Loading...
10119 EDMONDS WAY.PDF10119 EDMONDS WAY CITY OF EDMONDS - SIDE SEWER PERMIT r 1 WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT PERMIT /Call 175-2525 for side sewer inspections BEFORE covering any portion of the construction.) \Inspection will be provided within 24 hours after requst. NO Sat., Sun., or holiday inspections./ ADDRESS LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION..........-: : r`«�.. ......... �V............................ Af PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION........... '/� �..�:'?.................................................................. .................................................. -.......... ...................................................................................... ................-............:.:...:........----•---...........----................................... .................................................OWNER AND/OR BUILDER ............ F��'C?.. An^ ........ ��.i� �- ,........_�' ...-� �........--.......... .... R ,r-T: .�� CO ACTOR'S NAME &ADDRESS..-........_� ! N ? �^ ` --� v.............. ._r._...., , ..-...... - .......1................. _........................................................... Permission is granted .... _-G.... Lr?c..........% ..... 19.-"�, for repair and/or connection of aside sewer to the city sanitary sewer system in accordance with CityofdEdmonds ordinances. NTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. NOTE No. 2—All work performed in city right-of-way requires an Invasion of Right -of -Way Permit obtainable from the City Engineer's office. NOTE No. 3—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. NOTE No. 4—Top. of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2q . No bends in grade sharper than 'A will be permitted. NOTE No. 5—Trenches In street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. 6—It is_unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appurtenances except to in- sert the pipe into the wye. DISAPPROVED ❑ Date ... _..................... ........ By.....-.. Date............. ............-.. By....- Date ................ By....- l.! d ' , APPROVED... ❑ Date .... .::. .::........:....... :.. ....r".. .......... By.......:.. `......................._..............................._... 1V011li4l-ks• r/ — BOTH Permit Copies MUST Be Signed By Owner of Firm Performing Construction PRIOR To Request For Inspection . `........ ........ ............ .... ... I hereby certify that the side sewer installation constructed under this permit ,(owner'of, CoIntiabting Firm Perforrn`ing Construction) Onstall'ed.in.accordance with all governing ordinances of the City of Edmonds"., f�. Dated this..,.....................day of.--r' // 1. ........-.......... 19 J J Check BEFORE you dig for: Water ❑, Gas ❑, Telephone ❑, Power ❑, Sewer ❑, Other ❑ J J 0 ADDRESS: I o ( l q C] TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 610 (9 �x 3 00 / 0007 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): 19A-001(065(kfioo) I - Cqgq blLp gel I ) COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: CRITICAL AREAS :1,'1 6 V-1 U1, 13- I) DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver [:]Study Required [Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER):1E6—w) V I I s� M 3 - G 41 S (EWO� , M 3 - 0/ 7 Maxi PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: oqI 2,61 d l SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: 10166- LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: lO SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAPCARDDATED: OTHER:D G>�' / �SIffA , Q%U -�3g 3°7If I (F/s) J 'm -6$s� (S�pq) LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc Water Service Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ...................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO................... OWNER............................................................ ............................ CONTRACTOR................................................................................... PERmi-r NO..9..'Ia...06Z % ,. JOB ADDRESS ..I08 .... 6PH.;0N..D.S.... i^� ................. 000 l000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LO-r NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... NAMEOF ADDITION..:.................................................................................................................... NOTIM, NO WARRAIM OF ACCURAM. The "Ion drown on -the I aitadod wrap was oompW fa m by go C4 d Edn6nc* Ik employsoa i and oorsWtants. The City of Edwards does rot w to amuraq of _ —J anyllung set forth on fhe map. My person or anti n'ques6ng a U*— shouid conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map, including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not epst and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds not its employees or o#fioers shall be liable for the information given on this map, not for any oral represantation praAded based upon said crap. PWV-0001.11175 (REU 1/78) �a 3 � � A CA 7— � b o fl � 7- N 0 � Approved: _ p DZTI' ...�--� '. `I.Y................ By ...............—Y .�..................- �Xh , v<.'. �'X.�'L, f -I1R.� .. '�a�".;��T i 4� 's�.i9. g+'#,YS{'.. .'_;u7 ;-._,.. ,��r�.� �".�'�.t'�16. `���'lyt�bM"7—` . �`�. ?'' - .. , an City of Edmond - RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT G Permit Number. I Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1 is 115 C 1�o M o A3 b S W Y l _ - p B. Type of Work (be specific): I hi.S "rA L L !SEC. P E D S A S E n�._lag of f'OL.E c C. Contractor: ISM O. co, P V D Contact: 1309 K AK A L r Y Mailing Address: 2 1018 11 wy I Phone: (4 ZS� b 70 " 3 Z 14 State License #: C i->mpmb S , 0A a 8024- Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. K Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F_ Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes Flo G. Size of Cut x H. Charje $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and 'attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. 1► Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is -required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. - Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with .City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the, end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. lop el Signature: Date.: Q 8 ' 98 (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: KW TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: i A RIGHT OF WAY FEE: :3 01 on DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 11l: RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: Q ' oV RECEIPT NO.: ) ISSUED BY. !t. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: v G CITY OF EDMONDS 121 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) ti �D�EtiTE+R�1VIeIiNA�TI�ON ®F,NON,;�S;IGNI11FRONN,GE Description of proposal: Construction of a 12 x 20 freestanding espresso stand and related site improvements. Drive-thru businesses are subject to Conditional Use Permit requirements in a Neighborhood Business (BN) zone Proponent: Karissa Bresheare Location of proposal, including street address if any: 10115 Edmonds Way Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other informhtion on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by: Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: / 7 14 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than a►TU u,0 31 , 1998, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrev S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on f 1998, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the dmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: Page ! of 2 GOURMET-DNS.DOC 8/ 17/98. SEPA CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT J990-19oo PERMIT 3k10 90C,`8 Address of Construction: 01IS �� Q1140/2 J S (N 4 Property Legal Description (Include all easements): _Za' AC<r- 4P106-00.3-0O-,,'--49ZO;z Owner and/or Contractor: "� State License No. �!il��e� Building Permit No. 9,3gEs- ❑ Single Family ❑ Multi Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Commercial ❑ Public Invasion into City Right -of -Way: gfNo ❑ Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property: E ✓No ❑ Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify that I .have rod and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. CA Azze - Da e * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE` USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. oa3. Permit Fee: 4& 60 Issued By Trunk Charge: 36) Date Issued: Z S-9 9 Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Date —Initial - Comments Reason Rejected: Date —Initial - Final Inspection Approved: DateCa_.Z, i itial �-/ 99 ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3190 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO.................................7 NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ❑ LID NO ................... ASMT. NO........... ' OWNER................................................................................................ CONTRACTOR..................................-----...........---------......------.....------.. PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS .... ..... .....'9Y.................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ...................................... BLOCK NO..----------------------------------- ��!A L,oNONDS WRY�7 ��6UN}( LltVE u co, i pr ` r. c% NAMEOF ADDITION...................................................................................... K yyi" Si rr l0/l5- Ea.MONds �4r Approved: PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE .......3 ::1.-. ----------------- BY------...i r /..4..cs!. ................... 0 PLANNING DATA N E-w Gam MCC -cr 1A, L, NAME: SITE ADDRESS: I4DATE: V_11 � I ZONING: VU PLAN CHK#: I I 'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION USE(S) PROPOSED: l �V�M ALLOWED?:- Z�v �� w LEGAL NONCONFO MIN LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED /N) CUP File:��J ADB FILE #: IN --60 OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: PARKING: Use: f No. Spaces Required: X / (floor area, # employees, etc. _ Use: m No. Spaces Required: X 2` (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Total Required: Actual Provided: SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: , Front: 20' Left Side: Right Side: N� Rear: S Actual Setbacks: i Front: Left Side:_Right Side: (1<1 Rear: 00 Street map checked for additional setback required — ( s/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: " e .� ��. Maximum Allowed. � Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: _ . Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: - Modulation Allowed?: MA Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: LANDSCAPING: Matche�aRBroved:�) Bond: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS M -"2�L/ 4Afi1w%parmWPLAN0AaD0C Caver SEPA DETERMINATIO SHORELINE REQUIRED?: N IA LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: �1/� cA(llew\partnPt" PLANDAa.DOC 109 CITY OF EDMONDS 16 ST13EET • F ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT '� APPLICATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (Aoolicznt to Cc.-^olete A d ° and Submit in DuoZicate) A. Permit to be issued to: For work at: (address or vicinity) ' Type of work to be done: ��i 6/ /%�[ti ��/'/G'�.C1.t1L/ C0�7//Pc--T' (Attach Drawing ?-;hen Applicable) c Y� 1l» J Ta%n _ /Pc�e� Toc�rc�7riAL Time Required -- Start: Owner: lU—�G� Name Mailing A ress City State Contractor: T Name Mailing Address ity State Finish:. Telephone Number 223-01-A.l-� Z�Bo State License Number Telephone Number B. INDEHNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Department. 'Work subject to inspection and restoration in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by the Engineering Department. Call 775-2525. Signature: ,6-1—%% Onws r Agent Date Signed �^ C. DO NOT WRITE BELOW TTHIS LINE +,�(Tobe completed by Issuing Agency) Permit Issued (Dater` ) QF 1 ff, " 1117�1./Permit Number' Fee: 15 inn "" Bond: Time Authorized: ER' S APJPtCNTAL DA "U � � • OSTREET FILE DATE: A N L 61 lc:::� i r N1E '10 70: Harry !,!hi tcutt Building Official FRO": Richard H. Allen Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: c� (I ��� ..c ��. __�— �) ��� After revi e-,; of the subject building permit application, %•re have the fol l ot•ri ng corrnients (1) Coordination Of the lncation of any structure witli respect to utilities streets, property lines and driveway grades is the responsibility of the contractor. (2) The Contractor is required to keep the abutting streets cleaned of dirt and debris caused by the construction. (3) A "Right -of -Way Construction" permit is required, from the Engineering Div. of Public Works, for any work within the Public riglit-of.-way or public easement. (4) Driveway slope not to exceed 140. C c.�N N 1-C 110M � �j"b �r'��N1 fi�tZ� � 5t0E SEwex- p� iT �t2.or� �. t�J • 'Dt�-t• ��, c1 � �ro �� 7,eA � c� �&�► 4c.E 'D I S to as,�.. ST"4?i o �l GWrM qWTI* IVT"EL LPES (N-('K LIST 1.0j.1 6 B111111)"NIG PrINIT PT!"T.".1 II Strcet Ri.pht-oE-1'-,av Existing L)OUC>- III Acccss Fascinvits Existin MOD F Utility Fascinont Existing PIMI) Lot Per 5*,iIbd i viFion ------ �;,w Plat Asscssor 7 lan x Site Plan Oicd:ed for Accurao,—�`Gj1 --- - — n, rol U ul - �O-Wigom a- r OL (j ��f Le(7 (f (:k A' w I{r(71 . Ck 11ate !� F:xistint,, Pater '•,.'dn 'Q) L F", \ e___ � CTU� t S, i I t 11%,('rint 1'cri- ;; r,:�d per hre Coc . . 1 .1 --J� .) j. r Flotector (,Jl(,Clj, Cc;)+,ic Tan1, ,opiovcd , scr-tic TmIr. Pernlit !'cnliirc(,L le-mi t "o. --7— T) "0. File '10. -,idc Scv.-Cr Wailabil-it" u u 0. I ary L v Sever Connection Fcc IONT10"., by Ce=j-� Date (?!)Cjj 114td, YA i s t 4 n NJ A - Culvert Requirod / of\) - S3.,-e Catc,11 'I"'15zill RC-(1u-;1-cd ;J)t\JI9 --Ind-I.Cate oil '7itc Plan c i n I Collez-* 16 n (its OPCO ('(-tn -3 ff" N.- liole requirccl bidicate. oil Sitc, Pjru)— Soil Conditions F-I Grot-uld 1%'ater Field (1,0ched— - z --- ft I vievi by Date � k sT Street Paving; Recluirccl (lirh and C;ittcr Rcouircd Sidcv,,alk 1'equi.red. ____ k—sKT Ioo i �= Curb (lit for Privev.av Required Rid lit -of.- Construction Pcnni.t Rcquircd t-Fond Required for Puhlic Improvement.,; i Street \��ric Sian Rcquired � Othcr Simi.nci Rccuircd 111rc Pcnnit Site Inspection made on r ! BY: Sewer Water ' r Strcct 17nginccri.nrT S1�eci.ril Rec;iri.rcrZcnpt�s Listed in me>:ro to Puil.cli.nR ll^p�rtrnert By — lrJ�_ Da t c� ----- --- -- AIA. items fi.l].ec1 in on Building 11crnr_it. Application By _ _ _ — Date--- --- -- il� <);: in,s ;>tw1 �cd ;end ;dotati.on ; "'_.('c — V Pate --- Approved 1)), Public 1'.orl:s Dcpart;,,ent The City of Edmonds OW JOB APPLICATION for SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO- -------------- ----------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION � REPAIRS ❑ LID NO. ---------------- - T. NO. 4 MT NO ' NER Iq I- , :.. ill --------------•--- CONTRACTOR .. A -.� ` ` ' ' .-•---- R . ..........---•----- 111 AD ESS---1,%�� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO- -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO. --------------------------------•--- NAME OF ADDITION -------------- ---------------------------------------------- v$or APPLICATION City of Edmonds for EASEMENT NO. SIDE SEWER PERMIT L/ NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ❑ LID NO ................... .ASMT. NO................... L.Il�lrC EX'-T�.r`K� 1] PL�I O RY C2, S OWNER — Ts ----- ----------- •------•------- CONTRACTOR _ S ......• . ----------------------- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS __�- .-__ �0��......!�Y LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO_ ______________________________________ BLOCK NO. ------------------------------------ NAME OF ADDITION • 0 • ramp Approved: DATE..7........... BY � ........... 'S DATE RECEIVED[­A111111111W L 2_ �� _ 00 PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE NUMBIER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION nooREss ` SUITE/PTO OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS y PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. MAILING ADDRESS W + lT'4''T C �Q •••+� r I y� .+�.��� LID FEE S . _ . .... PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP App—d Rw perm, Pegp..e street P..l, Rep'C CITY TP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED — Inepectan ReeeYeO S41.welk RaeuY.e A(O161 4 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT - UA4�gfO1 , NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO.OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED Cl (� l �� , J YES NO Q W ADDRESS FE REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE Z = , c� W i ��C } CITY ZIP TELEPHONE �c ZDC_ Zc> 41( /I-IIILg%1 AS• rZl l42' I , NAME _ • •ENGINEErR114G }v REVIE D/DAT l ,R'j `I ADDRESS .^�r�Dcl �.v rC ;; ':'s.. o. i �U "�{P-•�/ DATE + = Y • ZIP'• TELEPHONE s_ FIRE REVIEWED BY rZ, Q Q U J FOND (7 STATA LIICE�NSEE NUUMBBER% EX��.PIRATIO,DA//yE CHEfC VARIANCE OR CU /•ii�O�� 2 VVL� SHORELINE OR ADB# 'y r' /` IJ 17�0� i4 INSPECTION RE010 ES Q NO POSTED ', ! m , '�L.i' 1 1 ✓ LJ L��C l l HEIGHT J •a PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. SERA REVIEW M MPL 'ZE j EXEMPT I SIGN AREA SLOWED PROPOSED.- ��:ALLOWED ,.. (q N n .r / T" PROPOSED I �1 - W J EXP y2 1 v m Q,: RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE' ALLO ED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT ;UR SIDE REAR O m a 0. COMPLIANCE OR �; �.`—�'� ?� _. ? i 0 c: ❑ AUDITION o COMMERCIAL '` ❑ CHANGE OF USE g - PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BV DA M. ❑ REMODEL ❑ -APARTMENT . ❑ SIGN REQ'D PRt ED m ' 7 1 () , FENCE ❑ REPAIR �qll xG •,-�CYOS ❑ ( X FT) l❑ MARK$ IO CGNO _ C Z, ' ❑ DEMOLISH TANK ❑ OTHER ,. n p G>r SCG G%IG► 34 �/ ; r ❑GARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL - CARPORT S =:S — Hor LI'H' �70h N om O ,D I T DD i i (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: Q ��?v 24L.Lr CHECKED By TYPE O CON TRUCTION .I C E OCCUPANT / GROUP I —4 9 m ( ., m_ I{` a NUMBER C OF NUMBEROF DWELLING C> CRITICAL y AREAS /�•J;J//� (i/1 � 0 SPECIAL INSP CTOR AREA QGCUPANT REQUIRED LOAD / I f 0 iI) O p STORIES UNITS - NUMBER /� YES II1 r n m DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE C� _• •; . ,. _ , .,' ..; . REMARKS," z i i 9 N PROGRESS.INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D J d elf rlAh;� Z V, VALUATION N ' FEE ��•��'yF'E,E,� ,{ �I• PLAN CHECK ,t _ O 9 HEAT SOURCE GLAZING% i • t0 PE % BUILDING " -" � I t (i m PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE 'PLUMBING { MECHANICAL , THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO .. r- BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL j DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.I WILL REO UIRE j J SEPARATE PERMISSION. L.'y STATE SURCHARGE, PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS C 1—n` n PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS NG+ EVIEW FEES �jOJD SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION i ENG. INSPECTION FEE - t y H -APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS !+{ IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF f LANDSCAPING / c EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES. AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTIDNFEF ! �.% ��J v •� a ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLYOR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPT // /- �l�� # _ of DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- v 1iGGCt RECEI �O t = TOTAL AMOUNT DUE "- '''' I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL { GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit unl:l signed Cy the ' THE OWNER. I AGREE TION; AND I DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING 70 FOR INSPECTION BuilAinq 011icial or his/her D#Duty; #ntl Foes era DaiC. entl rompl is acknowloegoe in space provmoe. IN VIOLAT N OF THE LABOR WORKM S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFI"ICIAL NAT /, U + SIG T E (OWNER GENT DAT�Ej SIGNEDy(425) OT I,GU-1 (/��'" `� 7 (1-0220 RELEASE V DATE ' ATTENTION EXT1333 � � IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771 -0221 A FINIAI INS PFrTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- _ ^ 0 IGINAL_ FILE_ YELLOW _INSPECTOR Critical Areas Checklist' Site Information Project Name: -T�—Xkc� �NL • Permit Number. p,-E Z /�" Site Location: -t �= Ft�N �`� Property Tax Account Number. -y 0-3- Approximate Site Size (acres or square f ): Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? t,-)b General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? yb-el Date of most recent action: 118+ Soils / Topography 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? L-- (Iffa � �.D 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. 5'C Flat less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet) Silly. slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.)v Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments Hydrology/Vegetation. 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. t� 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: —Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or anarea where waters lows across the grounds surface? flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ; shrubs ;mixed 9. ' Obvious wetland is present on site: WAIVER: Critical areasatudy is -not required Determination .Number . 7l> Review i Planner `'�Oate Rev 3R7l92 e99-t99 o City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The la itical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person Pig a Development permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal ofa. development permit to the (Sty_ The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the 'bject Prolretty. The information necdod to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City HAI (Critical Areas . inventori4* maps, or soil surveys). RECEIVeD APR 13 iq�� PERMIT COUNTER An applicant; or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City_ The City will review the cheddis% make a precursory site visit, and make a detarmnation of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development Permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map 'of the parcxi with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the snbjat parecl(s). ]in addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site - I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided -are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below) - Owner/ Applicant: Applicant Representative: Name Name Title Street Address City. State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Z=�T t r-t f47p� Title Street Address 78"f, City, State, ZIP Phone Si �-- Date DEC-05-2000 17:09 CITY OF EDMONDS 4kitical 4257710221 P.03iO3 Areas Checkli C*-m=)I-L' ----------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) l . Site Address/Location:1� �Z�t`�bi. �hS• '�' 2. Property Tax Account Number;L;>v-1—Olio II 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? �6_ yes; ` ` no. If yes; how is site developed? ��—�z�� L���ST"<<yG— l�c�✓�{� F 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. _ _ ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: (�—� C� ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? _ S. Site is in the floodway "C> floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round?Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested �� ; meadow 0 ; shrubs 6A Q� ,; mixed z. urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ` t7 For City Staff Use Only- -------------------------------------------- I. Site is Zoned? �Aei ghb-6'I hood /?u i`7ess 2. SCS mapped soil type($)? .ev lG']SAnd la4r,17, L12_ 0 t MI—b " l� 3. Wetland inventory or C.A..map.indicates wetland present on site? A fo 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? N0 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? 10 6. Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? A10 DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED _ WAIVER Reviewed by: 7RV62-� (ginner CONDITIONAL WAIVER ate ^ce cnk.doc, Rev 1010/97 TOTPL P.03 1A I Y Uh- EDMUNDS 4257710221 P.U2i��l City of E�onds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 Critical Areas File #:�_ Critical Areas Checkli ee: $45.00 Date Received by Dev` tWeCity Receipt No: __ Date Mailed to Applicant: n CRITICAL., AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form i-s to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant.- Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature "ate d:reception/iana/CACLHandaut . doe Applicant Representative: Name Street Address -14- Z�C� City State zip '11C. 1`S')- City of Edmonds PERMIT NO: 9554 PERMIT EXPIRES SIDE SEWER PERMIT � � Address of Construction: Property Tax Account Parcel No: C6 - 7 — 4) G Attach copies of all access and utility easements �� Verified and Approved by r;wn�e and/or Contractor: ACo i L ctorLicense #:Rif MSEGC, O 1 a 00 Building Permit #. oZDO 1 Oq lgyvC , qIO'%� ❑ Single Family Invasion into City *Right -of Way: ❑ Yes [NNo ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units Commercial (No. off Z--?,L) t ►[Ac re S ❑ Public V *RW Construction Permit # Cross other **Private Property: ❑ Yes CR No **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. Owner t6r contractor signature and acknowledgement statement: By,signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled �ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. Date W CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-42�5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION. W W FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extensions j b� 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. '... Permit Fee $ Repair Fee $ Issued By: i1 Trunk Charge $ r Date Issued: lol Fdor Assessment Fee $ "�"Receipt No: lcL� 14 0 City Permit Surcharge Fee $5.001 Total Fees Paid $ 93D- NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED. Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: 1015 Initial: 1�C� Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: I Initial: <5; As -built to Street File: t� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE t, White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bldg;forms;ssperm itj lg4/00 I N N o C/O C/O 23' 4' SEWER PIPE y 4' X 6' REDUCER C/O 6' FRONT \� 1' 7,5 3 `nP ZO �P N CITY DE EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS PERMIT 10119 EDMONDS WAY NUMBER 9554 HOMEOWNER TACO BELL CONTRACTOR XXXX DATE 10/08/02 DRAWN BI.ABILA W • • 0 c�a � era o o U, by 4 re�ir UN CO % 4r�euea' pi i l i i t sof ev o Fj • t 2 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS 4 PER UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SECTION 109 At: 10119 Edmonds Way, Edmonds WA 98020 Building Permit #: #2001-0455 _ Occupancy established by this certificate: Dwelling Units: **NIA** No. Storias: 1 B Type Construction: V-N Basement: No Maximum Occupant Load **36** (Per U.B.C. 1002) i Room capacity signs, when required, must remain posted at all times. Owner of Building: Olympic Foods Address: 9709 3rd Ave NE #303, Seattle WA 980115 THE Taco Bell HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1997 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY FOR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED. Issued this 25th day of February, 2002 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL BY: This ceruncate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and shall be t�iinNe condition et all times. Any mange of occupancy a use requires a wilding pemtit and a new certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. • .tt .,t. tn•• •s,•, .ut• St. t•'i•. •�' •At. tt2. t�i. t. .tom L. 'r t. '�•. t�i. t.�• Sit S�,hpt,-. �,�hyi�. r�t���i��. �IMN,'� �',�,•. Ljl�•� A:, jt�.t�� ����} �-��I�t�. 4 tV(bwVY�J�r�Ht/Y yy 1 �lY✓ yy �/ �� � � (b (b 0 a U �� STREET FILeD MEMORANDUM Date: December 20, 2001 To: Taco Bell File From: Jeannine L. Graf, Building Official JV Subject Taco Bell Height Calculations @ 10119 Edmonds Way Building Permit 2001-0455 Since the Planner of Record has determined that height calculations are not required for this project (reference November 5, 2001 memo attached) the Building Inspector is unable to perform a height check for compliance to the City zoning code. Cc: Taco Bell Permit Project File 6/ Street Address File City of Edmonds (Q Development Services Department •0 •• MEMORANDUNI / z Date: To: November 5, 2001 Taco Bell Street File 10119 Edmonds Way From: Kathleen Taylor, Planning Division Subject: Height Calculations Height calculations were not required for building permit application # 2001-0455 for the following reasons: • The lot is completely flat. This is not only obvious by visiting the site, but is best illustrated by the proposed grading plan in file ADB-2000-61. It denotes the existing elevation at various points on the property. The spot elevations around the building fluctuate approximately 1 foot. • The maximum height within the Planned Business zone is 25 feet from the average original grade. The building is 23 feet in height as indicated by the elevation drawings. Since this is 2 feet below the maximum height and the lot is flat, height calculations were not required. �pE� FILE City of Edmonds m Planning Division -X��ca,l rota T�.1� eAO-7-� -tp Vj'1a+CA ADr-_2�- - 2oco-& I APPROVED BY PLANNING F I M (( 2 @�� I r ===> � 1p=�'n �I 10)Q) HQ) 1p=[M4g'nrF a - 0 o SCALE: 1.5fe = V-0" 1/2" If this does not measure corteedy the drawing 0 has been reduced or etdarged from original sine. Do not scale oft of draw.. without correcfin. size. SINGLE -FACE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ALUMINUM EXTRUSION CABINET -.177" WHITE ACRYLIC FACE -VINYL GRAPHICS per CORPORATE SPECIFICATIONS -INTERNAL FLUORESCENT ILLUMINATION -ELECTRONIC BALLAST -3" STEEL TUBE STANDARD -ALL METALWORK PAINTED PURPLE per CORPORATE SPECIFICATIONS IM11111i GRADE RECSIV 3r-6r' 0 NOV - 7 2001 2r_Orr BUILDING DEPT. COPYRIGHT 2001 SHOREJNE SIGN, INC. UOMU C3fleo 12M (�, Customer Name: Taco Bell d'sd8rc'F'.gporenorl�nalunpubashaddesgnceatedbyShorcltna9�,InaarMassuchis prdected undo federal Copyrgld Laws iM Address: Edmonds, WA alssubmi.edforyourpersondusainanrroceonwahapaJa ,.Z IanrxdbryaubySTareene 9�,Inc. if isr"ab. showntoaryanaou�ldeyo�ao�anl�non,nar�lttobeusea,rPraaa�ea coop��eeddorezhbltedln ,fashion. Thediarghg ofoolo, shaorapplcdons frnateridsorrIp�7U� OD60 lLE�0A/E r�r�7 rrtt��rraa�� n�IjUl�� jMU�(�� M Date: 1116/01 Scale: as noted Design #: Taco Bell/Edmonds alurrdroaon sha11 nd dter the basic copyrlggeadesl .lent ageeswpayt5%dare sellna prig dthed�spler depicted herdntoShoreline 9�,lne upon U�U.U�W�uUI;J Q9©� Approved Approved by: Date: demarrd deaf I s design Is used or reproduced In Wale or pad by arty party other than Shoreline Sim. Inc. um CLIENT SIGNATURE: DATE: Approved by. Date: • • Date: To: MEMORANDUM November 5, 2001 Taco Bell Street File 10119 Edmonds Way From: Kathleen Taylor, Planning Division f�-r Subject: Height Calculations Height calculations were not required for building permit application # 2001-0455 for the following reasons: • The lot is completely flat. This is not only obvious by visiting the site, but is best illustrated by the proposed grading plan in file ADB-2000-61. It denotes the existing elevation at various points on the property. The spot elevations around the building fluctuate approximately 1 foot. • The maximum height within the Planned Business zone is 25 feet from the average original grade. The building is 23 feet in height as indicated by the elevation drawings. Since this is 2 feet below the maximum height and the lot is flat, height calculations were not required. gTREEi FILE. City of Edmonds cza Planning Division 07/01/2001 21:11 2256737364 SERVICES Q. � ��'✓i �LL'Cf BLOCK SERVICES �i✓ hD Pa-j T� 04A,-✓r 6Z-6saAeF- (C 0 ow 4; 1-9* c rl,$fj `%'#Elio f fAA c-% C/W 55 pvcr tr It S << LdW WgO/ w PAGE 01 W,t JAI 1,4c- �pz.+cCF. Rflc &/N01- o c-2 4002K DA/ :5 . r4 . �s. RECEIVE® JUL - 6 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION ( 800) 914,3633 24 HRS. 206-423-8893 CELL 425-673-7364 FAX 12345 - LAKE CITY WAY #295 SEATTLE 98125 TYPICAL RIGHT LANE CLOSURE 4 LANE RD. WORK ZONE SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH 28" CONES W20-1 W20-5 W4-2 SEQUENTIAL ARROWBOARD SIGN TO CONFORM TO M. U.T. C. D, S N N%R �'VECOP�{gEfdT � 2��0 Cary OFF�1� cssCrR. DRAINAGE REPORT (& Grease Trap Sizing) ciry cc)p,, TACO BELL 10119 EDMONDS WAY 1S BY S ko 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 310 208TH ST. SE BOTHELL 98012 10 425-481-9687 January 30, 2001 D� exo,R�s S DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION As a result of a pre -application meeting on March 8, 2000, the enclosed drainage detention calculations were prepared. The site is about 0.35 acres is size and is mostly impervious. In a telephone conversation on August 4, 2000, Don Feine stated that detention is required for the 10 and 100-year storms only, predeveloped conditions can be assumed as pervious with a curve number of 85, and treatment could be accomplished using a Stormceptor. The selected Stormceptor is a model STC 900, as it has a treatment flow rate capacity of 0.635 cfs, while the release rate from the restrictor is 0.03 cfs. Currently the site slopes gently to Edmonds Way. Three on -site catch basins collect the site runoff and direct it to a storm drain in the street. No records could be found on the size of that storm drain and it was not field measured due to heavy traffic in the street. However, it was observed to be very deep, so all on -site catch basins are draining to it by gravity. In any case, the proposed storm drain system will discharge to one of the on -site catch basins, so it is not necessary to determine the pipe depth in the street. The only off - site area draining onto the site is to the east. This area is diverted by a curb and asphalt berm to the existing storm drain system downstream of the detention. The area to the north drains parallel to the site; however, if any of that area does drain to the site, it is now (and will be in the future) collected in an existing catch basin in the northwest corner of the site. As no known problems exist in the downstream system in Edmonds Way, no downstream analysis was prepared. No data could be found on the pipe, however, the peak flows will be less than the existing flows; so the impacts of the project on the existing storm drain system will be to reduce the peak flows slightly. Ll • DETENTION DESIGN t� v' a� (u O Y F` �S +o/ r m 5 o tn.-(C, bA v-o & %, Q co p e cr r (2vkm4 f219cJ' V, 3s-AC- G �•�(is j scope = z.4 TS S V Vv,ti .cj ro vN.(c Glc,,G Off— IP©SI � JO \e e Coped r •i �S �--� c. = 4 SO D I oZ-7 4c r r C w cc, c..A U-4. a t.-Ts l ( -7 0 �o � (moo S e .( e- f o D cGO �� e-L �"-O tr r't' wA 4-- & 'C e.c an G � � � r 44- ,�o (A U 9 G � w& NA. V' v wt r u- 6 �� Y' {-E' c l�• �� w c,�� •o , f> o Y� .�s s a v T" v '�, cJ s -P ct V cJ e tr Co tyro a �t�O N `c�o v' Co S, -r Cv.y.r G'b � � � lit F� �� �✓� P '�� `.�R^ A) Ut^� � <e o l Q z. ci "., Y&VJ Opp'.T. q c� c� -e �L , S i _ 8� I - cv Tr r)Z z. '� ----- ( �b)C 0, 94 `" ',?t'c` ej G q I ' e.�ov\t- 0vf4wf- X_ �o c z TY,� 10/ 9/00 Site Development Services page 1 SR-104 Taco Bell BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: al NAME: 10 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION....: 2.10 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: 85.00 TIME OF CONC.....: 47.66 min IMPERVIOUS AR ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres CN..... 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 177.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.40 s:0.0240 PEAK RATE: 0.03 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: a2 NAME: 100 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION....: 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: TIME OF CONC.....: 47.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres CN..... 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 177.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.40 s:0.0240 PEAK RATE: 0.07 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: cl SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA........ RAINFALL TYPE....: PRECIPITATION....: TIME INTERVAL....: TIME OF CONC.....: ABSTRACTION COEFF: PEAK RATE: 0.12 c f s NAME: 10 Year Fc.5 developed 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA 2.10 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres 10.00 min CN..... 86.00 6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.20 AREA..: 0.23 Acres CN:... . 98.00 VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 10/ 9/00 Site Development Services page 2 SR-104 Taco Bell ---------------------- BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: c2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA........ RAINFALL TYPE....: PRECIPITATION....: TIME INTERVAL....: TIME OF CONC.....: ABSTRACTION COEFF: PEAK RATE: 0.19 c NAME: 100 Year Postdeveloped 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres 10.00 min CN....: 86.00 6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.20 AREA..: 0.23 Acres CN..... 98.00 VOL: 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min • 10/12/00 Site Development Services page 1 SR-104 Taco Bell ------------------------- STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. det2 Description: 42inch Pipe w/ Dead Storage STAG < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAG <---- STORAGE ---- > STAG < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAG <---- STORE ---- > (ft)---cf-----Ac-Ft- (ft)--- cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft)---cf-----Ac-Ft- (ft)---cf-----Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0:0000 101.10 260.25 0.0060 102.20 530.85 0.0122 103.30 679.35 0.0156 100.10 21.450 0.0005 101.20 285.75 0.0066 102.30 552.15 0.0127 103.40 686.30 0.0158 100.20 42.900 0.0010 101.30 311.25 0.0071 102.40 573.45 0.0132 103.50 693.25 0.0159 100.30 64.350 0.0015 101.40 336.75 0.0077 102.50 594.75 0.0137 103.60 700.20 0.0161 100.40 85.800 0.0020 101.50 362.25 0.0083 102.60 607.50 0.0139 103.70 707.15 0.0162 100.50 107.25 0.0025 101.60 387.45 0.0089 102.70 620.25 0.0142 103.80 714.10 0.0164 100.60 132.75 0.0030 101.70 412.65 0.0095 102.80 633.00 0.0145 103.90 721.05 0.0166 100.70 158.25 0.0036 101.80 437.85 0.0101 102.90 645.75 0.0148 104.00 728.00 0.0167 100.80 183.75 0.0042 101.90 463.05 0.0106 103.00 658.50 0.0151 104.00 728.00 0.0167 100.90 209.25 0.0048 '102.00 488.25 0.0112 103.10 665.45 0.0153 101.00 234.75 0.0054 102.10 509.55 0.0117 103.20 672.40 0.0154 ELEV NET VOL FOR VOL FOR VOL FOR AREA 95LF 9OLF _ 100 0 0 0 0 100.5 1.43 135.85 128.7 107.25 101 3.13 297.35 281.7 234.75 101.5 4.83 458.85 434.7 362.25 102 6.51 618.45 585.9 488.25 102.5 7.93 753.35 713.7 594.75 103 8.78 834.1 790.2 658.5 W O��S Cary �r LLb oSk) z� � W 2 � � Tr �� -77 10/12/00 Site Development Services page 2 SR-104 Taco Bell ---------------------------- STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. rstrl Description: Flow Restrictor Outlet Elev: 100.00 Elev: 98.00 ft -Orifice Diameter: 0.9756 in. � Elev: 101.90 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 0.9961 in. STAG <--DISCHARGE --- > STAG <--DISCHARGE --- > STAG <--DISCHARGE --- > STAG <--DISCHARGE --- > (ft) --- cfs--------- (ft) --- cfs--------- (ft) ---------- cfs-- (ft) ---------- cfs-- 100.00 0.0000 101.10 0.0271 102.20 ------------------------------------------ 0.0531 103.30 0.0788 100.10 0.0082 101.20 0.0283 102.30 0.0562 103.40 0.0806 100.20 0.0116 101.30 0.0294 102.40 0.0591 103.50 0.0824 100.30 0.0141 101.40 0.0306 102.50 0.0617 103.60 0.0841 100.40 0.0163 101.50 0.0316 102.60 0.0642 103.70 0.0858 100.50 0.0183 101.60 0.0327 102.70 0.0665 103.80 0.0875 100.60 0.0200 101.70 0.0337 102.80 0.0688 103.90 0.0891 100.70 0.0216 101.80 0.0347 102.90 0.0709 104.00 0.0907 100.80 0.0231 101.90 0.0356 103.00 0.0730 100.90 0.0245 102.00 0.0450 103.10 0.0750 101.00 0.0258 102.10 0.0495 103.20 0.0769 10/12/00 Site Development Services page 3 SR-104 Taco Bell --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH RWWW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAR-> STORAGE <-------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Year Design ............... 0.03 0.12 det2 rstrl 101.76 11 427.52 ✓� 100 Year Design .............. 0.07 0.19 det2 rstrl 102.96 123.72 ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD 10 Year Design 0.03 0.12 det2 rstrl 101.76 0.03 11 , 100 Year Design 0.07 0.19 det2 rstrl 102.96 0.07 12 o ko, Technical Manual Page 12 , rm Stormceptor units provide storage capacities (sediment and oil) from 108 ft' to 1000 ft' (Table 3). Table 3 also indicates the maximum treatment flow rate of the various Stormceptor units. These flow rates indicate the threshold when bypassing begins to occur. At flowrates greater than the maximum treatment flowrate, treatment is still provided in the unit at 80% to 90% of the maximum treatment flowrate (NWRI, 1993). The treatment rate decreases once the unit begins to bypass since the overflow creates a backwater on the outlet pipe (See figure 2, page 6). Table 3 Stormceptor Capacities* Model Maximum Treatment Flowrate (gal/min)* Maximum Treatment Flowrate (ft'/sec)* Orifice Opening (in.) Sediment Capacity (ft3) Oil Capacity (gal) Total Holding Capacity (gal) /Z STC 900 285 .635 6 75 280 950 STC 1200 285 6.635 6 110 280 1230 STC 1800 285 0.635 6 195 280 1830 STC 2400 475 1.058 8 180 880 2495 STC 3600 475 1.058 8 345 880 3750 STC 4800 800 1.782 10 465 1025 5020 STC 6000 800 1.782 10 610 1025 6095 STC 7200 1110 2.473 12 725 1100 7415 * approximate, without by-passing DII Stormceptor° Technical Manual Page 26 Appendix H c STC 900 Precast Concrete Stormce ptor® (900 US Gallon Capacity) STORMCEPTOR COVER AND GRATE GRADE ADJUSTERS SUIT FINISHED GRI NOTE : 1. THE USE OF FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS IS RECOMMENDED AT THE INLET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. THE COVER SHOULD BE POSITIONED OVER THE OUTLET DROP PIPE AND THE VENT PIPE 3. THIS IS A GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING. CONSULT LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS. SEE NOTE #1 VENT VARIABLE DIA. 1631 18" LRUBBER GASKET PER ASTM C 443 ENLARGED OUTLET CONNECTION DETAIL STC-900 REVISED 6/97 • 0 . 0 GREASE TRAP SIZING I L✓�t aotJ x re6kAtfOA �a }-�'c. c�ocr S c (off x S x it S Z Om U4� (Gr,,`odLo f V 1V/ ( • L A \ , Dim. "B" / GREA$ONTERCEPTORS SINGLE VAULT SYSTEM Dim."A" 600-6000 Gallon Capacities Clear Access Openings Grout Both Sides + "� = 1 Precast Divider + - -j—f \ , A PLAN VIEW Slot Both Sides 24" Dia. Locking Frame and Cover r OPTIONAL Adjust To Grade Air and Gas Tight 1 Vent Pipes 3 Places ( 2 Places on 577-GA ) L r --i r-' I i- Q / / 0 Inspection Tee INLET �I Typical I I 6" o I I I Li I I I Tee or Elbow J -1 Dim "E" I I Water Depth I I I I I I ^LJ II - I I I I I I I OUTLET I I C Dim "C" I I 2' 6" I I Dim "D" Grout All Around Slot Both Sides 2/3 Length 1/3 Leni SECTION VIEW AA GALLON CAPACITY 600 750. 9 100 1250 1500 1750 2000 2500 2750 3000 40 50 6000 UV Co. MODEL No. 577-GA 577-GA 577-GA -G 4484-GA 5106-GA '5106-GA 612-GA 612-GA 612-GA 712-GA 712-GA 818-GA 818-GA DIM "A" 7'-0" 7'-0' 7'-0• 9'-0' 9'-0' 11'-2" 1l'-2' 12'-8" 12'-8" 12'-8" 13-1" 13'-1' 19'-11' 19'-ll' DIM "B" 4'-8' 4'-8' 4'-8" 5'-0" 5'-8" 5'-8• 6'-8" 6'-8" 6'-8" 8'-0" 8'-0" 9'-11' 9'-11" DIM "C" 7'-0' T-0' 7'-0' 7'-2' 7'-2" T-2" 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0' 8'-7" 8'-7" 8'-11' 10'-5" DIM "D -6" 4'-3" 1 5'-2" 4'-4" 4'-11" 4'-7" 5'-6" 6'-0" 5'-0• 6'-6" 6'-2" 7'-2' WATER DEPTH DIM "E" 1 3'-2" 1 S-11' 4'-11* f S-10" 4'-10' 4'-0" 4'-7' 3'-10" 4'-9" 5'-3" 1 4'-7' 1 6'-1' 1 4'-9' 5'-9' DESIGN CRITERIA Uniform Plumbing Code - Appendix H Number Of Meals Waste Flow Retention Storage - CAPACITY Per Peak Hour X Rate X Time X Factor - IN GALLONS UTILIT'l '/.AUL7' C0Iv1PANY '.O. 3OX 588 ?hone (253) 339-3500 NOTES: 1. Concrete: 28 Day Compressive Strength fc = 4500 psi 2. Reber: ASTM A-615 Grade 60 3. Mesh: ASTM A-185 Grade 65 4. Design: ACI-318-89 Building Code AS/TM C-857 "Minimum Structural Design Loading For Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures" 5. Loads: H-20 Truck Wheel w/ 309/6 Impact Per AASHTO 6. Fill w/ Clean Water Prior To "Start -Up" Of System 7. Contractor To Supply and Install All Piping and Sampling Tees 8. GRAY WATER ONLY, Black Water Shall Be Carried By Separate Side Sewer. A +uourn. Nasnington v�807 1,-9588 lax (253) , 35-201 • ITEMS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. Copyright a I M 0 owca.n. Rec wr-. All Rights Reserved 124 Issue: January, 1996 —77*.�-- .�" _^"�p'•+'d:.^P°r�.w.r�u-!-.r-+.-aT,.�+u^rs•.. �..M.. y,� ..y..i-+•!-n..>' _ �..n - -'77 Received Jan-22-01 03:41pm from 2831293 SDS JAM-22-01 MOM*36 LDG Arch i ti 9 i ' DEVELOPMENT 5 ?�a' e� 2 cay OF FStR PES Cr. ✓J r 1 t I t=er ct: rr-r � t'47v�9 t-�p � C: �!-� S T'�-� f �� •e..F-a.c �. ,� (too �-- s �a1 r .5 0 fl %� 14%ro C Y T! j �tM O t•L� V S tt to tc,,, rt $ 1b v+14,�, Q �p T..'p �1 r1 .,caCOP p G s "`""`-.""----, Prop � fey scoP,& -2,4 of �i> �01�' • A-3sV a ip c8 tVrs Qrovvl td r r �...� � r~ .t �` o t3S pC1 r,o � � � 8 SO 'a ,,Q.e=•".� Q9 . Z � G l� e W v e' d V .S i9 r� a '✓t S~00.. r ° ct- do 1 2�c (cam=$fir c0 jrAc ' page 7 R . 07 Received Jan-22-01 03:41pm JAM - 2 2- 0 1 M 0 N 3 E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN from 2831293 4 SDS LDG Ar c-h 1 t- e-c-" FIGURE III-1.1 Volume Correction Factor to be Applied to Streambank Erosion Control BMFe Based on Site Impervious Cover SITH IMPERVIOUS COVER COO Vb ,v y page 8 P _ 09 111-1-3 F£BRUARY,, 19§2 Received Jan-22-01 03:41pm from 2831293 SDS page 9 TAN-22-01. 1110 ter^ = 7 LDG Far e h i oe P 09 10/12/00 Site Development Services page 3 -SR-104 Taco Bell LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MARX-MFUN -SM- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STOM <........ DFSC:RiMON--------- > (da) (cfs) --id- --id- <-S=> id VOL W) 10 Year Desip ............... 0.03 0.12 det2 rstrl 101.76 11 427.52 100 Year Design .............. 0.07 0.19 det2 rstrl 102.96 12 653.?Z u C-C ROUTING CO SON.TABLE + DESCRIPTION MATCH PEAK R- kFLOW PEAK STO DIS No. No. PEAK STG PEAK OUT OUT HYD 10 Year Design 100 Year Design 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.19 det2 rstrl det2 mul 101.76 102.96 0.03 0.07 A i 11 12 , m k� I-ef- Qj (It it 4y ? 51�0C'r^ ,.e, 4or ^ Rece-ived Jan-22-01 03:41p r from 2831293 SDS I-TAN-22- 0 1 r-10 TWA& 39 L-DG At- c-h i page 10 P . 1 0 GREASE TRAP SIZING i.r,c 1.89v so M CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning. • Building • Engineering February 9, 2001 Mike Bailey WnBURT Linardic Design Group Suite 260 1319 Dexter Ave N Seattle, WA 98109 RE: Taco Bell/Pizza Hut Access Easement and Trash Enclosure Dear Mr. Bailey,. GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR It has come to my attention that a private access easement exists across the northern 20 feet of the property at 10119 Edmonds Way. You are vested in the Hearing Examiner's approval, and you may proceed at your own risk to commence improvements in accordance with that approval. I am writing to advise you of the potential consequences of objections by the holder of the easement. If the holder of the easement objects or complains prior to issuance of the building permit, the city will suspend approval of the building permit. If the holder of the easement complains following issuance of the building permit, the City may withhold issuance of a final occupancy permit until the dispute between you is resolved.. While you are free to proceed with the permitting process, it is in your best interest to obtain vacation of the easement as soon as possible. If the easement remains and the holder of the easement objects, the trash enclosure may not remain in the access easement area. Moving the trash enclosure to an alternative location will require Architectural Design Board (ADB) review. A new ADB application must be submitted, reviewed by staff, and reviewed by the ADB. The estimated time to process the application is two to three months. Sincerely, A Kathleen Taylor Planner 1.ncorporcted Aucus± 11. lgon Sister Gtu Hekinan, Jauar CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning• Building • Engineering December 1, 2000 Edi Linardic LDG 1319 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 260 Seattle, WA 98109 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR SUBJECT: Traffic Study for Taco Bell/Pizza Hut —10111 Edmonds Way (ADB 00-061) Dear Edi, This letter is to inform you that we have approved the traffic report for the subject application with one exception: there can only be one access allowed to the site. When engineered drawings are submitted for our review, the drawings must show the single access. In addition, we will need a revised trip distribution site plan for the traffic report that illustrates the single access point you plan to use. The traffic mitigation fee is $4000, and was calculated using 20 peak p.m. trips at $200 per trip. This fee can be paid when the building permit is issued. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1324. Sincerely, llala'�uo� L LE CHRISMAN Development Services Engineer ALC/cmc c: Kathleen Taylor, Planner GAENGRU-YLEuacobe11-0061.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • C;c4nr (';fit - Molf;nan Jnnan Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM August 31, 2000 Lyle Chrisman Maryanne Zukowski Taco bell traffic report One access is approved for right in right out only access point. Please note the median is being modified near this location in the future and will require the structural components for right in right out access. (This increases the left turn pocket to 102"d PL., no other modifications are proposed.) Other access points are required to be closed. This is a new business; access points do not have grandfathering. The report does not warrant sight distance availability for two access points as proposed. Please have the applicant provide: Mitigation costs proposed, revised sight plan and re -submit a modified report. The applicant needs to be aware that fatalities have occurred in the 100`h/SR- 104 intersection that is not noted in this document. Thanks. City of Edmonds Date: June 14, 2000 DF To: Lyle Chrisman/Don Fiene/Kathleen Taylor From: Maryanne Zukowski [0'( Subject: Taco Bell SR;KReview for Traffic Impact Analysis The application as submitted is incomplete for a SEPANreview of the traffic impact report as submitted by the applicant. Please have the applicant address the following as minimum requirements for submittal review per the ITE guidelines. Roadway operations: The applicant has provided the sufficient information with regards to the project description. • The applicant will need to provide additional information for existing conditions include LOS impacts at the SR104/100th Ave intersection and the SR104/15th St. intersection. Site access and on -site circulation: The applicant will need to provide the following: • Per the City of Edmonds Community Development Code "Highway Access Management" the applicant will need to address the enclosed requirements for a class 4 highway. The adjacent properties access points will also need to be shown. If a right in right out access is proposed, please provide the the proposed design. • Please provide a diagrammatic analysis of the on -site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles; as it effects the other commercial developments and the access proposed. Identify conflicts and/or mitigation strategy. Safe 3-year accident history for the (2) intersections as stated above, and at the MP vicinity of the proposed access points. Please retain this information from the WSDOT and the Edmonds Police Department. Provide information within this report for the street frontage landscaping for impacts to sidewalk areas and sight distances. (Contact the Parks Department for assistance on landscaping impacts to the Right of Way). If there are safety conflicts from an accident analysis, please provide a mitigation strategy for improvements. Identify if the proposed access points meet the sight distance requirements for the geometrics on SR-104 at a design speed of 40 MPH. Neighborhood impacts: This is complete per this report. Mitigation measures: The trip distribution and assignment is accepted per the report as long as the additional information is provided for the LOS impacts at the signalized intersections. City of Edmonds • • The interim mitigation fee for peak PM trip distribution in the downtown area is at $200.00/per .peak PM trip. Pagel of 3 (4) Class four. a Functional characteristics: These highways have the capacity for moderate travel speeds and moderate traffic volumes for medium and short travel distances providing for intercity, intracity, and intercommunity travel needs. There is a reasonable balance between direct access and mobility needs for highways in this class. This class is to be used primarily where the existing level of development of the adjoining land is more intensive and where the probability of major land use changes is less probable than on class three highway segments. Highways in this class are typically distinguished by existing or planned nonrestrictive.medians. Restrictive medians may be used as operational conditions warrant to mitigate turning, weaving, and crossing conflicts. Minimum connection spacing standards should be applied if adjoining properties are redeveloped. (b) Access control design standards: (i) It is the intent that the design of class four highways be generally capable of achieving a posted speed limit of.thirty to thirty-five mph in urbanized areas and thirty-five to forty-five mph in rural areas. In rural areas, spacing of intersecting streets, roads, and highways shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one-half mile. Less than one-half mile intersection spacing may be permitted, but only when no reasonable alternative access exists. In urban areas and developing areas where higher volumes are present or growth that will require signalization is expected in the foreseeable future, it is imperative that the location of any public access be planned carefully to ensure adequate signal progression. Where feasible, major intersecting roadways that may ultimately require signalization shall be planned with a minimum of one-half mile spacing. Addition of all new connections, public or private, that may require signalization will require an engineering analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. (ii) Private direct access: (A) No more than one access shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that additional access_points would not adversely . affect the desired function of the state highway in accordance with ^the assigned access classification, and would not adversely affect the safety or operation of the state highway. (B) The minimum distance to another public or private access connection shall be two hundred fifty feet. Nonconforming connection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose highway frontage, topography, or location would otherwise preclude issuance of a conforming connection permit. (C) Variance Dermits may be allowed if conditionswarrant and are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the department by a:traffic analysis, signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, who is registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW, which is included with the connection permit application. http://search.leg.wa.gov/wslwac/WAC%20468%.../WAC%20468%20-%2052%20-040.ht 06/14/2000 •► � � Page 2 of 3 (5) Class five. (a) Functional characteristics: These highways have the capacity for moderate travel speeds and moderate traffic volumes for primarily short travel distances providing for intracity and intracommunity trips primarily for access to state highways of higher classification. Access needs may generally be higher than the need for through traffic mobility without compromising the public health, welfare, or safety. These highways will generally have nonrestrictive medians. (b) Access control design standards: (i) It is the intent that the design of class five highways be capable of achieving a posted speed limit of twenty-five to thirty- five mph. In rural areas, spacing of intersecting streets, roads, and highways shall be planned with a minimum spacing of one - quarter mile. Less than one -quarter mile spacing may be permitted where no reasonable alternative exists. . In urban areas and developing areas where higher volumes are present or growth that will require signalization is expected in the foreseeable future, it is imperative that the location of any public access be planned carefully to ensure adequate signal progression. Where feasible, major intersecting roadways that may ultimately require signalization shall be planned with a minimum of one -quarter mile. spacing. Addition of all new connections, public or private, that may require signalization will require an engineering analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW. (ii) Private direct access: (A) No more than one access shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that additional access points would not adversely affect the desired function of the state highway in accordance with the assigned access classification, and would not adversely affect the safety or operation of the state highway. (B) The minimum distance to another public or private access connection shall be one hundred twenty-five feet. Nonconforming connection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose highway frontage, topography, or location would otherwise preclude issuance of a conforming connection permit. (C) Variance permits may be allowed if conditions warrant and are demonstrated to the satisfaction of the department by a traffic analysis, signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer, who is registered in accordance with chapter 18.43 RCW, which is included with the connection permit application. (6) Corner clearance. Corner clearances for connections shall meet or exceed the minimum connection spacing requirements of the applicable access class where the highway segment has been assigned a classification. A single connection may be placed closer to the intersection, in compliance with the permit application process specified in chapter 468-51 WAC, and in accordance with the following criteria: (a) If, due to property size, corner clearance standards of this http://search.leg.wa.gov/wslwac/WAC%20468%.../WAC%20468%20-%2052%20-040.ht 06/14/2000 r w • • Page 3 of 3 chapter cannot be met, and where joint access meeting or exceeding the minimum corner clearance standards cannot be obtained,. or is determined by the department to be not feasible because of conflicting land use or conflicting traffic volumes or operational characteristics, then the following minimum corner clearance criteria may be used: CORNER CLEARANCE AT INTERSECTIONS With Restrictive Median Position Access Allowed Minimum (feet) Approaching Right In/Right Out 115 intersection Approaching Right In Only 75 intersection Departing Right In/Right Out 230* intersection Departing Right Out Only 100 intersection Without Restrictive Median Position Access Allowed Minimum (feet) Approaching Full Access 230* intersection Approaching Right In Only 100 intersection Departing Full Access 230* intersection Departing Right Out Only 100 intersection *For Access Class 5 and for speeds less than thirty-five mph, one hundred twenty-five feet may be used. (b) In cases where connections are permitted under the above criteria, the permit issued in compliance with chapter 468-51 WAC shall contain the following.additional conditions: (i) There shall be no more than one connection per property frontage on the state highway. (ii) When joint or alternate access meeting or exceeding the minimum corner clearance standards becomes available, the permit holder shall close the permitted connection, unless the permit holder shows to the department's satisfaction that such closure is not feasible. (iii) Variance permits are not allowed. [Statutory Authority: Chapter 47.50 RCW. 99-06-035 (Order 188), § 468-52- 040, filed 2/25/99, effective 3/28/99. Statutory Authority: RCW 47.01.101 and chapter 47.50 RCV,. 93-03-033 (Order 135), § 468-52-040, filed 1/13/93, effective 2/13/93.1 http://search.leg.wa.gov/wslwac/WAC%20468%.../WAC%20468%20-%2052%20-040.ht 06/14/2000 ��nad Do aumDam a traffic design transportation planning 1319 Dexter Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109 (206) 285-9035 Suite 270 FAX 285-6345 May 18, 2000 LDG . 1319 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 260 Seattle, WA. 98109 1. ATTN: Edi Linardic Subject: Trip Generation/Assignment for Edmonds Taco BeIVPizza Hut at 10119 Edmonds Way Dear Edi: The purpose of this letter is to provide the City of Edmonds with a brief summary of the trip generation/assignment associated with the development of a Taco Bell/Pizza Hut restaurant within the city limits of Edmonds. It is my understanding that this information will be used to determine any appropriate traffic mitigation for this project. PROTECT DESCRIPTION The subject site is located on the northerly side of Edmonds Way at 10119 Edmonds Way. The parcel is currently a vacant paved/graveled flat site that was previously occupied by a gas station several years ago. Three curb cuts are currently present along the site frontage on Edmonds Way. There is also a latte stand located close to, or adjacent to, the project's property line. The subject parcel is part of a larger commercial area that includes a QFC, an antique mall, and a variety of small businesses including a restaurant, video store, drycleaner, liquor store, and card shop. The parking areas for these various businesses are shared, and access to the parking area is provided from both 100' Avenue West and Edmonds Way. The proposed Taco Bell/Pizza Hut is 1682 square feet and includes a drive -through window, which is expected to serve the majority of the patrons. Ten parking stalls will be provided on -site. Access to the parcel will be from Edmonds Way, with an internal connection to the adjacent commercial property. The existing driveway located on the northwest corner of the property will be moved to the southeast about 40 to 45 feet and limited to right -turns. The existing middle driveway will be eliminated, and the existing 30-foot wide driveway located on the southeast corner of the property will be retained. It is our understanding that this driveway was originally intended to be eliminated and the middle driveway retained, however, due to the presence of an access easement, this driveway will be retained in order to serve the adjacent commercial area and the project site. A vicinity map of the area is shown on Figure 1. EXISTING The proposed Taco Bell/Pizza Hut is located along a State highway that serves both regional and local traffic. The following describes those streets in the immediate vicinity of the site. Edmonds Way (a.k.a. SR-104) is a predominantly east -west State highway striped for two through lanes in each direction, with some center islands or left -turn lanes, which provides access to the Edmonds -Kingston Ferry and I-5. Curbs, gutters, and sidewalk have been installed on both sides of the street. The street is fronted primarily by commercial development, and some single-family residences. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the proposed project is,35 mph. 100' Avenue West (SO Avenue) is a north -south arterial that provides a connection between the south City Limits northward to SR-524. The street is striped for two lanes with on -street parking along most sections of the street. Four lanes plus left - turn storage have been striped in the project vicinity to south of 2380, Street SW. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk have been installed along both sides of the street and the speed in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. A traffic signal controls the intersection of 100* Avenue West at SR-104 and three all -way stops have been installed further to the north of the site. The street is fronted by single-family residences, and some commercial development is present in the vicinity of SR-104. TRIP GENERATION 'The ITE M, D Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997 - 6th Edition, is typically used to estimate trip generation for new development. Land Use Code 834 (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through Window) has been chosen as the land use that best represents the proposed development. It should be noted that many of the trips associated with a fast-food restaurant would either be pass -by trips (i.e. driving past the site) or diverted trips, and therefore would not be new' to the adjacent street system. The ITE Trip Generation Manual indicates that a fast-food restaurant would have a 45 % pass -by trip rate during the AM peak hour and a 47 % rate during the PM peak hour. The diverted trip rate would be 27 % during the AM peak hour and 24 % during the PM peak hour. The diverted trips 2 are expected to come from 100' Avenue West, whereas the pass -by trips will be from Edmonds Way driving by the site. Table 1 summarizes the estimated number of trips using the average trip rates and the noted reduction for. the pass -by trips. No adjustment has been made for the diverted trips. TABLE 1 ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION TACO BELL/PIZZA HUT (1682 SF) NET NEW/ TRIP TOTAL LESS DIVERTED TIME PERIOD RATE TRIPS PASS -BY* TRIP Daily 496.12 834 334 500 AM Peak Hour In 43 19 24 Out 41 19 22 Total 49.86 84 38 46 PM Peak Hour In 29 13 16 Out 27 13 14 Total 33.48 56 25 31 * - Pass -by rate of 45 % used for AM peak hour and 47 % for PM peak hour per HE Trip Generation Manual. No rate for daily trips was provided by ITE so a rate of 40 % was used. The trip generation summary indicates that the project will generate a relatively small amount of new or diverted traffic. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT The trip distribution/assignment for the project has been shown on Figures 2, 3, and 4. It should be noted that these values are approximate and may vary from day to day. The distribution has been based on an examination of the adjacent street system and the location of the surrounding residential population. Figure 2 shows the estimated trip distribution for the project by percent,and daily volume for the new and diverted trips. 3 Figures 3 and 4 show the new and diverted trip assignment for the AM and PM peak hours. These figures show the relatively small impact that the project would have on any given street. Furthermore, about half of the trips noted on the figures are diverted trips, i.e., trips already out on the streets in the vicinity that "divert" to the site to make a purchase. Thus, the true impact of the project is even less than shown. SITE ACCESS As noted earlier, access to the Taco Bell/Pizza Hut will be from Edmonds Way, with an internal connection to the adjacent commercial property that allows access to 100t° Avenue West. The driveway located near the northwest corner of the property will be limited to right -turns in and out, and primarily serve drive -through traffic that is exiting the site. The existing 30 foot wide driveway located on the southeast corner of the property that will be retained currently serves traffic entering and exiting the existing commercial plaza. It is located directly across from one of the driveways that serves McDonald's, and therefore, does not suffer from the offset problem present along the 100' Avenue West driveways serving Albertson's and QFC. The raised center island present along Edmonds Way ends about 35 feet northwest of this driveway and therefore provides limited transition and storage space for left -turns entering the commercial site. This condition has existed for years, however, if the City Staff feels that modifications are needed, only two reasonable options exist. These would include either removing a portion of the island and extending the two-way left -turn lane to provide more storage space, or extend the island to limit access to right -turns only. This latter modification would likely impact McDonald's and also force entering left -turns to the commercial site to use a driveway located further to the southeast. Therefore, if a modification is deemed to be needed, then the first option is more desirable since it would have a lesser impact on the existing businesses and improve a pre-existing condition. 'The estimated peak hour volumes at the site accesses are shown on Figures 5 and 6 and include the pass -by, diverted, and new trips. CONCLUSIONS The proposed development of a combination Taco Bell/Pizza Hut may result in a slight increase in traffic along the streets in the vieinity of the site. The project is located in an area of similar uses, and will be built on a parcel that was previously occupied by a gas station that likely generated a similar volume of traffic. No new accesses are proposed to serve the site, and, in fact, one existing driveway along the site frontage will be removed. The site is expected to serve traffic passing by the site primarily to and from the ferry terminal, as well as the adjacent neighborhoods. The Taco Bell/Pizza Hut will offer an alternative to the existing fast-food restaurants in the vicinity, and may, in reality, only divert business to this site from other businesses, rather than generate new traffic. 4 As noted above, the existing 30 foot wide driveway located on the southeast corner of the property will be retained as part of prior access easements. The raised center island present along Edmonds Way ends about 35 feet northwest of this driveway and therefore provides limited transition and storage space for left -turns. If the City Staff feels that modifications are needed, then removing a portion of the island and extending the two- way left -turn lane to provide more storage space is recommended since it would have a lesser impact on the existing businesses and improve a pre-existing condition. We trust that the above information will allow the City of Edmonds Staff to complete their review of the project and determine any mitigation fees associated with. the new trips generated by this project. If you, or any of the City Staff, should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Geri Reinart, P.E. David I. Hamlin and Associates Attachments 5 FIGURES At NORTH PROJECT VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 • • NORTH NOTE: N DIVERTED TRIPS ONLY ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION (BY PERCENT & DAILY VOLUME) FIGURE 2 • • NORTH NOTE: , DIVERTED TRIP5 ONLY 1d ESTIMATED AM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT N d ASSOGIATFS I FIGURE 3 �N NORTH t �J Q I PIN ST. 15* Q ` I mi In V-1 4 —2 220TH 5T:5kZ; N �5 �I > I = I 6 ~� Imo-- 24 H ST. SW 0 226TH I I I I 2 ST• 8 PROJEC SITE 2 9 3j>2 2 2 = 232NO ST. SW a_ Q � z SR-104 23 298 ST. SA NOTE: VOLUMES ARE FOR NEW d _ ?j DIVERTED TRIPS ONLY _ U oo. o 0 - 2 - 2-,goov. od. - 2 / o 12,11 Ian ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT DAVID I. HAMLIN d ASSOCIATES FIGURE 4 TACO BELL/PIZZA HUT PAGE EDMONDS, WA. F-4 NORTH (5)--------------------- - �I) �(5) 4 5 13) (13) XX - NEW OR DIVERTED TRIPS �Q,{ (XX)- PASS -BY TRIPS ' Y� ESTIMATED AM PEAK HOUR SITE ACCESS TRIPS DAVID I: HAMLIN d ASSOCIATES FIGURE 5 TACO BELL/PIZZA HUT PAGE EDMONDS, WA. F-5 r NORTH --------------------- 2 1 8) (B) XX - NEW OR DIVERTED TRIPS (XX)- PA55-BY TRIPS ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR SITE ACCESS TRIPS LIN t AssouATFS FIGURE 6 FEH+-03=80 01:15 PM O IC FOODS OF WA u., u,#; as 51,v 21:55 FAX 2061211 200-932-1211 206 % 2675 P.06 @ 006 Applied CooteahnoloOY Irne. June 13, leas 13,236-002 Mr. William r. Vivian Cull Industries Inc. $404 TOUr-th Avenue South seattl6. Washington 98124 Oder Bill, Tank Ramonu Mmultoring services E000nds Texaco Station (pbrrser I>1tll Station Va. 276) 10119 tdoeonds lty . Rebmcds. V%hiiwton M1 ThIS letter suMmdr Uss Applied Gdatechnology Inc.•s (art) geotechnical *has- neerinll services during clown -up of soil and groundwater cantanination at a Texaco Service Station (formerly Gull Station No. a7S). Our sorvics, included a preliminary assess ant in September 1037. and monitoring of tank removal and ctntam;riation cleanup in. iMay logo. The station is one of ten mold by Cull Industries Inc. to Teaaao VSA. The Sales AgrOftent allowed for ekes-qp subfiGVent to the data of olosurs, with a formula for Joint financial respoesibility. It also called for Clean-up r to occur concurrently with Texaco's removal and replacement of teaks and lines whenever possible. and that vas the case for this property,. $age and M2291M The purpose of our ssrvices during clean-up at the ditd was to verify, in our proissmionsl opinion, that aey hydragarbon contamiAation identified Is cleaned up to a reasonable and practical standard which is in conforaaras with current government regulations. A romsdixtion strategy to seat this 904l was outliAod in our propgSal letter dated October L2, two Th* seeks Agreement made this strategy the $Cope and procedures for clean-up Of each sits. Achioving a clean sit* determination irmlved as many as tour phaeog, sukanarixed as followse Ph"* I. Tank removal and soil excavation to the extent practical. If Ye judged that all S30nificahtly contaminatod soil vas removed, the site veuld be clean. phase *. SyppieAontai t9ftiug, investigation. and rick &saess,aent. I# we Judged that 00 aclditlonekl ramediation tree warranted to protect hutted health or the envirornmont, the Site would be clean. 30C 12CM Awe. N9 P-0 ftit aaas 0010VYe. WA' 96008 T�I�phens OOe�4��•90�� FIEB-0TP-00 01:16 PM IC FOODS OF WA 206� 2975 P.07 u4, u 4, Nd W .N L t ; 08 F.0 20 21211 206-932-1211 Q009 Mr- William T. Vivian Aevrrsd Oeoesohnnloay in*. Gull Industriv4 Inc. : ne 13. L909 lea Phase 3. prepare and UVIGmerst ramadieeion plan, when secondary alaan- Up had seduced clean. rinks to a level wa judged acceptable, the site would be at liwtae i- Remedlation monitoriap. This task was to be perfowaad as ned- esaarq to verify clean-np level; most risk aeoossmens rvgUrem*ats. The specific scope of our sorviaes few the Edmonds Teagco service station began with a pseliminary assessment to evaluate the extend and magnitude of hydrocarbon caotaRinatlon in the AWlov ground t ear to sand m acitudes. sells. Our scope during tank removal lay to identity and isolate contamination, to docent Cleanup levels during excavation, end to provide recomtendatioas for eoiremo 2atton and disposal of Contaminated materials, if required. s p y. our scope included the fotlovinpt Pro } imi_ n® .=t_ o Review regional geoloQyr and available groundwater data. o Review preexisting work by other contractors at this site. e booument integrity of excavated tanks and delivery lines. o Condlsat on -site surveillance of petroleum hydrocarbon clwanup Imp - Sim via soil headspe4o analysis during the active excavation. o Direct excavation activities to determine lateral o tent of soil contamination and to aegregats Contaminated material. o Prepare this report describing the investigation rasulta. along vith supporting data. Our ass"smont included review of subsurface data from Norton Corrosioa Lim- ited. Inc., tank integrity testing by Hunter Environmental services. 2no., and available publicationd on soil and groundwater in the vicinity. :e pre- sented our findings to Cull ie a letter dated septsnber =s, ieal. only low levels of contamination. considered normal background for service stations. were !ones in subsurface soils outside of the tank backfili. There was evi- dence e:9 limited contamination in the tank backfili, but no signs of free produce. We felt the observed level of nail Contamination was not indica- tive Of serious product loss. We did suggest, hovever. that any lost prod- t9t could potontlallyr migrate downward to the ester table through the rela- tively permeable underlying sands and gravels. FED-03=00 01:16 PM IC FOODS OF WA L#e,vyiov OLA I1;01 FAA 20 .1211 208 932-1211 Kr. William T. Ylvian Gull Indubtriea rna. rune 43. ISO$ Page 3 Alto Desc j.,.. 206 % 2975 P.06 008 Appiwd Q.ofechnefe"lAc. The Fdmonda Station Is bounded by a cw*tery to the AOrth, a cotamvraial ground s LO the east acid Highwayeve 104 (Edmonds way) to the vauthwaat. 'fig ground surface is relatively level. sloping gently down toward the highway, Five io-year old stasl tanks ware r"CrAw. Their capacities 6000, twere 5400, 000, l0,000, and 10,000 gallons. They were Aestod together hear the eastern propart'v 1140. southeast of the cashiers booth ik,tosk), and lay with their ends pointing east and west. Baaod an subaurface condition& vkposed during tank removal, our revi4V of the Norton Corrosion boring data, and published gsalogionl Saps, the alto is underlain by { to d feet Of gravelly to silty send, Underlain. by tip to 7 test of poorly -graded gray Sand. recosslonai outwash depcdita. Those soils are believed to represent Groundwater W not encountered during the tank removal. nor in Norton Corrosion boring drilled to a depth of as teat. Ke believe there is a groundwater table at Creator depth in the vutwash. The interred direattiom of arounduatar flov Is toward the northwest. Tesoaoo oontrected En ConstrUotion for the reaovAl of all five undergnuAd tanks and associated delivery lines and replacement vith four new to.000 gallon fiberglass tanki. A Sew tank Cast was excavated, extending approxi. Mutely ao feet southeast from the original tank nest. The new t%nXa wvse laid in the tame orientation as the old tanks. tmavation begun an ftY Z, 199a. Our reprosentative wee on --site from than until May N, 1989. ye observed the exposed snbeurface c*nditims and moni- tored soil contftinttiou using a portable organic vapor water (OVK). using odor levels. visual observations, and CVK readings of Organic vapors ereanat- in0 from representative soil samples. ve directed soil cleanup and deter- mined when all signitica�ttly Contaminated aoii was removed. grab *eagles of Soils in the backhoe scoop were regularly Monitored, along with hand dugsafoDlea Collected along the excavation walls, As azMvetioa proaoedod, two zones Of sipuifieantly contaminated sail were ditf•reatiated from uneanta=nilfatad arses, Significantly contaminated soil vas indieatod by OVM readings of 100 Dpm or greater, and a strong petroleum odor. Boil removal was directed wherover practical to segregate relativmly unconts"Inated loll from the afore heavily contaminated soil. During the contaminated. Thin SG i was hauled to File �andsand Gravel rfor lreem"ia ion FED-OZ-00 01:17 PM IC FOODS OF WA 206 2875 P.09 may, oo 0 t A cs:ud IAA f2a 211 808 99Y-12i Mr. William T. viviart Gull rAdustries Inc. •aorioaCeetoeM,oleeYInc. Xunq 13, 1989 Page { and temporary stockpiling prior to psrmnnent disposal at an sect;esbis land- 1 soil eves diseased fill disposal facility. UnC011t9miztated native and fil of! -site, with the exception of a quantity stockpiled smelts f4t• pee as backfiii in that part of the excavation not utilised by the sew tank nest. lsoat of the Contatgination was observed below the fill spout (seen and) of the 8,000 gallon super unleaded tank (middle tank in the tank pest) and the adjacent 10,000 gallon regular tank. The tanks shoved no signs of pitting, but there was some evidence that product. had collected tender the till spout reds of the tanks. Tha observed soil contamination probably was caused iy periodextavalr overfill spillage. Mo free product was visible at the Ctmr of excavation. Cleanup of this soil involved only a small aMMS of overexca- vatien beyond that required for excavation of the neM tank most. A smaller tone of containation WAS observed beneath the vent lines in front of the etshlexa booth on the north end of the tank nest. The source for this contamination is Oct apparent, as no active dellvory lines are presont in this area, and no appreciable contamination Kai observed In soil around vatsd until sa acceptable level wag reached. the northernmost underground tank. Contaminated soil in this area ww axe_ we soil samples were collected for chemical analysis and quaatificatian of cldanny levels. Used on the OVK readings and odor, ve were confident that the residual hydrocarbon contaminat1cm was at a level Vail below the requla- Cory cleanup action level of Soo ppm. We observed a portion of the new tank installation. The now excavation bottomed oat at about 19 feet below ground Surface. exposing the gray sand unit, The exgava "Oft base vas prepared tar new taAk installation by plaelnp approximately one toot of imported pea gravel CA, top of the sand. Your tsossitor yells. oOwlsting Of 4--inch factory -slotted PvC pips, were installed in the respective corners of the new tank neat. Ths entlre excavation around the new tanks was then fined with pet gravel, sad excavated areas outside the new tank neat were filled with clean sails Qonerated during tau excavation of the new tank nest. Concl lone Bseauee of the initial iadlcat:ions trout Varton corrosion's studies. we Irelcfurthernasss mment bO Made based u�v4l and sail obserntiona during phaa)e proceed, and Our observationa and monitoring during tank removal eoofirm that any hydro- carbon cantamlastion V48 essentially limited to a small Portion of the tarok excavation baekflll as anticipated. A small zone of contamlftstion else Ve3 unexpectedly identified beneath the vent limas;. aignlflcaat loss of Petro._ Lem product does not appear to have occurred at either of those locations. Lateral and vertical migration at the lost product appears to have been GO ieed by capillary ratontlon at the native sands and sandy backtiii. •F.EB-0�-00 01:17 PM V„ ..►.i 4c,uu MiL ICll FOODS OF WA 206% 2675 P.10 _. ••, :lo208 992 lZll QI010 Hr. William T. Vivian 4 11 Indaatrioa Ina. A"M!d a+aWohnoaor Me, June 130 lose eve s ' ie is our opinion, based on our cleats -up Monitoring and eva2uatian. that all rosiduil l tvti of co Contaminatenatd $oil h" beet► s•atepvad, that o�tly tcv Phase levels of �Rtaminatian co:,ainad its the soil ai: the c !ha_,e 1 0! the SoapQ and Procedures. Mesa Iau Levels et contamination l dimini$h rapidly with tint and reprosent no significant risk to humn health cr the onvironMA.t, Phases Z. _d, and 4 were devaed nMece"ary. andrtQC* tre oonoiu4e that the alts has been cleaned aeoordi� to the.s,�pe and Procedures, and the mlessnUD aatis#ies the dales Aaremant requ�1 aloeDt that all atteoted areas of the site meat Ga+tirnmentai standards =ai' dean soil and groundwater. Yours very truly. %/APPLIED OP0T1r LOGY INC. e;�6'rs+ �4 Charles x. Soule Xydropelopist Q o E. Kesrby, ap Pr Sidi Melosure oa. Texaco V.S.A. F•EB-03-00 01:14 PM IC FOODS OF WA 206� 2875 P.02 y, a .3LN eI:u1 Pl14k1P11 Y06-9SY 1211 ®CO? tilnm trd 1Aetratl u; Mt W. 4M7 February 28, 1994 M LTZO Report Transm::ttal 10119 Edmorde Way, Edmonds, WA Texaco Service Station # 63-232-1402 Mr.. Roger. Xye Washlagton negarr_atieot of .ecology yorthwast Region Mail Stop NS-61 3190 160th Avenue, 98 Bellevue, WA 98008-5.452 Dear Mr. Nye: Enclosed, please find a copy. of the underground Storage Tank Clcouze Report pertaining to the above -captioned Texaco service station. The report was preyarad_by Twmco's environmental consultant Gxouudwater Technology Inc.. The report documents the removal of Four single -walled fiberglsee underground storage tarJw aad ancillary piping. The report also i=cludes information. en environmental sampling and analysis. Based oat the findings of the tank removal* aesessment, na further action is required at this facility. Please feel free to contact I" at (209) 774-6090 extension 227 it you have any question regarding this report; or the site activities. sincerely, ATon a i pro Oct nager TexacG Environmental Services AJp:ajp Enclosure ARCarl ile-LAC-hun ilk-IICPFile (w/ ondlosure) PNhlz*lid (w/out enclosure) VR: , • FEB-03.-00 01:14 P.M ARM IC FOODS OF WA 206%2875 Applied Ceatschikelogr tee. 3eptembe: 31, IS47 15,258.002 Mir, William T� Vivian Cull Zndustriea, Inc. 3404 Fourth Avanue South punt 4!lice Scx 248b7 Seattle, Washington OaL24 Dear all%I Hydrocarbon Contanination Assessment Mobil Service Station (1279) 10119 Edmonds Vhy t�uaonds. Vashington P.03 ton /�� V This lazter presents .our asspsament of potential subsurface hydrocarbon cen- tamination at Your Edmonds station. We understand that Ois station is one of ton involved 1n a potential sale to Texaco. It is Tsxacala lhtsnt to replace tanks at each of the stations within the first few years after pur- chase. The .ales agsooment gives Texaco the option of requiring testing for both the presence of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater and the integrity of all tanks and lines. Cull has contracted for and supervised this testing at the Edmonds station. You asked that wo review the results ofthis test- ing, make a site visit to observe general conditions in the area, and review ether relevant intcrmation you provided. This letter summ.ari3+s the testing and our observations, and presents an asaeesmoAt of the current conditions, requirements for additional studies, and possible cleanup ;equLrements. TUK--Zntog= Tas l-w The adnionda station has five underground storage tanks. Tho tanks are understood .o have the fellooing charaeteristic4i Capacity Taa.k '1SrDe (ra�lio_nu) Qontenbs - i Stool i.000 Diesel 10 $ stool e.000 Unleaded iC 2 Steel 8,000 super Unloaded 30 i 5:ea]. 10.000 Regular to 8 steel io,000 Regular to 1"411rlLy testing Callowin4 the NSFA-329 precision 'Teat HetaGd was DerEo:tned iy h:ne :887 by hunter' &;vlronmsntal 5er�rices, Inc. All tanks and lines tasted tighe, except ;or one vent line 'Which was repaired. A leaky bung on the essoCiated tank was replaced. A retest 14dicst4d a tLght tank. Sae I-1010 A..1. His a.a. sex jails a,.aewe. WA 94006 rdleenor,e aQa:j4J a039 FED-0Z.-00 01:14 PM IC FOODS OF WA witov 0UN i1:.72 VAS f2w Z11 200 932-1211 206% 2975 P.04 1 004 Hr. Vm Lam T. vivian Gull Industries, Inc. September XL. 19S7 Page 2 _A any! kjVALV&kLjLjjin N App"d eewc.eh,164001 fi& seven teat borings were pertormed by Horton Corrosion Limited. Tnr, for the tdmonds station on AtWumt Zy. 1997. Cacnpasited soil "eplsq were obtained from depths of a feet. 10 feet, and i4 feet. The Doll samplas ware submit- ted to Aft1test. Inc. to be tented for petroleum hydroearbona using standard Hethodo 9030 and 3035 (inlrarod) for *ail extraction and anillyaie, respec- tively. and EPA Method 3090 for total lead. Th&Y were also testdd for total o1i and grease. The borings and the t0tai petroleum hydrocarbon tees re - suits are summarised in the following table. Soil fiest Results DQri�i tin Ob vat _ st� Depth to ) TPH ODOM) _ fC• Q� tt T-1 T-9 Sand, RCS at bottom Sand. none as ZZI 340 T-3 no HCs evident sand. no XCe evident none 380 0 01 T-4 Band Till. no llCs evident none none e3 24 9 43 92 112 T-S T-0 Band. no RCe evident Sand, no 1iCs evident none eg e3 46 T«7 Sand Fill, no "Ca evident none none 121 127 ii0 49 40 39 All, total paralleled lead values were 11 ppa, or leas. and the the total oil and grease results petroleum hydrocarbon reoults. site ttlons The Ed=nds station site is bounded by a cemetery to the nort:i, a commercial building to the south, Arid Highway 104. Mmonds Way) to the Southeast. The grocuid surface i4 relatively Ivvel, sloping gently Sewn toward the highway. Batted on published geological maps and Our observations. we believe ghat the site is underlain by Bonds and gravels deposited by glaaiers when they vere receaing (recensionaz outwash). Groundwater was not encountered by to 81 feet. We believe that there is a groundwater table at grsby bociags depth III tl%o cutdUh, SAd that any lost product would probably move dlr9Qtiy dcwn through :he aancs and gravels to the groundwater table. The groundwater tiew direation is to the nortmeat. Assesa ent All our observations and the test data su;part a aoncluai4n that chars are relativalp ioW levels of con;aMination .in aub3u,:face soils at thi Ed.uonds Station whica are co=ansurats with normal historical operations. No free product or indication which would auaQest vertical mOvOmOnt of oontaminatlan to the g:aunavater table was recorded. The total -petrolsuu hydrocarbon levels found probably rsatiiit frcm occasional prodwet Icaaas oithor from tank Pilling or f:cm st;rfacs ■pills at the till islands. A more specific test method using 4 pas chromatography would protabiy show even lover Levels. • FEP-03-00 01:15 PM PIC FOODS OF WA. 201% 2975 P.05 208-932-1211 11003 Mr. William T. Vivian Gull Industries, Inc• oeptembeC 2i, loaf Page 3 "Pike Oeafaahnaloey� We do not be:ieve that arty cleanup is appropriate at the rdr4nds site. and that any additional oontarninetion evaluation cars take place at the regularly sChoduled tank replacement. we reftmmond that future operat;ons at the eta, Lion include good inventory Control and tank monitoring to doted any per. act losaen boforo they become significant. IA ausamary. we conclude that the ob"rviod awii onntamination stoat likely results from normal ststiaa operations. there are no known oSL-sits no site cleanup is warranted, and food operating procedures will rimpacts. educe the risk of facture liability. .The evaluation and Conclusions in this letter Ire based on conditions encountered at the time of our obeervationa. information you provided. and our experience and engineering judComent. Our work has been to IL consistent with that 1a4e1 of oars and skill ortiinarilY performed exe saed ed I by membora of the profession currently practicing under similar oosaditions In she ores and consistent with currant regulatory requirements. Mo other war- ranty. expresd Or Implied, is made. ws approeiaCe the opportunity to assle;t cult Industries on thLa project and lack forward to working with you in the future.. If you have nay questions, please give us a call. Yours very truly. APP1,IM GEOTFCNNCLOGY INC. J ff. Newby. P. sident ' /tag E)&)ndd Do a�uM A 5 000ee WG23 traffic design transportation planning 1319 Dexter Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109 (206) 285-9035 Suite 270 FAX 285-6345 Augusta, � STREET FILE LDG 1319 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 260 Seattle, WA. 98109 ATTN: Edi, Linardic Subject: Response to Request for Additional Information for Edmonds Taco Bell/Pizza Hut Dear Edi: The purpose of this letter is to respond to the City of Edmonds' request for additional traffic information for the proposed Taco Bell/Pizza Hut development in Edmonds. This request for additional information was outlined in a memorandum from Maryanne Zukowski to Lyle Chrisman. The following summarizes my response to this request for additional information. ROADWAY OPERATIONS Request: LOS impacts for existing conditions at the intersections of SR-104/100* Avenue and SR-104/15" Street. Response: PM peak hour turning movement counts were conducted. at the intersections of SR- 104/100P Avenue and SR-104/15' Street for use in the LOS analyses. A summary of these volumes is shown' on the attached figure. Calculations for the level of service analyses.at these intersections were conducted using the McTrans.Highway Capacity Software:based on the 1997Highwav Capacity Manual. Both of the intersections arecontrolled by traffic signals. The following table shows the existing levels of service with and without the project trips. (Since the project is quite small and expected to be constructed fairly quickly, no additional background traffic was added into the existing volumes.) 71 AUG 1 5 2000 r - PLA.P44vaN t.NEPT. _YZ0/-0i TABLE 1 PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION EXISTING EXISTING W/PRO.IECT SR-104/100te Avenue EB — D (42 sec.) D (43 sec.) WB — C (33 sec.) C (33 sec.) NB — D (38 sec.) D -(38 sec.) SB — D (41 sec.) D (42 sec.) OVERALL — D (38 sec.) D (38 sec.) SR-104/151s Street EB — C (26 sec.) C (26 sec.) WB — C (25 sec.) C (25 sec.) NB — B (13 sec.) B (13 sec.) SB — B (18 sec.) B (18 sec.) OVERALL — B (17 sec.) B (17 sec.) Note: SR-104 is the east -west. movement at 100'b Avenue and the north -south movement at 15" Street. Where: LOS Deli A < 10 seconds B > 10 & < 20 seconds C > 20 & < 35 seconds D > 35 & < 55 seconds E > 55 & < 80 seconds F > 80 seconds The results of the level of serviceanalyses indicate that both of the intersections are currently operating at level of service "D" or better. It should be noted that there were periods when the eastbound queue at the intersection of SR-104/100'b Avenue did not clear out in one cycle. This was the result of intense peak periods during the ferry arrival(s) and release of vehicles. However,. once the effect of the ferry was diminished, eastbound traffic typically cleared out in one cycle. The additional trips associated with the proposed project would have little impact on the level of service at these intersections. SITE ACCESS/CIRCULATION. Request: Address the highway access management requirements for a class 4 highway. ��Q UG 15 2Q0o 2 rCcit� L®T. Response: The proposed Taco Bell/Pizza Hut is located along a State highway that serves both regional and local traffic. Current WAC requirements (section 468-52-040) for a Class four highway say that no more than one access shall be provided to an individual. parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that additional access points would not adversely affect the desired function, safety, or operation of the highway. The minimum distance to another access shall be 250 feet. Nonconforming connection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose highway frontage, topography, or location would otherwise preclude issuance of a conforming connection permit. Section 468-52-050 further states that connections permitted prior to the adoption of this chapter are not required to meet the interim N�� standards or the standards of assigned .access classification adopted in compliance with this chapter. 01 10 There are currently three accesses along the site frontage. One of these will be eliminated, the southeasterly access will remain, and the northwesterly access will be moved about 25 feet to the southeast and restricted to right turns only. The separation �y between these two remaining driveways is about 125 feet. A residential driveway is �, f' 4, located about 180 feet to the northwest of the proposed right only access. An existing commercial driveway near the back of the QFC is located about 145 feet southeast of the 1� existing site access that is proposed to remain. Although the site accesses are nonconforming for a class four highway, the redevelopment of the site would result in the elimination of one of the existing .driveways. Furthermore, these driveways were installed prior to the access control standards and do not appear to be required to meet the current standards. The southeasterly driveway must remain as part of an easement agreement for the adjacent commercial site. The right only access is a relocation of an existing access that will primarily serve the drive -through window traffic exiting the site. Sinceit is restricted to right -turns only, it would have little impact on the operation of the mainline traffic. The accident data provided in a subsequent section of this submittal showed negligible accident history at these driveways. Because of these reasons, the accesses as proposed should be allowed as nonconforming connections. (The site plan for the Taco Bell will needed to be expanded somewhat to show the access points, for the adjacent properties. This should be attached to these comments when submitted.) No special design would appear to be needed for the right only access since the raised. median limits the access. Since the driveway is proposed for right -turns in and out,. then the standard commercial driveway for Edmonds would appear to be appropriate. A "right turn only" sign could be installed for exiting traffic if the City feels this ,�, necessary to re -enforce the restriction. ' � C r ,� a v �J, AUG i 5 2000 P�iis N;4!!&,,.ti '� `'�."MT r A Li�iiL 8. do .. f7 W , e ,bo ,.jl ` O �, -y 0 C Request: A diagrammatic analysis of the on -site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles and as it effects other commercial developments and the access proposed. Identify conflicts and/or mitigation strategy. Response: Based on the current site plan, full access to the site is proposed from the southerly access and right. only access at the northerly access. The general circulation of the.site is sketched on the attached plan. The majority of vehicles are expected to use the southerly access when entering and exiting the site, although the right only access would likely serve many of the drive -through vehicles. Vehicles in the drive -through could also return to the parking area via a one-way lane in front of the building. This one-way lane is proposed to be signed accordingly. Potential conflict movements would primarily occur at the southerly access between entering and exiting left -turns. Typically those exiting would yield to the entering turns, although a stop sign for exiting vehicles could be installed to designate the right-of-way if the City so desires. Based on our conversation, you have modified the plan to show a connection between the sidewalk and the building through the landscaped area to address pedestrian and bicycle circulation. SAFETY Request: 3-year accident history at SR-104/100'h Avenue, SR-104/15'b Street, and on SR-104 in the vicinity of the site access. ✓ Response: Traffic accident data from both WSDOT and the Edmonds Police Department was requested for the locations noted. Complete WSDOT data for the years 1994 through 1996 was provided, along with partial data for 199.7 through 1999. The City of,Edmonds data is primarily for 1997 through mid-2000. The following tables summarize the data provided. e �a AUG 1 5 2000 4 TABLE 2 WSDOT ACCIDENT HISTORY ACCIDENT TYPE LOCATION PDO* INJURY FATALITY TOTAL . SR-104 at 15'h Street (MP 26.06) 1994 4 2 0 6 . 1995 3 2 0 5 1996 .1 1 0 2 1997* - - - 2 1998* - - - 1 1999* _ _ _ 2 between MP 26.23 and 26.39 1994 1 5 0 6 1995 3 0 0 3 1996 4 1 0 5 1997* - - - 6 1998* - - - 4 1999* _ _ _ 5 at 1Wh Avenue (MP 26.43) 1994 5 0 0 5 1995 4 2 0 6 .1996 4 6 0 10 1997* - - - 4 1998* - - - 2 1999* Accident data for 1997 through 1999 is in partial record format and approximately 3096' remains to be entered into the State database. k" N �0° 00AUG i 5 2000 DEPT.. 5 LOCATION TABLE 3 EDMONDS P.D. ACCIDENT HISTORY ACCIDENT TYPE PDO* INJURY FATALITY TOTAL . SR-104 at 15" Street 1997 - - - 0 1998 - - - 0 1999 - - - 0 2000 - - _ - 1 in vicinity of site access 1997 - - - 4 1998 - - - 4 1999 - - - 4 2000 - - - 1 at 1001 Avenue 1997 - - - Not Provided 1998 - - - 6 1999 - - 9 2000 - - 6 Note: Data for 2000 through June. A comparison of the WSDOT records with those from the Edmonds Police Department indicates that in most cases a higher number of accidents was reported by WSDOT for their partial records in 1997 through 1999 than those reported by the Police .Department for the entire year. This discrepancy is likely a result of entry errors by one or both of the jurisdictions and no attempt to resolve this discrepancy has been attempted for this submittal. CM, tj AUG 1 5 LGgD. 6 The WSDOT accident history for 1994 through 1996 indicated that of the 13 reported accidents at 15' Street, 3 were left -turn collisions, 4 were rear -end, 2 were entering at an angle, 2 were right -turn, one was a fixed object, and one a pedestrian accident. Of the 21 reported accidents at 100' Avenue, 10 were rear -end, 4 were entering at an angle, 3 were driveway -related, one was a right -turn, one was a fixed object, one a pedestrian, and one a bicycle accident. Of the 14 reported accidents on SR 104 in the vicinity of the site, 8 were driveway -related, 2 were rear -end, one was a fixed object, one was a head-on, one was a sideswipe, and one noted as "other". The Edmonds accident history for 1997 through mid-2000 indicated that the one accident at 15'b Street was an entering at an angle collision. Of the 21 reported accidents at 101r Avenue, 12 were rear -end, one was entering at an angle, 3 were driveway -related, one was a right -turn, one was a left -turn, one was a sideswipe, one a pedestrian, and one a car fire. Of the 13 reported. accidents on SR 104 in the vicinity of the site, 7 were driveway -related, one was a rear -end, one was a fixed object, 2 were sideswipe, one entering at an angle, and one was a bicycle accident. By the description given, none of the accidents appeared to occur at any of the site accesses. All of the driveway accidents appeared to occur at one of the McDonald's driveways or at driveways east of the site. Request: Identify if the proposed accesses meet the sight distance requirements for a design speed of 40 mph. Response: The entering sight distance along SR-104 at the two site accesses was measured to determine adequacy. Entering sight distance is the ability of the motorist on the stop controlled leg of the intersection to see oncoming traffic from either the driver's left or right from an adequate distance to allow the driver.to either turn left or right, or cross an intersection safely. The entering sight distance is directly related to the speed on the main roadway and the roadway geometrics and presence of obstructions. A raised landscaped median along SR-104 creates some sight restrictions to the northwest, and landscaping encroaching into the sidewalk area, along with a horizontal curve, create sight distance restrictions to the southeast of the driveways. The posted speed is 35 mph. The entering sight distance measured at. the site accesses along SR- 104 was as follows (measurements assume some. trimming back of an existing hedge along the highway frontage to the southeast of the site): SR-104/Northerly Access Entering Sight Distance Southeast Approx. 555, Northwest Not Applicable* SR-104/Southerly (Existing) Access Approx. 410' Approx. 475' 7 AUG i 5 �COJ T. * - Access limited to right -turns only, so sight distance to the northwest is irrelevant. Requirements for entering sight distance can be found in both the AASHTO - Geometric Design of Highways and Streets book and the WSDOT Design Manual. WSDOT and AASHTO requirements differ somewhat in their requirements. For a 40-mph design speed, the required AASHTO entering sight distance is approximately 575 feet. The WSDOT sight distance requirement for this same speed is 680 feet. Based on the field measurements, neither the proposed right only access nor the existing access meet WSDOT or AASHTO requirements, although the right only access is just shy of meeting AASHTO requirements. Some additional sight distance could be achieved to the northwest if the bushes in the center median to the northwest of 102' Place are removed. Extensive trimming of the tree buffer on the backside of the QVC building could also provide additional sight distance along the, horizontal curve. to the southeast. The accident data provided by the Edmonds Police Department does not indicate any accident activity at the existing accesses along the site frontage since 1997. (Other accidents were reported in the vicinity, but the accident description implicates other driveway locations, i.e., .McDonald's.) This lack of accident history implies that users of these accesses do not appear to be encountering difficulty in exiting these driveways. As state above, additional sight distance could be achieved by removing landscaping either from the raised island or from behind the sidewalk. While this action would be advantageous from an engineering standpoint, it would not be desirable from a landscaping/aesthetic standpoint, and therefore a balance between these two should be considered. Some trimming back of vegetation that has grown over time is. acceptable, however, the removal of multiple trees and bushes may not be desirable. While the site accesses do not meet current WSDOT or AASHTO entering sight distance requirements, full stopping sight distance is available at both accesses, which would allow motorists onSR-104 to stop in time in the event that a driver pulled out from one of these accesses. The southeasterly access currently exists and is located such that the sight distance to a driver's left or right is fairly well balanced, plus accident history at this access is negligible. The right only access is just shy of meeting AASHTO entering sight distance and no accident activity has been reported in .this vicinity. Since no other reasonable alternatives exist for access to this site without impacting existing businesses and/or landscaping, we would not recommend any changes to the access locations. Any landscaping for .this project should be low vegetation, or located far enough bcic, `n° from the sidewalk so as not to create any sight distance obstruction. The landscape �� , 5�;1 architect's plan has shown 21" laurel and 2" caliper maples to be planted behind th sidewalk. The laurel is low enough that it will not create an obstruction. The brae lfea r ; P 6 . of the maples should be cleared up to six feet in height so as not to create an obstruction. 8 CONCLUSIONS As previously concluded, the project will have little impact on the adjacent street system. The site accesses are nonconforming to current standards, however they were installed prior to the adoption of the access control standards. The redevelopment of the site would eliminate one of the nonconforming accesses and therefore bring the site closer to compliance. Of the two remaining accesses; one also serves the adjacent commercial development and must remain as part of an access easement. The right only access would have limited activity and both driveways appear to have had negligible accident history is the past. Since the northerly driveway is restricted to right -turns only, it would have little impact on the operation of the mainline traffic. Because of these reasons, the accesses as proposed should be allowed as nonconforming connections. Our previous suggestion of removing a portion of the raised center island present along Edmonds Way and extending the two-way left -turn lane to provide more storage space for the main access is still applicable. We would further recommend that the City request more diligent maintenance of the hedge and planting areas behind the sidewalk to the southeast of the site in order to enhance the entering sight distance at the accesses. we trust that the above additional information will allow the City of Edmonds Staff to complete their review of the project. If you, or any of the City Staff, should have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Geri Reinart, P.E. David I. Hamlin and Associates Attachments F a::-'c;' ar_-r av'"- AUG 1 5 201,13 AUG 1 5 EXISTING PIVI PEAK HOUR VOLUMES PLA,. DAVID I. HAMLIN 4 A55CCLATE5 TACO BELL/PIZZA HUT PA& EDMOND5, WA. AU 5 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT TRIPS 0AVID I. HAMLIN 4 A550CIIA17ES TACO BELL/PIZZA HUT EDMONDS, WA. Auu PLL,ES i PT. NG CUT p,,k 207 ■ ■ ■ N 89'47'O9r W 181.81 : ■ ■ ■ da/m ant im JL- - — 4 &Ah Ihk teio■ — — — — — — — — — — — . — — — - \ —'t — — — — — — — — \ REIK DaSrG UR9 — — UMP EE SH — R AIL; — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ♦' \ TACO BELL sm t RAMP \G \ V o .•,, \ \ RAMP O MENU 9GN \ NEW CURB CUi DO NOT ENIEN 9CN c, AC. PWNG REMOVE ElQVG At PAWN DOILIDED CONC CURET a f t. rcti,, +:' ,tea (r:•_-• \ AUG i 5 2CNi ��at��t•��4 `t��r'vi :i v0 HCS-Signals 3 lb File:X100EDWAY Page 1 Inter: SR-104/100TH AVE. Analyst: GR Date: 8/2/00 E/W St: SR-104 P L T R HCS: Signals Release 3.1b City/St: EDMONDS Proj #: Period: PM PEAK N/S St: 100TH AVE. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY IWestbound Northbound L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 LGConfig L TR Volume 50 550 137 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 10 1 2 0 L TR 83 682 188 12.0 12.0 10 1 2 0 L TR 241 466 86 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 170 294 35 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A A Thru A Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 7.0 1.0 32.0 18.0 4.0 19.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 120 1805 0.55 0.067 52.9 D TR 1059 3474 0.84 0.305 41.5 D 42.3 D Westbound L 206 1805 0.42 0.114 44.6 D TR 1220 3463 0.73 0.352 32.2 C 33.3 C Northbound L 447 1805 0.61 0.248 37.5 D TR 898 3491 0.69 0.257 37.6 D 37.6 Dtitae�< Southbound AUG 1 5 cCG3 L 309 1805 0.60 0.171 43.4 . D PL1 4", l `.: �,�• TR 636 3517 0.56 0.181 40.4 D 41.4 D Intersection Delay.= 38.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-bignals 3.1b Fi1e:D100EDWAY Page 1 Inter: SR-104/100TH AVE. Analyst: GR Date: 8/2/00 E/W St: SR-104 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eas L T. HCS: Signals Release 3.1b City/St: EDMONDS Proj #:- Period: PM PEAK W/PROJECT N/S St: 100TH AVE. _SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound R L T R L T R 1 2 0 L TR 50 551 138 12.0 12.0 10 1 2 0 L TR 83 684 188 12.0 12.0 10. L T R 1 2 0 1 2 0 L TR L TR 244 466 86 171 295 35 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A A Thru A Right A A Right A Peds Peds NB Right. EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 7.0 1.0 32.0 18.0 4.0 19.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c. g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 120 1805 0.55 0.067 52.9 D TR 1058 3473 0.84 0.305 41.7 D 42.5 D Westbound L 206 1805 0.42 0.114 44.6 D TR 1221 3464 0.74 0.352 32.2 C 33.3 C Northbound L 447 1805 0.61 0.248 37.7 D TR 898 3491 0.69 0.257 37.6 D 37.6 Dr! Southbound ., L 309 1805 0.60 0.171 43.5 D AUG" i 5 L �f TR 637 3518 0.56 0.181 40.4 D 41.5 D Intersection Delay = 38.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS-Signals 3 lb File:Xl5edway Pagel HCS: Signals Release 3.1b Inter: SR-104/15TH ST. SW City/St: EDMONDS Analyst: GR Proj #: Date: 8/2/00 Period: PM PEAK E/W St: 15TH ST. SW N/S St: SR-104 No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastb L T SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound _ R I L T R I L T R 0 1 1 LT R 33 38 83. 11.0 11.0 0 1 1 L TR 6 30 11.0 11.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 29 90 897 10 12.0 12.0 0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 20 783 40 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A, Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 6.0 2.0 38.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 356 1584 0.22 0.225 25.6 C 25.8 C R 351 1561 0.26 0.225 25.9 C Westbound L 292 1296 0.02 .0.225 24.2 C TR 383 1701 0.17 0.225 25.2 C 25.1 C Northbound L 271 1805 0.36 0.150 31.4 C TR 1962 3568 0.50 0.550 11.4 B 13.2 B G i 5 C4� Southbound L 135, 1805 0.20 0.075 35.5 D TR 1685 3548 0.67 0.475 17.2 B 17.6 B Intersection Delay = 16.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS-Signals 3.1b File:Dl5edway Page 1 Inter: SR-104/15TH ST. SW Analyst: GR Date: 8/2/00 E/W St: 15TH ST. SW No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol s L T HCS: Signals Release 3.1b City/St: EDMONDS Proj #: Period: PM PEAK W/PROJECT N/S St: SR-104 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound . Northbound _ R I L T R I L T R 0 1 1 LT R 33 38 84 11.0 11.0 0 1 1 0 L TR 6 30 29 11.0 11.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 91 898 10 12.0 12.0 0 L T R 1 2 0 L TR 20 784 40 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 18.0 6.0 2.0 38.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 Cycle Length: 80.0 'secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c. g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound IT 356 1584 0.22 0.225 25.6 C 25.8 C R 351 1561 0.26 0.225 26.0 C Westbound L 292 1296 0.02 0.225, 24.2 C TR 383 1701 0.17 0.225 25.2 C 25.1 C Northbound L 271 1805 0.36 0.150 31.4 C TR 1962 3568 0.50 0.550 11.4 B 13.2 B Southbound L 135 1805 0.20 0.075 35.5 D TR 1685 3548 0.67 0.475 17.2 B 17.6 B AUG 1 5 Intersection Delay = 16.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS J`y`« rW;;:,oT. Sent b9:SRS Rug-08-00 03=24Pm from 4254857199i1 206 2831293 SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 8, 2000 Lyle Cbrisman City of Edmonds 121 5*AveN Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Taco Bell Site at 10119 Edmonds Way Dear Lyle: Please be advised that 1 have investigated the subject site for the possible use of a biofiltration swale to satisfy the City's stormwater treatment requirements. At this time it appears that the landscaped areas are too snlA to provide for both landscaping and a biofiltration swale. After talking with you and Don Fiene on the phone, Z have concluded that the City's policy that allows the use of a Stormceptor system is the only viable option for this site. The layout shown on the architectural site plan is acceptable from a conceptual standpoint. Due to the existing slope of the site and the conf guration of the existing storm drain system into which we will connect, the detention and treatment will likely be reversed from the configuration shown on the plan. After the City is.sues prelittaimary approval, the specific layout and system details will be designed. Sincerely, David C. Dougherty, P.E. 310 • 208th S.E. Bothell, Washington 99012 (208) 481.9"T Page 2i 2 Bona - M.- ME =T 3'A t. Pr` 3*,:.719 T-M 71 I R 41 "EA 2,454' 4 9' 6, 9 3 il T: OM DAH. 5� P.Al" 2 t' UA P 1C H 15 OAH 6CA 4F WIN 70 Arg 'p 11 rij. •23 kj; f 2, C; k-1 As f a.4l: 1* 3S C, glut available upowT q 1:z'o'um e Ife fl. Big All sign sve famled pan #P Dr PROS ............ we jar r� veT A Report Prepared For: Olympic Foods of Washington c/o LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 260 Seattle, Washington 98109 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT EDMONDS TACO BELL 10119 EDMONDS WAY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 7, 2001 gTpEET FILE p�N E. NFly WASyy�` 19730 O � FJ, CISTEF% N A l EN6 EXPIRES 8/13/ oL Camp Dresser & McKee 11811 N.E.1st Street, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/453-8383 CDM Project No. 29887-16143001a -2 MAR — £, n CDM c P &mrK. im Section 1.0 � Introduction 1.1 General This report summarizes the results of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.'s (CDM) geotechnical engineering evaluation of the site of a planned Taco Bell restaurant in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located at 10119 Edmonds Way (Vicinity Map, Figure 1). It was previously occupied service stations operated by Gull Industries, Inc. (Gull) until 1988 then by Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. (Texaco) until 1993. CDM (formerly as Applied Geotechnology Inc., dba AGI Technologies) provided geotechnical and environmental engineering services to Gull around the time they sold the site to Texaco. Mr. Mike Baily of LDG Architects authorized our services for this geotechnical engineering evaluation on January 19, 2001. 1.2 Project Description P Our understanding of the project was developed through discussions with Mr. Baily and review of project plans dated November 12, 2000. Development of the Taco Bell includes construction of an approximately 29- by 58-foot, single -story restaurant building and associated parking and drive through paved areas. The building plans call for a concrete slab -on -grade floor with deepened perimeter and interior shear wall support footings. The project includes construction of a below grade 95-foot by 42-inch diameter CMP detention structure. The key geotechnical issues are related to historical excavations on the property to install and abandon underground gasoline storage tanks. Relatively good records exist regarding locations of the former tanks and associated fuel and vent lines. However, backfilling of the abandoned tank excavations was not performed under engineering compaction control. 11 I CDM cp D.. & m.K. tom. ', Q:-JENO=\Edmonds Tam Seld= a 1 1 1 I 1.3 Background We performed an assessment of potential subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at the site for Gull in 1987 prior to sale of the property to Texaco (AGI,1987). Gull had performed site testing and asked us to review the data, make a site visit to observe general conditions in the area, and review other relevant information Gull provided. The testing consisted of tank integrity testing of five underground storage tanks, soil test borings, and analytical laboratory testing. All tanks and lines. tested tight, except for one vent line, which was repaired. Seven test borings to a maximum depth of 25 feet were performed on August 27,1987 and composite soil samples were obtained from depths of 6 feet,10 feet, and 14 feet. All soil samples were classified as sand and tested for petroleum hydrocarbons. Relatively low levels of contamination were found in subsurface soils commensurate with normal historical operations. No free product or other indication that would suggest movement of contamination to the groundwater table was recorded. We monitored tank removal and soil cleanup activities for Gull in May 1988 following sale of the site to Texaco (AGI,1989). Texaco's contractor removed the underground storage tanks and delivery lines, removed and disposed approximately 126 cubic yards of soil that we determined to have petroleum hydrocarbon levels above then current cleanup standards, and installed new underground storage tanks. Our observations and monitoring during tank removal confirmed that hydrocarbon contamination was limited as predicted in the initial assessment. The majority of the observed soil contamination was near the tank fills and was probably caused by periodic overfill spillage. A small zone of contamination was also observed beneath the vent lines. Contaminated soil was removed by excavation and treated off site. We concluded that the site had been adequately cleaned up to meet state standards. 1 We noted that the new tanks were backfilled with pea gravel and the excavated areas outside the new tank area were backfilled with onsite clean sand generated during the ' tank removal activities. To the best of our knowledge, Texaco did not require or request compaction testing of the backfill. Texaco decommissioned and removed the underground storage tank system in 1993 (Groundwater Technology, Inc.,1994). Groundwater Technology, Inc. observed the removal and performed analytical testing of soil samples. Their closure report notes that the tanks, service islands, and vent lines were removed. Soil samples were tested from the excavated materials and from the sides of the excavations. While some indications of slight contamination were noted, only two samples contained fuel hydrocarbons at levels detectable in the laboratory. These test results were below the applicable cleanup levels. No compaction testing of backfill was reported by Groundwater Technology. Inc. CDM cp nwa & mcYce i. 2 Edmonds Taw Bad.doc 1.4 Scope of Work The purposes of our geotechnical engineering evaluation were to review subsurface soil and groundwater data acquired in the above described studies, perform engineering analysis, and provide this written report addressing geotechnical issues related to the planned design and construction. We provide recommendations herein for: ■ Site preparation and grading ■ Utility installation ■ Spread footing foundations ■ Slab -on -grade floors ■ Asphalt pavement CDM camp Dre.0 & McKee Inc. 3 Edmonds Taco Bel.doc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Section 2.0 Site Conditions 2.1 Surface The planned Edmonds Taco Bell site is located on the north side of Edmonds Way (State Route 104) west of its intersection with 100th Avenue West (Figure 1). A cemetery bounds the site to the north, a commercial building to the east, and Edmonds Way to the southeast. The ground surface is relatively level, sloping gently down toward the highway. The site was formerly occupied by a service station consisting of a cashier's booth and four fuel pump islands covered by a canopy (Site Plan, Figure 2). Fuel was stored on the site in underground storage tanks located within the area noted on Figure 2 as the approximate extent of tank excavations. The tanks in service prior to 1988 were located in the northern portion of this area and the tanks in service from 1988 to 1993 were located in the southern portion. Underground piping ran from the tanks to the fuel pump islands and to vents located northeast of the cashier's booth at about the locations shown on Figure 2. The known underground fuel tanks and piping, pump islands, canopy, and cashier's booth have been decommissioned and removed from the site. The ground surface is currently asphalt paved in areas, bare gravel in other areas, and a limited former landscaped area. 2.2 Subsurface Our understanding of subsurface conditions is based on the seven test borings drilled in 1987 to a depth of 25 feet, observations made by Groundwater Technology, Inc and AGI during tank removal, and published geological maps. The site is generally underlain by sands and gravels deposited by receding glaciers (recessional outwash). The upper 4 to 5 feet is a brown gravelly to silty sand. It is underlain by a poorly -graded, fine to medium gray sand to the maximum depth explored. These soils are medium dense to dense. Groundwater was not encountered in borings which were drilled to maximum depths of 25 feet. We believe that there is a groundwater table at greater depth in the recessional outwash. The inferred direction of groundwater flow is toward the northwest based on local topography. I CDM camp Dmou & mcKw hic. Eamonft raw Betl.eoc 2.3 Backfill Various excavations have been made for the installation and removal of underground storage tanks and piping and for the canopy and cashier's booth foundations. Within the area noted on Figure 2 as the approximate extent of tank excavations, the depth of excavation was between 8 feet to the north and 14 feet to the south. Elsewhere, excavations were probably limited to the upper few feet. These excavations were backfilled with a variety of materials including the native on - site soils, pea gravel tank backfill, and imported fill (most likely pit run). To. our knowledge, none of this backfill was placed and compacted under engineering control. Therefore, we anticipate that the backfill is of highly variable density from loose to medium dense. CM Camp Drama & McKee Inc. 5 Edmonds Taco Beldoc Section 3.0 Discussion and Conclusions 3.1 Discussion Based on the results of this study, we believe the planned Edmonds Taco Bell can be constructed generally as planned providing the recommendations in this report are implemented. With the possible exception of the southeast corner of the proposed building; historical records indicate the planned structure will not overlie areas of relatively deep fill placed without engineering control. Shallow excavations made for the installation and removal of piping and foundations underlie parts of the structure. These areas can be addressed during construction by overexcavation and replacement with structural fill as discussed in Section 3.2. Historical records suggest that all tanks, piping, and foundations have been removed. However, it is not unusual to find other tanks, lines, or foundations on former service station sites. We judge that the chance of finding waste oil or heating oil tanks is very low since there is no record of an occupied structure on the site. If other tanks, pipes, or foundations are encountered during construction, they should be removed and the excavations properly backfilled as discussed in Section 3.2. Historical records also indicate that all identified soil contamination was removed. It is not uncommon to find other, isolated areas of soil contaminated with hydrocarbons on former service station sites. The contractor should be informed of this possibility and you should be prepared to take timely action in order to not delay construction. If such soils are encountered, we anticipate they will be localized and can be relatively easily removed and properly disposed or treated. ' This remainder of this section provides specific conclusions and recommendations regarding earthwork, foundations, utilities, and paving. 3.2 Earthwork Site preparation and grading will begin with removal and disposal of remaining ' asphalt paving and concrete sidewalks and curbs. We expect vegetation removal and. topsoil stripping will be limited in volume and confined to existing landscape areas. It is our opinion that required excavations into the recessional outwash sands and gravels or backfill can be accomplished with conventional earthwork equipment. 1 � 1 Earth materials obtained from onsite excavations will be generally suitable for use as structural fill material if they can be properly moisture -conditioned and compacted. Due to the silt content in the upper sand and poor grading of the deeper sand, these soils should be considered moderately moisture sensitive. Portions of the existing backfill may also be moisture sensitive. Therefore, onsite fill material may be difficult to compact during periods of wet weather — typically between October and May. CDM cmpsiim 6 Edmonds Taco Beldoc Imported fill material should be clean pit run consisting of clean, free -draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). ' All fill placed on the site should consist of on -site or imported earth fill material moisture -conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture.content, placed in level lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and compacted to the specified percent relative compaction to produce a firm and unyielding surface. Optimum moisture content is defined as the moisture content (percent by dry weight) corresponding to the maximum dry density of the same material as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. ' Structural fill should be used to establish grade beneath structural elements such as spread footings, floor slabs, and pavements. It should be comprised of on -site or imported fill material compacted to the following minimum relative percent �i compaction: ■ Foundations and Floor Slabs: 95 Percent ■ Pavement Subgrades: 95 Percent (upper 2 feet), 90 Percent (below 2 feet) ' ■ Landscape Areas: 85 Percent Relative percent compaction is the required in -place dry density of the material, expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry density of the same material as determined in the laboratory by ASTM Test Method D1557 (Modified Proctor). 3.3 Utilities Utility work will likely involve only shallow excavations (i.e., less than 4 feet bgs) with the exception of the planned detention structure. All utility line excavations, !, particularly beneath structures and pavements, should be backfilled with structural fill to the above recommended relative percent compaction. The detention structures should be bedded in pea gravel or clean crushed rock to the spring line of the pipe, or the depth where the required compaction criteria for structural fill can be met and tested, whichever is shallower. 3.4 Foundations The deepened slab spread footing foundations should bear on either undisturbed native recessional outwash sand and gravel or structural fill. To achieve this, overexcavation will be required in areas where existing backfill is encountered below footing subgrade. The depth of overexcavation can generally be limited to 2 feet 1 below footing subgrade, extending beyond the footing a distance equal to the depth of the excavation below planned subgrade elevation. The consistency of existing backfill should be field verified by the geotechnical engineer to confirm the required depth of ' overexcavation. The geotechnical engineer should also verify foundation bearing before placing concrete for the slab and foundation system. CDM Camp Drewer & McKee hw- 7 Edmonds ram Bea.doc The following design criteria apply to the deepened slab spread footing foundations: ■ Bearing Material: Undisturbed native sands and gravels or structural fill ■ Minimum Footing Depth of Embedment: 24 inches ■ Minimum Footing Lateral Dimension: 12 inches ■ Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure: 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) Note: Allowable soil bearing pressures are for all dead and live loads and may be increased by one-third for temporary short-term wind and seismic loads. ■ Lateral Load Resistance: — Passive Resistance: 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) equivalent fluid weight — Coefficient of Friction: 0.4 Note: The passive resistance is based on the assumption that all footing backfill has been placed and compacted as recommended above. The upper 1-foot of soil should be neglected in design computations unless protected by pavement or a slab -on -grade. Both values include factors of safety of approximately 2. ■ Settlement: Total less than 0.5 inch; Differential less than 0.5 inch over 50 feet 3.5 Concrete Slab -On -Grade Floors The concrete slab -on -grade floor system should be supported on either undisturbed native soils or structural fill as described above for the deepened slab spread footings. In general, overexcavation of existing fill beneath the floor slab can be limited to 1 foot; however, the same recommendations for the geotechnical engineer to field observe and verify overexcavation and bearing apply. We recommend that the slab -on -grade be protected from moisture by a capillary break and vapor barrier system. The capillary break should consist of a minimum of 4 inches of free -draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay -sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4-inch mesh sieve. A reinforced plastic vapor barrier should be placed beneath the concrete floor slab. A layer of sand, approximately 2 inches thick, may be placed over the vapor barrier membrane to protect it from damage, to act as an aid in curing of the concrete slab, and also to help prevent cement paste bleeding down into the underlying capillary break. CDM cB pD.. & wK. i . Edmonds Tom Befl.doc s 3.6 Asphalt Pavement We recommend that any existing backfill beneath pavement areas be overexcavated to a minimum depth of 1 foot below pavement subgrade. The entire subgrade should then be proof -rolled with a heavy, rubber -tired vehicle such as a loaded dump truck or a steel drum vibratory roller under the observation of the geotechnical engineer to ' identify possible areas of weak subgrade. Such areas may require some additional overexcavation. All overexcavated areas should be backfilled with structural fill. The following pavement design recommendations were developed using the American Association of State and Highway Transportation Official (AASHTO) method for flexible pavement design. We also assumed existing backfill is overexcavated and the subgrade surface is compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. ' Our pavement section calculations are based on the following: ■ Annual maintenance such as sealing crack in the pavement. ■ Design pavement life of 20 years. ■ Maximum anticipated truck and automobile loads of type H2O (8 kips front axle and 32 kips rear axle) and 2 kips per axle, respectively. ■ Adequate drainage of surface water to catch basins. We recommend that the pavement section consist of either a layer of 4 inches of ' Crushed Rock Base (CRB) or 4 inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material placed on a subgrade prepared as described above. Asphalt Concrete Pavement (AC) should overlay the CRB or ATB and should be a minimum or 3-inches thick in traffic areas and 2-inches thick in parking areas. 3.7 Geotechnical Engineer We recommend that you retain CDM as the geotechnical engineer to observe and test the geotechnical aspects of construction. At a minimum, this would include our verification of the required depth of overexcavation, foundation bearing capacity, and concrete slab -on -grade bearing. Our presence will also allow us to compare the actual conditions encountered with those expected by this investigation, and to modify our recommendations, if necessary. In the remote event that hydrocarbon -contaminated soil is encountered; we can assist with its identification, removal, and proper disposal. Our intent is to be present onsite on a part-time basis to document that the work conforms to the geotechnical aspects of this report and the plans and specifications. Our daily field reports and final report form an important record of construction. CDM camp Drewer & McKee h= Edmonds Tam Be.doc Section i n 4.0 Limitations and Additional Services This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Olympic Foods of Washington and its consultants and contractors for this project only. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and our experience and engineering judgment. CDM cannot be held ' responsible for the interpretation by others of the data contained here. Our services have been performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. You should be aware that subsurface conditions may vary between exploration locations and with time, and unanticipated conditions can and often do occur. If differing conditions are exposed during construction or the design is modified, we should be retained to reevaluate our recommendations and provide a written confirmation or modification, as necessary. We cannot be responsible for the applicability of our recommendations if not afforded this opportunity. To allow for these eventualities, a contingency should be provided in both your construction 11, �L� budget and schedule. Because of the judgment required to distinguish unsuitable foundation bearing material, we should be retained to provide construction -monitoring services during the geotechnical phases of construction. This monitoring will allow us to verify subsurface conditions are as expected, and to document the results of the construction. CDM C np D.,= & McKw Im 10 Edmonds Tam BOA= Section 5.0 Ref erences Applied Geotechnology Inc.1987. Hydrocarbon Contamination Assessment, Mobil Service Station (#276),10119 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, Washington, September 21,1987, Project No.15,256.002. Applied Geotechnology Inc. 1989. Tank Removal Monitoring Services, Edmonds Texaco Station (Former Gull Station #276), 10119 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, Washington, June 13, 1989, Project No.15,256.002. Groundwater Technology, Inc. 1994. Report of Underground Storage Tank Closure, Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc., 10119 Edmonds Way,. Edmonds, Washington, February 18, 1994, Project No. 020603135. CIN Camp D & McKee Inc. 11 Edmonds Taw BeO.Coc C, Contents Section1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................1 1.1 General............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description........................................................................................................1 1.3 Background.................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Scope of Work................................................................................................................ 3 Section2.0 Site Conditions.................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Surface.............................................................................................................................4 2.2 Subsurface.................................................................................................................:.....4 2.3 Backfill .............................................................................................................................5 Section3.0 Discussion and Conclusions............................................................................ 6 3.1 Discussion.......................................................................................................................6 3.2 Earthwork.......................................................................................................................6 3.3 Utilities............................................................................................................................ 7 3.4 Foundations....................................................................................................................7 Slab Floors 8 3.5 Concrete -On -Grade ................................................................................... 3.6 Asphalt Pavement.................................................................................I........................ 9 3.7 Geotechnical Engineer.................................................................................................. 9 Section 4.0 Limitations and Additional Services............................................................10 Section5.0 References..........................................................................................................11 Distribution Figures CDM c.P nm& in. I List of Figures Figure 1- Vicinity Map Figure 2 - Site Plan CDM C=p Dm« & McKft h H Distribution 3 Copies LDG Architects 1319 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 260 Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Mike Baily 1 Copy Olympic Foods of Washington 9709 Third Avenue, Suite 303 Seattle, Washington 98115 Attention: Richard Ramsey, President Quality Assurance / Technical Review by: Jz Ui V, , - Richard W. Smith, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer CDM cam D & i. D-t QN—JENDOWEdmrids Two BeOAoc Figures CIN Camp Dm a & McKee Inc. F-I C:\-JENDoca*dmonda Taw Betl.doc EDMONDS TACO BELL EDMONDS, WASHINGTON CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Figure No. 1 VICINITY MAP FORMER CASHIERS BOOTH FORMER VENT AND PLANNED /� I REMOTE FILL LINES TACO BELL C\" \ / _ APPROXIMATE EXTENT \ OF TANK EXCAVATIONS \v FORMER FUEL LINES FORMER PUMP ISLANDS FORMER CANOPY \ PROPERTY LINE • EDMONDS TACO BELL EDMONDS, WASHINGTON CDN Camp Dresser & McKee Figure No. 2 SITE PLAN Of EDV tP Purpose of Checklist: CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED DEC 2 0` 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES cTR. CITY OF EDMONDS The Stale Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EiS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EiS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EiS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. in most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. if you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations.. such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." iN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Taco Bell 2. Name of applicant: Ed Linardi&I.dg Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1319 Dexter Ave 1V, suite 260 ,Seattle, [f A 98109 Page 1 of 22 4. Date checklist prepared: 5.12.2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Summer 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. Page 2 of 22 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Architectural Design Board Approval, SEPA, Conditional Use Permit, Building Permit, Occupancy Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. A one story building housing fast food restaurant with a drive up window. The building is, 1,623 sf with 10 parking stalls. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 10119 Edmonds Way Page 3 of 22 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: h. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandgrm,el d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Page 4 of 22 e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Balance cut and fill f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could occur during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: There will be an erosion control plan submitted as part of our building permit set. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and vechicle emissions during construction, Vehicle emission following completion of the project. Page 5 of 22 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. S.R. 104 Edmonds Waw C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: There are no measures proposed at this time to mitigate automobile emissions, due to the minimal emission. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. Page 6 of 22 (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. Page 7 of 22 (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. New storm water system ,lowing to underground detention system then to composed vault prior to discharging to citys storm system (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, possibility exists though if any sewer pipes break. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The proposed system will reduce ans control water runoff. Page 8 of 22 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be remove and new landcaping will be installed per City of Edmonds Zoning Code. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. Page 9 of 22 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attached ladscape plan. 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows,sparrows and robins mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. Page 10 of 22 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas for heating and cooking, electricity for lighting and cooling. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation of the roof, walls and slab as required per energy code. Page 11 of 22 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. No. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic along Edmonds Way. Page 12 of 22 (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction between 7: 00 a. in. and 6: 00 p.m., traffic noise and usage of facility at peak hours. (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant, To the north is cemetery, to the east is shopping center and to the south is Edmonds Way b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. Page 13 of 22 C. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? BN f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Bisiness. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? No. Page 14 of 22 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed building is a one story, similar in design as the adjacent buildings. Page 15 of 22 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? 22' Page 16 of 22 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Modulation of the building fagade. Building colors that will blend with the neighborhood and extensive landscaping. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot and walkway lighting for night accessibility. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. The propose lights will have shields so that no light will spill over to adjacent proporties. C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. Page 17 of 22 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Shielded fixtures to restrict spill over to adjacent properties. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Page 18 of 22 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SR 104 Edmonds Way Page 19 of 22 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 10 stalls d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. Page 20 of 22 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 46AMPeak Hour and 31 PM Peak Hour. Total daily trips are 500 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, emergency fire and police protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. Page 21 of 22 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Hook-up to the existing street utilites. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Page 22 of 22 Date Submitted DRAINAGE REPORT (& Grease Trap Sizing) CITY Cor TACO BELL 10119 EDMONDS WAY 1.l� f�' r o 4) BY SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ~` 310 208TH ST. SE BOTHELL 98012 425-481-9687 �4 January 30, 2001 �Vt, D Y�: DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION DRAINAGE DESCRIPTION As a result of a pre -application meeting on March 8, 2000, the enclosed drainage detention calculations were prepared. The site is about 0.35 acres is size and is mostly impervious. In a telephone conversation on August 4, 2000, Don Feine stated that .. detention is required for the 10 and 100-year storms only, predeveloped conditions can be assumed as pervious with a curve number of 85, and treatment could be accomplished using a Stormceptor. The selected Stormceptor is a model STC 900, as it has a treatment flow rate capacity of 0.635 cfs, while the release rate from the restrictor is 0.03 cfs. Currently the site slopes gently to Edmonds Way. Three on -site catch basins collect the site runoff and direct it to a storm drain in the street. No records could be found on the size of that storm drain and it was not field measured due to heavy traffic in the street. However, it was observed to be very deep, so all on -site catch basins are draining to it by gravity. In any case, the proposed storm drain system will discharge to one of the on -site catch basins, so it is not necessary to determine the pipe depth in the street. The only off - site area draining onto the site is to the east. This area is diverted by a curb and asphalt berm to the existing storm drain system downstream of the detention. The area to the north drains parallel to the site; however, if any of that area does drain to the site, it is now (and will be in the future) collected in an existing catch basin in the northwest corner of the site. As no known problems exist in the downstream system in Edmonds Way, no downstream analysis was prepared. No data could be found on the pipe, however, the peak flows will be less than the existing flows; so the impacts of the project on the existing storm drain system will be to reduce the peak flows slightly. DETENTION DESIGN tV� 299.06 Its dy6a 34r k <o0 1.35.2.t5 0' SEWER EA cl4ENT REC. }191:340 ' "n ` , �J Po«er wall •t`nGp is 1.21 i <1 1, A34 c`� R 98.25 oyw r ede ) Nev. = 299.72 rqf goo. !rt \ �• nt EL E55 EASDAL14T a y �4}d \ 1 dy\ ee.e 298.93 i I �" c 0 ailt9n� P�tj nchar M1 `tdgt aeon. ooHna_ no'�� N 89'47'08' W 161.81�r. /-chew ;rY -w•tc« y.y�y - - - m.n.•Na .0a_ c9=.6__ IN NO Ole-ro ro �_a 12 Oj f4net 'o OSl !L "Ea of oam �\ �\ Q.` �!J ` catch DPsin �1 - - fend ft 0.68 N. - T_ JN 9 p �N� �' - - - - �j J f NE oim e,o, \ 4 .�9.0 --22 ^' c� IM emro - SS _ g • Z1�.t E 8AN0�b.c' F $'! Sa 24 'd %' 1 t �i 301.07t.97 /- 302.8 02.79- c ♦ E''- f ' `.r . r f 1� '�_../� fs� _�f 03.14 1 1 0202 298.89 D + 301.05 302.4 ~ )1 ss \ \ \ \ \ O i ` 1 TAC6 BELL \ 2� J' `\ \� ♦ lull Nte \ 'rr �.67 ` I \ AyJ99.9J }:JZ f I 1 303.35 \ . \ \\ ` \ ✓ CONC 9DEWMR // J' I I. . \ s. ss 1a -\,\ ,\ I t !}Ot.52 NXI, !/r (102,17 3 2.64 302.80 Y 300.25 \•} sr �\ W ? 1 off Pest / 1 n \\ fs c �\ \d'��\ \ \ /J . 3oz.,2 2.7o . 30J.3, 0' `�\ : it 1 .\ 'vtt \00 ♦ 302.21 _� /✓ - . 303.41 ♦ V` 298.99 \ ,\ \\ \ 300. 19 ♦ 3 \ oz.o3� \ Ja 01.83 �e�302.43 \\\ ss c �\ \ ` 1, 301.9 l V A \ $ O 1 � 2.24 303 7'� f301 fit I > _ O ar% 41, \,\ �•; \ I 4 1 � a \ qa \\ EX3j CB 4-1 -c,-- I TE=301.61 \ ` ! edge a n. Poo:nq --� - �702.7i ^E IE=295> OUT) ` \ ,\ / .,t \ 3039 \ - 4 aon ar« •.,.., Nf1 I� - J1L !'�_ _ 30}. 0 �\0 Ne. - 301.37 ) ' Ole . _ ,302.97 - - 8) 1 \ of 30 .77 •\ \\\ / \ \\ t L}o2� v n,.H /iignl tole catch basin NS o JO,. a>{ Nev. = 30314 1 y 302.08 t ev - }01.35 1 7 1`•_, 302.79 0 •46 /� r can�cn aavn N4 \30211M. ON TOP IIP.E \ L Y}02.8 302.26 MVOPANT-CENTER CAP \ all at Ci,t. rabbit ELEV ,,305.16 FEET M \�\ \ 303 9 \ . 302.08 Z ,i \ ♦ 1 O elgn Past 17 301 36 \\ \ \ ♦ ♦ 1 ;S ��+OS ,,,j 3OA.IA,, //J/ "V/1 :07.90 L i r .: �•e v- � i 0 t9S !�-Y'•e c� = S 4--s �p C T&- V Q t I +o r LA. 04 v-0�— ��U L�%r-� d. Q t0 p P c! t "'4- tCY'-r C-tlO%A, 1. LV�olu f k�vvmt/Zo��, 0 v-0\k0T 4.1 S v `Ma p c. 9 4-1 r-a- J r 0 v v! i ro -t —�- rCS � Jdp %t le rt,tto'C'.cf`�t3S g�ro� �BSO�, �� �3 �e- . li t � t v 3 i� r.4 o� '°' 1 S 3 D OC 1, b tA, 4c.. m// 0.35"ac t?'c( rr 00.4�- c�,e-4 e O arc(, C,DVA-ic-.' �' VG' G t w 4 ( V c. l v 4 / 7Z, l rr l 00 �c VLIVI s I f ��� a{-Fc�c�•�.� w���V Doti-.�.s a v � Ev i) `f v \P G C` A.5 .��,� "i IA S �0 \r-k O �f' �o G O v- Ir ,mac ' e to f - u. r o v- �J _ Co N C-c o v- 'lp J 57 4• - 1 Utn v� k� v l Q Z.. q r •, V&.bFCI V� v 'ee Orr�'�`cW5 Lowe \r Opp r �s¢ ��-- Trc4.s�zz. Ctb z Jgliirc- b ¢ L _7` -F ffie JJ r � Jo- r 10/ 9/00 Site Development Services page 1 SR-104 Taco Bell - ----------------------- BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: al NAME: 10 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION....: 2.10 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: 85.00 TIME OF CONC.....: 47.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres CN..... 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 177.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.40 s:0.0240 PEAK RATE: 0.03 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: a2 NAME: 100 Year Predeveloped SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA PRECIPITATION....: 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.35 Acres TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN....: TIME OF CONC.....: 47.66 min IMPERVIOUS AREA ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA..: 0.00 Acres CN..... 98.00 TcReach - Sheet L: 177.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.40 s:0.0240 PEAK RATE: 0.07 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN ID: cl SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA........ RAINFALL TYPE....: PRECIPITATION....: TIME INTERVAL....: TIME OF CONC.....: ABSTRACTION COEFF: NAME: 10 Year p�,-fdeveloped 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA 2.10 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres 10.00 min CN...:: 86.00 6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.20 AREA..: 0.23 Acres CN..... 98.00 PEAK RATE: 0.12 cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 10/ 9/00 Site Development.Services page 2 SR-104 Taco Bell ----------- BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: c2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA.......: RAINFALL TYPE....: PRECIPITATION....: TIME INTERVAL....: TIME OF CONC.....: ABSTRACTION COEFF: PEAK RATE: 0.19 C NAME: 100 Year Postdeveloped 0.35 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs TYPElA PERVIOUS AREA 3.00 inches AREA..: 0.12 Acres 10.00 min CN....: 86.00 6.30 min IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.20 AREA..: 0.23 Acres CN..... 98.00 VOL: 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min 10/12/00 Site Development Services page 1 SR-104 Taco Bell ----------------------------- STAGE STORAGE TABLE CUSTOM STORAGE ID No. det2 Description: 42inch Pipe w/ Dead Storage - 7.37G-F o lf-' OtV e- S'T E < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAG < ---- STORAGE----> STAB <---- STORAGE ---- > SWE <---- STORU ---- > (ft)---cf-----Ac-Ft- (ft)---cf-----AC-Ft- (ft)---cf-----AC-Ft- (ft)---cf-----Ac-Ft- 100.00 0.0000 0:0000 101.10 260.25 0.0060 102.20 530.85 0.0122 103.30 679.35 0.0156 100.10 21.450 0.0005 101.20 285.75 0.0066 102.30 552.15 0.0127 103.40 686.30 0.0158 100.20 42.900 0.0010 101.30 311.25 0.0071 102.40 573.45 0.0132 103.50 693.25 0.0159 100.30 64.350 0.0015 101.40 336.75 0.0077 102.50 594.75 0.0137 103.60 700.20 0.0161 100.40 85.800 0.0020 101.50 362.25 0.0083 102.60 607.50 0.0139 103.70 707.15 0.0162 100.50 107.25 0.0025 101.60 387.45 0.0089 102.70 620.25 0.0142 103.80 714.10 0.0164 100.60 132.75 0.0030 101.70 412.65 0.0095 102.80 633.00 0.0145 103.90 721.05 0.0166 100.70 158.25 0.0036 101.80 437.85 0.0101 102.90 645.75 0.0148 104.00 728.00 0.0167 100.80 183.75 0.0042 101.90 463.05 0.0106 103.00 658..50 0.0151 104.00 728.00 0.0167 100.90 209.25 0.0048 102.00 488.25 0.0112 103.10 665.45 0.0153 101.00 234.75 0.0054 102.10 509.55 0.0117 103.20 672.40 0.0154 Zi rc�ovNC1 �7l C� i.[�/ C( Ow4C( ST Oita-j ELEV NET VOL FOR VOL FOR VOL FOR AREA 95LF 90LF _ 100 0 0 0 0 100.5 1.43 135.85 128.7 107.25 101 3.13 297.35 281.7 234.75 101.5 4.83 458.85 434.7 362.25 102 6.51 618.45 585.9 488.25 102.5 7.93 753.35 713.7 594.75 103 8.78 834.1 790.2 658.5 U) el�-e NrLAJ o%-ks 4-r c��•r.af o 5�c��a rr v 'J e, 10/12/00 Site Development.Services page 3 SR-104 Taco Bell LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE <-------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 10 Year Design ............... 0.03 0.12 det2 rstrl 101.76 11 427.52 100 Year Design .............. 0.07 0.19 det2 rstrl 102.96 12 653.72 << ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT DESCRIPTION PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD 10 Year Design 0.03 0.12 det2 rstrl 101.76 0.03 11 , 100 Year Design 0.07 0.19 det2 rstrl 102.96 0.07 12 o ka,Y Technical Manual Page 12 U Stormceptor units provide storage capacities (sediment and oil) from 108 ft' to 1000 ft' (Table 3). Table 3 also indicates the maximum treatment flow rate of the various Stormceptor units. These flow rates indicate the threshold when bypassing begins to occur. At flowrates greater than the maximum treatment flowrate, treatment is still provided in the unit at 80% to 90% of the maximum treatment flowrate (NWRI, 1993). The treatment rate decreases once the unit begins to bypass since the overflow creates a backwater on the outlet pipe (See figure 2, page 6). Table 3 Stormceptor Capacities* Model Maximum Treatment Flowrate (gal/min)* Maximum Treatment Flowrate (ft'/sec)* Orifice Opening (in.) Sediment Capacity (ft') Oil Capacity (gal) Total Holding Capacity (gal) STC 900 285 .635 6 75 280 950 STC 1200 285 6.635 6 110 280 1230 STC 1800 285 0.635 6 195 280 1830 STC 2400 475 1.058 8 180 880 2495 STC 3600 475 1.058 8 345 880 3750 STC 4800 800 1.782 10 465 1025 5020 STC 6000 800 1.782 10 610 1025 6095 STC 7200 1110 2.473 12 725 1100 7415 * approximate, without by-passing CI Stormceptoi° Technical Manual Appendix II STC 900 Precast Concrete Stormceptor® (900 US Gallon Capacity) SEE NOTE #1 STORMCEPTOR COVER AND GRATE ff 32 --� GRADE ADJUSTERS TO SUIT FINISHED GRAD 5 �— 6"0 VENT 8" ... •:... 30" O PIPE A f J. :• I [r VARIABLE 72"o 7" DI A. s i VARIES -------- STORMCEPTOR® � ---- -- - � .-. ::.• :., INSERT I INLET WEIR JOUTLET 18 16s' 60 , ' ORIFICE r PLATE 55" DROP TEE V. INLET PIPE 24" 0 DROP , ' RUBBER :• OUTLET PIPE ' GASKET PER ASTM C 443 • : ' -.� ..:." .: :::' ": . ' ENLARGED OUTLE81 CONNECTION DETAIL SECTION THRU CHAMBER NOTE 1. THE USE OF FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS IS RECOMMENDED AT THE INLET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. THE COVER SHOULD BE POSITIONED OVER THE OUTLET DROP PIPE AND THE VENT PIPE 3. THIS IS A GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING. CONSULT LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS. STC-900 REVISED 6/97 GREASE TRAP SIZING So cJ r c . V� ( V U, �.Pa �nOrcJIr �. t,\. 9 w oe. S �o v") {r O QD o CT� GZ C(�C --A . S C �+ V� U� t l�l� o� tw-c4t5 Lje 9�t �COtJ X Me�ec�tt�Ot� X 5�07, to c Cµ"v-c V, 72- 90 k ( .4-� use- u4; G / V<, j l f- 1,� GREASE INTERCEPTORS SINGLE VAULT SYSTEM Dim.'A' Clear Access Openings Grout Both Sides A = L, + 1 + ��� — 1— A Dim."B' \ - - / Precast Divider 600-6000 Gallon Capacities PLAN VIEW Slot Both Sides OPTIONAL Adjust To Grade A r Dia.andLocking T,htrame and Cover Vent Pipes 3 Places ( 2 Places on 577-GA ) t� r --i I r-'I -n I r--1 r-1 I I I\ - Inspection Tee - INLET —� --�,� Typical i I `� t2• I i —� Z1------Y--------.---�!---------jl-- OUTLET I I T- LJ ' I I Tee or Elbow I "' r" - H I Dim "E" I I I Dim "C" Water Depth I I I I I I 2-6 I I Dim "D" 1'-0 n. Grout All Around Slot Both Sides 2/3 Length 1 1/3 SECTION VIEW AA GALLON CAPACITY 600 750 9 1000 1250 15W 1750. 2000 2500 2750 30 4000 50 6000 UV Co. MODEL No. 577-GA 577-GA 577-GA 48-GA 484-GA 5106-GA '5106-G 612-GA 612-GAt8'- 712-GA 712-GA 818-GA 818-GA "A" 7'-0" 7'-' ' 07-0" 9'-0"DIM 9'-0' ll'-2' 1l'-2' 12'-8" 12'-8' 13'-1' 13-1' 19'-11' 19'-11' DIM 'B" 4'-8" 4'-8'4'-8 5'-0" 5'-8- 5'-8" 6'-8" 6'-8' 8'-0" 8'-0' 9-11' 9'-11" DIM "C" 7'-0" 7'-0- 7'-0" 7'-2' 7'-2" 7'-2' 8'-0' 8'-0" 8'-7' 8'-7' 8-11' 10'-5' DIM "D" S-6" 4'-3' 5'-3' 4'-2' 5'-2" 4'-4' 4'-11' 4'-7" 5'-6' 5'-0' 6'-6' 6'-2" 7--2- DEPTH DIM "E" 3-2" 3-tt' a'-t" 3-t0" a-10 ' a'-0" - a7 '-' '-9' '-9'4'-7wATER DESIGN CRITERIA Unfform Plumbing Code - Appendix H Number Of Meals Waste Flow Retention Storage - CAPACITY Per Peak Hour X Rate X Time X Factor IN GALLONS UTiLJ71 ZAULT (CCIMF4NY '.O. 3OX 588 ?hone (253) 339-3500 NOTES: 1. Concrete: 28 Day Compressive Strength fc = 4500 psi 2. Reber: ASTM A-615 Grade 60 3. Mesh: ASTM A-185 Grade 65 4. Design: ACI-318-89 Building Code ASTM C-857 "Minimum Structural Design Loading For Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures' 5. Loads: H-20 Truck Wheel w/ 30% Impact Per AASHTO 6. Fill w/ Clean Water Prior To "Start -Up' Of System 7. Contractor To Supply and Install All Piping and Sampling Tees 8. GRAY WATER ONLY, Black Water Shall Be Carried By Separate Side Sewer. ..+uourn. Washing= 9807' -,588 lax 1253) 725--201 • ITEMS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. CopyrightO1M 00ldeas Recastm.AllRightsReserved 124 Issue: January,1996 14 City of Edmonds McEI V Dmit No: - I 5 RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PEIWA'f 200#ssue Date: 0V ' _ - A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1011 S P(.On1n� W&-( ENGiN B. Type of Work (be specific): PAVI X) e: ie a�i S -�,e�,r� r?1�wf Tir�h, ? UTIU77C� frol .tip' ILL. f f-6yo�5�Cfi� Contact: vlok" r C. Contractor: Mailing Address: "1 R 3 Phone: szu l7 V Sta is nse #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ ?.(k D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): 0. E. Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ CityProject ❑ EUC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: 14 YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X H. Charge: $ CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO P P IDEMNITY.• Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims. of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. a THE CONTRACTOR IS, RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public .safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is _to be in accordance with City codeso All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday-NOMEXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE T$E PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS 4:�� CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved by: ✓ _ Right-of-way Feer$-?o Time Authorized: Void AfterjW it Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Special Conditions: It ,'.4/1Aiyalitfof &, ,,.Restoration Fee: jNsf,%t� Ord, Total Fee: 'Receipt No: 7,--�e r zqk, Issued by: .+y'".y._ �i !_ _ .. /:: i e�ld,rt vim-- /.n, t "71c .. � .� �"sf♦ UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. INSPECTOR'S I NATURE DATE: For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. NO WORK SHALL, BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. J r Ina. rebor k coo 299.06 1 y64}4 1.354.15 SEWER t•ASELENT REC. a1917340 p r a e (a C•2t S � 5 pie r e�ev. 299.72 (,pt prop- i'tfe fntl, r bor @ CCD - d »/ I i pp.er/IIght ON, t 'S 20• tMCR° EGRESS FAff}FENT �s /6.34 "e'. 298.91 �- 0 °�. 90 an N+or etlgs asph. vpvin9 1 pheln i'o� fene aan. a e � .. � 'P° N 89'4TOB- W 181.8'r • �'' �wr-.ram •298.19 ee ea - - - uie��or ovm ` \\ s ?.�� 300.122\ t. - o3r + c catch basin ,t - - fence ie 0.88 N. - - ' ' J J of !E'vrpPl M. •-ZQ9.0 d+oh 1by •prro n r - - K �.t 6 \ \ .+9 55-�+�ei�•. _ ]5' n,5 a �T 55 g•• �EA` R8Ak0 1E�4f�1�E iIN �POSE� L/�:`/iPIgO Y M9.2a / B.. \mod \ // r �!, •• a. `//r ~ a \ ' $r, `• \� 4" , 301.07 XXX 299.66 646 t \\ Ilk \1 02.02 Y}p2.25 �r 71• 302.4 1 i �P T0 BELL�T �` A r; fruit iree f q j 299.93 \ \\ \ , 300.93 �� \ 2.31 ,0S \ 3D0.1.%1 11 -01.831 02.79cm smw" � �\ �`s,�\ S ♦ \,v // / f. 30 1 in 01.52 3 2.64 $ 30I.80 0 3D0.25 .e}. y 1 •�! '4 ffS aH Peat 1 A . / 302.61 \\\, :0• it tree \ ` 300.72♦ 302.21 �� i . 302J2 �2.70 303.71 303.11 411 Z-2QLU\302.00 \702 0}\ Ot.83 902.43 � Q \ \ \ • 301.9 •r I ' + P. �� iS:• % i . 302.360138 o I n ♦ i� ! o 1 }}}000 307.17 '• 2. i ♦ `aat<h OaSin 2 I 1'�� I / 300.♦ 90 ♦ f �` ,1,1(OU T) \4 ` // / etlgs p n. vaviny _.i ---I102,7i \ ♦ / 302.14 1 rt�- fir. 1 Nev.t- 301.37 - I / Ne . _ ,302.87 EB c .0 I 302.52 • 30 .77 2 po»a /�ignt pope \ \catch basin y3 \� 30t.AX ».'n1 1\302.08 Nn, N- - 301.35 \ a elev, - 303.14 \ \ irs 302.79 \ c \ \ � cone curb p ,46 \ cTtch basin y4 '§u. ON tt7P DIRE Nev. = 302.11 302.26 Hro +Nt-CENTER C.o\c \ �2'B (Tun of r„bbie 1 90L \ \ h »ptarj 1 ELEv�30SA6 FEET \ ♦ r \ L .91 • 302:47 ++ \ ♦ i 302.08 r 1 303.19 . • ♦ 1 yo 6 "•es.n sgt;me on1QPr 03 \\ ♦ .C/ i 03 30114� } \} �\ y / \303.,8 of • r Lod" ,tV`,°lc�_= .: C'� \,-,I t'o vs c - .=7 CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 19.,.. A.D. AT M IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE' AT THE REQUEST OF 7077- �1 7777 r- .Oopv�y v i cv- /75.0 aded �j I LEGAL DESCRIPTION l �co�ds v,�s�io�nis/i C�iyy ll�s��.s�i�%sue//arms': 61oc,� 3J ° f/T�rcP t/6!9 `Q748 "!T/, c, 7//ve Sc9'�708 /7S. /r,� 9 aid fie �`rG��©iirf of�yii>.�ir���' �/ierrCF' 9z ref S'J9 f/i�/x'� .S �04% Gam' i �ST1CJ'/�lco O� 71eeV/ ��� �`rG✓� poii�f� yii»irx� eS�oio�is✓% .5��t o/.C/�rs�: Less SURVEYOR'S its d�s��i�ec✓�i>dP.`- �G� ors" �/e `�2Z4�005 CERTIFICATE - Z,i"/�/W!/ THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF"`v,7e-,'''Wvo¢ IN �"'�� 19 L;7 PLAT OF SURVEY FOR f /oi,.�+`• o,� /o,�-s 9�/O B/ocic ,3' !�/�s' r� �.�1�v%.�'3b EYRING & ASSOC., INC. ' 23423 Highway 99 Edmonds, WA 98020 P. O. Box 32 Lynnwood, WA 98036 778-3101 U \ \ ew er m: . son. s Y\ rim !e f. e v 1: �, .3p 37 1 —1 i `C PARKING SPACES PARKING SPACES pROpi( BARRIER FREE pAgiaNG m • _ rn .,,,,,;. ,.:. s . • Uru�e.v t.t��v ���r✓IIVUv � . �. ,:. 6 7 6 BICYCLE C 1 l `y -- DIR ECT(ONAL: S SURFACE PROVIDE TACTILE WARNING' BUILDING\ r H.C. RAMP 1 .12 SLOPE A.C. PAVING � � . � •' � f' A► v . .. \ \ REMOVE EXISTG A.C. PAVIN G , \� • s 4 EXT RUDED RU E000N C=C CURBV '`. tre D Q I. I 1 1 \ .� 5 REM , r + i I C PJ— ;' A 7 \ \ �v ce, \ \ .✓ + i 1 ! 'etch- "basin 2 f I: • IeV. 301, 11 j t I / f t. f 1. / 1' \ i \ + 2 i o 1 v G 0 I • r pov ng \ / \ � f MON MENT Si GN• o, 4 �GRA I PH SCALE .. . 1,. *- -6: _ _ i. 16 0 24 1 � 5 0 .20 APrr PR X I ;, c� O H.C. ACCESS RAMP 1 SCALE N.T.S. I G co -4 CD fe*9 4119-4 9 1 . i-r (^a;r i PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 5. RECORD DRAWINGS 1. SCOPE OF WORK D. ALL GROUND COVER AREAS SHALL BE TREATED A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, TO THE ;ATMOSPHERIC "AS VACUUM WITH APRE-EMERGENT BEFORE FINAL LANDSCAPE OWNER, A COMPLETE -BUILT" DRAWING ON SEPIA BREAKER -MIN. 6" r A. THIS WORK SHALL CONSIST OF PERFORMING, INSPECTION. GROUND COVER AREAS SHALL BE WEEDED AND TWO PRINTS SHOWING EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL `ABOVE HIGHEST HEAD = � CLEARING, AND GRUBBING, SOIL PREPARATION, FINISH PRIOR TO APPLYING PREEMERGENT. PREEMERGENT TO `:, ITEMS INSTALLED. SE ARE TO BE DELIVERED THE BROWNLINE OR GALV. GRADING, PLANTING AND DRAINAGE, INCLUDING ALL BE APPLIED AS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. ON OR BEFORE FINAL INSPECTION. BROWNLINE OR GALV. NIPPLES & ELLS. LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOL, EQUIPMENT, AND OTHER 9• FINISH GRADING 6. TRENCHING NIPPLES t APPURTENANCES NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF l THIS PROJECT. A. ALL AREAS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE A. TRENCHES FOR PLASTIC PIPE SHALL PROVIDE BROWNLINE OR GALV. BROWNLINE MALE ADAPTOR 2. MATERIALS CONTRACTOR AT SUBSTANTIALLY PLUS/MINUS .1 FOOT A MINIMUM EARTH COVER OF 18 OR FROST DEPTH PIPE & ELLS. ON GRADE OF FINISH GRADE. ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE FOR ALL MAINLINE A. GENERAL - ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE OF ITS AND 12" MINIMUM OVER ALL "LATERAL LINES". ;FINISH GRADE KIND AVAILABLE. DO NOT BEGIN SOIL PREPARATION B. ALL LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED 5 AND PLANTING UNTIL IRRIGATION WORK AROUND PLANTING AREAS 15 COMPLETE AND APPROVED. TO A SMOOTH, EVEN UNIFORM PLANE WITH NO ABRUPT 7. CHANGE OF SURFACE. SOIL AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PRESSURE TESTING � I - ll]�T I I �Jl=llr BUILDINGS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS. A. ALL MAINLINES IN THE SYSTEM SHALL BE III -III ill: III=III- II III B. PLANTS -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY OR C. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND CAPPED AND PRESSURE TESTED AT 125 PSI FOR A PERIOD OF TWO HOURS. ANY LEAKS FOUND SHALL ;;A. PVC MALE ADAPTOR f NORMAL GROWTH, WELL ROOTED, FREE FROM DISEASE AND INSECTS. QUALITY AND SIZE OF PLANT MAINTAINED TO ALLOW FREE FLOW OF SURFACE WATER. BE CORRECTED BY REMOVING THE LEAKING PIPE OR MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STATE OF FITTINGS AND INSTALLING NEW MATERIAL IN ITS PVC PIPE PVC PIPE TO HEADS CALIFORNIA GRADING CODE OF NURSERY STOCK AND BE 10. GUARANTEE PLACE. I FROM CONTROL VALVE OF NUMBER ONE GRADE. A. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL 15 GALLON B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT ALLOW NOR CAUSE CONCRETE ANY OF THIS WORK TO BE COVERED OR ENCLOSED THRUST BLOCKS 3. 4. 5. m 7. 8. C. VARIETIES AND SIZES OF PLANTS SHALL BE AS PLANTS AND LARGER FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR. UNTIL IT HAS BEEN INSPECTED, TESTED AND SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL OTHER APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. C)_ FERTILIZER AND SOIL CONDITIONERS MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS. 8. COVERAGE TEST '- C) A. REDWOOD SHAVINGS - SHALL BE NITROGEN 11. CLEAN-UP A. WHEN THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS COMPLETED, ~ STABILIZED REDWOOD SHAVINGS (0.5% NITROGEN, DRY A. UPON THE COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK THE CONTRACTOR, IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ATMOSPHERIC VAC. BREAKER BASE). AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, THE CONTRACTOR OWNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SHALL B. ORGANIC FERTILIZER - SHALL BE PROCESSED SHALL REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND DEBRIS PERFORM A TEST COVERAGE OF WATER AFFORDED THE - - - - -.u.. ` '" ' "-" SEWER SLUDGE WITH MINIMUM CONTENT OF 1 % NITROGEN RESULTING FROM HIS WORK. ALL ACCEPTABLE LAWN AND PLANTING AREAS, COMPLETE AND �� AND 2% PHOSPHORIC ACID, EQUAL TO "NITROHUMIS". CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS AUTHORIZED ADEQUATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL REPRESENTATIVE. MATERIALS AND PERFORM ALL WORK REQUIRED TO C. ORGANIC FERTILIZER AND SOIL CONDITIONER - CORRECT ANY INADEQUACIES OF COVERAGE AT HIS SHALL BE GRO-POWER AND ORGANIC BASE MATERIALS 12. MAINTENANCE OWN COST. COMPRISED OF DECOMPOSED ANIMAL AND VEGETABLE MATTER AND COMPOSED TO SUPPORT BACTERIAL MAINTENANCE PERIOD TO COMMENCE AFTER FINAL 9. QUICK COUPLER CULTURES, CONTAINING NO POULTRY, ANIMAL OR HUMAN INSPECTION. A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL QUICK WASTE. GUARANTEED ANALYSIS (5-3-1) NITROGEN 5%, PHOSPHATE 3%, POTASH 1 %, 50% HUMIC AND 15% HUMIC A. MAINTENANCE PERIOD FOR THIS CONTRACT SHALL COUPLERS AT +/- 150 FEET O.C. THROUGHOUT THE ACIDS. AVAILABLE THROUGH: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BE 90 CALENDAR DAYS COMMENCING AFTER FINAL ENTIRE PROJECT OR AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. ORGANIC FERTILIZER CO. (181) 245-6849, GLENDALE INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION. CALIFORNIA. 10. CONTROLLER MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, GENERAL WORK PROCEDURES CULTIVATING AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY A. CONTROLLER LOCATIONS SHALL BE AS NOTED GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND ON DRAWINGS OR AS LOCATED BY OWNER'S A. LANDSCAPE WORK SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. WORKMANLIKE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR LANDSCAPE SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. B. 120 VOLT SERVICE AND HOOK-UP TO CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF CONTROLLER SHALL BE BY CONTRACTOR. IT IS THE INSECTS AND DISEASE. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE WEEDING PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT WHEN THE CONTROLLER IS A. BEFORE AND DURING PRELIMINARY GRADING AND MAINTAIN LAWNS BY WATERING, FERTILIZING. WEEDING, READY FOR 120 VOLT HOOK-UP. FINISH GRADING, ALL WEEDS AND GRASSES SHALL BE MOWING, TRIMMING, AND OTHER OPERATIONS SUCH AS ROLLING, REGRADING AND REPLANTING AS REQUIRED TO 11. LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRE DUG OUT THE ROOTS AND DISPOSED OF AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ESTABLISH A SMOOTH, ACCEPTABLE LAWN FREE OF ERODED OR BARE AREAS. -- A. ALL COMMON GROUND WIRE SHALL BE WHITE. SOIL CONDITIONING ' 13. MAINTENANCE (ALTERNATE BID) B. DIFFERENT COLOR WIRES SHALL BE USED ON A. CULTIVATE ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED TO A POSITIVE WIRE FOR EACH VALVE. DEPTH OF 6". ALL DEBRIS EXPOSED FROM EXCAVATION COST PER MONTH AFTER INITIAL 90 DAY MAINTENANCE i C. FOR WIRE SIZE REFER TO THE AND CULTIVATION SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT THE PERIOD. MANUFACTURER'S CHART. CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. SPREAD EVENLY IN ALL PLANTING AREAS AND TILL (2 DIRECTIONS) INTO TOP D. NO WIRES ARE TO BE SPLICED BETWEEN VALVE 4„ WITH THE FOLLOWING PER 1,000 SQ. FT.: ; ......_. _ ......_ _ _... _ . _._.......... _ . _. _..._.... _ . _ .... AND CONTROLLER EXCEPT AT VALVE LOCATION. IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS 4 CUBIC YARDS OF NITROLIZED REDWOOD SHAVINGS E. ALL VALVE HOOK-UPS SHALL BE WITH 150 POUNDS "GRO-POWER" RAINBIRD PEN-TITE WIRE CONNECTORS OR EQUAL. 100 POUNDS AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM 0 POUNDS NITROFORM (COARSE) 38-0-0 BLUE CHIP 1. SCOPE OF WORK 12. SITE VERIFICATION PLANTING A. THE WORK INCLUDED IN THESE A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONSIST OF THE CORRECTNESS OF ALL FINISH GRADES WITHIN THE POSITION TREES AND SHRUBS AT THEIR INTENDED FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR, TOOLS, MATERIALS, WORK AREA IN ORDER TO INSURE THE PROPER SOIL LOCATIONS AS PER THE PLANS AND SECURE THE APPROVAL APPLIANCES, TESTS, PERMITS, ETC., NECESSARY COVERAGE (AS SPECIFIED) OF THE SPRINKLER OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE EXCAVATING PITS, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LANDSCAPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM PIPE. MAKING NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS AS DIRECTED. SYSTEM, AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. A. PLANTING PITS SHALL BE DUG WITH LEVEL B. IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS 13. NOTE BOTTOMS, WITH WIDTH TWICE THE DIAMETER OF ROOT TO ACCOMPLISH THE WORK OF INSTALLING A A. CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE PREMISES CLEAN BALL AND 6 DEEPER THAN THE LENGTH OF ROOT BALL. SPRINKLER SYSTEM COMPLETE AND OPERABLE IN AN AND FREE OF EXCESS EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND EACH PLANT PIT SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH THE EFFICIENT AND SATISFACTORY MANNER ACCORDING RUBBISH INCIDENTAL TO WORK OF THIS SECTION. FOLLOWING PREPARED SOIL MIXED THOROUGHLY: TO THE WORKMANLIKE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED FOR 2 PARTS NITROLIZED REDWOOD SHAVINGS BY ' I SPRINKLER OPERATION FOR FULL COVERAGE. 14. GUARANTEE VOLUME 1 PART NITROHUMIS BY VOLUME 2. MATERIALS A. THE ENTIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TO MATERIALS 3 PARTS EXCAVATED SOIL BY VOLUME "AGRIFORM" ! AS PER IRRIGATION LEGEND SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. AND WORKMANSHIP, INCLUDING SETTLING OF 21 GRAM PLANTING TABLETS AS BACKFILLED AREAS BELOW GRADE FOR A PERIOD OF FOLLOWS: 3. VERIFICATION ONE (1) YEAR FOLLOWING THE DATE OF FINAL 2 TABLETS PER 1 GAL. PLANT ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. 3 TABLETS PER 5 GAL. PLANT A. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK, THE 4 TABLETS PER 15. GAL. PLANT TWO TABLETS PER 1 /2" CONTRACTOR SHALL CAREFULLY CHECK AND VERIFY 15. CLEAN-UP LARGER PLANTS (2) ALL DIMENSIONS AND REPORT ANY VARIATIONS TO DIAM. OF TRUNK CALIPER THE OWNERS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. A. UPON THE COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING B. PREPARED SOIL SHALL BE TAMPED FIRMLY AT B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE WORK, AND BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL MATERIAL, BOTTOM OF PIT. FILL PREPARED SOIL AROUND BALL FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, PRESSURE EQUIPMENT, AND DEBRIS RESULTING FROM HIS OF PLANT 1/2 WAY, AND INSERT PLANT TABLETS. AND DETAIL OF STUBOUTS PROVIDED AS THE SOURCE WORK. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE BROOM CLEANED R HO OU . COMPLETE BACK -FILLING AND WATER THOROUGHLY. OF WATER SUPPLY TO THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS AND THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE C. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET SO THAT, WHEN SHOWN ON PLANS. CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S SETTLED, THEY BEAR THE SAME RELATION TO THE C. THE CONTRACTOR FINDING ANY DISCREPANCIES AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. REQUIRED GRADE AS THEY BORE TO THE NATURAL GRADE ON THE DRAWINGS DURING BIDDING AND/OR PRIOR / 16. VALVE AND QUICK COUPLER LOCATIONS BEFORE BEING TRANSPLANTED. TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK, SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH ALL VALVES AND QUICK COUPLERS ARE TO BE LOCATED D. IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING, STAKE ALL TREES DISCREPANCIES. OTHERWISE THE CONTRACTOR MUST 12" FROM SIDEWALKS, CURBS, ASPHALTED CONCRETE TO PREVENT DAMAGE FROM WIND (LODGE -POLE STAKES I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL PAVING, ETC. (SLOPES EXCLUDED). LENGTH AS REQUIRED). FASTEN TREES TO UPPER END NECESSARY REVISIONS. OF STAKE IN AT LEAST TWO (2) PLACES USING HOSE TYPE TIES. D. ALL LOCAL, MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING E. PREPARE RAISED EARTH BASIN AS WIDE AS TO ANY PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY PLANTING HOLE OF EACH PLANT. i INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THEIR PROVISIONS SHALL BE F. WATER IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING. WATER CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR. SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH TREE AND SHRUB IN SUCH MANNER AS NOT TO DISTURB BACKFILL AND TO THE E. ALL WORK CALLED FOR ON THE DRAWINGS BY ' EXTENT THAT ALL MATERIALS IN THE PLANTING HOLE NOTES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED ARE THOROUGHLY SATURATED. WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IN THE G. BEFORE GROUND COVER PLANTING, REMOVE EARTH ` SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR DETAILS. BERM TO FINISH GRADE AND DISPOSE OF EXCESS SOIL. 4, SITE CONDITIONS GROUND COVER ` A. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE CAREFULLY A. ALL GROUND COVER AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 1 /4„ "NITROHUMIS" THE SITE OF WORK CONTEMPLATED AND THE PROPOSAL, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER LAYER OF RAKED INTO THE TOP 1" OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IT WILL BE ASSUMED THAT PREPARED SOIL PRIOR TO PLANTING GROUND COVER. THE CONTRACTOR HAS INVESTIGATED AND IS B. SPACING AND VARIETY OF GROUND COVER SHALL SATISFIED AS TO THE CONDITIONS TO BE ENCOUNTERED, PERFORMED, AND MATERIALS TO BE BE AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. FURNISHED, AND AS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRESSURE TYPE VACUUM -- BREAKER ASSEMBLY W/GATE VALVES REDUCED PRESSURE TYPE - VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY WITH GATE VALVES UNION (LIKE PIPE OR AS PER LOCAL CODE) FIN. GRADE AS PER LOCAL CODE co 0 T AS PER LOCAL CODE FROM P.O.C. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS ' ~ NTs 9 RP/PRESSURE VAC. BRKR. NTs 5 BOX TREE & GUYING .... _ _..... _...._.u... u._.._. _............_...._._.... 1 Y V 1 lJ ,J I I v IYi/ ,I I Y LINE TO VALVES SHRUB PLANTING I ABOVE GRADE AT SHRUB AREAS FIN. GRADE VALVE BOX W/ COVER (PLASTIC) APPROVED TYPE BERM TO BE ELEC. CONNECTOR W/ ED PRIOR TO 1" OF COILED EXTRA D COVER LAWN ' WIRE @ EA. CONNECTION LATION flM PLANTING I S (SEE SPECS) N FIN. GRADE ROOTBALL UNDISTURBED SOIL 1 CLASS 200 PVC 0/ WIRE TYP. TH BERM TO BE LOVED PRIOR TO )UND COVER OR 'N INSTALLATION z_ GRADE lif 1 /4"GALV. TYP. 1FORM PLANTING LETS (SEE SPECS) )TBALL ;KFILL MIX (SEE SPECS) 1 .._...................._.._.................NTS............ OPTIONAL PRESSURE REGULATING MODULE CONCRETE CURB OR WALK FIN. GRADE i-\1I_ 1 Rwswmoow DOD: o=Z9w �OzO�FwpOU1p a_�m' a�U) wmoo- O -069 SU r °(nwowax m orWLj3k �qhw ulbz- Ri4O OA z0wkj0`p?UI m�j�o au°'iwwoazffi ��--ZoZa~invium z •t m o c) ttn, : 1) sl U) to UNM co +- ;' o I- .0 o U a L o c� o rn; D N .y ` v �D V "o 3 J �45 C M H mgW li3lt arc a CU.FT. f� a BACKFILL MIX COMMON GRAVEL (SEE SPECS) WIRES I GALV. STL. NIPPLE sco GALV. STL. ' ELBOW OR PVC MALE PVC ADAPTOR PVC PLASTIC PIPE 2X4 RWD. BLOCK OR PVC 0CH.8Q NIPPLE? 90% COMPACTED N �3 BACKFILL MIX I o PILOT WIRE..._._...._..._..._... PVC SLIPxSLIPxTHREAD TEE PVC PLASTIC. MAIN LINE NTS 6 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE NTs 2 INSTALLATION OF HEAD: 73 PRIOR TO FINISH GRADING LODGE POLE1 FLUSH /W FINISH WONDER TIES OR a I 1" GRADE AT LAWN AREA APPROVED EQUAL \ h �; A a; j FURRING NAIL - ma,mu. EARTH BERM TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO GROUND COVER OR LAWN INSTALLATION FINISH GRADE _ AGRIFORM PLANTING PVC LATERAL PVC SLIPXSLIPX to m 1J1= TABLETS (SEE SPECS) THREADED TEE ' ROOTBALL o I o �, 2xBALL4 BACKFILL MIX { U (SEE SPECS) 4" & 6" SHRUB HEADS NTS 7 - TREE STAKING NTS 3 ......._ _. �........._...._.. _.. _..... _. _ __.... I ....._. _..._. __..._............._..._.._..._......._.._..._......_._..._..r..._.._._._._..._....-- _......... GARDEN VALLEY ABOVE GRADE IN " SHRUB OR GROUND 6 LOOSE KEY COVER AREAS (HOSE BIBB) I VALVE BOX W/ COVER; (PLASTIC)IN LAWN SHRUB HEAD AREAS ONLY FIN. GRADE N Y jF12ORNWALKE CURBCONCRETE CURB FIN. GRADE°O I 4 , a OR WALK a 1. 11 v a ' N r- 1" E COU i PVC ADAF o o PVC PRESSURE LINE CONCRETE CURB OR WALK POP-UP HEAD PVC NIPPLE PVC STREET ELL. rarl 2"X4" REDWOOD BLOCK QUICK COUPLER VALVE 1" BRASS NIPPLE BRASS ELBOW t CONC. THRUST BLOCK ` a IN UNDISTURBED OR o 90% COMPACTED SOIL 4.. a. • : K 1 /2" RISER PVC SCH. 80 PVC STREET ELL. PVC SLIPXSLIPX THREAD TEE. PVC LATERAL SPECIFICATIONS. ALL WORK ON SEPIAS SHALL BE I SHRUB BUBBLER HEADS C. IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING GROUND COVER, IN INK. QUICK COUPLER/HOSE BIBB NTSI CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY WATER GROUND COVER. � I ! _., ... t. r.: {.J v , n.i ,. e.FJr . .VY.is l.f/U t .lt.'. .S. �. \.. Yd Wh^y,'t>i'Vf?xh,•i•An. !-WpnWw-Y•Ay.Yb. • , .. .. _ .. ... .... ... ... ........ ..... r.,.....-.. ... .. ,.... ,. ..v„...._,,.„..... ... a-' ..,. o.:.,.,ht c'lb•f �.l•c1: •. , Jr. .. .. iY;�n ...... ,. .. .. .tlY{,.t CS%5. l/ . ... .. ..... .. ._...1-11. ..N.. .....n.r -..o ....�.. m: n.r-al .Ih^.... •.!n ro/.... ei.f. ... ... .... .. .i .l., i.. ,,, 1 .... ........ a.-.. ... .. 1.Y .: Y. .� r. : .., . � . ...,.. :.. .., _.. .. .. ... .... .... .., ,...... .. .... ... .. .. .. ._. .. - to „ .i .... ,fA .ur,. n .T@o-n. .. , •.'A. ..1 fl. ... .. .ia.. _c._N. a�itt-...'A .r ... .o 4.]..YY .., ... a.Y. _rr .... ... ... .. ... .r.. .._ a .. , ..... _.r. ,. .� � . ._.r. .n• .�.... ..., _ a.r. ., a .... ...•.. r... .. ,... „r. ... <. Ki"lkhr' 'Nu.' . r. „,h .� M. .r f .r ..r .r : , , „.!- ♦.. ,.. .f- n t.e . µ .„ .f .✓ t F Y . it , .i h rt ci '4 A-1 t < .YN..c♦ i..r i.:.+]4.f 1r.J SKa.. Ik-�U..k.ftG...hLi.G]N�KY.�i'lR...iei)¢.n_vn.r.t.1:,r1f 1,..r.al.rf .4 ,...•. .. 1. ...�S.t...,C...N ...hcl.:. rrt.r.. .e .r. 1.F ry. 1...r. if M.. .,K, Y..�'l .l i.. _e,F-YG .r1tA. l..a t•.. ravA .f l.. l,,. 1. .<,aar. c.ti .. •rf.1.e �, t. h. _.k n. i.:.c a.w.: . /�.:..a ... . NTSI 4 L_Li I Q_ < I � o z o u o � i w � Iw � � �� ,o la c) 0 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: _....... ... .... _....... ........ _....... ........ . BUILDING TYPE K--30 __.._.._..._..._..FRAM E __.._.__....�_... SITE NUMBER EDMONS, WA PROTOTYPE ISSUE DATE 3/28/00 ............ . . SHEET NUMBER L2 Plant twice ball C: Prune diseased and broken branches 16 gauge steel wire through clear vinyl hose below first crotch 2x2 wooden stakes securely driven into ground. Stain brown. Water basin with 2" mulch Unglazed planting pit surface 1 /2 toposoil, 1 /2 native soil, water horougnly, fertilize DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL No Scale Prune .diseased and broken branches W"ter basin with 2' mulch Compacted topsoil water thoroughly, fertilize as req'd Planting hole min. twice size of root ball SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL No Scale NOTES 1. Subgrades, including berms, to within 1/10th foot provided by General Contractor unless otherwise noted. 2. Subgrade shall be scarified or rototilled if conditions require. 3. 4" depth 3—way topsoil or equal in all planting areas. 4. 2" depth fine grade bark mulch in all planting beds. 5. All plant material shall be healthy, full and conform to USA standard nursery stock, latest edition. 6. Plant material or size or kind not available may be substituted only with approval of Landscape Architect or Owner. 7. All mass plantings shall have triangular spacing. 8. All tree pits shall be inspected to insure proper drainage. 9. Positive drainage shall be maintained. Mound planting areas minimum 12 . 10. Shrubs and trees minimum 42" from curb for car overhang unless wheelstops noted. 11. 8" wide bark mowing strip where lawn is adjacent to building. 12. Landscape Contractor shall maintain site until final inspection and acceptance by Owner. Planting bed LAWN / PLANTING BED DETAIL No Scale Planting bed with 2" mulch 1 /2 spacin distance No Scale— Triangular Spacing PLANT LIST STREET TREES PER CITY OF EDMONDS STREET TREE PLAN SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON Street tree Acer Rubrum/bow hall maple 2" Cal. inus contorta / Shore Pine 7' min. B&B 0 Carpinus betulus ' Fastigiato / Hornbeam 2" Cal. B&B cer circinatum / Vine Maple 8', 5 cane min. B&B e 0 Euonymus alata Compacto / Compact Burning Bush 5 gallon OViburnum tinus Spring Bouquet / Spring Bouquet Viburnum 5 gallon 21" min. 4' O.C. • Rhododendron variety 27" min. 0 Thuja 0. ' Emerald Green / Emerald Green Arborvitae 6' min. B&B Viburnum davidii 2 gallon OPrunus L. Otto Luyken / Otto Luyken Laurel 21" min. 3' O.C. Buxus M. Winter Gem / Winter Gem Boxwood 18" min. 2' O.C. 't`r++'+++++ Erica cornea ' Mediterranean Pink ' / Mediterranean Pink Heather 1 gallon 24" O.C. Vinca minor/ Periwnkle 4" Pots @ 18" O.C. Arctostaphylos uva—ursi / Kinnikinnick 4" Pots © 18" O.C. Sodded Lawn ' Existing trees to be removed NOTES A BIDDER DESIGN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SCALE:1 "=10'-0" 0 5' 10' 20' LOT 9 RECEIVED APR 2 0 2UX09 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS LOT 7 STREET FI 4_ E7 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KEN LONEY CERTIFICATE No. 363 MAIN STREET DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 110 Third Ave. N. (425) 771-4809 Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-5728 Fax LANDSCAPE PLAN W m 0 z 0 M 0 Ld w o) � r- o o RENSIONS 1 10/9/00 1 CRY COMMENTS 2 12/6/00 SITE PLAN CHANGES 3 1/25/01 I SITE PLAN CHANGES DRAWN BY: JK CHECKED BY. KL BUILDING TYPE K-30 FRAME SITE NUMBER EDMONDS, WA PROTOTYPE ISSUE DATE 1'1 /12/00 SHEET NUMBER L-1 RE:CE:I,VE:D APR 2 0 20uni DEVELOPMr:NSERVICES CTIj. CITY OFTE ,M ONDS P- I Plant twice ba I I N Prune diseased and broken branches 16 gauge steel wire through clear vinyl hose below first crotch 2x2 wooden stakes securely driven into ground. Stain brown. Hater basin with 2" mulch Unglazed planting pit surface 1/2 topsoil, 1/2 not lve soil, water thoroughly, fertilize DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL No Scale Ira rune diseased and r 0-&. 1 branches W-0 = / basinter F 2" mulch �•-4u It ° ; iHater thorouqhl�, Ifertilize as recld Plantinq hole, min. uvaaunooi�i 11 uuuuuomv ii I 11 tt t utwice - of root SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL No Scale NOTES I. Subgrades, including berms, to within 1/I0th foot provided by General Contractor unless otherwise noted. 2. Subgrade shall be scarified or rototilled if conditions require. 5. 4" depth 5-way topsoil or equal in all planting areas. 4. 2" depth fine grade bark mulch in all planting beds. 5. All plant material shall be healthy, full and conform to USA standard nursery stock, latest edition. 6. Plant material or size or kind not available may be substituted only with approval of Landscape Architect or Owner. 7. All mass plantings shall have triangular spacing. 8. All tree pits shall be inspected to insure proper drainage. a. Positive drainage shall be maintained. Mound planting areas minimum 12". 10. Shrubs and trees minimum 42" from curb for car overhang unless wheelstops noted. II. 8" wide bark mowing strip where lawn is adjacent to building. 12. Landscape Contractor shall maintain site until final inspection and acceptance by owner. Lai LAWN / PLANTING BED DETAIL No Scale - e - Planting bed P41th 2" mvlah 1/2 distance GROUND COVER SPACING DETAIL No Scale- Triangular Spacing PLANT LIST 0 ft" 5 O� 0 �psoll �© bed BOTANICAL / COMMON . 1 . 1 l 1 . t . 1 1 1 . 1 . Street tree per City Of Edmonds street tree plan 2" Gal. inus contorta / 5hore Pine T min. 5$ B ® Acer circinatum / Vine Maple 5, 5 cane min. B4 B A Euonymus alata ' Gompocta ' / Compact Burning Bush 5 gallon Viburnum tinus ' 5pring Bouquet ' / Spring Bouquet Viburnum 5 gallon 21" min. 4' O.G. • Rhododendron variety 2-7" min. 0 Thuja O. ' Emerald Creen '/ Emerald Creen Arborvitae 6' min. B$B 0 Viburnum davidii 2 gallon 00 Prunus L. ' Otto Luyken ' / Otto Luyken Laurel 21" min. 5' O.G. Buxus M. 'Hinter Cem ' / Hinter Cem Boxwood 15" min. 2' O.G. +++++++++++++ ++++++ Erica carnea ' Mediterranean Pink ' / Mediterranean Pink Heather I gallon 24" O.G. Vince minor/ Periwnkle 4" Pots e 15" O.G. A otostophylos uvo-ursi / Kinnikinnick 4" Pots @ V' O.G. Sodded Lawn IExisting trees to be removed x WFAMI +++++ +++++ +++ ++ +++ t ++++ ++++ NOTE: +++++ • + OO' O O An automatic irrigation � 00 systom H i I I bo provided O' for all I andsca od areas / LOi :L©CK3 WESTCATE PACK DIU. +1 'LOT 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED rMPE ARC ITE T KEN LONEY CERTIFICATE No. 363 ZWWoxwo UMP-0 3iaoXaO�6 �D(4oOW ow Z(Lwo m� WWoz� i Imm3ao d -W wFnJODJQSU �w-w IX'wDza Wa J to U1wOU1p T1.,, 1�n��ZoZ�o3a�F�F-- S � Wgiongp DD pZZF-U _jU)(n ZQO0UQtr Q0x C,WraN n dFQWffj:Z nW =U�SQJZ'O U)t! hx<Qm0 f 0 'aoiwwd Z�tL_a Mt--WO�SUrz F-Da aJ-pWW ozW�.o0 mmu zQWoptn -<W!i N to C) (DIV C*q N U :t m r ' i o U L o c M m co (ii D N 'x O m On U � 3 o� C M v =j N Ld m 0 U 0 z 0 � o Ld G w O o p Q REVISIONS MAIN STREET DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 110 Third Ave. N. (925) 771-4809 Edmonds, WA 98020 (925) 771-5728 Fax DRAWN BY: A CHECKED BY: KL BUILDING TYPE K-30 FRAME 00-47 EDMONDS, WA PROTOTYPE ISSUE DATE 5/12/00 SHEET NUMBER L-1 3� h 1) -1 C � 10' SEVIER EASEMENT REC. #1911340 fnd. rebor & cop op�o 299.06 Is #6434. 1.35x2.15 \ power vault r'4„6 298.25 power pole elev. = 29� \� i.. - y� son, sewer m.h. #1 rim elev.=298.49 could not open s LEGEND: 0 DENOTES FOUND REBAR WITH LS CAP # 6434 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 7 AND 9, BLOCK 3, WESTGATE PARK, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10 IN SAID BLOCK 3; THENCE N 89'47'08" W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, RESPECTIVELY, 501.15 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS S 89'47'08" E 175.00 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 0'12'52" W 204.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE N 40'23'05" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 7 AND 9, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH THE LINE IS ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EDMONDS WAY 268.92 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE S 89'47'08" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 A DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2246005. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. AREA = 15,276 SQ. FT. - 0.35 ACRES ELEVATIONS: BASIS IS BENCH MARK SET ON TOP OF FIRE HYDRANT AT THE CENTER OF CAP BOLT. VL7 117 it- ♦ 1 299.66 ro G� \ 298.89 Q 300.42 v fl 01\vy�a2 \ fruit tree o °1 \ 299.93 \ \\ 300.25 Is, 01.08 \ r ' s � SJ4�� ELEV. = 305.16 FEET 'U CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT 301.26 Q '\ 33001.�3 �/' rG lam" "6 11L c� TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING A CITY ENGINEER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 1. Arrange and attend preconstruction meeting with City of Edmonds Inspector. 2. Arrange and call for existing utility locations. 3. Review ESC notes. 4. Flag clearing limits. 5. Install filter fence. 6. Install construction entrance. 7. Install CB protection in existing CB's as shown. 8. Reference stabilization of exposed area requirements. 9. Perform clearing and grading. 10. Install utilities. 11. Provide CB protection (new CB's) immediately after installation of storm drains. 12. Seed or surface disturbed areas. 13. Remove silt fences after site has been stabilized and the City's Inspector has approved the removal. FACE OF CURB �� \ = CLEARING IMIT ALONG R/W F ONTAGE s \ \SILT FENCE BEHIND WALK \ ss % 4- EXS`'j CB TE=301.61 IE=2950(12"OUT) INSTALL \\ TESC CB INSERT LANDCAPING i 302.14 I son. sewer m.h. # I SIGN rim elev. = 301.37 \ \ 02.36 catch basin #3 301.4$ SYjm elev. = 301.35 INSTALL \ ESC CB INSERT \ T 'kM. ON TOP FIRE \ \ HYD ANT -CENTER CAP \ BOLT, \ ELEV. 305.16 FEET � ss 4 ss x 302.08 INSTALL TE C CB INSERT \ s s \ o' \ k 's s fnd. rebor & cop \ is #6434 - �''--- fence is 0.53 N. 0 ��u' � of NE prop. car. x 303.43 303.14 I 226TH ST SW - -� 226TH OODWAY SW 228TH ST d S 10500 302.8 J I Q a f C 1 a SWP I-- �1 S1 ��� SST SW 303.35 R OB I o W fi� IAD ti �, �� 4 \� 10 r 30 .-1 I Ld RD a 302.80 ROOST RD) . \ � w I-''/L = CLEARING LIMIT TYP 302.61 2.70 x 303.31 x 303.41 I SIGN 1 04 / ` 00 06 00 \ I w •Q N ILn N O r a I. Z X 3.47 3f3.01 1 I 4, 30 .43 \ ss \ 4- Q \ o°� N / / 303.06 / O';c100' Ol'ISTRUCTION 303.19 I times square on sign post h � U C� 303.90 Q�. x 30318 I4TH WY o0 .0 V) 0 SW � N j 3 I41 a) < SW 2��T11 p4.SW 226TH PL SW S Q rX q. d ¢ P L w � 227TH 2277 H �� cn co M 228TH METERi, 9640 a 228TH �E PL SW , Cn i EDM NDS \71 3; 3% SNOW USH CaUNTY 232ND '231.ST PL iE 232ND ST W o Q c M m PL SW 232ND � 13: EDWA10- < iE 2 3RD ST SW WOODWAY HS 234TH -3: ST SW 9700 .1 Ci v CL �� r 236T� 32 3 6 T.H 236TH � sw P `� Q Cv 01999Tr0ma8e VICINITY MAP APPROVED FOR NSTRUCTION 7 CITY ENGINEER DATE 3R4.32 )304.14,5/8/01 REVISED PER CITY OF EDMONE ' EXPIRES 5/14/�� 299.14 UTILITY NOTE: I) CONTRACTOR SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT (OVWSD) PRIOR TO START OF WATER INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL OVWSD FOR WATER LINE INSPECTION AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR SIDE SEWER INSPECTION. pi 55" fnd. rebor & cap 299.06 Is 6434 1.35x2.15 oo�r # power vault fence Is 0,21 S. 10' SEWER EASEMENT REC. #1911340 CONN TO EXST 8 SS elev. = 299.72 VERIFY LOCATION fnd. rebor & cap oC;1 298.25 power pole of prop. line is #6434 6�\ w/u power/light pole 5 20' INGRESS. EGRESS EASEMENT elev. 298.93 -- />>- t pN, - chain link fence- o. $:19 4.9 ,�o N 89'47 08 W 161.81 ^�o so ran. sewer m.h. #1 0�' y`b �"•Z99.63 _ x x ., _ _ _. _ X- - _ rim elev.=298.49 x 00 42 03�1 could not open _ _ _ - - - - _ - - _ - - - - o fence is 0. 8 N. / ofnNE ce Ipr p. car. 99.0 catch basin #1 1�- chain link f�flc;e ae r OV iEAO POWER AND TcLEPHON� !_INES I 0 �� ' 2 .49 29 r rn pleg:' _ �a4 n� ISS 8 SS SSA 8' 8 S5 8" SS 8" SS 8" S \c 299.16 PROPOED LANDCAPING R \ M i� 01 6 �SSCO Wj LOCKING / 0 ♦ _ LP \ / BREAK \ 6 SSS, CONN ALL ( o 15 x 01.07 PLUIABING FIXTURES x 3Q1.97C: -�' 0 7 RAISE EXST c4� P� O 6" S OTHER THAN \ �' x 2.85 0 9 / ss RIM TO 299.3 \ Y♦ 99 66 �___./ KITCHEN SINKS \\ ��� ��- 303.43 FG AROUND CB 303.14 I / �ALLBE299.7.M1 N W IE=298.0 0) / e o � �' / V `f ' �� .7.r, ar 298.89 99 1 3x CO 302.02 52LF � 8� \ \ �o `.�\ o. �� 30 .S �. 6"DI ♦ �~``�300.42 tS UTILITY VAULT 577-GA, �� \ \` -gym 1 \ \Z 302.25 �4� nr 302.8 ss �1.0% \ �o @a9 C� 950 GAL \ G r sph r GREASE INTERCEPTOR z \ n, moo^ \ ♦ ° T 0 BELL \\ � e (A _ 1 2. \ eLi� 2. 0 0 a- •-. 3�^, ss \ ♦ fruit tree 3o1.F=303.0 �� ° CONN ALL r,° \ CB#5 c °4r ` x 3 93 19' KITCHED S�AJ S �1�� 299.93 \ \ �'� \ a� \ x 302.72 a y _ _ 01.32 Qc/ \ cy °1 x 303.35 ss c x 301.83 , "`- 300 14 0 \ CB#2 / 302.39 r ss 81DI R L�'srs �� / f CbN SIDEWAL 74 z LIJ ��� ♦ F�-Fo "��\MZ,2�4 -/30O 1?° fr it/ 01.52 / x 3 2.64 302.80 C3 ri �f, Y 301. 9 / Q Dim RW mama�l - CB# TYPE TE IE IE CB#1 II-54" 302.0 ® 296.13(ALL) CB 2 II-48" 301.65 296.64 8"IN 296.13 30"OUT CB 3 1 301.0 297.0 CB#4 1 303.13 300.82 CB#5 1 301.36 297.48 STORMCEPTOR ® 301.7 ® 296.04 IN 295.96 OUT 11) FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE, SEE DETAIL, OF=299.13 ® SOLID, LOCKING LID ® 900 SERIES, CONTACT CORKY LAMBERT AT 503-702-0939 FOR ORDERING REQUIREMENTS. GREASEINTERCEPTORS SINGLE VAULT SYSTEM Dim. •A• 600-6000 Gallon Capacities Clear Access Openinps Grout Both sides A i i A t STC 900 Precast Concrete S ormce ptor® (900 US Gallon Capacity) 3oo.2s 61 \ 'off Sid" as �P� // 02.47 V, � I PLAN VIEW SW 6.80 hi ���/ CO �� �^ S�F / p I Both Sides 24• Dla. Looking Frame and Cover SEE NOTE # 1 \ �n 1 1 /2" vent Pig AdJuet To Grade Gas 2 Places on 577-GA ) - 01.08 \E ♦ r`^6 I \C / W SVC 302.61 �^ - / / STORMCEPTOR COVER s \� 02.21 / x 302.12 2.70 303.31 1'0 AND GRATE 32"0 t ;•:+' • 10" uit tree s T 300.72♦ 30 `\ '�� GRADE ADJUSTERS TO ZFl�. / !� x 303.41 V. I ` GRAD 5 :• : • \ �� 1.9� P��I ..'•Q r. : or. SUIT FlNISHED E� •c' „o � � �` � � •.- ,_ �'" SIGN I INLET �. _ �,� In at+ecuon r� OUCTt.i' TyI 2• I ` --6 VENT N. \ 03.05 l - �1---- ----------r--I-� }t1= ' PIPE I r4^6 ♦ 03� sib � s• :o' �� i I '..--------`i i 6 \ - 300.19 01.83 2LF-30 CMP r r .. , \ tr � � Op Tee or Elbow .�= I 1 •' 6 1 VARIABLE ss \ a %h o2. \ K 3 98 LEVEL 0296.13 ° i i Dim•c• 7" DIA. O. fruit rn Dan "E• tre 01 f TYP w / Water Depth i i :'q 2$- y tfO ` ` a I 1 I t I Dan •tr 70. c' F� 16LF-8 SI o l „ x 302.36 _ so \ �y� r� ®5.43% 111 4 ; 18LF- 8 SD a o .. o:.. e . I 00. 5% O Grout AN Around ET 18 \ t� 301.16 \ 6'�. ` CB�ji3 _ J a Both Sides Sit - ' ; / ♦ 1 W z ( 213 Length 113 Len O ss \ . N ¢P�'� i (J� SECTION VIEW AA i J a 1 0 1� NOTE : 1. THE USE OF FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS IS RECOMMENDED AT THE INLET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE 2. THE COVER SHOULD BE POSITIONED OVER THE OUTLET DROP PIPE AND THE VENT PIPE 3. THIS IS A GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING -CONSULT LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 305 300 8" IN FROM CB#5 295 00 '4' I 290 w N m U 0 2.24 1' OPENING 1 x 33.47 0 81 I IN CURB U BER ss I ♦ / q... ALLEY GASKET PER \ 301.26 \ ♦ catch sin 2 ASTM C 443 \ 302. 1 - ' 1 STORMCEPTOR \ ENLARGED GED 0�1-T�,ET �%/. \ f�, ss � 12LF I CONNECTION DETAIL FINISHED GRADE 211 IVENT tPE - 65LF-42" CMP LEVEL 0295.63 2LF w 2L 30" M P 30 o ,J EV L @296.13 LE J � C9 20 z = U � M O CO (O J .- `- tD Ct7 O M N N ww 0 1+00 1 +50 DETENTION CONVE" SCALE: HOR- 1"=' VERT- 1"=1 ate• / h, pov s16�e el e = 30 �.68 f 301.77 Po -- W. ele 302.79 \ ♦ - co \ Yp• \ 30 �0�. 91 1 1 1 \ EXST 41 C1<1 ss. \ \�CF-8"GONG GALLON CAPACITY 600 7:50 9 1000 12550 15M 1750 2000 2500 2750 30D0 � 3000 GOOD UV Co. MODEL No. 577-GA 577-GA 577-GA -GA 44<µ-CA s106-CA, 5105 CA 412-GA 612-CA 612-GA 717-GA 712-GA 0111-CM 918-GA DIM •A• r-0- 7'-0' r-O' 9'-0' V-0- 11'-r ll'-r Ur-8' 12'-e 12'-8' Is -I* is -I' Ig'-II* 19'-it• DIM "8' V-8' 4'-8' 4'-8' 5'-0' 5'-0' 5'-r S'-8' 8'-8- 6'-r 6'-ar i 0- ✓T-0' 9'-11' 9'-Ir DIM 'C' r-W r-O' 7'-0' r-2' r-2' r-r 7'-r 8'-W 8'-0' 8'-O' Ir-7' 8'-7' Fir 10'-5- DIM -D' T-8' 4'-3' V-3' 4'-r 5'-2' 4'-4- 4'-11- 4'-r V-6' S'-0' S'-O' 8'-8' 8'-2- r-2' WATER DEPTH DIM -E' T-2- T-11' 4'-11• 3'-10' 4'-10' 4'-0- 4'-r 3'-10- 4•-r r-r e' r S'-1' 4•-9" 3P3.01 DESIGN CRITERIA Uniform Plumbing Code - Appendix H i1 7 PerrPPea Hours X Waste X mein X Factor INGGACAPACITY n g 3/0 2. 7 4 I UTILITY 11AULT ,XMPANY '.O. 3OX 588 Phone 1253) 339.3500 Auburn.'Nasnington 98071.0588 73x 125317315• 201 Q�. � 303.40 - - 2.87 x 302.52 m. >' wer/light pole SIGN VERIFY EXST WM SIZE v. = 303.14 0" REQUIRED) nc. curb GRADE, e��r B�!EAR ( ��- �j t !.I L(0) 1 � , catch asin #4 rim ev. = 302.11 (full of dirt, rubble ater) \ 1 \ 302.47 ASPHALT BERM � I X 303.19 ` "times square ontS)ue S ° sign post V u CB#4 "' `_3g4.32 C"§ / ) o�U' 03. / ,304.144. 3g 30 .43 1 03.80 19 IH TRAFFIC �� 30 3 DER ss 4 303.90 ~ I E2.27 EXST 1, Q s' x 303.18 o� .67 303.06 NOTES: 1. Concrete: 28 Day Compressive Strength fc m 4500 psi 2. Reber. ASTM A-615 Grade 60 3. Mesh: ASTM A-185 Grade 65 4. Design: ACI-318-M Building Code ASTM C-857'MMmum Structural Design Loading For Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures' 5. Loads: H-20 Truck Whorl w/ 30% Impact Per AASHTO 6. Fill w/ Clean Water Prior To "Start -Up" Of System 7. Contractor To Supply and Install All Piping and Sampling Tees S. GRAY WATER ONLY, Black Water Shall Be Carried By Separate Side Sewer. ITEMS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY ENGINEER DATE EXPIRES 5/14/0_1 GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WSDOT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, 2000 EDITION. 2. CONNECT ALL ROOF DRAINS TO DETENTION PIPE SYSTEM. 3. CMP SHALL BE 16 GAGE GALVANIZED STEEL OR ALUMINUM. STEEL DETENTION PIPE SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1 COATING OR BETTER. DETENTION PIPE SHALL BE 3X1 CORRUGATIONS 16 GAGE. 4. CONCRETE 12" STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE NON -REINFORCED ASTM C-76 AND CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP) SHALL BE SMOOTH INTERIOR PER AASHTO M252 IN 8 INCH SIZE AND AASHTO M294S IN SIZES 12 INCH THROUGH 36 INCH. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CL 52. PVC SHALL BE EQUAL TO SANITARY SEWER PIPE AS SPECIFIED BELOW. ANY PIPE DESIGNATED AS "SD" MAY BE ANY TYPE LISTED HEREIN. CPEP NOT ALLOWED UNDER TRAVELED SURFACES WITH LESS THAN 2 FEET OF COVER. 5. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034, SDR 35. 6. CALL ENGINEERING DIVISION (425-771-0220 EXT. 1326) FOR PRE BACKFILL, SIDE SEWER, WATER SERVICE AND ALL OTHER ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING FINAL INSPECTION. CALL 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 7. RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. MATERIAL ACCUMULATED IN THE STORAGE PIPE MUST BE FLUSHED OUT AND REMOVED FROM CATCH BASINS TO ALLOW PROPER OPERATION. THE OUTLET CONTROL ORIFICE MUST BE KEPT OPEN AT ALL TIMES. 8. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE AND ALL UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS AS REQUIRED. CALL 1-800-424-5555 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AT ALL TIMES UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION. ENSURE SILT DOES NOT ENTER OFF -SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED ONTO CITY STREETS. TESC MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE A GUIDE. THE CITY'S INSPECTOR MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEASURES. ESC NOTES: ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED "DRAIN" W/ LOCKING BOLTS. STEPS OFFSET. FRAME AND COVER ELEVATION 302.0 OVERFLOW 299.13 - 6" DIA ELBOW W/ ORIFICE. DIA=1.O" 8" OUT( 296.13 0.98" DIA ORIFICE POLYPROPYLENE STEPS 1. ESC Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spoils or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. 2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land- disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of 8MPs, including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30). 3. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination• of these measures and other appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly inspected and maintained by. the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual. 1 six EYE ON 10 . BOLTING "VSTABLE LOCK HOOK W'TH LOCK SCREW 1' ROD OR TUBING, VARWBL.E LENGTH r� z F 1:1 n LIFT ROD AS SPEC. BY MFR. W/ HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN ONE FT. OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOODLOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLE. -7 z CV T SHEAR GATE SEE DETAIL 30'# 295.63 „ LEVEL, 296.13 NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED & COATED W/ ASPH PER TREATMENT 1. 2. ORIFICE SHALL BE SHARP EDGE, SHOP DRILLED. FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE NTS 6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following (CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH INSPECTOR TO UTILIZE APPLICABLE ITEMS IN 6a though 6e): a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. 6. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses. 13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization Is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized FRONT SIDE MAXIMUM OPENING OF GATE LIFT HANDLE SHALL BE ATTACKED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CLEANOUT/SHEAR GATE ALTERNATES ARE ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED MATERIAL SPECIFICPATTERN MATCHES. ARE 'MET AND FLANGE BOLT WSDOT/APWA PLAN 8-3 SEE TEXT SECTION IN75-10 iNT-51900998 PATTERN MIITCHi;S. p ved by� Snohomish County Public Works Snohomish County, Washington %�r (NTS 190 FROP T SHEAR GATE DETAIL County Road Engineer Date FILTER FABRIC - SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2' X 2' WOOD OR EQUIVALENT 8'- 12' FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL. Its CONTINOUS ROLLS. USE STi4PLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH( FABRIC TO WIRE, It II �i WIRE MESH SUPPORT 1 TO SUPPORT FILTER Zo---ii-- -------------------�-a_1+--- BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL 8' TO 12' g.tf 1 oL b' MA&LJ t PLACE 3/4'-1.5' MASHED GRAVEL IN THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF �2' X 2' W j FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. WOOD POSTS OR . EQUIVALENT r� EXCAVATE TRENCH 8' DEE$, � _ WHERE STRAW BALES WILL I '' �! t ► I' BE PLACED AND STAKE BA;.£S. IX T T.1:.:.1 1 r ix r i iiT7! rTI i iT -rl 1.1TTT1111 p TWO STAKES PER BALE T MAINTAIN POSITION J1 STRAW BAI_ & AS REQUIRED. < CONCRETE CURD AND GUTTER. - OR 16• VERTICAL. CURB (TO R�4TCH VA S P R TO ETND GOFC RADIUS SHALL EX.1'END EXTRUDED CURB SHALL START; AT END OF RADIUS RADIUS VARIES � TRANSITION SLt1Pl: SHALL' BE 1110 (TYP) TYPE I CURB RAMP i 3' LONG RAP MIN, a A LACE V WIDE TACTILE A P BEHIND START OF RAMP CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER PLACE FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT p , BETWEEN. C/G AND HI NOT FFIR, OAS 8 T5NtT IF WING AND C/G AM PLOT AND WING FOR HIGH TRAP 'IC LOAD GUTTER MAY BE POURED AS LINE t�41T. FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL' BE PLACCR IF WIDTH OF OPENING EXCEEDS 15'. ACP ACP �o i SECTION A I SOLID WALLS FILTER MEDIA -, FOR DEWATERING CATCH BASIN � GRATE OVERFLOW NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE, THE MEANS TO DEWATER THE STORED SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW, AND CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. 1 ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ON OR AROUND THE FILTER FABRIC PROTECTION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITH WATER. .r�T�T1TwT.A�AND ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE DISPOSED OF AS FILL ON SITE OR HAULED OFF SITE. ,t►rl7/►Te►Ti1!►�!/►�►i►'►�� h rwTl`'A►"M,�TLr�`U��,�1i�11i\ t2. ANY SEDIMENTREMOVED SEDIMENT HAS FILLED ONE-THIRD OF THE THE FILTER MEDIA I'T,Nr*T1'T. T,�'�1'!►1',111P�T1T"►7�ti. • • • - , MONTHLY. AVAILABLE 7�Ti►T�'1'1T��►I►7�TA�iT�T►�A'r1.'Ti��• . r�7/►T.�T,►Tj►T�,�I►T�71T�r�T%TYT�'T�T�'Ii►'�i►'TTj►��� . ..1T,�T1T%►�T�'fI►T�r� u►e'►W!:1kT1►!!1%! !,f►TA1TVTA .►VWTWVA1Ti►•.. REGULAR - • - ALL FORMSOF 1L1'ICI'1'1'1'Ir��,,T�71'/iT►'Il�ii.Ti�j'��MjT1Tl7it►►h'/►rl7A'I��I ��'�.. PROTECTION. • - OF PROTECTION THAT FAIL G- ADUALLY CATC11 'r�,r�►��►T��A•�ir'�►r��`MT�7�T1'r1rI�T.�T1.'�1�1`�`�T1Ti►`I,i►'�5`�l�'1'�,►'M1'�LT�'�'1•. BASIN PROTECTION WILL FAIL SUD DD COMPLETELY IF NOTD ,.►) %VIr�""' '_,"".;T�71�;.`!l�'w'F,��'i'1iYl�'►Tl'f�Ti'r,►TI►'L`rL�'i►T1Yi�i�l!�►ri� . '`��.'i►i►'!I►T��I►T.��'�`�,I►�Ar.,�'Ir1►�Ti�IlIIT�'i,►'r�'!►�T�TiT.��i► ., ICATCH ►T��I�h�T,l'Ir,�.'!',A,Ne1�'h/,`ICIi�1ir1'�`1'�!!.�lr'' `��1.T1 LT�T,►T�T�Tj7� i7:►�iT1Ti��i1"�"` ""{ BASIN �A�,Lr �T�'1►�I!I,TI'NTS ROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY ENGINEER DATE EXPIRES 5/14/p� n n / 4� cv� / / VICINITY MAP: (% o� r L son, sewer m.h. #1 rim elev. .-298.49 could not open \�CJ� GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND: o DENOTES FOUND REBAR WITH LS CAP # 6434 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 7 AND 9, BLOCK 3, WESTGATE PARK, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10 IN SAID BLOCK 3; THENCE N 89'47'08" W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, RESPECTIVELY, 501.15 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS S 89'47'08" E 175.00 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE S 0'12'52" W 204.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE N 40'23'05" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 7 AND 9, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH THE LINE IS ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EDMONDS WAY 268.92 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE S 89'47'08" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 A DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2246005, SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ELEVATIONS: BASIS IS BENCH MARK SET ON TOP OF FIRE HYDRANT AT THE CENTER OF CAP BOLT. ELEV. = 305.16 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT AREA = 15,276 SQ. FT. - 0.35 ACRES fnd. rebar & cap Is #6434, _ 1.35x2.15 power vault STATISTICS: TAX NUMBER: PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROVIDED: OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDINGS: FLOORS: BUILDING SQ. FT.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING: fence is 0.21 S. ,10' SEWER EASEMENT REC, #1911340 e 6106-003-0007 1 PER 200 SQ. FT. (1,682/200=8) 10 B TYPE V-N ONE ONE 1,682 SQ. FT. 10119 EDMONDS WAY BN NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS \ PROPOSED LANDSCAPING \ I� son. sewer rn.h. #2 4\ rim elev. = 301,37 J � \ca•tch basin #3 r�i elev. = 301.35 - B.M. ON TOP FIRE \ I-IYbRANT-•CENTER CAI' E3OLT\ ELEV. - 305.16 FEET F)d'-d" rim elev. = 302.11 (full of dirt, rubble & water) EXIST'G \ 4� b(JRBCUT \ 6 �G fnd. rebar & cop is #6434 LOT 9 LOT 7 25,°w�'o=�ww o ZWw°wK~O 3Maolao w g0�0Ow� ;Z W<wowp~oQ> 5A w QaF-mw°Ooz°w oz Fxww>_ ,waWa�3om� Zrr1G°a (U w wH=O W01Q:waiW w 0° a6°�0�a3F v,_o VnwQ�Nz �O= uZo 0 wg(t 0OZI--0- Z °~2F0.S0. W0(A NLLFVO-o 9> COLdw< 7°Vaw :3 a. Vlw paZ WL) 0.0W wF•43 �ZoZa a�_uww zQ�O°0�3�1a/r¢ Z t .0 U 'rw. a� 0 ` °c0 m O 2� V) Z O w � 0 w o 0 CD REVISIONS DRAWN 8Y: CHECKED BY. "time-, square antiques" BUILDING TYPE sign post K-3o FRAME SITE NUMBER spNawF3 bllQ fnd. rebar & cap °0 299.06 Is #6434 I powe� vault C, 298.25 p er pole j elev. = 299.72 w/u I ---- Power/light pole `► elev. 298.93 g� '��---- Z x son. sewer m.h, #1 O �00 'b 99.63 rim elev.=298.49 q x could not open _ _ t --_ ----.�. 99.0 catch basin #1 29911 2 49 rim elev. = 29 299.16 299.24 / O 6 299.14 �O a G�\ 299.66 / 298.89 �99 \ (9, �O i 01)��� \299.93 - , _\ \ 298.99 SAN. SEWER M.H. #2 RIM ELEV. = 301.37 INV. IN - 24" CONC. PIPE FROM S.E. ELEV. = 293.59 INV. OUT - 24" CONC. PIPE TO N.W. ELEV. = 2.93.41 CATCH BASIN #2 RIM ELEV. = 301.61 INV. IN - 4" CONC. PIPE FROM N. ELEV. = 297.91 -INV. IN - 6" CONC. PIPE FROM E. ELEV. = 298.91 �- INV. OUT - 8' CONC. PIPE TO S. ELEV. = 296.01 INV. OUT - 6" CONC. PIPE TO W. -L..EV. = 296.11 300.39 CATCH BASIN #1 1.5 r RIM ELEV. = 299.02 ..tom 8TTM. ELEV. = 296.97 _ �s---6" CAPPED PIPE N CATCH BASIN #3 RIM ELEV. = 301.35 1_ _.. INV. ELEV. = 289.40 10' SEWER EASEMENT-REC. #1911340 �----- son. sewer m.h. #2 rim elev. = 301.37 302`OS \ catch basin #3 \. rim elev. = 301.35 75 0 .46 B.M. ON TOP FIRE 302.11 302.26 HYDRANT -CENTER CAP 9 Gar°^ BOLT. ,\ ELEV. = 305.16 FEET 301.10 302.08 \ 301.36 CATCH BASIN #4 RIM ELEV. = 302.11 (FULL OF DIRT, RUBBLE & WATER) 301.78 c O� i ` 302.43 \ \ GpQ o� \ / 00 t.O 303.06 / fnd. rebar & cap is #6434 tx� -� fence is 0.53 N.- 10 U +u' of NE prop. car. . 79 , lr.� x 303.43 O N T LL_ x 303.35 O w z J J W f- N w 2.70 x 303.31 x 303.41 L On 1].7 g 3.05 O ado a 00 O �� W N r N 8 z x 303.47 x 303.40 Q�. P� x 303.19 O �h o + + 4.32 J�o o ,3�4.14 mac' 303. / + o° �' -10� "times sgYre antiques" 3 sign post 03.80 9(9 i0 3 303.90 x 303.18 Q,' 1 GRAPHIC SCALE ( INS) 1 inch - 10 !k LEGEND: 0 DENOTES FOUND REBAR WITH LS CAP # 6434 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 7 AND 9, BLOCK 3, WESTGATE PARK, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10 IN SAID BLOCK 3; THENCE N 89'47'08" W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, RESPECTIVELY, 501.15 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS S 89'47'08" E 175.00 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 0'12'52" W 204.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID -- LOT 7; THENCE N 40'23'05" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 7 AND 9, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH THE LINE IS ALSO _. _THE. NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EDMONDS, WAY 268.92 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE S 89'47'08" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 A DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2246005. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ELEVATIONS: BASIS IS BENCH MARK SET ON TOP OF FIRE HYDRANT AT THE CENTER OF CAP BOLT. ELEV. = 305.16 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT AREA = 15,276 SG. FT. - 0.35 ACRES CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CO. 10007 GREENWOOD AVE N. P.O. -BOX 33725 SEATTLE, WA 98133 (206) 783-7177 FAX (206) 789-5568 ZA IV 4 l ��\� . « ;1-1 / • l(�'OD PREPARED FOR LDG ARCHITECTS DWN. BY: N.A.P. DATE: 4-27-00 JOB NO.: OOOW CHKD. BY: F.W.H. SCALE: 1" - 10' SHEET 1 OF 1 3� CQ- 5 I'D t t ��cl,� 7E PJIEC DE,V .G CT R. I)EVELOP, EM SERVICE C,,IY OF fnd, rebor & cop 1.35x2.15 o°�C� � 299.06 Is /#6434 .�-� 10' SEWER EASEMENT REC. #1911340 CONN TO EXST 8 SS \ power vault fence is 0.21 S. elev. = 299.72 VERIFY LOCATION , - fnd. rebor & cop 298.25 power ale of prop. line �/u p power/light pole p p �� �y - 20' INGRESS, EGRESS EASEMENT is #6434 elev. 298.93 -- -~� +. p 1 _ choir link fence- 38:19 4.9 yo N 89'47 08 W 161.81 x son. sewer m.h. #1 - - - ���-."Z99,63 _ �. X x x /-�- �..t�..� x rim elev.=298.49 - �� x t�---_ _____ __ O� rill 4 could not open -'~ 4 00.42 - - - _ - - - - - - - - - 1 s catch basin 1 �� fence is 0. 8 N. - s�' -`•'"- fence is 0.53 N. 99.0 # chain link fence Q ae SS'.- 8' 0VE�� EAD POWER BAND TELEPHC��E LINES 8" / SS 8" SS 8" � �� o� of NE prop. car, v' 2 .49 .Irv, leg!, =-239 Q2 ISS 8 SS- I Q� Qr. 299.16 29 . o0 % PROPOSED LANDCAPING LOCKING UTILITY NOTE: 1� CONTRACTOR SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT (OVWSD) PRIOR TO START OF WATER INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL OVWSD FOR WATER LINE INSPECTION AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR SIDE SEWER INSPECTION. Aqr \ ♦ � � '� 1 3 SSCO W j / I 10 ss o �° \ -� 6"SSS, CONN ALL (/ a BREAK � a \ 3 1 01.07 PLUMBING FIXTURES x 3� .97N �-�'302. 7 RAISE EXST °G� Y 299.6 O 8" S OTHER THAN \ 2 Ss o 9 x 303.43 �ae� - / ss RIM TO 299.3 \ ♦ KITCHEN SINKS \ FG AROUND CB .a,,,,, �..... ..... -L�- 303.14 /HALLBE299.7,M1 - - -f - - - - - - --- --I NEW IE=298.0 goo. ° �� 4/ • ' 1 52LF �90 � , `�`.., 'o. 01 3x 30 , CO \ 302.02 298.89 6"DI 00.42 S� UTILITY VAULT 577-GA, �,1302 25 ep� 302.8 `�o _ e°9° G1,L - 950 GAL \ r� ss ®1.0% \ \ 3 Vph GREASE INTERCEPTOR / \ �^ T 0 BELL 01. t, fruit tree 301.FF=303.0 a CB 5 c CONN ALL # o c"6 x 3 93 19 KITCHED S�A)KS \\ 02.34 302,72 " I `r ` \ ` x 04 299.93 \ 01.32 �2 •- Y 303.35 300.14 ♦ c x 301.83 0 \ CB#2 302.39 z 21 LF /"302'74 _/ CON SIDEWAL ? \ / r 04.0% w \ `�2 ♦ ���I 30 . 1 FC1 s\� GAG oy 1?" fry it 01.52 r / / q� / / x 3 2.64 0 302.80 Dim \ v 100jill I I � � ­1 � � � � � � �� 1, 1 CB# TYPE TE IE IE CB#1® II-54" 302.0 ® 296.13(ALL) CB 2 II-48" 301.65 296.64 8"IN 296.13 30"OUT CB 3 1 301.0 297.0 CB#4 1 303.13 300.82 CB#5 1 301.36 297.48 STORMCEPTOR ® 301.7 ® 1 296.04 IN 295.96(OUT) O FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE, SEE DETAIL, OF=299.13 ® SOLID, LOCKING LID ® 900 SERIES, CONTACT CORKY LAMBERT AT 503-702-0939 FOR ORDERING REQUIREMENTS. ❑lm. 'A' GREASE INTERCEPTORS SINGLE VAULT SYSTEM 600.6000 Gallon Capacities Geer Access Openl»g6 Grow Both Skies Pretest Divider STC 900 Precast Concrete Stormce poor®Q W 300 (900 US Gallon Capacity) .25 2�. s -0.4 dial cut / O S,�s \ off Si as �P /L92�502.47 ° I PLAN VIEW Slat !� 6.80 hi !�� r rs- a, 0 I both Sides 24" Die. Locking From and Cover SEE NOTE #1 °� / n ttt---OPTIONAL Ar�ustToGrade �' 1 1 /2 Vent Pipes 3iPlaces (2 Phase on 577-GA ) STORMCEPTOR COVER 01.. 08 s \E ` °�^61 �, / W SVC 302.61 • 10" uit tree s � 300.72� 30 � � 02.21 ;�` / x 302.12 2.70 303.31 1'� - / � � AND GRATE ,� I :•;t . GRADE ADJUSTERS TO 32 \ ZF� / -� 0 -i" � I x 303.41 I I � i GRAD .5,• \ u'�� 1.9 / t'`1F%' 0 I . SUIT FINISHED �� � ��2.00 GQ s inspectla+Tee �.=-� 0 s °� 1 S_ 1 I I OUTLET j ° �-- SIGN I f J INLET -- ------ �------r---�•'r $" .'' 30"� PIPEVENT 1 °� ` ♦ �1 •s3 1 03.05-- -�- ->-__� ' . ••' I ^6 N i/ L J _ _\ 300.19 o3� 2LF-30"CMP o0 , ;r i 1 ' S y. 01.8 3 Dp ; , Tee or Elbow i VARIABLE I ss \� \ rr �N 02'` , LEVEL 0296.13 i ° ► i i Dtm•C DIA. O. fruit Y 3 98 \ 0 a Dim De I t 'c ' �'�� tre 1 1 TYP w { i i ? 2.g. ' y sO ` .� y 1 N Water Depth • 0 I I Dim "D" a �� 1_.1 170 04b \ <c.♦ --8"S o �, Cb#1 � 1 In (~) '1'4r 1, a. I 1 ( v ��s ss 16LF [ o 18LF-8"SD " 302.36 0 04 .•u: cry v� ,� cs�5.4390 N , CB#3 3 ®0.5% rn O ` Grout A6 Around Slot 4• :: 301.16 \ .>. I a 1 Both Sides a� Z V3 Length 1l3 Len c� s �� 1 ki P I ,� �U� SECTION VIEW AA All A i` 5„ • 7" 55" SECTION THRU CHAMBER NOTE 1. THE USE OF FLEXIBLE CONNEC11ONS IS RECOMMENDED AT THE INLET AND OUTLET WHERE APPLICABLE. 2. THE COVER SHOULD BE POSITIONED OVER THE OUTLET DROP PIPE AND THE VENT PIPE. 3. THIS IS A GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING. CONSULT LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 305 300 8" IN FROM- CB#5 295 dDo ' 290 w N m 0 0 /-RUBBER GASKET PER ASTM C 443 EN,LABED OUTLET CONNECTION DETAIL FINISHED GRADE 2" �N T 1P 65LF-42" Ch P LENEL 0295.63 -✓ 2LF 2L 30" MP 3C o ,JEVE L @296.13 LE J F'- Z0 z U� M dMNN Oil II II InW.IWW 0 1+00 1 +50 DETENTION CONVE' SCALE: Hl 1"= VERT- Ill- ,VV 1' OPENING i x 3t13.47 IN CURB VALLEY301.16 •� STORMCEPTOR GALLON CAPACITY 6D0 750 9 1000 1250 1500 1 1750 2000 1 2500 2M 3000 1 4000 5WO 60M UY Co. MODEL No. 577-GA 577-G-A 577-GA -GA 4484-40A 5166-CA I 5106-17A 612-GA 612-GA 612-GA 712-GA 712-GA 818-CA 818-GA DIM "A' 711 7'-0' 7'-0' V-0" V-0' it'-r 11'-r 11 12•-8' W-8' 13'-1" IS-1' le'-11' 19'-11' DIM -B" V -8' 4'-8' 4'-8" V-0' V-0.' S'-r 6'-8' 8•-r 6'-8' 8'-6' 61 8'-0' 9'-11" 9'-11" DIM "C' 7-0' r-O' r-0• 7*-2' r-2' r-2• 7'-2' 81 8'-tr 8'-0- 8'-7' s'-7' 8'-11' 10'-S" DIM 'D' 3'-6" V-3' 1 V-3' 1 4-2' V-2- 4'-4- 4•-I1' 4'-r S'-6' 6'-0- S'-0' 6'-6- 6'-2- r-r WAM 8FP1H DIM -E- T-2- S-11' 4'-11" 1 3'-10' i 4'-10' 1 4'-0' I 4•-7' 3'-10" 1 4'-9' 3'-r 4'-7' 6'-1' 1 41 S'-9' DESIGN CRITERIA NOTES: 3P3.01 i Uniform Plumbing Code -Appendix H 1. Concrete: 28 Day Compressive Strength fe = 4500 pet 1 7 ' Number Of Maass Waste Flow Retention Storage , CAPACITY 2. Reber. ASTM A-615 Grade 60 Per Peak Hour X Rate X Time X Factor IN GALLONS 3. Mesh: ASTM A 185 Grade 65 4. Design: ACI-31" Building Code 1 4 ASTM C-857'Minimrm Structural Design Loading For Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures' Wheel wl h• paving 302.74 ) +► •}• {� /� �/ 6.Fil5. lwlClean Wae Prior To'SStarWp Of System Impact Per 0 UTILJTY l A iJ L ! vV MPAJV Y 8, BRAContractor WATER ONLYand In ta tAM er Sall Pipinge CSampling r led in T� r �Q 31�r(�'^5L, I '.O. 3OX 588 ?hone t2531339.4500 separate Side Sewer. kuburn.'Nasnington )8071-0588 "ax 1253) 735-201 'ITEMS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. 5 x 303.40 - - ele = 302.87 2.68 x 302.52 __ .. 30 .77 power/light pole SIGN I o 36 CDo/, -- W.M. VERIFY EXST WM SIZE elev. = 303.14 �' _ (1 REQUIRED) 302.79 GRADE 0 ♦ \ �Er-- \ - cone. curb BA ��, U \ YO, Q ��'•Y ,a' \ catch osin #4 30 rim ev. = 302.11 \ (full of dirt, rubble \ oter) I �� \ 1 1. 1 302.47 i ASPHALT BERM APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION \ EXST , 1 u 303.19 I 6 � „times square \ anti�t ue�• oG ii sign post "� CB#4 M + --��4 32 CITY ENGINEER DATE s � 304.14� 5 8/01 REVISED PER CITY OF EDMONI L'F-8"GONG I Ito°�; 03 �`0 4/17/01 REVISED PER CITY OF EDMON[ Wy.50% 30.43 /,( IH TRAFFIC DER ss 4 i E2,27 EXST Q 30 .67 �o• 303.06 98 303.90 x 303.18 FG' ���•0' WAsy-C Q•• :-.`�' yam. for• •:,�1S18�`O'•��, • ss��NA L • .��G\� EXPIRES 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WSDOT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, 2000 EDITION. 2. CONNECT ALL ROOF DRAINS TO DETENTION PIPE SYSTEM. 3. CMP SHALL BE 16 GAGE GALVANIZED STEEL OR ALUMINUM. STEEL DETENTION PIPE SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1 COATING OR BETTER. DETENTION PIPE SHALL BE 3X1 CORRUGATIONS 16 GAGE. 4. CONCRETE 12" STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE NON -REINFORCED ASTM C-76 AND CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE (CPEP) SHALL BE SMOOTH INTERIOR PER AASHTO M252 IN 8 INCH SIZE AND AASHTO M294S IN SIZES 12 INCH THROUGH 36 INCH. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CL 52. PVC SHALL BE EQUAL TO SANITARY SEWER PIPE AS SPECIFIED BELOW. ANY PIPE DESIGNATED AS "SD" MAY BE ANY TYPE LISTED HEREIN. CPEP NOT ALLOWED UNDER TRAVELED SURFACES WITH LESS THAN 2 FEET OF COVER. 5. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034, SDR 35. 6. CALL ENGINEERING DIVISION (425-771-0220 EXT, 1326) FOR PRE BACKFILL, SIDE SEWER, WATER SERVICE AND ALL OTHER ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING FINAL INSPECTION. CALL 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 7. RESPONSIBILITY FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. MATERIAL ACCUMULATED IN THE STORAGE PIPE MUST BE FLUSHED OUT AND REMOVED FROM CATCH BASINS TO ALLOW PROPER OPERATION. THE OUTLET CONTROL ORIFICE MUST BE KEPT OPEN AT ALL TIMES. 8. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE AND ALL UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS AS REQUIRED. CALL 1-800-424-5555 FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL AT ALL TIMES UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION. ENSURE SILT DOES NOT ENTER OFF -SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED ONTO CITY STREETS. TESC MEASURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE A GUIDE. THE CITY'S INSPECTOR MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEASURES. ESC NOTES: ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED "DRAIN" W/ LOCKING BOLTS. STEPS OFFSET. ' FRAME AND COVER ELEVATION 302.0 OVERFLOW 299.13 - LIFT ROD AS SPEC. BY MFR. W/ HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN ONE FT. OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOODLOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLE. -7 6" DIA ELBOW W/ ORIFICE. DIA=1.0" 8" OUT 0 296.13 .: i�t 0 :; o 0.98" DIA ORIFICE POLYPROPYLENE 14' 6" STEPS 1. ESC Minimum Requirement - Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access sholl be, whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spoils or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. 2. ESC Minimum Requirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposeu by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not `limited to, -sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be st::bilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed or more than two days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30). 3. ESC Minimum Requirement - Protection of Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching. or by a combination. of these measures and other appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC Minimum Requirement - Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly inspected and maintained by. the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual.' 1 SIX EVD ON 10 � BOLTING ADJUSTABLE LOCK HOOK WITH LOCK SCREW 1- ROD OR TUBING, VARIABLE LENGTH SHEAR GATE SEE DETAIL 30" 295.63 !, LEVEL, 296.13 NOTES: 1. ALL STEEL PARTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED & COATED W/ ASPH PER TREATMENT 1. 2. ORIFICE SHALL BE SHARP EDGE, SHOP DRILLED. FLOW CONTROL STRUCTURE NTS 6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement - Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following (CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH INSPECTOR TO UTILIZE APPLICABLE ITEMS IN 6d though 6e): a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. 8. ESC Minimum Requirement - Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses. 13. ESC Minimum Requirement - Storm Drain Inlet Protection. All storm drain inlets made operable during construction shall be protected so that storm water runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or otherwise treated to remove sediment. 14. ESC Requirement - Removal of Temporary BMPs. All temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Trapped sediment shall be removed or stabilized on site. Disturbed soil areas resulting from removal shall be permanently stabilized FILTER FABRIC --^-- SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2'X2'WOOD OR EQUIVALENT 8'- 12' 8' PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. I FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 1_? CONTINOUS ROLLS. USE STIPPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACHI FABRIC TO WIRE. WIRE MESH SUPPORT I'E CE TO SUPPORT FILTER FA OIC. 1 !- 11 11 C �-----------------------'- i i--- Cu BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER 1 1 MATERIAL. 8 TO 1e i t ! ;.e SIT T I=s^i , E-11 sop till Ii.L,:� TTd:.Si i iTT �2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR EQUIVALENT EXCAVATE TRENCH 8' DEE0' WHERE STRAW BALES WILD BE PLACED AND STAKE BA4.ES. i TWO STAKES PER BALE TO MAINTAIN POSITION STRAW BALES AS REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE INSPECTION' ROUIRED ON :ER Q STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL, CONTROL METHODS DEFORM- OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN. ' , ,E M (j F___ EVi iON STANDARD DETAIL ' F�TER FAMIC FACIE AND MAW DAMOMFIITRAIM5 , r8DDw 1990 OA11< 5/10/99 t NTS D" NO. NJ I I �*�►S�i�Ft � �►t�'��7�1JT1 .•r.1T171'►1���.��►i w�'i►7I►r,��A7I�r,1►r�Tl�. QUARRY A7�Ij71���►17��►L\ DEEP VARIES PER RADIUS VARIES TYPE 2 CURB RAMP 5' LONG RAMP MIN.` SI DE VALK . T Lq F"'I . CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. - OR ISTING CURBING) SHALL EX. Ei D TO END or RADIUS. i EXTRUDED CURB $HALL START'; AT END Or RADIUS , I TRANSITION SLOPE SHALL' BE 1110 (TYP) TYPE I CURB RAMP 3' LONG RANG MIN, Aa LACE V WIDE 7VZIF P BEHIND START CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER CE FULL DEPTH EXPANSII3N IJOINT p t IEtdG AND C%G ARI PIORApOI EbIAa (TUNtTURB/GUTTER AND WING FOR HIGH TRAF 'IC LOAD GUTTER MAY BE POURED AS TINE t V1T, ULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL' BE PLACED IF WIDTH OF OPENING EXCEEDS I5'. CP ACP Ill ' ,4. ` ... y SECTION A SOLID, WALLS FILTER MEDIA FOR DEWATERING STANDARD b""ETAIL CATCH BASIN ,,� GRATE OVERFLO POROUS BOTTOM NOTE: THIS DETAIL IS ONLY SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN. 0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE, THE MEANS TO DEWATER THE STORED SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW, AND CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ON OR AROUND THE FILTER FABRIC PROTECTION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SEDIMENT SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITH WATER, AND ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE DISPOSED OF AS FILL ON SITE OR HAULED OFF SITE, 2. ANY SEDIMENT IN THE CATCH BASIN INSERT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS FILLED ONE-THIRD OF THE AVAILABLE STORAGE. THE FILTER MEDIA FOR THE INSERT SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED AT LEAST MONTHLY. 3. REGULAR MAINTENANCE IS .CRITICAL FOR ALL FORMS OF CATCH BASIN PROTECTION, UNLIKE MANY FORMS OF PROTECTION THAT FAIL GRADUALLY, CATCH BASIN PROTECTION WILL FAIL SUDDENLY AND COMPLETELY IF NOT MAINTAINED PROPERLY. E EXPIRES 5/14/p:5 ROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY ENGINEER DATE FRONT SIDE MAXIMUM OPENING OF GATE LIFT HANDLE SHALL BE ATTACKED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CLEANOUT/SHEAR GATE ALTERNATES ARE ACCEPTABLE PROviDED MATERIAL SPEanCATIONS ARE MET AND FLANGE BOLT WSDOT/APWA PLAN B-3 SEE TEXT SECTION INTS-10 iNT-51900998 PATTERN MATCHES. %• " Snohomish County Public Works Snohomish County, Woshington P !Gd by 4`"'lT- 6 li iNT5-190 FROP - WAR GATE DETAIL County Road Engineer Dote 1 / 5 10 20 ■■, °. ld iIw� IIIIIIIw ,IIIIIII1'.. IIIIIII' , .... 4 1 SURVEY NOTES: LEGEND: Q DENOTES FOUND REBAR WITH LS CAP # 6434 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: fnd. rebor & cap oo� 799.06 Is #6434. 1.35x2.15 10' SEWER EASEMEIJT REC, 1911340 c 1 power vault fence is 0.21 S. # oG 298.25 power pole I elev. = 299.72 of prop. line 6 \\ _ nnwar /1;nk# n to e1ev. Lyti.yJ �0'p,�D�� _`_,/ anchor00E e son. sewer m.h. #1 ^� ~99.63 � \V� rim elev.=298.49 X -- x - could not open \ �j----cotch basin #1 �- - - ° fen s v \ 2 .49 99.0 r;mplea„ = oao n9 ISS chain link 8qJ'ic SS �- 6 \ " ♦9 4 INSTALL 0 C CB INSERT THAT PORTION OF LOTS 7 AND 9, BLOCK 3, WESTGATE PARK, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 10 IN SAID BLOCK 3; THENCE N 89'47'08" W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 9 AND 10, RESPECTIVELY, 501.15 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS S 89'47'08" E 175.00 FEET FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 0'12'52" W 204.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE N 40'23'05" W ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 7 AND 9, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH THE LINE IS ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EDMONDS WAY 268.92 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE S 89'47'08" E ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9 A DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2246005. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. AREA = 15,276 SQ. FT. - 0.35 ACRES ELEVATIONS: BASIS IS BENCH MARK SET ON TOP OF FIRE HYDRANT AT THE CENTER OF CAP BOLT. ELEV. = 305.16 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FOOT TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING A CITY .ENGINEER APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE: x 299.66 / ss ♦ � sr 4- -- 298.89 � J Q 00.42 ss �0 01. loop. Sr�Q `� SS ♦ .1 'T,e fruit tree c �o o')c ?1 � 299.93 \ SS \ i 300.25 'r�� s � IS, \ 01.08 4-_q n" S 1. Arrange and attend preconstruction meeting with City of Edmonds Inspector. 2. Arrange and call for existing utility locations. 3. Review ESC notes. 4. Flag clearing limits. 5. Install filter fence. 6. Install construction entrance. 7. Install CB protection in existing CB's as shown. 8. Reference stabilization of exposed area requirements. 9. Perform clearing and grading. 10. Install utilities. 11. Provide CB protection (new CB's) immediately after installation of storm drains. 12. Seed or surface disturbed areas. 13. Remove silt fences after site has been stabilized and the City's Inspector has approved the removal. 2 � ' Y FACE OF CURB = CLEARING 41MIT ` ALONG R/W F ONTAGE �\ ss Y \SILT FENCE BEHIND WALK �, ss EXn C13 TE=301.61 IE=295� (12"OUT) INSTALL \ TESC CB INSERT JIL I _- fnd. rebor & cop RENT FENCE y is #6434 chain link fence •-- ^�v X ) ---- X_• °1 mo, �"'--- fence is 0.53 N. LANDCA S 8" SS 8" I Q° °��� of NE prop. car. I 4rH WY SW a 1Mt �V) C '. >c 302.85 302.79 �" �i 1 �" 3 �� >< 303.43 .141 CY < 226TH ST SW tip-- Wy SW Sw rH Q4sw d'cc CL - ° 303.14 -7 Cn2267t� PL S�! S o 226TH IN/ �,Q M ead'Iq e OODWAY a I SW 2277H < P L %P o L rn 22 7TH \ / 302.02 228TH ST c 5 �> (M 4 228TH 10600 TERIreD 9600 \ 302.25 QQ� 1302.8228TH = PL SWP SIT. cv SW EDM Fes- C 1 ' -1 ST SW SNO232ND oRDBI303.35 AD Z FRIAR C, 30 1 I RD � ,c 302.80 ROOST RD) 0 'w I --PA = CLEARING LIMIT o I TYP 302.61 2.70 x 303.31 u 303.41 i son, sewer m.h. # rim elev, = 301.37 \ s � \ catch basin #3 i\ � ST m elev. = 301.35 - STALL I I- N :SC CB INSERT �-M. ON TOP FIRE HYD ANT -CENTER CAP BOLT. ELEV. 305.16 FEET --✓� ss ALL CB INSERT \ ss 100' STRUCTION -x 303.40 - - x 303.19 �o "times square antllue sign post v 113 -�( 4.32 1\°' 03. M4.14,F 303.90 Gq� x 303.18 P� 3: ST W J d EDMONDS- WOODWAY c\I yS C 236T1 a; 3t TO C�UUNTY �, < .231.ST PL / �E 232ND i rn PL SW 232ND ST SW F 2.33RD ST SW 234TH n ST a SW 9700 .1 �,'��/ F- :3 3:tr CL 2 3 6T.H 4� 236TH < 4 .� Cv 1 PL SW 01999Tromasi ATZ FOR NSTRUCTION �//YL CITY ENGINEER DATE EXPIRES 5/14/D� �s / / 3.06 / //.