1146 7TH AVE S.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII
6948
1146 7TH AVE S
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER cl 1 1 40V B OO `C b 0
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): e �� n �)
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: ' Jmk k.y ml
CRITICAL AREAS: D5 ` [ 51 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver kstudy Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER): /
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:10
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: 3I ek& _ 141101,6
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER
LATEMMS'PsTorms\Street File Checldist.doc
APPROV-90 AS NOTED
M7 TICE REQ.
24 AR. NOT11"C'161 -F-NFE
FOR INSPECTION OWN'c';R/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BY WIRING
EROSION CONTRM AND DRAINAr.
84bg 86." T, PENCE TO WBe
M41 am Mal am
TEMP. EK0&ot40NTpt0L 0 30 1 L
WFENCE FRONTYARD
REMYARD T. 6ETBACK qo.c/
eup
20 v%
am
OfV (Av41D
10 UDE
ACATED AREA OETERIINW TO Z�
— ------ TIN
BE NONJ19TLAND 5Y
ALLEY KRAZAN 4 A880c, NC,
U
SEE OWARATE REPORT RIMATION
tilt L RESIDENCE VALVE
of r,- � -'. /M M43
MAIN FLR WATM
III r-OF-WAY NSTRUCTION PEFUR
EL- 100.cJV MUM
q AND IN31E TION RE QL IRED
WW an C"ry OPIEOoko�y )-3 s;m. 06TAiL
v10UT2 4cau OP068W
3,0 vi ADMON Z'
CURB 1; CORNER
Y
_.ter tp E
Iu E FE 074 ,
' h�afis 11' G T T'- EXTENT OF
TO
026]
IS-
914 SF
LOMT goioTw.
MIN=
OWN
TEMP. ;Lotf�PENCS ALVE IUP%.
IbW*v"1"'-"1 .2 , ..........
Marya e,yti OF
OF
E SURFACES...
ME
S4M "c*
02M WITHIN D v F D W 1 1 �r'
Oslo
WcMT OP E"T.1
W" iWAS W.0 TV-Z1W-07KTE-7 WOW
ex
M63 =1 TOM
*Novi -Wt+i4t1c( p4w
&W plan Zone P-9— (v Comer Wflag W v 10 20
Selbagica RegWred Actual
X-mot an Apv,-Uob-o4-j0-o59W Front f=- 7,0 *- RESUB
APPROVED . BY PLANNING Sides tj I5 5 5 MAY 0 3 2006
W 00/101ZOO Rear w l S ti to<
G E AMLENT
p
Other OFOEDM "o 01
A
Z 0
Site Plan 1 of 2
Coward Reside 1146 7th Ave S
Edmonds, WA 9802
eric gedney ARCHITECT 1034 NE 71 st, Seattle, WA 98115 206.527.4928 eric@egMey-com
7-21 v-
WY 6
75'
125'
El House f
E"Garage
Woodshed
Deck.
ZONE
SETB'
F.
R EA' R
OTHER'-,�
H-ElGHT,'--!,--,iv
�t cm� I �.Cpy
CR. V., EDJAONDS
31
iUx,-DEPT-*`
CONDITIONAL-!, PERM
-WORK- P"
,
ADDRESS. '//#67
Fc
OWNER -
APPROVED DATE -
BY
BLDG. OFFI*
KEEP THESE STAMPED:
PLANS ON JOBSITE FOR,',.
Lots 3 and 4, Together with thelast one-half'of vacate( alley ALL INSPECTIONS.
adjacent thereto, all in Block 0 YOSTS FIRST ADDITION I U-Lmt- N euery
KXMI1,
CITY OF EDr-10NDS, according to the plat thereof recorde( in.
—
6 rds of Snohomish Couity,
Volume 8 Of Plats, on pgggreco
Washington, EXCEPT the North 165.00-feet thereof. Situare- 11F
the county of Snohomish, State of Washington.
413/ e-
� #PZo �
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
1.
2.
3.
4.
Site Address/ Location:
CA File No: 05 b i5
Property Tax Account Numberv.g I � �O ruu �A V O
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): �� t X
Is this site currently develope
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site .of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over. a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ;Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) ear? L��
� s) of the Y (� 11�L
8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a watercourse.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? . (What time of year? ).
10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs; ; mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc)
A-
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
For City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? N o ny 4_i.K 0 w n .
2. Site is Zoned? GJ .
3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? I ( t Vtffr,tj raAr l 4 .6 aM d l t 1 D A VYI 0 — `d '1• 5 t,o P-P— S
4. Criticid Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? U QA E M(AD -iVO yl " h CA1A ICA 51
r.A- wiAQ . ► 114-tY tiviv yu-yim-&�t ; AS wQ,t,Di I Inna.+zu`I5 .-nII iireiS4.FZyXi,
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? ND ( fowf 13 u i'1 d (Vl j Off -,'"'a 1
to w►� � -fi v� a t d �tfiVyvli n a fi v� �
yU yi p� yq rd Ar p0tc-yTka I DETERMINATION
Wt-H Q STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewed by. M/VVl/1i (/t7m,*4� Date: I CA 2,611.0 D 6
#P20
ED'
°f &0+ City. o dmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
toy I g90 Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application. for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
r,ecde3 to comple*.s the Checklist .should be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
Date Received: `I- 7- am 5
City Receipt #:_ 2 'Z3W
Critical Areas File #: 1�Dp5 - o 151
Critical Areas Checklist Fee:_ $135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant:
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant. shall include other pertinent
information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in . whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authorized to le this p 'cation on the behalf of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE (�c�?
Property Owner's Authorization
By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
Owner/Applicant:
Name,
Street Address y
1tZ
City State Zip
Telephoner . �� c� GJ(10
Email address (optional):
DATE � �✓ D
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address /
City State Zip
Telephone: z1_ 2 c
Email Address (optional): en' C Ceb'
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location: 1146 7t' Avenue South Tax Acct. Number: 00619400800400
Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-2005-0151
Applicant: Lee & Ginger Coward Owner: Eric Gedney
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-2005-0151)
During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain or be
adjacent to critical areas, including a Wetland and Erosion Hazard Areas pursuant to Chapter
23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Critical Areas maps indicated
"water environment" in the vicinity of the back yard and the LIDAR map indicated erosion
potential. Through field reconnaissance, it was determined that the site is on or adjacent to an
erosion hazard area (slope of 15% or greater) and the potential for wetlands exists on or
adjacent to the property (the soil in the back yard was very wet and plants that thrive in a wet
environment were present).
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject
property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any
potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development
proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a
mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and
delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to
complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific
development application.
• Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are
listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of
critical areas (see below).
• Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined
in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an
approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning
Division for more information.
• General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110
through 23.40.140.
REPORT REQUIREMENTS — WETLANDS
The :site investigation has shown that the site may contain a wetland. Wetlands are areas
inundated or saturated by ground or surface water that support, under normal circumstances,
vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil.
• Wetlands are generally rated according to their size, condition, function, and vegetation
types into four (4) different categories described in ECDC 23.50.010 and by use of the "City
of Edmonds Wetland Field Data Form" by the critical areas consultant.
• Buffer widths for wetlands vary depending on the category of the wetland as listed in ECDC
23.50.040. F.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, there
are specific Critical Areas report requirements for wetlands that are provided in ECDC
23.50.030.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH WETLANDS
Development proposals that encroach into wetlands or their buffers or building setbacks may be
allowed through the approval of certain processes.
• The width of a wetland buffer may be reduced through buffer enhancement if the criteria
described in ECDC 23.50.040.F.3 can be met. The maximum amount that a buffer can be
reduced through buffer enhancement is 50%.
• A buffer may also be modified through a process called buffer averaging. The criteria
applied to buffer averaging are listed in ECDC 23.50.040.F.4. The maximum amount that
the buffer width can be reduced at any single location through buffer averaging is 50%.
• Development proposals that proposed encroachments into buffers beyond what is allowed
through the above methods require a Critical Areas Variance, or a Reasonable Use
Exception. If you think that you have a proposal that may require one of these processes,
please contact a Planner for more information.
• Any time a development proposal requires an alteration to a wetland, a mitigation plan is
required as part of the Critical Areas report. In addition to the General Mitigation
requirements referenced above, mitigation requirements specific to wetlands are provided in
ECDC 23.50.050.
• NOTE: There are specific performance standards for the subdivision of lands in wetlands
and wetland buffers. These are listed in ECDC 23.50.060.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area.
• Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or
greater. among others.
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A.
• In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific
Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the
Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area.
• Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer or other qualified professional.
• Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070.
%1
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If
you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed
activity, please contact a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC
23.4-0.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a
Planner for more information.
Gina Coccia Planner r'I/Vl/b► l� October 25, 2005
Name, Title U Signature Date
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on
the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
3
PLANNING DATA
+ STREET FILE
I
Name: Let, (,hoer Coward
Date: p31 yq / 2,00(p
Site Address: j L. (# +TH *ve,
Plan Check #: 0(p • 09 Z-
ProjectDescription: 5etVnd CI1 YY Ac#df-h'M + N•tW b1arQ9e /MLudmvM
Reduced Site Plan Provided: ES NO)
Zoning: 1Z. S — (p
Map Page: 4 57j
Corner Lot: (YES /®O
Flag Lot: (YES /®O
Critical Areas Determination #: Zoo 5 -. o , c I it Npn_weu
® Study Required pOygi blc w"and in lop u4&a rd ? ywaiwi i
❑ Waiver Sr (oylnte� 'Q, { • l V 0
SEPA Determination: -g4?ht
❑ Weeded (for 500 cubic yards of grading or site within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger).
❑ Fee
❑ Checklist
❑ APO List with notarized form
Exempt < 60 CAA 10 VC, a rd S Df 0 r"a d I•r)
' �`' • 'Re7ued-Setback.�-
Street- o
Side:
S : �•
R`eNar. , 5
A, 6tdW'Setbadks
Stet:
Side* $,
SicdJe: 6
Rehr: 5
❑ Detached Structures: \ N 0N,G 5 0 O Wh
❑ Rockeries: /
®(;Fences rellises: Q,►)(j rl11h9
❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: NOV1� SVIOWY1 . L �}', (hto
® Stairs eck: New + �X1-,-5- — tML-cSeib a c*-S 4-.-O b
Parking Required: 2
Parking Provided: ?. B• 43v« hu'�
Lot Area: 10 0 l 2.s 91
Lot Coverage: 3 3
Lot Coverage Calculations: 8�a �' 611 Z*tiLIG s 3 31 0
.'00difig Hei ht
Datum Point: e( • 9 a b VOIlvQ-
Datum Elevation: 100. 0
Maximum Height: 2.5 I C 11,11;. 1 It
Actual Height:4 2,15 � � 1;-4 .94 1'yZ, 14
ADU Created: (YES / NO �6T o e/Y� I Y1 10 a 51"al� OV% AEU
YK,(,�srt�.0 G(. a
Subdivision: LDi' F71 DCV- 8 yt ey,+ is F-f,r&A' Add1•+i OVI (-I'- Z00(v 04.10.01741,g
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES 6p
A� A: 95.83- I v2•y �VIAX
5
U ru d C.: 9 9-13 Q ti'�'UI A (= (ti2 • I'f
D` 92. 2(0
A,1 Sg . v
Plan Review By: •: G i to a COcCia, :• 0' (01•41
?i • Z
el.evufi on
Kfazan& ASSOCIATES,INC,
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
LIMITED GEOLOGIC HAZARDS EVALUATION AND
WETLAND DELINEATION / ANALYSIS REPORT
1146 — 7th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington
Krazan Project Number 094-06006
Prepared for:
Mrs. Ginger Coward
Proposed Additions to Existing Single Family Residence
Coward Property
Edmonds, Washington
Prepared by:
Krazan & Associates, Inc.
19501 144th Ave. NE
Suite F-300
Woodinville, WA 98072
425-485-5519
March 6, 2006 STREET FILE
RECEIVED
MAR 15 2006
PERMIT COUNTER
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C 9 Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................... 3
SITEBACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................3
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................3
MITIGATION METHODS..............................................................................................................................4
WETLANDANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................4
WETLANDDELINEATION...........................................................................................................................5
LIMITATIONS...............................................................................................................................................5
ATTACHMENTA FIGURES........................................................................................................................8
ATTACHMENT B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG................................................................................................12
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
• • Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.3
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the request and authorization received from Mrs. Ginger Coward, Krazan &
Associates, Inc. completed a Limited Geologic Hazards Evaluation and a Wetland Delineation/ Analysis
Report for the Coward property located at 1146 — 7th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington (see Figure
1, Attachment A). To make these investigations more cost effective, the limited geologic investigation
was conducted first to determine if there are geologic hazards present. The wetland delineation/analysis
was performed to determine if there is a perennial wetland environment located on the property.
SITE BACKGROUND
The site is located in the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, of the
Willamette Meridian. Site improvements include a bi-level residence, detached two car garage and
fenced yard with landscaping. Rain gutters were observed on the residence and garage; however, the
down spouts discharge directly to the ground, increasing the saturation of soils in the vicinity of the
discharge points. The proposed additions to the single family residence on the property include 'an
expanded garage and a new deck area (see Figure 2, Attachment A). Existing development surrounding
the subject property consists of single family residential housing.
The western third of the property slopes downward to the northwest at a gradient of approximately 30 to
60 percent. This area is vegetated with brush, grasses, native plants, and blackberries. The rest of the site
is generally level and covered with lawn, moss, and small trees and shrubbery planted along the property
boundaries, structure boundaries, and walkways.
The Geologic Map of the Edmonds East Quadrangle and part of the Edmonds West Quadrangle,
Washington, indicate that the site is underlain by Vashon Glacial Till. The Vashon Glacial Till is
typically characterized by an unsorted, non -stratified mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and
boulders in variable quantities. The Vashon Glacial Till is typically dense to very dense and relatively
impermeable, and is typically underlain by Vashon Glacial Advance Outwash deposits at variable depths.
There is an east -west trending fault, part of the Seattle Fault System, present beneath Edmonds. This fault
is believed to be within 5 miles of the subject property and crosses the Puget Sound from Edmonds to the
Kitsap Peninsula; however, we were unable to locate additional information regarding the type and/or
depth of this fault.
According to the Snohomish County Soil Survey, the site is underlain by Everett gravely sandy loam
formed on terraces and glacial outwash planes with from 0 to 8 percent slopes. This soil type has rapid
permeability and is generally not hydric. However, wet spots can reportedly indicate hydric soils.
Embankment fills should not be made with this soil, and excavations over 4 feet deep in this soil
reportedly require shoring.
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ANALYSIS
Mr. Phil Haberman, a Krazan licensed geologists conducted the limited geologic hazard investigation at
the site on February 16, 2006. The site slopes appear to be stable at this time. No sloughing or
indications of past or present slope movement were observed on the property. Based on our knowledge
of the regional geology, as well as the observed slope conditions, in our professional opinion the site does
not have a severe erosion or landslide hazard, and the proposed construction should not have a negative
impact on the slope area or adjacent properties. Additions to the single family residence may be located
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite X • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.4
as proposed, provided adequate measures are taken to minimize erosion from slopes in the construction
area.
MITIGATION METHODS
The removal of native vegetation should be limited, to the greatest extent possible (outside areas
designated for landscaping and structural development) and landscaping and other permanent erosion
control features should be in place to reduce adverse impacts to neighboring and down slope properties,
resulting from erosion. Vegetation should not be removed from steeper slope areas without protection of
exposed soils.
Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands,
streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should
be taken and these measures should be in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements. As a
minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and
sediment control features of the site:
• Phase the grading; utility work, and other work requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site
soils to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). If precautions are
taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the
wet season (generally October through April), but it should also be known that this may increase
the overall cost of the project.
• All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible.
• Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the
possibility of sediment entering surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences
with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems.
• Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a
sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited other filtration methods will need to
be incorporated.
• A WSDOT certified Erosion Control Inspector should be assigned to this project to monitor
temporary erosion and sedimentation control devices, and make recommendations for ESC repair,
or additional ESC installation, if needed. Krazan & Associates, Inc. can provide a WSDOT
certified inspector, if requested.
Permanent erosion control features should be incorporated into the design of the addition, and should be
in place following completion of construction and prior to the subsequent wet weather season. All areas
stripped of vegetation should be re -planted with rapid growing species. If root systems will not be well
established before the onset of wet weather, placement of Jute Mat or geofabrics should be considered in
conjunction with re -planting.
WETLAND ANALYSIS
Mr. Steve Neugebauer, a Krazan Licensed Hydrogeologist, and Ms. Carlotta Cellucci, a Krazan
Professional Wetland Scientist, conducted a reconnaissance of the site on February 20, 2006. A
photographic log of the site reconnaissance is presented in Attachment B. Site observations initially
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite X • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 9 Fax: (360) 598-2127
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.5
indicated that the area at the northwest corner of the property was a potential wetland. The potential
wetland area was measured to cover approximately 3,375 square feet of 0.08 acres of the subject site (see
Figure 3, Attachment A). The slopes adjacent to the potential wetland area on the property were
measured and found to be between 30 degrees and 60 degrees. In addition, the associated soils appear to
be poorly drained. The potential wetland area was observed to drain from the northwest comer of the
subject property to a swale at the west side of the property north of the subject property. This drainage
continues north along the western property lines to a stormwater catch basin on Fir Street. A constant
stream of water was observed to be entering this catch basin. Recent rains have saturated the soils in the
area. So, the source of hydrology is likely precipitation and surface water runoff due to the surrounding
land use of residential lots and roadways, and the slow de -watering of surrounding poorly drained soils.
WETLAND DELINEATION
The Department of Ecology Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual
(Publication #96-94) was used to evaluate the potential wetland area. Based in the criteria presented in
this manual, the potential wetland was determined to be a non -wetland. According to the Ecology
manual, The following defmrtion, criteria, and technical approach comprise a guideline for the
identification and delineation of non -wetlands:
1) Definition. Non -wetlands include uplands and lowland areas that are neither deepwater aquatic
habitats, wetlands, nor other special aquatic sites. They are seldom or never inundated, or if
frequently inundated, they have saturated soils for only brief periods during the growing season,
and, if vegetated, they normally support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life only
in aerobic soil conditions.
2) Criteria. Non -wetlands meet the following criteria:
a. Vegetation. The prevalent vegetation consists of plant species that are typically adapted
for life only in aerobic soils. These mesophytic and/or xerophytic macrophytes cannot
persist in predominantly anaerobic soil conditions.
b. Soil. Soils, when present, are not classified as hydric, and possess characteristics
associated with aerobic conditions.
c. Hydrology. Although the soil may be inundated or saturated by surface water or ground
water periodically during the growing season of the prevalent vegetation, the average
annual duration of inundation or soil saturation does not preclude the occurrence of plant
species typically adapted for life in aerobic soil conditions.
3) Technical approach for the identification and delineation of non -wetlands. When any one of
the criteria identified in b above is present, the area is a non -wetland.
The potential wetland area on the property qualifies as a non -wetland based on both the Soil and
Hydrology criteria. The soils are not classified as hydric and possess characteristics of associated with
aerobic conditions, and the average annual duration of inundation or soil saturation does not preclude the
occurrence of plant species typically adapted for life in aerobic soil conditions.
LIMITATIONS
The Geologic Hazards Analysis and Wetland Delineation/Assessment performed by Krazan & Associates
were limited in nature. Subsurface drilling, sample collection, and sample analysis were not included in
the scope of this project. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.6
and methods, technical advances, new agency regulations, physical changes in the site either due to
excavation or fill placement, or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of
this report may require the report to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the owner should be
aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the
time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable
time for the usefulness of this report.
Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and
groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is
derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited evaluation
of subsurface conditions on the property. The findings presented in this report were based upon field
observations during single property visits conducted by both the wetland team and the licensed geologist
assessing geologic hazards, and review of available, reasonably ascertainable data. Observations describe
only the conditions present at the time of this investigation. The data reviewed and observations made are
limited to accessible areas and currently available data.
Our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of site conditions.
Actual site conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. The
findings, conclusions, and recommendations made in this report are based site reconnaissance, existing
technical documentation of the area, and best professional judgment. It is not warranted that such data
cannot be superseded by future environmental, regulatory, geologic, or technical developments.
The findings and conclusions of this report can also be affected by the passage of time. Seasonal weather
conditions; manmade influences, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; natural events such as
earthquakes and slope instability; and flooding, or groundwater fluctuations may affect the findings and
conclusions made in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during
construction, the Licensed Geologist should be notified so that he may review the report and
supplemental recommendations can be made, if warranted.
The conclusions of this report are based on the. information provided regarding the proposed construction.
If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report may not be valid.
The Licensed Geologist should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations can be reviewed
and reevaluated.
Misinterpretations of this report by other design team members can result in project delays and cost
overruns. These risks can be reduced by involving Krazan & Associates, Inc. in design teams meetings
and discussions after submittal of this report. Krazan & Associates, Inc. should also be retained for
reviewing pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications with regard to slope stability
and erosion control. Contractors can also misinterpret this report. To reduce this risk, Krazan &
Associates should also participate in pre -bid and preconstruction meetings. It may also be helpful for
Krazan & Associates to provide construction observation/oversight during the site work.
This report is a geologic hazards assessment and wetland delineation/assessment with the purpose of
evaluating the site for the presence of geologic hazards that may impact the proposed construction and the
presence of a jurisdictional wetland that may restrict design parameters. The scope of our services did not
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.7
include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic materials
in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or atmosphere of the subject property. Any statements or absence
of statements in this report regarding odors, unusual or suspicious items, or conditions observed are
strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential
hazardous and/or toxic assessments.
The information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation, utilizing standard industry
practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such
information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future developments. We emphasize that this
report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for any other site.
This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and shall be subject to
the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the client and Krazan. Any third party use of
this report, including use by Client's subcontractors, shall also be subject to the terms and conditions in
the contract between the client and Krazan governing the work. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or
release of the information contained in this report without the expressed written consent of Krazan is
strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Krazan.
Thank you for allowing Krazan to assist you with this project. If you have any questions, or if we can be
of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (425) 485-5519.
Respectfully submitted,
KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
IXJ 4LIV616�
Phil Haberman, LG
Senior Engineering Geologist
Steve Neugebauer
Licensed Hydrogeologist
LHG#: 347
Carlotta Cellucci
Professional Wetland Scientist
Senior Geologist
LG#: 2513
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.8
ATTACHMENT A
FIGURES
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite X • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 9 Fax: (360) 598-2127
lz:kt,
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
k
Page 40.9
7h�U
*777
L9
ILL
Kmz-an
Sits-, k'k-%v61RWal fAwncer.
With 0_%t-5 M &T Wfw"M US
Figure 1 - Site Location WSP
The Uward Property
I ' e 5 - 7th Avonve Scuth, EdmDr- ds. Wastd% tcn
a
094-M-5-1 I :
T-m- I OF 3
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C 9 Poulsbo, Washington 98370e (360) 598-2126 e Fax: (360) 598-2127
0
E
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.10
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.0 34 ►a
0 0.4 0.0 1.2 1.6 2 al V
M=10.261
G=0.461
���� VIM �.
Figure 2 -Site Topographic Map
The Coward Property
ails Wwtbpmtit Cugt --m
1146 - 7th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington
Withaffees in the Western US
tb7iorefe 48�'.55�3at1.rtoo
r9.9,1 frrrk,f•rvnaA'l. Srix M•A9l
SIZE
f5rIm NO
DM NO
[A.d..MM U A OW.' • W SI 05,SS) 9
094-OWS-2
SCALE
1 : 1
SHEET 2 OF 3
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 983709 (360) 598-2126 9 Fax: (360) 598-2127
0 I
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
PanNoll
Le
:W3. MR
04
04
ALLEr
J
z-
Y
I
C, I
i
S/
9 � f 1'
1
—
70
122
I A
—ac
of 0
ab tm W
,%waxirme i"cm of nmp ptLcec ejui;
(D
quo Kra mm
CLA Ro-:l
C—rd�=,.WA
1-k
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C * Poulsbo, Washington 98370* (360) 598-2126 * Fax: (360) 598-2127
0
E
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.12
ATTACHMENT B
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 9837N (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
MO
Aerobic Vegetation - Looking North West
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.13
Photo Block - Attachment B
Sav The Coward Properly
k'rthuJ/irrsinlhr 45'r�trrnl:ti 1146 - 7th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington
094-0606.4
M
1 OP 3
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 9 Fax: (360) 598-2127
• Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.14
Flags Marking Initial Boundaries - Looking South
Standing Water - Looking West
aitc, ��t IuPun is lu�tiin_c n
With a,07m in the Western IN
t.orJv rOlmSSojou2W
M01 Ojlk'hr ",'C. Ulm tR4119
n'-d,'.0e. Ail 9i7?_ . ia: V 05,SS)9
Photo Block - Attachment B
The Coward Property
1146 - 7th Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington
SCALE 1 ; 1
094-0606.5
20F3
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C • Poulsbo, Washington 98370• (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
!
Coward Property
KA No. 094-06006
March 6, 2006
Page No.15
t,
l x
ti
aP s k
�
f:
d
Flags Marking Initial Boundaries - Looking
North
4�
Garage to be Remodeled - Looking East
K an
Photo
Block - Attachment B
1N� lle%t:htjuiWlu bWj1f^vr.
The Coward Property
k'itl+��I/x'+x in thr lti.�t� rn 7 :�
1146 - 7th Avenue
South, Edmonds. Washington
0i)4-0606.E
0
WAIF
SHFF f 3
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Hwy. 305 N.E. Suite 3C 9 Poulsbo, Washington 9837N (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
r04-10-'06 11:20 FROM- T-234 P002/003 F-422
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION
April 10, 2006
KA No. 094-06006
Ms. Gina Coecia, Planner S"A"IFREET FIL."
Development Services Permit Coordinator
Citv of Edmonds
121 51h Ave. North
Edmonds, WA 98020
APR 10 li,.'Q6
RE: Plan Review Comments
eultplN(a � .
Lee & Linda Coward Project
CITY OF ED A 71V
NDS
1146 7`h Ave. South
Edmonds, Washington
Dear Ms.Coccia,
Krazan and Associates received your Plan Review Comments for the Coward Addition Remodel, dated
March 30, 2006. We would like to respond specifically to item number 3, Critical Areas Report.
Unfortunately, I was not able to contact you via telephone, so I thought it best to provide a written
response.
First, we are aware of the requirements of the Edmond's Community Development Code, Chapter 23.40
and 23.50, and for this project we used Ecology's "Washington State Wetlands Delineation Manual",
199'7 for the delineation procedures and methods to follow. We also used Ecology's "Washington State
Wetland Rating System for Western Washington.
Kra.zan's team of wetland specialists visited the Coward property and found an overgrown basin area in
the backyard. Most of the overgrowth observed was composed of sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgate) and
Himalayan blackberry (Rebus discolor), which were determined to be the dominant plant species. These
species are not representative of wetland vegetation. Of all of the plant species identified during the
investigation, FAC+ and FACU plants were the most prevalent. There were no OBL, or FACW plants
observed at the time of the investigation.
We also investigated the hydrology at the site and did not find that wetland hydrology was present at that
time. The months of December through February were record breaking months for rain. Due to the steep
slope of the backyard grading to a less sloped area, excess drainage from the backyard will cause some
surlf-icial ponding in areas where the slope is minimal. Near surface soils at the site are derived from
glacial till and have low permeability. The small areas of ponded water observed, appear to be areas that
accumulate rain water, irrigation water, and act as drainage points for upgradient soils that have been
saturated by heavy rains. These areas most likely pond each time a significant rain occurs, and are
located in the direction of surface water runoff. This is not typical of wetland hydrology.
The Krazan team did `collect" soil samples for evaluation in the field. Soil was excavated in two separate
areas to a depth of 12" — 18" below ground surface (bgs). The soil within each excavation was visually
inspected and characterized in the field by a Washington State licensed geologist to determine soil type,
soil color, water content, and to determine if anaerobic conditions existed. The following table
summarizes the field findings of these two "samples".
With Offices Serving The Western United States
20714 State Highway 305 Suits 3 C • Poulsbo WA 98370 • (360) 598-2126 • Fax: (360) 598-2127
Beeor: Unknown witeh nrgumeni.
'' 04-10-'06 11:20 FROM- T-234 P003/003 F-422
KA No. 094-06006
Page No. 2
Observations
Soil Sam le 1
Soil Sample 2
Soil Horizons
A/B
AB
Signs of Anaerobic Environment?
No
No
HZS Odor.)
No
No
Degree of Saturation
Moist — 30%
Moist — 35%
Munsell chart chroma
5 YR 3/3/3
5 YR 313/3
Texture
Gravelly Loam/gravelly sandy
Gravelly Loam/gravelly sandy
loam
loam
Hydric?
LNo
No 7j
The soils observed in each excavation were similar in appearance and characteristics; grass was growing
on the surface, A soil horizons to approx. 2" BGS, and B to the bottom of the excavation. The A horizon
has, lots of viable roots, darker reddish brown with organie components and some silt and fine sand. The
soil columns observed were not characteristic of hydric soils. In addition, the soils on the site were
mapped as Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam in the Snohomish County Soil Survey. The soils observed
onsite corresponded to the description of Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam in the soil survey. In addition,
Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam is not listed as a hydric soil on the "Hydric Soils of Washington" list.
Based on the findings summarized above, Krazan & Associates wetland specialists concluded that the wet
area on the property did not qualify as a wetland, and did meet the criteria for a non -wetland. If you have
any further questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me in our
Poulsbo office at (360) 598-2126, on my cellular telephone at (360)340-1947, or by e-mail at
car•lottacellucci@krazan.com.
Sincerely,
K.RAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Carlotta Cellucci, L.G.
Senior Environmental Geologist
Pacific Northwest Division
Krazan & Associates, Inc.
Offices Serving The Western United States
The City of Edmonds Sidi Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO. .........................
1.07-001.45 NEW CONSTRUCTION ElREPAIRS rJ LID NO ................... ASMT. INTO...................
OWNER------- ham 11 aAlu---- ...... =------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT NO. ....................
JOB ADDRESS ------ i1�±.6...�---'ji'H---�w a:ivtll .,�:�t-mjj-------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO....................................... BLOCK NO. ....................................
...................................................... -........................
NAME OF ADDITION ....................................
W
rvv TESTER ON SEI,'ER
Approved:
PWVV-0001-11/75 tREV.11178) DATE ............................................ By----------------------------------•-------------------------
7TH AVE S
DOOR
Lol
:KYARD
NYE 6" C/O @ GRADE
XISTING 4" CONC.
CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS- BUILT
ADDRESSi PERMIT
1146 7TH AVE S NO.
C❑NTRACT❑Ri H❑ME❑WNERi
XXXXX COWARD
DATE INSPECTEDi INSPECTED BYj DATE DRAWNi
08-21-2006 J H 08-08-07
ENG20060261
SCALEi
NTS
DRAWN BY,
J.TRIEU
r
N14111111
Yln�lu'I�I�II�'I�IIYIIV�V�U�INV
STATEMENT ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Property Address: j i *& 777""AYe. 5oo;�
Edmonds, Washington
Assessor's Parcel Number:
[ have read the requirements for accessory dwelling units contained in Chapter 20.21 of
-the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and understand that an accessory
dwelling unit as defined in ECDC Section 21.05.015 is prohibited until an Accessory
:Dwelling Unit Permit is approved.
11 also understand that an Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit cannot be approved unless all
ithe criteria in Chapter 20.21 are met, and all the necessary items are submitted,
including an affidavit of occupancy and a covenant to be filed with the Snohomish
County regarding the regulations imposed on Accessory Dwelling Units.
]Property Owner Signature:
]Property Owner Name (prin4."1 Y-,A i)o
Date:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that yr ✓z- l'occ L (feVad
signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/Ue free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in this instrument.
Nota iLure seals must be smudged. Dated: �j,�r,`% (�y, Oa
.A F• NpG Signature of
#pTAO
. I
••.«...
Cf WASH���
THIS
Notary Public:�`�;�/j�"
Residing at:�
My Appointmen
Expires:
MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR.
A DUstatement. doc
a
9
o& -ova.
&)ZvA-1e6
Abol,e&-ne-)
Sr(-,VrUI
x
$459 9YO59 88.59
CORNER (]l2] <]14] 0161
INACCES5IELE FENCE
REAR YARD /
T5ACK 1 I
Y:.:..,,.f.;.....:.:::.:.:...;.:.:. AREA DETERMINED TO
_ ':. 1T.
;....;.::::;:::::: BE NON -WETLAND BY
Q::;•:1;.:.:;<.;:: KRAZAN 4 Assoc., INC.
SEE S :::: •.:..:..... ..., . .. EPARATE REPORT
Ai
CORNER
INACCE5515LE
t
EX5T, FENCE TO W51a 92.59
REMAIN 9181
9201
TEMP. ER05101,.GONTROL 20' 30
51LT FENCE /
FRONT YARD
5ET5AGK
I
MA
e
'• ' -
►�f.R�ri7�1���Ti
42
EX15TING
RESIDENCE
188E 6F
1*IA1N FUR
EL.= I00.95'
14'-4" -B4 59
t 922]
POINT A
EL: 98.82'
� J
IDf_4
r EX5T. _9
•w IRRIGATION \
1
I VALVE
I COVER
TOP RIDCxE '` I U r 9241
EL: 122,14' I EX5T. Z
WATER o
METER I
o X
w _ �
SS I SS I SS SS I i
o NEW \ PROP05ED
'
-
i
RIV
D EWAY
D AD ITION
CUR5GUT
/
�-
T EX ENT OFEX5T,
•I
Jz
I
.h
CUR G 5 UT
..-
98 .59
2l
pT
05
TEMP. R E E 'ION . CONT
L 1 T FENCE E
I
UCC U1�•
I
,i
:IJ
I
P DINT G
a'
I
�� / _ •.n'.F•'.�'S ;.•.••ZV.'•.•"-J.'.A''+'�t.•'\•ti�...•i M=�•. ,. �,ti: •.•L-,I:-.•:'tY+'•.: 'ti';..•,,.`_}.� A•+•''1•
Ul
LLI
98.59 101� 59 102.59 EX5T.
FENCE 13�.0 POINTS HONE - TELEPHONE EL: 9-i.31' 0261 92$] 9301 EL.=101,4b' POLE
F:�' 10, 2 0'
SITE PLAN NOTES;
A OV-1 140117r�
1. TOPOGR41-141 LOCATION OF HOUSE AND
APPROVED BY PLANNING
PROPERTr LINES WERE INCORPORATED FROM A 09. ��. ��
SURVEY 5'J' FOX � DOB55 SURVEYORS DATED
ID-20-2005
BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION:
peer VwAtiaM V-&po0G!
- - - PO1NT A
- POINT B = 101.50'
Q �j l t� (p (d (p 0 t 0 i 0i0
-POINT C=1313.13'
-POINT = 32.26_'
N04- ah APIA
AVERAGE GRADE = 3aa.8/4 = 9720'
MAXIMUM HEIGHT = 122.20'
�jj0 n (0 n l O 0 59 S
ACTUAL HEGHT =122.1
,4LL AIRE,4e
Floor
Rm. No.
Room Name
Area (eF)
Easement
001
Family Room
39112
Basement
002
Kitchenette
9rro.2$
Easement
003
Studio
340,21
Easement
004
Stair {-fall
ro-1.32
Easement
005
5ath 4
.59.12
Easement
00ro
5torage
199.0E
1,189.01
First Floor
101
Entry
19-1.49
First Floor
102
Living Room
2roro.1e>B
First Floor
103
Eating Area
182.45
First Floor
104
Kitchen
192.50
First Floor
105
Mud Room
158.14
First Floor
IOro
5edroom 1
143.52
First Floor
10-1
5ath 1
50.59
First Floor
IO8
5edroom 2
124.14
1,31'1.04
Second Floor
201
Upper Hall
1ro7.21
5econd Floor
202
M 5edroom 3
301.80
5econd Floor
203
M 5ath 2
5econd Floor
204
5edroom 4
112.-f9
5econd Floor
20$
5edroom 8
153.40
5econd Floor
206
5ath 3
84,30
5econd Floor
201
Laundry
54.08
1,Iroon5
First Floor
D-1 IDeck
1
329.29
First Floor
D-2
New Deck 2
21140
54ro.69
4,2 3.5E
arc' eA & poam YVl a y pvv j c-W u p to 4' vvn+v
If 4 30•1 above t3o ukvl A 4:1
GFENERAL NOTES: lA h W V e lr�d� C 6•0 (, 1 to . Vo. 0 40 • L
I. ALL WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS AMENDED
BY LOCAL JURSIDICTION, THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE,
NOATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE ANS WA STATE DEPT. OF LABOR AND
INDUSTRIES REGULATIONS
2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL
EXISTING AND NEW SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE AND DURING
CONSTRUCTION AND INFORM THE ARCHITECT OF VARIATIONS
BETWEEN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS.
3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE.
4, DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE OR MASONRY,
FACE OF FRAMING MATERIAL OR CENTERLINE OF POSTS OR
INTERIOR PARTITIONS UNLESS OTHERW15E NOTED.
5. VERTICAL DIMENSIONS ARE TO TOP OF 5U5FLOOR AND TOP OF
PLATES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
ro. DOORS ARE DIMENSIONED TO PANEL SIZE AND WINDOWS ARE
DIMENSIONED TO OUTSIDE OF FRAME, U.N.O. CONTRACTOR IS
RESPONSIBLE TO CALCULATE NET SIZES BEFORE FRAMING AND
ORDERING,
7 CONTRACTOR TO UNDERSTAND AND ACCOMMODATE FOR ALL
IMPLICATIONS OF GALVANIC REACTION BETWEEN PRESSURE
TREATED MATERIALS AND ASSOCIATED CONNECTORS TO AVOID
CORROSION,
Anne R- S- Ctarner'll�
Ubakfi R aired
Front
Sides NI y-----`�.�.
Rear W (i5 _ 5
Other _
He--- 22 5"
�i
ol
V •
I
EX5T. S lU E ER
MAN
HOL>=
EXe T. GA 5
COVER O ER
4-VALVE
DATUM=100. O
GOVER �--
._
I
• l0 _._• 0.59
ns 2]
_ I
RO L� POSED
CUR5CUT
_ 102.59
4
_'C130]
EXTENT OF EX5T,
CORNER CUREGUT
EL: 101.93' TOPO
ELEVATIONS
TO DATUM
NORTH ITRUi= I=LEVI
"Nothing in this permit approval process shall be
PROPERTY OWNERS.- interpreted as allowing or permitting the
maintenance of any currvctly existing illegal,
LEE 4 GINGER COWARD nonconforming or unpermitted building, structure
or site condition which is outside the scope of the
C�'C?1�1T,4CT PARSON: rmit application, regardless of whether such
building; structure ur cundiciun is shown on the
ERIC GEDNEY I ARCHITECT
ERIC - ENE site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or
condition may be the subject of a separate
enforcement action."
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 4, SLOG 0, YOST'S FIRST ADD, TO EDMONDS, EXC N 45 FT
THEREOF PLUS PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY.
LOTINFORMATION:
ATION:
PARCEL # 00619400500400
ZONING RS-ro
LOT SIZE: 10,12E SF
MAX. LOT COVERAGE: 35% OF 10,125 SF = 3544 SF
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 2e25 SF
IMPF-RVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION:
EXISTING HOUSE (PRE-Ie-T-U 1254 SF
EXISTING DRIVEWAY (PRE-19T) 355 SF
TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1672 SF
PROPOSED HOUSE ADDITIONAL COVERAGE: 265 SF
PROPOSED GARAGE COVERAGE: 1011 SF
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ADDITIONAL COVERAGE: 99 SF
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 13.75 SF
GLAZING CALCULATION
GLAZING IN WINDOWS 562 SF
GLAZING IN DOORS 60 SF
TOTAL GLAZING 622 SF
TOTAL HEATED AREA 3667 SF
GLAZING AREA - io OF FLOOR AREA 17,051.
OPTION III FOR GROUP R-1 OCCUPANCY CHOSEN - GAS HEAT
LIST OF DRAWINGS
A-101 SITE PLAN, PROJECT INFO,
A-102 DEMOLITION PLANS
A-103 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
A-104 STRUCTURAL DETAILS
A-105 FOUNDATION PLAN, STRUCTURAL NOTES
A-106 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN, DETAILS
A-107 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN, DETAILS
A-105 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
A-109 BASEMENT PLAN
A-110 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A-111 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A-202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AUG 2 2 2006
A-301 BUILDING 4 WALL SECTION
A-302 BUILDING SECTIONS WILDING
� oDEPARTMENT
MD
1�k �1107'--f
,51-FE- A�%1J
RME�npall(- W.
Alul G) 2 2 2 0 ru'G
DIJILDING DEPAPMOMT
CrTY OF EDMONDS
m
•
66-09;-)
a JAA Fj)
114b--70NI5 I
5Ui2V Ec1 I