Loading...
1246 VIEWLAND WAY.PDF11111111111111 13565 1246 VIEWLAND WAY PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FILE Name: ,,Date: u Site Address: 115 G Tax Parcel: Project Description: Neco S41t Pk deed �arsy��. Plan Check #: %—DJ0130005 Reduced Site Plan Provided: ES / NO) Zoning: _ Map Page: Corner Lot: (YES / NO Flag Lot: (YES NO Critical Areas Determination #: r RAX9gyo12G .. .� Study Required.- La„ dsVde. 4 &csloe Amu% - Ste- cANOb gas-ed on 10twis. Ap �� S"6"Acj eper� 67 ❑ Waiver SEPA Determination: Exet, Exempt ❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Required Setbacks Street: Side: O, Side:�s 10 S�dc Rear: E S� Actual Setbacks W-i-o pro vocal Street: , Side: , S d, 4,-[Side�s , s�d�: , t0 0 Rear. . �E J9 Detached Structures: Pe-cpoem-d deed :nd;c,,% -cd e., sake_ �z•,. ❑ Rockeries: ❑ Fences/Trellises: Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: ❑ Stairs Deck: Buildin Hei ht Datum Point: Go^`�`^Y 1'"' °^ 11,ocar— Datum Elevation: ,+3 E s;de- oP Maximum Height Allowed: 15 3G Actual Height: Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: 4. Lot Area: Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: 3�,2 Lot Coverage Calculations: � A 4 G"S�d:y90 � ADU Created: (YES NO Subdivision: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / NO Comments �1'No}t: PGr EGi7G1fo.�O.OSO,C� }1,tnor«,a11r rt��;re.d rear xk%a.ck r+.�7 b�rr��•e.c-0( �o ,.,;.,,�,K,,, of s for sacessl�rr bk:td;,,� eover;nq less 44.a., Goooff' A c, spa.- . A .aag l :tj 1415' For- U- de"Cd gi1rw�' ;� does 0404.- %:OL* '14% s�,�r s�.r;aa p\,oko-% I'Pron, ?OM 6e ruse^h-, RawlAy RawA va r Plan Review By: Planning Data Form 07-14-09 r City of Edmonds Critical Area Notice of Decision Applicant: Property .Owner: Critical Area File #: Permit Number: Ln a or, cS Site Location: Parcel Number: V' L Project Description: deb LI ❑ Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above. 1. There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. 2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220i 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. 3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. En'nttrn D:v'Slon will :n�per�or Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critic�al�areaand/or a c4 ararea buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:.— 5u- re.pori- br Dtwn;s Ibew-e. d�#�d 14 2DI3. 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23!40.120, Mitigation sequencing; 12. The proposal does -not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health,. safety, or welfare . on or off the development proposal site; 3.. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC .23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values. consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached fmdings of noncompliance. Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). C64.}:omcd 4u -Pallma of e.o4" rcpoe'� d-y 0 i%�s Sr+xe.*- d gam• IT, 7.013, . Reviewer lohA3' Date Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal -procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. Revised 1211612010 (dry of edmonds) � m 2o�a. to CL>bib a� c Viewlan>pp tG, Q "C1 tV 41 O Rf 00 atioo./ has rb0.•�o cr �.:. Q ILI O as Lz 4 N 89 14 38 W 108.69' 45'-9" J ^ building line - A 10'-11/2' Note: N n All eaves are 24" or less U.N.O.. N to m - ave line nFCK > 30" above o grade HnUsF AND GARAGE 289 sf 4,088.66 sf v � I 10'-4 11a t (garage) N N , datlun = 348.50 23'-11 1/2" (concrete entry IandN \ remove Br1 st or - V v Y . V y existing concrete driveway and replace Pro Po \ 10� wdh pervious concrete PLANNING INFORMATON \ea A. DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACCESSORY STRUCTURE /�J : \ OWNER JUAN and MARTHA SALINAS ` \� -- —' =348 OT----- ------- i......•: PROJECTADDRESS 1246VIEWLAND WAY PARCEL NO. 00 72.9SOO=010 LEGAL HARBOR VIEW ESTATES BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 7 EXISTING ZONING RS -12 CRITICAL FILES NO. CA: 94-126 LOT SIZE 15,710 sf ALLOWED LOT COVERAGE 5,498.5 sf EXISTING BLDG. COVERAGE 4,088.66 sf HOUSE 8 GARAGE DECK 289 sf SHED 96 sf TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE 4,473.66 sf PROPOSED COVERAGE 599 sf TOTAL COVERAGE 5,072.66 sf PROPOSED COVERAGE % 32.29 % HEIGHT CALCULATIONS V A = 348.00' Allowed accessory height = 15.00, 8 = 347.30' Ave = 347.69 C = 347.47' proposed structure = 14.75 D = 348.09 Proposed Height = 362.44' Ave = 347.69, Allowed = 362.69 C73 r C L OCc � � 0 0 - WW — C) a: Q± Q L 7 0- m C to N O C Qi � C oEV-Q) UQ. tZ N OR R N . o � o � iD N 8914 38 W 67.00, z5'-a' setback ed accessory tructure 599 sf t1 8 = 7.30' Note: no trees exist in work area ®. C = 34TAT Site Plan Scale: t" - 20 0 �V JUL 16 2P' A' BUILDING DEPAi CITY OF EDNI<.., Live TJP- --\rta b9mrt fM) 1 yYrRegtllalM C t . F—pl RMW.W 2 Replx 3. ewIPortisw) • 4 •••_,••••- •• •� ••�-•-. T=RePlaledl pen-bu+.trta .IX'rrtli in .000+ 9� TmN'V-\fidP OyEmQryl ilmmwelm MmuawrntSJs4Ms1 6 :: = RePml,aann"tYetafi4Pm - IJ = 811 sf 7. eR.eropamn.nRaPl+anyl.m.fmpau!»lwfranWy"Q, = 811 sf a. ,1mProlwedmneHlnPl"llhrooShC"mmuwulsW.11hehNq"n Osf 4e+elni�oul ?�rJ laus �auevn��ni f ©e1111Ms M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer September 17, 2013 City of Edmonds RESUB c/o Waite Architect 1111,0 2013 email: waitearch@comcast.net STREET FILE gW&pU o FEDRt;OpEPARNDS T CITY O Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations Proposed New Garage— Salinas Property . 1246 Viewland Way, Edmonds City of Edmonds Plan Check No. BLD20130605 This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Salinas property at 1246 Viewland Way, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / architect concerns, as well as City of Edmonds Building Department requirements for critical areas. REFERENCES: • Property Survey and plans by Steve Waite, Architect • City of Edmonds Review Comments dated August 2, 2013 • Site photographs by D. Bruce, P.E. BACKGROUND: The overall Salinas property is.irregular in shape (see property survey) and contains the existing residence. This engineer understands that Mr. Salinas desires to construct a new garage structure in the southeast corner of his property. See plans. City of Edmonds Review Letter points out that a "steep slope" exists adjacent and easterly of the Salinas property. See topographic. map and photographs. Visual evaluation of the existing residence reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress: no foundation cracking, no obvious settlements, or any evidence of erosional:degradation; SOILS FOUNDATIONS SITE.DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION DRAINAGE DESIGN & PERMIT LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 Shoreline; Washington 98155 (206) 546-9217 dbrucepe@gmail.com City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Viewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 2 Currently, a portion of the property where the proposed garage will be constructed contains existing driveway, as well as yard area (see plans). Evaluation of the existing driveway (in the vicinity of the new garage) revealed no evidence of cracking, settlement, or any evidence of erosional degradation. The top -of -slope region is stable, with no evidence of any soil tension cracks. "Steep Slope" (designated as greater than 40%) is heavily vegetated, and contains'mature trees. No evidence of slides, no erosional rutting or any geotechnical distress was.observed. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, two soil test holes were dug by this engineer on August 20, 2013. Both test holes revealed similar sub - grade conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Organics, duff and organic. silt 5" to 32" (bottom of test holes) Increasingly dense Glacial Till. (hardpan) No groundwater was encountered in either of the two test holes. Both test hole walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation; and experience with similar sites in the area, the Salinas property at 1246 Viewland Way, Edmonds, Washington is geotechnicallb approved for the proposed, subject to the following: o . Geotechnical on -site inspections to verify actual foundation layout prior to any concrete placement. Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided. drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer., • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p. c.f. o Geotechnical inspections by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete placement. City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Viewland Way September 1 T 2013 Page 3 The proposed structure can be supported on. conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General, Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement.and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread, footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation. may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete. is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width :of the over -excavation .at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation. extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least. seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term. wind or seismic loads. Forthe above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Viewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing, soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to, placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should .be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath .the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 p.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure. 350 p.c.f. Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Soil Unit Weight 125 p.c.f. Where: (1) . p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed .using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 .times the wall height; a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f_ should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge. slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then'those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Viewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 5 Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite; such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION ARID SLOPES: At the time of this investigation and report, it is understood that maximum excavation depths for the new garage structure will be nominal (less than 24"). As such, no shoring is required. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1 V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and. improve stability of the surficial layer of soil.. City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1:246 Viewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 6 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in either of the two test holes during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow, connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered. with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. NOTE:- Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials. Structural fill is defined as anyfill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas wherethe underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, September 17, 2013 Page 7 1246 Viewland Way lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95%0 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction. is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site. soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations Will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also'besusceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when'the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally; structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic. materials are segregated*and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing Salinas residence or the overall Salinas property. City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Viewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 8 This engineer understands that the new garage structure will incorporate gutters and downspouts, and tightline discharge into the existing storm water system to the west (feeding into Viewland Way right-of-way drainage system). Under no circumstances should any storm water be discharged to the easterly steep slopes. Geotechnical .engineering inspection required.to verify proper storm water control of new garage structure. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. CRITICAL AREAS STEEP SLOPES: This engineer is familiar with City of Edmonds building development codes relating to potential geologically hazardous areas (Chapter 23.80). After.review of the.proposed garage plans, site evaluation, analysis of soil test pit results and extensive experience with similar properties, this engineer recommends that these plans be approved. subject to on -site inspections by this engineer. ECDC 23.80070.a2, Alterations: This engineer is qualified and experienced in geotechnical engineering, and certifies that. - The development (proposed garage) will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond pre -development conditions. ® The development (proposed Salinas garage) will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. • Such alterations (reduction of buffer distance from easterly slope) will not adversely impact other critical areas. ECDC 23.80.070.a3. Design, Standards: This geotechnical engineer certifies the following: City of Edmonds Re: Salinas Property, 1246 Uiewland Way September 17, 2013 Page 9 The proposed development (Salinas garage) shall not decrease the factor of safety for landslide occurrences below the limits of 1.5'for static conditions, and 1.2. for dynamic conditions. O Structures (proposed garage) shall be clustered. (The plans for the solo location of proposed garage). Structures and improvements (new garage) shall minimize. alterations to the natural contour of the slope. The proposed garage will not impact the steep easterly slope in any fashion, providing this engineer performs on -site geotechnical inspections to verify. Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most critical portion of the site and its natural landforms and vegetations. As stated, the proposed garage is located in the "flat! zone of the property and will not adversely impact the easterly slope. o .Proposed development (garage) shall not result in greater risk or a need of increased buffers on neighboring properties. Agreed. o Use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial slopes. No retaining walls are proposed, nor are they required. Proposed small garage structure will not adversely impact the easterly slopes. Development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot coverage. See architect plans. This engineer understands that a portion of the existing impervious concrete driveway is to be removed and replaced with pervious concrete in order to "trade off total impervious surface. 'See architect plans. Geotechnically, no adverse impacts or any drainage surcharge will occur on the easterly -slopes. Subject to this engineer's on -site inspections and verification. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • New garage footing layout verification prior to any concrete placement a Soil cuts. o Foundation sub -grade verification o Any retaining wall, or rockery placement (none anticipated) o Any fill placement City of Edmonds Re: Salinas. Property, September 17, 2013 Page 10 1246 Viewland Way Subsurface drainage installation Verification of storm Water discharge away from steep easterly slope • Temporary and permanent erosion control measures SUMMARY: The proposed neW Salinas garage project at 1246 Viewland Way, Edmonds, Washington is 'geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds Building Department approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specifications for the Salinas garage, prepared by Steve Waite, Architect, have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied: during the construction and use; and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by -construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential'for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made.. The conclusions are based on the results of the field' exploration and. interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the. recommendations. Z If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. K Dennis M., Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer .1 1 comer stake 344.00 (dty. of edmonds) N 89 14 38 W 10&69 ci Vtewland--Way / ( ID / I a / — e Z O I I datum = 348.6V I (concrete entiy landings ti \ ss-0• g ; • setback 0 `L\ downs ng TIT. �j. auwwNo u1FomManoN s DESCRUMON OF WORK ACCESSORY STRUCTURE `y ' . •{ OWNER MUAN,md MARTHA SNZL43 . . • eldifi - driveway PROUECTADDRESS 1248 VIEWUIND WAY 1 . . • • • • • • . PARCEL NO 1 'V LEGAL MWlOR VRW Tes \. • •• `A = 348.01Y. • BBVe I B = 7.317 O EMSTINO 2DNNG Re-f2 . •• - CRITICAL RLES NO. CA: 9' 128 • • : F / - { ,. f 1 - �> - - .�. . ! Lor ,I:• I n e sl2Eldva.m.�m . 15,n9./ }' r : .I�1 . �;►:. ..zx?ti ALLOWED ID'f COVERAGE 5,I11B.6 of ✓`•fefflOva ill 61 D( , 1� • • • 1 - EXISTING BLDG. COVERAGE 4,765 d. f J i�t .�� { ::•: HOUSE 8 GARAGE Rba Ym7 m. • . • ' eAsting,cancxete 1{ I EAVES> 39' PROJECTION o.2 `• • • . ''�,: dnveway and reDlace'.•r� ProP�ed �?s.0.1y -TOTAL EXISTINO COVERAGE ♦•7ta ar '•1�J3,'•• ;,evldi;perviolu NEW aLOG. COVERAGE 509 �} �pf FF EAVES(PROPPOENOct D) fP" • . • . +I. !�r t`t 1 TOTAL COVERAGE. 4354d .. •�.'.' .fi. t��F F� �. '_ jl '.��•. �:•:•. � �:.•.'.•: .• • : 1 348 DO' y C = 34 .4 L HEIGHTCA14LATMM — I AOuAed—.—yhWA-, 16.06 . 1 B 347.3D Ares ta.75491,436W C - 347.4T .0 IiapotN .. wumm= 34767.00' . Ds34&W Nw.-W Hd9M- 112.M' . Are�3a7.69 Apt: 3a2.6W tJ� . TIT• No4a..i.tMj .. .. iA� Work Salinas 1246 Viewland Way Proposed garage location at photo left. Vicinity of proposed garage structure. Proposed garage location at left of photo. Slope at right. Slope easterly of Salinas property. r RECEIVED EXOTM O C T 1 2 199 EXIiTR/�:7111 I8' 46' K'+?'+0'-2�-d' 8-b'1 'fA2 .73 4v •9' A. .1' 15. +3441 -1' -3' -$' -1' -9'-II -PERM . •6'-i_'. N 89'14'38" W ELEV. 461-50 ELEV..344' im8b9' t 1 1 aewwu. a�e.�a Y I E UAL.. AND UJA1'� \� i (. l•'• 't _ at. ;•:. i' x'- �.�T�')):a+!'Sti.^• � ) -^{•s: 1 ! �p I I I 1 ELEV.-V-10" 2 ,, . DEC \ / 1 : h •. Y ti ,, ,R ,yti �t � k`}�'ri K •;1t � t � 1 N I _ DRI VOWAY t I 1} ^ <i ELEV. 46'-04 13 5D N 89'14'38" W 1 ELEv• 44'-Su I 6Z:0m' —1 - � 1 LEGAL,. .35m' oltIGN 4L aAtADL'a •3$0' LOT V1 VIEWLAND WAY 'zy Vj�W�p61(11 VVGrL� ALCONMAR CON5TRUCT I ON S 1 TE PLAN 0 5 � zm .� 1" = 20'-0" _7 45 -MW_ CAI li1,AI,-)r,k FILE: A\ tie DATE, "TecTuRA e ` t 9-ro-%4 °ice .6 ,034 CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE PERMIT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION roe NUMBER ,���®�¢ r su1TE/, OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS /' r / I G ) 1 A ) ^ /, )A l`'�/ PUBLIC RIGHT OF E:ISTING PROPOSED WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. REQUIRED DEDICATION TESCP APPImed O RW Permit Required O Street Use Permit Reed O InSpntion Required O Sidewalk Required O ZIP ./�i 0-5 TELEPHONE NUMBER I1 ('� I !" METER SIZE I LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES O NO O REMARKS ZIP 7777PH TELEPHONE NUMBER G 1_ i L C ENGINEERING MEM ATED . 11 L) Q EVIEWED aY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER M r R15VIEWFPf" ! '.NUMflFji ,� C EXPIRATION DATE / SIGN ALLOWED AREA PROPOSED SEPAREVIEW COMPL TE EXEMPT EXAM ADB iption of Property - include all easements SHO VARIANCE jl CU P N W BY' AT Progeny TaX Account Parcel No. %g s =C�o - CL' NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REMODEL APT. BLDG. SIGN O GRADING FENCE REPAIR CYDS. (_ x —FT) DEMOLISH O INSERDTSTOVE O SW OOL HO TUB/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY a RENEWAL ,NUMBER O OI OFMBER ' I DWELLING F . 1 I,, IARIEASAL tj, / r —/ SIDE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPAI ' I GROUA. SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPAI REQUIRED O YES LOAD MARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 v La FINIAL INSPECTION REOUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING O O G"� % �7 PLUMBING Plan Check No. / —2nq MECHANICAL -' This Permit covers work to be done on private properly ONLY. GRADINGrFILL Any construction on the public domain (curCs, sidewPlks, driveways, marquee$, etc.) will require Separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE/ "Applicant, on behalf of his Or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENO. INSPECTION FEE successors In interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, x employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of i whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance = of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PUN CHECK DEPOSIT 9 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance i nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized' agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT stale laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES This application Ia not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the Slate of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt Is tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged In space provided. SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT( DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF OFF L' SIGN TORE DATE ! EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR _ SECD& INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-�22� ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 9. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor PLANNING DATA SITE ADDRESS: /246 VYEL,)1,A-� COY, DATE: 11 /2294 ZONING: i `l2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front:;0Left Side:__ZD Right Side:__L_Q_Rear: 26 Actual Setbacks: Front: �2 5 Left Side: l O Right Side:14 Rear:_�� FLOOR AREA: LOT COVERAGE: / Maximum Allowed:56/99 l35c>� Actual:-05-0 (219 a BUILDING HEIGHT: Maximum Allowed:- Z (2511tual Height: CRITICAL AREAS #: C 9 -Z4 — I Z� SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT AR OTH a q-C CITY COPY RKR ALCONMAR 1�nj DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS O C T 1 2 1994 PERMIT COUNTER The tributary drainage area to the subject site is less than 200 acres, therefore the Rational Method is used. Q=CiA 10-year storm event (pre -development & release) 25-year storm event (storage)- >5% slope Tital area = .36 ac. AR = On -site retained area = .26 ac. AS = Rear yard bypass area = .1 ac. Hydrologic Analysis: Existing retained: Light grass & bare ground C,r= . 2 5 Time of concentration: AREA .26 ac. Condition Length Slope Light Grass & 120 ft 12% Bare ground Tc(R) existing = 10min. + 1 = 11 min. Therefore ie = 1.75 inches/hour Velocity 2.5 fps .25 / C� T° ®` ` cc t 1 min Jt O� 0 VIAshr{rj�YC� .. @yp .Q� 29429 GIST s`SIONAL I EXPIRES Z!Y_ f r i 1 or L CON ti,49 L o f 7 :l We-i tf14&s^ y p4' RKR ALCONMAR DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS (Continued) Bypass: A portion of the open space at the east perimeter (.1 acre) bypasses the proposed detention system. Proposed: AREA C Impervious (Bldg. & Pavement) .16 ac. .9 Light grass & bare ground .1 ac. .25 TOTAL .26 acres C�= (.16(.9)+.1(.25)/.26 = .65 / Qnll,lo,r = CIA = .25(l.75)(.26) _ .1138 cfs may .114 cfs Q. = Qaei/AR*CR = .114/.26*.65 = .67 cfs / DETENTION REQUIRED Peak storage time (orifice w/head) T = -25 + SQRT(2706/Qa) = -25 + SQRT(2706/.67) = 38.6 min. Maximum storage volume VS = (4329(T)/(T+25)) - 40*Qo*T (4329(38.6)/(38.6+25)) - 40*.67*38.6 = 1592.9 cu ft/ac Total storage = Vt = VB * acres * C, LGI . 6 0K 1592.9*.26*.6� = 277.5 cubic feet = 2,076 gallons t 2 RKR ALCONMAR Orifice sizing Qall,loyr = .25(l.75)(.26) = .114 cfs Q = Cd*A SQRT ( 2gH ) Where; Q = flow cfs Ca= .62 (Sharp edged orifice) g = 32.2 ft/s/s H=ft A = Q/.62*SQRT(64.4*H) = sq. ft. Let H = 3.2 feet Qloyr = Ca*A1 SQRT ( 2gH ) Where; Q = .114 cfs Ca= . 6 2 g = 32.2 ft/s/s H1 = 3.2 ft Al = .114/.62*SQRT(64.4*3.2) _ .0128 sq. ft. % Orifice Diam. = SQRT(.0128*4/3.14) = .128' = 1.53" (inc✓hes) I y/ 0 RISER CHECK FOR 10 YEAR EVENT: Assume pond is full to top of riser and lower orifice is plugged. Q = (.65)2.15(.26) = .36 cfs 8" (inch) diam. riser considered as orifice Q = 3.782D2*SQRT(H) = .36 cfs, D = .67 foot Therefore; H = (.212)2 = .045' < .5' ok Flow in 8" outlet pipe with s=.129, n=.022, FULL pipe FULL pipe Q = 2.57 cfs > .36 cfs ok 3 FIT KEY F-K-03 To ur MCI -DF.7E.N 7 tpht \10L� U ME CRLCS 7ypE Z cg — 3' dep{h U= ►S c.0 P4, V or ) 2" 4f P ;re. _ --ypc Lr GE 3.2'dg4k V = Ho, 2 Jo iA%-V\f CE �n 1pr� t i P-e z77.S-56.7= *72v,8 - ?r if k I `l D= 3' � cMP 4 M b-1 (o /391 RECEIVED 0 C T 1 2 1994 ,at .....,.. xttm5n ww�m= v. • .� COR STAKE _ ELEv. #3444' 108b9' 1 OPWWL4 - 4WAMO VIEU�'L �Y MJ ELEV.-T-10" . 3ySQ$ DS Al. 3y(4. 389 RECtIVED 3yq �IRA PERMIT C01 s 4�3Y8,25 -+'25 = 373,25 \I \ I ELV 46'-0* I I LEGAL= ' LOT V"I v1EWLANO WAY r 2y G Vie,W land. WtIU Ta DcIST9i6 aRADE6 ii%t i,•?ti f� 1 Ilk AWN i - 0 NT 1 I• ou Tj 1 z 1 1 f 350, I �o t�1 89'14'38" W 1 ELEV. «4'-9" ck PPRt/Y PLANNING ;naau. oeeIGN a Rvi imsa r,e.u„p u,e t" 7Q1�.116 -3C: . , ;. PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME: A T"La (2-K PROJECT ADDRESS: LI co 1E-1i)4,j" PLAN CHECK RECEIPT DATE:_ REVIEWED BY: Initial/Da e) PLAN. WATER COMMENTS FIRE BLDG. SEWER STREET EN,... Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment hd•}.: rr:.,':.v�;.s.y;�•` 'v fr.:iy > � . � • ••:.. _ , •« r:;�,,,:•: `.,.�:Yr:}:•<.::�:`;,�: %r'a'`E�:`�''.f'r 1':`'' �� Conditional Use Permit #Y .• h:>,:, • ,,:,;rY.z%�? 2 ' ADB Requirements `.°:;'' 3 Other Zoning Requirements ::;ry •:,::;:,,:J, '4 Underground Wiring Required y` R.rr fo) q 5 Lot Slope I S% ::• :• •. 6 SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit v Tree Cutting Plan ` : • :¢ f '«rxr '. :. g Plat/Subdivision Requirements :<s<� i`: :4 "g Legal Description Verification Quit Claim/Street Dedications $':`<:`#:;ak;: .. }$�.::.:. Easements - Public/Private ...... 1011 WIT4, 12 Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee 3v :> <}� k. Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee 3 Drainage Plan On -Site • ,.�; �• �:.:�s; �,:�,:$�• :.; $ ,,; ,�s, ,�� ,�: Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses ;�.}.,,.». Setback - Storm Drain Line Open Ditch - Existing Culvert Required �$ Culvert Size Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff }'k :{,:Y•Y4;h Catch Basin Required Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access Sidewalk Required :,}.v .<,?r'•$:: ! :2R::.}.:.,,•:::.}'rr. co-: v: Curb & Gutter Required , .24 Curb Cut For Driveway Required'Lill' ` yl,: ' r {$,lf.}Vfl •r. r:tJ Street Paving Required Yls }'}tik :tiff .::..: {:;ri4.;,,....',}.}`t,� .`...:..,}.,:...:�'"'• f. fi s ' . <. h $ ::;:27 Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required Street Name Sign RequiredMEMO Other Signing Required Bond Required For Public Improvements ..>.:x h'• :'' FEMA Map Check/Water Table, ""(`:, t /( 32 <:: Side Sewer Availability t ✓ Flo N r•:..Y... :....>},::;.n::, ' Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID Create Street File io tlp . }< ,': �_ .• 35=; Existing Water Main Size Water Meter Sizeyly Service Line Size Water Meter Charge Required Hydrant Required Hydrant Size Existingn ' K ...< TI!C �.�. Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler Street Cut i t ::42. ;. Miscellaneous WORK, Reviewed By: FIRE �/ PLANNING (' ••-�' ENGINEERING /11� c� PUBLIC WORKS. r 6- RECORD OF CONTAC S 1 21 2 22 3 23 4 24 5 25 6 26 7 27 8 28 RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED :' RECEIPT 9 29 10 30 11 31 12 32 13 PAID RECEIPT # DATE 33 SS PERMIT # S,7 DATE ISSUE RECEIPT # l4 PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE 34 l5 35 l6 36 L7 37 METER SIZES PAID $ ,5 DATE zoAE CEIPT 18 38 l9, 39 '_0 40 i JSE CITY OF EDMONDS zoNE PERMIT NUMBER950023 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB S— OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS SUITE/APT e I I`— 1i1Conmar CO. ADDRESS -1101 11 1 hSQ�o'`^P/!� CITY 2 �P Iri3OfiN s 18 C STATE LICENSE NUMBER 1 >nnl flnenri nlinn of Prnnnrly _ incln LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK t C SUBDIVISION NO. 2-8L 1 N I f i ; B PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. ./� EwsTINO REQUIRED DEDICATION TESCP APprored O RW Permit Required Iq Street Use Permit ReR'd O InaWtion Reqequired ' Sidewalk Ruired O 'ENUMBER 2 PROPOSED (C7Cf/ METER IZEyf I LIN RZE N0. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YEsX NO Q REMARKS ;ONE MBER U•G. Tattle �iDr} situ, kk '(1C�!'tiLl l - 303 C,I SJlwt /n� 5 (s INsi' • 4t;fnec4 �* `� �/NR2 C�I�f1ti lll6f 2Ecfl W. ENGINEERING MEMO DATED IEWED BY• 'HONE NUMBER [14 •' 3 IR MEM A D REVIEWED EXPIRATION DATE i - SIGN AREA - I SEPA REVIEW A0B ae>mnnta ALLOWED I 'PROPOSED COMPUgTE ,IEXEMPT I I �_ I VilfW c:$iAM5 v Ar FEET SAN HEIGH LOT V proPeny FDID EAR .Tax Aeodunt 000007 MAR Parcel N0.' TZ95 000 to NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ElADDITION O COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL - OREMODEL O APT. BLDG. SIGN Is O� FENCE CH BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT GRO REPAIR CrOa I_ x _FT) / Sw POOL DEMOLISH ❑ INSER E NOT TUB SPA POU1RED ECIAL INSPECTOR AREA 1 glm YES LOAD ' ®GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL REMARKS 0 (TYPE OFUSE. BUSINESS ORACTIWTY)EXPLAIN' PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 P' m'P .•j NUMBER NUMBE F CRITICAL G OF I DWELLING L AREAS ' / �'zZ(o 4` STORIES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE UNITS L (ATTACH PLOT PLANT NUMBER ♦✓ * K FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE 6 �! HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING V 1 I ar I % PLUMBING ZG Plan Check No. _� MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curCs, sidewPlke, driveways, marquees, etc.) Will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Pemlit Applics8on:180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE 30 "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and and ENO. INSPECTION FEE 3 successors in Interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, a employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly Irom the Issuance do of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 9 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance i nor limit In any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby ack,Ig�Qwledge that I have read this application; that the Information glJbn la correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES This application Is not a permit until ad thereby, no person will be employed In violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt Is tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged In space provided. IGNA URE IOW ER O/R� AGE N I DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT ` Q• MYn fo O(� CITY OF OF I AL'S DI ATURE DATE f�f` 11• lT EDMONDS 3 ATTENTION CALL FOR ELEAS D DATE INSPECTION — IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ��� �OGGO ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFCATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK —Owrer GOLD —Assessor �.................... ... . CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) Dick 01linger MAILING ADDRESS 651 5th Ave. South CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Edmonds 774-4141 Bob Champion ADDRESS 3802 Colby NE NUMB Everett IT259� 3136 NAME Bidding ADDRESS CITY [TELEPHONE NUMBER LICENSE NUMBER peon OT eroperty . include all easements or attach four copies) Lot 7 Harbor View Estates, Vol. 451, Page 72,, Record Snohomish County aNEW ® RESIDENTIAL VCHANIC ADD/ALTER COMM CIAL REPAIR ® WALL El SIGN DEMOLISH REMODEL AT FILL SPJ ® FENCE x. SWIM NCE INSP. POOL - WOO INSERT ❑ APT. BLDG RENEWAL NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 2 DWELLING UNITS 1 NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) Enclosed I/L y lFe, ZONE 14�P5 /Z JOB ADDRESS RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION F STREET USE PERMIT REOUIRED SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DA EI METE SI E BUILDING SUPPLY �y I A6", FRONT REAR BY TESCP MAP. I APPROVED BY a Z cc i 0 Z W SAP. GT7D,� FIXTURE UNITS W F Q 3 'VIEW ADS NO. EXEMPT i SHORELINE p IE DATE HEIGHT ILOT COVERAGE oI A. /9� INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY GROUP C. NO RPS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL L This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, STATE SURCHARGE driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year •Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days EN�ACiyS ODE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and p� 1 n L L 0 N successors in Interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend and hold to harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of Q = whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT omodify,, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE x nor limit in any way the City's ability.to enforce any ordinance provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given Is' correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz• THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED ti r Insurance. INSPECTION SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS ATTENTION 771-3202 VALUA O/✓ Z —/00 HEIGHT I zs OCCUPANT LOAD M APPLICATION APPROVAL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt Is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE RELEASED BY: DATE O Z 9 2 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR �f� �v ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC Ory/ CHAPTER 3. PINK — nwnar rr)i n — eccaecnr - - ' C4'�tw S4+bsh �saYts t F=OR�CT •-ter,• / /� . � � I �_-�" -` `--- •- - •_--- _ .-_ _ -- - - - - -- -- - --�' LOT � r�14s 1 �i� ------ lf.• � ' iY �"�•tJ a� 1 � -'r I' ?'}' - r-�hf-r - rin: jiMf� \ / tIV *04 fro 0./ ,ems 'mot T PATIO (J18 S.F tAWN .tTR�kN� 470 AD FT "vAria 45-8 K -_• �4Ld_ FAST BA-rIoS To i5E GRASS) j • � � � ( - ._.._ ice]— � f _ , � . �-l._ - _ ( 1 �! � . � i � . Ian at lot vow Fag VIOLATION #:ZE-$9-25 ZONE DST:RS 12 DATE OF COMPLAINT: 10/09/89 VIOLATION:'Non Payment 2" DATE OF INSP/LTR: 10/17/89 PROPERTY LOCATION: �iewland Way PROPERTY OWNER: Dick 011inger, 651 5th Ave., So., Edmond s��' COMPLAINANT: COE BLDG, Edmonds WA ) ``.__.SURROUNDING LAND USE: REPORT: On 10/09/89 a report was made by the City Of Edmonds Building Dept. that Dick 011inger refused to pay the plan check fee costs. The plan costs were $984.00, less a $100.00 deposit totaling $884.00 owed 4AL by Mr 011inger. CONCLUSION: Refer case to City Attorney's office for prosecution, either criminal or small claims court. REPORTING OFFICIAL: John E. Bissell Code Enforcement Tech. cc Bldg. 9113/ .Toyv- w� Aw .suebus ' :".�;.. i?»,.,.amarr,.w..,_-..�r._...sc.'--,�—.._•r--..ay.'--`-�..�.-.sa�..e�w�...._.; _. M E M O R A N D U M October 9, 1989 TO: John Bissell Code Enforcement Technician FROM: Jeannine Graf 6�,R` Permit Coordinator SUBJECT: PLAN CHECK FEE VIOLATIONS Section 304(c) of the Uniform Building Code requires that applicants are responsible for all incurred plan check fees for permit review whether or not a permit is subsequently issued. The following individuals owe the Building Department plan review fees. In each case the applicant has been officially notified and has disregarded the notice. Please resolve by collecting the fees or prepare the cases for the City Attorney's office. Dick 011inger Paul O'Brien 651 - 5th Avenue S. 21616 - 76th Avenue W Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: 1245 Viewland Way RE: 141 Caspers Street FEE: $884.00 FEE: $345.00 FEEVIOLA/TXTJLG52 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning • Parks and Recreation - Engineering 8go_19C) August 16, 1989 Robert Champion, Architect 3802 Colby Avenue Everett, WA 98201 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E.HAHN DIRECTOR ?ek t- P/t RE: Single Family Residence Permit Application 011inger Residence-A'Viewland Way Please be advise the subject permit application will expire on 9/12/89. The application has already been extended once and as provided in Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code, cannot be granted a second extension. It may be possible to resolve all the outstanding issues from the Planning and Building Divisions. It is your responsibility to pursue these outstanding items. At this time, the retraining plan check fees for.the project in the amount of $884.00 are due. Please remit the required fee by 9/12/89. Application materials will be returned if the fees are received by 9/12/89. If there are any question you may have, please contact the Building Division at 771-3202, extension 257. Thank you, Ajeannine Graf Permit Coordinator - Incorporated August 11. 1890 - Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 194 CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 � COMMUNITY SERVICES: t9� PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR March 27, 1989 Dick 011inger 651 5th Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: SF P mit Application 1 Viewland Way 21% According to building division records the subject permit application is due to expire on April 12th, 1989. Section 303 (d) of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Building Code allows a permit application extension of 180 days provided that a written request to the building official is received prior to the expiration date. If you allow the application to expire you would have to make a new submittal in the future if you decided to pursue the work. If you have decided not to continue with the construction at this time please call if you would like the plans returned. At this time plan check fees of $884.00 are due for services rendered. Please contact the building division at 771-3202 with regard to your intentions. Thank you, (/*MX 5 Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator cc: Bob Champion • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890-199- CITY OF EDMONDS S T 250 - 5th AVE N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning - Parks and Recreation - Engineering October 12, 1988 Robert Champion Champion Architects 3802 Colby Avenue Everett, Washington 98201 RE: 011inger Residence 5 Viewland Way LARRY S. NAUGHTEN F% MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The City received your response to the structural and non-structural plan check for the subject residence on 10/12/88. The response is not acceptable. 1. Soils Report: Approval of the plans is dependent upon the conclusions and recommendations drawn in the soils report. If the plans, (structural details and design) must change due to the outcome of the report further review time by the City will be necessary. The City will not release the permit for construction until all required changes or additions from the soils report are incorporated into the plans and the City has reviewed and approved the plans. 2. Richard Schipanski will respond to you by letter regardingthe height calculations, lot coverage, conditional use permit and second living unit. 3. The response to the ICBO plan check by providing an addendum sheet is not acceptable. The City requires that you submit two sets of plans clearly showing all corrections. Attach a copy of addendum No. 4 to these plans and indicate the page number where the corrections can be found on the drawings. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, Jeannine L. raf Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan LJ CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works C Planning e Parks and Recreatlor' is r9 October 5, 1988 Bob Champion Champion Architects 3802 Colby Avenue Everett, Wa 98021 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR RE: Lot 7 Harbor View Estates 12 Z11eZ '1_4 d ZN / PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Dear Mr. Champion,. The following information is required prior to Planning Division approval: 1. Please provide height calculations consistent with the enclosed height handout. 2. Provide a detailed plan indicating lot coverage. The lot coverage calculation must include all structures. Structures are defined as a combination of materials constructed and erected permanently on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground. This defination,would include decks, terraces, and pools. 3. The site plan must be re -designed so that the terraces on the east side meet the setback requirements. Section 16.20.040 B. of the Edmonds Community Development Code states that uncovered and unenclosed porches, steps, patios, and decks may project into a required setback not more than one-third of the required setback, or four feet , whichever is less, provided that they are no more than 30 inches above ground level at any point. Two of the proposed terraces on your plan do not meet this requirement. If you have any questions please contact me at 771-3202 i Sincerely, i Richard Schipanski Planning Division Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: � Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineerinc 84646� 8g0.1q September 12, 1988 Bob Champion Champion Architects 3802 Colby Avenue Everett, Washington 98201 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR RE: Lot 7 Harbor View Estates 124& !/ lewl-w�yd Z4 AY The following information is required prior to accepting the permit application for plan check: PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR 1. Please complete, sign and return the enclosed permit application. The pink copy was missing from the original application. 2. Provide general notes. Handout enclosed. 3. Height calculations should be prepared by the surveyor. See the enclosed height handout. 4. Indicate the number of cubic yards to be moved, graded or filled. 5. A soils investigation is required; recommendations from the soils engineer shall be incorporated in the plan design. The City is reluctant to begin the plan check on the structure subject to receiving the soils report. To avoid delay in the plan check process please submit the report at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, Jeannine L. Gra Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 _ 194 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation S? g"` Td,gQ September 26, 1988 Bob Champion Champion Architects 3802 Colby Avenue Everett, Washington 98201 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR RE: Lot 7 Harbor View Estates / 27% / e44110flYtj�"Y PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Prior to issuance of the permit it will be necessary for you to provide the following: 1. A soils investigation is required; recommendations from the soils engineer shall be incorporated in the plan design; 2. Height calculations must be submitted in order to determine that the height requirements of the plat are met. City records indicate the maximum elevation allowed on the lot however; height calculations prepared by a surveyor are required to substantiate the permitted elevation. This is a City requirement that has been adhered to by all other lots on the plat of Harbor View; 3. The permit application form must be signed by the owner/s of the property or the licensed general contractor for the project. The City will retain the application form, please have the appropriate party visit the City to sign the application at their earliest convenience. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, i Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan MEMORANDUM From: Craig Campbell Lovell Sauerland Associates ����1 �\\�u" | 19400 33rd Ave W. ��' � | Lynnygod, Wa. 98037 775-1591 340-0830 � � To: Jerry Hauth �w4w City of Edmonds Subject: Harbor View Estates, Lot #7 - -- As I mentioned on the phone earlier this week, I would like your opinion on a potential solution to a detention problem we are dealing with on the subject property. ' The architectural and landscape design for this property have _considerably more impervious area than was originally allowed for in the plat storm drainage plan. In order to pick up the runoff for the driveway area (close to 2500 square feet) a detention system would have to be shallow, and therefore very long. Calculating a larger bypass flow results in an unreasonably small orifice outlet. An alternative is to have two systems on the property, but this also seems unreasonabe. A possible solution is to run the overflow pipe, assumed to be 4" diameter PVC, along the street frontage of lot number B. The right of way is wide enough to allow a pipe to be trenched without affecting the existing sidewalk, and without infringing on the property line of lot B. The sidewalk would be broken out and replaced only at the point of discharge to the street. A plan was considered to connect the pipe to the existing storm drain, but in the vicinity of the drain the right of Way is reduced to 1 foot beyond the edge of the sidewalk. This plan did not seem to provide adequate space without infringing on lot 9. I'am interested in determing your reaction to the solution proposed or any other suggestions you may have regarding this matter. IJ _A /_ o IN, Iq C-:7) co NviLLIry v f N -.--TRACT IC _�_--OPE.N..SPA (TO BE DEEDED TO THE. 3 30,03'*� O\r 0 f REVISED RESTRICTIONS:AND COVENANTS NO. 2 FOR PLAT OF HARBOR.VIEW ESTATES ORIGINAL RECORDING #8405030178 DATED 1984 MAS REVISION NO. 1, RECORDING #8509230302 DATED 1985 S�rjl 2 THIS INDENTURE and•def larntion of restrictions and protective covenants running with the and, made this / day of � i, , 1.9.6 by AEN HOLT INDUSTRIES, INC., a ashington corporation, PIONEER FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Washington corporation, SONAR PETERS09 and HELGA PETERSON, husband and wife, KENNETH FORD, a single i� man i e WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, said parties are the Owners in fee and Mortgagee of Lots 1 through 12, inclusive, Harbor View Estates, according to the plat thereof as the same is recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, on pages 72 and 73 , records of Snohomish County, Washington; and, WHEREAS, it is the desire of.said parties that said restrictions and covenants be recorded and that said restrictions and covenants be thereby impressed upon said land, now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY MADE KNOWN THAT said parties do by these presents make, establish, confirm and hereby impress upon Lots 1 through 12, Inclusive, Harbor View Estates, ar_courding to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 45 of Plats, pages 72 and 73 , records of Snohomish County, Washington, the following; restrictions and covenants to rtin with said land, and do }creby hind said parties ,and all of their future g;rnntees, nssigness and successors to said restrictinns and covenants for the tnrm hereinafter stated and as follow;.,: 1. The area covered by these covenants is the entire area described above. 2. No lot :shall be used except for residential purposes. No building; shall be erected, altered, '.tacr..] or permitted to remain on any lot other than one detached single-family dwelling. 3. All buildings to be constructed shall utilize cedar shake or tile roofing. I 4. No residence shall. be constructed without a minimum of a two -car garage. No "carport.-," shall be allowed. 5. No recreational vehicle, boat, or -machine of any kind shall be parked (for a period longer than 48 hours) on the city street right of way or on any lot, in a position where'it is not obscured from general view. 6. Any vehicle which is in an inoperable condition for more than 48 hours shall not be parked in any location, other than.within a resident's garage. 7. No structure of a temporary character, trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn or any other outbuilding shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence, either temporarily or permanently. 8. Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot in this subdivision shall be completed as to external appearance, including finish painting, with- in six months from date of start of construction except for reasons beyond control, in which case a longer period may be permitted upon approval of the •Architectural Control Administrator. 9. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any lot except that dogs, chts or other household pets may be kept, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purposes. 10. Trees and vegetation planted or implanted on any respective lot shall not be permitted or allow to exceed in elevation, extend above, and/or grow higher than the uppermost ridgeline of the residence constructed thereon. 11. The use of external'anteanae for the reception and/or transmission of any radio or television signals shall be prohibited unless acceptable by the Architectural Control Administrator. BUILDING SEP 2 G 1983 8604230 214 n Revision No. 2 Restrictions and Covenants for harbor View Estates Page 2 12. No goodsequipment, trucks, vehicles.or paraphernalia used or designed i for use n connection with any business, service or trade shall be kept or stored in the open on any lot in quantities or in a manner which is un- sightly or objectionable to other owners of property in the vicinity. 13. All front yard landscaping on any respective lot must be completed within six (6) months from the date of completion of the residence constructed thereon. 14. No fence or wall shall be permitted between the front of any residence and the street right of way, except that decorative fences having a height of no more than three (3) feet may be constructed in said areas. 15. No building, dwelling, or structure, shall be constructed, placed,.or erected, on anylot, whereby any paror uppermost extremity of said build t ing, dwelling, or structure, exceeds in elevation, extends above, or is higher than a certain horizontal plane, the elevations of which planes, with reference to City of Edmonds Vertical Datum (Mean Lower Low Water), are as follows, to wit: Lot 1: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 292.00. Lot 2: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 310.00 or as may be determined by the Edmonds Department of Community Services, whichever elevation may be lower. Lot 3: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 330.00. F Lot 4: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 348.00. Lot 5: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 366.00. Lot 6: A hor�irontal plane having, an elevation of 378.00. Lot 7: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 380.00. l Lot 8: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 366.00. Lot 9: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 343.00. Lot 10: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 324.00, Lot 11: A horizontal plane having an elevation of 305.00 or as may be determined by the Edmonds Department of Community Services, whichever elevation may be lower. Lot 12: A horizontal plane raving an elevation of 287.00. 16. No building or structure shall be erected, place, or altered upon any lot until the construction plans and specifications for such, including a plan showing the location of the building or structure, have been submitted to and approved by'the Architectural Control Administrator as to the quality of workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing structures, and as to location with respect to water and mountain view, topography, and finished grade elevations. Upon receiving such plans and specifications, the Architectural Control Administrator, or his duly appointed successor, shall, within seven (7) days and in writing, approve or disapprove such plans and specifications,which decision will be final and binding upon all parties. 17. 'The Architectural Control Administrator will be BEN HOLT, whose address is 22224 Highway 99, Edmovids, Washington. At such time as all of the lots in Harbor View Estates, as such are covered by this declaration, have been sold by Ben Holt Industries, Inc., the responsibility and duty of BEN ITOLT, as Architectural Control Administrator, shall cease and the then -record owners of a majority of the lots in Harbor View Estates may, through a duly re- corded instrument, appoint a successor to such office or may elect persons from among their number to serve in the capacity of an Architectural Control Committee. 18. These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period of thirty years from the date these covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive; periods of ten years unless an instru- ment signed by?a majority of the then-ownersof the lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in whole or in part. 8604230214 V R Revision No. 2 Restrictions and Covenants forHarbor View Estates Page 3 19. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to re- strain violation or to recover damages. 20. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in nowise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have, affixed their signatures. BEN HOLT INDUSTRIES, INC. By=� BEN HOLT, PRESIDENT i PIONEER FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS'AND LOAN ASSOCIATION a `► STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this- 18"�h day of 4 , 1986, before me personally appeared to me known to be the of F--�-V�y BEN HOLT INDUSTRIES, INC., the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal or said corporation. Witness my hand ana official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. .,n ; CW=L _t Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing a ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have affixed their signatures. By ONAR PETS7(z��Irb er t By.r HELG,k PETERSON, Owner P • STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS. COUNTY OF On this day personally appeared before me Bonar Peterson and Helga Peterson, husband and wife, to me:known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and,foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he and she signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this % � day of lyI— 1986. �� Notary Public in and fok : 1 e Stste o5l 4Z�l�x O �� Washington, residing at,, 1/'11/ii.-• J r' 9 Revision No. 2 By strictions and Covenants for Harbor View Estates I S WHEREOFA a undersigned :has affixed his signature. KENNETH FORD, Owner STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) SS. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) Page 4 On this day per appeared before me Kenneth Ford, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as hie free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of �1 ��s , 1986. i Notary Public in and fo the State o,E� Washington, residin, at�,�1�1,.•--,-*�� a TATE OF WASHINGTON, S.q. :ounty of A'Lihmi 44 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /41,fxA T. 8p�,le$ et—,( ���`�+ �� ra✓ vnrd this/ ,iinstru/(fnent,, on�yoathh s6ted thalt 4Ap1 were autha ired to execute _the �inst ment and . eknowledgwl a!; the Y,-tL •/fJiAll�/ 'rU/L�. .�e�1[lPR./ I //"CtiO J or r"/On! r♦ Pr+Cl/ I/.ia�� �. he the free and voluntary actiof such part7for the -uses and purposes mentioned in this instruif nt. Notary Public in� gjnd for he State of Wovhinglon, reviling at oJre ems. My appointment expires /o`/�Shp TIM6I RPA'k1:9ENTAT1Vr � d a w 0 F � c :< r -'� rD s Ln C1 604230 214 /3ti1 RECEIVED O C T 1 2 1994 Ca=11E. m �/IEU�L.A ,4Y 13�y,h EL vE : 3'-Im' . E)f1YTP1� �RADEe EXIAT!!s GIFADE6 314S.S, 344vo-!; .31+9. 3y(. 381 -:-z•I ■ 1t :�a.4 ..i a.w w` � i� 3'y5.5 3y 4 J4 N 0 9 1999 r 3sa -w* 108b9' I %i y��j'�'� �2� Wit• � A 1 >tiM ,S 1 DEC� Ior \ z _. I � 1 I3y � 1 I I �sb D I 350 � t I5 Im' BSBL: 35 1 P1 89'14'38" W 1 FI EV- 44'-`' LEGAL; APPR(/ PLANNING .3$La' ORIGRJAL �3$m' LOT 01 NIEULAND WAY '2Lj vl`WIQd)(� fGr� '6 ALGON1" 1AR CONSTRUCTION FILE: S 1 TE FLAN �m ,� lew A\ _ DATE: ����� o�e�N �R SCALE 13236 Nonlvp Ale.lww.. 20' —0" _7145 _ 35CI � • A ' 1 1 j IGi I,7(' k, 9-r.-S4 70i-146-3C IM PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Owner: Plan Check No: Address: 11- ( OeW(,Alk) Ni" Date:_ ---------- ---------- —---------------------------------- ------------------------- -------- ---------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------- After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS -- 7:00 A.M. 10:00 P.M.WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS--10:00 A.M: 6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 18.30.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate permit -is required. LID# 11:i-)_ Fees paid: Yes No Charge S (ECDC 18.10)t. 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 18.90) PRMTREQR.DOT PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Lyle Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Owner: M%r�"JT-(� Plan Check No: Address: ���"� V�� A6414 Date:_ After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS -- 7:00 A.M. 10:00 P.M.WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS —10:00 A.M.-6:00 P.M. 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 18.30.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 6. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 18.30) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. (ECDC 18.30) S. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) 10. Driveways must be paved from property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 11. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) 1 �jLis 1 ' 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A separate p`�rnS �uired. I L�_ Fees paid: Yes No Charge (ECDC 18.10). 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 18. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DMSION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTUETETTILE PRMMQRDOT PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME:PLAN CHECK PROJECT ADDRESS: RECEIPT DATE:_ /O /,7-,W/ EVIEW D BY: (nitial/De e) PLAN WATER ER COMMENTS ;> FIRE BLDG: SEWER STREE......EN.G.: Permit ments Lot Slope I S% SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit Tree Cutting Plan Plat/Subdivision Requirements Legal Description Verification Quit Claim/Street Dedications Easements - Public/Private Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee 3y Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee 3� Drainage Plan (On -Site), Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses Setback - Storm Drain Line Open Ditch - Existing Culvert Required Culvert Size Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access Sidewalk Required Curb & Gutter Required Curb Cut For Driveway Required Street Paving Required 'tom Right -Of -Way Construction Permit R Street Name Sian Required Bond Re uired For Public Improvements. FEMA Map Check/Water Table Side Sewer Availability 06 Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # Create Street File W i�;, Existing Water Main Size Water Meter Size Service Line Size Water Meter Char - a Required Hydrant Required Hydrant Size Existing Fire Une Charge Required - Sprinkler Street Cut Miscellaneous Reviewed By:Etc i FIRE PLANNING R ii e t7_� � INEERING PUBLIC WORKS RKR ALCONMAR DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS The tributary drainage area to the subject site is less than 200 acres, therefore the Rational Method is used. Q=CiA 10-year storm event (pre -development & release) 25-year storm event (storage) >5% slope Tital area = .36 ac. AR = On -site retained area = .26 ac.. AB =.Rear yard bypass area = .1 ac. Hydrologic Analysis: Existing -retained: AREA C Light grass & bare ground .26 ac. .25 C,= .25 'Time of concentration: Condition Length Slope Light Grass & 120 ft 12% Bare ground Tc(R) existing 10min. + 1 = 11 min. Therefore ie = 1.75 inches/hour Velocity 2.5 fps RECE,VCD O C T 12 1994 PE13MIT Comm'R S'C P / 1 f r CoAvMA9 - L o f 7 RKR ALCONMAR DRAINAGE CALCUL.ATIONS.(Continued1 Bypass: A portion of the open space at the east perimeter (.1 acre) bypasses'the proposed detention system. Proposed: AREA C Impervious (Bldg. & Pavement,) .16 ac. .9 Light grass & bare ground .1 ac. .25 TOTAL .26 acres Cc= (.16(.9)+.1(.25)/.26 = .65 Qa11,10yr = CIA = .25(1.75) (.26) _ .1138 cfs say .114 cfs Q. = Qadi/AR*CR. _ .1'14/.26*.65 = .67 cfs DETENTION REQUIRED Peak storage time (orifice w/head) .T -25 + SQRT(2706/Qo) -25 + SQRT(2706/.67) = 3'8.6.min. Maximum storage volume VS = (4329(,T)/(T+25)) 40*Qo*T _ (4329(38.6)/•(38.6+25)) - 40*.67*38.6 = 1592.9.cu ft/ac Total storage = Vt = . V, * acres * .,C, 1592.9*.26*'.67 = 277.5 cubic -'feet 2,076 gallons 2 t - I RKR ALCONNIAR Orifice sizing Qa11,10yr = .25(l.75)(.26) _ .114 cfs Q = Cd*A SQRT ( 2gH ) Where; Q = flow cfs Cd= .62-(Sharp edged orifice) g = . 32.2 ft/s/s I'I H=ft A = Q/.62*SQRT(64.4*H) = sq: ft. Let H = 3.2 feet Q10Y r = Cd*A1 SQRT ( 2gH ) Where Q = .114 cfs Cd= .62 g = 32.2 ft/s/s H; = 3.2 ft A, .114/.62*SQRT(64.4*3.2) _ .0128 sq. ft.. Orifice,Diam. = SQRT(..0128*4/3.14) _ .128" = 1.5311, (inches) RISER CHECK.FOR 10 YEAR EVENT: Assume,pond is full to top of riser and lower orifice is plugged. f Q = (.65)2.15(.26),= .36 cfs 8" (inch) diam. riser considered as orifice Q = 3.•782D2*SQRT(H) _ .36 cfs, D = .67 foot Therefore; H = (.212)2 = .045' < .5' ok Flow in 811 outlet pipe with s=.129, n=.022, FULL pipe _ FULL pipe Q = 2.57 cfs > .36 cfs ok 3 RKR ALCONMAR =JF-T `N 7 1Q,N- VOI. U ME CRLC �S TY C Z. ca — 3� dep+h V 1S c.0 ice. = ✓� . z, . / 5a Y � � i� � i/ p't' 3^' 6 r � � L.1� P 4 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 TO: BUILDING PERMIT PLAN CHECK # 94-204 FROM: Ann Bullis, Code Enforcement Technician. DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 1994 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 1246 VIEWLAND WAY, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. APPLICANT: AL MATLOCK The applicant has. requested that the Determination of Nonsignificance which was original issued for the subdivision (P-2-82) be adopted for the subject project if possible. I have had the opportunity to visit the subject site, review the environmental checklist, and Critical Areas Determination, a copy of which are filed in the official file for this permit. The site backs Maplewood Park to the east. Two cedar trees will be removed for construction of the residence, leaving a row of mature cedar trees buffering the park from the residence. These trees will help eliminate soil erosion toward the park. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that the original Determination of Nonsignificance issued for the Harbor View Estates plat, be adopted as allowed by WAC 197-11-600. Review by Responsible Official: I concur I do not concur Comments: Jeffrey S. Wilson, AICP Date Responsible Official Attachments PC: FILE NO. 94-204 Robert Chave, Planning Manager Page 1 of 2 89p.19y Date: CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation • Engineering Letter of Transmittal December 19, 1994 To: Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section P. 0. Box 47763 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject City of Edmonds Land Use Application 94-204; Matlock Transmitting Determination of NonSignificance For Your Information: XXXXXX As you requested: For your file: Comment Note attachments: Sincerely, Jtdy A. Kenr ey, PlanningiDepartmej cc: AI Matlock CJ c/o Conrad Matlock 7016 -165th Place S. W. Edmonds, WA 98026 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR 1994 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan N CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Construction of a new single-family residence totaling approximately 4,000 sq.ft. (City of Edmonds Land Use Application # 94-204). _ Proponent: Al Matlock Location of proposal, including street address if any: 1246 Viewland Way, Edmonds, Washington Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by .1994. Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City.of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. Date: —It a3 'i Signatu XX You may appeal this determination to obert Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than C1 — 76-. � by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX . Posted on C/ - .1994, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7103 XX Al Matlock c/o Conrad Matlock 7016 165th Place S.W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Attachments: Critical Areas Determination # CA-94-126 Environmental Checklist PC: SEPA Notebook Robert Chave, Planning Manager Page 1 of 2 RECEIVED O C T 1 2 1994 CORER STAGE ELEV. +344' CMGM1AL GRADE6. / VIELLI ELEv.-3 3 3� 31 33 3 =4 3-Y EX16TMIQr GRAMS b' •9• .3' -1' -S -i' -9'-II 9 ,3 If g" I 108b9' .I 1 -----Imp-----"I-� I \ •ii t \ R Ltr' - Yi�51� �_'��3,'.)'�:-�;k '�', �y -J'y;r L: �y1.• 6 5•' 1 O , -- � { . ,Lrlit• s.� fix- 1�Y{''•H ���� 1• �'N.'� , i, •• ,a-, �ii• +�.•{.,..:.ice: •. MI ck tom% �I i\ DRI VOWAY 1 I 1 •4 ���f#- 5 �• "s�� I W-04 I tN 89'14'38" W L 1 I V. •4'-9" . I 6'i 0m' 7 LEGAL: .35m' anGM+a�. areAoes •35m W LOT •I VIMUA-A"lo' WaY iZy Viewlcu,cA \ 6,(, C467M GRAD" ALCONMAR CO 5TRUCT I Oil FILE: \ zx 81 TE PL AN m �m ,� DATE: AlacNiTeenHea. oee� eE*Q 1 11 9C,e1.E a'E�Il�iv'u« LL s EXHIBIT 5 'FILE P-2-82 FORM FOR (PA14PW6VFINAL). DECLARATION OF (919N KX ANU/NONSIGNIFICANCE) Description -of proposal Ten lot subdivision Proponent. Estate of L.E. Hubbard c/o Chester Bennett Location of Proposal 197th Street S.W. & 12th Avenue North (Lots 24 through 28, inclusive, Plat of Viewland Heights. City Lead Agency y of Edmonds This proposal has been determined to (haze/not have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (Wis not) required under. RCW.43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Duane V. Bowman Position/Title Assistant City Planner Date July 21, 1982 Signature &zulce It CITY OF r' ;9NDS ENVIRONMENTAL'ASSESSMENT PROJE'�'.yAMEHubbard's Heritage Park _ GATE SUBMITTED f'—Z gZ_ The information on. this form will be used to determine the effect of your action upon the environment -of the City of.Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible. 1. LAND Alderwood None'for buildings Area' 4.25 acres incl.*road- Soils Type gravelly loam - Limitations anticipated Description of topography (� slope)aonroximately 17% on the existing roadway and approximately 90% on north side and east side NOTE: If grading or filling will Grading: Estimated -cubic yards exceed 500 cubic yards'a grading; and.filling plan must be sub - Filling: Estimated cubic.yards mitted with the application. Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) 58,500 so. ft. Estimated -area in open-space'(pervious surface) 126,600 sq. ft. 2. WATER Stream.- Estimated flow (cubic feet per second) N/A Will stream be altered? N/A If yes, to what degree?- N/A Other water bodies" No. Impact on storm drainage Minor Method of handling runoff On -site detention facility with pollution control device. Adjacent to shorelines zone? No. Within 200-feet of MHHW? No. 3. VEGETATION Type and approximate 'number of trees Maples and evergreens, easterly third and northerly half are moderately wooded. .Minimum diameter of trees to remain.. 611 of trees to be removed 50% Ground cover Maples, ferns, berries, grass % to be removed 75% Proposed landscaping, if any -Ornamental shrubs to be placed by future home purchasers. 4. EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Multi - Vacant Family Family Commercial Other North x Park - South g East Par - West x 5. CIRCULATION Estimated increase in auto trips daily 10 D.U. x 10 A.D.T. = 100 A.D.T.'s Availability of public transportation Public transportation is available. 6. AREA OF IMPACT Neighborhood Moderate City-wide Minor Regional Insignificant 7. EFFECT.ON AIR QUALITY Short term deterioration due to construction activity. 8; CHANGES. IN NOISE GENERATION Short term increase due to construction activity Burin norma ,wor ing Eours.. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of ProponentEstate of L. E. Hubbard 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent c/o Chester-R. Bennett, 400 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Wa. 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Edmonds Planning Department 5. Name of Proposal, if applicableHubbard's Heritage Park 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: The proposal is for the subdivision of five existing lots into ten lots, including necessary utility and access improvements for construc- tion of ten new single family homes. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Subject property is located on 197th St..S. W. east of 12th Ave. N.. The site was partially developed many years ago, including lot grading. Portions of the site are wooded, other portions are bare ground and brush. 8.' Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal October 1982 9. List of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): Approval of preliminary plat, development plans (engineering) and ultimately issuance of building permits for each lot in the subdivision. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. - No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been -completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Preliminary Plat Application. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also.requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where -you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your.explanation in the space provided, or use additional,pages. You should include references to any reports or.studies of which you are aware and which are.relevant'to the answers you provide. Complete answers'to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the -permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion.may not -occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a s-tandard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apple to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the next question. B. , ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). t YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. .Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substruttu`res? X b. Disruptions,'di'splacements, compaction or overcovering of'the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d.• The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or,` off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,�or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: Development of the property will require substantial aradin for installation of utilities and roadways, and eventually the lots for home construction. Temporary erosion facilities will be used to minimize silt laden water entering the natural drainage systems. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation• Short term deterioration of ambient air quality and/or creation of objectionable odors may occur during construction activity. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount.of sur- face water runoff? X -2- YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by.cuts or excavations? X h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Explanation: Construction of roadways and new homes will increase surface water run-off and may change direction and rate of flow of ground water. Storm water detention facilities will be utilized to maintain surface water run-off at the pre -development level. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? X X d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? X Explanation: Development of the property will require removal of trees and brush typical of a single family development. Future home purchasers will introduce ornamental shrubs and lawn to the development. -3- YES MAYBE NO 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles,'fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x c. Introduction of new species of* fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: New home construction may form a barrier to existing fauna in the area. 6. Noise. Will the proposal, increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: Short term due to construction activity. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x Explanation: New home and street lighting will introduce new light and glare, typical of this type of development B. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X Explanation: The property is currently vacant. 9.' Natural Resources. Will the proposal - result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? X b. Depletion.of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: -4- YES MAYBE NO 10.- Risk of�U set. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? x. Explanation: 11. Population. Will .the proposal alter the location, n distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? x Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? x b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? x c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? x d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x Explanation: The development will ultimately introduce approximately 100 additional auto trips daily onto .12th Ave.. N....SR-524 is approximately 450 feet north of ,the proposed access road. -5- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X f. Other governmental.services? X Explanation: New home purchasers will require government services, including maintenance of the new roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water systems. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: 'New homes will require extension of the existing electrical distribution system for service, An adequate supply of electrical energy is available. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a needfor new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or'natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? X ,.f. Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: Extension or modification of existing water, sewer and electrical systems will be required for development. -6- YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result �n the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _X Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? X Explanation: 20. Archeological HHiist�orical. Will the propo a resu tl in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? X Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above -information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT: C -7- CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ar90-199 Purpose of Checklist: RECEIVED O C T 19 1994 PERMIT COUNTER The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all governmental agencies to 'consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An 'environmental impact statement _(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can. be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the, questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if'a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which. you submit this checklist may"ask-you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered`"does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions; the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read 'as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. ' A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed prrnject, if applicable: / 76 V1.CVJ0AJ WO 2. Name of applicant: A/Conmar Co . I,,c- . Al . I1 lei IoG 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: GI obec I z Pagc 1 or 22 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): J!55(ACU Cry p 1 b C r 11 1 �nmMknr�t ebn'' rucEjors OT �ii II� P.Y%l I Y�c5110n ' (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connect d with this -proposal? If yes, explain. II (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. v v J (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHXLT/10-5-93. MASTER Page 2 of 22 11. Give brief, complete description of yourproposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to -describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit. applications related to this checklist. /��o Ve-IJUA WtU% UM6JS Sf4.'11{ . Cat,Ju Inl IA,Aw��r� .4 1 . R, I• (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. (STAFF.COMMENTS) � ll b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils arefound on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Page 3 of 22 (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. (Our C)Ry►cw3 -e-xCnyat ors I can 4-wolIALr IOL- on Snm- lcuj (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clear' construction, g, or use? If so, generallly describe. O1 U Si to �CiC 'TO Ins( ..5i i Les nn ILcwt- OrOfk7QeA Site, fl once 4L- fn 4 da4 (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? -2C VJ (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 4 of 22 CHKLT110475-93.MASTER h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other (STAFF COMMENTS) to tha aarth if anv 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give ae(ppro1Lximate quantities1 Iif know (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 1j An 114 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on'or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands).? If yes, describe type and provide names. If apprn riate, state what stream or river it flows into, eS iM (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 5 of 22 (2) Will the prniect require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N� (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of `waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 6 of 22 M WV T/IOA'-Q'4. 1 A SPF,R b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. IV 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals?..; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans he systems) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and. method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water now into other waters'' if so, describe. EX't'►C� (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 of 22 f'IMIT/1(1_'1C_Oi M�ITGA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: rnc( i tr -1 o It o 11yoA PLAAOT 10 n�cJ,b��►na �r�nz-4 its (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1 1 ` 1 '1 deciduous tree: aid Cmapl , aspen, other: 2C�St. t���Aine, ��bCrc:� QreiY J evergreen'tree: fir, da pine, other: shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: %eater lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will he removed or altered". (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Now r4cA (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Pagc 8 of 32 CKKU110-25-93.MASTER (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site - birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N 0[W (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. C1 J (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources Page 9 of 22 1 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N 11 1 -- Itt �11�n an . �-� la cA(`1 [A IA 1 iGM IAA ().6ni In'Itt-5. 4 kr_. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Z7 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to redlucce, or control energy impactss,tif any:. UA1Ae,UOi1tA �iWll C�(�S�f'11C1lr�n ►i'l i�l't lna Qnc�xrP.Sr 1�.�. L?Ir` inTi lTfct�r. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. Non (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 22 CKKLT/142193.MASTER (1) Describe special eme �ency services that might be required. 5 r c>< (STAFF COMMENTS) -(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health haiards, if any: O (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Dof-s rJ 0IPA u (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would he created by or as_sociatea wun the project on a snort -term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise ' , y (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) . Proposed meTures� o reduce ►r control noise impacts, if Iny: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 11 of 22 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. �- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NC% (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures he (STAFF COMMENTS) If so, what? t e. What is the current mnin}, classification rthe S;A,it �RM,I,A ) � � ) (STAFF COMMENTS) PaP 12 of 22 CIKLT/1425-93.MASTER f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation -of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicablble�,' -*vhat is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? - (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of tl1e site been cla sified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. 'fl •1 t (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? E� All , Al ` (STAFF COMMENTS) ,j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? rb . Page 13 of.22 k. to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: n0+ OnOIu (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: D2(��U (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would he provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housin t �D .0 — ahlr c� 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Ong. m I n &41 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) CWCLT/143.93.MASCER Page 14 of 22 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest' height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) roposed? C�sshc�n Z 5 UA 0100 V . Or •c 0 =" ra CIAitn (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) a 11. Light and Clare a. What tROM, a of light or glare will the proposal produce' What time of day would it mainly occur? (STAFF COM119ENTS) b. Could li bt or glare from the finished pr(kiect be a safety harard or interfere with views? (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKU/1425-91MAS ER Page 15 of 22 C. What ''tang off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? e. 3 a ; p 6- A. (STAFF COMMENTS) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: �t'j ,1J� cl lU (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What dM ated and infornal recreational opportuniti�re in th immediate vicinity? �tts� (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses: it so, aescnue. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measurei to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided bhe project or. applicant, if any: 1 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 22 CHMT110425-91MA.S ER 13. Historic and. Cultural.Prcervation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known tq bq on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks hr. . evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to he on or next to thesite. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. V iLw 1lenJ Watt and a N (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Page 17 of 22 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project h l e? How many would the project eliminate? (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not inclu ITO driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) .water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No a (STAFF CONInIENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would he generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. �ra�ob�4 3 fa 41 �,r, os par dau (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa.-c 18 of 22 CI MT/14'3-93.MA TER g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impact-,, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. M- - I _ ,1 I 1 1. 11 J v � (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed me:l.-,ures to'reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: OZ,S T 4blo�u (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Cir 'lities currently available at the site: ectricit atural g vater efuse service telephon sanitary se , septic system, other: TV (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 19 of 22 CIIXI T/1025-93-MASTHR b. Describe (lie utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All 1.aY 'xc_S �O 6— O.C. Trnrn tqsmei in bljdi (STAFF COIVIN(.ENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted Page 20 or 22 CHKLT/10-?5-93.MASTER D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal; would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal he likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxji�c or ha7ardou suhstu or production of noise? i ��SI�Il7( u Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: �2S J lb� apt_ 2. How would the proposal he likely to affecplants, animals, fish, or marine life? eODIC Proposed nwupsures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:.. 3. How would the proposal be likely to dep)ete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or co r v I J and natural resources are: 1 CI{KLT/142r-93. MASTER Page 21 of 22 4. How would .the proposal he likely to use or affectenvironmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened.or endangered species habitat, historic historic or cultural sites, wetlands, noodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing; plans.' IJmQ i1'o Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: oc� loi' a 1 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or,public services and utilities? OAS Proposed meal es to reduce or1�respond to such demand(s) are: e j'�OI 01 � 7. Identify, if possible, whether the .proposal .may conflict with local, state, or. federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Pa.-e 22 of22 CHKLT/1042S-93. M AST G R S{eve CA FILE NO. 9 Ll - / o Critical Areas Checklist Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Addiess/Location: 2�{ i cam=land 2. Property Tax Account Number: % Z 9 S ~ 00�) 007` 0002, 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 7l0 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; -)�— no. If yes; how is site developed? 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep:, grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: fl ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway +V U floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? AS., Flows are seasonal? �g- (What time of year/ )- 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow �(—; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: - ReV OW94 CA FILE NO. 9 L% — �Cp Critical Areas Checklist Site Information .(soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) L " 'Site Address/Location: -129 Z' Pi•,operty Tax Account Number: � OoeO 007-- 0002. 3., -Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed?. 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less"than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). t Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less. than 30% ( a vertical -rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep:._ grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): , 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains .areas of seasonal standing water: N6 ; Approx. Depth: What seasons) of the year? 8. Site is' in the floodway 'b floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Nonj. Flows are seasonal? am (What time of year? ). 10. Site,is primarily: forested ; meadow; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is preseneon site: :® �3 &90 l9y_. City of Edmonds Critical Areas, Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any, potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The . information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, RECEIVED JUN131994 PERMIT COUNTER and submit it,to. the City. The City will. review the checklist, make.,a precursory site visit, and make a determinkion of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this ,f . applicant should also sub • a vicinity ma or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant shall include �Iothet pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assists'` 'staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Street Address f—ar�on�5 \NA q%02r ?y53Syz City-, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Applicant -Representative: �onfa�l I A+IociL Name r Street Address t�iArnonj_s \NA q 9037 743.02d7 City, State, ZIP Phone LPJVN1J `......) Signature Date 'nC: 18y" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425:771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report Crrtical Areas 'File. Number: CRAI- 0126 �.., �. _.... Determination Study Required Site°Location ;: 1246 Vrewland Vllay, Edmonds:` Tax Account Number 00729500000700 - ^-;::" ' :.rs.. ......,;1,.a. _ ..^.:: a- .n r r,:;r 1 •3 k„x -'. '>br 0 a ;t`� Property Owner Juan Salinas . ._. ...,':'ss:_ 5.... .. _ ,_• .F-. y, ... ... a.. ._ ._. ... .'4.,.... 'ti _., tr, '>__ 2T. Applicant Steve Waite (applicant for BLD20130605) Errtrcal Areas Present Q Geologically Hazardous:Areas:' r ? s ' Erosion.Hdzand.A46i •r,'- , a.7 :ty pi-; c - .,.-- ,;,� - a - °d r f a. �. Q'Landslide Hazard Areas= NOTE: THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE ISSUED FOR THIS PROPERTY ON JULY 13, 1994 DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY DID NOT CONTAIN ANY CRITICAL AREAS AND A "WAIVER" FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT A STUDY WAS ISSUED. HOWEVER, SINCE THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE, THE CITY'S CRITICAL AREAS CODE WAS UPDATED, REVISING THE THRESHOLDS FOR WHEN SLOPES ARE CONSIDERED CRITICAL AREAS. AS SUCH, IT WAS RECENTLY DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINS AND/OR IS ADJACENT TO A SLOPE THAT IS STEEP ENOUGH TO BE CONSIDERED A LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA AND EROSION HAZARD AREA. THEREFORE, THE ORIGINAL RECONNAISSANCE(HAS BEEN CHANGED, AND THE CURRENT CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPERTY IS "STUDY.REQUIRED" DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA AND EROSION HAZARD AREA. Site Description During recent review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a Geologically Hazardous Area (Erosion Hazard Area), pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.edmondswa.gov. . A slope is located on/adjacent to the eastern side of the property, which continues downwards onto the adjacent property to the east. This slope exceeds 40% according to City LiDAR data. Due to the degree of the slope on and/or adjacent to the eastern side of the site, it was found that the site contains and/or is adjacent to a slope that is steep enough to be considered both an Erosion Haiard Area (over 15% slope) and a Landslide Hazard Area (over 40% slope). A stream may be located approximately 130 feet east of the subject site. This distance exceeds the largest potential buffer (100 feet) plus the required 15400t critical areas buffer. Thus, the site is not subject to critical areas regulations related to streams. Allowed Activities & Exempt. Proposals Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.220. Similarly, certain development proposals may be exempt from. Critical Areas requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed or exempt activity, please contact a Planner for more information. General Report Requirements Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They alsq assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. Erosion Hazard Areas It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater, among others. Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A. In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which.are one of the Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. d Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's discretion. At a minimum, an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required. Page 12 Development is restricted within an. Erosion Hazard Area and must meet additional criteria. For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance ECDC 18.30 will be considered to meet the Critical Areas "Study Required". determination. The determination of "suitable slope stability" will be made by both the Planning and'Engineering divisions of the City of Edmonds. In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will :require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. Landslide Hazard Areas It appears that this property contains and/or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. Geologically hazardous areas include, areassusceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by alicensed Geotechnical.Engineer. The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060. In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. :p ®etermi.nat-ion: Study Required This review applies to the entire subject parcel. Depending on the location and project proposed relative to the identified critical areas, certain studies and reports may be required. Please contact the Planning Division at 425.771.0220 if and when you have a specific development proposal for this site in orderto discuss the various permits that will be required. Please note that tree removalon sites containing. critical areas may first require a tree cutting permit, and the illegal removal of trees may result in penalties and steep fines (ECDC 18.45.070, ordinance #3828). Jeri Machuga, Associate Planner October 7, 2013 Name, Title Signature/ Date Page 13 CRA19940126 This map displays LIDAR data at approximate 2-foot contour intervals. This map is for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for any action. Actual topography should be verified in the field by survey for accuracy. This map is provided with all faults on an "as is" and "as available" basis.. No warranty of any kind is given. Users of this map agree to indemnify and save harmless the City of Edmonds, its officials, officers, employees and/or agents from and against any claim, demand or action, irrespective of the nature of the cause of the claim, demand or action, arising out of any use or possession of this map. N W E S 1 inch = 50 feet 0 15 30. 60 Feet l i i I A" CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) Dick 011inger w MAILING ADDRESS 0 651 5th Ave. South CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Edmonds 774-4141 NAME Bob Champion w ADDRESS 3802 Colby U a CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Everett 259-3136 NAME Bidding ADDRESS CITY I TELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property - include all easements (show below or attach four copies) Lot 7 Harbor View Estates,, Vol. 45,, Page 72,, Records of Snohomish County a F e NEW RESIDENTIALFRI PLUMBING ADDIALTER 1:1COMMERCIAL 1 MECHANICAL REPAIR RETAINING WALL El SIGN ® ® DEMOLISH ORFILLEXCAVATE ;ENCE x-FT) P.1 swim REMODEL COMPLIANCESINSP. POOL WOOD NSERTVEI APT. BLDG RENEWAL w NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF o DWELLING 2 UNITS 1 NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) Enclosed USE '"O"PERMIT-- ZONE / v NUMBER JOB ADDRESS J/J LEGAL D CRIPTION CHECK SUB IVI-ION NOj rho LID N0. n� / TESCP PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. APPROVED BY EXISTING 40 _ REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED 4(> RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED ;" SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEW BY -1 a -a REMARKS ., n METER SIZE I8UILDING SUPPLY SIZE IFIXTURE UNITS REMARKS SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT SHORELINE N VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS HEIGHT LOT COVERAGE FRONT SIDE REAR CHECKED BY ITYPE OF CONSTRUCTION HEIGHT SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REQUIRED GROUP LOAD ❑ YES NO REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER LIBC305 VALUATION PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING ean., PLUMBING u �' 'Ir..s !tea MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days ENERGY CODE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and N successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, . f employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of 01 whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT omodify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance r nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED tion Insurance. INSPECTION SIGNATURE (OWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF ,. n EDMONDS ATTENTION 771-3202 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 'ZINA'_ INSPECTION HAS SEE`, \t,aCE INN .1oecC.`!li_ -P Irl�..4i OF OCCUPANCY HAS GRANTED. U3C CHAPTER 3. u2.3- M. APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIAL'S SIGNATURE DATE Iir:L1=P SfU Ur' IJAIE CFIGIN.1L — File YELLO`d — Inscectnr PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor U Z w w Z a Z w 0 Z Z Z a J a a Z 0 J Qi DATE: MEMO TO: Permit Coordinator, Building Division FROM: Dan Smith, Engineering Inspector ADDRESS: Z'wz- I OWNER: /'�'J�r� � After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: 1) Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS 7:OOam to 10:00pm WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS 10:00am to 6:OOpm 2) A Right -of -Nay construction permit is required for any work on City property. 3) Connection to City water system required. cl 4) Connection to City sanitary sewer':system required; obtain separate permit. 5) Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 6) Driveway must be paved a minimum of 20 feet back from City right-of-way; separate permit required. 7) Driveway slope not to exc}eed 14%. 8) Back water valve required'if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 9) Builder/Owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. Construction may not impact neighboring properties in any way. 10) No burning of construction refuse without approval from Fire Dept. 11) Street to be kept clean of debris, dirt, mud, and construction materials. Contractor responsible for dust control. 12) Inspection required on drainage system, catch basin installation, driveways, and sidewalks. A final engineering inspection is required prior to the building division granting occupancy. `• A M LAM � • r �, M ij"r Reviewed by: (initial dat ) rS PLANNING WIRR/SWR I STRELT I ENC2dRNt V 1 FIRE AMILY/MULTIPLE/CCMMERCIAL - (Circle One) BUILDING CIMCKED - Planning11711 / / // // // r' a/SFTIIACK AW. ///////// //////// /////// f� 1; / / //// / ///// ////// / NAL USE. PERMIT ////// ///////// // 2 ///////I///I// IPZAEMS CHDCKFD ////// ///////// //////// / 3 /TTF17711 TFFITI-11-17 NLNG REQUIREMSPi'S ////// ///////// /I/// 4 FVTAL FEAWRFS ////// ///////// //// 5 fpPE & VEHIC7.E ACCESS D ///////// ///////// //////// 6 / //// N ( PLAN Site) ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 7 / / / _ 3C7tIPTION Vf'RIF'ICAZ`ION r� ////// //1////// /77777777 ///////// //////// 'I 9 IM/DFDTCATIONS �y1 ////// ///////// ///////// //////// 1 10 "- f'URLIC/PRIVAZT•. LtAlett/ ? SCWER CONtJFf-TION IF NO LIDN/ 12 / / / / /II1/ )TWSTGN W_)UMEN NTS z*'7M� ///////// //////// 13 MAY CONS'PRWPION PERMIT REM 19 // 1 1 / FY)R PUBLIC IMPROV1MENPS ////// //////// ///////// //////// 15 DITION , 6 GROUND ff u) CHOCKED ////// %//////// ///////// ////// 16 T / TTiTTi 1 — MING RF�UIRM ////// ///////// ///////// 17 / / //'1 / /-17TRIIIII — GLYMER REQUTRED ////// ///////// ///////// ////////// 18 RBQUIRED ////// ///////1/ ///////// 19 -ITI-IIT177 711111711FOR DRIVEWAY READ ////// ///////// ///////// //%/////// 20 IT171-1-TI7 777777777— M. SIGN READ 21 / �� 1 ;.KING READ ////// _///////// /////'//// 22 :R AVAIIA1171,1TY RT17 ////// l%T%%% ///////// 77TI %% ///////// //////// 23 iJA'PER MAIN SIZE/f/7T� /////1/I/ 24 ER SIZE_/ 25 T/TP7 %%/% �/ %l� ,INE SIZE 2QUIRED ///////// ///////// ////// ////////// 21 777711171 ///1 / - �LZE EXISTING ///////// //////// /////////! 28 ._ / / / / INF=ION INSPECTION RBW ////// ///////// 29 1111 //////// ER C1MRGE RED ////1/ ////777Tiiil/ �5D,0 0 ,-w, CHARGE READ - SPRINKLF-R ///////// /// /// ////////// 31 TT ////// //////// ////////// 32 31 EXISTING ////// ///////// ///////// 33 / ///////// 1 34 11111f IIIT17111 / /////// — TOD' ////// ///////// ///////// 35 ///////// ///////// 36 IN F ////// ///////// ///////// 37 / / .,ED CN SITE PLAN ////// ///////// /1//////1 38 DRAINAGE MAINPAIN / // // / /// / — )PEN RUNOFr ////// ///////// ///////// 39 40 iWAr�oFwo� BY: PLANNING MGR. ENGINEERING MGR. PUBL WORKS MGR. I V a 0 :• WORKS The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............... ..... - ..................... NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS Cj LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER .................................. CONTRACTOR ................... ..................... .......................................... PERMIT NO.'��F A 3A 4 JOB ADDRESS ....s�..T ............... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... 00, .0, PWW-0001.11/75 /(R.11/78) toy* Approved: 0W. Ar 1460,S& 4 KTR. C.6"141 DATE 3.:74.79G .................. By,,Zl ......................................... �+.��; ., , fiT+=�>.•�.,'?gnJ••.:r'"z",^.`"_ci�nws...n(r*r,"''�+u.m't;.s..r^-y•`v:'�7•, ..�rPt;�*/�'nvre�.iir^ r�'�^iris.�7r�A,ve'i.+-�-V-�r.•�e',i..��t=^+I'.r<w,+�.+7�,..r...-.v...w.^2�,r;,�..-�;,-.ry-l�)-•--- •t'�"^j�v.�.."itii""',r,...ir' , .. : ��:.. , City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number. — ° i Issue Date S _,. d~ A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1246 Vi ewl and Wa %k%k GTE to place,operate, and maintain a buried service wire 18 9 9 B. Type of Work (be specific): ewl and 0 1 Way then east to a residence at 1246 Vi6wland Way. GTE to plow-40 feet -Sbd push one driveway. No toad -,push R 0 W footage uO fAet Mary A Bower, Permit Coord. C. Contractor: GTE Northwest Incorporated Contact: Dennis Alexander 771-9036 or mobile 388-1358 22118 20th Av SE, Suite 130 Phone: Mailing Address: gotbei l , WA 98021 Piar� 306 1E®8-1638 State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ® Utility (PUD GTE)WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family QX Single Family ❑ Other 2100-9P001 DB 242310 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: U Yes VJNo G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ Please see attached sketch. APPLICANT TO READ A;,N1 SIGN` INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from`njuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made`against the' City of Edmo",rorzany oj.& departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costa, and attorney fee by reason ofgranting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIA 3 O A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR k10L' OWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPPANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I ha a read=the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site, at all tim e i(n�sp n purposes. Signature: . .-i tewart Date: February '15, 1996 (Contractor or Agent) Oprns Supv-OSP Engrg. CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER ��'' DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A;Ak COMMENTS: RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT DISRUPTION FEE/FUND III: RESTORATION FEE: PERMIT FEE: d� TOTAL FEE: 3a. c RECEIPT FEE: DATE: ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments Diagram; CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: .1I PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE I ► ► I I -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - -- , LEGENli PEDS POLES O ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES I.0. UTILITY POTHOLE C) UG TRENCHING -- UGT-- 3 ► ► a' 3� .Ji R.O.W. ------------------------------ EOP -----------= - - - - -- .---------------------� " ��--�------------- M { THE FOLLOWING INFO TO BE PROVIDED m RIGHT OF WAY LINES.EOP OR FACE OF CURB, EXISTING SIDEWALK. POLES, ROAD CUTS AND THE UTILITY UNDER ROAD CUTS. ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES,(Ie:) PEDS,BOXES.CABINETS, ETC..UNDERGROUNO TRENCHING AND OVERHEAD LINES. FOOTAGE OF WORK iN R.O.W. Li PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GTE I i 1 1 I 1 1 . 1 i i I }I -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - -- LEGENIi POLES O ROAD BORES OVERHEAD LINES 1.0. UTILITY POTHOLE C7 UG TRENCHING---4JOT--- 1 I I I �I r I 1� 1 �I �1 1 ----- -- - - -------- - - - --• -- - - ----------- --_---- Ave- --#------------ F 1 .0.W. Eop THE FOLLOWING INFO TO BE PROVIDED RIGHT OF WAY LINES,EOP OR FACE OF CURB, EXISTING SIDEWALK, POLES, ROAD CUTS AND THE UTILITY UNDER ROAD CUTS. ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES,(Ie:) PEDS,BOXES.CABINETS, ETC.,UNDERGROUND TRENCHING AND OVER14EAO LINES. FOOTAGE OF WORK 1N R.O.W. . •, .,V ,. � .�.. .,�K.:Y..414.0 ..-i'L._'v;f f.L W,.v'} -�YJ PI.�JY',�"'rvt. r,.M,f"(}3iY'lifs.:,�11"RTL�9b,'•/er....1. - ..��s,. � .. .., ,K .�., ...f.�ri at,rvs... ir/„ {{•1/Y e• < 890 • 19C�v City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT . �5 '220 Permit Number. Issue Date: /D -! 1 A, of A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: ) ZyC �; p�gla hlag B. Type of Work (be specific): r, A y c LA p��1j 1n yl cj 4lgr�Ic% C. Contractor: 1 7� /on7 D©Zlnat Contact: CA+r64 Mi0ek Mailing Address: P.Q. ra J O Mil Phone: % 9-5 - 3 S L1 State License #: Dr JCS p ty 121 QG Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): 9S O02B Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family OR Other INSPECTOR: CAI O SVA'10 INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: WYes ❑No G. Size of Cut: zy„ x 7 • H. Charge $ , APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or ~employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense coats, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Vor'k and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. ' Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or`City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for in ction purposes. n Signature: �Y�C1y (�, Date: /Oh/r (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY- ell RIGHT OF.WAY DEPOSIT `� C3 TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER 2' DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 11?fr-E�� SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE J� - Ovt � (( �" L�' L�? i✓ V. PERMIT FEE -'-- TOTAL FEE:-#,3� �b 6 COMMENTS: RECEIPT EEL- G`� :7 _ DATE . ISSUED BY: �Z`"a-- NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE (� Eng. Div. 1994 .k FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments:. Diagram CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: c .4' Q'.0• -2' -4' -b' -s•-m' .ar -2'o'-4%5' W .r .e' .9 .g.1.3' .s a' -r -3' -s'-r-a'-n ELEV. -ow v 06`1' N 89'14380 W ELEv. e'-s' �- '-•-�- 1.... i 1 coR a Lc R 0 .Js. 5 = . i33 or \t= r- F ✓/ N .�. .. �J�ii 1 ��. RIM E t 3's. r ! t. v E. l ---- �/ G8*1 E.=.E 3Z3.�2. t _ CA'`) yr-s \\ E"�. i W s A o •o \ .,H3 1 I \ \\ DRIvOWAY 1 I of _; °`�"�,•.""';,,,�t�o-�1 `f^'-�,�'^��'a`4-'`-%';; �Sv r�rMr'y�'`P�';ei�v�'.,�` ` CITY OF EDMONDS 8g0.�9 az Address of Construction: 17N � y ►' ?O IAyS SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT V\bo 8 718 L ^�7 J 1 Property Legal Description (Include all easements): I nT 1 14-,r nr N111ya A�2� LEIJMON�Dg - -TREA7'MF-NT PLAIT RECEIVED --- SEP i a PUBLIC WORKS DKn, Owner and/or Contractor: I !' ►rQ• State License No. Building Permit No. T5QQZ3 Single Family ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) ❑ Commercial ❑ Public I I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. Invasion into City Right -of -Way. No ❑ Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property: No ❑ Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-8, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. oa 3s Permit Fee: 3d •�1y Issued By Trunk Charge:y� Date Issued: /-2--2—~1S Assessment Fee: Q Receipt No.: Z036 7 Lid 'No.: Partial Inspection: Date —Initial — Comments Reason Rejected: Date —Initial j Final Inspection Approved: Dat Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Gre .Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3!90 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing NEW CONSTRUCTION OWNER---------------------L-............................------------------------------.....----------- JOB ADDRESS .�..o.•••' '..�•r 4� ? ll.��... - 5 grA.3 i �'peq . 37 Fe- 3 i 3 !r''�•v c �.�OC4e.r, I , i EASEMENT NO- -------------------------------------------- REPAIRS ❑ LID NO . ................... ASMT. NO_. CONTRACTOR.................................................................................... PERMIT NO. . - ........ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO ....................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... ........................ ....................................................................................................................................... ... NAMEOF ADDITION....................................................................................................................... Approved: 9c� PWW-0001-11175 (REV.11178) DATE .. ..-.�--..-....... B ••----- -� 1442 PU E25 IN E7T2EET v_ al � 0 J � 0 > DtZIVe� 1610TH ST S. VIEWLAND WAY F� F N I. Set the stakes. rt� I +f� I • .- 0 r' Flory I.� 207-rH PL. S.W. 3. Staple filter material to stakes and extend it into VICINITY UAP NTS 2. Excavete a 4"44" trench upslope along the line of _stakes. 4. Backfill and compact the excavated soil. I E X 16T. G. 8. F I _ L_J LEANOUT GENERAL NOTES. CONSTRUCTION OF A FILTER BARRIER 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN Filter Barrier: This sediment barrier may be constructed using burlap ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND IT SHALL BE THE or standard strength synthetic filter fabric. It is designed for low RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE or moderate flows not exceeding 1 cfs. EXACT LOCATION(S) OF ALL UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS 1. The height of a filter barrier shall be a minimum of 15 inches and TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. shall not exceed 18 inches. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD 2. Burlap or standard strength synthetic filter fabric shall be purchased SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS in a continuous roll and cut to the length of the barrier to avoid CONSTRUCTION" AND STANDARD PLANS AS ADOPTED BY THE the use of joints (and. thus Improve the strength and efficiency of CITY OF EDMONDS, AND ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT the barrier). CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT. 3. The stakes shall be spaced a maximum of 3 feet apart at the barrier 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE location and driven securely into the ground (minimum of 8 inches). CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE 4. A trench shall be excavated approximately 4 inches wide and 4 inches CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENT TIME TO PERMIT deep along the line of stakes and upslope from the barrier. INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. S. The filter material shall be stapled to the wooden stakes, and 8 4. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PLAT AND CITY RIGHT OF WAY ' SHALL inches of the fabric shall be extended into the trench. Heavy duty BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE ENGINEER. wire staples at least 112-i6ch long shall be used. Filter material shall not be stapled to existing trees. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS FOR ROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 6. The trench shall be backfilled and the soil compacted over the filter material. . 6. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION ?. tfilter barrier is to be constructed aelim ditch line or swalo, COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER thehe to barrier shall be of sufficient length to eliminate and flow, DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE and the plan configuration shall resemble an arc or horseshoe with FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND the ends oriented upslope. GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTENTIAL OF ON -SITE 8. Filter barriers shall be removed when they have served their useful EROSION HAS PASSED. purpose, but not before the upslope area has been permanently atabi- lized. 7. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CORRUGATED METAL 14 GA. GALVANIZED AND ASPHALT COATED TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER, CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE, 14 GA., 2 2/3" X 1/2" CORR. Maintenance (OR PVC ASTM D-3034) EXCEPT DETENTION PIPE OR AS 1, Silt fences and filter barriers shall be inspected immediately after NOTED. s. ---• - each rainfall --and at least daily during prolonged rainfall. Any required rep irs shall be made immediately. 8. ROAD AND SIDEWALK RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 2. Should the fa ric on a silt fence or filter barrier decompose or become ineffe tive prior to the end of the expected usable life and 9. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM DRAINAGE the barrier s ill be necessary, the fabric shall be replaced promptly. SYSTEM. 3. Sediment deposits should be removed after each storm event. They 10. ALL ROOF DRAIN STUBS SHALL BE MARKED WITH 2 "X4" POST must be removed when deposits reach approximately one-half the height SHOWING DEPTH AND MARKED "DRAIN". of the barrier. 4. Any sediment deposits remaining in place after the silt fence or 11. ALL CATCH BASINS TO HAVE LOCKING LIDS. filter barrier is no longer required shall be dressed to conform with the existing grade, prepared and seeded. 3 3! 3t EL.33�i.15 34 3Co"GMP 14 GAUGE r IL loI t PVG "-2'- Z4 ' G M P OUT HOLE.75',O IN PVG GAP _N As,, NTS___. EX.12"GMP 3Z tZEMOVE AND CzEPLAGE EX1-✓T. SIDEWALK AS NEGESSAFzY TO GONNEGT SYSTEM WITH >✓X, i 5T. G• F3. AL.TEIZNATIVE , COORDINATE 013 GONNEGTION WITH GONST"IZUGTION OF DRAINAGE FACILITY ON LOT 5. LAY DiZAIN LINES PAP -ALL -EL- IN COMMON D ITGH. EXIST. SIDEWA L P-1� �-G(.,EANOUT (8 i ink M TEMPDRARY G2AVEL C0N15T2UGT10 N E• NT2ANGE ---� w � ap I /, W i / , I �� / FROM H©USE ------- DRAIN- EXACT LOCATION TO BE DETE2M I/ NE,IS i i r5Y AIZGHITEG � T •� i i ' � i i / i i i ' i \� � j V T12ENCO DRAIN 10 MIN. 1 Z 4'PVC, „GhnP SILTATION GONT20L FILTER �sV1 I L" S E P 1. 21988 Cn /G PIPE TO BE GOU PLE© yJ J > STUBS WELDED TO E- N O PLATE T. E. & S.C. PLAN FL" AND -n DRAINAGE PLAN t�'" FOR OLLINGER RESIDENCE FOR k�,10'3 CHAMPION ARCHITECTS LOT 7, HARBOR VIEW ESTATES EDMONDS, WASHINGTON I. E. -5 ?-'Z --79 - 8" Cl M P I.E. = 322.4& - 12" GMP I = 5 VEZT. REVISION MARK DATE BY :t ,I .I corner stake 344.00 (city of edmonds) N 89 14 38 W 108.69' 1 O o .,r /-------- ----- --- — --- 00 - q 45'-9" I Viewland Way LLI • / � I O o co O o 2 / building line 10'-1 1/2Z / Qo s/ '-1 ' Note: o iv wwo All eaves are 24" o 4'-1 " F,or less U.N.O.BO N / � N eave line > 30 f above grade I zo 289 sf \ HOUSE AND GARAGE - 4,088.66 sf I -0 10'-4' (garage) \.' 101 , datum = 348.50' 23'-11 1 /2" ' (concrete entry landin .1 2 25'-0" "o ` �,O ................... o� 1setback ♦ I� 0- ; ; exis ing owns ut p w 6' „ 81 -0 olo 5,_ „ \• a, ... garden . . :•`. ; existing driveway.: shed setba `,. �.• i .�;... i eave :.' - - ;::: �..... - ............ •.. •'• ' B - 47 30' :� I Note: I ,': I o trees exist in work area �►' n , I r .. �. I 1 I �: I I �. ........ , remove 811 sf of ,'...,'..existing concrete.,,... ': I to 9 ' ' ...proposed accessory:;: I driveway and replace with pervious concrete :structure:%% ;0 p 99s: I 0 :5 f I : , :�. ' as �: :: I :; �..:;:;:;:;. , `t : I ii:::::::...::::: :::: :: ;: I \ �c = 348.00'.. C = 34 .47' o cc o � N 89 14 38 W 67.00' N Site Plan Scale: 1" = 10 ft PLANNING INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OWNER JUAN and MARTHA SALINAS PROJECT ADDRESS 1246 VIEWLAND WAY PARCEL NO. t)o-+,xgS000v©'i-oo LEGAL HARBOR VIEW ESTATES BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 7 EXISTING ZONING RS - 12 CRITICAL FILES NO. CA : 94-126 LOT SIZE ALLOWED LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BLDG. COVERAGE HOUSE & GARAGE DECK SHED TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE PROPOSED COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE PROPOSED COVERAGE % A = 348.00' B = 347.30' C = 347.47' D = 348.00' Ave = 347.69' 15,710 sf 5,498.5 sf 4,088.66 sf 289 sf 96 sf 4,473.66 sf 599 sf 5,072.66 sf 32.29 % HEIGHT CALCULATIONS _ Allowed accessory height = 15.00' Ave = 347.69' Proposed structure = 14.75' Proposed Height = 362.44' Allowed = 362.69' 12 th SUBJECT 'g p P6 PROPERTY 6/26/13 pcom comment 6/26/13 plan'g.dept comment 6/26/13 p an g. ept comment Edmonds Olympic Ave Elementary Line Type Area (square feet) 1. •Naxt-Regulated tjA(Acoe ..r I,' '` W110440M Exempt I Regulated 2. Replaced 3. d.:YY: %':I %P 4. New (Post 1977) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 .O!•'S%.MiI,C<�N.(/J:I:OA':S:T.O'J:Y:Nd'%'VOF:I/Oy:Y'J//%:O9.!//.A'N.dA!��O.i?NO.p/.tY..Y,iiA,%[t Total Regulated Impervious Area Mitigation required if in excess of 2000s + l 5. F. Pr/Cw;V 6. Total Area Mitigated by Existing Stormwater Management System(s) �1':Y;Tw:Tli%:f•:T%S:.O:N•FS:.':Y:T'g(J:TAX:iif^:N:YL!/�.:i!J!fIRW%:T.:Y'6+�?J'irl;YiYXVN,;0i2�YY41'fNF%6% Regulated Area Not Yet Mitigated i = ,Wsf 7. Area Proposed to be Mitigated by Low Impact Development Techniques = 811 sf 8. Area Proposed to be Mitigated through Conventional SWM Techniques = 0 sf u_Q NO SCALE VICINITY MAP W scale NORTH CornerW,Flag�/� aet 11,c s Re r,7ir d Front (Nw) Actual -To G� �. Sides (sw,sA ._J_Q' Rear(e) Other * Per ECDC- 1Co. 10, os'o. C., �► e- r�i.r S 6�.�.k m%.X 6f- -6 S t 4, sc�t�sory 6&o:,1 d i r\q g "we--; r� less '�+� coo s. 4 4. tlCFn E;A5TId(0 00 SAIF-A-tf✓ C�5 ` b A- 5� �TOTV/ "Nothing in this permit approval process shall be interpreted as allowing or permitting the maintenance n.' any currently existingillegal, rmitted building, structure nonconforming or unpe. g, Qr site condition which is outside the scope of the ermit application, regardless of whether such b h • condition is shown on the p in uild g, structure of cod ruc site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or o condition may be the subject of a separate enforomment action." APPROVED BY PLANNING a`` 0NNO � �'a IaeJe\09eledatea he,� \ exec s,,u°e, te°°m py Oe1'I �eVO�k mbeC k ENGINEERING DIVISION AP )VEP AS NOTEplq , Date: -7 y 3 I�w�4-�,Q,l, �-w►n.�� �16��� nacded� STREET FILE RESUB JUL 16 2013 BUILDING DEPARTIMEW CI7Y OF EOWNM ;711 I EGISOI EI.�.�- , I . C. YVAI E , 7YA7E OF 441ASIiWff r U1446 hi ■ ar� to cts Member of The American Institute of Architects Edmonds, WA 98020 phone (425) 774.5533 email waitearch@comcast.net Salinas Accessory Building PROJECT LOCATION: 1246 Viewland Way. Edmonds, WA 98020 © Stephen C. Waite, AIA. PRINT SET' PERMIT SUBMITT, This document has been prepared for Permit Application and Is subject to review and modifications by governmental agencies. DATE: May 16, 2013 REV: SHEET NUMBER: A-1 ly-" CAP L o r, 7 NJ 4- Ire 3.3113 3 33 5 _ A 0 NOTE: AJOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS NOT BEEN PERFORMED. CONTOURS WERE DEVELOPED FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SPOT ELEVATIONS TAKEN ON THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM, AND ARE APPROXIMATE. NO UTILITY LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL UTILITY, CONFLICTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE SITE FROM EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION. SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN: RKR CHECKED: FROJ. ENGR.: RONALD K. RIACH REVIEW AGENCY: EDMONDS DATE: 10-9-94 I ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE MATERIAL N-1 2 ADS Sch 40 PVC SDR 35 (ASTIVI D3034) AS NOTED �y FOUNDATION GRAVEL AS REQUIRED TRENCH WIDTH 8" - 2'- 6" 10- 31- cr STORM DRAIN PIPE TYPICAL TRENCH SECTIONS NOT TO SCALE ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED "DRAIN" WITH LOCKING BOLTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY CITY OVERFLOW ELEV. TO PROVIDE DETENTION EL 39 2, 53 .4--ALUMINUM ROD, 1/2" ROUND STOCK HANDLE TO BE 18" MAX. FROM RIM WITH GATE DOWN. 1" (POLY COATED) TYPE - PIPE SUPPORTS: MANHOLE MANHOLE STEPS LOCATED 3*X.090 GAGE AT 127" O.C. BOLTED OR IMBEDDED Z' IN WALL AT MAX. 3- SPACING, MINIMUM ...--CLEANOUT SHEAR GATE PER OF TWO SUPPORTS COUNTY STD. DWG. 9-190 OUTLET PIPE 2'- cr Cc INLET PIPE MIN, IE PER PLAN IE PER PLAN 33 FR _3 RESTRICTOR PLATE W/1.53" ORIFICE NMS SHARP -EDGED SHOP DRILLED 1. NEW PIPE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS 2. OUTLET CAPACITY IS AS INDICATED IN DRAINAGE REPORT. 1 'METAL PARTS: CORROSION RESISTANT, FLOW RESTRICTOR GALVANIZED PIPE PARTS TO HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT CB .... .. . ... # 2 TYPE 2 4. OFFSET FRAME AND LADDER SO NOT TO SCALE CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP AND ACCESS SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND CLEANOUT GATE. ELEVATION AS NOTED ON PLANS s GROUT FRAME TO CATCH BASIN .00 GROUT Pil IN PLACE DUCTILE IRON FRAME AND SLOTTED GRATE CONCRETE ADJUSTABLE RISER PE 8" CAP WITHIN R-O-W UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE PRECAST CONCRETE CATCH BASIN TYPE I ICAL (I'-ICr X 2'-2- I.D.) ' o FOUNDATION GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY CITY UNDESTURBED EARTH CATC H 8ASI N TYPE 1 NOT TO SCALE RECEIVarD OCT 1 2 1994 STREET FILL PERMIT COUNTER x TA& ALCONMAR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION JOB NO. 9452 CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON BY s FILE NO. ALCON SHEET I DETAILED DRAINAGE. FOR PROPOSED RIW PERMIT NO. orso DETENTION, R V PIPING OF SHEETS ENGINEER: RONALD K. RIACH,, P.E. (206) 745-1766 16030 52ND AVENUE W. EDMONDS, WA. 98026 EXPIRES: 1 25-1995 7*} i Z-d c< - S F i2Cs /�R 4-(,o Zj)/ D ��fi IA�A C �E7 RECIZIVED O C T 1 Z 1994 PERMIT COUNTER