Loading...
117 9TH AVE S (2).pdfOpp, ari�h Y ;r v t w icl4h CITY OF EDMONDS FILE # - L0 ' 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FEE $25.00 REVT J HEARING DATE: APPt.ICAI-IT: MRS EDNA ANDERSON ADDRESS_216 Sunset. F.,�monds.mg[JOIIE: 778—A713 Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Fee Simple OWNER: "EDNA ANDERSON ADDRESS: AS ABOVE PHONE: i LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) 117-9th Ave. South Edmonds Wash. i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lots 37 38 39 & 40 Blodk 68 Plat of Citv of Edmonds. USE ZONE: RS-r) ZONING ORDINIANCE REQUIREMENJT: VARIANCE REQUESTED: I LEGAL DESCRIPTION! CIIEC'ED & '%FFKUVti By Planning Department ;rip - - STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA i t s ATTACHED: 0 the 0t�es—COM . 9 I' ' the other, a o lqinn r: a good man I wherein the lots could be sub���*iap�a in kPe�in built, instead of along with platted lot lines e STATE OF WASHINGTOPJ) Owner or Rep esent ive ;f ss. Signature of 4oplica t, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notar;/ Public in and for ' e tate of ,who, Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally anpeared� _ being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)li8 hsscprepared therend indareetruee going statements ed a and has acknowledged to me that, the recitation and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes 'therein mentioned. _ Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,-' tdaY off" • 19-j 1 _ � '•at� t.. -• flotary �:`� 1 i c i n a111 �'rj�esiding ate of Washington. MM ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under the identical zone classification. a 0WVAr.,.e ; POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel- fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in which my property is located because: .0"if !, POINT 3. If'this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue to the owner of this property, the cause pf which is. beyond his control because:, v POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by -the granting of this variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in- consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which T am lorated_ I Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of �Z✓ , File No. -77 request for vari an a at the following: 1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are In the file. 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met. 3. In addition thereto, f 4. Therefore, the request for variance is/Granted, subject to he following special conditions: 5. Section 12.16.110 "----and if a building permit and/or occupancy F rmit is not obtained TOT i.he subject -iroperty within one year from the date of the Board's decision, the con ditional use permit or.yariance shall be automatically null and vo d.---" 6. Decision shall be effective on: Uatc - DATED:�nr� A n Chairman, Board of jus DATA Date of Application: ���'77 Date of (fearing: Date of Publication: 7 ' - 7 7 Continuances: Date of Posting: Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board: ecretary, Board of �djus tmen y rn i .; w ., yw �lti S� f Cr +R7�� 't�'C ? ,tf �1 . _ , n furthor, that a1.1 rout:iguous property which 1 own, which has not received a previous subdivision approval., is included herein. I understand that street dedications may be required in conformance with the Official. Street flan of the City of Edmonds. r i Property Gamer b 4 7) SKETCH: Show below or attach a sketch of *the proposed subdivision drawn to scale similar to the example shown on the reverse side. On subdivisions, where possible, indicate loca- tion of existing; septic tanks and drain .fields.. Include vicinity sketch of the area per example shot -in on the reverse side. If sketches are attached, On subdivisions, attach a statement of reasons why property, is such as topography, or.any other pertinent information not apparent please submit six copies. divided in the manner shown, on the sketch. `,.. Aj G•,� oo h :I ts. i CHESTER R. BENNETT - i Arrowxsr Ar LAw 115 Fovwra Arsxvs 80. PRowneot 0"0139 EowoxOs, WAnxtrroanx 08020 i 000/01 sew i. i . NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE-►�VXX�� BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I. All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the 16th day of March 19» , has been set as the date for hearing petition filed by Edna Anderson for a variance - x)01)dWxxMaxxt xxpemAdx on two lots -of 5' ' from 1 required 60' lot width at 117-9th Avenue South said property being zoned RS-6 ' �dc�d�ega���xxbe�cr��edc�ec�cx�c and legally described as -follows: Lots 37, 38, 39 & 40, Block 68, P1at of City of Edmonds. Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds ?, FILE NO: V-10-77 PUBLISH: 3-2-77 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH THOMAS J. COAD, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is the Publisher of the EDMONDS TRIBUNE -REVIEW, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and has been designated -as such by Court Order No. 38282, and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications herein- after referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, and that it was of general circulation in said Snohomish County That the annexed is a true copy of a _ Notice of Hearing Petition File #V.10-77 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said news- paper once each week for a period of one X0tXfiC=bM week/ commencing on the 2nd day of - Ma re. h 19717 and ending on the day of 19 —, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2�.1') 0 , which amount has been paid in full, at the rate of $ 2.00 a hundred words for the first insertion and $ a hundred words for each subsequent insertion Subscribed and sworn to before me thisl?�day of March 19779 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds, Wash. Em NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO'ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE .................. ... !�� .... ............... AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR. .............. .�.� ..... T..... &j/.D r, tv......................... . .............................................................................. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS:. / 7's..4.,�=.7W........ ........... .............................. ........... ............. ... ............................................................................. ZONE CLASSIFICATION: ... ............................... .......... . TIME & DATE OF'HEARING... TIME DAY DATE THE MEETING'WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 5th AVENUE AN-D BELL STREET. ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN'THIS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. COMMENTS CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE MEETING, IN PERSON OR. IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE. FILE NO... 1 --/0 .7.7 ... PUBLISHED... '"" ® 72 .... The removal, mutilation, destruction, or concealment , of this notice is a WARM"S I ® misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. i l FILE NO. APPLICANT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH � 3 being first duly sworn, c on oath deposes a says: That on the _day of 19 1 the attached Notice of Public Hearina was uosted as prescribed by Ordinance. Notary PVOic in and , vl;r= Washingt n residing t PLANNER'S VARIAi10E REVIEW FORM FILE # J j APPLICANT: E DNN M pE1?_S0M ADDRESS: - ZONING: VARIANCE REQUESTED:_ e� . ZONING CODE REQUIREt1ENT: OTiIER PERTTNEENJ,,�FCTS VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100 1. Does this amount to a rezone? 2.(a) Are there conditions and/or r lands in the same district?�1 k pplicable to other wouia strict enforcement of the .zoning code deprive -the pr commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? 3. Do th 4. Are there"unnecessary hardships and practical d to carry out the provisions of the zoning code"? 5. 'Wi 1 l the granting of thL vuri ance b of property owners -in the vicinity? r of rights 6. Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land? 71 7. Hill the grant'ng of the va i'Wi e der.er•al�ly�b�e�it1 harmony ,,.nd com-p0a-tiib�l,e with this :? 0 n i 11 C 0 d e? � I le!�I iS!�'L/ cow-D .U44� ? Ln- 1tWo--t..�( Planner's Variance Review 11/76 -.� - :r'J;•'-_ F -�xx �-wr '•Sti`µa+- •+ fi: 1. "�i� _ �. n �-\;. v 'X� 1 Ar1Gy f $..i i61t! J _ M 9CDIP' E�irax�� l- i Lts• l., • _ _ S Or xsraia.to.: _ - qo �' �.. . .. K wry t - _ - _ s'. .. - • . ��w.�:. "--ems.,._ __ .�...•.... .. ... >a .zv-:::�.r:.,��_,��s Yvsu:s-��wx�-ss.�-e..:�•x:.`.�'ts �5p-.�. fir. c�Rwy"=A,=h'9[z'�4,'-iz36FR�m•'�tL�[+`=�hm,>2Y"irK3a",ris`+diF'a.'A:4z.$.,v'U•A'„i�"�3;`••�HI".••..s"'`ai.T>.' ..,�,"". �%iXP,..: %'.�3Y?t=..'F.+>?l: X Ss w„G:'t«r:-'k'Y.a r'.::...r-$�•..,:e„� CITY of E®MONDS Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 s '_+ DATE: March , 281977 • 4 is ' .• TO: , N Edna Anderson �t 216 Sunset Edmonds, WA 98020 x TRANSMITTING: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES RE V-10-77 AS YOU REQUESTED: f FOR YOUR INFORMATION:. X .AS WE DISCUSSED: FOR APPROVAL: is FOR YOUR FILE: X REVIEW AND COMMENT: COMMENT AND RETURN: :. MINUTES OF MEETING: 1=16-77 REMARKS: CITY OF EDNOINDS PLANNING DEPARTIlE1 T• A .. Following the recess, City Attorney John Wallace reviewed for the Board the functions and role of the Board of Adjustment and also the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine. V-10-77 ' EDNA ANDERSON - Variance of 5' from required 60' lot width on two lots at-117 - 9th Ave S. (RS-6) Mrs. Block indicated this variance was in conjunction with a subdivision approved in 1969. It had been approved subject to granting of a variance for a lot width requirement on the two lots. There are two existing houses which are quite old on the lots. Each lot is 6,600 sq. ft., 600 sq. ft. over the minimum requirement, so this is not a rezone. Mrs. Block reviewed the criteria for a variance and noted that the two existing houses were built prior to adoption of the City Subdivision Code. She found the criteria to be met and recommended approval. The public portion of the hearing was then opened. Chet Bennett of 843 Bell St. represented Mrs. Anderson. Her daughter was also present to answer any questions. Mr. Bennett said the subdivision was approved in 1969 and Mrs. Anderson thought that was all that was necessary. She sold the third lot involved in the subdivision and now desired to sell one of the remaining two lots. When Mr. Bennett looked into it he found it had not been followed through for the variance. He said they only wanted to make this conform to what it should have been. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Mr. Roy said he is well acquainted with the property and that he could not see anything harmful or detrimental in this. MRS. -STOLE MOVED SECONDED BY,,MR., RO.Y; THAT- V=10=77 BE" APPROVED BECAUSE IT -DOES : NOT; ALTER THE LOT: Slit ..: AND ; I..T: PUTS .USE <OF EXISTING PROPERTY TO BETTER, ADVANTAGE, .AND,.BECAUSE IS IT .NOT.DETRIMCNTAL TO; THE NEIGHBORHOOD MOTION CARRIED. ' V-11-77 OLA GROSET Variance of 10' from required 25' front yard setback for. garage at Lot 18, Maplewood Village (RS-12) Mr. Hovde asked to be excused from this hearing as he is a personal friend of the applicant. He left the rostrum but did not leave the Council Chambers. Mrs. Block displayed the site plan and also showed slides of the area. She said the applicant wanted to place a garage at the top of a slope, and the consideration was topography, rather than size or space of lot. She said it would not amount to a rezone and the grade was very steep (16%) with a relatively level section just west of the street. She said strict enforcement of the Code would not allow a driveway grade of more than 1410. She said the height restriction on the accessory buildings is 15' which should not interfere with the views from across the street where the houses are on the uphill side. firs. Block felt that granting of this variance would be compatible with intent of the Code, and she recommended approval. The public portion of the hearing was then opened. Robert Boyd of 1231 Vista Way said his concern was not with the house but he inquired about height restrictions and how the height of the house is determined. City Attorney John Wallace explained that the current Code requires that it be determined by the average of the four building corners. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Mr. Roy stated that he thought this was as good a way to use the property as is possible. Mrs. Stole indicated she thought it could have been designed without going into the setback but, under the circumstances, it was probably acceptable. Mr. Roy added that this is a very difficult lot and lie has had experience building on such a grade. Ike said a steeper driveway than is needed is a hazard and from the safety standpoint the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 5 - March 16, 1977