Loading...
10308 240TH PL SW.PDFiiiiiiiiiiii 4281 10308 240TH PL SW TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) 246t-� PLaW � �_..XW-We CRITICAL AREAS : q V ~V 2 vy DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver XStudy Required Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: V -�— 12 - t SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: 06 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File ChecklisLdoc )JECT ADDRESS / OWNERS: KEVIN TENNY & MELISSA MABEY 10308 2401H PL SW EDMONDS 206 - 533 - 0138 ACCOUNT No: 5650 - 000 .- 009 - 0401 AL DESCRIPTION: BEG AT POINT ON THE EASTERLY LI NE NE OF LOT 9, H. K. SCHROEDER'S FOREST LANE ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOL 170F PLATS PG 46 THAT IS NORTH 16 47" 09" WEST 95.03 FT FROM THE SE CORNER THEREOF: THENCE CONTINUING N 16 47' 09" WEST 125.77 FT THENCE N 12 55" 00" EAST 12.95 FT THENCE N 50 45' 18" WEST 58.03 FT THENCE S 10 15' 21" WEST 167.38 FT 10 THENCE S 10 15' 21" WEST 167.38 FT THENCE S 28 08" 12" EAST 55.45 FEET THENCE N 61 51" 48" EAST 93.01 FEET TO THE TPOB. (ALSO KNOWN AS Parcel A OF SHORT PLAT No: SP5 (1-82) RECORDED UNDER REC. No: 8302090214. SEY.SW'/.SEC 36,T27N R3E SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. E: RS-8 31ZE: 14. 086 SO FT OVERAGE: EXISTING: 1015 SQ FT RESIDENCE y 450 SQ 1456 SQ FT 10.4 . PROPOSED: 1015 EXIST. 888. NEW HT: A 1`j03TOTAL NEW 1?� IoZ. B lot' C lot' • D IO Z' AVERAGE rOZ + 25 FT ACTUAL: IZH 3'�2i, ALLOWABLE: ' 'DING: NONE i 10 GU • YD5 : GAS F/A TACT: KRISTIN HANSON HANSON DESIGN 652 ALDER ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 3415 425 - 774 - 7129 425 - 771 -3152 FAX 0".250 GAF -A, (D 9 • 7,5 0 uF1'Ele 44. IV UFFM v1 RECEIVEE) JUN 2 9 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS q(p r i' 14 v- A Lof _jLf r�.✓�Z P�3v��/s�y� Fvf� ,�2fr�-vaGc� A-AJ6 6eeS&->a/ 6- A/'�o L I 1 i'A IZ C E LL I Lc,— I \0 k LOT '�u APPROVED BY PLANNING \ LOT 3� 9 ExI1�110G 4'-0" Q E-TA I N I QCj WALL- 1157 i Z o DA-T011 F0E ED110NV7 t I, * WE OF poi ,JDgIZAD1=• I �q,l� ro I DO.O 2 / 10 pD �r4- H ITA E. PL io Zp'- O' z M - - .. JUN 2 9 1999 City of Edmonds DEVELOOpMENTESERVIC S CTR. Critical Areas Determination Ds Applicant: Kevin Tenny & M. A. Mabey Determination #: CA-98-230 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 10308 2401h Pl. SW Property Tax Acct #: 5650-000-009-04 Project Description: non -project specific A site inspection has revealed a site which appears to contain or be adjacent to slopes of 40% or greater with a vertical elevation change of more than 20 feet. Based on the above findings, it is determined that there is potentially a steep slope critical area on or adjacent to the site. A Critical Areas Study is required to delineate the boundaries of this potential critical area, the buffers and setbacks. For the steep slopes, a licensed surveyor mutt,.. create a topographic map of the site that indicates all areas that slope 40%or more and have a vertical ain of 20 feet or ore within the 40% slopes. The map must also show the location of t e steep slope buffers and setbacks. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to t e Planning epartment or review. the Planning Depar'tnrent finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. Steve Bullock Name October 1, 1998 Date M - ., • • �i8-ZJO City of Edmonds CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application fo.r the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject propem. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps; or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her, representative, must fill out the checklist; sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please Subn"ilt a ylcinity snap along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Its,— Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date c:raccpcion\jana\cact.doc (over) M ' ) • Q �7 C.4 FILE N0. v Jy Critical Areas Checklist - ----------------------------- Site Information (soils/topographv/hydrology/vegetation) i. Site Address,Location: t %� LPL% (��. d•`% Z. Property Tax Account Number: J �_ L 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Yz /gelZ_(�r ?. Is this site currently developed? k ves; no. If ves; how is site developed? < orlt 4,72 C-kl-t2 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. _ Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I0-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). _ Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 304'o ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): i C? C i� ,I ►1. G 7 8 Site contains areas of year-round standing water: NO ; Approx. Depth: Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: 10C ; Approx. Depth: _ What season(s) of the year? {' Site is in the floodway �OC) floodplain- of awater course. 9. Site eontains,a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds sur-face? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? /L.' (What time of year' ), 10. Site is primarily: forested �; meadow shrubs : mixed - urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) ('&f pce: I __rl,r{.r 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: �. -, ---- ---= -- - - -- For City Staff Use Only - - -_ _ --- - I Site is Zoned? 2.:. SCSmapped soil type(s)?. rr oua-µme$ LSc1 e2,r'w: Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates Nvetlaad present on site? 4. Critical areas inventoryor C.A. map:. indicates Criticai.Area on sites 5... : Site, within designated earth subsidence �landsI de hazard area? 6� Site: designated on the Environmentally Sensitive:,ki -Mao? "' o Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer June4, 1999 RECEIVEr) •���291999 City of Edmonds DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. c/o Hanson Design STREET FILECITY OF EDMONDS 652 Alder Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation - Tenney /• Mabey House Addition 10308 - 240th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington This engineering report responds the results of a geotechnical evaluation with regard to the proposed Tenney / Mabey house addition at 10308 - 240th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington. Specifically, the issue of slope stability with regard to the existing concrete retaining wall was addressed. REFERENCES: • Property survey and slope topography by Continental Engineering Company, dated November 20, 1998 • Proposed house addition site plan for Tenney and Mabey by Hanson Design • Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E., dated June 2, 1999 The existing Tenney / Mabey residence at 10308 - 240th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington, exists at the base of a 2H:1 V slope. This slope contains dense mature fir trees and grasses. No evidence of any geotechnical distress was observed: No slides, no sloughing, no soil creep, nor any erosional degradation was observed. At the base of the rear (easterly) slope, an approximately three and one-half foot (35) high concrete retaining wall exists. This retaining wall is approximately four feet (4.0') behind the existing residence. It is understood that a carport structure had existed adjacent (southerly) of the residence. The carport has recently been demolished. The proposed house addition project will occur in the zone of the former carport, and extend slightly westerly beyond the existing house line (see Hanson Design sketch). The geotechnical issue involves the condition of the slope, the retaining wall, and the proposed location for the house addition. It is understood that the proposed new house addition will be exactly in the same eastern alianment as the existing house. In other words, the proposed addition will be a minimum of two to three feet (2' to 3') away from the existing retaining wall. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 I r + Hanson Design 2 9 1999 Re: Tenney / Mabey VEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. Page two CITY OF EDMONDS The existing retaining wall shows no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No cracking, no shifting, no buckling or bulging was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on this engineer's on -site geotechnical evaluation and experience with similar properties, the following are concluded and recommended: • The rear slope and existing concrete retaining wall behind the Tenney / Mabey residence is neotechnically approved. No evidence of any geotechnical distress was observed. • The proposed house addition will not affect the existing concrete retaining wall and slope. The proposed addition is geotechnically approved when constructed in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements, approved plans, and normal, good practices. • No special geotechnical engineering or inspection is required jf the rear (easterly) wall of the proposed addition is a minimum of two to three feet (2' to 3') away from the existing concrete retaining wall. • It is presumed that drainage controls will comply with City of Edmonds requirements. • This engineer did observe a small (approximately two to three foot high) exposed soil cut at the southern end of the existing concrete retaining wall. It is recommended that a small rockery or keystone block wall be placed to prevent minor surficial erosion. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. I Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer PLANNING DATA NAME: SITE ADDRESS:'02jD' /74o` ;ATE: /v ZONING: 9�2 - PLAN CHK#: �� �/� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: -I �Otq /N(,/ a,49A& CORNER LOT I 00 (Yes/No) SETBACKS: FLAG LOT (Yes/No) I �`1- �� U0 2 L-� Required Setbacks: Front7� Left Side:-M� Right Side: ��Rear:_� Actual Setbacks: Front:22ja' Left Side:_! (o Right Side: 7 -'5' Rear: Z� Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED 14 (YIN) LOT COVERAGE: a .Maximum Allowed:560/0 Actual: 10.40 � BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: v Actual Height:_ m -i Datum Point: TDL'IF7 Datum Elevation: % C-YO A.D.U. CREATED?: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: d 0 SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT OTHER: Plan Review By: �. f c% llalpamiA"plandu.dw rf aV_ t' Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer ne 4, 1999 STRE,E1 -11uRECE�vED • %� 2 9 1999 City of Edmonds awry PY EVE C2Ty O TE�M�N SS CTR. c/o Hanson Design 652 Alder Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Subject: G.eotechnical Evaluation - Tenney / Mabey House Addition F10308 - 240th Place S.W.,,1Edmonds, Washington This engineering report responds the results of a geotechnical evaluation with regard to the proposed Tenney / Mabey house addition at 10308 - 240th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington. Specifically, the issue of slope stability with regard to the existing concrete retaining wall was addressed. REFERENCES: Property survey and slope topography by Continental Engineering Company, dated November 20, 1998 Proposed house addition site plan for Tenney and Mabey by Hanson Design Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E., dated June 2, 1999 The existing Tenney / Mabey residence at 10308 - 240th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington, exists at the base of a 2H:1 V slope. This slope contains dense mature fir trees and grasses. No evidence of any geotechnical distress was observed: No slides, no sloughing, no soil creep, nor any erosional degradation was observed. At the base of the rear (easterly) slope, an approximately three and one-half foot (35) high concrete retaining wall exists. This retaining wall is approximately four feet (4.0') behind the existing residence. It is understood that a carport structure had existed adjacent (southerly) of the residence. The carport has recently been demolished. The proposed house addition project will occur in the zone of the former carport, and extend slightly westerly beyond the existing house line (see Hanson Design sketch). The geotechnical issue involves the condition of the slope, the retaining wall, and the proposed location for the house addition. It is understood that the proposed new house addition will be exactly in the same eastern alignment as the existing house. In other words, the proposed addition will be a minimum of two to three feet (2' to 3') away from the existing retaining wall. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 RECEIVED Hanson Design Re: Tenney / Mabey Page two x: 2 9 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS The existing retaining wall shows no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No cracking, no shifting, no buckling or bulging was observed. Based on this engineer's on -site geotechnical evaluation and experience with similar properties, the following are concluded and recommended: • The rear slope and existing concrete retaining wall behind the Tenney / Mabey residence is aeotechnically approved. No evidence of any geotechnical distress was observed. • The proposed house addition will not affect the existing concrete retaining wall and slope. The proposed addition is aeotechnically approved when constructed in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements, approved plans, and normal, good practices. • No special geotechnical engineering or inspection is required jtthe rear (easterly) wall of the proposed addition is a minimum of two to three feet (2' to 3') away from the existing concrete retaining wall. • It is presumed that drainage controls will comply with City of Edmonds requirements. • This engineer did observe a small (approximately two to three foot high) exposed soil cut at the southern end of the existing concrete retaining wall. It is recommended that a small rockery or keystone block wall be placed to prevent minor surficial erosion. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer r ol HANSON DESIGN KRISTIN HANSON 652 ALDER STREET EDMONDS, WA 98020 RE: 10308 240.. PL SW EDMONDS CA - 98-230 RECEIVED JUN 2 9 IS99 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS JUNE 28, 1999 I AM REQUESTING THIS P ROJECT BE FX AAPT FROM ANY CRITICAL AREA CONSIDERATION. THE ADDITION WILL NOT TOUCH, HARM OR PESTER WITH THE EXISTING SLOPE, RETAINING WALLS OR DRAINAGE. THE ADDITION WILL NOT CAUSE INSTABILITY. ATTACHED IS A LETTER FROM DENNIS BRUCE, P.E. STATING HIS PROFESSIONAL OPINION. THANK YOU. YO U RS ho" KRISTIN HANSON. NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). 4; PERMIT EXPIRES -1USE PERMIT � -� 1 CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE - NUMBER 51004 64 EWF STRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS 10 3O /2_I1 /� NAME OF BUSINESS G T (� 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. ESS A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP 7ESCP Approved 0-RW Permit Required ❑ ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING — REQUIRED DEDICATION �� Street Use Perm# Req' ❑ tA)f/ O "M 0/ Inspection Required ^O PROPOSED Sidewalk Required NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED 0 YES ❑ NO ❑ Z z ADDRESS REMARKS r ,s W CITY O ZIP TELEPHONE 21 I2 7 d 12. --- NAME P— r �/ V ✓ .r�%/� l ✓/ ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY or ADDRESS FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY w cc Q LL CITY TELEPHONE O ANCE OR ADB# SHORELINE # CHECKED BY U ' V"V./aU STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE SERA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED, PROPOSED O LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - INCLUDE ALL EASEMENTS,,,m t �% P EXP a e70012DEOWLOT COVER GE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR c7 CA W v O L, l.r �a 4 PROPERTY TAX AC OUNT ARCEL NO. LOT AREA Y PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE a w _ _7 ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH REMARKS ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN FENCE ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRAD G CYDS ❑ ( X FT) CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT N GROUP J ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER C— --J SPECIAL INSPECTOR d EA OCCUPANT GARAGE L ❑ RENEWAL REQUIRED ❑ YES � LOAD # Z CARPORT 0 (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: REMARKS U PROGRESS INSPE TIONS PER UBC 108 0 oNUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF `% DWELLING r AREAS11 m O STORIES Li' UNITS r NUMBE DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE S%uD{/ n -_&) n,sn'T )ii FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE EH AT SOURCE GLAZ G % LOT S OPE BUILDING 1 PL C ECK NQ' VESTED DA E PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PER IT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO F BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE — t: SEPARATE PERMISSION. � STATE SURCHARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS STORM DRAINAGE FEES w 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE _ J IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND a ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY x o FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT )� •��/ p DEEMEDTOMODIFY,WAIVEORREDUCEANYREQUIREMENTOFANYCITYORDINANCE x NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- `'ALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and FOR INSPECTION IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIG atbRE ( R A E T DATE SIGNED 1^ (425) 0 1 S S TURE DATE ` �a�' V/ 11 i "f 771-0220 RELEASED BY DATE ATTENTION 114 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI zq ORIGINAL - FILE • YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR