The URL can be used to link to this page

1215 VIEWLAND WAY.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII 13558 1215 VIEWLAND WAY November 20, 1996 Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 ATTENTION: Mr. Art Schroeder Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Exploration, Analysis and Design Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Way Jk- Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Dear Mr. Schroeder: As requested, Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (Giles) has completed a geotechnical engineering exploration, analysis and design for the above referenced project. A brief description of the project and scope of services are included in the following paragraphs. Giles' scope of services for this project included subsurface explorations, geotechnical analysis, and recommendations for repair and stabilization of the slide area. The geotechnical design includes information for the owner or insurance company to obtain bids from contractors for the emergency slide repair. The report and plans were prepared for submittal to the City of Edmonds for permits. The results of our field exploration and laboratory testing were utilized in a geotechnical engineering analysis to provide the following information: • Determination of generalized subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and engineering characteristics at the site. • Design recommendations for repair of the slide. • Soil and rock material types, placement and compaction recommendations. • Subgrade preparation recommendations. 0 Plan and cross-section view and quantity estimate for the recommended repair. Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Drive Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Page No. 2 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION The subsurface exploration program consisted of two test borings. Borings B-1 and B- 2 were drilled to a depth of 12 %2 and 21 Meet, respectively, below existing ground surface. The borings were completed with hand -portable equipment at the base and top of the slopes as shown on Figure 1. The field exploration consisted of performing Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) in general accordance with ASTM:D-1586 specifications at 2 Moot intervals throughout the first 15 feet, and 5 feet thereafter, and/or at each major change in subsurface characteristics. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2 inch outside diameter split -barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140 pound hammer free -falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler through each of three 6 inch penetration intervals is counted and the total number of blows struck during the final 12 inches is considered the Standard Penetration Resistance, or "blow count." If a total of 50 blows is struck within one 6-inch interval, the driving is ceased and the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the actual number of inches of penetration. The resulting Standard Penetration Resistance values (N-values) provide a measure of the relative density of granular soils and the relative consistency of cohesive soils. An experienced geotechnical engineer from our firm continuously observed the boring, logged the subsurface conditions, obtained representative soil samples, and transported the samples to our laboratory for further classification and testing as deemed necessary. Conventional field and laboratory testing was performed on the materials encountered in the test borings to determine their classification, strength, compressibility, permeability and other characteristics typically used in evaluating design and general construction considerations. Laboratory testing included two grain size determinations, and several moisture content determinations. Grain -size distribution curves were generated from two sieve analyses performed on selected samples The attached boring logs describe the various types of soils encountered in the boring, based primarily on visual interpretations made in the field and supported by our subsequent laboratory testing of selected samples. Our logs also indicate the approximate depth of the contacts between different soil types, although these contacts may be gradational or undulating. Where a change in soil type occurred between sampling intervals, we inferred the depth of contact. In addition, our logs indicate the Standard Penetration Resistance at each sample Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Drive Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Page No. 3 location, and any laboratory tests performed on the soil samples. Depth to groundwater is also indicated on the boring logs, where applicable. Groundwater depth is typically estimated from the moisture content of soil samples, the wetted height of the drilling rods, and/or the groundwater level measured in the boring after the auger has been extracted. SOIL CONDITIONS The generalized soil profile encountered at the borings included near -surface deposits of silty, fine sand apparently derived from filling activities during previous site development. Boring B-2 was advanced at the top of the slope through a block of soil showing evidence of recent downslope movement and recealed this apparent fill to extend to a depth of approximately 6 Meet. Apparent fill depth of Boring B-1 was estimated at approximately 5 feet. Below the fill, the borings encountered a dense, fine to medium sand known as the Esperance deposit. This material was deposited as Vashon glaciers advanced and was subsequently overridden by several thousand feet of glacial ice. As a result of this over consolidatoin, the Esperance deposit exhibits high shear strength characteristics. Groundwater was not encountered at boring location B-2. At B-1, water was encountered at a depth of approximately 7 '/2 feet and rose to a level of 3 feet below the surface after drilling. Soil density as revealed by blow counts and groundwater conditions suggest that the upper portion of B-1 may have been advanced through backfill for a drainpipe reportedly installed in the area. The groundwater which was encountered may have been perched within fill soils above the contact with the dense native sands. The slide removed the majority of fill soils and colluvial'deposits from the slope face exposing the dense Esperance sands. A block of this fill remains at the top of the slope near B- 2 as shown on Figure 1. This block shows evidence of downslope movement estimate at approximately 18 inches. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED REPAIR The slide which occurred on the property removed an estimated 3 to 4 feet of fill and colluvium from the slope. This exposed the underlying dense Esperance sands which approximately follow the contours of the existing slope which averages 40 degrees. Some small gullies and rills were eroded into these sands from water which flowed down the slope from a broken sprinkler pipe following the slide. The dense, native sands are considered stable against large-scale earth slides. However, repair of the slide area will be necessary to restore Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Drive Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Page No. 4 the slope to some semblance of its original condition to protect the soils from further erosion, to buttress surrounding slope soils, and to mitigate aesthetic concerns. The preferred repair will involve filling the gully formed by the slide to restore the slope to near its original contours. The replacement fill will consist of 4 to 8-inch quarry spalls which would have characteristics required to remain in place on the 40 degree slope. Other materials would not reliably perform at this inclination. Preparation of the slide area prior to reconstructing the slope will consist of the following steps. Once temporary erosion control measures have been installed (per Figure 1), all vegetation except trees greater than 8 inches in diameter should be removed from the slide area as delineated on the plan. Ornamental shrubs should have the roots balled and should be stored for replanting at owner's discretion after repairs have been made. All remaining loose fill and soils should then be removed from the slide area to expose the underlying dense sands as directed by the Geotechnical Engineer. The area below the pile -supported deck should not be disturbed. In addition, no equipment should be allowed on this deck. At the top of the slope, in the area surrounding Boring B-2, a block of soil has shown evidence of downslope movement of up .to 18 inches. This "sliding block" is delineated on Figure 1. Movement of the block has created tension cracks at the top of the slope and led to damage of small landscaping rockeries. These rocks should be temporarily removed from the work area for replacement following repair of the slope. Depth of the sliding block is estimated at 5-to-6 '/2 feet based on visual assessment and information gathered at boring B-2. Stabilization of this block of soil will require removal of a portion of these soils. However, removal of the entire block, which would impact landscaping and walkways at the top of the slope, is not considered necessary. It is recommended that soils be removed to form a smooth contour between the toe of this block (at approximately elevation 280) and top of the slope, elevation 302. Estimated volume of soil removal for this portion of work is 35 cubic yards. Removal of this soil, combined with the addition of spalls at the toe of this block is considered adequate to stabilize this area. Once a suitable subgrade has been exposed, as determined by the Geotechnical Engineer, the dense sands must be keyed and benched prior to placement of quarry spalls. Keying and benching details are shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2. Location of the benches will be determined by field conditions. However, it is estimated that a minimum of 4 benches cut into the dense sands will be required and should be evenly distributed between the top and bottom of the slope. The maximum vertical height of the benches should be about 4 feet. Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Drive Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Page No. 5 Width should be no less than 4 feet. The keyway at the base of the slope may encounter a 6- inch drain pipe reportedly installed in this area. If encountered, the pipe should be returned to its original condition. Quarry spalls will be placed on the prepared subgrade and in the keyway. The estimated volume of spalls required for the project is 350 cubic yards. The estimated average thickness of spalls required to return the slope to pre -slide contours is approximately 3 feet. This dimension will vary according to field conditions but should not be less than 8 inches. A new 3-foot high rockery will be constructed at the toe of the slope as shown on the plan. The ends of the rockery will taper out of each end outside of the slide area. The rockery will be founded on the quarry spall, keyway backfill. The rockery should be constructed in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements. Backfill behind the rockery drainage course will consist of common fill soil compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. Once quarry spalls are in place on the slope, the spall backfill will be covered by a minimum of 6 inches of common fill soil. This soil could consist of excess soil generated on the site. The slope should then be hydroseeded, covered with jute matting and then covered with visqueen until the hydroseed vegetation has become established. The Planting Schedule on the plan should be consulted for other planting requirements. A 2x2 gravel drain was installed previously at the toe of the slope. As part of this project approximately 150 lineal feet of this drain will be uncovered and restored to functional condition. Also, the yard surrounding the house at base of slope will be regraded to promote drainage away from the structure and into this drain. Water at the top of the slope should be diverted away from the slope face to a suitable discharge point. All equipment access for repair work will be from the base of the slope. Therefore, placement of spalls to the top of the slope may require construction of a temporary bench midway up the slope for equipment access, use of a crane or other methods. Intermittent construction monitoring by a Giles representative is expected to be required to confirm that construction proceeds in accordance with the design covered in this report. Emergency Slide Repair 1215 Viewland Drive Edmonds, Washington Project No. 6G-9610009 Page No. 6 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to call. c:\working\beresford.wpd Sincerely, MONTE M. REINDERS Staff Engineer II JOHN E. ZIPPER, P.E. Northwest Regional Manager pRpFT BROWNBAY o PI. 7 FREpERICK / 1 9TM PL A� • � OVERLOOK PK e= . .a sr. em Rmo s Q� . PL SY a iBSTN itBSTH pp yy G BI' 1 M/1T �.tti PK R 1B7M PL 511 1870 ST SN O yi pF IBM u 'T � wm I JPE 89TR$ SM M;Iw. \Vv\ R B WE PL 1 yT Sw '< 19DTM T SM ST < qRESTF La A I w Y II I y r ` stxR �C8 ` FYa,_ n a nnx s s n g E" 19 ST SW a MELODY LN PIKkr PUGEWY F� ��-• W HIRDLET @ BROBKMERE zaa R - - BROORMEIIE EIMRD tmo ST -_ z s ✓n ELS//__t-11;:ASP s _ ST = < --- sT�'mUNOERUAFRNATERxttv�R �y� sy F ' --- < A I TMER x STA 800 ER WY Ti$ xanxi u VISTA > >t 200TH ST SW p 83t ❑ ' BLACK e < SIERRA` m BEACH '� + t T < lJ� GLEN ST y�y 241 ST s — a C zdq 1 '^ ST o m. .r 1 .. SPRAGU , 9 i r,su� uer 4 $ PD Jr rm D ELL 2 ST HILL PK' _ Eu °" g206TH I N a rt , a �� aR6 1 ST Ff vL sr m \ s nn y - q ` 209 PL MARINA 23 R MAPLE Q r UNION 1< w z AW i i" „ F! s a IS 4212TH _ 1� OIL HONELL L CEDAN Sf 4'Opt ' PAwcry < L ST Sr BT .�� Q 1� m u- < �PAIICE ST l € G PIOM1Lp JryEI, 2I/1M Pl SIR 2U)11_ST_ 3Y-1 O t IRMIICR M F <' 1 n ELMON0.S P M BR IALMEL nsTx 215TM uyowr ST 1 s 1 sr a° nsM BFACH 4 Pi leiHAIUM N� 1 FF wPs✓ i® i 1 r 1' 217TH ST '< � � �' e� sw BBM < G k" FI < F u v� @ zITM y FIR n F R ST '< ° aeM I 218TM ST SY _ 26 BELLA COOLA Q e mo a u y e' x j _ EIH` m 5 19M 1 a I a _ 30'� I zF = ? 119M Sf - $ _ EL" ST E ST 22 TH ✓: s ST < SW TOD 09 MsinPI A� 0OGjR -x-'y ft 5 RCH BIRCH TrsnPn?s <� ^ xw i .. AQ a a "... l r 1 A4 caswlm S r Figure 3 - Site Location Map 1215 Viewland Slide Edmonds, WA GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIINTES, INC. GEOTECHNICAI, ENVIRONMENTAL Project No. 6G - 9610012 AND CONMUCTION MATERIALS CONSUITAM L t� EXISTING TWO—STORY HOUSE Regrade back and east yards of residence to promote drainage away from foundation. Slope to 2' X 2' gravel drain. Excavate and backfill keyway as shown on Figure 2 — �y � Project Notes 1. Clearing limits are 5 feet outside of delineated slide area. No clearing or excavation is allowed beyond the clearing limits. 2. Temporary erosion control measures shall be installed prior to performing any grading activity. Erosion control measures shall consist of silt fence and straw bales placed downslope from all work areas and shall be maintained throughout the duration of the project to prevent silt and/or silt laden water from leaving the work area. Erosion control shall conform to all applicable ordinances. 3. All trees greater than 8 inches in diameter shall remain. 4. Remove and ball roots of ornamental trees and shrubs within slide area for replanting. Replanting of existing landscaping shall be at performed at direction of the respective property owner. 5. Existing structures at the top of slope shall not be distubed. No equipment will be allowed on the pile -supported deck at the top of the slope. 6. Remove rockeries as required within clearing limits. Replace to original configuration. 7. All access to the top of slide shall be coordinated with the property owner. 8. Access to bottom of slope shall be limited to an area delineated by the property owner. 9. Rockery construction shall conform to City of Edmonds requirements. 10. Quarry spall backfill shall conform to WSDOT spec. 2-03.3(14) 11. Placement of jute matting and clear plastic (visqueen) shall conform toWSDOT specifications 8-01.3(8) and 9-14.5(3) 12. Dispose of all soil and materials at approved, permitted off -site location. Planting Schedule Plant 10-foot buffer behind new rockery as follows: 5 Vine Maple 5 Photinia Hydroseed slope per Figure 2 CLUMP M R/R TIE RETAINING WALL. A f — Uncover and restore 2' by 2' gravel drain. Approximately 150 lineal feet. �. B-1 Construct new rockery 3 feet high. Field locate at toe of slope. Taper rockery at ends outside of slide area. i See Project Note #9 for rockery construction details. 0 MAP! E STUMP IT CONTOUR LINES 9E! ' I Slide outline. Fill with quarry spalls to elevations shown on Figure 2 (average thickness 3 feet). Minimum spall thickness throughout slide area shall be 8 inches. Approximate quantity of spalls: 350 cu. yd. Clearing limit Sliding soil block. Remove soil as directed by Geotechnical Engineer to form smooth contour from toe of block to top of slope. / Estimated volume: 35 cu. yd. STRUCTURE OVERHANGING CONCRETE STRUCtLIRE OUTLINE 90TOM ELEVATION OF STRUCTURE = 209.45' �i 1 215 VI EWLAN D WAY FIGURE I - PLAN VIEW LEGEND ® B-1 Approximate Soil Boring Location VERTICAL DATUM EDMONDS SEWER DATUM • ',GILES CNGIf1EER1NG l /SSOCIATESJNC. GEOTECHNICAL GEOENVIROMMENTAL M AND CON9RUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS t .1 310 i 300 290I 280 1 2701 2601 250r 240 230 f 220 ' Offset varies 2 to 12 feet left. e ground surface arty spall backfill. Match pre -slide contours. any spall backfill shall conform to WSDOT Spec. 3.3(14) /// Cover quarry spalls with 6 inches (minimum) of "common" fill soil. Hydroseed immediately and cover with jute matting. Cover jute matting with clear plastic (visqueen) until vegetation becomes established. Placement of jute matting and clear plastic shall conform to WSDOT specs. 8-01.3(8)and 9-14.5(3) \ L _ \ Bench (typ.) - Bench subgrade into dense sand. Field \ Existing ground surface at Section A - A' locate 4 (minimum) benches as directed by Geotechnical Engineer. Maximum vertical bench \ height is 4 feet LEGEND B-1 Depicts subsurface exploration GLoose, wet, brown silty fine SAND (Fill) ODense, moist, -brown silty fine to medium \ Backfill rockery at rio steeper than 2H:1 V. Provide �\ \ soil for planting of shrubs. Planting shall be per \ Planting Schedule. Construct new rockery 3 feet high. Field locate at toe O \ of slope.Taper rockery at ends outside of slide area. \ \ See Project Note #9 for rockery construction details. _ Z. 0 \ Restore 2' by T gravel trench drain. Repair existing 6- Dense sand layer i inch perforated pipe if encountered during excavation. Remove loose fill to expose dense, native sand �I Excavate keyway at toe of slope as directed by Geotechnical Engineer and backfill with quarry spalls FIGURE 2 - PROFILE B-1 i Horizontal Scale 1" = 10' GILES CNGINEERING l 1SSOCIWES, INC. r V EOTECHNICALGEOEf1VIRONMENTAL AND CONSTRUCTION 1 MIATERIALs CONSULTAnts RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Dallas Madison Seattle Milwaukee Los Angeles 9 Washington, D.C. BORING N0. &6OfATION: -- ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SURFACE ELEVATION: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLETION DATE: 10/29/96 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Jennifer Wolfe PROJECT: Beresford Slide PROJECT LOCATION: 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, WA PROJECT NUMBER: 6G-9610009 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Below Surface SNo & Type N qu (tsf) qp (tsf) Qs (tsf) w (%) PID NOTES Medium dense, moist, dark brown, silty fine SAND grading to loose. ------------------------------------------------------- Loose, wet to saturated, brown, fine to medium SAND, trace coarse sand, trace silt. Grades to saturated. Grades to medium dense. 5 Q 10 �4 7 s 12 1-SS 2-SS 3-SS 4-SS Boring terminated at 12.5 feet. WATER OBSERVATION DATA REMARKS 7- WATER ENCOUNTERED DURING DRILLING7.5 ft WATER LEVEL AFTER REMOVAL: 3 ft CAVE DEPTH AFTER REMOVAL: WATER LEVEL AFTER HOURS: CAVE DEPTH AFTER HOURS: 1 . Changes in strata indicated by the lines are approximate boundary between soil types. I he actual transition may be gradual and may vary considerably oetween borings. Location of Test Boring is shown on the Boring Location Plan. RECORD OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Dallas Madison Seattle Milwaukee Los Angeles Washington, D.C. BORING NO. &�OJATION: -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SURFACE ELEVATION: -- - --- ---- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLETION DATE: 10/29/96 FIELD REPRESENTATIVE:------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jennifer Wolfe PROJECT: Beresford Slide PROJECT LOCATION: 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, WA PROJECT NUMBER: 613-9610009 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Feet Below Surface e SamNo. & Type N qu (tsfI qp (tsf) Qs (tsf) w (a/o) PID NOTES Very loose to loose, moist, brown, silty fine SAND, trace gravel (FILL). --------------------------------------------------------- Dense to very dense, moist, brown, silty, fine to medium SAND. trace coarse sand. 5 10 15 20 3 7 32 31 53 58 ss 1-SS 2-SS 3-SS 4-SS 5-SS 6-SS 7-SS Boring terminated at 21.5 feet. WATER OBSERVATION DATA REMARKS -v WATER ENCOUNTERED DURING DRILLING:None WATER LEVEL AFTER REMOVAL: None CAVE DEPTH AFTER REMOVAL: None WATER LEVEL AFTER HOURS: CAVE DEPTH AFTER HOURS: 1 unanges in strata maicatea ny the ones are approximate oounaary oetween sou types. i ne actuai transioon may oe graouai ano may vary consiaeramy oetween borings. Location of Test Boring is shown on the Boring Location Plan. z U S STANDARD SIEVE OPENING N INCHES U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS NYDnO&AETER e 4 9 Y 4% 1 v WJill IN a 1 0 111hp INN ME INN 111111: Bortp No B-1 B-2 0 '0 ►0 100 SO 10 Sieve Test Results ASTM:D-422 REPORT OF SOIL ANALYSIS 1215 Viewland Slide r. . 1 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT � FLYNN 1 RESIDENCE SLOPE FAILURE � Edmonds, Washington 1 PREPARED FOR Mr. Jack Flynn PROJECT NO. 9102-10G MARCH 27, 1991 4EMASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT FLYNN RESIDENCE 1215 VIEWLAND WAY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON March 27, 1991 Project No. 9102-10G I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study for the yard deck and slope regrading project at your residence. The approximate locations of the explorations accomplished for this study are presented on the Site and Exploration Sketch, Figure 1. In the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the project are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be reviewed and modified, or verified, as necessary. ■ 1.1 Purpose and Sco..pe ' The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface soil data to be utilized in the design and development of remedial measures for repair of the slope failure at the above mentioned project site. Our study included a review of available geological literature, hand dug ' exploration holes, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. Engineering studies were also conducted to determine a type of suitable deck foundation, allowable soil bearing pressures, lateral earth pressures, slope stability considerations, and ' drainage considerations. This report summarizes our current field work and offers development recommendations for reconstruction of the failed area based on our present understanding of the project. ' 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Jack Flynn. Our study ' was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated February 5, 1991. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Flynn and his agents, for specific application to this project. Within.the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services ' have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made. It must be understood that no recommendations or engineering design can yield a guarantee of stable slopes. Our observations, findings, and ' opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. , 2. 0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The Flynn residence is situated at 1215 Viewland Way in Edmonds, Washington. The lot was generally level on top around the residence; however, the northern edge of the back yard sloped down toward 196th Avenue at an approximate slope of 1-1/2H:1V (Horizontal: ' Vertical). The total elevation change between the yard area and the toe of the slope was about 50 feet. The eastern portion of the yard was at a level about 9 feet higher than the west, with concrete stairs connecting the two yard areas. A small, concrete -lined fish pond with about 1- ' 1/2 feet of standing water was located near the northwest corner of the yard. Vegetation consisted of a grass yard with various landscaping plants that include small trees and shrubs. An approximately 8 foot high, treated timber (railroad tie), retaining wall was located on the ' slope along the north side of the yard. We understand that the wall was built about a year ago by a landscape contractor. The wall was built to provide a larger, level north yard area. During this past winter, after heavy rains, the slope and wall failed. The wall, the planter area ' behind the wall, and part of the adjacent yard have all been displaced in the downslope direction. The failure resulted in the sprinkler system in the planter area being pulled apart in several locations and the northern end of the fish pond being undermined. ' As directed by the owner, the scope of this project will include remediation of the slide to reduce the risk of future earth movement and the reconstruction of the yard area to provide a space similar to the pre -slide conditions. In general, remediation of the slide will involve ' partial removal of the upper portion of the existing timber wall and the existing fill behind the wall. The remaining soil will be regraded to provide positive surface drainage of the failed area. Reconstruction of the yard will include building a cantilevered concrete/steel composite, ' deck out over the existing failed area. Top soil and landscape plants will be placed over the deck. Improvements to the surface and subsurface drainage of the deck, yard, and slope area will also be incorporated into the project. Structural plans for the deck and yard reconstruction will be designed by Nelson-Bourdages, Inc., structural engineers. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ' Our field study included excavating a series of hand -dug exploration holes around the and an north slope to gain shallow subsurface information about the site. The various yard of sediments as ,well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed are indicated on ' the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The depths indicated on the logs where conditions changed may represent gradational variations between sediment types in the field. Our explorations were approximately located in the field by measuring from known site ' features around the residence. A site sketch was prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. to show the,relative locations of our exploration holes and various yard features. ' The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the 8 hand -dug exploration holes completed for this study. The number, location, and depth of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. Due to restricted equipment access, deep exploration borings or backhoe exploration pits were beyond the scope ' of this study. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions will probably be present due to the alteration of topography by past ' grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may ' be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ' Subsurface conditions across the north side of the property were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site and review of applicable geologic literature. As shown on the field logs, the exploration holes generally encountered fill materials overlying natural deposits of medium dense sands and dense sands. ' The following section presents more detailed subsurface information organized from the upper (youngest) to the lower (oldest) sediment types. 4.1 Stratieranh Fill soils (those not naturally placed) were encountered in all of our exploration holes. The fill ranged in thickness from 1 to 4-1/2 feet in EH-1 and EH-7, respectively. As noted on the ' exploration logs, the fill consisted of loose to medium dense, moist to wet, brown or grey, silty, fine to medium sand with some gravel and occasional organics, and minor amounts of rubble and debris. These materials vary in both quality and depth across the site. The quality of the fill materials is very poor due to the apparent lack of compaction or suitable keying and benching during placement. In addition, the fill is not free -draining material, and is currently oversteepened in some areas of the site. ' Natural soils beneath the fill materials in EH-2, EH-3, EH-5, and EH-6 consisted for the most part of medium dense, damp to moist, brown, fine to medium sands with some gravels and varying silt contents. This unit was about 1 to 2 feet thick in EH-3 and EH-2, respectively, ' and was greater than 3 feet thick and extended below the depth of our exploration holes in EH- 5 and EH-6. Lodgement till was found to exist near the surface in the representative areas around exploration holes EH-1, EH-2 and EH-4. This material was overrun by several thousand feet of ice during the last glacial advance which resulted in a compact soil possessing high strength, low compressibility, and low permeability characteristics. The lodgement till commonly consists of dense, damp, grey, silty, fine to medium sand with some gravel. The lodgement till was found at depths ranging between 1 and 3-1/2 feet in EH-1 and EH-2, respectively. Underlying the sandy gravels in EH-3 at a depth of about 4 feet below the surface, was a dense, moist, grey, fine to medium sand. This material extended beyond the bottom of our 6 foot deep exploration hole. 4.2 Hvdrolo No ground water seepage was encountered in any of our exploration holes at the time of our ' field study. Some minor ground water seepages were noted beneath the fish pond. This ground water appeared to be "perched" atop the relatively impermeable lodgement till which is underlying the fill soils in this area. The level and amount of ground water seepage will vary ' with rain, irrigation and time of the year. 1 1 ' March 27, 1991 Project No. 9102-10G H. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ' 5.0 INTRODUCTION As stated previously, the owner has optioned to partially mitigate the risk of future earth movement in the failed area and to construct an earth -covered, cantilevered deck to replace the yard area lost to the slide. Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, both of these objectives can be met. We emphasize that full mitigation of the risk of future earth movement on this slope is not feasible pe and that some risk of slope failure will always remain. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are offered as a means to ' identify and reduce risks associated with. the north slope. It -should -be understood that our �recommendations are not±rneant to ablize}agamst future earth rnovmenbut will provide vertical foundation support only for the proposed deck, without the proposed deck construction ' increasing the potential for future slope movements. The deck support would be accomplished using a series of drilled piers along the edge of the ' existing scarp to transmit foundation loads into the dense, natural, in -place core sediments of the slope. Support of the rear (south end) of the cantilever would be accomplished using a continuous footing that is keyed into the relatively shallow, dense, natural sediments that underlie the remaining, unfailed yard area. ' Partial mitigation of the potential for future movement of the existing fill would be accomplished by reducing the driving forces on the existing fill and timber wall. This would ' involve partially dismantling the wall and regrading the fill as described in the following sections of this report and the fill regraded as described herein. Measures to control surface and potential subsurface water are also recommended. Development of the project using any of the recommendations presented in this report should proceed only if the owner accepts full ' responsibility for any damage in the event of slope movement. 6.0 SLOPE STABILITY CONSIDERATIONS Based on our visual observations, the uncontrolled fill encountered in our hand -dug exploration .holes and on the failure of the existing wood wall, it is our opinion that the stability of the surface sediments on the north slope is less than that which is generally acceptable by current geologic hazard assessment and geotechnical engineering standards. We strongly recommend that no cutting of the toe of this slope ever be conducted, by you or by others. Removal of the ' sediments at the toe of this slope could cause the uncontrolled fill or -natural slope sediments on the slope to slide. ' The core sediments-- the dense glacial till and advance sands-- are generally considered at this time to be in a stable condition on this slope. Minor sloughing of these sediments may occur at the top of the existing slide scarp over time. By supporting the proposed yard deck and drilled piers into the dense core sediments, the minor sloughing or possible future movement of the ' fill soils on the slope are not expected to have an adverse effect on the proposed structure. 4 7.0 REMEDIATION AND RECONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS There are 3 main areas which will require remediation or reconstruction. These include the fish pond, the upper slope north of the stairs and upper patio, and the main slope area. Our recommendations for each of these areas are as follows. 7.1 Fish Pond The northern two to three feet of the fish pond has been undermined by the recent failure. As of the writing of this report, three alternatives for mitigating the fish pond have been proposed. The first alternative would be to remove the fish pond entirely. The area would then be backfilled and the yard deck could be extended closer to the west property boundary. This method also has the least long-term risk associated with the continuing soil creep on the hillside. The second alternative would be to reduce the size of the fish pond by eliminating the northern undermined end. This could be accomplished by cutting the concrete pond back to where it still has natural bearing soil beneath it. A new retaining wall and footing would then be cast on the bearing soil at this location. Landscape fill could then be regraded around the new end of the pond. With the new pond end founded on dense natural sediments, the risk of damage to the pond from future soil creep on the slope would be small, but some periodic regrading of the landscape fill may be necessary. rThe'third�alternative would be to: -construct a*, retainikng .wa,11 around'the-undermined end of the fish pond and to backfill. the void- with controlled density fill (CDF)�: The retaining wall footing must be keyed a minimum of 2 feet into the dense, natural sediments. Bearing capacity for this wall should be limited to 1000 psf due to the wall's location on the slope. The height of this wall cannot be definitely determined until construction but is anticipated to be between 6 to 8 feet high depending on the depth to suitable bearing sediments in this area. The wall should be designed for equivalent lateral fluid of 35 pcf if it is free to yield at the top. If the top is fixed to the pond, the equivalent lateral pressure should be 45 pcf. A drain pipe must be placed behind the wall at the footing elevation. The drain should consist of rigid, perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by pea gravel or washed drain rock. The back of the wall should be lined with approved drainage boards to prevent the building of hydrostatic pressure. This alternative would have the highest risk of future damage to the pond due to further soil creep on the hillside. We strongly recommend that one of the first two alternatives be selected as the associated risks with these methods are minimal. , We,, .do. not recommend the third alternative and suggest that ,wall sectionn�i'dered�,,Unless the and to he pond due to future soil movement g cept"the risk of damage to both the new _ on the slope. ' 7.2 The Upper Slope The upper slope area had developed several tension cracks near the top of the slope. We understand these cracks have occurred in the past according to Mrs. Flynn. The cracks are a ' surface manifestation of the fill soils as they creep down the slope. No direct stabilization of the upper slope area will be attempted. Instead, indirect methods, i.e. reducing the driving force and controlling ground water, will be used to reduce the potential for future movement. Therefore, we recommend that any of the existing concrete rubble and other debris that could be removed from the slope, without causing any damage to ' the existing slope, removed from this area. An interceptor drain should be constructed at the top of the slope to. collect'surfaceand �ground waier'before.it reaches the slope. The drain should extend at least 6 inches into the underlying dense sediments which are approximately 3- 5 1 1/2 feet deep in this area. The drain should be a minimum of 1 foot wide and contain near the ' base of the trench, a 4 inch diameter, perforated, rigid PVC pipe surrounded by washed drain rock or pea gravel. The pipe should be placed at the bottom of the trench with the perforations oriented to the lower quadrant of the pipe. 011ie -drain should -be constructed to allow gravity ' discharge to the west where it will be tightliried tolfie storm water system along the west side ofthe-house. The trench should be backfilled to the surface with washed drain rock or pea gravel. ' 7.3 Main Yard/SlopeArea Prior to construction of the yard deck, some preparatory work to the displaced area of the north slope should be completed. In order to reduce the driving force which can cause further slope movement, it is desirable to remove as much fill material off of the north slope area as possible (within geometric and economic constraints). Therefore, the upper 3 to 5 feet of the ' existing timber wall should be removed such that an approximate 3 foot high portion of the existing wall is left in place. The existing fill behind the timber wall should be removed and the area regraded to create a 1.5H.1V slope. All fill to be removed from the slope should be completely removed off of the site and not placed elsewhere on the north slope. A cantilevered yard deck is to be constructed along the north side of the existing yard area. The deck, as designed by Nelson-Bourdages Engineers, is understood to consist of wide flange ' steel beams cantilevered out over the slope which support a steel/concrete composite deck. Topsoil, sod and planters will then be placed over the deck. To provide foundation support and a suitable setback of the foundation load from the edge of .' the slope, we recommend supporting the structure on drilled piers must be a minimum of 14 inches in diameter and must extend a minimum of 10 feet into the dense, natural sediments. Properly reinforced piers would be capable of supporting 15 ton/pile vertical loads. ' Anticipated settlement of the piers is less than one inch. The installation of the piers should be inspected by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. to verify that their depths are consistent with the recommendations set forth in this report. ' The allowable bearing capacity for the soil support portion of the cantilevered beam may be considered to be 2000 pounds per square foot (pso. An increase of 1/3 may be used for short term wind or seismic loads. If a keyway is necessary to provide lateral support for the structure, a passive pressure of 350 pounds per cubic foot may be used. The keyway must be poured directly against undisturbed, dense, natural sediments for this value to apply. This passive pressure includes a factor of safety of 3 to minimize the amount of movement required to provide this support. 8.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS ' As previously discussed, the control of water, both surface and subsurface is essential in reducing the potential for further slope movement. All .of the drains recommended in this ' reportshould either be tied into the existing site storm sewer system or tightlined to the bottom ofthenortfiralope. No drainage should be allowed to discharge onto the slope. An_,mtereeptor drain should be constructed behind the deck keyway in order to collect any potential perched ground water flowing laterally across the top of the dense sediments. This drain should be a minimum of 1 foot wide and should extend a minimum of 1/2 foot into the ' 6 I�� 1 dense sediments. A rigid, perforated, PVC pipe should be placed near the bottom of the ' trench with the perforations in the lower quadrant of the pipe. The drain should be surrounded, and the remainder of the trench backfilled, with pea gravel or washed drain rock. , T kyard de&,should be sloped to drain to the north and west.,. Prior to placing topsoil on the deck, a drainage -layer of either washed drain rock covered with filter fabric or approved drainage boards should be placed to cover the deck. A�yardtdrain consisting of a perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by pea gravel or washed drain rock should be placed along. the. north side yaTdd6&, All of the collected water from the newly constructed drain line;* be tightlinefl to �t}e^storm water system located on the west side of the house. Water should not dbe allowed to discharge onto the slope as this may cause erosion and saturation resulting in additional movement of the existing fill soils. The tightline should discharge onto a` ro,,ekmat at the toe of the slope to dissipate the flow energy. ' 9.0 CONSTRUCTION MONITORING We are available to provide geotechnical engineering, the required pier inspections and ' monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of this current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Gotechnical Engineer I' ' Ronald A. Parker, P.G. Principal JSB/ld A 102-1 OG DK3/ 1 /91 Id 7 Bruce L. Blyton, P.E. Senior Engineer s EH-6 1 EH-4 11 J K W m EH-8 gCAp� LEGEND i EH-1 0 Approximate location of hand exploration pit Inter"Otent soli cracks SITE AND EXPLORATION LOCATION SKETCH FLYNN RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON s ■ EH-2 - IRS NORTH 0 20 40 APPROXIMATE SCALE N FEET ABBOCIATED EARTH 04 if M-MSCIENCESs INC 9102-10G February 1991 HAND EXPLORATION HOLE 0 NUMBER E9-1 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Loose, damp, brown, silty, fine to medium sand with trace gravel. (Fill) Dense, damp, prey, fine to medium sand with some silt and (Lodgement Till) ,ravel. 2 12' Note: No seepage. No caving. 4 6 NUMBER E9-2 0 -T--. 4 6 S, interpretation erVineerk4 - --r - "` %Pw ooservatlona at the time end location of this ex WWYels, and judgment They are not necesaariy ►ePresentative of srlOrrime 6modifledd b8 we -111 not geologlc accept resp ww#j"y for the use a interpretation by *there of Information Presented on ttya log SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Flynn Residence 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, Washington 9102-1 o(,. I February 1 og1 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC HAND EXPLORATION HOLE NUMBER Eli-3 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION 0 2- 4. 61 Loose, moist; dark brown, organics. (Fill) silty, fine to medium sand with some Loose, (Fill) wet, grey, silty, gravelly, fine to medium sand. Medium dense, moist to wet, grey/brown, sandy gravel. Dense, moist, grey, fine to medium sand. BOH 0 Tdote: 6' t10 seepage; minor caving, from 2-4'. NUMBER 0 2 4 W. SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION Loose, moist, dark brown to grey with depth, silty, fine to medium sand with trace gravel. (Fill) !Iedin dense to dense with depth, moist (wet in small areas), grey, silty, fine to medirim sand with some gravel. (Disturbed Lodgement Till.) ROIL (a 61 "dote: Tdo seepage in hole; minor seepage at 1' below nearbv pond; no caving. Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the tine and bcatbn of this exploratory hole, modified by geologic interpretation, enghmwi g analysis, and Judgment. They are not necessarfy representative of other times and locations. We will not accept responsWtly for the use or Interpretation by others of YNonnatlon presented on this b% Flynn Residence 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, Washington 0102--10C 1 February 1991 4em-ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC HAND EXPLORATION HOLE NUMBER EH-5 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION 0 2 4 Loose, moist to, wet, brown and grey, silty, fine to medium sand with some gravel. (Fill) Loose to medium dense, moist to wet, fine to medium sand with some silt and trace gravel. BOH 0 51' Note: No seepage. No caving. NUMBER F;H-6 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION 0 2 4 6 Loose -to medium dense, damp to moist, grey, silty, fine to medium sand with some gravel. (Fill) i1edium dense, damp to moist, brown, fine to medium sand with some gravel and trace silt. BOH 0 6' Note: No seepage; no caving. Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, nwdfied by geologic trnerpretatkn% engineering analysis, and Judgment. They are not necessarily reprosentadve of other tines and locations. We will not accept responsblitiy for the use or Interpretation by others of Information presented on It" io% 9102-10G Fehruary 1991 Flynn Residence 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, Washington ASSOCIATED EARTH .jr=m SCIENCES, INC HAND EXPLORATION HOLE NUMBER E11-7 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION 0 2 4 6 Loose to medium dense with depth, damp to moist, brown and grey, silty, fine to mediiim sand with some gravel. Piece of chicken wire at approximately 4'. (Fill) BOH 0 42' Note: No seepae. No caving. Hole was excavated horizontally into hillside. NUMBER EH-8 SEDIMENT DESCRIPTION O 2 4 6 Loose to medium dense, damp to moist, grey, silty, fine to medium sand with some gravel. Hark deist at 3'. (Fill) BOH 0 3' Note: No seepa^e. No caving. Hole was excavated horizontally into hillside. Two old topsoil/sod horizons were noted: one approximately 1' into the hole; the second at approximately 2'' into the hole. Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at V e time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by geologic Interpretation, engirm"wing analysis, and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We will not accept responsiblitly for the use or interpretation by others of Information presented on this log. 9102-10G 1 February 1091 Flynn Residence 1215 Viewland !,day ASSOCIATED Edmonds, Washington EARTH ism SCIENCES, INC CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: j Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation Engineering 890. 19C� May 10, 1991 Larry McNealy Zion Construction Co. 992 Industry Drive tr Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Drainage for deck at 1215 Viewland Way Dear Mr. McNealy: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR s-/13 /`1 STR� n eT F/�F Subsurface and surface drainage for the deck at 1215 Viewland Way must be discharged at an approved location per the geotechnical engineer's recommendation. The deck will be placed on an area which presently drains down the slope to the north. The Community Development Code states "Where possible, surface water discharge facilities shall be released at the same points that handled the runoff before construction, with no significant change in the proportion of water handled at each point." We would prefer to have the deck drainage run down the slope to a point acceptable to the project geotechnical engineer. We will allow discharge to the drainage system in Viewland Way if you can demonstrate that the landowner between you and the stream will not allow you to cross his property, or require unreasonable compensation to discharge on or across his property. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-3202. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer JCW/sdt c: Jack Flynn 1215 Viewland Way Edmonds, WA 98020 ZIONCNST/TXTST530 1�1 Cl 6--- Alberts I— • Incorporated August 11, 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan -,-.> f`w! `. '. CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION ONE PERMIT IZ— NUMBER 9�.� �4 PERMIT APPLICATION-- OWNER NAMElNAME OF'•BUSINESS JOBADDRESS /p�� -/,^ /�f 1 - SUITE/APT ZMAI^LING ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. lID N//0. CI7Y .'ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved Q EXISTING REOUIRED DEDICATION RW Permit Required Q NAME PROPOSED Street Use Permit Raq'd Q Inspection RequlrW Q Nr / Cr-v I � � r, ----•_,- _ SidowelX Required Q C STATE some z'—i�iA.LLJ■ N, CnUINEERING MEMO DATED y 5 o ql METER S12E BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE NO. I: TELEPHONE NUMBER —11 - Ir1CfUde all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED C�(OMMPPL/E_TTEE_ ncvi 1//QrtAR. ... _.. / r E T/ Lam' JEXEMPT NAM / A __ jO nnnl /G REVIEyy y FH(HH\JJJJ\ 4 zZ SETBACKS - FEET HEIGF T LOT COVERAGI Tax Account Parcel No. FRONT 2 SIDE IU, • REAR tr / NEW RESIDENTIAL atE�MARKS n ` WOC F% j f �,-e-��/ L J AODI TER COMMERCIAL PLUMBING MECHANICAL REPAIR APT. BLDG. El r�7 I f `.r SIGN '. DEMOLISH O GRADING CVOS. FENCE I CHECKED BY k TYPE QF CONSTRUCTION ®yY0 CODE w^ HEIGI CARPORT REMODEL O x�-� SWIM / 5 V�.IVC Iey LV( KV GARAGE O WOOD STOVE�{,r�� -T•RETAINING WALL/ INSERT LJ RDGKERY. O POOL '� �'�-�^- � El SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED �'� YES AREA" OUANCY GROCCUP P JJ OCCU LOAD RENEWAL ... MARKS PPE OF USE,B SINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: Xr— PROGRIESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 UMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF ' DWELLING IESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH UNITS PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED mg� VALUATION Gay C �A/,I�L ' I /d_ C e.�` Q (/I//r PLAN CHECK FEE -'• BUILDING PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction On the public domain GRADING/FILL (Curbs, sidewPlks, driveways, marquees, etc,) will require separate permission. Permit Application: 180 Days STATE SURCHARGE Permit Limit: 1 Yea! -Provided Wgrk 18 Started Within 180 Deyb STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold ENO. INSPECTION FEE harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, a employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of = whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this c permit shall not be deemed to o modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x nor limit in any way the City's PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMO I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I UNT DUE D. ) S am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and ATTENTION APPLICATION APPR OVAL state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz• ad thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington relatln to Workmen's Compensa• ti n Insurance. THIS PERMIT AUTHis ONLYO TIHES WORK NOTED not a rmit s gned byThislthelion Building OtficP or his/heir Deputy; SIG and fees are paid, nd receipt is NATUR OWNER AGENT) INSPECTION aC OWIS ad I pace p vided. DATE S/I///GGGNED DEPARTMENT / CITY OF % Fit AL'S N RE DATE EDMONDS \TT S •. ION CALL FOR RELEA BY.- DATE IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. INSPECTION NTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS.9EEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR %%1-3ZO2 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS" BEEN GRANTED. UBC ORIGINAL -File YELLOW - Inspec HAPTER 3: = PINK - Owner GOLD - AcgASc�- FILE## N/A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Slope proptecting deck Proponent Jack Flynn Location of proposal, including street address, if any 1215 Viewland Way, Edmonds, WA 98026 Lead Agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. X There is no comment period for this DNS. _ This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official John Bissell Position/Title Code Enforcement Tech. Phone 771-3202 Address 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds WA 98020 Date April 10 1991 Signature.-.�u��---- _.., X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance. to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m. April 20, 1991 by filing a written appeal citing reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact John Bissell to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part 0). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FLy14n1 ��Srt7�iJC� yilP-p aecK 2. Name of applicant: 2� 1(3f -1 CcN5 1 IRJC.T/LtJ 7l�� 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: qQ.-�- iriaysTtRY OR1vE TUKWILA \N/AJ6198 C SAS-v3(-7) 4. Date checklist prepared: A�-2-�I RaC..r. ,-V,ED APR 2 - "I" pamil CUM ► I : 1-/1RieY MC �Jt5c- LY 5. Agency requesting checklist: EDMo.J DS 6Q1A-DJ�G jJprp j . 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): AS SOc79,4 A S 7z5 STi38lLi��., Sept: 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. GeO TN O ?CPo� 9/a2 -- t-O 3=,27-1, 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. poeS P4a /}PPLY 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You'do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) IWS ALr.aT10,,l or` 14 CgnlT /ZC- Vc�2C L) C04C:kG Tk/S-ie� DeCK- . (J,e A I t-3A G (�- R-N (D Y4 ie p /2u�cv S ► feuC -"Oj-) fi e?E a o >% n SSG c r a- Te o -b+re i (-I SC, o-)CE5 v ! A r' r 1 -, ^ t_4 el r rN-% - I., -).q -.r- AA .,-,-'I ' -r ,n- i 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,. and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map., and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. �:L15 V 1 ew L ,AJJo "VAY c0j io,4OS 1v1,fSt41,-J6roA1 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, tee opes mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? � -7nz c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sc: C- ?sK,E y c5/-' A- C-.S Ae po,er 44 91 U2- JC4 3- z7-ct ( 41. 1 ) S-rX A T C,,e,4 P 11 Y d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 566- PAGcF Cr C7,1) -rdt uPp6-k ScopE7 o% -0 gloz-,roy 3-2.'2--1/ e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. w r�s l��p �ocK �-►-� 5�+0 Lo&wl f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. 51.j�3C« -r14 SLoj'b= 14A,,c- A-e-A--AoOl t=o4lC&D ERoS�c�� tS L cJj��i r�r�b W��C ca►.l vU� vtil;i� Tj4 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Re soD f r•rc, A,4 C> or 1 t)y oR crl4ei?- Ceei" Fp tr1U �its DI tg-r T-S ( 15Y 0 W, QuR) 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, -industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. pUSi DQZiVJA C0NS7-2UCrip,J OJ-ILY b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. N(D c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 0o C 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. SMA%-L C_eC 7K �igK�1-LGL/�C l�(p IT FL -<)Ws iN-ro PoCnr I Sam N� ? 3Ct.c c%til�s 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 14(3 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. O"cs ),J(.!,-r ► 12p(-Y 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Poe 5 I-Jv7 A PP- y FO2 Ir v I-rgORA'34L-S B v T )► LL 0 e t✓ o 1 b DW e-tz�► \A) &A-TLSK A P_o v �.1,0 D csC.. r 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. f� C b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. V 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to:be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Oo�$ k-�10T c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. EX /Sr JOC? ,zc�? JDRA-jtjS 7b N&Mw �Y G4 i ct4 3f9s., 3 . P�opoS OcsG,C P2 ► �'e d � l�'rsR �, iL3 CJ � , Pt= A-N D B H T L- � •JCS WKo- W w;&;2 To -rN-c-S -jc�e- oi= i i4c-- S cope 2) ""Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: s 0-6- Pl+{2 er (c CSii O Pe -A ,P'466 P�r--Pc-,er-0- gjoz- ioc, 3 -�/ 4. Plants a. Check or circle .types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs amass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water -plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _,,-other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? C,eRSS 5 tFievi35..� ��c. �3c� IZcr F-t c� J (��rJ T1-l�i.J 12�p�-G�7� c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. O O Jjbrj' K t'Io "3 r— A-t-Y d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: soe-tir K'b �r ► t)y ok ,�� PC.A-r--r—) TCD C ecep AL-OAA Sto p6-�;- i3` c-o uJ 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: / birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: ........ wJ.............. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: .............. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, othev:�. i.......... b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Q Cb po O i— r piv'-J 6 i= 0-TJ y c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. IDC> >J b i IC d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: riOp &_ 0 f A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. L L G?2 i C , .50 VJ 5 d' (Fi;> o 1 P b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. )JO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. S Pjc�k� t*pp 11-r 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: �y �� C CC) i c%C b. Noise P' SCGT l�I o) I 0'1--10(10t4Cc N 27, 19 q i 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N O /-3 (- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. e-(PUIpol7' Flzo/-4 14-0 U 2 S % J 3v �¢- M v c i /ZD A3 7-0 4; 3v prvi 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Rc' l ocs,-3c;C 'S ot-> s/ve-S ve4C01—yr b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. iv Q c. Describe any structures on the site. Li►2C-7c- -r w o STo 2Y 4c, -4 L:!5, d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N O e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? PCs I s7e--tiLess h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. t iCb i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? pi or 4 C TWO PL?O PLc- L-1 aee AIJ 6[,opjS't-) j.App''roximately how many people would the completed project displace? eg- k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: GLIC. .4_A PPc, y 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: %90 cis "CIT # PPL-y 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. PC)ee, /-BUT 4P Pc-y b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. OoG-fS {LPL,/ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: tx��s o T- 0.0 PL-y 10'._ Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? t-3ot�3 t� c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: poc- S SOT riPP('y 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 12UvvS tJoT d-Pf'cy b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NC.; C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NbrJ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: V9Q s-S N1 ZT I+tVe4_Y 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? P o P e b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: vi © 1-J t�7 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to tfte site? If so, generally describe. nld rc. N Y b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. VIct-3 L/'l- NO viAi / b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 00 (0 3 C-O G 1,C3 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). - Nc) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. P6,e-s NG -T. jqp p(- y g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electrici natural gas, er a use serviced ephon anttary sew , septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Fat Poi J(s2 5�4�5 _ C-X C. N v r4-T c , J E, us cam" o Fo 24' 7-R u CK-s C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to4make* of my knowledge. I understand that the lead y 's rely; , on them odecision. Signature•.... ................... Date Su fitted: D. Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Rezones, Code Changes, Annexations, etc.) -- Do not use this sheet for project actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? NIA Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NIA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? N /,Ar Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: NI% A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N /A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? 1\1 /A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: NA 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with ex'is/ting plans? IY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 1 ` /A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? _W /A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: K/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N or1 E ENVCHK3/PFORMS Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 1215 Viewland Way 2. Property Tax Account Number: Harborview Estates,Vol.45, pg. 72-73,Lot3 72- 000- 003 -Do o[, 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 12,000 sq . f t . 4. Is this site currently developed? y_yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? Single family residence 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. p�R°l IT ra��,��. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. - = Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). x . Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water Garden Pond; Approx. Depth: 18 in. 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water.No ; Approx. Depth: What seasons) of the year?, 8. Site is in the floodway No floodpWn No of a water course. 9. Site contains a- creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? No Flows are seasonal? NA (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested Partially ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed ; urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) _ X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No For City Staff Use Only 1 4 t: 1. Site is Zoned? i,,S — t 2 2. SCS mapped soil typos)? 3 (l2,'w A rr wl i 15 - Z 5 p s i. 3. Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? 4:-, ,Critical Areas inventoryor C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? *c - si pet+rk eras;,,,,, 5.. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? NO - No},w,n ,•v,.eaust:k wu, 6. Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map? % - 5t., Sf DETERMINATION '-:'STUDY REQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVER WAIVER Reviewed by:_6� tanner Date rtCVouo.M City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical Area Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Mall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcei(s). In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this. Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Name Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Applicant Representative: John E. Zipper, P.E. Giles Engineering Assoc., Inc. Name 19019 36th Ave. W., Suite G Street Address Lynnwood, WA 98036 771-5775 City, State, ZIP Phone t~ . Nov, 22, 1996 Signature Date (/Signature Date City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: John Zipper, Giles Determination #: CA-96-236 Engineering Associates, Inc. Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 1215 Viewland Way Property Tax Acct #: 7295 000 003 00 06 Project Description: Non -Project Specific Determination: Study Required: During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site appears to contain and/or is adjacent to a Steep Slope Hazard Area pursuant to Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). To determine if a Steep Slope Hazard Area does exist, a topographic survey prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor delineating Steep Slope Hazard Areas must be completed. Any slope over 40 % with more than 20 feet of rise will be classified as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. A 50 foot buffer is required from both the top and toe of the slope. A 15 foot building setback is required from the 50 foot buffer. For development of any kind which is proposed within the critical area, 50 foot buffer or 15 foot buffer setback, it must be shown that the development will not adversely impact the Critical Area or its buffer, by doing one or possibly both of the following depending on the outcome of the study: For development proposals which will occur within the 50 foot buffer, but no closer than 10 feet from the top or toe of the slope, the 50 foot buffer requirement may be reduced to 10 feet if a study is completed by a licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer which clearly demonstrates that the proposed buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any private party. All Critical Area Studies must be completed by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer (as defined in ECDC 20.15B.020.Y) or under a three party contract where the City hires the professional required, and the applicant pays for the study (pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B.140). 2. If development. must occur within the critical area, buffer, and/or buffer setback, and is not identified as an exception per ECDC Chapter 20.15B, a Reasonable Use Exception and Variance must be obtained pursuant to ECDC 20.15B.170A and 20.15B.040C. All proposed development of the subject lot must meet the requirements of Chapter 19.05 (Building Permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. If the property owner wishes'to apply for a specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may -submit their proposal to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical Areas or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. M.E. Meg Gruwell December 3 1996 Name k4nature Date 2 City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: John Zipper, Giles Determination #: CA-96-236 Engineering Associates, Inc. Project Name: Stabilizing Landslide Area I Permit Number: Plan Check 96-252 Site Location: 1215 Viewland Way Property Tax Acct #: 7295 000 003 00 06 Project Description: Stabilize a slope which had a landslide in October 1996, remove a block of the slope which could slide further, and prevent a deck from being destabilized Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply):, X _ There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; X The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; X The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; X The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. The slide repair work shall be done in accordance with the recommendations of the November 26, 1996 Geotech Report by Giles Engineering Associates, Inc., and is being done as an emergency repair of a landslide area. 2. The work shall be done in compliance with the City of Edmonds approved plans and code requirements. 3. Rockeries three feet or higher shall maintain setbacks. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.040 (A)(1) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Meg Gruwell 12/3/96 Name Signature Date t< dJ n 4, YF + • „• ADUSE PERMIT ' A"Y T ` mw�aavd v CITY OF EDMONDS ZDrvE S_ NUM13Ea CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION aog SUITEiAPTa ADDRESS��V� L/7�i� •r H`„ ; '^�.SO +y • �� '� a Fq OWNER NAMEiNAME OF BUSINESS 1 LEGAL DESCHIPT:ON CHECK SUBDIVISION NO L:D NO. MAILING ADDRESS- _ g JJ 3 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL. STREET MAP. TESCP Apprdred O O RW Permit Roqulrsd 4 D CITY ZIP NENUMBER ELISTING REOUTAEO DEDICATION n e `I'O ,•� Slroet Uso Parmlt Req d O� �• teape°aonRoc.n:d0 U PROPOSED __ NAMEDAG $IddwdlkRdpVlfed .O'. W —c f REMARK �' `-% "T r•�-1 - � •.. a u�I«'��f � � & °-S4,a` �« F ADDRESS , I f1 I r `� 1- w !�i Y �'•c` B B �;. 'R.° �5�.rJ - m 6 ZIp TELEPHONE NUMBER i •. i -r,-`•;�"a°;;Q°q� .fit CITY � _ (__ - , ! Q'�`4.�d �^��r"r' - p a•w '° NAME R WEW Y tir±..« .T�.:: •;Y vTijYtw8r. 7' ENGINEERING MEMO DATED ADDRESS ?.0 ( O ,�� 1 . r METER SIZE„ BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE NO.OF fIXT:JNES- ,: y4:'' -;'4f @, �•' 4�F, ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER CITY (j < /I„Fyk ^.i' +• 6 P of b - p { ♦•L O REMARKS i '? 3 i. Sr'� '� R. grgoFn, •°-" I i! or O STATE LICENSE NUMBER • - � - ,R !SIGN AREA•,' SEPA REVIEWj�_� - B NO ,% O ALLOWED ;PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT Legal Description of Property inc ude all ,easements r /J i, EICf ^- S E. a4 VARIANCE OR CU ,•�.ANN G REVIEW BYDATE . SETBACI:S — FEET .r ', ,HEIGHT LOTi COVE A E { * x w- d@ t ^i/ r t WI FRONT.•.n,. Tax Account Parcel No. EM ti •. e � �E v U NEW RESIDENTIAL =1 PLUMgIN6 - •� 1 "fg4KN r+- �jcyB� °?'' e, AD01 LTER O COMMERCIAL O MECHANICAL _ APT. BLCG. L� nEPArn r - I yc,GHT 1 • 1 >>a t n'nT^•-Tn 7+ CHECKED BY,% - TYYE, r,COharn O(� GRADING .; ii. FENCE:" i l+ DEMOLISH r LJ CYDS. L�Jj I � ,, 1—n- ^-r. `L ` � ' T. CARPORT n "WIM SPECIAL. INSPECTOR•, AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT 1� REMODEL GARAGE LJ POOL - - REQUIRED : - 5• GROUPi LOAD y Y+bo ❑ vEs t' ^ J 5 d` ElWOOD STOVEI RETAININGVJAIV- " O RENEWAL EMA KS INSERT ROCKERY _ , PR OORESS:INSPECYIO@dS PEAVBC 305 a O (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: - - ' a �.Y�.— ''� . _1A _ v, -''i• A• ..+ I-'+ia,'�•+: a • 6c°B y. 7 Y NUMBER Of• STORIES DWELSEA LINOF _ E 302L:T � m urlrcs ' IF o DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (AT? ACHAL07 PLAN) - �• - '� d rsG ' / FINAL, NSPECTIOIN REQUIRED m ''VALUATION FEE _ kc • /y 1 /��dl' 'PLAN CHECK ' I� ECK C fAI/✓1/✓h VV`/4•� BUILDING' .. ! OD'• FN� i� � �q' 9 y�� 3°� + - PLUMBING �Y.4. �1• `�' - L bA g` Plan Chuck No. MECHANICAL h y • !!'� This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. ORADINGIFILL. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewplks,- drivew•ays, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE r Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work to Started Within 180 Days T � f L ` t0 "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and END. INSPECTION FEE ,Qj successors in interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, a employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages o1 zwhatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirnment of any city ordinance = nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this applloatlon; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given Is correct; and that I am the owner, or the dulyg' at agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS r•ERMIT This application Is note rmlt until' '; at eto laws regulating construction; and In doing the Work authoriz• AUTHORIZES @d thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building OHic t or his/her , A; ry. �F,t • �sa4 ° WORK NOTED Deputy; and (ee9 are paid, nd receipt b A ,};;. Y e `6o'•xn 7 Code 0f the State of Washington relRtln to Workmen's Compensa• a owl ed pace p vided: it n IneUTADC@. INSPECTION o SIGNATU .OWNER AGENTI DALE SI NED DEPARTMENT `t F' IAL' RE DATEI u CITY OF EDMONDS + M w S a� a "c CALL FOR .LE o D ATE A, ATT ION'.;z T� t.N47ECTION S��•. IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE f/71_3202 UNTIL A FINAL ;N;,PECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLO =Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD Assessors e 9 ... -. �T {�!.••ryto �:,.r Y s'+: tl£,ri LrP °°K��ar�' .i11^,.-1 r (�; ��•yy�•.-ye-srx;!.ts�+.v^n--ram w R:.it 4F..i��s-. . ' ._•. ' I ilgn :; /�/ 4,0 ,relevGtion t elevoti0n ;15 j NarG: agoswA ti11TNrV N / ° � - • I ,_., GKYAiIONS Vdl NCN, S, 14 C. B. S AS t1.6 osco , •�',i�; , �', �'.1't . 1 i.0.:S __r-� -- ,NC 7 of PYtNT.4 MBYRAMM tual PS :^ 'S. I •}1161�� SrA •v � Iv�4i`k ' }h.. __��' 2Z I 1 � � —= tl.-.a_—� - ,IS - 1.. I� [�. • . Fix ^'� �^ �' t ,•� , II ' t� �.. z j ""i�� r1 `� �i. l; 1 - I Aso' -I ,� '• t ? .G' i1��:•. frj n5 ,:i y S !1 •� z..; q° q(y{pirl ExlSnN cw I .�`, rP . • l STaT'1✓s R �I o I �r�j m • •�G. I •t 14 w � 1 I� 1 Mtl • �r � V•9� I � oM6Yf. t�r.9�1: ca�ss. »-O b Al. eq:<' --==' CITY OF ®DM;JAD PERM USE ONE - 3 NUMBER Qiii��l8 Aid ��JJJ�� CONSTRUCTION PERMATION b.oZ ,Oa NAME (OR9 NAME OF,18USINESSIADDRELEG L,O/ESCRIP710N CHECK SU�WOMAILING ADDRESS/3CITYER PUBLIC RIGHT O WAVPER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. '�L� EXISTING _ _ REQUIRED DEDICATIONPROPOSEDNAME RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REOUIRED' .` STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED C'ADDRESSSEE EN EERINGCITY BERI 6 __ REiA S.1 )DRESS C�v //N'gGv�/✓6/�✓Pf2W6 �1A✓CLPZ�'.✓ / O I S'- C , METER I/ BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS TELEPHONE tUI.iCER f f Z J NYm 7741-,y sv REMARP FATE LICENSE NUMBER V Lt'� V� / C T7 /'� SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB N P13 ALLOWED PROPOC:D COMPLETE EXEMPT egaINDescription of Property • include all easements u1 « SHORELI M below or attach four copies) VARIANCE OR Cu PUNNING REVIEW 9Y DA LOT FRON;Z r f SIDE � � f AR r _ I TCOVERAGE REMARKS L •(�S NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ��Q,^�"j� •Zt� 4 (R`�� ln—J ADDIALTER LJ REPAIR r� COMMERCIAL RETAINING WALL EXCAVATE LJ MECHANICAL SIGN FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION L-� � CODi I S MEI'tc ' DEMOLISH OR FILL I—x—FT) - 4-� ' OREMODEL COMPLIANCESINSP. wim SPOOL SPECIAL I�ACDNSPECTOR AREA REO GROUPANC.� �L LOCCDUPANT ❑WOOD STOVE/ ❑ INSEPT APT. BLDG ❑ RENEWAL ES C NO R MARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 5I • . NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER O ^ DWELLING UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PL( TNsf�crno.✓ lab VA.UATION FEE 1=_ _ E ICAL 3 Y IFILL_ -This Permit covers work to be done,on private property ONLY. Any construction on.the public domain (curbs, sidewrl! s,driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.URCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days CODEPermit Limit: 1 Year• Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds,. Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of [-INSPECTION whateYer nature, arising directly or indirarfly from the issuanceECK this permit. Issuance of this permit snail not be deemed tomodify, DEPOSITof waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance x nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance AMOUNT DUE71 provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that theTTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the dulyauthorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city andHIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz•AUTHORIZES sl ned by the Buildin Official or his ed thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the LaborONLY THE EO DOputy; and fees are pad, and receipt Is Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• acknowledged In space provided. tl n Insurance. SIG RE TOWN RI GENT !LATE SIGNED_ DEPARTMENT CITY OF OP _ N E DATE GG �. _y—O� EDMONDS 771 32 LEASED BY: D TE 51 Pk ATTENTION zs IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Insp ctoLj A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS 'BEEN GRANTED. UBC y� 16 PINK —Owner GOLD — Assesor CHAPTER 3. f' 102-87 tiL • 44 V �'. .�� i'c`'�;��.ar� cc:.--;�-,^'.:-;•C� n'�_i' � _ 7` ;'� � - �,..M1 r r � L'rv~�'�A?k?�;s� 1��i¢e.-l..`4 y'�j'�'"J� "!i.41 V' �b ♦ ,A,(" ?Y'r�7S�r��;• r ,;;.' '� .rC �5 i`�s- a Y�.s� .�+ - ,t.�..a - 2- , r - r ' r{�'s r oyi T,.aji�.;y'h^f' i �1 .. •id t �'�i''S&l. L 'ML'l.'r�!'� .r. J` ry � ...�• l�) ,�,� j.� s� :_� (�,}� •rd ' ' a'�r"��;µ` . �'��'�' : � T �� „-' ,V '�rntfv�� as.. "�_:�.• r •,sa '� f s .1.-��3�c'�4%v� . �%� b' `• Date Sent to Engineering �O y f � F i ENGINEERING APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY i MEMO TO: Permit Coordinator }' Building Division ` ` FROM: Dan Smith Engineering Inspector f ` DATE: SUBJECT ADDRESS: SUBJECT NAME: ISr Cf/flNb PERMIT# I. a PERMIT APPROVED FOR FINAL i II. %�/ PERMIT NOT APPROVED FOR FINAL i r i Requirements: BUILDING MAR 3 Q 108g 2. 3. • 70 Slc �� y 9Me r Please make the required corrections and recall the City Engineering Department for re -inspection. City Inspector: Dan Smith, 771-3202. 7 Ila a;i;: G . , •1-' .It: 'li\ !L84,Il,F': iya�� ..fy?r�:ry lk i}} •fit :i'". ,•I C^�rt t fit 'Pus v•. RECO,.o OF INSPECTIONS Date PassedOLINDATION ' ? , House S • '• �E -<si, FI IAL'APPROVAI. GIVEN BY: 11 Pprch,,>q piers - -- •zqn , �.I r Wti.ils I Date r R-tai•,ir1p walls •+ Building ca7rOrt -- > Firc i3cpt 'I 'tgtMG Planning (AJB) I Undnr''Dund _z;9r Engineering I Rough•in-� '-L� — ^:�` Water sr. -vice ;z HEATING SYSTEM FRAMING WALLBOARD q � I�7/YA�i .�'✓S�CT/4ti -1NAL .. - '. .. �/. �. Srz rU: CITY OF EDMONDS ASSET INFORMATION SHEET L�J NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSE © -- DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION C� DEP . NO. * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST * PROJECT NUMBER 0—xy1 D.-3�2 PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 0 1 dk COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. `,oeQ -O/�` -`�`• C!O, �� ESTIMATED LIFE INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY DEPRECIATE VERIFIED BY MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT PROCESSED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT BATCH NO. G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE b P INITIAL DEPARTMENT FILE CITY 'of EDMONDS SIDE SEWER P'ER01T. , For Inspection Call 771-3202 PERMIT NO. Address of Construction:: ,Property Legal.Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Builder: Contractor, & License No: D 4Ui-r 13 ` Single Family Residence EDMONDS TREATMENT PLANT_ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No d-�- Yes (If Yes,..Right-of-Way Construction Permit required. Call ,One - Cal l-Center.(1.-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No.. Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify that I have read and shall comply: Date with the items listed on the back. Permit Fee: ;Issued .By: Trunk Charge: j Date Issued: Assessment Fee:.. Receipt No.: £&&05 Partial Inspection; Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: _(3-8? Date Initial °�° Rejected: Reason Date .Initial •n ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy - File Green Copy -`Inspector, Buff Copy - Applicant r " The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO_ .................... ________________________ NEW CONSTRUCTION [✓� REPAIRS ❑ LID NO- -------------- ---- -ASMT. NO- .................. OWNER ----------------•-------•----------•-------••---••-----•------.-.----•------------_----•-------- CONTRACTOR --- . ....'� y/ -•---------------------------- •----•-------------------- PERMIT NO. Q7_...5-7- JOB ADDRESS J-1� S------- " l_ti-W lL V31 Vj--J--------- ��---- r A\N C6 Cb os o l m�: !RR. A-D� — A' f s' b V.J.G coo W fie. L-.fee � . a3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO_ ______________________________________ BLOCK NO. ____________-______-_-..___________- �t�-6o rt_-------L- �_ � w------ �� E S------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAMEOF ADDITION----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p i 4 I ��, � t l� PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) VL fW EDMONDS TREATMENT PLANT Approved: DATE/,----`3--- --�C.............. By ----•------•-•-.......... ....... CITY OF EDM(5NDS CQNSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS)A Cc w MAILING ADDRESS // o `,> .31 {� /S/2) CITY , TELEPHONE NUMBER 71-/- C 1y- NAME w ADDRESS U , Cr CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER' 0. it ADDRESS n CITE, j TELEPHONE NUMBER t� 77y—vi 5v STATE LICENSE NUMBER DA VIF .' i3 i 6 13 S- Legal Description of Property - include all easements (show below or attach four copies) USE WPERMIT ZONE '��% NUMBER JOB I ^ ADDRESS (J/. 1 V I.EGJkL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. r 3 --� P —� PUBLIC RIGHT O WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION — PROPOSE _ RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REOUIRED,e,,, STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED I SEE ENGI EERING MEMO PA'T€D -/4'- GSl METER E II (BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE W V REMARKS j PK ✓ ��1� SIGN AREA I ENV. REVIEW ALLOWED i PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT WI IL 1 _ S PICA' i VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY YARDS i f �� HH IGHT FRONT2_ r SIDE � F R REMARKS V Lon NO. Z iL w Z Z w RE UNITS � w a 3 ADB NO. ELINE DAT 7� LOT COVERAGE Z � Z J a NEW ©!RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADD/ALTER EI COMMERCIAL � MECHANICAL REPAIR RETAINING WALL El SIGN XC V T CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE Li DEMOLISH Li OR FILL E (ENCE X_FT) JZW ICI j 2 REMODEL PRE -MOVE INSP.1 COMPLIANCE INSP. ❑ SWIM POOL IV SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED AREA OCCUPANC GROUP �- � OCCUPANT LOAD WOOD STOVE/ n YES :I NO INSERT APT. BLDG RENEWAL REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING / UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) _ 1"�ilnlly yfslaeme,�,_ 1 PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING 'L PEZ W6 W,09- F_i AMW CooE PLUMBING MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curls, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year • Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days ENERGY CODE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, 5 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of < whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance = of this permit. Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT omodify,. waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance = nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED tion Insurance. . INSPECTION SIGNA'rU11 (OWN R GENT ' i �f DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT � y_ OF EDIMONDS VALUATION FEE .- I (A). 0D APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE O Z 0 J_ D M ATTENTION 771-3202 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. 102.87 RELEASED BY: DATE ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor , r � MEMO TO: Building Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: /,Z/S After review of the subject building pe mit application, we have the following comments: 1) Connection to City water system required. 2) Connection to City sanitary sewer- system required. 3) Right-of-way permit required for any work on City property. 4) Driveway slope not to exceed 14A. S) Back water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 6) water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7) Builder/owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties in any way. 8) Construction hours from 1:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, or, weekends and holidays. 02 11 No burning of construction refuse withn-r-apprn,zal . r /� � �/-b.y—F_ire Dept. iOS/On C� eVllPij-1 mir S-1 — /uo _Se��,Ll-r _ MM7,-. PROTECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROTECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: APPLICATION RDCEIPT DATE: ' • '. Reviewed by:,.(initial/date) C 1TS '. ;` . PLANNING WTR/SWR I STREET ENC3iRDIG , FIRE BUILDING SINGLE FAMILY/MULTIPLE/CODR4ERCIAL - (Circle One).., SETBACKS CHECKED - Planning %////////'// // / //////// VARIANCE/SETMCR ADJ. MAR c '1 /, / I / ///// /[IT1/1/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 2 PUBLIC WORKS, ///,///// E ADB REQUIRD nTIS CHECKED ////// ///////// //////// ////////// / /7 777177 7 // 7 7 /// OTHER ZONING REQUIREMENIrS - ////// ///////// ////////,J///////// 4 EMJVIRON?,0CAL FEATURES 71f &Xp Z5 ACCESS SLOPE. & VEHICLE ACCESS '` �li . ///////// ///////// //////// ,.;i: 6 111117 /_77711111111 DRAINAGE PLAN (On Site ////// ///////// ///////// //////// ;,'l 7 STREETFILE ////// ///////// ///////// ////%/// `''' 8 / / / /7TTFI,-17T- I,F)GAL DESCRIPTION VERIFICATION ////// /////////.///////// //////// ';,• 9 777777 / / // -7777 QUIT CIAIM/DEDICATIONS 10 FAM4MP - PUBLIC/PRIVATE CALCULATE SM.-WER CONNECTION IF NO LIDS ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 12 PLAT/SUBDMSIOP7 REQUIREMENTS 13 777TITIT q/ 3� RIG]IT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT RELY) III/ OC1' 14 // ///// / 17T777171 // •..; BOND REQD FOR PUBLIC IMPROVE74mrs ////// ///////// /////.//// //////// '"' 15 SOILS CONDITIONS & GROUND WATER FIEiD C1fECXLD //// / 16 7/7777 ITITill STREET PAVING REQUIRED ////// ///////// ///////// 17 CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED ////// ///////// ///////// ////////// 18 / SIDEWALK REQUIRED , .' ////// ///////// ///////// ✓ : � .r;;;.; 19 ///// 177IF1771 CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY REQD ////// ///////// ///////// ;' ////////// 20 IT171117777TITIT7T 77777777U STREET NAME SIGN READ ///////// ///////// ////////// 21 Ofn[ER SIGNING READ ////// ///////// ///////// ,''" ////////// 22 SIDE SEVER AVAILABILITY ////// ///////// ///////p/// //////// 23 EXISTING WATER MAIN SIZE ////// ///////// !/ //////// ////////// 24 IIIITIIT17 WATER METER SIZE ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 25 777T17 TRT177T 77T77I7777 SERVICE LINE SIZE ////// ///////// J //////// ////////// 26 HYDRANT REQUIRED ///////// 777777777 ///////// //////// ////////// 27 — /77TT1717 HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING ////// ///////// //////// I///////// 28 CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION RF.CD ////// ///////// //////// ////////// 29 / // � Dr'� WATER METER CHARGE RDQD //////'///////// //////// ////////// 30 FIRE LINE CHARGE READ - SPRI419.F.I2 ///////// //////// ////////// 31 STREET CUT ////// ///////// L///////// 32 OPEN DITCH EXISTING ////// ///////// ///////// 33 / // / //// .RE4D ////// ///////// ///////// 34 / / / /// CULVERT REX,)D ////// ///////// ///////// 35 / // /// //// — SIZE ////// ///////// ///////// 36 ///D CATCH BASIN REA _ 37 T17TIT-IT177-1177 INDICATED ON SITE PLAN ////// ///////// ///////// .38 SHOULDER DRAINAGE MAINTAIN SHALE OPEN RUNOFF ////// ///////// ///////// 39 — // 40 REVIEWED BY: PLANNING MGR. ' .;'; ENGINEERING MGR. PUBI XC WORKS . MGR. .L, L• ARc M vs� 4 — SoOTH C,15. MT L Ot iot 3'-►161 , O 7iy►)r�►t4 TA T OFN�O ►Lr S•FfJV(•:NT ED.-STFLANNING M64tT �. • :�-� i _ �(.,: . GYM tE' FLIZ: I� rN s . i 1 - .. - �- NpK`�}{ .p 11 �) R I `�� . - -- --- . � �{� _1-}T'. • �1.•- 3? .' Y �1 tFAI 11� - L.—�-. �� I h`w�.' �ti :•J,:•j i•. j,P • . R IC ' l i 30. IL ;6. _ 14 � �' Sod o' ~' SIP. WAi o bb 7 uG �.de •• T(E NEw ELaV ioZ44 :� U pTO r W Ir 16 •F�yy�: 4 �� .; >, (� � �� J ley// x . �'t f l 4{ Y �� 1(7 y, .- 1 ' M1 t+• ` � A ) •f /' / / �1 I.I ...1 +�-� �T t u -ti �'• „y � J+ Lr..-� ii - � � _ , - � %.. .. ff7JJJ {f//�'..•• ' 1 C..�.. s� f n : ti. i � `a•r � C �'..a : .i i � 4 _ '� -{; � ,.� r �•' .,y.�' i 'ham I ' r , , "'71C i �. `��,� 4•l�; '�`b ;x�.t,r,+. f { ,}.f �.�,,''�Ih t�� 9 j`1 _��, c -•�`' ` ^•t. u-` • �� - 4� + R •`i. '"t.'��l y- ` i : ' .. ;�C/'yyy�• }- � :I� .+ ear • � t (.� . R r F . ! f �� +t 1r .�.1•»Ja. _�ST�h�S: y�:�»+ -.♦4;y t`S �� .�;� •f. � 7 t,,.�C`:J,.i?v�.r �'. •. -�•1 .. 'S',. '. .. :.�: ••1 .y,.`, 4s :.�. • /••r `�•.. '1 'A'T'T`ACHMEhIT 41:�9 ' 1986 Washington State Energy Code = WAC 51-i2 Effective Date - April 1, 1986 These Prescriptive Requirements are applicable only to low-rise residential buildings which are designed under the prescriptive (Chapter 6) approach to the 1986 Washington State Energy Code and are located in Zone 1. (<6000 Degree Days) A. CEILING & ROOF SECTIONS 1. Provide a minimum added insulation level of R-30 at all roof/ceiling areas for an overall U-value of .035. 2. Provide a minimum added insulation level of R-38 (U-.026) at all roof/ceiling areas in buildings utilizing electric resistance heat where framed with other than single joist or rafter construction. P. EXTERIOR WALLS 1. Provide a minimum added insulation level of R-19 at all exterior walls for an overall U-value of .05. 2 X 4 walls filled with R-13 insulation and covered with an R-5 continuous sheathing or 2 x 4 walls filled with R-11 insulation and covered with an R-5.4 continuous sheathing shall be considered to meet the installed insulation level requirements. 2. Basement walls, when finished, need to be insulated to the same added insulation level as required for above grade walls. C. FLOOR SECTIONS Provide a minimum added insulation level of R-19 at all floors over unheated spaces for an overall U-value of .055. Trade-off calculations are required if crawlspace vents are installed in rim -joists within the space required to be insulated. D. SLAB PERIMETER 1. Slab perimeter edges within 12" of grade in heated spaces are required to be insulated to provide a_thermal break between the slab and the foundation wall cry for rwinopours, between the slab edge and the exterior. The insulation shall extend downward from the top of the slab for a minimum distance of 24 inches or downward to the bottom of the slab and then horizontally beneath the slab for a minimum total distance of 24 inches. 2. For perimeter insulation, only water resistant material, such as extruded polystyrene, may be used. All plastic foam products - must be protected against damage and covered or coated to prevent exposure to daylight. , 3. Insulation levels for slabs is a minimum of R-8. E. GLAZING & SKYLIGHTS 1. The type of glass installed is determined by the type of heating system to be installed, as shown in the chart below. All Class 60 and Class 75 windows are required to be tested and labeled. Type of Heating System Type of Glazing Required Electric Resistance Class 60 Gas with AFUE >.65 and <.74 Class 75 or Class 60 Heat pump with COP > 2.5 and < 2.7 Class 75 or Class 60 Gas with AFUE >.74 I I Class 90 or any double glass Heat pump.with COP > 2.7 Class 90 or any double glass 2. Maximum glass area is not to exceed 21% of the gross floor area. 3. All skylights shall bedouble glazed. The area of all Class 90 and untested skylights shall be multiplied times two (X2) and added to the total glass area in 'percentage of glassf calculations. The actual area of Class 60 and Class 75 skylights may be used and shall be added to wall glazing areas in 'percentage of glass' calculations. P y ( F. INFILTRATION CONTROL 1. Exterior Joints around windows and door frames, openings between walls and foundations, between walls and roof and between wall panels; openings at penetrations of utility services through walls, floor, and roofs; and all other such openings in the building envelope, including access panels into unheated spaces, shall be sealed, caulked, gasketed, or weatherstripped to limit air leakage. 2. All exterior doors, other than fire -rated doors, shall be designed to limit air leakage, around their perimeter when in a. closed position. Door* between residence and garage are not considered 'fir& -rated' and must meet the above requirement. 3. All exterior windows shall be designed to omit infiltration into or from the building envelope which shall be substantiated by test ing.to Standard ASTM E 203-73. Si to built and millwork shop made wooden sash are exempt from testing but shall be weatherstripped, caulked# and made tightly fitting. 8. VAPOR BARRIERS/GROUND COVERS 1. An approved vapor barrier shall be properly installed in roof decks, in enclosed rafter spaces formed where ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters, and at exterior walls. Inset stapled batts with a perm rating less than one may be installed if the vapor barrier is to the warm side, staples are placed not more than 8 inches on center and gaps between the facing and the framing do not exceed 1/16". 2. A ground cover of 4 all. (0.004") polyethylene or equivalent, shall be laid over the ground in all crawl spaces. The ground cover shall be overlapped one foot at each joint and shall extend to the foundation wall. H. HEATING EQUIPMENT 1. Required heating system efficiencies are determined by the type of glazing installed. For a breakdown of required heating systems for each type of glazing, see Item E - Glazing, above. 2. HVAC equipment for low-rise residential shall be sized no great- er than 150X of design load. 1. FIREPLACES (Site built & zero -clearance) O 1. Fireplaces shall be provided with: a) Tightly fitting flue dampers, operated with a readily accessible manual or approved automatic control. b) An outside source for combustion air. Minimum duct size - six square inches, with readily operable damper. Outlet must be inside front of firebox. J. DUCT INSULATION 1. Duct insulation is required and shall be installed in accordance with Washington State Energy Code - Table 4-16. K. PIPING INSULATION 1. Piping for hot water/steam heating systems or piping for continuously circulating hot water service systems is required to bi insulated per Table 4-17. r_ S L. SHOWERS ' 1. All showers shall have flow control devices to limit flow y to a maximum rate of, 3 gallons per minute per shower head M. WATER HEATERS 1. Water heaters are required to meet the requirements of ASHRAE Standard 9OA-80, and be labeled as such. In addition, .electric water heaters installed in unheated spaces shall be placed on an incompressible surface or floor insulated to a minimum of R-10. ENERGY CODE ':SUMMARY Floor Area: 46-1 1 S.F. Windows and Doors S.F. Skylights x 2 S.F. Total Glazing Area .- ►Jra S.F. Glazing as a % of floor area Note: All glazing must comply with the 1986 Washington State Energy Code. Caulk and Weatherstrip all Windows, Doors, and Building Joints. M UAR� Fa -rGE :S6UMMARY RESIDENCE: Main -Floor 04P_l S.F. Upper Floor S.F. Lower Floor 1� S.F. Bonus Room*" S.F. 1 s. F. TOTAL:. GARAGE: S.F. DECK: S.F. PORCHES: - C�l S.F. OTHER: NZA S.F. LUMSER s-rRENGfTH UNITS I N PSI) Fb Fv E Joist, Rafters: HEM -FIR #2 1150 75 1,400,©00 Beams, Headers, Lintels, Girders: 411 NOMINAL DOUG-FIR #2 1250 95 1,700,000 611 NOMINAL DOUG-•FIR #1 1300 85 1,600,000 Glue Laminated Timbers: DOUG FIR LARCH 2400 V3 165 1,700,000 2400 V4 165 1,800,000 r,OADI Ng ROOF. . . . . . . .10 PSF DEAD LOAD + 25 PSF LIVE LOAD = 45 PSF FLOOR. . . . . . . 10 PSF DEAD LOAD + 40 PSF LIVE LOAD = 50,PSF CEILING. . . . . . .5 PSF DEAD LOAD + 10 PSF LIVE LOAD = 15 PSF DECK... . . . . . . 5 PSF DEAD LOAD + 60 PSF LIVE LOAD = 65 PSF INTERIORPARTITION ..'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...10 PSF EXTERIOR PARTITION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 PSF FRAME NAILING: Frame nailing to be in compliance with Table No. 25--Q, U.B.C. All joints shall occur over supports. N cc z W W SHEET 114DEX I. site plan 2. details 3. foundation plan 4. lower floor plan 5. main floor plan 6. roof framing plan 7: front and rear elevation 8. right and left elevation 9. sections 10. electrical plans IS'C•I f�� i.'y. � I - N W (Mrmri", r-- pipe_ al1'TL6-Ir A `-a • rf. d©L u l• Ft BUT[+ OP Fes -Cola.. 209v t 8 "3'S1 � ,U ' �s� �i'`1.f'• aj(' fi�Ds Holz �'ff+'ls. CG17F•l'I"I'.. y��t�( / If�M�N�tldr.l ff-M 647r-i op F- 'vn JP-, fvr- f�L'C-�S�ON ` 4-rcvq 8A51li To 'B9 Tb c rr? SIV, D,q 2ps Q RO TIE� : SC / e \ a Z .C;v D OR 18 1988 �surs ViNIT COUNTER U) W C)l 'U) W "//4•..!�� •'r■ M O Ln E a O O t v u o a 51 c 10 C_ 0 a 0 No E� O _ ' E V a U) D m 0 a 0 U O m'' c LC p � ,U 0 N v N S. 87090 5e co PERMIT COUNTER