No preview available
1015 GLEN ST (2).pdfCITY OF EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE e Fli # DATE _ _f0/�.-2. D FEE S-.d"L� RECT E a 7 7 APO' S HEARING DATE: APPLICANT -' scd:Gc �G�"%�✓ ADDRESS CITY & ZXP � r? � f��t PHONE /r'7%,f ' D .201F, 1-14 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPE�R/T�Y LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 1O1,.5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY .-, . , , i _ Z' it -a- VARIANCE REQUESTED: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY USE ZONE: - LU t ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) a ignature of Applicant,Owner, o Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an for the Stat�e,,,,��'�,,,�� of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared / who, being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (S)hf has prepared and read the attached statements and has acknowledged to me that the recititations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this of 19 re! . Notary Public i n for Late of Washington, residing at OCT ,,,'u M1 DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answe all'questions 1. What are the physical charact:ristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a Hardship for you in regard to development of your property? 2. How does yzlr. property differ from other property in the same vicinity? 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? 4.a,What hardships will result t you if the variance is not granted? h,Will the hhardships have ben caused by your own action? a 1 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? Pah Retard of ndinas of fact by Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of f ` File No. !%��'� request for variance at f©� the following: 1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are in the file. f 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/Wv#V +wt been met. ' 3. In addition that 4. Therefore, the request for variance is.Aewied/Granted, subject to the following special conditions: t is ot ned S. Section 12.1G.110 11---- ertand within oneyearfromithendate ofor cthen0oard'sidecisnon 8theifor the subject property con- ditional use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void.---" 6. Decision shall be effective on: Date DATED' c+�lry ,�� ti/.>?�'O C ai an, oard a ustment DATA Date of Application: i ���'��O Date of Nearing: Date of Publication: Continuances: Date of Posting: Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board: ecretary, oard o ustment LOT ORV ti 1 'r b � CiDNS�cWGT►n' 1�R•M�"tIED ►N 'S�"13p�et.K. Wtt" , } Cc ro l (iJc r o t -94;&q 5f i 1 r ' `gyp / 0 Ve fii S �` • /�iY S� /t%I^S, CGl ,, J � Q.0 .. .. io /6 G I dI4 5 f 1Ed, Pa 1�iy"it �...._1-1 /DPJ6clt^v% 11%I IA-10u!rt^c� r /D,., i; 1 `•._c 1 2,Rmp ti X I. tj rr O�Lq lll�- UOT 2 2 Pah ~ NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE - 9QU0nI0m=X=*=n ` BY EDM0NDG BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ' ^ i ` ' | All interested persons are hereby notYfied'tha| Wednesday, the ` -19th , day of November 19 80 , has been set as the -_ for hearing re~`'~' filed `^~ by James R. Watson forvariance ' ' ' � ' .requimd,twenty foot front setback` Glen ' ` said property being ` ^ ` ' | ' Saidhearing will .be at 7:30 P.M.in the Council Chambers of the 'Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. lRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds ` - . .. ' V~35-8O FILE NO: .` N 0 PUBLISH: N0 |w @ |� G STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, Affidavit of Publication The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news- paper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snoho- mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper b order of the Superior has been approved as a legal newspaper y ,i4 , •"V, Court of Snohomish County, and that the notice ..............................».,.. NOTICE OF HEARING 4 ......... ......... .. .» it` t • �p.tqom' j N e ................ -. a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and i. entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: NOV. 3, 1980:' •......»,..........._....................................................................................................». . 4..: -.........»......................».............»»........................................................»...................... and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. ....................................................... rk .............................................................,.........rk 5 � Principal Cles;: f ' i 4th:: t Subscribed and sworn to before me this NOVEMBER80 dayof ................ ... »...... 19...».... t: »».,........ .. ........ .......... ............................... ..... Nota blic in and for the State of Washington, resi n at Everett, Snohomish County. S-2-1 ., lit i FILE NO. V-35-80 APPLICANT James Watson ; AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON } r .ss . ., COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) Maryanne Townsend being first duly sworn, on oath deposes andsays: / That on the ! t.. day of 1 C`h1+Z �-� > 19 O, the attached Notice of Public of Hearing was mailed as requiredtoadjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. Signed E Subscribed and sworn to before me this / h _day of Z-n2G'L'.e 4,-� 191'). iotary Public in and for the State of Wash* gton Residing at�cJG FILE NO. V-35-80 APPLICANT James Watson. N AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } ss, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) Hank Lewis being first duly sworn, E on oath deposes and says: I That on the C,v� day of the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, E x and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applic- able, on or near the subject property. f4 s Signed a� Subscribed and sworn to before me #his,,,,Zl day of 1906 No ary ublic In and for the State of 'Washington residing a#�'�''� -------------- OF i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �, /� / ♦ tWILL HOLD Ala Jold 99 ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO., THE PROPERTYADDRESS AND LOCATION! lr oq ZONE DISTRICT THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT • + M. , IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 505 BELL STREET, EDMONDS (PHONE 775-2525, EXT. 227). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE WARNING! 0 TCHE EALMENT HEARING IS AIMISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. ftA THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER T CUWAY MESSAGE TO Q 1� i I.r � p� FROM �. SUBJECT: Oct %ti"e�..I ew,. r� 4{�v.cv�., '.�� ti.a ., •�5....e .t-� DATE L/ M E � lz�e s .I A G 980 ommuniiY De v 1� Deb;+ SIGNED R E P I Y DATE: SIGNED CITY OF EOMONOS CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 90020 • (206) 775.2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: November 12, 1980 T0: Mr. James R. Watson 1015 Glen Street Edmonds, WA 98020 TRANSMITTING: Planner's Variance Review Form RE:. V-35-80 I I I AS YOU REQUESTED: FOR YOUR INFORMATION: XX AS WE DISCUSSED: FOR APPROVAL: FOR YOUR FILE: REVIEW AND COITIENT ' COMMENT AND RETURN: MINUTES OF MEETING: ;N REMARKS: PLANNING DIVISION 'PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM FILE # V-35-80 APPLICANT: James R. Watson ADDRESS: 1015 Glen Street ZONING: RS-6 VARIANCE REQUESTED: Variance of eight feet from the required twenty foot front setback ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT: Twenty foot front yard setback OTHER PERTINENT FACTS: There is a 60' right-of-way in front of this property with 12' being undeveloped fronting this property. VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100 1. Does this amount to a rezone? No. 2.(a) Are there conditions and/or circumstances not generally applicable to other lands in the same district? Yes, the home was built in 1932. Sub- sequent platting and street improvements made home non -conforming. (b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? No. 3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant? No, see item 2a. 4. Are there unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the zoning code? No. 5. Will the granting of the variance be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of property owners in the vicinity? No. _ 6. Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land? Yes. 7. Will the granting of the variance generally be in harmony and compatible with this zoning code? No. However, there is 12 feet of unimproved right-of-way _that in essence izives them a 24 foot setback STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. Planner's Variance Review 12/77 =I .X . November 12, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department FROM: Engin eying Division SUBJECT: ENGINLERING COMMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER 19, 1980 LOT lM-M-s4-60 BOARDIOF ADJUSTMENT MEETING D mo 1 The Engiie�ering D visi0p.6f/PUb1ic,Works has the following co ents to offer 0erUSh1.ng to the' goaring: ,scheduled for the November 19, 1980 Board of Adjustme t meeting: ? AGENDA y V-34-80 LAUD CE F EEBU 'Varia 194 feet from the required ten eta I 19TI12n lue West. (RS-12) 1� The crive by he applicant ap ea s to be private and not for easement is centered p is use the no A .fi th. pro -flOo rtiy will Lary i n& � wo nd l d storm sewer not be �'ed affected by this acts '-' JAMS R. SON' - arianc a ght feet from ie. equired twen foct front etback 10 RS 6) 4 a�r usrcd Engineering has no ob'.ect o to his variance. froNr �etbtak- i V-36-$0 ONS CTION oe`2fram th ai r Twe-54 eaa 0815.76 est. (KIRK) • `:�; This prop wo other acti ns hftWaAcc.K. have been heard y,the time this variance is considered. he re +gym t on PP of the applicant is. that .subdivision of Lot 9 t two lots ill h2;994rAWCS approved, thu-s' 10 tan" nggto ave no objection to thiaction-only if the'fol.lowing conditions are et: =xis? L�rb -1. hat thd'.subdivision of, <-9 provides an acc ss easement _ 6.ih-.=Avenue' •West ,�f�l� .this-tuh3�t.-eas.ter••ly a-ot-,-...-_.__ _ .� 2. That the''driveway width on 76th Avenue West be 24 feet minimum. �11.114A� w wow �1 - ;.i � 4rorvt tye��aark- f '� r _ t 1 X November 12, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: ENGINEERING COMMENTS FOR THE NOVEMBER 19, 1980 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING The Engineering Division of Public Works has the following comments to offer pertaining to the hearing scheduled for the November 19, 1980 Board of Adjustment meeting: AGENDA V-34-80 . LAURENCE FREEBURN - Variance of five°feet frw the 'required ten feet at 19005 92nd Avenue West. (RS-12) The driveway easement shown by the applicant appears to be private and not for public use. A five-foot wide sanitary and storm sewer easement is centered on the north property line also and would not be affected by this action. V=35-80 JAMES R''WATSON`="Variance ofeight feet.from,the required twenty foot front setback at 1015 Glen Street. (RS-6) Engineering has no objection to this variance. V-36-80 P.J. CONSTRUCTION - Variance of four feet from the required twenty foot rearyard setback at 20815 76th Avenue West. (RMH) This property is the subject of two other actions that will have been heard by the time this variance is considered. The presumption of the applicant is that subdivision of Lot 9 to two lots will have been approved, thus making this variance necessary. Engineering would have no objection to this action only if the following conditions are met: 1. That the subdivision of Lot 9 provides an access easement to 76th Avenue' West ,for this subject easterly lot. 2. That the driveway,yn dth on 76th Avenue West be 24 feet minimum. HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CITY OF EOMONOS CIVIC CENTER . EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9D020 . (206)775.2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: December 16. 1980 61 Mr. Hatzenbuhler was in favor oofastorage,aandlMrJ. Medinawhich added thatthe noted would give another 144 sq• MRS. MEDINA MOVED, intrusion into the setback then would be only VARIANCE F SECONDED By RS'THAT BEAPPROVED WITH SAMINIMUMVARIANCE BECAUSESHEBELIEVEDTHAT WA INTRUSION INTO THEE78A WI'DiHWpT�.D NOT BE HARMFUL MOTION CARRIED,TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND SHE SAW NO OTHER PROBLEMS V-35-80 JA�MESR. WATSONVariance of 8' from the required 20' front setback at ,d(RSfi) h is There is a 60' right-of-way in front ofT hiswould not�amount fto acrezone. undeveloped and fronts this property. and street improvements The home was built n rmin anStricteenforcent ement�of the Zoning Codeher would made the home nonconforming• not deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by in the same disc ct. The special cond'cant- wTheremwere ade tno unnecessary did not result from actions of the app out the provisions of the hardships e, practical ng ofctheies in variancerwould not be detrimental tlewhe Zoning Code, and granting health, safety, or welfare of property owners in the vicinity. use of felt this was the minimumvariance toceagenke erallylwould sbeabneharmony with land. He felt grantingere so essentially the to wZonin Coe,den the Code, deet ahe pied thatlize unimprovedrrdight-of-way, so essentially nee a 24y' setback is Provided. He recomMr.mended atatedal at the Enof the pjneering He showed slides of the property. Division had no objection. the hearing was opened to the pub }c. The applicant said he he was the homeadding oin ithe no954 rththeofelt swidening itonloo the front would improve the appearance. r. Don Westlin, architect, 19020 Highraend9�and�hehthought thee had dsketchwith Mshown Watson through a mutual building portion t of the house that sits 2' was.a little in error /21 as the existing room to the left extends some 2 l2' to the south, so there is some existing ch in cliser top he street arather and therefore there is not tl.htheurelated. The He applicant added that the landscaping gives the illusion that the house is farther back than it is- Nclosedelse wished to speak, and the public portion of the hearing was Mr. Hatzenbuhler felt this was a reasonable way to improve the appearance of the house. Mr. Leraas said it would be compatible with the neighborhood. MR. CERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. MEDINA, TO APPROVE V-35-80 AS THE VARIANCE THE HOSETHAT ADY REQUESTED IS.ONLY AND TENS WITHIN IMPR VEMENTSXISTING SUG ESTEDUBY THEEAPPLICANTEARE IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE OD AND NOT BE DETRIME SAFETY, AND WELFARE OFITHE �NEIGHBORHOOD. L MOTION CARRIEDNTAL TO THE HEALTH, V-37-80 MR. & dwe W. E. WISE VarianceSfrom(ddensity allowed in an RMH zone for 528 Pi.i th The lot area required for fife units in nothe RMH zone Thisuld not amounts to�a06rezoneftand and this site was short 150 sq. there were no conditions not generally applicable to other lands in the same district. Strict enforcement of the Zoning Code would not indthe�samehe property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by district. There were no unnecessary hardships in carrying out the provisions of the Zoning Code. Granting of the variance would result in relatively minor impact to the neighborh000wnerwould not tvb detrimey. ntal to the health, safety, or welfare of property and compatible with variance that would make passible reasonable insharmonye land. Granting of the 150 sq. ft. variance would be generally the Code, and notedrthatwis allrunt sewouldahavevundergroundal. The tparking as BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 2 - November 26, 1980