2011.10.04 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex
250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds
OCTOBER 4, 2011
5:30 p.m.
Call to Order and Flag Salute
1. (90 Minutes) Convene in executive session regarding RCW 42.30.110(1)(f) to receive and evaluate
a complaint or charges brought against a public officer or employee, and
42.30.110(1)(i) potential litigation.
Reconvene in Open Session
2. (5 Minutes) Potential action as a result of executive session discussion.
3. (5 Minutes) Approval of Agenda
4. (5 Minutes) Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A.Roll Call
B. AM-4241 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2011.
C. AM-4239 Approval of claim checks #127981 through #128135 dated September 29, 2011 for
$331,695.17.
D. AM-4235 Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages submitted by Roberta Lynn Sanitate
($56,742.68)
E. AM-4237 Interlocal Agreement between Snohomish County and the City of Edmonds relating to
prisoner transport.
5. (5 Minutes)
AM-4234
Proclamation in recognition of October as National Arts & Humanities Month.
Packet Page 1 of 253
6. (10 Minutes)
AM-4236
Update from the Edmonds Center for the Arts/Public Facilities District - Third
Quarter 2011.
7. (15 Minutes)
AM-4244
Hearing Examiner's Annual Report.
8. (15 Minutes)
AM-4243
Presentation of the 2012 Preliminary Budget.
9. (30 Minutes)
AM-4240
Public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan Element Update for 2012-2017 to the
City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The proposal
updates the City's Capital Facilities Plan to include improvements, additions,
upgrades or extensions of City infrastructure such as transportation, parks and
stormwater along with other public facilities necessary to implement the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
10.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public
Hearings.
11. (15 Minutes)
AM-4245
Further discussion and potential action on a proposed change order policy for the
City of Edmonds that will guide processing and approval by the administration and
City Council.
12. (30 Minutes)
AM-4242
Discussion and possible action regarding BD1 retail only zone. (Public comment
will be received.)
13. (15 Minutes)
AM-4238
Compensation Consultant Update.
14. (5 Minutes) Mayor's Comments
15. (15 Minutes) Council Comments
ADJOURN
Packet Page 2 of 253
AM-4241 Item #: 4. B.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2011.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the draft minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
Attachments
09-27-11 Draft City Council Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 09/29/2011 02:06 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 3 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
September 27, 2011
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Peterson in the
Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Strom Peterson, Mayor Pro Tem
Lora Petso, Council President Pro Tem
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Mike Cooper, Mayor
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Alex Springer, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic
Development Director
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Jim Tarte, Interim Finance Director
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Renee McRae, Recreation Manager
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Carl Nelson, CIO
Rob English, City Engineer
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Bernheim requested Item 7 be removed from the agenda as not all Councilmembers were
present this evening. Item 7 was deferred to the October 4 meeting when all Councilmembers were
expected to be present.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BERNHEIM, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF JOINT CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING BOARD AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2011.
C. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2011.
D. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #127863 THROUGH #127980 DATED SEPTEMBER
22, 2011 FOR $831,167.90. APPROVAL OF THE REISSUANCE OF PAYROLL CHECK
#50814 FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 16, 2011 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2011 IN THE
Packet Page 4 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 2
AMOUNT OF $880.37 AND PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #50815
THROUGH #50853 FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 THROUGH SEPTEMBER
15, 2011 FOR $625,953.69.
E. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES SUBMITTED BY AMY
MURPHY ($360.15).
3. PRESENTATION BY THE EDMONDS POLICE FOUNDATION,
Chris Fleck, Edmonds Police Foundation President, read the Foundation’s mission: to enhance
community education and security by supporting the programs and activities of the Edmonds Police
Department with special emphasis on youth services and crime prevention. The Foundation began in
1996, an evolution of the Chief’s Roundtable under Police Chief Tom Miller, and was the first such
organization in Washington State. Through fundraising over the past year, the Edmonds Police
Foundation paid for the new police dog Kyra, and this summer produced the annual Edmonds Night Out,
a free community safety program providing family fun and public safety awareness.
Mr. Fleck presented three Emeritus title awards to retiring Foundation Board members Harold Huston, a
founding member in 1996, past president and volunteer; Nancy Crim, a founding member, past president
and volunteer; and Norm Hagen, past president and treasurer. He noted all three continue to contribute to
the Edmonds Police Foundation through fundraising, volunteer activities and personal donations.
Mayor Pro Tem Peterson thanked the Edmonds Police Foundation for their efforts.
4. UPDATE BY THE SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY COMMISSION FOR HEALTH AND
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SWIM
LESSONS TO THIRD GRADE STUDENTS AND THE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE A SUMMER
INTENSIVE HEALTH AND XFIT TRAINING CAMP.
Recreation Manager Renee McRae explained the City participates in Creative Community Connections
which was formed due to concern with the growing epidemic of childhood obesity. Nearly 1 in 3 children
in America are overweight or obese, putting them at risk for chronic health problems such as diabetes,
heart disease, high blood pressure, cancer and asthma. Creative Community Connections worked
collaboratively to submit funding proposals to the South Snohomish County Commission for Health to
combat childhood obesity. Partners include the Edmonds School District; the cities of Edmonds,
Mountlake Terrace, and Lynnwood; the Alderwood and Edmonds Boys and Girls Club; the Edmonds
Public Schools Foundation; and the Cascade Bicycle Club.
Swim lessons for third graders and a summer intensive health and xfit training camp for teens are the
result of funding awards received from the Commission for Health in their first round of awards. The
swim lesson program is part of a collaborative effort between Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake
Terrace. The funding is for a 3-year period; third graders, of which there are 1,400 in the Edmonds School
District, will each receive 3 free swim lessons. Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace both have year round
pools; Edmonds will take part in the program next summer.
The xfit camp will also take place next summer. Edmonds is excited to offer this program that combines
fitness and nutrition including farm-to-home produce and cooking classes. This program is designed to
engage behavior change by helping teens to be more active, make better nutritional choices and establish
healthier habits. Teens will learn the importance of physical activity in their everyday lives and how
proper nutrition plays a role in providing energy to work out. The goal is to reduce the risk of chronic
health problems and help teens to experience success and personal satisfaction by improving their self-
image. The funding proposals also fit with the Let’s Move Initiative that Edmonds joined earlier this year.
Packet Page 5 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 3
Ms. McRae thanked the South Snohomish County Commission for Health for funding the proposals.
Carl Zapora, Superintendent, South Snohomish County Commission for Health, recognized
Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace for their collaboration on this proposal. He explained South
Snohomish County Commission for Health is a new program operated by Hospital District #2. For the
past 60 years, the Hospital District owned and operated Stevens Hospital. Operation of the hospital was
turned over to Swedish and it is now Swedish-Edmonds. It is still the community’s hospital and the
Hospital District still owns the hospital and property.
One of the benefits of the affiliation and partnership with Swedish is the new program, South Snohomish
County Commission for Health, which has $3.9 million available to invest in the community. The
Commission’s mission statement is to improve the health and wellbeing of the community.
Mr. Zapora reiterated his recognition of Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace for developing this
proposal. The proposal will ensure that every third grader had an opportunity to learn how to swim as
well as provide opportunities for good nutrition and exercise via the xfit camp.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
FRALEY-MONILLAS, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT TO
PROVIDE SWIM LESSONS TO THIRD GRADE STUDENTS AND THE AGREEMENT TO
PROVIDE A SUMMER INTENSIVE HEALTH AND XFIT TRAINING CAMP. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Peterson requested citizens refrain from comments related to campaigns.
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, provided a chronology of events: in July 2010 Mayor Cooper hires Kim Cole
as his executive assistant at a salary of $79,000 which is in the 70th percentile for positions, an excessive
salary for someone with Ms. Cole’s experience and higher than her more experienced predecessor. Over
100 applicants applied for that position and none were interviewed. A year ago concerns began that Ms.
Cole’s time sheet reporting hours were in excess of what was observed by some staff members. After
hearing Ms. Cole was investigating one or more employees, Mr. Wambolt filed a public records request
on September 21 to learn of any records requested by Ms. Cole. On September 22, Ms. Humann was
fired. On September 23, he learned Ms. Cole had filed a public records request on September 20
requesting written or electronic files Ms. Humann had related to Ms. Cole. On September 25 it was
revealed that Ms. Cole, by mutual agreement, is no longer employed by the city. Also on September 25
the State Auditor contacted Finance Director Jim Tarte asking to audit the time sheets of an unnamed
employee. Mr. Wambolt requested the Council, 1) examine the proposed audit to ensure it will provide
complete enough information to finalize the time sheet issue, and 2) ensure that the City’s termination
policy was fully adhered to, in particular whether a $50,000 severance package was offered to Ms.
Humann and making the reason for the firing known to the public.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, explained last year following a proposal to close the State library in Olympia,
the Secretary of State took over the cost of operating the library. That proposal is likely to be made again
this year. He encouraged anyone interested in retaining funding for the State library to call the legislative
hotline, 800-562-6000.
Dave Page, Edmonds, asked whether the Council planned to hold a public hearing regarding the BD1
retail only zone. Mayor Pro Tem Peterson advised it will be scheduled on next week’s agenda for
discussion but it is not currently scheduled as a public hearing. Mr. Page urged the Council to consider
holding a public hearing, opining that this type of zoning was close to a taking due to encroachment on
Packet Page 6 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 4
commercial property owners’ rights. He suggested property owners be invited to speak at the public
hearing.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, agreed with the suggestion to solicit input from downtown property owners
regarding uses in their buildings. He suggested a property owner may be unable to lease a space to the
type of business required by the proposed regulations envisioned and may need the income from leasing
to other businesses. He commented on the mismanagement of the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA)
and the people serving on the Public Facilities District Board. He suggested further public discussion be
held regarding the City paying the ECA’s bond debt.
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, owner of the historic house on Main Street, encouraged the Council to invite
property owners to a public hearing regarding the proposed BD1 retail only zone. She hoped to have a
retail business lease her property. She expressed her appreciation to Mr. Clifton for his assistance in
attracting a retailer for her property.
6. PRESENTATION ON THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2012-2017) AND THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2012-2017).
City Engineer Rob English explained the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is mandated by the Growth
Management Act (GMA) and includes 6-year and 20-year time frames and includes capital projects
related to growth. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is not mandated but projects in the CIP are
coordinated with the budget.
He provided a comparison of the CIP and CFP:
CIP CFP
Mandate? None GMA
Reason? Budget GMA
Time Frame? 6 year 6 year
20 year
Must include Capital? Yes Yes
Must include Maintenance? Yes No
Mr. English provided a diagram showing components found only in the CIP and only in the CFP and
components found in both the CIP and CFP. The CIP contains 6-year maintenance projects with funding
sources as well as 6-year capital projects with funding sources; the CFP contains long range (20-year)
capital project needs as well as 6-year capital projects with funding sources.
The draft 2012-2017 CFP contains 3 project sections:
• General
o Parks, buildings & regional projects
• Transportation
o Safety/capacity & pedestrian/bicycle
• Stormwater
Mr. English explained two projects have been added to this year’s CFP:
• Sunset Avenue Walkway
o Added to Transportation CFP
o Supported by 2008 Parks Plan
o Conceptual estimate $917,000
o 2015 design
o 2016 construction
Packet Page 7 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 5
• Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Creek/ Willow Creek Feasibility Study
o Added to Stormwater CFP
o Supported by 2010 Stormwater Plan
• Edmonds Marsh Restoration
• Willow Creek Daylighting
o Purpose – Study to define scope of future improvements for fish passage and water flow
o Funding
• $150,000 in Stormwater Fund
• $50,0000 in Parks CIP
o Programmed in 2012 Budget
Mr. English explained that one additional project is proposed to be added:
• Public Market Facility (Downtown Waterfront)
o Add to CFP (General)
o Supported by 2008 Parks Plan
• Regional park for downtown waterfront
o Cost unknown
o Program year unknown – seeking Council direction
o Add to CIP
• 125 REET-2 Parks Improvement Fund
Mr. English reviewed the 2012-2017 CIP:
• Provides supporting information for CFP
• 2 project sections:
o General & Parks
• Organized by City’s financial fund numbers
• Preliminary estimates on 6 year expenditures and revenue
Mr. English provided a summary of fund numbers in the CIP and departments managing each fund:
Fund Description Department
112 Transportation Public Works
113 Multimodal Transportation Community Services
116 Buildings Maintenance Public Works
125 REET-2 Transportation Public Works
125 REET-2 Parks Improvement Parks & Recreation
126 Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation
129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation
132 Parks- Construction (Grant
Funding)
Parks & Recreation
412-100 Water Projects Public Works
412-200 Storm Projects Public Works
412-300 Sewer Projects Public Works
414 Wastewater Treatment Plant Public Works
Mr. English highlighted:
• 112 Street Fund projects:
o 226th St. Walkway (completed)
o Shell Valley Emergency Road (construction)
Packet Page 8 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 6
o Dayton St Overlay (2011)
o Main St – 5th Ave to 6th Ave (2011-12)
o 228th St. Corridor Improvements (design 2011-12)
o Five Corners Roundabout (design 2011-12)
o 212th & 76th Ave (design 2012)
• 412 Utility Fund projects:
o 17,400 feet of replaced water mains (construction)
o 5,900 feet of water main replacement (2012)
o Alderwood Meter Improvements (completed)
o 12th Ave Storm Drainage Improvements (completed)
o Dayton Street Storm Drainage Improvements (construction)
o Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements (2012)
o Sewer Lift Station 2 upgrade (construction)
o Rehabilitation of 9 Sewer Lift Stations (2012-13)
o 2,900 feet of sewer main replacement/rehabilitation (2012)
o 2012 Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite highlighted projects in the 2011 CIP:
• Yost pool repairs (completed)
• Groundbreaking and progress on Interurban trail (underway, targeted for completion 2011)
• Old Milltown courtyard (groundbreaking September 30, targeted for completion 2011)
• SR 99 International District (design and planning)
• 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor (planning)
Ms. Hite highlighted CFP projects:
• Added Public Market
• Development of Woodway HS Athletic Complex
Ms. Hite highlighted REET 125 funded projects:
• Reprioritized a few projects
• Completion of City Park playground equipment and Dayton Street Plaza next year.
• Added Edmonds Marsh Study (need match)
• Added Park Impact Fee study as placeholder
• Added another $120,000 for Yost to replace boiler
• $120,000 currently in CFP for amenities at Yost Pool (slide)
She highlighted Park Construction Fund 132 projects, advising this fund does not have its own revenue
source; it receives funding from grants and transfers from REET 125:
• 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor planning
• Dayton Street Plaza
• Completion of Interurban Trail
• Spray Park (unsecured funding)
• Senior Center Improvements: subject to CDBG (unsecured funding)
Mr. English reviewed the schedule:
• September 14 – CSDS Committee
• September 27 – City Council; Introduction
• September 28 – Planning Board
• October 4 – City Council Public Hearing
Packet Page 9 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 7
• Dec 2011 – Adopt CFP with Comprehensive Plan Update
Mr. English explained no action is requested tonight; this is presented tonight to answer Council
questions in preparation for the public hearing next week.
Council President Pro Tem Petso asked about funding estimates in the CFP/CIP. Mr. English answered
beyond the first two years (2012-2013), estimates are at a planning/conceptual level. The further a project
goes in design, the more accurate the estimate becomes.
Council President Pro Tem Petso observed funding 3-4 years out may be reasonable for the public market
project due to its conceptual nature at this time. Mr. English agreed that would be reasonable.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested moving up some of the less costly non-motorized projects to help
with Complete Streets and moving funding for one of the more expensive projects to a later year. Mr.
English answered that is a Council decision. Projects are limited by funding and there is not a great deal
of transportation funding available. A majority of the projects scheduled for 2012 are grant funded. The
small amount of money available is used as matching funds for transportation grant dollars. While the
Council could choose to fund a few smaller pedestrian projects, it would be trading leveraging dollars for
funding a smaller project.
Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about engaging volunteers to help with cleaning parks, trails, etc. She
recalled a city park cleanup two years ago and suggested doing that again next year.
Councilmember Bernheim inquired about the Dayton Street Plaza. Ms. Hite explained it is the courtyard
north of the Public Works facility where Artworks is located. The plaza was designed 2-3 years ago; it
has been in the CIP for the past several years. Approximately $32,500 was received in donations from the
community and there is $135,000 in the CIP to complete the project. Councilmember Bernheim asked
how much money has been spent on that project to date. Ms. Hite was not certain.
Councilmember Bernheim expressed interest in public comment about the Five Corners roundabout,
advising he was open to reconsidering that project. Although the local contribution to that project is small
and the federal contribution substantial, he did not support proceeding with the project unless it was
beneficial to the community. It was his belief that that intersection could put 100 cars through every 5
minutes. He asked whether that was enough or whether that was equivalent to an F rating for the
intersection. He suggested reconsidering the Five Corners roundabout and possibly removing it from the
list. He recognized projects needed to be in the CFP to receive grant funds; conversely if an undesired
project is included, it may receive funding.
Councilmember Bernheim commented although he supported building an Arts Museum, he was uncertain
how it would be funded. That project is included in the CFP at a funding level of $5 million. If the intent
was for the CFP to be realistic, he questioned whether building a $5 million Arts Museum was the best
use of funds to support the arts. He viewed the Arts Museum as at least a 30-year project and not a 10-
year project.
Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the Haines Wharf Park project was funded and built because it was
in the CFP/CIP. He referred to the CFP as a wish list, commenting the Aquatics Center could be funded
via a bond measure if there was enough community support. He suggested the Arts Museum and Five
Corners roundabout be reconsidered.
Councilmember Wilson agreed with Councilmember Bernheim that the CFP is a wish list, pointing out it
would be difficult to get four votes on the Council to delete the Arts Museum from the CFP.
Consequently, the list does not reflect the Council’s priorities. He acknowledged there were items on the
Packet Page 10 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 8
CFP that the Council requested staff devote time to such as the Senior Center and Civic Ball Field
Acquisition.
For Councilmember Wilson, Ms. Hite explained the Edmonds School District convened a meeting several
months ago regarding the Woodway High School Athletic Complex. The District is interested in creating
additional fields for their students/schools having recently closed the Lynnwood fields after selling
Lynnwood High School and has some funds set aside for field development. Lynnwood and Mountlake
Terrace are also interested in creating additional field space. The site is identified in the City’s Park,
Recreation and Open Space Plan. There is strong language and priority at the RCO level to create more
fields and athletic space. There has been some discussion with the South Snohomish County Commission
for Health about providing capital dollars for development to increase students’ activity levels. The land
at the Woodway High School is owned by DNR, not the Edmonds School District.
Ms. Hite commented the Edmonds School District is not receptive to selling the civic stadium property at
this time. The City’s lease of civic stadium extends through 2020. Staff will continue discussions with the
School District regarding the civic stadium property.
Councilmember Wilson recalled funding sources are identified in the first three years of the CIP and are
less defined in years 4-6. He observed the third year of the CIP contains a $75,000 allocation for Yost
Park and Pool. Ms. Hite answered those funds are to replace the playground at Yost Park.
Councilmember Wilson echoed Councilmember Bernheim’s comments regarding the Five Corners’
roundabout. He voted in favor of authorizing the design contract after hearing support from the
community for the project if a significant portion of the funds were provided by a source other than
Edmonds. He has since heard in the post-Congressional debt crisis fiasco that all the money is “our
money.” He anticipated a number of Councilmembers may have supported the project because it was on
the CIP and staff had already done a great deal of work but may not be a high priority to any
Councilmember.
Councilmember Wilson advised Lake Ballinger was a priority to him and the plan includes approximately
$100,000/year. He asked whether those funds were allocated to construction of culverts. Public Works
Director Phil Williams answered the City is working closely with Mountlake Terrace and Lake Forest
Park to develop a capital plan for Lake Ballinger. With regard to culvert replacement on the Nile
property, Mountlake Terrace is taking the lead on that project as the property is in their jurisdiction.
Edmonds will provide some capital funds for the project. Councilmember Wilson explained the City
signed an Interlocal agreement with Mountlake Terrace for construction of that project next summer
which will mitigate a significant amount of flooding.
Councilmember Wilson observed the plan contains $10,000 for traffic mitigation, recalling Mr. Williams’
indication that the Council could increase funding in the CIP for that project if they wished.
Councilmember Wilson relayed the single-most common concern he hears from residents is regarding
traffic speeds in neighborhoods. To the extent that the plan is a list of Council priorities, he suggested
increasing traffic calming funds from $10,000 to $50,000.
7. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING BD1 RETAIL ONLY ZONE
This item was rescheduled for the October 4 Council meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Peterson explained the motion on this proposal failed when only five Councilmembers
were present. There was a subsequent request made to reschedule it on an agenda when all
Councilmembers were present. He advised there was not adequate time to schedule a public hearing next
week but it could be scheduled for public comment.
Packet Page 11 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 9
8. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported Snohomish Health District continues to do more with less,
similar to all government entities. The District plans to raise fees and permit charges; no programs have
been eliminated yet.
Councilmember Wilson reported on today’s Lake Ballinger Forum meeting. Mountlake Terrace is taking
the lead on the culvert project. The Forum is hopeful the Lake Ballinger project will be identified as one
of the top water resource projects in the State. Councilmember Wilson also reported on the Lodging Tax
Advisory Committee meeting.
Councilmember Wilson reported the SNOCOM Board is striving for a zero percent increase to member
agencies in 2012.
Councilmember Bernheim commented on the importance of improvements to Lake Ballinger. The
Interurban Trail increases access to the lake and there is a small Edmonds park on the lake.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Economic Development Commission met with the Planning
Board and City Council for the first Strategic Plan retreat. The consultants are interviewing directors and
Councilmembers. She reported Snohomish County Tomorrow’s general assembly meeting will be held
tomorrow at Lynnwood Convention Center.
Council President Pro Tem Petso reported on the Public Facilities District Board (PFD) meeting. The
Executive Director will provide a quarterly report at the next Council meeting. The PFD Board passed a
motion in support of the bond refinance proposal.
Council President Pro Tem Petso reported the preliminary analysis regarding a Regional Fire Authority
(RFA) found there may be enough money to make a RFA feasible. Consideration of a RFA will continue.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Pro Tem Peterson referred to recent changes in City staff, acknowledging that is the Mayor’s
prerogative and is not the Council’s role to interfere in employment matters other than to ensure that the
City’s policies and procedures were followed. He encouraged the public not to ask questions of
Councilmembers as they were very limited in what they know or could say.
Mayor Pro Tem Peterson reported on the Edmonds Center for the Arts’ very successful, sold out
fundraising event, Arts Crush.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Wilson commented he was generally supportive of the idea of limiting downtown
commercial storefronts to retail. He explained a common theme in successful economic development is
opportunities for foot traffic and window shopping to encourage shoppers to meander. Areas with no
opportunity for window shopping due to either undeveloped parcels or service entities limit the extension
of retail activity. With regard to Ms. Longstaff’s comments, he suggested allowing an exemption for
historic buildings that cannot facilitate window shopping. He concluded now is the time to make this
determination, not after all the storefronts are filled. Investments are being made in the downtown core
via the Business Improvement District, the Main Street project between 5th & 6th, etc.
Packet Page 12 of 253
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
September 27, 2011
Page 10
Councilmember Bernheim inquired whether structures on the City, State or National Historic Register
could be exempted from regulations such as the BD1 retail only zone.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported during her vacation on the Oregon coast she looked at retail
configurations in several cities. She found a number of the vibrant cities did not have office space and
were entirely retail. She encouraged the public to comment on the BD1 retail only proposal at next week’s
meeting.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Councilmember Fraley-Monillas, her son and her husband who
cooked dinner at the Edmonds Senior Center’s very successful auction.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked everyone who attended the Edmonds Senior Center auction.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the updated timeline for the Haines Wharf project and asked
how that matter will be concluded. Mayor Pro Tem Peterson responded the Council directed
Councilmember Bernheim and Mayor Cooper to develop next steps. Councilmember Bernheim has
indicated the information will be available by October 11 which is Council committee night. An update is
tentatively scheduled for the October 18 Council meeting.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was anxious to have the matter resolved and to provide citizens a
response prior to the election. Staff has provided a draft procedure for handling change orders in the
future. Mayor Pro Tem Peterson invited Councilmembers to contact him regarding their interest in
scheduling a special Council meeting on October 11.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Packet Page 13 of 253
AM-4239 Item #: 4. C.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Jim Tarte Submitted By:Nori Jacobson
Department:Finance
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Approve for Consent Agenda
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #127981 through #128135 dated September 29, 2011 for $331,695.17.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Approval of claim checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2011
Revenue:
Expenditure:331,695.17
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $331,695.17
Attachments
Claim Checks 9-29-11
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Jim Tarte 09/29/2011 08:40 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:05 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 09/29/2011 08:18 AM
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 14 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
127981 9/29/2011 073809 A TWIST OF KARMA ENTERTAINMENT OSMAN1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "DYNAMIC FLASH
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 334.00
PRESENTER: "HOW TO WRITE THAT SCRIPT"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :495.00
127982 9/29/2011 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 299459 13992
PEST CONTROL
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 165.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.410.23 15.67
Total :180.67
127983 9/29/2011 070628 ACHESON, ALICE ACHESON1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "PITCHES,
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 174.00
Total :174.00
127984 9/29/2011 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND OCTOBER 2011 ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 10/11 EDMONDS AC
ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 10/11
001.000.410.521.700.410.00 2,032.66
Total :2,032.66
127985 9/29/2011 071766 AQUA TREK KAYAK & MARINE CTR AQUATREK14656 BOWMAN BAY KAYAK TOUR
BOWMAN BAY KAYAK TOUR
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 434.70
Total :434.70
127986 9/29/2011 069751 ARAMARK 655-5751177 FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
FAC MAINT UNIFORM SVC655-5775275
1Page:
Packet Page 15 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
127986 9/29/2011 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
Fac Maint Uniform Svc
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 30.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.240.00 2.86
PW MATS655-5779849
PW MATS
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 1.01
PW MATS
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 3.84
PW MATS
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 3.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.410.00 0.37
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.410.00 0.34
STREET/STORM UNIFORM SVC655-5779850
Street Storm Uniform Svc
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 5.00
Street Storm Uniform Svc
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 5.00
2Page:
Packet Page 16 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
127986 9/29/2011 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.900.240.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 0.47
FLEET UNIFORM SVC655-5779852
Fleet Uniform Svc
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.240.00 0.95
Total :109.88
127987 9/29/2011 069751 ARAMARK 655-5775274 UNIFORM SERVICES
PARK MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 39.71
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.240.00 3.77
Total :43.48
127988 9/29/2011 069751 ARAMARK 655-5763139 21580001
UNIFORM SERVICE
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 70.93
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.240.00 6.74
Total :77.67
127989 9/29/2011 073794 ARSENAULT-BUCKHAM, MARY BUCKHAM1001 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "ACTIVE SETTINGS"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 159.00
Total :159.00
127990 9/29/2011 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 0223694-IN 01-7500014
DIESEL FUEL
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 2,569.39
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.320.00 244.09
3Page:
Packet Page 17 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :2,813.48127990 9/29/2011 071124 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM
127991 9/29/2011 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 61692 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #Printing 300
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 149.33
UB Outsourcing area #Printing 300
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 149.33
UB Outsourcing area #Printing 300
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 153.85
UB Outsourcing area #
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 485.14
UB Outsourcing area #
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 485.14
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.490.00 14.19
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.490.00 14.19
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.490.00 14.61
Total :1,465.78
127992 9/29/2011 073396 BARRETT, Q LINDSEY BARRETT1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "HOT, HOT, HOT"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
127993 9/29/2011 073793 BERTOLINO, JAMES BERTOLINO1002 PRESENTER & JUDGE FOR WOTS 2011
WOTS PRESENTER: CONTRARY IMPULSES
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 164.00
WOTS 2011 POETRY JUDGE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00
Total :289.00
127994 9/29/2011 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 400 ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
Annual Implementation Services
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 6,000.00
4Page:
Packet Page 18 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
127994 9/29/2011 (Continued)070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.620.558.800.410.00 570.00
Total :6,570.00
127995 9/29/2011 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 886516 INV#886516 - EDMONDS PD - ROSSI
BLUMENTHAL PATROL JACKET W/F
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 395.00
NAME TAGS - NJ ROSSI
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 9.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.240.00 38.47
Total :443.37
127996 9/29/2011 069085 BOND, KATHRYN BOND1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "WRITING THE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
127997 9/29/2011 073817 BOWERS, DOUGLAS TBD 92711 TBD Refund D Bowers
TBD Refund D Bowers
001.000.000.344.900.000.00 20.00
Total :20.00
127998 9/29/2011 073820 BRISSE, MATTHEW E0JA/E7JA.Seal Coat E0JA/E7JA.SEAL COAT AGREEMENT.BRISSE
E0JA/E7JA.Seal Coat Agreement.Brisse
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 810.65
Total :810.65
127999 9/29/2011 071434 BRUNETTE, SISSEL BRUNETTE14612 PRENATAL YOGA
PRENATAL YOGA !14612
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 196.00
Total :196.00
128000 9/29/2011 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 11311426 601079
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 85.80
5Page:
Packet Page 19 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :85.80128000 9/29/2011 073029 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
128001 9/29/2011 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 11296805 Lease/Plng Copier/Printer DSD
Lease/Plng Copier/Printer DSD
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 36.16
Total :36.16
128002 9/29/2011 070088 CASCADIA CONSULTING GROUP 2124 Energy Plan 2011 - Prof Svc
Energy Plan 2011 - Prof Svc
001.000.651.519.920.410.00 6,968.04
Total :6,968.04
128003 9/29/2011 068484 CEMEX LLC 9422205677 Roadway - Asphalt
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 280.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 26.61
Storm - Dump Fees9422212957
Storm - Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 173.60
Roadway - Asphalt9422266478
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 658.75
9.2% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.310.310.00 60.61
Total :1,199.57
128004 9/29/2011 073616 CFO SELECTIONS LLC 7586 Jim Tarte - Interim Fin Director
Jim Tarte - Interim Fin Director
001.000.310.514.230.410.00 5,875.00
Total :5,875.00
128005 9/29/2011 003515 CH2M HILL INC 3807489 E6MA.SERVICES THRU 8/26/11
E6MA.Services thru 8/26/11
129.000.240.595.700.410.00 2,734.85
Total :2,734.85
6Page:
Packet Page 20 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128006 9/29/2011 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 31465728 INV#31465728 ACCT#7898305185 EDMONDS PD
FUEL FOR NARCOTICS VEHICLE
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 435.72
CAR WASH NARCS VEHICLE 8/26/11
104.000.410.521.210.320.00 6.00
Total :441.72
128007 9/29/2011 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 8903 INV#8903 CUST#1655 - EDMONDS PD
VERIZON INTERNET-NARCS 08/11
104.000.410.521.210.420.00 43.01
Total :43.01
128008 9/29/2011 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 1-218359-27982 2203 N 205TH ST/METER 762972
2203 N 205TH ST
411.000.656.538.800.471.62 16.47
Total :16.47
128009 9/29/2011 073573 CLARK SECURITY PRODUCTS INC SE77047202 Fac Maint - Mortise Part
Fac Maint - Mortise Part
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.09
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.06
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.83
Fac Maint - City Stock - TumblersSE77838001
Fac Maint - City Stock - Tumblers
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 79.20
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.68
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.34
Total :140.20
128010 9/29/2011 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2355116 Fac Maint - Vac Filters, Liners, Seat
Fac Maint - Vac Filters, Liners, Seat
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 492.92
7Page:
Packet Page 21 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128010 9/29/2011 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 46.83
Total :539.75
128011 9/29/2011 070300 CODE 4 INC 9713 INV 9713 - EDMONDS PD - TRYKAR
DYNAMIC TESTIMONY-TRYKAR
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 99.00
TACTICAL SILENCE - TRYKAR
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 99.00
Total :198.00
128012 9/29/2011 069848 CRAM, KATHERINE CRAM14580 IRISH DANCE CLASSES
IRISH DANCE FOR KIDS #14580
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 62.40
IRISH DANCE #14582
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 22.10
Total :84.50
128013 9/29/2011 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 199479 Storm - Concrete Catch Basin Supplies
Storm - Concrete Catch Basin Supplies
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 232.28
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.400.310.00 22.07
Total :254.35
128014 9/29/2011 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 309469 E1AA.SERVICES THRU 8/27/11
E1AA.Services thru 8/27/11
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 11,360.88
Total :11,360.88
128015 9/29/2011 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16 152098 Unit 91 - Radio Supply
Unit 91 - Radio Supply
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 60.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 5.70
8Page:
Packet Page 22 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128015 9/29/2011 (Continued)061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 16
Unit 411 - Speaker kit43275
Unit 411 - Speaker kit
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 160.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 15.20
Total :240.90
128016 9/29/2011 047610 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE 41 JA6953 L009 E9DA.WSDOT REVIEW/APPROVE PLANS
E9DA.WSDOT Review/Approve Plans
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 440.33
Total :440.33
128017 9/29/2011 070324 DESTINY SOFTWARE 3109 YEARLY SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
Agenda Quick & Pub Rec. Software
001.000.250.514.300.480.00 2,722.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.480.00 193.38
Total :2,915.88
128018 9/29/2011 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 11-3228 MINUTE TAKING
City Council Minutes
001.000.250.514.300.410.00 624.00
Total :624.00
128019 9/29/2011 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 11-1908.1 E1FB.TASK ORDER 11-05 (COMPLETE)
E1FB.Task Order 11-05 (Complete)
412.200.630.594.320.410.00 2,368.00
Total :2,368.00
128020 9/29/2011 064485 DUBOIS, CHRISTINE DUBOIS1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 PRESENTER: "12 STEPS TO POWERFUL
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
128021 9/29/2011 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 LIFT STATION #11
LIFT STATION #11
9Page:
Packet Page 23 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128021 9/29/2011 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.50
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE3-03575
MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 217.37
LIFT STATION #123-07525
LIFT STATION #12
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 55.99
LIFT STATION #153-07709
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.50
LIFT STATION #43-09350
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 55.99
LIFT STATION #103-09800
LIFT STATION #10
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.50
LIFT STATION #93-29875
LIFT STATION #9
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 27.50
Total :439.35
128022 9/29/2011 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 6-01127 WWTP WATER
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 207.49
WWTP WATER6-01130
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 25.63
WWTP WATER6-01140
WWTP WATER
411.000.656.538.800.473.64 1,246.32
Total :1,479.44
128023 9/29/2011 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 097892 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT
Radix Monthly Maint Agreement -
411.000.654.534.800.480.00 152.00
10Page:
Packet Page 24 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :152.00128023 9/29/2011 031060 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP
128024 9/29/2011 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 069279 CUST# MK5533 C5051 GQM52286 COPIER
Meter charges 08/30/11 - 9/30/11 B&W,
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 30.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 2.89
Total :33.33
128025 9/29/2011 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 068929 A6898
COPIER CONTRACT
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 14.99
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.450.41 1.42
Total :16.41
128026 9/29/2011 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 068971 METER READING
Recept. desk 5/21 to 6/21
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 84.34
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 8.01
METER READING069283
9/30 to 10/30
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 195.94
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.450.00 18.61
Total :306.90
128027 9/29/2011 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 068972 Fleet- Printer Maint Fees for
Fleet- Printer Maint Fees for
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 16.53
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 1.57
Total :18.10
128028 9/29/2011 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 066896 Lease - Plng printer/copier
11Page:
Packet Page 25 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128028 9/29/2011 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
Lease - Plng printer/copier
001.000.620.558.800.450.00 45.99
Total :45.99
128029 9/29/2011 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU24010 Traffic Control - Socket Rail
Traffic Control - Socket Rail
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 10.89
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00 1.03
Total :11.92
128030 9/29/2011 066590 FELIX LLC, ROBERT W FELIX WEIGHT LOSS WITH HYPNOSIS
WEIGHT LOSS WITH HYPNOSIS #14517
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 996.80
Total :996.80
128031 9/29/2011 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 338653 TENANT #101706 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT
4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent for Oct-11
001.000.390.519.900.450.00 300.00
Total :300.00
128032 9/29/2011 011900 FRONTIER 425-775-2455 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM
PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE ALARM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 50.25
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM425-776-3896
FRANCES ANDERSON FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 110.80
Total :161.05
128033 9/29/2011 011900 FRONTIER 425 712-0423 AFTER HOURS PHONE
AFTER HOURS PHONE
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 56.76
Total :56.76
128034 9/29/2011 073821 GEODESIGN INC 26047 E1JA.SERVICES THRU 8/31/11
E1JA.Services thru 8/31/11
12Page:
Packet Page 26 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128034 9/29/2011 (Continued)073821 GEODESIGN INC
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 540.00
Total :540.00
128035 9/29/2011 073795 GOMPERTZ, RON GOMPERTZ1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "CREATING E-BOOKS
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 234.00
Total :234.00
128036 9/29/2011 073796 HARTWELL, ELENA HARTWELL1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "WRITING DIALOGUE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
128037 9/29/2011 071417 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 3665120 Storm - Dayton Storm Crossing Supplies
Storm - Dayton Storm Crossing Supplies
411.000.652.542.320.310.00 2,123.03
7.7% sales tax
411.000.652.542.320.310.00 163.48
Total :2,286.51
128038 9/29/2011 073797 HINN, EMILY HINN1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "ALL SMART
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
128039 9/29/2011 071318 HJELM, PAMELA HJELM0922 REFUND
REFUND DUE TO CANCELLED CLASS
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 51.00
Total :51.00
128040 9/29/2011 069952 HUGHES, HOLLY HUGHES0930 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRE-CONFERENCE POETRY
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 520.00
PRESENTER: "MAKING TIME TO WRITE IN A
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 106.00
13Page:
Packet Page 27 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :626.00128040 9/29/2011 069952 069952 HUGHES, HOLLY
128041 9/29/2011 073683 HUNTER, AMBER ROSE HUNTER0926 PRESCHOOL SUBSTITUTE
PRESCHOOL SUB: 9/26/11
001.000.640.575.560.410.00 32.50
Total :32.50
128042 9/29/2011 070742 HURLEY, DAN HURLEY0930 2011 WOTS WORKSHOP
2011 WOTS PRE-CONFERENCE FICTION
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 468.00
Total :468.00
128043 9/29/2011 072041 IBS INCORPORATED 492355-1 Fac Maint -Unit 95 Stock - Drill Bits
Fac Maint -Unit 95 Stock - Drill Bits
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 26.99
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 8.11
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.33
Total :38.43
128044 9/29/2011 070042 IKON 85578583 INV#85578583 ACCT#467070-1005305A3
COPIER RENTAL 09/13-10/12/11
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 340.00
ADDITIONAL IMAGES
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 283.57
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.100.450.00 59.23
Total :682.80
128045 9/29/2011 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 1946508 Return of office supplies - DSD
Return of office supplies - DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 -12.24
Office Supplies - DSD1946790
Office Supplies - DSD
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 82.62
14Page:
Packet Page 28 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :70.38128045 9/29/2011 073548 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
128046 9/29/2011 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 522065 54278825
HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION
411.000.656.538.800.310.53 3,552.14
Total :3,552.14
128047 9/29/2011 073400 JENSEN, JOANN JENSEN1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "TWITTER-PATED"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 284.00
Total :284.00
128048 9/29/2011 073814 JOHANSSON, MARC JOHANSSON0923 REFUND
REFUND OF MONEY FOR ART CONTEST
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 10.00
Total :10.00
128049 9/29/2011 067330 KAR-VEL CONSTRUCTION INC E0JA/E7JA.Pmt 5 E0JA/E7JA.PMT 5 THRU 9/20/11
E0JA/E7JA.Pmt 5 thru 9/20/11
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 170,915.16
E0JA/E7JA.Ret. 5
412.100.000.223.400.000.00 -7,804.35
Total :163,110.81
128050 9/29/2011 063923 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 403-00000122434 Water - Brushes
Water - Brushes
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 43.92
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 4.17
Total :48.09
128051 9/29/2011 073798 KOFFMAN, REBECCA KOFFMAN1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "POV BOOT CAMP"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 261.00
WOTS JUDGE FOR FICTION
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00
15Page:
Packet Page 29 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :386.00128051 9/29/2011 073798 073798 KOFFMAN, REBECCA
128052 9/29/2011 073799 KRUG, CHRISTINE KRUG1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 PRESENTER: "BURN WILD: CREATIVE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 234.00
Total :234.00
128053 9/29/2011 069083 LAMPHERE, KAREN LAMPHERE14645 COOLING INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD
COOLING INFLAMMATION WITH FOOD #14645
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 245.00
Total :245.00
128054 9/29/2011 073136 LANG, ROBERT LANG0925 PLAZA ROOM MONITOR
PLAZA ROOM MONITOR 9/25/11
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 180.00
Total :180.00
128055 9/29/2011 018140 LEIN, JONATHAN 0283 TRAINING/LEIN
TRAINING/LEIN
411.000.656.538.800.490.71 379.59
Total :379.59
128056 9/29/2011 073800 LEWARS, CORBIN LEWARS1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "WRITING YOUR
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
128057 9/29/2011 073801 LONG, PRISCILLA LONG1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "5 SECRETS OF
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
128058 9/29/2011 073802 LUND, DEBORAH LUND1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "PICTURE BOOKS:
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 159.00
Total :159.00
16Page:
Packet Page 30 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128059 9/29/2011 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 642297 Parks Dept. Helicoil supplies
Parks Dept. Helicoil supplies
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 37.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.800.310.00 3.61
Total :41.60
128060 9/29/2011 073815 MAKI, KIM MAKI0922 REFUND
REFUND FOR CANCELLED CLASS
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 64.00
Total :64.00
128061 9/29/2011 073803 MCCART, ALICIA MCCART1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "MAKE YOUR BOOK A
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 234.00
2011 WOTS JUDGE FOR NONFICTION
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 125.00
Total :359.00
128062 9/29/2011 072917 MCCORD, JENNIFER MCCORD1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS: PROVIDE UP TO 20 MANUSCRIPT
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 338.00
PRESENTER: "PATHS TO PUBLICATION"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 81.00
Total :419.00
128063 9/29/2011 072918 MCDONALD, BRIAN MCDONALD0930 2011 WOTS STORY WORKSHOP
2011 WOTS STORY WORKSHOP
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 482.00
Total :482.00
128064 9/29/2011 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 95339453 123106800
STAINLESS STEEL THREAD PIPE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 125.29
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 6.14
17Page:
Packet Page 31 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128064 9/29/2011 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
12310680095342428
ACCESS HATCH/INSULATION SHEETING
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 523.85
Freight
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 33.62
Total :688.90
128065 9/29/2011 071011 MIDCO-WEST INC 440003286 DISTRIBUTOR CAP/WIRE KIT/ROTOR ASY
DISTRIBUTOR CAP/WIRE KIT/ROTOR ASY
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 258.30
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 24.54
Total :282.84
128066 9/29/2011 073804 MILLER, BRENDA MILLER1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "MAKING TIME TO
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 111.00
Total :111.00
128067 9/29/2011 072223 MILLER, DOUG MILLER0911 SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT
SOFTBALL FIELD ATTENDANT~
001.000.640.575.520.410.00 160.00
Total :160.00
128068 9/29/2011 020905 MILLIMAN INC 003FPL091 ACTUARIAL SERVICES
Actuarial Services for FF Pension Fund
617.000.510.522.200.410.00 326.25
Actuarial Services for FF Pension Fund
009.000.390.517.370.410.00 798.75
Total :1,125.00
128069 9/29/2011 073805 MINER, ERICA MINER1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "JOURNALING:
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 361.00
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "SOLVE THE
18Page:
Packet Page 32 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128069 9/29/2011 (Continued)073805 MINER, ERICA
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :522.00
128070 9/29/2011 073806 MORRIS, REBECCA MORRIS1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "TELLING FACT
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
128071 9/29/2011 073807 MUELLER, NANCY MUELLER1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "TRAVEL WRITING
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
128072 9/29/2011 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 11-1196-8 E1JA.SERVICES THRU 8/31/11
E1JA.Services thru 8/31/11
412.100.630.594.320.410.00 2,820.53
Total :2,820.53
128073 9/29/2011 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0459436-IN Fleet - Filter Inventory
Fleet - Filter Inventory
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 113.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.340.40 10.78
Total :124.18
128074 9/29/2011 025140 NORTH PARK HEATING INC 20112831 FS 16 - Supply and Install Heat
FS 16 - Supply and Install Heat
116.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,638.00
9.5% Sales Tax
116.000.651.519.920.480.00 155.61
Total :1,793.61
128075 9/29/2011 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 42792 CITYEDMTRE
HOSE
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 39.50
9.2% Sales Tax
19Page:
Packet Page 33 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128075 9/29/2011 (Continued)025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS
411.000.656.538.800.310.21 3.63
Total :43.13
128076 9/29/2011 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 24743 260
SODIUM BISULFITE
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 893.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.54 84.85
Total :978.05
128077 9/29/2011 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 522992 PW Admin Supplies
PW Admin Supplies
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 10.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 0.99
Water/ Sewer Battery supply541601
Water/ Sewer Battery supply
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 55.60
Water/ Sewer Battery supply
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 55.60
PW Admin Supplies
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 24.41
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 5.28
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 5.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.650.519.910.310.00 2.32
Total :159.98
128078 9/29/2011 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 572056 INV#572056 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD
EXPO DRY ERASER SET
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 8.15
COMPUTER SCREEN GLARE FILTER
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 49.99
20Page:
Packet Page 34 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128078 9/29/2011 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.220.310.00 0.77
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.210.310.00 4.75
Total :63.66
128079 9/29/2011 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 441858 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 11.29
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 1.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES558847
Office Supplies
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 207.98
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.250.514.300.310.00 19.76
Total :240.10
128080 9/29/2011 073808 ORR, ALICE ORR0930 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS WORKSHOP: "MEMOIR: MENTORS,
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 482.00
PRESENTER: "DO IT ANYWAY GUIDE TO
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :616.00
128081 9/29/2011 073822 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO 3375-32328 E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22800 HWY 99
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22800 HWY 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22725 78TH AVE W3375-32329
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22725 78th Ave W
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
21Page:
Packet Page 35 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128081 9/29/2011 (Continued)073822 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 7728 228TH ST SW3375-32330
E7AC.Title Work Charge 7728 228th St Sw
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22800 76TH AVE W3375-32331
E7AC.Title Work Charge.22800 76th Ave W
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22901 HWY 993375-32332
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22901 HWY 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22807 76TH AVE W3375-32333
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22807 76th Ave W
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22721 76TH AVE W3375-32334
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22721 76TH AVE W
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22625 HWY 993375-32335
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22625 HWY 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22511 HWY 993375-32336
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22511 HWY 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
22Page:
Packet Page 36 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128081 9/29/2011 (Continued)073822 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE CO
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22510 76TH AVE W3375-32337
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22510 76th Ave W
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22430 HWY 993375-32338
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22430 Hwy 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
E7AC.TITLE WORK CHARGE 22727 HWY 993375-32339
E7AC.Title Work Charge 22727 Hwy 99
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 450.00
9.2% Sales Tax
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 41.40
Total :5,896.80
128082 9/29/2011 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 251534 Storm Dump Fees
Storm Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 420.00
Total :420.00
128083 9/29/2011 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.023020293 Sr Center - Primer
Sr Center - Primer
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 32.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.04
Sr Center - Paint Supplies023020390
Sr Center - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 6.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.61
Sr Center - Paint023020670
Sr Center - Paint
23Page:
Packet Page 37 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128083 9/29/2011 (Continued)027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 31.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.96
Sr Center - Paint Supplies023020777
Sr Center - Paint Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 41.97
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.99
Sr Center - Paint supplies023021099
Sr Center - Paint supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 51.23
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 4.87
Sr Center - Paint023021194
Sr Center - Paint
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 15.59
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 1.48
Total :195.36
128084 9/29/2011 071362 PEACHTREE BUSINESS PRODUCTS p252981900013 PARKING PERMITS
Employee Parking Permits
121.000.340.517.900.310.00 925.00
Total :925.00
128085 9/29/2011 069944 PECK, ELIZABETH PECK14414 PILATES MAT
PILATES MAT #14414
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 120.40
Total :120.40
128086 9/29/2011 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 27096.000-33 E7CB.SERVICES THRU 8/28/11
E7CB.Services thru 8/28/11
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 1,725.00
Total :1,725.00
24Page:
Packet Page 38 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128087 9/29/2011 073816 PETTERSON, TAMIE PETTERSON0922 REFUND
CLASS REFUND
001.000.000.239.200.000.00 114.00
Total :114.00
128088 9/29/2011 028400 PITNEY BOWES INC 397184 LETTER OPENER MAINTENANCE10/1/11-9/30/12
Maintenance contract letter opener
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 298.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.310.514.230.480.00 28.31
Total :326.31
128089 9/29/2011 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0117314 City Park - Elect Supplies
City Park - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 9.73
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 0.92
FAC - Lo-Volt MAgnetic Relay0226564
FAC - Lo-Volt MAgnetic Relay
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 179.08
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.01
Total :206.74
128090 9/29/2011 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 CITY OF EDMONDS STORMWATER
Pier StormWater Rent for
001.000.640.576.800.470.00 2,174.78
Total :2,174.78
128091 9/29/2011 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 MCC
24 hour Alarm Monitoring MCC
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 102.00
24 HOUR ALARM MONITORING -CITY HALL31146525
24 hour Alarm Monitoring-City Hall
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 39.74
Total :141.74
25Page:
Packet Page 39 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128092 9/29/2011 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756-1 Library - Upgrade Fire System
Library - Upgrade Fire System
116.000.651.519.920.480.00 1,149.80
Total :1,149.80
128093 9/29/2011 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET PROTZ14394 FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP
FELDENKRAIS WORKSHOP #14394
001.000.640.575.540.410.00 87.50
Total :87.50
128094 9/29/2011 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 0101874006 LIBRARY
LIBRARY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 42.55
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP0230757007
PARK & BUILDING MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 55.22
LIFT STATION #71916766007
LIFT STATION #7
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 33.81
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCIL2753166004
PUBLIC SAFETY-POLICE,CRT & COUNCEL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 278.22
Public Works2776365005
Public Works
001.000.650.519.910.470.00 5.03
Public Works
111.000.653.542.900.470.00 19.12
Public Works
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 19.12
Public Works
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 19.12
Public Works
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 19.12
Public Works
411.000.652.542.900.470.00 19.12
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg3689976003
26Page:
Packet Page 40 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128094 9/29/2011 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
200 Dayton St-Vacant PW Bldg
411.000.654.534.800.470.00 43.70
FLEET5903085008
Fleet 7110 210th St SW
511.000.657.548.680.470.00 37.95
FIRE STATION 17 PUBLIC SAFETY6439566008
FIRE STATION 17 PUBLIC SAFETY
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 142.83
ANDERSON CENTER6490327001
ANDERSON CENTER
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 500.34
LIFT STATION #88851908007
LIFT STATION #8
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 54.94
FIRE STATION #209919661109
FIRE STATION #20
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 59.34
Total :1,349.53
128095 9/29/2011 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 084-904-700-6 WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
WWTP PUGET SOUND ENERGY
411.000.656.538.800.472.63 42.13
Total :42.13
128096 9/29/2011 073818 RAFEL LAW GROUP 139983 REFUND OF PHOTOCOPY CHARGE
refund on overcharge
001.000.000.341.690.000.00 49.68
Refund Tax
001.000.000.237.110.000.00 4.72
Total :54.40
128097 9/29/2011 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 002730 Storm - Sweep Dump Fees
Storm - Sweep Dump Fees
411.000.652.542.320.490.00 339.30
27Page:
Packet Page 41 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :339.30128097 9/29/2011 062657 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
128098 9/29/2011 031600 RELIABLE FLOOR COVERINGS 116973 Sr Center - Supplies 240LF Roppe 6"
Sr Center - Supplies 240LF Roppe 6"
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 525.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 49.96
Total :575.86
128099 9/29/2011 071335 RHAMEY, RAY RHAMEY1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "KILLER FIRST
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 284.00
Total :284.00
128100 9/29/2011 073819 ROCK SOLID LEARNING LLC ROCKSOLID14652 MARVELOUS MINERALS
MARVELOUS MINERALS #14652
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 63.00
Total :63.00
128101 9/29/2011 073810 SCHUESSLER, ANN ROTH1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "HE SHOT THE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 161.00
Total :161.00
128102 9/29/2011 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC 1111838 Water - UB - #9 Courtesy Return Envelope
Water - UB - #9 Courtesy Return Envelope
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 111.10
Water - UB - #9 Courtesy Return Envelope
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 111.10
Water - UB - #9 Courtesy Return Envelope
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 111.10
Freight
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 15.12
Freight
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 15.12
Freight
28Page:
Packet Page 42 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128102 9/29/2011 (Continued)036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 15.12
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.310.00 11.99
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.310.00 11.99
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.310.00 11.99
Total :414.63
128103 9/29/2011 036955 SKY NURSERY 295511 FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES
FLOWER PROGRAM SUPPLIES
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 227.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.640.576.810.310.00 21.57
Total :248.67
128104 9/29/2011 073690 SMILEY-FAIRBANKS, MONA SMILEY-FAIRBANKS ARTIST SERVICES
INSTALLATION OF SHEET METAL FLOWERS @
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 100.00
Total :100.00
128105 9/29/2011 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200124873 SIGNAL LIGHT 9933 100TH W
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 46.07
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE200386456
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 80.17
LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT RD200468593
LIFT STATION #4
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 339.92
4 WAY LIGHT 101 9TH AVE S200592954
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 30.02
LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL W201265980
LIFT STATION #12
29Page:
Packet Page 43 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128105 9/29/2011 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 350.04
4 WAY LIGHT 599 MAIN ST201283892
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 52.13
LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH PL W201374964
LIFT STATION #11
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 32.39
SIGNAL LIGHT 660 EDMONDS WAY201563434
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 46.22
LS #15 7710 168TH PL SW201594488
LIFT STATION #15
411.000.655.535.800.470.00 31.04
DECO LIGHT 413 MAIN ST201656907
STREET LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 380.64
23190 100TH W SCHOOL CROSSWALK LITE201703758
23190 100th W School Crosswalk Lite
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 41.03
4 WAY LIGHT 901 WALNUT201782646
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.640.470.00 52.08
LIGHT 120 5TH N202389375
SIGNAL LIGHT
111.000.653.542.630.470.00 15.64
LOG CABIN202421582
LOG CABIN
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 90.09
CITY HALL202439246
CITY HALL
001.000.651.519.920.470.00 2,371.10
Total :3,958.58
128106 9/29/2011 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 143515955 2030-9778-7
WWTP ELECTRICITY
30Page:
Packet Page 44 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128106 9/29/2011 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
411.000.656.538.800.471.61 24,478.90
Total :24,478.90
128107 9/29/2011 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4188179-01 Storm - Work Jeans - B Clemens
Storm - Work Jeans - B Clemens
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 77.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.652.542.900.240.00 7.32
Total :84.32
128108 9/29/2011 073787 SOUTH COUNTY PLUMBING BLD2011.0697 Permit voided/ mechanical permit
Permit voided/ mechanical permit
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 305.00
Total :305.00
128109 9/29/2011 063599 SPEEDY SIGN CENTER BLD2011.0755 Applicant withdrew application
Applicant withdrew application
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 75.00
Void/Permit not required.bld20110756
Void/Permit not required.
001.000.000.257.620.000.00 140.00
Total :215.00
128110 9/29/2011 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO Oct 2011 Standard OCTOBER 2011 STANDARD INSURANCE
October Standard Insurance premiums
811.000.000.231.550.000.00 13,371.81
Total :13,371.81
128111 9/29/2011 060371 STANDARD INSURANCE CO 00 637479 LTD premiums for 3rd qtr 2011
LTD premiums for 3rd qtr 2011
001.000.220.516.100.410.00 121.50
Total :121.50
128112 9/29/2011 073811 STEBBINS, SHERYL STEBBINS1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "PATHS TO
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 581.00
31Page:
Packet Page 45 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128112 9/29/2011 (Continued)073811 STEBBINS, SHERYL
PRESENTER: "PROVIDE UP TO 20
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 338.00
Total :919.00
128113 9/29/2011 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2587639 PS - Elect Supplies
PS - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 34.65
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 3.29
Library - Elect Suppleis2588988
Library - Elect Suppleis
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 614.15
Freight
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 83.75
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 66.30
Fac Maint - Elect Supplies2598665
Fac Maint - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 825.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 78.45
FS 16 - Elect Supplies2607124
FS 16 - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 13.77
FAC - Elect Supplies
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 17.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.651.519.920.310.00 2.92
Total :1,740.11
128114 9/29/2011 070864 SUPERMEDIA LLC 440011136303 C/A 430001405909
P&R Directory Listing
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 132.50
C/A 440001304654440011138146
Basic e-commerce hosting 9/2/11 -
32Page:
Packet Page 46 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128114 9/29/2011 (Continued)070864 SUPERMEDIA LLC
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 34.95
Domain forwarding 8/22/11 - 9/21/11
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 2.00
C/A 440001307733440011138171
09/2011 Web Hosting for Internet
001.000.310.518.880.420.00 34.95
Total :204.40
128115 9/29/2011 072555 SYSTEMS DESIGN WEST LLC ED0911 AUG-11 POSTAGE FOR AMBULANCE BILLINGS
EMS Billings Services - Postage Private
001.000.390.526.100.420.00 1.32
Total :1.32
128116 9/29/2011 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 12959 Water - Seattle Intertie - Service
Water - Seattle Intertie - Service
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 511.80
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.410.00 48.62
Total :560.42
128117 9/29/2011 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 56535 Water Sewer - Uniform Garment
Water Sewer - Uniform Garment
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 161.00
Water Sewer - Uniform Garment
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 161.00
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.654.534.800.240.00 15.30
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.655.535.800.240.00 15.29
Total :352.59
128118 9/29/2011 073792 TERRA COMMUNICATIONS INC TERRA1001 WOTS KEYNOTE LECTURE/BOOK SIGNING
WOTS 2011 KEYNOTE LECTURE AND BOOK
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 2,481.30
Total :2,481.30
33Page:
Packet Page 47 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128119 9/29/2011 072469 THOMAS, KIM THOMAS1011 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS ON SITE OPERATIONS ASSISTANCE
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 350.00
Total :350.00
128120 9/29/2011 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 18216 Unit 15 - Hide-a-key
Unit 15 - Hide-a-key
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 3.95
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.657.548.680.310.00 0.38
Total :4.33
128121 9/29/2011 073581 TRUAX, KAILEY TRUAX0924 GYM MONITOR FOR DANCE CLASSES
GYM MONITOR FOR SATURDAY NIGHT DANCE
001.000.640.574.100.410.00 24.00
Total :24.00
128122 9/29/2011 069592 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS U0298897I INV#U0298897I - EDMONDS PD
PAGER SERVICE 09/27 TO 10/26/11
001.000.410.521.100.420.00 47.52
Total :47.52
128123 9/29/2011 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 1012124915 C/A 671247844-00001
Cell Service-Bldg
001.000.620.524.100.420.00 97.16
Cell Service-Eng
001.000.620.532.200.420.00 166.83
Cell Service Fac-Maint
001.000.651.519.920.420.00 78.05
Cell Service-Parks Discovery Program
001.000.640.574.350.420.00 13.48
Cell Service Parks Maint
001.000.640.576.800.420.00 58.87
Cell Service-PD
001.000.410.521.220.420.00 462.24
Cell Service-PW Street
34Page:
Packet Page 48 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128123 9/29/2011 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
111.000.653.542.900.420.00 27.85
Cell Service-PW Storm
411.000.652.542.900.420.00 26.78
Cell Service-WWTP
411.000.656.538.800.420.00 40.14
Cell Service-PW Water
411.000.654.534.800.420.00 107.04
Cell Service-PW Sewer
411.000.655.535.800.420.00 50.96
Total :1,129.40
128124 9/29/2011 069836 VOLT SERVICE GROUP 25752256 Alecia Cox - clerical services (w/e
Alecia Cox - clerical services (w/e
001.000.650.519.910.410.00 839.20
Total :839.20
128125 9/29/2011 069380 WASHINGTON CHAPTER FBINAA 10/11/11 CLASS MENTOR ACROSS GENDER LINES-TRYKAR-EDMOND
MENTOR ACROSS GENDER LINES - TRYKAR
001.000.410.521.400.490.00 50.00
Total :50.00
128126 9/29/2011 045912 WASPC 2011-00639 INV 2011-00639 EDMONDS PD - LAWLESS
2011 ASSOCIATE DUES - LAWLESS
001.000.410.521.100.490.00 75.00
Total :75.00
128127 9/29/2011 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 5234 INV#5234 - EDMONDS PD
2,000 FIR CARDS
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 114.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.410.521.110.310.00 10.83
Total :124.83
128128 9/29/2011 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 5224 500 2 part NCR sets - Just a Reminder
500 2 part NCR sets - Just a Reminder
35Page:
Packet Page 49 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128128 9/29/2011 (Continued)073552 WELCO SALES LLC
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 268.28
500 2 part NCR Notice to Permittee -5225
500 2 part NCR Notice to Permittee -
001.000.620.558.800.310.00 273.75
Total :542.03
128129 9/29/2011 073739 WH PACIFIC INC 37306-03 E9DA.SERVICES THRU 9/4/11
E9DA.Services thru 9/4/11
112.200.630.595.330.410.00 5,628.45
Total :5,628.45
128130 9/29/2011 073812 WHITE, PATRICIA WHITE1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "ELEMENTS OF A
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 134.00
Total :134.00
128131 9/29/2011 064234 WILDWATER RIVER TOURS INC AMUNDSON14319 TIETON WHITEWATER RAFTING
TIETON WHITEWATER RAFTING #14319
001.000.640.574.200.410.00 109.58
Total :109.58
128132 9/29/2011 071343 WINGATE, SUSAN WINGATE1001 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENTER: "WUCHU SAY?"
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 174.00
Total :174.00
128133 9/29/2011 070123 WOODARD, MARCIA WOODARD 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRE CONFERENCE NONFICTION
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 364.00
Total :364.00
128134 9/29/2011 073813 WRIGHT, KAREN WRIGHT1002 2011 WOTS PRESENTER
2011 WOTS PRESENER: "BLOCKHEAD:
117.100.640.573.100.410.00 261.00
Total :261.00
36Page:
Packet Page 50 of 253
09/29/2011
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
7:53:07AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :front
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
128135 9/29/2011 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 939 SEPT-11 RETAINER
September 2011 Retainer
001.000.360.515.230.410.00 13,000.00
Total :13,000.00
Bank total :331,695.17155 Vouchers for bank code :front
331,695.17Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report155
37Page:
Packet Page 51 of 253
AM-4235 Item #: 4. D.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Linda Hynd
Department:City Clerk's Office
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of a Claim for Damages submitted by Roberta Lynn Sanitate ($56,742.68)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge receipt of the Claim for Damages by minute entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Roberta Lynn Sanitate
17213 A Gravenstein Road
Bothell, WA 98012
($56,742,68)
Attachments
Sanitate Claim for Damages
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Linda Hynd Started On: 09/27/2011 03:29 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 52 of 253
Packet Page 53 of 253
Packet Page 54 of 253
AM-4237 Item #: 4. E.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Gerry Gannon
Department:Police Department
Committee:Public Safety Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Interlocal Agreement between Snohomish County and the City of Edmonds relating to prisoner transport.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Staff recommends that Council approve the ILA authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement between
the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County Corrections.
Previous Council Action
The Public Safety/Human Resource Committee approved the the ILA for the October 4, 2011, Council
Meeting consent agenda.
Narrative
Until 2010, the department had an agreement with Whatcom County for prisoner transport. Due to
budget cuts Whatcom County could no longer provide this service in 2011. This service saved the
department from having an officer leave the the city to pick up a prisoner and then transporting the
prisoner to Snohomish County Jail. Transporting a prisoner could take an officer out of service for one
and one half hours or longer.
Snohomish County Corrections continued the service in 2011 without costs to it's contract agencies. To
continue to provide prisoner transport services in 2012, it is necessary for the Snohomish County
Corrections to charge for their transport services. Snohomish County Corrections found that it cost
Whatcom County about $93.00 per inmate to provide the prisoner transport service. Snohomish County
Corrections will be able to provide the same service for $50.00 per inmate. This is not a new cost to the
department, but continuation of our current prisoner costs. In researching the cost per transport this ILA,
if approved will save the City a significant amount of money for transporting prisoners between jail
facilities.
The City Attorney has approved the ILA as to form.
Attachments
ILA Prisoner Transport
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/28/2011 04:54 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Gerry Gannon Started On: 09/28/2011
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 55 of 253
Packet Page 56 of 253
Packet Page 57 of 253
Packet Page 58 of 253
Packet Page 59 of 253
Packet Page 60 of 253
Packet Page 61 of 253
Packet Page 62 of 253
AM-4234 Item #: 5.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:5 Minutes
Submitted For:Mayor Cooper Submitted By:Frances Chapin
Department:Parks and Recreation
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Information
Information
Subject Title
Proclamation in recognition of October as National Arts & Humanities Month.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
For information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Edmonds is known in our region as an "arts community". The people of Edmonds are generous in
their support of the arts, and over 30 talented cultural organizations call Edmonds their home. This
list includes the Cascade Symphony, Cascade Youth Symphony, Driftwood Theater, Edmonds Arts
Festival and Arts Festival Foundation, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Edmonds Historical Museum,
Gallery North, Olympic Ballet Theatre, and Sno-King Chorale. In addition the city is home to a rich
variety of arts related businesses and numerous artists who work in visual, performing and literary arts.
The City of Edmonds Arts Commission works on behalf of the City to foster the literary, performing and
visual arts with programs including the free Summer Concerts, the Write on the Sound writers’
conference on the first weekend in October, the City Public Art collection and ongoing exhibits by
regional artists. The Edmonds Arts Commission is also engaged at many levels in cultural
planning, fostering cultural tourism, and ensuring that art elements enhance developments in the public
realm.
The proclamation is an opportunity to urge citizens to reflect on the benefits of the arts to Edmonds and
the many opportunities to experience a broad array of cultural events throughout October and all year
long. The value and importance of culture in the lives of Americans has been celebrated for over two
decades through the proclamation at national, state, and local levels of Arts and Humanities Month in
October. The proclamation commemorates the efforts of millions of people in our country, including the
many arts organizations and individuals in Edmonds, who work to make the arts and humanities a part of
everyone’s life while contributing to our economic vitality and enhancing education for our youth.
Attachments
Edmonds Art Facts
Proclamation - Arts & Humanities Month
Packet Page 63 of 253
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:05 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Frances Chapin Started On: 09/27/2011
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 64 of 253
Edmonds supports Arts & Humanities!
Art Facts:
• Edmonds is home to over 160 arts-related businesses (including 9 galleries, 3 dance schools, 4 theaters, and
over 15 nonprofit cultural organizations) that employ over 500 people;
• Ten of Edmonds’ cultural organizations were established over 30 years ago, four over 50 years ago.
• Thirty-plus downtown Edmonds businesses participate monthly in the Third Thursday Art Walk attracting
approximately 3000 visitors a year;
• Over 50,000 people attend the regionally popular Edmonds Arts Festival every Father’s Day weekend featuring
240 artist booths, over 500 juried works, and a juried student exhibit of 1,000 artworks;
• The Edmonds Arts Festival and Foundation has funded four major public art installations for the City of
Edmonds worth over $350,000 – “Seeing Whales” by Richard Beyer, “Cedar Dreams” by Benson Shaw, “Beach
Launch” by Robert Cooke, and “Locals” by Georgia Gerber, and has contributed to many other art projects as
well as assisting the Arts Commission with funding arts maintenance;
• From 250 to 600 people of all ages gather on the grass at City Park on Sunday afternoons in July and August
for the free Arts Commission Concerts in the Park;
• Over 50,000 people annually attend events at the Edmonds Center for the Arts, including performances by
Edmonds based arts organizations Cascade Symphony, Olympic Ballet and Sno-King Chorale;
• In the 2010-11 Season, the Driftwood Players put on 98 performances of 14 different shows with a total
attendance of over 13,400 patrons;
• Over 30 artists in the Sculptor’s Workshop co-op put on two pottery sales a year attracting hundreds of visitors;
• Visual art exhibits curated by the Edmonds Arts Commission and Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation in public
spaces draw an estimated 8,000 viewers a year;
• Edmonds hosts the annual Frank DeMiero Jazz Festival and the Jazz Connection events, celebrating the talents
of hundreds of young musicians and featuring top jazz musicians from around the country;
• The Edmonds Historic Museum collection of historic images has over 5,500 photographs, mostly of Edmonds;
• Over 200 individual artists belong to ArtistsConnect, with monthly meetings hosted at Art Works;
• Twenty-one studios with 42 artists for the 2011 Edmonds Art Studio Tour welcomed hundreds of visitors;
• Since being established in 2009 the Edmonds Mural Society has raised private funds to create 11 murals in
downtown Edmonds;
• The door count at the Edmonds Library was 241,609 last year, and 467,048 items were circulated, a 4.7%
increase from the previous year;
• Over 250 people come from throughout the NW and as far away as New Zealand on the first weekend of
October to attend the 2 ½ day Write on the Sound writers’ conference, presented by Edmonds Arts Commission;
• The Friends of the Edmonds Library (200+ members) organize the annual Friends of the Library Book Sale at
the end of October (Oct 29, 2011) which draws hundreds of people who buy thousands of books for reuse.
Packet Page 65 of 253
Packet Page 66 of 253
AM-4236 Item #: 6.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted For:Councilwoman Petso Submitted By:Jana Spellman
Department:City Council
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Information
Information
Subject Title
Update from the Edmonds Center for the Arts/Public Facilities District - Third Quarter
2011.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Joe McIalwain, Executive Director of Edmonds Center for the Arts, will make a presentation about
current operations at the center. He will be joined by Mike Popke, General Manager of Lynnwood Honda
and a member of the Public Facilities District Board.
Attachments
ECA Presentation to Council
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:05 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 09/28/2011 08:36 AM
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 67 of 253
Packet Page 68 of 253
•Activities, Impact of ECA
•Recent Successes
•Current Financial Position -Operations
•Current Financial Position -Debt Service
•Next Steps
Introduction
Packet Page 69 of 253
•A cultural asset for Edmonds, and preserved an
important piece of Edmonds history –original Edmonds
High School and Edmonds Junior High campus;
•A beautiful and highly regarded venue for quality
performing arts events and concerts close to home;
•A state-of-the-art theatre for arts organizations from
around the region to use for performances and events;
•A Center that is active year-round not only with theatre
events, but also sports activities, classes, meetings, etc.;
•An important resource for teachers and students as
school arts programs suffer crippling budget cuts
We Have Created…
Packet Page 70 of 253
•505 events in the theatre to date
•50,500 people impacted by ECA each year
•2010 –2011 Season Statistics
–31% of audience from Edmonds
–18% of audience from Seattle
–Snohomish (9%), Lynnwood (8%), Bothell (4%),
Mill Creek (4%), Everett (3%), Mountlake Terrace (2%)
•$3 Million annual economic impact
•100+ volunteers support ECA annually
–Board members, ushers, admin., special event support
Impact of ECA
Packet Page 71 of 253
•ECA opened its 5th Anniversary Season with two
performances by Lily Tomlin on Saturday, October 1st.
•Cascade Symphony Orchestra celebrating the opening
of its 50th Anniversary Season with two performances -
October 23rd and 24th. (To be filmed and broadcast)
•Sno-King Community Chorale opens its new season on
November 10th with its annual “Salute to America”
concert in celebration of Veteran’s Day.
•ECA Presents: Christopher Cross –10/8; Orla Fallon –
10/14; Riders in the Sky –10/16; Magic School Bus
(Student Matinees only) –10/16; Bill Charlap & Renee
Rosnes (part of Earshot Jazz Festival) –10/29.
Current/Upcoming Events
Packet Page 72 of 253
•$180,000 in ticket sales by opening night of the 2011-
2012 Season (compared to $110,000 in sales by
opening night last season).
•Revenue from “Arts Crush” increased by more than
$75,000 this year.
•Rick Steves’ investment in ECA and Cascade
Symphony Orchestra -$100,000 per year for 10 years
beginning in 2012. Net revenue to ECA projected to be
between $50k and $60k each year.
Recent Successes
Packet Page 73 of 253
Operating Performance
Revenue
Ticket Sales
Rental Revenue
Other Earned Revenue
Fundraising for Operations
Total
Expense
Labor
Facilities/Operations
Programming
Other Expenses
Total
Net Revenue
2011
Budget
$ 430,000
$ 328,820
$ 87,000
$ 402,000
$1,247,820
$ 521,800
$ 232,400
$ 253,000
$ 238,300
$1,245,500
$ 2,320
2011
YTD (Aug)
$ 320,404
$ 241,471
$ 42,446
$ 337,201
$ 941,522
$ 347,564
$ 167,250
$ 214,079
$ 108,068
$ 836,961
$ 104,561
2010
Year-End
$ 304,152
$ 305,863
$ 46,627
$ 446,740
$1,103,380
$ 495,213
$ 255,139
$ 236,652
$ 159,547
$1,146,550
($43,170)
Packet Page 74 of 253
•A) Direct Local-Level Sales Tax Rebate
–Intended to cover a portion of the 2002 Bond Issue
–Economic crisis has resulted in a significant reduction in
revenues from this source.
•B) “TIER 1” County-Level Sales Tax Rebate
–Intended to cover the remainder of the 2002 Bond Issue
•C) “TIER 2” County-Level Sales Tax Rebate
–Intended to cover 2008 Bond Issue
–Revenues were projected to exceed $200,000 Annually
–Economic crisis has resulted in a 90% reduction in
revenues from the “Tier 2” stream
–Unrealized funding source, primary cause of capital
revenue shortfall
Sales Tax Revenue Streams
Packet Page 75 of 253
Capital Revenue / Expense
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Estimated Revenues and Expenditures
Year
District Sales
Tax Revenues
Projected (1)*
District Sales
Tax
Revenues
Actual (2)*
“Tier 1” Sno.
Co. PFD Sales
Tax Revenues -
Fixed (3)
“Tier 2” Sno.
Co. PFD Sales
Tax Revenues
Projected (4)
“Tier 2” Sno.
Co. PFD Sales
Tax Revenues
Actual (5)*
Debt Service -
2008 Bonds (6)
Debt Service -
2002 Bonds (7)
Net Revenue
Projected (8)
Net Revenue
Actual (9)
2008 $ 249,112 $ 190,836 $ 185,201 $ 314,695 $ -$ 65,658 $ 359,036 $ 324,314 $ (48,657)
2009 266,422 173,476 195,025 185,592 249,999 212,533 370,536 $ 63,970 $ 35,431
2010 275,747 173,913 205,146 193,052 14,849 275,833 381,368 $ 16,744 $ (263,292)
2011 285,398 179,478 215,575 200,784 12,625 286,370 396,493 $ 18,895 $ (275,184)
2012 295,387 185,222 226,320 208,911 12,830 296,270 410,493 $ 23,855 $ (282,391)
2013 305,725 191,149 237,390 217,216 17,123 310,533 424,118 $ 25,681 $ (288,988)
2014 316,426 197,265 248,796 225,937 17,420 318,945 436,803 $ 35,411 $ (292,266)
2015 327,500 203,578 260,548 234,969 17,810 326,295 453,298 $ 43,425 $ (297,657)
*(1): Actual District Sales Tax Revenue in 2007 was $232,669. Starting figure for 2008 projected 7% growth over 2007.
Conservative 3.5% annual growth was projected for all subsequent years.
*(2): Projected at 3.2% annual growth beginning in 2011.
*(5): Projections taken directly from Sno Co PFD Revenue Planning Model -Revised January, 2011.
Packet Page 76 of 253
EPFD Debt Service
Revenues
EPFD Local Sales Tax (estimated)
SCPFD Allocation #1
SCPFD Allocation #2
Total Revenues
Bond Payments Due
Net Balance
2011
$179,478
$215,575
$ 12,625
$407,678
$682,863
($275,185)
2012
$185,222
$226,320
$ 12,830
$424,372
$706,763
($282,391)
Remaining Principal, 2002 Bond Issue: $5,820,000
Remaining Principal, 2008 Bond Issue: $3,735,000
Combined Total:$9,555,000
Packet Page 77 of 253
EPFD Debt Service
•Because projected County sales tax revenues have not
materialized, additional funds will be needed in 2011 to
help cover a portion of EPFD’s bond debt.
•City Support -June 2011: $83,185 (received)
•ECA projected to contribute approximately $45,000 from
its operating fund for debt service.
•Estimated City Support –December 2011: $145,000
•Total Estimated City Support for FY 2011: $228,185
Packet Page 78 of 253
Long-Term Strategies
•City Council Members, Edmonds PFD Board Members,
ECA Board Members, City Staff and ECA Staff continue
to work together to find solutions.
•Task Force Includes:
•Lora Petso, DJ Wilson –City Council
•John McGibbon, Bob Rinehart –PFD Board
•Jack Loos, Steve Shelton –ECA Board
•Frances Chapin, Stephen Clifton, Carrie Hite,–City Staff
•Joe McIalwain –ECA Staff
Packet Page 79 of 253
Long-Term Strategies
•Long-Term Strategies:
•Refunding of 2002 Bonds –part of City refunding package
•Estimated savings of $30,000 per year
•Extension of PFD Legislation –statewide PFD effort
•Naming Rights -Exploring now with potential partners.
•Impact of Economic Recovery -unknown
•Improved Operating Performance –portion of net revenues
dedicated to debt service
Packet Page 80 of 253
•Completion of 2010 Audit (site work complete)
•Establishment of Term Limits for PFD Board Members
•Strategic Planning Process –2011-2012
Next Steps
Packet Page 81 of 253
THANK YOU
Packet Page 82 of 253
AM-4244 Item #: 7.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted By:Diane Cunningham
Department:Planning
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Recommend Review by Full
Council
Type:Information
Information
Subject Title
Hearing Examiner's Annual Report.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Olbrechts & Associates PLLC has served as the Hearing Examiner since February 2011 and this will be
their first annual report. Phil Olbrechts will provide an oral presentation.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 03:54 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/30/2011 09:27 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:47 AM
Form Started By: Diane Cunningham Started On: 09/29/2011 03:45 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/30/2011
Packet Page 83 of 253
AM-4243 Item #: 8.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted For:Jim Tarte Submitted By:Jim Tarte
Department:Finance
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Information
Information
Subject Title
Presentation of the 2012 Preliminary Budget.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
For your review
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
The Mayor will present the 2012 Preliminary Budget with opening comments.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 03:43 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/30/2011 09:27 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:47 AM
Form Started By: Jim Tarte Started On: 09/29/2011 03:29 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/30/2011
Packet Page 84 of 253
AM-4240 Item #: 9.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted By:Robert English
Department:Engineering
Review
Committee:
Community/Development Services Committee
Action:
Recommend Review by Full
Council
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Public hearing on the Capital Facilities Plan Element Update for 2012-2017 to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The proposal updates the City's
Capital Facilities Plan to include improvements, additions, upgrades or extensions of City
infrastructure such as transportation, parks and stormwater along with other public
facilities necessary to implement the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Add a Public Market Facility project in the Downtown Waterfront Area to the 2012-2017 Capital
Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program and approve both documents.
Previous Council Action
On September 13, 2011, the CS/DS Committee reviewed this item and recommended it be presented to
Council for discussion.
On September 27, 2011, the proposed 2012-2017 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement
Program were presented to the Council for review and discussion.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six-year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
In November 2010, the City Council approved the 2011-2016 CIP with an amendment to add a Public
Market Facility in the Downtown Waterfront Area as part of the 2012-2017 CIP process. The amendment
specified that the project would not have a cost, but no direction was provided on which Capital City
Fund the project should be added to. Staff's recommendation is to add the project to the Parks CFP and
the 125 REET-2 Parks Improvement Fund in the CIP. Staff is requesting direction from the City Council,
so the project can be added to both plans.
The proposed CFP and CIP were presented to the Planning Board on September 28, 2011 and a public
hearing was held, but no public comments were received. The Planning Board recommended the CFP
and CIP be forwarded to the City Council for approval and that their recommendation include the
Packet Page 85 of 253
following concerns:
1. It is important to make sure money is not wasted in the area of drainage and infrastructure in the
downtown waterfront area. These problems need to be resolved long term in order for redevelopment to
take place.
2. The Five Corners roundabout is a reoccurring community concern. It was brought up during the Five
Corners Neighborhood Activity Center Study. At that time, a video was provided to illustrate how a
roundabout operates, and preliminary sketches were provided to illustrate the land that would need to be
acquired to accommodate the roundabout. Even with the information provided, there was still a
significant amount of controversy.
3. A public education program is necessary to help the public understand the benefits of a roundabout
and to gain support for the project.
The draft minutes from the Planning Board meeting are attached as Exhibit 4.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are
restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The 2012-2017 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of General,
Transportation and Stormwater. The 2012-2017 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP has two sections
related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's financial fund
numbers. Exhibit 3 shows the projects that have been added or deleted in the 2012-2017 CFP and CIP.
Attachments
Exhibit 1 - CFP (2012-2017)
Exhibit 2 - CIP (2012-2017)
Exhibit 3 - CFP-CIP Comparison (2010 to 2011)
Exhibit 4 - Sept 28th Planning Board Minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering Robert English 09/29/2011 04:37 PM
Public Works Phil Williams 09/29/2011 04:59 PM
Parks and Recreation Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:05 AM
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:05 AM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/30/2011 09:27 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:47 AM
Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 09/29/2011 11:14 AM
Final Approval Date: 09/30/2011
Packet Page 86 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT
2012-2017
1Packet Page 87 of 253
2Packet Page 88 of 253
CFP
GENERAL
3Packet Page 89 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Pa
r
k
s
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
a
n
d
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
To
t
a
l
$5
-
$
2
3
M
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
$3
0
,
0
0
0
R
E
E
T
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$5
M
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
To
t
a
l
$5
M
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
R
E
E
T
1
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
To
t
a
l
Un
k
n
o
w
n
Li
b
r
a
r
y
/
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
C
i
t
y
G
.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
To
t
a
l
Un
k
n
o
w
n
$0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
C
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
R
E
E
T
2
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
5
5
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$2
,
0
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
6-
8
M
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
To
t
a
l
$3
-
$
4
M
Pu
b
l
i
c
V
o
t
e
/
G
r
a
n
t
s
Un
k
n
o
w
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
G.
O
.
B
o
n
d
s
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
To
t
a
l
$4
-
1
0
M
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
/
US
D
O
T
EI
S
St
a
t
e
F
u
n
d
s
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
To
t
a
l
Un
k
n
o
w
n
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$4
,
5
8
5
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$
2
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
`
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
/
S
n
o
-
I
s
l
e
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
Ex
p
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
S
n
o
-
I
s
l
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pl
a
n
)
.
20
1
5
Ar
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
/
A
r
t
M
u
s
e
u
m
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
e
w
c
e
n
t
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
A
r
t
'
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(C
i
t
y
h
a
s
l
e
a
s
e
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
.
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
W
S
D
O
T
F
e
r
r
y
/
M
u
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
Re
l
o
c
a
t
e
f
e
r
r
y
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l
t
o
M
a
r
i
n
a
Be
a
c
h
.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
/
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
n
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
.
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Re
p
l
a
c
e
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
d
e
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
.
Pa
r
k
s
&
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
&
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
/
A
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
-
Ol
d
W
o
o
d
w
a
y
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
In
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
E
S
D
#
1
5
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
a
t
h
l
e
t
i
c
co
m
p
l
e
x
.
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Re
p
l
a
c
e
/
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
(C
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
s
u
b
l
e
a
s
e
d
o
n
C
i
v
i
c
Pl
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
u
n
t
i
l
2
0
2
1
)
.
Bo
y
s
&
G
i
r
l
s
C
l
u
b
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Me
e
t
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
n
e
e
d
s
f
o
r
a
n
A
q
u
a
t
i
c
s
Ce
n
t
e
r
(
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
u
d
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Au
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
9
)
.
Ci
v
i
c
P
l
a
y
f
i
e
l
d
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
20
1
7
20
1
4
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
20
1
6
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
_
C
F
P
9/
2
9
/
2
0
1
1
4Packet Page 90 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Center
at Yost Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 –
$23,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5m - $23m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
5Packet Page 91 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Art Center / Art Museum ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,030,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A new Art Center/Museum facility will provide and promote
Cultural / Arts facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts
facilities is a high priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001
and in the 2008 update process.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for
public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority
creates the need to determine feasibility for and potentially construct new visual arts related
facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study $30,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000 $5,000,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
6Packet Page 92 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Boys & Girls Club Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build new Boys & Girls Club facility to accommodate the growing
and changing needs of this important club.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Boys & Girls Club was constructed as a field
house by the Edmonds School District decades ago and is in need of major renovation or
replacement. It is inadequate in terms of ADA accessibility and does not meet the needs of a
modern club.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
7Packet Page 93 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Civic Playfield Acquisition ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire this 8.1 acre property for continued use as an important
community park and site of some of Edmonds largest and most popular special events in
downtown Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Gain tenure and control in perpetuity over this important
park site for the citizens of Edmonds.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL Unknown
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
8Packet Page 94 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds/Sno-Isle Library ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand building/parking to accommodate additional library needs
and programs. Library improvements identified in Sno-Isle Libraries Capital Facility Plan:
2007-2025
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements will better serve citizens needs requiring
additional space and more sophisticated technology.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL Unknown
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
9Packet Page 95 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,000,000-
$8,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop regional community park and fully lighted multi-field athletic
complex. Development contingent upon successful partnerships, grants, and regional capital
campaign.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Currently underutilized and under maintained facility with
great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt,
parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000
residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study $2,055,000 $100,000 $2,200,000 $200,000
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $2,055,000 $100,000 $2,200,000 $200,000 $6m - $8m
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
10Packet Page 96 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities
Maintenance & Operations Building
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $3m - $4m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
11Packet Page 97 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4 – 10 mil.
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace and enlarge deteriorating Senior Center building
complex on the City waterfront.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This facility is at the end of its useful life. The floors
are continuing to settle which poses significant renovation costs. In addition, the facility
requires structural reinforcement to withstand a major earthquake.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on procuring the necessary funding from grants and other
sources.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $4m -$10m
12Packet Page 98 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing
WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will provide
the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms
of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between existing and
planned transportation modes.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2025
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-
2025
Engineering &
Administration
Right of Way
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
13Packet Page 99 of 253
14Packet Page 100 of 253
CFP
TRANSPORTATION
15Packet Page 101 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
Sa
f
e
t
y
/
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
$3
5
9
,
4
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
2
7
9
,
4
0
0
$
8
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
6
,
1
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$
4
3
,
6
0
0
$
1
2
,
5
0
0
$2
,
4
1
5
,
5
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
6
4
,
5
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
1
,
5
0
0
$
5
3
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
1
4
,
5
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
1
,
5
0
0
$
8
3
,
0
0
0
$8
7
9
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$9
3
8
,
6
6
7
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
5
1
,
7
1
5
$
6
8
6
,
9
5
2
$1
,
5
4
6
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
5
4
6
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
8
2
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$8
2
,
0
0
0
$1
4
6
,
4
3
6
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
3
9
,
2
8
5
$1
0
7
,
1
5
1
$2
,
7
1
3
,
1
0
3
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
9
1
,
0
0
0
$
7
9
4
,
1
0
3
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
$3
9
7
,
6
8
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
0
6
,
5
6
4
$
9
1
,
1
1
6
$3
,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
/
R
O
W
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
2
,
3
2
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$4
8
,
4
3
6
$
1
3
,
8
8
4
$3
,
8
6
2
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
,
4
3
1
,
0
0
0
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
So
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
21
2
t
h
@
8
4
t
h
(
5
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
b
y
co
n
v
e
r
t
i
n
g
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
(
2
)
l
a
n
e
s
f
o
r
bo
t
h
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
76
t
h
A
v
.
W
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
b
y
co
n
v
e
r
t
i
n
g
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
(
2
)
l
a
n
e
s
f
o
r
bo
t
h
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
r
e
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
LO
S
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
22
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
E
B
l
a
n
e
a
n
d
a
d
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
/
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
v
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
N
B
a
n
d
SB
L
T
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
de
l
a
y
.
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
y
st
o
p
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
N
B
an
d
S
B
t
o
a
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
4
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Re
a
l
i
g
n
h
i
g
h
l
y
s
k
e
w
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
c
r
e
a
t
e
n
e
w
e
a
s
t
-
w
e
s
t
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
9
9
a
n
d
I
-
5
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
22
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
de
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
a
n
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
9/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
16Packet Page 102 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
4
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
2
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
2
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
,
2
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
,
2
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(Fe
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
,
9
3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$3
,
9
3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
,
0
7
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$4
,
0
7
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$9
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$9
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
9
3
,
0
0
0
Hw
y
.
9
9
@
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Hw
y
9
9
@
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
t
w
o
-
w
a
y
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
al
o
n
g
t
h
i
s
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
(
5
0
/
5
0
s
p
l
i
t
w
i
t
h
Sn
o
h
o
m
i
s
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
;
t
o
t
a
l
c
o
s
t
:
~
2
0
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
)
.
Wi
d
e
n
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
a
d
d
a
2
n
d
WB
L
T
l
a
n
e
/
w
i
d
e
n
S
R
-
9
9
t
o
a
d
d
a
2n
d
L
T
l
a
n
e
.
Ca
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
84
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
(
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
2
3
8
t
h
St
.
S
W
)
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
n
v
e
r
t
a
l
l
-
w
a
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
@
1
7
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
LO
S
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
e
l
a
y
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Wi
d
e
n
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
a
d
d
a
L
T
l
a
n
e
an
d
a
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
l
a
n
e
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
L
T
p
h
a
s
e
f
o
r
N
B
a
n
d
S
B
.
Wi
d
e
n
2
1
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
a
d
d
a
W
B
ri
g
h
t
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
.
Co
n
v
e
r
t
a
l
l
-
w
a
y
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
l
e
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
Ii
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
9/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
17Packet Page 103 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
4
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
No
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
$6
4
1
,
3
8
8
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
4
1
,
3
8
8
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
T
I
B
D
e
s
i
g
n
/
C
o
n
s
t
.
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Gr
a
n
t
$
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$8
9
0
,
3
8
8
T
o
t
a
l
$
8
9
0
,
3
8
8
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
7
7
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$7
7
7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
2
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$2
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$4
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$3
2
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$7
9
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
9
,
0
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
7
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$5
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
9
3
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
3
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
P
r
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
$
1
2
4
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$9
1
7
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
1
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
7
9
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
.
t
o
Ca
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
o
n
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
,
f
a
c
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
sa
f
e
t
y
o
n
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
5
t
h
a
n
d
6t
h
a
l
o
n
g
w
/
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
al
o
n
g
t
h
a
t
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
2n
d
A
v
e
.
S
f
r
o
m
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
t
o
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Ma
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
l
o
n
g
23
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
,
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
s
a
f
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
10
4
a
n
d
M
a
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
r
o
u
t
e
t
o
Se
v
i
e
w
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
a
n
d
n
e
a
r
b
y
pa
r
k
s
.
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
Av
e
.
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
80
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
f
r
o
m
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
t
o
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Da
y to
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
mi
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Sh
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
to
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
w
i
t
h
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
22
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
be
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
-
1
0
4
a
n
d
1
0
5
t
h
P
l
.
W
,
cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
s
a
f
e
r
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
S
h
e
r
w
o
o
d
El
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
9/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
18Packet Page 104 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
4
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
7
5
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
7
5
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
$
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
6
3
,
0
0
0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
6
3
,
0
0
0
T
o
t
a
l
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$8
1
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$8
1
2
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
,
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(
L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
T
o
t
a
l
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
f
r
o
m
7
6
t
h
Av
e
.
W
t
o
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
li
n
k
.
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Cr
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
r
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
l
o
n
g
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
18
9
t
h
P
l
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
8
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
t
o
78
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
t
o
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
SW
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
t
o
ex
.
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
l
o
n
g
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
(M
a
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
)
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
A
v
e
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
t
o
S
R
-
5
2
4
/
19
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
(
e
x
.
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
:
r
o
l
l
e
d
c
u
r
b
/
u
n
s
a
f
e
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
a
l
o
n
g
a
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
w
i
t
h
h
i
g
h
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
4t
h
A
v
e
.
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
o
r
t
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
l
i
n
k
.
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
1
0
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
t
o
10
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
9/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
19Packet Page 105 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
20
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
20
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
20
1
4
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$0
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$0
To
t
a
l
$1
,
0
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$7
5
,
0
0
0
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
(L
o
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$1
7
,
4
8
0
,
9
9
1
An
n
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$
1
,
9
4
4
,
3
8
8
$
1
,
0
2
1
,
6
0
3
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
8
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
6
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
3
1
,
9
8
8
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
So
u
r
c
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
7
2
0
1
8
-
2
0
2
5
$2
,
3
4
9
,
1
3
5
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
,
4
9
1
,
0
6
7
$
8
5
8
,
0
6
8
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
1
,
2
2
4
,
5
0
0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
7
,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
9
7
9
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
9
3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
9
8
6
,
0
0
0
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
$0
$0
$0
$
4
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
4
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
1
,
7
7
7
,
0
0
0
$9
2
1
,
3
5
6
Lo
c
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
$4
5
3
,
3
2
1
$
1
4
3
,
5
3
5
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
1
,
5
0
0
$
8
3
,
0
0
0
$0
To
a
s
s
i
s
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
re
s
p
o
n
d
i
n
g
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
is
s
u
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
s
p
e
e
d
i
n
g
,
c
u
t
-
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Ca
l
m
i
n
g
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
b
y
Y
e
a
r
84
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
an
d
1
8
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
th
o
s
e
(
2
)
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
23
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
f
r
o
m
H
w
y
.
9
9
t
o
7
6
t
h
Av
e
.
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
m
i
n
o
r
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
.
S:
\
E
N
G
R
\
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
B
O
O
K
S
\
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
\
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
_
d
r
a
f
t
S
i
x
-
Y
e
a
r
C
F
P
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
_
0
8
.
3
1
.
1
1
9/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
20Packet Page 106 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 212th St. SW / 84th Ave.
W (5-Corners) Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,535,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The intersection of 84th Ave and 212th is 5 legged, which also
includes Main Street and Bowdoin Way approaches. The intersection is controlled with stop
signs. A roundabout would be constructed and yield signs placed at each approach.
Installation will require the acquisition of right of way adjacent to the intersection.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection currently functions at LOS F and delays
during the PM peak hour will worsen over time. A roundabout will improve the LOS and reduce
the need for vehicles to stop during low volume periods. A roundabout would improve the
intersection LOS to B.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for the design and right of way phases (scheduled
for 2011 – 2013). Construction scheduled for 2015 (pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$323,000 $92,500
Construction $2,000,000
1% for Art *
TOTAL $323,000 $92,500 $2,000,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
21Packet Page 107 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196th St. SW)/ 88th
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $879,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave.
W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and
southbound traffic to right-turn-only (prohibiting left-turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be
implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are
met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St.
SW.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2015 – 2016 and construction in 2017 (must meet an
MUTCD traffic signal warrant and get WSDOT approval such 196th St. SW is a State Route.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$100,000 $163,000
Construction $616,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $100,000 $163,000 $616,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
22Packet Page 108 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9th Ave. S –
(Interim solution)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Removal of parking on both sides of 9th Avenue (ex. conditions: 1
lane in each direction) and restriping of 9th Ave. S (2 lanes in each direction).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and
the existing intersection LOS is E (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D). The
improvement will reduce intersection delay and improve the LOS to D.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
23Packet Page 109 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 76th Ave W @ 212th St
SW Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,713, 000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 76th Ave. W to add a northbound left-turn lane for 250’
storage length and a southbound left turn lane for 125’ storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for northbound and southbound movements. Widen 212th to add a westbound right
turn lane for 50’ storage length.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
existing intersection LOS is D and F (below City’s concurrency standards) by 2015.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for the design and right of way phases. Design and
right of way acquisition are scheduled for 2012-2013. Construction is scheduled for 2015
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$291,000 $794,103 $228,000
Construction $1,400,000
1% for Art *
TOTAL $291,000 $794,103 $1,628,000
* All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
24Packet Page 110 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St and 9th Ave. S.
– (Interim solution)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Removal of parking on both sides of 9th Avenue (ex. conditions: 1
lane in each direction) and restriping of 9th Av. S (2 lanes in each direction).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and
the existing intersection LOS is E (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D). The
improvement will reduce intersection delay and improve the LOS to C.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
25Packet Page 111 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $173,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected-permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement
during southbound left turn phase.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
existing intersection LOS is D and E (below City’s concurrency standards) by 2015. The
improvement would improve the LOS to C by 2015.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and construction scheduled for 2017 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
* All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $138,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $173,000
26Packet Page 112 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 228th St. SW Corridor
Safety Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
$4,354,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 228th St across the unopened right-of-way to 76th
Avenue West 2) Signalize the intersection of 228th St SW @ SR99 and 228th St. SW @ 76th
Ave. West 3) Construct a raised median in the vicinity of 76th Avenue West.
4) Add illumination between 224th St SW and 228th St SW on SR 99
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The construction of this missing transportation link will
improve both access and safety to the I-5 / Mountlake Terrace Park & Ride lot from SR99.
This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two existing east-west
corridors (220th Street SW and SR104) that currently experience congestion for many hours
a day. Roadway safety will also be significantly improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW will
become a signalized intersection (already approved by WSDOT) with protected left turn
phasing for both approaches on SR99. The accident-prone left turns from SR99 to 76th Ave.
W. will be restricted with the addition of a raised center island on SR 99. The new traffic
signal will also provide pedestrians and bicycles with a safe, signalized crossing across
SR99, allowing easy access to the Interurban Trail, located ½ mile east of the intersection.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2011 - 2013, ROW acquisition for 2012-2013, and
construction for 2015 (pending grant funding). In 2010, federal grant was secured for the
completion of design and ROW acquisition.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration,
and ROW
$355,000 $105,000
Construction $3,402,000
1% for Art *
TOTAL $355,000 $105,000 $3,402,000
* All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
27Packet Page 113 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th
Ave. W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,431,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all
movements).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. By 2015,
the Level of Service will be F, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D). The
improvement would modify the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$286,000
Construction $1,145,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,431,000
28Packet Page 114 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Caspers St. @ 9th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,022,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop-controlled only
for the northbound movement, on 9th Ave. N.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay as vehicles going northbound
on 9th Ave. N are having difficulty accessing Caspers St.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$204,000
Construction $818,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,022,000
29Packet Page 115 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW
to 238th St. SW)
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,422,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along
this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with
their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any
back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since
half the project is in Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$2,042,000
Construction $8,169,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,211,000
30Packet Page 116 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW
intersection improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,932,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325’
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275’ storage length.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection delay from 72 seconds (w/o
improvement) to 62 seconds (w/ improvement) in 2015.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-
2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$786,000
Construction $3,146,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $3,932,000
31Packet Page 117 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW
intersection improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,079,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200’
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300’ storage length. Provide protected left turn
phase for eastbound and westbound movements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$815,000
Construction $3,264,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $4,079,000
32Packet Page 118 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174th Ave.
W Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $906,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50’
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$180,000
Construction $726,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $906,000
33Packet Page 119 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St. @ 9th Ave
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop controlled for
all approaches.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service, which is currently LOS E
(below City’s Level of Service standards: LOS D), to LOS B (w/ improvement).
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$220,000
Construction $873,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,093,000
34Packet Page 120 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. @ 9th Ave.
Intersection Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop controlled for
all approaches.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service, which is currently LOS E
(below City’s Level of Service standards: LOS D), to LOS A.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$220,000
Construction $873,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,093,000
35Packet Page 121 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Main St. Pedestrian
Lighting from 5th Ave. to 6th Ave.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $974,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of installing (11) historic style decorative light
poles along this block (6 on the south side and 5 on the north side), (4) decorative poles with
artist made elements at the top of the pole (2 on both sides), and inlaid street names at the
intersection corners. The visual character of this location will be further enhanced as each new
pole will have a planter basket for summer flowers. New sidewalk and curb gutter will be
installed along both sides of this stretch (total length: approximately 1,200'), to improve
pedestrian safety and remove the sidewalk humps and cracks. New ADA curb ramps or
truncated domes will be installed at all non-compliant curb ramps.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Increase pedestrian safety and activity along the
Downtown Retail Core.
SCHEDULE: A federal grant was secured for the design and construction of this project.
Design and construction will be completed by 2012. The Utility Funds are contributing $229,000
to replace the water main and fund new stormwater improvements.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$51,688
Construction $838,700
1% for Art
TOTAL $890,388
36Packet Page 122 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
TBD PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 80th Ave W from 188th St
SW to Olympic View Dr. Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $777,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct Walkway on 80th Ave West between 188th St SW and
180th St SW and on 180th St SW between 80th Ave W and Olympic View Drive (ranked #6 in
Long Walkway list in 2009 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provides safe pedestrian access between Seaview Park,
connecting to Olympic View Drive Walkway and Southwest County Park. Would create an
additional safe walking route for kids attending Seaview Elementary School (188th St. SW).
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2015 and 2016. Construction scheduled for 2017
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000 $100,000
Construction $647,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000 $100,000 $647,000
37Packet Page 123 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Madrona Elementary
School Walkway (234th SW / 236th St. SW)
Long Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,085,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a walkway on the south side of 236th St. SW from SR
104 to 94th Ave. W., extending northbound on 94th Ave. W to 234th St., westbound on 234th St.
to 97th Ave. W, and finally connecting back to SR 104 on 97th Ave. W (ranked #1 in the list of
Long Walkway projects in the 2009 Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. The current
pedestrian conditions are unsafe near Madrona Elementary School and along 236th St. SW
because of the limited sight distance issues (curvature of the roadway).
SCHEDULE: Design scheduled for 2016, pending state funding (such as Pedestrian and
Bicycle Safety Grant)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$410,000
Construction $1,675,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $410,000 $1,675,000
38Packet Page 124 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S from James St.
to Main St. Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $32,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 100’) on 2nd Ave. S
between Main St. and James St. (ranked #1 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $32,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $32,000
39Packet Page 125 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maple St. from 7th Ave. S to
8th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $63,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 250’) on Maple St.
between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2015 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $53,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $63,000
40Packet Page 126 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St between 7th Ave.
S and 8th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $79,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 250’) on Dayton St.
between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2015 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $69,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $79,000
41Packet Page 127 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Shell Valley Emergency
Access
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $600,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an emergency access road from the Shell
Valley subdivision to Main Street which will serve as a bikeway and walkway as
well.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Severe grade of the primary road into the Shell
Valley subdivision, results in access problems during winter freezing events. The
proposed access road will provide emergency access for these winter freezing
events and serve as a bicycle pedestrian path the remainder of the year.
SCHEDULE: Design was completed in 2010 and construction is scheduled for
completion in 2011.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $7,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $7,000
42Packet Page 128 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 226th St SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $213,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 300’ of walkway) on 226th
St. SW between SR-104 and 105th Pl. A Federal Grant was secured to fund both the
engineering and construction phases of project.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: The construction phase started in August 2011 and will be completed by October
2011. A grant was secured for $185,000 for design / construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000
43Packet Page 129 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway from
Bell St to Caspers St.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $917,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a sidewalk on the west side of the street, facing waterfront.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Design is scheduled in 2015 and construction in 2016 (pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$138,000
Construction $779,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $138,000 $779,000
44Packet Page 130 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway
from Main St. to 200th St. SW
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $675,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct Walkway on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St.
SW (~ 2,700’). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #2 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non-motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2016 (project is dependent on obtaining a grant, such
as the “Safe Routes to School”).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$125,000
Construction $550,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $125,000 $550,000
45Packet Page 131 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Beach Rd.
Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $950,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a walkway on Meadowdale Beach Dr. between 76th Ave. W
and Olympic View Dr. (~3,800’). This is one of the last collectors in the City with no sidewalk on
either side of the street (ranked #4 in Long Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route connecting a
minor arterial w/ high pedestrian activity (Olympic View Dr.) to a collector with sidewalk on the east
side of the street (76th Ave. W). Meadowdale Elementary School is directly north of the project on
Olympic View Dr.
SCHEDULE: Design scheduled for 2017 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 - 2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$190,000
Construction $760,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $190,000 $760,000
46Packet Page 132 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 3rd Ave. S to
4th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $220,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 350’) on Walnut St.
between 3rd Ave. S and 4th Ave. S (ranked #5 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2015 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$20,000
Construction $200,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $220,000
47Packet Page 133 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 6th Ave. S to
7th Ave. S Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $110,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link (approximately 700’) on Walnut St.
between 6th Ave. S and 7th Ave. S (ranked #4 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2017 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction $100,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $110,000
48Packet Page 134 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 4th Ave Corridor
Enhancement
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,263,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Corridor improvements along 4th Avenue to build on concept plan
developed in the Streetscape Plan update (2006).
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center
for the Arts. Timing for design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will
assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the project
implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2014 - 2015 (pending grant funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study $63,000
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000 $1,000,000
Construction $4,000,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $63,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $4,000,000
49Packet Page 135 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from 100th Av. W
to 104th Av. W
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $812,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #8 in Long Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating safe
pedestrian connection between 104th Av. W and 100th Av. W.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$162,000
Construction $650,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $812,000
50Packet Page 136 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Olympic Ave. from Main St. to
SR-524 / 196th St. SW Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,249,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #3 in Long Walkway project list in 2009 Transportation
Plan. Install new sidewalk on the east side of the street. The ex. sidewalk is unsafe because of
rolled curb.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and create
safe pedestrian access to Yost Park and Edmonds Elementary.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction $1,049,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,249,000
51Packet Page 137 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 189th Pl. W from 80th Ave. W to
78th Ave. W Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked # 7 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on either side of the street.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and create
connection to ex. sidewalk on 189th Pl. W. This missing link will create a pedestrian connection from
80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $140,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $175,000
52Packet Page 138 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W between 188th St.
SW and 186th St. SW Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan. Install
5’ sidewalk on the east side of the street to connect to the existing sidewalk to the south.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch, such as school
kids walking to Seaview Elementary.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$35,000
Construction $140,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $175,000
53Packet Page 139 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
76th Ave. W Walkway
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,050,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Long Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan.
Install 5’ sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating safe
pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2025 (unsecured
funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018-2025
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$210,000
Construction $840,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,050,000
54Packet Page 140 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Residential Neighborhood
Traffic Calming
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Varies
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The traffic calming program is designed to assist residents and City
staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut-through traffic and
safety.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Allows traffic concerns to be addressed consistently and
traffic calming measures to be efficiently developed and put into operations.
SCHEDULE: annual program
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Construction $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
55Packet Page 141 of 253
56Packet Page 142 of 253
CFP
STORMWATER
57Packet Page 143 of 253
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
2
5
)
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
4
6
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$5
4
6
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$5
5
3
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
8
,
0
0
0
$5
5
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
8
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
De
s
i
g
n
$0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
7
5
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$
1
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$6
7
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
(
D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(P
a
r
k
s
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
)
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
4
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
8
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Po
s
s
i
b
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
/
T
B
D
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
$
0
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
(D
e
b
t
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
s
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
$3
,
1
9
9
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
8
6
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
8
3
9
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
C
F
P
$2
,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
A
n
n
u
a
l
C
F
P
T
o
t
a
l
s
$
5
5
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
5
2
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
1
2
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
6
2
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
s
So
u
r
c
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
$0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
&
S
t
a
t
e
(U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Pa
r
k
s
/
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2
,
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
/
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
e
e
(S
e
c
u
r
e
d
a
n
d
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$4
5
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
3-
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
t
w
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
y
e
a
r
'
s
C
F
P
(
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
)
1
-
2
0
1
2
v
a
l
u
e
i
s
5
0
%
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
v
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
p
i
l
e
s
.
5
0
%
p
a
i
d
b
y
w
a
t
e
r
+
s
e
w
e
r
f
u
n
d
s
.
5
1
1
F
u
n
d
w
i
l
l
c
o
v
e
r
P
h
a
s
e
2
i
n
20
1
3
-
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
W
a
s
h
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
b
y
Y
e
a
r
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
Cr
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
/
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
/
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
2&
3
Co
n
d
u
c
t
r
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
f
l
a
p
g
a
t
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
b
e
t
t
e
r
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
P
u
g
e
t
S
o
u
n
d
,
a
n
d
r
e
m
o
v
e
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
.
Da
y
l
i
g
h
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
(
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
l
y
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
)
.
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Fi
n
d
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
h
i
g
h
p
e
a
k
s
t
r
e
a
m
f
l
o
w
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
st
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
t
h
a
t
e
r
o
d
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
,
c
a
u
s
e
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
ha
v
e
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
a
q
u
a
t
i
c
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
.
2-
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
i
n
2
0
1
2
i
s
S
t
o
r
m
F
u
n
d
m
o
n
e
y
t
o
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
w
i
t
h
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
f
r
o
m
p
a
r
k
s
t
o
m
a
t
c
h
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
g
r
a
n
t
;
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
s
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
tw
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
y
e
a
r
'
s
C
F
P
(
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
)
La
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
F
o
r
u
m
o
n
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
20
1
7
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
n
e
a
r
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
L
a
n
e
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
v
e
r
f
l
o
w
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
So
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
3
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
S
u
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
t
o
Hi
c
k
m
a
n
P
a
r
k
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
Ad
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
l
o
o
d
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
.
95
t
h
/
9
3
r
d
S
t
.
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ad
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
l
o
o
d
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
.
Re
v
e
n
u
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Y
a
r
d
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
(C
o
v
e
r
f
o
r
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
P
i
l
e
s
)
1
St
a
y
i
n
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
e
r
m
i
t
(
N
P
D
E
S
)
20
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
P
u
r
p
o
s
e
Gr
a
n
t
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
Gr
a
n
t
/
D
a
t
e
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ph
a
s
e
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
58Packet Page 144 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Southwest Edmonds Basin
Study Project 2 – Connect Sumps near
Robinhood Lane – 1B
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $546,000
Sumps along Friar Tuck Lane
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 1600 ft of 12 inch diameter pipe (600 ft in the public right of
way and 1000 ft on private property), 4 manholes, and 9 new connections to the existing storm
drain system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Several sumps (dry wells) in the vicinity of Robin Hood
Drive in Southwest Edmonds overflow during large storm events. Over time they have clogged
and may cause flooding. Connecting the sumps to the City of Edmonds storm drain system
with an overflow pipe, to function in large storm events, will reduce the potential for flooding.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $105,000 $441,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $105,000 $441,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
59Packet Page 145 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Southwest Edmonds Basin
Study Project 3 – Connect Sumps on 238th St
SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System – 1C
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $553,000
Alignment of the proposed storm drain pipe along 238th St SW.
Existing catch basin sumps in the foreground.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 825 ft of 12 inch diameter pipe, replace 950 ft of existing 12
inch diameter pipe, 3 manholes, and 12 new connections to the existing storm drain system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Several sumps (dry wells) along 238th St SW in
Southwest Edmonds are not functioning properly. They have become clogged and are
contributing to area flooding during large storm events. Connecting the sumps to the City of
Edmonds infiltration system in Hickman Park will reduce the potential for flooding.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $105,000 $448,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $105,000 $448,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
60Packet Page 146 of 253
PROJECT NAME: 95th / 93rd St Drainage
Improvement Project - 5
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $226,000
Project area along 93rd Pl W, south of 224th St SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install storm drain pipe, catch basins, and Low Impact
Development features, such as infiltration galleries and rain gardens.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The drainage system in the vicinity of 95th Pl W, 93rd
PL W, and 224th St SW is inadequate; therefore causing flooding. This area was annexed
into the City in October 1995. Installing a new stormwater infrastructure will handle the
stormwater runoff more efficiently and will reduce the potential for flooding.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $26,000 $200,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $26,000 $200,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
61Packet Page 147 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Lake Ballinger Associated
Projects - 7
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $675,000
Lake Ballinger
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work independently and with other members of the Greater Lake
Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum to implement the Strategic Action Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Homes surrounding Lake Ballinger and McAleer Creek
have flooded during very large storm events. There are also significant water quality issues in
the watershed. Working with other entities will ensure cohesive standards between all
jurisdictions that will help reduce flooding and improve the water quality concerns.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $102,000 $106,000 $110,000 $115,000 $119,000 $123,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $102,000 $106,000 $110,000 $115,000 $119,000 $123,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
62Packet Page 148 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Public Works Yard Water
Quality Upgrades (Cover for Material Piles) - 9
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000
Existing Stockpiles
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide 12,000 square feet of covered space for
materials/aggregates at the Public Works Yard to meet requirements for the Federal and State
Clean Water Act. A vehicle wash station, formerly part of this project has been moved to the
Fleet 511B Fund for 2013. Users of the wash station would reimburse the fund.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Materials/aggregates are needed onsite due to daily
usage by the Public Works Operations Crews Providing coverage will allow for the City to meet
the requirements under the Federal and State Clean Water Act. The estimated cost of this
project is $250,000. Half will be paid by the stormwater utility and the other half by a
combination of water and sewer utility funds.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $125,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $125,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
63Packet Page 149 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds
Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr – 12 & 13
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,173,000
Edmonds Marsh as seen from the vie wing platform. Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source:
www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-up/gallery.php
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initially, conduct a feasibility study to improve drainage and assess
the potential for increasing salmonid habitat. The final project may include 23 acres of
revegetation, construct new tide gate to allow better connectivity to the Puget Sound, removal
of sediment, 1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane (6 ft
bottom width x 4 ft depth; 3H:1V side slopes)
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The daylight of willow creek will help reverse the negative
impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped. It
will also help eliminate the sedimentation of the marsh and the transition to freshwater species
and provide habitat for salmonids.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $150,000 $942,000 $2,381,000 $3,700,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $150,000 $942,000 $2,381,000 $3,700,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
64Packet Page 150 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow
Management Project – 15
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $8,906,000
Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that
will be addressed by restoration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Following up on a basin study scheduled for 2013 (CIP project),
this project would implement recommendations in that plan for flow reduction in the Creek.
One possible option may include the construction of a high flow diversion pipe, 4560 ft of 42
inch diameter storm drain pipe (2,800 ft in the public right of way, 1,000 ft on private property,
700 ft through Snohomish County Park, 30 ft under Frederick Pl, and 30 ft under Talbot Rd)
and 1,000 ft of streambank restoration.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased
flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low-gradient downstream
reaches of the creek. The high flow diversion pipe will divert high peak stream flows caused by
excessive stormwater runoff at the intersection of 76th Ave W and Olympic View Dr and reduce
the erosion to Perrinville Creek.
SCHEDULE: 2012-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $3,199,000 $2,868,000 $2,839,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $3,199,000 $2,868,000 $2,839,000
1. Total costs are in 2011 dollars.
2. Future expenses reflect the following annual inflation rates: 2012 2%; 2013 4%; 2014 4%; 2015 4%; 2016 4%; 2017 4%
65Packet Page 151 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2012-2017
1Packet Page 152 of 253
2Packet Page 153 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2012-2017)
Table of Contents
FUND DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT PAGE
GENERAL
112 Transportation Public Works 6
113
Multimodal
Transportation
Community
Services
9
116
Building
Maintenance
Public Works
10
125
REET-2
Transportation
Public Works
12
129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation 13
412-100 Water Projects Public Works 14
412-200 Storm Projects Public Works 15
412-300 Sewer Projects Public Works 17
414
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
19
PARKS
125
REET-2 Parks
Improvement
Parks & Recreation
22
126 Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation 50
132
Parks Construction
(Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
54
3Packet Page 154 of 253
4Packet Page 155 of 253
CIP
GENERAL
5Packet Page 156 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
1
2
-
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
)
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
-
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
9
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$1
,
2
0
0
$0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
-
S
i
g
n
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
7
,
5
0
0
$
2
2
,
5
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
-
C
a
b
i
n
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
St
r
e
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
@
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
$5
0
8
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
8
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
f
o
r
N
B
L
T
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
@
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
(
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
)
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Ca
b
i
n
e
t
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
-
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
@
2
3
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
W
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
Sa
f
e
t
y
/
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
21
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
/
8
4
t
h
A
v
e
(
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
X
$
1
2
0
,
5
0
0
$
3
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
9
2
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
1
5
,
5
0
0
SR
5
2
4
(
1
9
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
)
/
8
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
1
6
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
9
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
3
r
d
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$1
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
3
,
0
0
0
Pu
g
e
t
D
r
.
@
O
V
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
1
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
8
,
0
0
0
Ma
i
n
S
t
.
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
X
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
@
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
(
I
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
X
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
21
2
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
1
,
0
0
0
$
7
9
4
,
1
0
3
$
1
,
6
2
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
7
1
3
,
1
0
3
22
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
3
,
0
0
0
22
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
X
$
1
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
8
6
2
,
0
0
0
Ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
i
g
n
a
l
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
No
n
-
m
o
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
X
$
8
3
,
6
1
2
$
8
9
0
,
3
8
8
$8
9
0
,
3
8
8
SR
-
5
2
4
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$
1
0
1
,
2
0
0
$0
80
t
h
A
v
e
W
f
r
o
m
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
t
o
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
$
7
7
7
,
0
0
0
Ma
d
r
o
n
a
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
S
c
h
o
o
l
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$4
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
8
5
,
0
0
0
2n
d
A
v
e
.
S
f
r
o
m
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
t
o
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$
3
2
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
A
v
.
S
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
.
S
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$7
9
,
0
0
0
$
7
9
,
0
0
0
Sh
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
o
a
d
X
$
4
6
4
,
9
6
8
$
7
,
0
0
0
$7
,
0
0
0
22
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$
1
6
2
,
3
7
5
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
.
t
o
C
a
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
X
$1
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
7
7
9
,
0
0
0
$
9
1
7
,
0
0
0
AD
A
C
u
r
b
R
a
m
p
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
S
i
g
n
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
.
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
t
o
2
0
0
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
A
v
e
.
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
X
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
$
3
1
,
6
8
3
$0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
(
S
u
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
,
o
t
h
e
r
s
t
r
e
t
c
h
e
s
)
X
$
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
,
3
6
1
,
5
3
8
$
1
,
9
0
6
,
3
8
8
$
1
,
0
2
1
,
6
0
3
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
,
0
9
8
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
5
0
9
,
5
0
0
$
4
,
9
2
3
,
5
0
0
$
1
9
,
4
6
9
,
4
9
1
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
1
)
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
$1
9
,
2
3
2
$
1
9
,
1
4
1
$
1
9
,
0
5
0
$
1
8
,
9
6
0
$
1
8
,
8
6
9
$
1
8
,
8
6
0
$
1
8
,
7
7
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
2
)
2
2
0
t
h
S
t
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$2
2
,
6
5
9
$
2
2
,
5
5
3
$
2
2
,
4
4
7
$
2
2
,
3
4
1
$
2
2
,
2
3
5
$
2
2
,
2
2
9
$
2
2
,
1
2
3
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
L
o
a
n
(
3
)
1
0
0
t
h
A
v
e
R
o
a
d
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
$3
5
,
5
1
2
$
3
5
,
3
4
8
$
3
5
,
1
8
3
$
3
5
,
0
1
9
$
3
4
,
8
5
4
$
3
4
,
8
5
4
$
3
4
,
6
9
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
1
2
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
6Packet Page 157 of 253
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
$7
7
,
4
0
3
$
7
7
,
0
4
2
$
7
6
,
6
8
0
$
7
6
,
3
2
0
$
7
5
,
9
5
8
$
7
5
,
9
4
3
$
7
5
,
5
8
3
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
4
8
,
3
8
5
$3
0
3
,
7
9
2
$
3
0
1
,
4
2
9
$
3
0
4
,
2
1
4
$
4
6
2
,
8
9
4
$
5
3
9
,
9
3
6
$
7
3
0
,
4
9
3
Mo
t
o
r
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
F
u
e
l
T
a
x
$
1
4
6
,
8
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
$
3
4
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
-
S
u
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$
1
6
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
-
(
R
E
E
T
2
T
r
a
n
s
.
)
$
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
1
9
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
f
o
r
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
2
2
6
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
$
0
$
1
2
9
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
$
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
$1
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
(
W
A
T
E
R
)
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
(
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
)
$
0
$
5
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
-
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
(
S
E
W
E
R
)
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$9
5
7
,
1
8
5
$7
9
3
,
7
9
2
$
5
4
4
,
4
2
9
$
5
4
9
,
2
1
4
$9
5
9
,
8
9
4
$1
,
0
3
9
,
9
3
6
$1
,
2
3
2
,
4
9
3
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
(S
t
a
t
e
-
T
I
B
)
f
o
r
S
R
-
5
2
4
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$4
8
,
1
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
-
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
G
r
a
n
t
)
f
o
r
S
R
-
5
2
4
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
0
,
8
3
6
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$2
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
2
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
1
3
8
,
3
2
0
$
3
0
6
,
5
6
4
$
9
1
,
1
1
6
(S
t
a
t
e
)
f
o
r
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
5
t
h
t
o
6
t
h
A
v
e
$8
3
,
6
1
2
$
6
4
1
,
3
8
8
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
2
6
t
h
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
1
3
5
,
5
9
1
$
5
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
1
2
t
h
@
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$1
,
7
3
0
$
2
5
1
,
7
1
5
$
6
8
6
,
9
5
2
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
0
0
9
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
$2
0
,
2
7
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
2
1
2
t
h
@
8
4
t
h
(
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
)
R
o
u
n
d
a
b
o
u
t
$1
0
4
,
0
8
9
$
2
7
9
,
4
0
0
$
8
0
,
0
0
0
Y ea
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$7
8
5
,
5
4
8
$
1
,
4
9
1
,
0
6
7
$
8
5
8
,
0
6
8
$0
$0
$0
$0
Fu
n
d
1
1
2
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
7Packet Page 158 of 253
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
/
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
An
n
u
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Si
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
M
a
i
n
/
3
r
d
A
v
e
$1
5
3
,
0
0
0
10
0
t
h
@
2
3
8
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
9t
h
&
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
9t
h
&
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
i
n
t
e
r
i
m
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
)
$1
0
,
0
0
0
21
2
t
h
@
7
6
t
h
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
,
5
4
6
,
0
0
0
22
0
t
h
@
7
6
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
7
3
,
0
0
0
22
8
t
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
S
a
f
e
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$3
,
4
0
2
,
0
0
0
Ma
d
r
o
n
a
S
c
h
o
o
l
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
(
2
3
6
t
h
S
t
.
/
9
4
t
h
A
v
e
)
$4
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
2n
d
A
v
e
.
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
t
o
J
a
m
e
s
S
t
.
$3
2
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$6
3
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
7
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$7
9
,
0
0
0
Su
n
s
e
t
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
B
e
l
l
S
t
.
t
o
C
a
s
p
e
r
s
S
t
.
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
3
,
0
0
0
AD
A
C
u
r
b
R
a
m
p
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
S
i
g
n
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
B
e
a
c
h
R
d
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
9
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
t
o
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
l
n
u
t
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
6
t
h
t
o
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
21
2
t
h
&
8
4
t
h
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$1
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
88
t
h
@
1
9
6
t
h
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$8
6
,
5
0
0
$
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
3
,
0
0
0
OV
D
@
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
.
S
i
g
n
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
80
t
h
A
v
e
/
1
8
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
/
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
4
7
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
/
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
n
o
t
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$
8
,
7
5
4
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
4
5
7
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
/
N
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
$7
8
5
,
5
4
8
$
1
,
4
9
1
,
0
6
7
$
8
5
8
,
0
6
8
$0
$
8
,
7
5
4
,
5
0
0
$
2
,
2
7
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
4
5
7
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$1
,
7
4
2
,
7
3
3
$
2
,
2
8
4
,
8
5
9
$
1
,
4
0
2
,
4
9
7
$
5
4
9
,
2
1
4
$
9
,
7
1
4
,
3
9
4
$
3
,
3
1
5
,
9
3
6
$
5
,
6
8
9
,
4
9
3
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
($
1
,
3
6
1
,
5
3
8
)
(
$
1
,
9
0
6
,
3
8
8
)
(
$
1
,
0
2
1
,
6
0
3
)
(
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
9
,
0
9
8
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
2
,
5
0
9
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
4
,
9
2
3
,
5
0
0
)
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
($
7
7
,
4
0
3
)
(
$
7
7
,
0
4
2
)
(
$
7
6
,
6
8
0
)
(
$
7
6
,
3
2
0
)
(
$
7
5
,
9
5
8
)
(
$
7
5
,
9
4
3
)
(
$
7
5
,
5
8
3
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$3
0
3
,
7
9
2
$
3
0
1
,
4
2
9
$
3
0
4
,
2
1
4
$
4
6
2
,
8
9
4
$
5
3
9
,
9
3
6
$
7
3
0
,
4
9
3
$
6
9
0
,
4
1
0
Fu
n
d
1
1
2
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
8Packet Page 159 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
1
3
-
M
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
W
S
D
O
T
F
e
r
r
y
/
M
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
X
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
-
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
i
s
c
.
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
St
a
t
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
-
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
L
a
w
-
L
o
c
a
l
M
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
$
Fe
d
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
-
T
E
A
2
1
,
C
M
A
Q
,
B
u
s
5
3
0
9
RT
I
D
ST
2
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
6
Fu
n
d
1
1
3
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
9Packet Page 160 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
1
6
-
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
AD
A
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
C
i
t
y
W
i
d
e
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
t
u
d
y
$
1
9
,
6
5
1
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
R
a
d
i
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$6
5
,
0
0
0
$6
5
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
B
l
i
n
d
s
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
A
s
b
e
s
t
o
s
A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
/
G
y
m
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
u
n
t
e
r
t
o
p
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
O
i
l
T
a
n
k
D
e
c
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ce
m
e
t
e
r
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
G
u
t
t
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
E
l
e
v
a
t
o
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
M
a
i
n
t
.
B
l
d
g
.
R
o
o
f
$0
EV
C
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
C
a
r
p
e
t
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
6
H
V
A
C
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
C
a
r
p
e
t
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
C
a
r
p
e
t
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
2
0
S
t
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
D
e
c
k
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
n
d
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
A
D
A
D
o
o
r
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
$
6
,
0
7
6
$0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
P
l
a
z
a
A
p
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$4
,
5
0
0
$
4
,
5
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
P
l
a
z
a
B
r
i
c
k
F
a
ç
a
d
e
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
1
,
0
0
0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
F
i
r
e
A
l
a
r
m
P
a
n
e
l
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
2
2
,
9
9
6
$0
Li
b
r
a
r
y
W
o
o
d
T
r
i
m
$0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
F
l
o
o
r
i
n
g
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
G
u
t
t
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
E
x
t
.
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
$0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
F
i
r
e
A
l
a
r
m
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
/
F
i
r
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
#
1
7
S
o
f
f
i
t
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
$2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
P
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
$0
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
C
a
r
p
e
t
$0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
M
i
s
c
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
&
M
a
i
n
t
.
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
1
1
2
,
6
5
1
$0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
d
i
n
g
/
S
e
a
l
i
n
g
(
C
D
B
G
)
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
d
e
J
a
m
e
s
T
h
e
a
t
e
r
G
u
t
t
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Wa
d
e
J
a
m
e
s
R
o
o
f
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
/
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$
1
3
,
6
4
0
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$
1
9
0
,
0
1
4
$
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
3
,
5
0
0
$
2
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
2
7
4
,
5
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
1
6
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
10Packet Page 161 of 253
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$1
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
6
0
0
$
2
1
,
6
0
0
$
2
3
,
1
0
0
$
1
7
,
1
0
0
$
1
7
,
1
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
G
e
n
F
u
n
d
#
0
0
1
$5
6
,
6
0
0
$
5
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
CT
E
D
G
r
a
n
t
s
$1
1
2
,
6
5
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Sn
o
.
C
o
.
C
D
B
G
G
r
a
n
t
(
N
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$6
,
0
7
6
$0
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
EE
C
B
G
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$1
9
,
6
5
1
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
WA
S
t
a
t
e
H
C
P
F
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$3
7
9
,
9
7
8
$
2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
3
8
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
1
0
0
$
2
4
2
,
1
0
0
$
2
4
2
,
1
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$3
7
9
,
9
7
8
$
2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
3
8
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
4
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
4
8
,
1
0
0
$
2
4
2
,
1
0
0
$
2
4
2
,
1
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
($
1
9
0
,
0
1
4
)
(
$
2
4
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
3
6
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
2
3
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
2
3
1
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
2
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
3
0
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
8
9
,
9
6
4
$
1
,
6
0
0
$
2
1
,
6
0
0
$
2
3
,
1
0
0
$
1
7
,
1
0
0
$
1
7
,
1
0
0
$
1
2
,
1
0
0
Fu
n
d
1
1
6
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
11Packet Page 162 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
R
E
E
T
2
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
f
o
r
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
RE
E
T
2
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
12Packet Page 163 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
9
-
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
St
a
t
e
R
o
u
t
e
(
S
R
)
9
9
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
$2
0
0
,
2
5
0
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
$3
1
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$2
0
0
,
2
5
0
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$1
,
5
3
9
$
1
,
5
3
9
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$1
,
5
3
9
$
1
,
5
3
9
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
PS
R
C
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
G
r
a
n
t
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$2
0
0
,
2
5
0
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
$2
0
0
,
2
5
0
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$2
0
1
,
7
8
9
$
3
1
4
,
5
3
9
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
($
2
0
0
,
2
5
0
)
(
$
3
1
3
,
0
0
0
)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$1
,
5
3
9
$
1
,
5
3
9
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
2
9
13Packet Page 164 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
-
W
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
CF
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
20
1
0
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
,
6
4
7
,
5
9
9
$
2
3
8
,
6
8
3
$2
3
8
,
6
8
3
20
1
1
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
,
4
9
3
,
9
7
2
$
5
0
7
,
8
7
6
$5
0
7
,
8
7
6
20
1
2
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$5
0
,
2
0
3
$
1
,
0
5
4
,
2
9
7
$1
,
0
5
4
,
2
9
7
20
1
2
W
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
$5
2
4
,
0
0
0
$5
2
4
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$8
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
0
5
,
8
8
0
$2
,
3
9
3
,
8
8
0
20
1
4
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
1
,
5
2
0
$
2
,
3
9
8
,
1
1
9
$
2
,
4
8
9
,
6
3
9
20
1
5
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
5
,
1
8
1
$
2
,
4
9
4
,
0
1
2
$
2
,
5
8
9
,
1
9
3
20
1
6
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$9
8
,
9
8
8
$
2
,
5
9
3
,
7
5
2
$
2
,
6
9
2
,
7
4
0
20
1
7
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
0
2
,
9
4
8
$
2
,
6
9
7
,
5
3
5
$
2
,
8
0
0
,
4
8
2
20
1
8
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$1
0
7
,
0
6
5
$
1
0
7
,
0
6
5
BN
S
F
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
$
4
6
,
2
2
2
$0
PR
V
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
1
A
b
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
$0
PR
V
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
2
A
b
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
$0
Sy
s
t
e
m
-
w
i
d
e
P
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
R
e
l
i
e
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
2
3
8
,
7
0
0
$
2
7
5
,
8
0
0
$
5
1
4
,
5
0
0
An
n
u
a
l
P
R
V
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
$
1
3
2
,
6
0
0
$
1
3
7
,
9
0
0
$
1
4
3
,
4
0
0
$
1
4
9
,
2
0
0
$
1
5
5
,
1
6
8
$
7
1
8
,
2
6
8
Al
d
e
r
w
o
o
d
M
e
t
e
r
,
S
e
a
v
i
e
w
&
Y
o
s
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
2
9
0
,
1
4
5
$
6
,
4
0
0
$6
,
4
0
0
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
4
6
,
8
1
4
$0
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
3
.
0
M
G
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
R
e
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
$7
2
2
,
8
0
0
$
7
2
2
,
8
0
0
Fi
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
1
.
5
M
G
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
R
e
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
$4
7
7
,
3
0
0
$
4
7
7
,
3
0
0
Fi
r
e
H
y
d
r
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
$
2
3
8
,
8
2
0
$
9
7
,
9
0
0
$
1
0
1
,
8
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
9
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
1
0
0
$
1
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
1
8
4
$
6
4
9
,
4
8
4
76
t
h
A
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
P
R
V
I
m
p
r
)
$
5
2
6
,
4
0
0
$5
2
6
,
4
0
0
Te
l
e
m
e
t
r
y
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$
5
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
1
,
9
0
0
$
1
2
,
4
1
0
$
1
1
5
,
4
1
0
20
1
0
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
$0
20
1
6
W
a
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
$8
6
,
1
0
0
$
8
9
,
5
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
6
0
0
GF
C
S
t
u
d
y
$
8
,
3
3
3
$
3
,
2
0
0
$3
,
2
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$
3
,
8
2
2
,
1
0
8
$
3
,
1
0
4
,
7
5
6
$
2
,
8
8
1
,
1
0
0
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
6
6
6
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
6
2
$
1
9
,
3
0
7
,
2
1
8
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
e
w
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
(
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
)
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$1
0
3
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
M
a
i
n
S
t
)
$
1
2
9
,
0
0
0
$1
2
9
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
)
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
2
,
5
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
2
3
2
,
5
0
0
To
t
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$
4
,
1
7
2
,
1
0
8
$
3
,
3
3
7
,
2
5
6
$
2
,
8
8
1
,
1
0
0
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
6
6
6
,
9
0
0
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
6
2
$
1
9
,
5
3
9
,
7
1
8
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$1
0
5
,
6
7
5
$
4
7
7
,
7
8
7
$
6
6
3
,
4
3
1
$
3
0
4
,
1
3
1
$
3
0
6
,
1
3
1
$
6
9
,
3
3
1
$
6
4
,
7
3
1
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
T
r
u
s
t
F
u
n
d
L
o
a
n
-
F
i
v
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
s
-
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
$2
0
,
4
0
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
T
r
u
s
t
F
u
n
d
L
o
a
n
-
2
0
1
0
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
$1
0
,
0
0
0
Fi
r
e
H
y
d
r
a
n
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
$2
3
8
,
8
2
0
$
9
7
,
9
0
0
$
1
0
1
,
8
0
0
$
1
0
5
,
9
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
1
0
0
$
1
1
4
,
6
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
1
8
4
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
1
$7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
s
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
L
o
a
n
s
,
m
i
s
c
)
$1
,
1
4
9
,
8
9
5
$
8
0
0
,
6
8
7
$
7
8
5
,
2
3
1
$
4
3
0
,
0
3
1
$
4
3
6
,
2
3
1
$
2
0
3
,
9
3
1
$
2
0
3
,
9
1
5
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Ne
w
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
l
o
a
n
s
,
b
o
n
d
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$3
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$3
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$4
,
6
4
9
,
8
9
5
$
4
,
0
0
0
,
6
8
7
$
3
,
1
8
5
,
2
3
1
$
3
,
3
3
0
,
0
3
1
$
3
,
7
3
6
,
2
3
1
$
3
,
6
0
3
,
9
3
1
$
3
,
2
0
3
,
9
1
5
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
($
4
,
1
7
2
,
1
0
8
)
(
$
3
,
3
3
7
,
2
5
6
)
(
$
2
,
8
8
1
,
1
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
0
2
3
,
9
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
6
6
6
,
9
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
5
3
9
,
2
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
0
9
1
,
3
6
2
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$4
7
7
,
7
8
7
$
6
6
3
,
4
3
1
$
3
0
4
,
1
3
1
$
3
0
6
,
1
3
1
$
6
9
,
3
3
1
$
6
4
,
7
3
1
$
1
1
2
,
5
5
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
14Packet Page 165 of 253
CF
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
$7
2
,
0
0
0
$7
2
,
0
0
0
X
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
4
6
,
0
0
0
X
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
4
8
,
0
0
0
$5
5
3
,
0
0
0
$1
3
,
6
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
1
5
,
0
0
0
X
$2
8
1
,
5
0
0
$0
$5
1
9
,
0
0
0
$5
1
9
,
0
0
0
$4
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
2
,
0
0
0
$2
1
8
,
0
0
0
$2
9
,
0
0
0
$5
4
,
0
0
0
$
8
3
,
0
0
0
$4
9
,
4
0
0
$
5
9
8
,
0
0
0
$5
9
8
,
0
0
0
$1
4
7
,
6
4
8
$1
4
7
,
6
4
8
X
$2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
6
,
0
0
0
$1
0
7
,
7
0
0
$
1
4
3
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
4
,
0
0
0
$1
6
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
2
,
0
0
0
$
9
4
6
,
0
0
0
X
$5
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
3
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
X
$1
7
,
5
0
0
$
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
4
,
1
0
5
$
2
4
,
1
0
4
$2
4
,
1
0
4
$6
9
,
5
0
0
$0
$7
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$
1
2
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
7
,
0
0
0
$1
3
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
8
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
4
,
0
0
0
$1
0
7
,
9
0
0
$0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
a
n
d
H
w
y
1
0
4
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
6
t
h
a
n
d
8
t
h
A
v
e
N
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
88
t
h
A
v
e
W
a
n
d
1
9
4
t
h
S
t
S
W
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
-
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
$6
0
5
,
0
0
0
$6
0
5
,
0
0
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
-
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
(S
e
e
No
t
e
s
8
&
9
)
X
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
/
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(S
e
e
No
t
e
s
8
&
9
)
X
$9
4
2
,
0
0
0
$2
,
3
8
1
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
0
2
3
,
0
0
0
Sh
e
l
l
C
r
e
e
k
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
Y
o
s
t
P
a
r
k
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
$1
7
8
,
0
0
0
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
g
h
F
l
o
w
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
X
$3
,
1
9
9
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
8
6
8
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
8
3
9
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
9
0
6
,
0
0
0
$8
2
2
,
2
0
5
$1
,
9
1
5
,
7
5
2
$
2
,
0
9
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
3
6
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
1
4
6
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
4
2
9
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
2
7
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
,
9
9
3
,
7
5
2
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Ta
l
b
o
t
R
d
/
P
e
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
&
H
a
b
i
t
a
t
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
S
t
o
r
m
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
1
-
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
I
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
i
p
e
(
n
e
a
r
1
0
7
t
h
PL
W
)
SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
s
u
m
p
s
n
e
a
r
R
o
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
LN SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
3
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
s
u
m
p
s
o
n
2
3
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
t
o
Hi
c
k
m
a
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
SW
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
4
-
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
s
u
m
p
s
o
n
1
0
5
t
h
&
1
0
6
t
h
Av
e
W
n
e
a
r
2
2
8
t
h
S
t
S
W
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
-
S
h
e
l
b
a
r
g
e
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
F
l
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
D
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
St
u
d
y
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
1
)
Wi
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
P
i
p
e
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
No
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
a
m
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
A
b
a
n
d
o
n
m
e
n
t
S
o
u
t
h
o
f
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
Re
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
o
r
t
h
s
t
r
e
a
m
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
u
n
d
e
r
P
u
g
e
t
D
r
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
C
u
l
v
e
r
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
95
t
h
/
9
3
r
d
S
t
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ci
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
2
)
La
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
3
)
No
r
t
h
T
a
l
b
o
t
R
d
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
S
t
o
r
m
C
u
r
e
d
i
n
-
p
l
a
c
e
p
i
p
e
(
C
I
P
P
)
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Lo
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
7
)
BN
S
F
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Y
a
r
d
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
(
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
W
a
s
h
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
&
C
o
v
e
r
fo
r
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
P
i
l
e
s
)
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
4
)
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
P
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(S
e
e
No
t
e
5
)
NP
D
E
S
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
P
e
r
m
i
t
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
(
I
l
l
i
c
i
t
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
,
P
u
b
l
i
c
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
O
&
M
)
(S
e
e
N
o
t
e
6
)
Da
y
t
o
n
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
t
o
r
m
Go
o
d
h
o
p
e
P
o
n
d
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
SW
P
e
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
B
a
s
i
n
S
t
u
d
y
St
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
S
t
u
d
y
a
n
d
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
St
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ti
e
r
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
-
A
s
s
u
m
e
7
5
%
G
r
a
n
t
F
u
n
d
e
d
&
2
5
%
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
e
d
u
n
l
e
s
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
15Packet Page 166 of 253
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
S
h
e
l
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
)
(Se
e
N
o
t
e
1
0
)
$1
9
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
)
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
M
a
i
n
S
t
L
I
D
R
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
)
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
2
2
6
t
h
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
)
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
$5
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
$5
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
3
3
8
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
s
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
-
P
e
r
m
e
a
b
l
e
P
a
v
i
n
g
-
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g n )
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
s
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
-
7
6
t
h
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
-
f
r
o
m
Ci
t
y -W
i
d
e
)
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
s
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
-
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
V
a
u
l
t
-
f
r
o
m
La
k
e
B
a
l
l
i
n
g er
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
1
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
7
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
2
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
8
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
7
7
,
2
0
5
$
2
,
0
8
6
,
7
5
2
$
2
,
1
4
8
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
9
1
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
2
0
3
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
4
8
9
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
3
3
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
4
,
4
5
1
,
7
5
2
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
($
2
4
3
,
9
9
7
)
$
1
1
7
,
9
0
3
$
4
6
8
,
1
5
1
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$1
2
4
,
1
0
5
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$2
9
5
,
1
0
8
$
3
5
4
,
9
0
3
$
6
8
0
,
1
5
1
$
2
6
6
,
5
0
5
$
2
6
6
,
5
0
5
$
2
6
6
,
5
0
5
$
2
6
6
,
5
0
5
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
$1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
2
2
,
3
5
4
$
2
,
9
7
9
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
8
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
5
1
,
0
0
0
$
9
9
2
,
7
5
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
1
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
9
2
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
1
2
9
,
2
5
0
$1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
2
2
,
3
5
4
$
2
,
9
7
9
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
9
9
1
,
0
0
0
$
7
,
2
7
7
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
2
2
,
0
0
0
$1
,
3
9
5
,
1
0
8
$
2
,
5
5
4
,
9
0
3
$
2
,
2
0
2
,
5
0
5
$
3
,
2
4
5
,
5
0
5
$
6
,
2
5
7
,
5
0
5
$
7
,
5
4
3
,
5
0
5
$
3
,
3
8
8
,
5
0
5
($
1
,
2
7
7
,
2
0
5
)
(
$
2
,
0
8
6
,
7
5
2
)
(
$
2
,
1
4
8
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
1
9
1
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
6
,
2
0
3
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
7
,
4
8
9
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
3
,
3
3
4
,
0
0
0
)
$1
1
7
,
9
0
3
$
4
6
8
,
1
5
1
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
$
5
4
,
5
0
5
6.
1
0
0
%
p
a
i
d
b
y
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
E
c
o
l
o
g
y
G
r
a
n
t
.
7.
L
I
D
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
M
a
i
n
S
t
.
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
a
2
0
1
2
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
)
.
3.
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
u
n
d
e
r
'
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
'
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
v
a
u
l
t
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
8.
A
s
s
u
m
e
s
a
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
g
r
a
n
t
f
r
o
m
S
a
l
m
o
n
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
B
o
a
r
d
i
n
2
0
1
2
w
i
t
h
a
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
m
a
t
c
h
f
r
o
m
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
F
u
n
d
9.
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
t
w
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
y
e
a
r
'
s
C
I
P
(
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
D
a
y
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
)
.
5.
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
u
n
d
e
r
'
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
'
f
o
r
2
2
6
t
h
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
10
.
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
p
a
i
d
b
y
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
E
c
o
l
o
g
y
G
r
a
n
t
.
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
Pr
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
L
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
d
e
b
t
(
B
o
n
d
s
)
As
s
u
m
e
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
o
a
n
s
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
&
i
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
1.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
n
o
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
u
s
e
d
t
o
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
K
a
r
l
s
t
e
n
h
o
m
e
n
e
a
r
G
o
o
d
h
o
p
e
P
o
n
d
.
2.
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
u
n
d
e
r
'
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
'
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
p
i
p
e
o
n
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
4.
5
0
%
o
f
t
o
t
a
l
c
o
s
t
f
o
r
c
o
v
e
r
i
n
g
p
i
l
e
s
.
A
s
s
u
m
e
d
2
5
%
e
a
c
h
f
r
o
m
w
a
t
e
r
&
s
e
w
e
r
f
u
n
d
s
.
5
1
1
F
u
n
d
w
i
l
l
c
o
v
e
r
P
h
a
s
e
2
in
2
0
1
3
-
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
W
a
s
h
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
No
t
e
s
:
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
In
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
F
u
n
d
(
4
1
1
)
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
s
(
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
)
Gr
a
n
t
s
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
16Packet Page 167 of 253
CF
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Li
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
7
a
n
d
8
a
n
d
W
e
s
t
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
e
w
e
r
$9
2
,
8
6
9
$0
Li
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
$6
8
3
,
7
1
9
$
3
4
5
,
9
7
9
$3
4
5
,
9
7
9
Li
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
3
,
4
,
5
,
9
,
1
0
,
1
1
,
1
2
,
1
4
,
&
1
5
$1
4
0
,
6
2
6
$
2
,
8
9
7
,
4
8
0
$
1
,
3
6
7
,
3
2
0
$4
,
2
6
4
,
8
0
0
20
1
2
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(2
2
4
t
h
,
A
l
d
e
r
S
t
,
B
e
a
c
h
P
l
,
D
e
l
l
w
o
o
d
)
$2
2
,
6
2
7
$
1
,
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
20
1
3
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(2
0
0
t
h
,
2
1
6
t
h
,
7
2
n
d
W
,
7
6
t
h
W
,
8
t
h
S
,
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
,
7
t
h
A
v
e
)
$1
4
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
8
7
9
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
2
7
,
0
0
0
20
1
5
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
,
N
W
T
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
,
7
1
1
7
-
1
7
6
t
h
,
8
0
1
5
-
1
9
6
t
h
,
46
5
A
d
m
i
r
a
l
W
,
1
0
5
3
A
l
d
e
r
,
2
4
0
t
h
S
t
,
7
6
t
h
A
v
e
W
,
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
)
$1
9
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
8
7
8
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
7
5
,
0
0
0
20
1
6
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
R
e
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(2
3
8
t
h
S
t
)
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
9
0
,
0
0
0
$4
3
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
e
w
e
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
GF
C
S
t
u
d
y
$8
,
3
3
3
$0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
C
I
P
P
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
$1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
5
6
,
0
0
0
I
&
I
S
t
u
d
y
$0
Me
t
e
r
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
B
a
s
i
n
L
S
-
0
1
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
3
,
6
0
0
$5
3
,
6
0
0
Me
t
e
r
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
B
a
s
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Z
o
n
e
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
Sm
o
k
e
T
e
s
t
Z
o
n
e
1
$0
Sm
o
k
e
T
e
s
t
i
n
B
a
s
i
n
L
S
-
0
1
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
Sm
o
k
e
T
e
s
t
i
n
B
a
s
i
n
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Z
o
n
e
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
7
4
,
0
0
0
$1
7
4
,
0
0
0
$9
6
8
,
1
7
4
$
4
,
9
9
0
,
0
5
9
$
3
,
5
5
1
,
3
2
0
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
8
5
6
,
3
7
9
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
1
1
2
(
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
)
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
s
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
)
$6
5
,
0
0
0
$1
4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
,
1
0
8
,
1
7
4
$
4
,
9
9
0
,
0
5
9
$
3
,
5
5
1
,
3
2
0
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
8
5
6
,
3
7
9
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
-
S
e
w
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Se
w
e
r
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Se
w
e
r
M
a
i
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
C
I
P
P
In
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
&
I
n
f
l
o
w
S
t
u
d
y
&
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
20
1
2
S
e
w
e
r
C
o
m
p
P
l
a
n
U
p
d
a
t
e
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
17Packet Page 168 of 253
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
$3
,
7
7
3
,
2
5
2
$
3
,
4
0
5
,
0
7
8
$
4
4
3
,
5
1
9
$
1
7
,
1
9
9
$
4
0
,
1
9
9
$
1
1
2
,
1
9
9
$
6
2
,
1
9
9
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
3
,
5
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
5
1
3
,
2
5
2
$
4
,
3
3
3
,
5
7
8
$
4
6
8
,
5
1
9
$
4
2
,
1
9
9
$
6
5
,
1
9
9
$
1
3
7
,
1
9
9
$
8
7
,
1
9
9
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
$1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
5
1
3
,
2
5
2
$
5
,
4
3
3
,
5
7
8
$
3
,
5
6
8
,
5
1
9
$
7
4
2
,
1
9
9
$
2
,
3
6
5
,
1
9
9
$
9
3
7
,
1
9
9
$
5
8
7
,
1
9
9
($
1
,
1
0
8
,
1
7
4
)
(
$
4
,
9
9
0
,
0
5
9
)
(
$
3
,
5
5
1
,
3
2
0
)
(
$
7
0
2
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
,
2
5
3
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
8
7
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
)
$3
,
4
0
5
,
0
7
8
$
4
4
3
,
5
1
9
$
1
7
,
1
9
9
$
4
0
,
1
9
9
$
1
1
2
,
1
9
9
$
6
2
,
1
9
9
$
1
0
2
,
1
9
9
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
Se
w
e
r
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
F
e
e
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
1
0
0
(
L
i
f
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
2
)
In
t
e
r
f
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
1
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
To
t
a
l
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
s
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
L
o
a
n
s
,
m
i
s
c
)
Un
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
Ne
w
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
,
l
o
a
n
s
,
b
o
n
d
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
To
t
a
l
U
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
Fu
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
18Packet Page 169 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
4
1
4
-
W
W
T
P
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Re
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$0
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
$0
St
u
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
$0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
a
n
d
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
$
2
7
6
,
0
4
0
$
2
7
1
,
9
1
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
1
,
6
5
2
,
8
6
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$2
7
6
,
0
4
0
$
2
7
1
,
9
1
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
$
1
,
6
5
2
,
8
6
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$2
3
0
,
4
8
1
$
2
0
5
,
9
4
0
$
2
0
5
,
5
3
0
$
2
0
5
,
8
4
0
$
2
0
6
,
1
5
0
$
2
0
6
,
4
6
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
(
b
i
o
s
o
l
i
d
s
,
L
y
n
n
w
o
o
d
,
e
t
c
)
$9
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
2
,
0
0
0
Re
b
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
P
U
D
f
o
r
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
.
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
,
0
0
0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$5
8
5
,
9
8
1
$
4
6
9
,
4
4
0
$
3
0
7
,
0
3
0
$
3
0
7
,
3
4
0
$
3
0
7
,
6
5
0
$
3
0
7
,
9
6
0
$
3
0
1
,
5
0
0
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
y
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
5
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$6
3
5
,
9
8
1
$
6
3
9
,
4
4
0
$
4
8
2
,
0
3
0
$
4
8
2
,
3
4
0
$
4
8
2
,
6
5
0
$
4
8
2
,
9
6
0
$
4
7
6
,
5
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
($
2
7
6
,
0
4
0
)
(
$
2
7
1
,
9
1
0
)
(
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
)
(
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
)
(
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
)
(
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
)
(
$
2
7
6
,
1
9
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$3
5
9
,
9
4
1
$
3
6
7
,
5
3
0
$
2
0
5
,
8
4
0
$
2
0
6
,
1
5
0
$
2
0
6
,
4
6
0
$
2
0
6
,
7
7
0
$
2
0
0
,
3
1
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
a
r
n
e
d
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
a
t
0
.
7
5
%
p
e
r
y
e
a
r
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
d
o
n
e
b
y
d
i
r
e
c
t
b
i
l
l
i
n
g
(
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
)
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Re
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
$1
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
St
u
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$4
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
b
r
e
a
k
d
o
w
n
b
y
a
g
e
n
c
y
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
50
.
7
9
%
$
2
3
3
,
6
2
0
$
5
5
8
,
6
5
7
$
3
0
4
,
7
2
2
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
$
3
3
0
,
1
1
6
Mo
u
n
t
l
a
k
e
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
23
.
1
7
%
$1
0
6
,
6
0
0
$
2
5
4
,
9
1
4
$
1
3
9
,
0
4
4
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
$
1
5
0
,
6
3
1
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
V
i
e
w
W
a
t
e
r
&
S
e
w
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
16
.
5
5
%
$7
6
,
1
3
5
$
1
8
2
,
0
6
1
$
9
9
,
3
0
6
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
$
1
0
7
,
5
8
2
Ro
n
a
l
d
S
e
w
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
9.
4
9
%
$4
3
,
6
4
5
$
1
0
4
,
3
6
8
$
5
6
,
9
2
8
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
$
6
1
,
6
7
2
TO
T
A
L
S
10
0
.
0
0
%
$4
6
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
0
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
4
1
4
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
19Packet Page 170 of 253
20Packet Page 171 of 253
CIP
PARKS
21Packet Page 172 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
P
a
r
k
s
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
Pa
r
k
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
*
Ha
i
n
e
s
W
h
a
r
f
P
a
r
k
&
W
a
l
k
w
a
y
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
F
i
e
l
d
/
C
o
u
r
t
/
S
t
a
g
e
$5
,
0
0
0
$
3
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
3
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$1
8
0
,
0
0
0
Br
a
c
k
e
t
t
'
s
L
a
n
d
i
n
g
N
o
r
t
h
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
9
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
$2
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
5
,
0
0
0
$2
8
5
,
0
0
0
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
X
$5
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
H
a
t
c
h
e
r
y
$5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
3
5
,
0
0
0
Fi
s
h
i
n
g
P
i
e
r
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
Fo
r
m
e
r
W
o
o
d
w
a
y
H
S
(w
i
t
h
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
)
X
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
5
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
P
a
r
k
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
r
i
n
a
B
e
a
c
h
P
a
r
k
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
$
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ma
t
h
a
y
B
a
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
P
a
r
k
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
,
0
0
0
$9
5
,
0
0
0
Me
a
d
o
w
d
a
l
e
C
l
u
b
h
o
u
s
e
G
r
o
u
n
d
s
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Pi
n
e
R
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Se
a
v
i
e
w
P
a
r
k
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
Si
e
r
r
a
P
a
r
k
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
Yo
s
t
P
a
r
k
/
P
o
o
l
$1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
5
,
0
0
0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
*
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
B
e
a
u
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
5
,
0
0
0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$1
8
6
,
0
0
0
Mi
s
c
P
a
v
i
n
g
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
P
a
r
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
/
M
i
s
c
S
m
a
l
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
Sp
o
r
t
s
F
i
e
l
d
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
/
P
l
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
z
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
*
Aq
u
a
t
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
(d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
)
X
$0
Tr
a
i
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
*
Mi
s
c
U
n
p
a
v
e
d
T
r
a
i
l
/
B
i
k
e
P
a
t
h
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
A
r
t
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
N
e
e
d
s
S
t
u
d
y
X
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
M
a
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
C
r
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
-
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
X
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Pa
r
k
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
S
t
u
d
y
/
O
t
h
e
r
P
a
r
k
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
$3
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
,
0
0
0
Pi
n
e
R
i
d
g
e
P
a
r
k
F
o
r
e
s
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
$5
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$
2
5
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
7
6
,
0
0
0
$
5
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
2
1
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
4
t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
)
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
P
l
a
z
a
)
$1
3
5
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
)
$2
9
4
,
0
0
0
$
3
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
O
l
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
)
$1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
P
a
r
k
F
u
n
d
1
3
2
(
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
)
To
t
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$4
0
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
9
7
,
5
0
0
$0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
$6
5
9
,
0
0
0
$
8
7
3
,
5
0
0
$
5
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
6
5
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
5
,
0
0
0
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
1
2
1
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
P
a
r
k
s
9/
2
9
/
2
0
1
1
22Packet Page 173 of 253
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$3
7
9
,
2
1
2
$
3
9
0
,
2
1
2
$
1
1
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
1
,
7
1
2
$
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
4
1
,
7
1
2
Re
a
l
E
s
t
a
t
e
T
a
x
1
/
4
%
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
Do
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
,
u
n
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$
7
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$0
$
0
$
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$1
,
0
4
9
,
2
1
2
$
9
9
0
,
2
1
2
$
7
1
6
,
7
1
2
$
7
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
6
1
1
,
7
1
2
$
6
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
7
4
1
,
7
1
2
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
$1
,
0
4
9
,
2
1
2
$
9
9
0
,
2
1
2
$
7
1
6
,
7
1
2
$
7
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
6
1
1
,
7
1
2
$
6
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
7
4
1
,
7
1
2
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
&
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
($
6
5
9
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
8
7
3
,
5
0
0
)
(
$
5
7
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
7
3
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
6
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
5
0
5
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
1
7
0
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$3
9
0
,
2
1
2
$
1
1
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
1
,
7
1
2
$
4
6
,
7
1
2
$
1
4
1
,
7
1
2
$
5
7
1
,
7
1
2
*P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
a
l
l
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
1
%
f
o
r
a
r
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
Fu
n
d
1
2
5
-
P
a
r
k
s
9/
2
9
/
2
0
1
1
23Packet Page 174 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center
Field/Court
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $180,000
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children’s play equipment. Replacement and renovation of amphitheater in 2012 with
improved courtyard area and drainage.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $5,000 $30,000 $130,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $5,000 $30,000 $130,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
24Packet Page 175 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Brackett’s Landing
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $115,000
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed-of-Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
repairs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $5,000 $5,000 $90,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $5,000 $5,000 $90,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
25Packet Page 176 of 253
PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $285,000
3rd Avenue South and Howell Way, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
14.5 acres; Community Park / Zoned public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upper lot and other parking improvements. Replacement of upper
and lower playgrounds. Extend walkway paths and other miscellaneous improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Repair and improvements for one of the City’s most
heavily used parks. Play structures in need of replacement.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $210,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $210,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
26Packet Page 177 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Complex
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Park Development
Bleacher/stadium repairs, infield mix, baseball/softball turf repair, retaining wall, fence and
play structure replacement, skate park and facility amenities, tennis and sports courts repair
and resurfacing, irrigation. Regrade and improve track. Upgrade portable restrooms.
Landscape and site furnishing improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for Civic Center Field.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $5,000 $0 $75,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $0 $75,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
27Packet Page 178 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Hatchery
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $140,000
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the
comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water
impacts. Continue to support day-lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway
repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible.
Hatchery repairs as needed. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget
Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co-fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water
Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant
funds available through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engin. & Admin.
Construction $5,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $5,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $100,000 $10,000
28Packet Page 179 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms ESTIMATED COST: $60,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re-tile and
renovate restroom facilities. Electrical upgrade, rail and shelter replacements / renovations.
Work with WDFW on structural repairs of concrete spalling on pier subsurface.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $20,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $20,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
29Packet Page 180 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Former Woodway HS
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $555,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges,
user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital
campaign. $10m - $12M project.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and undermaintained
facility with great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $55,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $55,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
30Packet Page 181 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $55,000
89th Place West and 197th Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2013, 2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $10,000 $40,000 $5,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $40,000 $5,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
31Packet Page 182 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $125,000
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; Protected through Deed-of-Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand parking area. Portable restroom upgrades. Repair and
improvements to off-leash area. Replace play structure and install interpretive sign.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2013-2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $0 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $0 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
32Packet Page 183 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $95,000
78th Place W. & 241st. St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Install path from Interurban Trail spur terminal to parking lot. Replace play structure and
improve picnic area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2012 - 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $75,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $75,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
33Packet Page 184 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse
Grounds
ESTIMATED COST: $50,000
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site. Replace playground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
34Packet Page 185 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
83rd Avenue West and 204th St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2015
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $30,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000
New additions meet the 1% for the Arts Ordinance requirements
35Packet Page 186 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park
Improvements
ESTIMATED COST: $35,000
80th Street West and 186th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed-
Of-Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Re-surface
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area maintenance. Renovate restrooms.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2012, 2014
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $0 $25,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $25,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
36Packet Page 187 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $115,000
80th Street West and 191th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve pathways and interpretive braille signs. Field renovation
to include field drainage for turf repair.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities,
basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind.
SCHEDULE: 2014-2015
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $40,000 $75,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $40,000 $75,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
37Packet Page 188 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park/Pool
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $470,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in-pool play amenities.
Park site improvements and repairs to trails and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping,
parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $120,000 $120,000 $10,000 $75,000 $125,000 $10,000 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $120,000 $120,000 $10,000 $75,000 $125,000 $10,000 $10,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
38Packet Page 189 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $216,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include library, Senior Center, outdoor
plaza, city park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree
plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $30,000 $36,000 $40,000 $35,000 $35,000 $40,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000 $36,000 $40,000 $35,000 $35,000 $40,000
39Packet Page 190 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Paving ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $40,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes miscellaneous small paving and park walkway
improvements citywide.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvement needs citywide in park system.
SCHEDULE: 2010-2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
* all or a portion of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
40Packet Page 191 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4th Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction $35,000 $35,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $35,000 $35,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000
41Packet Page 192 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field / Playground
Partnerships
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non-City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2011 - 2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0
42Packet Page 193 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Center
at Yost Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 –
$23,000,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study
completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the
consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the
summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of
its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of
Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the
current pool.
SCHEDULE: 2010-2016
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
43Packet Page 194 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved
Trail/Bike Path/Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
44Packet Page 195 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Cultural Arts Facility
Needs Study
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initiate feasibility study of providing and promoting Cultural / Arts
facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high
priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008
update process.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for
public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority
creates the need to study performance, management and long term potential for arts related
facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $30,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
45Packet Page 196 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Parks, Recreation & Open
Space Comprehensive Plan
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $100,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of the plan is to identify the need for parks, open
space, and recreation facilities in the Edmonds area and to establish policies and implement
strategies to meet those needs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The plan identifies and evaluates existing park and
recreation facilities and programs and develops an approach to ensure their continuation and
expansion.
SCHEDULE: 2014
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $100,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $100,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
46Packet Page 197 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds
Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr – Feasibility
Study
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Produce comprehensive environmental master plan for the
Edmonds Marsh. Final document will include an ecological assessment and environmental
impact study with input from the public and local organizations.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Plan will directly correlate with goals and recommendations
included in WRIA8 Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan. Co-fund the completion of master
plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water
Management Plan.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Planning/Study $50,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $50,000
47Packet Page 198 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Park Impact Fee Study /
Other Planning Revenue Planning
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Complete a Park Impact Fee study to determine if this is a feasible option to help meet the
parks, recreation, and open space needs of Edmonds projected growth.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
As directed in the Park, Recreation, and Open Space comprehensive plan, explore revenue
strategies for funding improvements of parks, recreation, and cultural facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $30,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $30,000
48Packet Page 199 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park Forest
Management Study
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Hire consultant to develop a plan for best forest management
practices in Pine Ridge Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This forest park is under stress from over-mature trees
especially alder and others. This study will give the Parks Division necessary guidance to
better manage this park to become a more healthy forest and open space.
SCHEDULE: 2014
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $50,000
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $50,000
49Packet Page 200 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
2
6
-
P
a
r
k
s
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
$4
1
7
,
4
5
6
$
4
1
6
,
8
4
9
$
3
1
2
,
4
8
8
$
3
1
0
,
9
0
0
$1
,
0
4
0
,
2
3
7
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
M
a
r
i
n
a
B
c
h
/
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
R
o
o
f
$1
8
2
,
6
9
8
$
1
8
2
,
9
2
8
$
1
8
2
,
5
3
8
$
1
8
1
,
6
7
3
$1
8
0
,
5
5
3
$1
8
4
,
1
7
8
$9
1
1
,
8
7
0
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
P
S
C
C
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
$6
9
,
4
8
0
$6
8
,
0
8
0
$
7
1
,
7
6
8
$
7
0
,
2
2
8
$6
8
,
6
0
5
$6
6
,
9
4
8
$3
4
5
,
6
2
9
De
p
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
F
A
C
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t
$2
9
,
6
7
8
$2
9
,
8
6
0
$
2
9
,
6
2
4
$
2
9
,
7
6
3
$2
9
,
8
7
4
$2
9
,
9
5
7
$1
4
9
,
0
7
8
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
$
6
9
9
,
3
1
2
$
6
9
7
,
7
1
7
$
5
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
5
9
2
,
5
6
4
$
2
7
9
,
0
3
2
$
2
8
1
,
0
8
3
$
0
$
2
,
4
4
6
,
8
1
4
Mi
s
c
.
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
/
L
a
n
d
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wa
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
$2
7
5
,
1
9
2
$7
5
,
8
8
0
$2
2
0
,
9
6
8
Re
a
l
e
s
t
a
t
e
T
a
x
1
/
4
%
/
1
s
t
Q
t
r
%
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
E
a
r
n
i
n
g
s
$3
,
0
0
0
$
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$
7
7
5
,
1
9
2
$
5
7
5
,
8
8
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
2
3
,
9
6
8
$
6
0
3
,
0
0
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
Lo
c
a
l
/
S
t
a
t
e
/
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
D
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
M
i
s
c
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
)
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
S
u
b
s
i
d
y
$0
$
1
2
1
,
8
3
7
$
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
9
2
,
5
6
4
$0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
&
S
u
b
s
i
d
y
$7
7
5
,
1
9
2
$
8
9
7
,
7
1
7
$
7
9
6
,
4
1
8
$
5
9
2
,
5
6
4
$
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
7
2
3
,
9
6
8
$
6
0
3
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
($
6
9
9
,
3
1
2
)
(
$
6
9
7
,
7
1
7
)
(
$
5
9
6
,
4
1
8
)
(
$
5
9
2
,
5
6
4
)
(
$
2
7
9
,
0
3
2
)
(
$
2
8
1
,
0
8
3
)
$0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
$0
(
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
$0
(
$
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
(
$
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$7
5
,
8
8
0
$0
$0
$0
$
1
2
0
,
9
6
8
$
4
2
,
8
8
5
$
2
0
3
,
0
0
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
2
6
9/
1
4
/
2
0
1
1
50Packet Page 201 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,146,126
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
City Hall: $417,000 (2010-2012), $312,000 (2013-2014), debt retired end of 2014
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $182,428
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $69,185
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $29,777
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2011-2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $699,312 $697,717 $596,418 $592,564 $279,032 $281,083 $0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
51Packet Page 202 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open
Space/Land
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens
that fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2011 - 2017
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $400,000
52Packet Page 203 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront/Tidelands
Acquisition
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire waterfront parcels and tidelands wherever feasible to
secure access to Puget Sound for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open
Space Comprehensive Plan
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound
SCHEDULE: 2013
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $200,000
53Packet Page 204 of 253
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
1
3
2
-
P
a
r
k
s
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
C
F
P
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
To
t
a
l
(2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
)
4t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
$0
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
5
,
0
0
0
4t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$
3
8
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
3
8
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
l
a
z
a
$0
$
1
6
8
,
0
0
0
$1
6
8
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$1
,
7
2
7
,
0
0
0
$
2
0
6
,
0
0
0
$2
0
6
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
$0
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ol
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
$1
2
4
,
0
0
0
$0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
S
p
r
a
y
P
a
r
k
$0
$
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
,
8
6
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
8
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
$
2
,
3
8
7
,
0
0
0
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
s
t
)
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
1
7
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$1
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$5
,
0
0
0
$5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
7
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
4
t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
$
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
D
a
y
t
o
n
S
t
.
P
l
a
z
a
$
0
$
1
3
5
,
5
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$
2
9
4
,
0
0
0
$
3
2
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
2
0
0
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$
2
1
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
4
1
2
-
3
0
0
f
o
r
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
O
l
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
$
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
Tr
a
n
s
f
e
r
i
n
f
r
o
m
F
u
n
d
1
2
5
f
o
r
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
$
6
9
4
,
0
0
0
$
1
8
1
,
5
0
0
$
0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
20
1
1
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
20
1
2
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
4
2
0
1
5
2
0
1
6
2
0
1
7
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
(
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
4t
h
A
v
e
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
o
u
r
(
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
/
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
)
$0
$2
4
,
0
0
0
Da
y
t
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
l
a
z
a
(
A
r
t
s
F
e
s
t
.
F
o
u
n
d
.
/
H
u
b
b
a
r
d
T
r
u
s
t
/
E
d
i
n
B
l
o
o
m
)
$
0
$
3
2
,
5
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
C
M
A
C
v
i
a
P
S
R
C
)
$
2
2
1
,
0
0
0
$
2
9
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
(
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
C
M
A
C
v
i
a
S
n
o
.
C
o
.
I
C
C
/
P
S
R
C
)
$
4
3
5
,
0
0
0
$
6
5
,
0
0
0
In
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
T
r
a
i
l
(
S
t
a
t
e
W
W
R
P
)
$
4
9
7
,
0
0
0
$
8
0
,
0
0
0
Ol
d
M
i
l
l
t
o
w
n
:
F
G
C
a
n
d
E
I
B
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
$
1
,
1
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
2
3
0
,
5
0
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Gr
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
4t
h
A
v
e
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
(
s
t
a
t
e
,
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
o
t
h
e
r
)
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Se
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
/
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
(
D
O
E
,
C
D
B
G
)
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
P
a
r
k
S
p
r
a
y
P
a
r
k
(
d
o
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
$2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ye
a
r
l
y
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
n
t
s
/
L
o
a
n
s
S
o
u
g
h
t
(
n
o
t
s
e
c
u
r
e
d
)
$0
$
7
7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
Gr
a
n
t
s
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
$1
,
1
6
7
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
5
,
5
0
0
$0
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
&
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
&
G
r
a
n
t
s
$1
,
8
6
1
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
1
8
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$0
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(1
,
8
6
1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
(
1
,
1
8
7
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
0
.
0
0
(
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
(
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
)
0
.
0
0
$0
En
d
i
n
g
C
a
s
h
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
*P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
1
%
f
o
r
A
r
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
2
0
1
2
-
2
0
1
7
Fu
n
d
1
3
2
9/
2
1
/
2
0
1
1
54Packet Page 205 of 253
PROJECT NAME: 4th Avenue Cultural
Corridor: Planning
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $225,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4th Avenue site design phase 2 for public right of way to build on
phase 1, 2009 design and implementation plan to minimum 30% engineering.
Construction phase to start 2015.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for
the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will
assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the project implementation
phase.
SCHEDULE: 2012, 2014
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study $25,000 $200,000
Engineering & Administration
Construction
1% for Art
TOTAL $25,000 $200,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
55Packet Page 206 of 253
PROJECT NAME: 4th Avenue Cultural
Corridor Project
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,048,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4th Avenue site development with temporary and/or moveable
surface elements and amenities to begin drawing attention and interest to the corridor and create
stronger visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Possible
projects may include surface art, interpretive signage and wayfinding, or low level lighting. The
Cultural Heritage Walking Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park
Service Preserve America grant program, will be implemented in 2011-12..
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will
enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the
downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for
the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will
assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project
implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: 2011, 2012, 2015
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering & Administration
Construction $10,000 $38,000 $1 M
1% for Art
TOTAL $10,000 $38,000 $1 M
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
56Packet Page 207 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Dayton Street Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $135,500
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate small park and plaza at north end of old public works
building, 2nd & Dayton Street. Improve landscaping, plaza, and accessibility.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to public gathering space and
creation of additional art amenities and streetscape improvements in downtown on main
walking route. Financial support from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Hubbard Foundation
and Edmonds in Bloom.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $135,500
1% for Art
TOTAL $135,500
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
57Packet Page 208 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Interurban Trail
Improvements
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,933,000
Matching Grant Funds WWRC/ IAC, additional funding from PSRC / CMAQ
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Trail Improvements
Major construction improvements to this abandoned interurban railway link including 1.37 miles of
trail, upgraded shared roadway, trail spur to Mathay Ballinger Park, and the creation of Ballinger
Station to house a shelter, kiosk, historical interpretation, water fountain and solar bollards.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Final trail system missing link to connect already completed
sections in Shoreline and Mountlake Terrace through the Ballinger neighborhood of Edmonds.
Increased safety and public enjoyment for recreationalists and bicycle commuters.
SCHEDULE: 2011
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $1,727,000 $206,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $1,727,000 $206,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
58Packet Page 209 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Parking
Lot/Drainage
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate South County Senior Center parking lot including
pavement re-surfacing, storm water/drainage management, effective illumination and
landscaping. Seek grant opportunities and partnership opportunities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain capital assets and provide safety
and better accessibility for Seniors.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction $500,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $500,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
59Packet Page 210 of 253
PROJECT NAME: Old Milltown
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $124,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Redevelop the small courtyard/gathering area in front of Old Milltown at 5th and Dayton. The site
is a key gateway into downtown. Elements of the design include raised bed gardens, artistic
elements, a water feature, seating areas, small stage/amphitheatre for performers, integration of
Old Milltown into the gathering area, large boulders for kids to climb on, and a look, smell, feel
educational garden area.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
As a goal in the PROS plan, this project will develop a downtown gathering area, providing an
attractive gateway and entrance area to downtown.
SCHEDULE: 2011
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$12,000
Construction $112,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $124,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
60Packet Page 211 of 253
PROJECT NAME: City Park Spray Park
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate the former site of the City Park wading pool by
constructing a spray park amenity to be used in the summer. These structures have become
very popular in many communities as replacements for wading pools that are no longer
acceptable to increased health department regulations. These installations create no standing
water and therefore require little maintenance and no lifeguard costs. Staff will seek voluntary
donations for construction costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: These amenities are very popular in all communities where
they have been installed. Using the former wading pool site allows existing plumbing, drainage,
pump house, connecting paths and fencing to be used. This will be a much valued attraction that
will increase the popularity of this much loved park.
SCHEDULE: 2012
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction $250,000
1% for Art
TOTAL $250,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts
61Packet Page 212 of 253
FU
N
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
CF
P
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
11
2
S
u
n
s
e
t
Av
e
Wa
l
k
w
a
y
X
To
ha
v
e
a co
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
no
n
mo
t
o
r
i
z
e
d
pa
t
h
fo
r
sc
e
n
i
c
vi
e
w
s
on the west side of
Su
n
s
e
t
fr
o
m
Ma
i
n
St
to
Ca
s
p
e
r
'
s
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
in
the 2008 Parks
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
.
11
6
A
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Lo
c
k
e
r
ro
o
m
an
d
we
i
g
h
t
ro
o
m
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
issue determined
ea
r
l
i
e
r
th
i
s
ye
a
r
.
11
6
F
A
C
En
e
r
g
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
St
u
d
y
Wo
r
k
re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
d
by
EE
C
B
G
to
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
en
e
r
g
y
‐sa
v
i
n
g
projects specifically at
th
e
Fr
a
n
c
i
s
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
.
11
6
EV
Ch
a
r
g
i
n
g
St
a
t
i
o
n
s
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
to
co
v
e
r
th
e
in
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
of
th
e
6 pu
b
l
i
c
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
vehicle charging
st
a
t
i
o
n
.
11
6
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
AD
A
Do
o
r
s
Wo
r
k
to
pr
o
v
i
d
e
au
t
o
m
a
t
i
c
do
o
r
in
t
o
pu
b
l
i
c
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
.
Complete
re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
fr
o
m
gr
a
n
t
s
an
d
do
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
12
5
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ma
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
Cr
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
/
C
r
‐
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
u
d
y
X
Ma
t
c
h
fo
r
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
gr
a
n
t
fr
o
m
SF
R
B
wi
t
h
Pe
o
p
l
e
fo
r
Pu
g
e
t
Sound. Phase I of
la
r
g
e
r
ma
r
s
h
re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
12
5
Pa
r
k
Im
p
a
c
t
Fe
e
St
u
d
y
Pl
a
c
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
fo
r
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
ac
t
i
o
n
on
th
i
s
it
e
m
.
13
2
O
l
d
Mi
l
l
t
o
w
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
mo
v
e
d
fr
o
m
Fu
n
d
12
5
to
Fu
n
d
13
2
.
41
2
‐10
0
W
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
s
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
to
ke
e
p
re
c
o
r
d
s
of
ov
e
r
l
a
y
co
s
t
s
.
41
2
‐10
0
2
0
1
7
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
fu
t
u
r
e
co
s
t
s
fo
r
wa
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
41
2
‐10
0
20
1
8
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
fu
t
u
r
e
co
s
t
s
fo
r
wa
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
41
2
‐10
0
7
6
t
h
Av
e
Wa
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
(i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
PR
V
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
)
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
ne
e
d
s
to
oc
c
u
r
pr
i
o
r
to
ne
w
ov
e
r
l
a
y
by
th
e
City of Lynnwood.
41
2
‐10
0
G
F
C
St
u
d
y
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
ch
a
r
g
e
ra
t
e
st
u
d
y
.
41
2
‐20
0
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ma
r
s
h
/
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
Cr
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
/
C
r
‐
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
St
u
d
y
X
Ma
t
c
h
fo
r
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
gr
a
n
t
fr
o
m
SF
R
B
wi
t
h
Pe
o
p
l
e
fo
r
Pu
g
e
t
Sound. Phase I of
la
r
g
e
r
ma
r
s
h
re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
41
2
‐20
0
Go
o
d
h
o
p
e
Po
n
d
Ba
s
i
n
St
u
d
y
Ci
t
y
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ho
m
e
as
pa
r
t
of
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
se
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
Need basin
pl
a
n
to
ma
n
a
g
e
ru
n
o
f
f
.
41
2
‐20
0
S
W
Pe
r
r
i
n
v
i
l
l
e
Cr
e
e
k
Ba
s
i
n
St
u
d
y
To
de
v
e
l
o
p
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
to
co
s
t
l
y
by
p
a
s
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
41
2
‐20
0
S
t
o
r
m
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
St
u
d
y
‐
Da
y
t
o
n
St
& Hw
y
10
4
De
v
e
l
o
p
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
to
re
d
u
c
e
fr
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
of
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
in
th
i
s
vital part of
Ed
m
o
n
d
s
.
CF
P
/ CI
P
CO
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
(2
0
1
0
TO
20
1
1
)
AD
D
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
3
of
25
3
41
2
‐20
0
S
t
o
r
m
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
St
u
d
y
‐
88
t
h
Av
e
W & 19
4
t
h
St
SW
Ro
o
t
in
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
ha
s
co
m
p
r
o
m
i
s
e
d
st
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
pi
p
e
s
in
th
i
s
area. Pipes need to
be
re
p
l
a
c
e
d
to
pr
e
v
e
n
t
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
.
41
2
‐20
0
S
t
o
r
m
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
St
u
d
y
‐
Da
y
t
o
n
be
t
w
e
e
n
6t
h
& 8t
h
Av
e
N
Fr
e
q
u
e
n
t
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
du
r
i
n
g
la
r
g
e
st
o
r
m
ev
e
n
t
s
in
th
i
s
ar
e
a
.
Needs to be
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
.
41
2
‐30
0
20
1
2
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
Re
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
re
p
a
i
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
t
o
on
e
.
41
2
‐30
0
2
0
1
3
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
Re
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
re
p
a
i
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
t
o
on
e
.
41
2
‐30
0
2
0
1
5
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
Re
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
re
p
a
i
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
t
o
on
e
.
41
2
‐30
0
2
0
1
6
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
Re
h
a
b
/
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
re
p
a
i
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
t
o
on
e
.
41
2
‐30
0
G
F
C
St
u
d
y
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
ch
a
r
g
e
ra
t
e
st
u
d
y
.
No
t
e
:
Pu
b
l
i
c
Ma
r
k
e
t
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
ad
d
i
n
g
pr
o
j
e
c
t
to
th
e
pa
r
k
s
CF
P
an
d
th
e
12
5
Parks Fund.
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
4
of
25
3
FU
N
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
NA
M
E
CF
P
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
11
2
I
n
t
e
r
u
r
b
a
n
Tr
a
i
l
X
Mo
v
e
d
to
Fu
n
d
13
2
.
41
2
‐10
0
2
4
‐in
c
h
Tr
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Ma
i
n
Is
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
Va
l
v
e
s
Ad
d
e
d
to
20
1
0
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
.
41
2
‐10
0
N
e
w
59
6
‐42
0
PR
V
St
a
t
i
o
n
Ad
d
e
d
to
20
1
0
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
.
41
2
‐10
0
A
M
R
Me
t
e
r
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
St
u
d
y
Do
no
t
ha
v
e
th
e
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
to
su
p
p
o
r
t
th
i
s
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
.
41
2
‐20
0
S
h
e
l
l
a
b
a
r
g
e
r
Cr
k
/
W
i
l
l
o
w
Cr
k
/
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
Ma
r
s
h
10
0
‐ye
a
r
fl
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
de
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
st
u
d
y
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
ab
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
:
Pa
i
d
fo
r
Ka
r
l
s
t
e
n
ho
u
s
e
in
20
1
1
.
41
2
‐30
0
22
4
t
h
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
A
l
d
e
r
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
B
e
a
c
h
Pl
a
c
e
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
D
e
l
l
w
o
o
d
Dr
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
2
0
0
t
h
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
2
1
6
t
h
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
7
2
n
d
Av
e
W Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
7
6
t
h
Av
e
W Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
8
t
h
Av
e
S Se
w
e
r
Re
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
41
2
‐30
0
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
7
t
h
Av
e
N Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
2
4
0
t
h
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
76
t
h
Av
e
W,
Ba
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
W
a
l
n
u
t
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
N
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
Tr
a
c
t
i
o
n
RO
W
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
7
1
1
7
17
6
t
h
St
SW
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
8
0
1
5
19
6
t
h
St
SW
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
4
6
5
Ad
m
i
r
a
l
Wa
y
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
1
0
5
3
Al
d
e
r
St
Se
w
e
r
41
2
‐30
0
2
3
8
t
h
St
Se
w
e
r
Me
r
g
e
d
in
t
o
20
1
6
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
41
2
‐30
0
B
r
o
o
k
m
e
r
e
Se
w
e
r
Se
w
e
r
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
no
t
ne
e
d
e
d
.
CF
P
/ CI
P
CO
M
P
A
R
I
S
O
N
(2
0
1
0
TO
20
1
1
)
Me
r
g
e
d
in
t
o
20
1
2
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Me
r
g
e
d
in
t
o
20
1
3
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Me
r
g
e
d
in
t
o
20
1
5
Se
w
e
r
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
DE
L
E
T
E
D
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
Pa
c
k
e
t
Pa
g
e
21
5
of
25
3
DRAFT
Subject to October 12th Approval
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
September 28, 2011
Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety
Complex, 250 – 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Philip Lovell, Chair (excused)
John Reed, Vice Chair
Todd Cloutier
Kristiana Johnson
Neil Tibbott
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Kevin Clarke
Bill Ellis (excused)
Valerie Stewart (excused)
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Rob English, City Engineer
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Karin Noyes, Recorder
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
VICE CHAIR REED MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 24, 2011 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED.
BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
There was no one in the audience.
PUBLIC HEARING ON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) ELEMENT UPDATE FOR 2012-2017 TO CITY’S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FOR 2012-2017 (FILE NUMBER
AMD20110006)
Mr. English described the differences between the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
CFP is mandated under the Growth Management Act and contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new
capital facilities in order to accommodate the City’s projected population growth. Maintenance projects that preserve existing
capital facilities are not included in the CFP. The CFP is updated annually to identify capital projects for at least the next six
year and out to 2025 that support the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CIP is not mandated by State law and is done for
budget reasons. The projects identified in the CIP are tied to the budget that will be presented to the City Council on October
4th. The timeframe for the CIP projects is six years. He also provided a diagram to illustrate the similarities and differences
between the two documents.
Packet Page 216 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 2
Mr. English advised that the proposed CFP has three project sections comprised of General, Transportation and Utilities. The
CIP has two sections related to general and parks projects, and each project list is organized by the City’s financial fund
numbers. He referred the Board to Exhibit 3, which identifies the projects that are proposed to be added or deleted from the
CFP and CIP. He specifically noted the following additions:
• The Sunset Avenue Walkway Project was added to the CFP. The purpose of the project is to provide a continuous
non-motorized path for scenic views on the west side of Sunset Avenue from Main Street to Casper Street. The
project is identified in the 2008 Parks Comprehensive Plan. It has also been included in the Transportation Master
Plan and some preliminary work has been done. The estimated cost of the project is $917,000. It is identified in the
CFP for design in 2015 and construction in 2016. Staff anticipates securing grants for this project, but no funding is
available at this time. Staff will prepare a conceptual design for the sidewalk improvements associated with the
project. A survey of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and street rights-of-way indicates that a coordination
effort will be necessary.
• A feasibility study of Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Creek/Willow Creek was also added to the CFP. This project is
supported by the 2010 Stormwater Plan and falls under Phase 1 of the larger Edmonds Marsh Restoration and
Willow Creek Daylighting Projects. The purpose of the study is to identify the scope of improvements that could be
done to improve fish passage and water flow. The estimated cost of the study is $200,000, and the City has applied
for a $100,000 grant from the Salmon Recovery Board in conjunction with People for Puget Sound. The City’s
matching funds would come from both the Stormwater Utility Fund and the Parks Fund. If grant funding is secured,
the study should move forward in 2012.
• In November 2010, the City Council approved the 2011-2016 CIP with an amendment to add a public market facility
in the downtown waterfront area as part of the 2012-2017 CIP process. However, no direction was provided on
which capital fund the project should be added to, how much should be allowed for the project, or when the project
should move forward. Staff has researched the best way to add this project to both the CIP and CFP and found that
the project is actually identified in the 2008 Parks Plan under “regional park for the downtown waterfront.” Staff
believes this reference provides the nexus to add the project to the Parks CFP and the 125 Real Estate Excise Tax
(REET) Park Improvement Fund in the CIP.
Mr. English advised that the CIP identifies both capital and maintenance projects. He referred to a chart outlining the various
capital funds that are managed by the Public Works, Parks and Recreation and Community Services Departments. He
specifically highlighted the following funds:
112 Transportation Fund
• 226th Street Walkway Project. This 300-foot section of walkway has been completed.
• Shell Valley Emergency Road. This project is currently under construction and is anticipated for completion by the
end of 2011.
• Dayton Street Overlay. This project is tied into a 2011 water main replacement project that is currently under
construction. Once the water main project is finished, the roadway overlay project can commence.
• Main Street from 5th Avenue to 6th Avenue. The City secured grant funding for this project in 2010. The project is
intended to improve Main Street by replacing sidewalks and adding street lighting, flower basket poles, and other
amenities. The preliminary design phase has been initiated, and they anticipate construction will start in the fall of
2012.
• 228th Street Corridor Improvements. Design work for this project has commenced.
• Five Corners Roundabout. Design work for this project has also started.
• 212th Street and 76th Avenue. The City is nearly ready to issue a Request for Qualifications, and they plan to start the
design process later in 2011.
412-100 Utility Fund – Water
• The City has awarded two construction projects that will replace over 17,000 feet of water mains.
Packet Page 217 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 3
• Starting in 2012, 5,900 feet of water main will be replaced each year, which is a more typical replacement program
going forward.
• The Alderwood Meter Improvement Project has been completed.
412-200 Utility Fund – Stormwater
• The 12th Avenue Storm Drainage Improvement Project has been completed.
• The Dayton Street Storm Drainage Improvement Project is under construction. There are some sections of pipe
where access is limited. Therefore, exposing and replacing the pipe is not feasible. Rather than replacing the
infrastructure, the City will rehabilitate the pipe using a cured-in-place lining.
• The Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvement Project is scheduled to start in 2012.
412-300 Utility Fund – Sewer
• Upgrades to Sewer Lift Station 2 are currently under construction. It is anticipated the project will be completed by
the end of 2011.
• Nine sewer lift stations would be rehabilitated in 2012 and 2013.
• Nearly 3,000 feet of sewer main will be replaced or rehabilitated starting in 2012.
• The Sewer Comprehensive Plan needs to be updated in 2012. The current version was adopted in 2006.
Ms. Hite highlighted the 2011 park projects that were funded by the 125 Park Fund (REET) as follows:
• The Yost Pool Repair Project was completed on time and under budget.
• Groundbreaking occurred for the Interurban Trail Project and significant progress has already been made. The
project will continue into the fall, with anticipated completion by the end of 2011.
• As directed by the City Council, the Old Mill Town Project is underway, and a groundbreaking ceremony is
scheduled for September 30th at 1:00 p.m.
• Francis Chapin has been working diligently with a consultant to design the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project, and
they anticipate going into full planning in 2012.
Ms. Hite reminded the Board that, as requested by the City Council, staff is proposing that the Public Market Project be added
to the CFP. She noted that this project could be classified as an additional waterfront feature, which is identified in the 2008
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. Adding the project to the CFP will acknowledge the City Council’s decision and
allow the City to start the planning process.
Ms. Hite said the City has also been working with representatives from the Edmonds School District, Mountlake Terrace, and
Lynnwood regarding a potential regional athletic complex at the old Woodway High School site. They believe the project
would be competitive for grant funding. She anticipates that community discussions will continue, and it is important for the
City to allocate some funding for the project and to participate in future discussions.
Ms. Hite advised that the proposed CIP reprioritizes the projects identified in the Park 125 Fund, but no new projects were
added. The additions include:
• The 2011-2016 CIP identifies playground equipment replacement at City Park and completion of the Dayton Street
Plaza in 2011. These projects were bumped to 2012.
• Funding for the Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Creek/Willow Creek Feasibility Study was added to provide matching
funds for grant opportunities.
• A Park Impact Fee Study was added as a placeholder if the City Council chooses to move forward with the study.
They will discuss the concept further before the end of 2011. If the City Council decides against the study, the
money will be reallocated.
• $120,000 was identified for the Yost Pool Boiler Replacement Project in 2012 rather than waiting three to four years
as originally planned.
Packet Page 218 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 4
Next, Ms. Hite noted that the Park Construction Fund 132 does not have any revenues coming in other than those transferred
from Park Fund 125 (REET) and grants. It is intended to be a construction fund to track capital projects. Projects identified
in this fund include:
• Dollars from Park Fund 125 would be transferred to Park Construction Fund 132 to pay for the 4th Avenue Cultural
Corridor Planning Project. Grant money would also be placed in this fund.
• Money from Park Fund 125 was transferred to the Park Construction Fund 132 for the Dayton Street Plaza Project to
match community grant funding that has already been received.
• Grant funding for the Interurban Trail Project was also added to Park Construction Fund 132.
• The City has applied for, but has not secured grant funding for the Spray Park Project and the Senior Center
Improvement Project.
Mr. English distributed two revised pages: Page 44 of the CFP regarding the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project, and Page 58
of the CIP related to the Interurban Trail Project.
Mr. English reviewed that after the public hearing, staff would like the Board to forward a recommendation regarding the CIP
and CFP to the City Council. He noted that a public hearing has been scheduled before the City Council on October 4th.
Once approved, the CFP would be adopted as part of the 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, which must take place by
the end of December.
THERE WAS NO ONE IN ATTENDANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THEREFORE, THE
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Vice Chair Reed asked the correct procedure for forwarding Board Member comments regarding the proposed CFP and CIP
to the City Council. Mr. English answered that staff would forward the Board’s comments to the City Council for
consideration as part of their review during the public hearing process.
Board Member Cloutier recalled that when the Stormwater Master Plan was reviewed and updated in 2010, projects related to
the waterfront were intentionally given a higher priority. One of these projects was the 100-Year Floodplain Delineation
Study. He asked if this study would be completed in the near future. Mr. English reported that the City decided not to move
forward with the 100-Year Floodplain Delineation Study. Instead, the City plans to pursue the Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger
Creek/Willow Creek Feasibility Study, for which grant opportunities are available. This study would look at fish habitat and
potential improvements to the marsh, as well as water flow.
Board Member Johnson referred to Page 3 of Exhibit 3, which states that the 100-Year Floodplain Delineation Study was
abandoned. Instead, the funds were used to purchase the Karlsten property. Mr. English advised that the Karlsten property
has been the subject of flooding issues for years. The City purchased the property as part of a settlement agreement. Board
Member Johnson asked clarification of whether the floodplain delineation study had been postponed or abandoned. Again,
Mr. English advised that the City is hoping to secure grant funding for a feasibility study that will focus on habitat and water
passage through the marsh.
Board Member Cloutier expressed concern that the City has plans to move ahead with drainage problems in the downtown
waterfront area before a floodplain delineation study has been completed. Mr. English clarified that no drainage projects have
been proposed in the downtown waterfront area. The purpose of the feasibility study is to identify future projects to address
the existing problems.
Chair Lovell expressed concern about projects such as fixing the drainage in the Senior Center parking lot and overlaying
Dayton Street after the new water line has been installed. He suggested that these projects are cosmetic fixes that do not
address the main issue of flooding that exists in the area. He emphasized that a floodplain delineation study must be
completed before any significant redevelopment can take place in this area. Mr. English pointed out that the CIP identifies
$150,000 in 2012 and $500,000 in 2013 for a Dayton Street and SR-104 Storm Drainage Alternatives Study and
Implementation. He noted that this is the intersection where most of the flooding problems occur during heavy rains. He
explained that this study would focus on how to get the stormwater out to the Sound during heavy storms. The floodplain
Packet Page 219 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 5
delineation study would identify the elevation for flooding during a 100-year storm, but it would not offer any solutions. The
City’s goal is to identify solutions to reduce and eliminate flooding in the future.
Chair Lovell referred to the Main Street Pedestrian Lighting Project from 5th to 6th Avenues. He noted that $83,612 was
allocated for 2011, and $890.388 was identified for 2012. He questioned why so much money would be allocated for a
lighting project. Mr. English said this project would also include sidewalk replacement, street tree replacement, water main
replacement and other amenities. The City is also interested in relocating the overhead utilities. He noted the City has
received grant funding to add two electric vehicle charging stations at the intersection of 6th Avenue and Main Street. He
summarized that the City has submitted an application to the Transportation Improvement Board for grant funding for this
project, and they will also pursue a direct allocation from the State Legislature in 2012. The final project scope will be based
on available funding.
Board Member Johnson requested more information about the potential of undergrounding the utilities on Main Street
between 5th and 6th Avenues. Mr. English said underground utilities would be the City’s preference, but he recognized the
cost is significant and may not be feasible. The City’s second choice would be relocate the utilities to the alley south of Main
Street. Board Member Johnson asked if staff has considered using a local improvement district to fund the underground
utility component of the project. Mr. English said staff has considered this option, but the cost of undergrounding utilities is
extremely high, and the option would not likely be feasible given the low number of businesses that would be required to
contribute to the fund. However, he agreed to research the option further.
Chair Lovell requested more information about the public market concept. Again, Mr. English advised that the City Council
asked that this item be added to the CIP as part of the 2011 process. Staff is recommending that it be added to both
documents. They will seek further direction from the City Council. Chair Lovell asked if a potential location for the market
has been identified. Mr. English answered that no specific location has been identified, but the City Council indicated that it
should be in the vicinity of the general downtown waterfront area.
Vice Chair Reed asked how the upcoming levy would impact the CIP and CFP. He noted that, as currently proposed, there
would be no funding for street overlays over the next three years. Mr. English said potential funding associated with the levy
was not programmed into the CIP. If the levy is approved by voters, the CIP would be updated to incorporate the additional
$1 million. He emphasized that the additional funding would be placed in the 116 Fund (Building Maintenance), but the City
Council has not made any decisions as to exactly how the money would be allocated.
Vice Chair Reed asked about the projects that were identified as part of the proposed transportation funding package that was
voted down by the citizens of Edmonds. Mr. English answered that many of the projects in the proposed CFP were included
as part of the transportation funding package, but no funding has been identified.
Vice Chair Reed observed that if the levy is approved, the Parks fund would receive an additional $500,000, which would be
used to fund maintenance projects that have been deferred. Ms. Hite agreed that the additional funding would be placed in a
separate account to upgrade parks and address some of the City’s deferred maintenance issues.
Chair Lovell asked how the Haines Wharf contractor’s request for equitable adjustment is identified in the CIP. Ms. Hite
answered that it was not identified in the proposed CIP because they do not have a projection for what this cost will be. When
the City gets closer to closing the project and figuring out the claim for equitable adjustment, the CIP will need to be modified
to identify where the money would come from.
Chair Lovell requested information about the scope of work associated with the Civic Center Complex Improvement Project.
Ms. Hite explained that while the property is owned by the Edmonds School District, the City leases the property for the
community’s use. Therefore, the City is responsible for all maintenance costs, including turf repairs. The current lease
expires in 2020, and staff is working with the school district to either negotiate a new lease or acquire the property. As
currently proposed, $5,000 has been identified in 2011 for minor improvements, and $75,000 would be used in 2013 to
replace the playground equipment. She noted that the CIP also identifies minor improvements and replacement of playground
equipment at Marina Beach Park.
Packet Page 220 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 6
Chair Lovell asked if improvements to the Old Woodway High School playfield have been approved by the
Edmonds School District. Ms. Hite answered that the project is in the conceptual stage, and City staff will continue to work
with Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood and the school district to submit grant applications for funding. She noted that the
property is owned by the Department of Natural Resources and controlled by the school district.
Board Member Tibbott requested additional information about the proposed improvements to the Boys and Girls Club. Ms.
Hite advised that the property is located on the Civic Center Campus, which is primarily owned by the school district.
However, the City does own the building and the ground it sits on. The CFP identifies future replacement of the building.
Chair Lovell referred to Page 23 of the CIP, which identifies total revenues for the 125 Park Fund. He asked if these numbers
are only accurate if grant funding is secured. Ms. Hite answered that the numbers are only accurate if all of the anticipated
revenues are obtained and all the expenditures are made. Chair Lovell asked if the ending cash balance gets carried over to
the next year, and Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Ms. Hite noted that some projects identified in the 2011 CIP were
postponed because Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenues were less than projected. She explained that the City manages
Park Fund 125 based on revenues. They will not ambitiously start all the projects identified in Park Fund 125 in early 2012.
Instead, the projects will be started throughout the year as funding is available. The goal is to end with a positive cash
balance.
Board Member Johnson pointed out that $30,000 has been budgeted in 2013 for a Cultural Arts Facility Needs Study. While
the CIP cross references this project to the CFP, it has not been included in the CFP. Ms. Hite advised that there has been
some community discussion regarding an arts facility that brings a historical perspective to the arts. The $30,000 amount was
included as a placeholder to allow the planning effort to start. She agreed that the project should also be reflected in the CFP.
Vice Chair Reed asked if any of the projects identified in the 116 Building Maintenance Fund include staff salaries, or would
third-party contractors be used to perform the maintenance work. Mr. English answered that Jim Stevens, Facilities
Manager, is responsible for the projects identified in the 116 Building Maintenance Fund. Currently, three City employees
perform facility maintenance, but he is not familiar with whether or not they bill their time to individual projects.
Vice Chair Reed observed that given the size, age and use of the City’s facilities, it appears that not nearly enough money has
been allocated to properly maintain the structures. This means the buildings will deteriorate sooner. It is always frustrating to
see the large number of maintenance projects that need to be done and the lack of funding to move forward. He said he hopes
this issue can be a topic of discussion during the Strategic Planning process to identify opportunities to obtain more revenue.
He also cautioned that establishing local improvement districts to fund certain projects can appear to nickel and dime property
owners in other ways than property taxes.
Vice Chair Reed noted that the current Civic Center lease expires in 2021, which is only ten years away. He emphasized that
this property is a significant asset to the City, and they should start working now on a new lease or potential acquisition. Ms.
Hite said that in her discussions with the school district, they have indicated they are not interested in selling the property, but
they would likely support a long-term lease with the City. She advised that the City would likely need a 50-year lease at a
reasonable rate to justify the expense of improving the facility. At this time, the school district does not have any plans to
utilize the property for a school use.
Chair Lovell observed that recent events indicate there may still be some concern about the proposed the roundabout at Five
Corners. He noted that while some grant funding has been secured for design work, funding for construction would not be
available for at least two to four years. Mr. English clarified that the City has secured grant funding for design and right-of-
way acquisition in 2011 through 2013. He explained that the Transportation Improvement Plan requires that all projects
identified for the first three years must have secured funding. Because the City has not yet secured funding for construction of
the roundabout at Five Corners, the project is identified for construction in 2015. The City is not required to have secure
funding for the projects identified for the last three years of the plan.
Chair Lovell said there appears to be some question as to the necessity of the roundabout at Five Corners. Mr. English
explained that this intersection has a concurrency problem. The current Level of Service (LOS) F during the PM peak hour is
below the City’s standard. The Transportation Improvement Plan identifies a need to raise the LOS at this intersection, and a
Packet Page 221 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 7
roundabout has been identified as an ideal fit for the situation. The other option would be a signalized intersection, which
would be difficult. Movement would be limited to one direction at a time because there are five streets intersecting in this one
location. A roundabout would also allow for safer pedestrian crossings. He noted that the project design has been funded by
a Federal Air Quality Improvement Grant. It has been found that roundabouts result in cleaner air because cars do not have to
sit and idle while waiting to cross through an intersection. He emphasized the need to educate the public to help them
understand the benefits of the proposed roundabout. Chair Lovell asked about the City’s anticipated source of funding for the
roundabout construction. Mr. English answered that once the right-of-way acquisition and design work is finished, City staff
would submit applications for grant funding to construct the project.
Board Member Johnson said she appreciates Mr. English’s explanation about the benefits of the roundabout, which appears to
make sense from an engineering standpoint. However, her recollection from participating in the Transportation Plan update
process is that the community is split 50/50 in support and opposition to the project. She suggested that the design and right-
of-way acquisition phase provides a good time for the community to weigh in on whether or not they think the roundabout is a
good project. If they wait until the project is ready for construction, it will be too late. She recalled that the Transportation
Plan Update committee originally recommended that the consultant look at an interim project, but this idea did not get into the
final approved Transportation Plan. She suggested it would be appropriate to look at other alternatives as part of the design
and right-of-way acquisition phase, since the information could be used to either defend and/or explain the project.
Board Member Johnson observed that because of the geometry of this intersection, it has a low accident rate. She added that
even when 220th Street was under construction and traffic was diverted to Five Corners, there was not a spike in the number of
accidents even though the traffic nearly doubled. She suggested the City actually has three options for addressing the LOS
requirement:
1. Make improvements to meet the LOS Standard.
2. Do nothing and require future developers in the area to pay for the needed improvement.
3. Change the LOS Standard, perhaps allowing an exception for this one intersection.
Board Member Johnson expressed her belief that in order to really evaluate the intersection properly, the City must measure
the stop time delay. From her understanding, only the westbound approach to 212th has a delay problem at this time. She
questioned if there are other alternatives to the way the intersection is utilized that could affect the average intersection stop
delay. She summarized that the roundabout project is of great interest to the community, and she wants the City to be as
prepared as possible to answer the questions that may come up in the future.
Vice Chair Reed said it would be helpful to provide graphic information to the public to illustrate how the roundabout might
look and work in this location. Board Member Johnson advised that this information has already been presented to the public.
Vice Chair Reed said it would also be helpful to illustrate how pedestrian traffic would move through the roundabout
intersection. Mr. English agreed that this information would be helpful to educate the public on the benefits of a roundabout
and how it would function. Because the design work is still in the preliminary stages, the actual layout of the roundabout has
not been established yet. He emphasized that the proposed roundabout at Five Corners should not be confused with the
existing traffic circle at the fountain area in downtown Edmonds. The fountain intersection is not considered an engineered
roundabout.
Mr. English observed that the Board raised a lot of good questions and concerns. He asked that they summarize the concerns
they would like staff to present to the City Council. The Board summarized their specific concerns as follows:
1. It is important to make sure money is not wasted in the area of drainage and infrastructure in the downtown
waterfront area. These problems need to be resolved long term in order for redevelopment to take place.
2. The Five Corners roundabout is a reoccurring community concern. It was brought up during the Five Corners
Neighborhood Activity Center Study. At that time, a video was provided to illustrate how a roundabout operates,
and preliminary sketches were provided to illustrate the land that would need to be acquired to accommodate the
roundabout. Even with the information provided, there was still a significant amount of controversy.
3. A public education program is necessary to help the public understand the benefits of a roundabout and to gain
support for the project.
Packet Page 222 of 253
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
August 24, 2011 Page 8
Board Member Johnson noted that $20,000 was identified in 2012 for a Transportation Plan update. Mr. Chave explained
that it is time for the City to review future land use patterns in preparation for the next Comprehensive Plan update. This
money would be used to hire a consultant to help staff extend the projections in the Transportation Plan out to 2035 and
perhaps beyond. However, the update will not involve reworking the policies.
VICE CHAIR REED MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
AND DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF
APPROVAL BASED ON THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE BOARD. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARING ON POTENTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MEDICAL/HIGHWAY 99 ACTIVITY CENTER TO REMOVE
EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGNATED AREAS FROM THE ACTIVITY CENTER (FILE NUMBER
AMD20100024)
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Vice Chair Reed did not provide any comments during this portion of the meeting.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The Board meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Packet Page 223 of 253
AM-4245 Item #: 11.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted By:Phil Williams
Department:Public Works
Review
Committee:
Community/Development Services Committee
Action:
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Further discussion and potential action on a proposed change order policy for the City of
Edmonds that will guide processing and approval by the administration and City Council.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Review draft policy provided by staff. Discuss and modify a chosen policy and then approve it for
inclusion within the City's existing purchasing policy document.
Previous Council Action
A draft change order policy was presented by staff to council as part of the discussion dealing with
Haines Wharf Project at the August 23rd, 2011 Council Meeting. The policy was further discussed as a
stand-alone agenda item at the September 20th, 2011 Council meeting.
Narrative
A draft change order policy (attached) was presented by staff to Council as part of the discussion dealing
with Haines Wharf Project at the August 23rd, 2011 Council Meeting. The policy was further discussed
as a stand-alone agenda item at the September 20th, 2011 Council meeting. At the 9/20/11 meeting
Council reviewed and commented on the most recent version of a proposed policy to review and approve
necessary change orders on City contracts. City Council indicated a desire for a simpler policy that would
be easier to understand and communicate. Councilmember Petso offered at that meeting to assist staff in
re-writing the policy to accomplish that goal. Ms. Petso prepared a new draft and sent it to staff for
review. Staff has no objection to the new, shorter policy and recommends its approval.
Attachments
Proposed Change Order Policy
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 08:21 AM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/30/2011 09:27 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:47 AM
Form Started By: Phil Williams Started On: 09/29/2011 04:29 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/30/2011
Packet Page 224 of 253
Change Order Policy
City Council members shall be notified by e-mail of any change order in excess of
$50,000.
City Council approval shall be required for:
(1) any change order in excess of $100,000, or
(2) any change order which puts the total of change orders on a project over the
designated management reserve.
If City Council approval is required for a change order, but circumstances require a
speedier approval, the Mayor is authorized to approve the required work Provided That
the change order is placed on the next City Council agenda for review and approval.
In no event may the budget authority for a project be exceeded without prior City Council
approval.
Packet Page 225 of 253
AM-4242 Item #: 12.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted By:Sandy Chase
Department:City Clerk's Office
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Discussion and possible action regarding BD1 retail only zone. (Public comment will be
received.)
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Previous Council Action
The City Council discussed this topic on August 23, 2011, and made the following motion:
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETERSON,
TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO EXCLUDE OFFICE USES FROM
THE STORE FRONTS IN THE BD1 ZONE.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3); COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PETERSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO,
FRALEY-MONILLAS AND PLUNKETT VOTING NO.
Narrative
Attached for your reference is a copy of the proposed Code amendments along with the minutes from the
August 23, 2011 City Council Meeting on this topic.
Attachments
Proposed Code Amendments - Retail Only
08-23-11 City Council Minutes (Excerpt)
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/30/2011 09:27 AM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/30/2011 09:47 AM
Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 09/29/2011
Final Approval Date: 09/30/2011
Packet Page 226 of 253
1
Chapter 16.43
BD – DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
Sections:
16.43.000 Purposes.
16.43.010 Subdistricts.
16.43.020 Uses.
16.43.030 Site development standards.
16.43.035 Design standards – BD1 zone.
16.43.040 Operating restrictions.
16.43.000
Purposes.
The BD zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for
business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40 ECDC:
A. Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated
businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a
destination for visitors from throughout the region.
B. Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest
pedestrian links and pedestrian-oriented design elements, while protecting downtown’s identity.
C. Identify supporting arts and mixed use residential and office areas which support and
complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown’s
focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the
area surrounding this retail core area.
D. Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for
the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multifamily residential uses. [Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
16.43.010
Subdistricts.
The “downtown business” zone is subdivided into five distinct subdistricts, each intended to
implement specific aspects of the comprehensive plan that pertain to the Downtown Waterfront
Activity Center. Each subdistrict contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning regulations, as
described in this chapter. The five subdistricts are:
BD1 – Downtown Retail Core;
BD2 – Downtown Mixed Commercial;
BD3 – Downtown Convenience Commercial;
BD4 – Downtown Mixed Residential;
BD5 – Downtown Arts Corridor. [Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
Packet Page 227 of 253
2
16.43.020
Uses.
A. Table 16.43-1.
Permitted Uses BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales A A A A A
Offices (including professional offices)A1 A A A A
Service uses (including banking and real estate businesses)A A A A A
Restaurants and food service establishments A A A A A
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage
areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a
new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment
storage, sales or services
X X X X X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and
on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant
or food service establishment that also provides an on-site
retail outlet open to the public
A A A A A
Automobile sales and service X A A X X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only
nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents
C A A A X
Printing, publishing and binding establishments C A A A C
Community-oriented open air markets conducted as an
outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions in the
Edmonds City Code
A A A A A
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling A A A A A
Multiple dwelling unit(s) A A A A A
Other Uses
Bus stop shelters A A A A A
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A
Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of
ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R)
A A A A A
Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC
17.100.050
C C C A C
Packet Page 228 of 253
3
Permitted Uses BD1 BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5
Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community
parks with an adopted master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070
A A A A A
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B B B B B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility
otherwise permitted in this zone
B B B B X
Commercial parking lots C C C C X
Wholesale uses X X C X X
Hotels and motels A A A A A
Amusement establishments C C C C C
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C C C C C
Drive-in or drive-through businesses CX C A C X
Laboratories X C C C X
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as
a permitted use
X X C X X
Day-care centers C C C A C
Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes,
sanitariums
X C C A X
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do
not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined
in ECDC 21.85.033
A A A A A
Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not
meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in
ECDC 21.85.033
C C C C A
Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for
current alcoholics and drug abusers
X C C A X
Regional parks and community parks without a master plan
subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070
C C C C C
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D D D D D
Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC D D D D D
Notes:
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
X = Not permitted
1 = Office uses in the BD1 zone may not be located within a designated street front
Packet Page 229 of 253
4
For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets
the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria
are met:
1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular
access shall only be provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it
shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and
designed to be as unobtrusive as possible.
2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street
and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height
along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice
pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use
shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following:
a. Architectural features or details;
b. Artwork;
c. Landscaping. [Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008].
Packet Page 230 of 253
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 23, 2011
Page 13
specifically audit this project. Mayor Cooper advised Mr. Taraday, the City Clerk and he will provide
responses to Councilmember Bernheim’s questions.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented she was speechless. She believes this will be looked at in a
thorough manner. She looked forward to determining how to proceed in the future and appreciated Mr.
Williams’ input regarding a policy to avoid this in the future. She wondered if the Council would have
stopped the project if they knew the overruns were this high; remarking the Council should have been
given the opportunity to make that decision.
Councilmember Wilson commented the Auditor is not the appropriate arbiter of whether something is
legal or illegal. Before the next Council meeting he suggested a definitive answer be provided by
someone outside the City, whether that was an investigation by the Office of the Attorney General or the
King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office or some other entity. He summarized it was not appropriate
for the Council or Mayor to pass judgment regarding what was legal or illegal.
Councilmember Plunkett suggested scheduling an Executive Session with regard to what is legal and
illegal, whether to pursue an investigation, etc. Mr. Taraday answered if the Council was contemplating
whether the City has a cause of action that would be appropriately discussed in Executive Session as
would be the defense regarding the request for equitable adjustment. Councilmember Plunkett
commented Mr. Williams, Mr. Taraday and Mayor Cooper made every effort to make the information
public as soon as they received it. The Council now needs to discuss how to proceed in Executive
Session.
Council President Peterson scheduled an Executive Session on September 6, 2011 at 6:00 p.m.
Mayor Cooper advised staff will answer the questions asked by the Council and schedule review of a
purchasing policy on a future agenda.
(Councilmember Wilson did not participate in the following items.)
7. POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO DOWNTOWN BD ZONES.
Planning Manager Rob Chave advised the Community Services/Development Service Committee
discussed this at their recent meeting and forwarded three of the Planning Board recommendations to the
Council for further consideration. Development agreements are not part of this agenda item and will be
scheduled for a future Council work session.
Council President Peterson clarified tonight’s discussion did not include development agreements. The
City Attorney will review the issue of development agreements and make further recommendations. Mr.
Chave advised the City Attorney will provide background on development agreements at a future work
session. Council President Peterson advised he has been working with Mr. Taraday to schedule a work
session on land use issues.
Councilmember Bernheim provided a PowerPoint presentation. He expressed support for the 45-foot
depth for the storefronts and not allowing offices on the ground floor in the retail core. He did not support
removing the step backs in the BD zone, at least at this point; and did not support allowing buildings as
tall as 35 feet along the main retail corridors, Fifth Avenue and Main Street, noting he had seen no
research or evidence proving these are good ideas. He provided photographs supporting his research that
step backs are highly desirable and are necessary to preserve human scale, noting step backs are required
in Kirkland and Friday Harbor. As support for his opposition to 35-foot buildings, he provided
photographs of 1-2 story buildings along main shopping streets in Kirkland and Edmonds. He provided
several photographs of buildings he liked.
Packet Page 231 of 253
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 23, 2011
Page 14
Councilmember Bernheim said he would not approve an increase in height limits on the main retail
shopping streets just to keep a post office or build a boutique hotel. He envisioned the sky, the air above,
the view, the pedestrian scale, trees taller than buildings as the City’s “seed corn,” the City’s heritage and
the tourism golden egg and he would not sell it for the promise that residents could “save a buck on
property taxes.” He suggested the following ideas be considered before approving a permanent height
increase:
• Limit the width of buildings on the street front (to break up buildings into smaller pieces)
• Measure height from the main street instead of the center of the lot (so the height of the
building slopes with the street)
• Develop the alleys (to provide more storefront)
• Limit the volume of the building to, e.g., 250% of the lot size (to give builder flexibility, but
control maximum building mass)
• Underground utility wires
• Replace some on-street parking with a pedestrian pathway
Councilmember Bernheim proposed the following:
1. Anywhere downtown, amend the Code to allow an extra 3 feet for solar panels (the City already
allows unlimited extra height for church steeples, 3 feet for elevator penthouses and chimneys,
18” for vent pipes, and 30” for stand pipes. ECDC 21.40.030).
2. Maximum building height for lots in any BD zone should be between two and four stories
• Stories above the second story should be set back 45 feet along Main Street and Fifth Avenue
to match the recommended depth of the retail space.
• All development in the BD zone above two stories requires ADB review after new guidelines
are adopted.
• Two stories along the main retail streets will protect human scale and pedestrian orientation.
• Four stories everywhere in the BD zone with ADB approval except the valuable shopping
streets.
3. Eliminate three-hour free parking
• In BD-1 zone, 2 hours free, pay for anything over that, up to 4 hours.
• In other downtown zones, to create commuter, transit-oriented parking, 2 hours free, pay for
anything over that, up to 14 hours.
Councilmember Bernheim suggested holding a town hall meeting where residents can be heard, and can
work together to find common ground. He summarized economic development does not require changing
the zoning code to allow taller buildings. Building heights can be raised but only if residents support that
change in the community character. To promote economic development, zoning codes should be
predictable and fair; there are many more solutions than raising building heights along main historical
town streets.
Councilmember Petso commented earlier this week she sent an email to some Councilmembers, Mr.
Chave, Mr. Taraday, Mr. Clifton and Mayor Cooper conveying her analysis that the building height limit
was 25 feet but the proposed amendments to Section C2 and C3 would change the height limit to 30 feet.
Previously those sections allowed 30 feet with step backs for pitched roofs and the amendments appeared
to allow 30 foot boxes. Mr. Chave answered 25 feet is the basic height limit in the BD zones and there are
different ways to achieve 30 feet. For example in the BD1 zone, a 30-foot height can be achieved if the
building has a 15-foot ground floor. In other BD zones a 30-foot height can be achieved with a step back
and a 12-foot ground floor. The Planning Board recommendation eliminates the step back requirement
but retains the 12-foot ground floor requirement.
Packet Page 232 of 253
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 23, 2011
Page 15
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO CHANGE THE
60-FOOT AND 30-FOOT DEPTH TO A 45 FOOT COMMERCIAL DEPTH IN THE BD ZONES.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PETERSON, TO ADOPT THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO EXCLUDE
OFFICE USES FROM THE STORE FRONTS IN THE BD1 ZONE.
Councilmember Plunkett relayed he would be unable to support this amendment, envisioning a property
owner may not have a tenant without an office use. He preferred to allow the marketplace to determine
whether an office such as a tax accountant locates in the BD1 zone based on their success.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was also concerned that a space would remain vacant if a building
owner was unable to rent to a retail use. She did not support the motion.
Council President Peterson commented service businesses currently located in the BD1 zone would be
grandfathered. He pointed out this is not radical thinking; there are retail districts around the world and
they exist for a reason. As a retailer he understood that although some service businesses attract
customers, a consistent retail base is needed in the retail core. Shoppers in a retail area encountering
spaces where curtains are drawn because it is a dental office will often turn around and proceed no
further. He emphasized this is proposed for a very limited area of downtown, it is the right thing to do for
the greater good of the retail core and it is endorsed by business leaders in the community.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented a dental office cannot be visible to the street due to HIPPA
requirements. She envisioned uses such as interior designers, insurance, etc. who bring money to
Edmonds. She was not convinced that Edmonds should not allow those businesses as prominently as
retail stores. She favored a mixture of businesses in the City. She observed grandfathering meant that
existing businesses could remain and asked whether the grandfather clause would allow another office
after an office tenant moved out. Mr. Chave answered a similar use could locate in the space within 6
months. He relayed there have been instances where the building owners do not always seek a retail use
first and rent to whomever shows up which over time can erode the retail core. The Planning Board’s
recommendation was only for the BD1, a very small area and only in the first 45 feet of the ground floor.
In the BD1 zone offices can locate above or behind a retail uses.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3); COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PETERSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS PETSO, FRALEY-
MONILLAS AND PLUNKETT VOTING NO.
8. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE/BOARD MEETINGS
Councilmember Petso reported on the Public Facilities District Board meeting; these are generally good
and exciting times for the PFD. Although items are not usually presented to the Council without review
by a Council committee, Councilmember Petso explained the PFD is working on term limits for their
boards and they plan to present their proposal to Council on a Consent Agenda.
Councilmember Petso reported the Regional Fire Authority (RFA) Finance Committee is nearly to the
point where policy decisions can begin to be made on individual items, from staffing levels to hydrant
maintenance, within the RFA. As it will be difficult to get Council enough information in advance to seek
policy direction, she planned to tentatively agree to policies to get a preliminary model in place. She will
avoid agreeing on more than a tentative basis until there is an opportunity for Council discussion.
Councilmember Bernheim reported he was invited by the Muslim Association of Puget Sound to their
beautiful new mosque in Redmond to break the fast.
Packet Page 233 of 253
AM-4238 Item #: 13.
City Council Meeting
Date: 10/04/2011
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted By:Carrie Hite
Department:Parks and Recreation
Review
Committee:
Committee
Action:
Type:Action
Information
Subject Title
Compensation Consultant Update.
Recommendation from Mayor and Staff
Council give staff guidance to proceed.
Previous Council Action
December 7, 2010: Council voted to authorize $50,000 to hire a Compensation consultant to complete a
Non represented compensation policy review.
March, April, May: On agenda for Public Safety/Human Resources, but not presented due to time
constraints.
June 21, 2011: Council voted to direct staff to advertise an RFQ/RFP for a Compensation and
Classification study.
August 10-September 2nd: RFQ was published.
Narrative
Staff will be discussing the results of the RFP process, recommendations, and request for Council
direction.
Attached is the RFP that was published.
Also attached is a review of the RFP's that were submitted, with recommendations for further evaluation.
Attachments
Presentation: Compensation Consultant
Review of RFP's: Compensation Consultant
RFP: Compensation Consultant
Current Non Rep Compensation Policy
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:05 PM
Mayor Mike Cooper 09/29/2011 02:16 PM
Final Approval Sandy Chase 09/29/2011 02:38 PM
Packet Page 234 of 253
Form Started By: Carrie Hite Started On: 09/28/2011 05:58 PM
Final Approval Date: 09/29/2011
Packet Page 235 of 253
Employee Classification and
Compensation Study
City Council Presentation
October 4, 2011
Packet Page 236 of 253
Process To Date
December 7, 2010: Council voted to authorize
$50,000 to hire a Compensation consultant to
complete a Non represented compensation policy
review.
June 21, 2011: Council voted to direct staff to
advertise an RFQ/RFP for a Compensation and
Classification study.
August 10-September 2nd: RFQ was published.
Packet Page 237 of 253
Request for Proposal: 3 Phases
Phase 1:
Review and update of all City Job Descriptions
Last update 1997
Required as part of WCIA audit of HR in 2010
Extension granted until December 2011.
Need to complete this year.
Packet Page 238 of 253
Request for Proposal: 3 Phases
Phase 2:
Analyzing and updating current Non represented
employee’s compensation policy.
Includes review and analysis of current policy,
comparable jurisdictions, internal equity issues,
salary compression issues, and creating a
classification system that can be maintained on a
long term basis.
Packet Page 239 of 253
Request for Proposal: 3 Phases
Phase 3:
Conducting comprehensive salary comparison survey
for 40 non represented employees.
Includes market based survey for salaries, benefits,
staffing levels, and span of control.
Internal salary analysis to ensure equity.
Packet Page 240 of 253
Request for Proposals
We received 10 proposals, ranging in cost from
$19,000 to 95,000.
Council had the opportunity to review proposals in the
Council office.
After thorough staff review, we are recommending
further evaluation of 2-4 firms.
Please see table in Council packet for overview.
Packet Page 241 of 253
Discussion
Recommendation:
1.Committee interview up to four firms.
2.Reference checks on final firm (s).
3.Council discuss completion of phase 1,2, and/or 3.
4.Give staff guidance to proceed.
5.Award of contract on October 18th or 25th .
Packet Page 242 of 253
Compensation Consultant Review
October 2011
Firm Costs
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Total
Experience/Notes Recommend for Interview?
Koff and Associates $53,000 $8800 $5200 $73,500 California based, municipal
experience, good comparables,
very thorough proposal.
Yes
Public Sector Personnel
Consultants
$15,000 $2500 $12,500 $30,000 National company with a local
presence in Seattle. Lots of
municipal experience with good
comparables, experienced. Note:
Reflected additional costs, so need
to request more information.
Yes
Karras Consulting $15,000 $11,000 $13,500 $39,500 Exclusive public sector work, no
municipal experience, new
company with limited experience,
previous HR Director at State of
Wa.
Maybe
Milliman, Inc $16,000 $11,000 $20,000 $50,500 National firm, Seattle office,
Municipal experience, thorough
approach, good comparables,
proposal includes minimum scope
assumptions, would need to clarify
project cost for full scope.
Maybe
CPS Hr Consulting $40,000 $4080 $30,000 $74,080 Large firm, California based, some
municipal experience, good
qualifications, no Washington state
experience, expensive.
No
Nash and Company $12,000 $7500 $12,000 $31,500 California based, no local
experience, proposal difficult to
follow, some municipal experience,
no Washington state experience
No
Packet Page 243 of 253
Compensation Consultant Review
October 2011
Firm Costs
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Total
Experience/Notes Recommend for Interview?
Zigler/McPherson $40,000 $35,000 $20,000 $95,000 Out of price range, limited
municipal experience.
No
Jacobson, Betts and Co.
Phases don’t match scope $19,000
Local experience, proposal didn’t
match scope of work, not complete
No
The Waters Consulting
Group
$17,500 $15,000 $17,500 $50,000 Based in Texas. Has one comp from
this area, lots of municipal work,
lack of attention to detail in
proposals ( a lot of grammatical,
spelling errors)
No
Fox Lawson and Associates Phases don’t match scope $49,000 Didn’t follow format/scope, limited
experience
No
Packet Page 244 of 253
CITY OF EDMONDS
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS / PROPOSALS
Proposal Due Date:
September 2, 2011 no later than 4:30 p.m.
EMPLOYEE
CLASSIFICATION
AND
COMPENSATION STUDY
Packet Page 245 of 253
Page 2
8.10.11dlh 2:28p
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL
Employee Classification and Compensation Study
The City of Edmonds seeks qualifications and proposals from qualified firms
experienced in the design and analysis of position classifications and
compensation systems including job description update and design.
The model compensation system/strategy should address all compensation
factors insuring our ability to attract, retain and motivate our work force while
simultaneously meeting the financial resources, values and business goals of the
organization. Some compensation factors that must be considered include
internal equity balanced with external competitiveness, affordability, legal
defensibility, efficiency in administration, flexibility, and how well the policy meets
the organization’s unique needs. Our compensation policy must be an effective
tool for supporting the organization’s overall business strategy.
CITY OVERVIEW
The city has nine departments (City Clerk, Economic Development/Community
Services, Human Resources, Municipal Court, Finance, Development Services,
Parks and Recreation, Police, and Public Works). Of the 207 City employees,
approximately 40 are not represented by union. This non-represented group
includes directors, supervisors, and technical employees. The City’s remaining
work force consists of union members in SEIU, Teamsters, the Edmonds Police
Officers Association (EPOA) and clerical support for the EPOA (also represented
by the Police Officer’s bargaining unit).
The current compensation system, with minor variations, has been in use since
2000. The City of Edmonds currently offers a complete benefit package
including medical, dental and vision benefits with employer/employee share on
the premium cost, Washington State retirement, Municipal Employees Benefit
Trust (in lieu of Social Security), life insurance, 11 paid holidays, and variable
sick leave and vacation accruals based on longevity and bargaining unit.
OBJECTIVE
The City desires to enter into a contract with a highly qualified and experienced
consulting firm for the following purposes:
Review/update all City job descriptions
Make recommendations/facilitate in the development and implementation
of a salary administration program that will enable the City to competitively
recruit employees, retain the current workforce, motivate employee job
performance, and meet the fiscal and budgetary responsibilities of the City
Conduct professional and thorough salary surveys with comparable
jurisdictions
Compile survey data into a usable, viable format and analyze survey data
for each position
Packet Page 246 of 253
Page 3
8.10.11dlh 2:28p
CONSULTANT OUTCOMES AND WORK PRODUCT
The consulting firm selected to conduct the classification and compensation work
will be expected to deliver the following services:
PHASE I (ALL CITY)
Phase I consists of a thorough review and update of all City job
descriptions. These documents have not been reviewed in a
comprehensive manner since 1997. It is critical that all job descriptions
accurately reflect job tasks since they serve as the basis for any salary
comparison. This phase should include:
o An update of position descriptions to accurately reflect actual duties
and responsibilities performed, including identification of essential
job functions.
o A review and determination of exempt or non-exempt classification
status per the federal Fair Labor Standards Act as updated August
2004 and the Washington State Minimum Wage Act.
PHASE II (FOR THE 40 NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ONLY)
Phase II requires analyzing and updating our current non-represented
employee’s compensation policy. This phase should include:
o A comprehensive review of our current compensation policy
(attached); assisting staff/Council in updating the document to
better meet the needs and goals of the City including budgetary
limits and recruitment/retention.
o A comprehensive review and analysis of the jurisdictions that
Edmonds utilizes for comparable data and provide experienced and
effective external market based guidance.
o A comprehensive review and analysis of internal equity policies and
issues.
o Creating a pay structure that allows for recognizing, motivating, and
rewarding increased competencies, skills, and/or performance.
o A comprehensive review of current salary compression issues that
includes best business practices for correction.
o A classification system that can be maintained on a long-term basis
with limited staff.
PHASE III (FOR THE 40 NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES ONLY)
Phase III needs to provide a detailed process for conducting thorough,
professional, and comprehensive salary comparison surveys of our 40
non-represented positions using approved comparables. This phase
should include:
o Surveys that address relevant areas including market based
salaries, benefits, staffing levels, and span of control.
o An internal salary analysis to ensure, as much as possible, internal
equity among the non-represented positions.
Packet Page 247 of 253
Page 4
8.10.11dlh 2:28p
o A detailed analysis of the data and communication of the
information to employee groups, managers, and/or elected officials.
CRITICAL NOTE:
Each phase should require separate and independent bids for the
work involved to allow the City the greatest flexibility in work
approach and cost containment.
QUALIFICATIONS:
Please respond to each section fully and completely in order to assure that your
firm receives full credit when your proposal is reviewed by the City of Edmonds.
Please provide five (5) copies of the following:
1. Legal name of proposer/consultant firm
2. Mailing and street address
3. Telephone number and e-mail address
4. Name of contact person/representative and their specific contact
information (e-mail preferred)
5. Title of contact person/representative
6. Size of firm/business (number of FTEs), corporate qualifications, and
history
7. Please provide resumes for the principal professionals who may be
assigned to the project
8. Please provide responses to the following questions (limited to four
concise pages):
a. Please detail your experience in conducting similar work in
Washington State. Please include in your response the following:
i. Your experience creating position job descriptions, including
evaluating and delineating essential functions
ii. Your experience evaluating positions to determine
classification status as exempt or non-exempt per the federal
Fair Labor Standards Act and the Washington State
Minimum Wage Act
iii. Please briefly detail any knowledge your firm may have
regarding the collective bargaining process as it relates to
updating/changing union negotiated job descriptions
b. Please detail your experience in developing classification and
compensation plans for public employers
c. Please detail your experience with internal equity salary structures
d. Please give examples of public sector projects or studies that you,
or your firm, conducted in the local area
e. Please provide your methodology, timing, and all service costs for
each phase of this project (I, II, and III).
f. Please place your name and/or the name of the firm on the top
of each page of your proposal.
Packet Page 248 of 253
Page 5
8.10.11dlh 2:28p
SELECTION PROCEDURE:
All qualifications/proposals will be reviewed and screened based upon the
qualifications and requirements outlined in this request. Those individuals
deemed most qualified may be screened further based upon reference checks.
Finalists will be invited for interviews.
TO REPLY TO THIS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL:
Please submit five (5) copies of the qualifications/proposal packet by Friday,
September 2, 2011. Please note that City Hall closes at 4:30 p.m. so all
proposal packets must be received prior to that time. Each proposal must
clearly identify the individual to be contacted regarding the submitted proposal,
along with all contact information (including e-mail).
NOTICES
1. This Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal has been compiled
in good faith. The information contained within is selective and subject to
the City’s updating, expansion, revision and amendment.
2. The City reserves the right to change any aspect of, terminate, or delay
this RFP/RFQ process at any time, and notice shall be given in a timely
manner. Recipients of this RFQ/RFP are advised that nothing stated
herein, or any part thereof, or any communication during the evaluation
and selection process, shall be construed as constituting, offering or
awarding a contract, representation or agreement of any kind between the
City and any other party save for a formal written contract, properly
executed by both parties.
3. Responses to this RFQ/RFP will become the property of the City, and will
form the basis of negotiations of an agreement between the City and the
apparent successful vendor.
4. The City is not liable and will not be responsible for any costs incurred by
any vendor(s) for the preparation and delivery of the RFQ/RFP responses
nor will the City be liable for any costs incurred prior to the execution of an
agreement including but not limited to presentations by finalists to the City.
5. The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to waive minor
administrative irregularities contained in any proposal.
6. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time
without penalty.
7. The City reserves the right to refrain from contracting with any vendor.
8. The City reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of
the proposal submitted. The proposal, therefore, should be submitted
initially with the most favorable terms the vendor can offer.
9. Vendors will not be allowed to alter proposal documents after submittal.
10. Proposals must be received by the time/date specified. It shall be the sole
responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that the proposal is submitted by
the time and date specified. Any proposal received after the appointed
time shall not be accepted under any circumstances. Any uncertainty
Packet Page 249 of 253
Page 6
8.10.11dlh 2:28p
regarding the time a proposal is received shall be resolved against the
Proposer.
ATTACHMENTS TO THE RFQ/RFP
A copy of the City’s current non-represented employee compensation
policy
STAFF CONTACT
Direct all questions and inquiries related to this Request for Qualifications/
Request for Proposal and all proposal materials to:
Via Mail: Debi Humann, SPHR
HR Director
City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Via e-mail: humann@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Direct Office Phone: 425.672.5751
The City of Edmonds reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, waive
technicalities or irregularities, and to accept any proposal if such action is
believed to be in the best interest of the City.
The City of Edmonds is an Equal Opportunity Employer
Packet Page 250 of 253
9/29/2011dlh
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
SUBJECT: NON-REPRESENTED COMPENSATION POLICY
The City’s non-represented compensation policy strives to maintain equity in pay
for all employees, offers competitive salaries to attract high level applicants,
offers internal equity to foster long term retention of valuable employees, and
rewards meritorious job performance for deserving individuals.
BANDING (Internal Equity Component) -
The City’s non-represented compensation policy covers all non-represented
positions in eight different bands as follows:
Band A:
Police Chief, Finance Director, Public Works Director, Community Services
Director/Economic Development Director, Parks, Recreation, and Cultural
Services Director, Development Services Director, and Human Resources
Director
Band B:
Assistant Police Chief and City Engineer
Band C:
Planning Manager, Building Official, City Clerk and WWTP Manager
Band D:
Chief Information Officer, Transportation Engineer, Court Administrator,
Water/Sewer Manager, Street/Storm Water Manager and WWTP Supervisor
Band E:
Facilities Manager, Parks Manager, Storm Water Engineer, Cultural Services
Manager, Recreation Services Manager, Fleet Manager, Assistant Building
Official, Engineering Program Manager 2 and 3, Senior Planner and Senior
Utilities Engineer
City of Edmonds
PERSONNEL POLICIES
Packet Page 251 of 253
Page 2
Band F:
Executive Assistant to the Mayor, Planner, Capital Project Manager, Engineering
Program Manager 1 and Associate Planner
Band G:
Assistant Planner, Recycling Coordinator, Executive Assistant Confidential and
Human Resources Analyst
Band H:
Human Resources Assistant
The salary for each position shall remain within the boundaries of the specific
corresponding band. The bands are consistently held at a 50% width.
METHOD/APPLICATION (External Component) –
Annually, to be completed no later than September 1 of each year, the non-
represented bands will be realigned based on a market survey of two positions;
the highest paid non-represented position and the lowest paid non-represented
position. This process will involve the following:
1. Determining the highest paid non-represented position (Band A) and the
lowest paid non-represented position (Band H).
2. Complete a market based survey of the two positions using the
comparable cities from King, Snohomish, and Pierce Counties as
determined by the HR Committee in 2000 (Attachment 1). The survey will
include successfully comparing our positions with four cities directly above
Edmonds by population and with four cities directly below Edmonds by
population. The level 5 position (or median) will be determined with the
median salary becoming the new maximum for the band.
3. The remaining bands (B through G) will be consistently spaced between
Bands A and H.
ANNUAL INCREASES –
Non-represented staff are eligible for two increases a year as follows:
Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA):
As part of the annual budget process, each band is eligible for a COLA on an
annual basis when approved by City Council. COLA shall be awarded following
the annual market based survey and any necessary adjustments of non-
represented bands.
Packet Page 252 of 253
Page 3
Annual Merit Increase:
Merit increases may be awarded to non-represented employees based on
performance as follows:
1% - Meets Standards –
Performance consistently meets job requirements and goals are achieved
as stated in the annual evaluation or work plan.
2% - Commendable –
Performance is consistently above adequate skill levels. Goals are
achieved often beyond expectation.
3% - Distinguished –
Performance is consistently and significantly beyond established
standards. Goals are achieved at an outstanding level and exceptional
skill levels are consistently demonstrated.
For exceptional meritorious performance, over and above distinguished, the
Mayor has the authority to award a merit increase up to a maximum of 5% with
appropriate justification from the Department Director. At no point shall
employees be allowed to exceed the band maximum.
RECRUITMENT -
For external recruitment purposes, the band range will consist of the established
band minimum up to 50% of the band width as the maximum (the mid-point of
the band). New employees shall be hired at no more than 5% above their
current salary not to exceed 50% of their specific band. In rare situations in
which the position can not be filled, or when internal salary compression is a
component, the Mayor has the authority to negotiate a starting salary that may
exceed the mid-point within the band width.
APPEALS –
If a non-represented employee believes they have been incorrectly placed within
the band structure, or has another pay equity issue, they may bring the issue
forward to their direct supervisor and/or Department Director. If the Director finds
the issue has validity, he/she will appeal to the Mayor to determine whether the
position has been placed inappropriately, from a financial and from a
responsibilities/job tasks standpoint, within a designated band. If, upon the
conclusion of the review it is determined that an adjustment is warranted, the
Mayor has the authority to correct position placement within the bands as
appropriate. No other appeal process is available.
Packet Page 253 of 253