Loading...
1225 VIEWLAND WAY.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii 13561 1225 VIEWLAND WAY GILEE� ENGINEERING l 1SSOCIATES, INC.j`Ia'�'.� • Dallas, TX GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSULTANTS • Los Angeles, CA • Madison, WI • Milwaukee, WI February 19, 1997 " • Seattle, WA • Washington, O.C. Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc.. 1300 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100 F. f V E: 1 Seattle, Washington 98109 FEB 2 199? Attention: Mr. Art Schroeder Subject: Hall Residence SEA t� IcU,h�;'Uln61ES, ANC, WASH. Edmonds, Washington ' Project No. 643-9610009 Dear Mr. Schroeder: This letter summarizes Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (Giles) observations of slope conditions below the Hall residence and provides recommendations for extending the patio foundation to bear on firm, native soils. Giles completed a reconnaissance of the slope below the Hall residence on January 23, 1997 in conjunction with a site visit to observe ongoing repair of the Beresford slide. At that time, it appeared that an area extending roughly 10 feet east of the Hall/Beresford property line had slumped down towards the Beresford upper slide block, indicating that loss of support caused by the movement of Beresford's upper slope may have contributed to or caused this localized movement. The upper limits of this localized slumping on Hall's property have exposed and partially undermined approximately a 2-foot wide segment of Hall's patio footing. Maximum downward movement of soil below the footing was approximately 18 inches. Further east on Hall's property, a roughly 20-foot wide section of Hall's slope has slipped and created a small tension crack adjacent to Hall's patio footing. Near the east end of the Hall patio, a small tension crack was moss -covered, indicating that soil creep has occurred for a number of years on this slope. This movement was not caused by or contributed to by Beresford's property condition, in our opinion. This conclusion is based primarily on the direction of movement, which is straight downslope rather than towards Beresford's property. It appears this movement represents downslope creep of the near -surface; loose, weathered slope soil estimated to be on the order of several feet (possibly 3 to 4 feet) thick. Soil creep is considered a natural and unavoidable phenomenon common on slope as steep as those below the Hall and Beresford residences. Soil creep generally occurs very gradually year after year and may occur in small increments triggered by major storm events or unusually wet weather such as has occurred recently. On January 23, 1997, Mason Excavating and Trucking was placing the easternmost gabions referenced in our Daily Field Reports prepared for the Beresford slide repair project. The eastern edge of these gabions was estimated to be approximately 7 feet from the Hall/Beresford property line. The base of the bottom row of gabions was estimated to be at approximately- elevation 294 which was considered the highest feasible elevation to support the gabions on dense, undisturbed sand required to provide a stable configuration. 19019 36th Avenue West • Suite G • Lynnwood, WA 98036 2061771-5775 • Fax 206/771-5557 • E-Mail seattle@gilesengr.com A GILES Mr. Art Schroeder G ' ENGINEERINt ISSOCIATES, INC. February 19, 1997 Project No. 6G-9610009 Page 2 During Giles ' site visit on the afternoon of January 23, Brad Mason pointed out that future access to the Hall property with heavy equipment would not be feasible after backfilling the east end of the gabion wall, and that he was willing to excavate and place additional gabions a distance of approximately 10 feet onto Hall's property (east of the property line) at this time to buttress the previously mentioned slumped soils. Due to the anticipated depth of excavation to reach bearing soils for these additional gabions, and the steep slope angle from the proposed cut to the Hall patio, and considering that a portion of the soil which would be exposed by this cut had already slumped, it was recommended that the excavation not proceed further east than its present location at approximately the property line. The excavation between the end of the gabions and the propert;, line was subsequently backfilled with quarry spalls and gabion placement continued to the west on the Beresford property. Soil Conditions Soil conditions were explored at the Hall patio footing where the maximum amount of subsidence (approximately 18 inches) was observed. Soils were explored using a hand auger and Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). The DCP blowcounts indicated on the attached hand auger log are corrected to represent approximate Standard Penetration Test (SPT) "N" values which give an indication of the relative density of the site soils. The hand boring revealed approximately 1 %i feet of loose, silty sand beginning at the surface and interpreted to represent fill and weathered soils. Below 1 i2 feet, soils graded to afirm, tan, gravelly medium sand increasing to dense below a depth of 3 feet. 1 ire dense, gravelly, sand continued to the bottom of the exploration at approximately 7 feet. Recommended Repair The Hall residence patio footing has been exposed and partially undermined within a section up to 10 feet in width at the northwest patio corner, by the above -mentioned soil movement. Further downslope creep of the slope surface is likely to continue slowly over time and could further undermine this footing causing settlement of the patio and separation from the house. It is recommended that new foundation support for the patio be obtained by pouring a new footing directly below and connected to the old footing. This new footing should bear on the firm/dense native gravelly sand anticipated to exist at depths of 2 to 3 feet below the existing footing. New footings could be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. The actual depth required should be established in the field by a Giles representative once excavation is in progress. The excavation required to expose the suitable bearing layer will temporarily undermine the existing footing. Therefore the new footing should be poured in two stages of about 5-feet width each. Once the initial section has cured, the remaining section could be excavated, formed, and poured in one, final stage. All excavation activity should be performed by hand. Excavated soil should be saved. Once the footing has cured, the soil should be placed and compacted against the outside face of the footing to a depth of at least 2 feet. The soils should be sloped to promote drainage away from the footing. It is likely that soil on the slope below the Hall patio (and the rest of the slope on adjoining properties, for that matter) will continue to creep downslope at very slow rates as they have; done for many years. leis is a rat'aral and unavoidaHe process. Efforts to prevent creep would be cost prohibitive and of little value unless structures are threatened. The patio repair described above provides a low-cost, effective GILES ENGINEERING (-')SSOCIATES, INC. Mr. Art Schroeder February 19, 1997 Project No. 6G-9610009 Page 3 means of protecting the portion of the patio which was undermined during the Beresford slope repair. The most notable sliding on the Hall property occurred near the Beresford property line and was most likely triggered by the adjacent slide on the Beresford property. This slide has since been repaired with rock armor which should buttress these soils and reduce the chance of further downslope movement of these soils (other than natural creep). Concentrated water sources discharging on slopes such as from downspouts drains or broken irrigation pipes increase the potential for landslides and erosion. It is therefore recommended that all such potential sources he eliminated. Two drains currently discharge onto the slope approximately 20 feet below the patio. It was originally recommended that these drains be tightlined to an appropriate drain at the base of the slope. When Brad Mason's crew was on -site, Mr. Hall reported that they tested the downspout discharges and the referenced drains do not carry only water collected in footing drains and patio drainage. The volume of water generated in these drains is, therefore, not considered necessary to tightline to the base of slope. Attempts should be made to divert sheet -flow water away from the top of the slope if possible. Sheet -flow off the Hall patio, however, is considered to be a relatively minimal volume. Attempts to collect this water could lead to a potential concentrated source point were the collection system to fail. Therefore, no collection of the water off the patio is deemed necessary at this point. We trust this letter serves to meet your.current needs. If further recommendations are required, please call at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. John E. Zipper, P.L. Regional Manager 6g-9610009 F EB Z 1 139( PgjI lu tltialfdhIfN auL691ES, INC. SEATTLE, WASH. ,�/ 17/ 7 ( 1 VJ : JJ U 1 LCn MNU 1 N=K 1 NU '7 Glib ed i 4011 nu.JWJ reeJ/eeJ d IZZS Memorandum pERMVT COUNTER Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 19019 36h Ave. W.; Suite G Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (206)771-5775, FAX(206)771-5557 To: Art Schroeder Pacific Engineering Technologies, Inc. From: Monte Reinders, John Zipper Date: March 11, 1997 Subject: Hall Residence Patio Repair This letter and the attached figure present our findings of soil conditions at the base of the Hall residence patio corner. The hand auger boring was completed earlier for our previous letter but has been included here for reference as well. Soils were explored today by hand excavating and probing in front of and below the foundation at several locations. The excavations were performed in the area where the majority of downslope creep appears to have occurred as described in previous letters. Sections A -A' and B-B' on the attached figure are drawn through the areas where excavations were performed below the existing foundation. The excavations exposed the base of the concrete footing at both of the locations. Generally, it appeared that the outer 6 to 8 inches of the footing edge is situated on very loose topsoil and fill and in places has been undermined by downslope soil movement. The remaining footing area appears to be supported on a very dense, gravelly sand deposit. Probing in front of the footing revealed that the dense, gravelly sand layer dives off at an inclination of 1H:1 V or steeper, presumably matching the angle of the existing steep slope. The material between approximately the concrete patio wall face and the top of the slope, a horizontal distance of about 4 feet, appears to consist primarily of fill with a mantle of topsoil. Based on earlier observations at the property line during the Beresford slide repair, it is estimated that an approximately 4400t thick veneer loose fill and "slope wash" material mantles the dense native soil on the slope. Based on the observed conditions, it is recommended that the patio foundation be underpinned as planned to reduce the chance for structural damage if further downslope movement of the slope soils occurs. It is understood that underpinning will consist of hand excavating below the foundation in the central portion of the affected area and pouring a concrete footing 5 feet wide which will be embedded into the dense native soil which exists below the foundation. It is recommended that the footing extend approximately 3 feet below the base of the existing foundation. In this way, foundation support would be obtained from dense soils approximately 3 feet below the inferred plane of soil movement at the fill/native contact. Giles should be allowed to observe soil conditions in the footing excavation prior to pouring concrete to verify that the footing extends the recommended depth into the bearing layer. Additionally, the location of the footing should be field located in consultation with Giles Engineering. J/ 11/ 5 f 17 • YJJ U 1 Lt5 tIVU 1 IVCtK 1 IVU 'y CYJO COL 4011 IVU.1tOZ I-'0061WU4 TFrr 7"r Ili I 14ro � �,MccFr�+► �j 7 _ f ig ' '! -.✓sr� & 4M24Y W GILES ENGINEERING l /SSOCIATES, INC. J� 11/ 7 ( L7 • rr+ U 1 LCJ tIVU 11VCCK 1IVU -7 GYJO GOl 4bl l NU. 1= i4 04/WW4 GILES' ENGINEERING 6 7SSOCIATES, INC. HAND AUGER LOGS 6M-9612001 R. HAND AUGER 1 Date Completed: Jan. 24, 1997 Apprx. Elevation: 6'/: feet below deck NMM Loose, wet, dark brown, organic -rich silty SAND 12 40 SO 70 1 Firm, wet, tan, fine gravelly, medium 3= with trace silt Grades to dense Grades to gravelly coarse Sit Grades to coarse, sandy GRAVEL Refusal on gravel 2 3 4 5 6 7 Boring terminated at approximately 6' - 8" 9 9 10 11 12 m N(Dcp)represents the Standard Penetration Resistance value (N) correlated with Dynamic Cone Penetration values obtained in the field PLANNING DATA NAME: M1, rz( SITE ADDRESS: l ZZ 5 U10-w (&,.o( W DATE:___ SlZ/9 ZONING: 125-( Z _ PLAN CHK#: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:��o,ti_ CORNER LOT Nd (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: ZS' Left Side: (a ' Right Side: lo' Rear: z5 Actual Setbacks: Front: 7Ic)' Left Side: r 2-' Right Side: -7o Rear: 32-' Street map checked for additional setback required? M (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED /V (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: 35'7 Actual: h6 BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed: Z5 ' Actual Height: 5' 1 Datum Point: ter, Datum Elevation: A.D.U. CREATED?: 4 SUBDIVISION: 97- 66, req.,,,d _ a„A LA- 77-47- ,�,. CRITICAL AREAS #:' --� SEPA DETERMINATION: (� (C,JU,A O"S Gw'suv r., — S7/2i,1?— W .sn t .,4Y LOT AREA: A- �� ((a S OTHER: Plan Review By: y°F °"�tiG BOLDING CITY OF EDMONDS MAY 16 1997 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Underpin and repair a retaining wall for a patio on a site designated on the City's Environmentaly Sensitive Areas Map (City of Edmonds Building Plan Check for Hall). Proponent: Mr. David Hall Location of proposal, including street address if any: 1225 Viewland Way, Edmonds, Washington Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is.available to the public on request. X There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: (206) 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: 5 4LT-7 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 2— , 1997, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections.. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on y / f & / , 1997, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Page 1 of 2 PCHALL_D.DOC 5/15/97.SEPA Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX Applicant: Mr. David Hall 1225 Viewland Way Edmonds, WA 98020 XX Engineers: Art Schroeder Pacific Engineering Technologies 1300 Dexter Ave. N., Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98109 pc: File No. PC-97- SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 PCHALL D.DOC 5/I5/97.SEPA Date: MEMORANDUM May 15, 1997 To: File No. Plan Check for Hall (Building Permit) From: M.E. Meg Gruwell � ' Via: Jeffrey S. Wilson, Responsible Official Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR HALL RETAINING WALL REPAIR; FILE NO. PC - HALL I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmental checklist and building . permit application materials (including a geotechnical reports, which have been prepared for the project. A copy of these are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that an environmental determination of nonsignificance be issued for the project. Should you have any questions concerning the information in this memorandum, please contact me. Review by Responsible Official I concur: ✓ I do not concur: Comments: J2 5— !6 1 Jef ey S. Wilson Date Attachments pc: File No. PC -Hall City of Edmonds cQ Planning Division PCHALL_C.DOC 05115/97. OF EDP 0 d CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Fst. 1 g90 Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants. - This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about -your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best.of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not'know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Pr a R e_ s d P to cc r 4-6 %�,, a s 4 Pa {- , 2. Name of applicant: Pa c_1 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact,person: 13 O o AV ty 0 +4-, S,, I O o Se a O9 ./N. r Te d 7 S 0 0 Page 1 of 24 CHUT.D001•NOV-93 MASMMSPEA 4. Date checklist prepared: N[ a-,f 8 > 1397 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): I m rn e j , a f e.l u.rs or\ a. n l r% and r 216 rn (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. . hl a (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. C r I i I _a Is.�e_as C{, p L! �-i- rl 4 Zi s /9 7 (STAFF COMMENTS)_"A'It 4 r ;"SIC. 9"1 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the.property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. iJ o (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 2 of 24 CHKLT"OC1 Dl-NOV-93 MAMRWEA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. [t C_If .J e E4In,ond5 b,4, I J n Ae.rmJ of I, 1•r d �7y 4:.1 ri C u r• r e_n (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. t ! Thy _S �' c�r•rtiP r• //+o f an P x r 4'i' ! n _ j�,'a r'e a,n,rla iJIL Th,.� Tuo�1r1 e !S �n % , In s�� 1) e P� 'V,2 u rl Pro , r, 17k I I V_ h Q r- s n ► %S I� -I` , or% fh//� a � , a e e,ac.(s �'inC. ��t Tl �ar-ii.' s1�,o e M a v ! t ,} C c:J r-% I n K e j u h G e r rv1 r n I�"� x► s f .� QP (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and.topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 12 2.5 `% i 3e y_i I r1 d I/J s A r- R_ 'k R r7 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 3 of 24 CHKLMDOC11•NOV•93 MASTEMSPEA_ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS L. . Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: nor• o -, r- i' � o �' �S � i' � 4 ��� � �c ci ,� u,� n cS i' �e 42 J �e (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. iQ+o sdr.c) ovez-la►n 6y 1-ftN ra- }-h,c�snr-sS O? T. artCl GGuut/�uK7 �eaTm �n�fe-.oa/�s' -1 (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. ,1 e.rrn c- r2 ejo 0 n a r^ - 5.s rf 4U-e.. 'f'a S11TG�b S)...92 �na�-� R eC'4-.'f anti u l�c� O�T'o b t� 19 Ce 49 r% 1 to r4l. L%A t� (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 4 of 24 CHKLT.DOCU-NOV-93 MASCEMSPEA e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Appa�x�tir�L-r 2 Y v' or FILL Ts-_� b : PLtsc.cn To Co.i� R C,c 1 5 r'c Fo o TI r., c, (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. � G► �'1 � �r u n � r � ...,. t� o r- � a r � a i j ILS S '� rti (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? �Q GI1 ar,c e. � r L Ar-re-n� N� 4mr2re.il.=$us 8Ur&C-e-S "A. cI P r, Imo.s�'ris a r, ALroa . (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: k �c.i r j n a� b e d o c. f + k -� �u r ^ '{" C !' r'•+- .� a.. ice. S (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Z Y o3 OF (STAFF COMMENTS) _ r I 44 ..� a nn a f'c.�-1 .S a S a e per o x I n ,�i w.s Gn. r-T r. Tb 8 c Pi-- CO Page 5 of 24 CHUT.DO01-NOV-93 MASIERWEA b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: _ Qne— (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes; describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Nfl (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 6 of 24 CHUT.D000-NOV-93 MASIEMSPEA (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. u� (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 of 24 CHKLT.DOCU-NOV-93 MAS MSHA (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if -applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N 1_2 n �C1 1, ., ��� P 1 s �-1 !. s , �a Ce (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N� (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 8 of 24 CHKLT.DOCV-NOV-93 MASIER\SPEA 4. Plants a. Check or'circle types of vegetation found on the site: D< deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: +� evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs >41 grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 9 of 24 CHKLT.DOCU-NOV-93 'MASTER\SPEA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Adel ' 1P-j2 , �.�a �� 2 -r p� U� 5k:>11. To C �.i r�z t✓ f. l 5 r 1 �, c- j� n� � �,�/,n. � F� v r t ,.� � k./,+1 � i� RCP1.Ac1'trt L LU Cm141►-4 (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: L-1 " K ",> V-j )--I birds:' hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. u n kr, cam; r-, (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 24 CHUT.DOGMI-NOV-93 MASTERWEA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: v n �.- (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,'manufacturing, etc. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. � o (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: " (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 11 of 24 CHKLT.DOCH-NOV-93 MAS18R\SPEA 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. N ��t (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? �-4 on e (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 12 of 24 CHKLT.DOCU •NO V-93 MAMTRISPFA (2) What types and levels df noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. tt n r2 r r=1 i' C- CJ s r kA c e Q4 t A 1 T .-y, a r, 7 cnnsjru JInl � Le -,I h-C �,m; +k fir`„" IONtil 7o S PM (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: I� s r(Q. Cr cr i ,.1 Fta c ,t-4 7 f-4ib (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? S LrC F t--t-4 . s i o r,._, c r (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. � o (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 13 of 24 CHKLT.D0C\I-N0V-93 MASPEMSPEA c. Describe any structures on the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What is the current zoning classification of the site? S 1,. CC tvC 1— Pa- t.-A I (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (STAFF.COMMENTS) ..J g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? U"u - (STAFF COMMENTS) td'r k- Page 14 of 24 CHUT.DOCU-NOV•93 MASTEMSPEA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. r-o (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 1-4 (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: IQ�T (STAFF. COMMENTS) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: �J �rl tr. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page IS of 24 CHKLT.DOCU-NOV-93 MASMRVSPEA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. IV.2N(� (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? O The n r—r e (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 24 CHUT.DC01-NOV-93 MASMR\SPEA - b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? . (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N.on'p— (STAFF COMMENTS) U KLMDOCU-NOV-93 MASMR\SPEA Page 17 of24 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? y r, kr, (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: " -->nL (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 18 of 24 CHKLT.DOMI-NOV-93 NLkMRXSPEA 13. .Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or neat to the site? If so, generally describe. r, e_ r% r, .Z_1 r- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or neat to the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. �Show on site plans, if any. ' `' \iitQ 1]�an S�1�M l V1GwI r-% 1 VI v A r C c-4t- Er n� m 12 'rK 16, %1 c�Llyb , �C S R S 4 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 19 of24 CHUT.D001-NOV•93 MASTEMSPP.A b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? U„ k.h0S4.n (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How manywouldthe project eliminate? N� C6 noc Ire t^GC�d��GtS !Jar Lc�/�G I+j D P a s -e- d (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 20 of24 CHKLT.DOC\I-NOV-93 MAMR1.SPEA C How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Ong (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.I-NOV-93 Page 21 of 24 16. Utilities A. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: L Yl�r1-c 1r1 tJr oiL are-'-. pT awnSTrw�_�i n (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed hJ o r:, -e (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted r Page 22 of 24 CHKLTZMI-NOV-93 MASiEMPEA PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE: NONE C ENERAL F4-:PAIR NOTES: I. DO NOT SCALE DRAWNGS. 2. VERIFY ALL GRADES AND EXISTNG CONDITIONS AT THE SITE BEFORE PROCEEDINGS WITH THE WOW, GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE PREMISE TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE WORK BEFORE SUBMITTNG BID. 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY OoeR 4. CONTACT THIS OFFICE AT (206) 281-'1500 IF ANY ADDITIONAL. DAMAGE IS FOUND DURNG THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT EFFORTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE ADECUATE SHORNG, BRACING AND GUYS N ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL SAFETY ORDINANCES. PERMITS: CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTNG WORW, STRUCTURAL NOTES: fCQ2€ THE UNIFORM BUILD Ws CODE (UBC) 1994 EDITION LIVE LDADS• PATIO LOAD 60 PSF FREI R TO PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN PATIO EXIST. SINGLE STORY RESIDENCE W/ DAYLIGHT BASEMENT IN NORTHWEST PORTION AT 1225 YIEWLAND WAY RESIDENCE GARAGE PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1" ■ 20.0' DRIVEWAY VIEWLAND WAY AREA OF SOIL SLOUGNNCa `� EXISTWG CONCRETE IWETANNG WALL EXISTNG WOOD FRA IED DECK AENOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE PATIO SLAB 7'-b'YO d; C-SOTECHNICAL ENGNEER 16[ } TO VERIFY PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION I . ADD FILL IN HATCHED AREA -- V— FOOTNL 1� (MA-SUs x B' LO W (ACE Caen AL. I FACE OF WALL). -/ r--I I I I I I I 1 I I I I PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE, 114" . I'-C" CPi?-..uA 5-�b ) EXISTING PERII'IEfER FOUNDATION WALL OF HOUSE RER FOA CITY OF EDMONDS ASSET INFORMATION SHEET L� NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. STM�­":7f FILE DESCRIPTION �4- r/i L ��✓r`� SERIAL NO. LOCATION �_ f DEPT. NO. " PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST * PROJECT NUMBER kzsz�Aw PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COSTa•a� B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. OUD-Di -5�a. 'd4 -4s ESTIMATED LIFE - ,INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY 9DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE t(p) INITIAL DEPARTMENT FILE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO.- 04118/197 10:20 2057830305 101 of 11 r V I U4UO Z01 401L 84/18/1997 09:02 2067930395 CCCI PAGE 03 YAL I FIQ M TECH 14003 Ct�Ci PAGE Of G! ME NO,,,, ` �"6tlJ Cr ldcal Ames Chal0ft W„i�M� iv fli@7 �I�i,/Ir.YY�s. Site Information goiia � / � pography/ hydrgt,0 /w tj0n) I. Site Addno Locatioaz Y v B. 2 Property TAX Afte m NuMbou. 1 — O Q - -: 0005. Appraxiaa is Site Size (acM or Upme fsetj: r a~0 /�•► 4. Is flak W" Y dav►elopw? ✓ yes; M. 1i Yet; how is We dayslopedf 5_i,.� f TOW , i..I 5 • i3escsibm the gesveral acts .il+Php• amk an ehat aIy. Flat: k:33 th= 5-19et aiWatipn Change OVW I Vdn ait46. Roping: slopes on site genoraLly IM than 1A (A valfial rise of It) -fee t *Vft +o h¢sr=vnteI diet me of 66-feet), rwe of 10-1eat ov= in hori.z=tall dii6tace of 33 6 6 9ett). swep. grad" of IF"* than 30% pregmt on site (a v a hesizox+td d�tanee Of less *m >�fect� � e;�6°Q rim of itP�i�t aver 00= (phase ); 6• S1* tontain9 arras of year-roxM n awUng wester mow; A �s of pprox. Depth., �NIUM standing rvafiaz: Appm, pWptle What mom*) of the yeas? 8. :5dta .ia i:'► tlta tioedway�.,,o flo�plaiYt_.3�� a� a water aansra�. 9. Situ MIA" a or as rile® wh,re w,eter flaws &OW ft M � �PgzeuruC!? �� �urFaca? p},tst� Ue Y Flows axle $aluorwl? —Y4 0 (Vvhat titer of YM? I ). 10. 50e is IYrimArily: forested - : meadow FhrAw— ' usbact leasdscaped (lawa,shmtps eta) 11. Obvious wedaad is preses►t on site: •w.'!b �:. .. M _., .MY �1 .. 'li 1.•tom 1 rF••.r 1. silo is ZcW ? � z. SO mstpped soil type{i), 1. M n ii;o A ri ��I' o t..at'�5 3. We dard Wit; tY' of it+arttian�prt:s _o;.C-1R.»�ts1ust4i�' ''11r. a►lthaw aisai � M '�,� i� Pr�S '' �4et''Itki�;tiitl�tdaQ'' "ti; ,; •l d.&bt�i��oni'�Y�r���}d!►�lts'�'E'-'.•'%'�a•.,.,,.�`�Jtl:': , 'pJII •1�P�.Jfriti 'YV'i•r N�:�•�' ul/�� j'1 M'` l.•n' - .,.; �.f�Afl • , �•� ,. ,.S Y1 .r�'1l �`. ..'•Y rr..�r�:: ,�`• ''iN w�`, f.�rLr, . i:1. �. .' n•-."YP ..y, dl,.,., , .�yy 1 y� ,ye y\.:, q`..�•{. M .i i�rf�q.:JV ri,l'IP rY `i �i �'•. •.?+tl': 1:' ti_ • • 1' �'�~1.:1�;.9. ; . .r .'• ,.. i • �j'4 •�,: �r, j �. 'f 1 • V � !, �• r r n 1 Y 1 r • (:"'•rl:JArM r •M•L''.i.r:,•'.'�r� •_�,•'y��: �.4��•�-+r �t�.ee r '•��.F�. •Z!•i��i•::i��' rn err .. 1.1 �+ f • ;^"�: 'i'a`:•'.... �t�� 4 �t'�.'�.�'•4 �'. ..r F �~ •�r.."kr,`:•1.�'Y: � v�t1Y� 4�.i.,.; w �wwt1M • . r' • 04/18/1997 10:20 2067830305 uu/ lo; N I il: uo wcuv 404 KQl L Q%I MJf &W f k1''IS bl lidb f tJ Ibil15 CCCI PACE 02 ry4�rla avvx ca..cs �. yy�ur ;a NACso 03 City of Edmon& Ili 1t sae. t age Be Critical Men Oetk!bt contained on fl* form is to be filled out by any iersQr preparing a DeYciopment Pcsmit Applieationtor the City of Edmonds prior to has/her submittal of a development perazut to the City. The purpoao of the Checklist is to enible City ataii to debumww rwhethes any. potential Critical !gear are or rmy be present on the subject property. The information needed to cornpiete the Checklist should to W"ay awaflabla from obmervatiara of tha Waite as data aVattablo At COY hall (CrldW Areas inventories, tups, of soft Surveys). An appl%ssat, or his/Im representative, rnuot fill out the checklist sigrt and date it, and sub it to the City. The City will review ft char ldiat, amd a a prU'--UMry aiba Visit, and Ma lm a dewardradon of tip isubsaquent steps riwasay to emplete a development permit application. NYC t •a. 7•^ +gtlr,• ti.. ' Wit1;'a evpy ;de-isoxm, the applkant sioid also Submit a Wdxft , map of plot pLu for 4%l'vI4x% lots of the pucel, with sough deta g that City sm f ear+► find and identYyr the subject pavei(s)- U &tdition, tine 4pplitaw oh*U iadmIc other parbnard Ynfonast4on (e g, It" plat, topography map, stL) at 44dies in conja'adion with ft Ch%kHst to ass in reaxtpi�kiaxg theIr prellml as nt�t»t atihe site. 1 have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). 'eelr/ Appl#tant: A,�pk$carrteiaaantaii3ises - A r-4 ScS,-oe.=I 4r.r �• CASE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC. ��i �� t. �.Go do 5&.e , q T{��`, ^ e Name Ns� --r-- 9757 Greenwood Ave No Strast Addreaa Seattle, WA 98103 783--4377 Ca , stm ZIP Mime z &L A srsn�r* MIA Srr art�A4ddrm 's "LE I A. IUh. 15 §109 z g ! -75bb C l'Saw Mr Phw* siomtum 'Ipave City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Hall Determination #: CA-97-47 Project Name: Permit Number: Site Location: 1225 Viewland Way Property Tax Acct #: 7295-000-004-00 Project Description: Non -Project Specific Determination: Study Required The purpose of this study would be to identify the location and type of the slope and the required buffers and setbacks. The slope appears to be a Steep Slope Hazard Area. This would need to be confirmed with a Geotechnical study. If it is a Steep Slope Hazard Area, a buffer of 50 feet is required from the top of the bank/slope and a 15 building setback from the edge of the buffer. The Geotechnical study may recommend a modification of the 50 buffer down to 10 feet. If an applicant feels that their development proposal will not effect the Critical Area in any way, they may request a Conditional Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Study. Conditional Waiver Criteria must.be reviewed on a project by project basis and all criteria must be found to apply: I . There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; 2. The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; 3. The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; 4. The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: a.) "relevant conditions" Stephen Bullock April 21, 1997 Name Sig ature Date • CITY of EDMJVDS For Inspection Call 771-320 Address of Construction: SVE SE-WE'R PERMIT 2 !1 `l� ► � PERMIT NO. 07628 �a�� �I�a Fic.Jl a�►1aQ C.t� EDMONDS TREATMENT PLANT Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Builder: td/ <cCAq"'1 F �a�" �¢ 4��`1 Contractor & License No: /6 r<5 L'o_J15 �. Z',J�, 66,//,CSC Single Family Residence Multi -Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No-' ✓� Yes' -(If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number PLEA E READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK rti that I have read and shall comply Date ,/'e th the items listed on the back. Permit Fee:. 310•aD Trunk Charge: *-)-S• DD Assessment Fee: IssuedBy,: Date 'Issued: Receipt No.: (p3�IZ Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date. Initial oRejected: Reason Date Initial v **.PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** a� cr: Wh-ite Copy - File Green Copy - Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing NEW CONSTRUCTION X REPAIRS ❑ OWNER-------------------------------------------/B11_t. ------- JOB ADDRESS -12.25 ----- - 144:1 ------ islip VY--*.W%JE PWW4Wl-ll/75 (REV.11/78) EASEMENT NO- ------------- ------------------------------ LID NO- ------------------ - ASMT. NO. ------------------ CONTRACTOR ... PERMIT NO. 7(D-2.9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ----- 4 --------------------------- BLOCK NO. PMPNP�. ------ TREATMENT PLANT NAME OF ADDITION. F�Zlsl,luz! - c^F - 9 1.5,J)P. 4� Approved: DATEJ6Mlt"lA.!9.QP-7- BY -1201x-f ----------------------- F CITY of EDMI#DS p SSE SEWER PERMIT For Inspection Call 771-3202 PERMIT No. 070 9.4 DEC 111986 Address of Construction: Property Legal'.Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Builder: &6AigA1 Lc4_SAM Contractor & License No: Single Family Res idence Multi Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No L,--" Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way 'Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-.5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No.� Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.). PLEASE READ THE'ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK Al. I certify that,I have read and shall comply' Date with the items listed on the back. o Permit Fee: ;L 5 U Issued By: Trunk Charge: 3b 00 Date Issued:y? C) Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: (0 Partial Inspection: Comments -Date. Initial, " Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial oRejected:. Reason, Date Initial v • v , ** PERMIT MUST, BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** > A White Copy - File Green Copy - Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant "A Good Customer is Worthy of Every Consideration" N UTILITIES SUP.P° V CO . 7 �X/�ST8=1Z Waterworks & Sewerage Supp',--� e.4000 BooNE 5409O,HIO AVE. SO. P.O. BOX 11437 P.O. BCX 3524 °' SPOKANE, WA 99211 '----'SEATTL'E`WN9D124 -"' """' -' ` " `-" 5351396-""-- 762-7025 I , M 1'T • � C w G.(� 176 2,8 W , cam, vNtz p ti te S T-a Vj o,1-1i�J C 2 S - 5 . 1'"" C �(Z Ivy "- t �.r76c +i %S r� SEATTLE TOLL SPOKANE 1-800.562.1065 FREE 1-800-572-0531 PRaTBCr MMEW CHDCXUST MV= NAME.- PRWEM ADDRE$S: jiph 1CATION PB=IPT UNTE.- by. CV64ENTS PLANNING WrR/SWR I STMT I ENSMG FIRE BUILDING /77777777 //M/h/w 7.,1,T,=- FM43iY/muLTnnz/ca4.xrcy:AL - (Circle One) I - - ,-755U,,QMzKM— - g f7 Pla-r—inim- 177111117 17111711 7T7/--//7T/7 �-,VUSE Pmmril 2 777777 WUIRDEM CHMM w/M 3 171711 7777T77777 - rCTI'n. ZONING MUIREMBM 4 ,,q--TB SMPF, VMIaB ACMS 777777777 ///////// 6 -7777U-M111111 771-777TFI -/7T//-//7 PLAN (On Site) f;,z L-21 elllolff 4/A,74 7 f -771171 171111111 117711111 11711111 F7LE 8 DESCRIPTIOW VFRIFICATIaijo,�--4 11-1177777771111 9 �M �5,77-CLAIM/DEDICATIONS 111177 77/7=7T/-/= 71117111 10 PLMIITC/PRTvh7E 77777777- 777m7ff 77TF177T —7- 777777 777111171777777777 7.pTp, j3R,,,,M CVOMCTIQM IF 140 LIDA 2 TMOM 13 ---77T97T1777Tf77 -OF-WAY MIMUCTION PEMIT REM /a/um MR P011LIC IMPROVEM-M �15 oumvp1mus & mum 111177174mm ki.,-:2 FIRM afaywv 11111111,111ifill IV 16 -,,7,U 13AVfNr. REQUIRED R 17 TI 7 -777 7 T1 7 7-TH I TI - Tfl7t? J7 7 T1- 17 U171,11 Mn anTa RO _W RM RBMIRM 111117 171111117171111111 "-/-/ff 7P/////7 77777T17Ti on, r`OR DRIVEWAY Reon 20 111711117 777717717 T/7T/7-/77i' SjQj MDQn T77;T/T/-/ 21 11-1777 711717717 SYCADM ROM -11RUITR771177 21 T/77 1 iM�-a AVA.XIARTLITY L7, TIT177=1771 it ��aTW M-77 Ll:'�'-1-1�;G t4ATM MAIN SIZE 2e IRT7 111711 7 i/77R' 1 SIZE. TFi -777 Tf 11111H111 T/ 7TI F/7; TH-111 11711 LINE Srz!?,. 125 REQUTRM. 771,717 11IT177T1,171 //' RUT SIZE EXMING T11777WI 77TI77 777T= awNwrION M-PECTION Ew ////// ///////// 29 'TfTTFI 7T/777777 MPTM CfIARGC 30 11111177 77777,777 C SPR -M LIM CHAJ= PEQD IPT cur 32 DITCH EXISTING -17-177777T f11111111 33 -MTIT 7T777 --'--77TR-I 35 17 171111111 rl,,�m BASnM P= -7777 111111777 __136 137 77-7/7 ICATED CRT SITE PLAN 38 pffz OPIN RUNOFF 39 111117771 40 TiT"71M BY-. PLANNING ENGINEERING MGR. PUBLIC WORKS MGR. �1 ww w�. ww� J �w M� N l o O(;z- ------------- 20'� 265 i �' - -� • • I 275 _�•--- i 276 - • 280 -� rnI I ' N n1a, asp �1 r'r n B8 , Wit- ---- - - \ `` \ n --- --- aoo__c_ N� e ---- ti A r�� _-- • N �-.� ��;; i;`�: a� :��4_ _-� - � 1 1 31��� 20 r t � 134 IN INV � r � �., ♦j1322 }).Z ` t" � .r 325 � '� `�'�� ,`� fJ,f is i ;��', \ O •., ,.J};>:,,,$ pp�, .�:�^,: i .I. ; as O 1.:,..;.•.4�`tLS:'�'.+�'eeryK:Y'u. r'u U1,1 y r •� , 350 --- G'ITY_-©F _ OPEIJ SP�4C-E w•7 OMONDS' 'r °---------- - i - -- PAF'll I CITY OF' COMONOS M. >1(� �t ... � 4 e„ _...-•�.+-eror4.�M0.'.wm5?�'1'knlfwmnT,MF*F.i,o-' �__...rtkT�r'i^—r'r'p."-�-,.,""^_ _ ,. _ - .�_ _ `_-_.�____-_— —_ _ CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) 14AU N ._....._ Mpl, peze,�+tr_—w tLL W3Uci, t iA IN c , ADDRESS 11�)55 tyu4U`' CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Is e I- �e V V k5 Lori-, NAME h�r-;"r> NoP wN CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER 1 RCS ��� cif Legal Description of Property - Include all easements (show below or attach four copies) L_� 44 - ® NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADD/ALTER COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REPAIR RETAINING WALL SIGN EXCAVATE FENCE El DEMOLISH LLTE FILL (( X FT) ❑ PRE•MOVE INSPJ SWIM REMODEL COMPLIANCE INSP. POOL WO10 SERT a APT. BLDG r RENEWAL USE PERMIT ZONE i NUMBER JOB ADDRESS 7- % j- I EGAL DESSCRIPPTTIION CHHEECK SUBDIVISION NO. zqr VVV ,yam PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING EOUIREDDEDICATION _ PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED ❑ SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED METER SIZE IBUILDING SUPPLY SIZE REMARKS UNITS Q 3 SIGN AREA I ENV. REVIEW I ADB NO. ALLOWED I PROPOSED COMPLETE I EXEMPT SHORELINE# VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS ' E IGHT LOT COVERAGr FRONT ` SIDE REAR REMARKS i NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF FA DWELLING I v UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) r CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION I SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUP REQUIRED GROUP ❑ YES ❑ NO Occur xlnCq lv� VALUATION PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require Separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days ENERGY CODE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors In interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT modify,.waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED tI n Insurancq., INSPECTION SIGNATURE (OWNER OR JAGEN DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF 04, ..3 q I DE �',j� HEIGHT CY OCCUPANT V LOAD un kcq d- FEE U-o I -,!�,Ig4 APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE RELEASED BY: DATE O 2 0 J_ D m IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10248 MEMO TO: Building Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: /��J! i//EW�'9�0 After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: 1) Connection to City water system required. 2) Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. 3) Right-of-way permit required for any work.,on City property. 4) Driveway slope not to exceed 14%. 5) Back water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 6) Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7) Builder/owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties in any way. Construction hours from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays.