Loading...
128 4TH AVE S.PDFiiiiiiiiiiii 5040 128 4TH AVE S ADDRESS: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW COVENANTS (RECORDED CRITICAL AREAS : 0/ —L~7 7 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required MAV'aiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: %%i h/!%S %�/ %� - DRAINAGE PLAN DA PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENTS) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\.Sawt File Checklist.doc • 0 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: i Received of: 21390 ;' , •,!� i Phone' Proiect Loc 'on: Check No. ` /Cash Total Received $ Water Meter Size: Amount Water Connection Fee Sewer Permit/Repair Sewer Connection/LID Fee Street Disruption Fee (111 Fund) Storm Drainage Fee Engineering Inspection Fee (SFR) .Engineering 2.2% Inspection Fee (SP, Multi. Comm) Engineering Review Fees (SP, Multi. Comm) ROW/Street Use/Encroachment Permit z J Street Cut / Restoration Fee (620 Fund) v — Traffic Mitigation Fee/Sidewalk Contribution Fire Inspection Fee Fire Plan Check Fee , Building Permit Fee - Type Plan Check Fee Reimbursable Consulting Fees Critical Areas Landscape Inspection Fee (1%) SEPA Review Fee Shoreline Permit Fee Sign Installation (620 Fund) Zoning Application Fee - Type: Maps / Books Photocopies Recording Fee City Surcharge ZZ2 State Surcharge (622 Fund) ��T'I,rrEny eru W N V C ` m n rn V Cn a¢ uj ' J I 1 d- a 4. 0 cc W �o aZ —C), ZZ mNOm0 =ID V�`z Vw= Waoa ` JX3 c 0:5 0 WW�� 4 Z =N Z V J F� LL 0 WCC Mw (L- - o Received by: "' ' Permit No • • Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM 18 December 01 Kathleen Taylor Planner Lyle Chrisman, Development Services Engineer 169 Copperstone Building of 128 4'h Ave S'(ADB-01-131) The proposed application has been reviewed and is considered complete. The traffic impact fee for the project is $2200. No traffic mitigation will be required. City of Edmonds \\EdmondsfilelDATA1U SERSIchdsmanldvrwladb101-131 amem.doc Mr. Sherman Goong, PE Traffic Engineer City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Copperstone Building Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Goong, L=I"01 ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS / PLANNERS / DEVELOPMENT (ONSUQANTS May 23, 2001 LSA No. 4263 0 01 C���. ®® DEC Q 6 (#200i The purpose of this letter is to provide traffic information regarding the proposed Copperstone Building located on the west side of 4th Avenue south of Main et and north of Dayton Street. The proposed will house commercial activities and consist 1,170 s . f office area on the first floor and 11 condominium units on the second and third floors. Parking will be provided by a first floor parking structure with 25 parking spaces including two handicapped van assessable structures. Existing Street System The parking garage of the proposed building will access the alley west of 4th Avenue in downtown Edmonds. The alley in turn access south to Dayton Street and north to Main Street. Dayton is the closer to the project entrance. Dayton in turn provides access to the south through its direct connection to Edmonds Way, SR-104 and 5" Avenue. North of the project, Main Street provides access to SR 104, and 31 Avenue to SR-524 and Lynnwood. A number of the major downtown streets serve as arterial routes and are designated as state highways by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). These roadways include SR-524 beginning at the ferry terminal and consisting of Main Street west of Third Avenue and Third Avenue north of Main Street. SR-104 begins at the ferry terminal and proceeds south on Edmonds Way west of the proposed project. SR-104 provides access to SR-99 and 1-5. A spur of SR-524 begins on Third Avenue at Main and includes Third Avenue to Dayton and Dayton to Edmonds Way. Trip Generation The total number of vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project were determined using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, 1997. ITE Classification 710, general office building and ITE Classification 814, Specialty Retail Center were used to determine trip generation. As described in the ITE manual, a general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of business are conducted. An office building may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services; insurance companies; investment brokers; and tenant services such as a bank or savings and loan. The condominium contains 11 units, including a bedroom suite. This facility is expected be used by guest on an occasional basis, in lieu of staying withing the various units. No additional trips were allocated to this unit. The expected trip •generation from the proposed building is shown in Table 1. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. 19400 33rd Ave. K. Suite 200. Lynnwood, WA 98036 800-775-7663 425-775-1591 425-672-7998 fax Total Average Weekday Trips (ADT) (1�;! s of office.......................................................... 65 condominium units ........................ 64 less existing single family houses ..................................... Total 110 PM Peak Hour Trips 1,710 sf.ofoffice ........................................................... 7 11 condominium units ........................................................ 6 less existing single family houses .............................................. (2) Total 11 1. Trip rates are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition Trip Distribution The projected trip distribution for the 110 ADT and 11 p.m. peak hour trips generated by the project is shown in on Figure 1, Trip Distribution. Trip generation consists of equally of commercial traffic (office) and residential traffic. Trip distribution has been place on arterials accessing areas higher commercial and residential densities. The trip distribution indicates that more than half of the traffic will access the site via SR-104 south of Edmonds. The remainder of the traffic is expected to travel by major routes to and from north and east. Traffic Mitigation The City of Edmonds has a traffic concurrency mitigation program whereby the City has identified projects designed to maintain an acceptable level of service within the City. The project has a total of 11 net PM peak hour trips distributed onto the City of Edmonds street system. Based on the City's current policy, the traffic mitigation for ongoing projects is $200 .00 per pm peak hour trip. On this basis, the project traffic impacts are fully mitigated by the payment of $2,200.00 (11 x $200.00) to the City of Edmonds. Sincerely, EXPRRES 9103j a Dale B. Watkins, P.E. LEGEND XX% = % DISTRIBUTION XX = AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIPS XX = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS EOMONDS KINGST Oiy Jan C� Al J / / / E-00 Jr J! � J � is o w i° it is J: ' EDMONDS_CITY LIMITS WOODWAY CITY LIMITS CASPERS ST ii i � 2oz •.. 2 J' O �oz 2s 530 MAIN ST DAYTON ST 607. 109. 66 �� 7 � WALNUT ST � N � > HOLLY DR a a a o = HOMELAND DR a: n PINE ST. HEMLOCK WY SEAMONT LN 04 a NET TRAFFIC GENERATION NET WEEKDAY ADT................110 NET PM PEAK HOUR...............11 COPPERSTONE BUILDING NET TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION MAP FIGURE NO. 1 LSA No. 4263 City of Edmonds UtlabW6 9 lun� Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant W, Name Street/Mailing Address Pd vn Li A - City State Zip Applicant Contact Person: Name Street/Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone: !Z :Z& - /5J7L Telephone: Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Telephone: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS Contact Name E-mail: Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated 1 and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) II. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: / 07 � 7 ""I A-Ple c_) • Pl k 16 ;_ ttach a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: c. Specify proposed type and size of development: cSalwL_- lann �,� _ (# of residential units and/or square footage of building) Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 1 of 5 d. Date construction will begin and be completed: e. Define proposed access locations: f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the. City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe 'channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50 % 95 % Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: ' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. ITE Land Use Category Per Unit Fee Rate New Use 4q Prior Use $ Units in square feet, # of dwelling, of , etc. X fA A, f. _ X1 1 ' 1 = New Use Fee: $ - Prior Use Fee: $ _ ❑ NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, of , etc. New Use $ X = ❑ OTHER MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 + consultant fee $ TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ Engineering Division Approval Date ' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 City of Edmonds Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Name � (/ 7 l `�� j q % L, GU Street/Mailing Address City State Zip Applicant Contact Person: 614� -Za �a) Name Street/Mailing Address City Telephone: 4%5 — 131 -3 Y,;5 ;;L Telephone: Traffic En gin r who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Contact Name Telephone: E-mail: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS State Zip Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated 1 and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) II. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: C51// k �Q a - a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: 15Vot ckl D c. Specify proposed type and size of development: .5 QCL,) SGt�DY) (# of residential units and/or square footage of building) Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page I of 5 d. Date construction will begin and be completed: e. Define proposed access locations: f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model. 1 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): ' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.1 a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: 1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. ❑ CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. ITE Land Use Category Per Unit Fee Rate New Use 1 Prior Use ��Q .13 X X Units in square feet, # of dwelling, of , etc. i zo New Use Fee: $ - Prior Use Fee: $ _ $ ❑ NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate # of dwelling, of , etc. New Use $ X = ❑ OTHER Fee MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 + consultant fee $ TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ 0 City of s, Engineering Division Approval 9 ' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 • ' PLANNING DATA • 11 STREET FILE -- Signs -- Name: FS C( _ Date: Site Address: Av�e- S : Plan Check #: BLD-200V - �! Z S Project Description: UJCVUSI `� S Reduced Site Plan Provided: ( / NO) Zoning: 2- Comprehensive Plan Designation: 0 WA O V-1A GMWC( ' Map Page: ©-2, Corner Lot: (YES Flag Lot: (YES J to ADB File # (or date waived): Ad (^ � r .0 V at TOTAL Area per Type of Si n Allowed in Matrix Allowed TOTAL sign area Proposed Type of Sign zone? conditions met? area per unit_ .. Unit allowed for sign area this sign Example wall w/internal illumination Yes, with conditions Yes i sq. ft./lineal ft. attached 41 ft. attached wall 41 square feet 20 square feet wall Sign # 1 Of Sign 92 (I d eL�(o (I Sign #3 TOTAL Sign Area f t/Site Max Permitted: [Previous Total: Proposed Total: 5i Height Sign Type: Q C Max Permitted: c Actual Height: A/ / Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sin Lighting Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: PLANNING DATA STREET FILE -- Signs -- Sin Colors Proposed: (� I PA // (1� 0 C � U Ck t^ mil Acceptable? S Requires ADB Approval? /IAD Sin Location If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks? Required Setbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: Landsca ing for Freestandin Signs Size: Location: Critical Areas Determination #: ❑ Study Required ❑ waiver Other Plan Review By: /7 l I Z � % 7 a a City of Edmonds PERMIT NO: 9726 SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT EXPIRESOKlbf/if I Address of Construction: LID # Property Tax Account Parcel No. :'s` OZ4- 047C Attach copies of all access and utility easements d Approved by Owner and/or Contractor: Contractor License #: )fmmi� :o ❑ Single Family Multi -Family (No. of Units ❑ Commercial (No. of Units ) f ❑ Publi�-, Permit #: Z01t50 Z` Invasion into City *Right -of Way: Yes ❑ No *RW Construction Permit Cross other **Private Property: ❑ Yes ❑ No **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. Owner or ctz r sknVtur a d acknowFe'dgement statement: By signing permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. tf PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE t- White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bldg;forms;sspermitj Ig4100 I as Date i RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk. 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 CONFORMED COPY 200304160294 3 PGS 04-16-2003 09:32am $21.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Reference #: d10D - Dxl tl Grantors : 1 � ,1 e� () ()�L-'G�r (2)- ��� �f1 F (� Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 23 Twn 1-1 ^i Rng `S a" Qtr OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (I)T-'-21 - 0'5+-047-oo (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned WHEREAS, r! 6�ijL'�,Q• it i` f are the owners of the following described real estate' in the City of Edmonds, to wit: Property Address:__ ,43,judr Sr.�lrti Legal Description: llrfttlftp Qh5W7— rA/F. 98ozo Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s): Z'5ZI - o-z4 - o q,7 - oo S%V-'1- 0z,+-6+B _00 AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING Citv of Edmonds By: _Date**99 Page __-___L__ of WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than Ft(At-IT units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. �^ DATED t ' U� day of ` 20 G y�V\ I GOR n %� GRANTOR State of Washington ) ' )ss County of 1l S �j 1 certify t I kn or ha satisf ctor evide ce that �. (is/ the persons) who ap eared before me, and said perso s acknowledged that (he/she they) 'Signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/sh they) is/0e)uthorized t.o execute theinstrument and acknowledged it as the (title) of t -1 'Di7_5r ' 1 to be the free and volmnary act of such party(ies) for the use14 purposes enti sin this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 20 Notary Public in And for the State of Washington. My commission expires AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING City of Edmonds B)':Date��[�� Page _�_ of J L ATEM M U ILD 1 N GTORM S\RESTRI CT ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER: 2327-034-047-00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 2327-034-045-00 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EA5T, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DE50RIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT 15 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH. STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WE5T 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE G I TY OF EDMOND5 BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1782213 IN 5NOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HIN6TON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EA5T LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT 15 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF 5A I D SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT 15 PARALLEL WITH AND 1.05 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF 5A I D SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE E5T LINE OF 4TH 5TREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG 5A1 D WE5T LINE A D I5TANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LE55, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. OCCUPANCY GROUP: 53-(PARKIN6 GARAGE) RI -(RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS) FIRE RATINC75 SEPARATIONS: BETWEEN 53 4 RI: I -HOUR 5PRINKLERED ft 0 • PLANNING DATA . 2-� New Commercial / Mulffamily Proiects J.-%r ADDRESS: ZONING: E(S) PROPOSED: NIXe-d GYnl I resld ALLOWED?: 64eS LEGAL NONCONF RMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/�1Qj�' CUP File: N To Allow What Uses?: FILE M ®O — f 3 � 02A-RKING: Use: 12�S I d . V-+" 4No. Spaces Required: �- X (floor arhpoces #-Vmployees, etc.) = G �. Use: e- rio ov+- �S'rNRequired: l O X'- ZZ " ram' � (floor area, # employees, etc.) = Use: ! _ No. Spaces Required: _ ` (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Use: No. Spaces Required: X (floor area, # employees, etc.) _ Total Required: 113.% 4/4 I9. Actual Provided: ✓ BACKS: , Required Setbacks: i Front: Left Side: -Right Side:Rear: —8-- Actual Setbacks: Front: 0. �5 Left Side: D.5 Right Side: �,�� 'Rear: ®•S � Street map checked for additional setback required? /6V}e/No) } AXIMUM FLOOR AREA: Maximum Allowed:_ 3 Actual: G- a ' UILDING HEIGHT - Maximum yl , Maximum Allowed: �D 2-S -1- S Actual Height:_ D Modulation Allowed?: Modulati,,_ He�i htoon rS4`ba°u�f:G� Datum Point: "-(nL•35 ' Elevator Penthouse > 3 f6get over height limit? /,/0 If VAR#- z a NDSCAPING: z : a Matches A_ DB approvgd: w Bid Provided? Bond Amount (100011 bid): 35-0'9 . a�- ~' ' CRITICAL AREAS #:_ D WGtI r/a-Y—S SEPA DETERMINATION: 12&r�> Poo c��S w z ' SHORELINE REQUIRED?: NO Continued ... I:\I ibraryk^P IandatNewComm.doc 1,9/9/©'o- • 0 DATE: �3/2%OZ PLAN CHK#. 2 - Z'1 NAME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: efef PROJECT DESCRIPTION:_®-f��c'ne, ADB FILE #: _ �� OR DATE WAIVED: PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN: l% SU DIVISION: $ LOT GREGATIONJkEQUIRED?:' v is REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROVIDED FOR STREET FILE? as OTHER: z a a m Plan Review By: a 1: \I i brary\^P 1 an datNewComm. d oc e 0 as Key bps arby he nearest: ges nonds for: - — MMIIIIIIIIIII11mm", 2,, 021 COPPERSTONE BUILDING Location: 128 4TH. AVE. S. Edmonds, WA 98020,-US -Tpucv- PLAN o T "�q Location map qj,�ey,,- Local! CUOCING ON ~ WTLL.- C Zoom In (0- Re -center (-: Move Location AMUONAL MAP FMTURES- Cus?or-i-Ze N-la,-,: Addi L4 v.map-quest.com/maps/map.a,dp?zoom--9&mapdata=xU4YXdELmBP/`2fa838YD. jiV 1. BULDING DEF1. 0 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The CriticaljAreas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled otit by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed; to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). • RECEIVED A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this. Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the info ion a d efi lbits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to fill s a li do on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE •L •�( Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and pl�,tirt attendant t}yppplicatitp. SIGNATURE OF OWNER Owner/AsiWcant: Name 14,00 Street Address City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): M/A DATE Applicant Representative: f3�rl���i ac5r4-v✓ 0�41,0, Name Street Address Gp'tiv r�l�5 ► 4 k- 78o'ly City State Zip Telephone: tt1f, '7—P5 : Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 *Critical Areas Checklif CA File No:_0 i-15-7 Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegettion) 1. Site Address/Location: P-k8 ANC At/9. -- -- wz�Ndonsi25 lt4t_ Is& 7.o 2. Property Tax Account Number: Z �)L , - 0 3 L4 - C) •l c)() 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):�'"1(j 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes; .—no. If yes; how is site developed? 4A104-C r�iL-v' 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Ak21'14f ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: NoAt!" ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? ^ CAA__ 8. Site is in the floodway Alb floodplain 140 of a Water course. 9. Site contains a creek or, an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? 4/A- ., Flows are seasonal? �► What.time•oRyear? A/ A ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ;mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No For City Staff Use Only -R- s=° 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? ►J 2. Site is Zoned? IAG 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? AtOQ,ewn.,,n c Q au-21 N.? S C-1h 00 QXXA-jQls: V � o`�- D/ng ,:�;5, 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? is n 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? jo DETERNHNATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by: _ — nt),, o " Da1w- - rA T,- _ c� Critical Areas Check] ist.doc/3.19.2001 P SkASTc:H wBST du an, 4 TEt ay.P som �mz�w eon►p�a�NT �r1? UaF' 31I*113 1 �rlAIE '�UP,�1Q V�td�l�5 � ►JTOKI57'MA3, �. CRLLEO M4- 1I0 61B ' IA NID �V ' zg 'ZZ( 6p#f4f mT Yvuow CuQfb ``N0 PAS' Ac, beTweleV SIGN5 97 5 PRINTED BY THE STANDARD REGISTER COYWVtY. U.S.A. 21PSET(& Phoned You ❑ Is Waiting ❑ Was Here To See You WAS TOLD YOU /�i%� ■AWAY FROM OFFICE ■PLEASE RETURN CALL El OUT •• ■ • • AT THE MOMENT WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU ■BUSY ■ RETURNED YOUR �m; 0 OAF / _ r ��i��� - -- / .N TAKING ITIAL HERE 00 S`:�_`EET IFILE ' SIGNEDFILE � ii I_ APPLICATION for The Cityof Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION E) REPAIRS EASEMENT No . .......................................... � 101-08900 OWNER................ S1++.anaan......S.-A...... ................... -----................ .......... CONTRACTOR--------......------...............---...------••--•----------•--------........................... PERMIT No....................... ADDRESS 128 4th Ave. s-..................................................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No............................................... BLOCK No. ........................ •................ NAME OF ADDITION ........ Dye.: -,,Tested On Sewer June, 1972 d: Approve DATE................................................ By......---------.........----••--•---••-•--............................ (Ct"tp of (1b oub DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS 0:trtt"ft'Ftatt -lot. (9 ;a4kilt PER International Building Code Section 110 128 - Occupancy established by this certificate: I Dwelling Units: N/A B on: VA Maximum Occupant Load (Per IBC 1004) Room capacity signs, when required,!must,remain posted at all times. No. Stories: 1 Basement: N/A Owner of Building: The Copperstone Addr4ss/Te-nant Space:. 128 4" Ave S. #101 THE Copperstone Suite #101 HAS BEEN INSPECTED -AND APPROVED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2003 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE -AS' -ADOPTED BY THE'CITY"FOR THE GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED. Issued this 21st day of ' • December, 2007 CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL BY: x�&WAPV) This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or obscured and shall be maintained in legible condition at all limes. Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. A' 1•. 'M K' • A• • •AS. •M •A• • M• •P.• • •<.• q• . .1• A• • •A•. •t.•. A:. .p. • q. .p. • •'�• . p• - q• .r • • �. • .ti. • A• �1t%:� 1UUJ =�1►/i i:11Vli sue: U1Y�i :UY%i Ulll�i °i °�11Vli s:i �1�li 311E �11P1i/i JlliGG �IIl!i �1U'l!ii� �1�li 111�i �1VG '!i �111fli 111�l1EM 4k� o4 ED14• N CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: A mixed -use building to include 11 residential condominium units and 1,600 square feet of office space with an underground -parking garage. The proposal will require approximately 2,000 cubic yards of grading. Proponent: City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: 128 & 1•30 4t' Avenue South Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and mitigation measures have been adequately addressed ,0 the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158. or mitigation measures have been included as part of this determination which alleviates any probable significant adverse environmental impact. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official: Kathleen Taylor Position/Title: Planner Phone: 425-771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than January 31, 2002, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on January 17, 2002, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. � 7 17 ADB-01-131 DNS.DOC 1/17/02.SEPA TREFT BILE UIL®IN0"�- 0 • Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section XX Applicant/Agent: Butterfield Design Group Department of Ecology Attn: Colin Winters P.O. Box 47703 ' 400 Dayton St, Suite C Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Edmonds WA 98020 XX MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: 1. THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT $2200 FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES. THE FEES ARE CALCULATED AT 11 TRIPS IN THE PM PEAK HOUR X $200 PER TRIP. Attachments pc: File No. ADB-2001-131 SEPA Notebook Page 2 of 2 ADB-0I-I31 DNS. DOC I/17/02.SEPA CITY COPY COPPERSTONE BUILDING. 128 FORTH AVENUE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 BUILDING OWNERS MICHAEL ECHELBARGER AND BRAD BUTTERFIELD 400 DAYI'ON STREET, SUITE C EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 425.775.0564 ARCHITECT BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP 400 DAYf ON STREET, SUITE C EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 425.775.0564 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A THREE STORY MIXED USE CONDOMINIUM/ OFFICE BUILDING WITH A 20 STALL SECURE PARKING GARAGE WITH AN ADDITIONAL 3 STALLS LOCATED AT THE ALLEY ON THE NORTH END. THE BUILDING SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 30,126 S.F. AUGUST, 2001 S.E.P.A. Note: The following continues after the cover page, which makes reference to the Project name, Applicant and the Contact person. 4. Date checklist prepared: August, 2001 (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Apply for building permit approximately October 1, 2001./�- (STAFF COMMENTS) Gr 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approval of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit and ADB approval / (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. A three story mired use condominium/office building consisting of two floors of residential area approximately 19,528 square feet above a ground floor area approximately 10,598 square feet consisting of two office spaces and a 23 stall parking garage. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps of detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 130 Fourth Ave. Edmonds WA 98020 " That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 23, township 27 north range 3 east, Willamette meridian, described as follows: Commencing on the west line of 4`h street at a point that is 120 feet north of the northwest corner of the intersection of 4`h street and Dayton street; thence west 126 feet, more or less, to the east line of said alley to a point that is 105 feet south of the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter, thence east along a line that is parallel with and 105 feet south of the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter to the east line of 4'h street; thence south along said west line a distance of 40 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Situated in the county of Snohomish, State of Washington (STAFF COMMENTS) ZS 3 `�f" �' ` TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other: 0 • • 0 Slopes down from Fourth Avenue to the alley. (STAFF What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Elevation change from 62.75' to 57.75' = 5.00' over a distance of 136' . This results in a slope of 3.6 percent. (STAFF COMMENTS} What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. No agricultural soils found on the subject property. Developer will provide geo- technical report with this submittal. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 2000 cubic yards of filling will be required to be removed so as to adjust surface elevations to accommodate drainage and parking garage access. Consistent with Community Development Code: City of Edmonds Environmental Section: soils and topography, grading and filling on the site will proceed in accordance with the following policies: r in will not jeopardize the stability of any slope or of any adjoining property. Temporary erosion control measures will be undertaken to reduce erosion during construction. C(STAFFC0 uld erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No temporary. erosion control methods shall be undertaken to protect the integrity of the adjacent properties. MENTS) t✓ Q S Vl t� CDYI G�✓� Gt 1r Gt g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt of buildings)? 100 % of site is impervious surface. 1 n3 2. AIR (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Drainage protection is proposed around the building and development areas, with the use offoundation and roof drainage systems that empty into a tight lined storm system. The storm system will be tied to the existing system in the alley. Erosion protection of the exposed soils areas will be achieved through containment of potential runoff on the site or on adjacent property. All erosion control measure imposed by the. City of Edrnonds Engineering Department will be followed (STAFF COMMENTS) a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Possible dust during construction, no emissions after the project is completed other than that from automobiles. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce of control emissions of other impacts to the project, if any: N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. • • 5 0• (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Based on the February 19, 1986, Flood Insurance Rate Map no portion of the project lies within the 100 yearflood plain. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve and discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) 00 6 00 (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals of humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The principal source of water runoff will be rainwater and snow melt from roof, parking, and landscape impervious surface. Storm water runoff will be collected in a series of catch basins and underground pipes, and conducted to a detention system, which will discharge into the existing alley storm sewer, which will eventually discharge into the Puget Sound (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Typical components of storm water from impervious surfaces such as roads and parking areas and are petrochemicals, automotive waste products. In the completed project, storm water runo from impervious surfaces on site will be collected in the catch basin collection system and treated will oil/water separation before being routed to the adjoining storm sewer system for eventual discharge into the Puget Sound Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Edmonds (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: During construction, temporary measures will be employed to control runoff and water quality, including appropriate water management practices. In the completed project, oil/water separation and detention will control impacts of runoff form impervious surfaces, including those subject to vehicle uses. (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. PLANTS is7 0 • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X Shrubs X Grass _____pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: Other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping, which will meet the Edmonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping, which will exceed the Edmonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. ANIMALS a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring shellfish, other: X None (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. is 8 Joe (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical lighting and Gas appliances. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What.kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This project will meet all of the requirements of the State and Local energy codes. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None. is 9 0• (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project (for example, Traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: 7jvpical construction noise during construction hours. Long-term: Normal routine traffic on Dayton and Fourth Ave. S (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Currently the site is vacant. The adjacent property to the North is a small commercial business. The adjacent property to the south is a commercial bank with on site customer service. • • 10 (STAFF COMMENTS) 2 S t In arl P- 00 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? if so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Describe any structures on the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None. (STAFF CO ENTS) d4j2::�, 0 P1—� a4i e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? BC: Community Business (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? BC: Community Business (STAFF COMMENTS) /�ll� �i. a3e-, C g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) y�ozc�C� h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25-35 00 11 0 • (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Twelve upper middle to high -income units shall be provided (ST b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 2 �S Ole-r_C— �' 1 mi VtGt c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. AESTHETICS • 12 . • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? 25' above average datum to top plate with a maximum S'sloped roof. The principal exterior element shall be wood siding. — p (STAFT COMMENTS) j �o f /-4-sI b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Approval of aesthetics by the Edmonds Architectural Design Board required to continue this project. (STAFF COMMENTS) IL . LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Wall mounted exterior light fixtures (decorative) on photocells. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. .. • • 13 • • (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City parks, Puget Sound, city recreation center, private athletic club. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. • 14 � • (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The public street at the project is 4`h Ave. S. and The alley between 4`h Ave. and Yd Ave. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the nearest public transit site is I block north on Dayton street. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 23 parking stalls shall be provided The existing site has no parking areas. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The developer to install a new City sidewalk the length of the entire project property, per City design standards. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. • • 15 � • Please see attached for Number of vehicular trips. (STAFF S g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Sufficient off-street parking will be provided reduce congestion within the project and traffic movement signs will be provided to control movements where necessary. Mitigation payments will be offered to the City of Edmonds and Washington State Department of Transportation for impacts to surrounding roadways as necessary. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Normal fire and police protection shall be required. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The project shall meet or exceed all current fire code requirements for a new building (STAFF COMMENTS) 16 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical. Snohomish County PUD Telephone: Verizon Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy W-' { /ewer System: City of Edmonds Sewer System (STAFF COMMENTS) 17 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true to the best of my owledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to a its decisio Si afore o oponent Date Submitted 17 !<� � rr ✓t�v d��2ooZ. D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposal measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 4. How would the proposal be likely to use of affect environmentally sensitive areas of areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Cs -:�t / Sr 130 4th Ave ec Ov N-N� Zoning and Vicinity Map t Attachment 1 File No. ADB-2001-131 • RETURN ADDRESS: CONFORMED COPY City of Edmonds, City Clerk 200304160294 3 PGS 1215th Avenue North SNOHOMISH3COUNTY; WASHINGTON Edmonds, WA 98020 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Reference #:__ Grantor(s): (1) 2 ( ) �e!Gj Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 'LS Twn V7 4 Rng `E� E Qtr OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) ZSZ7 v'--- 011- 00 (2) • Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not et assigned Y g WHEREAS, are the owners of the following described real esta .e in the City of Edmonds, 10 wit: Property Address: %280 4%4BPJU4E Sarlrt� �� W4. yaazo Legal Description: SOM I_Tr4twap sdew_ i Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # (s):.2.12-1 - 0`34 - 0 qq - oo _00 AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING Citv of Edmonds Page �_ of is • WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named owners do hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -wit: That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on subject property containing more than 1.1(APT units. Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs, successors and assigns. N DATED t ' � day of f 206 GRANTOR State of Washington ) • County of 1ds I cerG fy Oat I kn or ha satis ctor evide ce that (is/ tepersons) who ap eared before me, and said perso s acknowledged that (he/she theygned this instrument, on oath stated that (be/sh tbey) is/ e) uthorized to execul' the 'instrument and acknowledged it as the (title) of 6Lw I-DV13 4 to be the free and volhrm.ary act of such party(ies) for the use$ purposes enti s in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11 day of 200,4— r Notary Public in hnd for the State of Washington. My commission expires tp' R F THORIZED FOR RECORDING City of Edmonds Date_-�%� [e �_ of 3 UkTEMM U ILD I N GTO RM SMESTRI Cf 0 • • • ASSESSOR'S TAX NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 2327-034-047-00 2327-034-048-00 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, KI-LAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOY45: COMMENCING ON THE 16E5T LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT 15 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH. STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 12(6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1782215 IN 5NOHOM15H COUNTY, WA5HINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT 15 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG. A LINE THAT 15 PARALLEL WITH AND 1.05 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE E5T LINE OF 4TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WE5T LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. OCCUPANCY GROUP: 53-(PARKING GARAGE) RI -(RE51 DENTI AL APARTMENTS) FIRE RATINGS 5EPARATION5: BETWEEN 53 4 RI-: I -HOUR 5PRINKLERED C7 i ' FRS{ EW1W41ENTF L ASSOCIATO C PINE NO. : 1 425 4555 2316 • Feb. 21 20M 11:555AM P1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1380 -112th Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 801ievue, Washington M04 (425)465-9025 (425)455-2316 Fax FAX MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21, 2003 FROM: Diane Spahr TO: Mr. Colin Winters FAX NO: 425-m-5746 TOTAL PACES mmwmocomamru IT If you have dif8ctdty receiving this information, please contact us at (425) 4554025. SUBJECT: Here Is s copy of the second report regarding the excavation of the contminated soil and subsequent testing. if you have any questions, please feet free to call. FEe 21-2W3 fRr 11:49AM 10: ocr-C. 4 FtZ )k : .EJUIRXMML ASSMIA PHDE NO. : 1 425 455 2315 • Feb. 21 20M 11:56AM P2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. s 1380 - I W Amn Warawas% Suite Soo BdkWe4 wW1tWM 98004 (425) 43MMS Otte (sae) 03-5394 Toll Pm (425) 455-2316 Fax -- October 9, 2002 W. Kirby Owens Hammetworks 400 Dayton Street, Switc C E&ooads, Washington 98020 Subject: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE ASSESSMENT Re:identlat Property 130 Fourth Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Dear W. Owens: JN 22045-1 Envy onmental Associates, Inc. (BAI), has completed an assesamentofsoil conditiona m the vicinity of an tmdergemund beating oil tank which was tmnoved from the sits by others in the summer of 2001. In aMtioa, we conducted sampUng and tasting of soil from an area to the south of tho Ec►rmt r UST whore approximately ten (10) gallons ofheating oil was reportedly spilled in the course of the UST removal. This rcpott, prepared in accordance with the terms of our pxgmal dated October 1, 2002, summarizes our Approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are Emended solely for your use and the use of your r+upres tivas. Four (4) copies of this report are being distributed to you. No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior written approval. EXECtlT w SUMMARY On February S, 2002, I1+li: Ryan Bixby ofM obscayed the excavation of soil from the sidewalls and floor of the former UST hold and from the area to the south of the UST bold whose soil appeared to have been impacted by the iealcing tank after it was removed by others. Results of sampling and testing of soil conducted at that time indicated that pKtrolcum-contaminated soil remained beneath the floor of the former UST hold and to the south of the fmmrr UST in the vicinity of the omficial release. Ai0048 Ofiioer O,dgOa I Sn Fnw- f6wo Bay Area FEB-21-c-M FRI 11:50AM IUt CIO=-= 5- 7-03; 1:27PM;Teylor i Gregory . I FiOM : -EW IRO 4MAL MMIRTAC PFDNE NO. : 1 425 455 2316 Feb. 21 20M 11: 56AM P3 .. H"UWrworka JN ?J04M Odober 9, 2M2 ,Page - 2 4W On October 25d and 3' ; 2002, M returned to the site and observed the excavation of approximately onahundmd and twenty-five (125) tons ofpctroleum-conta urinated soil (PCS) flvm the subject site. The PCS was excavated from the floor of the former heading oil tank hold and from an area to the south of the format UST where the surficial release reportedly occurred. The tank hold excavation extended to a depth of sppmwmately tea (10) feet beneath ground surface and was approximately fifteen (15) fat by twelve (12) foot wide at the ground surfica Petroleum - soil was removed to a depth of $pproumately seven (1) feet beneath ground =face in the southern excavation. The emtsminatod soil was stockpiled on visqueen and later loaded into trucks and transported to a thertnal desorption treatment facility in Everett, Washington. Results of sampling and testing of selected soil samples collected from the floors said sidewalps of the finer tank hold and the southern excavation confirmed that soil in theca areas is now compatible with cwrW WDOE Method A cleanup levels for diesel -range petroleum contaminants. Relying upon the results of sampling and testing completed thus far, it would appear that no additional action with regard to soil would be required by local, state, or fedwal agencies. We appreciate the opportwuty to be of service on this assignment. If you have any questions or if we may be of additional service, please do not hesitate to contact us. gespoctMy submitted. MOUONMBNTAU Don W. Spencer, M.�, P.G., RE.A. Principal Registered Site Assess ILicenscd UST Supervisor State Certification #9474S8636 License: 604 Lic eaw 11464 License: 876 License. 5195 License: 0327 (Washington) (oresa) (California) (minis) (Nlississiprpi) ENVIRONMNNTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB-21-c003 FRI 11:50W I0: ��'� FROM FNUIMO MTAL ASSOCIATED C PFME NO. : 1 425 455 2316 Feb. 21 2683 21:57AM P4 Raidentini Property 130 Fourth Avenvc South Edmonds, Washington Prepared for: Mr. Kirby Owens Hamm erworks 400 Dayioa Street, Snits C Edmonds, Wasbington 98020 Questions regarding this investigation, the cowhisions reaahad and the recommandatioans given should be addreavA to one of the following undernigaed. . Lou &- - Ityan K. ixby HydnogeologistfP oject Manager WDOWRegistcrod Site Assessor Don W. SpeUcar, c., P.O., R.E.A. Principal WN :3pr Registered Site AssmmiLicensed UST Supervisor State CortiHcatbm #947458636 Lima= 604 (Washington) Lioense:11464 (Oregon) :. License: $76 (California) 110onae:5195 Mlinois) Lieenso.0327 (Mississippi) Reference Job Number: JN 22045-1 FEB-21-2003 FRI 12:52AM I0: October 9, 2002 city of edmonds development information ® ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE REC'D BY ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE RECEIPT # ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT El HE Cl STAFF ❑ PB ElADB El cc ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION 128 & 130 4 th Avenue S , Edmonds PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) Copperstone Building PROPERTYOWNER Brad Butterfield PHONE# 425-775-0564 ADDRESS 400 Dayton Suite C E-MAILADDRESS Butterfield Design @ Home FAX# 425-776-5746 2.327-034-047-00 TAX ACCOUNT# 2327-034-048-00 SEC. 23 TwP. 27 RNG, 3 East DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE Mixed use condo/office building with office space located @ alley level with 23 stall parking garage. Also consisting of two floors of residential units, totaling 30,126 square feet. APPLICANT Butterfield Design Group PHONE# 425-775-0564 ADDRESS 400 Dayton Suite C E-MAILADDRESS Butterfield Design @ Home FAX# 425-776-5746 CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Colin Winters PHONE # 425-775-0564 ADDRESS 400 Dayton Suite C E-MAIL ADDRESS Butterfield Design @ Home FAX## 425-776-5746 The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or, employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this pli at' on khe behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT 1 �a O DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that Ii have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER;::5 —/ DATE o i I This application formlwas revised on 1/27/00. To verify whether it is still current, call (425) 771-0220. LALIBRARYTLANNINGTorms & HandoutsTublic Handouts\Land Use Application.doc RECEIVED ' City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax• All; '7'71 All The CriticalAreas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled odt by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to :complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: " " 11 . ' `--' City Receipt#: Critical Areas File #: -01 .3 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or • incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my sign4ture, I certify that the info ion a d efi ibits herewith submitted are true and convect to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized t:�M a li ti'o on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE l • i l .�%[ Property Qwner's Authorization u " By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and po attendant t},�pplic io SIGNATURE QF OWNER Owner/ pP1'cant•4 Name Street Address e Dodo/, W 4- 16ou City State Zip Telephone: Email address (optional): _ WA DATE Applicant Representative: f3�rT �i�ye5✓4vy 42i 44a Name Ycri Street Address 4VI-11 �a "05 y►k- i8o-Zo City State Zip Telephone: kfl-f. '7 75' eJ5-6 f/ Email Address (optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: c1 6) ` Site Information (soils/topography/ hydrology/ vegegtion) Site Address/Location: _``'',,��,,�i'fH P2. Property Tax Account Numbenutol o - 1 _d_52_ � - o 5 q - OL4 - 00 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):. q177! 1W. /zf' 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes;.— no. If yes; how is site developed? 4AMfi-e- ��iL-,' e74^TZ-T0 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% '(a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth: _ What season(s) of the year? Nn^t= 8. Site is in the floodway /%/b floodplain 144 of a Water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? "Flows are seasonal? (What.time-of6year? 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ;mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No For City Staff Use Only ? • �O 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? ►J 2. Site is Zonedf i3G 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? At p�e,,`�,•,r� c 9osan.,,, ca r� ecJ x , of ©�o �,i '�, 1 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? t� r) 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? N io ' DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed bv: �".. 0,_ - o A Date: Li ' `Ari — O 1 Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 j The Critical; Areas Checklist contained on this form is to I be filled of t by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed; to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: -7 &M ;T CC)l �T�P Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $45.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable I attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or. incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. ! By my signature, I certify that the in I knowledge and that I am authorized to ` SIGNATURE & APPLICANT/AGENT )its herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my on the behalf of the owner as listed below. DATE I7• O Property Owner's Authorization - U" By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and p�st_r attendant to4hj"19plicajioyl. SIGNATURE OF OWNER I� 'tan! '5L1 rrs �- I Street Address 65D-t4CA&21�. WA I City State Zip I Telephone:: t ��5. c95-7,4 Email address (optional): 6/�A DATE Applicant Representative: jy7� ta�:c r..I G7�f�' Name Street Address C- Dr40--lV5 VQ*- '*-Oso City State Zip e Telephone: Ll-Z� "775" a57oK Email Address (*optional): Critical Areas Checklist.doc/3.19.2001 Critical Areas Checklist CAFileNo: Site Information (soils/topography/ hydrology/ vegetggpn) Site Address/Location: 2. Property Tax Account Number: - • ' b b a- -1 - Off) - (peAR - OCR 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? X yes;._ no. If yes; how is site developed? !uJlL,�Xco' P"rMrLY 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: �4C ; Approx. Depth: _ What season(s) of the year? A41A 8. Site is in the floodway J45 floodplain A/a of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? '':'; Mows are seasonal? n! A (YVhat time of year? d A ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) _ X 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: Alb -For City Staff Use Only 0 20 = 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? 2. Site is Zoned? Fr, 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? A-cecWeor7 c xzra„ra �► ura F� C' O�pt�c �( a- /© `ill Xxi� f nnIL 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? t� n 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? < ' DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by: s a �-�._ CYO, D o Dabe: 4- Critical Areas Checklist.dod3.19.2001 S.E.P.A. Note: The following continues after the cover page, which makes reference to the Project name, Applicant and the Contact person. 4. Date checklist prepared: August, 2001 (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Apply for building permit approximately October 1, 2001. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approval of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building permit and ADB approval (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. A three story mixed use condominium/office building consisting of two floors of residential area approximately 19,528 square feet above a ground floor area approximately 10, 598 square feet consisting of two office spaces and a 23 stall parking garage. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps of detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 130 Fourth Ave. Edmonds WA 98020 " That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 23, township 27 north range 3 east, Willamette meridian, described as follows: Commencing on the west line of 4'" street at a point that is 120 feet north of the northwest corner of the intersection of 4'h street and Dayton street; thence west 126 feet, more or less, to the east line of said alley to a point that is 105 feet south of the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter; thence east along a line that is parallel with and 105 feet south of the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter to the east line of 4'h street; thence south along said west line a distance of 40 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Situated in the county of Snohomish, State of Washington (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountainous, other: Slopes down from Fourth Avenue to the alley. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Elevation change from 62.75' to 57.75' = 5.00' over a distance of 136' . This results in a slope of 3.6 percent. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. No agricultural soils found on the subject property. Developer will provide geo- technical report with this submittal. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 2000 cubic yards of filling will be required to be removed so as to adjust surface elevations to accommodate drainage and parking garage access. Consistent with Community Development Code: City of Edmonds Environmental Section: soils and topography, grading and filling on the site will proceed in accordance with the following policies: Grading will not jeopardize the stability of any slope or of any adjoining property. Temporary erosion control measures will be undertaken to reduce erosion during construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No temporary erosion control methods shall be undertaken to protect the integrity of the adjacent properties. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt of buildings)? 100 % of site is impervious surface. 2. AIR (STAFF COMMENTS h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Drainage protection is proposed around the building and development areas, with the use offoundation and roof drainage systems that empty into a tight lined storm system. The storm system will be tied to the existing system in the alley. Erosion protection of the exposed soils areas will be achieved through containment of potential runoff on the site or on adjacent property. All erosion control measure imposed by the City of Edmonds Engineering Department will be followed. (STAFF COMMENTS) a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Possible dust during construction, no emissions after the project is completed other than that from automobiles. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce of control emissions of other impacts to the project, if any: N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Based on the February 19, 1986, Flood Insurance Rate Map no portion of the project lies within the 100 yearJlood plain. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve and discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENTS (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals of humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. (STAFF COMMENTS c. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? if so, describe. The principal source of water runoff will be rainwater and snow melt from roof, parking, and landscape impervious surface. Storm water runoff will be collected in a series of catch basins and underground pipes, and conducted to a detention system, which will discharge into the existing alley storm sewer, which will eventually discharge into the Puget Sound. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Typical components of storm water from impervious surfaces such as roads and parking areas and are petrochemicals, automotive waste products. In the completed project, storm water runofjfrom impervious surfaces on site will be collected in the catch basin collection system and treated will oil/water separation before being routed to the adjoining storm sewer system for eventual discharge into the Puget Sound. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of Edmonds (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: During construction, temporary measures will be employed to control runoff and water quality, including appropriate water management practices. In the completed project, oil/water separation and detention will control impacts of runoffform impervious surfaces, including those subject to vehicle uses. (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:_ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X X crop or gram wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: Other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping, which will meet the Edmonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The existing vegetation shall be replaced with new landscaping, which will exceed the Edmonds Community Development Code Landscape requirements. (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. ANIMALS a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring shellfish, other: X None (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical lighting and Gas appliances. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This project will meet all of the requirements of the State and Local energy codes. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project (for example, Traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: Typical construction noise during construction hours. Long-term: Normal routine traffic on Dayton and Fourth Ave. S (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Currently the site is vacant. The adjacent property to the North is a small commercial business. The adjacent property to the south is a commercial bank with on site customer service. 10 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Describe any structures on the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? BC: Community Business (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? BC: Community Business (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? N/A (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25-35 (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Twelve upper middle to high -income units shall be provided. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. AESTHETICS 1K a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? 25' above average datum to top plate with a maximum 5' sloped roof. The principal exterior element shall be wood siding. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Approval of aesthetics by the Edmonds Architectural Design Board required to continue this project. (STAFF COMMENTS) 1 1. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Wall mounted exterior light fixtures (decorative) on photocells. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A. 13 (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City parks, Puget Sound, city recreation center, private athletic club. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A. (STAFF COMMENTS) 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A. 14 (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The public street at the project is 41h Ave. S. and The alley between 4'h Ave. and 3.d Ave. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the nearest public transit site is 1 block north on Dayton street. (STAFF COMMENTS) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 23 parking stalls shall be provided. The existing site has no parking areas. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The developer to install a new City sidewalk the length of the entire project property, per City design standards. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 15 Please see attached for Number of vehicular trips. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Sufficient off-street parking will be provided reduce congestion within the project and traffic movement signs will be provided to control movements where necessary. Mitigation payments will be offered to the City of Edmonds and Washington State Department of Transportation for impacts to surrounding roadways as necessary. (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Normal fire and police protection shall be required. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The project shall meet or exceed all current fire code requirements for a new building (STAFF COMMENTS) 16 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. Electrical: Snohomish County PUD Telephone: Verizon Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy Sewer System: City of Edmonds Sewer System (STAFF COMMENTS) 17 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true to the best of my owledge. 1 understand that the lead agency is relying on 7W94 Date Submitted D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposal measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 4. How would the proposal be likely to use of affect environmentally sensitive areas of areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL m Z Lovell-Sauerland 8z Associates 19400 33rd Avenue W Suite 200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Phone 425-775-1591 Fax 425-672-7998 Toll Free Phone 800-775-7663 TO: 5utterficU Design Group ` �'00 Dayton Street, Suite C �-amonao, `NA 9E-020 1 ATTENTION: Mr. 5rad 5utterield ' WE ARE SENDING YOU: DATE: 'Aay 236 2CC1 JOB No. 426� SUBJECT: Copner5tione Traffic 35tuay NUMBER DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION 3 Mav 25, 2001 TCOnpere-tone Traffic study REMARKS: SIGNED: )4 Dale B. VV-a—tkins, P.E. file LEGEND XX% _ % DISTRIBUTION XX = AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIPS XX = PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS cPMONDS _ KINGS / ON •.Ry J J i , , , SITE i r i Q i ' cn ' z � o Liw i i r/ CASPERS ST 20S ;v 22 P 2 N MAIN ST DAYTON ST 60� 10% 66 t1 t � WALNUT ST I Ln > > ; HOLLY DR w Q Q Q Q o = T HOMELAND DR Qf HEMLOCK WY EDMONDS CITY LIMITS PINE ST. WOODWAY CITY LIMITS -� SEAMONT LN 04 NET TRAFFIC GENERATION NET WEEKDAY ADT................110 NET PM PEAK HOUR...............11 COPPERSTONE BUILDING NET TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION MAP FIGURE N O . 1 LSA No. 4263 L EHGiNEERS , SURVEYORS , PLANNERS , DEVELOPME)fT (ONSUULM May 23. 2001 LSA No. 4263 0 01 Mr. Sherman Goong, PE Traffic Engineer City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds. WA 98020 Re: Copperstone Building Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Goong, The purpose of this letter is to provide traffic information regarding the proposed Copperstone Building located on the west side of 4th Avenue south of Main Street and north of Dayton Street. The proposed will house commercial activities and consist of 1,170 sf. of office area on the first floor and 11 condominium units on the second and third floors. Parking will be provided by a first floor parking structure with 25 parking spaces including two handicapped van assessable structures. Existing Street System The parking garage of the proposed building will access the alley west of 4th Avenue in downtown Edmonds. The alley in turn access south to Dayton Street and north to Main Street. Dayton is the closer to the project entrance. Dayton in turn provides access to the south through its direct connection to Edmonds Way, SR-104 and 5`' Avenue. North of the project, Main Street provides access to SR 104, and 3" Avenue to SR-524 and Lynnwood. A number of the major downtown streets serve as arterial routes and are designated as state highways by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). These roadways include SR-524 beginning at the ferry terminal and consisting of Main Street west of Third Avenue and Third Avenue north of Main Street. SR-104 begins at the ferry terminal and proceeds south on Edmonds Way west of the proposed project. SR-104 provides access to SR-99 and 1-5. A spur of SR-524 begins on Third Avenue at Main and includes Third Avenue to Dayton and Dayton to Edmonds Way. Trip Generation The total number of vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project were determined using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, 1997. ITE Classification 710, general office building and ITE Classification 814, Specialty Retail Center were used to determine trip generation. As described in the ITE manual, a general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of business are conducted. An office building may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services-, insurance companies; investment brokers; and tenant services such as a bank or savings and loan. The condominium contains 11 units, including a bedroom suite. This facility is expected be used by guest on an occasional basis, in lieu of staying withing the various units. No additional trips were allocated to this unit. The expected trip generation from the proposed building is shown in Table 1. Lovell-Sauerland &Associates. Inc. 19400 33rd Ave. IV.. Suite 200. Lynnwood. IVA 98036 800-775-7663 425-775-IS91 425-672-7998 fax Mr. Sherman Goong May 23. 2001 Page 2 Table 1 Traffic Generation Copperstone Building Total Average Weekday Trips (ADT) 1,710 sf.ofoffice .......................................................... 65 11 condominium units .................................. .................. 64 less existing single family houses ..................................... Li-9) Total 110 PM Peak Hour Trips 1, 710 sf. of office .......................... ..................... 7 11 condominium units . ...... ..... ......... 6 less existing single family houses .............................................. (2) Total 11 1. Trip rates are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual. 6th Edition Trip Distribution The projected trip distribution for the 110 ADT and 11 p.m. peak hour trips generated by the project is shown in on Figure 1, Trip Distribution. Trip generation consists of equally of commercial traffic (office) and residential traffic. Trip distribution has been place on arterials accessing areas higher commercial and residential densities. The trip distribution indicates that more than half of the traffic will access the site via SR-104 south of Edmonds. The remainder of the traffic is expected to travel by major routes to and from north and east. Traffic Mitigation The City of Edmonds has a traffic concurrency mitigation program whereby the City has identified projects designed to maintain an acceptable level of service within the City. The project has a total of 11 net PM peak hour trips distributed onto the City of Edmonds street system. Based on the City's current policy, the traffic mitigation for ongoing projects is $200 .00 per pm peak hour trip. On this basis, the project traffic impacts are fully mitigated by the payment of $2,200.00 (11 x $200.00) to the City of Edmonds. Sincerely, Dale B. Watkins, P.E. EXPIRES 3/03 BM 5000 GOVT. LOT 2 & S.E. 1/4, OF S.E V/4, SEC. 23, T- 27 N., R.3 E.W.M. I" = 200' c SW. Cal Gor. Lot I LW. COL Gov. Lot i � ,ll M1` Q �ryyv r p2 a r• O pCy1- / 13 ✓ w os7 t J 0 ' /-oy2 Z A \V a Ft1 2 FpM , sA s 2 oT J � J� p y - 6 �N � 1 F<< S.. co,. N.E Ca. Gor, Lot 2 S.E. Gor, Gov Lntl ONE FS J q�✓ f ° w/ /s c 02/ N C JAME �o a/ o $^G` (Condo) ST r ✓ B g e (864// °I / I S. E. CA, Go,Lot z S,W Ce, Gor. Lot 2 _ N.W tor. Gar. Lot EL %P/TAN a-osl a-ndL a-n91 J_ / ^ NE Co,Cat. Gov. Lot 3 (d condo) — — — — _ _ is r` / t)� q_052 4_-47 �- 30 4_oss I•o+e I o i t-03q q -090 HARBNI V/Z-w /EW V-OSP v, l � I -Olt 8 AZA Y'fi� YO I 4-oTs 4-Oqo DAYTON ST. --- — IA I dl v I It.ms q"_0 �`'r! y^41 CITY SEWAGE Z/O ro o d-o5, 14-oSal p j OF d-o]/ TREATMENT Are. S. I 1 — 4 077 EOMONp3 SEABBOoIY I.Oi7 4-072 py PLANT / �dp I A-o95 99YY t q-a91 4-060 .•073 _ — O� JASKn AT Q9Ng h q•oJ4 50 (Condo/ g\/4) 090 (G61X1 ER 4 HAFBOR Q O GATE �\ ALDER ST. z4r (Condo! Are � � _ _ eiz7 T. LDE7 (7865) q•/zo ,/2e \ 0S• ------ /hrona4/ 3 J A4rf/E 4413-/i/ I•R9 of to, 6 C) IB79B/ eeA.A- I%ao \ q-o!] 9 b W y 3P3 3,d 4-/4i — o_ ¢-I57 14-09a • 7�(e%/I9/ -- q_ni qa9— ----------L--- --- i ��7EAU 4-/ql 4-//a 9-/32 4-90 (m+reJ IY/N -- I_iz3 1 qy) InSTECLA'S LANDING 4w5 `` A!e : �o I. — .-,ice 4',)9 \� (Condo) (PHASE // WALNUT •ST. (8433) 4-yn N•1A_tAq 9_-/iS a-nS I I 9-loi 4-/1 44-/30 4-)48 9-014 _ o - SECo,. Gov Lot 3 NOTE: iA.N., Ju1y,'73 This is not a survey it is a parcel map 23 24 Used for location of property only o 26 25 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties located within 300 feet of the subject property. r, Signature�pf ApiVidant-or-Applicaflt's4Rep?esentative Subscribed and sworn to before me this ( of atc,yda c Notary Public in 4nd for the State of Washington ' Residing at APO.doc\LATemp\forms MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Erga Joe & Carol A Site : *No Site Address* Mail : 1027 SW Lake Roesiger Rd Snohomish Wa 98290 ` Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories Parcel : 2327 034 035 00 00 Xjerd Price ToL4V : $55,100 YB Plat SgFt : Ac :.03 Ph : 360-568-1209 Owner : Larabee Cheryl E Parcel : 2327 034 036 00 09 Site : 104 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 07/18/1991 Mail : 104 5Th Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $180,000 Full Use : 61500 Com,Finance,Insur,Real Estate TotAV : $171,500 YB: 1941 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 1,538 Ac: .05 Ph Owner : Earling David O & Susan J Parcel : 2327 034 037 00 08 Site : 108 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 12/01/1985 Mail : 17511 Talbot Rd Edmonds Wa 98026 Price : $162,000 Use : 53300 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TOtAV : $249,600 YB: 1950 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,116 Ac: .09 Ph : 425-775-6754 Owner : Borgert Family Trust Parcel : 2327 034 038 00 07 Site : 112 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 12/15/1995 Mail : 751 Laurel St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 57320 Com,Retail,Home Furnishings ToL4V : $388,600 YB: 1950 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,584 Ac :.09 Ph : 425-778-8758 Owner : Borgert Family Trust Site : 112 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Mail : 751 Laurel St Edmonds Wa 98020 Use : 57320 Com,Retail,Home Furnishings RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm: 3 Bth F3H : 3 / / Stories : Parcel Xferd Price ToL4V Plat SgFt : 3,584 Ac : 2327 034 038 00 07 : 12/15/1995 : $388,600 YB: 1950 : :.09 Ph : 425-778-8758 Owner : Rich Jacobson Parcel : 2327 034 039 00 06 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd : 11/19/1998 Mail : Price : $2,225,000 Use : 53920 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $17,500 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories: SgFt : Ac: .01 Ph Owner : Rich Jacobson Parcel : 2327 034 040 00 03 Site : 120 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 11/19/1998 Mail : 120 5Th Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $2,225,000 Use : 53920 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $1,402,000 YB : 1962 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 4,544 Ac :.38 Ph Owner : Rich Jacobson Site : 120 5Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Mail : 120 5T11 Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Use : 53920 Com,Retail,General Merchandise RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories Parcel : 2327 034 040 00 03 Xferd :11/19/1998 Price : $2,225,000 ToL4V : $1,402,000 YB : 1962 Plat SgFt : 10,970 Ac :.38 Ph The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Leslie Realty Inc Parcel : 2327 034 04100 02 Site : 115 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xjerd Mail : 20624 Maplewood Dr Edmonds Wa 98026 Price Use : 65900 Pro,Prof Services,Other TotAV : $316,400 YB : 1963 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,490 Ac :.21 Ph : 425-778-5890 Owner : Westerlind Ted R Parcel : 2327 034 042 00 01 Site : 127 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xjerd Mail : 8498 Talbot Rd Edmonds Wa 98026 Price Use : 11102 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,2 Unit TotAV : $249,500 YB: 1951 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories : 1 SgFt : 648 Ac: .17 Ph : 425-778-4712 Owner : Westerlind Ted R Parcel : 2327 034 042 00 01 Site : 127 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 8498 Talbot Rd Edmonds Wa 98026 Price Use : 11102 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,2 Unit TotAV : $249,500 YB: 1910 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : 1.5 SgFt : 955 Ac :.17 Ph : 425-778-4712 Owner : Westerlind Ted R Parcel : 2327 034 043 00 00 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd Mail : 8498 Talbot Rd Edmonds Wa 98026 Price Use : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,UnusedLand TotAV : $6,100 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories : SgFt : Ac: .01 Ph : 425-778-4712 Owner : Rich Jacobson Parcel : 2327 034 044 00 09 Site : *No Site Address* Edmonds Xjerd : 11/19/1998 Mail Price : $2,225,000 Use : 46100 Tra,Automobile Pkng, Structure ToL4V : $265,400 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories : SgFt : Ac :.20 Ph Owner : Rich Jacobson Parcel : 2327 034 045 00 08 Site : *No Site Address* Edmonds Xjerd : 11/19/1998 Mail Price : $2,225,000 Use : 46100 Tra,Automobile Pkng, Structure TotAV : $226,800 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories : SgFt : Ac :.18 Ph Owner : Hunt Richard Parcel : 2327 034 046 00 07 Site : 122 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 19208 88Th Ave W Edmonds Wa 98026 Price Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise ToL4V : $274,300 YB : 1906 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H: 1 / / Stories: 1.5 SgFt : 1,169 Ac :.20 Ph : 425-776-2932 Owner : Hunt Richard Site : 122 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Mail : 19208 88Th Ave W Edmonds Wa 98026 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories : 1 Parcel : 2327 034 046 00 07 Xferd Price TotAV : $274,300 YB: 1910 Plat SgFt : 434 Ac :.20 Ph : 425-776-2932 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Swanson Roy B Parcel : 2327 034 047 00 06 Site : 128 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 1028 C Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 11101 Res, Sgl Family Res,Detached,I Unit ToMV : $198,000 YB : 1927 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm : 3 Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : 1.5 SgFt : 1,292 Ac :.13 Ph : 425-672-1355 Owner : U S Bank Corp Prop Parcel : 2327 034 049 00 04 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd Mail : 2800 E Lake St Lake 0012 Minneapolis Mn 55406 Price Use : 61100 Com,Finance,Insur,Real Estate TotAV : $217,400 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : Ac: .16 Ph Owner : U S Bank Corp Prop Parcel : 2327 034 050 00 00 Site : 140 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 11/01/1975 Mail : 2800 E Lake St Lake 0012 Minneapolis Mn 55406 Price : $239,702 Use : 61100 Com,Finance,Insur,Real Estate ToMV : $434,400 YB : 1964 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,426 Ac :.22 Ph Owner : Frontier Bank Parcel : 2327 034 05100 09 Site : 123 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : PO Box 2215 Everett Wa 98203 Price Use : 61100 Com,Finance,Insur,Real Estate ToMV : $657,100 YB : 1985 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 8,296 Ac :.24 Ph : 206-353-5599 Owner : Frontier Bank Parcel : 2327 034 052 00 08 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd : 08/01/1973 Mail : PO Box 2215 Everett Wa 98203 Price Use : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land ToMV : $186,800 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories: SgFt : Ac :.15 Ph : 206-353-5599 Owner Site Mail Use RTSQ Bedrm : : Frontier Bank : *No Site Address* : PO Box 2215 Everett Wa 98203 : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land :03E -27N -23 -SE Bth F3H : / / Stories : Parcel : 2327 034 053 00 07 Xferd : 10/01/1971 Price : $15,000 TotAV : $187,700 YB Plat SgFt : Ac: .15 Ph : 206-353-5599 Owner : Beresford Family Llc Parcel : 2327 034 054 00 06 Site : 145 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/13/2000 Mail : 145 3Rd Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $134,500 Use : 65000 Pro,Professional Services TotAV : $873,800 YB : 1987 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 13,430 Ac :.20 Ph Owner : U S Bank Corp Prop Parcel : 2327 034 055 00 05 Site : *No Site Address* Edmonds Xferd : 05/01/1978 Mail : 2800 E Lake St Lake 0012 Minneapolis Mn 55406 Price : $50,000 Use : 46100 Tra,Automobile Pkng,Structure ToMV : $133,300 YB RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : Ac: .09 Ph The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner Site Mail Use RTSQ Bedrm : : Puget Sound Invstmnt InUnt : 303 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 : 2201 6Th Ave #1301 Seattle Wa 98121 : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land :03E -27N -23 -SE Bth F3H : / / Stories : Parcel Xferd Price ToL4V Plat . SgFt : Ac: : 2327 034 056 00 04 : 03/11/1998 : $432,500 : $135,000 YB .10 Ph Owner : Williams Associates Parcel : 2327 034 057 00 03 Site : 203 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 03/01/1982 Mail : PO Box 2812 Seattle Wa 98111 Price : $265,000 Use : 13010 Res,10-14 Family Residence, l0 Units Tod V : $432,000 YB: 1957 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 14 Bth F3H : 5 / / Stories : SgFt : 6,180 Ac :.33 Ph Owner : Dickey Cathleen Patton Parcel : 2327 034 058 00 02 Site : 320 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/01/1982 Mail : 7507 Braemar Dr Edmonds Wa 98026 Price : $67,000 Use : 65000 Pro,Professional Services TotAV : $1,141,000 YB: 1983 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 19,479 Ac :.25 Ph : 425-745-5733 Owner : Patton L Cathleen Trustee; Credit Trust Parcel : 2327 034 065 00 03 Site : 330 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/16/1992 Mail : 8902 205Th PI SW Edmonds Wa 98026 Price : $110,000 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $413,600 YB: 1968 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 4,044 Ac: .20 Ph : 206-778-6490 Owner : Radwick Rollin G/Loretta K Parcel : 2327 034 069 00 09 Site : 410 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 10/30/1990 Mail : 400 Dayton St #A Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $59,869 Full Use : 65000 Pro,Professional Services TOtAV : $129,800 YB: 1922 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : 1 SgFt : 680 Ac :.07 Ph Owner : Bennett Chester R Parcel : 2327 034 070 00 06 Site : 400 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 05/01/1977 Mail : 607 Elm PI Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $35,000 Use : 65200 Pro,Prof Services,Legal TotAV : $338,300 YB: 1981 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,900 Ac: .11 Ph : 425-778-2939 Owner : Jacobsen Jack B & Charlene F Parcel : 2327 034 07100 05 Site : 101 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/01/1977 Mail : PO Box 355 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $35,000 Use : 57140 Com,Retail,Home Furnishings TU4V : $424,000 YB: 1983 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 4,879 Ac: .17 Ph Owner : Spanovic Nicholas & Alexandra Site : 215 4Th Ave S Edmonds 98020 Mail : 215 4Th Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Use : 11101 Res,Sgl Family Res,Detached,1 Unit RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : 1 Parcel : 2327 034 072 00 04 Xferd :07/01/1976 Price : $25,000 TotAV : $206,400 YB : 1922 Plat SgFt : 968 Ac :.18 Ph The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Payne R Gregory Parcel : 2327 034 078 00 08 Site : 420 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 07/17/1995 Mail : 8837 29Th Ave NW Seattle Wa 98117 Price : $240,000 Full Use : 13007 Res,5-9 Family Residence,? Units To0V : $266,500 YB : 1933 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : SgFt : 4,400 Ac :.12 Ph : 206-784-5058 Owner : Payne R Gregory Parcel : 2327 034 078 00 08 Site : 420 Dayton St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 07/17/1995 Mail : 8837 29Th Ave NW Seattle Wa 98117 Price : $240,000 Full Use : 13007 Res,5-9 Family Residence,7 Units TotAV : $266,500 YB: 1933 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : 1 Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : 1 SgFt : 648 Ac :.12 Ph : 206-784-5058 Owner : Miller Robin L & Carol Parcel : 2327 034 082 00 02 Site : 146 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 10/01/1988 Mail : 17358 Beach Dr NE Seattle Wa 98155 Price : $134,500 Use : 66100 Com,Contract Construction Services To0V : $267,100 YB : 1930 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat Bedrm : Bth F3H : 1 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,286 Ac :.16 Ph : 206-368-9093 Owner : Aglow International Parcel : 2327 034 092 00 00 Site : 202 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 05/31/1996 Mail : PO Box 1548 Lynnwood Wa 98046 Price : $385,000 Full Use : I I101 Res, Sgl Family Res,Detached,I Unit ToL4V : $296,400 YB : 1920 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Bedrm : 5 Bth F3H : 5 / / Stories : 2 SgFt : 2,777 Ac :.12 Ph Owner : Turner Ann Parcel : 4344 015 006 01 08 ' Site : 422 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/22/1996 Mail : PO Box 458 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $225,000 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $357,000 YB : 1959 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 4,438 Ac : Ph Owner : Erga Joe & Carol A Parcel : 4344 015 006 02 07 Site : 418 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 03/01/1984 Mail : 1027 SW Lake Roesiger Rd Snohomish Wa 98290 Price : $130,000 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $145,900 YB : 1920 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,600 Ac : Ph : 360-568-1209 Owner : Beeson Partners Lessor Parcel : 4344 015 007 00 08 Site : 410 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/17/1996 Mail : 410 Main St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $545,000 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise ToL4V : $577,000 YB : 1909 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 7,546 Ac : Ph Owner : Beeson Partners Lessor Parcel : 4344 015 007 00 08 Site : 410 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/17/1996 Mail : 410 Main St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $545,000 Use : 53000 Com,Retail,General Merchandise TotAV : $577,000 YB : 1909 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories: SgFt : 7,388 Ac : Ph The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Beeson Partners Lessor Parcel : 4344 015 008 01 06 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd : 06/17/1996 Mail Price Use : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land TWA : $138,600 YB RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : Ac : Ph Owner : Beeson Partners Lessor Parcel : 4344 015 008 02 05 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd : 06/17/1996 Mail : Price : $8,269,380 Use : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land TOtAV : $100,800 YB RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : Ac : Ph Owner : Corp RI / Est Nw Parcel : 4344 016 003 00 00 Site : 306 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 306 Main St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 61100 Com,Finance,Insur,Real Estate ToL4V : $1,474,100 YB: 1956 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 12,498 Ac : Ph Owner : Tamer Ann Parcel : 4344 016 005 01 07 Site : 318 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 09/20/1995 Mail : PO Box 458 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $270,000 Use : 53300 Com,Retail,General Merchandise ToG4V : $242,500 YB: 1910 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,354 Ac : Ph Owner : Hirshberg Joan S Parcel : 4344 016 005 02 06 Site : 326 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 10101 SE 3Rd St #405 Bellevue Wa 98004 Price Use : 63000 Com,Business Services ToL4V : $328,900 YB: 1907 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 2,400 Ac : Ph : 425-637-8676 Owner : Hirshberg Joan S Parcel : 4344 016 005 02 06 Site : 326 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 10101 SE 3Rd St #405 Bellevue Wa 98004 Price Use : 63000 Com,Business Services ToL4V : $328,900 YB : 1907 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm: Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 2,400 Ac : Ph : 425-637-8676 Owner : Blatt Family Limited Partnership Parcel : 4344 016 005 03 05 Site : 316 Main St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 12/30/1999 Mail : 316 Main St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $545,000 Use : 68100 Ins,Nursery,Primary,Secondary, ToMV : $524,000 YB : 1900 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 2,972 Ac : Ph Owner : Blatt Family Limited Partnership Site : 316 Main St Edmonds 98020 Mail : 316 Main St Edmonds Wa 98020 Use:68100Ins,Nursery,Primary,Secondary RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories Parcel : 4344 016 005 03 05 Xferd :12/30/1999 Price : $545,000 TotAV : $524,000 YB : 1900 Plat : Edmonds Plat Of SgFt : 3,000 Ac : Ph The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / Snohomish (WA) Owner : Frontier Bank Parcel : 4344 016 Ol l 00 00 Site : *No Site Address* Xferd : 08/O1/1973 Mail : PO Box 2215 Everett Wa 98203 Price Use : 91000 Vacant,Undeveloped,Unused Land TotAV : $180,000 YB RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Edmonds Plat Of Bedrm : Bth F311: / / Stories : SgFt : Ac : Ph : 206-353-5599 Owner : Cetina Douglas M/Pamela J Parcel : 4548 001 001 00 08 Site : 221 James St Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 09/15/1999 Mail : 8814 218Th Ave NE Redmond Wa 98053 Price : $475,000 Full Use : 12304 Res,Four Family Residence,Fourplex TotAV : $356,500 YB : 1959 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Gepharts 1St Add To Edmonds Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 3,736 Ac : Ph : 425-868-2317 Owner : Tindall Thomas R Parcel : 4548 001 003 00 06 Site : 126 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/01/1990 Mail : 126 3Rd Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $165,000 Use : 69990 Soc,Other Misc Services ToL4V : $494,300 YB : 1991 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Gepharts 1St Add To Edmonds Bedrm : Bth F3H : / /2 Stories : SgFt : 2,532 Ac : Ph : 425-774-7739 Owner : Tindall Thomas R Parcel : 4548 001 003 00 06 Site : 126 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/01/1990 Mail : 126 3Rd Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $165,000 Use : 69990 Soc,Other Misc Services TotAV : $494,300 YB : 1991 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Gepharts 1St Add To Edmonds Bedrm: 4 Bth F3H : 4 / / Stories : SgFt : 2,423 Ac : Ph : 425-774-7739 Owner : Jensen Sterling V Et Ux Parcel : 6782 000 10100 09 Site : 200 James St #101 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 11/01/1988 Mail : 200 James St #101 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $127,500 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $181,000 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,622 Ac : Ph : 206-771-9203 Owner : Hood William B Jr/Katherine T Parcel : 6782 000 102 00 08 Site : 200 James St #102 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 10/12/1993 Mail :200 James St #102 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $185,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $152,400 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,517 Ac : Ph : Owner : Brent George C/Darline D Trustees Parcel : 6782 000 103 00 07 Site : 200 James St #103 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/14/2000 Mail : 200 James St #103 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $217,975 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $188,500 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,689 Ac : Ph : Owner : Younkin Merrill V & Dorothy V Parcel : 6782 000 104 00 06 Site :200 James St #104 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 08/01/1984 Mail : 200 James St #104 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $130,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $187,700 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,682 Ac : Ph : 206-776-3484 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed Me(roScan / Snohomish (WA) Owner : Hasson Marcella Parcel : 6782 000 105 00 13 Site : 200 James St #105 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 06/09/1998 Mail : 200 James St #105 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 11001 Res, Condominium ToL4V : $104,260 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,597 Ac : Ph : Owner : Vukonich Ronald N/Jane C Parcel : 6782 000 106 00 04 Site : 200 James St #106 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 08/14/1997 Mail : 200 James St #106 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $214,500 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $151,400 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,507 Ac : Ph : Owner : Anderson Donald & Alicia Parcel : 6782 000 107 00 03 Site : 200 James St #107 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/01/1999 Mail : 200 James St #107 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $192,750 Use : 11001 Res, Condominium TotAV : $160,900 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,602 Ac : Ph : Owner : Ballard Ronald D & Loretta Parcel : 6782 000 108 00 02 Site : 200 James St #108 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/01/1985 Mail : 17331 E Teal Dr Fountain Hills Az 85268 Price : $107,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $156,800 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,561 Ac : Ph : 480-837-1776 Owner : Argent Julie E Parcel : 6782 000 20100 08 Site : 200 James St #201 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 06/01/1979 Mail : 200 James St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $135,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $219,000 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,622 Ac : Ph : 425-778-4809 Owner : Seaborg Harold J/Ellie L Parcel : 6782 000 202 00 07 Site : 200 James St #202 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 05/02/1991 Mail : 200 James St #202 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $210,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $184,300 YB : 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,517 Ac : Ph : Owner : Spiro Robert J/Janis M Parcel : 6782 000 203 00 06 Site : 200 James St #203 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 04/27/2000 Mail : 200 James St Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $255,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $228,000 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,689 Ac : Ph : Owner : Evarts Arlene F Parcel : 6782 000 204 00 05 Site : 200 James St #204 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 10/01/1984 Mail : 200 James St #A-204 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $155,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $227,100 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,682 Ac : Ph : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Medalia Michael J & Gene H Parcel : 6782 000 205 00 04 Site : 200 James St #205 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 09/01/1986 Mail : 200 James St #205 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $125,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToMV : $194,000 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,597 Ac : Ph : Owner : Plommer William/M A Parcel : 6782 000 206 00 03 Site : 200 James St #206 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 04/20/1999 Mail : 200 James St #206 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $220,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToMV : $183,100 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,507 Ac : Ph : Owner : Wuscher Ralph & Clute Carol Parcel : 6782 000 207 00 02 Site : 200 James St #207 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 02/01/1982 Mail : 200 James St #207 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $119,000 Use : 11001 Res, Condominium ToMV : $194,700 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,602 Ac : Ph : 206-778-6102 Owner : Kroon William D & Lucille M Parcel : 6782 000 208 00 01 Site : 200 James St #208 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 08/01/1979 Mail : 200 James St #208 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $102,800 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToMV : $189,600 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,561 Ac : Ph : Owner : Hvatum Arthur R & Louise J Parcel : 6782 000 30100 07 Site : 200 James St #301 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 01/01/1979 Mail : 200 James St #301 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $119,160 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToMV : $272,500 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,781 Ac : Ph : 206-775-1395 Owner : Bundy Victor C & Mildred L Parcel : 6782 000 302 00 06 Site : 200 James St #302 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 07/01/1993 Mail : 200 James St #302 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $175,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToMV : $208,900 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,517 Ac : Ph : Owner : Rast William C & Mrs Parcel : 6782 000 303 00 05 Site : 200 James St #303 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 02/01/1979 Mail : 200 James St #303 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $139,500 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $103,720 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,695 Ac : Ph : Peck David Parcel : 6782 000 304 00 04 "00 James St #304 Edmonds 98020 Xjerd : 01/21/1997 -rues St #304 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price q,Condominium ToMV : $259,300 YB: 1978 -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium 'qH : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,695 Ac : Ph : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan / Snohomish (WA) Owner : Angus June B Parcel : 6782 000 305 00 03 Site : 200 James St #305 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 11/14/1996 Mail : 200 James St #305 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $210,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $219,900 " YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,597 Ac : Ph : Owner : Cade Billy V/Lenore R Parcel : 6782 000 306 00 02 Site : 200 James St #306 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 10/08/1996 Mail : 200 James St #306 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 11001 Res, Condominium TotAV : $207,500 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,507 Ac : Ph : Owner : Mills Madelaine Trustee Parcel : 6782 000 307 00 01 Site : 200 James St #307 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 09/30/1997 Mail : 200 James St #307 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $220,000 Full Use : 11001 Res, Condominium To0V : $220,600 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,602 Ac : Ph : Owner : Donegan Lenore Parcel : 6782 000 308 00 00 Site : 200 James St #308 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/15/1998 Mail : 200 James St #308 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $230,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $221,900 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,612 Ac : Ph : Owner : Farrell Everett J Parcel : 6782 000 40100 06 Site : 200 James St #401 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 12/01/1978 Mail : 200 James St #401 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $123,600 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $304,500 YB : 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,781 Ac : Ph : 206-778-1793 Owner : Brunsvold Vesta Mae Parcel : 6782 000 402 00 05 Site : 200 James St #402 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 08/23/1993 Mail : 200 James St #402 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $110,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TOtAV : $233,500 YB : 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,517 Ac : Ph : Owner : Gregerson Barbara A Parcel : 6782 000 403 00 04 Site : 200 James St #403 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 12/30/1994 Mail : 200 James St #403 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $325,000 Use : 11001 Res, Condominium ToL4V : $304,400 YB: 1978 RTSQ :03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,695 Ac : Ph : Hammersla William D Parcel : 6782 000 404 00 03 ''n James St #404 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 04/01/1980 m_ es St #404 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $150,000 -;,Condominium ToL4V : $304,400 YB: 1978 -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium 7H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,695 Ac : Ph : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Weston G T Parcel : 6782 000 405 00 02 Site : 200 James St #405 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 01/01/1986 Mail : 200 James St #405 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $145,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $245,800 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,597 Ac : Ph : 206-672-4753 Owner : Grant-Elway Dorothy Parcel : 6782 000 406 00 01 Site : 200 James St #406 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 06/01/1993 Mail : 200 James St #406 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $50,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TotAV : $231,900 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,737 Ac : Ph : Owner : Roswick Margaret S Parcel : 6782 000 407 00 18 Site : 200 James St #407 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 03/09/1999 Mail : 200 James St #407 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $225,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $225,000 YB: 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,602 Ac : Ph : Owner : Faris Kenneth C & Shirley M Parcel : 6782 000 408 00 09 Site : 200 James St #408 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 05/21/1996 Mail : 200 James St #408 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $269,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $248,000 YB : 1978 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : El Capitan, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / / Stories : SgFt : 1,612 Ac : Ph : Owner : Goodwin Joy Parcel : 8139 000 00100 06 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #A Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/01/1993 Mail : 152 3Rd Ave S #A Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $425,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $438,800 YB : 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / it Stories : SgFt : 2,060 Ac : Ph : Owner : Mitchell Judith B Parcel : 8139 000 002 00 05 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #B Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/17/1998 Mail : 152 3Rd Ave S #B Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $427,500 Use : 11001 Res, Condominium TOtAV : $406,300 YB: 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 2 / A Stories : SgFt : 2,008 Ac : Ph : Owner : Eastman Leslie W Jr/Loretta J Parcel : 8139 000 003 00 04 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #C Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 08/04/1998 Mail : 152 3Rd Ave S #C Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $439,950 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium ToL4V : $406,300 YB: 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 2 / A Stories : SgFt : 2,010 Ac : Ph : Wiggins Jack/Karen Parcel : 8139 000 004 00 03 SO 3Rd Ave S #D Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 05/18/1994 d Ave S Edmonds Wa 98020 Price s,Condominium TotAV : $404,300 YB: 1992 -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium 7H : 2 / A Stories : SgFt : 1,998 Ac : Ph : 425-776-5211 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner Site Mail Use RTSQ Bedrm : : Ratelco Properties Corporation : 150 3Rd Ave S #101 Edmonds 98020 : 1266 Mercer St Seattle Wa 98109 : 11065 Pro,Professional Services,Condo : 03E -27N -23 -SE Bth F3H : / / Stories : Parcel Xferd Price TW V Plat SgFt : 2,098 Ac : : 8139 000 10100 05 : 02/28/1997 : $2,250,000 Full : $170,600 YB : 1993 : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Ph : 206-624-9700 Owner : Ratelco Properties Corporation Parcel : 8139 000 102 00 04 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #102 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/28/1997 Mail : 1266 Mercer St Seattle Wa 98109 Price : $2,250,000 Full Use : 11065 Pro,Professional Services,Condo TOtAV : $1,284,100 YB: 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 15,814 Ac : Ph : 206-624-9700 Owner : Ratelco Properties Corporation Parcel : 8139 000 20100 04 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #201 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/28/1997 Mail : 1266 Mercer St Seattle Wa 98109 Price : $2,250,000 Full Use : 11065 Pro,Professional Services,Condo TOtAV : $134,800 YB : 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 1,671 Ac : Ph : 206-624-9700 Owner : Ratelco Properties Corporation Parcel : 8139 000 202 00 03 Site : 150 3Rd Ave S #202 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/28/1997 Mail : 1266 Mercer St Seattle Wa 98109 Price : $2,250,000 Full Use : 11065 Pro,Professional Services,Condo ToL4V : $108,700 YB: 1992 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -SE Plat : Harbor View Plaza, A Condominium Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 1,343 Ac : Ph : 206-624-9700 Owner : Luoma Laurie W Parcel : 8308 000 20100 09 Site : 120 3Rd Ave S #201 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 02/25/1997 Mail : 120 3Rd Ave S #201 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TOtAV : $420,000 YB: 1994 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -NE Plat : Third Avenue Plaza Condominiums Bedrm: 2 Bth F3H : 1 A / Stories : SgFt : 2,866 Ac : Ph : Owner : Jessen Helen A Parcel : 8308 000 202 00 08 Site : 120 3Rd Ave S #202 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 11/21/1994 Mail : 114 2Nd Ave S #202 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $380,000 Full Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TOtAV : $390,000 YB : 1994 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -NE Plat : Third Avenue Plaza Condominiums Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 1 A / Stories : SgFt : 2,434 Ac : Ph : Owner : Simonton Paul B Jr/Mary Jane Trustees Parcel : 8308 000 203 00 07 Site : 120 3Rd Ave S #203 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 10/14/1999 Mail : 120 3Rd Ave S #203 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $395,000 Use : 11001 Res,Condominium TOtAV : $395,000 YB: 1994 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -NE Plat : Third Avenue Plaza Condominiums Bedrm : 2 Bth F3H : 1 A / Stories : SgFt : 2,623 Ac : Ph : Mower Robert A Trustee;Mower Robert A Tr Parcel : 8308 000 204 00 06 'I) 3Rd Ave S #204 Edmonds 98020 Xferd : 09/11/1998 'd Ave S #204 Edmonds Wa 98020 Price : $354,500 Full s,Condominium TotAV : $320,000 YB: 1994 -23 -NE Plat : Third Avenue Plaza Condominiums 'H : 1 A / Stories : SgFt : 2,472 Ac : Ph : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. MetroScan /Snohomish (WA) Owner : Third Ave Plaza Ltd Ptnship Parcel : 8308 000 205 00 05 Site : 120 3Rd Ave S Edmonds 98020 Xferd Mail : 1200 Westlake Ave N Seattle Wa 98109 Price Use : 11065 Pro,Professional Services,Condo TOtAV : $948,900 YB : 1994 RTSQ : 03E -27N -23 -NE Plat : Third Avenue Plaza Condominiums Bedrm : Bth F3H : / / Stories : SgFt : 13,212 Ac : Ph : The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. CALCULATION OF A VERA6E ELEVATION DATUM: The elevation numbers indicated below were directly spotted at the proposed building corners or are interpolations of EXI5TING GRADE for the projected corners (from survey prepared by and ,Chenoweth & Assciates Inc. P.5., April, 2000). NORTHWE5T CORNER SPOTTED @ 5 -1.1 5' NORTHEA.5T CORNER SPOTTED @ 6 1.5 6' 50UTHWE5T CORNER 5POTTED @ 6 1.08' 5OUTHEA5T GORNER SPOTTED @ 6 2. 1 5' TOTAL5: 242.03' _ 4 = 60.5 1' (Average Datum Elevation.) !L tidy SEE R.O.S. / BK.18, P283 1,59 SUBDIVISION LINE - - 143.44 I 30 W SPSpH z o0 6' PVC C.O. ? yDi t by P5� v 1 CI7v RECORDS SHOW THE SANITARY SEVER TO BE IN THE ALLEY. SEVER RUNS /° RIN 604 IN LE TALK IN LEAD IN CONCRETE � WALK A7 1.03 OFFSET / A SEE R.O.S. BK.13. P.95 4 \\\�\ \ � - N / O / SEE R.O.S. BK!0, P.138 FOUND ]/2' IRON BAR AT IRON SOUTH EDGE BAR R.E.S. OF ASHPHALT //F[-IUND K14.91 5.0 N 89'47.43' E 13420 16.00 136.01 I II o I ARE A=6,839s SO.F T. z S.F.R. I) A 1P 89'4 GARAGE - - - - - - I S.F.R. 85.9 -. poi AREA=5.439±SQ.F v II S 89'47'43' \ 1 135.97 POWER P POLE a a #130 II AREA=5.9333SO.FT. N130 I 135.96 SI F;�`ALLC�11.T CONCRETE CURB n .o 7.43' V GRAVEL DRIVE - COME. WALK ASPHALT DRIVE 2 BUILDING SEE R.O.S. BK.15, P266 30 v� ; I30 ' ALVE WATER METER I �l Q N CORY (DIN 30 0 30 60 90 S-IF, V = 30' MERIDIAN+ RO.S. BK.18. P283 CN89.59.41'E1 DAYTON ST LEGEND- !X DENOTES A FOUND TACK, • DENOTES AN 24' x 112' IRON BAR SET WITH CAP 49567, ® DENOTES A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE; ACCURACY MEETS VAC 332-130-090. 05' TOTAL STATION USED FOR A TRAVERSE. MONUMENTS SHOWN VISITED 10 NOV. 1999. TICAL DATUM- M.LL.W BENCH MARK, 'R' ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S.V. CORNER OF DAYTON ST. AND 4TH. AVE. S. ELEVATION = 61.35 FT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION, THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS - COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4T4. STREET AND DAYTON STREETt THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1792213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OLARTERI THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 47H STREET; SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE A7 z o I I THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID VEST LINE A ➢ISTAN-E OF 40 DAYTON ST. FEET. MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXACT LOCATION IN ALLEY 4. UNKNOWN. u o c u US BANK n BUILDING a I ATLH BAST ATCH BASIN 8 IM 59.2d ]M 59.25 'INV. 57.44 INV, OUT 57.45 A7CH BASIN 6' INV. IN 5".55 IM 52.6 1M 467 ® FLOW I SEVER MANHOLE DRAIN A IM 46.7 RIM NV. RIM 53.62 8' INV. 56.5 'BRASS DISC INV. 43.4 DA YTON ST. �T Ig• H 6' 19, AIN M.H. SURFACE MON 1 WIC IV. 56.7 AT 5FT. OFFSET y181.95 PER LEGAL DISC. Ss rY}\ tt u FLOW / S 89.59'41' V 355.86 MEAS. EXISTING N 89'S9'41' E 321.42 MEAS. SEVER MANHOLE V", P.K. NAIL IAINHOLEE WITH `R RIM 47.03 m vT - vL Y v� V� vI. SKNWRk vL X-CREISS P.K. RP.'. INV. 36.8 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey mode by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act of the request of ...................in NQY•.......19.9i. CERTIFICATE NUMBER .... 21;�M.......... WATER I` METER m 30➢0 IN IN THE S.E. 1/4 S.E. 1/4, SEC. 23, T-27-N, R-3-E, W.M. IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON all e,tf,I 1."n M95CAFE PLAN l,• 4�LtI .I _, V F}Y•IFnf �Y�1 LA. VI II LN,I VF} x't' maltnl ,)I,MVNG r7Ef& ��urr I. v4 LJf f,r- ., fl Ll-1'rl -F11 V.I F',f. r I LI`w 4 .-I t 4 , 1, -1 -kttl rr H,1 n . r•'rt./.'.,r . 1'rr• NOR6, I. IFVM1 itt c4 1'Itr I 1 r,t- ­ ­vn I v„ 1. 5HPUI3 PI AN11NG M& AA--4 14f ]bit I'J t•f I +'H .41 -1r- I1F'r PA VAL I'I.AN1' X,IICDU.� _ .11 V'. `I I'-n.r 'Fit © II 1-�11l, llttl'I1H C}I tf--It -F.1,I IIL.1- J' t,t roll l•II 1 dh-nt Ll•' dFI W -1 v 11 I MP',K,4T N01E5: C/1 M1', _6}'--.11 It Ft-}'• 1 n 11 F 1•'1' I � dLF"I .-�1i11 Y4-.II -rt �IVt-• \ F•.}1 r. ft'• }' f•' -r, FTI -�1 .11-:,: FF yl M r s. _:• r' ---11 rt _-Lr•, 1�1 r r... • n , rr.,.i : -hav . I �Irt F- f.I .L}fI L•,1 tim _1n'_11'- WMIh r.Y14-v__rt_I 1 M1'.:r.-5' -� 1 I II-, r, I -1 f� l�� nL' N .I r �I� M'•I U.'1 • YIF/".I I �I :'I FT.I } s.v.r:^,rL'�,ultn.lm I,IF�u,m',In'•1�. Ft'._t,f.rtmt,rr4 •, _H ne -F�C1 :,,�i1 n r-F It,l r,c4lur INit r-• ul : •,n' ,tr-snv ",IJl'. R"AP, I'•11.: Fl iil JL.I R.6n 5L-rei:--,fl tt 'IF'•;l it m'•r un}f- ' V } -i ", I'll I -3,11 H :•, f I./ Ff F n}F- I IT' it i l„- INft - It --F •1t -f'1 . -- 11 1 11 IT I fs ftilF 1IVI I F 11 IT I r 111IH'.I /'1 1' .' IF I i, I t 1 Fr'1 l - I}I/ ' U .ILH t"- II_11114W 11-111 HI.,1-.=Fi -cV I a-, H f•1 .II Obi ttFT- 1' IV_—, 1 .11 11 .I I LI I H ..F} - •11 •ibi :' ItF' - 1Ft W V it AA _-1 II H I rl dit - it \`0tlors p� � m oro a�� Z NQ= uj W _a Q � J N W � {0 � > IIQ�7L W O J Q m aaw n-.no AECISTERED d.PCHI,ECT fi�R 9R,OiIID SI�IF Q PR9�,Q1 z 9_ O <PL O O S az �c PRAVBYI XXX JOB NUMBER, rUC%JO(%JUCXXXXXX DATE+ XX/XX/XX DRA KN& NO. L� 6 -0` 01, 0.1vil"N I PA LTIV; A-,-, .4, Ll %/� �� . � / pOp0 t7MIN WNCA IL -ONPOM P11 IN )r� cr LP % Ict - -. - ,4 17L 77 I w. ITV717f V.. 51t r I AV V F rr-11 Alfr P1 *l., PUIU)N(A f MK5 A A-PX,.Aj,'A rv,T ri - C � U (..I To n IFT: I t I v n IFt: rl,.-,. vt r-F ,W,. A I 'NAH F F- ', Ir I I - r�Af, A I —i �'F'.G�'0`'EI,� C`L1LI71�L, — - F A t 'Ic Li 5LCI -10N A 5rE, -A ppl+ I711 A,� .1PocP ftL p�b . 1'_. 11 RG 11 It I I , 1r' J' I. I f! • I M I i [PI 14, b* I Atl 1 011 1: IN 51s �CTIOM 6-6yl I _71- "Oro 0 (L R!s 2 =01 8w z W, a ul 0 w IL z -n x r 0 w 5-2 CO W w Ck ARLHITWT BY, PRAMO NO. I 5P—I I C-CC 7— 0 Q) 7— P -* V" WPs[ I'Iila'Fr, f, LIAF. CFVFr\Frl =41. `1F.Y_I111 4c e�wre 7��� REvisioNs: A MIXED USE CONDOMINIUM / OFFICE BUILDING ° NO. DATE, DEscwpTlON, RSTONE BUILDING � 8 N q >m BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP �D an 400 DAVTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 126 - 4th AVENUE $N, EP40", WA. 46020 nN 425-775-0564 FAX:425-776-5746 ® Ll nm EMAIL. ButterfreldOesignQa HOME.COM GARAGE FLOOR PLAN �� Tors % B 5-6 X 096rz 0 z LU O Lu 3? O LLJ 9 §: In flill ljWU. Ilitt;A ilull. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K 3T c It U. ....... .......... it 41 tri .......... .............. I'llifLU. ....... ...... ........ �41V'If . .... it t I till M ultM ....... F'�AkcttlWh ............ ............. .............. ..... ... ............ ra -j' ------ CD pavAl ITT, Io k Iz.n1lu, 11X. h-JIM'O t4111(th 0 0 tn F'w4l' r'tlf( w. 7 h j ou r it] Ivo. 1:11"LlF. C [it PlIM, 1,11 SMI Is Ji z 5FCONP FLOOV F�M ARCHITECT OF RECORD ROeERT SvrnWazo VA'I' PROJECT MANAGER. Ith -ILY"i CM= '14 V'41 C= ;G DRAM SY, ;All tll X" JOB ANSM. DATE. XY"I)W)(X DRAWING NO. A_� 'P, \Grs % 1, s CL =) Q,o 0 gq It ( z !) z 1,;v, v 0 11�1 V, 1-," 3" w O O w jrU- z till VIIII-H IIAL r jIij Ill ( � ARCHITECT 11 t?(A ........... ............................. ....... I All vIII1 -0, ull I? lim rT�� G r}II 11- 17H H71 -W LL- V All 11111VIA I .... — kh ............... ............. ..... I ...... ...... ....... ................ . ................... ............... ....... .... ........ .. .. .. ...... ..... .... ...... ..................................................... .. ... ...... ... ... .. .... . . .... .... .. ... . ... .. .... . -� ci 8 ® r--- — I -- -- — (fit IVCD I :,t A it 1-11, 'JI It It I till, 14MM, it 10 z I o Al Yt.f' IRA X LL— E3- o lAtij it 13 =77 Iitill. fuli. III1v.ch I lilt U. -7 ull 11dirlp FL-00p, PUW VI.ALL -FaNr to lit, Ati'll , 41;1 1, I I..Wip'll ARCHITECT OF RECORD ROBERT BLrrTI!RPIELD PROJECT MANA&ER, SRD DRAM by, XXX Na-VIEFU xxxxxxxxxxxxxx DAM XX/XXI/XX MAHM NO. 106 Lfl r.L CIlu - iJ o A D 'n�° REV1510N5: A A n A n NO. DATE: DESCRIPTION: X Q X x. - A-- /��\\\ rn x x 3 x m � Q7 Q V p � A � rn An -- A�- 0 O O z PN:PLF'IL 14 -P, LFI U � l tO-.Ll.11 A MIXED USE CONDOMINIUM / OFFICE BUILDING GOPPER5TONE BU I LO I NG 128 - aCh tiVENUE SOUTH, EDMONpS, WA. g8020 BUILDING ELEVATIONS epcure �� € A� e BUTTERFIELD DESIGN GROUP ca 400 DAYTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 6uC� ? m , 425-775-0564 FAX: 425-776-5746 m EMAIL: BunerfreldDesign@HOME COM C 1V A c+ REVISIONS: A MIXED USE CONDOMINIUM / OFFICE BUILDING X A m � ni NO. DATE DESCRIPTION: GO�I i.+�✓TON �U I LD I NG :�'I �g ¢ A I z x u i ®BUTTERFIEID DESIGN GROUP a y pp 3 x z Ql 3 O e"' 400 DAYTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 Bu n' m x D M T 125 - 4th AVENUE 50UTH EDMOND5, NA. 40020 °° Z Y Y Y A A _ _ .m 425-775-0564 FAX: 425-77fi-5746 O x A T m 4� mA , EMAIL: Butterleld Design@HOME COM A s BU I LIB I NO ELEVATI ON5 �oo jig ;Q1 I !-I WrAM IN 11 A VAA FA I FAIMI YA NIPPON V_; C11,211:111 JI 11 Ill Ili 11111 all I;, 11. M P, P PIP MEN r_ M11 Pn.M5 iW cau'W5 AS UMION rF I I i i -I-- [ i w.,j ai=.. ;!I J'D ,Lxlli ...MINN MR Ifit, INN In W! If I B-1101.1 111 a It no'. till mistallillilli sit ............ 111115111111- 11114111111RIll 11 WON vIIIIIIIIIIIII Ll fill! islatillillislail 1111115111MININIMS ��TIi�,I'� ■ allII ANKRUWAIR 61114% ml a—.._.— ILI pq Mpg- %-tl MINN— low MAIN Histiollillailitill In11 1.1111,9PPM I IIIII R =11 -1111111 1� 'i •saYt at' �� ,�•�I �Ir� �li—,��—� Mod 11�N C11"I'vol A401WO'S kj �Jsfifim­'.­ "AtZilmoul, q.; -5 -11411!1 6111W M_ .e • ir IT. M, 1:141%,AW "'IrIll .1419119vallif :T ew I no. 471PTI, "tin 4 1010 .1 t.aw MN ......... ... sit, INIVI.....- Is .1 ;It P. III .... IS• IV In- tN 111111111211311,11IIIIIIA I., I stro� MWO1111141111 MITI" 0 1:111113 1119111111 - . I :I I It IT` "' wi "I", auln OEM IM, 111M I J fill, 1111.1­ till .9. fall, AA, I IN4111 IT 11116— !qjllllgllllllll I -A VIIMIw wilms Ills 111WIRM01.1112a. 1 1110 'o— I I?, � ■; -'Y!; �, '7P` It - • • MIT, IT im. . ..... 1-joull. L.U. jr 111wi"'ll i-mm-I IT .... .. ..... .... .... . wo "'Mm" "ITT MII Him 1i 4­11i 0 [Ta 4 -0 -,vc IN sualf.'Vi 111115114unma 14 1k Jim 0,51, ....... .... MISHU T, W-9 IF - I PAP T A I 17— I - T l riles A Ll I P ON 11M I71I I — VMS Not',it') (I.SUS'' I MEAN .......... JJL�— I mill. Nin IfN11 Iit1m11MViiMl�_R1n1M�11NOf1 .1'. ii.s.lia, Gi -1. lI1Y1-1111i i 161A1(iI1IIN16, . ......... . ...... ll ... . .............................. LM M 0 111611 Milli 011 3111191111 MIN 111112111 Bills milli Ins Mill mill I oil Bell" now, 10, L 11119 .. ...... ... ............ ........ ... .... ..... .. ... ... .. billowillielomt Empillonii L RIMMIUMBIRIMI tfii" u Be dihi"Gaaaafflolij lingunk"RiI ISHM nwi ........... Milk M 111111112111111111 Infinite illegielli..Illl 10 elms All I I a ....... of WIN ulml HHlmmmn fill, lsliell" It, 10 mo■ Bills it M-21MOMM = ------- Be n, M Magog I I Nm no n im -II® ............... T 71 T7 Ll vigil .... . . . ........... . ... mill ifiWWWwo"WiNgAiiii 1.191 MIMI=" lmisiollien, Wit 1111 01111101,11,111 Will. !.1. mills's Williams Ill pollt H ­124 mile ......... . ..... A siss A JIM K ry st U /I IMM Signage Proposal for FS Financial Strategies, LLC • November 6, 2007 Presented to The City of Edmonds The following proposal is presented for approval for the business residing at: 128 Fourth Avenue S. The design strategy for the signage (as consulted with the business owners) is to coordinate with the color scheme and style of the building and communicate the nature of the business in an elegant way. For the front of the building: We propose a sign consisting of 'A" P95 (frosted look) Plexiglas 60" wide x 13.5" tall bolted (8 lag bolts) to the shingles just above the apron on the front left bump out of the building. The sign will be no lower than 87" above the walkway. The logo will be displayed in polished brass dimensional letters (large FS caps in '/2" thick brass and the rest in '/4" thick). The letters will be attached to the Plexiglas with permanent adhesive. The Plexiglas will not have a color painted or applied to the back or front so as to have the green of • the shingles to show through. The bolts will be covered with gold colored caps to finish it off nicely. The sign is designed to not protrude at all beyond the apron lip. Nonetheless, all 4 corners will be rounded. It will be attached to the siding in the center of that 13 ft. front wall. The installer will use '/4" diameter lag bolts/screws approximately 2" in length which will then be firmly cemented into sheathing with (construction) adhesive. For the entry area: Option A — Preferred — we propose a small flag mount style sign. It will consist of 1/8" P95 Plexiglas with dark green colored vinyl covering the back and showing through the frosted look Plexiglas material. The logo will be displayed on front in Deluxe Gold vinyl. The left (protruding corners) will be rounded and the right edge will be screwed into the shingles (sheathing underneath) just behind the doorframe, near the top of the frame. The bracket will be a polished gold metal but will be mostly hidden by the doorframe. The size of the sign is 4" tall x 18" wide. The sign will be attached to the shingles at 8 1 " up from the walkway and 6" away fromC���IE® • back wall. The ceiling in that entry area is actually below 8 feet. NOV - 6 2007 BUILDING DEPT. • Option econd choice- If for me reason the flag mount sign cannot meet approva equirements, w propose as another option for directing clients to the of 1 a sign s. ilar in style to the front sign and mounted to the back wall over t ca box. The sign will consist of 1/8" P95 Plexiglas 6" x 22" wide with all orners, rounded. There will be no color or paint applied to the back the terial so that the green of the shingles shows through. The log and arrow ' be displayed on the front in Deluxe Gold vinyl. The sign ill be bolted to t shingle siding (sheathing underneath) with 6 lag bo s, approximately 66" u from the walkway. The bolts (same as those us for the front signage) will e covered with gold caps. No electricity will be used in displaying these signs. Respectfully submitted by, Susan Shoults Sign Consultant Mastermark • 206-762-9610 Enclosures include: Permit application — Form A Payment from FS Financial Strategies for the 2 signs requested PDF printouts of outdoor signs Color sketches onto elevations from architect Material samples or swatches, as available NOV m 6 2007 0 BUILDING DEPT. (M LO • W � 8 c ® r ,CS M e� • 4td bv- (AVI O O O co i Lail S �nb�s-�Wnow rrVM m r t � b + yr" to e 1. of I.T-l� ll ` + l J + I Y�if i. `: I `�� f i �l'� I i���� l l r i� l l-i ii i l If it l �}, -�i �l __..._.. _. _..._._- - . -���r1 IT:III� �,f1 _Il_��I-.l :. �11 �. ,l�;lllt,!,1 1,1� 1� ,1� �� �� �� �� �� �� , �� i �� I i� li I�..III.�.II.� 11..1�,ll,l.,�. rA 51.1 a —Mum FLOOR -PRE-FIN15HEP 5TONE VENEER • • I I O O O o6 T- .. M Y RECEI 1`s E'Ll Nov 13UILDING 0 .5116vio.- (mrqqjv7 <— �, 14 bj6p_5 b4 0 0 it I 68.51' 2nd FLOOR I TE 20:IT l A-11 51M. (o0.51' DATUM 5q.51' OFFICE FLOOR\'--- r A&I �, <x ! 2 CC) z co,m � 0 z m � N \ m • v f F`� UNIT 205 EXTERIOR I�EGK 1 PART11 AL z SCALE: 1/4"-I'�O" OFFICE GTION 9 FRO LO- • • 0 „LLZ' 6 RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2001 BUILDING DEPT. • • • VO%O61C iWAAmaoftmOI IIC wiWACAuto Editim UPC Wf�. AC and Apga! OM A„ D, C ,1 02006 Edition IMC WfWAC Ammdmcm [32006 Edition IPM W/WAC Amw&ncnU C32006 Edition IFC WIWAC Amaldmeab p2006 Edition VIAQ WAC 51-13 ®2006 Edition WSEC WAC 51-11 CITY OF EDMONDS BUIDING DEPARTMEW ADDRESS _- �� .. 4/a'Cn w Lb it Gw�T"� Fci,VF-® m®v - 6 2007 BUILDING DEPT. STREFT FILE Dimensional Lettering ITIounted on Building FasciaME t �r APPROVED BY PLANNING !`n r' 1/4 1" � Sign Details:�.Fabricate &Install'/z" routed black sintra with custom color face ��� � � /�®� 1/2" Pin mountedW.from�wall uftdmnotmmu� o Lager Copy "CAR FINDERS" -- ---- - - 391— Donoctmleoff fdrawi ywhnoug Smaller Cdpy ".OF EpMONDS, INC." W o �92� 5 o ; ,63 Gr —• ..s . •.` ra � W OA 202" --. fr i y r^' ►� 3 \ A Qtti�� a� cs) i Wa ob SCALE: 1.5" = 1'-0" .C Z.'. _V P. � ib 1/2" Black Sintra Lettering with 3M White Vinyl Covering Face. U I C pQ,� S. $ ad 00 C p Qgp 6'-2" off sidewalk ( The sign sets in 74" west of sidewalk.) 7 F� White Face 1 For If 0 Black Sides 'From Step - -- -- - - lottom of Sign) RESUB AUG 16 2006 N I C, J Customer approves: Colors Spelling Materials Location Proofs are property Customer: - CAROM J013#6900 p perty of Russell Sign Company and may not be reproduced in anyway without Notes: 10 consent from Russell Sign Company. All Proofs are for presentation and client approval only. Address: 128 4th Ave. So Suite 100, Edmonds,WA 98020 RUSSELL Artwork and designs are subject to a design fee. Contact: Marty Adams 425-771-9344 47 ' w -9022 Client Approval: Date: sip co. 529 208tSS903Sales: D. Russell Designer: Edward Landlord Approval: Date: ® 6h t W Ste. H Lynnwood, WA 86 425.775.7010 Fax 425.673.5508 Date: 7/21 /2006 Revision: I Scale: As Shown FILENAME: JOBS/Car Finders/Dimensional Lettering Any request for modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") must be specifically called out and identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. BUILDING DEPARTMENT WORK a ADDRESS OWNER APPROVED DATE 6LDG OFFICIAL 003 Edition IRC w/WAC Amendments 003 Edition IBC w/WAC Amendments 02003 Edition UPC w/WAC Amendments and Appendices A, B, Gt I 02003 Edition IMC w/WAC Amendments 02003 Edition IFGC w/WAC Amadments 02003 Edition IFC w/WAC AmWdW >" 02003 Edition VIAQ WAC 51.13 02004 Edition WSfiC WArw31-0 F[dA-- RESUB AUG 16 2006 PLANNING DATA STREETFILE -- Signs -- Name: C" F rl&Jjr&y Df e4MO n6t,5 Date: 08 • ®2- • 2.®® Site Address: &- "14 Aye, fi, 4 IUD Plan Check M BLD-2006- ® � Project Description: :L Vl f W Wall cyp 3 �1 ( c,�I A V1 A-6 Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES / NO) Z,_ Zoning: D C.-* Comprehensive Plan Designation: D-T ALA-. Cam+- d D-' Md XP,� bOMMfr C44 1 Map Page: `�0� [Corner Lot: (YES / Flag Lot: (YES / O) ADB File # (or date Aaived- 0 9.0 —0(v TOTAL Area per Type of Si n Type of Allowed in Matrix conditions Allowed area per Unit TOTAL sign area Proposed Sign zone? met? unit allowed for sign area this sign Example Wall w/interna/ Yes, with conditions Yes 1 sq. lt.//inea/ R. attached 41 It. attached wall 41 square feet 20 square feet illumination wall Sign #1 Waco �o MIS Sign #2 Sign #3 TOTAL Si n Area for Tenant/Site Max Permitted: ' U . Previous Total: V1 I -Tb A.. [proposed Total: • ((� Si n Height Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: t. Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Type: Max Permitted: Actual Height: Sign Lighting Sign Type: W Jkk Proposed: V1 ® V1 e.,, Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: Sign Type: Proposed: Allowed in Zone: • PLANNING DATA • 11 FILE 11 -- Signs -- Sign Colors Proposed: 1010e• 14. ri a W/ i 1 jT f-A C.-r, Acceptable? L6C Requires ADB Approval? r•® — a Sign Location If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks? N I Re wired Setbacks Street: M 9 A Side: Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks Street: N I A Side: Side: Rear: Landscaping for Freestanding Signs Size: W I A4 Location: Critical Areas Determination #: ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver A- Other Plan Review By: �n4 �ee«� PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION NEW MIXED USE BUILDING EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PREPARED FOR HAMMERWORKS, LLC NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Nff 17311 — 135`' Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 9 Fax (425) 481-2510 June 28, 2002 Mr. Collin Winters Hammerworks, LLC 210-5`h Avenue South, Suite 203 Edmonds, Washington 98020 ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation New Mixed -Use Building Edmonds, Washington NGA File No. 350502 Dear Mr. Winters: Snohomish County (425) 337-1669 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 We are pleased to submit one copy of this report titled "Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation — Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building — Edmonds, Washington." This report presents the results of our geologic and geotechnical engineering evaluation of your planned new mixed -use building in Edmonds, Washington. This report summarizes the existing subsurface conditions on the site and provides geotechnical recommendations for site development. It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Khaled M. Shawish, PE Senior Engineer Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building Edmonds, Washington INTRODUCTION This report represents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation and evaluation of the proposed Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located at 128 4`h Ave. South as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. The purpose of this investigation is to explore and characterize the soil conditions within the site, further our understanding of soil conditions, and provide recommendations for site development. For our use in preparing this report, we have been provided with an electronic copy of a site plan titled "Copperstone Building, 1284h Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020, Architectural Site Plan," prepared by Butterfield Design Group, dated May 5, 2002. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The lot is approximately 0.27 acres and we understand that you plan to build a 3-story building with eight condominium units occupying the upper 2 stories and retail space occupying the bottom floor, with accompanying paved access and parking. You have not indicated whether you expect retaining walls to be a part of the development. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the site subsurface conditions, and provide preliminary recommendations for site development. Specifically, our scope of services includes the following: 1. Review geologic and soils maps of the area. 2. Explore the site subsurface soil and ground water conditions with backhoe test pits. The backhoe to be subcontracted by us. 3. Provide recommendations for site grading and earthwork, including structural fill. 4. Provide recommendations for foundation support and slabs -on -grade. 5. Provide recommendations for lateral soil pressures. 6. Provide recommendations for drainage and erosion control. 1 1 1 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 2 7. Document the results of our explorations, findings, and recommendations in a written geotechnical report. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The project site is an approximately 0.27-acre, rectangular -shaped parcel. Site layout and planned improvements are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The site measures approximately 85 feet in the north -south direction and 140 feet in the east -west direction. The property is bordered to the north by a hobby shop and to the west by US Bank. The eastern and western property lines are bordered by 4`h Ave. South and a paved alley, respectively. The site is relatively flat with a gentle slope towards the west. An approximately 5-foot deep excavation is located in the middle of the northern half of the lot. We understand that this excavation is the result of the removal of a previously existing residence on this site. An old driveway is located off of 41h Ave. South. A pick-up truck and wooden trailer are located on the southwestern corner of the site. Excavated soil covered with plastic and wood from the demolished house is scattered around the site. The site is vegetated with field grass and wild flowers. We did not observe surface water on the site during our site visit on June 19, 2002. Subsurface Conditions Geology: The Preliminary Surficial Geologicp of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington, by Mackey Smith (Washington Department of Natural Resources of Geology and Earth Resources, 1975) was referenced for the geologic conditions at the site. The site is mapped as glacial till, which consists of an unsorted mixture of silt, sand and gravel. Outwash deposits, which consists of well -sorted sand and gravel, are also mapped in the area. Our explorations encountered silty sand, and sand and gravel consistent with the description of the glacial till and outwash deposits. Explorations: The subsurface conditions within the site were explored on June 19, 2002 by excavating 5 test pits to depths ranging from 7 to 9 feet below the existing surface using a backhoe. The approximate locations of our explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. A Geologist from Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. (NGA) was present during the explorations, examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, obtained samples of the different soil types, and maintained logs of the NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 3 test pits. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, presented in Figure 3. The logs of our test pits are attached to this report and are presented as Figures 4 and 5. We present a brief summary of the subsurface conditions in the following paragraphs. For a detailed description of the subsurface conditions, the logs of the test pits should be reviewed. We encountered approximately 0.3 to 0.8 foot of topsoil in all of the test pits, except for Test Pit 4, and the topsoil in Test Pit 3 was mixed with fill consisting of wood debris. In Test Pits 1, 2, 3, and 5, below the topsoil and fill, our explorations generally encountered approximately 6 feet of medium dense, orangish-brown, fine to medium sand with gravel and trace silt. Below this material, we encountered brownish -gray to gray, fine to medium sand with gravel. We interpreted these materials as outwash deposits. Below the outwash sands in Test Pits 1, 2, 3, and 5, we encountered approximately 3 feet of dense, brownish -gray, silty fine to medium sand with gravel and trace cobbles. We interpreted this material to be glacial till. Test Pit 4 was excavated in the area of the old residences footprint. We encountered 7 feet of silty sand with gravel, interpreted as glacial till. We also observed approximately 5 feet of outwash sand and gravel exposed in the wall of the removed residence excavation. All of the test pits were terminated in the glacial till. Hydrologic Conditions Ground water seepage was not encountered in any of the test pits. However, perched ground water conditions should be expected to develop on this site during the wetter times of the year. Perched water occurs when surface water infiltrates through less dense, more permeable soils and accumulates on top of the underlying, less permeable soils. The more permeable soils, in this case, consist of the topsoil and the outwash sands. The less permeable soils consist of the till deposits. Perched water does not represent a regional ground water "table" within the upper soil horizons. Perched water tends to vary spatially and is dependent upon the amount of rainfall. We would expect the amount of ground water to decrease during drier times of the year and increase during wetter periods. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 4 SENSITIVE AREA EVALUATION Seismic Hazard The project is located within Zone 3 of the Seismic Zone Map shown as Figure 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). This corresponds to a Seismic Zone Factor, Z, of 0.3. Since medium dense soils were encountered underlying the site, the site conditions best fit the UBC description for Soil Profile Type Sp. Hazards associated with seismic activity include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motion. Liquefaction is caused by a rise in pore pressures in a loose sand deposit beneath the ground water table. The medium dense to dense glacial till and outwash sands interpreted to underlie the site have a low potential for liquefaction or amplification of ground motion. Erosion Hazard The erosion hazard criteria used for determination of affected areas includes soil type, slope gradient, vegetation cover, and ground water conditions. The erosion sensitivity is related to vegetative cover and the specific surface soil types, which are related to the underlying geologic soil units. The Soil Survey, Snohomish County Area, Washington, by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) was reviewed to determine the erosion hazard of the on -site soils. The site surface soils were classified using the SCS classification system as Alderwood-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes. This map unit is on till areas and consists of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. This unit is listed as having slight erosion hazard after the soils are exposed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion, from a geotechnical standpoint, that the site is compatible with the planned development. Our explorations within the site indicate that the site is underlain by outwash sands and glacial till. These soils should provide adequate support for the planned structure. Medium dense or better soils should typically be encountered about 2 feet below the existing surface. We recommend that the structure be designed utilizing shallow foundations. Footings should extend through any loose surficial soil and be founded on the medium dense or better native soils or structural fill extending to these soils. This is discussed further in the Foundations sub -section of this report. The excavation NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 5 resulted from the removal of the previous residence that occupied the site should be cleaned of any debris and loose material and backfilled in accordance with the Structural Fill section of this report. A large portion of the on -site soils is considered moderately to highly moisture -sensitive and may disturb when wet. We recommend that construction take place during the drier summer months. However, if construction takes place during the wet season, additional expenses and delays may be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the export of on -site soil, the import of clean, granular soil for fill, and the need to place a blanket of rock spalls in the access roads, construction traffic areas, and paved areas prior to placing structural fill. The on -site soils may be used as structural fill provided they can be compacted to plan specifications. NGA should be retained to determine if the on - site soils can be used during construction. Erosion Control Measures The erosion hazard for the on -site soils is considered slight but will be dependent on how the site is graded and water is allowed to accumulate. Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be used to control erosion. Areas disturbed during construction should be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include diverting surface water away from the stripped areas. Silt fences or straw bales should be erected to prevent muddy water from leaving the site. Disturbed areas should be planted with vegetation as soon as practical. The vegetation should be maintained until established. The erosion potential of areas not stripped of vegetation should be minimal. Site Preparation and Grading The first step of site preparation should be to strip the topsoil, fill, or loose soils to expose medium dense ' or better native soils in foundation slab -on -grade and pavement areas. This stripped material should be removed from the site or stockpiled for later use as landscaping fill. The stripped material should not be used as structural fill. The exposed subgrade should then be compacted to a non -yielding condition. If the ground surface, after the stripping operation, should appear to be loose, it should be proofrolled and compacted to a non -yielding condition and then probed. Areas observed to pump or weave should be reworked to structural fill specifications or overexcavated and replaced with properly compacted structural fill or rock spalls. If significant surface water flow is encountered during construction, this flow 1 I NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 6 should be diverted around areas to be developed. Shallow ground water, if encountered, should be intercepted with cut off drains and routed outside of the planned grading area. If wet or soft subgrade conditions are encountered, alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. The prepared subgrade may be protected from disturbance by placing a blanket of rock spalls or imported sand and gravel in traffic and roadway areas. We can provide recommendations for alternative construction methods at the time of construction, if necessary. Foundations Conventional shallow spread foundations should be placed on undisturbed medium dense or better native soils or be supported on structural fill or rock spalls extending to those soils. Where less dense soils are encountered at footing bearing elevation, the subgrade should be overexcavated to expose suitable bearing soil. The overexcavation may be filled with structural fill, or the footing may be extended down to the bearing native soils. If footings are supported on structural fill, the fill zone should extend outside the edges of the footing a distance equal to one-half of the depth of overexcavation below the footing. Footings, including interior footings, should extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished ground surface for frost protection and bearing capacity considerations. Minimum foundation widths of 18 and 24 inches should be used for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. For foundations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of not more than 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for the footing design for footings founded on the medium dense or better outwash soils or structural fill extending to the native material. The foundation bearing soil should be evaluated by a representative of our firm. We should be consulted if higher bearing pressures are needed. Current Uniform Building Code (UBC) guidelines should be used when considering increased allowable bearing pressure for short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Potential foundation settlement using the recommended allowable bearing pressure is estimated to be less than 1 inch total and 1/2 inch differential between adjacent footings or across a distance of about 40 feet, based on our experience with similar projects. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 7 Lateral loads may be resisted by friction on the base of the footing and passive resistance against the subsurface portions of the foundation. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used to calculate the base friction and should be applied to the vertical dead load only. Passive resistance may be calculated as a triangular equivalent fluid pressure distribution. An equivalent fluid density of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) should be used for passive resistance design for a level ground surface adjacent to the footing. This level surface should extend to a distance equal to at least three times the depth to bearing of the footing. These recommended values incorporate safety factors of 1.5 and 2.0 applied to the estimated ultimate values for frictional and passive resistance, respectively. To achieve this value of passive resistance, the foundations should be poured "neat" against the native medium dense soils or compacted fill should be 1 used as backfill against the front of the footing. We recommend that the upper 1 foot of soil be neglected when calculating the passive resistance. Structural Fill General: Fill placed beneath foundations, pavement, or other settlement -sensitive structures should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. The area to receive the fill should be suitably prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection prior to beginning fill placement. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free -draining, granular soil, free of organics and other deleterious material and be well -graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported, all-weather fill should contain no more than about five percent fines (soil finer than U.S. No. 200 sieve, based on that fraction passing the U.S. 3/4-inch sieve). The use of on -site soils as structural fill will be dependent on moisture content and weather conditions. We should be retained to evaluate structural fill material prior to construction. Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of structural fill may proceed. All backfilling should be accomplished in uniform lifts up to 8 inches thick. Each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 8 building areas, and within 2 feet of pavement subgrade, should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D-1557 Compaction Test procedure. Fills more than 2 feet beneath pavement subgrades should be compacted to at least 90 percent of their maximum dry density. The moisture content of the soils to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum so that a readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction. Slab -on -Grade Slabs -on -grade should be supported on subgrade soils prepared as described in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection of this report. We recommend that all floor slabs be underlain by at least 6 inches of free -draining sand or gravel for use as a capillary break. We recommend that the capillary break be hydraulically connected to the footing drain system to allow free drainage from under the slab. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting (6-mil minimum), should be placed over the capillary break material. An additional 2-inch-thick sand blanket may be used to cover the vapor barrier. This sand blanket is to protect the vapor barrier membrane and to aid in curing the concrete. Retaining Walls The lateral pressure acting on subsurface retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement which can occur as backfill is placed, wall drainage conditions, and the inclination of the backfill. For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one thousandth of the height of the wall (active condition), soil pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing (at -rest condition). We recommend that walls supporting horizontal backfill and not subjected to hydrostatic forces be designed using a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that exerted by a fluid with a density of 40 pcf for yielding (active condition) walls, and 60 pcf for non -yielding (at -rest condition) walls. These recommended lateral earth pressures for level backfill are based on the assumption of a horizontal ground surface adjacent to the wall for a distance of at least the subsurface height of the wall, and do not account for surcharges. Additional lateral earth pressures should be considered for surcharge loads acting adjacent to subsurface walls and within a distance equal to the subsurface height of the wall. This would NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1 1 I 1 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 9 include the effects of surcharges such as traffic loads, floor slab loads, slopes or other surface loads. Surcharge effects should be considered, if appropriate. The lateral pressures on walls may be resisted by friction between the foundation and subgrade soil, and by passive resistance acting on the below -grade portion of the foundation. Recommendations for frictional and passive resistance to lateral loads are presented in the Foundations sub -section of this report. All wall backfill should be well -compacted as outlined in the Structural Fill subsection of this report. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures, due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch loose lifts and compacting it with small, hand -operated compactors within a distance behind the wall equal to at least one-half the height of the wall. Permanent drainage systems should be installed for retaining walls. We recommend that these drainage systems consist of an 18-inch-wide zone of clean (less than 3 percent fines), free -draining granular material placed along the back of the walls. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain material, or drainage composite may be used instead. We recommend that we be retained to evaluate the proposed wall drain backfill material for its suitability. The free -draining material should be placed up the back of the wall to within 1 foot of the ground surface. The top 1-foot should be a layer of compacted, low permeability soil to limit surface water infiltration and should be separated from the underlying free -draining material by a layer of visqueen or building paper. A rigid, perforated or slotted PVC drainpipe, having a minimum diameter of 4 inches, should be embedded in pea gravel or some other free -draining material wrapped in filter fabric at the base of the wall, along its entire length. This drainpipe should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point. Surface water drains and roof drains should not be connected to wall or footing drains. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 10 Site Drainage Surface Drainage: The finished ground surface should be graded such that storm water is directed to an appropriate storm water collection system. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where footings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building. We suggest that the finished ground be sloped at a minimum gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the building. Surface water should be collected by permanent catch basins and drain lines, and be discharged into an appropriate discharge system. Subsurface Drainage: We recommend the use of footing drains around structures and behind retaining walls. Footing drains should be installed at least 1 foot below planned finished floor elevation. The drains should consist of a minimum 4-inch-diameter, rigid, slotted or perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by free -draining material wrapped in a filter fabric. We recommend that the free -draining material consist of an 18-inch-wide zone of clean (less than 3 percent fines), granular material placed along the back of walls. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain material or drainage composite may also be used instead. The free -draining material should extend up the wall to 1 foot below the finished surface. The top foot of soil should consist of impermeable soil placed over plastic sheeting or building paper to minimize surface water or fines migration into the footing drain. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point with convenient cleanouts to prolong the useful life of the drains. Roof drains should not be connected to wall or footing drains. USE OF THIS REPORT NGA has prepared this report for Mr. Collin Winters of Hammerworks, LLC and his agents for use in the planning and design of the multi -use building planned on this site only. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the explorations and also with time. Our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the budget and schedule. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. ' Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 ' NGA File No. 350502 Page 11 ' We recommend that NGA be retained to provide monitoring and consultation services during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the ' explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. We should be contacted a minimum of one week prior to construction activities and could attend pre -construction meetings if requested. I Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance P, g � ' with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. 1 NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Hammerworks New Mixed -Use Building June 28, 2002 NGA File No. 350502 Page 12 It has been a pleasure to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 3a'�� Bala Dodoye-Alali Project Geologist OM*SH Yc�o,� N w� s E 12X V& Khaled M. Shawish, PE Senior Engineer BAD:KMS:Imn Three Copies Submitted Five Figures NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. I DALEY ST I rr�ePlr riAXl,Igt � � = laa aaa SPRAGUE } I iiACKG NS J rJLrl�i r ; l Pp SP EDernos = HILL it rltR .s r raa ` BELL Z ST of �� gyp' ��� n �',• rdi AI T % \'s'Ariar Lc y Sp PROJECT g .i gac i - - - 400 SITE ` rawcri ST i `n y ST 'E to LDER cq D°° a y ST ALDER " o aaa saa s Daa �'J. Qti/ UNION N m WALNUT � ! Oty/ OIL P�3°a HOLLY OR CEDAR ST Q HOWELL WY Cn MJUGNOLIA m Uta000MAM ST •C° Hp�t�Aw R L+ sDauct rL 4a taa ���1% o- HEMLOCK Q �L R 1�40 `� I pyiT q 5aa Vr LFYIREL LALRtL YY ~215TH_ ST r 5S Y CO T 1 AfdR7111A _ _ _ ST P I N E ST y 2CU PIM Sr �E � i DOIHT tDYlYtDS --- C3 l „ } e Q i 1 Pat pL i J MAKAH_ I `� rN a' ' a ao o¢ F R ST f DL FIR DL N o 5 aaa raa LCOOLA "' a `C eL a a d nrl RO EL M - 5T Yt E M ST s en Pa9 L YY i HIiCOMB Q * :�¢ Er }. �.At P� x ^ � 8 N .,40GyOnh Q I r I : BIRCH PLRC 02000 Thoma Bros. Mapsi Not to Scale I -i project NumDer 1 8/19/02 6/25/02 ADJ BAD 350502 Hammerworks New NELSON GEOTECHNICAL a Mixed -Use Building Vicinity Map NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Figure 1 17311-135th Ave. NE, A-500 Snohomish Co., (42S) 337-1889 WoodinMlle. WA 98072 Wenatchee/Chalon 509 784-2756 BY I CK I C 425 488-1889 Eae 481-2510 nelson eoleeh.eomW W J J Q W O z Ld w z z W U I TP-2 J' Reference: Site plan based on an electric site plan titled "Copperstone Building 128w 4th Avenue South, Edmonds, WA 98020, Architectural Site Plan" prepared by Butterfield Partnership Inc. dated 6/5/02. ill:;Ci A CONDOMINIUM/OFFICE BUILDING TP-3 PROPERTY LINE DRIVE THRU ACCESS FOR BANK ON ADJACENT PROPERTY Approximate location of existing excavation TP-5 LEGEND TP-1 Number and Approximate Location of Test Pit 0 20 40 Approximate Scale: 1 inch = 20 feet U 13 W V1 'A Q 0 H W f w U J U U = Z U j FW- W W W � p z N 54 z W W o Z 4 qz � Z O 7 w Cn Z U•:3 C: � m Q 3 Cn a" 4) E cn E a� Q cx c PRMCT NUMM 350502 DRAYMVIC Figure 2 11 1 1 11 11 1 C - UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE- GRAVEL CLEAN GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAINED GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% SOILS OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL NOA SIEVE WITH FINES GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND CLEAN SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND NO. 200 SIEVE MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE SAND SM SILTY SAND WITH FINES Sc CLAYEY SAND FINE- SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC ML SILT GRAINED CL CLAY LIQUID LIMIT ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SOILS LESS THAN 50% SILT AND CLAY MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT INORGANIC CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1) Field classification is based on Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to visual examination of soil in general the touch accordance with ASTM D 2488-93. Moist - Damp, but no visible water 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D 2487-93. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from 3) Descriptions of soil density or below water table consistency are based on interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. IN)I= 5/4/02 JCL 350502 Copperstone Building Soil Classification NELSON GEOTECHNICAL NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Figure 3 1731W�5thle, . NE. A-500 Snoh Nl4e/C-n (509) 784-2758 (425) 486-1669 Fc� 461-25/0 w.naleon eotxft.com my LOG OF EXPLORATION DEPTH (FEET) USC SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT ONE 0.0 - 0.3 TOPSOIL 0.3 - 2.3 SP ORAGISH-BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND TRACE SILT (LOOSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 2.3 - 5.0 SP-SM BROWNISH -GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 5.0-6.6 SP-SM BROWNISH -GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 6.6-8.5 SM BROWNISH -GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND IRON -OXIDE STAINING (DENSE TO VERY DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 4.5, 5.0, AND 8.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 8.5 FEET ON 6/19/02 TEST PIT TWO 0.0 - 0.8 TOPSOIL WITH ROOTS 0.8 - 3.0 SP-SM ORAGNISH-BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH SILT, GRAVEL, AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 3.0-6.5 SP BROWNISH -GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL, TRACE SILT, AND SILTY SAND CHUNKS (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 6.5 - 9.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (VERY DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED AT 7.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.0 FEET ON 6/19/02 TEST PIT THREE 0.0 - 0.7 TOPSOIL AND WOOD DEBRIS 0.7 - 3.0 SP ORANGISH-BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND TRACE SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 3.0 - 9.0 SM BROWNISH -GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL, IRON -OXIDE STAINING AND COBBLES (DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 2.0, 6.0, AND 9.0 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 9.0 FEET ON 6/19/02 TEST PIT FOUR 0.0-2.5 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH IRON -OXIDE STAINING, TRACE ROOTS, AND GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) 2.5-7.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL AND FINE TO MEDIUM SAND POCKETS (DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) SAMPLES WERE NOT COLLECTED GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 7.0 FEET ON 6/19/02 ADJ: BAD:LMN NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO 350502 FIGURE 4 LOG OF EXPLORATION DEPTH (FEET) USC SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT FIVE 0.0 - 0.8 TOPSOIL (LOOSE) 0.8 - 3.0 SP ORANGISH-BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 3.0 - 5.6 SP BROWNISH -GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (RECESSIONAL OUTWASH) 5.6 - 7.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (GLACIAL TILL) SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED AT 7.0 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 7.0 FEET ON 6/19/02 ADJ: BAD:LMN NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO 350502 FIGURE 5 LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Residential Property ?fourth Avenue Edmonds, Washington HAMMERWORKS I Tr- MILDING 0 ENVIRONMENTAL 11 Pi ASSOCIATES, INC. 1380 - 112' Avenue Northeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 455-9025 Office (888) 453-5394 Toll Free (425)455-2316 Fax February 19, 2002 Mr. Colin Winters Hammerworks 400 Dayton Street, Suite C Edmonds, Washington 98020 Subject: LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Residential Property 130 Fourth Avenue Edmonds, Washington Ladies and Gentlemen: JN 22045 Environmental Associates, Inc, has completed limited subsurface investigation of soil and groundwater at the subject property located in Edmonds, Washington. This report, prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated February 4, 2002, summarizes our approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are intended solely for your use and those of your representatives. Four (4) copies of this report are being distributed to you. No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior approval in writing. Additional copies are available for a small fee. Relying solely upon the information developed in the course of our study, and within the context of the limitations of the attached report of which this letter is a part, it would appear that areas of petroleum -impacted subsurface soil in exceedance of WDOE Method A cleanup levels exist on the subject property. These include the floor of the former tank excavation as well as previously excavated soil stockpiles. Additional discussions and recommendations are offered for your consideration in the attached report. Associate Offices: Oregon / San Francisco Bay Area Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this assignment. If you have any questions or if we may be of additional service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, ENVIRONMENTAL �S, INC. W Don W. Spencer, M.S , P.G., R.E.A. Principal EPA -Certified Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner I.D. # AM 48151 Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification #947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License:11464 (Oregon) License:876 (California) License:5195 (Illinois) License:0327 (Mississippi) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. n LIMITED SUBSURFACE.IWE,STIGATION Residential Property 130 Fourth Avenue Edmonds, Washington Prepared for: LJ Mr. Colin Winters Hammerworks 400 Dayton Street, Suite C Edmonds, Washington 98020 j Questions regarding this investigation, the conclusions reached and the recommendations given should be addressed to one of the following undersigned. Ryan K. Bixby Hydrogeologist 7 WDOE Registered Site Assessor CI�6W .. Don W. Spencer, Sc., P.G., R.E.A. Principal EPA -Certified Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner I.D. # AM 48151 Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification #947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License:11464 (Oregon) License:876 (California) License:5195 (Illinois) License:0327 (Mississippi) !J Reference Job Number: JN 22045 February 19, 2002 J ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION/SCOPE OF WORK.....................................5 Site Description....................................................5 Methodology/Scope of Work..........................................5 Geologic Setting...................................................5 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION..........................................6 SoilSampling.....................................................6 Laboratory Analysis / Results / Discussion...............................7 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS...................................8 LIMITATIONS.........................................................9 REFERENCES.........................................................9 TABLES Table 1 - Results of Laboratory Analyses - Soil PLATES Plate 1 - Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Site/Exploration Plan APPENDIX Appendix A - Laboratory Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 5 INTRODUCTION/SCOPE OF WORK SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of a vacant parcel located along Fourth Avenue South near downtown Edmonds, Washington. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1, appended herewith. According to the information you have provided to us, two (2) single-family residences were removed from the subject property in the summer of 2001. In the course of demolition, an underground storage tank (UST) containing heating oil was encountered. The UST, which measured approximately 7 feet in length and 3.5 feet in diameter, was reportedly excavated and set to the side ( of the excavation. The project supervisor advised us that approximately ten (10) gallons of oil was released onto the underlying soil when the UST was removed from the ground. It is our understanding that no soil sampling or testing was conducted at the time of the UST removal. METHODOLOGY/SCOPE OF WORK JYour expressed interests, which included the desire to conduct a preliminary quantitative evaluation of subsurface environmental soil conditions on the subject property proximal to the former tank locality, formed the basis for the following scope of work: • Observe the re -excavation of soil from the former location of a residential underground -� heating oil tank. • Collect and perform laboratory analyses on six (6) soil samples collected from the floor and sidewalls of the excavation and from the excavated stockpile. The number of samples collected was determined based on conditions encountered during our reconnaissance. • Analyze the collected soil and groundwater samples for diesel and motor oil range petroleum hydrocarbons using gas chromatography by method NWTPH-D Extended. • Prepare a summary report documenting our methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommendations. GEOLOGIC SETTING Physiographically, the subject site is situated on a gently rolling elevated plain. This plain, known as the Vashon Drift Plain, was formed during the last period of continental glaciation which ended approximately 13,500 years ago. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 6 Published maps for the site vicinity (Newcomb, 1952) suggest that much of the material underlying the northern portion of the subject site is non -glacial floodplain deposits overlying glacial till. The non -glacial floodplain deposits consist of interbedded sand, silt, clay and peat of the Whidbey Formation. Glacial till is a dense heterogenous mixture of silt, sand, and gravel. Typically, the till exhibits relatively low vertical hydraulic conductivity which frequently results in formation of a "perched" water table along its upper contact. The "perched" water table is frequently seasonal and derives recharge primarily from infiltration of precipitation through more permeable overlying soils. Topographically, the site is situated on a gentle westerly facing slope, approximately 50 feet above mean sea level. Based upon inference from topography and local drainage patterns, it appears that shallow -seated groundwater (if present) in the vicinity of the subject property may flow in a westerly direction. With respect to surface water resources, the northwest -trending incised drainage is situated approximately one-half mile to the northeast. Shelkberger Creek, which originates approximately three-quarters of a mile to the southeast discharges to a marsh approximately one -quarter mile to the south of the subject site. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION USOIL SAMPLING oOn February 5, 2002, Mr. Ryan Bixby of EAI observed the excavation of soil from the sidewalls and floor of the former UST hold and from the area to the south of the UST hold where soil appeared to have been impacted by the leaking tank after it was removed from the excavation. Approximately twenty (20) square feet of oil -stained soil was noted to the south of the former tank hold. Approximately nine (9) yards of soil was excavated and placed on a layer of plastic sheeting. Using a backhoe, soil was excavated from the former UST hold to a depth of approximately six (6) to eight (8) feet below ground surface (bgs). The uppermost three (3) feet of soil was removed from the area to the south of the UST hold where the tank appeared to have leaked onto the underlying soil. Soil encountered during the excavation consisted primarily of brown to gray sand, silt and gravel. Odors associated with petroleum products were detected in soil at each location. i--1 Using stainless steel hand sampling equipment, soil samples were collected from the floor and each of the four (4) sidewalls of the former UST hold and three (3) soil samples were collected from the excavated stockpile. Samples were transferred directly to sterilized glassware with teflon-sealed lids furnished by the project laboratory. Samples were stored in an iced chest at the site and taken to the laboratory in this condition in an effort to preserve sample integrity. Each jar was clearly labeled as ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 7 to the location and sample number, date, time, project, etc. EPA -recommended sample -management protocol, including maintenance of chain of custody documentation was observed at each stage of the project. LABORATORY ANALYSIS / RESULTS / DISCUSSION Laboratory Analysis Since petroleum products were the contaminants of concern, all soil samples selected for laboratory analysis were analyzed for diesel and motor oil range petroleum hydrocarbons by test method NWTPH-D/Extended. The three (3) soil samples collected from the excavated stockpile were composited into a single sample by the project laboratory. Labor Soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis from each boring were chosen on the basis of field screening measurements. The laboratory reports are appended at the end of this report. The following tables summarize the results of laboratory testing. Table 1 Laboratory Soil Testing Results - NWTPH-Diesel Extended All'results and limits in parts per million (pprb) Sample Name Diesel Range Motor Oil Range WW ND ND NW ND ND SW ND ND EW ND ND Floor 3,200 ND SP1, 2, 3 (Composite sample) 3,800 ND Reporting Limit' 20.0 50.0 Cleanup Level2 2,000 2,000 NOTES: 1 - "Reporting Limit' represents the laboratory lower quantitation limit. 2 - Method A soil cleanup levels as offered in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340-900 WAC. Shading denotes reported concentration exceeds the current WDOE Method A cleanup level. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 8 As summarized in Table 1 above and on the attached laboratory report (Appendix A), the soil samples submitted for analysis from the floor of the excavation and from the stockpile contained diesel -range petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations above Method A Cleanup Levels. None of the sidewall soil samples contained detectable concentrations of diesel -range contaminants. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS`. Relying upon the results of soil sampling and testing conducted in the course of this study by Environmental Associates, Inc. (EAI), it would appear that past use of an underground residential heating oil UST at the subject property has resulted in adverse impacts to subsurface soil conditions proximal to the UST's original location and possibly at other unexplored locations and/or depths. The full extent of the soil affected by the release of diesel -range petroleum products was not determined, nor was such a full determination envisioned in the proposed scope of work for this phase of activity. The following recommendations are offered for your consideration regarding the previously discussed detections of diesel fuel in site soil: • Several options exist for addressing the presence of petroleum products in subsurface soil, depending upon the risk tolerances and overall goals of the various parties involved. First of J all, a limited cleanup through excavation and off -site disposal of the impacted subsurface soils in the vicinity of the former UST hold and the surficial soils impacted by the release --I J from the removed UST could be accomplished in an attempt to bring these areas into compliance with Ecology's Method -A cleanup levels. Following removal of the contaminated soil, remaining soil should be sampled and submitted for laboratory analysis to confirm and document that all contaminated soil has been removed. Alternatively, impacted soil excavated during cleanup activities could be placed on an impermeable bermed barrier and "landfarmed" on the subject site until such time the levels of contamination detected in the soil drop to below cleanup levels, at which point the soil may be redistributed on the subject property. • With regard to compliance with state environmental regulations, there is a 90-day reporting requirement under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA; WAC 173-340). This MTCA requirement advises that any owner or operator who has information that a hazardous substance has been released to the environment at the owner or operators facility shall report such information to the department within 90 days of discovery (WAC 173-340-300). As summarized, the decision to report the site clearly lies with the owner / operator of the subject site and not the consultant. Submission of a copy of this report by the owner/operator to the department of Ecology would satisfy this requirement. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. l Hammerworks JN 22045 February 19, 2002 Page - 9 Decision making authority regarding implementation of the above referenced recommendations or other approaches clearly lies with the property owner and/or the lender, depending upon their individual risk tolerances. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Hammerworks, along with their several representatives for specific application to this site. Our work for this project was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated February 4, 2002. The separated sampling localities and conditions may vary between those locations or at other locations and depths. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If new information is developed in future site work which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., Environmental Associates, Inc., must be retained to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. REFERENCES Newcomb, R.C., 1952, Groundwater Resources of Snohomish County, Washington. Water dSupply Paper No. 1135, 133 pps., 2 plates, 6 tables, 19 figures. U.S. Geological Survey, 1953, Edmonds East, Washington 1:24,000 Quadrangle, Photorevised 1981, 1 sheet. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 'I 7• IYUL LL a . ' / % I J 300 '4WU J OT Wa r xMl 1ad, s f �J N, 36 1'k 4'k' Printed finraTOPOI 0199 N Probable direction of shallow -seated groundwater flow Approximate limits of subject property VICINITY MAP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Residential Property 130 Fourth Avenue South 1380 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. 300 Edmonds, Washington Bellevue, Washington 98004 Plate. Job Number: Date JN 22045 February 2002 0 J I ...............................I....................................... .......... ............ .........., .............a............. ; a Approximate location . of farmer US Approximate limits of UST excavation ' . NW ----------------------------- Former location Flo �, EW of on -site residence (basement excavated) . SP . SW Stockpiles SP2 Approximate location - Oil spill from excavated UST SP1 Stockpile c • Approximate links c of oil spill excavation WW Approximate location of soil samples collected on February 5, 2002 —04 Probable direction of shallow -seated groundwater flow : Approximate limits of subject property ENVIRONMENTAL -=` ASSOCIATES, INC. — —l- 1380 -112th Avenue N.E., Ste. 300 - Bellevue, Washington 98004 SITE/EXPLORATION PLAN Residential Property 130 Fourth Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Job Number: I Date: JN 22045 February 2002 APPENDIX A Laboratory Report ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Feb-12-02 11:40A TEG NW BELLEVUE ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957-072,1ax (AIM) 957411E134 ESN Job Number: 82D205-2 Clara: EAI Client Job Name: RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY Client Job Number. 22045 Pow: 2f)1200211:03 425 957-9904 P.01 KsroeeWiet fuel 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd 01* WFWI oil 20 nd nd nd nd nd 3,200 Heavy oil 50 nd nd nd nd nd nd 8 a recoveries: F 101% 90 IBM 101% C o•Terp" 102% 102% 103% 101% 102% C Dais Quslif1m and Analytical Comments nd • rA61 kFW reporting limits no . not arnlped C - ooe ww with $am* paala< M - matrix Intartersnos J • eslf Wod value Results reported on dry-YMQtd basis Aooaptabie Raoovo q Ilrnhw. 0% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Pegs 1 of 2 Feb-12-02 12:O1P TEG NW BELLEVUE 425 957-9904 P.01 EON SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (426) 957.9872, fax (425) 957-9904 ESN Job Number. 520205-2 Client: EAI Client Job Name: RESIDENTIAL PRO Client Job Number 22045 Printed: 21720D211:03 COMP COMP CQMP Kerowr lJet fuel 20 rid no OWWFuel oil 20 3,800 3,800 0% Heavy oil 5D nd no surrowe reoovvert": Fluorab4gmyl C o-Terphenyl C C Data QualHlers and Analytical Comments rid • not detected at listed cepottinp limb ne • not analped C • aodubm with sanvle peaks M - matrix Interference J - estimated vWAm Reaub reported an dry- a ght beefs Acceptable Recovery limits: 55%TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit; 35% Page 2 of 2 T2ANSGLOBAL - '.xe - ENVIRONMEIVfAI . `, CLIENT tip; �'; f; f t'i��. i .t �t� t ' �[ c �,C ADDRESS:_ —C c` ✓ c 1 t �� r ► PHONE. �ti #5'�� �� 7 �� IL FAX. CLIENT PROJECT # � PROJECT MANAGER._ ;X �! `e:` V"1.sk+,yCr_e,' D'A�E G't °PAGE._ PROJECT NAMEi� Iwj ACAl LOCATION. }r "►� �?S COLLECTOR: /�Y ' r`= i ='�f f ' OUDATEEMON Sample Number Depth Time Sample Type Container Type JOP JOPJOPS�i� r,Q�QQ'Z' ,�eqQ� NOTES E o E i 2. r 3. 5. i t. 6. c �. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. REC`N-50l (SHED BY (Si ature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY,(Signature) , DATE/TIME , SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: s'.. Turn Around Time: t G ,> r. MBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA RELINQUIS' ED BY (Signature) DATEITIME RECEIVED BVG(Signature) ` DATErrIME J" SEALS INTACT? Y/NMA RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTES: O TEG DISPOSAL Q $2.00 each 0 Return O Pickup .r. 6/24/2003 COPPERSTONE BUILDING-8 UNITS 12 #54 TH AVE SOUTH E MONDS WA TOTAL FIXTURES FIXTURES 2 WATER CLOSET -PUBLIC 20 WATER CLOSET -PRIVATE 30 LAVATORY 12 BATHTUB COMBINATION 8 SHOWER 8 KITCHEN DOMESTIC 8 DISHWASHER DOMESTIC 8 CLOTHESWASHER 1 HOSEBIB 1 OIL WATER SEPERATOR 8 WATER HEATERS 8 EXPANSION TANKS 1 PRV 1 DOUBLE CHECK VALVE 1 12 X 12 GARAGE DRAIN 5 AREA DRAINS 3 ROOF DRAINS 12 DECK DRAINS 1 WATER SERVICE COPPERSTONE-PR-FIXTURES ONEWAY PLUMBING INC BRETT MORTIMORE 425-487-4555 EXT #27 �1:lil RECEIVED E® +�' ? 5 2003 PERMIT COUNTER 6/24/2003 COPPERSTONE BUILDING-8 UNITS 128 4 TH AVE SOUTH EDMONDS WA TOTAL FIXTURES FIXTURES ONEWAY PLUMBING INC BRETT MORTIMORE 425-487-4555 EXT #27 FIXTURE UNITS TOTAL TOTAL H2O WASTE H2O WASTE 2 WATER CLOSET -PUBLIC 2.5 4 5 8 20 WATER CLOSET -PRIVATE 2.5 3 50 60 30 LAVATORY 1 1 30 30 12 BATHTUB COMBINATION 4 2 48 24 8_ SHOWER 2 2 16 16 8 KITCHEN DOMESTIC 1.5 2 12 16 8 DISHWASHER DOMESTIC 1.5 0 12 0 8 CLOTHESWASHER 4 3 32 24 1 HOSEBIB 2.5 0 2.5 0 1 OIL WATER SEPERATOR 0 6 0 6 207.5 184 H2O WASTE FU FU COPPERSTONE-PLANREVIEW 6/24/2003 COPPERSTONE BUILDING-8 UNITS ONEWAY PLUMBING INC 128 4 TH AVE SOUTH BRETT MORTIMORE EDMONDS WA 425-487-4555 EXT #27 TOTAL FIXTURES FIXTURE UNITS TOTAL TOTAL FIXTURES H2O WASTE H2O WASTE FIXTURE UNITS FOR UNITS #203,#204,#303&#304 PER UNIT 2 WATER CLOSET -PRIVATE 2.5 3 5 6 3 LAVATORY 1 1 3 3 1 BATHTUB COMBINATION 4 2 4 2 1 SHOWER 2 2 2 2 1 KITCHEN DOMESTIC 1.5 2 1.5 2 1 DISHWASHER DOMESTIC 1.5 0 1.5 0 1 CLOTHESWASHER 4 3 4 3 21 18 H2O WASTE FU FU �,eo , COPPERSTONE-PR UNIT X 6/24/2003 COPPERSTONE BUILDING-8 UNITS ONEWAY PLUMBING INC 128 4 TH AVE SOUTH BRETT MORTIMORE EDMONDS WA 425-487-4555 EXT #27 TOTAL FIXTURES FIXTURE UNITS TOTAL TOTAL FIXTURES H2O WASTE H2O WASTE FIXTURE UNITS FOR UNITS #201,#202,#301&#302 PER UNIT 3 WATER CLOSET -PRIVATE 2.5 3 7.5 9 4 LAVATORY 1 1 4 4 2 BATHTUB COMBINATION 4 2 8 4 1 SHOWER 2 2 2 2 1 KITCHEN DOMESTIC 1.5 2 1.5 2 1 DISHWASHER DOMESTIC 1.5 0 1.5 0 1 CLOTHESWASHER 4 3 4 3 28.5 24 H2O WASTE FU FU ova r COPPERSTONE-PR UNIT WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION Inch mm 1/2 15 3/4 20 1 25 TABLE 6-4 Water Supply Fixture Units (WSFU) and Minimum Fixture Branch Pipe Sizes3 Minimum Fixture Branch Appliances, Appurtenances or Fixtures2 Pipe Sizet.3 Bathtub or Combination Bath/Shower (fill) .............1/2" ...................... 3/4" Bathtub Fill Valve...........................................................3/4" Bidet...................................... 1/2' ................................ Clotheswasher.............................................................................. 1 /2" DentalUnit, cuspidor.................................................................... 1/2' Dishwasher, domestic ............... 1/2" Drinking Fountain or Watercooler...................................... 1/2• ........... Hose Bibb ........................... 1/2" Hose Bibb, each additional ..................................... 1/2" .................... Lavatory ........................................................................................ 1 /2" Lawn Sprinkler, each head4........................................... .............. Mobile Home, each (minimum)..................................................... Sinks Bar.............................................. 1/2" ClinicFaucet.............................................................................. 1/2" Clinic Flushometer Valve........................................................... with or without faucet............................................................. 1" Kitchen, domestic...................................................................... 1/2" Laundry..................................................................................... 1/2' Service or Mop Basin................................................................ 1/2" Washup, each set of faucets ..................................................... 1/2" Shower, per head......................................................................... 1/2" Urinal, 1.0 GPF Flushometer Valve .............................................. 3/4" Urinal, greater than 1.0 GPF Flushometer Valve " Urinal, flush tank........................................................................... 1/2' Washfountain, circular spray ........................................................ 3/4" Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank ............................................ 1/2" Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Tank ................................... 1/2" Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve .................................. 1' Water Closet, greater than 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank ........................ 1/2" Water Closet, greater than 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve .............. 1" Notes: Private Public 4.0 10.0 1.0 4.0 1.5 0.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 12.0 4.0 10.0 4.0 1.0 1.5 0.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 See Footnote 6 See Footnote 6 2.0 2.5 2.5 See Footnote 6 3.0 See Footnote 6 8.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.5 2.5 5.5 Table 6-4 I Assembly5 f- I f F f 0.75 F 1.0 F f 3.0 3.5 3.5 7.0 1. Size of the cold branch pipe, or both the hot and cold branch pipes. 2. Appliances, Appurtenances or Fixtures not included in this Table may be sized by reference to fixtures having a similar flow rate and frequency of use. 3. The listed minimum supply branch pipe sizes for individual fixtures are the nominal (I.D.) pipe size. 4. For fixtures or supply connections likely to impose continuous flow demands, determine the required flow in gallons per minute (GPM) and add it separately to the demand (in GPM) for the distribution system or portions thereof. S. Assembly [Public Use (See Table 4-1)]. 6. When sizing Flushometer systems see Section 610.10. 7. Reduced fixture unit loading for additional hose bibbs as used is to be used only when sizing total building demand and for pipe sizing when more than one hose bibb is supplied by a segment of water distributing pipe. The fixture branch to each hose bibb shall be sized on the basis of 2.5 fixture units. 55 Table 6-5 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE TABLE 6-5 Fixture Unit Table for Determining Water Pipe and Meter Sizes Pressure Range — 30 to 45 psi (207 to 310 kPa)** Meter Building and Supply Street and Service, Branches, Inches Inches 40 (12) 6 16 29 36 36 54 78 85 150 151 85 220 370 445 3/4 3/4 3/4 1 314 1 1-1/2 1 1-1/2 2 1 1-1/2 2 2 1/2*** 3/4 1 1 1-1/4 1-1/4 1-1/4 1-1/2 1-1/2 1-1/2 2 2 2 2-1/2 Maximum Allowable Length in Feet (meters) 60 80 500 (18) (24) (152) 5 4 0 16 14 4 25 23 8 31 27 10 33 31 16 47 42 17 68 57 18 84 79 28 124 105 31 129 129 32 85 85 61 205 190 85 327 292 96 418 390 220 100 150 200 250 300 400 (30) (46) (61) (76) (91) (122) 3 12 21 25 28 38 48 65 91 110 85 176 265 370 2 9 17 20 24 32 38 56 70 80 85 155 217 330 Pressure Range — 46 to 60 psi (317 to 414 kPa)** 1 6 15 17 23 28 32 48 57 64 85 138 185 300 1 5 13 15 21 25 28 43 49 53 82 127 :164 280 1 5 12 13 19 23 25 38 45 46 80 120 147 265 0 4 10 12 17 19 21 32 36 38 66 104 124 240 600 700 (183) (213) Inch mm 1/2 15 3/4 20 1 25 1-1/4 32 1-1/2 40 2 50 2-1/2 65 800 900 1000 (244) (274) (305) 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 2 1 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 6 13 12 12 11 11 14 12 12 11 11 15 12 12 11 11 26 22 21 20 20 26 23 21 20 20 27 23 21 20 20 57 52 49 46 43 70 61 57 54 51 70 61 57 54 51 198 175 158 143 133 3/4 1/2*** 7 7 6 5 4 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3/4 3/4 20 20 19 17 14 11 9 8 6 5 4 4 3 3 3 314 1 39 39 36 33 28 23 21 19 17 14 12 10 9 8 8 1 1 39 39 39 36 30 25 23 20 18 15 12 10 9 8 8 3/4 1-1/4 39 39 39 39 39 39 34 32 27 25 22 19 19 17 16 1 1-1/4 78 78 76 67 52 44 39 36 30 27 24 20 19 17 16 1-1/2 1-1/4 78 78 78 78 66 52 44 39 33 29 24 20 19 17 16 1 1-1/2 85 85 85 85 85 85 80 67 55 49 41 37 34 32 30 1-1/2 1-1/2 151 151 151 151 128 105 90 78 62 52 42 38 35 32 30 2 1-1/2 151 151 151 151 150 117 98 84 67 55 42 38 35 32 30 1 2 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 83 80 1-1/2 2 370 370 340 318 272 240 220 198 170 150 135 123 110 102 94 2 2 370 370 370 370 368 318 280 250 205 165 142 123 110 102 94 2 2-1/2 654 640 610 580 535 500 470 440 400 365 335 315 285 267 250 Pressure Range — Over 60 psi (414 kPa)** 3/4 1/2*** 7 7 7 6 5 4 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 3/4 3/4 20 20 20 20 17 13 11 10 8 7 6 6 5 4 4 3/4 1 39 39 39 39 35 30 27 24 21 17 14 13 12 12 11 1 1 39 39 39 39 38 32 29 26 22 18 14 13 12 12 11 3/4 1-1/4 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 34 28 26 25 23 22 21 1 1-1/4 78 78 78 78 74 62 53 47 39 31 26 25 23 22 21 1-1/2 1-1/4 78 78 78 78 78 74 65 54 43 34 26 25 23 22 21 1 1-1/2 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 81 64 51 48 46 43 40 1-1/2 1-1/2 151 151 151 151 151 151 130 113 88 73 51 51 46 43 40 2 1-1/2 151 151 151 151 151 151 142 122 98 82 64 51 46 43 40 1 2 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 1-1/2 2 370 370 370 370 360 335 305 282 212 187 172 153 141 129 70 370 370 370 370 370 370 340 288 245 204 172 153 141 129 2 2-1/2 654 654 654 654 654 650 610 570 510 460 430 404 380 356 329 **Available static pressure after head loss. ***Building supply, three-quarter (3/4) inch (20 mm) nominal size minimum. 56 Table 7-5 — 705.1 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE TABLE 7-5 Maximum Unit Loading and Maximum Length of Drainage and Vent Piping of Pipe, inches Maximum Units Drainage Pipings Vertical Maximum Length Drainage Piping Vertical, feet Horizontal (Unlimited) Vent Piping (See note) Horizontal and Vertical Maximum Units Maximum Lengths, feet -1/4 1-1/2 1 2 2-1/2 1 3 4 5 6 8 10 12 32) (40) (50) (65) (80) (100) 0251 (1501 t�nrn i��... 22 1163 I 323 1484 256 J 600 11380 13600 15600 111400 1 8 14 35 r9lA5 4285 7205 284n5 aaQn5 annns 45 1 65 1 85 1 148 1 212 300 1390 510 750 (14) (20) (26) (45) (65) (91) (119) (155) (228) 256 600 11531 80 3600 300 390 1750 91 119 155 228 1 Excluding trap arm. 2 Except sinks, urinals and dishwashers. 3 Except six -unit traps or water closets. 4 Only four (4) water closets or six -unit traps allowed on any vertical pipe or stack; and not to exceed three (3) water closets or six -unit traps on any horizontal branch or drain. 5 Based on one-fourth (1/4) inch per foot (20.9 mm/m) slope. For one -eighth (1/8) inch per foot (10.4 mMm) slope, multiply horizontal fixture units by a factor of 0.8. 1 83 24 48 84 45 60 120 180 212 14) (18) (371 aisi ra_ri Note: The diameter of an individual vent shall not be less than one and one-fourth (1-1/4) inches (31.8 mm) nor less than one-half (112) the diameter of the drain to which it is connected. Fixture unit load values for drainage and vent piping shall be computed from Tables 7-3 and 7-4. Not to exceed one-third (1/3) of the total permitted length of any vent may be limitatioinstalled In nsspecified horizontal position. When vents are increased one (1) pipe size for their entire length, the maximum length in this table do not apply. 705.0 Joints and Connections 705.1 Types of Joints 705.1.1 Caulked Joints. Caulked joints for cast iron bell -and -spigot soil pipe and other similar joints shall be firmly packed with oakum or hemp and filled with molten lead to a depth of not less than one (1) inch (25.4 mm). The lead shall be caulked thoroughly at the inside and outside edges of the joint. After caulking, the finished joint shall not extend more than one - eighth (1/8) inch (3.2 mm) below the rim of the hub. No paint, varnish, or other coatings shall be permitted on the joining material until after the joint has been tested and approved. Caulked joints in cast iron bell -and -spigot water piping shall be made with non -toxic materials. 705.1.2 Cement Mortar Joints. Except for repairs and connections to existing lines constructed with such joints, cement mortar joints shall be prohibited on building sewers. 705.1.3 Burned Lead Joints. Burned (welded) lead joints shall be lapped and the lead shall be fused together to form a uniform weld at least as thick as the lead being joined. C- 705.1.4 Asbestos Cement Sewer Pipe Joints. Joints in asbestos cement pipe shall be a sleeve coupling of the same composition as the pipe or of other approved materials, and sealed with rubber rings or joined by an approved type compression coupling. joints between asbestos cement pipe and other approved pipe shall be made by means of an approved adapter coupling. 705.1.5 Packing Additives Prohibited. The addition of leak sealing additives to joint packing shall be prohibited. 705.1.6 Molded Rubber Coupling Joints. When pipe is joined by means of molded rubber coupling joints, such joints shall conform to approved standards and shall not be considered as slip joints. When required, appropriate rubber bushings shall be used to allow for any difference in piping material diameters. 705.1.7 Elastomeric Gasketed and Rubber - Ring Joints. Elastomeric gasketed and rubber - ring joints shall comply with the applicable Installation Standard listed in Appendix I. 705.1.8 Shielded Coupling Joints. When piping systems are joined by means of shielded Table 7-3 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE TABLE 7-3 nc mm Drainage Fixture Unit Values (DFU) 1-1/4 32 1-1/2 40 2 50 Min. Size 2-1/2 65 Trap and Plumbing Appliance, Appurtenance or Fixture 3 80 Trap Arm? Bathtub or Combination Bath/Shower Private Public Assembly" ........................................ 1-1 /2" �► Bidet ........................................................ 2.0 2.0 Bidet .......................... 1.0 1-1/2" Clothes Washer, domestic, standpipes 2.0 ......................... . 2" Dental Unit cuspidor ........... 30 . 3.0 3.0 Dishwasher, domestic, with independent drain 1.0 1.0 1-1/2'2 Drinking Fountain or Watercooler (per head) 2.5 2.0 2.0 . Food -waste -grinder, commercial ..•"•'•"•"""""••..••.1 0.5 0.5 1.0 24 Floor Drain, emergency 3.5 3 0 3.0 ......................................... 2 Floor Drain (for additional sizes see Section 0.0 0.0 702) ...................... Z, Shower single head trap2•0 2.0 2.0 Multi -head, each additional ........................... 2•0 2.0 --► Lavatory, single ...................... 1-1/4" --► Lavatory in sets of two or three 1.0 1.0 1.0 ................................................... .....................1-1/2" Washfountain 2.0 2.0 2.0 ..............................................................................1-1 /2" Washfountain.............................................................................. 2.0 2.0 2" --► Mobile Home, trap 3.0 3.0 Receptor, indirect wastelr3 "'•""' .........................................................1-1 /2" Receptor, indirect wastel,a See footnote 1,3 .............. 2" Receptor, indirect wastel See footnote 1,4 Sinks 3" See footnote 1 -► Bar...........................................................................................1-1/2' Bar..........................................................................................1-1/2"2 1.0 Clinical... 2•0 2.0 Commercial with food waste ....................................................1-1/2"2 Special Purpose P rpose 3.0 3.0 ;.� .......................................................................1-1/2" Special Purpose....................................................................... 2.0 3.0 =� 3.0 2° Special Purpose3 0 4•0 "► Kitchen domestic ""'•"' 3 6.0 6.0 (with or without food -waste -grinder and/or dishwasher) 2.0 Laundry ................................. ......... . ..........................1-1/2" I (with or without discharge from a clothes washer) 2.0 Service or Mop Basin ............................................................... 2" Service or Mop Basin............................................................... 3.0 3.0 3" Service, flushing rim 3•0 3.0 Wash, each set of faucets 6.0 Urinal, integral trap 1.0 GPF2 ................ Urinal, integral trap greater than 1.0 GPF 2.0 2•0 ....................... ••""'•"" � Urinal, exposed trap P p....................................................................1-1/2"2 2 •0 2.0 6.0 6.0 "► Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank" 2.0 2.0 5.0 ......................................... 3" Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Tank" 3.0 4.0 6.0 ................................ 3" Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve" " 3.0 4.0 6.0 i Water Closet, greater than 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank" 3" 3.0 .0 Water Closet, greater than 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve" 4.0 60 6 8.0 0 3" 1. Indirect waste receptors shall be sized based on the total drainage capacity of the fixtures that 4.0 drain .0 6. 8.0 2. Provide a 2' (51 mm) minimum drain. therein to, in accordance with Table 7-4. 3. For refrigerators, coffee ums, water stations, and similar low demands. 4. For commercial sinks, dishwashers, and similar moderate or heavy demands. S. Buildings having a clothes washing area with clothes washers in a battery of three (3) or more purposes of sizing common horizontal and vertical drainage piping. clothes washers shall be rated at six (6) fixture units each for 6. Water closets shall be computed as six (6) fixture units when determining septic tank sizes based 7. Trap sizes shall not be increased to the on Appendix K of this Code. point where the fixture discharge may be inadequate to maintain their self -scouring properties. 8. Assembly (Public use (See Table 4-1)). 62 / -♦ � Us pe- DRAINAGE REPORT FOR: Copperstone Building CGE Project No. 01136.20 June 4, 2002 EXPIRES 11/7 762 - 6 y o c 4w ENGINEERING 250 41h Avenue South, Suite 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 778 - 8500 7 STREET FILE BUILDING DEPT. Table of Contents Copperstone Building Section 1 Existing Conditions and Project Overview Section 2 Project Design Section 3 Water Quality Section 4 Downstream Analysis Section 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Appendix A Design Parameters Appendix B Drainage Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS and PROJECT OVERVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS and PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project site is located in the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, Section 25, Willamette Meridian, in Edmonds, WA. The site is currently accessed by 41h Avenue South. The project site is a combination of two lots. Each lot is developed with single-family residences. The surrounding development is mixed use. The development in the vicinity includes banks, small restaurants, condominiums and residential homes converted into small businesses Existing vegetation is grass landscaping. The site consists of a single basin that slopes westerly at approximately 4.00 percent. The site soils are an Alderwood series. Offsite runoff does not flow onto the subject site from neighboring yard landscaping. No defined drainage channels were observed entering t e site from an upstream basin. Development would encompass the 0.26-acre site. The residences and other structures on -site will be demolished. A mixed used building will be constructed encompassing the entire site area. Parking for the tenants of the building will be in a basement -parking garage. Frontage improvements will include curb, gutter and sidewalk with a landscaping strip. The frontage improvements will be constructed along the property frontage along 4`h Avenue South. The paved alley will be improved the full width of the alley from the north boundary to the south boundary of the site. PROJECT DESIGN PROJECT DESIGN The City of Edmonds was referenced for the project site design criteria. The site consists of one drainage basin, primarily of building roof area. Stormwater from the roof area will be collected by a detention pipe located under the parking lot slab in the underground parking garage. The detention pipe will collect and detain the stormwater runoff at a controlled release rate. The flow control structure and pipe volume were calculated to control the flow for the predeveloped 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour design r' storm event. A 30 percent factor of safety is added to the calculated volume for the final sizing of the detention pipe. Calculations are included in Appendix B. r Floor drains will collect foundation drains and parking lot runoff. The floor drains will be routed to an oil water separator. The oil water separator will discharge into the existing sanitary sewer line in the alley. WATER QUALITY WATER QUALITY Water quality for the site is not warranted. The impervious surface subject to pollutants includes the driveways/garages. This area will pass through an oil water separator prior to discharging into the existing sanitary sewer line in the alley. The alley will be improved along the property limits of the site. This area is impervious area in existing conditions and is not subject to water quality treatment. DOWNSTREAMANALYSIS DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS The downstream drainage system for the subject site was investigated for approximately '/4 mile on October 9, 2001. Weather conditions for the weeks prior to the investigation consisted of sunny, cool weather. The extent of the drainage system consisted entirely of underground conveyance system. Observations of this system are therefore limited to evidence of overtopping or flooding and/or silted or clogged structures. The downstream conveyance system generally runs west in Dayton Street. It turns south at 3rd Avenue South. There was no evidence of overtopping or flooding. The catch basins were clear of debris. The downstream manholes at the intersection of Dayton Street and 3rd Avenue South had fast flowing runoff. The pipes were 18-inch pipes and were not running completely full. The manholes were approximately 4.5-feet deep and appeared to functioning properly. The downstream system appeared in good condition. EROSIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL EROSION and SEDIMENT CONTROL Erosion control measures will include a construction entrance, filter fabric fence on the downstream property limits of the site and catch basin inlet protection. APPENDIX A SEE 163 MAP 454 F vG H ,] I I ! i I RR N 4 RD I 7 FREDERICK PL d� < SNDVYISH - _. COUNIY .• _. ... ,� . 179TH PL0 12i Sw J '^ 181ST SET _, 3 �,`S c OVERLOOK PK + `LI c PL Sw al q ST S4a C7 h S' a f.c . I - RI< I i85TH PL SW __ m'= lesTH , Sr a I: (- 1 HUTT :; s Jti� PK :.� s NL S. 86TH PL SWI 187TH IBM ST <' PL SW _h87T 198TH 5rn18 �l �+ ]a7T4 ' e4 �'`� "� 3— I ST SW ST Sw I �a2.{b S9 yOJ = 189TH S Sw logn I c _ ti E BIY,KPL 19CrtH WATER / T o tX ST SW < < 190TH ST SW 1P CHERRY ST ti`p sa N 19 sT s31SA 492INJ S sraaeL . `. ;` l m Epp ¢ x!q�a _G3 .o sr aaTH ° two�r� t y f FOREDEL rn1 t97aR�l OR _ ,i �Z/O I I 194iM Pt sr I< �I a �= DR p b��, xGp4N0 4� I M-P! i tST - t9•TM ,,F �1 TM U 6 LxccL5loR 9 t e9 r °L I -a sl 3 11 19 PL w vL m IP IsT I 196TH ST r 196TH t PUGET PU ET _ ;' DR sr sW -;,', MELODY LN Wy� _ al `; _ _ +% lqP 19 I_. L = SIT sr/L P� -- >� 'TB �3I1 VIAND m 0 ' c BROOKHERE I HINDLEY _ LN I 1 nILW BROOKNERE ST 199TN i I 3iciP, sT ? 'O\� HpP�""�. =, z 1 5T SW - o �ASP z m E S $T v1EWNDDRi :----- ---- I si. s ° amI w I I 1 ILTNER LII VISTA cCG J $ATER LN' PL B ETTS 1�aHA 4r ALA" NpMT.IN VISTA WY 200TH ST SW Q cAXIDE , 201ST PL: m ¢�!,S�T� P/Q x oaowm B NG /O� z(�RDL '< _T ] Q II < ST�' uaoL IERRA :I t �y'_ 202ND - �mzNo vtt si $T SM al=i <'zozNo oLsl+ I' jl$ GLENE+ s1ERRA I sT �.�' -I= a m1_' 203C ST1-"GLEN v+I 20��_�p� 3� I I S4 ^l oL mvm °L,rw— = 1 ' a m C'204TN Sr yam; , FF � y DALEY -< cRa: rrA1 IVIC ST . a� 2'J o 20etH c; L �I 'I �ti GI s's4 sl 19 m' a .Y ;'\ Q/ xI ACTR SPRAGUE al 'ST cl -�~� I jl +srH,' 31- a PINE- nsTMsi G PARK ;Mxl �_ Po ST + ' EDMONDS = HUM! N HILL PK ST " ? and aJl RIDGE <;Z06TH 1 13 PK rn PNRx —' °4� ♦ " ELL �, ST ri = t o BELL zmrH oIST SWI - n1- i m' n!L ` ! x1oE/ " hr ti'p dII� ot—rc ° a/♦"/�„,sTl I 207TH PO - n I DR I2�1 PL s4 ,a ♦ aucx :VV?'4r� ES /[N Ivs i+IAIN I' gT IDL S4 , co 291 S IIFlLn N lRxwrrc IT OAYTON ue ■ rAr ST con cTR ..' 95m 9GE� �' _ .. G 1n ST ml I °L n. I NI I : i W (al ` 2088TH PLI a '709TH �P = i1GG ..1 N a' 'N MAPLE. a Sr.MEAVRIAL w.PLE W YOST I` PL 2 �5I'' S SW /23 3 ALSER 'al ,n - QI� an ' - 1 PARK it =10$�,Io�TMN=l ai z„ Pam/ d UNION I I N Q m �I WALNU // I= / S I 'B ISH(! o z12TH m mf I MOLLY OR I I/ 1Q OIL N v CEDAR a HOWELL WY nlNNuo u I a' ST CEDAR 7l' '�QO PARK RO��� - S 16 ST a- SW PRUELIr Ih 1 �i= ?/ MARSH !p __ E1nD �-15PRU 5?NCE DR�I QI itl °L Q UNOI �Q 'Z SPRUCE _ 1ST r / a ��PLOnEE `" m 3 ml 213TH Sr IQ x,a �6 •P I ;J ECl 214TH PL SW SY Ci vI HEMLOCK I HEMLOCK QI 4Y ST oI {lu0.f�-! .i l�YI 1 al<9z al y' A TW 215TH ST I' \� CI ERBEI ¢ i- ,WmEL rr '4i xl- .1 LAUREL 2'aTH SW �i `. 21cTH TL'4 215TH S P7� 5y �,a. 215TH �� 1- SW _ � DR 1-' - W PARK ST i ; -_t= ¢ = 3 ,'-. 215TH PL SW31 _ � z15� . a TI $I � = R - _ I . �I I v+•pRSYTH� _ �; a.. -. QI = ml .��I - I 1 217TH ST SW - i I uT LN ¢ �I I H- FIR( HI Q F R I I ST! - - a;; I . 217H 7L 4 <i �''I i _;: —� 6i m 218TH ST _ =0, - SW m. 2 Fla Du I _m!25, ''- ¢' "' - 1 _�zlenla�° � -1 SW cl'i— ^ 30 BELLA COOLA =`_Q' — EL{, ST ST _41 220TH'`�� a CC �L SST �! m 219TH sT' m <I SW 5 is=o. RD n EIM ST j - 3' IIS Z I _Ia .. _' I _ a;l L, 5� 22911 {' ; _1's :7. ¢ < m 'v =1 yl. < (:n +r Z s: ,WNW c of _ i PL � N a I (BIRCH _8� BIRCH=- "'.` •PL - ; ,c� ;, ) _�,, `.? s4. - : s+ c :2N p�l^g sW cl a s 5T s a �/ �,:y :3TH s\ :r i'a`:i o MI �i =z_�I 91 J E P rVESN4"IRp r,°A J a j,xx Si I :A4� �: ur» n :Na Sr al 224TH t- 7 0 SEE\ 17 1 ! MAP inn—r I 1JVIrli ilrCCl J/7 cn rn This soil Survey map was compiled by the U.S Department of Aaricullure, Sall Cons—stlon Semice, and cooporsting agencies. Best maps na orthophotot aphs prepared by the Stale of Washlngton. Department of Natwat Resources from 1973 and 1974 ee111110hologrephy. _ � �� � """"""a""""^""'s` ��++•�+�+. �w..z.w.r,...rw.�„ Coordinate grid Mks and land didsion comers. It sh—n, ua anorodma ulr MSllloned STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Table III-1.3 SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban tanei „ao fir Tvae lA rainfall distribution. 24-hour storm duration. LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURIE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP A B C D Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush & grasslands 74 82 89 92 Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. Good condition: grass cover on z75% of the 68 80 86 90 area Fair condition: grass cover on 50-75% of 77 85 90 92 the area Gravel roads & parking lots: 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads & parking lots: 72 82 87 89 Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: - lakes, wetlands, ponds etc. 100 100 100 100 Single family residential(2): Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre %Impervious(3) Separate curve number 1.0 DU/GA 15 shall be selected for 1.5 DU/GA 20 pervious & impervious 2.0 DU/GA 25 portions of the site 2.5 DU/GA 30 or basin 3.0 DU/GA 34 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 PUD's, condos, apartments, %impervious commercial businesses & must be industrial areas computed (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. III-1-12 FEBRUARY, 1992 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN Table III-1.4 "n" AND "k" Values Used in Time Calculations for Hydrographs "n," Sheet Flow Equation Manning's Values (for the initial 300 ft. of. travel) n. Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt, gravel, or bare hand packed soil) 0.011 Fallow fields or loose soil surface (no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soil with residue cover (s<_ 0.20 ft/ft) 0.06 Cultivated soil with residue cover (s> 0.20 ft/ft) Short prairie grass and lawns 0.15 Dense grasses Bermuda grass 0.41 Range (natural) 0.13 Woods or forest with light underbrush 0.40 Woods or forest with dense underbrush 0.80 *Manning values for sheet flow only, from Overton and Meadows 1976 (See TR-55, 1986) "k" Values Used in Travel Time/Time of Concentration Calculations Shallow Concentrated Flow (After the initial 300 ft. of sheet flow, R = 0.1) k, 1. Forest with heavy ground litter and meadows (n = 0.10) 3 2. Brushy ground with some trees (n = 0.060) 5 3. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n = 0.040) 8 4. High grass (n = 0.035) 9 S. Short grass, pasture and lawns (n = 0.030) 11 6. Nearly bare ground (n = 0.25) 13 7. Paved and gravel areas (n = 0.012) 27 Channel Flow (intermittent) (At the beginning of visible channels R = 0.2) kc 1. Forested swale with heavy ground litter (n = 0.10) 5 2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed (n = 0.050) 10 3. Rock -lined waterway (n = 0.035) 15 4. Grassed waterway (n = 0.030) 17 S. Earth -lined waterway (n = 0.025) 20 6. CMP pipe (n = 0.024) 21 7. Concrete pipe (0.012) 42 8. Other waterways and pipe 0.508/n Channel Flow (Continuous stream, R = 0.4) kc 9. Meandering stream with some pools (n = 0.040) 20 10. Rock -lined stream (n = 0.035) 23 11. Grass -lined stream (n = 0.030) 27 12. Other streams, man-made channels and pipe 0.807/n** III-1-16 FEBRUARY, 1992 APPENDIX B Stormwater Calculations Summary The following is a summary of the calculations that were derived using the SBUH Method: Total Area = 0.26-acres Existing Conditions Area ac C Pervious 0.20 86** Impervious* 0.06 98 Tc= 14.47 minutes * No credit was given in drainage calcs for existing impervious surface ** CN of 81 (2°d growth forest) was used to calculate existing runoff Developed Conditions Area ac) Pervious 0.00 Impervious 0.26 Tc=5 minutes (Assumed minimum) Peak Flows: Event Rainfall (in/hr) 2-year 1.5 10-year 2.0 100-year 3.0 Storage Volume Required for Routing C 86 98 Pre-Dev Peak Flow Ws) 0.01 0.02 0.07 Dev. Peak Flow (cfs) 0.10 0.13 0.20 Event Orifice Size and Ht Vol. Reg'd (cf) Vol. Prov.(cf) w/ 30% F.S. 2-year 0.51 inch @ 0.0 feet 540 702 10-year 0.56 inch @ 2.60 feet 690 897 100-year 1.45 inch @ 3.35 feet 842 1,094 Storage Tank Sizing 4' x 4' x 68.5' vault = 1,096 cf Time of Concentration Sheet Flow Segment 1 L 136 ft ns 0.15 Pz 1.50 in So 0.035 ft/ft 14.47 min Short praire grass of lawn Sheet Flow segment 2 L 0 ft Not used n5 0.40 Pz 1.55 in So 0.044 ft/ft 0.00 min Shallow Concentrated Flow L 0 ft Not used k5 3 ft/s na So 0.046 ft/ft 0.00 min Total = 14.47 min existing.txt KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21B 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERRV�), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 y DATA PRINT-OUT: 0 7 f? AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 81.0 .0 98.0 14.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .01 8.00 296 ' ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: Page 1 existing.txt AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 81.0 .0 98.0 14.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .02 7.83 569 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE -IA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO:, 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .3 81.0 .0 98.0 14.0 PEAKr- Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) .07 7.83 1236 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21B 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: Stop - Program terminated. Page 2 developed.txt KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21E 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 2-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 v DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)' A CN A CN 3 _ .0 81.0 .3 98.0 5.0 PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) rr 10 7.67 1208 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: Page 1 developed.txt AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) A CN A CN .3 .0 81.0 .3 98.0 5.0 f' PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT) 13 7.67 1674 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.eXt] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP STORM OPTIONS: 1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA 2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM 3 - STORM DATA FILE SPECIFY STORM OPTION: S.C.S. TYPE -IA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ******************** ********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP. ********* ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO. 1 DATA PRINT-OUT: AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES) / .3 A CN .0 81.0 A CN .3 98.0 5.0 �f2(EAK-Q(CFS) 20 T-PEAK(HRS) 7.67 VOL(CU-FT) 2612 ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH: SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21B 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: Stop - Program terminated. Page 2 detention.txt KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21E 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY: 1 - POND 4 - INFILTRATION POND 2 - TANK 5 - INFILTRATION TANK 3 - VAULT 6 - GRAVEL TRENCH/BED ENTER: EFFECTIVE STORAGE DEPTH(ft) BEFORE OVERFLOW ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH: PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK = .20 CFS ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE(CfS): ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIMUM): ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1: ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(CfS): ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 2: ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(CfS): ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAMETER(in) RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW = .07 FT SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y - YES, N - NO SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS 1) TYPE OF FACILITY: VAULT 2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 4.00 3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): .00 4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: d100yr 5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(Cfs): .07 6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 2 IZ TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: d2yr TARGET RELEASE(CfS): .01 TEST HYD 2 FILENAME: d10yr TARGET RELEASE(CfS): .02 7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 3, 4.00, 12 8) ITERATION DISPLAY: YES Page 1 0 detention.txt ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED): INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 1044 CU-FT BOTTOM ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS) DIA.= .51 INCHES MIDDLE ORIFICE: ENTER Q-MAX(CfS), HEIGHT(ft) DIA.= .56 INCHES TOP ORIFICE: ENTER HEIGHT(ft) DIA.= 1.45 INCHES ITERATION COMPUTATION BEGINS... TRIAL BOTTOM -AREA STOR-AVAIL STOR-USED PK-STAGE PK-OUTFLOW 1 261.0 1044 941 3.61 .05 2 248.2 992 912 3.68 .05 3 238.2 952 893 3.75 .06 4 230.8 923 878 3.80 .06 5 225.1 900 866 3.85 .06 6 220.9 883 858 3.88 .06 7 217.7 870 852 3.91 .07 8 215.4 861 849 3.94 .07 9 213.9 855 846 3.96 .07 10 212.8 851 845 3.97 .07 11 212.1 848 844 3.98 .07 12 211.6 846 843 3.99 .07 13 211.2 844 843 3.99 .07 14 211.0 843 842 3.99 .07 15 210.8 843 842 4.00 .07 16 210.7 842 842 4.00 .07 PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE \_vj'T-- DESIGN HYD: .20 .07 .07 4.00 842 TEST HYD 1: .10 .01 TEST HYD 2: .13 .02 .01 .02 2.61 3.31 540 690S, SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STOP ENLARGEMENT OPTION: ALLOWS FOR INCREASING STORAGE AT A SPECIFIED STAGE HEIGHT, TO PROVIDE A FACTOR OF SAFETY. ENTER: STORAGE -INCREASE(%), STAGE-HEIGHT(ft) PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW DESIGN HYD: .20 ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE 3.55 STORAGE a �' 973 .07 .04 ff r TEST HYD 1: .10 .01 .01 2.11 570 TEST HYD 2: .13 .02 .02 3.04 830 G- SPECIFY: D - DOCUMENT, R - REVISE, A - ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE, S - STO PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET -OUTFLOW ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE DESIGN HYD: .20 .07 .04 3.55 973 TEST HYD 1: .10 .01 TEST HYD 2: .01 2.11 570 "` .13 .02 .02 3.04 830 STRUCTURE DATA: R/D-VAULT RISER -HEAD VAULT -BOTTOM -AREA STOR-DEPTH STORAGE -VOLUME "IF FT 273.9 SQ-FT 4.00 FT 1095 CU-FT , /M , V '-A V L TRIPLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA(INCHES) HT(FEET) Q-MAX(CFS) BOTTOM ORIFICE: .51 .00 .014 s MIDDLE ORIFICE: .56 2.60 .010 TOP ORIFICE: 1.45 3.35 .046 1 ROUTING DATA: �4,f C _ STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS) STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT) .00 .00 .0 .0 l .40 .00 109.6 .0 .80 .01 219.2 .0 1.20 .01 328.7 .0 1.60 .01 438.3 .0 2.00 .01 547.9 .0 2.40 .01 657.5 .0 2.60 .01 712.2 .0 2.80 .02 767.0 .0 Page 2 3.20 .02 3.35 .02 3.60 .05 4.00 .07 4.10 .38 4.20 .95 4.30 1.68 4.40 2.48 4.50 2.76 AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEW]OB, detention.txt 876.6 .0 917.7 .0 986.2 .0 1095.8 .0 1123.2 .0 1150.5 .0 1177.9 .0 1205.3 .0 1232.7 .0 .0 MINUTES/INCH P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS surface water Management Division HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS version 4.21E 1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM 2 - SBUHYD 3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD 4 - ROUTE 5 - ROUTE2 6 - ADDHYD 7 - BASEFLOW 8 - PLOTHYD 9 - DATA 10 - RDFAC 11 - RETURN TO DOS ENTER OPTION: Stop - Program terminated. Page 3 !n c . 189" May 28, 2003 • • CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSO MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Shawn Lynch, PE CG Engineering 250 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Installation of Double Detector Check Valve Assembly (DDCVA) Copperstone Building at 128 Fourth Avenue South / ED-183 Dear Shawn: We have reviewed your request, dated May 14, 2003, to relocate the DDCVA from the approved location to the riser room. Before we can make our final decision on this matter, please provide a detailed drawing of the riser room showing the location of the equipment/piping and the location of the exterior door. Also, the remote reader will have to be mounted on the exterior wall so the Public Works Department can read the remote without accessing the riser room. City staff made note of the requirement and location of the DDCVA at your pre -application meeting in order to prevent problems/conflicts at a later date. However, this must have been overlooked, because the building was not designed to ensure the assembly could be installed at the property line. If we approve your request at this time, it is a one time approval. Since the requirement for DDCVA's is known well in advance of building design, there should be no problem installing the vault in the correct location, even if that means adjusting the building design to accommodate the vault's location. Sincerely, 4141 LYLE CHRISMAN Engineering Program Manager c: Lara Palmatier, Senior Permit Coordinator M:\dvrw\bldg\copperstone-ddcva.doc Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Cic+nr i'i+n _ T--fnLinan .Taman MAY-14-2003 WED 11:56 AM GINEERING 4M ENGINEERING facsimile transmittal FAX NO, IW78 5536 P. 01/04 CG Engineering PLLC 250 4`h Avenue South, Ste. 200 Edmonds, WA 99020 Telephone: 4251778-8500 : Facsimile: 425 / 778-5536 To: Lyle Cluisman Fax: (425) 672-5750 Of: City of Edmond% To: Steve Butterfield Fax: (425) 776-5746 _, Of: Butterfield Design Group To: Fax: Of; From: I ShaNvnLynch Date: 5-14-03 Re: Copperstone DDCVA Pages: 4 0 As Requestod 0 For RwAuw O Plows Continent Q Pkiwo Reply Q Urgont Lyle, Pk-" revie v tln: following letter about the DDLVA and call me to discu�� Sliawn MAY-14-2003 WED 11:58 AM C*GINEERING FAX N0, IW78 5536 P. 02/04 CNGINEERING May 14, 2003 City of Edmonds 121 56' A.venue Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Copperstone 6 Unit Condos P14n Check # 02-273, Plan Review # 1060-202 near Mr. C:hrisman: This letter is to request a deviation from your standards, for the double detector check, v"Oe assembly (DDCVA) to be located on the property line, for the above referenced project. The deviation that we are requesting is to place the DDCVA in the riser room located approximately 10 feet off the property line. As you can see in the attached plans that a minimum vault size of 6 foot by 5 foot would barely fit between the footings and would interfere with the stairs leading down to the floor level from the street. In addition, looking at the section that we have drawn, the minimum depth of the vault would interfere with the zone of influence of the footings on three siides of the vault and would require additional bends in the fire line to make the location work. By allowing us to locate the DDCVA in the riser room, efficiency of the system would increase due to the reduction of 90 degree bends to make the vault work. Yearly inspections will be safer due to the DDCVA being located above grade in a heated room. The inspector would have access through an exterior door located either outside in the covered walkway space or in the hallway, depending on the location of the DDCVA in the roorn. This would eliminate the requirement for the inspector to enter a confined space in order to inspect and test the DDCVA. To al leviate your concern of someone tapping into the system after construction, the line will be located under a concrete walkway from the property line to the riser room, and will have the second floor of the building located above it. iFyou have any questions or need iiirther clarification please call meat (425) 778- 8500. Sincerely, C:G Engineering 2504th Ave. South �- suits20o Sh�►wn fV�. )✓yii'ch, PE Edmmds,WA98020 Senior Civil engineer Phone: 425. t78.8500 l Fax: 425.778 506 MAY-14-2003 WED 11:56 AM CigGINEERING FAX NO, 4JO78 5536 P. 03/04 )Fz--orE ,tvXV>gr-,- ENGINEERING 250 41h Ave. South IPn,;uct &:-�, ,f f Edmonds, WA 9901-0 r �C3�.�js3laR� �• By (:hccked 1)utb Sculc/,y' r/. Shcct No. Job No / MAY-14-2003 WED 11:57 AM CG[N@EKING FAX N0, 4J678 5536 P. 04/04 7. ►fig t� �7" b 47-Aec Tp r =r v U��scriplion py uulc: .. ENGINEERING . " •- Scalu a � Shut No. 2504th Avo, South Job NNo. r -- Pix��tit Stlite2U0 Fdmoncl9, WA98020 0 0 l • 0 THIRD AVENUE NORTH RB, GUTTER /ILL BE -IE CITY WE AND -WA :57.09 EL=57 3TING - EX EET TREEEx A BE REMOVED R r.7 9r, A- - - - -WA- - - - - 4 3rd AVE N W77NNED USE NIDOMINIUM DING ON-STF E / 'I-.w / 0 , City of Edmonds Permit RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: `l'� A. Address or Vicinity .of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific) t �J%A �- C. Contractor: Rr����� �+ta.� �� Contact: Mailing Address: 9" o F f C1102 �'� "11 � `� Phone: t•/ a - ..��' State License#: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Pject EUC UD�ERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ . Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ VES NO G. . SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES. ,13, NO INDEMNITY.• Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless. from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, "that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, ,including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. r .THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must. have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior, to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of 'construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSAND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT A VAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: Date: FOR CITY USE ONLY Ri ht-of-wa t � ` Approved by: � ' �1 �') ' g y Fee: d Time Authorized: Void After / 1 04 Disruption Fee/Fund 111: tI # Special Conditions: y 6 Restoration Fee: C Total Fee: 1. ' 11715 s hf ` Receipt No: ' +'ssued by:i UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326) FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: DATE: Inspector's Signature For uirements see ion Information handout. NO WORK SHALL 13EGIN PIZIOIZ TO PEIZMIT ISSUANCE • SNOHOMISH COUNTY DID[OMD PERNOT HIEQUOSUTUGH PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO 1 Work Order # 332305 Task # 02 & 04 Requested by: HOON HA Phone 425-783-5019 Date 10/15/03 Jurisdiction issuing permit: (specify) CITY OF EDMONDS CITY COUNTY STATE AGENCY OTHER Type of Permit Requested: Underground j1 Overhead] Description of Project/Activity: Provide service to the Copperstone Building from an existing transformer and new secondary vault in the alley. The existing primary overhead line will be removed and relocated underground. R.O.W. Frontage (linear feet) 265 Customer: HAMMERWORKS Property Address: 128 4TH AV S, EDMONDS 98020 Section 23 Township 27 Range 03 CONSTRUCTION: ESTIMATED START DATE: 11/3/03 DURATION: 4 DAYS ESTIMATED COST: $20,000 Additional information for incorporation in transmittal or permit application FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY PERMIT REQUESTED: PERMIT NEEDED BY: PERMIT RECEIVED: REQUESTOR NOTIFIED: 0 LAYOUT LEGEND: ® PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER ® SUBMERSIBLE TRANSFORMER ❑J ABOVE GROUND J-BOX © SUBMERSIBLE J-BOX O SECONDARY VAULT PULLING VAULT Q SWITCH CABINET © SECONDARY PEDESTAL PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CABLE #350 SECONDARY UNDERGROUND CABLE 4/0 SECONDARY UNDERGROUND CABLE 1/0 SECONDARY UNDERGROUND CABLE STREET LIGHT CABLE o POLE AND OVERHEAD LINE PROPERTY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE U EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE �.� EXISTING DUCT FUTURE DUCT S —O SANITARY SEWER/MANHOLE D—OSTORM DRAIN/CATCH BASIN W—nWATER MAIN/METER Y FIRE HYDRANT i� STREET LIGHT * UNDERGROUND LOCATOR MARKER SCHEMATIC LEGEND: • 10 TRANSFORMER 3 0 TRANSFORMER 0 SUBMERSIBLE TRANSFORMER 0 200 AMP J-BOX ■ 600 AMP J-BOX ��— FUSE PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CABLE OVHD EXISTING OVERHEAD --{ i— DISCONNECT SWITCH, NORMALLY OPEN --1-1-- DISCONNECT SWITCH,NORMALLY CLOSED STANDOFF BRACKET FEEDER LINE E3 PULL THRU BOX FEED THRU BUSHING ON TRANSFORMER FAULT INDICATOR ADDITIONAL UGND TAPPED AT T/O POLE OVERHEAD TO BE REMOVED ON WOR1332305-02 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: AT NORTH POLE, INSTALL 10 TERMINAL POLE (12U111). FUSE UNDERGROUND CABLE WITH SOLID BLADES AND INSTALL FAULT INDICATOR (PER CONSTR. STD. 4-24-30.0). AT A-1 INSTALL JUNCTION BOX. TERMINATE AND TAG CABLES PER SCRHEMATIC. AT A-2,TERMINATE PUD AND CUSTOMER SECONDARY WIRES ON (4)4-POS TERMINAL BLOCKS. AT A-13043, TERMINATE PUD SECONDARY WIRES ON EXISTING (4)6-HOLE XFMR SPADES. AT SOUTH POLE, INSTALL 10 TERMINAL POLE (12U111) WITH 4" RISER (FUSE UNDERGROUND CABLE WITH SOLID BLADES AND INSTALL FAULT INDICATOR (PER CONSTR. STD. 4-24-30.0). 1 0 * 0 - .-"- V AUL T S CABLE ALL FOOTAGES APPROXIMATE "ax unnr'xs�� b � BY CUSTOMER BY PUD OR PUD'S CONTRACTOR LOCATION 12B 4TH AV S EDMONDS 98020 AREA S. COUNTY POLE NO SE1AS23 T27 R03 DATE 10/14/03 WO NO 332305 A— 1 FROM POLE TO A-1 REASON FOR WORK PROVIDE 10 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ENGINEER HA TASK 04 4'8" x 4'8" x 3'6" CONCRETE VAULT AND 65' OF (1) *2 AL CNCTRC NEUT DB JCKTD PRI 1N 2" PVC & CONVERT OH PRIMARY FOR DRAFTER UGND NO 5373 4'8" x 4'8" x 6" COVER W/A 3' x 3' DIAMOND MAKE PO REEL COPPERSTONE SM. APPRovEo SCALE NOTED PLATE LID a — A— Z FROM A-1TO POLE 02 NEUT JCKTD PRI IN 2" PVC DATE WORK COMPLETED DATE FOREMAN ENVIRONMENTAL. ANALYSIS 325' OF (1) AL CNCTRC DB suesrnnoN MAPLEWOOD � FEES REQ D • YES 0 NO ■ ExEMPr ❑NOT EXEMPT PARA 18 ITEM C 4'0" x 4'0" x 3'6" CONCRETE VAULT AND MAKE PO REEL CIRCUIT NO 12-343 PHASE 3 4'0" x 4'0" z 6" COVER w/A 3' x 3' DIAMOND PRIMARY OVERHEAD ovRD corRouctoR Kv PLATE LID SECONDARIES AT A-2 ROAD CROSSINGS ONLY ORESIOENTIAL ADD CKT FT _PH 45' OF (1) RUN OF 350 KCM QUAD WITH 350 NEUTRAL BY TO (4) 4-POS TERM BLOCKS I APPV DATE DESCRIPTION ❑COMMERCIAL REM CKT FT _PH (T1502) BY PUD LEO- NEi CKT FT (2)RUNS OF 500 KCM WITH 350 NEUTRAL BY CUSTOMER (COPPERSTONE BLDG) REVISIONS 0s s ucND CONDUCTOR 7.2 KV' PRIMARY UNDERGROUND ADD 26S CKT FT �_PH APPV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION ❑ RESIDENTIAL REM Q CKT FT PH O COMMERCIAL BASIC FEE f _ NET 265 CKT FT LEU- PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) DUCT a f------ f 0 TREE TRIM BY PUD SECONDARY UNDERGROUND STATECOUNTY BASIC FEES 0 AO 5' OF (1) 4" PVC BY PUD 0 f _/'- i ■CITY EDYONDS UNDERGROUND PLAT EASEMENTS ■ REDUIRED BY CUSTOMER BASIC FEE i ENGINEERING E. O NOT REOUIRED BO 20V OF (1) 2" PVC W/0) 90• & (1) 45• STEEL BENDS C. FT 0 f— . $ PLAT COTRUCTION NS REQUEST NO. 7W2 © 265' OF (1) 4" PVC W/0) 90• STEEL BEND (FUTURE) t FT 0 f . f DATE APPROVED DO 20' OF (1) 4" PVC W/90" BEND STREET LIGHTING FOREIGN CONTACTS t FT 0 f . 7 O VERIZON JPN. CROSSINGS ❑ CATV JPN. _t FT 0 f . f ■ JOINT TRENCH VERIZON t CATV WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY O JOINT BORE VERIZON f CATV AS -BUILT O PRIMARY 0 ❑ SEC ONDARY POLE STENCILING APPV NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FT 0 f_ . f FROM TO MISCELLANEOUS FEES TAKE OFF POLE VAULT f PRE-CONSTR REQUIREMENTS 4-501i PERMIT f 225.00 0 TREE TRIM ❑ PUD LOCATOR COST ESTIMATE f ❑ BACKHOE ❑ F-O 4-13 f IS ONE CALL DATE 0 25-11219 TOTAL DUET READY PHASING SL-37529-D DATE PAID G1S WORKING RECEIPT- DMS FINISHED 11/14 MEW SVCE APPLICATION. 11 LINE I JOINT USE 3 ENGINEER HOON HA CUSTOMER HAMMERWORKS LOCATION MAP PACE 454.F6 A— ^ 1 PHONE 425-783-5019 PRONE 425-335-7754 XING PRINTED 4-14 i;��AR 425-347-9722/879-4547 PAGER/ 425-750-BOOT PRINTED A-13043 FU SOLID EXISTING O �:F25-1111-5 D ECOPPERSTONE BUIlDOG T I al 1/14 I 3 I 0 15-8996 IX 25-1867 4-15 D SL-23577-D / A=1 4-16 // 1-4 WAY MPL +� DAYTON ST. 12 343 LAYOUT Y' • 50' IVY A=1 1-4 WAY FU40A SCHEMATIC NITS CABLE *'S CABLE #'S VICINITY MAP TAGS VAULT: CABLE: a n X H • o p PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY LOCATION 128 4TH AV S., EDMONDS 98020 HALLS LAKE AREA POLE NO. SE 1/4S 23 T 27 R 03 DATE 3/21/03 W.O. No. 332305 REASON FOR WORK RMV 10 OH PRIMARY ENGINEER HA TASK 02 FOR COPPERSTONE BLDG DRAFTER HA S.R. No. 00016231 SCALE 1'' = 5 0' DATE WORK COMPLETED APPROVED DATE PRINTED FOREMAN FEES REQ'D ■YES ❑NO PRIMARY OVERHEAD ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL LEO NO. @$ '-8 SECONDARY OVERHEAD BASIC FEE 8 METER/CONY. POLE 8 PRIMARY UNDERGROUND ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL BASIC FEE S LEU NO. SECONDARY UNDERGROUND BASIC FEE $_ @$ '=$ UNDERGROUND PLAT BASIC FEE 8 FT.@$ 1=$ STREET LIGHTING (� FTA$ _$ WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY ❑ PRIMARY ❑ SECONDARY rt FT.@$ _$ MISCELLANEOUS FEES VAULT S PERMIT 8 COST ESTIMATE s s_ 8 TOTAL DUE 8 DATE PAID RECEPT NO. i FrFKin: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ■ EXEMPT ❑ NOT EXEMPT PARA. 18 ITEM C O.H. U.G. COND. 7.2 KV ADD CKT. FT. PH REM 245 CKT. FT. 1 PH NET <245> CKT. FT. O.H. U.G. COND. KV ADD CKT. FT. PH REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ STATE ❑ COUNTY ■ EDMONDS ❑ REQUEST # EASEMENTS ❑ REQUIRED ■ NOT REQUIRED DATE RELEASED FOREIGN CONTRACTS ■ VERIZON JPN NO. ■ CATV JPN NO. ❑ JOINT TRENCH VERIZON & CATV ❑ JOINT BORE VERIZON & CATV POLE STENCILING FROM TO TAKE OFF POLE PRE-CONST. REQUIRMENTS ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ PUD LOCATOR ❑ BACKHOE ■ FLAGGING ■ ONE CALL DATE No. READY PHASING GIs WORKING POLE/ XFMR DMS FINISHED 1 LINE JOINT USE LOCATION MAP PAGE 454,F6 C) EXISTING POLE X EXISTING POLE -TO BE REMOVED • NEW POLE )K NEW POLE TO REPLACE EXISTING POLE SUBSTATION MAPLEWOOD CIRCUIT NO. 12-343 PHASE 3 ENGR'S TEL. # 425-783-5019 ENGR'S PAGER # 425-347-9722 4-12 3 4-13 425 4-14 25 15 T 40 1 3 (Before) 4-.12 3 4-13 425 C� 25 15 1 3 (After) SCHEMATIC NTS CONTACT Kevin Lennson C:206/790-7228 W:425/775-0564 OCOMP#4-14 RMV EXIST SEC SVC FROM POLE TO CONSTR TEMP MTR STRIP, TOP & ABANDON 45'P TO TELE & CATV ©COMP#4-13 INSTL3/8" SG TO EXIST GUY STUB POLE RMV 10 VERT DDE (12V109) TO SOUTH RMV #2 ACSR PRIM & NEUT RE -SAG SEC SVC FROM OB TO CONSTR TEMP MTR ©COMP#4-15 RMV 10 VERT DDE (12V109) TO NORTH RMV #2 ACSR PRIM & NEUT RMV EXIST DG & ANC TO SOUTH NOTE: 10 underground on PPrimary installed on WO #332305-04 B A -GOf11 O; 4-16 �' U DAYTON ST. 12 343 (n • • ALLEY CLOSURE WITH DETOUR R11-4 TD + I t PARKING LOT THRU TRAFFIC ALTERNATE ACCESS D z � R11-4 To THRU TAAFFIC � ALTEANATE > ACCESS --t ON WIN ST O (n LEGEND: • CHANNELIZING DEVICE r FLAGGING STATION PORTABLE SIGN AND SUPPORT WORK VEHICLE WITH FLASHING LIGHT OR PROTECTION VEHICLE WITH ®WORK TRUCK -MOUNTED ATTENUATOR (TMA) ® WORK AREA ® WARNING SIGN HIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICE ALLEY 4TH AV S ROAD R11-2 CLOSED PARKIN Gi LOT R1172 a�D r R � ' ALLEY Fq 4TH AV S ROAD R11-2 aosEo _' +It Z ROAD R11-2 aosED To R11-4 THRU TRAFFIC ALTERNATE ACCESS PH DAYTON ST ALLEY CLOSURE D Vl --I rD R11-4 THRU TRAFFIC ALTERNATE ACCESS ON YTl9! ST I I F Otto Rosenau & Associates, Inc. Job #: Project: Address: Client: Date: _r3 Is I Soil ,Desc-;pl,on 1101�l _518 c V , - ( _-, Locatinn 21 1v 'A, a 31 (, L , �'- IN-PLACE DENSITY REPORT OF SOILS (ASTM D 2922) Report #:� Permit #: Architect: Enqineer: Contractor: ,Inspector: _161AYI*_'_' I IR Lab Maximum Dry Densities Equipment Uncorrected Corrected ID (7- Dry Density Optimum Moisture Oversize % rock Dry Density Optimum Moisture ASTM Method Wet -7 Ll ,? :?-3 X1 H2O X1 1. Compaction Methods & Equip: PBrcenllGomiiiao6AWWWZ Test Method Depth of F;" soil ID Wet Jroensit., Moisture % D3017 Dry Den 1tv Max. Dry Densit % comp, Conforms < Ili S Z L/ 41. :3 l 30.3 1/4_15 rK 7 xN. ments t Tested b�__L>. Reviewed by This report applies only to the items tested and is the exclusive prope�f the client a'46fto Rosenau & Associates, Inc. Reproduction of this report, except in full, without written permission from our firm is strictly prohibited. Form No.: F- 112 Page 1 of 1 Revised: 10/02 6747 ML King Way S., Seattle, Washington 98118 - Phone (206) 725-4600 - Fax (206) 723-2221 City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit No:�d�� Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction:' e B. Type of. Work (be specific): <,hJ),,ac:",,J C. Contractor: An'`t � =iCt" u, Contact:me Mailing Address: vo 0 NY, 6I~-V— 45 Phone: lalf<e State License #:r�� Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) Multi-Family '� ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT 0 X �� CONCRETE CUT: . El YES ❑' NO � n p' a �?., y ? �j t G ea;) Y INDEMNITY. • Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he�she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes.. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with.the permit application.. C L DIAL-k-,DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE BGiVE ,9TA�ENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 MUST MAKT :I} CO Y OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: �' d C _ _ _ Date: _ FOR CITY USE ONLY,� Approved by: i= ' Right-of-way Fee: Time Authorized: Void After / > Disruption Fee/Fund Special Conditions: Restoratio Fee: Total Fee: Receipt No: ��- i r T-� Issued by: ,. a sue... �- , UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326) FINAL APPROVAL OFPERMITTED WORK: DATE: Inspector's Signature For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout. NO WORK SMALL 131;;CIN I'RIOR TO I'ElMIT ISSUANCE I RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5`h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 CONFORMED COPY 200305080071 6 PGS 05-08-2003 09:47am $24.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON COVENANT Reference #: BD'I — Z:: � �y/ Grantor(s): (1) Collperstone LLC (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 43 Twn g?,V Rng ge Qtr_ OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 2327-034-047-00 (2)2327-o34-o4A-oo Assessor's Tax parcel ID# not yet assigned "CI"TALS Whereas, the Grantor(s) Copperstone LLC hereafter referred to as "Grantor(s)", have received a Building Permit # XW9 -7"1 for Property which is zoned BC, and is located at 128 Fourth Avenue South, in Edmonds, Washington, tax account parcel number(s) 002327-034-047-00 and 002327-034-048-00, and legally described as. follows: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH STRi;E r AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS 8Y DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1782213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OP 40 FEET, MOR OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF IgEGINNING. AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING 1dinonds. By: �I�ate:�b page --f— of 7 STREET'FILE I Whereas, the grantor(s) desire to provide exterior exit balconies within exit courts on the second and third floor of the north, south, and east sides of the subject building which are also used as decks as shown in Attachments A and B. Whereas, the City has received a building permit application for a new mixed - use, building to be located in a commercial business zone at 128 Fourth Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington. Whereas, the City of Edmonds Building Official must verify through plan review and building inspection that compliance with the 1997 Uniform Codes, Washington State Amendments, and Local codes are met. Whereas, the City of Edmonds Building Official desires to notice current and future owners of the building (collectively "the Owners") of the designated use of the exterior exit balconies as required emergency egress from sleeping rooms and the requirements to have and maintain such use. NOW, THPPZEFOR$, in consideration of the City of Edmonds, Washington approving the building permit the Grantors agree as follows: TIER.MS Section 1. Binding Effect. This Covenant and all terms hereof shall be bidding on Grantor(s), their heirs, assigns and successors in interest, and shall be deemed to run with the land and bind all future Owners of the real property described above. Section_ 2. ecorditm. Within 30 days after execution of this Covenant by the Parties, the City shall record. this Covenant with the Snohomish County Auditor. Grantor(s) shall pay all recording fees. Section 3. Covenants: Exterior Exit Balconies. Grantors hereby covenant that the exterior exit balconies located on the north, south, and east sides of the building on the second and third floors as described herein and shown on Attachments A and B: a) Will remain completely clear and unobstructed at all times for required emergency escape to the public alley from the sleeping rooms that open onto the exterior exit balconies. b) Will not be altered in any way including any portion of the gates, latches, dividers, guardrails, signage, etc. without first obtaining approval from the Building Official of the City of Edmonds: C) Will not have locking devices or latches of any kind installed on the exit gates, except at the full -height door opening into the alley where panic hardware will be provided with a keyed lock on the alley side. A key will be provided in a lock -box for Fire Department access. d) Will maintain gates in good working order. AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING Ci o Edmonds By:Date• 2 3 Page of _j(p_ �ppZ Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary T'ublic in and for the State of Washington. Residing atl�zla,� AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING i y f Edmonds $y:. . Mite: 2 (o Page .1 of (ram SECOND FLOOR PLAN ;COPPERSTONE BUILDING, '12$ 4TH AVENUE SOUTH ,]DMONDSI WA 98020 AUTHOWZEID FOR RECORDING ci o Edmonds By: I '. Elate: page of ATTACHMENT A T-HIRP FLOOR. PLAN COPPERSTONE BUILDING 128 4TI AVENUE SOUTH EDMONDS9 WA.98020 AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING Ci Edmonds By: --7w Date: 2, .Page 5 of ATTACHMENT B DOOR PtL1. K4ERE APPLICABLE LINE OF WILDINS— 3'-O° E61RESS &ATE r-METAL FLISH r5I&A REMAIN UNOBSTRUCTED -F1REER�f---- ;bl NOTES I. GATE TO HAVE VNLOCICABLE Pik%A6E HARDWARE. Z. SATE TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. S. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO MANUFACTURING. WALEi 5/4' = 1'-0' EGRESS GATE DETA I L AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING Ci Edmonds By: Date: Page of 67 COP'P°ERSTONE BUILDING ATTACHMENT C 12,8 4TH AVENUE SOUTH EDMONDS., OVA "020 ` - s City of Edmonds Permit No:A� RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: ®® "O r> A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific):C~ �YYV I 1 1 �:}� 7, 1 1 �' ' ' X 1 `. � t ti to! 4 11 1 _I Avt N 411\I C. Contractor: 1u I` Contact: Mailing Address: J j )C A �f \i . Phone: t E - �� 1 - `Y State License #: T2� 10 1(. I i l I A- Liability Insurance: Bond: $ City Business License #: D. Building Permit # (if applicable E. ❑ Commercial 14 Multi -Family INSPECTOR: F. � PAVEMENT CUT: CONCRETE CUT: ❑ Subdivision ❑ Single Family Py YES ❑ NO YES ❑ NO Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): ❑ City Project ❑ .EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, COMCAST, OVWSD) ❑ Other G. SIZE OF CUT X ,r G. ❑ Mail Approved Permit ❑ Call for Pickup :; r `1 t APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY. • Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLE'PGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK C PY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR NSPECTIONS '\ C �c, Signature: � ` ��� Date: (Contractor or Agent) CITY USE ONLY Approved by: Right-of-way Fee: $IA f oi-4 --ro Time Authorize : Void After. Agri i 1,23Ili"l .2(� (`%d Disruption Fee/Fund 11142W Special Conditions:PANrAity SI/utnt. SETtiA(ic Fkt4w Ali- Inspection Fee:,Zg A60°'�v_ ? 0Tr riF t i)unn►n s LITIcfrrFS, F m42e= kcW Total Fee: Jt i7 , iZ hNi i =4 BE r) K t'nl.r ry rI orris . Acr_ 9Zr A FFFCrita Receipt No a_ 13I r)F NrC. A lv ti (`'� Iu (Itns � r ; r^.N'&1 r, _ftk ! C 4: saFE Issued by: ~' l z �Z)Fc.Tt2tAwi T RAFF7e ; &CA= All I ' tl7'tt_/T1F5r—JA1riRk1Nf, )opus• AkE i>f�/7ta7G(ty1 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: ANn POK 'F! MAL- '-J. Call 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 for a 24-hour voice- rec ed inspection request line. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: DATE: I'6 nspector's Signature C:\Documents and SettingsTurtis\My Documents\Fomu\Engnrng\ROWpermit_ doc Revised 10/01/03 ;� E RECEIVEA . Liw (J� AM-);PERMIT /� EXPIRES l/ ` CITY OF DMONDS zONE PERMIT /% 4� - "" ' NUMBER / CONSTRUCTION PERMITAPPLICATION / JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS % /)�f✓ 7 , �/ V / rvS!!//1 OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. P-59410 13(J1 LID FEE $ Cr MAILING ADDRESS w C z1b .T WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP 1 RW Pe Approved Permit Required Street Use PermitReq'd CITY ZIP TELEPHONE EXISTING PROP SED / Inspection Required Sidewalk Required �+��Q�•� Pjq(,. 1-,5% os.(.� ^1'�J REpUIREDDEDICATION FT raund W�ngrequirred NAME �AETF7�7SIZE�e� iwM6�t • LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED ❑ YES NO Q cc ADDRESS EMARKS z z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE ��� 2..rt" `'�:a C,./1r11 i , .1i h Lu CITY ZIP TELEPHONE ,iFiV 3r� �tild tllc��S FAr let Dr+Q� 9'aa�.e +7-�"'.-775.oS&�$- NAME a a y/{ / �jn10 ���l E ADDRESS—....• U . r FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE w CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Z j`:! �r VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# Ar>13—(/I`/ "/ -3I INSPECTION RED SQ'ONO BOND POSTE STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY ' SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLLLLO,WWEED PROP/O)SE a PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. J 9.p 2S2 l „ OZ4— 0+ —00 EXP/I � /lam'' �v NEW I RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ��, X LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.) FRONT SIDE REAR„ PROPOSED'SETBACKS(FT.) .,FRONT URSI E REAR ❑AUDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ G �; I / �- --�^ rS,Q, �� S!(/r�� t7 2 CHANGE OF USE ❑REMODEL APARTMENT ❑ ❑ SIGN z g PARKING REO'D PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED B DATE g FENCE 7 v��i'" GRADING ❑ REPAIR ❑ CYDS ❑ ( X FT) R MA S ie_,A, 4 OTHER ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ 1, z GARAGE r RETAINING CARPORT ❑ WALL ❑ RENEWAL (TYPE OF US�, BU INESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: CHECKEDBY TYPE O CONSTRUCTION COp OCCUPANT i IPe-�T i .. GROUP OF NUMBER OF DWELLING CRITICAL AREAS CNUMBER SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPA T ' OSTORIES UNITS NUMBER REQUIRED XYES LOAD-` ' �v DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS t7 - PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D o OaI G� J r f VALUATION ` FEE ry ]F i CCCJJJ PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE G ZING % LOT SLOPE % -77 '76 I ',.�A BUILDING PLAN CHEC VESTED DATE PLUMBING "601iA1GICAL THIS PERMIT�AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t: BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC f DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE OfiADING(EILL�� SEPARATE PERMISSION. i STATE SURCHARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION. 180 DAYS - a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR -,.PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FE SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION y 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE I U) IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING -- EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,` ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE 9 ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPT = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT " A 0 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANYREOUIREMENTOFANYCITYORDINANCE i NOR LIMIT INANYWAYTHECITY'SABILITY TOENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' RECEIPT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ TF(IS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY W H CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUT RIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF LA OR C D OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space pr vide . WORKMEN'S CO ATI N INS RA CE AND RCW 18.27. OFFICIAL IG�IAT Ar SIGNATURE_�O N DATE SIGNED 425v.! r . l '•_..__ �- - - 771-0220 RTLE-9 ATE ATTENTION EXT1333 C� q05 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING, OR STRUCTURE UNTIL %%1 '0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK -OWNER • GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 „PATE RECEIVED L PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE gPERMIT e 5 07, q 7— CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB � / �,� SUITE/APT# ADDRESS Q� U OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ %,/ A / (J MAILING ADDRESS DIN � S PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION FT TESCP Approved Permit Required Street Use Permit RegV Inspection Requited Sidewalk Required Underground wiring required CITY ZIP A TELEPHONE NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 NO 13 Q= ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE = O W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME CBL# ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE ADDRESS � O FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE '"yL Cam_ a � �r —O ul Is CITY ZIP C/ TELEEPPHH'ONE%t �C�'✓ �! ✓ VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# 113YES INSPECTION REO'D ONO BOND POSTED $ , i T� STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CH KED BY SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE I EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED I PROPOSED 4 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE CHANGE OF USESE LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR PARKING REQ'D PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN �] ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ (ENE X FT) REMARKS ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK � _ O O ❑ CARRAGE PORT ❑ ROCAINING KERY WALL FIRE ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OJI ACTIVITY) EXPLAI -5 �/ r„'1.� i� CU J (r CHECKED BY TY OF CONSTRUCTION �,n CO OCCUPANT GROUP 1 S -31 NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING Q UNITS u CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ YES AREA OCCUPAN LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D = 9 1 VALUATION Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit 11) — City Surcharge PLAN CHECK�IQ;�(( VESTED DATE Plumbing Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 7 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. � PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS Grading Engr. Review d PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr. Inspection 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review e Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF Q EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY _ Fire Inspection Receipt # FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE 9 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE -� Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due i NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Recording Fee Receipt # 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I VE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT 1 THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY ITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND 1 ING EJORK HORIZED THEREBY NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATI TH LAR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TOFOR WORKMEN' PE TIINS CE AND RCW 18.27. CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building cial or his/her Deputy: and Fees ere paid, and INSPECTIONrec tisecl�ripwledgedinspacep o ed. SIGNATUR V�j AG NT) DATE SIGNED OF S ATURE :. D E (425) ' 771 -0220 L D Y DATE ATTE N off 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC.SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER • GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN -ACCOUNTING %V�ca 1 da-� pe-s*� K. oh -fire- h jdor44 l- psW co,-n"of D Nfli Av S. 2/evzho-n = G 7.35, FRONT -�-' SIDE REAR -�-' OTHER aHT��� sh ah/� AVERAGE DATUM HE 16HT5 PROPERTY CORNER A: 51.15' PROPERTY CORNER B: 62.16' PROPERTY CORNER C: 61.155' PROPERTY CORNER 0: 60.16' TOTAL: 242.04' AVERAGE DATUM: 60.51' (TOTAL / 4) MAX. ALLOW. HT.: g0.51' (DATUM + 50.09 PROJECT: 0 z z a STREET FILE RECEIVED NOV 14 2002 PERMIT COUNTER DATE:10-1"2 BUTTERFIELD PARTNERSHIP INC COF FER5TONE RE' 210 5TH AVE. - #203 EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLAN CHECK : 425-775-0564 FAX 425-776-0746 B U I L. D I N G 02-215 EMAIL: ButterfleldDesign@ATTBI.COM 126 - 4th AVENUE .SOUTH, EWON05, A& 418020 DATE RECEIVED1/64' 244 PERMIT EXPIRES D CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE PERMIT - NUMBER QC/ CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITVAPI# ADDRESS ��'1fyr1 OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS I PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. S MAILING ADDRESS ---- LID FEE S /) JD AO D G' /�'R� "w✓f/ wv PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STRE MAP T� � � nra As�YN EXISTING Su Use Strat uu Mnna ImpecdonRegWred CITY ZIP TELEPHONE PROPO D-I4 Sidewalk Required E" 0J /1 1 VIM L1 �`•�+ v�-f_ 1V REQUIRED DEDICATION FTUndaripmW NAME /� �M LINE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED i0 ID M I III I M YES NO a I�u C ADDRESS u� z c `''$ w 3 ..+Ii.7 OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE o �' a�\ CITY ZIP 0L9807o' TELEPHONE 7"rs c.�s�..�i NAME CB��� N • �� ®� �f M�� tJ L% •//vv//fin ENGIN ERING REVIEWED BY D ADDRESS �•+C�S ' �� I1 I % ��- s Zoo' _1111bork, FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE a. CITY ZIP TELEPHONE VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR AD BN INSPECTION D BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE VA el.. O 1 2•C�,. � � MAr `.'...�— 1ADo—ow OYEs o s U 1. ��'�� SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL. O...... „r„ COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR o ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL � COR ❑ F z CHANGEOOF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY'. ❑ SIGN Q'D PARKINGPROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE 6 ❑ REPAIR CYDSi ❑ ( �. X FT) REM oo G �1 ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER ...+ ❑ GARAGE WALL ❑ FIRE SALARM PRINKLER CARPORT❑ ROCKERYG FIRE (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: I N C HEQKEo BY NSTRU N CQj OCCUPANT tuf [7J GROUP f O NUMBER OF NUMBER OF DWELLING 8. CR CAL AREAS —., SPECIAL INSPECTION JAREA OCCUPANT OSTORIES UNITS NUMBEp i REQUIRED YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE •� REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECT1 NS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RECVD 9 ItJ � C � '� \ .�f'►T 1 W� VALUATION .. : ,.............. . r $� Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE G 0 9G LOT SLOPE % ... •r. 2, Z Building Permit City Surcharge P CHECK VESTED DATE Plumbing ` Mechanical �-- THIS PERYRAUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t M BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading � DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRNEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. 2 Engr. Review PERMR APPLICATION: 180 DAYS s PERMIT LIMM 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARED WITHIN 100 DAYS Engr. Inspection ..� SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fife Review \`'��, Plan Chk. Deposit .; rr 11 IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CrTY OF ' WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEEN, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt a IEDMONDS. ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE,'ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY 9 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL. NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt Due .� _ NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'8 ABILITY T6 ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION' Recording Fee Receipt III I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THA HA READ THIS APPUG(ILnON; THAT .THE INFORMATION GIVEN 18 RRECT AND THA AM, E OWNER, Oqq THE' DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF CrTY APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWN E AGRE TO LY WITH AND BTATTyLAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; LNG W AUTHORIZED TH� BY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VI ODg OF,tUt 8TATE)OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WO E 0 RANCEIAND REIN 18.27. FOR INSPECTION receipt Isacimoy4edgedInspace provided. `1 O C GNA DATE GJ; 81G n, DATE SIGNED� - p^� �(4� /�VG�) J e a •ZQ E/DDAATE R D BY ATT ION Off 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL.TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL �. A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 EL ELLLO-(N SP IK ORIGINAL -FILE •YW- NCTOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES PINK - OWNER GREEN -ACCOUNTING EOM x' PE CAP 241'N CL & 170' W CL (—_')N CL —� ( --- • )W CL � u I :U `�, .• I , r COR%W NI ft c� 4 t�GN Q _ ll W w 7,7 ao 69 d' /9S7 9i i 2. ' N 303 1 76w MillNR �►a+ DA YTON ST " I za ,c r w }—� team a> �W�" 30's - I " GAS a I �i � 19� di 7 I v I 2 Yel i aq 5 x 42)/41- N 19 7ra 3 I" _ I STANDARD GAS CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. FIELD LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. CALL 'ONE —CALL' TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, IN WESTERN WASHINGTON CALL- 1-800-424-5555. IN KITTITAS COUNTY CALL- 1-800-553-4344 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONFORM TO PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS AND GAS FIELD PROCEDURES. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARD PRACTICE 0150.3200 TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 4. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING D k.S PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. USE : iSi TO DISTRIBUTE FLYERS IF JOB IS LARGE. OTHERWISE HAND DELIVER FLYERS BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE UST OF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND INFORMATION ABOUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE AN EXCESS FLOW VALVE WHEN THEIR SERVICE IS INSTALLED OR REPLACED PER GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2550.1600, ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME FOR CUSTOMER DECISION AND RESPONSE 5. ANY CHANGE IN ROUTE, TIE—IN METHOD OIL ADDITIONAL MAIN FOOTAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY PSE GAS ENGINEERING SERVICES. 6. COMPLETE "PIPE CONDITION REPORT' ON ALL EXPOSED EXISTING PSE FACILITIES. CHECK BOX ON REPORT FOR WIRE BOX (TEST LEAD) INSTALLATION. 7. ACTIVE SERVICES DENOTED BY: XXX 8. PIPELINE MARKERS AND WARNING SIGNS SHALL, BE IN STALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2500. 9. VALVE MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDEDi, BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2600 FOR ALL HP VALVES IF THE LO(,ATION IS_. NOT. REDILY ACCESSIBLE, AND FOR ALL.;VALVES WHERE PERSISTANT SNOWFALL MAY OBSCURE THE :VALVE BOX 10. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL OVERPRESSURE QE ADJOINING SYSTEMS, NO TWO MAINS SHALE BE CONNECTED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN; UNLESS APPROVEQ B� PSE GAS - ENGINEERING SERVICES. 11. SYSTEM MAOP DENOTED BY: I SYSTEM MAOP' _ PSIG 12. RESTORE ALL DRIVEWAYS SUBJECT TO OPEN GAIT TO �?$(GINI�L � BETTER CONDITION. 13. GAUGE AND MONITOR USE OF ALL STOPPEgS QUID SQ P FXZEP TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FEED. (USE MANOMETER FOR LP SYSTEMS) 14. PURGE POINTS AND PRESSURE TAPS TO BE INSTALLED fSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3400, AND 2525.100. 15. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH CORROSION CONTROL• ED VOOOT J06-396-2799-6313. � r 2" TRANS. PIT. & TEST LEAD 22 0M CL & 170' W CL Vidnity AP I T (r —' )N CL wfww crro : p- a T— — --- PROPOSED 220' 2" PE ' D MAIN 17C ' W , W CL aft TIE—IN 2" SERVICE TEE H-17501 21'N CL & 170'W CL (—_')N CL ( --- ')W CL FITTER (CHECK BOX IF COMPLETE) Work area left in Clean & Safe nditior, Complete ail Pipe Tables and Gas Pres:uic `tamp Field changes Red —Lined on as —built Material verified and Changes noted or. I)uhurw0i k All Valve & Tie—in Locations noted on as —built Note beginning of Main, EOM & Line cf Main locations Show Rope Locations & Cul—de—sac Rod us Foreman's Signature Company Employee IDJ. GAS MAIN WSTALLATIONIRETIREMENT Estimated ' Actual fiuWir 777 = Contractor: CONSTRUCTION COST CODES: 041-1033 W ,41 10,49A. on W own er a a' U`•' , elIa I v J. : aol► r pd1° N -E CD `' "ELL WY CA:t;.' • Owner/Developer Contact Info COPPER8TONE LLC PO BOX 1 LYNNWOOD, WA 98846 ATTN: MIKE ECHEL13ARGER 425-741.3535 office CALL CALL (800)42j-d Project Manager Contact Z BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG DIG DOUG USITALO CELL.• 425-327.3451 THIS SKETCH NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR EXACT LOCATION OF FAgLITIES REAL ESTATEIEASEMENT PERMIT NIA EDMONDS REV# DATE BY DESCRIPTION FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE DATE 3 PROJECT MGR D. USRALO 206-418-4236 1/22/04 2 ENGR-GAS 1 DRAWN BY P. MCGHUEY 206-418-4214 1IM" CHECKED BY D. USITALO 206-418-4236 -0 COUNTY EMER SECT GAS WK CTR APPROVED BY D. USITALO 206-418-4236 El KING 5 MCNSEG FITTER #1 11 1/4 SEC OP MAP PLAT MAP FITTER #2 SE-23-27-03 160.062 163.065 MAPPING JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS UTILITIES El CONTACT PHONE# SAP Superior Order. PUGET COPPER STONE LLC 1WO19218 so Drawing Number. ENERGY 2" PE IP MAIN EXTENSION WA 128 4 AV S, EDMONDS 98020 SCALE: ,OE: DESIGNED BY PILCHUCK CONTRACTORS INC. 1- m 50' 1 1f1 2 oo� -Z� 10 SEE R.O.S. / BK.18, P,283 6,59 SUBDIVISION LINE — 30.73 — — 143.44 — — I at W P, ,h0 PSP� 6' PVC CITY RECORDS SHOW Tf IE SANITARY SEWER TO BE IN THE ALLEY, SEWER RUNS 2" / 0 �L / EE R.O.S. /BK.40,P,138 FOUND IRON BAR R.E.S, t( 414491 �, •-- 5.0 I P LJ M I C) o i Iri b z a' io a' I i� I i� i POWER C)PULE I I I re I I.J a i ^-- 0.84 FOUND TACK \ \ IN LEAD IN \ CONCRETE \ WALK Al \ 1.03 OFFSET I\ 1, 0,3 SEE R.O.S. \\ BK.13, P.95 to FOUND 1/2' IRON BAR AT a� SOUTH EDGE OF ASHPHALT. N 89°47'43' F 134.20 136.01 1 -- 0 AREA=8,839-?SQ.FT, �? uD o -- U —_ S 89°47'43' W 13 .99 GARAGE I _GRAVEL I- DRIVE �Jr-1Fi�8" 85.9 CON- C- _WALK AREA=5,439=SQ.FT. d. , I +"-- ASPFIALT I� DRIVE -- / I. / S.I R. hY 01� AREA=5,9331:SQ.FT, 1030 _ �GONC WALK II 135.96 I ` Go 89"59'41 "W --_— N CONCRETE CURB - 4 C(7NC. 17ti�� LL 1.2 SOUT aq, ry" � Qo:o cis 2� ca W T BUILDING SEE R.O.S. BI<.15, P.266 30 I � 30 ALVE1 WATER METER s r I� ►, a WATER w t ME rER 0�) [I --- a; - 30,00 jol J LJ 3 � I- [Y o U z (, r SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE AT z ��� DAYTON ST. _ EXACT LOCATION IN ALLEY `o' UNKNOWN. Q c? L. US BANK L BUILDING al CATCHJ5�7�/,44 RIM 56"INV, R T 5 DASIN DTFATR FT. RIM 46.7 DR�NM.STRONG FL❑ RIM.1O NO Q `a N SEWEI: MANHOLE I18M 596 56_II rI y RIM 53.62 .4 ] RA Y-I� ON ST � G r 7 r l BRASS DISC INV. 43.4 --`� --- ---SURFACE MON, __ 1II AT 5FT, OFFSET 181.95 PER LEGAL DESC, NOT MUCH -- sS — ss --- SS — FLOW -- SS — -- SS S 89°59'41' W 355,86 MEAS. EXI_STING �_-- POINT ON SEWER SEWER MANHOLE �p P.K. NAIL MANHOLE WITH RIM 47.03 co X-CROSS P.K. R,P. s INV, 36.8 c I - ------ wt. ------------ wt. - - - wL w1- ---_ SITE R,O.S_ W� BK.15, P.266 W�' RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE ............... filed for record this.......... day of ......... 19...... at ...... M in book.... oF........ at page ...... at the request of ALBERT W. CHENOWETH MGR. 11' "SUPT."'OF"RECORDS 1, tr tr m ry O ,O SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE This map correctly represents a survey made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the request of S. EiUT1TRFIELU ...................in NCI,V, 19.2?. CERTIFICATE NUMBER ,,,,9567...... 30 0 3060 90 Scale) 1' = 30' MERIDIAN: R.O.S. BK.18, P.283 (N89°59'41'E) DAYTON ST, LEGEND+ DENOTES A FOUND TACK. • DENOTES AN 24' x 1/2' IRON BAR SET WITH CAP 119567. EH DENOTES A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASING 11<t 1MMAN11 EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE OP OF "R' 1-65.44 ACCURACY MEETS WAC 332-130-090, N CO 05' TOTAL STATION USED FOR A TRAVERSE, � MONUMENTS SHOWN VISITED 10 NOV. 1999, I CATCH BASIN RIM 59.25 �.� 6'INV, OUT 57.45 6'INV. IN 5 7.5 5 E-. 59.81 VERTICAL DATUM; M,L.L.W, BENCH MARIO 'R' ON FIRE HYDRANT Al S.W. CORNER ❑F DAYTON ST. AND 4TH. AVE. S. ELEVATION = 61.35 Fr. LEGAL DESCRIPTION; THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE. SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH, STREET Al A POIN1 THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH, STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 1782213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTONI THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE [IF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREE'ri ]'HENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SS N 89',9T41' E 321,42 MEAS, Surveys * Topography * Sanitation * Short Plats * Formal Plats CH E_N 0WETI-I _ & ASSOCIATES, INC,, P.S. Professional Land Surveyors 18130 Midvale Ave. N., STE. A Seattle We. 98133 (206)-542-2188 * (425)-672-8333 FAX )K (485)--67 -8333 IN THE S.E. 1/4 S.E. 1/4, SEC, 23, T-27--N, R-3--E,. W.M, IN THE CITY ❑F_ EDMNNDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WAS:-IINGTi]N BUTTERf= IELD DESIGN GROUP DWN. BY: PAUL J. PISINGER CHKD. BY: A.W. CHENOWETH DATE: 25 JAN. 2000 SCALE: 1' - 30' JOB NO, I_S F.B. 170 P. 35 SHEET- 1 OF 1 TI_-1490 REGISTERED \ ARCI-IITECT ROBERr STATE OF to z O z O O= %S) OOL V —N o _O > a o �aaa< ARCHITECT OF RECORD —ROBERT BUTTERFIELD PROJECT MANAGER: SRB DRAWN BY -- MG2A/GMW JOB _ _ NUMBER: T DATE: _0 /05/02 DRAW: NO N — O. BUILDING Uri' i . km%zft OWN 4v/ n ,2 SEE R.O.S. BK.18, P.283 6.59 - - _ SUBDIVISION LINE 30.73 _ ` f ! i 143.44 I 30 M Z o vlo v ° p o ro fT1 0 al J cn £ `A POINT ON SEWER MANHOLE WITH X-CROSS P.K. R.P.'s C/) 57-1 5> 1� P$P\A 6' PVC C.O. ? 57°$/ CITY RECORDS SHOW THE SANITARY SEWER TO BE IN THE ALLEY, SEWER RUNS SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE AT DAYTON ST. EXACT L❑CATION IN ALLEY UNKNOWN. Q, //jFDUND /EE R,O,S. BSK,40, P.138 IRON R.E.S. 491 .0 16.00 `° 0 cg 0 0 oCD z m u� I GARAGE I o 0 1 h� AREA=5,439±SQ.FT. o 11 / S 89°47'43' W 135.97 FOUND TACK IN LEAD IN \ CONCRETE WALK AT 1.03 OFFSET \� o \ SEE R.O,S. BK.13, P.95 O FUND 1/2' IRON BAR AT SOUTH EDGE OF ASHPHALT. N 89°47'43' E 134.20 At !! 136.01 AREA=8,839±SQ.FT. LnI JI Q 8 S 89°47'43' W N i.99 , _ _ rGRAVEL�A - - _ _DRIVE 0 0 0 S.F.R. CONC. WALK #128 r. a' POWER DR VELT oP❑LE r, v 0 C° 1 S.F.R. 6� v 1 to0 AREA=5,933±SQ.FT, #130 CONC. WALK C 135.96 1 b� S 89°59'41' W �O.84 o CONCRETE CURB 0.64 CONC. WALL 1.2 S❑UT CATCH BASIN 1 M 52.6 V 51.1 DRAIN M.H. 1 RIM 46.7 N❑ FLOW o H O M .BRASS DISC SURFACE M❑N. ss AT 5FT. OFFSET ss 181.95 PER LEGAL DESC, ss - S 89°59'41' W 355.86 MEAS. SEWER MANHOLE RIM 47.03 o WL WL rni\i Oc o (`') fU 0 0 0 a~ zt- CD 31.81 U-) BUILDING SEE R,O.S. BK.15, P.266 30 ALVE WATER METER r ^a. v; a w WATER Co METER Q, OD 30.00 c(Tsv W v 0 ° 0 0 z r o 0 0 US BANK � BUILDING M 59.24 6' _11 1 <c r IMF RAIN M.H. IM 59.6 SEWER MANHOLE1 18' INV. 56.5 RIMINV.543.4 DA YT O IV � S T ° 18' Fri6+ 18� WL NOT MUCH FLOW ss ss EXISTING P.K. NAIL WL WL SEE R.O.S, WL BK.15, P.266 130 IV 30 0 30 60 90 Scale; 1' = 30' MERIDIAN: R.O.S. BK.18, P.283 (N89°59'41'E) DAYTON ST. LEGEND: DENOTES A FOUND TACK. • DENOTES AN 24' x 1/2' IRON BAR SET WITH CAP #9567. ® DENOTES A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASING FIRE HYDRANT EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE: TOP OF 'R' ACCURACY MEETS WAC 332-130-090. IN CORY 05' TOTAL STATION USED FOR A TRAVERSE. EL=65.44 MONUMENTS SHOWN VISITED 10 NOV. 1999. CATCH BASIN RIM 59.25 6'INV. OUT 57.45 6'INV. IN 57.55 l� IM 59.81 VERTICAL DATUM: M.L.L.W. BENCH MARK: 'R' ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S.W. CORNER OF DAYTON ST, AND 4TH, AVE, S, ELEVATION = 61.35 FT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH. STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N❑.1782213 IN SNOH❑MISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE PINT OF BEGINNING. ss N 89°59'41' E 321.42 MEAS. " 1 WA 126 41 H AVENUE SOUTH I. LEGAL DESCRIPTION BENCHMARK THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, BENCH MARK: "R" ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S.W. CORNER OF DAYTON ST. AND 4TH. AVE. S. TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ELEVATION = 61.35 FT. COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH. STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1782213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; 1HENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ca ;R 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: -1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE -2002 WSUOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION -WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO WSUOT STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION. 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 5, CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND, SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL . AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION ` AND ACCEPTANCE. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 7. TIE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION -OF . THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY' LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. CG ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCA11ON SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. W. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT %A0 HIERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. .15. N/A 16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 17. ALL ROOF DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR IISTAL.LATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. IS, AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION 1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. 20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. 22, THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN. 24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO, PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND .OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND ` OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REQUIRED. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY;OF'.:EDMONDS 72'HRSAN ADVANCE TO' COORDINATE ALL WATER. SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS,' HYDR NT SHUTOFFS. STREET CLOSURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. STEEL PLATES SHALL BE USED iF NECESSARY.7" CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANYs HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL 27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY F. RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS WITH 1H1,: AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING' UTILITIES SHALL _ BE MADE ONLY WITH THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES AND WITH '72 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE.• 28.. EXISTING UTIL ITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY, OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 29. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION. WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. 31. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING. 32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE. APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK. 33. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 34. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT WATER AND SEWER SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD AGREEMENT. 35. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TREES AND STUMPS IN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY IN CONJUNTION WITH THE ROAD WIDENING. SHEET INDEX C1.1 COVER SHEET &GENERAL NOTES C2.1 TESC PLAN &DETAILS C3.1 DRAINAGE PLAN C4.1 WATER &SEWER PLAN EROSION CONTU NOTES 18.30.050 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN. A. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSITATING A CLEARING OR GRADING PERMIT AND ALL UTILITY PROJECTS CONSISTING OF MORE THAN 500 LINEAL FEET OF TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TO PERMANENTLY STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS INVOLVING A CRITICAL AREA MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY COMBINATION OF THE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN APPROVED ESC PLAN. GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING ESC PLANS ARE PROVIDED IN THE MANUAL. THE PLAN MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 1. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS. REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. ; 2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMPS SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). 3. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF` THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. 4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL 1 5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS; B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES; C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT PONDS, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS); D. TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE. 7. ADDITIONAL ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENTS. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF GREATER THAN, OR EQUAL TO, ONE ACRE IN ADDITION TO MEETING THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL COMPLY WITH ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. 8. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - DELINEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. IN THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS AND/OR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE/CRITICAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS, TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES. 9. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - SEDIMENT TRAPPING. PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND OTHER BMPS INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. THESE BMPS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. 10. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CUT AND FILL SLOPES. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. IN ADDITION, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED.IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESC REQUIREMENT NO. 2. 11. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONTROLLING OFF -SITE EROSION. PROPERTIES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN ,THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RAIJE OF STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 12. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. ALL TEMPORARY ON SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM THE EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO-YEAR, 24-HOUR FREQ'UF,NCY STORM FOR THE DEVELOPED CONDITION. STABIUZATTGN ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM QAN'Xq, SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM REACHES: SHALT. BE PROVIDED Af THE OUTLETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. 1 I ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT ENTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED OR OTHERWISE, TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. 1. 14. ESC REQUIREMENT - REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN'� 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 15. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES. DEWATERING SYSTEMS SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT POND. 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES. ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER. 17. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - FINANCIAL LIABILITY. PERFORMANCE BONDING, OR 'OTHER'APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. (ORD. 3013 § 1, 19951 I I\VVLV I JI IL ro �• GUI O tST� ONAL� EXPIRES: 9%5%2003 Mille DRAINAGE NOTES 1) 1� , _ 1. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE. SHALL,; CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 2. ALL PIPE SHALL BE PLACED -ON- STABLEEARTH, 0 -2- 3. E RT , OR COMPACTED GRAVEL MATERIAL.� • BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE OR PIPE -ARCH IN LAYERS / J tj 4 5� 179 0I"7` C> WITH A LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF 6", MAXIMUM DEPTH 8", THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER. �j 5v1 L-- COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. (REFER TO WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 7-04.3(3) AND STANDARD-�_�, �/c>'e- 4.SPECIFICATION 2-03.3(14)C, METHOD B & C. BACKFILL MATERIAL UNDER PAVEMENT (PUBLIC OR'PRIVATE) SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95X �1 }��'i VI � � �r��t/ll'r �1'��D USE REASONABLE CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. 5. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE COUPLINGS, FITTINGS, ADAPTERS & APPURTENANCES �t ' Q� y� 'v SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE INSTALLED' PIPE AND SHALL BE � INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. e� �, o mm 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL' BE TYPE 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.f- 2. ALL CATCH BASINS WITH A DEPTH OVER 5.0 FEET TO THE FLOW LINE SHALL BE A f / TYPE II CO OR LARGER (MANHOLE). 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOLE, INLET, AND CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS AND PAVING. 4. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE SET TO PAVEMENT LEVEL. 5. ALL TYPE 11 CATCH BASIN MANHOLES, INLET, AND CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. �� f71I / -� r 1;+ / M ;D 6. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES / T �`'.c� �' ��� 77AC- � 77� �itI6J o EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN DEPTH. Cly G�� . �� T J C C��--,�# i� 7. CATCH BASIN GRATES IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SET TO FINISHED GRADE NOT Df / BELOW PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS AND SHALL BE LOCKING VANED GRATES. '`� V� E 7 t % / CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE � 7j DESIGN:,„ 1. SCHEDULE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING, CALL ENGINEERING /UDRAWN:INSPECTION LINE AT (425) 771 0220 EXT. 1326 TO SCHEDULE. ����"11. Z FLAG LIMITS OF CLEARING. /���ITS �f�L- / _ T�,W'IJ CHECK: 3. INSTALL` CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 4. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE. �� �Y`'�!� 5. REVIEW ESC CHECKLIST. / JOB N0: 6. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURE INSPECTED BY' CITY �� �j�� DATE: OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ALL TEMPORARY �i ,�{{ SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES- MUST BE IN PLACE 7NDEMOLISH INSPECTEX IS11NG STRUCTURES. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR ,SITE CLEARING. 8. CLEAR, GRADE AND ROUGH GRADE REMAINDER OF SITE.�� ��� � - •�,.. � ��J REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. 9. INSTALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 0. STABILIZE AND REVEGETA ENTIRE SITE. 11. REMOVE EROSION CONTROL�FEATURES AND ESTABLISH ,�,�`- Gy r�-f 07Z-- Ta LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION N F �,.t A /� 0 LY A TER G�� D � 1 67 / l I✓� V � Tf� �� t 4 SITE HAS BEEN COMPLETELY STABILIZED. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ��7 CITY ENGINEER t, • - .!i�TJ if 9101 %!. ii _ A. ,rig .C�� • rat I�t 1 M .U01 it /oozo - DATE u .z M:o � V) N w OW z D 00 0) 0 z < cy- w (/) 0 0•- z 0- `0� 4 ONO `V Q w T••- SHEET: C WK JEG JSH 01136.20 12/6/01 u) Ld F- 0 z __j Q LI z w W;, LLJ Li Z V) D w w W a UI 0 l 9 .SE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT 1-0 CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-4 - 5555. O CT 1?tip AVENUE 120'01 4TH H m „ S M 1 N WA D %toom"o", I LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH. STREET AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH. STREET AND DAYTON STREET; THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1782213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EAST ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ,rat► ; : ► � i 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: -1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE -2002 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION -WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STQRMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO WSDOT STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 4. DEVIA1IONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. 7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. CG ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. .15. N/A 16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERA11ON PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 17. ALL ROOF DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLA11ON OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 19. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. BENCHMi\RK BENCH MARK: "R' ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S.W. CORNER OF DAYTON ST. AND 4TH. AVE. S. ELEVATION = 61.; i FT. SHEET INDEX C1.1 COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES C2.1 TESC PLAN & DETAILS C3.1 DRAINAGE PLAN C4.1 WATER & SEWER PLAN C5.1 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN EROSION CONTROL NOTES DRAINAGE NOTES 20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS F 1R THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE 18.30.050 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR EROSION AND 9. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - SEDIMENT TRAPPING. PRIOR TO LEAVING 1. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS. 2• ALL PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH, COMPLETION OF CONSTRICTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN. THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, N OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. SEDIMENT OR COMPACTED GRAVEL MATERIAL. 3. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE OR PIPE -ARCH IN LAYERS GRADING AND EROSION (ONIROL REQUIREMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING -►HESE A A. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSITATING A CLEARING OR GRADING PERMIT AND ALL U11UTY PROJECTS CONSISTING PONDS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND OTHER BMPS INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL BE WITH A LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF 6", MAXIMUM DEPTH 8", THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER. COMPACTED LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE OF STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. OF MORE THAN 500 LINEAL FEET OF TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. THESE BMPS SHALL BE SIDE OF THE TRENCH. (REFER TO WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 7-04.3(3) AND STANDARD 22• THIS PROJECT IS NOI" A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TAKE PLACE. SPECIFICATION 2-03.3(14)C, METHOD B & C. AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED; AND TO PERMANENTLY STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL RESULTING FROM EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL 4. BACKFILL MATERIAL UNDER PAVEMENT (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SHALL BE COMPACTED ) TO 95X 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED TIRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS INVOLVING A CRITICAL AREA MAY ALSO BE BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. USE REASONABLE CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. CONTOURS OR SPOT SHOWN. REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH ANY COMBINATION OF THE ESC MINIMUM 10. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CUT AND FILL SLOPES. CUT AND FILL 5. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE COUPLINGS, FITTINGS, ADAPTERS & APPURTENANCES SHALL110NS FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5� REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THE SLOPES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE INSTALLED PIPE AND SHALL BE SL SLOPE OPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. IMPLEMENTATION OF AN APPROVED ESC PLAN. GUIDELINES FOR WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. IN ADDITION, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IN INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN PREPARING ESC PLANS ARE PROVIDED IN THE MANUAL. THE PLAN ACCORDANCE WITH ESC REQUIREMENT NO, 2. SHORING EXISTING SHORING AND BRACING LK NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS,EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND MUST ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 11. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONTROLLING OFF -SITE EROSION. PROPERTIES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM DEVELOPMENT SITES 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE TYPE 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL CATCH BASINS WITH A DEPTH OVER 5.0 FEET TO THE FLOW LINE SHALL BE A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT;. AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINSTLOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF 1• ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION ME TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATE CF STORM WATER RUNOFF TYPE II CB OR LARGER (MANHOLE). 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOLEINLET, AND CATCH SHORING AND BRACING, hS REQUIRED. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE.CITY.OF EDMONDS 72 HRS IN ADVANCE TO LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. 12. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF TEMPORARY , BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS AND PAVING. 4. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE SET TO PAVEMENT LEVEL. COORDINATE ALL WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS,' HYDRANT SHUTOFFS `: STREET CLOSURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. STEEL PLATES' SHALL BE USED IF NECESSARY. '.'CONTRACTOR SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. ALL TEMPORARY ON -SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND 5. ALL TYPE II CATCH BASIN MANHOLES, INLET, AND CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS. 6. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR THE Fi t' ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE` MARSHAL. END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED 1 , STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM T�;: EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO-YEAR, 24-HOUR FREQUELNCY STORM FOR THE EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN DEPTH. 7. CATCH BASIN GRATES IN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SET TO FINISHED GRADE, 27. COO 27. COORDINATE AND ARF'ANGE FOR ALl:-UTILITY CONh;EC110NS, UTILITY SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHAD_ BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER. DEVELOPED CONDITION. STABILIZATION ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM BANKS, i" 61:3 AND DOWNSTREAM NOT BELOW PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS AND SHALL BE LOCKING VAN VANED GRATES. RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE INTERRUPTIONSWITH lit -AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY CONPANIES, CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL 2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABIUZA11ON OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL REACHES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE OUTLETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE BE MADE ONLY WITH THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES AND WITH `2 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE. SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICATION OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SYSTEMS. 13. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 28. EXISTING UTILITY LINE`. IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING, ALL BMPS SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN INLETS MADE OPERABLE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED SO THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL NOT ENTER 1. SCHEDULE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING, CALL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION WORK SHAl BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTEE BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM WITHOUT FIRST BEING FILTERED OR INSPECTION LINE AT (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 TO SCHEDULE. 2. FLAG LIMITS OF CLEARING. 29. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION. WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHAD_ REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OTHERWISE TREATED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. 14. ESC REQUIREMENT - REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS. ALL TEMPORARY 3. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 4. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE. ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE hPPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE 5. REVIEW ESC CHECKLIST. 6. HAVE 30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. 3. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. TEMPORARY BMPS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS EROSION CONTROL MEASURE INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ALL TEMPORARY 31. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, RESULTING FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING, 32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. 15. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES. DEWATERING SYSTEMS SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A 7. DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURES. 8. CLEAR, GRADE AND ROUGH GRADE REMAINDER OF SITE. WORK. 33. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION 4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT POND. 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - CONTROL OF REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. SYSTEM. 34. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT WATER AND SEWER SERVICES IN MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION STIES. ALL O POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON SIZE DURING 9. INSTAL_ SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 10. STABILIZE AND REVEGETATE ENTIRE SITE. ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD AGREEMENT. 35. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TREES AND STUMPS IN THE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL 5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER. 11. REMOVE EROSION CONTROL FEATURES AND ESTABLISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION ONLY AFTER CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY IN CUNJUNTION WITH THE ROAD WIDENING. CITY, OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF 17. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT - FINANCIAL LIABILITY. PERFORMANCE BONDING, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL SITE HAS BEEN COMPLETELY STABILIZED. INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT -UNDERGROUND INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS TO ENSURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY COMPLIANCEWITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: PLAN. § 1, 1995] A. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS; B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE - UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES; C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT PONDS, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS); D. TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE. 7. ADDITIONAL ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENTS. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT INCLUDES LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF GREATER THAN, OR EQUAL TO, ONE ACRE IN ADDITION TO MEETING THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL COMPLY WITH ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW. 8. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - DELINEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. IN THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS AND/OR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSITIVE/CRITICAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS, TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES. PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE, DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURP APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION 4CIrTY ENGINEER i I\ VULt_i I JI I L STREET FILE /f` o.Z- DATE 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 ► �. G U.tl EXPIRES: 9/5/2003 1 Y a DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO: 01136.20 DATE: 12 /6 /01 V) LLJ F-- 0 z z LiJ __... z d Li H 00 c;d (n (N w w O 00 Li o z Li < V) Ld :E0 0 1- LJLJ CL 0 > a m 0co0 0 v-- W SHEET: T SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424- 0 C T SE 1/4 WALK Al 1.03 OFFSET SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. FOUND 1/2" IRON BAR AT SOUTH EDGE ///FOUND IRON OF ASHPHALT. ti R.E.S. 491 ON LINE 8.9'4T43"--E 134.20 _. - - 31.81 - 44 ! r t :'! I 136.01 t I W M U-S cc =I I S.F.R. <L EIIZL: I IYI)17AN 1 �c I89*42, « I i IN CORY t .9) ' WA 11. R I MLILR <; WA.---- _ I I 5�PSI 1II I1I r g913'45Z.90Op43 00 _ II Qzop_q00O \ = I�I I EXISTING 8" 00000(0006 WATER MAIN O0©ppp0 0g00pOLU 0p0O0pp© O0)0p000�p090© EXISTING SEWER LINE I OUO0CpIp qp0 qOOqd0OQ -c(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION) 1 OO 0p WAI:R • �,� MLTER =L WA.. ! �IlI%I `t S 89`59 W" ' _.. -. -30.00 - -• -- - -- 41 :0.�4cONC. I WAIL. 1.2 SOU II I I s I OF DLE.D LINE: a cxD C`J (V I f I I f- US BANK I o BUILDING ,c:; I > u.l I i .y CAICII BASIN I I RIM 59.21 I ACH _.__... � Cl BASIN _..CAICII BASIN 6"INV. 57.44_ �'��� I RIM 59.2`i I RIM 52.6 I I - - 6, I 6"INV. OU I- 57.45 INV. ,`i1.i j 6"INV. IN 57.55 APPROX. LOCATION OF 3 I I EX. CURB & SIDEWALK DRAIN M.II. K> RIM 59.6 18" INV. 56.5- 3 I SE:wrR MANiiOLi_. DAYTON ST. _ � RIM 53.62 EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE '� DRAIN M•I I. - - - - -- --- ---- - - - 18 _. _ _ _-�.�__- 1 g . .I IlIM 59.81 INV. 43.�1 DESC. EXISTING SEWER MAI S5_ _ ... ---- - --- --- --- - - ._._ SS- .. ---... .._...-._._.__ -- -- _. _ -_-.-....__ .. _ _ .. ) . .. ---- - -.. .-.. ^i - I 1 S 89 59 41 W 355.86 MEAS. EXISTING I EXISTING SEWER MAIN P.K. NAIL � I - -- - .--.WA - - - --WA. _- _ --WA _. _.__ ... WA -- - - WA- --- _ -WA _. ..._ WA. .- . _. .._.WA. - WA - -WA - ... -.... . _..WA -WA--- * I = 20 0 10 20 THESE PLANS NAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO FILTER FABRIC SECURED TO 2' X 2' 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC EQUAL 2' X 2' WOOD OR II Q ti EQUIVALENT � 8'- 12' 80 PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL, FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINOUS ROLLS. USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE. WIRE MESH SUPPORT F TO SUPPORT FILTER F BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL 8' TO 12' 2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR EQUIVALENT CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN, AE IN REVISIONS MRSM,rr �,� STANDARD DETAIL FILTER FABRIC FENCE FILTRATION SYSTEMS 1890-1990 7/24/01 SCAM NTS DwD No. E1.1 PLACE FILTER AND GRATE. PLACE 7/8' WASHED GRAVEL 3-4 INCHES HIGH AROUND CATCH BASIN TO FILTER WATER, STRAW BALES MAY BE USED IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES (SEE DETAIL E1,1.1) UPON APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONTRUCTION PERIOD. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. REVISIONS STANDARD D ETAI L TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS r8g0-1990 ��' 7/24/01 So" NTS " No. E1.3 WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROV MIN. RADIUS 4'-8' QUARRY SPALLS 8'-12' MIN, DEPTH '01, v so�Fs To � PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ EGRESS AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTR❑ MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN, REVI IONS STANDARD DETAIL STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE �890-1990 — " DATE 7/24/01 NTS NO' E1.2 oil CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - EROSION CONTROL (D FILTER FABRIC FENCE / CLEARING LIMITS PER DETAIL 1, OCLEARING LIMITS. (D CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION PER DETAIL 3. OCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL 2. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION r Y Q DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO: 01136.20 DATE: 12 /6 /01 0 z M m � a N W LiJ 00 0 z LLJ CL z GL O 0 N r- a w SHEET: //s/poZ.- DA G 1-800-424-5555,'=� 1111, 0 C r 1 S zooz BUILDING DEPT. J Ld 0 od z 3 0 a V w SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. wi urrati hco nh Quo ti a 31.81 - - - - a I � , I I I I I of I I ui RIM=57.30 I Q I 4 S I I I OVERFLOW FIRE HYDRANT IE=55.20 � F R 59.0 I TOP O IN CORY 1 3 8" ORIFICE EL=65.44 IE=54.20 I 1 ACC J A W I I 9/16" ORIFICE Co \ I IE=53.60 ° IMCi �3 �=5&83 o \ WATER i V 2iN4" PVC+ i METER - - -WA-� 5=1.09i I / Ne CO. OUTLET 1S�� " CO. 11 h� i r; =2 \ I I OUTLET E==54.6 I SP i 56 0 �� E 59.20 I I IE=51.20 - cm Z 4" PVC, S-1.0% ` 6'N6" PVIt 135.97' m C:1? I EXISTING 8" �, 077.1 DRIVEWAYI S=20% N5=272X� WATER MAIN s I -57:36 w�' 1 IE=50.95 I DIA. ,A► `� I 1 �P III ACCESS MH ACCESS i 59.2 I .3- R58.83 _oqz S 5 IF I f'�4" VC 25'N4 PVO �� - ~WATER I S= 0;� 1.0% ;` `& METER 8'N PVC - - - -WAS 30.00' I I I S 89*59'41 W 21'N4' PVC A --- - -_-= S-40% I 00. J SPOUT - I 72'N4' PVC �� ` CO. I F fE=55.65 (TYP.) 5=4.5% 6E=59.0 I A N 0.64 CONC, I WALL 1.2 SOUTH OF DEED LINE I_ 1 I o I I 4a_ I I N I I N I - CITY RECORDS SHOW THE SANITARY SEWER TO BE IN THE ALLEY. SEWER RUNS SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE AT I ? 1 DAYTON ST. U I US BANI( I g EXACT LOCATION IN ALLEY BUILDING U*> I UNKNOWN, I I I CATCH BASIN RIM 59.24 I CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN 6"INV. 57.44 I 1 RIM 59.25 RIM 52.6 L4 I( j. I 6.. INV. 51.1 Q 16"INV. OUT 57.E , 6"INV. IN 57.5 I �? ��3,� APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CURB & SIDEWALK Io, 1 N DRAIN M.H. Q RIM 59.6 3 G / ft R 7 0 V) „ SEWER MANHOLE 18" INV. 56.5 I /,lO IE' �° RIM 53.62 DAYTON ST. EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE UNE 1811 �'�p 6 18„- DRAIN M.H. INV. 43.4 RIM 59.81 EXISTING SEWER MAIN SS SS Lo INV. 56.7 S 895941" W 355.86 MEAS. EXISTING I 1 s EXISTING SEWER MAIN P.K. NAIL I 'A-----WA ----- WA- --=-WA-----WA•----WA•----WA-----WA-----WA•----WA-----WA-----WA ' / FOUND IRON BAR R.E.S. #14491 16.00 w MIO �I I 5 Sp.SPi� FOUND 1/2" IRON BAR AT SOUTH EDGE OF ASHPHALT, 136.01 S.F.R. 20'N4' PVC B S-1.0% Ill. I CO. 6S-,r PVC `�FE=56.45 \ 5=4 OX 1 \ r';89 47'43" W CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - STORM DRAINAGE CATCH BASIN, TYPE 1. SEE NOTES. CATCH BASIN TYPE 11, SEE NOTES. 8" -DIA. DUCTILE IRON PIPE. 8" DIA. PVD PIPE. DRAINAGE NOTES I. CBj1 WILL BE SET INTO EXISTING 18-INCH STORM PIPE IN DAYTON STREET. CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING STORM PIPE CB#1 SHALL ALSO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH ALLEY 2. CB#2 SHALL BE SET AT BACK OF WALK. 3. CB#2 SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. 4. CB#i SHALL HAVE A LOCKING VANED GRATE. STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" CONC. FLOOR •v •4 ire.• °. 2"0 AIR VENT PIPE ._. WELDED TO TANK b ELEV.=55.20 .a I 4' DIA. ACMP DETENTION PIPE 3' DIA. ACMP I I 3' DIA. ACMP STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" A. =58.85 4 A d .e •.e• •ypd' _a e 4". 10.0, 4' DIA. ACMP DETENTION PIPE 3' DIA. ACMP I I '''elk I INLETy INLET IE=51.20 IE-51.20 ELEV. =5026- 20 41.0 2' 21 °•. a v°' o. ELEV.=49.20 ORIFICE4o a < SIByn . MI Cy►�'C � 2 N. - 4 6 v'• 4 ° v )W CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH DETENTION TANK -- SECTIO o- ° STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" CONC. FLOOR .� ELEV =58.85 i 1) UlA. 3' DIA. ACMP a 0 • ° INLET ELEV. 50.26 IE=51.20 2, 44 4 DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1 = 20 Now zo o l o zo 40 :.�.L-f-'LAN; ___I IAVl__ I._3I__I._N I IId 'I IAld 1) 1 ON A(;I N(''Y Ik'I \/II W AN11) AI;I ';I 0.11 ('I II) (`11ANW1 1)O klO I I I( I' 1'(1I.) ofmo IIaI Ire Ilia`► fu ) MING) Wlt 2"0 AIR VENT PIPE WELDED TO TANK 4' DIA. ACMP DETENTION PIPE ELEV.=51.20 4.0'0 CMP DETENTION TANK STD LOCKING MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN" ELEV.=58.85 ° e- °' 4, < 3'0 CMP RISER MH STEPS 0 12" O.C. WELD OR BOLT TO DETENTION TANK APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION � ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE GNGINEGIRING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 ED.MONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (05) 778-5536 A. G O O +� 25US xs'r�R�� EXPIRES 9/5/1 . G03 o�rips a °°has w 0 a.. ry 0 Z 4 04 <t c'CNI Y Q DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO- 01136.20 DATE: 12 /6 /01 0 z M 00 z L,J O < •�'� � CL � w LsJ ._ o CL O •C[ m O N- � � SHE TcrivaD F a 2 1 I+13 BUILDING DEPT. SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE ___ 3 EAST, W.M. CENTER LINE NEW HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 8"x6" CROSS --j 6" VALVE (TYP.) B9.47'437 .1 134.20 136.01 BLOCKING R.O.W./PROP. LINE POST INDICATOR VALVE L- DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK 6" FIRE LINE VALVE ASSEMBLY VAULT (TO BE VERIFYED) SEE DETAILS TO RISER ROOM FIRE SERVICE PROFILE SCALE: 1 = 10 i I! 1 IW Ir H I f I 72 6 1 j ° �:�� S=1.0% f I 5 !" o - I; N 1 Z r METER i R - T j 1 1 16 V- , a� -- wn 30 00 S $9'594 W { t �t 1`[)i1:.11 I' If. } i CITY RECORDS SHOW THE SANITARY SEWER TO BE IN I ' I �, THE ALLEY. SEWER RUNS SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE AT I ; DAYTON ST. I o I ` EXACT LOCATION IN ALLEY ( ! I c, UNKNOWN. I; j I d; :, i 0 I # - CA ICI I BASIN I I l i RI M 59.24 ` CAICII BASIN I 1­_6"INV. 57.4h- Imo, I I RIM 52.6 t -- INV. 51.1 i I I' I f>F_ --- ----- - I APPROX. LOCATION OF 1 I EX. CURB & SIDEWALK I I DRAIN M.II. RIM 59.6 V)• '56_5 �" SI WI:R MANIIOLI: — I IC� DAYTON ST. " RIM 53,62 _ EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE INV.45,E _.. lf3" .- _�-�'= --- 18 -I EXISTING SEWER MAINSS S 89'59'41 W 355.86 MEAS. SS EXISTING `161' EXISTING SEWER MAIN P.K. NAIL I I --WA - _.._WA -. ._. ._-WA - -WA - --WA. ._.. --WA --WA -WA . WA .....WA. -..__ ..--WA WA- ._......_._. I t 0 10 LRESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED., FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE, SUBJECT30- CHANGE. DO CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - WATER �1 USE EX. WATER METER AND SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION WATER SERVICES. ADD BACKFLOW PREVENTOR AFTER METER. 2� FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. 2" WATER METER. PLUMBING ENGINEER TO VERIFY SIZE. BACK FLOW PREVENTOR LOCATED IN RISER ROOM. �4 POST INDICATOR VALVE ASSEMBLY (PIVA) / ISOLATION VALVE. SEE NOTE 3. 6" FIRE LINE. FIRE SPRINKLER ENGINEER TO CONFIRM SIZE. 6 2-8" RESILIENT GATE VALVES 2-6" RESILIENT GATE VALVE 1-2" RESILIENT GATE VALVE 1-8"0" CROSS ,± I 1-8"x2" TEE jl 1-6" FIRE HYDRANT I j I 2N8" BODY SLEEVES �f ;j 7 DDCVA IN VAULT. PER CITY OF EDMONDS I STD. DETAILS E7.8 & E7.8.1. II I 9 �j ABANDON EX, WATER SERVICE. 9 REMOVE EX. HYDRANT. l' HRE: I IYDRAN I' I' I01, OF "R" �I IN CORY lO NEW HYDRANT ASSEMBLY. �i it �L(I 11.---- 65_44 - '; 10 WATER NOTES gj I 1. ACTUAL ROUTING OF WATER LINE TO BE DETERMINED BY PLUMBER. 2. DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE WATER METER AND LINE SIZES HAVE BEEN PRELIMINARY SIZED FOR AGENCY REVIEW PURPOSES. ACTUAL DOMESTIC 6 WATER AND FIRE WATER METER METER LINE SIZES AND APPURTENANCES ':I I SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR AND/DR THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER AND MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 8 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND I FIRE WATER SERVICE SIZE AND LOCATION WITH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR i EXISTING 8" AND/OR THE MECH. ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROVIDE A 3-FOOT MINIMUM WATER MAIN CLEARANCE TaE FDC AND THE PIVA, 4. REDUCE PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (RPBA) TO BE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING, CALL PUBLIC WORKS FOR INSPECTION. 5. THE WATER TIE IN SITE MUST BE PREPARED PRIOR TO WATER SHUT OFF. THE VALVES, CROSS AND TEE SHALL BE ASSE!VBLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO WATER SHUT OFF TIME. CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES — SANITARY SEWER 1 6-INCH PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE. MINIMUM SLOPE OF 29.. 2 6" SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO EX. SANITARY MAIN. FIELD LOCATE EX. SANITARY SEWER. 3 CLEANOUT. 4 FLOOR DRAIN. 5 4" PVC PIPE. 6 OIL/WATER SEPARATOR, PER DETAIL 1. 7 SANITARY RELOCATION TO BE DESIGNED AFTER FIELD LOCATED DURING CONSTRUCTION IF NECESSARY. SANITARY SEWER MAIN TO BE A MINIMUM OF 5' FROM THE BUILDING. 8 TRENCH DRAIN. RIM=57.2 IE=54.1(OUT) SANITARY SEWER NOTES I. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REM TO CK4RT v 2-1/2" SIAMESE HOSE CONNECTION-4- I (AS REQ'D BY FlRE DET°T) 1 1 �M 'r---•--------- -----------------------4--L-------- ��I PRE -ASSEMBLED, DOH STATE APPROVED I I • 116' a DOUEJLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY ;- ICHECK VALVE• �• Iv Ir `II IILL 1 I _ I 11 I 1 m r I IFT I C p I I FL x rL TEE I x I a ( A AD�IP �RE��O ON 1 1 / BOTH ENDS OF DpCVA I :: a1 GSENSUS SRN W/TRPL 1 :•.f o z I 'm REMDIE READ. THE TRPL SHALL BE I I INSTkLED ON HATCH CURSE TO HINGE rc------------------- - .:. .. cl BLE LEAF UO (MODEL -LW. HATCH- TYPE 0) LADDER PER AP1NA STD PLAN #41 VAULT SIZES AUGN WITH HATCH. GENERAL NOTES: 1. SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS UKE TO ADD 4- OUTLET TEE DOWN STREAM FOR FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION. 2. ACCESSES BY L.W. HATCH: TYPE "D" ( H-10 PEDESTRIAN LOAD; HD-10 TRAFFIC LOAD) 3. VAULT COVER GUTTER DRAIN SHAD. CONNECT TO A DRY WELL OR CATCH HAWN. 4. DDCVA MUST BE TESTED BY A QUALIFIED TESTER WITH PUBUC WORKS PRESENT DURING TESTING. METER SIZE AND TYPE APPROXIMATE EQUIP DIMENSIONS MINIMUM INSIDE VAULT DIMENSIONS (EXCLUDES SIAMESE CONNECTION) A B C D LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT 4" X 3/4" 2'-9" V-1" 0'-6" 4'-3" 10'-0" 5'-0" 7'-0" 6" X 3/4" 3'-9" V-2" 0'-8" 5'-6" 11'-0" W-0" 7'-0" 8" X 3/4" 4'-5" V-4" 0'-9" 6'-4" 12'-0" 6'-O" 7'-0" 10" X 1" W-O" V-8" 0'-11" 8'-6" 14'-6" 7'-0" 7'-0" 1— -1 F-1 I I STANDARD D ETAI L COMMERICAL DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (PLAtI17 DATE 7/24/01 1 SC.AU: NTS WC NO' E7.8 FLOOR DRAIN FRAME JG MATI YN V111310 cn11►,innv ercu-7en -r r v V HLd�O 'NIYV ,,� o r: i�„ y�:}fit' •c3:.r (ayn� IM I W & 0 .Y? o a •;;,y �. w � � va CL 4 La 4 i n n n n � a� Ia to 11 11 11 11 11 � � vto � 11 11 II 9 z � a N9 �c 0 tJ i I c~i u u� 1 1 I i �-z Z °e°ooiuwe e�°r"°ia 8 cr e eeoorr roeo`o eepaare e W � eoor°e:000rar�ee Rik reerora er�arre n c t z , Tn n nse Op o°�i_0� ° ee°°iq� tr J p e, pe •ei1 9r.rPi°r.. 2d 1- 3- !Wq , Ulw "8 l $3 z de r W O 9—N :.y'• �'.+.�••7�e.��yl ,fit. cn 0 tj Lj 0- 0 z xp 3 IN 00, REVISIONS a --STANDARD DETAIL COMMERICAL DOABLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (PROFILE) . a90- t 9gv DATE- 7/24/01 SCALt NTS Bwc NO. E7.8.1 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION rc ENGINEER wh UCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555. �+a�*1a EXPIRES: 9 5 2003 m 0 V) W uj c oz i C,4 O N \ N 0 Q L \ rM to r r r Q DESIGN: DRAWN: JJEG CHECK: JOB NO: 01136,20 DATE: 12/6/01 0 z ..rrj T 0 N W O z LLJ 00 ^'— bi > 3z V) Q CL ~ C.L O C> N � SHEET: z _j n I. L I.L. W^ +w V 86 Lj I.1.. 3 w w In m U SE 1 /4 ON LINE • 44 (.A101 13ASIN RIM 52.6 INV. ')I.I FOUND 1/2" IRON BAR AT SOUTH EDGE OF ASHPHALT. \\ -- --------------- -. --N MAY-E 134 20- 136.01 SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. I \ WAIEIZ 2 1 ' MITER —_-- -- - I WA-- �1 Lid] 16.50' I ( n S fig'A-P 1.50' .. _ I I ' 135.97' EXISTING 8" y� • WATER MAIN oc ' t WA IEIl ME IEIZ 30.00' h �i I f 9 I _ 'T CnTCII BASIN RIM 59.24 i t LA 101 BASIN : G" INV_ `_ 7.4 ._ f ! ? I RIM 59.25 I . INV (i" APPROX. LOCATION OF !' IN .'�/.:i5 (;"INV. - EX. CURB & SIDEWALK I I 1 -- -- --- - _ ._ -- ............ DRAIN M,FI. -- ---- RIM 59.6 �I 18" INV._ 56.5 DAYTON ST. EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE M.II. RIM 59.81 INV. 56. / 16, EXISTING SEWER MAIN —J --WA - wA --W�- - - .._ ._... ---WA -- wA -- - ---- ---WA EXISTING P.K. NAIL I Wn WA _ WA. . _. _ . _. .WA — ._. __ ----WA--.-. , 20 0 10 20 40 ARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION NOTES - SITE IMPROVEMENTS j SAWCUT LINE. FIELD LOCATE AS DIRECTED BY INSPECTOR. 2 PAVEMENT RESTORATION. SEE NOTE 1 AND 2. 3 NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 3 AND 4, SEE DETAIL 1 ON THIS SHEET. 4 NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER ARCH PLAN. SEE DETAIL 2 ON THIS SHEET. 5 PAVENMENT RESTORATION. SEE NOTE 3 & 4. 6 REMOVE EX. SIDEWALK. % EX. CURB CUTS FOR DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED W/ CURBING TO MATCH EX. CURB. $ APPROX. LOCATION OF EX. CURB AND SIDEWALK. CURB AND SIDEWALK DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. SITE IMPROVEMENT NOTES 1. PAVEMENT RESTORATION FOR 4TH AVE. SOUTH SHALL MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. UTILITY CUTS IN 4TH AVE SOUTH SHALL BE BEDDED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CDF. 3. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION IN ALLEY. MINIMUM DEPTH OF PATCH SHALL BE 3-INCHES. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE ALLEY SHALL BE OVERLAID THE FULL WIDTH FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO DAYTON STREET. 5. EX. DAMAGED CURB OR CURB DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY INSPECTOR. POSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY AP •.• • ..v ...v VVVV.�lIVL ;1 ALLEY SECION NTS BUILDING/PROPERTY LINE LINE UP NEW SIDEWALK W/ EX. ALONG THIS EDGE 1 .. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY ENGINEER OVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-8 EX. CURB /,7 0 2- DATE -5555 GUI`N .2.0� WASf1r �' EXPIRES: 9/5/2003 1 Y a DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO: 01136.20 DATE:: 12/6 /01 0 z 0 m :D � CJ �o N W z LJJ 00 � 0z. Cn O aC Ld n CL�.Z CL O O 0No :2U �- c:1 w SHEET: Q.. 2 Lj m L. d �r� `./ ok� CL A Wa m C5ml PZ 171171EIvT -I;� OCT 1 8 09' BUILDING DEPT. L F. & F. ND I -HOUR CORRIDOR WITH SELF CLOSING, A REQUIRED EXIT TO THE EXTERIOR RATED DOORS, RATED GLAZING, FIRE / OF THE BUILDING. SMOKE DAMPERS AT DUCT PENETRATIONS. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. I -HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY. ® 20 MIN. RATED, SELF -CLOSING DOOR. 2-HOUR AREA SEPARATION WALL WITH RATED DOORS AND GLAZING. © (60 MIN. RATED, SELF -CLOSING DOOR. ,FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS. © q0 MIN. RATED, SELF -CLOSING DOOR. BU I LD I Nc1 INFORMATION: GENERAL INFORMATION: ADDRESS: 128 - 4th AVENUE SOUTH - EDMONDS, WA. 15020. OCCUPANCIES: B-(BUSINESS), RI -(RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS), 52-(TENANT STORAGE), 534PARKIN6 GARA(SE). TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-I HOUR (SPRINKLERED) 2-STORIES WITH FIRST FLOOR PARKING. TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 2Q,825 50. FT. GOVERNING CODE5: Icig1 U.B.G., U.M.G., U.F.G., U.P.G., W.S.E.G., V.I.A.C., STATE BARRIER FREE CODE. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: PAVED EAST AND WEST SIDES OF BUILDING. ACTIVE FIRM FROTEOTION: ITEMS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED AS A DIFFERED SUBMITTAL BY A FIRE PROTECTION AGENCY. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (U.B.G. STD. 1-1). FIRE SPRINKLER CONTROL PANEL LOCATION. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM w/ SMOKE DETECTION AND MANUAL PULLS. FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL LOCATION. ILLUMINATED EXIT 516N5. EMERGENCY LIGHTING w/ BATTERY BACK-UP. H.V.A.G. AUTOMATIC, SHUTDOWN. FIRE EXTINGUI5HER5. PA551VE FIRE FROTECTION: ITEMS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS WILL BE PROVIDED AS A DIFFERED SUBMITTAL BY A FIRE PROTECTION A(5ENCY. SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM. ESCAPE WINDOWS AND DOORS FROM SLEEPING ROOMS. I -HOUR RATED CORRIDOR / EXIT PASSAGEWAY. ATTIC DRAFT 5TOP5. ELEVATOR SMOKE DOOR. 51'RUGTURAL FROTEGTION: EXTERIOR LOAD 15 ARI NG WALLS = I -HOUR GARAGE - 2nd FLOOR = 2-HOUR INTERIOR LOAD BEARING WALLS = I -HOUR FLOOR - CEILING = I -HOUR EXTERIOR NON -BEARING WALLS = I -HOUR ROOF - CEILING = I -HOUR STRUCTURAL FRAME = I -HOUR EXTERIOR OPENIN65 = I -HOUR PERMANENT PARTITIONS = I -HOUR STAIR ENCLOSURE = I -HOUR / 2-HOUR SHAFT ENCL05URF-5 = I -HOUR ROOF MATERIAL GLASS = TYPE B IUNIT , I ■ i �I • I —�_ Y I 111111 II ' 111111� IEll— I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I h-ter-1 I 0 �j i I I I I I I I I I I L-1L-J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � i WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 I I I I I I - -I I i I I I I - J PROPOSED TRUCK ROUTE 4TH AV . SOUTH l 1 t t Tx_.-. GOx-x x x x�x �._x TEMPORARY NST ENTRANCE 20 -O \ ' I I ✓/STAGING AREA�� 15 -O x x Z�. r4------- 1 I ,I/ I I I I II I I I I // /// A c000MINWWOFFIGE EVILDINS' - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - APPROVED FOR C RUCTION Ci Engineer Date Now pe-54 RECEIVE DEC - 5 2002 PERMIT COUNTER �et�ors p/, ' b Qom _ ��r Cn no,pd W CV Wzz ¢C Z li ai ry < n a� ❑ o J W � m I -I- w W Qo I..- _1 :n ti Q oIqW �] TL-1490 REGISTERED AR cr ROBERT BUTTER E STATE OF WASHI TON z z z 0 0 ° OL O } Q o 0 Lu �aaaa ARCHITECT OF RECORD ROBERT BUTTERFIELD PROJECT MANAGER: 5RB DRAWN BY: MG2A/GMW JOB NUMBER: DATE: 06/05/02 DRAWING No. I ) LIFE SAFF-TY AND FIRE PROTEGTION FOOTPRINTS NOT TO SCALE - 5 5TACv I NG FLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" FROM SR-104 TO PINE TO TF� RD THIRD AVENUE NORTH 1 � _ 11A�l 0 NO I 1 1, koi�� SCALE: I" = 40'-0" j "CONSTRUCTION AHEAD" WARNING 516N5 AT THE FOLLOWING SPEED '' 1 CONDITION5: UNDER 25 MPH - 500 LF FROM SITE; OVER 25 MPH - 1000 LF. FROM SITE IN"STREET CLOSED" WARNING 51GN AND BARRICADES AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTION DURING UTILITY WORK AND THEN MOVED TO PROPERTY LINE THEREAFTER. "SIDEWALK CLOSED" WARNING 51GN AND BARRICADES AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTION TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE PEDESTRIAN DETOUR. "FLA66ER AHEAD" WARNING SIGNS AT 250'-0" FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE. _ _ APPROVED F®� N TRUCTIONCO CEEnag ine Date RECEIVED DEC - 5 2002 PERMIT COUNTER �et\ors p/ 0°�� z w � O IF Q o0 3: U) Lo (/j N ry Q d z z = 0 Q W In 00 J � m W : H Ld d m W Qo I- J F- u� r ; < ob New TL-1490 \REGISTERED ,. �ARCHI ROBERT I STATE OF � a w w - � tx tx w Q V V N O i Q O O � O aaa ARCHITECT OF RECORD ROBERT BUTTERFIELD PROJECT MANAGER: SPIS DR,ANN BY: MGZA/CMN JOB NUMBER: DATE: 06/O5/02 DRANING NO. IN STATE CERTIFIED FLAGGERS AT 25-0" FROM CONSTRUCTION SITE. G CONES OR BARRICADES SHALL BE PLACED AT 15 TO 30 FOOT SPACING IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO MAINTAIN TRUCK ACCESS. I6'-0" ALLEY 8'-O" V-O" : ADJIONING PROPERTY (GRADE VARIES) SCALE: 1/5" = 1'-0" 155'-II�/8" NORTH PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BU I LD I NC7 BUILDING BEIYOND EXISTINS GRADE AVG. DATUM 60.51FINISHED GRADE ------- ---------------------- ---- - — — 5q.51' Sq.51' 5a.51' BOTTOM OF FOOTING r------------- 5"1.08' — — — — — I 55'-6" SITE _SECoTION SCALE: I/8" = I'-011 FROPOSED BU I LD I NI 7 5TORA6E EXISTING GRADE ------------ FINISHED GRADE AVS. DATUM 60.51' ----------------------------------- =4 5q.O4' 5 1.O4' W Z �I iul SITEown SEE"CoTl u-ol-N E3=-E3, o% � SCALE- Ile)" = I'-O" ADJIONING PROPERTY (GRADE VARIES) 4Q'-6" FIRE HYDRANT TOP OF "R" IN GORY EL=65.44 BUILDING HEI6HTS VERTICAL DATUM: M.LL.W. BENCH MARK: "R" ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S.W. CORNER OF DAYTON ST. AND 4TH. AVE. 5. ELEVATION = (51.55 FT. AVERAGE DATUM FIRST FLOOR 0 GLG. HT.) SECOND FLOOR (5' GLG. HT.) THIRD FLOOR THIRD FLOOR T.O. PLATE (1.5) TOP OF MODULATED ROOF (5.0') MAX. ALLOK HT. (DATUM + 30.09 60.51' 5q.85' 68.85' 85.51' g0.51' 10.51' AVERAGE DATUM HEIGHTS PROPERTY CORNER A: 51.75' PROPERTY CORNER B: 62.16' PROPERTY CORNER C: 61.55' PROPERTY CORNER D: 60.151 TOTAL: 242.04' AVERAGE DATUM: 60.51' (TOTAL / 4) t4AX. ALLOW. HT.: a0.51' (DATUM + 50.0') GRAD I N& CAL C.UL.ATI ON,S TOTAL EXCAVATION: �.,. I,110.3a_aUBIC YARDS TOTAL FILL: / �BC�:�fiBIGUBIG YARDS GUT PROFILE 591.5 90. FT.x 85'-5" = 48,540.151 GUBIG FEET 61.ga' 48,540.151 CUBIC FEET / 2-1 = I,1110.58 CUBIC, YARDS SIDEWALK 4 TH AVE. SO. m �APPROVED BY PLANNING LINE OF EXISTING GRADE LINE OF FOOTING �e�\ors p/� I orb 00 a) : . co = S'�� U) (q N ry w C O i-' S` w Q w a Q 0 J o !� m w : LL > w Q o L6 i-r H LotiQ c"T,w m TL-1490 \ REGISTERED ARCHITECT ROBERT STATE OF BOTTOM OF SLAB. N ii i/ // (3 p ~ W IS) FILL PROFILE L— LINE OF FOOTING i v 280.88 SO. FT.x 85'-5" = 25,450.166 CUBIC FEET 25,450.166 CUBIC, FEET / 2-1= a(ol 18 CUBIC,YARDS Lu V v lri O I N6 PROF I o .. '13 .6RAr;) SCALE: I/I6" = 1'-0" ls) I— `9 29b MAX. APPR'n ED FOR cQ � �TRUCTION V. a a a a Alf ARCH I TEOT OF RECORD Ci Engineer Date ROBERT BUTTERFIELD o PROJECT M,�ANAGER: SR.B 0 12"x IS" 516N OF 4" WHITE STRIPES INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL ON DRAWN BY: ctm - EACH AGGE551BLE STALL p INTERNATIONAL ' SYMBOL ON EA. MOUNTED 4' ABOVE SLAB MOA/CMW AGCE551BLE JOB NUMBER: STALL SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED I VERTICAL TO 48 HORIZONTAL RECEIviE i8 -o DEC - 5 2002 TYP. STALL DETAIL TYP. ACCESSIBLE STALL DETAIL pERMITCOUNT T)O00FIC.,oAL FARi<lNc-:`;m7 STALLS, SCALE: I/8" = 1'-0" - (11 STALLS TOTAL) DATE: 06/05/02 DRAWING NO. !� 51111� A 2 of 2 SEE R.O.S. / BK.18, P.283 6,59 / ~ 30.73 7 30 N Z SUBDIVISI❑N LINE 143,44 6' PVC C.O. 7 \� ti3 a% o /SEWER MANHOLE / RIM 60.4 INV. 51.0 2 yti / 0 Qj 2 EE R.O.S. / /BSK.40, P,136 F❑UND IR❑N BAR R,E.S. l #14491 by L 5.0 16.00 I ,A w I o i*� I (0 0 CD o I ui zI Im, (u (U n CITY RECORDS SHOW THE SANITARY SEWER TO BE IN w THE ALLEY, SEWER RUNS ° SOUTHERLY TO A MANHOLE AT z DAYTON ST. EXACT LOCATION IN ALLEY ¢ UNKNOWN. U J m u� I I GARAGE I Io h� AREA=5" II S 8 I POWER oP❑LE 6� A=5,933±SQ.FT. I I i 135.96 I 0.84 0 0.64 CONC, WALL 1.2 SOUT FOUND TACK IN LEAD IN \ CONCRETE WALK AT 1.03 OFFSET \ ,6 SEE R,O.S, BK.13, P,95 O FOUND 1/2' IR❑N BAR AT a~ SOUTH EDGE ❑F ASHPHALT, N 89'47'43' E 134.20 Z 136.01 AREA=8,839±SQ.FT. S.F.R. S 89.47'43' W 135,99 GRAV___EL __ _- DRIVE___ S.F.R. 85.9 ).FT. °, 3' W ASPHALT DRIVE cq S.F.R. 61 4130 _ J I 6 S 89'59'41' W I'o _a / Z� 0 � � w 31.81 uuii IBUILDING SEE R,❑,S, BK.15, P.266 I 30 = 30 �/1 r FIRE HYDRANT TOP OF 'R' IN C❑RY VALVE I EL=65.44 WATER w METER c r w WATER METER 6O m GN 30,00 � (u W J a 3 v W O ~ o W o o' U z Z £ O U r N 0 0 o US BANK � BUILDING CATCH BASIN RIM 59.24 CATCH BASIN RIM 52.6 L INV. 1.1 DRAIN M.H. I DRAIN M.H. RIM 46.7 zo SEWER MANHOLE 18M NV 5 NO FLOW -BRASS DISC ti INV, IM 543 4 DAYTON ST. _3.62 -BRASS MON. NOT MUCH - SS AT 5FT, OFFSET SS181,95 PER LEGAL DESC. SS SS SS FLOW S 89'59'41' W 355,86 MEAS. EX: r=- CATCH BASIN RIM 59.25 6'INV, OUT 57.45 6" I 6'INV. IN 57,55 m I F-I LL-- 6' -- DRAIN M.H, —18'- RIM 59.81 j / w P.K. NAIL POINT ❑N SEWER SEWER MANHOLE MA \ NH❑LE WITH RIM 47,03 M wL wL wL uL uL SEE R,O,S, wL X-CROSS P.K. R.P,'s INV. 36.8 BK,15, P.266 N 30 0 30 60 90 Scale, I' = 30' MERIDIAN, R,O,S, BK,18, P.283 (N89'59'41'E) DAYTON ST. LEGEND { DENOTES A FOUND TACK. • DENOTES AN 24' x 1/2' IRON BAR SET WITH CAP #9567. ® DENOTES A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE, ACCURACY MEETS WAC 332-130-090, 05' TOTAL STATION USED FOR A TRAVERSE. MONUMENTS SHOWN VISITED 10 NOV. 1999. VERTICAL DATUMi M,L.L,W. BENCH MARKi 'R' ON FIRE HYDRANT AT S,W, CORNER OF DAYTON ST, AND 4TH. AVE, S. ELEVATION = 61.35 FT. LEGAL DESCRIPTI❑Ni THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLL❑WSi COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF 4TH, STREET AT A POINT THAT IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF 4TH, STREET AND DAYTON STREETI THENCE WEST 126 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF THE ALLEY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 1782213 IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGT❑Nj THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ALLEY TO A POINT THAT IS 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTERI THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 105 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER TO THE EST LINE OF 4TH STREET] THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ss N 89'59'41' E 321.42 MEAS. IN THE S,E, 1/4 S.E. 1/4, SEC. 23, T-27-N, R-3-E, W,M, IN THE CITY OF EDM❑NDS, SN❑H❑MISH COUNTY, WASHINGT❑N > RECORDER S CERTIFICATE ............... SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE Surveys * Topography * Sanitation * Short Plats * Formal Plats filed for record this.......... day of ......... 19...... (it ...... M This map correctly represents a survey made by me CHENOWETH B U TTE R FI E LD DESIGN GROUP in book ...... of,,,;,.„at page ,,,,,,at the request of or under my direction in conformance with the ASSOCIATES, INC., P.S. ALBERT W. CHENOWETH requirements of the Survey Recording Act at the DWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO. LS ""..... """""""""""""""""' request of S..,BUTTERFIELD................... in KY ........ 19.K Professional Land Surveyors 18130 Midvale Ave. N., STE. A PAUL J. PISINGER 25 JAN. 2000 F.B. 170 P. 35 .................................. ........,,,,.,,.. ,,, ,,,........... , ,.,,...,,...,,., ,,. ,,, .... Seattle Wa. 98133 CHKD. BY: SCALE: SHEET MGR. SUPT. OF RECORDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER 9567.......... (206)-542-2188 * (425)-672-8333 .... FAX )K C425)-672-8333 A.W. CHENOWETH 1" = 30' 1 OF 1 RF.CEIVED DEC - 5 2002 PERMIT COUNTER �et\ors p/a °1d Qom Cn (n CV W 0 2) Z u- Q W CL Q O J � m W LL Ld W Qo L0 < m N 'T W TL-1490 REGISTERED ARCHITECT L.ROBERTRFIELD STATGTON LU � wl` is >: LU z OL Q w � O } O < s LU -tom [l� V i:j 0L CV LU x x z z z O ~ OiL ks) Q tY tY uN�� ilk w 0 V v W N o z O aaaa ARCHITECT OF RECORD ROBERT BUTTERFIELD PROJECT MANAGER: 5RB DRAWN BY: MOA/CMW JOB NUMBER: DATE: 06/05/02 DRAWING NO. �^J 29 -multelotima, PA:RKN2 REQUIREMENTS OFFICE A nAs OFFICE NO. 1 (2,525 SOFT. / SOO) = 5.00 STALLS CONDOMINUIM A►RE65 A PnMn/]a, a 7 ATAI 1 4 PIZ-12 I]MIT= IA /" d;TAI I A TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: KOO 5TAL1.5 TOTAL PARKIN& PROVIDED: _20.00 STALLS tJ f vx�a K0-LpV)v-v---n lu tArc* S I-D L c s-f--�f 7— -/�/o 3 APPROVED BY PLANNING o47-1 1.4--yoWe-owl9 APPROVED BY ENGINEERIN13 ��l/151d� C1 Gt3 E Lu U . 0 °uu�'., m � X 'N� m 0 � acc CC enla 0 c� aE•• E faW1�1641 O J 3605 REGISTERED V--� ARCHITECT JOHN F. TAYLOR STATE OF WASHINGTON tu 0 0 0 QL ) 0) • lu a � v � o O aaaa v- ARCHITECT Or- RECORD JOHN TAYLOR PROJECT MANNA (SER: SRB DRA INN BY: MQA�/GMW JOB NUMBER: DATE: Ob/05/02 DRAWING NO. BUILDING DEPT. SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 127 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. wj urr=j r/IV CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - STORM DRAINAGE T CATCH BASIN, TYPE 1. SEE NOTES. ti 2 ` C� CATCH BASIN TYPE 11, SEE NOTES. a� 8" DIA. DUCTILE IRON PIPE. FOUND 1/2' IRON BAR AT ��,, C! 8" DIA. PVC PIPE. SOUTH EDGE o� FOUND IRON OF ASHPHALT. �,�' DRAINAGE NOTES BAR R.E.S. 1. Ca#1 WILL BE SET INTO EXISTING 18-INCH STORM PIPE IN DAYTON #14491 STREET. CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT OF 3181 EXISTING STORM PIPE. CB#1 SHALL ALSO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH ALLEY 4 - --N 8947'43!-E 134.20 2. CB#2 SHALL BE SET AT BACK OF WALK. - - - 16.00 I - - - - - 136.01 Q 3. C8#2 SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. 4. CB#1 SHALL HAVE A LOCKING VANED GRATE. STD LOCKING MH FRAME I & COVER MARKED 'DRAIN" =8_s5 - • j I STD LOCKING MH FRAME f 4 ' d d .. ,.. &COVER MARKED 'DRAIN' CONC. FLOOR LAII +. �I I I RIM=57.30 .� m: A. uj 4 d i I �' a :. . • d. ' 'd. � 2tY�4" PVC .� ( � •A • � . ,• ' ... • ° , a4 :. 2"0 AIR VENT PIPE �"• S=1.0% MN. 1 I WELDED TO TANK 2 1 10.0' B 63YN4" PVC I I FIRE HYDRANT OVERFLOW ELEV.=55.20 co• "� 5=4.�?X C�� I I TOP OF "R° IE=55.20 4 a IE 56.45 d IE 59.0 EL 65.44 „ ��F9 t 1 3 $ IE= ORIFICE420 Nv t ACCESS A - WA I oo 91; ZN- 9/16" ORIFICE: -4 4' DIA. ACMP 4' DIA. ACMP CO. I£=53.fi0 DETENTION PIPE DETENTION PIPE IE 54.8 I I 3' DIA. ACMP 3' DIA. ACMP 3 DIA, 3' DIA. ACMP � } � D \ WATER I 21,4 PVC \ METER Q I II 1 CO. e a - -WA- S=9.t?% - - � I OUTLET it4 S'2 \ 6� ffE--59.2ti I IE=51.20 _ INLET INLET IE =54.6 1SQ I / 56 _ I . 1 I IE=51.20 ELEV.=r0.26 IE=51.20 __ _ ��4 m PVC, 5=1.4� 6'N6' PVI 135.97' :!"� EXISTING Er 2' 41.0' 2' : °: % : a. A °: 2t 2 I } tiBStRVI. S-=2U I I WATER MAIN I S=-27M cq EEV.=49.20 d RN�7.15 ``' I a >< 'Q I ORIFICE =50.95 I Dl,il. A m I c3 ..0 e P } ACM '! A MH 6 _ 1E=59.2 Q � a 2 MIN. i5WATER S=1.iI'X j N4 Y6, P11CSs 1.{1XX '�' Q METER - - -WA- I i ° ' . a 4 ' A a 4 b e d o,;4 8 -' PVC - a ` o a ° 5=1. 30.Oi? S 89'S9'41" W 21'-4! PVC PS _ T - - 72'w4• '•° ' i ..t ► CDNTRt L STRUCTURE T H DETEN1 ION TANK -� _ SEC11ON A uumarwi F.=,%65 I .o I i NTs 0.64 CONC. I I WAIL 1.2 SOUTH 1 OF DEED LINE I � I p I � I I STORM SEWER MOVED 6.00' I 4 Fj20M INTIAL PROPOSED LOCATION I I I IN WI I I �p I CITY RECORDS SHOW THE f 1 � I w 4 I US BANK I I BUILDING Lo I I UNKNOWN. r I 1 d I CATCH BASIN ( I RIM 59.24 I CATCH BASIN I 2 6"INV. 57.44 I RIM 59.25 CATCH BASIN 6.. Q 16°INV. OUT 57.1 RIM 52.6 i '� I 6"INV. IN 57.5 INV. 51.1 I RU=5= APPROX. LOCATION OF I I I IE=Ml1 EX. CURB & SIDEWALK I c, �-- ---------- --� I L--- 1 o DRAIN M.H. Q RIM 59.6 �I 18" INV. 56.5 I In N SEWER MANHOLE i -�• �" ��I t�llw1 2.97 � RIM 53.62 DAYT' IV S 1. EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE 18" p 18"--1 DRAIN M.H. RIM 59.81 INV.43.4 ¢ INV.56.7 EXISTING SEWER MAIN SS SS B EXISTING I S 89'59'41' W 355.86 MEAS. P.K.-NAIL NAIL EXISTING SEWER MAIN I 'A-----WA-----WA• - ---WA----WA.----WA-----WA-----WA•----WA•----WA '----WA•-- --WA DRAINACI SCAT F. V = THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW SUBJEC 20 ANGE. D STD LOCKING MH FRAME & OVER MARKED "DRAIN" CONC. FLOOR ELEV.-58.85 , d d .4., d a. ° a a 4 R ' A. o' 4 a. i • e A• a • a •e '• O 3' DIA, 3' DIA. ACMP AN . e v ° INLET IE=51.20 .• t' Q Q° ,n° .• as NTS 0' lO 2'0 4'0 N )T USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING 00 AIR VENT PIPE WELDED TO TANK 4' DIA. ACMP DETENTION PIPE DETEN . SE ELEV.=51.20 Nv 4.0'0 CMP DETENTION TANK STD LOCV,!NG MH FRAME & COVER MARKED "DRAIN' ELEV.=58.85 A. A' SO CMP RISER MH STEPS 0 12' O.C. WELD OR BOLT TO DETENTION TANK APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION As ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER OSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU. APR ' C � 3 HATE 1-800-424-5555. 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 C5 a c�nc � o ell co x Q DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO: 01136.20 DATE: 12/6 /01 0 z 00 t!7 Lj 0 �00 t) 0z 1, LJJ W = C) M to z Q. ocom EuNn v- W SHEET: z i". .......... 1� t, t SE 1/4 SE 1/4 -SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. R.O.W./PROP. LINE CENTER LINE POST INDICATOR NEW HYDRANT CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - WATER VALVE ASSEMBLY USE EX. WATER METER AND SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION L.--� WATER SERVICES. ADD BACKFLOW PREVENTOR AFTER METER. BLOCKING qj FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK 6" ARE LINE 8"6" CROSS ( S ] 2" WATER METER. PLUMBING ENGINEER TO VERIFY SIZE. VALVE ASSEMBLY VAULT (TO BE VERIFYED) 6" (,.) t 1 BACK FLOW PREVENTOR LOCATED IN RISER ROOM, r'Tn SEE DETAILS R ROOM POST INDICATOR VALVE ASSEMBLY (PIVA)' / FIRE SERMCE PROFILEISOLATION VALVE. SEE NOTE 3. SCALE: 1 1 Q � 6" FIRE LINE. FIRE SPRINKLER ENGINEER TO CONFIRM SIZE. ___N & '431f 134.20- 16.00 136.41 2-8" RESILIENT GATE VALVES 2-6" RESILIENT GATE VALVE 1­2" RESILIENT GATE VALVE i 1-8"X6" CROSS I I I 14*x2" TEE I 1-6" FIRE HYDRANT Q 2-8" BODY SLEEVES DDCVA IN VAULT PER CITY OF EDMONDS QI I I STD. DETAILS E7.8 & E7.8.1. Mlg u i �I I ABANDON EX. WATER SERVICE. . S.F.R. 2 2156 4 �j RI�1=5&10 I REMOVE EX. HYDRANT. I 1 FIRE HYDRANT TOP OF "R" LE=55.#7 IN CORY1 NEW HYDRANT ASSEMBLY. 515 • �- � EL=65.44 0 1C WATER NOTES 1. ACTUAL ROUTING OF WATER LINE TO BE DETERMINED BY PLUMBER. WA 11 2 : I 2 DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE WATER METER AND' LINE SIZES HAVE BEEN PRELIMINARY SIZED FOR AGENCY REVIEW PURPOSES. ACTUAL DOMESTIC METER - - -WA Q WATER AND FIRE WATER METER METER LINE SIZES AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE 0 I MECHANICAL ENGINEER AND MAY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 62 I N I I CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ACTUAL REQUIREMEN75 FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND ARE WATER SERVICE SIZE AND LOCATION WITH D�GN BUILD CONTRACTOR I l 135.97' t Q " AND/OR THE MECH. ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CO, co I EXISTING 8 3. PROVIDE A 3-FOOT MINIMUM CLEARANCE THE AC AND THE PIVA. p IE=55.14 I � L,ti.j I WATER MAIN 4. REDUCE PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (RPIh) TO 8E LOCATED INSIDE 8 LF I [ I I THE BUILDING, CALL PUBLIC WORKS FOR INSPECTIft " 5. THE WATER TIE IN SITE MUST BE PREPARED PHOR TO WATER SHUT OFF THE VALVES, CROSS AND TEE SHALL BE ASSEMBLE AND INSPECTED PRIOR PSQ pm t6 S Q TO WATER SHUT OFF TIME ATER METER 16 LIF S 89 a9'4i" W z , 2-1/2" SW ME HOSE 4tiM I I (AS KQ*D W RRE OEFO WALL 1.2 SOUTH ''. ------ ......------------ Q •` 1 1 OF DEED LINE i PRE-MNUEu. DOH STATE APPROVED DOUSE DE4 =R CHECK VALVE ASSD1OL 1EM v I I iliN. 1 STORM SEWER MOVED 6.00 u 1 F OM INTIAL PROPOSED LOCATION I 1 I I I 1 � { N I I I z 1 A CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES - SANITARY SEWER 6-INCH PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE. MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2%. U 6" SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO EX. SANITARY MAIN. FIELD LOCATE EX. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT FLOOR DRAIN. 4" PVC PIPE. OIL/WATER SEPARATOR, PER DETAIL 1. REPLACE EX. CONIC. SANITARY PIPE WITH NEW 8"0 D.I.P. SEE PROFILE ON SHEET C4.2. TRENCH DRAIN. RIM=57.2 IE=54.1(OUT) SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. z r I SENSIS SMI 1YjiRP1 3 + 1 io REAI(IE READ. THE 7RPL SFW 1 BE 1 ' -4 Q ..r -- tN DIED ON HATCH =sE TO HME - ...__ --__ ..11 i° . w 84E LEAF LID (AIODEI-t»W. HATCH- TYL'E is) WDER PER AFWA STA PUN #41 U5 BANk I I ( VAULT SIZES AUGN IM HAMN. BUILDING I I i I GENERAL. NOTES: I I BASIN I I 1. SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS L.KE TO ADO 4" OURZT TEE DOWN STREAM FOR FIRE DEFT. CONNECTION. CATCH RIM I 2. ACCESSES BY L.W. HATCH: TYPE "D" ( H-10 PEOESTRIAN LOAD: HD-10 TRAMC LOAD) CATCH BASIN 3. MWL.T COVER GUTTER DRAT SHALL. CONNECT TO A DRY WELL. OR CATCH &AM. 6"INV. 57.44 I RIM 59.25 4. DDCVA MUST BE re51 8YA QUAI.tF'1ED IESI WITH PUBLIC WORKS PRESENT DURING T=NG. CATCH BASIN RIM 52.6 , I I 6" 6"INV. OUT 57.45 INV. 51.1 6"INV. IN 57.55 I APPROX. LOCATION OF I I EX. CURB & SIDEWALK ----- i---- ------=-----� I� L - -- DRAIN M.H. Q = RIM 59.6 �I 18" INV. 56.5 I SEWER MANHOLE DAYTON ST. ° RIM 53.62 EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE LINE i 6 i I DRAIN M.H. INV. 43.4 18 18 RIM 59.81 METER SIZE AND TYPE APPRaX1iiATE EQUIP DIMENSIONS MINIMUM INSIDE VAULT DIMENSIONS (EXCLUDES SM"ESE CONNEL7M) A 8 C D LENGTH WIDTH HEK;HT 4" X 3/4" 2'-9" :1'-1" 0'-5" 4'-3" 10'-0" 5'-p" 7'-a" 6" X 3/4" 3'-9" 1'-2" 0'-B" 5'-6" 11'-O" W-0" 7'-0" 8" X 3/4" 4'-5" 1'-4" 0'-9" 6'-4" 12'-D" 6'-D" 7'-O" 10" X 1" W-0" 1'-8" 0'-11" 9'-6" 14'-6" 7'-0" 7'=0" EXISTING SEWER MAIN INV. 56.7 - SS S 89'5941" W 355.86 MEAS. SS SS EXISTING { ::...: ' ID: M •0 ' N. ' 0 ' . -- - P.K. NAIL REVI \\ EXISTING SEWER MAIN I STANDARD D ETAI L _WA_ - - - -WA- - - - -WA- - - - -WA - - - -WA• - - - -WA• - - - -WA - - - -WA- - - - -WA- - - - -WA- - - - -WA- - - - -WA COMMERICAL DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY (PLAN) 1-99n-1990 DATE 7/24/Dt I SCAM NTS wo No. E7.8 WATER &SEWER PLAN a 0 ,o z0 .0 A scuE = v THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDrNG PURPOSES WI FLOOR DRAIN MAUC 0. f%DATr ntv►!nil% rr%iik1nnv fl(`ttYL•n 'a90-I99" iimmrir lit -MA •i.tiW 1 n � >� 0 a 1 x QO oC3 c;2 �U oaog'ta"a"OOpyy eo♦ea i nidp°a •�°� oZi � � "' ' AY•OP' R AA • OaiD.}y��4 i�i A• OdO�O¢i�►•. ;O 1I 6f? T. y -E.O.M. r*vs10N5 STANDARD DETAIL arc COMMERICAL 13OU 3LE M-Won CHECK ASSEMBLY (PROF p VATE 7/24/01 SCALE Dwo NQ. NITS I~7.6.y APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE T SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-55 GNGING6RING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGT'ON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 �. w1. :;�' mmo t_ O 1= m � DO 5 cn t w g4= Lc"=Wcn c� a 0 Y aC DESIGN: CVVK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: ,JSM JOB NO: 01136.20 DATE: 12/6/01 0 z M D 00 LL.j � 00 CSC 0z V ri w LJJ = I) CL i-~ `- Z CL 0 ONO `2 v-- r-) w SHEET: z CL w L Vi. I 4d Li LMJ Li in 3 I� v t s -.I ITHFSF PLANS HA PARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUB 60 WN 52 wrl SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. REMO k APPROX. KW OF EX. CORI PIPE & REPLACE Wf DIP i r r i �G � r r � L0 a. 10CB 10 + STA. 1+50.50 $ RIM=57.15 . a g"VCSTORM PIPE S=0.5% EXISTING GRADE 'D' • EX. T CONQ PIPE ._-- "' CONNECT @ NEAREST BELL W/ ROMEX COUPLER CV � to m 1+00 SEWER SERNCE PROFlLE xaR lo _ zo VEx i = 0 CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOS 2+00 2+21.56 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION UT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CA w'9lca DATE F YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555. AOL 6NGINeERHYG 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 I, EXPIRES: --- 9 5 2003 �G n m cc �md U Q R cn fd fan � w to c Y L� Q DESIGN: CWK DRAWN: JEG CHECK: JSH JOB NO: 01136, 20 DATE: 12/6/01 Li 0 ..j I 0 CL rr co 00LLJ Li 0 �+ 00 � ("3) W < Ld > 3: V) LJ 3: Q: 3 Ci ~,� z WLij �I 0 00 :2� O N L...1 �- w V) SHEET: