The URL can be used to link to this page

110 W DAYTON ST.PDF11111111111111 13613 110 W DAYTON ST ADDRESS TAX ACC( BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRU( COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: G .TION: ❑ Conditional Wader ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc 6 ADDRESS TAX ACC( BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): F.J 6/( 6-d COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): oC C1C✓.�( PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DA Z SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: : GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: LOT: BLOCK: L:\TEMP\DST's\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc CITY OF EDMONDS ® NEW • ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET ASSET NO. 00 ADDITION TO TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION '5'tfW Lp G mow. SERIAL NO. LOCATION DEPT. NO. 1 (0 , S/ o **PURCHASE ORDER NO. _ PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST *PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 10 COST 3 G 7. 3s- B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. oco - o/ C/ - 3 ��^ -c,o • (0 3 • ESTIMATED LIFE Z INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY **SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY STREET FILE K P ❑?` DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT • G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. INITIAL lbll DEPARTMENT FILE CITY OF EDMONDS ASSET INFORMATION SHEET NEW • ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET NO. ®o <,// �-, / ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION iC i$ SERIAL NO. N DEPT. NO. rCA�16 9 C! o *"PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST *PROJECT NUMBER 4) 3,j ..5� / 2 / PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. 'tZ ��OC'o' - 4>1 V -39'.s 1 tea' 1 6-3 ESTIMATED LIFE 26' INITIATED BY DATE **SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST e *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY 19 DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT _ • G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE VERVI E7BY,r�"�r�,.. PROCESSED BATCH NO INITIAL by DEPARTMENT FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 51HAVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 890 �g4 CERTIFIED MAIL April 4, 1991 Seafirst Bank 110 W. Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Problems with venting of your plumbing fixtures Dear Resident: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR ST9FFTFiCF The City's sewer cleaning records show that the home at this address is experiencing problems with the venting of some of your plumbing fixtures when the City crew is conducting cleaning operations of the City sewer line in front of this address. The City's cleaning operation is essential for both you and your neighbors. It cleans debris in lines to prevent plugs, prevents corrosion and potential future collapse, and achieves a better flow characteristic in the public sewer lines. We need to do this often -- perhaps even 3 times a year -- in some critical areas. The City's cleaning operation typically involves the utilization of a high pressure water jet. The problem which occurs at the home is the result of a high pressure surge through your internal plumbing system. A properly constructed plumbing system is designed to easily vent this additional pressure without any visible impact at your residence. An undersized venting pipe (or not having enough vents) cannot handle the pressure surge, and the only release that's available is then through your toilet (or another fixture). The Uniform Plumbing Code typically requires a 2" vent, and further requires a separate vent for each plumbing fixture which is connected to the sewer (a toilet, a sink, a shower). Your home clearly does, not have an adequate venting system (you either have a 1-1/4" vent, or not enough of them), and you therefore may continue to experience the pressure surges. The City does not have a choice as far as discharging its responsibility in cleaning the public sewer line. It is therefore up to you to take corrective measures as to how to properly vent your own plumbing system. The City has come up with two options that will remedy your problem: Option 1: Upgrade stack vents for toilets and other fixtures which are experiencing problems to required sizes. e I;uOrparafFd Au.cjusi 111 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Page 2 Option 2: Install a clean -out outside of house per attached specifications. Enclose box so it can vent properly when excess pressure is put on house lines. This option would be the cheapest and simplest way of correcting this problem. At the same time, it would allow access to sanitary sewer lines if stoppage should occur. This vent clean -out would allow a place for backup in lines to go before entering your house and causing costly damage. The City would appreciate your expeditious cooperation in this matter. The City must continue proper maintenance of its sewer lines, but we obviously do not wish to see continued problems occurring on your property because of poorly designed vents. It is your responsibility to correct these deficiencies. We cannot keep notifying you each time we come out to clean the line. It's up to you to have a plumbing system that conforms to code. Option 2 is a relatively simple one to construct. Should you have any questions on these options, please call Everett Akau, Scott Highland or myself at 771-3202, extension 317 or 318. Sincerely, Ron Holland Water/Sewer Supervisor Enclosure SEWERVEN/TXTSEWER .- SOOT- S+e-c7 MA4--.--,Pt(S (I) x 4 -PvC- P,(Ak(roAsve") (a� x y" PV C 9 5' ;3a 0 'I I I h s r'lot 7( �Plby C*►p pvc 9-, 3/.t8/qI IAf D,i It 31 t. i'e. A -3I-A. k 1, X VLq ►Mew fboK -- y 5.— c Ferr c , C�ONJT Pvc p\uc� %SAP fXe-s"5 Air 0 ti BUILDING PERMIT REVIEZJ /ia a ess t Street Right -of -Way Existing ,O,L-WA4Z- REQD Access Easements Existing <LO-' REQD H a Utility Easement Existing READ w Lot Per Subdivision Plat Assessor Map w Site Plan Checked for Accuracy -- z Underground Wiring Reqd. qXO H Check Accuracy of Legal Description z Review by Date w Existing Water Main Size ' Water Main Required Service Line Required Hydrant Size Existing r %• ' x Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code Size w i Detector Check Meter Reqd. Cross Connection Inspection -- Fire Department Comments - 3 Water Meter Charge Regd.`'' Review by Date Septic Tank Design Approved //Z/j Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Al 15, Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability Pro. j Drawing No.. , File No. Side Sewer Availability w Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd. 3 Review by Date w Open Ditch Existing Reqd. Culvert Reqd. _ARUtI I� /lr f�141 �� zQn iJ x Catch Basin Regd. 1 < < Indi6a'te on Site Plan O Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff E-+ 1) Manhole regd..,► c Indicate on Site Plan Soil Condition,, -and Ground Wa Jr Field Checked �--` Review by <-� Q o ,Date -5 / Revised: lv10-1977 DATE: 7 MEMO TO: Building Division Planning Department FROM: Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: /0 -Z&— J� r 71V j After review of the subject Building Permit application, we have the following comments: 1. Connection to City water system required. 2. Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. 3. Right-of-way permit required for any work on City property. 4. Driveway slope not to exceed 14% 5. Backwater valve � required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. * — — 6. Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7. Builder/Owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion on site --and may not impact neighboring properties in any way_ I r1i Y,13LIC WORKS DT?PARTT"EN11 �~ Single Family BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW Multiple X Commercial BUILDING ADDRESS a � 7L "BLDG. DEPT. SUSPENSE DATE INITIAL DATE ':20UT-E []OFFICE ADMIN. — PUBLIC WORKS LOG IN [:)CITY ENGINEER (check) ❑ Access Slope and Vehicle Access ❑ Drainage Plan []Street File ❑ Legal Description ❑ Quit Claim ❑ Easement ❑ Calculate Sewer Connection ❑ WATER/SEWER DIVISION ❑ Determine Meter Size ❑ Complete Building Permit Review �— • ❑STREET DIVISION []Complete Building Permit Review —� []OFFICE ADMIN. — LOG OUT TO BLDG. DEPT. ie�i�it��a®a®i�o�ie®cmi�i®e.�e�i�i®i�u®ucm gn ®i®o�ec�moIea= c=p D-'BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (COMPLETE) 0-11COPIES OF SITE PLAN_ ❑ 2 COPIES OF FIRE PROTECTION PLAN (PREVIOUSLY REVIE11ED BY FIRE DEPT.) � Z ❑ 3 COPIES OF DRAINAGE PLAN 14ITH CALCULATIONS REQUIRED BY SUBDIVISION ❑ (/ GREATER THAN 2,000 SQ. FT. IMPERMEABLE SURFACE ❑ LESS'THAN 2,000 SO. FT. [] 16 ❑ CHECK ZONING REQUIREMENTS (SETBACKS) I ❑-�/1•"COPY OF ENGINEERING: CHECK LIST 1 u;Y COPY OF PUBLIC WORKS MEMO MULTIPLE OR COMD ERCIAL YES ❑ (.ATTACH COPY OF ADB APPROVAL INCL. ALL DR ,TINGS� /l N 0 SUBDIVISION — YES ❑ NAME DATED RECORDED NUMBER NO (ATTACH COPY OF REOUIRY-2, :NTS) H]CK SEWER DRAWING AND ATTACH COPY u IS DEDICATION REQUIRED —YES OBTAIN NO %j CITY CODE ) I Computer ID #1 • ,r BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY TEST REPORT RETURN NO LATER THAN RECEIVED J U L 1 3 1992 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. NAME OF PREMISES -• &4660IL 50AA4 I,= CONTACT PERSON SERVICE ADDRESS LOCATION OF ASSEMBLY It >. oHr SG!! 7'� �/Z.S— ro fhy ASSEMBLY -- F-/-/3 t d cFO,` y I � C as 7/ MANUFACTURER MODEL SIZE SERIAL NO. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST 1,20 LBS. TYPE OF ASSEMBLY D. C, Reduced Pressure Assemblies Pressure Vacuum Breaker Relief Double Check Assemblies Air Inlet Check Valve I 1st Check 2nd Check Opened at psid psid Valve Initial DC -closed tight Closed tight Opened at U ❑ Test Did not open Leaked RP- psid Leaked ❑ _ psid Leaked U Repairs and Materials Used STF?EET i Fj E Test After DC -closed tight t! Closed tight ❑ Opened at Opened at Repair RP- _ psid psid psid _ psid AIR GAP INSEPCTIO REMARKS: ired minimum a7geparation provided ... Yes _INo J7-tC-1 THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TOB,F TRUE: INITIAL TEST PERFORMED B REPAIRED BY �d /o CERT. NO � , DATE — DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY CERT. NO. DATE Removal Action Plan Harbor Square Complex. Edmonds, Washington July 8, 2004 Prepared for Port of Edmonds Edmonds, Washington 1 I ANRIAUA ANN()( 1AI IS 130 2rid AVt?'1L:- 50! i*h Ed rn o, i U Ut 425'i 770-09" TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1-1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND 1-1 1.2 SITE HISTORY 1-2 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNED REMOVAL ACTIVITIES 2-1 2.1 REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES 2-1 2.2 PRE -MOBILIZATION ACTIVITIES 2-2 2.2.1 Excavation Area Survey 2-2 2.2.2 Photodocumentation of Conditions 2-2 2.2.3 Permitting 2-2 2.2.4 Public Notice 2-3 2.2.5 Health and Safety Plan 2-3 2.2.6 Manifest Documentation 2-3 2.3 MOBILIZATION AND SITE PREPARATION 2-4 2.3.1 Protection of Existing Site Features 2-4 2.3.2 Definition of Work Zones 2-5 2.3.3 Truck Loading Area Setup 2-5 2.3.4 Truck Decontamination Zone Setup 2-6 2.3.5 Personnel Decontamination Zone Setup 2-6 2.3.6 Subsurface Utilities 2-6 2.4 IN SITU SOIL EXCAVATION 2-7 2.4.1 Excavation Staging and stockpile sampling 2-7 2.4.2 Verification Sampling 2-8 2.4.3 Material Loading 2-9 2.4.3.1 Truck Loading 2-9 2.4.3.2 Truck Decontamination Procedures 2-10 2.4.3.3 Dust Suppression 2-11 2.4.4 Material Transport 2-11 2.4.4.1 Truck Manifests 2-11 2.4.4.2 Route of Site Egress 2-11 2.4.5 Disposal of Stockpile Material 2-12 2.4.5.1 Truck Decontamination 2-12 2.4.5.2 Recordkeeping 2-12 2.5 SITE DEMOBILIZATION 2-12 2.5.1 Truck Loading Area 2-12 2.5.2 Equipment Removal 2-12 2.5.3 Site Egress Route Restoration 2-13 2.6 BACKFILL OF EXCAVATION AREA 2-13 3.0 FIELD DOCUMENTATION 3-1 4.0 REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT 4-1 5.0 SCHEDULE 5-1 6.0 USE OF THIS REPORT 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES 7-1 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 11 LANDAu ASSOCIATES LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Plan 3 Proposed Soil Excavation Areas 4 Definition of Work Zones 5 Cross Sections A -A' and B-B' 6 Proposed Verification Soil Sample Locations LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Title A Health and Safety Plan ' B Field Documentation Forms 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 111 LANDAu AssocIATES 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This removal action plan (RAP) describes activities to be conducted to excavate in situ soil located at the Harbor Square complex in Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington (Figure 1). The site addressed by this RAP occupies approximately 1 acre of the 13-acre Harbor Square complex in the 100 block of West Dayton Street. The site and other lands on which the complex is located are owned by the Port of Edmonds (Port), and leased to Harbor Square Associates (Figure 2). This RAP addresses two areas (Remediation Areas I and II-1) that are scheduled to be excavated to varying depths in the summer of 2004 in order to remove petroleum -impacted soil (see Figure 3). Previous remedial investigations have established that free -phase petroleum product and/or petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in excess of 2,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) were identified in soil samples collected from these two areas (Landau Associates 2004). Excavated soil exhibiting. free -phase petroleum product and/or total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations in excess of 2,000 mg/kg will be transported to either a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D-permitted landfill or a thermal desorption and disposal facility (disposal facility). The removal action will be completed under the provisions of the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) voluntary cleanup program (VCP) agreement between Ecology and the Port. The removal action will commence following Ecology review and approval of the plan described herein. The remainder of this introductory section provides information on the project background and the site history. 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND In 1989, the Port retained Landau Associates to perform an investigation to assess environmental conditions at the site. The investigation identified two areas of petroleum contamination at the property: an area along the western edge of the alley northwest of buildings at 180 and 190 West Dayton (weathered diesel- and motor oil -range TPH) and an area just east of the building at 180 West Dayton [tar -like material containing petroleum hydrocarbons, carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs), and benzene]. Landau Associates summarized the findings of investigations conducted from 1989 through 1995 in a remedial action report (Landau Associates 1999). The remedial action report established a site within Harbor Square and requested the issuance of a No Further Action (NFA) determination from Ecology for the site. The site consisted of the area immediately around Buildings 1 and 4 of Harbor Square where soil impacts were known to exist, but did not include other portions of Harbor Square. The NFA was issued by Ecology in correspondence dated September 17, 2001 (Ecology 2001). 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc I - I I.ANDAuAssocIATES Petroleum material, similar to Bunker C fuel oil, was discovered in 2001 in a storm sewer manhole at the site. The manhole is approximately 50 ft from the area just east of Building 4 at 180 West Dayton, where tar -like material was identified during the 1989 investigation. The source of impact to the manhole and the discharge area at the point the storm sewer manhole discharges to the Edmonds Marsh were addressed (Landau Associates 2002). The NFA was rescinded by Ecology in correspondence dated April 1, 2003 (Ecology 2003). In June 2003 and April 2004, Landau Associates conducted supplemental remedial investigations to further delineate the petroleum contamination at the site. The investigations included the advancement of soil explorations and the collection of groundwater samples from several existing monitoring wells positioned downgradient of Area II-1 and the northern portion of the site. Soil explorations and groundwater monitoring locations for each investigation conducted to date are shown on Figure 3. 1.2 SITE HISTORY In 1994, GeoEngineers; on behalf of Unocal, developed a site history summary (GeoEngineers 1994) According to the report, the Union Oil Company purchased the site in 1920 and sold it to the Port in 1978. Activities conducted at portions of the 120-190 West Dayton Street site during Unocal's ownership, which are identified on Figure 2, include the following: • Unocal owned the subject property from 1924 to 1978, when the Port purchased the property. • 1924 to 1940s: Unocal operated a fuel storage and distribution facility (Dayton Street Depot) on the northern part of the property. In later years, Unocal leased portions of the property to several entities. • 1948 to 1963: General American Transportation Company (GATX) operated a rail car cleaning and maintenance facility on the northern and western portions of the site. • 1958 to 1968: Joplin Paving Company operated an asphalt batch plant on the eastern portion of the site. Lease provisions included disposal of asphalt and hot mix residuals outside of the lease area, but within current site boundaries. • 1961 to 1963: Tri-City Sand and Gravel maintained sand and gravel stockpiles and operated a rock crusher on the eastern and southeastern portions of the site. • 1963 to 1985: Roy Allen stored earthmoving equipment and construction and building materials on the northern -central portion of the site. • 1968 to 1978: Site use unknown. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 1-2 LANDAu ASSOCIATES The eastern and southern portions of the site were filled with dredged sand and gravel from the construction of the Port of Edmonds marina and possibly other sources in the early 1960s. The Port purchased the land from Unocal in 1978 and leased it to Harbor Square Associates. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 1-3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PLANNED REMOVAL ACTIVITIES The RAP for impacted soil associated with Remediation Areas I and II-1 includes the excavation of petroleum -impacted soil and removal of the material from the site for offsite treatment and/or disposal at a licensed facility. Oversight of removal activities will be provided by authorized employees of Landau Associates (project oversight personnel) who will coordinate the action with Harbor Square representatives. The objectives for the RAP are: • To protect human health and the environment • To minimize potential for migration of contamination from the in situ soil to the Edmonds Marsh via a preferential flow conduit (the existing stormwater drainage system at the site). It is anticipated that these objectives will be achieved with the physical removal of the in situ soil impacted by TPH at concentrations in excess of 2,000 mg/kg. In the absence of a site -specific risk analysis at this time, the 2,000 mg/kg cleanup goal for the soil excavation activities was established as a conservative action level. Following the completion of excavation activities and subsequent verification sampling and analysis of soil left in place, the extent of the excavation area will be surveyed and backfilled with clean material. 2.1 REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES Removal action activities will primarily be completed by remediation contractors with oversight by project oversight personnel. The removal action will consist of the following items: • Pre -mobilization activities (Section 2.2) — Includes the completion of a horizontal survey to identify the anticipated lateral extent of the excavation area, the acquisition of necessary permits, finalization of a site -specific health and safety plan, coordination with Harbor Square, receipt of import/export approvals, the location and marking of underground utilities, and preparation of manifest documents. Project personnel will be responsible for completing tasks associated with pre -mobilization activities. • Mobilization and site preparation (Section 2.3) — Includes the protection of existing site features, setup of work zones, disconnection/rerouting of subsurface utilities (as necessary), and protection of existing site features. Project oversight personnel will provide direction in the completion of mobilization and site preparation activities. • Excavation and disposal of in situ soil (Section 2.4) - Includes removal and offsite disposal of asphalt and concrete overburden materials, excavation and staging of soil, collection and analysis of soil stockpile characterization samples, collection and analysis of soil verification samples, loading of soil into dump trucks, decontamination of dump trucks prior to exiting the site, and transport of contaminated soil for thermal desorption and/or landfill disposal. With the exception of the collection and analysis of soil samples, the remediation contractor 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-1 LANDAU AssocIATES will be responsible for all other activities related to the excavation and disposal of in situ soil, subject to the approval of project oversight personnel. • Site demobilization (Section 2.5) — Includes removal of all contractor -provided equipment and temporary structures used for the removal action, decontamination of all areas associated with the removal action that are impacted by contaminated soil, and assessing and restoring the site egress route to pre -excavation conditions. The remediation contractor will be responsible for site demobilization activities, subject to the approval of project oversight personnel. • Backfill (Section 2.6) — Includes a final survey of the soil excavation area, placement of clean fill into the excavation, compaction of the fill material, and restoration of the surface of the site to pre -excavation conditions. With the exception of the restoration of the surface of the site to pre -excavation conditions, the remediation contractor will be responsible for backfill activities, subject to the approval of project oversight personnel. 2.2 PRE -MOBILIZATION ACTIVITIES Prior to the initiation of removal action activities at the site, documentation must be prepared to indicate that the activities will be completed in compliance with applicable standards and health and safety guidelines. An explanation of these details follows. 2.2.1 EXCAVATION AREA SURVEY Prior to site mobilization activities, Landau Associates will hire a registered licensed surveyor to prepare an updated lateral survey to identify accurate locations of surface features in the vicinity of Remediation Areas I and II-1. Based on the survey data, the figures associated with the RAP will be updated to reflect site conditions. Prior to initiation of soil excavation, the boundaries of the excavation areas will be surveyed and visibly marked by Landau Associates to identify the proposed limits of the remediation areas. 2.2.2 PHOTODOCUMENTATION OF CONDITIONS Prior to site preparation, project oversight personnel will document the conditions of the site including, but not limited to, surface conditions (parking lots, curbs, sidewalks, landscaping, driveways), utilities, and buildings located in the vicinity to identify pre -excavation conditions. 2.2.3 PERMITTING The remediation contractor will be responsible for the acquisition of transportation permits and any pen -nits associated with the disturbance or relocation of subsurface utilities. Project oversight 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\17=25\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES personnel will be responsible for the acquisition of a City of Edmonds construction permit and a waste disposal permit. 2.2.4 PUBLIC NOTICE Landau Associates will organize a public meeting a minimum of 15 days prior to the commencement of site mobilization activities. The public meeting will be announced by the posting of signs in the public access areas of the Harbor Square complex, unless otherwise directed by Harbor Square representatives. In addition, a sign will be posted at the site location, a minimum of 15 days prior to mobilization activities, to inform the general public of the activities to be completed and to identify a person to contact for more information. Landau Associates personnel will post the sign and keep it posted until the project is completed. 2.2.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN A health and safety plan (Appendix A) has been prepared by Landau Associates for the completion of removal action activities and supervisory activities to be performed by Landau Associates at the site. The health and safety plan includes, at a minimum, discussion of potential exposure routes, criteria for personal protective equipment (PPE), emergency procedures, exposure mitigation procedures, air monitoring equipment required in the work zones, identification of a site safety coordinator, and provisions for daily tailgate safety meetings to be conducted by the site safety coordinator. All project oversight and remediation contractor employees on site must have completed Hazardous Waste Operation Worker (HAZWOPER) training in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Evidence of HAZWOPER training and annual 8-hour refresher training must be provided to the project oversight personnel representative prior to the commencement of work for all remediation contractor personnel to be onsite. Personnel present onsite that are not involved with the removal of the in situ soil material will be restricted to the "support zone," as defined in Section 2.3.2. Truck drivers whose trucks are being loaded in the "remedial action zone" will be instructed to remain in their vehicles with the windows rolled up while loading and decontamination activities are taking place. Truck drivers will be permitted to exit their vehicle and inspect the security of their load after exiting the "truck decontamination zone." 2.2.6 MANIFEST DOCUMENTATION Manifest documents will be prepared for the truck drivers for the transport and disposal of the impacted soil. The manifests will be prepared in quadruplicate with one copy each for the generator, the 718/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES transporter, the disposal facility, and a final copy returned to the generator after the material has been disposed at the disposal facility. Landau Associates personnel will sign the manifests and will represent the Port as the generator of the waste material. Project oversight personnel will be responsible for overseeing that each truckload of material is accompanied by three copies of the manifest prior to exiting the site and that the generator's copy of the manifest is retained at the site to be managed as indicated in Section 3.0. 2.3 MOBILIZATION AND SITE PREPARATION Mobilization and site preparation activities to be completed in advance of the soil excavation include the following: • . Protection of existing site features. To be performed by the remediation contractor. • Definition of work zones. To be performed by project oversight personnel as well as the excavation and truck -driving contractors. • Setup of the truck loading area and decontamination stations (dry and wet). To be performed by the remediation contractor. • Preparation of the personnel decontamination areas. To be performed by the remediation contractor. • Rerouting or dismantling of the storm drain. To be performed by the remediation contractor. • Rerouting of other subsurface utilities. To be performed under subcontract to the remediation contractor. These activities are discussed in further detail in the following sections. 2.3.1 PROTECTION OF EXISTING SITE FEATURES Prior to the initiation of removal action activities, project oversight personnel will identify site features that will require protection during remediation activities. These features include building structures, roadways, and fences. In addition, Landau Associates will contract an underground utility locating service to identify potential underground utilities that will require protection during the removal action. The remediation contractor will be required to protect the identified site features and utilities and will be responsible for the restoration of these items at the conclusion of the project to pre -excavation conditions. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-4 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2.3.2 DEFINITION OF WORK ZONES . Prior to commencement of removal action activities, work zones will be established to designate areas for specific tasks associated with the removal action. The work zones will include: the remedial action zone, the contamination reduction zone (which encompasses the truck decontamination zone and the personnel decontamination zone), and the support zone. Preliminary identification of these various zones is indicated on Figure 4. Definitions of these work zones are as follows: • Remedial Action Zone — The area encompassing Remediation Areas I and II-1 and the contamination reduction zone, as indicated on Figure 4. Only site personnel with proper training and equipped in appropriate PPE will be permitted to enter the remedial action zone after reviewing and signing the health and safety plan. The remedial action zone will be demarcated with caution tape during implementation of the removal action. This area is comparable to the exclusion zone defined in the health and safety plan (HASP) prepared by Landau Associates (Appendix A). • Contamination Reduction Zone — The area encompassing the truck decontamination zone and the personnel decontamination zone. — Truck Decontamination Zone — During the removal action activities, the truck decontamination zone will be located directly adjacent to and northeast of the truck loading area. The truck decontamination zone will be used for decontaminating trucks after they have been loaded with material for disposal. Only site personnel with proper training and equipped in appropriate PPE will be permitted to enter this area after reviewing and signing the health and safety plan. — Personnel Decontamination Zone — A personnel decontamination station will be designated for the duration of the removal action. Only site personnel with proper training and equipped in appropriate PPE will be permitted to enter this area after reviewing and signing the health and safety plan. • Support Zone — The remainder of the site will be used for ingress and egress for the site and will remain accessible to the public during the removal action. 2.3.3 TRUCK LOADING AREA SETUP A truck loading area will be prepared by the remediation contractor and will be located directly adjacent to and northeast of the Remediation Areas I and II-1, as indicated on Figure 4. The truck loading area (and associated truck decontamination zone) will be defined as indicated on Figure 4. When the removal action is not addressing Remediation Area I, the truck loading and truck decontamination area designated for Remediation Area I will be within the support zone and subject to public access. The same will be true for the truck loading area and decontamination zone designated for Remediation Area II-1 when this area is not being addressed by the removal action. The active truck loading area will be established by defining the lateral extent of the area using water -filled "Jersey" barricades and/or temporary "safety" fencing. The purpose of the loading area will be to minimize the spreading of spills 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-5 t.ANDAu ASSOCIATES that may occur during the loading of the trucks by limiting loading activities to a single area that is properly prepared for truck access. If any spills inadvertently occur, the soil will be cleaned up with each truck load and during decommissioning of the truck loading area at the completion of the removal action. 2.3.4 TRUCK DECONTAMINATION ZONE SETUP The remediation contractor will prepare a truck decontamination zone immediately adjacent to and northeast of the truck loading area. The truck dry decontamination station will be established (as with the truck loading area) by placing temporary safety fencing around the decontamination zone to delineate the area. Truck decontamination procedures will include removing excess soil from the exterior components of the truck (e.g., tires, truck bed, walls, tailgates, and bumpers) using a broom and placing the material into the truck for offsite disposal. 2.3.5 PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION ZONE SETUP The remediation contractor will prepare personnel decontamination zones. The personnel decontamination station will be located directly east of the truck loading area (Figure 4). Additional personnel decontamination stations will be set up, as needed. The personnel decontamination zone will be used for decontaminating site personnel who are exiting the remedial action zone or the truck decontamination zone and prior to entrance into the support zone. The personnel decontamination zone will also be used for the donning and doffing of PPE as personnel enter and exit the support zone. Upon exiting the remedial action zone or truck decontamination zone, personnel must pass through the personnel decontamination zone to remove PPE, which will be placed into trash bags for disposal at an appropriate facility. The remediation contractor will be responsible for setting up a boot wash station and eye wash station in the personnel decontamination zone. If wet decontamination methods are used, the boot wash water will be changed at least once per day and, as needed, when the water becomes excessively dirty. The decontamination water will be contained in 55-gal drums for subsequent offsite disposal. Dry personnel decontamination techniques (using a stiff brush) will be used, when feasible, to minimize the generation of decontamination waste water. 2.3.6 SUBSURFACE UTILITIES Prior to excavation activities, Landau Associates will contact local public utilities and contract a subsurface utility locating contractor to identify the subsurface utilities routed through Remediation Areas I and II-1. Based on the identification of subsurface utilities, the remediation contractor will arrange for the temporary re-routing of utilities that cannot be protected during the remedial action. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-6 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2.4 IN SITU SOIL EXCAVATION Removal activities will begin with the excavation of Remediation Area I followed by Remediation Area II-1. The estimated extents of the remediation areas are as follows: • Remediation Area 1: 7,100 square feet (ft); excavated to a depth of 7 ft below ground surface (BGS); 1,840 cubic yards (yd3) of soil • Remediation Area II-1: 6,400 ft'; excavated to a depth of 6 ft BGS; 1,422 yd3 of soil. Project oversight personnel will assist the contractor in segregating the clean and impacted soil as the excavation is being conducted (see Section 2.4.1). Figure 5 shows two cross -sectional views of the materials anticipated to be encountered based on previous investigations. Excavation activities are scheduled to occur on weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., unless otherwise requested by Harbor Square representatives. 2.4.1 EXCAVATION STAGING AND STOCKPILE SAMPLING Excavated soil will be temporarily placed into two separate onsite stockpiles referred to as "clean" and "impacted" soil stockpiles. The clean soil stockpile will include material that is excavated and is determined not to contain free -phase petroleum product, olfactory evidence of petroleum impacts, or volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in excess of 20 parts per million (ppm), as determined using a photoionization detector (PID). The remainder of the excavated material will be placed in the impacted soil stockpile. Approximately one soil sample will be collected per every 500 cubic ft of excavated material. Approximately four representative soil samples (including one quality control sample) will be collected from the temporary clean soil stockpile. If representative soil samples collected from the temporary clean soil stockpile are analyzed by a laboratory and reported to not contain diesel- and heavy oil -range TPH (TPH-Dx) in excess of the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A soil cleanup level for unrestricted land use (2,000 mg/kg), the temporary clean stockpile material will be transported to the Clean Soil Stockpile Area identified on Figure 4. Approximately five representative soil samples (including one quality control sample) will be collected from the impacted soil stockpile. Soil stockpile samples will be collected into clean sample containers provided by the laboratory. Each of the sample jars collected at each location will be labeled and packed in ice in a cooler. The samples will be submitted to an analytical laboratory with appropriate chain -of -custody forms accompanying the samples with results provided on a 24-hour turnaround time for TPH. The samples will be analyzed for gasoline -range TPH (TPH-G) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) using Ecology Method NWTPH-Gx and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-7 LANDAu ASSOCIATES 802113, as well as TPH-Dx using Ecology Method NWTPH-Dx. Soil analyses will be performed by a local certified laboratory. At the conclusion of excavation activities, the clean soil will be used to backfill the excavation areas. Material in the impacted soil stockpile will be placed in dump trucks for offsite disposal at a licensed facility. Representative soil samples will be collected from the impacted soil stockpile to characterize the material being disposed; however, due to space constraints at the site, the material will be permitted for offsite disposal based on the site investigation data compiled to date. The excavation is scheduled to be completed as follows: • Soil stockpiles will be placed on one layer of 4-mil thick polyethylene sheeting. An additional layer of 4-mil thick polyethylene sheeting will be placed over soil stockpiles. • Excavation will be completed to the approximate depth specified on Figure 4. • Project oversight personnel will use field -screening instruments (e.g., PID); field observations (e.g., color, sheen, odor); and laboratory analytical results from soil samples to direct the remediation contractor on the removal and segregation of clean and impacted soil. • Excavation sidewalls adjacent to existing structures will be shored accordingly or the sidewalls of the excavation will be sloped to the angle of repose to protect sidewalks and building foundations. • If large rocks or debris, pipelines, or conduit are encountered during the excavation activities, the material will be decontaminated and disposed at a recycling facility or appropriate landfill, subject to the approval of project oversight personnel. 2.4.2 VERIFICATION SAMPLING Following completion of soil excavation, Landau Associates personnel will collect soil verification samples from the extent of the remediation area. Soil verification samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis. Final soil verification samples will be collected from the sidewalls and base of each remediation area. The samples will be collected from approximately 0 to 6 inches into the sidewall and base at each sample location using a stainless -steel spoon or hand auger, or from the excavator bucket when gaining access to sample locations could be a personal safety hazard. If soil is collected from the excavator bucket, care will be taken to collect the sample from the least disturbed soil not in direct contact with the excavator bucket. Approximately one soil sample will be collected per every 100 linear ft of sidewall and every 1,000 ft2 of base area in the bottom of the excavation. The proposed verification sample locations are presented on Figure 6. Actual sample locations may vary depending on field conditions encountered. The final sample collection locations will be recorded on a map prepared by personnel collecting the soil samples. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-8 LANDAu ASSOCIATES Each of the verification samples will be collected into clean sample containers provided by the laboratory. Each of the sample jars collected at each location will be labeled and packed in ice in a cooler. The samples will be submitted to an analytical laboratory with appropriate chain -of -custody forms accompanying the samples with results provided 'on a 24-hour turnaround time for TPH. The samples will be analyzed for TPH-G and BTEX using Ecology Method NWTPH-Gx and EPA Method 8021B, as well as TPH-Dx using Ecology Method NWTPH-Dx. Soil analyses will be performed by a local certified laboratory. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated by scrubbing the equipment with a liquid mixture of tap water and biodegradable soap (e.g., Alconox or Liquinox), rinsing with tap water, and rinsing with distilled water. All water and water -soap mixtures will be contained in 5-gal buckets and stored in the truck decontamination area. Upon completion of soil removal activities, decontamination water will be placed in 55-gal drums and transported offsite by the Port for proper disposal at a water treatment facility. Nitrile gloves worn by personnel will be changed between sample collection locations. PPE worn by personnel during sample collection and decontamination procedures will be placed in a trash bag for disposal, as indicated in the project HASP. If a verification soil sample analysis indicates an exceedance of the cleanup action goals (MTCA Method A for unrestricted land use), additional excavation and verification sampling may be completed in the localized area determined to contain the exceedance(s). 2.4.3 MATERIAL LOADING Material loading operations will be conducted in an organized manner. Trucks will be routed through a truck staging area, truck loading area, and truck decontamination station as the material loading processes are completed (Figure 4). In conjunction with the loading of material, the excavation contractor will be responsible for the proper management of decontamination water, as well as implementing dust control methods, as necessary. The impacted soil that is excavated will be loaded by the excavation contractor onto dump trucks for transportation to the appropriate disposal/treatment facility. After the soil has been loaded, the stockpile liner and cover materials will be transported to a solid waste landfill for disposal. Spillage soil present in the loading area will be removed with each truckload and will be disposed with the impacted soil. The following procedures apply to truck loading, decontamination, and dust suppression. 2.4.3.1 Truck Loading Truck loading operations are scheduled to occur between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays, unless otherwise requested by Harbor Square representatives. Trucks entering the Harbor Square 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\1 71025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-9 - LANDAuAssoc1ATES complex will be directed to a truck loading area. Project oversight personnel will examine trucks prior to the vehicles entering the truck loading area to verify that the trucks are prepared for loading (i.e., empty and "clean"). Remediation contractor personnel will direct trucks to the truck loading area for loading of soil. After movement to the truck loading area, truck drivers will position their trucks as directed by the remediation contractor. The trucks will be loaded by remediation contractor personnel using heavy equipment. The remediation contractor will limit the free -fall height of soil into the trucks to minimize dust generation. The weight of material present in each truck load will be measured and recorded using onboard electronic scales or jump scales provided by the remediation contractor. Truck drivers will remain in the cab of the truck with the windows closed while the truck is being loaded. After the truck is loaded with soil, remediation contractor personnel will direct the truck driver to pull forward into the truck decontamination station (Figure 4). 2.4.3.2 Truck Decontamination Procedures Truck decontamination activities will be restricted to the designated truck decontamination zone where remediation contractor personnel will decontaminate the exterior of the truck and the truck tires. Two methods of decontamination may be used in the truck decontamination station — dry decontamination and wet decontamination. A brief description of the two decontamination methods follows: • Dry Decontamination — For this method, remediation contractor personnel will use dry brooms and brushes to remove visual evidence of soil or debris from the exterior of the truck, trailer bed, and wheels. This method will be used whenever dry weather or soil conditions allow the soil or debris to be effectively removed by brooms and brushes. • Wet Decontamination — For this method, remediation contractor personnel will use a pressure washer and brushes to remove visual evidence of soil or debris from the exterior of the truck, trailer bed, and wheels. This method will be used whenever wet weather conditions prevent the soil or debris from being effectively removed by brooms and brushes. Typically, dry decontamination will be the method of choice, because it has the potential to produce less waste material. All personnel involved in the decontamination of trucks will be required to wear PPE as prescribed by the site -specific HASP prepared by Landau Associates. Truck drivers will remain in the cab of the truck with the windows closed while the truck is being decontaminated. After the truck is decontaminated, remediation contractor personnel will direct the truck driver to pull forward into the support zone to receive waste manifest paperwork, cover the load, and to exit the site. Truck drivers can inspect the security of the load in the support zone prior to exiting the site. Decontamination water, if generated, will be contained in 55-gal drums in the truck decontamination station. Truck decontamination 7/8/04\\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\HarborSquare_RAP.doc 2-10 LANDAU ASSOCIATES water will be transported offsite, along with personnel decontamination water, for proper disposal at a water treatment facility. 2.4.33 Dust Suppression During soil excavation and loading activities, the remediation contractor will implement dust suppression activities, as dictated in the HASP. Dust suppression activities may include misting water over the dust -generating area to suppress the air particulates. If dust suppression activities do not result in the suppression of air particulates to an acceptable level, site personnel will be required to comply with the HASP regarding respiratory protection. 2.4.4 MATERIAL TRANSPORT The transportation of soil from the site for offsite treatment and/or disposal will require that the truck -driving contractor use safe practices for transport of the materials, including preparing a manifest for each truckload, and designating safe and certified truck routes for transporting the soil to a treatment/ disposal facility. The material will be transported according to Washington State Department of Transportation requirements. All trucks must use a load cover to reduce the potential for soil material to be spilled during transport. 2.4.4.1 Truck Manifests Each truck leaving the site will be accompanied by a proper manifest for transporting the material on U.S. highways, as discussed in Section 2.2.6. The waste manifests will be issued to truck drivers prior to departure of the loaded trucks from the site. The waste manifests will include information related to the generator of the material, the transporter of the material, the point of departure and the destination of the material, the type of material being transported, the quantity of material, the loading date, and any disposal approval codes that may be necessary to properly track the waste. 2.4.4.2 Route of Site Egress The proposed route of egress from the truck decontamination area is provided on Figure 4. The route will be followed by all trucks leaving the site, unless otherwise directed by the project oversight personnel and approved by Harbor Square management. 718/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-1 1 LANDAu ASSOCIATES 2.4.5 DISPOSAL OF STOCKPILE MATERIAL Upon arrival at the disposal facility, truck drivers will follow standard facility procedures to dispose of their loads. The trucks will be routed through an entrance gate and the truck drivers will present gate personnel with the manifest for their load. The gate personnel will record the weight of all trucks, sign the waste manifest, return the transporter copies of the manifest to the driver, and provide direction to the proper deposition location. The final generator copies of the manifest will be sent by the disposal facility to Landau Associates. 2.4.5.1 Truck Decontamination 9 Prior to exiting the disposal facility, trucks are to be decontaminated as directed by disposal facility personnel. At a minimum, facility personnel will decontaminate the trucks prior to the trucks exiting the facility, and truck drivers should avoid tracking mud onto the road at the exit from the facility. .2.4.5.2 Recordkeeping Prior to exiting the disposal facility, trucks will be weighed again. Original copies of the truck weight tickets indicating gross weight (truck and soil weight at entry) and tare weight (truck at exit) and the generator's copy of the manifest will be maintained by the disposal facility and sent by mail to Landau Associates. 2.5 SITE DEMOBILIZATION This section provides details related to the removal of equipment from the site following the completion of stockpile removal activities. 2.5.1 TRUCK LOADING AREA Following the loading of materials (soil, stockpile liner, and cover) and backfill of the excavation areas, the truck loading areas will be decommissioned. The asphalt will be cleaned with a power broom, as necessary, at the conclusion of the material loading operation. Material collected from the cleaning of the pad will be incorporated with material to be disposed at the proper facility. 2.5.2 EQUIPMENT REMOVAL Following the closure of the truck loading area, the remediation contractor will remove all heavy equipment and temporary structures used during the removal action from the site. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-12 (_ANDAu ASSocIATES 2.5.3 SITE EGRESS ROUTE RESTORATION During soil removal activities, the potential exists for trucks to track "clean" soil and rocks onto the truck egress route. The remediation contractor will clean the truck egress route with a power broom, as necessary, during the removal action and following the completion of soil -loading activities. In addition, information provided by the Port suggests that the subgrade material within the site egress route may be subject to significant settling and compaction due to truck traffic. The remediation contractor will be responsible for the restoration of the egress route to its pre -excavation condition at the conclusion of the project. 2.6 BACKFILL OF EXCAVATION AREA After receiving analytical data indicating that the excavation efforts are complete, the Port will give approval to backfill the excavation area. Prior to commencing the backfill of the excavation area, a survey of the excavation area (vertical and horizontal) will be completed. The survey of the excavation area will be completed by a registered surveyor. The survey results will be used to verify soil removal quantities and to delineate the extent of the excavation on site plans. The excavation contractor will use the clean overburden material previously excavated and stockpiled onsite and additional material from an offsite source to backfill the excavation area. Fill material brought in from an offsite source must be certified to be free of contamination according to representative laboratory analytical reports. Backfill material will be placed in 2-ft increments and compacted to 95 percent dry density (ASTM D 1557-modified proctor) from the top of the water table to within approximately 4 inches below grade. Density gauge test results will be provided by the excavation contractor to onsite Landau Associates personnel. Compaction of backfill soil will not be required at depths below the groundwater table. Asphalt concrete pavement will be used to restore the upper 4 inches to original ground surface conditions. The remediation contractor will also restore any surface features (sidewalk, curbs, landscaping, etc.) to pre -excavation conditions. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 2-13 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3.0 FIELD DOCUMENTATION All field activities, including soil removal and soil verification sampling, will be documented and managed by project oversight personnel in appropriate forms and in field notebooks. - Field documentation will include the following: • Health and Safety Plan signed by all personnel within the work zone • Daily Tailgate Safety Meeting forms signed by personnel present • Air Monitoring Data forms to be completed by Landau Associates personnel • Original generator waste manifests for each load of material taken offsite for incineration/ disposal • Final copies of waste manifests provided to Landau Associates after each load of material has been deposited at the disposal facility • Copies.of weight tickets provided to Landau Associates after each load of material has been deposited at an offsite disposal facility • Daily logs indicating the identification of each loaded truck exiting the site • Daily logs indicating the excavation contractor's daily activities • Photographic log of the activities being completed at the site • Sample collection forms for each verification soil sample collected from the extents of each excavation lift • Chain -of -custody records for verification soil samples submitted to an offsite laboratory • Field notes completed in field notebooks or on Field Report forms by project oversight personnel to document removal action activities, including problems encountered and methods of resolution. Copies of Landau Associates' field documentation forms to be used are included in Appendix B. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 3-1 LANDAu AssocIATES 4.0 REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT Following the completion of excavation and disposal activities and the receipt of verification soil sample analytical results, Landau Associates will prepare a soil Removal Action Completion Report on behalf of the Port. The soil Removal Action Completion Report will document activities related to the removal of the current soil stockpile at the site. At a minimum, the soil Removal Action Completion Report will provide the following information: • Summary of work completed during removal activities • Total quantity (mass) of the soil disposed • Presentation of removal records including daily logs, waste manifests, and weight tickets • Description of work area following the completion of removal activities and equipment demobilization • Verification soil sample results. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 4-1 LANDAu ASSOCIATES 5.0 SCHEDULE Landau Associates is prepared to commence the soil removal actions on August 2, 2004. It is currently planned that pre -mobilization, mobilization, and site preparation activities will be completed by August 5, 2004 and soil removal is scheduled to begin on August 9, 2004. Based on the estimated volume of soil to be removed and the approximate distance from the site to the disposal facility, it is anticipated that the soil excavation activities will be completed at Remediation Areas I and II-1 by September 3, 2004. The surface area at Remediation Area I should be restored by August 20, 2004 and the surface area of Remediation Area II-1 should be restored by September 15, 2004. 7/8/04 \\Edmdata\wproc\173\025\Harbor Square_RAP.doc 5-1 LANDAu ASSOCIATES a Message Page 1 of 2 Harrison, Marie From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 8:09 AM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: FW: Harbor Square Remediation Project FYI -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:18 PM To: Bullock, Steve; Graf, Jeannine; Umbaugh, Theresa; Readwin, Jennifer; Fiene, Don; Chrisman, Lyle; Bowman, Duane Subject: FW: Harbor Square Remediation Project Forwarded for info. Dave -----Original Message ----- From: David Nelson [mailto:dnelson@landauinc.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:15 PM To: Gebert,. David Subject: RE: Harbor Square Remediation Project Dave, My boss, Martin, said that the remediation contractor (a subcontractor; we are still accepting bid proposals at this time) will be responsible for the acquisition of transportation permits and any permits associated with the disturbance or relocation of subsurface utilities. Project oversight personnel (Landau Associates) will be responsible for the acquisition of a City of Edmonds construction permit and a waste disposal permit. David Nelson Staff Geologist Landau Associates, Inc. 130 2nd Ave S Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-0907 Phone (425) 778-6409 Fax (800) 552-5957 -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David [mailto:Gebert@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:09 PM To: David Nelson Cc: Bullock, Steve; Chrisman, Lyle; Cunningham, Diane; Graf, Jeannine; Umbaugh, Theresa; Readwin, Jennifer; Fiene, Don; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: Harbor Square Remediation Project David, Our Planning Division handles public notice signs for land use actions. I'll check with them to see what they have that they could provide you for guidance on the signs. 7/23/2004 Message Page 2 of 2 If you haven't already done so, I would suggest that you or Martin contact our permit center, and possibly even meet with us to discuss permit requirements for your project. You may also need other permits such as grading permits, etc. I would be happy to arrange such a meeting if you wish. Dave -----Original Message ----- From: David Nelson [mailto:dnelson@landauinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 5:41 PM To: gebert@ci.edmonds.wa.us Subject: Harbor Square Remediation Project Dave, Thanks for returning my call. The report that was forwarded to you is long, yes. Basically we're planning on excavating a couple areas down at the Harbor Square complex. The property is private property, but we will be requiring a City Permit to divert stormwater and other utilities. My boss, Martin Powers, has been handling that end of things. I was interested in what sort of signage template or requirements that the City of Edmonds uses for public notice. Any imput you have on that or permitting is appreciated. Thank you. David Nelson Staff Geologist Landau Associates, Inc. 130 2nd Ave S Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-0907 Phone (425) 778-6409 Fax (800) 552-5957 7/23/2004 - + r T /+ / O DP-4 + / O HS-9 r f— /+ /+ DP-24 i /+ /+ + W-5 / ri O +/ �F + } i / DP-5 / + 190 t + c / W. Dayton St +j / J`\`cA HS-6 + + Q• (Building 1) / � >9 DP-25 I I Area 11-1 • / (6- BGS) H Y DP-22O HS-7 S 4 DP-23 / DP-3 P 10 �. DP-11 O DP-30 + .�. -28 DP-31+O DP9 +/ 180�' O W. Dayton St. • / + (Building 4) f DP-13 a: a • S5 K P-19 tDP-16 = ' -� Area `IHS-1 wC*? �� • (7- BGS) O P=1'5A'.1'T= 1 170 ��• DP-18 DP';TSBs W. Dayton St MW-3 _ 9 (Building 3) a /Y},litl� s DP-17.` N� � "W-Y m � irxu� r ( Lxn :(i . Edmonds ` E Marsh • \ \. MW 4 \ mAwl>\ m �Q [A LANMJ ASSICIATES 0 60 120 Scale in Feet W. Dayton St. DP-33 120 W. Dayton St. (Building 2) O P-6 O P-8 RECEIVED j JUL 2 8 2004 PERMIT COUNTER Area II-2 (6- BGS) .1.0, DP-3 O a DP-2N jf DP-2 DP-2 MW-1 • DP-7 r•12i9 I DP-1 DP-7E Notes 1. All locations are approximate. 2. Monitoring well MW-4 was destroyed and replaced by MW-6 in 1998. 3. Black and white reproduction of this color original may reduce its effectivness ands lead to incorrect interpretation. . Legend A As Cross Section Locations Areas Designated for Soil Removal m Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Visible Product or Elevated TPH Concentrations (>2,000 mg/kg) from April 2004 Investigation Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Low TPH Concentrations (<2,000 mg/kg) or No Detected TPH Concentrations from April 2004 \ Investigation 19 Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Visible Product or Elevated TPH Concentrations (>2,000 mg/kg) from Phase 1 and II Investigations ® Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Low TPH Concentrations (<2,000 mg/kg) or No Detected TPH Concentrations from Phase I and 11 Investigations 0 Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Visible Product or Elevated TPH Concentrations (>2,000 mg/kg) from June 2003 Investigation Q Approximate Location of Soil Boring with Low TPH Concentrations (<2,000 mg/kg) or No Detected TPH Concentrations from June 2003 Investigation Approximate Location of Monitoring Well Borehole with Visible Product or Elevated TPH Concentrations (>2,000 mg/kg) 40 Approximate Location of Monitoring Well Borehole with Low TPH Concentrations (<2,000 mg/kg) or No Detected TPH Concentrations o Catch Basin Storm Drain O Manhole x— Fence STREET Base map source: Reid Middleton Associates 1982 and 1989 Harbor Square Edmonds, Washington L Figure _ Soil Excavation Areas 3 �E�E9�/e•r. STREET FILE JUL 2 8 2004 PERMIT COUNTER /8o H/. DAYIr�/sr STREET FILE ICE) a• A Bu f I m C-3E �c C o� z C N � C O rn in cn M Cl Port of Edmonds 110 West Dayton BLDG 110 Elevations Edmonds, WA 98020 CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTP�!' FOR INSPECTION CALL 0 Permit�' + 775-2525 Ext. 220 Issue Date SIDE SEWER PERMIT 2 .;-_ PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE =� EDM Np DS 1. Address of Construction ' ' �- TREATMENT, Pi I i .i .' l i.i i f 2. Property Legal Description (include all easements) 3. Single Family Residence Multi -Family toiff Commercial 1L �Lt 4. Owner and/or Builder ' 5. Contractor & License No. _ 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes -(If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before excavation). 7. Cross other private property: Yes No sement required - attach legal description and county easement number. READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each installation for one year. C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") side sewer line. d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.150) and maximum grade of 100% (450). f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/8,bend)' is allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45° (1/8 bend) and Wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice required. DATE: s '1, 5 - -(_d ' _ r% j�l ✓� i I certify 't at I have read and shall comply with the above PERMIT FEE: S�'�rs(P, x �/., Os �/ DISAPPROVED BY: Date: CONNECTION FEE: APPROVED By: Date: w . * PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE CIO SA,1-- 'l-N, (v-j Lc I — — — — — -floc I f V, L- tUL NOV 2 1 CITY OF EDAAONDS BLDG. DEPT. CONDITIONAL PERMIT WORK-,,�� ADMESS.//0 &J- Ow. ER- AIJ, P"f V2- - -a3 A r 10VED BY AeeVQ-55 • KL-,-P THES S TA Mi F E D 'LAN'S, ON K`SITE FOR ALL tv I -Mi C- SHEET' qk3 OF GREENTREE LANDSCAPES- 15615 UNG PLACE LYININNVOOD, WA 98036 r. 773-8200 431-1001 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO. ............... ---------------- ----------- If, NEW CONSTRUCTION gJ REPAIRS D LID NO. ------------------ ASMT. NO. _------_------- OWNER PUG F . ..... W-F-15T ----- (Z.C)(kp - --------------------- CONTRACTOR ----------------------------------------------------------------- - --------- ------ PERMIT NO. .70.2.3 JOB ADDRESS .... 1-10 ------ Wear ---- Dk-y--rotA ............. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. .......... 10-------------- �3 --------------- BLOCK NO. ---------- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- -.1.4XR1_B43R S _ . . ........................ ........ NAME OF ADDITION --------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------ L EDMONDS —1 4OP 8=40 c.c:l.WVF- C.6.ppr , Approved: IA DAY70N S-MF-E-r L0,7jy��M♦t-5}RI'ti' W.I'•+T06j GfRn .hsM '. _ � ! d,C,. ;df..�� f '� ,il�s �i }� rG�•uE.T:t;it �� i.+, " 1�Fi:t t'._ to :w�.+`1• :�i yu1 1�•ii.Yg `,4;:.. � T r..f iF.72� A':ptJ �$� :!. ' CITY OF; MQNdS �IaaE� .CONSTRUCTION P PUCATION.: ( ei FIARBQR NUARE91SSOCI`fHS «n 300'Admi�e� Way \ _ • N 1. i ds na-asro� PUaUC ROM Y PEq fi/ICaAL Ei IaAP - . DED�CAi ON YARkEt1 •,LAFON ARCHITE�T �' ' . ' • `-��: IIIOPIT, AVAY CONSTNUCTION PanUff IEE(1UWEDC . E \ .p ADDRESS, 'i 1ji1 N,yC Lill I]ri ie - 1 eTREET IlZ6 PERWT REaARFAo _ i E'OINEEEVNO MEMO, DATED TEIEPNONE NUMSEF .' 'eti MW I EPT RMrW C40K. LIST DAZED Edmonds, T74-0580 REw �. � ,,.,,E• .. dEL o � r iC0✓ ADQIRIEUt .180 Witt - Dayton • 100101.42 ETER6VPrLv Uzi Ib 'IELk PHONE NUMBER Edfitonds, 774-2.712 • )1, 1 REMAIN . b ATE LICEN6E N4MBER CITYLICEIEGE NUMBER ENV NEMEw Aoe wo, Desc6prion of Property - include all easerhents 7. ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE "EMPi. (Sfq+e beldw or attach four copies) •r > .. ". ~ e - . , ' :''See Master Site Plan VARIANCE OR CU If /5 YARDS LOT 2 i 2 • .. -FRONT .SIDE REAR ` MA . I o i7 D • IIEbiDENDAL PLUMBING D'AALTER D Cop' IO DO'NQNRESIDENTIAL MJ;CHANICAI _ - .. 'D:REPAIA •,D D j f .. RETAINING WALL SIGN 1[NCC D CHECAEU kit IVp COr.1IMUCi10N MOLIS.. ONu uTE ,D , . ..FTI NN �9.T9 35 Mr. MOVE INSVI D $W14 SPECIf,L INSIACION A,.LA Q:CuhANCT T C M%.IA N(' INSY, L REOURED y' GN14P LOAD. Q �'L., v ' - D SIC, SfwER D WATER. LINE D ,I TES. rq MARAS �\ .. .._..... _ i XL- I IJ L�`PE{- S_t- r oola: NLiY9ER OF SIOHIES NU'"A OF (Q Q1E.Jj .� `�A�cD •" �_. .DWELLING r^� 2 UNITS N.Tw.L r.w, Io eL DUNL 0nAcN. �Lu ., QQ�(> I CTloiK See -Attached FEf ' ' •,t'. PLAN CNECKFEE 1A ' BUILDING LGI 1' 3 43, l . . I yI,Ne1N0 6: - MECHANICAL r I Th Permrt Corers work to be o6ne on private property ONLY. - GAAD.A.Lk ,K ` Any construction on the public domain IcJrbs, sidewalkal'. _ drrvew'ay4: marquees, efc.} will require-separele permisslon. , Permit Application: 180 Dpys'` . - .. .. t . • Permii Limit: 1 Year - Pfoy0ed Work is Started Withm 180 Days . - :'Apply Ant. On.be"If of his or her spouse,•heim, assigns and wcceaaors in ultajeSt, egress to Indemnify', date no anti hold . harmless the Cfy of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, employees, and, apentp from any and all claims lot damages of 'whatever nsluje:'ansing direclfy OI Indirectly from Ins issuance Z of in 13 permlf. Issuance of this permit Shall not be deemed 10 rmodlty, wdlveor reduce.any requirement of any City ordinance nor limit iryany way the Clty's ability to enforce tiny ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE �2 .. wovislon.' • '' I fEef",'acknowtedge that I have read this application; that the Intormation.given Is correct; and that f am the owner. of Ihti duly A T I EN TION APPLICATION APPROVAL • authomM ageiu of the owner. I agree to comply with city arid yes PLRMn state tawslegulating construction; and N1 doing the Mork wtllerlZ- .un•GNIILs 1TId application a Iql a DMrrrll until ' ad thereby, no,pweon will to employed In violation of the Labor that10r1 LINL. 1. signed by lM BLREpYIp OHfciak or his ' ' Code Of the Mate of Wssningt sling to Workmen's Compent a. , •�'N" Nun I. Dapufy; and to" we pekq aN eceiph a - #Ion In ' wT 0 INSw.:l nr,I' acknowledged In apace,prpvlped, (N-AMI u. Nr - . •. - THIS S1Te IS LOCATED IN THE CITY EI>kau+ne. Q�Q� J -ps LESTAx ATTENTION s OUID BE CODEF EDMONDS. LOCAL ;,�?ti:Sl wrE \ ,IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STTIUCIURE - ' NT • Utl. A FIkAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND,APPRO�AL OR ON14iNAL '— File YELLOW — Inspector A' CERTIFICATE OF OCODPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC a' . CHAPTER' APR 15 1983 PINK — Owner GOLD _ Aaaellaor a. ,' . - - .. r.• s 1,i.. .'.i t°ps� :_,ma`s ^�I ,7-yt V i _ •�'. • / t ; �'dx` 4 fir .. - - •r•� Yt•= � i •ear isi • � y ��ri . T OR T °. INSPECTIOt REPOR, fn BUIiDING DEPARTHENT., CITY OP EDMONDs 83,) 3Z�' PERMIT NUMBER PROJECT INSPECTOR .. ADDRESS r DATE-- INSPEC7,10tJ DESCRIPTION ♦ ' LA�J av i d--VoyVA� �R SJ)a:!�IAL- IviSPECTtoN 1ZFP�►�T 1� .. ' • ' � � � ��- oYa'r� 2,�; � sty : C'cNc ' • ' , �... t � , AR -CA =wr L-- v t2 RECORp •Of INSPECTIONS Dale Passed • FOUNDATION --" " -- I House . , Porches. m?rs Retainini; well, •— — ----- — �'', • VIF.FTING SYSTF.Id •..�-----""" '. ;;'8: i FRAMING' FINAL64. •�.,. o4iC � h/ f L ,: t PLANNING DATA STREET FILE -- Signs -- Name: Date: Site Address: Plan Check' #: BLD 2plSOr,;L Project Description: S, Reduced Site Plan Provided: YES NO) Zoning: '*S". �0 S, .. L- Comprehensive Plan Designation: Map Page: 11� Comer Lot: ( ES NO) Flag Lot: (YES / VO ADB File # (or date waived): TOTAL Area. Type of Si n Type of Sign Allowed in Matrix conditions Allowed area per Unit TOTAL sign area Proposed zone. met_ unit allowed for sign area this sign Example Wall w/internal i/luminaGon Yes with conditions Yes 1 sq. R /Lneal It -attached 41 R: attached wall 41 square feet 20 square feet wall Sign # L A o ,:z'1 1 » Q0JV/A &�. W z11 S: � w•aa\ Sign #2 Ate.,;,,��► � �bl.0 band !GS N/A Ai'm s: Sign #3 NIA „ 3:k. G 0 TOTAL Si n Area fo Tenan ite Max Permitted: 1 Previous Total: Proposed Total: 1 4.S Sin Height Sign Type:W.41 Max Permitted: 1 1''e- b � Actual Height: � �,t• 4r1 0� fuc Sign Type: '-\\ 3 Pceposd'l k1r) Max Permitted: dual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Si n Li htin Sign Type: rAin Proposed: ^ ,11 ti Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: 3 f r-ofo--AAI. s��s� Proposed: Allowed in Zone: I� PLANNING DATA ST1?EET FILE -- Signs -- Srgn Colors Proposed: o� Acceptable? Requires ADB Approval? -Sign Location If freestanding and 3-feet or dver,(uriless a fence) -meets setbacks? R uired Setbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: Actuaf Setbacks - Street: Side: Side: Rear:. Landscaping for Freesiandi. , S ns Size: Location: Critical Areas Determination #: ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver Other Plan Review By: Q�'Alv�s apt ,- CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORKADDRESS Sign #1 35.29 Triangular sft. 132.0" OWNER M,�F APPROVED DATE: BLDG. OFFICIAL ' P ' UBER 74Z- COMPASS COURSE -MARITIME Ti/[/'1INING- Approved Classes% e e Captain C Licensing • • co co 33' a111albe a« �,�.,: ..� �, Mesa Sigr#2Y:Q�9t8the pew' . STRE ET FILE is thieVeQ o� tngillef� µtlot'g a11o`Fr'nt� �entlyging19='�`e 01!ell •tetPT SPECS: a cti 0� Q, mit ae e scAPc1� i6 OU -3/4" PVC letters and logo with 1/4" PVC outline. COLOR SPA¢ Oj j 0f ,'h Op t�e Light C(31 ltl�n �, .�D -'aroes LS �� Utz vlte " y ��0 � n�, iol\ 9tTU Oran eo t Fv �e of A Uild"u% ® g CtU C11 b c'1-- ❑ White U;ldi gr oa�w s--Q g o3eek, �` Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. R ES U 6 • • omer has reviewed drawing and has MAY 0 5 2016 approved for production. 7Sinature site 1 be th ❑ "�t10n 1�C» ❑ _ W,,mP�t a l3tJILDING D PARTMENT CITY Of DMONDS Date m O Client: Compass Courses Contact•. Julie Keim Date: 6/24/2015 LL 19mm C." COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced In anyway without consent from SPORTS Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. 8 � O� For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. wwwap"rtboarde.net 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 E z � it Address: 110 W. Dayton St. Ste. 101 City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98020 Job M 21731 Mobile ti _ Phone If 425-778-1923 PO - E•Mail: julie@compasscourses.com Fax M 425-778-2843 Sales: B. Malinoski Design: B. Ma/inoski #21731 1/4" White PVC - Orange Face 'Edge Will Be White' ' COMPASS RADA SC^ O L Side View 3/4" White PVC Light Navy Face 'Edge Will Be White' r 3/4" White PVC 1/4" White PVC Light Navy Face r — Orange Face rDA I -' RA t _ 0L SS C 32.6 sft. SPECS: COLOR SPECS Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. -3/4" PVC letters and logo with 1/4" PVC 0 Light Navy ES U B I a ` - • D outline. Orange Customer has reviewed drawing and has ❑ White MAY 0 5 2016 approved for production. ❑ It11LDING DAHTMENT Signature MEiNDS Date m O ❑ - CITY OF Client. Compass Courses Contact: Julie Keim Date: 6/24/2015 RUS$ELL S143M 6. 0 ..- COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. p� p� Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from SPORTS Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are � kOS' subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. Www.sport0oarda.rret For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 (a d iTL Address: 110 W. Dayton St. Ste. 101 City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98020 Job # 21731 Mobile # - Phone # 425-778-1923 PO # - E-Mall: julie@Compasscourses.com Fax # 425-778-2843 Sales: B. Malinoski Design: B. Ma/inoski SIDE VIEW Sample Letter Stud Aluminum Studs Stucco Wall / Siliconed --., 1/4" White PVC Stud Orange Face *Edge Will Be White* 3/4" White PVC Light Navy Face Z • *Edge Will Be White* Stud Stud , 1/4" White PVC �. Light Navy Face *Edge Will Be White* i'r • 3/4" White PVC Orange Face / *Edge Will Be White* SPECS: COLOR SPECS R ES U B Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. -3/4" PVC letters and logo with 1/4" PVC N Light Navy outline. Orange MAY 0 5 2016 Customer has reviewed drawingand has approved for production. White -Stud mounted with silicon adhesive. - BUILDING D PAR MENT Signature U) DD 111:1- CITY OF DMONDS Date O Client Compass Courses Contact: Julie Keim Date: 6/24/2015 RUSLL .SE SImN 60- w�- COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. p� p� Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from S SPORTS Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentat cn and client approval ony. Artwork and des gns are subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. �O� • �� For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. w .sportboaras.net 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 tv E Z � Address: 110 W. Dayton St. Ste. 101 City: Edmonds State: WA Zlp: 98020 Job # 21731 Mobile # - Phone # 425-778 1923 PO # - E-Mall: Julie@compasscourses.com Fax 0 425-778-2843 Sales: B. Malinoski Design: B. Malinoski 1W7�� LS U U NJ t1 771 im COMPASS CO wLs .xaam�z rauwxa• " COMPASS RADAR SCHOOL_ '� I 1 o o m � S I I 120.0' Linear Feet SPECS: COLOR SPECS - 3/4" PVC letters and logo with 1/4" PVC Light Navy nn � Production Will Not Start Untll Customer Has Signed Off. l WARe ®' m � ® " outline. ❑ Orange letters Customer has reviewed drawing and has MAY 0 5 2016 for - Cut vinyl applied to awning ❑ White approved production. ❑ ' pUILDIV�t9 D��pp�� Signature tl 9 Y O1F ®l`R1DS fn 0° ❑ _ Date O Cnent•. Compass Courses Contact: Julie Keim Date: 6/24/2015 SELL SS�N 40C COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from S PORTS Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation end client approval only. Artwork and designs are subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. wwwspwtboanfa.rret For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 Iv E IU N Address: 110 W. Dayton St. Ste. 101 City: Edmonds State: WA Zlp: 98020 fob # 21731 Mobile # - Phone # 425-778-1923 PO ti - E-Mail: julie@compasscourses.com Fax N 425-778-2843 Sales: B. Malinoski Design: B. Malfnoski O m M CL 0 CL *� F__ d W. Dayton St. W. Dayton St. W. Dayton St. ■/y - Maverick Compass "" T • : Label Radar Scho 1 3 CD Entry Compass 0. Compass N r Courses Channe Courses r P. t, r. CD Marker Entry N SPECS: COLOR SPECS Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. -3/4" PVC letters and logo with 1/4" PVC 0 Light Navy Q FEB U M A o p D outline. ❑ Orange Customer has reviewed drawing and has . ❑ White MAY O 5 2016 approved for production. -Stud mounted with silicon adhesive. ❑ - Signature 05 ❑ - EWI M OF M DS Date O Client Compass Courses Contact: Julie Keim Date: 6/24/2015 Rl1SS;ELL COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from SPORTS Russell Sign Company. Ali Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are BOA®s subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. N W Address: 110 W. Dayton St. Ste. 101 City: Edmonds State: WA ZIP: 98020 Job f 21731 Mobile # Phone $ 425-778-1923 PO # - - SSON CQ 'prxthoantl=.net For more detailed Information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Pax 425.673.5508 z E-mail: julie@compasscourses.com Fax N 425-778-2843 Sales: B. Malinoski Design: B. Malinoski Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue Ncrih P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation . (206) 440-4000 February 24,1998 RECEIVED Jan Conner Harbor Square FEB 2 5 1998 COPY 120 West Dayton, Suite B-6 �NCII��E�NG Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Highway 104 Right -of -Way Dear Ms. Conner: This is in response to the concerns and issues you mentioned in your February 11,1998 letter. The Department found that our tenant, General Construction Company, has continuously complied with state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, and with the lease requirements. The tenant has cooperated diligently in trying to resolve previous concerns you expressed during the January 2,1998 meeting with Jeff Arviso, General Construction Company, and Roger Wilson, Washington State Ferries. Regarding the issues stated in your letter: 1. Install fence slats to fence common with the right-of-way and Harbor Square. In an act of good faith and acting strictly as a good neighbor, General Construction Company and the Washington State Ferries will pay several thousand dollars to install a privacy screen on the common west fence beginning at the northwest corner extending southerly 400'. The final 200' is well screened by existing trees and plants and is out of view. 2. No deliveries to site or equipment started prior to 7:00 a.m. The tenant has been and will continue to abide by the noise restrictions of the City of Edmonds, between the hours 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 3. Maintain a view corridor from Hotel, keeping unsightly items such as tires, etc., to the South. The tenant has diligently, maintained the leased premises in a proper manner. The tenant will continue to do so. r 4. Items staged should not exceed the height of the fence. Any items needed will continue to be stored on the leased premises for the ongoing project of Washington State Ferries. 5. Entry gate off SR 104 needs to be controlled, left open many times when no activity taking place. During normal operations, the tenant will enter the leased premises for storing or moving items needed for the ongoing project. It is left open during work hours and secured at night. Installation of the privacy screen is above and beyond the state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, and the lease requirements and will be provided.by the tenant strictly from the position of being a good neighbor. General Construction Company will consider acceptance of the installation of the screen and abiding by the City noise ordinance as final resolution of the Harbor Square and Harbor Inn concerns and issues. The tenant requests Harbor Square and Harbor Inn to acknowledge, sign, and return a copy of this letter as an acceptance of final resolution. Failure to do so, the tenant reserves the right to withdraw the offer of installation of the screen. Sincerely, (206) Accepted and Acknowledged by Harbor Square of W Agent 140 215 Harbor Inn cc: Frances O. Cal, Unit Manager for Property Management Paul Tollefson, Acting NW Region,Real Estate Services Manager Roger Wilson, Chief Inspector of Washington State Ferries Matthew Hensel, General Construction Company Jim Walker, City of Edmonds Lorena Eng, NW Region Project Development Engineer Cliff Kurtzweg, NW Region Assistant Project Development Engineer North Trish Nightingale, Assistant Attorney General PLANNING DATA -- Signs -- � Name: Ai 5 t-`,._ r Date: q 2 �,l $- Site Address: (O \ n Plan Check #: BLD-2 -Zo(s - (1 Z y Project Description: L'JeGt 5 Reduced Site Plan Provided: YE / NO) Zoning: CCU Comprehensive Plan Designation:,,_, Map Page: Corner Lot: YES NO) Flag Lot: (YES / O) ADB File # (or date waived): TOTAL Area. Type ofSi. n Type of Sign Allowed in zone? Matrix conditions met? Allowed area r unit Unit TOTAL sign area allowed for this si n Proposed sign area Example Wall w/intemal illumination Yes, with conditions Yes I sq_ tt:/lineal it attached Wa/l 41 R. attached Wal/ 41 square feet 20 square feet Sign #1 w�l\ ye-s 1i,,Q.,_,l ��• l.l vs - ��. Sign #2 Sign #3 TOTAL Signn Area for TenanVSite Max Permitted: ZS 4-; Previous Total: tjG, Proposed Total: Sign K ht Sign Type: k-i l l Max Permitted: v a i a Actual Height: 1 Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sin Li htin ►J �1 Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: , PLANNING DATA --- Signs -- STREET FILE " n Eo%rs Proposed: Acceptable? 5 Requires ADB Approval? Sign Location If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks? t�YA R �rir.�Setfiacks � .. . Street: Side: Side: Rear: Street Side: Side: Rear: Landsca in for�eesf�ndi .. - S `ram . ,�► Size: Location: Critical Areas Determination #: ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver Other ��s��.r "ems f�-✓;� ��L�2ol.S-OZ9Z) Plan Review By: 1 Yr cV7 RLEOF EDP City of Edmonds Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet - lnC Name of ]Proposed Project: Hart Crowser Owner/Applicant Tina Drennan, Port of Edmonds Name 336 Admiral Way Street/Mailing Address Edmonds WA 98020 City Telephone: 425.744.0549 State Zip Applicant Contact ]Person: Dana Piper, Allbee Romein Name 911 Western Ave, Suite 201 Street/Mailing Address Seattle WA 98104 City State Zip Telephone: 206.292.9101 Traffic ]Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): NA Firm Name Contact Name Telephone: E-mail: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) II. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT (DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: 190 W. Dayton St., Suite 201 a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: CONTRACT REZONE c. Specify proposed type and size of development: 4,726 SF T.I. ON 2ND FLOOR OF 2 STORY BLDG. NO RESIDENTIAL (# of residential units and/or square footage of building) Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 1 of S START IN JUNE IF POSSIBLE, d. Date construction will begin and be completed: DURATION APPROX 8 WEEKS e. Define proposed access locations: BUILDING FRONT DOOR, ELEVATOR/STAIRS f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50 % 95 % Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS Y 4 ' LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of With Project Without Project Land Use b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: ' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact .finalysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 NO CHANGE OF USE. PRIOR TENANT WAS CHAMBERS CABLE 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS (EDMONDS CABLE) CORPORATE OFFICES State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. ❑ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. Per Unit ITE Land Use Category Fee Rate New Use $ ]Prior Use $ Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfp, etc. X= XI I= New Use Fee: $ - Prior Use Fee: $ _ $ ❑ NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, vfp, etc. New Use $ X C OTHER Fee MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 + consultant fee $ TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval 1 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 AGREEMENT.AND COVENANT CONSTITul'ING A CONTRACT REZONE This Agreement contains the covenants entered into between THE PORT OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE PORT" and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE CITY". W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, THE PORT proposes the development of an approximately 1.4.6 acre parcel of real property in Edmonds, located at the southwest corner of Dayton Street and State Route 1.04, and being more specifically described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Rai.lroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 42* 34' 34" east 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 42* 34' 34" east 731.18 feet to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line south 58* 17' 06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88* 42' 06" east 524.29 feet; thence south 41.* 39' 17" east 110.49 feet to the right of ..way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. NO. 106375); thence south l* 08' 54" west along said right of way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence south 73* 00' 00" west. 240.00 feet; thence north 88* 30' 00" west 110.00 feet; thence north 66* 00' 00" west 1.40.00 feet; thence north 40* 00' 00" west 125.00 feet; thence north 1* 00' 00" west 2.00.00 feet; thence north 37* 00' 00" west 260.00 feet; thence south 71* 00' 00" west 401.09,feet to the true point of beginning. :WHEREAS, THE PORT has applied for a change in the zoning of the subject property from its current IP classification to GC and OS; and WHEREAS, THE CITY has caused the application in its entirety, including, but not limited to the Environmental Impact Statement, to be reviewed by its Planning and Engineering Departments and by its Planning Commission, and has fully considered recommendations made after such review and such recommendations as THE CITY finds appropriate are hereby attached in the form of conditions and incorporated by reference as if fully rewritten; and 0 WHEREAS, THE PORT has determined a willingness and ability to implement the aforementioned conditions in the course of its proposed development; and WHEREAS, THE PORT and THE CITY are willing to enter into an agreement for a contract rezone reclassifying the parcel from IP to GC and OS; now therefore, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1 In consideration of THE CITY reclassifying the subject property from IP to GC and OS, and for so long as the property remains so classified, THE PORT covenants as follows: A To develop the subject property in substantial accord with the development plan set forth in Attachment "A" (including additions thereto) attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, subject to the right to make minor revisions including but not limited to the following: 1.) The number, arrangement, and shape of buildings may be altered without increasing the gross floor area, general distribution of buildings, or significantly altering the looped circulation system; 2) Parking areas may be modified without reducing the number of spaces provided, the general distribution of spaces, or the amo►.nt of landscaping; 3) The number and arrangement of building service accesses (overhead doors, loading docks, etc.) may be altered so long as these service accesses are screened from both Dayton Street and State Route 104. Such mind- revisions shall be subject to approval by the Edmond's Department of Community Development. B To develop the subject property in accord ►vith the following development standards: 1) The minimum setback for buildings from Davton Street and State Route 1.04 shall be twenty five (25) feet; 2.) The minimum setback for parking from Dayton Street and State Route 1.04 shall be ten (1.0) feet; 3) All outdoor display of merchandise shall be subject to the same minimum setback as parking areas and the setback area shall he well landscaped; 2 4) All signs and advertising devices shall be subject to the requirements for signs located in a BC or IP zone pursuant to Title 20, SIGN CODE, of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines; 5) Outdoor storage and/or assembly areas shall be screened from Dayton Street and State Route 104 by a site obscuring fence or buffer pursuant �to Section 12.14.050(i) of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines; 6) All structures, fences and other architectural features shall be compatibly designed to give the overall development of the subject property unity and continuity. C To limit the land uses established on the subject property to those uses permitted by Section 12.13.270 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines, and subject to the following: 1) The following uses shall be prohibited: A) Automotive wrecking; B) Automotive sales; C) Automotive laundries; D) Drive-in Restaurants; E) Fuel storage .yards; F) Kennels; G) Motels; H) Mobile home parks; I) Service Stations; 2) The following uses shall be permitted: A) Small boat building, repair, and preparation, where such boats do not exceed sixty five (65) feet in length; B) Building, repair, and preparation of marine oriented merchandise and equipment; C) Boat sales and display areas; D) Temporary parking lots; E) Fabrication and sale of metal, wood, plastic, cloth, and similar products of light industry and specifically excluding fabrication of major structural steel forms, boiler making. and similar activities involving excessive noise, or major trucking in terms of over -standard dimensions per unit or over -standard weight of load, except for small boats; F) The Burlington Northern Railroad's existing use as a maintainance and repair facility. D That the northwest portion of the subject property used by the Burlington Northern Railroad will be fenced off from the remainder of the development to eliminate indiscriminate access across the railroad right of way. 3 E That all leases entered into by THE PORT shall be conditioned upon the lessee meeting or exceeding the performance standards established by Section 12.14.050 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines and not conducting activities in such a manner as to become a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood. F That that portion of the subject parcel from the south property line located within the "Union Oil" marsh to a line twenty five (25) feet landward from the edge of the marsh shall be zoned "Open Space" to protect the integrity of the marsh. . G That in order to allow for future expanded access to the edge of the marsh, THE PORT agrees to construct the following walkway at such time as THE CITY constructs a connecting walkway across the marsh from the south; A walkway paralleling S.R. 104 from the interior looped street to the south eastern corner of the subject parcel, and proceeding from there along the edge of the marsh to intersect with the existing path along the marsh in the central southern portion of the subject parcel. 2 THE CITY will cause the necessary ordinances to he enacted to rezone the subject property from IP to GC and OS for those uses as defined and permitted by the Edmonds Land Use Gui dell inesVand for such uses as are contemplated and intended by this agreement and the Attachments 3 Amendments to the development plan (Attachment "A") or this Agreement may be made with the consent of both THE PORT and THE CITY upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application. No applications shall be made by THE PORT or THE CITY or their successors or assigns to amend the underlying zoning of GC and OS for a period of two years from the date of this Agreement. Thereafter, either THE PORT or its successors or assigns, or THE CITY may, upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application, apply to amend or terminate the provisions and covenants of the Agreement or to change the zoning on said property. Said application to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall he heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other application for a rezone of property in the City of Edmonds. 4 THE CITY shall be under no obligation to issue THE PORT or its successors or assigns a building permit for improvements or expansion upon any of the subject property of THE PORT unless such improvements lie within the terms hereof and the applicable ordinances at the time of any application for building permit, or other permits or approvals. 5 The Edmond's Department of Community Development is granted authority to interpret and apply this agreement. Where there is uncertainty and/or disagreement concerning any substantive term of this agreement, including the Attachments, THE PORT may request that the matter be put on the next available agenda of City Council for a hearing and resolution of the disagreement. If THE PORT disagrees with the decision of City Council, the matter may be filed in the Snohomish County Superior Court as a Request for a Declaratory Judgment or other appropriate action. 4 6 This agreement and each part of it shall be considered covenants running with the land covered hereby and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of THE PORT and THE CITY. It shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the grantor/grantee index with THE PORT being listed as grantor and THE CITY as grantee and all costs of such recordation shall be paid by THE PORT. Such recordation and payment of said costs shall be a condition precedent to THE PORT exercising any rights under the terms of the agreement. 7 The terms of this agreement may be specifically enforced. If either party shall bring suit to enforce any of the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party may be awarded reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs in such amount as is set by the court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this contract this day of 1980. THE PORT OF EDMONDS By CHAIRMAN CITY OF EDMONDS By MAYOR ATTEST: EDMONDS CITY CLERK 5 AGREEMENT AND COVENANT CONSTITUTING A CONTRACT REZONE This Agreement contains the covenants entered into between THE PORT OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE PORT" and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE CITY". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, THE PORT proposes the development of an approximately 14.6 acre parcel of real property in Edmonds, located at the southwest corner of Dayton. Street and State Route 1.04, and being more specifically described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 42* 34' 34" east 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; VIA thence continuing north 42* 34' 34" east 731.1.8 feet �A to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line south �. 58* 17' 06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88* 42' 06" east 524.29 feet; thence south 41* 39' 17" east 110.49 feet to the right of way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. NO. 106375); thence south 1* 08' 54" west along said right of way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence south 73* 00' 00" west 240.00 feet; thence north 88* 30' 00" west 110.00 feet; thence north 66* 00' 00" west 140.00 feet; thence north 40* 00' 00" west 125.00 feet; thence north 1* 00' 00" west 200.00 feet; thence north 37* 00' 00" west 260.00 feet; thence south 71* 00' 00" west 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning. WHEREAS, THE PORT has applied for a change in the zoning of the subject property from its current IP classification to GC and OS; and WHEREAS, THE CITY has caused the application in its entirety, including, but not limiter) to the Environmental Impact Statement, to be reviewed by its Planning and Engineering Departments and by its Planning Commission, and has fully considered recommendations made after such review and such recommendations as THE CITY finds appropriate are hereby attached in the form of conditions and incorporated by reference as if fully rewritten; and WHEREAS, THE PORT has determined a willingness and ability to implement the aforementioned conditions in the course of its proposed development; and WHEREAS, THE PORT and THE CITY are willing to enter into an agreement for a contract rezone reclassifying the parcel from IP to GC and OS; now therefore, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I In consideration of THE CITY reclassifying the subject property from IP to GC and OS, and for so long as the property remains so classified., THE PORT covenants .as follows: ` A To develop the subject property in substantial accord with the development plan set forth in Attachment "A" (including additions thereto) attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, subject to the right to make minor revisions including but not limited to the following: 1) The number, arrangement, and shape of buildings may be altered without increasing the gross floor area, general distribution of buildings, or significantly altering the looped circulation system; 2) Parking areas may be modified without reducing the number of spaces provided, the general distribution of spaces, or the amount of landscaping; 3) The number and arrangement of building service accesses (overhead doors, loading docks, etc.) may be altered so long as these service accesses are screened from both Dayton Street and State Route 104. Such minor revisions shall be subject to approval by the Edmond s Department of Community Development. B To develop the subject property in accord with the following development standards: 1) The minimum setback for buildings from Dayton Street and State Route 104 shall be twenty five (25) feet; 2) The minimum setback for parking from Dayton Street and State Route 1.04 shall be ten (10) feet; 3) All outdoor display of merchandise shall be subject to the same minimum setback as parking areas and the setback area shall be well landscaped; 2 4) All signs and advertising devices shall be subject to the requirements for signs located in a BC or IP zone pursuant to Title 20, SIGN CODE, of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines; 5) Outdoor storage and/or assembly areas shall be screened from Dayton Street and State Route 104 by a site obscuring fence or buffer pursuant to Section 12.14.050(i) of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines; 6) All structures, fences and other architectural features shall be compatibly designed to give the overall development of the subject property unity and continuity. C. To limit the land uses established on the subject property to those uses permitted by Section 12.13.270 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines, and subject to the following: 1) The following uses shall be prohibited: A) Automotive wrecking; B) Automotive sales; C) Automotive laundries; D) Drive-in Restaurants; E) Fuel storage ,yards; F) Kennels; G) Motels; N) Mobile home parks; I) Service Stations; 2) The following additional uses shall be permitted: A) Small boat building, repair, and preparation, where such boats do not exceed sixty five (65) feet in length; B) Building, repair, and preparation of marine oriented merchandise and equipment; C) Boat sales and display areas; D) Temporary parking lots; E) Fabrication and sale of metal, wood, plastic, cloth, and similar products of light industry and specifically excluding fabrication of major structural steel forms, boiler making. and similar activities involving excessive noise, or major trucking in terms of over -standard dimensions per unit or over -standard weight of load, except for small boats; F) The Burlington Northern Railroad's existing use as a maintainance and repair facility. D That the northwest portion of the subject property used by the Burlington Northern Railroad will be fenced off from the remainder of the development to eliminate indiscriminate access across the railroad right of way. E That all leases entered into by THE PORT shall be conditioned upon the lessee meeting or exceeding the performance standards established by Section 12.14.050 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines and not conducting activities in such a manner as to become a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood. F That that portion of the subject parcel from the south property line located within the "Union Oil" marsh to a line twenty five (25) feet landward from'the edge of the marsh shall be zoned "Open Space" to protect the integrity of the marsh. G That in order -to allow for future expanded access to the edge of the marsh, THE PORT agrees to construct the following walkway at such time as THE CITY constructs a connecting walkway across the marsh from the south; A walkway paralleling S.R. 104 from the interior looped street to the south eastern corner of the subject parcel, and proceeding from there along the edge of the marsh to intersect with the existing path along the marsh in the central southern portion of the subject parcel. 2 THE CITY will cause the necessary ordinances to be enacted to rezone the subject property from IP to GC and OS for those uses as defined and permitted by the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines in effect at the time of this agreement, and for such uses as are contemplated and intended by this agreement and the Attachments 3 Amendments to the development plan (Attachment "A") or this Agreement may be made with the consent of both THE PORT and THE CITY upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application. No applications shall be made by THE PORT or THE CITY or their successors or assigns to amend the underlying zoning of GC and OS for a period of two 2 ,years from the date of this Agreement. Thereafter, either THE PORT or its successors or assigns, or THE CITY may, upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application, apply to amend or terminate the provisions and covenants of the Agreement or to change the zoning on said property. Said application to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other application for a rezone of property in the City of Edmonds. 4 THE CITY shall be under no obligation to issue THE PORT or its successors or assigns a building permit for improvements or expansion upon any of the subject property of THE PORT unless such improvements lie within the terms hereof and the applicable ordinances at the time of any application for building permit, or other permits or approvals. 5 The Edmond's Department of Community Development is granted authority to interpret and apply this agreement. Where there is uncertainty and/or disagreement concerning any substantive term of this agreement, including the Attachments, THE PORT may request that the matter be put on the next available agenda of City Council for a hearing and resolution of the disagreement. If THE PORT disagrees with the decision of City Council, the matter may be filed in the Snohomish County Superior Court as a Request for a Declaratory Judgment or other appropriate action. 4 6 This agreement and each part of it shall be considered covenants running with the land covered hereby and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of THE PORT and THE CITY. It shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the grantor/grantee index with THE PORT being listed as grantor and THE CITY as -grantee and all costs of such recordation shall be paid by THE PORT. Such recordation and payment of said costs shall be a condition precedent to THE PORT exercising any rights under the terms of the agreement. 7 The terms of this agreement may be specifically enforced. If either party shall bring suit to enforce any of the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party may be awarded reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs in such amount as is set by the court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this contract this day of 1979. THE PORT OF EDMONDS By CHAIRMAN CITY OF EDMONDS By MAYOR ATTEST: EDMONDSIT CLERK 5 :.f'tl�ar •'Sri}�` ."° ,'��s' ��MIIGIriCml�arp�....—�.s.-,.• .r..._ ar+v-nv:—^-,r._ .�'r"T _-;. hr�rn+e`m-^-'F-�.. _-.—'--+!-r�„+naaa,.:iwu4+R4iW�!S8$'�,.. •^ .�}, ,2� INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS DATE July 15, 19 83 TO Gary McComas/Fire Marshal I FROM Teresa Quigley/Planning Secretary ,Dan Smith/Engineering Inspector SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FILL .AND GRADING PARKING LOT AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF SR104.AND DAYTON STREET (CU=32-83) Please review the attached application and return your comments to Duane Bowman by July 25, 1983. This item will be considered at the August 4 Rearing Examiner meeting. Thanks! STgFfT F��E --- At No (, u- - <?j 1 Date 7�/,//<'3 Fee APO' S_ Rect. No. 1307 HEARING DATE S' 416e-►.fi L. OrRcx Po, amx 33g 3 APPLICANT: C.S(f 1 /9-55oe- A, e-5 ADDRESS „6t- ?A H 0 N E Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: U Gv " L r OWNER: 5 tLr4 C oa 5 030 ✓ e ADDRESS -PHONE.- LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) /V .Gc/, C-v f� KG r el � VA v -f-o !n S f 4- SRlo q LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 14)! ` L e fA e r( To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone �D Legal description checked and approved by: ate: VICINITY SKETCH Example: 0 CITY OF EDMONDS EDMONDS, WASHINGTON APPLICATION TO HEARING EWIINER FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXAMPLE, INDICATING NORTH. o. 0 Ga VAY4-o , 5t. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: Fi/a PLA iCS wti y-f-oa '"T ar k' io t• DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE: R5 As 4- to a ✓"oar V, lets o w en �► �.0 . a slw�.�: r.a c_er.ttr� lee rM1,IL 1^a f cc ow d_. _ l 1 A L 1 �. _ � 1 _ • 1 d FGS tr Ea �-i+Y1 ! K Gs tt to laC.f q e a t %% f o a. 5 V 4 Signature o pplicant, Owner or Representative RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of'insoection and posting attendant to this application. nature o App cant, er or Representative 0 r' ESC Associates P.O. Box 3383 Seattle, Wa. 98114 July 14, 1983 Hearing Examiner City of Edmonds RE: Conditional Use Permit-N.W. corner Dayton Street and SR 109 Attached are the permit application, environmental checklist, check for $65.00,.list of scope of work,fill wedge charts, elevations and related drawings related to the repair of the above referenced parking lot of the Edmonds Shopping Center. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Place granular pit run (all season) in deep fill areas and compact. 2. Top fill with 4" crushed rock for asphalt base. 3. Raise existing catch basins and control water on site to existing catch basins. 4. Pave with 2" class "TS" asphalt to property line and.feather to existing pavement and seal. 5. Restrip parking stall as required to match existing. Sincerely, Albert L. Dykes Manager General Partner ALD:ja encl. oz / tv - i ! � I I I I i 9 t7l ) I -- ---------- ----- sl 4- a tr i i co_"_---- — — SZ )� 1` c � � I l .\..� '21 Lw x Ez ram' i -- n�•Zt j _ .. Al i { L !- �7�G� �e� J4R0"l0�' _ p,Z� - -- --- � .--c,� - -- ----- ��e � - . _..._ .._ ., f - - - -. . aTh7-'-- ' � 4 r"7-% <� 3LoD� S Reid, Middleton b Associates, Inc. Engineers * Surveyors r Plonners C U T S H E E T 121 Sth Avenue No-th. Suite 200 /l Edmonds. Washington 98020 PROJECT 5�,, Q� c ,� 6,;�,.5•{' �/W _ JOB NO. OZ 43-I I(_ DATE DESCRIPTION Q u L P (,cJ tnQ o %'o�OSM SHEET / OF / �1 iL '�). T ? 2 r 2h G� Tb t, � 1 ,. F.B. k"tu -a- 2fcC �v✓,cL 0.S 1�bd JTa7tc+.�l �W `�y�C�,COMP p —t OFFSET ,® - CK'o MANHOLE STAT ION -+449�� CURB RET. -OR EXIST. GUTTER IN GRADE 1I?IW IT OR FINISH GRADE 9/60 /y. /o j CUT j FI LL I �,r,1i5H , 6eA{E- REMARKS g-P14 Gr O �O 3,�5- to0 Z / 6 Get Ti- �. Z+ i 717 3e / 3, 7 -/ V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent CSC �ssac_ Albew� L. lutes 6axewlOmen 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent p p- hex 33tt3 . Sec�fffe �(lih Q �f1y 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): G)E 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal %- 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): .4 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. - A2 0 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction the or overcovering of soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface 1 / relief features? V d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion L of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: V y 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? -2- 1; i • c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 1� t/ L1 L"I 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species L of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? L d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? Explanation: -3- w YES 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new Tight or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: MAYBE NO L/ -Z v C/ 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal resu t in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? v b. Depletion of any nonrenewable / natural resource? l/ Explanation: -4- • YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset.. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth ✓, rate of the human population of an area. Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: -5- YES MAYBE 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in as need new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: NO L LX -6- 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, objec-t or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO V L/ C-"", C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT: -7- s iY 11 1983 ENGINEERING July 8, 1983 Jim Adams Department of Engineering City of Edmonds Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Adams: Please be advised that we are scheduleing completion of paving. at the west and east entrances to Harbor Square within the next two weeks. In order to save possible additional expense to Harbor Square and the City of Edmonds, it is suggested that your department make the necessary extensions and installation of utilities for storm sewers, etc. prior to this time. incerely, C:: P'4'4-� Dick Beselin BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES w: _ cc: Mayor Harrison 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 Mitigating Measures Schools None proposed. Fire Protection FMoM�at �'. E.Z'S STREET FILE 1. Require buildings and other facilities constructed on the site to meet or exceed all currant fire and safety code requirements. 2. Provide Fire Department inspections of the project and its tenants on a regular basis. 3. Require gasoline containers in stored boats to meet local, State and Federal regulations. Police Protection purposes. On -site lighting should be provided for safety and security D. UTILITIES Existing Conditions Electricty Electrical service to the City of Edmonds is provided by the Snohomish County Public Utility District #1 PUD . The project site s not currently served by electricty, but service is available along 1Dayton Street. Officials at the PUD anticipate no capacity problems resulting from this proposed project. All on -site service will be underground. Solid Waste Several private refuse collection companies currently service the Edmonds area. Water Water is provided by the City of Edmonds, which derives its supply , from two major sources: the Seattle Water Department, and the Alderwood Water District. An 8-inch water main will supply the site. Water Pressure is approximately 130 pounds per square inch (psi), which is adequate for fire flows and on -site uses.' S ; Sewer service is provided by the City of Edmonds. Both Dayton Street and Admiral Way are serviced by 8-inch lines which drain into a pump station located near the site, adjacent to the Burlington Northern right of way and Dayton Street. Both the 8-inch lines and the pump station were designed in anticipation of this and other developments and have adequate capacities. �f 55 �.. SITE PLANNING DATA _ UNION OIL SITE o TOTAL LAND AREA: 14.61+ ACRES o BUILDABLE AREA: 13.78+ ACRES o GROUND FLOOR BUILDING AREA: 190,000 - square feet o LOT COVERAGE: (BUILDING) BUILDABLE SITE AREA: 32+0 .,TOTAL SITE AREA: 30+% o TOTAL AREA IN LANDSCAPING/OPEN SPACE: 110,000 s.f. PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SITE AREA: 17+ PERCENTAGE OF BUILDABLE SITE ARE EXCLUDING NON -BUILDABLE AREA: 12 LAND USE AREA(s.f.) PARKING REQUIRED MANUFACTURING 90,000 113 WAREHOUSING 58,000 10 RETAIL 40,000 133 OFFICES SERVING PUBLIC 10,000 25 NOT SERVING PUBLIC 33,000 42 231,000 323 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 323 I. Tenants for the property have not been secured therefore, total parking requirements are based on anticipated land uses. 'Precise parking re quirements would be established as part of the building permit process and would meet 'City of Edmonds parking requirements. LIMITATION OF LAND USES It,is the intent of•the Port to provide a compatable mix of land uses on the site including light manufacturing and warehousing, retail, and office uses. In order to assure. that incompatiable land uses are not allowed to occur on the site, the Port -agrees that only the following uses of land will occur: , A. Manufacturing: Including such uses as - 1. Small boat building, where such' boats do not exceed 80' 'in length 2. Cabinet shops and similar wood products manufacturing, but excluding saw mills or planning mills 3• Light metal fabrication 4. Electronic and electrical products assembly 5. Clothing and garment manufacturing 6. Other uses.simi,l'ar to those listed above which, in the opinion of the .-Planning Director, would not adversely affect surrounding property due to dust, odor, noise vibration, or g.lare;.but specifically excluding the following: a) Distillation of bone b) Fat rendering c) Manufacture of acid,.cement, chemicals, explosives or fire works, fertilizer, gas, glue,.gypsum, lime, or plaster of paris d) The reduction, canning, or processing of fish or animal products of an kind P any. kind such reduction, canning or pro- cessing may emit any odor outside of the.building in which the use is being conducted e) Smelting of ore f) Stockyard or slaughter of animals B. Warehouses, distribution centers and accessory storage, including freight handling, but excluding the handling or explosives or fire works. C. Paint shop, spray or other; provided operation is carried on entirely indoors and thatvent-carried paint residues shall fall only within the 'limits of the establishments property. D. Laboratories and research organizations. E. Retai-1 and business uses, except that the total combined building square footage of all such uses shall not exceed 25% of the total square footage of all buildings on the site. In addition, the following uses shall not be permitted. 1) automobile sales 2) automotive wrecking yards 3) drive-in movie theaters F. Municipal and public utility structures and facilities G. Business offices, professional offices and .clinics and.other professional o(personal services to the individual or community excluding Kennels.. Further, due to their incompatability with those uses being proposed for the site and the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, the following additional uses shall not be permitted: A. Mobile home parks or trailer parks l\ June 22, 1979 :DEMO TO: John LaTourelle Director of Community Development FROM: Fred F. Herzberg, P.E. City Engineer SUBJECT: PORT OF EDMONDS CONTRACT REZONE R-4-79 We find the information on traffic impacts submitted by the applicant to be.incomplete. We need traffic information on the entire Port development, especially primary impacts caused by the rezone and secondary impacts on Railroad Avenue and Admiral Way. WJN:FFH:kir TE dt. Asst. CE t. in. . P.W. Dir. dt. STREET FILE • s RECEIVED PORT OF EDMONDS INTUSTRIAL PARK REZONE PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT.OF TRAFFIC IMPACTS TRAFFIC GENERATION JUN 12'79 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEPT. ki_� The proposed rezone of'the Port of Edmonds property (1.4.61 acres) from Industrial Park (I-P) to General Commercial (CG) will create the potential.for greater daily traffic in the area. As discussed in the Environmental Checklist . Supplement, the development of the site as an Industrial Park will generate up to 2,656 total daily trips. The Business Park proposed for the site through the contract rezone may generate a maximum daily traffic of 4,588. The additional traffic generated by the proposed business park is attributable to the introduc- tion of retail land uses on the site. These uses could not locate here under the present I-P zoning. The Port of Edmonds Master Plan (May, 1979) indicates that a maximum of 100,000 square feet of space on the site could be potentially filled with existing downtown Edmonds businesses, which would be relocating to the site from existing quarters in the area.. Many of these potential tenants of the proposed business park are now located at the marina immediately west of the project site. A majority of the future traffic generated by these businesses already exists on Dayton Street, Railroad Avenue, and.Admiral Way. Their re- location to the proposed Business Park site will decrease traffic somewhat on Admiral Way and Railroad Avenue, but should not affect traffic on Dayton Street. A majority of the traffic'to and from these businesses .alreadj .uses Dayton Street. A 'recent (May, .1979) application for funds to the Federal Economic Development Administration,. submitted by the Port, predicts that of the total new jobs created by the proposed Business Park, about 20% would consist of relocated local jobs in existing downtown Edmonds businesses. Without the rezoning of the site the relocation of these businesses would not be possible. From these figures we can assume that about 20% of the total trips generated by the proposed project already exist in Edmonds. Therefore the total. impact of the rezone will be to increase daily traffic from 2,656 i (projected traffic from an Industrial Park) to 3,670 (accounting for the re- located businesses). This net increase in traffic represents about 38% over levels expected under the I-P zone. About 500 - 600 of these daily trips will be commute trips by employees generally occurring during the hours,of 7-8 a.m. and 5-6 p.m. The remaining 3,000 trips + will.be associated with truck shipping and.delivering, and traffic generated by retail and office uses on the site. The following analysis uses - the maximum traffic of 4,588 daily trips as a worst case assumption. TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION In order to assess the impact of the project we must make some assumptions as.to the predicted distribution of the daily traffic on various streets. The two access points to the site are on the south side of Dayton Street between SR 104 and Railroad Avenue. Vehicles travelling to and from the site are assumed to be distributed as follows (see Figures 1 & 2): Dayton Street west 459 ("109) Dayton Street east 4,129 (90%) TOTAL: 41,588 Tfie`.459'average daily trips which will arrive at and leave the site using Dayton Street west of the site will ave no significant impact on Lra M-5- flow in the City. The 4,129 daily trips using Dayton Street east of the site wil C utilize the existing traffic signal at. the intersection of Dayton Street and SR 104. FI-om this point the 4,129 trips are assumed to be distributed as: follows (see Figures 1 & 2): SR 104 north: 413 00%) SR 104 south: 2,890 (70%) Dayton Street east: 826 (20%) TOTAL: 4,129 West of the site East of the site The traffic using SR 104 north of the intersection (413 ADT) and the traff.i.c using Dayton -Street east of.the intersection (826 ADT) are not considered to be significant from a traffic impact standpoint. The remaining 2,890 trips per day will turn right from Dayton Street onto SR 104 south bound or will turn left from SR 104 onto Dayton Street westbound. TRAFFIC FLOW As shown on Figures 1 and 2, the majority of the traffic generated by the project will use SR 104 south of its intersection with Dayton Street. The 2,890 daily vehicle trips referred to here will use the existing traffic signal at that location. Arriving vehicles will be required to turn left at the signal onto Dayton Street, then turn left from Dayton .Street into the site. Existing vehicles will simply make two right hand turns, one from the site onto Dayton Street and then again onto SR 104 southbound. The other potential turning movements created by the. project will not impact traffic significantly due to their smal-1 number and the low numbers of traffic on existing streets. The City of Edmonds has no recent traffic count data for either Dayton Street or SR 104. The most recent data collected by the State for SR 104 was done in 1977. At that time average daily traffic on SR 104, just south of .Dayton Street was 5YOO vehicles. Total daily traffic for the period of 1974 = 1977 was as follows: YEAR ADT J "V �J l 1974 3,600 1975 4,300 1976 4,600 1977 5,100 Using past growth trends up to 1977 and State ferry information for the Edmonds - Kingston and Edmonds'- Port To ferry crossings the average daily traffic on Sk 104 just south:of Dayton Street is about 6,000 vehicles in 1979. Many of these vehicles (approximately"2,500) are enroute to or from the ferries. For this reason much of the traffic tends to bunch up corresponding to the loading and unloading -of the ferries. According to the State Ferry System, Friday is the busiest day, with Saturday and Sunday normally second and third. The remaining weekdays have significantly less traffic. Traffic on SR 104, being heavily impacted by ferry traffic, tends to have heavy or light traffic based on�the business of the ferry system. Traffic.from the proposed project would have two peak periods, during the morning and afternoon commutes by the 250 employees. The remaining daily traffic would be spread throughout the day, and would mainly occur on weekdays. Some retail businesses on the site (such as'boat sales).may operate on weekends, but a vast majority of the complex will•be closed. This should tend to minimize possible conflicts with ferry traffic and traffic.to the Edmonds Marina, which mainly occurs on weekends and evenings. The proposed project will create up to 1,445 new daily' vehicle trips turning right southbound onto SR 104. This will add to the present 3,000+ vehicle trips southbound on this portion of SR 104. With the existing traffic signal these right turning vehicles (and the 413 through trips on Dayton and the 206 left turning vehicles north onto.SR 104) will not cause any significant traffic impacts in the area. The existing southbound through traffic on SR 104 can use the left lane south of the intersection, and the right .turning.vehicles southbound onto SR 104 can use the right lane. This .provides two lanes of roadway accepting two incoming lanes of traffic, one of which is regulated by the signal, the other regulated by the right turn. Northbound traffic on SR 104 to the site will separate from ferry -bound traffic by using the:left lane approaching the Dayton Street intersection, wit0erry traffic using the right travel lane and the newly installed holding lane to the east. Left turning vehicles from SR 104 onto Dayton Street west-, bound must yield to southbound th'rough traffic on SR 104. Unless a ferry has Just docked this.left turn should be ea.sily made. Traffic headed into the proposed development must then turn left into the site from Dayton Street. This traffic could conflict with existing traffic turning left and right from Dayton Street into the Safeway parking area. A two-way left turn lane along this portion of Dayton could potentially serve the future turning movement needs of both the proposed project and land uses north of Dayton. In addition, left turns into.and out of the project site could be restricted by signing and/or street striping to reduce potential conflicts. Neither the .existing traffic volumes and street conditions, nor the projected traffic and turning movements appear to present significant impacts to the City. Potential conflicts are resolved by either the proposed site. plan, by existing street improvements and.designs, or could be incorporated into other on -or off -site improvements. 0 F. i g u r.e Proposed Business Park, Traffic .(Entering Trips Dayton St.. 1 033 1 032 114 115 Note: For purposes of this analysis traffic to and from the site is assumed to be split 50-50 between the two entrances. Fi9 ure 2 Proposed Business Park :Traffic (Exiting Trips Dayton St. 1 032 1 032 I ��- SITE Nv-lc:i t:IaJLSVLAJ )00000 r SONOVYO.a --jo JLI:locj :)-O000c 00000 30000C CrIO-0-0-C-0-0,-0-0-0-0 0 0 0 u 00000 000OCC000.000000 00000000000000 )00000 )00000000000000 000000000u000000000000000c)c)oo oc000t 00000 OOOCOOCO<)000000 0000000000orl tio )o oc0000c000coo.0000000000000000000000000 00000000006',Izi J000 I)o 10 c�O�OCCCO000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000;,�P.t 0 0 0---.,00000000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOOOOOCOOor, 01010, 0 01.11)o 0000��C�.O00000000000c0000n OOOCOOC.o( 000001 ------- o C000rl- 0 0 0 (sa DC op )o 0000000000��6000001 1001clo -00000000000000 0 ae 0 0;�-Crd -" C 0 . . . oor, 000or -0001000000000(0000 .00 :M -J0000000000000000000000000000C 000 "0 UOOOOOOOOOO coo,'( 10000000000000600000000000000, )or Ilk )0000 poop 0000000000c o0oo ?OOOOOOOOOOOC 00 00000000000Q,g c 000000OCCO, 0 0 0 cl )0000000- 10000 0000000 Qc-GO0000000000cc, -.P. 00000 1 0000000000000 00000 000000000000000,010 00000 300000000000000.0.r Joc000 C, 0, 0� 0O 00000000000 100000 T .?0000000000000000 J000000 10000000000000000o"o I Cp,r '000000 :,00000000000000- 7 0000000 J�;C00000ll 000000000 00000- nocc0000coc 000 1000oocco- J0000000c :Z 01 )OICO '0000c'-, .0N, ppGpd 601.01.01,20 0 0 0 0 0 4p 00000000000 oc000d00000 "M 30000000 000 JL I 10 -0000 .11 00 )00000000000 000000 (0-40 �000 ( 0� C? )OOOOCC OCOOOO (o o 0 c-4 Oor :)Occo 00000 00-0 0 00 0() o 0 A 00 C)co C3 10 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 nry I lo 0000 t- 'o o Oo Oo 0, 0 00 0 001, Ic 0 0 00 0o0 0 o 0 0 OpvOY c 0 0 '0 c0o00oo 0 0 ,6 0 00 0 cc0 0 oo 00 0 -0 0 0 YC 6L -'o' o I O$z �o 6,00 o D., 00 0 0,C) 0, C: 00 0 oo 0 0 C o 0 'o o o 0 0 O 0 0 00 00 0 0 0-000 oo 00,00 oo r 0 0 0 0 orr .. o 0 cc 0,- 00 or 00 yG \�•� i Q; III t 0 0 00 00 c c 0 F� af-o 0 0, 0 0 6 * (��O--Q n� III ck- 0oPOO 0 0 0 (:�',b - 0 0 . - 0 CO OCG ly -00000 0 0 C C C., OCCOC, OVOU .......... UVLN Wl-LNaC3lSB3tj Oa-LV-IaU -VNI IS 15� .............. .."a 0..% ®NV' LNMSMd2=!d E: ejn6g • CITY OF E ®M ®N ®S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 250. 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.1202 d OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER DATE: FILE NO.: PROJECT NO.: SERIAL NO.: (If Applicable) To: Z)/C I l�ESEG/'tl 30cf) TRANSMITTING: As you requested For your information As we discussed For appropriate action For your file For posting in public place For signature and return REMARKS: st 12/82 (� It'll IN `,I I I I "ON, 51 i� I l )1 V%, A"I 111'4l DEPARTMENT 01" 1 I AI'-� I ORI ATION i )laic tr nl 1 ))>Iru 1 .•ldm//uyli,)Icx' 0 1 ) - 1, (A3 1 (.cax)lI 1l r. Su ( N i•I 10 ') St`dlllEr, W'uhin�;lun `J8I0(t Mr. Vic Sood, Director Community Transit 4208 - 198th Street S.W. Suite 201 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Dear. Mr. Sood: March 30, 1983 SR 104 Harbor Square, Edmonds I )UAN1 M I(LN 15( )I "a•( i riot i .�C AprR 01 W3 P.T. B. A. Thank you for your letter concerning the potential for parking problems at the Harbor Square Development near SR 104 and Dayton Street in Edmonds. You indicated that ferry commuter parking and transit park and ride users could overflow into -the Harbor Square parking area. We do not believe that ferry commuters or transit park and riders will cause a parking problem at Harbor Square. As you know, several years ago the Department of Transportation con- structed the parking facility for ferry commuters which is now operated by the City of Edmonds. In addition,,the studies which led to selection of the site for the Edmonds park and ride lot indicated that the area near Harbor Square would not be a likely gathering spot for transit park and ride users. We do, however, wish to assure you that, if transit park and riders do become a problem, portions of SR 104 right of way could be made available to local agencies or Community Transit for construction of parking. We cannot commit to assuming the lead for such a project at this time, however. In the event that ferry commuters cause a problem at Harbor Square, one solution which should be considered would be to provide co- ordinated Community Transit service between the ferry terminal and the Edmonds or Lynnwood park and ride lots. This would provide a convenient place for over -night ferry commuter parking at the park and ride lot at a time when adequate space is available. Mr. Vic Sood SR 104 - Harbor Square, Edmonds March 30, 1983 Page Two This would also provide the ability to transfer to other CT and Metro routes and would increase the likelihood of ferry commuters using public transportation instead of the automobile. In any event, the Marine Division of the Department of Transportation is committed to working with the community to resolve any park- ing problems which are caused by ferry commuters. I am hopeful that the availability of this land, together with the commitment to work with the community in the event that a problem does materialize, will satisfy your concerns. Very truly yours, RON E. BOCKSTRUCK, P.E. REB:77 District Administrator CC: frank Campo, Mgr. Safeway Dick Beselin, Harbor Square Bill Auerswold, Port Manager, Port of Edmonds Jim Adams, City Engineer, City of Edmonds Don Nutter, Marine Division _ t r go CITY OF E13MOP40S 250 - 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771 3202 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER June 6, 1983 Randy Sleight RMA 121 - 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Dear Randy: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Attached is a letter from Dick Beselin of Beselin/Hovde Associates to Mayor Harrison regarding Dayton Street improvements. to addition to this letter, Mr. Beselin has complained regarding us keeping him informed on the proposed improvements to Dayton Street. . Our position is that all current drawings are preliminary plans and are subject to any reasonable change to accommodate both the Harbor Square Development and the Safeway property. We do not intend to proceed until the Harbor Square Development submits their plans for. approval. As the Harbor Square engineer, will you please submit their plans for curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for City approval, and as the engineer for the City, please refer any questions from Mr. Beselin to either me or Jerry Hauth. Sincerely, a y 3JA E S E. S, P.E. Engineer JEA/st Attachment STREET FILE M r' �,X;;(;uliVB UILce� , April 15, 1983 Harve` Harrison Mayor,, , ) t City.. ::of Edmonds ' 'Edmond , WA,, 98020' Dear: !Mayor Harrison: Needless to say we are most disappointed in the manner in which the City has taken upon itself to initiate a design for Dayton Street Improv%ments without the input of Harbor Square, the Port of Edmonds, or -Al Dykes of Safeway. Apparently the City has assumed that approval for the Q encroachment onto Harbor Square and the resulting, sidewalk on the south side of Dayton was not necessary prior to design by Reid, Middleton. In order to correct this situa- tion and to redesign to narrower dimensions, it would cause an additional expense to the City of approximately $3,000. In consideration of time and further expense to ourselves, the City, and Al Dykes, we have reconsidered the Present Plan with the proposed widened traffic lanes. The net result is that we will agree to the widened street concept if the following conditions are agreed to by the City: 1. The City will provide Harbor Square with necessary site plan showing curb elevation, sidewalks and entrance 'radius' necessary for approval by the Department of Engineering. 2. The City will provide staking as required to install the above. 3. The City will, at their expense, pay for all paving necessary with the -right-of-way. 4. The City will obtain commitment from the Department of Transportation (with our acceptance) a resolution to future parking needs as expressed by letter from Community Transit to the Department of Transportation CV, on March 15, 1983. 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, E?dmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 Harbor Square will in return agree to the following: 1. Pay for 7' sidewalk, curbs, and gutters abuting the property line on Dayton Street. 2. Give its approval and obtain Port approval to encroach onto Port property to accommodate Community Transit turnout and the abuting sidewalks. is. -a fair compromise in lightof: our willing- ess:;-t*d;;-.accommodate'a :bus turnout and sidewalk�."which nedess'ita'tes`the'". use of "property �'square has"' p perty which Harbor_ u er. ease with ith the Port of Edmonds. Your earliest consideration and reply would be most appreciated as we are ready to proceed with the above improvements to the south side of Dayton Street. Sincerely, Dick Beselin- BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES DB: sb 4 1.1,11 d"t April 5, 1983 File No. 02-82-065-005-01 Mr. James E. Adams City Engineer City of Edmonds Community Services Building Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers* Surveyors- Plonners KEDEIVED pp R A.1 1983 ENGIC�I=EKING Subject: Development Plan for Harbor Square and Dayton Street Improvements Dear Jim: Pursuant to a meeting this morning with Mr. Dick Beselin of Harbor Square,, we have been requested to inform you of the. Harbor Square Development acceptance of the present Dayton Street design, subject to a request for the following modifications and provisions: 1. Revise the traffic islands to be constructed with traffic buttons rather than the raised curbs -as shown on the present design. 2. Reduce the south sidewalk on Dayton Street to 7 feet in width from the face of the proposed curb line. 3. Enlarge the east radius of the west entrance to Harbor Square, removing the existing poplar tree. Shift the curb line south on the east side of the west entrance so that the back of the sidewalk is on the right-of-way line. This new curb line position, where the proposed bus turnout will be constructed, will be subject to review by the City's Traffic Engineer (see attached sketch). 4. The City accept the responsibility for the paving and finish grading of the bus turnout as well as the cost for making these revisions and modifications to the Dayton Street design., All the above are conditional upon favorable written response from the Washington State Department of Transportation to the parking/transit issue on Dayton Street. Mr. Beselin has stated that the Port of Edmonds is in concurrence with this STREET FILE 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775.3434 ...'�". ae,-. c9++�•.•w6�.>..,. �. iw,�.-..r.:%hctiip�,.,F�3a�a.w,...:.:..ddki...�..:._.;; .,5. ��....:,,�aw.�.:,.. n,;;. .. �...'.. �,: t__.. .. ... -. e.a tl�d:�ti:e 00 CITY OF EDMO DS 700 MAIN ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775 2525 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT April 4, 1983 Jan van Niel and Members Pilchuck Audubon Society P.O. Box 1618 Everett, Washington 98206 STRt:Eft- ET FILE Dear President van Niel and Members: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR AeR 0 5 �y�3 CITY oF. Ic"" os Thank you for your letter of concern regarding wildlife in the Union Oil Marsh. I have enclosed an excerpt from the Harbor Square Environmental Impact Statement. You will find that an oil/water separator is part of the Harbor Square storm water drainage system. The separator will, if properly maintained, keep oil and git _from_enterinq the marsh. ' 3e owners o the deveop lment are- - re �s.p.Qnsible for the maintenance;of the 'eq:uipment. The policy of the City is to leave the marsh in its natural state. I know of nothing that might change that policy. I will tell you if any changes are proposed. I would appreciate a letter or a call from you if you notice any damage to the marsh from the Harbor Square development. Si acgrely, Step e 0. Simpson. irector Parks and Recreation Department SOS/mw Attachment cc.Mary L "o Block. P'lanninq birector Ken Mattson Planning Board CITY OF E ®M ® 0 ® S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 1, 1983 Mr. Dick Beselin Beselin/Hovde Associates 300 Admiral Way, Ste. 204 Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Harbor Square Development Dear Dick: It seems that there are a number of issues that remain unresolved in conjunction with your development of Harbor Square. Before any addi- tional buildings are approved for construction, certain of these mat- ters must be addressed and resolved. Development Plan An overall development plan is required for the entire site. This plan must include all improvements along the south side of Dayton Street, the interior pedestrian facilities, and the walkway to the Marsh. In addition, a landscape plan is necessary for those areas not included in the individual building plans. Exchanqe of Easements You mentioned an exchange of an easement for the viewing platform on the Marsh berm for one of equal size on the City -owned property at the corner of SR104 and Dayton Street. We would be interested in pursuing this concept, if you will provide details as to what provisions you would like to have included in such an agreement. It will then be referred to the City Attorney. Architectural Design Board Approvals I understand that certain buildings have site and elevation approval, but no landscaping approval. This process must be completed. STREET FILE 0 Mr. Dick Beselin April 1, 1983 Page 2 We are anxious -to see these issues resolved, so they do not cause delay in the completion of your project. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-3202, extension 255. Sincerely, MARY LOU LOCK Planning irector MLB/tq cc: Jim Adams VF JOI IN W1 I I MAN ( IL vri I 1l)1 ps', -).d Z SfA1L (N bVA`JIIN(.1'.)N DEPAwrMENT OF TRANSF'OR"FATION UI'I'ic e of I )istricl Adnunismilor a 0-1, b43 i Corson Ave. So.; (.'-8 P110 v Seallk`, Washington 98108 March 30, 1983 I )IJANE If[KLN 15()N•! 5em-hu y Mr. Vic Soud, Director h;;` Community Transit 4208 - 198th Street S.W. Pry 011983 Suite 201 Lynnwood, WA 98036 P- T. B. A. SR 104 Harbor Square, Edmonds Dear Mr. Sood: Thank you for your letter concerning the potential for parking problems at the Harbor Square Development near SR 104 and Dayton Street in Edmonds. You indicated that ferry commuter parking and .transit park and ride users could overflow into the Harbor Square parking area. We do not believe that ferry commuters or transit park and riders will cause a parking problem at Harbor Square. As you know, several years ago the Department of Transportation con- structed the parking facility for ferry commuters which is now operated by the City of Edmonds. In addition,,the studies which led to selection of the site for the Edmonds park and ride lot indicated that the area near Harbor Square would not be a likely gathering spot for transit park and ride users. We do, however, wish to assure you that, if transit park and riders do become a problem, portions of SR 104 right of way could be made available to local agencies or Community Transit for construction of parking. We cannot commit to assuming the lead for such a project at this time, however. In the event that ferry commuters cause a problem at Harbor Square, one solution which should be considered would be to provide co- ordinated Community Transit service between the ferry terminal and the Edmonds or Lynnwood park and ride lots. This would provide a convenient place for over -night ferry commuter parking at the park and ride lot at a time when adequate space is available. STREET FILE Mr. Vic Sood SR 104 - Harbor March 30, 1983 Page Two Square, Edmonds This would also provide the ability to transfer to other CT and Metro routes and would increase the likelihood of ferry commuters using public transportation instead of the automobile. In any event, the Marine Division of the Department of Transportation is committed to working with the community to resolve any park- ing problems which are caused by ferry commuters. I am hopeful that the availability of this land, together with the commitment to work with the community in the event that a problem does materialize, will satisfy your concerns. Very truly yours, RON E. BOCKSTRUCK� P.E. District Administrator REB:jj -7 Zv cc: Frank Campo, Mgr. Safeway Dick Beselin, Harbor Square Bill Auerswold, Port Manager, Port of Edmonds Jim Adams, City Engineer, City of Edmonds Don Nutter, Marine Division ,I✓ CITY OF EDMONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER Gordon Maxwell President of the Port Commission Port of Edmonds Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Dear Mr. Maxwell: March 10, 1983 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR STREET FILE Enclosed is our check for $18,600 and a copy of the signed agreement. Please note that I replaced your Exhibit "B" with the drawing of the storm sewer. sincerely, J ;S E. , P.E. 1 y Engineer JEA/st Enclosures gr �^ •J: FILE NO. 05.2.02 March 9, 1983 MEMO TO: Irene Varney Moran City Clerk FROM: James E. Adams City Engineer SUBJECT: PORT OF EDMONDS/HARBOR SQUARE EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Attached for your file is the original copy of the subject agreement. I mailed a copy of the agreement and the check for $18,600 to the Port today. JEA/st Attachment v- 'c'-vTy op IN CITY OF EDMONDS EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 VENDOR'S NA"ME Port of Edmonds WARRANTS PAYABLE THROUGH PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK EDMONDS, WASHING.0,1. PAY TO THE ORDER OF VOUCHER PURCHASE UMBER ORDER 3078 9 30782 AMOUNT $18,600.00 IENI D,,TE 3-9-83 VOUCHER I PURCHASE NUMBER ORDER AMOUNT '.'✓ARRANT NO. REMITTANCE TOTAL V 30586 $18,600.00 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 TO THE TREASURER OF EDMONDS DATE WARRANT NO. 3-9-83 l V 30586 . ........... 19-10/033 1250 CLAIMS FUND PAY AMOUNT 8,600. 00* 1-05 STORM WATER AND POTABLE WATER MAIN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This Agreement made on this date between the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City," the Port of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as "Port," and Beselin/Hovde Associates, a partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Beselin/Hovde." WHEREAS, the Port has leased to Beselin/Hovde certain real property located in the City of Edmonds, more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, for a fifty (50) year term, and WHEREAS, Beselin/Hovde are engaged in developing the said property as a business park, and WHEREAS, in connection with said development Beselin/Hovde is required to provide water drainage and retention facilities in accordance with applicable Edmonds City Codes, and , WHEREAS, the City is concerned with implementing a comprehensive drainage plan to alleviate the problems of storm water run-off in the area and to alleviate the flooding conditions which occur on Dayton Street to the north of the subject property as well as private property surrounding Dayton Street to the north of the subject property, and WHEREAS, Beselin/Hovde has offered to -oversize the storm water lines in their drainage facilities to accommodate the increased flow of surface water from both public and private property located upstream from the subject property in exchange for the City's purchase of easement and agreement to maintain storm sewer lines and potable water main, and WHEREAS, the City will be able to save substantial sums by purchasing easement and drainage facilities, and WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase the storm water facilities now in place on the property to assure proper maintenance of the said facilities; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES AND COVENANTS, the parties agree as follows: 1. (a) Storm Drainage Easement. The Port and Beselin/Hovde hereby grant to the City a perpetual ten foot (10') easement in, over and on the easement property described on Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The easement shall be for operation, maintenance and repair of the surface water drainage and retention facilities therein. 1. (b) Potable Water Main Easement. The Port and Beselin/Hovde hereby grant to the City a perpetual ten foot (101) easement, in, over, and on the ease- ment property described in Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. This easement shall be for the operation, maintenance and repair of a potable water main now in place in the described easement. 2. City to Maintain and Repair. The City shall have the permanent obligation to maintain, repair and/or reconstruct, the storm water lines and the potable water main at its sole expense. 3. Right of Entry. The City shall have the right, without prior institution of suit or proceeding at law, at times that it may deem reasonably necessary, to enter upon the easements heretofore described for the purpose of repairing, altering or reconstructing the storm water lines and the potable water main, without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor, provided that any improvements existing in the easements shall be.immediately replaced by City in as good a condition as they were immediately before entry by the City. 4. Covenant Running With Land. The easements herein granted and the rights and obligations herein created shall be permanent and shall be a covenant running with the land and the rights and obligations of the parties herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, successors and assigns including without limitation all subsequent owners, lessees, tenants and subtenants and all other persons claiming under them. 5. Compensation. The City shall pay to the Port and Beselin/Hovde the sum of Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($18,600) in full consideration for the grant of the easements herein. 6. Abandonment. -2- Should all parties at any time abandon the use of either easement such easement shall be terminated. This provision shall not be interpreted to mean that either party may individually terminate this agreement or its responsibilities in this agreement. 7. Enforcement. Should any of the parties be required to take legal action to enforce any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all its costs and expenses incurred therein, including the sums as and for reasonable attorney fees. DATED this 9�day of MAP-C H , 1983. CITY OF EDMONDS PORT OF EDMONDS WBY #�lBY Harve arrison, Mayor Go on Psaxwell, President o the Port Commission ATTEST: Irene Varney Morana City Clerk -3- ATTEST: Rclg' -ram bs, Secretary of the Porl Commission BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES, A P-artner hi Dick Beselin, a Partner By Kenneth A. Hovde, a Partner STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this `j day of . , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,. duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared HARVE H. HARRISON and IRENE VARNEY MORAN, to me known to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Edmonds, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. Ndtary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at I STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day of��h2 , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared GORDON r.AXWELL and ROGER STUBBS, to me known to be the President and Secretary of the Port Commission, respectively, of the Port of Edmonds, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my handand official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. y Public in and fo 'State shington, Residin�""V-)` -4- STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day of , 1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pub is in ancY for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared DICK BESELIN and KENNETH A. HOVDE, a partnership, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the said individual partners, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the said partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. f -5- y Yubuic in ana for shington, Residing Stat That portion of Government 'Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the i Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way N42°34'34", 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N42034'34"E, 731�.18 i feet to the southerly right-of-way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right-of-way line S58°17106"E, 12.54 feet; thence S88°42'06"E, 524.29 feet; thence S41039117"E, 110.49 feet to the westerly right-of-way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. No. 106375); thence I S1008154"W along said westerly right-of-way a distance of 562.54 feet; thence N88°42'06"W, 422.56 feet; thence N43042'06"11, 120.00 feet; thence S46°17'54"W, 70.00 feet; thence N37°00'00"W, 260.00 feet; thence S71°00100"W, I 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in Snohomish County, Washington. 1. EX#[D7jT A au ai.(t Dart er .1 Ta N a�. WO OE s� L] 6 �s scvr>tr ua[ OF serraw ty It%ooltclreo Ci7tTll'1C�1TIt 3 212 J 3 5, 6 • �' sear r rI rroa ...s■ ry w�.o n . - Iai0Oda1 Or_ S!!d1[f113r p...��,'�. w.�iTO► R elivs a Vs® J AO/•e wr 16 RNA!£ NT .;# r. SM." L O T 1,li.`,�'- 3 e STOM wwa HV CAO[rtrT S .e•ONA A . !al Lf"L OEBC "001 Ill" pwt/• of Owe . Lt f. 7.K10 n. Ta comp n tst ftr. !.w ) Wt. r.IL. dwKrI d as hllew; Co eact" at W Istarsectlo of the Soso Ilw N Sttlo tf, Ind On easterly r7lot-of-cal lloo H me Oeri1.rtoo a ►ftom ®Ilrws; Lsecs alo" "Id sss. IF rlQit-ef-a y OW34•34'11. 616.77 Awt to _ to tssa 110141, M t"tENWtM; Lop costloten Mt'3*13". M.ls Mt to the assLerif ►t� t.at-ay of ORY"m Strut; Luca .ls" M1d twtlrrl) riot of w llp SSS"WWI. 12.s/ feet; ttaacs 30s'e2.00�t. Sri.?/ Mt; Lecs S0�"A'ITt. 110.49 hot is La aesterlf r1+t-4t..wr Of SO-104 (as caedowles arhr S.C.C. L. 1116M); tltsce 51'0'541I &I" said wsterir rlpt-sr-ot a Ilstsace of ssZ.st hot; thance 1111111'42.0611. KZ.M Mt; duce *W4r•I5,, It0.0 fat; tfoce Ss0'17•Stb. 70.00 hot: tloco OS7'00•WV. =.a ew t—. Illowe sn"O wv; an." etat L as tree plot of bwosls0. i•� w •slrahf . •.dam F. LAIC) O.. Q � o at,a,rts,rotes aoTTlnc�►TQ � Ilw ae4 i v Ow00 . "oow ua� w e�cTsow a co—vo—w w ew .e� w T.w �mnr .c►......ewrrws. lldCi -�[�rL . � oari.usra ,•� 11ZL�nc�-. i s>'trsat► • • sae. COPY• wM4 ON FU ul Tit COORrf ruorre" pMW IOd I / b. 0 1 l 11..J I Iw STORM SEWER ESM'T. SURVEY FOR I HOVDE — ®ESELIN IN WV T. LOT 3. SEC: M TWR YT X_ RIM 3 [-. VE15. L169*0 Ctt1 07 EOMO70OS, MOMClr1EN COUNTY. WAS1111116TO01 Re4d. MBddletofl (7 ASSodates, Inc. Mwir[s ad 5mm 0 EngheeTa " uo-i,— a OlQfrteTs d 11MUM [AaauwT qt So AO. Is. >r 3M tATa1d VA OW I aua IT." DEPT. OF .nu•w•Tf N 0 , + �e V / '--T. P.0.B ti�t'6 6't SOUPN L/A'E• OF Scrr/QV 13 •' f1ECORDIMG Ct_RTIi1GTE J212C ? ) � 1 i hem ron ■eeo•ro �LE a o_ ATJ& ruwr,•• r�.T_.�L_o^auca.�..•,a we o SURYETS weWrme nr SAyONOMISN 1+••rT. � N.NQTOw. 00 SAN. SEWER 10' EASEMENT S 88•41 Lib"! 524 29 1,500 US m it R :Is rl = s PW 1--i • rJ4, ti r• S n.a' e.7i �;•�� t�.r y 5 r FI iY iv = iY T 3 {c•vw R.20• t . ea.fo. e,2a• PO �. 'r\ e•7S j. 4 � n•za' 5a r J. �4r•. {e.u.eo a.sa•se:i L. as To y F. M10 W SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE Vl lltt tw10 rA► coww2CMI wc►wcaeNn A auwveT rAw •T re a A. rT w—C— 1. eoNrowr.wce •ITTN TNe weouu er cwTa a rNa auwveT wccowou,q Acr. Ar TNc ■aouteT or, NOVDE - BE SEL1N TN�r a al iw•f•164 ,.� COPYI ORIGIIUIL ON FILE IN TW( COUNII' AUDITOR'S OFF><eE n b A �o { e . ar.so V1 ••.r. L ..e.00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION el That portion of Government Lot ], Section 21, Township 27 Routh, Rang ) East.o r Y.R., deurlbed as follows: Constantin y at the Intersection of the south line t_ of Section 23. and the easterly right -of -may line of the Burlington northern Ball rwd; menu along said eauerly right-of-way N12`31'31'E, 616.37 feet to the trve point of beginning; [Bence contlnufnq N12•)1']1'E, 7]1.18 feet W the southerly rtght-oGwy of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way Iine S56.17.06'E, 12.54 feet; thence S88.12'06'E, 521.Z9 feet; thence way I, .@ E. 110.49 feet to the westerly rtyht.of_wy of SR-104 (as candemed under S.C.C. No. 106]75); thence SI'08'51'Y along said westerly rlgh Lof_wr e distance of 562.54 feet; thence 1188.12'06'11, 422.56 feet; thence RI3•/2'06'Y, 12D.00 feet; thence S/6•i7'S/'Y. 70.00 feet; thence N37.00'00'Y. 260.00 feet; thence S71•00. 00'W. 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning. It e.s2.w A . so'w'ao' L , ae.a• 100, dw �v aA�'e atyam tsar�d Uj 1 N BBYILK M �21.36 SAN:. SEWER==ESMT. SURVEY FOR HOVDE`--jBESELIM IN GOV'T. LOT 3, SEC. 23, TWP. 27 N., RNG. 3E- VI.H. LEGEND CITY OF EDMONDS. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Reid, Middleton G Associates, Inc. DENOTES 10 SAN. gunEngawm • Sixveyon • Plonxn y SEWER EASEMENT f 121 Sm A— N. U.. 200. (&—%. WA 96070 as'PTCORDIHO CERTIFICATE 8212035007 rneo row ee wo K t E RDY F r LM- in �.Tr,a..3�•r or 1a 4 r�.y r,rune r.rr oclnc Awo wccowoto ,r •-iwur.�L a SURVE75 �• p, racao�.�a waCi,wOa a SNOMOYISN COUrf1, vA.Nug10.,. � 41 P^i i i iii'i S BB'e2'LLS"F WATER,AIM 10' EASEMENT A. n, � n.n' n•e0 i i r �? is, iv r iv T n. v.so • n•srier • •.ao n•21 17I.79 'Q R � •a r� D TXXIII j JIM E a . 6 2.3o a • .1•aow L..e.00 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION That prtfow of Coeernnent Lot 3. SKLIon 23. To nhip 27 North. Range 3 East. a.is' dtscrf bed as follows: Consent" at the Intersection of the south line G' of Incttow 23, and the easterly right-of-wy Ilwe of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way Is42-34'14•E. 616.31 feet t0 the true Point of beginning; thence continuing B42'31.34'E, 731.16 feet to the southerly rl9ht-of-wy of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of wy line S$8'17'06'E. 11.54 feet; thence SBB•12'06'E. S24.Z9 feet; thence ,b S41'39'17•E, 110.e9 feet to the westerly right_of.wy of SR-104 (as condemed under S.C. [. No. 1063151: thence SI1D8'Se'Y along said restarts, right_oLwr a distance of $62.54 feel; thence 1188.12'06'11, e22.56 feet; thence W3•e2'06'Y t 120.00 feet; thence S46'17'5e'Y. 70.00 feet; thence R31•00'00'Y. 260.00 feet: Q .` thence S)1.00'00'Y. 601.09 feet to the true point of beginning. a•sa•la it ' L•6ur0 F MIOp< ,a x0 J =!I SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE ro'� i LEGEND ;u t163,dr s„n ru cowwcrnr wc►waa[rre • ♦uwvc� r.oa .• ra oli �' uroaw rr o,w.enon r eor10wr.wc■ wnr —a waou,wa ram w ,��" tr[auwver waeowou.a cs rrra waouuror NOVDE-BE cE IJN ��" DENOTES 10 WATER TM�c--9—�••a 42L96'V��' •1�. MAIN EASEMENT `L� . a13. COPY ORIGINAL ON FILE IN TTIE COUNTY AUDITOR'S OFFICE too' I� Iif �w. 16.:13 ash-sse aaaSew X LU too' V. rrww1 I WATER MAIN ESM'T. SURVEY FOR HOVDE — BESEL I N IN GO%eT. LOT 3. SEC. 23. TWP. 27 N.. RNG. 3E., W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS• SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Reid. Middleton G Associotes. Inc. Engineen SL"eyols • Piannen , 71 !n, A+ N )—a 200. id —h. VA o6070 I ' M, -prnr STORM WATER AND POTABLE WATER MAIN EASEPIENT vo,,Z / tot 11 AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT This Agreement made on this date between the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City," the Port of Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as "Port_," and r—( Beseli.n/Hovde Associates, a partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Beselin/Hovde." WHEREAS, the Port has leased to Beselin/Hovde certain real property located in the City of Edmonds, more particularly VID described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, for a :fifty (50) year term, and WHEREAS, Beselin/Hovde are engaged in developing the said property as a business park, and WHEREAS, in connection with said development Beselin/Hovde is required to provide water drainage and retention facilities in accordance with applicable Edmonds City Codes, and WHEREAS, the City is concerned with implementing a comprehensive drainage plan to alleviate the problems of storm water run-off in the area and to alleviate the flooding condition -- which occur on Dayton Street to the north of the subject property as well as private property surrounding Dayton Street to the t,vi: c;r of the subject property, and WHEREAS, Beselin/Hovde has offered to oversize the stoat water lines in their drainage facilities to accon..modate the increased flow of surface water from both public and private property located upstream from the subject property in exchancl for the City's purchase of easement and agreement_ to maintain storm sewer lines and potable water- main, and WHEREAS, the City will be able to save substant.iai. suns by purchasing easement and drainage facilities, and WHEREAS, the City desires to pur-chafo the storm water facilities now in place on the property to assure proper maintenance of the said .facilities; now, tlie:re.to-re, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PI:OMISES AND COVEN?,,NTS, the parties agree as follows,: 1. (a) Storm Drainage Easement. The Port and Beselin/Hovde hereby grant to the City a perpetual ten foot (10') easement in, over and on the easement property described on Exhibit "B," attached hereto and incorporated STREET FILE +�+!Inn kn:JY.+^�N YMktek':M M.F:IP • e herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The easement shall be for operation, maintenance and repair of the surface water drainage and retention facilities therein. 1. (b) Potable Water Main Easement. The Port and Beselin/llovde hereby grant to the City a perpetual ten foot (101) easement, in, over, and on the ea:_;e- ment property described in Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. This easement shall be for the operation, maintenance and repair of a potable water main now in place in t:he described easement. 2. City to Maintain and Repair. The City shall have the permanent obligation to maintain, repair and/or reconstruct, the storm water lines and the potable water main at its sole expense. 3. Right of Entry_ The City shall. have the right, without: prior i.nstitutio!! of suit or proceeding at law, at times that it may deem reasonably necessary, to enter upon the easements heretofoi.,D desc.r. i_b(d for the purpose of repairing, altering or reconstructing the storm water lines and the potable water main, without .incurring any legal obligation or liability therefor, provided that any improvements existing in the easements shall be .immediately replaced by City in as good a condition as they were immediately before entry by the City. 4. Covenant Runninq With Land. The easements herein granted and the: rights and obligationn, herein created shall be permanent and shall be a covenant running with the land and the rights and obligations of the parties herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, successors and assigns including without limitation all subsequent owners, lessees, tenants and subtenants and all other persons claiming under them. 5. Compensation. The City shall pay to the Port and Beselin/Hovde th( sum of Eighteen Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($13,600) in full consideration for the grant of the easements herein. 6. Abandonment. 1• C 0 N N Should all parties at any time abandon the use of either easement such easement shall. be terminated. 'Phis provis:i0l, shall not be interpreted to mean that either party may individually' terminate this agreement or its responsibilities in this agreement. 7. Enforcement. Should any of the parties L)e required to take legal action to enforce any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all its costs and expenses incurred therein, i-nc_ludi-ng this sums as and for reasonable attorney fees. DATED this 5r"day of MAPIC H , 1983. CITY OF ED14ONDS By -'� Harve H. Harrison, Mayor ATTEST: Irene Varney ?flora City Clerk v � O 7 2 -3- PORT OF EDMONDS r BY Gordon f7axwell, President o.f' the Port Commission A'1' l' E S'].' : Roger. Stubbs, Secretary o the Port Commission BESELIN/1-iOVDE ASSOCIATES, .A Partner_ 'ship i I Dick Beselin, a Partner By Kenneth A. Hovde, a Partner `i STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this � day of %(.,;'c.. 4 , 1993, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and .for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared HARVE H. IIARkISON and IRENE VARNEY MORAN, to me known to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Edmonds, tho corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day finq'year in this certificate above written. Notary Pubic in and for the, StaTC ,. , Z of Washington, Residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day of , ��. ,,i d`!/1983, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in znd'foi: the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared GORDON M.AXWELL and ROGER STUBBS, to me known to be the Pz:esident h and Secretary of the Port Commission, respectively, of t�-� Port. of Edmonds, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed'the day and year first above written. , — ' • rt -4- fy Public in and Yihl(rl5 ctit ashington, Residingr�',<<.,, pr,r.F STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss . COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this (�� day of �I� _ 1983, before men the undersigned, a Notary Pub-iic in anc:vfor the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared DICK BESELIN and KENNETH A. HOVDE, a partnership, that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and dead of the said individual partners, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the said partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. IftaT PubL5_c in and for. Zh�a`te 10 lof hington, Residing+fd`C.:: i� -5- ' -T 10 That portion of Government -Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right -of --way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way N42034134", 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N42°34'34"E, 73.1.18 feet to the southerly right-of-way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right-of-way line S58017'06"E, 12.54 feet; thence S88042'06"E, 524.29 feet; thence S41039117"E, 110.49 feet to the westerly right-o.C-way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. No. 1.06375); thence S1008'54"W along said westerly right--of-way a distance of 562.54 feet; thence N88°42'06"W, 422.56 feet; thence N43°42'06"W, 120.00 feet; thence S46°1-7'S4"W, 70.00 feet; thence N37°00'00"W, 260.00 feet; thence S71°00'00"la, 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning'. Situate in Snohomish County, Washington. J I% 0• y1 6♦a -+ scv7tr use_[ ar scrrKatt r3 R[pl)•1011e0 CR7iT1i7CJtTt 3 G 1 2'J3 5, .� U ♦a .o .. tt flay 11 rina r rote e.m' '= R N M E- JY T\ \\ L D 714V�0� 3 ,.4Q. e.w ,» . t %. e78 ♦ ..rota t ..aae YTGR%1 'Ytf(R W [Aft 09SIT '7 ILEML 0£$iJttPTi¢ti ' i ¢ see% Plea® at amroaet ts% s. 4tc0ea a. TameNy r7 Ittrm, ®sot 1 ifee. ■.Q, eaecrl bd as Aliesy: Ceaerclog at the letersectf" the Berta loco erof N Sottlee r3. Bed too a t®ly ►lr"f-my Jim of tie fllegf� A ttrtlt mdread% theca cosy "Id rtv y r1vrt-e1-.wty Rtt'St'Sti. 416.3y hOt to Or %see pot of 1— tface co tlestog 0%T'>t•SPt, M.19 feet to the testarly rt f-rq of thyte. Street: tires oe 01" yell otLerly riot of llee e,0! rey s 17'M'[. lT. s+ test: 0ac0 sftra•a-t. fn.» fast. toes. Se17g•17'[. t19.es fact is %Ue Bt•te!, rtet-0t-.7.r m-la (« e,.�eer each S.C.C. )tecs fltoSty emq elf Bested, ►toso• etstaece of %W.S4 IMt: tlace 10•42'051, %2.90 Mt: tr.ea M?4r§SIL ,=.Go Mt: theca Se1-17•S411. 79.02 hots ttleece av*1111*40 'f. FM.Y fast%- "==4 sn®•091; 400.0 feet IN as tree Into% of Sylslsp. i• te-..r ♦. Gen S Aftp4 A tsuetvlsroles can�� tt� ,.a ... sse— c y —.cure . —em, Ustmo 'I :.Qx" r a • sass COPY oaicyaµ ati ru �R C'vU" walows CP e-� 1 s I 1d STORM SEWER ESM'T. SURVEY FOR HOVDE - BESELIM M GOV T. LOT 3. 39C. LS TOR n K- RMIL 3 [ O.tl. CITY OF E01110 S. 3180" ISH COUNTY, WASIM NSTON q Reid. h%d0econ G Assockxgps Inc , - DENwa s d STol Gay . U--fC- I ware+ers d WrIf" CA""AT f --- 171 1w Awe It Lm wo 14—ft WA *Gaol 3 Z's �a 1 ` aol � +. SPI/TM LfNf f1i SfCTIAV )! �. RECORDING C"Mr1CATE 8212035007 • ' ao for •r •ro e•1EBS77 F F1IC0t[TOM - TMn��.• oe �L/� �e L.a7 .w.nca III C� 1' �J j= WATER Main ' — i0' EASEadEKT s0 7Z R iV id r iV T \ L D T w • n•v"e -- \ \s a•16' �3 CP LEGAL DESCRIPTION ei That pertlee of toeerwarnt Let ), fectlw i). To•wshfy 21 brG, Range ] East. n•xs M.It., describ" as follo•S: Cosyncfay at the intonectlo•s of in@ south Zino i sf Section I3. end the easterly right -of -ray Ita of the Eurllwgt" tort►om 4 flroad; thence along said easterly rtgbt-of.ray M2.3413e•E, 616.31 feet to \ the tree point of beglmfy; tharco COAtlnrtng e42'34•316E, 731.1E foot to the southerly ri911t-of-, y of Dayton Street; thence along Said southerly right o htf i "T line SSE•IPOVE. 12.54 foot. thence S88•e2'06•E. S24.29 feet; thence + Stl'39'II•E, 110.09 feet to the Westerly rfg_of.ry or 51-106 la1 condemM t]" ender f.C.t. M9. 10637SI tae nC• SI.08'Sa'V along said Westerly rtght:.,- a dlStA ce of W.$d feet: thenco 1f8E•42'06•Y, 422.S6 feet; thence o43•47'06'V,� 120.00 fool: theneo S46.17'Se'Y. 70.00 foot; thenc9 0131.00.0011, 26Q.00 feet; abt i theK• S71'00'00'11. 601.09 feet to the true point of beginning. [a•u.sQ -Ill a • sa•Sa:i L•aQ?Q F '`'l00 x �"'• Q J 2 Jt SURVEYOR] CERTfI1CATIE 10% LEGEND p `4 ;1 n.n ru eowwecrir waruet•era . •uwvei r.oa a• rii,:i'' u«Sxw .♦ awacr.ow r co«ro.r. «ca � r«a•vwra•eacowmwo.c•...,,a ° _ '-'7 nwtquae.«c.„tl4Y.CE'w9L:EL:Y_ ��'=r�ti is �_J Jf NCrES id 'WATER COPY OR";'„L ON FRE IN THE COUhl'Y jkUOfSOaS OFFICE lb h a M 1(>0" aura•:rws�. 4� es ' — aq!id P� 100' i WATER MAIN ESM'T. SURVEY FOR HOVDE — BESEL t td IN GOV'T. LOT 3. SEC. 23. TWP. 27 N.. RNG. 3 E., M.Y. CITY OF EDMONDS. SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON Reid. Middleton G Associates, Inc. I .., i.r u m t v .•u vs a r. �l 4 � � a lot of walk-on people who would like to play on the weekend. COUNCILMEMBER NORD- MOTION: QUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN, TO REAFFIRM THE MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY SCHEDULE AND THAT SUNDAY SCHEDULING BE BASICALLY FOR TOURNAMENT PLAY BUT WITH NO SCHEDULING AFTER 4:00 P.M. (HOURS TO BE 9:30 TO 4:00 P.M.) Donna Miller said the tournament play is the worst because they are yelling. She thought there should be no scheduled play and no tournaments on Sundays. Tom Davis said his team plays 12-15 tournaments, traveling some of the time, and they are through on Sundays by 2:00 or 3:00 p.m. He observed that to many people the sound of people cheering and having fun is not a bad sound, and also that people who are playing ball are for the most part citizens of the community. Don Stay asked why not create a sports arena and have the Council and the administration find some capital and land and the players will find ways to help finance it. He thought they should find a long-term remedy. Councilmember Allen responded that the Meadowdale playfield is just that remedy but Edmonds will have to put up money to make that field work and it is in another city. She felt the situation would be remedied if that were developed. Roy LaRue, President of the Edmonds Softball Association, said they would greatly indorse the Meadowdale complex, and he noted that his group has a history of spending money on the fields and working on them. He said the Edmonds field is the best field around and that is why they want to play on it. AT THIS TIME THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR CARRIED. Councilmember Gould asked if the City could accept the challenge of the lighting shields more aggressively --could it find another kind of vehicle with an extending boom and with big tires and with planking get the shields in place. Mr. Simpson said the Public Works people have been checking the local rental agencies for equipment. Councilmember Jaech suggested a kind of scaffolding equipment that is not heavy. The people in the audience were then asked to contact the Mayor if they were interested in working on a committee regarding the Meadowdale field. Mr. Simpson said it would help if the Council would like to indorse it as an idea as there is a group waiting for some indorsement. He said he could bring the master plan back to the Council again for review. Councilmember Jaech suggested that a task force work on it, but Councilmember Allen thought the report from Mr. Simpson would give the Council a better idea of where to go, and she suggested it be pushed through the Shared Services Committee. She said Lynnwood does not want to do the whole job and there has not DaAIw4. been much help from the other cities. April 12, 1983 was set for the report from Mr. r �JSimpson. % DISCUS±SIION OF--DA�YaT.ONlok-ST+MARBORi�wSQUA`REV�D:RA'IMRGE EASEMENT. City Engineer Jim Adams referred to a letter from Dick Beselin to the Port of Edmonds stating that Beselin/Hovde Associates has no further desire to provide an easement to the City for utilities if the City does not wish to be responsible for possible damage it may incur as a result of its access to the utilities. He had indicated that if the City did not respond to the proposal and render payment in full of the $18,600 by March 10, 1983 the issue would be considered closed. City Attorney Wayne Tanaka stated that Dick Cole, the Port Attorney, and he had been discussing the form of the easement for some time and the issue arose as to whether the City would main- tain and repair the lines, the Port's position being that the City should agree to maintain and repair the lines and they do not feel there needs to be any further consideration by the Port or Beselin. Mr. Tanaka had suggested a release from them which would be an agreement that because the City will maintain the lines the Port and Beselin/Hovde Associates would not sue the City if the City somehow negligently caused some damage, but they were not agreeable to that. Mr. Tanaka said this was a policy decision, whether the Council is willing to accept the increased responsibility for increased risk or wants some increased consideration from the Port. He said Mr. Beselin thought the City was agreeing to pay the $18,600 and also maintain the lines, and the City may want to maintain the lines, but it is just a question of risk and payment. Mr. Adams said the City gets easements for the water mains to wherever the meter and fire hydrant are, and with sanitary sewers the City normally does not accept them unless they are going through the property to serve other properties, and the City's responsibility stops at the property line, but with this storm sewer the discussion was that the City would accept this line and maintain it because the majority of the water going through would be from the street. He said this was storm EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — Page 4 - March 8, 1983 sewer only and sanitary sewers were not in question here. Mr. Tanaka said there is no right or wrong, that it is a policy decision entirely, and the Port or Beselin/Hovde Associates would have to take care of the lines themselves if the City had not done so, and by the fact that the City is taking care of them the City is doing part of the work they would have had to do. He said the Council should just be aware of the risk and be willing to accept it. Regarding the question of liability if the line plugs up and floods the place, Mr. Tanaka said it is negligence in maintenance, not cleaning it out quickly enough, and since the City would be responsible it would be liable. A comment was made that the City is liable on all the other lines in the MOTION: City. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT WITH BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES IN REGARD TO THE STORM DRAINAGE LINES AND THAT THE CITY PROCEED WITH THE ISSUANCE OF $18,600 SO IT CAN GET STARTED WITH THE DRAINAGE PROJECTS, AND THAT BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES BE NOTIFIED THE NEXT DAY OF THIS ACTION, MOTION CARRIED. A recess was announced. PRESENTATION OF STAFF WORKUP OF WATER/SEWER RATE STRUCTURE PRINCIPLES AS APPROVED BY COUNCIL Accounting Supervisor Jeffrey Ristau submitted the proposed water and sewer rates which he said were prepared in accordance with the rate principles approved by the City Council. He stated that the proposed water rates reflect the establishment of a domestic class which includes both single residence and multiple dwelling units. With the exception of the credit provided for billing cost, all living dwellings are charged on the same basis. No rate change for the other customer classes was considered. The sewer rates also reflect the establishment of a domestic class which includes both single residence and multiple dwelling units. The annual debt service cost of $117,500 associated with the $1,000,000 bond issue was added as an additional revenue requirement of the sewer operation. No rate change was considered for unconnected customers. The average combined water and sewer bill for a single residence would decrease by 6%, and the average combined water and sewer bill for the multiple dwelling customer would increase by 46%. It was recommended that these rates be effective April 1, 1983 and they would be reviewed during the annual budget process to determine if any change is necessary to assure that the water/sewer operation is self-sufficient. Councilmember Naughten stated that this proposal did not adopt three of the principles: relief for low income, conservation, and phase -in. He said users of 1,000 cu. ft. and below received the greatest increase in January 1982 and that is 24% of the users, and he thought most of those people are on fixed low income and he would like to see relief for them. Councilmember Gould said he was almost totally dissatisfied with what was proposed because it did not meet the principles they outlined, such as timing, relief, con- servation, what happens to the bond rating, what happens to timing on construction projects, bond payments, effluent cost payments, and independence. He said he was very upset that it did not meet the principles the Council had adopted. Finance Director Art Housler responded that Mr. Ristau had submitted 'a list of 12 questions to them last week and said in order to provide a structure based on the principles they needed answers to those questions, but the Council had said to go ahead and prepare it answering the questions himself. Further, he said $20,000 was spent for a rate study because the City does not have the in-house staff to prepare rate structures. Then the Finance Department got involved simply because they provide the revenues to the utility. He said until the Price Waterhouse Report this was done by the Engineering Department who understand the consumption and cost of footage per pipe, and then the Finance Department inherited it. He said he does not know the structures, and Mr. Ristau had asked that in question 2 of his handout. He asked how do you put conservation into a structure. Councilmember Gould said the proposal says they will institute the rates in April 1983 and that is not what the Council asked for. He referred to the minutes of February 22, 1983 wherein Principle 6 was adopted, saying that rate changes should be phased in gradually with equity reached by January 1, 1985. He thought the Staff had the expertise to do it and that this should go back to the Staff. Mr. Ristau said the intent was that equity would be achieved by the service in that the rates to domestic will be on the same basis. Regarding conservation, he said he needed direction in regard to whether the Council wanted a single variable rate or a set variable rate which is a standard used by American Waterworks. For the rates proposed they had the variable rate continue at the 86t level that was developed by Price Waterhouse who had conservation as a principle of their study. Mayor Harrison said he had not realized the Council had taken action on a phase -in so he accepted EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 - March 8, 1983 L-A 16-�-_ FILE NO. - March 3, 1983 MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison Mayor FROM: James E. Adams City Engineer SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF DAYTON STREET/ HARBOR SQUARE DRAINAGE EASEMENT Attached is a copy of a letter from Dick Beslin to the Port of Edmonds regarding the proposed drainage ease- ment from Dayton Street across Harbor Square. The City Attorney will present additional information regarding the current status of the agreement with the Port. JEA/st Attachment „ . 3/3 Irene V. Moran Dt STREET FILE I �bruary 23, 1983 Dick Cole Attorney at Law Port of Edmonds 120 2nd Ave. South Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Dick: I have talked with Ken Hovde and we both agree that we have no further desire in providing an easement to the City of Edmonds for utilities if they do not wish to be responsible for possible damage they may incur, as a result of their access to the utilities. Should this be their decision, we wish to terminate the present offer of $18,600 by Harbor Square as presented in the Port's revised proposal. Harbor Square and the Port have extended this arrangement in good faith and at a considerable savings to the City. As they do not wish to cooperate or recognize our position, our only alternative is to negotiate at a later time and at a cost to the City which would be commensorate to the market.'or actual cost to provide such a system. Should the City not respond to your revised proposal, and if we don't receive payment in full under this proposal by March 10, 1903, please consider this a dead issue. SIncerely, Besel BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOCIATES DB: sb cc: Wayne Tanaka Jim Adams 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 !It CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 CITY ATTORNEY March 3, 1983 Jim Adams City Engineer Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 • L / z. RECEIVED 4199TVE H. HARRISO� M pR MAYOR OGMEEPOG Re: Dayton Street Drainage Easement Dear Jim: Enclosed please find a copy of a drainage easement for storm water and potable water over the Beselin/Hovde property which has been signed by both the Port and Beselin/Hovde Associates. I would appreciate your verifying the legal descriptions contained on the exhibits to make sure they are accurate. Dick Cole, the Port's attorney, and I have been dis- cussing the terms of this easement. There are several unresolved questions which need to be addressed by the Council. The first is whether the City wishes to assume the obligation to maintain, repair and replace the pipes within the easement. It is my understanding that the City wishes to do this. If this is so, then the City Council will need to consider two further factors. First, it must be remembered that agreement to assume maintenance and operation of the storm water and potable water main lines will result in increased exposure to liability by the City. Secondly, in light of this increased liability I -had proposed to the Port that both the Port and Beselin/Hovde Associates agree not to sue the City as a result of the City's maintaining and operating the storm water and potable water lines. The reasoning for this is that since either the Port or Beselin/Hovde would have had to have maintained the lines themselves, they would be deriving a benefit from the City's acts. Since they could not sue themselves in the event of negligence on their own part, I felt that they should agree not to sue the City for undertaking this STREET FILE i Jim Adams March 2, 1983 Page 2 obligation. Mr. Beselin has indicated that this is not acceptable to him and if this clause were insisted on by the City he would not agree to the easement. The enclosed storm water and water main easement requires the City to maintain and operate the lines and does not provide for a release as outlined above. If the City Council wishes to assume the additional responsibilities and not require the Port or Beselin/Hovde Associates to release the City from any claim of negligence then the enclosed agreement is acceptable as to form. Otherwise changes will have to be made. You should request the City Council to instruct the staff in accordance with the policy determina- tions as outlined above. Mr. Beslin has indicated that unless a decision is reached by March 10, he would not grant the City any easement. We would then have to either condemn one or put the water somewhere else. WDT:jt Enclosure Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Wayne Tanaka Snohomish County Public Transppoortatio. I nefit Area Corporf Comma uulNik a i:ail February 1, 1983 Mr. Dick Beselin 300 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Dick, �i 4208198th Street S.W.. Suite 201 Lynnwood, Washington 880 • Phone: Lynnwood:206.778.1.1159159 Everett: 206-259-4223 � b . _ R�CEIVED F F B '7 1983 ENGINEERING I have reviewed the new Dayton Street Plan from Reid and Associates. I an in favor of proceeding with the New Plan. Under the New Plan, the entire ten -foot (101) bus turn -out and the five -and -one -half -foot (5 1/2') sidewalk is on City right-of-way; thus resolving the objections maintained by the Port Commission. If, and when, bus commuter parking presents a problem to Harbor Square Development, Community Transit pledges to do everything within its power to provide additional parking within a reasonable walking disatance of the bus turn -out. Thank you for the cooperation and assistance you have given my staff in developing the Dayton Stret Bus Turn -Out Facility. Sinc ) ic Dirt cc: W. Bill Auerswald, Port Manager, Jim Adams, City/Engineer, City of Edmonds Roy Sorensen, Transportation Supervisor, CT Terry Talbot, Chief of Route/Schedule Planning, CT Mary Lou Block, Director of Planning, City of Edmonds STREET FILE li:. January 26, 1983 MEMO TO: Hearing Examiner FROM: Dan Smith Planning/Engineering �rlk�er Inspector SUBJECT: FEBRUARY 3, 1983 HEARING F ST-7-82 G & M INVESTMENT Amendment to the Official Street Map to remove a proposed street in the vicinity of 78th Avenue West and 234th Street S.W. and to add a new 30' street connecting 232nd Street S.W. and 234th Street S.W. (.RS-8/CG) Engineering does not object to this action as long as it does not preclude any of the adjacent properties from access to utlities or the public road. CU-3-83 HOVDE/BESELIN Conditional Use Permit for fill and grading of approximately 12,000 cubic yards at 180 Dayton Street (Dayton Street between SR 104 and Railroad Avenue) (CG) Engineering does not object to this request. The requirements are: a) An approved route; b) No tandem trucks allowed; and c) The contractor is responsible for keeping the public streets clean and free of mud and debris. V-1-83 No continent. DS/mt HUMMEL HOMES Variance to improve non -conforming structure more than 25% of the valuation at 729 Main Street. (RS-6) 4 CITY OF EDMONDS EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ofFile No 4/- 3 Date FeeQL APPLICATION TO HEARING EXAMINER FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APO' S_ _ Rect. No. HEARING DATE o2 APPLICANT: HOyde/Beselin ADDREss 300 Admiral Way PHONE 774-8993 Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Lease Holder OWNER: Port of Edmonds ADDREss456 Admiral Way PHONE 774-0549 LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) Dayton. Street between SR 104 & Railroad Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23. To be completed by the Planning Division: Use Zone C Qs — Legal description checked and approved by: ate: VICINITY SKETCH: PLEASE SHOW BELOW A VICINITY SKETCH AS PER EXAMPLE, INDICATING NORTH. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: Fill and grade site with 12,000 c.y.± imported soil. DETAILS OF PROPOSED USAGE: Thp prnpr)qpd fill JS to hP 11SPd in rnnnprtin with Signature of Applicant er or Representative RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Reid., Middleton & s-sociates, Inc. The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration,for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages.and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of'insnection and posting attendant to this application. Signature of App cant, a or Representative Reid, Middleton & A SO.cta•tes, Inc. 0 40 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Hovde-Beselin 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 300 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington 98020 Phone - 774-8876 3. Date Checklist Submitte : January 14 1983 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Edmonds 5. Name of Proposal, if applicab e: Port of Edmonds Business Park 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Conditional Use Permit for -on -site fill. See Attached Harbor Square E I S _dated January 1980 on file in the Edmonds Planning office. 7. Location of Proposal (describe t e p ys cal setting of the pro- posal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): Southwest corner of SR-104 and Dayton Avenue intersection. The site is north of the Union Oil Marshland E%Limneed Date for Completion of the Prc>px,sjl: Spring 1983 00 `). Litit of .,II IYi-litiIs, Licert5c's ()r Govcrrtuuc:nt Appr()vaIs Rt-quii lur I11C P 1.01)l Vwd I (Ic-deral, slate and Ioc:aI -- iui.llid iny_ re. -(me:,) Fill R Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, nr further activity reIaI.ed Co or connected with this proposal? If ye_s, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the propel ty covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No i:. AtIac:h any othrr application form that has hoen compleI(.•(I regord- iir't Ihc! pr11po-„rl; 11 1)o110 has bt-ull ccanp14.14-d, hill i , ux.p(.(lIcd toy ht.! I'iIt'd rrt scnnc! future dale, describe the nature, of such application I orm: I I. f-NU I RONMLN IAA. I MPAC 1-S (I_xlIIanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No (I) [arch. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unsfill) le earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x (h) Di -.rup I. ions, displacement~, compaction or rcve I—LO VC V i nrl o f t he "oi I? x (c) Change in (opograp hy or grr,utid surface relief features? x (d) The destruction, covering or modification f any unique geologic or physical features? x (e) Any iticrt�a,,e in wind or w,iI.er ero:;iut1 01 soi 15, ei tlie r on or off 1.17e 5i te? x Earth The project will intail the importing of fill material to raise all building and parking facilities as indicated on the enclosed plan. Proposed finish floor elevations are set at 14.0 with existing elevation of the building sites ranging from 12.5 to 13.0 + . Due to the location of the proposed site and topography being nearly flat minimal or no erosion or sedimentation will result from the filling operation except for the need to sweep the access road during import to prevent soil from impacting city storm sewer facilities. Yes Maybe No ( I) LIiauryc's i n depos it i on or e: r'rr, hill ()l beach ti,lnds, ccr ch,urcJc in 5i Itat icon, dc'po t ion car u rus i on wh i c I i miry' mod i l'y the change I o I a r- i ve r or stream or the bed or the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x Explanation: See attached (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of amblent air quality: X (h) The creation of objectionable odors: x (c.) A11.vvat imi uI a r rnc,voment , Ilk) isture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: SpP , t t rherl (3) WaL er. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes i n current is , or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? x (b) Chtrncles i n absorp t. i on rat es , d ra i n,rclt! pal h,rns , or I he rate and amoun t of sur (:.Ice water runof f'? X (c) Alterations to the course of flovi of flood waters? x (cl) in th(,- amounl of surlaco lgater. in :Illy water lu)dy? x (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x Yes Maybe No (I) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow cif ground waters? x (y) Clr,rnge in the quantity of ground waters, Tither through direct additions or withdrawals, or lhr-orrrlll interception of an aquiler by cuts or exc.avat i ons? x (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, wal.orburna virus or bacteria, or other sub- SI-111cOs ill(L) the ground walers? x (i) Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? _ X Explanation: See attached (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including Irres, shrubs, grass, crops, Ili croflora and .rq u;i t i c 1, Ian t s)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural c rop7 x Explanation: See at a_hed (5) Fauna., Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or Yes Maybe No numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, hen thic organisms, insects or micro - fauna)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? _X (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wi ldl i fe habitat? X Explanation: S. -attached (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: See attached (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x Explanation: See attached (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x Explanation: See attached Yes Maybe No (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area: x Explanation: (12) Housing, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular mo ve me n t ? x (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x (f). Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: See Attached (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? X (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: See Attached c; Yes Maybe No (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X__ (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? x Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result In a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x (b) Communications systems? X_ (c) Water? x (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Storm water drainage? X_ (f) Solid waste and disposal? x Explanation: See Attached (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x Explanation: See Attached (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x Explanation: See Attached (20) Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X Explanation: III. SIGNATURE '1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: j Section A -A .rr Ca Manhole Detail No. 1 it pay-._.a.•..•t......,.: ' �� 1� 1rw.,.V �•t.i.U•a. • Mt �l I 1 I I \ 1 I r �t j c a trwwta Dot" po. ! Saco" A -A 1, n�i m�twety Wtl tr'a.. .. Ye 'i✓[.,�r� iwrinttitN. Iln �{ttrt II.IK .Mt. Crtawtlr• r w.rr. Mar r ..r_r V n. CIV of fr..w. Y.V [..-- w[Mlw.r a C.V t>.rl.r - I.N «y_t. L nt m.wtl.. 1. YHtt _ r %-OIx _ 1. tV C.d .f Cfar.. r tr O.bKtr WII _ fr [_ C1V r Ww . f.r{. b tr'mS t110 1 LaV...rr a1..1../.11Ytlr y.er WI. r H- m nRlw r Wll r _I.[.Ir r.1. saw al.ar•. Mattwl. a. 11.. f�v..ns W71 .wlrl tr CIV tar,*0 r tr. b I..It bya<tla. s_ 1r.11 mtwlr .! 1lr flb 010— r r..pa... .t111tIw. at. trb.tt« —0..t CrwltIn t..lrr .r11 r.nt_ r wa11t Wr w II. C14p r 4rrs .k. 1"I— er lautlw r .11 .1r 01. 0 r ar .raea {. Tlla (atr.Ctr arll �}... b tr tbW.•. a.rw.t1_ .r[If4�tM s .A . ji-1 LV..r { Iw1_Iw. J. 4M1� +r�T...•r Iwlittlr a.r .t• .r.l r Wt . I['.V 1`r IT• w•rr 'aM .i.1.[bt W _.t.tttM 1. i.ot11 1.1{ c111[I.. O t_ ra.... ti O.tt11 .cs.t f.Nr t.p(Ia_ r <a.pllV MO arr._1.r .^(lw trt O U.w .r/...r.. .c[II[lw rl\r tr .nJ.ct iwlb. 14 - a amr— wrllll r Atr f— a— I.rt T.1 (1 Cla..alr N.19 1M t t r S_Itrt Sw. Lln ]t.tlr s.ro SIw r tia SLr_t. rsz T..ea. 1.1 R 0a.N/r It.{1 I1.. •4`.r T w .t.l la. tSP t st . r T.4-6 - twit. L.lf SIw r ..r St.ae_ 11..5 t1..RIr _ L.' 1S.Sr 000 r f_v Lr. Sr_ r r.r Sr (R J. j ar {pt b L 1r .A1. its CIV .f rr..t wu. w• arr -rr.r� . a'..w twrr � r r rrr. r c.1 r s wr r APPROVAL,n`�r.t�. r^.rr�.nr -' (w c a,:z J...0 .a Z O uU Ln U x O 1 o-�=�r-a v r-� SZ -3-yZ CITY OF )✓DMONDS rrmit No. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEC..161982 Issue Date I ZAS —M, RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Dir. Of Public Works A. *Address or vicinity of Construction • Owner: General Telephone of the N.W. ,In Name 3831 204th St. S. W. Mailing Address Lynnwood, WA 98036 City, State, Zip Code • Contractor: General Telephone of the N. Name Same Mailing Address • Permit Issued To: C0 (� • Type of Work to be Done: Place conduit for new cable to shopping center. • Work in Connection With: ( See Attached pri nts . ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family a Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes ❑ No W., Inc, C607 2100-3874582 State License Number City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. -I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for ins ion purposes at all times. Signature:4effDate Owner or Agent * THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Time Authorized: Void after (_4�) —days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: �- 30,00 Security Deposit: Receipt No.: <<i,h Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X = * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 CITY ATTORNEY a�'� 5 1 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR FiC - RECEIVED November 4, 1982 NOV 81982 Dir. Of Public Works Mr. Dick Cole 120 Second Avenue Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Beslin/Hovde Storm Water Easement Dear Dick: Enclosed please find a draft of a grant of easement from the Port and Beslin/Hovde to the City of Edmonds. Please let me know your comments on this matter. I would appreciate your forwarding a copy to Mr. Beslin for his approval. After an agreement has been reached the matter can be referred to the Edmonds City Council for their authorization. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Wayne •D. Tanaka WDT/nf encl. cc: Harve Harrison, Mayor Jim Adams, City Engineer STREET pILE STORM WATER EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this date between the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereafter referred to as "City" and the Port of Edmonds, hereafter referred to as "Port", and Beslin/Hovde Associates, hereafter referred to as "Beslin/Hovde". WHEREAS, the Port has leased to Beslin/Hovde certain real property located in the City of Edmonds, more particularly described hereafter for a fifty year term, and WHEREAS, the Port and Beslin/Hovde are engaged in developing said property for an industrial park, and, WHEREAS, in connection with said development Beslin/ Hovde is required to provide water drainage and retention facilities in accordance with applicable Edmonds City Codes, and, WHEREAS, the City is concerned with implementing a comprehensive drainage plan to alleviate the problems of storm water run-off in the area and to alleviate -the flooding conditions which occur on Dayton Street to the north of the subject property as well as private property surrounding Dayton Street, and, -1- 4k 0 WHEREAS, Beslin/Hovde has offered to oversize the storm water lines in their drainage facilities to accommodate the increased flow of surface water from both public and private property located upstream from the subject property in exchange for the City's purchase of easement, and, WHEREAS, the City will be able to save substantial sums by purchasing the easement and drainage facilities, and, WHEREAS, the City desires to purchase the right to use the existing storm water facilites to as proper maintenance of said facilities; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL BENEFITS, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Port and Beslin/Hovde hereby grant to the City of Edmonds a perpetual easement in, over and on the property described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incor- porated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The easement shall be for operation and maintenance of surface water drainage and retention facilities. 2. The City shall have the right without- prig institution of suit or proceedings at -law, at times that it may deem necessary, to enter upon the easement for the purpose of constructing, repairing, altering and/or recon- structing the storm water lines, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligation or liability therefore; provided that any improvements existing in the easement shall be replaced in as'good a condition as they -2- were immediately before entry by the City. 3. The Port and Beslin/Hovde covenant.and agree on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns to forever release the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and successors from any and all liability for property damages and/or personal injury which might be occasioned by the maintenance, operation or construction of the storm water facilities within said easement. 4. The easement herein granted and the rights herein created shall be a covenant running with the land and the rights and obligations of the parties herein shall inur to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, successors and assigns including without limitation all sub- sequent owners, lessees, tenants and subtenants and all other persons claiming under them. 5. The City shall pay to the port and Beslin/Hovde the sum of $18,500 in full consideration for the grant of the easement herein. 6. Should any of the parties be required to take legal action to enforce any of the terms of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of all -3- r its costs and expense incurred therein, including sums as and for reasonable attorney's fees. DATED this Port of Edmonds Beslin/Hovde Associates City of Edmonds STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) day of October, 1982. Port of Edmonds Beslin/Hovde Associates City of Edmonds On this day of , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and , to me known to be the and respectively of the Port of Edmonds, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instru- ment, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at -4- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day of , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- ington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and , to me known to be the and , respectively of Beslin/Hovde Associates, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and .official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day of , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me known to be the and , respectively of City of Edmonds, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at -5- so �6 0 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 27, 1982 Mr. Dick Beselin/Mr. Ken Hovde Harbor Square Associates 300 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR PUNCHLIST ITEMS TO BE CORRECTED AT HARBOR SQUARE DEVELOPMENT Below is the list of items that must be corrected prior to approval of the utility systems at the Harbor Square development. STORM SYSTEM 1. Grout and finish. Catch Basin #10;D K, 2. )'Plug weep hole in Catch Basin #12;0 k 3." Grout and finish.Catch Basin Manhole #1;01/, 4. Grout and fi-nish,: Catch Basin #15; 11/� 5. Correct asphalt failure at Catch Basin #19A; 6. Grout and finish Catch Basin #24;oif 7, Grout and finish Catch Basin #2;o K 8. Clean rubble from Catch Basin #l.o k SANITARY AND WATER SYSTEMS:. 1Clean and seal Manhole #1; Clean, grout and seal Manhole #2; C-P Correct infiltration problem and seal Manhole #3;0� Seal Manhole #4; Seal Manhole #5; Raise water valve at east entrance. It appears that enough rubble, asphalt, etc. has worked its way into the system that they warrant a total flushing. When these items are completed, please contact this office to schedule a inspection. Thank you. DAN SMITH Planning/Engineering Inspector DS/mt t/ 2 �L^ • MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FILE NO. October 25, 1982 Mary Lou Block Planning Director James E. Adams City Engineer HARBOR SQUARE DEVELOPMENT The Harbor Square E.I.S. Transportation Section included mitigating measures -- Traffic 1B., Page 46, requires a change to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Dayton Street and SR 104. Please have the developer submit a design plan for approval prior to beginning this work. WJN/st 4MarDt �loda Bill Nims Dt FILE NO. 05.2.02 October 25, 1982 Lf177P,Z' MEMO TO: Mary Lou Block Planning Director FROM: James E. Adams ®� City Engineer SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE DEVELOPMENT The Harbor Square E.I.S. Transportation Section included mitigating measures -- Traffic 1B., Page 46, requires a change to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Dayton Street and SR 104. Please have the developer submit a design plan for approval prior to beginning this work. WJN/st • • HALL, TO APPROVE ITEM (F) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, AUTHORIZING A BID OF $1,501 FOR THE USED SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTORCYCLE, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FUNDS WILL COME OUT OF THE EXISTING 1982 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR A NEW MOBILE RADIO. MOTION CARRIED. MAYOR Mayor Harrison introduced Tambi Shaw, the new Student Representative to the City Council. She is a sophomore at Edmonds High School and will serve as Student Rep- resentative until January 25, 1983. Mayor Harrison recognized a group of Webelos from Edmonds and Lynnwood who were in the audience. S Mayor Harrison requested a report from the Public Works Committee regarding the Harbor Square drainage situation. Councilmember Gould reported that their recom- mendation was: $15,000 already had been authorized to be spent by the City, and they. thought they should recommend that the City spend up to $18,600 for the purchase of the right to use the water pipe system or an easement to use the water pipe system; and secondly, they recommend authorizing the Staff to enter into negotiation for a maintenance agreement on that pipeline. They think it would be to their benefit to be in a position to maintain it. Dick Beselin was in the audience and said the MOTION: proposal was acceptable. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, THAT THE CITY BE AUTHORIZED TO SPEND UP TO $18,600 for the City's share of the drainage system and for that they will receive the right to place their water in those pipes or receive an easement from the property for that and, secondly, that the City enter into negotiations regarding maintenance of the drainage system. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Paula Johnson and Dave Ehrling of the Edmonds Business Association thanked the City for its participation in the recent "Krazy Daze and Fog Festival" and asked for participation in their next project, developing a Christmas House for Edmonds. Ms. Johnson said the Chamber of Commerce building will be decorated and will have figures representing Santa Claus and his wife in residence, and there will be a place for children to mail letters to Santa. There also will be a place to donate food and toys. They want to have this in place by December 1 and will add to it each year. Some trees have been donated and they are soliciting funds to finance it. They were asking the Council for permission to use the property and for a contribution of funds. Ms. Johnson said they need approximately $800 but will accept whatever is MOTION: given. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO PLACE ON THE AGENDA OF OCTOBER 26, 1982 THE REQUEST FOR FUNDS. Councilmember Gould commented that the Council heartily embraces the project. THE MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Harrison advised that two items on this evening's agenda would be postponed MOTION: because the posting requirements had not been met. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED TO PLACE ST-3-82 (GOLDSMITH RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION) ON THE NOVEMBER 16, 1982 AGENDA AND d 9" ST-5-82 (HUBBARD RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION) ON THE DECEMBER 7, 1982 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH 3-HOUR PARKING FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. ON BELL AND EDMONDS STS. FROM SUNSET AVE. TO 3RD AVE. AND ON 2ND AND 3RD AVES. FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CASPERS ST. City Engineer Jim Adams reported that he had received a number of calls in the past week with recommendations as to what should be done in regard to the proposed parking restrictions. He identified on a vicinity map the Central Business District (CBD), noting that part of the proposed restriction was to extend limited parking from the CBD to Caspers St., and a large number of residents objected to that. He also showed slides of affected streets which are not currently restricted to parking and which are congested with parked cars. Councilmember Naughten had not been present at the previous hearing and he asked why the proposal had 3-hour parking from Edmonds St. north to Caspers. Mr. Adams responded that it had been the Council recommendation. Mayor Harrison further explained that in the process of hearing the complaints of the residents at 2nd and Bell the City Council had decided to extend the parking restric- tion all the way to Caspers St. as an exploratory move. Councilmember Gould said they had been concerned about just moving the problem to the next set of neighbors and they were trying to avoid that. Mr. Adams further explained that the restrictions EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - October 19, 1982 On 1 Sr/?e47r HALL, TO APPROVE ITEM (F) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, AUTHORIZING A BID OF $1,501 FOR USED SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTORCYCLE, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FUNDS COME OUT OF THE EXISTING 1982 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FOR A NEW MOBILE RADIO. MOTION CARRIED. MAYOR f/t WILL Mayor Harrison introduced Tambi Shaw, the new Student Representative to the City Council. She is a sophomore at Edmonds High School and will serve as Student Rep- resentative until January 25, 1983. Mayor Harrison recognized a group of Webelos from Edmonds and Lynnwood who were in the audience. Mayor Harrison requested a report from the Public Works Committee regarding the Harbor Square drainage situation. Councilmember Gould reported that their recom- mendation was: $15,000 already had been authorized to be spent by the City, and they thought they should recommend that the City spend up to $18,600 for the purchase of the right to use the water pipe system or an easement to use the water pipe system; and secondly, they recommend authorizing the Staff to enter into negotiation for a maintenance agreement on that pipeline. They think it would be to their benefit to be in a position to maintain it. Dick Beselin was in the audience and said the MOTION: proposal was acceptable. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, THAT THE CITY BE AUTHORIZED TO SPEND UP TO $18,600 for the City's share of the drainage system and for that they will receive the right to place their water in those pipes or receive an easement from the property for that and, secondly, that the City enter into negotiations regarding maintenance of the drainage system. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Paula Johnson and Dave Ehrling of the Edmonds Business Association thanked the City for its participation in the recent "Krazy Daze and Fog Festival" and asked for participation in their next project, developing a Christmas House for Edmonds. Ms. Johnson said the Chamber of Commerce building will be decorated and will have figures representing Santa Claus and his wife in residence, and there will be a place for children to mail letters to Santa. There also will be a place to donate food and toys. They want to have this in place by December 1 and will add to it each year. Some trees have been donated and they are soliciting funds to finance it. They were asking the Council for permission to use the property and for a contribution of funds. Ms. Johnson said they need approximately $800 but will accept whatever is MOTION: given. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO PLACE a, d�e%,,,a,ON THE AGENDA OF OCTOBER 26, 1982 THE REQUEST FOR FUNDS. Councilmember Gould commented that the Council heartily embraces the project. THE MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Harrison advised that two items on this evening's agenda would be postponed MOTION: because the posting requirements had not been met. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED TO PLACE ST-3-82 (GOLDSMITH RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION) ON THE NOVEMBER 16, 1982 AGENDA AND Ed" ST-5-82 (HUBBARD RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION) ON THE DECEMBER 7, 1982 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. HEARING ON PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH 3-HOUR PARKING FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. ON BELL AND EDMONDS STS. FROM SUNSET AVE. TO 3RD AVE. AND ON 2ND AND 3RD AVES. FROM THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CASPERS ST. City Engineer Jim Adams reported that he had received a number of calls in the past week with recommendations as to what should be done in regard to the proposed parking restrictions. He identified on a vicinity map the Central Business District (CBD), noting that part of the proposed restriction was to extend limited parking from the CBD to Caspers St., and a large number of residents objected to that. He also showed slides of affected streets which are not currently restricted to parking and which are congested with parked cars. Councilmember Naughten had not been present at the previous hearing and he asked why the proposal had 3-hour parking from Edmonds St. north to Caspers. Mr. Adams responded that it had been the Council recommendation. Mayor Harrison further explained that in the process of hearing the complaints of the residents at 2nd and Bell the City Council had decided to extend the parking restric- tion all the way to Caspers St. as an exploratory move. Councilmember Gould said they had been concerned about just moving the problem to the next set of neighbors and they were trying to avoid that. Mr. Adams further explained that the restrictions EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - October 19, 1982 MAYOR Mayor Harrison said he would like to appoint Gordon Rosier to the vacant Planning Board Alternate position. He is a Meadowdale resident, a teacher in the Mukilteo School District, and a former member of the Shorelines Management Committee. It was decided to interview him and Jurgen Sauerland at 6:45 p.m., November 1, 1982. (Mayor Harrison previously had stated his intent to appoint Jurgen Sauerland to the vacant Position 2 on the Planning Board.) Councilmember Gould requested background informa- ion on Jurgen Sauerland. Council President Kasper noted that last week the Council had told Dick Beselin they would have a decision for him this week regarding the Harbor Square utility hook-up .,..'`' but the Council would like to delay that decision one more week while they discuss it se with the City Attorneys. City Engineer Jim Adams will notify Mr. Beselin.� Mayor Harrison had a letter from the Personnel Department indicating they will be using the Mountlake Terrace facilities to test potential Fire Department recruits and that Mountlake Terrace has requested that Edmonds sign a hold harmless agreement indemnifying Mountlake Terrace against any suit or claim arising from personal injury or other act in connection with the use of their facilities. City Attorney Wayne Tanaka had advised that the City Council should authorize the Mayor to sign the MOTION: agreement. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE REQUESTED HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT. MOTION CARRIED. (Council - members Allen and Nordquist were not present for the vote.) Mr. Tanaka said a copy should be forwarded to the City's insurance broker for information. Mayor Harrison had attended a kick-off meeting in support of SJR 143 which would make possible a Community Redevelopment Financing Act. He thought it had potential for developing public parking in Edmonds, and he distributed pamphlets regarding it. Councilmember Hall also had provided some written information to explain the concept. Councilmember Kasper commented that the Industrial Revenue Bonds Act will not cover the needs of Edmonds for public parking, but this may. Councilmember Allen arrived at this time, 7:45 p.m. Councilmember Nordquist was not present until the discussion with the Edmonds Council of Concerned Citizens was under way. REPORT FROM SUNSET AVE. COMMITTEE Planning Director Mary Lou Block said the Committee last met on September 16, 1982 with the two main topics of discussion being the planters and the need for improved communication with the young people who frequent the Sunset area. Both of these subjects are being explored further and should be covered in a later report to the Council, probably in mid -January. The City has a new landscape architect who will work on some sketches for the permanent planters. They will be very simple with poured -in -place curbing and containing landscaping and grass. Preliminary cost estimates are approximately $10,000, and Ms. Block did not know whether this would be an appropriate use of park funds. Councilmember Gould said that funds beyond the 1982 budget should be included in the budget sessions so they will know whether they need to find more money. Councilmember Naughten was opposed to the planter boxes and the curb idea because he thought they would eliminate the public's use of a natural asset. He thought the problem could be solved by more police enforcement. Mayor Harrison noted that the expense of extra policemen would offset that figure. Police Chief Marlo Foster said they probably spent $5,000 in overtime this year policing Sunset. He noted that the size of the area there really can only accommodate about half of the people who go there and a lot of the congestion was because of just too many people. He did not think they could accomplish any more enforcement than what they had done, and he thought sight distance between cars down there had to be broken up, which is the purpose of the planters. He said he had put teams of policemen walking down there, but nothing happens when they are present. He felt that wherever you have too many people in a public place there will always be an impact on the residential area there. He did not think the development of Union Oil Beach would lessen the problems at Sunset Ave. because at Sunset cars can cruise and be seen cruising which is what the young people want. Councilmember Kasper thought the control this year was much better, but he could not be sure that these items were what caused the solution and he did not know whether the money should be spent to install the planters permanently. Councilmember Gould reminded the Council of the problems last year as compared to this year, noting that what they did this summer EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - October 12, 1982 .0000 r- M E PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING 3-HOUR PARKING FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. ON BELL AND EDMONDS STS. FROM SUNSET TO THIRD AVE. AND ON SECOND AND THIRD AVES. FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CASPERS ST [Item (G) on Consent Agenda] Councilmember Nordquist acknowledged a letter from Mary Duke of 529 Third Ave. objecting to this proposal and he thought there possibly should be another hearing on it. Councilmember Hall agreed and said the City Clerk had alerted her to the fact that there are residential parking permits issued to other residents in the City for a fee and that this should be considered before treating the residents of these streets differently, and possibly the entire system should be changed. Council President Kasper said he thought another hearing was in order. After discussing a hearing date MOTION: with Mrs. Duke, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO jf_6 HAVE ANOTHER HEARING ON THIS ITEM ON OCTOBER 19, 1982. MOTION CARRIED. MAYOR Mayor Harrison presented a memorandum regarding the preliminary budget which he said is a 4.6% increase over that of 1982 and is balanced and requires no new taxes. He briefly reviewed his memorandum, describing the actions taken to balance the budget. Councilmember Hall complimented the Mayor and the Finance Director on the preliminary budget. Councilmember Nordquist noted at this time that Item 6 on the agenda, "Hearing on Reconsideration of Parking Formula for Downtown Business Area," was an item in which MOTION: Councilmember Gould wished to participate. THEREFORE, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, c?G-t,_ SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, THAT ITEM 6 BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 26, 19829 BUT AS A DISCUSSION ITEM AND NOT AS A HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. d AUDIENCE Dick Beselin, one of the Harbor Square developers, said they are in the construction of utilities for Harbor Square and there is a question as to whose responsibility it is to hook up the utilities between Dayton St. and Harbor Square. He reviewed what had happened in the past regarding the joint venture with the City and how he had absorbed additional costs of the improvements rather than approach the City again when the bids received were $24,000 higher than anticipated. The hook-up now in question will cost another $4,000-$5,000, and he said he previously had indicated this particular hook-up would not be a part of his costs, but he said the City seems to have misunderstood. He asked that the problem be recognized and a solution found. Al Morgan of Reid -Middleton & Associates, the engineers for Mr. Beselin on this project, said he thought the misunderstanding occurred in the initial discussion when they were concerned with a basin -wide solution and Bill Nims and he had gone over a number of ways to solve the drainage, making a "best guess" as to what the costs would be. He said the question is whether it would go to the curb line or stop at the catch basins, and he said their opinion was that the responsibility of the developers would stop at the catch basins. He said the developers intend completing the road system before the winter sets in so completion of the storm lines becomes paramount at this time. He identified on a drawing the hook-up in question. Bill Nims said it was his recollection that the City Engineer had said the developer's responsibility was to the curb line. Councilmember Hall recalled that Jim Reid went over the ranges of curbing, etc., and in her mind Beselin and Associates were responsible to the curb line. Mr. Nims said he had listened to the tapes of the discussion but they did not help to clarify the question. Councilmember Hall said she felt the Council really did a good job that night working quickly with Mr. Beselin to resolve the problem. Mr. Beselin responded that they had been ready to go on the bids when Mr. Adams asked them to put the combined system proposal before the Council and that Mr. Adams had said if the Council did not approve it he would then approve the system Mr. Beselin had ready. He said he had not asked a favor of the City or the Council, and that his original system would have been much less expensive to him. He said he already had absorbed $9,000412,000 over the original estimate, the $15,000 original estimate having come from the City Engineer who really did not have enough time in which to do it. He said he was trying back in February to put together a combined system but the response from the City Engineer's office had been poor and it took into July before all this happened. Councilmember Kasper said he wanted to EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - October 5, 1982 rn r M be sure there were no trade-offs in that transaction, and Mr. Beselin responded that there were none whatsoever, and he said if he were dealing with another private entity he would have split the additional costs with the other party. He said he had nothing to benefit from this but the City did. Mr. Nims stated that the tapes indicated it was the feeling of the Council that they would participate with Mr. Beselin to do the system to the curb line but no motions were made to indicate that. Mr. Tanaka stated that another question is whether the City's approval of the Beselin system contemplated his going to the curb line. He said there was originally a plan approved and the disagreement is whether or not that original plan would require them to go to the property line and get water from upstream. Councilmember Kasper said his reasoning was that the City was taking care of that water if and when they did it, and the Beselin proposal was for their project. He said he thought they were going at least to the property line and somebody said it had to go to the curb line. Mr. Beselin said the estimate of $15,000 was done quickly and they agreed to absorb the extra, but when it came to another $4,000 they did not think they should also absorb that. MOTION: COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO TAKE THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE NEXT WEEK. He said by that time Mr. Adams will have returned and also in the interim he could study the tapes of the previous discussion. Otherwise, he said, they would have no choice but to leave it where it was. THE MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO VACATE ALLEY LOCATED EAST OF 7TH AVE., SOUTH OF FIR, NORTH OF ELM, AND WEST OF "B" AVE. (ST-4-82) Planning Director Mary Lou Block said this hearing had been continued to allow time for the staff to contact one property owner who had not signed the petition. That property owner was sent a notice but no response was received. Ms. Block said a further development had occurred with the discovery of a private drainage line constructed within the alley which was never dedicated to the City. She recommended that if the vacation were approved it be with the provision that the abutting property owners grant easements to each other for the maintenance and operation of the private drainage line, in addition to the conditions stated by the Hearing Examiner. Council - member Nordquist asked if the parties would work out the easements amongst themselves, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka responded that they would but that the City should receive copies. Ms. Block noted that the Council could exclude the one piece of property and retain it as right-of-way. No one in the audience wished to speak on MOTION: this matter. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE VACATION REQUESTED IN ST-4-82, EXCEPT FOR THE NORTH PORTION OF PROPERTY ABUTTING 1122 "B" Ave, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS GRANTING EASEMENTS TO EACH OTHER FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE LINE, AND THAT THE OWNERS OF EACH BENEFITTING PROPERTY BE CHARGED $250 FOR THE VACATED PROPERTY. (The $250 figure was based on the charge to property owners involved in a recent nearby alley vacation inasmuch as an appraisal would be costly.) MOTION CARRIED. HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF PORTION OF ALLEY BETWEEN SPRAGUE AND DALEY, 7TH TO 8TH AVES. - (ST-6-82) The Council had been provided a copy of the Hearing Examiner's report recommending approval of the subject vacation, subject to the condition that upon vacation the adjoining property owners should each receive 7 1/2' of the vacated right-of-way, but if an adjoining property owner does not desire to receive the land the City should make adjustments accordingly. Planning Director Mary Lou Block located the subject alley on a vicinity map, noting that there is no access from 8th Ave. to the alley at this time and that there is approximately a 25% slope to the alley. The City had requested easements from the property owners for improvements to the Shell Creek drainage system, and that was one of the considerations in the City's passing a resolution to initiate the vacation action. Ms. Block read aloud the conclusions of the Hearing Examiner and displayed a drawing which reflected the stream crossing the alley. The hearing was opened. Mrs. Gunnard Swanson, 216 Sunset Ave., said the stream is eroding her property. W. M. Brennan, 756 Daley St., identified his property north of the creek and said there was no objection from the neighbors except for the Hardestys who do not want EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - October 5, 1982 PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING 3-HOUR PARKING FROM 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. ON BELL AND EDMONDS STS. FROM SUNSET TO THIRD AVE. AND ON SECOND AND THIRD AVES. FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO CASPERS ST [Item (G) on Consent Agenda] Councilmember Nordquist acknowledged a letter from Mary Duke of 529 Third Ave. objecting to this proposal and he thought there possibly should be another hearing on it. Councilmember Hall agreed and said the City Clerk had alerted her to the fact that there are residential parking permits issued to other residents in the City for a fee and that this should be considered before treating the residents of these streets differently, and possibly the entire system should be changed. Council President Kasper said he thought another hearing was in order. After discussing a hearing date MOTION: with Mrs. Duke, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO fl� cj 7� HAVE ANOTHER HEARING ON THIS ITEM ON OCTOBER 19, 1982. MOTION CARRIED. MAYOR Mayor Harrison presented a memorandum regarding the preliminary budget which he said is a 4.6% increase over that of 1982 and is balanced and requires no new taxes. He briefly reviewed his memorandum, describing the actions taken to balance the budget. Councilmember Hall complimented the Mayor and the Finance Director on the preliminary budget. Councilmember Nordquist noted at this time that Item 6 on the agenda, "Hearing on Reconsideration of Parking Formula for Downtown Business Area," was an item in which r'!TION: Councilmember Gould wished to participate. THEREFORE, COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, 4:tz ,SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, THAT ITEM 6 BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 26, 1982, BUT AS A DISCUSSION ITEM AND NOT AS A HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Dick Beselin, one of the Harbor Square developers, said they are in the construction of utilities for Harbor Square and there is a question as to whose responsibility it is to hook up the utilities between Dayton St. and Harbor Square. He reviewed what had happened in the past regarding the joint venture with the City and how he had absorbed additional costs of the improvements rather than approach the City again when the bids received were $24,000 higher than anticipated. The hook-up now in question will cost another $4,000-$5,000, and he said he previously had indicated this particular hook-up would not be a part of his costs, but he said the City seems to have misunderstood. He asked that the problem be recognized and a solution found. Al Morgan of Reid -Middleton & Associates, the engineers for Mr. Beselin on this project, said he thought the misunderstanding occurred in the initial discussion when they were concerned with a basin -wide solution and Bill Nims and he had gone over a number of ways to solve the drainage, making a "best guess" as to what the costs would be. He said the question is whether it would go to the curb line or stop at the catch basins, and he said their opinion was that the responsibility of the developers would stop at the catch basins. He said the developers intend completing the road system before the winter sets in so completion of the storm lines becomes paramount at this time. He identified on a drawing the hook-up in question. Bill Nims said it was his recollection that the City Engineer had said the developer's responsibility was to the curb line. Councilmember Hall recalled that Jim Reid went over the ranges of curbing, etc., and in her mind Beselin and Associates were responsible to the curb line. Mr. Nims said he had listened to the tapes of the discussion but they did not help to clarify the question. Councilmember Hall said she felt the Council really did a good job that night working quickly with Mr. Beselin to resolve the problem. Mr. Beselin responded that they had been ready to go on the bids when Mr. Adams asked them to put the combined system proposal before the Council and that Mr. Adams had said if the Council did not approve it he would then approve the system Mr. Beselin had ready. He said he had not asked a favor of the City or the Council, and that his original system would have been much less expensive to him. He said he already had absorbed $9,000412,000 over the original estimate, the $15,000 original estimate having come from the City Engineer who really did not have enough time in which to do it. He said he was trying back in February to put together a combined system but the response from the City Engineer's office had been poor and it took into July before all this happened. Councilmember Kasper said he wanted to ' LE PageN2S-COctoberITY N5IL1982UTES STRKT be sure there were no trade-offs in that transaction, and Mr. Beselin responded that there were none whatsoever, and he said if he were dealing with another private entity he would have split the additional costs with the other party. He said he had nothing to benefit from this but the City did. Mr. Nims stated that the tapes indicated it was the feeling of the Council that they would participate with Mr. Beselin to do the system to the curb line but no motions were made to indicate that. Mr. Tanaka stated that another question is whether the City's approval of the Beselin system contemplated his going to the curb line. He said there was originally a plan approved and the disagreement is whether or not that original plan would require them to go to the property line and get water from upstream. Councilmember Kasper said his reasoning was that the City was taking care of that water if and when they did it, and the Beselin proposal was for their project. He said he thought they were going at least to the property line and somebody said it had to go to the curb line. Mr. Beselin said the estimate of $15,000 was done quickly and they agreed to absorb the extra, but when it came to another $4,000 they did not think they should also absorb that. MOTION: COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO TAKE THIS MATTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE NEXT WEEK. He said by that time Mr. Adams will have returned and also in the interim he could study the tapes of the previous discussion. Otherwise, he said, they would have no choice but to leave it where it was. THE MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO VACATE ALLEY LOCATED EAST OF 7TH AVE., SOUTH OF FIR, NORTH OF ELM, AND WEST OF "B" AVE. (ST-4-82) Planning Director Mary Lou Block said this hearing had been continued to allow time for the staff to contact one property owner who had not signed the petition. That property owner was sent a notice but no response was received. Ms. Block said a further development had occurred with the discovery of a private drainage line constructed within the alley which was never dedicated to the City. She recommended that if the vacation were approved it be with the provision that the abutting property owners grant easements to each other for the maintenance and operation of the private drainage line, in addition to the conditions stated by the Hearing Examiner. Council - member Nordquist asked if the parties would work out the easements amongst themselves, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka responded that they would but that the City should receive copies. Ms. Block noted that the Council could exclude the one piece of property and retain it as right-of-way. No one in the audience wished to speak on MOTION: this matter. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE VACATION REQUESTED IN ST-4-82, EXCEPT FOR THE NORTH PORTION OF PROPERTY ABUTTING 1122 "B" Ave, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN THE HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS GRANTING EASEMENTS TO EACH OTHER FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE LINE, AND THAT THE OWNERS OF EACH BENEFITTING PROPERTY BE CHARGED $250 FOR THE VACATED PROPERTY. (The $250 figure was based on the charge to property owners involved in a recent nearby alley vacation inasmuch as an appraisal would be costly.) MOTION CARRIED. HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF PORTION OF ALLEY BETWEEN SPRAGUE AND DALEY, 7TH TO 8TH AYES. - (ST-6-82) The Council had been provided a copy of the Hearing Examiner's report recommending approval of the subject vacation, subject to the condition that upon vacation the adjoining property owners should each receive 7 1/2' of the vacated right-of-way, but if an adjoining property owner does not desire to receive the land the City should make adjustments accordingly. Planning Director Mary Lou Block located the subject alley on a vicinity map, noting that there is no access from 8th Ave. to the alley at this time and that there is approximately a 25% slope to the alley. The City had requested easements from the property owners for improvements to the Shell Creek drainage system, and that was one of the considerations in the City's passing a resolution to initiate the vacation action. Ms. Block read aloud the conclusions of the Hearing Examiner and displayed a drawing which reflected the stream crossing the alley. The hearing was opened. Mrs. Gunnard Swanson, 216 Sunset Ave., said the stream is eroding her property. W. M. Brennan, 756 Daley St., identified his property north of the creek and said there was no objection from the neighbors except for the Hardestys who do not want EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - October 5, 1982 4 77 File No. 05.2.02 • October 1, 1982 MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison v Mayor FROM; James E. Adams City Engineer SUBJECT; `HARBOR SOUARE`/DAYTON STREET DRAINAGE The City budgeted $125,000.00 for the improvement of Dayton Street' in 1982,.The development of Harbor. Square was approved with verti— cal alignment of the south curb of Dayton requiring interface with the City. The most economically feasible method of draining storm water from Dayton Street and the Safeway property was through the Harbor Square site to the marsh. The developer presented a drainage plan to accommodate draining his site only, The staff discussed.this with the* developer and recommended a combined drainage system to provide adequate drainage for the total area. This concept was presented to the City -Council on July 20, 1982, by Mr, Beselin • (copy of City Council Minutes and a letter from Harbor Square to the City Council dated July 20, 1982, attached). The City Council requested additional information be presented the following week, On July 27, 1982, this matter was discussed at the Finance Committee Meeting and further discussed by City Council item, "Approval of. Consultant Selection -Dayton St. Improvements, Railroad Ave. to SP. 104" (.copy of.City Council -Minutes attached), It was our understanding that the Council authorized the expenditure not to exceed $15,000.00 to be paid to Harbor Square to increase . capacity of his system and provide drainage pipes for the storm drainage of Dayton Street and Safeway property,. This would allow the development of Dayton Street without removing the improvements to be installed by Harbor Square, such as curb, paving, and sidewalk, The Council further authorized the firm of Reid, Middleton & Associates. to complete 'the design of Dayton Street Improvements and to construct the project if the total construction cost did not exceed $46,000,00,, Mr. Beselin submitted his drainage plan to the City Engineer for approval. This plan included the drainage for Dayton Street and exten- sion into Safeway property. It was noted.on the plan that the Dayton Street crossing was not to be constructed by M .`-Beselin. He has now indicated that .his agreement with the City did not include the connec- tion of the Dayton Street system to his drainage system. STF� T FILE L� • , Harve H. Harrison, Mayor Page 2 October 1,, 1982 Our estimate of the cost of the installation of the drainage pipes from Harbor Square to the south curb of Dayton Street is $3,688.00. Mr. Beselin submitted his cost estimate for upgrading the system to handle the Dayton Street and Safeway drainage. The quantities appear to be correct but have not been verified by staff. His cost of $27,040.00 does not include the pipes to connect the Dayton Street drainage to his system. We made an independent cost estimate based on his quantities. Our ' estimate of differential cost is $21,409.00 and $3,688,00 for the connecting pipes. (Copy of letter dated September 29, 1982, from Harbor Square is attached). We request further clarification of the agreement between,the City , and Harbor Square. We will be available to discuss this item if you wish. JEA:WJN:rm Attachments (4) JAMES E. ADAMS, City Engineer • L= J July �20, 1982 TO: City Council - pir. Oi Public Works FROM: Harbor Square Associates SUBJECT: Joint Venture for Storm Sewer Relief on Dayton Street from i SR 104 to Burlington Northern Tracks Harbor Square Associates presently has submitted, to the City of Edmond's Engineering Department, a storm sewer system to handle drainage require- ments foi Harbor Square, comprising of approximately 10.9 acres. This submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent.Dayton Street, and Safeway: lot drainage. An alternate plan; at this time, would provide for future requirements to handle:volumes of water from Dayton Street and Safeway. Considerable saving could be realized by the City of Edmonds as determined by the City Engineerir Department and our engineers, Reid Middleton & Associates. Such possible coy expenditure viould involve the engineering and oversizing of present system b) Harbor Square Associates to handle future drainage needs i'rom the adjacent Dayton Street and Safeway, parking lot. ).t is estimated that such cost at this time would amount to approximately $6,000. The estimated future cost to provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 or a potential savings of $19,000. The reason for this proposal, at.this time, is that Harbor Square Associates has been under the impression -for several months that improvements to Dayton Street were to be completed this summer and would possibly be concurrent with the construction,of utilities for Harbor Square. We have been advised in the last week that improvements to Dayton Street will not commence at this time and are delayed indefinitely. There is no apparent advantage to Harbor Square as a result of this proposal. The.Engineering Department recognizes the potential of this proposal and, in the spirit of cooperation, we wish to submit it accordingly. Harbor Square Assoc s July 20, 1982 .r Page 2 ,Mow, 1 • i; il� Irlpp ' If acce ted b the City Council we ask only that p y ,� y the following e conditions' apply: 1. The. City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of engineering. 2. The City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of construction over our proposed system as presently submitted. 3. The maintenance of that portion of system,, where a tie-in is involved, be maintained by the City of Edmonds. In order.to take advantage of weather, time is of the essence as we expect to begin construction upon approval of engineering plans by July 30, 1982. Should the City Council not act on this proposal at this time, we will proceed accordingly with already submitted plans. in her decision making, wheth*e agreed with them or when the Council .� worOessential found their as to proce Mr. Phillips asked for an understanding fin before the Council changes a fPABinding it be not. if the rent help to the receives the PAB recocrmendation, and that Dave Larson said it would be a g second class their meetings. He thought they were getting remanded to the PAB. he thought the communication Director attended Planning and by not having the Planning Director there, of the Planning �if • treatment resented at a suggestediaplsovthated between the PAB and the Council wouldnew evidence is h Director at their meetings.AB to item be remanded to eHedthoughtHthe Council meeting that the esPpeoplecwouldelearnt that happ he the Council to also thought that after good one, but asked consolidation of boards into the PAB was a 9 1 He admitted that some of experienced people. Council trust the PAB as it consists of good, may not be the same as the Council would make, but he said tions'She is nt s with a their decisions nd the B and makes Political detico toplanningmatterPsotheyvmayhavea little is elected s, different perspective, are looking at the whole City and those residents they frus�iated bit longer range perspective.as be appearing. Valina Walker emphasized that they have felt govern their role in City 9 may not and said anything the Council can do to help them define ment is what they need. be incorporated into the l's Councilmember Allen thought their suggestions could ediatCounc often people appear who say they have to have irtmediate have procedures. She noted that decisions, and she thought the Council would have to tell them they should Gould thought the PAB should provide a"lace in eCity have thought about it earlier. Councilmember e who to do abouttgetting independent system wherein bodywhichcantsay--withouthhaving toworry before a nonpolitical body the fpossiblyyechanging ethe that for the btliefPA6 even re -elected --this is what you have to do must find a way to make the people appearHe also thought a list of "advisory" terminology. name of the Board to remove the the PAB should be established.additWon tthoseed aassignedBbyathe City projects for toas right to pick some of its own projects, back to having hearings on the record Council. Mayor Harrison suggested going re-examine he was to Coucilmemer he thought and whilet instead of de "after at de novo aspect t1990." HeSthoughththeoPAB�could the Councilsis dHscuss�ngu9Edmondsgested was probablythe n the the retreat the an dathat Cexchangingouncil ltheogoalssa d�talkingebetweencthem. build its set ofgoals halftdayould take a Saturdayon a thought ehearings,iiandPCity�ps • CouncilmemberAl pursued the suggestion change thehdedonovoaaspect ofdCouncil k chanld ean thatdiscuss wtthdtheaPlanningaDirector edahCode would take Attorney Wayne matter.said hearing on the or s ' of her attending the PAB meet . �in e-pQ5 bil-It D4 S SELECTION - DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD A / APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT e the or that item hadbeend t City brecommendedethat Reidm,dMiddletonband week'sthis a proposalms lastdmeeting. for the ssaidithe Square pes b Het Harbor Associates be on answered some oftheReid EIS did address the matterlma�shhand asaid therenwilltbe Square ld be dfschargedeintopthe 30tdaybe drawings where ��r s. oil separator devices hermarsis obtai0ned,rwhuchewillatake he to protictathe the the discharged change linecrown Reid said the drainage system would not it wouldhave alongthe curb butcinsplacesmajor street. He said it would be 3"- 4", r flow ladditing theengineer- 1 1/2'. He did not mentionlathere. theonal to be raised to Regarding going down Dayton, saying there are problems and was estimate was about d70 ing costs to the City, he said the total cost $5 told it would cost b5,000 - that beenwould already covered. It was notedwi MtheBCouncilshad 0 ION: S15,000 if �:e�. �„t�.,� Q•� , R�DQ U :°'77TTT- ROLE L ' r ECDtiDE BiiR Y CQU4t �; IMEM '�I�� V '1�f °�RaIN j ROSC t�H �SIARBOft ,SUARE� °ASrPER`7F'`��`�O�a�t�R SSTREE„7 +., •.;:,� DEftpDA,Y7QF.,�S�•��•• EDMONDS CITYCOUNCIL page 3 - July27, c. i�,YK'1t{• 1 • ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 104 LATER. Mayor MerrisoA sa/d 1� Finance Committee to forego an LID on the street with Ftorbpr Sauery p'y�j,q'•�fb►;Uj , drainage system as designed by Jim Reid, and with the City picking up t1+a amt,ra1;irs1" costs of the street. He said that would leave out the Safeway people because the burden of bringing up and building a sidewalk on their side would be their share. Mr. Beselin said the cost of° theirs stem will be $16,000 and b their Y y proposal last week they would be allowing the City to use a portion of the system they will be putting in. He said they are trying to get the City and Safeway to use their system. Also, they are cooperating with Community Transit to provide a curb cut for their buses which are now on Dayton St. and which he felt would help the City, so he felt they were handling a good portion of this. He said he could not address an LID because they are not the property owners. Dr. Robert Barnes said he did not know what his responsibility was at this time because his property was being sold, but the new owners want to build it up to make it consistent with Dayton St. } Councilmember Kasper felt Mr. Beselin's offer should be accepted. He still questioned i. carrying it across the street from the budget, and he said he thought an LiD to be in order in light of the magnitude of costs and the property to the north. He said there is a budget problem and even if they spend $65,000-$80,000 in that spot they still do not know where the money will be coming from. In answer to a question, Jeff Ristau said there is $25,000 budgeted in the 112 Fund. Councilmember Allen urged going further with the project, saying that area is really depressed and a lot of people are walking now. Mr. Adams said Mr. Beselin was coming in with his plans and 1 it would have to be determined what the curb line will be as to elevation or there will be a barrier from the street to his property. 'THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember ! Kasper said the Street Fund is limited and he felf the curbs could be put in on the south side at the proper elevation but he thought they should consider an LID on a matching basis, including the City, for a development between SR 104 and the railroad tracks because that is fill property and they do not know when the northerly property will be done. He felt an LID would solve the entire thing. Councilmember Gould said i there is S150,000 in the budoet, and that they could regulate the amount of risk by determining how far up the hill they go --if they end up $10,000 short they chop it off a block. He had discussed the.project with the Public Works Department and had looked at the street, and he felt it did have to be done, so he :thought it best to go forward with the project. Councilmember Hall agreed, saying she also had been to the Public Works Department and had looked at the street many times. Mr. Adams noted that the original item on the agenda was to select a consultant, and he wanted to address the selection • of a consultant to do the final design, after which he would be much better able to MOTION: answer the questions of cost. COUNCiLMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION BY Failed COUNCILMEMBER GOULD. TO DESIGNATE $65,000 FOR THE RENOVATION OF DAYTON ST. FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104. The question was asked as to where the funds would come from, and she said from 110 and 112 Funds (which would be spending next year's alloca- tion of 110 money). Councilmember Gould thought everybody's hands would be forced by fixing the street. Councilmember Kasper said he would vote against the motion because he felt the costs were not established and he did not think the street would be built on the money being projected. Councilmember Jaech noted that not too long ago there was a presentation of a sidewalk plan for the City and a number of hearings were held and people wanted to know why they had to pay to put in their sidewalks. She said either way the City will generally tax everybody to put in sidewalks or else everybody would pay for sidewalks in their area. She said this $65,000 will include $19,000 for sidewalks. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HALL AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH KASPER N JJ4LLEN, AND JAECH MOTION: VOTING N0. MOTION FAILED. U LM NBER_' f�li0. : _,S..,G' M�� Ara- 9'P..POTi.TIn131�ON=TAN[i1Rt±rIT04KENilEO_°13Y t1TF7. J . : , n •. MOTION: MR FHEN"MU9ED fi EOONUE DYa COUKt;;1LMEr18ER L f6'; N.— Amended G li fi 0b, b'�P ' effb ROM`fRA`TL>tO D` A 1` 'r0�°kSl i 4; WI ti filNDS TO 60P( -• R6"PPLiCABI SIRE-ii AND GAS TAX MONEY, WITH THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH TO BE PAiD ` FOR BY THE SAFEWAY PROPERTY OWNER AND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY BESELIN (HARBOR SQUARE). COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT IF THE COST ESTIMATES ARE IN EXCESS OF THAT AN LID WILL BE FORMED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN Oil THE MOTION TO AMEND, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, ALLEN, NORDQUIST, AND JAECH VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS GOULD AND HALL VOTING NO. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, THEN CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - July 27, 1982 4. ' j.••••�•i,••: JIO.tl.Ai65�1`:.il. J :L..W.f4 :r1:�.ui:.:�i]nL±,,O�% I: Siu:��•4i��::•.-•'.�'�T{ ; ize D►t• Dl Pub1 � ' �'�• September 29, 1982 1 ' f� :I d'1 �I, • 1 4. ` Jim Adams , Engineer ' �'• City of Edmonds Engineering Dept.' 200 Dayton Edmonds o WA .,8020 , Dear Jim: • Per our meeting and discussion -with Reid Middleton yesterday, !: September 28,1982, please find enclosed a copy of the upgrade 1 I; costs to handle Dayton and Safeway drainage. j Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerel Dick Besel i n BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOC. DB: sb ! < Enclosure is 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 ; 3 :7 BASIC. (4 system) 8" Aluminum Pipe 101, " 12" of n 1511 it to 1 811 11 II 21"If 21" Concrete Pipe 24" " to • 2711 7" " '1 155" Catch Basin 1 619 It it 48" Man Hole 72" 11 if • 'Y UPGRADE TO HANDLE DAYTON AND SAFEWAY DRAINAGE COMBINED (City) 50 L.F. 349 L.F. .300 L.F. 106 L.F. 1623 L.F. 626 L.F. 412 L.F. 482 L.F. 76 L.F. : 385 L.F. - • 42 L.F. 287 L.F. 212 L.F. 230 L.F. 22 L.F. 14 L.F. 7 L.F. 4 L.F. 6 L.F. TOTAL COST DIFFERENTIAL $27,014 I ADJUSTMENT ; Add 299 L' F Delete 194 L.T. Delete 997 L.F. Add 70 L.F. Add 309 L.F. Add 42 L.F. ;• ;' :,: Add 287 L.F. Add 212 L.F. Add 230 L.F. Delete 8 Add 7 Add��'' 2 r . •�: . Add 1 ( "i March 26, 1979 MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison Mayor FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: REPORT FROM COMMITTEE STUDYING POLICY ON: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Professional Services Policy Review Committee consisting of Messrs. Carns, Gould, LaTourelle, Larson and Herzberg, met on Febraury 27, 1979, to discuss and review the proposed policy. They agreed that the enclosed policy be recommended to the Council for approval. The policy is intended to cover the procurement of all consulting services for the City except those which, in the judgement of the program manager, are minor in nature or are of such a scope that they can reasonably be assigned to an obviously well -qualified professional who possesses particular background or experience to perform the work. It is, therefore, recommended that the proposed policy be adopted by the City Council. FFH:iak MEMO TO: FROM: Harve H. Harrison Mayor James E. Adams City Engineer • File No. 05.2.02 October 1, 1982 STRFFTFi`F SUBJECT: `HARBOR SQUARE/DAYTON STREET DRAINAGE The City budgeted $125,000.00 for the improvement of Dayton Street in 1982. The development of Harbor Square was approved with verti- cal alignment of the south curb of Dayton requiring interface with the City. The most economically feasible method of draining storm water from Dayton Street and the Safeway property was through the Harbor Square site to the marsh. The developer presented a drainage plan to accommodate draining his site only, The staff discussed this with the developer and recommended a combined drainage system to provide adequate drainage for the total area. This concept was presented to the City Council on July 20, 1982, by Mr. Beselin (copy of City Council Minutes and a letter from Harbor Square to the City Council dated July 20, 1982, attached.). The City Council requested additional information be presented the following week. On July 27, 1982, this matter was discussed at the Finance Committee Meeting and further discussed by City Council item, "Approval of Consultant Selection -Dayton St. Improvements, Railroad Ave. to SR 104" (copy of City Council Minutes attached), It was our understanding that the Council authorized the expenditure not to exceed $15,000.00 to be paid to Harbor Square to increase capacity of his system and provide drainage pipes for the storm drainage of Dayton Street and Safeway property. This would allow the development of Dayton Street without removing the improvements to be installed by Harbor Square, such as curb, paving, and sidewalk. The Council further authorized the firm of Reid, Middleton & Associates to complete the design of Dayton Street Improvements and to construct the project if the total construction cost did not exceed $46,000.00. Mr. Beselin submitted his drainage plan to the City Engineer for approval. This plan included the drainage for'Dayton Street and exten- sion into Safeway property. It was noted on the plan that the Dayton Street crossing was not to be constructed by Mr. Beselin. He -has now indicated that his agreement with the City did not include the connec- tion of the Dayton Street system to his drainage system. (J,P- Harve H. Harrison, Mayor Page 2 October 1, 1982 Our estimate of the cost of the installation of the drainage pipes from Harbor Square to the south curb of Dayton Street is $3,688.00. Mr. Beselin submitted his cost estimate for upgrading the system to handle the Dayton Street and Safeway drainage. The quantities appear to be correct but have not been verified by staff. His cost of $27,040.00 does not include the pipes to connect the Dayton Street drainage to his system. We made an independent cost estimate based on his quantities. Our estimate of differential cost is $21,409,00 and $3,688.00 for the connecting pipes. (Copy of letter dated September 29, 1982, from Harbor Square is attached). We request further clarification of the agreement between the City and Harbor Square. We will be available to discuss this item if you wish. UAMLS E. ADAMS, City Engineer JEA:WJN:rm Attachments (4) 1 THES UTES SUBJECT RECEIVE TO JUL 7 APPROVAL D JUL 2 3 1982 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING 0I Public Works July 20, 1982 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Harve Harrison in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present Joined to the flag salute. PRESENT Harve Harrison, Mayor Bill Kasper Laura Hall Jo -Anne Jaech Ray Gould Larry Naughten John Nordquist Katherine Allen CONSENT AGENDA STAFF DRFSFNT Jim Adams, City Engineer Jack Mitchell, Public Works Superintendent Mary Lou Block, Planning Director Jeff Ristau, Accountant Dan Prinz, Police Chief Jack Weinz, Fire Chief Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Mark Eames, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk Items (8) and (D) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, MOTION: SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following: (A) Roll call. (C) Acknowledgment of receipt of Claim for Damages from Mrs. Beulah Rierson in the amount of $3,000. (E) Mid -year financial status report. /Y (F) Authorization for informal sale of Unit 29 (1969 Dodge Dart). APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1982 Item (8) on Consent Aoendal Councilmember Hall noted that on page 6 of the Minutes, the third paragraph, it was she who.had been contacted by Peggy Harris, rather than Councilmember Allen. COUNCIL- � Vilt'MEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 13, MOTION: 1982 WITH THAT CORRECTION, APPROVING ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN UNION OIL CITY OF EDMONDS BEACH LEASE LItem D on Consent AgendaJ Councilmember Allen had no problem with this but she thought this would be a good time to ask publicly about the parking situation there, i.e., when will the additional parking be provided. Since no representative of the Parks and Recreation Department was present, Councilmember Allen asked for a report next week as to the timing (not to be an agenda item). Robert Woehrmann of the Union Oil Company was asked his opinion of the City's development of the peach, and he responded that a fine job of MOTION: landscaping had been done. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE ITEM (D) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Harrison thanked the Union Oil representatives on behalf of the City for leasing the beach to the City for only $300 per year. It is a five-year lease. �� " AUDIENCE 0l. Dick Beselin of the Harbor Square Associates discussed a proposal for a joint venture 3 with the City for storm sewer relief on Dayton St. from SR 104 to the railroad tracks. s= Mr. Beselin said Harbor Square Associates already had submitted to the Engineering Department a storm sewer system to handle the drainage requirements for Harbor Square but that submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent Dayton St. and Safeway lot drainage. An alternate plan would provide for future requirements to handle water from Dayton St. and Safeway, but additional engineering and oversizing }e of the present system would be required. The estimate for the additional costs was $6,000, and Mr. Beselin said future cost to.provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 (going across the Harbor Square property to the marsh to release the water). He said Harbor Square had nothing to gain by this proposal, and they were submitting it in the spirit of cooperation. The conditions of their proposal were that the City agree to the additional cost of engineering; the City agree to additional cost of construction over their proposed system currently submitted; and that the maintenance of that portion of the system where a tie-in is involved be accomplished by the City. They required an immediate response because they were ready to commence construction. City Engineer Jim Adams said the elevation of a portion of Dayton St. and the Safeway parking lot will have to be raised 18" or more to get rid of the water, and with this proposal it gives the City the opportunity to take care of this problem --which is not a Port or Harbor Square problem. He said if the City waits to do it in the future it will not only have to tear up the area but will have to do it all at City cost. Dr. Barnes, owner of the Safeway property, felt he had been caught in the middle. He said for the last several years he had been frustrated in trying to correct the problem and it is impossible for him to do so without the City's cooperation. He said the water goes down Dayton and backs up on his property and has buckled the sidewalk, and the north side of Dayton is lower than the south side. He thought this proposal to be a partial solution to the problem, and said he intends to get the problem fixed this year as he has had threats that Safeway may move. Councilmember Kasper said this had to go to the Finance Committee and an answer could be given next ION: week. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO EXPAND THE JULY 6„a,,,27 CONSULTANT SELECTION DISCUSSION RELATING TO THE DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS TO INCORPORATE THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPOSAL, AND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE FURNISHED TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW THEM TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS. STAFF IS TO LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE DRAWINGS ON 'THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPERTY AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS THE NECESSARY FEATURES TO PROTECT THE MARSH FROM POLLUTANTS; CHECK TO SEE IF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAN BE INSTALLED TO HANDLE THE WATER WITHOUT MAJOR STREET REBUILD; REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO HANDLE WATER COMING DOWN DAYTON ST; AND ESTABLISH COSTS TO THE CITY FOR ENGINEERING.AND CONSTRUCTION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Beselin said they could not'wait as they have to start by August 1 and if they wait for the Council's answer next week that would not allow time for the new engineering to be accomplished and be approved by the City. It was finally agreed that the City would hire Reid -Middleton to prepare an alternate plan to handle the City's problems and both plans will be availabld for next weeks's meeting. Roy LaRue of the Edm6ads'SoftbaTT"715gocTatloVi saialthe"lights at the tamonas sign School football field are being changed and the School District is willing to sell the old poles and standards for $1,200 and the lights for $7.50 each (8 poles with 12 lights to a pole) and he asked that the City buy them for the softball field at the junior high playfield. His association was willing to contribute $500 towards the cost and he said the School District was willing to accept street sweeping for payment. He said they would put a timer on the lights so they would be turned off at 11:00 p.m., using them from 8:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. He was aware of the neighborhood controversy about the lighted soccer field and said these lights are not high intensity lights. Councilmember Kasper agreed that they are not high intensity, noting that the City tried to buy them previously but the School District was not ready to sell them at MOTION: that time. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO Amended AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT TO MAKE THE PURCHASE FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND, NOT ACCEPTING THE $500 FROM THE EDMONDS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION. It was determined that the funds were not available in the Council Contingency Fund. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST AMENDED HIS MOTION, ACCEPTABLE TO THE SECOND, TO TAKE THE FUNDS FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION FUND. Councilmember Gould asked if these actually are lights the City will use, saying he would prefer that this be set as an agenda item to give the Staff an opportunity to indicate if they really want them. Council - member Nordquist responded that this issue has been hanging and Jim Jessel had indicated to him that this would be a good acquisition. It was noted that there is an hourly rate established for street sweeping and that something may be worked out for a trade. Councilmember Nordquist asked that the Parks and Recreation Director make a recommendation as to the use of the poles. It was felt there should be a hearing to give people an opportunity to speak on this, especially the neighbors of MOTION: the playfield. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT THE STAFF PROVIDE INPUT ON AUGUST 3. 1982 AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD ON AUGUST 17, 1982. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - July 20, 1982 airlb or I quare iL Ju 1 y 20 , 1982 TO: City Council FROM: Harbor Square Associates SUBJECT: Joint Venture for Storm Sewer Relief on Dayton Street from SR 104 to Burlington Northern Tracks • Harbor Square Associates presently has submitted, to the City of Edmond's Engineering Department, a storm sewer system to handle drainage require- ments for Harbor Square, comprising of approximately 10.9 acres. This submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent Dayton Street and Safeway lot drainage. An alternate plan, at this time, would provide for future requirements to handle:volumes of water from Dayton Street and Safeway. Considerable savings could be realized by the City of Edmonds as determined by the City Engineering Department and our engineers, Reid Middleton & Associates. Such possible cost expenditure Mould involve the engineering and oversizing of present system by Harbor Square Associates to handle future drainage needs From the adjacent Dayton Street and Safeway parking lot. It is estimated that such cost at this time would amount to approximately $6,000. The estimated future cost to provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 or a potential savings of $19,000. The reason for this proposal, at this time, is that Harbor Square Associates has been under the impression for several months that improvements to Dayton Street were to be completed this summer and would possibly be concurrent with the construction of utilities for Harbor Square. We have been advised in the last ,reek that improvements to Dayton Street will not commence at this time and are delayed indefinitely. There is no apparent advantage to Harbor Square as a result of this proposal. The Engineering Department recognizes the potential of this proposal and, in the spirit of cooperation, we wish to submit it accordingly. Harbor Square Assoc ' July 20, 1982 Page 2 If accepted by the City Council, we ask only that the f ollowing conditions apply: 1. The City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of engineering. 2. The City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of construction over our proposed system as presently submitted. 3. The maintenance of that portion of system,. where a tie-in is involved, be maintained by the City of Edmonds. _ In order to take advantage of weather, time is of the essence as we expect to begin construction upon approval of engineering plans by July 30, 1982. Should the City Council not act on this proposal at this time, we will proceed accordingly with already submitted plans. t ' m or found their work essential in her decision making, whether she agreed with the when not. Mr. Philuncil lips asfor an uandrthatdbefore theas to pCouncilechangesha finding it be receives the PAS recommendation,reat help to the PAS if the thought theywere getting second class remanded to the PAS. Dave Larson said gs would e a 9 the communication Planning Direnotrhavingdtheed their PlanningtDirect He there, and he thought treatment by resented at a between the PAS and the Council suggestedialsovthat iif new evidence is 1 Planning Director at their meetings. He suggestedthe ence. He Council meeting that the item be remadedenednaefewotimesPpe plecwould elearn. eHedthought th_e also thought that after that happ but he asked the Council to consolidation of boards into of the PAS was a good one, trust the PAS as it consists ofsgood, asetherCouncdilpwould make. eople. He abut thedsaidtthe mCouncil their decisions may no have s little is elected and makepolitical decision , tonplanning8matteprsotheyvmaynd sits with e different perspective,are looking in the whole City and those residents bit longer range gearing. Valinae as hey Walker emphasized that they have felt frusLrated who may not be appearing. govern - and said anything the Council can do to help them define their role in City ment is what they need. have to have immediate Councilmember Allen thou to often peopletions appearould be who sayitheyporated into the Council s procedures. She note decisions, o Ldithearlier. CouncilmemberoGouldath ught thetPAS shouldhprovidevan thought ab in ce independent system wherein people who want to dwisomething ho thhaving toeworry about City have tgetting that before a nonpolitical body which can say-- He said they before the PAS, possibly even changing the re -elected --this is what you have to do for the benefit of the City. must find a way to make the people appearHe also thought a list of name of the Board to remove the "advisory terminology. projects for the PAS should beg stablishejectsn additwon to those as the 8wants it as noted that by the City right pick some o f its Council. Mayor Harrison suggested going back to having hearings on the record instead of de Councilmember mGdinoted effectaforha while, Was to re-exam and he th ughtithis he de novo as, after thenewsystemwassuggested that the PAB join the Council at was probably the time to do so. He also could the retreat when the oalsoandithat thel is Councilcould ssing ddolthe same, and uthen tthey Acould build its s 9 fir, Phillips take a Saturday and spend a half -day exchanging the goals and talking between i them. Councilmember Allen thought they might do that on a Wednesday evening. pursued the suggestion to change the de novo aspect of Council hearings, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka tter.said that or tarould takedahCode chanld ge anduss wouldtstar W1 ngaDirector hearing on the ma the possibility of her attending the PAS meetings. eve Tn cR 104 this ••----- s item h e the Harbor City Engineer Jim Adams noted that He recommended ethat Reidd to , Middleton and Square proposal made at last week's meeting. Associates be the consultant. and Jim Reid was present for the Hessaid ithe Harbor e1d answered some of the questions asked at the previous meeting. Square EIS did address the matter of drainagerged intopthe lmarshhand asaid there nwill tbe °n drawings where the h1r discharged hargedtintodevices marshprotect athe permitsis obtained, rwhich ewill atake 30tdayse disc 9 Reid said Hehsadrainage wouldsbem3w-u4a,not butcinsplacesmajor alongathe Curbthe linecrown it wouldhave the street. He did not but alternatives for handling the water flow to be raised yt 1 1sayi going down Dayton, City, he saidetheetotab1estimateewasRabouti$70the 000aandt$65a000nwaseer- ing costs to the City, been already covered. it jo s noted nwiththetMrheBeselinlshpaoject.to000NCILMEMBER ALLEN�MOVED, MOTION: 515,00E if the Y SECONDED BY COIPROJECT PROCEEDITH INCLUDINGCTION GOINGW HIS HARBOR SQUARE UNDER DAYTON ST., AS PER THE ESTIMATE OF $15.000 (FROM STREET FUNDS), AND TO TALK EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - July 27, 1982 �..,,� �iT.<l:Y,i - .-'r -c: t.- ♦ "h�7 6f 7,' ~-�r.y-.e. •Y ti w u ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 104 LATER. Mayor Harrison said i1e %ad BrOM44i 116'11fto .? + Finance Committee to forego an LID on the street with Harbor Spuare Osyiwg V1W w +� drainage system as designed by Jim Reid, and with the City picking up the entire costs of the street. He said that would leave out the Safeway people because the burden of bringing up and building a sidewalk on their side would be their share. Mr. Beselin said the cost of their system will be $16,000 and by their proposal last week they would be allowing the City to use a portion of the system they will be putting in. He said they are trying to get the City and Safeway to use their system. Also, they are cooperating with Community Transit to provide a curb cut for their buses which are now on Dayton St. and which he felt would help the City, so he felt they were handling a good portion of this. He said he could not address an LID because they are not the property owners. Dr. Robert Barnes said he did not know what his responsibility was at this time because his property was being sold, but the new owners want to build it up to make it consistent with Dayton St. Councilmember Kasper felt Mr. Beselin's offer should be accepted. He still questioned carrying it across the street from the budget, and he said he thought an LID to be in order in light of the magnitude of costs and the property to the north. He said there is a budget problem and even if they spend $65,000-$80,000 in that spot they still do not know where the money will be coming from. In answer to a question, Jeff Ristau said there is $25,000 budgeted in the 112 Fund. Councilmember Allen urged going further with the project, saying that area is really depressed and a lot of people are walking now. Mr. Adams said Mr. Beselin was coming in with his plans and it would have to be determined what the curb line will be as to elevation or there will be a barrier from the street to his property. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Kasper said the Street Fund is limited and he felt the curbs could be put in on the south side at the proper elevation but he thought they should consider an LID on a matching basis, including the City, for a development between SR 104 and the railroad tracks because that is fill property and they do not know when the northerly property will be done. He felt an LID would solve the entire thing. Councilmember Gould said there is $150,000 in the budget, and that they could regulate the amount of risk by determining how far up the hill they go --if they end up $10,000 short they chop it off a block. He had discussed the.project with the Public Works Department and had looked at the street, and he felt it did have to be done, so he thought it best to go forward with the project. Councilmember Hall agreed, saying she also had been to the Public Works Department and had looked at the street many times. Mr. Adams noted that the original item on the agenda was to select a consultant, and he wanted to address the selection of a consultant to do the final design, after which he would be much better able to MOTION: answer the questions of cost. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION BY Failed COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO DESIGNATE $65,000 FOR THE RENOVATION OF DAYTON ST. FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104. The question was asked as to where the funds would come from, and she said from 110 and 112 Funds (which would be spending next year's alloca- tion of 110 money). Councilmember Gould thought everybody's hands would be forced by fixing the street. Councilmember Kasper said he would vote against the motion because he felt the costs were not established and he did not think the street would be built on the money being projected. Councilmember Jaech noted that not too long ago there was a presentation of a sidewalk plan for the City and a number of hearings were held and people wanted to know why they had to pay to put in their sidewalks. She said either way the City will generally tax everybody to put in sidewalks or else everybody would pay for sidewalks in their area. She said this $65,000 will include $19,000 for sidewalks. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HALL AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, NORDQUIST, ALLEN, AND JAECH MOTION: VOTING N0. MOTION FAILED. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO APPOINT THE CONSULTANT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER (REID, MIDDLETON 8 ASSOCIATES), WITH THE BUDGET NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCILMEMBER MOTION: GOULD THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO APPROVE THE STREET PROJECT IN X, THE AMOUIJT OF $46 000 TO PROCEED FROM RAILROAD AVE TO SR 104 WITH FUNDS TO COME Amended FROM APPLICABLE STREET AND GAS TAX MONEY, WITH THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH TO BE PAID FOR BY THE SAFEWAY PROPERTY OWNER AND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY BESELIN (HARBOR SQUARE). COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT IF THE COST ESTIMATES ARE IN EXCESS OF THAT AN LID WILL BE FORMED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN OIJ THE MOTION TO AMEND, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, ALLEN, NORDQUIST, AND JAECH VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS GOULD AND HALL VOTING NO. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, THEN CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - July 27, 1982 tv— , . If • September 209, 10,82 Jim Adams, Engineer City of Edmonds Engineering Dept.' 200 Dayton Edmonds , WA 98020 Dear Jim: • ks'° Per our meeting and discussion with Reid Middleton yesterday, September 28, 10.82, please find enclosed a copy of the upgrade costs to handle Dayton and Safeway drainage. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerel Dick Beselin BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOC. Enclosure t 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 UPGRADE TO HANDLE DAYTON AND SAFEWAY DRAINAGE BASIC.0 system) COMBINED (City) 8" Aluminum Pipe 50 L.F. 349 L.F. 10"It300 L.F. 106 L.F. 12" 1623 L.F. 626 L.F. 15" 412 L.F. 482 L.F. 18" 76 L.F. 385 L.F. 21" 42 L.F. 21" Concrete Pipe - 287 L.F. 24"it- 212 L.F. 2711 If �� _ 230 L.F. 15" Catch Basin 22 L.F. 14 L.F. 16"11 is_ 7 L.F. 48" Man Hole 4 L.F. 6 L.F. 72"11 11_ 1 ADJUSTMENT Add 299 L.F. Delete 194 L:F. Delete 997 L.F. Add 70 L.F. Add 309 L.F. Add 42 L.F. Add 287 L.F. Add 212 L.F. Add 230 L.F. TOTAL COST DIFFERENTIAL $27,014 t Delete 8 Add 7 Add 2 Add 1 .t.ydurirF �.! j�w I rl ( \NC IJI KI /O /{/` ,O/9G,G�,.iT �c•rrcddt�' S1 AI�E () bVA>H{-!W ,'IC)N i vr(ir/�/ �'� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OBice (rf Uistrir_f Ac$nirtiwator • f )-!, 6411 Corson Ave So. ( It i-! tU • �C',u(L l'1',rshtn�rnn )1{ 1!i!i July 29, 1982 Mr. Dick Beselin Beselin/HOVDE Associates 3G0 Ach=al i4ay Suite 204 Edmonds, Washington 98020 SR 104 City of Edmonds Harbor Square Dear Mr. Beselin: ' We have reviewed the plan of your proposed right -turn lane from Dayton Street to SR 104 southbound. The plan (Environmental Impact Statement, Figure 18, Page 53) prdsents serious geometric problems with the twrJe� S right -turn lanes. We would like to meet with your engineer to resolve these problems. Please call Vincent Mentz at 764-4239, when.you are available to meet with us. Thank- you for your patience and please accept our apology for the delay in responding to your request. We look: forward to meting with you. PRL:jew Very truly yours, STRS J.D. ZIRKLE, P.E. District Administrator H.L. MORCAIV, P.E. �. District Design Engineer AIM U=tM_JIL_ Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. September 20, 1982 File No. 02-82-065 8TgFF71 Fi`k1c I I Hovde-Beselin P.O. Box 1043 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Engineers e Surveyors • Planners Subject: Grade of Storm Sewer Main at Harbor Square Dear Sirs: sEP z o 198 :, air o. Z �! b/i� works On Friday, the 17th of September 1982, I was at the project site checking the final computed top elevations of the storm sewer system and found that the storm sewer system between Catch Basin No. 22 and Catch Basin No. 20A was 0.20 feet higher than the storm sewer cut sheets called for. Due to the critical nature of elevation of the storm sewer system, this error has placed the storm sewer above the design elevation of the Dayton Street storm sewer system and adversely affects the construction of same. Our survey crew, which was on - site at that time, checked the inverts and adjacent hubs to verify my determina- tion. Enclosed is a copy of their check of the existing conditions. After checking, I discussed the problem with the City of Edmonds Engineer, the City Hydraulic's Engineer, and RMA staff and we have agreed to the following revision to mitigate the existing conditions. The following corrective measures are to be made to the storm sewer line between Catch Basin No. 22.and Catch Basin No. 20A: 1. Each catch basin is to remain as positioned and at the grade set. 2. The 20-inch concrete storm service line between the above mentioned basins is to be lowered 0.10 foot; adjusting the inverts at Catch Basin No. 22 to 10.27 and the invert at Catch Basin No. 20A to 10.15 matching the outlet of the basin. 3. The tops of each basin will be as indicated on the attached cut sheet. For your information the storm sewer which is to be installed at a later date, to connect the project system to Dayton Street, will be revised to 2 - 15-inch lines. 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-3434 Hovde-Beselin September 20, 1982 File No. 02-82-065 Page 2 Please advise the contractor of this correction as soon as possible, and if additional construction staking will be required, we will be available for staking and will bill the staking and cut sheet preparation separately. If you have any questions please contact our office as soon as possible. Sincerely, REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Allan R. Morgan Associate Engineer ARM:bb Encls. As noted cc: City of Edmonds Engineer City of Edmonds Hydraulic Engineer '00 • Reid, Middleton G Associotes, Inc. Engineers * Surveyors * Planners C U T S H E E T 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200 Edmonds, WoshIngton 98020 L +Z- 040C PROJECT 741ak- L-0, ;::5,v�.Q. JOB, NO. DATE 17 DESCRIPTION 7-,,ra s, SHEET OF ^4J F.B. Sail COMPID OFFSET Aw"O y, It. CKID MANHOLE CURB RET. GUTTER IINL. STATION HUB ELEV. OR EXIST- GRADE -INVERT OR FINISH. ;ARADE CUT FILL.. R IEMARKS C(3 z�zi 13,01 1,3, 74 1 CM *2wil x 2-9 z 1:5. 00 C 130 /9 12-90 13,00 V, e 8 13,00 V/ 6,q 7 q, 50 0091 J 3,00 V -Z, 15- z 00 ez* 13 Z, 77 x- 6-1, /Z. 70 7 (�13 */Z 132"00 0-3/ [ 113 -OfF 13, 0 cs 0 i w 2, 4. N E E N A H FOUNDRY COMPANY Mr. Jerry Hauth September 7,1982 City of -Edmonds Department of Public Works 200 Dayton St. Edmonds , Wa. 98 020 Subject : Harbor Square Inlet Grate substitution Dear Mr. Hauth , Thank you very much for taking the time to discuss the inlet grates for the Harbor Square project friday afternoon . Per our discussion I have submitted a bid to Modern Sewers for an alternate to APWA # 49 . The alternate we discussed was light duty (R3459C) and therefore not appropriate for this application . I therefore submitted a quotation on a nearly identical frame and grate (heavy duty) which I'm sure will be dimensionally acceptable to you based on the criteria we talked about .(R1878-B3G) I very much appreciate your assistance on this project and hope that you will call me with any questions or observations on this or other projects . Sincere ianAeL u. ENSPEC P.O. Box 70293 Seattle , Wa. 98107 ( 206) 28 5-1273 cc: Modern Sewers v • � FILE # ��,5a 64� lu Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors* Planners August 24, 1982 File No. 02-82-065-003 1g�2 puhlic Mr. Jerry Hauth, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Analysis of Effect of 25-Year Storm on Union Oil Marsh With No Outflow Dear Jerry: Pursuant to your request, we have analyzed the effects of a 25-year, 24-hour storm on the Union Oil Marsh. We find that if we assume the worst condition of the tide gate to the marsh being closed, and no water being allowed to release for a 24-hour period, the marsh elevation would only be raised approximately 0.18 feet. The following data were used in determining this: Area of marsh = 24 Acres± Area of basin tributary to marsh = 510 Acres± Peak time to concentration - 60 minutest Intensity at peak time .88 inch/hour 25 year frequency Everett curve Q maximum = 201.96 c.f.s± Total inflow in 24-hour period 71,250 feet3± or 1.63 Ac.ft. The volume of the marsh at low flow = 0 at elevation 8.35 MLLW Volume of marsh with 1.0 foot or elevation 9.35 = 8.8 Ac.ft.- Volume of marsh with 2.0 feet or elevation 10.35 = 16.9 Ac.ft.± Therefore with the total inflow equaling 1.63 Ac.ft., and if we assume no dis- charge, the height of the backwater would only be 0.18 foot, or actually might be less due to the bowl -like shaped marsh. With such a condition not likely to occur, we anticipate only minimal water elevation change within the marsh. In regard to construction of the storm sewer outfalls, we have called the 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Woshington 98020 (206) 775-3434 Mr. Jerry Hauth, P.E. August 24, 1982 File No. 02-82-065-003 Page 2 Washington State Fish and Game Departments and they have expressed concern only for construction of the outlet in the marsh itself. Therefore, outlet construction in the marsh can only occur after the Fish and Game Hydraulics permits have been issued, whereas upland construction need not be held up. Very truly yours, REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Allan R. Morgan Associate Engineer Exhibit 5 STREET FILE That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 42* 34' 34" east 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 42* 34' 34" east 731.18 feet to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of may line south 58* 17' 06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88* 42' 05" east 524.29 feet; thence south 41* 39' 17" east 110.49 feet to the right of way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. NO. 106375); thence south 1* 08' 54" west along said right of way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence south 73* 00' 00" west 240.00 feet; thence north 88* 30' 00" west 110.00 feet; thence north 66* 00' 00" west 140.00 feet; thence north 40* 00' 00" west 125.00 feet; thence north 1* 00' 00" west 200.00 feet; thence north 37* 00' 00" west 26,0.00 feet; thence south 71.* 00' 00" , west 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning; CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT' RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. *Address or viciof Construction 1 dnity t - DAY rn,,.) At • Owner: POA 0 P-1a e N me. Y 0 V- q uaf e- 6 • i�A ailing Address Admi rat ' a I fODT) ..-7CilyQ _gqit. 1te, ip Code • Contractor: 1-1Y��1LR-�J ��9'5T. Na I %B I l? jQ 31-s Mail' Addre m �+ Q ck City, State, Zip Code Permit No 2. Issue Date g 2— • Permit Issued To: 0'kRr, .- Y Type of Work to be Done: S- ,-,1 QA- d Q • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes VNo ?-')-3- 0Z M0-� State License Number 7) y 1-Z�S""0 Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for ins ectio purposes at all times. 3 Q Q Signature: Datey -1 Owner or Agent yt THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: e• � 60CA'-� Time Authorized: Void after 13 to days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee:, 3o + o n Security Deposit: Recei ,,tct Fund I I Wei.` Street Cut Dimensions J X = * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. � Engineers Surveyors 9 Planners August 10, 1982 ESTIMATE FOR BONDING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON DAYTON STREET FOR HARBOR SQUARE DEVELOPMENT 650 l.f. Cement Concrete Sidewalk 7 each Fire Hydrants 3 each Side Sewer Connection 2 each Taps to City Watermain @ $13.00/sq.yd. $ 6,100.00 @ $12.00/each $ 8,400.00 @ $100/each $ 300.00 @ $100/each $ 200.00 $15,000.00 o()1()ED $V of P� fi4000 6,10. gz G 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Washington 98020 (206) 775-3434 found their work essential in her decision making, whether she agreed with them or not. Mr. Phillips asked for an understanding as to procedure when the Council receives the PAB recommendation, and that before the Council changes a finding it be remanded to the PAB. Dave Larson said it would be a great help to the PAB if the Planning Director attended their meetings. He thought they were getting second class treatment by not having the Planning Director there, and he thought the communication between the PAB and the Council would be improved with the presence of the Planning Director at their meetings. He suggested also that if new evidence is presented at a Council meeting that the item be remanded to the PAB to consider that evidence. He also thought that after that happened a few times people would learn. He thought the consolidation of boards into the PAB was a good one, but he asked the Council to trust the PAB as it consists of good, experienced people. He admitted that some of their decisions may not be the same as the Council would make, but he said the Council is elected and makes political decisions, and the PAB is appointive and sits with a different perspective, and when it comes to planning matters they may have a little bit longer range perspective as they are looking at the whole City and those residents who may not be appearing. Valina Walker emphasized that they have felt frustrated and said anything the Council can do to help them define their role in City govern- ment is what they need. Councilmember Allen thought their suggestions could be incorporated into the Council's procedures. She noted that often people appear who say they have to have immediate decisions, and she thought the Council would have to tell them they should have thought about it earlier. Councilmember Gould thought the PAB should provide an independent system wherein people who want to do something in the City have to place that before a nonpolitical body which can say --without having to worry about getting re -elected --this is what you have to do for the benefit of the City. He.said they must find a way to make the people appear before the PAB, possibly even changing the name of the Board to remove the "advisory" terminology. He also thought a list of projects for the PAB should be established. It was noted that the PAB wants the right to pick some of its own projects, in addition to those assigned by the City Council. Mayor Harrison suggested going back to having hearings on the record instead of de novo. Councilmember Gould noted that the intent was to re-examine the de novo aspect after the new system was in effect for a while, and he thought this was probably the time to do so. He also suggested that the PAB join the Council at the retreat when the Council is discussing "Edmonds 1990." He thought the PAB could build its set of goals and that the Council could do the same, and then they could take a Saturday and spend a half -day exchanging the goals and talking between them. Councilmember Allen thought they might do that on a Wednesday evening. Mr. Phillips pursued the suggestion to change the de novo aspect of Council hearings, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka said that would take a Code change and would start with a PAB hearing on the matter. Mayor Harrison said he would discuss with the Planning Director the possibility of her attending the PAB meetings. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT SELECTION - DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS, RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104 City Engineer Jim Adams noted that this item had been expanded to include the Harbor Square proposal made at last week's meeting. He recommended that Reid, Middleton and Associates be the consultant, and Jim Reid was present for the discussion. Mr. Reid answered some of the questions asked at the previous meeting. He said the Harbor Square EIS did address the matter of drainage disposal to the marsh. He indicated on ? `u drawings where the water would be discharged into the marsh and said there will be w ! oil separator devices to protect the marsh. The DOE requires that no water be discharged into the marsh until a permit is obtained, which will take 30 days. Mr. Reid said the drainage system would not cause a major change in the crown of the street. He said it would be 3"- 4", but in places along the curb line it would have to be raised to 1 1/2'. He did not mention alternatives for handling the water flow going down Dayton, saying there are problems there. Regarding the additional engineer- ing costs to the City, he said the total estimate was about $70,000 and $65,000 was already covered. It was noted that the Council had been told it would cost $5,000 - MOTION: $15,000 if the City joined in with Mr. Beselin's project. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO PROCEED WITH MR. BESELIN IN CONJUNCTION WITH HIS HARBOR SQUARE PROJECT AND IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE AT THIS TIME, INCLUDING GOING UNDER DAYTON ST., AS PER THE ESTIMATE OF $15,000 (FROM STREET FUNDS), AND TO TALK EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - July 27, 1982 STREET FILE 0 ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 104 LATER. Mayor Harrison said he had proposed to the Finance Committee to forego an LID on the street with Harbor Square paying for the drainage system as designed by Jim Reid, and with the City picking up the entire costs of the street. He said that would leave out the Safeway people because the burden of bringing up and building a sidewalk on their side would be their share. Mr. Beselin said the cost of their system will be $16,000 and by their proposal last week they would be allowing the City to use a portion of the system they will be putting in. He said they are trying to get the City and Safeway to use their system. Also, they are cooperating with Community Transit to provide a curb cut for their buses which are now on Dayton St. and which he felt would help the City, so he felt they were handling a good portion of this. He said he could not address an LID because they are not the property owners. Dr. Robert Barnes said he did not know what his responsibility was at this time because his property was being sold, but the new owners want to build it up to make it consistent with Dayton St. Councilmember Kasper felt Mr. Beselin's offer should be accepted. He still questioned carrying it across the street from the budget, and he said he thought an LID to be in order in light of the magnitude of costs and the property to the north. He said there is a budget problem and even if they spend $65,000-$80,000 in that spot they still do not know where the money will be coming from. In answer to a question, Jeff Ristau said there is $25,000 budgeted in the 112 Fund. Councilmember Allen urged going further with the project, saying that area is really depressed and a lot of people are walking now. Mr. Adams said Mr. Beselin was coming in with his plans and it would have to be determined what the curb line will be as to elevation or there will be a barrier from the street to his property. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Kasper said the Street Fund is limited and he felt the curbs could be put in on the south side at the proper elevation but he thought they should consider an LID on a matching basis, including the City, for a development between SR 104 and the railroad tracks because that is fill property and they do not know when the northerly property will be done. He felt an LID would solve the entire thing. Councilmember Gould said there is $150,000 in the budget, and that they could regulate the amount of risk by determining how far up the hill they go --if they end up $10,000 short they chop it off a block. He had discussed the project with the Public Works Department and had looked at the street, and he felt it did have to be done, so he thought it best to go forward with the project. Councilmember Hall agreed, saying she also had been to the Public Works Department and had looked at the street many times. Mr. Adams noted that the original item on the agenda was to select a consultant, and he wanted to address the selection of a consultant to do the final design, after which he would be much better able to MOTION: answer the questions of cost. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION BY Failed COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO DESIGNATE $65,000 FOR THE RENOVATION OF DAYTON ST. FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104. The question was asked as to where the funds would come from, and she said from 110 and 112 Funds (which would be spending next year's alloca- tion of 110 money). Councilmember Gould thought everybody's hands would be forced by fixing the street. Councilmember Kasper said he would vote against the motion because he felt the costs were not established and he did not think the street would be built on the money being projected. Councilmember Jaech noted that not too long ago there was a presentation of a sidewalk plan for the City and a number of hearings were held and people wanted to know why they had to pay to put in their sidewalks. She said either way the City will generally tax everybody to put in sidewalks or else everybody would pay for sidewalks in their area. She said this $65,000 will include $19,000 for sidewalks. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HALL AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, NORDQUIST, ALLEN, AND JAECH MOTION: VOTING NO. MOTION FAILED. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO APPOINT THE CONSULTANT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER (REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES), WITH THE BUDGET NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCILMEMBER MOTION: GOULD THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO APPROVE THE STREET PROJECT IN Amended THE AMOUNT OF $46,000, TO PROCEED FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104, WITH FUNDS TO COME FROM APPLICABLE STREET AND GAS TAX MONEY, WITH THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH TO BE PAID FOR BY THE SAFEWAY PROPERTY OWNER AND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY BESELIN (HARBOR SQUARE). COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT IF THE COST ESTIMATES ARE IN EXCESS OF THAT AN LID WILL BE FORMED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, ALLEN, NORDQUIST, AND, JAECH VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS GOULD AND HALL VOTING NO. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, THEN CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - July 27, 1982 ,I • THESE JTV TES SUBJECT TO JULY 27 APPROVAL R EC ENV E D JUL 2 31982 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING Dir. Of Public Works July 20, 1982 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Harve Harrison in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Harve Harrison, Mayor Jim Adams, City Engineer Bill Kasper Jack Mitchell, Public Works Superintendent Laura Hall Mary Lou Block, Planning Director Jo -Anne Jaech Jeff Ristau, Accountant Ray Gould Dan Prinz, Police Chief Larry Naughten Jack Weinz, Fire Chief John Nordquist Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Katherine Allen Mark Eames, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk CONSENT AGENDA Items (B) and (D) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, MOTION: SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following: (A) Roll call. (C) Acknowledgment of receipt of Claim for Damages from Mrs. Beulah Rierson in the amount of $3,000. (E) Mid -year financial status report. (F) Authorization for informal sale of Unit 29 (1969 Dodge Dart). APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1982 [Item (B) on Consent Agenda] Councilmember Hall noted that on page 6 of the Minutes, the third paragraph, it was she who had been contacted by Peggy Harris, rather than Councilmember Allen. COUNCIL - MEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 13, MOTION: 1982 WITH THAT CORRECTION, APPROVING ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN UNION OIL/CITY OF EDMONDS BEACH LEASE Item D on Consent AgenTa7 Councilmember Allen had no problem with this but she thought this would be a good time to ask publicly about the parking situation there, i.e., when will the additional parking be provided. Since no representative of the Parks and Recreation Department was present, Councilmember Allen asked for a report next week as to the timing (not to be an agenda item). Robert Woehrmann of the Union Oil Company was asked his opinion of the City's development of the beach, and he responded that a fine job of MOTION: landscaping had been done. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE ITEM (D) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Harrison thanked the Union Oil representatives on behalf of the City for leasing the beach to the City for only $300 per year. It is a five-year lease. AUDIENCE Dick Beselin of the Harbor Square Associates discussed a proposal for a joint venture Q•°�(•°��Z with the City for storm sewer relief on Dayton St. from SR 104 to the railroad tracks. Mr. Beselin said Harbor Square Associates already had submitted to the Engineering _I Department a storm sewer system to handle the drainage requirements for Harbor Square `i �anA- but that submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent Dayton St. and Safeway lot drainage. An alternate plan would provide for future requirements to handle water from Dayton St. and Safeway, but additional engineering and oversizing STPEET FILE of the present system would be required. The estimate for the additional costs was $6,000, and Mr. Beselin said future cost to provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 (going across the Harbor Square property to the marsh to release the water). He said Harbor Square had nothing to gain by this proposal, and they were submitting it in the spirit of cooperation. The conditions of their proposal were that the City agree to the additional cost of engineering; the City agree to additional cost of construction over their proposed system currently submitted; and that the maintenance of that portion of the system where a tie-in is involved be accomplished by the City. They required an immediate response because they were ready to commence construction. City Engineer Jim Adams said the elevation of a portion of Dayton St. and the Safeway parking lot will have to be raised 18" or more to get rid of the water, and with this proposal it gives the City the opportunity to take care of this problem --which is not a Port or Harbor Square problem. He said if the City waits to do it in the future it will not only have to tear up the area but will have to do it all at City cost. Dr. Barnes, owner of the Safeway property, felt he had been caught in the middle. He said for the last several years he had been frustrated in trying to correct the problem and it is impossible for him to do so without the City's cooperation. He said the water goes down Dayton and backs up on his property and has buckled the sidewalk, and the north side of Dayton is lower than the south side. He thought this proposal to be a partial solution to the problem, and said he intends to get the problem fixed this year as he has had threats that Safeway may move. Councilmember Kasper said this had to go to the Finance Committee and an answer could be given next MOTION: week. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO EXPAND THE JULY &�rg 9-4,,27 CONSULTANT SELECTION DISCUSSION RELATING TO THE DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS TO INCORPORATE THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPOSAL, AND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE FURNISHED TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW THEM TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS. STAFF IS TO LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE DRAWINGS ON THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPERTY AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS THE NECESSARY FEATURES TO PROTECT THE MARSH FROM POLLUTANTS; CHECK TO SEE IF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAN BE INSTALLED TO HANDLE THE WATER WITHOUT MAJOR STREET REBUILD; REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO HANDLE WATER COMING DOWN DAYTON ST; AND ESTABLISH COSTS TO THE CITY FOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Beselin said they could not wait as they have to start by August 1 and if they wait for the Council's answer next week that would not allow time for the new engineering to be accomplished and be approved by the City. It was finally agreed that the City would hire Reid -Middleton to prepare an alternate plan to handle the City's problems and both plans will be available for next weeks's meeting. Roy LaRue of the Edmonds Softball Association said the lights at the Edmonds High School football field are being changed and the School District is willing to sell the old poles and standards for $1,200 and the lights for $7.50 each (8 poles with 12 lights to a pole) and he asked that the City buy them for the softball field at the junior high playfield. His association was willing to contribute $500 towards the cost and he said the School District was willing to accept street sweeping for payment. He said they would put a timer on the lights so they would be turned off at 11:00 p.m., using them from 8:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. He was aware of the neighborhood controversy about the lighted soccer field and said these lights are not high intensity lights. Councilmember Kasper agreed that they are not high intensity, noting that the City tried to buy them previously but the School District was not ready to sell them at MOTION: that time. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO Amended AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT TO MAKE THE PURCHASE FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND, NOT ACCEPTING THE $500 FROM THE EDMONDS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION. It was determined that the funds were not available in the Council Contingency Fund. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST AMENDED HIS MOTION, ACCEPTABLE TO THE SECOND, TO TAKE THE FUNDS FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION FUND. Councilmember Gould asked if these actually are lights the City will use, saying he would prefer that this be set as an agenda item to give the Staff an opportunity to indicate if they really want them. Council - member Nordquist responded that this issue has been hanging and Jim Jessel had indicated to him that this would be a good acquisition. It was noted that there is an hourly rate established for street sweeping and that something may be worked out for a trade. Councilmember Nordquist asked that the Parks and Recreation Director make a recommendation as to the use of the poles. It was felt there should be a hearing to give people an opportunity to speak on this, especially the neighbors of MOTION: the playfield. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT THE STAFF PROVIDE INPUT ON AUGUST 3, 1982 AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD ON AUGUST 17, 1982. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - July 20, 1982 rbo, Flisqu'are L I � .July 20, 1982 y TO: City Council Al FROM: Harbor Square Associates � SUBJECT: Joint Venture for Storm Sewer Relief on Dayton Street from SR 104 to Burlington Northern Tracks Harbor Square Associates presently has submitted, to the City of Edmond's Engineering Department, a storm sewer system to handle drainage require- ments f&, Harbor Square, comprising of approximately 10.9 acres. This submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent.Dayton Street and Safeway; lot drainage. An alternate plan, at this time, would provide for future requirements to handle:volumes of water from Dayton Street and Safeway. Considerable savings could be realized by the City of Edmonds as determined by the City Engineering Department and our engineers, Reid Middleton & Associates. Such possible cost expenditure ,,roul,d involve the engineering and oversizing of present system by Harbor Square Associates to handle future drainage needs from the adjacent Dayton Street and Safeway parking lot. It is estimated that such cost at this time would amount to approximately $6,000. The estimated future cost to provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 or a potential savings of $19,000. The reason for this proposal, at this time, is that Harbor Square Associates has been under the impression for several months that improvements to Dayton Street were to be completed this summer and would possibly be concurrent with the construction,of utilities for Harbor Square. We have been advised in the last week that improvements to Dayton Street will not commence at this time and are delayed indefinitely. There is no apparent advantage to Harbor Square as a result of this proposal. The.Engineering Department recognizes the potential of this proposal and, in the spirit of cooperation, we wish to submit it accordingly. �i Harbor Square Associ•s • duly 20, 1982 Page 2 If' accepted by the City Council, we ask only that the following conditions" apply: M 1. The.City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of engineering. 2. The City of Edmonds agrees to additional cost of construction over our proposed system as presently submitted. 3. The maintenance ofthat portion of system,, where a tie-in is involved, be maintained by the City of Edmonds. In order.to take advantage of weather, time is of the essence as we expect to begin construction upon approval of engineering plans by July 30, 1982. Should the City Council not act on this proposal at this time, we will proceed accordingly with already submitted plans. J • reed with them or her decision making, whether a9 With the V. found their work essential in h as to procedure when the Council not. Mr. Phillips asked for an uand that be to the PAB if the receives the PAB recommendation, and that before the Coeatihelpanges a finding it be remanded to the PAB. Dave Larson said 9s would be thought they were getting second class Planning Director attended their meetings. He thong thoughtth the presen of the Planning on treatment by not having the Planning Director there, and he thought the he Planning between the PAB and the Council would He suggestedialsoved that if new evidence is presented He a Director at their meetings. happened a few times people would learn. He thought the Council meeting that the item be remanded to the PAB to consider that evidence. also thought that after that tim one, but he asked the Council to consolidation of boards into the PAB was a g 1 He admitted that some of trust the PAB as it consists Of good, experienced peop e. their decisions may not be the same as the Council would make, but he said the Council matters they may have a little is elected and makes political whendeticomes�tonplanningd the 6 is appointive and sits with a different perspective, and those residents bit longer range perspectivValinahWalker emphasey are ized thattheyhave felt frusLrat ed who may not be appearing. to help them define their role in City govern- overn- and said anything the Council can do ment is what they need. 1 ear who say they have ated into the Council s Councilmember Allen thought their suggestions could be incorporto have immediate procedures. She noted that often people would have to ll hem they ould decisions,outdithearlier. Counci the Cuncil lmemberGouldthought the tPAB should hprovide van thought to do independent system wherein itical peobodyle who cantsay--withouthhaving toing in eCity have iplace worry about getting that before re -elected --this is what you have to dearor the bthefPA6,fpossiblythe yeven echanging said ethe must find a way to make the people appear He also thought a list of name of the Board to remove the "advisory" terminology.te projects for the PAB should be es. is ,hin additionnoteded. It was nts tothoseat the B assignedbyathe City right to pick some of its own projects, having hearings on the record Council. Mayor Harrison suggested going back to h was to instead of de nonmrfiber Gould was innoted thafora whilet and he thoughtine thishe de novo aspect after the new was probably the time to do so. He also suggested that the PAB join the a PAB a the retreat when the Council is discussinthe g Edmocoulnds 1 990the same, anduthenttheyAcouldld build its set o g goals and talking between them. take a Saturday and spend a half -day exchanging the Councilmember Allen thought ,they might do that on a Wednesday evening. flan Phillips pursued the suggestion to change the de novo aspect of Council hearings, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka said that would take a Code change and would start with a PAB hearing on the matter. Mayor Harrison said he would discuss with the Planning Director h — ss_• ' 'ty.of her attending the PAB meetings. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT SELECTION - DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS RAILROAD A 04 City Engineer Jim Adams noted that this item had been expanded to include the Harbor Square proposal made consut last ltant,wand1Jim Reid9wasHpresent forethehdiscussi dat Reid, iscussion. Mr. Reid d Associates be He said the Harbor answered some of the questions asked at the previous meeting. Square EIS did address the matter dischargedeintopthelmarshto handasaid therenwilltbe on drawings where the ttr oil separator devices the to protictathe ermirsh. obtained, require latake 30tdayse discharged Reid said Hehsadidaitage wouldsbem3wou4",nbutcinsplacesJalongathe curb hlineoit wouldof have street. r flow to be raised to 1 1/2'. He did not tathere. Regardingathe�additeonalng theengineer- going down Dayton, saying there are problems ing costs to the City, he said the total estimate was about $70,000 and cost $5 was already covered. It was noted that a tMtheBCouncil had b een told it would cost $5,000 -' th"NCB? kW Mt)1 ION: $15 , 000 i 4 e `i":Y..�uecn unanni i1 S :tP.RO>r TH .,M B.15., m►; �n 'urn rn`i;NG EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL t•11NUTES Page 3 - July 27, 1982 f -{F" ..rug #TA R4�Py� 7�wIi ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 104 LATER. Mayor HsrrisontAiala Finance Committee to forego an LID on the street with Harbor Souaro' nq�f8r;bgj drainage system as designed by Jim Reid, and with the City picking up tM Mtlro+`,:1; costs of the street. He said that would leave out the Safeway people because tho :;`.' IV burden of bringing up and building a sidewalk on their side would be their share. Mr. Beselin said the cost offtheir system will be $16,000 and by their proposal last week they would be allowing the City to use a portion of the system they will be putting in. He said they are trying to get the City and Safeway to use their system. Also, they are cooperating with Community Transit to provide a curb cut for their buses which are now on Dayton St. and which he felt would help the City, so he felt they were handling a good portion of this. He said he could not address an LID because they are not the property owners. Dr. Robert Barnes said he did not know what his responsibility was at this time because his property was being sold, but the new owners want to build it up to make it consistent with Dayton St. Councilmember Kasper felt Mr. Beselin's offer should be accepted. He still questioned carrying it across the street from the budget, and he said he thought an LID to be in order in light of the magnitude of costs and the property to the north. He said there is a budget problem and even if they spend $65,000-$80,000 in that spot they still do not know where the money will be coming from. In answer to a question, Jeff Ristau said there is $25,000 budgeted in the 112 Fund. Councilmember Allen urged going further with the project, saying that area is really depressed and a lot of people are walking now. Mr. Adams said Mr. Beselin was coming in with his plans and it would have to be determined what the curb line will be as to elevation or there will be a barrier from the street to his property. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Kasper said the Street Fund is limited and he felt the curbs could be put in on the south side at the proper elevation but he thought they should consider an LID on a matching basis, including the City, for a development between SR 104 and the railroad tracks because that is fill property and they do not know when the northerly property will be done. He felt an LID would solve the entire thing. Councilmember Gould said there is $150,000 in the budget, and that they could regulate the amount of risk by determining how far up the hill they go --if they end up $10,000 short they chop it off a block. He had discussed the.project with the Public Works Department and had looked at the street, and he felt it did have to be done, so he :thought it best to go forward with the project. Councilmember Hall agreed, saying she also had been to the Public Works Department and had looked at the street many times. Mr. Adams noted that the original item on the agenda was to select a consultant, and he wanted to address the selection of a consultant to do the final design, after which he would be much better able to MOTION: answer -the questions of cost. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION BY Failed COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO DESIGNATE $65,000 FOR THE RENOVATION OF DAYTON ST. FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104. The question was asked as to where the funds would come from, and she said from 110 and 112 Funds (which would be spending next year's alloca- tion of 110 money). Councilmember Gould thought everybody's hands would be forced by fixing the street. Councilmember Kasper said he would vote against the motion because he felt the costs were not established and he did not think the street would be built on the money being projected. Councilmember Jaech noted that not too long ago there was a presentation of a sidewalk plan for the City and a number of hearings were held and people wanted to know why they had to pay to put in their sidewalks. She said either way the City will generally tax everybody to put in sidewalks or else everybody would pay for sidewalks in their area. She said this $65,000 will include $19,000 for sidewalks. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HALL AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH S KASPER N LEN AND JAECH MOTION: VOTING NO. MOTION FAILED. 0 MEMBER_ICASR R TtHE tlOVEQ.�._ "ECDI>iDED Bi 'LYfiE ' MOTION: i930THN MIV OVO,�LIOY;'C;O�1�NC;ILME�!*BERFLI. 0 P•P VE S �'�ET �PRO�,}'E IN Amended RO P R Bl'E'aSTREE� ANDPGASETAX MONEY, WiTHDTHE SIDEW$ALKIONTHETNORTHDTO BE PAID -- FOR BY THE SAFEWAY PROPERTY OWNER AND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY BESELIN (HARBOR SQUARE). COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT IF THE COST ESTIMATES ARE IN EXCESS OF THAT AN LID WILL BE FORMED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, ALLEN, NORDQUIST, AND JAECH VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS GOULD AND HALL VOTING NO. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, THEN CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Pa9e 4 - July 27, 1982 .__ _ .. , " _.__. .. _ a ,riU01+ti. 5...+ ,• .. _. .. - .. .. ...... Yt.`".P:�fyC.FM!%P..?.f�„4'u4^.L'."`"y_.:`%7`TS,GNA _J :`.Hif =+..t:.. re.'P 3. "rt?T^. 1*: cr!^•. .w,..�M wwn... .............-........ n...+w+.u..s.awe.w.n... REG�v�f-ID D1t 0{P�bllcwcrks September 29, 10,82 • Jim Adams, Engineer City of Edmonds Engineering Dept .- , 200 Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Jim: Per our meeting and discussion with Reid Middleton yesterday, September 28, 1982, please find enclosed a copy of the upgrade costs to handle Dayton and Safeway drainage. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. - S .ncerel Dick Beselin BESELIN/HOVDE ASSOC. DB:sb Enclosure M 300 Admiral Way, Suite 204, Edmorrds, Washington 98020 (206) 774-8993 UPGRADE TO HANDLE DAYTON AND SAFEWAY DRAINAGE BASIC. (4 system) COMBINED (City) 8" Aluminum Pipe 50 L.F: 349 L.F. 10" to If 300 L.F. 106 -L.F.. 3 12" " ." 1623 L.F. 626 L.F. 15" 412 L.F. 482 L.F. 18" If76 L.F. : 385 L.F. 21"11 11- . 42 L.F. 21" Concrete Pipe - 287 L.F. 24" - 212 L.F. 27" of " - 230 L.F. 15" Catch Basin 22 L.F. 14 L.F. 1611 11 11 _ 7 L.F. 48" Man Hole 4 L.F. 6 L.F. 72" of it - 1 TOTAL COST DIFFERENTIAL $27,014 ADJUSTMENT ...: Add.- 299 L:F.' Delete 194 L:F. Delete 997 L.F. Add 70 L.F. Add 309 L.F. Add 42 L.F. Add 287 L.F. Add 212 L.F. Add 230 L.F. Delete 8 Add 7 Add 2 Add 1 THESE M M TES SUBJECT TO JULY 27 APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 20, 1982 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Harve Harrison in the Council Chambers.of the Edmonds Civic Center. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Harve Harrison, Mayor Jim Adams, City Engineer Bill Kasper Jack Mitchell, Public Works Superintendent Laura Hall Mary Lou Block, Planning Director Jo -Anne Jaech Jeff Ristau, Accountant Ray Gould Dan Prinz, Police Chief Larry Naughten Jack Weinz, Fire Chief John Nordquist Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Katherine Allen Mark Eames, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk CONSENT AGENDA Items (B) and (D) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, MOTION: SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda included the following: (A) Roll call. (C) Acknowledgment of receipt of Claim for Damages from Mrs. Beulah Rierson in the amount of $3,000. (E) Mid -year financial status report. (F) Authorization for informal sale of Unit 29 (1969 Dodge Dart). APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1982 [Item (B) on Consent Agenda] Councilmember Hall noted that on page 6 of the Minutes, the third paragraph, it was she who had been contacted by Peggy Harris, rather than Councilmember Allen. COUNCIL - MEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 13, MTrION: 1982 WITH THAT CORRECTION, APPROVING ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN UNION OIL/CITY OF EDMONDS BEACH LEASE LItem D on Consent AgenTa7 Councilmember Allen had no problem with this but she thought this would be a good time to ask publicly about the parking situation there, i.e., when will the additional parking be provided. Since no representative of the Parks and Recreation Department was present, Councilmember Allen asked for a report next week as to the timing (not to be an agenda item). Robert Woehrmann of the Union Oil Company was asked his opinion of the City's development of the beach, and he responded that a fine job of MOTION: landscaping had been done. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO APPROVE ITEM (D) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Harrison thanked the Union Oil representatives on behalf of the City for leasing the beach to the City for only $300 per year. It is a five-year lease. AUDIENCE Dick Beselin of the Harbor Square Associates discussed a proposal for a joint venture with the City for storm sewer relief on Dayton St. from SR 104 to the railroad tracks. Mr. Beselin said Harbor Square Associates already had submitted to the Engineering Department a storm sewer system to handle the drainage requirements for Harbor Square but that submittal does not provide for possible future tie-in of adjacent Dayton St. and Safeway lot drainage. An alternate plan would provide for future requirements to handle water from Dayton St. and Safeway, but additional engineering and oversizing STREET FILE of the present system would be required. The estimate for the additional costs was $6,000, and Mr. Beselin said future cost to provide for such drainage could exceed $25,000 (going across the Harbor Square property to the marsh to release the water). He said Harbor Square had nothing to gain by this proposal, and they were submitting it in the spirit of cooperation. The conditions of their proposal were that the City agree to the additional cost of engineering; the City agree to additional cost of construction over their proposed system currently submitted; and that the maintenance of that portion of the system where a tie-in is involved be accomplished by the City. They required an immediate response because they were ready to commence construction. City Engineer Jim Adams said the elevation of a portion of Dayton St. and the Safeway parking lot will have to be raised 18" or more to get rid of the water, and with this proposal it gives the City the opportunity to take care of this problem --which is not a Port or Harbor Square problem. He said if the City waits to do it in the future it will not only have to tear up the area but will have to do it all at City cost. Dr. Barnes, owner of the Safeway property, felt he had been caught in the middle. He said for the last several years he had been frustrated in trying to correct the problem and it is impossible for him to do so without the City's cooperation. He said the water goes down Dayton and backs up on his property and has buckled the sidewalk, and the north side of Dayton is lower than the south side. He thought this proposal to be a partial solution to the problem, and said he intends to get the problem fixed this year as he has had threats that Safeway may move. Councilmember Kasper said this had to go to the Finance Committee and an answer could be given next MOTION: week. COUNCILMEMBER GOULD MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO EXPAND THE JULY 27 CONSULTANT SELECTION DISCUSSION RELATING TO THE DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS TO INCORPORATE THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPOSAL, AND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE FURNISHED TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW THEM TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS. STAFF IS TO LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE DRAWINGS ON THE HARBOR SQUARE PROPERTY AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM HAS THE NECESSARY FEATURES TO PROTECT THE MARSH FROM POLLUTANTS; CHECK TO SEE IF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAN BE INSTALLED TO HANDLE THE WATER WITHOUT MAJOR STREET REBUILD; REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO HANDLE WATER COMING DOWN DAYTON ST; AND ESTABLISH COSTS TO THE CITY FOR ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Beselin said they could not wait as they have to start by August 1 and if they wait for the Council's answer next week that would not allow time for the new engineering to be accomplished and be approved by the City. It was finally agreed that the City would hire Reid -Middleton to prepare an alternate plan to handle the City's problems and both plans will be available for next weeks's meeting. Roy LaRue of the Edmonds Softball Association said the lights at the Edmonds High School football field are being changed and the School District is willing to sell the old poles and standards for $1,200 and the lights for $7.50 each (8 poles with 12 lights to a pole) and he asked that the City buy them for the softball field at the junior high playfield. His association was willing to contribute $500 towards the cost and he said the School District was willing to accept street sweeping for payment. He said they would put a timer on the lights so they would be turned off at 11:00 p.m., using them from 8:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. He was aware of the neighborhood controversy about the lighted soccer field and said these lights are not high intensity lights. Councilmember Kasper agreed that they are not high intensity, noting that the City tried to buy them previously but the School District was not ready to sell them at MOTION: that time. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO Amended AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT TO MAKE THE PURCHASE FROM THE COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUND, NOT ACCEPTING THE $500 FROM THE EDMONDS SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION. It was determined that the funds were not available in the Council Contingency Fund. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST AMENDED HIS MOTION, ACCEPTABLE TO THE SECOND, TO TAKE THE FUNDS FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION FUND. Councilmember Gould asked if these actually are lights the City will use, saying he would prefer that this be set as an agenda item to give the Staff an opportunity to indicate if they really want them. Council - member Nordquist responded that this issue has been hanging and Jim Jessel had indicated to him that this would be a good acquisition. It was noted that there is an hourly rate established for street sweeping and that something may be worked out for a trade. Councilmember Nordquist asked that the Parks and Recreation Director make a recommendation as to the use of the poles. It was felt there should be a hearing to give people an opportunity to speak on this, especially the neighbors of MOTION: the playfield. COUNCILMEMBER NAUGHTEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT THE STAFF PROVIDE INPUT ON AUGUST 3, 1982 AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE HELD ON AUGUST 17, 1982. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - July 20, 1982 found their work essential in her decision making, whether she agreed with them or not. Mr. Phillips asked for an understanding as to procedure when the Council receives the PAB recommendation, and that before the Council changes a finding it be remanded to the PAB. Dave Larson said it would be a great help to the PAB if the Planning Director attended their meetings. He thought they were getting second class treatment by not having the Planning Director there, and he thought the communication between the PAB and the Council would be improved with the presence of the Planning Director at their meetings. He suggested also that if new evidence is presented at a Council meeting that the item be remanded to the PAB to consider that evidence. He also thought that after that happened a few times people would learn. He thought the consolidation of boards into the PAB was a good one, but he asked the Council to trust the PAB as it consists of good, experienced people. He admitted that some of their decisions may not be the same as the Council would make, but he said the Council is elected and makes political decisions, and the PAB is appointive and sits with a different perspective, and when it comes to planning matters they may have a little bit longer range perspective as they are looking at the whole City and those residents who may not be appearing. Valina Walker emphasized that they have felt frustrated and said anything the Council can do to help them define their role in City govern- ment is what they need. Councilmember Allen thought their suggestions could be incorporated into the Council's procedures. She noted that often people appear who say they have to have immediate decisions, and she thought the Council would have to tell them they should have thought about it earlier. Councilmember Gould thought the PAB should provide an independent system wherein people who want to do something in the City have to place that before a nonpolitical body which can say --without having to worry about getting re -elected --this is what you have to do for the benefit of the City. He said they must find a way to make the people appear before the PAB, possibly even changing the name of the Board to remove the "advisory" terminology. He also thought a list of projects for the PAB should be established. It was noted that the PAB wants the right to pick some of its own projects, in addition to those assigned by the City Council. Mayor Harrison suggested going back to having hearings on the record instead of de novo. Councilmember Gould noted that the intent was to re-examine the de novo aspect after the new system was in effect for a while, and he thought this was probably the time to do so. He also suggested that the PAB join the Council at the retreat when the Council is discussing "Edmonds 1990." He thought the PAB could build its set of goals and that the Council could do the same, and then they could take a Saturday and spend a half -day exchanging the goals and talking between them. Councilmember Allen thought they might do that on a Wednesday evening. Mr. Phillips pursued the suggestion to change the de novo aspect of Council hearings, and City Attorney Wayne Tanaka said that would take a Code change and would start with a PAB hearing on the matter. Mayor Harrison said he would discuss with the Planning Director the possibility of her attending the PAB meetings. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT SELECTION - DAYTON ST. IMPROVEMENTS, RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104 City Engineer Jim Adams noted that this item had been expanded to include the Harbor Square proposal made at last week's meeting. He recommended that Reid, Middleton and Associates be the consultant, and Jim Reid was present for the discussion. Mr. Reid answered some of the questions asked at the previous meeting. He said the Harbor Square EIS did address the matter of drainage disposal to the marsh. He indicated on drawings where the water would be discharged into the marsh and said there will be oil separator devices to protect the marsh. The DOE requires that no water be discharged into the marsh until a permit is obtained, which will take 30 days. Mr. Reid said the drainage system would not cause a major change in the crown of the street. He said it would be 3"- 4", but in places along the curb line it would have to be raised to 1 112'. He did not mention alternatives for handling the water flow going down Dayton, saying there are problems there. Regarding the additional engineer- ing costs to the City, he said the total estimate was about $70,000 and $65,000 was already covered. It was noted that the Council had been told it would cost $5,000 - MOTION: $15,000 if the City joined in with Mr. Beselin's project. COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO PROCEED WITH MR. BESELIN IN CONJUNCTION WITH HIS HARBOR SQUARE PROJECT AND IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE AT THIS TIME, INCLUDING GOING UNDER DAYTON ST., AS PER THE ESTIMATE OF $15,000 (FROM STREET FUNDS), AND TO TALK EDMONDS CIT�' .COI�NCIL MINUTES ��, k FILE Page 3 - JLu�7_,�)1982 % ft ki ABOUT IMPROVEMENTS TO SR 104 LATER. Mayor Harrison said he had proposed to the Finance Committee to forego an LID on the street with Harbor Square paying for the drainage system as designed by Jim Reid, and with the City picking up the entire costs of the street. He said that would leave out the Safeway people because the burden of bringing up and building a sidewalk on their side would be their share. Mr. Beselin said the cost of their system will be $16,000 and by their proposal last week they would be allowing the City to use a portion of the system they will be putting in. He said they are trying to get the City and Safeway to use their system. Also, they are cooperating with Community Transit to provide a curb cut for their buses which are now on Dayton St. and which he felt would help the City, so he felt they were handling a good portion of this. He said he could not address an LID because they are not the property owners. Dr. Robert Barnes said he did not know what his responsibility was at this time because his property was being sold, but the new owners want to build it up to make it consistent with Dayton St. Councilmember Kasper felt Mr. Beselin's offer should be accepted. He still questioned carrying it across the street from the budget, and he said he thought an LID to be in order in light of the magnitude of costs and the property to the north. He said there is a budget problem and even if they spend $65,000-$80,000 in that spot they still do not know where the money will be coming from. In answer to a question, Jeff Ristau said there is $25,000 budgeted in the 112 Fund. Councilmember Allen urged going further with the project, saying that area is really depressed and a lot of people are walking now. Mr. Adams said Mr. Beselin was coming in with his plans and it would have to be determined what the curb line will be as to elevation or there will be a barrier from the street to his property. THE MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Kasper said the Street Fund is limited and he felt the curbs could be put in on the south side at the proper elevation but he thought they should consider an LID on a matching basis, including the City, for a development between SR 104 and the railroad tracks because that is fill property and they do not know when the northerly property will be done. He felt an LID would solve the entire thing. Councilmember Gould said there is $150,000 in the budget, and that they could regulate the amount of risk by determining how far up the hill they go --if they end up $10,000 short they chop it off a block. He had discussed the project with the Public Works Department and had looked at the street, and he felt it did have to be done, so he thought it best to go forward with the project. Councilmember Hall agreed, saying she also had been to the Public Works Department and had looked at the street many times. Mr. Adams noted that the original item on the agenda was to select a consultant, and he wanted to address the selection of a consultant to do the final design, after which he would be much better able to MOTION: answer the questions of cost. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED FOR DISCUSSION BY Failed COUNCILMEMBER GOULD, TO DESIGNATE $65,000 FOR THE RENOVATIO14 OF DAYTON ST. FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104. The question was asked as to where the funds would come from, and she said from 110 and 112 Funds (which would be spending next year's alloca- tion of 110 money). Councilmember Gould thought everybody's hands would be forced by fixing the street. Councilmember Kasper said he would vote against the motion because he felt the costs were not established and he did not think the street would be built on the money being projected. Councilmember Jaech noted that not too long ago there was a presentation of a sidewalk plan for the City and a number of hearings were held and people wanted to know why they had to pay to put in their sidewalks. She said either way the City will generally tax everybody to put in sidewalks or else everybody would pay for sidewalks in their area. She said this $65,000 will include $19,000 for sidewalks. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS HALL AND GOULD VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, NORDQUIST, ALLEN, AND JAECH MOTION: VOTING NO. MOTION FAILED. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, TO APPOINT THE CONSULTANT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER (REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES), WITH THE BUDGET NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCILMEMBER MOTION: GOULD THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO APPROVE THE STREET PROJECT IN Amended THE AMOUNT OF $46,000, TO PROCEED FROM RAILROAD AVE. TO SR 104, WITH FUNDS TO COME FROM APPLICABLE STREET AND GAS TAX MONEY, WITH THE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH TO BE PAID FOR BY THE SAFEWAY PROPERTY OWNER AND ON THE OTHER SIDE BY BESELIN (HARBOR SQUARE). COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ALLEN, THAT IF THE COST ESTIMATES ARE IN EXCESS OF THAT AN LID WILL BE FORMED. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO AMEND, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS KASPER, ALLEN, NORDQUIST, AND JAECH VOTING YES, AND WITH COUNCILMEMBERS GOULD AND HALL VOTING NO. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, THEN CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - July 27, 1982 GG�I LE,�dilt�DAGe�Td� ,W/ le*,f Y 0 f 11 F• . . rn.1. +Wp'Sw INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS ,BATS ' June 17 19 82 TO 'FROM planning Department DAN SMITH, PLAN/ENG INSPECT ASR FORM 141 SUBJECT: ADB-28-82/HARBOR SQUARE ASSOCIATES = JULY 7, 1982 MEETING Please review attached item and return your comments to Hank Lewis. Thank you. STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD • DATE 6-16FILE 416tA_ z8 -8 Z SITE PLAN BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS / LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RECEIPT # SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT # PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE HARBOR SQUARE ASSOCIATES HEARING DATE PHONE 774-8993 ADDRESS 300 Admiral Way, Edmonds ZIP CODE 98020 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Warren LaFon , Architect PHONE 774-0580 PROPERTY ADDRESS 100 Dayton Ave. - #9 ZONING CG LEGAL DESCRIPTION See attaehed PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1. Building Plans - Preliminary Final X Site Plan X Landscape Plan 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Office / Warehouse APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT 1982 ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK Elevations X RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The mission for public officials and the staff property for the purpose of inspection and undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per - of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject posting attendant to this application. (Signature of Applicant) for HARBOR SQUARE ASSOCIATES 01 REVISED SEPTEMBER 4, 1981 April 6, 1981 File No. 3.84 Port of Edmonds HARBOR SQUARE LEASE DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 Reid, Middleton & TL(f � r D()- - - - Associcatoos, Inc. Engineers - Surveyors - Planners That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right -of" way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way N42"34'34"E, 616.37 feet, thence N71000'00"E, 401.09 feet; thence S37000'00"E, 260.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N469 7'S4"E, 70.00 feet; thence S43°42'06"E, 120.00 feet; thence S88'42'06"E, 422.56 feet to the westerly right-of-way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. No. 106375); thence SI'08'54"H along said westerly right-of-way a distance of 237.46 feet,; thence S73°00'00"I•I, 240.00 feet; thence N88030'00"W,'110.00 feet; thence N66000'00"W, 140.00 feet; thence N40°00'00-W, 125.00 feet; thence N1°00'00"W, 200.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in Snohomish County, Washington. The above described parcel contains 3.636 Acres, more or less PARCEL 2. That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the Intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right--of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way N42°34'34"E, 616.37 feet-, to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N42°34'34"E, 731.18 feet to the southerly right-of-way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line S58°17'06"E, 12.54 feet; thence S88042'06"E, 524.29 feet; thence 541039117"E, 110.49 feet to the westerly right-of-way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. No. 106375); thence Sl°08'54"H along said westerly right.of-way a distance of 562.54 feet; thence N88"42'06"W. 422.56 feet; thence N43°42'05"W, 120.00 feet; thence S46017'54"W, 70.00 feet:; thence N37°00'00"W, 260.00 feet; thence S71000'00"W, 401.09 feet: to the true point of beginning. Situate in Snohomish County, Washington The above described parcel contains 10.983 Acres, more or less Memo to ADB.Members Page 2 - May 27, 1982 ADB-23-82 PAUL ROYy'` No comment. ADB-24-82 MAD ANTHONY'S The circulation system, as exists, is adequate. Any new landscaping or berms shall not impede safe sight distance for, -.vehicles leaving the site. ADB'123-79 HARBOR SQUARE ASSOCIATES The circulation system concept, as proposed, appears ;. ;,acceptable.. A detailed, dimensioned site plan showing all utility and,road{systems shall be required prior to ' any further review., DS/mt r 13Jr 1980 AGREEMENT AND COVENANT CONSTITUTING Uir. Of P, tJerks A CONTRACT REZONE co This Agreement contains the covenants entered into between THE PORT OF 0% EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "THE PORT" 9-4 and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to C) as "THE CITY". O U"N WITNESSETH: O p WHEREAS, THE PORT proposes the development of an approximately 14.6 np acre parcel of real property in Edmonds, located at the southwest corner of Dayton Street and State Route 104, and being more specifically described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section. 23, and the easterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 42* 34' 34" (n east 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 42* 34' 34" east 731.1.8 feet to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line south 58* 17' 06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88* 42' 05" east 524.20 feet; thence south 41* 39' 17" east 1.1.0.40 feet to the right of way of SR-104 (as � condemned under S.C.C. NO. 106375); thence south 1* 08' 54" west along said right of way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence south 73* 00' 00" west 240.00 feet; thence north 88* 30' 00" west 110.00 feet; thence north 66* 00' 00" west 140.00 feet; thence north 40* 00' 00" west 125.00 feet; thence north 1* 00' 00" west 200.00 feet; thence north 37* 00' 00" west 260.00 feet; thence south 71.* 00' 00" west 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning; and WHEREAS, THE PORT has applied for a change in the zoning of the subject property from its current IP classification to CG and OS and has tendered this agreement to the CITY; and WHEREAS, THE CITY has including, but not limited to reviewed by its Planning and Commission, and has fully review; and caused the application in its entirety, the Environmental Impact Statement, to be Engineering Departments and by its Planning considered recommendations made after such B005060198 VOL 166E PAGE 2450 CITY Y C'! Ff?;t WHEREAS, THE PORT implement the terms of development; and has determined a willingness and ability to this agreement in the course of its proposed WHEREAS, THE PORT and THE CITY are willing to enter into an agreement for a contract rezone reclassifying the parcel from IP to CG and OS; now therefore, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1 In consideration of THE CITY reclassifying the subject property from IP to CG and OS, and for so long as the property remains so classified, THE PORT covenants as follows: A To develop the subject property in substantial accord with the development plan set forth in Attachment "A" (including additions thereto) attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, subject to the right to make minor revisions including but not limited to the following: 1) The number, arrangement, and shape of buildings may be altered without increasing the gross floor area, general distribution of buildings, or significantly altering the looped circulation system; 2) Parking areas may be modified without reducing the number of spaces provided, the general distribution of spaces, or the amount of landscaping; 3) The number and arrangement of building service accesses (overhead doors, loading docks, etc.) may be altered so long as these service accesses are screened from both Dayton Street and State Route 104. Such minor revisions shall be subject to approval by the Edmond's Department of Community Development. B To develop the subject property in accord with the following development standards: 1) The minimum setback for buildings from Dayton Street and State Route 104 shall be twenty five (25) feet; 2) The minimum setback for parking from Dayton Street and State Route 104 shall be ten (10) feet; 3) All outdoor display of merchandise shall be subject to the same minimum setback as parking areas and the setback area shall he well landscaped; 8005060198 2 VOL 1668 PAGE 2451 4) All signs and advertising devices shall be subject to the requirements for signs located in a BC or IP zone pursuant to Title 20, SIGN CODE, of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines as now exists or may be hereafter amended or recodified; - 5) Outdoor storage and/or assembly areas shall be screened from Dayton Street and State Route 104 by a site obscuring fence or buffer pursuant to Section 12.14.050(i) of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines as now exists or may be hereafter amended or recodified; 6) All structures, fences and other architectural features shall be compatibly designed to give the overall development of the subject property unity and continuity; 7) The maximum building height shall be thirty five (35) feet, anJ ro building shall exceed two stories in height; 8) All -buildings and structures shall be subject to Architectural Design Board (ADB) approval. C To limit the land uses established on the subject property to those uses permitted by Section 12.13.270 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines as now exists or may be hereafter amended or recodified, and subject to the following: 1) The following uses shall be prohibited: A) Automotive wrecking; B) Automotive sales; C) Car washes; D) Drive-in Restaurants; E) Fuel storage yards; F) Kennels; G) Motels; H) Mobile home parks; I) Residences, except for J) Service Stations. a caretaker and/or guard; 2) The following uses permitted in the CG zone shall be limited as follows: A) Small boat building, repair, and preparation shall be limited to boats not exceeding sixty five (65) feet in length; B) Fabrication and sale of metal, wood, plastic, ,cloth, and similar products of light industry shall specifically exclude the fabrication of major structural steel forms, boiler making, and similar activities involving excessive noise, or major trucking in terms of over -standard dimensions per unit or over -standard weight of load, except for small boats. 8005060 198 3 VOL 1668 PAGE 2452 _, . a is D That the northwest portion of the Burlington Northern Railroad remainder of the development to across the railroad right of way. the subject property used by will be fenced off from the eliminate indiscriminant access E That all leases entered into by THE PORT shall be conditioned upon the lessee meeting or exceeding the performance standards established by Section 12.14.050 of the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines as now exists or may be hereafter amended or recodified, and not conducting activities in such a manner as to become a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood. F That that portion of the subject parcel from the south property line located within the "Union Oil" marsh to a line twenty five (25) feet landward from the edge of the marsh should be zoned "Open Space" to protect the integrity of the marsh. The remainder of the property should be zoned CG. G That in order to allow for future expanded access to the edge of the marsh, THE PORT agrees to construct the following walkway at such time as THE CITY constructs a connecting walkway across the marsh from the south; A walkway paralleling S.R. 104 from the interior looped street to the south eastern corner of the subject parcel, and proceeding from there along the edge of the marsh to intersect with the existing path along the marsh in the central southern portion of the subject parcel. 2 If consistant with the public health and welfare, THE CITY will cause the necessary ordinances to he enacted to rezone the subject property from IP to CG and OS for those uses as defined and permitted by the Edmonds Land Use Guidelines, and for such uses as are contemplated and intended by this agreement and the Attachments 3 Amendments to the development plan (Attachment "A") or this Agreement may be made by either THE PORT or THE CITY upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application. No applications shall be made by THE PORT or THE CITY or their successors or assigns to amend the underlying zoning of CG and OS for a period of two years from the date of this Agreement. Thereafter, either THE PORT or its successors or assigns, or THE CITY may, upon application filed in the same manner as a rezone application, apply to amend or terminate the provisions and covenants of the Agreement or to change the zoning on said property. Said application to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other application for a rezone of property in the City of Edmonds. 4 THE CITY shall be under no obligation to issue THE PORT or its successors or assigns a building permit or other permits or approvals for improvements or expansions upon any of the subject property of THE PORT unless such improvements or expansions lie within the terms hereof and the applicable ordinances at the time of any application for building permit or other permits or approvals. 8005060198 4 VOL 1668 PAGE 2453 • Ci T `." CLEi C. Ec �, r 5 The Edmond's Department of Community Development is granted authority to interpret and apply this agreement. Where there is uncertainty and/or disagreement concerning any substantive term of this agreement, including the Attachments, THE PORT may request that the matter he put on the next available_agenda of City Council for a hearing and resolution of the disagreement. If THE PORT disagrees with the decision of City Council, the matter may he filed in the Snohomish County Superior Coj.art as a Request for a Declaratory Judgment or other appropriate action. 6 This agreement and each part of it shall be considered covenants running with the land covered hereby and shall he binding upon the successors and assigns of THE PORT and THE CITY. It shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the grantor/grantee index with THE PORT being listed as grantor and THE CITY as grantee and all costs of such recordation shall be paid by THE PORT. Such recordation and payment of said costs shall be a condition precedent to THE PORT exercising any rights under the terms of the agreement. 7 The terms of this agreement may be specifically enforced. If either party shall bring suit to enforce any of the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party may be awarded reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs in such amount as is set by the court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this contract th is 36 day of 1980. THE PORT OF EDMONDS By (� P E SIDENT ATTEST: --"� /I SECRETARY CITY OF EDMONDS --2 1 By J� M R ATTEST: L�1 4EMANDS CITY CLfRK 8005060198 5 VOL J668 PACE 2454 STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of Snohomish On this day personally appeared before me Harve H. Harrison and Irene Varney known personally to me as the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edmonds, Wa. and who acknowledged that they signed the foregoing instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ,,,,,,,.tt&,i,ven under my hand and official Cb 2 !1 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of Snohomish seal this 20 day of � c.�. , 1980. NO•ARY3PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at (�e--,—-d,-c - Z� On this day personally appeared before me Gordon A. Maxwell.and T. P. Chittenden known personally to me as the President and Secretary of The Port Commission of The Port of Edmonds, Wa. and who acknowledged that they signed the foregoing instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this0� day of///-flt/ , 1980. O U U Q ` O 9 ;y Z PUBLI ✓ji+fee of 8005060198 ..VOL i668 PAGE 2455 Exhibit "A" Development Plan N Ij AM Approximate Edge.of I ZItl Union Oil Marsh U, in Portion to be Zoned O. S.--, klo to* --Portion to be Zoned C.G---Z� HARBOR SQUARE-- SFL - 04 A Business Park by the Port of Edmonds m - �,A QL April 22,1980 0 F10 COPY MEMO TO: FROM. SUBJECT: BN/jf 1 Q• Planning Department James E. Adams, P.E. City Engineer April 17, 1980 STq fFT Fl(E HARBOR SQUARE EIS/C01241ENTS TO TRAFFIC SECTION MITIGATING MEASURES 1-A: On -street parking is a privilege that has been granted by City Council action creat- ing a two-hour parking limitation, 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. within the C.B.D. This was completed to make a uniform policy. We have been given directions to provide parking within the C.B.D., so we are op- posed to removal of existing public parking. 1-B: We believe that the proposal will create a peak -hour demand on the existing traffic control system. The applicant will cause the traffic problem and should be required to furnish the solution. The installation of a separate right -turn lane could be a portion of the solution. 49d&t JA14ES E. ADAMS W.- • CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 93020 . (206) 775-2525 DEPART?LENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Mr. James Reid Reid, Middleton & Associates 324 Main Street Edmonds, I -IA. 98020 Attention: Herb Carpenter Gentlemen: HARVE 14. HARRISON MAYOR, April 1, 1980 SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE PROPOSAL z'!C 1980 '=,7 Oe�e/ d Oe0t The Public Works Department requests a copy of the final draft of the Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.). Our review was based on the preliminary draft only. t•,1e made a cursory review of the Planning Depart- ment's copy of the final E.I.S.; but we do need a copy for our review and final comments. Sincerely, AM JAMES E. ADAMS, P.E. City Engineer J A/jf. cc/Planning Dept. M CIVIC CENTER - MMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525 DSPARTi''."!T OF PUBLIC WORKS I-IARVF H. HARRISON MAYOR April 1, 1980 Mr- James Reid Reid, Middleton & Associates 324 Main Street Edmonds, TLA- 98020 Attention: Herb Carpenter CE Gentlemen: SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE PROPOSAL The Public Works Department requests a copy of the .final draft of the Environmental Impact Statement (E-I.S-). Our review was based on the preliminary draft only. We made a cursory review of the Planning Depart- ment's copy of the final E.I.S.; but we do need a copy for our review and final comments. Sincerely, JAMES E. ADAMS, P.E. City Engineer JEA/ j f_ cc/Planning Dept. March 21, 1980 MEMO T0: PLANNING DEPART?ErIT/Phefff- Nii G'COP'll!IISSION FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR PLANNING COPIRIISSIOPI !IFETING IIARCH 26 1980 ST-1-80 FRANK TAYLOR (1) Deletion of a cul-de-sac shown on the Official Street Map at the north end of 6th Avenue South and also (2) to amend the Official Street Map and vacate a portion of the right-of-way of 6th Avenue South which extends south from Elm Street. STREET FILE E (1) Engineering does not oppose this de- letion. (2) Engineering is reviewing corrected docu- ments submitted.by applicant on 3-20-80. Cursory review indicates no major errors. PRD-1-80 HARBOR PROPERTIES - 17 Unit planned residential develop- ment West of 2nd Ave. South and North of Elm St. If this were developed as single lots, RS-6, areas of approximately 20% would be utilized for circulation, leaving approximately 92,766 sq. ft. for development of approximately 15 RS-6 lots. Preliminary Engineering require- 3 -- ments attached are subject to revision. ST-2-80 RECON ENTERPRISES Application to vacate a portion of.right-of- way of 4th Ave. South adjacent to Seaview Condominiums. Engineering recommends approval of this amend- ment to the Official Street Map and does not oppose the vacation of right-of-way if abutting owners are required to pay City for property. R-1-£30 MR. AND MRS. DONALD GLENN - Rezone of property at 522 Dayton St, from -MI to BC or BN Engineering does not oppose the rezone. Site improvements to City standards at time of A.D.B. application. JAMES E . ADAMS P.E. Patrick Wilson Dt CITY ENGINEER March 12, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE E.I.S. DATED JANUARY, 1980 The following are responses to comments on page 112 of subject document: 1. & 2. The proposed channelization plan has not been adequately addressed. Currently on -street parking is allowed on both sides of Dayton Streets Aoest of SR 104, A potential conflict exists from vehicles exiting from Safeway parking lot who may desire to turn East on SR 104. A separate storage lane may be required. We suggest a separate egress from the site to SR 104 Eastbound. The current policy of the W.S.D.O.T. Traffic Operations Engineer is to prohibit direct egress to SR 104 East oh% - Dayton Street. We recommend that the City of Edmonds request a variance of the policy thru the Highway Commission. To implement this channelization plan as proposed will require City Council action to amend the City code which now allows for on -street parking. Since we now have considerable parking conflictsin the Downtown area, we suggest that if any parking is eliminated by the project that replacement parking be provided on site. 3. This response isacceptable - .49---eApproac he City should, as part of it's approval of the project, require toxic substance control by all applicants intending to construct, lease, etc., any facility at Harbor Square. We suggest that the developer submit a plan to implement his policy. 4. Correction noted. Grit and oil separators are subject to detailed design review under Ordinance 1924 by the Public Works Department (correction acceptable). 5. Comment added on page 20 is acceptable. 6. Reference added on pages 6 and 20 .(acceptable correction). JEA : j ky • 0 MEMO TO: Planning Division March 12, 1980 FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE E.I.S. DATED JANUARY, 1980 The following are responses to comments on page 112 of subject document: 1. & 2. The proposed channelization plan has not been adequately addressed. Currently on -street parking is allowed on both sides of Dayton Street,,.,dobest of SR 104. A potential conflict exists from vehicles exiting from Safeway parking lot who may desire to turn East on SR 104. A separate storage lane may be required. We suggest a separate egress from the site to SR 104 Eastbound. The current policy of the W.S.D.O.T. Traffic Operations Engineer is to prohibit direct egress to SR 104 East oh*-- Dayton Street. We recommend that the City of Edmonds request a variance of the policy thru the Highway Commission. To implement this channelization plan as proposed will require City Council action to amend the City code which now allows for on -street parking. Since we now have considerable parking conflicts in the Downtown area, we suggest that if any parking is eliminated by the project that replacement parking be provided on site. 3. This response is acceptable- he City should, as part of it's approval of the project, require toxic substance control by all applicants intending to construct, lease, etc., any facility at Harbor Square. We suggest that the developer submit a plan to implement his policy. 4. Correction noted. Grit and oil separators are subject to detailed design review under Ordinance 1924 by the Public Works Department .(correction acceptable). 5. Comment added on page 20 is acceptable. 6. Reference added on pages 6 and 20 .(acceptable correction). STREET FILE JEA : j ky �lvy,r Wrr,-/, NOTE: APPLICANT O*PRESENTATIVE 11UST BE PREOT AT HEARING AGENDA FOR EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION RECEj"VED COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. FED l9$O -� FEBRUARY 28, 1980 J 1. ROLL CALL ,/2 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES ✓ 3 . CORRESPONDENCE�- 4. STAFF REPORT ,,,5. PLANNING COMMISSION PARTICIPATION STR,� ET FILE 6. CONTINUED AGENDA f-RANY- TAYZ-e>K, R-12-79 ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A CONTRACT REZONE FROM RS-6 TO RMH FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 6TH AVENUE SOUTH AND STATE ROUTE 104 (EDMONDS WAY) NEAR THE SOUTH END OF 5TH AVENUE SOUTH. 7. AGENDA u)cA "A j,ti°'i S Ad R-4-79 & CP-2-79 If I� .S 4444 C gd'tFF�C' c,t Contract rezone from IP to CG (Industrial Park to 3�y roR�General Commercial) and proposed amendment to the r- f04K1-1001 Comprehensive Plan to change the designation of the =aR so following described property from Industrial to Business: a 14.61 acre parcel on the east side of Burlington Northern Railroad, the west side of State Highway 104, the north side of Union Oil Marsh and on the south side of Dayton Street. UP) /J ;nok"I e,l P-1-80 ROBERT BR.UBAKER - Four lot .formal subdivision, variance from street standards for the access -road and i5ye variance relaxing the length to width ratio on Lot 4 at 9122 Main Street legally described as follows: the north 501 feet of Lot 8, Block 5, Alderwood Manor #9, except the north 100 feet of the west 208.14 .feet thereof. (RS-8) January 4, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department STREET FILE FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT:' CO11ME-NTS ON DRAFT EIS FOR HARBOR SQUARE Attached please find Engineering Division's comments in connection with the draft impact statement for Harbor.Square. j ak Attachment Ivor, 1riz l 1,11,► �� • 00anuary 4, 1980 DRAFT E.I.S. ON HARBOR SQUARE - COMMENTS 1. What is channelization plan for Dayton Street? 2. Do you intend to apply to remove on -street parking from Dayton Street, and if so, where will you provide the additional parking stalls? 3. It is stated that runoff from the site shall be directed into the marsh. Certain of the "permitted uses" as stated in the pro- posed contract will be dealing with toxic substances in their day-to-day work; i.e., fabrication of plastic, boat building and repair. What steps will be taken to prevent any of these _�. materials from running into the marsh with the storm water runoff? What will be their ultimate disposition? 4. Summary, Item B.l.c: Mitigating measures relate to water quality whereas impacts relate to water quantity. Were lines skipped during typing? Both water quantity and water quality need to be addressed. 5. Existing Conditions, Item C: Detailed drainage measures are subject to surveys by the applicant to establish distances and elevations and -engineering designs to determine hydraulic performance. Drainage•measures.are subject.to additional reviews by the Public Works Department. Summary Item B.2.d: Existing storm systems in Dayton Street do not have adequate capacity during high tide, as stated elsewhere in report. This statement should reflect this situ- ation. 7. It should be stated that detailed subsurface investigations and foundation engineering are required and are subject to additional reviews and approvals by the Public Works Department. 8. Page numbers are needed to facilitate discussions and referencing. CITY OF EDMONDS . CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775.25M COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT January 7, 1980 Mr. Herb Carpenter Reid, Middleton and Associates, Inc. 324 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 HARD RESPONSES TO HARBOR SQUARE DRAFT ENIVRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) Dear Herb, Enclosed are the responses which we have received. I am including with them some additional comments from the Planning Department. All substantive issues appear to have been addressed to some extent in the Harbor Square Draft EIS. There are several matters which, having been questioned or commented on in the responses, seem to warrant particular attention. These are: 1. On pages 4 and 27 of the EIS it is stated that there is potential conflict of market interests on the project site with the commercial activity on Main Street and Fifth Avenue. The study of this competition and an additional one with existing or proposed office complexes should be expanded to analyze, if possible, the actual potential effect. 2. The lack of pedestrian facilities in the proposal has been questioned. On page 10 of the EIS a quotation from the Port Master Plan states that an objective is "to provide for much improved pedestrian facilities and circulation". The provision of a pedestrian circulation system through the site connecting to a trail along the marsh boundary should be included. 3. Protection of the marsh, and its resident wildlife, has been cited as an important consideration by a number of those responding to the EIS. This matter has been addressed in the document. However, some of the specific concerns may require more extensive Drotection measures. (Please refer to a memo from Edmonds Public Works Department and a letter from the Department of Game.) Furthermore, any proposed Letter. to Mr. Herb Carpenter Page 2 - 1/7/80 system is only as good as its installation and maintenance, which should be subjected to careful scrutiny by experts in this field. 4. An important consideration in review of this proposal is the quality of the site layout, landscaping and design of the actual buildings. This concern has been expressed by respondents to the EIS. Of course, the quality of the final product is a result of the execution of the proposal and cannot fully be addressed in an EIS. However, assurances of quality of design, adequate screening, and compatibility of buildings will be important factors in the rezone contract which, if the proposal is approved, will be signed by the Port and the City of Edmonds. 5. Snohomish County Public Utility District has expressed some concern about provision of adequate electrical power. The use of passive solar facilities has been briefly mentioned. Perhaps use of these facilities could be more fully explored. These comments were generated by points raised in the eleven responses to the EIS which have been submitted to the Planning Depart- ment and forwarded to you. Sincerely, Mary u Block Acti Director Planning Department MLB/mt Enclosures December 10, 1979 MEMO TO: Edmonds Planning Office FROM: Harve H. Harrison Mayor RE: EIS DRAFT ,, Several citizens have expressed concern about rezoning this site for a mix of commercial, office and light industrial use. If the Port is permitted to build commercial and office space by selling tax-free bonds, they can produce rental space at a much cheaper rate than those who must borrow at the regular, interest rate to build rental space and thus free -enterprise cannot compete. There was no objection to the existing zone and the construc- tion of a light industrial development by the Port since it would not compete with the Downtown Edmonds office and store buildings. There was also no objection to the rezone 'if the land was leased out by the Port for private enterprisers to develop with their own funds or borrowed funds. HHH/ j g 10 r Response No. Comment by: Harve H. Harrison, Mayor The requested rezone is from the City's Industrial Park District, which permits only industrial uses, to the General Commercial District with a contract. As explained in the body of the E.I.S., the Port can not proceed with the implementation of its Comprehensive Plan without the zone change because they feel they must provide alternative locations for the industrial and commercial activities now in the marina area which will be displaced by planned improvements. The requested zone designation of General Commercial is the only zone that will -allow the range of land uses required to satisfy the Port's needs. In addition, due to Edmonds' locational disadvantage in relation to major highway access (I-5) and its distance from major market centers, it is presently not possible to proceed with development of the site within the limits contained in the present Industrial Park zoning. An indication of this twt is the fact that the property has been zoned, vacant, and available for ten years without development. The contract provisions of the requested rezone will limit the range of general commercial uses permitted and still allow marine oriented and light industrial uses (see the proposed rezone contract, Appendix B, page 70). The range of uses requested, the character of the site plan, the location of the site, and the clear 4-itension of the Port, all combine to reduce the potential conflict between the Harbor Square proposal and the "Downtown Edmonds office and store buildings". Questions concerning lease rates, financial mechanisms, and similar economic issues are normally excluded from consideration in environmental documents and land use determinations. However, since there appears to be concern from several parties that the Port will have a market advantage over private developers and that this advantage may adversely effect private property owners, the following is offered: 1. The Port has not decided and may not decide to build any of the buildings in Harbor Square. A decision by the Port to build any of the buildings will be based on a number of factors including; the willingness of private parties to lease and build, current market conditions, bonding capacity, construction estimates, and, of course, the reggulations controlling Port activities. As a sidelight, it should be pointed out that the Commercial Village project at the west end of Dayton Street (one of the Port's Master Plan elements) is being constructed by private parties on leased Port property. 2. The Port has. adopted as a -policy that if they build any of the buildings in Harbor Square, they will be leased at "market" rates. 3. Preliminary cost estimates conducted for the Port indicate that lease rates for either land or buildings will have to be at or slightly above market rates to achieve minimum bond coverage require- ments. One aspect of the project.'s cost is the substantial amount of "front end" investment in items that are not essential to the project, but are important to the Port Commission, the City Government, and we think, the citizens of the community. Among these items are the significant amount of landscaping, the selection " of building materials, the basic site design that does not maximize building area, the distribution of parking into smaller and less obtrusive lots, the use of roofing systems to enclose mechanical equipment, etc. 94 • 'k��F, STATE O� STATE OF b ? WASHINGTON md, �y'� 1889 a�1 Dixy Lee Ray Governor January 2, 1980 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753.6600 RECEIVED City of Edmonds JAN 4 1980 Community Development Department city of Edmonds Civic Center community Devel. Dept Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention Mr. John A.LaTourelle Gentlemen: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Harbor Square King County WRIA B-08 The Washington Department of Fisheries has reviewed the above -referenced statement and offers the following comments. There do not appear to be any direct adverse impacts upon fishery -resources under our jurisdiction. We do concur that the use of grit and oil separators are desirable prior to the discharge of surface water runoff to the marsh as effluent waters will eventually reach Puget Sound. In regard to the recently constructed fishing pier sponsored by this Department it appears development activities resulting from this action will not affect availibility of the 66 parking spaces designated for beach and pier users. What portion, if any, of the 150 new spaces identified in the Port Master Plan will be available to fishing pier users? Will future development activities resulting from .this rezone prohibit any potential use or access of the fishing pier? We appreciate the opportunity to review this statement and hope that our comments are useful. Sincerely, y Gordo Sandis6n, Director mr 3 j4w ry 4, 1980 Mary Lou Block City of Edmonds Community Development Dept. near Ka. Blocks ,As concerned, citizens of almonds, we wish to express ourlismay and disap- proval at the proposoi.rozone of the open space area at the southwest cornor of SS 104 and the NO Streod. in"torsection* t rt The onvironmom'ai i t stetonent proiictui as iacroase of approximately 38?4 . Witliola trips on Dayton ast**et« This alone should bo sxi'f aiont xeeis4n ,he reeen* rogne�st, -t UftY,and batter reasons for denial. Roading the 'aft of the Samber Square environmental impact stator mt is in a let of ways puzzling and #*pressing. ftny readers are unable to understand the logic whiff' requires that the last few acres of open space remaining now the water be "developed," into an industrial tompiox. Some of us who have read the section describing the master land use plan have difficulty seeing real wisdom in the decree which says that the best use for a beach area is to cover It with structures to houeo restaurants, retail business and industry. Some of us think that a beach would be bettor. For the site of the pro)osed Industrial park, some of as think that "an space would be better. Edmonds is a: fine shereside rosi.dentUh, com malty. When the "Developers" and "improvers" are through, it won't be, We.urge the Fort Commission and the Council to take a second look at the which holds that the quality of life in ftmontslt st be sacrificed to the municipal Wrsuit of the fast. buck, Rah a aiawle Bill 1242`°C4 nads , ace Ndmen+tep Washington L x , . �- RECEiWD JAN 0 4'80 CM Of EDMONDS PLANNING DEW. 4 �. tie ��`• �_�� ;�:. f � - — r�: ,. 4anuary 4, 1980 DRAFT E.I.S. ON HARBOR SQUARE - COMMENTS 1. What is channelization plan for Dayton Street. 2. Do you intend to apply to remove on -street parking from Dayton Street, and if so, where will you provide the additional parking stalls? 3. It is stated that runoff_ from the site shall be directed into the marsh. Certain of the "permitted uses" as stated in the pro- posed contract will be dealing with toxic substances in their day-to-day work; i.e., fabrication of plastic, boat building and repair. What steps will be taken to prevent any of these materials from running into the marsh with the storm water runoff? What will be their ultimate disposition? 4. Summary, Item B.l.c: Mitigating measures relate to water quality whereas impacts relate to water quantity. Were lines skipped during typing? Both water quantity and water quality need to be addressed. 5. Existing Conditions, Item C: Detailed drainage measures are subject to surveys by the applicant to establish distances and elevations and engineering designs to determine hydraulic performance. Drainage measures are subject to additional reviews by the Public Works Department. 6. Summary Item B.2.d: Existing storm systems in Dayton Street do not have adequate capacity during high tide, as stated elsewhere in report. This statement should reflect this situ- ation. 7. It should be stated that detailed subsurface investigations and foundation engineering are required and are subject to additional reviews and approvals by the Public Works Department. 8. Page numbers are needed to facilitate discussions and referencing. January 4, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department JAN 0 4'80 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING pEpy FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: C011MENTS ON DRAFT EIS FOR HARBOR SQUARE Attached please find Engineering Division's comments in connection with the draft impact statement for Harbor Square. j ak Attachment Mr. John A. La Tourelle. City of Edmonds Community Development Department Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. La Tourelle: Harbor Square 0 410 West Harrison Street, P.O. Box 9863 (206) 344-7330 Seattle, Washington 98109 January 4, 1980 The following comments are submitted in response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Harbor Square. On Page 17 you state that Edmonds meets NAAQS for all pollutants. This might be true but at this time, Edmonds technically lies in non -attainment areas, as defined currently by EPA, for carbon monoxide and photochemical oxidants. Mitigating measures for dust suppression are discussed on Page 19. It is suggested that to assist the action sponsor, he be advised that Section 9.15 of Regulation I of Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency governs this type of source. A copy of Agency Guidelines pursuant to Section 9.15 is enclosed. When businesses.for the -.site are determined, the action sponsor should advise his tenants that air contaminant sources require permit approval in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation I. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. SERVING KING COUNTY 410 West Harrison St. P.O. Box 9863 Seattle, 98109 (206) 344-7330 KITSAP COUNTY tp Dial Operator for Toll Free Number Zenith 8385 Bainbridge Island, 98110 Dial 344-7330 PIERCE COUNTY 213 Hess Building Tacoma, 98402 (206)383-5851 SNOHOMISH COUNTY (206)259-0288 Very truly yours, A. R. Dammkoehler Air Pollution Control Officer RECEIVED JAN 0 8 '80 :CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEPT. ft BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN: Gene Lobe, Commissioner Kitsap County; VICE CHAIRMAN: Patrick J. Gallagher, Commissioner Pierce County; James B. Haines, Commissioner Snohomish County; Glenn K. Jarstad, Mayor Bremerton; William E. Moore, Mayor Everett; Mike Parker, Mayor Tacoma; Harvey S. Poll, Member at Large; Charles Royer, Mayor Seattle; John D. Spellman, King County Executive; A. R. Dammkoehler, Air Pollution Control Officer. �a6 STATE• o� STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON w� $ Highway Administration Building, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753-6005 NO �Dixy Lee Ray Governor January 4, 1980 Ms. Mary Lou Brock RECEIVED Acting Manager, Planning Division City of Edmonds J�t� 9,980 Edmonds, WA 98020 City of EdMOOds Dear Ms. Brock: Cornm4in4ty DeVeL Dept As requested in your letter of November 30, 1979, following are our comments concerning the Harbor Square Draft E.I.S. The physical location of the project, situated southwest and diagonally across the street from our Dayton Street Toll Plaza, will have a definite effect on the ferry system traffic. Although the ingress and egress for Harbor Square are all shown on Dayton Street, the peak unloading of ferries will delay traffic movements from Dayton Street onto SR 104. It should be noted that most of the annual traffic control dollars expended with the City of Edmonds are related to assuring minimal interference by ferry traffic with local non -ferry traffic due to our shoreside holding compound being bounded by Dayton Street on the south and Main Street on the north. The Harbor Square project will cause local and community traffic to be further inconvenienced and delayed at the intersection of Dayton and SR 104. It should also be noted the E.I.S. Report specifically acknowledges the potential problem by calling for greater involvement by ferry system personnel in local traffic control. If at all possible, we should be developing a plan to relieve the ferries personnel from responsibility for local traffic control. Although the new holding lane on northbound SR 104 should help alleviate some of the adverse conditions, it is not totally known what the ferry system impact will be until the restoration of the Hood Canal Bridge. FLP:F/B Very truly yours, FRED L. PEIL Assistant Secretary for Marine Transportation � 3 BJORN 0 THUftENINC., REALTORS PZ) 322 MAIN STREET • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 775-1953 January 3, 1980 Planning Department City of Edmonds Edmonds, WA. Re: Port Development of Oid Union Oil Marsh Gentlemen: It has come to my attention that a major development is being proposed for this property. This is an extremely sensitive piece of real estate with great visability from both the property owners on the hills overlooking it and the ferry traffic passing by it. I have not seen the proposal but similar properties in Bellevue have been developed as a combination industrial and/or office park interspersed with waterways and walkways in a park like setting. This should be the theme of this development; visually pleasing to Edmonds residents and to future users as well, possibly with public walkways through easements. In other words, a combination park and industrial office development. Please keep me informed ons the meeting schedule so that I may have further imput. BT/gs ee! Ente....,.,....; .. M.._........__.._.... IECEIM) JAN 0 4 '80 CITY OF rVAIONDS PWIVI F, DEPT. A11 sign of 15 sq. ft. The window signage was of the illuminated reader - board type. The applicant said there were two 60 watt bulbs to illuminate the sign at night and it could be flashing or not flashing. He was advised that flashing would be in violation of the Code. MR. HINTZ MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. KINDERFATHER, TO APPROVE ADB-132-79, PROVIDED THE READERBOARD SIGN DOES NOT HAVE A FLASHING LIGHT. MOTION CARRIED. A short recess was announced. ADB-133-79 DIAMOND PARKING - Review of landscaping for parking lot at the southwest corner of Sunset and James Sts. (BC) Mr. Bowman advised that this item would be continued to the February meeting. ADB-134-79 CLAY ENTERPRISES - Review of site plan and elevations for duplex at 9910 76th Ave. W. (RD) No representative was present for this item. It was moved to the bottom of the agenda, but no one appeared. CHAIRMAN LaFON THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. SPANFELNER, THAT ADB-134-79 BE CONTINUED TO THE FEBRUARY MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-135-79 LAURENCE and CAROLYN HARRIS - Review of preliminary site plan and elevations for professional office at 601 Main St. (BC) The applicants wished to restore an old house to use as a professional office building and had received a Conditional Use Permit for this use. Colors had not yet been decided and the landscaping plan was to be submitted later. The Engineering Division found the site plan unacceptable and had recommended a revision. At this time the applicants were requesting approval of the elevations only. The existing structure will not be altered significantly but will be restored. Mrs. Harris said they had not yet selected the colors. Mr. Harris stated there will be a new roof, probably of asphalt or asphalt shingles. The siding will not be replaced except for some which is broken. He said more windows may be added. He planned to have a cathedral ceiling about 2/3 of the distance from the front to the back and to have bronze flush mounted skylights to provide extra light. MR. KINDERFATHER MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. SPANFELNER, TO GIVE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO ADB-135-79 FOR RENOVATION OF THE HOUSE. Chairman LaFon advised the applicants that preliminary approval would allow them to start working. Mr. Hintz was concerned about the skylights, noting that they should not extend above the ridge line of the other portion of the roof. Chairman LaFon said they would be lowered because of necessity in the construction of the house. THE MOTION CARRIED. ADB-123-79 PORT OF EDMONDS - Review of preliminary site plan and elevations for business park t the southwest corner of Dayton`St.-and-SR-104 (IP) Herb Carpenter of Reid, Middleton & Associates was present to review -the proposal and ask for comments for the draft EIS. No decisions were to be made by the Board. Mr. Carpenter asked for criticism and suggestions, but no formal action. He said approximately 1/3 of the area will be required for existing uses in the marina area which will move to this business park. Seven buildings are proposed with 200,000+ sq. ft. of building area. Both points of access will be from Dayton St., with a loop road system on the site. Buildings will be two stories and will have a unified identification system. Three parking locations were shown which were in excess of the parking requirements, and Mr. Carpenter indicated the uses of those areas may be flexible. Mr. Kinderfather commented that this development should be an asset to Edmonds, but he was concerned that the the kind of retail and commercial development not be such that would take away from the strength of the downtown area. He said he would like to see the retail business be marine oriented so it does not compete with the downtown. Mr. Carpenter did not think there would be a conflict. He noted that the downtown ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 5 - January 2, 1980 C7 area is definitely pedestrian oriented and he felt this site would never generate a lot of people. Mr. Spanfelner said he favored the concept. There was no further discussion. Mr. Hintz expressed concern about remarks made that Building Inspectors do not have time to check on details of plans. It was noted that if directed to do so by the ADB they will. Mr. Spanfelner said that at the final inspection to issue the Certificate of Occupancy is the first time a detailed inspection is made, and that is after the fact. Chairman LaFon suggested that the time may come when a contractor is made to tear something out and do it the way approved --then some of these after -the -fact changes may stop. The Board had been provided copies of General Rules of Procedure for the the conduct of meetings. It was determined that they would be reviewed when a full Board was present, and then would be adopted by resolution. There was no further business.to come before the Board, and the meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 6 - January 2, 1980 6 STATE.O .� STATE OF WASHINGTON mN Dixy Lee Ray �y� �sse aoy Gouernor to DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 206/753-2800 Olympia, Washington 98504 December 27, 1979 Mary Lou Block City of Edmonds Planning Department Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Ms. Block: kECEIVED. DEC s 1979 City of Ea.. —,as Community Devel. Deek Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft environmental impact statement for Harbor Square. Generally, the EIS appears to be a well written document. For your future reference, I would like to note that the SEPA Guidelines require a "list of elements of the environment" be appended to every EIS. This list is contained in WAC 197-10-444. If you have any question, please.call me at (206) 753-6890. BJR:mgh Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section 3 STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I/ F O l WASHINGTON Highway Administration Building, Olympia, Washington 9&%4 206/753-6005 Dixy Lee Ray December 18, 1979 R�CE�vE�a Governor CCC201gl t tdmonds pave►. peoL s Mr. John A. La Tourelle, Director Community Development Department Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 City of Edmonds Harbor Square: Business Park Draft Environmental Impact Statement "^ar Mr. La Tourcll : We have reviewed the subject proposal and site plan and have the following comments: Since SR 104 is a limited aceess highway, no direct access to it from the proposal, will be permitted. Access will have to be provided by way of Dayton Street west of station Dayton 11 + 75. (See attached Plan Sheet.) It appears this has been considered in laying out the proposal, therefore, we have no objection to the proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 753-3811. RSN:Ip WPA/WBH Attachment cc: J. D. Zirkle/T. R. Burke R. Albert Environmental Section Sincerely, ROBERT S. NIELSEN Assistant Secretary for Public Transportation and Planning A?e By: WIL IAM P. �ALBOHN Environmental Planner � 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON Dixy Lee Ray Governor 18 December 1979 6 0* DEPARTMENT OF GAME 600 North Capitol Way, GJ-11 Olympia, WA 98504 206/753-5700 Mr. John A. Latourelle City of Edmonds Community Development Department Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT: Harbor Square in Port of Edmonds (Rezone 14.6 acres to business park in Section 3, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, Snohomish County) Mr. Latourelle: Your document was reviewed by our staff as requested; our comments follow. We commend you for planning to preserve "Union Oil Marsh". As you state, it is a sensitive area supporting important animal populations. To adequately protect the marsh, we recommend that any contiguous vegetation within 200 feet of the marsh be preserved. We also recommend that stormwater be cleaned of pollutants before it is discharged to the marsh. If oil and industrial pollutants are not removed, they could seriously impact this wetland and its wildlife. We wonder about the secondary impacts of the proposal. Where would the 150 additional parking spaces for the marina be? We recommend that it not be planned for intertidal areas. It is very difficult to obtain approval on Corps Public Notices from state and federal resource agencies for non -water dependent fills. Is there any possibility that occupation of the site as a business park rather than a marine industry site would force the heavier industry to more sensitive areas? Will any of the business planned for the park be non -water related? We appreciate your attempts to preserve sensitive areas and direct development to areas most suited for it. Thank you for sending your document. We hope you find our comments helpful. Sincerely, THE DEPARTMENT OF GAME /!5; ;�FfECE1VED Bob Zeig lied Ecologist Environmental Affairs Program D E C 2 e 1919 Habitat Management Division City of Edmonds pommunity Devel. DeoL a @ 3 101 ldb �Id30 9NINpyU, SONOW03 30 ,W 60 0 330 QRAIaa321 6L-��e�-fly Typical Elevation HARBOR SQUARE AD3 03;yA Business Park by the Port of Edmonds r Typical Section HARBOR SQUARE, �� A Business Park by the Port of Edmonds SONOWp3.10 VV / 0 61,t003o • 49 W104ij F,j HARBOR, SQUARE /40&0,3-7y A. Business Park by tho Port of Edmonds • �Q �3_ 29 RECEIVED DEC 0 479 pBANING ry OF EDMDND DEPr!$ N o ao ci.+, .r"c+ .�<•• - _ ' nvo j or MOMs,gs:�:-�aA.:�i J I NNW tE111�G�ll1111Ha�� Ll� MD Ir HAIRBOF k Business Park h% QUAR Pert of Edme FM :1 December 10, 1979 MEMO TO: Edmonds Planning Office FROM: Harve H. Harrison Mayor RE: EIS DRAFT Several citizens have expressed concern about rezoning this site for a mix of commercial, office and light industrial use. If the Port is permitted to build commercial and office space by selling tax-free bonds, they can produce rental space at a much cheaper rate than those who must borrow at the regular interest rate to build rental space and thus free -enterprise cannot compete. There was no objection to the existing zone and the construc- tion of a light industrial development by the Port since it would not compete with the Downtown Edmonds office and store buildings. There was also no objection to the rezone if the land was leased out by the Port for private enterprisers to develop with their own funds or borrowed funds. HHH/ j g F=L=JC32320 California St., Everett, Washington 98201 258-8211 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT No. 1 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 1107, Everett, Washington 98206 Ms. Mary Lou Block City of Edmonds Planning Division City Hall 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Ms. Block: December 7, 1979 RE: Draft EIS for Harbor Square Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced environ- mental document. Presently the District has an overloaded distribution system in the general vicinity of the proposed project. The Draft EIS does not indicate any type of load data; therefore, the District is unable to accurately assess what impact this development would have on our facilities. In reading the DEIS, it is anticipated that a substantial load will be created by this development and the District strongly suggests that as this project nears the actual construction phase, the developer coordinate the needed power requirements with the District to insure that adequate capacity will be available on a timely basis. If there is any further assistance we can provide, please contact Mr. Jerry Elkington at 258-8437. Yours very truly, Frank M. Reis Customer Service Director RECEIM D r C 12 1979 (;,:y of Edmonds Community Devel. Dept. 9 RECEIVED DEC 61979 city of Edmonds community Oevel. DOO- MEMO TO: �'Iu SUBJECT: December . 5 , 19 79 Mary Lou Block, Acting Manager Planning Division Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal HARBOR SQUARE E.I.S. I would like to suggest a re -write of the paragraph pertaining to fire protection. The way this section is currently written it could lead to a misunderstanding of fire protection actually available. Below, is my suggested new paragraph: Fire protection is provided by the City of Edmonds Fire Department. The site is located one mile from the civic center fire station and three and one-half miles from the Five Corners fire station which is manned on a 24-hour basis. The Department has a total compliment of two stations, four pumper trucks, one ladder truck, and one aid car. Manpower totals 17 which includes five staff positions which man the civic center station during regular working hours. The 12 fire fighters who are assigned to the Five Corners station man it with four persons on a 24-hour basis. The Department also has 33 volunteer fire fighters who are on call. The Department serves the City of Edmonds and contracts fire protection to the Town of Woodway and the Union Oil Company. The Fire Department reports that it is concerned with the potential for the storage and use of flammable and com- bustable materials and processes in this area. GLM:ly December 4, 1979 RECEIVED MEMO TO: Mary Lou Block, Associate Planner QEG 51979 Planning Division City Of Edmonds FROM: Jim Jessel, Manager community Devel, DOM Parks and Recreation Division SUBJECT: COMMENTS TO HARBOR SQUARE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT In reviewing the Harbor Square E.I.S., you note the lack of park and recreation amenities within the proposed development. The new employees and customers will generate a significant demand on our already saturated waterfront properties. Bicy- cling, jogging, skating, and walking opportunities should be provided, and a multi -purpose path encircling the Harbor Square development is recommended. The defined path border would also reduce future encroachment on the delicate marsh edge. The E.I.S. has been sent to the Park Board members and I will forward their comments as they are received. JJ/mw r f DATE December 4,1979 FILE # SITE PLAN CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS t� LANDSCAPE PLAN APPLICATION to the ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 46 SIGN EXHIBITS (3)2 Receipt ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE 1/2/80 OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE Port of Edmonds PHONE 774-0549 ADDRESS 456 Admiral Way ZIP CODE CONTACT PERSON Herb Carpenter, Reid, Middleton & Asso., Inc. PHONE •SI 1 775-3434 ADDRESS 324 Main Street, Edmonds, Washington ZIP CODE 98020 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER PROPERTY ADDRESS S.W. Corner, Dayton St. & SR 104 PHONE ZONING LEGAL DESCRIPTION Attached. RE r%C c. ' . PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: �,�,��,►��onks 1. Building Plans — Preliminary X Final Site Plan X Landscape Plan Elevations X 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Attached (Page 13 of the Environmental Impact Statement) APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT Sprinq 19 ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK Two to Three Years I (we) hereby certify to the best of my (our) knowledge, that the statements and information contained herein are, in all respects, true and correct. (signature of 'Appic`an RECEIVED DEC 0 4'7y 12/78 CITY OF Eu'S`-NDS PLANNING UEPT. Bp D. DESCRIPT.1.ON OF PHASED CONS?RUCTION ELEMEINTS The Port hopes to construct the entire business park without obvious phasing by proceeding from one building to the next in sequence. E. MAJOR PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS OF THE PROPOSAL The development plan (see Figure 2, page ii) proposed by the Port involves seven buildings, located along a looped circulation system. The buildings closest to Dayton Street will be occupied by office and limited retail uses and those further from Dayton street by light industrial, warehouse and'non-puhlic oriented commercial uses. The building system proposed is such that a unified design theme can he maintainer) throughout the business park. The development plan also indicates substantial areas of landscaping and the screening of service and storage areas from Dayton Street and State Route 104. The south and southwest boundaries of the project site adjoin the "Union Oil Marsh". A fifteen foot wide natural huffer is proposed along the edge of the marsh to protect its fragile environment. Also proposed is an additional sethack of ten feet for huildings and paver! areas for added protection of the edge. Only two vehicle access points are proposed for the project. These points are to he offset from the entrances to the Safeway parking area to minimize the potential of conflicting vehicle turning movements into/out of the two developments. The Port will. he requesting that the City eliminate parking along the south sirle of Dayton Street to increase, its capacity and improve the site distance's in and out of the project. The Port may also request that the State alter the phasing of the traffic signal at the intersection of Dayton Street and State Route 104 to facilitate the traffic generated by this project and other developments in the vicinity. The construction of the business park will include some alteration to the present storm drainage of the site. Presently a small portion of the site drains toward Dayton Street which does not drain properly during periods of extremely high tide. Engineering investigations to date indicate that all of the site can be drained into the marsh. This would reduce the amount of storm drainage entering the Dayton Street system and provide some additional water supply to the marsh. Other engineering solutions are being considered which Would reduce the periodic hackup of storm water in Dayton Street. These solutions include diverting a portion of the Dayton Street storm drainage through the project site and into the marsh. RECEIVEa DEC 0 V-1q CITY L;r .; PLANfli", 1.3 • B. .LOCATION OF THE PROJECT The site is�located at the southwest corner of the SR-104 and Dayton Street (see Figure 1, page iii). The legal description of the site is as follows: That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., descrihed as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way north 42 degrees 34134" East 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 42 degrees 34'34" East 731.18 feet to the southerly right-of-way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right-of-way line South 58 degrees 17106" East 12.54 feet; thence South 88 degrees 42'06" East 524.29 feet; thence South 41 degrees 39'17" East 110.49 feet to the right-of-way of SR-104 (as condenmed under S.C.C. No. 106375); thence South 1 degree 08154" West along said. right-of-way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence South 73 degrees 00100" West ,1_40.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 30'00" West 110.00 feet; thence North 66 degrees 00100" west 140.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 00'00" West 125.00 feet; thence North 1 degree 00100" West 200.00 feet; thence North 37 degrees 00'00" West 260.00 feet; thence South 71 degrees 00'00" West 401.0n feet to the true point of beginning. RECEIVED I CITY OF EOMONDS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VE H. HARR ON MAYOR f 1�I r", t uUifC mites TO: Recipients of the Harbor Square Draft Environmental Impact Statement (E.I.S.) FROM: Mary Lou Block, Acting Manager, Planning Division DATE: November 30, 1979 Attached is a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Harbor Square. Harbor Square is a 14.62 Acre Business Park proposed by the Port of Edmonds to be located at the southwest corner of Dayton Street and State Route 104, east of the Port of Edmonds Marina. The E.I.S. was prepared for use in evaluating the Port's requested rezone of the Harbor Square site from an industrial classification to a contract controlled commercial classification. Your written comments on the E.I.S. are invited and should be directed to the City of Edmonds, Planning Division, City Hall, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. Comments on the E.I.S. should be received by January 5, 1980 to be included in the final document. After the Final E.I.S. is issued, including consideration of comments received during this review period, the Planning Commission, and subsequently City Council, will hold public hearings on the requested rezone. The E.I.S. will provide both of these bodies with information they need to properly evaluate the proposal. If you have questions concerning the Harbor Square proposal you may contact Mary Lou Block at the City's Planning Division at 775-2525, or Herb Carpenter at Reid, Middleton & Associates, representing the Port of Edmonds, at 775-3434. 6T€EET FILE .0 0 CITY OF EOMONOS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: RECIPIENTS FROM: MARY LOU BLOCK, ACTING MANAGER, PLANNING DIVISION DATE: NOVE1IBER 30, 1979 SUBJECT: HARBOR SQUARE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (E.I.S.) Attached is a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Harbor Square. Harbor Square.is a 14.62 Acre Business Park proposed by the Port of Edmonds to be located at the southwest corner of Dayton Street and State Route 104, east of the Port of Edmonds Marina. The E.I.S. was prepared for use in evaluating; the Port's requested rezone of the Harbor Square site from an industrial classification to a contract controlled commercial classification. Your written comments on the E.I.S. are invited and should be directed to the City of Edmonds, Planning Division, City Hall, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. Comments on the E.I.S. should be°recei-ved by January 5, 1980 to be included in the final document. After the Final E.I.S. is issued, including consideration of comments received during this review period, the Planning Commission, and subsequently City Council, will hold public hearings on the, requested rezone. The E.I.S. will provide both of these bodies with information they need to properly evaluate the proposal. If you have questions concerning the Harbor Square proposal you may contact Mary Lou Block at the City's Planning Division at 775-2.525, or Herb Carpenter at Reid, Middleton & Associates, representing the Port of Edmonds, at 775-3434. RECIPIENTS OF E.I.S FOR PORT OF EDM0NDS 1. - 2. 2 copies to Shoreline Committee, c/o Robert Pantlev, 936 Maple St, Edmonds Wa 98020 3. Park Board, c/o Jim Jessel, Parks & Recreation Division, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 4.-10. 7 copies to Members of the City Council, City_ Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 11. John Hodgin, 590 Hemlock Wy, Edmonds Wa 98020 12. Valina Walker, 23102 75th Ave W, Edmonds Wa 98020 13. John McGibbon, 424 3rd Ave S. #104, Edmonds Wa 98020 14. Floyd Smith, 814 Dayton, Edmonds Wa 98020 15. Keith Labelle, 8403 186th St S.W., Edmonds Wa 98020 16. Fred Ross, 1016 Daley, Edmonds Wa 98020 17. Laura Hall, 1140 Edmonds St, Edmonds Wa 98020 18. Mayor Harve H. Harrison, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds YV?a 98020 �19. Office of the City Attorney, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 20. Chb@f of Police Marlo Foster, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 21. Fire Chf)if Jack Weinz, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 22. Director of Public Works Fred Herzberg, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 23. City Clerk Irene Varney Moran, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 24. Manager of Parks & Recreation Division Jim Jessel, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 25. Acting Maro'ger of Planning Division Mary Lou Block, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 26. Snohomish County Planning Department, Snohomish County Courthouse, Everett Wa 98206 27.-30. 4 copies to Edmonds Public Library, City Hall, 250 5th Ave N, Edmonds Wa 98020 31. City of Lynnwood Planning Department, 19100 44th Ave W, Lynnwood Wa 98036 32. City of Woodway, Town Hall, Edmonds Wa 98020 33. Mountlake Terrace Planning Department, 23204 58th Ave W, Mountlake Terrace Wa 98043 34.-35. 2 copies to Edmonds School District No. 15, 3800 196th St. S.W., Lynnwood, Wa 98036 36.-37. 2 copies to Edmonds Community College, 20000 68th Ave W, Lynnwood Wa 98036 38. Burlington Northern Railroad, Regional Offices, 810 3rd, Seattle Wa 981n4 39. Union Oil Co. of California, 11720 Unoc.o Rd, Edmonds Wa 98020 40. Public Utility District No. 1, 2320 California, Everett Wa 98201 41. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency, 410 W Harrison, Seattle Wa 98119 42. Puget Sound Council of Governments, 216 lst Ave S, Seattle Wa 98104 43. Wa State Dept. of Fisheries 44. Wa State Dept. of Game, 509 Fairview N, Seattle Wa 98109 45. Wa State Dept. of Ecology, 4350 150th NE, Redmond Wa 98052 46. Wa State Dept. of Social & Health Services, State Office Bldg #2, Olympia Wa 98504 47. Wa State Dept. of Commerce & Economic Development, 101 General Administration Bldg, Oly 98504 48. Wa State Utilities & Transportation Commission, 1231 Andover Park E, Seattle Wa 98188 49. Wa. State Dept. of Transportation, Highway Administration Bldg, Olympia Wa 98504 50. Wa. State Dept. of Transportation, Division of Marine Transportation, Highway Admin, Bldg, O1y98504 51. Wa State PA7nning & Community Affairs Agency, 400 Capitol Center Bldg, Olympia 98504 STA TEo� 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON Ws 2` I889 <J0 Dixy Lee Ray Gouernor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of District Engineer, D-1, 6431 Corson Ave. So., C-81410, Seattle, Washington 98108 L,(-- City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 November 29, 1979 SR 104 CS 3130 Int Dayton St Attention: Fred F. Herzberg Director of Public Works. Gentlemen: Ul;. Ul ruuj:,, uulm' We have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Port of Edmonds concerning the proposed development at the inter- section of SR 104 and Dayton Street. Although the plan does not propose direct access to SR 104 we have been contacted by Reid Middleton & Associates concerning this and we wish to re -iterate that direct access to SR 104 cannot be allowed due to the limited access restrictions. We note one recommendation is to add one phase to the signal at SR 104 and Dayton Street. This signal is scheduled to be rebuilt to a fu2y actuated signal during the 1981-83 biennium which will in essence take care of the increase in traffic expected. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this E�,I.S. JFC:cmr cc: R. Knoll R. Magnuson Very truly yours, J. D. ZIRKLE, P. E. District Administrator ES F. CLEARY, P. E. affic Operations. Engineer STREET FILE Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan Harbor Square Complex Edmonds, Washington RECEIVE JUL 5 ^"95 ENGINEERING DIVISION July 1, 2005 Prepared for Port of Edmonds Edmonds, Washington LANDAU 14 ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 778-0907 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND ANALYSIS 2.1 EXPLORATION LOCATION AND SAMPLE COLLECTION 2.1.1 Edmonds Marsh 2.1.2 Southeast of Remediation Area I 2.2 ANALYTICAL TESTING METHODS 3.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 3.1 SAMPLE DESIGNATION 3.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURES 3.2.1 Edmonds Marsh 3.2.2 Southeast of Remediation Area I 3.3 GLOBAL POSITIONING SURVEY 3.4 SAMPLE LABELING, SHIPPING AND CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 3.5 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 3.5.1 Edmonds Marsh 3.5.2 Area Southeast of Remediation Area I 3.6 RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT 4.0 SCHEDULE 5.0 REFERENCES LIST OF FIGURES Eiggre Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Proposed Soil Boring Locations — Edmonds Marsh Impact Assessment 3 Proposed Exploration Trench. Locations Southeast of Remediation Area I LIST OF TABLES Table Title 1 Sample Collection and Analysis Summary LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Title A Health and Safety Plan Page 1-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-2 2-2 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-2 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-4 3-4 <O1 5-1 07/01/05 SAWPROC\173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh—SAP-Revised.doc ii LANDAu ASSOCIATES 1 I 1 n t 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION This sampling and analysis plan (SAP) describes the procedures that will be employed to conduct the field sampling and laboratory analytical components of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination investigation located at the Harbor Square complex and an adjacent marsh area. The site is located in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). During the period from August 2004 to February 2005, Landau Associates conducted a remedial action consisting of the excavation and offsite removal of petroleum -impacted soils, debris, and free - phase petroleum hydrocarbons (Landau Associates 2005). Petroleum -impacted soils, debris, and free - phase petroleum hydrocarbons were observed in the sidewall of the excavation that bordered the Edmonds Marsh at a depth of approximately 7 to 8 ft below ground surface (BGS). In addition, petroleum -impacted soil was observed in the sidewall at the southeastern extent of Remediation Area I at a depth of approximately 6 ft BGS. Further excavation in to the Edmonds Marsh was not conducted due to the potential for water in the marsh to drain into the excavation and further excavation to the southeast of Remediation Area I was not conducted to limit disruptions to nearby businesses. Landau Associates plans to conduct additional subsurface assessment to determine the extent to which the petroleum impacts and free -phase petroleum hydrocarbons at the southern border of Remediation Area I extend out into the marsh and to attempt to determine the nature and extent of subsurface petroleum impacts to the southeast of Remediation Area I. The assessment is expected to include the advancement of approximately 10 soil borings in the marsh with proposed soil boring locations shown on Figure 2. Soil boring locations will be limited to the "dry" areas of the marsh. Actual soil boring locations and number of samples may be adjusted, based on field conditions (i.e., surface water elevation in the marsh and soil saturation) and the extent of petroleum impacts (if encountered). It is expected that a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 20 samples will be collected for laboratory analysis. The additional assessment to the southeast of Remediation Area I will be conducted by completing a series of "test trenches" for the purpose of collecting soil samples (Figure 3). Test trenches are being used instead of soil borings due to the somewhat discontinuous nature of the petroleum impacts observed during the August 2004 to February 2005 remedial action. Based on the conditions observed during trenching activities and analytical results of verification soil samples, excavation of the test trench assessment area may immediately follow trenching activities. The assessment activities will occur after necessary permits are acquired and the marsh is sufficiently dry to allow for personnel and sampling equipment to enter the area. The remainder of this document presents sample collection procedures (Section 2.0), field procedures (Section 3.0), a tentative schedule (Section 4.0), and references (Section 5.0). The project Health and Safety Plan is presented as Appendix A. 1 07/01/06 SAWPROCU73\025\015\Edmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 1-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1 fl t 2.0 SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND ANALYSIS Proposed sample collection locations are shown on Figure 2 (Edmonds Marsh) and on Figure 3 (southeast of Remediation Area I). In conjunction with the preparation of the SAP, Landau Associates will schedule a private utility locate contractor for the site to identify potential subsurface utilities that may be located within the planned assessment area. Following the location of subsurface utilities, Landau Associates will identify sampling locations in the Edmonds Marsh using survey stakes and test trenches located southeast of Remediation Area I using spray paint. Sample locations in the test trenches southeast of Remediation Area I will be determined in the field. The number of samples to be collected and the chemical analyses to be performed on each sample are described below. 2.1 EXPLORATION LOCATION AND SAMPLE COLLECTION 2.1.1 EDMONDS MARSH If possible, a hand auger will be used to collect soil samples for laboratory analysis. If soil samples cannot effectively be collected using a hand auger (i.e., too great of a vacuum is induced preventing the successful extraction of the hand auger from the marsh soils), then a small direct -push (i.e., jackhammer) unit will be used to drive direct -push probe rods into the soil. Soil borings will extend to approximately 3 to 10 ft BGS, depending on subsurface conditions encountered in the field. The final locations of the borings may be adjusted in the field, based on conditions in the marsh. The advancement of all borings will be monitored and recorded by a Landau Associates field representative. A record of the soil and groundwater conditions will be maintained in a boring log. The boring log will show sampling depths, sampling methods, sample recoveries, soil types, stratifications, any evidence of contamination observed during drilling, and other information pertinent to the investigation. Each boring log will also identify the name of the drilling company and operator(s), the type of drilling equipment, starting and finishing dates for drilling, boring number, and boring location. Soil types will be described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Field analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the composite samples will be completed using a photoionization detector (PID). We anticipate that one soil sample from each boring will be selected for laboratory analysis, based on field screening results and physical evidence. Boring locations will be surveyed to establish their horizontal position using differential global positioning system (DGPS) equipment. 07/01/05 SAWPRCQ17=25\015\Edmonds Marsh—SAP-Revised.doc 2-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2.1.2 SOUTHEAST OF REMEDIATION AREA I Landau Associates personnel will collect soil samples from the sidewalls and base of test trenches. Test trenches will extend to approximately 8 to 12 ft BGS, depending on subsurface conditions encountered in the field. The final locations of the trenches may be adjusted in the field. The excavation of all test trenches will be monitored and recorded by a Landau Associates field representative. All field activities, including soil removal and soil sampling, will be documented and managed by project oversight personnel in appropriate forms and in field notebooks. A record of the soil and groundwater conditions will be maintained in field notebooks. The field notebook will show sampling depths, soil types, stratifications, any evidence of contamination observed during drilling, and other information pertinent to the investigation. Soil types will be described in accordance with the USCS. Field analysis of VOCs in the soil samples will be completed using a PID. In addition, stockpile characterization samples will be collected from the excavated soil stockpiles. Stockpile characterization samples will be collected to verify that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations are in the excavated soil, if excavated soil is to be disposed off site, and to justify disposal methods for the impacted material. 2.2 ANALYTICAL TESTING METHODS For purposes of this SAP, we have anticipated that a maximum of 15 samples will be collected from the Edmonds Marsh investigation and 30 samples will be collected from the test trenches southeast of Remediation Area I. Samples will be analyzed by the laboratory for gasoline -range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-G) using Method NWTPH-Gx; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8021; and diesel- and lube oil -range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-D and TPH-O) using Method NWTPH-Dx. A sample collection and analysis summary is presented in Table 1. Samples will be delivered to CCI Laboratories located in Everett, Washington for laboratory analysis. 07/01/05 SAWPR0CU73\025\015\Edmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 2-2 LANDAU ASSOc1ATES ' 11 3.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 3.1 SAMPLE DESIGNATION Designations of samples collected from exploration locations in the Edmonds Marsh will be preceded with the prefix "HA" for hand auger or "DP" for direct -push, and numerically sequenced. Designations of samples collected from each hand auger exploration will receive a suffix denoting the top of the 1-ft depth interval from which it was collected. For example, HA-3-7 will represent the sample collected from hand auger exploration number 3 beginning at a depth of 7 to 8 ft BGS. Samples collected from each direct -push exploration will receive a suffix denoting the top of the 2-ft depth interval from which it was collected. For example, DP-2-4 will represent the sample collected from direct -push exploration number 2 beginning at a depth of 4 to 6 ft BGS. Samples collected from a test trench will be identified using the following naming convention: Example: LAI-SW3-TT1-4 LAI: Landau Associates, Inc. SW3: Sample is the 3`d sidewall sample collected in the test trench ("Floor" similarly used for samples collected from the base of the trench). TT 1: Sample collected from test trench 1. 4: The depth (in feet) at which the sample was collected. 3.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURES Samples will be selected for chemical analyses based on field screening results (i.e., PID, olfactory, and visual observation). If field screening results indicate no obvious signs of contamination, then the sample interval directly above the water table may be selected for analysis. Samples will be collected directly from a hand auger head, a direct -push sample sleeve, or a backhoe bucket using a decontaminated stainless steel spoon. The samples will then be placed directly into laboratory -supplied containers. Each jar will be labeled as described in Section 3.1 of this report. The specific sample collection equipment is described below: 3.2.1 EDMONDS MARSH The hand augers to be used at the site will consist of a 3/a-inch diameter metal rod with an open- ended metal cylinder auger head attached to the bottom and a metal handle attached to the top. The auger will be advanced or extracted by rotating the handle clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively. The direct -push samplers to be used at the site will consist of an outer cylindrical steel casing (approximately 07/01/05 SAWPROMI73\025\01Mdmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 3-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1 2 inches in diameter) with a dedicated polyethylene sample sleeve inside. The sampler will be advanced into soils using a jackhammer or roto-hammer and extracted with a small, portable hydraulic jack. The footprint of the jack will be approximately 1.5 ft by 1.5 ft. Supports (i.e., 2-inch by 4-inch lumber) will be used to prevent the jack from sinking into the marsh while the sampler section is being retrieved. The sleeve will be extracted from the sampler once the sampler section is retrieved from the boring. The contents of the hand auger head or direct -push sample sleeve will be field -screened for VOCs using a PID. The resulting PID reading, soil descriptions, and drilling observations will be recorded by the Landau Associates field personnel on a boring log. 3.2.2 SOUTHEAST OF REMEDIATION AREA I Soil samples will be collected from approximately 0 to 6 inches into the sidewall and base at each sample location using a stainless steel spoon or hand auger, or from the excavator bucket when gaining access to sample locations could be a personal safety hazard. If soil is collected from the excavator bucket, care will be taken to collect the sample from the least disturbed soil not in direct contact with the excavator bucket. Approximately one soil sample will be collected per every 50 linear ft of sidewall and one at the base of each trench. Actual sample locations may vary depending on field conditions encountered. The final sample collection locations will be recorded on a map prepared by personnel collecting the soil samples. Samples will be field screened for VOCs using a PID. The resulting PID reading, soil descriptions, and drilling observations will be recorded by the Landau Associates field personnel in a field notebook. A City of Edmonds active water supply main extends southeast to northwest through the investigation area that the test trenches will be excavated, as seen on Figure 3. Excavation of test trenches near the water main may become a safety hazard due to the high pressure in the water main. During the August 2004 to February 2005 remedial action, construction personnel installed isolation valves at two points along the water main to isolate a portion of the water main. Prior to test trenching, this portion of the water main will be isolated to allow for future excavation without disruption of the potable water supply. 3.3 GLOBAL POSITIONING SURVEY Sample locations will be surveyed to establish their horizontal position using the Global Positioning System. 1 r 1 07/01/05 S:\WPROC\173\025W15\Edmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 3-2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES ' 3.4 SAMPLE LABELING, SHIPPING AND CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY ' Sample container labels will be completed immediately before or immediately following sample collection. Container labels will include the following information: • Project name • Project number ' • Sample identification • Initials of the person collecting the sample • Date and time of collection ' • Analysis requested. Samples will be transported to the designated analytical laboratory using the following procedures: • Samples will be placed on ice in a sealed cooler immediately after collection • Each sample container will be individually packed in bubble wrap when placed in the cooler • The samples will be sent by courier to the analytical laboratory by Landau Associates ' • All samples submitted for analysis will be accompanied by a Chain -of -Custody form. ' 3.5 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 3.5.1 EDMONDS MARSH ' All sampling equipment will be fully decontaminated before use and in between sample ' collections. If direct -push drilling methods are necessary, hydrocarbon absorbent drip pads will be placed in areas where there could be potential drips of hydrocarbons. Landau Associates and drilling personnel will have a spill kit at the site in the event of a discharge of hydraulic fluid, oil, or fuel. Sampling equipment (spoons and bowls) will be placed into 5-gal buckets directly after use. These buckets will be transported out of the marsh by Landau Associates personnel where wet ' decontamination methods will be used to minimize the possibility of cross -contamination. Down -the - hole drilling equipment (augers or probes with soil sampling sleeves) will also be transported out of the ' marsh and decontaminated using wet decontamination methods prior to each sample interval. Wet decontamination procedures are as follows: ' • Wash equipment with Alconox/tap water solution. (If heavy -oil free product is encountered, aninitial hexane/methanol rinse may be used to remove the residuals from the equipment.) 07/01/05 SAWPAOM173\02SOMEdmonds Marsh_SAP-Revised.doc 3-3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES • Rinse with tap water • Rinse with de -ionized water • Repeat entire procedure or any parts of the procedure as necessary • Disposable gloves will be changed between each sampling location. 3.5.2 AREA SOUTHEAST OF REMEDIATION AREA I Prior to commencement of trenching activities, work zones will be established to designate areas for specific tasks. The work zones will include: the exclusion zone, the contamination reduction zone (which encompasses an equipment decontamination zone and a personnel decontamination zone), and the support zone. Preliminary identification of these various zones is indicated on Figure 3. The exclusion zone will include the area encompassing the proposed test trenches and the contamination reduction zone, as indicated on Figure 3. Only site personnel with proper training and equipped in appropriate personal protective equipment will be permitted to enter the exclusion zone after reviewing and signing the health and safety plan (HASP) prepared by Landau Associates (Appendix A). The exclusion zone will be demarcated with caution tape during trenching activities. The support zone will consist of the remainder of the site used for ingress and egress for the site and will remain accessible to the public during the removal action. 3.6 RESIDUALS MANAGEMENT Soil and water generated during the sample collection and any decontamination processes will be contained in 5-gal buckets then transferred to 55-gal drums. Drums will be temporarily stored on Port of Edmonds property pending analytical results. Landau Associates will arrange for the disposal of generated waste water and soil. Disposable clothing and equipment will be placed in plastic bags and disposed as solid waste in an appropriate solid waste facility. Residual soils will be characterized by the analytical results of soil samples. 07/01/05 SAWPROG7173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 3-4 LANDAu AssocIATES r] 1 4.0 SCBEDULE Sampling activities in the Edmonds Marsh and trenching activities in the area southeast of Remediation Area I are scheduled to occur, if site conditions allow, in summer 2005; however, this schedule is subject to change based on the weather. Potential flooding in the marsh could prevent successful access to the marsh and recovery of soil samples. Additionally, a high groundwater table in ' the surrounding subsurface could cause significant difficulties to excavating test trenches and to the recovery of soil samples. F 7 LEI 07/01/05 SAWPROCW31025\015\Edmonds Marsh_SAP•Revised.doc 4-1 tANDAu ASSOCIATES 5.0 REFERENCES Landau Associates. 2005. Revised Soil Remediation Summary Report, Harbor Square Complex, Edmonds, Washington. Prepared for Port of Edmonds. June 1. 1 07/01/05 SAWPROM17302510151Edmonds Marsh SAP-Revised.doc 5-1 LANDAU ASSOCIATES � T 187TH ST-SW is ✓ r i ' 166TH sT Sv—Perrinville -- "9�SW T`I1190TH ;T SW Si 189T —� SW__ J� �g13t� 191STPLSW �PS492NDS190T p� W FORE T DELL SS I Ngd� 194TH PL SW T95TN LSW CELSIOR J —� `� t 524 o--C1 196TH ST SW I 524 i l zPA f ' W� n Z ¢ Q c PEAS a I W ? pO2N Q ROLWAY gWH/� o SIERRA = $TSW 02N' PLO, I ri SR 10.4 i LEN EY z _ - utSo�rtd ch ' toll m < ' Z \ 104 EDMONDS. m 524 207 PL SW y ECf[itond MAI ; 6 one Ric ge F - r'k l x m AP C' c �— y� AD RD e� �ONry D I WALNJT- D �� a 2 T PL S CA (LEDA 21b TH S S UN S U w sky 4T S / l� RD Project m 214TH S Op H ,2T TH P T Ward Int PIN Location -4 0 '� 2 6 H S SW S M HRD <m<m HP W ` 21 T P 18TH ST S to y V1 21 T BE COO �q �? L 104 N m p. OTH T S 1 ro BI CH SW m 1ST L S aJ I O se ake CO 0 Y 41H S S 24 SW rn N SVV AL NQUIN RD m H STSW x 226 H ST 3W PL m 28T 228 H S SW r Tfr- O 9 429 PL W tr SW 104 SW 31 32N T W 1s 0T P W P S HOLLY ACHUSETT D 2 4 H S SW 233RD P SW 35T S S MADRO 235TH PL S 2 6 S S 235TH L SW 99 236TH P SW sw t Map from DeLorme Street Atlas USA, 2002 m E OD Project Qo Location Edmonds ''DOkc 1 a � �Tacon�a s 0 %2 1 Scale in Miles Washington it ' Harbor Square Figure LANDAU Edmonds, Washington Vicinity Map q ASSOCIATES I i N Raised Wood Plank Walk m / Edmonds o F + 190 W Dayton Street (Building 1) i iF + F + / RW-3 9 RW-2 / RW-1 \ ham• / ,. W Dayton Street �� > ,�` �� /,• (Building 4) I Legend �f-- -- j — Remediation Area I Boundary / % ® Proposed Boring Locations 170 W Dayton Street MW-3 �� > \ (Building 5) Recovery Well Monitoring Well LAI-SW8-RA1 6 / ® Approximate Location Soil Sample a with Visible Product or TPH-D or ' LAISWI8-RA1-8 TPH-O Concentrations At or Above a,-SWI9-RA1$ /+ 2,000 mg/kg LAI-SW20-RA1-8/ I Approximate Location Soil Sample Marsh ® RW-4 LAI-SW22-RAl-7 with TPH-D and TPH-O Observation �� Q �\ *� Concentrations Below Deck ® ® 2,000 mg/kg, but with TPH-G ® \ \ Concentrations Above 30 mg/kg or LL i / Marsh u \ � u I not Detected at a Detection Limit Greater than 30 mg/kg Underground Communication Utility cli L Vault 160 W Dayton Street (Harbor Square o Catch Basin i \ Athletic Club) Gate Valve a Property Line \ ® Water Meter E u Storm Drain O Notes W_ Water Supply Line N u 1. Black and white reproduction of this color Fire Hydrant original may reduce its effectiveness and O Manhole m v lead to incorrect interpretation. Y % — Fence N u 1 v 2. All locations are approximate. e x LANDAU ASSOCIATES 0 60 120 Harbor Square Proposed Soil Boring Locations Figure Scale in Feet Edmonds, Washington Edmonds Marsh Impact Assessment 2 m LL Q Raised Wood Plank Walk U ma E ,li -010 o 0 x m Q LANDAU ASSOCIATES ILI W Dayton Street 120 W Dayton Street (Building 2) 160 W Dayton Street (Harbor Square Athletic Club) 0 60 120 Scale in Feet C Legend \� - - - - - - Exclusion Zone —x— Contamination Reduction Zone Support Zone — — — Remediation Area I Boundary Proposed Exploration Trench Recovery Well Monitoring Well M Underground Communication Utility Vault o Catch Basin w Gate Valve ® Water Meter —s�— Storm Drain — w — Water Supply Line — — Sanitary Sewer — Telephone/Communication — — Natural Gas Notes I — — Electrical Power 1. Black and white reproduction of this color O Fire Hydrant original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. O Manhole 2. All locations are approximate. — — x Fence Proposed Exploration Figure Harbor Square Trench Locations Edmonds, Washington 3 Southeast of Remediation Area I Page 1 of 1 TABLE 1 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY HARBOR SQUARE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Area # of Samples Collected Analytes Analyses Edmonds Up to 15 TPH-D and TPH-O NWTPH-Dx Marsh TPH-G NWTPH-Gx BTEX EPA 8021 Southeast of Up to 30 TPH-D and TPH-O NWTPH-Dx Remediation TPH-G NWTPH-Gx Area 1 BTEX EPA 8021 07/01/05 SAWPR0Q173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh SAP_tb1-Revised.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 1 of 15 rLANDAU ASSOCIATES i DWRONMeM I GEOMC is CA I MUM W—XU Es WORK LOCATION PERSONNEL PROTECTION AND SAFETY EVALUATION FORM Attach Pertinent Documents/Data Fill in Blanks As Appropriate Job No.: 173025.010.015 Prepared by: David Nelson Reviewed by: Martin Powers Date: June 3, 2005 Date: June 7, 2005 A.: WORK LOCATION DESCRIPTION 1. Project Name: Harbor Square; Marsh Impact Assessment. 2. Location: Northern extent of the Edmonds Marsh near 170 and 180 West Dayton Street, and south-southeast of 170 West Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. ' 3. Anticipated Activities: Soil sampling in the marsh using hand auger or direct -push drilling techniques. 4. Size: Edmonds Marsh: Proposed borings are anticipated to be advanced within a 3,000 square foot (ft2 )area of the marsh. Area Southeast of Remediation Area I: Proposed test trenches are anticipated to be advanced within a 4,200 ft2 area. 5. Surrounding Population: North: Commercial business park followed by West Dayton Street. South: Edmonds Marsh East: Commercial business park followed by State Route 104 West: Burlington Northern/Santa Fe Railroad property followed by the Port of Edmonds. ' 6. Buildings/Homes/Industry: None. 7. Topography: Generally flat (marsh). 8. Anticipated Weather: Field work to be conducted following approximately 2 weeks of dry weather in order to achieve and maintain low-water conditions. I� 9. Unusual Features: Marshland. 10. Site History: A portion of the Edmonds Marsh was formerly used as farmland. O6/15/05 SAWPR=173\025\015\Ednands Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 2 of 15 B. HAZARD DESCRIPTION 1. Background Review: ® Complete ❑ Partial If partial, why? 2. Hazardous Level: ❑ B ❑ C ® D ❑ Unknown Justification: 3. Types of Hazards: (Attach additional sheets as necessary) A. ® Chemical ® Inhalation ❑ Explosive ® Biological ® Ingestion ❑ 02 Def. ❑ Skin Contact Describe: Exposure to chemical hazards from petroleum products. Nitrile gloves will be worn. B. ® Physical ❑ Cold Stress ® Noise ❑ Heat Stress ❑ Other Describe: Edmonds Marsh Noise from jackhammer. Physical hazards from walking around in the marsh. Hard hats will be worn. Ear protection will be used. Steel -toed boots will be worn at all times due to heavy object hazards. Area Southeast of Remediation Area 1 Excavator activities, noise from excavator and dump trucks. Physical hazards from traffic, equipment, may be encountered during trenching activities. Hard hats will be worn. Ear protection will be used. Steel -toed boots will be worn at all times due to heavy object hazards. Potential trip and fall hazards associated with excavation. C. ❑ Radiation Describe: 4. Nature of Hazards: ® Air Describe: Exposure to possible volatile organic components of petroleum hydrocarbons is possible. Breathing zone vapors will be analyzed with a photoionization detector. ® Soil Describe: Exposure to possible volatile organic components of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil. ❑ Surface Water Describe: ® Groundwater Describe: Exposure to possible volatile organic components of petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater. ❑ Other Describe: 06/15/05 SAWPROM171025\015\Edmonds Marsh_HASP.doc L.ANDAu ASSOCIATES I Page 3 of 15 5. Chemical Contaminants of Concern ❑ N/A Instruments Used to PEL I.D.L.H. Source/Quantity Symptoms of Acute Monitor Contaminant (ppm) (ppm) Characteristics Route of Exposure Exposure Contaminant Benzene 1 ppm 5 ppm Soil at unknown Inhalation, ingestion, Irritated eyes, skin, PID meter concentrations absorption, and skin nose, and respiratory Draeger or eye contact system; giddiness; tubes headache; nausea; Combustible staggered gait; Gas Indicator dermatitis; fatigue; (CGI). anorexia; lassitude; bone marrow depressant. (carcinogenic) Toluene 100 150 Soil and groundwater Inhalation, ingestion, Headache; dizziness; PID meter ppm ppm at unknown percutaneous drowsiness; concentrations absorption, and skin coordination and eye contact problems; and coma Xylene 100 150 Soil and groundwater Inhalation, ingestion, Nervous system PID meter ppm ppm at unknown percutaneous depression; liver and concentrations absorption, and skin kidney damage Ethylbenzene Notes: 100 125 Soil and groundwater ppm ppm at unknown concentrations and eye contact Inhalation, ingestion, percutaneous absorption, and skin and eye contact Nervous system PID meter depression; headaches; dizziness; nausea; convulsions; and coma 06/15/05 S:\WPRCQ173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 4 of 15 6. Physical Hazards of Concern ❑ N/A Procedures Used to Hazard Description Location Monitor Hazard Difficult terrain Soft soils in Edmonds Marsh Edmonds Marsh Use of buddy -system and cellular create potential to get stuck phones 0611W05 SAWPROG1173\025\0151EdmondsMarsh_HASP.doc M r =a = M M LANDAU ASSOCIATES = O Ni � w r M M tm M, s M M Page 5 of 15 7. Work Location Instrument Readings ❑ N/A Location: Percent 02: Radioactivity: FID: Other: Other: Location: Percent 02: Radioactivity: FID: Other: Other: Percent LEL: PID: Other: Other: Other: Percent LEL: PID: Other: Other: Other: Location: Percent 02: Percent LEL: Radioactivity: PID: FID: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Location: Percent 02: Radioactivity: FID: Other: Other: Percent LEL: PID: Other: Other: Other: 8. Hazards Expected In Preparation For Work Assignment ❑ N/A Describe: 06/15/05 SAWPRO0171025\015Tdmonds Marsh_HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 6 of 15 C. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT 1. Level of Protection ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ® D Location/Activity: Soil sample collection ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D Location/Activity. 2. Protective Equipment (specify probable quantity required) Respirator ❑ N/A Clothing ® N/A ❑ SCBA, Airline ❑ Fully Encapsulating Suit ❑ Full -Face Respirator ❑ Chemically Resistant Splash Suit ® Half -Face Respirator (Cart. organic ❑ Apron, Specify: vapor) (Only if upgrade to Level C per Attachment 1) ❑ Escape mask ❑ Tyvek Coverall ❑ None ❑ Saranex Coverall ❑ Other: ❑ Coverall, Specify ❑ Other: ❑ Other: Head & Eve ❑ N/A ® Hard Hat ❑ Goggles ❑ Face Shield ® Safety Eyeglasses ❑ Other: Hand Protection ❑ N/A ® Undergloves; Type: ❑ Gloves; Type: ❑ Overgloves; Type: ❑ None ❑ Other: Foot Protection ❑ N/A ❑ Neoprene Safety Boots with Steel Toe/Shank ❑ Disposable Overboots ® Other: Steel -toed boots 06/15/05 S1WPROMI73\025\015\Edmonds Marsh_HASP.dx LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 7 of 15 3. Monitoring Equipment ❑ N/A ® CGI ® PID ❑ OZ Meter ❑ FID ❑ Rad Survey ❑ Other ❑ Detector Tubes (optional) Type: D. DECONTAMINATION _ PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION ® Required ❑ Not Required EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION ® Required ❑ Not Required 06M5105 SAMR00173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh_HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 8 of 15 , If required, describe: Edmonds Marsh Soil sampling equipment (spoons and bowls) will placed into 5-gal buckets directly after use. These buckets will be transported out of the marsh by Landau Associates personnel where wet decontamination methods will be used to minimize the possibility of cross -contamination. Down -the - hole drilling equipment (augers or probes with soil sampling sleeves) will also be transported out of the marsh and decontaminated using wet decontamination methods prior to each sample interval. Wet decontamination procedures are as follows: • Wash equipment with Alconox/tap water solution. (If heavy -oil free product is encountered, an initial hexane/methanol rinse may be used to remove the residuals from the equipment.) • Rinse with tap water. • Rinse with de -ionized water. • Repeat entire procedure or any parts of the procedure as necessary. • Disposable gloves will be changed between each sampling location. Area Southeast of Remediation Area I Soil sampling equipment (spoons and bowls) will be decontaminated using wet decontamination methods to minimize the possibility of cross -contamination. Dry decontamination procedures will be used for the excavator between excavation of each trench. Dry decontamination methods will use a stiff brush and/or broom to remove soil from the excavator. If saturated soil conditions are encountered, then wet decontamination procedures may be used to decontaminate the excavator. If heavy -oil free product is encountered, an initial hexane/methanol rinse may be used to remove the residuals from the equipment. Wet decontamination procedures are as follows: • Wash equipment with Alconox/tap water solution. (If heavy -oil free product is encountered, an initial hexane/methanol rinse may be used to remove the residuals from the equipment.) • Rinse with tap water. • Rinse with de -ionized water. • Repeat entire procedure or any parts of the procedure as necessary. • Disposable gloves will be changed between each sampling location. 1 it 1 1 1 1 1 06/15/05 SAWPROM171025\015\Edmonds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES I Page 9 of 15 & PERSONNEL Medical Fit Test Name Work Location Title/Task Current Current 1. Martin Powers Project Manager/P.E. 2. David Nelson Staff Geologist 3. ❑ ❑ 4. ❑ ❑ 5. ❑ ❑ 6. ❑ ❑ 7. ❑ ❑ 8. ❑ ❑ 9. ❑ ❑ 10. ❑ ❑ Site Safety Coordinator: David Nelson 06/15/05 S:\WPROC\173\025\015\EdffiondsMarsh—HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 10 of 15 F. ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THIS PLAN Task No. Description Preliminary Schedule 015 Soil investigation June 2005 06/15/05 S:\WPROC\173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh_HASP.dx LANDAU AssocIATES Page 11 of 15 G. SUBCONTRACTOR'S HEALTH. AND SAFETY PROG.RAM'EVALUATION-❑ N/A Name and Address of Subcontractor: Cascade Drilling EVALUATION CRITERIA Item Adequate Inadequate Comments Medical Surveillance Program ❑ ❑ Personal Protective Equipment Availability ❑ ❑ Onsite Monitoring Equipment Availability ❑ ❑ Safe Working Procedures Specification ❑ ❑ Training Protocols ❑ ❑ Ancillary Support Procedures (if any) ❑ ❑ Emergency Procedures ❑ ❑ Evacuation Procedures Contingency Plan ❑ ❑ Decontamination Procedures Equipment ❑ ❑ Decontamination Procedures Personnel ❑ ❑ GENERAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PROGRAM EVALUATION: ❑ Adequate ❑ Inadequate Additional Comments: Landau Associates Basic Agreement in place with Cascade Drilling — copy on file Evaluation Conducted By: Date: 06/15/05 S:%WPROC%173102W15XEdmonds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 12 of 15 ' EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND NUMBERS Hospital: Stevens Memorial Hospital 21601 76`s Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Directions: See Map and Directions to Hospital (Attachment 2) Telephone: (425) 640-4000 Emergency Transportation Systems (Fire, Police, Ambulance) — 911 Emergency Routes — See Map and Directions to Hospital (Attachment 2) Emergency Contacts: Offsite Onsite Martin Powers 425-778-0907 In the event of an emergency, do the following: 1. Call for help as soon as possible. Call 911. Give the following information: • WHERE the emergency is — use cross streets or landmarks • PHONE NUMBER you are calling from • WHAT HAPPENED — type of injury • WHAT is being done for the victim(s) • YOU HANG UP LAST — let the person you called hang up first. 2. If the victim can be moved, paramedics will transport to the hospital. If the injury or exposure is not life threatening, decontaminate the individual first. If decontamination is not feasible, wrap the individual in a blanket or sheet of plastic prior to transport. 7 11 06/1SW SAWPROM173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES I Page 13 of 15 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN APPROVAL/SIGN OFF FORMAT I have read, understood, and agreed with the information set forth in this Health and Safety Plan (and attachments) and discussed in the Personnel Health and Safety briefing. Name Signature Date Name Signature Date Name Signature Date Name Signature Date Signature Date David Nelson Site Safety Coordinator Signature Date Tim Syverson -J Landau Health and Safety Manager Sign re Date Martin Powers Project Manager Signature Date Personnel Health and Safety Briefing Conducted By: Name Signature Date 06/15/05 S:\WPROC\17=25\015\Ed=nds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Page 14 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 ACTION LEVELS FOR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION AS MEASURED WITH A PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR (PID) Monitoring Parameter Reading Level of Protection VOCs >10 ppm and <20 ppm Upgrade to level C half -face respirator VOCs >20 ppm and <100 ppm Upgrade to full -face respirator VOCS >100 ppm Stop work, contact H&S Manager 1 06/15/05 S:\WPROC\173\025\01REdmonds Marsh_HASP.doc tANDAu ASSOCIATES I Page 15 of 15 Directions 1: x- 3: 4: 5: 6: ATTACHMENT 2 MAP TO HOSPITAL Start out going EAST on W DAYTON ST toward SUNSET AVE/WA-104. Turn LEFT onto SUNSET AVE/WA-104. Turn RIGHT onto MAIN ST/WA-524. Continue to follow MAIN ST Distance 0.1 miles 0.1 miles 1.8 miles Turn SLIGHT LEFT onto 212TH ST SW. 0.5 miles Turn RIGHT onto 76TH AVE W. 0.2 miles End at 21601 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026-7507, US Total Est. Time: 9 minutes Total Est. Distance: 2.88 miles 06/15/05 SAWPROC\173\025\015\Edmonds Marsh HASP.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES CITY OF E13MONDS HARVE H. HARRISON 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMON06. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 16, 1979 J. D. Zirkle Dept. of Transportation 6431 Corson Ave. So. Seattle, Wa. 98108 Attn: Mr. Cleary, Traffic Engr. Gentlemen: Subject: .ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR PORT OF EDMONDS Submitted herewith for your review is the draft Environ- mental Impact Statement for the Port of Edmonds. Please review and return your comments to the Engineering Department. vlw JF16- fL `15 Adams dt. Yo rs very truly, FRED F. HERZBERG, P.E. Director of Public Works STREE-'r FILE r June 14, 1979 MEMO TO: Community Development � � Department ET FROM: Fred F. Herzberg, P.E. City Engineer FILE SUBJECT: PROPOSED REZONE R-4-79, INDUSTRIAL PARK In.reviewing the subject proposal, the Public Works Depart- ment recommends that several sections of the Environmental Checklist form be addressed for approval by the City, prior to the Planning Commission Hearing.as follows: A Traffic Engineer should study the impact of the expected number of vehicular trips in relation to the traffic circulation and safety in the immediate.down- town business area. Response to Section 3b is in conflict with 16e; this should be explained.. WJN : FFII : j ak 4k- m. n t. P.W. Dir. t. i Property Owners Within 80 Feet Union Oil Company - 11720 Unoco Road, Edmonds 98020 Suhrbier Management and Div. Company,.-1.8.1-8—Wes.t.la`ke North, Seattle, Wa. 981o9 State of Washington - Olympia Burlington Northern Railroad Company - 8'10 3rd Avenue, Seattle 98101 SrReerFae STAFF? Fj�E ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Port of Edmonds 2. Address and Phone Number o.f Proponent: 456 Admiral Way Edmonds, Washington 98020 _Phone - 774-0549 3. Date Checklist Submitted-: May 2.1. 197 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Edmonds 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Port of Edmonds Business Park 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal including but not limited to its size, general des.ign elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding.of its scope and nature): Contract Rezone to General Commercial From Industrial Park See Attached 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of t e pro- posal, as well as the extent.of the land.area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to dive an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the p i-opos a 1) : Southwest corner of SR-104 and Dayton Avenue intersection. The site is north of the Union Oil Marshland 8. Estima.teil Date for Completion of the Proposal.: 1981 ). Ll,t of ,I I Perri Is, Licenses or GovernmunI Approv�jIs Rcguior the Pr„I)(,,rl ((cde. raI, stele arrd local -- including rezones): Contract Rezone, Building Permit 10• Do you h<:Ive any plans for future additions, expans ion, 'or further - act ivity rclat.ed to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No I I. Do you hrl0w of any plants by ol.hurs which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. At toch jury other apl,l icat ion form that has been completed rcclrrrd- inor nonu has bi•en comp l c• t d, br.rt i cxpe •d trr he - I i Itrd ;ri ,um(! future date, describe Lhe nature of such appl ic•rLion I orm: I I . ENV I RONMEN I'Al. 'I FIPACTS (Exl)lanaticros of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (I) Earth. Will. the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x (b) DI,ruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? x (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features"? x (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soi Is, ei tier on or off the si te? x Yes Maybe No i n depos i t i on or e ros ion of he-ach ill s I I t at Inn, depos I t Ii)n of I u•5 i un wh i ch iil,ly mod i I y Lhle cIIaIll e`I o f a r i vc r or Strotjm or the bed or Lllc ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x ExplanaLion: See attached (?) Air. Will Lhe proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of amblent air duality: X (h) The creation of objectionable odors: x ( .) AltL'ratic>r1 of el I- nlovenient, moisture: or to^.rllperdture, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: SPP at tarhPri (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in curren is , or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? x (h) CII.)nge5 in a bsorption.rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff"? X (c) Alterations to the course of flow of f Iood w<,te:rs? x (d) Ch II)ge in the amount of surface water . in any w,)Le r body? x (c) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including bl-lI not limited to temperature, (Iis5ulved oxygen or turbidity? x Yes Maybe No (f) AItc-,ration of the di reel ion or rate of Flow nl gr()r,nd warers? x (��) Ch,rn lc in Llic qu�nri ty of ground walrus, i 0101- lhr-ou(lh di rect addi rions or wi t:hdrawals, r Ihrou,llr interc.el)tiOil of an ayr.rifer I)y cuts ur cx.c.,jvaI i ons? x (h) Dt-tcrioratioil in clround water quality, ei Ilii:r through di reel inject ion, or throuclh tht! set!page ol- Ieachate, phosphates, detergents, wcluerburne yr rus or bacteria, or other sub- I,ur into the ground w,3ters? lu:l iun in the arlrOLrrlt of water..oLher - wise available for public water supplies? _x Explanation: See attached (4) Flora. Wi1I the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including Irks, shrul>s, grass, crops, microI-Iora and (b) Reduc:Lion of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replc.nishnrcnt at' existing species? x (d) Red1.rct ion in acreage of. any agricul Lural c rop? x Explanation: _ See attached (`>) Fnrill, i. (Jill the proposal result in: (a) Chal)(Jes in the diversity of species, or Yes Maybe NO nunihur', of dny slXr.cies of fauna (Birds, Bind an ima Is including reptiles, fish and shellfish, hC. 'mO,ini-im,ti, insects or micro- Fauna)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? x GO Deterioration to .existing fish or wi ill i fe habi tat.? x Explanation: See attached (G) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: See attached (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new Iight.or glare? x Explanation: See attached (8) Lund Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? x Explanation: See attached Yes Maybe No (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resour,cesl x (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the eveia of an accident or upset conditions? x. Explanation: I (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area: x Explanation:, (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect.existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular nio ve me n It '1 x (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? A_ (c) Impact upon existing transportation s y s terns? x (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulatic,n or movement of people and/or goods? x (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor' vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? CxpIanatiun: See Attached (14) Pub is Services. Will 'the proposal have an effect upon, or result'in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the . following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? x (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational faci I i ties? x (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x (f) Other governmental ,services? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) of- substantial amounts of fuel or ene rJY? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? x Explanation: 0 6) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or, natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c), Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: x x x x x x (17) Human Health.. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding men.tal.health)? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to: th;e:..publ i c, or wi l l the proposal result in the creation of .an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x Explanation: See Attached (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality.or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: See Attached (20) Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical"site, structure, object or building? X Explanation: III. SIGNATURE X_ I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above inforination is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: rti 0 . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SUPPLAftNT 1. BACKGROUND 6) Description of Proposal The proposed rezone will allow limited retail/commercial uses associated with marine activities; and those uses allowed under the existing zoning - IP (Industrial Park). Unlike the IP Zone, the rezone woul.d allow manu- facturers to retail their products at the same location. This rezone, and the uses -allowed, is based on the "Port of Edmonds Master Plan" (adopted May 14, 1979). The rezone would implement one of the four basic action elements of the Master Plan: "Develop the Union Oil site as a Commercial Park containing a mix of water -related commercial, and industrial park uses." (p.43) The rezone will allow the Union Oil site to accommodate boat sales and service businesses who require public exposure. Other marine -related commercial businesses would also be allowed. Light industrial uses would be limited to those permitted under the existing zoning, and would probably be limited to marine -related uses and "cottage" type industries. All uses will meet performance standards as specified in the contract, and will meet the Port of Edmonds'.goal of providing a location for marine -related commercial and industrial activities. The existing zone prohibits commercial uses. The rezone will also allow offices to locate on the site. Thereliminar P y:. site plan for the project indicates there will be about 190,000 square feet of industrial park space,.47,500'square feet of retail/commercial space, and 47,500 square feet of office space, fora total of 285,000 square feet of leasable floor space on the site. The major impact of the rezone is to alter the type of use on the site. Under present I-P.zoning the.site could potentially be developed with up to 285,000 square feet of industrial park uses. ` II. ENVIRONMENT/* MPACTS • . (1) EARTH b. The proposal will result in covering the majority of the . site with buildings,and roads. The construction process will disrupt, displace, and compact the existing soil con- ditions. a.The increased traffic resulting from the proposal (see #13) will add pollutants to the atmosphere. (3) WATER b. The proposal will decrease absorption rates of surface water runoff due to non -permeable surfaces. i. The project will use local water supplies. (4) FLORA, AND (5) FAUNA The proposed site is bordered on the south by the Union Oil Marsh. The rezone will not have an adverse impact upon the flora and/or fauna of the Marsh since.there will be no encroachment of any future commercial or in- dustrial use into the marsh or into the natural buffer which will surround the Business Park. The rezone will not affect food chains, nesting areas, or endanger rare species of plants and/or animals. Storm water runoff will be captured on the site and emptied into the City's storm drainage system in Dayton Street. a. The project will necessitate the clearing of all existing ground cover, excluding trees. AUDC _bVF-_F K The project will result in the destruction of Scotch Broom, ground cover, etc. which serve as nesting grounds/habitat of some species of fauna (i.e. birds, rodents, bugs, etc.). (6) NOISE Noise levels will increase due to sounds associated with light manufacturing, and auto traffic. . (7) LIGHT & GLARE On site lighting and car headlights will produce new light and glare. 8) Land Use The proposal will result in the alteration of the present use (open storage in an "Industrial Park" zone) and planned use ("Industrial") of the site. However the contract rezone will allow uses akin to the present zone and Comprehensive Plan designations (light manufacturing), and will also allow some related commercial uses. The proposed alteration of land use is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the site or adjacent land use patterns. Crab pots are currently stored on -site. Adjacent land uses in- clude Safeway to the north; City of Edmonds Sewage Treatment Plant to the east;. Union Oil Marsh to the south; crab pot manufacturing, aluminum boat fabrication, dry boat storage, and other marine -related uses to the west. The on -site uses allowed by the contract rezone may have a beneficial impact upon marine -related land uses located to the west, since they are compatible. 13) Transportation/Circulation a. The traffic impacts can be best illustrated with a comparison between an Industrial Park, with uses as allowed under existing zoning restrictions; and the proposed Business Park, with uses as allowed in the proposed contract rezone. Each alternative assumes 285,000 square feet of gross floor area. Trip generation multipliers used in the analyses below are based on studies published in "Trip generation by Land Use" (Maricopa Association of Governments; April, 1974). Gross floor area is indicated in.units of 1000 square feet. Alternative A - Industrial Park (Existing Zoning) A 285,000 square foot complex would generate approximately 2,656 vehicle trips per day.` The uses associated with this complex; as specified in the zoning restrictions, would be limited to "clean" manufacturing (excludes rendering, canning, smelting, stockyard/slaughter, etc.), wholesale dis- tribution, warehousing and storage, and associated offices. Retail uses are not permitted in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. Many local manufacturers retail their products out of the same location. These businesses would not be permitted to locate in.an industrial park under the existing zoning. Therefore, man of the 2656 vehicle trips will be.newly created by non -local businesses moving intolthe complex. 285(,000) x 9.32 = 2,656 vehicle trips (9.32 is the multiplier for industrial parks, i.e., for each. 1,000 square feet of gross floor area there will be 9.32 daily vehicle trips generated). . Alternative B - Business/Industrial Park (Pro osed Rezone) A 285,000 square foot complex would generate approximately 4588 vehicle trips per day.- The proposed rezone would allow limited retailing, in addition to the industrial uses allowed by the existing IP zone. It would allow existing local manufacturers to retail their products in the.Business/ Industrial Park. The Port of Edmonds leases waterfront properties to private businesses, many of which could relocate to this complex. Therefore, some portion of the 4,588 vehicle trips per day generated by this complex, may be shifted from other areas of the City; the real traffic impact associated with the rezone/business park will probably be less than what the 4,588 vehicle trips indicate. 47,000 square feet of retail space 237,500 square feet of industrial park (includes offices) 285,000 square feet Total floor area 47.5 x 50.0 = 2375 vehicle trips (The 50.0 multiplier is an estimate, based on the "Maricopa" Studies, of the number of daily vehicle trips generated by each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.). 237.5 x 9.32 = 2213 (9.32.is the.industrial park multiplier) 2375 + 2213 = 4588 Total Vehicle Trips Per Day a (13) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION b. The proposal will create a demand for new parking all of which will be satisfied by on -site parking lots. c. The uses allowed under the proposed. Contract Rezone will generate approximately 19.30 more vehicles trips per day than uses under the existing IP zone. Access to the site will be provided directly from Dayton Street; and vehicular access to the vicinity is provided largely by SR-524, Sunset Avenue, Admiral Way, and Dayton Street. A traffic signal, is located at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. A left turn lane channels traffic from SR-104 westbound onto Dayton Street. Planned street improvements on Dayton Street may provide better channeling of traffic, reducing congestion at the intersection of Dayton and SR-104. The impacts of the rezone on the road system will be efficiently handled by the capacities of the streets, existing and future traffic control devices, and planned street improvements. d. The proposal will generate new left turn movements on Dayton Street by vehicles wishing access to the site. New right-turn.movements will be created by vehicles exiting the site onto Dayton Street f. Increased traffic volume and turning movements at the site will increase the potential hazards on Dayton Street and adjacent roads. 18) Aesthetics, and 19) Recreation The site is located north of the Union Oil Marsh - owned by the Union Oil Company. It is a fresh water marsh,. designated as a wildlife sanctuary, and supports the variety of plant and animal life typically found in.fresh water marshes. In addition, the marsh serves as a buffer zone and open space in.an area of more intense development. The City of Edmonds Shoreline Management Master Program states: '.'priority should be given to,public acquisition of the property" (p.6) to maintain its present characteristics. The site plan will dedicate public access to the Union Oil Marsh with a path along its edge. There will be no.paths built on the marsh interior. Although the marsh and Fts immediate surroundings are presently receiving minimal public use, the area has potential for important public use as a scientific, educational, and recreation site. The proposed rezone will not only have no adverse impact on these potential future public uses at the marsh, but the preliminary site plan (and the Port of Edmonds Master Plan) will provide an open space buffer along the marsh which will allow future public access along the marsh edge. This will maintain options for future use of the area for recreational and other uses. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SUPPL _NT BACKGROUND 6) Description of Proposal STREET FILE The proposed rezone will allow limited retail/commercial uses associated with marine activities; and those uses allowed under the existing zoning - IP (Industrial Park). Unlike the IP Zone, the rezone would allow manu- facturers to retail their products at the same location. This rezone, and the uses allowed, is based on the "Port of Edmonds Master Plan" (adopted May 14, 1979). The rezone would implement one of the four basic action elements of the Master Plan: "Develop.the Union Oil site as a Commercial Park containing a mix of water -related commercial, and industrial park uses." (p.43) The rezone will allow the Union Oil site to accommodate boat sales and service businesses who require public exposure. Other marine -related commercial businesses would also be allowed. Light industrial uses would be limited.to those permitted under the existing zoning, and would probably be limited to marine -related uses and "cottage" type industries. All uses will meet performance standards as specified in the contract, and will meet the Port of Edmonds' goal of providing a location for marine -related commercial and industrial activities. The existing zone prohibits commercial uses. The rezone will also allow offices to locate on the site. The preliminary site plan for the project indicates there will be about 190,000 square feet of industrial park space, 47,500 square feet of retail/commercial space,.and 47,500 square feet of office space, for a total of 285,000 square feet of leasable floor space on the site. Total site coverage for the proposed site plan, including building pads, parking areas, and access roads, will be 90% (537,160 square feet). The remaining 10% of the site (63,685 square feet) will be maintained as permanent open space. The major impact of the rezone is to alter the type of -use on the site. Under present 1-P zoning the site could potentially be developed with up to 285,000 square feet of industrial park uses. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (1) EARTH a. The existing site has been filled with sand and silt. The fill was placed on the existing soil, which may contain peat in places. The project will not cause unstable earth or geologic conditions, but will be subject to the existing site conditions. Although no specific soil tests have been performed in connection with this proposed rezone and site plan, Golder Associates, Inc. performed several soils analyses for the Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Industrial Park proposal in 1975. The conclusion of those studies was that "the filled areas are indeed suitable for the proposed develop- ment." (Page 16 of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park E.I.S. 1975)• Although the rezone proposal by the Port of Edmonds is different from the Cabot, Cabot and Forbes proposal of 1975, the general conclusion that the site is suitable for development from a soils and geologic standpoint applies to the present proposal. Foundations for the proposed structures may be shallow or pile -driven. Prior to construction additional soils testing and analysis will be performed based on the herein proposed site plan. b. The proposal will result in covering the majority of the site with buildings and roads. The construction process will disrupt, displace, and compact the existing soil con- ditions. e. The proposed project will not produce erosion which would affect the marsh to the south. The site will be engineered and sloped so that surface water runoff will flow north from all paved and building surfaces. All surface water 0 will be collected on the site and discharged into the City of Edmonds storm drain under Dayton Street. Erosion of the bank along the marsh will not increase due to project, be- cause no construction activity or structures will occur within 50 feet of the property line. Erosion of this slope which presently occurs could be alleviated by installation of ground cover and landscaping. These measures to mitigate existing erosion would have to be approved by the City. (2) AIR a. and b. The increased traffic resulting from the proposal (see #13) will add particulates and pollutants to the atmosphere. However, it is not anticipated that the pollutants related to the proposal will result in noticeable or significant impacts, nor will it affect the attainment of state and national air quality standards. Future light industrial or commercial land uses in the proposed development may produce air pollution and odors. These impacts are mainly related to light industrial uses on the site rather than commercial or office uses. The re- zoning of the site will have no impact on the potential air pollutants which might be created on the site since these uses would be allowed under the present I-P zone subject to the performance standards of the I-P. The City may request that these or other, performance standards be in- corporated into the rezone contract to protect against potential impacts. (3) WATER b. The proposal will decrease absorption rates of surface water runoff due to non -permeable surfaces created at the site. However, the quantity of non -permeable surfaces re- lated to the rezone is not expected to be greater than those associated with an industrial park, as allowed under the existing zoning designation. e. The proposed project will not discharge storm water into surface waters, and will not alter surface water quality. All surface storm water runoff from the site will be collected by an on -site drainage system, and discharged into the City storm sewer at Dayton Street. "71 `&- � i. The proposed project will require domestic water from the,, City of Edmonds. The water used by businesses on the site will be unavailable for other use. (4) FLORA, AND (5) FAUNA The proposed site is bordered on the south by the Union Oil Marsh. The rezone will not have an adverse impact upon the flora and/or fauna of the Marsh since there will be no encroachment of any future commercial or in- dustrial use into the marsh or into the natural buffer which will surround the Business Park. The rezone will not affect food chains, nesting areas, or endanger rare species of plants and/or animals. Storm water runoff will be captured on the site and emptied into the City's storm drainage system in Dayton Street. a. The project will necessitate the clearing of all existing ground cover, excluding trees. The project will result in the destruction of Scotch Broom, ground cover, etc. which serve as nesting grounds/habitat of some species of fauna (i.e. birds, rodents, bugs, etc.). f• Landscaped areas will be provided as shown on the site plan.. Native vegetation will be planted, thereby providing habitats for urban wildlife. (6) NOISE Noise levels will increase due to sounds associated with light manufacturing commercial and office uses and the increased auto traffic. The proposal will result in more auto traffic relative to the existing zone. However, it will probably have less light industrial uses, and their associated noises, than the existing zone. • Most noise levels will occur during regular working hours, though some uses may require off -hours operations, deliveries, etc. (7) LIGHT s GLARE On site lighting and car.headlights will produce new light and glare. It is not anticipated this will adversely affect adjacent land uses since they are commercial uses. The total amount of light and glare from the proposed project will not be significantly greater- than that which would be created with an industrial park development under present zoning. 8) LAND USE The proposal will result in the alteration of the present use (open storage in an "Industrial Park" zone) and planned use ("Industrial") of the site. However the contract rezone will allow uses akin to the present zone and Comprehensive Plan designations (Light manufacturing), and will also allow some related commercial uses. The proposed alteration of land use is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the site or adjacent land use patterns. Crab pots are currently stored on - site. Adjacent land uses include Safeway to the north; City of Edmonds Sewage Treatment Plant to the east; Union Oil Marsh to the south; crab pot manufacturing, aluminum boat fabrication, dry boat storage, and other marine -related uses to .the west. The on -site uses allowed by the contract rezone may have a beneficial impact upon marine -related land uses located to the west, since they are compatible. (10) RISK OF UPSET The additional commercial retail uses allowed by the rezone would not increase the risk of upset of hazardous materials. Nor does -will the rezone or the resulting development involve the storage of explosive or hazardous materials. Oil and gasoline could be spilled on the site. If this were to occur, the substance that was not cleaned up at the site of the spill would be trapped by the on -site storm drainage system, and would not be allowed to enter any water body. No radiation;chemicals, or pesticides are anticipated on the site.. (11) POPULATION AND (12) HOUSING It is difficult to accurately predict the impact of the rezone on future population and housing in Edmonds. The Port has discussed the relocation of several of its waterfront tenants to the proposed site. These tenants have expressed a strong interest in moving into new quarters on the industrial park site. As discussed in the Port of Edmonds Master Plan (May 1979), these marine -related businesses could utilize up to 100,000 square feet of leasable space on the site. In addition, there are other local (downtown Edmonds) businesses which may be interested in leasing space on the site. From this data there is reason to assume that up to 50% of the leaseable space on the property may be filled by existing downtown Edmonds businesses. The re- maining space on the site could be leased by businesses from Edmonds or other areas. These new businesses could create up to 200 jobs in 8 years (Source: E.D.A. grant application by the Port of Edmonds - 1979). Although these jobs may cause some people to move into Edmonds, creating the need for new public services, parks, etc, many of these future jobs will draw employees who will commute from areas near Edmonds, thus not affecting the housing in Edmonds. 13) Transportation/Circulation a. The traffic impacts can be best illustrated with a comparison between an Industrial Park, with uses as allowed under existing zoning restrictions; and the proposed Business Park, with uses as allowed in the proposed contract rezone. Each alternative assumes 285,000 square feet of gross floor area. Trip generation multipliers used in the analyses below are based on studies published in "Trip generation by Land Use" (Maricopa Association of Governments, April, 1974). Gross.floor area is indicated in units of 1000 square feet. Alternative A - Industrial Park (Existing Zonin A 285,000 square foot complex would generate approximately 2,656 vehicle trips per day.* The uses associated with this complex, as specified in the zoning restrictions, would be limited to "clean" manufacturing (excludes rendering, canning, smelting, stockyard/slaughter, etc.), wholesale dis- tribution, warehousing and storage, and associated offices. Retail uses are not permitted in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. Many local manufacturers retail their products out of the same location. These businesses would not be permitted to locate in an industrial park under the existing zoning. Therefore, man of the 2656 vehicle trips will be newly created by non -local businesses moving into the complex. .e 285(,000) x 9.32 = 2,656 vehicle trips , (9.32 is the multiplier for industrial parks, i.e., for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area there will be 9.32 daily vehicle trips generated). A 285,000 square foot complex would generate approximately 4588 vehicle trips per day.; The proposed rezone would allow limited retailing, in addition to the industrial uses allowed by the existing IP zone. It would allow existing local manufacturers to retail their products in the Business/ Industrial Park. The Port of Edmonds leases waterfront properties to private businesses, many of which could relocate to this complex. Therefore, some portion of the 4,588 vehicle trips per day generated by this complex, may be shifted from other areas of the City; the real traffic impact associated with the rezone/business park will probably be less than what the 4,588 vehicle trips indicate. 47,000 square feet of retail space 237,500 square feet of industrial park (includes offices) 285,000 square feet Total floor area 47.5 x 50.0 = 2375 vehicle trips (The 50.0 multiplier is an estimate, based on the "Maricopa". Studies, of the number of daily vehicle trips generated by each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area) . 237.5 x 9.32 = 2213 (9.32 is the.industrial park multiplier) 2375 + 2213 = 4588 Total Vehicle Trips Per Day (13) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION b. The proposal will create a demand for new parking all of which will be satisfied by on -site parking lots. c. The uses allowed under the proposed Contract Rezone will generate approximately 1930 more vehicles trips per day than uses under the existing IP zone. Access to the site will be provided directly from Dayton Street; and vehicular access to the vicinity is provided largely by SR-524, Sunset Avenue, Admiral Way, and Dayton Street. A traffic signal is located at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. A left turn lane channels traffic from SR-104 westbound onto Dayton Street. Planned street improvements on Dayton Street may provide better channeling of traffic, reducing congestion at the - intersection of Dayton and SR-104. The impacts of the rezone on the road system will be efficiently handled by the capacities of the streets, existing and future traffic control devices, and planned street improvements. d. The proposal will generate new left turn movements on Dayton Street by vehicles wishing access to the site. New right -turn movements will be created by vehicles exiting the site onto Dayton Street f. Increased traffic volume and turning movements at the site will increase the potential hazards on Dayton Street and adjacent roads. 18) Aesthetics, and 19) Recreation The site is located north of the Union Oil Marsh - owned by the Union Oil Company. It is a fresh water marsh, designated as a wildlife sanctuary, and supports the variety of plant and animal life typically found in fresh water marshes. In addition, the marsh serves as a buffer zone and open space in an area of more intense development. The City of Edmonds Shoreline Management Master Program states: "priority should be given to public acquisition of the property" (p.6) to maintain its present characteristics. The site plan will dedicate public access to the Union Oil Marsh with a path along its edge. There will be no paths built on the marsh interior. Although the marsh and its immediate surroundings are presently receiving minimal public use, the area has potential for important public use as a scientific, educational, and recreation site. The proposed rezone will not only have no adverse impact on these potential future public uses at the marsh, but the preliminary site plan (and the Port of Edmonds Master Plan) will provide an open space buffer along the marsh which will allow future public access along the marsh edge. This will maintain options for future use of the area for recreational and other uses. HEARING DATE: .tune 27, 1979 APPLICANT: Port of Edmonds " `='E°l7ED DATE: 5 -9/'-7,j G JUPJ is 1979FILE #: CITY OF EDMONDS REZONE FEE: 575.00 APPLICATION FOR REZONEir• Of Public WorksCONTRACT REZONE: 125.00 ENV. ASSESSMENT FEE:S25.00 ENV. CHECKLIST REC'D 60 REC'T NO: ADDRESS:456 Admiral Way PHONE V 774-0549 APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY: OPTION HOLDER RE CONTRACT HOLDER OTHER -.Please specify: OWNER OWNER: Port of Edmonds ADDRESS: See abovePHONE (If more than one owner, attach list or petition REQUEST REZONE FROM: Industrial Park TO: Contract - General Commercial Statement or reasons for rezone request. Statement may be attached. Please include any plans for development.) The Port would like to construct a Business Park at the Union Oil site to allow industrial, office, an_d.commerc`laL a-tivides_ The existing zoning does not allow commercial usPc, and the rpneral rnmmPrrial 7nne, as written, allows limited manufacturing & light industrial uses_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF.REZONE AREA: See Attached REQUIRED SUBMITTALS (Must be submitted at time of application) 1. Map drawn to scale of the area involved, showing all property lines,, dimensions, existing buildings and streets. Indicate North and adjacent zoning. 2. Vicinity sketch of the area with subject property shaded in. Indicate North and adjacent zoning. 3. Environmental Checklist, completed, with the $25.00 fee. 4. Names and addresses of all property owners within 80 feet of the boundaries of the proposed rezone site. ************************ This space to be completed by the Planning Department: Legal Description checked and approved by Date CERTIFICATION: I hereby.certify that the info on supplitso 'ty in this application is true to the best of my knowledge. Reild, iddleton 6ort Engineer ature of Owner or Agent tor uwner CITY DHONDS PROCT NAME Port of Edmonds Bus. Park ENVIRONMENIAL ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED May 21, 1979 The information on this form will be used I;o determine the effect of your action upon the environment of the City of Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible. 1. LAND 7�" Area 14.62 acres Soils Type Fill Sand & Silt Limitations some (see a•t-has ed) Description of t.opo-gra-phy,('% slope)Nearly flat terrain ranging from 8 ft., d1. to 14.5 feet above sea leve(6.59% slope) NOTE: If grading or filling will. 1.°vJ - I. Grading: --. at'ed ci►ba.c—yards None exceed 500 cubic yards a grading and filling plan imist be sub - Filling: Estimated cubic yards None — nutted with the application. A6 Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) 573,160 square feet (13.15 acres) •1� Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) 63,685 square feet 0.46 acres) .2. WATER Stream - Estimated flow (cubic feet per second) N/A _ Will stream be altered? No If yes, to what degree? Other water bodies? No Impact on Storm drainage None Method of handling runoff On -site retention, to be drained into City storm sewer system on Dayton Street Adjacent to shorelines zone? Yes Within 200 feet of MHFIW? No 3. VEGETATION Type and approximate number of trees Alders, Willows, and scotch broom, total unknown Minimum diameter of trees to remain Anknown 1 % of trees to be removed 10% Ground cover Existing: Native % to be removed 80i Proposed landscaping, if any See attached site plan 4. EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Multi - Vacant Family Family Conmiercial Other _North X _ South _ East (open space) public West r," X 15. 'CIRCULATION ..t Estimated increase in auto trips daily_ 1,930 vehicles Availability of public transportation Snohomish Coup and Metro Transit 6. AREA OF IMPACT_ Neighborhood City-wide X Regional !/. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY Increase traffic will increase pollutants.in the area 8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION Increased noise level due to. traffic and on -site 4 activities. _ b� , . 1p— kAe- u� � YJ�.t, I 6�.g. rA pit 5060"014H1N A "ENA I I XXTY, IWON IkUlU'ICIVA1M'1 ATItsIi-t (206) 623.2744 I `, 616 Seattle Towttr / 1216 Thl(d Avenw I Seattle, WA 96110 Li u 4 1979 r 9 $ 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PR F1 rl eau �010 LE Aew.a ale Sub $(led rol.lo►a., r owr. 1. 660 : 000 ,* u41rURovwPEDMON,1)5� I N-DUSTRI A�RK EDMONDS DreAt � w: g_330aQ0Q h~ PORN" 0F _ 1 Loos) S 330_000 50 car iawwittlE0 TORVINEN Phis" nuA10« 77 0 &M"Aopreae 4S6 ADMIRAL WAY ►ateFunfw: 1-NONE ZERO EDMONDS . WASH I NGTON tipCode `�020 IwAeba►y tttrl>c#ral►oA W prglecl U Ijh Atya proieot 01*NWa cxUy. A dels)W'd*ao►i tlon ahavid tlppw IA fM PloJepiOeealAtfoa aeeaon I The provisions of streets.and utilities in a 14 acre addition to the Port of Edmonds. A. JILLA1110NIaHIP TO GOALS AND PLANS 11 Ident►ly sprufie Dtalnbt rejjlond acunumlc devslupment al rate• e) Will any of the firth prase!j�1 L.fsted a1 the bile ye•.r the e►•G ahal us addressed by tNa project. (Bela► W 8ollcllstlon project la not construclpdJq ll y*r, pie..• .d•uuty tt►• Aotsce ter lasting of District Strsteglu.) brine, turd number of empbyaei for each bra. Firm fin b tee ALFAB _ SEE A(1) ATTACHED _ What are the major rat"on(s) for these farm• rekk-alung! �T IF'LLzSEE B(1) ATTACHED 2► briefly dts,nt;e h.rr Out& prulocl .umpltes with other adupled kKa1, subreatund.regu,naa, or Slate Plana Dud pullcAsb, ltlon- uly plane sno policies by title &aid. adopting agency ear juns- d►c utw►. SEE AM ATTACHED b. 1-GUNUUIC I►tPA'A 1► Direct emj.luythent tmpacla reaulting from a proposed project tacjudre a) emplut,ment as firms lucelutd of the project site ar a #*Gull of the, p►ujeel, b) =Ploymunl at uxlating brats as tl.e project bile due to expansion made puusabie by the project, c) YAM •baved, as a rebull of firma wnlwuinj{ at the project ease which •,told have had to leave in the Gbbenca of the project, no d) *mpluyment during pi jecl conblrucllun. a) hum txa,.y Pet-4 w1U be *replayed as firms jucating wino, the project area: Wuhan tsu year• of project eunpletauni l20_persons Wathut eight years Of project completion? 240 persons b) How many persons will be employed as a result of expan- eaun of existing (Lnua 1n the project sroG male possible by the prv)ect: Within two j•e:rb of project completionl_ 2-._per►uns Within eight years of project compicuun} 4J�►orsuru Where would they most likely relu:.se? SEE B(1) ATTACHED all How mu h labor wall be empluyeJ Junng prujr.t .,.n•tru;- tlotll_ _yerwn months of labor. 2) Employment by type of sconanlc acuvlty a) Indicate the peicentag* of daroct employment (J.ro,t employment is the total of now jobs and jobs aav*J b) the proposed project Identified In Is- 1 above) that you anticipate will occur in each major category of •con,," sctivlty below. Show these percentages log the 2 tg u and 11-year, porlode. Ecun�undc ACUVIIY per.ent -1 Utge.t r Within 2 year* • ►seta Ileavy Industry '� e Might Industry 7�1 tltt_G Retail/Service/commertaal -210 34—t Wholesale/Warehouse - 5 1 1.0. • loon b) Indicate the types of firma expected to locate .0 Gtlay at project site. If possible. pt.+vtJ. firm natmea. The very large majority of the land use will be associated with marine oriented activities. Some general commercial and professional activities that are attracted by the marine setting. may locate there. long: Inventory, pu►table egalpm nd wppUv .huuld at@a be Imelwild its Shia figure. , What r the total value of private capital Investmenl that will to made by firma vl Ihl he pruluot area wltldn tit'., yaare of • LAlwnI I �I 'Pith," f yvaro .,( Cunild.,uun �_. 41. 3SL.000" Mbel I& she lot., value ..f saplls,l ,nvu I at 1 ,analon by ssies.ng lost • aUhm two year t Y Ma t laWme a years .1 iwapletlent -, e) Ysavlde sysdenty .hvra possible that Ills type ul ucunwids ✓sivlYs@ padlsated aLuve will .sear 11 the project Is built. (Lvidense goy Ls In the taro of @os•sNlmanl• of !Irma to &@arse on sill., record. ul Inquiries grow firms, via.) The pressure for this has been great and sustained for a considerable period of time. However, no specific record has been kept systematically. C. 11,11.0ACT COTS Ind.. see caastr\acltson cuss of proposed Isclllty. It the project aovwvu ct"winsc/lon of more than ono Isclllty such as s road dung. anl► sowar and •a/@r 110w. wo suly &be owI of sach asparassly. (Oo ties, ins)wde reel vl loin/.) roc"y SEWER. SANITARY SEWER, STORM STREEIS .—.ELErJRICAL -- WATER TOTAL construction Coat g 148.000 a 72,000 25A.000 — ----- 55,000 129,000 ____1 660.,000 11 I&"(�is UNf0�1 she prspwod project. Indicate the cult (W%LKAL hPOASGK I140kMATIOM ;r L.xal bb✓e Su,.rtstal of lucsl malthtng funds to-g.. ULIU, rev,mue W"oo. HUD -GU, eac.)i HALF.OR 330,000 WI.at ►o she *lotus of securing local matching fund*? AVAILABLE NOW Ary share ltrwi.uunb on Ilia use ur lima Availability u,4 the' k.caJ bhare? NOT IF THERE ARE REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE PROJECT WILL RECEIVE FAVORABLE RESPONSE. ..,a In ✓1 Prole llnsneea In wheys or In pby flow @ewtswyY I�I It isipticipated that generated revenue will be the basis for at least � part of the half furnished by the Port of Edmonds What other saureco'djpublic granla or bast& have bete we"ba for the proposed pr*all 1) Spoasor's sttt.J'for funds+ tshat are the reabons these funds are required for this project? The implementations of the new master plan for the Port of Edmonds has need for large sums of money and the Port has limited funding sources. wbal is the e141UP tit 4bwN appYoatbhet NA i) Afflrmoslvo Aetlota rrydrdn Duv@ the Opens". have i'll apprvvvd all v �}�t �{�, x equal emplayoanl Opportunity pou.yt M "ti l S- T (ME 9. PROUCT RLAOIN61111 1) Provide information eostteralng the swung of acttoss@ bated below, and where appllcable, the .liency raapomatble &as accomplishing the aetba. (it action baa already Occurred. Indicate by recording compieuwt datei at, cao@a %barn* UW action has not bast ociYrrod. pruvtda approatsmaa@ p@ocssa- Ing time required and t..rgel sompleues, dato.I Action Isl.-d Ike* ponailow, Aceacl e) A-06 Cj Aiiiaammeninf I al Environmental Statement dj Alght•of-way @I Permits; II Shorell"s 21 Cap@ of Engine*$ 31 flanwl@a/osrne 41 building . n Preliminary Dnlgr► g) Plans g spoolllosileM hj Zoning 1111e89n1 0 Relocallon A Pawing utlyation _ NO PORT OF EDMONDS NO PORT OF EDMONDS _ NO PORT OF EDMONDS —NOT REQUIRED NO CITY OF EDMONDS NOT RE UIRED NOT REQUIRED 0 I Y OF EDMONDS YES PORT OF-EDMONDS NO PORT OF EDMONDS YES CITY OF EDMONDS NO PORT OF EDMONDS IS NONE 2) Pruvidu pertinent inlurmetiuu c..neurntnd cummurusy in%eiv.a,ama 1n and ►upp wt for the project includius actiona at a:uvitras by elucted officiab, the bu►tnvca :oonmusuty. aad citi+eoe' group (e.g. Public hearing.. reaoluuona. sic.) See Attachment A M . The City Council has accepted the Port's master plan for this site and support industrial and commercial uses for the site. Fu0Jt1CT DLiCIR10114 M 11ne1►utswe lulluwin0 yuurllune ��` • awo 0+ be" d lam$ Pass.) I j. wlwrwr UTILITIES.6, IREETS F211 THE PORT EDMONDS UNION t AtwM Amolr of holMnw w be of"ituoled. Show lMilom of Aw"A"d M a uir 000 ow NwtlM M of " on a womily sM ow "oft~ so "a o/ AW papa ..r.r...w�a��q .•w� � wr.�lr..�. �.wrw�� SEE ATIACHMEN - F Z i.r riw�.www.�ww.rr� ■ i Aw.. ■ ..........rw. .�wr.wrw�.�w .r.r�� lgel N1111 t+1.�nlrwowllaWw MM.rwIN why's Irrl Alwft 1*1 R080gr SEE N .r.u...�.w.rrirrrww. i q.�lwww..�.ww�n.r.w�.w.ww irriia .a..w....•.n.w' �.� . wr.w i•...rr.• .ww�wr .w .�..�_ Iwwrw....ar..r �rar.^rr.IrwPl r w.�.1 • r� OMdIN ommweU Mat wM% . let,awl. &wsg&v,@.lmmediat,jv sout_gf_Dayton Stleet and east of SR-104, Edmonds, Wa. w"jin aosol __ 14.1 ACRES N ftym malwoo Formerly was largely a swampy area that now has been filled by a C.rww Iw rae an am '01 C.r.ww hnw wN 44ame 0 NN resent. About 1.5 acres used for storing crab �.� .t t t _.,• •t . .• . i AN u•aw Nor «wipnn.ewleNr "owi#w We" within a nar the tile? Now mw "" we" a aNetaaO or p "w"d a "N"tlon of lulus 0"opmenl? 0. r -Wy Iar oast pupl.p be liwa n0paaa.ry to aupprt planned dol. None for this site not mentioned previously. mr1 ON" ao not now esw: w.w•nanwauw,.aMowao?--Any other incidental necessities 'will be absorbed by the Port and/or its tenants. 7 AAamimeata—Lai on6*0*1papaprUlatn.ctiona. ATTACHMENT A-1 I. Enhance the capability of Central Puget Sound ports to successfully compete for expanding trade oppartunities. 2. Accelerate development of additional facility capacity for commercial and sport fishing to capitalize on the availability of the North Pacific bottomfish resource. 3. Maintain and enhance the industrial base in existing suburban and urban activity centers through the upgrading of public facilities in conjunction with formulation of regional water -and air quality attainment strategies. 4. Support planned programs to stimulate urban industrial development and redevelopment designed to stabilize and enhance the employment and tax base of in -city locations. 5. Support urban development and redevelopment programs designed to increase private investment and economic activity in the regions major commercial and business service centers. ATTACHMENT A-2 I. The Port of Edmonds new master plan conforms to all City of Edmonds zoning. 2. The Port's master plan also conforms to the goals and policies established by the City of Edmonds, eq. the City's current master plan. 3. In addition; it conforms to the City's newly adopted CW zone (commercial waterfront) which is basically the implementing tool of the Shoreline Plan. 4. The City of Edmonds Shorelines Citizens Advisory approved the plan with the suggestion of a very few minor changes. None of these suggestions applied to the Industrial Park area. 5. The Edmonds City Council recently accepted the Port's new master plan as shown. 6. No implementing Shoreline permits or approvals have been received. 7. No environmental review has yet been made. However, as the implementation of other local approvals have been sought and given, no serious opposition arose and none is ancitipated for this program. -This is particularly true concerning the industrial park area which i's fartherest removed from the direct waterfront, and has no apparent controversy associated with it. ATTACHMENT 8(1) Until recent land acquisitions, including the 14.1 acre site obtained from the Union Oil Company and which is the land for which the utilities and streets are sought at this time, the Port of Edmonds had no land either for expansion of tenant firms or for new firms. Consequently, for a.considerable period of time tenants of the Port of Edmonds which had outgrown their space have been restricted in growth. One of these firms has been Alfab, a manufacturer of `Rage two quality aluminum boats and skiffs. Presently they are not only restricted in growth, but are working in such cramped quarters that they estimate that their efficiency cannot be greater than 65-75 percent. They now employ 15 people. Their business is such that within two years -they could employ another 10, and within eight years a total of another 25. Unless they can see an opportunity for this increase in efficiency and growth within the near future they will have to leave. It is uncertain where Alfab might go if they do leave, It probably would be to another port area where they have ready access to water as well as'to the other modes of shipping. Two other firms have expressed their need for more space in order to accommodate growth. These are Craig Craft and Sea Marine, both of which sell and service, and repair, boats. Craig Craft estimates that they could increase their employees from 3 to 7, while Sea Marine believes that an increase from 10 to 30 over a period of time is realistic. ATTACHMENT F-2 This project is to cover all utilities electrical facilities and streets) in acquired by the Port of Edmonds. See ATTACHMENT F-3 (sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water, the 14.1 acre Union Oil Site recently attached Site Plan The installation of the streets and the utilities in th,: Union Oil Site will make this 14.1 acre area available for expansion by the Port of Edmonds. The Port has committed all of its land which is not now dev,:loped for use. The recent acquisition of this property will: 1. Permit several.tenants to expand their businesses, which they - cannot now do in their present locations. This will add new jobs. 2. Permit new tenants to locate in this prime port, water associated property. This.will add new jobs. 3. The addition of this new land will also permit. the Port to begin the reassignment of some of its presently used land in accordance with its new master plan. This new master plan will not only permit the Port to operate more.efficiently, but will also permit a larger percentage of.the land to be used at its best and highest use. Until the Port has an opportunity to expand into this area, it has virtually no flexibility in land use and no ability for expansion by existing tenants. The size, location and zoning of the site provide a number of opportunities for a mix of uses. The adjacent streets provide opportunities for uses that require a high degree of visibility. Also, the site is large enough to provide a circulation system that reduces conflicts between different types of businesses. dr / QUO` V� O4, l� �O �1b4. OJ �\ P,0 � O° 4t.o ore Q-° Q o° MDUSTM AL Wetland I Sanctuary Edmonds City Limits )it Uplands qt 0 Of vi l�C[C( W(eeedeel'oK �r QQOC1QtC'Q. 74C. TV r--- i�pr� ENGINEERS* SURVEYORS • PLANNERS °"• T - ` R. .'4 U •;n . i n:l•. W—;,:'-}•.n ^,P 100 CH. SCALP I . co 00 tom.. T� _T_ a n CD1t N O J . O: :3 to Cj E W N;U w-. 1 NO S►. 1)�YX REQUI D Statutory Warranty Deed (CORPORATE FORM) MAR 8. ),978t_ss KIliKE ,lEYElZS, WlOish told Irma By 1 Deputy THE GRANTOR , Union Oil Company of California, a California. Corporation, for and in consideration of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) in hand paid, conveys.and warrants to Port .of Edmonds, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, the following described real estate, situated in the County of S N O H 0 M I S H , State of Washington That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range-3 East,, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection 'of the South line of Section 23, and the easterly. right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 42° 34' 34" east 616.3.7 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 42034134" east 731.18 feet to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line south 580 17'06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88*42'06" east 524.29 feet; thence south 41°39'17" east 110.49 feet -to the right of way of SR-104 (as condemned under S.C.C. NO. 106375); thence south 1*08154" West along said right of way a distance of 800.00 feet; thence South 73°00'00" West 240.00 feet; thence North 88030'00" West 110.00 feet; thence north 66*00100" west 140.00 feet; thence North 40"OQ_•00" west 125.00 feet; thence North 1000'00" west 200.00 fegi; thence north 37°00'00" west 260.00 feet; thence south 7f'°Ob"'.0.0" West`401.09 feet to the true point. of beginning. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, sai0'corp.6% iatt,4as cayFi6;tlil+i lrument to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixes' tja &27 th >jay of ruary , 1978. (J 1 U ��Ot4,•-ATL••• COMPANY ... OF...CALIFORNIA,..... • p, • A jal,itornia Corporation J• ... , STREET FILE `• � 0 E.' + •' " - 'Vice President. Assistant Sfrretorv. STATE OF CALIFORNIA • ss. _ • County of _Los AngeleA _ On this 2nd day of March , 1978 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Charles F. Parker and J.R. Courtney to me known to be the Vice President and Asst. Secretary; respectively, of Union Oil Company of California, a California Corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute -the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. iH1hIlYYNII11iM1�Il1YNYIlY1NtlU1N0AItNYGYMIl11M11�IAWIMIIMIlY1RINIMM�t11tlY1 OFFICIAL SEAL _ PRANCES JENNINGS�;_oj ...............NOTARY PUBLtC•CALIFORNIA Nalork• Public ' nd for talifornia PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN € reading at Los Angeles LOS ANGELES COUNTY n ' p �9 My Commission Expires December 26, 1981 6 ►tn� C,-iJ PA�I 5 U �.................... I...............Y.mw Y.Y W 11Mi W �fiSYW wIJ f U c• -� �`�= �- -ram l _5 �%1�-� -- - �,Q�. d'Z.e, _s�.6z�ee _��(e6z... - ��,v�, C �� - - . o�av - 72'7,v-4 �J 7 -- 5t-c — U `1�•`� - 60_ _ Bf�- cQ - Y.� c�11� ry U /"I k-cfn� t i � n �-- 7 / .J b/ �L____ '�F-i ..D' may.. l�..C'1 �b�-- -'...:_ � - �-�-f� \ ✓`� i�f� ..-r .�i. .—_ akotA4— I lew at 11162z- t-", �LQ.td-F 111A�igL \� t�u4u1 LQUQU�\C,V ItS c1b Luy KLNS�� \5-1$' i LA,e[L . L-scA'Ul�LwI\A FRq�y\ kl\ kLss 3 (SAL, M AzOus \L,(A1 s IAA. OR Mcoj% k $Caor•\ S C-, ACE- [\QL,d Arum \u• VNL WAL AzkE kmpo'bloLS �'.r 3 • - -- + MAFbr,\A Ckiu\Fouvrn . � — - - G¢F60U CY A�� .�.�. 44 i I�, r ?� RNUS •IhuaM� `J FVAcYSL J..IE.� o C\skUL- CA, Q1tJs;-> 1 ^C\ \ \ Se..L'hi) 14 0•C. PivAia1A C2p1m s FN i # RgLLS t U4A, MJG, AUS O LuauMAhiUz- S�,n¢rc\ru,R _ 'SdEc-t Lv,rh -#ilk o �ltNacR c1.,.1,�5 IS bt Vyoce\ww% SGAL. --- 1 6 '&'JeuuM �Llui -S bll. z - t- Paws N\FjA s 6 ee R:�el�nC.lr'it.ri -�kAj ftA2�. Ell al:�mUi ALATUs C4C.' __ C--,,Z�ALi RA lu-CloAJA 1 kL - ExcEo�,91A4 Azcn. E�+sF N .c+r_�ce r1:a11ic1 e 2' (O CZ o= FRei-L M.ILch �N IL.),eQS BCds. t ;; of •,-. .. ••�fg'11i ��'If4�t�Nk • r + T ��fNY,� { r I`,;..,- I 1 - �C�� I NiN _"•I . k4amr"��} CI%.� !, i. c - / i�+16*��t:gh .11'Mf�. '1-.....-.. I:well,tfj;.3{tttri�(yu1`rr,•ti?`+sn' L C ?i'"s tyw,Y 3. .tr a 1s"�J.K.�Y.rl'Y"Y'f -R. t� l�;vw'�•... ..i,.F ._ .._ _.._.... -�. -.,.1...:._.....«-..-`..__..-_._..,...... ..,. r=—......». .. �.:;=I /•r� Ns�;1�f4f4� +:�J�iy.ytl. .-3�:-w +�J._-:: -i-.� •t-:� - ` - - `. \H:�.. ,,x-,'!n, FFQ�1�111vt �,.�'"i, t. .. ,. ., �(�'}.S�/IT..,,tiy..r3Ti�T:• fM•�1i. RF?•f4fiT7M'�TFArLiNN.SC9r\'.fTGf u:1P:`6tTn'.vTtC�lY9'ro:1*Mi+t�iitilWil�V�Is'oafs.ebw�.0.ra..+.r.....�..-.�•.. .. ro tt`L'ILITY EASEi'"iF;',!T IN CONSIDERATION of henefit_s to acc-t.L,,, t() thI:> yrantors herui.r,, thr.: ' undersigned, G. ROBERT JOHNSTON :rnct _ODDNY S . JOHNSTON hereby grant to the CITY OF Et)MONDS, a Municipal corporation, a permanent. easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of a storm sever over, across, through, and below the- property; and further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructi.ans interfering with the location, construction and ma.i.ntenarice of said utility or utilities, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The easement and right-of-way hereby granted is located in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: The south 10 feet of the east 10 feet of C.ot. 3 of: Fcelt Addition No. 2 according to the thereof, recorded in VOIumP 20 of Plats, page 48, records of. Snohomish County, Wash.i.rgton, THE CITY agrees to restore to subs tant-i.al.l.y t.l�,e original concit-ic�n such improvements as are dis;turhed during the corm ,t-.ruc t-icn, mai.ntf�nan(...e and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure offer, upon, or within the permanent easement. V.j C1 DAITED-' _�hik 15th day of March 1.983 C nt. C_- ram- (\`'JU Husband C.: V V ..= W i f. e c. a ' STATE OF W11oiH I NGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) . On this day personally appeared before me G. Robert Johnston and Oddny S. Johnston to me known to he the i.ndividual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that theme signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY FTAND .,1jp' OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 15th DAY OF March 19 83 . - ';\. Boa f''• ! t NOTARY PUBLIC -in and for the State of a'U3L�� `1.ac Washington residing at: Edmonds r, AGREEMENT A14D COVENANTS IN THE NATURE OF A CONTRACT REZONE This is an Agreement and Covenants between THE PORT OF EDMONDS., herein- after referred to as "THE PORT" and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal'corpora- tion, hereinafter referred to as "EDMONDS". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, THE PORT is engaged in the development of:a parcel of, real property in Edmonds, including the following: That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range'3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the South line of " Section 23, and the easterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right of way north 420 34' 34" east- 616.37 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 42034134" east 731.18 feet to the southerly right of way of Dayton Street; thence along said southerly right of way line south 580 17.'06" east 12.54 feet; thence south 88042106" east 524.29 feet; thence south 41°39'17" east 110.49 feet to the right of way of SR-104 (as condemned under S,C.C. NO. 106375); thence south 1008'54" West along said right of way,a distance of 800.00 feet; thence South 73000'00" West 240.00 feet; _thence North 88030'00" West 110.00 feet; thence north 66°Wool' west 140.00 feet; thence North. 40000100" west 125.00 feet; thence North 1000'00" west 200.00 feet; thence north 37000'00" west 260.00 feet; thence south.71000'00" West 401.09 feet to the true point of beginning. WHEREAS, THE PORT .has applied for a change in the zoning of the property from its current IP classification to GC; and WHEREAS, EDMONDS has caused the application in its entirety, including, but not limited to the Environmental Checklist, to be reviewed by its Planning, and Engineering departments and has fully considered recommendations made after such staff review; WHEREAS, THE PORT has determined a willingness and ability to implement certain of the aforementioned staff recommendations in the course of its pro- posed development ih,the event its requested rezone is approved; and WHEREAS, THE PORT and EDMONDS are willing to enter into an agreement in the nature of a,contract. rezone reclassifying the parcel.from IP to GC, now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I. This Agreement is tendered by THE PORT to EDMONDS*and accepted by EDMONDS, and all parties agree it is applicable to the parties to this agreement, their heirs, successors and assigns, both as to duties and benefits. The terms of thi's agreement shall'be specifically enforceable. i4t 2. EDMONDS shall be under no obligation to issue THE PORT or its successors or assigns a building permit for improvements or.expansion upon any of the subject property of THE PORT unless such improvements lie within the terms hereof and the.applicable oridinances at the time of any application for building permit, or other permits or approvals. 3. This agreement and each part of it shall be considered covenants' running with the land covered hereby and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of THE PORT. It shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the grantor/grantee index with THE PORT being listed as grantor and EDMONDS as grantee and all costs of such recordation shall be paid by THE PORT. Such recordation and payment of said costs shall be a condition precedent to THE PORT exercising any rights under the terms of this agreement. 4. In consideration of EDMONDS reclassifying the Parcel from IP to GC, and for so long as the property remains so classified, THE PORT covenants as follows: (a) To develop the subject property in substantial accord with the form and design of the si.te plan set forth in Exhibit ''A" (including attachments thereto) attached hereto and made'a part hereof by this reference. THE PORT reserves the right to make minor revisions in final plans.subject to review by the EDMONDS' Department of Community Development. Such development will include substantial landscaping, parking provisions, fire protection measures and all.,other necessary on -site improvements. (b) Participate in the improvement of Dayton Street from the Intersection of SR-104 to BNRR right-of-way to a 32 foot paved section con- structed to City standards; including the realignment of the existing storm d.ra i n , not to exceed one half the total cost of said i mp rovement . ('c) All work shall be done in such manner that no unusual noise or'disturbance will be caused and no unsightly debris allowed to accumulate nor any nuisance created in the area neighborhood. (d) Those uses provided for in The City of Edmonds OrdinanceZ.a, 12. 13-270 except: Automotive Wrecking; Fuel Storage Yards, Kennels and Mobil Home Parks. (e) THE PORT hereby dedicates in perpetuity an open space easement along the marsh edge to protect its integrity and provide public access. The easement shall be 50 (fi.fty) feet in width measured landward q ! 1 from THE PORT'S south property line as shown on the Attachments hereto. (f) In no case will any building or other structure be con- structed on the. property which would encroach upon or restrict the use or intent of the open space easement. 5• No applications shall be made by THE PORT or EDMONDS or their successors or assigns to amend for a period of two years from.the date hereof. Thereafter, either THE PORT or its successors or -assigns, or EDMONDS may, upon application filed.in the same manner as a rezone application, apply to amend or terminate the provisions and covenants of this agreement or to change the zoning on said property. Said application to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said .property shall, as aforestated, be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other application for a rezone of property in the City of EDMONDS. Such action by either party shall not release the other or its successors or its assigns from the obligations assumed under this agreement, unless and.until such application shall be.duly approved by EDMONDS. 6. EDMONDS will cause the necessary ordinances to be enacted to rezone the Parcel from IP to GC for those allowed uses as defined and permitted by the Edmonds Zoning Code in effect at the time of this contract, and for such uses as. are contemplated and intended b this a reement an Y and'the attached 9 Exhibit "A": 7. In•the.event either party must bring suit to enforce any of the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party in said action shall be entitled to- reimbursement of all costs for said litigation together with a sum as and for reasonable attorneys fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this contract this day of 1979• THE PORT OF EDMONDS By CHAIRMAN CITY OF EDMONDS By MAYOR ATTEST: EDMONDS CITY CLERK STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of Snohomish ) On this day of , 1979 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared to me known to be the Chairman of THE PORT OF EDMONDS, the agency'that executed the fore- going instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said agency for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was..authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and.year in this certificate above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in-and.for the State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON.) ss. County of Snohomish ) On this day of 1979, before me, the undersigned a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared H. H. HARRISON and IRENE VARNEY MORAN, the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively of the CITY OF EDMONDS, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the.free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on' oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument andithat-the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corpora- tion. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for. the State of Washington, residing at � • a COMMON PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The property in the City of Edmonds to be rezoned from I-P (Industrial Park) to GC (General Commercial) consists of approximately 14.62 acres. It is owned by the Port of Edmonds, and is bounded on the west by the Burlington Northern Railroad Right -of -Way; on the north by Dayton Street;.on the east by State Highway 104; and on the _south by the Union Oil Marsh (see legal description for details). F3 T. 27 N. R 3 E.W.M. CC,Qgo� M9/N PERMIT TO ENTER TO \/e pRSF (72 !�O 6 t�Ap Cor4STRIICT MINI - PARK O o c ( qr I ION NO. STwTf FED. I11D PROJCCT NO. IF SHEETNO. to wwsN. F- 104 3RD AVE. N O" 04' W a �l p !Z 11 �2. 9B lO M ^�. \ N v to `D �)v 4B B4 H� A'N O' I \~\) 3 ./ i ...... 7 w o 2• / „ O I F- > M J 0 a0 a, z 7t - oc / G3N a v W La Q /� ^ R/W FOR ° P,r b h q VF• PERRY r � � - - ° TERMINAL E 1/4 5E A C.23 ; o: ti0r�62o •. °422 �d : I PANG LOT J y EDMONDS SEWAGE 2ND AVE. v PARKING as TREATMENT PLANT ' ._...................... 1W. ..., T' -' i'T-" 3986' ............... ..................... W 2" io nt oo< O h lip Q 'w m alI-7624d) LL Y .o z . i 1; '�+ z I-762 n s �)�� o + STORE I ' J1 r © n •, >> z, q o s30 �6�2 L91 0� ° N 0 9+SO n '"> - n 1 /. -A CM t 9•00 N O J--'^ * • 7.IL •° ) q .: r `.� , >6 ,•h\� _ TY1 N ACK LINE • • s 0 0 ..... 335'= 298.88'' N O'0T W • 70.0' i ......... ..... ...... .. .... ........... .. ; L'iNE'60VT.'LO .3. .................. BEGINNING OF/''' PLAN MENr �,. ry „ , sq --- ----- ------ - L _ s • - 8 s •�' ...� . 1 I ..E.. T EASE b' T OL ST o° - 2.0. Z L I N E 5 Q 104 STA . L 9 ♦ 4 8 �8 3 \NP6E,�>, �' ' J' P P`►, k ,i3 - - - _ ORAMa\n p: /i 4 :.� zo3--o...ea� .._.=.tea 501a08'54`W r'i. P 24.45 o GOV T LOT 2 q eR 6 0, : • • • O 2 TO SEATTI 1 h.� .\v \ A 2 O.07'00" 3 I I Ui 2VEasem�enf ~ `.� \ �s SEC. 23 '` L 19a19.61 P15.70 IOO i• �\ \ \ \ • �' % 0 i lStata, to Ma ntan,) �cs. s ? �. LD I SpQ \� I N CIRADTt'NTERSE=Gi�f 10'IVi?�'35 7 , / TURNBACK v I ! L- -L 22+24.85_P O.T. as / 9 •\9 • a 30 \ `� '�` • ti \ j ;� DAYTON 10+00.00 P. QT. za• �. i/ } q 4±23 G vv LINE pAY TON I I.75= 'll •75 NOTE* ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES PRECEDED SY AN ASTERISK ARE TAKEN FROM TITLE REPORTS AND/OR PLAT MAPS. FOR TOTAL PARCEL DETAILS SEE SHEET 1 OWNERSHIPS PARC. NAME _ TO_ T_._AR_EA_ _TAKE LT. RC MAINDE_RRT. _ ASESAEN7 1-7614 GREAT NORTHERN RT.CO. 7,411 S.F 1-7615 NOT USED 1-7616• NOT USED - - 1-7617 BELMONTIM VEMENTCO. 18,5605.F. 4,3605F. _ 1g2A05. 1- 7618 NOT USED 1-7619 NOT USED 1-7620 DANIEL A.4 LAURA McFARLAND 7 2005.F 7 200 SF. 1-7621 IVIZED8.tSTUART D.NE 51280SE 3,080 &FI 22005E 1-7622 C.T. BRADY 83600SF 3 8305F. 43770 1-7623 .A PA _ER DEVELOPNENTCO. 1824005E 4705F. IBIP30 1-7624 • VID W. 9ANNABELLE CROW 65230 4 6SOS . 60580 1-7625 17YOFEDMOND3 153050 4505F. 152 5F. 1-7686 CITY OF EDMDI.IDS I6(o 700 1S.1; . S, 1.7626 UNION OIL COMPANY 4,300,000SF 430410 SA 869590SF. 43.800 s.F 66700 S.F. 1-10422 CITY OF EDNONDS 12,OODS.F. O 1200055. #120005.F. 1-10916 WILLtAM N. RYAN 21 o23S.F. 21.0235.F. ODPpIBm-1- nLa U,51l 9`1 AST. ENE I/4 SE'/4 5EC. 23 r� A � sl✓ � 1O 'So. 4V� \sr / f L-SZA.10+ 00 P.OT.= f �i R.R.STA.1035-03.2ROT os 81 ly<96 41 ' w a 1> O Ashalt d 1 Q pQ Parking m: y F� �\\.� �w � / L��'.e`` •�y �\� `. \ I'9s F i •� ;O�I {rgyyr Jrlti 9 >~ 2_ MARINA WASHINGTON STATE FERRY 5YSTEkA i �l EDMONDS TERMINAL. • '� ,.'----'} O 2`\�\`�\ q• •v' i tr'� 9� I Z ,\\ \`� `� j (J ♦ syl I I- ` Z ' .� Z O'''� t U 01 CURA `VE DAT I �, P. I. STATION 0 R T L V_0 19 • 10 6I 29_ _ 12' 5"_� 600.00 U _/ 156. 37' 308.93' L E6CN0 _ 12 PLATOF EDMOND5 ACCESS TO BE PROHIBITED PROPERTY OWNERSHIP NUMBERS Sa�GEPHARTS ISTADDITION TO EDMONDS ;PROPERTY LINES Drainage (State to Maintain) Letier3-24-11 1,3-25-77 RN.1-74•78 Noted r rt convejed to Ci+ .o{ FConetroctlon - 4ut Letka%0.25_16 1-14-7T Added WWforFerr4Ter .;QPorKiryLot4Riaell- $Perrrirt to consir Dct mini -Park Letter 2-29:12 3-11-72AAdeJ permit io enter teconsirmt, mini rk Sta. 14 LaMer10-27-10 II-12-70 Ravi-d eoaem¢r.t Sr.. L9+48.65 4o to 10.68 SCALE IN FEET m L¢t c . aA0 6-11-10 tEen arts L94B&11oN¢in5T.32W01t L9Mee to " III La iti4q, - G 72-1 - n o o.sn a each a,d: of ka s• L¢tt ,o-B�7r i 10• •Hi Ownus f roroa a tntemt a nor i c -2,- qIW sawrm on l9MB.ea N,slneL ♦oC FOR RELIN UISHMEN + TO CITY Conveyed tocit n M of Edmonds by deed 1-5-7o J GOV'T. LOT 3 SEC. 23 HAR OOR sQ UA9i_r O O M -1 M Limited Access features tentatively approved January 9, 1969 by authority of Washington State Highway Commission. EXHIBIT A w4 Limited Access established by Commission Findings and Order o, issued Moyl9,1969. SR 104, MP 24.45 TO MP 25.81 EDMONDS FERRY TERMINAL TO 5TH AVENUE SNOHOMISH COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY O LIMITED ACCESS PARTIALLY CONTROLLED STA. 9-48.83 TO STA 31.00 WASHINGTON sun HIGHWAY COSAINKS 014 DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS OLYM►IA. WASHINGTON Edmondsb deed 1-5-78 RL5 J.or e.e..a a.ra.r 10976 on Rt.vicSio.Istoo RL5 /14��0U. 426to5 u. paaell•gitl RLS (!/ �%i �R January 9. 1969 L640g glK�h1GL4�_-_ RLM-_ RLM.w1��1 WLM Y L 134EDR1. oruedeln,¢d rurrels RL5 , 2 a % fM(Rs nvL AM_ AM ms- Ei Designated for Limited Access Control by ,o anL Commission Resolviion No. 197T. June IT 1968. I ri R/w sk-40Y;�7 # 21967 STREET FILE CITY OF EDMnNDS BUILDING DEPAF-ME'"T WED DATE: OFFICIAL: PERMIT NUMBER 15GD2.0�5- It SPECS: Design and fabricate one dimensional building fascia sign. Features all aluminum frame and panel with routed dimensional lettering and logo. Client: Austin Harp Arts Address: 110 West Dayton Mobile # 206.817.8444 E-mail: akaharp@gmail.com RECEIVED SEP 112015 DEVELCl1C7R Y 0 EDMONDS COLOR SPECS PMS 3275 PMS 7629 ❑ Beige ❑El_ Front View Routed Routed Dimensional Dimensional Logo Lettering & Graphic 1 /2" PVC 20 Square Feet Contact: Alison Austin Date: 8/26/2015 City: Edmonds State: WA Izip: 98020 Job # 21967 Phone # - Po # - Fox # - Sales: D. Russell Design: D.R 0 coCD Aluminum Frame and Panel Side View 1.5" M APP OVED BY PLANNING Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. I v u2" H mt-u "ytE-Mg bm badmd wenbq; dgl.] W.SCALE• 1.25" = 1'-0" ON Customer has reviewed drawing and has approved for production. Signature Date ® COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from SPORTSRussell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are RUSSELL aO� �DS subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. SlG� For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. www.sportboards.net www.russellsignco.com 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 �X # 21967 M6 3.0" Br SPECS: 1.5" Aluminum Frame Bolted Angle Bracket 1"Aluminum Frame Angle Bracket Brick Anchors Screws through frame and angle bracket 1.5" Aluminum Frame Bolted Angle Bracket Design and fabricate one dimensional building fascia sign. Features all aluminum frame and panel with routed dimensional lettering and logo. e Austin Harp Arts AEA ress: 110 West Dayton SEP 1 �*Ile # 206.817.8444 IEy�ppMEt�iT EO gkaharp@gmail.com OF My COLOR SPECS PMS 3275 PMS 7629 ❑ Beige ❑ _ Specs: Mounted to Building with .25" x 3" Wall anchors through 1.5" Aluminum Angle. Frame is attached to bracket with counter sunken screws. production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Utt. Customer has reviewed drawing and has approved for production. Signature - Date Contact: Alison Austin Date: 8/26/2015 COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. Job # 21967 10SPORTS Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98020 Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are Phone # - Po # - RUSSELL BOO ROS subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. SIGN GQ www.sportboards.net For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. Fax # - Sales: D. Russell Design: D.R www.russ- 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 m O ai ca a) LL SPECS: Design and fabricate one dimensional building fascia sign. Features all aluminum frame and RED with routed dimensional lettering and SEP illlo2015.ao CTR. COLOR SPECS PMS 3275 PMS 7629 Beige ❑_ 25.0' Linear Feet # 21967 Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. ■ - Customer has reviewed drawing and has approved for production. Signature _ Date CITY OF 1 Client: Austin Harp Arts Contact: Alison Austin Date: 8/26/2015 RUSSELL SIG www.russelisignco.com COPYRIGHT and RUSSELL SIGN CO. Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from SPORTS Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are BOOR�et subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. www.sportboards.net For more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. 1 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 Address: 110 West Dayton city: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98020 Job # 2196710 Mobile # 206.817.8444 Phone # - Po # - E-mail: akaharp@gmail.com Fax # - Sales: D. Russell Design: D. m 0 ui CU tv U- t _OPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS SPECS: Design and fabricate one dimensional building fascia sign. Features all aluminum frame and panel with routed dimensional lettering and logo. COLOR SPECS PMS 3275 PMS 7629 Beige 21967 Production Will Not Start Until Customer Has Signed Off. Customer has reviewed drawing and has approved for production. Signature _ Date Client: Austin Harp Arts Contact: Alison Austin Date: 8/26/2015 RUSSELL SAGOFor www.russeiisignco.com COPYRIGHT 2015 RUSSELL SIGN CO. �O�TS Proofs are property of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without consent from Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Artwork and designs are ao#;Rl)s subject to a design fee. THIS DESIGN IS PROTECTED UNDER FEDERAL COPYRIGHT LAWS. www.sportboards.net more detailed information or to purchase the rights to use this custom design contact Russell Sign Co. 21104 70th Ave W. Edmonds, WA 98026 1 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 Address: 110 West Dayton City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 9$Q2Q Job # 21967�0 Mobile # 206.817.8444 Phone # - Po # - E-Mail: akaharp@gmail.com Fax # - Sales: D. Russell Design: D.R m O 3 hi CU Z N I. S• bm - BASIS OF-VEARIRGS s WAj,W-STATE DEPT. OF IMSA;;AYS \�••� -6.EASE AREA a NO. I 3-4,558SO. FT _ ----- _ Og. K i��6r�POPEO N SO REMpsN�I°0000 a SD R 5,I°00�„ V• T.P0.B. a�a� 700 AZ hb\6 h a` aO S F a SOUTH LINE OF SECT/ON 23 --- q 08 I S� DO / RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD BY REID MIDDpL�ETON,INC. C' THISJ. DAY 0 '=aaµs.. 1983A. D., AT �Liv_ MINUTES PAST c_ 0 LOCK�M: AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 1 OF BINDING SITE PLANS ON PAGFS1Lf�/4G RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DEAN V. WILLIAMS i yip; L� • ,' COUNTY AUDITOR �EPUT AUDITOR ®BUFFER :. SO. FT 1 s Euv 1s i i' � r .n. 0, \ LEASE AREA.-'- No.5 39.J-£f SQ. FT. y Z L�p`�co ��•: R=25' DAYTON S 8814206"E 10'BUFFER ST. 2900 SQ. FT. R=25' M 155.00 LEASE AREA No. 3 38,448 SO. FT. STORM SEWER EASEMENT AF °6 821035006 R.O.S. 69' BOOK 16 PAGE 259 LEASE AREA 37,8158 T. SQ. F / J 7 0 o LEASE - AREA LIMITS (TYPICAL) LEASE AREA 6 9 7 -- -- . ..-tEASE•AREA No. 9 31Q,665 SO. FT. 1 WATER MAIN EASEMENTAF 8212035007 R.O.S. BOOK 16 PAGE 260 R n 62.50 A : 6°2 1. L=4 EXISTING MONUMENT IN CASING 100' o �I 100 ti R:62.50 V TCJ �1 / � �[ [,/�/�ZZL(�[ L1L/ fzz-,L� L:60.70 CITY OF EDMONDS FILE (P-I-89) AFB9geisoo79 SW61NG SITE,PLAN FOft `SAN. SEWER EASEMENT _ AF 8212035005 R.O.S. BOOKK 166 PACE 258 HARBOR---- S(aWE �ASSQCIATES PACE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE IN GOV'T. LOT.-3, SEC. 23�"EWF 27•N','RNG. ,� E.:_ W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS. `SNOPdMISH-•_COUNTY,_ WASHJNGTON THIS BINDING SITE PLAN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR - UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LAWS GOVERNING r- REGISTRATION AT THE REQUEST_OF HARBOR SQUARE ASS.QC�IIE.5- ?._19o3133rJ Air:. IV..5i:iic 301 THIS �DAY OF-nA t/17F 18&9 .. 2ynmv0 3doJ,L1iC Z5036 - - `- /� 200/775-33 �Ic-�cr�-4S. NO. 7892 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYPE DRAWI c...... DATE I riuDea. scAiE- PLE NO. _ RAH RLS IAUG.1989!544 9544A ID = 5ff 22_-89 -" SHEET y I 3 W Z J v MPRSP�Po �P 5 A0� 9 UNo�NEvC I� v• 1 T P. 0. B. P SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 23 ARE SPED I 04, a Approved as to compliance with Contract Rezone recorded with the Auditor of Snohomish County Under receiving number 8005060198 and adoption by the Edmonds City Council on August 1,1989 of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation to approve the Binding Site Plan. RCW 58.17040(4). k4A � L Plonn n Director, City of Edmonds Port Manager, Port of Edmonds Harbor Square Associates Beselin Hovde Associates By Kenneth A. Hovde,General Partner f�F#89o8/5sao i 0 M F3 O 0 0 O Z BUFFER 780 SQ. FT. R=25' DAYTON ST. i6" E 524.29 _ )0 SQ. FT. 315.00 LEASE AREA No.2 LEASE AREA No. 6 9 7 LEASE AREA `-d 88°42' 06" W 422.56 ROAD SOUTH OF`PROPERTY 337..42 7,692 SO. FT. 125 i I >i a _. UNDEVQ.OPED AREA z I y [15,90 SQ.Fj. ` I I ------ - r 10' PUBLIC WALKWAY \cs'n ,.0, EXISTING MONUMENT IN CASING "" I s 9/° // 3y, O49 /�', F No. 3 12.512.5 100' No. 9 N 88° 51' 06" W, 3 I C6 i 100' F 'Bi k. - S 34°46' 26"W, 26.58\ \ N 38°41' 23" W, 42.67 / yFo,�`SOO\Oscgo \ N 72°45' 26" W, 56.29 / 00, Acknowledgement 00., eGc \ N 60° 26'57" W, 42.69 State of Washington /q �Fq County of Snohomish 2j2\. 2 N 70°54' 41" W, 30.04 e� L -Nps O cT�-- 04g2S � �r °t p kZ �a£F�M'O� t�AO�.._- I certifythat I know or have satisfactory 0 F S—,1 4 Y O \ 64.96 lN� (2�1�: 13goo - AF_ OF EDMONDS FILE (P-1-89) evidence that Kenneth A. Hovde signed this sg° O OR G7° document, on ooth stated that he is authorized 00"W �-----� S J to execute the document and acknowledged it 110.00 _ _BIfvDING SITE_.PL4N FOR as the general Partner of Harbor Square Associates, Nee°30'00" W HAR BOF� SQUARE ASSOCIATES Beselin, Hovde Associates to be the free and voluntary PORT OF EDMONDS act of such party for the purpose of the Binding Site SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, IN GOV'T. L6T�3, SEC 23;'LWP 2T�tl', RNG. 3�•, W.M. PROPERTY AS RECORDED UNDER A.F. N0. - Plan. 8311185013 IN VOLUME I8OF SURVEYS ON CITY OF EDMONDS, `-SNO'F70MISH-- COUNTYr _ VASHINGTON PAGE 169. r ■ Not Public and for th r ioa}t33rd :}... rirSu ", - Y State of Washington resident zoai=z' 50 O 50 100 in Lynnwood o«aw« c«cc.E° °•.e .ie�o ss scs�r l M appointment expires 6/I/S2 SCALE FEET �_- -ILE N2- -89 021 Y PP P RRR 01 a nur_iefloaeeoaeen I"=SrT Z_ 41 ._LEASE AREA-i-'' That port4oTi of Ggverrimenf-4,01: 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, N.M., described as_tollows: ComF ncing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and t-Ire easterly right-of-;Zy line of the Burlington Northern Railroad, thenee N42°34'34_'E-a-I q_said right-of-way line 1138.43 feet to the True Point of $eginning of.this description. f th"toe -colt tinuirug. N42°34'34"E.198.94 feet to a point 4 0. 0 feet Southwesterly of the centerline -of Dayton5treet as.measured at right angles thereto; thence S58817'06"E _U:TB_taet,- - thence S88°42'Q61I` 64.j4'"feet; thence Sl°17"54"W 16.1:49 fee t:.0o- a poiof curre to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence southerly along the& rc oL said curve �t'hrougtr-a•_cehitral angle.of 41°16'40",. an arc distance of:18.0 feet; thence S42°34'34"W 106.B2 feet; _ f - thence N47°25'26"W 178.10-f6TY15'the Trurelo_int of Beg inmi;rg: LEASE AREA 2 - - - That portion of Government trot 3, Section 23, Township 27 _ - North, Range 3 East, W.M., in Snohomistf-,Countr," ttashingson,' - described as follows: - - Commencing at the intersection of the South line of section 23.--- and the Easterly right of way margin of the BurIingtorr-Nortlre7n Railroad; _ _ - THENCE North 42.34'34" East along said right of way line:i337.37_-- feet to a point 40.0 feet Southwesterly of the centerline of _ Dayton Street as measure-] at right angles thereto; THENCE South 58"17'06" East 17.18 feet; THENCE South 88°42'06" East 89.51 feet to the True Point ol'% Beginning; �-----' ' THENCE South 88.42'06' East 290.00 feet; THENCE South 01"17'54' [test 135.20 feet; THENCE South 43"51'06" East 23.20 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet; ti - THENCE Southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90"00'00' an arc distance of 39.27 feet; THENCE South 46"08'54' crest 194.96 feet to a point on a curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet; THENCE Westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90"00'00', an arc distance of 39.27 feet; THENCE North 43'51'06' Crest 178.17 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet; THENCE Northerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 45.09'00', an arc distance of 19.70 feet; THENCE North 01.17'54• East 181.85 feet to the True Point of Beginning. LEASE AREA 3 LEASE AREA 4B That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern `iilroad; thence N42°34'34"E along said right-of-way line 711.37 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing N42°34'34"E, 427.06 feet; thence S47°25'26"E, 69.06 feet; thence S42°34'34"W, 161.00 feet; thence 549°48'50"W, 204.76 feet; thence 577°05'03"W, 76.37 feet to the True Point of Beginning. LEASE AREA 5 That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence N42°34'34"E along said right-of-way line 1138.43 feet; thence S47°25'26"E, 203.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence N24°34'34"E 66.59 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 25.0 feet. Thence Easterly along the arc of said curve �-__through a central angle of 93°34'20", an arc distance of 40.83 feet; thence S43°51'06"E 168.33 feet to a point of curve to the right having S radius of 25:90-feet; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve through a ?ventral %gle of 90°00'00", an arc distance of 39.27 feet; th_eoee"9gti6°OS'54_"W1r52.89 feet to a point of curve to the right having 5 radius of 25.1)0; thence Westerly along the arc of said curve through a centrai-angle of 100°47'41", an arc distance of 43.98 feet; thence _tL3.3°03'25"W.363.60 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 25.M_Teet; tKEKe Northerly along the arc of said curve through a _-.antral angle of 75°3Z'59", an arc distance of 33.00 feet, thence N42°31'34"l; SS'.W feet to True Point of Beginning. '_tEASE _.AREA--6' AND i Tget�portion of Government lot 3. Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M.,--described a;_fvTlows: Commencing at the int_erfection of the south line of said-Sectiorr 23, and the easterly right -of -wry line of -the Burlington Northern ITdilroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way Tine N42°34'34'E, 616.37 feet; thence N71°00'00"E, 4Q1:04 feet; thetVr_S37°00'O0'f, 260.00 feet; thence N46°17'54"E, 70.00 feet;-tfience S43°42'06"E, TeO.00 feet; thence S88°42'06"E, 265.36 feet;-itience N43°51'il&V, 17.72 tiet to the,•True Point of Beginning; thence N43251'06"W, 109,W-Teet; thence-1,146°08'54"E; 140.00 feet; thence N43°51'06"W, 199,.'09 feet; V ence S46°0454"W, 295.05 Feet to a point of curve to the left having at. radius of -2b:40'feet; That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W. Thence southerly along said -rurve through a central -•angle of.79 12 19' an arc described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Sectio distance of 34.56 feet; thence-33303'_25'_E,-39.T4 feet thence 543242'06"E, 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; ifie 59.02 feet to a point of curve to feft having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence along said easterly right-of-way N42°34'34"E 616.37 feet; thence easterly along said curve through a rAntral arigle-tif f79,95'13" in arc thence N7l°00'00"E 401.09 feet; distance of 14.91 feet; thence S88°42'06"E,," 252.82-feet to Tru,s Paint of thence 537°00'00"E 260 feet; Beginning. _ thence N46°17'54"E 70.00 feet; .- ----------- thence S43°42'06"E 120.00 feet; __-- ___r thence 588°42'06"E 422.56 feet to a point on the west right-of-way line of SR 104 thence Nl°08'54"E 311.20 feet; thence N43°51'06"W 14.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence Nl°08'54"E 237.42 feet; thence N41°39'17"W 102.22 feet to a point of 40.0 feet south of the centerline of Dayton Street. thence N88°42'06"W parallel with said centerline 118.15 feet; " "'- thence Sl°17'54"W 124.80 feet; thence S43°51'06"E 265.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning; LEASE AREA 4A That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.H., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence N42°34'34"E along said right-of-way line 1138.43 feet; thence S47°25'26"E, 69.06 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence S47°25'26"E, 109.04 feet; thence S42°34'34"W, 168.00 feet; thence S77°05'03"W, 238.00 feet; thence N49°48'50"E, 204.76 feet; thence N42°34'34"E, 161.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. --ff.9F Fr9DS l5.Sewl Legal Discriptions LEASE AREA 8 That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of said Section 23. and the easterly Tight -of -way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; Thence along said easterly right-of-way line N42'34'34"E, 616.37 feet; Thence N71'00'00"E, 401.09 feet; Thence S37'00'00"E, 260.00 feet; Thence N46'17'54"E, 70.00 feet; Thence S43-42'06"E, 120.00 feet; Thence SS8'42'06"E, 265.36 feet; Thence N43'51'06"W, 127.62 feet; Thence N46'08'54"E, 140.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence N43'51'06"W, 199.09 feet; Thence N46'08'54'E, 155.91 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 10.00 feet; Thence northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 90'00'OO" an arc distance of 15.71 feet; Thence S43'51'06"E, 162.90 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 45'00'00", an arc distance of 39.27 feet Thence SO1'08'54"W, 102.00 fur, Thence N88'51'06 W. 20.00 feet Thence N43'51'06"W, 59.15 feet Thence S46'08'54"W, 65.00 feet; Thence N43'51'06"W, 8.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. LEASE AREA 9 That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 23. Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described as follows: Commenc- ing at the intersection of the south line of sai.1 Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way line N42°34'34"E, 616.37 feet; thence N71°00',3"E, 401.09 feet; thence S37°00'00"E, 260.00 feet; thence N46°17'54"E, 70.00 feet; thence S43°42'06"E, 120.00 feet; thence S88°42'06"E, 265.36 feet; thence N43°51'06"W, 17.72 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N43°51'06"W, 109.90 feet; thence 1146°08'54"E, 140.00 feet; thence S43°51'06"E, 8.00 feet; thence N46°08'54"E, 65.00 feet; thence S43°51'06"E, 59.15 feet; thence 588°51'06"E, 20.00 feet; thence SO1°08'54"W, 125.41 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence south- westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90°09'00", an arc distance of 78.67 feet; thence N88°42'06"W 84.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. UNDEVELOPED AREA That portion of Govemmcnt Lot 3, Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., described a follows: Commencing at the intersection of the south line of Section 23, and the easterly right-of-way li,lc o.' the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said easterly right-of-way line, N42'34'34"E 616 37 feet thence N71'00'00"E 401.09 feet; -therice.S34'00'00"E 260.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N46'17'54"E 70.00 feet; thu4tcc S43'.4Z'06"E 120.00 feet; thency-1588'43196"E 422.56 feet to the right-of-way of SR 104 �as'condcmned.tihdcr•S.C.C. N. 10637 thenc401708'54"W-along said right-of-way a distance of 237.46 feet; tkrncc S73-00100"W 24(160 feet; thenceN88-30'00"W 110.Wfe,t-, tlicncc N66:0 WV0 140.00 fee!; t thegre4gA0'O0.QT V4 125.00 feoc, -hence NQ1-00'00"W 200:00 feet to the Tine Point of Beginning. ' CITY OF EDMONDS FILE (P-1- 89) - AF B9o�/Sa�79 -.-..BIND ING"SIT E.P-LAN POR HARBOFr SQUAREASSOCIATES IN GOV'T. LbT. 3, SEC-2,3,_-TWP.127 RNG. 2_€., W.M. /J CITY OF EDMONDS, `SNOH_ OMISI+--COUNTY, WASHINGTON ._ 19031-33rd Ave. l�', Suite 301 .. . 'Lynrnvuod, LVA 9S036 - - 206/r'S BROW" CREc"E. D"TE FIEIOB" sc°EE'NE_ FTLEN0. _ BBB RLS AUG.1989I544a544A NO:" U. E 021 - t - ---- Oo R `77`'`7R4w7 Inv NOTE: Side Sewer To* Locations In Dayton 80 0 are from City records and should be capped AN tt5 Field Vorifled for Location 8 Depth Off \0'(\ to V. 4-81,00 ko- � oat Existing San. Manhli Inlets Detail 11, 1 1V t le4 0 —/_F771:1 SANITARYlSEWER GENERAL 140TES f 1. All onstruction shall conform to the "Standard Specifications for Municipal Public WOrks Cons tructi on"tand standard plans as adopted by the City of Edmonds, and any requirements established at City hearings on this project. 4f, 1981 Edition. 2. All construction is subject to the inspection by the City of Edmonds and the Contract(�)r shall notify the City of their schedule in sufficient time to permit inspecti6n prior to and during the work. 3. The contractor shall be responsible for the installation of side sewers (laterals and tees) and the placing of 2 x 4 markers with the length and depth of the laterals and tees;inscribed on the markers. 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Edmonds Department of Public Works in time to permit inspection of the side sewers. i 5. Upon completion of the site improvements and underground utilities, the Contractor through I'lis Consulting Engineer shall furnish an as -built plan to the City of Edmonds which inclicates. the location of all site improvements including side sewer laterals or tees.1 6. The Contractor shall arrange for and make air tests of sanitary sewer and sewer connectiq�ns under the supervision of the City Engineer or his designated representa- tive. 7. PVC pipe shall conform to the provisions of ASTM D 3034, SDR 35; and have two (2) feet of cover minimum. 8F Y"C' a nd ABS shall be bedded per APWA 61-2.03 Type 2, Flexible. 9. The C 6ntractor shall conform to the standard excavation specification per APWA 61-3, thr0gh 6 inclusive. 10. Existing underground facilities have been shown on this drawing for the purpose, of assisting the contractor in locating said facilities in the field. The contractor shall be 'responsible for checking actual field locations and checking with appropriate agencies that may have underground facilities within the project limits. The c . ontract6r shall be soley responsible for any damage to underground facilities resulting from his operations. Bench Mark TBM # I Elevation 14.19 Southwest Corner Telephone Vault 10+ East of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station South Side of Dayton Street. 75T+ East of R.R. Tracks. 0 TBM #2 Elevation 14.61 Fire Hydrant "M"in Muellar 250' East + of Telephone Vault. South side of Dayton Street. TMB #3 Elevation 13.52 Hub set at Fence Line 30'+ South of South Road (Project) Adjacent to SR 104 R/W. — Datum,, City of Edmonds MLLW. If. Top elevations of all Manholes and C I eon outs are approximate. The Contractor shall allow for 1.5'adjustment I max. up or down of elevation shown on plan. Final Top Elev's. will be set when site paving is blue topped, I APPROVAL: sanitary Sewer Plan and Notes this .. day of sue1982-. J' City JEng ineer Ed man d s, Wa shington 'r" ' r'. z P"'CI R I LAYTO T I � � 11) wA� M!`,kPU�) I/4." I i r `�� i (1n� IJP•�f * >�: �{�J ' hI 1 �jC AL 41 12, ARS'.. �� X%�� 'At 14Ako Mir Vrz: *X(:5'j."' hide I / - '�f��4-aY��1��A "f'��•MihlAl.I � - l CaAL r ' 10 CARSrS X (115) MAOC3WIA 46?U1 l-IUMt I I - I� � Ia" (t�`,a f.xlJ��N�� I►�, , ,: I 6, 0% t fi t o.%L;'A':„r 1X/ i co APR 15 1988 i ZONE S-TBACKS: FRONT SIDE SITE u 1 VI I =; � : � :r OTHE HEIGHT . i i i r . 1 { j i � .. on a� py ■. 01 t11111 4 . �� '� /~~ /-` �^- r-' ,-� r'\� ` '-� '/-`- ~` �^-� '- . . ` '_ �~ � /-- �� /_` � ' //^ . . ' _-.. � `''� K~�.� /\�.�� / � | `^ � ' v^~- / ' -__-~� ' / \ `-/_ \j �_- ,_� �` .� \` � �-`