Loading...
10307 238TH ST SW (2).PDFiiiiiiiiiiii 4162 10307 238TH ST SW ADDRESS: G �L� 7 Ci 6L/ TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: �CRITICAL AREAS: M b _ Oo -0 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): v ICJ I fiL b025�3- PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: 10 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) SOILS REPORT DA STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\.Street File Checklist doc i STREET FILE August 28, 2007 File No. 07-114 Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club c/o Mr. Rick Ashleman 19803 — 15'' Avenue NW Shoreline, WA 98177 RECEIVED OCT 13 2008 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Proposed Improvements Klahava Swim & Tennis Club 10307 — 238" Street SW, Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Ashleman, � �JD$-og51 PmGE@ I N C O R P O R A T E D Gecre,"'., icaf x Ezidhquakc Erg0ecring ronsl"!!a is As requested, PanGEO Inc. completed a geotechnical engineering assessment to assist you and your design team with the design of the proposed improvements at the Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club. The authorization to proceed with the study was verbally approved by you, and our scope of work included a site meeting with you on August 1, 2007, observed the excavation of three test pits, conducted laboratory index testing, and preparation of this report. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Klahaya Club is located at 10307 — 238'h Street SW in Edmonds, Washington. As shown on the attached Figure 1, the site is practically level, and the existing improvements include a one- story clubhouse, a swimming pool, several tennis courts, an u-shaped paved driveway located between the clubhouse and 2381h Street SW, and parking areas adjacent to the driveway. Based on our discussion, we understand that the existing swimming pool will be expanded to the west by about 8 feet. The new expanded portion of the pool will be about 6 feet deep, or about 6 feet shallower than the deepest portion of the existing pool. In addition, a single -story addition to the clubhouse is also planned on the south side of the existing building. We also understand that, to accommodate the added surface runoff due to the added impervious surface, an infiltration gallery is also planed in the driveway area to dispose off the water_ SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Three test pits were excavated at the approximate locations indicated on Figure 1. The test pits were excavated on August 1, 2007 using a small track -mounted excavator. Summary test pit logs are attached for references purposes. In summary, the subsurface conditions encountered in Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 the test pits were consistent, and consisted of up to 2 feet of fill underlain by dense sandy gravel and sand that extended to the maximum depth of the test pits at about 6 feet. We interpret the sand and gravel as Advance Outwash, which is anticipated to exhibit high strength and low compressibility in its undisturbed state. GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS SITE CLASS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN We understand that the design of the proposed improvements will conforni to the 2003 edition of IBC, which specifies a design earthquake having a 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years (return interval of 2,475 years). For design purposes, it is our opinion that Site Class D is considered conservatively appropriate for this project. HOUSE FOUNDATION AND DESIGN PARAMETERS We anticipate the presence of competent bearing strata at or near the foundation level of the proposed additions to the swimming pool and clubhouse building. An allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf may be used .for sizing the footings bearing on the native sand and gravel, or on properly compacted structural fill placed on native soil. The recommended allowable bearing pressure may be increased by 1/3 for transient conditions such as wind and seismic loadings. All footings should be founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below the adjacent finish grade- or for interior footings, 12 inches below floor slabs. Spread and continuous footings should have minimum widths of 24 and 18 inches, respectively. Total and differential settlements arc anticipated to be within tolerable limits for footings designed and constructed as discussed above. Footing settlement under static loading conditions are estimated to be less than about %-inch and differential settlement across the house should be less than about '/a -inch. Most settlement will occur during construction as loads are applied. Lateral forces from wind or seismic loading may be resisted by the combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of the foundations and basement walls and by friction acting on the base of the foundations. Passive resistance values may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This value includes a factor safety of at least 1.5 assuming that a properly compacted structural fill will be placed adjacent to the sides of the footings. A coefficient friction of 0.4 may be used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the footings. This coefficient includes a factor safety of approximate 1.5. All footing excavations should be trimmed neat and footing subgrades should be carefully prepared. Any loose or softened soil should be removed from the footing excavations. Footing 07-1 14 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 2 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 excavations should be observed by PanGEO to confirm that the exposed footing suhgrrade is consistent with the expected conditions and adequate to support the design bearing pressure. POOL WALL DESIGN PARAMETERS The pool walls should be properly designed to resist the pressure exerted by the soils behind the walls. Our geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the basement walls are presented below. Lateral Earth Pressures — The walls should be designed for a static lateral earth pressure based upon an equivalent fluid weight of 50 pcf. A uniform pressure of 7H psf should be added to reflect the increase loading for seismic conditions, where H corresponds to the buried depth of the walls. The recommended lateral pressures assume that the backfill behind the wall consists of a free draining and properly compacted fill with adequate drainage provisions. Lateral Resistance — Lateral forces from seismic loading and unbalanced lateral earth pressures may be resisted by a combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of the foundations and by friction acting on the base of the foundations. Passive resistance values may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This value includes a factor of safety of 1.5, assuming that the structural fill adjacent to the sides of the footing has been compacted. A friction coefficient of 0.4 may be used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the footings. This coefficient includes a factor safety of approximately 1.5 as well. Wall Backfill —The on site sand and gravel are considered suitable for wall backfill. Wall backfill should be moisture conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to a dense and relatively unyielding condition and to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D 1557. Within 5 feet of the wall, the backfill should be compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density. C:ONCRFTE SLAB ON GRADE Conventional slab on grade construction may be used for the new clubhouse addition. Concrete slab on grade .floors should be supported on native dense sand and gravel or properly compacted structural fill placed on top of the native soil. The floor slab design may be accomplished using a modulus of subgrade reaction of 120 pci. Slabs should be underlain by a capillary break consisting of at least of 4 inches of free -draining crushed rock or well -graded gravel compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. The capillary break material should have no more than 10 percent passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 5 percent by weight of the material passing the U.S. 07-1 14 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 3 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 Standard No. 100 sieve. We also recommend that a 6-mil polyethylene vapor barrier be placed below the slab. INFILTRATION RA'rE Infiltration rates of the site soils were evaluated based on grain size distributions using the methodology outlined in the Stormwater Management in PVestern Washington manual (Washington State Department of Ecology, 2005). The method correlates soil infiltration rates with the DIo (grain diameter corresponding to 10% finer by weight) gradation parameter developed by ASTM test method D-422. According to the Department of Ecology Stormwater Manual (2005), the design soil infiltration rate can be estimated using the parameters summarized in the following table: Table 1. Infiltration rates based on ASTM gradation testing (source: WSDOE,, 2005) D,a Size from ASTM D-422 Soil Gradation Test (mm) Estimated long term (design) infiltration rate (inchihour) > 0.4 9 0.3 6.5 0.2 3.5 0.1 0.05 2.0 0.8 Sieve analyses (ASTM 422) performed on four representative samples retrieved from the test pits (see attached grain size distribution curves) indicate that the site soils are suitable for infiltration. Estimated infiltration rates at the site, which are based on the parameters outlined in Table 1 above, are summarized below: Table 2. Summary of Dto and infiltration rate Estimated long tcnn Sample location Sample Description DI from ASTM (design) D-422 (mm) infiltration rate (inch/hour) TP-1 @ 3 ft Sandy gravel with trace silt 0.5 9 TP-1 @ 5 ft Sandy gravel with trace silt 0.6 9 TP-2 @ 4.5 ft Sand with some gravel, trace silt 0.2 3.5 TP-3 cr 3 ft i Gravelly sand with trace silt 0.4 9 07-1 14 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 4 PanGEO, Inc. "ON Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Temns Club August 28, 2007 We understand that the infiltration facility will be located in the vicinity of the driveway where TP-1 and TP-3 were excavated. As such, it is our opinion that a long tern infiltration rate of 9 inches per hour may be used for design of the infiltration system CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS TEMPORARY CUT SLOPES Temporary excavations may be up to about 7 to 8 feet deep to expand the swimming pool. The excavations are anticipated to encounter mostly dense sand and gravel. Temporary excavations greater than 4 feet deep should be properly sloped or shored. All temporary excavations should be perfonned in accordance with Part N of WAC (Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. The contractor is responsible for maintaining safe excavation slopes and/or shoring. For planning purposes, the temporary excavations may be sloped to as steep as 1H:1 V (horizontal:vertical), but may be re-evaluated in the field during construction based on actual observed soil conditions. STRUCTURAL FILL Structural fill will be required at locations where fill needs to be placed to raise grade and where the iunderlving subgrades are unsuitable for foundation support. Where needed, it is our opinion that the on -site sand and gravel maybe re -used as structural fill. hmported structural till, if needed, should consist of granular soils containing less than 7% fines (passing a 8200 sieve) and a maximum particle size of 4 inches. The structural fill should be moisture conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 8 inches in thickness, and systematically compacted to a dense and relatively unyielding condition and to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D 1557. WET WEATHER. EARTHWORK In our opinion, the proposed site construction may be accomplished during the winter without adversely affecting the site stability. Winter construction, however, will require the implementation of best management erosion and sedimentation control practice to reduce the chances of off -site sediment transport. Some of the site soils contain a high percentage of .fines and are moisture sensitive. Any subgrade soils that become softened either by disturbance or rainfall should be removed and replaced with properly compacted granular structural fill or CDF. General recommendations relative to earthwork performed in wet conditions are presented below: 07-114 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 5 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 • Site stripping, excavation and subgrade preparation should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of clean structural G)i, capillary break material or base course material. • Foundation and pavement subgrades must be protected from softening from rainfall. • The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturbance. • During wet weather, the allowable fines content (material by weight passing the #200 sieve) of the structural fill should be reduced to no more than 5 percent, based on the. portion passing'/4-inch sieve. The fines should be non -plastic. • The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water. • Bales of straw and/or geotextile silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion and the movement of soil. As a minimum, erosion control along the east property boundary (down -slope side) should be in place before construction begins. GENERAL SURFACE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONSIDERATIONS Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically, this includes the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms in conjunction with silt fences to collect runoff and prevent water from entering the excavation or to prevent nunoff.from the construction area from leaving the immediate work site. Temporary erosion control may require the use of hay bales on the down gradient side of the construction area to prevent water from leaving the site and potential storm water detention to trap sand and silt before the water is discharged to a suitable outlet. All collected water should be directed under control to a positive and permanent discharge system such as a storm sewer. Temporary provisions may also be required such as the use of quarry spalls at the entrance to the construction site to reduce the possibility of the offsite transport of soil on the truck tires. Pennanent control of surface water should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and drainage systems should be incorporated into the design such that surface runoff is directed away from structures. Potential problems associated with erosion may also be reduced by establishing vegetation within disturbed areas immediately following grading operations. CLOSURE We have prepared this report for use by Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club and the project design team. Recommendations contained in this report are based on a site reconnaissance, a review of 07-1 14 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 6 PanGEO, Inc. Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 pertinent subsurface information, and our understanding of the project. The study was performed using a mutually agreed -upon scope of work. Variations in soil conditions may exist between the locations of the explorations and the actual conditions underlying the site. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site that are different from those described in this report, we should be notified immediately to review the applicability of our recommendations. Additionally, we should also be notified to review the applicability of our recommendations if there are any changes in the project scope. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Additionally, the scope of our work specifically excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics, particularly those involving hazardous substances. We are not mold consultants nor are our recommendations to be interpreted as being preventative of mold development. A mold specialist should be consulted for all mold -related issues. This report has been prepared for planning and design purposes for specific application to the proposed project in accordance with the generally accepted standards of local practice at the time this report was written. No warranty, express or implied; is made. This report may be used only by the client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both off and on -site), or other factors including advances in our understandino of applied science, may change over time and could materially affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 24 months from its issuance. PanGEO should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 24 months from the date of this report so that we may review the applicability of our conclusions considering the time lapse. It is the client's responsibility to see that all parties to this project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the contractor's option and risk. ,Any party other than the client who wishes to use this report shall notify PanGEO of such intended use and for permission to copy this report. Based on the intended use of the report, PanGEO may require that additional work be perfonmed and that an updated report be reissued. Noncompliance with any of these requirements will release PanGEO from any liability resulting from the use this report. 07-1 14 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc 7 PanGEO, Inc. 0 Mr. Rick Ashleman Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club August 28, 2007 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, Slew L. Tan, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments Figure I Site and Exploration Plan Summary Test Pit Logs (I sheet) I Grain Size Distribution Curves (4 sheets) 07 - 114 Klahaya Club - Rpt.doc Is PanGEO, Inc. l f h.• � `t '� T�.� 'k�� ` � r ' � 'C{ +"� i`^ s; �!d t .•� y fs MR • �,' �i t ;,s � � `' 'y ;��.•'.. 38th St�SW : ;`� 9 y.f ► g FM _ : 4 +r► Ott. �.� '• � ,ns-e� � a+ . + #� + _ t •Ti" I� Y �y. F Al�.yl •3..yy9 r�. ai M r x'!v o-i, . Cry: _ rr'A T.* o S ' E"+ ; �5 r Jr•r ,�' ���,. i'r� % i�"+F�. is a . 0. � •v'i ♦""' •��' K �i*. �; y ~'� � �'�F''^ t r�"!��~-�'-.t 1" 2• nr ^►fit �' et.�... - �'y: + f '�+ r'+�i '�iz�L,r. $1.{*� ro�''Yl IiV t*r. � I�r�1• � � � ,�. ! i �r�. kay - � � i nJ�' r•.'f � r "rIf% �' ,i'i w � t . � �� J , r i S �:� �"�� '.,.r —a► �:. f. Y ti �• � �I—c s+,+M" '� '�►` 4 y�� �'g;;,` '�� 3001MiuDSOlEi �!"�.+GD7 LICLfrtet1D146i 'l y; X � .' �Ka ti •el X� .4�r. ►i.w .N hrt .k rr Y ��d`4 N � � ". ® ��J Summary Test Pit Logs Test Pit No. 1. Location: Just west of the basketball hoop (see Figure 1) Depth ft Material Description 0— 2 Approximately 3 inches of sod over loose to medium dense, dry to moist, tan, silty, fine to medium SAND, trace organics (Topsoil/Fill) 2 — 5 % Dense to very dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL, trace silt. Moist. Test Pit terminated approximately 5 % feet below ground surface. No seepage or caving observed in the exploration. Test Pit No. 2 Location: Just west of the existing swimming pool (see Figure 1) Depth ft Material Description 0 — '/4 Approximately 3 inches of sod over loose to medium dense, dry to moist, tan, silty fine to medium SAND, trace organics (Topsoil/Fill) '/4 —2 Dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL, trace silt. Moist. 2 — 4% Dense, slightly gravelly SAND, trace silt, moist. 4%2 — 5 Very dense, brown and gray, silty fine SAND with gravel, till -like, moist. 5-6 Dense, slightly gravelly SAND, trace silt, moist. Test Pit terminated approximately 6 feet below ground surface. No seepage or caving observed in the exploration. Test Pit No. 2 Location: South of driveway (see Figure 1) Depth ft ]Material Description 0 t Approximately 3 inches of sod over loose to medium dense, dry to moist, tan, silty, fine to medium SAND, trace organics (Topsoil/Fill) 1 —5 Dense to very dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL, trace silt. Moist. Test Pit terminated approximately 5 feet below ground surface. No seepage or caving observed in the exploration. THE RILEY GROUP, INC. • • PHONE: (425) 415-0551 17522 Bothell Way NE FAX: (425) 415-0311 Bothell, WA 98011 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D 421, D 2217, D 1140, C 1 t7, D 422, C 136 PROJECT TITLE PanGEO Soil Testing 2007-007 PROJ.E CT N O. TECFI/DATE PLL 8/15/07 WATER CONTENT (Delivered Moisture) Wt Wet Soil & Tare (gm) (wl) 715.70 Wt Dry Soil &Tare (gm) (w2) 695.80 Weight of Tare (gm) (w3) 15.10 Weight of Water (gm) (w4=wl-W2) 19.90 Weight of Dry Soil (gm) (w5=w2-w3) 680.70 Moisture Content (%) (w4/w5)' 1001 2.92 COBBLES % C GRAVEL % F GRAVEL % C SANA % M SAND % F SAND % FINES TOTAL D10 (mm) D30 (mm) D60 (mm) Cu Cc 0.00 12.0 3.0' 2.5' 2.0' 1.5' 1.0' 0.75' 0.50' 0.375' #z #1( #2( #4( #6( 19.47 41.80 10.69 2046. 6.83 0.75 100.00 0.5 2.4 12 24.0 1.0 100 % 90 80 P 70 A 60 S 50 S 40 1 30 N 20 G 10 0 #10( #20C PAN SAMPLE ID/TYPE TP-1 SAMPLE DEPTH 3.0' Weight Of Sample (gin) Tare Weight (gm) (W6) Total Dry Weight (gm) SIEVE ANALYSIS Cumulative WtRet(Wt-Tare (%Retained) %PASS +Tare ir-t-ti-A)*inns nn0 0/retl 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 147.60 132.50 19.47 80.53 329.00 313.90 46.11 53.89 432.10 417.00 61.26 38.74 504.90 489.80 71.96 28.04 644.20 629.10 92.42 7.58 687.50 672.40 98.78 1.22 690.70 675.60 99.25 0.75 695.80 680.70 100.00 0.00 695.90 15.10 680.70 cobbles coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel fine gravel fore gravel Fine gravel ;oarse sand medium sand medium sand Fine sand fine sand fine sand fines ;ilt/clay loll I I In i INMilli 11. E RINI 0 u 11 IN IIIN-IN 1 111111 in =1 1000 100 10 1 0.1 Grain size in millimeters DESCRIPTION Sandy GRAVEL with truce silt Descriptive Terns trace 0 to 5% little 5 to 12% USCS GVI' some 12 to 30% and 30 to 50% 0.01 0.001 The Riley Group, Inc. THE RILEY GROUP, INC. 17522 Bothell Way NE Bothell, WA 98011 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSTS ASTM D 421, .D 2217, D 1140, C 117, D 422, C 136 PROJECT TITLE PanGEO Soil Testing PROJECT NO. 2007-007 TECH/DATE PLL 8/15/07 WATER CONTENT (Delivered Moisture) Wt Wet Soil & Tare (gm) (wl) 850.30 Wt Dry Soil & Tare (gin) (w2) 836.30 Weight of Tare (gin) (w3) 15.00 Weight of Water (gin) (w4=wl-w2) 14.00 Weight of Dry Soil (gm) (w5=w2-w3)1 821.30 Moisture Content (%) (w4/w5)*100 1.70 % COBBLES % C GRAVEL % F GRAVEL % C SAND M SAND % F SAND % FINES TOTAL D10 (mm) D30(mm) D60 (min) Cu Cc 0.00 12.0' 3.0' 2.5' 2.0' 1.5' 1.0' 0.75' 0.50' 0.375' #4 #lC #2C #4C 116C 10.29 52.59 15.56 16.04 5.39 0.13 100.00 0.65 3.2 9.5 14.6 1.7 100 % 90 80 P 70 A 60 S 50 S 40 1 30 N 20 G 10 0 #10C 1120C PAN PHONE: (425) 415-0551 FAX: (425) 415-0311 SAMPLE ID/TYPE TP-1 SAMPLE DEPTH 5.0 Weight Of Sample (gm) Tare Weight (gm) (W6) Total Dry Weight (gin) SIEVE ANALYSIS Cumulative Wt Ret(WI-Tare) (%Retained) %PASS +Tare 1(wt ret/w6)*1001 N 00 %ret) 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 99.50 84.50 10.29 89.71 336.30 321.30 39.12 60.98 531.40 516.40 62.89 37.12 659.20 644.20 78.44 21.56 790.90 775.90 94.47 5.53 832.70 817.70 99.56 0.44 835.20 820.20 99.87 0.13 836.30 821.30 100.00 0.00 11 SEMI iw Y 1000 100 10 1 0.1 Grain size in millimeters DESCRIPTION Sandy GRAVEL with trace silt Descriptive Ternis trace 0 to 5% little 5 to 12% USCS GW some 12 to 30DA and 30 to 50% 836.30 15.00 82I.30 cobbles coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel Fine gravel Fuie gravel fine gravel coarse sand medium sand medium sand Fine sand Fine sand iuie sand Ines ;ilt/clay 0.01 0.001 The Riley Group, Inc, THE RILEY GROUP, INC. 17522 Bothell Way NE Bothell, WA 98011 • • PHONE: (425) 415-0551 FAX: (425) 415-0311 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D 421, D 2217, D 1140, C 117, D 422, C 136 PROJECT TITLE PanGEO Soil Testing 2007-007 PROJECT NO. TECH/DATE PLL 8/15/07 WATER CONTENT (Delivered Moisture) Wt Wet Soil & Tare (gm) (wl) 541.90 Wt Dry Soil & Tare (gm) (w2) 509.50 Weight of Tare (gm) (w3) 15.00 Weight of Water (gm) (w4=wl-w2) 32.40 Weight of Dry Soil (gm) (Nv5=w2-w3) 494.50 Moisture Content M (w4/w5)- 1001 6.55 % COBBLES % C GRAVEL % F GRAVEL % C SAND % M SAND % F SAND % FINES % TOTAL D10 (mm) D30(mm) D60 (mm) Cu Cc 0.00 12.0 3.0' 2.5' 2.0' 1.5' 1.0' 0.75' 0.50' 0.375' ll]( 92( lt4C #6C 0.00 17.80 10.43 39.74 30.41 1.62 100.00 0.19 0.39 1.4 7.4 0.6 #10C #20C PAN 100 % 90 80 P 70 A 60 S 50 S 40 1 30 N 20 G 10 0 SAMPLE ID/TYPE TP-2 SAMPLE DEPTH 4.s Weight Of Sample (gm) Tare Weight (gm) (W6) Total Dry Weight (gm) SIEVE ANALYSIS Cumulative WtRet(Wt-Tare (%Retained) %PASS .t'hare nnn o/retl 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 55.10 40.10 9.11 91.89 103.00 88.00 17.80 82.20 154.60 139.60 28.23 71.77 351.10 336.10 67.97 32.03 490.90 475.90 96.24 3.76 501.50 496.50 98.39 1.62 509.50 494.50 100.00 0.00 2 1000 100 10 1 0.1 Grain size in millimeters DESCRIPTION SAND with some gravel and trace silt Descriptive Terns (race 0 to 5% little 5 to 12% USCS SP some 12 to 30% and 30 to 50% 509.50 15.00 494.50 cobbles coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel coarse gravel ;oaise gravel Fine gravel Fine gravel Fine gravel ;oarse sand nedium sand nedium sand me sand me sand me sand :Des oilt/clay 0.01 0.001 The Riley Group, Inc. Y THE RILEY GROUP, INC. • PHONE: (425) 415-0551 17522 Bothell Way NE FAX: (425) 415-0311 Bothell, WA 98011 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS ASTM D 421, D 2217, D 1140, C 117, D 422, C 136 PROJECT TITLE PanGEO Soil Testing SAMPLE ID/TYPE TP 3 PROJECT NO. 2007-007 SAMPLE DEPTH 3.01 TECH/DATE PLL 8/15/07 WATER CONTENT (Deliverer! Moisture) Wt Wet Soil & Tare (gm) (wl) 772.20 Wt Dry Soil & Tare (gm) (w2) 754.30 Weight of Tare (gm) (w3) 15.10 Weight of Water (gm) (w4=wl-w2) 17.90 Weight of Dry Soil (gin) (w5=vr2-w3) 739.20 Moisture Content (%) (w4/w5)* 100 2.42 % COBBLES 0.00 12.0 % C GRAVEL 11.26 3.0 % F GRAVEL 38.26 2.5 % C SAND 13.15 2.0 M SAND 27.03 1.5 % F SAND 9.81 1.0 % FINES 0.50 0.75' % TOTAL 100.00 0.50' 0.375' Dl0 (mm) 0.42 & D30 (mm) 1.4 # I D60 (mm) 7.6 42( Cu 18.1 #4( Cc 0.6 #6( #10C #20C PAN 100 % 90 80 P 70 A 60 S 50 S 40 1 30 N 20 G 10 0 Weight Of Sample (gm) Tare Weight (gm) (W6) Total Dry Weight (gm) SIEVE ANALYSIS Cumulative Wt Re((Wt-Tare Retained % PASS +Tare rr�� PdW�+imp rinn_°irPti� 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 15.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 98.30 83.20 11.26 88.74 280.40 265.30 35.89 64.11 381.10 366.00 49.51 50.49 478.30 463.20 62.66 37.34 678.10 663.00 99.69 10.31 748.00 732.90 99.15 0.85 750.60 735.50 99.50 0.50 754.30 739.20 100.00 0.00 1000 100 10 1 0.1 Grain size in millimeters DESCRIPTION Gravelly SAND with trace silt Descriptive Tenns tracc 0 to 5% little 5 to 12% USCS SP some 12 to 30% and 30 to 50% 754.30 15.I0 739.20 -obbles ;oarse gravel ;oarse gravel ;oarse gravel ;oarse gravel ;oarse gravel me gravel 'me gravel :me gravel :oarse sand nedium sand nedium sand ine sand ime sand ime sand ines ilt/clay 0.01 0.001 The Riley Group, Inc. 0 - FILE December 1, 2008 File No. 07-114 Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club c/o Mr. Rick Ashleman 19803 — 15'h Avenue NW Shoreline, WA 98177 RESU R- utu 0 v 2008 BUbW&WARMV MON Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Proposed Improvements Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club 10307 — 238th Street SW, Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Ashleman, 46 f 1A C 0 R F 0 9 A T 6 9 Geotechnical 11 Earltlquoike Engineenng G'cns,ibnts This is to confirm that the seismic design parameter outlined in our report dated August 28, 2007 is consistent with both the 2003 and the 20M IBC. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service, and please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, y08 Siew L. Tan, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Cc: Tom Hommond PLANNING DATA stnee>r�e Multi -Family • Commercial Name: V-1 AhA a 6w!M &-fevinis Club Review Date: Site Address: Permit Number: BLD.20 0 g , o $ 5 Project Description: SWliVV1V►n1r19 Poo( Be Ioptrh Vtotoe remodel Zoning: ;L S —is comp Plan: 6 i Y191 G fa rA i (y - U Vb4 VI 1. Corner Lot: (YES / �0 Flag Lot: (YES / Ol� Variance: Shoreline: ADB: CUP: yoo $ 49 Pre-App: --- LLA: Plans Match ADB Approved: (YES / NO) Lot Aggregation Required: (YES / NO) Use Proposed: N`Ci= e)W1 /18I+eV►h(S '�publtG Use Permitted: ( ES NO) WP / I V Cl�(,•�1 Subdivision/Legal/Recording Number: / Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES NO) �e m Critical Areas Fite Number: I q q (p tia 6eoft h report d a+cd 18.2$.07 ❑ Study Required ' waiver bi p Qh &M SEPA Determination: e)(evnpt ❑ > 500 cubic yards of grading? ❑ 5 • new dwelling units? ❑ Parking for 20 • vehicles? ❑ > 4000 square feet of new commercial area? Required Setbacks Street: 25 Side: i.5 sib: •1.5 # Rear: 5 Actual Setbacks Street: ' v Side: ', 5 Sid .� -7 5 Rear: 7 15 ❑ Structures: Rockeries/Retaining Walls • Fences/Trellises/Arbors • Trash Enclosure • Signage ❑ Modulation: Bay Windows • Projecting Modulation • Chimney/Fireplace ❑ Encroachments: Covered Deck/Porch • Uncovered Unenclosed < 30" Deck/Porch/Patio > 30" Stairs • > 30" Eaves Parking Required: 7j y Parking Provided: 9j y Coverage Required: 25 �• Coverage Provided: (�•/ 2.*s acreo (rww GO) Lot Area: r 4 Lot Coverage Mail' 37, 332 � Calculations: Building Height Datum Point: NA - f t Q+ c7tD I(Y Datum Elevation: Maximum Height: 2151 Actual Height: ot i Signage Existing/Proposed: N o Y1•4r, SbI0W VI, . nc •epanda b ny e,Jond fi�tafi.MvA1'r v1 9 \ Plan Review By: Gina Coccia, Associate Planner e,)(. nT)ALVrtfDr1hi ty Wry 6 0,fpYo Vrct fin mug h UA-WD$- 9 PLANNING DATA Multi -Family • Commercial landscaping Notes Landscaping Matches ADB Approved: (YES / NO) Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO) Landscaping Bid Amount: S Landscape Inspection Fee: t streelr iwe CommerClal Parking Analysis Business Name Type/Use Parking Ratio Tenant Area Required Parking fiG�G 1't•50.Oti0. �.8 �lyb0� �q ► �k �' 4- 5yL+ ' Our re vi rrtfo aric-ir1 ann ' Total Parking Required: N I C, Total Parking Provided: MUIV-Family Parking Analysis # Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit Parking Ratio u Units Required Parking Studio 1.2/D.U. 1 Bedroom 1.5/D.U. 2 Bedrooms 1.8/D.U. 3 - Bedrooms 2.0/D.U. Total Parking Required: Total Parking Provided: Other q3$ Plan Review By: Gina Coccia, Associate Planner of (Eb oub 6t?tr::5r DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS f�z PER International Building Code Section 110 Occupancy established by this certificate: B/A3 Maximum Occupant Load Room. -capacity signs, whe Owner of Building: Klahava Swim & Tennis Club THE Klahava Swim $ Tennis Club 4:o HA9:eEEN IN 2006 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING ;CODE AS AO USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED Dwelling Units: N/A on: VB No. Stories: 1 Basement: N/A P00IM' use 49 (Per IBC 1004) required, must remain posted at all times. 4 Add^resslTenarit°Space; 10307 238`h Street SW �ECTED,AND.APPROVED,AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PIED BY'THE CITY FOR, HE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE ' Issued this 25th day:of June. 2009 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL ` BY: This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, ilated obscured and shall be maintained in legible condition at all times. My change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new Certift to of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. to t\. .n. .l •J•.• t t A. .4% t.'+••t. t+st. •At .tAi. A•. •A•• M• •AL Mt. M•. •A•� .• A. •Ai :+Lt. tA. •.'�i. •t.•� •A• 1N. {,1,,,, ������� ������t . i S f• S",•,,,'' S',11/'} ������ S• i S• i ������� � �t1Yv �111�/ �% �! Svc �I �% ,• �lll/Q� ��YII �I �% �11F'D �lY!/ v1Yv �lllfl� �!I t�/ �% �% v�v v�r �11Y1� �I �11Y!/ �% � � � �11Y!/ et'tp of DEPARTMDINGS oubi K(e (eb ENT OF BUIL st tolsila ..PER International Building Code Section 110 Occupancy established by this certificate: Dwelling Units: N/A No. Stories: 1 B/A3 Tynstruction: VB Basement: N/A Maximum Occupant Load-'-:.:—P.00f-klouse 49 (Per IB;C 1004) Room.�capac�fy signs, when requiredmwst remain posted at all times. Owner of Building: Klahava Swim $ TenriisXIbb Atl�l ess/Tenant Space t 10307 238" Street SW THE Klahava Swim Tennis Club HAS BEEN INSPECtTED,AND APPROVED.' -AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTEQ` BY THE CITY FOR THE'GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED. Issued this 25th June. 2009 CHIEF BUILDING`OFFICIAL BY: This certificate shall be posted In a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, ilaled obscured and shall be maintained in legible condition at all times. Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new Certifi to of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. � I S JAl•i S fr'•1�•:•%'•• S JA!iMS •+'r2} : MG• i MG• •A :M• M►ti A t SJAl'. .JU�Al!•:. �•A•:.J°�•f awes AAU0 sees, • STREET FILE MEMORANDUM Date: August 4, 1998 To: Councilmember Plunkett From: Rob Chave, Planning d Subject: Klahaya Permit Application This is a response to the question you asked concerning a Conditional Use Permit (CU) approved for the Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club for an addition to their clubhouse building entrance. The Hearing Examiner approved the CU on March 8, 1996. The club is located at 10307 238`h Street SW, and is currently a nonconforming use because it is zoned residential and is not located on an arterial. The property was annexed to the City in December, 1995. At that time, the applicant had already begun the application process with the County. Although the application had begun with the County, the City accepted the application primarily because the Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club was applying for improvements which were intended to bring its entrance and shower facilities into compliance with ADA requirements. This was a "reasonable accommodation" recommended by the City Attorney in order to comply with Federal laws, notably the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The reasonable accommodation process was developed as a result of the City's litigation concerning Oxford House. In sum, the combination of factors (timing of the annexation and application for ADA improvements) was unique and not likely to be repeated. I hope this answers your question; my apologies for not getting an answer to you sooner. City of Edmonds ca Planning Division Message � Page 1 of 1 Bullock, Steve From: Bullock, Steve Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:44 PM To: 'Jerry Fleet' Subject: RE: Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club Hi Jerry, The one correction I have to your letter relates to the people capacity of your facility and your membership. First, the City doesn't care how many members you have and will not base its parking requirements on the number of members you have. Second, parking will be required based on the capacity of the facility to accommodate people. That said, improvements that increase your storage space and the like, do not increase the facilities capacity and therefore will not increase your parking requirements. However, if you plan on adding a lane to the pool, and the City determines that increases the capacity of your facility, you will be required to add parking based on section of our code you refer to in your letter. Thanks for the opportunity to respond and hopefully clarify. Sieve god" e4y 14 U"-O� -----Original Message ----- From: Jerry Fleet [mailto:jfleet@lmueller.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 12:48 PM To: 'bullock@ci.edmonds.wa.us' Subject: Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club Hi, Stephen. Attached is a letter I was going to mail to you until spotting your email address. Please let me know if I've got it right. Thanks in advance, Jerry Fleet 10/07/2004 October 7, 2004 Mr. Stephen Bullock, AICP Senior Planner CITY OF EDMONDS Development Services Department Planning Division 121 — 5 Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Klahaya Swim & Tennis Club 10317 238«' St. SW Edmonds, WA Hi, Steve, Just writing to confirm our conversation last Monday. Please let me know if my understanding is incorrect. First, in checking your file, you could not find record of limitations on Klahaya club membership capacity and don't believe that there are any. Second, if the club undertook facility improvements but did not expand the membership capacity, then increase in parking capacity would not become an issue. However, facility expansion (area increase) would trigger the city Design Review process. Examples discussed included adding a 6eh lane to the swimming pool and/or increasing the physical plant for chlorine storage, etc.: these would not change membership capacity but would require design review (though they might possibly be handled administratively in lieu of a full hearing process). Last, if the club undertook improvements that increased membership, then we would need to meet zoning code parking requirements. Chapter 17.50.020 of the code does not have a specific category of parking requirements for private swim pool clubs. The category most closely related appears to be B. Business, 8. Commercial Recreation (1 car stall required/500sf or 1 stall/occupant allowed by the maximum permitted occupant load), though any proposal would need to be reviewed on a case -by -case basis. Again, please advise if any of the above is incorrect, and again, thanks for your time. Regards, Jerry Fleet, Architect and Klahaya member LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES Architects 130 Lakeside, Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 Phone: 206.325.2553 Fax: 206.328.0554 email: jfleet@lmueller.com Klahaya tdoc r - • MEMORANDUM March 27, 1996 TO: Jeannine Graf, Building Official FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator SUBJECT: Review for Klahaya Swim Club permit a- 193-07 238th St. SWL . (Plan Check 96-20) The Engineering Division has reviewed these proposed revisions and has noted the following deficiencies in the plans: • The plans as submitted still do not reflect what is presently on the site. This plan must show what is present as it will become the basis for all future requirements for the site. I have tried to explain this to the architect, but there is apparently some lack of understanding of this concept. • There are two additional parking stalls at the north end of the east driveway that need to be shown. • Parking is not permitted on grass. The plan should show "existing grass," not "existing grass parking." Future development of the site will not credit these areas as existing parking stalls. • The plan shows five stalls existing on grass surface on the west exit road. The plan calls out six stalls. There are six stalls existing. • The existing parking on the north side of the landscape island between the driveways is shown as asphalt, when it is gravel. I have marked up a plan that shows the necessary revision needed prior to the Engineering Division authorizing issuance of the building permit. SWIMPLAN.DOC 4 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS w MAILING ADDRESS •f-%1 Z CITY 1 ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP [TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME Ir ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER o `�f�Cit�Ytt`t1 �3c� y 3Cct 477q O STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE L- 1 ),'/.i ,/J j. P1 11 -j C. ( ;�,-t i 17 Legal Description of Property - include all easements,/Z,,(,, 2 1= cr U (n w O Property Tax Account 3 RK TO �y^ t /_ 3 """ ��I Parcel No. (�j Z %✓ �' NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING 11— ® ED AADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL �D � L_I REMODEL APT. BLDG. � SIGN ❑ GRADING FENCE REPAIR CYDS. II_x_FT) DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUB/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY ❑ RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: �• J`• t7 NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS STORIES UNITS NUMBER BE DONE ATTACH PLOT PLAN) USE ZONE PERMIT NUMBER 6 ®z C +J JOB ADDRESS �r,�r/( 0 , 7 J^� � � SUITE/APT k LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. I LID NO. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd I ❑ PROPOSED Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ ❑ IL METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED w a YES ❑ NO ❑ 3 REMARKS Z Ir w z 0 Z w ENGINEERING MEMO DATED SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ALLOWED I PROPOSED I COMPLETE IEXE VARIANCE OR CU EXP I PLANNING REVIEW BY REVIEWED BY REVIEWED BY ADS NO. ,HORELINE M DATE 'SETBACKS — FEET REAR I HEIGHT I LOT COVERAGE FRONT BY ITYPE OF SPECIAL INSPECTOR AHtA OCCUPANT REQUIRED YES LOAD REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER USC 305 DESCRIBE WO :: HC' FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED I VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING 71 HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING PLUMBING' rg s•••• Plan Check No. MECHANICAL` This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY, Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. GRADINGIFILL STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his Or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." ENO. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ....— 1 hereb acknowled a that I have read this application• that the y g information given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED 1 + I DEPARTMENT CITY OF OF 'S 1 RE CfATE + DIVI CALL FOR ELEASED B DATE ATTENTION INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR Owwo 7711L ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor (7 Z Z Z 5 a 10?.R7 ' CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION J0s SUITE/A Ttr ADDRESS / � y : -7 1 OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS t {-^•,,.}♦.={fL,.;,(',,;t.,, '"': •It g.� •; -;':-.. 1'„ �` �. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. w MAILING ADDRESS a .: z 3 o I. i.... -- t(.• i^� PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER RW Permit Required ❑ f n.C.1 CIS !. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ s. PROPOSED Inspection Required ❑ NAME Sidewalk Required ❑ 1j It' e {� t•��_ �^ �y;, S F f METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED Q ' w ADDRESS YES ❑ NO ❑ t� t EE 1X Jil1 'JC_.,,4it Fx {- REMARKS Z a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER ( r �I 4111)1j 0 Q 517'� Fo 6E Ply 0\r— Sz��P ' Z . (.� AV NAME e t i w ADDRESS O H 9 1 r�... ENGINEERING,MEMO DAT EVI ED BY r•„ Q CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER t-Y "^� ��" O g ��'';` '✓� . {:'-fYC:,J.. t".� " I a.,. } FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY w U •,,• STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE ' Ii ' T a11L..C. " SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADB NO. Legal Description Of Property include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT p}.ff ( +.�+� I .•M SHORELINE N ai .•` EXP ii q� ^ i I VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING, REVl W BY ^� r DATE � ,: ,- w <. 'i_�v b' -.f: 6i.. 1� SETBACKS — FEET - HEIGHT I LOT COVERAGE _ Z _ ✓.AJv.�- F .'.,.lr::: Property .. �7 ,�.- ,,.-„"' FRONT �-.� SIDE I rah REAR�C, .,+"" !'-;� ,,,,:'7 �.�/ �"",r. .-� Z a Tax Account - Parcel No. ;4v'...° i° " .l ". +..: ...t#. REMARKS ' NEW RESIDENTIAL,'; , , PLUMBING RADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REMODEL ❑ APT. BLDG. L_J SIGN GRA ING FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRU ION OCCUPANT GRO REPAIR ^� CYDS. (_—x_FT) ICODE��ff WOODSTOVE HOT T B SPA DEMOLISH INSERT r INSPECTORPOOL SPECIAL AREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED ❑ YES GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT RENEWAL REMARKS ROCKERY � z Q (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC .305 Z NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL •g' o OF DWELLING /' ( AREAS ��j NUMBER STORIES UNITS DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) IFT FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED 9 A ,r K ,2±ar,.VALUATION ^r�• FEE . PLAN CHECK FEE 4CR �r�� I&Aralve le HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING PLUMBING r Plan Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE ` Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse,. heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE w successors in interest, agrees.to.indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, 'Washington, its officials, i employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of a whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance = of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT / modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance ° nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision.""" •7 I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, n;fperson will be employed i violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of thw8tate of WaW1hgt6•n relating,t F orkmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insu,rAncD and,R(�1 '18°27. {' INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATURE (OWNER,09"AGEN.T) !"/ 1 {' SIGNED f,. '•pEPARTMENT O I I 'S SI ATURE DATE JDATE CITY OF EDMONDS ' ATTENTION CALL FOR RELE ED DATE INSPECTION , s_ IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR - 0220 ORIGINAL File YELLOW Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC — — CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor ' t0Y•B7 ` CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS w MAILING ADDRESS O�..� �•.i �i... •{ j z `p tT f':or 1t11 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME �p A r y� }� t ,�•'? w ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME W i � (::.rig ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE o f -1- ' Legal Description of Property - include all easements USE ZONE ADDRESS NUMB R`•/ ,�- su are] E PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req d ❑ Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ ❑ PROPOSED a: METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED Lu YES ❑ NO ❑ 3 rj REMARKS Z w w z ENGINEERING MEMO SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED I PROPOSED I COMPLETE IEXEMPT I r EXP t VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE c w f;.�! •t`! `xt•� S •} -7 V-P.-4a is £ L ,. !� . SETBACKS — FEET FRONT SIDE REAR HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE Property Tax Account 3 Parcel No. REMARKS t NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING © ADDITION El COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REMODEL APT. BLDG. El SIGN .+. CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION .�_/r�". ,-!'a( CODE Q / OCCUPANT GROUP CI REPAIR ❑ GRADING � FENCE CYDS. (x_FT) DEMOLISH INSERT WOODSTOVE SWIMHOT TUB SPA ❑ a GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED 13 YES AREA - OCCUPANT LOAD REMARKS CARPORT ROCKERY El RENEWAL PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBCi 305 (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: w NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL O OF DWELLING AREAS to STORIES I UNITS NUMBER O DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) `-. ;. `.,L•f;.i: �� ff � ��t" FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING ' I HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING 0 fi"�ff+E�•" /0 PLUMBING Pian Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. GRADINGIFILL STATE SURCHARGE _ 6 Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold I harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." ENG. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE , I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application' that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES ThIS application is not a permit until ed thereby, no,person Wlll,be employed in, violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the.State of, Wa§hington'relating'fli Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and-RCV1! 18:27: INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. ,; DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT IS1,GN—ATTU,R-E..(.OW-NERIO,5-rAGENTI ;� SIGNATURE DATE DIMONDS g�9 ATTENTION CALL FOR INSPECTION ALE "E /B PATE J IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE t UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771 O2ZO ORIGINAL —File YELLOW —Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 1n9A1 TM NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL' FINISH GRADE-\ L. 2Unmyawm 1 �E ISTM CARACaE off `- UNDI5TURBI=D EARTH `FIR FABRIC (MIRAFI-140N OR EQUAI-) 4" LTEDIA. PERFORATED PIPE "— 3/4" TO 1-1/211 DIA. WASHED GRAVEL BOTTOM TO eF- LF-VE , INFLTRATICNTRENCH GROSS SECTION n 5Ca1-e: No, TO some a•b' NATURAL LANDSCAPED AREA TO REMAIN N EXI TING TENNIS CO JRTS I E,X14TING TMNNIS OBSERVATION PIPE rntex^tnn'r=r1 Oi»t~-=A1-1=n 1 In--•. W/5UMF' $ TEE ----10' MIN. - GRASS SWALE INFILTRATION . CROSS low, SCALE, NOT TO 6C;ALE EXPANDED DECK 646.45' . L DSCAPE SCREEN POOL 5T DECK till EXPANDED POOL 511_0�r fl MEc14 } I MEN o Q �LC �o Yo � .... QQ S Y V-1 "~5 7 5 F VOL vp " o--109 TRASH FL EXISTING GRA55 AREA a,0 2- TO REMAIN 4 WOM N -- O ADD POOL ACCE55 Rk6T>� 0caM ADD ALDA EXISTING CABANA --.-.. � ...POOL DECK - 'g3 p,SF E�QSTING 6" SIDE :SEWER (TO REMAIN CTIVE) 51 TF. 00"t. AN 5CALF-= NOT TO SCALE JOINTS IN Ff I -TER FABRIC MATERIAL SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE. SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS STAPLER, WIRE• RINGS, OR EQUAVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS.. 1. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. 2"x2" SY 14 GA. . WIRZ OR EQUIVALENT, IF 2. IF CONCENTRATED FLOW$ ARE EVIDENT UPI -FILL OF STANDARD 5TR NCTH FABRIC USED. -- THE FENCE, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED AND FILTER FABRIC CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND.. 3. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CHECK. THE UPHILL (SIDE OF THE FENCE FOR SIGNS OF THE FENCE CLOGGING AND ACTING AS A BARRIER TO FLOW AND THEN GAUS.ING CHANNELIZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO - 'MAX. THE. FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS, REPLACE THE, FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT 15 ra INCHES HIGH. 5. IF THE FILTER FABRIC (GEOTEXTILE) HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED. 6. THE POOL DECK DRAINS, WILL BE PIPED TO THE $0' FILTER FAf5RIC FENCE5 SHALL. BI= INSTALLED LONG INFILTRATION TRENCH. SEE DETAIL ALONG CONTOUR Wh4ENEVER'~'055iBLE. 91- 1 SILT FENGE DETAIL SCALE NOT to SCALE `-MINIMUM 4"x4" TRENGi-f — BACKFILL TRENCH.WITH NATIVE SOIL OR 3/4 - I Y2" WASHED GRAVEL. 7 �---21'x4" WOOD POST, STEEL FENCI= POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUAVALENT. 2' MIN. ONE WAY 1-0" +/. ONE WAY Z/TYE I CATCH BASION�� H OILS ONTROL TEE M* 50' LONG INFILTRATION TRFNCH (SEE DETAIL) - q�a SHALLOW GRASS SWAL , A-1 I A -I m Owv- rzoevem sc S7 EXISTING ORNEWAY5 TO REMAIN EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO REMAIN t----FILTER? FABRIC SILT' tb o \IV FENCING (SEE DETAIL) U � o� PARCEL NO. 27053600301900 ZONING: RS - 8 BUILDING SIZE: 1,914 SF ADDITIONAL : 524 SF '`i othing in this per[nit approval piveess shall be interpreted ae, allowing or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconform .na or mpermitted building, structure or site eoarditiun whi; is outside Uie scope of the �t eppliattion, regard- egs of`whether such ng, 3taugturs or condition is shown on the siteplan or dmwing. Such bading, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate AnforcGms.�z� ta�,t.l.a�..'' NTAC`I" OLYMPIC VIEW. WATLR185WER DISTRICT (L us 4 -I'iCaHTI INE MATERIAL SD�R 36 n S H 40 H.1 FA10 MNCt OWNER1CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION'..1^ONT201 AND DAMAGE ,APPROVE AS NOTEU BY ENNEERI G 'PR0VW BY PLANNING JnUJA. RECEIVED IyI<�1R � f ,� . 'T iZf193.C3ING ad:-PARTir EW CITY of• inmlolVDS Don Carey & Associates Aquatic Design Consultant 2302 R Street S.E. # 58 Phone: (253) 804-4470 Fax: (253) 887-7938 2270 R GIS^ T XI)M CT LG4R0. E STATE of WASHINGTON REVISIONS 1. 06/04/08 2. 03/07/09 S"( OMM )SEN"L AS Iguil .--r Overall Site Flan NATIVE SOIL 15ACKFILL FINISH GRADE F-XIST1NG GRADE 6" �11N. UNDISTURBED EARTH FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI-14taN OR EQUAL)) *� o 1 "0 0 �p °�? 4" DIA. PERFORATED PIPE " ;cam 3/4" TO 1-1/2" DIA. WASHED GRAVEL LY2_O„ 15OTTOM TO BE LEVEL INFLTRATION TRENCH O i N SCALFE= NOT TO SC,ALF- - - NATURAL LANDSCAPED AREA TO REMAIN SII T FENCE MAINTENANCE. STANDARDS I. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRI=D IMMEDIATELY. 2. IF CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCE, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED AND CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. 3. IT 15 IMPORTANT TO CHECK THFE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FI NCE FOR SIGNS OF THE FENCE CLOGGING AND ACTING AS A BARRIER To FLOW AND THEN CAUSING CHANNEL IZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS, REPLACE THE FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVI~D WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS 6 INCHES HIGH. 5, IF THE FILTER FABRIC (GEOTI=XTILE) HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED. Eo, THE POOL DECK DRAINS WILL 51~ PIPED TO THE 50' LONG INFILTRATION TRENCH. SEE DETAIL -1 -1 s EXISTING TENNIS COURTS EXI$TING TEJNNIS O-BSERVATION PIPE ,q 4"PVC PERFORATED PIPE GRATED LID T 6 "-- --_• o-D.p-o•p-D•p-o•p-D.p-o•p-o•p-A•p-D LEVEL IN s e e o a o o e e e • • o • FE w •O 0.O O• O.O O.O O.O O.O O•p D•e O•o O•p O•p D•o A•o O � o a o o _� e••0 000p r.eo o0O0°•o•0ODop •••e oOO••e s•e Do0e•Oe o e O•o es O•o o •o D••Oo ••eAo ••• 06460 • op •e OD••pp •r OO.•Oo ••o pDA•••OOo •ao pOOe•. DOo •es pOOM ESH wo•D•eO+ •o •0 oO GwRCG E` p O.Oa Oe• e e e • • e e A WASHED ROCK TYPE I CB 1 !611 - 3/41 W/SUMP $ TEE ZP 0' MIN_ INFILTRATION TRENCH GROSS DETAIL SCALE NOT TO SCALE poo � o>�c�t St�r�•� EXPANDED DECKS (Tye) 19 L NDSCAPE SCREI*N POOL 5T DECK f" -r EXPANDED POOL ul z ll.l 0 IL Ii w EXISTING GRASS AREA TO REMAIN 0 EXISTING CABANA-- _ 7 5 F ADD POOL ACCESS POOL DEC MECH MEN o, a c f�sT �il•I TRASH 46 " =/- ADI7 ADA I RESTRO0,11 EXISTING rot SIDE SEWER (TO REMAI ACTIVE) 9ftiL '% P1.0 *Ilt 1.6valuf% of vlwM u065 fbA 100(VtZIL - 1Dt m0S • Cowt� '� n1 D5 C TF. Fl. N SCALF_= NOT TO SCALF- �rrrrrrrw■r■r■rr■■■urrllr■urr � ' —� — ` �.— � I ■rrurrr■a■■rrrr■rrPnitrr■rr �uuruurrrruron ■urrrrr. r■w■r■■rr■rrwwrrr■r•rurrrr•I -•u■rorerrrirr#wwr. efl■w■rr, +.r■rrrrr■rr■rrrrrra.r�rrrrr+r _ NOTIr: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE, SILT FENCE 0400TAIL SCALE.NOT TO SCALE 11NIMUM 4"x4" TRENCH 3ACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIVE TOIL OR 3/4" - I !�" WASHED GRAVEL. "x4" WOOD POST, STEEL FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUAVALENT. P ONE WAY 24'-0" +/- ONE WAY TYPE i CATCH BASION' WITH OIL CONTROL TF-5 50' LONG INFILTRATION TRENCH (SEE DETAIL) - CoU, 01(oM 61F r��� 1De tzua�f� sue• acmes SHALLOW GRASS SWALE 5 GRASS SWALE - �1b tP�9i 'd1ouS 00A PA'R Nb� W1 $fttk, OtiA+b ?a I�,��P�Cioe•► s�s1 . SMIAP.i Y�1aR CCS S'(nRM Vdfl'S1� C� S�A��>�i IN51•A ArS 4G,4004 3 t*7 Lu V/ s -- EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO REMAIN EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO 'R;:MAIN, FILTER FA5RIC SILT FENCING (SEE D1=TAIL) PARCEL NO. 27033600301900 ZONING: MUILDING SIZE: 1,914 SF ADDITIONAL SF: 524 SF `Nothing in this permit approval process shall be interpreted as allowing or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconforming or urpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the permit application, regardless of whether such building, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate enforcement action." CONTACT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER/SEWER DISTRICT lnoR 59WIM 1NSP����oNS ACCEPTABLE TIOHTLINE MATERIAL SDR 35 SCH 40 N-12 F810 KkNCOF OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE APPHOVED AS NOTED BY E' G Date: Zone _' Setbtbacks'$ — Carner�Flag `. acs R aired `--- Front �j Sides � 2•� ual Rear IV Other APPROVED BY PLANNING 03•(�•p9 --- u.................... Don Carey & Associates Aquatic Design Consultant 2302 R Street S.E. # 58 Phone: (253) 804-4470 Fax: (253) 887-7938 2270 R!~GI$T( RED LMnnpRE CT AR D. SfAYlr Of WASHINGTON l J, . N REVISIONS 1. 06/04/08 2. 03/07/09 Overall Site Plan alp N1AR 0 9 2&99 BUILDING DEPARTMEN-1 CITY OF cD?l'2h.Ci; 9��� f� 3a f (����- �'1S�s ,��� � Ln� 01 ��"/O- boc�� NATIVE •5ACKFILL- FINISH II=11 II I►Rlj�`j�4j�`j�`j�" UNDISTURBED EARTH FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI-14ON OR EQUAL) 4" DIA. PERFORATED PIPE 3/4" TO 1-1/2" DIA. WASHED GRAVEL BOTTOM TO BE LEVEL INFILTRATION TRENCH CROSS SECTION SGALE: NOT TO SCALE NATURAL LANDSCAPED AREA TO REMAIN SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE STANDARDS I. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. 2. IF CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCE, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED AND CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. 3. IT IS IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FENCE FOR SIGNS OF THE FENCE CLOGGING AND ACTING AS A BARRIER TO FLOW AND THEN CAUSING CHANNELIZATION OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS, REPLACE THE FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS ro INCHES HIGH. 5. IF THE FILTER FABRIC (GEOTEXTILE) HAS DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN, IT SHALL BE REPLACED. EX OBSERVATION PIPE A //-4"PVC PERFORATED PIPE GRATED LID -\ GRASS SWALE 0 0 oe-o.e-o•o-o•e-o•e-o•e-o.e-e �� •' • e • LEVEL •o•o• •o o•o o. o•o o•e o•e o.o o•o o•o o•o o•o o•o o•o o•o 0 •o•o•o•o•o•o•o•o FINE •o•e•o•e• " . e •e•o•e•o•e•o.e•o•e•o•e•o:;.. . • o•o o.o . . . • . o.o o•o o.o o•o o.o • • • o•o o.o o.o o•e o MESH •o o•o o• • e o.o o•o •o o•e o•e o•e o•e o•e o•e o.o o•e o.o o•o o•o . . • • SCREEN • • • o.e o.o • . • e . o.o o•o o.e o. o.o o•e o.o o.e o•e o A WASHED ROCK TYPE I CB 1 !611 - 3/411 W/SUMP $ TEE 0' a' M K- INFILTRATION TmNCH EGROSS DETAIL. SCALE NOT TO SCALE MMERNOWNSPOUTS TO CONNECT 'c EXIST. T31 EXPANDED DECK g"_011 64ro.45' LANDSCAPE SCREEN TRASH EX. RAISED ST DECK _/- ADD D _ EXPANDED POOL RE T OOMS r U W O a U -- tU EXISTING GRASS AREA TO REMAIN u0 EXISTING CABANA c ADD POOL ACCESS EX. RAISED DECK MECH S MENPARKING EXISTING Q LOBBY 0, W. EXISTING 0 PA;;a N CnCI, E E 64'- "+/- ONE WAY WAOIN3 ADD ADA RESTROOM EOGE EXIST - 110001.I EXISTING 6" SIDE SEWER (TO REMAIN ACTIVE) 5O' LONG INFILTRATION TRENCH (SEE DETAIL) - SITE FLAN �I Itl SC: ALF-: NOT TO SCALFE JOINTS IN FILTER FA51C MATERIAL SHALl- BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUAVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO - POSTS. - - -sA. WIRE • - EQUIVALENT, liiiiriiii.i.iiiiriir......ri■ STANDARD STRENGTH ■■■iii ilr iiii ii■■iii■■Iliii■■f liiii■■iiiii■■iiiiii■■Iliii■■. ■iiiiiiiiiiiiii iiii. illiiiiit ....................�1..... FILTER FABRIC ■iiiiiiiiiii ii iiii. il;iiii■ ' MAX. NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SILT FENCE DETAIL, SC,ALFE: NOT TO SCALE MINIMUM *K4" TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NATIYE 7 SOIL OR 3/4" - 1 %" WASHED GRAVEL. \-2'k4" WOOD POST, STEEL FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUAVALENT. ONE WAY ' -011 +/ '— SHALLOW GRASS SWALE TYPE 1 CATCH BASION WITH OIL CONTROL TEE OWNER/CON",''ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION 1,30NTRfIL AND DRAINAGE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO REMAIN EXISTING DRIVEWAYS -TO-REMAIN---- _ __-- CONTAOT OLYMPIC VIEW WATER/SEWER DISTRICT FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCING (SEE DETAIL) PARCEL NO. 27033600301900 ZONING: RS - 8 BUILDING SIZE: 1,914 SF ADDITIONAL SF: 524 SF LObOkk ?VOkib JPQ(,iIill City of Edmonds Building Department a I w �j 1 15010 1 M I 1i I w I W1 I 01• l3•9--009 RPPHOVED BY PLANNING � . ���Mti l 0.30 • DES Cone 125 --cz5 Corner Flag Setbacks Required c ual Front rj v5 > 2C2 Sides (IN "�•5 _ y?•5 Rear t`I 15 > t 5 Other Height 125 lot AP 0 AS NOTED INEERING I� ro C STREET mLE Dat . s PARKING SPACES REQ'D v — PARKING SPACES PROPOSED N I L BARRIER FREE PARKING SPACES RECEIVED OCT 13 2008 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Don Carey & Associates Aquatic Design Consultant 2302 R Street S.E. # 58 Phone: (253) 804-4470 Fax: (253) 887-7938 L EXPIRES ' PERMIT ONLY Cn 0 Cn =3 .- � O C O -I11—r QD A—m CD �- CD- � ftf a) E C/) Cn cu V� 00 `', Cn CU C C®i O 0 Cn C: �e Iv— w ror advz �&no( sc -i per- see, p-1 00 . REVISIONS 1. 06/04/08 Site Plan ST-T FILE -i�a RECEIVED, OCT 13 2008 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS M Project Statistics Address: 10307 238th. Street S.W. Lot -Coverage: Site = 106,672 sq.ft. Edmonds, Washington Buildings = 2,680 sq.ft. Legal.. Description: The East 1 /2 of the West 1 /2 Percent coverage = 2.5% of the N.W. Quarter of the N.E. Quarter of the S.W. Quarter of Building Setbacks: Front Yd. @.230'-4", (new) Section 36; Township 27; Range 3; Snohomish Country Side Yard - 7'-0", (exist.) Tax..Number: 362703-3-09-0007 Building.Areas. Site -Area: 106,672 sq.ft. Exist Building: 1,636 sq.ft. Zoning:. RS - 8, (exist. non-conforn;ing) New Addition: 254 sq.ft. Occupancy: B Remodeled area: 302 sq.ft. Const. Type: Type V-N Total Building: 1,890 sq.ft. Building_ Height: 12'-6" a tq, � f3}ti aR2 7 1�J ` -] V C r r�. 'T-_A 1 71 nil i 0 M �'a W - SITE L - 1 " = 20'-0" Project Statistics Address: 10307 238th. Street S.W. Lot Coverage. Site = 106,672 sq.ft. Edmonds, Washington Buildings = 2,680 sq.ft. Legal Description: The East 1/Z of the West 1/2 Percent coverage = 2.5% of the N.W. Quarter of the N.E. Quarter of the S.W. Quarter of Building Setbacks: Front Yd. = 230'-4", (new) Section 36; Township 27; Range 3; Snohomish County Side Yard = 7'-0", (exist.) Tax Number: 362703-3-09-0007 Building_Areas: Site Area: 10 6,6 72 sq.ft. Exist Building: 1,636 sq.ft. Zoning: RS - 8, (exist. non -conforming) New addition: 254 sq.ft. Occupancy: B Remodeled area: 302 sq.ft. Const. Type: Type V-N Total Building: 1,890 sq.ft. Building Height: 12'-611 STREET FI P", r aPOO C � "CS C C�3 u cU 00 J 4L/ T3 �l ("""� • r-t l i i P4 ON �WON lip E err i i 0 7 0-3 0 57-Sw