The URL can be used to link to this page

1115 4TH AVE S.PDF1111 lill lill 5039 1115 4TH AVE S ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): (90) Y j / uJ" 6 yj COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS :��L!' " (1V ! DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required (Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: f7N� ' �(� 'UI . �Ir✓�� YY �C�� f' " U� %I} DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED 0 ITTA Off, "01 zZly. - 7-- mzmx 11 m- PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: 5 ',35- b ✓ LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: ) D ); SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATEI 1 STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: IBI ` 96 LID #: I BLOCK: L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc 07/13/2006 20:57 5413183400 PINNACLE PAGE 01 #P20 -Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: ChA Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Lomuon. ?J%4i 2 PropertyTaxAteoantNumber 00 2p0Z 1 00 0 1 -- 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feety 4. . is this site currently developed? _yes; _ If yes; how is. site developed? no. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply- Flat- Iess than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. �C polling. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 664eet). billy: slopes present on site of more than 15% and. less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal, distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-ro=d standing water. ; Approx_ Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? S. Site is in the floodway — floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? Wo Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is rimaril forested • meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landsca ed awp, shrubs et 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: 1. Plan Check Nuniber, if Al 2 Site is Zoned? 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)7 4. 5. —For City' Staff Use Only nn Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? Site within designated earth -subsidence landslide hazard area? LJ[Q DETQZMINATION WAIVER 07/13/2006 20:57 5413183400 OP20 PINNACLE 0 PAGE 05 ° City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 IQe, l a90 Pare: 425.771-0221 n fill r Tlx Critical Areas Checklist contained on this farm is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application. for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of'the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City stab to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject city. The information needed to eompi kl—b�easily . im observations of the site or data avagial (Critical areas inventories, maps, or iD awj-6�5gD Date. Received: 3114 1 U . City Receipt #-. QQ Critical Areas File k ' Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or basher authorized representative, rmast`fill out the cLecklist,sign and date it, and subunit it . to the .City. The City will review the checklist, .make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map. along with the sij i copy .of this form to assist City staff in fording and locating the specific piece of property described on fts (form. In 0" -the applicant shall include. other pertinent ,con .(,c site plan, topography map, etc-) or studi in comju notion with this Checklist to assistant staff in c leting their preliminary assessment of the site. The un ed applic and hisJher/its heirs, and assi consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, in defend and hold the City o nds harmless fiom any and all damages, inehtdmg reasonable anomey's fees, arising from any ac arx ar infraction• based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information finuished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information, and ai nbits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my Imowledge and that I am authorized to file "Pis app!'vation on the behalf of the owner as listed below. f SIGNATURE OF ArTUCANT/AGENT DATE .711110 Property Owner's Authorization - By my signature, I certify that I Lave authorized the above Applicant/Agent-to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and postrattendarl4o this application. SIGNA fIJILB OF OWNER A � — DATE 7// 14 b PLEASE PRINT GLEAKLY Owaer/Applicant: 74ame 2018o LY i vJoh Street Address _ City St�a��reAA � Zip Telephoxne:��y� `Ng~ ?36Bi Email address. (optional): 1 h h! e C a 60l Applicant Re taatative: � 4 * k , Name • . Street Address City State . Telephone: Email Address (optional): Zip Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLC Engineer October 27, 20o6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Heinzig Enterprizes, Inc. 16909 3rd Avenue SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Seismic Building Upgrade 1115 4th Avenue South Edmonds, Washington RMP Project No. 06-232-01 Dear Mr. Heinzig, ^? (71-- l ID This report provides recommendations for the design and installation of helical anchors that will be used to resist seismic ground motions on the Calais apartments located at 1115 4th Avenue South in Edmonds. We have met and discussed the procedures you are following to evaluate the strength characteristics of the existing three story building using IBC 2003 design parameters for this analysis. Based on the results of your preliminary analysis the structure shear wall system will need upgrading along the west side of the building. In addition to foundation tie -down anchors there will be a need for helical ground anchors to transfer vertical structure loads into the subsoils as well as to provide for uplift resistance. Our previous reports provided confirmation of the design parameters that you are using in connection with this voluntary seismic upgrade. Site Conditions The Calais property is underlain by dense Outwash deposits consisting of silty sands, sandy silts and gravels. These soils extend under the three story building to depths in excess of 25 feet and they are dense to very dense to this full depth. The permanent groundwater table is at least 50 feet below this property, and due to the dense nature of the underlying soils the potential for liquefaction is considered very low. The building pad was excavated to a level surface and the foundations were constructed on the onsite native soils. Excellent foundation support is available at or near the ground surface. Geotechnical Recommendations An allowable soil bearing value of 2500 psf may be used for evaluation existing bearing wall foundations under this three story structure. This value is appropriate for footings 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 11 October 27, 2006 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 2 that are at least 16 inches in width and a minimum of 18 inches below existing exterior grades. For new underpinning pad footings under the shear walls, this value may be increased to 3500 psf where the pads are at least 2x2 feet in dimension. This bearing value may be increased by 33% to account for temporary loading from seismic or wind conditions. It is recommended that the grade beam excavation be hand compacted with a mechanical tamper to provide a firm and unyielding surface for proper interaction with the underlying native soils. Soil strength criteria for this site can be based on the following: Dense Outwash soils (silt -sand) c = 100 psf, cp = 38°, y = 120 pcf Active pressures on buried walls should be analyzed for 35 pcf with a level backfill condition. Resistance to lateral forces can be provided by a passive pressure of 300 pcf on continuous bearing wall foundations, and a value of 350 pcf on retaining walls (FS = 1.5). Estimated total settlement for the existing or new foundations will be less than 1/2 inch under DL + LL or dead plus seismic loading. Estimated differential settlement will be about 1/2 of the total settlement over a distance of 20 to 25 feet. A subgrade modulus Of 250 pci may be used for these dense Outwash soils. Temporary screw jacks will be required for support of the existing footings while the new pad footings and grade beam are excavated and poured under the new shear wall construction. These jacks will be placed on an 18x18 inch concrete pad and a 6x6 inch steel plate for proper bearing under the existing foundations at 36 inches on center. Subgrade soils exposed under the screw jacks should be inspected prior to pouring the individual concrete pads. Helical anchors will be installed under each end of the shear walls that will be located across the west side of the building, and they will extend into the new grade beam. These anchors may extend into the existing foundation walls if they have sufficient strength and a suitable connection can be made. It may also be possible to extend the hold down anchors into the grade beam below the shear walls, with the helical anchors at the ends of the grad beam. On the basis of the above soil strengths and our experience with similar soil conditions in Edmonds, we recommend that 12 inch diameter, single helix Dixie anchors (N-6203- 0013) be installed at the locations as specified in your seismic design. These anchors will include a 1i/2 inch square shaft with a 1/2 inch thick single helix that is hot -dipped and galvanized per ASTM A153• Installation will be accomplished with a portable drive capable of up to 6500 ft lbs of torque. Actual applied torque should be limited to a maximum of 4500 to 5000 ft lbs to 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 • 0 October 27, 20o6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 3 reach the design capacities of 20 kips vertical load and 12 kips of uplift. These are working loads that have a factor of safety of two included. At least 90 to 95% of the anticipated compressive forces and all of the uplift forces during seismic ground motions will be transferred from the shear walls through the grade beam and into the helical anchors at each end of the grade beam. Field load testing should also be performed on the first installed anchor location using appropriate jacking and pressure cell equipment to record the amount of torque resistance provided by the anchor. Expected depth of these anchors will range from 15 to possibly 20 feet, but will be determined by the resistance of the dense Outwash soils. Field inspection should be performed during the drilling of all of the helical anchors to verify their actual load capacities as installed. Summary Special inspection services should be preformed during initial excavation for the underpinning pads and grade beam installation to confirm compliance with the project drawings and specifications. Appropriate testing and inspection of the helical anchor installations will also be required. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on 1) our interpretation and evaluation of soil conditions on this site, 2) confirmation of the actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction, and 3) the assumption that sufficient observation and testing will be provided during appropriate phases of the work. Our findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted principles of geotechnical engineering as practiced in the Puget Sound area at the time this report was submitted. We make no warranty, either express or implied. Please call me if you have any questions, or you wish to discuss this report in greater detail. Respectfully, Robert M. Pride, P. E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer dist: (2) Addressee rmp: CloustonWall6 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLCEngineer 7 October 24, 2oo6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Heinzig rP Ente rizes, Inc. 16909 3rd Avenue SE Jt''G�'�v�r Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Seismic Building Upgrade 1115 4th Avenue South Edmonds, Washington RMP Project No. 06-232-01 Dear Mr. Heinzig, This report provides a engineering assessment of the Geologic Site Hazards for use in the design of the owner proposed voluntary partial seismic upgrade for the Calais apartment building located at 1115 41h Avenue South in Edmonds. It is my understanding that the City of Edmond's Building Department will provide both initial and permit review/approval of the owner's proposed scope of voluntary seismic assessment and seismic upgrade to the Calais building's existing lateral force resisting system, which the owner proposes as: ■ A limited scope, structural engineering condition survey and report. ■ A limited scope, structural engineering seismic assessment per Tier 1 ASCE 31- 03 (Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings) to identify potential (seismic hazard) life safety concerns. ■ A limited scope, structural engineering seismic assessment of (E) LFRS design deficiencies against the historic code (1982 UBC), and comparison with the IBC 2003 strength design criteria. • Selective alteration to the existing building's lateral force resisting system's existing shear walls, diaphragm chords & foundation system per IBC 2003: Section 104.11 & Section 1614.4 Both the owner & Mark Heinzig, PE indicated the proposed circa 2006 seismic rehab to the Calais Apartment will not include any structural additions, change in building occupancy or structural alteration to existing building members that would either increase the (historic,1982 UBC) seismic force of any existing structural element by more than 5%, nor decreases the design strength of an existing structural element by more than 5%. It is my understanding that owner proposes a voluntary, selective seismic rehab to the 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 October 24, 2006 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 2 Calais apartment building per IBC 2003 Section 104.11 and Section 1614.4, rather than the trying to meet the full IBC 2003 seismic design provisions (IBC 2003 Sections 1613 through 1623) typically required of new buildings. Please refer to Mark Heinzig, PE 11/i/o6 Calais seismic rehab plans and the accompanying 11/1/o6 letter for elaboration on the scope of seismic assessment/rehab for the Calais Apartment. The Geologic Site Hazards and Foundation Checklist as contained in ASCE 31-03 "Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings" includes the following items as described in Section 3.8: • Liquefaction — the onsite soils consist of dense to very dense Outwash silty sands and gravels; depths to the groundwater table are well over 5o feet, and these soils are not subject to liquefaction; (compliant) • Slope Failure — the existing building was constructed on a level graded pad on native soils; there are no slopes adjacent to the building that would impact the stability of the existing foundations; seismic ground forces will not adversely affect this building site; (compliant) Surface Fault Rupture — the nearest known fault zone is the Whidbey Island fault zone that is located 7 miles to the northeast; the potential for ground rupture due to a nearby earthquake epicenter on this fault zone is considered very low; return periods on this fault system are well in excess of 500 years for a moderate sized earthquake; (compliant) • Foundation Performance — an inspection of the existing perimeter foundation walls supporting this three story building show no evidence of differential settlement or lateral movement; in our opinion the foundation system has performed well over the life of the structure, and will continue to provide satisfactory structural support; (compliant) • Deterioration — based on the above foundation inspection there is no evidence of • concrete deterioration or damage due to corrosion or chemical attack; (compliant) This building site and foundation evaluation was performed in support of the Tier 1 Evaluation and the voluntary seismic upgrade that involves life safety issues only. It is understood that the City of Edmonds has authorized this limited scope per IBC 2003 Code that is based on member strength of the existing structural components. Based on our site investigation and geotechnical analyses, it is our opinion that no further site evaluations need to be conducted. 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 October 24, 2oo6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 3 7 Please call me if you have any questions. Respectfully, ioert iMPride, . E. Principal Geotechnical Er dist: (2) Addressee (1) Monte Clouston rmp: CloustonWall4 T M. aF WAS l o 16271 S�oNAL' EXPIRES 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98o34 Phone: 425-$14-397o Fax: 425-814-5672 Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLC October 24, 2006 Mr. Mark Heinzir% � BILE Heinzig Enterpriz c. 16909 3rd Avenue SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: Geotechnical Recommendations Proposed Seismic Building Upgrade 1115 4th Avenue South Edmonds, Washington RMP Project No. 06-232-01 Dear Mr. Heinzig, This is to confirm certain seismic/geotechnical parameters that will be used in the design of the owner propose partial seismic upgrade for the Calais apartment building located at 1115 41hAvenue South in Edmonds. These design criteria are based on the ASCE 7-02 Load Calculations and the 2003 IBC manual, and includes the following: • Ground Motion — for this site location in Edmonds the applicable factors with 5% damping are: Ss = 1.26g (0.2 sec response), and S, = 0.439 (1.0 sec response); • Site Classification — based on the underlying dense glacial deposits, we have classified this site as "D" have a shear wave velocity of 60o to 1,200 ft/sec; • Site Coefficients — using a straight line interpretation, Fa =1.0o and Fv =1.57; • Maximum Earthquake Acceleration — Sms =1.26 and Sm, = 0.67; • Design Spectral Acceleration — using a 2/3 value of peak acceleration results in Sds = 0.84 and Sdi = 0.45; It is my understanding that the City of Edmond's Building Department will provide both initial and permit review/approval of the owner's proposed scope of voluntary seismic assessment and seismic upgrade to the Calais building's existing lateral force resisting system, which the owner proposes as: A limited scope, structural engineering condition survey and report. A limited scope, structural engineering seismic assessment per Tier 1 ASCE 31- 03 (Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings) to identify potential (seismic hazard) life safety concerns. A limited scope, structural engineering seismic assessment of (E) LFRS design deficiencies against the historic code (1982 UBC), and comparison with the IBC 2003 strength design criteria. 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98o34 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 as October 24, 2oo6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 2 • Selective alteration to the existing building's lateral force resisting system's existing shear walls, diaphragm chords & foundation system per IBC 2003: Section 104.11 & Section i614.4 Both the owner & Mark Heinzig, PE indicated the proposed circa 2oo6 seismic rehab to the Calais Apartment will not include any structural additions, change in building occupancy or structural alteration to existing building members that would either increase the (historic, 1982 UBC) seismic force of any existing structural element by more than 5%, nor decreases the design strength of an existing structural element by more than 5%. It is my understanding that owner proposes a voluntary, selective seismic rehab to the Calais apartment building per IBC 2003 Section 104.11 and Section 1614.4, rather than the trying to meet the full IBC 2003 seismic design provisions (IBC 2003 Sections 1613 through 1623) typically required of new buildings. Please refer to Mark Heinzig, PE ii/i/o6 Calais seismic rehab plans and the accompanying ii/i/o6 letter for elaboration on the scope of seismic assessment/rehab for the Calais Apartment. Please call me if you have any questions. Respectfully, ! �IV �� OF WAS,% C> 4 � Robert M. Pride, . E. Principal Geotechnical Enginee dist: (2) Addressee (1) Monte Clouston rmp: CloustonWa115 16211 �Ca R�ISIL•�� .� AL E>CaG EXPIRES 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 0 • Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLC Engineer October 18, 2oo6 Mr. Mark Heinzig 9LEHeinzig Ent rite� Inc. G,,> i6go9 3rd Avenue SE Mill Creek, WA° 98012 Re: Report on Geotechnical Assessment Proposed Wall Replacement 1115 4th Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr- Heinzig, This report confirms my revised recommendations concerning the replacement retaining walls behind the carport at the Calais apartments at 1125 4th Avenue South in Edmonds. The original concrete retaining wall height was to be 4 to 5 feet, but there was a design change to allow construction of this wall to a final height of 6' 6'. Our original recommendations included an active earth pressure of 35 pcf and a passive pressure of 25o pcf be used in the design of this new wan. An allowable soil bearing value of 2000 psf was increased to 250o psf based on the presence of dense native silty sands in the base of the footing excavations for both the concrete wall and the interlocking block wall. The latter block wall was also increased in height to a maximum Of 4' 3" using the increased bearing pressure. In my July 7th letter I recommended the use of a peak ground acceleration value of o.o7g in addition to the recommended active earth. pressure. A site inspection was made just prior to the pouring of the concrete wall footing and the segmented block wall footing, and we approved the bearing soils for the revised 250o psf design value. I was aware of the field inspections made by Mark Heinzig during the construction of both retaining walls, installation of the rear wall subdrain, and the backfilling of these walls. Please call me if you have any questions. oWAsi,y�� o � hV O r. Robert M. Pride, Principal GeotechnicaI En gin r disc: (2) Addressee 16271 rmp: CloustonWait3 �G?� S''oNwL E� Phone: 425-814-3970 13203 WA 98o34 Fax: 425-8i4-5672 Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLC Engineer June 9, 2006 -P Mr. Mark Heinzig�IL Heinzig Enterprizes, Inc. 16909 3rd Avenue SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: Report on Geotechnical Assessment � Proposed Wall Replacement;;f:�:: 1115 4'h*Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Heinzig, This report summarizes the results of our site investigation and geotechnical evaluation of the existing retaining wall that has rotated. The purpose of our site inspection was to document the site soil and slope conditions, and to provide recommendations for the design of the replacement wall system. 'Existing wall height ranges from about 4 to 5 feet behind the carport where there is a 2H:1V slope extending up to the apartment building on the east side of the property. This concrete wall will be replaced with a n interlocking block wall about 41/2 feet high with a 2H:1V slope extending up 2 to 3 feet up to the property line. On the basis of our site inspection and review of your construction drawings, it is my opinion that the proposed Keystone (or Mesa) wall can be constructed as proposed. This wall will have a granular drainage blanket behind the block, and will abut the native stiff sand silt soils. It is recommended that an active earth pressure of 35 pcf and a passive pressure of 250 pcf be used in the design of this new wall. An allowable soil bearing value of 2000 psf may be used for support of the base of the interlocking block wall. This wall should be underlain by 4 to 6 inches of crushed gravel, and the lowest block should be embedded at least 8 inches below final grade. The existing apartment building foundations are 18 to 20 feet behind the new wall and will have no lateral pressure influence on the earth pressures acting on the block wall. Temporary slope cuts in the native soils may be made at V/21-1:1V up to a height of five feet. Above that height the slope should be laid back at a 11-1:1V gradient to prevent sloughing into the wall construction area. A four inch perforated pipe surrounded in grain gravel and wrapped in filter cloth 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 June g, 2oo6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 2 should be placed at the base of the wall. The backfill above the wall for the 2H:1V slope should be compacted with a hand tamper or a vibratory roller on the backfill placed behind the lower two walls. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully, '\N' QAq Robert M. PridV"1, E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer dist: (2) Addressee rmp: CloustonWalli EXPIRES 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425- 814-5672 -e CITY of EDMIIDS For Inspection Call 771-3202 W J LL Address of Construction: i'% kc:"EIMED OCT 151985 SOFE SEWER PERMIT ERMIT N0. 0%399 ' PUBLIC _WORKS r�� EDMONDS L TREATMENT PLANI Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Builder: r'1' Of-L VI s / Contractor & License No: 6 Single Family Residence Multi -Family Commercial (No. of Units /._ ) (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No 4`_' Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No ✓� Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK. I certify that I have read and shall comply with the items listed on the back. Date Permit Fee: 3e,cc Issued By: _Y6 Trunk Charge: 34W00 Date Issued: %-/�S_- fT- Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: 11 2 1 Partial Inspection: Comments c% Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial Rejected: son Date Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy - File Green Copy - Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant 47*� Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO. ---------------- -------------- -------------; NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 0 LID NO ................... ASMT. NO - ------------------ OWNER r Xmme ------ CLOUSTO-114 ---------------------------- CONTRACTOR --- LuT.z.,-'s ------ - ------------ PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS ... ------ 4-.`"r".-.'00bk ------------------ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO. - ---------- MWOND9 ......................................................................... ...... I -.TRE..ATM.E..N�j. T NAME OF ADDITION ............. - ------ .................................... 4-r- VA 3.5,1>p. 3.5 C-0. CAP I SDP, 4'0P ra"c-a-wtic T 10.5 Mc . . 4 -F 14 A-v(:--. So. 7'-4wco Approved: PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11178) DATE AN -NE By....................... xx� To: Jeannine Graf, Bldg Official, Ann Bullis Assistant Bldg Official City of Edmonds, Building Division From: Mark Heinzig, PE Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. 16909 Yd Ave SE, Mill Creek WA 98012 CC: Monte Clouston, Property Owner, Bend, Or Project: Calais Apartment,1115 0 Ave S Edmonds, WA Re: Civil Site Repairs & Temporary Dewatering for Circa 2007 Calais Apartment Seismic Upgrade/Foundation Repairs Date: July 27, 2007 n ece ��® JUL 3 0 2007 BUILDING CITY OF EDmp 0SNr Ref Plans: PE stamped, Permit Approved Calais Temporary Dewater Plans, Dated 4/16/07 Ref Plans: PE stamped, Permit Approved Calais Seismic Rehab Drawings, Dated 5/8/07 Rehab Repairs by: Monte Clouston, et al (Property Owner & Builder, his subcontractors & workers) As E.O.R. for the Calais Apartment Seismic Rehab of 2007, and associated foundation repairs, I am writing this engineer letter to inform the City of Edmonds (Bldg Dept & Public Works Dept) that Monte Clouston (Owner/Contractor) has satisfactorily: • completed the Temporary Dewatering for the Circa 2007 Calais Apartment Seismic/Found Repairs • repaired the (E) onsite storm drainage pipe damaged during install of the Temporary Dewatering System. • repaired the (E) onsite water supply pipe damaged during install of the Temporary Dewatering System. • repaired the (E) onsite sewer pipe damaged during install of the Temporary Dewatering System. • repaired the (E) onsite driveway payment cut/replaced during install of the Temporary Dewatering System. It is my understanding the circa 2007 Calais Apartment civil & structural upgrades was undertaken by the Owner as a prelude to a rental -to -condo conversion, and this letter & completed repairs may help satisfy both the City of Edmonds & WA State Housing Bill, ERB 1848. During construction, I performed periodic civil site observation (site visits) at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, to observe the progress and quality of work completed by the Owner/Contractor. I found the install of the temporary dewatering system & repairs to the existing utilities to be in general conformance with the design intent of the PE stamped, permit approved drawings referenced above, and PE stamped post -permit, engineer field repair details. Finally, while all circa 2007 onsite civil infrastructure repairs that I field observed were performed by the Owner/Contractor in general conformance with design intent of the above referenced, permit approved plans & field details, I am not providing any direct or implied construction warranty on the recent utilities repairs. Further, I am not responsible for any acts or omission of the Owner, Contractor or subcontractor providing any portion of the circa 2006 — 2007 repairs. Finally, I am not responsible for, nor providing any guarantee concerning the existing condition, or future performance of the exposed/concealed civil utilities & pavements, historically designed/installed by other parties. Respectful) yours, I Mar/HeL4!eE Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. 16909 3`d Ave SE, Mill Creek, WA 98012 425-208-6877 cel, Heinzig@MSN.com 07 I17c.18o)0 May 4, 2006 CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSO MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Mr. Monte Clouston 20180 Winston Loop Bend, Oregon 97701 RE: 1115 41h Avenue South, Edmonds VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. Clouston, I?F5 190� In response to your letter dated May 2, 2006 to Steve Bullock, Senior Planner and your letter to me dated May 3, 2006, the following information is provided regarding the proposed construction work at 1115 41h Avenue South in Edmonds: • Based on the work described in your 5/2/06 letter, the Planning Division has determined the work is consistent with the original building approval and no additional design review is required. Should the project change please notify Steve Bullock, Senior Planner and myself. • A permit is required for re -roofing. Provide a roof section detail and include the proposed continuous ridge vent and flashing. At minimum, a final roofing inspection is required (once we review the roof detail and understand all aspects of the roof work additional inspections may be required). In order to calculate permit fees provide a written (licensed contractors) bid for the roofing and vent work (fair market labor and materials). • A separate permit is required for the stucco repair if the lath is affected. When such a permit is required the City needs a written estimate (labor and materials for this work) and inspections include lath and final inspection. • Snohomish County Assessor records indicate the market improvement (building value without land) at $726,300.00 which differs from the amount quoted in your 5/3/06 letter. For building enclosure calculation purposes the market improvement value shall be used to determine the rehabilitative construction percentage for compliance to HB 1848. • The total enclosure work you have described (roof and stucco repair) make up the 5% rehabilitative construction percentage for HB 1848 compliance. Because a building permit is required for the work you have described, City staff determines at application submittal if the 5% rule applies (based on Assessor market improvement value and written contractor bids). If the 5% rule applies, the Building Enclosure Design documents (as described in HB 1848) are required at submittal and must be prepared by a State of Washington Licensed Architect or Engineer --unless a recorded irrevocable Sale Prohibition Covenant is submitted with the permit application. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 0 Mr. Clouston Page Two May 4, 2006 • The Oregon roofer who you have indicated will perform the work must obtain a State of Washington Contractors License (unless an exemption can be proven --please refer to the attached exemption form). • A City Business License is also required for any company performing construction work within the City, (contact City Business License Clerk for license information). • In order to expedite this letter I did not verify that the building was constructed in 1987 under the 1985 UBC and I did not verify that the plans at the time of original plan review were not required to be stamped by a licensed Architect. Please confirm that you still need this information verified by the City. • The City archives will contain certain building plans and detailed drawings but it is unknown whether all plans and details for the original building project are archived. • Please fax your contractor's bids attention to Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator (425-771- 0221) and she will be more than happy to calculate the required permit fees. If you have any additional questions please feel free to contact me or my staff during City business hours of 9:OOam to noon and 1:OOpm to 4:OOpm, Monday through Friday. Sincerely, 61A-wm Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Steve Bullock, Senior Planner Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator EXEMPTION IPROM CONTRACTOR IRGISTRATION VERIFICATION FORM The undersigned property owner or contractor has applied for a building permit from the City of Edmonds and claims that he/she/it are exempt from providing contractor registration in accordance with the provisions of RCW 18.27. The property owner, by their signature below hereby verifies to the City of Edmonds that: ❑ Value of work under $500.00. The aggregate contract price of labor and materials and all other items required for the project is less than $500.00 and is not part of a larger opertation to be undertaken on the property. The person employed to do this work has not advertised nor otherwise put himself forward to the permittee to be a contractor or qualified to engage in the business of a contract. RCW 18.27.090(9). ❑ Work performed personally on own property. The undersigned verifies that all work done under this permit will be done by the permittee personally on his/her own property and that the improvements constructed on the property are not being undertaken with the intention and purpose of selling the improved property. ❑ Commercial property exemption. The permittee is the owner of commercial property and the owner's own employees will perform all maintenance, repair and alteration work on the property. No work will be done by contract under the permit. RCW 18.27.090(13). ❑ Licensed architect, engineer, electrician or plumber. All work performed under this permit will be performed by an architect, civil or professional engineer, licensed electrician or licensed plumber operating within the scope of his or her license. RCW 18.27.090(14). ❑ General Contractor. The owner is the General Contractor for the project and is required to hire a minimum of two licensed subcontractors (unrelated building trades or crafts). The general contractor is responsible to verify all State licenses of subcontractor. RCW 18.27.010 THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNER HEREBY VERIFIES THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IF ANY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS FALSE, HE OR SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE IMMEDIATELY REVOKED AND ALL FEES PAID FORFEITED. Dated this day of , 20 _ PROPERTY OWNER/PERMITTEE Signature Print WITNESS Signature Print LATGMP\BUILDING\FORMS\exemp contractor regis verif form.doc02/01/06 *************** —COMM. NAL— ******************* DATE MAY-04-20 *** TIME 14:53 *** P.01 MODE = MEMORY TRANSMISSION START=MAY-04 14:51 END=MAY-04 14r53 FILE NO.= 165 STN NO. COM ABBR NO. STATION NAME/TEL.NO. PAGES DURATION 001 OK s e5413183400 003/003 00:01'10" fnC.IW3 May 4, 2006 GARY HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR 121 STM AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 99020 - (425) 7 1- w�+nN. FAX (mOn63 1-022 Wete DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Mr. Monte Clouston 20180 Winston Loop Bend, Oregon 97701 RE: 1115 41h Avenue South, Edmonds VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. Clouston, In response to your letter dated May 2, 2006 to Steve Bullock, Senior Planner and your letter to me dated May 3, 2006, the following information is provided regarding the proposed construction work at 1115 4ch Avenue South in Edmonds: • Based on the work described in your 5/2/06 letter, the Planning Division has determined the work is consistent with the original building approval and no additional design review is required. Should the project change please notify Steve Bullock, Senior Planner and myself. • A permit is required for re -roofing. Provide a roof section detail and include the proposed continuous ridge vent and flashing. At minimum, a final roofing inspection is required (once we review the roof detail and understand all aspects of the roof work additional inspections may be required). In order to calculate permit fees provide a written (licensed contractors) bid for the roofing and vent work (fair market labor and materials). • A separate permit is required for the stucco repair if the lath is affected. When such a permit is required the City needs a written estimate (labor and materials for this work) and inspections include lath and final inspection. • Snohomish County Assessor records indicate the market improvement (building value without land) at $726,300.00 which differs from the amount quoted in your 5/3/06 letter. For building enclosure calculation purposes the market improvement value shall be used to determine the rehabilitative construction percentage for compliance to HB 1848. • The total enclosure work you have described (roof and stucco repair) make up the 5% rehabilitative construction percentage for HB 1848 compliance. Because a building permit is required for the work you have described, City staff determines at application submittal if the 5% rule applies (based on Assessor market improvement value and written contractor bids). If the 5% rule applies, the Building Enclosure Design documents (as described in HB 1848) are required at submittal and must be prepared by a State of Washington Licensed Architect or Engineer --unless a recorded irrevocable Sale Prohibition Covenant is submitted with the peiTnit application. C • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sector r.itxr . Hokinan..laoan STREET FILE Calais Aartment's Carport-Re-pal*rs 2006 Edmonds, WA 98020 rolect 'i'eam: Owner PALMER CLOUSTON TRUST Phone: 541 318-3400 20180 WINSTON LOOP FAX: Contact.: 318-3 ONTE CLAUSTON BEND, OREGON 97701 Contractor & PINNACLE CONSTRUCTION and Phone: 541 318-3400 _ Permit: DEVELOPMENT LLC FAX: (541) Contact: 318-3400 oNTE CLAt1STON 20180 WINSTON LOOP BEND, OREGON 97701 Carport Repair HEINZIG ENTERPRISES, INC. Phone: (425 208-6877 Engineering: 16909 3rd AVE SE Co tact:: 42 —5573 7K HEINZIG, PE MILL CREEK, WA 98012 Carport Repair Mr. Robert M. Pride Geo—Engineering: 13203 Holmes Point DR NE Kirkland, WA 98034 425-814-3970 Segmented Wall Mutual Materials 253-582-7347 Material Supplier: Bob Freitas, Sales Rep Tacoma, WA . 98444 REcEIVEID J U t 13 2006 BUILDING DEPT. CI COPY 0 • Engineer's Discussion on Carport's 2006 Engineered Repairs (Mark Heinzig, PE of Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. July 8, 2006) L Overview: Following is a brief narrative summary of the Calais Apartment's Carport design/permit history between 1981- 2006, recap of Mark Heinzig, PE circa 2006 non-invasive structural condition survey of the Carport, it's (existing) structural deficiencies, and an overview of the circa 2006 Carport engineered repairs designed & drafted by Mark Heinzig, PE of Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. IL Design, Permit & Construction History: As outlined on S 1.0, based on archived permit records obtained from the City of Edmond's Building Dept., the 1-story, semi -opened, Carport structure is part of the Calais Apartment Complex originally designed in 1981 by Robert E. Young (WA Architect # 1394) & WA PE civil engineer Duane C. McMahan of McMahan & Baker, Inc in 1981-1982, per the1982 Uniform Building Code & City of Edmonds Development Code in effect (See reference drwg A1). The "original" Calais Carport design by Robert Young (depicted on A 1) was `changed' by Owner Monte Clouston in 1984, with PE stamped structural drawings in 8.5x1 t & l 1x17 format prepared by WA PE Kevan Pirbazar, included in Part 6. On 6/24/05, the Owner/Contractor, Monte Clouston of Western Commercial, applied for construction permit for the Calais Apartment complex (3- story bldg + Carport) with the City of Edmonds (Permit #850461), and received subsequent permit approval, construction inspection review/approval. After construction, Monte received a June 12, 1985, Certificate of Occupancy from Mr. Harold M. Reeves, Bldg Dept. III. Structural Condition Survey, Circa 2006. As part of rental to -condo conversion effort, Monte retained Mark Heinzig, PE of Heinzig Enterprises, Inc to perform a limited scope, non-invasive, structural condition survey of the existing Calais Apartment complex, including review of the existing Carport. During (2) field visits, Mark observed several (apparent) structural deficiencies in the Carport's existing lateral force resisting system (LFRS), and evidence of excessive damage to (some parts) of the (E) Carport's retaining wall system; this included some excessive wall rotation, excessive width "through wall" cracks, & spalling of (E) retaining wall concrete in proximity to embedded post bases/columns along Grid B columns between Grid 2 - 9. Also, since the (E) Carport's existing 6x14 roof beams were supported by 6x cols, securely bolted to "rotating" retaining walls along Grid B, they (some columns & roof beams) were also `rotating' & showing signs of member/connection distress. Altogether, these conditions, field documented in (50+) photographs & engineering sketches (not included), left portions of the Carport superstructure (along Grid B) vulnerable to partial collapse, due either to `P-Delta' effects or continued (excessive) rotation & collapse of the retaining wall system. IV. Carport's (E) LFRS Design Vulnerabilities: Mark's informal review of the Carport's existing LFRS system historic design (Part 6), indicates it didn't meet the 1982 UBC code criteria, and had several design/detailing flaws. It appears the historic design engineer (Kevan Pirbazar, PE) intended the Carport's (E) LFRS system to consist of (a series of) transverse timber "rigid" frames, (1) gabled end reinforced shear wall & (1) longitudinal reinforced shear wall along Grid D. But, neither the Carport's `in -place' transverse or longitudinal LFRS system were (apparently) properly designed, detailed or field installed accordingly. Therefore, the Carport's LFRS system was structurally deficient, and vulnerable to code prescribed N/S & E/W lateral loading. For example, there wasn't any LFRS system on either the N or West side of the Carport superstructure, and there were several LFRS structural deficiencies on both the E & S side of the Carport structure. Some other (observed) design deficiencies & field install errors included excessive diaphragm aspect ratios, unblocked diaphragm, incomplete drag strut/chord force connections, (suspect) inadequate diaphragm nailing, & missing/incomplete detailing of LFRS elements & transfer mechanisms. For example, there was /J, no means of collecting & transferring longitudinal (N/S) lateral forces to the N/S reinforced retaining (shear) wall at Grid line B (beyond). Nor, was there any (E/W) transverse (interior) shear -walls. Nor was there any gabled end (transverse) shear -walls on the , North or South gabled ends; as would be both necessary, if the engineer intended the roof structure to act as a series of discrete 3- Sided diaphragms, with an `open' end along the full length of grid C. !V Carport's (E) Retaining Wall Vulnerabilities;, Mark's field, and (informal) office review of the Carport's historic, existing retaining wall historic design (included in Part 6), and independent analysis (Part 7, Enercalc software output), indicates portions of the Carport' retaining walls systems along Grid B, between Grid 3.2 — Grid 9.1 are damaged beyond serviceable repair. This is (apparently) due to improper designed & detailing, and (suspect) field install errors, most likely due to missing or `conflicting' structural detailing callouts. The wall damage & rotation can be traced to the improper design use of (undersized, 6") reinforced footing, and improperly designed/detailed wall -to -footing anchorage, which resulted in a semi -fixed condition or `semi -pinned' condition' rather than wall/footing `fixity' required of a cantilevered retaining wall to properly resist lateral earth pressures from retained soils. Other (apparent) problems improperly designed footings, essentially improper (too small) footing toe geometry, and insufficient stem wall thickness to allow for proper concrete cover of wall reinforcement near post -base connections. These (apparent) design omissions, coupled with (suspect) improper field errors, has resulted in (suspect) excessive soil pressures, partial footing failure, excessive wall rotation, and excessive `through wall' cracks field along Grid B wall, roughly between Grid 3 — 9.1. And, while no assessment` can be made of `concealed' footings or concealed retaining walls, there wasn't any (observed) excessive wall rotation nor (observed) field damage to the exposed faces of the 8" thick reinforced retaining wall system on Grid B, roughly between Grid 9.1 — Grid 11, nor any (observed) field damaged (beyond serviceable repair) to the (E) exposed faces of the existing retaining walls along Grid 1 & 11. V. Carport's 2006 LFRS Upgrade (Seismic Retrofit): At the owner's direction, Mark engineered repairs to upgrade the (E) Carport's superstructure to meet current (IBC2003) code prescribed wind & seismic loads, rather than historic 1982 UBC criteria. The engineer analysis & repairs are included in Part I — 4 of this PE stamped calcs set, and the attached PE stamped (2406) structural repair drawings. In brief; the "seismic retrofit' involved upgrading the Carport's existing LFRS system to handle the worst case, (current) code prescribed (lateral) seismic forces2 or lateral winds & uplift forces. The (BC 2003) wind analysis3 utilizes ASCE7-02 criteria for an open structure, with Exposure Category B, Importance Factor = 1, Basic Wind Speed = 85 mph (3-Second Gust), and a topographic factor Kzt=1.0.Other wind analysis design coefficients are included in the structural drawing notes and wind cafes. 1 While Mark has attempted to assess the expected (long-term) performance of the (E) retaining walls via `independent' analysis of the "design condition", Mark has not, and cannot, observed the `insitu' structural condition, geometry, placement, size of the `concealed' retaining walls, footings & associated reinforcement. Therefore, neither nor Mark nor lieinzig Enterprises, Inc. can provide any warranty on the adequacy/sufficiency of (historic) 3'd party designs, nor have assessed the structural condition of `concealed' members, nor can make any groducdconstruction warranties (stated or implied) on this project. The seismic analysis employed full seismic static force procedures per IBC 2003, Section 1616.6. 1, for Site Class D, Building Category II, Use Group 1. The building system & design coefficients are included in the structural drawing notes and seismic calcs. 3 The wind forces were determined for two different "open structure" roof confi gurations, gurations, one configuration/analysis assumes a single pitched sloped roof (Carport Wind Force, Method 1), the second configuration/analysis assumed a dbl pitched, gabled end roof. Both analysis were deemed necessary, since the gross roof area was `truncated' into (3) discrete diaphragms, with the `interior' diaphragm (between Grid 5 9) not having any `hip' roof areas. Therefore, this could have materially affected the combined lateral & uplift wind uplift forces. Both wind analysis models (Method 1 & Method 2) were undertaken, and compared for each of the (3) discrete diaphragms, and the configuration/analysis resulting in the greatest lateral wind & uplift forces was used. This most conservative wind analysis was the single pitched sloped roof (Carport Wind Force, Method 1). This is designated on the attached spreadsheets as Carport Wind Force, Method 1, whereas the Carport Wind Force, Method 2 is included for reference only. 3 The flexible roof diaphragm lysis, for both wind & seismic utilized ASD ( owable strength design) lateral loading values, and was based on the contributory roof geometry & weight of each of the (3) adjacent `discrete' diaphragms (sub - diaphragms). These (3) `discrete' diaphragms are identified in the calcs, are ea bounded by LFRS elements (the interior/gabled end transverse shear walls at Grid 1, 5, 9,1 I & a continuous roof member at Grid B), and are modeled as 3-sided diaphragms for both N/S & E/W lateral loading, with an open end at Grid C. The Carport's LFRS upgrade included install of (transverse) shear walls at both Grid 1, 5 & 9, and] 1, strengthening of the Grid B as a continuous drag element, and upgrade of the other (aforementioned) LFRS structural deficiencies. By placing interior shear walls at Grid 5 & 9, it was possible to break up the overall roof diaphragm into (3) discrete, adjacent, 3-Sided, `open ended' diaphragms that meet the current code's diaphragm `aspect ratio". Each discrete diaphragm, within the overall roof system is bounded by (N) shear walls on the N/S sides and a continuous (E) 6x12 bm element along the grid B. Whereas, Grid C, the West side of the roof structure, remains open. Other seismic (LFRS) upgrades field removal & replacement of (E) 3-tab asphalt roofing after field verification/install of (adequate) roof diaphragm nailing and ridge blocking. Also, by providing tension ties (continuity) between adjacent (E) beams at Grid B, it was possible to use these (e) 6x beams either as diaphragm chord members or `drag struts. Therefore, under the N/S lateral loading event, the collected shears along Grid B were transferred to the (E) 8" reinforced concrete retaining wall (shear wall). Also, all existing (and in many cases, deficient) post/bm, post/col base, truss/bm, truss/wall, and diaphragm/shearwall connections were reviewed, and properly detailed on the engineered repair drawings, so as to allow for a proper LFRS transfer mechanism, and to provide sufficient wind uplift resistance. Finally, to insure that proposed seismic (LFRS) retrofit repairs to Carport meets the design intent of the PE stamped drawings, the repair drawings require the Owner to retain the''E:O.R (Mark Heinzig, PE) on a T&E basis, to perform periodic engineering field observation during construction. VI. Carport's 2006 Retaining Wall Upgrade. At the owner's direction, Mark also provided circa 2006 engineered repairs to upgrade the (E) Carport's retaining wall foundations to mitigate `observed' wall failures & (observed) vulnerabilities, and to address (anticipated) future problems. These engineering foundation repairs, outlined in Part 4 &5, meet current (IBC2003, ACI 318-02) code requirements, and Geo-Engineer (Mr. Bob Pride, PE) design recommendations (Part 5). The existing damage, and proposed repairs to the (E) Carport's retaining wall system are primarily along Grid B, as clearly depicted in Structural Drawing S1, S2 & S3. Broadly speaking, the repairs include selective saw -cut & demolition of some (E) reinforced concrete walls (along Grid B, between Grid 3.2 — 9.1) that was were damaged beyond repair. In such locations, the (E) superstructure shall be temporarily shored, the (E) retaining wall cut & removed, and (N) 6x columns supporting the roof structure shall be installed upon the stem wall's remaining curb. And, in these locations, (N) Cornerstone gravity segmented retaining walls were design to be installed (uphill, behind the damaged walls), to resist the `insitu' retained soils. In some areas along Grid B (between Grid 5- Grid 9. 1), it was necessary to provide solid grouted, reinforced segmented retaining walls, whereas in other cases, (grid B, Between Grid 3.2 — Grid 5), gravel filled, gravity segmented walls was sufficient. And finally, in some locations along Grid B (between Grid 1 — 3.2), it was possible to salvage portions of the existing Grid B Carport retaining wall, by removing either part or all of the retained soils, acting against the (existing) retaining walls. VII. Geo-Engineer Participation/Recommendations: As part of the 2006 Carport repair effort, the Owner retained Geo-Engineer, Mr. Bob Pride, PE, to review the existing field conditions, and provide geo-technical design recommendations & (sub -grade) design parameters. See Part 8 for the Geo-Engineer's field letter with geo-technical design parameters for design of the Cornerstone gravity segmented retaining wall at Grid A, recommendations for maximum uphill slope, recommendations for maintaining stability of the 4 up -hill' retained soils during temporary excavation, and confirmation that he has investigated and discounted the `surcharge' effects, that the `uphill' (offsite) 4 story multifamily structure may have on the proposed gravity retaining wall design. , IX Engineer's Closing Remarks and Standard of Care: While I, (Mark Heinzig, PE) has prepared PE stamped engineered repair drawings for the upgrade of the (E) Carport's LFRS system to meet current code requirements, and have also included engineered repairs per the Geo-Engineer's recommendations, neither I (Mark Heinzig, PE) nor Heinzig Enterprises, Inc are providing the current Owner, nor any future Owner, any warranty on the adequacy or sufficiency of (historic) P party designs, nor any product warranties, nor an construction warranties (stated or implied) on this project. Nor, is my engineering discussion herein, intended as a `definitive' forensic engineering investigation of the `cause & `effect' of all observed structural damaged, or existing conditions. It solely intended to provide the Building Official an overview of the existing condition of the Carport, and some insight into the proposed scope, rational & engineering analysis for the Calais Carport repairs 2006. My work on this phase of the project has been performed, and my opinions and recommendations have been derived in a manner consistent with the level of skill ordinarily exercise by other members of the profession in good standing in the Puget Sound area, contemporaneously providing similar services in the same locality, under the same circumstances. If you have any questions, need further assistance, think I have missed a pertinent item of send me an email @ Heinzig@comcast.net. Respectfully Yours Mark Heinzig, PE Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. 16909 3rd Ave SE; Mill Creek, WA 98012 425-208-6877, heinzig(a),msn.comMark Heinzig please don't hesitate to give me a call at 425-208-6877 or Use & Limitations of these Calculations & Engineered Repair Drawings: Any use of this limited scope engineering repairs, calcs or report, by the current Owner or future Owner of the Subject property, or any portion thereof, or other Party involved, implies a full understanding & acceptance of the terms under which these materials can, and catinot, be used. These engineered calculations, recommended repairs & engineering opinions are part of a limited scope, structural repair solution prepared by a WA PE civil Engineer, utilizing Geo-Engineer design recommendations, and limited property/permit information provided by the Owner, City of Edmonds Bldg Dept, and other public available information. All engineering calcs, & repair drawings are the sole property of Heinzig Enterprises, Inc. , and solely intended for the current Client's use on the subject property. The engineered repairs, and engineer's opinions, shall not be reprinted, modified or used in part or in whole for any other purpose. It shall not be copied, or used in whole or in part, for any other project, by any party. Nor, shall they be used as an assurance or warranty, nor as a legal exhibit, for the purpose of pursuing or protecting any party against a legal action by another party, now or in the future, without the full written consent of Mark Heinzig, PE. By the act of using these engineered structural drawings, notes & calculations for permit submittal, construction use or for the `sale of the property' to another party, all parties involved indicate their full understanding and acceptance of the terms/conditions under which these drawings can be used. 5 M 0 0 Consulting Robert M. Pride, LLC Engineer July 7, 2006 Mr. Mark Heinzig Heinzig Enterprizes, Inc. 16909 3,d Avenue SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: Report on Geotechnical Assessment Proposed Wall Replacement 1115 41h Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Heinzig, This report summarizes the results of our site investigation and geotechnical evaluation of the existing retaining wall that has rotated. The purpose of our site inspection was to document the site soil and slope conditions, and to provide recommendations for the design of the replacement wall system. Existing wall height ranges from about 4 to 5 feet behind the carport where there is a 2H:1V slope extending up to the apartment building on the east side of the property. This concrete wall will be replaced with a n interlocking block wall about 4 V2 feet high with a 2H:1V slope extending up 2 to 3 feet up to the property line. On the basis of our site inspection and review of your construction drawings, it is my opinion that the proposed Keystone (or Mesa) wall can be constructed as proposed. This wall will have a granular drainage blanket behind the block, and will abut the native stiff sand silt soils. It is recommended that an active earth pressure of 35 pcf and a passive pressure of 250 pcf be used in the design of this new wall. In order to account for temporary seismic forces on the wall it is recommended that a peak ground acceleration value of o.o7g be used in addition to the active pressure. An allowable soil bearing value of 2000 psf maybe used for support of the base of the interlocking block wall. This wail should be underlain by 4 to 6 inches of crushed gravel, and the lowest block should be embedded at least 8 inches below final grade. The existing apartment building foundations are 18 to 20 feet behind the new wall and will have no lateral pressure influence on the earth pressures acting on the block wall. Temporary slope cuts in the native soils may be made at 1/21-1:1V up to a height of five feet. Above that height the slope should be laid back at a 1H:1V gradient to prevent 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98o34 Phone: 425-814-3970 Fax: 425-814-5672 July 7, 20o6 Mr. Mark Heinzig Page 2 sloughing into the wall construction area. A four inch perforated pipe surrounded in grain gravel and wrapped in filter cloth should be placed at the base of the wall. The backfill above the wall for the 2H: iV slope should be compacted with a hand tamper or a vibratory roller on the backfill placed behind the lower two walls. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully, �T M• P �� of WA 14it. Robert M. Pride, P. E.Z. Principal Geotechnical Enginee dist: (2) Addressee 16271 0 RFcrsr�� rmp: CloustonWa112 �SS�oNAI ' ExPIRES _ �11 r�� 13203 Holmes Point Drive NE Kirkland, WA 98o34 Phone: 425-$14-3970 Fax: 42 ,-814-5672 CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD SMEET FILE DATE .r. s'r FILE #,44��:�1 -,f-J SITE PLAN t,-' BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RECEIPT A�CPT SIGN EXHIBITS FEE R PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE .- OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE WONT", CLOUSTCN PHONE ADDRESS 22415 Woodway Park Road Edmonds, ;�a 5�6-5395 ZIP CODE 98020 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Robert ,young and Associates PHONE 363-6512 ADDRESS PROPERTY ADDRESS 1115 qth Ave South ZONING RM 1.5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION West 150.0 Feet of lot 6 Block 1, South Park Add. Edmonds, Wa. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1. Building Plans - Preliminary Final x Site Plan x Landscape Plan x Elevations x 2. Sign Elevations x Site Plan x Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL, 12 unit Apartment APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT July 15 198� ESTIMATED TI%fE FOR COMPLETION OF WORK Dec 198 5 RELEASE/HOLD HAR2XLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant. his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnifv, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per- mission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. (S•gnature of Applicant) and easterly section of carporAt must be completely enclosed. STRLL'i F'L 3. Miscellaneous An electric meter will be located on the east side of Building B and the north side of Building C. me ters eters must be painted to match the building. D. Landscaping and Fencing 1. Landscaping is not indicated on the plans. It will be presented at a later date. 2. An existing fence is located along the north property line. Proposed fencing to be presented later with landscaping. E. Signs Signs are not indicated on the plans. They will be presented later. All signs must be approved by the Architectural Design Board. Engineering Department Requirements 1. Parking lot layout appears satisfactory. 2. A utility development plan is required. 3. Special attention to access to a drainage system should be looked at given the lower elevation of the lot in relation to 196th St. SW. 4. The access road entrance onto 196th St SW is to have a flat approach affording good sight distances both east and west on 196th ST SW. S. Remove unused curb cuts. 6. Underground wiring is required. 7. Curbing at end of parking spaces or wheel stops is required. 8. Trees in the southeast corner of the site will have to be removed if they cause a sight distance problem. G. Fire Department Requirements Fire extinguishers are required in locations that will be indicated on the plan at time of review for a building permit. One standard fire hydrant is required for the new buildings. Location shall be near 196th St. SW and on the west side of the driveway entrance. Staff Findings The Staff finds the following: 1. Comprehensive Plan The subject proposal is consistent with the Camprehensive Plan and other adopted City policies. 2. Zoning Ordinance The subject proposal meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. ADB 8/7/85 PAGE 10 CITY OF EDMONDS AST INFORMATION SHEET ST-l"EET FILE NEW ASSET NO.g(�q ❑ ADDITION ADDITION TO ASSET NO. _ ❑ RETIREMENT Pn�perty`'of CITY OF EDMONDS DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION DEPT. NO. * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST * PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST �� U B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. ESTIMATED LIFE -a INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY 12(IDEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT is G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE b a INITIAL DATE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH D In PAIRTM FIN CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT December 2, 1982 John McGarry McDonald & McGarry Co. 1401 Madison Seattle, WA 98104 40 SMEET FILE HARVE-H. HARRISON MAYOR PROJECT: 12-unit Apt. @ 1115 4th Ave S. DEVELOPER: Frank Taylor BOND AMOUNT: $4,000.00 BOND NO: U 06 31 65 Per your request, the City of Edmonds is releasing the above bond. -It is our understanding that this project will not be built. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Division. Harold Reeves Building Official cn cc: Frank Taylor, Jabil Development Co. 111c Cn (0 zQLDo ` 111ulig2,QH1,9V C OO Yhis Firm is Ir:d_-pcndcnl?y Grmod end Opvralcd 1401 MADSON SYREET SYAWL£, WA C310-4-1332 ?HC1=: (2C3)3t_5'_23CD December 1, 1982 City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Cindy Noack Permit Coordinator Community Development Department Re: JABIL DEVELOPMENT CO. DEC 2,1982 United Pacific Insurance Company Bond No. U 06 31 65 Site Improvement Performance Bond for 12-unit Apartment Building Site @ 1115 4th So.,Edmonds,Wa. Dear Ms. Noack: Further to our telephone conversation, please issue a release for Jabil Development Corporation's Site Improvement bond, above -captioned. A return envelope is enclosed. Thank you. JM:bw enc. CC: Mr. F. M. Taylor, President Jabil Development Corporation P. 0. Box 1582 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Sincex-l.y yours, McDONALD & McGARRY CO. 7B J n McGarry Insurance Systems Unlimited Our knot✓ledge Is Your Best Insurance- W UNITED PACIFIC/ RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES SEATTLF_ BRANCH: 300 ELLIOTT AVE. WEST, SUITE 410 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 98119 AC 206 282 -0202 September 20, 1982 RECEIVED SEP* 2 11982 Dir. of Public,,_,.. City of Edmonds City Engineer 505 Bell St. Edmonds, Wa 98020 Re: Jabil Development Corporation Bond No. U06 31 65 Gentlemen: On May 11, 1978, we executed a Site Improvement Performance Bond in the amount of $4,000.00 on behalf of Jabil. Development Corp. A copy of the bond is enclosed. Would you please advise if our liability may be terminated on the aforesaid bond, and the date of termination, in order that we may close our file. Please refer to our bond number in your reply. Sincerely, UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY Liz J��a Viki Fossell Fidelity & Surety Department enc. UNI-i ED %3AClFIC INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE / Rp: Permit N 4 i PrAjdCt 12-UNIT APARTMENT HOUSE SITE AT 1115 I'OUR1rH SOUTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON y •' CITY OF EDMONDS, WRSHINGTON SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE JABIL DEVELOPME141' CORPORATION owner 4s Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC -INSURANCE COMPANY bonding company •a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of WASHINGTON , are held and firmly bound unto the,City of Edmonds, Wash ngton, in the sum of FOUR THOUSAND($4,000.00) dollars, the payment of which we, firmly bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest jointly and severally. THE COND;TIONS OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the amount of the bond set forth hereinabove has been.determined by submission by the developer or owner of the property affected to the Building Department a cost estimate of the -'improvements based on the approved site plan.. That such estimate has been reviewed by the building official who has set the amount of.the' performanc9 bond; 2. Upon the satisfactory installation and completion of the required site improve- ments, as evidenced by the written approval of the Building Department, the developer. or owner shall maintain a Performance Bond or similar security to guarantee.the main- tenance of the required site improvements for a period of one (1) year from the date of said approval, which bond or similar security shall be ten per cent (10%) of the principal amount set forth on.the face of this bond; , 3. Both principal and bonding company hereby agree that in the event the owner or developer fails to complete the indicated improvements within 12 months, that the City of Edmor.3s may demand that the improvements be installed or completed immediately to -City standards. Upon the failure of the owner or developer to complete said improvements within the time period set forth, and after demand from the City of Edmonds, the City may proceed to have said improvements installed and/or completed and the principal and bonding company agree that the.funds for payment -to the limits of this bond shall bedelivered within ten (10) days of receipt of demand for payment ,thereof and the City may proceed directly against this bond for.payment without first compelling payment by the owner or d'eveloper..,, to The term of this bond shall be from MAY 11 ,197 a MAY 11 197 9 JABIL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION C untersi ned:�' S RA CE COMPA NITED (bondi g COm any) J. L. MCDONALD ` Acce ted:- CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON By .Bu lding Official (owner or developer) UNITED P GIFIC NSf? C-, .0 PANY BY: 'j 2_��Ij-�• bonding CO pany 0 E.• McG Y, ATTORNEY-IN-FI A -k,;404� - S � SIT FILE JUN 6 1979 UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY ll;,. u1 iuOilC NUfi•S Home Office - Tacoma, Washington To be attached to and form part of Bond Number U 06 31 65 executed by JABIL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION as Principal, and UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, as Surety, in favor of CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON and dated MAY 11, 1978. In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is hereby agreed that: THE BOND TERM IS EXTENDED UNTIL: MAY 11, 1980 The attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements, limitations and conditions except as herein expressly modified. This rider shall become effective as of the llth day of May, 1978, standard time: ACCEPTED: CITY OF EMONDS, WASHINGTON BY: Signed, sealed and dated this 5TH day of JUNE 1979. JABIL DEVELOPMENT CORPORRATION BY: fir-- f�✓� UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY BY: , OHN E. McGARRY, TTOP.NEY-IN-FACT (Title) FILE y CITY OF EDMONDS ' CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020205) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' June 30, 1981 Jabil Development Corporation P.O. Box 1582 Lynnwood, WA 98036 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR SUBJECT: 12 UNIT APARTMENT @ 1115 4TH AVENUE S.; PERMIT #810244 On June 25, 1981 the City Attorney reviewed the City's procedures and code sections regarding building permit renewals. As part of his findings, he noted that your project at the above address is not renewable under UBC Section 303 and Section 19.00.010 of the City of Edmonds Code. Therefore under the provisions of UBC 303 (e), permit #810244 is revoked effective immediately. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $433.00 refunding your permit fees. If there are any questions, or if you desire assistance in applying for a new permit for the project, please contact the Building Division. Harold Reeves Building Official HR/cn enclosure certified 9 - 1 0 FILE June 26, 1981 MEMO TO: Conni Curtis Accounts Payable Clerk FROM: Cindy Noack Building Secretary SUBJECT: REFUND Please make a check out in the amount of $433.00, payable to Jabil Development Corporation. The City Attorney has advised us that this permit is not renewable and therefore it should be void and the money is to be refunded. The money was charged to Building Permit Fees, 322.10-00. Please send the check to me when it is ready, I will then send it on to the owner. Concurrence: Harold Reeves Building Official STU"IEET FILE June 15, 1981 MEMO TO: Conni Curtis Accounts Payable Clerk FROM: Cindy Noack Building Secretary SUBJECT: REFUND Please make a check out in the amount of $183.00, payable to Mr. Frank Taylor. Due to an error in calculating a renewal fee for his building permit at 1115 4th Avenue South, he was overcharged this amount. The money was charged to Building Permit Fees, 322.10-00. Please send the check to me when it is ready since I have to send a cover letter to Mr. Taylor. Concurrence: �, CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT N O T I C E TO: Jabil Development P.O. Box 1582 Lynnwood, WA RE: BUILDING PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS: DATE OF ISSUANCE: June 10, 1980 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 790269 1115 4th Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 6-13-79 This letter is to advise you that the Building Division files do not indicate recent inspections for the subject Building Permit. The job card issued for posting at the job site lists the schedule of inspections required for your reference and convenience. If no progress has been made on construction, please advise the Building Division so that appropriate notation can be made in the file. The initial Building Permit is valid for one year, therefore, if construction is not completed within one year from the date of issuance of the permit, a renewal is required. Your cooperation in this matter to assure compliance with the Edmonds Building Code is encouraged. Harold Reeves Acting Building Official HR / rm L-,�ET FILE 0 CITY OF E®MON®IS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , July 30, 1979 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Jabil Development Corp. P.O. Box 1582 Lynnwood, Wa. 98036 PERMIT #790269 - 1115-4th AVENUE SOUTH This is in answer to your letter of July 25, 1979. The UPC, section 401, limits the use of ABS or PVC installations to not more than two stories in height. Any request for a waiver of this requirement should be.directed to the City Board of Appeals. An application is enclos6d, which should be filed before August 9th for the meeting of August 20th. Harr Whitcutt Y Building Official HMW/ae. enclosure � Ic-EET FILE JABIL DEVELOPN9L--.NIT CORP. P. O. BOX 1582 LYNNWOOD, WA. 98036 my 25, 1979 Harry Whitcutt /� Building Official City of Edmonds Edmonds, Washington Re: Taylor Apartments (12Units) 1115 4th So. Edmonds, Washington Permit # 780343 Renewal 790269 Dear Mr. Whitcutt, We are in the process of starting our twelve unit apartment house located in Ldmonds. Our apartment house is quite small, three stories with four units on each story. Due to this, we are requesting a waver` from the code section requiring the use of cast iron pipe for plumbing in this apartment building and substituting ABS pipe. Your consideration in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, uth Miller Project Manager Jabil Development Corp. BILE 46 • . L lop. FILE # 8L 348 FORA FOR [ftW=/FIN-U] DECLE`1tATION OF [)8K1R/1NONSIGi iIFIONI CE] UQ Description of 12 UNIT APARTMENT proposal . NOV Proponent Frank Taylor Location of Proposal 1115 4th Avenue South Lead Agency. City of Edmonds 3his proposal has been dct:ermi.ned to *%Ryz/not have] a significant a:3- verse irpact upon -die envirori,icnt. An EIS Wis not] required tun er RG1 4.3.21C.030(2) (c) . Tni.s decision was radc after reviev, by the lead agency of a completed envirmriental chec1dist and other inforriation on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Mary Lou Block Position/Title Associate City Planner Date June 6, 1978 SignaturvL" vs[ , N 5.4 vij&N X08- _X_�7d DESCRIPTIONOF PP,OPO5S —&ieD 12 .vt;t� ,14�'T-f� _ 780343 PROPONENT: -Fl-?4A/k TyjtD0 V �_ ET FILE EXISTING USE: VAc*Nr LO>r — ZMJS RMH +6 ALRE ENVIRO;,:."EFJTAL I"?PACTS FR0`1 PROPOS,",L: SOILS/TOPOGRAPHY - Land S/.joss iat�- �° West' -mAnvsl I sls s•,ls d�9rea .f /•�,� � oas as Pt-v Ae�� vm eeem /N9 v� a✓c.adratrt-Ah stvssmt / wq tier•1a l k, JAM PA✓0YAzS/oPe. WATER/DRAINAGE AppArewt TPr61 1PPk• ff ViSIj� Fol"��K wtdY.0 yj q/Qas or gpr►,h9s. 4dJace+�ct IaKd Inas cat ample apF^ *K+IN koas no peo (o%P n� iu� f �, i k eea . I JJ AIR QUALITY - Auty eMj5SIo14s— j� vkihsx 4 '�'�PS/day = 4$ �Ps. Tra��i� w,l �enJe a t. �o 44�S. Ts wvt,vhi v� �A�f%� CIRCULATION - �FGLw „ MAY have some a 00% v, o4 rt-e ss " o� It t' ot ve He iq �af koa . �}uess v �0 5y'` PN� so �-it�s sk,uul 4fMc-ke w&osi�' of �� // / VEGETATIOfJ - q AK) 4r, bladZlirryj �ratSps � u�Ge�s. /YD dnade or ��Piie(y mid I eA-mJ. d I� tt ECO"�0'9I C Shovld vjde St�,�!'� osj� oe 'MPa`+ OK J60`4U1p Lo11MOh,�s, �i nt or �' a c Le►� JU,Ii re vlre -t xAAS/opt W s{ MJ"A'K CITY SERVICES - 4. a �1,Ca,^t, �►�er W"Vey-le1e 4vA-41bfe, f�' 1 ENVI P,ON,IENTAL FINDI;d�S : l�There will be certain environmental impacts but they do not constitute a si oni f- icant adverse impact on the environment and no environmental impact statement will be required. There will be s i gni fi cant adverse i i, pacts on the environment and an envi ron,:,enta ; impact statement will be- requi red. There 1.vi l l be certain impacts on the environment however it is necessary to obtai more information before a declaration of significance or non -significance is made A, j /Z, - //, CITY PLANNE-R DA E CITY ElIGINEER DATE F/A ' 76 21 3 4I S+ 7 9 10 11 12 13, 141, 15! 16' 17 18 19 20 21� 22 23, 24 25 26 27 28 29 301 31' 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47' 48i 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 �ADB S fig. S7 FII F DATE: / �Zl/`yL77 780343 A► $25 fee will be collected by the City of Edmonds for analysis of the Environmental Checklist and the preparation of a Threshold Ddtermination. No fee will be charged for proposals which would be categorically exempt if they were not located in an environ- mentally sensitive area. ENVIRON,',1 EL'TAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent_ F I'Z(, k7iiq loll' 2. Address andL Phone Number of Proponent: 3. Date Checklist SubrlittecF2111,/77 4. Agency Requiring ChecklisC 01- Yyi0" _S 5. Dame of Proposal, if applicable:' 112 "i.r A-P/*a-zI►elu ii o� 6. Nat:ure and Brief Description o flip Proposal (includ- ing but not limited to its size, ;;encral desi,.n ele- ments, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): .j� S'izy"r� t� � �-ty '" uu t f- 7. ation of i'r0E:osat uescri e t, e p .v's setting; of oc the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by .nny environmental impacts, including any other in[ormation needed to give an accurat-, understand- ing of the environmental setting of the proposal): 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposed Action: 9. Li.st of all Permits, Licenses or Govcrit:itent Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local -- including rezones): -31- 'w. 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 221 23 24', 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any p ans y of ers wni c i may a ect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other app ication form that has been com- pleted regarding the proposal; if none has been com- pleted, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. E2NIMTXENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No (1) Larch. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? _ (c) Change in topography or ground x surface relief features? _ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of'any unique geologic or physical features? _ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ (f) Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed'of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ExpInnation:. N/1�Y1►muiYn a w�q �r � 4 (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: < (a) Air emissions or deterioration X of ambient air quality? _ (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change its c'imate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: ,� p^I- E±aeo_�D +r, ring A-i•y. 32 ��f' Cods \1! I1 LL9e 1=Jr�Ml�s llJ h? of et-rXi 4 Pw aX4 1' 2. 3 4. 5� 6 71 8 91 101 111 12i 131 141 151 161 17' 18 19 20 21, 22 ' 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 • ��, Yes F No (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? e (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? w (d) Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration -of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water qualir.y, either through direct in- jection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? _ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Explanation: © -OLe (ar- +p. 3 - M&i p� niJ APP� �u�;ir uc, ��P1 (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including; trees, shrubs, grass, crops, mi_croflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? — -33- X M L M RECEIVED PROJE40ME ' DEC 19 1977 DATE SUBIPIITTED CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT In order to meet the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, the responsible official must make a declaration of environmental impact as early as possible in the process of evaluating a project. The information in this form will be used to determine whether it will be necess- ary to require an environmental impact statement. If an impact statement is not required, a Statement of I'legative Declaration will be placed in the file. If an impact statement is required, a draft statement must be filed with this office, public notice given and a review period of 30 days allovied. The final statement and comments must be filed with the Department of Ecology, Office of the Governor and the Ecological Commission. The Edmonds Planning Staff will assist you in any way vie can in accumulating this information and we would appreciate your cooperation. 1. Land: Area in acres Soils type A.C."L�1.1 Limitations Description of topography (% slope) _�2 �,S -7 _ ` Grading: estimated cubic yds. goo dLa NOTE: If grading or filling viilT exceed 500 cubic yards Filling: estimated cubic yds. ___-__ a grading and filling plan must be submitted with the 2. Water: application. Stream - estirated flour (cubic feet per second) _ A Will stream be altered? A/14 To what degree? Impact on storm drainage (increase in run-off) � e- Estimated area . to be paved ate, Es ti mated area in open space _7�bg` Shorelines: within 200 ft. of Mean Higher High Water Adjacent to shorelines zone Environmental Assessment, page 2 3. Vegetation: Type of trees __ — p_ % to be removed to© Minimum diameter of trees to remain Ground cover &„ JV % to be removed f Ego Proposed landscaping, if any a/ _ r1 L �jk WnV -Irt'e 4. Existing Land Use within 300 ft. radius of proposed development: Vacant Single Famil y Multi - Family Comm. Other North p/ South East Wes t ✓ 5. Circulation: Estimated increase in auto trips daily Estimated demand for public transportation ___rA )tj ,tea Degree of change on adjacent streets imp-rak.dZOE -¢ 6. Area of impact: neighborhood city-wide regional 7. Effect on air Duality: __ A14 8. Changes in noise generation:_ "Z`; P-A Sr BEET FILE people of the church that the shrubs would have to be replanted on the Bell St. side. MR. SPANFELNER MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. KINDERFATHER, TO APPROVE ADB-57-81 WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE SHRUBS BE RELOCATED TO CONCEAL THE RAMP IF POSSIBLE. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-58-81 FRANK TAYLOR - Review of site, elevations and landscaping for 12-unit condominium at 1115 4th Ave. S. (RM-1.5) This site is on the east side of 4th Ave., sloping upward from 4th Ave. The building will be built into the hill, with the main entrance on the second level. It will be oriented westward, with the entrance ` ;; l� to the east. Most of the parking will be to the rear of the site, with 12 covered parking stalls. There is a required rear yard setback of 15' for structures, but Mr. Bowman indicated the staff would support a setback adjustment to allow the parking structure. The trash enclosure is on the -north property line and is to be screened by a 6' high cedar fence with gates. Electrical meters will be on the southeast corner I 1 of the building. The building and carport will be tan stucco with Alwood D earthtone trim. The building will have asphalt shingle roofing the have landscape and carport will a gravel roof. The plan appeared adequate except for the hornbeams and vine maples at the rear of the site which grow to 35'- 40', and at such heights they would block the views of units to the east. No identification sign was proposed and the lighting plan was not shown. Planning/Engineering Inspector Dan Smith indicated that the site plan was acceptable to the Ejnee_�ina Divislon exce t that an 18' will be required instead of the propose . Also, a sidewalk must be installed along 4th Ave. S., to City standards. Other standard Engineering requirements will be imposed. A lady in the audience asked whether this building would be higher than the adjacent Stella d'Ora, and she was told it would be lower. Mr. Mitchell questioned the objection to the vine maple trees, saying you can see right through them even with leaves on them. He said possibly some kind of hawthorne could be used in place of the hornbeams. MR. MITCHELL MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HERMAN, T P�PROVE ADB-58-81 AS SUBMITTED BUT THAT THE HORNBEAMS BE REPLACED WITH A SMALLER GROWING TREE WHICH CAN GO BACK TO THE ADB ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. A short recess was announced. ADB-6�0 $1� TIME OIL COMPANY - Review of gasoline service station and convenience store at 2232TRighway 99 (CG) The applicant was seeking final approval for site, elevations, landscaping, and sign. The location is the northwest corner of 224th and Highway 99 and requires the removal of an existing service station. The site layout appeared adequate but Mr. Bowman noted several items that must be corrected: (1) There is to be no landscaping in the Highway 99 right-of-way, so the planter area along the east property line must stop at the right-of-way and have a curb at this point. The existing curbing in the right-of-way must be removed. (2) There will be curbs and sidewalks along the south property line. (3) A 15' wide, fully landscaped setback is required from all streets and was not shown. (4) The curb cut along Highway 99 must be reduced to not more than 30'. It was noted that a covenant will be required in support of any future sidewalk LID on Highway 99. The building will be concrete block, tan in color, with an extending mansard covered with aluminum "rough shakes," colors to be red, orange, and yellow. The front elevation will be primarily plate glass, with aggregate plywood below the windows. The pump island will be supported by two poles with an overall height of 14 1/2', with a mansard covering to match the building. Mr. Bowman noted that the proposed landscaping did not appear adequate as the species proposed and the spacing would not allow a fully developed appearance within two years. No trees were proposed. He further noted that a 15' setback from the RM property to the west was required which was to be landscaped and permanently maintained with trees and ground cover, and that a minimum 6' high fence, wall or solid hedge must be provided. A 6' cyclone fence with no slats was proposed. Mr. Bowman said the landscaping in this area would not provide the required buffer. No sprinkler system was shown ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 4 - September 2, 1981 F CITY OF EDMONDS APPT.TCATTnN to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD DATE 8/.11)2/81 FILE 0 p�•� SITE PLAN_ LO-1*1 BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA 1/ RECEIPT # SIGN EXHIBITS FEE RECPT # PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: 76 3 HEARING DATE OW:dER/REPRESENTATIVE Frank Taylor PHONE 778-4511 ADDRESS P.O. Box 1582, Lynnwood, Washington ZIP CODE 98o36 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Robert E. Young & Assoc. PHONE 542-3192 PROPERTY ADDRESS 4th Ave., S. ZONING RM-1 .5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION West 150.0' of Lot 6, Block 1 , South Park Addition, Edmonds, Washington PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 1. Building Plans - Preliminary Final X Site Plan X Landscape Plan X Elevations X 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 3 Story, 12-unit Condominium APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT Spring - 1982 ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK Nine ( 9 ) months RELEASE/HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages -and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys; fees, arising from any action or inaction of the City whenever such action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. PERMISSION TO ENTER SUBJECT PROPERTY: The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its per- mission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. I. (Signature.of Applic nt) �1 J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971,Chapter 43.21C•, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the next question. • • �' • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND '' ^^ 1. Name of Proponent -�� 7-A L�F- 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent P o, xl L y#-4 N WCDP WA V 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist C•t'T'-( O t E•P/Y ot} D5 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable NJ. A 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: 1. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): © N e1 �_ Z WIT 12(, F `PZk) b LL ( N <r_? �"�-� -jl� 12�c'7 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal LA 1 v l 8 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N0 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. UO 12. Attach any other proposal; if none some future date, application form that has been completed, describe the nature L has been completed regarding the but is expected to be filed at of such application form: A 1 T AWb] 6 Tro LO -1- 0 YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ✓ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? t/ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? V h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? V i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ✓ Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? c/ d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? Explanation: -3- t B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? f/ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ✓ d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? c/ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ✓ Explanation: 7MHRI(A rz: D Q (I I �J6 e5b L�! 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? -2- YES 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the ocation, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? J Explanation: (,vt U, & Piz Pb()u LAITi nL ) ►'1'S MMGU(A 6 VrC',N U 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing oTi using, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Ll,)r (_ A�t� 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? V f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: L u N 1 T -5- YES MAYBE S. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase ex— Ling noise levels? Explanation: i > ay ,,O 'P.--L) NO 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: MMi i 10 tJA 20a -7-0 'Eu1L21 ; Po ccJ S. Land Use. Will the proposal result n the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9.� Natural Resources. Will the proposal result n: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: -4- s _s• YES MAYBE r 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? Explanation: NO 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ✓ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? c/ Explanation: a 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need ne—eed new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: -6- M YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result n the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result n the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ✓ Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an a teration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • ENT: I/ -7- 0 S}':>:e€T FILE August 27, 1981 MEMO TO: ADB Members FROM: Dan Smith Planning/Engineering Inspector SUBJECT: ADB MEETING/SEPTEMBER 2, 1981 The following items have received no comment: ADB-55-81/S & S Sign Company ADB-56-81/Steve Walter ADB-59-81/John Delane ADB-61-81/Pizza Hut ADB-6-81/Art Furbush ADB-62-81/Claire's Pantry ADB-63-81/Rebecca Strom ADB-58-81 FRANK TAYLOR Review of site, elevations and landscaping for twelve unit condominium at 1115 4th Avenue South. (RM-1.5) The site plan as presented is acceptable to Engineering excepts -for one..change. A 18' driveway will be required in place of the proposed 161. Also, a sidewalk must be installed along 4th Avenue South to City standards. At time of building permit application, a development plan must be submitted showing all planned utility systems and public improvements. A performance bond will have to be posted based upon the cost of installation of the utilities and any public improvements. _ADB-60-80 TIME OIL COMPANY Review o gasoline service station and convenience store at 22324 Highway 99. The site plan is acceptable except for two changes. A 30' curb cut will be the maximum allowed on the Highway 99 entrance. Also, curb, gutter and sidewalk will have to be extended along the south property line. A utilities development plan, cost estimate and performance bond based on 110% of this cost estimate shall be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Also, Time Oil Company is required to sign a covenant supporting.any future sidewalk L.I.D. on Highway 99. ADB-63-81 REBECCA STROM Review of site, elevations, -landscaping and signs for California Concept's Hair Design at 533 Dayton Street. (BC) The site design as presented is acceptable. The use of the alleyway for access to parking and backout space is approved by the City Engineering office. A utilities development plan, cost estimate and performance bond based on 110% of this estimate shall be required prior to issuance of building permit: DS/mt I 42 / `0 d i'i. 0 STREET FILE DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT N N WHEREAS, are the owncrs of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to -wit: LV .5a+:}�1�+R�C .%dd��t�+rt ZU Z-A4*7%0Jl9S 11HE.;EAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 11.02.036 of the Edmonds City Code. WITNESSETII: that for 'and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed or the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housingmay be erected on subject property containing more than 1-2-units. cs� r � DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT - 1 ' M227023( i• r - t Said covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, Successors and assigns. DATED this _� day of 1977 Grantor—� Grantor w STATE OF It'ASH I NGTON ) ss. ,< COUNTY OF SNOIIO1MI SH ) On this day personally appeared before me and a,# to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ,r they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, x for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I•� . Y GIVEN under my hand and official seal this w� day of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at _ ;w DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT - 2 ' '712270236 `- C eY•�� C ITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS f " CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, Sec. 306 42-5/-t. 0 At 1115 Fourth Avenue South u Occupancy established by this certificate: R - 1 M - 1 Building Permit Number #850461 Fire Zone I No. Stories 3 Type Const. V — 1 Hour I Basement t Floor Load signs in place (per Sec. 23o8 U.B.C.) — Capacity signs posted (per Sec. 3301 (i) U.B.C.) Floor load and room capacity signs, when required, roust remain posted at all times. Twelve Unit Apartment TFIE HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED AS COMPLYING WITH l PROVISIONS OF THE EDMONDS BUILDING CODE AND WITH UNIFORM BUILDING CODES. E- • Issued this __1Welft.fL __ _clay of June 1986 CH1EF BUILDING OFFICIAL. By v }4n�� , r ` • �^�- rThis certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and shall be main- ,;, Lained in legible condition at all times. Any change of occupancy requires a new certificate. •- � r � ?,� ' �. ,. �' � � z �C� `� � SQL" ?.�. ��SO �;�' ,,,rll��il-5��',�- % �`. h . f' 9, �� _ ,' U �l�Y�'`I /� RM PROJECT CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME: cl-A 41,,,5 /Z aV1114of CONTACT PERSON: IN041 e i lflWJ441 PROJECT ADDRESS: ///S ///"�- /4y 5�%4C/IL PHONE NUMBER: Sy6-639-5' PLANNING Date Sent: Date Returned: Zone: 5- ADB No.: Cond. Use #: Variance: Other: -z ENGINEERING Date Sent: 7-2- Site Plan/Development Plan: Drainage Plan Bond Cost Estimates: Environmental Checklist: Landscape Plan: Date Returned: (2 copies) (2 copies) COMMENTS: 7� PVgl&K K�-kt/SlaV SYS✓ /:1� L 41111�)6 S/�ec�•�-/ D/c' �io.�c Sri �.qir� FIRE Date Sent: Date Returned: CO/ 2—F4,5 Memo Sent to Developer/Owner:,✓- COMMENTS: FlMIL 61yll,�6 BUILDING Permit & Plans Submitted: Legal Description Checked: L.I.D. Checked: Sent to Plan Check: ,�c o 0,266 `% (date) Returned: riec (da Plan Checker: (name)<o� Clcres �' COMMENTS: Rudy BONDS Date informed: 7 II 9S Estimates approved: kc, ow/► 41hue Performance Bond: $ ly,000 fojU8 I -SS Date Released: DATE PERP1IT ISSUED: o- av �Dl�i✓Cdtecic QG�a-t<f-.� ��O.Ga Maintenance Bond: $ 1sao&e66d7/4/. Date Released�� PERMIT NO: FINAL APPROVAL: (date) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: (581 Awaao ✓ /.yrl 8� g�3 �l Cyr b/.,✓� �'SOy3' lt/C d ?/-8s ENV„ LT ',y E.�. 'j ; .• ! , i•l I r�. �e7, �4t0 ,. 'i 'i 5 �•; . CE. [<'•Q�✓FeW hi\{N•":.'t��1Wj ipE�• � t Ntlrl�n` } ,. r .4 S�!�.�+��"� „�STAUCTiI�N ; PERMIr ,-APKId t .•s.--•ir r• An01 E j .,• 7 t i �L.. 1.4 `/j i • t' f �..'• rh ES s'Yli•7 . ''N�� r.,r :r ...,a ' Y g itt ow+eaAl In titxl u.i t ayu :r �y, fi.. K' ouN� � 91 wwr d awr Some .tlopalgo ' � m�rwawr.aaput�tepa t • tr• � f _ - rEu;nroHE nlsarEn Ira ail°nl�i�trul° dSltEp•� �' ;• ri a'�i�1 �!! ItrT tlpL ttll� M CgCa Lw MTf - p r r k • i I, i , . a�r , ii �i t�.i I s_ . • t li ! i 1 S r ,' t i j' i �'i1 . rRnl•at[!! aYlDwO ••UlitaE' i -,. tI, ' Yl 17Tr . TEaEM0/ra INIIaEa . _� _ _ aurrar aft ,taYrq . r r ± t 1 r F, II � i .:. � �Eaarata `• ' k I I! 'r. J, i 1 F i., �� }4', tCOMI l.IMma, _•4 GM1llc[Nta Warm t4kn'e-b2k At S �•�s LaYU o y • Inoluoa�ll aaaamanls AttONtO .w0!aEe . onlm ;p� Mr?. � ,. r f C t 7t 1 ,'ri.,i 141 -71 • . ¢blr ttato� /x attach foug t:dplaa) .. ' • • MS, a , g S"'s' i t // �yj� !' �`��r,.±,t1, Hw•> ;i+t r.: 'I+.'., ri7 r'fi i• U' L�.iOr U.M1Ld1 .: I_ t- �•p. t ;r.. L.. •+ . .; ,;,� a .h ^ ar, tv t (� �•.. ig OrtilM NO E,�1 Aoou�tol' . r1o+rlEaloEHnAt ❑ •uEt7tNrex Aare! ,'' ?.. , r r - a ,r {t •; ❑, r, �': ON MLLI '_.—,� •' Kip . ' ' '�- • j : Hoe+ti � :-Ep! ! � , I , ., t •t ,r rwt+lovE umri llfrtY '�. i • vim. M + , �•`, r , Vi:.•? .. 1,50 NAWILI l:' Q1 ' Q ' ' �. rr• ow' ttttw. !'E u1 'r tno! nerltal w�ttn uwe ,�. � .. +. 7 r • i .•ti �` f I+Tr. i'', r , a . ❑ ' ❑- 1Kul r (480 ~ ` L�Q.•' ' r .`• 'y , i.Sf • ..del or tnpwas. MUII ,� ., . .:p . �;'` -,•;;.5 .wart o'.loaa TO K ool+a tATTACM /Lpf NAMrim •r'� i . �' I-": 's, f r'` t' •r'i'` r - PLAM,OIECtif R[. . Too ilarllut oows work Any to be oona do private prdparty ON construction L amaanrru '.. r. '� • ' ' • ,) :•`'' 1 j., 1, . -••`' •(; r an the tna twill r ouir s µamte akfw►alka, .. '� ' ., .. a'a. alalpyafr< ateJ twill rputn aaparata parmlaalOn. I. tti"'"Aoollcation1Wpaya.: Look t rwr-P/wbW Work Is Startao WIMIn.1ti0 � •-AmYtalt; On Oanarf of nla a ttK apotrta, Mlrs; IDafpna ir10 r � atropaaapra in IntaMt, tp Indatnrify; Aaltrlo YW'JgM j' lhoom omme the .City. of t�lnaws.. waW�gtm. no offclat Iaaa rrw, atiaMa from fury and w l.4ima fa r1�Yf !{'S�` r«; allraaaly aapni, uWam M Wrh or Inplraettr frogs tM taattarrtii. - • ' • .. '�.. '� ' } • xA ' • . �!'ttr` PoiErLL taaunpa of tMa'P"l a" 'mt. be Oaagrltif • Mory..akl. or reduce any rpuk.mam of any City i=r • .. , t, 1. f r [� y1 A;g t .Pea M* to "iny OW tM OWS "ty to anforoo any.oldMliyy. // • ie Fnr•io�,. - .. ; TQTAL AMq/EtT:pUE • ' i f i t i r1- ,wtrt �a}y t 1 .^ mbr-b-AwW g— I fleae mW tfW Opftaft,; U+aI tlrt r +, r s+ ti. +i�'•' l,�U.'r'm% r! t 0 m a and EIYt I am no ovrwc « EM Ady i �•� APP�.i�(i�'�r�y�. • 4 i , i A woo.aPM to Cot11p1y. arms chi MO .' t I r ' • i';.• . 'r tttltaMtr, a0N be bM1 agW M 00Yq tlyspli ® - TNa +LMad EI�a>tattad �DtoYad M rlotatlon of tflt TIC ' mWadd by Ura �itp odd* �l.r, •, � 1 ;,'r -fk' ' -1•4` tNattYrtpbn twatYtp to y�b/17rl�n 0 wowit rE1{ ^-•s;.'p, .. ."°rm . •OapMyatitdMaaat E-tEItl��rll.r rAL, } ' •'9vy - Y nt!W!rllElgf ... 1:. ,. i -! .+: + I , li (��''g5' s� ,..t�: d � • _ fit'?, `' y1� OEyy OF ` olnen7tMMa1a� „e• t !- !"rL..wlfi,p:. R1 �pyp� •> i '�-'A. • y ,`ajV'1�t .: ',;'. .: t`•: 17'tJ7pZ 'i' oat' , �r .t. •� f{e } •` � r.. INC --_r- •,,�,VW'A•1LdtW OR3TgUCTU1 �L• 7 rY ;T•'t'.liy.;•;` wBUM OPAWaM UM . AEroA�P,?w_r_vAtop' ,G; spy ,. `i .. • r/�4Sa-d: �.-rtjD�trir. 00 D�'at U. led ;?�'I Sr'o.a.�,��I' 1r ;� •' �; rd J � r leg � , + 6l jt. {� f'i lk��d.4'•i� ,.�,r(I. -,,' •: ten. _� 1•J t r.y�r ; i��w"{1.l ��tlf!-"ji<Sr�t n<•I�7T Tr I: j��,y. . fii!'. t / •� g't x.•-� �`�'�t,�4�t:. $ tfi .`N'1t xS" ,,� ,r7` t,`. 1 4 y ss x :�`�q�.�' S�^' } '+`e if � .g `✓�- Y� _� ,._ ^- 3-4�:- }g'"u,{t' ^,y x Y v .9 -------------- � ` �� ✓�T�, :',. �,s*� Y��,, ! TS _ �`+-� `fit � . : �— - +�.'�, �S NO pa �' - � �? � � .� � -,r• �.�E �'��;� �'-'+� %i.- '�� '�uv ,�': � yb. a*s �wri�si`.�C'�s�?:� } x .. 0 t-i" O = 2 = ' N ; FYI _ N 0 rrCil0 s rT. � r O C Y� t Cn DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT , WHEREAS, Y.ONTAVO ASSOCIATES are the owners of the following described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit: THE WEST1Ot0 feet of lot 6, block 1, South Park Addition to edmonds, According to the plat acorded in Vol. 8 of plats, Pg 13, Records of Snohomish County, Wa. Situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution or this Covenant the Grantors have agreed or the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family .housing may be erected on subject property containing more than 12 units. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVE'IENT - i VOL 1982 PAGE 1771 8607250 a 0 Said covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. DATED this day of Arantor" Ate 96 /va or STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me �. &N�J and to me known to be the individual/ described in and who executed within the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of 19�• .., ��t � • '.;yam•, ' Lary P�bi�naor t e Stat of Washington, residing at MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 6,16#89. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENENT - 2 VOL 1982PAGEi7V. 8607250286 .890 19y- CITY OF EDMONDS 250-5th AVE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering September 13, 1988 Diane M. Adams Aurora Village Branch Seafirst Bank 1121 North 205th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 RE: Clouston 12 Unit Apartment 1115 4th Avenue South Permit #850461 Maintenance Bond $1,500.00 LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The City of Edmonds hereby authorizes the release of the maintenance bond for the 12 unit apartment located at 1115 4th Avenue South for Monte Clouston. All interested City departments have inspected the site and approved the bond for release. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, - Jeannine L. Gr Permit Coordinator cc: Monte Clouston • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan BOND RELEASE FORM 7 CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISON DATE: Z� TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-DAN SMITH PLANNING DIVISION-BRb /&611 - I�LS FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator PERMIT #: F,5_04I ADB # AY'�__L51 PLAT # PROJECT ADDRESS: ! //s DEVELOPER CILOUS%Z)A✓ %Z W1r /Prr TYPE OF BOND TO BE .RELEASED 4W,0 --/yR,-Vj_ $ BOND DATE POSTED C% z_3 D�6 BOND EXPIRES L?12-31yy Please inspect for the release of the bond. If there are outstanding requirements please advise in the space provided. BOND APPROVED FOR RELEASE% DATED_'��'t '-Z)� BOND NOT APPROVED SEE OUTSTANDING REQUIREMENTS DATED r 0 BOND RELEASE FORM CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISON DATE: Y Z3—V TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-DAN SMITH 1-*� PLANNING DIVISION-BRUCE FINKE FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator PERMIT #: 85()g6 I ADB # PLAT # PROJECT ADDRESS: %�/S 'v /� S DEVELOPER ( 101 Sr01V 12- Gw/r AVF TYPE OF BOND TO BE RELEASED %�'I�9r�✓r l�� r BOND DATE POSTED % Z3 Z BOND EXPIRES 23 A& Please inspect for the release of the bond. If there are outstanding requirements please advise in the space provided. d } } � -1. BOND APPROVED FOR RELEASE k',;'�lr' DATED_ �' ! BOND NOT APPROVED SEE OUTSTANDING REQUIREMENTS DATED CITY OF EOMONOS 250 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES DATE: 9- t 8 - 8 (.. ATTENTION: BUILDING DIVISION RE: Edmonds File No.: ?rL � Developer/Contractor: AUo Pa6CIP,-m S I:M9rMN C Project Address: k% S - OL MO Gentlemen: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR With reference to the above -identified matter, this will certify that this institution has a savings account (or loan) for the above -referenced developer for the project so identified. In consideration of the permitted development of the property, and in lieu of a performance bond, this institution hereby agrees that it will freeze the following sums of money for the indicated site improvements pending written authorization for release of said funds by the City of Edmonds: $ 1500.00 The total sum indicated will be withheld by this institution from any disbursements of any kind until written authorization' has been received by the institution for the City of Edmonds to release the sum of money indicated by the written authorization from the City. The design, location, materials and other specifications for the indicated site improvements are those required by the City of Edmonds as appear in the above -referenced Edmonds file and in compliance with Ordinance No. 1620 of said City. In the event the developer/owner fails to complete the indicated improvements within-,-7# (weeks/months), the City of Edmonds may demand, and the institution shall make, payment to the City of said funds so that the improvements can be installed or completed immediately to City standards. The institution shall not be liable to the owner for any disbursement of said funds to the City of Edmonds. It is hereby specifically agreed by and between the parties hereto that in the event that any legal action must be taken to enforce the provisions of this bond or to collect said bond, that the prevailing party shall be entitled to collect its cost and reasonable attorneys' fees as a part of the reasonable costs of securing the obligation hereunder. In the event of settlement or resolution of these issues, prior to the filing of any suit, the actual costs incurred by the City, including reasonable attorneys' fees, shall be considered a paxt of the obligation hereunder secured. Said costs and reasonable legal fees shall be recoverable by the prevailing party, not only from the proceeds of this bond but also over and above said body as a part of any recovery in any judicial proceeding, in addition to recovery on the bond. CITY OF EDMONDS PER.FOR',W4CT POND Page --1- SeaFirst Bank -- (IME OF BANK) Senior Customer Service ---- (TITLE) Aurora Village Branch 1121 N. 205th, Seattle, Wa. 98133 (BANK ADDRESS) STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHCVJSH) APPROVED: Moh,�V 0 AffOctq'I�S UP;VET,OPFJER ACCEPTED: _� q�2_3� ITY OF EDMOND PERM -IT COORDINATOR DATE: 9-18-86 On this 18th day of September ,: 19jK before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fore the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Monte Clouston , TO ME KNOWN TO;P. BE THE General Partner Of Montavo Associates , the m � that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledqecl the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said , for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. afT, W 0� t�JIas o 0 0 C in and for in, residing a '), e -q0. CITY OF EDMONDS PERFORMANCE BOND Page -2- • COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION DATE: Z' 2-5- TO: FIRE DEPARTMENT —67111Zy A660410S ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SUBJECT: Cleus'Fy PERMIT: S15D 16j Please review and advise any outstanding requirements on the above permit, in order that they may be given final approval and a Certificate of Occupancy issued. BUILDING NOV 3 -1986 Hal Reeves Building Official HR: j lg 11 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES September 23rd, 1986 Monte Clouston 22415 Woodway Park Road Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: Clouston 12 Unit Apartment 1115 Fourth Avenue South Permit #850461 Performance Bond Release LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The City is in receipt of the required two year maintenance bond in the amount of $1,500.00. The City of Edmonds hereby authorizes the release of the $10,000 performance bond, all interested City departments have reviewed the subject project and approved release of the site improvement items. Enclosed is your Certicate of Occupancy. If you have any questions please feel free to call on me. eannneiL. Graf Permit Coordinat Enclosure JLG:pm cc: Rainier National Bank 306 Main Street PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING 0 • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES September 12th, 1986 Mr. Monte Clouston 22415 Woodway Park Road Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: 12 Unit Apartment 1115 Fourth Avenue South Permit #850461 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the Building Division requires the following: PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR 1. A restrictive convenant must be recorded at Snohomish County and a copy submitted for Building Division records; 2. A two year maintenance bond for $1,500.00 must be posted prior to release of the performance bond. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator JLG:pm PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION 0 ENGINEERING 0 BOND RELEASE FORM CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISON DATE: TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-DAN SMITH {/ PLANNING DIVISION-BRUCE FINKE FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator PERMIT #: 601SPA1101 ADB # PLAT # PROJECT ADDRESS: " 7 �A& DEVELOPER ((. 0415,01Y TYPE OF BOND TO BE RELEASED / $ /4�OGID BOND DATE POSTED BOND EXPIRES Please inspect for the release of the bond. If there are outstanding requirements please advise in the space provided. 0 /s0 Z yR ,nuw- 44wo ,www BUILDING JUN 111986 BOND APPROVED FOR RELEASE,;;/7 DATED w1 // BOND NOT APPROVED SEE OUTSTANDING REQUIREMENTS DATED i • COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION DATE: Z- Zg'. y6 TO: FIRE DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION —dJW4e �b✓�e °� SUBJECT: ayiisirw PERMIT: X6?� jW z1L% 15— Please review and advise any outstanding requirements on the above permit, in order that they may be given final O Fdi�� approval and a Certificate of Occupancy issuedA� /eft' T BUILDING J UN S a Hal Reeves Building Official HR: j lg lr-j2T,sl,--.,*FFlCE CORRESPONDOCE TO_ SUB TOPS V- FORM 1232 TO SUBJECT WA rVERBIU-0RDERS DON'T.R0 j DATE LITHO IN U.S.A. /--"70 6 Or--p 14r— -j 4 a- m 5 A-, -'-r Rluloj4jr JAN 8 . 1986 'fops FORM 1232 (VERBAL ORDERS nOaN'T GO LITHO IN U.S.A. F 0 0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION DATE: 2- 2s - 86 TO: FIRE DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION `D4'1JM1H PLANNING DIVISION SUBJECT: (10US} W /I U,vir I'T PERMIT: 6"-'Co- w/ Please review and advise any outstanding requirements on the above permit, in order that they may be given final approval and a Certificate of Occupancy issued. /O �lvirv9 0� �ii��✓y GG� Hal Reeves Building Official HR: j lag Tor �v4 S , 1% WHITELEY JACOBSEN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING 2118 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98121 (206) 623-0331 4 February 1986 Mr. Hal Reeves Edmonds Building Department Edmonds Civic Center 250 Fifth North Edmonds, WA 98020 Reference: Edmonds Plan Check Carport Structure Engineer: Keyvan Pirbazari Dear Mr. Reeves: MEN" FEB 5 -1986 We have reviewed the referenced project structural requirements and have the following comments: 1. Plan view of drawings indicates a 6" x 6" post and the calculations on Page 4 indicates an 8" x 8" post. Which is correct? 2. Plan view of drawing indicates a 6" x 14" beam at the front of the carport and a 6" x 10" beam to the rear. Section B-B, which is through the rear wall, indicates a 6" x 14" beam. Coordinate plan with section. 3. Reinforcing for 24" x 24" post footings needs to be called out. 4. Section B-B: Show and call out all required reinforcing bars, 6" x 6" post or 8" x 8" post?, specify post anchor, 6" x 14" or 6" x 10" beam?, detail post to beam connection, specify truss anchorage to beam. 5. Section A -A: Show and call out all required reinforcing bars, specify truss anchorage to top of concrete wall, indicate concrete wall thickness and bar cut off lengths. 6. Front Elevation: Are braces shown required? If so, call out sizes and indicate connection details. If not required, remove them from the drawing. 7. Add the following to drawing: Title block, Engineer's stamp and signature, set of notes calling out all material strengths and design loads. Mr. Hal Reeves 4 February 1986 Page Two 8. Calculations, Page 3: Do not understand this sheet of computations, what does it show? What portion of structure has 40 psf live load? 9. Calculations, Page 4: Do not fully understand this sheet of calculations. Provide a more complete lateral analysis of structure. This should include the following: a. Clearly show lateral force resisting system. b. Show diaphragms, braces and rigid frames as required. c. Show all nailing, bolting, connections, etc., to tie the structure together and transfer all the required forces to the foundation. 10. Calculations, Page 5: Indicate where detail occurs in the structure and show on drawings if this detail is to be used by contractor. 11. Engineer shall be responsible for all member and connection design, not the contractor. Please call if you have any questions concerning these comments. Very truly yours, WJA, P.S. Architects, Engine rs Jack H. Whiteley, P.E. President Nit WHITELEY JACOBSEN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING PLANNING 2118 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98121 (206) 623-0331 10 February 1986 Mr. Hal Reeves Edmonds Building Department Edmonds Civic Center 250 Fifth Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Reference: Edmonds Plan Check Carport Structure Engineer: Keyvan Pirbazari Dear Mr. Reeves; BUILDING FEB 11 1gg6 We have reviewed the resubmitted calculations and drawings in response to our review letter of 4 February 1986 and have the following comments: 1. Add structural notes to the drawing stating material strengths, i.e., allowable soil pressure, concrete, reinforcing and timber. 2. The footing in Section A -A on the large sheet appears to be shown backwards. Turn 180 degrees to conform with calculations. 3• The footing in Section B-B should be checked for resistance to lateral force acting in both directions. 4. The calculations are based on a column fixed at the base. The connection of the 6 x 6 post in Section B-B is a pinned connection. Provide a fixed moment connection. 5. The calculations on Sheet 4 shows the front (entrance side) column fixed at the foundation. The 24" x 24" footing cannot resist any moment. Lateral resistance (100%) must be supplied from the rear column. 6. The plywood roof deck must be connected directly to the beam or blocking at the rear wall in order to transfer the diaphram shear. A detail should be shown on the drawings. If the foundations are verified by the engineer as adequate we would take no exception to a foundation permit. Mr. Hal Reeves 10 February 1986 Page Two Please resubmit lateral analysis and details for items 4, 5, and 6 above. Very truly yours, WJA, P.S. Architects, Engineers, Planners Jack H. Whiteley, P.E. President U : Er DFFICE CORRESPOWD" ';JCE TC ��l�ntiK� ATE df 11ti� LG�G /oac� z7J-7 �v -VERBAL VERBAL ORDERS DON'T GO � - - LI DATE : --'Z 5:: MEMO TO: Building Division Planning Department FRO14: Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: �.j Z1771 After review of the subject Building Permit application, we have the following comments: 1. Connection to City water system required. Z. Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. 3. Right-of-way permit required for any work on City property. 4. Driveway slope not to exceed 14% 5. Backwater valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manho e. 6. Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. I nn F/A9 International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 12505 BELLEVUE-REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 208 • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 • (206) 451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT DAVID A. BASSETT, P.E. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR MEDFORD,OREGON SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT MARK R. RODMAN DIRECTOR, BUILDING SERVICES SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT JACK S. ATKINS, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL/ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA CHARLESCLAWSON DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON, TEXAS PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY RENO, NEVADA SOL J. JACOBS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA DONALD T. MacRAE, P.E. STATE BUILDING COMMISSIONER STATE OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA MICHAEL J. NOLTE CODE CONSULTANT EUGENE,OREGON WILL AM E. SCREECHY BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON HILLSBORO, OREGON JAMES R. SINGLETON BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON, ARIZONA RONALD R. TEMBLAY CHIEF BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTOR SALINA, KANSAS CHARLES W. VOLZ, A.I.A. CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DIVISION OF CODE ADMINISTRATION ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO STANLEY WHEELER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR/ FIRE MARSHAL LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA EUGENE J. ZELLER, P.E. SUPERINTENDENT, BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JAMES A. BIHR, P.E. BUILDING AUG 2 s 1985 August 22, 1985 Harold Reeves Building Official 250 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Plan Check 1703 Project: Taylor Apartment House Dear Mr. Reeves: OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA, P.E. REGIONAL MANAGER FRANK S. NATSUHARA, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER GLENN C. FRANK, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER I have reviewed the revised plans and reply by the architect and engineer to my comment in my letter to you dated July 19, 1985 and have the following response in the same order. GENERAL COMMENTS 1,2. For your information. 3. Okay. 4. For your information. 5. For your determination. HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS 1-7. Okay. 8. Additional comment: The bathtub located in the accessible dwelling unit should be accessible. Section 511(f) OCCUPANCY AND CONSTRUCTION COMMENTS 1. a. Okay. b. For your information. Main Office: 5360 South Workman Mill Road 0 Whittier, California 90601 0 (213) 699-0541 Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves August 22, 1985 Page Two c. Not satisfied. d. Okay. 2. Separate 1 hour enclosures should be provided for each chimney. 3-7. Okay. 8. Any lateral run of the duct within joist spaces should be provided with equivalent 1 hour protection. 9. The end units do not have cross ventilation. Some vents appear advisable on the front side of the end units. 10. Okay. 11. The fireplace and chimney should be of listed factory -built components. 12,13. Okay. /-V 14. The details should be provided. 15. The guard rail height should be 42". 16. Okay. 17. The glazing should be labeled. EXIT COMMENTS 1. Okay. After accessory areas are deducted, the floor area per stairway is sufficiently close to 2000 sf. 2. Wall penetrations of the shaft enclosure walls should be limited to copper or ferrous pipes; no plastics, note that the hallway is now a part of the shaft and the water closet backs up into the shaft wall. Also, the fire extinguisher cabinet should be backed with equivalent fire protection to main- tain the 1 hour fire resistive construction. The barrier gate should be pro- vided with a landing on both sides of the gate and should not reduce the width of the corridor to less than 37". 3. Okay. 4. The handrail extension should be detailed. 5. Okay. Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves August 22, 1985 Page Three WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY COMMENTS 1. Okay. 2. I will review the calculations when they are submitted to you. 3,4. Okay. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. I will gladly review the calculations and details when they are submitted to you. 2. Should be provided. 3. For your information. 4. If exposure C is appropriate, the structural elements in which the design is governed by wind should be investigated for the added loads. 5. For your information. 6. Okay. 7. The details should be marked on the foundation plan. 8. Okay. -"�' 9. a. Okay if all walls over 5, long are shear walls in accordance with the note on the plans. v.7 b. Should be provided. c. With the numerous interior shear walls, this appears okay, however, you may wish to require the architect or engineer to sign the plans. 10, 11. Okay. I am returning all the plans to you. Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. Yours very truly, Frank S. Natsuhara, P.E. ljh Regional Engineer c/Robert Young International Conference of Building Officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 12505 BELLEVUE-REDMOND ROAD, SUITE 208 . BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 . (206) 451-9541 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER. CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT DAVID A. BASSETT, P.E. BUILDING SAFETY DIRECTOR MEDFORD,OREGON SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT MARK R. RODMAN DIRECTOR, BUILDING SERVICES SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT JACK S. ATKINS, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL/ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA CHARLES CLAWSON DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON, TEXAS PHILLIP M. HERRINGTON DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY RENO, NEVADA SOL J. JACOBS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF INSPECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA DONALD T. MacRAE, P.E. STATE BUILDING COMMISSIONER STATE OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA MICHAEL J. NOLTE CODE CONSULTANT EUGENE,OREGON WILL AM E. SCHLECHT BUILDING OFFICIAL COUNTY OF WASHINGTON HILLSBORO, OREGON JAMES R. SINGLETON BUILDING SAFETY ADMINISTRATOR TUCSON, ARIZONA RONALD R. TEMBLAY CHIEF BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTOR SALINA, KANSAS CHARLES W. VOLZ, A.I.A. CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DIVISION OF CODE ADMINISTRATION ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO STANLEY WHEELER CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR/ FIRE MARSHAL LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA EUGENE J. ZELLER, P.E. SUPERINTENDENT, BUILDING AND SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JAMES A. BIHR, P.E. July 19, 1985 Plan Check 1703 Project: Taylor Apartment House Address: 4th Avenue S Edmonds, WA OFFICES OF JERRY J. BARBERA, P.E. REGIONAL MANAGER FRANK S. NATSUHARA, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER GLENN C. FRANK, P.E. REGIONAL ENGINEER Code Information: R-1 & M-1 occupancies Type V-1 hour construction Stories: 2 + basement Floor Area: Apts 13,401; deck 1047; carports 2(1026)=5052 Occupant Load: 67 Valuation: Our Estimate--$484,000 (includes carports) 1982 Uniform Building Code Seismic Zone:' 3 Basic Wind Speed: 80 mph Exposure: B assumed Harold Reeves Building Official 250 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Reeves: Data and plans for the above project have been reviewed for conformance with the Uniform Building Code and some parts of the Mechanical Code as well as Washington State Regulations for Energy and Barrier Free Design. They have not been reviewed for compli- ance with requirements of federal, or other state and local regu- latory agencies. Most of the following comments should be reflected as changes and notes on the plans and in the specifications. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The availability of the sewer connection should be verified. 2. The site drainage plan should be submitted to your Public Works Department for review and approval. 3. Cut slopes should not be steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Section 2903(a). The tops of cuts should be set back from the south property line in accordance with Table 70-C. The faces of the cut Main Office: 5360 South Workman Mill Road • Whittier, California 90601 0 (213) 699-0541 Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Two slopes should be prepared and maintained to control against erosion. This control may consist of effective planting. Section 7013(a). The roof drainage should be conducted to the street gutter or storm drain in a suitable conduit under the sidewalk; not over the public property. Section 3207(e) 4. Portable fire extinguishers should be installed in accordance with your Fire Department. Section 10.301 UFC and UFC Standard 10-1 5. An approved address should be provided in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street. Section 513 HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS 1. The details of the ramp from the Handicap parking space to the entrance of the building should be provided. The ramp should not exceed a slope in excess of 1:12 and should lead up to a -5' landing. Doors in any position should not reduce the minimum dimension of the landing to less than 42". Section 3307(d) 2. The floor or landing should be not more than 1/2" lower than the threshold of the doorway at the public exit doors and at the entry to the Handicap units. Details of the threshold should be provided. Section 3304(h) 3. The lateral distance from the center line of the water closet to the near- est obstruction including grab bars should be 15" on one side and 36" on the other side. These dimensions should be shown on the plans. Section 511(a)A 3 4. The lavatory appears to encroach into the required 60" space. See Sheet A-3 of plans. Section 511(a)2 5. The accessible 36" x 36" shower should have a seat mounted 16" to 18" above the floor. A grab bar should be provided centered behind and beneath the shower head. Also a grab bar should be similarly mounted at one end and at right angles to the above grab bar. Provisions for the attachment of a hand held shower spray on 60" long flexible hose should be provided. A recessed soap tray should be placed at a height of 40" above the finish floor. Section 511(e) 6. The space under the kitchen counter should be at least 29" high and 24" deep. See 3/A-6. Section 1213, 4th paragraph 7. The hardware for the accessible dwelling unit should comply with the provisions of Section 5501. Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Three OCCUPANCY AND CONSTRUCTION COMMENTS 1. This building should be 1 hour fire resistive construction throughout Section 1202(b) a. Two layers of Type X gypsum wallboard should be provided for the ceiling of the top units. See Evaluation Report 1874 for an example of a proprietary system. b. The lightweight concrete should be of a type approved for use in a double floor assembly. You may wish to refer to Evaluation Reports 3433, 3404 or 1381 as a guide. c. The access door to the roof/ceiling envelope should be a listed fire protection assembly. Section 4305 d. The 1 hour fire resistive construction should be provided behind the bathtub and shower enclosures. 2. The chimney should be enclosed in individual 1 hour shaft enclosures. Details of the enclosures should be provided. See Detail AA/A5. Section 1706(a). I have enclosed a copy of Figure 14 from Installation and Operation of Solid Fuel Burning Appliances for your information. 3. Nonabsorbent wall finish should be provided for a height of 70" above ' the drain inlet at shower and tub enclosures. The backing behind the simulated marbel finish should be of an approved material. You may wish to refer to Evaluation Reports 1820, 1874, 2547 and 3366 as a guide. 4. The premanufactured skylight should be of an approved type. The ICBO Evaluation Report number should be specified or data and details should be submitted that show compliance with the provisions of Section 3401. 5. Draft stops should be installed in attics above and in line with the walls separating tenant spaces from each other and from other uses. This should be shown on the roof plan. See Sheet A-1 of plans. Section 2516(f)4 B ii 6. The minimum ceiling height in the bathroom should be not less than 7'. See AA/A-5. Section 1207(a) 7. Fire stops: a. A fire stop should be shown at the roof ceiling line at the utility room. See AA/A-5. Section 2516(f)2 A 0 • Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Four b. Firestops should be indicated at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10' intervals along the length of the wall for Detail 1/A-5. Section 2516(f)2 A. 8. The details of any exhaust vent penetrations of the rated floor/ceiling system should be shown. Equivalent protection should be provided to maintain the 1 hour rating. 9. The details of the net ventilating area of the attic vents should be provided. The distribution should be such as to satisfy each draft stop attic area. Section 3205(c) 10. The flame spread and smoke density of the insulation should be specified. All insulation materials including facings such as vapor barrier or breather papers installed within roof/ceiling assemblies and walls should have a flame spread rating not to exceed 25 or a smoke density not to exceed 450. Section 1713(c). The foam plastic insulation should have a flame spread rating of not more than 75 and a smoke develop rating of not more than 450. All packages and containers of foam plastics should bear the label of an approved agency showing the flame spread rating and a smoke develop rating or the use for which the product is listed. Section 1712(a) 11. The manufactured fireplace units should be listed and installed in accor- dance with this listing. Section 3702 12. The heating system should be capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70OF at a point 3' above the floor in all habitable rooms. General note 4 on Sheet A-1 should be clarified to show conformity to Section 1211. 13. If water heaters have nonrigid water connections, and are over 4' in height from the base to the top of the tank case, it should be anchored or strapped to resist horizontal displacement due to earthquake motion. Section 504 UMC 14. The details of the awning should be provided and should show conformity to the provisions of Section 4506. 15. Guard rails should be provided at the glazed opening located at the stairway landing. See 5/A-5. Section 1711 16. Stairway shaft walls should be provided with full 1 hour walls; that is, 5/8" Type X gypsum wallboard on both sides. Detail 5, 6/A-5 should be corrected to comply. 17. Safety glazing should be provided for the glazing in doors. The tempered glass should be identified by a label stating that safety glazing material has been utilized in the installation. Section 5406(b) Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Five EXIT COMMENTS 1. Access to not less than 2 exits should be provided from the second and third levels. Section 3303(a). 2. The stairs serve 3 levels and should be enclosed in an 1 hour stair shaft enclosure with interior door openings of self -closing 1 hour fire protection assemblies. A barrier should be provided at the discharge level of the stair- ways. Section 3309(a-d) 3. All public exit doorways should be openable from the inside without use of key, special knowledge or effort. Section 3304(c) 4. At least one handrail should extend not less than 12" beyond the top nor less than 22" beyond the bottom riser. Also, the run should be dimensioned not less than 10". Section 3306(c,j) 5. Handrails should be provided for the exterior stairway on grade with 3 risers shown on Sheet A-3 of plans. Section 3306(j) WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY COMMENTS 1. All glazing should be double glazed with 1/4" air space. Table 6-2 2. The heating design load should be calculated in accordance with accepted engineering practice using the design parameters in Chapter 3. The heating unit should be sized no greater than 125% of the design load. Section 602(a)4 3. A vapor barrier should be installed on the warm side of the exterior stud walls. Vapor barriers should be continuous over the entire heated building envelope. Section 601(f) 4. Fireplaces should be provided with a tightly fitting flue damper with a readily accessible manual control and with an outside source of combustion air. The duct should be at least 6 sq in in area and should be provided with a readily operable damper. Section 602(a)3 STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. Complete design and details by a Washington State registered engineer should be provided for the prefabricated roof trusses. The fabricator plans should show written acknowledgement that the project architect or engineer has reviewed and approved the plans. Section 302(b) 2. Complete design and details of the garage structure should be provided. Plan Check 1703 Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Six 3. Fabricators appoved and registered by you should construct the prefabri- cated roof trusses and the glu-lam beams. Section 306(f) 4. Wind exposure B was assumed in this review. This should be verified with site conditions. If exposure C is appropriate, a recheck of the lateral load resisting.system would be necessary. Section 2311(c) 5. The assumed design soil bearing is 2000 psf. This should be verified with site conditions and correlated with Table 29-B. 6. The guard rail anchorage details should be provided and justified. See Detail 1/A-6. Table 29-B, item 9 7. Detail 5/S-2 should be marked on the foundation plan at the areas of application. Note that the basement walls shown on the architectural sections are not satisfactory; a cantilevered retaining wall such as that detailed in 5/S-2 should be required. 8. If parabolts are used for uplift anchorage, special inspection may be necessary. See Evaluation Report 2350 9. A complete lateral load analysis should be provided. a. Walls that are assumed to be part of the lateral load resisting system should be designated on the plans. b. The connection details between the roof and floor sheathing to the designated lateral load resisting walls should be provided. c. The west wall of this building contains numerous openings and appear weak against lateral loads. Justification of the adequacy of the walls as.well as the necessary special details on nailing and uplift anchorage should be provided. 10. The roof trusses should be anchored against net wind uplift loads. Special consideration should be raid. to local areas and discontinuities as shown in Table 23-H. An analysis should be provided and necessary anchorage should be shown. 11. The framing at the stairwell should be clarified and the high studs at the stairwell should be justified against wind perpendicular to the wall. An invoice for this plan checking service based on the proper valuation will be forwarded to you under separate cover when you have determined the correct value. • Plan Check Harold Reeves July 19, 1985 Page Seven I am retaining all data and plans in anticipation of telephone calls from the architect and also that I will be doing the recheck. Please instruct the architect to indicate on a separate sheet on which sheet or detail the correc- tions may be found. I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this list directly to the architect in order to facilitate the construction process. Please feel free to contact me if there are any questions. Very truly yours, Frank S. Natsuhara, P.E. Regional Engineer ljh Enclosure c/Robert Young FIGURE NO.14 28 International Conference of Building Officials TECHNICAL REPORT Report No. 1874 April, 1984 1111114 a.arcyury: "ALL %,VVtMI U GYPSUM BOARD SPECIAL APPLICATIONS GYPSUM ASSOCIATION 1800 NORTH HIGHLAND HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90028 Subject: Gypsum Board Special Applications. 11. Description: 1. Application of Water-resistant Gypsum Backing Board in Shower and Bath Areas: Full-size sheets of water-resistant gyp- sum backing board having a minimum thickness of '/2 inch'are applied horizontally to supports and attached with nails or screws spaced not more than 8 inches on center, except that when ceramic tile is more than 3/s inch thick, the nails or screws shall be spaced a maximum of 4 inches on center. Where fire -resistive construction is required, Type X water-resistant gyp- sum backing board shall be used with the thickness and method of attach- ment as prescribed by the code or by technical report for Type X wallboard. All multiple layers of gypsum board shall be water-resistant gypsum board installed without adhesive. For fire- or sound -rated construction, the base ply gypsum board should extend full height, floor to ceiling. The gypsum board used as a base for tile or wall panels in tub and shower enclosures shall not be foil backed. A vapor retarder must not be installed behind water- resistant gypsum backing board on exterior walls. Building paper as required in Uniform Building Code Section 2516 (k) may be omitted; when used, it shall be of a type that is not a vapor retarder. When framing is spaced more than 16 inches o.c., suitable blocking or backing shall be located approximately 1 inch above the top of the tub or receptor and at the gypsum board horizontal joints in the area to receive tile. When the surface finish is ceramic tile, the spacing of studs 2%2 inches deep or less should not exceed 16 inches o.c. Studs 3%2 inches or more in depth may be spaced 24 inches o.c., provided blocking described above is utilized. Appropriate blocking, headers or supports shall be provided to support tub, other plumbing fixtures and to receive soap dishes, grab bars, towel racks and similar items. Interior angles shall be reinforced with supports to provide rigid corners. For shower and tub enclosures, the tub or shower receptor or pan is positioned with respect to the studs so that projecting lips of the units are flush with the outsidp face of the water-resistant gypsum backing board or as shown by illustrations on page 2. Shower pans, receptor or tubs shall be installed prior to the erection of the gypsum board. A minimum '/4-inch clearance between the paperbound edge of the water-resistant gypsum backing board and the tub, receptor or pan must be maintained. See illustrations in this report. Joints between adjoining pieces of gypsum board, including those at all angle intersections under areas to receive tile or wall panels applied over water-resistant gypsum board, may be taped (no finish coats) with joint compound and tape. All cut edges and openings around pipe and fixtures shall be caulked flush with waterproof, flexible compound. The bedding adhesive for ceramic tile shall conform to ANSI Standard No. A 136.1 for Organic Adhesives for Installation of Ceramic Tile, Type I, or latex portland cement mortar conforming to ANSI Standard No. A 118.4. Note: Water-resistant gypsum backing board as defined by U.B.C. Standard No. 47=14 is not for ceiling application. 2. Application on Exterior Surfaces: Gypsum wallboard or exterior soffit board may be used as a ceiling finish on exterior locations such as carports, open porches, walkways, etc., soffits that are tiorizontal,or inclined downward away from the building; and'on other applications may be on surfaces n6t exposed to the weather'as defined by Section 424 of the code. Spacing of framing members shall not exceed 16 inches on center when % -inch board is applied, or 24 inches on center when S/s-inch board is applied. It shall be applied perpendicular to framing members with nails or screws in accordance with Table No. 47-G of the Uniform Building Code. In large ceiling expanses, or long runs, expansion joints shall b ed t L to exceed 30 feet. The fascias ll provide a minimum of a '/.-inch drip below the ceiling board or %4 inch below fascia -ceiling board moldings, whichever is lower. A space of not less than '/4 inch shall be provided between the edge of exterior ceiling board and adjacent walls, fascia, beams or columns. Soffits shall be ventilated in accordance with Section 3205 (c) of the Uniform Building Code or as shown by illustrations below. Wallboard and exterior soffit board joints and fastener heads shall be finished as prescribed by the Uniform Building Code for interior applica- tion. Alternate joint treatment may be by application of batten strips. The surface of the wallboard shall be painted by one of the following methods: 1. Two coats of a spirit thinned oil or alkyd vace exterior paint. 2. One coat of a "one coat" type exterior oil or alkyd base paint. 3. One coat of any latex exterior paint applied over an oil base primer. Fire -rated Construction: Where a fire -resistive floor -ceiling or roof - ceiling construction is required, the gypsum board of specified thickness and type as permitted by the code or by technical reports must be used. 3. Gypsum Board Substrate for Roof Assemblies: The shearvalues in Table No. 25-K are also applicable when %2-inch Gypsum Board Substrate for Roof Assemblies is used as a substrate provided the application of the plywood is in accordance with Section 2514 (c) of the Uniform Building Code except that the nail sizes in Table No. 25-K are to be increased one size. 4. Water-repellent Gypsum Sheathing: Where water-repellent gypsum sheathing is used, a weather -resistive barrier of building paper or rag felt as required by Section 1707 (a) of the Uniform Building Code is not required where approved weatherboardipgjs applied over the water-repellent gyp- sum sheathing. Whereportland cement stucco is used as the exterior covering, the weather -resistant barrier can be omitted, provided the water- repellent gypsum sheathing is installed vertically without horizontal joints and all vertical joints occur on framing members. When installed horizon- tally, portland cement stucco and metal lath may be applied directly over the sheathing, provided one of the following is done: (a) V-edge water-repellent gypsum sheathing is used and installed so that the horizontal joint will shed water running down the face of the board. (b) Where square edge board is used, the joint is covered with a water- proof tape or is caulked with an approved caulking compound. (c) Where paperbacked lath installed in accordance with Chapter 47 is used. Where portland cement stucco is applied, weep screeds shall be required per Chapter 47 of the code. 5. Application on Ceilings for a Horizontal Diaphragm: Allowable shear values in Table No. I may be used for gypsum board applied to ceiling framing in resisting wind or earthquake forces, provided the ceiling does not laterally support masonry or concrete walls. The values shall not be used cumulatively with other horizontal diaphragms. Perimeter nailing shall be to 2-inch by 6-inch or 2-inch by 8-inch blockings installed flat over the top plate to provide a 2-inch nailing surface for the gypsum board. Nails shall be 7 inches on center and a minimum of 3/8 inch from ends and edges of the gypsum board. Diaphragm proportions shall be limited to a maximum ratio of 2:1 spanning between shear -resisting elements. Rotation or cantilevered conditions are not permitted. No continuous. end joints are permitted paral- lel to framing members. TABLE NO. I —ALLOWABLE SHEAR IN POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT FOR GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO CEILING FRAMING BOARD THICKNESS NAILS FRAMING SPACING W, O.C. 2411 o.c. % inch 5d cooler 90 70 lCBO technical reports are issued solely to provide information to Glass A members of the organization utilizing the code upon which'the report is based. Technical reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed nor as an endorsement or recommendation for use of the subject report. This report is based upon independent tests or other technical data submitted by the applicant. The lCBO technical staff has reviewed the test results and/or other data, but does not possess test facilities to make an independent verification. There is no warranty by /CBO, expressed or implied, as to any "Finding" or other matter in the report or as to any product covered by the report. This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 0 Report No.1874 6. Application on Walls for Vertical Diaphragms: The maximum allowable shear for wind or seismic forces for vertical diaphragms with 4- foot by 8-foot gypsum wallboard applied horizontally or vertically on 2 by 4 wood studs spaced at 24 inches on center shall be as set forth in Table No. 11. TABLE NO. Il—ALLOWABLE SHEAR FOR WIND OR SEISMIC FORCES IN POUNDS PER FOOT FOR VERTICAL DIAPHRAGMS OF GYPSUM BOARD WOOD FRAMED WALL ASSEMBLIES WITH 2 BY 4 STUDS 24 INCHES IN CENTERI 4 NAIL= THICKNESS OF WALL SPACING SHEARS MINIMUM MATERIAL CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM VALUE NAIL S12E % " Unblocked 5d Common 4" 175 5s" Unblocked 4" 145 6d Common .'These vertical diaphragms shall not be used to resist loads imposed by masonry -or concrete walls. Values are for short -time loading due to wind or earthquake and must be reduced 25 percent for normal loading. 2Applies to nailing at all studs, top and bottom plates. The minimum edge distance shall be 3A inch. 3See Section 4713 (a) when gypsum board is applied to both sides of the wall. 4See Table No. 47-1 of the code when framing is spaced 16 inches o6center. wood Wood Gydsun or Sof Vtnf r warorresistart Gypsum Backing Board Adhesi a Tile Paper Edge FICK610 sealant .1 1 14- Tub Support 1 Tub Floor Line v4477< - FRAME WALL Water-resistant Gypsum Backing Board Tile Paper Edge — Florible sealant Tub Hanger Tub Floor Line Identification: Each product described in Items I through 4 of Part II shall have the ASTM Specification number of product shown on each bundle or panel as follows: Item No. I ASTM C 630 Item No. 2 ASTM C 36 or C 931 Item No. 3 ASTM C 36 Item No. 4 ASTM C 79 Ill. Evidence Submitted: A report is submitted by the Armour Research Foundation of the Illinois Institute of Technology reflecting the investigation of performance of backing materials for ceramic tile. Findings IV. Findings: 1. That the application of water-resistant gypsum backing board in shower and bath areas as a backing material for approved nonabsorbent finishes is an alternate method of construction to that specified in the 1982 Uniform Building Code, provided installa- tion complies with this report. 2. The application of gypsum wallboard on exterior surfaces is an alternate method of construction, provided installation complies with this report. 3. The use of gypsum wallboard as horizontal or vertical diaphragms be permitted as specified in this report and provided calculations and details are submitted for approval by the building official. This report is subject to re-examination in one year. I q. I � Gypsum W011boord or 5011.1 Board im '4* Minimum $pact ' Wood Trim— MASONRY WALL Wmtmresistam Gypsum Backing Board V4' Adhesite rde Paper Edge Flexible SF 1 $honer aecT V4' Floor La,e N Insect Screen Wood Focro GYDeum Wollboord or Solt, t Board GalvOnlled Mftol Trim Gypsum Wallboard Wood Fd[td or Soffil Board or wall Gotronutd kittol Tn ALTERNATE FACIA DETAILS MEMO TO: Devon Drake VIA: Mary Lou B10 ckL" N- FROM: Jeannine L. Graf DATE: November 26, 1986 RE: Monte Clouston 1140 5th Ave South Account #7593-405-9 Please release $1,300.00 for the grading work at 1140 5th Ave South. All interested City departments have inspected the site and approved release of the funds. 0 0 CONTRACTOR'S BOND BANK ACCOUNT WITHDRAWAL AUTHORIZATION We, Mary Lou Block, City of Edmonds Planning Manager, and Elaine Dimon, City of Edmonds Accounting Supervisor, hereby authorize partial final withdrawal in the amount of $ /S .00 (circle one from Account on this date Please prepare a cashier's check in such amount and send it to: Mary Lou Block Planning Manager /llolyl- "(51-P.Y Sy(0-6391 e—D mern Accounting Supervisor { `~ BOND RELEASE FORM CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION DATE: TO: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT-DAN SMITH PLANNING DIVISION-BRUCE FINKE FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator PERMIT #: ADB # PLAT # PROJECT ADDRESS: 11 DEVELOPER /r/. TYPE OF BOND TO BE RELEASED �/c /¢,O/✓i� $ r BOND DATE POSTED lf'-12� BOND EXPIRES Please inspect for the release of the bond. If there are outstanding requirements please advise in the space provided. BOND APPROVED FOR RELEASE DATED BOND NOT APPROVED SEE OUTSTANDING REQUIREMENTS DATED -1122 PO W2 ��/ /vPi l 22Z -,I��2�NOlil>.X �7JS "/IIZt� /vb `_i171I eZOW I • 5' M ,� � r � t�� ,�%71 � rt�t4% ! ♦kI PIT. 1°i .r Y x •mod ��*+x . ° �. rl� 1 it '"Y j" r NI MIi � Fes• . • • •• •\ � �, �'� ,+f '' r' {� -� A�'��" ,+. •t'':Q. '•i .t't v. Fa�"5 "'x r�'� r a..Yj� .� I j ;', Ste+ .r 'r•. .;•• •'• # �+,,'� , �°i�. � f,.l� _ , � p_ •ram ••F�' , r�•• • � i'�• �y�'•i � rsi°. .�h S� (J �.�' � � �pp�"� i�• • tirt�. _c.'+ fir'-i '�� ! y'��••Yt ' 14 1*ttrj�. r s JOIN ALTERNATE +� ..lp Y S-2®a I 4 rO� ° A.P.W.A. STAND. 2- A -I OR MATCH. • 1 d EXISTING. G. LIP FINISHED MONOLITHIC POUR '.0 TC I"RAD. `REQUIRED FOR g ' 24" NEW CURB / GU TIER , � � ., g� IS TO Mdt SECTION. -. a Y`Y ..6�. � e � •,`r�,-,�q '. r ♦ .•,SS.. .; •t'.t• V 'h.. ss {; �.a .Y i •; t�,: 1 1�y�C ,'mow.•, • •,y�•• 4 ', �'ir.. ,r i1' 4 f -.S .. • i�j^�i • -. it �Y�. H. i 4�jS 5 a '�r �" . i .• �� i yi � �, �' / � � .. •f 1� � �" 1 yyY. k� 4". #k,, " WENER�►� " arVEs 3 k� ;JOINTS `II `" .WHERE ORIVE : EXtZEQS 16"WDTH At tkJl4ll++lY .i4 T , ` � v ,x .., 6HAi.L 8E +CED n 'ONGITU(� NALLY AL6NG . CLEAN A �, �« �� . IT r` ' •. �DG E ALL TS T.,AA1lEASE ORIVEW4f, JOLTS AS SNd `< lAR .0Ii6JC7ED. MIIE.EA., ,. , r � " `' MATERIAL. N MEET; SPECIFICATIONS. C�,�MC�ETENAI.L �IE�.�ClA5S:.5(3) OR•. Sti 1/2i. I• S.iM15 PLACIMG,FWASIHING &CURING,PER + �, , n+1 tC'A?10NS # I MEN CONC.DRIYEIAIAY THATA91EA PLACED " A is EI~►I N D • .STREET ' CUR&NG r H O� Md' ` �t�/,//,,yy��r��'' , a �� Il�YISION $CAI PTION Y.. -'• �.�. y....i :.fps ..- .�4..,.., M-:. LAMPHOLE C0 5931 OR EQA L MC CO. w 7 7- +1 s N 6"CITY STUB 6"CITY ; I UNDER ASPHALT `1rASPH- CONC. 2" LEVELLING COURSE ACE COURSE Clo�ioTED 801E OR PLASTIC 014WOLE PLUS-- QUIRE D . I N •� Stir • : t.; ` � i i.: � • . •ti . UNDER GROUND 6" RISER 6" WYE �� KIM (450) bR6" SDE SEWER w 6 r * TILT rRISER i" WYE E % SEND (4a •) A 6 SIDE SEWER CITY OF IEOMONO8 STANOARO PLAN NO. I SEWER CLEANOUT DETAIL ''� ! REVISION DESCRIPTION • Ll CITY OF EDMOIMOS 250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 BUILDING DIVISION DATE: TO: 11*i 1k 420USi07' 22 y/s' hlooaw� R'e,- A041 zd7 ^041ds, 4V,¢ SUBJECT: 12 11/S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR TRANSMITTING: /% D 14CO Pt � /' I, /�CfJAi�TjL;G1ir FOR YOUR APPROVAL: FOR YOUR FILE: AS YOU REQUESTED: FOR YOUR INFORMATION: COMMENT AND RETURN: REVIEW AND COMMENT: FOR CORRECTIONS AND RE -SUBMITTAL: EBD 11/83 COMMENTS: BUILDING, DIVISION June 28, 1985 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: 12 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT 1115-4TH AVENUE SOUTH After review, the fire department has the following require- ments: 1. Fire Alarm System: The alarm system shall include provisions for smoke detection and manual opera- tion in interior corridors and automatic detection in storage rooms, laundry rooms, furnace rooms and similar common areas. Adequate audible devices shall be provided to produce a minimum of 60 dba in all areas of the building. Fire alarm plans must be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 2. Unit doors entering into the corridors are required to be 20 minute rated door assemblies and shall be maintained self -closing. 3. Fire extinguishers shall be a minimum of 2,A-10,B:C, dry chemical type and shall be provided on each floor as indicated on Sheet A-3. GLM:be BUILDING JUN 2 81985 1 - L 1 1 - i A 11 l f I3 11 % d PROTECT REVIEW C HECMST PROJECT NAME: O�CSTGY/ /c y PROJECT ADDRESS: APPT.TrATT()M RFIT:TPT DATE: - Reviewed by: (initial/date) COMMENTS PLANNING WTR/SWR I STREET ENCNRNG FIRE BUILDING ////%/ // SINGLE FAMILY/MULTIPLE/COMMERCIAL - (Circle One) SETBACKS CHECKED - Planning /77777777 TIT1771 VARIANCE/SETBACK ADJ. ///////// //////// ////////// 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 2 ///// // ADB REQUIREMENTS CHECKED ////// -7 ///////// //////// ////////// 3 gI'tR ZONING REQUIREMENTS ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 4 77777777 ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ////// ///////// //////// 5 ACCESS SLOPE & VEHICLE ACCESS ///////// ///////// //////// 6 / / DRAINAGE PLAN (On Site) ////// ///////// ///////// //f///// 7 'TFIFFTTfTrFI7 STREET FILE ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 8 DESCRIPTICN VERIFICATICXd ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 9 _LEGAL 7TI11111 QUIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 10 EASEMENT - PUBLIC/PRIVATE ///////// ///////// //////// 11 / CALCULATE SEWER CONNECTION IF NO LID# ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 12 PLAT/SUBDMSICN REQUIREMENTS ////// ///////// //////// 13 RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQD ////// ///////// ///////// 14 // // BOND REQD FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 15 SOILS CONDITIONS & GROUND WATER FIELD CHBCKED ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 16 ///// // ////// /// ///// n, STREET PAVING REQUIRED ////// ///////f/ ///////// 17 /71-1-IT71-17 Tr11111111 CURB AND G fTER REQUIRED ////// ///////// ///////// ////////// 18 SIDEWALK REQUIRE7D ////// ///////// ///////// 19 777777 /////// / ///// / // TR / CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY REQD ////// ///////// ///////// / 20 117711111 7TR7T777 STREET NAME SICK REQD ///////// ///////// ////////// 21 01MM SIGNING REQQ / 22 SIM SO= AVAMMILITY ////// ///////// /n//////// ///// / 23 6�!IM MIN SIZE 171111 ////// ///////// a �t � //////// ////////// 24 !l ///// WATER METER SIZE ////// ///////// //////// 25 SERVICE LINE SIZE ////// //////// o2�t //////// / ////////// 26 pp HYDRANT REQUIRED JU N 24 1905 %//%% //////// ////////// 27 HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING EDMONDS FIRE DEPL / / ////// ///////// � / / //////// / ////////// 28 _ CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION REQD ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 29 ///////// / ////// /////// WATER METER CHARGE REQD ////// l//////// DD• //////// ////////// 30 FIRE LINE CHARGE REQ_D - SPRINKLER ///////// 31 STREET CUT ////// ///////// ////////// 32 OPEN DITCH EXISTING ////// ///////// ///////// 33 REQD ////// ///////// ///////// 34 /// / /// //////// CULVERT REQD ////// ///////// //////// 35 7"777777 SIZE ////// ///////// ///////// 36 777T77777777777 CATCH BASIN REQD ////// ///////// ///////// 37 777777:77777-7777777777777 QVI INDICATED ON SITE PLAN ////// ///////// ///////// 38 SH69ffER DRAINAGE MAINTAIN / // 7 TITIT 7 / SHALE OPEN RUNOFF ////// ///////// ///////// 39 TW1111111111111111 MISC: MQQ. 1M tQAAtD - �3P 40 REVIEWED BY: PLANNING MGR. ENGINEERING MGR. PUBLIC WORKS MGR. RECORD OF C0NTACT'S is Ll i 1 21 2 22 3 23 tfllfP ! 4 24 5 25 6 26 7 27 _ 8 28 9 29 10 30 AIK �� r�i,- %� A00 All? Id 11 31 12 32 13 33 14 34 15 35 16 36 17 37 18 38 19 39 _ - 20 40 ¢ r F^ A rrif±�i�s�E �ja1{�t;b14yR h Si'� P S�•t•jry'�t,n,t ..rIq, �j .',.. • ' t,, 'r.fyt{✓(t`t..t�,7C�f•. sh1: ) �•4f�1 p{'�F` I r `{'I+l �r?` , A '' , .�{ Tw ; , r_ n r : .. .• l jj tr , ¢ ��11 f1,11171�t; rI1 rl } , wQ•tFt ,,J1rr� )7�tr. •�t ,� i', is n:,' t,ay r,'1;1 '�7(f 1t�. , ��4Y�y � ��"ifs R� �, ,1i� 11 i� y`} rll� r1 �: •'D�)7�tf 1t' , ' t}t'1'1' , .� ., .� +,. � �t�!•I�•iY°�'s)vul'Fb11�vR��fy';! �4 �C-y {�� ` , a � . �� , t r ' I s r 1 e ' • t it' , i �:d t i' N ! � Y � �• . p 1( ,1 lyl ! I ,t 1: d y ii.'^j�Sr ✓ n,t'r,, �{ :. ` r •,'.,, 1 t r � ��Q �'Si 1 ° 4 �t fSN� tk t L 1)A r'�k '�,�.�� T• , �{. -•,..ti it � ti r -�, tr}Yi' ,`t. t .?n )•y�1 I� t r. l 1• .r7� of � ;. r-f' rKt ) )�+. °L Y►,�'` + .t 4 � + i , t i j( f i �• , , j�4 ��! }find fi �''��n�� ?t�, � Ca:l'' .!',,,.,ills)! t•tl�ir J, St �' .,`.�t y,•• 't�,s � ' r, "''/ 1)a �t t"''r9a ��`� 'r #k('" yt��i ��e�; J,SIS tl, r t i S �t'{ I-,;'��• . yP > � �' `• �' •t. ' n if t tfr �,{ Y4 �� r1 t:f r++��,��fN�� {`, �'�r� �1� •��,�j;A �r ` i- � aKj Ir v. r,; •�' `� S'v � ;1,1 t1 ��lhf. f. �,R rC'd' }�N�1 1r anti •l�F�'i�, •+Y�r�lh,�ti�ter•.. 'c=`" `4 �i• ;.«• r I '+•r�ita7F ^S, 4f � �7��,ra t�� t 'T)�� j:,ii'. ( .r ,•'?! HRitio'�I �.{�' 'y- !. ,' ..t, '1. �.` ••t'•t• '.�I r i, °A,fi '%`7 '-�,� •i[iJc �V �af}.'t1� 1 t`h :. t.. t•:°; ° t fl�t'r y,titsty 1, '3��♦�; ,i�r'' kj r,' + #,rl,f at ,� r '.i •. •'� • t , ,! a-,. o :7,�i,.V+ n . tYi�' i1� �'I�r' 2+ )�:}! 51r� S r • .i,+ r � �s.4 �. � (:s •� i, ' .•L �tr,. I ,l��•. '4 tFF� w '�'. t,� x•� t �» •�i,,�n?�h� /,i �yJ,.. �� t i a •r,',, t t 4 a .F ., :i• .. � ' I •+� N� ;�i'' �' �• r 'rt. r� t � r ��.: '� - r •: � !r � '. �� t ral t1 _ • • • , �,• . t t ` � t J r , � � S tt t,L� Si ,� j �i:, yy � r1b / _>.• �r• t �.rs v 'r':�-��^��ii�i t).j f. B j Yo 4 •• 1 �t r Ri t +� sl f71' r[M, W,V W.b � ;� t` , t .i•t' r -a �,� os 11,,E t. g'L2.i`. �I' i ��, (�� : �,.1 ,1 '`• ' rfk', r R . 'f`i •' "Vq. r , >t. Imo.• i ++ ~ ,S1)� „ , ! •� ''S1F e.E;�,{`ft�ar, r +tt� zrJl+`s '�•l��G r � •7/ t . f �,�,:'s,•� .�, r•t f,1 Al J� � � „ �-t.; ;.. ,rr r �lCj A '•+<I, .{,.. tp} C;S '� '�'��";�`�r,;iy. ��; (ty�' at ,f!•� ;x .t�„ 1 S 1 ' J. r �/'I/ e: • •� rL � tp{�r 7E`J �S fy� !t A•[�"j4 �'t�v��'�Y'.S" �R�4i{:, + �s Y, ; t � - 1f (1 0 r� ot - �- n,K • ir? , `;`j'r ,, � {; n -All 1 , ! �,, Ir;� ! }•:$� tF v iP1t ' .rpi t yfJ;, �. / .' j , y r'•� r • CS i- 7 '' itr' y,�� rJ Tt . yTi li �'tr"It �)Y t'y ,'ae';1.�^77) 'f f' 7 Vo rtlti'ltY `c. a) ), t•'�•' .`Jtil•S ! vr. iil it A'rfl t Pj s �) • Fd`a;;, . I i 1 �.n f •r ,i � n f t 1 � t { i 1 rt i f '"' iMf `� L, vrv��j�{}`�,2$j1 ` F ,�a •n 'O��r J.)'`4:ti;(s t..: r ' f j r 0 � { � A ,L, r • ` i r`i '� {, 31i { 7y,i 1'''' i � f I' ��L' a 'r ��IrrT2�! � fC • ^ �1 c)•{4. ^II,.; f; .', ?r�t1�;,j 1 a 1; 7,?I c 7i✓L �' ;'r ' 7 ,r"S i ! t / r: I. �• AJtS Y �;,' F il.rY rp .,' �' If•:. ,.. rOSi l7i n, l'//1�V V ��r,, � i; •� } .� 1 .wr7 r. S1 M j '�J[� 3 t" Wi' r i`t� r v, EXOANS�V itl�,i :,; .,;;,)', , k�,. t' .' '`a,t r; -,� M � Jti � �'t, � r.rfb ri t. 1 �, 1,��''t.. '� •� �k� F ;1�;'i i '^`d; el' , .t�s , Y.'�t4 .rf, , 4,II I• Y- 1G t9 s ;ti �?` arl .. O t •�t v.. +. t,,. ;: �� V, 'ALTERNATE' :. 'r "•�L• •••,'� yA./� •� ,li ,(•. 11 J It �!{�J�y�.q%tytU',�{7-�u•t�'Z1 H t... '!"• ••O�V 'T':'`f "Y Top O�dF rj �' -1 f�F1�4'4'a.• r,� TN, No S112% 1' o A.WiwoA STAB%- , :,•� : �.aa, l EXISTING. .iP' IN) HEC- MONOLITHIC ' POUR TO'- 111 RAD*, 'REQUIRED FOR 24° PJEIiI :.' . CURB /GUTTER 9, 16 TO MAT SECTION. ' . ,� G, ,Z (r� ,r � ,) 1,1 r 64. '.t tta t, •tl�.r� ° � •� •' /At !'y '' iirf � t s et {lit 7 � t t .ram/Q � r t�11t .• f � ` � Ivg '`�,.. �� •V' .. ,,: {. .�: .:'e. sr ,f} t I Pa»i �wr'+r`- .n• i� iIaF°� r :•jtrr i n w�: �'�rN �1k.��' � l' F y, .,s!% ?{ tT a�J� . ,t, .�/ � �r `i'w• y�, 3 � d ✓ • y... P. ` j^�� / �ytk"�f a!K"r•'�fk J�i,�rt, t,4`J.tJ�d"!r ?t 3�7 t ,,�It.yrt.L7i,s t"�,t':rlt .4 �� ;•IA�ti �_ _ ?'� y r• :��rAf y� ts,., 1�j,, .r �.�. �� .•If`•,.. a J tt_ti. i r- J}r ty,Z`.�>` t.i'r Jt':. iJ V.�• .•V ;bw'''r i',t'1 rvp•se� h-�yt�'_ Jtw�'1iM.fir �f((l'7;�(`.+� , rt .�i, r t r �`r, .` .•. �_ .. .,J+ t ,;. l � w � .�` 'E�«j. i4 i A 4 Y fyi s � t- .,• aa� 7. )?, �" r, '• 4,ie � .1, r h p ' j ,.{r,; + )¢c.� ..' •, ; t A� .rfb `,�i •Jv,' r, f t_ �' � "l.'� 4 ,Y St r i.• ' ` ' �` rh a. f t 'Y • dh r t' ..i r: r't ,` �• i} GENERA ,,1 • ' y�� t:�-•f fT71%-1 OINTS.�71 .'l r^tr t cWk RiVEEREDE.•y^Y�//'r�r �XeerY��.O�f S';, l$ NlaTH A QO UlMY JOIN SMALLtOE!PLAtEUIL;ONrATlOiiALLY ALbG�QUAN AN l�iiTSi1flEgRpVE�A'JtTSNODG E ',ALL{`w`��r� ;I�A R;;O0;RECEOr0_ ft;+,�•zs,`z � t , Pf9EET""SPECOICAT16WS: w -� , :`��° r�, i} �y � � 4 r'�. lY- r !'�,r�'Yt,'i 3 �' • � . .. � � :� '"ti�'3R.•.r '�'� ,i t.'�'' +�� ;1.�,9 var,• � ' '�,"f � r ,,' i •'t''..r k`ftSii�r ? PF��RETE"a;'.`lAl.4'E'fi.Y.:�E1;3S .SQL) ®R `�o re2D. ,4 ti ' st�?ixa: •,7 irrtQGDUFESjFR�9S'RLACrl�G F�1�SHI8VG &?'Ci�RING P 3'rf k CIFICATIONS t. �' t s ''.. �A4A EMEN Q�''.COiUC:ORIV lAY TNATA�t A PLACED EET CURBING, J tf#.flEftilND'.STR 1 �r %' uh•1 t{at r•i f ,,,�w� r ?7 14{ MENT� ? N`k RE �E Q�r., r7iw ` t ` �`'i1;4u7 +Ysa'1�1,Yr} ^it, t •'r .v I �rle•<yirr Ct .i D 1� Y'W ,r"�! � Y1S1014 i':� tw rt EBCRIPTlpa , ',, �� } , I,•< Standard Drawings % 1. Squares Spaced-'G As Indicated- Ht jD ❑ 0 ❑0❑00 ❑a❑ i1 Raise -�"Wide f Border 10 91�2' d d i 4 71 2 '% 71 15 Cast Iron Ring And Cover Pipe Material As Specified. 12" Fibre J Pac k ini �r �`— Plug To Be Sealed In Same Manner As Main Sewer Joints. DO NOT SCALE DIN. V II 1 53- t-4 I N S TA L L 'Q.B.. TYPE I BEG IN"CUR B,S AND PAVEMENT ---EXIST CURB INSTALL C.B..,-_jYPE (INSTALL 12"dONC, AN. mri I N Z) I r-YVALr% INSTALLb /—INSTALL C.B. TYPE I .,SEWE �ST. EX. 6"tt Sl IIB", SA N SEWER EXIS'T 10" STORM,/ (BY OTHERS) STORM I C; �-A V IE INSTALL C,B. NO.4 (TYP E 16) AIN INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT CO N N ECT'TO 8" Q. I WATERMAIN INSTALL C.B. NO. I INSTALL C. R; NO. 3 / - , . , - li (8" QI. WATERMAIN BYOTHERS) TYPE 16 INSTALL F H. (TYPE I'6 D W. M. M v INSTALL 8" .1 INSTALL C.B. NO. 2 M.V.O. 4 ./4 'NSTALL 12" CO'NC. S T. S,�" ST. C.B, TYPE I (TYPE 16) IN CONNECT INSTALL 8" D. I. WATERM A IN IF 8" MAIN NOT AVAILABLE TO 4" C.11. ON NO. SIDE OF PINE INSTALL 1.5"COINC.,STORM SEWER INSTALL FIRE HYDRANT CON S TR U CT S T D.'� d. 0 FOR EMERGENCY, ,it INSTALL STOR M SEWER MH-NO.I M REMOVE EXIST. C.O. AND INSTALL 15" CONC. ST. SEWE 5 . 0. EXTEND SAN. SEWER AS CONNECT EX. I ZTO NEW MH SHOWN --INSTALL CBMH 3 LLJ w z INSTALL 15" CONC-ST.SEWER 6 PROPOSED 8" WATERMAIN BY CITY OF EDMONDS 4.5� 5 14' 1,5 2.L 0 00 2 �O P R 0 PO S E D 6 D.I. WATERM,AIN' .--INSTALL CBMH 4 O'ST.EWER SS "B" 2"ASPH CONC PAVEMENT CLA 2"CRUSHED ROCK T LEGEND 4"PIT R U.N GRAVEL (AS, DESIGNATED) DAYLIGHTIN EX. ASPH. DITCH .EXIST ASPHALT 10, PROPSED 8" SAN' SEWER' NEW ASPHALT TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION (BY OTHERS) .�N.T.S. PROPOSED 8" SAN. SEWER--"/ INSTALL CBMH NO. 2 ....... .... ........... . .. .. ....... ............ ...... . .... .. .. . .. .......... . .............. . . .. . ........ . . . ........ . ....... .... . .. ..... . ........ .... ..... ...... ... ....... i.. ... . ....... ..... . ... ......... . ......... .. . .. .. ..... ... . ....... T . . . ...... ...... ... . ........ . ...... .. .. ............ . . . ........ . .. . ..... ... t ....... . .... . ... .. ..... . .. .. ..... .... . . ..... ... .......... ... .... . . . ... ....... .. .. ... .. . .. . ............ . ..... . ...... ... . I. . .. ......... ....... . ....... .... 7i7. ... .. .. .. ........... . .. .... .. . ....... .. . ... . ..... . .... . ........ . ...... .... . .. ...... . ........ . . ..... I............ ........... III.......... ............ . ......... .... . I.... . ........ . ....... . ..... ...... . -1--* to i I' ll� � 5v�. 00 ................ - l.. - - ... .. . ....... ...... . . . .... .... ...... . . ... . ..... ...... ... ......... . . ... . . ..... . ..... ........ ... .... .............. .. ........... .. .. ... ...... .. . .... ...... .... . ... . ........ . ..... .......... .. . .... ... . . ................ . ... ..... ... . . .. .... .... .. ............. .. . . .......... . ........... . .... ...... ..... 146 .......... .. .. . ................ . .... ...... . ....... .... I... ...... ...... ......... .. . ....... ..... . .... .. .. . .... ..... ....... .......... .. ... ....... .. . L ... .. ..... .. I....... . ....... ............ Im .. ... ... ..... . ..... . ...... . ............. . ....... ... .. ... .... ..... . .. .. .... 0 . ...... .... .. ..... .. .. ... ........ .... .. . .... ...... . ... ..... . ...... . ... . .... . ... t cb ... ........ .......... .... . . .. ...... . . ..... .. . . .... ... I.. .. . .. . ........ .. . .. .... .... . . ..... . ...... ..... . .. . ...... ... ....... . ..... .... ... .. .......... . . .. ..... I 3 0 0 ....... ..... . ....... ........... ...... ..... . . .... ....... . ....... .. . . ......... . .. ...... . .. ....... ... .. ...... .. ... . ........ F,INIS-HE,D GR-A E ............. .. ... ..... ... ..... . . .. .. ..... 1. E.� �O .... ........ -�Ac .. . ....... .. .. ... .. ...... .. . . . ....... . ...... . ......... .... . ........ .... ... .... . . .......... Ti . .. ... 'TdP' OFtUR+B-i . . . .. ..... ... ... . . ..... .......... ....... .... ........ .... . ............. ..... .. . .. ........... ......... . ..... . ...... .. .. ...... . ...... .. . ... . .... ... ... A ............ ...... ... ... ... .. . 4-, .,- � -4,; .......... . . . . .. ...... I.. .11 I.., - � .: - , - , ill- - I ... ...... ... ;O-4- ..... ..... . .... .. .... . ........ .. ....... 1 20 ... . . ..... .... . .... . .. . . . ....... ..... . .... ....... . ...... . 4b .... ......... .... .. .... .. .. .......... .... 77 . . .. ........ . . ......... . . . . .... . ............... .... ... ..... . . . ......... .. ........ .. ................... . 60 L 11. 4950. ........... ..... . .. ....... ... .... .... . . .... . .. .... .. ........ .......... .......... . ...... ...... . .... I..... ......... . ... . .......... ....... ........... ..... -.� . ........ .. . . ..... .. ... . ....... . .... ....... . .. ..... .. . . ......... ... .... . . ..... ..... ............. .............. .... . .... . .. . ... . ......... I.. . . .. ......... .... . .. ... . . ........ ... ........ .. 4 O., . ....... .... ............. . ..... ...... .... . ... . .. ....... ... . . ..... .............. ....... *�— . ... ...... .. ......... .. ..... . .... ..... . .... .... .......... ..... . .. . ...... ...... .... ... . . . ....... . .. .... .. ........ .1.1 . ............. .. ......... . . .... ...... . ........... .. ............ .. . . ...... .. .... ...... LE ... 1+13' 00 .... .. . ....... . . . . ...... . ...... .. ... ............... ... . . ......... ... .......... ..... ....... ; E-�M� Py� E,:,,E--X 0 -AND-, ... . ............ . ... ... ..... .... . ........... .... .... ... ..... ..... SRO., . ...... . ....... ......... .......... . .... . ..... . ............. - ---- - . . . . ........ ...... ...... . . . . . ........ ...... ........ . . . .. .... .... ........ ..... .,EXT,4,N ........... .. .... ..... ... ........ ........... . ..... ... ... .. .. .......... .. . ..... ..... . ... ........... ............ .. . ... ................ . ... .... . ... . ..... . .. ...... ... . .. . ......... .. ........ ... ......... . ... ....... .. ------ . ... .......... . ........ ............... ......... .... .. .. . . .... .......... i I—, .. - 1 . .. ... ......... ...... ..... ... . .... ............... ....... ............ ... ....... ... .......... . ................... ........... .. ... ..... . ......... ..... ....... ... ............ ................ . . . .......... ... 4 . ..... . ... ............ -EWER .... . . .... .. . ...... . ... ....... ... . . ..... AN- 5 -- ----- ... .. ... ............. .......... ......... ... . .... .... ......... ........... .... . ............. ... . .... .. � ... .. . ..... ... .... ... . ... ...... ... ........ . ..... .... . ..... . ...... ...... ...... .... ...... . .. . ............. ........ .. .. ..... ....... . . ........ .......... ... ........... ............ ...... ................... . .......... ... . ........... .... . ..... ... ........ .... . . . ........... .... . .. ........ F C UiR 8 ...... .... .... . . .. .. ........ ....... ....... . .... ... ......... ........... .......... .... ..... . ... .... ...... ....... ... ..... ...... . . ...... ... . .. . .... ........................ ...... ......... ... . ........ . . . .... .......... E -5D -OF ...... . . . . . . .... .... .... ..... .... ....... ........... .. . . . .... ........ ................. .... I ! .................. . .... ... ..... . ..... .................... ....... . . . . . ................. ......... . ............ ... ................ . . .. ... ......... ............... .. .. ......... ....... . .. . . ...... . . ......... ................... . . STRE�f-T 9 . ... .......... ......... ... ... ....... . ............... ............ . ............ . ..... ..... ... ....... ....... ... ............. ... ... .... . ...... . .... . ... ... .......... ... ... . ..... ....... . .. ... . -il- I - - -_ I ... I I I. - - - I. 1, .. ,, 1 , - , :, 4 i ............ ........... .. . . . ...... ............... ..... . . . ...... . .. .............. - - I .... .......... ..... ... ........ ... .. . .......... . ...... ...... IOx__q:_GV" S.-T - .. ...... .......... ..... .9, 0 . . .... .. .... ....... ........... ..... .......... ..... ...... I.E4,931 00'' .. .. ... ............ .... ......... . . . ........... ....... . ........... ..... q: ...... .... . ............ .. ... ....... ..... ... .... ... ....... . ..... . .... . .................. .. .............. ..... ......... . .. ....... ... .... ... .......... ... . . . ............. ....... .... ...... ..... ..... ............. . . ..... .................... .......... .. ... . ........ .... .. .... - .. . . ...... ...... .. ..... . . ... ........ . ....... .. .. ... . 0 . ... ....... . ....... . .. . . .......... -_ ........ . ... .. . ........... . ............ ...... ........... ... ......... ...... .......... ............. .......... . ..... . ...... . .... ............... . ............. . .......... . . .. .. ............... . . - - ---- . ........ .......... . ........... . .... ... ............ . .. ............ . .......... . . ... ............. . . ... ........ .... . .......... . ............... .. . . . . ........ ..... ........ ...... ..... I.......... .. ....... ... . ........... . .. ..... . .......... ..... ...... .... ... ... .. .. ...................... I - . - - .. .. . ..... I - - __ _ .. ......... .............. .. ......... . .......... . ....... ..... . . ......... . . ... ..... ..... ....... ....................... . . . . .... ........... ........... ... ... .. ........ ... . . . .... ............. ..... . .... ... ... . .... ... ........ . ..... .................... ........... .......... ...... .. .............. ..... . ............ . .. . ....... ........ . . .. . . .... ......... 's . .. . ..... . ..... .. . .014c .3, 0 -L F ..... .......... . ............... . ..... ... . . . ....... . ............ ... ...... . ... . ........ ... .......... . .. ...... .. ... . .. ......... .. . ....... ........... . . ....... ..... ...... ........ .......... ..... 1_11-1--....... . ............. . . . . ............. . ...... ... .............. ... .. ...... .... ........ .... . ...... ......... ..... ................. . 1�__l .. ......... .......... ... ...... .. .... . . ..... ................ . ....... . ..... - .... ................ .... ......... . .. . .. . . . ....... .. . .. .. .. .... .. . .... ....... ... ......... ... ............. .. ............. : ........ . . ....... ... ... . . ........ .... ..... ...... ..... . . .. .... . . ............. ...... ......... ............. ....... . ..... .... .......... ... ............. .. ........ . ..... ...... ... .... .............. ...... .. .... ..... . .. ... .... ....... ...... ....... . ... ....... .... ... . . .... ........ ....... .. . ..... - - -------- --- - ... ...... . ........... . ...... . ..... . ....... ... ....... . .. .. ....... . ............ .. . .. . .... ............ .. . .......... .. . .. ..... . .... ........... . I. ............ . ....... . ........ ..... .. ... ............. ...... .... . . . . . .......... . . ..... .. . .... ...... I . ........ . .......... .... ...... ... .. ....... ..... . .......... ................. .......... . . ... .. ................... ....... . .... . ........ . .... .. ............ ........... .. .. .. .... . .. . .... .... .. .............. ..... . ... .. . .... .... . ...... ............... ............ . . . ..... . ... . . . . ....... .... . . ..... . .. ............ .. . . ..... . ... . .... . .......... ............. .. ....... ........ .. . . . ....... ...... ......... ...... .......... .... ...... ................ ....... . . .. ..... ..... ..................... ........ ............. ... ........... . ............. .... .......... . .................. . ...................... 4, .......... L . .. .......... ............. ............ .... ........ . . ........... ... ........ ..... ........... .... ... . . . .... ...... ..... . ..... . . . ...... . ..... . ...... ....... . ...... .. ... . .. ........ . . ...... .. .. . .. .......... ------ ........ .. . .. ... . .............. . ...... .......... ..... .. . ..... .. .. ..... ...... .. . .. ..... ... . .. .... ... ....... . ........ . . . . ... . .. ... ........... .. ... ........ .... . . . .. ......... . ... .......... . ........... ..... ..... . I ........ ..... . ....... .. . ...... .. ........ .. . . . . . ...... ... ..... .... . ........ .... ........... . ...... . ............. .......... .......... ...... ........ ............ ....... . .. ............ . ..... . . .... .. .......... .... . . . .. ...... . . .......... ........ ..... ... ... ..... . ....... .. .... ....... .. ........ ................... ... . ..... .... ........ ..... ... ..... ..... 4 . . ...... . ..... ........... ............ ....... . . ..... ... ......... ........... .. ...... ...... . ..... .......... ........... ..... ........ ....... . .. .. .................. . . . .. ...... . ... ......... .. ....... .... ..... +1 i .� I . I .. ..... .... .. . ...... ... ........ ..... .. - 1 4- -, -:- I I I I I., - +4.1 .. r . .. � 11. I .: . . . .. .. . ...... ......... . . ... ....... .. .. ... .. .... .. ... . ..... . .... .. ...... . ... ... . . .... . .... . . . .... ..... . .......... . .......... . . . I. . . ........ m' R PtE, ET ............. ... ..... ...... . ... . .... . ......... .. .. ... ... .. ... ........... ...... . ....... . .. .... ... . .... II.. .. ..... ...... . ..... ... ...... .. .. ........... ...... 0 3 4, 5 6 8 9 REVISIONS D A BY' 324 MAIN TREET DESIGN DRAWN CHECKED DArr H.SCALS I"-- 50' FILE NO., 1. 956A NO. Rea, w&06ffe&* .4"waar", Iwo EDMONDS, WASH. V. SCALE I 0 CWJ KC T, RJ 4/17/7 SHEST I or I NGINEERS 9.8020. FOURTH VE IMPROVEMENTS, STREET, UTILITIES k a FROM, PINE STRUT SOUTH TO SR 104 A N D "Cl T Y 0 F_ EDMONDS, WASHHN4 TO N PINE STR t-�-'7 -cam' }`+ -c� TM� .t C �7"AL 'c=� P...,1i'4."4O.'1-t'.� ��r -4I. 1�-�4'vV'" 'I/4-I\�"�-r:.\ ,-��14.,. .�5, 1.I. !I ')I"'�I�"- t �aW�1, ---,,z..A'.1%�. ' -. *"-i�. -�,�-'".t-T-�1I ".-.1,.,-4.4m �Ip� e'�I I -.,, Il""1S'l.I D. r 0t,. r. ".��oI7V�, .1'P4 ? 1_'I... ..I VI;6. 0Il"A-- (4.T-'-.:I ,�pI. , ',:--.�.'t:I. A1-?I ,-rIL'.4',�0 ..V-.00�&f 1,-T".... 0- .. �...;. ' i.� I4 . "�I.(-I,4.7 I1. k: cjcm© Ii. ; 1, . # y� p '-L.--�F�;":4�/4�I��I).... , . "- -�-.- - I I;fI 1��4.�' I �. 'P�.4:-I.I--'-. ,:'NI.-.I5I-�II . 1L1!7..' .-I.II. 1I�I �.I,e �'�!I,4I11� . -I tII (Z�. .. "�'1"�..... �.,--� - .�-4�-. ..'�� II- .I. I 1... .I, .I -,-. � 7� *-\ .Ie. .-�I I-� �I . , . I I .I I�- �. . �-. - --�I..I .�.�- I . I' �j ;. I�.I.A .r�-.. I'\-'5 I- -. � , �� ...� I.tI,I -�m.14 111'-I�,I-1. ," , -..1- N-II.I . I� - . IILI 1II� . I\I I�2 I1�, 1-1 ,.vi/I-II , IIIA.. T�I �� I . .�I 'I. 7 I� . . I .I .'�I . I 'I..;/I'. ,I qI . IL - - It..I"' 11.�,.1� '�,-t� 1II . t�'4,.,11 -.I ' I. -."� .'1� - .I ?.� �t . *�.�. i7�I� 'r".�'I1.wn ...I.�..., I�.-....y .- I . ...I" -AI ' I. . u �...,1 - -I ..41�'-" I.I' , II.�I -' . I . "..ILII'I,0 --A�11�.I%II'.. II.�7I I!I. � -I . , 'i� �-l1.,,I-,5-.1.. I � lI I1. -. , \ �l-I� ". I �I:�..'I. r--- *�II- I -I., I. I. ., - -�.. I- . . I . \ . t-I-1I, f�. I .�7III.0 c�\. I I�.�- I1� hI .-\I,s I I'. . . 1.'.-,.IcI -- I . . .I.� . I, . � I � . -I� I . I. )' .' I- .- I' . �� I�� I .�' I. I. I I I�.� '... - �I.:.�II q�. I � �p, c\I-.-II\ I .I , -I.I I-. I I II� :I� 1.��- . - "II�. N.I�I - I 1.. '1. . 111I. .I 11.?P1.� ... �/ .. �.I .".O I. ..- I.. . .. III ... . ., �.I.I.q 4�I ,� . I ..�" I. I . 0...I1I� 1"" .-I 0 .I�� b.� . I ...\. .. 1.- I1I1. 1. : II.I I I I I..�I.. I.I � �fl,I4 ... . , I 1. I1I.II . I.I . ,11.I If .. II .�, 1I.1I \. �I1t . 1. \ . .I��.I. I .. -.I.� I ..I \ -I. . I I -I""� . �.o.. A.�1-'1 .�.. w ./. N ..I.4 WM.. >-�.\z� (�.o-II I4I I 0.�- �II �, � 3.0r..) vz. I I.� -� 1.,,_1.I+.�.--I -o-ZI�IIN:4. ;.z-., . . ItI I 7a 5� 1I�. I Z--AII -'-.rWI. o -1I1,11 .'-- I� . I-� I.A.I . . .' I �... -1. 1-1�.II .-. Z �-.L�- �I.- ��.II . 1.I.. .I � I. .I I: I ,L-L�I�I I .. - .-. I 1 I--..�I ). --.�,� �-. .�-." .�,. I I,I0'I . . \'I.I� -I� I I��. --6). .. I I 1. L.� � I . -1.I,. . ' "I .. .. dfI .'PI. E... - L.� !.. I. . ..�1.. I . .-A1� "I.I- I-t- 4....I . . I �II � II Iq -I. �III��t�.�11III ( . 11I1 i I I , . .I��;%Ae'" :5�.P?Z" s�1*I'1)I 1/I\�:� .F'' . .-I1I',> -�)1*1� x- , 11 � <0 , .��. .. 411,�?� i .-� ., --��i%- I.I lr I 4 .11I�I .� ; I1I:.�;' I . �I 1<�t \1. I.. II�'I �. r/..�� . 'P A4L-lI, .I,l I',-.'�� de�!�-�"r4 �-�� .Ic �tj� I\(t'I��'A)Ij,"�- .I-d�II S�0-.- Ir:� I - '. .f 1� i .I I 0"- ..' f1.. ;I�.I 'k� Q--0V . zI� ' . ;I�. 1. I. ' _. , .� ..1 . I .. I .�I . ,- ..I. II'. �I 1'. �-.(M I-- . I I �II.�i�. b -;�.I�t �� ,.,.-�� '\-- �4.-"' -'��,'(4'��I,,,I- 1.-�'-,� .� ,, �I",�- ,,�iII 99--1I.`e'�"rh".'-�O. Y1.�,- �,".1...,,,I�: ,'.-I-'1L,* 1. �,�.� _+4�+-2I� ;L,N 8 '..-�J"�1-II. i.j -.�!.4) .I�.'pi"!-'I'�� . �_,0�-�v-''0,�)�%"1.,!L��.�L;L!1I ,-IL,..IIr"1- . '-II-i--. �rFe, .,i .II,I�'CII� ��..- . -",f ''1� ,. 5��, -.� �:��' e'"0.*- I';I�,l 'cc.Io,; . I IA , '- �� -. ,.4I1 . q, -.�.. P7'-� a�'"_-1�.� --.)M .- .I NI�I-.I J pnL4 �IvI. �,1SI-01.I,,..'.�'-1i�I '.-V.e�-I. '4.I 2?. .:1. �,:)-;I I' ..Ml.4 I/ j--�a',�i#.P*4V'',�-: �II1I.. TM� -II.,II �. -'.� '� " &,Y� .�A I T�1It "- ''. .4�-�I;.��-AI EI 'I,II -"v 1T, o'�-".;: I.I 'I..."r4,' '. -. ..'-!,,U�-",'�IIt. �'I"4. A ,I'c. 1..� I..� A4� 6... - I . -� r4-... I .. . H-1 q c*�eu.\Im ... . A. 1LveT:M.c. T.. .N - . Fcz,e�4�. ... I �.. .v-. I." ,. i I .�� ". .."I . . I .jriI(!'�4�" �I 1. . U<,. -�L. .-INI :IC ,I.I T .5III46- I .�I '"Ia.I-. 1 P�I I.:-l' 1.q� -.I.I r'.I� I.'I II ..� .. 9,�v.I . M .I". Iz '.. '.e4I..4. 1.O . 1 ;. - 1.r I". m . �. �45II,G - .I I 5 �.AI ..rI. .I-II�7 I , � 4I. I. I.0 .I t.J..- " . .� �.��.r. .4 . . I � M ., II . ,�1. . I -I ,.V�1. . 115�.1.� I I.'. I ..�I. -1.II, .0.. I.�.. ... II .� I.. . 'I1L 4.,. .1I #0.II i I ... II II . 'I .W. .5. .II0. ..�. i. ' ,I . � I � 4II. .I "I. ..'. . ,�� 1. �.. �. I.... � .. .I I �� ..I II � ..�. �-�-'"��'"�'i�-!,,�"1- . '��1�"I �' '�'v ,"��,�'.,'I.I"�- ��, ''i�:I -;"�f, I�II'I" -�'- .x,'.�4,-",��-'I'�*"*�''-�'I.rI I �',-I''1� ,.'��I �", - 4 " I �",.w- 1-.-,'"'.I"'� �,r�� "��''IC-II-�1-:;1�'-' I�� ''. � 11I1' "'T"-1I'" I''",i;�.4�''I "�-:,�A,�, ,t�"," :-.t;'"' -��'��!: -�-.'' ',�1I�, 1l V']��1I ,I ��.:..�':-.1YI "�,e"�.- �;�,'4- �- "'.v"i +1' ,i f�'' $* '-,��.fV�'j, 1''i1 ji'� II :�:')�'I"I 1%I.I ' �. , -I ;I IL aIiI -� I I "' I, ."��.I�1,!"-I , ''-�"� 'I �:-I '� "';:�,,1'. .��-'�'-'' t''.� :,1.-I -: �1. '.'��'�-1,; -I�rI I �'-,II,.--I.-' I�.� I:-',1s.��.�,.'I-�. . ''"-' � ' r��'.'f ,I"I .,-'".�"-l�IN.. I'�-%- ,r 1 �,� 1-I-':� 4':�*ls:1..�,.'� " a �I�" . � e,I,'-�M'. 1�,r"1�'" '1I ':1.�' " ". I,-�".�'� ',W'' j,:;k��"Il.';.�'I �.. I 1-1�!'', ',�;� 4I-�,� �1,,IC",:9." . �E�. 0�4'!, , D"- 1�,:,," -010 ft1I�"� ' ,i. '.: -'',I''�L, �A"�- �.7 � �,.'� �- ",".I,:-1", .-.. �-, 'I1 ,� I �,1�,-:� :-" -.""':. -, '�-,''..'"' , .''.,�-- I 1I ,'::�.-'"�. I.��11, : ::.-',.:''I,'"''''I 1�!'., �'" -1''-r 1%;.I1I.�,�I�1�J'"�I-'-.I�, ',::"1�I"- "I I"I� 1��,1I �"�.1 0,#-1, , t�:-''",%'"Id" - :'�"t.':'-"�4,, el iI 14 -w e ) ; r ,It� `' Ar � 1 1 -t- ,,, M lI -I � I.�4 . I - .III.f 1mII. -II�....�,. � �* .�. . -II..I - . � / * , yr t "� - . 'y (ram! .yry► -I 1 ,/! 4 `*'k .• . ! '�f; "i� ,��'�-r': 1 ,--1�", ��1"'�','�'z-�I'"�'"�,�,�'��." . - - ` ��-.'`'� { („fit t"" '� 4r - ~ ^ - i { 5 Z�� ., i%§,,n F .3 s ' -.. .� . ..I. �� . .a*M�. .. �� .I--.�I ',',�',�'I��:�",;"I'"',I :1c�,�I-"::: i // /f a \ � I',";.' .......' '' I "-��.-�. I- , -,�'1" ." I .%-1I -:ZI:�-,-�' ,'' �I��', Y �.. A , '..I,.!I..- 'I�..�I �.I4�,. . .. ,I ,�1.I... .I -, .I "...I'..I ."-�-7-.".. II I7-. � T7i(.", . �ZI.1 q"I. . e *. 1. ,1M,. -�.'1,.* . I - .,I �. ".., -I � -.."I. I. �1 - I,I - I W�I .: ( �AI "��'I .I� - I� 0, .. I . �.� ,. .1 ."./II. -- I.. .. -. I.. 1.--.i.--I A --. + ., ,�' 6-.� i.�. . �_ -. . I .P 1�-t- .e� - .-� I . I i�I ,I.I-II ' - - I..- . ..4.'�.,I1-�/'1-� 0..--III9---II II... .-I. , . -. . 40� .I... � � .�. .Im- . I. I F.I. . .;�.0 -. I. M I iI.-,'l . . .. . . 1' .�I . l,1�. . 'I1III. . -. .I. . ; .H-I*t)'III�I �Ii� ..:I, . .� :..I��/ z As�t l ... 1 . .. I . 1I.m . .-�.-'A.I.I-I � , .If " \--:II.. I . �I.��"1�-, I 1' ,'�I'.'�'i -'I .- �t�jI -7 "�' LI ,'.iII-�- I,I�L'I";t i1. - ,�,� ":� ". ��","�1 '11.: ��' ,�II ,1I'-:II .I 4 '�"�'�'"I. '. '---"��' I%-.�" ��'I'' 1-..;,'�" '�-'� �� i';'i��1- . i,'-* '.-',"',.'i�'4 -' . ',"I ..�,.�-':1�' �,';i�-�'��"�""" �, I�:I-$.�,,,t��'1. ''-'"Z,��1""II% � I'''""A"-''.�:".'.-.-1,,-1::"''�-�'1,O",-'',"��,"��.,'��, ', .�1��-,"�','-"-'�,:�. "�""�I, -.I1' `," ,",,-:"I` '�'',111�''.''" -"%"- ��"'� '"-:�' �.'1I ---" -.'"�V'II, :W""n-: I .,VI -�I,,-7",_'-':I �-;,�l4 ",','%1'�',� ,� ''�--"-,.,�'� '�'��'.��.11 I .""�,;1�""I'�'II�- ','�"-! " � .":I."�,'",-��.'�,"�i"�"I- ,-;; " ' .,'"'-".,""�,�_":"-��1.�"'''_I �'"'-:',''�.'"�;:,,--,- ;�-�I''�','t��'� .I''"�",-�"� ,��'-.��A:''-��.e�''."1,�""';,,,I "1 11, . ��1 I`* '," I",,, ' ,� yy,. �QJ J3 �yyr.,+i jyy`� ;',/�y)�`�[,E �y,,Aw� y Y �.�1.,,,41 "" �..w- v \ . ` _ - _ M "mil WrtF • " t ` I"'� 7 \ i/ / r #� + .y` �}!1 ,i ' `' t ,E �F�e �� jj VR tee•} y/{y' i I `a' . / r . . - lu . yt E $[ �rray.}�/q Jr i? fi x r / ,{! ,� F z =�- I _ _ 1'�Vf j �,,�Jjj yy✓'j,�i ;�►/y��j j/�y y,�,y� t',� +'• t y .p * �#y,, 3 .� h .rr. _ �. VVMM�� }\/{rjy[ � �+, M�i.A t - 1 - FI �.%' "J ! ^' > . # .>' V-Wi�r��N�W"�� \ xa _ k Y» c. - ..� era 1- y s t o- .laic t u ex �- - 'C1 uiy a - y i,- ,� ,r,�' td 'l. jai ,.. #,� - - - t'7� ��i - I�- ��/# �`) ,)' ,>;'r < �_ �1 it i I:-�� 1. .I I . � " _. '__� ._..r_-.IT''I..,,,_,, �.... "... I ,. V�. I "1"' I ��!' �.�--, - ' --'.... " "I ' , � ��1. . �. 7 .'I I' . - .I L'. ' -; I , I -I�,'. -, �. ' -!��,4 w�� mPi�. =.��1 - .I I g�-"--�� l�,� "I . w I w1J�1WjI,,Q't: 1-j-=11-' �-�-,1, I ,� -- -. ��-�.-' -; ,�- ---.-,I --1 . I. . - I m, � r. . .10,11 11 -4� *I wI:o�o!o �A4, �1I!-61'0(- -;' I- I .. . I 1;I/. � 6--�I l.- -1 �I"�'. 1I -, 1II 1, -1.� 0I - 11 , .� " I .I - .I 11 I �- I n�I �Io. � I m"p- m"I b.mm'-;- rm, m' . ' mI� �w_I -.'m-mI " j-. . r.--. --. II . �.-..4��I1m-I. I I 'I � .. -I . I I I 11 . �I - I.� wIa . -IM"-� I II .I I II I,L �" I �� ,I , I :II". I . S'' II. Ti11. �IE,1. I�I * I �'..� �,I � . I� 11 I � I��'�: ,11,." . I :,I ��" :,:. � I L'"-'!I 7I 4�. � � , 7� I '" ,�' �/ ( C d$ h l �t I.I t y�� \,, I �! � � f 7' A } k l g . s fig ' r ;, " 4 _ O L� - , , ' r ¢ { "t lit n x>#da' x . pry t _ ��i��'� t :n## `'S; ?tv.., .`� iaulq�u t"�+sn�'L i r rrr., �VSi� r�°.3: 1u11 ,J 111n ✓y 3°5, s *' Y�r i ��j , "I� ` _ j - ir? h' f Y .` f - fit i , 1 3 rt.,,"� x )- .�3 i vs yx i •' +1 L '%S ' .. . E //� jj{� 6@�,'j, ( (/�rW� - /lam ,/ i . k:.r- �"II. .I I I It - �9I I.III .. . . .. . ..-6.. .. �I... . - ' 't . ,e .. ."k ti, � ,: j ` +a' �i w 1 . . ' I 9 � �. PULL CHAIN See"" 7a A4A,N • `I � ...� I 2 _ ORIVEb5AV 5(A1Zf19CtE LEy1El- to l n6r� .. . , • , - _: � 1- t #. ' .) I � .Z I t �' ` .* u , y IC4t*6t AOOtC 1'. IH OY9RI�[Ap✓ /t oR CAP . la" �" tXl%r/Ne`.t` I .d .' x ;3,�,; . I ... . ' . .;. . . I�..lII I. I.II - . � *...I . II I // I II I ./.I 4(, , ..I. 2.�I.I.��I.Ii�I....I..I.I.. � %... ZJI.. I.1, . .II.'I I. -.*-I -II1.-I. . I�� -' .'I-1 ': 1....�. � .j-. .I-'i I!-I.�- . I t:...l.�I.1%-� . �.V.I :I I e- : I 41- I II .. ..1�, II I �II t-I :.I1I� -,� I.1 .I � II .I.I � .. .0 -F 1I . 1I -z .1-'"- a i tii._ - 'a . p �11 N <<y7,/� I t , �'r y �'z fit; �.,'.:. : -- . Q-- 7)TE 153 54V x 3o.,X 3#„ C .g. , I i� l %I., 1,. WI ...II ' . - iKIq'.II� I.-� f, .,. I'..r .4I� 1-II. kII . )I..I'e-'� 1I..�IIN.I �� I1-%, �v.��. ."V . 1�I I �-.-.... --�I,1I Ig1 1: 'I-- � 1 1IZ., I t I. .� , 1I,.II. ',- I I \p r�.-II. . I iIIM. . (�Ie.. - I --.� ",. ;1;;-'-1'.I.1. :A . --I ' I i 7'\. 1-�. ..' � \ t-,. . - � . ,I�I; I rI .I-\. .II�\.I. L1I.I-�-I , .�L.' . AI ..,, ,.I..� .-I-.�. O.II... I_ -.I I '\II% I -.- . \..., � I - .. . f .; p _ CONTROL- MAN HC LC- NTs. � `. I- �� I r. I-1. 1I.io.. 1i1.�I .I lr. II.i-r It�[�..1. ��1.-I �I -�.-1 .I�I .III�-Ab'. �.�-.II��..�r. � I ' 14 .�.�..,-84I.1I .�. I- I - .I.. I 1I 1�;. '.. - �. .*I 1tI .- ) -... -I1 I- I' .- ? �.I- �.I e .. I I')I � . II.I, . I. . .r.I.I - --.".-. t. �II�.I -7�I..I.-��;t .oI� • 1 � ,� , t . i- , r ' • f I ' h ,; �,. % , 'fi+1GT+t tZ'S , . I { i �' - - , . .- --- ---�- "- f.. r '•y+. Y ' '":.. ,� I i �``� goof : P�t Nth -To . f2 q s ap , �'.. �' 1O� 'j ""C�'`'' : \'O 16.. ilOv PowRts _ _ V�' 0 ,RECEIVED A' ®�. &i' - r , c„ 4r.r �. err ' '"' . � �N < . �' ENGINEER G f >t � t�lr 1 �tt� . .. � 3 V �� "... � � � j � .r +*ems., I t +�s ? f t � ) - � 7 V , < , . L�',7 .. M $'te x i } � '4 L �..-.y t R �'�; (h 4-�+ S xi h' �i _ L' . 6: '+4 t . .. . ,7}! • .. _ . ,. I,.J,A ,yyy C� .ry+�.,a� . 1 8 �. „„ ,, +rt lam;» ,.�,•. " � � �;* r , _.. _, .../ c , z .i. - .. r - - Y }.„. ? i r L) IN pi. ��. �w. _ . �u >. , ,, . „, � ' , ..�. �.�t :. `� �., - �,._, .. .. .. I, �� J t ! Ff. 'fit* 'W ., r.. ,�m if . .- . . . v` rz ,r•. . - ... Y r` "l "u" it `3 ` "' r . .. _ ., .e.. •+� •: ' y� ,.>.. . �. �- :' '((j�" � ��. ., ,ra-- . -,{; �+. .,fir �k , v^ . , . ,`L/ .' . S � ;} µ , - Nam`;' �_ - . a> _ .9. P '� 1 w . �: +, 7AM7� W 4. .. l_,) 1 6 I. � � .1. I �1. I. I..I, IL= :.1 r . I.I I )I�) III� , I II �. . �IrI .1 -I --. ."I II'l""I'll""-I'll'lI l"I "I'll"��I .�� I . I .I�" -11 " 1II.."I , u . Y' �, 2 4 .:-. , i ' . .. , - .sF. . . . 1 �)', U t>3t r .E TIL d �v FObTIN cun1Pn�rt ufcci� AT Fca � ,, , ,'," NG sg�u", i>i?tttS l4tZ Cr �-„uG Grer4u.r �.��r 4�I 1. EI .: -� '''- '4 .r- ! � F/� 'L,I ':. , r +,� r; . r, ,.. .. . . , . . .-t' , . 'J. $. y. - .. „ - . . ' J€ xy yy . ti. -. - (. ,.,, i . , ,..1 . -, ..r .. J •:.. - _ -