Loading...
1114 DALEY PL.PDF11111111111111 10707 1114 DALEY PL TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): Lj'6[b ,,Oj ( 1�1 COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: �y�C/LI/NTLO/� /�1 `r-r �y�-,�•� 1'P/!/rIt7F? qX999?zd1,�in,�✓�tn,� Cyg✓1�f�/I/o/�C[ CRITICAL AREAS: IN, `14Z DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required X Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: _ 2�y —'//V PARKING AGREEMENTS DA' EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): `q -I D Li 151 U� t' PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: I1 I I I � I f "j I (� 7 —2 (f O SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: "l —+ SHORT PLAT FILE: P' 4 A LOT:�BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: I 1* v SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: Z`1 I D 15 GEOTECH REPORT DATED: ? ' (t ' ct STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: SAC �1c,Y,�%/!/lllri✓ ,DG/�fl�i'LLC�iI.a'1 I�- C la�t�O�e y� ��;,��,�� � /� *�, LATEMPOSTsTorms\.Street File Checklist.doc District �GQ; 37$%.. -City of.: Edmonds _- Water' Deparament TAP CARD Reading: Date 6'V I,B/a D Meter- No. No.: ' Size 3—Tap Size 3 Mfgrs. No:���, StylegL 1� Purchaser: .: pQ ROUTING :ST.TP n DATE: DIAL A DIG # P.U.D. J TELEPHONE CABLE T.V. 1 GAS FOREMAN VU &uvuU: t � •..• STORM SEWER i ! OTM-REETFILE .. , t FUTURE. SERVICE INSTL: YES NO BORE: CUT: I LOCK CREW DATE: INITIAL: UNLOCK DATE: INITTIAL METER SHOP ACCOUNT NUMBER: a 5 SZ I SUPPLIER: S� i TREATMENT PLANT 1 FOREMAN (% B L T FOREMAN f I INITIAL: DATE: UTILITY TAP CARD METER SHEET APPLICATION/ CATION / BILLING DISPATCH 7%76 �� �,` � i t t,. ..i1,, � - �� v,•.Riy'v�'.++,�•:r,+.^rh4��y^Ki-�ti:,'k�i>a� CITY OF EDMONDS -'�%�7rii,rrta-•µ-..�r ..�w•v++m�,., v ,vSd+.t'9t;,t7?.'S+��.�y f.,{�%''t,;'�i^lw'ti•�i7�'�� "Py�F''"b.,e ;'}y�,'.,y.r-� SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT N2 8244 Address of Construction: Property Legal Description (Include all easerrienfs):" 1�-��A�d EDMONDS r` TREAT MENT PLANT Owner and/or Contractor: .STD uta, �keeivq bAva. ICOUA IA f CJ.4S1/� � � I, —Z� C_ State License No. CDu� �-G%� I If I N M Building Permit No,' ?,0 0 w r 9 Single Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way. 8 No ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units )" RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property:'P�No .❑ Yes El Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement � � 3 01J . PUBLIC WORKS I certif that I .have read and shall comply with all city requirements Date as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. . * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555). BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS.DEPT. Permit Fee: . Issued By �� Trunk Charge: z� Date.lssued- 7 1� 94) Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: /3020 Lid No.: Partial Inspection: Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected:. Date 'Initial Final Inspection Approved: DatemA Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON'JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Bull Copy: Applicant Revised 3!90 00 0 a� •r Of %' CITY of EDMO,S Si@ SEWER PER.,MIT For Inspection Call 771-3202 PERMIT N0. g 6. Address of Construction: /e/ / 441ey / /�e(f Property Legal Description (Include all easements): L<c5+ 3 1-Ia L-vo, IA, i I Owner and/or Builder: sC,►i<= LA v✓� Contractor & License No: Iti/�`�-I- ��� �'i �a� ����• Cv • =►�C. 2Z�-pl -UV� -S ►-CG �!c j� �►JG Singl:e Family.Residence Multi -Family (No. of Units ) EDMONDS TREKfMENT PLANT, Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If.Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement -required, attach legal description and county easement number.) RECEIVE® PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK VIAR'12S1990 6/ PUBLIC WORKS I certify that I have -fead and shall comply Date with the items listed on the back. Permit Fee: Trunk Charge.: Assessment Fee:. Issued By: Date Issued: Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial Rejected: ason ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy - File Green Copy -'Inspector Date Initial Date Initial Buff Copy - Applicant • Side Sewer Drawing $he City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO- -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION [� REPAIRS ❑ LID NO- ------------------ -ASMT. NO. .................. OWNER----------------------------------------•-••-------------------.-----------•----•--------------- CONTRACTOR--•----•---•-•-----------------•----------------•----------------.--.-------------- PERMIT NO. ().—c?4-_G.--- JOB ADDRESS DAL-- , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. •....3 BLOCK NO. . • PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) -------------------•--------------•------•-•--•---•-----------•--••--------------------------•--•------------•------•-•-•------- -------------------------------- NAMEOF ADDITION ----•---•-----------••--•----------------------------•-•----------------------•=-----------------------•-•- EDMONDS I TREATMENT PLANT 1 wl �b 3 De �E 9 o 2' PF--0ss� al \T y Approved: .,o k+ ' D t-f- V - , -b,A L-" -aL . ADATE:-��----•-••---------..- BY-' ........... �vfl, �e,4�� GENERAL NOTES owner Mr. Steven oreem aam Address• 1114DolcyPiaca Edtaoadt WA98020 Phone,• 2 Coulset:. As obave LqA tion• Harbor Mh Lot 03 City ofF.dmmdr . Tu We ' 7749,000,003.0008 Zoo' Lot . FL 1 0063 • Pod Area 2097 Les CW 32% East' Floor 3081 Proposed v0per Floor 195sq. R. new heated Hest TypeGas New Gleo 39.5 . R G oor 30% Dal Load Rao[ • ' 15DL 25 LL Floor 10DL 40 LL " Wind R So b Seismic Zono 3 SoR2ZODO I p 2 Reiaf. S Grade 40 Bar$ Lomher Croda Smasr loodRoot>traenum HFB2 Plyiroad 9 lade: .Root ' --- Elacr g walls- 32/16 NaOing '• Schedule Pertabh:23-11-11-1 Rder to sheet 0 I_---------------- —--255I. =ei ."'i7irt�vo�s 5oltbRU-laI1�EG�LI \ �i 4bo C N to 01 �IMNEWAY / J _ N 2 qo It . p� psi . sc v� / .. • ,� / % � lo: l of i. i V g1•��filJ Tr�pA�� i s rrsAel� / 1 �• cam-- cam_ - rn. , h �\ N o• 47'55 • W �oslulagJTPol.: - inn 23S' 1 ------ — scorn:4-A �� rILLYEff �p RECEIVED,�v 7 4Coq 574 � G. PERMIT COUNTER �►PP OVEll E3Y F�'7LA�VNING THE T FfLE ,•EY' . .,PL-ACE. CA File No: Critical Areas Checklist 0 I� Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/ Location: RECEIVED 2. Property Tax Account Number: -1- oCQ ou?) 0o O Q L T 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or 'Square feet): t PERMIT COUNTER 4. Is this site currently developed? des; no. If yes; how is site developed? _ pi l V, t MA 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. _1.e-*1^ Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over a site. ✓16s��y Rolling: slopes on site generally less''than 15% (a vertical rise/ of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of.66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of.more ihm-.15% and less, than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: A/d : Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Nn ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway Vel floodplain Alo_ of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flow_ s_ across'the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? lows are easpnal? , (What time Qf year? ). 0 r5 A'o J`�a✓ ^CA W5 /AX ,7fovn./ mot '►ti 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: L14 Critical Areas Check] ist.doc/3.19.2001 0 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the' Checklist is to ' enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received:_ iv/zyi Zmi City Receipt #: I $ S 2.o Critical Areas File #: Zvi— blg7- Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to ADDlicant: ► rh--���� A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill -out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The . City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the .specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include. other pertinent -information, (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file thication on the'behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENIc �1 DATE 121 G c41i�t a0V 1. Property Owner's Authorizatibfi By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER t"`¢ DATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY � Owner/Applicant: c%N b-, .. v1�P�d0A� Name / ^/Y Street Address ZAwk,15 V/�- A6 City State Zip Telephone:0?- Email address (optional):: Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City Telephone: Email Address (optional)': Zip Critical Areas Check] ist.doc/3.19.2001 0 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DMSION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Lt. DEB ' f�`i9g0, Mike Hanchett PERM,, couliTER 8516 231st S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Reference: Harbor Hills, Lot 3 Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Hanchett: As discussed in our previous letter dated October 5, 1989, this letter provides details 'for the French drain and reinforced earth fill for the above referenced property. French Drain We recommend that the French drain extend the length of the pro- perty at the toe of the slope on the east side of the site. The drainage trench should be kept away from the slope at least ten (10) feet if possible. The drain should consist of a six (6) inch diameter, rigid perforated pipe bedded and backfilled in pea gra- vel. The trench should be at least three (3) feet deep. A sketch showing the proposed drain location with a drain detail is enclosed with this letter. It appears that the drain may be located under the paved portion of the driveway. The pavement section should include crushed surfac- ing that is independent of the drain rock. A minimum of twenty- four (24) inches of cover should be maintained over the French drain. The perforated drainline should be directed to a tightline which outlets within the existing stream channel on the north side of the property. The tightline should consist of a rigid pipe. Apparently it will be located beneath the driveway. The outlet of • • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett Page 2 the pipe on the north side of the drive should be suitably pro- tected from erosion with rock. Reinforced Earthfill It apears that fill will be necessary for the driveway. The area to be filled is underlain by from two (2) to four (4) feet of peat. The open stream channel will cross the driveway in this area in a ductile pipe. There is a firm base of quarry spalls adjacent to the cul-de-sac, as shown on the site plan. It appears that steep sides will be required on the fill due to the limitation of the easement. To provide a suitable fill for the driveway, we recommend constructing a Reinforced Earthfill. We recommend that the organic soils be removed and a filter fabric be placed on a firm unyielding base. Fill should be placed on the geotextile fabric on, the center and worked outward to force additional muck out from beneath the fabric. The initial lift should be two (2) feet thick, all others one (1) foot thick. Two (2) feet of fill should be placed in between layers of geotextile fabric. In addition, the first lift on geotextile fabric should be shouldered to the required two (2) foot thickness at the edge. The fabric flaps folded over as shown in the enclosed detail and the second lift placed. All lifts should be compacted to 90% of the ASTM D-1557 density. It maybe necessary to temporarily remove the ductile pipe while " placing the fill. Th pipe may be placed within the reinforced earth fill with compacted fill below the pipe elevation to maintain the existing stream elevation. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett Page 3 We recommend the fill should be selected to meet the following specifications: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #200 5.0 maximum. Based on the fraction pass- ing the #4 sieve. The geotextile fabric should conform to the following specifica- tions. Geotextile Fabric Properties (and 'Test Method) Min. Requirements Grab strength minimum (lbs) (ASTM D-1682, Method.16) Puncture strength (lbs) (ASTM D-751, modified) Burst Strength (p.s.i.) (ASTM D-3786, Mullen burst) Trap Tear (lbs) (ASTMD-1117) 0 130 40 210 40 In addition, upon completion of the fill any exposed geotechnical fabric should be covered or coated to protect against sunlight. Paving of the fill area should be performed only after completion of all other construction to allow settlement of the fill prior to., paving., to reduce possible damage of the pavement. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL ■ October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett Page 4 General We should be retained to monitor field work for both the French drain and reinforced earth fill. We expect the on -site conditions to reflect our findings; however, variations may occur. Should soil conditions be encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we should be con- tacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate recom- mendations are required. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mike Hanchett for specific application to lot 3 of the Harbor Hills development in accordance with generally accepted soils and founda- tion engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied,' is made. Thank you for this opportunity to work with you '.on this project. Should you have any questions,`'.feel free to contact us at. any time. Sincerely, .W' `GIE E. j e%it CASCAD GEOTECHNI �' °Y;;js�:'i;`:- Ge rge E. amb, H; Pe Jewett Principal Enginee oc/((�L';tcrstta��`�� ineering Geologist \t PJ:lal SNALE�� ��zOwa_ m® cc: Lovell-Sauerland; Attn: Bob Jones Karen Wiesman Architects Enclosures Job No., SCALE : NOT TO SCALE 8910-8G LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE Date ID,".- By Eng - Gool 10/27/89 HLA Harbor Hills - Lot 3 FRENCH DRAIN DETAIL PAVEMENT SECTI WHERE LOCATED ••••'•�a•°:•°•.•.•.: •o':°:°:.° • •.•••.•'•.• UNDER PAVEMENT GRAVEL BASE .. - • • . • ° . ° . ° a ° • . ° • . . AS REQUIRED •... ° °. • •°•°►•e..°•'••_.• •' .�Lt'= ��CtOr PEA GRAI 6" 0 RIGID PERFORATED I f 18" MIN- CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 KIRKLAND' (206) 821-5080 . SEATTLE: (206) 525-6700 8910-8G I SCALE: NOT TO SCALE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ale Own. BY Eng,�,6�0 10/27/89 HLA i J QUARRY SPALLS DALEY PLACE (CUL DE SAC) Harbor- Allis Lot I - s Location Map..: o _�2ss Ni- psEO% 1_. 255 � .....i 250 _ 245 Lu i 40 i -235 ter- STEEL CULVERT FROM DRIVEWAY PLAN BY LOVELL-SAUERLAND S ASSOCIATES, INC. O F5 I inch equal., 40 feet LIRIRI]PI ioUPorcel .111p .4pprosininte 2-10ot Contour.., PlonninelWi-ision (NO 121 .3rh A e A' Edmonds 11:4 98020 1_115 7 ,-1.0 2_20 Map Request Lisa Barhoun 1114 Da ley Place t. A-2001-014'2 \"icinit%-/L.ID.kR Map 06/01 /2006 ;= cotope A,Y)ok -Iyee,�, ma I _ �3•�. ,'y/ • �r AMENDMENT OF COVENANT AND NOTICE WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds pursuant to Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code has previously required the owner of certain real property described herein to file a covenant and notice with respect to the construction of a building on the subject property due to its susceptibility to earth subsidence and land slide hazard; WHEREAS, such original notice included a requirement for continuous insurance as a condition of development of the lot; and WHEREAS, said requirement of insurance has been waived by the Community Services Director pursuant to. the provisions of ECDC 19.05.050; NOW, THEREFORE, this amendment of a covenant and notification provision has been authorized by the City of Edmonds pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.05. Certain real property described in Exhibit A and the subject of building permit application number F00 is and has been released from a requirement of continuous revision of public liability insurance pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.05.050. DONE this day of �� 1992. CITY OF ED NDS: By: Peter Hahn, Director Community Services -1- WSSI5570.IACR/0006.030.034 A • C� STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this i (04 day of 1992, before me personally appeared Peter Hahn, to me known to be the individual described in and.who executed the foregoing Amendment of Covenant and Notice and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned., IN WITNESS WHEREOF., I have hereto set my hand and affixed by official seal the day and year first above written. WSS15570.1AGR/000 A40.034 -2- 24 �TAt. 11 "� RY PUBLIC in and fthe, State of Washington, residing at Gv 0- My Commission expires: �- 19.05.070 'e Code: One half of the cost of such review or reviews shall be c� paid by the applicant as a plan check fee in the manner provided �. by the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 15 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, provided, however, that this plan check fee shall be in addition to the fee established by ECDC 1� 15.00.020,(C)(1). [Ord. 2728, 19891 19.05.070 ISSUANCE OF PERMITS. The following requirements must be satisfied before a permit will be issued: A. An approved geotechnical report has been submitted; B. Plans and specifications.are submitted incorporating the recommendations of the geotechnical report;. C. The required declarations, disclosures, and covenants and waivers have been submitted; D. Required bonds, insurance or other financial arrangements required have been secured; and E. When review.has been required, all submittals have been determined to have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice. 19.05.080 CONDITIONS-; DENIAL. As a part of the approval process, the Building Official may impose conditions that address site work problems; such measures could include but are not limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the dryer season between May and the end of September, or sequencing activities such as the installation of drainage systems well in advance of construction. A permit will be denied if it is determined by the Director that the development will increase the potential of soil movement, result in an unacceptable risk of damage to adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage to the proposed development. An unreasonable risk of damage.to the proposed development of a single family structure shall be presumed if a risk of substantial loss with a probability of greater than:30% in a 25 year -period exists. Denials shall.be in writing and shall state in detail the basis for denial. 19.05.090 CONSTRUCTION OR USE OF ACCESS ROADS. The applicant or contractor must secure the Building Official's approval before going on to a site with excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to grade for any purpose including the creation of access to the site. 197-10 (09/30/89) AMENDMENT OF COVENANT.AND NOTICE WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds pursuant to Chapter 19A5 of the Edmonds Community 'Development Code has previously required the owner of certain real property described herein to file a covenant and notice with respect. to the construction of -a building on the subject property due to its,susceptibility to earth subsidence and land slide hazard; WHEREAS, such original notice included a requirement for continuous insurance as.a condition of development of the lot; and WHEREAS, said requirement of insurance has been waived by the Community Services Director pursuant to the provisions of ECDC 19.05.050; NOW, THEREFORE, this amendment of a covenant and notification provision has been authorized by the City of Edmonds pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.05. Certain real property described in Exhibit A and the subject of building permit .application number is and has been released from a requirement of continuous revision .of public liability insurance pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.05.050. DONE. this day of ;//Fa�.��. 1992. CITY OF ED NDS: By: Peter Hahn, Director Community Services -1- WSS15570.1ACR/0006.040.034 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) '^ On this IV, day of MOAJC� 1992, before me personally appeared Peter. Hahn, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed.the foregoing Amendment of Covenant and Notice and acknowledged that he signed the same.as his -free and voluntary act and ..deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,'I have hereto set my hand and affixed by official seal the day and year first above written. P3OTAR`� PUBLIC : in. and f . the State of Washington, esiding at lIJ My Commission expires: tp �- -2- WSS15570.1AGR/0006.040.034 .INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT F E B - G np!j lj CnUNITER { ;: is/. . The undersigned applicant(s) for building permit, subdivision, planned residential development, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, in part due to the review of my/our application by the City of Edmonds, Washington, a noncharter, optional municipal code city, do hereby indemnify, waive, release, and stipulate as follows: 1. I/We do .state` that we have been provided with/have waived receipt of a copy of an earth subsidence and landslide hazard map made available to me -by the City showing. those hazards.previously identified by the.City through its consultant Roger Lowe and Associates, Inc. and a follow-up report by GeoEngineers,,Inc., and state that I/we have reviewed or are fully aware of the, contents and existence of said maps and of reports explaining, said maps. and identifying certain hazards to be anticipated or encountered in the construction or, development upon my property. I/We..am aware that copies' of said report are on file with the City Clerk and available for my review -at my request. In addition, I/we have undertaken an _independent assessment of the hazards through professional consultants of my/our choosing. 2. PROMISE TO INDEMNIFY: I/We do promise to release and -indemnify the 'City, its agents, officers, employees, and/or independent contractors from any and al claims, damage or loss of any kind or nature resulting -from or to any,party or person, or the property thereof as a result of: A. The construction design, soils report, and/or" any other act required as a part of.the building.permit application process, subdivision process or planned residential development process and the subsequent preparation of my land for and construction thereon 19008070 1 VOL. •�� 3t PAGE U 0 6 7 of any's'tructure or building by myself/ourselves, or my/our agents, employees or contractors and/or the construction of any building or structure.. B:- The provisions of false, inaccurate, or misleading information by myself/ourselves, or by my/our.agents, employees or contractors.in the permit., subdivision, or planned residential development process;.and' C. Any risk or hazard of which I have been notified or could reasonably have had notice of by review of the documents on file with the the City of Edmonds or its building division or could have discovered through reasonable professional efforts of my/our'experts. 3. The undersigned applicants hereby waive and.release.the City from any and all claims arising from the situations described in this agreement, but specifically reserve claims against the City, its officers, employees, or independent contractors, from any loss or damage which arises from or.out of the Ci`ty's sole negligence. Nothing herein shall be construed to -be a promise to indemnify the City, .its officers, employees, or independent contractors, from any loss or damage caused by their sole negligence. DATED this day of 19 and given with reference. to building permit application, subdivision application, planned residential development application no. READ CAREFULLY - CONTAINS. WAIVER AND INDEMNITY PROVISIONS Individual By President By Secretary 0®8"1 O �. 2 VOL. `�: +� �SPAGE i��$ INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ss- _ COUNTY OF iEf*6 ) ''g _ On this day personally appeared before me f� 5 r F y� C. GR E E � U ry) to me known to U6,`� . individual described in and who executed the within and foregoinv - instrument, and acknowledged that -14— si.gned the same as his free and voluntarx act and deed -for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. my hand and official seal this 3071ti day of .4. W1, NOTARY PUBLI in and for the State of Washington residing at ORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF.WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 19 , before me,. the undersigned, a Notary'Public in and for the State of Washington; -duly commissioned and sworn, -personally appeared and to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,'and acknowledged the .said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and.purposes therein mentioned, and'on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the official seal.of said corporation. WITNESS my hand.and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing .at . 0 8.07 0 17 4 V 0 L . 2 60 PAGE6S 0VD oD FEB SEQ r�n1 COVENANT TO NOTIFY The undersigned property owner(s), as applicant -for >� 4 S/�9lel �/11//7A2SI4��vlll a building permit/grad:ing permit, ® in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, in part due. to ® the review of my application, do hereby stipulate and promise to the ® City of Edmonds, Washington, a noncharter optional municipal code city, ® as follows: 1. SUBJECT TRACT: The undersigned is/are the owner(s) of certain real estate located in.the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, and further described as follows: Lnt- 3 1'/ S, GAS ee12 !��" � .'Recon%� 1N Volume- 6o%a 6tv P—AlieIGS —I� , /N Cws/v-/ �QeCuR�S e 4,v 2. STATEMENT OF HAZARD: The above described subject tract or some portion thereof .lies within an area"of potential earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been assessed and determined by professionals. in the.employ of the undersigned property owner(s) through written reports required by, and on file with, the City of Edmonds, Building Division, in application file number g006 0 54 All prospective inhabitants, buyers, lenders, or other persons acquiring any.interest in the'subject tract are hereby notified of such -potential hazards and. of the information on file with the City, incorporated by this reference as 90 0.807011 t� i • AGE I� G VOL. 2 1 P� � fully as if herein set forth. In addition to an assessment of any such hazard, said City .files may- contain conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City in the course of permit issuance and may reference any. features in the design which will require ongoing maintenance or future modification to address anticipated soil changes or movement. All such prospective inhabitants, buyers, lenders or other interested parties are encouraged to review said files and shall be charged with notice of*the contents thereof. 3. PROMISE TO NOTIFY: The owners, on behalf of themselves, their heirs, agents, successors in interest and/or assigns do hereby promise to inform any successors and assigns that said described property lies within a potential earth subsidence and landslide hazard, of any risk identified by reports of the professionals and associated with the development of that property, and of any conditions, prohibitions, restrictions, or ongoing maintenance responsibilities which exist with respect to development of that site. 4. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:. These statements are made in and with regard to an application for 511v4lt /e.sloleiya issued' this % day of AU6US1 , - 19 `1'0, under City of Edmonds file No. gGL�J►�O 5. WAIVER: I/We/the corporation as the owner of the described tract, and on behalf of my/our/ heirs, successors and assigns do hereby waive the right to assert any loss or claim against the City. of Edmonds, its agents, employees,. or independent contractors, which may arise by reason of or out of the review of our application and/or issuance of 'the above -described permit. for development approval by the City for the subject property, or from the construction of any building AGE�>�%�� or structure or any grading, filling or other action pursuant to said permit, excepting, however, any loss arising from the sole negligence of the City,'its officers, employees, or independent contractors. DATED this day of 19_ (Individual) By . (Individual) (President) By (Secretary) r • �' i • � • � wT" ww' iYy'A� 1.7 a 9 ®® 8070 Y VOL. 'PAGE (OWCi INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SNGHc�MIS71 ) ss. COUNTY OF -KING ) On this day personally appeared before me �TEVG_ N E G2EEjy6 13H U m , to me known to be. the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing -instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as -his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under -my hand and official seal this ,�o Tyday of. S�NVA•rz� , 19�p .. �-! y� o�� NOTARY PUBLIC i and for the State of Washington, residing at o NOTARy .Ni i PUB L%C jam% CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S lit ON ) t\•• ) s s . k"'COUNTY OF KING On this' day of 19 before me., the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for -the State of Washington,.duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and ,. to me known to.be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said. .instrument -to be the free -and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the'uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that.. the seal affixed is the official seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at 9®0807 1.' 4 vo�.23��Pa�E���h 890_19 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering February 4, 1992 Mr. Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, Washington 98020 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The City is in receipt of your letter dated February 3, 1992. I hope the following information will be helpful to you. Item #1: Under Chapter 19.05.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code which adopts Ordinance 12661; the Building Official or the Director may require that the homeowner carry a policy of general public liability in a determined amount for a time period not to exceed ten (10) years. Chapter 19.05.030 further allows applicants to request waivers from these requirements. I Standard operating procedures for the Plat of Harbor Hills has been to require the insurance. In the case of Lot 2, Mr. Horton requested a waiver and it was granted. If you wish to make a written request for 'a waiver from the insurance requirement you may do so to the Building Official. Item #2 and #3: Since this issue is currently under review by the CityyIs claim adjuster we ask that you make all requests directly to Mr. Bob Kerslake Jr., Washington -Oregon Claim Service, at Post Office Box 25549 Seattle, WA 98125. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Inspector • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 0 BUILDING Steven E. Greenebaum Mr. Richard R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Mr. Mumma: FEB 0 4 1992 Writer / Musician 3 February 1992 A few items have come to my attention and I would very much appreciate any light you may be able to shed upon them. 1) I am informed that the million dollar liability insurance that I have been required to carry is not being required of the house built on lot #2. Has the city changed its mind regarding the need for this extra insurance? If so, I would appreciate notification in writing. If not, I would appreciate a better understanding of the reasoning behind a city requirement for me to carry the insurance. 2) I am also informed that the city believes a separate grading review fee, as opposed to a grading permit fee, has not been paid by me and is still owed. I would appreciate more information regarding this fee. Specifically: what was the_fee for, when did this review take place and by whom was the review made? I would also appreciate some examples of single family builders who have paid this separate fee: including names, addresses and dates. Lastly, in your letter of 2 May, 1991, you refer to Landau Associates notification of you of their "bookkeeping error." Once again, I would greatly appreciate a full copy of that letter and any accompanying documents. Thank you. Sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: l Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation Engineering 8g0_lg January 20, 1992 Washington -Oregon Claim Service Bob Kerslake, Jr. Post Office Box 25549 Seattle, Washington 98125 RE: Greenebaum Your File No. 1-9256 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR In response to your inquiry, I hope the following information will be helpful to you. (Please refer to the attached letters) ---Greenebaum letter dated 4/23/91 City owes him $ 75.90 ---Greenebaum letter dated 5/14/91 City owes him $121.42 ---Greenebaum letter dated 6/18/91 City owes him $ 47.38 ---Greenebaum letter dated 10/23/91 City owes him $269.44 It appears that Mr. Greenebaum can't seem to make up his mind as to what the City "owes" him; our office has provided him all requested documentation to prove that the remaining fees of $47.38 are due to the City. The City, in an attempt to resolve this issue, sent a letter from the City Building Official on 5/2/91 informing Mr. Greenebaum that the City was willing to call it even, he refused this resolution. .. Therefore, in defense of the City, I submit the following: Number One: Regarding one-half plan review fees. Mr. Greenebaum chose to build his home on a plat that has some very strict ordinances regarding design and permit review. One ordinance, #2778 (attached), requires that applicants pay one-half of all professional review costs incurred by the City for outside plan review. In this way the burden of review costs are not placed onto the general public, fees are split between the developer and the City. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Page Two Mr. Kerslake January )<5, 1992 IZO Number Two: Regarding his original claim of $151,80. City Ordinance #2661, requires professional inspections by licensed engineers during the construction process. These costs are the sole responsibility of the applicant. Mr. Greenebaum's claim stems from the failure of his engineer to submit the required field reports to the City. In an attempt to continue the project without a stop workage, the City Building Official contacted Mr. Greenebaum's engineer and directed him to conduct a field inspection. Mr. Greenebaum was not notified of this request in advance and therefore believes the City should pay for one-half of this inspection charge. However, since this inspection was required by Ordinance #2661, it is not an issue as to who contacted Greenebaum's engineer to make the field inspection. It was a required inspection and the costs of the engineer's time is soley the responsibility of Mr. Greenebaum. Number Three: Regarding the grading/fill fee. As indicated on the face of the building permit that Mr. Greenebaum provided this is a grading PERMIT fee, NOT a grading REVIEW fee, it is not a double charge. All permit fees are to be paid by the applicant. Number Four: WJA and Whitcutt Fees Professional structural review of Mr. Greenebaum's plans was conducted by WJA Associates, review fee of $279.29. Mr. Whitcutt provided professional review of State energy code requirements, review fee of $49.00. Both charges are called out on the 5/23/91 memo by myself to Dick Mumma, I believe you have a copy. Again, as required by Ordinance #2728 the applicant is responsible to pay one-half of all professional review fees incurred by the City. If I can be of further service please don't hesitate to contact' me at 771-0220. Thank you, eeanniMne L. Gr f Building Inspector IN * WASHINGTON - OREGON CLAIM ERVICE January 9, 1992 "Claim Administration and Adjustment" Jeannie Graff Building Department City of Edmonds 505 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Our Client: City of Edmonds Claimant: Steven E. Greenbaum Date of Loss: 5/23/91 Our File: 1-9256 Dear Jeannie: '"1040 BAN 13 1992 I am still trying to sort this claim out. Attached is some additional correspondence from Mr. Greenebaum. He believes the City has not but should equally share in the August 23, 1990 site visit by Cascade Geotechnical. He also states the $22.50 grading plan review fee you included in your figures was also included as a $23.00 charge in the grading/fill column of the application, and should not have been included in your figures. In his original notice of claim he also claims 1151.80 site visit requested by City but paid for by owner after plan check reviews were completed on a day no work was taking place." Do you know what he is talking about here? Do you know what he is talking about at the bottom of his January 8 letter when he talks about additional site charges from WJA and Whitcutt? Please give me a call at 367-5580 or write tome at our Seattle address. Thank you for your help! Sincerely, Bob Kerslake, Jr. Seattle Branch BKJ/jk Enc. FAX (206)363.2332 Bond (503) 484-0441 P.O. BOX 25549 P.O. Box 9490 P.O. Box 9811 8895 S.W. Canyon Rd. 0116 P.O. Box 1087 P.O. Box 7187 130 East Main St aB36 P.O. Box 1437 Seattle, WA 98125 Spokane, WA 99209-9490 Yakima. WA 98909 Portland. OR 97225 Pendleton, OR 97801 Eugene, OR 97401 Medford. OR 97501 Klamath Fags, OR 97601 24 hr. (206) 367.5%2 24 hr. (509) 328-1851 24 hr. (509) 966.5926 24 hr. (503) 297.7905 24 hr. (503) 276-3221 24 hr. (503) 484-0441 24 hr. (503) 779.8521 24 hr. (503) 882.6290 • Steven E. Greenebaum Writer / Musician PE C eV>~::.{r 16 5i - q 8 January 1992 Bob Kerslake, Jr. Washington -Oregon Claim Service P.O. Box 25549 Seattle, WA 98125 Re: Your letter of 23 December 1991 Your File: 1-9256 Dear Sir: Enclosed are the requested cancelled check (actually a fax copy as with the holidays Continental was having trouble getting a photocopy to me in a timely fashion) and photocopy of Cascade's bill, documenting the expense in question (it is circled in red). As the check was not for the full amount and so there may be no misunderstanding, please find also enclosed my letter to Cascade regarding what my check covered. You also requested documents showing that the grading plan fee was paid separately. Enclosed, therefore, are copies of the City of Edmonds bill which included the fee (again, circled in red) and receipt from the City for payment. As I was prepared for court before learning that this process must first be attempted, AU items on the list submitted to you have documentation readily available. If you have any further questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum P.S. I do look forward to your explanation of: a) Site Charge $279.29 WJA and b) Site Charge $ 49.00 Whitcutt. 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper 0 0) cascade Geotechnical 12911 N.E. 126th Place Kirkland, WA 98034 206-821-5080 Project 8910-08G Harbor Hills Lot 3 Invoice number 2463 Daley Place; Edmonds August 31, 1990 Page number 1 Steven Greenebaum 19508 80th Avenue West #B Edmonds, WA 98020 4869 TERMS: NET 30 DAYS Professional Services Hours Rate Amount PRINCIPAL ENGINEER ENGINEERING 8-02-90 .50 85.00 42.50 PROJECT ENG. GEOLOGIST ENGINEERING 8-02-90 4.00 50.00 =200.00 SITE VISIT 8-01-90 4.00 50.00 200.00 8-16-90 2.00 50.00 100.00 GEOLOGIST SITE VISIT 8-08-90 2.00 45.00 90.00 8-20-90 2.50 45.00 11 0 8-23-90 3.00 45.00 135.00 CONFIRM BEARING 8-29-90 2.50 45.00 112.50 REVIEW DATA 8-01-90 4.00 45.00 180.00 8-20-90 1.00 45.00 45.00 8-21-90 1.00 45.00 45.00 ONSITE INSPECTION 8-02-90 8.00 45.00 360.00 8-03-90 8.00 45.00 360.00 8-06-90 8.00 45.00 360.00 8-13-90 8.00 45.00 360.00 8-14-90 8.00 45.00 360.00 PICKUP/DELIVER MATERIALS 8-06-90 .50 45.00 22.50 8-14-90 .50 45.00 22.50 8-20-90 .50 45.00 22.50 GEOLOGIST OVERTIME ONSITE INSPECTION 8-06-90 .50 55.00 27.50 8-13190 .50 55.00 27.50 Services Total 69.00 $3185.00 SE xoop- 0 - . I � ��`CE4a1T" Project 8910-08G Harbor Hills Lot 3 Daley Place; Edmonds ----------------------------------- Professional Services Expenses TRAVEL MILEAGE $0.35 per mile 8-01-90 8-01-90 8-02-90 8-02-90 8-03-90 8-08-90 8-13-90 8-14-90 8-16-90 8-20-90 8-20-90 8-23-90 8-29-90 Invoice number 2463 August 31, 1990 Page number 1 ----------------------- Hours Rate Amount Amount Expenses Total Invoice Total Approved by: GEORGE LAMB Cascade Geotechnical 1i�. 50 80 16.80 19.95 16.80 18.20 19.60 10.50 16.80 1 40 80 191.45 3376.45 -aio,so 3[ys �9S •'�•' .,/,,,. L. .•A� "It}1( a 'r_ .p -y,.p>sM':.r r; o., tiT ,, •r,� .Y. yr..,, TY, 1 r„•.• .ii--.. I :^.i:�r .. '�y i.�.e'ha,. ,�' -:�.:> :�-J%�..� >�h��y+:' �I�lyf ;'!••�:;,.:,'•. :3j w!1':.- • �Y,I•yv„ 1 5�•'.Y.,��ci=:�nt'.i':5;.". r,. ,L' •�•r 7.^•+r�, r �e �•�•; ��r �•• + � � Nr, 'Y� S'I I �• S•�, •::�: r 11 •� :S;' f ;•d : '/ n ., \• � ; , .�; � . ,� ! '. tr{{l. R, 4..r !'<:.,:, �!�. �' v,'i ; h "� /',ti „"i y i' .. .I +{a r i t ti � ;'•l.i'Y•; ;� �;,e „t` __ t r�,. ,yr ` 7! ti.. A r'. I+„r. \'� L •'„1'� : � !F rpn jL �' ..� ;'!•: •t1: ': •: �•� .�'§i - h I /:•hl�l i'��f]I � i f-',,r�:. ! �q Y'1! ' 1 '1•s Vl' .Z• Jq �' V i�l'._ '' �.G., �� f } - r 11'M � r y� R a�; •S+�'}f•.' tFt �� : �.� 5• yl, ^ � ,.,� r;. .i:1 .t� 5.. �iNr 1t '��{. t 1 -1• �lr��ti ' ii!, i�:1'. •'�tt �'{,, n:l,!_ �: :N:a•. t� .a, ..S�,J1•,: �•. ��•kttf f'.i� t.�yryK:y �i('i S• ',�, �•':i`r ''',r5r.1f •�•5.,�'•� Ili "' 'li �el ♦fh �,t/f .Tt! a. l 7 o., „1 I i•.1 .:.� .�t'i�lllif�l:.t;�.t 1 �!n! y va. d•. 1A3"��'� •$�Jij•,�lyi�1,�•+.��E. j i. M1',� ?• J C ' : r :lrp yi�'-��ti•y{ J✓�.:`�".i �J',;Jf ,,fir.!','. et ,.Zlf Gt"'i�, ii ���•�.`�r*:M1' N�•,1��:; 'v ��N �y ifs t� :�.'�• tlt, l', :,;�5•r•!'»�a�.... .. ve. rd-in . + y- .,F. •tir'4 }I�,. e,ri :',. ,.. J: :4':. '•: ;'.. y war Alit'; ills i � •7 • .i ho IF cq ..1 .11�ir• .. J • •+ f :i i,' r '.;!!•:::fir:.: '9,1 ,! .. �..s-� : , •f, : i'1 ;i.. ,�, 5, , +-�r,r 5•+�•�+. 1 �rl�i/1:..•.;._.Y,;x.:jy'tii;Y"r;fR; ...� ��+�'��., •i:.,••.''i ,'cf;" :;,., .�� '1�1^l p+.'`+' "r�"�•:d°•Is`••: n'•f::'.: Tr�•�'S6; ' .:. ��,ii„ ,'•ir '•�:� •"irl" ' fir•:+;. t:'�J?)II, '„ ' '{ItxJ,i�,'e�hr'1:':v •-'�.��'.'..'::n•_' :,,i+r:'•. ::�,�,5� �: :;1: �. , i l : "�:i : r •-`.'_'1. Vwr i�i /, ;� +.•�J.r�;°�4� t:� • ,.�.r r t .il •.,,�: � .. Y. ... ri •, a .. 1, :.�: .,r,.!1:..'�'x:' •. a`:, ' r? '•r ;' ��' '•:' '�'i';'•f ��.'�`'ti�h r'l,q rt •.;is r� ti••• ''S.r ::1 ::::•. a i'.1i ;, .,a,.. J �i•, . ". : )'�.; .l cY, I a,'.'• r'rr '•�i. •.?. ,54.: .�t:•�.il,.1� �'i-,' o-�f �,ryt .•A,A,�'•� ;,jla.'::•' ^.�11,:,w ,•, as•`�, _ ,ir,� ..l <.;. ��ll, f�'t•` .r:� '���,'e�'�'!:•Y..• '��.`:'vqr: '�'::•. :,. 'j J'tl''l,�'%' n..7'.N�,.�7. ,I. JN'3'!I _��t %� • r.i,;�"� �r �J'! , Pt `�.w:r,l1�' .., '� /�.: ^ail 1 _ - i•,- kq' oiyr �V'd.L:t�srnr li�oJ;•,:�:t9.���•�;il• '+�<�, �. ,�5.1;i.y�iti:�;r. r'ti. :. • ':' "cg `t�!i•sa •1l,�lt'i�t �',�i V. -v'�� �l,I.��.;A!�,_,,.7�1'i�lp;+,. • r; 'l.7 tal,�yl�,1i1' j� :r;t ••I r �:�'' I'v �1r• ,,tJ,.3j,R:- _ . l�';�• ., � 'i�='"`• i :`�:.'�.�'?°r'�^�-t`�'(�+r} 1;��, lLjF65�"i f , t,�t; l! ��. St,1�; � �;_ _ •.: • '� • :1�j .. :.J- ,'S, F I l��,y :QE1n: r '� •.�:dv. �jS��i`i.r.'.: •` �•�,�•'•:'�;•�r.p .� ;,�� .•".q 461, avvi .c',�`,` .4 ��ft I+t 1+ ��J)r�Y')�'.t( `l _L} ?':y:.��•'/+.••;'• •••v;i... !'4 ��I�,'+'.� tf ,'�l�tt �yL'�y y7�r�.,t� [� 0+a �;a. 1l7 I.. ;•t.,' !+;-+.;1_�:•�•� �'S. ,�i I �_• r��'+�,}l�il ��'}S'l• h1S• r'11--:�.� ,1jI l., f ` :1�.,..: � ,.�., t.,. Lj •.1+'.!!I t Ifi' ,• � - r,R7,';ri; I , '' i.l � ,�.i''/� .,f,�l' l..Lt�`�4r,^ : �.. .. ..A :[i::i • !. �,�� :q r�yf •y � In r:.`h.• ��. i',.11 ,I 7�.''r•� WZ.:: nt :r 'c!� • :�+•• .j, ` 1 .A'IYr' ��.'�' :�-:��, ��' ' f � 4 { . r7 • 'L. t�'i��ri • . I`�I T• "),IN j ; ,. R `•'jai!!). .?�1�7 .rP/'t:t: r.r: �' ,`i'4,,,!11�.�jj+� psi.,•... f,�,4..t.,",'.s` 3:�:1t 1• r tlb I a. ,•F I'.i"{'�' �`.. ;~./-��I,�"4�'fi:IL [ ` �i r. J'. .�r•�• ,1.;.: :da �tJ`��j.�},F'7„7r gip{; .,�:��+�p �; .�-{�•+�;� , %j tY'.•u�il•.j' J�_•,. � �-�fj,'� f`•TIY �' { j I � J' � �rp�a,i I i t •' ,.1 it �r�1� h11r� iti�y .�r: r - I�t .{�.. L.1 :�•" .i. T�*IL�tt� r J. , ��, �.r. ..t".. ... -�!t1�St�rt .:7.�.-r�l ",�d...��, it • tl�^- ;b;i; Yi �!h'rl.:+i�.f•'[ .t 1. i': .f •��': .., It � -. ..:ir_>,.' •. _••i ,¢,.�;:�•''�. y:• i�' '.•''~.• r 7 .. ��•. jet>l.i � ... �! L71 Pat Gray, Accounts Manager Cascade Geotechnical 12919 N.E. 126th Place Kirkland, WA 98034 Dear Pat, 01 20 October 1990 I am in receipt of your letter of 17 October. Unfortunately, it sheds no light on the two concerns I had raised. 1) How can Amjad's mileage for 1 August be correct? He was not requested (on that day) and had.no reason to be on site. Peter was the person who was sent by Cascade to the site on that day, not Amjad, so why I'm being charged for Amjad's mileage? Perhaps there's a good reason. But simply to proclaim that, "Amjad's mileage is correct," and then state, "We trust that this provides sufficient information," is not helpful. 2) You state that, "The engineering on August 2 was for in office design and analysis." Of jd=? There was already a charge for "Review of Data" on 1 August, so this must have been something new. What? Again, if there is a logical explanation I would be happy to hear it. But you make none. And as neither I nor the builder who was on constantly on site can imagine what this engineering could entail, asking for an explanation is not, I think, unreasonable. You close your letter by stating, "We look forward to receiving full payment by October 31, 1990." I would have gladly paid an accurate bill in full 1.n September. But the first bill you sent me was, for reasons that can only be known to Cascade, remarkably inaccurate. I had two questions concerning the revised bill and immediately posted to you a letter asking for a clarification of it. That was nearly four weeks ago. I had refrained from paying the undisputed balance in the belief that the clarifications I had requested would be quickly forth- coming. As'that hasn't happened you will find enclosed a check for $3165.95, which is your invoice total minus $210.50. Sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 19508 - 80th Ave W Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98026 . N2 . 12817 City of Edmonds Community Services I Date: g1% hol— Received of:v Check Water Met Water Cor Street Cut Sewer connec Canino- I cr.oPt Restoration Ruiltlinn Permit: Permit # Date of Hearing: By: Time: - EDMONDS 'CONSWYMOF N PERMIT APPLICATION USE ,.'I'ERM1T' 1 ZONE NUMBER' RO——900607 JOB 11IT11TI ADDRESS f_ y ,pl OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS elf \' �.; L Al ESCRIP ION C EC SUBDIVISION for 3 NO. LID P-IL-b4 NO. 9 O MAILINGADDRESS f� TESCP PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. APPROVED EXISTING D - REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED BY O 2 CITY ZIPTELEPHONENUMBER C ` �' NAME RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED O W STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED 0 z O w x ADDRESS 2% / �/` SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEW BY W < CITY 21P T LEPHONE NUMBER k "AlCr 14 REMARKS NAME ZA S' N I T m , ¢ ADDPE SFINAL. METER SIZE I� 3 BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE N FIXTURE UNITS S`¢ 2 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER =O '7 , REMARKS ; • O STATE LICENSE NUMBER SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. O ' '.i ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT _ Y S SHOREUNEI o Legal Description of Property - Include all easements (Show below or attach two Copies) V a a N r G olf�IKf-� X /CG 7.3 VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE ° !; •. SETBACKS — FEET / FRONT �`' 'SIDE REAR HEIGHT it LOT COVERAGE( Z 2 7 r w Tax Account Parcel No. y r _ REMARK o1im&Y3 ®M/11t )!W SL N1 fum9q! EW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING 7/r-ry QS 1� ; L. :DDIALTEROCOMMERCIAL MECHANICAL OREPAIR APT. BLDG. SIGN EXCAVATE, FILL FENCE DEMOLISH Don GRADE ElI_—x_FT) IPL� F,d rcH pt�w eor.41hwsr,at XeMWd fK/at- I CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION •L I CODE HEIGHT - CARPORT �•✓'F SWIM REMODEL GARAGE' SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA REQUIRED YES L: NO OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD WOOD STOVEI RETAINING WALL] ... EAT ROCKERY RENEWAL EMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 0 (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: f° I7* 6 a m _ - NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF o m -.WELLING UNITS / S ad NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE S !J BUILDING `'y100aim, PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL GRADINGIFILL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curls, sldewPlks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE $Q • Permit Application: 180 Days Perrpit Limit: 1 Year •Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days �1M�`(J►'f �d WifMIN /W RISK ,o�-i�ir It - y w s a x ° ° "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors In Interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold4WOM harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance not limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision..' PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT —300 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that 1 am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz• ed thereby, no person will be'employed In violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• lion Insurance. ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL THIS PERMIT This application Is not a permit until AUTHORIZES ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his WORK NOTED Deputy; and lees are paid, and receipt is INsvecTloN acknowledged In space provided. DEPARTMENT ! CITY OF OFFICIAL'S N DATE % / Z1 EDMONDS 1' j SIG NA U (OWNER OR AG NTI DATE SIGNED /J f.� 1// `-�. L l/ ' CALL FOR LEAS DATE p INSPECTION V/IT ATTENTION IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A OR UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE BUILDINGANDAPPROVALURE OR 771-3202 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor ------------------------ WASHINGTON - OREGON CLAIM SERVICE ASSOCIATION "Claim Administration and Adjustment" December 23, 1991 Mr. Richard R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds 505 Bell St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Our Client: City of Edmonds Claimant: Steven Greenebaum Date of Loss: 5/23/91 Our File: 1-9256 Dear Richard: I have been asked to respond to the- claim of Steven Greenebaum for the City of Edmonds. There are a few points I need to clear up before responding to the claim. In your May 23 letter you indicate "the remaining charge of $71.76 is valid." Does this mean this is something that should be or should not be charged to Steven Greenebaum? If it should be charged, please tell me what the charge was for and why it should be Mr. Greenebaum's responsibility. He states the $22.50 grading plan review fee should not be included in your figures because it was paid separately. What can you tell me about that? Please give me a call at 367-5580 if you have any questions. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Bob Kerslake, Jr. Seattle Branch BKJ/jk cc: City of Edmonds - Art Housler WCIA 1"Ov l �) eA/led Ire. 4W/�/� .-e- ��/.�%.✓ L) 6440� Ae w.4.t FAX 1206) 363.2332 Bend (503) 484-0441 P.O. BOX 25549 P.0- Box 9490 P 0 Box 9811 8895 S W Canyon Rd a 116 P 0 Box 1087 P 0. Box 7187 130 East Main SL Q36 P.O. Box 1437 Seattle, WA 98125 Spokane, WA 99209-9490 Yakima. WA 98909 Portland. OR 97225 Pendleton, OR 97801 Eugene, OR 97401 Medford, OR 97501 Klamath Fags. OR 97601 24 hr. (206) 367-5582 24 hr. (509) 328-1851 24 hr. (509) %6-5926 24 hr. (503) 297-7905 24 hr. (503) 276-3221 24 hr. (503) 484-0441 24 hr. (503) 779-WI 24 hr. (503) 882.6290 Memo To; Art Housler, Finance Director From; Dick Mumma, Building Official Date; December 17, 1991 RE; Greenebaum Claim/Plan Review Fees The purpose of this memo is to clarify the situation on the reference subject. Mr. Greenebaum applied for a building permit for a new single family residence; his lot was located in an Earth Subsidence area and subject to Ordinance #2661 which requires applicants to pay for one-half of all charged consultant fees for professional plan review. During the plan review and site inspections made by the City's professional consultants, the total bill charged to the City was $3,228.82. Mr. Greenebaum paid $1,534.00 on 8/1/90. One half of $3,228.82 is $1,614.41; therefore Mr. Greenebaum owes the City an additional $80.41. Attached is a memo . dated 5 / 2 3 / 91 that was written to me, with a copy provided to Mr. Greenebaum, which breaks down all the billings. My position is that Mr. Greenebaum's arguements are not valid and he owes the City an additional $80.41. a CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation e Engineering 890-19y November 1, 1991 Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: October 23 demand letter. Mr. Greenebaum LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR I am in receipt of your October 23, 1991 letter and have reviewed your request for a refund. I again reviewed the history of your account that was sent you on May 29, 1991. I believe the accounting of your file is complete and accurate and I support my staff's findings. Therefore, I cannot hor}or your new request for a refund of $269.44 yy 1 Richard R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds cc: Scott Snyder, City Attorney grnbum3.rrm • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan BUILDING OCT 25� 1991 Steven E. Greenebaum Writer / Musician 23 October 1991 Mr. Richard R. Mumma _Building-.Off.icial -- — City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Mr. Mumma: As you rejected�my final attempt at compromise'(my letter of 18 June 1991) I see little reason to hope for a positive response to this letter. However, I find myself in the position of needing to put a few things in order. The City of Edmonds, through your office, owes me in overcharges and costs incurred by me that were your responsibility, a total of $269.44. This figure does not include unwarranted hindrances to construction by your office that I am -unable to calculate at this time. As my letter of 18 June and previous letters show, I have made every effort to settle this matter, including a pro- posal that more than split the difference in your favor. In re- turn you have sent me new figures and calculations at every turn, and even attempted to extort additional money from me, all the while refusing even my proffered compromise. The offer of compromise is, therefore, withdrawn and void. The City of Edmonds owes me $117.64 in overcharges and $151.80 in charges by Cascade Geotechnical that were the City's responsi- bility to pay. I require a check for the total, $269.44 within five working days. Sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper 0 9 " CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NALIGHTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR June 25, 1991 Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: June 18, 1991 Demand Letter Mr. Greenebaum: I am in receipt of your June 18, 1991 letter and have reviewed your request for a refund. I, again, reviewed the history of your account that was sent to you on May 29, 1991. I believe the accounting of your file is complete and accurate and I support my staff's findings. Therefore, I cannot honor your request for a refund of $47.38: Sjincerel ; Richard Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890-199- CITY OF EDMONDS OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 447-7000 FAX: 447.2015 spy 2 4199� May 23, 1991 Mr. Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Greenebaum: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Copies of your communications have been forwarded when received to Dick Mumma in the City's Building Department. You need to resolve your dispute with him. Given the relative amounts of money involved, if you cannot work this out with the Building Official, you will be proceeding in small claims court. In that situation, neither you nor the City will be represented by counsel. Therefore, please work this matter out with Mr. Mumma or take whatever action you feel is appropriate. Very truly yours, OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE 5 t( . Scott Sn er WSS/klt 1/ cc: Dick Mumma WSS53341L/0006.040.034 2100 Westlake Center Tower, 1601 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-1686 • Incorporated August 11. 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan ft Steven E. Greenebaum Writer / Musician 14 May 1991 Scott Snyder, City Attorney City of Edmonds Ogden, Murphy and Wallace 2100 Westlake Center Tower 1601 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1686 Dear Mr. Snyder, In my letter to you of 23 April, 1991, I wrote that within five days I required from the city of Edmonds: 1) Final approval of all necessary paperwork as to the com- pletion of the house. 2) A letter from the Building Official to Security Pacific Bank, Edmonds branch (with a copy to me), instructing that insti- tution to release the frozen funds to me at once. 3) A check from the city for $75.90. Since that time I have been contacted by the Building Official; but while the first two items has been taken care of, item 3 remains. In your letter you asked for patience. Patience frays. A 2 May letter from the Building Official (copied to you) stated: 1) that a "bookkeeping error" by Landau Associates has now been credited evenly over the ten Harbor Hills lots, 2) that I still owed the city about $20, but 3) that he was willing to adjust this to zero to clear things up. It becomes necessary to address the Building Official's arithmetic. You will note from the packet I sent you (#1), that Landau billed $910.31 for a General Consultation (which had and has no rela- tionship to me and is not my responsibility). My lot was charged one tenth of that amount: $91.03. Whereas the Building Official freely admits in his 27 September letter to me (p. 2, 1. 1) that under Ordinance 2728 I should be billed 50% of the Landau fees charged to my lot, it is clear that jt the lot should be charged at all it should be charged 50% of $91.03, or $45.52. Thus when the Building Official states that I still owe the city about $20 he is incorrect. By his own figures the city owes me $25. This, of course, in addition to the $75 owed me that the Building Offi- cial has yet to address. In the spirit of reconciliation, having corrected the Building Official's arithmetic, I too am willing -- if we can settle this now --to ignore the additional dollars owed. 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper • • There was a time when I would have been willing to let the matter drop completely. You will understand that this is no longer the case. May we not clear this up and get it behind us? Yours, Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 cc: Richard R. Mumma Mayor Larry Naughten William Goodwin, Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin Scott Snyder, City Attorney Ogden, Murphy and Wallace 2100 Westlake Center Tower 1601 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1686 Dear Mr. Snyder, Steven E. Greenebaum City of Edmonds Writer / Musician 21 May 1991 Upon advice of Counsel, I now realize last letter to you (dated 14 May) was deficient in that it stated no time frame for re- sponse. You have had that letter for one full week. As stated in my previous two letters to you, as well as my letter to the Building Official in September of 1990, the City of Ed- monds owes me $75.90 as its half of the Cascade Geotechnical site check that it requested. I require from the City of Edmonds $78.90 ($75.90 + $3.00 incur- red by me in certified letter charges). Given that you have had my previous letter for seven days, it is not unreasonable and I do ask that you respond within two days of receipt of this letter and that I receive from the City of Edmonds $78.90 within five business days of that response. In my previous letter I stated that despite the fact.that the City owes me more, in the spirit of reconciliation I would ask only the $75.90 that I have been trying to recover since last September. You will understand that if it is necessary to pursue further action, I must and will withdraw the offer of reconcilia- tion. Yours, Steven E. Greenebaum (206) 778-2152 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper Steven E. Greenebaum Mr. Richard R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Mr. -Mumma: 7 G 1991 Writer / Musician 18 June 1991 I am in receipt of.your letter dated 29 May and, as in the past, am more than willing to try to work things out if such is possi- ble. The compiled history of my file that you sent me is most interesting. One of the complicating factors is that once again the figures have changed. But let us deal with the numbers we now have. In all cases I have used the figures your office provided me, and while I've questioned (and still question) the arithmetic used I have always assumed that you would provide accurate figures. On page two of the memo to you from your Building Inspector is the comment, "Mr. Greenebaum did not provide the City a copy of the alleged bill." Alleged bill? Such statements are not helpful, particularly when the accounting provided on page one of that same memo contains no substantiation for the new figures or ex- planation of why the old figures you supplied were inaccurate. There are, it seems, two areas of contention: 1) what I may owe the City of Edmonds, and 2) what the City of Edmonds owes me. 1) What I may owe the City of Edmonds a) It is claimed I still owe $80.41. This, however, includes the disputed charge from Landau for $71.76. To quote the memo, "The remaining charge of $71.76 is valid." Indeed? Has the Building Inspector at last uncovered the details of the bill that I had asked for and was promised last October --eight months ago? If so, I would be happy to see them. b) The Building inspector states that "in checking my math Mr. Greenebaum really owes the City $80.41." If she would continue to check her math she would find that her correction of Invoice #1670 is incorrect. As per Ordinance #2661, half of the profes- sional review charges are to be paid by the applicant. Yet the 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper page (2) Building Inspector divides Invoice #1670 by ten (ten lots). This would mean that AU the charges would be paid by the applicants. Thus the correction to invoice #1670 should be one half of $103.79 or $51,90. This still overlooks the fact that the issues raised by Landau in their "general consultation" were plat issues and, if charged to anyone, should have been charged to the devel- oper. c) Again, just using your figures (and assuming they are cor- rect), and assuming for sake of politeness that the Building In- spector has indeed come up with the details of the bill for. $71.76 that were promised me eight months ago, and for the moment even assuming that Invoice #1670 should be charged to the appli- cant at all, it may be seen that at most I would owe the city of Edmonds not $80.41 but $28.52 ($80.41 - $51.89). d) But this overlooks the notification on 4/30/91 that the Build- ing Official received from Landau that there had been an over- charge. Surely this can't refer to the overcharge mentioned in the memo on page one, as that notification is dated 10/23/90. Whatever, even allowing a charge from Landau that I believe should have been billed the developer or no one, and allowing the inclusion of the bill for $71.76 for which no details were ever provided, and assuming all City figures are correct at the abso- lute ID mu I could possibly owe is $28.52. 2) What the City owes me a) The Building Inspector refers to the "alleged bill." To re- move any question I will happily give you the invoice number. The bill is contained in Cascade Invoice number 2463. b) The Building Inspector also states that weekly reports are re- quired and that "If the Building Official had to remind Mr. Greenebaum of the Geotech's responsibility to submit the weekly reports that does not oblige the City to accept responsibility for the subsequent bill." My, my. First: the Building Official did not "remind" Mr. Greenebaum of anything. He called Cascade and sent the Geotech to the site. Second, Invoice #24.63 records for posterity that Cascade visited the site on 20 August. Thus it had been only three days since the Geotech had visited the site and not a week. Whereas no work was going on on the.site, and whereas neither I nor my builder requested Cascade come to the site but rather the Building Official of Edmonds, and whereas it had most definitely 114,E been a week since the last site visit or field report the bill for the site visit must according to Ordinance #2661 be split between the Edmonds and "the applicant." page (2) Like you, the City Attorney asked me to try to work this out. Very well. I'll go the extra mile. I'll accept your newest set of figures. If we can bring this to a close I'll even let pass the fact that the bill for which I requested information more than eight months ago is still on your list of charges despite no information whatever. Using your figures and your ordinance: I would owe the city $28.52 and the city owes me $75.90. $75.90 _28.52 $47.38 Thus, using your figures, the minimum the City of Edmonds owes me. is $47.38. I want to be reasonable. If it is received within two weeks of the date of this letter, I will accept $47.38 as payment in full and consider the matter closed. Sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 cc: Scott Snyder, City Attorney 0 BUILDING Steven E. Greeneb um MAY 1(519911 Writer / Musician 14 May 1991 Scott Snyder, City Attorney City of Edmonds Ogden, Murphy and Wallace 2100 Westlake Center Tower 1601 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1686 Dear Mr. Snyder, In my letter to you of 23 April, 1991, I wrote that within five days I required from the city of Edmonds: 1) Final approval of all necessary paperwork as to the com- pletion of the house. 2) A letter from the Building Official to Security Pacific Bank, -Edmonds branch (with a copy to me), instructing that insti- tution to release the frozen funds to me at once. 3) A check from the city for $75.90. Since that time I have been contacted by the Building Official; but while the first two items has been taken care of, item 3 remains. In your letter you asked for patience. Patience frays. A 2 May letter from the Building Official (copied to you) stated: 1) that a "bookkeeping error" by Landau Associates has now been credited evenly over the ten Harbor Hills lots, 2) that I still owed the city about $20, but 3) that he was willing to adjust this to zero to clear things up. It becomes necessary to address the Building Official's arithmetic. You will note from the packet I sent you (#1)1 that Landau billed $910.31 for a General Consultation (which had and has no rela- tionship to me'and is not my responsibility). My lot was charged one tenth of that amount: $91.03. Whereas the Building Official freely admits in his 27 September letter to me (p. 2, 1. 1) that under Ordinance 2728 I should be billed 50% of the Landau fees charged to my lot, it is clear that 1t the lot should be charged at all it should be charged 50% of $91.03, or $45.52. Thus when the Building Official states that I still owe the city about $20 he is incorrect. By his own figures the city owes me $25. This, of course, in addition to the $75 owed me that the Building Offi- cial has yet to address. In the spirit of reconciliation, having corrected the Building Official's arithmetic, I too am willing -- if we can settle this now --to ignore the additional dollars owed. 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper There was a time when I would have been willing to let the matter drop completely. You will understand that this is no longer the case. May we not clear this up and get it behind us? Yours, Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 cc: Richard R. Mumma Mayor Larry Naughten William Goodwin, Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin CITY OF EDMONDS . OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 447-7000 FAX: 447-2015 `890 199_ April 30, 1991 LARRY,S.�NAUGHTEN MAYOR Mr. Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 = Dear Mr. Greenebaum: I received yesterday, April 29, 1991, your letter of April 23, 1991, and a packet of information. I was out of the office from April 24 until April 29. I intend to review this issue with the City staff on Tuesday, April 30, and will attempt to respond to you by the end of this week, May 3. I am writing to inform you that we will review the issues. you. have raised in a timely fashion but cannot comply with, the deadine set forth in your April 23 letter. Very truly yours, OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE Got[ W. Scott Snyder WSS/klt cc: Mayor Naughten r- William Goodwin WSS53297L/0006.040.034 • 0- 006 o �v 3� Steven E. Greenebaum Writer / Musician 23 April 1991 Scott Snyder, City Attorney City of Edmonds Ogden, Murphy and Wallace 2100 Westlake Center Tower 1601 5th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101-1686 Dear Mr. Snyder, I have, over the last two years, attempted to have my home built in what is called the "Harbor Hills" area of Edmonds. I have in that time experienced delays, hindrances and other difficulties with the city that have cost me well in excess of $10,000 and quite probably in excess of $20,000. But the latest tactic of the Building Official is the last straw. Enclosed you will find copies of the relevant letters but in brief: 1) In early September of 1990 I received a bill from the city of Edmonds requesting payment of $216. 2) On 11 September I wrote the Edmonds Building Official stating that --a) I needed more information regarding the bill for $71 as it did not appear to be reasonable, b) that the bill for $54 was uncalled for as the Building Official himself had taken responsibility for it and c) that the General Consultation fee of $91 was in no way my responsibility. 3) On 27 September the Building Official sent me a letter stating --a) he w6uld request a "detailed explanation of the work performed", b) that he had indeed agreed to pay for the expense 10. reflected by the $54 and c) that he still felt the General Con- sultation fee was my responsibility. In his opinion I therefore now owed the city $162. He enclosed a copy of ordinance #2728. 4) On 3 October I wrote the Building Official stating that I awaited the promised "detailed explanation," and carefully laying out why the General Consultation had no relevance to me whatso- ever (not to mention the fact that the figure is wrong on the face of it --though as the bill has no relevance to me I have not concerned myself with the Building Official's arithmetic). I also requested that he contact you i_t I= were unsure aa tQ my reasoning. Beyond this, thanks to a careful reading of ordinance #2728, I realized that the Edmonds owed me $75 for a $150 bill I paid in full and for which Edmonds had a 50% liability. I re- quested reimbursement. I received no reply to my letter, no reimbursement for the $75 Edmonds owes me, no "detailed explanation" for the charges the 1114 Daley Place / Edmonds, WA 98020 100% recycled paper Building Official had asked me to pay and no response to My detailed explanation as to why the General Consultation might well concern the developer but in no way concerned me. I assumed that the Building Official had let the matter drop and decided to let the $75 owed me drop as well. This.brings you up to the present. I returned home from vacation last week to find a letter from the Building Inspector on behalf of the Building Official dated 5 April. I had been required by the city of Edmonds to place dur- ing construction $25,000 into a frozen account for "site restora- tion." I was now informed that unless I paid $162 to the city the Building Official would not allow the release of the funds -- funds placed aside solely fgL JI& purpose Dj site restoration. I checked with my builder. The house has passed every inspection including all final inspections from the city's own inspectors as well a the geo-technical engineer (this had yet to be done at the time of the 5 April letter but was done immediately thereafter). I called the Building Official on the phone. I was told that he never answered my 3 October 1990 letter because he didn't feel it worthwhile. I was further informed that in spite of all the re- quired inspections having been performed and passed that he, as Building Official, would hold up all final paperwork on the house --including the release of the site restoration funds --until I capitulated and paid the $162. Thus despite the fact that my letter was never answered and despite the fact that the promised "detailed explanations" were never forthcoming, I was instructed to pay as directed under the threat of not having the frozen site restoration monies returned to me. The sole response to my phone call was to send me still another copy of the bill (as if that was what the call concerned) and demand payment. There is one and only one word for such behavior: extortion. I have taken a lot from the city of Edmonds. This I will not take. Still, I believe a lawsuit should always be the last resort. I will, therefore, make one final attempt at reconciliation. Within five business days of your receipt of this letter I re- quire from the city of Edmonds: 1) Final approval of all necessary paperwork as to the com- pletion of the house. 2) A letter from the Building Official to Security Pacific Bank, Edmonds branch (with a copy to me), instructing that insti- tution to release the frozen funds to me at once. 3) A check from the city for $75.90. Failing the above, I will be left with no recourse other than legal. In preparation for that I have secured with Security Pacific a line of credit --as the frozen $25,000 is needed to pay the builder for completing the house. Clearly, if further action is needed no settlement will be possible without reimbursement for legal fees, loan fees and interest, and any and all other costs incurred. Yours, —6-� . _e_- ��� Steven E. Greenebaum 1114 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 encls. cc: Mayor Larry Naughten William Goodwin, Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin 890 1qc� CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering April 18, 1991 Steven Greenbaum 19508 80th Ave. W #Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Lot 3 Harbor Hills LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Dear Sir: As you requested by telephone on 4/17/91, enclosed are copies of bills and the invoice for professional services rendered -on your building permit. Please remit amounts due at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Sincerely; 4eannine Graf Plans Examiner Encls. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1029 EDMONDS, WA 98020 /99O (206) 778-0907 Project: 74-011.10 General Consultation Invoice No. 1702 Harbor Hills Sub and Adj. Lots August 22, 1990 Page number 1 City of Edmonds Attn: Mr. Dick Mumma 250 5th Ave No. Edmonds WA 98020 Progress Billing W/E 07 Jul thru 28 Jul 1990 Personnel Charges -------------- Hours Rate Amount Associate 6.00 88.00 528.00 Senior Geologist 3.50 78.00 273.00 Project Coordinator .75 41.00 30.75 Word Processor & Operator 1.25 39.00 48.75 Support Staff .75 29.00 21.75 Total Personnel Charges 12.25 902.25 Reimbursables/Equipment ----------------------- Amount Copies Facsimile Machine Project Billing Summary 4.56 3.50 Total Expense: 8.06 TOTAL THIS PERIOD Prior Current Total Personnel Charges 2,305.75 902.25 3,208.00' Reimbursables/Equipment 28.98 8.06 37.04 Total: 2,33.4.73 910.31 3,245.04 Thank You For Your Business Cl1Af(ie & q/o. 3 / = /e /o7is = .ly �?/, 03 902.25 8.06 910.31 Payable Within 30 Days of Invoice •890 19q- 0 I Nv DICE 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 51-, AVE N - EDMONDS. %Va 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning -. Parks and Recreation • Engineering BILLED TO: STEVEN GREENBAUM INVOICE NO. 19508 80th Ave W #Apt B DATE 9/27/90 GRANT NO. Landau Invoice #1701 $ 71.76 Landau General Consultation 91.03 TOTAL $162.79 PLEASE ENCLOSE ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. THANK YOU. '.`�wOn��i7iti�� � • • t • • � � �iR��A1i1�J Project: • BUILDING LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. AEG 241990: P.O. BOX 1029 EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 778-0907 74-009.10 Geotechnical Review, Invoice No. 1701 Greenbaum SFR, *3 Harbor Hills -August 22, 1990 Page number 1 • City of Edmonds Attn: Mr. Dick Mumma 250 5th Ave No. Edmonds WA 98020 Progress Billing W/E 07 Jul thru 28 Jul 1990 Personnel Charges ----------------- Hours Rate Senior Geologist 1.50 78.00 Word Processor &. Operator .25 39.00 Support Staff .50 29.00 Total Personnel Charges 2.25 Reimbursables/Equipment ----------------------- Copies Project Billing Summary Amount 117.00 9.75 14.50 141.25 141.25 Amount 2.28 Total Expense: 2.28 2.28 TOTAL THIS PERIOD 143.53 Prior Current Total Personnel Charges 1,249.25 141.25 1;390.50 Reimbursables/Equipment 21.17 2.28 23.45 Total: 1,270.42 143.53 1,413.95 Thank You For Your Business Payable Within 30 Days of Invoice w � CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR r COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN f Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR 8go. 19C� April 5, 1991 Steven Greenebaum 19508 80th Avenue W, Apt B Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Lot 3 Harbor Hills Permit #900607 The City is in receipt of the required insurance policy for the subject residence. This policy is required to be continually posted with the City for a period of ten years. The policy may not lapse at any time during this period or the occupancy of home may be jeopardized. The following items are outstanding as required by the Earth Subsidence Ordinance: A final construction report from the geo-technical engineer is required. The report must contain a statement that, based on site observation, testing and monitoring, the completed development is in substantial compliance with the recommendations of the geo-technical report. All outstanding progress field reports should be immediately submitted for Building Department review. A final construction report is also required from your structural design engineer. A statement must be included that provides verification that the as -built home complies with the design. Professional service fees of $162.79 are due from invoice of September 27, 1990. After all items are submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Building Official, the site restoration bond can be released. A separate letter of bond release will be mailed to you at that time. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Inspector LOT3FINL/TXTDOS62 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 'BUILDING OCT 4 1990 Mr. Richard.R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Mumma, 3 October 1990 I am in receipt of your letter dated 27 September. I appreciate your including a copy of ordinance #2728. Though I am familiar with the ordinance, it is good to have the specifics of the lan- guage at hand for reference. There remain two rather separate concerns, and one new one. The first matter is the additional charge from Landau for work done regarding my lot. I appreciate your continuing efforts to secure from Landau what this charge regards and await that infor- mation. As you know, on 1 August I paid the required plan check fee, as submitted to me by the city of Edmonds. As to Landau's charge for work on reviewing the plat, you might wish to check with Mr. Snyder as I believe he will concur that this is not my liability. Landau persistently brought up what it believed the developer should or should not have done regarding the plat. Be that as it may, the city approved the plat before I purchased the lot. Also: 1) Referring to its scope, ordinance #2728 states, "The city shall require review of the submittals accompanying the applica- tion . . . to determine whether the submittals were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice or the practice of the particular speciality." There is no reference to work regarding the plat --nor would one expect mention aa tb@ city hsad already approved fb& plat. 2) The work Landau refers to was, according to Landau's own records, undertaken after 1 July. This takes on weight because at the 27 June meeting attended by you, Landau and others, the representative from Landau expressly stated ha my architect Alld J,Q me, that he wanted t4 see only a detail -Qf one proposed change regardina fh= house, that there were = further concerns,=with ID-t .three and that tb& problems Landau had with fha p.] at did ng-t affect l4h three. Thus: 1) The city had approved the plat before I bought the lot, and any problems Landau has, had or will have with the plat is between the city, the developer and Landau and should be billed accordingly. page 2 2) Even if there were at one time some justification for a pro rata billing of lot three for Landau's work concerning the plat, that justification ended with Landau's statement on 27 June that any problems with the plat did not concern lot three. Mr. Mumma, you have been placed in a supremely difficult if not ulcer producing position and I appreciate the work and frustra- tion you have faced --not to mention the flack. I truly have no desire to add to it. But the billing regarding Landau's work on the plat has no relation to ordinance #2728 and simply is not my liability. Speaking of liabilities brings us to the new concern. Among my bills from Cascade Geotechnical is a charge for $151.80 for site work that #.ha gitX _(2f Edmonds requested on 23 August (it was a day that no work was going on on the lot --when I asked both Cas- cade and my builder about it I was informed that your office had requested the site visit). Whereas the city of Edmonds requested the visit, and whereas ordinance #2728 specifically cites city - requested geological review as an expense to be shared equally, this is clearly supposed to be a shared expense. The city's share of this billing is $75.90. Yours sincerely, f Steven E. Greenebaum 19508 80th Avenue W Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 cc: William Goodwin, Montgomery, Purdue Karen Weisman, The Weisman Studio CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 890-199_ September 27, 1990 Steven E. Greenbaum 19508 80th Avenue W., Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: ADDITIONAL FEES FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Mr. Greenbaum: I have reviewed your letter of September 11, 1990, and have the following response to your three concerns: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Regarding Item 1, I will request a detailed explanation of the work performed by Landau on your lot. The work was conducted at my request to determine if events taking place on your lot were in compliance with the plans and specifications and with generally accepted engineering practices. Regarding Item 2,1 did agree to pay for the cost of the testing done on the three properties fronting Olympic Avenue and will direct the Permit Coordinator to adjust the billing to delete that charge. Regarding Item 3, there is a close relationship between the individual lots and the development of the short plat. There were conditions established in the short plat that required satisfaction during the development of each individual lot. Soils reports made specific mention to installation of drainage during the development of individual lots. Review of these plat conditions was necessary to insure that: 1) development on your site did not impact surrounding sites in the short plat; and, 2) construction on your site specific, and in the short plat in general, did not impact surrounding properties. S Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Steven E. Greenbaum September 27, 1990 Page Two Pursuant to Ordinance 2728, we have charged you 50% of the fees for our consultant to review the items mentioned above in Items 1 and 3. I have enclosed a copy of this ordinance for your review; also, a revised bill. If you have any further questions, feel free to call me at 771-3202. RICHARD R. MUMMA Building Official RRM/sfn Enclosures GREENBAU/TXTSFN61 89•p.19 • I N V O I C E • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 • I'm AVE N • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering BILLED TO: STEVEN GREENBAUM INVOICE NO. 19508 80th Ave W #Apt B DATE 9/27/90 GRANT NO. Landau Invoice #1701 $ 71.76 Landau General Consultation 91.03 TOTAL $162.719 PLEASE ENCLOSE ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. THANK YOU. Accounting: 001.000.000.322.40.00 11 September 1990 Ms. Jeannine Graf Permit Coordinator City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Jeannine, I have received three bills from the city of Edmonds and was told to remit my checks to you. No checks are enclosed but I thought that a copy of the letter as to why I have sent no checks should be sent to you. - Please do find enclosed the materials you asked me to file with the county. Yours sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 19508 80th Avenue W Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 enc: letter to Richard R. Mumma Covenant to Notify Idemnity and Hold Harmless Oc 11 September 1990 Mr. Richard R. Mumma Building Official City of Edmonds 205 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Dick, I am in receipt of your bills concerning: 1) Additional Landau work on my lot (inv #1701), 2) Schwartz vibration testing, and 3) Landau work on the Plat (inv #1702). Please send me more information on item U. When my permit was issued I was billed for Landau's work on my lot. Before paying for additional work I need to know why the work was necessary. As to item #2, I was contacted some time ago by Mark McNaughton and agreed to pay one tenth of the estimated $700 bill for testing. This I will do. I cannot agree that I should be charged for redundant testing (please see enclosed letter) that the city decided to have done and for which the city stated it would pay. Regarding item 03, this is plat work. Throughout, Landau has raised plat issues. When I bought my lot the plat was jEErgved. If Landau has problems with the plat that is between Landau and the city and perhaps, if indeed problems were found regarding the plat, the developer, Kevin Hanchett. It has nothing to do with me or my lot. Yours sincerely, Steven E. Greenebaum 19508 80th Avenue W Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 cc: Mark McNaughton, Homestyle Construction William Goodwin, Montgomery, Purdue Jeannine Graf, Permit Coordinator, City of Edmonds S 4 • TR ION: September 11, 1990 Steven Greenbaum 19508 80th Ave. Apt. B Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Greenbaum, As you are aware, the City of Edmonds required a vibration analysis at -Harbor Hills before they would allow any construction vehicles or equipment to access the site for construction. The test was performed on July 7, 1990 and a report issued on July 8, 1990. We took the initiative to complete the vibration study as requested by the City of Edmonds for the 10 lot owners at Harbor Hills. On Wednesday, July 5, 1990, Dick Mumma, the City Building . Official, was informed by telephone that we would be conducting the vibration study on Friday morning. The reasons for informing him were two -fold, 1) in the event concerned neighbors called and requested information on the activity at the site and 2) in case any special arrangements needed to be made with the City. Mr. Mumma was appreciative of the call and glad to hear the study was going to be completed. On the morning of July 7, 1990 while we were conducting the vibration analysis Mrs. -Hall called the City and talked --with Mr. Mumma and was concerned that our testing was causing vibration on her property. Mr. Mumma went to the test site and met with Sigmund D. Schwarz after the testing, required by the City, was completed and requested that Mr. Schwarz reset his equipment to analyze the vibration on the neighbor's site. Mr. Schwarz explained that he had not contracted with Hanestyle Construction or any other lot owners in Harbor Hills to complete a study on the adjacent properties and that Mr. Mumma's request would be additional cost. Mr. Mumma agreed that the City would be responsible for the cost of the additional testing and the testing and billing from Schwarz were conducted accordingly. The City is responsible for the additional billing and had agreed to pay the costs of the additional testing. Any additional billing beyond the testing performed by Homestyle Construction at the direction of the City is unfounded and incorrect. If the City 221 James St., Suite 100 Edmonds, WA 98020 (206) 778-6866 bad wanted the adjacent properties tested they should have informed us rather than rehiring the vibration analyst after we had completed the work requested by the City. Please call.if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Mark A. McNaugh on, Authorized Agent Hcmestyle Construction cc: Kevin Hanchett 221 James St., Suite 100 Edmonds. V(/,A -S020 206) 778-68E� .890 19c- • NV I OI,CE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 51h AVE N • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering BILLED TO: STEVEN GREENBAUM INVOICE NO. 19508 80th Ave W #Apt B DATE 9/27/90 GRANT NO. Landau Invoice #1701 Landau General Consultation $ 71.76 91.03 TOTAL $162.79 PLEASE ENCLOSE ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. THANK YOU. .890...,9C)_ I N V O I C E CITY OF EDMONDS 250 • 511) AVE N • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering BILLED TO: Steven Greenbaum INVOICE NO. 19508 80th Ave W.Apt B DATE August 28, 1990 Edmonds, WA 98020 GRANT NO. Landau Associates Invoice # 1701 Schwartz Vibration Testing Landau General Consultation 61A'00 A144t 4#10e 4'0'- All f/a/,6o--, f/,f//f Z& C� we///hly Awl Total Charge $143.53 One Half = $71.76 Total Charge $540.40 One Tenth= $54.04- Total Charge $910.31 One Tenth= $91.03 Total Amount Due $ 216.83 PLEASE ENCLOSE ONE COPY OF THIS INVOICE WITH YOUR REMITTANCE. THANK YOU. �� ... ,.. •.! • fiUILpII4G AUG 2 4 t99� LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 1029 EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 778-0907 Project: 74-009.10 Geotechnical Review Invoice No. 1701 Greenbaum SFR, *3 Harbor Hills August 22, 1990 Page number 1 City of Edmonds Attn: Mr. Dick Mumma 250 5th Ave No. Edmonds WA 98020 Progress Billing W/E 07 Jul thru 28 Jul 1990 Personnel Charges ----------------- Hours Rate Senior Geologist 1.50 78.00 Word Processor & Operator .25 39.00 Support Staff .50 29.00 Total Personnel Charges 2.25 Reimbursables/Equipment ----------------------- Amount 2.28 Total Expense: 2.28 2.28 TOTAL THIS PERIOD 143.53 Copies Project Billing Summary Amount 117.00 9.75 14.50 141.25 141.25 Prior Current Total Personnel Charges 1,249.25 141.25 1,390,50 Reimbursables/Equipment 21.17 2.28 23.45 Total: 1,270.42 143.53 1,413.95 Thank You For Your Business Payable Within 30 Days of Invoice Z zl- ' - 0 SIGMUND D. SCHWARZ Consulting Geologist/Geophysicist P.O. Box 82-917 Kenmore. WA 98028 (206) B23-5596 City of Edmonds Building and Planning Department 250 5th North Edmonds, Washington Att: Dick Mumma INVOICE: • BUILDING AUG 131990 July 10, 1990 S84-90IB Prorata share of services performed in connection with vibration measurements, analysis of data and preparation of "Report of Additional Vibration Testing, Harbor Hills Development, Edmonds, Washington" dated July 8, 1990. Senior geophysicist 16 hrs @ $70.00/hr $1120.00 Recording instruments 1 day @$100.00/day 100.00 Recording chart 42 ft @ $1.00/ft 42.00 Film and processing 14.15. Truck 30 mi @ $0.35/mi 10.50 Total $1286.65 Homestyle Construction share 58%= $746.25 City of Edmonds Share 42Z= $540.40 7MI- �A C ��f �`3yo, yo oy 4. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. 'q!/(� 4 1029 EDMONDS, WA98020 �g /990 (206) 778-0907 Project: 74-011.10 General Consultation Invoice No. 1702 Harbor Hills Sub and Adj. Lots August 22, 1990 Page number 1 City of Edmonds Attn: Mr. Dick Mumma 250 5th Ave No. Edmonds WA 98020 Progress Billing W/E 07 Jul thru 28 Jul 1990 Personnel Charges ----------------- Hours Rate Associate 6.00 88.00 Senior Geologist 3.50 78.00 Project Coordinator .75 41.00 Word Processor & Operator 1.25 39.00 Support Staff .75 29.00 Total Personnel Charges 12.25 Reimbursables/Equipment ----------------------- Copies Facsimile Machine Project Billing Summary Amount 528.00 273.00 30.75 48.75 21.75 902.25 Amount 4.56 3.50 Total Expense: 8.06 TOTAL THIS PERIOD Prior Current Total Personnel Charges 2,305.75 902.25 3,208.00 Reimbursables/Equipment 28.98 8.06 37.04 Total: 2,33.4.73 910.31 3,245.04 Thank You For Your Business 701-41. 01A-f6 If & '%f 4, 3 / = le- / c7L = "� �?/, 0.3 902.25 8.06 910.31 Payable Within 30 Days of Invoice MEMORANDUM August 7, 1990 TO: Jeannine Graff, Permit Coordinator FROM: John Bissell, Code Enforcement Tech. SUBJECT: Greenebaum Building Permit, Lot 3, Harbor Hills On 8/2/90 the Planning Division received a letter from the Architect of the aforementioned building permit. Said letter.revised the height calculations of the proposed building.as per the property survey. The provided information is adequate for the Planning Division requirement. Please place these documents in the proper file. R E N W E I S M A N A l A R C H I- T E C T U R E August 2, 1990 Mr. John E. Bissell City of Edmonds Planning Division 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Greenbaum Residence Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Bissell: This letter is documenting the conversation I had with you at the counter on August 2nd at 10:30 in the morning. The subject of this letter is the 25 foot height limit of the residence on lot three at Harbor Hills. I am going. to be changing to datum points, two, corners from my original drawing submitted to the City of Edmonds (Sheet 1 Greenebaum Residence). The Northwest corner which I interpolated to be 247.5 noted as point B, is in actuality 249 as also shown on the survey submitted with our original set of drawings prepared by Steven Beardsly of Louell Saureland ' and Associates I had interpolated the contours instead.of using the spot elevations which the surveyor had given us. This was an error on my part. I am also changing. point C which I interpolated to be 242 feet. It will now be 243 feet. Points A and D remain the same. My height calculations are revised as follows. Height Calculations: Datum Point - Top of monument in case located at center of cul-de-sac, Daley Place. Elevation 229.49 + 100 Reference Point A-122.51 Point B=119.51 Point C - 113.51 Point D-116.51 472.04 A=118.01 Average Grade Maximum elevation allowed = 25 + 118.01=143.01 Actual ridgeline = 143.01 True elevation = 43.01 + 229.49 = 272.5 G /ALL -5 . A v3 In actuality we are raising the ridge about nine inches; still meeting the 25 foot height limit. This letter is for your information and I will be sending a copy to Mr. Dick Mumma for our Lot Three file. --Continued-- 2329 EAST MADISON STREET SEATTLE, "WA 98112 • (206) 323-5614 Mr. John E. Bissell • City of Edmonds • The Weisman Studio August 2, 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions or would like to discuss this please feel free to call me. Thank you. 1 Karen Weisman, AIA Weisman Studio cc: Steven Greenbaum for Ryan KW:sd J U L- 2 6- 9 0 T H U 8: 1 8 W e i-_ m aL n Dk-- s i S CASCADE GE&ECHNICAL, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 921.5090 _ KIRKLAND, WA$HINGtON 99034 FAX: (206)823.2203 April 16, 1990 Job No. 9002-05G Steven Greenebaum 19509 80th Ave. W., Apt. B Edmonds, Washington 99020 Reference: Harbor Mills Lot 3 Edmonds, Washington Dear Steven: n G r o u F1 0 - P.02 As requested, we have prepared this letter to address recent issues raised by the City of Edmonds regarding the above site prior to permit approval. This Letter specifically addresses th6 issues discussed with the City of Edmonds Planning department and City Attorhey on March 13, 1990 and in the letter dated February 28, 1990 prepared by Landau Associates, Inc. As we discussed with Dick Mumma of the city of Edmonds Planning Department and Scott Snyder, the city of Edmonds attorney, it is our conclusion that a Landslide Hazard Hap with an assestment of risk based on percent probability is not necessary or appropriate for the Harbor Hills Development. Tne Landslide Hazard Map that was prepared for the Meadowdale area is specific to that site based on an: analysis done a number of years ago by other firms. Such an analysis is not appropriate for the Harbor Hills development. We co�pleted a Phrase I subsurface soils study of the Harbor hills development dated December 5, 1984, for site preparation, utility placement and access road construction. The analysis was based on air photograph interpretation, review of geologic maps and test pits excavated on the site. The City :of Edmonds accepted our report and Issued permits for the Phase I Work. Additional subsurface study and laboratory work was done on thie site during the Phase I site work. A Hydrologic Analysis t'Was done in 1986 by GeoEngineers xneorporated, test borings were done by our firth with laboratory analysis in 1987, a vibration tasting study was dons by Sigmund Schwartz in 1989, and periodic monitoring of tha site work, drain installation and site excavation was done by our office during all of tho Phase I work, JUL-26-9�0 THU 9 ` 1 April ;i6, 1990 Steve Greenebaum Job N 9002-050 Page 2 9 We i S•atanDes V n G r C)uP • CASCADE GEOTECHNIt-AL P . 03 After completion of the Phase I site work, additional test pits were xcavated to observe the subsurface conditions on each. of the individual lots. This study was summarized in our report dated May 231 1099 and provided preliminary recommendations for each site with generalized recommendations for foundation design and drainage based'on overall site conditions. We returned to Lot 3 to conduct additional test pits . within the propo4Qd building area and driveway. We prepared a preliminary report dated october 301 1989 that provided: ipocific recommendations for subsurface drainage and construction' of the driveway subgrade based on the preliminary plans discussed with the architect. We were. not ,informed that the Meadowdale Notebook procedures would be required for the Harbor Hills development until after completion of the Lot 3 report. We believd t�a,t all necessary information for the Meadowdalo Notebook is incjuded in the reports we have provided. It is our conclusion that we have sufficient information tb deliniiate the subsurface conditions of the site and th'Q slopb stabiiity. We do not feel that additional test borings are necessary to further investigate the subsurface conditions of the site., A1thoggn topographic evidence suggests the possibility of ancient movement, we noticed no sign of deep seated slope instabilitj� within the Harbor Hills development. During excavation far the cul de sao on the upper portion of the plat, near lot 41 there vas somb surf itial movement within saturated) organic soils. The failure was within the upper two (2) to three (3) feet of material and was buttressed immediately with quarry spalls and fill. This area was not located within lot 3. The bunch area of lot 3 appears to be a out pad, as noted 'in our phase I report. We noted an existing rockery and an old drain field on the site during our study. We rioted some fill above the drain field on the site. We have been provided with revised plans, sheets 1, 5, and 8 prepared by The Weisman Studio dated 3/9/90 in addition to a revised Environmental Checklist. We were present during the recent installation of a French drain on the east side of the lot and the construction of the driveway subgrade. Our review of the ravisaad documents indicate that fill is not proposed for support of the house. Recent work done on the lot ahowe4 an old drain field within the proposed house location. Grade stakes placed for construction of the driveway indicated that the drain field is approximately at the proposed footing elevation. .TUL—Zfs-9;FJ THU :5 1 April 16, 1990 steveh Greenebaum Job Na. 9002-OSG page 3 `9 W E 1 smoLnD e_ 19 CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL n G r CO. u P • It will be necessary to remove the drain pipe and rock within the building area down to native soil. It appears that the footings will )be seated on native soil. A plan for temporary erosion shows hay bales with a filter fabric fence control on the west and south sides of the building site. It appears that this will be sufficient for temporary erosion control during Construction. we recommend that the slope.east of the pioposed paved area be regraded to a 2H:1v slope and protected permanently from erosion with landscaping or. some other.for'm of protection. It appears from the topographic survey that theme is sufficient area to regrade the slope. If seepage is noted 'from the slope face, we recommend placing hand driven sand points which are tightlined to the stream channel north of the lot. Our review of the available geologic maps for this area indicate that the site has been mapped as recessional sands and glacial till of the Vashon Stade. Our field analysis is in accordance with the regional geologic mapping.done by others. The letter prepared by Landau correctly notes that the Harbor Hills area is located within a ground water discharge area. The problems associated with surface seepage have been addressed in the recommendations for drainage in all of our reports. A French drain wan raegntly installed on the east side oe the lot and putletB into the flowing stream on the north side of the property. The recommendations provided in our Phase II report were, to place horizontal, drains in this area. Additional subsurface information indicated that a French drain would be sufficient if based on the propooed building elevations. The French drain does not extend to the south property line beoausa tho topography drops in this area and the outlet is to the north. To maintain sufficient fall from the southeast corner of the site would have required a deep trench excavated at the base of the stee 'slope. We recommended against excav&ting a deep at the base of the steep slope. We understand from conversations with the architect and review of the Driveway Plan prepared by Lovell Sauerland and Associates dated 9/29/89 that all roof and footing drains will be tightlined to the existing storm stub on Daley Place. The tightlines will extend under the driveway to the outlets. Based on our analysis and experience on this site and in the area, it is our conclusion that there is. less than a 30% chance of movement on lot 3 within a 20 year period. It is our judgment that the plans and specifications we reviewed conforms to the recommendations in our soilslgeotechnical report prepared for the Harbor Hills development and this lot. The risk of damage to they JUL-26-9{0 THU 20 W--- i r.MCLnD---s i V nGr ouP P. 05 0 • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL �-•` April-16, 1990 steveA Greenebaum Job NO. 9002-OSC Page 4 proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the Condition3 $46t forth in our reports. The proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement if our recommendations are followed. We trust that this provides sufficient information for youi needs. Shoul¢ you have additional questions, feel free to contact us at any t' ve. $ inters X�( � •,, . CASCA.b EOTECNNZC • a '�v�• 'R� ' G r, 7 •�•.,..• Pri c4 al Engi er "'''70N;\" Pe er' Jew Engineer' g Geologist PJ:pg cc: The Weisman Design Group: Attn: Karen Weisman CASCADE GEO. ECHNICALJNC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE (206) 821-5080 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 FAX: (206) 823.2203 July 23, 1990 Job No. 9002-05G • JUt 301990 0 Kevin Hanchett 8504 231st SW Edmonds, Washington 98020 Reference: Drainage -installation and sequencing Harbor.Hills Edmonds, Washington Dear Kevin: We have prepared this letter at the request of, Dick Mumma of the City of Edmonds.. Mr. Mumma has requested that we provide this letter to summarize our recommendations for installation and sequencing of drainage at the above site. Enclosed with this letter is a copy of a map we recently prepared for our letter dated July 16, 1990. . The map shows -the existing topography, drainage presently. installed, and.proposed drainage. There may be additional drainage installed which is. note -shown on this map for lots for which we have not prepared a soils report. It is our conclusion that the rechanneled surface runoff and the drainage installed now for the overall subdivision is sufficient. Additional drainage has been recommended for each individual lot based on the proposed building locations and grades.. We recommend that.the drainage for Lot 3.be completely installed prior to excavation proceeding' on Lots 1 and 2. Additional drainage may be.necessary on Lot-6 prior to construction on Lot 7. We are in the process, of observing additional test ..pits to determine if this will be.necessary. We recommend that the -french (interceptor) drains and yard drains be installed on each'lot prior to excavating for the foundations. The drains should be installed and connected to tightlines.before any excavation proceeds. down slope. We should be engaged to observe installation of all drainage to provide immediate on -site recommendations. The contractors for each lot should be. prepared to install additional drainage if necessary. Horizontal drains may. be necessary for cut slopes if seepage is encountered during • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL • July 23, 1990 Kevin Hanchett Job No. 9002-05G Page 2 construction. Contractors should -be familiar with this procedure or have access to 'a qualified subcontractor to install these drains immediately. We will provide recommendations for the horizontal drains for each lot as part of ,our. -on -site monitoring. The successful development of this site will depend on installation of proper drainage, strict adherence to our recommendations and to the approved plans, and qualified monitoring of site. conditions during construction to provide additional or alternate recommendations to address specific site conditions. We recommend that we be. engaged to review all applicable plans and monitor all.drainage installation and site excavation. We trust that this provides .sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL •`'�1' Vj�4A 'g' G rge E. mb, P.E. FS%p...•Eti `` S \(11 d• PrincTipal Engineer - -,• Peter J ett Enginrring Geologist PJ:pg Enclosure CC:. City of Edmonds;.Attn: Dick Mumma Landau Associates; Attn: William Evans Lawrence Yuan Associates; Attn: Larry Yuan Weisman Design . Group ; Attn : - Karen . Weisman Sandy Olson Homestyle.Construction; Attn: Mark McNaughton Barbara Clark CASCADE GE91ECHNICAL • A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 March 14, 1990 Job No. 8910-08G Kevin Hanchett 8504 231st S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Kevin Hanchett Reference: Stop Work, Permit # 890951 Construction of driveway and drainage installation Lot 3, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Dear Kevin: This letter is to inform you of the stop work order from the City of Edmonds for construction of the driveway and installation of the French drain on Lot 3 of Harbor Hills. As you know, construction of the driveway began March 9, 1990 and the stop work order occurred today at about 10:00 am. We have been on -site continuously to monitor the construction of the driveway to confirm that work was done in accordance with the recommendations in our letter dated October 30, 1989. Due to the wet conditions encountered during the excavation, additional and alternate recommendations have been required. Construction of the driveway was done first to allow access for equipment and material to install the French drain on the building lot that we recommended. At the time of the stop work order, a majority of the driveway had been completed and the trench had been partially excavated for the installation of the perforated pipe and washed rock. Temporary cuts had been made at the toe of the slope on the east side of the lot and there were open excavations within the area of the driveway. The cuts were to temporary only and are not considered safe for any length of time. A City of Edmonds inspector visited the site this morning to stop the work. We understand that the work was stopped because the permit allows the removal of no more than 500 yards of material. Bill Johnson, the on -site supervisor for West Coast construction, has informed us that only 310 yards have been removed based on the truck tickets he has. r 0 • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL March 14, 1990 Kevin Hanchett Page 2 It is our conclusion that work should continue immediately on this project. The cuts and excavations made upto this time are stable for temporary construction purposes only and should not be left unprotected for any length of time. If the City of Edmonds denies the continuation of work, we can not be responsible for the slope failures or cost overruns that will likely occur. This issue is critical for the stability of this site and should be resolved immediately. We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact us at any time.. Sincerely, PJ:pg 1 Engineer ring Geologist CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 77 1 -3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTo4 March 14, 1990 Kevin Hanchett 8504 231st Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE:' Lot 3 Harbor Hills Grading Permit #890951 for Driveway In response to a citizens complaint, the City of Edmonds has made an investigation of the subject site. The City has also been in contact with your representative, Paul Sather of West Coast Construction. Mr. Sather has indicated that the on -site grading has already exceeded the approved grading amount of 96 cubic yards. He has also indicated that the total amount of grading may even exceed the 500 cubic yard threshold, which requires a conditional use permit. You are hereby notified that a STOP WORK order has been posted at the subject site for grading that exceeds the scope of the work as indicated on the face of the approved permit. Please note a conditional use permit is required for grading in excess of 500 cubic yards. Contact Duane Bowman in the Planning Department for submittal requirements for conditional use permits. If the total grading is less than 500 cubic yards, a revised grading plan prepared by your licensed engineer still must be submitted to the City for review. The STOP WORK order shall not be lifted until this matter is resolved. Continued work under a STOP WORK order is a violation of Chapter 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and subject to criminal penalties as described therein. Thank you, k�annine L. Graf Permit .Coordinator cc: West Coast Construction Paul Sather • Incorporated August 11. 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan. Japan CASCADE GEO CHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 BUILDING March 7, 1990 MAR 13 1990 Job No. 9002-05G Kevin Hanchett 8504 231st SW Edmonds, Washington 98020 Reference: Harbor Hills Daley Place Edmonds, Washington Dear Kevin: We have recently received preliminary geotechhical.review letters for lots 3 and, 9 from Landau Associates Inc. dated February 28 ( lot 3) and March 1 (lot 9).. Landau Associates prepared the letters at the request of 'the City. of -Edmonds. We are preparing individual letters which address specific comments made by Landau'Associated for each lot. - We have prepared this letter to comment on issues raised by Landau Associates that concern the entire Harbor Hills Development. As you may recall, we completed a Phase I- subsurface soils study dated December 5, 1989, for site preparation, utility placement and access road construction.. The. City of Edmonds accepted our report and, issued permits for the Phase I work. The, Phase I work was done with our periodic monitoring. After Phase I work was completed, we conducted an additional subsurface evaluation of the site utilizing backhoe test pits and prepared a preliminary Phase II report dated May 25, 1989,, that provided general lot development recommendations. After completion of the Phase II report, the City of Edmonds decided that.individual reports for each lot were required and that the reports should conform to the Meadowdale Checklist (City. Ordinance No. 266i). The City of Edmonds decision to require the Meadowdale Checklist was a change from all previous work done'at the.site. At no time were we informed that'the previous work was -insufficient and that additional subsurface study beyond what we considered adequate was required'. Prior to conducting additional soils studies for each lot, we contacted Dwayne Bowman of the City of, Edmonds Planning Department to discuss the requirements of the additional soils -reports: Specifically, we discussed the requirements for additional 0 • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL March 7, 1990 Kevin Hanchett Page 2 subsurface study and the preparation of a Landslide Hazard Vicinity Map. He informed us at that time that additional subsurface study would not be necessary and that a Landslide Hazard Map would not be required if , V'kn'o r professio`na1 opinion', we:'d da`not':feel`-_it-was A#.iy ,essary ,.°;, ... We proceeded with the understanding that some items within the Meadowdale Checklist would not be necessary if it was our professional opinion that they are not necessary, as noted in ardriarice' 2661{.`Section':4:,. Paragraph. a (:ECDE T9 05_sU30B) We have reviewed the letters prepared by Landau Associated Inc. for lots 3 and 9. Both of these letters note the lack of a Landslide Hazard Vicinity Map, The lack of assessment of risk based on percent probability, and indicated that the City may require the installation of piezometer and an assessment of landslide potential based upon seasonal ground water changes. � our'professional'opiriion that a`Lands1?ide!�Hazard:.Vicinity..., y agd =,t assessment.: r of -:. ',risk >;based on percent probability is inappropriate for the Harbor Hills Development. The Landslide Hazard Map that was prepared for the Meadowdale area is specific to that site based on an analysis done a number of years ago by other firms. We do not feel that such an analysis is necessary or appropriate for the Harbor'Hills Development. ` �t'� 's TourRprofess'ional. opinion that we have sufficient information and analysis on the area to comment on the site stability. We have been involved with the project for a number of years, supplying detailed reports to the City of Edmonds Which were accepted for permit, providing construction monitoring during the Phase I construction, and testifying in public hearings. At no time were we asked to provide additional or alternate exploration for the We recommend that the City of Edmonds define exactly their requirements, if any, for additional study necessary to obtain building permits. We request that the.City, or Landau Associates as their consultant, provide a specific and detailed scope of defined work for any additional subsurface analysis necessary to obtain the building permits. We will be happy to coordinate this with Landau Associates or a responsible authority of the City of Edmonds. We recommend that these issues be resolved before continuing with any further work .on the site. We have contacted Dwayne Bowman, Jerry Saterly, Dick Mumma, and Peter Han at the City of Edmonds and have been unable to sufficiently resolve the issues in order to continue with the project. Karen Weisman has informed us that Landau Associates do not wish to discuss this directly with us until the matter has been clarified by the City of Edmonds. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL March 7, 1990 Kevin Hanchett Page 3 We trust that this provides sufficient information for your needs. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, -> CASCADE OTECHNICA;#s'�; o e Lam - E • , ,c .,� mc0 . Principal Engineerf��sit, Pet-"ewett F,n - eering Geologist PJ:pg cc: Lawrence Yuan Associates; Attn: Larry Yuan Weisman Design Group; Attri: Karen. -Weisman City of Edmonds; Attn: Dick Muma q I a CASCADE GEACHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHNGTON 98034 (206)821-5080 : 'FAX: (206) 823-22.03 FEB I�ei>$*an Design Group 2329 19ast Madison Seitt.16', Washington 98112 tt #tion: Karen .Weisman Rid areticie: Harbor Hills Lot 3 Edmonds, Washington XAren: Atb;your reqkiest, we have reviewed the plans you provided in ap . "ir.di'�nce with the plan review requirements of the 14 Mea(?oiAl�ei'l e t.*Omk of the City of Edmonds. Thi letter summariz Four, We Vie'wed'the architectural plans prepared,by 'the Weisman 9 11 Gr undated. The plans .-showed wood r6ed 41P a two story, koilldeb'6e with an attached. garage. A'crawl space will be uded'f'o'k'' t14-'k ullding with a slab: -on -grade floor for the garage.. A finished elevation for the lower floor of 146.51 'is shown' ith-,-& f:kl. ed slab elevation of 1481 on the garage floor. - T4epbuilding will utilize. a spread footing foundation pla�.ed -on hik ve'.`soil. it appears f�om the elevations shown on the site ` n pr Ar�,d by Lovell-Sa M . uerland, dated 9/29/89 and the pkb!(�d blill-41 bg elevations, that .the foundatio' and garage slab will be s c is p I I A e j4'6n­'uts into the native soil., No fill material r000ggd r.'"Re'Construct ion.. cj.. j*In details were shown- on the-, plans we reviewed,'-, j.'We nd from om conversations with the architect,. Karen WO.qihan' t `j 6bting drains will b6.placed at the base of all footin't1sl- 'ag in our soils report.' .-Footing drams will be tightlfnea . in t di. 1-.4torm system .separately from the roof drain tightline6.- j 166 s y§tem inlet is sho4in on the prepared by Lev 11­6 .* e site plan prep L6 'rid dated 9/24/89. �e do not feel that.flexible-connebA 6n'§ 6�4 4ired on this site.' 5, 1990 J;?b� 8510-08G CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL >aelt►r_aXy 1, 1990 Job; 1h;' 8910-08G ; We n Design Group ag' NQ'plprUotural notes or specifications were available on thd-pl<ihs we:.xvviewed. We understand from conversations with.the architect, 9, 1k 6 Weisman, that 2600 sf was used for the foundation Noy. 3 raanent erosion protection plan was shown on the p1abs"wa rbu �aed. As noted in our soils report for this si X` nded 'that the exposed soils below the existing _rocki-fy on th t side of the site be protected with a permanent erosion p etion. We should review the proposed erosion protection plan pr. to construction. ` s We.;.*derstand that the driveway, utilities and subsurface drainage wi placed in. accordance with the recommendations provided 'In ' 6g1Cj fetter dated October 30, 1989. The ' driveway, utiliti(3s.,' and si i�rface drainage will be placed prior to beginning .the canot.tUction for the residence. WL--)- tye reviewed the Environmental Checklist prepared by. ei.sl an Dew n:. Group for the above site. The aspects of the chICk7idt re-1pting to Soils have been addressed in the soils reports prepared font tieentireplat and for this lot. . . ` '► , ;.� i k We' �r7�c�mmend .that' we be engaged to provide construction moniotng to' 00firm that' the present slope stability is not adversely affileeted and to verify suitable construction and soil conditfotd . we_htould be engaged to be present during the constructionof the drAp*4ay, utility and subsurface drainage placement to bro-V le <. i irate recommendations' during construction. We shobi.ci be to observe the placement of erosion protection on th .-s,l.ope ea wf the proposed houde. once construction begins, we;.4hould cc firm bearing soils ire all foundation excavations prior ; to ' ing footing forms and inspect the placement of the fouAd.ati'dn cir$ie If wet weather is encountered during the excavat on f(Jr the:fo$u.ndation, we should be contacted immediately to iravide al#;wfiate and specific recommendations for wet condit.16n cUiiaitiuction. iHarbor Hills developTqent. has not been mapped -in a per6ent:age q.k-'A,isk for landslide hazard, as has the Meadowdale Area. t is O%it.:,ppinion that there is little risk of landslide hazard Lq�t .3 .' how that corrective measures have been taken, and a.�'Adnmfng ti�elt Our recommendations continue to be followed in the aria: $t totQ'U opinion that stating the percentage of risk of la dsJide ha$ is not applicable to this site. judgment that that the plans and specifications conform;the r ipndat ions in the soils/geotechnical report prepared or the 40#40-.Hills development and for this lot. The risk of da aqq ,to c¢;oposed development, or to adjacent- properties, from soi' 1 i , f i �; CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL fi� cuat y 1, 1990 ;4 1. v 'lob Flo. 8910--08G � 46A0#aii Design Group :> paw inability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set,fc•Yth h1,04i reports. The _proposed development 'will not incredglo" the tial for -soil movement if -our recommendations are fol awpd'. tI;u8 that this provides sufficient information for your 'rie2ds. ". Shiaid;you hAve any additional questions, feel free to contact us' �t1y time, $ + �• `�• ' � "s' •• a �,,-::': h `11"cr . • C,Aib GTECHNIC ,.• a SE• i�,p, j. K. P.ku iPal Engineer ���S.siU�F���t`'• P ett ing Geologist � t. id I Property -of: CITY Oi-0,EDff&NDS-='MONDS i - N° 6'304 �NE ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSOINFORMATION SHEET ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. 0 5-0 00 (a0 '?, (1-70 DESCRIPTION q_ �C SERIAL NO. LOCATION ' � \� � DEPT. NO. li * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST * PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 1(_ COST �4-/4 Iq0 B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. 41II - V 0O ~ d H - dI:lyS = oa �3 ESTIMATED LIFErr INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE b P INITIAL VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. DATE DEPARTMENT FILE to , • • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 821-5080 FAX: (206) 823-2203 '^ October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett 8516 231st S.W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Reference: Harbor Hills, Lot 3 Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Hanchett: z As discussed in our previous letter dated October 5, 1989, this letter provides details for the French drain and reinforced earth ' 'fill for the above.referenced property. French Drain i We recommend that the French drain extend the length of the pro- perty at the toe of the slope on the east side of the site. The drainage trench should be kept away from the slope .at least ten (10) feet if possible. The drain should consist of a six (6) inch diameter, rigid perforated pipe bedded and backfilled in pea. gra- vel. The trench should be at least three (3) feet deep. A sketch showing the proposed drain location with a drain detail is enclosed with this letter. It appears that the drain may be located under the paved portion of the driveway.. The pavement section should include crushed surfac- I ing that is independent of the drain rock. A minimum of twenty- four (24) inches of. cover should be maintained over the French drain. The perforated drainline should be directed to a tightline which outlets within the existing stream channel on the north side of the property. The tightline should, consist of a rigid pipe. !. Apparently it will be located beneath the driveway. The outlet of • CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett Page 2 the pipe on the north side of the drive should be suitably pro- tected from erosion with rock. Reinforced Earthfill It spears that fill will be necessary for the driveway. The area to be filled is underlain by from two -(2) to four (4) feet of peat. The open stream channel will cross the driveway in this area in a ductile pipe. There is a firm base of quarry spalls adjacent to the cul-de-sac, as shown on the site plan. It appears that steep sides will be required on the fill due to the limitation of the easement. To provide a suitable fill for the driveway, we recommend constructing a Reinforced Earthfill. We recommend that the organic soils be removed and a filter fabric be placed on a firm unyielding base. Fill should be placed on the geotextile fabric on the center and worked outward to force additional muck out from beneath the fabric. The initial lift should be two (2) feet thick, all others one (1) foot thick Two ( 2 ) feet of fill should be placed in between layers of geotextile- fabric. -In addition, the first lift .on geotextile fabric should be shouldered to the required two (2) foot thickness at the edge. The fabric flaps folded over: as shown in the ' enclosed detail -and the second lift placed. All lifts should .be compacted to 90% of the ASTM D-1557 density. It. maybe necessary to temporarily remove the ductile pipe while placing the fill. Th pipe may be placed within the reinforced earth fill with compacted fill below,the pipe elevation to maintain the existing stream elevation. CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL October 30, 1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett Page 3 We recommend the fill should be selected to meet the following. specifications: Sieve Size Percent Passing 4 inch 100 #4 25 - 75 #200 5.0 maximum. Based on the fraction pass- ing the #4 sieve. The geotextile fabric should conform to the following specifica- tions. Geotextile Fabric Properties and Test Method) Min. Requirements Grab strength minimum (lbs) 130 (ASTM'D-,1682, Method.16) I! Puncture strength (lbs) 40 (ASTM D-751, modified) i 1 ' Burst Strength (p.s.i.) 210 (ASTM D-3786, Mullen burst) Trap Tear (lbs) 40 (ASTMD-1117) In addition, upon completion of the fill any exposed geotechnical fabric should be covered or coated to protect against sunlight. Paving of the'fill area should be performed only after completion of all other construction.to allow settlement. of the fill prior to paving, to reduce possible damage.of the pavement. • October 30,.1989 Job No. 8910-8G Mike Hanchett: Page 4 _ General CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL We should be retained to monitor field work for both. the French drain and reinforced earth fill. We expect the on -site conditions to reflect our findings;, however, variations may occur. Should soil conditions be. encountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, we. should be con- tacted immediately to determine if additional or alternate: recom- mendations are required. This report has been prepared for the. exclusive use of Mike Hanchett for specific application .to lot .3 of the Harbor Hills development in accordance. with generally accepted -soils and founda- tion engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Thank you for this opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have any questions, feel free to.contact us at any t ime . Sincerely, CASCAD GEOTECHNI �i Ge rge E. Pamb,l Principal Enginee PJ:lal cc: 'Lovell-Sauerland;'Attn:'Bob Jones ij Karen Wiesman Architects Enclosures Pet Jewett 54�6ineering Geologist PEA GRAB 6" 0 RIGID PERFORATED F Harbor Hills -Lot 3 FRENCHDRAIN.DETAIL �18" MIN- Job Na SCALE :NOT TO SCALE CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL 8910-8G A DIVISION Of CASCADE TESTING WBORATORY, INC. LOCATIONS: ARE APPROXIMATE 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE _ KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 pa►� Own. By IE=ol KIRKLAND: (206) 821-5080 SEATTLE: (206) 525-6700 10/27/89 HLA WZff III 7dV4' 1I ll //' ITY OF EDM S 'USE PERMIT �i /�[ ' _�N B �i� rr. CONS TION PERMIT APPLICATION I .i - { �Jt.lo�®�._ OWNERNA N E OF BUSINESS B SUITE/APT ADDRESSF///�,A 19e D w MAILING ADD O / ^// � � �./ /'� �"� ' � � �l7 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STfiEET MAP. TESCP r ZI TELEPHONEAPPROVED CITY NUMBER BY / EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION �__ _ NAME PROPOSED Z RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED O w w ADDRESS , STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED O z U Cr Z C' i� ' n�(�"i/1.. I I r i� CITY ZIP T Z w REVIEW BY SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED LEPHONE NUMBERj�J�i REMARKS NAME 7 / j.� CUl07� o,( y lid - y/%%!� ; ADDRESS ,?? FNAL 4'1V6/NPc°,U,-16 0 V.. �- "2 . I Z / W A/ C{I�TYCJ[,.J',f� ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE / FIXTURE UNITS Z O , "l..l--('y/"V+F:�.C- /: -Z w a REMARKS O STATE LICENSE NUMBER' n I/ / 1 Y } Go uIYr-CA,. / SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB No. Legal Description of Property - include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT ` --- ^----- _. Z (show below or attach two copies) a I VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE J a O SETBACKS - FEET FRONT !SIDE C= p REAR rr � HEIGHT f�/ LOT COVf.RAGLt J l• D ? Z J Tax Account Parcel No. 7�l��-'t'i!i�—003-COO `� �+ REMARKS CDN4"&gS &MAX ''y��� NEW rrIIR RESIDENTIAL , PLUMBING 2F�v�"cyals ADDIALTER COMMERCIAL ��� tfe,0 , P MECHANICAL F1It APT. �P9rrYr/ petit/ LO1-.� /hrlS� 4e l?�9°',i9r� o / /tail. REPAIR SIGN}/ /r EXCAVATE, FILL FENCE CHECKEQ BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT DEMEl OLISH OR GRADE ( x._FT) � CARPORT,,,,,,, SWIM REMODEL GARAGE" 1:1POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT WOOD STOVEI RETAINING WALL/ ;'INSERT 17 RENEWAL REQUIRED YES L' NO REMARKS OCCUPANCY 3 LOAD 0 ROCKERY (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 3O5 O N NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF e,el#& 51ff iE4IM1 4 fh 6 Y O 0 G UNITSLING-- NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) .) EA wip, w1n,I �00Dr 4C F-� -'__ C FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE _ S3 BUILDING_ p ,5- o "- 6MOkYh /0 YD-5 PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL - y This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year- Provided Worl{ is Started Within 180 Days - "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and n successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, aemployees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of i whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ° modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance II ° nor limit in any way the City's ability '.o enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Oe `Zd17 '':Z provision. 23 I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION, APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is INSPECTION acknowledged in space provjbed. =SIGNArYRER OFI AG NT) DATE SIGNE9D DEPARTMENT / a""y' ' OFFICML' $ E DATE �, N��.X�,j) CITY D ATTENTION CALL FOR RELEASE Y: DATE INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 771-3202 UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANC' '�S BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD -- Assessor 102.87 Harbor Hills Lod 3 Wcation Map : 260--' 255-` 250-� 245 tu Lu REINFORCED EARTH FILL QUARRY SPALLS STEEL CULVERT DALEY PLACE (CUL DE SAC) 0 261i �255 D y / APPROX. HOUSE / LOCATION EXISTING CONTOUR �CLob ED 1, APPROX. GARAGE LOCATION \ FROM DRIVEWAY PLAN BY LOVELL-SAUERLAND & ASSOCIATES, INC. 51 s .. C ; .,; f . , - ""��, :: �"� ;'`j' - as,.,'. ..,T 1 v'J4�a.F'* It- t y�. t4- r'''-;� A'*;�„' r':,r->t,,��c'F' -�. � �k"r.' uT' 14 i { ' r''•i ;� � �' '- u` tt' - '.t , :�rtf. ,x J f'.,t,t. ti•,�.. r ',71. {iJat. t.t ?��' ;S;9t�.Jt1U,d/J4:1' •,t'� ;Ih ' � Y , ,._ . - ` J::3 •' i ,� .�'}� ! .:'t 1 ,lf1 ' f}+'� i z� ,t f tni ' 4 S `,' )Ut t .r Y^1j" J•��'�•!\r- �y"•'11••"'y�-r v-v �• l—y-N'.l�5/�.✓v�• `� /� - .. _nI , „ "- } , r �{� :. tJ `W `F ; r' t �� ��,. � �rx��„�_n.-�.�..J,��,+�,,,�_.r�.n..1���1....n.,�..JC..�/L..\��..l..r`•—+L �G.�7 � •'l,l'! �, 'f i' '' � ,�y yr� y-�dJr�.1 �. 'Pu I _--------------------------- I ca._ lgtrjTN. sTREET sw,. /-- 260 ✓ u1 „ / C { � �+� '�] � �} tM1 ', � � • ' �.. " ' lA'17p O CAS .7. 1. �• r t 1r+11 , `r ,(' ,�� uj "JOSITE �*••�._i_�_.I�_.1..-S••' _ --�—�' -T� f- WA �, �.--.r/ KJ"1 �• r' .! .5r` � 4 ' 1++'J 1 � .. �� ,;� IJI 1Eyk%G Q Eh/ 4?oc W's • / m cL -< ' ; , �/ - ✓�II.."y' .F"r...G R../ L0-�7 ar t , I F }• r �rp �"' 3 �K • vo ;TY :MA �,_ Y ' ►` t : .. .. , � .. i} �e' �,,i if � f•: ,i .i. 1 r !' ,ir'. - ,I •�T"', ,,t FY {•,,. .4j A `. ap, t..r Y S.'K -K.-" [i;t" r .,15:, ht'7 •. S'.a,.} S s i' 'i•�11 tw''�t '1 Iii ,f 4''. 0 t ,'1 t ,'�r'�s,r.j, ;-},i li };j 1^ #e• !� �" ,,:, i'II �' : „1 , .t.c 1� _ it_.+ _ u� t' O1�Viltty tl�y-Yt1.71� 4, } 41r r'�:, ; 1 • ri f . t1i. r!. i •',{ Divisldn, G,c efal Vie' S r \ P n gtiiiremetit�l 4r j >t: jL f: t.a w. 9' e t l t 6 � I ' • t , {t'Qi;'.1 Q' i -a,lf_ ,::+ �, ;,4, {; J, T i .�' Y11IgkG' GlaiViAW 60 1tegtila R'• �j :010ator jr It qutrehte3 j�.y , :, �.. , + , ..fe 4 [ ,"..'` . v - '- ., ,.: ` : �vi8 :> !.1 ►•e4: ite. fimll - 1� '1..4", [:7,{ x a4.�o t _ } ' 1 :J•yyl:( {r ,.6 •:yl,.yt p J11 �1`"'i5 .rjl 4 ��t'� j��y yj,�11 A �vbrl.com►llfttd:ir �j�{yp, �.jjyp}?;e y�j jfsS.r�',vy.,j+y]{,.� j�,IdGtilG ll♦l r}��{1nGlhdiffil �LLL I; at Lin 1ti bitu �yay:I33 ,,�� 'S:I'p�i. >1, fiins � iil:fi rd�it�icalt l�viecl�aniel l;ner'y end < , ? , :.''4 �'.,;� , p 4 , .: >. _ t i ot t Coti�oed>�n#e.„trl�'ii s ngleeil Zon�� Codes, s t 4xr ]j yy y� �r�yd�.; e 1, t !• .t J ,i } r'A ' •�l hl l Vb.7el A /� V {� P rA•rgAr! 1''a6. 1. Ct�4�: tFt`! Arr i'�t+t' zq". •«;, i :f' Ii. r-�!.',-•4v;i! .iF, kCC theq ler �1, r,, !', .,i.0 i 644,' ,y, ,i �...i•A . No prin,16 rotttiiclor ! ,. }tnfor d; the „ p't$the commence: tvrl�iuid� dhtk eottra+ct a, r >4" J Until h 3. all" , y :tlioi' ` #ii • itl, �ndeavt#'k, i 2haa oitatned,.�►11tiurence.i,lry.���{t{ ,y r re aired, r „ '! T ..J' I J ;" thG �u��Ci.':!! L:llli7l dC�� r�[l�tK �h heouer anti,h L C ss. c,4 ° �}' ' S!'{iyQy� L s i a, , c` 't 0defic ' 1 �in;tllG::iVIA.''v` 0 iti§urance ,fins.: beets. a roved ' i ; �` 4: �4:• s ,: a > ,, ;,� .�:,`,4,. � d'p by +cl ,, J. ^ ,'r°,, Zx�S .,' l; �..�..;1;:? t� 3 r. �• _.� r', i, t( �' . a. t+.i.. - ' ,�• t},. " F J 1 t . zz��:r ,,'4,.',,yy•. 1 � 1r � 1. , ' 'S Y, ,r'. 'fat �) iY 1'i"Y, r4;1,ry:' l -.ipk• # it.1 i r 1 Own , itci•••l, s.611 the' conrt3ractox tg tyy. �� 1y��;. ` f 4 .-C•'tqq tf'; i- ;'t, �St ?j zp4jjle` itCl.tf�. il1,h6t., Cvf'>ti' Iraf allow an : subcdntraCtOr too l r , / j k5 3 K.,a; i y Y4�rf 1 , •'• t { i a wd �, ap Y,:•' .. r; des it�1! ''fCt r+r�ii§trttttot4 means If: ��,, 11 .coifimi nt .wtii' �.ori this Ibcot tract ,,��(a,�j , cy l% •a �i . :J E,, 'jt:' i ,r`?j IrkP, #4. . I,, ,t `, t,1 J ,`:i. , <4':4.h. , 4 �,jineth+s�'��trti ite�eit1e ©r 1�5�7�} � i :�i id! all §6fiar, �nsu ttce re iilred, .r :. ,Liu r,,a '� 4 k, r1•:�(i'�ro' ,w ,ul �'ti�Jfoit,gafriutions °df the sfibcon rat r tias been so ,a•;; I S d4 yN t ,1 rys., ��{{ yt �yY : 4i. -4 - , 'tf t, Lro' ' _ ! ! 1 , ; '<, And Mtn$• til••. ECt 1 ►•ith' obtained ertd:al�"/,bro °4 - i-, r ',:rlkRi`. �c r , �i 1 itiJ' l }J'. a S �� ,j�fr-.�`{ �y y'� yy ' \•,• \ _i ,I,,!, a Y... J,r{ `1•.#.I 'r.,}n t l}a' Y i�+ , i'. s?, ' 4: t s. .t a T�'Vi,+�T'Rlld he h '' '!'r t,, .r?j..�+C ! '! ° ,�.',} �'k'7Kr t, '' ., '• `�. K., \ ,Y,P "f,..'Yf '•+� .1 �,. .k�' � ��. �#f., , Dt} .�; :,.a 4, ti - J ,�, ;stf�' E,•..af�"+'Ft � i+ •,1. � .�rt'., y,,, i. • 1 °r t ty it r; e t -4 1' {1 i � rerspP La, Vl •Qn vf olllrO ..,�,? {, �`�' I! The Contractof' gha11•tale tit at16 }. � , ..:,). .u.1 0-yr .4. ,✓,•, i , °` 3�•=' •� ':��� ; t`,` , i + t fatlufrfi►aicr oi�t the 1 1r��E t Yti+i i. nlaintaira .darn` the 11e b l`hta !a ,JI f �•,,:J :a 3 .K ,. i' r% i'' }ski kl J/ ,.. 1 .' ' actor r��';W th tho-rCott"�'��`o, ,t ��,�� \� cd2 tmct t � ut`o t�{) j �� !. '! I d it } � - .,� t,\. ry: rtV �er r'- - ` S�L •ill JI!8,:?t., •,•.' '.r'r fY:� }i T 44 -+'j T . et W �'1'ite Ai~clttt � vull! >�tbt' , , r - Compensation ;mod; pmplo`; fr + ?. ` , ,' �, ��� �e r i+r the a� •�tT.t �:j 7. .1,• .$-'jj'f,> .)'f ,t f_ 4 A'f�f LiiWl uralice foi�'a11: df hi 7' i��♦ +=j'� .R i:: �:4 :. ,'},rr IS. A, 'i .j.,! - ', 1. s'.:r' i•. ., i' :A ,� :4 .^ t•':y: ,{ t aT.:7: �1111,V%7 Vl-�i1 •Niltr614i, ',Cln 3 e p o�yees Wo a engaged work'. r f. �t,, .. E t 4A f•, t,ubtr L�tE�1t3 0><i S under thiscontraet and do case`s" ch.' ;,; ,,t� �.JF(,�,'j,t�, i�ry y�yy. yyy ��{.rr�y �r S, n i 1i t 'r v tkti •` 1 t f ^'f Y �- gefil :C. , 1V CCD� of 'pIl ,:)Vthel work is subfefj the ContraeEor:hll �' �• ? :r .: �i..t.._,. Y .f,,.: "•t. !,,.,;, L ► s�ubcon ra ' 't' i dfin n dh 3 i I w..require td'1 ., t cto inllarlytit y,+f �y jy QjF ij �j rye K //�� ' rovi a �sW iiisurani� t,Jr`Elio,'or ? , * 1''TT 4r S ,�� y{} yRy t , i tr. ' ` y• .1 + ! ' . -. __ _.. ; •4 A .!� %, ,5 K .tt„' 'I! , `,, , '34 :,,.. ,# .. .. xC �. ..il• '!y,l t v: '.6 IY r:�. �.entplo�ree.+ea:u'` ed .. �,_ f,, �.k t• y�, ._. '-L� y,� y♦, �� '�...L-t.>. j.` � ;�',�Y w' 'rV a. > r, J>.. t { +?tl f �/, h���?'•Ci . 'tht.`S CCirlh'.a�ct. W► not�,p('rVC4.ted. s'1• :! 'i'.. it,�fi• S. ;:4 a. r,41 , f. l.• _ �"•.,:-1 t;�^¢y tinder th°�VdrfCer§''C01 t t i z o 1pensatton Statute,'tle Contractor:3�1'iMob t r 4 8 i2 d�.>t.. ��r1y " rf� 1. 4r ?la J � � ' '�;��`7 4L, `L4t� ry i� 4,, .;� {',.. •. V 4.. riir't 7�:'' ,, r, 1ro� qy} � t,d t'� �' �� �"'� :t?? Il'• provideIIC� Rise G4'' Y a� y{ !;K:y , `., �.Y '` KS :. •I� i ik : „ 7";,i, t i, :, p,4 k t' ? -v,�; a i �, It`rt Ili;! GW� ,yb t4& li subcbntracfot_-. o roved+ x" e �g `l .�+ j.� A fi J r ;.' Com'.;ensddon.lt siirariG�'11+1/i {4 t y� LWVI.L (!ir� j— 1'' 6.✓ t1"1 e Rrt r i 4k� ,4' k ,,G4 Yif�r �? 1 private corn i N V . i91 hilt 4 ' y ' i '} , . J L., E'y L .. r��•(\j��,/�(/ i` V I � '��yy�,,,j �- •R` �{•, {/ 1 r b ,','. i tie "l. Y..i; :1' �1� S� +•. I . ecutvafettr"tb 4fit pro41 ed by the NA ►,T1441 Statute Or ptotecti oft, bi hiil� einploy.66, tiot bther #1 ' @ protected.'' P2F•v2 e01070 rge!WALL, ! `���1 ,y'a �f�,"".. r. 111��'1FG ,':. I�t :lG•f�'IT(�F•+l-•'.G.✓ �, t �-+, ' ,_.t,! yyr111i , tit ,' ,4 .kk -7 ! WALL, SEC,-r I CWo,6 1_)5YAI I.ev -antractdrg 1t 11 Field t ck � 8 1 ! I l..b I N G 1 i � 1 �► !; ' ' dim tl'ertf Yf :� . ' ension ain c#catloft of ' i y f r: 4� { rk NIN ,j the work', i"the A"i' m ect. .The � �K � „ 2. ' p t 1 , 1- fi ure S o2is o1`r notes r, [ •:'}i ip } fa " idle1" �• , at#rig,drinensionsbe used : '},1r'ti rr'` {: lnsteacl of tne>�i�reme ts. of C ( �` iE r� f syy+p �r g s. dra �� / 3 .`� • t,:' 1 r i .01 l f 1 ,itta 9 e' 1 wingp • 1 r�cale and s1t.:fe +; x C 1' t 4 b",, Y , ,j {. t i,- '.. i, /,?1.,j•4._'; i ;y',1.�,�giarig"� 'aiy ,3: . ,7'' *, -. ,1. ''"�1 k.l" µ•4- .4a: C , 'A T ,Y rdf'i n? '�riIl w�•t, 1�1! ;tk:: !' �, '�,N.., ,.,', t, yi 1 'j tar Or ,Com lied: t i ,Y - P fAttth. d>t� I� �tC C,r', :.s•. .;t '. -: r,' Ca1e' i �4� t,o> E'f,: ` +�„p � `.I ' ;memuretihd ts:s�half tis i' 4z . ' , ra Ahj� tbtriittal9 regtili� d' 0 Cit r 6d ds a 1- i.l•; ,,'�'l• • 1 t' ki )+' 1 /'� :i -,i , . ! .4' , , y , r clirYteisioirt'to rtioikgh�tli . �tirittshed'iit�iCie1 ..1 i'. �,,5 II` J, 1..Yti ltA4,� `I .,y. •l far}]�a spade tltawin s riotJ t ,am t;,the, Contrsit�tnP�4! f1 :'; rt,�! ra tr :: g .i',fKiY,i F+,34i } Y, .`! It > ,r t tE''1'., E��,j�A,�d/�, .ill��.1►v�el.ulJila ''iC VT. tit dt ' eri$loned. f �r eiF 4 / .t i r , ;, 4!.•}:, �• } 4: ,�. r „� i r ,�. ••'gip yj ,y� vtr��:•t yrt;�x.. Y 'R '•_!' :, t:••.`!'� at. tyy} ;!.1 r.;;: ■0�1E'1�ly�•i'r��,)y�I. l,, .r'#.,r' 'l• :1 y { tr S.r•: 'd } 1 .�''� t. ..y l� .I . �'_i'tI'' 1{� ,1 i �, 1�4' \'Mr .H t'i :,^ .+?' rfl � ( �(y 1,'r� r i. .C4, ••i:•,r 'A�t:f.'�r9: Edr4;:5.'6'1 ,y,;,; 4A r,a`A,1' Brut:-r 1,Gr:'tF4, Vigures on a11'dtawin s .A well.as 7 �; y 1='© �7 I �y o !� G7 t.Lt�5 oob a 1(ih { 4} IN'1 T ( ��ry y�' U f. �:'r, t �1� i �. - the delai� . draw#n? , �-o r�.iT fj rz l..lJT ..�, therriselVes ere :, , ; R }" € 7j ri, i �T� , r' C7 r Y r t 1 (.., V. �" ii�'• 4,Y .f _ � subjee�.irt Ever ,rase 1fd •� -i ,1•,-' ,.. . N T�-1'II�ia.1tiII�G�4. 5 GNN G IG7 �,;t r-; �y �: t:: i •:� ,.'��� �lo �1,�� � I l i 343 a.�F�l°•../�Gi� I P 4�NiJE b tnea5urenient ' Gt2.ab UN ale. TAe+i�.-1�1� I,if acl scent or..,i, ( r: x K exist#ng ;world J, " y! ` i C7 . i-�ta.� 17 I Art. t E. tM'��� a' •a4 .t j��:l .;4' :•s. .)' ,� ,. 8ufeittent�l,necessa d6 4o. efore �ndertaklitig ..401.1.s iwork T ;, °„n � - 1. 'r � '�� ,,: , ,ir l'C� aJ; Tpp'i� , '4.k 1,,� h }'( P .•t;' ! ')d'e^� a.n,,1� L ri. ,rosy".�.. J..,�. :,F ', T^c'. ., .n, .� , i• L ll. 1:C.Y I q 2 � g i 22-j A `1 � 8 7 de endent .t� bi such 1V tlf ` I E ., �a, :� 4A: t,f ti � •: , ".�. I , ! p p date ; o �. :Architect whenever ditnen . I.VAIT i aN� �a N� G+41'. sNdwl:l lion y dl�.H •1. ' ,i I�,.x t,t,, lrY `' 1 •�� I -i� ♦ f rye.. 4• �t't scre'• afvcies. �' :r�l< ;q� ; , y■ z � 1 :' i : `4• , ' y 1j," • n: :r� 'n' , .--r' a i.- •'! 't' i C'ti• 1•.'�: tf +w'-Y, Alt r .1 .J :� i' `i . �n =-x�a , .4. �!f � , i-' : � i r �'� t' d !C' ai: "r't ; .? i . fit'! 7 ., •,i� . ,.j. ,.5 C. , h.. +i ,.�,:' �' � tli' •h,,.:. {Irk: 1 �t." ':�.,ti, c ,. .� '.I i ..1 `t'qi•• �4' .•4; \` ; :k}J r'h` ,:o(F• :��i i :��'k F�1.t�,V,. •, Yy,y• i. i:�- r 4' J�&`j `E',S , ,, „ti ,:i t �. ;K„ .w ,', G- .t/A.Z HO r_,A,t.cUL I oN� 1 t As �.. �. 1.r..;� �,, � � i�T K' 3 :3n T.TA,;1l.�:� ti llr:r 1:',ti .i t:: „i'•. t ,i Ail'ft� ,. .r< Yi i�IF v+}i4' V i:Y•r '{" vh. ,'1, r r , i,SS' ,, •r • �.}� � � } �i.ti �Y} ,*�{,.; �., , �,, ..1 ,J. �,'• „}� „Y' Y,±. IY. !! � .4 i�� 1 . � fir; � Eb � �- .J•�v,'.ii.' {Lott! t, i• ��,. !>, 1� y+ may. yy,,�r yqJ cc I"' .(' .E is al(�,y. i}. t t 'C t r r' r. 1. .4 1 - h ; S ` ,'r ° � `� ,r. `7` �''St' � .iM�`,'f,� h,Y� . 'Si i• �• eJ' �ti� Sf1 4 , �'!" A �„ „,{. t"„' ', y. tr. •►.r- i•r ._ I s r' -+i . t' , f r. w d . 5.' 1 ?I'• a. rol �•y !�lAj� l'�,�: } t�� y, 4: . �.t-'., i } f 'h `"L d.r,• Y Cay ,w p•'. �' , tj3,;> plti �+„� �t:' jj''w 1: S: ,: `4" 'r '•t ., }'rt„ ''1' 't-, r. I'!-+i x . `v `i 'i,,ll.� {. O �•: {. <<. a '' � ✓1 • �gy t - ! 9 it"3�r� {. nr„ '''!" .f. l t�,. hM1 ,►' .j': -'r' b , .aa �,x�Yt si. .f�•,'Y,U 1 �.'((•.i �,% 1Y,,ft gg ;Yis �. ,1 .t .A y �"• T��':6; L• 1� 'Cl- iR�•' "`i7nM' �.[pi, ., �. i ir. ;.lj', ly. �. y. f,,,,. Vr ; a `.S.• i '� SFrS' fi t, .'. ...':�t; :>,,. _ 3`, {, .? �`. dI a'�l •1.€ r � � .. s_;.t t,` a� �� �:� �, -: L t a ,r [k 'ri, !'Y:'#.. �:,'. OZ7,00 :.Se�vera e'.and ,; � ,. � ,�,,.. , �11,41 ., w.,:� a. � ' •Y < � • � � �� �:t.'= ' :� f+!M,7. .r - �r lrrlr"'K•. •+►+Ftl �•e-, r,. + i j.. '$. , �''`. @ � •� A'i'`. TI!.P/ sr � I,•f!i!. � I � 1" : V�� � r �. �: r1-�'' ++ , u,• ' b tJ., i' yri .1 �: .f a: ! Yr"ik ,F . ,t.'� �;4f •' irr. a . ., •t,� is x. 'it". , le,. • # �'..,.,1 ,r , 14 r1 : i�.:. •:i% i 1: •4: t • q Tie tv:,eicistin d"rain•` e,'�d'�e•►♦A �..:�, ,�� , ,i ,. t K _ r.i , �. �pd ��5. it .,��'�'.. � . ;,< , ,;' ;< r.�j� ,■S ,, WGf.• '',�,3r:. � t �r�� {� 'r +t� .1 �' •`' . i'. Y"�4:, � ���.3 .? V. !t.'` �ILS, .,\}• - ,. .. � , .. y: ;, ..y .� �� , a lip.. lr`. < 1. X'g.a b A i •'�.{ .1. 1.;;',' tli�,'•�tstiliit Stb a ~r :,, !.•:..� a ,� , '.! .•„ `. t k, Fria . : t,. [ 1 J • t '- ? ny,.•, 3t J i v • L •� � A' .c y /!� a A tit ..r �.�'> . d r ,l' a ' .} �E x: .a t'� � � .I�'%1 f,,E i' • `�' p: �e'� LLlc I�itC • �' ` �'.: � . L :'r;' ;fr d , h,J�,' f' ,{t'4: � ., f , , ' 'i'�: 4., r, � , �} ,; .•�w.7�' �' , ?, � 't�; t..�`' , , 7} j'. ,u4 � g x 1^i <i . .�'� ;, , ��� ��.�t`+F':. ka'. i 'i'rQe((• �.i'ii7 a:'-:. �.li '1` �`",y, 'F•:'1. ;�r >� .,,"L:. v.' j ,r 1 ►:$::" ar '� rri .�+ ii4'?. "-ti,,r:. .�. � u. �'. .ra• J. :! tG yl r't-i !f • w :,�.��. ,�?:i .y, t;':'F'll....i,r,.. ry� .S 4•>.•w.. r:,:,� 11 � •1+rfrt :�� ��, ,d.'. r�r4 1 KL� t ��,L��Git �1'.t,k �v ,r�A� �i,� yw ,"�" +,: .,A:•� 'i `r: ;.J?.' /��4YFid�•t�11�,�I ,v. .. '4 '' i-nt .!R"� � }' � +�F,r °, . .: d.' . I� jii , rt ..: J� '•+ i:��. � ! TS,. 7, . . '�? � f " ♦•' Yi ,'s,...,_ A a„+' f.� 15:•! �.�.}L.. ,.� i-' r,1 �' f •.a ,�,:� f ,•,.1 " `.+-+t' ,. C � •,.. 4' S dl�, 'b f-,q .a, 'k.i,` ,,++ i .}.'��Si 'r'� f •C. �, ,yr: 'I't: 4:: , f.'�I�1'�4 kl } n p; ,t �. �. _ , _ ,'i'�- � r.� , J�1" {kl �1 � x F l%A t?l,. ..,, ,' �� y '•• • .•� 1; p . ,, •r, .� - y r;• �y^,, •n 4 .. l �A' td ,ff yi'i � - � '• ,-�: �?,#t4 � ��l Y!f .0 ' „tf .1• tw,F lT_ t at. Cr A° ✓ �iY .iy _ � .. f $, -, .i..., !. ''•r.y d1,`}',' y�i .' 3- i �-i '.y � y - }� -1•' '�f�..�l�t �' d ! ,i xp,., 4.'. i; � ,d! .,; r�` , ,y V .a J f )r�ri it sty" 'r r 4.h - � - 'r'. �.1-- s',Jir f� r.'i:, fj}}r�.}„ "rr�44 ,,i� ,i' f., .�'�. ,,�1 a a' •t� ,., ,•y S7f' ' �p` � � , � i ; ( (( ' ,' . r �. # .4 Sa° , •. t,}'t J • ., •. ( h' 'ri, f '�,4 .. - ,` ,,'. ; ''a t .r y`{{:ii°` rr .,t:i ,�,., �i a � � ,yy. y' rlr '. M'• ,:bf; f,. ',TJ is ,Y:' �p�ry.1yt � IT T•' f,,,�,f'�g :,,/. r".�, 1'• 'Ji , '.14 :•€1 L :O.` yJ,! J0 _ t.: 1 .,, :r ,4'}.; ..W)'} ,.r, •7- , r ':r- 1 ^ 1 i:'" i , .r.. ,i 4 r` Y,, �J •,` ,,• '!: , ',, yr, r'c' y ,, rr++ •,A t :'r ,. ; it •. :�I '.4 Sk} � •i 'i!+x,. y , E`t i 1 fmmi��i9.t-- },Y� ..�-. ;,, Yf'Yh r. ( ) ,,.• "ir ,�'' �yE�, .4 . `7.'s 0a - •.�. '., .: •1•. i.5 ,iFj r,' .4'Cir• :q , {k�� ! 1. f a:l� -'L t "• T�}/t` ,.Y. •i' �,t. .A3 1 ,': '-�. '�7: �"f•: .. i' �,•- 2'J t: 11,::: tT Ar" 1 r i ,T'. "�t'�:. `:,: •: p,-a a �� ?P 4n �4. :f. t •'t>': {, a Y V. t �' .4 r . r. W 1 k \ f r f eJ R , •.7 ` §� /. 4 g ..,. f � •1 .. f `r r J .{. • ` Sir r•;t : ,: , 1• 'f. y N ,11 • rV V' : 2 t: : �t R 1. ij •'1 1 ' tq (t( x!f ..Y -i, d ,tv '• :iv. .. � .' �• ,,, �. S'J'" 'r, .. ��,, ,•„ 5y , t".: '.i, n.. ��: 'f �YF i •:'ti"' ,� •„ ^8'S':}?. ;r ,�t ,4 .. :q - i ! - C 1 O : . t t , ' �d CJ ;. - , tFtlt 3p.," •, " i �1 ,,, • 1 . x 1 i f a, , !C" r'. •,b. "M� .l. 7 , 1 ,1 • .':: ,. '! t tF �. � �, l'•'• . i� '��,' •.'Y, 1 J9 , Y r � i?y 'ri, "r' +«.,, '✓ai i • .G 't #` 1 1. t'f , , i`?;'�_ - a . - . � : i ,,. ,... t ,.� R . ,•eY ! ,.� . .. �t ,: y,t..e...4r'sJks� J .., .. • El -":'x ��ai,. �` ,flitiia a H� ,u) %�'gW'�• • . eT�l'• � � c ¢F'i r.', .,. :� il' r:...- u ... IV7al �Z//S �r rrry9.�-aa�,y y-2•S F fIr M - ✓ ( N. r ILA fi Ic✓ 1 f .jAl ♦ ,` 1 �i /j�.y, f :. CaMsu-ri5 F;L. i 2�X -- IN r ........ .. ,.. L� Y f, r N D° 5-3 W t , I ",ls ro . '\ 1 - .. `•. - n ,;':, ©,�i('it1' V' � 0tip R��'. � v�`+�.Gree�aebaum . may.• 1 •' , Y ' "1-L��`'�` '�`'� ale �ylace - n. in' In eismic &he, 3 -- -- r _.... _ . _ , .. _ ... — — --• �xT !�rtt pyVyy� p ,�}W� /� tid v4tY.4i1' iwlff; V�'.4++ i�% I ' l'ae>' 1-711-2152 / 1 � l,G►�''�1��. Imo:, dGYv.� �, V L�C4r°� ' + Gc�ir�t'c MONO -,,� . r Lc�# # .City � . SI c " 'i�w *e� .. ". "'--.. ' ► ,! L/ l� ri� %7 % MOO . Sr i Fes: I /4 'Z4- +�i l.� art n " 1 7 {JV . 008 ;C:T htl II�r=vtcfr� 6-1 T. 2 7 1�•.t HE ' Mor - • 081 hued soace t YU►'1 I ir1T'- 14W -,i✓ MHawUMmor IN 6^4s Pr�ipciseci I95s4, #t new heated . . L'7�'1.1.•Y i .� �, *l Y• . 221.41 � 'i'H =MW il.L. Heat T Gas TH 'I't► New Glas, S .;5 ft. rkw t ,j.�IbT • ' - (■y[( ��i■y/ i01t.� r "') If 4 tTfi 1"{�1+ w✓ t 1 Vx - A' J - �^ }C}1 - �i L+a�id Rc f 15DL 25 LL. i� ODL "�V'LL - - ! M {,,., +fir /� •. 12 so IN 1 I vVnte a dee - b t e Wind L is r+ 1 BtiiT1 h V f.5 jA� (/��, \){++{}k'qi xrr ii'y �y •� V ••'fuK !'} V I •. •,- IfJ1d1V YN"t 1 �i. �✓�i3 .��• �al '©I •y /1� 6 V ' �y Rye k�' �i1tY y► �'4+ h1 T t� - I 149. —> ( tle flr.,isl'�t':� bli aspi1. 2 t111U P • f rr there. once P 2 5t1U SI 28 days 4& o .. .. 1 f�4— 1 I ? f�YE.t�'..J`G ieinf"! Cixe 40 flars Studs/Floor/Roof structure AU,CW Mp 1 A Z , ' 13 '#2 ,4.t=? UGC L.. I r r;, G. LAI t J i j' : It u .. .. 24/0 ' �t'r-�U v =� q V.� � t ��i - S �' I �32/i6 ..r , , , , hi1i « ". Pei table a2F. % FL. MVAT 1 d!-i�.� F�'©Y� HU � HTr� S�1dva�.1 bed4e ,:". %Ref: Tto sheet # , VICINITY MAP SCALE . , J`= 200 . Z0; _-T MINUMMIN SET Fr ,_ OTHER - �--•� HEIGHT A PROVED BY PLANNIN 0 'CONSULTANT POD 1451 Edmonds, Washington "020-1451 1-206-719-5751 V, 1-425-673-111311, DKCorMn@a cs,com - WReffiffis tjGy t. C...CS• �+ .""1 "CI 611t no A Meg a' o•p dt a O •M:6 -5 rTi 11 w r9Tr{ toga- _._ .....,.•<,hv.rwmxca�tr P �ia.i t„,�A� I ���k �i� sr�rss ,1xThf1►''a�o .��8 �dw���nc4"b a ��t-wwsrtr#.v.MdalttAtuik�pt+'t?7�'�M+�9Lea:�MttR+,P. k7mtis+u*a f q 16 �.�► w CD vco 1CD I Harbor Hills — Lot 3 GENERALIZED REINFORCED EARTH CROSS SECTION PAV,W. I.Ecl:c" AS PEr, DESMN 5Pc.C1F'.CATI."h U""I YT! LE I, L k, se p S :tC: jr 1 A 1 1#4 L'I 9*5% AS V DrtiK LAP WTH 21 bMreN AMWtOS r O!Vrl�f FC C-) 3. 4JOTE: W.-:AL LOMA LJ�T C) .7 -)ETAIL5 037,411UED FiCOM F' AbRIC .01 *i*'j. W";,.kc 'S -k'otAt:, 1, Ir -D A R TIY\ F/e- L -Q REPO�eT DA775D OC-7',30,1989 J046 9 3, -YP (7 0/0'�5,31,w .54, 5x. /.? /i 0 -tE: I MA I C SKD 51 WATED M kl., -,v I P—r 0 cAscAm GiarECHWAL 'to I SAO- IL 619 $CAI f MOT (Av�*JA " ttft� LAW ttw•bc I n _ _ _ / LOCA7ONS ARE APPROAVA E 4N,$44 119 -ft*f UULA01" rD UAf 10/27/ . ....... .. LA 035 ... ...... . %0 t E i 0 #/7Z- 74' JD FEB msi 11844 t R LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOr o, PLAr OF H4k'f3m HiLG3, GirY or- EOMON,OS, 6MOf/OM/5H collNr WASN/NGrON. if . JcMY Jrblo 1vv 23z.47 Jro" JrUe Try r-C r 100 ae, � (A PRIVATE ;R oA D) o DALEY PLACE (CUL DE SAC) P�OPOJE,O P. U.,CJ M, a --�� YJ v N wm a� �N 1> ^1 64J JR-16 JL YJ\jlPJC H rE IGHTIS) ;> (VDL U,`il I-� 23 PAGE 58) '1p Vo 1\1J♦ �4 -'� /O' 16.5.$•1. BENCHMARK rOP OF MONU/YMENr /N C46E LOCATW Ar CENTER OF cl14 DE sAG, OAL.EV PLACE. N.E. 4'A, SECTION 24, T:.2 7 N., R. 3 E., . W. EGE V. = Z Z9. 49 ,OA ram : C/ rV ©r- EONI DN,05 �► -r v �'�► r— r- rti s a rr^. w r. ► , .. ;► .. i w r, -r r,,. w . E�!f'Y31UJ LA =a 833 tr# --7,1W6�711volYp _yg