable food service ware required. 6.90.040 Requirement to enroll in a commercial food waste recycling service or keep containers for recyclable or compostable food packaging on premises for consumer use. 6.90.050 Enforcement and penalties. 6.90.060 Effective dates of this chapter. 6.90.070 Severability. 6.90.080 No conflict with federal or state law. 6.90.010 Definitions. A. “Mayor” means the Mayor of the City of Edmonds or designee. B. “City facility” means any building, structure, or vehicle owned or operated by the City of Edmonds. C. “Compostable” means made solely of organic substances where all the materials in the product or package will break down into, or otherwise become part of, usable compost (e.g., soil- conditioning material, mulch) in a safe and timely manner. D. “Disposable food service packaging” means all containers, clamshells, bowls, plates, trays, cartons, cups, lids, straws, utensils, napkins, and other items that are designed for use with food either on or off the food service business premises, including but not limited to packages for takeout foods and/or leftovers from food prepared by food service businesses. The term “disposable food service packaging” does not include items composed entirely of aluminum or polystyrene foam coolers and ice chests that are intended for reuse. E. “Disposable food service ware” means nonrecyclable or noncompostable: containers, plates, “clamshells,” trays, cups, and utensils that are made of plastic or plastic-coated paper and other nonrecyclable or noncompostable materials, and intended only for limited use (including so-called “biodegradable” products where any portion is not compostable). F. “Food” means food or beverages, which are served, packaged, cooked or uncooked, chopped, sliced, mixed, brewed, frozen, squeezed, or otherwise prepared within the City of Edmonds for any persons, such as customers or consumers. {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 4 - Packet Page 172 of 208 G. “Food service business” means any restaurant, retail food seller, coffee shop, grocery store, vending truck or cart, business or institutional cafeteria, sales outlet, or other business, entity, or person selling or providing food to a consumer, whether the food is consumed on or off the premises, that is located or operating within the City of Edmonds, whether on a permanent or temporary basis. “Food service business” also includes any person who is the owner, manager, president or director of such business. H. “Person” means any individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, corporation, partnership, business, or association, including a government entity. I. “Polystyrene” means blown polystyrene and expanded and/or extruded foams (sometimes referred to as “Styrofoam,” a Dow Chemical Co. trademarked form of polystyrene foam insulation) which are thermoplastic petrochemical materials utilizing a styrene monomer and processed by any number of techniques, including, but not limited to, fusion of polymer spheres (expandable bead polystyrene), injection molding, foam molding, and extrusion-blow molding (extruded foam polystyrene). J. “Recyclable” means made solely of materials that are capable of being separated from a waste stream by a food service business and made available for collection and delivery to a processor for reuse or remanufacture into the same or other products. 6.90.020 Prohibition on use of polystyrene, nonrecyclable, and noncompostable disposable food service packaging and disposable food service ware. A. Upon the effective date for mandatory compliance with this chapter set forth in ECC 6.90.060, food service businesses shall be prohibited from selling or providing, in connection with food service, polystyrene, nonrecyclable, or noncompostable food service packaging or disposable food service ware, except as hereinafter provided in subsections D and E of this section. B. Upon the effective date for mandatory compliance with this chapter set forth in ECC 6.90.060, City departments shall not purchase, acquire, or use polystyrene, nonrecyclable, or noncompostable disposable food service packaging or disposable food service ware in City facilities. {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 5 - Packet Page 173 of 208 C. Upon the effective date for mandatory compliance with this chapter set forth in ECC 6.90.060, any renter or lessee of a City- owned facility or City-owned property shall not use polystyrene, non-recyclable, or noncompostable disposable food service packaging or disposable food service ware on the premises of the rented or leased facility or property. D. While businesses are encouraged to refrain from the sale of polystyrene, nonrecyclable, or noncompostable disposable food service packaging or disposable food service ware, nothing in this chapter shall prohibit businesses or individuals from engaging in the direct sale, purchase, or possession of such items in prepackaged multiple quantities from a retail or wholesale merchant. E. Prepackaged soups and other foods that food service businesses sell or otherwise provide to their customers in polystyrene, nonrecyclable, or noncompostable disposable food service packaging or disposable food service ware that have been filled and sealed prior to receipt by the food service business shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter. 6.90.030 Recyclable or compostable disposable food service packaging and disposable food service ware required. All food service businesses and City departments that are prohibited under this chapter from using or providing polystyrene, nonrecyclable or noncompostable food service packaging or disposable food service ware shall use a recyclable or compostable product. 6.90.040 Requirement to enroll in a commercial food waste recycling service or keep containers for recyclable or compostable food packaging on premises for consumer use. A. All food service businesses are required to utilize either a commercial food waste recycling service for compostable products and recyclable materials (such as the City’s solid waste management program) or, at a minimum, to provide at least 1 container for recycling or composting on site for consumers to dispose of food packaging that conforms to the requirements of this chapter. {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 6 - Packet Page 174 of 208 B. All food service businesses are prohibited from emptying or disposing of items in recycling or compost containers into trash bins, containers, or dumpsters not intended for recycling or compost. C. Existing food service businesses that do not have adequate storage space for compliance with either indoor or outdoor containers for recycling and/or composting may be exempt from the requirements of subsection A of this section if so determined by the Mayor or designee upon written request for an exemption. The Mayor or designee, in cases where space constraints are determined to exist, may require the evaluation of the feasibility of shared recycling or composting containers by contiguous businesses and/or structures. 6.90.050 Enforcement and penalties. A. Any person who violates the provisions of this chapter shall be cited and liable for a civil infraction; provided, however, that a written warning shall instead be issued to any person determined to be violating this chapter when such violation is the first instance of noncompliance known to the Mayor or designee. If, after issuing a written warning, the Mayor or designee becomes aware of subsequent noncompliance, he shall apply for or impose the sanctions described in this section. B. Any person who receives a citation for a violation of this chapter shall respond within 15 days from the date that notice of the infraction is signed and served upon the violator by the City Code Enforcement Officer. The issuance of an infraction by the City for a violation represents a determination that an infraction has been committed. A committed finding will be final if the violator does not respond as stated in this subsection. C. Any person who receives a citation for a violation of this chapter may respond either by paying the fine amount to the City as established by this section, or requesting a hearing with the Edmonds Municipal Court. D. If the infraction is found committed, either due to no response by the person cited, or a judicial determination that a violation has occurred by a preponderance of the evidence, then a person shall be punished with a fine of $150.00 for a first violation, and $300.00 for each subsequent violation committed within a calendar year. The existence of a prior written warning by the {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 7 - Packet Page 175 of 208 Mayor or designee shall not be considered a first violation for purposes of this section. 6.90.060 Effective dates of this chapter. A. All provisions of this chapter, except for ECC 6.90.020 through ECC 6.90.050, shall be effective upon adoption of this chapter. B. The provisions of ECC 6.90.020 through ECC 6.90.050 will be effective March 1, 2011, except as hereinafter provided for in subsections C through E of this section. C. A food service business may request a waiver from any part or all of the requirements in this chapter by filing a written request with the Mayor or designee. The food service business seeking the waiver must show that the application of this chapter would create an undue hardship or practical difficulty based on the factors set forth in subsection E of this section. The Mayor or designee may waive any specific requirement of this chapter for a period of time extending no later than March 1, 2012. The Mayor or designee’s decision to grant or deny a waiver, in whole or in part, shall be mailed to the applicant in writing, with a statement of the permitted waiver length, and shall be a final nonappealable decision. D. Prior to March 1, 2012, only the following items are exempt from the requirements of ECC 6.90.020 through ECC 6.90.050: containers and lids specifically designed and used for hot liquid-based food and beverages, utensils (knives, forks and spoons), and the sale of raw meat or raw seafood in any container by any food service business. Prior to March 1, 2012, public educational institutions are also exempt from the requirements of ECC 6.90.020 through ECC 6.90.050. E. The following factors should be considered by the Mayor or designee in granting or denying a waiver, in whole or in part, from the requirements of this chapter, as described in subsection C of this section: (1) the food service business seeking a waiver lacks the financial or other means to be in compliance with this chapter within a reasonable period of time; (2) the food service business seeking the waiver demonstrates, through due diligence, that particular products conforming to the requirements of this chapter are unavailable, pose recognized safety hazards, or will result in substantial financial harm; (3) the food service business seeking the waiver has maintained a business in Edmonds for less than one year. The factors listed herein are significant, but not intended to {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 8 - Packet Page 176 of 208 be the only considerations for the grant or denial of a waiver. The Mayor or designee should make a decision concerning a request for waiver based on the preference of assisting a food service business to achieve compliance with this chapter while balancing the economic vitality of the business and striving to reduce any financially detrimental impacts on the applicant. F. On March 1, 2012, all waivers and exemptions from the requirements of this chapter will terminate and become invalid; and all provisions of this chapter will be subject to implementation and enforcement. 6.90.070 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. 6.90.080 No conflict with federal or state law. Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or state law. Section 2. This ordinance or a summary thereof consisting of the title shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after publication. APPROVED: MAYOR GARY HAAKENSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 9 - Packet Page 177 of 208 {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 10 - BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Page 178 of 208 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________ of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the ____ day of ___________, 2010, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 6.90 FOOD PACKAGING IN THE EDMONDS CITY CODE TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN USES OF POLYSTYRENE AND NON- RECYCLABLE FOR DISPOSABLE FOOD PACKAGING AND TO REQUIRE INSTEAD THE USE OF RECYCLABLE OR COMPOSTABLE FOOD PACKAGING; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this _____ day of ________________,2010. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {BFP791064.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 11 - Packet Page 179 of 208 City of Issaquah - Food Service Packaging http://www.ci.issaquah.wa.us/Page.asp?NavID=2215[2/26/2010 2:57:19 PM] Back to Resource Conservation Office For the Home - Sustainable Living For The Business - Sustainable Business Food Service Packaging Garbage, Recycling, Yard & Food Waste Collection Hazardous Waste Landscape and Garden Salmon Friendly Commuting Sustainable Building Water Conservation Water Quality Pickering Garden Protecting Issaquah's Waterways Sustainable City Indicators Volunteer Opportunities zHome Bids/RFPs Staff Directory P.O. Box 1307 City Hall NW, 1775 - 12th Ave NW Issaquah, WA 98027 Phone: (425) 837-3400 Email: rco@ci.issaquah... [sitemap] [advanced search] CALENDAR OF: MEETINGS & EVENTS Today is: February 26, 2010 DAY WEEK MONTH Printer friendly version / Resource Conservation Office / For The Business - Sustainable Business / Food Service Packaging Food Service Packaging Requirements On Nov. 16, 2009, the Issaquah City Council adopted a new law to reduce landfill waste, litter and pollution by avoiding the use of disposable polystyrene and non- recyclable food service packaging. The law requires – through a phased approach – food service businesses (including restaurants, grocers, coffee shops and other food sellers) to only use recyclable or compostable food service containers and service ware. In addition, the law provides resources to support local businesses and an 18-month period to help businesses make the transition. Foods that are pre-packaged before they are received by a business are not included in this law. When does the new law take effect? The City is following a phased approach: January-October 2010 (Voluntary Phase): There are no mandatory requirements. The City will be assisting businesses with education, communications, customer awareness and incentives. October 2010-May 2011 (Phase 1): Polystyrene containers (sometimes called “Styrofoam”) are not allowed. Recyclable or compostable food service containers and service ware must be used. There will be exemptions, however, for hot containers/lids, utensils and raw meat trays. Business must also participate in a commercial composting program or provide compost containers onsite for consumer use. Businesses can request exemptions through a waiver process. Starting May 2011 (Phase 2): Polystyrene containers are not allowed. Recyclable or compostable food service containers and service ware must be used. Waivers will expire. To see the full timeline, click here or to download flyer click here . Why is the law phased? A phased approach: Provides time to support local businesses with technical assistance and resources to help defray costs and evaluate options. Allows the City Council’s Sustainability Committee to monitor the initial implementation, evaluate the process and, if needed, make adjustments. Packet Page 180 of 208 City of Issaquah - Food Service Packaging http://www.ci.issaquah.wa.us/Page.asp?NavID=2215[2/26/2010 2:57:19 PM] Feb 2010 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 98027 Conditions and Forecast Provides time to evaluate a possible purchasing cooperative among local businesses. Why require recyclable or compostable food service packaging? Non-recyclable and non-compostable food service packaging is often used and disposed of within minutes or days. It can take thousands of years to decompose, however, which has a negative impact on the environment. In addition, Issaquah aims to reduce landfill waste by composting as much food waste as possible. Using compostable packaging allows users to easily dispose of their food waste – and containers – all in one place. What else is the City doing to encourage recycling and composting? Issaquah has adopted aggressive waste prevention and recycling goals to divert up to 65 percent of waste sent to landfills. So far, the City’s efforts include: Offering a free “Sustainable Business Partnership” program – including technical assistance, employee training and incentives – to support Issaquah businesses that recycle food waste (and subsequently reduce their garbage disposal costs). Successfully reducing the environmental footprint of Salmon Days, in partnership with the Chamber Festivals Office, by helping to facilitate a polystyrene ban for the past two years. Hosting, in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce, a forum last July to help local businesses learn more about the options available for compostable food packaging. Additional compostable/recyclable packaging forums will be held in 2010. Recycling is available for Issaquah businesses at no charge. As part of their basic garbage service, businesses are provided with a recycling capacity of up to 200 percent of their garbage collection container size. Educating residents about composting and recycling options. Providing compost and recycling services to all Issaquah residents since 2005 and all Issaquah businesses since 2006. Where do I find more information on recyclable or compostable food service packaging? Contact the City’s Resource Conservation Office (RCO) at 425-837-3400 or by e-mail. Cedar Grove Organics Recycling services Aerial city photograph credit - Tim Heneghan HOME | TOP | WEBSITE HELP | ABOUT THIS SITE Printer friendly version If you have questions regarding the site, please contact the webmaster. Terms of Use | Built using Project A's Site-in-a-Box ©2010 Packet Page 181 of 208 City of Issaquah - Agendas & Minutes http://www.ci.issaquah.wa.us/Agendas.asp?AMID=2175[2/26/2010 3:19:32 PM] Back [sitemap] [advanced search] CALENDAR OF: MEETINGS & EVENTS Today is: February 26, 2010 DAY WEEK MONTH Feb 2010 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 98027 Conditions and Forecast Printer friendly version ARCHIVED - Council Sustainability Committee - Agenda Tuesday, August 18, 2009 Council Sustainability Committee Meeting Notes Committee Members: David Kappler, Chair (present) Maureen McCarry (present) Josh Schaer (present) August 18, 2009 5:30 – 6:45 PM Pickering Room, City Hall NW 1775 12th Avenue NW Staff Liaison: David Fujimoto, Resource Conservation Office Manager Others in Attendance: Larry McIntyre, American Chemistry Council Barry Brandt, Dart Container Dick Lilly, Seattle Public Utilities Heather Trim, People for Puget Sound Stan Phillips, Stan’s BBQ Tom Sessions, Chamber Government Affairs Committee Matthew Bott, Issaquah Chamber of Commerce Susan Boling, Reel Thing Productions Jeb Berrier Reel Thing Productions Susan Robinson, Waste Management Staff Support: David Fujimoto, Manager-Resource Conservation Office Micah Bonkowski, Resource Conservation Coordinator Meeting Notes (D)Polystyrene Food Packaging Agenda Bill Update Joshua Schaer, Council Member Staff provided an update on the Business Information Forum which was co- sponsored by the City and Chamber of Commerce and held on July 28. Staff reviewed the agenda as well as outreach to the business community through a direct mailing, web postings on both the City and Chamber sites, email distribution to Chamber members, hand distribution of flyers and personal phone calls. In addition, materials were collected and made available after the event with information posted online and samples and contact information available at Chamber offices. Council member Schaer provided an updated draft of the ordinance and reviewed changes. The Committee discussed modifications to the effective date, incorporation of recycling provisions, waiver processes and timelines for different types of packaging. Packet Page 182 of 208 City of Issaquah - Agendas & Minutes http://www.ci.issaquah.wa.us/Agendas.asp?AMID=2175[2/26/2010 3:19:32 PM] (I)City of Seattle Implementation Presentation by Seattle Public Utilities Dick Lilly, Business Area Manager with Seattle Public Utilities gave a presentation reviewing the City of Seattle’s polystyrene ordinance and its implementation. The Seattle ordinance is being implemented in two phases, with the initial polystyrene ban having gone into effect January 1. A major goal is to keep food waste, compostable paper and containers from going to the landfill. In addition, he discussed background and approach, business acceptance, costs, environmental benefits and other issues. The committee discussed impacts to local businesses, education of customers, ordinance implementation and phasing, work with schools, products, environmental benefits, waivers and other issues. (D) Public Discussion and Input on Polystyrene Food Packaging Agenda Bill Attendees provided comments and the committee discussed a number of issues related to the draft ordinance, including costs for products and impacts to per unit prices for menu items as well as signage and menus, phasing of the ordinance, impacts of plastics on the aquatic environment and other environmental impacts, enforcement approaches, education of customers, acceptance by businesses, bulk purchasing, recycling program offerings and incentives, institutional polystyrene recycling efforts and other related issues and discussion. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:20 pm. Aerial city photograph credit - Tim Heneghan HOME | TOP | WEBSITE HELP | ABOUT THIS SITE Printer friendly version If you have questions regarding the site, please contact the webmaster. Terms of Use | Built using Project A's Site-in-a-Box ©2010 Packet Page 183 of 208 City Council votes to ban Styrofoam food packaging next year : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/11/16/city-council-votes-to-ban-styrofoam-food-packaging-next-year/[2/26/2010 3:22:59 PM] RSSHOME/NEWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAFFIC CAMS ARCHIVES/HISTORY ADVERTISE ABOUT SUBMIT NEWS SUBSCRIBE CONTACT Local News Opinion Sports Schools Community A&E Calendar Obituaries Business Photo/Video Special Sections Browse > Home / Local News / City Council votes to ban Styrofoam food packaging next year November 16, 2009 By Warren Kagarise Got something to say? Before you comment, please note: These comments are moderated. Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion. Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved. This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic. Name Email Address Website City Council votes to ban Styrofoam foodpackaging next year UPDATED — 1:20 p.m. Nov. 17, 2009 Issaquah joined Seattle, Portland and other eco-conscious cities Monday night when the City Council banned polystyrene takeout containers and other food packaging made from the material. The ban will go into effect in October 2010; restaurants, grocers, public schools and other food sellers will be required to comply by May 2011. Polystyrene — also known under the trademark Styrofoam — is a popular option at restaurants and grocers because the material is cheaper and hardier than compostable alternatives. Critics said the polystyrene lingers in landfills long after Styrofoam trays and cups are tossed into the trash. The material is expensive to recycle as well. City Council members voted 6-1 to approve the ban. Councilman Joshua Schaer proposed the legislation in June. Officials huddled with restaurateurs, industry representatives, business owners and environmentalists to reach the final bill. Schaer said the legislation offered the city the opportunity to lead on environmental issues. Issaquah will be the first Eastside city to ban polystyrene. Councilwoman Eileen Barber cast the vote against the bill. Barber said the ban was ill timed for restaurateurs struggling amid the economic downturn. The legislation includes $56,450 to help city officials reach out to business owners and implement the ban. How the city will pay for the project will be discussed as city officials refine the 2010 budget. The bill will be enforced by “passive compliance” and, essentially, driven by consumer complaints. Violators will be cited by the city code compliance officer and required to pay a fine. Written by Warren Kagarise · Filed Under Local News Comments FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2010 SEARCH: Packet Page 184 of 208 City Council votes to ban Styrofoam food packaging next year : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/11/16/city-council-votes-to-ban-styrofoam-food-packaging-next-year/[2/26/2010 3:22:59 PM] Speak your mind Community Links ArtEAST Chamber of Commerce & Visitor Center City of Issaquah Cougar Mt. Zoo Downtown Issaquah Assoc. Eagles Club Eastside FC Friends of the Iss. Hatchery (FISH) Iss. Alps Trails Club Iss. Amateur Radio Club Iss. Garden Club Iss. Soccer Club Iss. Swim Team Iss. Valley Food & Clothing Bank Issaquah Gliders Issaquah History Museums Issaquah Library Issaquah Quilters Issaquah School District Issaquah Schools Foundation Issaquah Singers Packet Page 185 of 208 City Council votes to ban Styrofoam food packaging next year : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/11/16/city-council-votes-to-ban-styrofoam-food-packaging-next-year/[2/26/2010 3:22:59 PM] Copyright © 2008 Issaquah Press - www.issaquahpress.com · Log in · MOSSO Cloud Hosted Issaquah Women’s Club Issaquah Youth Football Issaquah Youth Lacrosse Kiwanis Club of Issaquah Master Chorus Eastside Mountains to Sound Greenway Partnership for Rural King County Rotary Club of Issaquah Salmon Days Festival Sammamish Rowing Assoc. Sammamish Symphony Orchestra Village Theatre WA State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Trails Assoc. Affiliate Links Newcastle News Sammamish Review Seattle Times SnoValley Star Walla Walla Union Bulletin Yakima Herald Republic Packet Page 186 of 208 Press Editorial : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/09/08/press-editorial-44/#more-13680[2/26/2010 3:25:15 PM] RSSHOME/NEWS CLASSIFIEDS TRAFFIC CAMS ARCHIVES/HISTORY ADVERTISE ABOUT SUBMIT NEWS SUBSCRIBE CONTACT Local News Opinion Sports Schools Community A&E Calendar Obituaries Business Photo/Video Special Sections Browse > Home / Editorial, Opinion / Press Editorial September 8, 2009 By Staff Got something to say? Before you comment, please note: These comments are moderated. Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion. Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved. This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic. Name Email Address Website Speak your mind Press Editorial Baby steps called for in Styrofoam ban By now you’ve probably read about the city’s initial proposal to ban the use of polystyrene — better known as Styrofoam — food containers in Issaquah. This could include everything from takeout food containers to the little tray that holds tonight’s steak.The idea was first proposed by the City Council’s Sustainability Committee. The city of Issaquah has long been regarded as being a leader in resource conservation and recycling, and we’re ready to see more. If the proposed ban is implemented Jan. 1, businesses would be required to use recyclable or compostable food containers. While some business owners are concerned about being forced to change to a more expensive container, they are not all opposed. Matt Bott, executive director of the Chamber of Commerce, has surveyed businesses and heard back from about 20 so far. While we like the idea of reducing plastic trash, we caution the city to take it slow. The economy is tough enough on businesses that are operating on reduced sales and reduced staff — all while worrying about a possible flu epidemic. We hope the city will create baby steps that get us to the polystyrene ban, but maybe not until Jan. 1, 2011. Meanwhile, the Sustainability Committee should also be looking at those darn plastic bags and what can be done about them — without getting into a bag tax! For a step in the right direction, they should mandate attendance of business owners and staff at a workshop that discusses ways to cut down on the use of the bags. Is there some reason soda pop in a 2-liter plastic bottle needs to be wrapped in plastic a second time? Written by Staff · Filed Under Editorial , Opinion Comments FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2010 SEARCH: Packet Page 187 of 208 Press Editorial : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/09/08/press-editorial-44/#more-13680[2/26/2010 3:25:15 PM] Community Links ArtEAST Chamber of Commerce & Visitor Center City of Issaquah Cougar Mt. Zoo Downtown Issaquah Assoc. Eagles Club Eastside FC Friends of the Iss. Hatchery (FISH) Iss. Alps Trails Club Iss. Amateur Radio Club Iss. Garden Club Iss. Soccer Club Iss. Swim Team Iss. Valley Food & Clothing Bank Issaquah Gliders Issaquah History Museums Issaquah Library Issaquah Quilters Issaquah School District Issaquah Schools Foundation Issaquah Singers Issaquah Women’s Club Issaquah Youth Packet Page 188 of 208 Press Editorial : The Issaquah Press – News, Sports, Classifieds in Issaquah, WA http://www.issaquahpress.com/2009/09/08/press-editorial-44/#more-13680[2/26/2010 3:25:15 PM] Copyright © 2008 Issaquah Press - www.issaquahpress.com · Log in · MOSSO Cloud Hosted Football Issaquah Youth Lacrosse Kiwanis Club of Issaquah Master Chorus Eastside Mountains to Sound Greenway Partnership for Rural King County Rotary Club of Issaquah Salmon Days Festival Sammamish Rowing Assoc. Sammamish Symphony Orchestra Village Theatre WA State Parks & Recreation Commission WA Trails Assoc. Affiliate Links Newcastle News Sammamish Review Seattle Times SnoValley Star Walla Walla Union Bulletin Yakima Herald Republic Packet Page 189 of 208 May 2008 King County Green Schools Program Polystyrene Facts What is polystyrene? Polystyrene is a thermoplastic material made from petroleum-derived styrene. Polystyrene is made into both foam and rigid products. Foam or expanded polystyrene (EPS) is either expanded or extruded to manufacture products such as cups, plates, trays and packaging.1 EPS is often mistakenly referred to as Styrofoam, which is a Dow Chemical Company trademarked form of polystyrene foam insulation introduced to the U.S. in 1954. How is polystyrene made? Styrene is the primary chemical component of polystyrene. It is a clear, colorless liquid derived from petroleum and natural gas by-products and formed by a reaction between ethylene and benzene (a hazardous substance). Styrene is used in everything from food containers and packaging materials to cars, boats and computers. It is polymerized by heat or by an initiator, such as benzyl peroxide, and then is suspended in water to form droplets, using a suspension agent. The beads of polystyrene produced by suspension are tiny and hard. To make them expand, special blowing agents (primarily pentane) are used. How much waste does polystyrene create? fi In 2006, the US disposed of 870,000 tons of polystyrene plastic plates and cups (plus 590,000 tons on other polystyrene products), according to the EPA’s report on Municipal Solid Waste.2 fi Although EPS represents only one percent of the waste stream by weight in King County, it makes up a significant volume. Approximately 7.9 million cubic feet of EPS is disposed in King County each year, enough to fill 2½ buildings the size of Seattle’s 38-story Smith Tower. Ultimately, this volume accounts for about 248,000 cubic yards of King County landfill space annually.3 fi Polystyrene takes decades to hundreds of years to dissolve because it does not biodegrade. Instead, it “photo- degrades”, meaning that sunlight breaks it into progressively smaller pieces. However, sunlight does not penetrate modern municipal landfills, therefore making it extremely unlikely that polystyrene will photo- degrade in our landfills.4 Can polystyrene be recycled? fi In some areas of the country, EPS is recycled and used to manufacture new products. Since food residue is a contaminant in the polystyrene recycling process, EPS food trays are rarely recycled. The extra step and cost of washing the trays more often proves prohibitive to recyclers. fi King County has identified EPS as a priority waste and is working to support the establishment of recycling facilities, with a focus on molded packaging. Molded packaging often provides a clean source of EPS that is untainted with food residue or other contaminants. How does polystyrene affect health? fi Most health problems associated with polystyrene are due to exposure during manufacture of styrene or products using styrene (the primary component of polystyrene) and include depression, concentration problems, muscle weakness, tiredness, nausea and eye, ear and throat irritation.5 The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has determined that styrene is a possible carcinogen.6 fi Most exposure cases are associated with industry workers. However, styrene also can be transferred to food from polystyrene cups, plates and trays, and can enter the human body through air (released from industries that make and use styrene). 6 What can you do? fi Purchase and use reusable or compostable products. (Some cities have banned polystyrene. The City of Seattle has proposed a ban on the use of EPS cups and containers in restaurants. 7 Some school districts, such as Issaquah School District in King County, have discontinued use of polystyrene trays -- see example on page 2 -- and instead have selected either reusable or compostable trays.) fi Recycle as options become available. Packet Page 190 of 208 Alternatives to Polystyrene (EPS) Lunch Trays Alternative #1: Durable Lunch Trays Replacing all or some disposable trays with durable, reusable trays is a great option. Reusable products can be more cost effective over time than disposable products, but costs should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Schools with dishwashers and storage space are the best candidates. Examples: fi Starting in March 2008, nine Portland Public Schools have eliminated EPS lunch trays as part of a pilot program. The schools will gather information throughout the school year on cost-effectiveness, volunteer time and the effects on garbage, water and energy use.8 fi In 2006 Henry David Thoreau Elementary School in the Lake Washington School District switched from EPS to durable lunch trays. As a result, the school reduced its solid waste by 82 percent, or 230 cubic yards per year. The switch reduced lunch waste from 6.5 cubic yards of garbage per week (which had included 1,100 disposable EPS trays) to less than 1.2 cubic yards per week. 9 Resources: fi Durable Reusable Lunch Trays and Baskets, prepared by King County Green Schools Alternative #2: Paper/Cardboard (Compostable) Lunch Trays Several schools purchase uncoated cardboard/paper lunch trays, which can be composted along with food scraps. Composting collection is less expensive than garbage collection, and therefore schools can realize cost savings by making this switch and contracting for composting collection. Examples: fi The Davis Joint Unified School District (California) composts cardboard lunch trays at three elementary schools. Set up costs included sorting stations and outreach materials. The schools reduced solid waste by about 40 percent, resulting in an estimated gross savings of $6,230. The district plans to expand the program.10 fi The Issaquah School District, a King County Green Schools Program participant, switched from EPS to compostable paper lunch trays. The trays (purchased from Food Services of America, http://www.fsafood.com) cost twice as much as EPS trays, but the district made the switch as part of an effort to use nontoxic and more environmentally responsible products. In the future, the district would like the trays, along with food scraps, to be collected for composting. Paper options (from KCDA catalog)*: Product Description KCDA No. Mfg No. U/M 1-23 24+ 5 compartment;8”x10”; Chinet 49690 VALLEY 500/Cs $49.27 $47.28 6 compartment; 9”x12”; Chinet 49685 VALISE 500/Cs $61.99 $59.49 3 compartment; 8”x9”; Chinet 49680 VAGRANT 500/Cs $54.67 $52.47 Non-paper biodegradable options*: fi http://www.sinlessbuying.com/tep/catalog/catalog/index.php - Tree Free Biodegradable Trays fi http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/RCP/ProdByType.asp?ProductTypeID=76 - California’s Recycled Content Product Directory *Before buying compostable products, contact your local composting collection company to make sure the product is acceptable. Sources: 1. http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_plastics/sec_pfpg.asp?CID=1432&DID=5224 2. http://www.epa.gov/garbage/pubs/06data.pdf Page 7 3. http://www.metrokc.gov/dnrp/swd/linkup/eNewslink/current.asp 4. Use and Disposal of Polystyrene in California: A Report to the California Legislature Dec 2004 5. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/styrene.html; http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/dwh/t-voc/styrene.html; 6. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html; http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/phs53.html 7. http://www.seattle.gov/util/Services/Garbage/Reduce_Garbage_&_Litter/GreenFeeFoamBanProposals/SPU01_003525.asp 8. http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/portland_news/120536070512750.xml&coll=7 Packet Page 191 of 208 9. http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/dnrp/newsroom/newsreleases/2007/november/1102GreenSchoolsLWSD.aspx 10. http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/FoodWaste/CaseStudies/Contracts/2000/Davis2.pdf Packet Page 192 of 208 City of Seattle Disposable Shopping Bags Green Fee and Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam Food Container Ban FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) Revised June 18, 2008 Packet Page 193 of 208 Green Fees/Foam Ban Frequently Asked Questions June 18, 2008 Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam Food Container Ban FAQ Contents Why ban so-called “Styrofoam” containers and cups? Aren’t other plastics just as bad? See Page 9. Why not also ban EPS foam packaging? Don’t those “Styrofoam peanuts” end up as litter, too? See Page 9. Have any other jurisdictions banned EPS foam food containers. How is it working? See Page 9. Aren’t the alternatives to EPS foam containers just as bad for the environment? See Page 10. Why does the City want to force this change? See Page 10. What about compostable and recyclable alternatives to EPS foam and the other disposable plastics used in food service? See Page 10. How will the City enforce the EPS ban and the green fee on bags? See Page 10. Your study shows that banning EPS food containers and cups is actually worse for the environment than doing nothing so why do it? See Page 11. Disposable Shopping Bags and Green Fee FAQs What are Mayor Greg Nickels and City Council President Richard Conlin proposing? Mayor Greg Nickels and City Council President Richard Conlin are proposing a 20 cent green fee on all disposable shopping bags provided to customers at grocery, drug and convenience stores. The purpose of the green fee is to discourage the use of disposable bags of any type and encourage shoppers to use reusable bags. Nickels and Conlin are also proposing a ban on the use of expanded polystyrene (EPS) containers in restaurants, fast food outlets, coffee shops and all other food service establishments. This includes some of the packaging used at grocery stores such as meat trays and egg cartons. In addition, because there are a number of different kinds of plastics and plastic-coated paper products used for disposable food service ware — “clamshells,” plates, cups, utensils and so forth — they are proposing a deadline two years away by which all such —3— Packet Page 194 of 208 Green Fees/Foam Ban Frequently Asked Questions June 18, 2008 These are not either-or issues. There are lots of ways to cut greenhouse gas emissions and the green fee on disposable shopping bags is one of them. Each alternative, such as carbon taxes on fuel consumption, for example, need to be examined on its merits by government at the appropriate level. Seattle regulates and handles solid waste and can set an example in that area. How much will the green fee cost a typical Seattle resident? Possibly nothing if all the family members regularly take reusable bags with them when they go shopping. In reality, some of the time people will forget and they’ll pay a small amount. If a family’s bag use drops from several hundred now to a few dozen next year when the green fee is in effect, it might be $10. Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Foam Food Container Ban FAQs Why ban so-called “Styrofoam” containers and cups? Aren’t other plastics just as bad? Along with expanded polystyrene (EPS), all the other disposable plastic and plastic- coated paper products in fast food and take-out use have various negative impacts on the environment. None stand out as particularly better or worse than others, except that EPS has proven to be an exceptional problem in litter and particularly marine litter. That’s why a ban is the right way to deal with EPS now. The superiority of compostable and truly recyclable plastic products to the disposable plastic and plastic-coated paper products currently in use is why Nickels and Conlin have set a date two years from now for all food service outlets to switch to compostable and recyclable containers, plates, hot and cold beverage cups and utensils. Why not also ban EPS foam packaging? Don’t those “Styrofoam peanuts” end up as litter, too? The Mayor and City Council in Resolution 30990 asked Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to look first at disposable shopping bags and EPS food service items. Now that that’s done, SPU is studying EPS packaging and a number of other un-recycled, under-recycled and hard-to-recycle materials to see what kinds of policies might decrease their use and/or increase recycling. Have any other jurisdictions banned EPS foam food containers. How is it working? —9— Packet Page 195 of 208 Green Fees/Foam Ban Frequently Asked Questions June 18, 2008 Portland, Oregon, was among the first to ban EPS foam food containers a decade ago. McDonald’s sued the city and lost and that in part that led to the burger chain’s switch to a cardboard container (though sometimes plastic coated), a pretty impressive result for municipal government action. More recently, a number of California cities and counties including San Francisco and Santa Monica have banned EPS in food service and are promoting compostable or recyclable alternatives. Aren’t the alternatives to EPS foam containers just as bad for the environment? Switching from EPS to other disposable plastics can be just as bad and sometimes worse in environmental impact. That’s why Nickels’ and Conlin’s plan takes a second step and mandates that restaurants find compostable and recyclable alternatives to food service disposable plastic and plastic-coated paper products by July 1, 2010. Why does the City want to force this change? There is a long-term environmental goal underlying this policy. Plastic — all kinds of plastics — are persistent in the environment. All the plastic ever made is still around — in landfills, in ocean debris, on beaches, scattered across the land, and in the case of plastic bags, stuck in the trees and against fences. Natural forces such as ultraviolet light may break down plastics into smaller and smaller — but still plastic — particles. As this happens and particularly in the ocean, plastic objects and particles are consumed by animals up and down the food chain. Most notably, this kills birds. In some areas of the ocean, floating plastic outnumbers plankton six to one. Because of plastic’s long term persistence in the environment and its effects, we should minimize the production of plastic and maximize recycling of what is produced. And, of course, that also cuts down greenhouse gas production and the amount of material that has to be landfilled. Are there compostable and recyclable alternatives to EPS foam and the other disposable plastics used in food service? Because more and more jurisdictions here on the West Coast and worldwide are adopting policies to discourage throwaway plastic and plastic-coated paper products in the food service industry, manufacturers and suppliers are responding with new products including compostable plastics made from vegetable sources such as corn starch and sugar cane and, increasingly, from non-food fiber crops and byproducts. These products are currently being developed and tested by the market for how well they do their job in the restaurant and for compostability after use. Change is coming fast so over the next two years there will be a variety of new products for restaurants and coffee shops, delis and so forth to choose from. How will the City enforce the EPS ban and the green fee on bags? —10— Packet Page 196 of 208 Edmonds City Council Retreat Approved Minutes February 5-6, 2010 Page 14 contact their representatives and recommend they support the bill. A brief discussion followed regarding other ways to fund stormwater improvements such as a stormwater surcharge on utility bills and the creation of zones with increased stormwater mitigation and the ability to reduce the mitigation via green methods such as pervious surfaces, rain gardens, etc. B. Implement Sustainable Purchasing Practices (i.e., best value vs. best price contract language); Green Power Purchase by City Councilmember Peterson explained sustainable purchasing practice means buying local to reduce transit costs and supporting local businesses and businesses that are environmentally friendly. He expressed support for formalizing this practice in the City. Mr. Clifton offered to determine whether the City had a sustainable purchasing practice. Council President Bernheim referred to information in the packet regarding Bellingham’s green power challenge, a government initiated program that encourages the use of less power. Sustainable Edmonds is pursuing that program. He planned to introduce a proposal for the City to dedicate a token amount to green power purchase. A brief discussion ensued regarding the Climate Action Plan prepared by the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee that will be reviewed by the Planning Board and forwarded to the Council. C. Green Buildings – Implement LEED Standards for New Construction, Incentivize Green Remodels, Other code Rewrites Councilmember Peterson suggested during the current slower building period, the City devote time to revising its building codes to address this effort. Council President Bernheim referred to draft LEED standards provided in the packet. Council comments included the perception that LEED standards and green practices imposed costs on new construction, intangible benefits of LEED and green buildings, and opportunity for the City to attract developers. D. Education and Communication; Website, Edmonds Green Logo, Speakers’ Series, Local/Regional Partners Councilmember Peterson recommended the City utilize its website and Sustainable Edmonds to educate the public that green buildings are not prohibitively expensive. He advised the Plastic Bag Subcommittee of the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee is working on an Edmonds Green Logo. E. Car Free Day, Parking Space Decommissioning, Electric Car Rally, Unlicense Day Council President Bernheim remarked parking spaces were more economically valuable as pedestrian spaces versus parking spaces. He provided examples of assigning individual or multiple parking spaces downtown to different groups for a day/weekend and allowing them to transform the spaces into pedestrian amenities. Councilmembers commented on Parking Day on Friday, September 17, lack of bike racks downtown, and working with the Cascade Bicycle Club and/or Edmonds Bike Club to site an artistic bike rack downtown. F. Styrofoam Ban Councilmember Peterson advised Seattle passed a Styrofoam ban last year. He suggested Edmonds institute a similar ban with enforcement similar to the plastic bag ban. He suggested this be adopted as one of five action items. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas advised Seattle restaurants found the cost of biodegradable containers was similar and they worked well. Councilmember Peterson commented restaurants also now have the ability to compost food waste. Packet Page 197 of 208 Public Safety Committee Meeting March 9, 2010 Page 1 of 3 Minutes Public Safety Committee Meeting March 9, 2010 Elected Officials Present: Council Member D. J. Wilson, Committee Chair Council Member Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Council Member Steve Bernheim Council Member Diane Buckshnis Staff Present: Assistant Police Chief Gerry Gannon Public Present: Mike McGinnis, Police Foundation Don Eager, Police Foundation Bruce Witenberg, Police Foundation Barry Brandt The meeting was called to order by Chair Wilson at 6:55 p.m. A. Styrofoam Ban The Committee discussed the proposed ordinance for banning Styrofoam from the City of Edmonds. At the February 5-6, 2010 Council Retreat, the Council had expressed interest in moving forward with a Styrofoam ban. Ms. Fraley-Monillas was interested in a grandfather clause in the ordinance that would allow businesses that have Styrofoam products to exhaust their current supply. Mr. Wilson stated that a one year run-out of Styrofoam products is what he would like to see in the ordinance. That is similar to what is in the Issaquah and Seattle ordinances, and in the proposed ordinance written by Mr. Bernheim. Mr. Wilson suggested that the ordinance be moved directly to the Council for discussion of the effective date of the ordinance. One suggestion was to have the effective date at signing, but not enforce the ordinance until May 1, 2011, giving businesses time to deplete their inventory of Styrofoam products. Ms. Fraley-Monillas discussed the effective date and thought it best to follow the proposed draft ordinance by Mr. Bernheim. Both Council members felt that businesses needed time to reduce their supply of Styrofoam products, and one year after signing of the ordinance was sufficient before enforcement started. Ms. Fraley-Monillas also felt that having a waiver process in the ordinance was important. Packet Page 198 of 208 Public Safety Committee Meeting March 9, 2010 Page 2 of 3 The discussion then moved to the penalty portion of the ordinance. Ms. Fraley- Monillas felt the fine language in the proposed ordinance was satisfactory at $100 for a first offense and $300 for any further offenses. Ms. Fraley-Monillas made the point if you have fines in the ordinance and don’t enforce them, then why have the fines. Action: Move to full Council for discussion. B. Contract with Orchid Cellmark for Touch DNA Testing. ACOP Gannon discussed the reason for the request and how the Police Department will use Orchid Cellmark to help identify suspects in property crimes. The testing process used by Orchid Cellmark is sensitive enough to detect DNA left at a crime scene on items touched by a suspect. The Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory has approved the scientific testing process that Orchid Cellmark uses to enter DNA data into the national data base (CODIS). The cost of the testing is based on the number of samples submitted by the Department. There is no charge if samples are not submitted to Orchid Cellmark. ACOP Gannon was asked what the State Crime Laboratory charges for DNA testing. He responded there is no cost for samples submitted to the State Crime Lab, but because of its backlog of cases, the State Crime Lab will process few DNA samples for property crimes and the turnaround time can be lengthy. With no other discussion on the subject, ACOP Gannon asked that the contract be approved for the next consent agenda. He also advised that the contract had been reviewed and approved as to form by the city attorney. Mr. Wilson and Ms. Fraley-Monillas approved the request to go to the consent agenda. Action: Forward to City Council Consent Agenda with a recommendation to approve. C. Amendment of EMC 5.05, Animal Control ACOP Gannon explained the proposed changes to EMC 5.05.121 and 5.05.123 (Potentially Dangerous Dog) to provide for an appeal process should a dog be declared potentially dangerous. While this declaration is tantamount to a warning, recent court decisions support a provision for appeal in the interest of due process. This action is consistent with those taken in and by neighboring jurisdictions. The amended ordinance was prepared by the City Attorney. Mr. Wilson and Ms. Fraley-Monillas were further advised that the amended ordinance had been reviewed and approved as to form by the city attorney. Packet Page 199 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes May 18, 2010 Page 11 photograph Ms. Petso and Mr. Clugston displayed was an example of what the code rewrite would achieve or overcome. Mr. Clugston answered the development in the photograph was illustrative of the way a multi family development could look today. The intent was to improve on that type of development via additional design standards that would allow better access, better onsite parking, better open space provisions, etc. Council President Bernheim asked where the direction for improvement was provided, noting he wanted to ensure the effort was proceeding in the direction the Council chose. Mr. Chave answered that was the reason the Council was kept informed via discussion at Council Committee and why it was scheduled on tonight’s agenda. He agreed staff did not want to make any revisions to the code that the Council would not ultimately support. He explained the intent of the subdivision rewrite was to address provisions no one liked, to improve organization of the code and to incorporate low impact development, affordable housing and sustainability. The Planning Board will explore how to encourage or to require some of those concepts as part of the subdivision update. With regard to cottage housing, Mr. Chave did not envision the development of a cottage housing ordinance as cottage housing was typically higher density, required more rigorous design standards, etc. Currently cottage housing was a housing type that was allowed but there was no density bonus. The Planning Board will discuss whether to clarify in the subdivision code that cottage housing is an allowed type of housing but he did not envision the Planning Board would recommend density bonuses, etc. for cottage housing. If the Council wanted the Planning Board to consider that, he urged the Council to make that clear. He advised the interim PRD ordinance essentially combined the PRD and subdivision process; therefore, it was appropriate to integrate the best features of PRDs into standard subdivisions. Council President Bernheim observed the PRD section was a standalone code due to its unique features. Mr. Chave answered Edmonds’ PRD ordinance was different than most jurisdictions; many jurisdictions allowed density bonuses. Edmonds’ PRD process was an alternate form of subdivision and did not allow density bonuses. Instead, it allowed more flexibility in standards and in exchange the developer must provide compatibility, achieve certain purposes, etc. The intent is to review those purposes to ensure they were still appropriate as there was some question as to whether they were effectively promoting sustainability. Mr. Snyder advised flexibility via a PRD is so limited that there is little distinction between a PRD and a standard subdivision. He summarized the typical attributes of a PRD allowed by most jurisdictions were not present in the City’s PRD ordinance. Mr. Chave explained a developer currently must apply for a PRD and a subdivision and they are processed on parallel but different tracks. In the rewrite, a PRD would be a combined PRD/subdivision application for which one approval was provided. He assured the public process would not be diminished but it would provide a consistent application process. He explained the PRD was essentially the only tool the City had to address different housing choices. For example, cottage housing is a type of housing, small houses arranged in a mini-neighborhood setting, and that type of housing may be in more demand in the future. If the code does not specifically state cottage housing is a potential option within a subdivision, it would not happen. He noted there has been come concern that as people age they are unable to finding affordable housing in Edmonds. The intent is to ensure there are housing choices that allow people to remain in the community. 9. DISCUSSION OF STYROFOAM BAN. Council President Bernheim explained at the 2010 Council retreat it was agreed the Council would proceed with a ban on Styrofoam food containers in the City. He referred to the draft ordinance he prepared, explaining the purpose of the ordinance would be that by a certain date food service businesses including tenants on City-owned property would be prohibited from selling or providing, in connection with food service, polystyrene, non-recyclable, or non-compostable food service packaging or disposable Packet Page 200 of 208 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes May 18, 2010 Page 12 food service ware. Food service businesses would be required to provide takeaway food in recyclable or compostable product and to have recycling or composting bins on site. The ordinance also includes a penalty for use of the products. The effective date of the ordinance would be at least a year from adoption to allow an education period and time for merchants to deplete existing inventory of polystyrene products. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BERNHEIM, FOR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. City Attorney Scott Snyder observed the proposal was not in ordinance form and suggested staff draft an ordinance for approval on a future agenda. Council President Bernheim suggested the City Attorney draft an ordinance and a public hearing be scheduled within the next 30-45 days. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out Seattle and other cities have successfully banned on Styrofoam and she felt it was achievable in Edmonds. Councilmember Wilson referred to Section 3 that required businesses to use a recyclable or compostable product and asked if that was the same language used by Seattle and Issaquah. He was concerned with the term recyclable, noting an array of plastics could be considered recyclable. Council President Bernheim referred to the definition of recyclable, made solely of materials that are capable of being separated from a waste stream by a food service business and made available for collection and delivery to a processor for reuse or remanufacture into the same or other products. He recalled that language was from Issaquah’s ordinance. Councilmember Wilson feared a plastic container could be recyclable but not meet the intent of the ordinance. Council President Bernheim advised that issue was addressed in Section 8.07.030 of the Issaquah ordinance. He suggested consulting with Issaquah and Seattle regarding their experience. Mr. Snyder suggested including in the record the scientific information that describes the problems with polystyrene and why they are not recyclable. He noted it was not only the polystyrene waste but also the environmental impacts of polystyrene production. Councilmember Peterson recalled a SEPA review was conducted on the plastic bag ordinance and asked whether a SEPA review would be appropriate for the ban on polystyrene. Mr. Snyder agreed it would be. Councilmember Wilson observed ten years ago when Portland adopted a similar ban, McDonald’s sued and lost and as a result changed all their packaging. He asked the legal basis for the City’s authority to ban polystyrene. Mr. Snyder answered the legal principles regarding cities’ police powers to regulate materials that come into the environment of a community are well established. He offered to provide that information along with the scientific data and the ordinance. Councilmember Wilson asked whether there had been any other legal actions with regard to banning polystyrene. Mr. Snyder reiterated cities’ police powers are well established, the primary limitations are commerce clause limitations for goods that travel between states and products packaged for local consumption. He referred to an exemption in the proposal for materials that arrive sealed to a business owner. The basis for that exemption is the commerce clause. Councilmember Wilson inquired about enforcement. Mayor Haakenson answered he would address enforcement at the time of the public hearing, assuring staff would not be in the Styrofoam enforcement business. Mayor Haakenson restated the motion as follows: DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING DATE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 201 of 208 GO NEWS ROOM Issues In-Depth Local Headlines News Releases Public Hearings and Forums Shows Videos Videos: City Council Only Videos: Mayor Only New compostable food tray debuts today at Seattle’s Metropolitan Market Specially developed in response to Seattle ordinance which requires all single-use, throw-away food packaging to be compostable or recyclable by July 1 SEATTLE -- A new product, first of its kind in the world, makes its debut in Seattle today when local chain Metropolitan Market rolls out a fully compostable tan tray for meat, fish and poultry sales. The new type of tray, a “bioplastic” made entirely from corn and not petroleum, was developed by the packaging industry in response to Seattle’s ordinance that requires all single-use food service packaging at quick-serve restaurants and grocery stores to be either compostable or recyclable. The ordinance takes effect July 1. The new food service packaging requirements mean Seattle will stop sending 6,000 tons of plastic and plastic-coated paper single-use food service ware and leftover food to the landfill in Oregon every year. That’s the equivalent of eliminating 225 shipping containers of waste, or a garbage train more than 100 cars long. “This is a revolutionary step to cut down on landfill waste, and we’re delighted to be the first supermarket we know of worldwide to adopt the system,” said Brad Halverson, vice president of marketing at Metropolitan Market. “Our Seattle customers will now be able to redirect an estimated one million meat trays per year--about five 53-foot trailers full-- into compost.” “The brown-toned tray clearly looks different from the old white and black plastic foam containers now prohibited in Seattle. The tan color will help residents know that they can put this tray in their food and yard waste carts,” said Dick Lilly, waste prevention manager for Seattle Public Utilities. The new bioplastic foam trays were developed by food service packaging suppliers and distributors Kenco and BunzlR3 working with the manufacturer, Pactiv. They are being marketed under the name EarthChoice. “Switching from petroleum-based plastic foam to bioplastic reduces green house gas generation at the same time composting the new trays means less waste,” said Lilly. Seattle banned “Styrofoam” products from restaurant use on January 1, 2009. The city’s ordinance gave the grocery industry 18 months more to develop a compostable alternative for meat trays. None existed when the city’s law was passed. “The packaging industry has stepped up and created new products that make it possible to really reduce waste in the food service business,” Lilly said. In addition to the new meat trays at Metropolitan Market, in the next week customers can expect to see similar brown-toned meat and fish trays at QFC and Fred Meyer stores. A variety of new, compostable food service ware is also already appearing in many Seattle quick-serve restaurants, he said. “Making it easy for consumers to recognize compostable food packaging by its tan color will help prevent contamination in the waste stream,” said Susan Thoman, director of sales and marketing for Cedar Grove Composting. All approved compostable products, along with food and yard waste, are delivered to Cedar Grove Composting. The compost is later used as soil amendment in local parks and gardens. City of Seattle Mike McGinn, Mayor NEWS ADVISORY SUBJECT: New compostable food tray debuts today at Seattle’s Metropolitan Market FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 6/22/2010 10:00:00 AM FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: SPU Customer Service (206) 684-3000 Seattle Channel -- News Room -- City News Releases 1http://www.seattlechannel.org/news/detail.asp?ID=10842&Dept=20Packet Page 202 of 208 Seattle, closely followed by Issaquah later this year, is the first market area in the U.S. to require that single-use food service packaging be either compostable or recyclable. Similar but less comprehensive regulations for single-use food service packaging are being tried in San Francisco and Toronto. The up-front cost of compostable meat trays is less than twice what “Styrofoam” trays cost, but the difference per item is just pennies, according to Kenco spokesman Howard Knopf. It’s about 2 cents per tray for small trays, 8 cents for large “family pack” trays. The cost difference between compostable products and the plastic or plastic-coated paper food service products they replace is dropping steadily, he said. Learn more about Seattle Public Utilities, at: www.seattle.gov/util. Follow SPU on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SeattleSPU. In addition to providing more than 1.3 million customers in the metropolitan area with a reliable water supply, SPU provides solid waste services in Seattle and essential sewer, drainage and engineering services that safeguard public health, maintain the city’s infrastructure and protect, conserve and enhance the region's environmental resources. Back to News Release Home Page and News Release Search Seattle Channel, City of Seattle 600 4th Avenue FL L1 -- P.O. Box 94727 -- Seattle, WA 98124-4727 Viewer Comment Line: 206-684-8821 Email: contact@seattlechannel.org Seattlechannel.org: News | Community | Arts | Shows | TV Schedule | Videos | Watch Live | About Us | Contact Us The Seattle Channel is a service of the City of Seattle. Visit Seattle.gov Copyright © 1995-2009 City of Seattle Questions/Complaints Privacy & Security Policy Seattle Channel -- News Room -- City News Releases 2http://www.seattlechannel.org/news/detail.asp?ID=10842&Dept=20Packet Page 203 of 208 Packet Page 204 of 208 Packet Page 205 of 208 Packet Page 206 of 208 AM-3218 7. Appointment to Fill the Vacant Position of Mayor Edmonds City Council Meeting Date:07/20/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time:60 Minutes Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Review Committee: Committee Action: Information Subject Title Appointment to fill the vacant position of Mayor. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff N/A Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Eight applications were received by the City Clerk's Office for the vacant position of Mayor. Interviews were conducted by the City Council on July 13, 2010. Attached is a copy of the rules used previously to fill a vacancy on the City Council; the rules were changed only in the title of the document to reflect the Mayor's position. Nomination forms as well as ballots will be provided at the City Council Meeting. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Rules for Nomination / Election Process Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 01:58 PM APRV 2 Community Services/Economic Dev. Stephen Clifton 07/15/2010 04:49 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 07/15/2010 04:50 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 07/15/2010 01:54 PM Final Approval Date: 07/15/2010 Packet Page 207 of 208 Approved 01-20-2009 RULES FOR NOMINATION/ELECTION TO FILL MAYOR VACANCY Nominations Each Councilmember may nominate one candidate from the list of applicants by placing an “X” beside the name of the applicant of his or her choice on the form supplied for that purpose by the City Clerk, and by signing the nomination form. The City Clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of the nominations and of the Councilmember nominating each candidate. The Election Each Councilmember may vote for one candidate by placing an “X” beside the name of the candidate of his or her choice on the ballot supplied for that purpose by the City Clerk, and by signing the ballot. The City Clerk will announce and maintain a permanent record of each ballot and who voted for each candidate. A Deadlock A deadlock occurs after each Councilmember votes the same way on three consecutive ballots. In the event the City Council should deadlock, then previous nominations are declared null and void and the Council may begin a new round of nominations. Packet Page 208 of 208