Loading...
1215 OLYMPIC AVE.PDF1111111111111112503 1215 OLYMPIC AVE +� r ADDRESS: /OU L TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBI BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRU( COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: n DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver 0 Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: �f� ' 67' 3"/ 06 `0 -75 _ /� (6 0 —6l DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: Try PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST 2DATED::_( SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: V SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: Q SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DA LID #: LOT: BLOCK: L:\TEMP\DST's\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc PLANNING DAT NAME: �{SiI SITE ADDRESS: 2I J D� l DATE: ZONING:_ PLAN CHK#: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: i CORNER LOT (Yes/No) FLAG LOT (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: Z<-, Left Side: Right Side: Rear: 2 ctua Setbacks- s: Front: Left Side.1 Right' -,Side: 01,4 Rear: A1,4 Street map chec ed for additions setback required (YeslNo) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED O (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: ?U A 2J�a Actual: _a BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: Datum Po SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS M SEPA DETERMINATION: IV IN al Height: m Elevation: The City of Edmonds SOD - APPLICATION CARD No . ........................................ for SIED SEWERPERYaT OUTSIDE ;T-'l- INSIDE [-] REPAIRS EASEMENT No. ....................................... OWNER ...... ......................................... CONTRACTOR ..... ...... .......................................................... PERMIT No. ...... 1-4 k STREET No. ... - r# u HOUSE.No . ........... OAY"112"cz ................................................ ........ AVENUE LOT BLOCK No. ............................................... NAMEADD........................................................................................................................................................... 9AM 4 eyow L rewee L •46 Date Approved: BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................... DEPOSIT, $ --------------------------------------------- SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED .......................................... DATE ap, ca, l � H ........... ....... ........ IV .... ..............V.. . . ...... Y ....... is . .,R - .. _ .. _ .':.s4-_.. ' ' {: `_/.�. __ . ��•..» ,. ,J 4 CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT Call PRospect 6-1107 when worn Is ready for Inspection. (No iWperr 0 1465 SIDESEWER PERMIT tions Saturday,.Sunday or holidays.) ADDRESS--------- ------------- ----- -----12.1.5... Olympic ---Avenue.. owNAR...... Olympic ... lementary--School------ CONTRACTOR Stoll-_ ---Freese Permission is granted .September_-22............. 1g-66., for ...................... days, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with Gity Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2�. No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted. NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. NOTE No. &—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its ap- purtenances except to insert the pipe into the wye. 4 r L-J • PLANNING DATA New Commercial / Mulffamilv Proiects F-1l d q SITE ADDRESS: P ` �� dJ �� ZONING: �S - USE(S) PROPOSED: N G C �LI(1001 ALLOWED?: y�S ,LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED _ (Y;@ CUP.File: _ To Allow What Uses?: ADB FILE #: — PARKING: Use: C" No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: _ X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: _ X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor.area, # employees, etc.) _ Total Required: Actual Provided: SETBACKS: NI C- Required Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA: NI Ci Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: NJ C' Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Modulation Allowed?: Modulation Height: Datum Point: Datum Elevation: Elevator Penthouse > 3 feet over height limit? If so,VAR# LANDSCAPING: N I L Matches ADB approved: Bid Provided? CRITICAL AREAS #: f l I A- Bond Amount (100% bid): SEPA DETERMINATION: S x-e-M P + SHORELINE REQUIRED?: Continued ... 1�0• I:\library\^plandat_NewComm.doc DATE: Or,.(q 1 (v0 0 lv PLAN CHK#: O (o 13 NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: �s4mond�-,,6c*ool D►'sJyjc f #'15 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: V DI lA VItcl y)Y 521�Y1i1 i L UD G rQ d� (1.)CT('1 �P_ �X l Gi-ii C.(5Y1 Gillrt l ci'1'bin J D i rl �tzt l l upaVadew . ADB FILE#: H �1 A- OR DATE WAIVED: 05 /0 1 (20 (p PLANS,MATCH APPROVED PLAN. SUBDIVISION: LOT AGGREGATION REQUIRED?: N O REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? IJ I A N OTHER: I Nd EXZBfAOF— GHAN(aES 1 Plan Review By:1,V 1 a c,o cG,f i 4 I A i brary\^pl andat_NewComm.doc fly PLANNING DATA STREETH _:LE::]l Multi -Family Rrqj@Gts Name:.eaMOVlC1S &JeMM-MV,)t 5CV1001 Date:Site Address: 11,16 dl 9Mp I G Q Vk,Y1 U4e File Number: E3 Lp . 0 Project Description: 11PIW M I14"y path se n-cw Out "Or s-eati n9 arta e.2 a l - D -- -+ Use(s) Proposed: ()u-1-d pOr Allowed Use: ()oNO) CUP File Number: / To Allow What Uses: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES I NO) j Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES / NO) Zoning: V-• rj -- I I - Map Page: Comp Plan Designation: '�-7I• Yl e "' fQ M l r Corner Lot: (ONO) vv\ PSG P A G�-) 8� Vftwl"Ou— Flag Lot: (YES / O) ADB File Number: FL-N .1,00:- • b9 Lot Area: Plans Match ADB Approved: ( ES / NO) Shoreline Required: (YES Critical Areas Determination #: C P-A • 2,00 (0 • I-S ❑ Study Required R'1•ndt� Creel- iVA tm, ngvl(00 Maod PLA-* p►'gjec-+ �•5 ® Waiver 5V110 f,+- . U SEPA Determination: IF Exempt t2� cydg &4* - it + -+5 Cyd5 (,lilt: peer GG C-ngin�er►(n9. ❑ Needed Requires: 1 Fee, 2 Environmental Checklist, and 3 APO List with notarized form Re d Setbacks,' Street: t'. 251 Side: (p� -side. � Rea V WA 25 / . Actual et acks" Street: n Q/ Side: n / Q/ 1 54de: Vt Rea Lot Coverage Required: / Lot Coverage Provided: / Lot Coverage Calculations: 0 j1Q c,V�a v1 g -ems - Bui/din Height Datum Point: Datum Elevation: Maximum Height: Ou-k-"w Gye Actual Height: L 31 C U i- VVII- 5UO 't- Subdivision: / _ Q Lot Aggregation Required: NO VIOL G Pp1I•C Q b Le__ Landscaping Landscaping Matches ADB Approved: f Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO) Bond Amount (100% Bid): Plan Review By: ge;w 6,70 Gflt PLANNING DATA 10 New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects STREET FILE Commercial Parkin ;Anal sis,; ° ` Business Name r Type/Use Parking" Ratio Tenant•` Area Required Parkin Total Parking -Required.• Total, Parking Provided. - Multi -Family Parking Ana/ is.,, # Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit Parking Ratio 4 Units Required Parkin Studio 1 Bedroom 1.5/D.U. 2 Bedrooms 1.8/D.U. 3 + Bedrooms 2 :Q/D. U. , Total Parking Required. - Total Parking Provided. - Plan Review By: guts ae� - �vl 11-7 SPIV W.1711 a TIC as 4 1,1... q 't WED R�G;i�U�('._.I 06/19/2008 11:03 425-670-7258 ESD MAINTENANCE 2827 Alderwood Mall Blvd Lynnwood; WA 98036 . • • �• <• [Phone) 425-670-7244 [fax) 42-"70-7268 District FaX t�i F.� O . NMI@"' I %,,� Fay J ` Pages: L ov�G` Phone Date: Re: cc. ❑ urvem For Rad.w ❑ Plwso Commmet ❑ Ploaoe Reply ❑ Please Recycle PAGE 01 06/15/2008 11:03 425-670-7258 ESD MAINTENANCE PAGE 02 Al DI 1 , ' je L�Rl;1K. i d i f „ el � loll I — 1 1 u r t J oo— 06/19/2008 11 :03 425-670-7258 ESD MAINTENANCE PAGE 03 01 or 06/19/2008 11:03 425-670-7258 ESD MAINTENANCE PAGE 04 DRAIN FIELD SCALE/T'=r O ELEMETARY WEST PLAY AREA ATE/51-90 TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS a c"r wl* WoSh�d %(.:.Iaers s�,d ��or4.t�a 14" (Aclae,��lei ADS (o.1�Q-�a.\ Re-*ix\j on err Gco.ve.l / To IV _T R EN CH D &F[N MzNIMOA �0" GRADE MINIMUM L ATT E R AL LINE _ "' I" 10° ' LATTERAI LINE. REDuC'rloN-TEE . 06/19/2008 11:03 425-670-7258 ESD MAINTENANCE PAGE 05 Walk „ ' . Iiicec�owS Lod sh eal _ 1 z wtv' .S.. Wu. c %NQCi ��� � GrawftA o sd1Q T O 18" rid e �� mod► ° �ooa. . TKSNCN DEPTH tea, ^INVAU A 30" GRADE MI.TJINMvXn MAIN L� N � I. Qi-. iN look. UST OT=*TAIL SCALE; APPROX. IsTi �D LAST 4 f}. Z.X ' Noy GRAV6t Ov►T FAIL w� .4. ;,1.:;; E� _ , f if MACKFitL To JFt, p UTN w2TM"MtNUi rp'k=STING RZP .KAp M 3u��s Drainage Report •IN Edmonds Elementary School Renovation 1215 Olympic Ave Edmonds, WA 1 EXPIRES 9 / 5 / CG Engineering Project No. 07066.20 C 4 =---p ENGINEERING 250 4th Avenue S, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 (425)778-8500 s� E B FEB 19.2008 .._ Scope of Work The goal of this project is to construct an amphitheatre and an asphalt walking path on the Edmonds Elementary School property. The site is located at 1215 Olympic Ave, Edmonds, WA. In the construction of this project, grading will consist of approximately 125 cu. yards of cut and 75 cu. yards of fill. The amphitheatre will be located on the east side of the school property, more specifically on the field north of the east building. Three rows of seating are to be constructed using fifteen 2-1/2'x 2-1/2'x 5' lock block benches manufactured by Ultrablock, Inc. The construction of this amphitheatre will require grading and the construction of a gravel path and stage area. The asphalt walking path will be installed on the northwest side of the school property. The path will encompass the existing soccer field, baseball diamond, and the north half of the lawn on the western side of the property. It will be 6' in width and will be set back 5' minimum from the property lines. Asphalt areas will also be added near the south parking lot of the site. These areas include a 30'x 62' asphalt play area in the location of the existing sand boxes to complete a basketball court and a 5' asphalt walkway west of the parking lot for the safety of school children and busing operations. Drainage Considerations The amphitheatre has been designed to reduce the possibility of ponding. 4" footing drains have been installed behind the bench blocks. These drains will route any runoff to the existing yard drain west of the proposed amphitheatre. The asphalt areas (including the path) that will be constructed on the west side of the site will add approximately 10,900 square feet of new impervious areas. In a meeting with City Engineer Don Fiene, it was confirmed that an equivalent amount of area from the south parking lot would be detained and treated instead of detaining and treating runoff from the new path. Therefore, a 102' detention pipe has been installed near the parking lot. Downstream of the detention pipe, the water will enter an oil water separator to treat the stormwater runoff accumulated in the parking lot. It will then be routed into the existing storm drain which empties into the nearby Hendley Creek. The detention and water quality systems are shown in detail on the plans. ESC Analysis and Design A filter fabric fence will be installed along the entire downhill sides of construction where shown on the plans. The filter fabric fence will be checked periodically during the wet season. It will be inspected during and after any heavy rainfall. Damage will be repaired prior to leaving the site. The fence shall be removed within 30 days after the site has been stabilized. Any disturbed areas resulting from construction or removal of the erosion control measures shall be stabilized. If possible, the clearing and land alteration work will be scheduled in the dry season. Trapped sediment will be removed or stabilized on site. A gravel construction entrance will be placed on Viewland Way prior to any clearing for the new development to minimize truck tire soil tracking. If construction vehicles transport soil and/or debris onto road surfaces, the roads shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of the day. Sediment shall be removed by shoveling and sweeping and transported to a controlled sediment disposal area. Street washing shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this manner. Good management practices shall be considered throughout the project development. Pollutants and wastes such as wood, garbage, concrete debris, pesticides, fertilizers, paint, etc. shall be controlled and disposed of by an authorized authority. All necessary measures will be taken to protect the wetlands located near the northeast and southeast corners of the project site. Attachments • Aerial Photograph • Isopluvial Maps • Tc Calculations • Tc Map • CN Chart • Detention Calculations • Site Photographs • Detention Calculations I, nits -. ! _� �,' '�• - , Immix- #A aI 7_n__a I. / . ✓ n It Mo �!� (�: ��+. 1 it •.1,, 'aj `.;� _-".'r�l,_ J b� . • t _ A _ _ _BU_E4�= � � y - O ItaPD csl Irtc � fiery 9Z0 �d a Dan,( 20�7w,iEQ o Tr•JrNfls, III �, i • _ i - ! _ •.�. 1 1 _—.1. _. 1� I I {it j 1 I i i i i t I 1 I 7I 1 1 •i j i { i j ; r 1 , Description By Date Checked Date ENGINEERING Scale Sheet No. 250 4th Ave. South project Job No. Suite 200 Edmonds, WA98020 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN 124 123 122 121 49 — 25 — 15 a w se soma fo n � sa \ ) BE w is i s OLGA 4 a \ FRIDAY HARBOR PORT STA LEY 30 a a _ 0 MT 11 R( NEB \ / 35 20 1 40 T 5 1 35 302520 15 48 ERETT z. a 15 211 25 C 4 ' 15c s � 30 .5K rs 45 S AT '� fo 35. AT& � r 40 20 45 40 COMA , - >f 2 35 47 \ AB DE N i 30 m �..3 �. 13 — — 25 S 35 f 40 ' 1 • CENT 5 20 w YAKI b 20 o t 45'; I• � i s 35 ,n 'ADA 2 L' t v 46 u 3 45— WASHINGTON p ass , 3, 25 e K PA11t EN E 15 10 0 10 20 30 40 7 --- _� MILES 20l ) , Deno / V. I \ . Figure 25 NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume IX ISOPLUVIALS F 2-YR 24 HR PRECIPITATI N IN Prepared by U.S. Department of C merce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TENTHS OF A INCH National weather Service, Office of Hydrology i I Prepared for U.S. Department of Ai riculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division 124 123 122 121 IIII-1-44 FEBRUARY, 1992 • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN 124 1 124 123 i 123 122 121 r— :A AMS 20-725 BtBN Q PPL - GOLOEND�E / 5 d • SI►lM OAA ATLAS 2, Volume IX Prepared by U.S. Department of C merce National Oceanic and Atmospheric A iministration National Weather Service, Office ofHydrology Prepared for U.S. Department of AgIriculture, (Soil Conservation Service. Engineerog Division 122 121 lli-1-45 rFBRUARY, I'JV2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN 124 123 122 491------- —45 1 80 t � 7 s 4D�\ t f J. NVIA 45 tr 0 f GA 7 5s C FRIDAY HAR UR , .PORT S1ANL• ' 85 3 30 % t 0 ! r.ET� \ b 5 75 ! 3 25 I S51 481 15. rg i ' 2 l'�I .�;� 3 1. i 15. 80 5 45 8S� 1 s f I 90\ w _ —` AMC 10 10q 5 s -`� + I. 40 90�— i 1 r AT 5 N All 55 :� t . cur,: / 1 I 121 EL 1� OC \c�C \ 3 4 / 50 40 tLKll WASHINGTON 40 i 10 P .1 .. EN E 10 0 10 20 30 40 i 40 —� MILES Figure 30 �i NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume IX 45 50 65 prepared by U.S. Department of Cc�nmerce ! ISOPLUVIALS F 100-YR 24-HR PRECIPITATION 55 6U National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration IN TENTHS OF [AN INCH Nationai Weather Service, Office of Hydrology Prepared for U.S. Department of Adriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Engineering Division 124 123 122 121 iiI-1-4ti rEBRUARY, i992 0 • Time of Concentration ( T,) - Existing Conditions for: City of Auburn Existing Conditions Sheet Flow Segment 1 L= 94 ft NS = 0.13 P2 = 1.50 in 2-year So= 0.04 ft/ft Tt = 9.21 min Total = 9.21 min Use 10.00 min C Time of Concentration BY Jared Da" Chu Date 0 ENGINEERING Existing Conditions Scale N.T.S. Sheet No. 250 4th Ave. South I Suite 200 Edmonds,WA98020 Edmonds Elem Job No. 07066.20 Time of Concentration ( Te) - Developed Conditions for: City of Auburn Sheet Flow Segment 1 (Up to 300 feet) L= 60 ft NS = 0.011 asphalt P2 = 1.50 in 2-year So= 0.04 ft/ft Tt = 0.89 min Channel Flow Segment 2 L= 34 ft K = 42 So= 0.020 ft/ft Vo = 5.93 ft / sec Tt = 0.09 min Total = 0.98 min Use = 5.0 min as a minimum value Developed Conditions Assume 5 Minutes Minimum P2 = 1.50 Plo = 2.00 Pioo = 3.00 Time of Concentration By Jared °at Developed Conditions ChW Date ENGINEERING Scale sheet No. 250 4th Ave. South N.T.S. Suite 200 Edmonds, WA9802o Edmonds Elem Job No. 07066.20 POWER LINE - h > ^ - POWER LINE - N \ % YARD DRAIN 1 ^ \ 0TOP=113.091\ � � I POSTS 1 INV=11.79 6" OUT BOT=109.1 MAX TRANSVERSE SLOF E I I I c) FOR WALKWAY 1 1:48, TYP s I .. I I I 1 \ \ A S� / I 0 DO 00 1" cri LAWN ROPOSED s'�ASP ALT ALKW�Y \ YARD DRAIN \ p CP— \ I I I ^ � TOP = 112.95 HUBp& K \ NV=111.95 4"OUT co- 0 \6T=108.65 Py?\'p \ \ I I PROPOSED HALT \ WALKWAY All, yPF' IP DIRT & IGRAVEL I I I 114 �� �� I \ 1 I PLAYI FIELD I I I \ \ ^ I I I s_ / 113 J � I \ I I I II 5 0 MAX LONGI DINAL SLOPE I I I ®I ( I h FOR WALK Y'I� 1t2OJJ �'y',�y{ EX. , E . 10 WATER I 1 YARD DRAIN / \� �,\ `^ 1 I WATER NE L�N� EASEMENT I p SAN. SEWER MH INV= 112.87 GRADE AS:E ECESS Y \EASEM NT RIM 118.13 n IIWIWIIIIIII \ INV=11 8.5 4"OUT �\ 4�H \ ^ INV—I109.23 CTR 8 (/ W W W / N89'39'28"W 107.00' 4' - - i — s CP�6 I o s S ir r543tR p to \ I 132 : , 94.5 j I I I I e S EX. ASPH LT �BBA L o Icri \ I I F I 11 . OD 1 \ U I \ m tt, C n P� 0 / / \ PROP SED 32' Ix sO' 0u W zI CONC ETE ASPH�T PA ENT \ 1 \ I I I \TOP=117.55110 P 6"STL I \ o o I ry INV = 103.66 .o I I 36"0 CONC. = I \ l I IJ -; CP PK AILf PROPOSED 51 ASPHALT WALKWAY I� x ELEV=118.36 O 1\ TO�IATCH PARKING, LOT GRADE = I ^ " m Q / Ing P CONC. WALK 10:1 SLOPE BEYOND WALKW Y °1 30• DI CMP RRISER PROPOSED 57.5 IV 30'�IDIA. I �, D T1ON PIP RE TOR CATCH u TO=116.81 CP-4 2 B/AI yN \ Z INV SW)=115.44 6" f PK NAIL • I I I ,.P;, I I 80=113.a1 I d ELEV=120.71 0 w ''PROPOSED OIL ATER\ }4 , p� �s ROUTE pOSJING DR NTO CO2 SEPERAT V ULT \ D `i1,ON PIPE. b Z \ RI 1= 11s.O \ e 3 \ , — _ I EXIs-n G $r OUTF �I E WEST OF co, C3 1 — 111.3 \ \ �EXISIING A PHALT L14 \ a AERIAL v C.O.`\ 9 \ POWER '19 20 _ N S AL Y \ \ CON,F. CURB 1 / 12' CONC. s _ // � s Pye S ,5 P'-3 `� jA l"'T CCKE STKNJE-BLOM-- + GB®ED sTO t8 D EXISTING DRIVFWAY— STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Table III-1.3 SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban ins... LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A 3 C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush & grasslands 74 82 89, 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land:. undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. Good condition: grass cover on t75% of the 68 80 86 90 area Fair condition: grass cover on 50-75% of 77 85 90 92 the area Gravel roads & parking lots: 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads & parking lots: 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs etc. 98 98 49 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds etc. 100 100 100 100 Single family residential(2): Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre %Impervious(3) Separate curve number 1.0 DU/GA 15 shall be selected for 1.5 DU/GA 20 pervious & impervious 2.0 DU/GA 25 portions of the site 2.5 DU/GA 30 or basin 3.0 DU/GA 34 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 PUD's, condos, apartments, %impervious commercial businesses & must be industrial areas computed (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. III-1-12 FEBRUARY, 1992 • KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface Water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21E 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE -IA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2,24,1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******;r****;r** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .25,85,0,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.0 PEAK-S) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 02 7.83 409 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2pre STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM *** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .25,85,0,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.0 PEAK-�FS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 04 7.83 720 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10pre STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: 1 • S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ***;r:�**:k:k**:r:r�****** S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION ******* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 .25,85,0,98,10 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 85.0 .0 98.0 10.0 PEAK-�FS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 10 7.83 1440 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100pre S.C.S. TYPE-1A RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 2,24,1.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- **:k :k ;r :. ,. ,. .. :r :r •k :'c :k'.r :k*** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ****•'^:k;k;r****:k*:r***** 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. *****•k•k** ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0,86,.25,98,5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 86.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q,(,CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) ��.09 7.67 1161 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 2dev S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 10,24,2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- *:r*;r:r*;r;r***:r******** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0,86,.25,98,5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 86.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK S) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 13 7.67 1610 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 10dev S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) 100,24,3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- *;r:r:r:r:r*,::r**;r**:r:r* S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 0,86,.25,98,5 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 86.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK�FS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 19 7.67 2512 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: 100dev • SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: TANK 2) TANK DIAMETER(ft), STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 3.00, 3.00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .00 4) PRIMARY'DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: 100dev 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(CfS): .07 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: 10dev TARGET RELEASE(CfS): .03 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: 2dev TARGET RELEASE(CfS): .01 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 2, 3.00, 18 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): 0 INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 966 CU-FT , BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS) .01 DIA.= .46 INCHES "Q-ORF" IS CHANGED TO .012 CFS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MIN. ORIFICE OF 0.5" TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2 DIA.= 1.47 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .07 .07 2.99 712 TEST HYD 1: .09 .03 .03 2.13 540 TEST HYD 2: .06 .01 .02 2.04 510 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP a BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS) .012 DIA.= .51 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 1.7 DIA.= 1.37 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .07 .07 2.99 642 TEST.HYD 1: .09 .03 .04 2.03 460 TEST HYD 2: .06 .01 .02 1.77 390 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP a BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS) .012 DIA.= .51 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.2 DIA.= 1.55 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .07 .07 3.00 740 0 TEST HYD 1: .09 .03 .03 2.32 610 TEST HYD 2: .06 .01 .01 2.02 530 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP a BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS) .012 DIA.= .51 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) 2.05 DIA.= 1.48 INCHES PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .07 .07 3.00 716 TEST HYD 1: .09 .03 .03 2.18 550 TEST HYD 2: .06 .01 .01 2.05 520 SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP d PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .13 .07 .07 3.00 716 TEST HYD 1: .09 .03 .03 2.18 550 TEST HYD 2: .06 .01 .01 2.05 520 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D TANK (FLAT GRADE) 2 2y� ':5t-orM RISER -HEAD TANK-DIAM STOR-DEPTH TAN - STORAGE -VOLUME USE 102 Et 3.00 FT 3.00 FT 3.00 FT 101.4 FT 716 CU-FT DOUBLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA(INCHES) _�� HT(FEET) Q-MAX(CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE: .51 .00 .012 TOP ORIFICE: 1.48 2.05 .058 ROUTING DATA: STAGE(FT) .00 .30 .60 .90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.05 2.10 2.40 2.70 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.50 DISCHARGE(CFS) .00 .00 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .02 .05 .06 .07 .54 1.38 2.48 3.78 5.25 STORAGE(CU-FT) .0 37.3 102.0 180.8 267.7 358.3 448.9 521.8 535.8 614.6 679.3 716.6 716.6 716.6 716.6 716.6 716.6 PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: .0 MINUTES/INCH SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP �q ED,y/ CITY OF EDMONDS '^ N 121 5`h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us /pC Iag0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW - STAFF DECISION - T R F ADB-2007-39: Application by the Edmonds School District for a new walking path and outdoor seating area at Edmonds Elementary School, located at 1215 Olympic Avenue in the Single -Family Residential (RS-12) zone. Property Owner: Edmonds School District 15 Edmonds Elementary School 20420 68`h Avenue West Lynnwood WA 98036 Site Location: Applicant: Brian Harding Director of Facilities and Operations Edmonds School District 15 20420 68`h Avenue West Lynnwood WA 98036 1215 Olympic Avenue in the Single Family Residential (RS-12) zone (Attachment 3). Project Proposal: Last year, the Applicant brought an application before the Architectural Design Board (ADB-2006-74) for proposed playground improvements at the Edmonds Elementary School. They ended up omitting a portion of their original application (an outdoor seating area and a new walking path) and decided to phase the project so that they could begin on the rest of the proposed improvements, which was completed in September of 2006. Attached are the ADB meeting minutes from 09/06/06 (Attachment 6). Now, under what the Applicant is referring to as "Phase Il," the proposal includes providing a new outdoor seating area ("amphitheater") in the location suggested by a neighbor and the ADB at last year's meeting, and to also to construct a new walking path around the perimeter of the playfield. The Applicant has described the scope of work proposed (Attachment 3), provided a site plan to show the proposal, which has been highlighted with stars (Attachment 4), and has provided a Playground Improvement Plan that was created by CG Engineering (Attachment 5). The outdoor seating area has been relocated based on what was discussed during "Phase I" of the project by the ADB. Design Review Process: The subject site is in the single-family residential (RS-12) zone, and this project requires General Design Review. Projects that remain under the SEPA threshold are reviewed by staff with the building permit, and the design review is considered an administrative Staff Decision subject to the requirements of ECDC 20.11 (General Design Review), 20.95.040 (Staff Decision — No Notice Required), 16.20 (Single -Family Residential), and the Comprehensive Plan. Page l of • Staff Report for ADB-2007-39 Edmonds Elementary Playground Improvements ("Phase 11") Analysis: 1. Facts: a. The improvements are proposed on property with a single-family residential zoning designation (RS-12). b. Edmonds Elementary School is the primary use of the site. c. Edmonds Elementary is located in the "Single Family -Resource" Comprehensive Plan Designation. The site fronts on several streets, one of which, Puget Drive. Puget Drive is considered a Principal Arterial. d. CG Engineering has stated that they predict that approximately 125 cubic yards of fill and. approximately 75 cubic yards of cut will be graded with this project. The project is under the threshold that would require review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). e. The applicant has stated that the school children and the public are the intended users of the new walking path. L No new landscaping is proposed and none will be removed. g. There is an existing six-foot chain link fence along the western property line. h. The applicant has stated that the walking path has only slight grades on its southern side, which can be accommodated by slight grading and tapering to achieve ADA compliance. i. A goal in the Comprehensive Plan encourages one to "Design the site access and circulation routes with pedestrians' comfort and ease of access in mind" (Page 75, Urban Design — General Objective C.3.a). j. A goal in the Comprehensive Plan encourages staff to "Require that new residential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slopes, soils, geology, vegetation and drainage " (Page 54, goal B.6). k. ECDC 20.11.030.B. I states, "Grading, vegetation removal and other changes to the site shall be minimized where natural beauty exists. Large cut and fill and impervious surfaces should be avoided. " I. ECDC 20.1 1.030.C. I states, "Communityfacilities and public or quasi public improvements should not conflict with the existing and planned character of the nearby area. " 2. Conclusions: a. The outdoor seating area is cut into the slope and reflects the natural topography. b. The walking path is intended for pedestrians, and its path is flat so it will be easily accessible. c. This project proposes minimal grading. d. The change to the character of the site is minimal and will not conflict with the character of the nearby area. e. The project appears to meet the design standards in the code, however all development standards will be reviewed with the building permit.. f. This project meets the design guidelines found in the Comprehensive Plan and the design review chapter of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.11.030. g. A building permit for the proposed playground improvements will need to be approved prior to construction. Page 2 of 3 Staff Report for ADB-2007-39 Edmonds Elementary Playground Improvements ("Phase II") Technical Review: The Engineering Division, Building Division, Fire Department, Public Works Department, and the Parks & Recreation Department have reviewed this application. Brian McIntosh, the Director of the Parks & Recreation Department, stated that this is a "great project. " The Public Works Department stated, "Existing water main under proposed site is scheduled for replacement later this year." Planning staff checked with the Engineering Division, and apparently, the watermain is currently in the process of being installed. The Edmonds School District has given the City of Edmonds an easement for this process. Public Comments: The City has not received any comment letters for this project. Decision: Based on the facts, conclusions, and attachments to this- report, staff finds that the design review for this project (file number ADB-2007-0039) is APPROVED with the following condition: 1. The applicant must obtain a building permit for the proposed work, and individual elements of this project are required to meet all applicable city codes. Attachments: 1. Land Use Application 2. ZoningNicinity Map 3. Scope of Work Letter 4. Site Plan 5. Playground Improvement Plan 6. ADB-2006-75 09/06/06 Meeting Minutes I have reviewed the application for compliance with the Edmonds Community Development Code. qW.-�UyKVA--o Gina Coccia, Planning Division Appeals: 0 8. 09.ti 001 Date The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing appeals, pursuant to ECDC 20.105.010.A, which describes how appeals of a Staff Decision shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project applicant and the date of the decision, the name and address of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong, and the fee. The appeal must be filed with the Development Services Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision being appealed. Appeals are presented to the Hearing Examiner. Page 3 of 3 city of edmonds land use application APR 18 2007 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW FOR OFFICIAL USE' ONLY ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT �¢, /►-7 ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE 103•0-7 REC'DBY �y ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION �� ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE 4� 5'�' RECEIPT # P-BG ` 44 ?P ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE DO ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT ❑ HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB 9ADB ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT t I� - ylA rGhA r9� q,15 Paid ❑ VARIANCE/ REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION 4tip _ adO m411DY ❑ OTHER: 0Y1 51%:!7 PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION Z !S 4FW-0" O�Vd J PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) !.. o �+ 6 i.. .✓r� : t PROPERTY OWNEIF ESU /.S/^ PHONE # V ZS• -V3/J- 70000 / ADDRESS ZDSIZa 99 a:. c..,uc LJ zT7I LNIJNW OQQ� 7�O t36 E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # TAX ACCOUNT # D r%SV b? c;nOO�/ Z SEC. TWP. 2 7 RNG. 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE �L� �I e .�/✓67A�! O/J J�1�00r- S r_QTi �O Q-.g, Q' i APPLICANT/ova PHONE # •3 y1 S- V.3/ %3 y ADDRESS 2 �120 �r//T.h Q�y �.yu �.J c/�QQ��La13o.uo/��r-.ii c e t�eaJ E-MAIL ADDRESS f[avt�I.us p P_ r��., . � sd..+�7t. t AX # �iL s - VJ/ 70�rg' CONTACT PERSON/AGENT PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the be If of the owner as listed/ below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGE DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWN DATE �- /g- This application form was revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 771-0220. 0 Attachment 1 Land Use Application I-ALBRARY\PLANNING\Forms & Handouts\Public Handouts\Land Use Application.doc EDMONDS Brian Harding �, EDANDS SCHOOL DIST T Nreclo, Is FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS 20420 68th Ave. W., Lynnwood, WA 98036-7400 425-431-7334 FAX 425-431-7089 SCH®L http://www.edmonds.wednet.edu D I S T R I C T Includes Brier, Edmonds, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, and Woodway April 18, 2007 To: City of Edmonds From: Brian Harding Subject: Edmonds Elementary playfield improvements ADB 2006-71 and 75 The enclosed drawings illustrate phase II of the Edmonds Elementary playfield improvement project. Phase 1, completed in September, 2006 provided an enhanced play area with new equipment and seating areas, basketball court. The extensive renovation removed approximately six thousand square feet of asphalt to accommodate the new play area with an engineered wood chip safety cushion. The successful completion of phase one provided enhanced safety in one of the state's largest public school play structures Phase II of this project will provide a relocated outdoor seating area and walking path around the perimeter of the playfield. Water mitigation and water quality measures are also incorporated. The new seating area includes drainage connected to an existing systems and features student created ceramic tiles applied to the back rest of the ultra - block seating units. The instructional area provides sufficient area for ADA accessibility and a level accessible route. Thank you for your consideration. Brian Harding Director, Facilities & Operations .OUR MISSION. AHR 1 8 2007 iA 1 1 ENG DIE -PT C.LA Attachment 3 Scope of Work Letter To ADVOCATE for all students by PROVIDING a learning environment which EMPOWERS students, staff and the community to MAJQMIZE their personal, creative and academic potential in order to BECOME lifelong leamers and responsible world citizens. � — -- — .— — ...— -!,W l.- - - - - - - - - CUR NUJ Pt,AYGR.OUWD� MAI wk� 6 ; 4 WAL�V-tk�� 1p cr- W NEW PAVqjL) H cy-)C) " �IPLE HOO' , I-1 DC, T PP P.ALL E rZ ryiLr-A( P EQS KE ti QJ)P 4Q -r MCP (6 LID CL5 u L () 1) T 89. VMjJ(n KMES 'NDPosQ LW ft%rNSAfPf—, ';Vg It ALI J SLNLO *I msw EE \ASW LAM WAY Isr,ALE i,,=,—io7, 6EA\)(-H W Ca) e4sTwb I ! SE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. , • C ,I. E111GIMERM 250 4TN AVE. S_ SUITE 200 ` PHONE (425)1778-B.S900=0 FAX (425) 776-5536 NM9 Ir f '// 1 PROPERTY LINES ARE AT APPROXIMATE LOVCATION& V ,O 1 DRAWN FROM INFORMATION FROM THE PLOT PLAN BY WALDON & DIETZ ARCHITECTS, A.I.A. DATED 4/48/1966. vn/rn I wnAY I I ALL PROPERTY LINES SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY A SURVEYOR v LAWN i F I II 1 1 �•- 1 I I` f o 1 -•�' 1 I 0m \ PROPOSED T \— �I I 11\( 1? I I a N w My ( .) \\ 11 I \ �' i i <, 11 II 1 III m 6 \\ j ��`� j I/ P 16, j \ �11 jIII — C3. oa \ �. I lr I\ j \\ IIII a t e.,n„ \`' 'cc� R -- C \\ \ —iwi, . I \ \ I • \ I L r / \ DESIGN: JPU / DRAWN: JRP CHECK: GAG q;\ I\' a/ \ JOB NO: 07066.20 DATE: 04/06/07 1 OF dMW _ V LIJ 0 Ix 1 I 1 I J I I 1... o� d~ 0 t 50 W t` m W Q Q 2TER/ 0 AS\— . saou111f1 vAaL /.,.C� ..�. _ _ +-ry'y� N N Z • PR 2 8 001 —] 0 � � E LLI LAJ ( • _ _ o VIEWLAND_WAY ' u R/-� - - I '•.�y ~k3 is .3 3�3EPT� SHEET: Attachment 5 C3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN I Playground Improvement Plan scuE a THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSESWITHOUTSIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-0 0-424-5555. • • SE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH` RANGE .3 EAST, W.M. ti C� ENGINEERING \ 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 20 INE0 \ ( PHONE (4 S)t 77 8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 a s CYCLONE FENCE N89_34'28"E-- \ \ NING — \� WALL \ EXISTING\- YARD YARD DRAIN \ DRAIN RIM=130.9 i / GRASS TOP=121.22 \ \:T INV=I1. S2 4"OUT _ GRASS 121.5 BOT=117.2 a \ \ \a0 \ 2 _LAWN A GV/ 41 •c _ \� \ 7W6 AREA P� o?0j \\�\ C OVAL 4T 4/7/07 ------ OffOES 9 7 A27 \ \ \ a: ±540 S.F. GRAMI \ t 7 PLAATER1\ \1 I GRASS \ 5/8•-CRAYFl PA1H \\ C 11iT -- t11Y \ i I 7 PLANTER 13311• _, .•� Z � m I a N 0' r W a nr o w x x n GSGR�AD�NG AND DRAINAGE PLAN o x N x x 20 0 10 20 40 Y SPECIAL TOPOGRAPHIC NOTE 1 0 Q � DESIGN: JPU THIS DRAWING WAS PREPARED WITH AN OLD TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SUPPLIED BY I DRAWN: JRP OTHERS. ALL CRITICAL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CHECK: GAG CIS ENGINEERING IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE BASE DRAWING. JOB NO: 07066.20 l DATE: 04/06/07 ELEV. = 140.4' I � 2z s o' c Ix i o Z 1.1 TOPSOIL FILL Q ZQ —J ELEV. = 137.9 ELEV. = 138.1" J d SIGNATURE TILE _ 4% W PLACEMENT PER SCHOOL S .' Z 5.0' W � INSTALL LOCK -BLOCK BENCH ,,-' Q ELEV. = 135.3' MANUFACTURED BY ULTRABLOCK, INC. _ --' W } W > 1.5 1.0' GRASS SEED ELEV. = t35.5' r EXIST. GROUND a m TYP. TYP. • 2' TOP SOIL (TYP.) 4z - �g I -SURFACE Z a- W I I I f I •I a I 4' FOOTING DRAIN (TYP.) � Z J 3 Q _-- -' 3 SAND p W PROPOSED GRADE _ _ _-_- -_ '- - 4' MIN. CRUSHED ROCK COMPACT TO 95% MIN. 0 t/) to Z p p LA_ ELEV. �'' INSTALL (15)-2 1/2' 2 1/2' 5' x x Z Z '/ " e LOCK -BLOCK BENCH MANUFACTURED BY 0 g -- _2% " •o� ULTRABLOCK, INC.is Q Btr�miiaa�s 688 aga�maoatea gm6Nag'8g8a am •e8e�a8:8 i l I I• I i• I •I �• f J p p ~ d W W (n 2 SHEET: CRUSHED ROCK 4• CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE COMPACT SUBGRADE n SECTION A —A —AMPHITHEATER SEATING AREA C3.2 THESE PLANS HAVF BEEN PRFPARFO FOR AGFNCY RFF\AFW AND ARF 91R,IFU TO CHANCF DO NOT Iff FOR CONWIICTION OR �RIDDINC, PIIRPOV� WITHCNIT WNFD AUNU APPROVAI UAW CAll RFFORF YOII Ill(; 1—Ann-494-5FiS5 0 • FII,E NO. ADB-06-75: Continuance on the application by the Edmonds School District for the Edmonds Elementary Playground and Field Project located at 1215 Olympic Avenue in the Single Family Residential (RS-12) zone. Diana White, 831 North Stream Lane; Brian Harding, Edmonds School District, 20420 68th Avenue West, Lynnwood; and Dave McGlantry, Edmonds Elementary School, were present. Staff Planner Gina Coccia presented the continuation of the application by Edmonds School District for the Edmonds Elementary playground and field project, located at 1215 Olympic Avenue in the Single Family Residential (RS-12) zone. The applicant has provided a revised site plan per the board's request and added dimensions and a legend. The walking path has been omitted and the outdoor student seating area, which was labeled as an amphitheater, is not part of the current project proposal. Staff mailed a courtesy notice to applicants within 300 feet, letting them know about the meeting, and gave them a brief description of the project. She noted that the applicant wishes to make a presentation tonight and answer any questions. Staff recommends approval of ADB-2006-75. Boardmember Schaefer asked if there had been a resolution to the stream setback question. Mr. Bullock explained that it is not an issue because the applicant has withdrawn the portion of the project that deals with the path and the path was the only part of the project that came close to the stream buffer. Diana White thanked the supporters for coming. She introduced Mr. McGlantry and Mr. Harding from the school district. Ms. White reported that the playground equipment is in and is a big hit. She explained that because of the size of the project it was decided after the last meeting to break it up into more manageable pieces and they will not discuss the walking path and the amphitheater this evening but will deal with those at a later time. She noted that the pressing items for them include the playground and expanding the basketball court. She explained that when room was made for the new playground, there were two playgrounds that were combined together and they consequently lost their basketball court. The hope is to get the basketball hoops back and they would like to extend the paving out. The area is 18 by 57, which is an extension to provide enough room for the basketball court. The sidewalk is another issue that they feel is necessary for safety improvements and to make the school a better place. The baseball field improvement proposed in phase one is at the main baseball diamond, and there are existing benches that they would like to remove and replace with low rise, three -tiered bleachers. There are eight park benches, some with backs and some without backs that are two-sided and wide enough for viewing on both sides. There are two benches with backs and many of them without backs that will be located in a popular student pick-up and drop-off area. Little cut- outs or niches have been created for picnic tables. The picnic tables are ADA-accessible, octagon -shaped, and have four posts instead of a single post so that kids will not be able to tip them over easily. A couple of tetherball poles need to be relocated. A new triple hoop shoot was purchased with the playground equipment. The asphalt for the new basketball court is l l by 57 and will allow for installation of the far end basketball hoops. It will be smaller than an average court but should be enough for a game of elementary hoop. The asphalt is for the sidewalk safety improvements. She pointed out that when the middle section was torn out, the maintenance people also tore out the asphalt on the upper section, too, ending up removing about 6,000 square feet of asphalt. The area that they would like to pave is 1,200 feet. Their products have been ordered and are sitting in a warehouse awaiting approval. She hoped that the board would approve and agree with these items and help to complete phase one of the project. Ms. White spoke about the previous location of the amphitheater site and how she had met with Mr. Hertrich and he explained his concerns and had pointed out another location to her that she looked at and liked and decided to go with the new spot. It is in a great area, is quieter, and is more of a natural amphitheater setting. The trees to the northeast will help to provide shade. She thought the amphitheater was great in being an outdoor classroom and learning center Attachment 6 ADB-2006-75 916106 Meeting Minutes and there will be enough room for two classrooms to sit. She reported that Edmonds in Bloom has provided a grant for one thousand dollars and has stipulated that it be used in honor of one of their teachers who had passed away, Mr. Hamilton, and it will be a great way to commemorate his career at Edmonds. Ms. White pointed out that they have met many times with both district personnel and city personnel and felt that the people who were all doing the work were on the same page. She noted that last weekend flyers had been distributed to discuss the new playground and some of the things planned for in the next couple of months, with numbers listed on it to call and e-mail. She had received an e-mail response stating how supportive the School District had been in informing the neighbors of everything that was going on. She said that there are still details on the walking path to be determined before anything definitive can be brought to the ADB, but she hoped that the board would agree to approve the items that can be done to complete phase one. Pro Tem Chairman Utt asked if the proposed walkway would be asphalt paved. Ms. White replied that the proposed walkway would be asphalt paving and it will be separated from the parking. Boardmember Schaefer referred to the removal of about 6,000 square feet of pavement and the addition of a little less than 1,200 square feet for the basketball court and some pavement for the expanded walkway. He wanted to know what the net difference was in terms of paving on the site and all of its phases. Ms. White thought that the walking path was calculated at about 7,000 square feet, but they are considering using pervious concrete. Boardmember Schaefer stated he supported using pervious pavement, particularly for a walking surface. Boardmember Michel thanked the applicant for bringing revised details to the board and felt the project looked great. Pro Tem Chairman Utt discussed the feeling on the board's part before that they were turning down a project that was hurting the kids in the community and he explained that he thought the main reason the project was not approved and carried over to this meeting was because of conflicting information that the board had been receiving. He thought that the applicant had done an excellent job and complimented all of the individual supporters who were present. Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, commented that the school ground improvements has been an excellent effort by the parents and the project has become a success and is the kind of thing that everyone would love to see at their schools. He appreciated the board recognizing the setback situation with this facility and believed that the Edmonds code should reflect something with greater setbacks for major facilities where there is a lot of activity. Even though it may not be a real setback, he felt it was a good setback for buffering private property. He thanked Brian Harding for correcting the checklist that said there was no stream on the property, and pointed out that the city had finally found the stream. Pro Tem Chairman Utt inquired if salmon have found the stream. Mr. Hertrich acknowledged that there are no salmon in the upper reaches and there are a couple of pipes that go downstream. He realized that the condition of the stream was worse than what he had thought it was where it runs from 9'h Avenue down through people's yards. Mr. Hertrich commented that the location of the amphitheater has been a natural bowl for a long time and teachers take their kids outside and the kids play out there in the wintertime and slide down. It will be a little bumpy if something is put in for seating but he thought it buffered the surrounding residential properties well. He did not think there were enough benches and equipment being put in. He thought that if the parents wanted to add more benches in between the playground and the soccer field it would benefit a lot of people. Pro Tem Chairman Utt closed public comments to move into board deliberation. In response to Mr. Utt's regarding the salmon, Boardmember Schaefer stated that there are a number of fish blockages between the property and down to Shell Creek, with significant grade changes that have been there for a long time. 9 0 BOARDMEMBER MICHEL MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER KENDALL, TO APPROVE MINOR PROJECT ADB-06-75 WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. INDIVIDUAL ELEMENTS OF THIS PROJECT ARE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES, SPECIFICALLY AS IT RELATES TO THE HEIGHT AND SETBACKS OF THE BASEBALL BACKSTOP AND BLEACHERS; 2. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO APPLY FOR AND OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS; THE BOARD FINDS THAT WITH THESE CONDITIONS, THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, AND THE PROPOSAL SATISFIES THE CRITERIA AND PURPOSES OF ECDC CHAPTER 20.10 - ADB CRITERIA AND ECDC CHAPTER 20.12 - LANDSCAPING, AND STAFF HAS FOUND THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. •m a m a -.of -.I ams Mild I � I1I Szoog —�--- I ----= — - =T ---=�--J . ---� a te' % 444 I b / F _ �� 91w1 ow lwa `` iy xienam ` ♦ N I / I / I 8 A ` M.BZ.1f.6 'N oo cf. I I _mnm I I / A•CC e �-Co II o A44 mmorNmad OrSi_Y _ M.BZ.ffbBN _ � u 1 - -- —- — — — — — — — — — — — — �_MCB0V-11, 'N "'"'a Y I 00 L01 - - —E - I I Zi I r a II APt't1F,A FL) AS lY OTEI JJ 1 I I� I BY N INEEt3NING CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT I� i IDatQ: � \ WORT{ �LC'A.C7, :-,'AL: A 1A.7—� RER"]9T NUMBER rCt/7f7Nu/�ii{� STREET FILE - — — — — — — — — — �aao t3�nd :: u QED :�i lit nlN 7 DEFIT. -Ld3G ONI.oiinp d7- zp. Renamed Edmonds Elementary in 1990 I't I I I I ILI F3 YCI yox wr yc--. X. jl.F-WLAWC) WA 1nc.189v CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering November 22, 2002 Edmonds School District #15 Edmonds Elementary School Paul Borchert RE: Request to Place Off -Premises Non -Commercial Signs Dear Mr. Borchert, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Off -premises non-commercial signs for library campaign are allowed to be placed within the City right-of-way, pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.60.080B2 and ECDC 18.70. These signs are to be temporary in nature and shall be removed within 60 days. The City of Edmonds is currently in the process of developing a new permit procedure for temporary Street Use and therefore the City Engineer will not require a permit to be obtained at this time. This letter constitutes approval for the placement of signs for the December 2002, book campaign. All future campaigns will require additional approval. Please sign the attached indicating that you understand and agree with the criteria of approval. SinAIDK. GEBERT, PE City Engineer c: Street File — 121 S OlImp i c kve, • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Page 1 of 2 0 kMoKfO5 �M�N'(I`i��(� 1216 OL�MPIG kFi �n APPLICANT: Ii El /`7 D /Vy-S s C['o ©C 5 PROJECT: ,L� (2 0 IC 6,4 /'? , /�,Z G/V LOCATION: M k l D o S NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature, revocable by the City per ECDC 18.70.040 and that no vested right is granted. INDEMNITY: The applicant understands and by his/her signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. CODE APPLICATION: By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s/he has read or had the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and s/he understands that all terms of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth in full and this application and permits therefore are subject to the terms of those Chapters, and has the authority to sign this document for the applicant. SIGNATURE Gi DATE 1 //--)- TITLE: Ll"1 5 �4 /l eo/6", Page 2 of 2 INTERDEPARTMATfCL MEMO DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Gil: STREET FILE March 31, 1987 Gil Braida Bob Brown SCHOOL TRANSITION PROJECT OLYMPIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL R On'March 30, 1987, Bill McKeighen, Hal Reeves, Edmonds Building Department, Gary McComas, Assistant Chief, Edmonds Fire Department, and I walked through Olympic Elementary School for the purpose of identifying our proposed projects in preparation' for moving back into.the school and to address any City of Edmonds concerns. During the course -of the walk through, Bill McKeighen presented and explained the proposed 60-90-100%review process of construction documents to Hal Reeves for major modernization projects in Wave A-1. The following concerns were identified for action: 1. ."Housekeeping," as it relates to loose furniture in designated aisle or walkway areas creates a safety problem. 2. Check exhaust fans for proper operation in restrooms. 3. Current handrail standard needs to be met. - Existing handrails at 36" need to be extended to 42" - Space at bottom of handrail needs to be closed up to not less than a 6" space. 4. Need to check proper operation of exterior.accordian gate at north east corner of north classroom wing. 5.' "Housekeeping" in boiler room will be corrected when present tenants move out. 6. Check fire alarm system operation prior to moving in. - Must conform to annual "confidence" testing. 7. - Need to install an "EXIT" sign at north end of stage. 8. Need to check for adequate combustion air for proper operation of boiler. WNG Supervisors are available for consultation. dk &kt 15 Memorandum to Gil Braida March 31, 1987 Page 2 9. Check all fire extinguishers prior to moving in. 10. Gary will check his inspection files for any additional items. cc: 'Hal Reeves Gary McComas Steve Larson Hal Reasby . Dean Hillhouse Joe Bullard Tom Rodenbough d:mjll2 / afd:gb J 3800 196Th ST. S.W., LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98036.5789 (206) 670.7166 STREET FILE MINUTES OF MEETING SPECIAL MEETING WITH BUILDING AND FIRE OFFICIALS OF DISTRICT 15 Educational Service Center - Board Room 3800 196th Street S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Meeting Date: February 25, 1987 9:00 - 10:30 A.M. Invitees: Al Grajeda City of Brier, Bldg. Off. �H`a1=Reeves -City of=Edmonds;_Bldg: Offs Jack Weinz City of Edmonds, Fire Dept. Dave Alvar City of Lynnwood, Fire Dept. David Saunders City of Lynnwood, Bldg. Off. Duane Hendricks City of Mtlk. Terrace, Fire Dept. Ron DeMars City of Mtlk. Terrace, Bldg. Off. Mary Davis City of Mtlk..Terrace, Ping. Dept. Byron Baxtrom Snohomish Co., Bldg. Off. Stan Smith Snohomish Co., Fire Off. Ron Aldridge Snohomish Co., Site & Land Use Wade Warren Snohomish Co., State Fire Marsh. Kathy Thorsen ESD 15 Hal Reasby ESD 15, Superintendent Gil Braida CPO Bill McKeighen CPO Certain invitees were absent due to a large fire which occurred in the District during the previous evening. The meeting was called to order at approx. 9:00 a.m. by Bill McKeighen of the Edmonds School District Capital Projects Office (CPO). 3. Hal Reasby gave introductory remarks stressing the importance of establishing good communication links between the District and the respective jurisdictions and the opportunity for the cities/county to work cooperatively in remodeling school buildings. Hal. further elaborated on the tight time schedule imposed on the program due to current transition plan. 4. Bill McKeighen handed out an agenda which included information about the phases (WAVES) in the capital program, specific information about projects in "WAVE Al + WAVE A2", the Stadium Seating Project, Outdoor Activity Shelters (OAS), and the Transition Schools Project. district 15 Special Meeting with Building and Fire Officials Meeting Date: February 25, 1987 Page 2 5. Gil Braida introduced the proposed 60-90-100% construction document review process. He indicated the need to obtain building permits as soon as possible upon completion of the various stages of design. 6. The concensus of those attending indicated that the proposed submittal of construction documents at the 60-90-100% completion was an acceptable way to process permit applications. Ron DeMars commented that the proposal was sound, but cautioned the group that they not be asked to redesign the portions facility which may be incorrectly designed by the District's architect. The examiner's role and responsibility are that of plans review, not design. 7. Life/Safety a. Fire alarms must be installed in portables City of Lynnwood. b. Inspection of HOST schools in the transition plan was requested. C. Sprinkler systems may be required for the buildings. d. Architect to provide sprinkler drawings at the 60-90-100% document completion if code requires sprinkling of building. 8. Walk Throughs The building officials and fire officials will be offered a walk through the buildings with the architect in order to point out areas that will need code compliance retrofit. This should be done before schematic design for both transition schools and major modernizations. This will assist the architect in conforming to each jurisdiction's codes and requirements. 9. Drawing Submittal It was recommended that the District attempt to submit 60-90-100% drawings during the period October through February. Included with the construction documents, should be a set of as -built drawings showing existing conditions at each building. HY.A.C. as well as fire damper locations is important. The architect should show ALL improvements on plans/drawings - specifications are NOT to be the sole indicator of improvements. Drawings should also go to State electrical inspector. The Snohomish County Health District (Environmental Health) ought to receive drawings. Special Meeting with Building and Fire Officials Meeting Date: February 25, 1987 Page 3 10. Special Requirements Grease separators at schools where food is prepared should be included in the building program. Surface water run-off should be addressed. 11. Inspecting Agencies a. Snohomish County Health District. b. State Electrical Inpector - each city (City of Mountlake Terrace does their own electrical inspection). C. Building departments - each city. d. Fire departments - each city. 12. Follow-up Items a. Time lines for requesting variances. b. Review periods of the Planning Commissions, Boards of Adjustment, and Boards of Public Works. Attachment cc: Invitees (w/attachment) Mayor, Brier Mayor, Edmonds Mayor, Lynnwood Mayor, Mountlake Terrace Mayor, Snohomish County d:bmck0l afd:gb -, PRESENTATION TO LOCAL BUILDING AND FIRE OFFICIALS - DISTRICT 15 FEBRUARY 25, 1987 AGENDA INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AREAS TO BE ADDRESSED THE CPO AND ITS PURPOSE - OWNER'S REP. ROLE AND FUNCTION OF LIAISON PURPOSE PRESENT THE CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM IDENTIFY KEY TARGET DATES ASK FOR HELP IN ACHIEVING OBJECTIVES INTRODUCE THE 60 - 90 - 100% REVIEW CONCEPT ESTABLISH COMMUNICATION LINK WITH AGENCIES OVERVIEW WAVE Al & A2 1986-89 $28 M 8 PROJECTS WAVE B 1988-91 $34 M 8 PROJECTS WAVE C 1990-93 $30 M 8 PROJECTS WAVE D 1992-95 $29 M 6 PROJECTS TOTAL $121 M 30 PROJECTS • • WAVE Al PROJECTS BEVERLY ELEMENTARY SPRUCE ELEMENTARY ALDERWOOD MIDDLE MEADOWDALE MIDDLE WAVE A2 PROJECTS BRIER ELEMENTARY LYNNDALE ELEMENTARY MTLK. TERR. ELEMENTARY WESTGATE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT STADIUM OUTDOOR ACTIVITY SHELTERS BRIER CEDAR VALLEY CHASE LAKE COLLEGE PLACE EVERGREEN HAZELWOOD HILLTOP LYNNWOOD MEADOWDALE OAK HEIGHTS SHERWOOD HOST SCHOOL OLYMPIC ELEM. SNOLINE ELEM. MTLK. TERR. MID. MADRONA MID. HOST SCHOOL MADRONA MID. OLYMPIC ELEM. MTLK. TERR. MID. SNOLINE ELEM. (ALL ELEMENTARY ) TRANSITION (HOST) SCHOOLS OLYMPIC ELEMENTARY SNOLINE ELEMENTARY MTLK. TERR. MIDDLE MADRONA MIDDLE MARTHA LAKE ELEMENTARY "WAVE A" PROJECTS TRANSITION AND MODERNIZATION FACILITIES BY JURISDICTION JURISDICTION M.A.C.C. CITY OF EDMONDS SPRUCE ELEMENTARY WESTGATE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT STADIUM CHASE LAKE ELEM. (O.A.S) OLYMPIC ELEM. (TRANSITION) TOTAL M.A.C.0 $ 4,504,000 CITY OF LYNNWOOD BEVERLY ELEMENTARY LYNNDALE ELEMENTARY MEADOWDALE MIDDLE MEADOWDALE ELEM. (O.A.S.) COLLEGE PLACE ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) CEDAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) LYNNWOOD' ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) TOTAL M.AX.C. $ 8,008,000 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ELEMENTARY .EVERGREEN ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) MTLK. TERR. MIDDLE (TRANSITION) TOTAL M.A.C.C. $ 2,666,000 CITY OF BRIER BRIER ELEMENTARY TOTAL M.A.C.C. $ 1, 845,000 0 "WAVE A" PROJECTS TRANSITION AND MODERNIZATION FACILITIES BY JURISDICTION - CONTINUED JURISDICTION M.A.C.C. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ALDERWOOD MIDDLE OAK HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) HAZELWOOD ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) HILLTOP ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) SHERWOOD ELEMENTARY (O.A.S.) MARTHA LAKE ELEM.. (TRANSITION) SNOLINE ELEMENTARY (TRANSITION) MADRONA MIDDLE (TRANSITION) TOTAL M.A.C'.C. $ 3,881,000 TIMELINES PROJECTS WAVE Al 60 % REVIEW MID SEPTEMBER, 1987 90 % REVIEW MID NOVEMBER, 1987 100 % REVIEW MID DECEMBER, 1987 BID PROJECTS MID DECEMBER, 1987 AWARD BID END OF JANUARY, 1988 PERMITS AVAILABLE BY JANUARY 31,1988 CONSTRUCTION BEGINS FEBRUARY, 1988 WAVE A2 60 % REVIEW MID DECEMBER, 1987 90 % REVIEW MID FEBRUARY, 1988 100 % REVIEW MID MARCH, 1988 BID PROJECTS MID MARCH, 1988 AWARD .BID END OF MAY, 1988 PERMITS AVAILABLE BY JUNE, 1988 CONSTRUCTION BEGINS JUNE, 1988 STADIUM 60. % REVIEW SUMMER OF 1987 90 % REVIEW SUMMER OF 1987 100 % REVIEW SUMMER OF 1987 BID PROJECT END OF.SEPTEMBER, 1987 AWARD BID END OF OCTOBER, 1987 PERMITS AVAILABLE BY NOVEMBER, 1987 ..CONSTRUCTION BEGINS NOVEMBER, 1987 (AFTER FOOTBALL SEASON) TIMELINES - CONTINUED PROJECTS OUTDOOR ACTIVITY SHELTERS 60 % REVIEW EARLY APRIL, 1987 90 % REVIEW MID APRIL, 1987 100 % REVIEW END OF APRIL, 1987 BID PROJECT END OF APRIL, 1987 AWARD BID MID MAY, 1987 PERMITS AVAILABLE BY MAY 31, 1987 CONSTRUCTION BEGINS MAY 31, 1987 w 4i BUILDING AND FIRE OFFICIALS SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 JURISDICTION CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING OFFICIAL HAL REEVES 775-2525 FIRE OFFICIAL JACK WEINZ 775-2525 CITY OF LYNNWOOD BUILDING OFFICIAL DAVID SAUNDERS 775-1974 FIRE OFFICIAL AL DILLON' 775-1974 CITY OF MTLK. TERR. BUILDING OFFICIAL RON DeMARS 776-1161 FIRE OFFICIAL DON GARBERG 776-1161 CITY OF BRIER BUILDING _OFFICIAL AL GRAJEDA 775-5440 FIRE OFFICIAL DON GARBERG ' 775-5440 CITY OF WOODWAY BUILDING OFFICIAL JIM HANSEN 542-4443 FIRE OFFICIAL JACK WEINZ 542-4443 COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH BUILDING OFFICIAL BYRON BAXTROM 259-9311 FIRE OFFICIAL STAN SMITH 259-9311 PLANNING DATA - Signs -- ST'�L°"T FILE " n' Colors Proposed: Acceptable? - Requires ADB Approval? g a Loptron If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a .fence) meets setbacks? rl/Ll R fired S--63cks iJA Street: Side: Side: Rear: Rctua[Setbacks —T—Rear: Street: Side: Side: Land-scapif 7gfair Size: It> Location: Critical Areas Determination ❑ Study Required Waiver Other 1 + rAA.L.'l \�IL `�' `l i �( ✓� �J /l.2- C rj�, cJ.•�g.� SdLv $ r I� S / _ L \ SS' T �_ — � ��. �,.� P (��- Ste-dam.•-�,C S - ,s/;,, s� �:s �' Plan Review By: PLANNING DATA S7'R��T' FIB -- Sign5 -- Name: CJ vim(::" i S C (2�u �`I �.�_ Date: I O �4 f! - Site Address: 1 2 l S O ( Avg Plan Check #: BLDZoI �128 "1 Project Description: ,:s4c. t 3 x(ckj'a- Ave Reduced Site Plan Provided:(YES / NO) Zoning: 5 _ Z Comprehensive Plan Designation: Map Page: Corner Lot: / NO} Flag Lot: (YES k�n ADB File # (or date waived): lJ� TOTAL Area.. r 7ype of Sign Type of Sign Allowed in ? zone _ Matrix conditions met? Allowed area per unit . Unit TOTAL sign area allowed for this si n Proposed sign area Example Wa11. w/intemal i/luminaG'on Yes, with conditions Yes 1 sq- ft Il neat ft attached' wall 41 ft. attached wall 41 square feet 20 square feet Sign # L Sign #2 Sign #3 TOTAL Sign Area for Tenan4/5ite Max Permitted: Z Sg _ � _ Previous Total: PS/A 11 Proposed Total: I Sign Height Sign Type: F.,—sA--e, o ,, � Max Permitted: 3 Actual Height: 3 Sign Type: t Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sin Li hdi7 Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: i i• 4 a c .. .a :{` �z ?_a-'-- dT �,t.,4c.,a� `• L1:'r�' �i i r,. 0,_ - _ .. r -1, 'i .. . _ \� y+�, +3Y •w� �-`'.st` �i`rR�� _ i -ys �-��;�y���l`. "'� ; � 5. !�":'.�: av .: S '�� _�.�._..•--'>'I (�Vj �f� ,,— 1 :,�•- LJ (r_}lyY�p� �r 1�_ {1 �t �i1r�• i� J t^�-i.`A ,�S >i" ,s' T §'`••u.+' \\� _ �F_"=J_",V- "'ti-•�.� -- ..�-+-�Y_. _:�'1� ff �r�=l ( C t � I axru �,.klift .;�"F�an.`- ..y^f.YC r�' ! �V-` .o}`� ti:. �� �� '• _ __ _ _ '�---, - 1a�_a_,. - - - _ s►v._.;x. c� s k�:'3:, it SlY-E4"'to L' f�,q �: br,?"rl `\� \� ;r _ ---- - _; _ �.. Y _- ` "f•$ �:"t �^.A. •;3:.`5,� ,.�.i l ?,dfsbb--',i:ji ','.j; �i� `� r�.. ° - -' ci,.� ��� ,� 5, sS'� ..• v... ;c c °''fir;. Yam: �»�'•`�i .� •'� Y �c� ��. a . ! _ �s rr ��� - k ?-�� �, ;..(iY$ a- •,i�l�' '3^�,..iV#:� ��.�`c�� 4� �� tat`.-.sY :{ � t f ,�.� y �� = L 4:f. ,�£ � � s; �?,:'� a. �i,� =&. n : c4� a �1 �'7 S` sr� •ec' y5�v^ � 3 � \ � S� �(/� ( � _ Y - 1}•� r� `r ^ _ �1 ^-�� �.•^ ,��r-1. sSP".. �ps� ti.1.�c. .F ��;'� �'3;�,��� .'� .; t� 4�- .<- \\ g �: ST .j-� :1 f { s`- •• �.: — '+' F - �,..i`n', } �i �-�� '§ �� , r.�'.AoiJr5' �ifl �:- •'r .r•-� � �i`+ -�.♦ fib: -"-yam. t� � �t�'ii. b� { � �I� ,i � r n ai .. - • ,Y�-• T� 1 �.V. u __' - __ . i•. 0 s a .• r '$1'R...P 'i .ti' *:..� r�� ;• n �-_- �J - J �a- � J�' ice, t C { E,. 37 c �. .• ,,•. e ,,. .�':C � ,, �;' , '- 7 - o ( �"? ter: .r • _ ac %.�ry.. a Edmonds.a Elements — ` = N� f ;New Sign Location a -, x.."''i - '-� - r'..r. i. �...w•-: �y}'1 .s ,r i y7`� pry 2- ,g' , J X, `' s-.'�r •- -,fir - ��.-_ x . •-Y T- , - , »; «. - -t�;�. '�� ta§x �; u � � �.- - � T• .: 1 --- ; _ _ ` � ) ` T„�.Sp�,.._� � __ Vsewla 4 •- � .a , `i..t r t � \ N � � (• f 1 c' i • � r - _j \ �� c { d r, J r, �` �' �c� �—_1'-• -.� .,:.. ` � .i -.l, 9 T•'- .%' f..`` fit, t - � �/�,-+-�]' \ �A - . • � �..-.. 1. 1 i nQ` a -. �y. • Y '"4�.. �1 .<� y� _-•�+.�>�i' y � T���"3..^ .I - e t, � .�tn C �� � � 4" �!' � __ •. __l \ y � � _ - C� Ci G - 1 \, EDMONDS ELEMENTARY 1 EACH - 32" x 72" x 18" D/F NON -ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN COLOR WITH 3 ROWS OF 4" BLUE READER BOARD COPY AND LOCKING KEY VANDAL COVER. 3/16" LEXAN FACES WITH VINYL COPY AS SHOWN. - INSTALL ON 3" TALL FOUNDATION Lurnin-Art Signs, Inc. 4320A South Adams St. Tacoma, Wa. 98409 ph: 253475-5252 • fax: 253-4750-272 www.luminar signs.com • nancy@luminartsigns.com BLACK TO MATCH INTENSE BLUE (?MS 301) WHITE ALL GROUNDING AND BIOM IN. IN"'A!, OkaANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 NEC EDMONDS ELEMENTARY EDMONDS PROJECT NAME I LOCATION MONUMENT WITH READER BOARD AND VANDAL COVER DESCRIPTION 3/4"=1' 9124/15 NANCY BRAEDT SUNDAY McMICHAEL SCALE DATE SALES, DESIGNER COMPANYICLIENTSIEDMONDS ELENTARY/3X6 PYLON R092415.CDR Approved for Production 1 SALES DATE © COPYRIGHT 2010. This design is the sole property of Lumin-Art Signs, Inc. Reproduce only by expressed, written permission from Lumin-Art Signs, or a payment of $1,000.00 for each application of this artwork. OCT 0 2 2015 OPMENT SEHVIL;ES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS FILE NAME w N Fabrication Details ® MONOLITHIC CONCRETE FOOTING CEOVED ® EXISTING GRADE OCT 0 2 2015 NEW TOPSOIL TO BE PROVIDED BY E.S.D. uEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. ® CITY OF EDMONDS G Q O O O e Graphic Details GENERAL NOTES: REVISIONS �� t SIGNS Et GRAPHICS a of j 9 RKF ` PROJECT MANAGER DUSTIN DEER CELL:206.636.6990 OFFICE:425.828.0177 FAX: 206.922.5572 Him innanincinncnrn Edmonds Elementary School REV DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED DESCRIPTION Concrete Footing for Reader Board SIGN TYPE CF SHEET /- CF - q 1 / ❑ 99.9 fl r - VIEWLAND WAY _ II t of I Existing School Building) Edmonds Elementary 34719 S.F. Site Fence ri ECE-JvE OCT 0 2 2015 0EVEWFMeN7 SERVICES CiX CITY OF EDMONDS Existing Site Fence Existing 8'x2.5' wooden i freestanding sign to remain per ECDC [ 20.60.095 New 6'x3' metal reader -board to be installed. Top of sign to be no more than 3' above grade. See anached I drawings for details. ° Sign to be installed in accordance with ECDC 20.60.025 B.4 and ECDC 20.60.045 sign area for BN zone New topsoil w/ grass to be installed to level grade below sign. W o QI d U m Existing Parking Lot li 3 a ° R J ay O m a ISM ° W R.O.W. 1 in = 20 ft NORTH EDMONDS Edmonds School District 15 Edmonds Elementary, New Reader -Board Site Plan Date: September 28th, 2015 Capitol Projects Office Contact: I Drawn By: WILT 20420 68th Ave W File: Partnership 2015, / EE Sign Lynwood, WA 98036-7400 Will Thomsen: 425-431-7162 SCH®L thomsenw@edmonds.wednet.edu DISTRICT