Loading...
1214 11TH PL N.PDFlill iiiiii 579 1214 11 TH PL N ADDRES TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 00 ca066 0000160 Q BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DISCRETIONARY PERMIT IPS: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATE] EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE S: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S)#: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LID #: LATEM P\DSTs\Forms\,Street File Checklist.doc :Whdii► .� . , y SE RMIT CITY OF EDmolfbs ZONE ks JMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) joe ADDRESS / / L jh p /, /v Woodcraft Homes 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO, LID NO. ZMAILING ADDRESS Q 7 0 23106 - 100th Ave. W. CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER PUBLIC RIGH OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. Edmonds 775-1591 NAME_T, EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED @ Ron Johnson RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED w LOU ADDRESSSTREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED ❑ z 2160 N.W. 204th z U INEERING MEMO DATED w a CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER DEPT. REVIEW CHECK LIST DATE Seattle 546-2288 NAME tREARK Same ADDRESS O U ZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS FCITY TELEPHONE NUMBER w REMARKS 3 STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property • include all easements SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT (show below or attach four copies) z SHORELINE fl O H a U Lot 16, Plat of Viewland Heights VARIANCE OR CU PLANNIN�BY DAT M O YARDS •L� �0 LOT C�O+VER GE Z FRONT SIDE REAR �J p Z aNEW El REMARKS a RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADD/ALTER NON-RESIDENTIAL MECHANICAL REPAIR RETAINING WALL SIGN EXCAVATE FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT DEMOLISH OR FILL ( x FT) PRE -MOVE INSP./ ❑ SWIM COMPLIANCE INSP. POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REQUIRED GROUP LOAD X SIDE SEWER WATER � Ii YES I ' NO REMARKS z a. LINE C) z wNUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF m 0 2 DWELLING / 0 UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) de, n CCU VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. MECHANICAL GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year- Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and U) successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, 21 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature arisinn rliractIv nr inrfiractly frnm rho;ec,.�n , r- • CITY OF EDMONDS OVK CINTIA • EDMONDS. WASNINGTDN ON SINGLE FAI4ILY 11ULTIPLE . COMMERCIAL PROJECT NAME i ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW CHECK LIST CONTACT NAIIE A TELEPHONE NUMBER ADDRESS _ Zz14 & / f ACCESS SLOPE AND VEHICLE ACCESS -'DRAINAGE PLAN STREET FILE LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFICATION %QUIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS EASEMENT - PUBLIC/PRIVATE CALCULATE SEWER CONNECTION IF NO LID / STREET PAVING REQUIRED CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED SIDEWALK REQUIRED 'I / CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY REOUIREO RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMI BOND REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC IMPROV STREET NAME SIGN REQUIRED OTHER SIGNING REQUIRED (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK) EXISTING WATER MAIN SIZE N �- WPTER MAIN REQUIRED y/i¢ SERVICE LINE REQUIPED W HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING j r < HYDRANT REQUIRED PER FIRE CODE �//,¢ SIZE $ CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION WATER 11ETER CHARGE EQUIREO�- v REVIEW BY 2 DATE (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK) SAITARY SEWER DMIIING HUM.BER FILE NUN4BER W SIDE SEWER AVAILABILITY SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION FEE REQUIRED' •W f� OPEN DITCH EXISTING Y , REQUIRED DATE: YZ$4— MEMO TO: Building; Division Community Development Department FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: 1;/4 IV After review of the subject Building Permit application, we have the following; comments: ` 1. Connection to City water system required. 2. Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. S. Backwater valve required if downstairs plumbing; is below elevation of upstream manhole. 6. Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7. Builder/Owner responsible for containing all temporary run-' off and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties in any way. 2 N J. /it 'a Signature OWNER/CON TiRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DRAKE 'Nothing in this permit epprovAl pproaeee shell be interpreted aallowing �or permitt3ag the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconforming or unpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the rmit application, regardless of whether such LO11 C1Qb�Z� 0 GIMERSDOWNSPOiJTO 3, OQNNFrY 770 EXIST. ; i r. L 55 5 R&Ize> A-LL --155 = 540 t' To t o L } Se-t- 0R62.S building, structure or condition is shown on the .y-o u5 t site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or >7� condition may be the subject of a separate Ao)m11 oo.') enforcement action. ACCEPTAMBALTER� TUNE DaTUµ - 00 20910. 1'` E, T U5 Date: / z(2cl(00 l2•gro0' a �7o D 321 = Ep&� oORFACES u0 BE COVr.11ED WITHIW ? DAY. S r r J, �� SS'C4Slr.•�cK 11 I / 1 rWd /7 *solo I f s / � F)< GHe-RM. I H ILO I Zl G� L L� pL N , . 1 bts�5 �� STREET FILE APPROVED W PLANNING az7-io�REVISI� FEB 0 " 20R0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS -�v e o�AQivew� 14B(HT CALL MnY = 2h-0 - 0 0 PLANNING DATA NAME: I1(,r e, SITE ADDRESS. f IV DATE: �GI ZI �� off/ � ZONING: a-s— IZ PLAN CHK#: n_ _6 IGj t�7 r ..4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: f CORNER LOT 'V (Yes/No) FLAG LOT �( (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: ` Left Side: Id Right Side: ln, Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front:�Q_Left Side:Right Side: Rear. Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) SW Vf LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED e(YIN) LOT COVERAGE: °' Maximum Allowed: Actual: f� nP BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: �S Actual Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT AREA: )-�. Toe) OTHER: Plan Review can 1aXpertn;A^phmdw.dw n CA FILE NO. 4 (IC?' Z q Z Cr1kcal Areas Checklist -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: - &(p , 600 , 0) (c) / Mo 0 3, Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): i /7l �00 cI-� 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 5X )Iif - 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. i< Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). (41 \80T 4 F-415T lr �0�6m WES) Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). .10. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ^a chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 City of Edmonds TW Ire CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST r The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address City State Telephone Signature Date Zip Applicant Representative: Name 6?4q M-AIN s 1 Street Address -EPHMW5 WA C 20 City State Zip +2S -7'74- II-3 Telephone cam— Sign ure Date c:receptionyanakad doc (over) 10 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Todd Tegman Determination #: CA-98-292 Project Name: Non -Project Specific Permit Number: Site Location: 1214 —11`h Place N. Property Tax Acct #: 6066 000 016 0000 Project Description Non -Project Specific Determination: Conditional Waiver: During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site is within an Erosion Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): X _ There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 20.15B; X — The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; X _ The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; X _ The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: I. Alterations within identified Erosion Hazard Areas shall not be authorized without an approved erosion control plan pursuant to ECDC Chapter 18.30, which includes staged clearing, where appropriate. The erosion control plan must be approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Department. 2. Clearing or disruption of the soils within an Erosion Hazard Area shall be kept at the minimum necessary to provide reasonable use of the site. 3. Any project shall be constructed in compliance with the City of Edmonds approved plans and code requirements. 4. A Tree Clearing Permit shall be required for trees proposed to be cut on any portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. i Meg Gruwell 12/3/9$ Name Signa a Date 1n c . 1 S W3 December 4, 1998 Todd Tegman 849 Main Street Edmonds, WA. 98020 • • CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 98-292 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. y You must submit a cony of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL -40 PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Enc: Critical Areas Determination * Architectural Design Board C: Reception\Jana\C R LT R.doc Thank you. Sharla Graham Planning Secretary • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan foc.1B9p. December 4, 1998 Todd Tegman 849 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 t, • CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDs, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist # 98-292 Dear Applicant: DEC 0 8 1898 Qr�, COPY Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records. .......... ...... _. __... IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED: PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION"FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS... YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY. The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a project -specific determination. y You must submit a copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL .4111111 PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances ' Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications, Any other development permit applications. Thank you. .. , . :. ' Sharla.Graham' Planning Secretary Enc: Critical Areas Determination * Architectural Design Board C: ReceptionU ana\C R LTR.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister. Cities International — Hekinan, Japan City of Edmonds e _ €' -0 I�WCRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City . will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date c:reception�analcacl. doc Applicant Representative: -F01212 ffGMs.� Name 94q MAIN s 1 Street Address EPHONP15 WA zo City State Zip +25 -7'7--- 1 i 3 1 Telephone Sign re Date (over) CA FILE NO. q $ " Z. q Zr Stritical Areas Checklit ---------------- --------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: (j bi (o W,01(,6000 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): ��1 �00 6�� 4. Is this site currently developed? - yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? FC I�f . -^7F K 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. X Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of V 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). X Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). (41 5?T 4 F 46T rf6f9M UNES) Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: DETERMINATION ^ca chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Todd Tegman Determination # Project Name: Non -Project Specific Permit Number: CA-98-292 Site Location: 1214 —111h Place N. Property Tax Acct #: 6066 000 016 0000 Project Description Non -Project Specific Determination: Conditional Waiver: During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site is within an Erosion Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): X _ There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 20.15B; X The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; X The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; X The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. Alterations within identified Erosion Hazard Areas shall not be authorized without an approved erosion control plan pursuant to ECDC Chapter 18.30, which includes staged clearing, where appropriate. The erosion control plan must be approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Department. 2. Clearing or disruption of the soils within an Erosion Hazard Area shall be kept at the minimum necessary to provide reasonable use of the site. 3. Any project shall be constructed in compliance with the City of Edmonds approved plans and code requirements. 4. A Tree Clearing Permit shall be required for trees proposed to be cut on any portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Meg Gruwell 12/3/98_ Name Signa�e Date CA FILE vo. q e- z q z ' 4ical Areas ChecklistN -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) p 1. Site Address/Location: K14r �� 1 �- e Nov 2. Property Tax Account Number: _ (� 6l4 • 600 J 01 iP 600 O 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): I /1, q00 GIf- 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? 1�7'f 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. x. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.��- Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance. of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). (k� ( hk5T P�d��(�f'1 M&S� Other. (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway fioodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: City of Edmonds 7 V E, . Fclt N 0 *4 3 ® 1998 V4W CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or :his/her representative; must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a'development permit application. Please. submit a vicinity map along with -the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their .preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that, the answers provided are factual; to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address City State Telephone Signature Date c:reception\jana\cacl.doc Applicant Representative: Toles Name 841 M1N5T Street Address F-040NP15 .... WA Zo Zip City State Zip J. Date M CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 1214 - 11"' Place North Determination: Study Required Tax Acct. Number: 00606600001600 Determination #: CRA-1998-0292 Applicant: Keith Beddow . Owner: Howard Chermak Note: Ownership and applicant information changed following original critical areas determination. NOTE: THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE CONDUCTED FOR THIS PROPERTY ON DECEMBER 3, 1998 DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINED AN EROSION HAZARD AREA, AND A "CONDITIONAL WAIVER" FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT A STUDY WAS ISSUED. HOWEVER, SINCE THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINS OR IS ADJACENT TO A SLOPE THAT IS STEEP ENOUGH TO BE CONSIDERED A LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA. THEREFORE, THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE HAS BEEN CHANGED, AND THE CURRENT CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPERTY IS "STUDY REQUIRED" DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF LANDSLIDE HAZARD AND EROSION HAZARD AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may either contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard Areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT - LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). 1 M M • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.13. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: • Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. • Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. • Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. • For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Jen Name / Signat�r� Date rA NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www dedmonds.wa.us. . CRA-1998-292 This map displays LIDAR data at approximate 2-foot contour intervals. This map is for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for any action. Actual topog" should be verified in the field by survey accuracy. This map.is provided with all f on an "as is" and "as available" basis. N warranty of any kind is given. Users of this map agree to indemnify and save harmless the City of Edmonds, its officials, officers, employees and/or agents from and against any claim, demand or action, irrespective of the nature of the cause of the claim, demand or action, arising out of any use or possession of this map. N W E S 1 inch equals 30 feet 0 10 20 40 Feet I I I I I I I I City of Edmonds3 ril 99 8 CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date c:reception\jana\cacl. doc Applicant Representative: Tow jt raMA>J Name Street Address 50409(5 WA Zo City State Zip 4zr? - -7-74- o Telephone �, RECEIVED OCT 2 0% Sign ure 111/�0-1� Date BUILDING DEPT. (over) ' CA FILE.VO. q�- Z Z. CAcal Areas Checklist 9 -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: ' 000 , 01l 7 000 o 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): f /�1 q00 GI 4. Is this site currently developed? >(- yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? FXVA- '5;f K 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. x Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. (tLrl Af MUf PLR Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). X Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). (4T WF,5-F 04,5T LNES) Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where,water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: DETERMINATION ^w chk.doc. Rev M03/97 0 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Todd Tegman Determination # Project Name: Non -Project Specific Permit Number Site Location: 1214 — 111h Place N. I Property Tax Acct # Project Description Non -Project Specific CA-98-292 6066 000 016 0000 Determination: Conditional Waiver: During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site is within an Erosion Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20. l5B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): X _ There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 20.15B; X _ The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; X _ The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; X The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. Alterations within identified Erosion Hazard Areas shall not be authorized without an approved erosion control plan pursuant to ECDC Chapter 18.30, which includes staged clearing, where appropriate. The erosion control plan must be approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Department. 2. Clearing or disruption of the soils within an Erosion Hazard Area shall be kept at the minimum necessary to provide reasonable use of the site. 3. Any project shall be constructed in compliance with the City of Edmonds approved plans and code requirements. 4. A Tree Clearing Permit shall be required for trees proposed to be cut on any portion of the lot that has slopes exceeding 25 percent. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Meg Gruwell12/3/98_ Name Sign Date CA FILE NO. qe--Z q Z CAcal Areas Checklist 0 -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: K14 111, a1 6-e Now 2. Property Tax Account Number: b b�(0 • 600, 01( 1 600 0 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): �n/l q00 5f 4. Is this site currently developed? �(_ yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? F x l5•f . '�,F lK 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. X Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. (f L01 9 MTU . PLO Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of v 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). (41� WSsT ffi(MU$) Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: - What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course: 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: N City of Edmonds V4W CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. ' The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). ;i E`�9 E,PO N 0 V 3 0 1998 An' applicant; , or,;his/her .representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review -the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit- application. Please, submit a .vicinity map along with -the signed copy of, this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of ' property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan; topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist. ,staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that, the answers provided -are factual; io the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/Applicant: Name Street Address City State Telephone Signature Date cxeception\jana\caddoc Zip Applicant Representative: Toles TfGM.W Name 9461 MAIN 151T Street Address r-PHOlyP5 ._ 'WA 160 zo -City ,State Zip 425 . T7 4-, 113 I . Telephone Signature 0.1�9-q� Date "/.. .:rF .' .,Jai. � .•r 0 CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 1214 - 11 "' Place North Determination: Study Required Applicant: Keith Beddow Note: Ownership and applicant information chan Tax Acct. Number: 00606600001600 Determination #: Owner: CRA-1998-0292 Howard Chermak al critical areas determination. NOTE: THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE CONDUCTED FOR THIS PROPERTY ON DECEMBER 3, 1998 DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINED AN EROSION HAZARD AREA, AND A "CONDITIONAL WAIVER" FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT A STUDY WAS ISSUED. HOWEVER, SINCE THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINS OR IS ADJACENT TO A SLOPE THAT IS STEEP ENOUGH TO BE CONSIDERED A LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA. THEREFORE, THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE HAS BEEN CHANGED, AND THE CURRENT CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPERTY IS "STUDY REQUIRED" DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF LANDSLIDE HAZARD AND EROSION HAZARD AREAS. CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may either contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard Areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT - LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). L' 0 • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: • Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. • Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. • Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. • For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. 2 0 EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Novem Name / Signat�r� Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. Dennis III. Bruce, P.E. T M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer January 3, 2008 City of Edmonds DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. CITY OF EDMONDS 655 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations Chermak Residence House Addition 1214 11e' PI. N, Edmonds, Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Chermak property at 1214 11t' PI. N, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / contractor concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements for critical areas. REFERENCES: • House Addition Plans by Chermak Construction • City of Edmonds Notice Letter • Site photographs BACKGROUND: The overall Chermak property is rectangular in shape with approximately 100 feet of frontage (along 11t' PI. N) and approximately 135 feet of depth (see plot plan). The property contains the existing Chermak residence, as situated in the site plan and visible in the photographs. The overall property contains a relatively flat central building zone, as well as steep slopes fronting 11 m Pl. N, and at the rear of the residence. Visual evaluation of the existing Chermak residence reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no obvious foundation cracking, no settlements, or any evidence of erosional degradation. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (208) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 Seattle D.P.D. • • c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 2 It is understood that Mr. Chermak proposes to construct 2 small house additions, as indicated on the attached site plan. The City of Edmonds has required a geotechnical review and investigation with regard to the eastern slopes. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 2 soil test holes were hand dug by this engineer on December 11, 2007. Both test holes revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Wood chips, parking gravel, etc. 6" to 38" (bottom of test holes) Very dense stable silty sand No groundwater was encountered in either of the 2 test holes. Both test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Chermak property at 1214 11 h PI. N, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically approved for the proposed two minor additions, subject to the following: • Setback distance: The proposed additions will not be constructed any closer to the toe -of -eastern slope than the existing residence (see plans). The locations for the additions are geotechnically approved. • Existing toe -of -slope wall: The toe -of -eastern slope is stabilized with an existing timber wall (see photographs). This wall is stable and shall not be disturbed by the new construction. • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 3,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 P.O. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. Seattle D.P.D. • • c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. Seattle D.P.D. 0 • c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure" Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Seattle D.P. D. 0 c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 5 Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: It is understood that the two minor additions will not require any excavation greater than 4 feet in depth. Hence, no temporary shoring is required. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Seattle D.P. D. • 0 c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 6 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the 2 test holes during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: • Seattle D.P. D. c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 7 Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements LJ Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing Chermak residence or the overall property. Seattle D.P. D. • c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. • January 3, 2008 Page 8 It is understood that the two new minor additions will "blend" the new rooflines with a similar "blending" with the existing gutters, downspouts and existing storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. SLOPES — SETBACKS - BUFFERS: As stated, the existing eastern slope is geotechnically stable. The slope is covered with stable vegetation and reposes at approximately 21-1:1V (see photographs). The toe of the eastern slope is stabilized with a timber landscaping / retaining wall. This wall reveals no evidence of any movement, bulging, erosional degradation. The attached site plan clearly depicts the two minor house additions as not encroaching any closer to the toe-of-eastem slope. The alignment and locations for the two additions are geotechnically approved, subject to geotechnical inspections. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts and proximity to eastern toe -of -slope • Foundation sub -grade verification • Any retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation • Temporary and permanent erosion control measures SUMMARY: The proposed Chermak addition project geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. Seattle D.P. D. • c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. • January 3, 2008 Page 9 STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the Chermak house addition project have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be noted to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj V • F 0, L.5 zao toy b''� 2� 1'Oo t _ Clntoo- o • s A U31 _ 6 it; CID 4sw-^ as' JL I b%*O o It 1 , 61b Ps � II3•a. .THE cHer� �►� 12E61D�NLC' ._.._ � . � � 11.4 •� D I1 4•0 I Z.144 ll-'' pt.. N. S17r10 o-s IMPOfi1MArp %UaFDs6 dG't' = 131s.�1 HaX ° 135• G C9l3ai ate,, xz-,o4' Lea b►� Lo-r rc, VIPLo 3700 7 j a & 00G60dkne o �g�i� ppDt TtDu a % O0 � ... .� TOIZ-L. = 5i.• I # LOT = 135cyo� 44 "/b Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer January 3, 2008 ��1 Q'CVELt opm City of Edmonds clrY Et�r pLss VIC CrR c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. 655 Edmonds Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations Chermak Residence House Addition 1214 11"' Pl. N, Edmonds, Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Chermak property at 1214 11th PI. N, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / contractor concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements for critical areas. REFERENCES: • House Addition Plans by Chermak Construction • City of Edmonds Notice Letter • Site photographs BACKGROUND: The overall Chermak property is rectangular in shape with approximately 100 feet of frontage (along 11th PI. N) and -approximately 135 feet of depth (see plot plan). The property contains the existing Chermak residence, as situated in the site plan and visible in the photographs. The overall property contains a relatively flat central building zone, as well as steep slopes fronting 11t" PI. N, and at the rear of the residence. Visual evaluation of the existing Chermak residence reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no obvious foundation cracking, no settlements, or any evidence of erosional degradation. STREET FILE SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 Seattle D.P.D. c% Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 2 It is understood that Mr. Chermak proposes to construct 2 small house additions, as indicated on the attached site plan. The City of Edmonds has required a geotechnical review and investigation with regard to the eastern slopes. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 2 soil test holes were hand dug by this engineer on December 11, 2007. Both test holes revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Wood chips, parking gravel, etc. 6" to 38" (bottom of test holes) Very dense stable silty sand No groundwater was encountered in either of the 2 test holes. Both test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Chermak property at 1214 11 PI. N, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically approved for the proposed two minor additions, subject to the following: • Setback distance: The proposed additions will not be constructed any closer to the toe-of-eastem slope than the existing residence (see plans). The locations for the additions are geotechnically approved. • Existing toe -of -slope wall: The toe -of -eastern slope is stabilized with an existing timber wall (see photographs). This wall is stable and shall not be disturbed by the new construction. • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 3,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wail design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 P.O. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. Seattle D.P. D. c% Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction Passive Earth Pressure Where: Design Value 0.55 350 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. Seattle D.P. D. c% Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the wails. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Seattle D.P.D. c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 5 Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: It is understood that the two minor additions will not require any excavation greater than 4 feet in depth. Hence, no temporary shoring is required. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnicai engineer, excavation carts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:IV. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Seattle D.P.D. c/o Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 6 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the 2 test holes during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: • • • Seattle D.P. D. Go Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 7 Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, on -site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing Chermak residence or the overall property. Seattle D.P.D. clo Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 8 It is understood that the two new minor additions will "blend" the new rooflines with a similar "blending" with the existing gutters, downspouts and existing storm water system. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. SLOPES -- SETBACKS - BUFFERS: As stated, the existing eastern slope is geotechnically stable. The slope is covered with stable vegetation and reposes at approximately 21-1:1V (see photographs). The toe of the eastern slope is stabilized with a timber landscaping / retaining wall. This wall reveals no evidence of any movement, bulging, erosional degradation. The attached site plan clearly depicts the two minor house additions as not encroaching any closer to the toe-of-eastem slope. The alignment and locations for the two additions are geotechnically approved, subject to geotechnical inspections. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts and proximity to eastern toe -of -slope • Foundation sub -grade verification • Any retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation • Temporary and permanent erosion control measures SUMMARY: The proposed Chermak addition project geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. 0 • Seattle D.P.D. Go Chermak Construction, Inc. January 3, 2008 Page 9 STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the Chermak house addition project have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. V I, t��( PE-, Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj M'Es 12MI Ap 0 0 %MtiA ca vx•o 8 W=#,Tl"w ITS fah4 I°_Z -T1d� �Hf? R•t•'1 /ate R�5ti7�µ4� I ZJ4, LUTW A.- N- rz l o"O-s r-- ' 1N�t�1t�Wa SUGtFD�E (9tdt> tp-%v zs,,4' Qjq+DEsge- - F40, , (gadt) UPI row 3700 Tcu-L = 9941 t LOT = 135�� > 44% lbGHT G9te.- I P 111 �. H C - It.4•&, D = it 4•-v MpX ° 135.4 L am bQ!5—e 1.o1 fCs Vti<to 0 PLANNING .DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL • STREET FILE Name: 11� _J Date: Site Address: � Plan Check #: Project Description: a$O tjr,�ac%a/���on`s��nc� q� 90c+���o� Reduced Site Plan Provided: YE NO) Zoning: Map Page: '26Y Corner Lot: (YES Flag Lot: (YES NQ)' Critical Areas Determination /#: 199$ - a9;t Study Required — La�S1;c�e. t }ire- — G��G �p�/ ❑ Waiver 6racz o(��eo1 1�3I Cone c�o�� aa1i Exe 6e2 g SEPA Determination: ncAr de�4tiM er ko -k�ne, ,\i i o� - (�� S�p�• XExempt ❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Required Setbacks Street: 60 a Side: O Side: ' Rear: �a5� Actual Setbacks Street: /`} Side: N I3 / ide: 1 O , Rear: aC ❑ Detached Structures: ❑ Rockeries: s�°ca� o�\�"'=• ❑ Fences/Trellises:` ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: Stairs/Deck: Ex ;,, ci/ec 3� Buildin Height Datum Point: ;5� G� Datum Elevation: + Oi Maximum Height Allowed: / Caqcn. Actual Height: Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: a Lot Area: ro36 _ i3gG g}� ipo IQ,o Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: a tr g Lot Coverage Calculations: , , d7 =_,:k7o alg to - Ia 9GD4! ADU Created: (YES /9 Subdivision: e --> Legal Nonconforming Land Use Deter ination Issued: (YES /0 Comments Plan Review By: %arming Data Form 04-i t-06Adoc Ye L4 iz t,., 1A. Iq.j 11th PLACE N Ab. ------ ---- - {tin hol ---------------- ----------------- ------------- ", 04 ell f 'ep Ac . iT 0 46 - — -- ------------ ajr- -- ------------------- I ------ --- - - - -- - - - - - --- . .......................... -------------- Aw .............. ------- 4re L W 3V CITY OF E :a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTOT 0 SIDE SEWER PERMIT FOR INSPECTION CALL • permit dV� Ext. V9 Issue Date LO * PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON ,JOB SITE /� / l � EDMONDS Address of Construction Z- //'',�`,.r�✓� LA L;L Property Legal Description (include all. easements),/ ';,, r LU. Single Family Residence )( Multi -Family No. of Units Commercial Owner and/or Builder C- p AfiT 1--9 C Mr ; } , C05. Contractor & License No. \,t) )01)Ck O P T Ii1c yl I& <_i � 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No,'- Yes (�f Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (��4���4�) before excavation) . 1-800-424-SSSS 7. Cross other private property: Yes No A� Easement required - attach legal description and county easement number. READ THE FOLLOWT-.NG AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each installation for one year. C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") side sewer line. d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade. of 2% (1.15°) and maximum grade of 100% (450). f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/8,bend) is allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 450 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side.sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. A. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due -to poor compaction of fill. -k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1: Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working -days notice required. 1 DATE I certify that I ,have read and shall comply,/with the above r , PERMIT FEE: �30-0 7 DISAPPROVED By: Date: 0 w / All ?I /� �' /�1 or ( O 0 Date: CONNECTION FEE�J94 APPROVED By :? Date: w * PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO_ ........................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION [Z REPAIRS F7 LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO. .................. OWNER ... \A[00Z-C-RA= .... H.Oln.e ------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR .......... PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS ... 121A ---------- 1174 .... PL- --- N ---------------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO- -_---I ........ ................ BLOCK N -------- � -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF ADDITION .... ShEwt-A*40 ... 1AF-A-c-,.14TS- A- 4: 5bp N 4-C-06 < N 0 rrr-+-% W-el r PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) Approved: DATE ...... El --- By --- .. ........................ LYNNWOD OFFICE P•� X 180 :1Q16 204TH S.W. LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 778-3124 OLDS OL-YM'PIC INC ,. OPERATING OLYMPIC PAVING SEATTLE OFFICE HEATING OILS • ASPHALT PAVING SEATT E, WA 98103 .. HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING . 632-0450:; PROPOSAL SUBMITTED'K 8 PHONE . Mike DATE STREET ADDRESS: ='/1t NV �QQth �� JOB LOCATION CITY, STATE, ZIP C 4a1L0.4 r O r-T l O N A L n.JL • m3111b"t► IlltVRjr,ir><N� RJR" 0° �'Y 1�,,.,, T ALL PRICES PL lace payment charge may be made on en US TAX a "FINANCE CHARGE' and it is com y past due balance, which the law calls PERCENTAGE RATE OF EIGHTEEN ERCENd aT). d at a It�istagreed hat rate of n�case suit is AUTHORIZE instituted to collect amount due on this contract or is SIGNATURE able attorneys lees and court costs may be added to this conttra� n thereof, reason- THIS PROPOSAL MAY BE WITHDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED WITHIN 30 DAYS Permits, If required, will be the owners responsibility. We shall not be liable for damage to or breakage of septic tanks, underground pipe damage ardor conduits not visible from the surface of the ground nor for an damage to approaches (including sidewalks) from the street to file property line. We cannot be responsible for sub grade failures or settling of subgrade material which was not Installed under the above agreement. y Soil sterilization whorsetail weed, morning glory, deep weed killer), if Included in contract, will be applied at rates specified by manufacturer. Olds Olympic Inc. will not be responsible for an quent growths of rooted ferns, or perennials, which have not reached m:;luril y prior to application. All material is guaranteed as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. y subse Olds Olympic Inc. accepts no responsibility for any work other than that specifically described above. Any additions to or alterations of the above work will executed only upon written orders and may become an additional charge. All agreements are contingent on strikes, accidents, delays of carriers, and other delays unavoidable or beyond our control. De ,..,.a.c—TUUH SIGNATURE ON ONE COPY, RETURNED TO US; WILL MAKE THIS A LEGAL CONTRACT PENDING ACCEPTABLE CREDIT APPROVAL. ACCEPTANCE BY Wert I 8� OFFICE COPY CITY OF EDMONDS ASSET INFORMATION SHEET NEW. • ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT DESCRIPTION LOCATION l **PURCHASE ORDER NO. _ PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST STREET FILF ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. �'e SERIAL NO. DEPT/NO. , I *PROJECT NUMBER o'i�� PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST Z'': � B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. • ESTIMATED LIFE a� INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY **SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY VERIFIED BY (El DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT PROCESSED.VIP �� x- •- ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT BATCH NO. ,� #w • G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE INITIAL ttnp DEPARTMENT FILE 'i' :. <rw y r _ " V r` ,' •x..t,; xove ••r :�•isewna�m'a City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Perm;t Number: STREET FILE Issue Date: _ �� ' 30 A Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1214 11 Place. North (Y90-19y B. Type of Work (be specific): Install New Service C. Contractor: Washington NAtural Gas Company Mailing Address: 815 Mercer Street, State License #: Seattle, WA 98111 D. Building Permit'# (if applicable): Contact: Frank Swan Phone: 224-2278 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): k: E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ® Utility (PUD, GTE,',WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other .I, INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes ®No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ D' SIGN %�� �� INDEMNITY. Applicant, understands and by his signature to this application, agZc1d the City of Edmonds hatmte�srfr' 4nj 4ssUamages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its department or employ- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this pe»mt. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR,A-PERIPD..gF ONE YEAR FOLLOW1NG1THE FINAL INSPEC77ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORA7ON FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L''�I HE FINAL STREET PATCH IS•CthiPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call'. the -Engineering Department- 771-3202. , Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City<Engineer�- All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. . 1 have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit'will be available on site at all times for inspectio urposes. Signature: ��Date: June 24, 1992 (Con rLio- or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY as r APPROVED;BY ;:> R1GHT OF;WAY DEPOSIT .... TIME;AUTHORIZED NOID AFTER . EA ..- DAYS:...:.. DISRUPTION .>F.EEIF.UND 111 >; ..SPECIAL:CONDrrIONS::: 1 qA' .__. __ RESTORATION FEE::.; COMMENTS: RECEIPT A AI DATE:. ISSUED .C%.r ._J Lo to ...... __ .... _. _ ........................ t NO WORK SHALL BEGIN. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. Engrg. Div. 1991 F 1 FIELD INSPECTION IRTES (Fund 111 -Route copy to Street Dep4--) Comments• Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION O YES O NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 9, SAAL- NatcaatGds:�' 12 1 4 \1 PL-- 0 n IwNG water main depth unknown Z " gas main Addendum to City of Edmonds Right of. Way Permit Application. Submitted by: RIGFIARG NIL -LARD Engineering Aide Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 X2761 pager V• rJ a G..� s eyµ aey: -w water -g- gas -SS- sewer water hydrant 915 Maees.SL (P.O. Box 1869)..Sande. WA 98111 (M5) 6=-6767 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 FILE PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 STAT[ Permit Number: ENG20080301 Address of Public Use/Encroachment: 1214 11TH PL N, EDMONDS BUSINESSP11OPERTY OWN Ell HOWARD & JUDITH TRUST CHERMAK 1214 1 ITH PL N EDMONDS, WA 98020-2548 5'x 8' addition and 9x24' ofexisting garage encroach into side sewer easement. ENG20080301 STREET USE: Placement of any temporary or movable objects in any portion of public space or Citv right-of-way shall meet all code requirements as set forth in the following chapters of the Edmonds Community Development Code. ENCROACHMENT: Permanent structures encroaching upon anv portion of public space. City right-of-wav or easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapter of the Edmonds Community Development Code. CODE APPLICATION: Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. All terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth in full and this permit therefore is subject to the terms of those chapters. FOR THE TERM IN WHICH THIS PUBLIC USE/ENCROACHMENT IS IN EFFECT, THE OWNER SHALL COMPL Y WITH THE PERMIT CONDITIONSSET FOR THBYTHIS PERMIT. NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporary nature, shall vest no permanent right and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion of the City per ECDC 18.70.040. Applicant is responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21st day of January. INDEMNITY: The Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the applicant understands that he/she shallprovide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certtificate of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance. THIS APPLICATION IS NOT PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. n e Printed: Mondav, September 15, 20( DA v I FQLECOPY ❑ INS PECTOR COPY ❑ APPLICANT COPY STATUS: ISSUED ENG20080301 • The proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel. • Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively approved. • The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public. • The proposal either benefits the public interest, safety or convenience (e.g., supports or protects the city street) or is an accessory structure such as fence normally associated with residential use of the property as fully complies with the requirements of criteria 3 above. • Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project. • None When recorded mail to: City Clerk City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 SPACE ABOVE THE LINE FOR RECORDERS USE Assessor's Parcel No.:_W (g 00 (P0000 I (oX Applicant:Jc)1,fd % .`G&41 Ch&yWK ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the CITY OF EDMONDS ("City") and \ c % m -z" � LE�L--M (� �{` �x—P ("Owner[s]"), in accordance with Chapter 18.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. C--"AMP—: C.�t, of'�dinoivc 1. The =—er ✓Owner is the owner of that c rtain real property located at Q (��Nc -- �t� b�1 gwSiM' n� the City of Edmonds, Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number t Q and more particularly described as follows �At o N xx k Ono I. 'i1_Cx) \� or as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. The Easement. The City right-of-way adjacent to owner's property or an existing easement used for.(strike those that don't ap ly) [sec4; wad, Alky, oairsoe aaIlc, bil>opM, pe4astian went, sanitary sewer, w , stPFTff"09r9r 3. The Encroachment. The Owner desires to encroach upon the public easement and the City hereby covenants and agrees and grants its permission to Owner to allnw��( l L Q \ c PT Of UAW ftr"bs fit} 0 �` _ i ' to remain in a po ion of the City right-of-way/easement. A partial site plan, scaled 1 "=20% showing the location of the encroachment is attached as Exhibit `B" and incorporated by reference. This Agreement is subject to the following terms and conditions: eg L sk l 0 a. On behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, the Owner promises to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace the encroachment located in the easement at their sole expense to the standards established by the City. All maintenance, repair, removal and/or replacement shall be conducted solely at the Owners' expense. b. The Owner, on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns, acknowledge that the City had no obligation to approve the encroachment within the easement for the sole benefit of the Owner, and the agreements contained herein, provide sufficient consideration for the Owner and their successors and assigns to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace said encroachment located in the easement at their sole expense in perpetuity. c. The Owner promises to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim or liability of any kind or nature arising from or out of its promises contained within this agreement, including any damage that may be caused to the encroachment by the City's operation, maintenance, repair, replacement or other work related to construction activity within the easement This promise to hold harmless and indemnify includes defense by counsel of the City's choosing, the payment of reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. Nothing herein, however, shall be interpreted to require the Owner to indemnify the City from the negligence or intentional tortuous act of its employees, officers, or agents. d. The Owner shall at the request of the City, promptly remove, repair, reconstruct, and/or replace the encroachment at the Owners' sole expense. Upon receipt of notification from the City that the City requires removal of all or portions of the encroachment from within the easement, the Owner will promptly remove those portions of the encroachment from within the easement area as required by the City at their sole expense. If the portions of the encroachment required by the City to be removed are not timely removed by the Owner, they shall be removed by the City at the expense of the Owner, and the'Owner shall reimburse the City for the costs of removal of the encroachment and disposal of materials as well as for any increased construction costs or consequential damages incurred by the City due to the Owners' delay. In the event that portions of the encroachment must be removed to facilitate utility and/or construction activity by the City within the easement or other requirements of the City, the Owner shall be solely responsible for replacement of the encroachment at their expense upon completion of the utility and/or construction or other activity by the City. e. Whatever rights and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the easement shall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected by City's grant of permission to construct and maintain the encroachment structure. -2of4- f. The property owner is required to provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional insured, withrespect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance. A copy of the insurance certificate shall be provided to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 21" day of January. 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. This agreement may not be amended except in writing in a document filed of record with the auditor of Snohomish County, Washington. 5. Notices. Any notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent in writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid, registered or certified with return receipt requested, or by other comparable commercial means and addressed as follows: If to the City: City Engineer City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 If to the Owner: I-K'Ctik C.�� NAO O O which addresses may be changed from time to timeby providing notice to the other party in the manner described above. 6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner shall not constitute a waiver of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. Any waiver by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement. 7. Termination of Agreement. In addition to any other remedy provided for by law, the City reserves the right to terminate this agreement in the event the encroachment negatively impacts or damages the City's easement and/or underlying utility systems or violates any condition of service adopted by the City, at its sole discretion, as may be necessary to prevent damage to the City's utility system, or any other public facility which may be impacted by the Owners' failure to properly use the easement. 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors, .and assigns. j Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the property, but any failure to do so does not invalidate this provision. -3of4- 9. Capa6ty. Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s) thereby bind such party. IN WI NESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this day of ,20 09 OWNER(S . By. a STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH By: �� C This day, personally appeared before me, `� t1yl i4(—�'ca9 Q3 , to me known too[ be the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing document and that (he/she/they) rA:?4 signed the same as (his/her/their) free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary PUblic L-Q,, n iY1&, , t4o tjP.S Typed or Printed Name My Commission expires: LDS I Dj l -4of4- ds� sa�oWq� N 1d IZ N 17-1d -3-L I G I N3 W 14 7U�'e�i�q VOL-L�QCL-V "11 v I`I I9.J; 1-S to Z PERMIT.EXPIR_S_ — -1 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS �WAH WNETT w MAILING ADDRESS 0 12 11,114 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE pI , 5M 116020 1445-,-7'*Z060 NAME -roro 'f'E�MaN F- ADDRESS IQ B4°{ MAI14 yT CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EpM�NI?�a 2o 425: 1714-1 I �I NAME GIGO T ¢ ADDRESS �20 21�1N a i CITY / ZIP TELEPHONE 00-rHELL g$421 25 � -te(a Ig12 STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATEK VHLF-Rc 104+n1. f.,� 199 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - INCLUDE ALL EASEMENTS LOT ((P SAT" oFui v�Lau Nis v w 0 J t7 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. w J O `Y 'we , 0 NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH ( ADDITION �r COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR t� ❑ CHANGE OF USE REMODEL APARTMENT SIGN REPAIR GRADING CYDS Ej FENCE X DEMOLISH 0 TANK EjOTHER .GARAGE CARPORT RETAINING WALL[3RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN NUMBER I NUMBER OF. OF /� DWELLING STORIES UNITS DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE `710 ICIF 1001?Ioki AI a] USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER99Q015 JOB / SUITE/APT# ADDRESS f Z / / / / 0, -7 A LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection Required ❑ PROPOSED Sidewalk Required ❑ METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES, PRV REQUIRED r, YES 0 NO 0 9 Lit REMA KS Z z z Z AW w DN• Sr/--r- ENGINEERING,, MEMO DATED FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY REVIEWED BYcc w LL CU I , ADB# I SHORELINE # SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EX.EMP ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED I , EXP LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR w / Z Ir�r 2 2 LOT AREA PLIA�NIN ) EVIEW BY ATE FT) ' CHECKED BY I TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CRITICALe4"k1411101elt- AREAS GA- 10dilll Y 1 FMOEIJG6 HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE a% PLAN CHECK N VESTED DATE THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS N in w -APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS 2 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF a EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND = ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGESOF WHATEVER ATURE, ARISING DIRECTLYOR INDIRECTLY o FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT,{SUANC,E OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE O DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE ORREDUC�F�.Y.E UIREMENTOFANYCITYORDINANCE = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITi�}005,.F' �RCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ T.HIS'APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF . THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC. TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNATUBf-(OWNER q1j' AGJ=P" I DATE SIGNED GROUP SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA -''; OCCUPANT REQUIRED YES i ! LOAD REMARKS"y C PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL GRADING/FILL STATE SURCHARGE STORM DRAINAGE FEES ENG. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT I _1—,[,4211 — TOTAL AMOUNT DUE CALL FOR INSPECTION 11 (425) 771-0220 (4 �w/ ab IZW-1 APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. I ATTENTION (-'"0170 k. TE15rMb.N RELEASED BY DATE .�, � DATE IT IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL eo—r—� s--d AFINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ' P.Ph {� PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR wil WS. lot, 4A iK lkz -r 5eel RT e, -KI 1 L9 ef XV 5 K4.,a, hW, JAU K VED By PCANNING 12 k,6, 140 F, N o'ree kook QU'rlEeeq ILL -rle 1010 W.1110T. SITE PLAN.' c1-lr- 1 WORK BUJIL' i�_".DDRESS "WNER il'41 P PR 0 V E D 0.14' 'G.. OFFICIP p E ... ZONE SETBACKS: FRONT. SIDE— REAR — OTHER HEIGHT 9 EFFE ,0 / i, i i I Ji 1 �1 I 24 "ALV. CMP SUM vP I MESTRICTOFz D��i ` , ✓ _ _ - op-F-SET GRATE so Td NOT rI �' BE oIF2ECTL`Y C>RESTRICTOR N lot vi { ....mac. t.........,.........—.... r� r; TYPE Z C.S. it _ $li Lp� I # I �.rJ 5T1 } , L ' �ti1C:�VVj� j � i 4M: 7. .Y.} f k7 LV� �r r�`ikZ iit i t YAiZO Oip—Avq \\ �Vk;W UT .' DER t�EC ;A x IMPERMEASLE AREA - 5815 SQ. F'T. STIORAGE VOLbMe REQUIRED - 945 CU. FT. i.� 1 1 { p i 4"T'IGHT LINE POR C>OAs W s 24"ALU. CMP SUMP -UPPUR �t ' IWADS tf Wtw, ' MAA Covtp. --" �x"'VC RESTRICTOR SY&CM CROSS StCTIQN INVERT OF- 4" PVC e TEE * 1 AM 7 IN REGTRICTOR 71a" DIA. ORIFICE __ -- 24" ALU. CMP> SUMP i V1a9N�b , lit MAR 2 8 . ig84 DRAINAGE PLAN FOR WOODCRAFT HOMES, INC. MAR 2 6 1984 TYPE I I C.S . 40- z w �t LOB' 10 4 24 "ALU. CMP SUMP + w/ReSTRICTOFZ 04 '. _ OF-IFSET - GRRit-E SD TO NOT itl - , BE ©Ii2EC TLY OV Res-r ZIC TOR. fir.: ! ! R' � 1 � t�lU�lit!►F`{'�� � . YARD l IN SPOUTYNOeR. PECK I _ ' IMPER10EABLE AReA - 5815 SO. F-T. STO�;AGE VC?L "1ME t2E®UIRED - '145 CU. FT t=OOTING DOAfty qj — q 4"TIGHT LINE FOR' POV � SOU,TS 4 p �3 Y-�q LRJ{ ♦ Y 24"ALU. CMP SUMP ; -0I>amp, #„ '--1e"AI>S pmttrioN , i0.s1 1' MfiN , ' eAAx Ci3vEjKk �/,�4•• PVC RESTR1CTOR 4tirrtr�-r tv N g 1% s 4 INVERT OF- 4" PVC L TEt= TQ C3UTt..�7 IN RESTRICTOI'Z 7�e „ 0IA . ORIFICE �__-- '�-- 24" AL.U. CMP SUMP SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 1 a qc# WU. S T E T FILE MAR 2e- 1984 DRAINAGE PLAN Ii FOR t�ODCRAF T HO ES , � c. MAR 2 6 1984 PEAZ CITY COMMENTS H-23-84 RCN i T.o1".ftll_ auerl n+d &'Arisoeiates., Inc. SURVEYORS • DEVELOPMENT. CONSULTAttifT'S • PLANNERS 23106 100TH AVE. W. a EDMONDS WA. 9=0 + PHONE 776-INN ' c"Em 5 b iI~ F.O.. $GALE FM l ram. As directed by Staff Engineer at a counter meeting on Dec. 13s', the following changes were made to the site plan. Using the drainage plan by Lovell Sauerland dated 11/21/1983, the impermeable areas were recalculated to reflect the current impervious areas. It is believed that the original plan which detailed 5815 square feet of impermeable area included an impervious deck. The current deck is pervious and therefore is not included in the calculations made from that plan. d IlG S /b� The house measurements are as follows: 1 • The bedroom area: 22' x 30' and main bath extension 3' x 10' = 690 sq ` • Main living area 37' x 32' and kitchen nook extension 8' x 15' 1304 sq' • Laundry and garage area 35' x 26' less entry jog - 8' x 6' = 862 sq' Subtotal 2856 sq ` The driveway measurements are as follows: • From street to top of driveway: 12' x 55' = 1210 sq' • From top of drive including parking area: 55' x 22' 960 sq ` • Additional asphalt at radius at top of drive: 6' x 6' = 36 sq' Subtotal 2206 sq ' Current impermeable area calculation: 2856 sq ` + 2206 sq ` = 5062 sq ` Addition square footage = 370 sq' 37� New impermeable are calculation with 370 sq 'addition 5432 sq ` The system designed in 1983 by Lovell Sauerland was designed to handle 5815 square feet of impermeable area with a capacity of 145 cubic feet. The newly calculated impermeable area and the new addition can be adequately handled by the original drainage system. "Nothing in this permit approval process 6411 bo interpreted as allowing -or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconforming or unpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the permit application, regardless of whether such building, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate enforcement action." 4-'s-o 2146 * n N//& Lea�, -r4fAQ 4" L1ttiD1"C"l o� �70 t N 6-46ot'rl L-Ai 4;-) OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS REEF FOR EROSION CONT O1. AND C FOOTING DWIS Ht)T TO BE TIED WiTO L ddl *ti T GUT 'ERS1DtDVYiWSPOUTS TO CONNECT T() EXIST. FgFtS`I. ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO BE COVERED WITHIN 2 DP,', S ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL_ SDR 35 SCH 40 N-12 F810 HANCOR E AS NOTED E ,INEERI ' 1� ZZ� •(� //�,p��- Zone 3 a . Corner. Ela Set—, backs Rae u- r ,Actual Froni: v�1 -. , _..."7� I_�C� dl� bL�� �-O`T C.� \l I I��1hl v Sides M/S I' Rear ............. ... Other -5 5�. JAN 10 2008 DEC 2 0 2007 -- BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMEN i _ ui ry r- ;:D% flNDS CITY OF EDMONDS REVISIONS BY ti Y Z D�S��' KErrH GEDDOW 4 S#1956 SIBLE INAGE A 1.0 to 0 o ; A 00 ko W dN' pQ►.a3o N�W C` MM W 0 tA .00. 000 .. Woow�. �°Oxv Vl Ii jj_a. cv Date Scale Drawn,=:k:i=�;-� Job (J_1 Sheet Of �= Sheets 1L X ?A PRINTED ON N0. 10WH cLWPMNT • !DD 7/USA /wry /� �,�� ESUB DEC 2 0 2007 ,3UILDING DEPAR"MA Z, c,l-rY OF EnM011D 1STREET FILE As directed by Staff Engineer at a counter meeting on Dec. 1 e, the following changes were made to the site plan. Using the drainage plan by Lovell Sauerland dated 11/21/1983, the impermeable areas were recalculated to reflect the current impervious areas. It is believed that the original plan which detailed 5815 square feet of impermeable area included an impervious deck. The current deck is pervious and therefore is not included in the calculations made from that plan. The house measurements are as follows: • The bedroom area: 22' x 30' and main bath extension 3' x 10' = 690 sq ` • Main living area 37' x 32' and kitchen nook extension 8' x 15' = 1304 sq' • Laundry and garage area 35' x 26' less entry jog - 8' x 6' = 862 sq ` Subtotal 2856 sq ' The driveway measurements are as follows: • From street to top of driveway: 12' x 55' = 1210 sq ` • From top of drive including parking area: 55' x 22' 960 sq • Additional asphalt at radius at top of drive: 6' x 6' = 36 sq' Subtotal 2206 sq ` Current impermeable area calculation: 2856 sq ' + 2206 sq ` = 5062 sq ` Addition square footage = 370 sq' 370 sq , New impermeable are calculation with 370 sq ` addition 5432 sq ` The system designed in 1983 by Lovell Sauerland was designed to handle 5815 square feet of impermeable area with a capacity of 145 cubic feet. The newly calculated impermeable area and the new addition can be adequately handled by the original drainage system. E'ER,"OW►'VSPOUi;; TO CANNEC. 'C.? EXIST. ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE SDR 35 MATERIAL SCH 40 N-12 FB10 HANCOR OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS "7SPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL : '`, ; ORRINACE; 1-a-` ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO ILO Ca1'3,1500 DE COYE1-1E.0 !Y;THI1N n DA;'S FUSE: Am-0 ot.D t 4 VAW C�A? 3P 1� l 3s '00 . 11 Dlk�CU i� / TYPET U3 j ........ 1 � errnit app�`� �racess shall be "Nothing in this p tt' the or ermi ng illegal, inte r as fanY allowing p m }enance of any currently existm structure nonconforming or 'in e1mitted bude ildings scope a of the or site condition wh �ardl 'of whet -r such he pest application, g building, �ructure or condition is tractors or site Ian or drawing• Such ebuilding,ct p condition may be the subs arate enforcement action'" (t 'D 22l NIA, I.j. I2y1111 ALU U-tp 5UM,� ry I i � d Azo.�t-a � I � --- � � � -�. � I f ; -=� �rDp� a pi��e-de�P✓n�rvc�c�h ati�, I oh jz; d prtz>r P/19.IBC 4i'-04\kl UNt r�uwm tt�a l lu�iho��� I Z-1 L L-nt pL to.. - APPRO D BY PLANNING c o8' 141 (, t � — y Z2o.0 \J -?z b = -721,0 i I✓G � L b>✓-�.� APP NEERING 1ate/ a STREET FILE REVISIONS BY ; �qi r i� :1j VV y... KEI T H 6E DDOW ` S i956 A .A .. V v, 0 OC14 tn' A �o WQN Aa 0 0 x­4ofl 00 H_.00 W00 x 00 V Date Scale Drawn; - Job Sheet Of Sheets 18 X 24 PRINTED ON NO. 1000" CM"PRINT 0 11 7-Mg-3 STREET FILE 1'lh Ary rw