The URL can be used to link to this page

110 JAMES ST.PDF1111111111111111803 110 JAM ES ST 0 T TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: ;-?2 a 7D'3I —o Sq — 06D -7 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): I(I —0'736T COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: ��°I 0,;L6Z Y M/A I q1. D l l 7d d q36� �( 4 CRITICAL'AREAS : "I�" , '�' l J I DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required k*aiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: � DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: i Z) i 10I PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: I I SEWER LID FEE $: / LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DA' SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) SOILS REPORT DA STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: rI15IWO (_ BLOCK: d►r►�i�� r��r�i►�r, >.� ��>�n►ri��19611.0Tmri/Il]1 211roL LATEMP\DST's\Forms\Street File Checklist:doc 0 • OEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Wav). Suite 16 Bellevue. %VA 98005 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Bob Henning c/o Barker Architects 8715 NE 119th Street Kirkland, Washington 98034 STREET FILE Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Elderly Housing Development James Street and 2nd Avenue Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Henning: May 27, 1994 JN 94175 RE Ca, IVg OCT2 3 1995 PERMIT COUNTER We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the three proposed elderly housing buildings to be constructed at the northwest corner of James Street and 2nd Avenue in Edmonds, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site sur- face and subsurface conditions and then developing this report to provide design criteria for --foundations, retaining walls, and pavements, and recommendations for general earthwork. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-3317, dated May 3, 1994. The subsurface conditions of the proposed development site were explored with seven test pits that encountered varying depths of fill. Peat*das encou�ntered in�all but three;of tFie'test .,pats/ Ifi'is ou�.opinion that the`buildingsshoulc! be�supporteon° d augercast concreie piers. It is possible to use conventional foundations on the west side of the southernmost building. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. James R. Finley, Jr., P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC- June2, 1994 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way). Suite 16 Bellevue, %VA 98005 JN 94175 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Bob Henning - c/o Barker Architects 8715 Northeast 119th Street Kirkland, Washington 98034 Subject: Additional Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Proposed Elderly Housing Development James Street and 2nd Avenue Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Henning: On w,tM,yai27r1',99,;4, we provided you with a geotechnical engineering report for your proposed elderly housing development to be constructed at the northwest corner of James Street and 2nd n . mondst in Avenue E I 'ih istce port; � d ,p !!K, y,.. m nded�that•ttiestructuresbe�` ..-plac�ed��ai]gec'ast;'piles� - � We now understand that you may place basements under the three buildings.*Ifbasements �aie�const ""f ender"the buildings��at`=least�two�of��tlie�,buildirigs�may;beconstructed on �� centio al outldatio s: No exploratiori was conducted in the vicinity of Building A, so the depthof�un citable' soils' is not known in this location. In Buildings B and C, the depth of loose soils, peat, and silt varied from 8 tp 13 f an 8-foot basernent is constructed, we would recommend that the unsuitable soils be over cavated and r,;,placed with structural fill, controlled -density fill, or lean mix concrete. Since groundwater was encountered in some of the test pits, we anticipate that temporary = dewatering will be required to place structural fill and to construct the buildings.. A -perm= lr, anent�dewatering system,woul'd -be required to ensure that:.t ie..basements are maintained Irco dit oni This dewatering system would consisVofann underslab drainage system consis g" of regularly -spaced perforated pipes In a bed of at least 12 Inches of free draining crushed or washed rock. The construction joints should be made waterproof, using water stops or other means. Waterproofing panels, Volelay or another similar system, should be used on the basement walls. If positive drainage from the foundation system' cannot be achieved, a sump pump would be required along with a backup system in case ! ' of pump or power supply failure. In general, if positive drainage to a storm water system is unavailable, we do not recommend the construction of the basements. 0 • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Elderly Housing Development 2nd Avenue and James Street Edmonds, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed elderly housing development to be constructed adjacent to the ferry waiting area in Edmonds, Washington. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. The plans provided to us show the development will consist of three, three- story buildings. It is assumed that the buildings will be constructed near the existing grade. We have not been provided with a site survey or other details of the building construction. Surface The irregular -shaped property is bordered on the east by 2nd Avenue, on the south by Dayton Street, and on the north by James Street. The Edmonds -Kingston ferry waiting area, adjacent to State Route 104 (Edmonds Way), is on the west side of the property. The northwest and southeast corners of the site are paved parking lots. A metal -framed building and a concrete block building are on the southwest corner of the lot. The remainder of the site is landscaped with grass, trees, and shrubs. The site is relatively level. Subsurface The ubsurfacecconditlor s were;explore`d l* excavating'•seven-test,"pits>'at the approximate locations shown on"the 'Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction, the site access, the scope of work outlined in our proposal, and the time and budget constraints. The test pits were excavated `on'May 1 ' 1994 with a rubber -tired backhoe: A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered. 'Grab' samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 through 6. :Test pits 1 to 3 on the southwest part of the property encountered 3 feet of fill and topsoil overlying weathered glacial till, which became dense at a depth of 6 to 8 feet below the ground surface. The remainder of the test pits encountered peat below the fill soils. GEO11:CH CONSUI_TAKIN, INC. 0 • Bob Henning May 27, 1994 JN 94175 Page 2 _'--Silty sands�were found.,afi a depth of 1;O.to j a,feeYbelow-the round surface in the test lts' which :.encountered ..peat; No exploration was conducted in the area of the proposed no�i uilding because of the existing development. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. Compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soils will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. Group' vy*er see pageXwas�obser;►ed at afdepthkof-5 feet'in.te`sY`:pits, 4:and 5 The test pits were left open for only a short time period, and therefore the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwaterlevels vary'seasonally"'with=;-ainfatI' CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS \b General It is our�op ion�th tr a buiold't gs�sliould�bessupported,on.d riven. pile .or augercast',piers betcause of�thepoorisoil,conditione` The peat and organic soils are hi hly compressible. If a foundation were placed on these soils and the overlying fill soils, c nsiderable foundation settlement would occur. Based on the test pit results, it appears th it would be possible to place the western perimeter of the south building on conventional foundations on the glacial till. The footings would need to be placed at a depth of 5 to 7 feet below the ground surface on the dense soils to prevent differential settlement between the pier or pile foundations and the conventional foundations: Therefore, it is our recommendation that the entire structure be placed on pier or pile foundations, even if some of its piers or piles are relatively short.,`4,r The building floor slab should be structurally supported. Careful attention should be paid to the building entrances. Based on past experience, we recommend that the entrance walkway slabs be supported on one end by the foundation crOW--_aI cnNsuLIANIs, INC. Bob Henning May 27, 1994 JN 94175 Page 3 grade beam and that the slab be designed to span 10 feet without support. The trenches of +� the sanitary sewer lines should extend through the peat or the lines should be constructed ._ of ductile iron and be pile supported. The potable water lines should be constructed of ductile iron with restrained joints unless the peat below the pipe is removed. The to a"�yaximy m; of30to�35 fee. �naybe,fequir�ed To further define soils conditions and to assist with project cost estimating, we recommend that two borings be drilled in the northern building footprint through the existing parking lot and that one boring be drilled in each of the two other building footprint locations. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, develop- ment, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. RRMTIM t u• The proposed structure may be supported on sound, pressure -treated, timber piles driven into the underlying sand or glacial till soils. The piles shou!d conform to the specifications as outlined in the Uniform Building standard. Timber piles should have a minimum tip diameter of 8 inches. Timber piles should be placed no closer than three pile diameters, center -to -center. An allowable compressive pile capacity of 25 tons can be used for piles driven to refusal. Refusal is defined as 30 blows per foot for the last 1 foot of driving, when driven with a hammer having a rated energy of 15,000 foot-pounds. The piles should be marked in 1400t increments to facilitate the recording of blow counts during the driving process. The pile number should be clearly marked on the location stake. We recommend that the piles be driven with a steam, air, or diesel hammer with fixed leads. We anticipate that pile lengths will vary between 10 and 30 feet below the existing grade. Because soil conditions can be variable, we recommend that at least six test piles be driven before ordering the production piles to obtain a more accurate estimate of the pile lengths needed and to determine driving characteristics. The test piles and the hammer used should be the same type as those to be used in the production driving. Geotech Consultants personnel should observe the installation of both the test piles and the production piles on a full-time basis. G[OIT-CH CONSULTANTS, INC 9 Bob Henning May 27, 1994 JN 94175 Page 4 We anticipate that timber piles which are driven to refusal will have total or differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by the piles and by passive pressure on the grade beams. We anticipate that vertical piles will have a lateral capacity of 1 ton per pile. Additional lateral loads can be resisted by battered piles, friction between the slab and the subgrade, and passive earth pressures on the grade beams. Piles may be battered at an angle of 1:5 (Horizontal: Vertical) without any reduction of vertical load capacity. The lateral capacity of a battered pile can be assumed to be equal to the horizontal component of the axial capacity. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by a fluid having a density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Augercast Concrete Piers capacity of 20! tons 'can :be,'attained 2 inc wind or seismic loads, the_allowable pier -capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center -to -center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. We estimate thatttotal'�settlement of single `piers' installed as described above, WiIP be. on the' or�derof one=haff;inch Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post -construction settlement would be realized as the live -loads are applied. We estimate differential settlements over any portion of the structures should be less than about one -quarter inch. We recommend that the piers be reinforoed:their: entire length-1 The piers can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 10 feet below the ground surface for computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soils against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive earth resistance of 150 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that exerted by an equivalent fluid having a density of 250 pcf. Augercast piers should be installed with continuous flight, hollow -stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. Often, the augering action may tend to disturb the soils at the bottom of GEOIEC1I CONSULTANTS, INC Bob Henning May 27, 1994 JN 94175 Page 5 the drilled holes, possibly resulting in decreased end -bearing capacity. To minimize the effects of this disturbance, we recommend that the piie contract* ybe required to X In o der to maintain ttie °su66, ofi`the"pumped grout' above ,the' ,tip of the auger; we.. fig'` e o ,;,rnene,�foltowin , fi� Maintain a minimum grout head of 5 feet above the tip of the auger at all times. LEnsure that the grout pressure at the grout pump is in the range of 150 to 250 psl, depending on the length of feeder hose used. �3)Equip the grout pump with a calibrated stroke counter so that grout 4r volumes per pier may be calculated. As the completed below -ground pier below cannot be observed, judgement and experience must be used as the basis for determining the acceptability of a pier. We recommend that the installation of all piers be observed by a representative of Geotech Consultants, Inc., who can fully evaluate the contractor's operation, collect and interpret installation data, verify bearing stratum elevations, and understand the implications of variations from normal procedures with respect to the design criteria. KITIO-ITMO•1 . .� The site is located within Seismic Zone 3 as illustrated on Figure No. 23-2 of the 1991 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 23-J of the 1991 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S3. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the later:.al earth pressures imposed by the soils they retain. The following recommended design parameters ;are for -walls less than 12 feet in height -which restrain level backfill ` GE011:01 CONSUI.TAN IN, INC. Bob Henning May 27, 1994 Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 250 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.35 Soil Unit Weight 120 pcf Where: (1) pcf is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid densities. * For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. JN 94175 Page 6 �We e�commend afety yfacto of a „t {t:`5 Nfor:overtummg and siiding, -.when using ;the 1 abo��e� cecornmende�dalues to ,designthekwa The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind the wall can typically be accounted forby adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy' ns ruc on' equipme�t� would not ;walls yirithih'i distance equal to the height+o rl additional lateral+pressures resulting:fromAl ,wall'ishouldtbewaccomplished with hand ope w overloaded by the Higher soil forces that occ >ei;operated. behindLjetaining; arid. foundation the wall; unless;the walls,Ar'q designed for -the e.,equipment.,Compactiort of backfill near>the atedaequipment�to=pceventthib�wall'from being =: rduring compaction. Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free -draining tttUctural fill containing no organics`. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have'rio gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 GEOTTCI I CONSULTANTS, INC. Bob Henning JN 94175 May 27, 1994 Page 7 eFor increased protection, a drainage net should be laced along the cut p- P 9 P 9 slope face, and the wall should be backfilled with pervious soil. The re that, = ,t�he�design cntena for the:- peFmeab'le oil o topsoil; o the surfac should"benpavedThe sub -section entitled tnL §, ,� .,._ _ _.,.,.._ General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below -grade walls. If moist conditions or some seepage through the walls is not acceptable, then damp -proofing or waterproofing should be provided. This could include limiting cold joints and wall penetrations, and possibly using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but it will help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. No excavated slopes are anticipated other than for utility trenches. However, in no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet in unsaturated soils may be attempted vertically. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the s6iUY peat tfie subject site would.be'classlfied, as T e' C: ;Therefore tem ora forizontal!Vertical)? extending,,�continuouslyobetwdbiiz�the` top': a''d" he`, fiott The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites having similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. rTeFn pprary ,cut, slopes should be, protected. -with. -plastic sheeting during wets l weather.- The cut slopes should also'lie backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce .` ... 61, potential for instability. Drainage Considerations We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of footings, where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below the structure, (2) the slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downwards from the building., Drains should also be placed GEO"n'.C1I CONSULTANTS. IN(' Bob Henning May 27,1994 .k.. - 166U'Ii6=6,611 backfie a -retaininin'.-v 7.-incn s,oi,i-incn,-minus.�.wasnea,,,rocK 140N, Supac 4NO' orsim'ilaie material). JN 94175 Page 8 rhes6:drAjnt should be sUrroundedbV at 50ed'.1n,.non-woven aeotextila filter fabric, `loll'f&ea"Ald'-suff&86� Wgtgr 'drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain . system. For the best long-term performance, 16iididloi,-�the`f rig,,,- 4P Q P�qffotAt&k V '?Oip n�rpcqmrr ad r a", ;'4� The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand ip area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed Aite,,-.9radft-IiV' iis idla6bht Pavement Areas All pavement sections may be supported on structural fill or existing fill, provided these soils can be compacted to a 95 percent density and are in a stable, non -yielding condition at the time of paving. Structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. ,,rebom'—''0eMnd,R0w� ng"tUdSSNP`` Crd'bliPtr 'p&ManfadtuRhibrblbummp,I K 'A 0P6�", N76Vbfias Su1V61 nAtte 'chaactenstics. . WWAF-4W.; .Ins REPOW Ar 11h n- Ar 5umciureui,Til"Wliswize� neTSVMgra Ofexep_tq� yry,sftar.ed§*hgiild di fill bdUI& d r d. ThJ6-gubgr-a-de." sh6uld' be 'evaluated by Geotech Consultants; n6.afte'r'the site is stripped and cut to grade. R-"677k'c"6.';ffi'M'.ler-i'd-1-6-ti--'b'-n-'s-J6r-'co�OP-Mion of'strUchitail Ill -ben'eath7_' , ripe a mqnts.:yar&j!blyen. "-.'I,iiter:.�su7b--secitidh;',Mtiled - General` EiirtStructural e performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability- of the. underlying subgrade. ,area -2 Inches of .,i4par ing,, s should consist of a (AC)-bvdr+,4jnC. 4es;ptcrU. R6),oi..31n6hes* of asphalt- ffiaV646�ilr94o6-d'iri"as- be providbd;with 3 Inches of -AT Heavily loaded -main - ibU.,01113; or riches -of are typically "d. hn'%veW"R`YV nd dumpsfer 'sites. ,.' The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented In this report are based on our experience In the area and on what has been successful In similar situations. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. G EOTE C1 I CONS U LTAN-1 INC. a Bob Henning JN 94175 May 27, 1994 Page 9 All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soils, pavements, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but could be used in non-structural areas such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compac- tion equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the loose lift thickness exceed 12 inches. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Mi irnurnRe ative tFill Placement IV i,g n/e�a/th fgotings slabs, o� Behind�retaintng:.walls x9„0'/V BeneathFpavementsF : 9.5, for4 pp' a 1i2fln hes._. r, N p . of{�subgrad below .90% that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed In percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined In accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil having a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. GEOIECH CONSULTANTS, INC I Bob Henning May 27, 1994 LIMITATIONS JN 94175 Page 10 The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soils encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommendedihat�tFe Lo..: �[s.•eS2'f::.j:s.:."P..fr:'Xf'.r.T.l`.rr.'. •_. ... .., .. . s rs a standard recommendation for all proiects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Bob Henning and his representatives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analy- ses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accord- ance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. The scope of our work did not include an environmental assessment, but we can provide this service, if requested. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. Api Pit 06-IMOMWIL91 Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those Indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and :ecifica- tions, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface condi- tions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and their er,1ployees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the r::spons- ibility of the contractor. GGOTIiCH CONSUI.TAMS, INC. Bob Henning May 27, 1994 JN 94175 Page 11 The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Pit Logs Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or 9 we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. JRF:dew Attachments FI4 --� X C. rISTES EXPIRES g / 17 / 9 Y James R. Finley, Jr., P.E. Principal (;I:(YII:CII CONSULTAN'IN. INC- i. • • , «)l .. J� � rye .. .. ..ii��: 1�• BIucKErrs • :i ' . ` . '.' : ' 'I'',I j ' BEACH 1 � PARK SITE ��• - I i All JVtkL 1 t .a��IB4Tn5 RR' ST 13� PUG MELODY LN Y7 / � t 9Rfl0i(MERF MIIOI[1 Ls Y bum i!/ ERE � s a d�D1 �_� AS = ST = „ !J SATER yt ; � T • u r'GLEN_ t <DALEY 124 5T u jSP E o « 0------ HILL it boo- s BELL ^ = ST J I MAT N DAY ION v- L 1%IRJHA I < uMa > NF MAPI` VILDLIFE 1 Motu a sAhcnmY NOWELL YYHEX -C PO =i ur Lot - ST N iAf 1 Yl SUN G_ I $ HAKAH a9rN i 'i• ' i. a 26 i < l fit f R BEL ' COOLA GEOTECH CONSULTANTS _ ELM st E ST BIRCH .i911111 .. st v- VICINITY MAP 2nd AVENUE AT DAME') STREET EDMONDS, WA F94176 MAY 1994 1 NMI 1❑ 5 "Z' e� 4 MCP USCS TEST PIT 1 De 3.0 Dark brown to black, gravelly, silty SAND, dry to moist, loose FILL (FILL) -copper wire running north to south 10.8 Reddish brown, gravelly, silty, medium to fine-grained SAND, very moist to wet, loose -becomes tan 13.2 -becomes gray, dense (Glacial Till) 10 Tesplt tei`m�nated ate O feet b gad o5194�r o_grundwater seepage encountered dunng excavahon. 15 o caving. TEST PIT 2 c 0 4 G° USCS Description Dark brown to black, gravelly, silty SAND, dry to moist, loose with FILL glass and asphalt debris (FILL) Dark brown, silty , very moist, loose Topsoil) Reddish brown, gravelly, silty, medium tofine-grained SAND, very 5 21.1 moist to wet, loose sM -becomes tan, wet -becomes gray, dense, very moist (Glacial Till) 10 Test.pit terminated.at.8 feet below.grade on 5-17-94. No gioundwaier'seepage encountered during excavation. No caving. 15 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS 2nd AVENUE AT JAMES STREET EDMONDS, WA Job No: Dale: L ogge cb!y:j Piale: 94175 MA Y 1994 JHS 3 USCS 5] TEST PIT 3 Gray, gravelly, silty SAND, dry, loose (FILL) -becomes black, moist with metal debris 741 Reddish brown, gravelly, silty, medium to fine-grained SAND, wet, loose 5 -becomes tan becomes gray, very moist,dense (Glacial Till) l 0 Test" termina ed at 8"feet be ow; rad' `oi5-`1.7.-94. ; o:=gundwate`'se' epage`e c'-t'e_rYeddring exc�avabon. No caving. 15 4V USCS 0 FILL 7.9 FILL 5 � +�T 30.9 TEST PIT 4 Brown, silty SAND with a trace of gravel, dry, loose (FILL) Blue/gray, gravelly, silty SAND, very moist, loose (FILL) -becomes wet Brown, fibrous PEAT with small diameter logs & abundant organics JIM11 Blue/gray, silty SAND, saturated, loose NN Tannish brown, gravelly, silty SAND; very moist, medium-densel6 I -becomes dense Test pit terminated at 11 feet below grade on 5-17-94. 15F Groundwater seepage encountered at 5.5 feet during excavation. Moderate caving at 4-8 feet. GEOTECH C ONSUTA'ANTS. INC:. TEST PIT LOGS 2nd AVENUE AT JAMES STREET EDMONDS, WA n : Dote: Logged by: Pete: 75 MAY 1994 JNS 4 1❑ USCS TEST PIT 5 Dark brown, silty, fine-grained SAND with a trace of gravel, moist, loose (FILL) Brown, gravelly, slightly silty, coarse to medium -grained SAND, 14.1 r loose (FILL) 5 [' I I I -becomes wet, concrete debris Vol 21.9 15 101 Brown, fibrous PEAT with wood & organic debris, saturated, loose UG°c USCS FILL 5 369.5 - H Brown, peaty SILT with abundant organics, wet, loose Blue/gray, slighty silty, medium to fine-grained SAND, wet, medium -dense Test pit terminated at 14 feet below grade on 5-17-94. Groundwater seepage encountered at 6 feet during excavation. Moderate caving. TEST PIT 6 Grayish brown, gravelly, silty SAND, moist, loose to medium -dense -becomes wet, loose Brown, fibrous PEAT with wood & organic debris, saturated, loose Blue/gray, gravelly, silty SAND with'&i- es of organics, wet, loose -becomes medium -dense, no organics 15 Test pit terminated at 12 feet below grade on 5-17-94. Groundwater seepage encountered at 4 feet during excavation. Caving at 3-6 feet. GEOTECH C ONSLWI AN S. INC;. TEST PIT LOGS 2nd AVENUE AT JAMES STREET EDMONDS, WA Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 94175 MA V 1994 JNS 5 TEST PIT 7 O G° USCS Descri tip Gray, gravelly, silty SAND, moist, loose -becomes bluish gray, medium -dense FILL -becomes wet, loose 5 10 Brown, fibrous PEAT, wet, loose Blue/gray, gravelly, silty SAND, wet, loose to medium -dense 151 TeAAs}} •pitftemilna 'chat-Alv Q eet byye�pl�o�wgrawdew on S 17�9(4 �` i T'S� T"Vrt"AA.a4 d7 t�� 195A•t1SiRx'.l , rourr ovate see ^agerencounteredrdunng.excavation Shdht"caving. Cr GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. r TEST PIT LOGS 2nd AVENUE AT JAMES STREET EDMONDS, WA EV: I: Date: Loggedby: Plate: MA Y 1994 JHS 6 Slope bockfill owoy from foundation. --, BACKFIL L See text for requirements. WASHED ROCK •oe NONWOVEN GEOT£XTILE FILTER FABRIC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TIGHTLINE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to footing drain. VAPOR BARRIER SLAB FREE - DRAINING SAND/GRAVEL 4" PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert a1 least as low as fooling and/or crawl space. Slope to drain. Place weepholes downward. FOOTING DRAIN DF ;FAIL 2nd AVENUE AT JAMS:#: .STREET EDMONDS, W ; Job No.Dole : co:: poll: 94176 MAY 19947 0 O_ TP-8 O PROPOSED BUILDING ' a !l � �tt I 2nd AVENUE ate- 1 LEGEND: Q APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION f GEOTECH 2nd AVENUE AT JAMES CONSULTANTS EDMONDS, WA 'p4776 1 MAY lsB4 T OEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. October 4, 1995 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 JN 94175 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Homestyle Construction 121 - 5th Avenue North, Suite 203 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Marty Sdadafora Subject: Additional Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Proposed Edmonds Financial Center 2nd Avenue South at James Street Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Sdadafora: On May 24, 1994, Geotech Consultants, Inc. prepared a geotechnical engineering study for a proposed project located at the southwestern corner of James Street and 2nd Avenue South in Edmonds. In this report, we recommended that the proposed building be placed on pile foundations, and that the building floor slab be structurally supported. Since reviewing our report, you have proposed.that a building be constructed on the northern portion of the subject lot, and that this building be placed on .conventional foundations following the placement of lean -mix concrete down to bearing soils. The proposed elevation of the new building is 13.6 feet. This will result in an excavation of 4 to 6 feet on the downslope side of the building and an excavation of up to 12 feet in the upper northeastern corner of the building. We recently observed the excavation of six additional test pits near the property lines for the proposed building. The locations of these test pits are illustrated on the attached Site Exploration Plan. A summary of the test pit logs is also attached. The depth to competent soils varied from more than 1-2 feet at the northwestern corner to approximately 8 to 9 feet on the western side of the project near 2nd Avenue South. Caving soils were encountered in Test Pits 12 thro:agh 14 on the northwestern corner of the site. Groundwater was encountered near an elevation of 12 feet on the lower portion of the site. The groundwater levels were not monitored. This seepage level therefore simply represents the seepage level in the test pit at the time of excavation. We anticipate that groundwater levels may increase in wetter times of the year. Based upon the results of our new explorations, it is still our recommendation that at least a portion of the building be supported on augercast piers. Conventional foundations are possible on the western side of the site, where competent soils will be exposed in the i OCT 0 " 1995 --------------------------- J Homestyle Construction JN 94175 October 4, 1995 Page 2 footing excavation. The amount of conventional foundations may be increased by using lean -mix concrete where it is feasible to excavate to competent soils. It is our opinion that this method is unfeasible in the areas of Test Pit 8 and Test Pits 12 through 14. We therefore recommend the use of augercast piers in these areas. The exact location of the augercast piers can be determined by our personnel at the time of excavation. We recommend that the foundation design include alternatives for both conventional foundations and augercast piers. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used to design conventional foundations. Slabs placed on organic soil will experience some settlement. It appears that some temporary shoring will be required unless easements can be obtained from the City of Edmonds within the James Street and 2nd Avenue South right-of-ways. As shown on the civil engineering drawings, the building will be located adjacent to the property line at least along James Street. The maximum allowable cut is 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) above the groundwater level, and we do not recommend open cuts below the groundwater level, which is at an elevation of about 12 feet. The 1:1 (H:V) slope cannot extend to the edge of the street. Traffic should be kept back behind a line that has an inclination of 2:1 (H:V) from the base of the excavation in the area of Test Pits 12 and 13. Drainage is a concern on the subject site, since the proposed building excavation will be near the historic high -tide level. As discussed in our meetings, we recommend that underslab drainage be provided in case water levels rise to near the bottom of the slab. A tidal gate should be placed in the storm drainage system where the drains have an elevation lower than the maximum high tide. If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. i Q. James R. Finley, Jr., P.E. Principal JRF:dew Attachments: Site Exploration Plan Summary of Test Pit Logs Gr01TCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Proposed Edmonds Financial Center 2nd Avenue South at James Street Edmonds, Washington SUMMARY OF TEST PIT LOGS Depth to Test Pit # Depth of Fill Depth of Peat* Competent Soils Comments 8 6 feet 10 feet 11 feet -- 9 4 feet 3 feet 8 feet -- 10 4 feet no peat 5.5 feet -- 11 4.5 feet no peat 9 feet -- 12 6 feet 1.5 feet 9 feet some caving 13 8 feet 3 feet 12 feet severe caving 14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 feet 3 feet 11 feet moderate caving Notes: * ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Depth to the bottom of the peat strata. GEO"IECH CONSULTANTS, INC. CA > NO. �ritical _ Areas Checklist Site Information (sods/topography/hydrology/vegetation) ' 1.- Site AddresskQ 2. Property Taz=Account Number P s (;: :.......; .: L PEAMLT"L'�� jR 3. Approximate Site Size acres or sgaare feet):oj'Ydyt�-_ N T 4. Is this site currentlydeveloped� yes; no �"%% If yeshow'-is site developed?.�rpl� r rR� ; f " ' .�! 4ir.W W.m .. ' 1+. Ke iP t O : .'<,." .•.' •M,' 4Y^ Y. � • ,tA , Ja.: .. _ _ 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. ,.Flat jess4than 5-feet-elevation changeover entire site+r il,, i" i'Rolll R� f ` {, ti> .�..• s • Y' t :a . ng• slopes on site geiierallq less than 159b��(a vertical ase -of 10 feet over a 10 14614.. horiwi nt distance of 66-feet). � '+.,.1"� Hilly {, slopes present on safe of more than 15% and.less than' 30'%.,( a vertical rise ! • r�i'LJ.�,��S.ai�..`r•ia.4yd•'.. y.• �� s`. tx. e+'3 -.. ': t• •r .r •JS. 4•. 1''. ...: t... _ l ... .ii of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66=feet). -,Steep'�. `grades of greater. than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal.diistance. of less than r - "if3a�.f /}�"�:�,:�i`iif`7f: •.f.. a_ihe, .'3 ..t G a .l: 33—feet)..:iN. i ' ... - ; i '�.; t Vuie%(pjease describe):, . .;' p Pl�:y. `�.yi�•:��{'yV ✓:c+''ii": L.. ... � - '. •` L` 6. Site coniains2A y *g water. : c._ g ea3s of gear=round staiid' in -,�Approx.'Depth: 7. •tf-;�rc+�"il fr?�; �of a?Y%T:>' =f•a�'''�'";"a'. if S;' Site contains areas seater: water: V/ ,O Approx.. Depth: •b4i•. c'd: -mot:. What-season(s) of the year? 8. Site is'in•the'.fl y; �r± p of a water'oourse: oodwa 1/�=^ 'flood lain 9. Site'contains a cra—or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? 'V.46 ' " ' 'Flows are seasonal? (What time;of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ' . ' ' ; mixed ; urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)_ . 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: 4�p Rcv 011M4 "�:7�y;}c .i{A'bt�.•1{�. r. . L i_ � ' ��t ' 1 Sr+�na�t� J�,�.f�� t•J.. . �r�'�� c�- ��'� .tE�'y'��'t� �. , r r _i City of Edmonds Critical.. Areas --Ch ecklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to ;be. filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds, prior to his/her submittal of a development' permit to the City. - - The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are. %piay,be_ be present on the subject propertq.'* The:., information needed to complete` the"' Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, LF�1 -, wand submit it to the City. The City will .; review, .the. checklist, make a precursory site visit,' anti ,make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. ". With a signed copy`of this form, the appl' t should also submit a vicinity map <: "Or plot plan or individual lots of the parcel _with enough detail that City staff can find and identify, the subject parcel(s). In :' addition, the applicant shall include . other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist stag in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best'of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Applicant Representative: Name y ate, Street Address Strom Address .r City, State, ZIP Phone City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Signature D ate 1. i «w,J� 11111111, flog 96 " e CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT 1890 199° PERMIT No 0779 Address of Construction: 4/��, Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Contractor: /' C, State License NoZilkl& A-ela S SQL_ ❑ Single Family g Multi -Family XCommercial ❑ Public (No. of Units "I ) TMENT PLANT .1VEED JUN 2 6 1996 PUBLIC WORKS Building Permit No. q Sy 7 3 9, 0 Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No ❑ Yes RW Construction Permit No. � 6� Cross. other Private Property No ❑ Yes n Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement rify that e read and shall comply with all city requirements indicate the back of the Permit Card. Co z� Date I * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION .OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771 , PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. It Permit Fee: Issuedd By Trunk Charge: 1 Date Issued: a9 Assessment Fee: J LZ D Receipt No.: Lid No.: GPI DM e!•2z6yIniti ea Partial Inspection: �.k. ,"6uT �� __c(o s I A�o SP, Comments ' Reason Rejected: Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date -? � i Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Bull Copy: Applicant Revised 3!90 t The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENTNO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION Eg REPAIRS ❑ LID NO ................... .ASMT. NO.p.................. BUJ OWNER -. i.7M%1N�S Fo -QIAL.......C6NTea......... CONTRACTOR ... L-.C,.JA................................................................ PERMIT NO. 9.779-- JOB ADDRESS ..... 1.1Q....... SAME's....... S-T...................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. .................................... .. BLOCK NO. ......... ::— ................ -.-.. --•-•-••-•------•-•--....-•...............................•--......--.....------.......--•-•-......-•---....................._ NAMEOF ADDITION.................•---....---------•--................------------....-•--------.............--...................... i� 44 110 J AMES ST. I 00�-� 59. se, t iy' 31- I i „ 411C.O. 10 SUArACE To SuRFi1Ct, ExIST f � s - 4 PWW-0001-11175 (REV.11/78) ZKO Av. So. . W 4'c.o. To SURFACE r I aFROM BL.CG • 4"t.o. wsc 7' 13Ww ST. GRADC. s-� CAP To SURFACE 4%.A. c.Ap To ,Sul%MA FROM BOG. c.oRN F.R FARTtoL 40'«D•79- -1-W.. DATE 7 -- .... 7-....... BY .... Water Service Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ............................................ NEW CONSTRUCTION 2/— REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . .................. .ASMT. NO................... OWNER CONTRACTOR ............... PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS ....................................................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ...................................... BLOCK NO . .................................... J• N I NAMEOF ADDITION..:..-•..........................................................•--........--•---..................................... t;� La. / 1 Y4 CoPPe� .�a•nes s�'. JOW &.`w l $-1 ` 96 Approved: • PWW-0001.11175 (REV.11/78) DATE ............................................ By............................................................ • • Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM 15 Dec 95 John Bissell, Associate Planner Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOC. - GRADING In a discussion with Craig Campbell of Lovell Sauerland yesterday regarding the discrepency in grading quantities for the above subject, Craig explained the building had to be lowered to meet the height limit, and a road was added to the design since the original SEPA was submitted for grading. With that explaination, we do not have a problem with the quantity of soil to be removed. Our only concern would be shoring along the city right-of-way and the effect it will. have on erosion and undermining but with the shoring plan those concerns have been reduced. As far as the truck route is concerned, we will require the contractor to enter and exit from Dayton Street to SR 104. City of Edmonds 8 Engineering Division EDFINCTR.DOC Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM December 15, 1995 ADB-95-84 Plan Check 95-187 SEPA Note Book John Bissell, AICP, Associate Planner Planning Division Edmonds Financial Center: Change in proposed grading from 3700 c.y. to 9700 c.y. The Building Division received a fax on December 13 which stated that the grading proposed for this project is 9700 cubic yards. The original SEPA determination was based on a proposed 3700 cubic yards. Since the new proposed grading is significantly larger than the yards proposed in the SEPA determination, the Planning Staff must determine if the change requires a new SEPA Determination. Planning Staff has identified no concerns with the proposed additional grading. A memo was sent to the Engineering Division to determine Engineering Division Concerns. The Engineering Division responded with a memo stating no additional concerns. Therefore, the City has determined that the change to the proposal will not create additional impacts, and the existing SEPA documents can be used. No new SEPA determination is required. John Bissell cc. Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator A. Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector att. City of Edmonds cQ Planning Division C� J Date: To: From: Subject: BUILDING MEMORANDUM December 14, 1995 A. Lyle Christman, Engineering Inspector Engineering Division John Bissell, AICP, Associate Planner Planning Division Edmonds Financial Center: Change in proposed grading from 3700 c.y. to 9700 c.y. The Building Division received a fax on December 13 which stated that the grading proposed for this project is 9700 cubic yards. The original SEPA determination was based on a proposed 3700 cubic yards. Since the new proposed grading is significantly larger than the yards proposed in the SEPA determination, the Planning Staff must determine if the change requires a new SEPA Determination. Therefore, the Planning Staff requests comments from the Engineering Division regarding the possibility of new impacts that might be created by the additional grading. We are specifically concerned with the proposed truck route plan, and if any changes might be required, proposed changes in dumping locations, new problems with the cut, and new problems with shoring of the cut. Thank you for your attention to this matter. John Bissell cc. Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator i City of Edmonds czR Planning Division shMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS• To: Applicant From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Owner. ap Plan Check No: Address: 11 D 4'AIU6S -gfi Date: (+ After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met; 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M.WEEKENDSlHOLLDAYS —10:00 A.M.-6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Buildedowner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 1830.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 1830.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 1830) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGH TUNES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILIMG. (ECDC 19 30) ' 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewallc adjacent to the property. if an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to ddatd&w the c tetd of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14% Waiver granted to °/a (ECDC 18.80.060D) AM&0& Sl.r� /�go1 vcV p Tb lcJ % Ott lam. c z!L 13 N34 R. 10. Driveways must be paved from propergr fine to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIORTO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit fi+om the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. Then is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) 14. A bade water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole.. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer mainlines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC I&10) 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is requited. LIDN Fees paid: Yes No Charge (ECDC 18.10 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions. alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) , 18. A FINAL. ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIMON GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) � G MITtG�tIoP3 � a 4&I o • �4` ST E T FILE' � �, wMA V. !� �' � ??% % 4;VAe4i&f s,P p f.1� I�►�f�1r� �' V ! 11� r 12/ 12/95 17: 3e COhB901JI 1ErtLTF1 LA. TLE 206 775 2668 tJO. @: P05 19400 33rd Ave. W. Suite 200 Lovell-Sauerland Lynnwood Wa>"on 96W & ASSOGia eS, Inc. (20e)775-1501 Seattle, (206) 34040M EnolnNn/Sun�ron/Dleiui�rt/Do��lopes�Mt cotuunants November 9. 1995 File No. 95-3419 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ' AUTHORIZED FOR FOR RECORDING CI T Y OF EDMONDS HEWING BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT' i Existing Parcel A All portion of Government Lot 2, Section 23. Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., lying easterly of State Route 104 as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded February 11, 1971. under Auditor's File No. 2184033. southerly of lames Street and westerly of 2nd Street as shown on the plat of Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds. according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 43. records of Snohomish County, Washington. Existing Parcel B That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North. Range 3 East, W,M., described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Third and Dayton streets in the City of Edmonds; Thence west 338 feet to the point of beginning; thence north to the north Ilne of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter; thence west to the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter; thence South to the north margin of Dayton Street; thence east to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the cast 30 feet for road; and. EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2141566. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. New Parcel A That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the northwest cornet of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; thence west 338 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 1' 18'22' E, a distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88'41'22" W, a distance of 231.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR- 104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2141566, said margin being a curve to the left having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which Intersection point the center of said curve bears S 72'52'59" E; thence southerly along the arc of said curve to the left and conttuning a central angle of 9'27'11% an arc distance of 82.49 feet to a point 100 feet easterly, as measured radially to the L line, of Highway Engineers Station 20+00; thence S 23'25'27 W, a distance of 61.26 feet to a point opposite and 80 feet easterly of Highway Engineers Station 20+68.17 P.T.; thence S 1'09'15' W, 80 feet easterly and parallel of said L line, a distance of 106.83 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station:I +75; thence S 44'26'45" E, a distance of 28.10 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station 9+00 and 30 feet northerly, as measured at right angles to the centerline of Dayton Street; thence S 88'41 *22' E. along the northerly margin of Dayton Street, a distance of 249.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT the east 30 feet thereof for road. New Parcel B That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds, thence west 338 feet; thence N 1'18'22' E. a distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88'41'22" W, a distance of 30.00 feet, to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing N 88'41'22" W. a distance of 201.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR-104. as conveyed to the Stow of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2141566 and 2184033, said margin being a Exhibit 6 12/12/95, 17:28 COMM" :TH LAND TITLE 206 775 2668 : N0.822 95 12 1204 10 CITY OF EDMOND O RECORD OF1OT TINE AD USTMENT Q This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit " ") and described as follows, See Exhibit "8" have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec 20.75) File No. S-95-138 Conditions: Exhibit C Hold Harmless Agreement I / we verify that I / we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I / we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmond's shall have the right to declare that subdivisions void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of the Snohomish County Auditor. Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me Koty,(+ is - � k 0 to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that PC, signed the same as WS free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this e day of UCCMLff- 1995 _. AU7740R1ZED 7DMsC1YofEO D T A oia bhc in and for the State oo\twashington residing at c�1)u&1'1.Cuj1W Mac u tlfln ! 1OF 12/12i95 17'31 CUMUN EALTH Lfa• OLE 206 775 2668 NO. 8'.006 curve to the right having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears S 72'52'59" B; thence northerly along the arc of said curve to the right and consuming a antral angle of 13' 15'33 an arc distance of 115.71 feet to the point of tangency; thence N 30'22'34" E. along said easterly margin, a distance of 94.61 feet to the southerly margin of James Street; thence S 59'34'37" E, along said southerly margin, a distance of 185.49 feet to the westerly margin of 2nd Avenue S.; thence S 30'24'17" W. along said westerly margin, a distance of 104.57 feet; . thence S 1' 18'22" W. along said westerly margin, a distance of 7.78 feet to the True Point of Beginning. CITY OF EDMONDS : j N AN ENO • 1�?/:%2i95 17: 30 C0111'10?,#TH LAND TITLE - 206 775 2668 NO.822 904 AND DISTANCES ARE BASED �RTHIN RECORD OF SURVEY .- OLETON k ASSOC, INC. ,.OED IN VOLUME 43 OF �,4VEYS. PACE 155, RECORDS F SNOHOMISH COUNTY. ASHINGtON. A 0 EASEMENT OF RECORD (ISTS FOR THE SANITARY _WER LINE THAT CROSSES 4RCEL A. THE CITY OF �Q` )MONDS WOULD HAVE AN >SEMENT BY PERSCRIPTIVE GHT. THE CITY AGREES . iAT UPON ABANDONE- ZNT OR RELOCATION 1pp, THE SEWER LINE iE CITYS PERSCRIPIIVE CHT SHALL TERMINATE v 6 = 2913*19" R e 600.00' yy L - 306.01' N.E.S. 20+00 too' �. h b H.E.S. 20+88.17 80' o uc N r n P � 21+75 sue. b ,H.E.S. 80' H.E-wUtffAt CORDING CITY OF EDMONDS. jslST ADDIT1*0N 7o EDMONDS / oL 15, P0. 48) OCK 2 2 'tip Js it �1 FS v i oia 7�S `S% ' A 30.077 S.F.(NEW) J0' 4N 139 S'33' I 4iJp. R - 500.00' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ^ `` L o 115.71' SANITARY SEWER LINE (SEE NOTE) EXISTING LOT LINE N 89'04'08" W 200_04' N �Z �$9 W~ G - 09'27'11" R d 500.00' L a 82.49' W 201.24' NEW LOT LINE 10 ao rf 13 `° a 60.086 S.F.(NEW) 219.74' li N 88'41'22" W M 349.74' DAYTON STREET b Exhibit A ! I = / 30' 30' i I I t .f 1n I I � i I I l I vi wW I I w I 041 I Z 04 I ± � I 1h I I ..I I f I 30' 30' L 12/12/95 17:29 COMMON ILTH LAND TITLE -+ 206 775 2668 NO.822 1903 File Number S-95-118 ice] HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Owner, and all persons having any present or subsequent ownership interest in these lands, and the successors and assigns of owners or other parties having any said interest, hereby agree that the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless in all respects from any and all claims for damages for injunctive relief which may be occasioned now or in the future to adjacent land or improvements by reason of the construction, operation and maintenance of the drainage system and hereby waive and release the City of Edmonds from any and all claims for damages, excluding damage caused solely by an act or omission of said City and injunctive relief which the owners, or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now or in the future by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of said drainage system. AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONDS OF 4� l- LtmLand and Construction Management, L.L.C. November 28, 1995 City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Division Gordon Hyde Engineering Coordinator 250 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Gordy, C] RVrE1VF_0 NOV 2 9 1995 ENGINEERsN::4 Please find attached, the cost breakdown of the site work for the proposed facility to be constructed a 110 James Street. Please review these costs for -setting our bond amount at the above mentioned project. These cost will cover all of the site work not pertaining to the building itself. Thank your for your efforts. We are targeting December 13th - 15th to hopefully get our permit issued for this project. We all know that nothing is concrete but with this in mind your utmost attention would be appreciated. //J If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 771-9118. LLC ST,EET FILE P.O. Box 100 • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • 206 771-9118 • FAX 206 774-1132 �i 11/28/95 EFCBOND.XLS 2:31 PM d `2.(4 �L-C.i•-:I_and"and Cbnstniction ManagemeiltjLLC-",..,. .��e^vaH'. 't. s-+`". r.�°. , x • !„t,f. i ? j. J UTILITIESzAND;SITE-DEVELOPMENTc..,,' GENERAL DELIVERY - P.O. Box 100 - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE 771.9118 ¢�74EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOC' P rEFC FACILIq?dY ", ��,, 421 Sth Avenue North, Suitea123�t,.�-� �, � �.�Locdirori 110;:1AME$ ST ` � � �'4® {�.,.a�`-�,.�' i�FT-k-`��; � .7 n.,"', §.•�C� .�� , '> rEdmonds';;iNA98o20"�a v:ax� ` �.;�'b�.�Ar� x r¢.`�2E Nov- �$95.. •:r: 6"�-'.i: - ,__?;ACREA E5' 0"69 "yF;'& ��i�.,;"€re�'��.�:pp"��yceay;.;�;; .'n. CURRENTrZONING BC-";�:'."�"�•'�s"��•m�'" ;. !,€:l �1� i��.. >� S` 1'j�j' 3 ^l� 4 � r,•' a yr^mW6 i• ^:lri..�' ��'' .'4d '.l' ,'�i..' �t'"Rif"er".f:•. ,.f 0 DS '" } '{.✓-44D 1�,:. 7 __Jy4`'. ^ ,, =`bp, �� dOP--.6 p1 �' , 3'&�d.° &rvy r�4.t', �d'.t «<y'�.; `.i 'a�i";c. t ^✓'..-.-,..`... ^`w•§y, s - ,v c t=� a i °ti yp u.t''" r. .'ai'.-FIREDIS7RICT'.CITY.OF EDMOIDS._.. �y+,..• ;^ 5 t, ITEM f`'CODE�'.<DESCRIPTI,,OgN:•: ;�t�� `'�; ,'. �-`�f" 1 ROUGH GRADING A STRIP BLDG. / PARKING B MASS EXCAVATION C CUTS AND FILLS 2 CLEARING AND DEMO A CLEAR/GRUB/REMOVE B DEMO CONC. / ASPHALT 3 EROSION CONTROL A SILT FENCE B CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C TEMP. SEDIMENT POND D TEMP. DRAINAGE SWALE E CHECK DAMS 4 SANITARY SEWER A 6" P.V.C. B 18" P.V.C. SEWER MAIN C 24" P.V.C. SEWER MAIN D INSIDE DROP 12" E MANHOLE 54" F CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE G DEMO EXISTING PIPE H STREET RESTORATION 5 STORM SEWER A TYPE 1 CATCH BASINS B 54" MANHOLE C 54" MANHOLE W/RESTRICTOR MYx�"':�a�.r�ie°,:?UNI,T'�� ..t,=_'�.Y-�, •i' �, �. .. "i., 4 i tiglr, y;.- _c,e--: xsb . .., ,�,.ye:.'�','. .ur,:°,.°.r.:: c. �t ,�, att;.an.:. JNIT..r 2,100.00 CY 10.15 21,315.00 1,747.83 $23.062.83 600.00 CY 10.15 6,090.00 499.38 $6,589.38 -1 500 1,070.00 CY 2.25 2,407.50 197.42 $2,604.92 SetSD 1.00 LF 2,475.00 2,475.00 202.95 $2,677.95 30 1.00 LF 11,750.00 11,750.00 963.50 $12,713.50 (4-4i;D 589.00 LF ,3.45 2,032.05 166.63 $2,198.68 ADD 2.00 LF /500=3 d5- 3oO01"0- 2e�=�fr5�- 37L4=�f�-47 A's✓1AD 1.00 LF 00=:3-45 /ll0'3.45 e-!V28 106tf $3.73 12S 195.00 LF 3.45 672.75 55.17 $727.92 $VS 2.00 LF 300--3.45 600' .90 4--)t 0.57 60�$7.47 75D 40.00 L.F. 28.00 1,120.00 91.84 1,211.84 1-5'75 -'62-N?54,6'-3rzaa.00 IS¢ 42-0 . /D3s2 *s4-dt II175 -442-ee I_. 58.00 6,496.00 532.67 $7,028.67 FOOD 1.00 . EACH 990.00 990.00 81.18 ;1,071.18 17-2-5 1.00 EACH 74V0 3;26060-ZpvO 3,250.00 164''G6 59214��830� 1.00 EACH 1,740.00 1,740.00 142.68 $1,882.68 Z�S� 1.00 LS 1,275.00 1,275.00 104.55 $1,379.55 IS"1S 1.00 LS 13,975.00 13,975.00 $13,975.00 15$ 7s 3.00 EACH 750.00 2,250.00 184.50 $2,434.50 4-11 1.00 EACH 2,340.00 2,340.00 191.88 $2,531.88 287S 1.00 EACH 3,320.00 3,320.00 272.24 $3,592.24 A,p'S Page 1 220'j0� i02� 11 /28/95 0 • D CONSTRUCT SILT POND E 12" N-12 STORM PIPE F 6" P.V.C. DRAIN G 8" P.V.C. DRAIN 1 60" MANHOLE J 8" N-12 STORM PIPE K 48" MANHOLE 0 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE P TIDE GATES Q 2" P.V.C. FORCE MAIN R 36" N-12 DETENTION PIPE S 48" DETENTION PIPE T STREET RESTORATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL U FLUSH SYSTEM WATER MAIN A CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" GATE VALVE B 4" DUCTILE IRON C RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY D 4" GATE VALVE E STREET RESTORATION F MISC. FITTINGS G FLUSH/TEST H TRAFFIC CONTROL (SEE STREET RESTORATION) 1 1" SERVICE TAP J 2 " SERVICE TAP ROAD CONSTRUCTION A ONSITE FINAL ASPHALT ON ATB B PIT RUN BASE C ASPHALT RAMP D 18" VERTICAL CURB E 8" BARRIER CURB F PARKING STRIPPING G STENCILS H 'GUARD POSTS I CROSSWALK STENCILS AND STOP BAR J SIGNAGE K 18" VERTICAL CURB (ROW) L FINAL ASPHALT ON ATB RIGHT OF WAY M COMPACTION TEST N PRECAST WHEEL STOPS 0 T CONCRETE SIDEWALK (ROW) P STREET CLEANING Q TRAFFIC CONTROL R HANDICAP RAMPS (HIGH TRAFFIC TRANS.) EFCBOND.XLS 2:31 PM 1.00 LS 500.00 500.00 41.00 $541.00 154.00 L.F. 17.00 2,618.00 $2,618.00 V1176, 48.00 L.F. 12.00 576.00 47.23 $623.23 700 25.00 L.F. 14.00 350.00 28.70 $378.70 ¢ LS 1.00 EACH 2,500.00 2,500.00 205.00 $2,705.00 3075 369.00 EACH 15.00 5,535.00 453.87 $5,988.87 (0600 3.00 EACH 2,035.00 6,105.00 500.61 $6,605.61 7500 1.00 EACH 2,240.00 2,240.00 $2,240.00 25'�C> 2.00 EACH 365.00 730.00 59.86 $789.86 c(v 0 45.00 L.F. 14.00 630.00 51.66 $681.66 ',7S 6.00 L.F. 75.00 450.00 36.90 $486.90 50 117.00 L.F. 95.00 11,115.00 911.43 $12,026.43 t3601< 1.00 LS 4750.00 4,750.00 $4,750.00 5 A-00 1.00 LS 2500 2,500.00 205.00 $2,705.00 3015 1.00 EACH 890.00 890.00 72.98 $962.98 ( 00 40.00 L.F. 16.00 640.00 52.48 $692.48 i It; 1.00 EACH 1,230.00 1,230.00 100.86 $1,330.86 IS2i� 1.00 L.F. 350.00 350.00 28.70 $378.70 ¢1,1,' 1.00 LS 3,245.00 3,245.00 $3,245.00 3100 1.00 LS 750.00 750.00 61.50 $811.50 `(Z<- 1.00 LS 1,500.00 1,500.00 123.00 $1,623.00 1QS-D 1.00 EACH 325.00 325.00 26.65 $351.65 A -OD 1.00 EACH 525.00 525.00 43.05 $568.05 (.57D 935.17 S.Y. 11.50 10,754.46 881.87 $11,636.32 132.25 900.00 TON 7.25 6,525.00 535.05 $7,060.05 302- 1.00 EACH 225.00 225.00 18.45 $243.45 275 161.00 L.F. 7.75 1,247.75 102.32 $1,350.07 (rj- Z,5- 367.00 L.F. 6.50 2,385.50 195.61 $2,581.11 Z )2.s 544.00 LF 0.35 190.40 15.61 $206.01 7-Z.5- 4.00 EACH 2O.00 80.00 $80.00 too 3.00 EACH 90.00 270.00 $270.00 Sob 2.00 EACH 2O0.00 400.00 $400.00 4-SD 1.00 LS 634.00 634.00 $634.00 72.5 255.00 L.F. 7.75 1,976.25 $1,976.25 7-151> 135.00 SY 11.50 1,552.50 $1,552.50 076 1.00 LS 1,500.00 1,500.00 $1,500.00 1700 9.00 EACH 25.00 225.00 18.45 $243.45 2-1 S 2,387.00 L.F. 1.45 3,461.15 $3,461.15 39Z5 1.00 LS 1,500.00 1,500.00 $1,500.00 17 00 1.00 LS 500.00 500.00 $500.00 575 2.00 EACH 1,500.00 3,000.00 $3,000.00 3400 Paget C i i 11/28/95 EFCBOND.XLS 2:31 PM ITC ■� �CODEe ',DESCRIPTION rt� r«i; °g ; 'a: ;, °°P " G?l1ANT17Y" b r 41 "(l 'IT' ty s; PRICE.' -SUBTOTAL ar }'; VLgS. ,s OTiiL G�1!. ":t. �'t2�Cx::c.•<'d�_�i.. .. 'S��:'..��k".i::c;."1.�_.•;..a ['..�.� 8 MISCELLANEOUS A LANDSCAPING 3,684.00 SF 1.71 6,299.64 516.57 16,016.21—, r�^ B IRRIGATION 3,684.00 SF 1.85 6,815.40 558.86 $7-,W4-26-- N �{ C DUMPSTERS 1.00 EACH 1,200.00 1,200.00 98.40 $:6298-46-1 TOTAL COST $188,055.60 $12,001.00 $200,056.60 < YJZ2D1voo 1= Page 3 �Vqo �q(' • 19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 ® ■mu Lovell-Sauerland Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (206) 775.1591 . ®� ® ■ & Associates, Inc. Seattle: (206) 340-0830 Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants FAX: (206) 672-7998 RF'CF1VSD Nove beLSA No, 2995 Mr. Gordy Hyde K,0V 17 1`395 City of Edmonds PERMIT COUNTER Engineering Department 250 5th Ave Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Proposed Edmonds Financial Center at 2nd and James Street; request for deviation from City road standards Dear Gordy, As discussed last Thursday, we are requesting a deviation from the City's roadway standards. At two locations on the site, we have found it necessary to exceed the standard 12 percent grade in order to keep the building within the height limitations. We have found that both locations require 15 percent slopes for very short distances. Most of the proposed driving surface within the development will have slopes substantially less than 12 percent. However, the one-way ramp from James Street down into the property, and the one-way ramp exiting the parking garage on the west side of the building need the steeper slope. The only other way make up the elevation difference between James Street and the floor of the parking garage is to redesign the site circulation, which I have been told involves major structural changes to the building. The City of Edmonds Community Development Code, section 18.80.070 states that street slopes shall not exceed 12 percent unless authorized by the Public Works Director. On behalf our client I request authorization for the roadway to be constructed at the design grade of 15 percent. This proposal is consistent with common engineering practice and does not create any extraordinary hazard or present any safety or health problems. Other mitigating factors include the fact that the roadway is technically a driveway, and driveways are allowed to be built up to 14 percent without special permission. Also, it is intended for one-way traffic, and there is no requirement for emergency vehicle access. If this request is denied, we ask that the denial be in written form giving reasons as required in the Edmonds Code. Please let us know if you require further information to reach your decision. Sincerely, Craig Campbell, P.E. APPZ006D 'AL4V� a,sh_,M ® gm r a amr — -- � w/O . Ymry w.n s mrw wrsri uiww+.wwr rtY ...s.rvvrtllw0 oani w arry .. � ...s Nti t Y.RI .M6 PMIVWXta1A .cwe w r trw< Ysrw. a �wr 1f •wt • M arR�ll.Yi �( imCi%,Ormlvr,Lj .a..w�.. • r tw p11b6t�w f ,p YtN ane m,n ... a im.ceww.ron _ rro stet Ne ro po.[ a M �� Ya.It V. C1'uJ,MWI Yam errta m.r a,omm mt /11�OOIT �,IDf, . ra .tau ~i.IwwMw,�.wtlw _ ir.l.ww YwY.rw, ••• .�Ntt..w..1t.wY. fYa MrOOI, PARK M IO Y O *Y 1►t �.i�wwjj �o wit�twt s wr liiY pvA++t'•/1..t. 67 M/eO,O CO,.rO N ^ PHASE 2 DRAINAGE AND SITE PLAN FOR . 1 EDMONDS RNANCIAL CENTER ASSOC. IN S.E. 1 4 OF SECTION 23. T.27 N.. R.3 E..W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON 6 cepswrY� en w w roe LNR _ rpY als wa tw.L1M n.Y.O..w1� Yw �.YW%/. �Spww � l Owv s w w0.a4. i 16I I Ya N (pAV�$rOrf�Od t �r00i�{H DLO. ptiQi w Wt� Y.ts w 1.ni �� pr� �w� at auo 95-3383 Gl WiLLI L yr 0 Approve Claim C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #18985 THROUGH #21009 FOR THE WEEK OF Warrants OCTOBER 27,1997 IN THE AMOUNT OF $299,245.60 out Fall Repair D. COUNCIL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS ($69,100) TO THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT ✓ Project PLANT OUT FALL REPAIR PROJECT Alliance / for Econ. E. AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL POWER FOR EDMONDS Dev. Kiosk ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT KIOSK 2a. PRESENTATION BY ASCENT 21 ASCENT 2' Sue Gould, Co -Chair of Ascent 21, was present to introduce the organization to the Council. She introduced the other co-chairs of this group as follows: Brian Benzel, Allan Darr, Bob Drewel, and Tom Gaffney. She explained the purpose of the organization is to improve the ability of the County and communities to build and maintain critical infrastructures to support the quality of life within the County and the communities. She introduced Charlie Earl, who will make a brief presentation as to what this organization's efforts involve. Charlie Earl said the purpose of tonight's presentation is to provide information and receive feedback from the Council and to relate the next steps to anticipate in the coming weeks. He provided overhead transparencies throughout his presentation. He noted that there has been a tremendous population growth within the county over the last decade. Another 125,000 people are expected between the years 1995 and 2005. This is reflected in the employment information, as well. There has been a substantial growth in jobs and this trend is expected to continue. Mr. Earl displayed a chart showing the funding which had been set aside for road maintenance and construction. It includes information regarding the vehicle miles traveled each year. The difference between these two items reflects the sense that there is currently overcrowding on the roadways. The purpose of ASCENT 21 is to figure out ways to assist the local governments in building and maintaining critical infrastructures to meet the needs of the local communities and the County. The group's name, ASCENT 21, stands for Addressing Snohomish County's Environment Now & Tomorrow. This group's task involves the formation of public/private partnerships and improving the community's ability to build and maintain critical infrastructure (funding for roads, parks, stormwater facilities, water/sewer systems, educational facilities, criminal justice facilities and linkages with other community planning efforts). It is critical that they consider issues such as quality of life, safety, economic viability and environmental health. Mr. Earl explained that this is a three-phase effort. The first phase was completed last spring and involved the gathering of data to determine if this type of project would be feasible. Once it was determined to be feasible, they were ready to move to the second phase, which is the organization of the program. Their first effort will be the planning process to determine what projects could be formed and under what time frame they should operate. They are also working to form a coalition to reach out to a much larger decision making body. This is the purpose of tonight's presentation. Once phase 2 is accepted by the jurisdictions, they will move to phase 3, which will involve implementation of the program through voter campaigns, lobbying, and the formation of partnerships. Mr. Earl informed the Council that Berk & Associates, Inc. from Seattle conducted the feasibility study. The feasibility study indicates that the infrastructure needs are estimated at $1.7 billion for 1,200 projects from 53 jurisdictions. There are committed funds for these projects totaling $700 million. This leaves approximately $1 billion of unfunded needs. He reviewed both the funded projects and the unfunded projects by type of infrastructure with the use of a transparency overhead. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes -2 — November 3, 1997 Change to Agenda Approve Minutes EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES NOVEMBER 3, 1997 The Edmonds City Council Meeting was called to order at 7.00 p.m. by Mayor Barbara Fahey in the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main Street, followed by the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Barbara Fahey, Mayor Dave Earling, Council President Dick Van Hollebeke, Councilmember Roger L. Myers, Councilmember Jim White, Councilmember Gary Haakenson, Councilmember Thomas A. Miller, Councilmember ABSENT John Nordquist, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Andy Streit, Student Representative APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Paul Mar, Community Services Director Art Housler, Administrative Services Director Jim Walker, City Engineer Frances Chapin, Cultural Program Coordinator Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor Sandy Chase, City Clerk Karin Noyes, Recorder R IVF-D NOV 211997 ENGINEERING Council President Earling asked that Item 8 be moved to Item 2a and that item 7 be moved to Item 3a to enable these two items to be brought forward more quickly than anticipated. MOTION BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING, SECONDED BY COUNCILMMMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE, TO MOVE ITEM 8 TO ITEM 2a AND ITEM 7 TO ITEM 3a. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MYERS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY COUNCILIVIEMBER MYERS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 29,1997 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 3, 1997 Fe.o ter- a4e ---- T • STREET USE PERMIT APPLICATION �--1 L--.A 0 NAME OF APPLICANT: EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOCIATES,LLC NAME OF BUSINESS: EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 123 EDMONDS WA 98020 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: MART' SPADAFORA 771-9118 LCM,LLC P.O.BOX 100 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE: 110 JAMES STREET, EDMONDS Describe the public place or portion of public space to be utilized: TIEF OF THE PTIRT.TC RTGHT OF WAY BEHIND THE CTTY ETDEWATR ON THE SOUTH STDF OF JAMEq STRFFT FAST OF 2ND AVENUE, Specify the type of use desired rn ow.RTTANC; THF. PT.ANTF.R�pm< AgSFMRT.TF4 INTO TRF CITY RIGHT OF WAY. Specify the length of time for use: IXJOL�� l%E NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature and that no vested right is granted. INDEMNITY.- The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited io the defense or any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the application understands that the City shall be provided a Certificate oflnsurance to indemnity and hold harmless the City of Edmonds from all claims and/or property damage, and naming the City of Edmonds as an additional insured. CODE APPLICATION.• By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had the opportunity to read Chapter 18 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth in full and this application and permits therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter. / / / I NW//ffA .��.A� 'I,4 I4S- FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOCIATES,LLC STRUSEH0.DOCJLG/2-95 I wa SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL FROM ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS i When applicable, if the street use proposal directly impacts any adjacent business or private property owner the applicant must obtain written approval from the affected parties. This requirement is evaluated by City Staff after the initial submittal of the application. Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE --FOR CITY USE ONLY Planning Division Review: ADB#�-� Approved By Date t2 18 9s Public Works Review: Approved By / IZ4- Date Fire Department Review: Approved By C�ate� Police Department Review: Approved By to Permit Coordinator Review: Engineering Division Review: Bond Required - Amount $ Approved By Dated y Remarks or Comments: PERMIT DATE OF ISSUANCE -7 RELEASED BYxj"/-�RECEIPT #a2oCn 9? • i STRUSEHO.DOOLG/2-95 j 2 I I I I i I I I 11 ' ------- r� IT ILA Ul- _ I A As SEE STA4R - 5rrr. +A,.O. 4TS 1 r • • i FSt. 189" CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR May 19, 1997 Al �A I Co Edmonds Financial Center '11 00 110 James St. Suite 100 Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: Street Use Renewal Fee Permit ##95-22 As required by City Ordinance ##2972, Street Use permit renewal fees are now collected every three years instead of yearly. The first effective billing date was 1/1/96 however, due to staff shortages, the City was unable to send out this billing for the period 1/96 to 1/99. Please remit renewal fees in the amount of $25.00 to the City of Edmonds, c/o Building Division, Permit Specialist, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020 within 15 days date of this letter. If this permit is no longer applicable i.e., you no longer utilize that portion of the City right-of-way granted under the street use permit; please notify the Building Division in writing so that we may cancel the permit. As permit holder it is your responsibility to inspect the permitted use for safety hazards on a yearly basis. As a reminder your Certificate of Insurance will expire on 11/7/97. Please continue to send us updated renewal certificates. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 771-0220. Thank you, Vivienne Myers Permit Specialist Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 0 fn c.18913 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant January 12, 1998 Edmonds Financial Center 110 James Street, Suite 100 Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Street Use Permit @ 110 James Street The City has been notified that the Insurance Policy for the Street Use Permit at the • subject property is expired. Because a valid Certificate of Insurance is required for every street use permit per the Edmonds Community Development Code 18.70.030, the permit at the subject property is now invalid. We consider this matter to be of extreme importance. Therefore, you must immediately provide a valid certificate of insurance or you must remove the permitted use of planters, a deck, the concrete entry, stairs and railings in the city right-of-way by January 20, 1998. Failure to take action to resolve the matter shall result in dispatch of the City crew to remove the above described items. • Thank you, Vivienne Myers Permit Specialist cc: Building Official: Permit Coordinator Erika K. Klein Construction Legal Consultant e Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan TNO Q0 00 C111 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5 th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 JUL 2 9g9 EDUONDS 199906281467 06/28 00/1999 3 04:13 PM Snohomish P.0 RECORDED County DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Reference #: Grantor(s): (1)' 1,4f- (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec Z-3 Twn Z? Rng -3 Qtr � OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (I Z;Z - 03 -1-059-=7 (2) _assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned WHEREAS, E F C A, L L C ' are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address:' 110 James S t . , Edmonds, WA Legal Description: See . Attached_ Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s): A;ge O F RECORDING t of dmonds B Date P�_ of Declaration of Restrictive Covenant FVHEREAS, EFCA , L L C are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address: 110 James St Edmonds , WA Legal Description: (See Attached, Exhibit A) Tax Account Parcel Number:. 2 3 2 7- 0 3 -1- 0 5 9- 0 0 0 7 {VHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed or the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than 10 _ units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. DATED this day of / 19 / EFCA LLC `T Grant;b� Grant�b t S m i t h STATE OF WASHINGTON) Managing Member ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me Robert Smith and to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed within the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under,,., yidardf.. this (Jof 6of. 19 Notary Public n and for t ie State of Washington, resi�ding� a �0 62 81. 4 6 ` 46111: Legal Description That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; thence west 338 feet; thence N 1"18'22" E, a distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88°41'22" W, a distance of 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing N 88°41'22" W, a distance of 201.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR-104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No's. 2141566 and 2184033, said margin being a curve to the right having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears S 72°52'59" E; thence northerly along the arc of said curve to the right and consuming a central angle of 13°15'33", an arc distance of 115.71 feet to the point of tangency; thence N 30°22'34" E, along said easterly margin, a distance of 94.61 feet to the southerly margin of James Street; thence S 59°34'37" E, along said southerly margin, a distance of 185.49 feet to the westerly margin of 2nd Avenue S; thence S 30°24' 17" W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 104.57 feet; thence S 1°18'22" W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 7.78 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 99906c'46" • Item #: r°= : EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Memo Originator: James C. Walker For Action: X For Information: Subject: AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL POWER FOR EDMONDS ALLIANCE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT KIOSK Agenda Time: Agenda Date: Exhibits Attached: Consent November 3, 1997 1. Letter requesting assistance Clearances: Department/Initials Admin Svcs/Finance City Attorney City Clerk Court Personnel Fire Police Reviewed by Council Committee: Community Svcs Engineering Parks & Rec Planning Public Works Treatment Plant City Council Mayor Finance Community Services Public Safety Approved for Consent Agenda: Recommend Review by Full Council: Expenditure Amount Appropriation Required: $ 0 Budgeted: $0 Required: $ 0 Funding Source: N/A I Previous Council Action: None I Narrative: The City received a request to allow use of a City owned electrical system to provide power for the kiosk being proposed near the ferry holding lanes. The costs to extend a new underground system from the nearest available PUD source are high. The power use proposed for the kiosk is minimal. Staff recommends that the City allow connection to our existing line and provide power for its operation as part of our contribution to the Alliance. Recommended Action: Council authorize staff to supply power for the operation of the Alliance kiosk. Council Action: i -SORT OF E D M 0 N D S ' . 1991 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington 98020-7214 �� ' (425) 774-0549 �thti;�� ;=i:,Son (425) 774-7837 FAX September 8, 1997 Paul Mar, Director"'" City of Edmonds 121 5"' Ave. N. ``' Edmonds W. 0 �aL�t� '%q_' KS DEP Dear Mr. The Port is assisting the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development in the construction of an information Kiosk at the comer of Sunset and James streets on property owned by Albert Dykes. The Kiosk will be equipped with phone and power. The closest phone service is located on the utility pole in the northwest corner of the property. The closest 110V power is an additional 235 feet away and would require a variance to run an overhead wire between those two poles. This is an expensive option for several technical reasons. My staff contacted Noel Miller about running power under James Street and connecting with the lighting in the City's parking lot. As it turns out, there is a 110V line separate from the lighting circuit at the southern edge of that lot. It was apparently installed to run an automated ticket machine sometime in the past. We would like to connect to that circuit to power the lighting system on the Kiosk structure. As designed, the power requirements would not exceed 5 kilowatt hours per month. The wiring under James Street will involve approximately 200 feet of underground conduit. All costs associated with the utilities infrastructure will be the responsibility the Port. The connection on the north side of James Street would be made in the existing aboveground box. The information Kiosk Project is sponsored by a grant from the Snohomish County Department of Planning and Development Services and is intended to benefit the business community in the City of Edmonds. The Port is financing and managing the construction. GTE is supplying the phone equipment and installation. The landowner is donating the use of his property. Once completed, the Kiosk will be operated as a community service by the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development. The connection to the City owned lighting circuit is the most practical and cost effective, technical approach. The Port would like the City to supply power required to run two - 60 watt light fixtures on the Kiosk structure. Please contact Don Olmsted with any questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, enclosure: site plan 9 EXHIBIT 1 — PAGE 1 p ORT OF Donald W. Olmsted E D M 0 N D S Planning & Permit Coordinator Voice Mail: 248 336 Admiral Way - Edmonds, WA 98020 - Office: (425) 774.0549 Fax: (425) 774-7837 • Marine Services: (425) 775-4588 Marine Services Fax: (425) 670-0583 ' I- 190 Sunset Ave. S. h TRANSFORNIE11130Y UTILITI1 POLE --------_:� ;CITY a ;PARKIN LOT E �?� i ' '�• 1. ' I . . 0. L1GH' o • Geldies POLE Restaurant j co s8eo� IElge rate EX IN( iiov rE PHONE y`\\��\\\\�. �� I PROPOSED KIOSK SITE v Q� ��SQJ�Sti PROPOSED 5 Phone line + if EDMONDS ALLIANCE, FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZllTF'ORMl°s.TZON EKZ06lZ11 PROJECT WITII FUNDING FROM SNOI-IOMISH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PORT OF EDMONDS [] .I IOV Power 0 LCMLand and Construction Management, L.L.C. March 27, 1997 City of Edmonds Community Services Department Engineering Department Jamal Mahmoud, PE, Engineering Inspector 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Jamal, r..rr e%sr^; 3 1 1997 LNOINEERING Thank you for your letter dated March 21, 1997 regarding the sidewalk reconstruction at 110 James Street. We would like to address the following items noted in your letter as follows: 1. Response ........ We will not be installing any steps on the sidewalk. There will however be steps constructed in the Public Right of Way which have already been covered under the City of Edmonds Street Use permit issued December 2, 1996. 2. Response........ We will schedule a meeting with you to inspect the sidewalk forms prior to pouring concrete. 3. Response ........ We shall continue to apply all City codes and specifications to the proposed reconstruction such as joint spacing, concrete strength, mix, finish, etc. If you have any other concerns please feel free to call me regarding these issues. We anticipate to reconstruct this sidewalk during the week of March 31, 1997. Sincerely, Land andSotruction Management, LLC ms/ms cc: Tom Blaikie, superintendent Edmonds Financial Center Associates, LLC P.O. Box 100 • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • 206 771-9118 • FAX 206 774-1132 It)C. 1890 March 21, 1997 • CITY OF EDMONDS 0 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 '• FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR M, J--J 3121 /? 7 Marty Spadafora J —co M Edmonds Financial Center Associates 121 - 5th Ave. N., Suite 123 Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Sidewalk Reconstruction at 110 James Street. Dear Marty, The Engineering Division has completed the review of your proposal regarding the sidewalk reconstruction at 110 James Street. Please note the following comments: 1) No steps are allowed on the sidewalk or on the City right-of-way. 2) Engineering inspection is required to inspect the sidewalk forms. Please mark the forms prior to inspection. 3) All City codes and specifications should apply, such as joint spacing, concrete strength, etc. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me at 771-0220, extension 328. Sincerely, Jamairmahmoud, PE Engineering Inspector JM/sf c: Permit Coordinator Wal er 6-VamaRpro-sift • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • OZOL 83IdO03131 X083X L „,V9 , 00 : 0 -1b'101 L VG.0 INdL•L:OL L6-9Z—£ 8S£ZLLLR L 1N3WWOO 330Vd# I NOIiv8n0 3WI1 i8ViS '0 •I NOIldIS 310W38 ON L # 1Nnoo ** 1N3S SVM 180d38 N0 I SS I WSNVH1 CI 1 Y OF a1::)MC)NLJS BAi46Al3.A FAHEY MAYOFl 260 BTH AV3N4M NORTH - HOMON 09, VMR 00024 - (140) 771-0110 RAX 1200ti 77-0121 0C.4"MUMMN, BERVices oEPARTMENT Public Worley - Planning • Porky awd Recreation a Er,alnaaring 'r�r. T89� • Match 21, 1j997 Marty Spact: fora Edmonds Pinancial Center As3ocsatos 121 - Sth Awe. W., Suita 123 Edmonds, W.A. 98020 1^v�abject: sidewalk Recorastr•, actioa at I10 James Street_ Dear Marty; "rhe Engineering Division has ccmplatad this reviejw of your proposal regarding the sidewalk r®constructtlon at I 10 James Street. Please, note the following comments: 1) No steps are allowed on the sidewalk or on the City right-of-way. 2) ervolnee,ring Inspection Is required to inspect the sidewalk forms. FP1c3zase mark the forms prior to lnspactlon. 3) ^11 Olty codes and spectficntions should apply, such as joint spacing, concrete strength, etc. If there ara any questionsa, please feel free to contact men at 771-0220, extension 328. Sincerely, .TamaTMalbmozad, PE � ;C/,(�' _ Englaearitag, Insgt.ector _ JM/af c: Perrinit Coordinator � lncc�rpo rdtetl August 11, 1890 e Starer Cities Internatir,rtal — "ekinan, Japan 03/26/1997 11:23 2067784530 • fhc.18C)D March 21, 1997 DEWAR MEEKS & EKREM PAGE 01 Jam, T r /� C C 1�t T-� AIR 2 t3 4997 a Y O EDMONDS ��?��;��BAABARA FMa o 2So s rH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 * (2061771.0220 • FAX (206) 771.0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT PUbil, Worka a Planning • Parks and Ratreation • Enginearing Malty Spadafora Edmonds Financial Caen Associates 121 - 5th Ave. N.. Svite 12 Edmonds, WA 98020 Sidewalk ':ieconstructio>n at 110 James Street. 'Dear Marty, The Engineering Division has completed the review of your proposal regarding the sidewalk reconstrulion at 110 James Street. Please note. the following comments: 1) No steps aria allowed on the sidewalk or an the City right-of-way. 2) Engineering inspection is required tc inspect the sidewalk forms. Please mark the forms prior to inspection. 3) All City codes and specifications should apply, such as joint spacing, concrete strength, etc;. If there are any quostio Wsf c: Permit Coordinator rA..u=.11PM•3i& ns, Please feel free to contact me at 771-0220, extension 328. Sincerely, Jamsf'leahmoud, F E at Engineering Inspector �4j_,Vl zn' =_zl�_ a Incorporated August 11, 7890 a Sister Cities International -- Hekinan, Japan 0 9 MEMORANDUM 19 1997 -W MAR Date: March 19, 1997 To: Jim Walker and Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud '7/lt Subject: Sidewalk Reconstruction at 110-James Street Please review the attached proposal by LCM regarding reconstruction of the sidewalk at James Street and 2nd Avenue. I met with Tom Blaikie, Superintendent, March 17, 1997 and discussed a possible solution. After reviewing the attached proposal, I feel comforta - it a ra and the look of the new sidewalk. Please submit your comments to me Friday, March 24, 1997. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DMSION PROPOSAL.DOC . • LCMLand and Construction Management, LLC. • City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Jamal Mahmoud Re: Sidewalk Reconstruction Dear Jamal, March 18, 1997 I would like to propose the following solutions for the sidewalk slopes at the Edmonds Financial Center project, located at the corner of 2nd and James. 1) Demolish sidewalk on 2nd and James as noted on attached sketch. 2) Revise sidewalk profile to reflect a .005 slope from the backside of sidewalk to the existing curb,-m yett mgoeswd.3 i4�q 3) Revise 2nd Ave. entry stairs to have a sloped top step from 7" to 2 5/8" +/- (rise) which will match the new sidewalk profile. See 2nd Ave. section view. 4) Rework 2nd Ave. handrail base to reflect new sloped step. 5) Revise James St. sidewalk profile as noted on attached sketch. The new sidewalk would parallel the existing James St. entry stairs and would create a sloped step from 7" to 0". This step would run along the existing back of the sidewalk allowing pedestrians to distinguish between the new sloped step and the existing stairway. 6) No change to James St. stairs or handrails 7) No change to handicap ramp location; Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or are in need of additional information. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Land and.. construction Management, LLC c Toy Blaikie Superintendent l P.O. Box 100 Edmonds, Washington 98020 206 771-9118 FAX 206 774-1132 % VA 0 (ryR) r u MEMORANDUM Date: March 19, 1997 To: Jim Walker and Gordy Hyde From: Jamal Mahmoud/✓� Subject: Sidewalk Reconstruction at 110-James Street Please review the attached proposal by LCM regarding reconstruction of the sidewalk at James Street and 2nd Avenue. I met with Tom Blaikie, Superintendent, March 17, 1997 and discussed a possible solution. After reviewing the attached proposal, I feel comfortable with the drainage and the look of the new sidewalk. Please submit your comments to me by Friday, March 24, 1997. CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION PROPOSAL.DOC LCMLand and Construction Management, L.L.C. March 18, 1997 City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Vz r r-- ° Attn: Jamal Mahmoud Mi AR 199 9907 Re: Sidewalk Reconstruction Dear Jamal, I would like to propose the following solutions for the sidewalk slopes at the Edmonds Financial Center project, located at the corner of 2nd and James. 1) Demolish sidewalk on 2nd and James as noted on attached sketch. 2) Revise sidewalk profile to reflect a .005 slope from the backside of sidewalk to the existing curb, ns-yeti ested. 3) Revise 2nd Ave. entry stairs to have a sloped top step from 7" to 2 5/8" +/- (rise) which will match the new sidewalk profile. See 2nd Ave. section view. 4) Rework 2nd Ave. handrail base to reflect new sloped step. 5) Revise James St. sidewalk profile as noted on attached sketch. The new sidewalk would parallel the existing James St. entry stairs and would create a sloped step from 7" to 0". This step would run along the existing back of the sidewalk allowing pedestrians to distinguish between the new sloped step and the existing stairway. 6) No change to James St. stairs or handrails 7) No change to handicap ramp location, Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or are in need of additional information. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Land and.C)onstruction Manapment, LLC Y / \ Toj i Blaikie Superintendent P.O. Box 100 - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - 206 771-9118 - FAX 206 774-1132 00 9' S �1 eori - - otvos ;•. �.. / - xy 7" TY�) ,gas Ex is nni(� z •/ • • Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM April 3, 1997 110 James Street, Street Address File John Bissell, AICP, Associate Planner Parking requirements The building at 110 James Street is approved as a mixed use building with office space on the ground floor and 10 residential units on the floors above. The building has provided 63 parking stalls which are allocated as follows: Sq Ft. Parking Stalls:Floor Area 2 per unit 1:400 1:800 Dickison 2945 7 KMJ 1775 2 Am Ex 2657 7 Dewer Meeks 3482 9 The Hotel Group 1762 2 Singularity 703 2 10 du x 20 Total Used av STREET FILE City of Edmonds cza Planning Division LCMLand and Construction Management, L.L.C. City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Jamal Mahmoud Re: Sidewalk Dear Jamal, STREET FILE • March 18, 1997 R r MAR 18 1997 t`IVGiNEI-E-RING I would like to propose the following solutions for the sidewalk slopes at the Edmonds Financial Center project, located at the corner of 2nd and James. 1) Demolish sidewalk on 2nd and James as noted on attached sketch. 2) Revise sidewalk profile to reflect a .005 slope from the backside of sidewalk to the existing curb, WsWd. �q�q 3) Revise 2nd Ave. entry stairs to have a sloped top step from 7" to 2 5/8" +/- (rise) which will match the new sidewalk profile. See 2nd Ave. section view. 4) Rework 2nd Ave. handrail base to reflect new sloped step. 5) Revise James St. sidewalk profile as noted on attached sketch. The new sidewalk would parallel the existing James St. entry stairs and would create a sloped step from 7" to 0". This step would run along the existing back of the sidewalk allowing pedestrians to distinguish between the new sloped step and the existing stairway. 6) No change to James St. stairs or handrails 7) No change to handicap ramp location. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or are in need of additional information. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, L Land an4-Construction na ment, LLC Y, // ToBlaikie P.O. Box 100 • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • 206 771-9118 • FAX 206 774-1132 O _ ji ��►6/ SZ ) .,O =L 0 z rn oa a z G) • i U ��s� . 2s5 . tic i sn.✓� ,�r�E Z ",6 fqr� (/, cd---� 0 Inc. 18913 March 13, 1997 0 CITY OF EDMONDS El 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering Marty Spadafora Edmonds Financial Center Associates 121 - 5th Ave. N., Suite 123 Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR yn�-�%� 3 /1dy7 Subject: Parking configuration on west side of the building (110 - James St.) Dear .Marty, This is a letter of understanding regarding the parking configuration and number of stalls at 110 - James Street. I would like to remind you that the parking configuration/marking at the west side of the building is NOT according to the approved plan. Please submit a parking plan showing proposed configuration. The existing parking stalls are not acceptable and are not according to the City of Edmonds standards. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at 771-0220, extension 328. Sincerely, Jamal Mahmoud, PE Engineering Inspector JM/sf c: Permit coordinator rN.yamahp Being • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan � -- �'`�:��,��i:�`;R`. '-L"•.7;:.'� s..��:+.w+�'i�i�.�i'y'.`f'L'+�{�r'!�.�'-:': r�`rR,t�rh°P'�._.q��63 .}M�+��"r"r-"tiTr'�.i�- h. .[ �� r. ♦ �,r ;v�..`,y ,.�; ;,r .l .. .. ). - 8g0_1g°5- City of Edmons RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: �,- Issue Date: 6-- l �o A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific): Nallnumanee Repair C. Contractor: Washington Natural Gas Mailing Address: 1122 75 St SW Everett State License #: 98203 D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Contact: glindy Moeller Phone: 356-7541 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 1 F. Pavement or Concrete Cat : I[J Yes UNo Ci. Size of Cut: x ki. charge APPLICANT TO READ AN] SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold t4 City of Edmonds harmless frominjuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FOWES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. i Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. " Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Controltand Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read theIabove statements and understand the permit requirements and thepink copy of thepermit will be available on site at all tines for inspection p rposes. Signature: � \ Date: R-27-96 ( ntractor r Agent) VAT.T, nTAT._A-DIG PR.TOR. Tt RF.C`HNNING WORK I FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTERDAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ?AU_i A)C1 ( C� COMMENTS: DATE: RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT DISRUPTION"FEE/FUND III: RESTORATION FEE:" PERMIT FEE: - TOTAL FEE: RECEIPT FEE: ISSUED: BY. - w NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments• Diagram; (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: City Hof Edmon RIGHT 'OF -WAY CONSTRUCTION �- P RMIT Permit Number. 1 Issue Date: -7 13 V 9 i A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: P{ EL o F J0+_ e.S 4: Ro i V. oQ StS' 18 9 9 B. Type of Work (be specific): Cohstriect h e W concretu e 5 deo-,xgee-ttioll 0 - 1 ►''etaihi hc7 L�ItI� Gi.tr-% �gutt'ey For Iandih9 /^1 P0.d Far CYro bus Sip• C. ,Contractor: C7 T r G. Contact: Je r. h i f e r r w w C P r. A. K l: T r&AA c; n qq oe.xTyy, �S / 2 y -� Mailing Address: S' a �G G/ WA 4lPl0y Phone:yl.) j?9- S 3� State License #: G M-r1 Nj** O 9 q :0 7— Liability Insurance: y, Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. , g]Commercial ❑•,•Suhdjy_Vg ,. L, ;.: ❑,:,City;Prgject ❑, Utility (PU11jfGTE; WNG; CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family Other K; , ,, �,�,,,t yr Me, t-ru 7i•�c�h$ ,' � INSPECTOR: , Q m Q L.. INSPECTOR: / A F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ® Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: I x to H. Charge $V APPLICANT TO READ AN 3 . Nam? INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or ' employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costa, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. *THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK • ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. . • . . Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as 'required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be -:available on site -at -all -times -for inspection purposes:: -• = Signature: r '��• Date: �Ol2 7 ` (CO ractor or Agent) CALL VIAL-A-1J11i Y1t1U1t '1'U t$hW1N 1N 11N lx W UIMA I'my �--» FOR CITY USE ONLY APPRO D BY: `� !7l RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME UTHORIZED: VOID AFTER OC4 3) • 96 .DAYS-- ` ..DISRUPTION FEE/FUND,111 " SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE:"—t— V1�Q rr 1 V% 1 PERMIT FEE. 30 r e d 1 r P a t D k • L a ll 111.. 02. 2 0. TOTAL FEE: -'tv, 2 3 D COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE: DATE: % 13 0/ 26 ISSUE, DYBY: •� � � � NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT 'ISSUANCE - Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ❑ NO Memo JUL 2 3 1996 ENG//VEERING July 22, 1996 TO: Gordy Hyde, Traffic Engineer City of Edmonds FROM: Jennifer Townsend, 689-5236 Metro Transit Subject: Permit for ADA Improvement Enclosed: Right-of-way Construction Permit application Construction drawings of proposed work Check from King County for $30.00. Please issue a ROW construction permit to King County Transit for construction of a landing pad on the north side of James Street, 200 feet west of Sunrise, as set forth in construction drawings. Thank you. M.F:T R O T RA N S I T `—* Jp-nnifer M. Townsend Real Property Agent KING COUNTY Entironmental Planning and Real Estate/ Design and Construction Section Metro Transit Division Department of Transportation 821 Second Avenue M.S. 122 Seattle, WA 98104-1598 (206) 689-5236 FAX 684-1900 Internet: jennifer.townsend@metrokc.gov I �Y'�`. fit_" .w..+M��1f'i' 'C'.i.'t /.:••{'S",1'�ACi,�ti�'',rrJi �+W`'Y4 TJ7r�;°�.�•tFiVrS i G'�,}�l"FMJ, r,�i .Jq-.ra. "11( '1 7�i'4.....Y^.-T- 1 City. of Edm ... RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PIE Vf IT " Permit Number, ��3 <b g MAY 2 I^ Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Cogi� IWE� P0117 ames St (9611365 ) 18 --QMEN-- C) o B. Type of Work (be specific): Ins tall 2" MPE IP from 104' to 105' S 90 19 C/L James St & 171E C/L 2 Ay S on 2 AV S C. Contractor: Washington Natural Gas Mailing Address: 1122 75 St SW Everett State License #: 98203 D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Contact: Mariamne Kingsbury Phone: 356-7500 Ext 7596 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit li (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ® Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: I1SPECTOR: ,,,j F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ® Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: 4 x 2 H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ Aidb SIGN' y INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agree .�"- City of Edmonds hams-�ro� i i , damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may, de against the City of Edmo , or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR 1S RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required math permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please ckitthe Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: Date: (Contractor or Ag ) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR. _CITY� USE ONLY APPROVED BY: +C_*1 t RIGHT OF WAY -DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER `-t 'I 3 C) DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND III: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE: PERMIT FEE: 01,00 TOTAL FEE: COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE: DATE: - ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 i FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ` oy ' off4 c'5 �2 6 . 1 � 503 6 9.si , zq3 DATE: Dec. 9 S MEMO TO: //Q ./A1V6.3 ST. �� Di>a�10 S Fi ^>•4�/�i�t �z�TF�� FROM : F,�/! /,A/E&e iAJ-6- SUBJECT: SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES //� ��•�[ �S �Ti2 �s'l� Street Address) , /D .moo ..tea s F*1 n/ A i✓Gx.A-e- C �.✓rr�YL_ Legal Owner) Single Family Residence Subdivision Plat PRD Multiple Commercial 16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SC`F G✓��- -s p� �'`�s FobP�T CNO�� Z�'f T Z.F.F. Calculation: Z.F.F. x ( 5`�� ) _ $ 3 S 9. 83 ( ) Lateral x( ) _ $ Unit(s) x($25.00 ) _ $ �SO'Ov $ 3 ..00 $ 39-P3 st Connection Fee Lateral Charge Equivalent Count (when applicable) Trunk Charge Permit TOTAL 0 � STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES Dater Received of:L CheckAs A 9P Water Meter Size: Water Connection Sewer Permit/Repair Trunk Charge Sewer Connection/LID Fee�� R/W Construction Permit Street Restoration/Street Cut (620 Fund) Street Disruption Fee Eng . 2.2 o Inspection Fee , r� Eng. Specs. & Plans Storm Drainage Fee Street Use Permit Building Permit Plan Check Fee State Surcharge (Fund 622),�� Zoning Applications (Type) Shoreline Permits S.E.P.A. Review Recording Fee; Maps/Books P otostatina Tax Date of Hearing: Time: By: '. '' -� •-� �.. - _ Permit # : ` . DECLASTION OF RESTRICTIVE COVE T CN'"i"'Y CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS 505 SELL STRE>'z.- Rom,, finds Financial Center Associates LLC MMONDS, WA SI are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address: 110 James. Street Legal Description: (See Attached, Exhibit A) autLntNG E -- 0 E C 2 0 1995 Tax Account Parcel Number: 232703-1-059-0007 0 WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said tlld premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby F� declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed or the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than _LL__ units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future ow rs o d real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. i day o j, 199 Gr Grantor STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) 'I On this day personally appeared before me J %�'N 4 E �i' 1�/ (/. /�'/ ��? :� and to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed within the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. tl GIVEN under my hand and official seal this ��' of � Q•9'�C-+L Z , 19 I GI ( �L Notary Public in nd for'the State of Washington, resi ing at RESTRCOV.DOC !. 4) EXHIBIT A PARCEL A• That portion of the Section 23, ToWnship follows: Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of 27 North, Range 3 East,. W.M., described as Beginning at the Northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; THENCE West 338 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE North 101812211 East, a distance of 263.88 feet; THENCE North 8804112211 West, a distance of 231.24 feet to the Easterly margin of SR-104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2141566, said margin being a curve to the left having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears South 7205215911 East; THENCE Southerly along the arc of said curve to the left and consuming a central angle of 902711111, an arc distance of 82.49 feet to a point 100 feet Easterly, as measured radially to the L line, of Highway Engineers Station 20+00;. THENCE South 2302512711 West, a distance of 61.26 feet to a point opposite and 80 feet Easterly of Highway Engineers Station 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE South 1009/15/1 West, 80 feet Easterly and parallel to said L line, a distance of 106.83 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station 21+75; THENCE South 4402614511 East, a distance of 28.10 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineer Station 9+00 and 30 feet Northerly, as measured at right angles to the centerline of Dayton Street; THENCE South 8804112211 East, along the Northerly margin of Dayton Street, a distance of 249.74 feet to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT the East 30 feet thereof for road. DATE RECEIVE ). k // PERMIT EXPIRES 7 CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION ' SUITE/APT#RESS 11D f AOD OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ONE. tF-J A1r41; $ RoA Zotirc T6.tj JRMfl CON PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. W MAILING ADDRESS LID FEE $ RW Approved I I 0 J ("S 5 ST PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP Pe RW Permit RequI's Street use Permit Req'd CITY ZIP TELEPHONE I� 6 EXISTING PROPOSE Inspection Required Sidewalk ReqRequiredb , S)M O li95 �� -7 C y�o REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground Wiringmd Wiring required Q NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 13 NO 0 REMARKS W = ADDRESS = OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLIDRAINAGE CITY ZIP TELEPHONE S lu udi URA NAME CB t,s `� _ ��LEMI�V C �1� — 1/v w 1..M t•t ENGINE RINGREVI WED BY DATE y ,� j:! >>..r: ? t .� ADDRESS 1115 N `�� , .. T ' 1 3 r d D ATE F. REV.-' /mil UJI CITY ZIP 't a TELEPHONE. _ �� 6 3 �F s ' ~' �� a rL V IANCE OR 96 S ADj INSPECTION OONO BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER PIR ION DATE CHECKED BY f. I✓ �q` M �'1,&:::��PYES $ PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCELNO. SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIdN AREA. ALLOWED PROPOSED, - HEIGHT :-ALLOWED PROPOSED cc) 6 o©Q�,�avo 4 4 > EXP' y 1 ❑ NEW 0 RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE •� ,REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.)-- -PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) COMPLIANCE OR ALLOWED PROPOSED, -" FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR > e r7 _ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL i❑ C ❑ CHANGE OF USE ►_x7 190 u E� W z y ❑ REMODEL MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN PARKING REO'D PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED:BI' DATE �j S d REPAIR Q GRADING ❑ FENCE ,.:... _. CYOS ./, /� ( X FT) REMARK 1 ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER I�Jck ❑GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ ❑ _ CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, BUS SS OR NITY) EXPLA s g (��f�/^' CHECKED BY F CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT ry1 GROUP e G NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF 3 DWELLING I AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTION AREA OCCUPANT O STORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS t, Z ' - W PROGRESS INSPECTIONS.PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REG'Q 9 2Ao F G /Wit m f—'E7 � S ��2� �•IC. S fl VALUATION %ZEJ OTC�eC CD Cor+C/t£-I W A t..Lj $ / Q �v Descrlptiori ,. FEE Description FEE r Plan Check _ State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % "'" .,_y i'LOTr9LOPE % Building:Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHE N VESTED DATE 'Plumbing Base Fee ., Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO It BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading 7 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review Ix W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS d PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF Q EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection .... Receipt # p I ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY 9 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due / = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE C17Y'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and ' IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SI AT E N G NT) DATE ✓E1D ' O `1eiF_0220 MOG&JI DATE G_ %%/A/�C� • • REL ED BY DATE ATTENTION M 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW -INSPE OR 09/03 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR MAKING 4 COPIES CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS r--.P{vl OW l->�, F I rQ /" I` I C I r\ i c .� r• . � '.C,' I �Z MAILING ADDRESS 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER e. NAME ADDRESS �.� c-, v �-, j• �l T � rf CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER NAME L.� t�-1 r� � Curl �,'j f'- UG 1 t o,t�► M f-t��t�!r�'Pi" ADDRESS �. o CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER ST;jLICENSE NUMBER EXPIR 10 DATE ,4iVO R L t Legal Description of Property - include all easements t� Ubt: PERMIT t\ ZONE / 2 NUMBER 9 5 v 3 9 k ,ADDRESS I I A In•o r- C. -7— Property Tax Account �r�jZ'?. -2 i Q rj00 Parcel No. 1 1 a NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING I�t El ADDITION LL 1 COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL �, APT. SLOG. REMODEL SIGN a FENCE REPAIR LjS,j CYDS. L_—X_FT) DEMOLISH INSERT SWIM POOL HOT TUBSPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ RENEWAL CAQwROCKERY i (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: l 0 r i ;nn 6 R. C I A L,. li U C LEI V rf I Y 5 NUMBER NUMBER dF DWELLING ' INUMBER�« CRITICAL STORIES UNITS 'DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) 0�: F=� 14 i .I ; v r L) 4-o 0 --1 1-T r 7MIr _. PUBLIC RIGHT O WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET. MAP. TESCP Approved l� RW Permit Requned �Q EXISTING L- REQUIRE DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd Inspection Required PROPOSED Sidewalk Required . METER SIZE LINE SIZE I NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES YS NO EMARKS� �.,� Aeoo �r f yg : . ` __ ,^ F ILIi�;il:tl , aJ. �, � I-•I+,lit Z W Ihl' i•l+) (All 1fu1/ 'It' + ,ii'� �dI�1(•Til;"it. l'f Till ':�' 7tr rl�l,'1 �' "jY ?A',j :NGINEERING MEMO DATED , . RIEVIEW ED BY l r„ LL SIGN AREA SEPAREVIEW _,AOB NO PROPOSED CQI�PL TE EXEMPT /T �� [/� ��ALLOWED yr ELINE u SH711 EXP S' a VARIANCE OR CU LA G REVIEW BY E SETBACKS — FEET FRONT V SIDE REAR *EIGHT LOT COVE5rAGE ? Z a RGMARKR a Ai ; 12, rT w o PROGRESSI j�.s FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: % (9A GLAZING � b % PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE n w f iwhatever 0 • 4"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend' and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance ENO. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT i modify; waive nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE k :w:irr7 Jar' tJ CODE OCCUPp�(r•1 GROU W+�...� A# OCCUPA T O LOAD I Z UBC 305 s J s FEE 7203 rA T 2F letwir Sa I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL Information given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES THE signed by the Building Official or his/her ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is Code of th a of as 'ng n relating to Workmen's Compensa- acknowledged in space provided. tion In r n an C t8. INSPECTION SIGf� NE R ENT DATE SIGNED / DEPARTMENT SIGNAT RE D%TE n �7 CITY OF f �7 2— EDMONDS *OFFICIAL'S /.CALLFOR INSPECTION BY. DATE �4Ll1`' { E T IT IS UNLAWFUL TO SE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR �� OwAO 11 ORIGINAL — F le YELLOW —Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC r;NAPTFR 3. 1*1/*7► r PINK — O%&-er GOLD — Assessor C ty of Edmonds Permit No: //__1 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: �I�dC'S+ S F B. Type of Work (be specific): &!w = Ole �/�� t k •1G '-c r9�'C�rr��nl%" C. Contractor: IG e6- W Contact -:in,,/ L Mailing Address: �qS Phone: ZW J State License #:SI �2G 10 % N►�1 to Liability Insurance: Bond: City Business License #: / � / D. Building Permit # (if applicable): P4,� " �3Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON,,55E, COMCAST, OVWSD) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: R YES ❑ NO G. ❑ Mail Approved Permit � Call for Pickup INDEMNITY: Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PI K COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: ' Date: Contractor or Agent) FOR'CITY: U! Approved by: 1116C Time Authorized: Void After Special Conditions: 42UP 57-12 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: LY1. Right of way„Fee .. /A0 Disruption-Fee/ndA 14: Inspection -:•Fee Call 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 for a 24-hour voice -recorded inspection request line. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK. DATE?! ` 'T O s' spector's Signature NO WORK SHAI,LPRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE i CADocuments and Settings\Curtis\My Documents\Fomis\Engnrng\ROWpermit_ doc Rcvised 10/01/03 I A City of Edmonds Permit No: N/_�9f�' - RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: . tfL • n t A . Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific): sG&RWOIN45 46C81W /nl '510N ffC.r' ff=%A r A -_. _- - _.w. _ _ __ . _ �.._. __ ICI w- C. Contractor: Vt. C-- Contact: � ; �( q%S T" Phone: 10 �L3 4{D �=JS �� t Mailing Address: / �qr State License #--_T_ l� n'7 l �� Liability Insurance: Bond: $ mo City Business License #: 1 1/l t D. Building Permit #r,(if applicable): 9 Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): e tr E. ,Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, COMCAST, OVWSD) Multi -Family ElSingle Family ❑ Other / INSPECTOR: _U OW11, F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ YES O G. SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES NO G. ❑ Mail Approved Permit ❑: Call for Pickup INDEMNITY. • Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or, claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or anv of its departments or emplovees, including but not limited to the defense o_f anv legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR 'FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I4RJT MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FO-R� INSPECTIONS T� )Signature: ' Date: (Contractor or Agent) FO R CITY USE ONLY Approved by: Right-of=way:Fee • OI i,�('�`* f l'S Time Authorized: Void After / 7. Disruption Fee/Fund '11:.0 Special Conditions: '3(i 0i f�lhlbc ?D 't GT Inspection'Fee: -- .2 i4g1 J 0w571Zf4Aj ::WA)AjPy L -ro go, Total.Fee: �2555 MIi�LIP331n 11yN, -rn •11t6rff?—Dll�fvt Receipt No': ... jWSMen TO 57 -d5. Issued -by: INS Call 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 fora 24-hour FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: ; CADocuments and Settings\Cuttis\My Documents\Fortis\Engnrng\ROWpermit_ doc qrd=d��MsWkxequrIT11he r /� t" `u DATE: ,s Signature ERMIT ISSUANCE Revised 10/01/03 r' rP ►S . 405 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS yarl%yv s PV`^`L Mti_TI 12 p556� MAILING ADD� ✓l�1A /rt. I v ✓ w ADDRESS a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER WJ1- - °I NAME IADD�SO to STATE LICENSE NUMBER r _ , EXPIRA - include all easements, OW I o J Property Tar Account •i 7v, i—O3/ 3 Parcel No. (i Z I v -6?51 (J 1 NEW 'RESIDENTIAL CJ PLUMBING/MECH El -ADDITION. J4 COMPLIANCE OR COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE 19 APT: BLDG. REMODEL SIGN a GRADING FENCE REPAIR CYDS. L_X_FT) DEMOLISH WOOSWIM a. POOL ",'INSERT.. HOT TUB SPA CAR ORT EIAOCKERY ETAINI`kG+WALV RENEWAL z (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS.OjI ACTIVITY)EXPLAIN: ZONE PERMIT 13C zoNNUMBER JOB I l o ADDRESS J 65 5i5 p PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required ❑ PROPOSED Sidewalk Required ❑ u°1 METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED a I YES ❑ NO ❑ REMARKS uw1 w z MEMO DATED SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE JEXEM EXP VARIANCE OR CU PU VIEW BY REVIEWED BY ADB NO. ' SETBACKS — FEES DE REAR I HEIGHT I LOT COVERAGEV I FRONT a 'SPECIAL REQUIRED INSPECTOR YES . I OCCUPANT REA I LOAD "f PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 4W0104 loaOber S34 Attowe 2764 NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF' DWELLING: UNITS �� CRITICAL AREAS /�d NUMBER / • n v avo- A /2. g S I %p9Q_ ' DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) e�nl FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED / / / 1-orl � I� ` ( _ VI/ , 1 {�Q VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE of 110. 1�1` V BUILDING /�000 I HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING / l PLUMBING r I Plan Check No, MECHANICAL Se, 0*I1 r Q�► mir , a / This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require Separate permission. GRADINGIFILL STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application:180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold 3 harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of i whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." ENO. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT z� —213 JW TOTAL AMOUNT DUE .��- 6 I hereb acknowledge that I have read this application* that the y information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz' AurHORlzlas This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and 7. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATURE (OWNER A ENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT • 1 CITY OF EDMONDS 0 AL'S S NATURE DATE ATT NTION CALL FOR RELE Y,W' DATE r INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR �� OG�O ORIGINAL — File YELLO I A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC — spectc SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10247 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME /NAAM�EEOOF�!B'USINESS w MAILING AODRES 0 2lf hNl� (23 CI�TTYY ��/�/\((�/\A2� ZIP TELEPHONENUMBER NAME �4,1Q�� w ADDRESS � I� � ✓ 2 U a CITY ZIP ITELEPHONE NUMBER rink -12 °�lono - xI4 NAME E STATIi LICENSE NUk4SER / t�� EXPIRATION DATE L-Ikp ki Legal Desscc�r�i(pttion of Property - include all easements A\.. --r-I VATM Tax el ount Z Z 7 — p1 �3' /,� 0L"IX— t 0 Parcel No. 7 V V✓� � V NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBINGIMECH COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION, OMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE REMODEL2' APT. BLDG, SIGN 11 ElGRADING 1:1FENCE REPAIR CYOS. (x_FT) DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE ,INSERT. SWIM POOL HOT TUB SPA GARAGE CARPORT _f ROCKERYG WALL/ ` RENEWAL., TYPE E, BUSINES OR 'ACTIVITY) PLAIN: o OF USGr2 ` �`a,✓t� l T �- NUMBER OF NUMBER OF DWELLING I CRITICAL AREAS STORIES l/- UNIT UNITS �, /�� NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TOBE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) '- JAI USE ZONE PERMIT ZONE G NUMBER JOB ADDRESS ((Q STr /O a UBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ XISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ ❑ PROPOSED cr METER SIZE I LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED a YES 0 NO ❑ 3 C7 MARKS 2 W w Z ENGINEERING MEMO DA SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ALLOWED I PROPOSED I COMPLETE (EXEMPT I I EX:„ I VARIANCE OR CU I . P VIEW BY /A'08 N FRONT SETBACKS — FEESIDE REAR I HEIGHT I LOT CNVERA�E I 0M.AAL IN0rt'"M AMCA OCCUPANT REQUIRED- Z`IQ� LOAD', � YE3 V �7 MARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 Z 0 1_14A ud z 318s r l av&4 2.739 oicwoud FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE 5 LDYiee to PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING �7Y1 HEAT SOURfE �j GLAZING /%�/��t Vi,Y'�VGje % PLUMBING ,e,44jeA%+ A.. 1,eom ir Plan Check No. MECHANICAL sey A JIB � I This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Sd Permit Application:180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the Clty's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT �� TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application• that the information given is correct; and that 1 am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz. AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and .27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIG ATU E IOWNER O AGE , GATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF 0 CtAI'S SIOGNATURE DATE EDMONDS0- W_ AT NTION CALL FOR INSPECTION - WTE S �S` IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 77J Owwo ORIGINAL File YELLOW I -Spector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC 1 11 — n SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10247 w J . (4 CITY OF EDMON DS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER 9 (C) 54 5 JOB06L I O I YT APT N ADDRESS OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS v LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO, LID NO ZMAILING ADORE$s PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION TESCP Approved O RW Permit Required O Street Use Permit Req'd O CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER �� 1 Il V „ � Inspection PROPOSED Required O Sidewalk Required O � w � _ ,_ a NAME 1 'V V IIJV ` METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES O O NO a 3 0 ADDRESS _ .i7G /-vK}cq J� REMARKS Z i CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER o b NA E O ADORESro S ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY U z o U CITY IP TELEPHONE��R FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY ¢_ ` STATE LICENSE NUMB R EXPIRATION DATE L KL 2 SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADS NO. V�IV�y ALLOWED I PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP a Legal Description of Property -Include all easement so/' T L, SHORELINE N VARIANCE OR CLI LA VIEW BY T Lu 0 J SETBACKS — FEET FRONT SIDE REAR HEIGHT LOT COV AGE z z Tex Property Parcel No. _-/.- —/5t -00 R M RKS g NEW RESIDENTIAL I1 PLUMBINGIMECH OR CJ /J / �� //B� I /) CCOMPLIANCE ADDITION COMMERCIAL HANGE OF USE/�i!/—•/ REMODEL APT. SLOG. SIGN CHECKED BY TYPE OF C STRUCTION CODE N OCCUPANT GRADING FENCE REPAIR CYDS. El I x_FT) wOr-pov w o m SWIMPOOL' DEMOLISH �aWSERTWOOOS70VE,. El GARAGE RETAINING WALL/;: CARPORT �/ RO¢I(IRY _ , RENEWAL SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED REQUIRED 13 YES AR ITA OCCUPANT OAD/Q !!! REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 0 (TYPE FUSE, BUSINESSZOATIvJTY) Ex LAIN: "� ALkogS NUMBER NUMBER OF -/ CRITICAL DWELLING ,V/4' JAREAS STORIES NUMBER 104 STORIES UNITS / - Lr Ai /3�td f/�//or d Z�3ow wd /8/f DESCRIBE WORA TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ( W^1 — N VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE 2_O7- ''111^^ BUILDING %` /"r 3�/, HEAT $OUR�,F,A r 7 d/��'w�/_jI� GI.I�ING Ira duo PLUMBING s�WAJW OeAml �,�'JVV % Plan Check NO. MECHANICAL "/ This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE 4,S7D Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENO. INSPECTION FEE y tnuj successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, 5 < = i employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ..�� 7 c� TOTAL AMOUNT DUE �cz Q� I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL Information given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and PXoVAM27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATUR tOW R 0 AGE DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT S CITY OF 0 I SIGNATURE E I EDMONDS ".311i ATTE ION CALL FOR RELE BY: DATE INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE �� 0220 UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELL W Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor tozar jj%WK MOVS. O USE CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE Zo 8 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATq10Nj 0 OWNER NAME/NAME OF NESS ADDRESS 110 a?MAMI X3 d rAMIZ, LEGAL DESCRIPTION I 1 Fo T NAME ADDRESS L-C, M WDRESS STATE LICENSE NUMBER 12fm L, Legal DescriptioF Property,�, - Tax Account '7**2 1 1:1 ADDITION 50REMODEL REPAIR DEMOLISH GARAGE CARPORT OF OW STORIES UNI DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE E PERMIT NUMBER jlftllvt� ST. .0 Ir-A -.4 A (I PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required C3 EXISTING — REQUIRED DEDICATION — 1 Street Use Permit Req 'd 0 PROPOSED Inspection Required 0 . Sidewalk Required 0 REMARKS ENGINEERING. MEMO DATED REVIEW BY ar METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES TELEPHON9,NLIMS R U) ZIP P� REMARKS, SEPA REVIEW ADS NO. J 'COMPLETE EXEMPT rt r include ,'All(base-'me'nti""' SHORELINE N EXP', �VAFIIANCE:OFI cy`�*--�'.',*1: L41kN VIEW BY SETBACKS' FEET",' HEIGHT LOT CO RAGE FRONT SIDE t REAR �REMARKS IOEN PLUMBING TIAL NG v. IMERCIAL ;MECHANICAL elr. iG„Z4A CHECKED BY c TYPE 'OF'CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT t IMPOOL1*'* HPT.TUB/ SPA OCCUPANT SPECIAL INSPECTOR; jj��j OCCUPAN C Y+ .* - ". REQUIRED '' - �, - 13 3 —diftJ , y OROUP LOAD RENEWAL REMARKS 4 4 Ciot6t�, RO INISPECTIONS'PIEF,CUBC 305 . lopw AREAS�Cyri/rLjJ44VJ NUMEIER`',J tj nce%iiiiinan 1/y I-tf IL7 (/V' j 01011 WT11i14 PLAN CHECK FEE a 'o, HEAT SOURCE- :GL I,NGo % ,�,"'ADtHA4fie- PLUMBING Plan Check No. 6?z 4 C7 1 MECHANICAL ADINGIFILL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction.on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquess, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE ENO. INSPECTION FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in Interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold uj harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, 2 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance 0 nor limit In any way the City's.ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no pars will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of thtState of ashington relating to Workmen's Compensa- ER WORK NOTED tion Insura e. INSPECTION SIGNATURE (Mf IV DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS %Ij ATTENTrON �k CALLIFOR INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 771-0220 UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. USC CHAPTER3. ATI-ON FEE_ 50-3 ewrx I&em) r a4m I Ae" ir V 34Z 7 -I&W 5057-5,0 kibsq� APPLICATION APPROVAL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and fees are pjtld, and receipt Is acknowledged in spacd-Orovided. NATURE 7/ TE 31 W , A; ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor Ajll-` i�l� 1 i v 4 ,,.//\J IIT USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION' JOB 0 ilr� � I APT N ADDRESS V '' •• - OWNER NAME NAME O{F�BL�SINESS ' -�p V Vn 1 1V\ K0j t"t V t/It7 • ��M LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. i. MAILING ADORES OrV Pi PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFF EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATIONT MAP. PROPOSED TESCP Approved RW Permit Required Street Use Permit Req'd Inspection Required Sidewalk Required O O O O O pr CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER 5 U NAME 1�� O METER SIZE LINE SIZE OF FI RES PRV REQUIRED YES O NO ❑ ADDRESS Z,"14A REMARKS Z w CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER O + (01 O NAME LAY^ w xvj U1 V 0 ENGIN RIN E 10 D TED REVIEWED BY P!: CITY ZIP TELE� NUMBER z Y I�l�, fi FIRE ATE REVIEWED BY w ¢_ 9 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DAT OSEE SIGN AREA still AD Legal Description of Property - include all easements' : ALLOWED PROPOSED COMXEMP ORELINE N Z O P a IANCE OR CU N N VIEW BY T O SETEIACKS—F T GHT OVERAG t7 Z w wi Property :FRONT '' BIDE jL6T EAR. Tax Account ,.. % / h MAR KS S Parcel No: NEW` RESIDENTIAL ,'. MBINCNECH' CO LIANCE OR / I �G.&,Ofau J a ADDITION.,' ; COMMERCIAL CH GE OF USE.. REMODEL APT. BLDG. SIGN GRAD FENCE C CKE Y TY Oi.CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT REPAIR CroS_ L_x_Fq �M/ DEMOLISH WOODST SWIM POOL INSERT °. HOT TUB/SPA SPE LIN$PE R AREA AGR CU GARAGE TAININO LU a REQUIRED YES . EMARKS /'�`/V'w(J CARPO KERY ;, . ,RENEWAL' t7 0 (TYPE F USE. B INESS'' vITY) LAI ' .�1�� PRO ESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 z NUMBER ,NU EW'61 CRITICAL HT6 aC SIS �I WC � Olt o m0 OF STORIES DINE 'ING /��d NIT " ' / r:7 ' AREAS NUMBER . gim DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DO TTACH.PLOT PLAN) to FINAL,INSPECTION REQUIRED �u� ems:. VALUATION FEE `PLAN CHECK FEE Z GLAZING BUILDING /�/ y) HEAT SOU CE: r0 9/0 wv PLUMBING,se- P�Zo �T Plan Check No. MECHANICAL ��.{d� /7F/7'` IW� This Permit covers work to be done on priva property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, aldewelks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application:180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENO. INSPECTION FEE H successors in interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, S. employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of a whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance = Of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance Sy i nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and .27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNAT RE (OWNER O G 1 - DATE SIGNED /— L DEPARTMENT CITY OF OF IAL'S IGNATURE DATE LM r1 ll// EDMONDS epm ATTENTION CALL FOR LEASED BY: DATE INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR �� OwwO .. 11 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10247 F 1 I USE PERMIT 9o+'7�p ZONE CITY OF EDMONDS NUMBER ((..))'' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB ��„� SUITEAPTa QWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS i /'D n MAILING LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO LID NO w ADDRESS OZ -7 (- [�� 1, _ '° ? ;� L lk; a r PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP, TESCP Approved ❑ I J CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION RW Permit Required ❑ Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ i I (>' •+, o PROPOSED Inspection Required ❑ Sidewalk Required ❑ 1 NAME /y'/Jl }} ��LL11 / METER SIZE LINE SIZE N0. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED a YES ❑ NO ❑ ADDRESS Z ��{j ( r I ` REMARKS ! 1 �./��/� 4 O/ OWA--!r IS �i'/ dve- ¢ ' Z aCITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER 7 Z i1 lClllN�� a NAME � c— ' /. ; r Les) C- � �dlhG�} S BfJ+'' �^ �ln �ri" //�i1�t' ((•!- lJl�ft% oc ADDRESS f ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY i LC , Zj-r t. CITY ZIP TELEPHONE `•, za �'� �> NUMBER FIRE MEMO DATE RE WED BY _ aLo aAv / s w LL U STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE �°c2�kd � • SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADB NO. '••"•� '( '- ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPEXEMPT Legal Description of operty - include all easements }ZI I C .! J EX U' 0. VARIANCE OR CU L&~G REVIEW BY L) W r ' J SETBACKS — FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE Z Z t� Prop ):'/ ir< �_ t. ` ?' - ! < FRONT SIDE REAR a a REMARKS Tax Account Parcel No.;:.l,-t I*:L. I NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL 10 C- ADDITION a APT. SLOG. SIGN > Q' G jf REMODEL GRADING FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONS?RUCTION AA CODE GCOC PA REPAIR CYDS. (__x_FT► R� OVE SWIM POOL DEMOLISH a INSERT I NSERT HOT TUB/SPA SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAHLA REOUIRED 4KYES O CUPANT LOAD GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT El ROCKERY D RENEWAL EMARKS z i s E of USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 s J (TY J' m H NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL Gf� O OF DWELLING UNITS AREAS NUMBER ✓ STORIES./ y _ Z, DESCRIBE WORK TO IIE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED t EXCAVATE 9700 cydS FOR NEW BUILDING VALUATION FEE lI PLAN CHECK FEE 30 INSTALL SHORING AND UTILITIES I BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING PLUMBING I Plan Check No. MECHANICAL i GRADINGIFILL 8 This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewPlks, driveways, marquees,'etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE rn successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold ; w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, j 2 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of i whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance i of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN -CHECK DEPOSIT 0 J modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x° nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly i authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES signed by the Building Official or his/her ad thereby, no p rson will be employed In violation of the Labor WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is Code of e t e of ashin ton relating to Workmen's Compensa acknowledged in space provided. tion Lns r and C 1827. % INSPECTION SIG T R I NER A ENT DATE SIGNED " DEPARTMENT• NATURE DATE i CITY OF EDMONDSi CALL FOR OAT ELEA �p N, N INSPECTION IT I UNL F L T US OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE A NA INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR % 7 1 022o ORIGINAL — File YELLO — inspector UNTIL / A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — 0-,%rer GOLD — Assessor SR 104 2nd AVENUE S OEOTECH CONSULTANTS LEGEND: (l APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 2nd AVE S AT JAMES ST EDMONDS, WA Job No. Ooze+ Sco/e P/ole' 11 941T5 OCT 1995 1 LOCATION MAP PREDESIGN REVIEW SET 6=18=95 FOR "INFORMATION ONLY INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET NO. DRAWING NO. TITLE GENERAL j1. 13101 VICINITY/LOCATION MAPS I AND. INDEX DRAWINGS CIVIL 2. C101 ZONE 85674 3. C201 SECTIONS AND DETAILS 4. C202 SECTIONS AND DETAILS CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 DESIGNED I 7�;mETRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle �v 6-95 DRA: JCHKO: SCALE: BUS- ZONE ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENT FILE RK NONE JAMES ST AND SUNSET AVE DWG. NO. RECOM. CONTRACT: VICINITY/LOCATION MAPS G 101 APPROVED AND INDEX OF DRAWINGS FH-7 1 of 4 NOTES: 1. SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT, CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER. AS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, LANDING PAD WITH RETAINING WALL AND SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY. 2. CONSTRUCT A NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH CURB AND GUTTER. SEE SECTION 1, DRAWING C201. 3. CONSTRUCT A NEW CONCRETE LANDING PAD WITH RETAINING WALL. SEE SECTION 2, DRAWING C201. 4. CONSTRUCT A CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY MODIFICATION. SEE...DETAIL C, DRAWING 201. 5. PLACE NEW BUS SIGN AT LOCATION AS SHOWN. DETAIL B. DRAWING 201 ASPHALT PARKING LOT Lit i0 Q 0 0 i �' z LLJ 102.61 1.01.96 i 02. 33 101.98 Cn CONCRETE SIDEWALK :7 .-EXPANSION JOINT x 100.02 PK NAIL 02.36 e 0 T m m Ln 0 3 0 CV U cn cp 0 0 cm cLj Ln Ln U y CONCRETE — SIDEWALK COMPACTED SUBGRADE 7'-6„ CURB AND GUTTER .1 _, • A SECTION rT*� SCALE: NO �O2 TACK COAT JOINT 3/8"x4" EXPANSION EDGE WITH JOINT MATERIAL (TYP) 1 /4" RADIUS SIDEWALK/ NEW CONCRETE LANDING PAD CURB AND GUTTER (TYPE A) ° TACK COAT JOINT -III=III ° 11 it d COMPACTED SUBGRADE 1 ''I I li 1 1 /2 =11=0oo �o�C1117 I III —III— I I—� I III-1 I —I I_ TACK COAT JOINT 4" COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE THICKENED EDGE AT NEW CONCRETE CURB DETAIL rT� SCALE: 1 "=1 '-0" — PREDESIGN REVIEW SET 6=18=96 FOR INFORMATION ONLY 2' MIN FROM BUS SIGN I I ROADWAY (METRO) I I BUS SIGN PEDESTAL ASSEMBLY I I (SUPPLIED BY METRO) II i II 3/4" SS SEXBOLTS W/WASHERS II II AND SPANNER HEADS ITT -ril (SUPPLIED BY METRO) ,I=T-If I I� I I II I 1 /2" o SS KWIK BOLT WITH CONCRETE I II ANCHOR — 3 1 /2" MINIMUM EMBED �! i1 USE PEDESTAL FOR ANCHOR LOCATION 4 REQ'D (SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR) d 11 11 a d II II BUS SIGN PEDESTAL MOUNT DETAIL B SCALE: NONE �01 6" 1'-0" CONCRETE LANDING PAD 1 — .. 6 6' COMPACTED SUBGRADE CURB AT BACK OF LANDING -PAD SECTION 2 SCALE: NONE �O2 r-- DRIVEWAY MODIFICATION DETAIL rc SCALE: NONE C102 PREDESIGN REVIEW SET 6=18=99V FOR INFORMATION ONLY DESIGNED Department of Transportation — Transit Division O0P ICHKO: SCALE: BUS ZONE ACCEBILITY IMPROVEMENT RK 1 = 10 JAMES ST AND SUNSET AVE RECOM. CONTRACT: King County APPROVED ZONE 85674 DwG. NO. C202 SHT OF a a .. .. 3 .. � _ _ _ .. .. i is r i ��Kd� •, �A--�•yr�r�ov1,' � r .�, . ��•oO:�.i ''. _�ti!rt•@x�:url�_ r�0�dl�oi,Yrr�>AI�,[:'00�o!'eo_�t: �a.�a'�—.nm �� ;a�3:,,mr.�.rmu.-,c�uof^•>w''-•av:�vcaumr��u..mF.,eoo��.:e !OISE . 1�srYM/Mgtd - r.i• U�Fnon! CeNG rLr.nTCt it y�i I11 R(A CQCSUTa\T I ..�..w ... v i. . � �•• .. b.i4 cwrrtLiC O/LL. Y.rX a Ae �� i ` iLlAl►ti1Vu+fc Wuy Z . i a��nvun i 0 m w.+e XO6 •ioo . ...' ..� .. nCNegi.0 .W MG r,K ...r..... r..uu .r. ..r.. r...... ......r "• X Ls•.a'Yreb rM r•VnPe. n� 9ruM•••- — O � �� . EVERGREEN TREE STARING DETAIL - _ =---... YI R..rren it _. _. . _........... ..... O W G'; j_ 'W .... e......_.. I - -- . . .. LVYnwrltb Vlrau - GROUND COVER' PLANTING P - % w n a�rrry i. wiN.wn .................. -_ __-`-_' M !—_.1'►Wc .6�oa ... _5d'.ti�o`D'.:iF1= ` 4vvE1M�Y CTFers;i o" a W 0 tl. ma �_ :W t« 00 �me a=e^- Oam Dwti: U. - 2Yrawn. Ar: �G Ks. 77 1will N !z 3 if ilia fill w P111111: [if Iqq;I 111mippil — — - ae�� '? - m Qkob$o�xp v oR2�rw$p�ro� aoz �� b �. y -•ii HOP I P1111111 v as .„ G T o p §� v� r _ • a 1T l i trt M, o� 13 r. �rR Y O HI gg B ggjd s� het' gg (/� s 5..... yp cif) Q yf QQ t dIHR[f ill q rn' m O Co jg of . yy ril •, .rn . , UW . Cm. flat lit o z rrn ,z o ' 28. .,cj c J s :-I �m .. pyy m ilE:�. r o m m F� 10 52 �.. N ? - €a ov oa y d� gQ�nea � R ECF ry JAN 2 7 2004 PERMIT COUNIER S TE1LE - __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ . _ . .. _. I ;.r - . 1, - s .< - e`. k: . ., . • . . ,+ � r u \( •.T; > a T r . ; i Edmonds Financial Center ' Temporary Shoring at east side. F � .. i. j S Shoring Wall, Ver 2.0, (c) 1993 CVE ----------------- ' ---------INPUT DATI`---------- - I Height = 7.00 (ft) Above grade I . . . Depth = 15.42 (ft) To bottom of pile ------ i . Total = 22.42 (ft) <_ I. Length of Pile L _ - - - �` 7 . Pie Data Sol Data _ . -- ---- - - Spc,ci,-Vq= &00 (ft) : Active- 40 (pet) ,1 - - i Diameter-- 22.00 (in) ; , Passive= 300 (pcf) . Acting on 2 pie diameters I 1 �- i f i 1. t Uniform Surcharge 1fiG psf Point Surcharge 0 Ibis Dist. from; 1.5 ft ' - __ -_- , _- .. . 1 ---------------- i . ----------------i'---------QUTPUT----------------------- Overturning Moment 341{1 K-FT i Passive Moment 344.0 K-FT Mr%Mo= 1.01 /%, . Bending Moments on Ple ' ; x/� Dist. From Top Moment Bottom .2*Depth is neglected. FT K-FT i 1.12 -- 0.88 ' 2.24 -- 3.62 I e 3.36 -- 9.�6 4.48 -- 1T.67 Maximum moment in Ple = 128.88 k-ft ; 5.60 -- 29.4.9 i I �4 6.73 __ 45.17 Approx. Deflection top = 0.644 in 7.85 -- 64.05 I . x ' 8.97 -- 82 55 E = 3600.0 ksi BASEMENT WALL ` 10.09 -- 10633 I = 11499.0 in 4 , . , . - 4 I • '" 11.21 -- 11475 f 12-33 -- 124.7'f I . �i i 3.45 -- 128 83 14.57 -- 125:71 W16X40 Mr-- 129 k-ft OK 15.69 -- 11179 , 16.81 -- 91:67 . 17.93 -- 57.90 I 19.05 -- It L 19.33 -- -2e82 . ; 1111 A jztl ' ' _ - i'j - _ - . I. . . 4 - ' . �I' I . .. DESIGN COMPLIES IMTH INFORMATION FROM GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. GgRq �qB SUBGRADE PREPARATION, DRAINAGE PROVISIONS, AND OTHER RELEVANT - - _____ _ SOIL CONSIDERATIONS. `SH:4LL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SOILS REPORT. t - .. __ . 1 --7--7-_ . ' 0.::.II VERIFY EXISTING GRADE AT ROPERTY LINES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION --- i; ; I:;' -- --- ' �� - ''. ; ' -- - - AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF A, Y DISCREPANCIES. ! \-- . _-;�. . I , 1- DRILLING CRITERIA SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED'BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. BUILDING FOUNDATION PILE 1 PILE GROUT - fc=1500 psi j 11 il1 6 .4 .-. ;j1'.I It �;'� ii; . ;, ;1 C lI )L C t - , .,.!i I�1,� Y - - - .. i r .. . ,I •i , I 11 - --('_ -- --•--- ----- .. I 11 I 11 TEMPORARY FENCE -----__`11 I r'VIC`T1►If'` (•t too i II - j J) _ 1 1, e - llL - W16X40 (A36) i ill11 i� tI ,n _ - - . STEEL PILE ..-- 1 ;'f,i a j!I'� -- .. -- Y 11. 4X LAGGING - _ Ip - - . 1!11! I,t., ,illy ;1; 1 ;° ; ,' - x; I I . Y - _ ! 1 -. 4 f - i 1 -- i. K I I 22" DIAMETER AUGER; I AT 8�-0•o.c. - i ; • . r DETAIL �,J1 x i _, _-- . { �/ . I .° , ., ,. .. . . -: . . . ' v I r . /.� .. ..._ iv. -_ r } _ _i. -. ice.: �. . �^ s_ f' - .. .... .�... • _ .. .. I . - - I . : I 11�__ ,_ � - ... � I .".- , _11 � � � ��"._-.-:_ '. �_ I . � - * * X �.,_r.. ..�. I . 11 . 2nd AMEN U E So , ..e.� _. - - . I I1 _ I _ . &� 5f�rdg 7D �3� wrr�«l ��,�o�► � �s 7/ V *x' t; �t , t z. Z . to � s, - r i - - __-...-- - -'---- . ,�. , � _ _ _ . 4L . ,_.r v ,; x 1 .. _ �' ., �Qlr a T y. N Y -t �, - i. Y , ,v? _ = j, 1 c 7, ;,r, {. �� t `�. i �y _.t t * (w-I k ti T`- 5: 3 k f r� F ,.s-a, a at wr,z r � I �� , k ___ " �: iS . I. 6 T 7A �.-S C , , . �� < , �, �:{ s a , {, , ,� ' ..:. , 411 ',-111.11 frra . . i - . �. K ' I�.11 .-�� 111 C µT'�' r 1.. !hI. •, r 1 . .�+� Wt•; . s Y ,, , s. '1ylryc n �r - �� , . 1. '.r `� ,k t31,1 'F S k 3... T 1 Q 'w�.i y ' s Li d .r r. er-matt -R Y ' .l . X " ,. .tee.-4 ✓-� ji, :t, G T� i 4 4�_, � - } - - ,- .� ! - . y t-1 yam :. .v-rt h A . I � .. � I'_ ,-. �. > -.� _� .:I ,:. �-,.,�, :'�.*-�; ,:,.- �-,� :�. , -_�."II -,-1 Cn.TCopy , . .,2.--._ - i 4 7 "_,� '� -,'.;: - �_ . . 1-I.. �. '1� . " _-a. � _ ��..� . �.-- I -. ,� . I . �, .-, �. ;::.- I_ .,*-,. ;�,,,-.:.---,._, ,'"z,_-;��. .� -1:- .y � I � .-.I .... . I1.. -;.?,,�,-%�,,;.�,-,1,.,,-�,: ! .-.- r tI t,bqp .". . - . : -_.V a-- Uj LU Cr C0 C0 Uj DEC i 3 1995 PE��rcour�r�R r:, 1) }.. ti V - �y ��10 - .�,r 3'lS t V / }� "00, 'oe "Pee, 44 . ,�letat��vfe .�!/ .r�,s! eXe.�,,,�iw .� 041-j-/o�.cs, �lio�f, � 4114thoi/ . �. T� ,� jal6 l d e 4� I*� ,� Y 1. `" ' � .. �C'3 B� 4/nek Al'o�ctit oJ ,,Ft� '" ter. L r �. /- �j _✓ - K 'Y - E 4x Lv . tt�' . . C0 11 �; . APPROVED - DATE %L//S/97S 'a` CITY OF EDMONDS - BLDG. DEFT. r° t/ Building Official v r3�I�j,I,:�_ ,, \iR r-Iy-z _ a I O.. _� _,.�� :1 c � 1; x *J - . x v z � - .. - .•.Y : ,k_ . DATE -°12M,_ ;-- �' II DRAW`M CiG . 11_ ~'• - - . y;.G 4 ••- - � 11111 . _ - 7. .: - - - -7' - -s .� r. uv- t ' iY (STREET FILE RECEIVED JAN 2 7 20011 PERMIT COUNTER TA 5 STREET AIL RECEIVED l,Aj, t v 2 7 2004 PERMIT COUNTEP INI It ' -n A -A 7 Al. o . - t6t 4 All, r f. ? e T(k 0 T? Ai ff V-7 1.4 U, 1 u3 I k: j •'n-4. . ."� \ sue' � � '• •i 10 .4 • y.,4 rvr-�Ie 921 ..!,�R vi ---------- 0 (>� .�':�} LA•• ',.�• '.�:x. d�atppss �,\/ ....___...__.,..._. _..._ ___•-'•_........ _ ..____._._._..._._ S /• 1 )_3 �t:��l: •'rti•;,t;r � x %\\tom /.... _.. .� � � ��VJ�.._^__ �i--�� r, •. Q _- 1 ----- • • � ?"', 1:4 Z 3- ml -Y A' ir ip r r C� z. f I�T 40 lit f 1j, ki lee F / \ a, /' / p ,rw • 1 ' L ji ,:-ipn,•/,i,t°•�'=:i r`• ,•j'tl �Pi::l ,� ,'4,.1. ',l/ \ , t " J:' rr/ •' / .\ � V' / '©,,y ` � - •1 / r..' .�+1'„lt Inc,_ s r, �.•.,�;i:'��tri:• •��' �'; \ '� b► � �• 7u.t�:,-,,�(�}' 1'r�i�,+�t��!`•n?r'{.!:,.. .tJF ;— ��' i 1 / 1 \`• � � � L � :. -o '' � ity, 'afi'T4r.;�x';yr^n��,!;1�•�"'!..� l• — 1 �' / •i*.,• �. � _ _ t _. � -. •• S., _ - ' -. - t t ,• � • -7T le XP• • ti +i 14 r �� y ty 1 .Y t.,i.' . 1 1 a / . 2 li .1. � 1 . •t` �"• i , ijlir' "� w��lit ;iil�'. i��'":t'J I/,t!'=:.{ ., �!''tti, 11'' 1 4� 1d► ,1 t 9b IA AV 10 iIo_T I�z• '14 '7'1 71 PIJAI, Jill ,LFID 412 f k -7 i;)-o IrH to -k1k 4k: go tk rr ----------- I I loin It V 1M I ill IMP DJ?fti:-A.I1 0: r • - -1 " •16 S' itRO, Wke• IG Ou Pl..-!..-.�• i D - 5-1"ii A uy q --: E -! TER" ro 2 T 41Xiv 114 i'ltIT , •4 • STR .,;i, 1:4_1... A* r1UJ 1 A4�-7 j iw Pe Y 4-p Lw fit I WA 0/1 wmi 00 o M/X �� 7-Re. r1o'. RECEIVED MAR 112005 PERMIT COUNTER STREET FILE j EX. CB PP TOP=15.82 INV=12.12-8"CMP(N) S R 1 v q CB INV=12.04-8"CP(S) EX ,� \ NV=11.97-12"CP(SW TOP=13.61 INV=12.56-12"CP N; INV=12.46-12"Cs�O0INV=12.51-12"e, - - SD / �OAy / � R GON/iiV i� ��\\ R 0 L IIS•'11 ,f 6"vE i SD 0 13 r EX. CB TOP=13.61 s9 i� _ ` = ,�� __-1 SEE SHEET 2 FOR CONTINUATION ) -INV=10.81�12"CP(N) / �,� � � = '- l ��- SD ��'�l _ � M°��® 1 \ OF PHASE 2 STORM DRAIN 1 I ((( I % INV=10.81-12"CP E) / L \ 1 \\ I 1 INV=10:81_8"CP(S) � INV=10.81-12"CP(W) ^ SD/ �// 0 p'p G. i \ SILTED/FULL WATER / O\\ ----------- \- - - - - - - - - - - - 61 2 se s9 0 235'31 FILTER BARRIER AS REQ'D.,TYP. \ � 9 \ f sv � / 10, 150 STOCKPILE / \ \\ AREA / 110+ l000 lloo TOP=15.09 ,nN \ / INV=11.39-12 CP(W) \ooP INV=11.52-8"CP(N) 9 \\ \ 2 ��\ f // INV = 12.49-4"PVC(S) \ c^ \JG G \ �\ �\ oxx Ot 000l n \ \ n p 14' ACCESS AND o G PRIVATE DRAINAGE Z� �O `� I _V) / \ r EASEMENT, TYPICAL .)o -13 EX. CB TOP = 13.27 INV = 10.37-12"C E) EX. SSMH RIM = 14.72 INV = 9.97(W) SEE SHEET 2 / / \\\ / FOR CONTINUATION SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS \\ e G I Y r ATTACH FILTER FABRIC 10 POSTS WITH WIRE RINGS OR STAPLES 2"X 4"DOUGLAS FIR POSTS ® 3'O.C. MIN. 2 X 4 DOUGLAS FIR SUPPORT POST -� FILTER FABRIC - EX: GROUND NEWLY GRADED OR DISTURBED SLOPE SECTION MIRAFI 140 OR EQUAL FILTER FABRIC FILTER BARRIER NO SCALE `--EXTEND BOTTOM OF FILTER FABRIC INTO ELEVATION 4"WIDE X 4"DEEP TRENCH IF REQ'D PLAN SOLID ROUND LOCKING LID OFFSET WHERE OPENING IS DIRECTLY. OVER LADDER AND RESTRICTOR IS VISIBLE AT ONE EDGE OF GRATE NO SCALE °k \\ �.`\� FOR CONTINUATION OF PHASE 2 STORM GRAIN � t�P �:LLV. 20.00 l CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS > �, °t JJ\ \ c \\ \ `<.•`r / / ` \\ i� AREA � � ��Qj-' .'� \ GRAVEL AS / q �d �' r) \\ �� REQ'DJYP. CB ,,' , 48"DIA. TYPE 8 ELBOW W/SOLID LKG LID \ CO 6" MIN. rj CI -.---,POLYPROPYLENE STEPS NV. 11.57 .IE f _ c ROAD RESTORATION PEREX CITY,OP" EDMONDS STANDARDS \ �` .n ,�' `\ \ TEMP. INTAKE W/ / / -i•' TOP = 15.65 \\ / \ NAY 84LE FILTER INV = 7.40-24'CP(E) � h \ \ 0 : •= A INV = 7.38-24"CP(W) v ' ��`\ ;� \\`�\ �� \\ i� REO'D. y GQ / NOTE\< � / / \ G � TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE , \ � TO BE PLACED AT BARE EARTH AREAS ADJACENT T0,' \ 48"DIA. TYPE 2 PAVING IF USED AS ACCESS W/SOLID LKG LID -�� Cif JE3 \ \ \\\\ yy o y 4 4 T �i/ \ Ge j / o`�0 55 W/SOLID LKG LID EX. CBMH v+ �'i. ��sq, ,�� 20' PRIVATE DRAINAGE TOP = 15.77 '� r'�� `gyp ��-� EASEMENT, TYPICAL INV = 7.97-24"CP E) INV = 7.82-24"CP�W) �'m 1p �� 0 CIS STORM DRAINAGE NOTESCB 2 60"DIA. TYPE 2 1. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE \ � \ \ � � \ W/SOLID LKG LID / / c, RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE \\� \ �'3 O / FOR VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND FOR DISCOVERY OF POSSIBLE \ Go C� \ & 2-8"TIDE GATES/ ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. THE \ \ \ 1 ON N'LY PIPE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR FIELD LOCATION 18 `\ 1 ON E'LY IPI� 5r�$ ,��,'{ /% IS CB 4 PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONTACTED --,\ ` \\ / 11'A / / 54"DIA. TYPE 2 IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. FOR UTILITY LOCATION IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, CALL 1-800- W/SOLID LKG LID 424-5555. C 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF \\G�� "GQ QE` Q\A�' / p� 9 TOP = 18.19 EDMONDS, AND ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT. i \\c� gr`2 �6�0 �G INV = 16.76�8"CP(E) 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE \\ _ ` \ CD - CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT \\ I �^ �� 20 INSPEC110N PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. ,'..)C. SSMH 5. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE , FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL OF ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 6. 'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE NONREINFORCED CONCRETE (CP) ASTM C-14 (24" DIAMETER AND LARGER TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE (RCP), ASTM C-76) ALL PVC PIPE SHALL BE ASTM D-3034, ALL HDPE PIPE SHALL BE ADS N-12, OR EQUAL. ALL PIPE SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (REFER TO THE HDPE IS MANUFACNOTEALLOWED WITHINACITY RIGHTS -OF WAY. TIONS FOR MINIMUM OVER FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT LOADINGS) *COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR 18" OR SMALLER PIPE (O P < 1.0' REQUIRES RCP (REINFORCED I?CONCRETE PIPE) MINIMUM 1.0' - 1.5' - REQUIRES CP (CONCRETE PIPE) MINIMUM > 1.5' - REQUIRES PVC, OR HDPE *CP INDICATES CONCRETE, PVC OR HDPE PIPE MAY BE USED (SUBJECT TO COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.) RCP INDICATES REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE IS REQUIRED. 7. ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 8. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO PIE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, UPSTREAM OF THE DETENTION SYSTEM. / 9. ALL ROOF DRAIN STUBS SHALL BE MARKED WITH 2"X4" POST SHOWING DEPTH AND / MARKED "DRAIN". 10. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE TYPE I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. / 11, ALL CATCH BASINS AND INLETS SHALL HAVE LOCKING GRATES, LIDS OR COVERS. 12. ALL TYPE 2 CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE POLYPROPYLENE STEPS. 13. ALL CATCH BASINS IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE SOLID COVERS. i -_----='� 2-7/8" DIA. ORIFICti w (TYP.) n' v r Lj_-.:J 48" HDPE N STAGED F{ES'' `I,;TOi� ihJV. 11.57 DETENTION PIPE PER PLANS CLEAN OUT !I_AR GATE- / ; - w to 4" MIN -- 2'- I ' 36" HDPE FLOW __._.. _ _ _ J INV. 9.38 -- FLOW 1" MIN CLEARANCE-- - 24' 24" TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN CUT HALE 2--7/8 (JOINT LOCDAITIONT VARIES) INCH �IA. IN PLATk AND WELD TO CFPSS. HOLE TO BE SHARP -EDGED, SHOPRILLED. ! ALL STEEL PARTS AND SURFACES MUST BE GALVANIZED RESTRM'OR CATCH BASIN AND COATED WITH ASPHALT (TREATMENT 1) OR BETTER. NO SCALE !I i C 1 iTRICTOR 54" DIA.,TYPE 2 DER ELEV. 13.97 ELEV. 9.38 2-7/8" DIA. ORIFICE RESTRICTOR NO SCALE j APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION I -0 lot s / CONC. VERT. CURB &GUTTER BY: �4/QS.k'�p•� , DATE:��LI) q .,tr �\�- s so AND 7' CONC. SIDEWALK / Parcel A F CITY OF EDMONDS CITY ENGINEER '�`� 22 / REPLACE CURB CUT W/ STANDARD / I LI That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range < -- - / 3 East W M described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in 54"DIA. TYPE 2 W/RESTRICTOR & SOLID RND LID the City of Edmonds; thence west 338 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 1'18'22" E, a / distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88'41'22" W, a distance of 231.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR- 104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's Pile No. 2141566, said margin being a curve to the left having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears S 72'52'59" E; thence southerly along the arc of said curve to the left and consuming a central angle of 9'27'11", an arc distance of 82.49 feet to a point 100 feet easterly, as EX. SSMH SCALE : 1 "=20' measured radially to the L line, of liighway Engineers Station 20+00; thence S 23'25'27 W, a distance 10 0 30 of 61.26 feet to a point opposite and 80 feet easterly of Highway Engineers Station 20+68.17 P.T.; RIM=21.51 thence S 1'09'15" W, 80 feet easterly and parallel of said L line, a distance of 106.83 feet to a point INV=12.74-24"CP(SW) j opposite I-Iighway Engineers Station 21+75; thence S 44'26'45" E, a distance of 28.10 feet to a point INV=12.96-24"Cp(N) p 20 opposite I-Iighway Engineers Station 9+00 and 30 feet northerly, as measured at right angles to the INV=13.41-18"CP(N) INV=15.71-8"CP(NW INV=16.91- 4"P VC(W� ELEVATIONAL DATA BENCHMARK ORIGINATING: TOP OF NORTHWEST ANCHOR BOLT OF TRAIN SIGNAL LIGHT POLE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF DAYT❑N STREET AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN TRAIN TRACKS, DOWNTOWN EDMONDS. ELEVATION: 16.35 DATUM CONTOUR INTERVAL U.S.C. ,& G.S. (M.L.L.W.) 2 FOOT INTERVALS centerline of Dayton Street; thence S 88'41'22" E, along the northerly margin of Dayton Street, a distance of 249.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT the east 30 feet thereof for road. Parcel B That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; thence west 338 feet; thence N I' 18'22" E, a distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88'41'22" W, a distance of 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing N 88'41'22" W, a distance of 201.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR-104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's Pile No's. 2141566 and 2184033, said margin being a curve to the right having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears S 72'52'59" E; thence northerly along the are of said curve to the right and consuming a central angle of 13'15'33", an are distance of 115.71 feet to the point of tangency; thence N 30'22'34" E, along said easterly margin, a distance of 94.61 feet to the southerly margin of James Street; thence S 59'34'37" E, along said southerly margin, a distance of 185.49 feet to the westerly margin of 2nd Avenue S:; thence S 30'24' 17" W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 104.57 feet; thence S 1' 18'22" W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 7.78 feet to the True Point of Beginning. gFO��o OQ�r�O c9FGk9sr ��p SF� rry4%, \ s02 Fss 12"MIN.-•-� / 4"-84QUARRY SPALS PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE IGRADING NOTES 1, ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROL FILTERS SHALL BE APPROVED FILTER FABRICS. 3. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. 4. COMPACTION. ALL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY U.B.C. STANDARD NO. 70-1. FIELD DENSITY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.B.C. STANDARD NO. 70-2 OR EQUIVALENT AS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. 5. ALL SITE WORK MUST COMPLY TO CHAPTER 70 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (LATEST EDITION). 6. A GRADING PERMIT ISSUED PURSUANT TO CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS AND CHAPTER 70 UBC AND APPROVAL OF THE TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN SHALL HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR ANY ON -SITE GRADING WHICH IS NOT EXPRESSLY EXEMPTED BY SECTION 7003 UBC. 7. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO MEET ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE SHOULD ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE PROPOSED SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF THE RECEIVING DRAINAGE SYSTEM. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1. INSTALLATION: THE AREA OF THE ENTRANCE-&11OULD BE CLEARED OF ALL. VEGETATION, ROOTS AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. THE QUARRY SPALLS SHALL BE PLACED TO THE SPECIFIED DIMI_NSK)NS. ANY DRAINAGE FACILITIES REQUIRED BECAUSE OF WASHING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLAN. IF WASH RACKS ARE USED, THEY SHOULD BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AGGREGATE: 4" TO 8" QUARRY SPALLS. 3. ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS: THE AGGREGATE LAYER MUST BE AT LEAST 12" INCHES THICK. IT MUST EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA. THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE MUST BE AT LEAST 50 FEET. 4. WASHING: IF CONDITIONS ON THE SITE ARE SUCH THAT MOST OF THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM VEHICLE TIRES BY CONTACT WITH THE GRAVEL, THEN THE TIRES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE VEHICLES ENTER A PUBLIC ROAD. WASH WATER MUST BE CARRIED AWAY FROM THE ENTRANCE TO A SETTLING AREA TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. A WASH RACK MAY ALSO BE USED TO MAKE WASHING MORE CONVENIENT AND EFFECTIVE. 5. MAINTENANCE: THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH 2-INCH STONE, AS CONDITIONS DEMAND, AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEAN OUT ANY STRUCTURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLES ONTO ROADWAY OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE SCHEDULE 1. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2. INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN. 3. GRADING. 4. INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND OTHER UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON STORM DRAINAGE, SEWER AND WATER PLANS. 5. PLACE CURB AND GUTTER. 6. PAVE ALL ROADS AND ADD SIDEWALK. 7. HYDROSEED AS REQUIRED. GENERAL PLAN NOTES THIS MAP DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND FOR DISCOVERY OF POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR FIELD LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. FOR UTILITY LOCATION IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, CALL 1-800-424-5555. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS ANY CONFLICT OR POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICT BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, DESIGN LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITIES MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL SITE PREPARATION, CUTTING, FILLING AND UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SOILS STUDIES FOR THIS SITE PREPARED BY GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC., (TEL. 747-5618), JOB NO. 94175. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A LICENSED SOILS ENGINEER TO PROVIDE MONITORING AND TESTING SERVICES FOR GEOTECHNICAL RELATED WORK DURING CRITICAL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ROADWAYS, UTILITIES AND SITE FOUNDATION AND GRADING OPERATIONS. SEE ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN FOR ALL BUILDING, SIDEWALK AND PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS, AND SITE DETAILS NOT SHOWN HEREON. COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL UTILITIES. EXISTING UTILITY NOTE CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES IN PROPOSED NEW UTILITY ALIGNMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY SURVEYOR 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO POTHOLING. SURVEYOR TO FURNISH EXISTING UTILITY ELEVATIONS TO DESIGN ENGINEER SO THAT VERIFICATION OF ADEQUATE CLEARANCES CAN BE MADE OR ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN SLOPES, IF NECESSARY CAN BE DONE. UNSUITABLE REMOVAL NOTE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL RUBBLE, UNSUITABLE FILL, CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL FROM SITE TO AN APPROVED/PERMITTED DUMPSITE INCLUDING ALL COSTS FOR HAULING SAME. TOP=17.04 INV=13.244' INV=13.24-8" INV=13.44-12 S f\ p O A 4 tA. INV=13.44-12"(Sq WITH RESTRICTOR INV=12.94-j2W(W) -OP=16.80 �- I o NV=13.59-24"CMP(,E "� I4V=13.59-12"(N)- IVV=13:5q-- 6"PVC(S) _ UV RFLOW=15.69 CONC. WALK .' ------------------------------------------------ SD �-- SD SDi - I ' I O_______ ___- GSD C'�C� 13' Sl' 33 R - BARRIER CURB, HEIGHT VARIES ______ 94.61' _--- -- �- - a - --- ---__-------- I pFo r - -� fJ �_ su `�-- 13.0 P 12.84P x 13.20P I BLD MF a� �>FN.9 P k12.5 P 12.34P x I 12.70P >1 j 12.1op6 1 °' I I --I-- �' X 2.62P ,1 " x11.4P 12.43 g �Ng„pVC 112.58P 1j7. �-+ I 60P --�1"` EDGE OF HIGH TRqkIEAD L L A \ 1 _`_ _ 12.55f� I 12.34P PAV'T„TYP. 12.70P PER CI STD �¢Ri(11.48P 11.43P \ ��// I EDGE OF 1 13.05P I CONC.,fYP. f 11 50R. ....................... CB % �'o 'a 4o r ; .... ...............1........ 12.44P ......... ........ ..•:......... 48"DIA. TYP 2 000/ I i x11 60P BARRIER CURB TYP. ..................................................W GFADLK LID xP..............................................................::...........................0...................................................................................................................................... cci SUMP PUMP W 5A 230 DED. ELECT. U.G. SERVICE FROM ELECT. RM. TO PUMP A I. CB I I #17 8 CONN. 2 SCH.40 VC c, u� CB W/GRA ED LKG LID I I OUTFALL TO ROOF AIN oo W/GRATED LKG LID I TIGHTI_INE SYSTEM CB #10 r \ I I I `-- W/LKG VANE GRATE SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS FOR DRAINAGE UNDER BUIL�ING I L-------- _-___J_QCATE_IN GUTTER LINE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT SHOWN HEREON I I CC)NNECT-TO EX 1C I I __PLANTER---W/4'-8"CP 02%----- I L c, I r-_-- �`'..,, :•. I I co TOP =--,,17.82 x \ I IN i- 14 00_12 CP(W) I 14.02-8' CP(N) i I op L EX. CB Ej ca TOP=19.07 c? I �� ,� INV=14.57-24"CMP(W) N ..... Q� �J �/ TO BE REMOVED o x co 1\ O��p <� ,' 6' WOOD FENCE / Al > AROUND DUMPSI; /f I 7 zsy X-1 X X �z _ L xC� C) 1 14' ACCESS AND " I --------- - PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, TYPICAL FERRY HOLDING LANES _---��- ---------------- L- - I __-_- N I ' HIGH TRAFFIC LOAD / 'II .--�� D/W ACCESS PER CITY STDS. ' . SEE PHASE 1 DRAINAGE PLAN FOR......................................................r't:.:::::::.::::::.:.;................. CONTINUATION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM OOa• SEE ARCHITECTS CLANS FOR GRADES OFl AND WALLS TYP. I CONTR.�fO,eAINT P9 NT MARKINGS A r=' ' r �.� 6 j PLACE "DO Hal` ENTE SIGN-------------------------- i ® 'cv. 7'(MIN.) CONC. SIDE14A'LK, TYP. r TRANS. THK.EDGE TO VER .0 IN 5' a - C EX. CB TOP = 16,96 I P�ti�a INV = 13.61-8"CP( ) �o INV = 13.28-12C (W) INV = 13.46-12"C (E) o pq�Nchc�Cc�Re _ TEMPORARY qN (L CATION ANDAVE NU BER OF ENTTRANCE(S)ANCE MAY VARY) ` 18'x 50'x 6" THICK ss z In i� EX. SSM RIM = 18.0 INV = 15.13 INV =- 15.2 (�j) I y I I D m I 1 m I RELOCATE SON II II REPLACE CUL AT LOCATIONS St OWN / rn �' I CI�Y`STDS., TYP. \ •� I / / eyO'X 9' PARKING W w / •� e Cox" 55 / SS / TOP 18.19 INV = 16.766.76-8"CP(E) ELEVAT10NAL DATA RIM = 21.50 1 INV = 14.90-1 ' CP S) INV = 15.00-1 "CP NW) *25.2 `N 30'24i1/7" E i i sS 126.77' SD ------ CONTR. TO PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND PLACE SIGNAGE ALONG 2ND AVE. S. AND JAMES ST. AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CITY (INCLUDING RESTRIPING CROSSWALK & STOP BAR) nd AVENUE S. EX. SSMH RIM=2C.63 INV=1421-24"CP(S) & NEW 24"SS INV=1448-18"CP N TO BE ABANDONED X. SSMH EX. CBMH INV=-12"CP(NE) TOP = 20.69 F:E-CHXNNEL MANHOLE AS REQ'D RIM = 28.41 INV = 14.44-•12CP N FOR NEW 24" SS INV = 19.46- 2' CP N) INV = 14.34-12"CP�S� INV = 19,33- 2"CP S) BENCHMARK ORIGINATING: TOP OF NORTHWEST ANCHOR BOLT OF TRAIN SIGNAL LIGHT POLE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF DAYT❑N STREET AND BURLINGTON NORTHERN TRAIN TRACKS, DOWNTOWN EDMONDS. ELEVATION: 16.35 DATUM CONTOUR INTERVAL U.S.C. & G.S. (M.L.L.W.) 2 FOOT INTEFVALS TOP = 29.51 INV = 24.53-12"CP(S) INV = 25.01-12"CP(SE) INV = 24.81-8"CP(E) INV = 25.11-8"CP(W) INV = 25.11-12"CP(N) APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES OF EXCAVATION AND FILL (SEE NOTE i BELOW) EXCAVATION: ;100 CUBIC YARDS FILL: a- CUBIC YARDS NOTES: 1. THE QUANTITIES OF EXCAVATION AND FILL ARE APPROXIMATE, AND ARE SHOWN ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A GRADING PERMIT AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR CONTRACTUAL PURPOSES. SUMP PUMP NOTES 1. SUMP PUMP SHALL BE A HYDROMATIC MODEL SPD50H, 230 VOLT. 3-PHASE POWER, WITH SEAL FAILURE PROBE. A CONTROL PANEL SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AUDIBLE AND VISIBLE ALARMS, LOCATED IN AN ACCESSIBLE AREA. PUMP, PUMP DISCHARGE LINE AND PANEL SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DESIGN CAPACITY IS 40 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT UP TO 30 FEET OF HEAD. 2. THE PUMP DISCHARGE LINE SHALL BE 2-INCH DIAMETER, AND SHALL HAVE A CHECK VALVE INSTALLED TO PREVENT BACKFLOW INTO THE PUMP UNIT. 3. THE PUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED SUBMERGED, BELOW THE SUMP NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, AND SHALL HAVE A REDUNDANT OFF MECHANISM. THE SWITCH SHALL BE CONFIGURED TO CYCLE THE PUMP WHEN THE WATER LEVEL RISES WITHIN ONE FOOT OF THE LOWEST CB OR INTAKE IN THE UPSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. _ !1 FACE OF BARRIER CURB PAVEMENT WIDTH ` 51/2' HEIGHT VARIES 1 "R� 1 /2"R AQJ, TO W, Pk--,. 1 IFo wo =a 73/4" APPROVED SUBGRADE BARRIER CURB NO SCALE SEE ARCH. AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SIDEWALKS & LANDSCAPE REPLACE EX. S/W WITH 5" - -_ THICK CEM. CONC. SIDEWALK AS SHOWN ON PLAN 7' 3' f- z U CZ.h 2% w ¢ 2 REPLACE EX. CURB W/ CEM. CONC. VERT. CURB & GUTTER AT AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLAN JAMES STREET AND 2ND AVENUE S. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS NO SCALE FACE OF VERTICAL CURB PAVEMENT WIDTH 51/e" 1 "R� 1 /2"R N 113 I VERTICAL CURB I NO SCALE 60' R/W NEAT LINE CUT EX.ASPHALT AS REQUIRED ROADWAY PAVING SECT ION PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS ON APPROVED SUBGRADE SEE PLAN = -- - I� 2' FLOWLINE 2" MIN. COMP'T. DEPTH CL."8" A.C.P. PAVEMENT -�-2% 2" MIN. COMP'T. DEPTH AGG. LEVELING COURSE 4" MIN. COMP'T. DEPTH AGG. BASE COURSE G,+:"MIN. OVEREXCAVATION ASPHALT THICKENED EDGE, TYP. W/ MIRAFI FABRIC UNDERLAY AND PITRUN (5% SIEVE) BACKFILL BACKFILL ON APPROVED SUBBASE THICKENED EDGE PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE FINAL JOINT MUST BE SAW CUT OR NEAT CUT AS NO SCALE REQUIRED BY CITY ENGINEER. ALL EDGES TO BE TACKED NEATELY WITH AR-4000 ASPHALT CONCRETE TO BE COMPACTED TO A DEPTH OF (2" MIN.). (SEE NOTE *4) EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE %• :;oo< 6" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 1 IMPORTED PIT RUN OR NATIVE. BACKFILL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 95% DENSITY. (SEE NOTE *5) BACKFILL COMPACTION TO BE PLACED IN A MAXIMUM OF 12" LIFTS NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 2-09 AND 2-12 OF THE CITY OF 5. SUBMIT PROCTER AND DENSITY TESTS EDMONDS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PATCHING AND FROM CERTIFIED TESTING COMPANY BACKFILLING REQUIREMENTS. DOCUMENTING BACKFILL MEETS 95% 2. ALL TRENCHES IN ROADWAY AREAS SHALL BE DENSITY OF ASTM D 1557. TEST AS BACKFILLED AND PATCHED WITH TEMPORARY ASPHALT REQUIRED BY ENGINEER AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY UNLESS PERMISSION IS GRANTED TO DO OTHERWISE BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 3. ALL TEMPORARY PATCHES SHALL BE REMOVED AND PERMANTLY PATCHED WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF WORK WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY UNLESS TIME ALLOWED IS SPECIFIED DIFFERENTLY BY THE ENGINEER, 4. ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR ROADWAYS REQUIRE 3" MIN. ASPHALT DEPTH. PAVEMENT PATCH IN RIGHT OF WAY NO SCALE LCM LAND AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. P.O. BOX 100 EDMONDS ,WA. 98020-100 TELEPHONE: (206) 771-9118 DATUM AS ESTABLISHED BY BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP *25,1 SPOT ELEVATION BY BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP (NOT VERIFIED BY LSA) 25.2' 19.5' 17,8' (79.0'/4)=19.75'=19'-9' = DATUM 16.5' 79.0' APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY: _ �), f, . A,. - DATE: Z 5- FOK CITY OF EDMONDS CI Y ENGINEER PHASE 2 DRAINAGE AND SITE PLAN FOR EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER ASSOC. IN S.E. 1 /4 OF SECTION 23, T. 27 N., R.3 E., W. M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON 2. 12EV. PER ESLA 1. PER CITY OF EDMONDS 12-14- 1995 Gb 11-14-1995 G.B. 01-- I F F T n F 7 - SHEET 3 OF 3 SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. ALL, CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ;MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED ..BY .THE CITY OF EDMONDS 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 3. " THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 4.1 SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 8" PVC-SDR35-ASTM SPEC. D3034 MATERIAL OR CONCRETE ASTM C-14 CLASS 3, RUBBER GASKET. ENTIRE SYSTEM TO BE PRESSURE AND T.V. TESTED. 5. ALL MANHOLES SHALL HAVE POLYPROPYLENE STEPS. 6. SIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON UNDISTURBED SOIL. NATIVE MATERIAL CAN BE USED FOR BACK FILL PROVIDED SHARP ROCKS ARE KEPT OFF THE PIPE DURING THE BACK FILL PROCESS. 7. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS FOR SUCH INSTALLATION. 8. SIDE SEWER STUBS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A 2"X4" LOCATED AT THE END WITH PORTION ABOVE GROUND PAINTED WHITE WITH BLACK LETTERS LABELED "SEWER" WITH DEPTH. WATER NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS, AND ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATERMAINS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL NECESSARY EXCAVATION, BACK -FILL AND MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND BE ON SITE PRIOR TO NOTIFICATION TO WATER DEPARTMENT TO SCHEDULE CONNECTIONS. 5. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE TYPE "K" COPPER PIPE. 6. PIPE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON, AWWA CLASS 52 THICKNESS. JOINTS SHALL BE RUBBER GASKET-ED, PUSH ON TYPE, OR MECHANICAL JOINT, MEETING AWWA SPECIFICATIONS. 7. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AT ALL BENDS AND UP THRUST FITTINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDMONDS STANDARDS. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED VALVES 10" AND SMALLER SHALL BE RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVES: ACCEPTABLE VALVES ARE U.S. PIPE, CLOW & KENNEDY (250 RATING). (GENERAL PLAN NOTES THIS MAP DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 3E RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATIONS SHOWN AND FOR DISCOVERY OF POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR !DISTURBANCE. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR FIELD LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONTACTED IF A UTILITY CONFLICT EXISTS. FOR UTILITY LOCATION IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, CALL 1-800-424-5555. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS ANY CONFLICT OR POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICT BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, DESIGN LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITIES MAY BE MODIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL SITE PREPARATION, CUTTING, FILLING AND UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SOILS STUDIES FOR THIS SITE PREPARED BY GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC., (TEL. 747-5618), JOB NO. 94175. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A LICENSED SOILS ENGINEER TO PROVIDE MONITORING AND TESTING SERVICES FOR GEOTECHNICAL RELATED WORK DURING CRITICAL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR ROADWAYS, UTILIT!ES AND SITE FOUNDATION AND GRADING OPERATIONS. SEE ARCHITECTS SITE PLAN FOR ALL BUILDING, SIDEWALK AND PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS, AND SITE DETAILS NOT SHOWN HEREON. COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL UTILITIES. [EXISTING UTILITY NOTE CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITIES IN PROPOSED NEW UTILITY ALIGNMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY SURVEYOR 2 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO POTHOLING. SURVEYOR 'TO FURNISH EXISTING UTILITY ELEVATIONS TO DESIGN ENGINEER SO THAT VERIFICATION OF ADEQUATE CLEARANCES CAN BE MADE (DR ADJUSTMENT OF DESIGN SLOPES, IF NECESSARY CAN BE DONE. UNSUITABLE REMOVAL NOTE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL RUBBLE, UNSUITABLE FILL, CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL FROM SITE TO AN APPROVED/PERMITTED DUMPSITE INCLUDING ALL COSTS FOR HAULING SAME. PROPOSED BUILDING SEE ARCHITECTS PLANS FOR CONTINUATION OF UTILITIES AND FOR BUILDING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS, PLANTERS, WALLS AND ELEVATIONS L._ RELOCATE "XIST. FIFE HYD. 30' SdUTHERLY PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIRWENTS \ i 2-6" S/N,-SIDE SEWER 1� ':--STUBS R NEW BUILDING i ,' ss ABANDO1 /EXIST. 18" SS 1_r 00 w i / f w N24 P. V. C. - -`- SD -- _ N 30-2017" E i - 126.77' SD ' NEW 60" SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE W/ INSIDE DROP FROM NE NEW 24" SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE LOCATED IN EXISTING ALIGNMENT OF 12" SAN. SEWER 2nd AVENUE S. EX. SSM H RIM=20.63 INV=14.21-24"CPS & NEW 24"SS / INV=14.48-18"CP N TO BE ABANDONED zxs EX. CB INV=-12"CP(NE) i i y L z D 01 G, co n W � iTl f W W -I EX. SSMH RIM = 21.50 M INV = i5.00-18"CP(NW) m INV = 14.90-18"CP(S) & NEW 24"SS RE -CHANNEL MANHOLE AS REQ'D FOR NEW 24" SS ABANDON EXIST.18"SS SOUTH I 4"-DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY W/F.D.C.& REMOTE READ TRICKLE METER TO BE INSTALLED INSIDE BUILDING PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS 2"- WATER METER VAULT ASSEMBLY & 2-1/2" SERVICE (CONDO) PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS 1" WATER METER & 1-1/4"SERVICE (OFFICE) PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS 4" WATER MAIN W/ FITTINGS AND NEW 4" R.W.G.V. EXTENDED FROM EX. MAIN/GATE VALVE PER CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS NEW 24" SANITARY SEWER MAIN I LOCATION ROAD RESTORATION PER CITY STDS. ss -- --- --- -- ss SD O ` I EX. CBMH TOP = 29.51 INV = 24.53-12"CP(S) INV = 25.01-12"CP(SE) INV = 24 81-8"CP(E SCALE 1 "=20' 10 0 30 0 20 ELEVATIONAL DATA BENCHMARK ORIGINATING: TOP OF NORTHWEST ANCHOR BOLT OF TRAIN SIGNAL LIGHT POLE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF DAYT❑N STREET AND BURLINGT❑N NORTHERN TRAIN TRACKS, DOWNTOWN EDMONDS. ELEVATION: 16.35 DATUM U.S.C. & G.S. (M.L.L.W.) CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 FOOT INTERVALS TJP = 20.69 RE -CHANNEL MANHOLE AS REQ'D RIM = 28.41 INV = 25.11-8"CP(W) INV = 14.44-12"CP N FOR NEW 24" SS INV = 19.46- 2"CP(N) INV = 14.34-12"CPS) INV = 19.33-2"CP(S)TO BE INV = 25.11�12"CP(N) APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION REPLACED W/ NEW 24" SS / INV = 19.33- 4EW 24" SS RE -CHANNEL MANHOLE AS REQ'D i Z FOR NEW 24 SS gYBY..�� DATE: FOR &TY OF EDMONDS CIV ENGINEER I