Loading...
10703 226TH ST SW.PDFiiiiiiii lill 3530 10703 226TH ST SW loZD3 !� • ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: f� 7b,3d,-j o0 31() Zo 0 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): —' 0 (0/ COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: CRITICAL AREAS : 1� J� DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required [Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT DRAINAGE PLAN DA PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): COLI— y 7 PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA' SCALED PLOT PLAN U-7 Vv- SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: 6 LOT:_ BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: 9s%5 SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED a1105wc�-cry LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Su=t File Checklist.doc - ac . 1 D, m 1' �f. 4. • �i 1 f Edmonds PERMIT NO: 9886 C o SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT EXPIRES 6 Address of Construction: LID # Property Tax Account Parcel No. (a_73Z5 202p ��1,✓ Attach copies of all access and utility easements Verified and Approved by Owner and/or Contractor: <S21eAlao m ak Contractor License #: Single Family ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ❑ Commercial (No. of Units ) ❑ Public ilding Permit Invasion into City *Right -of Way: Yes No *RW Construction Permit # 9,c��—a 161 Cross other-* *Private Property: ❑ Yes 1KNo **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. Owner VoritradWr signature and acknowledgement statement: By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. 10 8 e9 Date , 2 CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-4-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION 2 9 FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extensions M69 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS .. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Permit Fee $ 2 Repair Fee $ Issued By: SWISIOT-i 130 Date Issued:011, - - Assessment Fee $ Receipt No: 2�, City Permit Surcharge Fee 9 Total Fees Paid $ NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED. Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: fl?A IV05- Initial: As -built to Street File: ❑ 1,� PERMIT MUST BE•POSTED.ON JOB SITE t- White Copy, File Green Copy: Inspector ,pBuff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bldg;forms;sspermitjlg4/00 QVf"NSli1�(� I.U�„VYLU1 UAJ1y�l E*/ SEV WP W �114 'SVA k/q t)'F- C. i ro`l05 J. 7" Owe rp� (, tC W v i� Lo� % �P N153 ` �ronr► �,. c,.l L ( 1WoLrov, C � l -Crorn fx �� , rik NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). • • PLANNING DATA L. FILF NAME: I v � DATE: SITE ADDRESS: 10611 xa6 PLAN CHK# - O �- PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 6 ' e /- (' i 'vA f-ece lotlotl< RAT4v"Ce K-0 V ✓"-�' l- T yN iv REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?. es / No MAP PAGE: iO 3 CORNER LOT: es No FLAG LOT: es No ZONING: � � r 1)- _ CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: O 3 - I q? ❑ Study Required: Waiver ❑ Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) AExempt SETBACKS: 'k7 Required Setbacks: i Street: ASLeft Side: /o Right Side: to Rear: °Z S Actual Setbacks: Street: eft Si e: ght Side: Street map checked for additional setback required? Yes / No DN ❑. DETACHED STRUCTURES: �l ❑ ROCKERIES: ^ Ufa / " C) )l ❑ FENCES q (� l Q. BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: PARKING: Required: Actual: f vn (j / QK D /' Cat �►� r LOT AREA: LOT, COVE 11 Calculations: BUILDING IGHT, Datu Point: Datum El"Ion* Maximu owed: Actual Height: A.D.U. CREATED?: No / Yes SUBDIVISION: S — 0 3 1H LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: es N OTHER: NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC FRONT DOOR WINDOW 1.2WINDOW 2.5' copper 2 3,0' deep i coupling/steel clamps 1.5' 1.9' deep Q. 19 2.7' 1,5' deep 28' Q Q 5' 1.7' deep Q 35' R mm mm MMMMMIN 226 ST SW x OF Ego CITY OF EDMONDS T%ITA'"TERLINE- AS— BUILT ADDRESS 10703 226 ST SW HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR SERENA CONST. DATE DRAWN �&t. 1890 4/27/05 BY I. ABILA SCALE NTS PERMIT NO, 2004-0615 2 Ep*0 '� d ADDRESS DATE Z 3f -x Az CITE' 0_F` EDMONDS AS- BUILT WN CONTRACTOR ISCALE N❑, f DATE RECEIVED ,- '' PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS _JZONMOVIES USE r� PERMIT -� . ,//) L �� (1",", E ! ..., 'i'' - NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION �;���; ,` /�! JOB ADDRESS JJJJJJ _ _yF SUITE/APT# L+;}/Y� OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS .� t"a 1J�� (�� PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ w MAILING ADDRESS 3 -� O 1 O ` �� �...". t`.I PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PRO SED AW Pe Approved 13 RW Permit Required O Street Use Permit Req'd Inspection Required CITY ZIP ;�TELEPHONE k�I i,,,,, i" REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Required Underground Undev�alkrground '�. � Wiring required 0 NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED TNO. / YES ❑ NO ❑ c7 z P- ADDRESS x REMARKS w z O cc OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE Z W Umoo*fW-0VT--,0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME 0 t.>.1 ry ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE LICENSE NUMBER P OP.EryRTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ❑ ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ® FENCE X®FT) ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER CARAGE RETAINING ❑CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY WALL FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: D Q. Nllx t N li o -r 0, NUMBER j OF y, JJ STORIES / NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL/�, AREAS / ( �' (� NUMBER 7 DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE r . 1 V-3 0 • l__. % C4 HEAT SOURCE I GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % PLAN CHECK NO: �/ 1 1 VESTED DATE THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 7 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. E PERMIT APPLICATION: )SO DAYS PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FO ORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, D FEND AND 'HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF t EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND S ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVI_R NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE I DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE ! NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.• I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE,THAT I HAVEREADTHIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO, COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE -WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. O\tG/%8f I DATE ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE It ` f :3I FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE W VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADS# INSPECTION BOND RE 'D POSTED ❑YES NO g SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXE PT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWEp PROPOSE j / EXP 6 D/ LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR O z PARKING REQ'D PROVIDED LOT AREA ATP f dJ _ ( Pp1 NING REYYII��WWE�j B CD/AT rt z g a REMARKS f CHECKED BY (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA REQUIRED ❑ YES REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/ IBC109 / VALUATION Description Plan Check Building Permit Plumbing Mechanical Grading Engr. Review Engr. Inspection Fire Review Fire Inspection Landscape Insp. Recording Fee CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) 1 771-0220 GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD FINAL INSPECTIONREO'D 9 m FEE Description FEE State Surcharge 0 City Surcharge Base Fee Plan Chk. Deposit Receipt # .� L Total Amt. Due Receipt #� / L APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. ATTENTION' EXT 1333 n(,/ ` IT IS UNLAWFULTO USE OR OCCUPYABUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTILAFINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE ANDAPPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/IBC110/IRC110. os/os PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES BY ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR . ... ATE RECEIVED", I,N'rr �� r PERMIT EXPIRE . 1) . CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE% r PERMIT (�(� �� NUMBER OIJIJ j\ '' V1 q2--- CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESSj� I ;, '. ' J r( OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ IZ�IFr,\ a ; �� W MAILING ADDRESS C QC] , i " 1 T•• PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street Use Permit Req'd Inspecdon Required CITY ZIP TELEPHONE p', 2 �'�� REQUIRED DEDICATION F7^dBfQf01^d Sidewalk Required 0 C..� 4,040 �C ` `� J �J Wiring required O NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ O W �u C ADDRESS REMARKS = OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE a ¢tJ Q Q� UG W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE c NAME CBL # ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DAT ADDRESS FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE w OCITY ZIP TELEPHONE � U STATE LICENSE NUMBEREXPIRATIO DATE HECKED Y VARIANCE OR Cu SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION RE 'D BOND POSTED ,INSPECTION NO ( SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED a PROPER AX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. Q 0 11 Z -- 3, O, EXP \ 5 NEW XRESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr..) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR c7 ❑❑ ❑COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION COMMERCIAL z z CHANGE OF USE PARKING ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY PL SIGN REQ'D PROVIDED LOT AREA P' NING REVIEW Y DATE ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING ❑ FENCE REMARKS CYDS ( X FT) ❑ DEMOLISH - ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER RETAINING WALL ❑ RE ER ❑ CARRPORT ❑ _ O R CKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OP ACTIVITY) qPLAIN. CHECKED BY TYPE C'O ST U 10 OCCUPANT U f GROUP OF NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS CRITICAL AREAS] NUMBER y/ / GNUMBER OSTORIES SPECIAL INSPECTION AREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/ IBC109/ IRC109 FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 1 C'S Pet - C-E L A 1. C; �— r VALUATION Description FEE Description FEE . Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical THIS PERMITAUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMITCOVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN Grading, 7 (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE 1= SEPARATE PERMISSION. Q Engr. Review Iu PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS d PERMIT UMR: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr, Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION U) 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF M EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ( f ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER 06) NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE Landscape Insp. OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Total Amt. Due NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Recording Fee Receipt # HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION rGIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL E OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the ON; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Isacknowl god in space provided. ORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. (425) r OFF'VIALIGNATURE ! DAftSIGNALUR WNER OR AGENT) DATE9S7`�A' y IT Z Vz? -- Jo 10, . L _ ! 771 -0220 R D BY DATE' ATVENTION M 1333 IT IS UNLAWFULTO USE OR OCCUPYABUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTILAFINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL ORA CERTIFICATE OF OCCU- PANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/IBC110/IRC110. ORIGINAL -FILE • YELLOW -INSPECTOR PINK -OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR 09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES RECEIVED JUL 2 %2004 STREET FIB. G"TR � f � TRACKING NO. 5-03-155 REVI%ION DATE: JAN. q, 2004 PUGET EDMOND15 JAN. 26, 2004 SOUND IN 'IT MARCH 16, 2Lb9 PARK PREL I M I NAR `aH0RT�TJ6DTV1� 16td-- 1O, IN GITY 0 EDM0ND'), WA`)HINGTON 0 5 25 , T VNSH I P 2 7 NORTH , RANGE 3 EAST , M. a L' h,10(01 5 1060"1 WOODWAY b 2 OTH %7. q. JNINNd'� 8.03AoUd PEW�OT 229TH 'IT. 5W � � EDK 0NI)c R 7L 3-0g6104 132 76 17 w 'ITSW ^ v xWvl>•v _ EGEI� A� ra ® EN[Ri[�4fN VICINITY MAP PnD AtlN N csx ,®wam D .va \ 96 s vNrAa. avert Irr rec.°e e 13 1 ( S' NOTE% -m ® IOWR TrtAnNLWAI f �' `x7 F) ) 9 B Ut4rtH PfD/OR C:AtOVE#EM91Ht11 MAT E%15T u°exaRaro qt I.�,x { \ \ ARE NOT \"KE, MY tOl bE MtlWN LN ti19 IAO/ > y � �Ap'e v'Yrt � � # \ 1 � +t z, TI«, rvareirrr ca+rArw, r.<w m n. a oronccez. ® \1J I VERTICAL DATUM: A-/1AC-() a TEI.EfWW MER Q «.o PPOPGSED 9FP-�/ n Y.f wJ o- UT"' I" .....�....� ( n .�i V BENCFMtARK ® • E- rAx. Anlc.cW O Oa' � Q TL 3-Oqq 1060 ' Q �� HELD ASSLUED ELEVATION OF 500.00 FEET ON TOP ® WATer .e*ee I CJ �- OF OF SECTION 25-27 �N LA%ED AT yOUTFi�GEyT LOR. 12 Pee Hvovur 4 T s aTi R'aa..ie � 0 ,i il.w � 'ATE BENLFd.AI+RK c N WATee vm,ve I :'. ,,, (J-{ r..wn Q? SET SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF UTILITY POLE/-„� 0 MeL pa v \ ` -S _ rc v.a revura• 30' %OUTH OF g0071$AST PROPERTY CORNER. p u7w cAew N ..e,.. BAyi% OF BEARItJG: PLAT OF WE%TGATE ESTATE%, VOL. 20, s L 1 p ~ Q Q ?/G t 2€ I iTi PLAT BEARING OF N A Oq' 52'E n� _.,y_ aANTAP. xvER a.c I o Iw U BETWEEN MONUMENTS FM. ALG. I O6TH AVE. W. Ay DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION _ T Tamar emNr wRR ® O xe v. a.,vv ue r� (A OTAL LAM AREA : 40,485 SO. FT , I . q) AL .) v _ N REA OF ROADWAY: 3,3611 SO.FT.� 5,752 SO.FT.tEA%EI —A T r c - .lore vn.n. rarrt Aan 1 0 OTAL ROAD LENGTH: 150 L I N. FEET _. Nam, a�FiaEFr, I Or•ea.r N y Z� NET DEVELOPMENT AREA: 36, 021 yO. FT.(0.83 AL.) _ aaoo •elate °"� #' ..,m 'q FT PERCENT RD. TO TD?AL2AREA: 1 )% V nvE"W r°WERM z ®" tr v fJ EXISTING ZONING'; R-12 Z 1 H _ �Yvne+ � PROPC><3ED ZONING: R-IZ 111111A11 ,A r `^ POWER SUPPLY: 'A\0VMISH COUNTY P.U.D. NO I O A$ ej5iq TL 3-100 V'� CA WATER SUPPLY: CITY OF EOMOrIDy LfS ArA !!c O Q, a +� x y ` q,.A EWER SERVICE : OLY'MP I L VIEW WATER/yEWER D I ST . 3jLr • ¢ Z 10605 0 C Ro%% DEv DEN7I TY: 3.23 D.U.'S/ACRE n , 03 � � T OEV. DENSITY: 3.61 D U. 'S /ACRE _ 0 �_ y VERAGE LOT SIZE: 13,4g4 S0. F7,(GRO%y) p% i•- O g C4 O lE%T LOT %IZE: 10, 65t S0. FT. ,(1� t � OF UNIT% PROPOyED: 3 S: N N OTAL AREA OPEN yPACE1 -0- 1072 7 y llt, rM N % TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE : -0- �_ v .A, Tor x %CHOOL DISTRICT: EOMNDy NO. Lu FIRE DIyTRICT: lyFi COUNTY DIyT. N0. -7 76 rb g2 PkOPOSED LAM USE' 51N6LE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ---+d— - —�� (DETACHED) +✓e>vt A w,W a LEGAL DESCR I PT I ON TH TREE TFE EAST HALF OF TFE SOUTH HALF OF 71-E NIORTHYE T � vv va, xy ,yra QUARTER OF THE 50U71- E T QUARTER OF THE 50UTAR 57T QUARTER OF NGTION 29TG I PNG 7RAE 3 + :....._ : EAST. I Y, J EXCEPT TF¢ EAST 19O FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 65 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT TFE SOUTH ZO FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. # 1 O70(5 ( 1 062-i APPLICANT: SERENA CONSTRUCTION CO. LA.- z$ 51 TUATE IN THECO{Ji•ITY OF %N7H0A115H, STATE OF V49HINGTCN. V 7003 117TH PLACE NE ® 22604 �- KIRKLAW, WA%H. g6053 �Z� NOTES: 929-991.1334 1— ' I. ALL %LOPE% Ij4RE LE55 THAN SURVpvOR: %UM,41T yURVEYIWa, INC PRJPER7. ADORE%%: 10611 226TH %TREET %.W. �9 LLJ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JA" T. WALKER 15z ) 12l.O6 62W AVE. NE EOWONO-j, WA19HINGTON gb Q > P.O. BOX 1542 2. THERE ARE NNCCDD CRITICAL AR A; KIPKLANO 1►A%H, g6039 TAX ALC7. NO. 270325-003-102-00 — Q OWALL, WA%H. g601q He. %ALE:r • 20' A% DEFINED Y EMG 425-614-C967 425-786-6326 1667 S. hI7E 1% LOCATED IN71DE PLANNER: LAND PLAWNG NORTHM1WMT ARCHITECT: NASH JONE% AWER%ON EX15T ING UGA M"ARY (EDMOW5) ENGINEER: TFE JAY GROUP INC. LARRY D. DEI°!-ER OWrER. %E EW+ CONSTRUCTION CO., L.L.G. ZO O 20 �0 7003 117TH PLACE NE 11699 NE 80TH %TREET 4. ryp DUPLEXES Pr- m . Ig27 9TH STREET 1529 TENTH %TREET KIRKLAND \pA%H- W6 3 CO TIOUR5:1 IT. INT[RVAL- 5. -0 GAR GA GE%DOFF-%TREET PARKING IAAZY 9I LE A +I. g627 MARv%VILLE, WASH. 96270 K11S1CLMA. WASH. g6033 429-626-Ig 16 1 1 F T� GAR MIN. PER LOT. ( 5 g-I 0 425-531v 1554 C:ID6oumants and SaMIngsL4dmWn/sftkw% askWPV-and Phenn1np%1667 - Pardhan - EdmondatEDMNEWERQxd -- 07a7/2004 — 01:47 PM -- Scale 1 : 754.51 ;DATE RECEIVED n-1--olv 7 [PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS zoNE - L PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB ADDRESS / c/��. f�j 1E7 SUIT /APT# .. OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS y? y UL�. P O�' ^ PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO: ¢ MAILING ADDRESS M7 �� LID FEE $ C /� -- I �? L A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP Rw ce Approved `-� , V t RW Permit Requlrad. Street Use Permit Req'd CITY TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required y / Sidewalk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground Wiring required NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF IXTURES PRV REQUIRED t, r 3 �1 l ( ��Q YES NO ❑ Q uw ADDRESS }v� REMARKS _ • (! % OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE �D_ CITY ZIP \ TELEPHONE 0j S 00 � NAME CBL# I' y lil�C e3 (/__Id -Y Vf NEERING REVIEWED BY DATE O ADDRESS f� FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE ul CITY ZIP TELEPHONE STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE C ECKED 8 VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND t� REQ'D POSTED ►. .t� �. [�. % C) 4. ! L a ❑YES // 640 $ SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT a PROPERTY TAX ACCCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EX�E,[MPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED EXP NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR t7 5 ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR � 8'. rj �s 1 1 1 t �C I f ^414g 1 Z ❑ ❑ ❑ CHANGE OF USE 1 -/ ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN, REO'D ARKP OVIDED ! ` AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY ATE ^ 7 i /f / g ❑ REPAIR GRADING ❑ FENCE �T r'TQD �I:q�► C ;,r ( X FT) !MKS, �`�yYai OTHER ~ ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER = CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY ❑ FIRE ALARM O (TYPE OF US , BUSINESS OR ACT ITY) EXP IN: CHECKED' BY TYPE F C NSTRUCTION 1CODE OCCUPANT I GROUP NUMBER NO OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS63 SPECIAL INSPECTION AREA OCCUPANT OSTORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED ❑YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D . 9 VALUATION 9 Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % " Building Permit' City Surcharge rLANCHECK NO: 6q- (9 & f VESTED DATE Plumbing 16 Base Fee Mechanical p 2 THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO I_ BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN 4CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading t SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # 19 ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. DUe .?. = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." Recording Fee Receipt # ON GIVEN HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE CORRECT. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE TDU Y AUTHORIZED ION; THAT THE. FAGENTIOF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK.AUTHORIZED' THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy; and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged Inspece'provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OF IA IQNA DAT SIGN UR WNER AGENT) DATE S GNED t I (425) 771 -OL2O SE Y DA E A ENTION M 1333 ' IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND. APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR os/os PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES. PLANNING DATA NAME , s DATE: s O SITE ADDRESS: T:H ac, .. PLAN CHK#CX4— O (D,-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED? / No MAP PAGE: CORNER LOT: es o FLAG LOT: aemsl o ZONING: g!�2-12 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: 1 ❑ Studv Reauired: Waiver ❑ Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) Exempt SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: , Street: 'Left Side: / a ' Right Side:10 Rear: Actual Setbacks: Street: 1 ;qn, Left Side: ^ (415' Right Side: 10 • cc;_ ear: `�jC) Street map checked for additional setback required? Yes I No NA ❑ DETACHED STRUCTURES: /,,, Cjl 14 , CD ❑ ROCKERIES: I . ❑�FS/TRELLISES:INDOWS /PROJECTING MODULATION: !� �(3 , ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: PARKING: Required: _,=_Actual:-2t -2— LOT AREA: _ /-1 O � L.4j/� LOT COVERAGE Calculations: a-R, A -4- —1 1L4 S 8 3 BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point:C'Datum Elevations I LI.8 ( 1 Maximum Allowed: -i- Actual Height: A.D.U. CREATED . Yes N LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: es / o Plan Review By: NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC Critical Areas Checklist � CA File No: 143 Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 1 n to 4-h -4-' . S V%D IF 0 IyA N n5 Qr,t d 2. Property Tax Account Number: 'Z-7 07"2- C;,=�s 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):�T . n„��_ 4.. Is this site currently.developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? � S 1 t3G C. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. _ Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 0 : Approx. Depth: - 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: N) C) ; Approx. Depth: — What season(s) of the year? — 8. Site is in the floodway V`3 0 floodplain ni O of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? ri 0 Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? — ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed ?X ; urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: cvl For City Staff Use Only 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? 2. Site is Zoned? lZ 15 — ) Z 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? V rLg-- i T r�2 a,y ✓ i_ �,a,,,n j nta , -v O — g % -- 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? 1, . o . 5. Site ��w�,ith, within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? ri- ,,,.,., ,► 1�, ,, es, ,, Aci v, it�y6b '�C4:Y�cL .Ja D t=n-J . sew a d c:✓� d DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by:.; _� n}1e Q Q Date: Wn— 1'1—r4zNA Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003 • • City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff tc determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: Y— &Z6 - o/ DO 3 City Receipt #: d?a Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT V DATE X; `2.fV W Property Owner's Authorizations lJ By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and po ting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER X DATE 1 Z b I D PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: Name -To o: i 1 "7 --h P 1, Street Address City State Zip Telephone: it 'L,6 —ram 3 3 4 Email address (optional): Applicant Representative: LaMVUy Z�> DEIZ-S WE R Name 1 0 223 -T Street Address Rb City State Zip Telephone: Lk2c-;^ 3"Y'J — 2- Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003 8go-i9y a i h City of Ed-tionc� RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION u PERMIT Permit Number e7:� Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Con B. Type of Work (be specific); O O C. Contractor. 4-Y /�k��'D4_s;7—G Mailing Address: % E—i)wi-y",P1 State License 1t: Liability Insurance: D. Building Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family INSPECTOR: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): ❑ City Project 'Vf Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, ❑ Other F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : FYes ❑No G. Size of Cut: APPLICANT TO READ All x SIGN 00. INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds har'mless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. . All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the 09ve statements and understand the permit requirements and thepink copy of the permit will be available on si a c t all Ames fo4 i4sp �Wn purposes. =IDIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGII PRIOR41O PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram; (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ❑ NO 9 w,� o i Wrrnw,ef;�. ©�YM� tl�w W� /ceW� to hv& g& Fle • Jar �; ICJ I Orc';05-- aZ6-1`1 i( City of Edmonds Permit No: o(LA--4—V1 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: A. -Address or Vicinity of Construction: I ou a S4 B. Type of Work (be specific): C. Contractor: Mailing Address: I (-I' v State License #:&�C-NCLUU�7-d- City Business License #: 160 b I D. Building Permit # (if applicable): . 201- 157 Contact: Phone: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, COMCAST, OVWSD) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: h& er6 N kV I L AA' N M N S F. PAVEMENT CUT: [-]YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO G. ❑ Mail Approved Permit ❑ Call for Pickup APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City_of Edmonds or any of its departments or emplovees, including but not limited to the defense of anv legal proceedings including defense costs and attornev fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING.THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. \ ♦ Traffic control�and,public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-500-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST M KE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature:&x)0p&=A Date: 'i o (Cnntrartnr n -Au nt) 0'CITVtJSE"ONLV • i i Time Authorized:, I I; 1 ol ld Special Conditions: 0 &JS'Tr4_UC-r Ag�e fiWAu" I inspection Fee: Total Fee*-. �/ i_ �' /� . t� 1_ i_ ..rir�... .J dl [;� � ,� 1Ls .. �.�� %��_�■ r,��/L�.�� � A/ji .w` � / rowiMllli>G.�' r'11 Ili iir�_ • �RZI�'�/ li�I REQUIRED Call 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 for a 24-hour voice -recorded inspection request line. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: DATE: 2 4 CADocuments and Settings\CurtisNy Documents\Fortes\Engnmg\ROWpertnit_.doc Revised 10/01/03 ROUTING Fob TU: Lz.l. a Date 2. 3. 4. S. Message: 0 To i 1/z .S/ S +�% f�� . wtJ' �,ryf �.;Y �/ �.LS- f��." rV.•] c� iL� } From: Date: E-7-72 �"'��.. 0/7 INT-a4-OFFICE, COMM VNICAfl4NS DATE TO FORM 41 - LITTLE'S SUBJECT: V- FROM CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Date June 28. 1974 Address of Property to be Connected. 10611 226th Street S.W. William Sisom Owner Name & Mailing Address Same as above Legal Description: Needed for sewer connection to be figured Recommendation: Required to connect per 200 foot regulation. House is not below sewer elevation. Recommend sending letter to owner 1%after our field check',informing him that he is required to connect to sewer and to bring legal description to Engineering for com- putation of connection charge. We also recommend a 60-day time extension. LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. EDMONDS CITY ENGINEER City Engineer EnRr. 6/14/74 0 0 0 0 auk . ciR r CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Date �V 7 Address of Property to be Connected- 16 (v // - 22G .5 (/ r.1i . Owner Name & Mailing Address _ WILL I *N S I SC H 11S*H fir, Legal Description: Recommendation: NhZ � PL'x ADO , "CvGA-7r10 �. COj �ovs� / r NorSarno �Il�oa.N► RIO 4 out cwere �QEGp y/�167�� .SAD ��►/! Go'Yrdz c 75 �J � ����/G Fob Co��� r�y�i�/ o� Co��✓. c�cc�. Au o if GOMrl69e10 �D Di/'1� E,�!✓f /s �t,% . Engr. 6/14/74 ,IA990 r ` • 27 ••2'7/ Y�i r {'• Lit ?7G7►�5 u y /�1A•,� i/�tl�"�Ll � /OS/S 2ZG'u Nvagels /�L49 Za6'H o KE 1/ZIP — /OGo)-22G�� � /06o t- Z2G rN x, 50 I I sa ,f r � r � � S - 3 ► - So A-4 A9e-z,=v- P� aP. o v Se 2 Z. s O l-- m o ry p. NEVU S C--Zp r-i C TA tux.. & 7"" S W cD v i-mb M i o i r F2, i C. uf n/ o. 4 7 i i r }� lo, UT/lliy ESmT. i aoupeT omQ,Lx-le d E � 1 s,l srom • � � N n T' r o Go AvA/EeT 1 f y G) C— Sm T A/a- i ►!v TNov-r, f r—rt-orvr 7� N i07"� = E f' F l rri J-. F11 _ E S 4 G. �=ol` co r:G�En tio.93/73 ; r -3.7¢ I a,t�: y, •tit ' , r a � � �i `• r� `X: � I '1 a RECEIVED JUC 1974 r } 1/1 4 '�1� 10' UTILIT`I ESMr. ,.>.; ; ,' �'' .; •L PLC' 2 Go��T OR,c�ER A .v' ^* , J �Y tuo. ga»3 :.7: O AIlnl&r:,ri O J { 1. ►fie i r 1-4 o o r P- a f:_ M o. 9 3/ 73 a • rI December 17, 1976 MO TO: Public Works Sewer Department FROM: Leif R. Larson City Engineer SUBJECT RFNAININC .SEIVER CONNECTIONS MTERRED TO TT-T ENGINEERING DEPT. We have examined the 19'remaining sewer connections referred to this department, and have the following recommendations to:make: 1) 213 Elm Street (Dimmick) Me existing residence is too loi,r to reach the sewer in Elm Street, and it would be.difficult-to constrict a sewer to Second Avenue. It is' recommended that a waiver be granted subject to proper fumctioning of the septic system, pending the development of property adjoining Second Avenue, wherein a combined sewer arrangement would all.oi,•r this residence to make connection. 2) 931 Plain. Street (nelson) This property can connect to the sanitarnr sewer, however, the soil conditions adjacent to the sewer lateral at Main Street indicate potential problems with the sewer hoof up. A waiver is recomrended subject to the proper functioning of the septic system, and subject to connecting to sewer if future development of the property or plumbing additions occur. 3) 806 Ninth Avenue.South (Yeager) This property does not have gravity sewers available and would hest be served through an L.I.D. with gravity sewers to Eighth Avenue. 4) 716 Ninth Avenue South . (Mirdock) This property is not served by sanitary sewer. It'is recommended that an..L.I.D. be formed with gravity sewers flowing to Eighth Avenue. 5) 929 Carr Road (Strickland.) More exists a problem related to utility easements and the estate settlement of business prior to mr.. Strickland's death. It is recommended that a waiver be granted subject to completion of the utility easement, proper functioning of the septic system, and,no further development of the property until sewer hookups are provided. PIemo to: ilic VIA Sewer Department . • . • Page 2 12/17/76 (continued) 6). 650.2 170tin Street. S.1d: (Ayres This property is adjacent to the Lynnwood.tnink sewer, however, no lateral exists in Olympic View Drive. The owners have had some difficulty in arranging for. the lateral extension in the street right-of-way. It is recommended that the City recniest them to contact three contractors and provide evidence of the contractor's estimate or refusal. to accompl.isb the work proposed. Should that ,evidence indicate the unavailability of a con- tractor to do the work, it is recoTmiended that the City proceed with a. lateral connection, charging the resident for the actual. cost of work. (See next connection.) 7) .6SlO 170th Street S.IV. (Upthegrove) This residence adjoins the Avres residence,. and could joi.ntl.y use a sewer lateral. The ;recommendation for #6 applies to this residence. 8) 18596 76th Avenue West (Cline Scuba Shop) A lateral was not installed to this particular property imder.the 76th Avenue street project. -Later, the City installed a lateral from the north but inadvertently constricted the lateral on private property. Attempts have been made to acquire an easement without results. Tllis matter needs further study in acquiring an easement from either the owner to the north or south:to gain sewer service without removing street or walk .improvements. It is recommended that a waiver be granted until the City. can provide a sewer connection point. 9) 20216 76th Avenue (Jest (19elcli) This property is not served with a sewer lateral. in 76th Avenue.. This sewer connection will require an .easement over adjoining property to connect to sewers to the west. Further study is re(iuired on this easement made by the City. It is recommended that a waiver be granted subject to the City arranging for a sewer connection point. 10) City Park (T'hird and Pine) The present restroom is more than 200 ft. :from the sewer and. is below the sewer elevation. It is 'recommended.that a ilai.ver be granted subject to proper functioning of the septic system.. Also, any Ichznnges to the pli nb- ing which would expand the use (or should other regul.ati.ons outside the City apply), a pump sliould be installed and connection made to the trunk - sewer running. through the Park playfield. 11) lOS21 226th Street S.N. (Jarvis) This property is located in the vicinity of 0l.ympic View Plater Dist. sewers. However, the property does not directly abut the sewer or have. access to the connection point. It is recommended. that this property. participate in an L.I.D. with the surrounding neighbors for compl.etion of the hookup. Memo to: Plic*1VOO Sewer Dep, art � • Page 3 12/17/76 (continued) ..12) 10605 226th.Street S.11. (.Johnston) 13) 10607.;226th Street.S.IV, (Kemp) 14) 10611 226th Street S.W. (Sisom) 15) 10727 226th Street S.11. (Jatho) Recommendation for Item 1.1 will apply to the .above locations. 16) 718 Ninth Avenue South . This property is not served by sanitary sewer. It is recommended . that an L.I.D. .be .formed with gravity sewers flowing to P,i.ghth Avenue. 17) 528 Eighth Avenue North (Schroeder) This property does not abut a sanitary sewer. It is recommended that this property be included in an L.I.D. to serve surrounding proper- ties.- 18) 202.22 76th Avenue North (00onald Log Cabin) This. property is in the process of receiving a City approved subdi- vision for duplexes, acid plans for removal of the existing log house. It is recommended that a waiver he granted on the existing house.' 'Any new construction will thenfollow the Subdivision and.Bui.lding codes requiring ]lookup. 19) 7400 212th Street S.W. (Kenmore Pre-Itix.) With low usage rate and extent of lot size, ,it is recommended that a waiver be granted.1f the property should. be. developed beyond its, present usage, a.sewer connection would be required. 1 e, t j I1Wlsc CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works February 13, 1976 CERTIFIED MAIL *t1/0675/ Mr. or Mrs. William Sisom 10611 - 226th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. or Mrs. Sisom: You were previously sent a letter dated July 11, 1974, which re- quired the sanitary sewer connection of your property located at 10611 226th Street S.W. As of this date, our records still indicate that your property is unconnected. You are hereby instructed to make the necessary sewer connection within sixty (60) days from the date of this letter. If the connection is not completed within this time, water service to the subject property will be terminated as outlined in City Code 11.16.240. Requirements for obtaining a Side -Sewer Permit are a plot -plan drawing of the proposed connection, the legal description for the prop- erty, payment of connection fees and copies of all recorded easements (where applicable), and payment of the $35 Permit fee. Side -Sewer Permits may be obtained at the Public Works Department, 200 Dayton Street, Edmonds, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Please phone Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superin- endent, at 775-2525, Extension 226, for any information or assistance you may 'desire. Sincerely, SIGNED J. HERB GILBO Director JBM:jt t--f d RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30s (plus_postage) SENT TO FPO t. Mr, or Mrs. William Sisom n.oR'bAtE�,, STREET AND N0. 10611 - 226th Street S.W. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE n Edmonds. Washington 98020 RETURN t. Shows to whom and date delivered ............ 1! RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only ............ 6! SERVICES 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 3! With delivery to addressee only ............ 8! DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 51 q... SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee re wired) PS................ Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 4 (See other side) d CPO: I970O-sG7-4sa CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works July 11, 1974 Mr. William Sisom 10611 - 226th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Sewer Connection for the Property Located at 10611 - 226th Street S.W., Edmonds Dear Mr. Sisom: The matter of your sewer connection for the above subject property has been investigated by the City Engineering Department, and a conclusion has been formulated. Your property is within 200 feet of the City sewer main and is not below the sewer main elevation. Therefore, the City of Edmonds will still require connection of your property to the City sanitary sewer system. Since the July 1, 1974, deadline date for connection has expired, you will need an extension of time in order to have the connection completed. Before an extension can be granted, you must obtain a Side -Sewer Permit. To obtain the Permit, you must furnish our office with the property legal description, a plot -plan drawing of the work to be performed, and the Connection Fee; which is calculated by the Engineering Department. It is requested that you contact the Public Works Department regarding this required sewer connection by July 18, 1974. If you have any questions, or need further assistance; please contact Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superintendent, at 775-2525, extension 226. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS 0 J. HERB GILBO Director JBM:te • • REGARDING: address RECORD OF CONTACTS DATE:. NAME, PHONE NO., & .t ADDRESS of CALLER COMMENTS a7-0 �ne�iy 3 ACTION TAKEN Initials -7�!- CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street - Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. or Mrs. William Sisom 10611 226th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Sewer Connection for Property Located at 10611 226th Street S.W., Edmonds Dear Mr. or Mrs. Sisom: The matter of your sewer connection for the above refer- enced property has been investigated by the Engineering and Water/Sewer Divisions of the Public Works Department. Since the property does not directly abut the City sanitary sewer main, it is recommended that you petition for a Local Improve- ment District (L.I.D.) with the surrounding -neighbors. There- fore, a petition and sketch illustrating the area to be sewered is enclosed. For information related to the petition for this L.I.D., please contact Mr. Richard Allen, Assistant City Engineer, at 775-2525, extension 220. Sincerely, LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works jt Enclosure REGARDING: 10611 - 226th Street S.W. (address) R E C O R D O F C O N T A C T S NAME PHONE Mn $ DATE ADDRESS of CALLER COr9�iTS 5/1/74 William Sisom Certified Letter No. 406387 sent - requiring hook-up within 60 days. 6/12/74 1 acre tract - house is over 200' from sewer main. 7/2/74 Received recommendation from Engr. stating connection required. Need legal description to calculate connection fee. '�'7/11/74 Letter sent stating connection is required. Requiring response by July 18. 2/13/76 Certified Letter No. 406751 sent requiring hook-up within 60 days �.; per previous letter. ACTION TAKEN Letter received. Referred to Engr. Letter received. INITIALS TE TE TE FIR JT "A Good Customer Is Worthy of Every Consideration" i WESTERN UTILITIES SUPPLY CO. G_ Waterworks & Sewerage Supplies G� P.O. Box 3524 5409 OHIO AVE*. SO. SEATTLE, WASH.98124 762-7025 SEATTLE, WASH. 98134 it 1, _ � .�, d it J � E �j •� � CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Date June 28, 1974 Address of Property to be Connected. 10611 226th Street S.W. William Sisom Owner Name 6 Mailing Address Same as above Legal Description: Needed for sewer connection to be figured Recommendation: Required to connect per 200 foot regulation. House is not below sewer elevation. Recommend sending letter to owner "fter our field check,informing him that he is required to connect to sewer and to bring legal description to Engineering for com- putation of connection charge. We also recommend a 60-day time extension. C1 I City ngineer j RECEIVED nl,� JUL 2 1974 Enpr. 6/14/74 W-703 ZZ 6'=' 5v-s J INFILTRATION EVALUATION LETTER 10611 - 2261,11 St. SW EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PREPARED FOR SERENA CONSTRUCTION LLC N 17311 — 135" Avenue NE. A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 • (425) Fax 481-2510 September 23, 2003 Mr. irfan Pardhn Serena Construction 7003 —117'u Place NE Kirkland, Washington 98033 NELSON GEOTECHNIC,AL l4i;SSOCiATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Infiltration Evaluation Letter 10611-22610 Street SW Edmonds, Washington NGA File No. 379703 Dear Mr. Pardhn: Snohomish County (425) 337-1669 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 This letter presents the results of our infiltration study at your planned 3-lot. short plat development in Edmonds, Washington. INTRODUCTION The site is located at 10611-2260' Street SW in Edmonds as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. We understand that an existing single-family residence will be removed from the site. Three new residential lots and associated paving and utilities are planned for the site. A stormwater infiltration facility is also planned for this project. Mr. Larry Deisher of Land Planning Northwest requested that we visit the site to cxplorc the subsurface soils and hydrologic conditions in two test pit excavations, provide an analysis of the infiltration capabilities of the on -site soils and provide a design infiltration rate as well as recommendations for infiltration system installation. For our use in preparing this report, Mr. Deisher has provided a faxed copy of an undated site plan titled "Serena Construction, Preliminary Short Subdivision in City of Edmonds," and an electronic file prepared by Summit Surveying titled "A Topographic Survey of 10611 — 2260 St. SW for Serena Construction Infiltration Evaluation Letter 10611-226" Street SW September 23, 2003 NGA File No. 379703 Page 2 LLC," Dated June 2003 The site plan shows the planned lots and an access road from 226'" Street. The Precise location of the planned infiltration system had not been established at the time that this letter was prepared. SCOPE Based on our conversations with you and our understanding of the project, the services provided by NGA include the following: Review available soils and geologic neaps of the area. 2. Explore the site subsurface soil and ground water conditions with backhoe excavated test pits. Our client provided the backhoe. 3. Perform grain -size analyses on, selected soil samples in the proposed infiltration areas. 4. Provide preliminary estimates of the infiltration capacity of the soils based on the 1992 Washington State DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington- S. Provide recommendations for infiltration system installation. 6. Prepare a written geotechnical letter to document our findings, conclusions and recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The site is a nearly flat roughly rectangular parcel covering about an acre, as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The site is bordered to the north and west by residential properties, to the east by a private road, and to the south by 226"' Street SW. The site is vegetated with mature evergreen trees and underbrush in the south and northwest. A gravel driveway curves around the southwest quadrant of the site and provides access from 226' Street SW and from the private road east of the site. The existing residence is located in the northeast portion of the site . and is surrounded by a lawn area. We did not observe surface water on the site at the time of our visit. Subsurface Conditions Geology: The geologic units for this area are shown on the Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington, by James P. Minard (USGS, 1983). The site is mapped NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Infiltration Evaluation Letter 10611-226" Street SW Septemibcr 23, 2003 NGA File No. 379703 Page 3 as advance outwash (Qva), which is described as well -bedded gravelly sand, and fine-grained sand, generally firm, and unoxidized, deposited by proglacial streams and in progrlacial lakes. Our test pit explorations encountered clean sand with gravel consistent with the description of the advance outwash. Explorations: The subsurface conditions at the site were explored on September 15, 2003, by excavating two test pits to depths of 9.2.to 9.8 feet {below the existing surfacc using a backhoe. The approximate locations of the test pits arc shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. An NGA engineer was present during the explorations, examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, obtained samples of the different soil types, and maintained logs of the test pits. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, presented in Figure 3. The logs of our test pits are attached to this report and are presented as Figure 4. We present'a brief summary of the subsurface conditions in the following paragraph. For a detailed description of the subsurface conditions, the test pits logs should be reviewed. At the surface both test pits encountered about 0.8 feet of duff and topsoil. Below the duff and topsoil, and extending approximately two feet below the surface, the test pits exposed medium dense. silty sand with gravel interpreted as weathered outwash. Underlying the weathered horizon the explorations exposed fine to coarse sand with gravel and trace silt and cobbles extending to the depths explored. This clean sand and gravel was interpreted as advance outwash. Hydrologic Conditions Ground water seepage was not encountered in our test pit explorations. We did not note indications of a seasonal high water table within the depths explored in our test pits. LABORATORY ANALYSIS We performed four grain -size analyses on soil samples obtained from the clean sand and gravel at depths of 4.5 to 9.5 feet below the surface. The results of the sieve analysis are presented as Figures 5 through 8. The analysis indicated that the site soils at depth consist of.fne to coarse sand with gravel and trace silt and cobbles. (NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Infiltration Evaluation.Letter 10611-226'' Street SW September 23, 2003 NGA File No. 379703 Page 4 STORMWATER INFILTRATION Our explorations encountered duff, topsoil, and weathered silty sand extending to about two feet below the surface. Underlying the weathered horizon, clean sand with gravel was exposed. This clean sand and gravel should be suitable for stormwater infiltration. A 5-foot separation should be maintained between the bottom of the infiltration systems and seasonal high groundwater elevations and/or impervious horizons. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, it appears that this separation should be achieved with infiltration trenches up to five feet deep. The planned inf ltration system should perform adequately, provided that clean sand and gravel materials are exposed at the bottom of the infiltration trench excavations. We completed four laboratory gradation tests on soil samples obtained from TP-I and TP-2 for the purpose of assigning design infiltration rates. We used the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) soil group classification (Figure III-3.1) as presented in the "Storm Water Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin," (Ecology 1992) to classify the soil samples analyzed. We referred to "Table III-3.1 Soil Properties Classified by Soil Texture," from this manual to evaluate the soil samples from our explorations. This table provides long-term design infiltration rates based on the soil gradation test results. Based on this manual and our sieve analyses, the samples from the planned infiltration area are classified as sand. An infiltration rate of 8.27 inches per hour could be used for design of an infiltration system terminated in this material. We recommend that the infiltration trench excavations be cleaned of any sloughing soil or debris prior to installing the infiltration system. We should be retained to observe the material exposed in the excavated infiltration trenches to confirm that the design infiltration rates are consistent with site conditions. USE OF THIS LETTER This letter has been provided for Serena Construction and their agents, for their use in planning and budgeting for the infiltration system on this project only. Our services included an evaluation of the infiltration capability of the site soils at selected locations only and should not be considered as an evaluation of the entire site. This letter may be used for bidding and estimating purposes, but our findings, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions-. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Infiltration Evaluation Letter 10611-226" Street SW September 23, 2003 NGA File No. 379703 Page 5 Within the limitations of. scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this letter was prepared. No other warranty, cxpressed or implied, is made.. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. qd- ,A--4j— Mike D. Rundquist Project Engineer �r �'--23,03 Khaled M. Shawish, PE Senior Engineer MDR:KMS:kmn Eight Figures Attached Two Copies Submitted (One Faxed Copy to Lang Diesber) NELSON GEO TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. I k lz T F - r zizra. L. t,. tt1TC0e8 4 Project i-^ A TDB,. � J�'r.ONQU18 '� � .Sll•• r "tj i �'"�. • <` :� !�� J �lsao IFV 4 , 1tOm- Al IOSW Q77LlDW . 1M0f1 . ,:3 r , +�• O1alaC q�E '♦ 4c ;� � 'J• �� t+ "t+'�s J M r S ' 2lQJp •i••• �+ .J' 4 VT VMr1l+iGll r I '���� ZwwYS•I'SY x r ,�L� J�� '� , .'..r►+.,p^�[, ; r MII .B .t; 2g'9iSF:,t �r'4dJ•I>k< ►i Qf :. ;•� e ��p t Wr1t `. ��+,.• �,;�,.� uJma fiwr.�,. a � ,\l�u. - �� � a�r1 _ a �t - }� 5 ♦� IfY'J L!lS1 1 Y4' r lafli�4 ,� ♦ � p14•r 'y [i'f ' - '• AY •ir :' - _^�C `" I ,� ... 1 a I6AI. •,=: .•_. Jt.. - .. � •.• ,:�� _1000 Tilomae Bios..Ms, Not to Scale PROJECT NUMBER 10611-220th St SW Ncl sorIi GEOTEctiNJCAL . No. Date Ralftlon sy CK 379703 NGA �.SSOCIATES, ING. I 2mwm 0r04w ACU M)F Edmonds, Washington GEOTECMNICALENGINEERS &GKMOGISTS FI um � mi n R 9 Y •n,.•� erl, 17f aq-nc1 w'; Vicinity Map Von _x„o �� C. C Metal House — Shed ;* ....... �....;.. , . s.. * � :. ice' i:''' .,....•h '.' �. . o� me Ia `--_— 20 It Wlde Drwevway E sement LOT 2 . House Ln `ate• ■�� _ __ C Ni LOT 3 e LOT 1 SS 1 — w w w -- w --:�� w— 226th S— t $� P & T T —P � w /� PdcT kTW p —+Pt T Reference; Site plan based on an electronic ftle prepared by Summit Surveying, titled "A Topographic n Survey of 10611- 226th St SW for Serena Construc tloni, LLC," dated June 2003, Y04+ (J'C rl9 4T D o �� v a 0 x `D r' Z c m. to c Cr 0 M CL a w o oho v "v 'p tea. g '" 3• PROJECT NUMBER 379703 Figure 2 r m m z v R~ • aaa•� � aaa" a �� � aas � Sao � I ' � .-,_)'- . :tii ,'., • �_ ■ms aft- • • awns s 0 aca� 0 a+oo e_ ■ �� • } Existing Private oad (T, • S � 1 �r r 10611-226th St SW NELSON CEOTECNNICAL Mo• Date Revision By CK �GA ASSOCIATES, �NC, WIV03 Original AOJ MDR Edmonds, Washington GEon'ECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GROLOGtgrg Site Plan • ,74;: a as K. 4-OW �: o„� ,„ t+el ..-Ia, ..,-mo UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP NAME SYMBOL CLEAN GW WELL -GRADED, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVEL GP _ GRAVEL POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAINED MORE THAN 50 °6 GRAVEL GM OF COARSE FRACTION SILTY GRAVEL SOILS RETAINED ON NO.4 SIEVE WITH FINES ' GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND CLEAN SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SM 0 SAND ' MORE THAN 50 % SP POORLY GRADED SAND RETAINED ON MORE THAN 50 % -- NO.200 SIEVE OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO.4 SIEVE SAND SM SILTY SAND WITH FINES: - SC. CLAYEY SAND FINE- SILT AND CLAY ML SILT INORGANIC, GRAINED LIQUID LIMIT CL CLAY LESS THAN 60 % SOILS ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT MORE THAN 50 % INORGANIC _ PASSES LIQUID LIMIT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FLAT CLAY NO.200 SIEVE 50 % OR MORE — ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: — 1) Field ciassiticatlon Is based on visual SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: examination of soil In general accordance wRh A - M D 2480-93. Dry - Absonoe of moieture, dusty, dry to the touch 2) SON classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D 2488-93. Moist - Damp, but no visible water. 6 U 3) Descripbona of coil density ar Wet - Visible free water or saturated, consistency are based on usually sob Is obialned from Interpretation of blowcount data, below water table visual appearance of sills, and/or test data. a PROJECT NUMBER 1061 1-226th St SW I!IELSOtd GEOTECHNICAC. No. Date Revision By t;p; 378703 t�IGA Assocjxms, It4c. ►OR r ADS Edmonds, Washington GHOTECliN1CA� ENGnHctoes & GEOf_OG�Tt3 a F Figure 3 Soil Classification DEPTH (FEET) TEST PIT ONE 0.0 - 0.8 0.8 - 2.0 2.0 - 9.2 TEST PIT TWO 0.0 - 0.8 0.8 - 2.2 2.2 - 8,0 8.0 - 9.6 MDR LOG OF EXPLORATION LISC SOIL DESCRIPTION DUFF AND TOPSOIL SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO DRY] (WEATHERED OUTWASH) SP GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND TRACE SILT AND COBBLES (DENSE. MOIST) (ADVANCE OUTWASH) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 7.0 AND 8.9 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SLIGHT TEST PIT CAVING WAS ENCOUNTERED BETWEEN 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.2 FEET ON 9/15/03 DUFF AND TOPSOIL SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO DRY) (WEATHERED OUTWASH) SP GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND TRACE SILT AND COBBLES (DENSE, MOIST) (ADVANCE OU'lWASH) SP GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE SILT AND GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (ADVANCE OUTWASH) : SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 4.5 AND 9.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED SLIGHT TEST PIT CAVING WAS ENCOUNTERED BETWEEN 0.0 TO 5.0 FEET TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.8 FEET ON 9/15103 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO 379703 FIGURE 4 m CL o fn J N N N S � O 7 Y �s Z s z �r W z 10 pox dui O O 34$ z P e m ,n 0 0 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE s '°. .� ry� tor' 91 81 0 7( W } 6( m K Z 5( LL t— Z 4( w a 3( 2( 1( 10DO 100 i 0 1.0 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.01 0.001 COBBLES GRAVEL �p SILT OR CLAY COARSE FINE OARS MEDIUM FINE U.S.C. EXPLORATION SYMBOL NUMBER • SP TP-1 SAMPLE SOIL DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION DISTRIBUTION Gravel = 43% 7.0 Feet Gray, ride to coarse sand with fine to coarse Sand = 56% gravel and trace sill Silt/Clay = % E H � 7 w 3 mE Z 5 a Z 4 w U IY wa 3 2 1 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE �p- a�'' moo' moo' .�• �4. so. 7U 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND NCRSE FINE OAR MEDIUM FINE SILT OR CLAY U.S.C. EXPLORATION SAMPLE SYMBOL NUMBER DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION SOIL DISTRIBUTION e SP TP-1 8.9 Feet Gray, fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse Gravel = 30% gravel and trace silt Sand = 69% Silt/Clay =1 % 0 0 W m W 0 � ` m 100 90 80 70 W m 60 OC z 50 W W 40 a 30 20 OEM 011111 1 1 1 II' 1000 100 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 'p- "p. 4)- �p' "o- �p- 10 1.0 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 0.01 0.001 GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY COARSE I FINE COARS MEDIUM FINE U.S.C. EXPLORATION SAMPLE SOIL SYMBOL NUMBER DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION DISTRIBUTION • SP TP-2 4.5 Feet Gray, fine to coarse sand with fine to ooarse Gravel = 47% gravel Sand = 953% Silt/Clay = 0% U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE m h° r° tQ 'p K rye' it 1- 70 LL7 m 60 z 50 u- E- uz 40 U ac a 30 20 10 0 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND COARSE I FINE JCOARSd MEDIUM I FINE 0.01 SILT OR CLAY 0.001 U.S.C. EXPLORATION SAMPLE SOIL SYMBOL. NUMBER DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION DISTRIBUTION • 3P TP-2 9.5 Feet Gray, fine to medium sand with coarse . Gravel = 12% gravel and trace silt Sand = 8796Slit/Clay I = 1 % Zz 4A, S� S C 4A The a Ircup,I`nc. 1 Land;stape S=rchit.et tS. Civil Engineers and -Environmental Consultants STORM -DRAINAGE STUDY For SERENA CONSTRUCTION 1-LOT BUILDING PERMIT 10611220 STREET SW EDMONDS.) WASHINGTON M) I ;;. C .' �..: ® APPLICANT: -7 Contact: Irfan Pardhan Serepa Cor struction6 , LLC 7003.1.17`t Place NE Kirkland, WA 98033 % Vj (425) 531 1334_; JGE Pro ect:.03-0013 $ �- S� .� Issue date: DULY 13.2004 4 $ , PREPARED BY: BRiAN KALA.B, P.E S _ ,i ` t 36499 RECEIVED :. JUL 14 2004 PERMIT COUNTER 1927-,5th'Street Marvivill'e, WA 98270 (360) 659-8159 Fax: (360) 651-7252 e-mail: mailgiavvrouplic.com The Jay Group, Inc. Landscape Archifecfs, Civil Engineers and fnvironmenfal Consulfanfs STORM DRAINAGE STUDY For SERENA CONSTRUCTION 1-LOT BUILDING PERMIT 10611226TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 6 APPLICANT: Contact: Irfan Pardhan Serena Construction Co., LLC 7003 117' Place NE Kirkland, WA 98033 . (425) 531-1334 JGE Project: 03-0013 Issue date: JULY 13, 2004 PREPARED BY: BRIAN KALAB, P.E R. 0 C' c' 36499 ExPREs 11-30_oy RECEIVED JUL 14 2004 PERMIT COUNTER 1927 - 51h S4reef - Marysville, WA 98270 - (360) 659-8159 - Fax: (360) 651-7252 - e-mail: mail@jaygrouplic.com 07/`14/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 02/10 • Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. on N July 13, 2004 Project No. KE04415A Serena Construction do Land Planning Northwest 1523 1011 Street Marysville, Washington 98270 Attention: Mr. Larry Deisher Subject: Infiltration Testing Results Edmonds Three -Lot Short Plat 1061122e Street SW Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Deisher: Associated Eardt- Sciences, Inc. (AESI) is pleased to present this letter providing the results. of the infiltration testing recently completed at the above -referenced site.. Our work has been completed in, accordance with our scope of work letter dated May 17, 2004 and in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect at the time of this study. SITE AND PROJECT CONDITIONS The subject site consists of ' a planned three -lot short plat located at 10611 22e Street SW in Edmonds; Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure I. It is our understanding that current plans call for on -site infiltration of storm water runoff from the proposed development. An infiltration evaluation was previously conducted for the site by Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. This study provided a recommended design infiltration rate for the storm water facility of 8.27 inches pei hour (iph). The recommended i�ltration rate was based on grain size (sieve) data on soil samples collected from two test pits excavated on the site, and on data presented in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound CITYCOPY 911 FifthAvcnuc.iUilr IM • Kirkknd. WA ?gpii • Phom 125 827•R EMEIVED JUL 14 2004 PERMIT COUNTER -07f14/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 03/10 Basin (Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), 1992) that correlates grain size data with infiltration rates. The purpose of our study was to conduct site -specific infiltration testing in the area of the proposed infiltration facility. It is our understanding that the facility will consist of an infiltration trench, approximately 4 feet deep, the middle of which will be located in the vicinity of infiltration test IF-1 (Figure 2). INFILTRATION TESTING Historically, two methods have been commonly employed to estimate field infiltration rates. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Failing Head Vest procedure and the Double Icing Infiltrometer Test (ASTM:D 3385-88). These methods have been found to overestimate actual infiltration performance, as described in the August 2001 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Ecology Manual). The Ecology Manual states on page 3-69 "Small scale infiltration tests such as the EPA Falling ,Head or double ring tq iltrometer test (ASTM D3385-88) are not remnmended-. ". For this reason infiltration testing for this project was conducted in general accordance with the Pilot Infiltration Test (PIT) method described in the Ecology Manual. The PIT test is conducted by discharging water into a flat-bottomed pit of known dimensions for a 4-hour "soaking period", to allow the receptor soils in the immWiate vicinity of the pit to become saturated. After completion of the soaking period, water is discharged into the pit at a rate sufficient to maintain a constant head. This is continued until the discharge rate required to maintain a constant head remains fairly consistent over a period of 1 hour. The testing procedure employed for infiltration test IF-1 deviated from the PIT procedure in that infiltration was conducted inside a pit of approximately 2 feet by 2 feet, rather than the 1.00 square foot area recommended in the Ecology Manual. This was conducted to ensure that the water supply for the test (water faucet) was adequate given the high permeability of the soils at the site. This modification to the Ecology Manual was judged to be a suitable alternative to the PIT test given the relatively small scale of the proposed infiiltration facility. An additional modification was that a constant head of 0.5 feet was maintained inside the pit for the test, rather than the 1.0 foot specified in the Ecology Manual. Because a greater head will result in a higher infiltration rate, this modification provides more conservative results. The water source used for the test consisted of a water faucet located on the site. Water was discharged into the pit through a fabric diffuser to minimize turbulence and scouring in the pit bottom. An electronic flow meter/totalizer was used to monitor the water discharge rate and total flow. A staff gauge with 0.01-foot divisions was installed inside the pit to monitor the head in the pit during testing. For the constant head test, a head of approximately 0.5 feet was maintained in the pit. Following completion of the constant head test, the flow of water into 2 07/14/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 04/10 the pit was discontinued and the rate of water level decline (falling head) in the pit was monitored. All infiltration test data was recorded by hand in the field and subsequently transferred to an electronic spreadsheet to allow more accurate and consistent infiltration rate calculations. The infiltration test data sheets are attached. Infiltration rates of 92 iph and 82 iph were measured during the constant bead and falling head tests, respectively. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Following completion of infiltration test IF-1, exploration pit IF-1 was excavated at the infiltration test location. Sediments encountered below the surficial forest duffltopsoil in exploration pit IF-1 were interpreted to be representative of Vashon advance outwash,. The Vashon advance outwash was deposited by - meltwater streams that emanated from the advancing glacial ice during the Vashoa. Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, approximately 12,500 to 15,000 years ago. The advance outwash sediments encountered in exploration pit IF-1 generally consisted of medium dense to dense, moist, gray to tan -gray sand with gravel and. minor quantities of silt. One exception was within approximately 2.5 feet of the ground surface where these sediments were observed to have been weathered to a loose to medium dense state and a tan color. The weathered soil zone also contained abundant silt and roots. The Vashon advance outwash sediments extended beyond the maximum depth explored of approximately 15 feet. Review of the regional geologic map titled Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Fart of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington by James Minard (1993) indicates that the area of the subject site is underlain by Vashon advance outwash. Our interpretation of the sediments encountered at the site is in general agreement with the regional geologic map. RECOMMENDED DESIGN INiFILTRATION RATE Infiltration rates measured during field testing ranged from approximately 82 to 92 iph. Due to differences in scale, lateral infiltration effects, and soil saturation effects, infiltration rates observed in full-scale infiltration facilities are typically less than those achieved during short- tem, small-scale tests, such as those performed for this study. For this reason, we recommend that a maximum infiltration rate of 20 iph be used for design of the proposed infiltration facility. This design infiltration rate is predicated on infiltration directly into the clean sand with gravel encountered in exploration pit IF-1 below a depth of approximately 3.5 feet. Based on the field test, it appears that the infiltration rate recommended by Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. is very conservative. q 07h412004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 05/10 We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you with this project. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Timothy J. Peter, P.G., P.Hg. Project Geologist Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Site and Exploration. Plan Exploration Pit Field Log Infiltration Test Data Sheets "PAd Kw"Iml twJcdM="15%WwP . wax 4 Jon N. Sondergaard, P.G., P.E.G. Senior Associate Geologist •07/14/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 07/10 9iHOUSESHED ----------------------------------- ! 20 Ft Wide Driveway Easement I r----------------------------------- .---------------------------- .- 1 LI 1 i i•, i LOT 3 S1Z ���: •, �a TP-2 IF-1 , I� ' ,, - - - " _.—.—.—. .—.—.....—._..._._...J.- , 226th . 1 , LOT 1 Street SW LEGEND IF-1 ■ Approximate location of AESI exploration pItAntilovIon test TP-1 Q Approximate location of Nelson Geotechnicai Associates exploration pit N s A REFERENCE: NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES. INC. NOT TO SCALE Associated earth sclaaeet, let. SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 2 ® ® ® ® EDMONDS SHORT PLAT DATE 7/04 EDMONDS. WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE0"15A 07/14/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI r"M u01.v CONSTANT HEAD DATA Project Nan* Serena Edmonds Job No. KE04415A Date 719104 Weather Cloudy, 60s Test No. IF-1 Meter 0.3 - 3 gpm (x2)" Water Source faucet Pit Size 1.8 ft. x 1.8 ft. Test Depth 4.0 Beet Testing Performed By Tip Elapsed Time Flow Rate Stage Totalizer Infiltration Rate Time (minutes 19 m) (feet) ( Mons) (inchesfhour) 9:11:00 0 0 0.00 0.00 -- 9:35:00 24 4.16 0.50 99.92 123.69 9:45:00 34 3.99 0.60 139.83 118.57 10:01:00 50 4.06 0.53 204.83 120.69 10:15:00 64 3.90 0.52 259.49 116.99 10:30:00 79 3.82 0.50 316.77 113.45 10:45:00 94 3.86 0.50 374.64 114.62 11:00:00 109 3.78 0.50 431.38 112.38 1115:00 124 3.68 0.50 486.65 109.47 11:30:00 139 3.61 0.50 640.73 107.11 11:45:00 154 3.52 0.50 593.58 104.67 12:00:00 169 3.52 0.51 646.41 104.63 12:16:00 185 3.21 0.49 697.74 95.31 12:30:00 199 3.36 0.50 744.81 99.89 12:45:00 214 3.22 0.50 793.17 95.78 13:06:00 235 3.21 0.50 850.67 95A9 13:15:00 244 3.19 0.50 899.41 94.87 13:26:00 254 3.14 0.50 920.80 93.26 13:35:00 264 3.17 0.50 952.48 94.12 13:45:00 274 3.18 0.50 984.29 94.50 13:65:00 284 3.18 0.50 1016.04 94.33 14:05:00 294 3.13 0.50 1047.36 93.05 14:15:00 304 3.10 0.50 1078.36 92.07 14:25:00 314 3.19 0.60 1110.21 94.65 Shutdown Flow @ 14:28:00 *Flow Split between two flow meters to maintain a flow to eaCh meter within calibration range. 07114/2004 07:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 09I10 FALLING HEAD DATA Infitration Test IF-1 TIMS Elapsed Time (minutes) Stage (feet) InnRration Rate (inchesihour) 14:28:00 0.00 0.60 -- 14:28:30 0.50 0.43 14:29:00 1.00 0.40 43.2 14:29:30 1.50 0.35 72.0 14:30:00 2.00 0.30 72.0 14:30:30 2.50 0.24 $6.4 14:31:00 3.00 0.19 72.0 14:31:30 3.50 0.12 100.8 14:32:00 4.00 0.06 86.4 Average for Duration of Test --- — 81.6 *value disregarded - likely influenced by water draining from hose. value disregarded' 07/14/2004 87:52 4258275424 AESI PAGE 10/10 LOG OF EXPLORATION PIT NO. IF-1 This lop be is part Qf the report prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) for the named protect end �+�� t read together wrath that report for complete tnterpretatlon. This summary ppplles Dray to the of epThe d �gen�d aerie g Wm itn f eq n tutb �a a bons tOed�� at this Location + tha passage DESCRIPTION -Forest Duff/TOpsoil _ eathered Vashon Advance Oulwas 1 - Loose to medium dense, slightly moist, tan, SILTY SAND with gravel, scattered cobbles; abundant roots throughout. Vashon AdvanceSh 3 Medium dense. moist, gray SAND with gravel; scattered Cobbles. few silt: trace silt below 3.5; becomes medium dense to dense below 51; becomes tan -gray below 10'. 4 , 5 - 6 - 7- 8- 9- 10 - 11 12 13 14 15 -1— 16 - BoNottosmeopaofgQeWN0reotiOcavin pltn0at deed+ 15 feet . N. 17 18 19 Edmonds Short Plat Edmonds, WA Associated Earth Sciences. Inc. project No. KE0441SA Logged by: UP a ® ® July 2004 Approvad by: f �' VICINITY MAP 454ELM W ZTCOMB ,G \� \j � k.�% 1 ¢ PC sb `Y �R P1- � LJ N �2 W GWOpp r' `'^ I B BIRCH pL� v QP�`�- v t� y <y ru.SMgk an ;y w s 90Q g " ST 47 y \, 0 1 KULSH \�. ni Wr s 1 mm sr � 22 1 0^ r o�p I+ rsWw GQNQUIN 22 m s t �\vrn� Wsw �TuLW LN N �0�130 RD 2 106 = am m sa ; 1 re o N SITE F�`�� CEM a 22nH PL a _, a 31050 9 DEER g DR > 2 S Q 2wn ff pL SW PARK 4 N ��� `'�fi J SW ` 01 RESERVE w �' ea Q. r-1 3 �- 232N0 I 231ST :I a � ROBI c� J T.W c. 232ND PHOTO TAKEN FROM THE 1998 THOMAS BROTHERS® GUIDE CD-ROM FIGURE 1- VICINITY MAP AY Cj ROUP SERENA CONSTRUCTION SHORT PLAT ENGINEERING, EDMONDS, WA INC SCALE: NONE DATE: 9/09/03 JOB #: 03-0013 1927 5TH STREET, MARYSVILLE, WA, 98270 BY: MRG FILE NAME: 03-0013\documents\drainage\VICINITYMAP.doc (360) 659.6159, (360) 651.7252 FAX ENGINEERIN68JAY0ROUPLLC.COM Serena Construction SP Drainage Study 1. ATTACHMENT "A" DRAINAGE INFORMATION SUMMARY FORM Project Name: Serena Construction Short Plat Project Engineer: JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. Project Applicant: Serena Construction Kirkland, WA Project Total Area: 0.93 Acres Project Development Area: 0.44 Acres Summary Table Number of Lots: 3 Drainage Basin Information Individual Basin Designation A B C D On -site Development Area 0.44 ac Type of Storage Proposed Infiltration Approximate Storage Volume. 600 cf Soil types Everett Type A Pre -developed Runoff Rate Q cfs 2 year na 10 year na 100 year na Post -developed Runoff Rate Before / after controlling Q cfs 2 year na / na 10 year na / na 100 year 0.331 na r JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT: 030013 Serena Construction SP Drainage Study 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project is located within the SW'/4 of the SW'/4 of Section 25, Township 27N, Range 3E, WM. The site is located on the north side of 226 h Street SW, approximately 150 feet west of 106'' Avenue W. An existing home will be removed. Residential landscaping surrounds the existing home. No critical areas were found on the site. The site is nearly flat. It generally slopes towards the southwest corner of the property. Runoff enters a drainage ditch on the north side of 220h Avenue. It then flows to the west into an ADS pipe, which ends 100 feet west of the site. It is assumed that the runoff infiltrates into the ground. From the Soil Conservation Service Map of Snohomish County, the site is shown to contain Everett type soils. The same manual classifies these as Type "A" soils, and states "permeability of this Everett soil is rapid" JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT: 030013 Serena Construction SP Drainage Study 3. DRAINAGE PROPOSAL The proposed improvements will add 4000 square feet of driveway. The one proposed home with 15,000 square feet of rooftop and driveway area. A total of 19,000 square feet of new impervious area was assumed for drainage calculations. All post -development runoff from the proposed home, and driveway will be conveyed by a two catch basins and storm drainpipe to an infiltration trench located under the private road. The facility was sized by routing the Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph for the 100-yr, 24-hr storm through a 90'x 2'x 4' trench, assuming a 20 inches per hour infiltration rate, and a void ratio of 30%. A geotechnical analysis of the site showed an infiltration rate of 80"per hour, a factor of safety of 4 was used on this rate to produce an infiltration rate of 20 inches per hour. The trench was designed in accordance with the 2001 DOE Stormwater Management. Manual for Western Washington. The impervious areas for this site were routed using a CN number of 98. The time of concentration used for the design was the minimum prescribed by the 1986 TR-55 runoff manual and is 6 minutes. JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT: 030013 Serena Construction SP Drainage Study 4. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT: 030013 Infiltration Trench Time Step Analysis Model Permeability. Pm Onlhr) 20 Infiltration Rate, IR (ftsec) 4.63E-o4 Reviewed by: Brian R. Kalab, P Factor of Safety, FS 1 Length. L (it) 90 Date: 7/13/2004 width. w (tit) 2 Depth, D (fl) 4. Pipe Diameter, PD On) 8 Void Ratio, VR 0.3 Design Volume, V (cf) 238 - Infiltration Rate, IR - Pm143,200 Volume. V - (3.1416•(PDr24)A2 •(W'D- 3.14/8•(PD/24)-2)•VR)'L Column (1) - Design Hydrograph using SCS Type IA Rainfall distribution Column (2) = Summation of Column (1) Column (3) - (SWCoiumn (1) ♦ Previous Column (6)y(LwVR) Column (4) - IF (2'L•Column (3) +L'Vh•IWF9Cotumn (1), THEN Oi=Column (1) ELSE Ot - (rLTWumn (3)+L'w)•IRIFS Column (5) - Summation of Column (4) Column (8) - Column (2) - Column (5) _ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Design Cummulative Stage Outflow Cummulative Net Hydrograph Volume Height OI Volume Storage (ols) (CI) (a) (as) (c0 (cf) 0.0000 0 0.00 0.0000 0 0 0.0000 0 - 0.00 0.0000 0 0 0.0000 0 0.00 0.0000 0 0 0.0003 0 0.00 0.0003 0 0 0.0020 1 0.02 0.0020 1 0 0.0049 4 0.05 0.0049 4 0 0.0076 9 0.08 0.0076 9 0 0.0099 15 0.11 0.0099 15 0 0,0119 22 0.13 0.0119 22 0 0.0137 30 0.15 0.0137 30 0 0.0171 40 0.19 0.0171 40 0 0.0208 53 023 0.0208 53 0 0.0228 67 025 0.0228 67 0 0.0243 81 027 0.0243 81 0 0.0257 97 029 0.0257 97 0 0.0266 113 0.30 0.0258 113 0 0.0305 131 0.34 0.0305 131 0 0.0345 152 0.38 0.0345 152 0 0.0358 173 0.40 0.0358 173 0 0.0369 195 0.41 0.0369 195 0 0.0377 218 0.42 0.0377 218 0 0.03a5 241 0.43 0.0385 241 0 0,0422 256 0.47 0.0422 266 0 0.0463 204 0.51 0.0463 294 0 0.0473 322 0.53 0.0473 322 0 0.0480 361 0.53 0.0480 351 0 0.0485 380 0.54 o.mm 380 0 0.0491 410 0.55 0.0491 410 0 0.0534 442 0.59 0.0534 442 0 0.0582 477 0.65 0.0582 477 0 0.0591 512 0.66 0.0591 512 0 0.0595 548 0.66 0.0595 548 0 0.0600 584 0.67 0.0600 584 0 0.0603 620 0.87 0.0603 620 0 0.0651 659 0.72 0.0651 659 0 0.0702 701 0.78 0.0702 701 0 0.0710 744 0.79 0.0710 744 0 0.0714 787 0.79 0.0714 787 0 0.0716 830 0.90 0.0716 830 0 - 0.0719 873 0.80 0.0719 873 0 0.0857 924 0.95 0.0857 924 0 0.1007 985 1.12 0.1007 985 0 0.1024 1046 - 1.14 0.1624 1046 0 0.1190 1117 1.32 0.1190 1117 0 0.1370 1200 1.52 0.1370 1200 0 0.1955. 1317 2.17 0.1955 1317 0 0.3291 1614 3.66 0.3291 1514 0 0.3174 1705 3.53 0.3174 1705 0 0.1891 1818 2.10 0.1891 1818 0 0.1292 1896 1.44 0.1292 1896 0 --- 0.1055 2024 1.17 0.1055 _ 2024 0 0.0890 .2077 0.99 0.0890 2077 0 0.0711 2120 0.79 0.0711 2120 0 0.0695 2161 0.77 0.0695 2161 0 0.0693 2203 0.77 0.0693 2203 0 0.0694 2245 0-77 0.0894 2245 0 0.0694 2286 0.77 0.0694 2286 0 Project Name: Flett SP Qin vs. Qout 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 m 17 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Time (24-hm) Instant vs. Design Depth 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 0 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Il.11:'1 7t.:I Instant vs. Design Volume 250 200 150 0 > 100 50 0 _ --- Time (24ahm) ----- J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 o((y�f^�nn a e � AAa�pp CI�OO^ � r1r Haa :ON3 milli n!i� 1i+i1id�3�i�e� eA e, d+�a ull ain Inn.. M iuU.11uH.R.. aS vil eg aav a as � a �� fV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i4l4^30o^c3^802o@3Sqq 5 8 a8Bss'8Ins; 8 ���8"^doS'S'8883d3b°o`do8888$80`'38'b°0000�d88o82�F3o38'db'o 3 d d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 o d d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d d 6 d o c o d o o d d d d d d o 0 0 o d d d d d o 0 0 0 o d d d o d o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0,0 0 0 0 �r; t� r;r �r; 10m`R10m33 QR 82 8 8aaaa8Sie3A A-AAAA2AAi-AAi2A2222nniAA22AtaAl2 r,AA--'AN122 d o 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d d d d d o 6 d d o d o d o d d o o d d o 0 o d o o d o 0 0 0 0 o d o d d d o d o o d oo o d o 0 0 o d i �n-2$ ����� ^� oa(�� $n'N°%aR ^ 3Aa"m O a� ^ ^ bNa�m ° �D '3'2r� o ��N������,��.�111 ����I��<� «tea<°a!aaa d 14 o000 00 0 0 8 8 S888o d do b oo 8d888 o a oo 6dd6 . . 0008d 8o do.o dB 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,0000 Given: Project= Roadway and Driveways Area= 0.44 acres, (19,000 Sq.Ft.) Pt= 3.00 in Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Hyetograph Values for the 100 Year 24 Hour Storm dt= 10.00 min. Serena Construction Short Plat Tc= 6.00 min. (Developed) PERVIOUS Parcel IMPERVIOUS Parcel Area= 0.00 acres Area= 0.44 acres Reviewed By: Brian R. Kalab, P.E. CN= 80 CN= 98 Date: 7/13/2004 S= 2.50 S= 0.20 0.2S= 0.50 0.2S 0.04 Compute: Existing Conditions Runoff hydrograph i Column (3)= SCS Type IA Rainfall distribution Column (4)= Col. (3) x Pt = 100 yr-24hr Hyetograph at this location Column (5)= Accumulated Sum of Co. (4) Column (6)= [If P <= 0.2S] = 0; Note, use PERVIOUS S value [If P > 0.2S] = (Col. (5) - 0.2S)^2/(Col.(5) + 0.8S); using the PERVIOUS Area "S" value. Column (7)= Col. (6) of Present Time Step - Col. (6) of Previous Time Step Column (8)= Same method as for Col. (6), except use the IMPERVIOUS Area "S" value Column (9)= Col. (8) of Present Time Step - Col. (8) of Previous Time Step Column (10)= ((PERVIOUS area / Total area) x Col. (7)) + ((IMPERVIOUS area / Total area) x Col.(9) Column (11)= (60.5 x Col:(10) x Total Area) / 10 (dt = 10 minutes) Routing Constant, w = dt / (2Tc + dt) = 0.4545 Column (12)= Col. (12) of Previous Time Step + (w x [Col.(11) of Previos Time Step + CoI.(11) Of Present Time Step - (2 x Col.(12) of Previous Time Step)]) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Time Time Rainfall Incremental Accumulated Accumulated Incremental Accumulated Incremental Total Instant design Increment distribution Rainfall Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff hydrograph hydrograph min. % of Pt in. in. in. in. in. in. in. cis cfs 1 10 0.0040 0.0120 0.0120 0.0000. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20 0.0040 0.0120 0.0240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3 30 0.0040 0.0120 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4 40 0.0040 0.0120 0.0480 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002 0,0002 0.0002 0.0007 0.0003 5 50 0.0040 0.0120 0.0600 0.0000 0.0000 0.0016 0.0014 0.0014 0.0037 0.0020 6 60 0.0040 0.0120 0.0720 0.0000 0.0000 0.0041 0,0025 0.0025 0.0066 0.0049 7 70 0.0040 0.0120 0.0840 0.0000 0.0000 0.0075 0.0034 0.0034 0.0091 0.0076 8 80 0.0040 0.0120 0.0960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0117 0.0042 0.0042 0.0112 0.0099 9 90 0.0040 0.0120 0.1080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0166 0.0049 0.0049 0.0130 0.0119 10 100 0.0040 0.0120 0.1200 0.0000 0.0000 0.0221 0.0055 0.0055 0.0146 0.0137 11 110 0.0050 0.0150 0.1350 0.0000 0.0000 0.0297 0.0076 0,0076 0.0202 0.0171 12 120 I i 0.0050 0.0150 0.1500 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0381 0.0063 0.0083 0.0221 0.0208 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 I i I 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 260 21,0 220 230 240 290 i 260 27,0 280 290 30.0 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 360 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460 470 480 460 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 560 560 i 0.0050 0.0150 0.1650 0.0000 0.0000 0.0470 0.0089 0.0089 0.0238 0.0228 0.0050 0.0150 0.1800 0.0000 0.0000 0.0564 0.0095 0.0095 0,0252 0.0243 0.0050 0.0150 0.1950 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 0.0099 0.0099 0.0264 0.0257 0.0050 0.0150 0.2100 0.0000 0.0000 0.0767 0.0103 0.0103 0.0275 0.0268 0.0080 0.0180 0.2280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0895 0.0129 0.0129 0.0343 0.0305 0.0060 0.0180 0.2460 0.0000 0.0000 0.1029 0.0133 0.0133 0.0355 0.0345 0.0060 0.0180 0.2640 0.0000 0.0000 0.1166 0.0137 0.0137 0.0365 0.0358 0.0060 0.0180 0.2820 0.0000 0.0000 0.1306 0.0141 0.0141 0.0374 0.0369. 0.0060 0.0180 0,3000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1450 0.0144 0.0144 0.0382 0,0377 0.0060 0.0180 0.3180 0.0000 0.0000 0.1596 0.0146 0.0146 0.0390 0.0385 0.0070 0.0210 0.3390 0.0000 0,0000 0.1770 0.0174 0.0174 0.0463 0.0422 0.0070 0.0210 0.3600 0.0000 0.0000 0.1947 0.0177 0.0177 0.0470 0.0463 0.0070 0.0210 0.3810 0.0000 0.0000 0.2126 0.0179 0.0179 0.0477 0.0473 0.0070 0.0210 0.4020 0.0000 0.0000 0.2308 0.0182 0.0182 0.0483 0.0480 0.0070 0.0210 0.4230 0.0000 0.0000 0.2491 0.0184 0.0184 0.0489 0.0485 0.0070 0.0210 0.4440 0.0000 0.0000 0.2677 0.0185 0.0185 0.0494 0.0491 0.0082 0.0246 0.4686 0.0000 _ 0.0000 0.2896 0.0219 0.0219 0.0584 0.0534 0.0082 0.0246 0.4932 0.0000 0.0000 0.3117 0.0221 0.0221 •0.0589 0.0582 0.0082 0.0246 0.5178 0.0001 0.0001 0.3341 0.0223 0.0223 0.0594 0.0591 0.0082 0.0246 0.5424 0.0007 0.0006 0.3565 0.0225 0.0225 0.0598 0.0595 0.0082 0.0246 0.5670 0.0017 0.0010 0.3791 0.0226 0.0226 0.0602 0.0600 0.0082 0.0246 0.5916 0.0032 0.0015 0.4019 0.0227 0.0227 0.0605 0.0603 0.0095 0.0285 0.6201 0.0055 0.0023 0.4284 0.0265 0.0265 0,0705 0.0651 0.0095 -0.0285 0.6486 0.0083 0.0028 0.4550 0.0266 0.0266 .0.0709 0.0702 0.0095 0.0285 0.6771 0.0117 0.0034 0.4818 0.0268 0.0268 0.0712 0.0710 0,0095 0.0285 0.7056 0.0156 0.0039 0.5086 0.0269 0.0269 0.0715 0.0714 0.0095 0.0285 0.7341 0.0200 0.0044 0.5356 0.0270 0.0270 0.0718 0.0716 0,0095 0.0285 0.7626 0.0250 0.0049 0.5627 0.0271 0.0271 0.0721 0.0719 0.0134 0.0402 _ 0.8028 0.0327 0.0078 0.6010 0.0383 0.0383 0.1020 0.0857 0.0134 0.0402 0.8430 0.0414 0.0087 0.6395 0.0385 0.0385 0.1024 0.1007 0.0134 0.0402 0.8832 0.0509 0.0095 0.6781 0.0386 0.0386 0.1028 0.1024 0.0180 0.0540 0.9372 0.0651 0.0141 0.7301 0.0520 0.0520 0.1385 0.1190 0.0180 0.0540 0:9912 0.0807 0.0156 0.7824 0.0522 0.0522 0.1390 0.1370 0.0340 , 0.1020 1.0932 0.1138 0.0331 0.8815 _ 0.0991 0.0991 0.2637 0.1955 0.0540 0.1620 1.2552 0.1752 0.0614 1.0397 0.1582 0.1582 0.4212 0.3291 0.0270 0.0810 1.3362 0.2096 0.0344 1.1191 0.0794 0.0794 0.2114 0.3174 0.0180 0.0540 1.3902 .0.2337 0.0242 1.1721 0.0530 0.0530 0.1412 0.1891 0.0134. 0.0402 1.4304 0.2523 0.0186 1.2116 0.0395 0.0395 0.1052 0.1292 0.0134 0.0402 1.4706 0.2714 0.0191 1.2512 0.0396 0.0396 0.1053 0.1074 0.0134 0.0402 1.5108 0.2910 0.0196 1.2908 0.0396 0.0396 0.1054 0.1055 0.0088 0.0264 1.5372 0.3041 0.0131 1.3168 0.0260 0.0260 0.0692 0.0890 0.0088 0.0264 1.5636 0.3174 0.0133 1.3428 0.0260 0.0260 0.0693 0.0711 0.0088 0.0264 1.5900 0.3309 0.0135 1.3689 0.0260 0.0260 0.0693 0.0695 0.0088 0.0264 1.6164 0.3446 0.0137 1.3949 0.0260 0.0260 0.0693 0.0693 0.0088 0.0264 1.6428 0.3585 0.0139 1.4210 0.0261 0.0261 0.0694 0.0694 0.0088 0.0264 1.6692 0.3726 0.0141 1.4470 0.0261 0.0261 0.0694 0.0694 0.0088 0.0264 1.6956 0.3868 0.0142 1.4731 0.0261 0.0261 0.0694 0.0694 60 600 0.0088 0.0264 1.7220 0.4012 0.0144 1.4992 0.0261 0.0261 0.0694 0.0694 61 61,0 0.0088 0.0264 1.7484 0.4158 0.0146 1.5253 0.0261 0.0261 0.0695 0.0695 62 620 0.0088 0.0264 1.7748 0.4305 0.0147 1.5514 0.0261 0.0261 0.0695 0.0695 63 630 0.0088 0.0264 1.8012 0.4454 0.0149 1.5775 0.0261 0.0261 0.0695 0.0695 64 640 0.0088 00264 1.8276 0.4605 0.0151 1.6036 0.0261 0.0261 0.0695 0.0695 65 650 0.0072 0.0216 1.8492 0.4729 0.0124 1.6250 0.0214 0.0214 0.0569 0.0638 66 660 0.0072 00216 1.8708 0.4855 0.0125 1.6464 0.6214 0.0214 0.0569 0.0575 67 670 0.0072 0.0216 1.8924 0.4981 0.0126 1.6678 0.0214 0.0214 0.0569 0.0570 68 680 0.0072 0.0216 1.9140 0.5108 0.0127 1.6892. 0.0214 0.0214 0.0569 0.0569 69 690 0.0072 0.0216 1.9356 0.5237 0.0128 1.7105 0.0214 0.0214 0.0569 0.0569 70 .700 0.0072 0.0216 1.9572 0.5366 0.0129 1.7319 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 71 710 0.0072 0.0216 1.9788 0.5496 0.0130 1.7533 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 72 720 0.0072 0.0216 2.0004 0.5627 0.0131 1.7748 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 73 730 0.0072 0.0216 2.0220 0.5760 0.0132 1.7962 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 74 740 0.0072 0.0216 2.0436 0.5893 0.0133 1.8176 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 75 750 0.0072 00216 2.0652 0.6026 0.0134 1.8390 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 76 760 0.0072 0.0216 2.0868 0.6161 0.0135 1.8604 0.0214 0.0214 0.0570 0.0570 77 77, 0 0.0057 0.0171 2.1039 . 0.6268 0.0107 1.8774 0.0170 . 0.0170 0.0451 0.0516 78 780 0.0057 0.0171 2.1210 0.6376 0.0108 1.8943 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0457 79 790 0.0057 0.0171 2.1381 0.6485 0.0108 1.9113 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 80 800 0.0057 0.0171 2.1552 0.6593 0.0109 1.9283 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 81 810 0.0057 0.0171 2.1723 0.6703 0.0109 1.9452 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 82 820 0.0057 0.0171 2.1894 0.6813 0.0110 1.9622 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 83 830 0.0057 0.0171 2.2065 0.6923 0.0110 1.9792 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 84 840 0.0057 0.0171 2.2236 0.7034 0.0111 1.9962. 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 85 850 0.0057 0.0171 2.2407 0.7145 0.0111 2.0131 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 86 860 0.0057 .0.0171 2.2578 0.7257 0.0112 2.0301 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 87 870 0.0057 0.0171 2.2749 0.7369 0.0112 2.0471 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 88 880 0.0057 0.0171 2.2920 0.7482 0.0113 2.0641 0.0170 0.0170 0.0452 0.0452 89 800 0.0050 0.0150 2.3070 0.7581 0.0099 2.0790 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0427 90 900 0.0050 0.0150 2.3220 0.7681 0.0100 2.0939 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0399 91 910 0.0050 0,0150 2.3370 0.7781 0.0100 2.1088 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 92 920 0.0050 0.0150 2.3520 0.7881 0.0100 2.1237 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 93 930 0.0050 0.0150 2.3670 0.7982 0.0101 2.1386 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 94 940 0.0050 0.0150 2.3820 0.8083 0.0101 2.1535 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 95 950 0.0050 0.0150 2.3970 0.8184 0.0101 2.1684 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 96 960 0.0050 0.0150 2.4120 0.8286 0.0102 2.1833 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 97 970 0.0050 0.0150 2.4270 0.8388 0.0102 2.1982 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 98 980 0.0050 0.0150 2.4420 0.8490 0.0102 2.2131 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 99 990 0.0050 0.0150 2.4570 0.8593 0.0103 2.2280 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 100 1000 0.0050 0.0150 2.4720 0.8696 0.0103 2.2429 0.0149 0.0149 0.0397 0.0397 101 1010 0.0040 0.0120 2.4840 0.8778 0.0083 2.2548 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0361 102 1020 0.0040 0.0120 2.4960 0.8861 0.0083 2.2668 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0321 103' 1030 0.0040 0.0120 2.5080 0.8944 0.0083 2.2787 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 104 1040 0.0040 0.0120 2.5200 0.9027 0.0083 2.2906 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 105 1050 .0.0040 0.0120 2.5320 0.9111 0.0083 2.3026 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 106 ' 1060 0.0040 0.0120 2.5440 0.9194 0.0084 2.3145 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 107 1070 0.0040 0.0120 2.5560 0.9278 0.0084 2.3264 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 108 ' 1080 0.0040 0.0120 2.5680 0.9362 0.0084 2.3384 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 109 1090 0.0040 0.0120 2.5800 0.9446 0.0084 2.3503 0.0119 0.0119 0,0318 0.0318 110 1100 0.0040 0.0120 2.5920 0.9531 0.0084 2.3622 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 111 1110 0.0040 0.0120 2.6040 0,9615 0.0085 2.3742 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 112 1120 0.0040 0.0120 2.6160 0.9700 0,0085 2.3861 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 113 1130 0.0040 0.0120 2.6280 0.9785 0.0085 2.3980 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 114 1140 0.0040 0.0120 2.6400 0.9870 0.0085 2.4100 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 115 1150 0.0040 0.0120 2.6520 0.9955 0.0085 2.4219 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 116 1160 0.0040 0.0120 2.6640 1.0041 0:0085 2.4338 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 117 1170 0.0040 0.0120 2.6760 1.0126 0.0086 2.4458 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 -0.0318 118 1180 0.0040 0.0120 2.6880 1.0212 0.0086 2.4577 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 119 1190 0.0040 0.0120 2.7000 1.0298 0.0086 2.4696 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 120 1200 0.0040 0.0120 2.7120 1.0384 0.0086 2.4816 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 121 1210 0.0040 0.0120 2.7240 1.0470 0.0086 2.4935 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 122 1220 0.0040 0.0120 2.7360 1.0557 0.0086 .2.5055 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 123 1230 0.0040 0.0120 2.7480 1.0643 0.0087 2.5174 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0316 124 1240 0.0040 0.0120 2.7600 1.0730 0.0087 2.5293 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 125 1250 0,0040 0.0120 2.7720 1.0817 0.0087 2.6413 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 126 1260 0.0040 0.0120 2.7840 1.0904 0.0087 2,5532 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 127 1270 0.0040 0.0120 2.7960 1.0992 0.0087 2.5652 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 128 1280 0.0040 0.0120 2.8080 1.1079 0.0087 2.5771 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 129 1290 0.0040 0.0120 2.8200 1.1167 0.0088 2.5891 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 130 1360 0.0040 0.0120 2.8320 1.1255 0.0088 2.6010 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 131 13,10 0.0040 0.0120 2.8440 1.1343 0.0088 2.6130 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 132 1320 0.0040 0.0120 2.8560 1.1431 0.0088 2.6249 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 133 1330 0.0040 0.0120 2.8680 1.1519 0.0088 2.6368 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0,0318 134 1340 0.0040 0.0120 2.8800 1.1607 0.0088 2.6488 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 135 1350 0.0040 0.0120 2.8920 1.1696 0.0089 2.6607 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 136 1360 0.0040 0.0120 2.9040 1.1785 0.0089 2.6727 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 137 1370 0.0040 0.0120 2.9160 1.1874 0.0089 2.6846 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 138 1380 0.0040 0.0120 2.9280 1.1963 0.0089 2.6966 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 139 1390 0.0040 0,0120 2.9400 1.2052 0.0089 2.7085 0.0119 0.0119 0,0318 0.0318 140 1400 0.0040 0.0120 2.9520 1.2141 0.0089 2.7205 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 141 1410 0.0040 0.0120 2.9640 1.2231 0.0089 2.7324 0.0119 0.0119. 0.0318 0.0318 142 1420 0.0040 0.0120 2.9760 1.2320 0.0090 2.7444 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 143 1430 0.0040 0.6120 2.9880 1.2410 0.0090 2.7563 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 144 1440 0.0040 0.0120 3.0000 1.2500 0.0090 2.7683 0.0119 0.0119 0.0318 0.0318 Total Volume of Runoff = 4,410 cf Qavg = 0.0510 Qpeak = 0.3291 100 YEAR 24 HOUR ISOPLUVIAL MAP a Taken From NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume IX, Figure 30 100 YEAR 24 HOUR ISOPLUVIAL MAP SERENA CONSTRUCTION SHORT PLAT AY GROUP EDMONDS, WA ENGINEERING, INC SCALE: DATE: 9/22/03 �JOBH- 03-0013 r 5TH STREET, MARYSVII I E, WA, 98270 NONE (360) 65"159, (360) 651.7252 FAX FILE NAME: ENGINEERING@JAYGROUPLLC.COM BY• MRG • 03-0013\documents\drainage\100 YR ISOPLU—.doc N 300 000 FEET "J='I r l". Mt, -I- —141,14—fIT+74Q Ao A -ip -31 ire 4 j 'ur� b" 0 to U I co 'gar-7 1TE 1 1 S cn - irn a, Go A r i OCo. C as -4 rj KX. 3, G; 'J Fri Tr} !V� Pf Or 290 000 FEET (Joins sheet 57) 1.2, N. M M Cz E�: I ED M MI 01 0) This sell survey map was compiled by the U.S Department of Agriculture. Sell Conservation Service• and cooperating agencies. Base maps are ofth-Photag,ophs prepared by the State of Washington. D'evatiment of Natural Resources from 1973 and 1974 aerial photography. Coordinate gild ticks and land division corners. 11 shown• are approximately Positioned. 20 Soil survei this unit. Steep yarding paths, skid trails, and firebreaks are subject to rilling and gullying unless adequate water bars are provided or they are protected by plant cover. Establishing plant cover on steep cut and fill slopes reduces erosion. Seedling establishment and windthrow hazard are the main concerns in the production of timber. If seed trees are present, natural reforestation of cutover areas by western hemlock and Pacific silver fir occurs periodically. Reforestation can be accomplished by planting Douglas - fir seedlings. When openings are made in the canopy, invading brushy plants, if not controlled, can delay reforestation. Rock outcrop limits the even .distribution of eforestation. because the rooting depth is restricted by the hardpan or bedrock, trees are occasionally subject to windthrow. Vt estern hemlock, a shallow -rooted species, is more commoniv subject to windthrow than are more deeply doted trees. he main limitations for homesites and septic tank absorption fields are steepness of slope and depth to bedrock or the hardpan. A seasonal high water table is perched above the hardpan or bedrock; therefore, drainage is needed if buildings with basements and crawl spaces are constructed. Deep cuts in the Olom' punt soil can expose bedrock. This map unit is in capability subclass Vils. 7—Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes. This very deep, somewhat excessively drained soil is on terraces and outwash plains. It formed in glacial outwash. Areas are long and narrow and are oriented in a northwest to southeast direction. They are 1," to 40 acres in size. The native vegetation is mainly -onifem. Elevation is near sea level to 500 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 40 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F, and the average frost -free season is 170 to 190 days. Typicaliy, the surface layer, where mixed to a depth of about 6 inches, is dark brown gravelly sandy loam. The subsoil is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam about 12 inches thick. The upper part of the substratum is brown very gravelly loamy sand about 5 inches thick. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches or more is dark brown extremely gravelly sand. In some areas the substratum is weakly cemented. included in this unit are small areas of Alderwood soils on till plains, Indianola soiis on terraces and outwash plains, and Ragnar soils on outwash plains. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability of this Everett soil is rapid. Available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion .is slight. This unit is used mainly as woodland and for urban development. It is also used for pasture. Douglas -fir is the main woodland species on this unit. `J , the basis of a 100-year site curve, the mean site index is 141. On the basis of a 50-year site curve, the mean site index is 111. The mean annual increment at culmination (CMAI) for Douglas -fir at age 65 is 146 cub feet per acre. Among the trees of limited extent are ic western hemlock, western redcedar, and red alder. The common forest understory plants are salal, brackenfern, red huckleberry, common rose, and Oregon -grape. This unit is well suited to year-round logging. Logging roads require suitable surfacing for year-round use. Rock for road construction is readily available on this unit. Seedling mortality is the main limitation for the production of timber. Reforestation can be accomplished by planting Douglas -fir seedlings. High soil temperature and low soil moisture content during the growing season cause a high mortality of seedlings. When openings are made in the canopy, invading brushy plants, if not controlled, can delay the establishment of seedlings. If this unit is used for pasture, the main limitations are low available water capacity and low soil fertility. Proper grazing practices, weed control, and fertilizer are needed for maximum quality of forage. Supplemental irrigation is also needed. Periodic mowing and spreading of droppings help to maintain uniform growth and discourage selective grazing. This unit is suited to urban development; however, if the density of housing is moderate to high, community sewage systems are needed in places to prevent contamination of water supplies as a result of seepage from onsite sewage disposal systems. This map unit is in capability subclass Vis. 18—Everett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes. This very deep, somewhat excessively drained soil is on terraces and outwash plains. It formed in glacial outwash. Areas are long and narrow and are oriented in a northwest to southeast direction. They are 10 to 40 acres in size. The native vegetation is mainly conifers. Elevation is near sea level to 500 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 40 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F, and the average frost -free season is 170 to 190 days. Typically,. the surface layer, where mixed to a depth of about 6 inches, is dark brown gravelly sandy loam. The subsoil is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam about 12 inches thick. The upper part of the substratum is brown very gravelly loamy sand about 5 inches thick. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches or more is dark brown extremely gravelly sand. In some areas the substratum is weakly cemented. Included in this unit are small areas of Alderwood soils on till plains, Indianola soils on terraces and outwash plains, and Ragnar soils on outwash plains. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability of this Everett soil is rapid. Available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used mainly as woodland. It is also used for urban development and for hay and pasture. Table 1.2 Soil Type Agnew All] Aits Alderwood Arents, Alderwood Arents, Everett Ashoe Baldhill Bameston Baumeard i Beausite Belfast Bellingham Bellingham variant Boistfort Bow Briscot Buckley B unker Cagey ` Carlsborg Casey Cassolary Cathcart Centralia Chehalis Chesaw Cinebar Clallam Clayton Coastal beaches Kapowsin Katula Kilchis Kitsap Klaus Klone Lates Lebam Lummi Lynnwood Lystair Mal Manley Mashel Maytown McKenna McMurray Melbourne Menzel Mixed Alluvial vlolson runoff characteristics. SCS has classified over 4,000 soil types into these four soil groups. Table 1.2 shows the hydrolo is soil group of most soils in the state of Washington and provides a brief description of the four groups. rologic Soil Series for Soils in Washi Hydrologic Soil Soil Tvne ton State Hydrologic Soil C Colter C B Custer D C Custer, Drained C C Dabob C B Delphi D B Dick A B Dimal D B Dupont D C Earlmont r B Edgewick C B Eld B C Elwell B D Es C -verctt A B verson D Galvin D D Gctchell A C Giles g B Godfrey:. D C Greenwater A A Grove.'=;' C D,::.:z.. H, Carstine C, Hartrut. ' ' C $ "Hoh B floko C Hoodsport C -.A Hoogdal C B Hoypus A C Hue] A B Indianola A variable Jonas B C/D Jumpe B C Kalaloch C C Renton D C Republic B C ' Riverwash variable B Rober C C Salal C B Salkum B D Sammamish D A San Juan A B Scamman D C Schneider g B Seattle D B Sekiu D C Semiahmoo D D Shalear D D Shano B B Shelton C B Si C variable Sinclair C B Ski o a D Page 20 Volume III - Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control Design October 1999 f Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group Mukiltco C/D Skykomish B Naff B Snohopish B Nargar A Snohomish D National B Solduc B Ncilton A Solleks C Spana D Newberg B Spanaway A/B Nisqually B Springdale B Nooksack C Sulsavar B Norma CID Sultan C Ogarty C Sultan variant B Olete C Sumas C Olomount C Swantown D Olympic B Tacoma D Orcas D Tanwax D Oridia D Tanwax, Drained C Orting D Tealwhit D Oso C Tcnino C Ovall C Tisch D Pastik 1 C Tokui > C Pheency C Townsend C Phelan D Triton D Pilchuck C Tukwila :D Potchub C Tukey C Poulsbo C Urbana C Prather C Vailton B Puget D Vcrlot C Puyallup B Wapato D Queets B ..Warden B Quilcene C is `>Whidbey C Ragnar B: Wilkeson B Rainier =C Winston A Raught B Woodinville B Reed D:.,:;' Yclm C Reed, Drained or Protected °C Zynbar B Hydrologic Soil Group Classifications, as Defined by the Soil Conservation Service: A = (Law runoff potential) Soils having low runoff potential and high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted. The), consist chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels and have a high rate of water transmission (greater than 0.30 in/hr.). B = (Moderately low runoffpotential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These. soils have a moderate rate of water transmission (0.15-0.3 inAr.). C = (Moderatel); high runoff potential). Soils having low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chicflj, of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water and soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a low rate of water transmission (0.05-0.15 in/hr.). D = (Iligh runoff potential). Soils having high runoff potential They have very low infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consist chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very low rate of water transmission (0-0.05 in/hr.). ND = Data not currently available for this soil type. * = From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition, Jute 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made.fr•om SCS, Soil Interpretation Record, Form h5, September 1988 and various county soil surveys. October 1999 Volume Ill - Hydroloti c Analysis and Flow Control Design Page 21 STORKWAT- MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUCE' =ND BASIN Table III-1.3 SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Tvha 1 A rainfall ri i at-ri hnt-inn _ 7d-hn,,.- LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURVE.NUMBERS BY j HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A B C D Cultivated land(1).: winter condition 86 91 94 95 jMountain open areas: low growing brush & grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: ( 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 III Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. . Good condition: grass cover on t75% of the 68 80 86 90 area Fair condition: grass cover on 50-75% of 77 85 90 92 I the area Gravel roads & parking .lots: ! 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads & parking lots: 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs etc. 98 98 48 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds etc. 100 100 100 100 Single family residential(2): Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre %Impervious(3) Separate curve number 1.0 DU/GA 15 shall be selected for 1.5 DU/GA 20 pervious & impervious 2.0 DU/GA 25 portions of the site 2.5 DU/GA 30 or basin 3.0 DU/GA 34 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 PUD's, condos, apartments, impervious commercial businesses & must be industrial areas computed (i) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. III-i-12 FEBRUP3.Y, 1992 T M 0 RECEIVED JUL 242004 CITY COPY SERE GOW.7TRUGIT TRACKING NO S— AW— 1 ' 2 OUNTERREV)510N GATE: MCJKGH26B2 �Da9 PREI. I M I NAR SHORT`5DBOTVl� I OtV-- IN CITY 0 EOMONPS, WASHINGTON SEC. .2 T WN9HI1" 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, M. APPROVED BY PANNING- LEGEND 0 r wN N C•x O ® rove. *Rrs,.aRAo Q C4Dl �Yr ® GPOL! Jft •IW DO% Y TttMLTt RrRr 0 vrLrt 'Me f— Tu, Arc.�Lr ® rne. te•Er j1 FRE ... — D� vAYtR vALV[ `ve 0 AbL ea% � 4TD+DA�N _ w-„- e7DRv aAN a I.n VAIM Lr.R 100 AYRK — T — Ty2nOt1 ryNr weR —D T r c - .qrn urL,r..Arn wee T.Tbtft � NORR, 4GDI.eA "o TK.E —o.— 04"Vr &LRE ew a rPAVEL %ALe: r • 20 ZO 0 20 4 CONTOURS :2 PT. INTERVAL, N7Te5 2. 3. e 5 KIRKLAND, 'YA5H1.' 48033 425-531-1354 NY SURVEYOR: %W17 SURVE r ING, INC. 12606 82W AVE. NE WeAS KIRKLAND, WASH. 16034 425-81q-Bg87 (EDMOW5) ENGINEER: THE JAY GROUP INC. Ig27 5TH STReI�T BEET PARKING LOT. MA 65q I.E WASH. q6M PUGET WOODWAY FROJWT SITE EDMOND'5 VICINITY MAP ` xaLh 2,C1 NOTES i UILrt AFD/OR AIROVEAEM9 N1LM A1Ar E%AT MOEt<MOIID OR ARE WT WALE, wr HOT EE •RVJN qV TIN MAP. 21 TIN RL MH LONfAM Ad%A63 W rt. M 0.VK/t1. VERTICAL DATUM ASSUMED BENCHMARK HELD ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 500.00 FEET ON TOP OF CONCRETE MON. IN CASED AT 5OU'THWE57 COK. OF SECTION 25-27-3 • � SriE DENCHMpRK \' ; SET SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF UTILITY POLE •/- 30' SOUTH OF SOUTFEAST PROPERTY CORNER. BA51S OF PLAT OF WESTGATE ESTATE5, VOL. 20, I I�L� D PLAT BEARING OF N 0 Oq' 52'E BETWEEN MONUMENTS FNO. ALG. I04TH AVE. W. AS 'A -MN. DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION TOTAL LAM AREA g0483 50.FT. ( .qi AC.) AREA OF ROADWAY:3,3e' 50.FT.• 3,752 SQ.FT. lEASE) TOTAL ROAD LENGTH: 150 LIN, FEET NET DEVELOPMENT AREA: 36,021 SQ. FT. (0.83 AC) AREA OF LOT5: 3) 542 SO FT. PERCENT RD. TO TOTAL AREA: II% EXISTING ZONING: R-12 PROPOSED ZONING: 9-12 POWER 50PPLY: SNOHOMISH COUNTY P.U.D. NO I WATER 5UPPLY: CITY OF EOMONDS SEWER SERVICE: OLYMPIC VIEW WATER/SEWER DIET. GROSS DEV. DEN517Y: 3.23 0.U.'12/ACRE NET OEV. OEN61TY1 5.41 O.U.-2 / ACRE L +-' AVERAGE LOT 51ZE' 13,g99 SQ. FT.fGROtS) t� .SMALLEST LOT 512E: IO 651 SQ. FT, +�. .� TOTALL AREAOF TOPEN05PAGE! -0- 0 ►� % TOTAL AREA OPEN SPACE: -0- FIREE D15Tk,ICT: EDM7N0S NO, 5N01-IOM15H COUNTY D15T, N0. PROPOSED LAND UZE: 51N6LE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (DETACHED) LEGAL DESGklIFTION: THE EAST HALF OF THE &XVTH HALF OF THE NORTHIE77 OUARTER OF THE 5OU7HFE5T QUARTER OF THE 50UTH,VEST OIIARTER OF SECTION 15 TOIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 eA5T, W.M. IN ° 1RHgAl gri COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXCePT THE EAST 150 FEET THBREOP; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 65 FEET THEREOF; AW EXCEPT THE 5OUTH 20 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD, 5ITUATe IN 71-E COUNTY OF cl H lSHI, STATE OF WA51-IIN370N. PROPERTY ADDRESS: 10611 2Z6TH STREET S.W. W eDIXaNDS, WASHINGTON gB FFF TAX ACCT. NO. 270325-003.102-00 — Q PLANER: LAW PLANNING NORTHWEST LARRY D. OEI SHIER OATfR: SE ENA CONSTRUCTION CO 1523 TENTH STReET 7003 1 77H PLACE NE MARYSVILLE, WASH. g6270 KIM.AND, WASH. gB035 (425)33g-1302 425-531<1354 tAr APE ARCHITeCT: JASON T. WALKER P.O. DOX 1942 OWALL, WA5H, gBOlq 425-706-6316 ,ARCHITECT: NA5H JONES AWER50N 1164q NE BOTH STREET KIRKUAW, WASH. g6053 425-626-lg18 Aa-fT 1 OF I 11/27/2042 18:21 4258286326 Vec 16 03 04:22a SERENA CONSTRUCTION 425-489-4040 PAGE 01 p.2 Page 1 of 6 ZW231215 Deae=&w 15, 2003 <2D ASRESTO•TEST, INC. ASBESTOS SURVEY 10-611.226" St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98020 Serena Construction 70031176 PL n Kirkland,' WA 98M Attn: lEdiw Ph! 42SJUS-6876 fa= 425412W26 On December 9, 2003, Asbesto-Test personnel conducted an Asbestos survey (per U.S.IE.P.A.JAMIiL E.R.A. guidelines as designated and specified by Paget Sorn d Man Air Agency and Wasbington State) of die beW Ra 10611 226a SL SW. Ednroadx Sn_aaitM*-h Cortrdv. Wasiin om MOL This survey purpose is to identify any Asbestos Containing Materials that may be present and will require professional removal prior to denmlitiWL+eno % rrtion .iY RMATIVE OFFINDINGS RABIC CONSTRUCTION: The house is one story wood frame. The exterior siding is wood. There was no suspect ACM located beneath the wood siding exterior. The torch down roofing and silver seal surfacing materials were sampled. INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION, FINISHES, AND FLOORINGS: The interior is drywall and wood. The drywall/taping materials were uniformly sampled. Tile flooring materials with relating backings and mastics were sampled per each located homogenous area. The masonry splash tile and mastics were sampled from the kitchen and bathroom areas. The "loose lay" piece of sheet vinyl was sampled from beneath the kitchen sink area. ELECTRICAL SY8T M: The electrical wiring insulation is not of the kind to be ACM and was not sampled. Any .rtespwt electrical wiring insulation or etry swspecl TS1(Thermal System Insulation), found in, around, or behind any locatedfitse or breaker boxes should be considered to be ACM (Asbestos Containing Material), unless determined otherwise by laboratory• analysis. ATTIC/WALL INSUI ATION: The insulation was sampled. COM NUF r0 PACB i 14D Mt. D. FMe #187, SnoWmi lk WA 9a299 ph: 206-914-SSW (as. 360•563.240 paga 246-540-240r 11/27/2042 18:21 4258286326 'Vac IS 03 04:22a SERENA CONSTRUCTION PAGE 02 425-499-4040 p.3 ,Page 2 of 6 N0231215 December IS, 2003 Asbate-TeK !na (206) 914-5500 106LU2e Sc SW E&wn& Smaken Eth COW* &ENW&M 98020 FIFAnm AND VSNuLA-VION SYSTSK. There is a PR forced air furnace in the crawl space accessw front behind the fireplace. Time is ACM TSI taping on mist. ducting and also ticked above the ducting in raise. areas. Note: It was not possible to dismantle the furnace and ducting to locate and/or evaluate any additional suspect ACM which may be concealed inside the unit, or amociated in hidden areas It is our opinion any further handling of the furnace system should be coordinated by the project manager and/or abatement contractor. If any additional relating suspect materials are located prior to and/or during any demolition or renovation, any and all additional related suspect materials should be considered to be ACM (Asbe-Was Containing Material); unless determined to be otherwise by laboratory analysis. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL ACM TSl PRESENT ASSOCIATED WITH. THE FURNACE AND DUCTING SYSTEM THAT IS NOT LISTED IN THIS SURVEY. THE HEATING SYSTEM( SHOULD AGAIN BE THOROUGHLY INSPECTED BY THE ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PERSONNEL. AS THERE MAY BE ACM PRESENT THAT IS CONCEALED FROM VIEW. Any mUlitiOnd located TSI inside or outside the finuaee and/or darting system including but not limited to all gaskets, joint rompowx* scalants, and/or insulations, ass PACM unless tested otherwise by laboratory andyels. There was no suspect ACM located associated with the fireplace _system. Misc.: The window glazing was sampled. Additional Structures on sits included in survey: None,. # of s&ncfum included in survey: one XagwWed by. Wan @ Serena Canstracdon certified A.11E.R.A. Y 5327 INkpires 9112/04) AI-r eem9am to ggy 3 11/27/2042 18:21 4258286326 .,Dec 16 03 04:2aa SERENA CONSTRUCTION PAGE 03 425-499-4040 p.4 Page 3 of 6 IB#231215 Deco*" 15, zoos AsbW-!Test,11m (296) 914-5500 W112260 54 Mj B aobonrN Counts. DWALWER Any sad ad materials Wks~ as ACM or PACM is dlis repot't (aaftr sdditiatal materials aasotisted witb tbt structure tbst my be dit�emered and later identillad as ACM or PACM}, Must be profksolOnally abated prior to demebi0m ASSESSMIM AND QUAMVlCATIOAi OF ACM FOR ABATEIrMVT P177P0M AND/OR PAX"MG FOR REMOVAL SHOULD BE DMER11IIN10 BY ON Sr1E EVALUATION, AS LISTEA QUAM US ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND ARB AN APPROX111"TION ONLY. SAM9PM SAREALSES7WCO1YlMNGAlitMffl B, saMet4ammmjsmdM1C=ggdftt mdtekkasLard ANALYSIS ID _ . _ _ ASBESTOS//TYM/OUANJM OTi R I.0) ACM TSI TAPING yes // thryaotile ll 65-70% nao-Gbrms materWa FRIABLE ACM Taping b on ndsc. heat dttcdn` joints. The furnace is accessed fdrom the crawl Spam behind the fireplace. 1.0) ACM T'SI yea // thrymQe // 65.70% nos nbroas materials FRIABLE ACM ACM is teclmd above the best darling in arim areas is the crawl space between the ducting and floor joist. NOTE: TIE INSPECTOR WAS NOT ABLE TO DETERMINE QUANTITIES OF ACM TSI THAT IS PRESENT AS ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE CONCEALED WITHIN THE WALLS, CEILINGS, AND/OR FLOORS. QUANTITM OF AS16E.STOS FOR ABATEMENT ASSESSMENT AND/OR PRICING FOR REMOVAL SHOULD BE AETERMMD BY ON SITE EVALUATION. ALL TSI ASSOCIATED WrM TBZ n1RNACE/0UCTING SYSTEM THAT IS NOT VISII.Y FIBERGLASS MATERIAL IS PRESUMED ASBESTOS CONTAINING. ANY FLUE MORTAR PACKING MATERIAL THAT MAY BE LOCATED 1S ALSO PRESUMED ASBESTOS CONTAINING UNLESS TESTED OTHERWISE BY LABORATORY ANALYSIS. 2.0) FLOOR TILE yes // thrysotile // 245% nowflbroas materials ldtcben 9"x 9" floor tile -color. white streak ACM 2.1) BLACK MASTIC yes // cbrystrtlk // 2-5% adbmlvc, ctRailoaa MASTIC AND TILE IS NON470ABLE ACM APPROX. 200 SQ. FIT. ON WOOD A.T toutime t. pale 4 11/27/2042 18:21 4258286326 'beo 16 03 04122a SERENA CONSTRUCTION PAGE 04 425-499-4040 P.5 pqc' of 6 Dwzmber 15, 2OW nV,251215 Asbato-Tate Inc- (206) 914-5500 10-611 A of W EdWM S�rolkonr+tsb C Wash dffl 9$Da0 ANALXSIS Ill ASSESTOS/IIYPE// U tYPHBR MAT UAL- 3.0) FLOOR TILE yes // chrysotile // W19 non -fibrous snalerm east end 9"x 9" floor tflo-eolor: black isles rind ACM 3.I) FLOOR TILE yes // chrysotlle // 25% aroia-f6br>ss materials east cod 9" it 9" floor die -color: whitc interwfted ACM 3.2) BLACK MASTIC yea // cbrywAlle // 7r5% adhe&e, cellulose MASTIC AND TUX IS NON -FRIABLE.. ACM APPROX. 650 SQ. FT. ON woos 4.0) FLOOR TILE yes // cbnysotile // M % non -fibrous materials side entry -color. red brick ACME TILE IS NON-IFRUR E APPROX. 40 SQ. VF. ON WOOD 4.1) MASTIC NAD adbesive, cef close NOTE: Any Additional colors or kinds of floor We and/or mastics backings that were not discovered In this survey and may titer be located in this structure are also pressured to contain asbeatoo wdess fEested offm win by laboratory au*ab 5.0) ROOMG 25IMPACE yea // chrysot5ile // 2-5% non-fa'brovs wAttriels, "silver sear malarial an surface of torch down roof ceDulose ACM ROonm AREA APPROR. 2920 BQ. FT. -SILVER SEAL MATERIAL I5 FRL#BL)E 5.1) towneb down rooffimg NAD cellulose, ter, fiberglass, underlying roaterisb4benenth silver seal ton -fibrous natesiais I&M WAS NO ASBESTOS DETE_= IN AN OF TIM REMAINING SAMPLES 6.0) drywall ") drywall aping compounds SAMPLED PER AHERA PROTOCOL 6,2) surfim paint (ho mogeaoss 6m agboul) NAD non -fibrous materials cellulose, fiberglass, paint, (gypsum) NAD non -fibrous materials, cellulose, fiberglass NAD paint, cellulose A-r "atiaw to p2xa 5 11/27/2042 18:21 4258286326 SERENA CONSTRUCTION PAGE 05 'bec 16 03 04:22a 425-499-4040 p.6 ANW 5Of 6 DwomW 15,203 1BARR231215 I'm (206) 914-55M .1061122 —* St Sw" E�tdc SR MEWLC . D& MOSM eMA 98�0 .w. �•e •�-. i ammwanmr 09►I-7t7 T! almaltii LEGEND Q FND MCTNL W CASE O SANITARY SEWER MH ]� O POWER TRANSFORMER � ® CABLE RISER w� ® CABLE JINCTION BOX YV o TElEF1-DrE RISER -0- UTILITY POLE \ E— GUY ANDIOR ® WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT D4 WATER VALVE I ND O -MAL BOX CATCH BASIN 5S— SANITARY SEWER 3-113 —SO— STORM DRAINiL ut N _ W WATER LINE PAINT MARK — T TELEPHONE PAINT MARK —G T P C — JOINT UTILITY PAINT MARK G=,AS. T=TELEPHONE. P-POWER. C=CABLE a _— 0 o WOOD FENCE I —op— OVERHEAD POWER LIE EDGE OF GRAVEL 10727, 10706 'A I I I IVU 7. v 2, 173 Sa.FT, cAHar wrp. � 490 5F 1\ GONG . WAL s W PAVM r. N Q 22 W OF PROP LPE N S'P _ < IN N � W g ¢ Ifll00t F �` LLJ s ®•n �y PAVING 15 If Q W W OF PROP LPE ¢ a ®f Q) FBa MaE T. E O'�O� g.a r we a samw rfnm war KllOOt d ®M y� M IFNtIJ� y LiZLn} A �� Z e LL e O PAVIG CR09.5 PROP LOE a ��U_ o A I4 TL 3-100 o e e Z 10605 O R B#.� e ` w FA bN - SCALE 1' = 20' 20 0 20 40 i�a cn• GONTOUK5 2 FT. INTERVAL 106214 APPL I GANT : 5EKENA GONSTKUGT I ON GO. , L . L ; 7003 117TH PLAGE NE KIKKLAND, W.H. 98033 22604 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION To: File S-2003-155 From: c�m-' C? CA _ _ -:A� o 0 Star Campbell, Planner Date: April 9, 2004 File: S-2003-155 Applicant: Serena Construction, LLC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................2 A. Application...............................................................................................................................................2 B. Decision................................................................................................................................................... 2 H. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS...................................................................3 A. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance........................................................................................... 3 C. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan............................................................................................... 4 D. Compliance. with the Zoning Code...................................................................... E. Compliance with the Flood Plain Management Provisions ...................................................................... 6 F. Environmental Assessment: ............................................................................................................. 0 ....... 7 G. Critical Areas Review: ................ 0 ............................................................................................................ 7 H. Comments: ................................................................................................. o .............................................. 7 III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS...................................................................0......7 A. Request for Reconsideration.................................................................................................................... 7 B. Appeals.................................................................................................................................................... 7 C. Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals......................................................................................... 8 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL.....................................................................................................8 V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR..................................................................................8 VI. APPENDICES.....................................................................................................................8 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD.............................................................................................6........8 Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 2 of 8 I. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to subdivide what is currently one lot at 10611 226th St. SW. This lot is in a single-family (RS-12) zone that allows lots with a minimum area of 12,000 square feet. The gross area of the subject lot is 40,483 square feet but there is a 20' wide access easement on the north portion. Access easements must be subtracted from the gross area to determine the net or developable area. When the area for this easement is subtracted, the developable area of the lot is 36,021 square feet. The applicant has demonstrated the ability to subdivide the existing lot into three lots that are all at least 12,000 square in area (Attachment 6). However, because the configuration for which the applicant seeks approval (Attachment 5) results in lots that are less 12,000 in area, the proposal includes requests to modify the lot area of the three proposed lots. A. Application 1. AApnlicant: Serena Construction LLC. 2. Site Location: 10611 220h St. SW (see Attachment 1). 3. Request: To divide a lot with approximately 1 acre into 3 lots in a Single -Family Residential RS-12 zone (see Attachment 2). 4. Review Process: Following the Comment Period, Planning Staff makes an administrative decision. 5. Major Issues: a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030, site development standards for the RS-12 zone. b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Title 18, public works requirements. c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.15B, Critical Areas. d. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.75, subdivision requirements. e. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.95, staff review requirements. B. Decision Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, and Attachments submitted with the application and during the comment period, the following is the recommendation of the City of Edmonds Planning Division: The Subdivision should be APPROVED with the following conditions: 1. Prior to recording the applicant must complete the following requirements: a) Civil plans must be approved prior to recording. In completing the civil plans you must address the following: (1) Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required prior to Recording" on Attachment 3. b) Trees that are not hazards as determined by the Planning Department or required to be removed as part of required plat improvements shall be left in place during the subdivision process. Trees may later be removed by individual property owners upon submittal of a development plan that demonstrates the need to remove the trees. c) Submit copies of the recording documents to the City for approval. These documents shall have the following information included: StaffReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report II. Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 3 of 8 (1) Add to the face of the Plat "Conditions of approval must be met and can be found in the final approval for the short subdivision located in File S-2003- 155." (2) Include on the plat all required information, including owner's certification, hold harmless agreement, and staff s approval block. (Applicants are now responsible for recording their own documents once they have been approved.) 2. After recording the plat, the applicant must complete the following: a) Provide the City Planning Division with two copies of the recorded plat, with the recording number written on them. b) Complete the Engineering Division conditions listed "Required with Building Permit" on Attachment 3. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS A. Compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance 1. Lot and Street Layout a. This criteria requires staff to find that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the dimensional requirements of the zoning ordinance and also that the lots will each contain usable building areas. Based on a review of the project and the analysis in this section staff agrees that a three lot short -plat is a reasonable use of the property. b. Lot sizes and dimensions: Required Proposed Proposed Reg. Lot Proposed Lot Area Net sq. ft Gross sq. ft Width Lot Width Lot 1 12,000 11,683 11,683 80' ±80 Lot 2 12,000 10,651 14,223 80' ±80 Lot 3 12,000 11,208 11,208 80' ±80 C. Setbacks: Setbacks should be as follows: Lot 1: Street Setbacks (25 feet): Side Setbacks (10 feet): Rear Setback (25 feet): Lot 2: Side Setbacks (10 feet): Lot 3: Street Setbacks (25 feet): Side Setbacks (10 feet): Rear Setback (25 feet): From the south property line From the east and west property lines From the north / northeast property line From all property lines including the access easement line From the south property line From the east and west property lines From the north / northwest property line d. Comer Lots: None of the lots are considered Comer Lots. e. Flag or Interior lot determination: Lot 2 is considered an Interior Lot. f. Lot Coverage of Existing Buildings on Proposed Lots: 1.) 35% maximum lot coverage is allowed in the RS-12 zone. 2.) Any buildings or structures on the new lots will be allowed to cover no more than 35% of the lot. StaffReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 4 of 8 2. Dedications a. There are no dedications required for the proposal. 3. Improvements a. See Engineering Requirements (Attachment 3). 4. Flood Plain Management a. This project is not in a FEMA designated Flood Plain. B. Analysis of Requested Modifications 1. The applicant has requested modifications to reduce the proposed lots from 12,000 to 11,683 square feet for lot 1, 10,651 square feet for lot 2, and 11,208 square feet for lot 3. The ability to request modifications is established by ECDC 20.75.075, which requires all criteria of a variance to be met if the requested modification is to be approved. The Criteria are as follows: a. Special Circumstances: That, because of special circumstances relating to the property, strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. Special Circumstances should not be predicated upon any factor personal to the owner such as age or disability, extra expense which may be necessary to comply with the zoning ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to make more profitable use of the property, nor any factor resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of the same property. b. Special Privilege: That the approval of the variance would not be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. c. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance: That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and the zoning district in which the property is located. d. Not Detrimental: That the variance as approved or conditionally approved will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and the same zone. e. Minimum Variance: That the approved variance is the minimum necessary to allow the owner the rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. 2. The Applicant has presented declarations as to the merits of the proposal (see Attachment 2). 3. Additional Findings: a. The city of Edmonds is able to accommodate additional growth through ill development. Certain lots are large enough to develop but, because of shape or orientation, require some modifications in order for the subdivision to be designed with a desirable lot layout. b. The subject lot is narrower than it is deep with a width of about 180 feet that runs along 226 h St. SW. StaffReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report c. The applicant has demonstrated that it is possible to create three lots that meet the minimum lot area requirement by submitting two alternative layouts with lots that are all at least 12,000 square feet in area. See Attachment 6. These layouts, however, are less desirable than the proposed layout because they either create odd shaped lots or unusable portions of lots or create a situation where more than one access road is necessary. d. The City has approved modification requests in similar situations. e. The subject property is in somewhat of a unique location. Refer to the zoning and vicinity map (Attachment 10). The property is within a small area zoned RS-12 that is bound by the City of Woodway, to the west and south, which allows for much larger lots. Edmonds Way (SR-104) to the east / northeast is separated from this zone. by a narrow strip of the Community Business zone. To the south of 226h St., east of the Woodway city limits, is an RS-8 zone that allows for lot areas with a minimum of 8,000 square feet. There appears to be a few potentially subdividable properties to the west of the subject property. There are only.a couple of recent subdivisions within this RS-12 zone and they did not request modifications to lot area. For these reasons, it is hard to compare the subject property to properties in the immediate vicinity. However, outside of the immediate vicinity, the City has approved modification requests in similar situations within the single-family residential (SR- 12) zone. Further, if there was a similar request, in the immediate vicinity, it would not be held to different standards than this request. f. The applicant has stated additional reasons for the proposed layout that center around the ability to design the subdivision with an interior courtyard concept. This design is such that the garage entrances lead from the turnaround and the lots are configured to accommodate the anticipated design of custom, rambler style houses (See Attachment 2). The applicant also states that this design will allow for more privacy and sense of identity, the orientation of the houses for better sun exposure, and the ability to create an overall landscape design. 4. Conclusions: a. The special circumstance relating to this property is related to the current lot's width and orientation to 226`s St. SW. Also, the applicant has demonstrated that the lot has adequate size to subdivide into three lots. b. Allowing the proposed lot layout would not be a special privilege for the property owner. As pointed out above, there are alternative layouts that could be used to subdivide the property into three lots. The property owner will not gain an additional lot by the proposal. The City has approved modification requests in similar situations and would not hold a similar proposal to different standards in the future. c. The proposal will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance. This is addressed in below sections II.B. and II.C. of the staff report. d. The modification will not be detrimental. The proposal should allow the construction of three high quality custom homes. This is consistent with the way the surrounding neighborhood is developed. The proposed layout decreases the detriment to the surrounding neighborhood since it minimizes the number of lots and driveways that access directly onto 226`h St. SW. e. Slight alterations to the interior lot lines of the proposal could increase the area of one lot and decrease the area of another. However, with a lot layout that includes a private road tract to provide access to each lot, the overall net area of the three proposed lots is going to be the same: The applicant has designed the access road to take up the minimum amount of area possible while still providing acess to the three lots and meeting the minimum width and turn- around radius requirements. Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 6 of 8 C. Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan 1. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies: The Comprehensive Plan has a section that addresses residential development and the following goals and policies have been taken directly from that section: a. Goal. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. The options available to the City to influence the quality of housing for all citizens should be approached realistically in balancing economic and aesthetic consideration, in accordance with the following policies: 1.) Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with the surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. 2.) Protect neighborhoods from incompatible additions to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structures in the area. 3.) Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction or additions to existing structures. 4.) Support retention and rehabilitation of older housing within Edmonds whenever it is economically feasible. 5.) Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses through the careful control of other types of development and expansion based upon the following principles: 6.) Residential privacy is a fundamental protection to be upheld by local government. 7.) Traffic not directly accessing residences in a neighborhood must be discouraged. 8.) Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traffic or land use encroachments. 9.) Private property must be protected from adverse environmental impacts of development including noise, drainage, traffic, slides, etc. 10.) Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, vegetation and drainage. 2. Compliance with the Residential Development goals and policies: There are not any aspects of the proposal that seem contrary to the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It appears that high quality homes that fit into the neighborhood will ultimately be constructed on the property. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. D. Compliance with the Zoning Code 1. Staff finds this project to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code, particularly the Subdivision regulations, and the development standards of the zone as detailed see section II.A.2.b. E. Compliance with the Flood Plain Management Provisions 1. The proposed project is not in a Flood Plain. StafiReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 7 of 8 F. Environmental Assessment: 1. Is this site identified on the City's Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? No. 2. Is an Environmental Checklist Required for this application? If more than 500 cubic yards of grading will be required, an Environmental Checklist is required. At this point in time, the total amount of grading for the subdivision is not anticipated to exceed 500 cubic yards. If through the review of the civil plans, it is determined that more than 500 cubic yards of grading will be required, the City will require an Environmental Checklist to be submitted and issue an Environmental Determination. G. Critical Areas Review: 1. Critical Areas Review number: 2. Results of Critical Areas Review: areas as defined by ECDC 20.15B. was issued. H. Comments: CA-2003-143. The property does not appear to contain any critical As a result, a waiver from the requirement to complete a study The following comments are from the comment period: Letter from Jan and Gary Ostlund, dated 2/22/04. This letter requests that the City deny the modification requests because the subdivision would result in lots that are smaller than surrounding lots and that there is no hardship to justify the request. 2. Letter from Brian and Ruth Alvensleben, dated 1/4/04. This letter requests that the City not allow any further density than what is already allowed by the RS-12 zone. III. RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsiderations and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010.G allows for City staff to reconsider their decision if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the posting of the notice required by this section. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. B. Appeals Section 20.105.040 and 20.105.020 describes how appeals of a staff decision shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision being appealed. StaffReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report Serena Construction LLC File No. S-2003-155 Page 8 of 8 C. Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals The time limits for Reconsiderations and Appeals run concurrently. If a request for a reconsideration is filed before the time limit for filing an appeal has expired, the time "clock" for filing an appeal is stopped until a. decision on the reconsideration request is completed. Once the staff has issued his/her decision on the reconsideration request, the time clock for filing an appeal continued from the point it was stopped. For example, if a request is filed on day 5 of the appeal period, an individual would have 9 more days in which to file an appeal after the staff issues their decision on the reconsideration request. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.075.100 states, "Approval of a preliminary plat or preliminary short plat shall expire and have no further validity at the end of five years, unless the applicant has acquired final plat or final short plat approval within the five-year period." V. NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the staff request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office. VI. APPENDICES Attachments: 1. Vicinity / Zoning Map 2. Applicant Letters 3. Engineering Requirements 4. Public Comment Letters 5. Proposed Lot Layout 6. Alternative Lot Configurations VII. PARTIES OF RECORD Larry Deisher Jan Ostlund Brian and Ruth Alvensleben Land Planning Northwest 22604 106`" Ave. W. 10519 226' St. SW 1523 Tenth Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Marysville, WA 98270 Serena Construction Company, LLC Engineering Department 7003 117" Pl. NE Fire Department Kirkland, WA 98033 Parks Department Public Works Department Planning Department StaffReport / January 12,2001 / Staff Report 10 • .t.2}f- t-r - 60• 22100 * "i f t ib - 22115 - s k . 1226 1224 12 f2 12 12 _ - .. 1230 1231 _ 611 621 631 1- '.W - + 7 1240 .-. > 1240 Y - sv.• r 1250 V=- 1251 - r rz CO V) 0 0 1 10925 541 36 1291 1790 • `� .t �.. t -• • 10829-:.. •. 1331 a 1291 i 115 •. •.:'.. _ -. , . .V �� .. j , -. a ... J1� , • - 546 7 1330 1350 1350 S 329 ¢i " 1345 631 •,• ••�.. �^10901 : 10605 1 01 f0519 f013 41010 11930 10615 f07z1 - - f0708' - f0624 226" - - 22604 2606 4 Tii f0415. fW d o 00vvcry,."'. 22615 2261Q. 226TH PL 22623 22624 i 10816 22625 a 22631 2630 22631 . - '22701. 22628 22703 2704 - 22703 22711 2712 22711' - 2714 22711 - 22719 2720 _ 22719 71008 09is 22725 - �22729 2728. . - - - - __ -—_'.22724..'_ 22729 _bp •_ 1 ' 1078/ 10712 22808 22807 22710 22817 22821 22820 CO 22821 22820 L•.M _ 22831 228" V60 22831 22830 . • ..,. - , QR - 22905 10707 10631 f0815 - GeR _ 10W2 106os • -0717 22915 ,.. RM 3 �. ,...: 10704 R,lo— .-.22gp1 . � Zoning and Vicinity Map W :. 7f0,; > . . 728 Q 1225 712 724. . .739 . 1229 •171I: 233" . 7237 222 BIRCH PL 14 241 710 712 1234 7 700 1250 t� . 700 704 1260 1281 697. 715 719" 707 91 13 704 720 708: 722. . ro 749 753•'' 7 W7 7U 14TH vw sw 740 Ise 2 14TH wv sw . 728 724 720 727 - 65 723 717 w' 1 11 V, . 0 724 728: . 710 D. Z_ 721... 4w 1508 )6 724 22910 .1 229f2 \ \ 22915 ' 22920 ATTACHMENT 1 .1523 TENTH STREET MARYSVILLE, WASHINGTON 9827( (425) 339-1302 (360) 659-7718 FAX tV N I N G IV O R T HW t= LAND USA GOfVSUI_T 1 IVG S�i2�/ I GES RECEIVED September 25, 2003 SEr 2 5 2003 DEVELOPMEIIT SERVICES Mr. Steve Bullock, Senior Planner City of Edmonds Planning and Development Services City Hall, 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington RE: SERENA CONSTRUCTION SHORT SUBDIVISION VARAIANCE REQUEST. Steve: The following justification statements are made on behalf of the request: 1. Physical constraint of the properties narrow width on 226d' dictate the use of a private road to serve at least two of the proposed lots. Since the property is over 36,000 sq. ft., three lots are allowable based on the current zoning of R-12,000. Numerous design options were considered which, although they meet the prescription of the code, create unusable shapes and spaces. 2. The vast majority of lots in the immediate vicinity are divided to their smallest size, and therefore are not comparable to the instant case. The few which are large enough for further division have different shapes and do not possess similar circumstances. No special privilege is being provided this applicant do to these circumstances. 7l ATTACHMENT 2 — 2 — September 25, 2003 3. The subject parcel is designated single family residential by the adopted comprehensive plan for the city and the implementing zone category for the area is R12,000." Therefore, the applicant proposes a subdivision of lots consistent with both existing zoning and comprehensive plan. 4. The applicant's parcel contains 40,483 square feet which is over the minimum zoning by 4,483 square feet for the creation of three (3) lots. Therefore lot size is consistent with the intent and purpose of the zoning code of Edmonds. 5. The lot configuration proposed by the applicant reflects a design concept which will provide for the innovative use of the subject parcel and will maintain consistency with property values in the immediate area. In fact the type of homes contemplated by the applicant will increase property values for several of the neighboring parcels. 6. We have attached a design alternative which meets the requirements of the short subdivision and zoning ordinances. However, the northerly appendage of proposed lot 1 provides an illogical and non-functional parcel which is detrimental to the overall design concept and contemplated lot values. RECEIVE® 1 52 3 TENTH STREET MARY5VIL-E, WASHINGTON 98270 (425) 339— 1 302 DEC 16 2003 (360) 659-7718 FAX DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PL_.o.IVIV I fVG ND�THWEST L►AI�4r_> USE= GOIVSULT I "Ca SEIR�/ I GES December 16, 2003 Mr. Steve Bullock, Senior Planner City of Edmonds Planning and Development Services City Hall, 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington RE: SERENA CONSTRUCTION SHORT SUBDIVISION VARAIANCE REQUEST Steve: The following information is submitted based on your request for additional justification as to the need for the internalized design concept. Enclosed as attachment A is a 1 "=20' scale drawing showing proposed foot prints of the actual buildings. As you will note, the interior court yard concept with garage entrances leading from the ends of the "T" turn around provide a significant privacy factor. There are additional reasons that this proposed design is a significant improvement over the traditional design concept. We are also enclosing another drawing that represents the parcel created in three lots with a more traditional approach. These lots meet the minimum code requirements for lot width and area, but have no sense of identity. Some of the factors which are benefits to our proposed lay -out are: Serena Varaince Letter. Page 2 1. A single access point onto 226' thereby creating a better traffic safety condition. 2.•• House placement that orients to a better sun exposure for internal home living spaces. 3. A privacy factor unobtainable by conventional design. 4. Higher overall property values due to the clustering concept and neighborhood identity factor. 5. Commonality of design in terms of design, building materials, color schemes and street scape. 6. Ability to create and install an overall landscape design to fit the clustering concept. 7. Joint use and initial expense of installation of storm drainage, sanitary sewer service, water service and electrical/communication. We hope this supplemental information will aid you in the processing of our variance request, and if we may be of further assistance as to the interpretation of this letter, please call at your earliest convenience. Respectfully, `.`O y D. Deisher Cc: Serena Construction, Inc. m ME TAL •• �� FENCE Is —- oW 0.5 E OF PROP. LAB 2 f-T �iE�7452637 X — S LINE, N. 85'. E I/2, sj HULOCK `� SEMEN 2. NW I/q. SW va. F + UNC!I=K Al NO, I SW VA SEC. 25-27-3 LOCK FEWAOC S FENCE M43LE PT. PSHOILOD., IS U t OF /F PROP. \ 24" HULOCK 6 5 Q. FT. . 24' FEIL • 1 %PLCIX 12,6* HEMLOCK /18O E FENCE IS ON PROP. LM Iz PPE 0 HEMLOCK N N LL1 3 sq8 PROP. GLINEu' It HE OCKCEDAR /o Jim IN Ts .45.71 MT CEDAR X 15' CEDAR L 12 FT 24�R�J . •�. ' :�.`: PIS: 1'� JB• FfhLO[;K I PU•E k : �[T`• •��: • 14• FIEJ .,.10'.. LSJCK•;:' le, FIR IT .�'� �, 0 HEMLOCVF K l6 12HEy� 14 ' LOUc ppc' �:.� ? •'�-: 14• PILE ,le' PM �• IElLoac 178.68' v SD Tq -T .... :1: i�. vegt :�. ►: 2.fi' lE • 5 (P1 . 5 ]I l ...... RCP �' ?` !E r. 5k N 2 iME/�Sl: :S:::: :SS: .. :5 ..................::.:.: CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS Name: Serena File No.:. S-03455: Approved bys Vicinity: 10611 226`h St SW Engineering Program Manager date ` Req'd Req'd w/bldg 4 Bond poste Complete . - prior to Pei init c :recordin 1 Rights 6Pw—ay-19r public streets .X 2, Easements(Cityutilities,.prrvate':aecess;gther utilities) Provide all easements as needed. X 3, Street improvements,( A. P.with curb and gutter): Install 18" concrete curb and gutter along property frontage. X Slope of proposed private access shall not exceed 14% X Widen Westbound travel lane on 226`s St SW, along the X property frontage, to 11.0' measured from the road centerline. 4. Street: -turnaround:.;'.:.. Provide on -site turn around on private access road to City Stds. X 5. Sidewalks and /or:wa.lkways ;;, Install 5' wide concrete sidewalks along roe frontage X 6. Street. lights:::..: N/A X 7. Planting strip: _ . N/A X 8... Water system improvements,(,pipelines; fire hydrants, pump .. stations, telemeterin ,•:D-.S"H:S :etc :.OVWSD. Developer must enter into an Extension agreement with X Olympic View Water and Sewer District Provide service to each lot. X Connect to public waters stem X X 9. Sanitary sewer.system improvements (pipelines,`pump. Stations; telemeferin -health district, etc.:OVWSD Developer must enter into an Extension agreement with X Olympic View Water and Sewer District. Provide new service to each lot X Connect to public sewers stem X X 10. Storm sewer. system:improvements,(pipelines, pump Stations, DOE, 6sheries,:etc::..:. Provide storm sewer service to all proposed lots. X Construct storm detention system sized to provide adequate X capacity for proposed single family dwellings and access improvements in accordance with ECDC 18.30. Connect to Public Storms stem X 11. On -site drainage (plan;per Or.d. 3013):::. Connect all new im ervious surfaces to detentions stem. X X 12. Underground wiring (per Ord;_ 1387) :.:. Required for all new services X X 13. Excavation and` radin er:UBC Chapter 70:- Submit a grading plan as part of engineered site plan. X X 14: Si na a(per .City, En ineer Provide fire and aid address signage X VAdvrw\sp\03-155serenap1t.doc ATTACHMENT 3 Req'd'p nor to: Req'd w ' /bldg. Bond; Complete . recordm Permit'; osted 15. Survey mopumentation:(per Ord., Section`12.10 120) , N/A X. lti As=built.draw�ngs,(per City Etigineer)... Required for all utility construction. X X 11. -Other requirements All proposed lots shall access the private access road X X Install "Access Road ends" X Install high intensity "stop sign" X 18. Engineering: ees:, ....`. ,.... a) Storm drainage connection charge per lot ($428) X b) Sewer connection charge/LID fees to be paid in full. X c) Plat inspection fee: 2.2% of improvement costs X d) Plan review fee: $860 $ 860 X e Traffic mitigation: $200 per pm peak trip $ X ENGINEERING PROGRAM MANAGER, CITY OF EDMONDS DATE The Engineering requirements have been completed and the subdivision can be recorded Authorized for recording by: Date: V:\dvrw\sp\03-155 serena plt.doc January 4, 2004 Attn: Star Campbell City of Edmonds Development Services 121 5 h Ave North Edmonds, WA. 98020 RE: 10611 226th St. SW, Edmonds We are neighbors of. the proposed modification and feel very strongly that the City of Edmonds should not_ allow any further density than what is allowed with the current. zoning... Adhering. to the RS-12. would still.. allow two homes to be built where there is currently only one. Maintaining a good quality of life,. respecting- aesthetics and. the environment; and not adding, to the already increased- daily congestion on 22e St. SW are all very serious concerns. Edmonds. needs to pay attention to the issues its residents are facingwhen lookingat. increasing: the number of homes -.built in this neighborhood and adhere* to: the zoning that is already in. place. Sincerely, - Rriari .&Rutll.Alvensjeben 10519 226t'' St SW Edmonds,WA 98020 ATTACHMENT 4 February 22, 2004 Star Campbell City of Edmonds Department of Developmental Services 121 — 5's Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: File #S-03-155 Dear Ms. Campbell; neciel v �, eD M ? 2004 ITRM/r COUNTER As regards the above file number, I request that the variance in question not be granted for the following reasons: 1) It would result in home sites inconsistent and inappropriate with the surrounding lots where there are hones on undividable one -acre lots to the south and homes on two or more acres to the west. To the north and east, the homes are on code -size or larger lots. 2) Unless there is a hardship preventing the builder from following the city codes for lot size, the codes, which were established to maintain order and prevent random building practices, should be enforced. From the information I have read, there appears to be no hardship which prevents the builder from adhering to the code as written. Should this variance be granted, I would strongly urge the city to enforce its code for maximum lot coverage of 35%. I believe codes such as these were written in order to maintain adequate open space which is so necessary for quality of life, but which is rapidly disappearing. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, �.1AAA, 0,_iwa4 . Jan Osdund 22604 — 1060' Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98020 PS — We had a conversation regarding the fact that we have not received mailings for this particular variance request because the term "No mail" was beside our names on your mailing list. As per your recommendation, I called the Snohomish County Assessor's office and there is no such designation on their roles. Please cross out the "No mail" on your list and send us any future mailings. Thank you. J Q-E&wj 5ER m PRELIMINAR IN CITY O SEG. 25, T LEGEND " O Fro MON. IN CASE O SANITARY SEWER MH . OO POAER TRANSFrU4ER iF 1°3 CABLE RISER ® W CAELEJJJCTIDNBW: N YN� a TELEPHONE RISER O UTD-[TY PGIE F— GUY AN>M C ® WATER METER WATER VALVE to 1 PAL BOX CATCH BASIN -SS- SANITARY ..EWER - sD- STOW DRAIN TL 3.m — W — WATER LDE PANT MARK — T TELEPrOPE PAM MARK —G T P C — JOM UTLrrY PANT MAFK G"GAS, T•TELEPhOE P C-CABLE —o—°_ —o— WOOD FO-CE OVER}fAU POWER LIE EDGE OF GRAVEL TKAGKING NO. 5-03-155 IZEV15ION DATE: JAN. 9, 20046"TRUCT PIJ aET I ON JAN. 26, 2004 ')0U1 , 5 Iz 5m)TV 15` vii EDMOND5, WA5HIN6TON IWN5HIP 27 NORTH, PAN6E.3 EA5T, W.M. / 10615 1 06 0 q WOODWAY _ TL 3-096 PA ASWI_T -iB¢ SITE. H W. E:V2 •:::'•S'` 20 FT , EDMOND5 MAIN 5TIZ ET FOR I AL PARK a+ 220TH ST, SW PRAIEOT SITE 224TH 5T• SW ACCESS E SEME 5 VZN+r«rL/. y ° Tr1°L M V I G I N I TY MAP e ° UNDER AF N0, 1 82637 smVES!r DALE: I' - I,OW* ^ e oaf Fr. a e,m ear s/ NOTES Y p U LITILTr ES AND/OP UWROVET£IJTS NCH MAY EAST LINDEX mfp OR x •ate u ^ AkE NOT VSO-E MAY NOT BE '?IU•N CN THIS MAP 223 SQ. FT . a TFC5 Ri0°ERri CINTAM QL. SO. FT. OR a921, E5 7A,r�• s'e,m, ( , i ::. it . i W � 10,6 1 50.FT. (NET) IEB• VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED ° 9 PROPOSED 5FR BENCHMARK p¢a.•e.ax \ _ - Tlp((� S.F.R. A. J TL 3-099 I O607 OFLCONCRETE DMON. INION OF 5.00 CCASED ATT0SOUTHWEST�COR P 10708 1 0 6 2 4 APPLICANT: SERENA CONSTRUCTION GO 7003 117TH PLACE NE KIRKLAND, WASH. 98033 NOTES: 425-531-1334 I. ALL SLOPES ARE LESS THAN SURVEYOR: 5UWI T SURVEYING, INC. 15Y 12606 82ND AVE. NE 2. THERE ARE CRITICAL AREAS KIRKLAND, WASH. 98034 5GLF-r w AS DEFINED Y EMIG 425-614-8487 3. 517E 15 LOG TED IN5IPC 20 0 20 40 EXISTIN6 U6 BOUNDARY (EDMOND5) ENGINEER: THEJAY 6ROLIP, ANC. 4. NO DUPLEXES PROPOSED. GONTOURb:2 FT. INTERVAL 5. TWO CAR 6A GE5.OFF-STREET PARKING MARYSVILLE WASH. 9B27O FOR TWO GAR MIN. PER LOT. 360-659-81�9 OF SECTION 2S-27-3 SITE 13ENCHMAW ®r SET SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF UTILITY POLE 30' SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER_ BASIS OF BEARING PLAT OF WESTGATE ESTATES. VOL 20, PAGE 121. HELD PLAT BEARING OF N 01 09. 52"E BETWEEN MONUMENTS FND. ALG. 106TH AVE. W. AS SHOWN. DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION TOTAL LAND AREA : 40,483 50.FT. ( .93 AG.) AREA OF ROADWAY.3,369 5Q.FT.* 3,752 SQ.FT. EASE) TOTAL ROAD LENGTH: 150 LIN. FEET NET DEVELOPMENT AREA: 34,021 50,FT,(0.63 AC.) AREA OFJLOT5: 33 542 SQ.FT. PERCENT RD. TO TOTAL AREA: Il% EXI5TINd ZONING: R-.12 PROP015ED ZONIN6: K-12 POWER SUPPLY: 5NOHOMI51-1 COUNTY P.U.D. NO I WATER 5UrPLY: CITY OF EDMONDS SEWER SERVICE: OLYW IG VIEW WATER/5EWER DI5T. 6R055 DEV. DENSITY: 3.23 D.U.'5/ACRE NET DEV.,DENSITY: 3.61 D.U.'5 / ACRE AVERAGE LOT 51ZE: 13,494 5Q. FT.(GR055) 5MALLE5T LOT 51ZE 10,651 5Q• FT. NO. OF UNITS PROP05ED: 3 TOTAL AREA OPEN 5PAGE: -0- % TOTAL AREA OPEN 5PAGE: -0- 5GHOOL DISTRICT: EDMONDS NO. FIRE D15TIZIGT: SNOT-IOMISH COUNTY D15T, NO. PROP05ED LAND USE: 51N6LE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (DETACHED) LEGAL DESGRIFIT ION: I THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWL-5T QUARTER OF SECTION Z5, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EA5T, W.M. IN SNOHOMI5H GOLNrY, WA5HINGTON. EXCEPT THE EAST 150 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 65 FEET THEREOF: AND EXCEPT THE 50UTH 20 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. p 5ITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SN0HOMISH, STATE OF WA5HIN6TON PROPERTY ADDRE55: 10411 226TH STREET S.W. �9 W EDMOND5, WA5HIN6TON 98 8i Q TAX ACCT. NO. 270325-003-102-00 — Q PLANNER LAND PLANJING NORTHWEST ARRY D. DEISHER OWNER: 5E ENA CONSTRUCTION GO 1523'TENTH STREET 7003 117TH PLACE NE MARYSVILLE, WASH. 96270 KIRKLAND, WASH. 98033 IAlSNxaa - lane 41S-5,31-11'f4 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JA5ON T. WALKER P.O. BOX 1542 DWALL, WASH. 96019 II 425-766-8324 L.L.G1 ARCHITECT: NASH JONES ANDERSON i 11644 NE 80TH STREET KIRKLAND, WASH. 98033 425-828-1918 JOD N.. ___] 1667 SHT 1 OP I ATTACHMENT 5 FTO MON. IN CASE SANITARY SCAER MH POWER TRANSFORMER CABLE RISER CABLE JUNCTION BOX TELEPHONE RISER UTILITY POLE WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT 1 WATER VALVE MAIL BOX CATCH BASIN SANITARY SEWER TL 3-103 STORM FAIN WATER LINE PANT MARK TELEPHONE PAINT MARK JOINT UTILITY PAINT MARK I G=GAS. T=TELEPHONE P=POWER CABLE o' ' ° ° 88 I 5 3 W V;r E 5 �. _ ���. F_ OF � k llvE N. ice'. E 1/2. �, • . ••.• , •,� E SEMENI� S vz NW va. SW v4 � � � � �' UNDER AF NO . 1 2637 sw va, sEc zs-z�-s.Es 1 !t ►PJILOOC ��� 4� MALE PT./ E OF LK 9YH94= S ,a CEDAR �F 24* HDL= 16,2 6 50 . FT CGR K. ) 1 2, 5 FT (NET) :: N..�, IT HEMLOCK grMMOCK C FEPLCCX FE]LOOG \ q7 —FETCE — — �--� PROP. PPS r�iuooc ¢' ►QLocx �- i ,^ r W ►EMOM N0....... 3 - TL 3 099 EXISTING S.F.R. 81_ 6" -- -- CARPORT:. .. PAVING IS I . 2Z W. OF PROP LINE PAVING IS 2Z W. OF PROP LNE .�......... g 12, 002 50. FT.,� :::::�i^: gr — .'.'.'.....' PAVPG CROSSES $,t7,CK PROP UE ........... .......... �M io r ffi• POE � :•:•?I-:-3 �:•::::: 12.� rOpC,. 727.::::... �Z- CEDAR Zee HE LDCK ILI Wj �� T CEDAR `^w 14,i�4.��SQ.FT.(GR.T. L 12.005 FT,(NET) — 7 r yr. 0212• _- u. ATTACHMENT 6 Ulf z c 20 FT. AGGE55 EASEMENT UNDER AF NO. 1362637 226TF1 STREET 5 W, . I . .. . . ! . . . I I . I I f CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORK ADDRESS—c/ "__5­ OWNER APPROVED ®AT AP AT BLDG, OFFICIAL__ ell------------------------------ ---------------- --------- : - APPROVED AS NOTED BY EN-GINEER 120 Date- th 6 1 g:go I , APPROVED BY PLANNING 41010s r1 -EXISTING AIL BOX CLUSTER TO BE REPLACED WITH NE STACKINGUNIT ly 3: cla CIA EXISTING DRIVEWAY LOCATION I ENTRY MONW-1ENT WALLS %E ANC) 111ONAC (SEE ELEVA N SWEET L -2) —NEW ASPHAI APRON - UT. POLE NEW 12 " cULv%. f To WIDEN ENTS 51-&" WT. MAS014RT COLUMN AT 9't O.C. ALONG ENTRY (TYP.) .5' WT. ORNAMENTAL IR FENCE INFILLABE COLUMNS (TYP-)TWEEN RECEIVED i Nov 3 0 2004 PERMIT COUNTER !C!%/F��.- IF, EDMONDS )EPARTME N71 LA !` DDRE ! l ®1PlN E � PPROVED AT BLDG. ;.�.FFIOt FPF-1RbWb1rT l Z'0 0 . Q. 00 TMM$ AT EN DEAD. TREED 4T ENTRY (TTPj `/ �� ► �'WPI WORK® ADDRESS OWNER — APPROVED DATE: BLDG.OFFICI NUMB R IJMB t 0 LONCEPNAL ENiRT MR.l@lT ELEV4ilON _ _ . z � EGSLE y• , p H�POBED OKN 4p LOW LAYOUT AND PAVEMENT GENSRAL MOM �ncR ;rrw a em awNr�awm p1��aia�i.W' � bw�� etl�YewJ Mesisinearwia maror t.m. A„IrV *Fence must be located on private property. •Property owner responsible for determinin rare- .LL PE°A1R6 TO iBE i OBT.°gp BT 0J1'ER OR d I CA b ��E9T.TE R310E property lines. *Fence shall not enclose or prevent access to any �0 EMY PLANNING RECEIVE D Citymaintained utilities. �j G� . f APPROVED AS NOTED SEP 112004 BY GINEERING 4:r_ W,Qmavjl UY�'� �°®�v PERMIT COUNTER Date: R.�2� ,f:;dtio QrkmWdA -4�A= w gaga C. 2 (L 0�Q0 gZZ7 WyUW° 7 w o: IL Z LL_O__ U Z O aZ Z W < (n R� REvSo"ar — L-2 HARDSCAPE PLAN ! Ilucre Qoco �..•,�. � _ •.m f a. POLE I Fe�i_6 ._ ESTATEeeTes - b 0 i . •1 --- '+ �I I CLUSTER CLUSTER a Sox L:�d>ew a�ddt ch.•CLUSTERTO BEWi Cmtervrort+l NIT 4 Pr eta L t4i ' a. mow rxpac J' N g .a£R" 7 .✓:erA z Y x n i 7- Z _ 9 p O p � 4 +Y • ..agOg1 R1 9 '- ____ LOGF ICN I LL. I/I ._... u (SEE T Lzl '!Y,� T ' _ r j�°' v:.Y'S'j y:,7{ f•-e. I e� _ _ _ � -0' � i diEE QtWT Tr . ks••:. • /' q raFeED" �, OP.T70'Lti �. AN P/ r / �0-eao 3 <�r�x I' — Re+RacTmrE _ 6ATE'AT_VV mu AOPKOLT fn; .v \' ® O wTw LiCiwT cuma8 rTTPJ r-� o APRON z o 0. POLE M.,,.S N �J r ry i f T4� f /J �ryiz I ooLrNArn oc aLa+� AT 12 mrJ nensioN is., 3* i�+?, fiyT �x�r�sF�s,•` �'r,<� � � �,F,:.,�.�T`§��•J}tt��. �"�fq��'�✓��k•�: j o To AEtXREA Tim FDCE v 3';r''� C� .EmLmPrt, Y d 0� —72� O a&ROJIDED FOR cONCEPTUAi- USE MT1-1-' ACTOR TO FIELD YERFY ALL AREAD. ... ._ . .. _.. _ .._ _-._..... ___.. _. GRADED AM DMEWIONt! CH SITE _ _ _.._ _.. _.._ .. _. _ _—.._. _.. _. _ _ — 'ys y� - - - - - - -- - HARDY PLAN APPROVE®--A0--1VOTED- . _ . R E C 1 `/ E p @Fenc must be located on private property. BY E NEERI Property owner responsible for determining Olaf SEP 13 2004 property lines. Fence shall not enclose or prevent access to any Date: City maintained utilities. PERMIT COUNTER LEGEND EXIS G 1;-;v.,�3 STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) So {_•.)SE, SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) d FND MON. IN CASE FND PROPERTY CORNER, AS NOTED (JUNE 2003) _.._.._____ iy _._........._.._ WATER - - S5 - --- c; --- SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAINAGE ----- 500---"'-------- CONTOURS FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) 0- POWER POLE GUY POLE Rj WATER METER t-I WATER VALVE WV �(r,iL, MAILBOX UTILITY POLE ANCHOR } UTILITY- POLE WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE v____-__..___.;�_._._____.._._;v. FENCE LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT INDEX CONTOURS PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 108.45' 65ZO2' 9'27 26" C2 18, 42' 20, 00' 50'5248" C3 23.81 ' 27.92' 48'51 '28" C4 20,78' 20,00' 59'49'10" C5 96.14' 455.35' 12'05'49" CALL 48 HO URS BEFORE YO U DIG 1-800-424-5555 SW 114, SW 114, SEC. 25, T. 2 7N. , R. 3E. , W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHING TON PROPOS D TL 3-101 rNr 1/2" REBAR do CAP MEYRING 2621" Q 0.27'N X0.40,E + OF PROP. COR. j a178.59' is.'.-- / N. 85', 1_• 'rr/2, 01 P si`l r' " FENCE TINGLE: \ cu \ v,, rj IS 0.2' E, OF PROP. UNI l \� o 00 RN(SH FLOOR=It 41&0 \ \ , BOTTOM OF FOOr�l3o , E^n. 5A�iTARY SE'!`,'0�i ?dit I I �Pi:;.P�P. 1?i! .•.ia�'r'' `. ce TWE 1e IF. _ ,`103.:Si-MAIN CHANNi`t_ ( I 1 i r .1c r �} PLACE INLET PROTECTION ![-0 S, OUT t!W to I N y>jK SACK INSIDE CATCH BASIN 12" AOS CUL VER r .E = 303.of ._FND 1/2" REBAR SET ! IN CONCRETE ✓ (HELD AS SUBD• COR.) � I r. r;1 N I j r ` DURING CONSTRUCTION_•.. ...... __...............f w 58 LF-B'P y , k { y I.._.._........ _. „ PIPE t4'0.0% r• ti f ., y ......... (TRENCH B') ; J TL 3-103 i II TRENCH 18" / { J OBSERVATION WELLS it 5 f ' 4 Al 4 10• WIDE SEWER EASEMENT PER SUPERIOR COURT I CAUSE NO. 93173 '-TRENCH A" 3�369 SO. FT. }I'DICE ANGLE PT. ; %PRNATE RD. TRACT 999 r (I //P,ROF:�INE�I 1 PrE O Q.0% WE:` le I rf tI / FND 1/2" RESAfl &CAP { { / 1_.:1 : PLACE INLET PROTECWN If /' [: .;a:. i'''= SACK INSIDE CATCN BASIN 'MEYRING 2621• (.ro ��_-. fU '1^ 'i5 ,NC (;ON57RBCRON 0.11' E OF PROP. COR.� If /i "•� 10 FND 1/2" VATHOUT CAP l C /A, -1 \ r } r `, a.DS' N CF PROP. •:i i f/'• /. _ /f .�!%' i L- - - N 88-18 27 - W 1 /8r68' iFr✓}lrSD'-1 f F / r �/ r f/i /%!� f` ✓f/' ;J T 7•n_��-- -�7— v - G - -. G _ __ ti: ---:LSD /i:!l;-! f� `/ � � �%f//l�'i;�/%,��%�,1�%' �,>��i��';�/.%� �%�!;%'':'f' • %,': !/ � /%%/� 7 .. �7,'777? r 'rrr,-� �', ;�.�.` �` �--'"`�1xAvr-''•- G o%i'`r rryt bl1.111 IE. = SO3.8C: M.A!N CHANNEL. ui IN E, IN S}V, OUT N r i/1 ! I UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: CAUTION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING U77UTIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE UTIL177ES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THIS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 1-800-424-5555 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW U77LITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF 3AID'URUTIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMATION AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIA770N. IF CONFLICTS SHOULD OCCUR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT JAY GROUP ENGINEERING INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 6 PP�1' I FND 1/2" TACK 1N CAPPED REBAR, LS NO. ILLEGIBLE f % 0.66'N X 0.20' W OF / PROP. COR. T L� `r TL 3-099 P.Ar(r4G IS 2.0• W. Of' PROF 1.1NE OF PROP I_ilv;A PAWN, "RO3S,S i'RG'P I.lNE TL 3-100 S 1; 2 I•IYf FND TACT( IN LEAD IN {.✓/, It 5Y{ ; %4, SEC. 21i-2'-3 CONC, MON IN CASE - I %. �/� 4':Xl;tr1� AR;' ti�Kfft kr1•! /" ?IM 515 50 ¢'r iE= 504.90^•MNN CHANNEL w 4 I'I E, OUT t4 4vt Q �o uj< oz 1n co 0 p 4 FND 2' BRASS DISK VnTH "X" 1N CONC.\ 1AO1J IN CASE d- PL 20' EASEMENT 2' 16' PAVEMENT PL " l MIN AG YAVtMtNI ` PAVEMENT COMPACTION 2'-5/8" CSTC 6" CONCRETE 4 "-1-1/4" CSBC EXTRUDED CURB RICE DENSITY SUBGRADE, BASE, TOP COURSE APPROVED SUBGRADE COMPACTION 95% (ASTM 1557) 1 PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE SEE EDMONDS STD DETAIL E-21.1 STA 0+21.46 8" PVC OBSERVATION WELL STA. 0+79.64 JoU C7uN, 0"- —, �G pi s Jal- G �C 8" PERF- PVC 58'f PLAN VIEW TRENCH "B 11 NOT TO SCALE -1F 1 F L-VV- nd 0 s, ftVPlzo V'Eb 7Cg_ CA -CS � Odn1 p'i�Ct�i� 4' i/\X /\ EL= 511.25 STA 1+38.55 8" PVC OBSERVATION WELL STA, 0+81.64 y79 }0 7ROW 1c. m 8" PERF. PVC 57'f PIAN VIEW TRENCH "A" NOT TO SCALE 6" CONCRETE EXTRUDED CURB %�— FILTER FABRIC (MIRIFI 10OX, \ TYPAR 3201, POLYFELT TS420 j\ OR EQUIVALENT) 100 YR W.S. EL=570.92 COMPACT TO 95% DENSITY _ \ NATIVE GROUND SECTION VIEW Z INFILTRATION TRENCH 4 NOT TO SCALE AOCEPTABLE MATERIAL TUNE SDR 35 SCH 40 �T! — 8102HANCOR Data: .. /WO4 1�vEs 6WSTtT4T6 ►yPI20VAL r- � r �-PL�rT �- 6f SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNERS OF ALL AFFECTED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS THEIR FACILITIES. Z SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. NATIVE MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACKRLL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING BACKFILL PLACEMENT.. J. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION. 4. SIDE SEWER STUBS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 21W LOCA77ON AT THE END MTH PORTION ABOVE GROUND PAINTED WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERS LABELED "SEWER" WITH DEPTH. T.V. AND PRESS TEST. 5 ALL 4" DIA. CLEANOU75 TO BE RAISED TO GRADE WITH CAST IRON FRAME AND GAVE (LOCKING TYPE). APPCiJVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION EXPIRES 11/30/2004 8" o PERFORATED PIPE ® 0.00l. 1 1/2"-3"N WASHED DRAIN ROCK W S SCALE: i "=1000' BASIS OF BEARING: PLAT OF WESTGATE ESTATES, VOL. 20, PAGE 121. HELD PLAT BEARING OF N O P09' 52" E BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND ALONG 106TH AVE. W., AS SHOWN. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED BENCHMARK HELD ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 500.00 FEET ON TOP OF CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25-27-3. TBM SITE BENCHMARK SET SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF UTILITY POLE +/- 30' SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER. ELEVATION = 514.81 ' 1 PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANT/CONTACT: SERENA CONSTRUCTION 7003 117TH PLACE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98033 (425) 531-1334 CIVIL ENGINEER; SURVEYOR: JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. SUMMIT SURVEYING, INC. 1927 5TH STREET 12628 82ND AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 (360) 659-8159 (425) 814-8487 FAX (360) 651-7252 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JASON T. WALKER P.0 BOX 1542 DUVALL, WA 98019 (425) 788-8326 ARCHITECT: PLANNER: NASH JONES ANDERSON LAND PLANNING NORTHWEST 11644 NE 80TH STREET LARRY D. DEISHER KIRKLAND, WA. 98033 1523 TENTH STREET (425) 828-1918 MARYSVILLE, WA. 98270 (425) 339-1302 NOTES 1) UTILITIES AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS WHICH MAY EXIST UNDERGROUND OR ARE NOT VISIBLE, MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS MAP. 2) THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS 40,483 SO. FT OR 0.93 ACRES. A (COP r LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 EXCEPT THE GEAST,E 3 FAST 150 FEET THEREOF 13 2 2pt4 AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. PERMIT COUNT BSITUATE IN. THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON SITE ADDRESS: 10611 226TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA. TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 270325-003-102-00 INITIALS I DATE 5W 114, SW 114, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. \ SERENA SATE PLAN AY ROUP REV. BY DATE PROJECT MANAGER SCALE SEM 05103104 BRK 1"=30' \ DRAWING FILENAME JGE J08 N0: NG1NE'ERING, INC. JO8S/03-0013/dwg/03-0013.dwg 03-0013 7 5774 STREET, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 SHEET 050) 65" 159 (360) 651.7252 FAX ROAD, DRAINAGE �c UTILITIES 1 ENG[NEER►NG@JAYGROUPLLC.COM of crTq SW 114, SW 1 /4, SEC. 25, T. 27N. , R. 3E. , W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON IiJ t=, iN `>W, ;711T N �9�;��',� � TBM tic i' _ • (I /"���,� I- � � r "� � , f f� t(i ;. I l +' 1 � !1 r ao GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft. 0 ti APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENCINEERIN Date: ..o' ►�`1 GENERAL NOTES: 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE - THE EXACT LOCATION(S) OF ALL THE UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID DAMAGE AND DISTURBANCE. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFIRM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND . ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS SITE. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK WITHIN THE SITE AND CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 6. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION HAS 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONCRETE (CP), NON -REINFORCED, ASTM C-14, CORRUGATED METAL 14 GA. GALVANIZED, ASPHALT COATED TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER, MEETING AASHTO M036: CORRUGATED ALUMINUM, 12 GA., 3"xl" CORR. (OR PVC ASTM D-3034) EXCEPT AS NOTED. 8. ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 9. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, 10. ALL ROOF DRAIN STUDS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2 x4" POST SHOWING DEPTH AND MARKED "DRAIN". 11. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS OR GRATED. 12. ALL TYPE II CATCH BASIN MANHOLES AND ALL INLETS, CATCH BASINS OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC R/W SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS OR GRATES. 1+00 0+00 PRIVATE DRIVE PROFILE SCALE: 1 =20' HORIZ, 1 =2' VERT REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION EXPIRES 11 /30/2004 13. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES EXCEEDING 4 FEET DEEP. 14. ALL STRUCTURAL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY BY MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST. 15. UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION UNDER ROADWAYS AND 907. OUTSIDE ROADWAYS. 16. STORMWATER DETENTION/RETENTION FACILITIES MUST BR FLUSHED AND CLEANED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE. 17. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION, TYPICAL METHODS SHALL INCLUDE A TEMP. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, CHANNELS FOR SURFACE RUNOFF, HAY BALES, SILT FENCE OR OTHER CONVENTIONAL METHODS 18. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH PERENNIAL GRASSES PROMPTLY UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTED ALL MANHOLE, INLET AND CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATE JUST PRIOR TO PAVING. 20. IN THE EVENT THAT FIELD CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTRACT THE ENGINEER . FOR A FIELD CHANGE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONTESTED ITEM. 21. LAND SURVEYING AND TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION FOR THIS PLAN WAS PROVIDED BY SUMMITSURVEYING, INC. N N LU W C� 515 CALL 48 .CIO URS BEFORE YO U DIG 1-800-424-5555 510 GRADING QUANTITIES CUT' 100 Cu. Yds. FILL: 100 Cu. Yds. (GRADING QUANTITIES WERE CALCULATED USING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DESKTOP COMPOSITE METHOD. CALCULATIONS DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR SOIL SWELLING AND SHRINKAGE.) NOTES 1.) EXCESS CUT MAY BE SPREAD ON SITE i05 r4.77,zkf F;TETT 2.) ANY SOIL REMOVED FROM THE SITE MUST BE HAULED TO A COUNTY APPROVED SITE, TESC DETAIL TABLE CL mu PL CLEARING LIMITS MULCH &/OR STRAW MATTING AS NEEDED PLASTIC COVER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E1.2 SF SILT FENCE RECEIVED SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E1.1 MAY 2 0 2004 IP INLET PROTECTION PERMIT COUNTER (TYP) SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E3.3 SITE ADDRESS. 10611 226TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA. TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 270325-003-102-00 1N1 AALS I DATE SW 114, SW 114, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. SERENA SITE FLAN \ ,qy REV. BY DATE PROJECT ECT MANAGER103-0013-1 LE SEM 05103/04 BRK �-20' ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING FILENAME JOB NO. JOBS/03-0013/dw9/03-0013-1.dwg 1927 SM, REET, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 SHEET (360,5" 159 (360) 651.7252 FAX GRADING AND TESC 2 ENGr ERING0Ji4YGROUPLLC.COM of mil- Ili z � o ��er� C�;v�t C a c��� �'1 Doi i oel, MAY 2 0 2004 PERMIT COUNTER SW 1/4, SW I FND 1/2" REBAR & CAP "MEYRING 2621" r A r E PT IS 0.71 E. f;!_. PROP. UNE 1/4, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E , TL 3-101 W.H. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGT ON FND 1 /2" TACK IN CAPPED REBAR) LS NO. ILLEGIBLE 0.66' N X 0.20' W OF PROP COR. DETAIL TL 3-098 -96 Lf .. C, L0 1- TL 3-099 i � 1 Q f EX. Sl-NIIARY .SDAIER iAI: F - ` PROP. LINL k Ri— ft i 5,12.6E t7.31-r,rAl! f :I !, iJivr i\i s Q - — .- IS >.D' 41d. IN OUT NW OF Pf?V'i' i.it\iE. TL 3-103 10' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT PER SUPERIOR, COURT CAUSE NO. 93173 in FND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP "MEYRING 2621"-� rn I 1 'ERT ---SD 75LFN6" SS ® 2.07 MIN C v \ FENCE ANGLE PT. % l rYll r"— .4z" cc NA? ;tPd E; I S 2 . �q, l^d. OF P&'O,ci ,_ln1E '='AONG CROSSES r3l?op UIN'lr. TL 3-100 'A' 1 /4, SEC. 25-27--3 FND TACK IN LEAD IN RIM _ 511,01 ..,.I , vv 1E—J503.v6—!v'l ^{IPv aIANNEL TBM o iN E, ilk SW, OUT tl WATER & SEWER eENCHIlARK 1-6 10 � L aJ INSPECTIONS REQ'D. 0Ia' MER/CCIT ACO O ISRESP0NSI.�?�LE FOR rr��s r r ,,, �l.si � % �::- AI'f�i`�iOVED AS NOTED UD -0 ; � CALL 425a771-0220 EXT. 1326 � , ,. , .:J;.•, ,t :O TV,,�t�:!�r';E RY EN{�INEERING �., " U �; m< RECEIVED GRAPHIC SCALE Date: w.,,.,.�2 FND 2" BRASS DISK n "X" JUL 14 2004 20 0 10 20 ao ao WITH IN CONC.-\ MON IN CASE � PERMIT COUNTER ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNERS OF ALL AFFECTED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS THEIR FACILITIES. 2. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. NATIVE MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACKFILL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING BACKFILL PLACEMENT. 3. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION. 4. SIDE SEWER STUBS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2"x4" LOCATION AT THE END WITH PORTION ABOVE GROUND PAINTED WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERS LABELED "SEWER" WITH DEPTH. T.V. AND PRESS TEST. 5. ALL 4" DIA. CLEANOUTS TO BE RAISED TO GRADE WITH CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE (LOCKING TYPE). 08 1,47e�� f�VZKO-54�J' I CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VEKIFT ALL AREA5, GRADESAND DIMENSIONS ON SITE __---.--_..__._.._....._.._.----_..._.___..--_---------....._--__-...___._.__._..__._-.---._---_-_._....____.._..__._..._____._._-.-----_.____....._--_-_-__....__....._..__.__---____.--_--_----.__..__._....._.____...._.--__._......._._.._-_-__- C^ id 5 _ - ._.. --- -- - - - - -_ - - -- - - -- --- - -- ---- - - -- - - -- r� --- - --- -- - -- — ---- - - IJ STATE OF WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT JASON TODD WALKER CERTFICATE Na 788 NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED UT. POLE EXISTING MAIL BOX CLUSTER To BE REPLACED WITH NEW STACKING UNIT � w s I a I nn ► CLIL I w I Q � Q Z�wz 1 Ixo,�oo z z 2 Q�0a E w�W w.A� M I w �S IMENT a SIGNAGE TION6kTg - z U I . ruLt NEW 12" CULV TO WIDEN EN 4' HT. MASONRY COLUMN AT 1 't O.C. ALONG ENTRY (TYP.) ORNAMENTAL) IRON PENCE INEILLO BETWEEN COLUMNS V APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENG1 ERING ---7"! Date: �--Zwuwl �-- ytj 'IN �. ^ Fence mlust be locate on private property. � J ,1 ..ropert}% owner responsible for determining property lines. ence shall not enclose or prevent access to any City maintained utilities. 0 #P-ROVE Y PLAN ING z(Y) iW70 Um REVISION LOT I DRIVEWAY 01 /AUG/04 07/SEPT/2004 DESIGN JW DRAWN JW CHECKED JW - - DATE 19/JULY/2004 NUUMMEMWAR MMI-MAN 'E. ,AIL CE► �o LO SEP 13 4 HARDSCAPE PLAN PERMIT COUNTER. & lo�ai� ���ir� y 64 e 0 EX. EVERSREEN TREES IN BACKGROUND MONUMENT ELEVATION 1. PROTECTION OF SITE Locate all existing and new underground utility Imes prior to a c netruction. Save and protect existing tre designated to remain. Repair any damage done to existing cures bing, sidewalks, fences, and any other damage caused as a result of this contract. 2. GRAD NG dieneral Contractor to be responsible for providing subgrade at all paved areas and directly adjacent landscape areas as Indicated on plans, in typical details and cross -sections and as discussed during preconetruction meetings. Subcontractors to notlf j GeneraT•Contractor of any discrepancy or potential surface or eubeurface drainage problems prior to starting work 3. LAYOUT Do not scale drawings, use dimensions and layout notation. If compound radiuses and curves are shown without notation keep the radiuses smooth and evenly tapered between tangente. Staka or paint locations of all pavement or maeorwyy structures in the field for acceptance by Owner or Landscape ,Architect. Failure to notify Owner or Landscape Archifect of any discrepancies and conflicts Immediately shall result in contractor accepting any and all remedial measures. 4. SLEEVINS Provide a minimum of (2) 4" PVC sleeves at all isolated landscape areas within pavement and walls and across driveways. 5. STRUCTURAL FILL Provide coinpactable structural fill as required at driveway and pedestrian pavement to insure minimal settlement of base materials. 6, PAVEMENT Provide pavement that Is smooth, regular, pitched for proper drainage, uniformly colored without soft spots, waves, fille, dips, or pockets. Edge lines shall be uniform and smooth Asphalt pavement edges that do not abut concrete pavement shall have a hand -tamped edge angled at approximately 4W. Seal all asps-ia% most lines and butt joints and apply tack coat at feathered or ehimmea edges. 1. RISERS Risers shown on plan are approximate, verify after subgrade Is eet prior to forming. Notify Owner's representative or Landscape Architect if number of risers and grade conditions differ from information shown on plans. S. PRANASE Slope all pavement to drain at 2% away from building. Contractor is responsible for providing adequate drainage on all paved surfaces and dlrectlg adjacent landscape graders. Provide catch basins as necessary adjacent to pavement to inter t runoff. Provide inlet drains as necessary to accommodate drainage at paved areas whirs sheet drainage is not feasible. Inlet drains shall be equally spaced and -symmetrically arranged wimin pvement meetingthe approval of the Owner or Landscape Architect. Ie all required inlet drains and cater basins into the downspout drain system of the residence. 9. FINISHES The Owner or Landscape Architect ehall appprove all pavement and maeonry finishes prior to construction. Provide samples, photographs or cut sheets of finis�les for review. 10. CLEAN UP Contractor to remove from site all excess pavement nt material and provide clean subgrade in all planting areas free from slag, aggregate or other waste products generated n 4.- Z - - 1 EDMONDS 7,)EPARTMENT LOUv--�- OW OER. APPROVE[ )A T F n BLD��� I '€ . T� OFF 2`Yi NOTE - ALL PERMITS TO BE OBTAINED BY OWNER OR BUILDER I ix6 CEDAR TOP FASCIA (TOE NAIL BETWEEN POSTS AND TO TOP RAIL, TYP) ix5 CEDAR FENCE BOARDS (NAIL TO TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL, TYP.) ix4 CEDAR BOTTOM FASCIA (TOE NAIL BETWEEN POSTS AND TO BOTI RAIL TYP) PREFAB. CHAMFERED CEDAR POST CAP (TYP.) 2x6 CEDAR TOP RAIL (TOE NAIL BETWEEN POSTS, TYP) 4x4 LP22 POST, PLUMB e 2x4 CEDAR BOTTOM RAIL (TOE NAIL BETWEEN POSTS, TYP) �--FINISHED iii li �I i illll i 11IIIIIIIII I ElIIIII II I II -III I l i-� I I -I ili li III I_I� SECTION CONIC. FTG.(ttPJ ESTATE FENCE PROPOSED SIGN AND LOGO 8'-011 Oz. MAx. ELEVATION STATEOF WASHNOTON FEGMIMM LANDSCAPE ARCMECT JASON TODD WALKER CERTFICATE No.788 NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED ul 0 LLI Z(Y) U00I LLJ Ik ~ Cp W m�0 tjj � s2 REVISION O7/SEff/2004 • =III it • � I I I I— • e • i--1 I I_ -III II. DESIGN JW o I I DRAWN ,!W CHECKED .J1l1! I I ---III III-- DATE 1871u Y/2004 RECEIVED SEP 13 2004 PERMIT COUNTED? • HARDSCAPE PLAN �p�j `i- 02g1 1,-z..- oq-4zL,a q 04--+cD-7 ��jo3 2zm��5t� REECEIVEED SEP 1' 3 2004 PERMIT COUNTER LEGEND fffICH STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (CB) 0 0 JD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SDMH) OSS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT (CO) FND MON. IN CASE FND PROPERTY CORNER, AS NOTED (JUNE 2003) _.._.._._—_ w -._..__.._.._ WATER - - S:� ---5 -- SANITARY SEWER ---5,7 — -- SI)------ STORM DRAINAGE •• •-•-.-------- CONTOURS 1 f FIRE HYDRANT (2 NOZZLE) POWER POLE GUY POLE ID, WATER METER L *J WATER VALVE wv kMAILBOX <<1Fa UTILITY POLE ANCHOR t? UTILITY. POLE AIL WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPERTY LINE —._-_...__X. FENCE LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT - -- -- -- -- INDEX CONTOURS PRE-EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Cl 108.45' 657.02' 9.27 26" C2 18.42' 20.00' 50'5248" C3 23.8 1' • 27.92' 48*51'28" C4 20.78' 20.00' 59'49'10" C5 96.14' 455.35' 12'0549" SW 114, SW 114, SEC.125, T. 27N. , R. 3E. , W.M. SNOHOMISH CO UN, TY, WASHINGTON TL 3-101 ' FND 1/2' REBAR & CAP 'MEYRING 2621" 0,27'NX0.40'E OF PROP. CDR. i' 818$3' W 0S E. OF PROS IlIV k / - $• 1IN , N. 65, 17 1,12, s 1"'?,rlw 114, s?v 114, Sw I/4; SEC. 25•••27-3 1 IV --ITNCE ANGLEPT. \ c� rl 150.7.'E.v^^F /ci 1 \ )A PROP. UNL: \ I D \ �j FINISH FLOOR--416.0 \ \ i BOTTOM OF FOOTm41,10 \` :. -FENCE 15 I PP!X. I.IN EX. 5AN?1'ARY SEWER !Ali . IF. e W3.31-RAIN CHANNEL I I ? onw IN S, OUT NW 1A I iN N u1 �J La 58 LF-B'PERF- PIPE ®O.OR (TRENCH B7 1i TL 3-103 i ti T TRENCH B'- n i �� z I OBSERVAIM WEDS—\ ' CID I I 10' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT 10' I-� � PER SUPERIOR COURT ( �y CAUSE NO. 93173 I I ` 40 TRENCH A" MICE ANGLE PT. �/ 369 so.N -",\ PRNATE RD TTWTT 999 E.., OF 1 Frye 1/2" REBAR & CAP,�- (/ •MEYRING 2621"- 0.11' E OF PROP. OCR, I �U1 I ~� 1?^."-AOS CULVf;R__.Tf (,��/''•/ J'/�f } �I�I( ,j. /r�/� _.FND 1/2• REBAR SET / IN CONCRETE (HELD AS SUBD. CDR.) // v I", I y: rt in )n LJ N Rim - 511.Ot z iE - 503.E36^-MAIN CHANNEL. _) w IN E, IN S1V, OUT N U) I UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE: CAUTION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYINGTHE LOCATION, DIMENSION, AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING U77LI77ES WHETHER SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR NOT, BY POTHOLING THE U77LI77ES AND SURVEYING THE HORIZONTAL AND VER77CAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 771IS SHALL INCLUDE CALLING UTILITY LOCATE 0 1-800-424-5555 AND THEN POTHOLING ALL OF THE EXIS77NG UTILITIES AT LOCATIONS OF NEW UTILITY CROSSINGS TO PHYSICALLY VERIFY WHETHER OR NOT CONFLICTS EXIST. LOCATIONS OF SAID •URURES AS SHOWN ON THFSE PLANS ARE &1SED UPON THE UNVERIFIED PUBLIC INFORMA77ON AND ARE SUBJECT TO VARIATION. 1F CONFLICT5 SHOULD OCCUR, 771E CONTRACTOR SHALL, CONSULT JAY GROUP ENGINEERING INC. TO RESOLVE ALL PROBLEMS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING W17H CONSTRUC77ON. .—_.,__._.P & T mi FlA -- - // ' e � ' CB TYPE 1 PUCE INLET PROlEGTEON �' 10'" p RNGVOE CATCH ......._ c CONSIRLICAOF! ....... ......... 1 rE ! \ V Cp 0 vf� � VLET PROTECTION SIDE CATCH BASIN CTION t 2 FND 1/2• VATHWT CAP t ,\ 0,09' N x PCDR. R. I OF PROP. FND 1/2' TACK 1N CAPPED REBAR, LS NO. ILLEGIOLE 0.66' N X 0.20' W OF PROP. COR. T N ; L.i TL 3-099 PAWNG IS 2.0' W. or PROP FINE PAINC IS 2.8' W. OF PROP LINE I F?u01' t_INE i TL 3-100 ..5. LINE, S ? 12, 11'N 111,;, qN i; 4, FND TAG( IN LEAD IN 11 SW i / 4. SEC. 25 -27-3 CONIC. MON IN CASE -7 4 I :k S, n"�; Fl�_S�.1'rs.Fi u,I i _. ,= --'•. 2C n 516.50 ^ E 4 4_90-MAJEE CHANNEL N S, IN E. OUT W vvl ((D CO co )D l5 ox 1n co � a o M3 FND Z• BRASS 019K WITH 'X" IN CONC.-\ M014 IN CASE PLF2' STA 0+21.46 8" PVC OBSERVATION WELL STA. 0+79.64 20' EASEMENT 16' PAVEMENT nq tb � a'05A-+'�- 8" PERE PVC J 58'f PLAN VIEW TRENCH "B" NOT TO SCALE � It�t�'C�l't��N stit►t� 1�PoVZGd> 4' Z i 100 YR \/ W.S. EL=510.92COMPACT TO 95% DENSITY EL=5OZ25 NA71 VE GROUND SECTION VIEW 2 INFILTRATION TRENCH 4 NOT TO SCALE APPROVED AS NOTED ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE _BY ENGINEERING SDR 35 MATERIAL I Alt�.�tit�+� SCH 40 '7 12—r (200 N -12 Date: � ?=010 RANCOR pJOT CcyNST�'[Z.�'C� fteepo At OF llir, Avg--( pwr �R. ►may SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL N07IFY OWNERS OF ALL AFFECTED UNDERGROUND U71LI77ES FOR RELD LOC477ONS THEIR FACILTITES 2. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. N477VE MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACKRLL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING BACKRLL PLACEMENT. J. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS FOR SUCH INSTALLA770N. 4. SIDE SEWER STUBS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE MARKED W17H A 21W LOC477ON AT THE END W/TH PORIION ABOVE GROUND PAINTED WH17E WITH BLACK LETTERS LABELED "SEWER" WITH DEPTH. TV AND PRESS TEST. 5. ALL 4" DM. CLEANOUT5 TO BE RAISED 70 GRADE WITH CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE (LOCKING TYPE). REV. NO. I DESCRIP77ON EXPIRES 11/30/2004 PL w 6" CONCRETE EXTRUDED CURB STA 1 +38.55 8" PVC OBSERVATION WELL STA. 0+81.64 °v'S�r�_.¢n,G��N'�a7'�O�^"' "r �f �{(f(y v�t�r•,cr,q�_c•'� �°c B" PERE PVC 57'1 PL4N VIEW TRENCH "A" NOT TO SCALE s 6" CONC (LIE EXTRUDED CURB r— FILTER FA.VC (MIRIFI 10OX, TYPAR 32, POLYFELT TS420 OR EQUIV,ENT) 8" 0 PEI'F(ATED PIPE ® 0.009 1 112"-3" WASHED DRAIN h0( SCALE: 1"=1000' BASIS OF BEARING: PLAT OF WESTGATE ESTATES, VOL. 20, PAGE 121. HELD PLAT BEARING OF N 01'09' 52" E BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND ALONG 106TH AVE. W., AS SHOWN. VERTICAL DATUM: ASSUMED BENCHMARK HELD ASSUMED ELEVATION OF 500.00 FEET ON TOP OF CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASED AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25-27-3. TBM SITE BENCHMARK SET SPIKE IN NORTH FACE OF UTILITY POLE +/- 30' SOUTH OF SOUTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER. ELEVATION = 514.81' PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICANTICONTACT: SERENA CONSTRUCTION 7003 117TH PLACE NE KIRKLAND, WA 98033 (425) 531-1334 CIVIL ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: JAY GROUP ENGINEERING, INC. SUMMIT SURVEYING, INC. 1927 5TH STREET 12628 82ND AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 (360) 659-8159 (425) 814-8487 FAX (360) 651-7252 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: JASON T. WALKER P.0 BOX 1542 DUVALL, WA 98019 (425) 788-8326 ARCHITECT: PLANNER: NASH JONES ANDERSON LAND PLANNING NORTHWEST 11644 NE 80TH STREET LARRY D. DEISHER KIRKLAND, WA. 98033 1523 TENTH STREET (425) 828-1918 MARYSVILLE, WA. 98270 (425) 339-1302 NOTES 1) UTILITIES AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS WHICH MAY EXIST UNDERGROUND. OR ARE NOT VISIBLE, MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS MAP. 2) THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS 40,483 SO. FT. OR 0.93 ACRES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAy 2 0 2004 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, 3EXCEPT THEGEAST E150 FEET; THEREOF, AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET THEREOF, ND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 20 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. PERMiT (`,OUNT RSITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON - SITE ADDRESS: 10611 226TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA. TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 270325' 003-102-00 IN177ALS DA TE AY ROUP REV. SW 114, SW 114, SEC.25, T.27N., R. U., W.M. SERENA SITE PLAN BY DATE PROJECT MANAGER SCALE DRAWING ENGINEERING, INC.JO8S/03-0013/dwg/03-0013.dwg SEM 0510JI04 BRK 10-30, FILENAME JGE JOB NO. 03-0013 ROAD, DRAINAGE & UTILITIES SHEET 1 of - 3. 1927 5T.TREET, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 (3W59-8159 (360) 651 7252 FAX ENGE"R/NG@JAYGROUPLLC.COM SW 114, SW 1 /4, SEC. 25, T 127N. , R. 3E. , W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON A - 4. •' a .d d n .i c ,i 1'41 Co- 4. 4- N 1 53 W 178.59 - sz- - - . k \ h f EX. SANITARY S[WFR UIr____._J� I I film ^_.551J.GFi -- _ ..._ IE 50:3.31-MAJN CHANkIEl_ ;V ItJ S>, OlJ I, / R' ........ Su _.__._...... r __......... --........ ca I � w ` L0 I J� 1 Z I r� Icn I I 10 I I u / II I EX. SANHARY _SEWER MH.•-_ /I IE = 503,P6,44AIN CHANNEL 1 f AC' in N 88'18' '_ w 10 �\ ll i �` 1 FINISH FLOOR=416.0 BOTTOM OF FOOT=413..0 - .. f. o ` o � I ( IN r_, IN SW, OUT N OVINER/CONTi AC 019 B f= ESP ONSIK FOR EI 08110;oN CO3,I1 I'1C-IL Ai; ID D All AGE F CL G 30 T GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 ( IN FEET ) I inch = 30 ft. GENERAL NOTES: 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE • THE EXACT LOCATION(S) OF ALL THE UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID 60 DAMAGE AND DISTURBANCE. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFIRM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOII MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS ANDANY ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS SITE. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK WITHIN THE SITE AND CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOI? ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 6. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL. DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION HAS 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONCRETE (CP), NON -REINFORCED, ASTU C-14; CORRUGATED METAL 14 GA. GALVANIZED, ASPHALT COATED TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER, MEETING AASHTO M036: CORRUGATED ALUMINUM, 12 GA., 3 A" CORR. (OR PVC ASTM D-3034) EXCEPT AS NOTED. 8. ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 9. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 10. ALL ROOF DRAIN STUDS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2 x4" POST SHOWING 0EPTH AND MARKED DRAIN". It. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS OR GRATED. 12. ALL TYPE 11 CATCH BASIN MANHOLES AND ALL INLETS, CATCH BASINS OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIW SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS OR GRATES. APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING Date: 1+00 0+00 PRIVATE DRIVE PROFILE SCALE. 1 =20' HOR/Z, 1 "=2' VERT REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION .�( EXPIRES 11 30 2004 13. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES EXCEEDING 4 FEET DEEP. 14. ALL STRUCTURAL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY BY MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST. 15. UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95Z RELATIVE COMPACTION UNDER ROADWAYS AND 907 OUTSIDE ROADWAYS. 16. STORMWATER DETENTIONIRETEN77ON FACILITIES MUST BR FLUSHED AND CLEANED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE. 17. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. TYPICAL METHODS SHALL INCLUDE A TEMP. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, CHANNELS FOR SURFACE RUNOFF, HAY BALES, SILT FENCE OR OTHER CONVENTIONAL METHODS. 18. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITH PERENNIAL GRASSES PROMPTLY UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTED ALL MANHOLE, INLET AND CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATE JUST PRIOR TO PAVING. 20. IN THE EVENT THAT FIELD CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTRACT THE ENGINEER . FOR A FIELD CHANGE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONTESTED ITEM. 21. LAND SURVEI'ING AND TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION FOR THIS PLAN WAS PROVIDED BY SUMMITSURVE)ING, INC. Fz- CO N V.J J W W v 515 510 505 0_07',?M i'LEF 500,00 RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2004 PERMIT COUNTER GRADING QVANTTTIES CUT: 100 Cu. Yds. FILL: 100 Cu. Yds. (GRADING QUANTITIES WERE CALCULATED USING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT DESKTOP COMPOSITE METHOD. CALCULATIONS DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR SOIL SWELLING AND SHRINKAGE.) NOTES 1.) EXCESS CUT MAY BE SPREAD ON SITE. 2.) ANY SOIL REMOVED FROM THE SITE MUST BE HAULED TO A COUNTY APPROVED SITE. TESC DETAIL TABLE CL CLEARING / IMI TS MU MULCH &/OR STRAW MATTING AS NEEDED PL PLASTIC COVER TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E1.2 - SF SILT FENCE SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E1.1 IP INLET PROTECTION (TYP) SEE EDMONDS STANDARD DETAIL E3.3 SITE ADDRESS: 10611 226TH MEET SW EDMONDS, WA:. TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 270325-003-102-00 INITIALS DATE SW 114, SW 114, SEC.25, T.27N., R.3E., W.M. SERENA SITE .PLAN AY ROUP REV BY DATE PROJECT MANAGER SCALE �\ SEM 05/03/04 BRK NGINEE'RING, INC. DRAWING FILENAME JGE JOB N0. J0BS/03-0013/dw9/03-0013-1.dwg 03-00.13-1 7 STFREET, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 SHEET (360" 159 (360) 651.7252 FAX GRADING AND TESC 2 ENG► fR1NGC@JAYGROUPLLC.COM of� J"N EX, SANI 'I J'A RY SEWER Mil ' --- RIM, = '512,66 lE = 503,31,­MAIN CHANNEL IN S, OUT NW w SW 114, SW 114, SEC.259 T.27N, R.3E., W.H. SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON FND 1/2- REBAR & CAP TL 3-101 FND 1/2" TACK IN CAPPED "MEYRING 2621" f REBAR, LS NO. ILLEGIBLE 0.66' N X 0.20' W OF 0.27' N X 0.40' E PROP. COR. OF PROP. COR. 'ROACHMI"'N' LIAIL ,METAL SHED TL 3-098 A 5 4 N 88 1 53)) w FENCE ;S PROP O.5' E. O. LINEF 1 32. 76' S. ON N. 8,5 E -,z12. S ................. -n----- L-s Ld Tl"�'CE ANGLE" P 0.' 2' E, OF 'ROP, LINE •�­'_ENCE IS PROP. LINL L0 0+87) TL 3-103 : 0 w Lu 0-) 75LF-6" SS Lo do @ 2.07. MIN In it 10 co 10' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT Lo PER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 93173 0 C0 FENCE ANGLE P-1. E. OF 10OLF-6" SS @ 2. OZ MIN. FND 1/2- REBAR & CAP "MEYRING 2621" COR. fps 'ERT I RIM = 511.01 - iE = 503.86-4JAIN CHANNEL IN E. IN' '--,W, OUT N SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNERS OF ALL AFFECTED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS THEIR FACILITIES. 2. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. NATIVE MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACKFILL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING BACKFILL PLACEMENT. 3. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION. 4. SIDE SEWER STUBS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2"x4" LOCATION AT THE END WITH PORTION ABOVE GROUND PAINTED WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERS LABELED "SEWER" WITH DEPTH. T.V. AND PRESS TEST. 5. ALL 4" DIA. CLEANOUTS TO BE RAISED TO GRADE WITH CAST IRON FRAME AND GRATE (LOCKING TYPE). 73. 76 N 8801 8' 2 7E"— W-o- SD-- T P & T RIGHT-OF-WAY CCN.5f RUC-i 1j"N''PERMITI AND INSPECTION REQUIRED (Co- 0 2o' 'WATER LINE 'ro HOW FND 1/2- WITHOUT CAP D.09' N X 0.02' W 84. 92 OF PROP. COR. 178. 68 SD G G WATER & SEWER INSPECTIONS REQ'D. CALL 426-771-0220 EXT. 1326 GRAPHIC SCALE m - — ( IN FEET ) I inch = 20 ft. I G� TL 3-099 IS ZO' 1Y, OF PP()'P LINE - PAVING CROSSES TL 3-100 J\ L!"'IE, S 1112, "11/4, SlOv G 2 3 G____ 1 "4, SEC. 25-27--' ----------- f ROMLVERT tj TBM ,door -- APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING Ti%5=10LLUI_� Date: IV, lZeA 4 —Ss-- FND TACK IN LEAD IN CONC. MON IN CASE - .11 RR,4 = 516.50 ,,--1 0 co co < (o < 0 m < FND 2" BRASS DISK WITH OX" IN CONC._\, I MON IN CASE I REV. NO. I DESCRIPTION I - -1 EXPIRES 11/30/2004J SITE ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT NO.'& INITIALS I DATE RECEIVED J U L 14 2004 PERMIT COUNTER 10611 226TH STREET SW EDMONDS, WA. 270325-003-102-00 sw 1A sw 'A SEC-25, T.27N., R.3E.' W.M. SERE -NA SP GREV. 0 Y DAM PROXCT MANAGER SCALE AYROUP SEM 9/10103 BRK 1"--50' DRAWINGEAKINo nvNAME JGE JOB NO. NGINEERING, INC. JOBS/03-00131dwg103-0013.dwg 03-0013 ;l STH STREET, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 SHEET (360) 65" 159 (360) 651.7252 FAX 2 ENGINEERING@JAYGROUPLLC.COM SEWER AND WATER Of ^ &I L- 3