The URL can be used to link to this page

107 7TH AVE N (2).PDFIIIIIIIIIIII 6891 107 7TH AVE N ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NE)G COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: 77K CRITICAL AREAS: el -re DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required tj<aiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT DRAINAGE PLAN DA PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: n L" SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED:�� STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER T CARD DATED: , OTHER: L:\TEMP\DSTs\For ;s Rest File Checklist.doc 10-7 - -4� Ave , N ,.1 CITY OF EDMONDS GGS�fi�+ 700 UMN ST. • EDMONDS, WA 9l I-02W • R.X PARKS, RECREATION AND -qc. jg9Q CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: 2-26-08 To: Rob Chave, Planning Manager From: Rich Lindsay, Parks Manager Re: 71h & Bell Street Tree Species Addendum cc: Brian McIntosh, Duane Bowman, Jeanine Graff Dave Gebetrt, Jeanie McConnell, Jennifer Machuga Rob, As per our discussion on Wednesday, February 201h regarding amending Edmonds Street Tree Plan on 7th & Bell Streets. As you know the Street Tree Plan is designed to enhance and identify downtown and surrounding areas of Edmonds with Street Trees that will fit and beautify Edmonds. After further research of previously selected tree species on 7`h Avenue and Bell Street I am recommending changing the tree selection species as listed below. Trees on 7111 Avenue between Casper's and Main Street Delete "Urbanite Ash" Trees as indicated on present Street Tree Plan on 7`h Avenue between Casper's and Main Street. Recommend "Chanticleer Pear Trees" on 7'h Avenue between Casper's and Main Street. Fifteen of these species of trees have already been planted in response to Memorial Street Tree program on 7`h Avenue. Therefore this would maintain consistency and beautify this street. "Chanticleer Pear Tree" is already recommended in the Edmonds Street Tree plan. Trees on Bell Street between 6111 Avenue and 7111 Avenue Delete "Corzam Linden" Trees as indicated on present Street Tree Plan on Bell Street between 6`h & 7`h Avenues. This particular tree grows very much like a conifer type tree which has very low branches limiting vehicle and pedestrian sight distance and would have serious maintenance implications. Recommend "Cercidiphyllum japonica" Katsura Tree on Bell Street between 6111 & 7`h Avenues which three Katsura trees have been planted on Bell Street. This would also maintain consistency on Bell Street. Katsura tree is also recommended in the Edmonds Street Tree Plan. I will update new street tree species selection on my copy of present Street Tree Plan. Any questions please contact me. Thank you, Rich Lindsay Parks Manager 2 BELL ST /-AV"` 1 - - -- -- ., 0 F E o io,_ E ti z w Q ti CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS- BUI A z::) ADDRESS SCALE 107-7AVE N HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR JIM IRWIN CAJUN CONST DATE DRAWN PERMIT 02/15/2005 BY SIBREL NO. 9956 NTS F ti Welded Joint w/1.5"-1" Reducer 1.5" Copper. BELL ST. CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS -BUILT ADDRESS: PERMIT v' 107 7TH AVE N NO - BLD20040939 CONTRACT❑R: HOME❑WNER: SCALE: J I M I RW I N I XXXXX N TS DATE INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: DATE DRAWN: DRAWN BY: 4/13/06 E. SIBREL 4/13/06 I. ABILA DATE RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS JAMES R. IRWIN W MAILING ADDRESS c 2507 N.W. 202nd STREET CITY ZIP TELEPHONE SHORELINE 98177 1 206-542-9191 NAME µI•i JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES C ADDRESS S 2507 N.W. 202nd STREET CITY ZIP TELEPHONE SHORELINE 98177 1 206-683-4592 NAME ICBL# PERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT She/j ZONE�yyj �..J9 NUMBED=O�l/"�" !f� JOB — e _ SUITE/A # ADDRESS / iI PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street use Permit Req'd EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required Sidewalk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground Wiring required METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV EQUIRED It/ ItYES NO ❑ REMARKS = 2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE /K15>-15 : lV M esZv� /2 T1l/ffiJAIV /, 9nb�A a =� .-j! ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY - DATE ADDRESS t �'" -"� j �� It S Zd0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE ,FIREREVIEWED BY"t' DATE •I°` a� ri VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBJf" INSPECTION BOND STATE LICENSE NUMBER , "•1� EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY RE POSTED ` P.DYES PkNo $ SEPA REVIEW , SIGN AREA HEIGHT' PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO COMPLETE ' EXEMPT, ALLOWED', 'PROPOSED )LOWED PROPOSED 4342-098,=,019-0002 .".�'. �...EXPQ O ® NEW _ y »a RESIDENTIAL' ® PLUMBING/MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBA KS (Fri) PROPOS D SETBACKS (FT) ALLOWED PROPOSED °r1CNTE,• 918E RDMR R 91BE?IH111 ❑ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR [ O/Q to `` ❑ • ❑ CHANGE OF USE J ll 7 ll {(jj ` J 7 h I,p ❑ REMODEL `� ® MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN.` R ' :PARKING RIDED ;.LOT AREA P NNING REVIEW Y DATE FENCE6.6..00. IIIV/� O ❑REPAIR G I CYDS � ® ( 6X) 10 F I)'V REMARKS OTHER ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY 'f:':, ❑ FIRE ALARM' (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN A NEW DUPLEX *RESIDENCE ' CHECKED BY TYPE, ST UCTION y C OCCUPA "�` GROUP NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTION AREA] OCCUPANT STORIE82+BSMT I UNITS 2 NUMBER 99-31 REQUIRED YESLOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS. _ PROGRESS.INSPECTIONS..PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D VI 9 10ONSTRUCT A NEW DUPLEX : RESIDENCE • 'AND s. m %b jF`-ai PERFORM SITE IMPROVEMENT ON THE . LAND' LEGALLY DEXCRIBED AS: Lots 19 & 20, VALUATION $ll/� DeescripUon P` FEE Description FEE 2 , , �° sZ Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % ,.. v YLOT $LOPE %;?,. — GAS 17.4 c13r. 2 - 14.0 euildirig'Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK O: VE TE DATE � e a _lumb ng Base Fee Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT 115OVEG WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN Grading (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. R Vi a w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SUP V. PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION $A 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS gIN Fire Review Plan Chk, Deposit INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE S DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due 30-79 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' 0 -1 Recording Fee Receipt # rX G VEN BIS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM T EEAD OWNER. OR THETHISTDU Y AUTHORIZED AGENTTHAT THEION OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE BOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WOR P S N INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. S NATURE WIVE DATE IGN D (425) OF L NATURW DATE 771 -0220 -ON EL D BY TE A ENT Off 1333 IT I FUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 09/03 PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR P%IF%rt A/► 1 1 A a1A \/Ae I A wr AA A e/etie/A . A 00. A PLANNING DATA . . New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects SITE ADDRESS: D 7 72- 4ve - /V. ZONING: f? /" t ^ IS 7 USES) PROPOSED: �vn�e)C ALLOWED?: `u LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED /Vo (Y/N) CUP File: . — To Allow What Uses?: ADB FILE #: IV14 PARKING: `� X Use: No. Spaces Required: X 6 5 (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees; etc.) = Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Total Required: y Actual Provided: SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: /Vd ftm6. i S Awft Side: Rlyf*Side: / Rwr: Actual Setbacks: i LC N 5 Side:' S In/ d S iht Side: Id fir: Cd Street map checked for additional setback required? Nd^f, (:es No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowed: / Actual: i drao..s "F< a" BUILDING HEIGHT: �5 + S 3a Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: a Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: w ° Datum Point: Sewt Datum Elevation: Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? r-- If so,VAR# ' z a o,, a LANDSCAPING: nGT �e l V d Matches ADB approved: l v � .... , 0 o un Bid Provided? Bond Amo(100% bid): w �r z — �^'``'v�� CRITICAL AREAS #: aY-; SEPA DETERMINATION: w; °V' a SHORELINE REQUIRED?: o Continued ... I:\I ibrary\^PlandatNewComm.doc 6 • DATE: PLAN CHK#: �' -1 — a 61 NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT:. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ✓lei... ov/1I?X ADB FILE #: /y/1f OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:"Z SUBDIVISION: LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: No REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? !-lI OTHER: �5 �o � cove"CAf t °I (lo we j ; ti 5- o� pia dS�CJ — Plan Review By: q(45) 1)ethWV I:\I i brary\^P IandatNewComm.doc As� wra,o A 4Z A�l c; T. k: CODE, 1997 -IONS, ETC. 4ERGY CODE, I I I 41.'6 cw; Ttr". 41 G - SmEr I T A' ERI L AND :ON TRACTOR ALL WORK C, ALL COMPLY j�6 COMPONENT Li _wk 7vo XMIENSIONAL AND CITY OF w kND SAFETY LABOR AND RNISTRA11014 I 06-- URISDICTION. I IT, RECORDS 7 . vj co f-7- _7 bli T THE SITE. w III . -ml t4 _7 tND ACTUALI I. ru� 12S.'s, INS OR NEED E ADEQUATE cs )IMENSIONAL 14 D. '44) )NCROR w REQUIREETE FOR 6 614 INDEX OF DM ARCHITECT IN SLEEPING A-1 SITE/ROOF PIL FULL SITE SE( kED BY FIRE NORTH TO SO CALCULATION r, GENERAL NOT o OF 5.7 SQ. 22 SHED FLOOR A-2 BASEMENT FL Za IF - ID DISPOSAL rAl 4T. A-3 FIRST FLOOR ENGINEERING t g ( NOTES- TYPE MECHANICAL t A-4 SECOND FLOC kLL HAVE u- i WHOLE HOUSE kLL GLAZING SHED FLOOR• ATTIC VENTIL 0 54-2, SEC A-5 BUILDING ELE\ TYPICAL EXTE. A-6 BUILDING CROt IS. GUARDUR LANDING EAD ' NOSING; 1 A-7 BUILDING CRO: . 41 • I. PROVIDE 4 CID STRUCTURAL kIR FLOW AT INSULATION cl S-1 FOOTING AND uj CONCRETE & S "AMERICAN NOTES & OET; .L UNITS TO Lime New 90Z Z5 S-2 GROUND FLOO PLAN, SHEAR '. DEAD BOLT I / / % i S-3 FIRST FLOOR V L EXTERIOR EL ..raw 117.6k t4. PlZok PLAN.SHEAR1 DETAILS RVATIVE OR EL 26 S _rbw -z" le 117.1U S-4 SECOND FLOOF LOCATIONS. SHEAR WALL 5 f -4 zonelm I %co ow Am A %e 1, -F/ -ECEI.VEDS STRUCTURAL ; G BEI—I.. CIVIL Soba Re lulre�', __JUN 2 82004 SITE DRAINAG ire 7a- D BY LOC16w N I "Qc I CONTOURS to PERMIT COUNTER C-2 ORIGINAL SITE ta Other EN-1 ENERGY CODE' INSULATION Rl BUILDING HEA_ V VOLT AV_e:l0_t THE WINDOW SCHE uA I um u=u 1� INTERSECTION OF 7TH AVE. N. AND BELL STREET. IT IS DESIGNATED SEWER MANHOLE 29. THE INVERT 4..__.- hkEET FILE VENTILATION BEER. FIELD ELEVATION IS 104.96. IT'S RIM ELEVEATION IS 111.72'. • SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. ® GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS November 2, 2004 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell Crty 50 S,Sqn TREET FIL5 i 13Gl=Rp4r.� � Vi01C1 RE: GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR IRWIN PROJECT AT 107 SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON At your request, we have completed a review of the temporary shoring system proposed for construction of a two -unit condominium located at 107 Seventh Avenue North in Edmonds. Documents we have reviewed include: ► Geotechnical Evaluation —Foundation Recommendations —Temporary Shoring/Proposed Duplex Project, 107 7`h Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington, dated August 19, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. ► Existing and Proposed Grading Plan for Bell Place Condominium, Sheet C-3, dated 9/26/04 by James R. Irwin and Associates. ► Revised Shoring Plan (Temporary "Eco-Block" Shoring) dated September 29, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. ► Two sections (A -A' and B-B') through the proposed condominium, showing proposed basement elevation. A series of ecology blocks has been proposed as temporary shoring for the excavation at the south end of the proposed development —next to an alley. Three rows of blocks at a 6:1 batter with a back slope above the blocks toward the alley at a ratio of 1 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (1H:1V) slope has been proposed. Ground elevation at the alley varies from 132 to 134 feet, and the proposed basement floor is 123.9 feet. Excavation depth to the bottom of the footing would range from approximately 10 to 12 feet. According to the geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E., two test pits were excavated in the alley to a depth of 7 feet. Soils observed in the test pits consisted of very dense, well - graded sands and gravels. Based on our experience, these soils are representative of those known to exist in this area of Edmonds. Groundwater was not observed after the test holes reportedly remained open for 22 hours. 400 NORTH 34TH STREET • SUITE 100 21-1-20194-001 P.O. BOX 300303 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 206.632-8020 FAX 206.695.6777 TDD: 1.800.833.6388 • 0 City of Edmonds Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell November 1, 2004 Page 2 SHANNON MASON, INC. Based on our review, the proposed ecology -block shoring system is an acceptable means of providing excavation support along the alley at 107 Seventh Avenue North. We recommend the geotechnical engineer of record observe and document to the City of Edmonds that: ► Excavation soils are similar to those observed in the test pits. ► Cut slope to construct the ecology -block shoring is stable and will not impact the adjacent alley and any critical underground utilities. ► Subgrade soils to support the block wall are suitable for bearing. ► Construction of the block wall is in accordance with geotechnical engineer's recommendations. ► Wall backfill material is acceptable (it appears that on -site sand and gravel would be suitable) and densely compacted. ► Backfill material placed above the block wall is stable at 1HAV slope, as shown on the Denis M. Bruce, P.E., detail dated September 29, 2004. A 2'/2-inch minus crushed rock would be an alternative unless the on -site soil can be compacted to the 1H:1V slope. During wet weather, the upper steep slope should be covered with plastic sheeting to control erosion. The geotechnical engineer should visit the site and document shoring wall stability' and erosion control during and after periods of heavy precipitation, e.g.,'/2 inch or more rainfall per day. We recommend the contractor establish a series of points along the alley to record vertical and lateral deformation. Readings should be taken weekly during the excavation and shoring construction, and monthly thereafter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 695-6801. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Thomas M. Gurtowski, P.E. Vice President TMG/tmg 21-1-20194-001-LR Ldoc/wpket 21-1-21094-001 GARY HAENSON CITY OF EDMONDS AKMAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 171-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT it, c . 18 oI0 Planning • Building • Engineering July 2, 2004 James R. Irwin 2507 NW 202nd Street Shoreline, WA 98117 Re: Address Correction Dear Mr. Irwin: This letter is to inform you of an address correction. The construction site for plan check 04-264 is actually in the one hundred block of 7th Avenue N. Please change 707 7th Avenue N. to 107 7th Avenue N., Edmonds. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause you and greatly appreciate your cooperation. Sincerely, ?Ma Development Services Cc: File I • Incorporated August 11,- 1890 • Sister C:itu - Hakinan..ianan DONNA L. BRESKE, P.E. 6621 Foster Slough Rd. Ph: 425-334-9980 Snohomish, WA, 98290 Fax: 425-334-7380 GRADING QUANTITY CALCULATION FOR JIM IRWIN 2-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PREPARED: AUGUST 11, 2004 SITE: 7TH & BELL EDMONDS, WA 00 5 DRAIANGE - DETENTION - INSPECTION - GRADING & TESC SEWER & WATER - FEASIBILITY - SITE DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED SEP 17 2004 PERMIT COUNTER EET FILE' • i (• /yl \" C. � E Xts77 U4 4RAVE • 1" = log . FF1 I RF'4 �PRoPaSE P of SILL; Ual�►� d 5'x I.S x 5S = �12•S �t3 = 1�.3 CY Vo lom e 5-x `, 5-X 5- S= 12 t3— V lu%e ` /zC 2 7 n �'�S x _?e = 2308 3 = SS�_Cy s i+-e L. g = 20 .' C"% EXPIRES; 2/uo4� 1 WHOM Or FoOf *A G uT Uol�m►c° ® Y2(45- z �.S - x 3 8) = 5557. Ste:, ZOS. I C% Gene Uolu (� 7 x 1(o x 38 = tZ5�1 f1t3= I S7."7 CY z2.Scy Volume S(� Cuf'• 30 415.3 c Y ('Ri-0l&LC7 QU4 NT1 T l-pS JIM l9wlH .-v 2 UNIT CoNP6MINIW4 7th- 2,- 6E_Ll, EDMONDS" Wei l�gvsfi j (, 200� JIM IRWIN ^/ 2 - U�T coNPO &GO Be(( TABLE 1- DETENTION PIPE SIZES Edmond wA (-zl-o,- IMPERMEABLE REQUIRED PIPE DIAMETER AREA SO FT VOL CU FT 15" 18" 24" 30" 2000 50 40 28 16 10 2500 62 50 35 20 13 3000 75 60 42 24 15 REQUIRED PIPE 3500 87 70 49 28 18 LENGTH IN FEET 4000 4500 100 112 80 90 56 63 32 36 21 23 �- 5000 125 100 70 40 25 NOTE: ALLOWABLE PIPE MATERIALS ALLOWABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIALS REINFORCED CONCRETE SDR35 (ASTM D-3034) PVC ALUMINIZED STEEL N-12 ADS (DOUBLE WALLED) ALUMINUM (16GA) SCHED 40 PVC CMP (ASPHALT COATED) HANCOR (F810) PVC N-12 ADS (2' MINIMUM COVER UNDER ROADS/DRIVEWAYS) TABLE 2- OUTLET ORIFICE SIZES IMPERVIOUS OUTLET ORIFICE DIAMETER (INCHES) AREA SO FT 2000 5/8 2500 5/8 3000 3/4 3500 3/4 4000 7/8 —� 4500 7/8-4 5000 7/8 TABLE 3- RECTANGULAR CATCH BASIN REQUIREMENTS DETENTION PIPE DIAMETER MAX SIZE "CATCH BASIN KNOCKOUT TYPE < 18" 20" -+18" TO 24" 26" 24" TO 36" 36" 36" TO 42" 42" Tofa I Imp, Roof f p : 3(, oo prluewa3 , 29-o waikwags : 31l �-1815F , u5E/ T-S0d SF TYPE ICB 15 TYPE IL, CB 16 F-- TYPE II, CB 19 (48" BASIN) TYPE II, CB 19 54" BASIN) "SOURCE: ASSOC. SAND AND GRAVEL CO. STDS. I pz EDf�O.N,DS ,. STANDARD D ETAI L TABLE 0F STANDARD RESIDENTIAL DETENTION SYSTEM SIZES I' DATE lDvm 7/24/01 SCALE NTS I= t Elim-E JUN 2 8 2004 STREET FILE PERMIT COUNTER STREET FILE Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. .M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer August 19, 2004 L RECEIVED City of Edmonds SEP 17 2004 c/o James R. Irwin and Associates PERMIT COUNTER 2507 NW 202 St. Shoreline, WA 98177 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations — Temporary Shoring / Proposed Duplex Project 107 7th Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington Edmonds Plan Check No. 04 - 264 This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Irwin property at 107 7 Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Project Plans for Del Place Condominiums by James Irwin and Associates • Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E. dated August 6, 2004 • City of Edmonds plan review comments dated August 2, 2004 BACKGROUND: The overall property is rectangular in shape with approximately 60 lineal feet along Bell St., and approximately 110 feet along 7th Ave. N (see property survey). It is understood that the lot previously contained a single-family residence that has since been demolished. It is understood that property owner / developer (James R. Irwin) proposes to build a two -unit condominium project (see project plans). The property is gently sloped (less than 12 percent average grade) and contains no significant geotechnical features. The proposed condominium project will require excavation and a lower level to provide off-street parking. The lower level will require an approximate 10-foot soil cut at the rear (southerly) portion of the property adjacent the existing paved alleyway. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 2 Visual evaluation of the property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slides, no evidence of settlement, no soil tension cracks, or any evidence of erosional degradation. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 2 soil test pits were dug on August 5, 2004. The test pits were dug approximately 8 feet north of the alleyway edge of pavement (see photographs). This engineer evaluated the test pits on August 6, 2004. Both test pits revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 7' Very dense, well -graded sands and gravels NOTE: It is important to note the test holes were opened approximately 22 hours before this engineer evaluated them. Test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. No water was encountered in either of the test holes (particularly noteworthy given the heavy rains of the proceeding evening). CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Irwin property at 107 7th Ave. N is geotechnically approved for the proposed two -unit condominium project, subject to the following: • Temporary shoring: the 10-foot cut at the south foundation line will require temporary shoring to prevent erosional sloughing. Additionally, the temporary shoring will provide geotechnical protection for the existing alleyway (see later section on Temporary Shoring — Eco-Blocks). • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 3,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. • City of Edmonds 0 c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need 0 • City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 5 to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: As stated, the southern foundation line will require excavations of approximately 10 feet below grade. This 10-foot cut into the very dense sands and gravels should be protected with temporary shoring. This engineer recommends Eco-Block shoring (see design sketch). In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. • 0 City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 6 Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. . These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the test pits during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill • 9 City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 7 soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not particularly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 8 DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the site at 107 7th Ave. N. Given the extremely porous nature of the in situ soils, no drainage problems are anticipated. It is understood the new condominium project will comply with City of Edmonds standard drainage practices and tight line into the existing City of Edmonds storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. TEMPORARY SHORING — ECO-BLOCKS: The 10-foot cut near the southern portion of the property will require temporary shoring. This engineer recommends placement of Eco-Blocks in accordance with the attached design sketch and on -site inspections by this engineer. Base Eco-Block should be properly embedded as verified by on -site geotechnical inspections. Blocks should be properly linked and battered at a 1 H:6V slope. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts • Temporary Eco-Block shoring • Foundation sub -grade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation • Temporary and final erosion control SUMMARY: The proposed Irwin duplex project at 107 7th Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections durinq construction. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 9 STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the condominium project at 107 7th Ave. N by Irwin and Associates (June 28, "2004) have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. g ?00` EXPIRES r Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj cc:c James R. Irwin and Associates Y�pzt BELL PLACE 660 BELL STREET EDMONDS,, WASHINGTON 9 RECEIVED FEB 17 1999 City of Edmonds DEVELOPMENT SERVICES lk�W CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development. permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address tFT , WA City State Zip C2Q7D Tel e a igna e Date c:recepdonljanalcacl. doc Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date (over) F11 E NO. 4tritical Areas Checklis f , --------- -----------------==------------------------------------- Site Information (soil shop o graphy/hydrolo gy/ve getation) 1. Site Address/Location: 6-4-,= --=! sue• 2. Property Tax Account Number: `i'2 — 0 93— 0I'J - 3, Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? _,X yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? _�5ff46L�- r-4LA W KF£ 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation changeover entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: t4 O ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. 'Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs _ ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: gc> ---------- For City Staff Use Only--_=--= ° --- - 1 .Site is Zoned?M ... .. 2 SCS rn . ed.soil e s Z- 1 _. PP tYl?_ i) _ rW save..:- tocr w, j,. A c�+r,�it« o , � jz . ...,Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? �Ua 4 Critical Areas inventory, or.,.C.A. map.indicates Critical Area: on site? �Ei pso: , ,. S:L s W/ erosmn P �1 S.... Site -within designated.earth subs idence.landsl►de.hazard area? (� . 6.... Site designated on the. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Map? j 6 :........:.................. DETER1 INATION ^ca chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 In soz February 22, 1999 James R. Irwin 8000 212" St. S.W. Edmonds, WA 98026 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 99-31 Dear Applicant: BARBARAFAHEY MAYOR Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Enc: Critical Areas Determination * Architectural Design Board Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Thank you. Sharla Graham Planning Secretary C: Reception\Jana\C R LTR.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan DATE RECEIVED / x PERMIT EXPIRES CITY EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE 4,0089'.1, .OF NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOD��L �,r, SUITE/APT# ADDRESS OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. lPLAT k:�✓ K ! J mac/ LID FEE $ ¢ W MAILING ADDRESS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP Approved RW Permit Required 0 C / /r'TESCP % Civ `'� - i� !i i' Vy Street Use Permit Req'd 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required 0 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Sidewalk Required 0 Underground Wiring required NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ O w ADDRESS REMARKS Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE ' ' 2 z W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE 1 NAME • IiJ ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE ' .�( UADDRESS 00 1, FIRE REVIEWED BY DATELU z CITY ZIP' TELEPHONE ¢ N Z LL. VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY REO'D POSTED D�cc `` /� // ,A L {' ,,pper� JI `IC�� b1 rg �b e> ❑YES ❑NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. c7 J � Zof)� (�� 2 I I EXP NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR t7 AUDITION COMMERCIAL o COMPLIANCE OR f: z CHANGE OF USE REMODEL O APARTMENT ❑ SIGN Z 5 REO'D PARKING P PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REPAIR 1K G/ �C' CYDS FENCE ( X FT) REMARKS DEMOLISH TANK OTHER Z o GARAGE CARPORT -RETAININGROCKERY WALL' RENEWAL I- (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKEDBY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CODE OCCUPANT U5er - GROUP CNUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT m OF DWELLING AREAS O STORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS C7 2 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D c -rO m cc W iLi_.. � N• � 1-� IeJ4d O /�. `I0tjL EEX (•• /�' I ^I - VALUATION FEE "rA pna PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING PLAN CHECK MO' VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL 2 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE r SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE ¢ w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS n PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF L ¢EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' RE EI T C TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WOR ' COMPENSA N INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIAL S GNATU DATE IGNATUR WN NT) DATE SIGNED (425) A 1rr) 27 "&CD 771 -0220 RELEASED BY ATE AftEI#ION EXT/333 IT I LAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771 -0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL- FILE • YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER • GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 r DATE RECEIVED t / 9 PERMIT EXPIRES a9 CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE % //��,-��^^��sr "�/ F NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION CON SUITE/APTa AD ADDRESS �O OWNER NAME.-NA}AE OF BUSINES V 1 / PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ w MAILING ADDP=SS // ` % I `!�^{�' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP 0 o r t v �I l•�� ✓ l EXISTING PROPOSED RW PermitApproved quiired Street Use Permit Rq'd 0 Inspection Required 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE }�jr�%�% / ^ t�)Si REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Sidewalk Required 0 underground Underground / j required 0 NAM METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ ADDRESS REMARKS Z Z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z LU CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME S ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE �JV ADDRESS tx O "�G I , FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE UJI CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Z c°� �� U. STATE LICENSE NUl.IBER EXPIRAT N DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBN INSPECTION BOND REO'D POSTED ❑YES ❑NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED a PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. r 7 ( EXP RESIDENTIAL ❑ NEW ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT tJR SIDE REAR ..O ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ OR Z CHANGEANCE OF USE REQ'p ARKIPROVIDED LOT AREA [PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT [:1SIGN a REPAIR GRADING FENCE CYDS ❑ ( X FT) REMARKS •..�❑ t+,_I DEMOLISH TANK ❑ OTHER o GARAGE CARPORT ❑ RETAININ1G WALL ❑ RENEWAL 4� Z O ROCK (TYPE OF USE. BUSINEiOR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: r- CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CO OCCUPANT cc /�J I�-.J.' / h �ry Cl ///""---L� J GROUP NUMBER NUMBER OF _ CRITICA C w SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT m OF "" `� DWELLING AREAS O STORIES UNITS NUMBER - REQUIRED ❑YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS C7 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REQ'D J �,�-.� -Y_J - Ps";01 L . AXA4erc iv-f l� s m f �s�f�In/Gc. VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE w .- • - -^ ^ -^...•....moo. + .. -r BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL V J SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION rn y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE � IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE RECEIPT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' RECOO TOTAL AMOUNT DUE / % ..� 6�<111 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signet oy cne TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provioeo. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. i/SIGNATUf E (OWNE AGEN DATE SIGN / A^5` OFFICIALS SIGNA URE DATE a �" � � -�--' 771-0220 w"RELEASED BY DATE A TEJVTION EXA333 IT IS711NLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL � �y 7%1-�22� A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE Y_LL OV.. I:;S.-':� TQR FAX PINK - OWNER • GOLD ASSESSOR 5/98 l0-4 — 4,Ax Awe,. JN CITY OF EDMONDS 700 MAIN ST • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0230 • FAX (425) 771-0253 tJ �Mww�s✓ PARKS, RECREATION AND jh C. 1 g9� CULTURAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2-28=08 Jen, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Here is the updated tree planting detail for Bell Place Condominium project located at 107-7t' Avenue North. As I stated in last email I met Jim Erwin last Friday, February 22nd and marked location where three "Chanticleer Pear" trees will be planted on 71' Avenue and location where three "Katsura" trees will be planted on Bell Street. Tree locations are indicated on drawing. Any questions please contact me. Thanks, /U Rich Lindsay Parks Manager • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Cic+or r;+,, - 1--inLinnn .T-- i • log 1th kJe�1, When recorded mail to: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 200708221065 CONFORMED COPY PGS SNOHOMISH7COONT�m 145.00IGTON lllffr�llf SPACE ABOVE THE LINE FOR RECORDERS USE Assessor's Parcel No.•• 4 3 4 2- 0 9 8- 01 9= 0 0 0 2 Applicant: JAMESR. IRWIN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and JAMES R. IRWIN-, Q2a&dne ("Ownerf sJ"), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. 1. The Property. Owner is the owner of that certain real property located at 107 7th AVENUE NORTH within the City of Edmonds. - Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number 4342-098-019-0002 and more particularly described as follows LOTS 19 & 20, BLOCK 98, CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, VOLUME 2, PAGE 39 OF PLATS, STATE OF WASHINGTON S Q44- 1 � 7'1 9_ or as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The Easement. The City right-of-way adjacent to owner's property or an existing easement used for (strike those that don't apply) [street, read;effky,-tfail, sidewalk, bikepaffi, pedestriwt-easemet9t, vffl4or, sue, l t1w 3. The Encroachment. The Owner desires to encroach upon the public easement and the City hereby covenants and agrees and grants its permission to Owner to allow AN EXISTING CON _R .TE1MASONRY ._ RETAINING WALL AND IRRIGATION LINES AS SHOWN ON ATTACHED DRAWINGS to remain in a portion of the City right-of-way/easement. A partial site plan, scaled 1"=20', showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit `B" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is subject to the following terms and conditions: -lof4- a. On behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, the Owner promises to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace the encroachment located in the easement at their sole expense to the standards established by the City. All maintenance, repair, removal and/or replacement shall be conducted solely at the Owners' expense. b. The Owner, on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns, acknowledge that the City had no obligation to approve the encroachment within the easement for the sole benefit of the Owner, and the agreements contained herein, provide sufficient consideration for the Owner and their successors and assigns to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace said encroachment located in the easement at their sole expense in perpetuity. c. The Owner promises to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim or liability of any kind or nature arising from or out of its promises contained within this agreement, including any damage that may be caused to the encroachment by the City's operation, maintenance, repair, replacement or other work related to construction activity within the easement This promise to hold harmless and indemnify includes defense by counsel of the City's choosing, the payment of reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. Nothing herein, however, shall be interpreted to require the Owner to indemnify the City from the negligence or intentional tortuous act of its employees, officers, or agents. d. The Owner shall at the request of the City, promptly remove, repair, reconstruct, and/or replace the encroachment at the Owners' sole expense. Upon receipt of notification from the City that the City requires removal of all or portions of the encroachment from within the easement, the Owner will promptly remove those portions of the encroachment from within the easement area as required by the City at their sole expense. If the portions of the encroachment required by the City to be removed are not timely removed by the Owner, they shall be removed by the City at the expense of the Owner, and the Owner shall reimburse the City for the costs of removal of the encroachment and disposal of materials as well as for any increased construction costs or consequential damages incurred by the City due to the Owners' delay. In the event that portions of the encroachment must be removed to facilitate utility and/or construction activity by the City within the easement or other requirements of the City, the Owner shall be solely responsible for replacement of the encroachment at their expense upon completion of the utility and/or construction or other activity by the City. e. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected by City's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachment structure. -2of4- f. The property owner is required to provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance. A copy of the insurance certificate shall be provided to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21 S` day of January. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. This agreement may not be amended except in writing in a document filed of record with the auditor of Snohomish County, Washington. 5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial means and addressed as follows: I to the Cites If to the Owner: City Engineer JAMES R. IRWIN City of Edmonds 2507 N.W. 202'iid : J: STREET 121 Fifth Avenue North SHORELINE, WA 98177 Edmonds, WA 98020 which addresses may be changed from time to time by providing notice to the other party in the manner described above. 6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. Any waiver by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement. 7. Termination of Agreement. In addition to any other remedy provided for by law, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement in the event the encroachment negatively impacts or damages the. City's easement and/or underlying utility systems or violates any condition of service adopted by the City, at. its sole discretion, as may be necessary to prevent damage to the City's utility system, or any other public facility which may be impacted by the Owners' failure to properly use the easement. 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision. -3of4- • • 9. Capacity. Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s) thereby bind such party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this H day of TUn-e , 200-7 O R By: By: S F WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH This day, personally appeared before me, uckm-e3 1 r W k y-) , to me known to be the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing document and that (he/she/they) h le- signed the same -as (his/her/their) h 1 3 free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. i �� , •'esok • _ : Notary Public a ' , 0 0TMY ! iu p60G i = ` Typed or Printed Name O =`nJ► �.•� O'� %� My Commission expires: 7-19-07 CITY OF E By: ERING DIVISION -4of4- I-T t $ i lid 15 A.LLEV of 1LN��W-P-Uma" 110, 0 6x ISTIR(s I I .04PLEX l iL ►_ f k y °` �s Pntca 43$`1 -G'J43-z 0002 - .,SS',07'7lT4 �P- f L Pve�Ml- -all iE ;/Frrr:+ri/'i,/i/i...rrx� riyrioiiryri/siYilrr�i;�r..;s / ifrt/rimer ;•. !`,rir.,,.w��.'�rir►.eaw`rr..�+n..��r.wrr�.r�wrrrww:�r...rr�.�r, • • PROPERTY LINE INR—>^ if i-------'-- CONCRETE/MASONRY WALL PLANTING STRIP SIDEWALK \VA-LL �TICQI L� • Of ED_4f P4 10N CITY OF E S 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - 80 0 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 Inc. t 89� STATUS: APPROVED Permit Number: ENG20070285 Address of Public Use/Encroachment: 107 7TH AVE N, EDMONDS IRW IN JAMES R 2507 NW 202ND ST SHORELINE, WA 98177 F)dsting concrete masonry retaining wall and new irrigation system along Bell Street & 7th Ave N. ENG20070285 STREET USE: Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion of public space or City right-of-way shall meet all code requirements as set forth in the following chapters of the Edmonds Community Development Code. ENCROACHMENT. Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapter of the Edmonds Community Development Code. CODE APPLICATION. Chapter 18. 70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. All terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth in full and this permit therefore is subject to the terms of those chapters. FOR THE TERM IN WHICH THIS PUBLIC USE/ENCROACHMENT IS IN EFFECT, THE OWNER SHALL COMPL Y WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONS SET FORTH BYTHIS PERMIT. NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per ECDC 18.70.040. Applicant is responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21st day of January. INDEMNITY: The Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the applicant understands that he/she shall provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a ceritfficate of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance. THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMITUNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. Printed: Friday, December 28, 20C FILE COPY \ V ❑ INSPECTOR COPY 0 APPLICANT COPY 0 • STATUS: APPROVED ENG20070285 CONDITIONS I • The proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel. • Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively approved. • The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public. • The proposal either benefits the public interest, safety or convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city street) or is an accessory stricture such as fence normally associated with residential use of the property as fully complies with the requirements of criteria 3 above. None -City of Edmonds Permit No a000-032 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Co• struction:1 660 BELL ST « PERMISSION IS REQUESTED TO INSTALL A 2'PLASTIC MAIN TIE IN FROM t6'N B. Type of Work (be specific): c/1 OF PAVING AND t407'E C/L OF 6 AV S, CONTINUE EAST TO THE END OF MAIN t588'E C/L , TO SERVE TARGET 007009730 C. Contractor: PUGET R01M) RNRRt:V Mailing Address: 1122 75th ST SW State License D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Contact: DOUG USITALO Phone: 425-356-7520 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ CityProject ❑ EUC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) ❑ Multi -Family] Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: YES ❑'NO,�w~ G. SI OF CU 2 . X . 214:"2,H:,.Charge: $ CONCRETE CUT: YES NO , I • i IDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his%her signature to this application he/she holds the City. of Edmonds harmless from injuries,+ damages or claims of any kind'or•description whatsoever, foreseen. or' unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or' any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296=155-305 and must. have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦' Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS L; W4�200C Signature: "�• �-_:k��-W Date: 9 / (Contractor or Agent) - CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK ( FORCITY USE ONLY Approved by• ' !� Right-of-way Fee:_-, Time Authot` : ` hid After. ,"1. Disruption Fee/Fund 111: . Restoration Fee: Total Fee' tA Receipt No: Issued by— UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED-.- PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THJ EDMONDS. _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE..__,' FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: - INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE: (JZ- For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. M City of Edmonds Permit NO: RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: o B. Type of Work (be specific): C: Contractor: Mailing Address: '» S(,j i State License #: C-P (01 D. Building Permit # (if applicable Contact: Phone: Liability Insurance: . Bond: $ Side Sewer. Permit # (if applicable):- E. Commercial . ❑ Subdivision Q City Project EUC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) Multi -Family ❑ Single Family 0 Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT: ❑'YES. ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X H. Charge: $ CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO APPLICANT1 AND SIGN IDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from. injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public. safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained . as required by (WAC) M-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession:`_ ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday.— NO EXCEPTIONS. Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTIS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUYT WKF THE PINK COP OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS or Agent) CALL DIAL-A-DIG.(1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. FORCI,TY USE ONLY 00 00. Approved by >Right-of.=way Fee: 1A t After* r1�Time Authorizeda•VoiDisruption Fee/Fund:lll: Special,Conditions: ,5&WC-U:"y Restoration Fee: S 6tas 0.G_ RSVH. Prt�t° 'f' % i ttCC. Total Fee:ue Vg,2. 6 k"C�I'S1A'RDS° Nt7"Ti Receipt.No: S Issued,by: UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. 'Y FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. INSPEC#bhSSIGNATURE DATE: 1101 For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. APPLICATION The Cityof Edmonds for SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ EASEMENT No ........................................... 114-03250 OWNER ----------Francis N. Glaser•-•••••--••-••------------------------------- CONTRACTOR...-.........--------...-.---••-----.-...-..---......-...-----••--------•----•...-.............--- PERMIT No....................... ADDRESS.......6 6 0... Bell St. ' .-.-..... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No. BLOCK No... • NAMEOF ADDITION-•-------•-•....................•---•-•-•-••-----....---....-..--..........-..•...-•--•----.-........-.....-..----....---...-........--.. Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE................................................ By......-•-••-••-•-•--....-..-.......--..-....-.....-..-.....--.... 7DCl�:ri'a'Syyrr;� c•kr..it:7n,i:+w;�•ti7Y%.�g' Tti}F` ��,^-,.e`F.,1F,7�'...'`•;: 'yv�j�.'....Ty,.rti v'1G.":.evl'.N•nit`vL;{,.-.:-:A':.+�?Y�"f,.;,rv,}•9,. •j:, J�yc; i 'rr'�: '1'.�a,t•,'ol� .. gn.,rmtrxls "1 Roy gave verbal on 10/1/96 City in Edmonc# . RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: 9� 3 • �� "`� OCT 2 2 19% Issue Date: A9 EYM INVC12cinity of Construction: 660 Bel 1 GTE top ace, operate, and maintain a buried service B. Tyyppee of Work (be specific): wire from existing Pole #7532 located at 7i•h n,. N & 18 9 p -,,1 9 °� alley between Main & Bell then north to residence at 660 Bell. GTE to plow 47 feet, push one driveway, and gold push.R.O.W. r=—y�t Mary A. Bower, Permit Coordinator C. Contractbr: GTE Northwest Incorporated Contact: nPnnis AlPxandf-r 771-9019 mnhilP 388-1358 s 2312-C W. Casino Rd Mailing Address: Everett, Wa 9On1�40- Phone State. License #: _ _ Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit tl (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Projectx;K Utility (PUD, GTE WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other' 2100-9P001D6 242310 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: Ro jL,)L.-%; `Ic- F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : 0 Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: 2 ft x 3 ft H. Charge $ Concrete cut: Please see attached sketch.r' around pole. ---.. - _ _ j ..� APPLICANT TO READ AND'SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or, any of its departments or eymployees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CtT Y FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed. work required with,permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please calf the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes' Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in acco ante with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above stateme understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at im urposes. Signature: �' -lohn H- Stew-rt Date: September 30, 1996 (Contractor or Agent) Sec. Mgr.-Adcess Design CALL DIAL -A -DIG. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: ' RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER c Z.. DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 111: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: - N R • RESTORATION .FEE: PERMIT FEE: TOTAL YEE: 0 � COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE: DATE: ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram.: (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: " Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: m LEGE,, L: 0 z PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE POLES 0 ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES I.D. UTILITY POTHOLE G3 UG TRENCHING —UGT `l e� `p • ��'7 �D��` MIET CgbTWAV, 05w n som we ------------------------- --— ._---- -11 lu A VE Pi ---------------------------- - _ -- - ----..---------------------------- �b CUTS, m LEGh,. il o - z PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE ROLES o ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES I.D. UTILITY POTHOLE C7 UG TRENCHING —UCT oa r �Il� 1 P�t�ccf Ftow1~ ik PUN G `p � aN sA'som we us li — FUU�t —i---J; 'y -- - — — — — — — — — — � � ; — — — _ SfDEtc?ii��K� — — — — —� - ------------------ - - - -- -- -'EOP l p A VE Ai ----------------------------- - ---- - - ---_--------------------------- �o CUTS, 777�7= 6 r City of Edmond RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION -- PERMIT Permit Number: IS A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: .660 Bel 1 GTE top ace, operate, and maintain a ourieT service B. Type of Work (be specific): wi re f rom exi sti nq pol a #7532 1 ocated at 7th Av. N &,,, 18 9 0 1 9 o alley between Main & &1 1 then north to residence at 660 Bell. GTE to plow 47 feet, push one driveway, and no road push. R.O.W. 66 feet. Mary A Bower, Permit Coord. C. Contractor: GTE Northwest incorporated Contact: Dennis Alexander 771-9036 or mobile 388-1358 Casino Rd Mailing Address: Everett. WA 98204-1400 Phone: Mary 706/488-162R State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family r INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : Concrete cut around pole. Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): ❑ City Project cX Utility (PUDI GTE WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Other 2100-9P001DB 242310 INSPECTOR: R w Yes []No G. Size of Please see attached sketch. APPLICANT TO REA] f t x 3 f t H. Charge $ SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense coats, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH 7S COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be iri accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements understand the permit requirementsland thepink.copy of the permit will be available on site at a ' es� ' ion urposes. Signature: �y{ John H. Stewart Date: September 30, 1996 (Contractor or Agent) Oprns Supv-OSP Engrg. CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK Q FOR CITY USE OmLY APPROVED BY: RIGHT.OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER (� DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND: 111: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A W GV T LONG . RESTORATION FEE:: QIG /ZCsM a �4 T l:'Xf �,NS� oN PERMIT FEE:.C7 .,.del P T . TOTAL.FEE: COMMENTS: -- RECEIPT FEE: DATE: ISSUED.BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN .PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram; CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION Partial Work .Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved .By: FINAL APPROVAL BY: (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) ❑ YES Date: Date: ❑ NO N m LEGEND N N N 0 z PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE i ti- srRF%.� --------------- -------=� POLES C ROAD BORES OVERHEAT} LINES I.D. UTILITY POTHOLE UG TRENCHING -UG T PLKE FLOWS IN ,Q.W. SIDEWALK - --_----------4S=- -------------- -'EOP p A UE JAI ---------------------------- - ---- - - ---r------------- _' -r------------ Qb l0 Q1 ((V CUTS, N m 0 LEGEND 0 m N m " PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE ROLES o ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES I.D. UTILITY POTHOLE O UG TRENCHING ---UC T PLKE G �p 411E T H3 S UJ ""0 •, � � (A Sol we SrDFW�tK. ,,� ,� 5 • SiDE[Jn�fC_ _.__� ----------------------�=-- ~-_----=------= -- =-----_--_-_--_-'EDP — — .- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — - - — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �b v CUTS, N m LEGEND ' N N N 0 z 0 PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE PEDS POLES o ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES I.D. UTILITY POTHOLE 1= UG TRENCHING —UGT PLFfLf ELOWE it T'0� Q Off' InET 'DSW V !W n ►L _ 0.w. SwFWwt K �.� S • SfDE[clfitK! _� ! ------------------- - - - - -_--=--------=--------------- ----------/EOP -It u 14 VE JU ---------------------------- -- - - ----_--------------A�5------------- CUTS, 01i23/97,., 09:13 F A X TO: NO. 449 1?01 v e- C' I IkI r- �- JAN 2 3 1997 ENGINEERINC. DATE: 2 7 HALLS LAKE CONSTRUCTION FAX NUMBER 206 612-7255 FROM: PHONE NUMBER'-7 7, susiECT: C..v rr - --m - PAGES COVER SHEET PLUS----L-------------- 01i23i97 09:13 'I: IV' a roll NO.449 902 Kay gave Varbal on 10/1196 city of EdM013 'WAY ,CONSMUcTION RiG 'Y'�4F-PRFINTr P ittKtt ''i 46 �,� `► " 6w Ballivs qd aC8.Or Vicinity or C pate, opera e,, a ata 1' e e bvr! ed Av- tl Aacated.r„� of work ft � wife er e t CTE to p! a+v &' a o- f hia n t. Be)1 t en nertn to resldenCe at 860 Bel l6-000- - u - y7 feet, Push one driv - 358 Macy A. ROOM'* Permit Coordinator c4mum: Coatt9ctor �13-C W. Cssloo Rd- MailiAg Addle"'- i inbility lnlat mw-.-.,--•- �: S Stan Liema Ih Side iewcr Permit # (it awieeble): (] 3nbdivieioi+ d city Project Utility (P �,,,;� ► WAXER) E. Q Sipgta Family a21t1a-gppOtDe gy2310 Q Multi -Family D INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 ft tt C'r82� Yea �No G. Siztrof �L: �.. �t t er CAttcttte dot : M ppttvet� Ples�e sae atrach4d sttetah. Al SIGN t:onarete aut: APFLACAN'l"t`Q ItF.AD a round polo . hwwmtess roan+ irW�°•• Q°m°t"' or t>grsn to he" &Ae d'!v a/ Fd atone or WW of ts# AWps,tatenta or dwd by ^at"' a to Off° be ,uaQe aR ' tMr CiLY of , b rim of two . MU INDkMNtTY: +4NPuseover.lorr—nur'W°e1"' gdol&eaosta oa+inu�h+ L"bA oatanYWAdar Iry to dRodefa+tsedl0'�' 0 OF tUNls yomit F f I.GW"O'WE svM" ves. twa�t++dln�f o' ++et tltgtt4td 90ft A PERIOD UN7(L ,W&- Vj,4AI- CTREET PA" Nam A)p WaRKMA1v$Hlrr R ar�+�TION !< ►t'�Lt Be jaw MA, WNT)LU TOR h t:tMPo �, FYTjMA M �rxs t� ISSUlANcrr 1D 'I'II� nPP0 ANT' (plv AND AC'_k1'TAWCI; PF TBR l� W'bL R P'0C� R ,,,,,1'GT ATWIIICI !'ACEAGst7J .e c; pr. l'ID er rt y �r,Rc�a. uired with permit drawing of 2 tined work r Please call tYle ngineerin>t Dlvtst°n+ ?71.4220. JAN constructionwad for inspection-, d °uric " °nd at completion, lety � `� A 24 hour notice ie raq Work and mattmal is to be r with City Cod F Iq/tV(;, jtestoradon is to be ins regulations OR the City EnE umff. Street shall be kept rlaan At all titlnea. l be in ac ce with City regu ► the end of the working aw. Tygfie Control and Public Safetyty IN vvtth ssphalt' or city approved materw p� to All street mt ditzhea shall be pa NO EXCEPTIONS • pond th0 PQ•mit r9Q uirevwnU a►td the pink copy of thg permil wiU be nes urpOse Ihate read th site atnU t S++pt81 r 30. 1g'Jb auoslabie on vice at nit a es for t Mote: ewelt Amors Danish $ionature: {CWyiraCMr or ,merit) �0' ems' CAS j�jA;,.A_DYG PRIO!Us% ONLY R TO BEGINNING WORK t.+: j r Iil[it37 OF wo DE OW APPROVED by: ass�gu ! . -rEM i at]TgO�tiZt"D: VO[D AFP _ : - .. .. .��,gtriitl F$1fa spr,CIAL CONInT O 91 . 4LYt '< n cow _ • ... -- _-.;t�j,n�. tern, • .>t .IS;,• ty. ISSUANCE E 6n`, ::......:,.- N p1�gU�t 'I'� pE�lVII'i' 9S�]A IrI-+ i�++�' I Div. t9 ]4 NO WORK SHA 17C ttrt %mlvzl0S . - —,.- -e%ki CONSTRU TION PARKING TO OCCUR IN PUBLIC STREET SPACES ON 7th AVEENUE DRIVEWAY WILL REMAIN 6LEAR FOR FIRETRU# ACCESS t 15' ALLEY PROP. LINE 60' �� rr NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WILL BE STORED 0 SITE EXCEPT o HARDWARE IT EMS •' w DUPLEX z H RESI ENCE a s, 0 THERE WILL BE NO a, D.W. IMPAIRMENT OF ACCESS TO AND W FROM PARKING OR 3 RESIDENTIAL �. AREAS PRQP,_ LINE Q� ____ BELL STREET CENTER -LINE 60'�ROW JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT 206-683-4592 NORTH RECEIVED J U N - 4 2007 BUILDING DEPT. BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 CONSTRU TION PARKING TO OCCUR IN PUBLIC STREET SPACES ON 7th AVEENUE DRIVEWAY WILL REMAIN BLEAR FOR i FIRETRU( K ACCESS t 15' ALLEY SO. PROP. LINE 60' N6 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WILL BE STORED ON SITE EXCEPT/ o HARDWARE I/TEMS r' W DUPLEX H RESIDENCE a j O THERE WILL BE NO a, D.W. IMPAIRMENT OF E-4 ACCESS TO AND FROM PARKING OR RESIDENTIAL AREAS a NO . HOP. _.m...SlD WPaLKmwNTI BELL STREET CENTER -LINE 60" ROW NORTH R5DEIV ED JUN - 4 Z007 BUILDING DEPT. DAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM ARCHITECT 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH 206-653-4 92 EDMONDS, WA 980-10 CONSTRU TION PARKING TO OCCUR IN PUBLIC STREET SPACES ON 7th AVEENUE DRIVEWAY WILL REMAIN &EAR FOR.I FIRETRUOK ACCESS, 15' ALLEY PROP. LINE 60' { ,1 . NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS WILL BE STORED ON SITE EXCEPT o HARDWARE I/TEMS r' I W DUPLEX z H RESI7NCE a O THERE WILL BE NO a; D.W. IMPAIRMENT OF F, ACCESS TO AND W FROM PARKING OR RESIDENTIAL �. BELL STREET CENTER -LINE 6V ROW NORTH RECEIVED J U N - 4 2007 BUILDING DEPT. JAMES R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM ARCHITECT 107 7TH AVENUE NORTH 206-683-4592 EDMONDS, WA 98020 v G` JAMES:.R. IRWIN & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT 2507"NW. 202ND STREET SHORELINE WA-98 77 206-683-4592 (CEL)- 206-542-9191 (HOME OFFICE) MARCH 10, 2007 MR. DAVID GEBERT, P.E. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 RE: DRIVEWAY APPROACH MODIFICATION BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM 1'07 '7TH AVE.' N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 1, BUILDING PERMIT NO. 2004-00939 DEAR MR. GEBERT: RECEIVED MAR 12 2007 ENGINEERING DIVISION I AM WRITING TO REQUEST A SLIGHT MODIFICATION TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS DRIVEWAY TRANSITIONAL STANDARD AS IT WILL APPLY TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT. WHEREAS THE CITY STANDARD REQUIRES THAT BOTH THE CITY AND PRIVATE SIDES OF THE DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITION ARE TO SLOPE AT 1:12, WE WOULD LIKE TO SLOPE ONLY THE CITY SIDE OF THE TRANSITION. TO SLOPE BOTH, WOULD CREATE A NON- CONFORMING DRIVEWAY SLOPE ON THE LOWER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY WHICH IS DICTATED BY THE SLOPE OF 7TH AVE. IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED IN AN ON - SITE REVIEW BY JEANIE MC CONNELL, THAT IF ALLOWED THIS MODIFICATION, WE WILL STILL MAINTAIN THE 1:12 HANDICAP MAXIMUM SLOPE REQUIREMENT THE CITY STANDARD ACHIEVES. THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST. JAMES R. IRWIN PROJECT ARCHITECT C: MS. JEANIE MC CONNELL .................. est Solution - Planter strip allows flat, uninterrupted sidewalk planting strip sidewalk MOEslope 'Pal Street Elevation change is made within the planter strip, allowing level (2%) sidewalk at driveway driawol aeA eydo APPRUYED AS NOTED a BY ENGINEERING curb / w�f,er anal Mh�- per sediou Date: —A&F-b-00 'I or gdMonds jkvI -ItL five AJ • rw"" insfecki97J ?ptatroil prior fa ,00�u': 1rW1#1 2-jinn Condo M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer December 30, 2004 City of Edmonds — Development Service Department 121 5t' Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Field Reports / Geotechnical Inspections Irwin Duplex Project 107 7th Ave. N. Plan Check # 04-264 This engineering report presents the results of geotechnical inspections (to date) for the Irwin Duplex project at 107 7th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA. These inspections were required by the City of Edmonds in conjunction with the geotechnical report. REFERENCES: • City of Edmonds Approved Plans by Irwin Architects • Geotechnical Report and Shoring Designs by D. Bruce, P. E. • Special Geotechnical Inspection Authorization by City of Edmonds • Site Photographs INSPECTIONS: This engineer has provided daily onsite inspections during active excavation and shoring installation phase of the project. Project contractor began excavation during the week of December 20, 2004. As anticipated by the geotechnical report, dense native sands with occasional gravels were encountered. Excavation into this soil was stable. No adverse sloughing or caving occurred. Contractor properly began to install the eco-block shoring, in accordance with the approved designs. Base eco-blocks were well founded in the dense native sub -grade soils. Block linkage, batter, and drainage zone were properly established. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 City of Edmonds — Development Service Department December 30, 2004 Page 2 of 2 This engineer verified that all temporary shoring (eco-block walls) were properly constructed and are geotechnically stable. No adverse erosion control problems were observed during inspections. The native sands allow for excellent drainage and infiltration of storm water. The rear alleyway has been'well maintained and is geotechnically stable. SUMMARY: • Excavation and temporary shoring work have been properly completed and are approved through this date (December 30, 2004). • All Eco-Block shoring is stable and geotechnically approved. • Geotechnical inspections are ongoing in accordance with City of Edmonds permit requirements. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. �",'of wASj pp�' e 30( 17405 ADO 4tCIsm- M • ' ONAL B�G� Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Wpm, 12r" a"'- Geotechnical / Civil Engineer C.C. Irwin and Associates 2507 NW 202"d St. Shoreline, WA 98177 DMB:jpb CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. :• TESTING & INSPECTION 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE PREVIOUS REPORT No. i 1 Q No. �.. 4 .,tr KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 EVERETT (425) 823-9800 (425) 259-0817 DAT ; j CERT. Ng..R .._ FIELD REPORT PRO //,> ( ( f(ace- cc d� LOCATION A TO: //07 Z BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER W T ER TEMP. AT AM AT PM ENGI R ARCEMECT ATTN: �� f V✓ < (' CON CTOR (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED - FOUNDATIONS RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESSTEEUMASONRY _ STR.ST[WELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS THER - STR.STIBOLTING - DRILLED PIERS - WAL L'S 5 �Q ` E-k (AA `� BEAMS (LOCATION AREAS) �� 1 �. i IV (5) RECEIVED CONCRETEIMASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (f'c) O C T 1 O SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. YES _ NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED 7/05 1 SIGNED BY CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION ' 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE PREVIOUS 124948 REPORT KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 EVERETT (425) 823-9800 (425) 259-0817 No. No. DAT '^/ �{J� 7��f/^ CERT. N 6C. r��Y W FIELD REPORT PRO& © y LOCATION O 7 Ave TO: BLDG. PERMIMIT NO. 'OWNER l� TEMP. AT AM 777olv AT PM ENGI R ATTN: ARCWJ.ECT G`ivc�s�� { CONT C`TORR (2) INSPECTION PERFORMED (3) ITEMS INSPECTED _ FOUNDATIONS RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLA B _ REESSTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STIWELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS — �'fHHER �! GAF- — STR.STIBOLTING — DRILLED PIERS — W S BEAMS LOCATION AREAS) l/1/ J`.� TI MOE CONCRETENASONRY MIX NO. DESIGN STRENGTH (fc) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. _ YES _ NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS REMARKS: ke 9?-7 a�J +1 ' `vLi CklAleSS SC � �U - S U Nc(7 Pik Co We So �.5 5c� c-�ezti 4--(c (:s TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S), NAME(S) PRINTED Is BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL, WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE uV/�ii_J REVISED 7/05 SIGNED BY COPIES TO: BELL PLACE 660 BELL STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9 • Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. r August 19, 2004 Geotechnical/Civil Engineer CITY COPY RECEIVED City of Edmonds SEP 17 2004 c/o James R. Irwin and Associates PERMIT COUNTER 2507 NW 202 St. Shoreline, WA 98177 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations — Temporary Shoring / Proposed Duplex Project 107 7tt' Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington Edmonds Plan Check No. 04 - 264 This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Irwin property at 107 7th Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Project Plans for Del Place Condominiums by James Irwin and Associates • Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E. dated August 6, 2004 • City of Edmonds plan review comments dated August 2, 2004 BACKGROUND: The overall property is rectangular in shape with approximately 60 lineal feet along Bell St., and approximately 110 feet along 7th Ave. N (see property survey). It is understood that the lot previously contained a single-family residence that has since been demolished. It is understood that property owner / developer (James R. Irwin) proposes to build a two -unit condominium project (see project plans). The property is gently sloped (less than 12 percent average grade) and contains no significant geotechnical features. The proposed condominium project will require excavation and a lower level to provide off-street parking. The lower level will require an approximate 10-foot soil cut at the rear (southerly) portion of the property adjacent the existing paved alleyway. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 2 Visual evaluation of the property reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slides, no evidence of settlement, no soil tension cracks, or any evidence of erosional degradation. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 2 soil test pits were dug on August 5, 2004. The test pits were dug approximately 8 feet north of the alleyway edge of pavement (see photographs). This engineer evaluated the test pits on August 6, 2004. Both test pits revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 7' Very dense, well -graded sands and gravels NOTE: It is important to note the test holes were opened approximately 22 hours before this engineer evaluated them. Test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. No water was encountered in either of the test holes (particularly noteworthy given the heavy rains of the proceeding evening). CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Irwin property at 107 7th Ave. N is geotechnically approved for the proposed two -unit condominium project, subject to the following: • Temporary shoring: the 10-foot cut at the south foundation line will require temporary shoring to prevent erosional sloughing. Additionally, the temporary shoring will provide geotechnical protection for the existing alleyway (see later section on Temporary Shoring — Eco-Blocks). • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 3,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 5 to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: As stated, the southern foundation line will require excavations of approximately 10 feet below grade. This 10-foot cut into the very dense sands and gravels should be protected with temporary shoring. This engineer recommends Eco-Block shoring (see design sketch). In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 6 Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. , These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the test pits during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 7 soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not particularly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material _may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 8 DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the site at 107 71h Ave. N. Given the extremely porous nature of the in situ soils, no drainage problems are anticipated. It is understood the new condominium project will comply with City of Edmonds standard drainage practices and tight line into the existing City of Edmonds storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. TEMPORARY SHORING — ECO-BLOCKS: The 10-foot cut near the southern portion of the property will require temporary shoring. This engineer recommends placement of Eco-Blocks in accordance with the attached design sketch and on -site inspections by this engineer. Base Eco-Block should be properly embedded as verified by on -site geotechnical inspections. Blocks should be properly linked and battered at a 1 H:6V slope. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts • Temporary Eco-Block shoring • Foundation sub -grade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation • Temporary and final erosion control SUMMARY: The proposed Irwin duplex project at 107 7th Ave. N, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. City of Edmonds c/o James R. Irwin and Associates August 19, 2004 Page 9 STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the condominium project at 107 7th Ave. N by Irwin and Associates (June 28, 2004) have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. r Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj cc:c James R. Irwin and Associates SHANNON6WILSON, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS November 2, 2004 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds; WA 98020 Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell Nov 4 - 2004 ENGINEERING DIVISION RE: GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR IRWIN PROJECT AT 107 SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON At your request, we have completed a review of the temporary shoring system proposed for construction of a two -unit condominium located at 107 Seventh Avenue North in Edmonds. Documents we have reviewed include: ► Geotechnical Evaluation —Foundation Recommendations —Temporary Shoring/Proposed Duplex Project, 107 7"' Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington, dated August 19, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. ► Existing and Proposed Grading Plan for Bell Place Condominium, Sheet C-3, dated 9/26/04 by James R. Irwin and Associates. ► Revised Shoring Plan (Temporary "Eco-Block" Shoring) dated September 29, 2004, by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. ► Two sections (A -A' and B-B') through the proposed condominium, showing proposed basement elevation. A series of ecology blocks has been proposed as temporary shoring for the excavation at the south end of the proposed development —next to an alley. Three rows of blocks at a 6:1 batter with a back slope above the blocks toward the alley at a ratio of 1 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (1H:1V) slope has been proposed. Ground elevation at the alley varies from 132 to 134 feet, and the proposed basement floor is 123.9 feet. Excavation depth to the bottom of the footing would range from approximately 10 to 12 feet. According to the geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E., two test pits were excavated in the alley to a depth of 7 feet. Soils observed in the test pits consisted of very dense, well - graded sands and gravels. Based on our experience, these soils are representative of those known to exist in this area of Edmonds. Groundwater was not observed after the test holes reportedly remained open for 22 hours. 400 NORTH 34TH STREET • SUITE 100 21-1-20194-001 P.O. BOX 300303 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 206.632.8020 FAX 206.695.6777 TDD: 1.800.833.6388 City of Edmonds Attn: Ms. Jeanie McConnell November 1, 2004 Page 2 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. Based on our review, the proposed ecology -block shoring system is an acceptable means of providing excavation support along the alley at 107 Seventh Avenue North. We recommend the geotechnical engineer of record observe and document to the City of Edmonds that: ► Excavation soils are similar to those observed in the test pits. ► Cut slope to construct the ecology -block shoring is stable and will not impact the adjacent alley and any critical underground utilities. ► Subgrade soils to support the block wall are suitable for bearing. ► Construction of the block wall is in accordance with geotechnical engineer's recommendations. ► Wall backfill material is acceptable (it appears that on -site sand and gravel would be suitable) and densely compacted. ► Backfill material placed above the block wall is stable at III: IV slope, as shown on the Denis M. Bruce, P.E., detail dated September 29, 2004. A 2'/z-inch minus crushed rock would be an alternative unless the on -site soil can be compacted to the III: IV slope. During wet weather, the upper steep slope should be covered with plastic sheeting to control erosion. The geotechnical engineer should visit the site and document shoring wall stability and erosion control during and after periods of heavy precipitation, e.g.,'h inch or more rainfall per day. We recommend the contractor establish a series of points along the alley to record vertical and lateral deformation. Readings should be taken weekly during the excavation and shoring construction, and monthly thereafter. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 695-6801. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Thomas M. Gurtowski, P.E. Vice President TMG/tmg 21-1-20194-001-LR 1.aoc/wp/eet 21-1-21094-001 06/05/2007 07:41 4253343473 A BAT AND SERVICE PAGE 02 A -BAT Backilow Assembly Testing and Service CL A -BAT * * * 990DZ P.O. Box 8374 Everett, Waehlnoon 98803 • (425) 334.6423 Fax, (425) 334-3473 AACSKLOW PRSV8N9 8R I2V8P80TI0N 4 T88T REPORT PURVEYOR ID 0 .NEW)o EXISTING ❑ REPLACEMENT ❑ NAME OF PREMISEZzz:�Zgr� • COMM. jo RES. ❑ SERV. ADDRESS 246Y- CITYm,/ am ZIP: CONT. PERSON, - jrA,- . t X ig h&A4 PH:&(e,,r -3 -V-02 FAX: Ada W97 -9-G&f o3 �i�l OWNER/P,lf •r,t, MAIL ADDRESS CONT. PERSON _ LOC. OF ASSEMBL DOWN9MEAM PROC S-d ,ddl ❑ RPBA �DCVA ❑ PVBA, ASSEMBLY i d`/(,/V MANUFACTURER USC ApproYS11® Currently Approved CITY:S��/4d%,_�IP: 1 &/7 7 PH: G AO&3-Y=FAX: , 6 c - l If DCDA ❑ SVBA PROP. INSTAL J.YES ❑ NO Z. MODEL SIZE SERIAL NO. Not Currently, But Was Approved Wden Installed ❑ Never Approved Llf�llq.ri�C�l►7Va\CrA• •w•wv� •.w. -- - - .�_T-- --- �� PVBA/SVBA Ajr inlet 7WChmwkN& 'I Ptwed Failed leaked ❑ Ltalt+d .�..,---.•••,�•••••• Cload'li� Opedsd at — -�� NI C'k.ok PSID PSID Opened •e PSID Did Not Open ........................ [I Cloud 71SLt ...............,... Improperly •, �� P8ID r P81D Air Gap OKT Check Iva lutaUsd Held at PSID l.aked.................................... Now Pent AW Repairs ❑ Cleaned ❑ Cleaned ❑ '' Cleaned Repaired ❑ Repaired D Repaired .❑ ❑ Cleaned ❑ Repaired Kit 'lest Mer Repairs Cloud TteDt , „......._...aM.. ❑ Closed 7*1.......................... ❑ Opened at PSID Air Inlet PSID Pawl ❑ p91p PSID Il Check PSID Check Valve PSID Failed (] AIR GAP INSPECTION: Required gains Dum air Sap separation provided? ❑ YES-W NO F/S: T/A: ❑ YES C,NO MONITOR PHt , �!A- ACCT. M CONFINED SPACE; ❑ YES XNO CONFINED SPACE PROCEDE: ❑ YESJZLNO F/S RESTOREDt TIME: ,._, ❑ AM ❑ PM DATE: 4 METER NO:I ' 4U /A METER READING: REMARKS: p CEROT NO. B•3491 DATE: G TESTED BY: PRINT NAMT: RON J.13NG USC TEST PROCED.-RYES CL: A-BAT*9*990DZ SPC: INSAYES ❑ NO BOND:_%YES ❑ NO MAKE: �0� '� u' P_.57' MODELt � TK-5 9N:111g .i d. CAL DATE: REPORTTO.' � 1.ui„g. M c,14 vRY4 11� REPORT RECEIVED BYt (Glid _ �9ERV. RItSTORED� YES[] N0 RECEIVED TIME J U N, 5, * 8 : 44 9vwy '` 'Kti0w-0"" .ajz lv� �S?ROp IF :7 gaPnDAC.4-1 CODE, 1997 & TIONS, ETC. (D P, ENERGY CODE, A 5 4TERIAL AND CONTRACTOR ID ALL WORK V, TALL COMPLY COMPONENT DIMENSIONAL AND CITY OF Z.::) AND SAFETY LABOR AND MINISTRATION 5 JURISDICTION. ST, RECORDS La 14 a nnd 5 kT THE SITE. I II 41-A'w AND ACTUAL lit 1 129.15 ONS OR NEED DE ADEQUATE I W v'a.vAb_ 1:3 DIMENSIONAL 4e D. 4-1. '2 �) C F. ) % MCRETE OR 7 4-- w REQUIRE FOR -xi5 INDEX OF DRA ,-r ARCHITECTURAL E IN SLEEPING 1^9 A -I SITE/ROOF P- YA. -�r FULL SITE SE IRED BY FIRE 1 NORTH TO S( .5 CALCULATIOr Poe ZV- Z.9 t.5 7, GENERAL No IG OF 5.7 SO, IISHED FLOOR A-2 BASEMENTFi WAer law, ED DISPOSAL PAI t ENGINEERING A-3 FIRST FLOOR Is NOTES - TYP: MECHANICAL 0 WHOLEHOUS ALL HAVE U -1-110 ebi -ts 4 A-4 SECOND FLO( ALL GLA7JNG ATTIC VENTI, (SHED FLOOR RD 54-2, SEC i A-5 BUILDING ELE Il' TYPICAL EXT.: ,CES. GUARD AIR LANDING i i A-6 BUILDING CRC LEAD NOSING; A-7 BUILDING CRC d- PROVIDE AIR FLOW AT STRUCTURAL INSULATION S-1 FOOTING ANC CONCRETE & L AMERICANII I NOTES & OET ,LL UNITS TO Lime REAj maLiL S-2 GROUND FLO1 Z5 ;-WAI-Ls sex- C4 6L IZO PLAN, SHEAR I DEAD BOLT S-3 FIRST FLOOR L L 117.&r. L EXTERIOR N. FZOP. PLAN, SHEAR DETAILS S-4 SECOND FLOC ERVATIVE OR Its F-L I IID,1-0 SHEAR WALL LOCATIONS. RECEIVED S-4 STRUCTURAL 4G BPI ?m UN 2 8 2004 CIVIL C-1 SITE DRAINA( ED - BYSadbacks Require Actual CONTOURS A/ P� RMIT COUNTER to C-2 ORIGINAL SIT to EN-1 ENERGY CODE INSULATION; Other BUILDING HE? N VOLTY WINDOW SCH feiCft 1��IS THE MA��AAT THE 6 AVE. N A :T_ - C4 IS DESIGNATED SEWER MANHOLE 29. THE INVERT VJL EN-2 VENTILATION NEER. FIELD ELEVATION IS 104.96. IT'S RIM ELEVEATION IS 111.72'. 'T 0 I I q)I .� o — — — — 1 I tn 0 3' X5' PAV I NCB GUTS 099 EX. 2" PE I P 6 --q n?=�° PINGH >%U5�- — 40T, C� t-,- 6'N CI EOM - / - 40(5' E 56o' 5- C� PKOP. 2" WE I MAIN 6 ' N (� WU GAS MAIN ID SIZE INSTALLATIONI RETIREMENT LENGTH T ,-,JE JFACTURER 2" 160' M26 GAS MAIN PRESSURE & TESTING TYPE TEST: PRESSURE; TESTED BY: DATE ON: / / TIME ON: _ DATE OFF: / / TIME OFF: DATE ON'. / / T I ME ON: DATE OFF: ITIME OFF: DESIGN: PSIG SYS MAOP: PSIG 60' 1 i I NOTES: The City of Edmonds 1. e I ft Q LOGATf ALL Of I L I f i 06) GALA, 24 HOURS WOKE 01GGING= 1-600-424-5555 2. 5URV6Y 15 NOf REOUIREO. 3. MA I NfA I N A MINIMUM 09 5' HOR I ZONfAI ANO 3' VERf I GAL GLBARANGO r%ROM ALL G I fY Uf I L I f I f6 AND APPURfBNANG66. 4. GUf6 IN PAVING ARE SHOWN A5 S IN PAVING ANfIGIPAf60. MANAGBRs OOUG 061TAL0 425-356-7520 RR3..va.6 ji 4 1 Not for �Ojj ,, uctjotl CALL 1-800-424-5555 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG TPIC CKFTCN NnT Tn RF RFITFn IIPnN FOR FXACT LOCATION OF FACILITIES 5 / / REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT PERMIT E0MON05 4 / / 3 / / FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE NO DATE 2 / / PROJECT MGR: Q. U5 I A1.0 (425) 356 -7520 09/ 06, 0 1 / / APPROVED BY: T,. 07 )q6 -7012- REV# DATE BY DESCRIPTION ENGR - GAS: COUNTY SNOHOM 15H MER SEC Work Center NSNH& DRAWN BY: 0. N&UYEN (425 )290 7026 09/06/ 00 REVISED BY: 1/4 SEC 5W — 24 — 27— 3 OP MAP 160.062 PLAT MAP 163.066 APPROVED BY: FOREMEN #1 : U-MAP# (POWER) CIR MAP# CIRCUIT# FOREMAN #2: MAPPING: JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS UTILITIES CONTACT PHONE# 2" WO 119 MAIN f XTON61 ON PUGET SOUND f0 SERVE: ENERGY 660 01EW 5T INCIDENT# DRAWING# SAP SUPERIOR ORDER# 107009730 SCALE: 1" . .. , . . I 5:: •, z +1 s .':i ;, �' =tit,:,,:,.. .. (:°�. t I:!osjl . ! �ik, a , , c� 4 - / I � .. p Nome.. l�/ j a w� � 0 � .. 1.p t � r M , ��L �([ 62�f i1. �'T'' `.P S�cee:k �1 _ > . �� ,: ;.. v F4 , __. - • _._..._ Iu),9`0 r.. I 'y' 1 IL " L ,I10 ��I __ I 11 _ d + -". 1 7r +"f' I n 1,�, .. 01- .... _.. . . �, ____. ___.____ _..� _ ___.__.�__.. _._.._ --- _�.._ __-___.____._.-__---..-.:- _ -- _ I . o1 ;�; 1 ,r. __ 1 c�' I -I'I' aP-L.II4 I - -....---_.---_. _...-.. _ _ .. ...-.---_► . �,� ._.L.[u�) � ; , . �-'� Wit.., I..tct�f�; `id '�� .: co , w S.P I.4 all" - :4" 1c. • __ ._ L��. : -Rr I �> it a! '* �,,. __j/ Lo ! . � r q ,r I tI'll123---t4-r .. -- _ _ _ _ _ - . 0 - �.� -- - ` ry. __. ,t �_ % „�. . ,r �. .. _ 1i . w _ ... .. - .. - _ . _ 1 S - � � u � N ire r� .ny, i pY }�' + , � i Y 3pl? < . 1(1;F. • ,.+.+,,,.,•.'1 y„�„ti f4 `.Ai .ten.. Gn '� (;F ERAL NOTES _ -� --- -- F,� f �� ; a CCITY OF EDMONDS &CODE IN >." _/) r. � F +, 44p� �i;1�d 5 "! '7 It h 3 : ; �» ' I . f \ G7 f Y '� 15 "1 ti(4 T} ire G l : .•'.1 .: �w :'::: K ,rI t 1. ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1997 EDITION EXCEPT �. - S. t , �v u, , '1 . WHERE LOCAL JURISDICTION HAS MADE AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, ETC, y �;. > : I}'� `'�' �'`� '� '� 0 �t'I ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD APPROVAL: EXEMPT II j� `�. I _ 1`*l.'4i•`�'rr.,��•,'•a''�,d +�h;. �1 Fes. +�+'ntw•,a• - ." .. �'..F' �. - -* '4 - 1 - z t�k r� ' Y4"r'}r �c � '` H..i f'r I� .Iol �I Ct ;''j .' NIFORM BUILDING CODE W/ STATE AMENDMENTS 2. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION, WRITTEN AS -BUILT VERIFICATION BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD MUST BE 0 _t \51 ' •s` � ,, �;,;' �k�[' " .:� HI 4 P1 � CODES: 1 997 U I � .< 1, - ,�y� .,. � , .... , T T THE REQUIREMENTS EN A - - i 11 a ufa t; a n;>F U° a �,:: r J ';. '`.:; 'r. 1997 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE WITH STATE AMENDMENTS . PROVIDED TO THE CITY BUILDING DIVISION SHOWING THAT THE LOWEST FLOOR MEETS H QU EM TS OF - _j {� ,�,it�1�' y� �{y 1 997 UNIFORM FIRE CODE WITH STATE AMENDMENTS BASEMENT PER THE STORY CALC S ON SHEET A-7 �_ � . + �` i W , ;`t I � ��, y.; :, ;;•. y A h 2j � PLUMB. CODE 7/1 /02 W/ STATE AMENDMENTS �O - ��5�" ' 2000 UNIFORM �t �t ,� ( ) v • I :{aft 5.•I �� .M i�"` •wr.. .1 n.�w w vw 4�s _"'4 2001 WA. STATE ENERGY CODE, 2ND EDIT. (1/1/03) 3. THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS IS ACCOMPANIED BY A SET OF MATERIAL AND PERFORMANCE _ - I U, ,.;:,..` ..fs ,Y ]«�R.,. ,� w „ .ALITY CODE 7/1/01 SPECIFICATIONS 8 1/2" X 11 FORMAT TOGETHER WITH AN OWNER/CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT. THESE DOCUMENTS. 0 jI ; � •.„::'- -W. .::. ^^'`+••�, si,'t�' 2001 WA. STATE VENTILATION INDOOR AIR QUALITY ( ) ( ) II IV rl �.. _ 1 1 ( r ,!� sq t1i , � ' 2000 WA STATE BARRIER FREE CODE 7/1/01 ACT AS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ALL WORK RELATED TO SAID DOCUMENTS IS TO BE N CURRENT EDIT EDMONDS COMM DEVELOPMENT CODE SUPERVISED BY THE ARCHITECT. '`" ! R, to _. r . h - Kc , I711t?nt � t1� 4 A- . ^ �' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VN 4. GENERAL CONTRACTOR, ALL SUB -CONTRACTORS, ALL MATERIAL SUPPLIERS SHALL COMPLY STRICTLY TO _ryp I t�wa F'PI '�,, N NT MANUFA TURERS DELIVERED + -' ' .... 2 STORY +BASEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ALL PRODUCT, PRODUCT ASSEMBLIES AND COMPO E C / t� I [ , t :_: t ZONING: RM 1 .5 T0, INSTALLED IN OR PROVIDED AND/OR STORED OFF SITE ~� h �' �r ' nth t _- { ..c - _ _ t II 9y �. . ,s i � .1. r jr An I '1`C t�I , s�1h � RPI � : FY DIMENSIONS OF ALL PRE -MANUFACTURED FRAMING MEMBERS AND DIMENSIONAL LUMBER AT JOB I' ,11. `" *:: • [ E` " ° �' OCCUPANCY TYPE: GARAGE U-1 5. VERI ' _ = �i" _ 1 f rrph .P y� I. s - „ _ �. D CITY F EDMONDS IN WRITING. I a �` �.,,>, ..:: ' .. :: I, .. SITE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO ARCHITECT AN C 0 j of • STORAGER00 S S \ 6. CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL HEALTH AND SAFETY 0 ' ��""��111 " RESIDENCES & R-3 STANDARDS/REQUIREMENTS AS SET BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, e JJ �F 1�� ff�"" ;'I E AL OFFICE OF SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OSHA OR ANY GOVERNING -�""' - 1 I f �7; w . t :r t COMMON AREA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, FED R ( ). ,. , . r 4 . LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL PROVIDE TO CONTRACTOR I +1 I r � .. + ir OCCUPANCY LOAD: AND ARCHITECT UPON REQUEST, RECORDS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OR ALL OF THE ABOVE AGENCIES. '. _ _ y , �- ( � :: I � �7~ � ^-,P . BASEMENT 9.28 7. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY GRADES, DIMENSIONS, AND EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE. NOTIFY THEI , ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO'IA, . - - - - t1; 7.44 COMMENCING WORK. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF OMISSIONS OR NEED FOR CLARIFICATION, ETC., r - - 1 ST FLOOR:, - '� - • Q.,, EXCAVATION AND FOUNDATION SUB -CONTRACTORS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING AND BRACING PRIOR TO AND - - . . a-, � .. 2ND FLOOR: 8.32 DURING WORK. . t ,� _. TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOAD: 25.04 8.' CONTRACTOR AND SUB -CONTRACTORS TO NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF DIMENSIONAL , �' T. .1 - I v DISCREPANCIES, OMISSIONS, OR NEED FOR CLARIFICATION. I I r , SEISMIC ZONE: 3 _--LVl�'i,"X'. t I� I. +� INDEX OF DRAWINGS . - .• . rl. 6 . 1. 9. DIMENSIONS SHALL GOVERN OVER SCALE OF DRAWINGS. �� A.:.I . `� I • A%k ✓�; rFS i4� I \ _ - Ay) c _ _. .. - I �`� - -__- -- - _ \ 'R „ ��.iy111TE�TIIR�� ' - __ I BUILDING AREr,S & �PELI.�F{C.. 10. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OR LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO POURING ANY CONCRETE OR COVERING ANY .-Fl _r.l I - _ `'`_I. I �'� _ I " " - MBINED AREAS: PERMIT AUTHORIZED PORTION OF WORK. SEPARATE NAILING INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR EXTERIOR SHEAR WALLS. -' 50 I K'J�!!~V+[�✓ 1 BUILDING CO 9 rx"T'�tLZ� i I i! iO :: frr # C A-1 SITE/ROOF PLAN, CODE INFORMATION, 1. I• INN , ti, JIA . � . I FULL SITE SECTIONS -EAST TO WEST & 11. PROVIDE COMBUSTION/SMOKE DETECTORS, INTER -CONNECTED TO DEVICE AUDIBLE IN SLEEPING AREAS I' BASEMENT LEVEL: AND ADJACENT HALLWAYS AND POWERED BY BUILDING LINE VOLTAGE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUIT W/ BATTERY BACK-UP. - . ..�-• - r t+- / \ r ` \� -- I NORTH TO SOUTH, BUILDING HEIGHT GARAGE AREA 1734 SQ.FT. / I I � L.12I Ali -• + � mI�IB+N9� �`' � \ CALCULATIONS, LOT COVERAGE STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT 727 SQ.FT. ��r I EL Ii' GENERAL NOTES, Q 12. PROVIDE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OF TYPE AND LOCATIONS SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY FIRE MARSHALL ,, , ! I • • ' STAIRS,ELEV, ENTRY & HALLS , 514 SOFT. WITHIN JOB SITE JURISDICTION. , -- �� ( _�___ �' A-2 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" SCALE 13. EGRESS WINDOWS FROM SLEEPING ROOMS TO HAVE MINIMUM NET CLEAR OPENING OF 5.7 SQ. FT.; MINIMUM 1. COMBINED BASEMENT FLOOR AREAS 2975 SQ.FT. 2,975 SQ.FT. x11 HEIGHT OF 24"; MINIMUM WIDTH OF 20'; MAXIMUM SILL HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR SURFACE OF 44". 0 . . - 6 :I"iwlpI A-3 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" SCALE (BUILDING FOOTPRINT) _� -1. IhJ1"' i�>.Ca AL �°-'t1�11w, s :i10't�.%1(4, WHOLE HOUSE VENT C C 14. ROOF AND FOOTING DRAINS ARE TO BE TIGHT -LINED SEPARATELY TO APPROVED DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 0 I r- t5G, 'S FIRST FLOOR LEVEL: STORM DRAINAGE CONTROL SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STANDARD PLAN ATTIC VENTILATION UNIT 100 2,372 SQ.FT. OF THE JURISDICTION GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. WINDOW SCHEDULE 393 S . FT. i� ' a . F DECKS Q 210 SOFT.` " i�'aa�`,1 A-4 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 /4" SCALE STAIRS 15. GLAZING: ALL GLAZING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1994 ENERGY CODE AND SHALL HAVE U-VALUE � , .l STICKERS ATTACH THROUGHOUT FOR VERIFICATION BY LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIAL. ALL GLAZING WITHIN 12" OF A (p �. MECHANICAL NOTES S ( -� �� I WINDOW SCHEDULE COMBINED FIRST FLOOR AREAS 2,975 SQ.FT. 2,975 SQ.FT. DOOR, SHOWER OR BATH ENCLOSURE OR WITHIN 1 -6 OF THE FINISHED FLOOR SURFACE SHALL BE -'i + TEMPERED/SAFETY GLASS, LABELED IMPACT -TYPE PER UBC STANDARD 54-2, SEC 5406. B I . (BUILDING FOOTPRINT) : � I ` r.Iw Ize�,kod, , ! A-5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS . " .y %L._oi%t.. 16. GUARD RAILS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3 -O ABOVE FINISH FLOOR OR DECK SURFACES, GUARD RAILS IN PUBLIC Ilz _+.-Sl I lr,,�h �. I . TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL SECTION DETAILS SECOND FLOOR LEVEL: AREAS TO BE 3'-6" MINIMUM ABOVE FINISH FLOOR SURFACES (i.e. STAIR LANDING RAILING). STAIR HAND RAILS TO '� ___ _,.__ _ _ UNIT 200 2,371 SQ.FT. :. o -� _ ...T- r _ __ .._-_ . -_ _. _ _ _ _ _ __ EXTERIOR DECKS SOFT. BE A MINIMUM OF 34" TO A MAXIMUM OF 38" ABOVE TREAD NOSING; RAIL MATERIAL FROM 1 1/4" MINIMUM TO 2 " I _t '1' �;� -w--.- ---_ --- --- -- -- -- - A-6 BUILDING CROSS SECTION (1/4" SCALE) DIAMETER MAXIMUM. ! f 7 i6 kt I - . - - STAIRS 210 SQ.FT.. __ c� _ __ 11 . 17. PROVIDE ROOF/ATTIC VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY UBC, SECTION 3205 (C). PROVIDE BAFFLES BETWEEN �� ! �* 12.."7 _ ;' �` A-7 BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS (1/4 SCALE) COMBINED SECOND FLOOR AREAS 2,936 SQ.FT. 2,936 SQ.FT. INSULATION AND STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE AIR FLOW AT EAVES. PROVIDE ATTIC .Ifs J,/ r , ACCESS PER SECTION 3205 WITH WEATHER-STRIPPING AND INSULATION BAFFLES AS REQUIRED. x[ STRUCTURAL 18. PROVIDE BARRIER -FREE ACCESS AND STANDARDS AS REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL "AMERICAN DISABILITIES?� . � I . I � I �l el e - .. . . . ffl%l�l -4- / + . : '' � "� /r t 1�G:1�:5 .y�IJhL.t�> S-1 STRUCTURAL DETAILS &SCHEDULES COMBINED AREAS - ALL FLOORS 8,886 SQ.FT. . / % _ ACT" AND WASHINGTON STATE BARRIER -FREE CODE RCW 51-20-3100. ALL UNITS TO BE "TYPE B" DESIGNATION. ._--� -- - a�-- �-.. _•.« «�.:-• ��.. „ ,� ,„l� • ., �_ „ �, ,�... , ,� �� . :._... �� LAN, LOT COVERAGE (45�Yo MAX) 19. INDIVIDUAL UNIT EXIT DOORS AND COMMON EXIT DOORS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH DEAD BOLT INDEPENDENT I ;, -., /� CONCIRETE &DSTEELDDETIOAILS, STRUCTURAL . � .. . , "I°6w .117. . . .. OF KNOB/KEYSET, OPERABLE WITHOUT KEY FROM THE INTERIOR. ALL EXTERIOR OPENINGS TO BE CAULKED, - `+.,, C. o TE E IL UNIT AREA +DECKS 2,975 SQ.FT. N. tcP. L.IN F .. -. . . GASKETTED, OR WEATHER-STRIPPED. rtFe N D TA - ."1 rX `1*al:. - S-3 GROUND FLOOR WALLS, FIRST FLOOR FRAMING . tY_. . COMMON USE AREA 215.5 SOFT. 20. ALL WOOD EXPOSED TO THE EXTERIOR SHALL. BE PRESSURE TREATED WITH PRESERVATIVE OR BE OF A 115= t-:I I -`!�-1. • 11.2� 1 7 1'(�' . L SCHEDULE 2 975.0 S .FT. SPECIE HAVE NATURAL RESISTANT TO DECAY. . � _�_� '3Fj+,do 2p' O'" `' 1 PLAN, SHEARWALL SC E Q�� ---- - ----'- ---- . 21. PROVIDE WATERPROOF GYPSUM WALL BOARD AT ALL SHOWER, SHOWER/TUB LOCATIONS. PROVIDE NO . . N BOARD ANDSTRUCTURE.�, T - ^� S-4 FIRST FLOOR WALLS, VAPOR BARRIER BETWEEN 0 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING '. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA = 2,975 SQ.FT.--- L SCHEDULE, STRUCTURAL -^.�_ LL CWCti __- _ _.. _ (al.lr_-_ _ _ ___ -_ _.- . - - - PLAN, SHEAR WALL E S CTU MAX. LOT COVERAGE (45%) = 2,975 SQ.FT. . 22. FIRE -BLOCKING AS PER SECTION 2516 UBC. PROVIDE 1 1/2" SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN STRINGERS AT MID- �I�T' S,Ip)µr+41. .� + DETAILS afti . . ACTUAL LOT COVERAGE ,a 45.0% - // _�_ _ 'G. RUN. PROVIDE 1 1 /2" SOLID BLOCKING BETWEEN STUDS AT STRINGERS. MEMBRANE PENETRATION OF THE FIRE _wto-_ . . . RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE FILLED WITH"SPEC SEAL LCI", ASTM E814 (UL 1479).. _ _ __ _ ; m. �s_M _. ems: � "`^ S-5 SECOND FLOOR WALLS, ROOF FRAMING PLAN __ _ I. I BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: . ® `C�' �'- �" <--• I'T ,, ��. SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE _ 1. 23. PROVIDE BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS AND INDIVIDUAL UNIT NUMBERS AS REQU. 61IRED BY LOCAL BUILDING BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: AUTHORITY. ,I CIVIL t . FP�' . 24. MAXIMUM FLAME -SPREAD CLASS AND INDEX (SECT. 4202, TABLES 42-A & 42-B)`� %� 5�-fn .. . AVERAGE. EXISTING GRADE = 127.06 -._.__ ' _.-_-. _------_.._._�__-..-_._ _ _ ---.----.___._ __: _ :_:__ ..._�_._._� --- _- i C-1 SITE DRAINAGE, ROCKERY RETAINAGE [120.08 + 122.0 + 13.3.41 +132.751 / 4 I. v ENCLOSED VERTICAL EXITWAYS 0 25 6. 15'.C>" _+,c'+ - I<:T." I - ----- --- - ... - --- - __ - _- _ ..- __ . 508.24/4 127.06 _._. _..----_-.,.__. _ C-2 ORIGINAL SITE SURVEY ROOMS OR AREAS 76-20o PARKING STRIP PLANTING SCHEDULE ALLOW. BLDG PEAK H; IGHT ** _�- C-3 E NG A ED GR G PLA (AS RECOMMENDED BY RICH LINDSEY ^^ "I"'- p S I. . . . XISTI ND ROPO ADIN N -,- r . 6 1 .. .25. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, LOW VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL, 6 6� 1.1-1 I 1 6 . 6 1 6 6 . ALLOW PEAK6 � - .- . 1 6 HEIGHT FROM GRADE 1 57.06' ELEVATOR, FENCE, & SIGNAGE. CITY OF EDMONDS PARK DEPARTMENT) - - 1. . I I . . .1 . . . SYMBOL SPECIE .4. .. , FEB 2 ZOO8 I I �'- .:. - . I 26. SPECIAL INSPECTION ON SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FOR FOOTINGS BY LICENSED ENGINEER. FIELD REPORTS .. • -, ; Il p e! i? e,t.� ; -_ *e tt i CUTTING AND FILLING SUMMARY TO BE SUBMITTED TO CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT q C ! --- -�- - : . .. �' t .. ' I -- " .PERMIT COUNTER . .r PE ; B KATSURA TREE . . SEE C{VILS ENGINEERING SHEET C-1 ::.. • ....�.� tlg4wl V d _11 k3ria . . 6- • . _4v_ot ID-` ,-dw . I � I I . 11 N _w U M - 2 UNII "L S I . BELL PLACE CONDOM. IL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 19 & 20, . I . BLOCK 98, VOL 2, PAGE 39 OF 107 7th AVENUE E NORTH PLATS, CITY OF EDMONDS, EDMONDS WASHINGTON 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.4342-09s-019-0002 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WA, . 2570 RE61STERED flR ITE W. JAMES H. IRWIN T OF WRSNiNbTON J AM aldS ASSOCIATES., . . ***ARCHITECT*** 2507 N.W. 202ND STREET, SHORaELINE, WA. 98177 CELL PHONE: (206) 683-4592` FAX: (206) 546-9681 F j ,t NOTES: 1, CAI CHBASINS TO BE CONS'I RUCI L•:D IN ACCORDANCE W1111 ASIM C 476 (AASI-ITO M 199) & ASTM C 890 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN 'THE WSDOT/APWA SPECIFICATIONS, 2. REINFORCING SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO WELDED WIRE FABRIC HAVING A MINIMUM AREA OF 0,12 SQUARE INCHES PER FOOT. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL COMPLY TO ASTM A 497 (AASI-ITO M221). WIRE FABRIC SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE KNOCKOUTS. 3. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST BASE SECTION MAY BE ROUNDED, 4, PRECAST BASES SHALL 13E FURNISHED WATT CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS. KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MINIMUM. 5. KNOCKOUTS MAY BE ON ALL 4 SIDES WITH MAXIMUM DIAMETER OF 28", KNOCKOUTS MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR "0" SHAPED. PIPE TO BE INSTALLED IN FACTORY SUPPLIED KNOCKOUTS. 6. KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUIF..R DIAMETER PLUS CONCRETE INLET WALL THICKNESS. 7. THE TAPER ON THE SIDES OF THE PRECAST BASE SECTION AND RISER SECTION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2" PER FT. 8. CONCRETE INLET FRAME AND GRATE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WSD07/APWA SPECIFICATIONS AND MEET THE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATION RR-•F-621 D. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT, 9. FRAME AND GRATE MAY BE INSTALLED W1111 FLANGE DOWN OR CAST INTO RISER. SEE TEXT SECTION 5-06 WSDOT/APWA PLAN 1-A CATCHBASIN TYPE 1-L tlj ,.II►'I•�� ' MIN, RADIUS -4'-S- QUARRY SPALLS W-12' MIN, DEPTH O,(. JfT •�F ' safc�'J,J,Tp PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON At L. EROSION CONTR❑ MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN, RE=V�1s10NS STANDARD DETAIL 4 tVE 0 D. GEBERT 10/6/03 STABILM COPS AUCflQN D MM M NTS DW0 No' DATE 7,24/01 SCALE E1.2 I890-1990 FILTER FABRIC SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA, WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2' X 2' WOOD OR EQUIVALENT B'- 12' ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE 11 cu FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE 8' FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINOUS ROLLS, USE STAPLES PLACE 3/4'-1,5' WASHED GRAVEL IN OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FABRIC TO WIRE, FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE, o i i WIRE MESH SUPPORT FE�4E iv I I TO SUPPORT FILTER FA 41C• II II It T zo ---++--------------------T----�..I--- 11 II BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER w MATERIAL 8' TO 12- 6' MAX It tt L lJ \2- X 2- WOOD POSTS OR EQUIVALENT CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN, AFTER INS�pt-�ATloly oF'- WATER & SEWER $�►9{�tN A1> � ^'�N�T or sSM b" PVr REPLA-r-E C0AI(PE"I* ��4CA INSPECTIONS REQ'D. 61W LOCKING FRAME AND GRATE WITH ` YPE ,, r_08 RAMr-. LL 425-771.0220 0 13� �� P ``11 . r RTYur ,l� E��-� (SEE STD DWG 5-1 BO FOR DETAILS) dI= REV S U I LO I N1•J _ Ex e�,'v Top t4.68. LaCRTE EX WM IENE) = 113.4s-o07' VRIV11ysTaL.�,. New , Ilc(sw 113.5- IN CITY OF 'PER ! U� CHECK VALVE � " CtTy aF EbMau05 s A mDA RD ' 2"X4"X8" SOLID BRICK USED FOR FINAL ADJUSTMENT NEW WM J9i+4a►rEXt TO GRADE. 6" HIGH MAX. G• � gtl>EvJRL.1f•-'1'° >�4M�ttnf • OPr�'�IN6-tALL TEMP QUARRY icls-r, s11 walk UTA1zENb>t C°NszlZuG�� F t` LLTIcR FI�1 R,1G �E11C� SFAL.L I;N7RY 6" OR 12" CONCRETE I • �Z tl� `': - - --- - - -i ,r _ RISER SECTION SECTION CLASS 4000 CONCRETE PVC .joke M .r ___. aNCRETC 3 �� \ 0--- G $�F 3 N TYPE l C 49 SF c.►u �r� PL.ASIOC CONDUly r0 \ , To rAAt(7n1gY G MAGE W/ POWR UNE `\. IE�w) �I(l`�,04-oor nRly�-wAr sFwEt� F 1- 1/2' (501 40) PVC 11~[NV � I) 4.04- ► f� zQO sl- DE p(c�`fED c It�,Cul'j �Crlttl.s 'Co E �� , lEcCs 6" CONCRETE 71141 - REDUCING TOP SLAB T�•w N / _ -, ._„ c t SUMP PUMP CLASS 4000 CONCRETE LF 1 co ss 0 ►+ . NYDROAIATIC � � r Co ;� TROuGN Kii. - I N r p MODEL NO, w z.SA 1 �V _� .,,...�. (5EEvF.C.sBELOW) �I' - �3 t- OR EWAL o� c �� INSTALL TYPE- I C6 wl-M �(ZX�TED AID' PRECAST BASE SECTION MERCURY ONAFF FLOAT (MEASUREMENT AT THE TOP TYPE 1 CATCH ©ASIN ` `t� •I I ( ��•' � O Cf}TaE wI TN IN H R►4�1E" %� S U I REp bF THE BASE) S1MTG1 \\�� 2• I if iTl I I INSTpLI_ HDROMATIC { /4 HJ-) PUMP aR I m �. LO FQu1VAL-EAT AS SHOW M 6N AP_-rMI ••• THIS 5HEEr.• SUMP PUNp nffTMlL ,.,y. a 3 flUM� OU7F�W v CONN1r' TU 5AN17"A1LY' S&wEk rr- la IaCr✓E(� TANLE 'I�IGHTLINE � � ' �: z � I I I _ MATERIAL g . G$ .41 N. T- 5. x �' s I I Comm. STRU R� SDR 35 I TYpE I �1r I � H �' I N- 12 0 1 a r I TOP::III 1-1 ---- -- -- - I -� n 1' I Iwo l4, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR, ACCESSIAND GlSHAL BE POURED SEPARATELY p�(� -', III I I ItxSj�l15S"rN -li'2 SOH QO PVC RooFmp IMPERvj0Us 3 (400 5F •( FROM CURBPUmp C�tdl"C>lCt�'.�'tl>lriil'ICSi 1 U ! ( �i I I pRE55uPJe5D LINE P /Motor t(alt svihntrsla E)<ISTING ` : I i TIE To I g� INSTALL TWO CLEANOEITS, ONE Ai © p AulumfttMahIs W25A1 D25A1 w0ap �+ z° : ; I SANII�RY � 7'HF BUELDIN0,ANDONE.i AT'111.Ci (MlN1MUM) .1 1 SEVJER GhilZACGE FF l23 q � o Coµ"11 1 I p RIGI IT OF WAY SIDE OF THE ' Mtmrpowe 1/4 WALK-'1U OOTTM OF F'00 (INO, 11;a • ! PROPERTY LINE. C© fW Ued Amp 84 _ MEMO 1 I I NEW CURB AND GUTTER �. s JuIer i staH1i Pile {4 yolel CO •yh �ti�'�„ INSTALL 1/2' EXPANSION � - -- - - - - - - -- - JOINT MATERI L (TYPICAL) 1.I�.M. 1550 qp ( - - -- ~-��- -� R TOR 1O -y SE THE. - Iz2 73- `I'0 a 1 ko I - #Z CONTRACTOR EXPO cn ��co°oG oti� A 0 0 �. AGO - r �ocic�Rv Fool I Rr. FIRM _ C-p A ( L _LL Y \� 1 CAPPED 1.A1'IiRAL. '1'I lC LATERAL . '� 7-777 LLL_LL 3 115 REMOVE AND REPLAC _LLLL '77 LLL wca Nerli b0 MUSE' BE 6" MINIMUM. CURB AND GUTTER LLLLL RorkERY TYP. - ��3•�✓ ._ - _ _ LLLL 7� t4 Tompoisvre 12001 Ambioat--�-`- _ -- ---'---E7 L LLLL - -- ' LL LLLL L �/� I -0 LF FILTER rAB RI C FENCE _ sC LLL LLLL - x NEPAA D�si A •Z '� a � oQ L W r� � n •r FOOT I LLLLLLL ' 11ts1rlrtion OTC. F�1J U l � ' �. Class � - o V�1 • "foP of VVAIwL �- N B L DG LL $�,�I_ 4- ' TRACTION D IT IL Wsthnl a 5i><e i-1 /2" NPT 138n1r1► C13-*2- - TYPE t - L _LLL 9lSEE RAMP g _ PfZA I N-5 1-0 C 3 SEWER LATERAL NOTE: LLLL_ y" DWG # E2. 4 _LLLL �lti S�f H g 1/2" 113m1111i� �(,, \ 1 OP `' 1 .3 CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS SEWER - SIDE 12AMP SAW CUT AS REQUIRED ush Weigm 301bs. "'` �� '' "+vIL�� - 11�1. 2e ` i�lJr TIIrN E ENT. PUBLICE THE WORKS WILT, 1,12 ( YPICAL) Y"' �FTIF(s) - I 1 S.S 11`G FOOTING DRAINS NOT MIEN DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF, Power ford 18/3, Sim, 10' std. 1'Illi LATP,L f OR REUSE. I1pti d) - rilir�1N . V*LL 1P�-1 U(L TO BE TIED INTO �?,s--E-1 %-oz.3S �HI 1' TACTILE WARNING STRIP (TYPICAL) - nj�� , DETENTION SYSTEM -i-rrrrrl rr� �� ; i„p , EXIST SIDEWALK _10 0 5 10 20 SAW CUT AS REQUIRED 2H,1 V MAX D2> H 1 + H_2 4• D3 U(DO SET OVERFLOW AT TOP NOTE (IN FEET) `In OF DETENTION PIPE 1.AT LOCATIONS ;IERE NEW RAMPS ABUT EXISTING CURB, �- _ 1:1 MAX SLOPE FROM FRONT ,!01' TOP 1 Inch � 10 ft. -� ,,..;;,.,: GUTTERS, PLANTER STRIPS, AND SIDEWALKS, CONSTRUCT -�_ ?�'I''` = ROCKERY TO BACK OF BOTTOL? " ,CI(ERY NEW RAMPS TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES, 3 11T11 2,ALL CONCRETE 'SURFACES SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH, 6" PVC -OUT 3,CONCRETE SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH A CLEAR CURING COMPOUND C/G & SIDEWALK FORM OR SHALL BE COVERED AND KEPT MOIST FOR 72 HOURS. INSPECTIONS REQUIRED TY REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL APPRUM by D, GE T 10/6 0 CURB RAMP TYPE 4 DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS w0 NO. E2.17 1890-19g0 NOTE, 1, RAMP TEXTURING IS TO BE DONE WITH AN EXPANDING METAL GRATE PLACED AND REMOVED FROM WET CONCRETE TO LEAVE A DIAMOND PATTERN AS SHOWN. THE LONG AXIS OF THE DIAMOND PATTERN SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURB. 1_1/q• /` 1/4' GROVES SHALL BE 1/6' DEEP AND 1/4' WIDE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SURFACES SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH. NOMINAL DIMENSIONS TRACTION GRID PATTERN CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON FORM WORK PRIOR TO POUR, ACCESSIBLE AND GUTTER BE POURED SEPARATELY FROM 5.0' 3,5' (TYP) 1' WIDE TACTILE STRIP (TYP) ALL LOCATIONS SIDE RAMP 1112 MAIN RAMP (TYPICAL) SLOPE 1112 MAX I PLACE TRACTION (TYPICAL) 12'-18' 6' 4' MINIMUM RAMP SHALL BE FLUSH VARIES I WITH GUTTER LINE \ MAX SLOPE -��- - • d 47+. CONCRETE CURD AND GUTTER 95% COMPACTED SUBGRADE, ADD CRUSHED SEE DETAIL E-2,8 ROCK BASE AS REQUIQED (NEW CONSTRUCTION ONLY) S F C -T•T O N A 1/2• FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL REVISiorls STANDARD DETAIL �rrrmve r a+T� D. GEBERT 10/6/03 RAMP DETAIL FOR TYPE 3, 4 , AND 6 RAMPS I890-1990 DATE 7/24/01 11 SCALE NTS Drro No. E2.24 wID TN OF DRI�eMAY qT SEE ETAIL B W D�IV PROpFRl DErFRM HE�YDr CITrf % Y SIN f FIyC1Me fR XPANSION JOINT SEE NOTE 'A' EXPANSION JOINT 1.r-'12-- �S le, 30 24 MAk, f` rDeNrr Mqk �_CqR AL Ml �CdMME q� 4 EJGe UM NOTE, TYPE 'A' CURB AND GUTTER A- IF DRIVEWAY WIDTH EXCEEDS OR 15', INSTALL A FULL DEPTH EXPANSION 16' VERTICAL CURB JOINT. (TO MATCH EXIST. ONLY) DRIVEWAY APRON SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6' THICK AND SHALL BE PLACED ON EXPANSION JOINT 2' OF 5/8' CSTC AND COMPACTED GRADE. 61 CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3- 3000PSI 1/2' LIP Ii1. SLOPE 6' CURB DRIVEWAY CURB TRANSITIONAL DETAIL FOR CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE POURED CURB AND GUTTER OR VERTICAL CURBS SEPARATELY FROM THE SIDEWALK, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑N FORM WEI PRIOR TO POUR. g = a 2H:1V MAX v I Y UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL 3 `''s�7 &i' r�:�t t 2w�y}•7i':�rr ..a�.,.'�.'� zSr#��?If•1'3'i ' \ �uLL .;�u'"•".. t, \ 71-ILL 1 a' � � 4 TYP s�2% \\\ - 6 : �v I CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 OHEIGHT = 1/2 DIAMETER OF LARGEST ROCK IN BOTTOM COURSE OR 12", WHICHEVER IS 24 it 1, 6- - GREATER. AND pE t1 1110ti PIPS -6 O1'-0" 2 MIN WIDTH BETWEEN ROCKS EXCAVATION, BACKFlLL W/ 3/4" TO 4' INCH 1 sf"�s , �.:• -�[- ..o-r��.2.`1r:.,.,,�'i�s�,�T,> QUARRY SPALLS. Xy•. d77t !' - a•r•, . as _ U. PROVIDE SWALE, GRADE TO DRAIN TO 2�/, F`� APPROVED SYSTEM, 12" COMPACTED EQ EQ SOIL OR GRAVEL OVER GEOTEXTILE. 4U6 INCH DIAMETER MIN PERFORATED RIGID ('-p" V-O" MIN LEVEL I ' GROUND ® PROPERTY LINE z !� 3 d O W CASPERS ST J z Q O ^)� Q BELL ST MAIN ST WALNUT ST z d SITE r VICINITY MAT'' 2' MIN. COVER 11,1111f- `i J sn -•. 2r 6n T� COO IMj1T)� COMPACTED I/ NATIVE MATERIAL 2' DIA. DETENTION PIPE TRENCH FILLED WITH 3/4" TO 1-1/2" WASHED GRAVEL OR PEA GRAVEL 3' I 4n DETENTION PIPE BEDDING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 119 2' DIAMETER DETENTION PIPE 116.1 6" PVC TEE 114.1 113.6 6" PVC PIPE PVC CAP SECURE WITH ADHESIVE 9" MIN DRILL 0.1315" DIAMETER ORIFICE IN CENTER OF CAP CONTROL STRUCTURE C B #1 r-i TYPE 1- L NOT TO SCALE PIPE. SLOPE TO DRAIN & CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM (NOT DETENTION). PROVIDE CLEANOUTS. 5OGEOTDMLE FABRIC. 6UROCK FILTER LAYER, (Di "' CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: 12" MIN WIDTH. GENERAL NOTES: 1. CALL ENGINEERING INSPECTION LINE (425-771-0220 ext 1326) TO SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL VERIFY ROCKERY HEIGHT, FOUNDATION MATERIAL, NOTE: SET UP A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH OWNER, CONTRACTOR, 1. AND ROCK SIZE. SEE DETAIL E8.9 FOR DESIGN ENGINEER AND CITY ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE DUST CONTROL MEASURES AS 2. QUARRY SPALLS AND CRUSHED ROCK SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY FROM TRUCK REQUIRED INLCLUDING STREET SWEEPING. OR OTHER SUITABLE CONTAINER IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN CLEAN BACKFILL. 3. ROUGH GRADE, INSTALL STORM SYSTEM PER PLANS. 3. OPENINGS SHALL BE 'CHINKED' WITH QUARRY SPALLS.- A 2'-0" MINIMUM SHY DISTANCE 4. DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL INSPECT KEY PROJECT ASPECTS DURING 1 4. ROCKERIES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND STAMPED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEER IF ANY TIER IS GREATER THAN 8 FEET IN HEIGHT, IF VARYING FROM ROCKERY -AND PRIVATE ACCESS 5. FINAL GRADE, PAVE AND LANDSCAPE. THESE STANDARDS, OR IF THE CITY DETERMINES THAT SPECIAL CONDITIONS (SUCH ROAD SURFACE. AS CRITICAL AREA OR MEADOWDALE EARTH SUBSIDENCE LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA) EXIST. APP REVISIONS �� STANDARD DETAIL D. GEBERT 10/6/03 TIERED ROCKERIES DETAIL '� go GATE 4/1/03 ]77N:TS N0 NC. E8.10 90-19 Hll':i111"„0,:. `°1AY r,CNS•I•RUCl•ION PERMIT AND INSPECTION REQUIRED APPHOVED AS NOTED APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY L`NGII�ING Date: �►R�DI1�G A iTMES,' TOTA L CUT: 415 CY '(" OTT) L FILL'. I "l D C Y NOTE: 6RA0)N(; QUANTIF5 APE DOUGH CALCOLAT(OM5 TVIA7- DO N07- ACcOUNT R )IZ S01L. SWEL0169 Ok SHRIN KALE . CITY ENGINEER UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTILITIES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE AT 1-800-424-5555 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT THEIR LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATION OF SAID UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. DATE I -EXPIRES: 11 /05/05� EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION, STRAW OR OTHER MATERIAL TO COVER EXPOSED EARTH SHALL BE ON LOCATION AND READY TO USE. IF THE NEXT WEATHER DAY FORECAST IS RAIN, THE SITE SHALL BE COVERED AT THE END OF THE DAY. THE SITE SHALL BE COVERED IF THE NEXT DAY IS A NON -WORKING DAY. 2. SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO BE COVERED WITH VISQUEEN WITHIN 24 HRS. 3. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH GRADING FINAL LANDSCAPING IS TO BE INSTALLED OR HYDROSEED OR MULCH TO AREAS OF EXPOSED EARTH. 7}.l 1f r�i:►>I/U\}" hf "1h'I'I'''! } �'(-YL 1'- <`4'JYtIT?"�" ;. t�a(�•�,.p,t:,•�;, INSPECTION NOTE: PRIMARY CONTACT: 1. CALL THE CITY ENGINEER INPSECTION LINE (42.5-771-0220 EXT. 1326); APPLICANT/OWNER/DEVELOPER: SITE ADDRESS: 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR ALL ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS. JIM IRWIN PHONE: 206-542-9191 660 BELL STREET FAX: 206-546-9681 EDMONDS, WA 9B020 I?eVI51aN #1 : RESPOND To GR>~ TY PLAN REVIEW CoCTro9, z,�uc off•; pftT�' : s•ro•o4 PREPARED BY: DRAINAGE & TESC DESIGN R 1 D DONNA L. BRESKE, P.E. F 0 R OCT z 9 ' one 6621 FOSTER SLOUGH RD. PERMIT CO NTEE SNOHOMISH, WA 98290 JIM IRWIN N 2-UNIT CONDOMINIUM t PHONE: (425) 334-9980 FAX: (425) 334-7380 SCALE: 1" = 10' DRAWN DATE: 06/.R5/04 SHT NO. i OF 18.30.050 Development approval standards for erosion and sedimentation control (ESC) plan. A. ESC Minimum Requirements. All activities necessitating a clearing or grading permit and all utility projects consisting of more than 500 lineal i feet -of trench excavation shall be required to control erosion and sediment during construction and to permanently stabilize exposed soil resulting from construction. Projects involving a critical area may also be required to comply with any combination of the ESC minimum requirements. ' Compliance will be demonstrated through the implementation of an approved ESC plan. Guidelines for preparing ESC plans are provided in the ! manual. The plan must address the following requirements: 1. ESC Minimum Requirement — Construction Access Route. Construction vehicle access shall be, whenever practical, limited to one route. Access points shall be stabilized with quarry spalls or crushed rock to minimize the tracking of sediment onto public roads. If sediment is transported onto a road surface, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day. Sediment shall be removed from roads by shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area within 24 hours. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. 2. ESC Minimum Requirement — Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BMPs shall be selected, i designed, and maintained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no j soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven days from May 1 through September 30). 3. ESC Minimum Requirement — Protection of .Adjacent Properties. Adjacent properties shall be protected from sediment deposition by appropriate use of vegetative buffer strips, sediment barriers or filters, dikes or mulching, or by a combination of these measures and other i appropriate BMPs. 4. ESC Minimum Requirement — Maintenance. All erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be regularly inspected and maintained by the owner to ensure continued performance of their intended function. All maintenance and repair shall be conducted in accordance with the manual. 5. ESC Minimum Requirement — Other BMPs. As required by the city, other appropriate BMPs to mitigate the effects of increased runoff shall be applied. 6. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement — Underground Utility Construction. The construction of underground utility lines shall specifically address the following: a. Erosion control for excavated and stockpiled materials; b. The placement of excavated material where consistent with safety and space considerations shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches; c. Trench dewatering systems (must discharge into sediment traps, sediment ponds, or other acceptable means); d. Tracking and spilling of materials on streets due to hauling; e. Daily cleanup and street maintenance. 7. Additional ESC Minimum Requirements for Larger Developments. All new development and redevelopment that includes land disturbing activities of greater than, or equal to, one acre in addition to meeting the minimum requirements set forth above shall comply with ESC requirements listed below. 8. ESC Minimum Requirement — Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits. In the field, mark clearing limits and/or any easements, setbacks, j sensitive/critical areas and the buffers, trees and drainage courses. 9. ESC Minimum Requirement — Sediment Trapping. Prior to leaving the site, storm water runoff shall pass through a sediment pond or sediment trap, or other appropriate BMPs. Sediment ponds and traps, perimeter dikes, sediment barriers, and other BMPs intended to trap sediment on -site shall be constructed as a first step in grading. These BMPs shall be functional before land disturbing activities take place. Earthen structures, such as dams, dikes, and diversions shall be seeded and mulched according to an approved timetable. �* �:.. I.1a..�.o: c, c ell APPROVED AS NOTED / • ' BY ENGINEERING PP-1VISW Date: `© \ LINE OF BOTTOM'OF TEMPORARY :o SHORING, ECO-BLOCK WALL SEE SOILS REPORT AND AMENDED 8 1 /2"X11"'ATTACHMENT. �9 �21 ; PROVIDE SHORING @ �6 'FT OUT AND GREATER. ECO-BLOCK WALL NOT J --� TO EXCEED 5'-9" ABOVE LOWER GRADE CUT LINE 1$ N 01_.6 \ �vti%iNNOnf W14SON `N _ RECEIVED D 2578 REGISTERED ANC TE - S-R-1111WIN ..__. sn� ofi wRSKftvsmN . ...... ... ... JAMES R). & ASSO.ClArt"ES ***ARCHITECT*** -- 2507 N.W. 202ND STREET, SHORELINE, WA. 98177 CELL PHONE: (206) 6834592 FAX: (206) 546-9681 PERMIT COUNTER 6 ? . RECEIVED OCT 15 2004 PERMIT COUNTER STREET FILE irl BELL PLACE CONDOMINIUM 2 UNITS 660 BELL STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 TAX ACCOUNT NO.4342-098-019-0002 to Z i O - 305.6 Wry or W CL-L. 17t,t 2570 AEGISTERE© R HIT CT JAMES R. IRWIN TRTE OF WRSHINGTON {45 n r2, r2 rQ I pp _._ JAMES R...IRWIN _ ***ARCHITECT*** 2507 N.W. 202ND STREET, SHORELINE, OVA. 98177 CELL PHONE: (206) 683-4592 FAX: (206) 546-9681 4' a "' STREET FILE RECEIVED JUN 2 8 2004 PERMIT COUNTER I TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED U I r DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD -7. T !N '714t N. W4 T WORK 7y V NSPECTIDN REQUIRED BEFORE OTHER WO � :jf AN BEGIN -)s f SI1 Tj 7 4111' Pr 611 647,j 10, P ry, C. 4 j - VC 2. ESC Minimum Requirement — Stabi- lization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMPs, including, but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other 7ee f�i j 6 n', p-'Ta- s'-t i c - c o_ v- -e- r- in g -, 6 r- m' u-'] c h i n g j . All BMPs shall be selected, designed, and main- tained in accordance with the manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two days from October I through April 30 and no more than seven days from May I through Septem- ber 30). FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL I 20 BY 2" BY 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OR 210N 1 PROVIDE 3/4"TO 1.5".WASHED GRAVEL BACKFILL-U "'yM0r,74 17' IN TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE 2' BY 4' WOOD POST ALT. STEEL FENCE POSTS "N 510" RECEIVELJ SEP 2 9 2000 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS C-1 TY REVISIONS .1690- 1 99\1 O E .0M. 0 W'D S.- D,wia STANDARD D ETAI L 4.1 tAl, NNER '6 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DWG N 0' DATE S/10/98 I ' SCALENT! El.� MNG II W W;- j a 1'� e3 1.7