Loading...
1131 B AVE (2).pdfCITY OF EDMONDS EXHIBIT HEARING EXAMINER 2 4 APPLICATION APPLICANT CITY & ZIP R VAR INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTERES LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY VARIANCE REQUESTED: 1 —1 —i) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: ) , -1 1 — FIl V- 7-, DATE 1Z2.trr% 71 FEEI'1114/-� c'o NCE RECT APO'S HEARING DATE: ADDRESS_ —PHONE-2_,� :y IN PROPERTY < j A ock In CV Release/Hold Harmless Agreement The undersigned applicant, his heir i b and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the applicationlagrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attor.eys' fees arising from any action � or inaction is based in whole or impart upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applic nt, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants hi her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City�of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and post g)attendant 0 thi 3. D cation. L ..Sfffa6dre-ofApplicant, Owner or Representative t ........ . . .... ......... .ii1 EXHIBIT DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT j Please answer all questions What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? SEE ATTACHED I ,r 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? i 4i SEE ATTACI-fED 3. Will this 'variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to P g g E. other property or improvements in the vicinity? a a SEE ATTACHED j s, 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? 4 SEE ATTACHED 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? SEE ATTACHED i r 'A 1 4 EXHIBIT 3 ; G 'ANSWERS TO DECLA[UTIONS OF APPLICANT 1. Our property has a sloping topography, with the majority of the slope I being west and a*minor slope to the south. The major slope to the west is the hardship, in that there is a 21 foot drop in elevation from the { alley at the northeast corner down to "B" Avenue. This drop in elevation is due'to the fact that "B" Avenue drops down at our lot, where the alley S elevation remains constant. 2. All properties on the east side of "B" Avenue, except ours, .are approximately" ; at the same elevation. The other properties do not have the drastic difference in elevation that' we do because of the drop in "B"' Avenue. Our ., property is the last lot on the street and adjoins city property to the s south." 3.;;If granted, the variance would not affect ;any views or damage any properties or improvements in the neighborhood. But, to the contrary, the variance would enhance. the look of the houses already. on the east side of !'B" Avenue because a1 the overall 'look would be more symmetrical. { r j 4. The resulting hardships would be: A. We feel that the average elevation of 231 feet would locate our house A� too much lower than the ;house to the north. The difference of approximately 7 feet on the north boundry would mean'a rockery or t retaining wall, resulting in an unattractive living area. B. The difference in elevation from the alley, to our backyard would result in a steep grade, dropping approximately 11 feet: *� G Page 2 1 T EXHIBIT I (Answer 4:continued) These hardships would be caustic} by ,the lay of the land in conjunction i trictions, with present building height resnot by our'own actions: 1 i � S. We purchased the property with the intention o£ maintaining the present I grades and elevations using gentle slopes from he alley and adjacent 1 , steep declines'. 1n'1981 the building height restriction was properties,nat lowered by S feet. We feel the resulting calculations would cause unreasonable use of our property. x SU*ARY for this 3 foot height variance because we feel this would We are asking put,our home at a more a ppropriate'�elevation in relation tothe other. homes in the vicinity, p lus,' relieving us from the steep declines mentioned. We will bring fill in around the house to the main floor"level on the t west, north and 'east sides, discouraging a "tdo ta21" look and bringing, the yard up to a closer level to the immediate neighbor. making our yard AA more compatable`to.his. We are not asking far a grant af,specia1 privilege to our: property in, comparison with 'limitations'upon other properties in the neighborhood, but; ;. have the overall topography of our property considered, not justthe 1 to building envelope, when finding our paint of height limitation. 4 . gM1j k EC i i V• G'� f, i. XHIBIT 4 '�?i 'i') � ,•'f CITY, OF E DMOi\ D$. 42 00 MX / /, ,`, S1i✓t ,r:1✓l/cw; a PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER s FILE #V-7-82 HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 1982 1" I REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to the required height limit of twenty-five feet - at 1131 „B„ Avenue. fi II APPLICANT/OWNER: Dennis 0ftedahl 7714 234th.Street S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: South half of Lot 8, Block 10, Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds. IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: t A. Description of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The. subject property contains approximately 7,500 square feet of ! land. It is, undeveloped. Some clearing and grading has been done on the property to ready it for construction of a house. The property slopes generally in a southwesterly direction, with a twenty foot elevation change, from the east property line to the west property line. Exhibit 4 clearly shows the topography that existed prior to the grading that has been done on the lot. Building height will be calculated from the figures shown on that exhibit.. t. Development to the north and west is single family residential. 1 To the east are two vacant lots which are vacant. An old reservoir site owned by the City abuts the subject property to the south. B. official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W West ---"B" Avenue 60` 601 f East - Alley 20' 20' C. Conformance to Chapter 20.85.010 1. Special Circumstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in that the topography of the lot is somewhat unique. The lot has remained undeveloped for a long period of time, due to the fact that drainage in the area had previously saturated the lot. The applicant has done a f PLEASE i NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT NEARING Exhibit 1/File #V-7-82 Pie 2 a lot of work to correct this situation. Still the building pad should be located away from the southwest corner as'it still appears quite wet. 2. Special Privilege Because of the problems associated with drainage and it be granted, topography, the requested variances, should �. would not result in a grant of special privileges. 3. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the subject property as low density residential.: I The variance, should it be approved, will be consistent with j ! the Comprehensive Plan. i 1 4. Zoning Ordinance The subject property, as well as the properties to the north, 's. west, and east is zoned RS-6. 5. Not Detrimental The variance should not be significantly detrimental to any nearby private property or improvements, nor to the public +++ health, safety or general welfare. 6. Minimum Variance The variance appears to be the minimum to allow reasonable use of the property. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: t It is the recommendation of the staff that V-7-82 be approved, i building height not to exceed elevation 259. t, i 1 is` `. E - .-.r .tea .-..e....._.... _....�, <_� .. ..._ ........ - �-..:.,xa�<x_=�r_:axrza�..• ..sax'n;-.e.�-.s-n.. ..w:...l.�w .. �...w+�+rxwrs'.C:++S�+......s�at>,'weaaar.i.,'--iM-iu!;Sfw'f:d.+�4*ti;k'.^.lfe�ti�;>.suc-�r.G�-.'�s�_:.le.�v'ti�Y2J5' Uzi-'+F`++n�•wn.^.'�'i'=1+��+, EXHIBIT 4. Ewrr�ob- Haa3E i J _ El, -1 -- r Q34 MEAti Ec. t,< 7NrrelrES 6AIRr7Es ApO 64EV,1VEA.- GII+'�tti 11►4rA,�C� ; �"FN Et.�A2'v+ti �,3 r i j':t! v;- - �.tlDICM1►ES irRF/.'ES A,�f: ELEVMn,C'; V!711 A LORAMCC G s 43 FE6t MtAfv 4 '- 134 1 1 „ EXHIBIT 3 ANSWERS TO DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT 1. Our property has a sloping topography, with the majority of the slope being west and a minor slope to the south. The major slope to the west is the hardship, in that there is a 21 foot drop in elevation from the alley at the northeast corner down to "B" Avenue. This drop in elevation is due to the fact that "B" Avenue drops down at our lot, where the alley elevation remains constant. 2. All properties on the east side of "B" Avenue, except ours, are approximately at the same elevation. The other properties do not have the drastic difference in elevation that we do because of the drop in "B" Avenue. Our property is the last lot on the street and adjoins city property to the south. 3.:If granted, the variance would not affect any views or damage any properties or improvements in the neighborhood. But, to the contrary, the variance would enhance the look of the houses already on the east side of "B" Avenue because the overall look would be more symmetrical. 4. The resulting hardships would be: A. We feel that the average elevation of 231 feet would locate our house too much lower than the house to the north. The difference of 2 approximately 7 feet on the north boundry would mean a rockery or retaining wall, resulting in an unattractive living area. B. The difference in elevation from the alley to our backyard would result in a steep grade,dropping approximately 11 feet. Page 2 EXHIBIT (Answer 4 continued) These hardships would be caused by the lay of the land in conjunction with present building height restrictions, not by our own actions. 5. We purchased the property with the intention of maintaining the present y grades and elevations using gentle slopes from the alley and adjacent i t properties,not steep declines. In 1981 the building height restriction was lowered by S feet. We feel the resulting calculations would cause unreasonable use of our property. SUMMARY We are asking for this 3 foot height variance because we feel this would i put our home at a more appropriate elevation in relation to the other homes in the vicinity, plus, relieving us from the steep declines mentioned. We will bring fill in around the house to the main floor level on the west, north and east sides, discouraging a "too tall" look and bringing the yard up to a closer level to the immediate neighbor making our yard more compatible to his. We are not askingfor a special grant of s ecial privilege to our property in *' comparison with limitations upon other properties in the neighborhood, but, to have the overall topography of our property considered, not just the building envelope, when finding our point of height limitation. I FIl V- 7- 1,2 CITY OF EDMONDS DATE FEE' 0. EXHIBIT 2 HEARING EXAMINER RECT Yk APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE APO'S 7c- A,) Ic- C- HEARING DATE: APPLICANT 7 ADDRESS _r4 CITY & ZIP. —PHONE__.. INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY balp C'--L L­34 &OCIc yo�+� '(;A, 4n FW, / ,vz S Po, ,21n 7 , I V i F o-76 0-ta-e_ VARIANCE REQUESTED:_ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:— Release/Hold Harmless Agreement The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for Public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting)attendant 40 th-i's OD ica ion. 5 ig n a t Vr e o 'Applicant, - Owner or Representative EXHIBIT DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions 1. What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, s of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? SEE ATTACHED 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? SEE ATTACHED 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? SEE ATTACHED 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? SEE ATTACHED 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? SEE ATTACHED ,..144 5 1 • 1 RECEiYED . 4 4 EXHIBIT 4 1� APR 2 8 CITY, OF EDMOND.S., 97 are l :- - { 1, �, 4 i'.. Gir,r ✓�S . u�1' Z�r/Ct� � ;'� � - T•!+t' .3 �h �7� ��t �. Ci;�<. f ? �.7�nJ V-,�'rJ _ � ,tee' s /-1u <c. .!eue.*o 3 � r � t'D E O'.'r% �RC..'� j / vJ• .SIt7a r� G� n 1' r`c`�O!i:2':? .T J��� � '' �' ' t. S.3' , ? O 7 c !-e'ts..^..<.-O n l ry. go/as .9, -ke in7 p wer hole -,7houd 74',, r ^ ; of,v.w. p�epe�ty cori;er. JM.L.G.W. _ t 9 " =e'iy It -30 �f-� t S Via:.~`:1(}:�Gf'l/^`:a7A/'�'Eoi-.� n.,—a... r... . - .y4 J (( q �� �y> 2 U'� ;M�� `•A y.. �_r!? r� �c;.c :Yi r? !-_cL fi3. CSr�r;r_�J f ist y� c.,4si P w,..� t Ji/ Chi%,�r`CT1 TIT Curtis F. Dunphy Edna M. Dunnigan 1126 B Ave. 1118 B Ave. Edmonds Wa. Edmonds Wa. $ 98020 s t 98020 Leonard S. Ogle Norm Ross 1122 B Ave. 1123 B Ave. Edmonds Wa. Edmonds Wa. 98020 98020 Ernest Fourno Norvil Lindelof 1126 8th Ave. So. 820 7th Ave So. Edmonds Wa. Edmonds Wa. + 98020 t 98020 -Robert Champine Tim Murphy 1153 C St. 1136 8th Ave. So. Edmonds Wa. Edmonds Wa. 98020 98020 �'. INTER-OFirlCE COMMUNICATIONS DATE April 27 9 82 TO Dan, Plan/Eng. Inspector FROM Planning De artment Gary, Fire Department ASR FORM 141 SUBJECT: HEARING EWE NER AGENDA, MAY 24, 1982 The attached items are for your review and comments before the hearing. i of r r. 4 Gy\ C)F f m—'!C),Nlx April 28, 1982 MEMO TO: Duane Bowman Assistant Planner FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: ITEMS FOR HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA MAY 24, 1982 P-1-82 Requires one standard fire hydrant as indicated in a previous memo. CU-22-82 Approved with no comment. V-6-82 The setback from the North property line should not <t,- i be reduced. There is no objection to the reminder of the request. CU-23-82 Approved with no comment. V-7-82 Approved with no comment. GLM:be .� �.. A i ' ji ~` ` Curtis F. Dunphy 1136 8 Avenue � Edmonds, WA 98020 � Leonard S. Ogle 1122 B Avenue ! Edmonds, N8 08020 / � / Ernest Fnurno 1126 8th Avenue South ' Robert Champ1ne 1153 C Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 Edna M. Dunnigan !1118 B Avenue ` Edmonds, WA 98020 ^ Norm Ross 1I23 B Avenue / Edmonds, NA 98020 \| � �! � Norvil Lindellnf 820 7th Avenue South | Edmonds, WA 98020 Signed ad / t,n to before^me this day of Jim Murphy __ � uuo utn *vvnwe 3wuu/ Edmonds, WA 98020 Townsend being first 6oIy moozo' u ouya' � day of 'l9____, the attached � Hearing was mailed as required to adjacent |-e omnea of which were provided by the Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at ' ` � PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILE #V-7-82 HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 1982 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to the required height limit of twenty-five feet at 1131 "B" Avenue. IF. APPLICANT/OWNER: Dennis Oftedahl 7714 234th Street S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: South half of Lot 8, Block 10, Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds. IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: A. Description of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The subject property contains approximately 7,500 square feet of land. It is undeveloped. Some clearing and grading has been done on the property to ready it for construction of a house. The property slopes generally in a southwesterly direction, with a twenty foot elevation change from the east property line to the west property line. Exhibit 4 clearly shows the topography that existed prior to the grading that has been done on the lot. Building height will be calculated from the figures shown on that exhibit. Development to the north and west is single family residential. To the east are two vacant lots which are vacant. An old reservoir site owned by the City abuts the subject property to the south. B. Official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W West - "B" Avenue 60' 60' East - Alley 20' 20' C. Conformance to Chapter 20.85.010 1. Special Circumstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in that the topography of the lot is somewhat unique. The lot has remained undeveloped for a long period of time, due to the fact that drainage in the area had previously saturated the lot. The applicant has done a f n.rny I PLEASE NOTE. APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING Exhibit 1/File #V-7-82 Page 2 a lot of work to correct this situation. Still the building pad should be located away from the southwest corner as it still appears quite wet. 2. Special Privilege Because of the problems associated with drainage and topography, the requested variances, should it be granted, would not result in a grant of special privileges. 3. Comprehensive Plan !' The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the subject 1 property as low density residential. The variance, should it be approved, will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4, Zoning Ordinance The subject property, as well as the properties to the north, west, and east is zoned RS-6. 5. Not Detrimental The variance should not be significantly detrimental to any nearby private property or improvements, nor to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. Minimum Variance The variance appears to be the minimum to allow reasonable use of the property. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: i It is the recommendation of the staff that V-7-82 be approved, building height not to exceed elevation 259. j. DATE CITY OF EDMONDS FEEf11 0 EXHIBIT HEARING EXAMINER RECT �E 7 I. l =� APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE APO'S_ -- HEARING DATE: APPLICANT `�c ,OX )jIS' r�/= rr'i'7r9tf/. ADDRESS_ �% 1 _ ? �`� CITY & ZIP �' �>�1r r �?�� i' l7 '_� /5 PHONE_ INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY `�r,J,(?f-'t25 LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 11 3 / l�' - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY_ ILI VARIANCE REQUESTED: y`'... FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: ! i( '1L`� ti a t �I� Release/Hold Harmless Agreement The undersigned applicant, his heirs and assigns, in consideration for the City processing the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages and/or claims for 1 damages, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising from any action or inaction is based in whole or in part upon false, misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his agents or employees. Permission to Enter Subject Property The undersigned applicant grants his, her or its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posti g)attendant �.0 th1 plication. Signature o `Applicant, Owner or Representative EXHIBIT .3 DECI,AV&TIC?N5 OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions 1, What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? SEE_ -.ATTACH D 2. How does your property differ from other property in �iic vicinity? SEE ATTACHED 3, will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? SEE ATTACHED — i you if the 4. What hardships will result toy variance is not granted? Will these hardships have.been caused by your own action? SEE ATTACHED thout the variance? 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property wi SEE ATTACHED .,.M,,.tl.... L..- 1 . A mow.., ,,,. , ,,,...w:..,w..ii.+uuuw:w.vis+wuax:s,:raiiui+�mwwc..•,.w..,+++wuwr...,u.n.o..n..w.r y EXHIBIT ANSWERS TO OF APPLICANT 4 ' 1. Our property has a;slopiIng topography, with the majority of the slope { being west.and a•minox slope to the south. The major slope to the west hardship, in that there is a 21 foot drop 'in elevation from the 1.. is the } alley at the 'northeast corner down to "BIT Avenue. Phis drop in elevation is due to the 'fact ;that "B" Avenue drops dawn at our, lot, where the alley .` elevation, remains constant. � 2. All properties on the east side of ','BIT Avenue, except ours, are approximately �- } at the'same elevation. The other properties do not have the drastic 1 ,. difference in elevation that we do because of the drop in "B" Avenue. Our i i property. is the last lot on the street and adjoins city property to the, south.,. 3,:Tf granted, the variance would not affect>any views or damage any pro or in the neighborhood'. But, to the contrary,` the variance=would improvements enhance the "look of the houses.already on the east side of "BIT Avenue because the overall look would be more symmetrical. 1 q, The resulting hardships would be: A: We feel that the average elevation of 231 feet would locate our house too much lower tlian the house to the north. The difference of approximately 7 feet on the:,north'boundry would mean a rockexy'or kt' retaining wail; resulting in an unattractive living 'area. B. The difference in elevation.from the alley to our backyard would -result in a'steep grade, dropping approximately;11 feet. 17- EXHIBIT 4 P TR j. 4�, Edmonds, Washington 8th Avenue South Edmonds,' Washington We the undersigned neighbors of do hereby oppose the heighth variance requested by Dennis Oftedahl for the following reasons: 1. Any variance in the current height will block many of our views. We t.; pay taxes on view property. 2. All homes built since this height restriction was put into effect have j 4 i built accordingly. `Present and future property owners have the responsibility to build according to existing ordinances. ity 'is 25 feet and was set by the 3. The current height restricion in the c { Y a `city to keep our building heights at a maximum and to protect existing a ; 3i views. Let's keep it this way! Signad; NAME ADDRESS `'IZCC��� - i��'c•L Oav L��211 ( �1 � � f ' eq PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING EXHIBIT 1 STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILE #V-7-82 HEARING DATE: MAY 24, 1982 I. REQUESTED ACTION: Variance to the required height limit of twenty-five feet at 1131 "B" Avenue. II. APPLICANT/OWNER: Dennis Oftedahl 7714 234th Street S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 III. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: South half of Lot 8, Block 10, Plat of Yost's First Addition to Edmonds. IV. STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: A. Description of the Subject Property and Surrounding Area The subject property contains approximately 7,500 square feet of land. It is undeveloped. Some clearing and grading has been done on the property to ready it for construction of a house. The property slopes generally in a southwesterly direction, with a twenty foot elevation change from the east property line to the west property line. Exhibit 4 clearly shows the topography that existed prior to the grading that has been done on the lot. Building height will be calculated from the figures shown on that exhibit. Development to the north and west is single family residential. To the east are two vacant lots which are vacant. An old reservoir site owned by the City abuts the.subject property to the south. B. Official Street Map Proposed R/W Existing R/W West - "B" Avenue 60' 60' East - Alley 20' 20' C. Conformance to Chapter 20.85.010 1. Special Circumstances Special circumstances do appear to exist in that the topography of the lot is somewhat unique. The lot has remained undeveloped for a long period of time, due to the fact that drainage in the area had previously saturated the lot. The applicant has done a PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING Exhibit 1/File #V-7-82 Page 2 a lot of work to correct this situation. Still the building pad should be located away from the southwest corner as it still appears quite wet. 2. Special Privilege Because of the problems associated with drainage and topography, the requested variances, should it be granted, would not result in a grant of special privileges. 3. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the subject property as low density residential. The variance, should it be approved, will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Zoning Ordinance The subject property, as well as the properties to the north, west, and east is zoned RS-6. 5. Not Detrimental The variance should not be significantly detrimental to any nearby private property or improvements, nor to the public health, safety or general welfare. 6. Minimum Variance The variance appears to be the minimum to allow reasonable use of the property. V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the staff that V-7-82 be approved, building height not to exceed elevation 259. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF 08SH|NCTOH } ` ' > ss. COUNTY OF SNOH0N|3H ) ' Duane Bowman being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: "�~�, � That on the ay o 1x�/��� the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applic- able, on or near the subject property. ^^ + . S(g n e d Notory PubiIc — — and � Nashlngfon re�yd|nQ Ko Ilk 1161, Tiol i i A I THE NEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, MAY 24, 1982 , ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.. v-7-82 VARIANCE OF 3' FROM REQUIRED 25' HEIGHT LIMIT PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION IJ.31 "B" AVENUE ZONE DISTRICT RS-6 THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT 7 : 30 P .M. , IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 250 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH. IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK. YOU MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE ABOVE FILE NUMBER. IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED ONLY AT THE MEETING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 505 BELL STREET, EDMONDS (PHONE 775.2525, EXT. 227). THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR CONCEALMENT OF NOTICE BEFORE T DATE WARNING! OF THE HEARING IS AIMSDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER 5-24782 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER + EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 HEARING EXAMINER HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 'REQ91YED IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JUN� ��82 DENNIS OFTEDAHL FOR APPROVAL OF A Cry OF £�(y�p�S € �•. VARIANCE The abo Department of the City of Edmon specific captioned matter was applied through the Planning Edmonds. The s ecific appli,catian was �. ) feet from the required twenty-five (25) for a variance of three (3 feet height limit at 1131 B Avenue, Edmonds, Washington. A public hearing was held on the request on May 24, 1982. Subsequent to the #: f the variance. Hearing the applicant withdrew his request or The withdrawl was made prior to any decision on the request being made by the Hearing Examiner. THEREFORE, IT ISiHEREBY ORDERED that the variance request of (. Dennis Oftedahl is hereby withdrawn and no decision will be rendered in the matter. Further, the applicant will be required to meet all stars- dar.ds;':a as set forth in the Edmonds Community Development Code,for construction at 1131 B Avenue, Edmonds, Washington. 'DONE AND DATED THIS `) DAY CLF JUNE, 1982. James M. D hscoll Hearing aminer JMD/sh' +I