Loading...
1234 VIEWLAND WAY.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii 13562 1234 VIEWLAND STREET FILE .e� rd UJA �� FILE# N/A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal _ -ate C Retaining WallsFI LC Proponent Eric Partch Location of proposal, including street address, if any 1234 Viewland Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 Lead Agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. X There is no comment period for this DNS. _ This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official John Bissell Position/Title Code Enforcement Tech. Phone 771-3202 Address 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds WA 98020 Date November 6, 1990 Signatures-�� —_ X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m. November 16, 1990 by filing a written appeal citing reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact John Bissell to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area." respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: &Avs-r2 U C r A M ASON R Y WALL T v f,Gr7-AIN qM 6xrS7'11\1� 6P0PC. 2. 'Name of applicant: (5-R.l C T) , ?4 RTC 14 ( COuTw cT P&-gsw) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: A. 4FL) OAJ1 s, CJ 14 gSO2.0 4. Date checklist prepared: l (9l3 o l �C) 5. Agency requesting checklist: � bm Opi Os � N-" lvc) be--p-' 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): (.oN� -riz vc. v A3 T o P6 v— ►',+ 1 T 63rAPC4—T(F7.1 cJJTVitJ !-2 mo)1TNS. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • 4 54ILS, ST v 0Y cal= '1'ftc; :-dT 4 045 l:Oru6: 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. r/v 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. guicolvc, :JCzcm iT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You"do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) CONST(ZLX7 A fZE//JFORCGU 00P-SOfV2Y CIS C.L. T-6 26-rP ► r0 /4tJ x SST //S R49,) , 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklists 12 Sq V1eLJL.4IJ-D WAY J�� NENo/NCB Pb"rMiT �ForA0MO-S Lt/R G)POucRrroClrE AAr, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. G eral description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, tee ffl—ob-e-s-]?mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 7-2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. DC/jsE -r-0 V-L—ay Ar NSo= J POOpWI SOA.:r45F-o S /CT y w rr§4 4,)ZAU L ( ()c,a(-/14L-riC.o) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. �/q► I f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. t\J 0 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: lfG7 f -063 ECT /S 4cT/9/n�/rtl(� k)ACI_ "r)PcCrr(CAc(Y 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No"c 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. z 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /v 0 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. /VoNg- 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. %V O 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flobdplain? If so, note location on the site plan. /IO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /v%0 b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give generaldescription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N! 0 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does N r APp. Y c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. VP°1.I CCMPLE7Ionl, ON S ITL /2VN6Sr-r OIL(- Via' C4'LL'F(.'('EC� I R-N 6 13 S (1t5- TENTIaN C STEM A Nr3 1 ISCMARC►t#.) AA 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. O'D d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other O►C` _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _ shrubs CONST2 OCTI()N• _ grass _ _ pasture (%tr GL-TAT► tt j _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? l� t 5? tf Q F, 6-0 Z; tie ► nfC.l OLD. ()THb2 ON -SIT - IC IN(TA-"c 17 I-4 N p'CC A Pi NC) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N () d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NdK)�-: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds . heron, eagle. �d'ngb other .. mammals: deer, bear, elk, bar, other: .!�Q41JKALA.Sr..f C>!?5t).16A....... fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: .................... b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Natue c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. N O d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: �1'D 1�rs 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wogd stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating. manufacturing, etc. 1V o "-t b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. /v v c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List 'other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Now 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals., risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. %I O 1)•Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? V1 0 rJE 19'.,4'Vt:F AfJQ M A'(- . N dr G I+POC Vc-6 J C.. 6 U k• 1. S . 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. I ,. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: W o^I)F 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? R&S i��:F niT/ r9 L b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. 91A-N�Cl FII)Ml�q bW6LLINC) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Nv e. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? P( / i) C--7V-Fr it L h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? IIf so, specify. Vt;-S, Tl4c tNTIZE Ae,:Ftt )Vi Td STEP SLO-e -5 i..Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? S j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0) o fTt' k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NoNk5- 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: . JJorut 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. UmiT — HlCalq b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ON C c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Norjt 10'.. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? < ASOV6 xiS-rINcl 6F-AD6 c45- f c/vD/PJC-1 PGV-rA1'T (4PPLici0r7l0/\J b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nara c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N0Nt 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Nw- b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? �b c. What existing off -site sources -of light or glare may affect your proposal? NoaI; d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Nal,ri✓ 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. )VO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: nl a 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation . a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. / �( O b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NOntc= c.. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed acces/s� to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. V I aLJLA N0 k) AY b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? p I �1 z) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 14 ON d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). M e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �l o f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate.when peak volumes would occur. gcgm g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Jai a nr C 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N0 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. J\/0/vt 16. Utilities �� a. ircle util' curren;,i vailable the site: a c4? trici y, n tural s, a ter refu i e, t lephon san' ary s wer, septi em, other. A -61- F T b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. /VO hDD/T/OAI`AC V T I L I T I tF5 PE©U"t O C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete Jo the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead age is relying o them o make its decision. Signature n ,. ..............J..��--------•------------- Date Submitted: ... Q / .J`.O /9 0 D. Supplemental.Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Rezones, Code Changes, Annexations, etc.) -- Do not use this sheet for project actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? 140 A F C C T Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: as nre 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No AFFECT Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: " ^J l 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 140 P'l C- 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat; historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? &l o RFF�ci Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Now 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? NO A r%C T Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: /Je'J)r 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No A r-f,6CT Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: �a/JC 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No a ENVCHK3/PFORMS ..r rfK�.'els'r�t'<sT.:Y.i'r'••�ti�a.`If �.•}t; '°' r fi'�ira% 4% Pay-�i::'V+ �h7'.�s 4.;.Ar• "! r ra;. d.r'j"a�s - •,r;J: �c �:�,`��.;^v;.« �'-.'.-in �a�%"2�;;.+ t, �`r-� v� 4ti. `^:.'g "y��; rrH'x "}'.r �.io'.�, of ,'"i:�•, j,l::e;1.,s,.ii:w,{is�a,-:•;iy',. i +vs9 W Z 0 W F- U W O w CITY OF EDMONDS . • �°�•• , �.,-, Permit No. ��- 16 / COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT-,,7� � z'� � RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 3� °T FIL Issue Date S% A. • Owner: �� �`� �, tJ T e- B. • Contractor: 5 SQ-7, Name Name Mailing Address ailin Address City State Zip City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1 < _Z�l k" VZ10— Type of Work to be Done: t' D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat �k Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y ❑ N F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this, application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries; damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, 'forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including .or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs,' court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. . • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt.or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: ���� �� \+� � Date'. `6. _ �l 4 2- Owner or Contractor. This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: /.F'--7/►'' / l �i1 Time Authorized: Void after days Special Conditions: PERMIT FEE: 03o. 00 Restoration Fee: Receipt No.:_ Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY: Date �� r INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE 1 Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: FINAL APPROVAL BY: ❑ YES ❑ NO Date: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 . ,.r . . ,� ,� 1'"' ,,�,.r� y"�..,.,.� � r4 �.,a `.�e � �Y +.`�V---'r-TL ""�,�t'�+N,�,,?fah'j�'oa.nr-4'ran^r+'y��✓'�5-rt�,n.,,rd'�.•i�1v Z.(�,.ah�; ali-w vrw ��N��r,i.M: j1��,+r: dYl,wOF EDMONDS COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit No. — � .5 CL Issue Date A IR R' A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Co B. • Contractor: Same Na e 80T 156 AV NE Name hVIiI6 NgressWA 9 8 0 0 7 Mailing Address City State Zip City State Zip 447-0700 State License Number Telephone Number • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 12.34 Viewland Vey /1q Type of Work to be Done,i' .New gas s'errviee installation Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects F., ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ® Utility Q Pavement Cut: ❑ Y ❑ N U A. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN a Q INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense Wof any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. .a THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP. AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE �__YEAR_EOLLO ING THE=FINAL�-INSRECTION-AND=AC.CE°P�TAh10E='OF=-ThI.E=WORK:.-`'r-�'=``. O. U Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch iscompleted by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Public Works: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; no exceptions. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: 9/ 2 9/ 8 8 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must Be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -DIG Prior To Beginning Work W Z O W E� U ix O ISSUED BY: v 3 �% Time Authorized: Void after days. Special Conditions: Amendments: PERMIT FEE: �O : f_" Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: X = _ NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. July 1985 r N � FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund III - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY:. Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 CITY OF EDMONDS ASSET INFORMATION SHEET I✓� NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION � / ` � / M I D�N�O. * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST *PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. 3�z gad r, ESTIMATED LIFE o�� INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY **SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY rJ DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE INITIAL b P A DEPARTMENT FILE 1?-� VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. PRa:n= REV.LEW CHOCKLIST PFD= NAME: /F PROJECT ADDRESS: : 4PPi.iCATIQN REICEIPT HATE: ^' Reviewed by: (initiaJ date) Comm PLANNING 4TIR/SWR STREET ENGNRNG - FIRE BUILDING 3nXMZ FAKMY/MULTSPLE/CO2,=IAI, — (Circle.0ne) 3EZ'c5 CHECKED -- PlAnn ing / / / / f / l 1 / VARIANCE/Si:TRACK AW. "" ////////J frf1t111 ///llll!!/ t ! 1// /// l //lJl1T `ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT //!!// ///////// //////// ////1111// 2 TB Rk=RR*ffUM CHECKED 1 1/ / /J 11/1 XHtM ZONING REQUIREMENTS //!l!! /l////!/f If//!/// //l////!1l 4 M777 11111 111 1/ll/// WWRONMENTAL, FMURES !_ rldrl /!////_!/! If//I/// 5 NCC-E5S SLOPE & VEHICLE ACCESS r1//////! //f////// ff///l//A 6 / // PLAN (�, Site) 7 1117111 arrt lx EIL: ////! ItI11J//r fJffld/df ///11lft 8 rMAL DISCRIPTICN VFMF:rCATlCN, All ////jj 111771111777771777/! V I 11 I :. .. �JIT UAIM/DEDICATIONS ,�% " /r//.% //1//JId/ - /1//I//11 - ////ill/ 10 �: x A..: .ma's, k{ _. FAST° — PUAL.IC/PRIVATE ,?(r-'. • %/%!//I// //!//!1t/ %//l// A C w� 1 .'.PT ATE SEWER CONNECTION IF NO I.YD# .. � ' !/11/f 1/1flfJ/! /!/1l///I !//llil! "� 12 _ / 1 / l lii i PrAmisuaDlvrSlcxt REQUIREMENTSfrill% /1Jdf1f1! /11r/fl/ 13 ,CG7TP--OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REO7 14 _ / 1111111_ 1 1 1 /! / J tf :30ND REQD FOR PUBLIC IMPROVE24ENTS f1f/ ! ll/////// /r///1/lI 1/!///// 15 30ILS DONDZTIMIS & GROUND SAYER FIETD CifEMED lJlfld 1/rfJ//// ////J///! d1t/ // 16 111117 IF111177 777777777 Irr r PAVING REXXIIRED ////// ///////// ///////// 17 %! 1 7111117TI/ 11117TIT11 AW AND GUTTER REQUIRED 7 /CT% 'IDEWALX REQUIRED/I/ d/ r/fl/////r777W /!///r 19 ! / 111111Tff/ / ! MM CUT FOR DR3VEWAY READ l/flll I/ /^1 /t!/I/rrd r////r///r 117 20 - — >rlr NAME SIGN RFD '' 1 ! ! !//l////1 ///////// 21 / !7171111711 MrER_SIGNING READ 7 22 ?DE: S WER AVAILABILITY !///!I /fl///fd! /!//!//rd /lf///// 23 OCISTING WATER MAIN SIZE ///1!f !f//IJ/!/ �a , drflt/// r///Ilfr/1 24 r - / ! ,, Itrt /f/! !f g1TE:R METER SIZE //!/ / 1//////// 1Jf/II// /////1!/// 25 �� 71711 ,E2VICE LINE SIZE /!!!! 1�//// �`� //////// ////� 26 rYDRANP REQUIRED ////'///// /////1/// 1tI///// ////////// 27 IYDRANP SIZE EXISTING //lffl ///////// �_ //////// /////////! 2R_ 717777 / f� `ROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION REQD //r!l! !//////// //////// ////////// 29 1777717171 1 ---17121 /1/lam ATM MIER CJWCE READ ////// %//////// //////// ////////// 30 FIRE LINE CHARGE REQD — SPRINKLER ! /l//1/./ ///.////l ////////_// 31 3TREEr CUT //////. rJJl/1/e/ ///////1// 32 )PEN DITCH EXISTING /f//f/ M111117- f/f/fl/// !1/f/l/f/ 33 "ff/Ir/,= REXZD /////1 ll 34 RED 1d!/Ir /Jlftfrlt ft!/11/!I 35 SIZE 1/ :!AATCH BASIN REQD 1/1!// //!I///// !////f/f/ 37 SH9ULDER DRAINAGE MAINTAIN 177711777 1 ! 1 OPM RUNOFF d/ //I1//I// /!////1/J 39 /ei//i/// //r/r 40 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) CX iC, _S(A MAILING ADDRESS S rtwr W _-� SfReef- CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER FT J e4{erso,J , IVY 11-1-77 (ifsZZ I 11L i v V I ' CITY 11 , ITELEPHONE NAME ¢ ADDRESS O U FCITY TELEPHONE NUMBER z O U STATE LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property - Include all easements (show below or attach four copies) USE PERMIT ZONE ^5_/ 2- NUMBER JOB ADDRESS 1Z 3,41 Ye�✓/,�Wd _EGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID N0. Lor #maz, V Ect/ TESCP PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. APPROVED BY EXISTING - REQUIRED DEDICATIONO _ PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED t1 REVIEW BY SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED 470 METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS 21 REMARKS ,PRv �eQa SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB N0. ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT I I RHf1F1 FI INF a 3 NU Lot � (ky V/ I, ; � V (,thj�- I in11� VARIANCE OR CU P��(NG REVIEW BY 0 TE 0 ��' 1�.� a lJ YARDS / / FRONT SIDE ID REAR 25 HEIGHT � LOT COVERAGE Z z ��d Z J & ` REMARKS r g %NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ElADD/ALTER a COMMERCIAL� MECHANICAL n REPAIR RETAINING WALL LJ SIGN Q FENCE NCE x-� DEMOLISH � OR FILL DEMOLISH PRE-MOVE INSP.I a SWIM REMODEL COMPLIANCE INSP. POOL CHECKED BY TYPE OF COwN/STRUCTION E CODG HEIGHT 7 SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED YES ONO AREA OCCUPANCY GROUP P 2 OCCUPANT LOAD WOOD NSERTVE/ APT. BLDG RENEWAL R MARKS ' PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 c o a f.(AJ/3L ?WraL 10IF'ot IMW 014 F/✓4596y 9foIbE m w NUMBER OF STORIES o m NUMBER OF DWELLING I UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) S/ic Re5lo4.16e PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days ENERGY CODE Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Wort is Started Within 180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and N successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, Its officials, f employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT, ,whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to ----[Gi�iX% 0 modify,.waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance Ox nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." b k 1 d h t 1 h d thl H tl th t th I here y ac now a ge I. a ova rea s Opp ca on, a e information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT t This application is not a permit until on state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES Is ed thereby, no pWon will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THEY signedis b the n Official his 9 Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is ti n Insurance.. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATURE OWNER ORDATE SIGN D DEPARTMENT AGENT) CITY OF OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE V� EDMONDS ATTENTION 771-3202 RELEASED BY: DATE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE �� UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC /,, CHAPTER 3. v l 'PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 102-8T .'Building TO: Division M. Engineering Division ",.S,UBJECT: tt3'. After +1, ki t building permit application, we have the .review V C aw ec ingcomnaents: bhnection to City water system required. onnection to City sanitary sewer system required. R -of-way permit required for any work.on City property. N. Driveway slope not to exceed 141%. 5),; Bac k water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below :'.elevation of upstr eam ream manhole. a ter and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. Ider/owner responsible for containing all temporary, runoff and erosion on s i te and may not impact neighboring properties. in any W;% V 8 Construction hours from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 a.im. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. No burning *of construction refuge -wit_-hnuj-_, -en by Fire Dept. I , - It rA r� _CITY of EDMONDS S• SE':WE'R 11R•MIT (i�_. ;; 00 _o a, N For Inspection Call• 771-3202 PERMIT•NO. .'07967 Address of Construction. �� E!%� �� 4.� Property'Legal Description (Include all easements,.):" Owner and/or Builder: Iftrev- r000z S Contractor & License No: 10414CPi %SD KW Si ngl:e Family Residence V" 5w/, "."'90L Multi - Family Commercial (No. of Units ). ONDS LTREEATMENT PLANT, (No. 'of fixture Units RLE Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No �� Yes (If Yes,.Right-of-Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS.LISTED ON THE BACK 0 RECEIVED DEC 2 I dertify that I have read and shall comply Date ' with the items listed on the back. PUBl16 WORKS Permit Fee: -72, 0• OD k Trunk Charge: Assessment Fee: I Partial Inspection: Comments Final Inspection Approved: Rejected: )\(D lw_sgt Pj, eason Date �E&'X r, Issued By: Date Issued: Receipt No.: Date Initial Initial Date Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED OIV JOB SITE ** White Copy - File Green Copy --Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO------------------------------------------Y. NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS �� LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO. -------------- ._'. OWNER--------------------------------------------------\----------••------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR----...--•-------------------•-•-•--•-----------.....------------------------------- PERMIT NO.07-� - � JOB ADDRESS -!-----V--IEW lW ---- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO... BLOCK NO. -••-•..............•-------------------------------------•----.........-------------------.-...-....------------•-•------...-----------------•------- NAME OF ADDITION ----------•-------•------------------------------ EDP:10NDS ----------------------- TREATMENT-�'tflP1-T:- -- Q K) t.J Sw`w• �bb` V\b0�4� - �'�yS' b�L- �`dl �0� i �=t�� V T�Z,rWe-> ! PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) bv� Leo-r-'L, kz1 Ali Approved: DATE}--------- BY----------•-•--•--•-••-•--•--------•-------••------••------. 00 0 r Qi N a� CITY of EDMONDS RECEIVED S[DE. ST. For Inspection Call 771-3202 -PERMIT'--.NO. • 07878 Address of Construction:. Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and'/or Builder:(<j e Contractor & License No: l�,�A��$Thl Cc`�iSTKLt-<rtly�'' W��SIfC �Z54r Single Family Residence �_ 7� CJCX/ 66 Multi -Family (No. of Units. ) EDMONDS LAN T{�EATMENT P. Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call,One-Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes,.easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK-nf FILE 7 /Y. 8G I cer i tha I have read and shall comply Date with the items listed on the back. . Permit Fee: .00 4Iss,ued By: Trunk Charge: 2s.00 iDate Issued: 7 26 92? Assessment Fee: 'Receipt No.: `9O2& Partial Inspection:. Comments Final Inspection Approved: Da to nitia1 Date, Initial Rejected: Reason Date Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** Wh.ite Copy File. Green Copy -'Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant < Side Sewer Drawing r The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO- -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION [. REPAIRS ❑ LID NO- ------------------ -ASMT. NO. -------------- OWNER.------•----...--••-•------...-•----•--•-------••---...----•-•-•-------------------------------- CONTRACTOR ------------------ PERMIT NO. C7�-.O_ �g JOB ADDRESS ..�. �4 I E-14�1t� N4` 1--------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ----•-- ---------------------------- BLOCK NO.-------•-------•-•----•--•--•-•---- ------------------------------------------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------ EDMONDS ---- - - --------- TREATMENT PLANT �Q O v � 1 Z i 0 �,� o Tb I fl to r� 0 Approvia: PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE .._ .�_�__. g...l. y B�. - ---- \ V I �v.t �. �K� \14 A, u � � F i 1 1 �7 STRUT FILE �,34 Y 1,P.WIA 4 "_y DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology 206/788-5612 13424 Chain Lake Road Monroe, Washington 98272 206/794-4332 June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Folke Nyberg Architect 2265 North 56th Street Seattle, Washington 98103 Reference: Geotechnical Evaluation Partch Residence 1234 Viewland Way Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen; WE V-1VED, JUL 1 21988 PERMIT COUNTER T c` FILE This is to serve as a report of geotechnical exploration and evaluation services performed within the above referenced project site, as requested by you. Introduction The purpose of this evaluation is to present our findings, opinions, conclusions and recommendations for development within the site as proposed. We understand that construction is to consist of a residential dwelling, with associated amenities, such as a swimming pool. The approximate location of the residence and pool is shown on the enclosed location map. ' The scope of services included performance of three (3) backhoe test pits around the site area, and visual observation around the general site. The locations of the test pits are approximately shown on the enclosed location map. ' All elevations mentioned in this report refer to existing grade, and to topographic information and site layout, as shown on a plot plan of the site area. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology ' June 28 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 2 Location & Site Description The .investigated site consists of a residential lot located at 1234 Viewland Way, in Edmonds, Washington. Presently, the site area is undeveloped but occurs within an existing residential development. Topographically, the site is relatively gently sloping toward the west within the proposed residence area. The site was apparently near the crest of a ridge at one time, and has since been excavated to the existing condition. Soils Conditions The subsurface soils stratigraphy can best be seen on the enclosed test pit logs. In general, the site was found to be underlain by dense glacial till. The subsurface soils were found to consist of grey -brown to grey, dense to very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel, considered glacial till. These materials were encountered in all test pits performed across the site area, and is also expected to underly the entire site area. These dense basal soils were found to occur about 0.3 to 0.5 feet below grade. The residual surficial soils (0.3 to 0.5 feet thick) were found to consist of topsoil-, sod, roots and scattered artificial fill. Hydrologic Conditions The ground water table was not encountered in any of the test pits performed within the site area. Some evidence of surficial perched water was apparent, above the very dense basal glacial till, as seasonal surface drainage. This condition is common within glacial till areas, where the surface water does not readily penetrate the dense soils, and flows laterally along the surface soil/glacial till interface. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES INC. Consulting Engineering Geology ' June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 3 Conclusions/Opinions Based upon the explorations and observations performed, we are of the opinion that development as proposed within the site area can be performed, provided that recommendations as presented herein.are utilized for construction. In general, residence foundations should be placed into the dense glacial ' soils, adequate drainage should be provided around the structure and pool areas. Any fill should consist of structural fill. Recommendations ' We suggest all foundations be placed at least 12 inches into the dense basal glacial till, where a net allowable soil bearing pressure.of 6000 pounds per ' square foot (psf) is available. Conventional spread or continuous type footings could be used, and should be covered with at least 18 inches of soil ' as to be below frost level. Pool area development is proposed on the south side of the structure. We suggest the pool be founded into the dense basal glacial till, with a bed of ' freely draining aggregate for drainage proposes. Subsequent to pool area excavation, a basal drainage blanket consisting of at least 12 inches of washed aggregate should be placed beneath the pool area. A drain should be installed within this drainage blanket to allow gravity.drainage out of the area. This drain could be connected to the main drainage system, or independently daylight downslope. Structural fill should consist of granular, pit -run type soils, placed in 6 to 8 inch lifts and compacted to 95% of ASTM D-1557, modified proctor. All structural fill should be adequately retained using appropriately designed retaining walls, or backsloped to slopes no steeper than 2H:1V, and adequately protected from erosion. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES INC. Consulting Engineering Geology June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 4 Should retaining walls be anticipated, we suggest they consist of adequately designed concrete walls, founded into the dense basal glacial till. Lateral pressures against the wall of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for cantilever walls, and 50 pcf for restrained walls should be used for design..purposes where the ground behind the wall is well drained and there are no surcharges. A drainage system, consisting of at least 18 inches.of freely draining aggregate placed full height of the wall and connected to a basal perforated pipe drain, should be utilized for all retaining walls. The surface of the drainage area behind the wall should be capped with on -site native soils, and backsloped away from the wall area. Resistance to sliding for retaining walls ' should utilize a base coefficient of friction of 0.4 within the glacial till. Adequate drainage should be provided around the site area. We suggest the use of foundation and roof drain systems, independently directed into the main drainage system, or properly daylighted downslope. The pool area and ' retaining wall area drains could be connected to the main drainage system, which is directed downslope away from the structure.area. Protection of the ' drainage outfall area, or connection to downslope drainage systems should be anticipated to reduce any potential for erosion of the slope area. Site grading should also be performed, so that accumulated surface waters are directed into the main drainage system. Additional Notes ' Inspection of the earthwork phase of development should be performed. This should include foundation excavation and placement, structural filling and i drainage development. Although we do expect site soil types, conditions and distributions to reflect ' our findings, some variations could occur. Should conditions other than those discussed herein be encountered, the geotechnical consultant should be IL DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 5 notified for review and comment. Additional or alternative recommendations may be required. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, feel free to call on us at any time. Sincerely, ZDAV . NELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. David L. Nelson, PG Professional Engineering Geologist iJ��� . Keith Cross, PE Geotechnical Engineering Consultant to David L. Nelson & Associates, Inc. DLN:kmn •"" KEITH -'•% uisuiLN m why C: L�GAT(01� IM N? 3 TEsr Plrs Q Aj DAVID L. NELS ; SSOCIATES, INC. Consultin aing Geology 206/788.5612 13424 Chain Lake Road • =_atA 98272 206/794 4332 Y�4RTGH IIESiDE�t7CE fa-q !//EKXA�D 4.s?i; �QIYIONDSr�tIAfM• r SCALE f" �! PROD. NO. DATE L ®! SHEET **—/ TEST PIT LOGS TP-1 0-0.3 Topsoil & roots 0.3-3.0 Grey very dense poorly sorted silty sand with gravel (glacial till) TP-2 0-0.5 Topsoil/FILL 0.5-4.0 Grey -brown to grey, dense to very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel .(glacial till) TP-3 0-0.3 Topsoil & roots 0.34.V Gery-brown to grey, very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel (glacial till) DAVID L. NELS AND. SSOCIATES, INC. Consulting- eq��g Geology206/788-5612 13424 Chain Lake Road •=kfintste _A 98272 - 206/794.4332 Partch Residence 1234 Viewland Way; Edmonds, Wa. SCALE — PROJ. NO. 7088 DATE 6/14/88 SHEET 1 of 1 �133t11S 1e13Y' �ieW�(� �Jqy DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology 206/788-5612 13424 Chain Lake Road Monroe, Washington 98272 206/794-4332 tow June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Folke.Nyberg Architect 2265 North 56th Street Seattle, Washington 98103 Reference: Geotechnical Evaluation Partch Residence 1234 Viewland Way Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen; This is to serve as a report of geotechnical exploration and evaluation services performed within the above referenced project site, as requested by you. Introduction The purpose of this evaluation is to present our findings, opinions, conclusions and recommendations for development within the site as proposed. We understand that construction is to consist of a residential dwelling, with associated amenities, such as a swimming pool. The approximate location of the residence and pool is shown on the enclosed location map. The scope of services included performance of three (3) backhoe test pits around the site area, and visual observation around the general site. The locationsof the test pits are approximately shown on the enclosed location map• All elevations mentioned in this report refer to existing grade, and to topographic information and site layout, as shown on a plot plan of the site area. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineering Geology June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 2 Location & Site Description The investigated site consists of a residential lot located at 1234 Viewland Way, in Edmonds, Washington. Presently, the site area is undeveloped but occurs within an existing residential development. Topographically, the site is relatively gently sloping toward the west within the proposed residence area. The site was apparently near the crest of a ridge at one time, and has since been excavated to the existing condition. Soils Conditions The subsurface soils stratigraphy can best be seen on the enclosed test pit logs. In general, the site was found to be underlain by dense glacial till. The b su surface soils were found to consist of grey -brown to re dense to 9 Y grey, very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel, considered glacial till. These materials were encountered in all test pits performed across the site area, and is also expected to underly the entire site area. These dense basal soils were found to occur about 0.3 to 0.5 feet below grade. The residual surficial soils (0.3 to 0.5 feet thick) were found to consist of topsoil, sod, roots and scattered artificial fill. Hydrologic Conditions The ground water table was not encountered in any of the test pits performed within the site area. Some evidence of surficial perched water was apparent, above the very dense basal glacial till, as seasonal surface drainage. This i� condition is common within glacial till areas, where the surface water does not readily penetrate the dense soils, and flows laterally along the surface soil/glacial till interface. DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Consulting Engineering Geology June 28,' 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 3 Conclusions/Opinions Based upon the explorations and observations performed, we are of the opinion that development as proposed within the site area can be performed, provided i that recommendations as presented herein.are utilized for construction. In general, residence foundations should be placed into the dense glacial soils, adequate drainage should be provided around the structure and pool q 9 P areas. Any fill should consist of structural fill. Recommendations OJ We suggest all foundations be placed at least 12 inches into the dense basal glacial till, where a net allowable soil bearing pressure.of 6000 pounds per square foot (psf) is available. Conventional spread or continuous type footings could be used, and should be covered with at least 18 inches of soil as to be below frost level. Pool area development is proposed on the south side of the structure. We suggest the pool be founded into the dense basal glacial till, with a bed of freely draining aggregate for drainage proposes. Subsequent to pool area excavation, a basal drainage blanket consisting of at least 12 inches of washed aggregate should be placed beneath the pool area. A drain should be installed within this drainage blanket to allow gravity.drainage out of the area. This drain could be connected to the main drainage system, or independently daylight downslope. Structural fill should consist of granular, pit -run type soils, placed in 6 to 8 inch lifts and compacted to 95% of ASTM D-1557, modified proctor. All structural fill should be adequately retained using appropriately designed retaining walls, or backsloped to slopes no steeper than 2H:1V, and adequately protected from erosion. J DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. t` Consulting Engineering Geology June 28, 1988 Project No. 7088 Page 4 Should retaining walls be anticipated, we suggest they consist of ade quately designed concrete walls, founded into the dense basal glacial till. Lateral pressures against the wall of 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for cantilever walls, and 50 pcf for restrained walls should be used for design..purposes where the ground behind the wall is well drained and there are no surcharges. A drainage system, consisting of at least 18 inches.,of freely draining I�aggregate placed full height of the wall and connected to a basal perforated pipe drain, should be utilized for all retaining walls. The surface of the drainage area behind the wall should be capped with on -site native soils, and backsloped away from the wall area. Resistance.to sliding for retaining walls should utilize a base coefficient of friction of 0.4 within the glacial till. Adequate drainage should be.provided around the.site area. We suggest the use of foundation and roof drain systems, independently directed into the main drainage system, or properly daylighted downslope. The pool area and retaining wall area drains could be connected to the main drainage system, which is directed downslope away from the structure area. Protection of the drainage outfall area, or connection to downslope drainage systems should be anticipated to reduce any potential for erosion of the slope area. Site grading should also be performed, so that accumulated surface waters are directed into the main drainage system. Additional Notes Inspection of the earthwork phase of development should be performed This should include foundation excavation and placement, structural filling and drainage development. Although we do expect site soil types, conditions and distributions to reflect our findings, some variations could occur. Should conditions other than those discussed herein be encountered, the geotechnical consultant should be _ DAVID L. NELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. t Consulting Engineering Geology June 28, 1988 . Project No. 7088 Page 5 notified for review and comment. Additional or alternative recommendations may be required. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, feel free to call on us at any time. Sincerely, DAV NELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. David L. Nelson, PG Professional Engineering Geologist •••� I �EiTH C9ti• J. Keith Cross, PE i Geotechnical Engineering Consultant to S David L. Nelson & Associates, Inc. •••,��: D L N : kmn •••._'Al E •'• ucEw(hfuD why Llocm-(Ol� PAN? 3 Tesr PETS In 0 DAVID L. NELS04,4bhSSOCIATES, INC. Consultin fA gGeology 206/7S&56i2 13474 Chain Lake Road 98272 • 2061794-4332 54)MH /IEsfDE�t7CE IU-q (/fEf(XA�D 6u?r; �°Q�14ONDS,KJA • SCALE PROD. NO. 0� DATE Z 6Q SHEET J*~/ IEF TEST PIT LOGS TP-1 0-0.3 Topsoil & roots 0.3-3.0 Grey very dense poorly sorted silty sand with gravel (glacial till) TP-2 0-0.5 Topsoil/.FILL 0.5-4.0 Grey -brown to grey, dense to very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel (glacial till) TP-3 0-0.3 Topsoil & roots 0.3-6.0 Gery-brown to grey,.very dense, poorly sorted silty sand with gravel (glacial till) DAVID L. NELSQ.'A l SSOCIATES, INC. Consulting' e3C= Geology206/788.5612 13424 Chain Lake Road 59Xcrtto"A 98272 2061794 4332 Partch Residence 1234 Viewland Way; Edmonds, Waa. .SCALE — PROJ. NO. 7088 DATE 6/14/88 SHEET .1 Of 1 RK1 W y C V I Q P '4 E \\\ ,L4 K%q •/ - � .._^. J P... Cow-_. WI'7• j` co's� .� tPJ4 _ _ _ _i� + ` ,�,`J`. � • �' Ni� 3�� � Gy,� GTE ` �, � 3 Ike 9 70 4 3R 123y VjI: iJLR nl IJA 1 VF' j :3R 4 — f4LL S-rPWC-r\J2` S Ex6Ti.Jc� '''; ti �"-�•�;�.t�'��Fc. � ------ — ONLY F In►i5�� Co(1�1011JC1 UOD;R. i,R�vrwAY •,• %, � J o rpT_. � �,: �� -----.. -- ...,..,..---........ . ... ......_. , ?; � Co � J SAP 8 o-t•pEQ�.l�sc N � y ! UNBUILT t O i � I ii �oPOF arUJowtl DEL, �fFG i W .. i Wi I • :� • --�=�. �j'�4-G.O ' �A (PROPOSED ` 3�`F'y �. \ �( �k I !Z'-o" �► WALL GON-riovoos Rcotic) PRoAfR-r f e -sy c �, o, \ I (t rr. lei»T �.I►Hl .. j �•. ToP ORS � � /� • '�?; \�' �' � � .WAIL �L I rrp 'L El-5441 ag'� d 4 I Ex i srl N c� � i c SPECIAL CONDITIONS: LOCATION OF WORK. - OWNER:, ARCHITECT: STRUCTURAL: 8 L/ , Washington 1234 V16W1_WNr,).UJ1 Y Folke Nyberg Seattle, Washington Edgar A. Lebert P.E. 18718 56th Avenue Northeast Seattle, Washington 98155 SCOPE OF WORK: Cantilever Wall Construction of Reinforced Concrete Unit Masonry and supported by a reinforced concrete footing tied into a slab on grade driveway. Take precautions necessary to protect adjoining structure and property from excessive drainage or debris. The contractor shall provide an adequate system for the handling and removal of surface water. STRUCTURAL: STRUCTURAL DESIGN CODE: Design is in accordance with the 1988 edition of the Uniform Building Code. (1988 UBC) DESIGN LIVE LOADS Equivalent Fluid Pressure X psf lateral active pressure. Lateral Fluid Pressure is carried by bending of vertical reinforced masonry (R/M) wall to cantilever wall footing at the base of the wall, which is cast integrally with a slab on grade driveway. FOUNDATION: Footings shall bear on firm undisturbed earth of 2000 psf minimum bearing capacity at a minimum depth below adjacent grade of l'-6". Compacted fill shall be clean, free -draining, granular material compacted.in shallow lifts of 8 inches maximum height. Backfill behind all foundation walls with clean, well - draining, granular fill material —and provide for subsurface drainage using perforated drainage pipe wrapped in filter cloth and placed in shallow trenches with crushed rock or pea -gravel to promote drainage in a manner satisfactory for the' local building department. Weep Holes at no further than 4 feet on center may also be used at the base of the concrete block wall to carry water from free draining backfill wrapped in filter cloth. Concrete footings to be poured monolithically unless shown otherwise or approved prior to placement. CONCRETE: ti , fc'= 2500 psi - minimum compression strength at 28 days. Fc = 844 psi - allowable compression stress Uninspected Construction. (75% of .45 (fc') Ec = 2,850,000 psi - Concrete Modulus of Elasticity n = 10.178 - modular ratio = Ec/Es The selection of materials for the mixing and placing of all concrete shall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, 1988 Edition. Materials shall be proportioned to produce a dense, workable mix having a maximum slump of 4 inches, which can be placed without segregation or excess free- surface water. All concrete shall be mixed to have a minimum compressive strength at 28 days of 2500 psi in compression, with a minimum of 5-1/2 sacks of Type I Portland Cement per cubic yard of concrete. All concrete shall contain MBVR Air Entraining Agent to produce 4 to 6 percent entrained air in the concrete. Maximum size of aggregate is 1 inch for foundation concrete, and slabs on grade. Absolute water -cement ratio by weight shall not exceed 0.40. For exposed concrete in slabs on grade, and foundation walls, the total volume of free available water per cubic' yard of concrete shall not exceed 270 pounds. Provide plain and reinforced concrete footings, foundations, slabs -on -grade and all other concrete incidental to a complete job. MATERIALS: All concrete work to use Portland Cement, Type I, conforming to ASTM C-150 CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY: Design stresses have been adjusted to permit noncontinuous inspection per UBC 306(a). fm'= 1500 psi x 50% = 750 psi design ultimate compression strength at 28 days for concrete unit masonry. Fm = 250 psi - allowable compression stress in bending Noncontinuous Construction. (.33 fm') Em = 1,125,000 psi - Concrete Unit.Masonry Modulus of Elasticity ( 750 fm') n = 25.78 - modular ratio = Em/Es MORTAR: Type S mortar whose proportions are described in Table 24-A of the 88 UBC shall have a workable, plastic consistency in cementing the concrete masonry units. GROUT: Fine or Coarse Grout proportions are described in Table 24-B of the 88 UBC and shall flow without segregation of the constituents and have a minimum compressive strength of at least 2000 psi at 28 days. REINFORCING STEEL: , All reinforcing steel shall be deformed steel bars manufactured in accordance with ASTM specification A615, of Grade 60 steel. Fy = 60,000 psi minimum yield stress Fs = 18,000 psi maximum allowable tensile stress. Uninspected Construction = 75% (24,000 psi) Minimum lap distance for all #4 bars shall be V -8". Reinforcing Steel Protection shall be as follows except as shown on drawings: Footings 3 inches Earth face of walls 2 inches Weather face of walls 2 inches Interior face of walls 2 inches Slabs on Grade 1 inch to 1-1/4 inches to weather In no case shall cover be less than the bar diameter. 95-71 _ //0 2 pt Mg 1457 140 : g5"Z S. - !, 9 qs5 (d e !so:/ are Lo�C•� . 4 k i- Ia,.�c l l PO Z� VC o ------_- o� y A �a r�'�5 • 3' o'` o� o LAJ al i E Al( re ('11 farc, C, VK m -a �t 12551 ONAL I ---� � ��. �- �. f � � ! i ffr .. _ � _ t � - -Ell' 'I»I[ a.Y 113 11 H; Il Jf 11111 A�•• 131410 1 1 "1" 'SII Ii "ll !- �. ...._..... d' .. "Y _- -- _ _-- __ _ - '---iMSi`•'dif�T+i !_'ib"y.�:e....... CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORK ADDRESS OWNER 'APPROVED DATE: PLDG, OFFICIAL PERMIT NUMBER ZONE SETBACKS' ONT SIDE REAR OTHER __.,...... HEIGHT QER�11t. CO�NtER CITY COPY