Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
10727 226TH ST SW.PDF
10727 226TH ST SW L t v/0 zoox to z.Soa za1L 7 - �a SLonQftt+Y+- Z 6 3 C.tawl spaA4 tot16,e 4° 6mis.A"4c 22112. 0 �2b7 417 C 3ae.�-1 r \ � m � Z " \ N V W Q "Ala hi —Z '� • i.pp¢OX 991— 0— GONFIGV —0.i Pat HE1C-HT Ce.Lp C. Oct.1T A 110.8,/ c 114.2: 10 11t.9✓ �y raTA,L y51 3. H T 4 = 3.3 lkr]!: i 00 ,�AU 22C= . ST. S.W. SITE PLAW OW aw 14 eF TN;---Yl Oa--IW* ' Twc aw W es eT 0.TrI ,� N ♦C�3 Ro�v w►T f� f I i .d E f APPROVED OY PLANNI s""i "f" "" ¢ 12, i 5 �n� 10 zz�+-� � - DwTun. pr loao _ yO nn vc Water Service Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ ( REPAIRS ® LID NO ................... .ASMT. NO.................. OWNER.................................................................. ...................--- CONTRACTOR ..JAtV.....� L4 .................................... PERMIT NO. QJS028� JOB ADD SS ......10-� 2.-� /...........2- 2.G T" S-T,JW:. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO- -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO. .................................... n -T-N JL G-� n_ NAME OF ADDITION....................................................................................................................... I"coPPE� I1I4"COP. T eF- 4 VALV E PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) Approved: DATE Cr—T.: .. }J9.9 5..... By � ..��.. V ..................... NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s). Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on the map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s). y ti..,..t . �'e _;,,c W r,,,,nf;7' � N -.s. �l'r,u,{ �dN.aca%'y . �.h,..v;.lti"L+:x`Z._r �gy,�`l4m a.•-"r'� r^'�µ�/vi..�,y4n- . . ,, >,.a�.�r•:-.� „f "'.•�.�rzsr�.w +�"K2,hp�'fr�,Frr"lk�.n `W-r 'Fw'YF`I� y,v,�w,yJr"�a-i �'.^.rn•ne'tr�i-y.,1fi" �; t' _ k �1v�0 PC-,qm IT SSG &ON a Y, , CITY o e �DS SIDE SEWER PERMIT wo t �89 o yPERMIT j, e _ 0721 V��� ^1 Address of Construction: zz � Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. #F1'�'�- / ' rc -'Building Permit No. 9 1z 90 )KIS-ingle Family Invasion into City Right-of-Way:ArNo ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property: 0)106�11 Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify that have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicate on the back of the Permit Card. Date � * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771 C3S UBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permit Fee: 30. co Issued By J7(2 Trunk Charge: 1� Date Issued: �� 97—s— Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: 2®l/b Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Reason Rejected: Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date(19'3" Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File "`Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3190 c The City of Edmonds Side Seaver Drawing EASEAfEN'l"NO. ............... NEW CONS•:RTJCTION G REPAIRS LID NO. ............. ASMT' NO OWNER.. j.......]...•-.-••................... ,,..\\ JOB ADDRESS --- L_ !. l-_ - " lQ1 ... .T"-�..W 0 ..... ._.. ..--•- J--- --•- CONTRACTOR•............................................................................•..---• PERMIT NO. / I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. -.- ................................. BLOCK NO. ........_..__..._.._._..--_... ....................•--.........._._.........--•-••---- NAME OF ADDITION r �-- i L� r I, 3 y� �•✓.c co , 2's�ctp• C•i IPA�++L il, l.ip � SurFac,c.� l5� �z 14 "p.r.G ea . 3 'oe=ep C- T r-!`A MC 4. 1 "I D TD ,SLtr r,4Gt -fY% Tiivq a ip r S • l3 Approved: PWO-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE . `..�� `� - � ,. 1�1 Lovell-Sauerland Imp ■ ■ & Associates, Inc. Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants ` Mr Don Fiene MAY 2 61995 Engineering Department FNGWEfiVt.r City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 =: Subject: Storm runoff control system for Johan nesseh-PropertV, 10727 - 226th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Don, 19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood Washington 98036 - (206) 775.1591 Seattle: (206) 340.0830 FAX: (206) 672.7998 May 25, 1995 LSA No. 3360 As stated in my previous letter we intended to provide runoff control for the home at the above location using an infiltration system. I have modified the calculations, and as requested increased the width and added the filter fabric wrap to the trench design. The calculated theoretical length of trench is 8,3 fee for the area proposed to be drained into the system (not including the safety factor or the mitigating effect of void space detention volume). Adding a safety factor of 2 seems excessive, given the fact that the size, topography, and soil type of the property makes it impossible for surface runoff to go anywhere else. If the system were found to be performing inadequately over time, a larger one could be easily built in the space available. Any such failure would not cause property damage, would not affect any downstream system, would not affect any other property, and would only cause the temporary inconvenience of surface ponding during an extreme storm event. Even at a length 83 feet, the system provides a safety factor of 1.6 for a 10-year storm, which is as good as most of the rest of the City's systems. The circumstance of this site justify elimination of the safety factor, but at this point I will defer to your final decision. Finally, I was unable to establish with certainty the total area of impervious surface which will ultimately drain into this system. I recommend that if the area is substantially greater than or less than the assumed 7460 square feet, the system be adjusted by 1.15 feet per 100 square feet of impervious surface, multiplied by whatever safety factor is used. This provides a little flexibility to deal with changes. Please call me if you have any questions on this...n 1;a� Sincerely, 0,6 �-Lt�A. Craig Campbell, P.E. 1� A 4, r RRRR�p tut}{ttt!�it'.•`t� �' [::fl: e. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 24-May-95 CITY OF EDMONDS 11:42 AM HELLERE1 HOMES, LSA 3360 (site at 10727 - 226th St. Edmonds) Calculation of allowable infiltration rate. Based oA the table below, the following infiltration rates are used for design: -------------------------------baba-- baba-- --- Field Measured Infiltration Data April 4,1995 Field data was collected by contractor, based on City of Edmonds perc test instructions. Test holes were inspected by engineer, and perc rate spot tested. Holes were spaced at approximately 50 foot on center. Material was brown reddish bown sand, with some gravel and some finer material. Antecedent weather included heavy rain showers. PERC HOLE A Measure- Infiltr. Time Depth Rate min in/hr 0.0 28.0 1.0 22.0 360.0 2.0 18.0 240.0 3.0 15.0 180.0 4.0 13.0 120.0 5.0 11.5 90.0 6.0 10.5 60.0 7.0 9.5 60.0 8.0 8.5 60.0 9.0 7.5 60.0 10.0 6.5 60.0 PERC HOLE B Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate infhrl in/hr 28.0 18.0 600.1 13.0 300.0 11.0 120.0 9.5 90.0 8.0 90.0 7.0 60.0 5.5 90.0 4.5 60.0 3.5 60.0 129.0 1 2.5 60.0 PERC HOLE C Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate in/hrI in/hr 28.0 19.0 540.1 13.5 330.0 10.0 210.0 7.5 150.0 5.5 120.0 I 4.0 90.0 153.0 1 PERC HOLE D Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate in/hrl in/hr 28.0 18.0 600.1 13.5 270.0 10.0 210.0 8.0 120.0 1 4.0 240.0 240.0 i Avg in/hr 288.0 ---- ----------- ------------------------ ----- ------------------------ ---- Infiltrationrate= USE: 60.000 in/hr j� OF /'/,t F� Infiltration rate = 1.00 min/inch f/ Infiltration rate = 1.00 inches/min`2^ Infiltration rate = 0.017 inches/sec , Infiltration rate = 0.0014 cfs/sf surface L Q Rational method calculation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The following is a calculation for the entire area of impervious surface on the property, including the existing house, new additions, and proposed driveway areas. Time of Concentration, T(c) minutes = Use 7.0 minutes Design storm, 100 year, Itc in/hr = 3.000 " (From WSDOT duration-intensitt tables for Seattle Future runoff coeff: 0.900 Total Area: The total area of impervious on the site is approximately 8400 square feet. A significant portion of that is already being drained to existing infiltration systems, which apparently are functioning adequately. The existing systems were not inspected. The proposed remodelled area and new impervious pavement, which are assumed to drain to the new infiltration system consist of the following: Area of existing structure being remodelled 1760 sf Area of existing pavement to remain, and new pavement 5700 Total 7460 sf It is assumed that all other areas will continue to drain to their existing discharge points. Use 7460 sf Fut. flow off ret. area, Of cfs= (Itc x A x CI) = 0.462 Infiltration trench sizing. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------baba-- - With an assumed infiltration rate of 0.0014 cfs/sf of surface, and a total required infiltration of 0.462 cfs, the area needed for infiltration is 0.462 / 0.0014 = 333 square feet Width of ditch 2.00 feet Depth of ditch 2.00 feet use 1/2 depth for area talc, = 1.000 ft equivalent depth Surface area per If of ditch = �-�-��--�-- Required length of ditch 4.00 square fee` t O _ 3 feet Total volume of ditch 333 cubic feet Percent of voids 30.00% Diameter of pipe 6.0 inches Usable volume of pipe 16.3 cubic feet Usable volume of ditch 95.0 cubic feet Totahume-- -1.11s --r of 2, doubling the length of the ditch to 66 ft ator C;�i_ Length of ditch required per 100 sf of new impervious 2.231 ft Attached is a sketch showing the infiltration trench cross section. Trench should be located in a landscape area close to the test holes locations. tcl';� 61) "'s "'� via4m js oq�� �► 5000-PdWl iYON IV, 'A J- CLQ,O *3 -O"ne 'A C4 I% - Not sod aua 0 ; 4 o—/-- ,I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Figure III-3.17 Roof Downspout System CB Trench Roo 1 -( Trench - - CB t_J Possible Alignments PLAN VIEW Not to Scale V Roof drain Roof Observation Well / 6" Perforated Pipe I 1 I I I � Sump w/ Infiltration Trench solid lid Roof Drain I PROFILE VIEW nts Overflow Observation Well Splash block 1 A Sheet Cover Material �- 1' min. — — — — Level e = V min. 1 , T 1 / Fine "IfV min. 1' minim—(2 L - __�i mesh I 5' min. A Level screen CB Sump with 6" Perforated Pipe Solid Lid (CPEP single wall acceptable) I varies V-6" PVC Pipe - (perforated) G Wrap Trench Entirely With Filter Fabric 10' min. Observation Well (w/metal cap & lock) Compact Backfill Te 6" Perforated Pipe (4" acceptable for roof downspout systems) Washed rock '/." - 1'/:" - -- - e isUS ml-� SECTION A -A Not to Scale zctiemp�nc of- �jPiG�L • �y ��M :••i::::::•�•m:::i:i�:::i:i:i:::� �i ::::iiiii:i:::::� ii:i::::::::::::i:::::::::i::::::iiEE•.:::: ........E ........� ........�.� �....�� ....E;.EE......E.Immi.E.■m...E.■mm..EEEmimmm::::..SEEMS .mmmmmmm mmmmmmmmm ■mmmmmmmm ■ ■ ■■m. mmmm■ ■ ■m■..■ ■■■....■....■.. . ■■■ mmmm mmmmommmmmm mmmmon� ::::::.:::•:ommom :::•••0 MENC'C:::::..::•:':::::::::: ■......:::......:..E..E:'EE:.UF..��...:..E•:Ci:.::E.E:E:.m■.:.:.■..m.E.EE.■:■:EE.■.■■m■r ■■■■■■■ m■HH■■■ ■■ ■■�■ ■■loom■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ im. ■■mm■■■�■■■ ■ solo■■ u■H■■ ■ ::::� •:�.m:::::::::E::::EE:E::::::E::::::::::::E::mm :m`o ::E:::::: �::::::: I:::::�.:�:C:::::":::.:::: :::N:":.:::::::::''::�.':::::::::::n::::m::::M:::::: .....H.......:; EE::::::::EEmmum iE• INNOWENNEEMN:::::E::C:"•':::"ll 'EN C C :am L.:::::■1 0 I: i.E�i:::�i i1wa i:�Jiii��ii� n 1' mommommommm :::::� mmonam::::: m..■■■m■ ■ .■■■■■■■■■■■M�■■■■■■■m■m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/■■■/■■■■■■■■■■H■■■■■/H■■■■■■■■H■■■ �L "kING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL o Filter fabric shall be wrapped entirely around trench drain rock prior to backfilling. Method of Analysis/Length of Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches The length of trench required is based on the assumption of providing a bottom trench area sized to Infiltrate at a rate equal to the rainfall intensity for the peak 10-minute time step for the 10-year, 24-hour duration design storm event (Time step 460 to 470 minutes, 5.4% of total storm volume P,o, see Table 3.5.1A), and by the maximum infiltration rate (1m) which is based on the Soil Texture Class by the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) designation system (see Figure 4.5.16 and Table 4.5.1A). The length of trench required is determined by dividing the required infiltration area (A,) by 4 feet (the two -foot trench widith plus one foot on either side for side wall infiltration). A, is computed using the following equation: Am = (0.054 P,OAO/10 IM �7 osq(�� � U Where: , f a 0 P,o = 10-Year, 24-hour design storm total precipitation, inches (from Figure 3.5."71 IM = the maximum infiltration rate from Table 4.5.1 A. min./inch. % area of the roof tributary to the system, ftz. (Note: a typical single-family -side s a roof area of approximately 2,000 Therefore, the trench length required is: L = (A,/4 (feet); in feet TABLE 4.5.1A MAXIMUM INFILTRATION RATES FOR ROOF. DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS Maximum Infiltration Rates (I.)' Soil Texture Class (U.S.D.A.) (Inches per Hour) (Inches Per Minutes) 1. Coarse sands or Cobbles 20.00 0.333 2. Medium sand 8.27 38 3. Fine sand, loamy sand 2.41 0.040 4. Sandy loam, 1.02 0.017 5. Loam 0.52 0.009 *From a study of over 5,000 soil samples under -carefully controlled procedures by the U.S.D.A. (Rawls, Brakensick and Saxton, 1982). Example: Proposed residence located at Kent East Hill Roof area (AR) = 2,000 square feet; Soil Texturepass = loamy sand; I,,, = 0.040 inches per minute; P,o = 2.9 inches( A, _ (0.054 P,oAp)/10 Im _((0.054)(2.9)(2,000))/((10)(0.040)) = 783 ftz K = N/4=(783)/(4) = ;fie, ,t; .(NQtp;'could bi accomplished by two trenchs). 4.5.1-2 1 /90 0 0�: CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT / ZONE NUMBER 95ap%Y9 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION Boa SUITE APT+ ADDRESS /� /'/ /•` - : ---- OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS �Y , —( (: Cn �' 1 „,o 1-o }\ y) tO LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO LID NO ZMAILING ADDRESS I / 0 / ((� Z -t 7TTESCP PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ Street Use Permit Read ❑ Inspection Regwred ❑ Sidewalk Required ❑ W CITY ZIP (% n J / 7,, TELEPHONE NUMBER ' // _ / G T�(^ 6 c' NAME • METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES REQUIRED =RV ❑ NO ❑ 3 Q ADDRESS REMARKS U W W z CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER i W NAME GGIG'y� �/C�JPr -�wr, ADDRESS iVr (J GX O 7 ¢ 0 ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY U ¢ �, CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER d Ong GXJ STATE LICENSE NUMBER— EXPIRAT 11f "//=►/L-y/ho �(� R M DATED VIEWED Y SION AREA SEPAREVIEW ADS NO ,44.or ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE JEXEMPT SHORELINE e ' Legal Description of Property -include all easements 2 P E%P 4 VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE u¢ a a SETBACKS — FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE ? z FRONT SIDE REAR a Property Tax Account _ Parcel No. REMARKS a '°�.r ElU PNEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDITION 0 COMMERCIAL �n MECHANICAL 0 ©•REMODEL El APT. BLDG. LJ SION ❑O GRADING ❑ FENCE REPAIR CYDS. I_%_Fn DEMOLISH El WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUS/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS` ACTIVITY)gx�LAIN:` CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE (!'� / OCCUPANT GRO P SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED YES AREA OCCUPANT LOAD MARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 a m cal w O C NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PLOT PLAN) CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER _ DESCRIBE WORK Tye BE DONE (ATTACH / �_(S �� y���►►►�/�K �` r FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED _�<��"' • f�'�/ �� _.�� �,�� ✓, / LF VALUATION FEE '54WAIA111 r . " -VC.(17'- PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING � l HEAT SOUR,E: Tr GLAZING D/q PLUMBING / Plan Check No. MECHANICAL r) This Permit covers work to be done on private properly ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewPlks, driveways, marquees, BIC.) Will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application:180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE 11 41, ENO. INSPECTION FEE v, w cemployees, = "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to G, f� .J/ f C PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0 OX modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriZ- AUTHORIZES ad thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the Mate of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insur a and PCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in apace provided. SIGNAT 10 AGENT) JDATE SIG ED DEPARTMENT _ >� CITY OF OFFIaA sIG E DATE a EDMONDS ` CALL FOR RELEASED BY DATE ATTENTION INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL — Flle YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC I CITY OF EDMONDS [LEGAL NE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION O/WyN�ERR NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS �I �p DRESS r t f d Y11R 5 �(1� G" 1) ysmil.Y� DESCRIPTIOI, CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Canla��s 4$�Z`C) 77�,-z�llo JAMEPi7 ADDRESS1 C P o Box t3 0� ;ITY ZIP TELEPHONE IN ��(S - (o5(o� 1'nrn' QU � oZ7 S VAME1 ,I 4DDRSSO� LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE (eN=IocK,3 5-d-95 Description of Property - include all easements TarcNl Parcelel No. EjNEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL 2[REMODEL APT_ BLDG. SIGN OREPAIR GRAD,NG FENCE CYDS L%_Fn DEMOLISH a INSERT OOOSTOVE ❑ HOT TUB SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT a ROCKERY Q RENEWAL NUMBER % NUMBER OF CRITICAL ARES STORIES pC UNITSDWELL, NUMABER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE IATTTAACH PLOT PLAN) /� 4 PERMIT NUMBER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCPermit ApProved ❑ RW PRequired ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Red ❑ PROPOSED Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED I I YES ❑ NO ❑ 3EMARKS 4lta7+•f77UA� SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT 4 EXP VARIANCE OR CU I /PYANNI REVIEW BY REAR BY SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT REOUIRED ❑ LOAD YES REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 FINAL INSPECTION REOUIRED 10E �z PUN CHECK FEE _r - — BUILDING 5O HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING 0/0 PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL 6 G r/� KJ This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public qomaln (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require Separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE 5. Permit Application: 180 Days „ ..._. ,3u Permit Limit:1 Year • Provided Work Is'Started Wlthln 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his 0r her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE 2 7U a successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold w f = harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT tJ 9 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance i nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner.,l'agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work auth0riz• ad thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• tion Insurance and RJZW 18.27. SIGNATUR IOVy,N AGE TI J..TE SIGZN D I Ili %S Ur� THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIALS 51GNATU DATE WATT: NTIONIT CALL FO INSPECTION RELE E / DATE IS UNTIL ALFINAL INSPECTION AWFUL TO USE RHAS BEEN MADE OCCUPY A IA NG DOAPPROVAL UOR RE 771-0220 CIRIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor CA FILE NO. Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) I. Site Address/Location: 12-7 ZZ.C""*-- S+- 5 L-3 2. Property Tax Account Number: Z�2 03 3 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): RECEIVED -4 "'Is this site currently developed? yes; —Zno. FEB 17 1995 If yes; how is site developed? 5.. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. 1ERW COUNTER Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: O ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Czl ; Approx. Depth: di What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in. the floodway floodplain J of a water course. 9. Site contains a creed or an area where water flows cross the grounds surface? Fl ws are year- round? A%(�) Flows are seasonal? hat time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ;meadow shrubs , )� • mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) It. Obvious wetland is present on site: _ 165 . {� For;City. Staff Use Only ....... .... Site is Zoned? 2.. SC$:maplied soil type(s)? _17 EJeref% a 11-11 4r sa- ✓d.K l oe v" 0-9.A.:s%oe 3. Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? A/O, A. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? //,/6 - 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? 6. - .Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map. �D :DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVER WAIVER .Reviewed by: anner Date Rev 09/29N. 3 Yr : City ,of . Edmonds Critical Areas,.Checklist ... The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, RECL 11/�;,D MAR 0 2 1995 PERMIT COUNTER and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinitymap or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map,. etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge' (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant:(WQ' F'C hbf'i1�s Applicant Representative:lp Name Name �t C) Street Address Street Address City, State, ZIP Sig ture �7S Z(3/ Phone Date City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date i ® In sac M.N. w N C O,frD1rNA �\ \•� , ~:�:• ` ' �'9� \ SITE PLAN TH. aw ri •v nn a+w f4 a —6 awfq �' �•�� / 1 �\�. ev sas OW W sI ar<r a7 7V'a'{M� 'i, I WeIv11T CI'll LCS A. 10%1 go TOTAL 4S9.M •Fy 113. ' as app60A DIIWa "".v comrliow.T.eN I I I I APPROV . Gl PLAN;►d;;:� • I —4 srwer /rp I I � � 2 2 ST. S.W. ,.. —� w�iaan .P.�vr C1O IWO ZSOX zax 2AP "to — �2 -1, I Q I Ox�arlNc ��� 11// R��AaVO Q' avpnof va.vf "'v eoNr�aua..r�oy NEtC,NT C4LC5 A iO4.S n 110.8✓ G 2V 'rOA L YS9. Y ✓M 3.3 x 138.3 /`MA pw w. • 2 2 GV ST. S.W. 0 1 I n APPROVED aY PLAWNIa,r.a i rY C 1 rn cn w O V U ct: W g w �r SITE PLAN -row yw Y1 ...—+WA o►r+a tw39 ev rwr awA Or.rcT 15 i.I siM� .fry Ro►a•a►7 Z•a.�=R-s-1Z 5-rir� r = 25 5 ►n� = 1 O DI.Tvw Pr joo.o -1PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Owner.r4 A3 ALsS Plan Check No• Q6 - 2-7 Address: 1 Cfl21% 4WIZ&-T?+ST Date:_ !(,/e1 After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M.WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS —10:00 A.M.-6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 1&60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 1830.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 1830) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 1830) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall mat with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 1410/s. Waiver granted to "--�' %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 1&10) t 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required LID# Fees paid: Yes No Charge (ECDC 18.10} 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) STREET BILE i � = Lovell-Sauerland min- � ■ ■ & Associates, Inc. Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants Mr Don Fiene Engineering Department City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, WA 98020 MAY 2 61999 FN�71NE�PH1N(:<i Subject: Storm runoff control system for Johannessen Property; 10727 - 226th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Don, 19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 - (206) 775-1591 Seattle: (206) 340-0830 FAX: (206) 672.7998 May 25, 1995 LSA No. 3360 As stated in my previous letter we intended to provide runoff control for the home at the above location using an infiltration system. I have modified the calculations, and as requested increased the width and added the filter fabric wrap to the trench design. The calculated theoretical length of trench is 8�for the area proposed to be drained into the system (not including the safety factor or the mitigating effect of void space detention volume). Adding a safety factor of 2 seems excessive, given the fact that the size, topography, and soil type of the property makes it impossible for surface runoff to go anywhere else. If the system were found to be performing inadequately over time, a larger one could be easily built in the space available. Any such failure would not cause property damage, would not affect any downstream system, would not affect any other property, and would only cause the temporary inconvenience of surface ponding during an extreme storm event. Even at a length 83 feet, the system provides a safety factor of 1.6 for a 10-year storm, which is as good as most of the rest of the City's systems. The circumstance of this site justify elimination of the safety factor, but at this point I will defer to your final decision. Finally, I was unable to establish with certainty the total area of impervious surface which will ultimately drain into this system. I recommend that if the area is substantially greater than or less than the assumed 7460 square feet, the system be adjusted by 1.15 feet per 100 square feet of impervious surface, multiplied by whatever safety factor is used. This provides a little flexibility to deal with changes. Please call me if you have any questions on this. Sincerely, Craig Campbell, P.E. STREET FIL E l '"n� i DRAINAGE CALCULATIONSt 24-May-96 CITY OF EDMONDS 1 i:42 AM HELLERV; HOMES, LSA 3360 (site at 10727 - 226th St. Edmonds) Calculation of allowable Infiltration rate. Based on the table below, the following infiltration rates are used for design: Field Measured Infiltration Data April 4, 1995 Field data was collected by contractor, based on City of Edmonds perc test instructions. Test holes were inspected by engineer, and perc rate spot tested. Holes were spaced at approximately 50 foot on center. Material was brown reddish bown sand, with some gravel and some finer material. Antecedent weather included heavy rain showers. PERC HOLE A Measure- Infiltr. Time Depth Rate min in/hr 0.0 28.0 1.0 22.0 360.0 2.0 18.0 240.0 3.0 15.0 180.0 4.0 13.0 120.0 5.0 11.5 90.0 6.0 10.5 60.0 7.0 9.5 60.0 8.0 8.5 60.0 9.0 7.5 60.0 10.0 6.5 60.0 PERC HOLE B Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate in/hr l in/hr I l 28.0 l 18.0 600.1 l 13.0 300.0 l 11.0 120.0 I 9.5 90.0 I 8.0 90.0 l 7.0 60.0 l 5.5 90.0 l 4.5 60.0 l 3.5 60.0 1.29.0 l 2.5 60.0 Infiltration rate = USE. Infiltration rate = Infiltration rate = Infiltration rate = Infiltration rate = Rational method calculation. PERC HOLE C Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate in/hrI in/hr I l 28.0 l 19.0 540.1 l 13.5 330.0 l 10.0 210.0 1 7.5 150.0 5.5 120.0 4.0 I 90.0 I I 153.01 PERC HOLE D Measure- Infiltr. Avg I Depth Rate in/hrl in/hr I l 28.0 l 18.0 600.1 l 13.5 270.0 l 10.0 210.0 I 8.0 120.0 I 4.0 I I 240.0 1 I 240.0 1 60.000 in/hr e / 1.00 minfinch O 1.00 inches/min` 0.017 inches/sec� 0.0014 cfs/sf surface F Lei Avg in/hr 288.0 The following is a calculation for the entire area of impervious surface on the property, including the existing house, new additions, and proposed driveway areas. Time of Concentration, T(c) minutes = Use 7.0 minutes Design storm, 100 year, Itc in/hr = 3.000' (From WSDOT duration-intensitl tables for Seattle Future runoff coelf: 0.900 Total Area: The total area of impervious on the site is approximately 8400 square feet. A significant portion of that is already being drained to existing infiltration systems, which apparently are functioning adequately. The existing systems were not inspected. The proposed remodelled area and new impervious pavement, which are assumed to drain to the new infiltration system consist of the following: Area of existing structure being remodelled 1760 sf Area of existing pavement to remain, and new pavement 5700 Total 7460 sf It is assumed that all other areas will continue to drain to their existing discharge points. Use. 7460 sf Fut. flow oft ret. area, Of cis= Qtc x A x Cf) = 0.462 Infiltration trench sizing. ------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ With an assumed infiltration rate of 0.0014 cfs/sf of surface, and a total required infiltration of 0.462 cfs, the area needed for infiltration is 0.462 ! 0.0014 = 333 square feet Width of ditch 2.00 feet Depth of ditch 2.00 feet use 12 depth for area calc, = 1.000 It equivalent depth Surface area per If of ditch = 4.00 uare feet r; Required length of ditch Total volume of ditch 333 cubic feet �... Percent of voids 30.00% Diameter of pipe 6.0 inches E r Usable volume of pipe 16.3 cubic feet Usable volume of ditch 95.0 cubic feet Total usablevolume-• ---. aa safety factor of 2, doubling the length of the ditch to User 166 It T ength of ditch required per 100 sf of new impervious 2.231 It Attached is a sketch showing the infiltration trench cross section. Trench should be located in a landscape area close to the test holes locations. /7-0 r 0 Arlo 1 yA8'a pob oc�K •`` �J\t psto /I✓ RAMARo \ ro,\ j - 7460 s� A. - LEC1 S;TI/UG P i AripmoA AR1Ve WAY CONFIQ&Un1ti1-10►.j { I 'E 1 c- NT c ts, L- c s ,� 1 o 4 . S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Figure III-3.17 Roof Downspout System CB Trench) Roo i -( Trench -- CB Possible Alignments PLAN VIEW Not to Scale Observation Well / 6" Perforated Pipe ------=-------- 1 —v Roof drain .� .1W — — — — — — — -� Sump w/ -� Infiltration Trench solid lid Roof Roof Drain PROFILE VIEW nts Overflow Observation Well Splash block A Sheet Cover Material 1 1' min. -- _ _------- 1' min. 1 1 Fine V min. mesh 5' min. j...—� A Levol — screen CB Sump with 6" Perforated Pipe Solid Lid (CPEP single wall acceptable) varies 10' min. Observation Well (w/metal cap & lock) - _ Compact Backfill 4"-6" PVC Pipe 6" Perforated Pipe (4" acceptable (perforated) - for roof downspout systems) Wrap Trench Washed rock'/." Entirely With Filter Fabric SECTION A -A 2, i Not to Scale III-3-48 o Filter fabric shall be wrapped entirely around trench drain rock prior to backfilling. Method of Analysis/Length of Roof Downspout Infiltration Trenches The length of trench required is based on the assumption of providing a bottom trench area sized to Infiltrate at a rate equal to the rainfall intensity for the peak 10-minute time step for the 10-year, 24-hour duration design storm event (Time step 460 to 470 minutes, 5.4% of total storm volume P,o, see Table 3.5.1A), and by the maximum infiltration rate Q.) which Is based on the Soil Texture Class by the United States Department of Agriculture (U.S.D.A.) designation system (see Figure 4.5.1E and Table 4.5.1A). The length of trench required is determined by dividing the required infiltration area (AJ by 4 feet (the two -foot trench widith plus one foot on either side for side wail infiltration). A, is computed using the following equation: An _ (0.054 P,oAp)/10 IM 7 ; Where: P,o = 10-Year, 24-hour design storm total precipitation, inches (from Figure 3.5 t 71 IM = the maximum infiltration rate from Table 4.5.1A, min./inch. Ap a area of the roof tributary to the system, ft'. (Note: a typical single-family --'side s a roof area of approximately 2,000 fe.) Therefore, the trench length required is: L = (A,/4 (feet); in feet TABLE 4.S.1A MAXIMUM INFILTRATION RATES FOR ROOF. DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS Maximum Infiltration Rates \'M)• Soil Texture Gass (U.S.D.A.) (Inches per Hour) (inches Per Minutes) 1. Coarse sands or Cobbles 20.00 0.333 2. Medium sand 8.27 U.T38 3. Fine sand, loamy sand 2.41 0.040 4. Sandy loam, 1.02 0.017 5. Loam 0.52 0.009 *From a study of over 5,000 soil samples under -carefully controlled procedures by the U.S.D.A. (Rawls, Brakensick and Saxton, 1982). Example: Proposed residence located at Kent East Hill Roof area 2,000 square feet; Soil Texturepass = loamy sand; IM = 0.040 Inches per minute; P,o = 2.9 Inches f A, _ (0.054 P,0Ap)/10 IM =((0.054)(2.9)(2,000))/((10)(0.040)) = 783 fe K = A,/4=(783)/(4) Rg JW: (Note; could be accomplished by two trenchs). t /4n PLANNING DATA SITE ADDRESS: * -7 2 Z4:,4"— Si . SuJ DATE: 1;3/ 5—Z 5 ZONING: 5 /2 f-TdUAM#: PROJECT DESCRIPTI SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front:;Z6_Left Side:__Jo Right Side:0 Rear:2 IS Actual Setbacks: Front: 1?D Left Side: `fig Right Side: Zog Rear: 6, FLOOR AREA: LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: �bo Actual: 1&,,, 5 o BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: 36 1,61) 5 Actual Height: 5110 SUBDIVISION: N/A CRITICAL AREAS #: <fA - 15 — 30 ItAh 05�z SEPA DETERMINATION: �ar�c�.9 ►ram-, LOT AR OTHER: Plan Review By: CA FILE NO. C� Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 107 2 % ZUS-i 6 2. Property Tax Account Number: ZSZ"203 —3 - 103 Mb ? 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Z . Lt RECEIVED 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; -Zno. FEB 1 7 1995 If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. FERMff =MR Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: O ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: J G _; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in. the floodway floodplain k_A,_.j of a water course. 9. Site contains a creed or an area where water flows cross the grounds surface? Fl ws are year- round?� Flows are seasonal? hat time of year? F ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow X; shrubs )� ed 1SL— , urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: . ForCity Staff Use Only 1. Site is Zoned? /S s - %2 .2.- SCS mapped soil type(s)? 17sal✓i /04.V., .0 -Ar... ive 3. Wetland inventory or.C:A. map indicates wetland present on site? AI/O_ 4. .Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map'indicates Critical Area on site? S. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? 6 : - • ,Site designated on the Environmentally.Sensitive Areas Map? :DETERMINATION y.STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by: J2. V Wanner CONDITIONAL WAIVER 2,--2 7 -f'r Date Rev 00/roro3 City .of .Edmonds . "'Cr.i.ticai Areas Checklist- The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge' (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant:(}-�` 9C@^\ I)Me S Applicant Representative: l_e, i'p Name PC) Street Address 6-8 mono z63/ City, State, ZIP Phone Ci Sig �ture Date Name Street Address City, State, ZIP Signature Phone Date CITY of EDIVIONDS 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works CERTIFIED MAIL 10727 226th Street S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Sewer Connection for Property Located at 10727 226th Street S.W., Edmonds The matter of your sewer connection for the above refer- enced property has been investigated by the Engineering and Water/Sewer Divisions -of -the Public Works Department. Since the property does not directly abut the City sanitary sewer main, it is recommended that you petition for a Local Improve- ment District (L.I.D.) with the surrounding neighbors. There- fore, a petition and sketch illustrating the.area to be sewered is enclosed. For information related to the petition for this L.I.D., please contact Mr. Richard Allen, Assistant City Engineer, at 775-2525, extension;i-220. Sincerely, LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works jt Enclosure V • H December 17, 1.976 No,40 TO: Public Works - Sewer Department FROM: Leif R. Larson City Engineer SUBJECT ITMAINING SlVER CONVECTIONS REFERRED TO TILE ENGTNITRING DEPT.- We have examined the 19 remaining sewer connections referred to this department, and have the .following recommendations to make:. 1) 213 Elm Street (Dimmick) The existing residence is too lou to reach the sewer in T?lm Street, and it would be difficult to construct a sewer to Second Avenue. It is' recommended that a waiver be granted subject to proper fimcti.oning of the septic system, pending the develo�men.t of property adjoining Second Avenue, �,rherei.n a combined .sewer arrangement would alloy! this residence to make connection. 2) 931 Niain Street (Nelson) This, property can connect .to the sanitary sewer, however, the soil conditions.adjacent to the sewer lateral at )Iain Street indicate potential problems with the -sewer hookup.. n 1.,aiver is recomrended subject to the proper functioning of the septic system, and subject to connecting to sewer if future development of the property. or plumbing; additions occur. 3) 806 Ninth Avenue South (Yeager) This property does not have gravity seurers available and would hest be served through an L.I.D. with gravity sewers to riglith Avenue. 4) 716 Ninth Avenue Soutli (P hxrdock) This property is not served by sanitary sewer. It is recommended that an L.I.D. he formed with.gravity sewers flowing to Eighth Avenue. 5) 929 Car, FZoad (Strickland) There exists a problem related to utility casements and the estate . settlement of business prior to Mr. Strickland's death. It is recommended that a waiver be granted subject to completion of the utility easement, proper functioning of the septic system, and no further developmentof the property until sewer hookups are provided. Memo to: lollic 'Wort s Sewer Departmenr_ • Page 2 12/17/7G (continued) 6) 6502 170th Street S.PI. (Tyres) 71iis property is adjacent to the Lynnwoocl think sewer, however, no lateral exists. in Olympic View ])rive. .The owners have had some. difficulty in arranging for the lateral extension i.n,the street right-of-way.. It is. recommended that,the'City request them to contact three contractors and provide evidence of the contractor's estimate or refusal. to accomplish the work proposed. Should that evidence indicate the unavailability of a con- tractor to do the wort:, it is recommended that the City proceed with a lateral connection, charging the resident for the actual: cost -of work. (See next connection.) 7) 6510 170th Street 5.19.. (l.>hthegrove) 'Mis residence adjoins the Avres residence, and could, jointly use a sewer lateral. 'The -recommendation .for #6 applies to this residence. 8) 18506 76th Avenue blest (Cline Scuba Shoji) A lateral was not .installed to this particular property tinder .tile., 76th Avenue street project.. Later, the City installed a lateral from the north but inadvertently.constructed the lateral on private property. Attempts have been made to acquire an easement without results. .This matter needs further study in acquiring an easement from either the owner to the north or south to gain sewer service without removing street -or walk improvements. It is recommended that a waiver be granted until the City can provide a sewer connection point. 9) 20216 76th Avenue hest (11le1cli) This property is not serve(T with a sewer lateral. in 76th Avemie, This sewer connection will require an easement over adjoining property to connect to sewers to the west.. Further study is required on this easement made by the City. It. is recommended. that a waiver be granted subject to the City arranging for a sewer connection point,. 10) City Park (Third and Pine) Tlie present restroom is more than 200 ft..from the sewer and is below the sewer elevation. It is recommended. that a waiver he granted subject to proper functioning of the septic :system. Also, any changes to the plltunb- ing which would expand the use ' (or should other regul.ati.onsoutside the City apply) , a ptur) should be installed and connection made to the trunk. sewer running through the Park playfield. 11) .10521 226th Street S.W. (Jarvis) This property is located in the vicinity of Olymp. ic. View 1'later Dist. sewers. However, the prolcrty does not directly abut' the sever or have access to the connection point. It is recommend.ed.that this property participate -in an L.I.1). with thesurrounding neighbors for.tompletion of the hookup. r Memo to: Plic- Worhs Sewer. Department • Page 3 12/17/76 (continued) 12) 1.0605 226th Street S.W. (Johnston) 13) 10607.226th Street S.W. (Kemp) 14) 10611 226th Street S.W. (Sisom) 15) 10727 226th Street S.W. (Jatho) Recommendation for Item 11 will apply to the above locations. 16) '718 Ninth Avenue South This property is not served by sanitary server. It is recommended that an L.I.D. he .formed with. gravity sewers .flowing to P,i.ghth. Avenue. 17) 528 Eighth Avenue North' (Schroeder) This property does not abut a sanitary sewer. It is recommended'. that this property be included in an L.I.n. to serve- surrounding proper- ties. 18) 20222 76th Avemie , North . (I',tcDonald Log Cabin) This property is in the process of receiving a. City approved subdi- vision for. duplexes, and plans.for removal of the existing log house. It is recommended that a waiver be granted on the existing house. Any new construction will then .follow the Subdivision and Building codes requiring hookup. 1.9) 7400 212th Street S.W. (Kenmore Pre -Mix) With .low usage rate and extent of lot size, it is recommendedthat a waiver be aranted.3f_the property should be developed beyond its present usage, a sci.�er connection would be required. JHA/ is _ Date June 6, 1974 Memo to: Director of Maintenance & Operation Public Works From: City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Legal Description: W 2f S 2, S 2, NW4, SWk-„ SW4f Sec. 25, T 27 N, R 3E NOTE: Connection charge per waiver of Late Comer charges (see letter of 6-14-68 226th Street Sanitary sewer file) RECEIVED JUN 7 1974 Commonly known as: 10727 226th St. S.W. Owner: Mr. Jatho Z.F.F. Calculation: ( ) Z.F.F. x ( ) Lateral x ( )Unit x ( $25 )_ cc: Mr. Jatho $ Connection Fee $ Lateral Charge $ 25.00 Trunk Charge $ 10.00 Permit $ 35.00 TOTAL Form 6 • • Date June 6, 1974 Memo to: Director of Maintenance Operation Public Works From: City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Legal Description: W zf S Z, S 2,. NW',, SW , SW4, Sec. 25, T 27 N, R 3E NOTE: Connection charge per waiver of Late Comer charges (see letter of 6-14-68 226th Street Sanitary sewer file) Commonly known as: 10727 226th St. S.W. Owner: ter. Jatho Z.F.F. Calculation: ( ) Z.F.F. x ( ) Lateral x ( ) Unit x ( $ 25 ) _ cc: (fir. Jatho $ Connection Fee $ Lateral Charge $ 25.00 Trunk Charge $ 10.00 Permit $ 35.00 TOTAL 1 Form 6 4 ' r a R Alto Fmrk Avg. H. f � �'.� , .ram'.- J�.f'1'.:"''/• "t^ r PROOMSQT F,4107 __ �J -,.. .�.A.1.�.�. ,•'4T„+f . ��. ' �`..�t �,-- -_ 'r•f.i"',��J_„t�rJ 6'lr: fi.. .•1 .1 rn.,... .. '` ..'� • Office of the City Engineer Leif R. Larson Mr. Charles, Pinnell Roberts, Shefelman, Lawrence, Gay 6 Moch 1818 IB14 Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Dear Mr. Pinnell: CITY, 4F EDMONDS Snohomish County, Washington June 14, 1968 Reference is made to your letter of June 4, 1968, requesting the City of Edmonds confirm in writing that Mrs. Judkins and Dr. and*Mrs. Blandau's properties not be charged late -comer assessments. The City of Edmonds in accordance with the provisions indicated in a letter of November 28, 1967 to the commissioners of the Olympic View Water District, hereby waives the late -comer charges on the following described properties Owner Description Mrs. Judkins: The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.;•f. Dr. and Mrs. Blandau: That portion of the SW 1/4 of 111•7 1/4 of SW 1/4 Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at a point on the S. line of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 262.90 feet E. of the S; corner thereof; thence E along S. line thereof 54.2 feet to the southerly line of State Road No. 1-lu, thence P;orthwesterly along an arc to the right having a radius of 995.37 feet a distance of 71.66 feet; thence S parallel to i•7 line of said NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 46.47 feet to point of beginning; EXCEPT any portion thereof contained within the 1•7 2 acres of S 5 acres of S.-7 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4. r, ChariPan nell 6/14/68 Page 2 All that portion of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Of SW 1/4 • Of Section 25, Township 279 North Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of SW 1/4 Of SW 1/4 of said Section 25, thence E along N line of said SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 289.90 feet more or less to county road; thence Southeasterly along said county road 200 ft. thence Southwesterly 300 feet to a point which is 300 feet E and 321.83 feet South from the NW cor- ner of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of said section; thence W 300 feet to West line of said subdivision; thence North along said I -lest line of said subdivision 321.83 feet to true point of beginning; EXCEPT the North 35 feet of W. 262.9n feet thereof. The present property owners or future owners will be required to pay the City's permit and sewer trunk fee, which at the present time is $10-00 per permit and $25.00 per consumer unit connected. This fee is subject to change by ordinance only. LRL/1c cc - James A. Murphy City Attorney Public Works Department Very truly yours, CITY.OF.EDMONDS LEI[-'R. LARSON City. Engineer CD 22 21 1, 20 -j 24 CL 9 25 31 Q0 .30 32 26 ,7 2 3 27 28 29 13th WAY 35 3 -C'z 9 J 41 40 39 38 37 36 3 -OPL x ow I tp 14 15 '16 'ti J� . 7 ov, 6 M P, ZT TH u 44 UM ED � 7 18 3 16 L 226th PL. S.W. .15 22 P/ ?o 5 k, 14 6. 13 LJ 7 7 12 25 2 T 2 6 24J 25 _16 CD 0 ? '7 ()z -T -2r -----228th ST S.W. 26 25 0 -r E Z S E- E7 0 EE3- ��� 35 --2)6o &ua c— c -r- I ROUTING:. Name Initial Da te Name n tia ate I 2 3 4 INITIATOR: ' Name Phone Address ACTION: •f i A11 concerned notified ❑ Action Completed q _•c'�-ortyIs ? `al descr-------� on is. Woht� fGy_, °the the Sc,-.- half of action ''„J l- Sir= of. t ,oanshi: - Nor W .1� o t; t.h a' W.M. nt� ,sh n• y o= -"ohomish, S _ • n� � { d Jr ^ • ice.... �.. 1:.-:�.. n� •.^� _ ,.. j. •ra 1, -tom - ' - l PR L C:+i:+.:•:.'�....:�`:: ... _...�.G.-:......., ........r.y.�..... ..ems- i+t: 'V:` w.�%4A_^'.0a�-... ��s�,►'..-._—...._tt .'--------- Office ..�_-... of the City Engineer CITY OF E D'I O N D S Leif R. Larson Snohomish County, Washington June 14, 1968 Mr. Charles Pinnell Roberts, Shefelman, Lawrence, Gay 6 Moch ,. 1818 IBM Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Dear Mr. Pinn(--11•: Reference is made to your, letter of Jur,e 4, 1.968, requesting the City of Edmonds confirm in wri-tinF; that 14rs. Judi ns and Dr. rand' Mrs. B.landau's properties not be chrar,;ed late -comer as ,essments. The City of l;dmonds in accordance with the prov.isic,;is indicated in a letter of. November 28, 1967 to the commi sioners of the Olympic View Water District, hereby waives the late -corer charges on the following described properties: Owner Description Mrs. Judkins : The Srri 1/4 of the ld;;' 1/4 crf the SW 1/4 of the 1 f SW 1/4, Section 2.5, 27 ;forth, Range 3 East, W.M. Dr. and Mrs. Bl.andau: That portion of the S}.1 1/i) of Ntd 1/4 of SW 1/4 5ect.i.on 25, Tow jr lh.ip '27 North, Range 3 East, W.M. , dC :cri hed rh , f-(�l 1 ows : Pep i rn, i n}, at ra ( "I n t' rill 1 iw I l hlr. r•i :..i id PIVI 1 /hl eA t'li,t i1,. U1 Ulu !"'I Curl., r' t11CCer)f; thence i; along S. l.i.n:: thereof 54.2 }:eet to the southerly 1._nc of State Road No. thence t:orthwe ,tarty along an a_•c to tihe right hrz.v;.nv, a radius �'. J'-,5.37 feet ri distance of 71.66 feet; thence S paral'-el to i•1 Line of said /141 1/1; of S;' 1/4 45.}=7 feet to point of beginning; T..XC!:"T any portion thereof contained within the 41 2 acres of S 5 acres of S;1 1/4 of NW 1/1' of '-U 1./lf. Mr. Charles Pinnell 6/14/68 Jai 4!a ri.fl� R f ''to All that portion of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township :7, North FanKc 3 E'nst, N.M., described as follc>ws: Beginning at tho NW corner of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of said Section 25, thence E along N line of said SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 289.90 feet more or less to county road; thence Southeasterly along said county road 200 ft; thence ^outhwesterly 300 feet to a point which is 300 feet E and 321.83 feet South from the NW cor- ner of SV] 1/4 of SW 1/4 of said section; thence W 300 feet to West line of said subdivision; thence North along said West line of said subdivision 321.83 feet to true point of begirining; EXCEPT the North 35 feet of W. 262.90 feet thereof. The present property owners or future owners will be required to pay the City's permit and sewer trunk fee, which at the present time is $10.00 per permit and $25.00 per consumer unit connected. This fee is subject to change by ordinance only. Very truly yours, CITY.OF E DMONDS LEIF.'R. LARSON City Engineer LRL/lc cc - James A. Murphy City Attorney Pulillc Works Department Page 2 REGARDING: 10727 - 226th Street S.W. -703 Gacoca a ress R E C O R D O F C O N T A C T S NAME, PHONE NO.; DATE ADDRESS of CALLER CONID�QVTS 5/l/74 James Jatho Certified Letter No. 406388 sent requiring hook-up within 60 days. 5/7/74 Received connection fee memo from Engr. stating fee of $35 only. Per waiver of Late Comer charges. • ACTION TAKEN Letter received. Referred to Engr. for further investigation. INITIALS TE TE eo>-aes-ooLGI :odoo 11VW IVNOIIVN831NI 80d ION IL61 jdV (epis jay+o oaS) ,.—0301A08d 30V83AOO 30NVHnSNI ON 008E w'o- Sd .......... (paj!nbaj eel ojsxe) A83AII30' 1V103dS pog AINO 33SS3800V Ol 83A1130 aS8 PSE -' Ogg ''""""" SI """""" Aluo aassaJppe oI AJOA110p 411M PaiaAllap 8,194M pue 83ep 'We4M of SM04S 'Z a A!uc DassaJppe 01 AJaA11ep yl!M ••". paiaAllap slap pue woyM o3 sMoyS 'l S33IA83S 1d1303tl Htl013tl �� R -`�� `-- -- _ S33d 1VN011100tl tl0! S301Atl3S 1VHOIlaO -� 0 Z 0 8 6 S, �NOl J( I WS VM • SONOW03 w a -a `:MS' H19Z?- L ZLOT 00 O 'D SDWVf 4OH1Vf 00 3ia. tlb��\`� - UU07.0—E0L >Itiv>M;tso (delsod sn1�o0£riivw a31J11833 M03 1d13. 3 J"i�ll)ER: Be s6re. to follow Insfrucfions on other s� ' �> PLEASE1,1ANIS4 SERVICE(S)� .INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) (AddetionaZ oharges,regttired fon tlieao sarvicea) e 'Show address; Deliver ONLY ❑' where delivered . :,to addressee IECEIPT Reeet ed fhe,,nu 6 ed article described ®low REGISTERED''NO:, . SIGNATUR O.R'NAME OF ADD ESS E (Must always be.tilled In) CERTIFIED' NO. 1 x �'�', 2 khE, F A RE E'S AGENT, -IF ANY .INSURED . NO . - DATE 'DELIVERED SHOW. WHERE DELIVERED i(Onl'U if requeated,.aud include ZIP Code), Mr. Charles Pinnell Roberts, Shefelman, Gay 6 Moch 1018 IBM building Seattle, Washington Dear Mr. Pinnell: Lawrence, 98101 June 14, 1968 Reference is made to your letter of June 4, 1968, requesting the City of Edmonds confirm in writing that tars. Judkins and Dr. and Mrs.. Blandau's properties not be charged late -comer assessments. The City of Edmonds in accordance with the provisions indicated in a letter of November 28, 1967 to the commissioners of the Olympic View Water District, hereby waives the late -cosier charges on the following described properties: Owner Description Mrs. Judkins: The SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the Sly 1/4, Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East$ H.M. Dr. and Mrs. Blandau: That portion of the Ski 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Section 25, Township 27 Horth, Range 3.East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at a point on the S. line of said NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 262.90 feet E. of the SW corner thereof; thence E along S. line thereof 54.2 feet to the southerly line of State Road No. 1-W, thence northwesterly along an arc to the right having a radius of 995,37 feet a distance of 71.66 feet; thence S parallel to W line of said NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 46.47 feat to point of beginning; EXCEPT any portion thereof contained within the H 2 acres of S 5 acres of Sit 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Sli 1/4. Mr. Charles Pinnell 6/14/68 Page 2 All that portion of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Section 25, Township 27, North Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Nib corner of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of said Section 25, thence E along N line of said SW 1/4 of. SW 1/4 289.90 feet more or less to county road; thence Southeasterly along; Said county road 200 ft; thence Southwesterly 300 feet to a point which is 300 feet E and 321.83 feet South from the NW cor- ner of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of said section; thence W 300 feet to West line of said subdivision; thence North along said West line of said subdivision 321.03 feet to true point of beginning; EXCEPT the North 35 feet of W. 262.90 feet thereof. The present property owners or future owners will be required to pay the City's permit and sewer trunk fee, which at the present time is $10.00 per permit and $25.00 per consumer unit connected. This fee is subject to change by ordinance only. Very truly yours, CITY Or EDMONDS LEIr R. LARSON City Engineer LRL/lc cc - James A. Murphy City Attorney Public Works Departmentk CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT f p Public Works. • Planning • Parks and Recreation . Engineering 890_lq Mailed 3/22/95 March 21, 1995 STREET FILE Chuck. Lee Design Consultants P.O. Box 1306 Mukilteo, Wa. 98275 RE: JOHANNSEN REMODEL AT 10727 226TH ST EDMONDS STORM DETENTION REQUIREMENTS Dear Chuck, After reviewing the subject permit application, we have determined that on -site detention will be required because the additional impervious exceeds 2,000 square feet. Based on the drawings submitted, the total additional impervious surface is 6,287 square feet. It has been City policy to include quantities of remodeling when an existing structure is removed and then reconstructed, and to not allow credit for prior impervious surfaces. The existing portion of the house that remains does not have to be included in the detention design, only the additional impervious surfaces. Since the quantity exceeds 5,000 square feet, an engineer must design the detention system using Snohomish County standards of the Y and W method for a 25-year storm and 10-year release. Please submit a drainage plan showing the location of the system and where it will tie into the existing City storm system. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-0220. Sincerely, E9/1"/ Walker Addison L. Chrisman n!: Engineering Inspector ALC/sf c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan