The URL can be used to link to this page

1026 CASCADE LN.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII 10552 1026 CASCADE LN O 0� TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: O�ML SS DD D o 1400 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): f ?a `b 052kk,5M) COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS `� DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:' I I II EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: UST I t I PERMITS ( PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: .� SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: g T SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: I' OTHER: LATEMP\DST's\Forms\.Street File Checklist.doc ir p .o v _ _ - a + v- USE REKNIT l.DNE eS-17� NVMBER o,� , CITY OF EDMONDS a - — - CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION VL OWNEn NAME/NAME OF o: RIPTION CHECK SUBFDaIV`iJJIO—=KNOL. L LID r• .�%/— �Y!:, °' MAILING ADDRES RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. / TESCO e PUBLIC APPROVED BY o �4o o� ° CITY � x Lr O��Af TELEPHONE NUMBER ' '/ (� %2 R/ (RED DEDICATION—_- PROPOSE DIV1I��H 3 0 0 W/7 Fb - NAME �� tat CQn`'An V VC• 1A1i-G-- RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED. • e ° ° ° •j ° I w ADDRESS i ".L 11 l` 3 C% SU1`�P.i 1✓ STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED. LT SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED 1 • a I ¢, TELEPHONE NUMBER 712 CITY My S6SE4 REMARKS t �``•, , :•, 6 .a mo& NAME •/•Ri !f. fl;, �WA �7l+i9V E/1'h� CA�W6 �rs� 17aiIccr = O'7J/ TC/•I�/l/• i7 METER y7.E /, 3/ y BUILD() VPLY 512E (FIXTURE U iT5 - ,//// ° a ° b ' g 0 'n D r ¢ ZO CITY TELEPHONE�jNU/M7BER W I y STATE LICENSE NUMBER •O ', D° �O �o 0. SIGN AREA ALLOV.'ED PRORo^'D _ ENV, REVIEW COMPLETE ADD No—, E%EMP'• - snoREUNE# .. �",ke; '- Lega Description of Property - Include all easements D ° (show below or attach two copies) ?° F o u VARIANCE OR CU (PLANNING RE IEW BY DATE lI;;: --a. o 4° a O n o J u`Oi SETBACK �/ FRONT BLS/ SIDE. V REAR HEIOHT LOT COVERADE y% , 00 - y T f REMARAS e. ' NEW RESIOENTUL PLUMBING ° m � ADOiALTER � COMMERCIAL ❑ MECHANICAL NN UQ -° I•' - - -n P 1 APT, BLUG. n LJ SIGN 'FPS y ° REPAIR EXCAVATE ❑ FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CO STRUCTION CODE,�� HEIGHT - Yl 4 oom i_.l DEN. LISH 09 FILL I—K—FT) �1� I `• (�J Ae '9 CA CRTSWIM REMODEL GARAGE L SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA REQUIRED OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT' �'7 Z LOAD IL ...J •� �'.' - d°o WOOD STOVE( RETAINING WALL/ INSERT ROCKERY 11 RENEWAL ❑YES .: NO REMARKS `` _ - °' °0 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 v� . NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF p�� A1ALONSIII DC° 91,44 ^• b ID� -° BO M DWELLING E UNITS D�` \ t NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLANT F` ,<"?:'- •'' q� O o• (�� t eS IciP,tnc2. VALUATION FEE ,. D PLAN CHECK FEE V t r o0•D - BUILDING S-OQ87 P $ PLUMBING MECHANICAL G+�� o I This Permit ;river s work to be done or, private property ONLY. cRADINOrFILL ° Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewAlks, � ° ° dfIVOWay3, mDrq UECS, Olo.) will IBQUIre Separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE _ b y 1 ¢r° Permit Application; 180 Days ENER GYCODE S Rr 8- a Permit Limit: 1 Year. Provided Wort{ is Started Within 180 DayS - "Applicant, on behalf of his Or her spouse, heirs, assigns and v successors in interest, agrecs to indemnify, tletend and hold &_!• -`'•- °p`o° ° W o harmless the City of Edmonds, WashinglOA, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of Q. ,?a a° oo z wh-a''vee nature, arising deer lly or indirectly from the issuance this 1. Issuance Of this permit Shall not be deemed M ° PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT •✓ � ' } - fF ` �� ° o of pC.•T motldy, waive or reduce any requirement of any City ordinance nor limn in auy way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ' _ ?° ab' d Provision." .- —0 ? �. I hereby acknowbdgo that 1 Lr•/e read this application; that the information given is Correct; and that I am the owner. or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL .0 authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and 9 THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until '.4•� o' ° g° Stale laws regulating construction; and in doing the work autho. AUTHORIZES THE signed b the Build;n OfIICI81 or his 9 Y 9 d; � ° ' 0 0 •o Ed thereby, no Person will be employed in viviation Of the Labor Code I the State of Wet hington re:ating to Workmen's Compenea- ONLY WORK NOTFD Deputy: and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. 'P°' lion Urance. INSPECTION DEPAR'MLN• :,0}wI(• - _ I RE w ER OR AC I r_IAIE JIG D d^' • I CITY OF OFFICIAL'S SIGNAT DATE /?{, ° ~ •o a ° ATTENTION 771-39 RELE D BY: D TE I Slfj '7�25 �- IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. CHAPTER 3. IIBC° PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor, J. 6;, ' o. n ° t • Ib: 87 ,A•E. � t: df 00 Q °(/lP '7( t'P °°• ,•8��'oAA°wd F,S, °tiS' p,°o'6°�0 •tl:� ri, e yid Q(o 4' SO Wyi•Pa� I00A��4 <O I .%!"Y ""�^l.r e,`"dy (`UA - � - .. °o ° b ° L`p ':t`�' • R�. _; •C• $ a0 - ° D .8. oo_ � •: y%.'E`t •' ,. � o . b 7 Y ° ° o o � o G^•'�•Pa '"�jiM1t• - AiI � - Ay a oo O ",It))'. µtllll4.F.P '. '. x' °t D. I - y i C�, [ VV ST. FILE / CATCH 13t�SJW CASCATJE LANE s7 , HE"I GHT CA'LCS A t 11.17 C = 71.10 o = 77.-70 TOTAL 34(-•87 = • y a 44.1Z NEAW9VB1. `f"�SOa 124. 2A H Ax H.r W �E s 9C4LE: 1"- 10=0 S1TEr PLAN) LEC�st SEE AiiAC NEB r. RECI�-:I 11 E:® AN1G1� � PERMIT COUNTER STPIET FILE, STREET F SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT STREET FILE COTTINGHAM RESIDENCE Edmonds, Washington � 89as�8 PREPARED FOR Mr. Rodney Cottingham PROJECT NO. 8906-20G JUNE 267 1989 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC 911 - 5th Avenue, Suite 100, Kirkland, WA98033 (206) 827-7701 ROCK TRENCH DETAIL Building footing to be centered in trench and bear on compacted rock backfill allowable bearing capacity = 2000 PSF r- I I 1 � I I L _ `/` U Slope trench walls as required 0 to prevent sloughing �Oo00� O p le Clean 2-4 inch crushed rock backfill See note 3 Medium dense, natural undisturbed soil in trench bottom See note 2 Minimum trench width See note t General Notes: Depth to bearing soil varies. Required depth to be determined by the field engineer 1. The minimum trench bottom width is 4 feet, wider trenches may be required as designated by the geotechnical engineer. Trench widths are determined based on the required trench depth and soil conditions, generally, deeper trenches require greater width. 2. Visual verification of suitable bearing, soil in the trench bottom by the field engineer is required. Seepage may have to be pumped from trench so that the bearing level can be visually determined. 3. Rock backfill is to be placed and compacted to achieve a tightly compacted mass. Compaction may be achieved using a "HOEPAC" compactor or by tamping with the backhoe bucket. 4. Permanent drainage of the trench is required. Drainage may be accomplished by sloping the trench bottom to a common point and collecting the seepage in a 4 inch diameter, rigid PVC perforated pipe. Drainage should be tighlined to an approved discharge point. Cottingham Residence Edmonds, Washington A&MASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC i SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT COTTINGHAM RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON July 3, 1989 Project No. 8906-20G I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION FThis report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic, and geotechnical engineering study for the proposed 01 single family residence in Edmonds, Washington. The proposed residence location and approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the residence are plannedhe conclusions and recommendations contained in this report sh u�ldtbe reviewed and modified or verified as necessary. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be utilized in the design and development of the above mentioned project. Our field study included excavation of exploration pits and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution and physical properties of the subsurface soils. Engineering studies were also conducted to determine the type of suitable foundation, allowable bearing pressures, anticipated settlements, floor support recommendations and drainage considerations. This report summarizes our current field work and offers development recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Rodney Cottingham. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal dated June 8, 1989. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Rodney Cottingham and his agents, for specific application to this project, in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering No other warrant geology practices. findings, and conclusions expressed e or means toidentify andrreducevrisks. 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION This report was completed with an understanding of the project based on design concepts developed by Charles C. Lee, dated May 8, 1989. Present plans call for a two-story, wood -frame residence with 2 masonry fireplaces. The living areas may utilize either crawl space or slab -on -grade floors. The garage will utilize a slab -on -grade floor. The finish floor elevation for the lower level is understood to be planned near the existing site elevation. The site was situated immediately west of 1028 Cascade Lane, in Edmonds, Washington. The lot is roughly rectangular, measuring approximately 165 feet north -south by 80 feet east -west. There is a gentle westward slope on the parcel with an approximate 2-3 foot elevation change across the proposed house footprint. Most of the site is covered with lawn grass with several alder trees located at the south end of the lot. No standing or flowing water was observed on the ground surface at the time of our exploration. A corrugated metal drainage culvert runs diagonally beneath the lot, flowing from near the southeast corner and daylighting near the northwest lot corner, where it flows into a small stream that roughly parallels the west property boundary. At the time of our exploration, approximately 3 inches of water was flowing in this culvert. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included excavating a series of 4 exploration pits to gain information about the site. The various types of soils as well as the depths where the soils or characteristics of the soils changed are indicated on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where soil conditions changed may represent gradational variations between soil types in the field. Our exploration pits were approximately located in the field by measuring from house corner stakes placed by the contractor. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the 4 exploration pits completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations were completed within proposal constraints. Because of the nature of elploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It. should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 2 Each of the pits penetrated between 5 and 8-1/2 feet below present ground surface and permitted direct, visual observation of subsurface conditions. The materials encountered in the exploration pits were studied and classified in the field by a geotechnical engineer. All exploration pits were backfilled immediately after examination and logging. Selected samples were then transported to our laboratory for testing as necessary. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions on the lot were inferred from field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site and review of applicable literature. As shown on the field logs, the exploration pits generally encountered fill materials overlying natural deposits of sand and gravel. Minor amounts of peat were also encountered in some locations. 4.1 Stratigraphy Fill soils (those not naturally placed) were encountered in all of the exploration pits. The fill ranged in thickness from 2 to 5-1/2 feet in EP-4 and EP-2, respectively. As noted on the exploration logs, the fill consisted of loose, dry to damp, grey to brown, fine sand with organics, trace to some silt, and minor amounts debris. It is understood from the adjacent homeowner that the fill material was imported years ago from a nearby residential development. It appears that no documentation is available to define the previously existing ground surface topography. The specific nature, extent, and uniformity of such materials are uncertain and unpredictable. Natural soils beneath the fill materials consisted for the most part of medium dense to dense, moist to wet, grey sand and gravel, with trace to some silt. With depth, these materials typically become denser. In EP-1, an approximate 6 inch thick peat layer was found beneath the fill soils, overlying the natural sand and gravel deposits. 4.2 Hvdrology Ground water seepage was encountered in all of our exploration pits at the time of our field study. The depth of seepage ranged from 3- 1/2 feet to 5-1/2 feet and probably indicated a perched condition. The ground water probably originates from surface water infiltrating uphill (east) of the site. Seepage may also occur at random depths and locations in unsupervised or non -uniform fills. It should be noted that fluctuations in the level of the ground water may occur due to variations in rainfall or time of the year. 3 0 July 3, 1989 Project No. 8906-20G II. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 5.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel is suitable for the proposed single family residence development. Since the bearing stratum lies at depth in most areas, a deepened foundation will be necessary. Rock —trenches; bearing-_oan the:---underlyin.g= med: u�m_-den-s_e-_sand=-and-gr_ave1==sed_imerits-,--as-described her ein.,=.-.m'ay_-be- ,used�f:or __suppor_t:-- of --a -conventional--spread footing- •fou`iida t ion 6.0 SITE PREPARATION Prior to site development, it is understood that the existing drainage pipe that crosses the site will be re-routed around the house footprint. It is understood that plans for this re-routing are being prepared by a civil engineer. Since the site is currently clear of trees and brush, site preparation should be minimal, involving removal of the upper sod layer and.leveling, as necessary. If possible, site preparation and foundation construction should be timed to take advantage of seasonally dry weather. This will reduce the potential for saturation and disturbance of the site soils and simplify construction procedures. 7.0 FOUNDATIONS Except for the southwest portion of the house, the depth of unsuitable fill soils encountered in our exploration pits is up to 5-1/2 feet. In most areas a deepened foundation will be necessary to provide suitable building support on the lower, medium dense, natural sand and gravel sediments. Generallv, this may be accomplished by either extending the footings to bear directly on the natural sediments or by utilizing rock trenches. Due to the potential for seepage and caving to occur over the time period that a deep footing excavation must stand open, and the sensitivity of the natural sediments to disturbance by construction activity, d;e;e:pe_n_ed_ f_ooa _n_gs=-are _n:o_t- rvecom_me_nd_e_d _Th_e__alt_e_rn_a_t=ive_;__r�ck •t_re:n_ch-es�have been utilized with favorable success in many soil types around the Puget Sound area. Geiser-ally=,-=the_-.tree-ches_-s_h_ould ha_ve-a=m:i.riimum w_idt-h=of=9- fee -tom (or as designated by the Field Engineer/Engineering Geologist) and be excavated down to the medium I dense natural soils. Because of the potential for caving, the actual trench width may be greater than specified. It would be appropriate to backfill the trenches as the excavation proceeds to minimize caving. The use of a larger, track -mounted backhoe with a flat cutting edge on the bucket will greatly speed trench excavation over the use of a conventional, rubber -tired backhoe. To determine when suitable bearing has been achieved and to verify proper rock placement, t=he=Geotech=n=ical--= Eh:g:in,e-er=/:Engiriee:rn"g Geol-og-is-t-_must--be—pre-sent--on--a—full time basis--during--footing--trenc-h. exc-avafti=on-and7-backf ll� A pump may be required to control seepage so that the bearing level can be visually determined. After the bearing stratum has been reached, the trench should immediately be backfilled. We recommend the use of 2 inch or larger size crushed rock for backfill. If desired, smaller sized crushed rock may be utilized for backfill of the upper 1 foot of the trenches to make final grading and form -work installation easier. The crushed rock must be tamped into place to achieve a tightly -packed mass; this may be done with either a "Hoepac" type compactor mounted on the backhoe or with the bucket of the backhoe itself. Staging areas should be maintained so that the rock is not contaminated by mud prior to placement in the trench. Equipment access to trench locations should also be maintained. Spread footings may be used for building support when founded on the near -surface medium dense natural soils (in the southwest area of the house) or rock trenches properly constructed and bearing on the lower sand and gravel. The deck footings and supports for the cantilevered eating area should also be supported by the lower sand and gravel either by extending the footings to the natural sediments or excavating pits at the footing locations and filling them with rock. Footings-_which-_bear--on---approved --rock-tr-enches--ma=y-Jbe---des- g-ned for —an- al--lowab.le==_be:arin.g,_pres-sure-_=_of— 2.- 000_-_ps_f: including._-bot:h=-dead and`live-loads.==-An_-in_crease__of =on_e-.third _may-_be-used_--for-__-short_-te_rm wind"=or s:e-i-smi-c==1o_adi.Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. Interior footings need only extend 12 inches below adjacent grade. However, all footings or rock trenches must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum and no footing should be founded in or above loose, organic, or existing fill soils. In- addition,1=1� f.00t-ings—should—have-a-m:inimum_,width= es. Anticipated settlement of footings founded on medium dense natural sediments or approved rock trenches should be on the order of 1 inch. However, disturbed material not removed from footing trenches prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All areas where footings will bear on native soils should be inspected by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. prior ,to placing concrete, to verify that the bearing soils are undisturbed and consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Such 5 51 1 1* 0 0 inspection may be required by the governing municipality. Perimeter footing drains should be provided as discussed under Section 9.0, Drainage Considerations. 11 8.0 FLOOR SUPPORT The loose fill soils encountered in the building area can 14 potentially undergo long term consolidation if a slab -on -grade floor or significant quantities of fill are placed over them. This consolidation could result in cracking and subsidence of the floor. For this reason, we recommend that the living areas of the house utilize crawl space construction. In the garage area, where crawl space construction is not possible, and some slab cracking may be tolerated, a slab -on -grade floor may be utilized. To reduce the amount of floor settlements and cracking, the slab should be supported on a minimum 1 foot thick layer of pit run gravel compacted with a vibratory roller. After the gravel layer is placed and compacted, a moisture barrier and 4 inch capillary break layer consisting of washed granulithic material or pea gravel should be placed. The floor slab can then be cast on top of the capillary break layer. The floor slab should not be connected to the foundation but should be free to settle independent of footings. 9.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All footing walls should be provided with a drain at the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, PVC pipe enclosed in a pea gravel, sand -free trench. They should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the building. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system but should be handled by a separate tightline drain. Rock trenches may be used in lieu of perforated pipe drains provided the rock is not contaminated with mud and the trenches can drain by gravity from the building area. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to .walls should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. Although not present at the time of our exploration, shallow ground water and runoff may enter the site from the east during the wet seasons. If site development and foundation construction are to proceed during the wetter seasons, it may be prudent to install an interceptor drain along the upper, east perimeter of the building area. The interceptor drain should consist of a 1 foot wide trench with a 4 inch diameter, rigid, perforated, PVC pipe at the bottom. The pipe should be bedded in pea gravel and filled full height with free -draining gravel or washed rock. The trench should be as deep as possible and still allow gravity discharge to the lower, west side of the lot. 0 Thank you for this opportunity to be of service. We trust our findings, conclusions and recommendations will be helpful in the successful completion of your project. Should you have any questions or require further assistance, please feel free to contact US. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Bruce L. Blyton; Geotechnical engineer T.� Gary T. obdell, P.E., P.G. Principa BLB/lb A906-20G DK6/10/89 lb L e0 IMP`, WAS 0pi � /�c�o <.10 is . o tv �D,��AFC15Tt � AL z SS/ANEI1 7 FIGURE 1: SITE AND EXPLORATION SKETCH . COTTINGHAM RESIDENCE 1 I I oEP-1 aEP- P-2v I Approximate Scale \ Proposed Residence vEP-3 I � 1 Property line Cottingham Residence Edmonds, Washington. EXPLANATION v EP-1 Exploration Pit Approximate Location Approximate Location of Drainage Culvert (to be relocated) 4EMASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCESsINC 8906-20G ' June 1989 1 [31P �NUMBOER EP-1 5- 10- EXPLORATION PIT LOGS SEDIMENT DESCRPTk M Loose, damp, grey/brown, fine sand with some silt. Loose to medium dense, damp, grey and dark brown gravelly silt and sand with minor roots and w000d debris. (Fill) Soft, moist, very dark brown, organic laden silt and peat with some gravel, strong organic odor. Medium dense to dense, moist to wet, grey, sand and gravel with trace to some silt. BOH 82' Note: Seepage and caving below 4' depth NUMBER EP-2 0 5 10 15 arn0mcs" rW&^n arW%" Loose, dry, grey/brown, fine sand with trace to some silt. (Fill) Loose to medium dense, moist, very dark brown and grey mixed, sand and silt with some organics and debris. (Fill) Medium dense to dense, moist to wet, grey, sand and gravel with trace of silt. BOH 7' Note: Slow seepage and caving below 52' depth Cottingham Residence Edmonds, Washington. ASSOCIATEO EARTH SCIENCES, INC 8906-20G ' June 1989 ' 13 ,8 r— XPLORATION PIT LOG INUMBOER EP-3 5 10 15 SEDIMENT DESCRPTION Loose, dry to damp, grey/brown, fine sand with trace to some silt. (Fill) Medium dense to dense, moist to wet, grey, sand and gravel. BOH 5' Note: Slow seepage and minor caving below 32' depth NUMBER EP-4 0 5- 10. 15 SMEEMT DESCRPTION Loose, dry to damp, grey and brown mixed, sand and silt with numerous organics. (Fill) Dense, moist, brown grading to grey, fine sand with some gravel. BOH 5' Note: Slow seepage at 4', minor sloughing below 4' depth Cottingham Residence Edmonds, Washington. ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC 8906-20G ' June 1989 1 1310 co _o a) Ln •r a -_;_ _ _ _ j —.-- y- 1 , ,... ' ,^'s . Cv :j'r`J••-�l�i'�, s(='�3�,d to , � e. c#� ,. ,CITY of`ED�M POD,S. S10 For Inspection Call 771-3202 STREET FILE PERMIT N0. ; 08.�67�` Address of Construction: 1 oZCo, S(a('__)e �Gy\e. Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Builder: A I0 TREA11MENT PLANT Contractor & License No: Single Family Residence RECtivL) Multi -Family (No. of Units ) SEP 221989 Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) PUBLIC WORKS Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No / .,,Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555)'before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No __,� Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number_.) PLEASE READ THE.ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK EC/ I ertify that I have read and shall comply Dat vv�th the items listed on the back. Permit r "Issued Charge:1 1 1.Issued: Assessment Fee: _Z_/p Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: S 't464 Date Initial Rejected: Reason Date Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** US White Copy - File Green Copy -'Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant Side Sewer Drawing The City Of Edmonds Side NO. ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION G✓" REPAIRS ❑ LID NO ................... ASMT. NO. ---------------- ._ OWNER CONTRACTOR l5tZ. E_..--••-•-------------------------------------------- PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS --1 IA SSW-...Q Y\J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. BLOCK NO. ori< 4 c- , k4�,J�, • L' u (-. � S 7,� k I p C !� p-, % oE- Ili 0 NAMEOF ADDITION---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- � r, !P' pVG Cho �p� Deep• — / de c,l0 a" Def-4- L-jaP.1ENT PLANT y � � g `� LD p►JC ��(�ihj lh�N Pprove 5 0 � � I PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE . - 1------------ Bye.-7---------------------------- Property of: 1 CITY - OF EDi\ ADS 'MONDS N2 5c'80 NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT RREET FILE ASSEI&FORMATION 'SHEET ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION L` c, SERIAL NO. LOCATION O DEPT. NO. * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST *PROJECT NUMBER 1/\J9 ZS()77 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST �3S 8 . '� B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. I "00d d r 3 L1S V 0(0.3 ESTIMATED LIFE INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE b P INITIAL DATE a'A I � V_IFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. DEPARTMENT FILE STREET FILE Tfjf& MINUTES SUBJECT TO A 1.,.198%,APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 25, 1999' (WORK MEETING) i; t_ « 8 1989 ,,-r•:ssi:: The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Larry Naughten at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF Larry Naughten, Mayo Steve Dwyer Duane Bowman, Assoc. City Planner Bill Kasper, Council President Peter Hahn, Comm. Svc. Director Laura Hall, Councilmember Brent Hunter, Personnel Manager Roger Hertrich, Councilmember Linda McCrystal, Arts Coordinator Jo -Anne Jaech, Councilmember Ron Schirman, Asst. Fire Chief John Nordquist, Councilmember Bobby Mills, Public Works Supt. Jack Wilson, Councilmember Dan Prinz, Police Chief. Chuck Day, Accounting Manager Bob Bower, Treatment Plant Supvr. Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Scott Snyder, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, City Clerk Margaret Richards, Recorder Councilmember Nordquist arrived a few minutes late and did not vote on any item on the Consent Agenda except Item (I). rnNCFNT AnrNnA Items (B), (F), (G), and (I) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRILD. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following: (A) ROLL CALL 4,,�JWZ,J (C) ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2727 REPEALING EDMONDS CITY CODE CHAPTER 4.10 REGARDING TOW TRUCKS (D) ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2728 AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 19.05 RELATING TO ENGINEERING REVIEWS AND COSTS i (E) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES FOR BRACKETT'S LANDING JETTY IMPROVEMENTS 9a (H) 1989OVAL OF TRANSFER OF S24,000 FROM FUND 412 TO FUND 112 IN CONNECTION WITH PHASE I OF OVEPROGRAM (J) ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY EASEMENT FROM RODNEY R. AND DOLORES E. COTTINGHAM FOR STORM SEWER ACROSS 1026 CASCADE LANE (K) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM JOHN B. AND WANDA L. FLEMING ($724.80) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1989 [ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA] Councilmember Hertrich made the following correction at the request of Councilmember Dwyer: page 5, paragraph 1, amend sentence deleting the word "not" so it reads, "Councilmember Dwyer said although several height variances have been approved for PRD's, he noted that the case before the %yt,v�wc Council is the first instance in which the issue of whether or not it was proper to grant a vari- ance in PRD's has been raised". Councilmember Kasper made the following corrections: page 7, paragraph 15, amend the second sentence to read, "He felt the solution would be to grant the height variance to a single story limit above street grade"; page 8, paragraph 12, he noted that the minutes did not reflect the seconder of the motion. (The minute taker referenced her notes and found that the seconder to the motion was Councilmember Hall.) DMONDS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO • •- Item number: STREET FILE Originator: Engineering Division For Action: x For Information: SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT UTILITY EASEMENT FROM RODNEY R. AND DOLORES E. COTTINGHAM FOR A STORM SEWER ACROSS 1026 CASCADE LANE AGENDA TIME: Consent AGENDA DATE: July 25; 1989 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Proposed easement Clearances: Dept./Indiv./Initials ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING . /V PARKS & RECREATION PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS FIRE PERSONNEL POLICE COMMITTEE MAYOR COMMENTS: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT IAPPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0 HISTORY AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: For several years, a portion of the runoff from Olympic Avenue has drained across the subject lot. This storm sewer has just been reconstructed to follow the perimeter of the Cottingham property (in conjunction with the construction of their home). The majority of the flow in this system is storm related runoff coming from Olympic Avenue or the roads immediately up hill. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept easement and authorize the City Clerk to record the easement. COUNCIL ACTION: EASECOTT/TXTAGNDA 0 • UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Rodney R. & Dolores E. Cottin ham, hereby grants to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal uorporation, a permanent easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of a culvert over, across, through and below the following described property; and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said utility, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement hereby granted is located in Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: A ten foot strip of land that is 5.00 feet on each side of the storm sewer as it now exists or as located in the future. Within the South 165 feet of the East 300 feet of Lot 14, PUGET SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT FIVE ACRE TRACTS, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 47, records of Snohomish County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Edmonds for street (Cascade Lane) by deed recorded September 28, 1967 under Recording No. 1988551; AND EXCEPT that portion thereof lying Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the East 300 feet of said Lot 14; THENCE East along the South line of said Lot for 80 feet to the True Poant of Beginning of the herein described line; THENCE North 0 10'30" East 110 feet; THENCE North 11 08'33" West 25.50 feet to the Southerly boundary of Cascade Lane as conveyed to the City of Edmonds by deed recorded under Recording No. 1988551, and the terminus of the herein described line. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. DATED this i c� day of /pjy 19 �57 STATE OF.WASHINGTONj COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me RODNEY R. COTTINGHAM and DOLORES E. COTTINGHAM to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 18th DAY OF JULY 19 89 . SALLY JONGATIRAT STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY — • — PUBLIC My Comm(ssW Ex 12.12.92 EASECOTT/TXTFORMS -NOT YI i ,and for the State --of Washington, rre iding at /-c, 11.171--le j 2 /2. % 2 District City o�dmonds — Water Departure TAP CARD - ROUTING SLIP Readingd Date SERVICE jNSTALLATI0,W . No. No. ADDRESS' I O (o G,,a"c c�'((Q Meter 3l Tap�.� „ a Size � Size DATE: Mf rs. No. Style �S �' ... . g � DIAL -A DIG # �%3�33.8 Purchaser: �-�.q.�'%- }�ow>.,z=y T`� `Serv. Add. 10 a �.4.c�<AGQk �..JL- P.U.D. Lot. No. Blk. No. . Add': Residential: Other: Meter Location AT 1/5X7 %U l0ok:/ 2_ w Service Material: Pressure lbs. Test % ork 9 - 2 P�' TELEPHONE CABLE T.V. F GAS . FOREMAN, STORM SEWER OTHER FUTURE, SERVICE INSTL: YES NO Forernan� BORE:: ' CUT: Guar. Voucher o. IiVQS SSG 1. Proj. No: Ujq TS Pf 4 q 4 Loex DATE:... .. -INITIAL: -, CREW .UNLOCj_y ..DATE:.INITIAL. .. . yy { i ACCOUNT NUMBER: :Z I TO I D METER SHOP Remarks: RCe-0epi .2e-,o SUPPLIER:.- TREATMENT PLANT FOREMAN � B .. L T i OUTGOING Index Reg. Route Bk. Stencil Card FOREMAN' INITIAL:. DATE: INCOMING Index Reg. Route M. Stencil Card V _...._ ._..__ ..- PL'ICA+T� TAP: METER SHEET: AP, j UTILITY ;DISPA BILLING \ I a D4 TLIM : CITYOF EDMOAID3 1 8EN0HAJ4A11s : 111AN11-,0L E # 79 1 70F ° 145.6 6 / IAIV - /3 7 70 tT_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 EX. I0, UTILITY ESMT - 1 11 1 N8 9 �4 ZB W 55.00 Ely. 4 WOOD �F6NCE� > CB'�3 TYPE- I A I> TOP= 146•07 t YARD DRAG �I lNV = /42.07- „ TOP-- 14G.04 -r /NV= 143 4-4 00A)%C//QrY%ou S/BMWs_4Frc x� I s. o� MOW CB V W x \ 10P = 14&.54 INV /43.29-4Y1,5 D. P' = 14 5.54 j I it o i a W D �4, I3 0 PROPOSED .� xa HOUSE-�, j CS #S TYPE I TO,' = 147. ?4 /NV = 143. 99 16" lNv= I44.9/� 4" hhitt)): V VY1 i_ C A-T'G kI 13A1:111 OCTLNTrON PIPf, LENGTH CoffTKOL CATC.y (YCty-r)l OlK IN • ) r- 1� MIN , 2' MAX COVER. ---I 5LOPE- I -Ji SYSTEM CROSS SECTION FENCE Filter barrier; This sed-iment barrier may be constructed using 7. If a filter barrier is to be constructed across a ditch line or.swale, 1. Set the stakes. 2. Excavate a 4"x4" trench standard strength synthetic filter fabric. It is designed for, low the barrier shall be of sufficient length to eliminate end flow, upslope along the line of or moderate flows not exceeding 1 cfs, and the plan configuration shall resemble an arc or horseshoe with stakes. ' �+ �- the ends oriented upslope." 1. The height of a filter barrier shall be a minimum of 15 inches and shall not exceed 18 inches. - 8.- Filter, barriers shall be removed when they have served their useful -1a _ i LLLUUU �Cui� SUN 3 r purpose, but not before the upslope area has been permanently stabi- - I I �� -� I 2. standard strength synthetic�t•ilter fabric shall be purchased lined.�,/-" /� �� in a,continuous roll and cut to the length of the barrier to avoid�� the use of joints (and thus improve the strength and efficiency of barrier ). Maintenance ��- f % ,!)r '(t " i ! ' ��3: i PERMIT, Cq_UITEEt the --- �" Flow / ,!!- it. 3. The stakes shall be spaced a maximum of 3 feel apart at the barrier 1. Silt fences and filter barriers shall be inspected immediately after 4" I location and driven securely into the ground (minimum of 8 inches). each rainfall ar,d at least daily during prolonged rainfall. Any required repairs shall be made immediately. 3. Staple filter material to 4. excavated and compact the 4. A trench shall be excavated approximately 4 inches wide and 4 inches �. Should the fabric on s silt fence or filter barrier decompose or stakes and extend it into excavated soil. deep along the line of stakes and upslope from the barrier. I become ineffective prior to the end of the expected usable life and the trench. I the barrier still be necessary, the fabric shall be replaced promptly. _ 5. The filter material .shall be stapled to the wooden stakes, and 8 inches of the fabric shall. be extended into the trench. Heavy duty i rite, q•'; a'1:' II ;;''• r; wire staples at least 1/2-inch long shall be used. Filter material 3. Sediment deposits should be removed after each storm event. They shall not be stapled to existing trees, must be removed when deposi.tn reach approximately one-half the height _..� I f ,r7�i q.�I�i� cf' the barrier-. G. The. Lrench shall be backfilled and the soil compacted over the filter_ lroterial. 4. Any sediment deposits remaining in place after the silt fence or filter barrier is no longer required shall be dressed to conform 6 - wiLh the existing grade, prepared and seeded. �\ I CONSTRUCTION OF A FILTER BARRIER L I \ CASCADE ____-------------------_--_-- P� Ca ># a TYPE 1.4 FIELD SET _--' - --- I -- --- ------ ------- -41" EX. 4 ' WOOD FENCE Rom---- _ -- iV8 9°34 2B "W'- -1'� I v 3 i A ��a.o i � N• � z a � � � oc �.IQ`" APPRD.Y I I W D z W cIp W TAP, lItol I I • ♦ � I l�J� I E � I BUILDING 4T11C qp� ' 1ENVELOPE 1 1 0 1?00F DRAIN 7YP/ CA L /II X. 18 Ctitt- I APPRO.Y. LOCATION CB* J TYPE YA. FIELD SE7- x x EX.4'WooD FENCE -- Igo i Q� I �j DV-rLt:T STANDARD DRAINAGE PLAN DETENTION SYSTEM TO OUT I- T (11.1 f-RA.11 OR for RDDNEy R. COTT/NGHIgm Rutvor- {' 0AIMArm P14AI SY{2EJ.DL'{: lucation.I028 CALICADA LAAIE EJM4AQj 4414,J& QTd7 plan by L)L t - S Ile ALAA/D phone 775-/5%/ date 6-6'69 DESIGN DATA r J System Imperm Pipe Pipe Orifice Number Area Diam Length Diameter II GEMERAL NOTES: 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 'OBTAIIII14G ALL 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. APPROXIMATE ONLY AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONS) OF ALL G. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY, SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD OPERATION PRIOR - TO CLEARING AND GRADING AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION"• SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND STANDARD. PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, AND AND,THE POTENTIAL OF ON=SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED METAL 14• GA. GALVANIZED AND ASPHALT COATED TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER,. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE, 12 GA., 3" X 1" CORR. (OR PVC I OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS ASTM D-3034) EXCEPT DETENTION PIPE OR AS NOTED. SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 8. ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. I 4. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PLAT AND CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE 9. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM DRAINAGE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE ENGINEER. SYSTEM. JUN in DRAINAGE PLAN FOR A�- . r RODNEY R. COTTINGHAM.- IN NE%4, SECTION 24,T. 27 N., R.3 E.,W. M: CITY OF 'EDMONDS NOTES SNOHOMISH COUNTY,:VlLASHINGTON 1. Call Engineering Division (771-3202) for prebackfill and final inspections. 2. Responsibility for operation and Lt�T V maintenance of drainage systems on Lovell-Sauerlccnd Associates, Inc. ofltheeproperty owerty ner(s). Mthe aterial Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite 200 • Lynnwood, WA 98037 - (206) 775-1591 - (206) 340-0830` basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice must be kept DRAWN CHECKED JDATE F.B. SCALE FILE NO. open at all times. A4.C.C. Jrr- (19.//t 2D' 89-222I JUN 2 3 1939 PERMIT COUNTER