1100 12TH AVE N (3).pdfi
am
CITY OF EDMOND_
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICATIOtI FOR VARIANCE
FILE
.DATE I_.�
FEE $25.00
REC'T #jAkz
HEARING DATE:_. ' IS -
APPLICANT:, ' .ADDRESS '�I'Z �K J_jH� �kly�� PHONE: _7?4-4(033
Indicate type or degree of interest in the property:
OWNER: GJhESrtr2UG .ADDRESS: -Sly'C�tL` Iy PHONE:
4(03�
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) __I I Do_ 2rtN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: P��-�l�N �C` "i(�G�S
�ucr" a U O � IM A6
f,
VYI ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHEC;:ED & APPROVED
USE ZONE: By Planning Department
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:
Ors, L..'� 3 �.o �.cs�, o�n•
('
VARIANCE REQUESTED:_—T��—
i
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED:
1T l5 l C`
A V^%14NCC
� � �-GA- vSE O
�: 1�G
-t-4 RE -
� 1 �
STATE OF WASHINGTON)ss. i nature o App icant, Owner or epresentatiJv�e)
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publi in and for th State -0f ,who,
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
duly sworn, on his/ oath deposes and says that 44he as prepared and read the fore -
being Y
goingstatements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained
ior therein
the pare
true,
and has signed this instrument as his/bw� free and voluntary act
and deedses
therein mentioned. _zf � 19�.m �
Subscribed and sworn to before me this____J__=day of
residing at
f�otary Public in and Arth�eState of Washington.
POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property
which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
C7e"'_t(9 c` VY1 l l* F IF I t `FI 1 S A
1 L
ft
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in
which my property is located because:
S o H I "�W
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue
to the.owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond -his control because:
-
On .,� (i � 12 1 --( /l a�1 1.! tom" (� f-%,4-�L.� ! _�4�.-/�F, 1 G-�K- f��✓�QL f .
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in-
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located.
1 E Wi L�L M AkE SU Q ALs
i
-- �L,Q-C � �i-o �? �� S � l I `� s (.� 1 � �. r'►i iq- X l �? !J�'J? t/ I L`'" 60
w 77-�O
bU
hNam=oU/U0 - A-7 �h
r
Record of Fir.-.s of Fact by Board of Adjust. ,nt
h
The Board of Adjustment for the City
of Edmonds finds in the case of
n , File No. L 6 / 11 request t for variance at
the following:
din to Code requirements , and Affidavits attesting to same
1. That notice was given according
are in the file. been met.
he foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have
2. That t g ! 1
3. In addition thereto,
i
4. Therefore, the request for variance 1s.t0ea/
Granted, subject
to the following special F
condi ti oils:
5. Section 12.16.110 ----and if a building permit t and/or occupancy Fermi t i s not obtained
sub�ect property within one year from the date Sul lhand voids-decision, the con -
for the J
ditional use permit or variance shall be automat ca y
6.., Decision shall be effective on: Uate
DATED �� �� Q7� - �Ca rman�%B rdof Ad tment
DATA
Date of Nearing: E i
Date of Application:
Date of Publication:_ C
Continuances: 1:1
Date of Posting. ;2 . —:-
Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board:
t
i
Secre ry, [hoard of A ustment
,I
r
0 vo
V,a� , i /) �7 -a. ",F. .
r, ._. ----__ .___..__-_- __.__-_._.._.._-
. .
.
., {4
or
♦yyyyyy''r:;i1 •I\ I r4.i ,rl Iqr 1r-Iy '�Ir rt`(Ti 11111J M»n+ 1 1�' �I'� I II 1�f MN,. 1 'iti } tl- C,1 "� t` �i
��V (.�[I A II �4{j1{.•, } J* r+.: I. 1• loony JY 1 S u } V r'ed 1
lr 1 v ti 1 1 l ' V I p i V I rl, l C f
I II I 'rl Kt. •'t 1 .� 1 •i I +(' .;'� ♦ i I 21 Ib I
�{ 1 9 l I �1 '! 1 ', 4 F \- Y
J 4 I
t �. A v r r I,• , t l a F �`` I T t,-
.[ I {11 ,I `I. t i r 4 1 III iaR �"i%'y, ' tYi t�0.
1 t I'• rd,L Y ;`S i N 1 ,I r .'I' l I,J .
t r.. N t , .,i • '' 1 II • q 1 IY I � ij i'
t t 1 1 ' a j, f I. r,...
v - 4 r' 10 Ii 411 1 11 r
5 Iy Y r i r Ii' • y{�.
dr,
d Jat I`:�
r .\ I 1 t 1 I: I{ J
• r Ir e L �., I Y ; `t Y` t, '•I 3"}tdd: C'
` LI¢. •�,
tit1 Ir
} I v Vt C Y }ti J �I M1 1? f 1Adr., I rn`,1 I. 1�'r:
, f ( V Y III
di Ih + I ` , .'e 1 1 I.k IdAdl Y f} Illl .y 1 1 Y,
f Ak % 1 rOd ,� %,,tk1 S / 1 'S L.11 I ! I ),. /' % I ` t U¢ I , r Jr,rt I �•�
i I tyr ti1i pYI: 1. '�It r I r - - - ti f r, �a,, :. Y. 41 JS '�� �,� t.1t(rt jI �;
t 11f1 I + C I ji i. + 1 1 ,a ,iY.: 4 V \' • , j`_''; -
f or y n I Q54f jj { \ •. \ ll J 1 1 :IA 4 I.
FI U Y - 1 - s ,I t i ✓ hl 1. 1 ,t. j.
f I 11 4 a� t 1� ,. r I I�., J< Y (I Y t t,.
f4 rylr J: ♦ �r I r tP i I t. , rA vfY �r:41 f� i.
r{ t tk Y I� 1 } ! I I r` 1 r 4
F I1 I li.I I Y Il 1'. p °i'' J f : 1 .r I HI t \j I e
4 i J I II 4� � 4 J i Yti.' I I I.n ry.. 17 d r n qq-.
D I I{!i`A�•�f�Y rhry ASiJ �1 I rd o \ S f :� I k{ t,l wIYr 11
4 Ay tV�111 '! .ry Jf .I1 ,4 rA ! I0 vI II tl i� 1
) tI f.' Its I1 ti, t js 15� S
\ Y I' y Iy Y I I( r I�R
R { yr t 4.I I y l; i R r ` )j{�' ' y y 'v ,t Y Y I < f� f I _�
t1 I ' 3 1 �'4 Ur r-_ 1.' I x l ( P -t 1 y
1 II Y 4 r, YOi 1 I{
I {Y Ly \{1 s _.�1 r ,. 1.,. Y •�.t , I y 141` 1 / 4,1y-
�, I . In 1jl (; ,. CJ i:A I �, e .J .4
t( I f I 12 c , 1 I , .1 1. I Ivry•L. 6 F
v 4 t _, I.'.y, I a I t
[.
I.
Q r l li ItIA •II •t LI Yn It 1; •, .1 I - r A
} C t i I y I r 1 r. �,�{ - Y 4 aL. �U v , fry _ z o .I .
r i. 1 jCt: IE 4 I J t �Y I5 4 P. 1 .f'"'�^'
,( s. :iv I ` ` n Ir
F I{ }iI\r 5.,) ',� tr , L 'i I .. I \ 5. i:j 4 • t .I , 1•:
I VI
J V ° ^jIv aA . 1ird
t L i I, 16 dr,7 „'1�.r+_a r l I r
{u vt�}'ti1 1 I 'r r' II
V..> y e1. - q; I '
F I y ! 1 I I . 1. ti '� I t,
p r L rb I a jf1 1 �Y I 1
7 • j 1. , r-> i> , II I
i I,II. 1 for +}/
,7 1 A' 1 f i Ii tJ .. '� i Z I o, S
�S i r� I I n• I I I' }
S �.
- I . I ir. V 1 .•r. I ,. h k i
Y A I11 I. L It Ilk j \ 1 I v
I ! I 4iY 1
it
! �, i - I I
A
4 .} y r
I C f! I(
- I I t :1
r i
n>
y%) 1.' J,1•
P 1 t
I
\jii: ,IL
} f r I.. iI
I
I tIl • I i
.
i
j r -.
.
. .-
I1. .`
`:
f
`..!
' f,
SO
oC�
3
ALA
Y
Li
F
a.awT,. ... vw+�.v.... - � , .� . ++�I'.If"1Cw/V�H1 •r"'�`� -^.�. � �� .... r...� w � •
4
\
l - ••
I µ
� 4
Mi
NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
FOR VARIANCE )Q=ftWL)&iVa�
BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the
15th day Of February 19 7R , has been set as the
date for hearing petition filed by A CanructionCompany
for a' variance - t to allow addition of
2 houses on private road.
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment
and all interested persons are invited to appear.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
FILE NO: V-6-7S
PUBLISH: 2-1-78
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
j Notice of Hearing Petition
ss. File NO. v-6-78
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
Rose Sellers . being first duly
sworn on oath, deposes and states:
Thatshe bqx is the legal clerk
of the Edmonds Tribune Review, a weekly newspaper.
That said newspaper is -a legal newspaper of general
circulation and it is now and has been for more than
six (6) months prior to the date of publication here-
inafter referred to, printed in the English Language
continuously as a weekly newspaper in Edmonds, Snohomish
County, Washington, and it is now and during all of the said
time was published.in an office maintained at the afore-
said place of publication of said newspaper. That the said
-Edmonds Tribune Review was approved as a legal newspaper
by the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington.
Court Order No. 38282.
That the annex is a true copy of a legal notice
as it was published in, a regular issue (and not in
supplement form) of said newspaper once a week for a
period of 1 consecutive weeks, commencing on the lstday of
February , 19 78 and ending on the day of
19 both dates inclusive, and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of the aforesaid period. That the full amount of
the fee charged for the foregoing publication in the sum of
$ 3,00 , has been paid in.full, said charge being based
on the rates allowed by statutes of the State of Washington.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this
1st day of February 19 78
NOTUBLIC in and for the State of
Wasliington, residing at Lynnwood
J
.1%f.f +( .'t1' Lt�• �,f1 4 �1 C r r { r G J r� ', , r , '1 { ,'�' i , y. r x { wtjtl L +. / 1 � �1 tl+ •, r1+Y rl �+tj D y f
+4,�t{C 'i1 jY nu1 �'�i tly t .vet 1'lfv'I�y N`�.�. ,r�r ,iyl6 �<i alt S'• f{ N=Inr t
//'' .{ t„ r 1 ) , u♦ 4y ,tll.:.t. i ! 1'1 4 , Yi+i r I ' ' lM .i,, tw. ` T
1 , ^yp. •`1, .r Yi. , .. '{ r 4 Dti J 1 4 r r, I rl(,t/
Y t( � f1i�i, t5. t'4r ,.7ti( t i t t I •` I�,a '
>3'IN.t 1�jR ��:! `s4 '�: r!�:s�•�tr yyt?f4 i(tj�lf t v. �tl\'Jti
LIC0
i+F �' if j ` 'X�r ^`�! 1. • r JN �....\' {'. rr.Yi `�, � •1a'!'Z, 7/.f M` � ;t: -, ,,.• Ij i �t ' /t .: '�"' .1 Lr '' rr D,'f. i.,,.
r +� ti n Ir'
rk
i rl
.NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT'A' r.
EhYWILL BE HELD BY.• THPUBLIC HEARING
I `• a 1 @r `1U {"•' t: r �`,1 ,F S 'y t / •f.. rr + . dt sr ' h� 7 r'tlr '7r ' • � r !e �': j •, 'ti* 7 . / , .. :. 4 r "'�, ',. ''Y �ii t.t y, •�f id '1 r r1l b f )<� i .f,. 1' .'• n
•�.L,..s'\tir'�:;' �•' �' .. , ii til+' ij Ja<., tf., . c^. ,cY;i'tTr+S�/i,.:J�k1r�,°s,' r l�iY i. 54 r•�.rt {,fr��,,�.1� yF,+� }�'r, ,Y 1. '�''
i.1 ', a tk<, \` t t-�f � 'f a a,r,• qt Dr n�Lf',t.,',S u �•: 'L J,.Ni. ,� ..I r ft n 'fi Q '•
F 4r. • • • • • • • • :.a.r•• . • •..• • • r^rt}g.
, ,� � Yit�'+trC�M,'�; (r;�Y�.�r.
r '`..n l;+ r,. e,r at
,N-tTAPPLICATION ' HAVING BEEN FILED, FOR • .�
,`y,{� ]tv) s �I; . , . ,yf''• r'{tslf �r, i .. .. �• t � 53j +((yly
ei'* ��.µ�.tt,.t ,J1 rr :' ... , { , �, t' I , s ra. t, f xt �- � 155 �9�•tr •.
� tr ,i .- •. .. Yl': _ Us.�;wait'/�1s'�'(r}X�za�it`r�t�F�s,Q�•tYh�F{f.. b�:
-
rIMIt
YZ.i1i�'`y�f�
p,y "� fN u ..a -4. '[ , {, ,r 1.: (i t41 :,f.,�[ '91'J *f ��.,• Qti.
tG'F' i,+-�',.y, f} rI ufi ti' fY"1[ '':� • , ., ' ,, , ., + ' ] 9s y, 1 .ifi tip i 4i5 ti.# , 1' !SZ� � l
r t t a
�' iY ,af ri ,: ♦.l.t1 l���t�M1.`��Tl, �`.�� ' Yr'.1 ( ' i
a.,d'• < ! t ' 1 {•. ♦♦<,, e.',F a'vYL' 1Y < ;;',iN`('� �1,K.4:p M.
'ROPERTY: DESCRIPTION' OR ADDRESS:
y\' •cN��,if�'j'Ut`l �. ; - l L a%y��, � ,� . • )�. . ✓? a�1�♦�J� 7.
y �yJ.( J-5 .. .. r :• r,�,, :I , t ' 1-7•j)_'Y�r' -,'
i>•r 1+
M�t" 1„ 1 1 K
qqapp. 't�!•.,; � N� a - � .. \f, +' h+ < y { ti!>_ fT7 .3���t`I�,}d Y .
4^ y} u' Y + . t ! , I,ytit 1 1 '.,�J'fJG'�,us�
U •rr. '!:r 1T t , `frt,
:ONE CLASSIFICATION • .. ,': ,
• •.1 • • • •� • . • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • •yy :•Vj• ))•J• o-•` • • • • • • •fit• •'.• i'•
t t� .j =ta !"' I • ;�" ) I '.� ': ,t, 4�"f `l4t:rr$�f 47 Twt r i't:' > j r{� ��. ( j
. r� ,.tom .,� ti ,t r r. �r�.• .�'. �V/ (�. !
ATE OF .HEARING.�4 .���•. ..e..... ... .T..�.�.. 5�. , ..., .�. D ;: �i
l+�Y�rNw a TI E h DAY f%�'r ;r�r"k�i'DATEi;,,'
�t :�T., .,.�i r� { .':,_+. i. n • t �{r Af!„ t�,+r V,i�7j ^."'t �}�N.(�' uQ Y,y�in
r•a. L�' ,K��,�:1�Y ;� Y -' ' y>at t t:t•, 't�, vl'}ihrr F �4yi4�rC �xLl `i j ,,
r ir,C , ..•'.'Y''.
,�, L •� KIN, : a v t , ri`r. � � ?t� ,•r. � r�.ft:5 . , �' f
rHE'MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS 0177HE EDMONDS;CIVIC
ENTER,";5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET. ANY PERSON' INTERESTED°1-IN ;`THIS
PROPOSAL` MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO` IT ,, COMMENTS'
CONCERNING '; THE I APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR' To r'�OR �"AT � E s
MEETING, ,IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ' ADDITIONAL iNFORMATIOW'MAXP*13E
OBTAIN ED-'AT'THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 `EXT:ny227) t',IN':�THE
EVENT; THE -AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE` DATE;:THE""PUBLIC
HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR 'MEETING AT.:;,THE,SAME
TIME AND PLACE.
7 ED.. ; r> �,ft,FILE NO PUBLISH
, tf
yC/L'q•,�,y'
�•-.L u' j'�if' t��'f'-1L / r .1`' 1 r + !'+K ".4! J• V 3
,>y�i a'+•.{Tt ,�•�r a... - r'• J I. !, t r rij i;t `- `�} iy r .
J +' The removal, mutilation, 'destruction,':'orY
concealment of this notice prior to the date'••
® of the hearing is a misdemeanor punishable=!
by fine and imprisonment:,;`jJ`;"
r
k °) FILE NO.V-6-78
APPLICANTA-B Constr. Co
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH-)
Mary Lou Block being first duly sworn,
RECEIVED
I T1' OI DM0NDS :
DEC 231977
ENGINEERING REQUIRE`ILNTS Fs 2 Pld\TS A3110 SUBDIVISIONS City of Edmonds
HEARING DATE *VV.r
�-Xt r.
light -of -way:
Pimp P+rie A For- 'Tv X A �r,.o u,jo X'T
FAA op a-zVT4 Ave' PER ATU'c.AM sv elc"
?aving and Curbs -
PgAv o'v5' "bloribrUwL. Prtvl" 01,
Turn Around:
Sidewalks & Planting Strip:
Access Easements:
Z0 r.,00 r Att e5S U&, IEM "7
Mater Mains:
Ex S'r41JG
Fire Hydrants:
5 XI CPT pi C
IC987J'r,:�
5uppic.1 15,41
1.
2,
3
4
C
rA
Sewers or Septic Talks: E
Gowj ec-(104 or -
Drainage: b- tATS "r�
Install all necessary st.onn se
wers c
°'*and drainage facilities per ordinance 1924 Q
approved drai.nnpe nlan. More dr.ainas;es . across pri,
property, all parties having any ownbrship interest
in the lands being platted shall provide, as a
restriction on the plat rtmning with the land,
that the City of Edmonds shall be. held harmless
from any and all claims for damages i-rhich may be
occasioned to adjacent land by reason QE the
construction and operation of the drainage system,
Community De"4 De;*.,,
FILE NO. ' %o -??
REQ' n M:Q' [_l
PRI OR TO PRIOR TO COt KE
RECORDING BLDG PEP, L POSTED
N
t1 t
1 iJ
x
i
z
�
1k .
t
t
r - P,
e
,, to
tr
r �t�
I
M
W ' ...
ENGINEERING RFQUIR01LNTS POR PLATS AND SUBDLVI;IONS
,Page Three
ENGINEERING A111INISIT.ATIVL P.EQUTRI7ILNTS
In accordance with the platting rules and regula-
tions of the Edmonds City Code, the sponsor or
.,-the application shall advise the City Engineer, in
'writing within 21 days of the above date, the method
,of'assuring performance for the installation of site
improvements. Improvements: Improvements to be
provided by the developer shall conform to Section
12.08.350 of'the Edmonds City Code and to the fore-
going list of engineering requirements.
Subdivision Ordinance No. 1703, Section 6. Section
12.10.060 Application and Foes: (d) I--kiblic Improve-
ment Inspection Fee - An inspection fee in the amount
o .2 percent of the estimated construction cost'
;for the public improvements shall be provided sub
sequent'to the approval of the development and
engineering plans by the.tngineering Dcpartment.
Alternate method of providing, site improvements
are as` :follows :
1. y furnishing the City of Edmonds with a per-,
'fonnance bond satisfactory to , the City Engineer,
in which assurance is given .the City that the. -
installation of the miniMUM improvements will be
carried out as provided in Section 12.08.350 of the
Edmonds City Code. The amount of bond shall cover
110 percent of the Fngineers' estimate .o£ public
works;and.utility improvements
By actual installation of impprovements in
accordance with the provisions of Section
12.08.350 and in accordance with the installation
requirements and under the supervision of the City
Engineer.
;Regardless of the method emhlovcd by the developer
for the installation ofimprovements. 'Tb improve-
ments shallbefinally accepted by the City of
Edmonds until the developer furnishes the City
with a bond in the amount of 1.5 percent of the
cost of said improvements to guarantee said :im-
provements against defects in worlanaiisliip wid/or
materials for a period of two (2) years from the
date of such final acceptance."
Also, before final acceptance, an as -built drawing
::of site improvements shall be submitted. Uy the
developer's engineer and approved by the City
Engineer.
rt
,eta ffl ;
,
11
t i
RF:QD RFQ ! D»
PRIOR TO PRIOR 11) COP t )LETEI) .,
RRCORDIPIG I3LM PEICMIT
POSTED
x
;I
ENGINEERINU REQui R)✓:•11;NT5 ► % PLiVFS MR) Still]) i V 1 '�I.ONS RR `j RE � n
i nn\rn
Page.Four I'I;lnit IO PRt01? TO CO! tPLETF:I)
RECOP.I),ING RLDG 111 ITT POSTE)).:
The City Engineer will review p.l.ans for iq)rovc- y,
ments, prior to the start of con.strtictiol. �;atify
the City Fngincer of the schedule of: cons tructLon ,.
prior to commencing; work ONO V,OIUK 11,111 Bl' UNIMIRTAUN �r
IN TIM PUBLIC RIGHT-017-11IAY UNCIL AUIIIORIZED BY 11IF z;
ENGINEERING DEPARRIENT)
rt
If you have any (tuestions concerning; the Above, ��s•'
please contact the City Engineer's office.
a.
r
b .
c
Gx"
r%
yr"
4.
1t
A;
r�
}�a
5-60-77
1.
i t
{.,
..Y
.. aC'1�iG1�T(,JCya��3JOt�1.JL•i"i.•'��:11�'Lt73p�1� i
250
P Ai-r
qz
1
1,. • A
PLANNER'S VARIA14CE REVIEW FORM
FILE # ID' I g
1 1 ' ♦ , � 1
io
Own —
VAIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100
•1. Does this amount to a rezone?.�.��5
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or ircumstances not g erally
lands in the same district?
• - A. . • - • - - - - - -�
livable to othe
(b Would trict enforcemen of the zoning code deprive the pro erty owner of ri is
commonly enjoyed -by other properties in the same district?
3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant?
4.
Are there unnecessary hardships and acti cal di ffi cul ti in cars ing out the
provisions of the zoning code?
5. Will the granting of the variance be detri ental to th health,.safet or welfare
of property owners in the vi ci ni ty? -� —
C�
eV% �,t,GQ-fiv 0
6. Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of 41a?
7. Will the gran ing of the variance generally be in armony an co tible with this
zoning code?
YY V
Planner's Variance Review 12/77
S- too- 11
s,uJo� xb
�'++.���.+-ear-.emu+-.-+���.�✓�.��++.��..`�
..
"..t��:��--`
- .
..
..
P
.
:stirs_
^'^�" k�r+.�✓n+ri�ra
� ..
..
February 10, 1978
MEMO TO: John LaTourelle, Director
Community Development Department .'
.FROM: Leif R. Larson, P.E.
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: AGENDA FOR EDMONDS-BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING FOR !
FEBRUARY 15, 1978
r`
The following is our comments on the subject agenda:
V-3-78, U-SAVE OIL COMPANY - The variance will not create
a safety problem, therefore, we recommend approval.
V-4-78, WILLIAM BECKER - No Comment.
V-6-78, A-B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - Recommend approval
subject to engineering requirements of S-60-77.
V-7 78, THOMAS HARVILLE - No Comment.
CU-7-78, GORDON HENRIKSON AND HOWARD WILSON - Recommend 1, }
approval. j
CU-8-78, THE HARBOR GROUP - Recommend approval.
CU-9-78, FRED S. EVE - We recommend approval subject to
requirements of Section_ 12.14.020 of City Code
L.
r;
WJN:ly
r
CITY 07- RONU-2NI[ S
i
.-., •.,. .,..,.. CIVIC CENTER • 6DMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206)775-2525
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
i
i
i
DATE:
1
March 2, 1978
I
ti
TO:
A.B. Construction Company
4
212 Skyline Drive
I
Edmonds, WA 98020
TRANSMITTING:
- Board O F Adjustment M i nutes
Re: V-6-78
AS YOU REQUESTED:
FOR YOUR' -INFORMATION:
X
j4.1AS WE DISCUSSED:
FOR APPROVAL.
f FOR YOUR FILE:
REVIEW AND CO124ENT
COMMENT AND RETURN:
MINUTES OF MEETING:
February 15, 1978
REMARKS:
V-4-78
Ford Fyock, tie applicant, indicated in the slides where the canopies
would be located. He said there also would be additional lighting.
The public portion of the hearing was then closed.
Mrs. Stole a pressed a concern that the canopies may create a sight
from 76th Ave. W.
obstruction or drivers going norahreedon Htigiataa sight obstruction would
This was disussed and generally g
not be created.het1r. Roy amenities�ofetheuproposalthat hso the �role of
wouldBoard
would rule on
was only to �ecide on the invasion rl the setback. !y
erlcor,cern was the
objections t the proposal. Mrs. Deth said her only
sight obstruction question, but she no longer thought there Mould be
a sight obstruction, and she felt the proposa•a netthe
APPROVE aV-3-78nce �BECAUSE
MRS. STOLE THE!•! MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. OERLE'
IT WILL, NOTIAh10UEAPPLICANT OF PRIVILEGES ENJOYED BYOTHERS
TTo A OBILEGESTRICT FlJALONGORCEMET OF TTHEHE CODE
WOULD DEPRIVE TI
HIGHWAY. MOTION CARRIED.
WILLIAM BE01R - Variance of 3.76' from minimum lot width requirement
on 71st Ave W., 170' north of 176th St. S.W. (RS-8)
This applic tion was in conjunction with a subdivision, but the variance
was request d only on Lot A: The minimum lot width requirement is 70'.
The area viaadequate for the subdivision but the lot %•iidth of Lot A
was substandard because of a required right-of-way dedication in
connection �,iith the subdivision of pro
perlicantty to tsesubdivisnorth bon.thMrsat
right-of-waly will also be used by the.app
Block said this would not amount to a rezone and, because of the loca-
tion of an existing home on Lot A,this was the most
out t practical
cotheglots
tion.for t e subdivision of the property.
could not be divided as proposed. Mrs. Block said this should have no
detriments effect on adjacent properties. She said there was one letter
in the fil from a Mrs. Yornby indicating no objection to the variance.
Mrs. Block said this was a minimum variance to allow subdivision of
this prope-ty in this manner, and the lots met the Subdivision Code
in all other respects. She showed slides of the site and recommended
approval. The public portion of the hearing was opened, no one wished
to speak, and the public portion was closed.
Mr. Roy felt this application met the variance criteria. lie noted
that density would not be increased, the lot size requirements were met,
and it wo ld deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by
other property owners in the area if this were denied as he would have
to have u usually large lots. THEREFORE, MR. ROY MOVED, SECONDED BY
MRS. STOLE, TO APPROVE V-4-78. MOTION CARRIED.
V-6-78 A-B, CONSTIUCTION COMPANY Variance to allow addition of two houses on
a private road at 1100 12th Ave. N: "(RS-12)
Mrs. Block stated that the Code requires that there be no more than
three homes served by a private easement. She said this application
was in conjunction with a subdivision and granting of the variance
would not amount to a rezone. Conditions not generally applicable to
other properties in the same district vrere that Lot A had been divided
under an earlier subdivision, using this access, and Lot B does not
have oth r access and is most logically served by this access. Strict
enforcem nt of the Zoning Code would prevent homes from being built on
these to s, there being no access without the use of tha Lotegial
conditio s had not resulted from the actions of the applicant
had been created by an earlier subdivision which used this access.
the roadway but
or
ber
The slitawas�J�determined that
ded
reasons
theate easement shown herefwasathemmost f
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 2 - February 15, 1978
.. ■
7
reasonable for these lots if developed to City standards. firs.
Block said the proposed access was the most practical method of
serving the two lots in question, and the access would be improved
to City Standards and the additional use should not be detrimental
to the other property owners. She said this was the minimum variance
that would allow access to two buildable lots. She felt the granting
of the variance would be compatible with the Zoning Code if the ease-
ment were improved to City standards. The Engineering Department had
recommended approval, subject to engineering requirements of S-60-77,
and Mrs. Block recommended approval. The public portion of the
hearing was opened.
Jim Barker, architect for the applicant, said the land is zoned RS-12
and each lot has the required 12,000 sq. ft. He said Lot A was granted
in 1966, and they were now submitting a subdivision for Lots B and C
and the subdivision had been approved, subject to approval of the use
.of the easement road. He said that apparently 10' of the street is
public street but the City really doesn't want it as a public street.
He said the Engineering Department had approved of this but said the
road would have to be up to their standards. Al Bols said.he lives
on the property bordering the south side of the private road. He
said the schoolchildren use the road for access to the school and
he felt it would only be fair for the developers to provide a route
for the children to use to get to school. Howard Olds said he was the
former owner of the subject property. He said there will not be more
traffic created by this proposal and the children using the property
to get access to school should be bussed. He said Mr.Bols enjoyed
an easement because he, Mr. Olds, had granted it to him and if he had
not granted it to him and other neighbors he probably could comply
now. Herman Michelson of 1107 12th Ave. N., the property to the south,
said he felt this matter should be tabled until the applicants could
submit. an accurate plot plan showing exactl.y where the houses would
be placed. He was concerned that parking could block the easement
road. Bill Meyring of 1101 12th Ave. N. said his main objection was
that the access was unsafe because of a utility pole in it. He said
there was only 15' available around the utility pole, and he felt the
pole should be moved. Bruce Brabeck of A-B Construction Co. said the
easement road would not be obstructed because there are setback require-
ments. He said he planned to build his home on Lot B. Jim Barker said
the placement of the houses had not yet been finalized and they would
be happy to get together with the neighbors on that. He said they
wanted to provide a view from each of the three houses. There was
further discussion regarding the utility pole, and then the public
I portion of the hearing was closed. �.
Mr. Visser felt more information was necessary before he could make L
a decision on this. Mrs. Stole disagreed. She pointed out that the
Board was not to be concerned with access for schoolchildren, with
placement of the houses on the lots, or with utility poles. She said
the Board's concern was the number of houses on a private easement.
Mr. Roy agreed with Mrs. Stole. He said the lane will be improved
to City standards and there are a lot of lanes in Edmonds. He had
looked at the site and said anyone can drive in there with care. He
felt it met the requirements. The public hearing was then reopened
because Mr. Meyring wanted to speak again. He said he opposed this
and if the variance were granted he would need .a variance to build
on the lower Lot B. He asked if that were true and he was advised
by the City Attorney that it was. Fie said he had subdivided according
to City standards, but Mr. Murphy said there had been intervening
subdivisions and that nade a difference. Mr. Murphy told him he was
sure his application would be approved, but other people were now
using that easement. There was further discussion from the audience
regarding the traffic and cars obstructing the easement. fir. Murphy
advised that the power of the Board is that it can make whatever
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 3 - February 15, 1978
V-7-78
i
conditions it wants as long as they are reasonable and in the public
interest. He said the goal here was to determine how many houses
could be allowed on this street. He advised the Board that it could
use such restrictions as "only if the PUD pole is removed" or "only if
the hydrant and meter are removed." He said as far as the locations
of the buildings,they are prescribed by the building envelopes in the
Zoning Code. There was some further discussion which was repetitive
of what had been said earlier, and the public hearing once again was
closed.
Mr. Roy said he felt this lane will be better than some that are in
the City. He did not feel it would be unsafe, and he•felt most of the
questions that had arisen were not the Board's concern. MR-. ROY THEN
MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS: STOLE, TO APPROVE V-6-78 BECAUSE HE FOUND IT
MET'THE VARIANCE CRITERIA'BECAUSE HE DID NOT FIND UNUSUAL.•HAZARDS; AND
HE� DID NOT BELIEVE IT'W06LD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORH00D. ``MR
ROY':ADDED`THAT THE APPROVAL'WOULD BE SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING"REQUIREMENTS
AS`SPECIFIED IN S-60-77. MOTION CARRIED, WITH MR.•`VISSER VOTING.'N0.
A short recess was announced.
THOMAS HARVILLE - Variance of 9.5' from required sideyard setback at
17905 Talbot Rd. (RS-20)
Mrs. Block said a carport had been located where the applicant now.
wished to build a garage, but it had been removed lz years ago by a
previous owner. She said the garage would b 8' from the property
line and would need a 9'2' variance. She.showed slides of the property,
a vicinity sketch, and the plot plan. She said it would not amount to
a rezone. The conditions not generally applicable to others in the
area were that the house was sited on the lot 25 years ago, prior to
the development of Talbot Park as an RS-20 zone, and that the other
side of the lot is heavily wooded. Strict enforcement of the Zoning
Code would force him to build in a place less suited for access and would
cause loss of the natural vegetation of the area. Although the appli-
cant did wish to build the garage, the trees and the existing layout
of the property were not the result of his actions and had been in
existence for a long period of time. Mrs. Block said the proposed
location would be the most practical in relation to the trees and also
in relation to the layout of the house and existing driveway. Granting
of the variance would not be detrimental to the adjacent property owners,
in her opinion, and she said the neighbor most directly affected had
submitted a letter indicating no objection. That was Janes Welson of
17839 Talbot Rd. With regard to a minimum variance, Mrs. Block said
the proposed garage was very large, 26' x 341. She said a garage 24'
wide would be adequate for two cars and would require a variance of
of 7.5' which she felt was closer to a minimum variance. She recommended
approval of a reduced variance of 7.5', rather than 9:5'. The public
portion of the hearing was opened.
Thomas Harville said Mrs. Block had presented his case very well. He
said he could accept a variance for a 24' wide garage. The public portion
of the hearing was then closed. MRS. DERLETH MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS.
BECCAUSETOITAMETOVE THEVCRITERIATFOR�,A VARIANCE. E AMOUNT OF THE VARIANCE REDUCED TO 7.5'
MOTION CARRIED.
CU-8-78 THE HARBOR GROUP - Conditional Use Permit requesting joint use parking
at 100 2nd Ave. S. (BC)
Mrs. Block said the applicants wished to use some of their present
stalls in their two level structure as well as additional area across
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 4 - February 15, 1978