Loading...
110 3RD AVE N.pdfReceived bv,* Permit No. Pt Gruwell, Meg From: Walker, Jim Sent: Friday, September 10,1999 8:51 AM To: Bullock, Steve; Gruwell, Meg; Hyde, Gordy; Miller, Raymond; Zukowski, Maryanne z �; Subject: FW: Required Parking per ECDC Section 18.95.020 r ¢ Reply from Scott Snyder to parking question. LU V; V ® —Original Message— cn j From: W. Scott Snyder ISMTP:ssnyder@omwlaw.coml =j Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 8:44 AM -J t^! To: 'Walker, Jim' to O Subject: RE: Required Parking per ECDC Section 18.95.020 I would start with the question (as does the ordinance): "is there rid z sufficient lot area for the number of spaces (at full size) necessary to " meet the total parking requirement for all (again the total) of uses, dt original and proposed for lease, within the building?" If the answer is no, ix— _ that settles it. If the answer is yes, it looks like the owner can provide z }-' the required parking through a mixture of spaces. w W -----Original Message----- ? From: Walker, Jim rmailto:Walker n.ci.edmonds.wa.usl Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 8:28 PM O — To: W. Scott Snyder o ~ Cc: Hyde, Gordy; Cindy Bouldin - Edmonds; Zukowski, Maryanne; Miller, _Lu Raymond W a; Subject: Required Parking per ECDC Section 18.95.020 _ zi U = The Parking Lot Construction section ECDC Section 18.95.020 A.I. states "The o t- applicant must provide an aggregate parking area of sufficient size to z provide all the required parking spaces at the full width dimensions. If the applicant satisfies this condition, the applicant has the following two choices for meeting the minimum standards for off-street parking dimensions within this aggregate area: a) all at full width method, or b) mixture of full width/reduced width method." i A building was constructed with sufficient parking area for 23 full width dimension spaces. There were additional reduced width spaces created with the development. The requirement was for 22 spaces with the uses proposed by the applicant. The owner of the building now wants to lease space to tenants with higher parking requirements. Engineering's interpretation has been that the compact spaces created can not be used to meet the parking © required by code. Can the code be interpreted to allow the existing reduced width spaces to count for the parking required by code? a t i U) LL 0 LU 2 � 12 -1 LL < D T) xW z LU LAJ 0- a h- LM LL LU OF nil U) W .J �o w } Lt FFBI d, xW � x z z a LU a � o U W W u. p —z U) o~ z iE Uale: rebruary 1tS, 1999 To: Jamal Mahmoud, Traffic Engineer CC: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor Jim Walker, City Engineer Jeannine Graf, Building Official Ola Grosset, Builder Larry Naughten, Listing Agent From: Meg Gruwell, Planner Subject: Parking at Soundview Plaza,110 — 3ra Avenue N. I There have been a number of different memorandums and letters circulating with differing parking requirements and different floor space figures for the Soundview Plaza, located at 110 — 3`d Avenue N., which is being constructed under building permit #980471. The following is our best estimate to date, given all of the information submitted. All parking for retail or office uses are based on gross floor area, not just the office area. For the first floor I have relied on Ola Grosset's calculations that the leasable areas are 1550 and 1501 square feet and the common area is approximately 600 square feet (Ola scaled this off the floor plan) for a total of 3651. The second story calculations are from the leasable area shown on the plans as 2888 and 1788 square feet, and Warren Lafon's calculations that the common area on that floor is 835 square feet. This results in a total second floor area of 5511 square feet. It has been pointed out that this does not match the area shown on the plans submitted, which as revised on 7/22 were 4410 square feet of retail, and 5610 square feet of office space, but we are relying on the applicant and builder to have provided us with updated and accurate information. w.amr.�,.n, rnic.w(YaePd;Nfo+xrt@^,.,iJ�;FrRz;it�tiFl7, The following are the required parking for various proposed uses. The required spaces for retail is one space per 300 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.1). The required spaces for offices providing on -site customer service is one space per 400 square feet (ECDC 17.50,020.B.5). The required spaces for offices with NO on -site customer service is one space per 800 square feet (ECDC 17.50.020.B.6). We have been given conflicting information about what the use of the first floor will be. Ola Grosset has said that it will only be office use with no on -site customer service. Larry Naughten in a letter dated February 16, 1998, states that the use will be mixed, either office or retail. In order to allow future use of the first floor as retail, parking requirements would be as follows: TO PRESERVE ABILITY TO HAVE RETAIL ON FIRST FLOOR 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit _ 2nd Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 800 sq. ft. = 15t floor Retail use: 3651 sq. ft. @ 1 space / 300 sq. ft. = TOTAL i If, as Ola Grosset states, only offices with no on -site customer service is to be provided, then the following are required: s ALLOWING ONLY OFFICE USES WITH NO ON -SITE CUSTOMER SERVICE 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / unit = 10 spaces 2na Floor office space: 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space ! 800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces I" floor office use: 3651 sq. ft. @ I space t 800 sq. ft. = 5 spaces TOTAL 22 spaces If only 22 spaces are provided which meet the City Code requirements, we will place a fluorescent memo in the file that only office uses with no on -site customer service will be allowed on both the first and second floors. We would also like to see the owner providing that information to all proposed tenants. Not providing adequate full-sized parking spaces will have a definite impact on uses allowed in the future. The applicant and owner should consider this very carefully before finalizing their parking plan. It would probably be useful to have an as -built of the parking to insure that how many spaces meet code requirements. If you have any further questions, please contact me Monday, Tuesday (afternoon), or Thursday at extension 330. Thank you. to tray view riaza. a. First Floor .... 3000 SF and the use will be mixed, either office, or retail. In order to comply we should figure retail. One parking space per 400 Sf= 8 spaces b. Second Floor ... 4,800 SF and the use is office. One parking space per 1000 SF = 5 spaces c. Third Floor.. Five condominiums = 10 spaces The above represents a need for 23 spaces... It appears that there are enough parking spaces to meet the above requirements. The question is are the present spaces the proper dimensions to meet the city's parking stall codes. 0 2. Existing parking dimensions. Mr. Markizinis will provide you this information from the plans that he has. Regards, Larryf;�g teen X,sting agent C-�- j X.,Uve 7=M 7W, RM 0 At W010. City of Edmonds Owl M Community Services Department Engineering Division F:VSNGRVAMAL%GmdyDRble-2.DW - Lui LU -j (0 LL LU 0 2 � C? LL. LU: z � 0 z 1--, � LU W�, pf 0 Lul !:0 L- z LU (j) 0 z E to Group R Residential Group S3 Parking AK64 CONSTRUCTION TYPE V 1 HR. .(sprinkled y. 2 STORIES w/ 'BASEMENT PA,:X,,W*r (M,:52 AREA ALLOWED M, S2 & S3 14,000 SF 8 & S3 14,000 SF R1 & 8 10,500 SE UBC 38,500 SF (SPRINKLED) 1994- Edition LIZ:)MIU LUNL ZONE 3 'ASIC WINDSPEED 80 mph (exposure B) SITE AREA 120Vx120'0" = 14,400sf SITE COVERAGE 11,880 SF PARKING bar CARS REQ'D ETAIL 4410 SF @ 300 15 CARS <�,OFFICE -B45-T*SF O 800 = 7,9" CARS ,4'CONDOS 01410 10,e CARS h- 6CARS CARS SHOWNa3 CARS,, OCCUPANCY RATIO OFFICE/RETAIL = 11,080.5 SF = 52.2% CONDOS = 10,127 SF = 47.8% SITE GRADING 3250 CUBIC YARDS .HEIGHT CALCS. x . y i S r A', '{. ..s.x. .uK:jaA.L'�hrii.{K.jw iLtieioi}ti::i/5.`dw'V'fuis.4arw...�...SS".........wwawv+aatetvaRw;�wsFw`ffi's'i17Zigxli5.'�13�'.�Y'-1tR�6i'[�Y�F.�iGruatIG"�v`�ji�dc'¢'.����Sd1'�.Ri4t}j:.�*tc%XrilT*114.TFF .. C Wilson! Jeff From: Gnnwell, Meg Sent: Tuesday, February og, ing s:56 PM To: Mahmoud, Jamai z Cc: Walker, Jim; Wilson, Jeff, Hyde, Gordy; Whitcutt, Roy uJi Subject: Parking at 110 - 3rd Avenue N. — Soundview Plaza Building Q, Ole Grosset called me today and told me the following: � f J�; • The first floor Wl be used only for office use that has no on -site customer service. • The gross square footage of the first floor is 1550 + 1601 + 600 = 3661 square feet — O LU Based on that, the required parking is: /800 62 ces �Condominiums:6511 51 sq. ft. @ 1 space /800 sace q. ft. = 7 spaces S W 6 units C 2 spaces / unit = 10 spaces z F- p TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 22 spaces z r' LU LUj If you have any further questions, please call me on Monday, Tuesday (afternoon) or Thursday at Extension 330. U 0 — O F,r i LL. Zy _ .. di i `j y 9 L� t 1 f5x } 1 t }f Gruwell, Meg To: Mahmoud, Jamal Cc: Walker, Jim; Wilson, Jeff; Hyde, Gordy; Whitcutt, Roy Subject: Parking at 110 - 3rd Avenue N. -- Soundview Plaza Building z j1 = z' UJ{ Ola Grosset called me today and told me the following: r LUc=i, • The first floor will be used only for office use that has no on -site customer service. 0 0; • The gross square footage of the first floor is 1550 + 1501 + 600 = 3651 square feet � Nf Based on that, the required parking is: wLL 0 1 st Floor: 3651 sq. ft. @ 1 space 1800 sq. ft. = 5 spaces g 2nd Floor: 5511 sq. ft. 0 1 space l800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces Condominiums: 5 units @ 2 spaces ! unit = 10 spaces d TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING: 22 spaces ur ; yIf you have any further questions, please call me on Monday, Tuesday (afternoon) or Thursday at Extension 330. � z UJ UJF o` 5 ww: LL- p! _ ZI ui N� C3 =i O� Z i ® F tY i r� ( f 4 A } f T ` } { Grtawell, Meg 990 All From: Gruwell, Meg i v 3 to Sent: Thursday, February 04,1999 3:26 PM To: Mahmoud, Jamal Subject: RE: Sound view Plaza @110 - 3rd Ave. N. oc The building you refer to, Soundview Plaza at 110 - 3rd Avenue N. has the following area/units and parking requirements: Uof 5 Condominiums ® 2 spaces/ unit = 10 spaces I 2nd Floor Office space 2888+1788+835= 5511 sq. ft. @ 1 space/800 sq. ft. = 7 spaces u,l 1st Floor Retail space 3015 sq. ft. ® 1 space/300 sq.ft. = 10 spaces _J TOTAL = 27 spaces cn � w O If the first floor calculations does not include the common area, then the calculations will be slightly off (i.e.: If the first floor is really 3400 sq. ft. when the common areas are included, then the parking requirements would be 11 spaces, for a grand U. total of 28 spaces.) Q, p ) cn y w. If the applicant now no longer plans to have retail in the first floor, but instead proposes to have office space, then the total will be one of the following: t-- With on -site customer service: Z F- 3015 sq.ft. @ 1/400 sq. ft. = 8 spaces (9 spaces if 3400 sq. ft,) u, u,! Grand total for building=10+7+8 = 25 spaces v Cs With NO on -site customer service: o 3015 sq. ft. ® 1/800 sq. ft. = 4 spaces (also 4 spaces if 3400 sq.ft.) ® t=' Grand Total for building=10+7+4 = 21 spaces U. oI hope that answers your question. If you need any further information, please let me know. f z LU V = ----Original Message— O f— From: Mahmoud, Jamai Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 3:02 PM To: Gruwell, Meg Cc: Walker, Jim; Hyde, Gordy Subject: Sound view Plaza @ 110 - 3rd Ave. N. ^ Friendly reminder. Tr- I would like to know TOTAL number of parking stalls required for the above development. i As you know, Mr. Ola Groset claims that the total number of parking stalls required is 20. And he is providing 33 parking stall. This means 13 parking stalls are extra. Thanks. 15 VA" SEEM 1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 9, 1999 To: Jim Walker Planning Roy Whitcutt Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud _Subject Parking configuration at 110 — 3`d Ave N. (Sound View Plaza) I met with Ola today at 10:00 AM February 9, 1999 and agreed to do the following: r 1 Find number of parking stalls REQUIRED for the development. Coordinate with planning department 2 Ola needs to submit drawing to the engineering department showing existing parking configuration on first and second floor 3 Once the engineering department receives the drawing, a decision will be made whether the required parking stalls meet the City of Edmonds code or not. Conclusion: The engineering department waiting to receive the following: 1 Number of parking stalls REQUIRED. Planning. 2 Existing parking configuration. Ola. City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division ©. " `t ,: �� Z u, j tr �M cn w J F„ (n LL w0 2� J U. j N O� w Z tS-, Z o ww C: V N! oLU l LjjF_ LL p 'Z ui vs U = o~ Z 0 Dear Mr. Groset: It has been brought to our attention that changes have been made to the Soundview Plaza building referenced above. We find no notes in the file approving these changes. Warren LaFon has provided drawings which he states he talked with John Bissell and Steve Bullock about and received a waiver shortly before John Bissell left the City. As stated above, we find no revised plans in the Building Permit application file, nor the Architectural Design Board file, nor any notes on the elevations stating that any revisions were approved. Even if John Bissell waived the changes shown on the drawings submitted today, what has been constructed is different from those drawings, including different railings, a window replaced by a sliding glass door, and an additional light placed by this door. We find that these changes are significant enough to warrant further review by the Architectural Design Board. Please submit drawings or pictures reflecting what has been constructed for review by the Architectural Design Board. Regarding the parking issue, this is to confirm what we had discussed on November 10, 1998 when you came into the office. To allow occupancy of the five condominiums and 2,888 square feet of office only, we calculated the following parking requirements: 5 Condominiums @ 2 spaces / Condo = 10 spaces 2888 sq. ft. office @ I space / 800 sq. ft. (no on -site customer service) = 4 spaces Total = 14 spaces required for only the uses described above Provided = 19 spaces in the Iower parking area If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220. I will be in the office on Monday, Tuesday (afternoon), and Thursday of each week. Sincerely, Meg GYuwell, AICP Planner cc: Warren LaFon, Architect 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan K--2 Boardmember Oaklief stated that he liked the building design and the changes that the applicant has made. Boardmember Sullivan agreed and stated that the proposal is consistent with the use. IT WAS MOVED BY BOARDMEM 3ER SULLIVAN, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER CHALUPNIK, TO APPROVE ADB-96-2 AS SUBMITTED, WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: THAT THERE WILL NOT BE A POND AND THAT THAT AREA WILL BE FILLED IN WITH SOD; AND THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF TWO DOGWOOD TREES AND THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING RHODODENDRONS. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-96-106 NEW DRIVE -THROUGH ESPRESSO BUILDING Jack Trogdon 21210 Highway 99 Jack Trogdon, 19517 81 st Place W., Edmonds, was present. John Bissell presented the staff report and stated that this proposal is for a new freestanding building, located on a site currently developed with a printing business, which will be designed to allow for cars to drive up on two sides for coffee service. The application was previously reviewed by the.Board and was denied because the materials did not seem to clearly represent the proposal, and because the design did not appear to be consistent with the surroundings nor with the requirements of the landscaping ordinance. The applicant is proposing a triangular building design in order to accommodate vehicle traffic circulation on the site and around the building. The building will have a flat roof with driftwood white lapped siding and green wood trim. No new exterior lighting is being proposed. Signage will include a painted wood sign located on the building below the service windows. The proposed sign has red letters on the white background of the building and will be 4 feet high, where 14 feet is allowed, and 12 feet in area, where 15 square feet is allowed. An additional 0.5 square foot red neon sign is proposed for the window of the building. Mr. Bissell noted that in order to approve this proposal, the Board must find that the application is consistent with the requirements of the Design Guidelines. There were no audience comments on this proposal. Boardmember Goodrick clarified that the location of the proposed planter boxes would face Highway 99, and asked about the side of the building which faces 212th. She also stated that a window box would add relief to the building as well. Jack Trogdon stated that hanging baskets will be utilized on the side which faces 212th due to the setback restrictions and to avoid any interference with vehicles. He also indicated that a window box might be in the way of vehicles driving up to the window for service. Boardmember Oaklief asked about the trim color and indicated that he would prefer that the entire parapet be painted with the same color as well. Mr. Trogdon indicated that his preference would be for a teal color rather than lime green as presented. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 3 January 15, 1997 INS cc w t�j JQ to a rnrn w LU m o' w U_ In �} zLU S Z F— �0 ww 2:) 0 U W F- r, u. p —Z u'i T c o~ Z 1*1 M Boardmembers agreed that teal would be a more agreeable trim color. Boardmember Pierce stated that the flowers in the planters should be rotated to ensure a consistent annual display of color and include some evergreen foliage as well. IT WAS MOVED BY BOARDMEM 3ER PIERCE, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER OAKLIEF, TO APPROVE ADB-96-106 AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: THAT THE COLOR TO BE USED IS TEAL; THAT THE APPLICANT STRIVES FOR A COMBINATION OF EVERGREEN AND ANNUAL PLANTINGS IN CONTAINERS ON THE SITE; AND THAT THE ENTIRE PARAPET BE PAINTED THE SAME AS THE TRIM AREA OF THE BUILDING. MOTION CARRIED WITH BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN ABSTAINING. APB-94-1131 NEW 30,000 SQUARE FOOT MIXED USE BUILDING INCLUDING INTERIOR PARKING, FOUR DWELLING UNITS AND COMMERCIAL TENANT SPACE Jim and Carrie Markezinis 110 3rd Avenue North Warren LaFon, 123 4th Avenue North, Edmonds, representative of the applicants, was present. John Bissell presented the staff report and stated that this proposal is for a new mixed use building on two lots, which are each 60 feet by 120 feet in size. The north lot is currently developed with a single- family residence, while the southern lot is vacant. He pointed out that the two lots must be legally combined through lot line adjustment or covenant prior to the issuance of a building permit. The proposed building will have a total interior space of approximately 30,000 square feet with 10,000 square feet each for parking, office space and four dwelling units. Mr. Bissell explained that the applicant has submitted a SEPA checklist and that the City has issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance, with mitigation required to offset traffic impacts. The applicant is proposing a brick building with three stories visible to the west (street side) and two stories visible from the east (alley side), with portions of the second floor (alley level) parking on the north, south and east sides being open. Commercial uses and parking will occupy the street level, with the commercial space fronting on the street and the parking behind. The alley level (2nd floor) will also have parking and commercial use, with the parking accessing the alley and the commercial space fronting on the street side. The third floor will house four residential units. Mr. Bissell stated that the bulk of the roof is flat, with portions proposed with a 4:12 pitch to give relief and added light to the dwelling units. An alternative design, using a barrel roll or arched type roof has also been proposed, however, this alternative design would require either a code amendment or a variance to be approved. The proposed building has considerable modulation and visual interest, accomplished through the use of a variety of shapes, including arched first floor windows, square second floor windows and peaked windows on the roof line. The north, south and west elevations also include decks with metal railings on the third floor and wall openings with pipe rail on the second floor. The barrel roll roof option also includes arched windows on the second floor, which tie the roof line through the second floor to the arches located on the first floor. He also explained that both design alternatives presented appear to be in compliance with Design Guidelines. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 4 January 15,1997 No site lighting or signing is proposed. A mixture of different colored red brick will be used for the exterior, with black aluminum window frames black and pipe railings. Since the building is in a zone which allows and encourages zero setbacks, and nearly completely fills the site, no landscaping i� is being proposed. A trash enclosure will be located in the building off the alley. UWJa Warren LaFon showed samples of the brick colors being proposed. He also presented color renderings of the two design alternatives and explained the features � U. U Q of each, including a nautical theme and the use of fiber optics to create prisms of light. Mr. LaFon also clarified the parking and pedestrian access. W w' w-J I --restaurant, o. Damon Platis, 4303 198th Street SW, Lynnwood, attorney for Mr. Gorman, owner of Clair's Pantry explained that his client is opposed to this proposal due to the fact that Mr. Gorman currently has an agreement with the Markezinis' to use a small portion of their property, located next door to his restaurant, for trash collection. He explained that if this proposal is approved, his client would not have space for trash collection and would not be j{; allowed to continue to operate his restaurant. W' Richard Eadie, neighboring property owner, spoke in favor of the proposal and the design alternative which included the rounded Z l=. roof. Z 01 ww ja Mr. LaFon clarified that Mr. Gorman's trash collection site was previously located on his own property, however, after remodeling his building, he U tn' made an agreement with the Markezinis' to Iocate his trash collection facility on their property. 0Hi LU w : Boardmember Pierce commented that he feels the building is well designed and would be an asset for the downtown area. He also indicated that he prefers the rounded — Z! modulation on the second design alternative and would support a recommendation that that option be used if possible. o z Boardmember Oaklief agreed and commented that the parking is particularly well designed for the downtown area. He also indicated that he the barrel prefers vault design if it is allowed, d suggested that he would like to see the brick continued up to the second floor with the use of stucco on the top floor only. Mr. Oaklief clarified that the location of the neighbor's trash enclosure is not an issue that the Board has authority over. i Boardmember Goodrick agreed with other Board comments and stated that she likes the design features { of the stucco with the brick, and that she too, prefers the barrel vault design alternative. ' Boardmember Sullivan commented that the sides of the building seem too long and out of balance and clarified some design features with Mr. LaFon. He also agreed that the barrel vault design alternative is © preferable, if possible, and that the parking design is very well done. Boardmember Chalupnik also agreed with other Boardmember comments and stated that he likes the design of the project and prefers the barrel vault design alternative as well. Boardmembers Sullivan and Oaklief discussed changing the exterior design slightly regarding the brick and stucco surfaces and the paint choices to be used. Mr. LaFon stated that the brick could be brought up t higher and rolled into the stucco area. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 5 ;a January 15,1997 -® I �: it 2 w=) J 0 U U) W LU U) LL wLL d� z ►- o � ww �o in LU Z U u. p z tt",� o~ z IT WAS MOVED BY BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER OAKLIEF, TO APPROVE ADB-96-113 WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: THAT IF CODE AMENDMENTS ALLOW A BARREL VAULT ROOF DESIGN, THAT THAT DESIGN WILL NOT REQUIRE A SEPARATE. APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD, AND THAT THE PREFERRED SIDING MATERIALS ARE AS OUTLINED IN EDIT B. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-96-153 NEW SIGNS FOR WELLS FARGO BANK Wells Fargo Bank 103 5th Avenue South Lee Matlick from Tube Art, 3025 NE 98th, Seattle, representative for the applicant, was present. John Bissell presented the staff report and explained that Wells Fargo Bank has purchased First Interstate Bank and is proposing to change the sign plan to conform to their colors and logos. The current sign plan consists of a non -illuminated monument sign at the corner of 4th Avenue So. and Dayton Street, two non -illuminated plastic -faced signs hanging down from the awning at the corner of 5th Avenue So. and Dayton Street, facing both streets, and an internally illuminated sign on the west side of the building facing the parking lot. The proposal includes replacing each of these signs with the same type and style as existing signs, but with the Wells Fargo colors and logos. Vinyl letters are proposed for the monument sign while the west elevation wall -mounted sign will be a plastic faced illuminated cabinet sign, and the marquee signs hanging from the awning will be plastic faced non -illuminated cabinet signs. All the signs will have orange letters on a burnt orange and black background with white logo. The monument sign will have an area of 11.92 square feet, where 32 square feet are allowed, and the wall signs and awning signs will have an area of 32.4 square feet, where 42.75 square feet are allowed. All signs are well below the maximum height limit. Existing landscaping is adequate. In order to approve this application, the Board must find that it is in compliance with the Design Guidelines found in the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. Lee Matlick clarified that a large portion of the sign is black, and will not emit any light, and that the sign dimensions are being reduced as well. There were no audience comments on this proposal. Boardmember Sullivan stated that both signs are appropriate as proposed. Boardmember Goodrick agreed and commented that the signage design is effective. i® Boardmember Oaklief agreed with other Board comments. IT WAS MOVED BY BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER PIERCE, TO APPROVE ADB-96-153 AS SUBMITTED' MOTION CARRIED. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 6 January 15,1997 r ' reaE�N�^fi n no 7�. • _.1 ..- ..„la..:f#A'..7 �li.eh..i12'u a%.s � 'tJ�tiM.UMLi f t P x t t i.{U.Ck(.{x'�(j�tSULe1'•YSa++'��i]i1'n'.Y..?� bma�4 .ww.w...�:�liuwfs6tYMPk:.YaXY. +4 a.�M�14YF���i9i ttlP%l4L!QJ.+vryfNil4'+".KvxaN.»kvv�r+.�m+..............". CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771.0221 p COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering fhc.1S9� ull Letter of Transmittal Lu �UJ� Date: December 13,1996 w� To: Environmental Review Section i LL d Department of Ecology N a PO Box 47703 x; Olympia, WA 98504-7703 z t-i z o Subject: .110 3rd Ave., N., Edmonds LU 04 o _ Transmitting Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance & Environmental Q �- Checklist uJ Jw F-� U. — z For Your Information: XX or As you requested: z For your file: Comment: j Note attachments: i Sincerely, 3 Diane Cunningham, Administrative Secretary cc: WSDOT Edmonds School District Community Transit Jim & Came Markezinis 8 ®. Warren LaFon r N Incorporated August 11, 1890 • 4 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan g; _ *,xmp,p AIS � •• 4414 "T �% Tt R J - .", to CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 t2o61 M.0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Construction of a new 30,000 square foot mixed use building with 51% of the building use for office and retail, and 49% for 4 residential dwelling units, along with 3,250 cubic yards of associated grading, and 35 parking stalls. (City of Edmonds File No. ADB-96-113) Proponent: Jim & Carrie Markezinis, 18826 Freemont Ave N, Shoreline, WA 98133 Location of proposal, including street address if any: 110 3rd Avenue North Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. xx This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 1 l o 1 Responsible Ofliciai:Jeffrev S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: ___...1_Q_� 1a14 Signatu .� ... , xx You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than �1 - / 4/ 1997, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about *the procedures for SEPA appeals. xx Posted on J2 / 7 3 11996, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. ADB%313.DW 12/1W63WA Page 1 of 2 yt 5 1 x JV ij Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:xx a 'Q XX Environmental Review Section Community Transit Department of Ecology Attn.: Brent Russell P.O. Box 47703 1133 164th Street Southwest, #200 Olympia, WA-98504-7703 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Z XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation XX Jim & Carrie Markezinis18826 Freemont Ave N _UJ TS 00 DaytonP/Land Developer Shoreline, WA 98133 H 15700 Dayton Avenue North �� Seattle, WA 98133 ui V� Warren LaFon ' XX Edmonds School District No. 15 123 4th Ave N U 01 Attn.: Bret Catistad, PIanning and Property Edmonds, WA 98020 to �� Manager Zn _! 20420 68th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 Ln Uj Q ; XX MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: U. C 1. THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE OF $1,094.00 h y FOR THE IMPROVEMENT TO THE INTERSECTION OF 9TH AVENUE AND MAIN STREET ? f" PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING. 5� VO Attachments O " O H, y v y pc: File No. ADB-96-113 LL SEPA Notebook h zI tii N; F Fi Z 1 i i Z S Zrr- D' o' " n Cn w' W Hi rn LL wQ a 1L = In d, S w: r Si z01 t- �. Z w wi 2 =): :n cli t3 13 w w. r u. p _z vs o~ z t® Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 30,000 SQUARE FOOT MIXED USE BUILDING WITH 51 % OF THE BUILDING USE FOR OFFICE AND RETAIL, AND 49% FOR 4 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, ALONG WITH 3,250 CUBIC YARDS OF ASSOCIATED GRADING, AND 35 PARKING STALLS; FILE NO. ADB-95-84 I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmentally sensitive map, the environmental checklist, site plans, building elevations prepared by Warren LaFon, Architect, dated August, 19, 1996, and traffic study prepared by Reid Middleton, Inc. and dated December 5, 1996, a copy of which are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I have recommended that a mitigated determination of nonsignificance be issued for the project. The traffic study prepared by Reid Middleton, Inc. has revealed an impact to the level of service at the intersection of 9th Avenue and Main Street. The City of Edmonds Transportation Plan has indicated the correction to the reduced level of service at that intersection will be to replace the four way stop sign with a traffic signal. The applicant has calculated the subject project share of the signalized intersection. The City concurs with the calculations presented by the traffic study. Based on my review of all information and adopted policies of the City, I have recommended that the proposal be changed or clarified to include the following mitigating measures so that a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) can be issued. Recommended Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant is required 'to contribute a traffic mitigation fee of $1,094.00 for the improvement to the intersection of 9th avenue and main street prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the proposed building. City of Edmonds c R Planning Division AD96113.DOC 1?l1:19b. 7 t y 4y}ikG T J 4VP i ti x,r ,x i t cl ..,..:...vwrtaNea�?W+...s...»...'T+"_'_lllcfy.:+.a..+.+.w`.r.:..—„_...:.:: ......'tsi.rnvv>MSNanbrUAi9gtYti�x✓+u+.+`.i..'•.L S ...,. .. •, t This recommendation is based on - adopted policies of the City as found in the Edmonds' Community Development Code (ECDC), Title 15. Specifically, the following apply: Policy The City of Edmonds Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan z discusses Level Of Service in Chapter 2. Page 32, of Edmonds Transportation .t y !j: Element states that "Edmonds Arterials will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better." The proposed signal light at the intersection of 9th Avenue and Main Street is required to maintain the LOS at level D. of These policies directly support the above mentioned mitigation measures and require these LU =1 measures in order to fully mitigate the impacts created by the proposal. Should you have any —1 F - questions concerning the information in this memorandum, please contact me. U. 0 W - LL q Review by Responsible Official O x eu i I concur: ✓'rr . o I do not concur: - t—. z t LU aj M ! Comments: j 0 i cWi i OI , ui cni ;.I o z i t _ c 2- Q 5 Jeffrey S. Wilson Date d - Attachments pc: File No. ADB-96-113 p / rr i Page 2of2 1 3 X 0 2. Name of applicants MM, 11►A MAIRKESUAIS- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (1597 1 G 1n?96Ma-T AVe. 1-4. 644. - To, ar UJ-Ay--Rst4 LpAt-4 - 1t2,--Hi-m(=- -t74-os:58o 4. Date checklist prepared: —Auer-,--gea, iqup I I 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT110-8-91.MASTER Page I of 26 ® IM u Z 15 D, L v o' W; J U) LL� fl w� � {III �1 �UJ z 1- 1- 0. z w w 7 V 0 LU - LL O �Z U O� z �01 RE ' l 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been i prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NaN� i , , (STAFF COMMEMS) 9, Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other' proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. b� 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) i 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your approval, if known. II L N'er . fi�Mrr I (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 04"ce 'Zµn r:!- �c3tJ.Da'S 3�d (STAFF COMMENTS) CH KLTJ 10-8.91.MASTER Page 2 of 26 Ma® i v � _ r 1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to i understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,'township,,and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries , of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic nap, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate naps or "? detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. DNS L&r t4 o RTH op 3 �`° MAir N —5T.@, t->0.k AL)c- d4. e A-r-rAc Fvsy fort (STAFr COMMENTS) X 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT s. i y B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEMTS 2. Earth a. General description of the site. p (circle one): Flat, rollin '� hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: / :5LoPfts APP2ox. 10' up 1520M ANT ( LS-r) (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? S 6Q (STAFF COMMENTS) t CHKIT/10-8.91.MASTER Page 3 of 26 k N W J Lo LL O N i H Z Z w C,) O 0 w S h LL F O z t r , c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, suck)? If you know the classification -of agricultural soils, specify then and note any prime farmland. (�u OTI�UINh1 (STAFF COMMENTS) a E c d. Are there surface indicationsor.history of unstable soils in the ;? immediate vicinity? If so, describe. I (STAFF COMMENTS) { � y e. Describe the purposia, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. j f. C H K LT/10.8-9 i . MASTER (STAFF COMMENTS) Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 4 of.26 U)LL W0 J U. U � W Z F- I_ O Z W W V d- F LU LL u. C _2 V rJ O F Z 01 t0 g• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? (STAFF COMMENTS) a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally' describe and give approximate quantities if known. GaN5-rrwc.?'to!g : 'bus-r + cam--- atx-rtoN eepu(pMENT ApM Au=A,c.oaiL.arz (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that slay effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) CH KLTt10-8-8 7 .MASTER Page 5 of 26 Cn LL O� w� Ji LL. = I = uJ. z r; F- O: w Eu! � o a0 a� z v' rF LL. O z U Z O F, z 0 C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: t.-o uG2 (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surfaces (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? I£ yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what - stream or river it flows into. t (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the: described waters? If yes, please describe available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands.and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N er4E- CHKLTtt 0-8-S I .MASTER Page 6 of 26 z 0 Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be 'discharged to ground water? Give general description, propose, and approximate quantities if known. IV CHKLT/10.8-91AASTER Page 9 of 26 (1) Z1 u1 w =: J N u_ wO LQ d, = w! h =1 Z h; E -, O; Z N w un � O! O O! U wLU t=- r �O _ Z o~ Z M t. .. .. ..........-......M.. r r.........�... mfAa���uorw.. ...+w.. _ ._....+.a._i... _ .. `t (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground, from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for examples Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) I l ' •i _ C. Water Runoff (including storm water): t 7 (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 1 (tau -ems W% VIM115 ' 7 (STAFF COMMENTS) 7 a ;t `i (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N� CHKLT110-8-81.MASTER Page 8 of 26 U) LL 0 2 �:C2LLI LL T) a I 31 z 1--� Oi z W LU: 2 =); :D CI L) 0 LIJ UJI LL 0 z 0 z to ------yater plants: water lily, ealgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be remove or altered? CHKLT/10-8-91.tMASTER Page 9 of 26 E!z t 0 CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 10 of 26 e (n LL 10 -J LL T) LU Z F- � 0 LULU LU LU 0— a a' U1 LL LL C uLU Cl, a 0 F Z b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. 140 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are Included in the fl plans of this proposal? (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? if so describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that miqht be reauired. CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER 26 Page 12 of 0 t M } ✓i S t a b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Z .t S Z, h- eu cc! L4 01 O; (STAFF COMMENTS) U 0 (n WI Wi =� -� h•i Cn U. UJ C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. cam» d =w. Z t- i- O w �! (STAFF COMMENTS) � Oi O 0l U O �, t OHS U J d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: J ZI U =, Z (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources ' a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? ® Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. _ �r�c7-2rce�-t — G�ExHTJ�t4 Ht-h- iag 4 4-S _ (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-81.MASTER Page ll of 26 by r+r��..,6AA^r ,•.._, .. z w .:. Ete I (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 4C as (STAFF COMMENTS) b. noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for examples traffic, equipment, operation, other)? (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. -rF-=12M (f6 fJ-4k_T;ZL3 a-T( .0 N. -remm -(STAFF-COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any% (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 13 of 26 'J� t t �� f' f c �• 2 s.=� t� f ✓r 6 r V f V 5 !1 r r 8. hand and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? _ VE�6 ! D W I-rf A•!_... a j w' �! OO (STAFF COMMENTS) ;- N tn w w xi J(—i _ to LL w b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. �d LL <' O S w. Z O Z w w d! (STAFF COMMENTS) • U O - _ r pHi ww; r�--; C. Describe any structures on the site. , z ui cni v =i o~ z (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ki (STAFF COMMENTS) w x e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? ">G4s ak.� CHKCT110-8-91.MASTER Page of 26 ,14 fhRiia }� a (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 140 Wo Iz KI (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 1S of 26 111111!:711 Ri W p� W LJ a, � _ z r� 0 w W! O O a U- O Zi U)i O ~' z to CHKLTJI O-S-SI.MASTER Page 16 of 26 (n rn W J E- tj) U. w0 La Da �w z �- ,� o LULU g� �a �Cn ph h` LL. C a Wu 0 F z :f < l f. •r r Ci: b. Approximately; how many units, if any would be eliminated? indicate whether}high, middle,-or.low-income housing. REES a+N -4 � 4t� ooc.E (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N o tii� (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(a) vrovosed? (STAFF COMMENTS) r � b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? (� (STAFF COMMENTS) z 4t i i i 1 oval C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: z a r W; (STAFF COMMENTS) J V' H O U) wi J ry 11. Light and Glare ! N U. wO a. what type of light or glare will the proposal produce? what time _J of day would it mainly occur? u, dI hloN� xw z r! z r w w: p (STAFF COMMENTS) V SU` r h. �- Z b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard interfere N� or with views? 0 r= Or Z { (STAFF COMMENTS) • y • C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? © ii (STAFF COMMEENTS) r* hi 1 i t Vp .a CHKLT114-8-Si.MASTER Page 18 of 26 �'€ _ w {. ak.•1�. _a . 1 Y _� Y11 7 k .. L Y "4 `• j it i 4 � 1 4•. � � Y �. ... _ ..,,.. v .. -.. ..ai+.nCt�YC44tih5uwiavw.,...... ..e_.. mw.er.rawiwa«.w+wwbt .,, Y,,,�,�,�„„-,,,, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 1yG9 fJE �{ d a Q, ASTAFF COMMENTS) w LU Xi CO O w 12. Recreation LL Q a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the cry immediate vicinity? �_-' t�1•�,��T Z�.� z zQ OJ U O — (STAFF COMMENTS) W W; = U, O(,' tl G ... - ... w �+ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? t= If so, describe. z No f (STAFF COMMENTS) { © C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 1rW �Xr`. .� } CHKLTt10.8-9LMASTER Page 19 of 26 ) DE 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? if so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. C ac- (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: is -0 R6 (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show an site plans, if any. Bq2,Qe. C-ur-m- ctj:r oR *5— Azle_ Aa--ags -ro Mkt -Z!f (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 20 of 26 tri LU! _J 1-0 U) LL LU 0 9 J U- < D UJ:' z 1--, 0: LU UJ! 0 U% 0 t= LU LU 0, Z Lli z to % n ;tit 5 j ? � 3.._. 5 Y ... .._e .5...f . .f:..lr'Y...SroiWea4m`...., ..___.... rw.e... .�...........A. IsSite Currently served rved by public transit? if no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest -transit stop? rk <1 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Now many parking spaces would the completed project have? now many would the project eliminate? NC-10 CARS 'Z CA5 (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If go, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 4T (STAFF COMMENTS) 0. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 0 T t 1 7 t t{ 1 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. sI N W' tC UOUI (STAFF COMMENTS) u] a' U) UWJ; -J h Ln ou- w g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: LL Q 1� ©Na sea fV = wi' Z_ F-! Z F- w Wi q (STAFF COMMENTS) U O t N' ; w Uj (�.. u. p, _ 15. Public Services Zi U N a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services OFZ- (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, Z schools, other)? If so, generally describe. _ 14 o t ax (STAFF COMMENTS) } b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: ; 1` oNr= t 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) t 'i ,tty I_ rZ (yi_ t R CNKl.T110-8-S1.MASTER Page 22 of 26 #° LU LU -j LL 0 LU; z 01; z r. W Lu,, Di L. LUI z LU Cn 0 z t 0 Proposed measures to protect or conserve Plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 24 of 26 :1 F-il protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, 0 threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, LU �d wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? � df Zh Zp w wi jProposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: a H w uy =V. u. p, ZE U =! O � Z S. Now would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses i incompatible with existing plans? i Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: t0 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? CHKLTl10-8-91.MASTER Page 25 of 26 i by S � �. 7 ...Md@nr 14 Y 0t1'C�+v'.s.kry..r'S�S (n W J it to O w J U. Ln Mw ZI-- �a WW 0 - aH = Cam, hF u- C C�r3 O� Z 3U M %I& .y y i. .5 t � 5 } Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: s' 7. °Ideutify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. i CHKIT/10-8-81.MAS7ER (n LL. 0 LU U. cn z I-- ;7- 0 Z �— LLI LU cr 0 Q UJ LL ul tj z to w 2 O U 0 0 (n LL W O; LL D{ N �I F=- W S Z I- 1- 0 Z 1— LULU U 0 n W W = t.) F- r- LL0 a Z W (p U = O W Z 0 to a December 5, 1996 File No. 21-96-031-001-0I i or OECD 6 Mot COM Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 -Subject: Soundview Plaza Traffic.Generation and Distribution Dear Mr. Lafon: 110.Vm ah3s Isntim"ItF, IVA 1'hnnv20t+;:;r ;'"' VAX 2w, 77;-343,P As requested by the City of Edmonds, we performed additional investigation of the anticipated traffic generation and distribution for Soundview Plaza, a mixed -use development in downtown Edmonds, Washington. The project is located at 116 Third Avenue North and is comprised of 3,400 square feet of retail space, 5,560 square feet of office space, and 4 residential condominium units. Our November 1, 1996 report provided traffic generation and distribution in terms of peak hour traffic as requested by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The City has now requested that we also provide traffic generation and distribution based on Average Daily Trip (ADT) volumes. The following table, based on the.1TE Trip Generation Manual, Stir Edition, presents the anticipated ADT generation for the project: ITE Land Trip Generation Total Land Jesse U e Code Rate ADT L. Condominiums 230 5.86/unit '23 Office 715 11.5/1000 sq.ft. 64 Retail 820 167.59/1000 sq.ft. 570 Total 657 There is an existing single family residence on the property which, according to the Trip Generation Manual, will generate 10 ADTs. Thus, the proposal will generate a net total of 647 new ADTs on the area street network. The attached map presents the anticipated distribution of the above traffic on the street network in the vicinity of the project. The City of Edmonds is collecting mitigation fees to address an upgrade of the intersection of Main Street and 9th Avenue. The City has suggested that an earlier mitigation offer of $4,040 to address the impact of 443 ADTs through the referenced intersection should be used as a basis for determining mitigation requirements for Soundview Plaza. As shown on the distribution map, we anticipate this project will put 120 ADTs through the subject intersection, which is 27 percent of { NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS ® __THIS NOTICE IT 1 DUE TO THE QUALITY OF You have also required the Owners to pay for re -issuance of the ADB hearing notice if the meeting is canceled for reasons of weather, power failure, etc. or other reasonable emergencies. We agree to do this. Sincere , Warren LaFon cc: Markezinis SITE SECTIONS ■t® PLAN its fill �kj + NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS THIS NOTICEIT_1S DUE TO THE QUALITY OF AkU NVId WO-W 181 a sayo v ilynt! r. Asocn a *out 90 sm z 5 CARSWAWM OFnCE 3Ro FLOOR PLAN f 7'L4`l a ��y l�'•. 0 z ■to 0 P � � '�,i1�//,L"r l/` �lf� ra'1����, irf� x�✓ 'ri,+f" � •//�f�11t' I1.,;, t,;fd �f�a u TO Yt4' IS 25XIU �lo�T , i a t; s r<Ll : l CAR I �a 5 CARS ONCE E E �.d 3 CARS I I j i 4 CARS 4 CARS amerce . ! j 4 ( 4 I 2NU FLOOR PLAN »r. eai O, i --------- ........ 11M HIM= 3RD FLOOR PLAN Ae - d x to N e X M Z S H rt s t - r WEST ELEVATION vww EAST ELEVATION ur4. PC, 40 SFp 4 P INS", �T low W�W M W-� NORTH ELEVATION 111W SOUTH ELEVATION 0 MA PLATIS LAW FMM Attorneys at Law arry B. platis. P.S. 1206) 776.3888 U1 D. Ryals 4303 - 198th Street S.W. EMAIL: hplatjt@wsftied".com ants C. Waft Lynnwood, Washington 98036-8725 Fax: 1208) 778-4916 January 14,19971 Mr. John Bissell City of Edmonds i onamunity Services Department 250 Sth Avenue IS orth Edmonds, WA 98D20 Re: File MDD-96�. I 13/Markezinis Project I Dew Mr. Bisselh As we discussed Platis Law Firm represents Bob Gorman, owner and operator of Cbre's Pantry, my understanding that W Nfarkezinis has sought Board approval of construction of a ;w 30,000 square foot mixed use building with commercial/office space' I and four (4) resid4utial dwelling units. Please be advised that for reasons sot forth below, W. Gorman stron* opposes Board approval of Mr. MarkezW projecL For over ten (10) years, WMarkezinis has leased a I lYxl W place of realty to my client for the purpose ofproviding an area to house two (2) dumpsters. Pursuant to the several oral ground leases that have been entered into over the years, W Gorman has paid Nft- Markezirtis, $1020: 00 annually for the use of this demised area. Mr. Gorman has jusdftbly relied on W Mar cezirds' course of conduct that the 1 O'x 10'plece of property would be available. The Board must be mindful ofthe disastrous ramflicarlons that will result if W. Gomm is not afforded the ri$M to lease the area of land that has been provided to him for the pm i decade. The Health Department will no doubt require Mr. Gorman to cease finther operations until perty is found to house the waste that CWs Pantry generates. Incidentally, Clarets Pantry exceeded 1.3 million in sales for1996. eO*d TeZOTLL6 01 WNIJ MUI SlItIld 1408:1 EO:LT L66T-VT-NUf 75, 0 0 . t-rd i:i min s i itnci wu:i IFROM: P* PATE: HARD COPY:WILL MESSAGES/NOT4S: TOTAL PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET -3: WI T FOLLOW BY MAIL OR COURIER LEASE CALL AT (206) 776-3888 IF THERE ARE ANY ROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSMISSION OF THIS DOCUMENT. TO'cl IZZOUL6 ol W81=1 MU"I S11818 W08:1 20:LT LGST—K—Wr N � cn W J OI w} J LL T G7 = u, Z H t- O w w. U qj' O Z Yin 0 Z L® ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD STAFF REPORT January 13, 1997 ADB-96-113 REQUEST FOR FINAL. APPROVAL OF A NEW 12 UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEX A. Applicant/ProgeM Owner Architect Jim & Carrie Markezinis Warren LaFon 18826 Freemont Ave N 123 4th Ave N Shoreline, WA 98133 Edmonds, WA 98020 B. Site Location: 110 3rd Avenue North C. Introduction: The applicant has proposed a new mixed use building on two lots. The north lot is currently developed with a single family residence, while the southern lot is currently vacant. The proposed building would have a total interior space of approximately 30,000 square feet with approximately 10,000 square feet each for parking, office and four dwelling units. D. Background: 1. Description of Property: The subject property is comprised of two lots which are each 60 feet by 120 feet. Thus the building site is a 1 :10 feet by 120 feet square. The applicant should be aware that the two lots must be legally combined though lot line adjustment or covenant prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. Zoning: The property is zoned Community Business (BC), which allows mixed use commercial building with the primary use being commercial and the secondary use being residential with one dwelling unit for every 3,000 square feet of lot area. This zone district allows zero foot setbacks with a maximum allowable height of 25 feet plus 5 feet for roofs with a 4:12 pitch. 3. Environmental Review: The subject proposal is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). In this case the Applicant has submitted an environmental checklist and the City has issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS). The mitigation's required for this development through SEPA are to offset traffic impacts. 4. Issues: Design of the building, site, and landscaping have all been addressed by the applicant in their proposal, and the Architectural Design Board must determine the appropriateness of the proposal. E. Staff Analysis: 1. Building Design: The applicant has proposed a brick building with three stories visible to the west side (street side) and two stories visible from the east side (alley side). Portions of the 2nd floor (alley level) parking on the north, south and east sides will be open. The applicant has proposed parking and commercial on the street level, with the commercial space fronting on the street, and the parking behind. The alley level (2nd floor) will also have parking and commercial, with the commercial fronting on the street side and the parking accessing the alley side. The bulk of the roof is flat with portions proposed with 4:12 pitch to give relief and added light to the dwelling units. The applicant has also proposed an alternative to the 4:12 pitch portions. This alternative uses a barrel roll or arched type roof. The proposed alternative would require either a code amendment or a variance to be approved. LEIB The proposed building has considerable modulation and visual interest. This is accomplished through a variety of shapes including arched first floor windows, square second floor windows and peaked windows on the roof hne. The north, west, and south elevations also include decks with metal railings on the third floor and wall openings with pipe rail on the second floor. The east elevation shows the least modulation and visual interest using only a flat roof, square windows and wall openings for the parking area. It should also be noted that the barrel roll roof option also shows arched widows on the second floor which would tie the roof line through the second floor to the arches located on the first floor. a) MatgdWL In the proposal before the Board, the applicant has chosen to use brick as the siding material. b) Lighting: No site lighting is proposed for this application c) Colors: A mixture of different colored red brick is proposed The applicant has proposed black aluminum window frames and black pipe railings. d) Signing: No signing is proposed. 2. Site Design: a) Access / Parking: The applicant is proposing pedestrian access directly off 3rd Avenue North. The parking access will be divided with half the parking located on the first floor, accessing from the north part of the west (street) elevation. The other half of the parking will be located on the second floor with access provided from the alley. b) Landscaping: Since the applicant is proposing a building in a zone which allows and encourages zero setback development, the proposed building nearly completely fills the subject lot. Therefore, the applicant has proposed no landscaping with this project. c) Trash Enclosure: The applicant has provided a trash enclosure located in the building off the alley. The size of the enclosure shown on the plans is not adequate. However, the applicant has presented a plan to the Public Works Division which is adequate. The new plan does not change the configuration of the building. 3. Technical Review: a) Engineering Division: • On street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. • The project will require that a site plan prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer be approved by the City Engineer. • The project will have to comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. • Provision for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. (Information only). • Existing paving in alley is to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Repaving may be required. • Existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Third Ave. N. are to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Removal and replacement may be required. ra A 1 { S fah S S i eY..y 1 r J 1,4 -40 i 1 � C 4 S y F `t •`� ADS-96413 '"� • , Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. • ` The cross sections provided for the site are inadequate for Engineering to use for a final Z1 submittal. • Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas to the on -site parking. w `` cc m • Civil Engineered drawings must match the architectural drawings. m Ui b) Building Division C.) p; CO I • Compliance with the ADA requirements must be met. W • Two handicapped accessible stalls will be required. Ex' • All dwelling units are required to be type B units. m 11. a Civil Engineered drawings must match the architectural drawings. F. Summary: The applicant has proposed two design alternatives with this application; one with LL Q peaked roof portions and one with arched roof lines. Both design alternatives appear to be in compliance m M with the City of Edmonds Design Guide. If the Board chooses to approve both options or the arched roof W i alone the Board must also state in the motion that the applicant must either obtain a variance or a code Z� amendment prior to the approval of a building permit for the arched roof option. Z OO W W; Attachments: i Gt V I. Vicinity Map O H r t� ; 2. Applicant's declarations, elevations and site plan ' S 'c�j LL Z ui u3' ca = o~ 1 'y 3 r - . ',;_; r � 1! 3 r�a;'r uoAlua�l�a�l��lp �I�, (iii�111��1116�III�IIINI���, 1°��N���) If 11C , l hII I: 11. No- �Inau �I�n��lua71 _i s i� w. wo Notice of Development Application & Public Hearing of Date of Notice: December 31, 1996 - .t sw File #ADB 96 113 x z r vr, v r'' ' ri9'a : N,�,n.-�'a� �`�`-"t k. p 4rrnattottj s�°—' x '. "3 J ?. ''' Permit�fomtton .YF'.b.4 ...m ,�ttFnL�f.. um) Name of Applicant ... 9 Jim& Carrie Markeziins Requested Permits * Approval by the Architectural - wm �. Date of Application:........... * September 4,1996,1996 and Approvals............... Design Board j z Date Application complete: 9 December 10, 1996 Other Required Permits O Building ,a not yet applied for (if p F z Project Location:- a 110 3rd Avenue North known):........................... Ad Project Description:........... * Construction of a new 30,000 square foot Required Studies related Z Traffic trip generation study j mixed use building with commerolayoffiee to the project: .................. - space and 4 residential dwelling units. !;l Public Comments due by:.. January 15, 1997 Related Environmental : 9 Critical Areas Checklist City Contact for project:.... John Bissell Documents: 1 . ys..,..- Date. January 15, 1997 Time: 7 00 P.M. Place: Comm. Svcs. Cord. Room - 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Community Services Departmen4 t © 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 (206) 771 0220 Public comments should also be sent to this address The removal, mutlladon, destmction, or concealment of this This notice may be removed Warning! notice before the hearing date is a misdemeanor punishable by after: January 15, 1997 fine and Imprisonment. O__..... 32x'❑ 25x' .. T1rPE ON THIS SIDE WITHIN DAX�. _ _.._. y 8308 000 205 00 4344 006 012 01 4344 006 003 00 THI D A6EW-t ' Z LTD. SUZIE REYNOLDS ERLENE BENISH 202 000 S 212 Capers St. 117 4th Ave. N Sea , '..98101 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 006 001 01 & 00 4344 006 004 00 8308 000 201"00 %CQ WELLPARTNERSHIP LAURIE LUOMA 123 4th Ave. N. 120 3rd Ave. S #201 , A 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 8308 000 202 00 4344 016 005 Al 4344 006 "005 OQ HELEN JESSEN DENA BLATT GREG WILSON 120 3rd Ave. S #202 316 Main St. 133 4th Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 `8308 000 203 04 ' 4548 001 013 00 4344 007 008 QO { Paul Simonton M -VEL PORTERFIELD LIMITED 120 3rd Ave. S #203 P. 201 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Ed s, 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 8308 000 204 00 KENNETH MORGAN .ROY 120 3rd Ave. S #204 FREDERICKSON 4344 006 008 00 Edmonds, WA 98020 P.O. Box 488 MARGARET MILLER 8308 000 204 00 Edmonds, WA 98020 124 3rd Ave. N. 4548 001 012 00 Edmonds, -WA 98020 4344 016 005 01 ANN TURNER P.O. Box 458 Edmonds, WA 98020 a It 4344 016 005 02 Her T K eSE Is and, WA98040 A 4344 006 012 02 CLAIRES LTD. 301 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 4548 001 011 00 LORETTA SORENSON 220 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 007 001 00 METROPOLITAN FEDERAL 229 Main St. Edmonds, WA. 98020 4344 007 004 02 MURPHY, HOPPER PARTNERS 430 Bell St 31000 Edmonds, WA 98020 c® 4344 016 003 00 4548 001 003 00 CORP. REAL ESTATE NW THOMAS TINDALL 306 Main St 126 3rd Ave. S] Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 .Jim & Carrie Markezinis .RICHARD7EADIE00 18826 Fremont Ave. N. P.O. Box 187 Shoreline, WA 98133 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 007 005 00 ROBERT ULLMAN 131 3rd Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 4548 0.01 009 01 CONNEL SOUTH 102 3rd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA 98020 4548 001 009 02 CHARLES SHEPHERD P.O. Box 416 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 016 011 00 FRONTIER BANK P.O. Box 2115, Everett, WA 98201 Warren LaFon 99223 4tth Av . N Edmonds, W 91020 r I -RECEIVED s JAN - 7 1997 Affidavit of Publication EDMONDS CITY CLERK STATE OF WASHINGTON. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, - - The undersigned; being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of • Everett, County of Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of , general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior " Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ........................................ Public Hearing & Development.Application 3 Jim & Carrie.Markezinis :+ .................... ......... ...... File No.: ADB-96-113 ........................................................... ...... ..... .... .......... .. a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: December 31, 1996 ............................................................................ .............................................. Ad at said newspaper w s r rly distributed to its subscribers all of a, ,p}er�iod Principal Clerk ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this.: 31st......... , �.y... December 96 ....................... ................ Notary Public in and for t e St a of Washington, residing at Everett, Snoh ounty. -t. %a . TLLSCOP/BR C4Vi3R PASir/3 Z - r �, 1-0: �, rg !2 E' bra �/?r�:-e iJE'S l7ATETRANtSMtiTEO / 'gyp -fso i>: ,'� NUMSEFt OF PAGES:_. - . LLA �I (tncluc/ing cover Page).. u O; Recipients Talacapiar Number. to — . FAc lmlt..E Et]u/PM6N-c: i/) LUI AutdmaticlQroup It Ltt �; - C2,a menrs.)) Group tli (1) U. FROM: 1 S S-e- l l R there are prdbtems O dorc�uments a�r�e recalvcd ua ------ ---- lrK=T lads. f�tnaaa Call - 220S) �7�-Q22t] and asK 7 f 4ti ty d Sender•sTetecapiar Numbor: (206) 771-0221 (A a RE• i r = _ z_ r; z 2 a• ca - o `U LU r r • 2naarporatod Amoust 22. 2690 • LL zi - Stater =[dew lntannattonnl — lkiakinan. Japan . uj U 3: or z TRANSMISSION REPORT i c THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) s WAS SENT i ** COUNT �k © # S t® *** SEND ***. TATION 393049 a COMMENT L D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES 12-20-96 2:35AM 1'32" 3 ml REMOTE S 12063 TOTAL 0:01*32" 3 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 711 Name of Applicant: Jim & Carrie Markezinis File No.: ADB-96-113 ' Project Location: 110 3rd Avenue North Project Description: Application by Jim & Carrie Markezinis to construction a new 30,000 square foot mixed use building with 51% of the building use for office and retail, and 49% for 4 residential ` dwelling units, along with 3,250 cubic yards of associated grading, and 35 parking stalls. City Contact. John Bissell Public Comment Period Due By: 1/15/96 i PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Time: 7.00 P.M. Date: January 15,1997 Location: Community Services Conference Room - 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds t Sandy Chase, City Clerk Publish: No later than December 31,1997 i to These items are transmitted for -rL 7ALKm---) Lu (-r4 -s7wc- fG -r4t75C— -rALK5. 6i LU UJ —J Cl) 0 -J tL M UJ z I-- 0 �i �— W LU U (n 0- 0 W LIJ LU y OF z to WARREn W 1POn ARCHITECT atehlisslors planning latedom 23 4th North Kdatonds, We 96020 7744560 r. 14 Dec. 10, 1996 W. John Bissell Planning Dept. City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: MARKEZINIS BLDG. - SOUNDVIEW PLAZA Dear John, el The traffic study required by the City of Edmonds also requires a mitigation fee of $1094.00. This fee shall be paid, by the Owner, just prior to the issuance of the building permit. You have also required the Owners to pay for re -issuance of the ADB hearing notice if the meeting is canceled for reasons of weather, power failure, etc. or other reasonable emergencies. We agree to do this, Sincere Warren LaFon cc: Markezinis f �. . _ ..,.c1..«rG,nlwow-.y.�.,�:..,�n�m.•crm»actireimmu w.,�wim�vswr+scszhmcAe.suarraanamz�+ttrou�urtrteta�s,�casu5,ea.-,,.;weer''.'....,..,...o�+.:kar�o�..�..... �. "..,_.»._.._...:`...::..__ MEMORANDUM December 6,1996 i TO: John Bissel, Associate Planner CC CC FROM: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator(, oR SUBJECT: DB-96-113t cn w 1 I have reviewed the revised traffic study prepared for the subject property. It appears to �LU � be in order, and the engineer proposes that the owner offer to pay $1094 in mitigation LL fees. These fees are typically paid as part of the building permit. As indicated earlier, = d you may wish to send a copy of the revised report to Ed Giraud in the Developer 'a _: Services section of WSDOT. 1 have no other comment on the report. z t-; a w wi, c.� =u; a z w 0, Z- ... - j t � 3 W MARK1.DOC c {� t® MIG+I1�GV December 5, 1996 File No. 21-96-03 1 -00 1 -01 Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects 123 Fourth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 VOW Subject: Soundview Plaza Traffic•Generation and Distribution Dear Mr. Lafon: Phone PAX 2tx, 7; :.a1v As requested by the City of Edmonds, we performed additional investigation of the anticipated traffic generation and distribution for Soundview Plaza, a mixed -use development in downtown Edmonds, Washington. The project is located at 116 Third Avenue North and is comprised of 3,400 square feet of retail space, 5,560 square feet of office space, and 4 residential condominium units. Our November 1, 1996 report provided traffic generation and distribution in terms of peak hour traffic as requested by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The City has now requested that we also provide traffic generation and distribution based on Averagc Daily Trip (ADT) volumes. The following table, based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, presents the anticipated ADT generation for the project: TTE Land Trip Generation Total Und Us se Dole Rate ADT U Condominiums 230 5.86/unit 23 Office 715 11.5/1000 sq.ft. 64 Retail 820 167.59/1000 sq.ft. S70 Total 657 There is an existing single family residence on the property which, according to the Trip Generation Manual, will generate 10 ADTs. Thus, the proposal will generate a net total of 647 new ADTs on the area street network. The attached map presents the anticipated distribution of the above traffic on the street network in the vicinity of the project. The City of Edmonds is collecting mitigation fees to address an upgrade of the intersection of Main Street and 9th Avenue. The City has suggested that an earlier mitigation offer of $4,040 to address the impact of 443 ADTs through the referenced intersection should be used as a basis for determining mitigation requirements for Soundview Plaza. As shown on the distribution map, we anticipate this project will put 120 ADTs through the subject intersection, which is 27 percent of M 1 (`4 L i Mr. Warren Lafon Warren Lafon Architects December 5,1996 File No. 21-96-031 -001 -01 Page 2 I the ADTs of the earlier mitigation offer. Thus, 27 percent of $040 equals $1,094. The sponsor �- UY of the Soundview Plaza project should draft a letter to the City of Edmonds offering to pay �? $1,094 in mitigation fees for impacts to the intersection of Main Street and 9th Avenue, Q referencing this letter as the basis for the amount C/)� LU�+ I hope you find the above information helpful. Please contact me if you have any questions. (no Thank you for allowing REID MIDDLETON to be of service. LU Sincerely, .. CC J , co �� REID MIDDLETON, INC. Uit Z o WendellA. Johnson, "C , PLS w w, Project Manager � o ca vlf\gep\smallpro\sondvie2.doc t a r Attachment w w: LL o' _ Zi t) N O~ Z S ; y L® } v � A. •,•.{ � •.. = . �.' . ;::`'�'. _ i< ,h. 5 �'^, f� � lid,` z (J) — Ui LW (n LL 0 LU LL UJ' z OL LU LU 0- 0 �- LU twJ LL 0 z LU rp z The attached map presents the anticipated distribution of the above traffic on the street network in the vicinity of the project. Our experience has been that many jurisdictions consider less Ehan ten trips through an intersection to be of negligible impaCt. I hope you find the above information helpful. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for allowing REID MIDDLETON to be of service, Sincerely, 0 REID MIDDLETON, INC. CP, L Wendell A. Johnson, S Project Manager 0 ylAgep\smallprd\sondv1ew.doc Attachment 0' -W 11/01/96 16:06 rAX 206 775 3439 RHI 1) 111 DDISTON 0:1 0 i *' NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN ® Q THIS NOTICE IT I DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. •:>j+. .1:' �!'.i.•. i.•�:tt...,:1 •.•'•.. ..� 1 Y J il'T:�vi( ~�1.. `:; _ fY=f .. ci: r7 s:�is. !: .•3r*'•R .r y-.%'st;':••r..:::i Lr�E•.`.; fir:.,,=,..; �• :.+� ':t: ,:s•• ii•. try {. • .l,t'•t . 'Sr +S,...c 5:1.= r i fir.. r v r •: r,1 r.t �. ,r'f"ri•.Ny •�Yv.::::• i � 7i^r. it• ,.{+• rvq. r {'et'J �::,.FyiS..Nr. =j:''.�.J� •Y. �.ly � ' iµ*��• s.t `'•4:tli:^ , :t � �f;e:. jj: r 7rS ..rtr`ritl?� •�L�:.J .;v :d;.;,,fe S.f:3.'...;a .a;. 'trt�:}�:t,�d,R.►:.},:i:� e:u�•1f:fa;'•A.i"r':i%"%%Ft�,�ti�,:;.;,'s`'.4 :.�,r�,:��isn,5�`' f.�3'ir'`. a•:::�.:>.�• 0 14.• R ,i :f; •s fy LT�e.i=:.t .t '}%Y -+C�f"t •`, .'. .r'w "t',w rhv 3 "yS.li .A �, :y' zYR.•j n•r�fa"g'.,�.». `.*z \ cx •=���.1 ':7•.+l i{f�v.':r' :'•3•":.� ff �`Ix:.i: tt,,.�s:r. � :�i�)^,L:�i� Sac., F;;.. !.y,'.y�.J.R.V%v,�:..r _^f'Za. � :i•+. �i>. •f,,,- �,.•• )�� s�:,}. �lr :••: v"r�t`:.?: tl �.} _ :.444Z.! ! -,;qjr ....t 1��:.:.4�•.Jr«`yl:'4:'4^i. xy'1��•i�Kl '1;;4�"'�i• :tS. Ci`_.u�.:!1'"tt l.•��'i�::. ,. ::',i:.•:r: f.'„w •„' 07 Y�tg�' f• �'.}�' •�¢;i�'::t?�'t$4t'S'�4::,7?v:L =_ ,,.-; +s.r ate. S��=•rr'��1' a}"A!�` tlzt�{s�•'+4.,.:LcN!%y,.j,'�t�. .{" '• „ , :' ¢,�, ht{.'��tl-�..i�RJ ;,(+t'vj' ltif:H'• :lrn;ti:f`r:,y.1,.T y"''F3ki''+7yy i;;ri'%_'44:•ry,. _� �. 4. .1i •.• •',i�.':� •' a m.� f ,;l�4'.;15� �'i' : �:: al.•c„;� t:�1 k.T., `t• � 7 k,t;._;: --._,_, ;S .L e =:{r i .;.s: y±;;;r,,:x=?yr:.tt��,rL7i1 t r :,„�,.. ':.:fd._•:•`s. `:y,.: C Fr,,.: ii; �, rM r •f i' �' r`�''".v3ti''r^''t!�.`d' ,� •+• • .rt , 7a�1,:•?�•:':_`+'7t,? r? J `+ it' • ,g(.t:: .R,' "•i.c �..?. "t r:<: .°f _ ;;:rn,.�„ pr1' •�y:» .4nlxl jh. %fir: _^3u= •'.r;:. c.. ^` Y• i�`•12,�,Zt \ tu• K s i l`.f rr. •JS ••t+^ Yr: �:.: • :.;Jf sYy'T 27i Stw•,R..t••"; ay_(+:: `S hj`-' tR ?•�if lt•.�. '�i `kte _ :�'�Z Y�;w• St 44i�y sy}.yl,..1��"y4.r.3.."'f;'5.•�. 3"::?�y'y.J,'S:y�'"'.'.,.7,•�`,,�c::+i-7= �:^''�.?=.j �:i�.• .,i rG `5�r,.' _ A 11 `x7 +�'+'.+rP'+4�'�>r�;�4•{ T�tr2tl�s �t ,�y..%- airy':: f,', 'her t� �'�,-. ' {� v'• ,}^ �ij'=µ•v�ilf.& S � fti, y.r k� 7 Jf �ti:•„a•.,• p • i •': ;t{r• t-� ..�: ., 5,./i t3)y. «fyyie;j rvv .:+,:c•>r+•.j'fS.Y a r�'-�'�.n� f t-5 i �+r•' � � _ ?r• .���. �;i,;z .r.: .f.=. 4+1i �'•.7t = S•E7 :i=•,i: !?. �^of� p �. �r4� '�'.t :µ ,`�F a :'C: i.S: � . f ..': .:: r4,. i i?;!1....a..'i;...: •}.�Y:'''.. et,":�y,: y 4; S t •J ..j •`• `.r,`•.YY »-r,., .•r,'y"^.if' i:rW 'S.\Ylv ,..}.i•4 oM�� b i. ; =J � v �•S. ' i x� � <tri y=� y` T' J; r„L! y� r5-MJ:"trs', f7 .{y.c;'� ?,':.. S ,�. .:-,-^• "_""`---"` � ;5`•"' F71,i: `'i'�`{t'i' ';Y�.�S'' _ w}��-.� ���,3��i •cRi',�e�•` ti _ �.. ..yr;= •_� .r, '�. f.{,ti�'.. A �,/� '%yt .0 Vu�� +i' •":Ti:' � y. " ;1u . _�..• rA' Y _. � ay ,G^ i� rxn�•r •s' .xis,.%',' � �' f r '-J���'A.r�! ' bi'ii.t�•! V 3�t,'p' ��` /t�17 `s Pxf t 4v'fi url xirf'+ � ' t:u•e•. `itrt t5.r� :n+ . ` • �� ��' •t�:� jute'; t; ,��,,.5-r� rr ~ �t :•v�,���i rri+'�w;r•:.r� a a .. H.it. a.... r{sC ... `{t(txl=r8 z.-.i• P,,+ (2^l�l {. �Y' JJ-- c1"' ""'�'Gw4'kf ��"+•vMrs'.'i�.' a r{ia. tr-i i Q� /•,. t� 'v''y /;,�i� J�r� tt�'+ 51f� r t `�'-e '� �� ••tom'. � +(�'��C �/''y � M1 a-.3:IF., � Fn it j� i y'•:` " "9 C "F _ 6,_ _ l(D f y .: Ol to Lis NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS THI$ NOTICE IT I ._DUETO THE QUALITY OF THE f C13 W Nor :,,., Vali+ ,j tiT . �r �t [� i-taidaq"3s'iY� JE'�� t� TRAFFIC Id9PACT ANALYSIS CHECKLIST WSDOT NORTHWEST REGION Contact' Developer Services 440-00 �ottYo pesto�ttift:AtL SLFAtFvts sllrtua 2yTttta ciir•.eitus�' \Il'sT DE t';c:.4'n6o tvl'ouxtanrFte tsnnCT,I�ALI'ata, tc a.� tttattw�"t is !1{Sal--mritt,NALYIiSWitLN0T2ERMrxyF.nnlrr%yit.i, itsaR9tta\'LnU'm1ouTR4VACn0N. I. r�i'ttgt Ucscrintioa: ' Location (vicinity map and site plan). Horizon Year (year of completion & full occupancy), ,-_ Type. Site, and Location (hi hwayytmilepost) ofDevelopment, 'Type ofAcccsa (Direct, Riga-itt fight -out Only). R. Trig Qene;pljU (ITE Trip Generation Manual, Sth Edit.) AW DT, Ahi, Pi4I Peak Hour Trips (Noott if applicable). ill. ri Dislri i _.._. Show distribution percentages on vicinity map/diagram. Show lefts, rights and throughs• IV. Ieflic V,ctutilS3: Existing AM nod Pih•I peak hour counts & date (-Q4Fyr3. old). Future AWDT, AM, PIaI peak hour trips withAvithout project. The annual growth rate factor (%) and its source. �_.. Include the trips front all pipeline developments (of the lame or earlier horizon year.) V. Level ofService(i;,91LCal gata r�4=e At all State highway IlS's impacted by ) U bi' Mora Peak hour trips from the dc$ctopmcnt. _ Signallzed ItS-(Based on the overall US LOS). Unsignalized US (Based on US LOS). _ LOS calculation sheets must be included. ALL assumptlons Should be noted for volume reductions, saturation flow rates, splits, etc, and their basis. VI. c td t ngfysjg; • ' At all proposed direct access points to State Highway. _ At all S's where developer miti ation is proposed. At High Accident Locations (OL). An accident analysis shall consist at: a llati of the I/S's 3 year accident hlsto . a cofliion di ram illustrating the above`6per attached pideline). a discussion of both of the Rbove, including the predominant accident types and their locations, any accident patterns, an assessment of the development's traffic safety impact, and mitigation for its safety impact. Pose I br2 rnLL w0 LL._ To SUJ F— S Z E— ;--O Z ua w �O V- n�- LU Lc v 3 8 1- Z i } f v September 27,1996 MEMO TO: John Bissell FROM: Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator SA SUBJECT: Recommendations on recent CDRC items New Retail/Office/Condominium (Soundview Plaza),116 3rd Avenue N. Discussion with Sound Disposal, who would provide garbage and recycling service to this building, led to acceptance of the general site for refuse containers along the alley on the east side and the access using a 7 to 8 foot wide overhead door. However the actual space proposed for the containers is insufficient. The area itself needs to be wider to permit easy movement of the containers when servicing. This is critical especially when recycling containers are present because they require a separate service vehicle for collection and moving one or more containers to get to the one needing service is inefficient and therefore adds to costs. Per Edmonds City ordinance, space for refuse containers needs to allow inclusion of appropriate recycling containers. The solution that presents itself on the proposed plan is to expand the container site to the south, claiming the adjacent full parking space, and enclose accordingly. There is an indication that there are extra parking spaces on the plan. As per Fire Code, this area would need to have sprinklers. An expanded container area would not only facilitate servicing, but would most likely handle any configuration of containers needed. At full occupancy, each retail and office tenant may want their own containers, plus those designated for the condo residents. ,a z ¢�. tz' W a� W� -j0 LO LOW LU _I { - CO o LU cc cc J Di sW _z t=— , O LULU �o o F- LU w T U. t- F- u- O z ui to U y O ~' z V, i 0 L APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE:,. ADB-96-11 ' t AND CHECKLIBT FROM: PLANNING Asn P%0 } 0' ROUTED TO: RETURNED "�C%117pl Engineering Engineering Fire , Fire Public Works / Public Works �r r Parks 8t ReC / ParkRec. 3.�.. �s_.. Staff Comments s ex �t9, ISS t/ ,ate *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner. ]IM_ex CARR€E MARKEZINIS _• Property Address 110 THIRD AVENUE NORTH • Date of Application 9/4/96 • Type CONSTRUCT OFFICE / CONDO BUILDING •• Hearing Required:YesX_ No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application X Fee X APO List Title Report X vicinity Map X Elevations Petition (Official Street Map) 96-169 Critical Areas Determination Site Plan for Short Subdivision (6.5 x 11) Z Z' LU cc LLI U 0 U) 0 (n LU LLI X LU cc cc LL < z 1.— 0 LULU LU L) 0 LIJ Lui 0 z L Li U) 0 z 0 0 PPLICATION ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST FILE: ADB-96-113 FROM: PLANNING RETURNED 119,96, Wneerip..'.� Engineerin R E C E I VED Fire. CA P Parks blic Works---V91-26 ex Rec. 9/9196 Public Wo& Parks at Rec. V PnMDS FIRZ M21. Staff Comments: &oe6o,,,c-> A,) Tt�vx -7 %a a 41; *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODED *1' OMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Ariditional 7 Information Required for Complete Application *AIdditional 7 Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner JIM 8X CARRIE MARKEZINIS Property Address_110 THIRD AVENUE NORTH Date of Application— 9/4/96 Type CONSTRUCT OFFICE /CONDO BUILDING e Hearing RequiredlNes X No Date of Hearing (If known) Application —Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Fee X Site Plan 01 x 17) X APO List X_Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report _Environmental Assessment X Vicinity Map -----Yroof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) X Elevations Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) Petition (Official Street Map) ——X Environmental Checklist 96-169 Critical Areas Determination 0 10 0 r 0 APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE: ADS-WI13 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING ROUTED TO: SEpRETURNED Engineering 9/9/96,11WC wolky's DEPI Engineering Fire 919196 Fire Public Works, Parks 81 Rec. 9/9/96 Parks ex Rec Staff Comments: SAEP 1 . f 0EPr *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODEZ *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review 9 Owner Property Address_ 110 THIRD AVENUE NORTH Date of Application 914196 Type CONSTRUCT OFFICE I CONDO BUILDING Hearing Requlred:Yes__X_ No Date of Hearing (if known) X —Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X —Fee X Site Plan (I I x 17) X —APO List X Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report _Environmental Assessment X —vicinity Map —Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) X —Elevations Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) Petition (Official Street Map) X Environmental Checklist 96-169 Critical Areas Determination 0 10 z �U cc W = J C) Uo to O (nLU LU h. Cn LL -O LU }i ¢ J LL CC �t z d. �w zF- 1_Q WW �a �Q w w! = U Hp W_ 0 Z W Cl) 0~ Z 0 ma C 1 TV APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE: ADB-96-113 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING 'TO: Engineering 9/9196 Fire 9/9/96 Public Works 919/96 Parks ex Rec.9/9/96 RETURNED Engineering Fire Public Works Parks ex Rec. *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED "`Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner • PropertyAddress— 110 THIRD AVENUE NORTH Date of Application 9/4/96 Type CONSTRUCT OFFICE / CONDO BUILDING Hearing Required:YesX_ No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application X Fee X APO List Title Report X Vicinity Map X Elevations Petition (Official Street Map) 96-169 Critical Areas Determination Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Site Plan (11 x 17) X Legals (Existing & Proposed) Environmental Assessment Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) X 1=nv4rnnmonfn1 Pha Wie1 G7 z F- 00 U) a Lt) LU W _J 0) U_ LU 0, 2�j g LL T(5! 3: Uj, I- :C z h- �_ 0 Z �-' LU LU cn; 0 CI T d" r F_ LL 0 z LU U) L) ZF 0 z t 0 W MMEMORANDUM Date: September 11, 1996 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator Subject: (ADB-96-113) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Engineering Division has the following comments on the proposal: 1. On street parking revisions and signage will need to be shown. 2. The project will require that a site plan prepared and stamped by a Professional Engineer be approved by the City Engineer. 3. The project will have to comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. 4. Provision for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. (information only). 5. Existing paving in alley is to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Repaving may be required. 6. Existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Third Ave. N. are to be inspected by the City Engineering staff. Removal and replacement may be required. 7. Twenty-four foot wide curb cut and alley access width will be required to provide access to the parking. Twenty-four foot wide clear drive aisle will be required to the underground parking. 8. The cross sections provided for the site are inadequate for the Engineering to use for a final submittal. 9. Signs will be required to direct customers of office and retail areas directing them to the on -site parking. The application is considered complete at this time. Cffy OF EDMONDS ADB96113.DOC ENGU40MMGDIVISION il 0 "V W� J U U O U)LU J F- U)LL W� Q J t�L LnO =w z t_ ra LUW �o �Cn, o 1-- WW �F �a _z LU Cr U = O~ z to C APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE ADB-96-113 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING ROUTED TO: RETURNED Engineering __ 9I9I96 Engineering Fire 9/9/96 Fire PubIIC Wortcs 9/9146 Public Works Parks & Rec.�9/9196 Parks ex Rec. Staff Comments: *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review Owner JIM a -CARRIE MARKEZINIS Property Address1 1 O THIRD AVFNHr NORTH e Date of Application 9/4/96 s Type FFICE /CONDO Bull niN . Hearing Required:Yes_X _-__ No Date of Hearing (if known) X Application X Fee X APO List Title Report X Vicinity Map X Elevations Petition (Official Street Map) 96-169 Critical Areas Determination Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) -.K.-Site Plan (11 x 17) X Legais (Existing & Proposed) Environmental Assessment Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) - Declarations (Variance & C. U. P.) ---A_Environmental Checklist M ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ❑ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE #�" 3 ❑ HOME OCCUPATION ZONE ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION DATE yy� REC'D BY ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 17 RECEIPT# j %�% ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HEARING DATE ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT / STREET VACATION ❑ HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB 50-ADB ❑ CC ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ACTION TAKEN: ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED ❑ OTHER -C?6- loi- APPEAL# Applicant ' J/M 4 ORR16 z/1415 Phone 544g0 - yStS 3 Address =Z�2 "aP15Mtc6a 4ole. A] �54carzLgLI&I* 1 diA `N133 Property Address or Location 110 3" AV E . 14. Property Owner .JAfre Phone 4Wa Address " // Agent L&5a Y4"—"- - Y Z3R2r Phone =4L- C 590 Address__/2� ��x i4t1 l�. >rf�alt�c Tax Acc # - C 04, _ QIQ - 066'Z- Sec. Twp. Rng. Legal Description s ra PZAa Details of Project or Proposed Use C2Wt57k'tA=Z L ? The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting a ndant to this co bn. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT In I Lu LL D T) LU; z 1, ;7- z of Lm Wl phi 1=i LU LU X ICU), f- ; LL pi zi LU u z MIA {STAFF' COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page '1 of 26 to (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals i of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. �. (STAFF COMMENTS) , i 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your approval, if known. ,5ePA A.VJ5 'U t L D t N er— iP.Mrr (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. �G N5'f2t qr 3 - iJ=—VL-L 4Zz>L0&r, W 1 '62E TAT L IpF-F4Gr (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT17 0-8-91. MASTER Page 2 0£ 26 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,.and range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably, available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Ne L6-r t4oP--rH or- M A (1, 1 -=,T. (-,a 114, "� 5� A0& f4- 'Se8t: A-MACR6V frOrZ- (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS .1. Earth a. General description of the site. (circle one): Flat, rolhi hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: 6LO OMS AIE12"X- Ufa ffl?:PM fJ?=Qm T--�-r) (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? rp (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER �0 Page 3 of 26 i 1 t � t t � r tzv c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, suck)? If you,know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. _ I�a-t �CNo►NN (STAFF COMMENTS) d. - Are there surface indications or.history,of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. tA O j ri (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate yp pp quantities of any, filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. *XC�!>y'VA-ft� (STAFF COMMENTS) f. coma erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Al if so, generally describe. No 9L 01 9. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for ezample, asphalt or buildings)? 'Tv O/© -�J (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: K (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? if any, generally, describe and give approximate quantities if known. CoN5-rrzoc_-Tto4 1)vs,-r + Coms-Taurmo#4 C-tVuIpMEWT Au 646454 Lr__ (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No CHKLT/10-91.MA5TER Page 5 of 26 r C.' Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: fJctjr i F- W i. Vi (STAFF COMMENTS) ' c a 0; to to W i a Hi wA 3. WATER Q, a. Surface: u. d (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate h T vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal ? 1— streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, Z a describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what us UJI stream or river it flows into. i o- Z ui vs; (STAFF COMMENTS) U =: O ~ Z (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe available plans. j © (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would ;9 be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and C indicate the area of the site that would be affected." Indicate the source of fill material. �3 4� CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 6 of 26 4r,w RE �iSlr 4 M1417 aQtlsSVaci"32 4 7 1 ) 9 1 { 4 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) (zi F! (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or IQ diversions. give general description, purpose, and � U! approximate quantities if known. ai No w vS W N Q w} �QQ I- LL <' (STAFF COMMENTS) ui d Z w z F"! �- as Z �-. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. w Uu S U. ; U. . t!)! (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. f l (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1 ) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged" to ground water? Clive general description, propose, and approximate quantities if known. , j•gkMitS.. � hf1. CHKLT/10-8-89 MASTER Page ? of 26 s (STAFF COMMENTS) I-4 Z (2} Describe waste material that will be discharged into the LU �j ground. from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for �! example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the Ly 01 following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the �y °i general size of the system, the number,o£ such systems, the U) Si number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number C _3 of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. i - CnLL wO NG1N� i �d = w± Z H: (STAFF COMMENTS) F- QE Z ~i LU W, ,. ®: O ^ C. Water Runoff (including storm water): S tWj (1) Describe the'source of runoff (including storm water) and u.C)� Z' method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Will this water flow into other V �! S waters? If so, describe. f- O ! '� � COLZW / -rtaor- �X!�j 1rJ Z (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? if O so, generally describe. I�( o t ® (STAFF COMMENTS) v� CHKLTt10-8-91.MASTER Page 8 of 26 as w} L d �D za r 61 a zr Fo z w ua �0 V- a L- H` u. C 2 v u. O F z t® CHKLT/10-8-81-MASTER K birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, others le"U UC mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Page 10 of 26 RLI C CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 11 of 26 (nW J h (no Lu 2� J LL D � 3`: Z I— ,. o LU W U cr OH W LL x = u- C �2 U(J Oh Z F0 r x Z , f s , ,k7 �Ir } b. Would your project affect the,potential use of solar °energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N U (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the f ; 3 plans of this proposal? (STAFF COMMENTS) S; • s T. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. 1�I oN� k (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 12 of 26 r � ? x � t ..___... ._. _ ....�..,....,,.u+�w«.:...•...a....,w.W..a:c..w�Yr.+mrv..nmewmae..:a>ewr .>.,.a:+........ ._.....� _.�._: �.: _ (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Me N.s . Z{ H WI - - cc �! ". UO!: (STAFF COMMENTS) Cy us W LU F2- ' ca LL Ub. Noise LLJ Q' (Ij What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your cad project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, =: other)? zo W Lu; n 0 v cn LU h-i e LU (STAFF COMMENTS) Lh 01 .. Z, - W Ca' f, r (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or O Z associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Ca HgTrzc� c 7i o r� Ld N C3 TO R'F�G } (STAFF -COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:. t4f9NC— (STAFF COMMENTS) CHWAO-8.91WASTER Page 13 of 26 " k La "k S. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? VU-15 ID E;Wrl A4- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures an the site. PE61 VEMC-c-a- (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? if so, what? V&54 CE 14 CIS (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? -f 5Cr CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 14 of 26 f t i ..t rrs.. .udwrNru..ue.2.uuvnw...iu.nwr.r..r.rwsw.ni..+vr�.n«L....«r+xrvr.+ni�svawr...i...`...,.�... x < •.....'r ,.. _. . .. .... ...... .... ..:. _ .. .. II. _ .' ,'" .:.. (STAFF COMMENTS) z4 a UJj f'. , What is the current coempprehensive plan designation of the site? cc 2�_ " p` .. LU ta' ' to � cn w Ni WO (STAFF COMMENTS) C� Q ' u. N d 2 9. If applicable, what is the current _shoreline master plan a- designation of the site? w w c.> ar t =cU }� Fi (STAFF COMMENTS) u. p. Z UJ UY O~ 2 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. t4 o i T> (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? gi - to a�pE to 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (mran (STAFF COMMENTS) tt CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 16 of 26 Cxxon0-8-9l.Mmoren ` `, ``� Page 17 of 26 to d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12.- Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the A immediate vicinity? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displice any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: CHKLT/10-8-9l.MASTER Page 19 of 26 E 0 . . . . . . . . . . . 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed car or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally de cribe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. C f4c— (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 0 t4 C— (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show onL p ans, if any. 59-P Ave , tA iik aAwAy C-Ur-0. C(J:r 0t-4 16"— term_ Ancegs -rej AU_ZJ STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/1 0-8-91 -MASTER Page 20 of 26 Wev 1= UJ Lu i U) 0 LL T) UJ 3: z z W LU to Or W LIJ u. c LU Cf, z to CHKLTII0-8-91.MASTER AN( f. Now many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. HOT kmowkI �Z = z. W+ p; (STAFF COMMENTS) U) uJ; s HI rna i gg. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if C ti any:,LL FLU` I zr ii Zp I uJ w, (STAFF COMMENTS) I - 10 UJ W = Ui u. p, 15. Public Services U It a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services 0 t- (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. t4 O --- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: NoN� i® Page 22 of 26 z tt D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) !! Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in t Z 1 conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. x+ ~ w' rG g' When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the p 9 � . proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item UU O Di at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the 9 y proposal were not N implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. � F-I u.l 1. -How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; - d Ui emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous g substances; or production of noise? �Q. U. � = Lti �s i F :•: Z '.' W LUG... •... ,. Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: ©- O N; , w Lu W, ; Zi w 01- 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or { Z marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? { J ' i 1� �ar CHKLT/10.8.91.MASTER Page 24 of 26 ® � � x -k .. •• ... .. ._...... ... .«..........,...�.anr:...............rruruauuNmKNCfzle.�.VYlap�ab�"ra..wxMYraM+unswii+mttvn4lNnwxawbbtiPr+•.iifkYfXMx1�.15u-.d..w+w..,..MN+-...c.r....w.,...._....__.. ».......:... ._...II. µ Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources ' are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive area designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to 'protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: r S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation : or public services and utilities? t'1 CHKLT/10-5 91.MASTER Page 25 Of 26 77 w Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) ares ■ta 0 s �,��ei �,.l�;rnr.•' �!,`!��i�)�,,.1J/�i�r'/,?lrr�i`,�r�-ll,l:� Mmoo jii�illi�l-■ I,II� '111111111111111111111 7 O w� U. Bj Ln C1 s w z P, �0 z} w w, a; U N� 01 _ U1I z vy o'er z t®. 4 • , , ` " OPE ON THIS SIDE iNMN Bo") I r, 8308 000 205 00 '._ 4344 006 012 01 ;4344 006 003 00 THIRD AVE. PdLAZA LTD._ SUZIE REYNOLDS ERLENE BENISH 2025 1st Ave •,;#1000 S = 212 Capers St. 117 '4th Ave. N Seattle.'WA .,98101 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 006 001 01 & 00 4344 006\004 00 8308 000,201.00 JACQUE MAYO WELL PARTNERSHIP LAURIE LUOMA �,., 315 Main St 123 4th Ave. N. 120 3rd Ave. S _.201 Edmonds, WA 98020- Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA '98020 8308 000 202,00 4344 016 005 03 4344 006 005 00 HELEN JESSEN DENA BLATT GREG WILSON 120 3rd Ave. S #202 316 Main St. 133 4th Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 '8308 000 203 00 ' 4548 001 013'00 '` 4344 007 008 00 Paul Simonton MAR-VEL MARBLE PORTERFIELD LIMITED 120 3rd Ave. S'#203 P.O. Box 0 201 Main St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds,, WA 98020 ' Edmonds, WA 98020 8308 000 204 00 , KENNETH MORGAN 3rd Ave. S #204 wROy FREDERICKSON ,4344 006 008 00 Edm WA 98020 P.O. Box'488 MARGARET MILLER .Edmonds, 8308 000 204 00 Edmonds WA '98020 , 124 3rd Ave. N. 4548 001 012 00 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 016 005 01 4548 001 011 00 4344 007 005 00 ANN TURNER LORETTA SORENSON ROBERT ULLMAN P.O. Box 458 220 Main St. 131 3rd Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 016 005 02 4344 007 001 00 4548 001 009 01 HENRIETTA BLOCK METROPOLITAN FEDERAL CONNEL SOUTH 5026 84th Ave SE 229 Main St. 102 3rd Ave. S. Mercer Island, WA98040 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 006 012 02 4344 007 004 02 4548 001 009 02 CLAIRES LTD. MURPHY, HOPPER PARTNERS CHARLES`SHEPHERD' 301 Main St. 430 Bell St 31000 P.O. Box 416 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 4344 016 003 00 4548 001 003 00 4344 016 011 00 CORP. REAL ESTATE.NW THOMAS TINDALL FRONTIER BANK 306 Main St 126 3rd Ave. S P.O. Box 2115 Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 Everett, WA 98201 Dim & Carrie Markezinis 4344 007 007 003 00 RICH EADIE Warren LaFon r ' 18826 Fremont Ave. N. P,O. Box 187 3 4 h Av 2 t N -` �dmonR, W&�98020 Shoreline, WA 98133 Edmonds, WA 98020 ry=� $' y ADJACENT PROPERTY QVMEEM LIST �j Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. W � UJ us Cn U On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. Z I- z I- z Si66a re of Applicant or A licant's Repres ntative w w! ai Subscribed and sworn to before me this �Onday o a -- — C] F i W Lu ; S � ,io,ago�oo�p��+ r •••°Y,. B,q,S! °+,+ ZI •��i Eip'y w us '� QtARy'�' r . o ary Publ' in and for the State of Washington s V ��`�04=0 h r.9 9. Residing atWP5`�;,••• to L 1 { ti APO.doc\LATempWbrms �y41�y„et? "Own