Loading...
1142 VISTA PLACE.PDF1142 VISTA PLACE STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET OWNER �P C r'tCALC BY: !O - L �O� P I •S `/ Y� ��D �O ADDRESS PHONE: lc- DATE: *****DESIGN DATA***** IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE z/qa C) _ 0 DETENTION PIPE LENGTH LOCKING LID FINISHED G MINIMUM Pit TIGHT 1 EE MEASIUREDEfROMCTOP OF CONC BOX OR RISER .5% TO 1% SLOPE 0 OUTLET OUTLET CONTROL R�c tr, FFMIN• G L t) UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE SEP' •2 CONTROL CATCH BASIN DEVELOPMT Wo cty-yev ME Nss CTR. SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EQUAL FROM CONTROL CB 2'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK EXt in.sFROM CONTROL OUTLETOCKRENCH MIN 10' LONG. PIPE TO HE LEVEL P[PE W/ END CAPS CH SHALL HE LINED WITH M1RAF1 PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF WASHED DRAIN ROCK RIPRAP OUTLET RUNOFF SPREADER. TRENCH ....................... FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED 719 DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection K APPROVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the G G�aoo `7 responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed DATE out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice. must be kept open at all times. L•� Table 1 — Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Area Sq. Ft. Vol Cu Ft 2000 50 2500 62 3000 75 3500 87 4000 100 4500 112 5000 125 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: Pipe Diameter 15" 18" 24" 30" 40 28 16 10 50 35 20 13 60 42 24 15 Required pipe 70 49 28 18 length in feet 80 56 32 21 90 63 36 23 100 70 40 25 Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Aluminum CMP Asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not permitted on roads) :., Table 2 — Outlet Orifice Sizes Imperfr6able- Area Sq. ' R.' F2000 ' . 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Outlet Orifice Diameter (Inches) 5/8 5/8 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 7/8 Table 3 — Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements Detention Max. size Catch Basin pipe diameter knockout Type < 18" 20" Type I, CB 15 18" to 24" 26" Type IL, CB 16 24" to 36" 36" Type ll, CB 19 19 (48" Basin) 36".to 42" 42" Type II, CB 19 19 (54" Basin) *Source: Assoc. Sand & Gravel Co. Standards 5 Revised 3/16/95 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. October 16, 2000 Pacific Emerald Homes P.O. Box 822 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Sigve Helleren Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation and Proposed New Residence 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Geotechnical / Civil Engineer nor-..� p % €-7 v. DEVELOPMENT K' ` I CJ C:YR CITY OF EDMONDS Foundation Recommendations Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Vicinity Map • Lot survey map with topography and layout of proposed new residence • New house plans • Photographs BACKGROUND: The property at 1142 Vista Place contains an existing residence (one level with daylight basement) that is estimated to be approximately 35 to 45 years old. It is understood that Pacific Emerald Homes proposes to. demolish the existing residence, and construct a new one in approximately the same footprint location (see plans). The overall property is approximately one hundred fifty-five foot (155') wide (in the north -south direction), and approximately two hundred forty (240') deep. The existing residence occupies a relatively flatter portion of the overall lot. Both the eastern portion and southwestern portion of the property contain slopes exceeding fifty percent (50%). Visual evaluation of the existing residence revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No settlements, no foundation cracking, no sloughing, or any SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 Pacific Emerald Homes Page two significant erosional degradation. Additionally, visual evaluation of the overall property revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress. The natural drainage pattern follows the topography down hill to the southwest. The property adjacent (southerly) to this property is a heavily vegetated drainage swale / forested greenbelt zone (see photos). The existing residence is approximately fifteen to eighteen feet (15' - 18') setback from the top -of -slope to the south. It is understood that the new residence will be in the same alignment and setback distance as the existing residence with regard to the southerly top -of -slope. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug under this engineer's observation on October 10, 2000, using a rubber -tired . backhoe (see photographs). A total of two soil test pits were dug. Test Pit No. 1 was dug approximately fifteen feet (15') off the northwest corner of the existing residence. Test Pit No. 2 was dug approximately twelve feet (12') off the southwest corner of the existing residence. Both Test Pit No. 1 and No. 2 revealed similar subgrade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Lawn, organics, roots, and organic silt 6" to approx. 14" Brown reddish -brown sandy loam, grading to sandy silt 14" to approx. 34" Increasingly dense sandy silt with occasional gravels 34" to approx. 8' (bottom of pit) Dense to very dense weathered glacial till (hardpan) grading to glacial till No water was encountered in either of the two test pits. Both test pit walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically approved for the proposed new (replacement) single family residence, subject 'to the following: • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. Pacific Emerald Homes Page three • Setback from top -of -slope: This engineer to verify setback distance from new foundation to top -of -slope. It is understood that the setback distance will be greater than twelve feet (12'). A setback of less than twelve feet may be geotechnically acceptable with specialized foundation designs. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We Pacific Emerald Homes Page four recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c,f. Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page five Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Pacific Emerald Homes Page six recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the test pits during the field work. Seepage. into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page seven adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page eight If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing residence and property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds. Currently, the existing residence controls its impervious storm water by means of gutter and downspout and tightline release into the natural drainage swale to the southwest. It is understood that the new residence will control drainage in a similar fashion. Compliance with standard storm water detention methods in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements is geotechnically acceptable. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. INSPECTION: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page nine • Soil cuts • Setback distance verification from top -of -slope • Foundation subgrade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The proposed new single family residence at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspection during construction. FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS: Prior to permit issuance, geotechnical review of final project plans is required. The purpose of this final review is to verify compatibility with the understood nature of the project and the geotechnical conditions, as well as have an opportunity to make final recommendations for any design changes incurred prior to construction.' CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. s S M• 4 �604"`"811 G Oo 17405 0 O �°c�srea0 DMB:vIbSfONALE�G1 e RRES 12R31 ROOM M Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer SEP-24-2000 20:53 CHICAGO TITLE BARB F. 425 259 8243 P.11/11 .21 v t a 0' U _ s� a 1444&35 frodw Lea Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR a JOHN 4. NF•ISON, ttnd VICTC.RIA NFISON, bin wife C" I CM 0e1 this day personally Y fli k Y a Ppearrd before mr John A. Nelson and Victoria ltelson, hia wife. to the known to be the indiv;duai dexribed in mod who executed the within and foreaoinr inAzUtnent, and acknowle tted that they sianed the am as their area and voluntary �',t• 'Purposes therein mentioned, h' Oct and deed, for thm GIVE\ under my band and aMcial semi this 4th day of Kay► 1956 t•til� 4j� N48-Y Padrie hs and Jor sko State of Wait s —. o+, fir• .. `� , r�etidlwr tl F.dIDatDds. U for and In ennaideration of Ten Dollars (t10.D0) and other good and valuable connidorat:onv In hand pald, mnveyt and warrants to RAY! 0ND R. P8ACE2, and THORA J. PF.ACEX ,his wits the fallowinc describer; real r•tate• eftuated in the CnuntY c,1 5rc: oaieh ti4'ashini{tOn: The North 165 feat of Tract 22 , ; 3tre at Tracts, aecording to the recorded plat�th`I ,ore ordshofe aidocouatY,eIFSSethi West 360 feet thereof. RMtRVTNOi unto aellera, their heirs, suecw3 aore, and/or assigns a Aon—exclusive tasetnant for road and utility ptmposoe, and the maintenance and repair of same, over, aerass, &ad upoa the Vest 20 feet and the South 10 feet of the above described property. GRAM'INC tie purchasers, their heirs, sucaeesorsr and/or assigns, an eeeement for toad and utility p=posee, and the maintan4nas and 'repair of same, over, acro' and upon the Vorth 10 fast of the oast 400 fast of Tract 22, Puget Sound vy_hinerr Depot Five Acre Tracts. TOGETHM vith an eaee«ent for rand and utility purposes, and the maiatenaacs and rspair of same, over, dc;,sa, and upon the South 10 fenL of the Lest 400 feet of Tract, 21, Fltget Sound Kachinory Depot 8iv Aere Tracts, according to the recorded Plat tht7to-f—prec-ards of said county. 1% Real Estate Sales Tax paid Novamter ;, 1953 per Receipt No. 75573, reccrds Of Snoholydsh County, Washjr%gton. SIA ss wasunor�ie u:suno�nn Dated this 4th7�,V• ;L LJ7-�iZ :1LE3 t °f X&7t 1956 ., t:,vt=LINT P.;l]._ Q0 p �G�• Es ; U i2u1 STATE OF u'.1Sttl`GTb\''; r om County et'Snahish t r City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Mark Dreyer Determination #: CA-2000-105 Project Name: Plan Check #00-397 Permit Number: Site Location: 1142 Vista Place Property Tax Acct #: 5489 000 022 03 Project Description New Single Family Residence Determination: Conditional Waiver: Application to construct a new single family residence at 1142 Vista Place was submitted September 12, 2000. The original critical areas determination, issued July 13, 2000, indicates that a study is required. The site is adjacent to property along Sierra Place where known wetlands are located. Upon further visit to the site at 1142 Vista Place, it appears that in fact a stream exists, near and or on the property. If the stream is a Class 2 stream, the Edmonds Community Development Code requires that development be 40 feet from the stream. This includes a 25-foot stream buffer and a 15-foot building setback. It appear that the proposal is more that 65-feet from the stream. As a result, the proposed single family house does not appear to impact the stream. Further study by a wetland biologist will not be required for the proposed building permit provided that the following conditions are met: 1. A Native Growth Protection Area Easement (NGPAE) must be established on the lot. It must include the easternmost 40 feet of the site. 2. The NGPAE must be recorded with Snohomish County. A copy of the recorded document must be provided to the City of Edmonds Planning & Development Services Department. 3. The NGPAE must be indicated on the plot plan. 4. No development will be allowed to occur within the NGPAE until which time a critical areas study is completed. Based on the study findings, the NGPAE may be revised or removed accordingly. Changes to the NGPAE must also be recorded with Snohomish County. This conditional waiver is specific to the single family house building permit submitted September 12, 2000. Any future development proposals must be individually reviewed to determine whether a critical area study is required. The following criteria was used in making the determination per ECDC Section 20.15B.140(A)(2): 1. There will be no alteration of the critical area or its buffer. 2. The development proposal will not impact the critical areas in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of this chapter. 3. The development proposal meets the minimum standards of this chapter. Kathleen Taylor I�FLOXOOOO November 21, 2000 Name Signature Date October 15, 2013 To Whom It May Concern, STREET FILE We are writing regarding stormwater damage to our property due to an undersized City storm drain pipe which is failing. We believe the city bears responsibility for the repair and maintenance of this pipe and storm drain easement, as we will describe here. Briefly, in the early 1960's, Gordon Henrikson wished to develop what was then called Maplewood Village No. 1, on 12th Avenue. He obtained an easement from the Nelsons, owners of the property below his development, "...for the installation, operation and maintenance of a storm drain over, across, through and below the following described property, ..." Please see attached this document, AF#1495750, which describes our property and the easement (currently noted on City maps.) Then in January of 1992 Mr. Henrikson relinquished the easement and granted it to the City of Edmonds, "... in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from the maintenance of said easement by the City of Edmonds for and on behalf of the public..." Please see the attached document, AF#9204160429. We believe this contract binds the City to the continued maintenance of this easement. We have appreciated the maintenance performed to date. This culvert is on the routine surveillance list and has been cleared by the Vactor crews approximately 8 times over the past 5-6 years, including 3 times in the last 2 months. However, due to the recent spate of high water events, more damage has occurred in the past 3 months and further maintenance is required. Last Wednesday, October 91h, we invited the City and a DFW biologist, Jamie Bails, to review the recent damage. Jennifer Lambert, Jen Machuga, Mike Johnson and others were kind enough to tour the easement, including 2 sections of the storm pipe that have failed due to erosion and surcharging of this undersized 12 inch pipe. Previously, the City acknowledged the shortcomings of this drainage system. "This stream receives stormwater runoff from an area of at least 16 acres, encompassing 40+ lots and City right -of way that were developed largely before stormwater management was required." Please see this attached document from the City of Edmonds from April of 2013, written during the hearing process concerning the previous owners' wish to build a home on this land. The undersized nature of this pipe and the lower culvert have since been confirmed independently by 2 civil engineers, a senior project ecologist and the State biologist with whom we have consulted. Substantial downstream damage is a direct result of the erosion and deterioration of the watercourse due to this failed pipe and is threatening our properties downstream. You can get further details of the serious nature of this damage from your City staff who were present. We appreciate the City accepting responsibility for repairing the damage from this storm pipe and look forward to speaking with you about how we might collaborate. Please let us know when we can meet to. discuss this further. Sincerely, teve Schroeder, ii4.7_ Vista Place 425-712-8694 Todd Brown, 1135 Sierra Place 425-672-4418 N EASEMENT FOR a good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledg4 N the undersigned, JOHN A. NELSON and NE LSON, his wife, hei by grant to GORDON HENRICIMON, a married man, for the exclusive benefit and purl of draining the plat of MAPLEWOOD VILLAGE NO. 1, an easement for storm drainag .y ten (10) feet in width, 'extending five (5) feet on either aide of the following described centerline, for the installation, operation and maintenance of a storm drain over, acre through, and below the following described property, located in the County. of Snohomssl State of Washington, to -wit: I M kn Beginning at the northeast -corner of Tract twenty-three (23), PUGET SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT FIVE ACRE TRACTS, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 5 of plats, page 47, records of Snohomish County, Washington; thence north 89034128" west,' 180.17 feet along the north line of said tract 23 to the true point- of beginning; thence south 76042155" west, 63.29.feet;thence north 89034128" west, parallel to the north line of said tract 23, 175.00 feet; thence south 0010130" west, parallel to the west line of said tract 23, 105.00 feet to a point on the south line of the north 120.00 feet of said tract 23, south 8903418" east, 203. 00 feet from the southwest corner of the north 120.00 feet of said tract 23, and the terminus of said asement; . GRANTORS reserve the right to relocate the said case- ment to conform to let lines in the event of a future subdivision. DATED this- day of October, 1961. STATE OF WAS ;NGTON ) T,SON;. hi J es •• "day personally appeared before me JOHN A. NELSON and a'jvi e, to me known to be the individuals described in and who execut ^ _ td:te=egoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same ,as ki•vdluntary act and deed, for the uses and Purposes the •in me coned. �I folder my hand and official seal this�day of �� 1961, J1, 9 �= _ Notary lic is and fort State of~ zj Washington, residing at Filed for Raw a NOV 15 1961' IV AM - pr — 1 I Request R `EQ U i` E D 0. E Neub+ecker, Snohomish County Audttw N o Y 15 i s,; Dews '-1.L VOL 105 Paaf 35 =, V RECEIVED CITY C N En �� JAN 1 5 1992 EDuofl06, WA 9802O ENGINEERING tl��" " RELINQUXSHHENT OF BASCMERT WHEREAS, Gordon Ilenrickeon, was granted an oemement for storm drainage pursuant to a document recorded as document number 1495750, records of Snohomish County, from John A. Nelson and Victoria Nelson for the purpose of draining the plat of Maplewood Village No. 11 WHEREAS, an storm drainage easement has been dedicated to the City of Edmonds for the purpose of establishing a public drainage way in liou of the previously astablishad private 006919e11t: and WHEREAS, the previously granted easement has become C'13 superfluous to the needs of the public or, to Gordon Henrickoon, or to the residence of Maplewood Village No. 1: ,d1 NOW, THEREFORE, Gordon Henricksen, a married man, in ) consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from the :• 1 { ' maintenance of said easement by the City of Edmonds for and on behalf of the public does hereby: I. Qtilt Claim and Transfer of Ex sting Rights. The Grantor hereby dedicates to public use and to the City of Edmonds, Ifashington, on behalf of said public, a storm drainage easement described as 10 feet in width extending 5 feet on either side of the following described oentor line: Beginning at the northeast corner of Tract twenty-three (24), PUOFT SOUND MACHINERY DEPOT FIVE ACRE TRACTS, according to the plat Q thereof recorded in volume 5 of plats, page )z 47, records of Snohomish County, Washington: C W thence north 89'1442811 west, 180.17 feet along tU X > the north line of said tract 27 to the true N of beginning: , point thence south 761421359 CU wont, 63.29 feet: thence north 89-3412811 west, k d ~ parallel to the north line of said tract 23, O �W- � 7OQ 175.00 feat: thence south 0*1012011 west, Z ►3 -1- IetW477. U4ppel. Ip.p1 12 2581IrAr>E1522 parallel to the west lino of said tract 23, 105.00 foot to a point on the south line of the north 120.00 feet Of said tract 23, south 89.34129" east, 205.00 feet from the southwest corner of the north 120.00 feat of said tract 23, and the terminus or said easement. f. fi2XA2n_Xr,9j, The above -described cosecant and the relinquished easement described in paragraph 3 both burden a tract described as Tract 23 of the Puget Sound Machinery Depot Five Acre Tracts according to a plot thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plata, page 47 of the records cf Snohomish, Washington. 3. Waiver end Rolincuishaent o! Rim Eroept as necessary to support the dedication described in paragraph 1, Cordon Henrickson hereby waives, relinquishos and roloa,ses the easement originally granted purouent to a document recorded under document number 1495750 of the records Snohomish County, Washington. DATED this J_L'�day of 1992, 0 1 0) ordon Hen keon ACCEPTBO BY CITY Or EOMONpBt Byl S test: u .. to Mayor c ' R nda J. March, C ty Clark Approved as to forms o. OGUE 11T>atP YAA1. CE v �/ aL V W. Scott any C ty Attorney i tii• '' a -2- vs: t■iooa, t2o.vot va.256OPME1523 STATE OFWASNINOTON i COUNTY OF -Kiuii 1 On tills day petsooully appwmd before me Gordon llenrbkson imlivlJusldesctfbcJlnanJwhoeseculudthewithin'Intlfor.Quinrin+ttumcnt maJnctnowktilyedIQ thoebdsfesiped the saac w 1110 of rtce and volmulaty act mild deed, fur the uses and parpino IMcrrin manlloned. t-,pZDF,N,q�derroYhandand0mcial:callhls.Utb `Jay January 19 92. � �• Notoryl,uh nil fntth 9tmte it t c of Washlnpino. residing of 0 t My commission azpims:. lk��o'�l - �Y rot. 256 opAcE 1524 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 - Fax: 425.771.0221 - Web: www.edmondswa.aov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION "?C. 199� April 23, 2013 Mr. Phil Olbrechts Hearing Examiner Sent via email SUBJECT. Response to Comments on Order on Reconsideration Hillman Variances - File No. PLN20120033 Dear Mr. Olbrechts, The Hearing Examiner's Order on Reconsideration issued on April 16, 2013 regarding Tom and Lin Hillman's variance application (File No. PLN20120033) allowed for all parties of record to submit written comments by 5:00 p.m. on April 22, 2013. Comments were received from five parties and were sent to the Hearing Examiner via email on April 22, 2013. The comments sent to the Hearing Examiner include the following: Letter from Todd Brown, received 4/19/13 Email from David Thorpe, received 4/21/13 Letter from Cheri Zehner, received via email 4/21/13 Letter from Alvin Rutledge, received 4/22/13 Letter from Tom and Lin Hillman, received 4/22/13 As allowed for by the Hearing Examiner's Order on Reconsideration, the City and applicant may respond to the above comments by 5:00 p.m. on April 23, 2013. In response to the comments raised, the City would like to offer the following. With regards to stormwater flows at the subject site, the City has relied on the statements and documentation of a licensed professional Wetland Ecologist. As provided in Attachment 8 of the City's Report and Recommendations to the Hearing Examiner dated March 7, 2013, the Wetland Ecologist has indicated that stormwater from the subject site flows to the northwest culvert. It is the applicants responsibility to show compliance with stormwater codes with a city -prescribed design that attempts to match the post -development stormwater runoff rates with the pre -development stormwater runoff rates from the property up to the 10-year, 24-hour storm event only. As stated by the Wetland Ecologist and the neighbors, during heavy rain events the stream may overflow along the west property line and outfall via the southwest culvert. As the culvert is only used as an overflow outlet in both pre and post development conditions, there is no approval needed by the owners of I I I I Sierra Pl. City Engineering staff wishes to reiterate that monitoring of the proposed site stormwater management system to verify that it fully prevents any increase in stormwater discharges to 0023 neighboring properties is problematic. Flow onto the Hillman property in part comes from the City's storm system that discharges into the stream. This stream receives stormwater runoff from an area of at least 16 acres, encompassing 40+ lots and City right-of-way that were developed largely before stormwater management was required. In addition, the site is also subject to groundwater seepage from the surrounding upstream area and surface runoff from adjacent parcels, which may influence the surface water flows that come off the Hillman property. In closing, Planning and Engineering Division staff confirms its position made in the City's April 8, 2013 request for reconsideration and respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider/clarify the findings and conclusions of the decision on the Hillman variance request in addition to Conditions #1 and #2 and add clarification of the City's appeal procedures. Sincerely, Jennifer Machuga Jennifer Lambert Associate Planner Engineering Technician Page 2 of 2 0024 i FILENovember 19, 2013REET To: Jennifer Lampert, Rob English, Jerry Schuster, Phil Williams From: Todd Brown, Steve Schroeder Re: Sierra Place Meeting Summary Attached please find the executive summary of the meeting we had on November 15th, 2013. In it we summarize the mutual agreements and commitments as we understand them. If you would like to make any changes please let me know by November 25th, the day prior to our site visit with Jamie Bails and Bob Bernard from WDFW. Otherwise we'll assume you concur with the points in this summary. We're appreciative of your time and efforts in this matter and are very optimistic as we move forward together to resolve these drainage problems. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sierra Place Storm Drainage Meeting, 11/15/13 Present: Phil Williams Steve Schroeder Rob English Todd Brown (also representing Barry Hachler) Jerry Schuster Bill Lider Jennifer Lambert The above representatives of the City and the Sierra Place properties met to discuss the storm water erosion problems at 1142 Vista Place (Schroeder), 1135 and 1139 Sierra Place (Brown) and 1111 Sierra Place (Hachler). There was mutual agreement on the following: 1. The causes of the problem — a failing 12 inch circa 1962 concrete tile storm pipe from 12tn Ave., unable to convey high stormwater flow, is eroding back into the hill. The high pressure flow during high storm water flows is scouring the bed and incising the stream bank, moving sediment downstream, occasionally obstructing the downstream 12 inch culvert and requiring maintenance by the city's Vactor crews. This sediment is also being deposited on the 1111 Sierra property, changing the direction of stream flow and endangering the home on the property. 2. The legal definitions of the various easements — the uppermost easement (Maplewood Village #1) is an easement managed by the City. The pipe outfall section is a private easement on 1142 Vista Place property, for which the city has acknowledged responsibility. The middle and lower portions are a public maintenance easement assigned to the City in 1992. It was noted that the lower storm drain easement did not accurately describe the location of the 12 inch culvert and portions of the stream within the lower easement. While the main body of the 12 inch culvert is within this easement, the entrance to this culvert is outside the easement. The general nature of the needed repairs — restore the 2 failed pipe sections and install an energy dissipation system at the outfall; slow the stream flow with log check dams (shown on the Lider Engineering preliminary drawing dated 11/14/13, distributed at the meeting) to reduce bank incising and sediment flow; shore up the bank in several locations in the middle stream section; and, further evaluate what repairs are needed in the lower section to protect the house on 1111 Sierra Place. Upsizing the storm drains is not a viable option. The following commitments were made: 1. The City will video inspect the storm drainpipe from Maplewood Village #1, then perform and fund the necessary repairs to the upper pipe outfall and construct an energy dissipater on the Schroeder property at 1142 Vista Place. 2. Steve Schroeder will grant a temporary construction access easement to the City on 1142 Vista for necessary supplies and equipment needed for said repairs with steps taken to mitigate damage to the property. 3. The property owners and the City will serve as co -applicants for any necessary SEPA or HPA permits. 4. Jerry Schuster will explore the option of performing the necessary outflow pipe repairs under the City's maintenance HPA agreement. r� v S. The City will pursue transferring the storm drain easement on 1142 Vista to the City. 6. The City will send delegates to meet on -site with the WDFW biologist and engineer on November 26 at 10:00 AM. 7. The property owners will obtain competitive bids for the repair work on the middle and lower sections and engage a company to perform the repairs. The property owners and City will equally split the cost of repairs to the middle and lower section if the total cost is equal to or less than $10,000. If the cost is higher, further negotiations will occur. �IYI�'lll'uIIIIIIVmNI111MIIIIIgNU Return Address: City Clerk City of Edmonds 1215mAvenue N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 RHINGTON . 0 �5 NO EXCISE TAX REQUIRED FEB 14 2014 KIRKE SIEVERS, snoeomish County Treasurer By, KIRKE SIEVERS STORM DRAINAGE E ENT TRANSF R ND ACCE kMENAENT GRANT AGREEMENT 1"eEOr - o G � X 1 I b f pales Gra tors: Stephen C. Schroeder and Cheryl Beighle, [property owners] a , J Grantee: City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation Property Address: 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington 98020 Abbreviated Legal Description: PUGET SOUND MCHY DEP OT 5 AC TRS BLK 000 D-03 - THE N 155FT OF S165FT OFE 240FT OF TR 22 AKA PAR A CITY EDM BLA REC AF 930708052 Assessor's Property Tax Parcel No: 00548900002203 THIS STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT TRANSFER AND ACCESS EASEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement') is made and entered into on the date set forth below by and between Stephen C. Schroeder and Cheryl Beighle, [property owners] ("Grantors"), and the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation ("Grantee") (collectively "the Parties") with regard to the following: RECITALS A. Grantors are the fee owners of the real property described above, which property is burdened by a permanent storm drainage easement, dated November 15, 1961 and having Snohomish County Auditor Recording No. 1495751, in favor of the property's prior owner, Gordon Henrickson ("Storm Drainage Easement'). B. Grantors desire to transfer ownership of the Easement to Grantee, and additionally to grant an access easement ("Access Easement') to Grantee to facilitate access to the storm drainage facilities located on the subject property. The Storm Drainage Easement is as legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein in full by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits to accrue to the Grantors herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Transfer of Storm Drainage Easement Grantors hereby transfer and convey to Grantee all right, title and interest of every nature held by Grantors, their successors and assigns arising under or accruing as a result of the Storm Drainage Easement, having Snohomish County Auditor Recording No. 1495751. The transfer of the Storm Drainage Easement shall be effective upon recording of this Agreement with the real property records of Snohomish County. 2. Grant of Access Easement Grantors hereby grant and convey to Grantee an easement for ingress and egress over and across Grantors' property, for the below stated purposes, to the storm drainage system and appurtenances located on the south side of the single family residence by way of foot access around the east end of said residence. The easement shall provide access to and operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the storm drainage facilities located within the Storm Drainage Easement herein described. When it is necessary for Grantee to utilize the Access Easement for said purposes, Grantee agrees to perform any such activity in a workmanlike manner with all reasonable haste, and to restore the property to substantially its previous condition as soon as reasonably possible, with the costs of such activity and/or restoration being borne by Grantee. The Access Easement shall be a covenant running with the Grantors' land and shall be binding upon the parties thereto, their heirs, successors and assigns forever. NO EXCISE TAX REQUIRED Page 1 of 2 . FEB 2 0 2014 KIRKE SIEVERS, Snohomish County Treasurer By KIRKE SIEVERS 3. Warranty of Authority Grantors warrant that Grantors own fee title to the real property described herein and warrant Grantee title to and quiet enjoyment of the Storm Drainage Easement and the Access Easement. The Parties warrant that the individuals executing this Agreement on behalf of the respective Parties are duly authorized by such Party to execute this Agreement. 4. Recording Upon its execution by the Parties, this Agreement, including the Exhibits A & B describing and depicting the Storm Drainage Easement and the Access Easement, shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor's Office. s22 . DATED THIS � DAY OF �Q 40' 1=141�'�lrf G NTORS: Step en C. Schroeder Cheryl Beighle G TEE, CITY E M N ve Earling, Mayor , ATHEN TTES7N TED' assey, City erk APPROVED AS TO FORM: (QfWe of the City Attorney — STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stephen C. Schroeder and Cheryl Beighle, [property owners], are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument, and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 11 a O/4-1-y`'e Dated: :2032 Notary Public in and for th State of /� Washington, residing at My appointment expires Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A ., %"MA9EHENT yolt a good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigocd, jMtefiNG V. KZLSON and JOY NELSON. his wife, hereby grad to GORDON HENR1CKSON, a married man, for the exclusive benefit and purpoe* of drain' 7 Log the plat of KAPLE WOOD VIU AGE NO.'1. 'sn easement for storm drainage, ten (10) feet In width, extending five (3) feet on either side of the following described cerderllne, for the iastailslion, operation and maLdenance of a storm drain over, across, through and below the following described property, located to the County of Snohomish, State h x o! WasWVM. to -wit: Beginning al the southeast career of Tract twenty-two (22), PUGET 9OVND IdACEaNERY DEPOT FIVE ACRE TRACTS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Tatum* 5 of plate, pa%e 41. records of Adohomish County, Washfttatm thence north 0 10155" crest, as. go test along the east line of said Tract 22 to the true point of begloaltgl thence south 68*10,20" west 145.29 feet: thence south T6042165" west. 48.37 feet to a point 02 the south Una of sold Tract 22, north 80034-28" west. I80.17 feet from the southeast earner thereat, and the terminus of said easement. MANZVRS reserve the right to relocate the said easo- meal to cordorm to lot limes in the even of a future subdivision. DATED this �,Odar of October, 1981. BrATS or w N 1 CCAtat3'Y taF 7 )es e'Q ramall appeared before me l3TMZMM V. NEl�ON end JOY t y fe, to me !mown to be the individuals described In gad who execded 6A4COrqg*WS inatrumeat; and acknowledged that they signed the same as #luzduT act and dead. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. �+s �� • War tnly hard and official seal this /•&dday of _� . 1061. cm% Nd Pa c im cod for tto f 0— o kiln at '„ 4 _ . ]Washington, tt�N i� 4 y 01TA 41 c y :f �\ - ' �47 C� ua % -ANGL.E.'.P ' 17. 5 FT�,* V BwtE . - MI. THE 24 - 0: Fes : v 0-:79ACT C5, E F"E"' (Ao AS M NT F-i EXHIBIT B dtti� N -FERCE RdT-E-ClION AINA t 4- IL ._,E ''!' :iR ACF.i 'EA -M N A 14 a " . ... - I L4-0.3010' IOU, 44 .. "�:y.n•.i-:'4+u�wie„J'b1il�"i%",w.Srr ••u.yY"'.,gip... •" ., ^°4f.v ',jz V_1u'-!„Y�i..n,n1,..+•vv rri�r'G\J"";-�."t•^^..,.. d;,f�4 i;:r *xtt'�4yinA'n • "PERMIT NO: City of Edmonds .n� ,gy� 12.1131,1 SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT EXPIRES Address of Construction: .dtu_ .. LID # Property Tax Account Parcel No.. (3�) _C\ Attach copies of all access. 7ZA�c_ ity easements' Verified and Approved bOwner and/or Contractor: �n�e r-a►1 > m�� ,w�a;�. Contractor License #: Single Family ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ❑ Commercial (No. of Units ) ❑ Public uilding Permit #:a0cc, Invasion into City *Right -of Way: ❑ Yes YNO *RW Construction Permit # Cross other **Private Property: ❑ Yes �No r , **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. Owner oil contractor signature and acknowledgement statement: By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled •Side Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-425-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION 9 W FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extension 329 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS 92 Dat z I2 7777727772 1 142 VISTA PL C/o 1.5' 5.5' C/o h VISTA PL az 18 5' v 1142 W a. VISTA PL o EXISTING BURIED C/o 5' DEEP SIERRA PL SEWER MAI c/o 6' TO CpRheR neighbors neighbors house house E�oi- CITY OF EDMONDS ,SIDE SEWER AS— BUILT ADDRESSi SCALE 1142 VISTA PL NTS HOMEOWNER: CONTRACTOR: PAC, EMERALD HOMES INC, DATE: DRAWN PERMIT fit. 1890 12/13/01 BY: I, ABILA NO. 9419 M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. February 1, 2001 Geotechnical/Civil Engineer BUIOJ Vo FEB 12 i City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 Subject: Geotechnical Inspections AMR Vista Place, Edmonds New Single Family Residence This engineering report presents the results of on -site geotechnical inspections for the new single family residence at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington. • City of Edmonds approved project plans • Geotechnical evaluation report by D. Bruce, P.E., dated October 16, 2000 • Photographs This engineer has provided on -site inspections with regard to geotechnical aspects of the Pacific Emerald Homes project at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington. • Soil Cuts / Slope Stability: Project contractor successfully demolished and removed the preexisting residence. Excavation cuts encountered dense, native subgrade soils, as anticipated by this engineer's geotechnical report. Excavation cuts varied in depth from approximately two feet (2') to approximately six feet (6). Slope cuts remained stable in the dense, native subgrade soils. No sloughing, no caving, nor erosional degradation has occurred. Slope cuts stable as of January 30, 2001. • Setback Distance from Top of SigM. Excavation cuts complied with the recommendations of this engineer's geotechnical report. The setback distance from the adjacent top -of -slope meets / exceeds geotechnical recommendations. Setback distance is aeotechnically apremoved. (Note: City of Edmonds inspectors verified setback distance from property lines.) SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 Re: Geotechnical Inspections - 1142 Vista Place_, Edmonds February 1, 2001 Page two Foundation Subgrade: As anticipated, the excavation encountered dense, native subgrade soils capable of meeting / exceeding 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. "O.K." to proceed with foundation formwork, reinforcing steel placement, and foundation footing concrete placement in accordance with City of Edmonds approved plans and City of Edmonds inspection. • Fill Placement: Not yet occurred -- none anticipated. • Subsurface Drainage Installation: Not yet occurred. • Final Grading: Not yet occurred. • All special geotechnical inspection aspects have been properly completed to date. "O. K." to proceed with foundation concrete in accordance with approved plans and City of Edmonds inspections. • This engineer to continue to provide on -site geotechnical inspections and monitoring. Additional inspection reports forthcoming. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. )r DMB:vIb cc: Pacific Emerald Homes Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. FILEr October 16, 2000 Pacific Emerald Homes THEET P.O. Box 822 S Edmonds, Washington 98020 FILE Geotechnical/Civil Engineer OCT 23 2"U00 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDs Attn: Mr. Sigve Helleren Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation and Foundation Recommendations iroposed New Residence Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds; Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / developer concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Vicinity Map • Lot survey map with topography and layout of proposed new residence • New house plans • Photographs BACKGROUND: The property at 1142 Vista Place contains an existing residence (one level with daylight basement) that is estimated to be approximately 35 to 45 years old. It is understood that Pacific Emerald Homes proposes to demolish the existing residence, and construct a new one in approximately the same footprint location (see plans). The overall property is approximately one hundred fifty-five foot (155) wide (in the north -south direction), and approximately two hundred forty (240') deep. The existing residence occupies a relatively flatter portion of the overall lot. Both the eastern portion and southwestern portion of the property contain slopes exceeding fifty percent (50%). Visual evaluation of the existing residence revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No settlements, no foundation cracking, no sloughing, or any SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 Pacific Emerald Homes Page two significant erosional degradation. Additionally, visual evaluation of the overall property revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress. The natural drainage pattern follows the topography down hill to the southwest. The property adjacent (southerly) to this property is a heavily vegetated drainage swale / forested greenbelt zone (see photos). The existing residence is approximately fifteen to eighteen feet (15' - 18') setback from the top -of -slope to the south. It is understood that the new residence will be in the same alignment and setback distance as the existing residence with regard to the southerly top -of -slope. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug under this engineer's observation on October 10, 2000, using a rubber -tired backhoe (see photographs). A total of two soil test pits were dug. Test Pit No. 1 was dug approximately fifteen feet (15') off the northwest corner of the existing residence. Test Pit No. 2 was dug approximately twelve feet (12') off the southwest corner of the existing residence. Both Test Pit No. 1 and No. 2 revealed similar subgrade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Lawn, organics, roots, and organic silt 6" to approx. 14 Brown reddish -brown sandy loam, grading to sandy silt 14" to approx. 34" Increasingly dense sandy silt with occasional gravels 34" to approx. 8' (bottom of pit) Dense to very dense weathered glacial till (hardpan) grading to glacial till No water was encountered in either of the two test pits. Both test pit walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically approved for the proposed new (replacement) single family residence, subject to the following: • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. Pacific Emerald Homes Page three • Setback from top -of -slope: This engineer to verify setback distance from new foundation to top -of -slope. It is understood that the setback distance will be greater than twelve feet (12'). A setback of less than twelve feet may be geotechnically acceptable with specialized foundation designs. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We Pacific Emerald Homes Page four recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure ►Viy/iTM Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f. Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page five Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Pacific Emerald Homes Page six recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the test pits during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page seven adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page eight If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing residence and property at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds. Currently, the existing residence controls its impervious storm water by means of gutter and downspout and tightline release into the natural drainage swale to the southwest. It is understood that the new residence will control drainage in a similar fashion. Compliance with standard storm water detention methods in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements is geotechnically acceptable. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. INSPECTION: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: Pacific Emerald Homes Pacific Emerald Homes Page nine • Soil cuts • Setback distance verification from top -of -slope • Foundation subgrade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The proposed new single family residence at 1142 Vista Place, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspection during construction. FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS: Prior to permit issuance, geotechnical review of final project plans is required. The purpose of this final review is to verify compatibility with the understood nature of the project and the geotechnical conditions, as well as have an opportunity to make final recommendations for any design changes incurred prior to construction. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. DMB:vlb �1S M. 46 o o� Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. 1740a� �a Geotechnical / Civil Engineer EXPIRES 12MV ZO O / I Snow tie V ed 4 IIWO)t S. q&44UAa DATE: May 23, 2001 Hi Lyle, Thanks for the good conversation. RF p2D ENU,,.. � DIVISION RECEPLIEP MAY 14 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION ,5;f - V1sT*A- PL, -,.,-or your information, I sent the attached note to eleven neighbors who live on Vista lace and belong to our neighborhood watch group. .I look forward to your call as a result of inspector's site visit. 1/ai" 5, qGraiawa 7) 0 Fox 322 sda"W46, W14 99020 Paae (425) 774-4559' RECEIVED 5- , ?/&WaM@M,W, eOm MAY 2 4 2001 ENGINEERING DIVISION May 23, 2001 I1ear Vista Neighborhood neighbors, As you know, the new house construction above us meant at least one hundred heavy equipments, including army tank type, metal -tracked rigs have gone up and down our private road. All of us have watched with concern, the deterioration of Vista place road surfaces. .I .Have taken some amateur photos to document the deterioration, which occurred as the direct result of the construction activities. have spoken to Sigva Helleron, the general contractor who told file that the repair of the "apron area" adjoining Olympic Avenue is the responsibility of the City. By "apron", I mean that area which would be a part of the sidewalk, were it not for the access indentation to Vista Place. I contacted Lyle Chrisman, Edmonds City Engineer, at 771-0220. His email address is chrisman@ci.edmonds.wa.us. According to him, the damages caused by construction equipment are the responsibility of the contractor. I can positively say that the apron area was in very good shape before the beginning �,f the onstruction. Perhaps you agree. Lyle is to send out the city inspector to the site within a week. Lyle promised to call me after the inspection, and I will let you know what they ay. In the meantime, feel free to call me, or for that matter, call cr email Lyle ,�iith your thoughts and concerns. Your neighbor, Victor Hirakawa," 425-774-4558 CC:' Lyle Chrisman via email and US mail 11, City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Mark E. Dreyer Determination #: CA-2000-105 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 1142 Vista Place Property Tax Acct #: �5489-000-022-03 Project Description: non -project specific A site inspection of the property has revealed a lot developed with a single family residence. The site contains or is adjacent to wetlands and also appears to contain or is adjacent to slopes of 40% or greater with a vertical elevation change of more than 20 feet. Based on the above findings, it is determined that there is potentially a wetland critical area and steep slope critical area(s) on or adjacent to the site. A Critical Areas Study is required to delineate the boundaries of the potential critical areas, buffers and setbacks. A wetland biologist .must locate the wetland and identify the classification of the wetland; then a licensed land surveyor must create a map of the site which indicates the wetland. location and the buffer location. For steep slopes, a licensed surveyor must create a topographic map of the site that indicates all areas that slope 40% or more and have a vertical gain of 20 feet or more within the 40% slopes. The map must also show the location of the steep slope buffers and setbacks. Since the possible wetland and possible steep slopes may be located on adjacent property, the City understands that the owner of the subject property may not be able to gain legal access to that property. Adjacent property owners must grant permission to access, and the City is not implying consent to access an adjacent property. If applicant is unable to gain access to adjacent properties, the City will accept a surveyed map with the best estimate of the steep slope and wetand locations. For the purposes of determining the buffer location, the City will assume that the wetland is a Class 2, unless a report from a wetland biologist proves otherwise. Any work performed by a wetland biologist must be prepared through a three party contract with the applicant, the City and the biologist. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for.review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Areas or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. Kathleen Taylor July 13, 2000 Name Signature Date • - CA FILE NO. LOW- 105 Critical Areas Checklist --- --------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: lI V a iji S f,_ � I, G 2. Property Tax Account Number: �'4179 000 00.X 03 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): a-ccG 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? - 5. Describe the general site topography. Check al that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a / horizontal distance of 66-feet). V Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a'horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal -distance of less than 33-feet)• Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ►40 ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Yet ; Approx. Depth: 3 What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? )• 10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs : mixed _ urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ► 18 u : For City Staff 1 Tse ©nly� 1 Sate is 2aaed7 Z SCS snapped r. ::. . W unto :.:.'r..:e:. a e p A.:zn �c a etl d: : us ,ate :etl nd� an :w r11;:o xt � .: • iz Cntical Areas arventory orC A map urtiic2te9 Crltical Area on sitesG►:`.:1'�i. Vthiit.destgnafec earth subslenee Xandslide Hazard are ..'�,�t 0�7r 1�✓(X,Ii''�'TJGtP Sitedestgnated on the 1~nvironrneafallyenstttve . ...... BETE 1VI AT .S:T�iJD1'�EQ�TIR�D:>`<>>•:.h: :A I r. >W ,R ate ^a-ehkdK Rw 10/03/97 OF EP& �y City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone:425.771.0220 Joe. I aq0 Fax: 425.771.0221 Critical Areas File #: COS Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Received by Dev. Serv. Dept: City Receipt No: 4 Date Mailed to Applicant: CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds Prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address eI iCity State Zip I. d:receptioNjana/CACLHa ndout.doc Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date Revised 4/10/2000 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Mark E. Dreyer Determination #: CA-2000-105 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 1142 Vista Place Property Tax Acct #: 5489-000-022-03 Project Description: non -project specific A site inspection of the property has revealed a lot developed with a single family residence. The site contains or is adjacent to wetlands and also appears to contain or is adjacent to slopes of 40% or greater with a vertical elevation change of more than 20 feet. Based on the above findings, it is determined that there is potentially a wetland critical area and steep slope critical area(s) on or adjacent to the site. A Critical Areas Study is required to delineate the boundaries of the potential critical areas, buffers and setbacks. A wetland biologist must locate the wetland and identify the classification of the wetland; then a licensed land surveyor must create a map of the site which indicates the wetland. location and the buffer location. For steep slopes, a licensed surveyor must create a topographic map of the site that indicates all areas that slope 40% or more and have a vertical gain of 20 feet or more within the 40% slopes. The map must also show the location of the steep slope buffers and setbacks. Since the possible wetland and possible steep slopes may be located on adjacent property, the City understands that the owner of the subject property may not be able to gain legal access to that property. Adjacent property owners must grant permission to access, and the City is not implying consent to access an adjacent property. If applicant is unable to gain access to adjacent properties, the City will accept a surveyed map with the best estimate of the steep slope and wetand locations. For the purposes of determining the buffer location, the City will assume that the wetland is a Class 2, unless a report from a wetland biologist proves otherwise. Any work performed by a wetland biologist must be prepared through a three party contract with the applicant, the City and the biologist. If the property owner wishes to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Areas or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. Kathleen Taylor July 13, 2000 Name Signature Date CITY OF EDMONDS RECORD OF NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA EASEMENT All applications and notices directed to the Edmonds Planning Division shall be made to: 121-5`� Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 GRANTOR(S): Mark E. Dreyer & Shelley M. Dreyer -Green Owner(s) of the hereinafter described real property hereby grants to: GRANTEE(S): The City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation A Native Growth Protection Area Easement for the following purposes is reserved for and granted to the City of Edmonds and its citizens in order to preserve the physical aesthetic character of the City through the prevention of indiscriminate removal or destruction of native vegetative growth on developed or partially developed property, over and across the hereinafter described real property ("Burdened Estate"). This easement is given to satisfy a condition of the Critical Areas Determination Conditional Waiver, # CA-2000-105, dated November 21, 2000. It is in response to a building permit application for construction of a new single family residence, plan check #00-397, upon the following described property, the.Burdened Estate; Legal Description: The south 165 feet of Tract 22, Puget Sound Machinery Depot Five -Acre Tracts, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 5, of Plats, Page 47, records of Snohomish County, Washington. L L except the west 380 feet thereof. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. The Assessor's Tax Parcel Number: 5489-000-002-03 A native growth protection easement covering the herein described property is hereby established to maintain native growth within the easement area. No structure of any kind shall be erected in the easement area, except as noted in Attachment C, nor shall the native growth maintained in the areas be disturbed in any manner including but not limited to grading, trimming, cutting or any other removal of any vegetation including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, brush or aquatic plants, shall occur within the easement area. Vegetation within the area shall not be removed through the use of fire, herbicides or the application of any chemicals. In the event of the death or destruction of the native growth within the area, it shall promptly be replaced with trees, shrubs, vegetation and aquatic plants of a kind and type similarly occurring in natural undisturbed areas of Western Washington. All such species introduced shall be reviewed and approved prior to planting by the City of Edmonds. In the event that any tree of other vegetation within the area poses a threat to the safety of adjacent property or property owners, application for its removal may be made to the Edmonds Planning Division. The easement is legally described in Attachment A and shown in the map on Attachment B. This easement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns, and shall run with the land, until which time a study is completed to verify the location of the critical area and its buffer. DATED this L�Jk"_ �,. , 20QD Dreyer STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me MC)or-K E Dr-f jot — to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that nc. signed the same as %l�s free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this 61u, day of Dc.Mb� 2066 DEBRA L. KARBER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES otary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at APRIL a, 2003 LunmioocL DATED this &Nay of bee , 2O&j OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY: Shdfey- M. reyer-Green STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me jh2� �Q�/ M r)R1ALL7&ffl , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that h Q, signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of ,f 1avrrdi-&I 20 (111 DEBRA L. KARBER � �% I. AI NOTARY PUBLIC Q (� /�,/ - STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 8, 2003 �ynr)w,-,- The foregoing Agreement is accepted by the City of Edmonds this eday of DeCeinbe2 ! 2000. ACCEPTED: City of Edmonds Man Development Services Department — Planning Division RO CHAVE, Planning Director Date: 24 1 �� A.F.M. Industries, Inc. (Professional Land Surveying and Planning) 3924 204th St. S.W. 425) 778-1649 - office Lynnwood Wa. 98036 (425) 778-6892 - fax Date: DEC. 08, 2000 DRYER/HELLEREN JOB NO.2000-024 LEGAL DESCRIPTION-N.G.P.A./E THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF THE WEST 145.00 FEET OF PARCEL A, CITY OF EDMONDS, BOUNDARY LINE OF ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.9307080525, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. O G. F wA,s Nit i o$ 00 2125/n 1 01 Attachment A FROM : WDFW MT. OERHON PHONE NO. : 360 42 1�71 t1ov. 16 2000 12:37PM P2 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard - Mill Greek, Washington 98012 - (42,,) 75 13'i 1 November 3, 2000 Pacific Emerald Homes, Inc. ATTN: Sigve Helleren P.O. Box 882 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr He)leren- SUBJECT: Hydraulic Project Application; Unnamed Tributary to Hindley Creek; Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 03 East; Snohomish County; WRIA 08.0008; WDFW Log No. 00-E5287-01 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) received the above -referenced Hydraulic Project Application on October 26, 2000. Review of the plans and specifications and a visit to the site on. November 2, 2000, indicate a Hydraulic Project Approval will not be required from WDFW for this project. There are no direct impacts to the natural bed or flow of the stream, we are therefore canceling your application. We appreciate your cooperation in our efforts to protect, perpetuate and manage the fish resources of the state of Washington. If you have any questions, please contact the at (425) 379-2309, Sincerely.. Tony Oppermann Area Habitat Biologist TO: to: F5287 cc: WRIA File, Olympia Attachment C APPLICANT: brey erlNellawh PROJECT #: plan GhCG� #DO-399 TAX ACCT#: 5q j$q _ 0o0- p02- 03 SITE PLAN: 2 OF 10' EASEMENT A.F. #815307 0 �� I I10EASEMENT A. F. #815306 eb i I , °,,. TRACT 22 - I I � I I , L-----------------------I N89'34'28"W 240.01 0 0 0 0 _ S89'34'28"E 145.01 _ N G P A /E ol� 0 O 145.01 Icon 240.01 S89'34'28"E GRAPHIC SCALE I 25 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET ) I 1 inch = 50 ft. N. G.P.A./E. DRYER/HELLERAN � 23 ►� 25 CITY OF EDMONDS I PTN. OF N.E. 1/4, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST. W.M. APPROVED SNO CO PDS DATE Grantor DATE Attachment B FROM : WDFW MT. OERNON PHONE NO. : 360 428 1571 Nov. 16 2000 12:37PM P2 NNW aTA7, 4. < z Jy1 terse ��~ State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office., 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard - Mill Greek, Washington 98012 - (425) 7 76-1311 November 3, 2000 Pacific Emerald Homes, Inc. ATTN: Sigve Helleren P.O. Box 882 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr Helleren: R-v i , r DEVELOR'Z",, 1'-'-;v!CE6 CTR. CH11 0= " ,.,A0N0S SUBJECT: Hydraulic Project Application; Unnamed Tributary to Hindley Creek; Section 24, Township 27 North, Range 03 East; Snohomish Country; WRIA 08.0008; WDFW Log No. 00-E5287-01 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) received the above -referenced Hydraulic Project Application on October 26, 2000. Review of the plans and specifications and a visit to the site on November 2, 2000, indicate a Hydraulic Project Approval will not be required from WDFW for this project. There are no direct impacts to the natural bed or flow of the stream, we are therefore canceling your application. We appreciate your cooperation in our efforts to protect, perpetuate and manage the fish resources of the state of Washington. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 379-2309, Sincerely, Tony Oppermann Area Habitat Biologist TO:to:E5287 cc: WRIA File, Olympia cs� RECEIVED SEP 12 2000 DEVELOPMENT- SERVICES CTR. CITY -OF EDMONDS c" op <14 e. TE RE CEIV D' }" 2 I PERMIT EXIP R�5' . USE PERMIT. CIT " OF EDMONDS zoNE NUMBER .�, CONSTRUCTI N PERMIT. , , +t.OB ADDRESS :. ` / SUITE(APT# V fsi�► �� . INNER NAME/NAM BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBLIIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID.FEE $ W •L MAILING ADDRESS ^ PUBLIC RIGHT.OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET,MAP 7ESCP Approved Q RW et use Requged C) , Street use Perreq Read 0 G EXISTING, -„ PROPOSE • -- Inspection lclewRqulreduIregyp, Sklewalk'Requlred Q� CITY Zip . TELEPHONE ..r REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Ar�required underground MET R SIZE LINE SIZE NO..OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED . YE NO Z E i fAIDRE6! Z REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE` FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE Z' W. ITY ZIP ' TELEPHONEon IG , ^+! `Ger �f V ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DA kr!'`�1frT{►�./ ., ¢ O F DRESS 22: off .. FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE ¢ ¢TII U((�"�'{��r► i ZIP TELEPHONE " LL „VARIANCE OR Cy IN R ADB# H REL E O S O t INSPECTION REQ'D ., BOND POSTED XPIRATIOWDATE STATE LICENSE NUMBER E , CHECKED BY. ' i/1"�� •�r�•I!'�. CjC� 4!! .. .......^'^""'�.r.. O.. � Y.ES - ',,:SIGNAREA':�. . . HEIGHT; SEPA-REVIEW -j Q PROPE TY TA ACCOUNT PARCEL NO + COMPLETE , EXEMPT. • ALLOWED PROPOSED " ',ALLOWED 'PROPOSED / � ' Q EXP NEW i9ESIDENTIAL (gJ. PLUMBING/'MECH LOT COVERAGE,. :ALLOWED PROPOS PI EQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SS BACKS(FT) FRONT I REAR c7 _. COMPLIANCE OR ' O ADDITION COMMERCIAL 'CHANGE OF USE �O • (V O, ,;�,0�' Z PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY . DATE a ., ❑;..,SIGN.. REMODEL APARTMENT REQ D 'PROVIDED sKn� GR FENCE 0REPAIR LJ4G�I1N • --F-#- CYDS• O ( X �) S' Cs!c�S54 14 .r-/{%«rTv EMOLISH TANK OTHER D (� ❑ °k. , G ARAG E AININ WALL , RET O':. (' , „RENEWAL CARPORT �4 a v CHECKED BY TYPE CON ON Dlic GROUP (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN ... w .NUMBER . OF NUMBER OF DWELLING '�` "' CRITICAL ''AREAS �„ SPECIALINSPECTOR REQUIRED AREA t O1'iCUPANT MIa1N: "1 D LOAD O STORIES '.'.UNITS;, NUMBER 0 YES 'DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS ;, ., ! _ PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC'108/FINAL'rINSPECTION REQ'D o „,. ^�'� +. c'IJI '.I ..+. VALUATION, FEE PLAN CHECK FEE •SLOPE LAZING /e C / �+ T SOURCE :, : BUILDING ., " VEQTED DATE PLUMBING PLAN CHECK NO:,, MECHANICAL110 'HIS PERMIT ONLY THE WORK,NOTED PERMIT,COVERS' WORK TO THISDOMAIN _ NSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC ' %�+• "' ' BE DO PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CON i QUEES ETC) WILL REQUIRE,GRADING/FILL (CURBS,, SIDEWALKS DRIVEWAYS MART J SEPARATE;PERMISSIO } $TATESURQHARGE ee W PERMIT'APPLICATION: 180 DAY$ �. + a PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR PROVIDED WORK'IS START,EOVITHIN 180 DAYS ENG REVIEW F, EES S"Q SEE.BACK,OF PINWPERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION P. N J '. ENG INSPECTION FEE 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS ASSIG(IIS,AND,$UCCESORS w IN INTEREST,•AGII TO INDEMNIFY~QEFEND,AND.HOLD,HIjRMLESS THE CIT� OF AND FROM ANY AND EDMONDS; WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS;.EMPLOYEES AGENTS ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGESOF WHATEVER NATURE,'ARISINC,,,DIRECT,LYOR INDIR7dCTLY RE IPT . _ , FROM, THE ISSUANCE OF THIS, PERMIT: ISSUANCE OF'THIS PERMIT, SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVEOR: REDUCE ANY R,EQUIREMENTOFANYCITYORDINANCE i. •.NOR LIMITINANYWAY.THECITY'SABILITYTOENFORCEANYORDINANCEPROVISION RECEIPT ' TOTALAMOUNTD IHEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT LHAVE:BEA THISAPPLI CATION; THAT THE RMATION TION.APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT;. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER; OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APP IC.A THE OWNER. I''AGREE TO'COMPLY WITH CITY;AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC• This applicalion is not:a permit until signed by -the CALL TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK; AUTHORIZED, THEREBY; NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED . Building'Officlal or his/her Deputy: soil Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION,OF THE, LABOR CODE OF"THE STATE; OF WASHINGTON.:RELATING TO :. FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in spacs provided. WORKMEN'S OOMPENSATION.INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27 OFF IALS SIGNATURE, DATE ' DAT 'SIG D: ` � �4 25) � TORE . ;. � / � ov M;. l i Da, ,.: Ly 71 �OZZO RELEASED B DATE ATTENTION EXT 333 00 UNTIL L I: IT IS UNLAWFULTO USE OR;OCCUPY A BUDDING OR STRUCTURE 771'0221- A. FINAL', INSPECTION HAS;BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL.OR A CERT, IGINA FILE YELLOW-INSPEC OR L OR CATE OF; OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED UB,C;S,ECTION 1.09 . FAX t PINK OWNER ,GOLD •ASSESSOR 5/98 t' �r Mp CITY OF EDMONDS SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLE% COVER SHEET r�r. 1 f9e Directions: Applicants are to complete the Information In the WNITE R(�XES ONLY (Shaded oozes are for City use only). This cover shoat must accompany each bulldinp permit �pplicatlon for a new single-family residence. !" 1 P. PROJECT. ADDRESS .7 PROPERTY TAX ACC[] NT PARCEL 1 -L3 DESCRIPTION OF WORK -Y*,� S VfK yryiC O11� G C�gQJ OWNER PHONE C' CONTACTPERSON�e- V1 -C-CV'1 PHONE Qa54�Ijr�%(�gq E-MAIL FAX MAILING ADDRESS -�O .lam' DEC `1 a;)- FAX CORRECTIONS M MAIL CORRECTIONS E-MAIL CORRECTIONS BY SIGNING THIS STATEMENT I UNDERSTAND THAT I AM THE CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE ALL SUBMITTALS WITH THE CITY AND ONLY 1 CAN MAKE INQUIRIES ON THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION. 1 UNDERSTAND IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IN ADVANCE OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL ANY DISCRETIONARY PERMITS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TO THE BEST OF MT ABILITY 1 HAVE SUBMITTED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN ORDER TO MAKE A COMPLETE APPLICATION A D NO DISCRETIONA T APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED. GI SIGNATU > DATE Z ZONING INF RMATION ZONE S,1Z— LOT AREA J O NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS; EXISTING_ DEMOLISHED PROPOSED_ DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS CA cl�,1�7bil- 1 OS" Dete minatlon SUBDIVISION CU VARIANCE SHORELINE SEPA Expires OTHER erhd( City USO OnIX �s C LOT COVERAGE INFORMA ION a0.r�1 O O EXISTING SIP PROPOSED SF TOTAL SF': + ' % HEIGHT CALCULATION INFORMATION t� p DATUM `'�W �vvT"A13%3B �.IUI.�� D . AVE O • MAX -2 2� ACTUAL' SETBACK INFORMATION REQUIRED FRONT 10 SIDE ( Q 1 SIDE (� 1 REAR I EROPOSED FRONT SIDE qN , SIDE_ REAR J CNR.'LOT JOY ES N10 YES 1[]NO ST.'DEDIC.YES 10' T. ADU STATEM-NTpDUSTATEM -NT REQUIRED ' YES NO . RECORDING 1 STAFF COMMENTS: 4,- P iQ A-Ie &aSeevie-r-L+ :: U; . o S D ENGINEERING INFORMATION DRIVEWAY SLOPE �% ` �� b GRADING CYDS Lp EASEMENTS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 197704L&_4jk SO.FT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA INSTALLED 1977 OR LATER SO.FT. PROPOSED NEW NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE t)O Citv'Use Only SIDEWALK REQUIRED[] YES ®NO DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED ®YES []NO UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRE[) CfflYES [—]NO STREET DEDICATION�i�st/�Pi R%i FT. LID# STAFF COMMENTS: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT (City Use Only) SOILS, STRUCTURAL: START OF WORK PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT . EXCAVATION A GRADINGPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SHORING INSTALLATION.B MONITORING BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE PROOF ROLLING STRUCTURAL MASONRY PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING VERIFY SOIL BEARING WELDING (WABO CERTIFIED ONLY) 13 PILE PLACEMENTOTHER El EROSION CONTROL GENERAL SITE MONITORING BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD . GENERAL SITE MONITORING BY THE GEOTE CHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD 'DURING WET WEATHER CONSTRUCTION FINAL GRADING & FIELD REPORT OTHER PLAN CRECH 1 APPLICANT DATE RECEIVED 0 O BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION CODE EDITIONS 1997 UBC. UMC, UPC. WSEC. VIAG WITH AMENDMENTS DESIGN CRITERIA WIND EXPOSURE B WIND SPEED 90 MPH SEISMIC ZONE 2 jj/� Floor Live Load �tb Roof SeowlLlve Load .i Balcony Live Load Floor Dead Losd_W Root Dead Load 1 [� BBleony Dead Load NUMBER OF STORIES BASEMENTS FLOOD ZONE LOT SLOPE % 2Eq —_ SOILS REPORT PROVIDED 0 YES NO FLOOR AREA (MEASURED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL) Existing Proposed 4 Total Living Space Garage Carport Dock/Covered Porch other ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION FUrL TYPE GAS. OIL ELECTRIC OTHER KA FORCED AIR HEAT PUMP []HYDRONIC []OTHER ENERGY CODE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE PRESCRIPTIVE: List Option #__== TARGET UA APPROACH: Provide UA Calcustions SYSTEMS ANALYSIS: Provide Computer Analysis [] ENERGY/VENTILATION WORKSHEETS PROVIDED [] WINDOW SCHEDULE PROVIDED FOR CITY USE ONLY Ceiling Insulation _ Wall Insulation Floor Insulation Door U-Valuo , y Window U-Valued Skylight U-Volue Glazing % VENTILATION CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION KITCHEN FAN CFM = BATHROOM FAN(S) CFM LAUNDRY FAN CFM WHOLE HOOSE VENTILATION SYSTEM []EXHAUST OPTION . FRESH AIR TO BE PROVIDED TO 13 WINDOW VENTS [] WALL PORTS EACH HABITABLE ROOM WITH: EXHAUST FAN TO BE CONTROLLED WITH 2e HOUR TIMER AND SIZED AS FOLLOWS: [] 1 - 2 BEDROOMS: 50 - 75 CFM tAK BEDROOMS: 100 - 150 CFM [] 3 BEDROOMS: 80 - 120 CFM []5 BEDROOMS: 120.180 CFM E4-VAC INTEGRATED OPTION []DEDICATED HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATION OPTION SEPARATE PERMITS (City Use Only) RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT []MECHANICAL PERMIT ENCROACHMENT PERMIT []PLUMBING PERMIT STATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT [] WATER METER []FENCE PERMIT []SIDE SEWER PERMIT []RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT []IRRIGATION (SPRINKLER SYSTEM) []OTHER []OTHER Any request for modification. variance or other administrative deviation (herinafler "variance') must be specifically called out and Identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with the city coda and for which a variance has not been specifically identllied. requested and considered by the appropriate city official In accordance with the appropriate provision of City code or state low does not approve any Items not to code specification. PERMIT ISSUANCE APp OVALS (Cit Use Only PLANNING REVIEW A APPROVAL C DATE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ENGINEERING REVIEW at APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: DATE 72 BUILDING REVIEW A APPROVAL - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: �i Te 0, CITY OF EDMONDS SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX COVER SHEET Directions: Applicants are to complete the Information In the WHITE BOXES ONLY (Shaded boxes are tot City use only). This cover sheet must accompany each building permit application for a new single-family namence. PROJECT ADDRESS 2 PROPERTY TAX AC'0 NT PARCEL # Z2:- p DESCRIPTION OF WORK S �(L_y. UCO�I.t, (.0✓ OWNER PHONE CONTACT PERSON PHONE E-MAIL FAX4a5%�l�$� Q ^� MAILING ADDRESS FAX CORRECTIONS MAIL CORRECTIONS E-MAIL CORRECTIONS BY SIGNING THIS STATEMENT I UNDERSTAND THAT I AM THE CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE ALL SUBMITTALS WITH THE CITY AND ONLY I CAN MAKE INQUIRIES ON THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION. 1 UNDERSTAND IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IN ADVANCE OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL ANY DISCRETIONARY PERMITS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE SUBMITTED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN ORDER TO MAKE A COMPLETE APPLICATION A D NO DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED. Q� DATE SIGNATUn,, ZONING INF RMAT`ION �S ZONE 12-, LOT AREA 0 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS' EXISTING/ DEMOLISHED PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS CA Q0:5� Date mination 71ft SUBDIVISION CU VARIANCE SHORELINE SEPA Expires OTHER (li}IQ City Use Only LOT COVERAGE iNFORMA ION A0yw01j d EXISTING SFPROPOSED SF1 TOTAL SF� % HEIGHT CALCULATION INFORMATION DATUM "�Ju�!''"-"A13'f3B YOC1111-1DAVE . ' O • MAX 12� Z�" ACTUAL SETBACK INFORMATION REQUIRED FRONT— is SIDE�� SIDE I o REAR 0. PROPOSED FRONT jQ SIDE' SIDE $ j r" REAR '7 �" - CNR.'LOT ❑YES NO FLAGLO YESE]N0"SLDE01C.❑YES OL'iT. ADU STATEMENT REOUIRED []YES NO`". RECORDING! STAFF COMMENTS: L(Cee5 J" • ILL. �atS��1�►-L 1 U 2..ld S M I— o ENGINEERING INFORMATION LrQ� DRIVEWAY SLOPE % S ') 1, GRADING CYDS 4 lQ � EASEMENTS pp EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1977SO.FT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA INSTALLED 1977 OR LATER SOFT. PROPOSED NEW NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE % no r City Use Only Cltys se e JtSle SIDEWALK REQUIRED -]YES �NO DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED YES �NO UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED C@YES [-]NO STREET DEDICATION FT. FT. LID# STAFF COMMENTS: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT (City Use Only) SOILS: STRUCTURAL: START OF WORK PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT EXCAVATION & GRADING PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SHORING INSTALLATION & MONITORING BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE PROOF ROLLING STRUCTURAL MASONRY PLACEMENT OF FILL 8 COMPACTION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING VERIFY SOIL BEARING WELDING (WASO CERTIFIED ONLY) PILE PLACEMENT OTHER EROSION CONTROL GENERAL SITE MONITORING BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD . GENERAL SITE MONITORING BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD DURING WET WEATHER CONSTRUCTION FINAL GRADING & FIELD REPORT OTHER APPLICANT PLAIN CHECK _ DATE RECEIVED UO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION CODE EDITIONS 1997 UBC, UMC, UPC, WSEC, VIAO WITKAMENDMENTS DESIGN CRITERIA WIND EXPOSURE B WIND SPEED 80 MPH SEISMIC ZONE 3 Floor Live Load 4b Root Snow/Live Load d Balcony Live Load Floor Dead Load Roof Dead Load �� Balcony Dead Load .0 NUMBER OF STORIES BASEMENTS FLOOD ZONE LOT SLOPE % 2=_ SOILS REPORT PROVIDED YES ❑ NO FLOOR AREA (MEASURED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL) Existing Proposed Total �v Living Space Garage r�u 10 Z I Carport Dock/Covered Porch Other — ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION FUEL TYPE ®,GAS, OIL ELECTRIC 11 OTHER 17 FORCED AIR HEAT PUMP [:]HYDRONIC OTHER ENERGY CODE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE PRESCRIPTIVE: List Option #__-7r, TARGET UA APPROACH: Provide UA Calcuations SYSTEMS ANALYSIS: Provide Computer Analysis ENERGY/VENTILATION WORKSHEETS PROVIDED WINDOW SCHEDULE PROVIDED FOR CITY USE ONLY Ceiling Insulation Wall Insulation Floor Insulation Door U-Value Window U-Value_+a Skylight U-Value , Glazing % VENTILATION CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION KITCHEN FAN CFM. BATHROOM FAN(S) CFM LAUNDRY FAN CFM WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION SYSTEM EXHAUST OPTION " FRESH AIR TO BE PROVIDED TO ❑ WINDOW VENTS WALL PORTS EACH HABITABLE ROOM WITH: EXHAUST FAN TO BE CONTROLLED WITH 24 HOUR TIMER AND SIZED AS FOLLOWS: ❑ 1 - 2 BEDROOMS: 50 - 75 CFM r64 BEDROOMS: 100 - 150 CFM 3 BEDROOMS: 80 - 120 CFM 115 BEDROOMS: 120.180 CFM E9,MVAC INTEGRATED OPTION DEDICATED HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATION OPTION SEPARATE PERMITS (City Use Only) RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 0ENCROACHMENT PERMIT . 9STATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT r❑FENCE PERMIT RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT 13 OTHER MECHANICAL PERMIT PLUMBING PERMIT WATER METER SIDE SEWER PERMIT IRRIGATION (SPRINKLER SYSTEM) OTHER Any request lot modification, variance or other administrative deviation (herinalter 'variance') must be specifically called out and Identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not Comply with the city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and consideredby the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any Items not to code specification. PERMIT ISSUANCE APPROVAL S(C i ty Use Only PLANNING REVIEW A APPROVAL �DATE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ENGINEERING REVIEW a: APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: DATE BUILDING REVIEW A APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: /'M TE Qajj CITY CLERIC CITY OF EDMONDS 121 STH AVENUE NO. EDMONDS, WA 98020 ti EY CONFORMED COPY DEC 2 7 2000 200012270296 u05 005 i�6, 12/27/2000 11 :54 AM Snohomish t E ,Jg P.0005 RECORDED County 3Y-"'"�`' CITY OF EDMONDS RECORD OF NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA EASEMENT All applications and notices directed to the Edmonds Planning Division shall be made to: 121-5`h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 GRANTOR(S): Mark E. Dreyer & Shelley M. Dreyer -Green Owner(s) of the hereinafter described real property hereby grants to: GRANTEE(S): The City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation I t0." V%e fit... A Native Growth Protection Area Easement for the following purposes is reserved for and granted to the City of Edmonds and its citizens in order to preserve the physical aesthetic character of the City through the prevention of indiscriminate removal or destruction of native vegetative growth on developed or partially developed property, over and across the hereinafter described real property ("Burdened Estate"). I This easement is given to satisfy a condition of the Critical Areas Determination Conditional Waiver, # CA-2000-105, dated November 21, 2000. It is in response to a building permit application for construction of a new single family residence, plan check #00-397, upon the following described property, the Burdened Estate; Legal Description: The south 165 feet of Tract 22, Puget Sound Machinery Depot Five -Acre Tracts, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume. 5, of Plats, Page 47, records of Snohomish County, Washington. L L except the west 380 feet thereof. Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. The Assessor's Tax Parcel Number: 5489-000-002-03 A native growth protection easement covering the herein described property is hereby established to maintain native growth within the easement area. No structure of any kind shall be erected in the easement area, except as noted in Attachment C, nor shall the native growth maintained in the areas be disturbed in any manner including but not limited to grading, trimming, cutting or any other removal of any vegetation including, but not limited to trees, shrubs, brush or aquatic plants, shall occur within the easement area. Vegetation within the area shall not be removed through the use of fire, herbicides or the application of any chemicals. In the event of the death or destruction of the native growth within the area, it shall promptly be replaced with trees, shrubs, vegetation and aquatic plants of a kind and type similarly occurring in natural undisturbed areas of Western Washington. All such species introduced shall be reviewed.and approved prior to planting by the City of Edmonds. In the event that any tree of other vegetation within the area poses a threat to the safety of adjacent property or property owners, application for its removal may be made to the Edmonds Planning Division. The easement is legally described in Attachment A and shown in the map on Attachment B. This easement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns, and shall run with the land, until which time a study is completed to verify the location of the critical area and its buffer. DATED this TY: Dreyer STATE OF WASHINGTON} } ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before me Mo -K E Drf.Uf r to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he, signed the same as hRG free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this 8-ti, day of De.U/Mb41(— 20 64 DEBRA L. KARBER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 0, 2003 Public in and for the State of Washington residing at nwioo& DATED this &Nay of Dee , 200 j OWNER OF REAL PROPERTY: Ntiley M. reyer-Green STATE OF WASHINGTON) I ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day personally appeared before mejL(l�t,{ �✓) Y�1AtY rpey� , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within .and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as nQ►� free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this . day of Fj W LU-tA 20 (11) DEBRA L. KARBER +. NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public �J STATE OF WASHINGTON rY and for the State of Washington residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 0, 2003 " 1 nnJ✓` ��l7 The foregoing Agreement is accepted by the City of Edmonds this h day of beuinbo--, 2000. ACCEPTED: City of Edmonds Plairni an Development Services Department —Planning Division ROP CHAVE, Planning Director Date: 1241 �'� to A.F.M. Industries, Inc. (Professional Land Surveying and Planning) 3924 204th St. S.W. 425) 778-1649 - office Lynnwood Wa. 98036 (425) 778-6892 - fax Date: DEC. 08, 2000 DRYER/HELLEREN JOB NO.2000-024 LEGAL DESCRIPTION-N.G.P.A./E THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF THE WEST 145.00 FEET OF PARCEL A, CITY OF EDMONDS, BOUNDARY LINE OF ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.9307080525, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. OG.IE J� • WAS ' 4zr On 2/2s5/ r it Attachment A APPLICANT: Pre-oer- `%-Beni -af'I PROJECT #: pian ctirG� Do- q� TAX ACCT#: ry$9�0olJ�vo2 - 03 . SITE PLAN: 2 OF 10' EASEMENT A.F. #815307 10' EASEMENT A.F. #815306 C)o V TRACT 22 — i � � I 23 `r � _ — — — — _ ^ — N89'34'28"W 240.01 w 9 _ S89'34'28"E _ 145.01 �M N.G.P.A./E. C.) O � e} a 145.01 _ Icon 240.01 S89'34'28"E GRAPHIC SCALE 25 0 25 50 100 hm ( .IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. N.G.P.A./E. DRYERIHELLERAN O 214 t� !� o 3 O vi U) �l z � 25 I I � I CITY OF EDMONDS PTN. , OF N.E. 1 /4, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. APPROVED SNO CO PDS DATE Grantor nATF Attachment B FROM : (JDF6J MT. k:'ERHOH PHONE NO. : 360 4'28 1571 Floor. 16 2000 12:37Ph1 P_' -t m t z State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Region 4 Office: 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard - Mill Greek, Washington 98012 - (42,r,) 7 75-1311 November 3, 2000 Pacific Emerald Homes, Inc. ATTN: Sigve Helleren P.O. Box 882 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr Helleren: SUBJECT: Hydraulic Project Application; Unnamed Tributary to Hindley Creek; . .Section 24; Township 27 North, Range 03 East; Snohomish County; WRIA, _08.0008; WDFW Log No. 00-E5287-01 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) received the above -referenced Hydraulic Project Application on October 26, 2000. Review of the plans and specifications and a visit to the site on November 2, 2000, indicate a Hydraulic Project Approval will not be required from WDFW for this project. There are no direct impacts to the natural bed or flow of the stream, we are therefore canceling your application. We appreciate your cooperation in our efforts to protect, perpetuate and manage the fish resources of the state of Washington. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 379-2309. Sincerely; Tony Oppermann Area Habitat. Biologist TO:to:F5i87 CC" WRIA File, Olympia Attachment C L� ,47 ell ole— i; a, -x ° ° s IN 7 `n lS IV Doi JAW X 17 o fl PFLOP03 P p O17 ! --- - 2 C1, / �� l I , l / / / /—1,aawtT FF= 13 i• D o- c . J ►v O Gam, / ! , / / /X► X io �c /[K IT x 57 9-6 a F• �. MOP W"NSI -FOR 1 � ° md1�- INSECTIGNS OP 1 _ ---- - ,ZI, 0'A Y 0 3 { ,- 155. D 1 -- ,--., 0 nl 0mi� - - i, - ,� J6 u ^ -i m fT1 I o v^ NqO-1 0 5 J7 W I r m 10 °o s'O I °,0\AJ r.r)3t0 u °r awe. ➢ LA f m 0z A N a m ' N APPROVED BY ENGINEERING 4�3NZZ7 I N o • v/ ` /L' ������.1� 1• • , rig 3 Date: AId v l �_�•���1 t1__ RECEIVED APPROVED BY PLANNING S E P 12 2000 U/ Qv DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS