Loading...
110 SUNSET AVE N.PDF11111111111111 13337 110 SUNSET AVE N ' CA FILE NO. 7 Critical Areas Checklist ----------------------------------- ------------------ Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 110 Sunset Avenue, Edmonds WA 98020 2. Property Tax Account Number: 4344-012-011-0009 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 7,810 sguarp feet 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? Single familyresidence 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. /e9c� 9 Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. ot6 X Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? B. Site is in the floodway No floodplain No of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ;,meadow _ :shrubs : mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) Yes 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No -. invtnCc�;o>�tin ?d�cafese261 Area 6ri situ T Q 'S;..: . 41te with desl atec earth subs�tlence �dsltde Taazard area?a% ! . . ... S1#e,designa,2ei apt the:Euvaroiixnent�Iy "u nkkAoe: Rev 10103M City of EdAnds 0 CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST e Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or ?ay be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should ,ie easily available from observations of the site or �ata available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). I Owner/Applicant: ,Albert Dykes ',Tame 3226 Cascadia Avenue S. Street Address Seattle, WA 98144-7024 pity State Zip (206) 722-3640 "plephone 1 ignature Albert Dykes -4c-?/Qq ate 1 ' reception\janz\cacl.doc Applicant Representative: Butterfield Design Group Name - 400-Dayton, Suite C Street Address Edmonds, WA 98020 City State Zip (425) 755-0564 Telephone Signature irAdley Butt field 2.i,q.99 M (over) In gc�0 February 21, 1999 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Albert Dykes 8226 Cascadia Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98144-7024 Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 99-34 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. .. .. IMPORTANT WFORMAT1011f TO: BE NOTED PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The `DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB• Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Enc: Critical Areas Determination " Architectural Design Board Thank you. Sharla Graham Planning Secretary C:ReceptionUana\CR LTR.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 11 APPLICATION for The City Of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ EASEMENT No ...................... 112-04100 OWNER.......... Ge Q1"=...Pd..g.............•------...----.........------............--•---......... CONTRACTOR---......--•------...--------••-----•------•-••----....-----•-----•------......................... PERMIT No..... .................. ADDRESS ...... 1.1-Q..Sunset-.AYE.............................................................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No............................................... BLOCK No............................................. NAME OF ADDITION ............. • a Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE................................................ By-•--•-.....---.................-•--•-------............................ 600'54'02' W 119.95 I i AREA=7,8Q5±SO.FT. n \CID BUI�.DING jot to 24,31 TACK/COLL i fi SIGNAL BASE STREET LIGHT 410 lth 51 rr-A�m x GP c\ I E,R cri /Nllf.- CONC. GTE ELEC. _ CB `L 38.46 RIM . 33.6 INV m SOIL o ASPHALT o Qo 59.9 o W N 60.54'4 W TV m NORTH FACE u q*OF BLDG. IS o c SOUTHERYLY U ASPHALT °D N OF DEED LINE Z AS SHOWN. Q H !7 --- -- — -- V a_ ik-- — OWER CI 3� 31 Q C�a ®F EDM0MOS o� 0L IN r COL • Inc 189v CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering August 9, 2001 Mr. Brad Butterfield Butterfield Design Group 400 Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR AUG 2 4 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS RE: Alley Access Waiver Request, l 10 Sunset Avenue Mixed Use Building Dear Mr. Butterfield: We have received your request dated July 30, 2001 for an alley access waiver for your mixed use building project at l 10 Sunset Avenue, and have begun our review. In order for us to complete our review and evaluation of your request, please submit drawings or diagrams which demonstrate graphically the various options you have evaluated to provide access to your project from the alley and why these options are not feasible to provide reasonable vehicle access to the property. Please accompany these with appropriate explanation. Upon receipt of this additional information, we will complete our review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 771 0220. Sincerely, DAVID K. GEBERT, P.E. City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citu - Ha.kinan..Iar)an . u 10 ♦ • , Q. . . • ..... • . .. . .. .... • .� ... ............. .. . . . .. ... ..... �..... Butterfield Design Group 400 Dayton Edmonds, Washington 98020 Tel:425.775.0564 Fax: 425.776.5746 July 30, 2001 David K. Gebert, City Engineer City of Edmonds 121 5m Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Waiver from the requirement to provide alley access for a proposed new mixed -use building. Dear Mr. Fiene: We are proposing a new mixed -use building located at 1 10'Sunset Avenue. The site is 70 feet wide by 120 feet deep with frontage on Sunset Avenue and a paved alley in the rear. The site topography rises approximately eleven to twelve feet higher from Sunset Avenue to the alley. This topographical change creates great difficulty in designing vehicle access for on -site parking. If access were to be taken from the alley side, we would be forced to create a midlevel parking area. A midlevel parking garage has many drawbacks for both the developer and the City. Thus, due to topographic constraints we are proposing access to the site from Sunset Avenue rather than from the alley located on the east side of the site. ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5) requires projects in the Downtown Business area to take access from the alleyway unless a waiver is granted by the City Engineer in accordance with the criteria found in ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(a), (b) & (c). With this in mid we respectfully request a waiver from the requirement to take access from the alley, and request permission to take access from Sunset Avenue per ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(a), (b) & (c) which state as follows: a. [the applicant must demonstrate that] One of the following conditions exist: (i) No alleyway exists which would provide reasonable vehicular access to the subject property; or (ii) Access from an existing alleyway would substantially impair reasonable access to an abutting public street or utility because df circumstances ercelpited to site size, topography or orientation; or r 0 a O� O \ 6 u!° i • July 30, 2001 Page 2 (iii) Access can be provided from an existing or relocated driveway or curb cut in a manner which preserves or enhances street parking; or (iv) Providing access from a point other than the alley would promote traffic safety, or otherwise better promote the purposes of the transportation element of the comprehensive plan. b. The application complies with all other criteria of the community development code. C. In such cases, the city engineer may then consider use of an existing common driveway or other alternative. Only when no other reasonable alternative exists for access to a property will a curb cut be approved which results in the loss of existing on -street parking. No more than one access point per lot will be permitted in the downtown business area. The city engineer's decision to approve alternative access -shall be processed in accordance with ECDC 20.95.050. ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(a) states that only one of the stated criteria must be met. We"believe our proposal is in compliance with two of the stated criteria. First, `No alleyway exists which would provide reasonable vehicular access to the subject property" Our proposal is in compliance with this criterion. Though an alleyway exists on the east side of our property, that alleyway cannot provide reasonable vehicular access to our property. The vehicular access cannot be provided due to the topography of the site. As stated earlier in this letter, the site has a fall of approximately eleven to twelve feet from the alley in the east to the street in the west. This topographical change creates great difficulty in designing vehicle access for on -site parking. If access were to be taken from the alley side, we would be forced to create a midlevel parking garage within the building. A mid -level parking garage has many drawbacks for both the developer and the City. First, a mid -level parking garage is very expensive to construct, as the mid -level floor would need to support the weight of a vehicle. This cost is significant enough to be prohibitive, thus canceling the project. Second, mid -level parking would severely and adversely affect the usability of the building. If we were to construct a building with parking on the first floor, we would propose first floor commercial uses to a depth of approximately 30 feet, with the parking behind the commercial space. With midlevel parking, the fist floor would in effect be basement commercial. Since there would be no ability to provide natural light to the rear of the building, the space would be nearly worthless. To compound this problem, we would not be able to • July 30, 2001 Page 3 provide any reasonable residential space on the same floor as the parking because the area remaining after the parking is designed is insufficient for residential. Finally, if we were to construct a mid -level parking structure, the building fa4ade would not be what the City Design Guidelines are trying to encourage. The second floor window opening would consist of some sort of grates to allow for required air exchange, not store front, office or residential window fenestration. Thus no alleyway exists which would provide reasonable vehicular access to the subject property. Second "Access from an existing alleyway would substantially impair reasonable access to an abutting public street or utility because of circumstances related to site size, topography of orientation" The wording of this section is hard to understand. However, it appears that the intent of this section is to discuss the issue of alley access being impaired by existing topography. As explained above, reasonable access to the property would be substantially impaired by alley access. The topography of the site places the alley eleven to twelve feet higher than Sunset Avenue. That topographic change substantially impairs alley access by placing the access point of the building higher than the 1:t floor of the building. As discussed above, this topographic change creates building design constraints that make the building unfeasible to construct. Thus by showing compliance with not one, but two criteria of 18.80.060(B)(5)(a), we have shown more than the minimum compliance with this criteria. ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(b) requires that "the application complies with all other criteria of the community development code." Our proposal will be designed to comply with all other criteria of the community development code such as zoning, design guidelines and building code. City reviews to determine compliance will be conducted throughout the application and construction phases of this project. Because there are other reviews required to insure compliance with this criterion prior to issuance of a building permit, and prior to issuance of building occupancy, we are assured of compliance with this criterion. Thus our proposal is or will be found to be in compliance with this criterion ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(c) requires that "Only when no other reasonable alternative exists for access to a property will a curb cut be approved which results in the loss of existing on -street parking. No more than one access point per lot will be permitted in the downtown business area. " We have shown in the text of this letter that the topography of the site has removed any other reasonable alternative access point other than Sunset Avenue. We are proposing only one access point. Thus our proposal is in compliance with this criterion. • July 30, 2001 Page 4 I believe that our proposal is in compliance with all of the criteria stated in ECDC 18.80.060(B)(5)(a), (b) & (c), and thus our request to take access from Sunset Avenue should be approved. I respectfully await your response to this request. Sincerely, 1 Brad Butterfield 1PC. 189, CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering August 9, 2001 Mr. Brad Butterfield Butterfield Design Group 400 Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Alley Access Waiver Request, 110 Sunset Avenue Mixed Use Building Dear Mr. Butterfield: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR We have received your request dated July 30, 2001 for an alley access waiver for your mixed use building project at 110 Sunset Avenue, and have begun our review. In order for us to complete our review and evaluation of your request, please submit drawings or diagrams which demonstrate graphically the various options you have evaluated to provide access to your project from the alley and why these options are not feasible to provide reasonable vehicle access to the property. Please accompany these with appropriate explanation. Upon receipt of this additional information, we will complete our review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Lyle Chrisman or me at 425 771 0220. Sincerely, DAVID K. GEBERT, P.E. City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 SistP.r Citu - HPkinan_ .lanan lnc.189v July 6, 1999 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Mr. Brad Butterfield Butterfield Design 400 Dayton Street, Suite C Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Fire Guard 45 Minute Rated Glass Block Panel BARBARAFAHEY MAYOR The City is in receipt of manufacture information provided by Mr. Bob Butterfield, on the subject glass block product. In reading the specifications I agree that the panels are rated for three fourths of an hour and may be used in exterior walls where protected openings are permitted. However, these panels may not be used in exterior walls where openings are not permitted by Uniform Building Code Table 5-A. Thus, in B and M occupancy buildings, openings for V-N and V-1 Hour construction are not permitted within 10 feet to the property line. Openings in R1 occupancies for V-N and V-1 Hour construction are not permitted within 5 feet of the property line. As stated within their own specifications Fire Guard 45 minute rated panels are fire rated window assemblies not fire rated exterior wall assemblies. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Kate Galloway, Planner Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Fire Guard' Manufactured Panels, Finally a Beautiful Solution to Fire Rated Window Assemblies. Versatility • Many patterns & sizes to choose from • CAD Design stair step and radius applications • Single panel applications up to 12 sq. ft. • Underwriters Laboratory° Classification: R2556 Fire Guard' is: • Versatile • Attractive • Pre-engineered • Pre -manufactured • Easy to install Factory Assembled Fire Guard'' windows are an assembly of glass block, mortar, ladder web reinforcing, panel anchors, ceramic fiber wool expansion joints and fire stoosealant Fire Guard' window assemblies are fully manufactured and ready for delivery. Once on site, they simply fasten into place. UL requires the entire Fire Guard' wood frame to be covered with 5/8" drywall to insulate and protect the wood from fire. This is to be done after the units are fastened into their openings. Due to the weight factor the Fire Guard' windows are limited to 12 sq. ft. Larger applications can be manufactured in sections and joined together at the job site. On -site assembly can be done for larger applications up to 120 sq. ft including radius walls. Fire Rating Facts: Fire Resistance: All sizes of Premiere &ThinLine series Pittsburgh Coming Glass Block® products in panels up to 120 sq. ft in masonry walls or 94 sq. ft in non -masonry walls are classified by Underwriters Laboratories® for use as 45-minute-rated window assemblies. These panels are usually acceptable as window assemblies for use in fire separation walls requiring one hour or less. Thickset® &VistabriO glass blocks are listed for use as 45- 60- or 90- minute fire rated window assemblies in panels up to 100 square feet Refer to the latest issue of UL® Building Materials Directory as well as your local building codes. • Underwriters Laboratory® Classification: R2556 • Underwriters Laboratories of Canada File: CR 1715 • In accordance with NFPA 80, Chapter 14 Fire Rated Glass Block Window Assemblies: Pittsburgh Coming Glass Block® products listed above have been tested and classified by Underwriters Laboratories® (ULI) for use as fire rated window assemblies to panel sizes and dimension limitations listed below. Where permitted by Building Codes, glass block fire rated window assemblies having afire resistance rating of not less than 45 minutes, may be used as "opening protectives" and to not exceed 25% of the wall areas separating a tenancy from a 2-T' wood screws @ I T' o.c. 1/4" shim space ough opening 5/8" gyp. bd. 'x' each side Interior Application Rough Opening Dimensions: Add 2 1 /4" to the nominal width and height. (Example: a 24" x 30" nominal window requires a frame opening of 26 1 /4" x 32 1 /4".) sealant by installer stucco system 5/8" gyp. sheathing'x' c o c 2-2" wood screws @ 12" o.c. Exterior Application 26 ga. ga}vd. mt.. flashing by manf On -site Assembly Fire Guard' masonry wall constr.. non -masonry walls Ratings Products Rated manufactured window (minutes) max. area per panel max. area per panel max. size per panel (FIFI) (FTI) (FT2) 45 All Patterns (except Delphi) 120 94 12 (Multiple panels can be All Sizes (except 12x 12x4) seamed together at job site.) 60 All Thickset series and Vista Brick products only 100 94 8 (except Vista) 90 All Thickset series and Vista Brick products only 100 not approved not approved • All Comer, End Block or Argue Additional products not rated: • All Pavers • Frosted Blocks I- III 1= TM GUIMID 45-Minute Rated Panel For more information on Pittsburgh Coming Glass Block call 1-800-992-5769 dPrrrSBLUMH o Your cerb fled Fire Guard fabricator: SEA Ti I.I. GLASS 12532 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98133 (206) 367-9449, 1 (800) 829-9419, Fax (206) 367-2541 corridor or a corridor from an enclosed vertical opening or one channel -type restraints or masonry chases. The use of panel fire -rated area from another fire -rated area. anchor construction is not permitted. Specifications and construction details of such panels are as per Pittsburgh Exception: Although glass block masonry units have been tested as window assemblies (not wall assemblies), they may be used as a one hour fire partition as required for corridors in the enclosure of atriums only when sprinkler protection is provided on occupied sides. 45- & 60-Minute Rated Construction: All 45- & 60-minute rated PC Glass Blocc® products may be used in both masonry and non -masonry (steel or wood stud gypsum board) walls. These rated glass block windows are framed and anchored with either PC® Panel Anchor construction or channel -type restraints.The use of a fire retardant type sealant for head and jamb locations is required. Specification and construction details of such panels are per Pittsburgh Coming Corporation recommendations. Non -masonry, fire -rated steel stud/gypsum board walls must conform to UO listed wall assembly #U465. Framing and support of the rated glass block window assembly shall be provided with double -studding with height of supporting wall limited to no more than 3 feet 90-Minute Rated Construction: Where permitted by building codes, all 90-minute rated PC Glass Block° products may be used in masonry walls only, framed and anchored with 1 /4 in. thick steel (not aluminum) Coming Corporation recommendations. Exception: In 90-minute rated glass block window assemblies, twice the thickness (3/4 in. total) of expansion material is required at head and jamb locations, as well as the use of a fire retardant type sealant 45-Minute Rated Curved Construction: The glass blocks noted under 90-minute "rating" and those 8" X 8" X 3 7/8" sized glass block noted under 45-minute "rating" are classified for use in masonry walls as curved window assemblies provided that the maximum allowable curvature does not exceed a ratio of 2:1 with respect to length of radius to length of assembly width. PC GlassBlock Products Not Fire Rated: • All 12" X 12" sizes • All Delphi® Patterns • All comers, endblocks and finishing units • All Paver block units • Frosted blocks Refer to the latest issue of UL® Building Materials Directory as well as your local building codes and officials. II 0 45-Minute Rated Panel The versatile, attractive pre -manufactured solution to 45-minute window assemblies. 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 0 • TABLE 5-A TABLE 5-A—EXTERIOR WALL AND OPENING PROTECTION BASED ON LOCATION ON / PROPERTY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TYPES),2,3—(Continued) EXTERIOR WALLS Bearing Nonbearing OPENINGS5 Distances are measured to property lines (see Section 503). OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION x 304.8 for mm GROW TYPE I-F.R. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 40 feel Protected less than 60 feet 11-F.R. One -hour N/C less than 60 feel III One -hour NR, N/C elsewhere III-N IV-1I.T. IWIhour II One -hour N/C San ic as hearing, except NIt, Protected less than 60 feel 11-52 N/C 60 feet or greater II-N One -hour N/C less than 60 feet Samc as bearing Protected less than 60 feel N It, N/C c Isewhere V One -hour One -hour Samc as hearing Protected less than 60 feel One -hour Icss Than 60 feet -' - Same as bearing V-N Protected less Ihan 60 feet NIt elsewhere I-I.I I-F.R. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C Icss Ihan 5 feel Not pcnniUcd less than 5 feel 1-1.2 II-F.R. Two-hour N/C less than 20 feel Pr(. less than 20 feet 1-2 One -hour N/Cless than 40 feel 1-3 NR, N/C elsewhere II One -hour 11vo-hour N/C Icss than 5 feet Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet 1-I.I Onc-hour N/C elsewhere NR, N/C 40 feel ur glcaler Protected less than 10 feel -1.2 — V One -hour -- 11vo-hour less than 5 feel Same as hearing Not permitted less than , feet 1-32 One -hour elsewhere Protected less than 10 feet 1-1.1 II-N 1-1.2 III-N These occupancies arc not allowed in buildings of these construction Iypes.7 1-2 V-N 1-3 Group I. Division 3 Occupancies are not allowed in buildings of this construction type. -3 WIFE 1-I.I III One -hour Four-hour N/C Samc as bearing except Not permillcd less than 5 feet 1-1.2 NR. N.'C 40 feel or greater Protected less than 20 feet 1-2 1-3 _ Not permitted less Ihan 5 feet IT, IV-11:1'. Four-hour N/C Same as bearing except 1-I 2 NR. N/C 40 feet or greater Prulecled less than 20 feel 1-2 II One -hour One -hour N/C Same as hearing except Not permitted less than 5 feel NR, N/C 41) feet or greater Protected less than 10 feet 1-2 V One -hour One -hour Same as hearing Not permitted less than 5 feet Protected less Ihan 10 feet -F.R. Four-hour N/C less than 3 feel Four-hour N/C less than 3 feet Not permitted less than 3 feel II-F.R. T1vo-hour N/C elsewhere Two-hour N/C less than 20 feel Protected less than 20 feet III One -hour One -hour N/C less than 40 feet III-N NR. N/C elsewhere IV-1l: r. II One -hour One -hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permitted less than 5 feet NR, N/C 40 feet or greater R I II-N One -hour N/C less than 5 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feel NR, N/C elsewhere V One -hour One -hour Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feet V-N One -hour less than 5 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less than 5 feel NR elsewhere -FR. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 3 feel Not permitted less than 3 feet II-h.R. Two-hour N/C less than 20 feet Protected less than 20 feel III One -hour One -hour N/C less than 40 feet III-N NR. N/C elsewhere II One -hour Clne-hour N/C Same as bearing except Not permilled less than 3 feel R 3 NR. N/C 40 feel or greater 11-N One -hour N/C less than 3 feet Same as bearing Not permilled less [hall 3 feet NR, N/C elsewhere _—VOn,-hour One -hour Same as bearing Not permitted less than i feet V.N One -hour less than 3 feet Same as hearing Not permilled Icss Ihan 3 feel NR elsewhere (Continued) 1-57 • TABLE5-A 0 • 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE 5-A—EXTERIOR WALL AND OPENING PROTECTION BASED ON LOCATION ON PROPERTY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION TYPES1,2.3--(Continued) EXTERIOR WALLS - OPENINGSs Bearing INonbearing Distances are measured to property lines (see Section 503). OCCUPANCY GROUP4 CONSTRUCTION TYPE x 304.8 for trim I -FIR. One -hour N/C less than 10 feet Same as bearing Not permitted less (him 5 feet II-P.R. NR, N/C elsewhere Protected less than 10 feet 11 One -hour IFN3 S-4 III One -hour III-N IV_I I.T. Group S, Division 4 open parking garages are not permitted in these types of construction. V One -hour V-N I-RIt. Four-hour N/C Icss than 5 feet Four-hour N/C Icss than 5 feet Not permitted less than 5 feel IFER. 'I\vo-hour N/C elsewhere 'l\vo-hour N/C less than 20 feet Protected less than 20 feet III One -hour One -hour N/C less than 40 feel Ill-N NR, N/C elsewhere I V-113'. II One -hour One -hour N/C Same as hearing except NR, N/C 40 Not permitted less than 5 feet feet or greater Protected less than 20 feet - S-5 II-N3 ---- -- One -hour N/C less than 211 feet -- .. — --- Same as hearing Not permitted less than 5 feet NR, N/C elsewhere Protected less than 20 feet V One -hour One -hour Same as hearing Not permitted less than 5 feel Protected less than 20 feel V-N3 One -hour less than 20 feel Same as hearing Not permitted less than 5 feet NR elsewhere Protected less than 20 feet -F.It. Four-hour N/C Four-hour N/C less than 3 feet Not permilicd less than 3 feet 11-{.R. Two-hour NA: less than 20 feet Protected less than 20 feet III Onc-hour One -hour NV less than 40 feet 111-N NIt. N,V elsewhere II One -hour One -hour N/C Same as hearing except Not permitted less than 3 feel U-13 NR. N/C 441 feet or greater V One -hour One -hour Same as hearing Not permitted less than 3 feet 11-N2 One -hour N/C less than 3 feet3 Same as hearing Not permitted less than 3 feet NR, N/C elsewhere V-N One -hour less than 3 fce13 Same as hearing Not permitted less than 3 feet NR elsewhere — U-2 All Not regulated N/C— Noncombustible. NR —Nonrated. 11.1—Ileavy limber. F.R. — Fire resistive. ISee Section 503 for types of walls affected and requirements covering percentage of openings permitted in exterior walls. For walls facing streets, yards and public ways, see also Section 601.5. 2For additional restrictions, see Chapters 3 and 6. ;re� 3For special provisions and exceptions, see also Section 503.4. 4See Table 3-A for a description of each occupancy type. AovildA. SOpenings requiring protection in exterior walls shall he protected by a fire assembly having at least a Ihrce-fourths-hour fire -protection tali . ' 66roup E, Divisions 2 and 3 Occupancies having an occupant load of not more than 20 may have exterior wall and opening protection as required for Group R. Division 3 Occupancies. 7See Section 308.2.1, Exception 3. 1-58 • • GLASS • FIRE -1-Ta Lk FACTS0 : • WALL ASSEMBLIES • WINDOW ASSEMBLIES Published by Pittsburgh Corning Corporation to l GLASS BLOCK FIRE RATING FACTS: SUMMARY. Ambiguous and potentially misleading infor- mation on glass block fire resistance has been dissemi- nated to architects, interior designers, owners, builders andnatip code bodies. he facts are t at all Underwriters Laboratories (UV) fire -rated glass block on the market are tested in accordance with UV9 (Fire Test of Window Assemblies for a 45-minute or longer period. All national building codes recognize t 's test. '"`Tt "wrndowassem f6W00 `f6ftec) on glass block do notqualify glass block products for use in wall assemblies. Presently, no glass block are qualified as fire -rated wall assemblies because none can pass the UV wall assembly test. Product Fire Resistance Versus Published Data When designing a building, there is probably no greater concern by architects, designers and owners than that of fire. The fire-resistant characteristics of construction materials under consideration play a significant part in their specifica- tion and ultimate incorporation into a finished structure. Of particular concern is the possibility of specifying a fire resistant product or equal when, in fact, the product has not been subjected to testing for the specific application or recognized by the major building codes. Thus, accurate representation of fire -rating data is of criti- cal importance. Ambiguous or misleading information which results in the specification or use of an unqualified product can have serious consequences. These could range from costly engineering change orders, replacement of an already installed product, to costly, time consuming lawsuits. Of even more importance is the potential for serious injury or loss of life in a fire due to failure of the product to achieve the intent of the codes. Compounding the problem of vague product data is the fact that even code officials and building inspectors must often rely solely on manufacturer -supplied test data. While the appropriate installation of a product frequently can be visually ascertained during inspection, the behavior of a product under stress, i.e. fire, must be accepted at the "face value" of a manufacturer's reported product test results. ASTM & Underwriters Laboratories° Most of the materials testing performed in this country, and even in other parts of the world, is based on test methods developed by the American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM. This independent body's standardized testing procedures are created through technical committees of volunteer, expert representatives from all phases of industry. But, while ASTM develops the tests used to measure product performance for comparative evaluation, it is independent organizations, such as Underwriters Laboratories°, Inc. which perform these tests in an unbiased manner upon a manufacturer's request. Glass Block Wall Tests Versus Window Tests Of specific concern in this report are the ASTM tests for "wall assemblies" and for "window assemblies"— ASTM E119 and ASTM E163, respectively; and Underwriters Laboratories® application of the window test, "Standards for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies, U09 p°-,,— The differences in the ASTM window and wall tests are of critical importance, and, as might not be immediately apprec- iated, the standards for walls are much more stringent than those for windows. Table 1 presents these differences: TABLE 1 WINDOW/WALL TEST DIFFERENCES Wall Assemblies Window Assemblies (ASTM E119) (ASTM E163, UL 9) Measures transmission Does not measure of heat transmission of heat To pass, requires that the Does not measure tempera - temperature increase on tures on the unexposed side the unexposed side not exceed 250OF above its initial temperature To pass, requires no Does not measure passage passage of flames or gases of smoke or products of hot enough to ignite combustion combustibles To pass, no openings may Allows up to 30% through develop that allow water openings in panel, which may to pass through during the therefore allow water to pass hose stream test during the hose stream test Unlike the wall assembly test which measures a material's integrity, stability and thermal transmission, the glass block window test only determines the ability of the assembly to remain structurally sound, that is remain in the opening for 45 minutes or longer. As Table 1 shows, the window test does not measure the assembly's contribution as a fire hazard, its unexposed surface temperatures, or its limiting affect on the passage of products of combustion through the assembly. Basically, the window assembly test consists of exposing a panel to a fire under controlled temperature conditions in a furnace. The panel is removed from the furnace after 45 minutes or longer and immediately subjected to a standard water hose stream test to determine impact and thermal shock effects. A glass block window assembly passes if at least 70% of its glass block do not develop openings through both faces of the block. A significant fact to note: Today, there is no glass block product, of any composition or design, that can provide the fire resistance characteristics of a wall assembly; and there is no glass block product that will pass the ASTM/UL° test for a wall assembly. The dataobtained from the window assembly test obviously does not compare with that for a wall —and acceptable results for one test offer no basis for compliance with the other. In spite of the fact that 45-, 60- and 90-minute, fire -rated glass block do exist, architects, designers or building owners could be misled into believing that these glass block would be acceptable for fire -rated wall assembly installations. In reality, the test results carry no implication as to qualification of these products for use as a fire -rated wall assembly. In summary, the ULI� window assembly tests performed on all glass block —including Pittsburgh Corning's—do not qualify these products for use as fire - rated wall assemblies. And, secondly, higher fire -rated glass block are not "more qualified" for wall applications than the 45-minute-rated glass block. I It is suggested that the prudent course for all architects, designers and building owners is a very careful examination of any fire -rating claims. Use of Glass Block In Wall Assemblies: The Only Exceptions This information should not be interpreted as totally excluding glass block from incorporation into those wall assemblies required to have a 1-hour fire rating. Over the past serveral years, Pittsburgh Corning has worked closely with the major, national code bodies to qualify the use of minu e - onger-rate ,gad—f ssbTockopening "protectives" in i-nour-rateo wail assemoues. Table 2 presents the major building codes and their paragraph references allowing rated window assemblies TABLE 2 CODES ACCEPTING 45-MINUTE OR LONGER GLASS BLOCK "WINDOW" IN 1-HOUR WALL ASSEMBLIES CODE YEAR PARAGRAPH BOCA National Building Code (Building Officials & Code Administrators) 1996 2118.1 Standard Building Code Conference International, Inc. (SBCCI) 1994 704.2.1.4 Uniform Building Code - UBC (International Conference of 713.9 (Vol. 1) & Building Officials) 1994 7.407.2 (Vol. 3) Helping You To Make An Informed Choice It is regrettable that potentially harmful confusion has clouded the serious matter of glass block fire resistance. Suffice it to say, at present there is no one glass block product that exhibits a superior ASTM/UL® rating and thus qualifies as a wall assembly. It is hoped that this report from Pittsburgh Corning Corporation will give you cause to question all glass block fire -ratings. In the final analysis, you have to make your own glass block specification decisions. But, Pittsburgh Corning believes that now you will be able to make a more informed choice. Fire Resistance All sizes and patterns (except products not fire -rated) of Premiere and Thinline- Series Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products in panels up to 120 sq. ft. in masonry walls or 94 sq. ft. in non -masonry walls e'� a classined by Underwriters Moral ries° for use as45-minute-rated window assemblies. These panels are usually acceptable as window assemblies for use in fire separation walls requiring ratings of one hour or less. THICKSET° and VISTABRIK® block are all listed for use as 45-, 60- or 90-minute fire rated window assemblies in panels up to 100 sq. ft. Refer to the latest issue of UV Building Materials Directory as well as your local building codes. • Underwriters Laboratory® Classification: R2556 • Underwriters' Laboratories of Canada File CR1715 • In accordance with NFPA 80, Chapter 14. Fire Rated Glass Block Window Assemblies Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products previously listed have been tested and classified by Underwriters Laboratories° (UL°) for use as fire -rated window assemblies to panel sizes and dimension limitations listed below. Where permitted by Building Codes, glass block fire -rated window assemblies having a fire resistance rating of not less than 45 minutes. mgv g used as "open protective-" and to not exceed 25% of the wall areas separatg act tenancy from a corn od r or a corn or from anm -'tc o`sed vertical open- ing or one fire -rated area from another fire -rated area. Exception: Although glass block masonry units have been tested as window assemblies (not wall assemblies), they may be used as a one hour fire partition as required for corridors in the ,Pnclosure of atriums only when sprinkler protection is provided on occupied sides. 45- and 60-Minute Rated Construction: All 45- and 60-minute rated Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products may be used in both masonry and non -masonry (steel or wood stud gypsum board) walls. These rated glass block windows may be framed and anchored with either PC® Panel Anchor construction or channel -type restraints. The use of a fire retardant type sealant for head and jamb locations is required. Specifications and construction details of such panels are as per Pittsburgh Corning Corporation recommendations. Non -masonry, fire -rated steel stud/gypsum board walls must conform to UL� listed wall assembly#U465. Framing and support of the rated glass block win o3"w assembly shall be provided with double -studding with height of supporting wall limited to no more than 3 feet. 90-Minute Rated Construction: Where permitted by building codes, all 90-minute rated Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products may be used in masonry walls only; framed and anchored with 1/4 in. thick steel (not aluminum) channel -type restraints or masonry chases. The use of panel anchor construction is not permitted. Specifications and construction details of such panels are as per Pittsburgh Corning Corporation recommendations. Exception: In 90-minute rated glass block window assemblies, twice the thickness (3/4 in. total) of expansion material is required at head and jamb locations, as well as the use of a fire retardant type sealant. 45-Minute Rated Curved Construction: The glass blocks noted under 90-minute "rating" and those 8"x 8"x 37/8" sized glass blocks noted under 45-minute "rating" are classified for use in masonry walls as curved window assemblies provided that the maximum allowable curvature does not exceed a ratio of 2:1 with respect to length of radius to length of assembly width. Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products not fire -rated. • All 12"x12" sizes • All Delphi° patterns • All HEDRON°, ENCURVE°, AROUETm Block, Frosted Block—VUE° Pattern, TRIDRON 450 Block° corner and EndBlockT1 finishing units • All Paver Units. Refer to the latest issue of UV Building Materials Directory as well as your local building codes and officials. • Fire Ratings Pattem ARGUS® SIW Nominal/Actual (mm) PREMIERE SERIES (4"/37/8", 6"x 6"/53/4" (146mm) ❑ 45 Min A 60 Min O 90 Min 98mm ❑ Masonry Wall Construction Non -Masonry Wail Construction Channel Framing/ el Anchor Framing ❑ Max Area /Panel (1111 thick) 120 Max Nt or width (it) 12 Max Area /Panel (ttg 94 Max Ht or width 0 10.75 8"x 8"/73/4" (197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 12"x 12"/113/4" (299mm) OECORAO 6"x 6"/53A" (146mm) ❑ A 120 Ole 120 10.75Z ❑ 8"x 8"/73/4" (197mm) si.. 120 12 94 10.76 0 12"x 12"/l13/4" (299mm) 4"x 8"/33/4"x 73/4" (95 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.76 ❑ 6"x 8"/53/4"x 73/4" (146 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ ESSEV AA 8"x 8"/73/4" (197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ VUEO 6"x 6"/53/4" (146mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 8"x 8"/73/4" (197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 12"x 12"1113/4" (299mm) 4"x 8"/33A "x 73/4" (95 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 61'x 8"/53/4"x 73A" (146 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ OECORAP "LX" Filter 6"x 6"x 4"/53/4"x 37/e" (146mm, 98mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 8"x 8"x 4"/73/4"x 3ys" (197mm, 98mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 12"x 12"x 4"/113/4"x 3Ye" (299mm, 98mm) 4"x 8"x 4"133/4"x 73/4"x 3Ye" (95 x 197mm, 98mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 6"x 8"x 4"/53/4"x 73/4"x 37e" (146 x 197mm, 98mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ THICKSET® BLOCK DECOR/ ENDURA" & VUE® 8"x 8"x 4"/73/4 "x 3ye" (197mm, 98mm) ❑ A o 100 10 94 ❑ 0 10.75 ❑ 0 0 •, THICKSET® BLOCK DECORA® & VUE® 6"x 6"x 4"/53/4"x 37/e" (146mm, 98mm) ❑ 0 O 100 10 94 ❑ A 10.75 ❑ A O'' VISTABRIKO Solid Glass Block & Stipple Finish CIRRUS® 81x 8"x 3"/7%", 3" (194mm, 76mm) 6"x 6"/53/4" (146mm) ❑ A o ❑ 100 120 10 12 94 ❑ 0 94 10.76 10.75 ❑ 0 ❑ 8"x 8"/7W (197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 6"x 8"/53/4"x 73/4" (146 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ DECORW 6"x 6"/53/4" (146mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 8"x 8"/73/4" (197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.76 ❑ 4"x 8"/33/4"x 73/4" (95 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 6"x 811/53/4"x 73/4" (146 x 197mm) ❑ 120 12 94 10.75 ❑ 'Size —Block are manufactured to a t%, e" (2mm) tolerance. Metric size Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block products are also available. Please contact Pittsburgh Corning Corporation for further information. "Channel/Panel Anchor Framing —Panel anchor framing construction is not permitted in window assemblies for 90-minute fire ratings. For answers to questions or to obtain additional copies of this brochure, please call the Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block Products Hotline at 800-992-5769. Or write Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Technical Systems, 800 Presque Isle Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15239. ARGUS°, CIRRUS-DECORAo, DELPHIa ENCURVE-, ENDURA®, ESSEXe, HEDROWo THICKSETo, TRIDRON 45- Block•, VISTABRIK* and VUE® are federally registered trademarks and EndBlock" Pittsburgh Corning Glass Block" logo and THINLINE' are trademarks owned by Pittsburgh Corning Corporation. UL• and Underwriters Laboratories° are registered trademarks owned by Underwriters Laboratories®, Inc. PITTSBURGH ■� CORNING_5 M • • • Printed in U.S.A. GB-209 15M Rev. 4/97 • GA3.> 4 Z 3 ?' @aoel4osle4' find 4'Afa. a6wt- 45 M�n.ri/ B/oc�C e6� erad a Nrr�' A*7 ym**7 draS/ew., •.4��vcd Stab/t 8� �inr/Q� dam! �G. LINE RECEIVED JUN 2 9 1999 CrIS %Vrr IMV OF EDM0SEll%ACTN 7A"0/ 1%ter � � 0 RECEIVED JUN Z 5 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Pre -application meeting February 5, 1999 — 9:30 a.m. Applicant: Butterfield Design Group Site Address: 110 North Sunset 1 Sunset Condominiums Attending: Representing City Staff: Ray Miller, Gordy Hyde, Jeannine Graf, Lara Knaak, Kate Galloway, Rob Chave, John Westfall, Conni Curtis. Representing A,pplicant: Brad Butterfield, Steve Butterfield, Al Dykes Planning: (Kate & Rob) • Rob indicated that project is BC Zone. Asked if ground floor is on Sunset. This was affirmed by Applicant. Per Rob, the BC section says development on ground floor must consist of only commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30 feet and the exception is the provision of pedestrian access. Applicant stated he believed it was for automobile access also. Applicant sent letter with plans to the Engineering Division and to John Bissell on June 16 and got responses from them before they purchased the property (distributed copies of the letters). When they did this, they showed him that, for vehicular access, they planned to do just like what was done on the building next to Claire's where they have vehicular access and a parking garage — 24'wide on the ground floor. Applicant had gone through this process showing that they were going to have both vehicular and pedestrian access into their building to access the parking garage and what was left would be the 30-foot office space. Then again on October 14, they reaffirmed with Jeff Wilson of the City (with the plans and drawings) that this interpretation was correct. Kate indicated that the drawing originally submitted has the full 30 feet, while on the drawing Applicant submitted this time, there's about a 10-foot section that's 30 feet. Applicant stated that they have modified from that original drawing and, if they have to go back to it, they will. He felt that the question now is the vehicular access on the front of the property. Kate stated that there are actually two parts — there's also a question on the commercial portion because the way it reads in the code is 30 feet in depth. Applicant agreed that it is 30 feet in depth. Rob stated that what the letter says is if that's the only possible access, then that's the situation they're left with. Applicant stated that it is the only possible access. Rob stated that Planning is alerting them that it's something the City is going to have to look very, very closely at to make sure that it's the only access, because essentially what this is, is a multi -family condo and not a mixed -use building. The Applicant replied that this is why, in June, before they spent 428,000 dollars on the property, they came to the City and went through this, and before they made their final payment in October they went to Jeff Wilson saying if the City has a problem with this, they need to know before they write their checks. Rob stated that if we have to allow the access up front, we have to make sure Applicant is providing the most commercial frontage they can to still be within the intent of the code. The Applicant stated they have to do two things — have a drive aisle that's a certain minimum width and a pedestrian access and what's left is commercial. The other problem is that they're adjoining an RM site, and lost 15% of their property. Otherwise, their commercial would go all the way over to the 60-foot lot. Per Rob, what needs to be explored is how can Applicant maximize street frontage commercial space. At the end of today's meeting, a time will be set up for Applicant and Planning to meet and discuss. Page 1 Pre -Application Meeting February 5, 1999 Butterfield Design Group/Sunset Condominiums Building: (Jeannine) • A shoring plan is required, to be prepared & stamped by PE. • Be sure to check all occupancy separations. B to S3 requires 1-hour; B to Rl requires 1- hour; S2 to S3 requires 1-hour. • Stairs need to be enclosed. • Elevator lobby or additional door required. • Egress on first floor must be an exit passageway; check UBC 1006. Also check what is permitted to open into that exit passageway. The elevator and the pump room now as designed would not be able to open into the exit passageway. • Allowable area calcs. Check the half diagonal distance for exiting. • If you do provide the A-3 media rooms, you need air, light and ventilation. • The den in Unit 301 and the dining area in Unit 302 look like they are shy of minimum light and ventilation so you're going to want to double check those. • Must make a complete application for submittal. Fire: (John) • Access doesn't appear to be a problem; we're within our 50-foot range. • Fire flow sufficient with an approved sprinkler system. • Adequate hydrant coverage. • UBC standard 9-1 system for the first floor, which is a 13 system; 9-3 for the remaining floors, which is the 13R. • An alert on the headspace in the parking area, regarding the dry system and/or insulating the wet system for parking area. • The 13R (residential) will apply only if no other modifications are made to the Uniform Building Code for allowable area increased and such; no exceptions are made for that. • Sprinklers over 100 head require electrical monitoring; no automatic fire alarm is called out. • Manual fire alarm will be required in the corridors, both on the way at the exit doors. • Emergency lights throughout, exit signage, fire extinguishers. • Sprinkler systems will require 3 sets submittal — hydraulic calcs, plans, specifications for the equipment involved. Engineering: (Gordy) • Site plan required, signed by professional civil engineer, with emphasis on storm management detention requirements in accordance with ECDC 18.30. • Request and granting of waiver for alley access, as opposed to the street access as indicated in my letter in June. • Require 24'wide access on the front, and would prefer to see 20' landing no greater than 6% - you're showing 14% basically from the edge of the right of way. Need waiver for above 12% that could be granted by the City Engineer. We do want to see a 6% landing. • Traffic plan (can be included within your civil) indicating parking configuration, your aisle width, your driveway slope, width and cross section as well as frontage improvements. • Traffic report with trip generation, level of service analysis and trip distribution at Sunset & Main, Sunset & Bell, Main & Third, Sunset & Dayton and Main & Fifth. Page 2 k . Pre -Application Meeting February 5, 1999 Butterfield Design Group/Sunset Condominiums Ray asked if the Applicant had any other questions. Applicant asked about the buffer zone (15' landscaped buffer zone). The code says they can go three feet into setback, but because this is a BC property, they're showing their ground floor patios larger than one third. It's not officially a setback — it would be a landscaped area. How would City interpret the code? It's not really a setback because there aren't any setbacks in the BC zone — it's a landscaped buffer zone as is shown on their last sheet of plans. They are also going to use that for exiting and some hard surfaces and don't know how to address that. Rob indicated that Staff will check to make sure. Applicant asked about up above, second and third floors, where they are coming out five feet on their decks but are still ten feet off their property line — non-combustible surfaces. Per Jeannine, that's permitted. We then returned to problem we first discussed regarding access from Sunset. Per Rob, that the letter says if the alley access isn't going to work, we have to allow Applicant to provide access and the only other alternative would be Sunset. That being said, Applicant must still go back to the intent of the zoning ordinance, which is for mixed use. The problem is that not only do they have the access on the frontage, but are also cutting off even more by coming behind the commercial space. Applicant asked if we had to "strike a compromise", how would they proceed — go back to original submittal? Rob stated that yes, they were showing commercial frontage all the way back, for starters. We need to know if that is the only feasible way to provide on -site parking. Can they provide a little more usable commercial space somewhere else in the building to really get more toward that mixed use? Rob set up review with staff for Wednesday, February 10 at 11:00 a.m. He asked that applicant show an effort to provide more commercial space. Also, if they want it to be a mixed -use building, it should say it is a "mixed use building" rather than "condominium building" on the plans. Also, in order to get access off Sunset, they need to address the alley issue and get a formal decision/waiver. Page 3 n c C. 1S01 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering RECEivEo April 21, 1999 A PR, 2 6 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Brad Butterfield 400 Dayton Street Edmonds, WA 98020 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of Alley Access Requirements —110 Sunset Avenue Dear Mr. Butterfield: Waiver of the alley only access requirement can be granted for 110 Sunset Avenue North. The requirement is waived for this site because of the topography that precludes reasonable access for the disabled from the alley. One access point from Sunset Avenue North will be allowed for this development. Please call me at (425) 771-0220, Ext. 327, if you have any questions regarding this decision. Sincerely, 2'�/ / /JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer JCW/cmc c: Raymond Miller, Development Services Director Jeannine Graf, Building Official ✓ • Incorporated August I1, 1890 • C:Vvfy Documents\Engsx\pEVELOP1110Sunsecdoc C:,.X—n:— TT..t.v.--.- T---- 400 Rx QW7074 MW -� 8()20,i;,% A A'o rX �r err Thank u.for meeting• -with ka•y:Miller afid:mytdfflthis morning our;-.'-, )tbje tI 0 'Stihset Av6ride-.'-_-f6ll6Wirij &6 tfib.discussed reasons why' -we'-", - o our. property.:aU 'Unset-- Avdi hue fi'66d46hid6laraccessA Steep`north,46 s6tAh;tlo pf-the 'alley: : and the� ... Due:tp the fairly, '4" ,developme nt of 7adjoining` ii6ighbos,'propert ould'r6quire -`6 y SU 'brade of. the. alley td-accoMmodate:vehicu vehicular -access t bs'tantial re grade -access. o.our ,'.,­, from the a ey. -., e-gr adVdrsqly'impact` ll"`R' , adifi§the'a ey.would Y jr ` -;_� :� "';','adjoining properties and in fact woprobiibly.wouldn't 66 granted: permission to do so; as� evidenced ey recent: projects denied juit S4 requests, recently td'bLir;building`af8�6nse* :2`YA -fided ADA pedestrian access this _dirddlyrelates to oui,AbA-v6hidular-6c'c'es'­s from" Sunset`AV6n­eand qj ADA pd-tking requir 'a ,4 .. "' ' ts for th6'buildin'g...:Ou'r's'ite.p"I-zin',., S' -..our e en .,submittdd; fuAhee tefe6ii''this qesign�, roue to 466:dramatic Ee*`St/'Wdst_4': of -th `p'io06fty(±12),�;d alle�jo -Suns& Avenue,- can-* no - slop t", `access Kii *ghodt ih6--b , t rou ui Me.will. have only one, access/to our, prope y,,., ,pyrentcu cut-p I i g nt y. n orth, - We.,-:' , "'r'' . ug.elgqeOt�'parKng�.,jherewill6Hdidheredcnth-6V6r�lb Ae iz a vt,�j ' • cari n,,.,, a t! c - of th ecial Chapter 12.1.C. Az! t I o n t Crite—ia 071 I*aTlc 2 Ckt Planning Pcpll.-,:.-.e7lt: or HONE APPLICANT:A. Indicatc. t y I c, o= inter,:St ;n t1i, II'T _Pea-& 12---ji-rL92 PMbAl()51; . ........... cj:� C:I;) 1, APPROVi,'D usi; J,y G -T(O/j PLC- c Aj (z /477Z(�Wlev on a Vicinity of tj��, pf,:, 1.11' f- -, j.;:p, ((!>!i ":ing Lill t plall b" pmpo�:vd), (on;"tin� ond zlrjja�.ellt !;trcct.;. 1110 to on ;fort}, Fd4X7AJa- PZ-,','.AJ A77-,dCi-W- ,_: _ _AL_: — "Ina, �ow I , --7z ----------- -Z I WADZ HAmproN JAMRS ARCH�TWCT m , m I f CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Page 2 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. f COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I On this date, before me, the undersigned, a :rotary Public in and for the State of ashington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared e&Z;%- zzG" ? (.c �• , who., being duly sworn, on his/her oath eposes and says That f's)he has prepared and read the foregoing statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this / day y ' �% Y of � ,E �s. c. _ _, 19� i NARY PUP67, in and for, the State of Kashin tcn, ...siding at Edmunds. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA Section 12.16.100 Variance.:: Condi'tionz Appl.ic,-.tions. Procedures. The Board of Adjustment shall have the authority to c*,rant a variance from the requirements of this Ordinance, after considering the matter at a public hearing duly called, riving notice a, provided herein. A. The standards and criteria for the Board on .4aplications for variances shall be as follows: 1. In considering all proposed variances to this Ordinance, the Board shall first determine that the proposed variance will not amount to a rezone and constitute change in the district boundaries shoran on the Official Zoning Map; 2. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land such as size, shape, topography or location, not generally applicable to other lands in the same district and that strict enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties similarly; situated in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance; 3. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; 4. That there are unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties which render it difficult to carry out the provisions of this Code; 5. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; 1 6 That 6je reasons set forth in the .application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land; 7. That the granting of the variance will generally be in harmony and compa- tible with this Code and in particular the applicable zoning classifications in Chapter 12.13, the intent express d in such classifications and the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edmonds, and will not be injurious to the net-hborhood. or otherwise -istrimental to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare in such factors as noise, sanitation, traffic, pollution, erosion, vibration, physical hazards. B. The 'fact that the property may be utilized more profitably will not be an element of consideration before the Board of Adjustment. raosweme�a�� '_ n CITY OF LDWDS APITICATIV FG! WWANS.: Papa 3 a prc'�;cril)c appro- B. In tt-;y tho Doi­c! IT, I,' . �11 pria : to '-Ind t of 'I j,_ thal tAT Pa C,-n � �­, �: �;. 11 (-,; � this ordinanm vn,tl nut J,Cr r.io' 0, " C 4.1. F;11c!I -,.ondlition:; wixil w):r tit, Variance is granted, Hall th:,s I,,- ILIar Section 12.16.100, "i annities". n", ry of Findinrs of race W Bonrd W Adjustment .... . ..... 'Me msc: of Of f,, n, Cj" f EdmWds find: in for vorianc, at the following: ,,Jvol, "CC". rd and Affidavit.'; Ottcstini-, art: j,, -;:�! fiJ('. 2. L lCortJ1 S'�07-II-1712"I'- ;111r1 hzIvC/haIvC."()t hec!rl 1(1('" fox V.11daricc :;lTbj,2ct to thc following C o; 16 1 i r a b,jj,jnM permit and/or occyanQ pcmdt is not' S i:;. ia ..and . i- 7 fn I ! �J oo(; ycov Jr(,:I1 th,! io v - C Q J 1)(, j!t:toT1I,3":icJJJy 1IT113. dcc:sL i ,.; J tile.! 0! 1 t i., L i. c,: I �i J1 U 4'C"Ltive. L)oci:_ion b, ef, 4.1 Chairman. Boa d of Adj Mfnl-lilt DATA I � 1; ­'r;IJ: ua% 0hearing: Date 0 ', 5 p C Uwe of Polwation:__ continuances: Date Of DLIte Of Appcal. ; Decision of the Board:. ---------- lIZZIRry, board oi TKI—t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIiCATION STATE OF WASHINGTON I ss COUNTY OF SNOHONIISH THO.IAS J. COAD, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is the Publishes of the EDMONDS TRIBUNE -REVIEW, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and has been designated as such by Court Order No. 38282, and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publi,.:ations herein- after referred to, published in the English languaCe continually as a weekly newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of _ IVOTIi�I'(3I''1�„Ag said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication PETITION.FOR,VARtANCE/ of said newspaper, ar)d that it was of general circulation in said Snohomish CON DI1 WNAL USE PERMIT " All,; interested -persons; County --- — --- -are hereby, i;otifled that 'Monday, ---_._ That the annexed is a true o-)py of the .25•day. of March, 1974, has been set as the date fo r hearing petition for: variance use permit to Reduce no; of 1..•3rking spaces as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement forn',of said news - at 105:Main St.'said property being zoned BC �, paper once each week for a period of .._ �G �n©—�C94DS9C]itx�C weev., . Said hearing will b2 at 8:00 commencing on the 13_ d---.-- day of — Itiareh- 197� P.m. in the, Council Chambers of the Civic. Center, Edmonds, and ending on the ._,—___— day of ----_— _--- --. 1 J —, Wishington, before the Board of both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its ,:ed;ustment, and all interested subscribers during all of said period. Thab !.he full amou..i of the fee charged persons are invited to MORAN appear. IRENE"VARNE. for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which amount has City Clerk, been paid in full, at the rate of $_ 2__0.0 a hundred words for the first insertion :.. City of'Edmonds 'File No. V-12-74 .: and ._......-.._. a hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Published: 3.13-74-9N ! � Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3,t);1.. day of ._S•'L�4L1 ,.___, 19 74, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at. Edmonds, Wash. 14 CITY of EDMONDS Civic Cen;er Edmonds. Woshington 98020 • Tt:lOPhc;nn (206) 775525 Cr��'e of City P!ann;ng ^larch 11, 1974 George B. Paige 110 Sunset Avenue Edmonds, Nashington 98020 Mr. Paige: In accordance with RUN 42.30.080 (Open P4eeting Law), this is the required notification that there will be a specially sche- dulA meeting of the Edmonds Board of Ad.iustment, April 1, 1974 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Comonds Civic Center. The special meeting is required because of the length of the agenda originally scheduled for the rQgular meeting, March 25, 1974. This agenda has heen divided and will he heard at two meetings. Your application has been set for April 1. CITY OF EO'1011DS e L E. JOSEPI4 WALLIS City Planner peh March 2.0,, 1974 T0: Chairman of Boaru of Adjustment RE: Variance 12-74 Building permit #720419 was issued by -the City after review of the parking lot layout and approval of parking spaces for nine (9) cars. The building permit was apprc-ed and a certificate of occupancy issued when -this r�qu?rement had been met. Sub- sequent investigation revealed that the City had not specified the correct number o:F spaces required, overlooking a space for the residence, and a total of ten (10) spaces for the 50 X 40 feet building based on one (1) stall for each 200 square f+let of building area, rather than the nine (9) specified on the approved plan. The applicant has submitted a revised plan of the parking areas and has provided space for a total of ten (10) cars. A definite hardship will exist for the applicant in this case. I. Topography of the land will require extensive grading and rockery or retaining wall installation. 2. It is my understanding that a sewer line would need to be rs outed. 3. The City erred in parking lot requirements. It is my recommendation that the variance be granted. /' If �tte Harry Whitcutt Buildina Official �O'al:ril�LL": �a(Li�.il�� rlf`•�'.i�a��/a!p�� ',: .. ... r ` _ �„tda. t.,,i�u� ...:•.:`'1 � c: _ G:,c.'Yx�� n.i :I �!p r..t t•� ::J I r * : •� , .• I ���. -.2�( r"O►r'2-/�-rh% G.� ',.-i�r1•L�,b {:�v �-t`Zt :CT � :,��p �%v� _�4�i�•�M� C:.f? rr{Ssff f' nt.i 1 ✓ i !� � ` 4 ' .. ; r1�- f h f ryi�l Y �'^IV4tK'� it T '%.rt� _+.•(, { 9 f 71 » r vy: �` ,t t 2_y,yW ep ri � 1•+ � I 4��r+�� { Y 7dY .JGq �J�eYG b,.s p J4p+Nrs`� � r�.�r' �+5_ ' � � v y 'r"� ; � nl t�i• 1� v :�• .' L, ! =•� n� �. .4:.t .'" Fc,.. � �,/i d.I r:,• �....f;-, n5. r;. ,-.. � N�� t4�" -N ��n ��a}„+,� WAD Z RAmprox JAMZS AIrCHiTZCT rk^ CITY OF EDMC A,'�*"'CATIOW TO BOARD OF ADJUST r File No. V-.1S-7.1 EDNONll3, wAS ON FOR VARIANCE Date -j- 7-A FROM REWIR MENTS OF ZONING ORDIN Fee• ySr^,5.00 Realt. No. (Please refer to Official Zoning Ordinance, City of Hearing Date L 1477- Edmonds, with special reference to Chapter 12.16, , Administration. Note Standards and Criteria on Page 2 �`f'""` �`�'-��^` Qua 9, 7z- of this application. Copies of Ordinance available at Planning De par XIent or Public Library.) APPLICANT: ADDRESS: f%D' �rSTr PYkPEONE: Indicate pe or degree ,gf,i terest in the propertyi OWNER: ADDRESS* )/V -415 f ) an PHONE:� 7 LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDR:S3 : / C, - /&A f /y. S LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:" LO7- rNe': NCI-7- GOB of .LOr /2-, &-oCC _LEGI�ESCRIPTION_CHECIMD.& APZPOVED.., _. - 1jn ZONE - L---- - By Planning Dept. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIMMENT : SEA t'/o u 17-1 E . 7 on , 'c'�: ,1 Cc i .� e" �1 .r —7 Lac c I c wr 'astir. VARIANCZ REQUESTED: STATMENT OF CONDITIONS AND RZASONS FM R,rQU'ZST, IN ACCC•FDANCE WITH 9T.WDARM A'•'D CRITERIA ATTACIi`sD: ``• 2 avt�n " Aa a, ,�T e..e r.�'/+?a ,., • v � .� •/ i''1;...:- arc _J.e4at o-. SFP.TCq: Show below or attach a Vicinity Sketch of the area per exaople on reverse side. Shoar also a plot plan, of tho subjuct property, inlicatirg all buildings (o::istirg and proposed), sottacks (existir_; and proposed), and adjacont streets. Plot Ilan Fha*LL be drawn to an indicated scale. Indicate North on both szetches. If s'.satchee are a.ta.clied, Please raubml.t nine copies. 2 z Q U� zoo Tal 5umzrr BEACH 2K ------ .. — Ntw Lcrnnou a OF 7',Y6"-c f1L•411 1N TgVZ&V SAIL-W c 7nvER!„ 2� //)/IlN ' R&E7 Signature of Owner Ili i CITY OF EDNONDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in aTj d for the _�tatp. of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , who, being duly sworn, on his/hew oath deposes and saw that (-s)he has prepared and read the foregoing statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me t,iis V.Z' day of r� NO ARY PUBLIC,!/in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA Section 1.2.16.100 Variances: Conditions Governing Applications: Procedures. The Board of Adjustment shall have the authority to grant a variance from the requirements of this Ordinance, after considering the matter at a public hearing duly called, giving notice as provided herein. A. The standards and criteria for the Board on Applications for variances shall be as follows: 1. In considering all proposcd variances to this Ordinance, the Board shall first determine that the proposcd variance will not amount to a rezone and constitute change in the district boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map; 2. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land such as size, shap^., tapography or location, not generally applicable to other lands in the _a..e district and that strict enforcement of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by oth-jr properties similarly situated in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance; 3. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; 4. That there are unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties which render it difficult to carry out the provisions of this Code; 5. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated; 6. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variancea that will make possible the reasonable use of the land; 7. That the granting of the variance will generally be in harmony and compa- tible with this Code and in particular the applicable zoning classifications in Chapter 12.13, the intent expressed in such classifications and the Comprehensive Plan for -the City of Edmonds, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare in such factors as noise, sanitation, traffic, pollution, erosion, vibration, physical hazards. 8, The fact that the property may be utilized more profitably will not be an element of consideraticn before the Board of Adjustment. 1 � CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE_ Page 3 1 B. In ,ranting any variance, the Board of Adjustment may prescri:;e appropriate j conditions and safeguards that will ensure that the purpose and intent of this Ordinance shall not be violated. Violation of such conditions and safe- guards when made part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Ordinance and punishable under Section 12.16.160, "Penalties". Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Adjustment 'Vt he Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of File No. V.a 5 7a , request for variance at / D _�Z the following: 1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are in the file. 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met. 3. In addition thereto, 4. Therefore, the request for variance ise0egri,9&�Franted, subject to the following special conditions: S. Section 12.16.1.10 "---and if a building permit and/or occupancy permit is not obtained for the subject property within one year from the date of the Board's decision, the conditional use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void.---". 6. Decision shall be effective on: 9 Dated t�n� Cha r an, Board of Adjustment DATA Date of Application: �- 7 Date of Hearing: Date of Publication: _If- / L - -% uZ Continuances: Date of Posting: 1- /O- 7.. Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board: Secretary, Board of Adjustment • • r "r�C-lam k 11A AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH , THOMAS J. COAD, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is the Publisher of the EDMONDS TRIBUNE -REVIEW, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and has been designated as such by Court Order No. 38282, and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications herein- after referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, and that it was of general circulation in said Snohomish County That the annexed is a true copy of a--No$iae of Hearing -- pet_j_tj_Q Fi l a N() ... _V-25 T? — "'"=`%'' as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said news- NOTICE OF HEARING `�,iR,X PETITIONI+'OR ft paper once each week for a period of _ _Q© week VARIANCIr'/, commencing on the _bth— day of I3u_ust All interested?°persons ;:Rre hereby;; twtifier, thatr;Monday; and ending on the -- day of — —, 19-1 the.26th;dayof Augusti';1972i has;;'. ,,.,. •, is'the,.date:for het�ring both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its beezt set h;petition';.for vallAllCe1 of-300.}; subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged :feetafrom:the regaiied 500 ft: Sec�.,12,13i20Cyat,110 for the foregoing publication is the sum of$ 2+j� which a ount has distance;! {' Sunset`Ave: said propertg being been paid in full, at the rate of $?_� 00_ a hundred words for the first insertion zoned BC -t`Said`heanng vvitl":be at 8i00. p m {n the:Coune'fIocll Chambers of and $ a hundred words for each subsequent insertion. the C,�tcr Center., Edmonds, , — Aju tinneent b�iid' all interested. personVare:in�jted';to`„appear.,.. 16th, August lg 72 Subscribed and sworn to before me this ay of _ � IRENE VARI� EY MORAk, . Clerk; 7 City of EtLmonds FJe No .V 25-72 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds, Wash. Published 8.16-72 - 36C AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) CYRIL CAFFIERE, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: THAT on the day of y—�- the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applicable, on the property or alor..:'. every road or street abutting the subject property and properties adjacent thereto. DATED this �— day of 19 � day of _&'' 4. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this Q�_17 NOTARY PUBLIC ID and for Snohomish ounty, Washington, residing in F�tnes�s • Q�Lf" .4 IN E OF PUBLIC'HEARING QT.1 C NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC BEARING WLT-1. BE HELD BY THE EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMEK AN APPLICAT110'2 14 HAVING BEEN FILED FOR ... .......... 500 F- ... af ........ ..................... ... r ......... .......... T.H.4 ....... 4M9 ........ F.:n ....... .. R.. .. p.................................................. . ............ t ....... ..... ............................................................. .................................................................................... . ...................................................... f0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS...........®.... ...... 5......... y Ice........... .... . .................................................. E 0 a (140, ..... **** ... )­****­".'.­­­ .... ** ... **'... ­* ..... *"*"**"*"** ..... "**"*** .......................................................................................... % .9 .......... 6 . . ..... P i ............................. ............................. ..... ........ . . . . ............................................ ........................ ................................................................................................................................. ZONECLASSIFICATION: ................. . ............... ................................... ., -THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS APPLICATION WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET, BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AT, 8:00 PX:_ M-ow-0 A -I a ----------- ----------- A_aas -- r ------ Z-1 -------- 191WA. DAY DATE ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUP- PORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE PR 6-1107, EXT. 27). PUBLISHED...-....... f7ZA� ..... 7.-.4 ....... FILE NO. ............. The removaL mutilation, dedraction, 1k I or concealment of this notice is a WARNII'mv. misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. im t"�;' f: LLF oc >1 rn �. La v a 2 0 U- 1Tl.- U M O 4 $. '0 00 00 O c 3 0 p v 'T1 Lri O y O p [ >+ Lt� H s. O N w �o u �o p M0 0E0` ON" CD Q� za C , .0 'a 0 >,.Lr) . O -.� V �__[ / NEV'eW'4s � Ac_ To PA2�C t' 13Y A p2 i' V D/°�Ni.0 lr ' C2vs wA-z� For the best value for For the best value for y rnting o prill ca Your printing g dollar call Distinctive color printing Distinctive color printing Lynnwood, WA 98036 LW S.. 6925 216th St. S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 6925 216th St. Y (206) 775-6665 (206) 775-6665 VCHICOLAr2, IWACIES AT MAW TN62p mre. Z woJl. D eAn+ BE OVE12t_y CAOTiOU.S . . fir✓ a °CWMATION CITY O EDMONDS J1V ` r'T CNIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASNNGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 ; THIS,N,4MBERMUST APPEAR ON ALC INVOICES, ,: 'PACKAGEt" BILLS OF LADING PURCHASE REQUEST INVENTORY REQUEST 9WORKREQUEST AND'CORRESPONDENCE: CHIP TA 7i N D O ZIP CODE R IF IONE NO,'- _ VENDOR NO. JDOCUTTTAQ ORDER ,D TE,--`_'... , _ BATH* DATE-: 55 PLEASE FURNISH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: S S S I UANTI UNIT CATALOG DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL COST M NUMBER COST ' i ESTIMATED •. ' ACTU/tt,, A d /9 ,e At c. A P,! #a .e AL C S� ,0 0 4 4i , �u ,L yv ¢ S Tioi+.r REQUESTED BY: CODE ,PPROVED BY: 1 010, y = 7` c 7L a ?" Ao t. J- 74o- r - Sv •� r e- �Y • �.. e r o Jf - Q % r SUBTOTAL'" 1 OTAL AMOUNT l PROJECT .. AMOUNT 'ESTIMATE.'. I _ .;'..; ACTUAL _. �� �( TOTAL AMOUNT ' ' t �- ATE RECEIVED S PERMIT Asa CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE S ;7'0060 NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION SUITE/APT# A D ADDRESS D Saks ek A N OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS uAj\ne PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. N:� L Y1 jf LID FEE $ ¢ 2 MAILING ADDRESS (� e ✓� PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved Q RW Permit Required 11 o Street Use Permit Rsq'd 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required 0 Sdewalk Required 0 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground Wldrg requked NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ rg 2 W = 2z ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE ¢ z W 0 4;;l CITY' ZIP TELEPHONE G 3 NAME _ 1✓��te rfw,ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE , 0 ¢ 0 _C41 LA1t� y l —(/ ADDRESS FIRE REVII1416 BY \} Vt DATE ¢ CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Z ¢ O U LL VARIA E OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY I REQ' POSTED ❑ YES O SEPA REVIEW SIGN ARE HEIGHT PROP Y TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. COMPLETE EXE ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED W 3yy-t��- l-�� 2 I • � EXP �V F NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRON U DE REAR COMPLIANCE OR AlfIDE k AUDITION COMMERCIAL ❑CHANGE OF USE ' ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN r z a PA KING REQ'D R VIDED LOT AREA P I VIEWED BY DATE " ❑? REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS (EN�QIgIINKT) R ARI S ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ® R s �� kulm `� ` ZO GARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL ❑, CARPORT //'�� /) r- abf Z( I. I0. (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: &ECKED BY TYPE OFFONSTRUCTION OCCUPANT , liq a L w GROUP O NUMBER OF NUMBER OF DWELLING CRITICAL AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT O STORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED ❑ YES LOAD DESCRIBE WO TO BE DONE REMARKS , F 5 c7 PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D c m e Gnc.t e s kS C'�' i. 1IQAA IF f tA VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO: ` VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. i STATE SURCHARGE ¢ PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS W a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION N APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE W IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING i EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE ¢ ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE RECEIPT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT = NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEIPT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This apVJication is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her 4eputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIA SIGN URE DATE SIGN O R NT) DATE SI NED (425) � g 9 771/0220 RELEAS BY D � ATTENTION EX7l 333 OR OCCUPY IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW - INSPEC OR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER • GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98