The URL can be used to link to this page

1116 DALEY PL.PDF11111111111111 10709 1116 DALEY PL ADDRESS- 11 I Ul —t\ fn 1 Q (A I k (D _ TAX ACCOUNTMARCEL NUMBER: Da-1—I ` -9 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED)FOR:UVlA I UAI Am GI, IA� z MUci R. %OOZo qb9 b�okb tW CRITICAL AREAS :gl - % DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: Y ' Gcm'3 ((cAitacw6kr,6c ),_ V 'qu' I (sLooe) DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:a ;Qi OV IOJ �k PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: -Z2 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: �1 710I 1 K/Li/01 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: !-�Z3 SHORT PLAT FILE: �(�,_,�'+�' p % LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: [ I I ! 0 SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: b 1�I `N GEOTECH REPORT DATED: W�k STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LATEMP\DSTs\Fonns\Street File Checklist.doc i 1 h. 2CEs c' c u� m peO-{ N x � C N..; � �.�rQ'vie::5 +�FMI''a ra.Ciit�s' N cd O , A s . 1 48 x eh i RECEIVED ERIVill APPROVED BY PLANNING See K- 2,000 - 7 t Z / Co ct kbc4 m ATTACHMENT 4 APPROVED BY PLANNING See K- 2,000 - 7 t Z / Co ct kbc4 m ATTACHMENT 4 -District City'. E' m rids Water ~Departm`�nt TAP CAkD i Reading: 0000 Date No. 9,21 No. Meter 31 11 Tap, j Size 4 Size Mfgrs. No. Or Style Senses SRC Purchaser: Xd Serv. Add. 1116 D(ll,Pb Lot No. Blk. No. Add. Residential: Other: Meter location Service -Materia L o � O� -hl r YPress ire lbs. Test % Date of Work i OUTGOING Index Reg. —'Route Bk: ' Stencil Card INCOMING Index Reg_ Route Bk. "Stencil- Card. k ROUTING SLIP; NEW SERVICE I N�STAUATIQ&-)-.-;,, ADDRESS: PC, DATE:c F 2W nT A T A,. T-%Tf- 4; P.U.D. TELEPHONE CABLE T.V. GAS FOREMAN STORM SEWER HER C�✓'" FUTURE SERVICE INS 3� 'NO BORE: CUT: LOCK CREW INITIAL: DATE- /01 INITIAL: .�,w/r* 2-03 - ACCOUNT N-UMBER: METER SHOP SUPPLIER: A Q ATMENT PLANT FOREMAN E B L T FOREMAN INITIAL: DATE: A/ TAP CARD METER SHEET' APPLICATION/. UTILITY DISPATCH PATCH BILLING ,2 7/76 ----------- -PFt0PE*RrYL*M- .260 7 .250 EX1511116 C-RAVES' -T? 1A Of r 245 p 2to 4y 4 9- AGGESS ASE 4ENT aD 1116 DALEY PLACE j- p .0� /c-A An O Lu LZ co LOT AREA: Learj m o (9 11,904 5G.FT✓ Lu Lu LOT C-OVERA&E P) a v 240 29,75-SO.FT (lq.q%) IMPERVIOUS. 5URFACE -7%) 5420 5G.FT (28. ED i,-o'i;nLiry C-ASjr:r-,cw F,rorr-r.TVL*lr-- R al AcNurlen -tt.;CT STATE OF SHINGTON rnrjT C471-irr, STYLI r4ATrJ:t SIETr--R i -- - -- ----- IVIT APPROVED by PLANNING 2l9 R E C E I V E: Ln JAN 17 2001 PLOT PLAN i- = 20-=o DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTP. CITY OF EDIVIONDIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT #4, FLAT -'OF HARBOR HILLS, CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, rAA5HIN&TON ('111(o DALEY PLACE) TAX ACCOUNT #774q-000-004-000'7 RECEIVED HEIGHT 0 CALCULATIONS 2 0 + (E3).�," + (c),2aa.o + AvEPAcr= (:uT 1 T W:- OF .23-7--m AUG 0 6 2001 io �,A T -rNVED 5y 4 = AVERAGE GRADE OF 240*5 + 25-0" lAAX BUILDING HT OF 2"-.68' 27-2, 1 S, PERMIT COUNTER STREET FILE �� 1: '+c., •�•�..•.�•-.r v..-.-ry.,�.o..d'�•'� y+rw .�h., s..-/.. .:-i�'.e�.. •.�,,h. _,�5,•T=.. ,, ,. ,, F; .:'�.i,.---`n•.,. b-1 �.., �1 City of Mm nds SIDE SEWERPERMIT, Address of Construction: ..,,w wT.+y.w'a'i`a'riaY...`•W ow11 ••'�in�+.eZ'��',", PERMIT NO. 0117 �I _l' PERMIT EXPIRES,�L1�2-. Property Tax Account Parcel No. 7 q��00y �q 0 UAtt. Attach copies of all access and utility easements Verified and Approved by Owner and/or Contractor: %d e , .jj AQ Contractor'License A C 7 7- n R .X 6 4 i U U Building Permit # El'OS-i'ngle Family Invasion into City *Right -of Way: ❑ Yes �o . ❑ Multi -Family `(No: of Units ) *RW Construction Permit # ❑ Commercial (No. of Units ) Cross other **Private Property: ❑-Yes To ❑ Public **Attach legal description and copy of recordedeasement. n,—\ 17 Owner or contractor signature and acknowledgement statement:.. Date, By signing for this permit I certify. that I have read the City's public handout entitled ide:.Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. .CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-42.1 5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVAT•I�ON R FORjNSPECTION CALL 425-771=0220 extensiond 2 VIS 24 HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS..... - . NOTE: IF JOB -SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 •RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED. ;Job Site Ready YES. NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial:• FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: Initial: As -built to Street File: f3,. PERMIT MUST BE POSTED; ON JOB SITE: r ' r White Copy; File 'Green Copy, Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant f L;temp;bidg;fo7ssspertnitjlg4/00 9 i IV DECK 14' C/O 22' C/O 6X4 Y CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS 1116 DALEY PL PERMIT NUMBER 9546 H❑ME❑WNER KEITH DIBBLE C❑NTRACT❑R XXXXXXX DATE 09/19/01 DRAWN ISMAEL ABILA • • NAME:_ SITE ADDI PROJECT I. S& .. PLANNING DATA REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: MAP PAGE: CORNER LOT: es / o W 2 FLAG LOT: Yes / o CHK#: 01 - ZONING: }- S, 12- CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION M I c)97 - or 8 UStudy Required: C22f4 - 7°""" bt o/- fwq (bee • M'_ a iIN ra anoa ❑ Waiver / ❑ Conditional Waiver V- 199g _ r s'h y V- j ea, _-71 ,V /'� Ne rw ��. �y S+v.N. .ti� j. *�c(„c _ nt�a ,c CA V14_ ti bt lZ S' le ✓sK _ — 9�n. a� SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form . M r y ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) V ' ❑ Exempts) IV -- SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Street: 25' Left Side: Co- Right Side: i s Rear: ZS Actual Setbacks: ,4µ1 Street: ' 5L' Left Side: /7 Right Side: ? Rear: 39' Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes / No / DNA) ~ 0 DETACHED STRUCTURES: 0 ROCKERIES: ® FENCES/TRELLISES: ® BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: 0 STAIRS / DECKS: PARKING: Required: Actual: M` LOT AREA: 06 BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point: I/b �'""�` Datum Elevation: Maximum Allowed: —Act ual Height: A.D.U. CREATED?: No / Yes No SUBDIVISION: D"u.,, 910'a LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: Yes / OTHER: Plan Review By: NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC PLANNING DATA NAME: } a yi, O; bbl,, SITE ADDRESS: Dah P(, DATE: 3/S/2ter ZONING: PIS - ► Z PLAN CHK#: DI ` Of 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 6,M I A N&w �i+�^i (e - F�,►,sbti, ('e,sy M( CORNER LOT N- (Yes/No) FLAG LOT Na (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: -S' Left Side: to' Right Side: I v Rear: 7,5' Actual Setbacks: _ Front: 2-5' Left Side: (3 ` Right Side: 1 °• 5 `. Rear: 39' Street map checked for additional setback required? 190 -WJ41,4 (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) . LOT COVERAGE: 2 378 Maximum Allowed: 35 `z Actual: i i 9o4d BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: 251 Actual. Height: 2-1 Datum Point: tvw'--u_ 'r .D6)a,,, Placd Datum Elevation: 2-29, A.D.U. CREATED?: an RA-4 ts, bAxe—u- f w,- r, a <V.►% th fib ( B Sdtm.wG�l 0. 1r P�1 .i Xlrk4,N- h /) rv+`/t� SUBDIVISION: *(%r I-Pli l,r 19 4 -- 4JNI*'A jam, f^Ci 0. a-k I g, �-P I/- b"L,nAL; 7r-ae.r 7W (tS t�W�c r) ;s {•• la t �q� - a u .�ia.. o Mr ofkyFi 0144 (Mrt� ) CRITICAL AREAS #: g %-I9R- Ste, r IM1hZtt. vd p s6ac h l 6&, .. V_, j—+ 1 f GO w. ,�A% - 0 N% �SEPA DETERMINATION: Iasi r-A„ _'51z c,, , .SSW A k/f$' 4-W Qu _m (, p;--& 511- Na)- LOT AREA: It 904 a OTHER: V-Z000--f- 6Ctewr GahsH,.cNIa. .5' a6 Sal Sso�c Gar �lol ofen kA4r a aW t mo- a `�, o,.Yt,ro, A¢ t ra + � c►.cd..r4. ' ti 4 �.°G'�'g W S S' c CcNf /ajmv� ? `i4 SNrrr Scyba�cj h 3--9 No �~— Les( Plan Review By: acu,s b ,y C.- ila\permit%4plandat.doc 1Wy — 4� cdn X l 92"A K (n, (arc k.w) . 0 % bu-, C LE NO. - 1 otical Areas Checklis -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topogra by/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: .770, - 000 ooq - OD 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 12, 1,97 4. Is this. site currently developed? dyes; no. If yes; how is site developed? `;Z,,.&1,> r_ ,....�h rr,:t: • .F i,�'' f: �',:. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. +f Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: rL.cr" ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: - ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway ;; . , floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? .,A c? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed; urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ----------- ---- For. City: Staff Use .Only ---------------- --.--- ----_ 1. Site is Zoned? S "" " . . / /5 Zj s a �-c r 2' SCS mapped soil type(s)? :.�c:.� ��u�r �� C ouM 3. Wetland inventoryor C.A. ma wetland resent on site? p indicates , . p tsf 4.... Critical Areas inventory- or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site. /V, 5 Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?.�� Site designated.on..the Environmentally. Sensitive Areas Map? w:: ....:.............. DETER11i1INATION ^ca_chkdoc; Rev 02/11/97 City of0monds "kW CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable -City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: M Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date c:reception\jana\cac1.doc ' Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telep e (.�,-,✓_..fits'... 1\'"a ''�_cr?.r'..�.�� ._t?`i.�i Signature Ira 7 Date (over) � _ A • J GEOSCIENCES INC. Post Office Box Q385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Telephone (425) 8Q7-1084 Facsimile (425) 828-9443 kJ fl Peterson Custom Homes P.O. Box 12734 Mill Creek, WA 98082-0734 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report Gnanaragah Residence Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Dear Client: C7 I1 c } J L r ��•:Jt� Job Number 8046 June 4, 1998 RECEIVED JAN 1 1 2001 BUILDING DEPT. We are pleased to present our Geotechnical Engineering. Report for the proposed new residence to be constructed on Lot 4, Harbor Hills in Edmonds, Washington. The purposes of our work were to professionally evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions, recommend general procedures for the grading and underslab treatment in the buildings, and recommend foundation parameters for shallow wall footings. The scope of our services included: 1) Logging and sampling three test pits excavated to a maximum depth of 12.0 feet below existing grades. The test pits were located in a manner to provide broad coverage of the site. The test pits were excavated with a rubber -tired backhoe and logged by the undersigned professional engineer. Selected samples were taken of subsurface soils. 2) Reviewing collected soil samples in our office, and assigning appropriate laboratory tests consisting of moisture content, sieve gradation and Atterberg Limit tests. At the conclusion of the testing program, laboratory results were analyzed and compared with field notes and logs. 3). Preparation of this preliminary summary report in accordance with our understanding of project requirements and generally recognized local geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Plate 1, attached, provides the guidelines in the use of this report. Project Understandings: This office was provided with a site plan which noted some site dimensions, topography, and orientation. The new residence was located on this plan. Our knowledge of this project is generally limited to the information on this plan and other information from the builder. We anticipate the new structure will be a wood -frame and multiple storied. We do not anticipate a basement at this time. The structure may be tucked into the base of the slope. ATTACHMENT.5 LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS June 4, 1998 General Site Conditions — Surface: Job Number 8046 Page 2 The proposed new residential structure will be constructed on Lot 4, Harbor Hills (at the end of Daley Place) in Edmonds, Washington. The attached Vicinity Map, Plate 2, shows the general vicinity of the site. At the time of our fieldwork, the flat portion of the site where the house will be constructed was covered with a moderate growth of grass and small shrubs. The slope was covered with trees and other brush.' The proposed building area had a gentle to moderate slope down towards the west. Subsurface Exploration and Description: Three test pits were excavated with a rubber -tired backhoe to a maximum depth of twelve (12.0) feet below existing grades at the locations shown on the Site Plan, Plate 3. The test pits were logged and sampled by the undersigned engineer during the excavation process. The test pit logs are attached to this report. Recovered soil samples were subjected to moisture content, sieve gradation and Atterberg Limit tests. Test results and field density information are summarized on the test pit logs. Although there may very well be some variation in the subsurface and/or conditions may not be readily apparent from the ground surface, we expect the following subsurface interpretation will be essentially correct: The hillside is generally overlain with about 1.5 feet of variable silty sandy duff over very dense gravelly silty sandy glacial till. The proposed building area is underlain with around seven feet of loose, soft compressible sandy colluvium, compressible silt, or highly . variable fill. Underlying these loose, soft, compressible soils is gravelly silty. sand which becomes very dense with depth. There is abundant groundwater seeping through the proposed building area. The final test pit logs attached to this report present our interpretation of the field data and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration location. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. The relative densities and moisture descriptions. on the logs are interpretive descriptions based on observed conditions during excavation. The logs should be reviewed for specific subsurface information at each location tested. • • LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS June 4, 1998 General: Conclusions and Recommendations Job Number 8046 Page 3 The following general geotechnical conclusions can be drawn from our field and laboratory test data: 1) The native medium -dense to very dense gravelly silty sand at about seven to nine feet below existing grades can provide adequate bearing to the structure. 2) We recommend the entire proposed building area be over -excavated to dense competent native soils and the entire excavation be filled with two to four - inch quarry spall rock (or approved equivalent) which is tamped into place with the back end of a trackhoe bucket to a dense unyielding condition. Footings would bear directly on top of the spalls. 3) The over -excavation prior to the placement of spalls should be sloped to drain to a collection point where positive drainage to an appropriate drainage structure would be provided. 4) Slabs -on -grade should be underlain with at least six inches of free -draining sand. In addition, a visquine barrier is recommended. 5) Soils with a high percentage of silt and/or clay (>15%) are moisture sensitive and difficult to impossible to utilize as structural fill is the soil is more than two to three percent wetter or drier than the optimum moisture content at the time of compaction. The soils at this site do have considerable silt, and are moisture sensitive. 6) The slope appears stable at this time and we expect it to remain so provided the recommendations in this report are implemented properly. Foundations: The proposed new structure may be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on the densely compacted spalls which are tamped into placed with the back end of a trackhoe bucket. Alternatively, the footings may bear on the competent native dense to very dense gravelly silty sand which is about seven to nine feet below existing grades. All footings should bear at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below existing grades. A bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) psf may be assumed for footings bearing directly on the compacted spalls or native dense gravelly silty sandy glacial till. The design .bearing pressure may be increased by one-third to accommodate short term wind and seismic loads. To provide protection against shear failure, we recommend continuous and spread footings have minimum widths of sixteen (16) inches and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. ti i� LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS June 4, 1998 Job Number 8046 Page 4 Quarry spalls that are placed under footings should extend out beyond the edges of the footings a minimum distance equal to one-half the fill depth. For example, -if two feet of quarry spalls were placed under a sixteen -inch -wide footing, the total minimum width of the fill (and therefore the footing excavation) would be forty inches. We estimate that footings bearing on dense compacted spalls or dense to very dense gravelly silty sandy glacial till will settle approximately one-half (1/2) inch between building corners or for every fifty feet of continuous footing distance. Lateral loads such as wind and seismic forces are accommodated by friction _between the foundation elements and the bearing soils and by passive earth pressure against the foundations. However, passive earth pressure is only available if compacted structural fill is used to backfill against the foundations, or the foundations are poured against the existing soil. The passive resistance of undisturbed native soil and. properly compacted structural fill may be assumed to be an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Seismic Design: The site is classified as Seismic Zone 3 b the Uniform Building Code. We recommend Y g the designer utilize site soil coefficient Sc in their analysis. Site Drainage: The site should be graded during construction so that surface water is directed away from any excavation. Water should not be allowed to pond where foundations, pavements, or slabs are to be constructed. Final site grades adjacent to the buildings should be sloped away from the structure for a minimum distance of ten feet. Roof and surface water drains should discharge to an appropriate facility. The over -excavation should be sloped to drain to a suitable collection point where seeping groundwater would be collected and tightlined to an appropriate drainage facility. If spalls are not placed, footing drains are required and should consist of a slotted four - inch -diameter PVC pipe bedded in, and covered with a minimum of six inches of drain rock The invert of the pipe should be placed at the elevation of the footings. A non- woven geotextile fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or other equivalent) should be wrapped around the outside of the drain rock. The PVC pipe should be sloped to drain, and may be connected to the roof and surface water discharge pipe down -gradient and away from the structures. The pipes should discharge to an appropriate discharge facility. LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS Job Number 8046 June 4, 1998 Page S Excavations and Slopes: Temporary and permanent excavation and slopes for this project must meet all applicable government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of four feet may be attempted vertical, although they will probably not hold. Excavation slopes greater than four feet in depth should be cut no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical). Flatter slopes may be required depending upon location variations in soils conditions and whether there is groundwater present. Contractors working in excavations should use caution at all times. Sudden caving of the side slopes is possible. Permanent cut and fill slopes which are not otherwise reinforced should not exceed 2:1 (H:V). Foundation and Retaining Walls: Foundation and retaining walls adjacent to the hillside must be designed to support the lateral earth pressures which abutting soils will impose. The following recommendations are for walls which are less than twelve feet high that support level backfill: Active Earth Pressure............ ..40 pcf Passive Earth Pressure .......................300 pcf Unit Weight of Soil ...........................125 pcf Coefficient of Friction ...........................0.40 The Active Earth Pressure recommended above assumes the wall can deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height. If this assumption is incorrect, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred psf should be added to the wall pressure given above. The values recommended above are ultimate values, and should be reduced by an appropriate safety factor. As a guideline, we recommend a minimum Factor of Safety of 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The resultant force from the soil (neglecting the passive pressure force) can be calculated by taking moments about the toe of the wall. The resultant force should pass through the middle third of the footing. The above design values do not include hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads (such as traffic) are placed above, or near the walls. Design values can also be exceeded if heavy. construction equipment is allowed within twelve feet of the wall. If any of these conditions exist, then the. above design values should be augmented be appropriate additional pressures. If walls higher than twelve feet are required for this project, please contact our office for additional recommendations. ti a LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS June 4, 1998 - Job Number 8046 Page 6 Foundation walls should be appropriately waterproofed, and then backfilled with a clean, compacted, free -draining granular soil or an approved drainage composite. This will prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. The wall backfill should contain no more than five percent silt and clay, no organics, and no cobbles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of sand (from the #4 sieve to the #200 sieve) should range from 25% to 75%. 'During compaction of the wall backfill, care should be taken to not damage the wall. The top one to two feet of wall backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil. General Earthwork and Structural Fill: Site construction should begin by stripping and clearing the property of all vegetation, organic -rich topsoil, fill, debris, colluvium; trash, and any other deleterious material. Stripped materials may have to be removed from the site. Groundwater seepage was noted during our fieldwork. The contractor should anticipate, and be prepared to accommodate moderate to very heavy seepage into even shallow excavations. Caving of side slopes is also anticipated in the over -excavation. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils would need to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill (other than spalls) should be placed above unyielding native site soils in maximum eight -inch -thick loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95% of Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557). Soil is typically difficult to.place and compact as structural fill if more than three percent from the optimum moisture content at the time of compaction. During wet weather or under wet conditions, structural fill should consist of a granular soil having less than five percent silt or clay (measured on that portion which passes the 3/-inch sieve). During dry weather, water may have to be added to the soil to achieve the required soil density. Wet Weather Construction: The earthwork portion of this project should be completed in the dry summer months. If the site is developed during extended periods of wet weather or in the winter, the following are anticipated additional costs and changes which should be anticipated: 1) Excavated slopes and fill piles will have to be protected with plastic. 2) All of the excavated soils will be unusable as structural fill. 3) Numerous site visits will be required by this office to evaluate soil conditions, confer with the contractor, and make remedial recommendations. • LOT 4, HARBOR HILLS Job Number 8046 June 4, 1998 Page 7 4) Costs of maintaining the site and cleaning adjacent streets/property will increase. 5) Construction access road reinforcement may be required. This may require additional quarry spalls, geotextile fabric, or some other method. Closure: It is recommended we be retained to review the final development plans to verify site specific subsurface requirements are met and our recommendations have been accurately interpreted in the plans. It is also recommended that we .be retained to provide professional geotechnical consultation and observation services during design and construction. This allows us to: 1) Confirm that design conforms to specific subsurface requirements; 2) Confirm that subsurface soils conditions exposed - during construction are consistent with those indicated by this report; 3) Evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities conform to the intent of the contract specifications and plans; and, 4) Provide recommendations for design changes. in the event of changed conditions. While on the site during construction, we will not direct or supervise the contractor or work, now will we be responsible for providing on -site safety or dimensional measurements during construction activities. It has been a pleasure providing you with our professional services. If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact me directly at 425-827-1084. Thank You: DODDS Geosciences Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Mi a M S. DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. PLATEI GUIDELINES IN THE USE OF THIS REPORT This report for Job No. 8046 was prepared in accordance with local generally accepted engineering principles and standards. No warranty is expressed or implied. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the limited. services which you requested Geotechnical engineering requires the application of professional judgment, as no study can completely quantify subsurface conditions. The owner should seriously consider any recommendations for additional work contained in the report, as it is then our professional opinion that this additional work is necessary to augment and/or fulfill site specific requirements. This report is an informational document, and is not to be used for contractual purposes. Any interpretation of subsurface conditions "in the report including the test pit logs, and/or text discussions are based upon our testing, analysis, experience, and judgment. There is no warranty that these subsurface interpretations represent subsurface conditions other than that which occurred at the exact locations tested at the time the fieldwork was conducted by this firm. Groundwater levels can be especially sensitive to seasonal changes. Ibis firm is not responsible for interpretations others make using this report. The conclusions and recommendations in this report assume that the field tests that were conducted accurately represent subsurface - conditions of the site. If, during construction, significantly different subsurface conditions are encountered from those described in this report, our firm should be notified at once to review these conditions and revise our recommendations as necessary. Also, if there is a significant lapse of time between this report submittal and the start of work at the site, our firm should be allowed to review and verify site conditions. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered during excavation and construction, and simply cannot be fully anticipated by periodic soil- and/or rock sampling at widely spaced testing locations. The. owner should be prepared to accommodate potential extra costs through the development of a contingency fund. This firm "cannot be responsible for any deviation from the intent of this report including, but not limited to the nature of the project, the construction timetable, and any construction methods discussed in the report. The recommendations contained in the report are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as may, be specifically described in the report. This firm will not be responsible for any construction activity on this site, nor are we responsible if others attempt to apply this report to other sites. Job Number 8046 - Plate 1 Guidelines Gnanaragah Residence Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Ihc.1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - Planning • Building • Engineering MEMO January 30'h, 2006 From: Theresa M. Umbaug To: Street File 0 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR RE: Unrecorded "Easement And Development Agreement" received 1/11/2001 Per Jeannine Graf I researched Snohomish County records for a recorded copy of the above document and was unable to locate any documents of this nature under the parcel number of 7749-000-004-0007 nor under the names of Greenebaum or Dibble that have been recorded for this property. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan f AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO Keith A. Dibble RECEIVED Homeland Drive Edmonds WA 98020 BAN 9 1.2001 BUILDING DEFY. EASEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Grantor: Steven E. Greenebaum Grantee: Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Peggy A. Dibble, trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Legal Desc: Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according tolthe plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive Assessors Parcel #: 7749-000-004-0007 This Easement and Development Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this30 day of A ,, s t , 2000, by and between Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998, and Peggy A. Dibble, as trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998 (together referred to as "Dibble"). and Steven E. Greenebaum, a single. man ("Greenebaum"). RECITALS A. WHEREAS, Dibble owns that certain real property legally described as Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, and referred to here as "Lot 4"; B. WHEREAS, Greenebaum owns that certain real property legally described as Lot 3, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, and referred to here as "Lot 3"; C. WHEREAS, Greenebaum already owns an easement over a triangular shaped area of Lot 4, which is located in the southeasterly corner of Lot 4, and which is legally described as follows: Initials: \Q� A49 1 That portion of Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded . in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 4; thence N 0*10' 53" W, along the east line of said Lot 4, a distance of 20 feet; thence S 89° 49' 07" W, a distance of 38.66 feet to an intersection with the southerly line of said Lot 4; thence S 62° 49' 40" E, along said southerly line a distance of 43.53 feet to the point of beginning, and referred to here as "the triangle easement of Lot 4"; D. WHEREAS, Lot 3 and Lot 4 are within the same tract of land; E. WHEREAS, Grenebaum has agreed to grant an easement for access to Dibble and the parties have agreed to into additional agreements; F. WHEREAS, this Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of the agreement of the parties to commence development of the Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. A. Greenebaum's Grant of Easement. Greenebaum hereby grants a non-exclusive easement to Dibble for driving automobiles over the "Easement Section of Lot 3". The Easement Section of Lot 3 is legally described as follows: A parallelogram 15 feet by 14 feet, which lies southerly of the two -car garage to be constructed on Lot 4 and further described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 3, where it meets the Daley Place cul de sac, and proceeding south 627 49' 40" east 55 feet to the true point of beginning, and from the true point of beginning proceeding south 62° 49' 40" east for 15 feet, and then proceeding south 27° 10' 20" west for 14 feet, and then proceeding north 62° 49'-40" west for 15 feet, Initials: UPS_. PS ",q 2 • _ i and then proceeding north 27' 10' 20" east for 14 feet to the true point of beginning, thus enclosing a parallelogram, which is 15 feet on the northerly and southerly sides and 14 feet on the easterly and westerly sides. B. Agreements Regarding the Easement Granted by Greenebaum: 1. The panhandle of Lot 3 running westerly to Daley Place is 14 feet wide, whereas the paved portion of the driveway is 12 feet wide, with an unpaved, two -foot wide strip lying between the northerly boundary of the panhandle section of Lot 3 and the paved portion of the driveway. In the Easement Section of Lot 3, Dibble shall be responsible to maintain the two -food wide strip, and he shall replace the agreed -on material lost with new material of the same size and mix. 2. This grant of easement shall not extend to motorcycles. 3. This Easement Section of Lot 3 shall be used by Dibble solely for driving across as a "turn -around" to facilitate access to Dibble's garage, and not for parking automobiles or storing equipment or leaving anything in it or for any other purpose. 2. Agreement Regarding Existing Water Course Running Across Lots 3 and 4: A. There is a drainage course which runs both across Lot 3 and down from above Lot 4 and onto Lot 4 at approximately 250 feet above mean sea level and then runs across the surface of Lot 4, roughly parallel to the southerly boundary of Lot 4, then under the driveway to be constructed on the southerly 10 feet of Lot 3, and then under the driveway and panhandle on the northerly 14 feet of Lot 3. B. In the process of construction, Dibble shall respect this watercourse. Dibble shall correctly install a pipe to carry the flow from the drainage course under the driveway which Dibble shall build on the southerly 10 feet of Lot 4, and Dibble shall correctly connect this pipe which Greenebaum has constructed to carry water flow under the driveway which Greenebaum has constructed on the northerly 14 feet of the panhandle area of Lot 3. 3. Agreement Regarding Construction of Retaining Walls on Lot 3: A. Dibble is constructing two retaining walls running in a northerly to southerly direction at approximately the 253 foot level above mean sea Initials:3 level across Lot 4. These retaining walls will be approximately four and eight feet high, with the exact height of each wall to be determined by a soils engineer. B. At Dibble's expense, Dibble shall continue these retaining walls for 17 feet onto Lot 3 at approximately the 253 foot level. C. Dibble shall construct these retaining walls in a competent and workmanlike manner, using agreed -upon materials and techniques customarily used in the trade. D. Once construction of the retaining walls is completed, Greenebaum shall maintain the portion of these retaining walls which extends onto Lot 3. E. Greenebaum hereby grants to Dibble an easement on the northeasterly portion of Lot 3 where these retaining walls shall, be constructed, with this easement limited to entry to Lot 3 for purposes of constructing these retaining walls. 4. Escrow of this Easement and Development Agreement: A. Dibble and Greenebaum agree that the value of the construction of the retaining wall is $2,700. Dibble shall pay excise tax at the closing of the purchase of Lot 4 `on $2,700. An excise tax affidavit will be prepared and executed by both Dibble and Greenebaum. Dibble shall pay the excise tax. B. This Easement and Development Agreement shall be recorded only at the closing of the purchase of Lot .4, and the excise tax will be paid. Escrow fees will be paid by Dibble. C. If Dibble fails to receive needed variances or if for any reason his transaction to purchase Lot 4 fails, or if he purchases lot 4 but does not build a house on it for himself, then this Easement and Development Agreement shall be null and void. 5. Cooperation: The parties agree to take all reasonably necessary actions and to cooperate and sign any further documentation necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement. Initials: � 4 i 6. General Provisions: A. Binding Effect: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors, heirs, assigns; and personal representatives and all persons claiming by, through or under the parties hereto. B. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Jurisdiction over and venue of any suit arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in the state courts of Snohomish County, Washington. C. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that any suit or other proceeding is instituted by either party to this Agreement arising out of or pertaining to this Agreement or the relationship of the parties, including but not limited to filing suit or requesting an arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution process (collectively, "Proceedings"), and appeals and collateral actions relative to such a suit or Proceeding, the substantially prevailing party as determined by the. court or in the Proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses incurred relative to such suit or Proceeding from the substantially non -prevailing party, in addition to such other relief as may be awarded. D. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this matter. It may not be modified except in a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of the modification is sought. E. Waiver: The waiver by a party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement by the other party shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by that party. No waiver shall be valid unless in Initials: ��Z�_ 5 • - i writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the waiver is sought. F. Severability: If for any. reason any portion of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the holding of invalidity or unenforceability of that portion.shall not affect any other portion of this Agreement and the remaining portions.of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. G. Notices: Any notice required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given if in writing delivered to the party, or sent by.certified mail to the address listed below for that party: Greenebaum: 1114 Daley Place Edmonds WA 98020 Dibble's address before building his new home shall be: Keith Dibble 516 Homeland Drive Edmonds WA 98020 Dibble's address after building his new home -shall be 1116 Daley Place Edmonds WA 98020 These addresses may be changed upon five (5) days written notice to the other party. Such notice, demand, request, consent, approval, and other instrument shall be deemed to have been served on the third (3rd) day following the mailing date. Initials: t .�7T. 6 1 Greenebaum: ven E. Greenebaum Date: Dibbles: Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998: Keith A. Dibble Date: 1 Oa Peggy A. Dibble, as trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 19998: Peggy A. Dibble Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) - I certify that I know.or have satisfactory evidence that Steven E. Greenebaum appeared before me, and thatdi6/she/they acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument' and acknowledged it to beXi s/her/their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated Pr'�t Name: '� ' -7� . �. %✓� c y f Notary Public i and for the State of �• e Washington • �;SSio, F Residing at -_ ';, Z.` A/0 :Y°NOTAIiy"TA*- '= My commission expires F- Initials: RQ 104 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day of �� ='', 2000, before me, the undersigned not public in and for the state of Wagliington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Keith A. Dibble, to me known to be the trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998, and Peggy A. Dibble, to me known to be the trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated october 20, 1998, the trusts that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said trustees for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto on the above date. Dated _ c' �� , %,� �. Priest Name: ,,-i; eC:r Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at �► •� q.. {., My commission expires " ifkv. e10TA� k � Coksfkhents/dibble, leMs ent andLt At"iQ nt agreement.doc Initials: 8 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avmue Nortb Edmonds, WA 98020 O CONFORMED COPY 200106040085 06/04/2001� p� 0585 P.0005 RECORDED AM Snohomish County COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: �EiGN/T zGl�/— Q•�/�/�_ . Grantor(s): (I A15VAN [-/,&QLE- (2).?�," ,AWWCAddfdonal on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec,T99-4-1—Tm 7X� g ��' Qtr ' ^. OR Lot �a to s Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1. 7141.0 31Q4-60:j (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CM OF EDMONDS AXPROVEDD �FOR RECORDING BY,.. DATifi�C PAGE OF �r- Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the. City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise is follows: i r � . APPR0 D oR RBO BY: DATE: /nPE AGOF 1. Description of Subject Property This covenant of notification and indemnificntion/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of street address), Edmonds Soolxomish County, Wasbington and legally described as: �-o i i 6a/ / l/ /ls-_ n C i1�, fZ7 1 Y1 , / is, —%A P 11-L 2. Notification and Covenant of Notlfi anon The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within att area which has been idendfled by the.0ty of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. 110 risks associated with development Of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit rile number _ __ (insert number) on Me with the City of ]Edmonds Building Department. Conditions limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed I in accordance with the recommendations of ' r • N Ai'PRO FOR RfiCO Q; BY: -= DATE: O PAGE ,,,, OF the coQsultents Im the course of permit. Issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS, geotechnical engineer, geologist, arcbltect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as.lf herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, Iender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the Zile and the City urges. review of its contents. The Zile may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, lZl Sth Avenue North, Edmonds$ Washington 98020. 3. Judemlaification alld Hold Harjmlm The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with developmient, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development In addition, the -OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to Indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its of`ilcers, agents and employees from any Ions, claims, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, mdsing from or out of the Issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or w u APPROVE POI. RECORD // 1NG: BY:-�� DATE: fps PAGE_, OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. durance ReQu r mgnt In addition to any bonding which may be required during the coarse of development, the Community Services Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the'maintenance of an Insurance policy for public liabillty coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above; 5. Covenant tg Touch aM C`n =n the Lando This covenant of notification and indemniffeatiowfh.old harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, biudittg, obligating and/or Inuring to the beneilt of future owners, heirs, successors and Interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their Interest may appear. This provision ahaU not be Interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the Clty except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such personas to maintain the insurance above required, 11 AP p FOR RECO a; BX: ATE: / PAaL OF ]DONE tb.isi day of OWNER(S) By: By: l By STATE OF WASMNGTON ) COUNTY OF �► horns 1 I certify that Lknow or have satisfactory evidence that K �� 0) LL # . one s bh12 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the. purposes mentioned in this instrument. 1 day of6 DATED this — Z6o6 DEBRA L. KARBER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 8, 2003 LrME14 MUMDINCIMEADOWICOVFJ(ANT -- - kww q,. NOTARY PUBLIC IbA��. My Commission expires: `�i ' AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO Keith A. Dibble 516 Homeland Drive Edmonds WA 98020, RECEIVED AN 11 2001 BUILDING DEPT. . EASEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Grantor: Steven E. Greenbaum Grantee: Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Peggy A. Dibble, trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Legal Desc: Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive Assessors Parcel #: 7749-000-004-0007 . This Easement and Development Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this3L day of A44 s , 2000, by and between Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998, and Peggy A. Dibble, as trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998 (together referred to as "Dibble") and Steven E. Greenbaum, a single. man ("Greenbaum"). RECITALS A. WHEREAS, Dibble owns that certain real property legally described as Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, and referred to here as "Lot 4"; :B. WHEREAS, Greenebaum owns that certain real property legally described as Lot 3, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49. of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington; and referred to here as "Lot 3"; C. WHEREAS, Greenebaum already owns an easement over a triangular shaped area of Lot 4, which is located in the southeasterly corner of Lot 4, and which is legally described as follows: Initials: eA1 That portion of Lot 4, Harbor Hills, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 49 of Plats, pages 165 through 167, inclusive, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 4; thence N 0*10' 53" W, along the east line of said Lot 4, a distance of 20 feet; thence S 89° 49' 07" W, a distance of 38.66 feet to an intersection with the southerly line of said Lot 4; thence S 62° 49' 40" E, along said southerly line . a distance of 43.53 feet to the point of beginning, and referred to here as "the triangle easement of Lot 4"; D. WHEREAS, Lot 3 and Lot 4 are within the same tract of land; E. WHEREAS, Grenebaum has agreed to grant an easement for access to Dibble and the parties have agreed to into additional agreements; F. WHEREAS, this Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of the agreement of the parties to commence development of the Lots; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the. mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Easement. A. Greenebaum's Grant of Easement. Greenebaum hereby grants a non-exclusive easement to Dibble for driving automobiles over the "Easement Section of Lot 3". The Easement Section of Lot 3 is legally described as follows: A parallelogram 15 feet by 14 feet, which lies southerly of the two -car garage to be constructed on Lot 4 and further described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 3, where it meets the Daley Place cul de sac, and proceeding south 62° 49' 40" east 55 feet to the true point of beginning, and from the true point of beginning proceeding south 62° 49' 40" east for 15 feet, and then proceeding south 27° 10' 20" west for 14 feet, and then proceeding north 62° 49' 40" west for 15 feet, Initials: Q Q 2 and then proceeding north 27° 10' 20" east for 14 feet to the true point of beginning, thus enclosing a parallelogram, which is 15 feet on the northerly and southerly sides and 14 feet on the easterly and westerly sides. B. Agreements Regarding the Easement Granted by Greenebaum: 1. The panhandle of Lot 3 running westerly to Daley Place is 14 feet wide, whereas the paved portion of the driveway is 12 feet wide, with an unpaved, two -foot wide strip lying between the northerly boundary of the panhandle section of Lot 3 and the paved portion of the driveway. In the Easement Section of Lot 3, Dibble shall be responsible to maintain the two -food wide strip, and he shall replace the agreed -on material lost with new material of the same size and mix. 2. This grant of easement shall not extend to motorcycles. 3. This Easement Section of Lot 3 shall be used by Dibble solely for driving across as a "turn -around" to facilitate access to Dibble's garage, and not for parking automobiles or storing equipment or leaving anything in it or for any other purpose. .2. . Agreement Regarding Existing Water Course Running Across Lots 3 and 4: A. There is a drainage course which runs both across Lot 3 and down from above Lot 4 and onto Lot 4 at approximately 250 feet above mean sea level and then runs across the surface of Lot 4, roughly parallel to the southerly boundary of Lot 4, then under the driveway to be constructed on the southerly 10 feet of Lot 3, and then under the driveway and panhandle on the northerly 14 feet of Lot 3. B. In the process of construction, Dibble shall respect this watercourse. Dibble shall correctly install a pipe to carry the flow from the drainage course under the driveway which Dibble shall build on the southerly 10 feet of Lot 4, and Dibble shall correctly connect this pipe which Greenebaum has constructed to carry water flow under the driveway which Greenebaum has constructed on the northerly 14 feet of the panhandle area of Lot 3. 3. Agreement Regarding Construction of Retaining Walls on Lot 3: A. Dibble is constructing two retaining walls running in a northerly to southerly direction at approximately the 253 foot level above mean sea Initials:_ 3 level across Lot 4. These retaining walls will be approximately four and eight feet high, with the exact height of each wall to be determined by a soils engineer. B. At Dibble's expense, Dibble shall continue these retaining walls for 17 . feet onto Lot 3 at approximately the 253 foot level. C. Dibble shall construct these retaining walls in a competent and workmanlike manner, using agreed -upon materials and techniques customarily used in the trade. D. Once construction of the retaining walls is _completed, Greenebaum shall maintain the portion of these retaining walls which extends onto Lot 3. E. Greenbaum hereby grants to Dibble an easement on the northeasterly portion of Lot 3 where these retaining walls shall be constructed, with this easement limited to entry to Lot 3 for.purposes of constructing these retaining walls. 4. Escrow of this Easement and Development Agreement: A. Dibble and Greenebaum agree that the value of the construction of the retaining wall is $2,700. Dibble shall pay excise 'tax at the closing of the purchase of Lot 4 on $2,700. An excise tax affidavit will be prepared and executed by both Dibble and Greenebaum. Dibble shall pay the excise tax. B. This Easement and Development Agreement shall be recorded only at the closing of the purchase of Lot 4, and the excise tax will be paid. - Escrow fees will be paid by Dibble. C. If Dibble fails to receive needed variances or if for any reason his transaction to purchase Lot 4 fails, or if he purchases lot 4 but does not build a house on it for himself, then this Easement and Development Agreement shall be null and void. 6. Cooperation: The parties agree to take all reasonably necessary actions and to cooperate and sign any further documentation necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement. Initials: Q KA P 4 6. General Provisions: A. Binding Effect: This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors, heirs, assigns, and personal representatives and all persons claiming by, through or under the parties hereto. B. Applicable Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Jurisdiction over and venue of any suit arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in the state courts of Snohomish County, Washington: C. Attorneys' Fees: In the event that any suit or other proceeding is instituted by either party to this Agreement arising out of or pertaining to this Agreement or the relationship of the parties, including but not limited to filing suit or requesting an arbitration, mediation, or other alternative dispute resolution process (collectively, "Proceedings"), and appeals and collateral actions relative to such a suit or Proceeding, the substantially prevailing party as determined by the court or in the Proceeding shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses incurred relative to such suit or Proceeding from the substantially non -prevailing party, in addition to such other relief as may be awarded. D. Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this matter. It may not be modified except in a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of the modification is sought. E. Waiver: The waiver by a party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement by the other party shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by that party. No waiver shall be valid unless in Initials:1i�� __� 5 writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of the waiver is sought. F. Severability: If for any reason any portion of this Agreement shall be held to be invali& or unenforceable, the holding of invalidity or unenforceability of that portion shall not affect any other portion of this Agreement and the remaining portions.of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. G. Notices: Any notice required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given if in writing delivered to the party, or sent by certified mail to the address listed below for that party: Greenbaum: 1114 Daley Place Edmonds WA 98020 Dibble's address before building his new home shall be: Keith Dibble 516 Homeland Drive Edmonds WA 98020 Dibble's address after building his new home shall be 1116 Daley Place Edmonds WA 98020 These addresses may be changed upon five (5) days written notice to the other party. Such notice, demand, request, consent, approval, and other instrument shall be deemed to have been served on the .third (3rd) day following the mailing date. Initials: P(1_ l�i�fi f�� 6 Greenebaum: ven E. Greenebaum Date: Dibbles: Keith A. Dibble, trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998: Keith A. Dibble Date: I00 Peggy A. Dibble, as trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998: R Peg A. Dibble Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Steven E. Greenebaum appeared before me, and that&/she/they acknowledged that he/she/they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be4/her/their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated j� ,' ' �� z. P `c_.l1 Ze �CC c-� Pr' "t Name: � -_ Notary Public i and for the State of NN J. B Washington , ..,psio1Fto � Residing at :b°NOTAFI y�N'. {: My commission expires C. 1 Initials: QQ /Ai L ? STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this ,`/ day of 2000, before me, the undersigned notary public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Keith A. Dibble, to me known to be the trustee of the Keith A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998, and Peggy A. Dibble, to me known to be the trustee of the Peggy A. Dibble Living Trust Dated October 20, 1998, the trusts that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said trustees for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument. Witness my hand and official seal hereto on the above date. Dated _l-�CCc' �;>Cctci // Prifit Name: ��>'%► ��`rc c r Notary Public in and for the State of Washington \R► J. e y Residing at ,► .� My commission expires %J X NOTAR y�N Co/csf/clients/dibble, agreement.doc Initials: i KA 8 08/21/2002 15:16 3607387798 DIBBLE ENGINEERING A PAGE 01 Y k DIBBLE ENGINEERING, INC. P.S. 600 DUPONT STREET NB BXLL]NGH.A.M, WA 98225 August 21, 2002 Mr. Lyle Chrisman Development Services Fngineer Engineering Division City of Edmonds 121 Ss' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 11 Dear Mr. Chrisman: After reviewing the need far a drain at the bottom of the North rockery adjacent to the Dibble residence located at 1116 Daley Place in Edmond, I believe the contractor was correct in omitting the drainpipe from the structure. The area around and under the house was over -excavated by 7-10 feet below the previous ground level and replaced with 4-6 inch quarry apalis. The quarry spalls not as a huge French drain to remove any seeping ground water from the bank. Since the rockery was build on a foundation of rock spalls, a pipe drain in my judgment is not required because any ground water would flow through the &palls into a pipe that circles the cul-de-sac and drains into the creek. Sincerely, J F Gre o rY nble P.E. Gregon da� .t 4 0 � fly/y %1 r.. % `10 '� 'Dr �� Re.�. � denc•e.. RECEIVED N c,r bo r AUG 21 2002 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS ate' GrO14V"NCI +f-r •-r/o w\ . /.�hc�er' the house— -thr C,p"c-terry s(x-t t I(s It he\\ :e4 I- d-e sRo c( rat I r fi hcct .IG/DWS fo the SfrcGr✓► oral k CC i r4-es / 21 COK1 --�otlUS ,e'' I 10� ail mow J p e -i-hCr + .2 M P"f1•e5 In t-O S ••Fr-ec, vyi. C.0 I -de -Sac, be.t016 rt:>.c-�,' Cirp l n� 'dm%•Y\ -thgfi -f lows rc + e o I 1 o h 'Po n d . 2,0 �oz ;St-,C PLAN) tAr 4 K A P-t3o I Lt- S Illli OA L-01 L 2A L47- IlC'v40e-)Q'LE DIBBLE ENGINEERING 600-8 DUPONT ST. BELLINGHAM, WA 9SM5AOM 0' 712" FA"X ('360) " �738 7798 PROPOSED RZ:5VENr-F- Fop- KEITH 4 FF-66Y DIBBLE! LOT # 4, HARBOR HLL _S a EPHON05, rtk 7 t� 5 � -z60 0 04/22/2002 88:56 425828-4 HAVE A GREAT PAJ PACE 81 Geo8ciesues Inc. Post Office ice Box 2385 Kirkland, OVA 98083 ` TeL• 425.82Z 1084 Fax. 425.828.9443 Keith Dibble. Job Number 8046 1116 Daley Place April 22, 2002 Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Final Letter Lot 4, Harbor Hills 1116 Daley Place Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Dibble: Bank stability was a high concern on this project. By ba clsfiMing the area between ' the house and the bank, this construction has created an integrated unit (the house and the backfill) to support the bottom half of the bank. This lateral support comes from the weight of the backfill and the house resisting lateral forces from the baulk. The backfilled area between the, house and bank .is 4--6 inch quarry spalls. In addition,. the house excavation included another to 10 foot over -excavation below the previous ground level and replacement with 4-6 inch quarry spalls. The weight of the backfill behind the house is a significant force resisting any lateral movement from the bank.. Moreover, the quarry &palls under the house provide a huge French drain to remove any seeping groundwater from the bank. In my professional judgment the proposed buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public, or any private party. Thank you, DODDS Qeoscicnces Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. APPROVED BY PLANNING ATTACHMENT 3 F 04/Q5/2002 13:35 42582894 0 HAVE A MEAT DAY 0 PAGE 01 ceo8cieneea Inc. Post Office Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel' 425.827.1084 ftx: 425.828. 9443 Keith Dibble 1116 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Final Inspection - Rockery Lot 4, Harbor Hills 1116 Daley Place Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Dibble: RECEIVED APR - 5 2002 PERMIT COUNTER Job Number 8046 April 5, 2002 The undersigned professional engineer visited your property last week. The purpose of our visit was to develop an opinion regarding the adequacy of rockery construction which was completed earlier on your site. The scope -of our work consisted of reviewing surficial conditions around the rockeries. Based on our review, the rockery rocks appear to be of fair to good quality and the rockery workmanship adequate. We observed evidence of drainage placed behind the rockeries. We saw no evidence and we consider it unreasonable considering the site conditions to conclude that the rockeries are anything other than stable and adequate. The one larger rockery (near the. northwest corner of the house) is constructed of larger rock and has a geometry which enhances stability further. Please contact the me if there are any questions. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. 04/ 95/ 2`00"', 13: 35 4258289443 04-;W2002 10:21 FAX HAVE A GREAT DAY PACE 02 Marl; Dodds DODDS G F: 0SL IF NC-FS N(- F ti Brix 21+3 Kirkland WA 98083 Dear Mark: RECEIVED Keith Dibble APR - 5 2002 1116 Daley Pace ids µ'A 98020 PERMIT COUNTER April 3, 2002 RE, 2001-042 3 O :%ls Mcg Gruwell. one or the Edinonda City planers who is going to review my north rockery, has qucstioned the need to backfill the area between the bank and m). novae and thus the need for the N11y analysts i'> as ?ollott's: The ob3reti%v is to vabilize the tank as much ra,Q possible. By back -filling the area Txtwcen the htiusc and the hank. we have created an in:cgrated unit (the house and the ba�,kfill) to support the bottom halt of the bark. This lateral support Lomas from the weight of We backfill and housc resisting an,y iurce iron the hunk. Since vm baokftlled the area betwe" the house and the bank %. tth a-b inch quarry spall plus exciLva ittg another 7 to 10 fcct below the existing ground levrel and ako replacing that material hztt: 4-6 inch quarry spali. the weight of the baekfitl i; significant while Lhe quamy shall p-oxides a huzc French drain to remove any water pressure and moiswrc tin: from thi: %rjnlc-. We di;i this according to the app-c>vCJ bu Jtng -permit. which clearly show the contours; of the bacluilied area abv. a the 250-foo: level btt-cen the bank arsd house. It you sgee w:th my analysis. would vuu rnitia' this 1eucr and ircludc a with the other fax to Ann 13ullis or, file constr-ction of my north rk s ry, Thank ycc, Sincerely, Keith Dibble Phone 425 775 4913 Fax 424 775 2584 04/Q5/2002- 113:35 4258289443 HAVE A GREAT. -DAY • PAGE 01 DODDS ftogo noes Inc. Post CY)1W Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel., 425.827.1084 Fax.' 425.828. 9443 Keith Dibble 1116 Daley Place Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Final Inspection - Rockery Lot 4, Harbor Hills 1116 Daley place Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Dibble: RECEIVED APR - 5 2002 PERMIT COUNTER Job Number 8046 April 5, 2002 The undersigned professional engineer visited your property last week. The purpose of our ,visit was to develop an opinion regarding the adequacy of rockery construction which was completed earlier on your site. The scope of our work consisted of reviewing surficial conditions around the rockeries, Based on our review, the rockery rocks appear to be of fair to good quality and the rockery workmanship adequate. We observed evidence of drainage placed behind the rockeries. We saw no evidence and we consider it unreasonable considering the site conditions to conclude that the rockeries are anything other than stable and adequate. The one larger rockery (near the northwest corner of the house) is constructed of larger rock and ,has a geometry which enhances stability further. Please contact the me if there are any questions. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. 01/24/2002 11:44 4258289443 s HAVE A URLAI DAY • rout Ul DODDS GeoSciences Inc. Post Office Box 2.385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel: 425.827.1084 Fax: 425.828, 9443 Keith Dibble 516 Home Land Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Final Letter Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Dibble: Job Number 8046 January 24, 2002 This. is our final letter concerning our professional observation services conducted during the construction of your residence on Lot 4 of the Harbor Hills neighborhood in Edmonds, Washington. The undersigned registered professional engineer made periodic visits to the property during excavation, foundation and site preparation. During that time we observed conditions and provided professional geotechnical engineering recommendations as necessary. Based on our site observations and testing during construction, it is our professional opinion that the geotechnical aspects of the completed development substantially comply with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements. If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned at (425) 827-1084. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences Inc. '4�p �ooti Mark K. Dodds, P.E. GO. G� 'W_1 10T1 %20 1 12:21 4258289443 HAVE A GREAT DAY PAGE 01 DODDS Geo�eienees Inc. Post Office Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel. 425.827.1084 Fox. 425.828.9443 Keith Dibble 516 Home Land Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Work Extension - Rockery Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Reference: 1) Set of Plans and Cross -Sections By Dibble Engineering, dated 9/28/01 Dear Mr. Dibble: Job Number 8046 October 16, 2001 RECEIVED CST 16 2001 PERMIT COUNTER The undersigned professional engineer visited your site last week. The purpose of our visit was to develop an opinion regarding whether rockery construction behind your new home could be done during the wet winter months. The scope of our work consisted of reviewing surf vial site conditions around the home. Review of the plans reveal the new rockery will be a maximum of 8 feet tall, with the average height being less than five feet. Based on our previous explorations the hillside behind the new rockery consists of dense glacial till. It is our opinion that the rockery can be built during the wet winter months. We recommend the rockery be completed in a timely manner and that, as much as possible, the existing tree root balls on the slope not be disturbed. If the tree root balls must be disturbed, remove only as much of the roots necessary to complete the rockery. Please contact the me if there are any questions. Thank you, Pacific Tree Care Div: Family Corporation PO Box 1354 Mercer Island, Wa 98040 425-454-9960 APPROVED BY PLANNI fax 425-687-8618 email: pactreel@home.com of b� M� ri, AFT LAND eg- kZAXV ego✓iswcts o µ Evaluation of trees at 1116 Daley PL for Keith Dibble - (June 6, 2001) Procedure The trees were evaluated for potential to fail and strike the new construction site. The evaluation includes six Big -leaf Maple Trees on the slope east of the new structure. All of the trees were cut down approximately ten years ago, the current leads are new growth since that time. . 1 5 O slope 6 O 4 3 20 O O O -----------------------------, New construction 1116 Daley PI. ------------------------------- Tree numbers stated herein this report refer to the above diagram. Observations Tree 1: A maple with two major leads 6" and 3". Excavation within 5' of the trunk no major roots appear to be damaged. Small pocket.of decay in the trunk in area of previous cut. Tree 2: Maple with four major leads 2-7, 5" and 4". Excavation within 3' of trunk, three roots N3" in diameter have been severed. Decay present in trunk, included bark at junction of leads. Tree 3: Maple with —10 leads 3"-5" diameters. Excavation within 6' of trunk, no major roots appear to be severed. Tree 4: A large maple stump with seven major leads 2-12", 2-10" and 3-7. Large areas of decay are visible in the trunk, included bark in areas were leads have grown to close together. Lots of dead stubs and open wounds in lower part of leads. Root area appears sound. Tree 5: Maple two or three leads N4", this tree is standing dead. Tree 6: Maple with two major leads 6" each, also two dead leads N4". Stubs, decay and defects are present in the lower part of leads. Recommendations After inspection and consideration the following mitigation has been determined to be best suited for this site. Tree 1: The largest lead should be removed. Tree 2: The four large leads of this tree should be removed. Tree 3: Nothing needs to be done at this time, the size of the leads warrants no further action. Tree 4: Due to the amount of decay in the trunk and the potential for failure this tree should be completely removed. Tree 5: This dead tree should be removed Tree 6: The two largest leads, and the two dead leads, should be removed. Tom Bay, ISA Certified Arborist # RM-0134 2 e5/15/2001 1b:1J Q"d 1ub-Jby2 jDMAWN U nMiLIN 41, STFIFET FILE May 15, 2001 City of Edmonds City Building Division. 121 5d' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn.: Jeannine Graf C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. 16716 SE 28`' St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Pb. (425) 746 3992 Subject: Keith Dibble Residential site Lot #4, Harbor Hills RECEIVED MAY 15 2001 BUILDING DEPT. Reference: Letter from Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated May 11, 2001 Dear Ms. Graf I believe the revised plans for Keith Dibble (dated May 14, 2001) for drainage reflect the request from Aaron McMichael in the above referenced letter. The intent of the interceptor trench is to route the surface flow to the storm system in the driveway and on to the existing storm system. In the submittal dated May 14, were three cross section of the proposed interceptor trench located at the toe of slope and the plan shows the tight line of this system to the CB#3. We hope this will answer any question you might have about this site. Please call me if you have any additional concerns. . Sincerely, C O aA, ' C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. 16716 SE 28`h St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Ph. (425) 746 3992 Project: Dibble Residential Site Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, WA Owner: Keith Dibble 516 Homeland Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Ph. (425) 640 5434 Date: May 14, 2001 STREET RM PERMIT COUNTER ent By:.LSA; 425 672 7998; Apr-27-01 12:02PM; Page 1/2 94—/Z 7/d 1 0 Date: � ,�o LEM File No. COMMU s Time: To: �� ►, t Q Fax No.(A-Z'�_;) `? 1"Z-�,44 Co./Dept. From: Cover sheet pl o _ L � Fi t4b Sir R-exsr- c-,-1 i- ; Fc_� �-i•'t-�.'� .4y�1 `i' �xv iS tl �� , �--�27/ d T-- Copy to: EILIE: Lovell-Saueriand & Associates, Inc. 04M tlyd Ax W., .Suite :m, iynnwoW, wn 923036 npn.77 -7661 i25.M..1591 42S•672.799E la 4Z65, 1 Z_o rr cl GN 4.12 e, / ,+), el -I I -`\ ` � \� ,`\ � \ .� �'�\ - �� ;= o ►-e4 thc, �' rv�/l 6e.i�ct��`�r ((c=sf I� !f� �� Tai cUt Q rY--4� C�J 1 t �. G C L a � r --rrGa j .2- '�'r c� IW he�-7 fie!ou, lI htS�c.cj c{r � Z v3 fria,.� Z- 4"d a •.\ When Fz,IG� Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM May 21, 2001 File Plan Check PC-01-014 and Street File 1116 Daley Place Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner Stream Crossing Mr. Keith Dibble has applied for a building permit (Plan Check number PC-01-014) to construct a single-family residence at 1116 Daley Place which is lot 4 of the Harbor Hills subdivision. This lot previously had two critical area variance requests to allow development closer than normally allowed to a steep slope under files V-98-154 and V-2000-71. The plot plan for the 1998 variance clearly showed a stream on the site, but staff apparently never spoke with the applicants about also requesting a critical areas variance for construction to be closer than normally allowed to the stream. Mr. Dibble has pointed out that the neighboring property (lot 3) was allowed to place the stream in a culvertwhere their driveway crossed (see attached driveway plan for lot 3), and he wished to do the same thing. After reading the plat conditions, staff felt it unlikely that Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife would approve additional covering of the creek. However, the City has received a letter from Tony Opperman, Area Habitat Biologist for the Department of Fish and Wildlife (see attached letter dated March 20,2001), in which he states that as long as the project follows the City of Edmonds requirements for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control (TESC), there is no need for a Hydraulic Project Approval. He states that their main concern at this location is for water quality and the installation of a culvert should be done in the drier summer months. Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.15B.120.B gives the requirements for stream crossings. Staff is considering the stream to be a category 2 stream without salmonids, though it is possible that it is actually a category 3 stream. Mr. Dibble has submitted a letter addressing the criteria (see attached letter dated April 5, 2001). Because the source of the stream is being covered and the culvert will connect with an existing'culvert across lot 3, staff is less concerned with having native vegetation providing habitat on lot 4. Therefore, the TESC plan and standard landscaping associated with single-family dwellings will be considered adequate stabilization. It is also noted that a small portion of the stream may be beyond the edge of the driveway, but since the concern in this area is for water quality, covering the remaining stretch of creek is being allowed. Don Fiene, former Hydraulics Engineer for the city, confirmed that grass -lined swales City of Edmonds c�a Community Services CITY C0w-y • are good for filtering oil out of water, but in this location, that is not so much of a concern. Covering the remaining portion of the creek might actually benefit the water quality by keeping out fertilizers and pet feces. With the commitments in Mr. Dibble's letter, and with the requirements for drainage and TESC normally required by the City with buildings permits, the criteria in ECDC 20.15B.120.B are met.. Therefore, staff is authorizing the stream crossing to allow the Dibble driveway as shown on the building permit plans. _MP,-11-2001 FRI 04:36 PM 4 u A . May 11, 2001 Project No. KE01073A FAX N0, 425 827 5424 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 0 U ® ® . City of Edmonds City }Building Division 121 5" Avenue North Edfrionds, Washington 98020 Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf Subject: Gcocechnical Ilan Review Dibble Residence Edmonds, Washington hcfcrciice: "Site and Drainage Plan" Sheet 1 of 1, dated April 5, 2001, for Keith Dibble, by C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. Thar Ms. Graf: gtFtEEt �'� BUILDING MAY 1 11 2001 As requested, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) has completed a review of the above- re[•erenrcd plan. The referenced plan contains a modification to the length and location of the proposed cast rockery, Specifically, the rockery has been moved to the west approximately 3 to 5 feet and has been shortened at its north end by approximately 25 feet. After completing our initial review, we requested additional information from Mr, Dibble including cross sections cut through the southeast wall of the home and slope above this wall. We understand Mr, nibble had this area more thoroughly surveyed prior to completing the cross sections. The cross sections show that the interceptor drain has been extended behind the garage, and is localcd within the proposed quarry spall excavation backfill, The proposed rockery has also been eliminated. After reviewing the cross sections faxed to our office on April 27, 2001, we recornrnended that Mr. Dibble have his geotechnical consultant review the cross sections and provide appropriate design recommendations regarding earthwork and drainage in this area of the site. We received a letter entitled "Addendum No. 1 - Plan Review No. 2, Lot 4 Harbor Hills, Edmonds, Washington" from DODDS GeoSciences, Inc. (DODDS) dated May 3, 2001 providing such recommendations. Review Conclusions Based oa our review of the referenced cross sections and letter from DODDS, we understand th,nt llie rockery will no longer be constructed on this slope We concur with DODDS that as much of �k► exis�}�� radon ass t�4�os'ew sd le'�1�. s 3�, c house or orate ck Iift i venue, ui r all , 9 3 o i P ��154Z�►• West Sound Office • 179 Madrone Lane North • Bambridoe Island.WA 98110 • Phone 206 780-9370 • Fax 20C 760 9438 114 MAY-11-2001 FRI 04:36 PM 4 FAX NO. 425 827 5424 P. 01 exravadon. In our opinion, other geotechnical aspects of the project have been sufficiently addressed with the exception of the following issues: We recommend removing the interceptor trench where it intersects the inundation excavation at the southeast corner of the garage. Due to the high permeability of the quarry spill backfill, the seepage collected on the slope would drain into the excavation if constructed as shown on Cross Sections A -A and B-B. The collected seepage should he tiglitlined to the storm sewer. If the interceptor drain is left intact through the excavared area, it will concentrate collected water within the foundation backfill. The excavation drain and footing drain systems are likely not designed to discharge this volume of water. We recommend that at least 12 inches of washed, rounded gravel or pea gravel be constructed around the foundation footing drainpipe. The footing drainpipe should be completely enveloped in the drain rock. Closilre Provided that the final design incorporates the above recorrunendations, the City of Edmonds' Mcadowdale Gcotechnical Report Guidelines will remain satisfied. Review of additional plan revisions should not be required. We trust this information meets your current needs. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to c�lll. Sincerely, ASSO ;IATE'D EART)(1 ,SCIENCES, INC. Kirldati 1, Washington M'r`.PIRES 2/21 ? Jo G. Aaron McMichael, P.E. Senior (J'ootechnical Frigineer GAMAJ KIM075A3 D:MMM A W - N12K 2 • DODDS GeoSciences Inc. Post Office Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel: 425. 827.1084 Fax: 425.828.9443 Keith Dibble 516 Home Land Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 STREET FILE Subject: Addendum No. 1 - Plan Review #2 Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Reference: 1) Contours and Cross -Sections By Lovell - Sauerland Associates Dear Mr. Dibble: Job Number 8046 Mary 3, 2001 We have reviewed the above referenced item. The following are our comments: 1) From a geotechnical engineering perspective, the foundation and cuts are acceptable with the understanding that the actual cut slope angle will depend on the competency of the underlying soil which is encountered. 2) The drainage engineer has indicated to me that the bottom of the over -excavation will be sloped to drain to a collection point where any collected water would be channeled to an appropriate discharge point. 3) We have excavated extra test pits on the slope. These test pits have verified that very dense glacial till exists at shallow depth. No rockeries are required on this slope. If at all possible, we recommend leaving in the shrubs and vegetation as much as possible. Please contact me directly if there are any questions. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences. Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. ti • • Associated Earth Sciences, Inc 025 a April 6, 2001 Project No. KE01073A City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Engineering Division 121 5" Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf Subject: Final Geotechnical Report Review Dibble Residence Edmonds, Washington Reference: Geotechnical Response and Plan Review Letter. Dodds Geosciences, Inc. Job No. 8046, March 15, 2001 Site and Drainage, TESCP Plans Sheets 1 and 2 of 2, dated March 19, 2001 C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. Consulting Engineer Dear Ms. Graf: STREET F,�E 1!t_ PR 9 alto/iy ��J��i G7Y OP z FPgRJ s As requested, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) has completed a review of. the above - referenced letter, which contains responses to AESI's request for addendum geotechnical information contained in out geotechnical report review .letter dated February 8, 2001. We have also .reviewed the above -referenced. plans to verify that they contain the site development notations as required by the Meadowdale Geotechnical Report Guidelines (MGRG). REVIEW CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, the addendum. information contained in the subject geotechnical response letter has adequately addressed the majority of the outstanding review issues, which were primarily concerned with site slope stability and temporary cut slope criteria.. Additionally, a minimal risk statement has also been provided in the Dodds Geosciences, Inc. letter. However,. with respect to the foundation overexcavation recommendations contained on page 2 of the Dodds Geosciences Inc. letter, we recommend that the overexcavation of the fill soils extend a lateral Corporate Office • 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • Kirkland, WA 98033, • Phone 425 827-7701 • Fax 425 827-5424 West Sound Office • 179 Madrone Lane North • Bainbridge Island,WA 98110 • Phone 206 780-9370 • Fax•206 780-9438 r dho • • distance equal to one-half the excavation depth beyond the footing edges , as recommended in the 1999 Dodds Geosciences, -Inc. geotechnical report, rather than "approximately 3 feet beyond the footing edges", as stated in the Dodds Geosciences, Inc. letter. The excavation may then extend up a 1H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical) slope from the till soils. Review of the above -referenced plans_ found that notations concerning site drainage and a Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (TESCP). have now been included as required by the MGRG. - CLOSURE ,' Based on the information presented above, it is our opinion that the City of Edmonds' MGRG requirements have now beet satisfied. No further addendum geote nnical inforination is required at this time. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Engineering Division and their. agents, for specific application to this project. Within, the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our review was completed. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. If you should have any questions or if , we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. ` Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington G. Aaron McMichael, P.E. Senior Project Engineer GAM/ap KE01073A2 D:\WP\ap\4-01,- W2K 2 \ • Ms. Meg Gruwell Community. Service.Department Planning Division 121 5th Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Gruwell: APR Z LAA"'V'11U SEAT. April 5, 2001 Plan Check # 01-014 In response to your City of Edmonds Plan Review corrections memorandum dated March 6, 2001, I will make certain that best management practices will be maintain and used during construction to insure that water quality is maintained at all times. The construction period shall be done during summer low periods. The driveway �is designed and located to conform to topography, and will be maintained to prevent erosion and restriction of the natural movement of groundwater as it affects the stream. The'driveway is designed to minimize the area of disturbance to the stream and appears to be constructed to minimize adverse -impact on the hydrologic quality of the stream or associated habitat. With respect to the retaining walls, no walls will be built within five feet of the tow of the slope unless another variance is obtained, or, as in the recently happened, the regulations are change. I trust this letter will be sufficient to clear up questions concerning the impact of the project on the ground water run-off and the retaining wall issue as it relates to the five- foot setback. Sincerely, Keith Dibble Owner of Lot 4, Harbor Hills. STATE < = s s 02 �yl leep a0Y • IWO" FLEr" State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard - Mill Creek, Washington 98012 - (425) 775-1311 March 20, 2001 114P City of Edmonds, Community Service Dept. Planning Division - ATTN: Ms. Meg Gruwell �pl 121 - 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Ms. Gruwell: SUBJECT: Site development by Mr. Keith Dibble The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) was contacted by Mr. Keith Dibble in early March of last year regarding his proposed purchase and development of a land parcel on Daley Place. Mr. Dibble asked about the possible need for a Hydraulic Project Approval from WDFW to install a culvert to access the site. I offer the following comments at this time. Other comments may be offered as the project progresses. On Monday, March 20, 2000, I made a visit to the site proposed for development by Mr. Dibble. We discussed his proposal for installing a culvert for a driveway across the small spring flowing along the south side of the property. I suspect this water eventually contributes to the flow of Shell Creek. As long as City of Edmonds BMPs for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control are followed, there is no need for a Hydraulic Project Approval from WDFW. The spring on the site is one of many headwater sources for the streams that are found in the Edmonds area. At this location our main concern is for water quality. Installation of a culvert, if done in the drier summer months and following BMPs, should have no significant impacts to downstream fish habitat. WDFW will not be requiring an HPA for this work. If you have questions regarding these comments, feel free to contact me at (425) 379-2309. Sincerely, Tony Oppermann Area Habitat Biologist TO:to A DODDS GeoSciences Inc. Post Office Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel: 425.82 7.1084 Fax: 425.828.9443 Keith Dibble 516 Home Land Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 T-0 AIC Subject: Geotechnical Response & Plan Review Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington Job Number 8046 March 15, 2001 Reference: 1) Geotechnical Report Review By Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., dated 2/8/01 2) Set of Plans (Sheets 1 through 8) By Ron McNurlen, Architect, last revised 2/23/01 3) Site and Drainage Plan By C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. Dear Mr. Dibble: We have reviewed the above referenced items. The following are our comments: 1) In order to more fully characterize the subsurface soils conditions, especially with respect to caving, an extra test pit (Test Pit #4) has been excavated on the site. The revised Site Plan and new Test Pit Log are attached. This test was excavated and logged and then left open for about 1.5 hours. Most of the caving occurred during excavation and within about 10 minutes of excavation. We observed no caving during the last half hour the pit was left open. 2) The hillside slope was also probed and several shallow holes were excavated. The steep portions of the hillside are almost immediately underlain with very dense glacial till. 3) The interceptor trench will be placed as close to the slope as practical. This interceptor trench will provide the site dewatering desired by the reviewer. We will monitor this trench and determine when site excavation can begin. 4) We have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the Critical Areas Checklist and the Environmental Checklist. Both checklists are in conformance with our report and our observations. `11`�`&`T FILE, !, N Hal &. 03/15/2001 15:00 42bU2 1344J is MAVt A k3mm l LAY 0 GEOTECHNICAL RESPONSE March 15, 2001 Job Number.8046 Page 2 We have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the above referenced plans and found they are in conformance with our geotechnical engineering report. Our analyses indicate there is less than a thirty percent (<30%) probability of a landslide on this property over the next 25 years. The proposed on -site improvements increase the stability of the site by providing slope reinforcement via walls and controlled drainage. We hereby confirm that the cut and fill quantities for this project should be calculated assuming that the foundation over -excavation will extend approximately three feet beyond the footing edges and then extend up at about a 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) slope. A fluff factor of about 15% should be used in calculating quantities of export. Minor additional slumping of side slopes should be anticipated, however no significant damage to this property or adjacent properties is anticipated. In our judgment the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report and the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the report. The proposed development does not increase the potential for slope movement. A representative from our firm should be on site during excavation and grading to monitor and assess conditions. Please contact me directly if there are any questions. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences Inc. IL Dq ,at 3 1 Mark K. Dodds, -P.E. 03/15/2001 .15: bb 4'L5tl'Ltly44d 1'IHVC H �arccHi uric DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. Job Number 8046 - Plate 3 Site Plan Gnanaragah Reeidence Lot 4, Harbor Bills Edmonds, Washington GJ/ 17/ LGG1 1:J. uu 1L..lucwI- V1 � U) o i ran m-A 0 Fill 4 2 i 4� 4 4f� 6 SAS S sus 8 TE IT TP--4 DATE EXCAVATED: 2/14/01 EXCAVATION METHOD:Backhoe DESCRIPTION LOGGED BY; Mark K. Dodds, P.E. SURFACE ELEVATION: A 240 MSL Dark brown to gray Gravelly Silty Sand with abundant concrete, wood, and debris. (Fill) SM Bray -brown Gravelly Slity Sand, wet, medium -dense. Stopped at 10.5 feet. Standing groundwater table at 8.0 feet after 1.5 hours. Caving of test plt Malls to about 1:1 (H:V) in that time. 12 DODDS Geosciences Inc. P.O. Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 08083 (425) 827-1084 LOG OF TEST PIT TP-4 Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington TEST PIT REPORT Associated Earth Sciences, In ® TREE ® T FILE� S , February 8, 2001 Project No. KE01073A City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Engineering Division U I L ®� N G 121 5 h Avenue North - Edmonds, Washington 98020 FEB 2001 Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf Subject: Geotechnical Report Review Dibble Residence Lot 4, Harbor Hills, 1116 Daley Place Edmonds, Washington Reference: Geotechnical Engineering Report Dodds Geosriences, Inc. Job No. 8046, June 4, 1998 Dear Ms. Graf: As requested, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AF,SI) has completed a review of the above - referenced geotechnical report, which is being used to support development .of the proposed Dibble residence. It is our understanding that although -the -subject property is located outside. of the Meadowdale Landslide Hazard Area, the City requires geotechnical review of all lots within Harbor Hills .with respect to. the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Checklist for Permit Submittal criteria as contained in the City of Edmonds Ordinance #2661 and, the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.•05. . Our. work .also included review of the architectural plans for the subject house. , The architectural drawings were prepared by Ron McNurlen Architect, referenced . as "Dibble Residence, Lot 4; Harbor Hills, Edmonds Washington, Sheets l through 8-;" dated September_ 6, 2000. Also reviewed were a site and drainage plan by C._ Shawn O'Brien, P.E. Consulting Engineer titled, "Site and Drainage Plan, sheet 1 of 1," dated December 21, 2000, as well as, preliminary slope and foundation cross -sections by the Architect, undated. Site Conditions and Project Description Review of the referenced geotechnical, report and architectural cross sections indicates that the proposed site slopes gently upward from the street to the east, steepens to moderate slopes (22 to 36 percent) within the interior of the lot, and flattens near the eastern property line. Three exploration pits were completed for the above -referenced report. Dense, lodgement till soils at Corporate Office • 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100.• Kirkland, WA 98033 -Phone 425 827-7701 • Fax 425 827-5424 West Sound Office • 179 Madrone Lane North • Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 - Phone 206 780-9370 • Fax 206 780-94�8 • shallow depths were: reported within the upper portion of the lot. Saturated, loose, colluvium and fill soils, extending to depths of 7.5 to 11 feet below the existing ground surface, were reported within the central and lower portion of the lot. The colluvium and fill soils were underlain by dense, lodgement till and contain abundant ground water. Review of the U.S., Geological Survey (USGS) geologic map of the area titled, Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, by Mackey Smith 1975, indicates that the site is underlain by lodgement till soils. The proposed residence will consist of a multiple -story, wood -frame structure .with a daylight foundation Foundation support.'is proposed by- overexcavation of,the colluvium and fill soils to expose medium dense to dense, lodgement till soils at -depths of 7 to 9.feet below existing grades. The excavation will then be backfilled with a .quarry spall structural fill. Permanent_ site drainage provisions will include construction of a 24-inch-deep gravel interceptor trench running across the northeast portion' of the, slope above the residence,..a drain within the overexcavated foundation area, and footing drains and tightlined roof gutters. Review Conclusions Based on the information described above, it is our opinion that the subject geotechnical report • has adequately. defined the site subsurface conditions and proposed a suitable foundation support method. However, additional information is needed to satisfy.the requirementsIofthe Meadowdale Geotechnical Report Guidelines (MGRG); As identified in the existing geotechnical report, completing the proposed excavation will likely result in heavy caving of the excavation sidewalls. It is AESI's opinion that without .specific excavation recommendations from the geotechnical engineer; excavation caving may induce slumping within the colluvium and weathered till .soils immediately upslope of the excavation. Therefore, in addressing the General Provisions of the MGRG, geotechmcal information regarding site slope stability and risk of instability for the site.. and surrounding properties during and after construction should be addressed under Item Nos. 3,. 6, 7, and 8. Further, within the Specific Provisions requirements of these guidelines, Item Nos: 1, 3, 6; 7, and 8 should be addressed. When addressing the items above, we suggest that the geotechnical engineer of record provide . recommendations concerning temporary dewatering of the excavation cut slopes to increase the stability of the planned foundation excavation. It is our opinion that.the most practical means of controlling site ground water would be to extend . the planned gravel interceptor trench across the slope, and deepen it to contact the underlying, dense till. soils. Further, we suggest. that the interceptor trench should be put in place at'least. 2 weeks prior to. the foundation_ excavation to allow the foundation soils time to drain. In addition to the MGRG mentioned above, our review found that Ordinance No. 2661 and the ECDC Chapter 19.05 require the following: • The geotechnical engineer, shall complete the Critical Areas Checklist and' the Environmental Checklist. 2 • Design recommendations from geotechuical report ''shall also be included in the Drainage and Grading Plans.. Review of the referenced geotechnical report and Site and Drainage plan do not provide specific erosion control criteria as required. • The geotechnical engineer who prepared the report shall also submit a signed an4 stamped statement to the � Building Official that includes the Ordinance minimal risk language. Closure Based on the information presented above, AESI recommends that.the geotechnical engineer of record provide an addendum report addressing the iequired MGRG as discussed above..Once the addendum recommendations are available,. they should be incorporated into the architectural,. grading. and drainage plans. AESI -will be available to .assist the City in review of the addendum report and plans for'compliance with'these guidelines. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Engineering Division and their agents,. for specific application to this 1 project.. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and* budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect, in this area- at the time our review was completed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. - Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC: Kirkland; Washington WAS4 �y 218A100 �O + 33222 40 lsTER SIONALti� IXF'IRES.2/271Z�b1 .G. Aaron McMichael, P.E. Senior Geotechnical. Engineer GAM/Id - KE01073A1 - D:\WP\Id\2-01 - W2K 3 4, .260 2.0 250 . '` ,.: �:- 8 i`-ell• .' EXISTING GRAVES-' S`. .. o Of ybo ♦�r'l`.1$'-0' AC,GE55 EASEMENT /R�CEIVED I-I.b yAO n aLOT AREA: � :.AAN 1 1 2001 \ 1. -- r_-- 11,904 SOFT35.F3L . o LL; BUILDING DEPT. LOT COVERAGE i 23,18 50.FT (19.9%) 'HI-MA*<3 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GH -0' ROGK[RY F' ; � ,� •, ; ��', ii _ i 3420 50.FT (28.1%) / ' - y.:> :• 7 �PPROVBnyy Ap�fl �fV� LITYEASEMENT ' �L=3't�>0�----',�I•� / Y / LANI�I��NP•OFEF,TY LINE • R umst al h` P'.IG Root eNurien ZI G J DRAIN 'TINS �LecT sns11 i STATE OF ASHINBTON EYU7 '_•t_YIf-R Styli ViATCR METER\ 1 pATc� �i�r. Gam. M.N PLOT PLAN , is = 20,=0 LE(5AL DESCRIPTION LOT #4, PLAT OF HARBOR HILLS, CITY OF EDMOND5, 5NOHOMI5H COUNTY, WASHINGTON -roc ,occca1T `17 49-0001 HEIGHT .CALCULATIONS (A) 264.0 +(B) 241.0 +(G) 235.0 +(D) 231.0 = 986 DIVIDED BY 4 = 246.5(AVERA6E GRADE) + 25-0" = :2'11.5'(MAX HEIGHT ALLOYED) - 1�h lsils__L .:�s 1//A� '' I�Q•^� U�Jr� • /' / R 4 V(• • •' G ♦ 1P1 .. -- t-'mor TY UNE.. .� K 260 \0.5_IL Fff- '254 .250 ir \vlpo \ ryM: Iwo 6RAMS•T' �,e, '', Rve.',P `/!%vN`�Or r.,,�j� • / j. f- / sb / 249 z 1�p' a b ''v: / • ' \ I I 1 .15' o" AGcE55 EA5EMENi Irlo 1e5' . to PKECEIVED ILL 1�p �V � ,,lAN 1 1 ' 2001 b 'r�% F;',D. .BUILDING DEFT. EXCAVATION 3 FILL 461 CUBIC ,YARDS- (1) 45'x12'X5' dIV by 2 = 80 cu yd (2) 60'x25'x10' dIV by 2 = 277 cu yd ?�, �~KNR KGFx-Z L "� • 8884 p (3) 24'x2O'x5' d Iv by 2 = 44 cu yd .- ,r'.4. ,: T , CT (4) 16'x40'x5'div by 2 = 60 Gu yd in, �� " . k � ..• �• / no•unt.m't.'Aq.t;Mrr+r. atoo � • . . A2' '� S1ATE OF W cNurlen rrormi'l uNrt• T'_•- -_ .,..'. • j NINGTON GRAIN 51110 '`EI.EGT SnrD Ex*T sEWCP STUD' '•YIATER MET[P COTEM: ADING, FILL 4 EXCAVATION PLAN INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE AT LOG; SHOWN PLUS ANY LOCATION NECESSARY TO PREVENT DAMAGE'•,•TO ADJACENT PROPERTY Q STREET • eoe PLOT PLAN 1" = 20'=0 LEGAL DE5CRIPTION 1` LOT #4, FLAT'OF HARBOR HILLS, CITY OF EDMON05, 5NCHOMI5H COUNTY, WA5HINOTON T/SX. mac) --1-149 -000 o-,y+ HEIGHT CALCULATION5 (A) 264.0 +(B) 24-1.0 +(C) 235.0 +(D) 23-1.0 = 986 DIVIDED BY 4 = 246.5(AVERA6E GRADE) + 25-0" = 2-11.5'(MAX HEIGHT ALLOWED) loo TYLINE- 7' doo 250 EXISTINGW%oll 110 p 245 ....... . .. .15'-O'AC4ESS, EA5EMEN* 7 0 HIGH -r-O' UTILITY EASEMENT L.=31 PROPERTY LINE EX15T 61 Pvr- Roo DRAIN STUB * EXIST SEWER STUB 'ELECT STUB WATER METER NORTH L L Ole- NRECE6it 1 Ez1o' JAN 1 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS - Z't5 - 2'10 2(o57 ?od Z� • 2Sd I.SkS 5- 5ECTION @ CENTER OF PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH'�o DECEIVE® JAN 1 1 2001 20� B T. Zaa 25S I 2� �3S A- 5ECTION 0 NORTH PROPERTY LINE LOOKING NORTH 3Lvfo EET FIL 1, TZ*W-7 40 C- 5ECTION SOUTH PROPERTY LINE LOOKING NORTH copy Vol -1 27, z (23G Zo vi .110 (2 Vol /o Vo z y x (c,.,�1� J"�.7:f 8.0� -�3 L, Y--ZL sC 2 —E C, 2, -1) o q , i col = 1� t� `} X 6� X S(=�- ��` ��1.1 -° AL V0 I 24\ Vol, ��x (�z 2 3,5 Vol= G 75 -(�:3 VO/ RECEIVED JAN 1 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTA. IqLE CITY OF EDMONDS 0 . . 0 i Vol-= 31)41g (2y3 — -2 aaD = -5- svop a Wiz) � -Z—) /%/0 1 / -Z (43 t6 vo 214 ,J Cr X 11 Z �50 L Vol 2--3 yz4o RF-cF.IVED. 9v x IC) Y I JAN I 1 2001 BUILDING DEPT. 7:>jcr Tc:'� i ZO(ol 4r 1 o y S + $?OF+,(4a t 390 -+3/7L (os to + + FSO 4 6 swo 4., (=?,.q 33-z7,S ca Se + A /O 1/0l 2 0 5 �C !Y7 7 U vo 1 e c I`1 P 0 Vol O t 414 5ec--4 C G: I y � 4 -+ - x 7 X Ve .3 2:� 1) 9 z.g Sew+2,y 4L7 -4 40 X l0 1Z0y r ve wo Uo f c.E fj 41.E y W 4 s t Z7 W 3:i0 -k 25 -t sL -t-1 v?A SSA + 1 O50 + yci3 4 eITS 1-1.7ZZ"C' `r40 301(i a-r I 1 �{ (� r� c3 RECEIVED JAIN 1 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS 12/29/2000 11:11 4258289443 DODDS raeoftiences Znc. Post Office Box 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Tel: 425.827.1084 Fax: 425.828.9443 Keith Dibble 516 Home Land Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject. Plan Review Lot 4, Harbor Hills Edmonds, Washington HAVE A GREAT DAY 9 Reference: 1) Set of Plans (Sheets 1 through 8) By Ron McNurlen, Architect 2) Site and Drainage Plan By C. Shawn O'Brien, P.E. Dear Mr. Dibble: Job Number 8046 December 29, 2000 PAGE 01 (RECEIVED JAN 1 1, 2001 BUILDING DEPT. We have reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the ,above referenced plans and found they are in conformance with our geotechnical engineering report. Our analyses indicate there is less than a thirty percent (<30%) probability of a landslide on this property over the next 25 years. The proposed on -site improvements increase the stability of the site by providing slope reinforcement via walls and contro;.led drainage. Please note that cut and fill quantities for this project should be calculated assuming that the foundation excavation will extend approximately three feet beyond the footing edges and then extend up at about a. 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) slope. A fluff factor of about 15% should be used in calculating quantities of export. In our judgment the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report and the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the report. The proposed development does not increase the potential for slope movement. A representative from our firm should be on site during excavation and grading to monitor and assess conditions. 12/29/2000 11:11 4258289443 HAVE A GREAT DAY PAGE 02 DIBBLE PLAN REVIEW December 29, 2000 December 29, 2000 Page 2 Please contact me directly if there are any questions. Thank you, DODDS Geosciences Inc. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. i 516 Homeland Drive Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 640 5434 September 12, 2000 Dear Sir: We the applicant believe that the accuracy of all permit submittal information is warranted and in a form which relieves the City and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such permit application submittals.. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the City, all conclusions shall be those of the applicant and her/his design professions and, 2) we, the applicant, understand and accept the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that we will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective lessees of structures on the site, of the potential of the area. 1 1 Keith Dibble Pegg,.le 9 / 1 (3c Date Date DECEIVED. JAN 1 1, 2001 BUILDING DEPT. EET ALE �,. 5EP-12-00 TUE 10:33 AM MCNURLEN 360 5689083 • P. 08 APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BX: DATE: PAGE OF STATE OF, WASHINGTON ) • ) ss: COUNTY OF . 15141O rni S h ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that )CI h Dibble .Pec4w Anne Dibble signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this �) day of�o DEBRA L. BER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 8, 2003 L.-MMMUILDINGWEADO WWO VENAAIT NOTARY PUBLIC ,I_- 2 My commission expires: 4 RECEIVED JAN 1 1,2001 BUILDING DEPT. RON MfNURLEN ■ AROAEGT 402 Avenue A ❑ Snohomish, Washington 98290 ❑ (360) 563-0249 I HAVE REVIEWED THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT JOB # 8046, DATED JUNE 4, 1998, PREPARED BY DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. AND UNDERSTAND THE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ELUCIDATED WITHIN. I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE OWNER THE POTENTIAL RISK OF LOSS DUE TO SLIDES OR OTHER UNPREDICTABLE GEOLOGICAL ACTIVITY INVOLVED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROJECT FOR THIS SITE. TO THE BEST OF MY. KNOWLEDGE, THE RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED REPORT HAVE BEEN HEEDED AND ESTABLISHED MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO REDUCE THE POTENTIAL RISK OF INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE FROM ANY EARTH MOVEWNT PREDICTED WITHIN THE REPORT. D (�Za mCNURLEN, APmdHITECT DATE RECEIVED JAN 1 1, 2001 BUILDING DEPT. Y _ATh Y Date: To: STREET FILE MEMORANDUM May 21, 2001 File Plan Check PC-01-014 and -StreetiFile 1116 Daley Place From: Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner Subject: Stream Crossing Mr. Keith Dibble has applied for a building permit (Plan Check number PC-01-014) to construct a single-family residence at 1116 Daley Place which is lot 4 of the Harbor Hills subdivision. This lot previously had two critical area variance requests to allow development closer than normally allowed to a steep slope under files V-98-154 and V-2000-71. The plot plan for the 1998 variance clearly showed a stream on the site, but staff apparently never spoke with the applicants about also requesting a critical areas variance for construction to be closer than normally allowed to the stream. Mr. Dibble has pointed out that the neighboring property (lot 3) was allowed to place the stream in a culvert where their driveway crossed (see attached driveway plan for lot 3), and he wished to do the same thing. After reading the plat conditions, staff felt it unlikely that Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife would approve additional covering of the creek. However, the City has received a letter from Tony Opperman, Area Habitat Biologist for the Department of Fish and Wildlife (see attached letter dated March 20, 2001), in which he states that as long as the project follows the City of Edmonds requirements for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control (TESC), there is no need for a Hydraulic Project Approval. He states that their main concern at this location is for water quality and the installation of a culvert should be done in the drier summer months. Edmonds Community Development Code Section 20.15B.1203 gives the requirements for stream crossings. Staff is considering the stream to be a category 2 stream without salmonids, though it is possible that it is actually a category 3 stream. Mr. Dibble has submitted a letter addressing the criteria (see attached letter dated April 5, 2001). Because the source of the stream is being covered and the culvert will connect with an existing culvert across lot 3, staff is less concerned with having native vegetation providing habitat on lot 4. Therefore, the TESC plan and standard landscaping associated with single-family dwellings will be considered adequate stabilization. It is also noted that a small portion of the stream may be beyond the edge of the driveway, but since the concern in this area is for water quality, covering the remaining stretch of creek is being allowed. Don Fiene, former Hydraulics Engineer for the city, confirmed that grass -lined swales City of Edmonds cza Community Services are good for filtering oil out of water, but in this location, that is not so much of a concern: Covering the remaining portion of the creek might actually benefit the water quality by keeping out fertilizers and pet feces. With the commitments in Mr. Dibble's letter, and with the requirements for drainage and TESC normally required by the City with buildings permits, the criteria in ECDC 20.15B.1203 are met. Therefore, staff is authorizing the stream crossing to allow the Dibble driveway as shown on the building permit plans. State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard - Mill Creek, Washington 98012 - (425) 775-1311 March 20, 2001 V, City of Edmonds, Community Service Dept. 'f=s� ?810, Planning Division - ATTN: Ms. Meg Gruwell 121 - 5 h Avenue N. r Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Ms. Gruwell: SUBJECT: Site development by Mr. Keith Dibble The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) was contacted by Mr. Keith Dibble in early March of last year regarding his proposed purchase and development of a land parcel on Daley Place. Mr. Dibble asked about the possible need for a Hydraulic Project Approval from WDFW to install a culvert to access the site. I offer the following comments at this time. Other comments may be offered as the project progresses. On Monday, March 20, 2000, I made a visit to the site proposed for development by Mr. Dibble. We discussed his proposal for installing a culvert for a driveway, across the small spring flowing along the_ south side of the property. I suspect this water eventually contributes to. the flow of Shell Creek. As long as City of Edmonds BMPs for Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation control are followed, there is no need for a Hydraulic Project Approval from WDFW. The spring on the site is one of many headwater sources for the streams that are found in the Edmonds area. At this location our main concern is for water quality. Installation of a culvert, if done in the drier summer months and following BMPs, should have no significant impacts to downstream fish habitat. WDFW will not be requiring an HPA for this work. If you have questions regarding these comments, feel free to contact me at (425) 379-2309. Sincerely, "r Tony Oppermann Area Habitat Biologist TO:to I Ms. Meg Gruwell Community Service Department Planning Division 121 5th Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Ms. Gruwell: AP KEPT. April 5, 2001 Plan Check # 01-014 In response to your City of Edmonds Plan Review corrections memorandum dated March 6, 2001, I will make certain that best management practices will be maintain and used during construction to insure that water quality is maintained at all times. The construction period shall be done during summer low periods. The driveway is designed and located to conform to topography, and will be maintained to prevent erosion and restriction of the natural movement of groundwater as it affects the stream. The driveway is designed to minimize the area of disturbance to the stream and appears to be constructed to minimize adverse impact on the hydrologic quality of the stream or associated habitat. With respect to the retaining walls, no walls will. be built within five feet of the tow of the slope unless another variance is obtained, or, as.in the recently happened, the regulations are change. I trust this letter will be sufficient to clear up questions concerning the impact of the project on the ground water run-off and the retaining wall issue as it relates to the five- foot setback. Sincerely, < � � � D/_ �' �- Keith Dibble Owner of Lot 4, Harbor Hills ATE RECEIVED t -•• , - PERMIT EXPIRES -� CITY OF EDWNDS ZONE PERMIT �? ?,()� � Dq��, � -• 1 2- NUMBER ;! CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JODRESS SUITE/APTN E- OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS L t , PLAT NAME/SUB I N LOT NO. LID NO. A t { yI 7 r • w MAILING ADDRESS r I li LID FEE'$ Z 3 O CITY - - - Approved 0 PUBLIC RIGHT O 1 WAY PER O ICIAL STREET MAP TRW permit Required Street Uee Pe mk Req'd O EXISTIN6-1��P�jD wZIP TELEPHONE �4 .{.sue /Vo"„„. / Inspection Requited sidewalk Requited 1JO Q REQUIRED DEDICATION FT a ,.: i Wiring euund Wiring requitetl NAME 7 c METE ZE JI' LINE SIZ7,E `i'~� NO. FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED y / C 8 YES NO C3 Z ADD SS j C REMARK OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE ZIP i� % ®� % 4. j C +�'� / rR �/�' o+ C.. e . �%t 1 !" 6SA "• �lsCITY } 1 4.�� fl _k-F.'" r 1- 1 1 .. /� 1.. ✓ 13TELEPHONNE! ��y e�� :�i 3 _02 Z I NAME ir ENGINEERING REVI WE DAT •� ADDRESS ��- a -, , � 1 .. +w" FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE ¢_ CITY + / ZIP TELEPHONE +25 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EkPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY C, II VARIANCE R CU 1� �� SHORELINE OR ADBN i sgOl INSPECTION REO'D BOND POSTED �, TJ • f �� qq-h^^• 0 C i •—OYES" NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSE a PROPERTY TAX ACCQUNT PARCEL NO. EXP . .... } G� �} y NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH ///""'"^^•" �, LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR COMPLIANCE OR AUDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE / -,y n !� Z� 1 'i 2s l�t�. 4i, r, Z ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT 01 SIIPNJ , Z g a PARKING REO'D PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE Yil6lai ❑ REPAIR, G 01 FENCE ❑ 1 Z REMARKS 4 K( I7fIWCa� +Yoe/ , CYDS ( X FT) ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER GARAGE (� RETAINING WALL RENEWAL ❑ iNd)- GkL, '(Y1(* 144 ,V,14^eA Il-AA ' 7 Au I:ti. c 2 5� CARPORTROCKERX OF USE �USINESS R ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: '"' a(TYP& oaf CHECKED F. S BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION C E OCCUPAN GROUP o (CUMBER i- NUMBER OF CRITICAL SPECIAL P CTOR REQUIRE AREA ji �%ri�' �� tAu OCCUPANT LOAD to O OF STORIES �� DWELLING /� UNITS %�� AREAS F NUMBER��`�` YES �ia DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPE TION REO'D t7 o �x Z m t�sl -q fz 11cox c: t�e�r� 9,iftf8 MCT : 70 14fito# � �1 .... r VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE : � Ng %v LOT SLOPE % , t r BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO:� VESTED DATE PLUMBING 00 THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO MECHANICAL ' BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL C, / to � SEPARATE PERMISSION. a et h t v1 lfyall.if� ,�. 2 W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS STATE SUR HARGE 3o a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN .180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION ENG. REVIEW FEES " N 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF QEDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND 04igS{O d`"1 /rQnO LJ 7 IN✓ LRNPf3CAPM �t7 �� !! ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY c' = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE RECE PT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT JtJ /l = NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEIP 17 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE e I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT 1 AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S C ,1 SATION INSURANCE,IND RCW 18.27. FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in apace provided. SIIaCyAT}IFi WNE� RAC��NT % DATE SIGNED /AnC` O5� I SSIGNATyRE DA�Ej Cry'. d 771-022044 RELEA Y DATE ATTENTION EXT 333 " IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 �.�.�� h A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR FAX PINK 5/98 -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR icy ��- �, D ► � h 1 �e J 1 Ifsley �1 200209090680 P-0002 RECORDED County CRITICAL AREA AND/OR CRITICAL AREA BUFFER NOTICE Property Address: / ( I & i7,q I e- Fla c e Edmonds, Washington Assessor's Parcel Number: 0o -7:Zgq QQ_ 00 OO Present Owner: Ke_41,, _L> j b Jc,_ NOTICE: This property contains one or more critical areas or their buffers as defined by Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.15B. The property was the subject of a development proposal for G( Gl�l�T Gat/ Gtl�eGts Isar/a%C�, (type of permit) application # _�/� �pQQ- 7 / filed on h Z j 4_2_-Q2O . Restrictions on (date) use or alteration of the critical areas or their buffers may exist due to natural conditions of the property and resulting regulations. Review of the above application has provided information on the location of the critical area(s) or critical area buffers and restrictions on their use through setback areas. A copy of the plan showing such critical area(s), buffers, and setback areas is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. PropertyOwner Signature: �o Date:? Z 7 Q 2— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that l�P/77�7 �U,(1k signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Notary s uYA."joust be smudged. Dated: �,cc�C �\ �5S►�N 0 0 Signature of . o NOTARY ; Notary Public: :V i PUBLIC i Fitt s9 :, ID. o� : ; Residing at: ,� •...••• _ - My Appointment. Expires: THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR. � FT BILE STREET FILE `1\ 1 ar-o PZ4A YMID I1 A` a Exhibit 1 18442 _EX. Co" TILE P/PE 1190 U) I o Jul r L J 0 JNI A ED J J r J O J\J ,I y N690aa,a8"W I I 100.55' 1 t /I F EX. CREEK � 4 <0P t 1 � INV. /(90.97 • I I N l I I °i I j 1 ' •� 1 j t I I 1 I I I i I I I t I t 3 11 I i i ► � I I 3 V m i i Q P 6j I t bO No p _ \ I I ? 1 I 1 I I 1 I EX. C. %. 1 TOP 183.88 INV. 180.?rb I t I BUIC 0/NC9 t SETBACK LINE (rYP. ) lit, - A�' - -- - - - - \_ _ — �W \\ \a02a j o09 2� 3p EX. 6 "PA10 SIDE SEWEfi' /,/ 2� EX. 8" PvC a / 00' PR/Vr4l E UTILITY ESM Tj IG' W40KW4Y ESM'T "RSPNIQL Q Z y TWLK vas t `� J / (3) ELEC. STU85 3 0 ` '7' UTILITY ESM'T Ex. C.f3. f. EGAL ,DE SCRIPTI Al L076 4 AND 8, PLAT OF U4R80R LULLS, CITY OF E0A.101V05 SNOI•40"1514 COUNTY, 014514INOTON. BEAK" MARK TOP OF CASED CONC. MONUMENT LOCATED CEN TER OF CUL - DE - SAG. ELEVATION: 02q-45 047UM CITY OF EDMONDS (LEGEND @ — EX. C-45EO CONC. MONUMENT O — EX. IRON PIN W/PLASTIC C4P /\IO'O 9H91 NOTE N Q% I \ I O ` TELE. PE77. AULT 1 LI t,1 L) ttj / J � ttl '; • Q> j � � tl7 tt, -Z > ' t(.'7,:: N Q\ of fz �oQ `N X'AD to V Vip 1�1\I V'Uj 1 Qph ,ti o•i'9F� •�g3' �Y 1 \\Z�Qe�TB L•, 0t\ Q O23F m 3 '�' \ Q� Q n 3 0 s S� ' „ � EX. <o PVC � •\ 2 ? 2'��p�rr � � �; � � � -WATER \ 3� ° 3�0 �� G\�c� ROOF ORAITUg �� IZ°`�'I i ` \\ N ` METERS �h ti J N LE !,E C. STU$ I t � . Q.k1• 12a \ �.^ ..'�':,� ''��\ \ 1�' °•-- J4U.D. VAULT 1 2010 ' °% � J \ Z y 9i \\ °; METE),? p �?• yeti' o rZa�'� �� ygla �\ ' \ VERTICAL CURB .."\ �_,.--• �, 1 Z"STEEL E ( _ G+ • CJ Qi ZAP• I 7' UTILITY E t/� M'T �` ro"PVC N �. c� q ' �'q, C• •,• `�• '� � \ ROOF DRAIN a� � R1 q Sl �L, rY EX ssm" °0 z Ex. C.8. THIS MAP SLIOWS ONLY THOSE E46EMEAITS 4NO SET840K L /NES TU4T APPEAR ON TI-1 F: RECOROEO PLAT OF l AlRBOR UILL5• T"IS AMP DOES NOT PURPORT TO SNOW ALL E46EA,fEN77S OR ENCUM5ERCA106S M4T WY EXIST; f IrI46R RECORDED OR UN RECORDED. n- /2. 69 SPECIAL SET84CI< REQUIREMENT .Np x ; x 2 ttl F FROM WATER COURSE TO BE s DETERMINED 4T TIME OF BUILDING PERM IT APP6104TION 4l N ( M I N• 15' FROM TOP OF 8ANIS)tri p y: y�Y+p tper+ CC ® , 2 n Nk2fi 0 6 2001 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY � A PERMIT COUNTER FOR I ' PUGET SOUND COMMERCIAL, INC• N. E. 1/4, SECTION 24, T. 27 N., R. 3 E., W. M. CITY OF EDMONDS WASH INGTOW. � " z .:..: f I.00 ATE A TDE .O c 40 7. sL0,46 ON L.OT4 (Ff3 4Q2C, PG 7(0) 8'20-98 ` 5C•8 wit Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc., Engineers / Surveyors / Planners / Development Consult, 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite -200 • Lynnwood, WA 98037 • (206) 775.1591 (206) 340...O$3O DRAWN CHECKED DATE F.B. SCALE r11.206. MM 50 10-1z- 89 343 1 v AUG Q 6 Z�n1 STREET FILE PERMIT COUNTER 118442 '90, I o INr L SJN ADDITION ,8s � � 2. a N (VJLUj\./Jr 19 , PAGE 5 J) 4 qai zy lV 89' ,34 ' Z8 " W i _EX. Co' TILE PIPE EX. 8" PvC &' 4SPN4LT WALK i 46 c lSQ � i tL 2�y i (3) ELEC. STUBS I/ '7' UTILITY ESM'T �\ EX. C.B. 0� I-E6,4C. DESCRIPTION LOTS 4 AND 8, PLAT OF L14R80R I-JiLLS, CITY OF EDMONDS " SNOgOM1514 COUNTY, WAS14INGTON• BENC.J MARK TOP OF CASED CONC'. MONUMENT LOCATED @ CENTER OF CUL - CE - S4C. ELEV4TION: 02q.45 C4TUM C/TY OF EDMONCS LEGENO O - EX. CASED CONC. MONUMENT O - EX. IRON PIN W/P(-ASTIC CAP NO'O 989 f NOTE THIS MAP SLOWS ONLY Ti40SE EASEMENTS 41VC SET8401{ L INES TU4T APPEAR ON r"E RECORCEC PLAT OF 414ROOR 4/ILLS. 7-9/6 M.4P ODES NOT PURPORT TO S,UOW ALL EASEMENTS OR ENCU"OERENCES T414T MAY EXIST, E/T4EJ� RECOROEC OR UNRECORCEo JAN 1 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT CTR. OF EDMONDS C) LL. ), L� tLl t� L� 1 ttl ttl Q ' —1 UL1 (D Za2 ..2g Zu' car \rSvn. � ^ .-. y —T' TOP BF BQNI�C �a �\ not,=' STEEL P/PE ( E\`� N\ p.�a� �� i �� Li] \ i k E M 'T91 (D 1IREME T - i1 �11 i`1 1 L^l 'O OE r7 ,HU/LD/NC ' � � Ul �s� 1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR I PUGET SOUND COMMERCIAL, INC. N. E. 1/4, SECTION 24, T. 27 N., R. 3 E., W. M. CITY OF EDMONDS, WASH I NGTON LOC ATE Q ME O F 407.6LOFL ON LOT4 (F6 4OZC, PG 710) 8-20-98 SG8 ///� mcl�7y P(./, ,DeaI3 Z, 5 - v/s.0110 M�w @ WE itio a ., 0-1- RECEIVED JAN 1 1 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT #4, PLAT OF HARBOR HILLS, CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY TAX LOT: 7749-000-004-007 SURVEY DATA AS —BUILT PLANS FOR PLAT OF HARBOR HILLS LOVELL—SAUERLAND & ASSOCIATES, INC. RIM = 211.87 IE = 207.71 �E�IE = 207. 0 S RIPS .= 215.09 ' IE m 202.04 N IE = 202.14 S {�� u:a. _ ', � �'�"�.'�E 2�k._.. dui,Nos R,3 W 1� S' n(( ■��iv N`„-L%I d ' ' _"� EX IE = 204,88 OVERFLOW EX SS MIS EXTEND RIM = 207.45 FABRIC IE = 198.84 (S IE = 203.25 (N) PRESSURE TREATED 2"x8" STAKED ® 4' TOP DF BOARD LEVEL FOR ENTIRE TRENCH -LINE TRENCH w/FILTER FABRIC, MIRIFI 140 OR EQUAL DRAIN ROCK 1-1 /2" TO 3/4" WASHED GRAVEL APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERING No FIEL DLO ATI N OF INTERCEPTO TREN H T B REVIEWED BY � ONS LTIN E GINEER � ACCEPTANCE TIGHTLINE SDR 35 MATERIAL CH 40 N -12 F310 HANCOR EXPIRES: 7/19/01 Design By: CSO Drawn By: TLR Scale: 1" = 10' Da e: MAY14. 2001 I INTERCEPTO DRAIN I I I I ♦ I M m m I'm z C. SHAWN 01BRIEN, RE, CONSULTING ENGINEER 16716 S.E. 28th STREET - BELLEVUE, WA 98008 PH. (425) 746-3992 Sheet 1 of 2 Job No. 00-09 For: KEITH DIBBLE SITE 516 HOMELAND DRIVE and EDMONDS, WA 98020 ph. (425) 640-5434 DRAINAGE PLAN RIM = 211,87 IE = 207.71 �E� IE = 207.50 S RIM = 215.09 ' IE = 202.04 N IE = 202.14 S - '--,EX IE .— 2044 88 ME 1/4, SEC. 24, T. 27 Nap Ro3 E., WoMe U U Li U U U I_=I/ \''/ Li LS Li " Li I = �`"� STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC ��.::rr"{zjx�a�r�.:ve�,:wc-;� � ia,ra,�rr«w•�ic��naua�.� � — fF abM1\"43X;Uf1Ydvd:A„1}bYi — P,2'tim)aYiM1B1Pmmm JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE SPLICED WATER & SEWER INSPECTIONS RE4'n GALL 426.771.0220 EXT.1326 2"x2"04 Ga. WIRE OR — EQUIVALENT IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED EX SS MH1I- I207. E=mm198,845S 42 IE = 203.25 N) \ GRATE i i 5, M i MIN 4'x4' TRENCH Ltw—�� LJ' POST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED �L BACKFILL TRENCH WITH C\TCH B IN TO 8' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED WASHED GRAVEL 3/4 1.5 �� J NOTE. FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED 2"x4' WOOD POSTS, STEEL ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE FENCE POSTS, REBAR, OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED AS NOTED RY ENGINEERING RECEIVED MAY 15 2001� PERMIT COUNTER FILTER FENCE DETAIL NO SCALE f� 1 J, i J Oi oiy olg&e A le � IAI-'I')l 16 RLCEIVE:D v. MAY 15 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. ` j CITY OF EDMONDS 100636 t ' _ jli4 k. JJ � ' ET DR1 Ex. eocEev , I r� 1. s i i i �'l ��Y � .." ��. � ✓ � \ ram. � +• � ._9 .Y- - ;r 1'' '" !y r � � � \` �.�` ,� � 9�i fly �•{1 1�1 i.� H D9A/ki SEE pE7"A IL. - 7-y MAP 40 TOP OF CASE LOCATED 2��- � � 22 ,47' r_ 4ffA T7F_ 9 Gar-: Cl�',:. � _� SAC D OAILEY PLACE �- y �' \ u- v CUT - 77 cll. Yes :� I,c�a.�,ey �� .F�'` ��'� �' ��j // �_- -245 /� .'�� "-�� • F1LU Yo_S , A,� 2EC�'D ,/ _ �' �� // I —Z, _`_` f/; . TOTAL = 9 (o CU. Yl�S '4 / r "° -- ALAZ >IaOx, j I`Z PIP, .':..•'. Ir 'r;�t:•� 9 / .71 / - 14.v;<h: �.J`�� \ '�_� i ILI LOCO f �� / _ r�� / krl,�„� L0901A / RHIs Lot 3 ,> .e v `� / \ !L �h / / ► ^) f/'� �� `� �- ,,�� GENERALFZ vl ' ;�q, �� `�D EARTH GR + a, ° `9f3;'�, is n�Ita m.wnr WALL$ A' - \ E U OF q, PAVIW. SEC ON AS PEr, DESIGN SK`C7F ;,.7fa4 c� X. 20 l� D. Uo. i �. l S / S v0 Cam. ELECT,2/C oQ 24 O ' �� `'. � - � l T,2F4,uSM/SS/o,u ,4,vv � \ ✓� FjA_ /V ! I LJ Ar A 6/ f / 6F.an cu,vEloi .P'_1u .r is :Tll-SALl Ala0 { ASxcfart 5, lr+c.Q-1 >.i�`�- • t �,i ; ryy, of J`T,21 i3uTlo,U L/,UE c.,.lir nJ..� {",hz. Y ,•'�._,7`l".s 'L r� Y 5 t� Af ��CJ C . /l/ ToC./ /�. / / %EU % cnS:nDc c ))tcslvunl _ FABRIC 3 � Y —�1 cn1 cc vc> e�,o oc t<ul, r r to C_ z isA AS PER ;�ECIFiCA7IONS F'. , ,,'. _� / E %A 1 m .aw. �w,snmm D-1557 EH S t n IOC�t,O,:s ntt( <.PfflO�nawTE - OVERLAP 7�. ,�Y��„a• 7 ?4„ ' �. ' � k`..t c' It LIFTS TO 955 .aST�? t r : �1 OF ! OTEXTILE =.oBR?.0 `� as i 5' 1 �� WITH 2' B_TWEEN 1_AYERS � 1. �/ 171U"' \\ , .'. B ., / �/ %5' SA,vfT,�',eY \ � _ _ , C�•f` eF�'�T. y'k.��i ��, �t t o- '' „ar • `"'rf ``� + !� l / t B / / ' iEWE 2FiQSEMEUTiw. 3 �� ,r: 1'. ' � 2' INITIAL LCO;E LIFT !� � DETAfL✓r- 0457_,01 0 ,�FZ M GEOTEXTILE FABRIC a rho ry � fit_- \ AS L /M 11`� OF RE) �LJFDF_CEDocle , T r — / I \ (��FJQ /�-� /�T /'7 S ^ f?� �9 SIS: T •':'� Sv9GRADE AS .DETERMINED IN FIELD EAR fY\ �fL L _ _ _ _ / / LLl \ /� / . / t 9 i_ 0, t Jc� jj ` a4Fi f41.1 ��i'�.YP.) r_" , _ 1 I r' �J05 4 �?h�O II � , i ��t / ..Aj o /o'53 W �' /3�. 54 , C1-, f� CLILVE2T \\ / / /� // I NOTE: {4RIC SlHOU'_D BE COATED AS REQUIRED > PRQTECT At;,AIOST ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN. CASCADE GFOTECHNICAL L'910 -tvG SCAT E r NOT TO '� diL . iA A D'YN 1V C< CASCADE T[571N(•i 0JQ. W1DRY, W. Del. aw., &q Ewy casw,�.E taaT,JnAcE csacw,o.wns�«lacm,geo3a •LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ' - MICIFV,D POO&?I.$ 0 UATTL1:WW52S6T00 .......... �................................................................................:............................................................................................... .. 10/27/89 r ........_ ...... ....... ._....... ...... .............................. .. ......... .. ........ .. ............... .. HLA �. o .. . :. .. :... . . ....................... .....: .. :! :. .......... . fCUL DEC) .:: :.i.:. :. ,. . '.. f. YA eo D 2L!!GJ . nn :. �i� /�le C-7