Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
130 2ND AVE S (2).PDF
1111111111114853 130 2ND AVE S �,,. �.: � � .�.t�,:. ��,�'���.. ��� '�. § cAk' r�.,� Sign Review Checklist SITE ADDRESS: I Alt_ PERMIT #: 15 LlJ 20 ZONE: -SIGN DISTRICT: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: 00 rkatwr, TOTAL MAXIMUM PERMANENT SIGN C -F/l�() oef (ECDC 20.60.025): w n k) A/ iI MAXIMUM NUMBER Of SIGNS ALLOWED (ECDC 2 .60.025)� all�_ D r� Old EXISTING SIGN AREA IN USE AT SITE/BY TENANT: T �' v— nM� J� 6f EXISTING. NUMBER OF SIGNS IN USE AT SITE/BY TENANT: Ul ( fe/ 0 �� ex(i K(I_r I , J Permitted Matrix Proposed Illumination in District? Conditions Met? Sign Type (Y/N or Type) (ECDC 20.60.0201) (ECDC 20.60.020.M) SIGN 1 CAJA41 . SIGN 2 S SIGN 3 SIGN AREA (ECDC 20.60.030, 20.60.040 and 20.60.045): G 1. Maximum Area: Proposed Area: y 2. Maximum Area.' 3. Maximum Area: Proposed Area., Proposed Area: SIGN HEIGHT (ECDC 20.60.030, 20.60.040 and 20.60.045): ' / r 1. Maximum Height: .0.6c Qla Proposed Height: Lct(e_ Gt�v i Z 2..Maximum Height: 3. Maximum Height: Proposed Height:, roposed Height: 1A1ibrary\p1anning\forms & handouts\staff reports\Sign review checklist.doc FOR FREESTANDING SIGNS ONLY: CRITICAL AREA FILEM SIGN LOCATION (ECDC 20.60.045.E): If over 3 feet, meets setbacks? Required Setbacks: • Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Proposed Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: LANDSCAPING: (ECDC 20.60.045.G) r Square feet required: Does existing landscaping satisfy re uirement: Y/N Landscaping bond amount. NOTES4LZ / S °�Cg Plan Review By: / DATE 3 l:\library\planning\forms & handouts\staff reports\Sign review checklist.doc TOXGT INFO; MA GALG5; IEPLACE EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING LENGTH - 75' VIOUNTED SIGN WITH NEW BUILDING FACE AREA -1300 sf VERSION. NON LIT: SIGN AREA -19.2 sf SIGN AREA AS PERCENT OF BUILDING FACF .• 19.2/1 M =1.599 :amopas, WA 125-775-0594 0:4wAMj,!JVFIi PROMPTY INFO PARCEL ID: 0087150001010C LOT AREA - .25 ACRE ,M Asa 30 2nd Avenue! dmonds, WA 91 Past Plevati�►n - Pro osed;/'ttgn 1 1/8._V-0„ U— 4L— a,. -- M- -- l�„1„/`ign Detail - Proposed ��w� �4��� �Tae NOV 14 2013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES i n ho rn on Nili in - Proposed No Scale 510-Klnq 5W5 Lc' ncW A 5xia* 2 of 3 Edmonds, WA 5ign kepi 130 2nd Avenue S — 425-775-0594 ' Edmonds, WA 98020 U 11/11/13 LANDAU ASSOCIATE �1Ori Colors - Top Layer No scale COLORS, IMP - PM5 tip 007 MACK .25" ALUMINUM SHEET WATEu—r CUT PO VMR COAT COLOR & CLEAR COAL FROW IVE FIN15H MOUNT TO DOTTOM LAYER WhH 5M"TAPE 01�- ,5 NOV 14 2013 .125" ALUMINUM 5HEET WA1EUf CUT BOAT TO MATCH AND CLEARCOAT MCTNE FINI5H DEVELOPMENT', SERVICE: COUNTER EXI511NJ6 WAU. 5TU1G0 1INI1I I"xl"x ,125" ALUMINUM MOUNING TUDE POWDEPCOAT TO MATCH DULDING AND CLEARCOAT FROTEC1WE FIN15H 1 i i O 8) - # 14 x 5" 5TMU55 1 MOUNTING 5CREW5 AND ANCHORS 3 n - action _ 5no-K � �s ;. A Landau ssolc�ate5 3 of 3 i Edmonds, WA 5 �e la�err�err� . �•- p -� L - � 130. 2nd Avenue S V 425-775-0594 Edmonds, WA $8020 11/11/13 APPROVED AS NOTED - .CITY OF - EDMONDS - - -BY V�P��EERING BUILDING DEPARTMENT - WORK V) ADDRESS 7 Date: OWNER _ h. j l APPROVED DATE: BLDG. OFFICIAL PERMIT STREET, FILE N MBER 20I RECEIVED NOV 14 2013 eity Of Edmolg1Id1I�g De a DEVELOPMENT SERVICES p rtment COUNTER APPRoD PLAN , IM010019 07/01/98 10.19 P-0004 Recorded Snohomish County CITY CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NO. EDMONDS, WA 98020 COVENANT TO NOTIFY AND COVENANT OF RESTRICTION 1JI'!: s 1 d S 40P6l up.-r( ES/ L, L, 0 WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner(s) is an applicant for a building permit for property located at 130 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington; and WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building Code adopted as the State Building Code requires that certain occupancy type building openings must be protected if within ten feet of a property line and must be one hour rated or for V-N and V-1 one hour construction when located within 20 feet of the property line; and WHEREAS, UBC Section 503.1 states in part, "For the purposes of this section, the center line of the joining public way shall be considered an adjacent property line"; and WHEREAS, if the center line of the alley adjacent to 130 2nd Avenue South were utilized to determine the setback, an 8-foot setback would be created and all openings on the west side of the 130 2nd Avenue South building would be required to be protected; and WHEREAS, the subject site and alley are adjacent to a city park and the applicant has requested that the city utilize both the full width of the alley and a portion of the park property in order to determine the application of Chapter 10's requirements; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to permit such utilization if, but only if, future owners of the property are notified by covenant recorded in the land records of Snohomish County of restrictions on the use of the site and the Owners of the property on behalf of themselves, successors and assigns agree to come into prompt compliance with the then applicable provisions of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes if the city sells the property, redevelops it in a way which eliminates all or a part of the 20-foot required minimum distance between buildings or in the event of an expansion or change in use of the 130 2nd Avenue South building, Now, Therefore The owners of certain real property described herein in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as if set forth herein and located at 130 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "Owners") and the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") have entered into this agreement under the terms and conditions set forth herein and in consideration of. the mutual benefits to be derived: 1. Covenant to Notify. The Owners on behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, promise to notify all future purchasers of the property of the existence of these covenants and to record this agreement, at their expense, in the land records of Snohomish County. This agreement shall not be binding upon the City until these covenants are recorded. In the event the Owners fail to record, the City may require immediate compliance with the full requirements of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes as then applicable including MICROFILM- application of the provisions of UBC Section 503.1 and Chapter 10 requiring building openings to be appropriately protected and fire construction ratings in accordance with the terms of these codes. 2. Covenant to Comply. The Owners on behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, agree that in the- event any. of the contingencies listed hereafter occur, the property shall be brought into prompt compliance with the then current requirements of the Uniform Building Code adopted as the State Building Code and as amended by the City of Edmonds, including, but not limited to, any requirement for the protection of windows or the alteration of the construction ratings in order to achieve full compliance with the provisions of the codes. This requirement to come into compliance may be triggered by any of the following circumstances: 2.1 The City sells all or any part of the property currently utilized as a city park and legally described on the attached Exhibit B, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth (hereinafter "city park"). In the event of a sale of a portion of the property, this covenant shall be triggered if, but only if, the portion sold, or any portion thereof, lies within the area utilized for the required 20-foot building separation under this agreement. 2.2 The city park is redeveloped in a way which utilizes all or any portion of the 20-foot minimum distance between buildings thereby requiring protection of building openings or a change in construction to meet required fire ratings. 2.3 Any future expansion or substantial remodeling of the building located at 130 2nd Avenue South (" 130 2nd Avenue South Building"). Substantial remodeling shall mean remodeling of the building at a cost equal to 30 % or more of its fair market value at the date of submission of the building permit application. 2.4 Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the legislative discretion of the Edmonds City Council to sell all or a portion of the city park described in Exhibit B or to develop the park in any way which it deems consistent with the public interest of the citizens of the City of Edmonds. Similarly, nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the discretion of the owners, their successors or assigns, and their decision to expand or remodel. their structure subject to building code compliance. 3. Obligations of City. Upon recording of this document, the City shall interpret and apply the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes and U13C Section 503.1 thereof in a way which permits the existing 20 feet between all or any portion of 130 2nd Avenue South building and the existing structures at the city park to be utilized for the determination of the minimum 20-foot building separation required pursuant thereto. 4. Change in Use. The provisions of these covenants and the City's obligations is set forth in paragraph 3 above are based upon the use category specified in a building permit application submitted by the Owner on 2 /.2 3 , 1998, incorporated by this reference as My as if herein set forth. Any change in use to a use category which require greater fire protection requirements shall be considered in the same manner as an expansion or substantial remodel of the 130 2nd Avenue South Building and shall require prompt compliance with the s 98070 provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the State Building Code as the same exist or are hereafter amended. 5. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties written or oral, and any prior understanding shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This agreement shall not be amended except in writing upon the express written consent of the parties. 6. Covenants Run with the i_.and. The covenants set forth in this agreement shall be deemed to run with and bind the tract set forth on Exhibit A and its future owners, successors and assigns as the Servient Estate and shall benefit the City as the Owners of the tract described on Exhibit B as the benefitted estate. It shall be enforceable at law or in equity by specific performance, at the City's option. 7. Venue Jurisdiction and Legal Relations. Venue for the interpretation and enforcement of this document shall be Snohomish County, Washington. The agreement shall be applied and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event of a suit to enforce its provisions, whether at law or equity, the prevailing party shall be entitled to the costs of litigation and its reasonable attorneys' fees. DONE this 2 4 day of June , 1998. OWNERS: WIGGINS PROPERTIES, LLC yh", .� 'Karen M. Wiggins, VickV President ^0_ STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that , I know or have satisfactory evidence that '?! ,re n m . \/()' _ is the person who appeared before me, and said person ackno ged that he/s , autho ' d to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as P�{' of C 'c. LLQ— to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for th es and p rposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED: Lo I A4 ( qS NOTARY PUBLIC ARY � (Print Name) My appointment expires:` f I I 9op <, CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor Barbara Fahey Sandy Chase, City Clerk Approved as to form: W. Scott Snyder(TV City Attorney W SS t 98944. r sX/F0006.90000B0006. it 98070 V 9 960?0100� q 07/01/98 10;79 P-0004 Recorded Snohomish County CITY CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS 121 M AVENUE NO. EDMONDS, WA 98020 ST9F�F��F COVENANT TO NOTIFY AND COVENANT OF RESTRICTION WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner(s) is an applicant for a building permit for property located at 130 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington; and WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building Code adopted as the State Building Code requires that certain occupancy type building openings must be protected if within ten feet of a property line and must be one hour rated or for V-N and V-1 one hour construction when located within 20 feet of the property line; and WHEREAS, UBC Section 503.1 states in part, "For the purposes of this section, the center line of the joining public way shall be considered an adjacent property line"; and WHEREAS, if the center line of the alley adjacent to 130 2nd Avenue South were utilized to determine the setback, an 8-foot setback would be created and all openings on the west side of the 130 2nd Avenue South building would be required to be protected; and WHEREAS, the subject site and alley are adjacent to a city park and the applicant has requested that the city utilize both the full width of the alley and a portion of the park property in order to determine the application of Chapter 10's requirements; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to permit such utilization if, but only if, future owners of the property are notified by covenant recorded in the land records of Snohomish County of restrictions on the use of the site and the Owners of the property on behalf of themselves, successors and assigns agree to come into prompt compliance with the then applicable provisions of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes if the city sells. the property, redevelops it in a way which eliminates all or a part of the 20-foot required minimum distance between buildings or in the event of an expansion or change in use of the 130 2nd Avenue South building, Now, Therefore The owners of certain real property described herein in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as if set forth herein and located at 130 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "Owners") and the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") have entered into this agreement under the terms and conditions set forth herein and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived: 1. Covenant to Notify. The Owners on behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, promise to notify all future purchasers of the property of the existence of these covenants and to record this agreement, at their expense, in the land records of Snohomish County. This agreement shall not be binding upon the City until these covenants are recorded. In the event the Owners fail to record, the City may require immediate compliance with the full requirements of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes as then applicable including application of the provisions of UBC Section 503.1 and Chapter 10 requiring building openings to be appropriately protected and fine construction ratings in accordance with the terms of these codes. 2. Covenant to Comply. The Owners on behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, agree that in the event any of the contingencies listed hereafter occur, the property shall be brought into prompt compliance with the then current requirements of the Uniform Building Code adopted as the State Building Code and as amended by the City of Edmonds, including, but not limited to, any requirement for the protection of windows or the alteration of the construction ratings in order to achieve full compliance with the provisions of the codes. This requirement to come into compliance may be triggered by any of the following circumstances: 2.1 The City sells all or any part of the property currently utilized as a city park and legally described on the attached Exhibit B, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth (hereinafter "city park"). In the event of a sale of a portion of the property, this covenant shall be triggered if, but only if, the portion sold, or any portion thereof, lies within the area utilized for the required 20-foot building separation under this agreement. 2.2 The city park is redeveloped in a way which utilizes all or any portion of the 20-foot minimum distance between buildings thereby requiring protection of building openings or a change in construction to meet required fire ratings. 2.3 Any future expansion or substantial remodeling of the building located at 130 2nd Avenue South (" 130 2nd Avenue South Building"). Substantial remodeling shall mean remodeling of the building at a cost equal to 30 % or more of its fair market value at the date of submission of the building permit application. 2.4 Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the legislative discretion of the Edmonds City Council to sell all or a portion of the city park described in Exhibit B or to develop the park in any way which it deems consistent with the public interest of the citizens of the City of Edmonds. Similarly, nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the discretion of the owners, their successors or assigns, and their decision to expand or remodel their structure subject to building code compliance. 3. Obligations of City. Upon recording of this document, the City shall interpret and apply the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building and State Building Codes and UBC Section 503.1 thereof in a way which permits the existing 20 feet between all or any portion of 130 2nd Avenue South building and the existing structures at the city park to be utilized for the determination of the minimum 20-foot building separation required pursuant thereto. 4. Change in Use. The provisions of these covenants and the City's obligations is set forth in paragraph 3 above are based upon the use category specified in a building permit application submitted by the Owner on 2123 , 1998, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Any change in use to a use category which require greater fire protection requirements shall be considered in the same manner as an expansion or substantial remodel of the 130 2nd Avenue South Building and shall require prompt compliance with the 98070-10019 provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the State Building Code as the same exist or are hereafter amended. 5. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties written or oral, and any prior understanding shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This agreement shall not be amended except in writing upon the express written consent of the parties. 6. - Covenants Run with the Land. The covenants set forth in this agreement shall be deemed to run with and bind the tract- set forth on Exhibit A and its future owners, successors and assigns as the Servient Estate and shall benefit the City as the Owners of the tract described on Exhibit B as the benefitted estate. It shall be enforceable at law or in equity by specific performance, at the City's option. 7. Venue. Jurisdiction and Legal Relations. Venue for the interpretation and enforcement of this document shall be Snohomish County, Washington. The agreement shall be applied and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event of a suit to enforce its provisions, whether at law or equity, the prevailing party shall be entitled to the costs of litigation and its reasonable attorneys' fees. DONE this 2 4 day of June , 1998. OWNERS: WIGGINS PROPERTIES. LLC Karen M. Wiggins, Vic)a President 9807010019 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) COUNTY OF KING ) SS. rI certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that e n 1� is the person who appeared before me, and said person ackno dged that he/sh as autho ' d to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as of LbL to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such party for th "and,oses mentioned in this instrument. DATED: Lp L Aq I q �r ' -" NOTARY PUBLIC ">A (Print Name) ..,.....' �I I�� oF' My appointment expires: CITY OF EDMONDS Mayor Barbara Fahey Sandy Chase, City'Clerk Approved as to form: — - (1) �&e . - W. Scott Snyder City Attorney W SS 198944.1 SX/F0006.90000BO006. it, c.1S90 June 1, 1998 /3oZA� Spry STREE7 FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EOMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works - Planning/Building - Parks and Recreation - Engineering - Wastewater Treatment Plant Mrs. Karen Wiggins 152 Yd Avenue South, #102A Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: 130 Second Avenue South Building The City is in receipt of your request to consider the entire width of alley (located to the west of the subject building) as the "public way" as defined in Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building Code. This request is made in order to establish the required protection of exterior wall openings in your building at 130 Second Avenue South. As you know, B occupancy type building openings must be protected within 10 feet of the property line and must be one -hour rated (for V-N and V- 1 Hour construction) when located within 20 feet of the property line. However, when buildings are constructed to a property line that is adjacent to a public way, UBC Section 503.1 states, "For the purpose of this section, the renter line of an adjoining public wav shall be considered an adjacent property line." The center line of the alley would only provide you with an eight foot setback from this assumed property line and thus openings would have to be protected on the west facade of your building. If the entire adjacent park is considered to be the "public way" and the City park and subject property are considered to be under the same "ownership" the assumed property line rule would still apply, but only a minimum of 20 feet would be required between the buildings to avoid opening protection for both buildings. ,The east face of the City restroom facility in the adjacent .City park is 29'9" inches from the west face of your building meeting the minimum required 20, foot distance for unprotected openings. The City is willing to consider the alley and the entire adjacent City park as the "public way" for determination of opening protection for your building with the condition that a covenant be executed that runs with the land that informs future owners of this agreement. Please be advised if in the future the City sells this property or re -develops it whereby negating the 20 foot minimum distance between buildings, this agreement shall become null and void and all existing openings on the west facade of your building would have to be protected to meet the current opening protection code(s). The covenant shall only apply to the existing building and shall not apply to future projects. Any future expansion or change of this building shall also initiate a re -review of this agreement. This includes a change of use initiated by you, a tenant or a new owner. Any change of use within any category of occupancy group as defined by the Uniform Building Code, shall require a re -review of the opening protection based on the proposed occupancy type. • lnr.nrooroted Auqust 11. 1890 0 Mrs. Wiggins Page Two June 1, 1998 The plans on file must.be revised by the architect of record to show the existing City alley, entire park and assumed property line between buildings. The City Attorney shall draft the required covenant that restricts use on both properties and a copy will be forwarded to you for review. Note, this document must be submitted to the City with recording fees and shall be sent to the County Auditor for recording. A reduced site plan showing the properties involved and assumed property line and building locations must also be submitted for recording with the covenant. Final approval of this proposal shall not be granted until the covenant. is submitted and plans on file with the City are revised and approved. Sincerely, Paul Mar Community Services Director Cc: , Jeannine Graf, Building Official Arvilla Ohlde, Parks & Recreation Director Scott Snyder, City Attorney MEMO TO: Paul Mar, Community Services Director Arvilla Ohlde, Parks Director FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Building Officiaoq J DATE: May 28, 1998 RE: Use of City Park West of James Street Wiggins Building @ 130 2nd Avenue South The City has received a request from Karen Wiggins, that the subject park be considered a "public way" as defined by the Uniform Building Code for protection of exterior building walls due to proximity to the property line. The Building Code regulates the fire rating of all exterior walls by establishing a distance from property lines that walls must be protected and openings such as doors or windows be fire rated. There is an existing 16 foot alley between the park and the Wiggins building but 20 feet minimum; is required for each building to have unprotected openings. The proposal is to call the entire park a "public way" which will eliminate the protection requirement of all windows on the west side of her building. A similar request was submitted for the Waterfront building at 144 Railroad Avenue that was approved by the Director (although this involved an easement on park property --the entire park was not encumbered). The negative impacts to the City could be: • Encumbering City property if we ever intend to sell or use it in a different manner • Tracking the Wiggins building and park property forever by current and future staff • Enforcing the code if in the future the openings must be fire rated due to a change on either property • Dealing with a new owner who has no knowledge of this agreement • The entire park is considered to be encumbered I am always reluctant to restrict the use of public property, and also to require that future staff monitor private property for eternity to be assured that agreements of this kind are not breached. Also, this will definitely create a precedent. However, if you two directors agree to this proposal I will make all the necessary plan notations and copies to the file for future staff information. I will also confer with the City Attorney and request he draft a covenant to be executed against both properties that notifies future owners of this agreement, requirement and encumbrance upon the land. Note, the covenant will include the proviso that future development of either property would negate the unprotected opening requirement for existing buildings on both properties. I concur the City park at James and the Ferry Holding Lanes may be considered a public way as defined in Section 503.1 the Uniform Building Code thereby allowing the Wiggins building at 130 2nd Avenue South to have unprotected openings on the west facade. Paul Mar, Community Services Director Arvilla Ohlde, Parks Director 0010 ,gy,�mm i CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY t 'as 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant Inc.189� January 28, 1998 Mr. David B. Maul, AIA 19336 47th Avenue Northeast Seattle, Washington 98155 RE: 130 Second Avenue South Building The City is in receipt of your request to consider the entire width of alley (located to the west of the subject building) as the public way as defined in Chapter 10 of the Uniform Building Code --in order to establish the required protection of exterior wall openings. As you are aware, for B occupancy buildings, openings must be protected within 10 feet of the property line and must be one -hour rated (for V-N and V-1 Hour construction) when located within 20 feet of the property line. However, when buildings are constructed to the property line, adjacent to public ways, UBC Section 503.1 states, "For the purpose of this section, the center line of an adjoining public way shall be considered an adjacent property line." I have made a site inspection and it appears that the City restroom facility in the adjacent park was deliberately setback from the center line of the alley to avoid protection of openings. Also, UBC 503.3 requires that even buildings on the same property must assume to have a property line between them in order to ascertain required wall and opening protection. Therefore, the request to. consider the entire width of the City alley as a public way in order for the west openings on the building at 130 2nd Avenue South to be unprotected, cannot be approved. Note, even if the City park and the subject property were under the same ownership the assumed property line rule would still apply and a minimum of 20 feet would be required between the buildings to avoid opening protection for both buildings. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official cc: Karen M. Wiggins, VP • Incorporated August 11, 1890 e Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan January 23, 1998 City of Edmonds Community Services Department Building Division 250 - 5' Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Jeannine Graf. RE: Sound View Plaza Building - 97372 Jack Wiggins Construction Co., Inc. Owner Dear Jeannine: We would like to install non -rated windows in the west wall of the building adjacent to the alley. Section 104.2.8 of the 1994 UBC allows for alternate materials, design and methods of construction if for the purpose intended is at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the code. The code requires that the windows for this project be protected less than 10' from the property line. Section 503.1 of the UBC provides that for the purposes of this. section the centerline of a public way is used as the property line. The alley is 16' wide therefore we are 8' of the required 10' for determining the opening protection requirement. The City of Seattle has amended this section of the code to allow the opposite side of a public way to be used as the property line for determining the protection of openings. Please see the attached copy of this section of the Seattle UBC. In addition; the property across the alley is a public park and should be considered in 'addition to the alley as part of the public way. The park is providing increased open space, which is providing considerably more separationthan the 10' required by section 503 of the UBC. The circumstances of this situation provides at least the .equivalent and I believe better separation for the openings as required by.the UBC. Please call if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you. Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S. Inc. ZD--J S David B. Maul, AIA Vice President Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S. Inc. - 19336 47th Ave. N.E. Seattle, WA 98155 (206) 440-0330 FAX 362-4381 When fire protection facilities are to be in talled by the developer such facilities including all surface access roads. shall be installed and made serviceably prior to and maintained during the time of construction. 503.2 Fire Resistance of Walls. 503.2.1 General. Exterior walls shall have fire resistance and opening protection as set forth in Table 5-A and in accordance with such additional provisions as are set forth in Chapter 6. Distance shall be measured at right angles from the property line. The above provisions shall not apply to walls at right angles to the property line. Projections beyond the exterior wall shall comply with Section 705 and shall not extend' beyond: I A point one third the distance to the property line from an assumed vertical plane located where fire -resistive protection of openings is first required due to location on property; or 2. More than 12 inches (305 mm) into areas where openings are prohibited. Interpretation I503 2b• Where Table 5 A does not include a requirement for protected open Ines. Item l above shall be a point one -third -the distance to the propeM line from an assumed vertical plane located where openings are firsipmbibited. 503.2.2 Area of openings. When openings in exterior walls are required to be protected due to distance from property line, the sum of the area of such openings'shall not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the wall in each story. 5033 Buildings on Same Property and Buildings Containing Courts. For the purposes of determining the required wall and opening protection and roof -covering requirements, build- ings on the same property and court walls of buildings over one story in height shall be as- sumed to have a property line between them. EXCEPTION: In court walls where opening protection is required such protection may be omitted, ` provided (1) not more than two levels open into the court, (2) the aggregate area of the building including the court is within the allowable area and (3) the building is not classified as a Group 1 Occupancy. When a new building is to be erected on the same property as an existing building, the location of the assumed property line with relation to the existing building shall be such that the exterior.wall and opening protection of the existing building meet the criteria as set forth in Table 5-A and Chapter 6. EXCEPTION: Two or more buildings on the same property may be considered as portions of one building if the aggregate area of such buildings is within the limits specified in Section 504 for a single building. 1-845 January 23, 1998 City. of Edmonds Community Services Department . Building Division 250 - 5" Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Jeannine .Graf RE: Sound View Plaza Building - 97372 Jack Wiggins Construction Co., Inc..Owner Dear Jeannine: We Would like to install non -rated windows in the west wall of the building adjacent to the alley. Section 104.2.8 of the 1994. UBC allows for alternate materials, design and methods of construction if for the purpose intended is at least the equivalent of that prescribed in the code. The code requires that the windows for this project :be protected less than 10' from the property line. Section 503.1 of the UBC provides that for the purposes of this section the centerline of a public way is used as the property line. The alley is 16' wide therefore we are 8' of.the required 10' for determining the opening protection requirement. The City of Seattle has amended this section of the code to allow the opposite side of a public way to be used as the property line for determining the protection of openings. Please see the attached copy of this section of the Seattle UBC. . In addition, the property across the alley is'a public park and should be considered in addition to the alley as part of the public way. The park is providing increased open space, which is providing considerably more separation than the 10' required by section 503 of the UBC. The circumstances of this situation provides at least the equivalent and I believe better separation for the .openings as required by the UBC. Please call if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you: Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S. Inc. ZD __J F, vv� David B. Maul, AIA Vice President. Rutledge Maul Architects, P.S. Inc. 19336 47th Ave. N.E. Seattle,.WA 98155 (206) 440-0330 FAX 362-4381 .. I"4 SEAT1•LE BUILDING, CODE .. 5023.E-5033 that Thirty-fifth Avenue Southwest shall control the series south of Southwest Holden Street East of California Avenue Southwest. commencing with 4200 and continuing eastward in correspondence with the numbers of the intersecting avenues to the Duwamish Waterway - provided that Thirty-fifth Avenue Southwest shall be taken as the controlling series south of Southwest Holden Street .: SECTION,503 -- LOCATION ON PROPERTY $03.1 General. Buildings shall adjoin or have access to a public way or yard on�nottsthan one side. Required yards shall be permanently maintained..., , For the purpose of this section, the ((seater -lies)) opposite side of an adjoining public way shall be considered an adjacent property line. (See also Section.1203.4 and see Section 503.4.5 I for Group H Occupancies:: See Section 1204 for location of eaves.) . Access driveways shall have a vertu clearance of not less than 14 feet (4 62 7 mm) abov thS,-___-1 g@pp may appf8 etra =ate means of access for fire protection r 'When fire protection facilities are to be installed by the developer, such ,ft-01, sur ce acrpss roads shall be insilled and made QN:LX ceablegrior to and maintained during lue time of construction. 503.2 Fire Resistance of Walls. 5031.1 General. Exterior walls shall have fire resistance and opening protection as set forth in Table: 5-A and in accordancewithsuch additional provisions as are set forth in Chapter 6. Distance shall be measured at right angles from the property line. The above provisions shall not apply.to walls at right angles to the property line. Projections beyond the exterior: wall shall comply withSection 705 and shall not extend I beyond: 1 A point one third the distance to the property line from an assumed vertical plane located where fire -resistive protection of openings is fast required due to location on property; or 2. More than 12 inches (305 min) into areas where openings are prohibited. Interpretation I503.2b: ' Where Table 5-A does not include a mQuirement for protected ey��- ings_. Item' 1 above shall be a point one-third the distance to the propel line from an assumed vertical plane located where openings are first prohibited• 5031.2 Area of openings. When. openings in exterior walls are required to be protected due to distance from property line, the sum of the area of such openings'shall not exceed 50 percent of the total area of the wall in each story 5033 Buildings on Same Property and. Buildings Containing Courts. For the purposes. of determining the required wall and opening protection and roof -covering requirements, build- ings on the same property and court walls of buildings over one story in height shall be as- sumed to have a property line. between them. - EXCEPTION: in court walls where opening protection is required such protection may be omitted, provided (1) not more than two levels open into the court, (2) the aggregate area of the building including the court is within the allowable area and (3) the' building is not classified as a Group I Occupancy. When a new. building is to be erected on the same property as an existing building, the location of the assumed property line with relation to the existing building shall be such that the exterior wall and opening protection of the existing building, meet the criteria as set forth in Table 5-A and Chapter 6.' ` EXCEPTION: Two or more buildings on she same property may be considered as portions of one building if the aggregate area of such buildings is within the limits specified in Section 504 for a single building . 1-845 Amenities Design Board - January 6, 1975 - Page 4 ADB-72-74 Arne G. Goedecke (continued) There was general discussion of the dwelling units planned for the site with. Mr. Westlin showing examples of dwelling units that would be suitable for the site. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MRS. BERNHOFT-TO ACCEPT ADB-72-74 AS. SUBMITTED. SECONDED BY MR. GOLDSMITH. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADB-20-7 Alaska N.W. Publishin Co 130 Second Avenue South - Review of amended caring on 12-2-74 (BC) Mr. Chet Bennett, representing Alaska Publishing and Mr. Pickle, stated that a meeting had been held with Mr. Henning,Mr. Wallis, Mr. Whitcutt:, fir. Pickle and himself and that they, had pretty. well worked out what was necessary for them to comply. Mr. Bennett presented plans that were concluded at that meeting: He pointed out the landscaping proposed and location of the 'ionterey Cypress. He also reviewed the plans for the mansaard roof indicating that it would be cut off at the end of the new bui-lding,as originally submitted. 'The. only other change has to do with the stone facia. The stone would-be carried across the new building up to the window sill height of the existing building. There was some discussion concerning the applicant postinq a bond for the remainder of the project. Mr. Whitcutt stated that the Building Department ,c holds a bond of $2,500 at this time that could include the landscaping requi rement. After considerable discussion, F1R. WESTLIN MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MODIFIED, AMENDED PLANS FOR ALASKA PUBLISHING, CO. ADB-20-74, SUBMITTED BY MR. BENNETT AND SIGNED BY MR. HUGH PICKLE, MR. HENNING'S REPRESENTATIVE, SAID PLANS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE?iENTS: 1. Return the facia 8 feet along south side of the addition beginning at the face of the vest facia. 2. Accept the metal siding there now. 3. Accept the landscaping as amended indicating the correct terminology. 4. Accept the landscaping of the freeform as submitted on the amended plans. 5. Extend the stone facia on the east,side to the height of the windo,:: sill of the east side of the existing building. 6. Require that the bonding presently held by the Building Department apply to the landscaping. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ADB-1-75 Massie Construction - Duplex at 206th & 77th S.W. (Arne Goedecke-Developer) ADB-2-75 Massie Construction.- Duplex at 7615.7616-206th S.W. (Arne Goedecke-Developer) Mr. Wallis presented the above applications to the Board stating they had been submitted this date and the applicant asked to be present to request that they be heard. Mr. Goedecke stated he recently acquired the L.E. 'Jess Addition at 206th & 77th S.W. and was not aware that the plans for a duplex required review by the ADB. Mr. Goedecke asked for approval of the plans subject to final approval of landscaping and exterior design so that he .could obtain building permits to proceed as soon.as possible. 114r. Wallis suggested that.aporoval could perhaps be given for the site and circulation plan and a foundation permit could be issued at this time. Mr. Whitcutt said he could not issue a building permit until plans had been approved by the Amenities Design Board. 974 Pa • ACC or. ' ?} �/ •.=001:r - Review of off-street parking for professional offices at -- — b; � EC�.wrds Ic .V•� 2r,,� � Hr. :,;allis pr s need plans su:;,,itted by Dr. Ho,)ver statirg that Dr. Hoover }' ?.en in consultation on a parkin^ crnf,-uration. N �r. Wallis stated tn:,t the bUi'.•], lc is an existir; reSidenJi 6 type structure on Edmonds r}jy and that prr):,seu parking develo:niv-nt Yeas cone recognizing the awk'.vzrd angle. htr. „ii't U� S4. t'at in lookirc at �he pl a., th,2re did nrt ap�e-tr -o be adequate room for an inside urr.around. i'r. ldall.is stated that the t•ro part nc spaces to tha back would be .fcr staff �..ri:i nn only. There was discussion of landscaping with Dr. Hoover stating. that he had been to a nursery i or rncom,mendat ions for planting. pie pointed ye! t theter.: sti rg 6 ;cnt.fency -nd the locatio, of the fenc:- he must ins`iail that abutts resi'ential zr)ning. Ile pointed out the exiting shrubs and his plans for additional landscaping. Thare was further discussion of the parking Plan with Mr. 4tijitcutt pointing out that the parking lot plan had not beer, r�.vie'rled by staff. There was discussion of Zhu amount of room allowed for ingress and egress. Mr. lfestlin poi:,`: d out that the blacktop gees to the edge of the fence and some lantir}r shoulc;,be considdred along that area. Mr. Goldsmith recomm-n ded that a complete. landscape plan be submitted showing location, size and type of shrubs and plants to be moved or installed. Mr. IJhitcutt suggested that the parking plan and. landscape plan be su.ij�itted togethar. Dr. Hoover said he was not aware that he needed a plan in such detail. It was pointed out that a documented landscape and parking plan.v:as required for administrative purposes to insure conformity to what the Board approves. Dr. Hoover said he was very anxious to have the parking plan approved as he plats to move into the buildin by the first of the year. Mr. Whitcutt said that an approved parking plan irust be on file ino,der to proceed with the parking lot paving. •The existing plan submitted does not indicate scale or lot size. Mr. Westlin stated that he would b, reluctant to make any decision or give preliminary approval until adequate information. is submitted with regard to proposed parking. Dr. Hoover said he would then have to park along Edmonds Way until the. parking is approved. As an alternative he said he could also park in the front yard area Dr. Hoover stated he mould plan to move into his building by the first of the year and use an alternative plan by parking along Edmonds 4tay and in the front yard area until he can submit adequate parking and landscaping plans. He asked to be placed on the agenda of the next meetingOver . ADB- - 4 Alaska Publishing - 0,Second AVenue - Review of amended plans (BC) r. .a lis stated that he felt the board was familiar with what had transpired up to this point. He reviewed a letter from Mr: Henning that was addressed to the Board. Mr. -Hugh Pickle, attorney for Alaska Publishing introduced fir. Birch of Harbor Construction Company who prepared some of the renderings for Alaska Publishing. Mr. Pickle stated that on November 20th an amended application was filed._ He stated that the facia would remain .the.same, that is the roof trim, except it would not extent into the other building as previously proposed. Mr. Goldsmith questioned whether it was the same facia since they stated in their letter that they were substituting a better facia. Mr. Pickle stated that this is the last word. Mr. Birch said Mr. Henning had asked him to retain the same facia on the new addition on three sides and the existing building which +,!as in the initial proposal is to be removed. Mr. Pickle said there was a cost factor involved in the change on that portion of the building. Mr. Birch referred to the landscaping stating that the trees shown on tf}e rendering are centered at 7 ft. and are Monterey Cypress. At full growth they have a 6 foot spread and.at present are about 42 feet high. i A:.2n;t,es `,mrJ - , ..,_ riber ?1374 - Page 6 _I I 3 1 n_ _ 130 I s _` f i.. .. o I r' /11"� .1• .. ' ? j' _..'.'C: dt tnPy ;,:1 to r {310ng ilk p' r'7i1^ I t lr,• _,._ it3CC `,. " .`! :icy .''0� fit T_ile .'r'�f .. .. fan 11,'2re via-, �1 :J1:... -Ji7 w�i,l��i .,.1 .:IP nU� .�'..il.,,:1 _ Z,� s+_A 1 'g 'Lila= tri_..=,� ar,P ears CU 1.,e soil?'_.J'.i.:!! ri,a l�jet;J n ;ice (jr?'al :S s' :r., c`:J D> 2J. ;f� r`.-::. ,...'i nd. t. %ai:' sit0i 4 ^�'rarea ;r. Cdlifor'ni9. ti sa i + +,e a d he 5fi ;i Ltie,/ .111aM +'.:') s,jc? tC j0! g We': 1. 1 .. r2c'.Is Iio r°rtI -,ii1! ..fca ';10'�t . _ _:'i t;i0 %;c. fCY ....�'=i.in�5 v2."'' sale Nr. "ii-t r:.';i'tii tha Si 0f '.lask) t:"-;b11-1 ';1na a l .. 1. + t: a poor' choice. ria sai-d hz. Lli_d fifso airitll2!' 1 n in :r_a w:10 '-no-as ?' �la_al ii)[,'_it 'r?s:i. ~r.l �iCri;C1!, c' ?' 11: `n h3?•r I .j1, . t 521� iia 11gCi ')..=:i J'l�t t}iti: .;.%.C�, 'i; !)r, tile: ..� ;c.Ci�:a. .. 1�:'t. ., � 11ur_T?ry said t,'- 1133 riot sfr r. ?i'/ In tfi;., and thlil., G ''lip;:.... .)Cilll� kill teem. ! oIdsriith also ra ad fr.)!;:t a astern .9 gook .1;,'ch also indicz+ed th2 'Gt' iprri C-1 rota cost P _'s therr.?^)s. ._..;1riUl' tql^ this Type tree. ,%1 r. Goldsrit.n ::ien 0c.-ved ? rendering (jo^e by his %, ire that shows 1in;,r the landscaoiny would look with the building. :r. Coidsml ^c�4red outL flat ii the -rta 1is constrl+ct2 rs sbC''i" on ti drawing one :iobld not be able to see th.. ;,raps when planted beyond. r;lso . the amount of ber'": Tar exceeds the vol;:;.;_ o sail indicated! on the plan. There :'las general discussion of the various plans that had been submitted by Alaska Publishing. The Board expressed their displc'as+ire with the performance of Alaska Publishing up to this point. They 'pit Alaska Publishing had presented a nur'•:.)2r of drawings but had nct complied with 'ghat hi;d b.:�en approved by 02 Board. 11r..Gold'smith said t.ha only.tiiing they had complied with was the recorxiendatior, that the two hui1dings be adjoined rattler Ji5n free standing.lie pointed out Mat the rec.,,-, _'nded facia, siding and landscaping had not been done. i•ir'. 14estlin stated that the original proposal called for sandstone on the front and a weyhauser panel 15 on, the facia. Mr. Pickle stated that when they amended the application they asked that all stone be le't off but'as a compromise to these plans, they decided to leave the stone up to about 2 feet. Mr. Goldsmith and Mr. Westlin both stated that this was the first they had heard about leaving 2 feet of stone on. the front. There was discussion of. how that would compare with the existing-bui,lding with Mr. Pickle stating that the other building was built some tir:,e ago and.has stone all the way up the side: There was general discussion of what has actaully been done with the building and what tie Board felt they had approved. There was discussion of the type of siding used with'the Board stating they had approved .a wood siding but there was metal there, now.. Mr. Goldsmith stated that it was his opinion that all at.had been provided th was pretty pictures and a lot of talk. Mr. Pickle said he felt they had done wliat was necessary and as. far as the discrepancy in the number of traes, that 'could be changed. Mr. Birch said they would welcome recommendations for landscaping. THERE WAS A MOTION MADE TO CONTI1NUE THIS ITEM TO THE iIEXT 11EETING TO ALLOW REVIEW BY THE FULL BOARD. 110TION SECONDED AND CARRIED. . ADB-72-74 Presentation by Arnie Goedecke for proposed PP,D - Preliminary Review 68th Ave.W. at Norl;h Meadoadale Beach Road. Arnie Goedecke made an informal,informational presentation of a proposed PRD west of 60th.Ave. W. at North Meadovidale Beach Road. The formal application will be presented in the future. Meeting Adjourned. Edm a 3f Adjustment -October 23,_ 10 CU-33-74 Elizabeth Matha.y, 3006-240th S.I•,., Conditional Use Permit for home occupation for production of candles and crafts (RS3) Mr. Wallis reviewed the criteria for a home occupation and the request appears to conform with all respects and approval is recommended. Mrs. Mathay stated that she is making candies and war, figures for sale but would not be having people coming to the bouse. MOTION MADE AND SECONDED THAT CU-33-74 BE APPROVED SINCE IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF A CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT AND IS NOT DETRIiMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. "MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CU•39-74 Craig. P. Kary, 743 Casper St. Conditional Use Permit for operation of lawn service.(home occupation) (RS-12) Mr. !}Wallis stated that he had talked to iir. Kary avid that he received a copy of the criteria for a home occupation. He said Mr. Kary.was using his home as a telephone contact so that he can do yard lvor•k and that it meets all the conditions for a conditional use permit. There being no questions or comments,. ^, INOTION WAS i'4ADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE CU-39-74 SINCE IT DOES NOT EIiD,4:IGER THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE AND MEETS ALL THE REQUIRED CONDITIONIS AND SPECIi=ICATIONS SET FORTH IN THE ZONE WHERE IT PROPOSES TO LOCATE AND MEETS CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREPi'-NTS.' MOTION CARRIED. CU -74 Alaska Publishing - 1 1 Second Avenue, Conditional Use Permit for manufacturing - fiberglass boa accordance with Sec. 12.13.190, not to exceed three years. Mr. Wallis stated that in a BC zone under Sec. 12.13.190 permitted uses, fabrication and sale of metal, wood, plastics or similar products of light industry, subject a conditional use permit grant provided there shall be no outside storage of any material, is allowed. Mr.. Wallis reviewed the criteria required for the conditional use permit stati.ng there, is similar activity being conducted in the same block. Mr. Wallis stated that with relation to stipulation of exact location as a means of minimizing hazards, the dispersal of fumes from the fiberglass operation should he a requirement. iir. Wallis recommended approval. Mr. Cook, 151 5th S. representing Alaska Publishing stated that he had noticing to add and that they would comply with all requirements. Chairman Allen asked what method would be used for dispersal of fumes. Mr. Cook stated that it would be a hand laying method and there would be no spraying. lie stated that this is a pilot project and they would be building a limited number of river boats to be used in Alaska. He stated they .would have some acetone in the building and that he had already been to the Fire Department and were issued a permit. Mr. Cook said that nothing will be stored outside. There was general discussion of exhausting fumes. Mr. Cook stated that the fumes disperse rapidly and are not harmful. A MOTION WAS MADE AND SECONDED TO APPROVE CU-40-74 SINCE IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA IN WHICH IT IS LOCATED AND WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE AidD MEETS THE REQUIRE;ENTS OF A CONDITIONAL USE. A MOTION WAS MADE TO ADJOURN THE MEETING at 12:05 a..m°.. imemTies ues-ign r>oard - ucteber 23, 1974 - Pa;e 4 A03-6 .pliable Flo.rr Coverings, inc. existing building at 542 Main Street to use as floor covering, disp u Ws ales and distribution Center (BC) Mr. Andy Colwibro presented proposed plans to remodel the old IO•3F Lodge on _ Main Street. There was general discussion regarding the fire escape tihich Mr. Columbro explained would be placed at the rear of the building. There was also discussion of the amount of parking needed and landscaping. Mr. u Wallis stated that the parking area requires 8 landscaping. Mr. Wallis said that in sore cases do;:ntown they have asked that tie 8" landscaping be applied to other areas rather than the alley so that it can be enjoyed by people passing. He further.s.tated that landscaping is required if there are 8 spaces or more. Mr. Columbro pointed out that the building comes right to the sidewalk in the front .and there would beno room for landscaping. . There was further discussion -of placing some landscaping along the west elevation. J The applicant .•,as commended on his design for remodeling the building. A MOTION WAS Ni AND SECONDED TO APPROVE AD°-62-74 UITH THE CONDITION, . THAT THE APPLICANT INSTALL SOME LANDSCAPING ALONG THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. Chairman Bernhoft stated that the next item on the agenda is the appointment of ,Don b,estlin. His appointment was forone year which expires on. November 4, 1974. She said she had ,written ,to the Mayor and requested that he be reappointed for a longer term. Mr. Westlin said he would *be happy .to serve another term. hairman Bernhoft stated that another item that she was concerned with was the follow-ups on applicants who'do not comply with conditions placed on teem by the Board. Mr. l•lallis stated that an action had taken place at the time the Planning Commission and the Amenities Design Board had their joint meeting. fir. Wallis stated that the Building Department had been following up very consistently on the stipulations added by the Board. He said they had already written a letter to -Alaska Publishing informing them that they had not complied with the stipulations set by the Board. Furthermore, the Building Department has given a copy of the letter to'the City Attorney in the event the applicant does not follow thru with the requirements. Mr. I;'allis said he had received a response from Alaska Publishing and had met personally with Mr. Henning. Ile said he had received a firm commitment from Mr. Henning and distributed copies of the letter to the Board members. Mr. Wallis explained that the time the original commitment was made on the Dlans that Bruce. Beard was_present and subsequent to that meeting he met with Mr. Henning and Bruce and. fir. Henning indicated that they had been responsible neighbors in the community and had done an credible job with their existing facilities and was quite adament that he had to kno;v what the costs were before some of the commitments were made. Mr. Wallis stated that he informed Mr. Henning that if we expect that from one applicant of the City we have to expect it from everyone. Mr. Wallis stated that any subsequent amendment that might be made in the interest of cost or any other item would be considered. Mr. Goldsmith expressed his displeasure.with the manner in which this project has been handled by Alaska Publishing. He said he felt that Mr. Henning,. before he committed himself, should' have found out what was going on, attended the meetings and have costs available. He further stated that this Board had spent several meetings on his project only to find that he I going to do it some other way, that Mr. Henning feels they are reasonable people and will accept that what was originally presented is now to costly. Mr. Goldsnith stated that if this is the tray they are going to work then he did not 'wish to see any more of their plans. There was some discussion of whether there had been a lack of communication between Alaska Publishing and the city. Mr. Wallis stated that Mr. Henning was out of town a good deal of the time when this was being discussed by the Board. It was pointed out by one of the Board members that the fact remains that they had built the exact same building they had first brought ;:core the Board that was rejected twice: f°1r. Latourell said he concurred with Mr. Goldsmi0 , that the .problem that Nir. Henning is facing now he has generated himself. ;ir. Latourell said he did not feel the Board had been unreasonable at all with their dealing with his designated representative. He'said that if his representative has placed him in a position of dire financial problems h P ms t ats something o ' P g for him to work out with his representative.. Amenities Design Board - October 23, 1974 = Page r • DiscussilAAlaska Publishing (continued) Chairman Bernhoft also expressed concern that follow up had not ew. done as recoriiliendle!: by the Board at an earlier meeting. IV- Wallis 2xpiained that ire talked to t°le 31ai Official after that meeting and he had already co;-:muni cated ti-, i ti the applicant i nfor;ni n• them that they had not conformedwith the Board directives,. and therefore did riot 4;ritr. Lfl additional letter. .11r. Wallis said the letter fie distributed cane -in to hi::i today and ii° ;could folio;•r what ever instructions the Board so desired. The Board reviewed the dra;;ings provided by Alaska Publishing noting that they did not correspond with what :;as previously approved nor,. do they corresoorid !-pith what is actually a h ,id"+n. that has been used on the buildii; There was further discussion of e there noi�;. O and the fact that it is not -;hat was approved by the Board. The Board directed 'fir. Wallis to convey to the Building Official, their feelings that the applicant has not complied with their original coni.mitment and it is, the expectation of file Board that they will. Mr. Goldsmith suggested that if. they wished to niake a change to their plans that they nake an application for an ariendr-nt with specific inforrcation as to exactly what they are going. to do, but that they should not be able to occupy a building they wanted to build in the first place, without doing any of the things they v;ere committed to. There was general discussion regarding the suggestion with the feeling of the Board that they would be starting the complete process over again. There was also discussion of approval of the plans and the recommendation that theplans approved by the amenities Design Board be stamped and any special conditions noted on the plans before they are given to the Building Department. Mr. Wallis stated that he would like Chairman Bernhoft to review a draft of the letter to be sent to Alaska Publishing to make certain it covers all they r,;ish to convey. Mr. Goldsmith said he would also like to review the letter. There was further discussion of plans reviewed by the Board and Mr. Wallis stated that there have been instances when the applicant picked up his plains after review by the Board. Ile recom.inended that a regulation be established thd-t one set of plans are to be submitted and retained by the City. There was discussion of the application of Dr. Suchert at five corners and the fact that the conditions of the approval had not yet been met. Mr. Wallis.said he would creek on the status of that project. There was discussion of signs and the type of signs that mould be desirable for the Edmonds area and what could be done to direct people to desirable or a particular type of signing. Mr. Wallis suggested that perhaps there could be a moratorium on signs for a couple of months while a sign ordinance is established along with design districts. This would relieve the Board of administrative routine as far as signing is concerned. lie said he .would haye.to check with John Wallace to see what legal problems might arise. from such a moratorium. It was 'the general consensus of the Board that a good rough draft of a sign`ordinance should. be ready before discussion of a moratorium. There was discussion of the things that should be contained in a sign ordinance,that might help remedy the situation along 99 High lay. There was discussion of the number of cases that had been heard before the Amenities.Design � Board and it was suggested that a report should be made to the Council to inform them of the number and type of applications heard by the Board. Mr. 'Wallis said he would draft a letter and summarize the applications that had been before the Board. He said he would also send copies of all agendas to the Board members for their review. Mr..Goldsmith commended the City of Edmonds on its improvement of Olympic View Drive and also stated that he did not see how Park View Firs fence could possibly bother anyone in the City of Edmonds. There was general discussion of fences in the setback areas with relation to privacy and safety. j Meeting adjourned. { TO FORM 41 - LITTLE'S �--ATER-OFFICE COMMUNIOL..,MONS DATE September 24 i g 74 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FROM BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Permit #740277 - Alaska Northwest Publishing 1414Dayton Street j A final inspection will be made on the above building in the near future. Please indicate to this department any corrections, if needed, in regard to the Engineering requirements. t Perr er�� AAl" Pis, tusre�l • i AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD MAY 22, 1974 The regular meeting of the Amenities Design Board was called to order by Chairman Bernhoft. Chairman Bernhoft •,,elcomed the audience and explained the procedures and intent of the Board, asking that people with requests have good documentation of their request so that the Board can act effectively. ROLL CALL PRESENT Margaret Bernhoft John Latourell Keith Goldsmith CENDA ITEMS ADB-20-7� Alaska Publishing - inal Landscape Review - 130 - 2nd Avenue r Mr. Wallis presented slides of the existing building and parking area stating that Alaska Publishing had submitted plans providing additional landscape information. The. Board reviewed the landscape plans with !,Ir. Goldsmith statin that he did not feel the plans were adequate; that landscaping was skimpy. There was discussion regarding landscaping of .the parking lot area with Mr. Walli"s.stating t_zat it i� an existing parking lot and there is some question as to whether regulations can be enforced in this particular case as to the 8 landscaping requirement. John i�-lallace, City Attorney, stated that if it ties in with the design. criteria, G. the 8/,, requirement can be enforced. There was further dis- cussion regarding the parking lot and landscaping of that t4 area with "ir. Goldsmith stating that if they were going to continue to use the parking lot that he felt it should be STAFF E. Joseph Wallis, City Planner landscaped. *i1'.. GOLDSMITH MADE. A MOTI011: TO RETURN THE PLANS TO ALASNA . FUBLISHING FOR REVIEW AND UPGRADING OF PLANT SIZE AND FOR PLANS TO LANDSCAPE THE PARKING LOT AT LEAST ON THE SEUV..4? AVENUE SIDE. THE.�?OTIOII NIAS SECONDED BY MR. LATOUP.ELL. MOTION CARRIED. 211-27-74 Project `lananement Associates - "Park View Firs" Fina Landscape RReview. Mr. Wallis showed slides, stating that this application had been submitted some time back and was approved subject to final landscape review. Chairman Bernhoft requested that this item be deferred until a little later in the evening until the Board had time to look their new plan over. Item continued. ADB-22-74 Olympic Properties - 23108-110th West - Sign for Real Estate Of :icf e. Mr. Wallis stated that Olympic Properties had been before the Board in March and had been asked to come back with a more suitable si-n for the area. Mr. Wallis read from a letter submitted by Mr. Wayne Meyers of. Olympic Properties. in which they propose to amend their application by usir.;. a low profile sandblasted sign. They.also requested, as a part of this application, approval from the Board to move t'_.e pole si-n at 22919-100th West to the nell location, at ENGI14EERING REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND APARTME14T BUILDING PROJECTS Name ALASKA PUBLISHING CO. Addition Date May, 7, 1974 STREETS AND ACCESS 1. Right -of -Way Requirements None 2. Road Bed Width: None 3. Turn Around: None 4. Sidewalks: None 5. Parking Strip: None 6. Access Easements: None UTILITIES 1. Water Mains: 8-inch existing . 2. Fire Hydrants: Exi.sting 3. Sewers or Septic Tanks: Sanitary Sewer Existing �0 4. Drainage: Install all necessary storm sewers and drainage facilities per drainage plan and City Standards. Where drainage is across adjacent private property, all parties having any ownership interest in the lands being developed shall provide, as a restriction on the title running with the land, that the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless from any and all claims for damages which may be occasioned to adjacent land by reason of the construction and operation of the drainage system, unless, releases of damages and/or drainage easements are obtained from the other property owners affected by said drainage. Any drainage problems created by change of contour during development must be corrected., prior to occupancy permits or release of performance bond. Final approval (or release of bond) will be withheld until actual drainage as installed has been inspected by the City Engineer. Engineering Re Apartment Bui rements Pro! fir Comm'1 & - Page 2 • 5. Utility Easements: 6. Underground Utilities: To be provided in accordance with Ordinance No. 1387. Street lighting shall also be provided with the necessary street light standards and underground wiring. TOPOGRAPHY 1. Excavation and Grading: Excavation and grading shall conform to the requirements outlined in Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, latest adopted edition, Vol. 1. Where extensive.grading and fill are involved in the development, a grading plan and specifications shall be prepared. QUOTATION FROM THE CITY CODE REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS 11.02.025(f) Utilities and Street Improvements. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building or structure of any kind or description unless the plans and specifications include the construction for c'Urbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, necessary water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage necessitated by the new construction or improvement, to be built to applicable City standards, provided, however, if found by the City Engineer to be impractical to construct at the time of application for said building permit, construction may be waived by the City Engineer and in lieu thereof a performance bond filed with said engineer to cover the estimated cost of construction to City standards for said improvements, provided further, in areas zoned single .family residential at the time of said application for building permit in which the applicant has received final approval for a plat or sub -division and has compiled with requirements therein compliance with this subsection shall be deemed by compliance with the sub -division or plat requirements. COMMENTS Rev. April 2, 1971 a r ,r A.lenities Design Board - Regular Fleeting - February 27, 1974 - Page 3 Tie Chairman declared a 10 minute recess at 9:25 p.m. Following recess the Chairman stated that the last two items on the agenda. which would require a short time to hear, would be heard first. ADB-9-74 Walt Lester. Addition to business sign (existing sign) at 1047 Puget Drive. (BN) Mr. Wallis showed slides of the existing sign and the site. He said that fir. Lester had stated that because,of a p-evious committment he could not be at the hearing until later in the evening. fir. Wallis explained the application. The new sign will have landscaping at the base and will be in conformance to thi! BN sign regulations. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. GOLDSMITH, SECONDED BY rill. WESTLIN THAT ADB-9-74 BE APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR. Motion carried unaniiiously. �til1� ADB-8-74 Boat Loft. Inc. Boat launching facility for public launching and customers of Boat Loft. 465 Admiral Way. (CW) Mr. Wallis presented slides of the site and reviewed the application. Bill Karr, Boat Loft, Inc. was in the audience. fie explained to the Board that this was a monorail launcher with a marine fork lift to bring the boats from the loft across the street for launching. Mr. Goldsmith asked Mr. Karr if the Port of Edmonds intends to acquire the property and he said he did not know. Paul Roy, 844 Alder Street said this was greatly needed in the summer. People start lining up at 3 A.M. in order to use the one launcher that is there at the Port of Edmonds. . SECONDED BY MR. RIZZUTO THAT ADB-8-74 BE APPROVED AS APPLIED Motion Carrie lanimously. }' ADB-6-74 Alaska Publishing_ B' ding, Distribution and storage of pertinent 4 `materials used i e publishing of printed matter. 130 2nd Ave. Immedia rth of existing building formerly Crow Hardware. (BC) Mr. Wallis showed slides of the site and said this was a preliminary review.asked i for by Harbor Construction. Bruce Beard, Harbor Construction was in the audience, representinn Alaska Publish- ing. He explained that this was a temporary structure which would be a steel structure. It would have trim of sandstone material the same as the, existing build- ing. Landscaping and walkways would be installed. Mr. Beard said they do not have landscape plans at present but mould prepare them. He said this is a prgblem area as the water table is high. All structural work must be done on pilings. The building primarily will be used for assembling, binding and shipping of printed materials. Paul Cook said if the applicant wants a metal•building then they should attempt ° to screen it as much as.possible. Mr. Beard said they asked for the preliminary hearing in order to get as much input from the Board as possible for guidance as to what they wanted and would accept. Mr. Wallis said a traffic count had shown approximately 600.QQ0 cars__ a vet se- Sunset Way. He suggested that the building location be cFi`an�,4 ani� a'"be`rm in- stalled. This would soften the impact of the building. - (01 s � _ IV 0 0 Amenities Design Board - Regular !Ieeting - February 27, 1974 - Page 4 / "1r. Goldsmith said perhaps there is too much commercial zoning in downtown Edmonds. He also said he did not think the Board should prepare a plan for / an applicant. fir. Goldsmitl'said he would also like to -see the applicant make the presentation, not the contractor. Mr. Beard said the placement of'the building would not be too much trouble and could be chap led. Mr. Latourell said the huilJ.ing would need lavish landscaping and there was no indication of landscaping at this timw.. Mr. Beard said if approval depended on fully landscal:ed plan then they would submit it that way. Mr. Rizzuto said placing a metal building next to the ferry holding lanes was' the wrong use of the land. Ile said he thought other materials were more attrac- tive. He said it was his feeling that he would have to reject this application and ask Harbor Construction to return with better plans. Mr. Westlin said he did not feel there. was any relationship between this building and the existing one. He suggested they tie the two buildings together in appear- ance. Mr. Beard said they are working on a long range pr(gram for the site which would call for demolition of the existing buildings. .lim ever this plan would probably not be ready for a year and a half or two years. -hey are planning a campus: type development which would be the headquarters for Alaska Publishing. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. RIZZUTO. SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN THAT THE APPLICATION BE RE- TURNED TO THE APPLICANT FOR 110DIFICATION AND ASK FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN; LOCA- TION OF BUILDING, DETAILED LANDSCAPiN(I PLANS AND EXPLORE ARCHITECTURAL MODIFICA- TIONS OR ALTERNATIVE_ BUILDINf,S. J. Ward Phillips said the people of Edmonds are concerned about a building of this type. Warehouses are not allowed in l.his cane. lir. Phillips :ild this is a Butler Building and is still a warehouse. This is une of the najor entrances to the City and the back of this property is actually the front. Mr. Phillips said many types of buildings can be done at no more cost than metal buildings. development should be allowed in conjunction with the needs of the citizens and the intent of BC is retail oriented. C. A..flcConnachie said he felt the applicant is just trying to find out whether the City will allow a metal building. Mr. McConnachie said Butler buildings are not necessarily warehouses. Mr. Latourell said they are not prohibiting steel buildings, only trying to elimi- nitte ugly buildings. lie said they are concerned with the location, texture and shape. Mr. Goldsmith asked if the Amenities'Board is to be concerned'with long range, - plans and could the board limit the life of a temporary building. John Wallace, City Attorney said the Board does not have the poorer to limit the: life of a building. When additional structural development is proposed, then they could take a long look at the project if the building is still there. Mr. Wallis asked Mr. Beard if he had any schematic on ultimate plans and was told they have been working on plans. Mr. Wallis said he thought it would be'in older -to review them with the Amenities Oesi�n Board as this would show a cortmitt- mrnt of the owner. ON CALL FOR THE QUESTION THE MOTION CARRIED WITH MR. GOLDSMITH VOTING "NO"._ 0 • PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW ROUTING e (/� SITE ADDRESS: � Pj II��"��j�/(/�T J TYPE: BUILDING PERMIT (CHECK ONE) SIDE SEWER PERMIT SINGLE FAMILY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT �] MULTIPLE STREET USE PERMIT COMMERCIAL C� STREET TREE PERMIT FENCE r- SEPTIC TANK DESIGN PERMIT NEW METER/WATER SERVICE GRADING DEMOLITION �� E.I.S. RELOCATION ❑ OTHER: [� SUBDIVISION REVIEW PLAT/PRD REVIEW � �f DRAINAGE PLAN C�� Y L'- LTA I L IN CITY ENGINEER DRAINAGE ENGINEER WATER/SEWER DIVISION ❑ STREET DIVISION P.14. RECEPTIONIST L� WORK ORDER COORDINATOR ® UTILITY BILLING eff�MTOR/ADMINISTRATOR RECORDS (FILE). OTHER: (YIMMFMTC . OUT Reviewed By: Date Reviewed: (See Comments)=►Q 74P El El 2/3/81 0; CITY OF F-93MCJIMDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 30, 1978 Mr �-, LeRoy Middleton Reid;. Middleton and Assoc. 324 Main Street' Edmonds., Washington 98020 Dear LeRoy: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR SUBJECT: RE-ROUTING OF SANITARY SEWER,'ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING COMPANY We discussed with Virgil Bayne from Bailey's Architect Office the possibility of re-routing the present sewer main running across the subject property. The City is not opposed to the concept of re-routing the sewer with the appropriate easements, engineering plans, and inspection of the construc- tion. We indicated to Mr. Bayne, that an engineering plan should be submitted as soon as possible so that the building designs could be coordinated with the approved sanitary sewer modifications. If you need any further information, contact Richard Allen, Engineering Division, at 775-2525, ext. 220. Yours very truly, SIGNED LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works RHA:ly As t . C . E . date in . Sec . date df 7 S � November 23, 1976'. MEMO TO: HARRY b1HITCUTT BUILDING OFFICIAL. FROM: LEIF R. LARSON CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR BEARD REMODEL AT 13.1 2d Ave. S. After reviewing the subject permit, we have the following comments: 1) Coordination of location of utilities with building is the responsibility of this contractor. 2) Lot drainage to be contained on site or directed to storm sewer system: 3) Undergound wiring required per attached.Code... 4) All plumbing.to connect to sanitary sewer. 5) It is recommended that.a sidewalk and curb,per. City Code, be install.ed along the west and .south sides of this property. 14J N : m,i P EP 11 T Date LEGAL DESCRI I tn ell AeCH Ry� BUILDING PERMIT POIEW - ErinirIEEPINGWPARTNENT CHECK LIST Instruction:. Check Accuracy of Lenal nescription Check Against Assessor's Map n for Lonal. Subdi'vision Does it conform to (,.i ty, Approved Subdivision? r( Reviewer's Initials 1. This lot included in Suhdivision/ lat No... 2. Site te Inspection made on: 3. What are. around water and.soil conditions? 7 4. Site nrainane Checked? 5. Storm.Spwer. Avaflamiii—v� Roadside Ditch RIAOINK.rid—O I Sht. of f1w). No. . Tr -- 6. Giradi'99 ?4 Final Contours:. 7.: Septic Tank System Pesinn Approved: L, AL — Sanitary Sewer.Availihility Sht of �-iq. No. Proj4 ectOLO ha 1.16 Side sealer availahilitv:--��1992rffjt 9. Sanitary.Sewer Connection Fees?—Xzkf�- 107 Uater 11iiins A Fire 11wWrits {Indicate Size Pla i n) Check Fire Dept.. ' s Comments ON 11. Sidewalks:. (,Site inspection show con di'tjnn �s�Lfpwalks as f o I l.o,,-j s 12. Curbs:- es/�r v Curh Cu ivowclys (Choc- dri^veways for safety, location, grade and width, :_- 13'. Unde"round 11irino: Street Lights: 14. Street Right-of-wav A 111dq. setbacks:W (po Sht of official Street Map. 15. Existing Utility Easements? 16. Access Easements: M-2 17. Site Plan checked for, accuracy? 18. Special Requfrpments listed. in Memo to Bldg. Pept. SAO 19. Commercial P, Apt.* PrYlUirements form completed?, 20. Drawi.ngs stamped P, notations made? 21. All Items filled i n 'on N dq. Permi t Application? 22. Bonds ()osted for site work? ,23. Right-of-%wiy Invasion' Permit reoui red? COMMENTY'RYA-1 JAM Z>-w--P^ VM135V "W" 4U 1W2 tA,)L.& h-ft lk de AP".,Aw*, 06 V ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR C�1MERCIAL AND APARTMENT BUILDING PROJECTS Name BEARD/REMODEL OF EXISTING BUILDING AT 131 2d Avenue.S. Date November 23. 1976 STREETS AND ACCESS 1. Right -of -Way Requirements: 60 ft. existing 2. Road.Bed Width: 40 ft existing KI 4. Turn Around: None Sidewalks: 5-foot concrete required 5. Parking Strip: None 6. Access Easements: None UTILITIES 1. water Mains: 8-inch C.I. Main existing 2. Fire Hydrants: Hydrant existing 31. Sewers or Septic Tanks: Connection to sanitary sewer existing. 4. Drainage: Install all necessary storm sewers and drainage facilities per drainage plan and City Standards. Where drainage is across adjacent private property, all parties having any ownership interest in the lands being developed shall provide, as a restriction on the title running with the land, that the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless from any and all claims for damages which may be occasioned to adjacent land by reason of the construction and operation of the drainage system, unless, releases of damages and/or drainage easements are obtained.from the other property owners affected by said drainage. Any drainage problems created by change of contour during development must be corrected prior to occupancy permits or release of performance bond. Final approval (or release of bond) will be withheld until actual drainage as installed has been inspected by the City Engineer. 2123a APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No ........................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ 113-03200 OWNER .......... Alska... Sprtsn... &..Mlpos.t-------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR......--------------------...........--------....................----............................. PERMIT No. ADDRESS ..... 13O--Znd-.NVe*'............................................................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No. .............................................. BLOCK No. ............................................ � I& NAMEOF ADDITION......................................................................................................................................... Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE................................................ By..........----------.................................................. APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No ........................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION Ej REPAIRS Alaska NW Pub. .............. CONTRACTOR............................................................. ................................. PERMIT No....................... ADDRESS ......1 31 2nd Aye-'----S-'--------------.............................................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No............................................... BLOCK No. ..... ---... ..... -•----................... NAMEOF ADDITION------------------------------------------------................................ ................................................. Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE ................................................ BY. ........................................ _ . �I ^Engineering Requ s for Comm'1 & . Apartment Buildin Projects - Page 2 5. Utility Easements: 6. Underground Utilities: To be provided in accordance with Ordinance No. 1387. Street Lighting shall also be provided with the necessary street light standards and underground wiring. TOPOGRAPHY 1. Excavation and -Grading: Excavation and grading shall conform.to the requirements outlined in Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, latest adopted edition,. Vol.' 1. Where extensive.grading and fill are involvedin the -development, a grading plan and specifications shall be prepared: QUOTATION FROM THE CITY CODE REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS 11.02.025(f)' Utilities and Street Improvements. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building or structure of any kind or description unless the plans and specifications include the construction for curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, necessary water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage necessitated by the new construction or improvement, to be built to applicable City.standards, provided, however, if found by the City Engineer to be impractical to construct at'the time of application for said building permit, construction.may be waived by the City Engineer and in lieu thereof a performance bond filed with said engineer to cover the estimated cost of construction to .City standards for said improvements, provided further, in areas zoned single family residential at the time of said application for building permit in which the applicant has received final approval for a plat or sub -division and has compiled with requirements_ therein compliance with this subsection shall be deemed by compliance with the sub -division or plat requirements.. COMMENTS Engineer ; Rev. April 2,'1971 ' 21.23 h r2.1.24 a Reid, Middleton and Asses, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • nners EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 Phone 775-3434 TO CITY OF EDMONDs ENGINEERING DEPT. EnmoNns _ WA 98020 Rrenl/rD TAAY 18 1978 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter Pumic Yruina -A. LACE-Tf$E 3 0[F `-GDURSOM] MU. DATE 18 MAY 1978 JOB NO. 7020—B ATTENTION BILL NIMs RE: TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IN Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION s, J J j c r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: I@ For approval ❑ For your use 0 As requested IN For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.,CONTACT COPY TO SIGNED: < FORM 240-2 - Available from � Townsend. Mass. 014s0 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. A L L A N R . MO R GA Reid, Middleton and Assiates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 Phone 775-3434 TO City of Edmonds Engineering Department Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LEAFM @F URRASOMDUURL DATE May 16 1978 JOB NO. 7020E ATTENTION Bill Nims RE: Preli-minary Estimate RECEIVED Public Works Dept. L4 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑. Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 5/16/78 Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate for Public Improvements for Alaska Magazine Building. l I „ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: E� For approval ❑ For your use [A As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS If you have any questions, please contact our office. COPY TO SIGNED: . &� �� FORM 240-2 - Avallahle from � Towner. Mesa 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Allan R . M&rdan i JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON • ENGINEERS 9 SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (2061 775-3434 May 12, 1978 File No. 7020E ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR RELOCATION OF 18" TRUCK SEWER MAIN NEAR 2ND & JAMES STREET FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE PROJECT 212 l.f. 18" Conc. Sanitary Sewer @ $17.00/1.f. 55 l.f. 8" Conc. Side Sewer @ $10.00/1.f. 2 - 48" Manholes @ $1,000/ea. 650 cu. yds. Class "B" fill per APWA,for Alleyway & James Street @ $6.00/c.y. 2" compacted depth 14" Crushed Rock Base Course 40 tons @ $7.00/ton Subtotal 10% Contingencies Total Engineering and Surveying Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 3,604.00 _ 550.00 2,000.00 3,900.00 280.00 $10,334.00 1,033.00 $11,367.00 500.00 $1.1,867.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN • MARINAS 9 PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT • FI:ASIRII.I'1'Y STUDIES t Estimate of Construction Costs for May 15, 1978 Public Improvements of Proposed James File No. 7020B Street, Alleyway and Parking Lot Page No. 2 Improvement for Alaska Magazine Building • Subtotal � �,� $25,204.00 Sales Tax @ 5.4% 1,361.00 $26,565.00 Estimated Engineering & Survey Cost 1,100.00 Total Development Costs $27,665.00' NOTE: Final design is subject to approval by the City of Edmonds Department of Public Works and the Design Amenities Board. JAMES H. REID (� LEROY F. MIDDLETON RECEIVED `ECEI •1' ED C. WAYNE JONES MAY 16 1978 LLOYD H. NELSON .' + � ,� L��C� Public Works Dept. Rea, � � %n ". ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 324 Mein Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (206� 775.3434 May 15, 1978 File No. 7020E PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF PROPOSED JAMES STREET, ALLEYWAY AND PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE BUILDING James Street - Roadway - 600 sq. yds. 36" Wide Asphalt Concrete `. Pavement Including Base @ $5.00/sq. yd. , $ 3,000.00 360 l.f. - 24" Standard Concrete Curb & Gutters @ $4.50/1.f. 1,620.00 360 l.f. - 5' Wide Concrete Sidewalk @ $5.20/l.f.. 1,872.00 . Storm Sewer - 70 l.f. 8" Concrete Storm Sewer @ $9.50/1.f., 665.00 \. 22 l.f. 10" Concrete Storm Sewer @ $11.00/l.f.- 242.00 \ 2 each Catch Basins @ $450/each 900.00 \ 1 each Catch Basin Inlet @ $250/each 250.00 Total James Street _ $-8.-549:00`�__ A 1 1 eyway� 160 sq. yds. 120 Wide Asphalt Concrete Surface �- W/2' Wide Tickened Edge West Side Including Base @ $5.00/sq. yd. 800.00 Parking Lot ,Paving - 1400 sq. yds. of 2" Compacted Depth Asphalt Concrete Including Base @ $5.00/ $ sq, yyd• 7,000.00 Fill - 1070 cu. yds. Class B fill @ $6'.00/cu. yd.. 6,420.00 Storm Sew er 95 I-f- 24" Galvanized 14 Ga. CMP Storm Sewer @ $12.00/l.f. 1,140.00 15 l.f. 12" Galvanized CMP @ $9.50/1.f. 145.00 1 each Catch Basin @ $450/each 450:00 1 each C.B. Manhole 48" @ $500/each 500.00 1 each Oil Restrictor @ $200/each 200.00 Total Parking Lot 15,855.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN • MARINAS • PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT • FEASIBILITY STUDIES. I JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON Feld, W 6l & o4, I", ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • 1206� 775-3434 May 12, 1978 File No. 7020E ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR RELOCATION OF 18" TRUCK SEWER MAIN NEAR 2ND r; JAMES STREET FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE PROJECT 212 l.f. 18" Conc. Sanitary Sewer @ $17.00/1.f. 55 l.f. 8" Conc. Side Sewer @ $10.00/l.f. 2 - 48" Manholes @ $1,000/ea. 650 cu. yds. Class "B" fi l l per APWA, for Al leyway 6 James Street @ $6.00/c.y, 2" compacted depth 14" Crushed Rock Base Course 40 tons @ $7.00/ton Subtotal 10% Contingencies Total Engineering and Surveying Total Estimated Construction Costs $ 3,604.00 550.00 2,000.00 3,900.00 280.00 $10,334.00 1,033.00 $11,367.00 500.00 $11,867.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENCINEERINGr AIRPORT PLANNING & DESIGN • MARINAS • PORT U INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT • FEASIRILITY STUDIES Reid, Middleton and Assfates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 Phone 775-3434 TO �� srt 47YL(/� $ f Y a/ GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LcE#Ea @IFTR SOMOVURL DATE r/ O JOB NO. -1c ATTENTION` RE: Q 711.1 IF Attached ❑ Under sepa1'rate;cover via the following items: �ints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION p� % ' / ` c_,-, � 7 Y THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: `j FTRor approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted XFor As requested ❑ Returned for corrections review and comment ❑_ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS /��h��.-� ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO - SIGNED: FORM 240-2 - Available bom � Townsend. Mesa 01469 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. JAMES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON Reed, ?ft6ffe&a& o4"4 ktao I". ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • (206) 775.3434 May 12, 1978 File No. 7020E ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR RELOCATION OF 18" TRUCK SEWER MAIN NEAR 2ND & JAMES STREET FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE PROJECT 212 l.f. 18" Conc. Sanitary Sewer @ $17.00/1.f. $ 3,604.00 55 l.f. 8" Conc. Side Sewer @ $10.00/1.f. 550.00 2 - 48" Manholes @ $1,000/ea. 2,000.00 650 cu. yds. Class "B" fill per APWA,for Alleyway b James Street @ $6.00/c.y. 3,900.00 2" compacted depth 14" Crushed Rock Base Course 40 tons @ $7.00/ton 280.00 Subtotal $10,334.00 10% Contingencies 1,033.00 Total $11,367.00 Engineering and Surveying 500.00 Total Estimated Construction Costs $1.1,867.00 MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • ';UrVFI'S r CAnASTPAI_ f-H(INFERING AIRPORT PLANNING 5 DESIGN • KIARINAS • 110R1' 5 1 N D U S I R I A L DLVI:L0PNIFN1 • 1f:A"IIHII_IIYSIUDIES Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland 59 94 591 STATE OF WASHINGTON: s.s COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH: KNOW ALL MEN BY THESJ rPL'S}.IJTS That we Alaska Northwest Publishing Company) as Principal, and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland (IiaC,U(.:1!!c!" Cn,lnv!Y ) A corporation organized and existing, under and by virtue of the laws; of the State of Maryland ns Surety/ !" , are hrl.c, 7n�J t.x�m.t•� bound unto the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, in the venal sum of- $39,533.00 (A11P0UINT), for the payment of which, well and truly to be made, we (="r'mJ.v bind oursoives, our and each of our heirs, executors, admin.i.strators and assi. ,ns, "jointly and severally by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE foregoing obligation is suc'i th, t t}i �h;>> Homed *�rzncioa' is about to file a plat known a:Site work at Alaska Northwest Publishing Co.�_ 2nd STREET, Edmonds, Washington And further condition that within one vi�ar from the date of ar..cer�tanc,2 cf said plat the principal shall install all. utilities and improvements in ola-: as per Utilities Plan, in full compliance with the Standard F;Ian t:cr i'rivate! '?ork on Rights. of Way as approved and ador)ted by the Cl1"r Ur' i:U";Cti Now, therefore,.if the above.named principal shall install all utilities and improvements in said plat as per Utilities Plan, within the time herein specified and according to the platting regulations of the ('tl'Y Oil' i:DHONDS, ldA;;Hlid(;'1'0(J, and observe and obey all rules and requirements of ^c gulati.ons, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain i.n ft:l_I. t orc:e aric! effect. SIGNED, sealed and. delivered this 12th da•1 C)1-- May ly 78 Countersigned: Alaska Northwest Publishing CoTp ny Fidelity & Deposit Company of _Mairvland G 1l;L;UNP, i, c:''"i `dY 1 BY Vance7i Kj-inriey; ttorney-An-Fact 8.64.060 or park a vehicle between the hours specified in this section of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets,_as follows: NAME OF STREET HOURS - STOPPING, STANDING OR DISTRICT OR PARKING PROHIBITED None. . . . . . . . . . . . None [Ord. 1169 §115, 1966]. 8.64.060 SCHEDULE VI - PARKING TIME LIMITED ON CERTAIN STREETS In accordance with Section 8.48.160, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle for a period of time longer than two hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any 'streets Q� of the as follows: 1. Both sides of Bell Street from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue North; 2. South side of Bell Street from Second Avenue North to Third Avenue North; 3: Both sides of Main Street from Railroad Avenue to Sixth; 4. Both sides of James.Street from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue; 5. Both sides of Dayton from Third to 180 feet east of Fifth Avenue South;;' 6. North side of Dayton from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue South; 7. Both sides of Second.Avenue.from Dayton•to 180 feet north of Main; 8. East side of Second Avenue North from 180 feet north of Main Street to Bell Street; 9. Both sides of Third Avenue from Dayton to Bell Street; 10. East side of Third from 120 feet south of Dayton to Dayton; 11. East side of Third Avenue North from Bell to Daley; s 391 8.64.060 or park a vehicle between the hours specified in this section of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows: NAME OF STREET, HOURS - STOPPING, STANDING OR DISTRICT OR PARKING PROHIBITED None . . . . . . . . . . None [Ord. 1169 §115, 1966]. p` 8.64.060 SCHEDULE VI - PARKING TIME LIMITED ON CERTAIN STREETS r" In accordance with Section 8.48.160, and when signs are ,,1% erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a rvehicle for a period of time longer than two hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. of any day except NOS'undays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the'streets as follows: 1. Both sides of Bell Street from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue North; 2. South side of Bell Street from Second Avenue North to Third Avenue North; 3. Both sides of Main Street from Railroad Avenue to Sixth; 4. Both sides of James;Street from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue; 5. Both sides of Dayton from Third to 180 feet east of Fifth Avenue South;;' 6. North side of Dayton from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue South; 7. Both sides of Second Avenue from Dayton to 180 feet north of Main; 8. East side of Second Avenue North from 180 feet north of Main Street to Bell Street; 9. Both sides of Third Avenue from Dayton to Bell Street; -East side of Third from 120 feet south of Dayton to Dayton; 11. East side of Third Avenue North from Bell to Daley; 391 Tpi�', • FILE 8.64.060 or park a vehicle between the hours specified in this section of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows: NAME OF STREET HOURS - STOPPING, STANDING OR DISTRICT OR PARKING PROHIBITED None . . . . . . . . . . . None [Ord. 1169 §115, 1966]. 8.64.060 SCHEDULE VI - PARKING TIME LIMITED ON CERTAIN STREETS In accordance with Section 8.48.160, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle for a period of time longer than two hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six_p.m.-of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the'streets as follows: 1. Both sides of Bell Street from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue North; 2. South side of Bell Street from Second Avenue North to Third Avenue North; 3. Both sides of Main Street from Railroad Avenue to Sixth; 4. Both sides of James Street from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue; 5. Both sides of.Dayton from Third to 180 feet east of Fifth Avenue South;;' 6. North side of Dayton from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue South; 7. Both sides of Second Avenue from Dayton to 180 feet north of Main; 8. East side of Second Avenue North from 180 feet north of Main Street to Bell Street; 9. Both sides of ThirdAvenue from Dayton to Bell Street; 10. East side of Third from 120 feet south of Dayton to Dayton; 11. East side of Third Avenue North from Bell to Daley; 391 8.64.060 or park a vehicle between the hours pecified in this section of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows: NAME OF STREET HOURS - STOPPING, STANDING OR DISTRICT OR PARKING PROHIBITED None .. . . . . . . . . . . . None [Ord. 1169 5115, 1966]. 8.64.060 SCHEDULE VI - PARKING TIME LIMITED ON CERTAIN STREETS In accordance with Section 8.48.160, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a vehicle for a period of time longer than two hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the 'streets as follows: 1. Both sides of Bell Street from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue North; 2. South side of Bell Street from Second Avenue North to Third Avenue North; 3. Both sides of Main Street from Railroad Avenue to Sixth; 4. Both sides of James Street from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue; 5. Both sides of Dayton from Third to 180 feet east of Fifth Avenue South;;' 6. North side of Dayton from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue South; 7. Both sides of Second Avenue from Dayton to 180 feet north of Main; 8. East side of Second Avenue North from 180 feet north of Main Street to Bell Street; 9. Both sides of Third'Avenue from.Dayton to Bell Street; 10. East side of Third from 120 feet south of Dayton to Dayton; 11. East side of Third Avenue North from Bell to Daley; 391 8.64.060 or park a vehicle between the hours specified in this section of any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows: NAME -OF STREET, HOURS - STOPPING, STANDING OR DISTRICT OR PARKING PROHIBITED None, , , , , , . . . None [Ord. 1169 §115, 19661. 8.64.060 SCHEDULE VI - PARKING TIME LIMITED ON CERTAIN STREETS In accordance with Section 8.48.160, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall park a' vehicle for a period of time longer than two hours between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. of 'any day except Sundays and public holidays within the district or upon any of the'streets as follows: 1. Both sides of Bell Street from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue North; 2. South side of Bell Street from Second Avenue North to' Third Avenue North; 3. Both sides.of Main Street from Railroad Avenue to Sixth; 4. Both sides of James Street from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue; 5. Both sides of Dayton: 'from Third to 180 feet east of Fifth Avenue South;;' 6. North side of Dayton from Railroad Avenue to Third Avenue South; 7. Both sides of Second Avenue from Dayton to 180 feet north of Main; 8. East side of Second Avenue North from 180 feet north of Main Street to Bell Street; 9. Both sides of Third Avenue from Dayton to Bell Street; 10. East side of Third from 120 feet south of Dayton to Dayton; 11. East side of Third Avenue North from Bell to Daley; 391 (W TER -OFFICE COMMUN TIONS DATE December I TO 'PLANNING FROM BUILDING *-KShN:E1ERIMG ;j FORM 41 - LITTLE'S SUBJECT: 1 Alaska Publishing @ 130 2nd Avenue S. Permit #810189 1. Please do a final inspection at the above project and return comments or final approval to Building. lqc 11 Suspense date :12s%:1382 1 1 L,4 511WN /Z-f- ,F?/ UR L u FILE Tr ' CITY OF'EDMONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Alaska Publishing House r=13 Second Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 Gentlemen: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR November 16, 1982 As agreed to between your firm and Felix deMello, Buildings and Grounds Supervisor, two benches were installed at the Mini Park adjacent to your Alaska Publishing property. Enclosed is an invoice for reimbursement. Sincerely, JOHN B. MITCHELL Superintendent of Public Works FdM:jkw Enclosure cc: ',Margaret,Hi,li Conni Curtis • Duplicate INVOICE CITY OF EDMONDS Sold To Alaska Publishing House Benches for Mini Park Materials: $ 9.00 Hardware & Stain $ 12.02. $ 21.02 Tax 6.7% 1.42 Sub -Total $ 22.44 Equipment Time (3 hrs x $2.18/hr.) $ 6.54 Labor (5 hrs @ $15.52/hr.) $ 77.60 " TOTAL $106.58 • Edmonds, Washington Invoice No. .2006 Job No. Dote November 15, 1982 Your Order No. •.6. .1:Sr'}t:' Ara. s: _ ; {{�r:Y'. J. �... Y j.E R ACCOUNTING OFFICE � ' 130 — 2nd AYe. So. . . Edmonds, Wash. 98020 49900 LIFE pN TrF_ LAST FgpNTIER. COVERING THE ALAS'+A HiGHWA�VILE By .MILE DATE December 7, 1982 19-10 • 1250 ..... •A�a .A.J 9.N rvv R r406'P rry1r' - 1.nt�.• I�i1�11Q j -. i� PAY =w-p(1i81irfV'r,� I DOLLARS $ 106.58 VALID FOR 90 DAYS TO THE r ORDER CITY OF EDMONDS ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING CO. OF / Department of Public Works 200 Dayton St. BY , Edmonds., WA 98020 L BY Main Branch PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON 1: 1 2 5000 1051:00 1 ? 10 3 309 31111 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON ' r ALASKA Agazine and THE MILEPOST accounting office DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT 130 - 2nd Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington 98020 THE ATTACHED CHECK IS IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW DATE I DESCRIPTION I AMOUNT I DISCOUNT OR DEDUCT. I NET AMOUNT 12-7-82 Two benched per 11/16/82 letter from John B. Mitchell 900-75 106.58 PAY PERIOD ENDING EMPLOYEE NAME HOL./VAC. HR5. REG. HOURS I O.T. HOURS TOTAL HOURS PAY RATE SOCIAL SECURITY NO. HOLIDAY / VACATION I REGULAR OVERTIME GROSS WAGES WITHHOLDING TAXES F.I. C. A. STATE INCOME TAX STATE IND. INS. MEDICAL INSURANCE OTHER TOTAL DEDUCTIONS Y�. NET EARNINGS EMPLOYEE: THIS IS A STATEMENT OF YOUR EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS FOR THE PERIOD INDICATED. APPLICATION The City of Edmonds for ENT NO . ................. SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT ... NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS 0 LID NO- ----- ---------- _ASMT. NO. OWNER ----- ..-__---_--tom -------- CONTRACTOR --------- FNAS ....... I ------------------------- PERMIT No. Co JOB ADDRESS --- - --- Z ------- � ----------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. --------- ................... -------- BLOCK NO. ...................... .. . . -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------- NAME OF ADDITION ------------------- DATE - B I 'CITY.... -OF EDt-,`, �, �� tNDS' a�S�IpE� �SiE�WEI�` PERMIT WATER -SEWER +DEPARTMENT 'W: �- { ? Call 776-2624 for aide sewer Inspectionsr n)SFORF coverin " - i r g any portion oP the construction \dnspectlon will be-,provideds.wtthin 7.4t hoursaftery requst 1N0 gat 8un:,�;or, holiday ,Inspections) ADDRESS LOCATION OF CONST,RUCTIUN .:..1.. :<�• t� Jam- :5 'PROPERTYz L^EGAL -DESCRIPTION %:C�:..:. �' )` (. ;. . ...... :::: f �E ............:..........:.......: ............................. OWNER AND%OR`BUIL•DER.:..�...... 4;CONTRACTOR'SwNAME & ADDRESS f < �t. S n �j�'tmission isgranted.: / 7 tem n'accordarice with bit of Edmond 3i ordinancos i • 18,.� for rep :and%or connection of a side sewer to the city sanitarY4 sewer yi-'.ice:,^-si.var..r�•t•r.-c.•.,,,,�!••.a r _y� ` TIONiIS CALLED TO THE:FOLLOWING ie t t 1 aNr No 1 ;ThetisewerIn-a the property may obtain a permit=to construct sewer Ins lde:property;line. .A Ilcenaed Side' Sewer Contractor�muat be'em 1• `- side;sewer ln•atreet area Do'not,cover.any portion of .aewen,betore-:,IC••hIde.pr pens li e. ; - -..NOTE-No 2� Ail4work - � - - � � � -. �.: Poyedhto conatruct'• i performed fn'piey right-of-wa.y requires':an Invasion. of-.RJght'-of. Way. Permit'obtalnable` from the City- Engineer's ottice • -•NOTE No: 3hObtaln-full iri[ormatlonregaxdfng'Ordinance 1118.030 and'Regulatlons:' overnln n. � - rR YNOTE.11or 4 ToPJO, slde.aewer must -.,at: 30;inches:,coverage:at'property Iine-and.l2�i ches Inside propert gllnc�mfn r sharper than';y. wlllabe permitted-. y 1 imum grade oP 2 ,. Ntie�bende in NOTE Nos �T�eochearfn •street muet`be' water, seftled and surface of street restored to. original condition Contractors shall be rca grads a % work which;fnay develop within one year of completion NOTD-No.raB—IL fa--unlawful:'to alter or do any other' work than -ia - - Ponsible. for'•tallure due 'to Improper , aert the Pipe+into the•wye _ Provided for In thji,e-permit orvto do any w'rk,on the, rrialn sewer or tta; appurtenances ;exceptao, In .DISAPPROVED' ,� Date ` By:. Date... f °$A`PPROV I sk � BY, Date ...... gy �Y; y SY -�-- b.. 3 i.y- lR- a ••1",,.,. :< a Y a t.............................................................t Remarks , CA .. ...... s t F a _. I � ' i'BO 4� Pet7n z ,QPI iUST Be SignedtBytO.wnei of Firm:Performllig Construction PRIOR To 9 pection F b weer of consractin v!n erformingr construction) m hereby certifytthat the side sewer stailatitin constirizcted;under ahis permit staff in eorda ee with governingprdIrp. es of,�the CJty of Edmonds ` r t , ? Da tie mar tedtFlis day, of f Jr Check BEFORE .......................... 19<� a You .dig for Water ,,'Gas 10 Telephone Power �,¢ ❑, �Sewe�/+ •..�5i.wf.�,-t:":'➢5�'`•x^: .. n--.t�•..y:.,,,.L..:nt..�.....1ir.a.:...e.,.s.. ...� ,.,. -.. .. - ., - ._. - ,.7 a City of Edmonds APPLICATION for SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO . ............. ............... NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS LID NO. - ASMT. NO. .................. OWNER���1�� JOB ADDRESS---.�`-5 C)---------- - ` `----- --- ------------------- CONTRACTOR ..... (/------- \\-:70-1�-----/t/---- PERMIT NO- -------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ................ BLOCK NO. .................................... BY--------------- ------------------------------------ •- •/7-- I 1 5 CITY OF EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 16, 1982 Alaska Publishing House 130_Second Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 Gentlemen: As agreed to between your firm and Felix deMello, Buildings and Grounds Supervisor, two benches were installed at the Mini Park adjacent to your Alaska Publishing property. Enclosed is an invoice for reimbursement. Sincerely, JOHN B. MITCHELL Superintendent of Public Works FdM:jkw Enclosure cc: Margaret Hill Conni Curtis '--7Rc�tt! Ak onda M h dt. Felix deMello dt. • - Duplicate INVOICE CITY OF EDMONDS Edmonds, Washington (. 2 Sold To Alaska Publishing House Invoice No. 2006 Job No. Date November 15, 1982 Your Order No. Benches for Mini Park Materials: $ 9.00 Hardware & Stain $ 12.02 $ 21.02 Tax 6.7% 1.42 Sub -Total $ 22.44 Equipment Time (3 hrs x $2.18/hr.) $ 6.54 Labor (5 hrs @ $15.52/hr.) $ 77.60 TOTAL $106.58 CITY OF E ®M ®N ® S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 R E C El v E D DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SCP 13 7982 CITY, OF. EDMOND:S September 10, 1982 Alaska Publishing Company I; 130 2rd Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Sirs: A sprinkler line was broken in conjunction with the construc-' tion of James Street by one of your contractors. After repeated, contacts and attempts with your general contractor to get the problem corrected, the City completed the work. Please remit the amount shown on the attached statement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 771-3202, extension 298. Sincerely, - FELIX DEMELLO Buildings & Grounds Supervisor EJH:jkw cc: Dan Smith Planning Division Attachment BILLING ITEMS FOR JAMES STREET SPRINKLER CORRECTIONS 1. 30' of 1" p.v.c. @ $.30/ft. 2. 3 p.v.c. elbows @ $.30/ea. 3. 2 works (summer help) @ $4.00/hr. (4 man hours) 4. 6 hours full-time worker @ 17.50/hr. 5. 1 vehicle (Unit 10) for 10 hrs. @ $5.00/hr. $ 9.00 .90 $16.00 $105.00 $50.00 $180.90 6.7% Tax 12.12 Total Amount Due $193.02 CITY OF E D M O N ®S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS September 10, 1982 Alaska Publishing Company 130 2rd Avenue South Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Sirs: A sprinkler line was broken in conjunction with the construc- tion of James Street by one of,your contractors. After repeated contacts and attempts with your general contractor to get the problem corrected, the City completed the work. Please remit the amount shown on the attached statement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 771-3202, extension 298. EJH:jkw cc: Dan Smith Planning Division Attachment 9 �o112- Marg,&ret Hill dt. (Actg. Off. Admin.) Sincerely, FELIX DEMELLO Buildings & Grounds Supervisor. Ed Huntley dt. J ck Mitchell dt. BILLING ITEMS FOR JAMES STREET SPRINKLER CORRECTIONS 1. 30' of 1" p.v.c. @ $.30/ft. $ 9.00 2. 3 p.v.c. elbows @ $.30/ea. .90 3. 2 works (summer help) @ $4.00/hr. (4 man hours) $16.00 4. 6 hours full-time worker @ 17.50/hr. $105.00 5. 1 vehicle (Unit 10) for 10 hrs. @ $5.00/hr. $50.00 $1 80.90 6.7% Tax 12.12 ',Total Amount,bue- $193.02 FILE COPY CITY OF EDMONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 28, 1981 Reid, Middleton and Associates, Inc. 121 5th Avenue North Suite 200 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: .'Allan'Morgan Gentlemen: SUBJECT: DRAINAGE PLAN FOR ALA_SKA PUBLISHING.. 130 2ND AVENUE SOUTH HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Prior to approval of the subject drainage plan, two items which we discussed with your office need additional detailing. First, roof and foundation drains should be tied to a catch basin which is adjacent to the property. Our suggested location is shown on the enclosed drawing. Second, the field modifications to the outlet control manhole are causing ponding problems on adjacent, pedestrian -oriented areas. A revised design detail is needed for the outlet manhole and north- west corner of the parking lot. A fairly inexpensive approach was suggested by phone to your office. If you have any questions, please contact Bob Franklin at 771-2302 extension 282. Sincerely, IZA� JAMES E. ADAMS, P.E. City Engineer RRF: jky Enclosure BOB FRANKLIN DT. Z d U a a a CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. *Address or vi inity of Construction 130-o1W_4t¢ =e; • Owner: Name 430 Mailing Address �y�Q City, State, Zip Code • Contractor: !,,44:I? S C Qx�-5T I Name MaililgAdqss��:.��1 City, State, Zip Code Permit No. �2 _ I? Issue Date -� • Permit Issued To: • Type of Work to be Done: • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ZComml. / Ind. ElApt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes ❑ No State License Number Telephone Number �r NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE yt d B. APPLICANTNTO .READ AND SIGN -_ - \' , INDEMNITY: Applicant uhd'erstands and.by_,his signature to this application, agrees to hold',the •City; of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made u� against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal a proceedings including\ defense' costs, court costs, and\attorney fees, by reason of granting this permit. U Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship,- and materials for a' period of one year CQ following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. 0\ . t� Fyhds held, from the..Secuity Deposit `'(estimatFd restoration fee). will. be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.' Work is to be inspected. Restoration,to be -in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to 12e- ept clean at all :times. A .2.4'No-r•-i�otice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must be available at &e job site for inspection purposes at all -times. Signature: �%'�`.��/�',1,�,���C,Cy�fi,/,� Date 3A?21 Owner or Agent THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES * �t CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Ode, Time Authorized: Void after days Special Conditio.s: dam/®/ Ammendments: Permit Fee: Security Deposit Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X_ I�q WORK TO BEGIN PRYO TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECTION NO (Fund 111 - R.oe cony to Street Dent.) Comments: Diagram: Contractor called for inspection Yes No Work Disanproved By• Date: By: Date: ?cork Approved By: Date: �_ T Inspector: Ena. Div. December 1978 CITY OF EDMONDS .Permit No. �l8 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT{ C �, Issue Date f l q t RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT U tl la;i ;ram RE A. *Address or vicinity of Construction d' 7> _- - _,J X,�V&..g 5 • Owner C'45k-k'1 Name Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code • Permit Issued To: • Type of Work to be Done: • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family C91"Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes 1;1-�No • Contractor:_,(—& / Name Mailing A dre State License Number City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be.made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must be/i'vailable at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Date le V or Agent �k THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES it CALL DIAL = DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By Time Authorized: Void after days Special Conditions: U Ammendments: Permit Fee: -20 Security Deposit: Receipt No REC'FunYIII Fee: O �Streggg4t Dimensions X = u. i * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. December 1978 u FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route cony to :street Dept. rnmmnntc Diagram: Contractor called for inspection Yes No Mork Disapproved By: ate: Bv: _ Date: [cork .Approved By: Date: � Inspector: Rncr, nix7. necemhPr 1()7R CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTrfu !�' (FILL RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMTRI A. *Address or vicinity of Construction 0-.0 7 W P S (�ai.li� ) • Owner: At�n<<Y A Name_ --I,C .i -2 W 0 1,a.J Mailing Address I_ nmof\los wn- rqow City, State, Zip Code • Contractor: < . Name a Mailing Address AA� City' State, Zip Code Permit No. Issue Date • Permit Issued To: *Pk Y) • Type of Work to be Done:-T 0- C-7. i � 'E l�i� ..a V'� .1 1~ • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family lecomml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: a' Yes ❑ No State License Number Telephone Number 1r * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this Signatun t must be available at the job'site for inspection purposes at all times. Owner or THIS PERMIT MUST BE PC►STED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Time Authorized: Void after days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund 111 Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X= * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 Eng. Div. December 1978 Ll 30 ' EEC 1 `�- 7-. A- 3oc jI C�02- u� I; yl- - I h1TERCE.PT ,a;, DUCT I •1 z u I 0 Ex1 r I Nc� 1 cQ OF --5" C. (>� CJ-15TUtvt EV` �U 1 tJ �t ;fit .L._ I q0' OF "3'' P v' �. I �T1�� I �L�^� 1 t O' OF t—rU 10' o� Y' ILI A - I OF- 3 RuM5 rDu<::--T Oc'� -To A - ► C 4 1 , . I ►�JS-raLL D.��.-r © C �ti�tiJ T -ro � I $ A- I c0" L.i a 3' Y, LD1 AMU►JD Pl._-. C' E ►JT�. C ;i::..E_ i :.; � _ CL.S S-i'- OM >vI= e`_=_, Dl,..,C.-T O ►to, A- IU/�IcD A-1C,41cD Gl-�-TOM E 7-0 X ,q, _ J:, Cu `-t`vR•�1��� �O 1 NST�.�. ��,) CaL1APC� ��.�-TS . `/lA 4 4GS4 I J42c� EX 1 `jT A - F. Z� . C-P.-T-• � 3�8�-�0 542'.> 154 22. i I IL-4 21 1351 REV.5181 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT No 1 of Snohomish County Sour 1 C�i l>�J7' Area J50 -'LAD/ ND ^"' 74E��p LOCATION POLE NO. - cj�--- '/, S T 2--7 R 3 DATE WO. NO "'..r �.-- +�• JOB NO. i r+i��P' s\r " REASON FOR WORK IN/���\ /�'��L-.-/ �'Vi._.�� T'':,iU1Vl�1 ENGINEERy/'�'�u��'U.(; FILE �,j,^^7 NO, 2-` L�'- e- \ �J,`.��(5,KtS �c�t �J Q f ��- A��✓ I� j �T_ 1� '-�^-_I .?1� ���7 DRAFTER SCALE APPROVALS DATE WORK COMPLETED j t BY FOR SUBSTATION �aC -�� FEES REQUIRED �YEl}ES � NO CIRCUIT NO. 17-- 44-7 P��MiT '. W�— xxo `� xx U CO►QTRAC/T 3,CD.44 1C'1915/ 0 > 1 SUNDRIF`:- --_ BASIC I 1 �.! f `•.i�.L.E� `+V' �„1..,�.+ METER POLE ^�--------.-C-�— e DATE--1_`_'^_"((".'']]_4_���.rr_��_..++'�T1 i- -- AMOUNT DATE PRINTED 2" 31, )--- AM Chi-IOLF- _A- 300C wP.l..t- X �U %i j \� ENVIRONMENTAL ANAIYSIS EXEMPT ❑NOT EXEMPT �C PARA. _L:.1_ ITEM C. V,G. COND. "7. -Z... KV ADD a0QCKT.Fl. PH. REMV. CKT FT. PH. NET 2 CKT. FT. U.G. COND. KV ADD 3(`T. FT. PH REMV. CKT- PH• NET CKT. FT• PERMITS DATE TYPE GRANTED ❑ TREE TRIMMING ❑ STATE ❑ COUNTY �j,��-•��, O CITY �DM✓vl.w.' 0 EASEMENTS CKREOUIRED ❑NOT REQUIRED DATE RELEASED FOREIGN CONTACTS ❑GTNW 1PN NO ❑CATV LPN NO El POLE STENCILING FROM TO LAKE OFF POLE ❑TREE TRIMMING WATER EDIAL DIG ®SEWER XPUD LOCATOR aflAS XBACKHOE ❑ STREET LIGHTS LOGS POSTED U-MAPS TRANSF CARDS POLE DEPT CIRCUITS I OCAT InN PAGE �- MAP DISPATCHER POSTED W.O. NO..-Y7 1 ' TW 1►�I `S-T CA,C�L. E _7 7- 4F--t.3 A.- 1041c--) -Fj - x MpUll iI iFIN i t I I j I� i�( � i i TO FORM 41 - LITTLE'S SUBJECT: All' � %Z cam( G'/�C � �� � itr�"""� fjL V /L Ael 70 'ov 0":;rCJ��11/ GG�/2I C r__ INTER -OFFICE COMM U N I CATIO,j)A S DATE 19 FROM A E W 2 3 0 BUILDING DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) �L1) ()Now 0 S rrrEar+�waEYaarn-.w. USE Applicant Fill ZONE 1 Inside Heavy Lines J06 ADDRESS 1,30 � a LEGAL DESCRIPTION ;?MIT MBER 11U2 'moo,,LTh _ _Z_cilh0 IVISION I SHORT SU13 NO. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP HONE NUMBER EXISTING- I PROPOSED ff DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY 11) U, N C F ADDRESS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED N",-ro r-(.'o'i Uv DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED /❑ S"e�. `�/� r: O ; U C CITY < TELEPHONE NUMBER y UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER {-( XI ✓/— m M1 NAME SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ'D ❑ ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS N , ❑ 0 ADDRESS F U (11-� & FOOTINGS REO'D Z CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER `�rJ� SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED F U STATE LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY / D A -\.3 k - <,, c. * 2 N/�tl�%9, Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) METER SIZE I BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE Z L o-C j . ' 3 L C W O < c 3 u W J REMARKS SIGN AREA ALLOWED I PROPOSED REMARKS VARIANCE OR CU YARDS NEW RESIDENTIAL 11:1 a GAS LINE FRONT FIRE ZONE 7V ' / ADD ❑ ALTER ® NON-RESIDENTIAL DEMOLISH EXCAVATE OR FILL SIGN RETAINING WALL a FENCE ( X_FT) SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED ❑ YES ❑ NO PLAN CHECKED BY ❑ REPAIR IINSP. E swim POOL REMARKS Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 0 DWELLING f 3 UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE !Y inGAA-IT1010 0 m PLAN CHECK FEE 0 ��It P BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL FENCE SIGN N "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless i the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and It It agents from any and all claims for damages of .whatever nature, s arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. nature, RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL ENV. REVIEW ADB MPLETE) EXEMPT SHOREL PLANNING REVIEW BY I DATE COVERAGE SIDE REAR OF CONSTRUCTYN CODE HEIGHT AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPAI GROUP LOAD THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. VALUATION I FEE o I ., ance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce 6 , 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR2IT aiEa .IST BUILDING PERMIT REVIIEW /17 2N1� .4UE - 2 "((address) ate 0 Street Right -of -Way Existing to REQD -� z Access Easements Existing 4zy� REQD H vG Utility Easement Existing '° REQD Per Subdivision Plat Assessor Map SaG �� w Site Plan Checked for Accuracy z Underground Wiring Reqd. 0 Check Accuracy of Legal Descri. tion 2 Review by Date w Existing Water Main Size 9"Cl, anS� Water Main Required Service Line Required ' Hydrant Size Existing �ry x Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code Size w Detector Check Meter Reqd. Cross Connection Inspection H Fire Department Conments d 3 Water Meter Char e Regd. Review bye _ Date /oZ 1,72�v Septic Tank Design Approved A14 Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. /Vf Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability r/,-S Drawing No. s 'File�, No. Side Sewer Availability .� x w Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd. -- 3 Review by� Date - w `n Open Ditch Existing Regd. Culvert Reqd. ze t6eate ad Catch Basin Reqd. ii /r h, on Site Plan O Shoulder drainage maintain collection on Swale open runoff, H Manhole egd.lhe� Indicate on Site Plan �--- Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Review bye. Date Revised: lv10-1977 Page 2 40 Street Paving Reqd. * zr H Curb and Gutter Reqd. /1 w Sidewalk Reqd. w Curb Cut for Driveway Regd. a; Right -of -Way Construction Permit Reqd. H Bond Regd. for Public Improvements Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Sighing Reqd. A/,/ ca. Pre Permit Site Inspection made on z ,a off BY: S94ER H w w WATER a N STREET ENGINEERING Special Requirements listed in memo to C=Lmity Development Department, Building Division BY. Date o All items filled in on Building PermitApplica.tion Ad BY Date P' Drawings Stamped and Notations Made Q' BY Date d Approved by Public Works Department Revised: lv 10-1977 DATE: MEMO,TO: Building Division Communitv Development Department FROM: Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT :. After review'of the subject Building Permit application, we have the' following comments: 1. Connection to City water system required 2. -Connection to Citv sanitary sewer system required. 3. Right-of-way Permit required ..for any work- on City property . 4, Driveway slopenotto exceed 14%. 5. Backwater valve required if doiviistairs p1timbing _is below ........... elevation of upstream manhole. 6. Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10,foo t minimum. 1pjoji5 pey- Ord 192-4 rr-q ti, 40 (J t rot I V-'a Y-0 LA 'Signature r '1, n ALASHA nORTHWEST PUBLISHIIIG t0111Pnny Legal Description: Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 2, Gepharts 1st addition to Edmonds, according to Platt Volume 5, Page 43. ALASKA' magazine The MILEPOST.' The Alaska Journal' - Alaska Geographic Book Department 130 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington 98020, 206/774.4111 ALASKA@ magazine The MILEPOST® The Alaska Journal® Alaska Geographic® Book Department .' .- A V E® , JAN 5 1984 'u.jlic Works Won 110RTHUIEST PUBLISH111G t0111my December 31, 1980 VTR F I L Mr. Dan Smith Engineering Inspector Engineering Division, Public Works Department City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Smith: We reference to our building permit application for property at 130 Second Avenue South, we are contacting Reid Middleton for necessary drainage survey and when all the figures are in we will renew our bond with hopes to complete our construction later in the calendar year. S'inc rely, e Robert A. Henning President RAH:bao cc: Hal M. Reeves, Building Division 130 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington 98020, 206/774-4111 RIDER To be attached to and form a part of.___ .......... Pad.....S.DJ1.lri...................................................Bond, No... i 459.1...---........, dated the ............... 1.7tf!.....--_--....................... day of ............... MAY ................................... 19.78__, issued by the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT Alaska Northwest Publishin Com an COMPANY OF MARYLAND, as Surety, on behalf ol....... ---------------------•----------....._.......----........_...-----.......----•------....9......--•••---p--.....y................... ...----•........................................................... as Principal, Ten Thousand Four Hundred Ei ht five & no/100 in the penal sum ot._............ •.-----.._....•--••-..9--•---•y ---•........................... .............• ---•-Dollars ($1!O,•485 00-•), Cit of Edmonds, Washin ton and in favor of._.S.i..ty ... ......................•-••-.....•...••..•..-••...-..._...------•q......._......-•-----................_........._...._.....-•--•--................_.....•..-.••-.•.•-..-.....•.•.•.-.. In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is hereby agreed that the attached bond be amended as follows: It is hereby understood and agreed that the amount of the above captioned bond is amended to read as follows: Eleven Thousand Five Hundred Thirty -Three and no/ 00ths-1$1 \� y 1 1,533.00} ' Dol1ars STHLL. l FILE; Provided, However, that the attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements, limitations and conditions except as herein expressly modified, and further that the liability of the Surety under the attached bond and the attached bond as amended by this rider -shall not be cumulative. This rider shall become effective as of the ...................... 17 t h_____ day of.................. M ay___..___........................19..8 0. Signed, sealed and dated this ..... ............2 5 t h... day of .... n_e................................. 19.8O ATTEST: _.i:aska.... No.rthwe.st..._Publ_i,sh..n.g... Co —-... .................................................... PRINCIPAL ................... ... »._ .............. L/_� ------------------------ FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND AccEPTE'D': City o�Edmonds i- - i - . Tim Larson, Attorney -in -Fact ]1123 (50-723; 50.722)-20M, 849 208022 - -,_... +a, 7x�,._ :�'.: 4.ai'i+W1.,.. ... .,.1 .. i:.., rza. _. ._ 1zW-,.A►.�.....:..i.�..u:_..r.::... ..:.;�._':.wt:h..r'-�. ,-,� .,-.�-�.. .,i.u: ..:,. -,v '�. ?dr !NW`+�iw @I`?�*�*;...... ��'R RECtlVF ® Reid, Middleton & AssoiVeo9Mc. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 01� 324 Moin Street, Edmonds, VJoshington 98020 iI ii James Street ® (206) 775-3434 Do`s"' Revised May 9, 1980 File No. 7020B PRELIMINARY -ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS OF JAMES STREET AND ALLEYWAY FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE BUILDING EXPANSION .Roadway - 470 sq. yds. 28' wide asphalt concrete pavement including base @ $5.75/sq. yd. 360 l.f. 24" standard concrete curb b gutters @ $5.20/l.f. ' 360 l:f. 5' wide concrete sidewalk @ $5.40/l.f. Storm Sewer 32 l.f. 8" concrete storm sewer @ $9.50/1.f. .22 l.f. 10" concrete storm sewer @ $11.00/1.f. .2 catch basins @*$700.00 ea. Total James Street I� Alleyway 160 sq. yds. 12' wide -asphalt concrete surface with 2' wide thickened edge west side including base @ $5.75/sq. yd. Subtotal Sales tax @ 5.4% (excluding A.C.) 0STR F� $ 2 , 702.50 &-"oK 1,872.0o ✓ 1,944.00P 304.00 242.00 ✓ 1,400.00 ✓ $ 8,464.50 $ 920.00 $ 9,384.50 146.00 $ 9,530.50 10% Contingency \ 954.00 Total Development Costs $ 10,484.50 ," //0 e NOTE:, Final design is subject to approval by the City of Edmonds Department of Pub l i c Works and the Design Amenities Board. /// This estimate excludes construction staking and engineering'supervision. �/i 33 � �✓ �-� °.e���.r l�� O'er"+ J. AOL 47 4 III 1 j3�0 i-! �=W-4 7 T_` °�_ - �_T*--+---�-_ _ _� Yam_' -__I , ___ ..-_ .-...__--!---+---�!�"--�-I.--t-.-L�.--�._.--:----y--f--•=�f-y ' I '-F--1-•-„ 7t- 44 i14- TITT t 4 r + } - i '- -t _ � . _ I � J Q/nr="/�/9L 1' � _ - /- � � _+---�y � _ _ Q�. � ///r�^T - � --;- T—��� a Q I,—� I -• - + --• -•-: - I i._ t ' ' _-�_ � � + - -, �` �µ ._ .1--+ T(•%-/ ��-I�-}�!/l�iv1�,7�/ ,/�/ / ��/(-�--'-- 1-�, '� - `-_/� 1 _ -h. � �-_r__•- _ ' __*-'_ 46 T_ 7 T-1 _j4-7 7 7 PUBLIC WORKS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT NAME: AL S4 !ON.I 41 Ora CQ. F I LE w' ASSESSMENT DATED: rid AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE: WNRMUMM9 Uivl- A M61011, Mill Mtn b , Me CRIME O&AP.2% io- 1!�--40 W- lly t=�% G r(► s - A ��► fu��\ ............ . PREPARED BY: SATE: REVISED: 10/77LV • January 21, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering Division. SUBJECT: ADB REVIEWS ADB-2-80 --Alaska Northwest.Publicshing Company, Behm Architects; review of elevations, parking layout and Dayton Street completion. The Engineering Division is presently working with the architects concerning various aspects of the parking lot layout and James Street overlay. We recommend approval of this item subject to agreements between the City and applicant concerning design and materials to be used in the completion of James Street. v DS:jak ./a .121Fa Smith . FOLD HERE FOLD 'HERE Fideli y and Deposit �ompany MO. HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 1980 n 00 of Eft1wds General Form Status Inquiry Novel. Oft F City of Edmonds, Community Development Dept. 4-9-80 19 Edmonds, Washington OUR BOND NO. �g4tt�,ca>t L CONTRACTOR: ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING COMPANY DESCRIPTION: FLAT BOND ATEER TUC YEARS BILL. ANNUALLY ALASKA NORTHWEST PURL ISHI,KG CCU. x OWNER: CITY OF EDMONDS* MASHINGTON CONTRACT PRICE BOND(S) 39,533. EFFECTIVE DATE 05/17/78 WITHOUT PREJUDICING YOUR RIGHTS OR AFFECTING OUR LIABILITY UNDER OUR BOND(S) DESCRIBED ABOVE, WE WOULD APPRECIATE SUCH OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IS NOW AVAILABLE. BY VERY TRULY YOURS* Richard W. Recob 1. IF CONTRACT COMPLETED* PLEASE STATE: APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMPLETION OF WORK (OR FINAL DELIVERY) APPROXIMATE ACCEPTANCE DATE FINAL CONTRACT'PRICE S 2. IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED* PLEASE STATE: APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OR DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONTRACT COMPLETED OR DELIVERED 3. DO YOU KNOW OF UNPAID BILLS FOR LABOR OR MATERIAL? (CHECK) YES NO 4. REMARKS: (IF ANY) SIGNATURE It is understood that the information contained herein is furnished as a matter of courtesy for the confidential use of the surety and is merely an expression of T I TL E opinion. It is also agreed that in furnishing this information, no guaranty or warranty of accuracy or correctness is made and no responsibility is assumed as a result of reliance by the surety, whether such information is furnished by the owner or by an architect or engineer as the agent of the owner. DATE 19__ PLEASE RETURN INQUIRY TO: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND General Form Status 212 NCRTHUP OFFICE CENTER 7ECEEVED General Form Statue Inquiry —Federal cases to be submitted in duplicate. Stamped addressed envelopes to be attached. 3101 N C,R TH UP ' WAY SI 5541 ' BELLEVUE * WASHI NGTCKI 98004 Fideli and De osit man HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 General Form Status Inquiry F. City of Edmonds, Community Development Dept. Edmonds, Washington 4-*9-80 19� OUR BOND NO. 5994591 FOLD JM .PERE CONTRACTOR: ALASKA NORTHWEST PUeL ISHING CCNPANY U�`= o-, DESCRIPTION: PLAT BOND ATEER TWO YEARS`8ILL ANNUALLY ALASKA NORTHWEST PUeL ISHIKG CC* OWNER: CITY OF EOMONDS. WASHINGTON CONTRACT PRICE BONDS) 39.533. EFFECTIVE DATE 05/I7,/7E (FOLD WERE WITHOUT PREJUDICING YOUR'RIGHTS OR AFFECTING OUR LIABILITY UNDER OUR BONDS) DESCRIBED ABOVE, WE WOULD APPRECIATE SUCH OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IS NOW AVAILABLE.. VERY TRULY YOURS, BY Richard W . Recob I* F CONTRACT COMPLETED, PLEASE STATE: APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMPLETION OF WORK (OR FINAL DELIVERY) APPROXIMATE ACCEPTANCE DATE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE S 2. IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED, PLEASE STATE: APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OR DOLLAR AMOUNT COMPLETED OR DELIVERED OF CONTRACT 3o DO YOU KNOW OF UNPAID BILLS FOR LABOR OR MATERIAL? (CHECK) YES NO 4. REMARKS: (IF ANY) SIGNATURE It is understood that the information contained herein is furnished as a matter of courtesy for the confidential use of the surety and is merely an expression of TITLE ' opinion. It is also agreed that in furnishing this information,no guaranty or warranty of accuracy or correctness is made and no responsibility is assumed as a result of reliance by the surety, whether such information is furnished by the owner or by an architect or engineer as the agent of the owner. DATE 19_ PLEASE RETURN INQUIRY TO: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND C315 Form 2 General Form Status Inquiry —Federal cases to be submitted 12 NCRTHUP CFF ICE CENTER in duplicate. Stamped addressed envelopes to be attached. 3101 NORIHUP WAY SI5541 0 BELLEVIVE9 WiASH1hGTCh 98004 , rUBLIC WORKS DEPARrM2U CHECKL1 . BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW �'gYV1 �R�► ���1 N� l��T' Date 26-m 0Address Street Right -of -Way Existing 01,r0 d REQD } Access Easements Existing t) lf�jr REQD Utility Easement Existing REQD �• Lot per Subdivision Plat Assessor Map 0 Site Plan Checked for Accuracy Z -Underground Wiring Reqd. Check Accuracy of Legal Description 1244299 w Environmentally Sensitive Area jC7 w Environmental Checklist Reqd. �,: tj HFlood Hazard Zone c, Shoreline Management Area Z Slope, Soil, Vegetation Stream, Creek, Drainage Basin N Existing Zoning Per Code �j G Anmities.Design Board Approval Reqd. N ADB Approval Board of Adjustment Approval Reqd. Review By: P-) Date: 6124/178 Existing Water Main Size water Main Reqd. Service Trine w �Reqd. Hydrant Size ExistM Hydrant Reqd. Per Fi e Size c Meter Reqd. Cross Connection Inspection Fire Department Comments Water Meter Charge Reqd. review by: Date: bepzic i uesign tipprovea uare: Septic Tank Pe Reqd. Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Avail Proj. Drawing No . 0. w - Side Sewer Availability w Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee v= Review By: Date: a TC�Y.,Cat.'ch Ditch Existing Reqd. rt Basin Req Indicate on Site Plander draina= -au llection on Swale open runoff u-alole regd, ate on Site Plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Re��c� 1.aZa Street Pav qd. H Curb and Gutter Req . w Sidewalk Reqd. w Curb Cut for Driveway c� Right-of�ay-�traction Permit Reqd. E, Bond qd. for Public Improvements Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Signing Reqd. Q. Pre Pen -Lit Site Inspection made on z r a BY: SS E'ER H U w w WATER a. '-' STREET H ENGINEERING . '4 Special Requirements listed in mem to Commmity Development Department, Building Division BY Date o All items filled in on Building Permit Application a BY Date L a' Drawings Stamped and Notations Made w BY Date Approved by Public Works Department Revised: Iv 10-1977 w BUILDING DEPARTMENT Applicant Fill USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER PERMIT APPLICATION Inside Heavy Lines JOB ADDRESS NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS). Y SUBDIVISION NO.. P LAT NAME ASSESSOR MAP NO. / L4g�4� Q, RZf L W MAILING ADDRESS l30 - Z.t o�� 0 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER ORDINANCE NO. �© CITY ELEPHONE NUMBER �� W 77 EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY I7, // PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY 6_10 NAME zU /, �Q-�/� /-L L.� ��c�, DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY 10 . fff��� � �7CJ N F ADDRESS 1 STREET/UTILITY WORK REQUIRED EYES [I NO Ir Z u 40,1, /� f✓� - / PERMIT FOR WORK IN PUBLIC R/W EYES ❑ NO UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED ❑YES ONO 3 _U C CITY rIL EEPHONE7NUMBER �//// / s -G 7 CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER DYES RNO SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQUIRED ❑YES NNO J m d NAME � � � G/J� , SEPTIC TANK PERMIT NO. 0 ADDRESS Q �7 ��G�,�/��� / A �. Lr LL .� 7 Li ��/ �/ IITVVELLEPHONE SEE MEMO DATED 0 u� O �`/� X COT NUMBER REMARKS o rCI:26 i 04- 9��s-Z /-88s-s800 N U STATE LICENSErNUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBER CHECKED BY 223o/3v06 Le Le al Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE ptn Gov't. Lot 2, Sec. 23, T27y, R3E W z F margin of SR 104 & thence E to W line of REMARKS 2nd Ave.; thence NELY to intersection w' S line of J.aines St.; thence WTLY alg S SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW AD NO. U ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT N /� thence SELY along said Ely margin to the o J REMARKS Q W J VARIANCE OR CU PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS LOT COVERAGE NEW RESIDENTIAL EIGAS LINE FRONT SIDE REAR FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT SIGN NON-RESIDENTIAL11:1 ❑ ADD DEMOLISH El RETAINING ❑ SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT WALL ❑ ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE OR FILL ❑ ( X FT) REQUIRED ❑ YES ❑ NO GROUP LOAD PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY PRE -MOVE swim REPAIR INSP. El POOL OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. NUMBER OF STORIESJO UMBER OF REMARKS WELLING �� Z NITS W NATURE OF WORK TO B_E//9O NE '11 tC Q PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION0 FEE Z 0 F z PROPOS SELJ /- Q riC i'L- rd t d PLOT PLAN IINDICATE BVILDING SETBACKS, M ABUTTING STREETS) BUILDING tl W O /� �� �Q--G L� PLUMBING ' MECHANICAL m O 0 // C' A // /�, /yf W FENCE > F SIGN Z f RETAINING WALL f 0 U SWIMMING POOL -'-- j; Reid;. Middleton and Assoses, Inc. �� Y 1LEEV#� olT ��31�1�1��17u`�`t.�d - Engineers *Surveyors •Planners - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 ` Phone 775.3434 TO C I ty of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter DATE 22 May 8 JOB NO. ATTENTION Edmonds Bldg. Dept. RE. Grading Plan for Alaska Maq. T Parking Area REQU�ST FOR GRADING PERMIT IjOXAttached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: jX Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 21 May 8 Parking Area Grading Plan for Alaska Magazine P I THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X(For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints W( For review and comment AS CANN AS FOSS I BtE ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS- If You have any questions please contact our office_ - 2 3 19.78 COPY TO P I a.nn' v I SIGNED: PORN 240-2 - Avallablo Ir— C TOMMO a, Moa. 01400 It enclosures are . not as noted, kindly notify us at once. A l 1 a n ' R . Mo . O 777 t_ - _ 3 C 4 A \I W _ o. a5 _ 20W 4Proposed Grade Exist. Grade _ i 2 n d AV E FLU E as 15 _. . DSO b1 i . 0 1+00 NOT E.* ;Est ma.t.eclFi;11�sReyuired 90.bA � ,4 7 OFC.ti.ay4.d 5. Fo'r Poop`o"s�e�d' Park9i�nfgFArwa O Y 1 (020 c c `o S v 8 o� cc. W o Proposed Grade w `Tap i8so 15 =� _wR Exist. Grade P R 0 P 0 S; D I+O 0 T;EMPORARY40 Y PA � � �cr a � ALLEY Q W W Proposed Grade 15 Exist. Grade I + QO I O s - l T6 _fit. S o I e to n o Inv.13.81 �� TY-PIC•AL SECTIONS CITY 0 Ex. Conc. Sidewalk >;CAL E= Horiz- I'= 30, P. W. DEPT. ENGINE op �} "Q Vert. 1 " ='.5 MAY 2 3 197 EXAMINE WASH. STATE FERRY BY DATE � HOLDING LANES - - PARKING G R PLAN FOR REMARKS — BENCH MARK: Top Exist.Mi No.3in Alley Way North AREA A .D I N G. A N of JAMES STREET Elev.19.78 ALASKA. MAGAZINE PROJECT ' SC A L E I "= 30' DAT U M: M.L.L.W. ' PLAN L I�. i�Cl�, 1'�Q40ClQtP,Q. g KC, ENGINEERS . SURVEYORS • PLANNS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 oEs. A.R. M. DATE2J M oy 78FILE NO. 7 0 2 O f 3 SHEET I OF I °R A. R. M. F B 441 CH- R.R. S. SCALE As Noted i RLRSHR HORTHWEST PURLISHInG COMPHP November 29, 1979 Mayor Harve Harrison City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Harve: Vern Behm will be in Council chambers next week re application for permits to complete paving our parking lot across James Street from the office. Since I am returning to Angoon for a few weeks I won't be there, but hope we are all on target that since we are not a retail business, or will we be adding any personnel or traffic to the James Street stub beside our administrative offices, we see no reason for sidewalks or additional street improvements beyond those we have already accomplished with several heavy courses of gravel. We will be following the hoped for favorable reaction to the parking lot permit with appli- cations for permits to extend the administrative building, two floors with. executive offices on top. James Street will still have no additional traffic and we think the improvements, along with proper landscaping, will be a big improve- ment over past appearances without further street improvements in the way of paving and sidewalks. Hope things go smoothly I couldn't catch you on RAH:smb ALASKA' magazine The MILEPOST' The Alaska Journal ° Alaska Geographic Book Department Best regards and sorry the phone this afternoon. Sincerely, h0115�ert A. Henning President Alaska Northwest Publishing Co. 130 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 206/774.4111 Wit. - rt -- 1 -� - - - ---1---� I � I I -tt -� - - -- � -- 4-+A, -- -( - �-�- - - - -- I I I IL 1U, - ll - - - - - -- - -- - - f ( � I i - - - - I I I 1 i- ALLEY 29ot#M1;, I 1t l As 1 1 i t�,t I v. 14 E x ConC. Site Wa l It Ex. C. 0. Top It.02 WA SW STATE PERRY NOLDIN6 LANE$ BENCH MARK; Tol of. El C J� L E I "= 30, D, PLAN •j Grade Exist. Grade U 0 NOTE Estimated Fill Required 470 cu.ydl, x For Proposed ParklagArea r, ?' k ftopossd Grado Exist. Grade PROPosfc a TEMPORARY; a Lai vi . 17. I+OO RECEtiu � AUG'17 pUWI-C VjOiKS Udil" PA R K. I N S 8 a Ac • [AR E-1 vp 8 a+ / / A Cr0✓r'� .2���o,./m�k fSe+vrtr f PropORsd Grad! N 4oJ0J 11A �s .Sffise�i�sq G!os= dsr+ior '` j �, Exist. Grads s i :.. Q I+QO $T-P1,CAL SECTIONS Vert. I T'ar/�i �eT. cr�'ito�ii � Exist.W No.3in AlleyWoy'North PARKING A I AEG R a f N G PUA' N FOR JAMES STREET 'ECT7UM • M.L.L.W.n is eOALrti%. A6. A"WAGAZINE PROJ can. A.R. M. DAT621M ay 7a FILM NO. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS- • PLANNERS DR• A. R. M. F.e. 441 70 20 ON F , 324 Main Stnrt Ednwndr, Weshingtoe 90020 GN• R.R. S . 9"A' LE As Noted tsma r I or I r RECEI��`� r AUG Z 7 1978 ., Public Works tjtp'•. Exist. "2 nd A1(E hL1J E w -- 1+00 NOTE Esilmatod fill Rsgir 470 cu . �a For+Rropose4 PorihQA►tial �f 90.0 • ,P ;^ A�. W Fiopo-sed (rode W p Kc Exist. Erode at T tj ,., '� T E M!O R A R r: f 8 a 8 ro A R•i~ lS } r Q O a ALLEY' ! 1r{%"' Grw or,� `o ce Sc�.a� W ti P rdp O soot Erode y •w` /If J/ 4 .N�QA� Cer 4. i�iV y l �e s� 4L5 ;yd,sL *,,I edi Ou¢t' t`sxist. erode .p 1� IS rz, °;r Qrar.✓�� 3��66a��ec.. Ilk �, --r---, 1. ,� T`Y;P'i A L SECT 10 N S Inv. 1 .:1 �t Ex. 'Conc. SidRwolk Ex. C. 4, ' Vert. 1 Too 1?.02 "WASH. BUT IF F E ltAYG-�co%; .3�..rr..�ie�.ul• HOLDING LAKES -'PARKING AREA' G R A I N G P�.A N FOR BENCHMARK -.Top Exist.Mi N0.3io AlleyWoy!Notth of Elev.JAMES 19-7$ STREET Elev. ALAS.KA. MAGAZINE PROJECT 9., SCALE 1 30' DAT U M i M.L.L.W. PLAN �y 94GIN MS • SURV FORS • KANNERS 3x4 M.in$tr,.t •' Edau,+rdr.'W.shinq+on 98020 DRS. A.R. M. DAT6ti M oY 78 Fit_E NO. 7 � � � S ft+UT I OF i ow q, R M '`'n' 44t CN. R.R. S. SCALE As Noted a Z 0 w F- U 1% O w 71 T CITY QF EDMONDS Permit No. 91 �i(3MNIUNITY SERVICES DEPARTIA9 E T .p N PERMIT —'a ail RIGHT-OF-WAY- CONSTRUCTION R � � Issue Date iQ41 A. • Owner: C. A L\n(? aV: ' ailing Address rv�0t,-)o5 W1-\ . G Qc c--) City State Zip Mailing Address City State Zip �aQ' State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: r 707 tiD Q '!;:- C Type of Work to be Done: 1-2C7 D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ` ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: to Y ❑ N F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his . signature to this application, agrees to hold the City, of Edmonds harmless from anyinjuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever; forseen of unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND. MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City. Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end.of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and- that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: - �" Date: • 1Owner or Contractor .' This' PerrnWN[ust be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY- PERMIT FEE: 30 . ftD _ ? Time Authorized: Void - after- I`J days. Restoration Fee: Special Conditions: NA Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: — Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY: Date INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div: March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES F (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) '4, .1 , Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 l;6 2-ND A TGVY L L" PVL LONDVCT FX,157 t=L. MTD CA. TVED— — TEL, PE D. — — - - I Exi S7. 1,_, Z„ wc: I U GUNC�U IT �6 l 41 I NISTAkL'L l 4U (4-- - _S'oo P3 UL LA IPI EXIST. LoiVDUIT I TEL- I I I� INST/-\LL ZbNLkL7E 1 lw 'FLU S 4 MTD. p ED., W.1 FL8 C-2- LITE- LtD PUO YAULT Q J i AMGS 57. ; CI Ybf Edmo: D� p T . OF: WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT n J GI�tCC' % !�- .Permit Number: jpl'.�1CISICA.: � Issue.Daie: A _Address or Vicinity of Construction: 130 • . 2 .Avenue. South' r 8 �. o B.. Type of.Work (lie specific) Ins tall 2" 'PE IP Main. in. 2. Avenues- South .. i 9 0 1.9 from' 101South: to 186'. South centerline';16` A11`ey. .` der Attached Drawing:..910=452.(. C.. Contractor: Washington Natural Gas 'Cornpany ,Contact: Gary Swanson Mailing Address:- 815 :Mercer... Street,: Phone'' 224-2080 Seattle WA 98111 . .. i. State License #: > Liability Insurance: •"'Bond: $ .... D. Building Permit # (if applicable): ` Side Sewer'Permit # (if. applicable) E. ❑ Commercial El 'Subdivision 0, Cat Pro ect D Utilit' Pup'; G EC G CABLE WATER): z, 0 Multi -Family ❑ Single FariEly E Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: RoY`: VV : _k F. Pavement or Concrete Cut':. ®.Yes �No (7).G: Size of Cut: 2 . x 4 H. Charge $•'': ddPP QQ((d� Water, `4@ Main APPLICANT T6UNI " NI) SIGi�7 -INDEMNITY:. ' Applicant understands and.by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of.Edihonds harmless from_ injuries, damages,:or claims of any:kind or. description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen; that may,, a mwA .fgainst`hty of rJionds,.or any of its departments or employ ees, including or not limited to the defense of any.legal.proceedings'iriclttding_defense costs,' and 7torney e s by mason -of granting this permit. , THE CON7RACTOR'IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MA • R1A• _ FOR A PE OD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION ; AND ACCEPTANCE OF, 77IE WORK. ES77MA7Eb•RESTORATTON FEESW[LL BE HELD UN77L THE;FIAAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED B:Y CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A.DEBIT.OR'CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED'F.OR;ISSUiINCE TO THE APPLICANT j. Construction drawing of proposed work required -with permit application:.• A 24, hour notice.is .required for inspection,' .Please calk thee_j. Engim' r►ng Department- 771-3202. Work is to be inspected during progress and at eomple ion `` Restoration is'to.be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall. be' kept 'clean at all times. j TraW-Control. and Public.Safety.shall be in: accordance with City regulations as,regwred kiy'the City, ngineer... rt,: .All street 'cut ditches shalhbe.patched,with asphalt,or Cityapproved material," prior to'the end of the.•working'day; . NO EXCEPTIONS: I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements mid the:pink COR of the permu will beavailable on site at all times for i s ect'on purposes Signature:..' Date., october 31, : 1991 " z (Contractor or Agent)' ' CALL;DIA&A.=DIG' PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: R RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT: TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER S dN 101 DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 01 tom. PA ►J GV T COMMENTS: DATE: :. NO WORK; SHALL DISRUPTION FEEIFUND I11; RESTORATION FEE: {j PERMIT FEE: '3 D ti`s l�-p QM O dQ TOTAL FEE: RECEIPT NO:: n ISSUED BY:r+ �T `IN PRIOR ,TU PERM'IT: ISSUANCE F.naro Div 'IQ0 it -1 a AIIIZ 0 il'6 C2,02XI'e-D -t .. M. L-Oz- Ir- i IT 1 &.4 cop i:,- �11 j C& ?w_ Eta IT. ( tf- fw- I F" t-U►IAJ - 90-f t-v, I? Lzcoorrv-, AAA- LKI I 1,900 - 4,Z+, 45�56; 5 44 LAY AL- L- 4. t&14KO-L(.. 9MM \fj I V-1 I 1z S, Oez�Q f Ocev, 5;, " ve i -ZOAJ -TAJ- I LeINZ41A.Ict- r-r-OM U— Irie-AIV, --r OAJ D (0 4"a 17' 'W_(Z 'ILL -"'F t—NiA7!=:;iAL isu . -',-frncITj I AJ, Ito-4-15-z, ts 49 470, RECEIVED 6 A I Ir 2 19�4 9O. A'. 6�d, PUBLIC WORKS /P06/711-11.�1 August 23/84 Mr. Robert A. Henning n TF?fr Editor & Publisher `� f�� � ILAlaska Northwest Publishing Company 130 Second Ave. South Edmonds, Wash. Dear Mr. Henning: FIle RECEIVED A U G 27 1884 Executive Offices I am.writing to request that you consider contr- ibuting a certain section of your property to the city of Edmonds for park purposes. This area in Edmonds is like an oasis in our prosperous little town. This should not be a picnic area but an accomodation to the local people using well placed benches and seating facilities shaded against rain and sun. Rest rooms are al- ready within reach, not more than ten yards distance which is, and has been city managed. Ferry traffic will look favorably to this stop awaiting their transportation across the sound. You will benefit by this memorial in your name.. It is up to the attornies and auditors to.allow you tbe.benefits og tax write-off and an escape of the responsibility of up -keep and care you have always maintained. The mayor, r[r. Naughten enth- ustically commits himself to the promotion of this project and recognizes the value of this strip of ground to the city. Once lost as a park of useful beauty, he felt it would be lost forever. My personal ambition to gain your concern is to benefit the city. Secondly, to maintain the value of our pro- perty across the street and even areas beyond. You might remember me as the one who wrote to you each time at Christmas.in apprec- ition of your beautiful seasonal decorations on this very area. It can be a yearly,, twelve montha beauty spot. A park of the planned sort would enhance Edmonds reputation for flowers and cared for beauty spots. Hoping you accept the thoughts expressed. Since ply yo}ars, Wm. C. Rast CC: Lary Naughten, Mayor of Edmonds t _ r1� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �. i4- Introduction: The State Environmental Policy.Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to'consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment' The purpose .of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following ques.tions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations.of.your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government. decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided; or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports.or studies of which you are F'w aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those' questions now wi.11 help all ' agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal_ for which approval is sought. Your answers should include.the impacts that will be caused'by,your proposal, when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork:in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal... If a question does not apply, just answer it "not. applicable" (N/A) and continue on -to the next question. . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. AArvcDniinin 1. Name of Proponent Alaska IKaaazine 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 130 2nd South.' Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone 774 4111 3. Date Checklist Submitted November 14, 1979 4. Agency Requiring Checklist planning department, City oS 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design, elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: Landscaped parking lot 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal,'as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of -the environmental setting of the proposal): At the foot of Tams Street acros8 from Alaska Maga7.ing offices. Bounded on the west by Highway and ferry holding: 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal February 1980. 9. List.of all Permits, Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for'all Propo.$al (federal, state, and local — including rezones): 10, Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this .proposal? If yes, explain. no 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. - no 12. Attach any other application form thath.as been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE N0- 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes X in.geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion. X of soils, either on.or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or'erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or'the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: ormJ displacement d e9mPaGti96f the-8eiml will occur due to the nature of the devel apt -went 'the site essentially complete only finish grading is needed .. 2. Air. Will the proposal result,in a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate., either locallyc or regionally? X Explanation: it is PxIeCi-e3 that a mini.nial niint 09 dust ii1 3 jae generated by cars entering and Px; f i n" nrnr92��z�d facility. During only be temporar 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? X -2- YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? y X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved.oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow.of ground waters? g: Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through.interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or. other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x Explanation: Due to the nature of this r3PVPlnnPmPni- compaction Of the soils will change the absorption rates as well as paving the parking area. -The on --site storm water detention system_ will mitigate oils, from vehicles, entering and deteriorating the ground waters. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species; or numbers of any species of flora (in - eluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of .the numbers of any unique; rare, or endangered species Of flora? X c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? x _ d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural drop? X Explanation: Landscaping will add diversity and introClure new species. Nothing is there now except crushed rock surface.- -3- YES MAYBE NO 5.. Fauna. WI11 the proposal result in: a, Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land.animals.including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species X of fauna? c.- Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier .to the migration or movement of fauna? x d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?- X Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: Construction noise levels will be intermittantly high during construction, i. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: ' It is anticipated that this parkinq area will be used primarily during day light working hours, however, during the winter months, headlights Clare:could be anticipated. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal.result• in the alteration of the present or planned land.use of an area? X Explanation: Presently used as a temporary, gravel parkiftq lot. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? X b. Depletion of any nonrenewable X natural resource? Explanation: M. Risk of.Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: 11. _Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing using, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: .a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand fo'r new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems?* .d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e.. Alterations to waterborne, railor air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor' vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x x -5- YES, MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or.altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X. b.. Police protection? X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities?- X e. Maintenance of public facilities; including roads? X f. Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of X energy, or require -the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a nee or new systems or alterations to the following utiliti.es: a..Power or natural gas? X b., Communications systems?. X c. Water? X A. Sewer or septic.tanks.? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: On site storm water detention sysfpM ham hpan ; nrwb_-L d and.aproved under original proposal. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health.hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics: Will.the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista. or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation.of an aesthetically offensive site.open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site,.structure, object or building? Explanation: MAYBE AO x x x C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my -knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. n PROPONENT: Vernon M. Behm -7- AdOL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD GENERAL INFORMATION I. The ADB meets the first Wednesday of every month at 7:30 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers. The Board is composed of five design professionals and two lay citizens. The Board is charged with review of all construction projects, except single family dwellings. In analyzing each application, the ADB is guided by a number of considerations, including: . 1. Quality.of building design and.its relationship to the environment; 2. Compatibility of buildings and structures with the Edmonds.Policy Plan; 3. Compatibility of height and scale of each structure with others in the vicinity and with the site; 4. Harmony in texture, lines, color, and masses of buildings; 5. Landscaping and the transition to adjoining properties; 6. Provision of pedestrian facilities and public spaces. II. EXHIBITS. All exhibits filed in connection with.a pending project become the property of the City and will not be returned. III. A Building Permit'must be applied for within one year from the date of the approval, or the application shall become null and void. Reasonable time extensions may be granted by the Board if applications are submitted prior to the expiration -date: IV. APPEALS. Appeals from the ADB are made to the City council by filing., within ten days of final action, a w-kitten Notice of Appeals with the City Clerk. Appeals of the decision of the City Council shall be made within ten days of the date of the decision, by commencing action in Snohomish County Superior Court for a writ of certiorari or review. GENERAL PROCEDURE I. Complete the. attached application and file it with.the Planning Division. It is advisable to review your proposed plans with the Planning Staff. II. ADB applications for all major projects must be accompanied by an Environmental Checklist and Assessment. A minimum of 15 working days (3 weeks) is necessary for their review. Therefore, any application for a major project must be sub- mitted at least three weeks before the ADB meeting. All other project applica- tions must be submitted 14 days (2 weeks) before the meeting for review. III. Often questions are raised at the meeting which require a committment by the applicant. Therefore, it is important that the applicant or a representative, empowered to make such commitments, Is present, If no representative is in attendance, the Board may either set the item for hearing at a later date or act upon the item as it is presented, in which case the applicant would not have an opportunity to respond. IV. It is suggested that early conceptual plans be submitted for preliminary review of major projects. Final building plans must be submitted for final approval. Final landscaping plans may be submitted after site work has begun. Installation of landscaping in accordance with approved landscape plans become a condition of final approval and no occupancy permit will be issued until that work is completed. V. Construction work must followthe ADB.approved plans. If there are modifications, to the approved plans, they must be submitted to the Planning Division for review (12/78) and action. A stop work order may be placed on a project that is not following the approved plans, and a delay in the issuing of the occupancy permit may result. CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD APPLICATION For application to the Amenities Design Board, the following items must be submitted: (1) Completed application form; including property owners within 80 feet. (2) Exhibits: *** Three (3) prints of all preliminary and/or final drawings to scale. Any modifi- cations to approved plans must also be submitted. The applicant or representative should contact the Planning Division (775-2525) for consultation as to which of the following items shall be required in connection with the application. All of the required information must be submitted prior to ADB review. Check, below which of the items have been submitted. (a) PLOT PLAN I. All property lines. 2. Setback lines. 3. All structures, - existing and proposed, to be indicated in scale. 4. Existing trees, size, location, and type,.including the existing grade at base. 5. Driveways and off street parking, including curbing, surfacing material, stall size, aisle widths, and traffic direction. 6. Screening of all exterior trash enclosures, loading areas, etc. 7. Public improvements, including streets, curbs, gutters, street lighting and sidewalks. 8., Existing contours, proposed contours, and a drainage plan. (b) BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1. All elevations pertinent to application. 2. Type and color of exterior materials. 3. Height. 4. Screening of roof -based mechanical equipment. (c) LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. Type�and location of existing and proposed shrubs and trees. 2. Initial size of all plant material (by height). 3-Fencing, including height, location, and style (use of material). 4. Recreation area (multi -family residential). (d) SIGNING 1. Size, shape, and exact location of all existing and proposed signs (interior and exterior). 2. Colored sketch of all proposed signs. 3. Materials (wood, plastic, metal, etc.}. 4. Type of illumination. 5. Cross-section of entire parcel illustrating any proposed free-standing sign in proper relation to the structure it is designed to serve. 6. Plot plan plus structures (see a3). (e) LIGHTING PLAN I. Lot lighting, including location of fixtures, style of fixtures, and intensity of light. 2. Any structure illtimination,'including location of fixtures., style of fixtures, and intensity of light. (12/78) CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION to the ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD DATE 11-13-79 FILE # SITE PLAN BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS LANDSCAPE PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL DATA Receipt # SIGN EXHIBITS (3). PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER: HEARING DATE OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE Alaska. Magazine PHONE 774-4111 ADDRESS ! 30 Second Avenue South Edmonds, WA ZIP CODE . 9 80 20 CONTACT PERSON .'Alaska Macrazine PHONE 774 4111 ADDRESS 130 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, WA ZIP CODE 98020 ARCHITECT/DESIGNER Behm Architects PHONE775 2731 PROPERTY ADDRESS Second and James ZONING BC LEGAL DESCRIPTIONThat _portion of Govern. Lot Z , sec 23, T 27 N. R3E W.M. beginning at the E. margin of SR 104 & the south line said Gov't. Lot 2; Thence Northeasterly to the intersection Wtge S.. line ot James .; PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: thencetwesterly along the S. line of James St. to easterly margin SR104; thence southwesterly 1. A ag: Pin& — Preliminary x Final al ona said existing margin to the Parking Lot Site Plan x Landscape PEE ei pointE4JvA?g�pning 2. Sign Elevations Site Plan Landscape Plan 3. Modification of previous approval for temporary use of parking area. EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Temporary parking lot. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL . Th,, final gracli n$, and ra3.1 � nark; r►n lot as shown r)n attached 'c3rawin2. APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT NnvPmher 1979 ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK February 1980 I (we) hereby certify to the best of my (our) knowledge, that the statements and information contained herein are, in all respects, true and correct. (Signature of Applicant) Vernon M. Bohm 12/78 • CITY OF EDMONDS PROJECT #E Parking Lot ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED 11/13/79 The information on this form will be used.to determine the effect of your action upon the environment of the City of Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible. 1. LAND Area 0.44 Ac Soils Type AIIP,-�ti,��d Limitations none Description of topography (% slope) 1 - 2% we_�t P rly NOTE: If grading or filling will Grading:Estimated cubic yards less lo0 d �_ exceed 500 cubic yards a grading y y and filling plan must be sub - Filling: Estimated' cubic yards less 100 yds. mitted with the application. Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) 13,116 square feet_` T S Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) 13,116 square feet 2. WATER Stream - Estimated flow (cu.bic feet.per second) N/A Will' stream be altered? na If yes, td what degree? Other water bodies? no Impact on storm drainageStorm water Det.Method of handling runoff no System Adjacent to shorelines zone? 3. VEGETATION Type and approximate number of trees Within 200 feet of MHHW? none Minimum diameter of trees to remain % of trees to be removed Ground cover Grass only % to be removed Ion-, Proposed landscaping, if any see landscapingja l an for parking let 4. EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Multi - Vacant Family Family Commercial Other North x Street South x East x Street West ST Highway 5. CIRCULATION Holding lane Estimated increase in"auto trips daily none Availability.of public transportation no change 6. AREA OF IMPACT Neighborhood x City-wide 7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY none 8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION none Regional ( construction noise levels). JAMES.iH. REID LEROY F. MIDDLE -TON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON Rea, 4"oa4 a of 47qc, ENGINEERS •SURVEYORS •PLANNERS Edmonds, Washington i Ever.ett, Washington Branch Office • 1619 Pacific Avenue o Everett, Washington 98201 • 259.5511 �,Irf� �.• 0 t April, 1978 File No. 7020B �02 Page 1 of 2 STORM RETENT1014 - DETENTION CALCULATIONS NAL �� _ PROPOSED PARKING LOT FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE 2ND & JAMES STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Existing Conditions Slope -� 2-3% Westerly Site Condition - Grass Field Area to be developed = 0.32 Acre Existing' Runoff Coefficient = 0.20 Time to Concentration Tc = L/(V)(60) + 10 140/ (1 125) (60) + 10 = 11.9 min. Intensity = i = 1.7 in/hr. @ 10-year frequency. Seattle Curve. Q Existing = CIA = (0.20)(1.7)(0.32) = 0.11 c.f.s. Q Allowable = 0.11 t Using the Yrjanainian & Warren Method for small retention basins. Qo = Allowable Outflow Acreage x Future Runoff C 1 a Future C 0.85 f Therefore! Qo = 0.11 (0.32)(0. 5 Using orifice outlet condition T = -25 + 1762/Qo = -25 + 1762/ 0 ~1 = 41.37 min. = 0.40 c.f.s./Acre C CITY OF EDMONDS P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV: EXAMINED BY DATE pip REMARKS �V_ MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & MARINAS • PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 0 FEASIBILIT), STUDIES -.. so" Vs = 2820T _ 40 Qo T +i 2 5 (2820) (41.37) _ E+0 (.4) (41.37) 1 37 + 25 1095.8 ft3 per acre C Vtotal = V� x Acre x Future C = 1095.8 x 0.32 x 0.85 f = 298 ft3 ✓. Detention Volume Required = 298 ft3 1 Sizing Retention System Install 95?L.F. 24" Galy. 14 Gal. CMP C 0.50% @ 3.14 ft3/L.F. = 298.3 ft3 a I Sizing Orifice Q Allowable = 0.11 c.f.s. Q = CdA l 2gh Solving for A; i A= Cd Q g - Where h= 2.5' cd = o.62, 0.11 0.11 A = _ (0.62) (64.4)(2.5) 7.8669 0.01398 ft2 1.6 in. orifice Use 1.6" Dia. orifice '� April, 1978 File No. 7020E Page 2 of 2 LIMES H. REID . LE 0Y F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES LLOYD H. NELSON ^ear . - fM ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Edmonds. Washington Everett, Washington Branch Office • 1619 Pacific Avenue • Everett, Washington 98201 • 259.5511 April, 1978 File No. 7020B Page 1 of 2 STORM RETENTION - DETENTION CALCULATIONS PROPOSED PARKING LOT FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE 2ND 6 JAHES STREET, EDMONDS, WASH INGTON Existing Conditions Slope - 2-3.% Westerly Site Condition - Grass Field �`��y t Area to be developed = 0.32 Acre P( . , j , Existing"Runoff Coefficient = 0.20- Time to,'Concent ra t i on Tc = L/ (V) (60) + 10 140/ 0 125) (60) + 10. = 1 1 .9 min. Intensity = i = 1.7 in/hr.. @ 10-year frequency. Seattle CL-rve. Q Existing = CIA = (0.20)(1.7)(0.32) = 0.11 c.f.s. Q Allowable =.0.11 1 Using the Yrjanainian 6 Warren Method for small retention basins. Qo = Allowable Outflow Acreage x Future Runoff C Future C = 0.85 Therefore.Qo = 0.11 0.32 0. 5 Using orifice outlet condition T = -25 + 1762/Qo = -25 + 1762/0.40 = 41.37 min. 0.40 c.f.s./Acre C CITY OF EDMONDS P. V!. DEFT. ENGIi'lEEIRING DIV. EXALIHI dED BY Cr1TE RZMARKS I.tL;'.ICIPA.; ENCINEER INC, • %VATER SUPPLY • WAS1E TREATMENT • SURVEYS C, C A D A S T R A L ENCIr:EERINC AIKFCn^T P'/•(.;.; !i(' .. I, (. • t.1'Ni+lr'A` • 1 Aprll, 1978 File No. 7020B Page 2 of 2 Vs = 2820T T + 25 _ 40 Qo T _ (2820)(41.37) _ 40 (.4)(41.37) T41. 37 + 25 = 1C95.8 ft3 per acre C Vtotal = Vs x Acre x Future C = 1095.8 x 0.32 x 0.85 = 298 ft3 Detention Volume Required = 298 ft.3 , Sizing Retention. System �^ Install 95 L.F. 24" Galy. 14 Gal. CMP C 0.50% @ 3.14 ft3/L.F. = 298.3 ft3 Sizing Orifice Q Allowable = 0.11 c.f.s. Q =. CdA! 2gh— Solving for A; Q A = Cd g - Where h = 2.5' cd = 0.62,. 0.11 0.1T A (0.62) (64.4)(2.5) 2 0.01398 ft 1.6 in. orifice Use 1.6" Dia. orifice M. r+MES H. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C. WAYNE JONES .. w .-._.. �..�.-..�..� �.- .._.. ten.. LLOYD, H. NELSON ,y Rea, 40 04• Iota, %ota, ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Edmonds, Washington' Everett, Washin"g"ton -� r Branch Office • 1619 Pacific Avenue • Everett, Washington 98201 • 259.5511 F i le No. • 70206 FN Page 1 of 2 STORM RETENTION - DETENTION CALCULATIONS PROPOSED PARKING LOT FOR. ALASKA MAGAZINE 2ND & JAMES STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON . Existing Conditions Slope - 2-3% Westerly Site Condition - Grass Field Area to be developed = 0.32 Acre Existing Runoff Coefficient = 0.20 Time to Concentration Tc = L/(V)(60) + 10 140/(1125)(60) + 10 = 11.9 min. Intensity = i = 1.7 in/hr. @ 10-year frequency. Seattle Curve. Q Existing = CiA = (0.20)(1.7)(0.32) = 0.11 c.f.s. Q Allowable = 0.11 \ t Using the Yrjanainian & Warren Method for small retention basins. Qo = Allowable Outflow Acreage x Future Runoff C ' Future C 0.85 Therefore Qo = 0.11 0-32)(0-85) Using orifice outlet condition T = -25 + 1762/Qo = -25 + 1762/0.40 = 41.37 min. 0.40 c.f.s./Acre C CITY OF EDMONDS P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV. EXAMINE BY. G�% DATEy�� REMAR MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING & [', SIGN 0 MARINAS 0 PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT • FEASIBILITY STUDIES April, 1978 Fi le No.. 7020B Page 2 of:2 Vs = 2820T - 40 Qo T T. +'25 (2820)(41.37) _ 40 (.4)(41.37) + :3 + 25 1 G95.8 f t3 pe r acre C Vtotal Vs x Acre x Future C 1695.8 x 0.32 x 0.85 = 298 ft f Detention Volume Required = 298 ft3 Sizing Retentlor. System Install 95 L.F. 24" Galy. 14 Gal. CMP C 0.50% @ 3.,14 ft3/L.F. = 298.3 ft3 Sizing Orifice Q Allowable' = 0.11 c.f.s. Q = CdA V 2gh Solving for A; A = Q .r Where h 2.5' Cd g Ed = 0.62, 0.11 0.11 A '(0.62) (64.4) (2.5) 7.8669 0.01398 ft2 1.6 in. orifice Use 1.6" Dia. orifice ; f 1�_,1AMES f1. REID LEROY F. MIDDLETON C: WAYNE JONES LLOYD H.NELSON 1 ` - Using orifice outlet condition T = -25 + 1762/Qo = -25 + 1762/0.40 = 41.37 min. Rea, !d I f *74c. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS Edmonds, Washington , Everett, Washington 1 Branch Office • 1619 Pacific Avenue • Everett, Washington 98201 • 259.5511 del Sr `- `'�) ; Agri l , 1978 fl, File No. 7020B Page 1 of 2 STORM RETENTION - DETENTION CALCULATIONS PROPOSED PARKING LOT FOR ALASKA MAGAZINE 2ND JAMES STREET, EDMONDS, WASHING,TON. . Existing Conditions Slope = 2-3% Westerly Site Condition - Grass Field Area to be developed = 0.32 Acre ExistingRunoff Coefficient = 0.20 Time to Concentration Tc = L/(V)(60) + 10 140/ (1125) (60) + 10` = 11.9 mi n. Intensity = i = 1.7•in/hr. @ 10=year frequency. Seattle Curve. Q Existing = CIA = (0.20)(1.7)(0.32) = 0.11 c.f.s. Q Allowab'le a 0.11 Using the Y,rjanainian 6 Warren Method for small retention -basins.. i Q ° = Allowable Outflow Acreage x Future Runoff C i Future C �= 0.85 Therefore Qo = ' 0.11 = 0.40 c.f.s./Acre C 0.32 0. T5TCITY OF EDMONDS P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV. EXAMINE;?- BY DATE _18REMARKSrev gegy ., 'IPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREATMENT • SURVEYS & CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AlkFORT PLANNING & nFSIGN * MARINAS • PORT & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT • FEASIBILITY STUDIES April, 1978 File No. 7020E Page 2 of 2 Vs = _2820T _ 40 Qo T 4 (2820)(41.37) _ _ 40 (.4)(41..37) - (41;.37)+ 25 = 1095•8_ft3 per acre C Vtotal = Vs x Acre x Future C = 1095.8 x 0.32 x 0.85 = 298 ft3 i Detention Volume Required = 298 ft3 Sizing Retention System 4 Install 95°1-.F. 24" Galy. 14 Gal. CMP C 0.50% @ 3.14 ft3/L.F. = 298.3 ft3 Sizing Orifice Q Allowable = 0.11 c.f.s. Q = CdA q 2gh- Solving for A; Q A = Cd g - Where h = 2.5' cd = 0.62, 0.11 ml A= _ (0.62) (64.4)(2.5) 7.8669 = 0.01398 ft2 1.6 in. orifice Use 1.6" Dia. orifice 'A Y fi • Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. January 16, 1981 File No. 7020C Engineers • Surveyors • Planners STORM WATER ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED EXPANSION TO ALASKA PUBLISHING BUILDING 130 - 2nd AVENUE SOUTH RECEIVED J AN 21 EDMONDS , WASHINGTON ou. ui Public Works Existing Site Condition Area 5760 ft.2 or 0.13 Ac. Site Condition Asphalt Conc, parking lot Slope westerly to Alley Way and James Street 2%+ There is localized ponding in southwest corner of parking are due to regrading of James Street and Alley Way in 1980, building will eliminate this condition. Existing Runoff Coefficient = 0.90 Future Site Condition Building roof area to cover existing parking lot. Runoff coefficient = 0.9 See RMA Plan Dated,20 April 1978 - 7020A for proposed improvements to Alley and James Street in connection with this expansion and improvement to James Street. Due to no change in runoff coefficients and runoff rates the impact of storm water to existing and proposed storm drainage facilities is insig- nificant. Therefore no detention is proposed. Q prt v IOUs dLA +e o 4-, cc w, ' r o Gxls+lV �/0� S14-- IS G-a-+C n t 10 11 LAJ I t Hew I CJ I bN �_• � cr V-p— Dir. Of Public Works 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Woshington 98020 (206) 775-3434 INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICiDIONS DATE 19 6 TO . / � FROM FOAM 41 - LITT LE'6 SUBJECT: 11 ,rAs E REID, MIDDL N & ASSOCIATE , NC. €ngineers - Surveyors - Planners 121 5th Avenue North Suite 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 Phone 775-3434 TO GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LIFOEa ors"TIUMSE T-ML DATE / JOB NO. O ATTENTION b Ic - r RE: I (.. �.� / l EGEWEn JAN 21 1981. DIr. Ut Public Works Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION � GC' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: X For approval El Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 4 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US n -. COPY TO SIGNED: FORM 240-2 Available from Ees Inc., Groton, Mass. 01450 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. lnC.189v July 3, 1997 CITY OF E `"'O' `DS BARBARA FAHEY 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 1 MAYOR COMMUNITY. SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works . Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering Craig Campbell 19400 - 33rd Ave W.,, Suite 200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Subject: Sunrise Assisted Living Access Points Dear Craig: Staff will support modifications for the Sunset Assisted Living project to allow passenger drop, in addition to the entry off Dayton Street, but cannot support the creation of an additional access point for delivery. vehicles.' Staff can supportthe creation of an entry/exit area off Second A a ue since an interim ordinance allows for reasonable accommodation. We would anticipate a number of individuals who would need drop-off service near the building because of disabilities. There is no similar basis for allowing a service delivery entrance off 2nd Avenue. There could be code changes to modify the code in additional ways prior to submittal of a complete application. Both the code section restricting access points and the interim ordinance establishing a reasonable accommodation are new and have not -been the subject of many staff decisions and of any appeals. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions. Sincerely, JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer JC W/sf SUNRISEL.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities"International — Hekinan, Japan Date: March 6, 1998 . To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: John Bissell, AICP, Senior Planner Subject: Parking Requirement @ Soundview Plaza, formerly Alaska Publishing (Building located at the N.W. corner of 2nd Ave S & James St.) Research indicates that the building located at the Northwest corner of the intersection of 2nd Ave S. & James St. was constructed with 2 parking stalls and a loading bay on site. Additionally, research indicates that the previous owner of the ,subject building voluntarily. added 36 parking stalls associated with this building on land owned by that individual, and located at the southwest corner of the intersection of 2nd Ave. S and James St. Those parking stalls are now described in a covenant and are located on two separate lots. Since the 36 stalls were provided voluntarily, the City cannot require the parking stalls unless the uses of the building change to require additional parking stalls. The previous uses of the building required one parking stall per 40.0 square'feet of office area, and two additional parking stalls for the residential dwelling unit. If the new uses in the building do not exceed those ratios, the City of Edmonds cannot require the retention of the additional parking stalls. The proposed T.I. currently under review as Soundview Plaza is not increasing the required parking stalls. Therefore, the Planning Division cannot require a covenant for the additional parking stalls. City of Edmonds cza Planning Division PLANNING DATA NAME: A�sol.-nies SITE ADDRESS: 130 - 2'DATE: &73/ V ZONING: PLAN CHK#: 9g'�- 232 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:41 lt!�I-C !:I w/ i`A- k-14 CORNER LOT (Yes/No) . FLAG LOT (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Front: Left Side:. Right Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: Maximum Allowed: Actual: BUILDING HEIGHT: � ►'� L'des�°' Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: Datum Point Datum Elevation: A.D.U. CREATED?: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #: SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT AREA: OTHER: Plan'Review By: c:Af ilu\ptmiiMpiandadoc OJT ( �zs b7o - l 9Co8 w-a f a: 3 srapq V N� , A(arftTo _Fr _ acl� - �-fir-- --- _.------_�_ - . _W-(4 vtecar�� ---•'���.th_ - - -- ----- - - jFtc (QZ_`f ASse��errs ��(s P/O�� c- -fA {vC�ow.«�....�c�tve-. - To-o Z� l-o�rCe� �- (3 f�C' Rd+ e' r't (O'T- .` ..�t�)C._ /t'CG�.• __. a'1o3 - I -oS`-6 CLeres -..Lrl -c-r cv r-r_er.{- C -- ---.v c�c �.�-E- w �{f, ._ f`�� eFcer�� c_-E-__ _w > �•-k<<��- - - � - - -Asr�=��__ "-"`��,e__•--`�°r�`..,_�`�g� __/�Ssessao-�s___'��-((S-- w0.S..=..._____. __.._ - --- - - - o'._ �� _ _ ��c•�F. � 2.3 a—t O � —1 -U S—`� )__ _-r�-0"... __.� Rv--Ec � v e-,ac� ses-"- - -- - ---._ .. . U c�. c� e.o- '�� � -- - "'� . iE -C , (2 a o cp a-e��l (5 a ss_c � �� �-ts c� C ce.�tP�r ca •-C a .� .Irt,c-wr t` C9ra� S - ��W .: - _1 VC�� cJUC� a-%j _. - - ��-_ . �,.�.1�,1.�'e _0.c�c� Reco-e��� �?��`-w�_'.._.__-"--����•-vim � S-� _�-tZ�(\�� . _ ... , .= • .. ..1 `�.0.�`otlw` �� C�?�� :..-..-��..rizc�� ....-_ . ,-. -,_. ,..�.- -��' ��.c� _,.-.. �S S C ��._L� _� �' __ : ,� -.�. _-_ "" - ,. _ S--o (- 3C, .-Ae�`S,P__.5��� r- . - - - - - - --- - - -- ----.=),.(_�. _oes �C '`per (9 - �c�t"�pvaL"C �t?►� ('jC�cn - l -LAC 1 PROGRAM TITLE Comm unity Economic Development Board (CERB) (GR-4mr ADMINISTERING AGENCY ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE TO: Cities XX Counties XX Indian Tribes Department of Trade and Economic Development Service Agencies Area -Wide Planning Groups Special Districts 'Ports and other political subdivisions as appropriate XX* PROGRAM DESCRIPTION CERB makes loans (and/or of public facilities which will result in specific Private sector innvesntments andue permanent o finance the construction permanent job opportunities. Eligible projects include, but are not limited to: highways. sewer, water, access roads, bridges, and improvements to state CERB's objectives are to: strengthen the economies of areas with chronically high unemployment growth, encourage diversification to provide greater seasonal and cyclical stability in incomnd employment, ent and provide incentives to expand employment opportunities for local economically-disadvantagediltyinic Ym AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION RCW 43.160 groups. FINANCIAL INFORMATION There is no funding minimu one project per application can be submitted. No s m/maanmum level established for applications. More than be exhausted prior to seeking CERB dollars. Total funding local vvailable during the 1991 931b biennium is unknowna should time.l sources of at his PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING ASSISTANCE Intergovernmental review is required. No re -a -application required, but development of the project application should be coordinated with the CERB program administrator. P pp lion is The CERB meets every other month. Meetings held during the legislative session are on the third Saturdayof January and March in Olympia. The remaining meetings are held on the third Thursday of the month. Applications submitted at least 45 daysprior nuary p 'or to the CERB meeting date. PP ns must be CONTACT Donna Batch, CERB Program Manager, Department of Trade and Economic Avenue, Suite 2700, Seattle, WA 98121, (206) 464-6282 Development, 2001 6th PRINTED INFORMATION AVAILABLE yES 193 PROGRAM TITLE Development Loan Fund (LOAN) } ADMINISTERING AGENCY Department of Community Development, through Washington State Development l : _ Loan Fund Committee ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE TO: Cities XX Service Agencies Counties XX Area -Wide Planning Groups Indian Tribes Special Districts PROGRAM DESCRIPTION In response to applications submitted by local governments, the Development Loan Fund (DLF) provides capital for businesses primarily in designated distressed areas. Approved projects will create or retain jobs, particularly for lower income persons. DLF funds the difference between the total project cost and the funds E available from private financing and equity. (Gap financing) Financing requests for both fixed assets and working capital investments will be considered. Commitments are based on the following factors: Contribution of the project to community economic development goals; jobs created or retained at reasonable public expense; leverage of private sector funds; need for public sector funds; and project feasibility. - Maximum loan will be $350,000, unless special approval is granted by the Director of the Department in which case, loans up to $700,000 may be considered. AUTIIORIZING LEGISLATION RCW 43.168 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Approximately $3,000,000 is currently available. A maximum $350,000 is'available per project (can go up to $700,000 with special authorization of agency director). City/County applicant can submit any number of projects during the year; funding decisions are made quarterly. Businesses must obtain private sector financing (equity and debt) to leverage the DLF loan. The minimum leverage required is $2 private for every $1 Ipublic. Loans may include below market rate interest and favorable amortization. Businesses must demonstrate repayment ability. PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING ASSISTANCE Preapplications are encouraged. The Department provides assistance to potential applicants in structuring the financing request and completing the application. Intergovernmental review is required. CONTACT Kraig Kushar, Manager of Development Loan Fund, Department of Community Development, Business Finance Unit, Ninth and Columbia Building, MS GH-51, Olympia, WA 985044151, (206) 586-1964 or 1-800-562-5677. :y PRINTED INFORMATION AVAILABLE YES 37 PROGRAM TITLE State Development Loan Fund (GRANT AND LOAN) ADMINISTERING AGENCY Department of Community Development ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE TO: Cities XX Service Agencies Counties XX Area -Wide Planning Groups Indian Tribes Special Districts XX PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Development Loan Fund (DLF) was created during the 1985 legislative session for the purpose of providing capital to promote economic development and job creation in economically distressed areas of the state. DLF provides funding for the difference between the total project costs and the level of private financing and equity available to the project. A loan may not exceed $700,000 and must leverage at least $2 of private capital for every public loan dollar. A minimum of one job must be created or retained for every $10,000 of public funds and 50 percent of the jobs must be for low to moderate income families. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION RCW 43.168 FINANCIAL INFORMATION There is a minimum dollar amount of $10,000 and a maximum of $350,000 available. Up to $700,000 is available upon approval of the agency director. There is no limit on the number of projects which can be submitted or approved per year. Projects must create one permanent job for every $10,000 borrowed and must include $2 of private investment for every $1 borrowed. Project financing must also demonstrate gap financing. PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING ASSISTANCE Applications are accepted year round. Applications must be completed by the business requesting funds and the sponsoring local jurisdiction. CONTACT Steven I? Saylor, Development Loan Fund Program Manager, Department of Community Development, Ninth and Columbia Building, MS: GH-51, Olympia, WA 98504, (206) 586-8976. PRINTED INFORMATION AVAILABLE Yes 73 PROGRAM TITLE Outdoor Recreation Grant -In -Aid Funding (GRAN7) ADMINISTERING AGENCY Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE TO: �. Cities XX Service Agencies I Counties XX Area -Wide Planning Groups t" Indian Tribes XX Special Districts XX* ( 'Schools, ports, parks, recreation, firearms range and shooting facilities, and Washington Wildlife and Recreation I Program PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) provides grant-in-aid funding E assistance to local and state agencies for the acquisition, development, and renovation of outdoor recreation facilities. The program not only includes monies -for traditional park facilities, such as cities, counties, and state parks, but also includes dedicated funds for specific uses, such as non -highway and off -road vehicles parks (NHR-ORV), boating facilities, and firearms range and shooting facilities and the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program. Technical assistance on project development and comprehensive planning is also available. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION RCW 43.99; RCW 46.09, RCW 77.12, and RCW 82.49.030(3), New Chapter to 43.99, Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program f FINANCIAL INFORMATION Traditional Park Grants: Funded with state bonds and federal land and water conservation fund (LWCF); about $1,000,000 available annually at 50150 match; local share can be made up of cash, in -kind services, and donated labor materials and value of land. Boating Facility Grants: Funded with Initiative 215 funds (unreclaimed motor boat fuel tax); about $1,500,000 available annually; local share same as above. Firearms Range Account: Approximately $150,000 per year available for local and nonprofit groups which provide shooting ranges. These funds must be matched 50150 by the sponsor. Wildlife and Recreation Program: Established by the Legislature in 1990, requires equal division of funds between habitat conservation Account and Outdoor Recreation Account; designates distribution formula for the funds; made various appropriations. There is $53 million in the acquisition program. Non- Highway/Off-Road Vehicles: Funded with 1 percent of gas tax fund; about $3,000,000 available annually for federal, state, and local agencies up to a 100 percent basis; provides funds for planning, education/enforcement, acquisition/development of facilities, and maintenance and operation. PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING ASSISTANCE There is no pre -application required but a letter of intent briefly describing the project scope and a rough estimate of cost is due by December 1 of each year for March meeting consideration and May 1 each year for December funding consideration. Funding occurs twice each year in March and November. No.intergovernmental review is required in the initial application; however, if approved, it will be required if Federal Land and Water Conservation Funds (LWCF) are used. CONTACT Robert L. Wilder, Director, Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, 48W Capitol Blvd, MS KP- 11, Olympia, WA 98504-5611, (206) 753-3610. PRINTED INFORMATION AVAILABLE YES 139 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION 11.300 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. -GRANTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. , . AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law 89-136, as amended; Public Law 98-166; 42 U.S.C. 3131, 3132, 3135, 3171. OBJECTIVES: To promote long-term economic development. and assist in the construction of public works and development facili- ties needed to initiate and encourage the creation or retention of permanent jobs in the private sector in areas experiencing severe economic distress. TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project.Grants. USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grants for such public facilities as water and sewer systems, industrial access roads to industrial parks, port facilities, railroad sidings and spurs, tourism facilities, vocational schools, business incubator facilities, and infrastructure improvements. for industrial parks. Qualified projects.must fulfill a pressing need of the area and must: (1) Tend to improve the op- portunities for the successful establishment or expansion of indus- trial or commercial plants or facilities; (2) assist in the creation of additional long-term employment opportunities; or (3) benefit the long-term unemployed/underemployed and members of low- income families. In addition, proposed projects must be consistent with the currently approved Overall Economic Development Pro- gram for the area, and for the Economic Development District, if any, in which it will be located, and must have adequate local share of funds with evidence of firm commitment and availability. Projects must be capable of being started and completed in a timely manner. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: Applicant Eligibility: States, cities, counties, and other. political subdi-. visions, Indian tribes, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Re- public of the Marshall Islands, Commonwealths and territories of the U.S. flag, and private or public nonprofit organizations or as- sociations representing a redevelopment area or a designated Eco- nomic Development Center are eligible to receive grants. Corpo- rations and associations organized for profit are not eligible. Beneficiary Eligibility: Business creating or retaining jobs for the local economy, unemployed and underemployed persons and/or members of low-income families. Credentials/Documentation: Application must describe the type of proposed facility, estimated costs, extent of proposed project, per- manent private sector job impact (estimated payrolls, estimated private investment), estimated time for construction implementa- tion and completion, and assurances that the project will satisfy statutory requirements. Most important, documentation must dem- onstrate how the project will have a positive impact on the eco- nomic development of the community. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS: Preapplication Coordination: The Economic Development Represent- ative (EDR) or other appropriate EDA officials will. meet with the applicant and community leaders to establish the basis for a preapplication conference. After reviewing the preapplication, the EDR and/or the regional office will notify the applicant immedi- ately if EDA cannot accept an application. If the project appears viable, a preapplication conference with Regional Office personnel may be arranged at the Regional Director's discretion. If EDA decides to invite a formal application, the standard application forms furnished by EDA. must be used for this program. An envi- ronmental impact assessment is necessary for this program. After a review of the environmental impact assessment is completed, an environmental impact statement may also be required. This pro- gram is eligible for coverage under E.O. 12374 "Intergovernmen- tal Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official designated as the single. point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in applying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review. This progratri is excluded from" coverage under OMB Circular No. A-102. Application Procedure: Applicant should contact the EDR servicing the State in which the project is located. An Economic Develop- ment Representative 'assigned as coordinator of the project for EDA will provide necessary forms and assistance to interested ap- plicants. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No: A-110. Award Procedure: Grant applications invited from, eligible applicants are reviewed by the Regional Offices, and final decision is made by the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Economic Develop- ment. Deadlines: Generally, the applicant is given 30 to 45 days after the application has been invited to submit the formal application. Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: Normally within 150 days of acceptance of a fully completed application. Appeals; None. Renewals: None. ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Formula and Matching Requirements: The basic grant rate. may be up to 50 percent of the., project cost. Severely depressed areas may re- ceive supplementary grants to bring the Federal contribution up to 80 percent of the project cost; designated Indian Reservations may be eligible for up to 100 percent assistance. Additionally, redevel- opment areas located within and actively participating in and sup- porting the operations of designated Economic Development Dis- tricts may, subject to the 80 percent maximum Federal grant limit, be eligible for a 10 percent bonus on grants for public works projects. On average, EDA grants cover approximately 50 percent of project costs. Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: EDA grant funds are dis- bursed for costs incurred only after all contracts for construction have been awarded. POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: Reports: Standard financial and performance reports are required, and special reports for specific projects may be requested. Compli- ance: Applicable statutes include the Architectural Barriers Act, Civil Rights Act, Davis Bacon Act and the Water Pollution Con- trol Act. Audits: State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive between $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an audit made in accordance with Federal laws and regula- tions governing the programs in which they participate. Records: As necessary for above -mentioned audit. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Account Identification: 13-2050-0-1-452. Obligations: (Grants) FY 89 $123,843,000; FY 90 est $122,636,000; and FY 91 est $0. (This program is being proposed for termination in fiscal year 1991.) Range and Average of Financial Assistance: No specific minimum or maximum project amount - $95,000 to $3,750,000; $625,000. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1989, 195 regular projects were approved. REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Title 13 CFR Chapter III, Part 302, 305, 309, 310, 311 and 314; Annual Report; Economic Development Administration Civil Rights Guidelines. INFORMATION CONTACTS: Regional or Local Office: Refer to Appendix IV of the Catalog for EDA Regional Office addresses. 6-90 129 Headquarters Office: David L. McIlwain, Director, Public Works Division, Economic Development Administration, Room H7326, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Department of Commerce, Washing- ton, DC 20230. Telephone: (202) 377-5265. (Use same 7-digit number for FTS.) RELATED PROGRAMS: 11.301, Economic Development —Business Development Assistance; 11.302, Economic Development —Sup- port for Planning Organizations; 11.303, Economic Develop- ment —Technical Assistance; 11.304, Economic Development — Public Works Impact Projects; 11.307, Special Economic Devel- opment and Adjustment Assistance Program —Sudden and Severe Economic Dislocation and Long -Term Economic Deterioration; .15.124, Indian Loans —Economic Development; 23.001, Appalach- ian Regional Development (See individual Appalachian Pro- grams). EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: 1) Infrastructure for industri- al park development; 2) port development and expansion; 3) infra- structure necessary for economic development (e.g. water/sewer facilities); 4) renovation and recycling of old industrial buildings; 5) construction of vocational -technical facilities and skill centers; and 6) construction of incubator facilities. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Project proposals must be located within a severely distressed, designated area and must be in conformance with an Overall Economic Development Pro- gram (OEDP) for the eligible area. Project must also contribute to long-term economic development of the area by creating or retain- ing permanent jobs and raising income levels. Conformance with the Federal Register announcements and other EDA and/or Fed- eral program requirements such -as NEPA, Civil Rights and His- toric Preservation is part of the selection criteria. 11.301 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law 89-136, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3142, 3171. OBJECTIVES: To sustain industrial and commercial viability in desig- nated areas by providing financial assistance to businesses that create or retain permanent jobs, expand or establish plants in rede- velopment areas for projects where financial assistance is not available from other sources on terms and conditions that would permit accomplishment of the project and further economic devel- opment in the area. TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Loan Guarantees/Grants. USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The government will guarantee up to 80 percent of the unpaid balance of loans made by private lend- ers to private sector borrowers for the acquisition of fixed assets and/or for working capital. Minimum loan guarantee size is nor- mally $500,000. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: Applicant Eligibility: Private lending institutions lending to private borrowers (including Indian Tribes) whose projects have been ap- proved for assistance by the State or political sub -division in which the project to be financed is located. Business development guarantees are not available for projects if the borrower(s): (1) Contemplates relocating part or all of its existing facilities with a resultant loss of employment at such existing facilities; (2) pro- duces a product or service for which there is a sustained and pro- longed excess of supply over demand; or (3) will use the funds for research and/or development or retail merchandising operations. Beneficiary Eligibility: The project funded must provide more than a temporary alleviation of unemployment and/or under -employment within the area wherein the project is or will be located. Credentials/Documentation: Applicants and beneficiaries must pro- vide financial, engineering, and feasibility documentation support- ing the viability of the project. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS: Preapplication Coordination: Applicant (the lender) should contact the EDA Credit and Debt Management Division in Washington, DC. Telephone: (202) 377-2621. This program is excluded from . coverage under E.O. 12372 and OMB Circular No. A-102r Application Procedure: Upon preliminary proposal evaluation. by EDA, applicant -lenders will be provided with all .necessary forms and detailed information relating to supporting documentation. An environmental impact assessment is required for this program; an environmental impact statement may be required. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-410. Award Procedure: Applications are approved by and at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary for Economic Development, depart- ment of Commerce. Deadlines: By June 30 to allow processing by September 30 of each fiscal year. Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 90 to 150 calendar days after receipt of application, if the supporting documentation is complete and in good order. Appeals: None. An applicant whose project has been denied may, however, reinstate its application if the defects leading to a denial have been remedied, or may reapply. Renewals: Not applicable. ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Formula and Matching Requirements: Applicants (the lenders) are en- couraged to increase their non -guaranteed participation beyond the minimum 20 percent; borrowers are encouraged to increase equity participation above the minimum 15 percent required for going businesses, 25 percent for new ventures. Lenders must remain at risk for their percentage for the life of the loan guaran- tee. Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Guarantees usually cover the life of the loan. Working capital ,loans normally mature in 5 to 7 years; fixed asset loans normally run for the average life of the assets purchased. Loan pricing: Normally, up to lender's prime rate plus 1.25 percent at 80 percent guarantee, increasing to prime plus 2.5 percent at 60 percent guarantee. Borrower principals may be required to guarantee repayment. POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: Reports: Periodic financial and employment reports are required, usually on a quarterly basis. Audits: Annual certified statements are required from the borrower. Records: Retention of financial and other records pertaining to the loan is required for three years following repayment. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Account Identification: 13-2050-0-1-452. Obligations: (Guarantees) FY 89 $3,150,000; FY 90 est $35,000,000; and FY 91 est $0. (This program is being proposed for termination in fiscal year 1991.) Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $500,000 to $111,100,000; $2,000,000. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1989, two loan guarantees were approved. REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Code of Fed- eral Regulations, Part 13, CFR 306. INFORMATION CONTACTS: Regional or Local Office: Refer to Appendix IV of the Catalog for EDA Regional Office addresses. Headquarters Office: Deputy Assistant Secretary for Loan Programs, Economic Development Administration, Room H7844, Herbert C.Hoover Building, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.Telephone: (202) 377-5067. (Use same 7-digit number for FTS.) RELATED PROGRAMS: 10.422, Business and Industrial Loans; 59.003, Loans for Small Businesses; 59.012, Small Business Loans; 59.013, State and Local Development Company Loans. EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Guarantee of 80 percent of a lender's fixed -asset loan to a start-up manufacturer of telecom- munications switch boards; guarantee of 60 percent of a lender's loan to a chemical manufacturer for fixed assets and working cap- ital. 130 6-90 Headquarters Office: David L. McIlwain, Director, Public Works Division, Economic Development Administration, Room H7326, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Department of Commerce, Washing- ton, DC 20230. Telephone: (202) 377-5265. (Use same 7-digit number for FTS.) RELATED PROGRAMS: 11.301, Economic Development —Business Development Assistance; 11.302, Economic Development —Sup- port for Planning Organizations-,11.303, Economic Develop- ment —Technical Assistance; . 11.304, Economic Development — Public Works Impact Projects; 11.307, Special Economic Devel- opment and Adjustment Assistance Program —Sudden and Severe Economic Dislocation and Long -Term Economic Deterioration; .15.124, Indian Loans —Economic Development; 23.001, Appalach- ian Regional Development (See individual Appalachian Pro- grams).. EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: 1) Infrastructure for industri- al park development; 2) port development and expansion; 3) infra- structure necessary for economic development (e.g. water/sewer facilities); 4) renovation and recycling of old industrial buildings; 5) construction of vocational -technical facilities and skill centers; and 6) construction of incubator facilities. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Project proposals must be located within a severely distressed, designated area and must be in conformance with an Overall Economic Development Pro- gram (OEDP) for the eligible area. Project must also contribute to long-term economic development of the area by creating or retain- ing permanent jobs and raising income levels. Conformance with the Federal Register announcements and other EDA and/or Fed- eial program requirements such.as NEPA, Civil Rights and His- toric Preservation is part of the selection criteria. 11.301 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT —BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law 89-136, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3142, 3171. OBJECTIVES: To sustain industrial and commercial viability in desig- nated areas by providing financial assistance to businesses that create or retain permanent jobs, expand or establish plants in rede- velopment areas for projects where financial assistance is not available from other sources on terms and conditions that would permit accomplishment of the project and further economic devel- opment in the area. TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Loan Guarantees/Grants. USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: The government will guarantee up to 80 percent of the unpaid balance of loans made by private lend- ers to private sector borrowers for the acquisition of fixed assets and/or for working capital. Minimum loan guarantee size is nor- mally $500,000. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: Applicant Eligibility: Private lending institutions lending to private borrowers (including Indian Tribes) whose projects have been ap- proved for assistance by the State or political sub -division in which the project to be financed is located. Business development guarantees are not available for projects if the borrower(s): (1) Contemplates relocating part or all of its existing facilities with a resultant loss of employment at such existing facilities; (2) pro- duces a product or service for which there is a sustained and pro- longed excess of supply over demand; or (3) will use the funds for research and/or development or retail merchandising operations. Beneficiary Eligibility: The project funded must provide more than a temporary alleviation of unemployment and/or under -employment within the area wherein the project is or will be located. Credentials/Documentation: Applicants and beneficiaries must pro- vide financial, engineering, and feasibility documentation support- ing the viability of the project. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS: Preapplication Coordination: Applicant (the lender) should contact the EDA Credit and Debt Management Division in Washington, DC. Telephone: (202) 377-2621. This program is excluded from coverage under E.O. 12372 and OMB Circular No. A-102. Application Procedure: Upon preliminary proposal evaluation by EDA, applicant -lenders will be provided with all necessary forms and detailed information relating to supporting documentation. An environmental impact assessment is required for this program; an environmental impact statement may be required. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-110. Award Procedure: Applications are approved by and at the discretion of the Assistant Secretary for Economic Development, depart- ment of Commerce. Deadlines: By June 30 to allow processing by September 30 of each fiscal year. Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 90 to 150 calendar days after receipt of application, if the supporting documentation is complete and in good order. Appeals: None. An applicant whose project has been denied may, however, reinstate its application if the defects leading to a denial have been remedied, or may reapply. Renewals: Not applicable. ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Formula and Matching Requirements: Applicants (the lenders) are en- couraged to increase their non -guaranteed participation beyond the minimum 20 percent; borrowers are encouraged to increase equity participation above the minimum 15 percent required for going businesses, 25 percent for new ventures. Lenders must remain at risk for their percentage for the life of the loan guaran- tee. Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Guarantees usually cover the life of the loan. Working capital loans normally mature in 5 to 7 years; fixed asset loans normally run for the average life of the assets purchased. Loan pricing: Normally, up to lender's prime rate plus 1.25 percent at 80 percent guarantee, increasing to prime plus 2.5 percent at 60 percent guarantee. Borrower principals may be required to guarantee repayment. POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: Reports: Periodic financial and employment reports are required, usually on a quarterly basis. Audits: Annual certified statements are required from the borrower. Records: Retention of financial and other records pertaining to the loan is required for three years following repayment. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Account Identification: 13-2050-0-1-452. Obligations: (Guarantees) FY 89 $3,150,000; FY 90 est $35,000,000; and FY 91 est $0. (This program is being proposed for termination in fiscal year 1991.) Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $500,000 to $I 11, 100,000; $2,000,000. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: In fiscal year 1989, two loan guarantees were approved. REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: Code of Fed- eral Regulations, Part 13, CFR 306. INFORMATION CONTACTS: Regional or Local Office: Refer to Appendix IV of the Catalog for EDA Regional Office addresses. Headquarters Office: Deputy Assistant Secretary for Loan Programs, Economic Development Administration, Room H7844, Herbert C.Hoover Building, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230.Telephone: (202) 377-5067. (Use same 7-digit number for FTS.) RELATED PROGRAMS: 10.422, Business and Industrial Loans; 59.003, Loans for Small Businesses; 59.012, Small Business Loans; 59.013, State and Local Development Company Loans. EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Guarantee of 80 percent of a lender's fixed -asset loan to a start-up manufacturer of telecom- munications switch boards; guarantee of 60 percent of a lender's loan to a chemical manufacturer for fixed assets and working cap- ital. 130 6-90 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: EDA expects that a project will create or save at least one job for each $20,000 of Federal assistance and demonstrate reasonable assurance of full re- payment of the guaranteed loan. A first security interest will be required in assets acquired with the guaranteed loan funds. 11.302 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT —SUPPORT FOR PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS (Development District Program; Redevelopment Area Program; and Indian Program) FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law 89-136, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3151, 3152. OBJECTIVES: To assist in providing administrative aid to multi - county district, redevelopment areas and Indian tribes to establish and maintain economic development planning and implementation capability and thereby promote effective utilization of resources in the creation of full-time permanent jobs for the unemployed and the underemployed in areas of high distress. TYPES OF ASSISTANCE: Project Grants. USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS: Grants are used for staff salaries and other planning and .administrative expenses of the economic development organization. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: Applicant Eligibility: ,(I) Public bodies and other nonprofit organiza- tions representing groups of State -delineated adjoining counties, which include at least one area designated as a redevelopment area by the Secretary of Commerce and one or more centers of growth not over 250,000 population; (2) Indian Tribes; and (3) Counties designated as redevelopment areas or nonprofit organiza- tions representing redevelopment areas or parts of such areas. Beneficiary Eligibility: Areas and regions of substantial and persistent unemployment and residents (particularly unemployed and low income persons) of those areas. Credentials/Documentation: Evidence that the governing body of the development organization is at least 51 percent elected officials and broadly representative of the social, economic and political groups in area; minority membership must be in proportion to the minority population, but not necessarily exceeding 25 percent. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A-87. APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS: Preapplication Coordination: Submission of letter of interest and pro- posed work program to the EDA Regional Office serving the area. State and EDA concurrence in organization and boundary of multi -county district. The standard application forms as furnished by the Federal Agency and required by 15 CFR, Part 24, "Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments" must be used for this program. This program is eligible for cover- age under E.O. 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." An applicant should consult the office or official des- ignated as the single point of contact in his or her State for more information on the process the State requires to be followed in ap- plying for assistance, if the State has selected the program for review. This.program is excluded from coverage under OMB Cir- cular No. A-102. Application Procedure: Completion of Standard Form 424, Applica- tion for Federal Assist9nce, prescribed by 15 CFR, Part 24. The application is submitted through an Economic Development Ad- ministration representative to the appropriate Regional Office. Ap- plications must be cleared through the State's Intergovernmental Review Process as authorized by Executive Order 12372. This program is excluded from coverage under OMB Circular No. A- lto. Award Procedure: Grant applications are approved by the EDA Re- gional Office Director or, in the case of new grantees, the Assist- ant Secretary for Economic Development. Deadlines: Dates are published in the Federal Register. Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 30 to 90 days. Appeals: Not applicable. Renewals: Grants are made for a 1-year period and are renewable if grantee's performance is satisfactory; the area continues to exhibit distress, and the proposed work program is acceptable. ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Formula and Matching Requirements: A minimum of 25 percent must be obtained from nonfederal sources except for grants to •Indian tribes. This may be in the form of cash and in -kind contributions. The Secretary is authorized to fund up to 100 percent planning support grants to Indian tribes. Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Up to 1 year. Funds are re- leased in two or three payments ' over the course of the grant period. POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: Reports: Quarterly financial reports; progress reports five months and 10 months after grant approval; annual updating of an Overall Economic Development Program (OEDP). Audits- State and local governments that receive financial assistance of $100,000 or more within a State's fiscal year shall have an audit made for that year. State and local governments that receive be- tween $25,000 and $100,000 within the State's fiscal year shall have an ' audit made in accordance with Federal laws and regula- tions governing the programs in which they participate. Records: Financial records must be maintained until 3 years after the completion of the grant project or submission of the final financial report, whichever is later, and be readily available for inspection and audit. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Account Identification 13-2050-0-1-452. Obligations: (Grants) FY 89 $18,708,000; FY 90 est $17,954,000; and FY 91 est $0. (This program is being proposed for termination in fiscal year 1991.) Range and Average of Financial Assistance: $25,000 to $65,000; $50,000. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS: The number of grantees funded in fiscal year 1989 was 340. REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE: 13 CFR 303, 304, 307, 311. INFORMATION CONTACTS: Regional or Local Office: Refer to Appendix IV of the Catalog for EDA Regional Office addresses. Headquarters Office: Luis F. Bueso, Director Planning Division, Economic Development Administration, Room H7023, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Washington, DC 20230. Telephone: (202) 377- 2873. (Use same 7-digit number for FTS.) RELATED PROGRAMS: 11.303, Economic Development —Technical Assistance; 11.305, Economic Development —State and Local Economic Development Planning; 23.009, Appalachian Local De- velopment District Assistance. EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS: Support to hire professional staff or the following types of areas; a 10-county rural organiza- tion; a 5-county rural organization that includes an Indian reserva- tion; a 500,000-acre Indian reservation; and a 30,000-acre Indian reservation. CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS: Criteria for funding in- clude: satisfactory past performance, continued economic distress, and submission of an acceptable work program. The program pre- supposes continuing administrative support and new grants are in- frequent. Priorities for the selection of new grantees focus on the extent of persistent economic distress, length of time potential grantee has been authorized or designated as a district, quality of proposed work program, and interregional balance. 11.303 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT —TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FEDERAL AGENCY: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINIS- TRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AUTHORIZATION: Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, Public Law 89-136, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3151, 3152. 6-90 131 ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING e Property Acquisition Proposal Prepared by Mayor Naughten & Art Housler - March 16,1991 it TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTACHMENT #1 Memorandum from Mayor Naughten - March 1, 1991. ATTACHMENT #2 Letter from Mayor Naughten to Robert Henning owner of Alaska Northwest. Publishing - March 1, 1991 ATTACHMENT #3 Edmonds Waterfront Study overview base map. ATTACHMENT #4 Alaska Northwest Publishing property map. ATTACHMENT #5 Property Uses ATTACHMENT #6 Edmonds Waterfront Study site plan,Option B. ATTACHMENT #7 Financing Scenarios ATTACHMENT #8 Payments ATTACHMENT #9 Financing Debt Payment March 1, 1991 MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Larry S. Naughten Mayor SUBJECT: ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING PROPERTY On Thursday, February 28, Art and I met with Mr. Bob Henning who is the owner of the Alaska Northwest Publishing properties. We talked about several things, but the main topic of discussion was under what financial arrangement would it be best for him and the City to pursue purchase of this property, if indeed we were interest- ed in purchasing it. Along that train of thought, Mr. Henning suggested that Art talk to his Accountant and they can talk about the various scenarios for purchasing and financing that would be a benefit to him tax -wise and to the City with regard to debt service. I told Mr. Henning that the City is still exploring different options for use of the property and looking at it on a cost -benefit basis. We agreed with Mr. Henning, because he is anxious to move on the property now, that we would have an answer to him by April 1 as to whether or not the City is interested in purchasing the property. If we do decide to purchase the property, of course, it would be contingent upon inspections of the building, appraisals, etc. etc. Mr. Henning did indicate that McCally and Associates in Everett did an appraisal in July of 1989, which could probably be updated fairly easily. He is currently leasing the building at $5,100 per month; but only 8,000 square feet of the 9,500 square feet that is there. The 5,000 square foot storage shed is now empty; it is however mov- able, can be dismantled and reassembled, which gives it some added value. The building was built in 1963 and the storage shed in 1968. The existing mortgage of $1.1 million is broken into three various mortgages, with different interest rates, etc. There is a question on the parking lot as to whether or not it could be sold. It may be dedicated parking to the ,building to the north so we have to investi- gate that. Let's plan an Executive Session for more conversation Tuesday follow- ing our Council Meeting. ,-7 LSN/db CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 775.2525 •890 194- March 1, 1991 Mr. Robert Henning Alaska Northwest Publishing Company 130 Second Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Bob: TARRY S. NAUGHTEN MArOA I wanted to confirm our conversation on February 28 regarding your proper- ty. The first step is to determine a purchase and financing agreement. If the City decides to purchase your property, a purchase agreement that would hopefully meet your needs and the City's regarding financing, would be determined. I will have our Finance Director, Art Housler, contact Fred Anderson to get some dialogue going regarding this subject. The City will advise you by April 1, 1991 whether or not we are interested in purchasing your proper- ty. We appreciate your cooperation and willingness to sell to the City. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS - ry S. ghten yor LSN/db cc: Art Housler, (Finance Director) • Incorporoted August 11, 1890 • c;<<or C71ties International — Hekinan, Japan BITUE I 0 77,5 150 600 ®I L7 u �a a a � GJ2 Cam• , lg C' �o PARKING (32 S7,-qIZ s ) SA,_ 2nd AVE. PARKING 32.000 ar. 37.150 ai. Illillllll FIELD v� Z 0 STORAGE o 5.000 .t. ALASKA SPORTSMAN 3001 731-3,000 ' 9, .39� o00 PROPERTY USES I. INTERMEDIATE A. Relocate Community Services Department to the Alaska Northwest Publishing building. B. Relocate the Municipal Court and the Police Department Detective Division to the Community Service building ( hold court in this building,then the Plaza room could be rented on Mondays. II. LONG-RANGE A. Use as leverage to form a business redevelopment district, regardless if the ferry dock was relocated or not. ► EDvj Hoe 8VDDV VO4LIE; EMN&MM (MOTOMa (11 J SITE PLAN - OPTION B -Transit Iyuh SM AI KEY FEATURES: t . Centrally Located Transit Hub • Encourages Transit Use • Elimin�ate�spbus-train conflicts 2. Ferry Traffic Rrn�end to Dayton via 1N Returns Main Street to Local Use Eflicts VFerry nTra Between Lomll Roman 3. Slow Street Along S.R. 104 -- Main to Slows TDraffiic Traffic Safely \ Integrates Pedestrians, l i Local. &Ferry to Provides Access Open Air Market/Retail on S.R. 104 a 4. Commuter Parking Relocated to Renate Sites With Shuttle Operated by D.O.T. LOCATION MAP I R 1 Transit . Local Traffic ®—_ _0 Ferry Traffic a000g000p Pedestrian Walkway --_-� At Grade Crosswalk l>l Pedestrian Overpass =01 FINANCING SCENARIOS I. LEASE ----- a purchase agreement which in effect is nothing more than a conditional sales contract. II. LEVERAGE LEASE (Certificate of Participation) ----- a third party provides the financing to the lessor who leases to the government. At the end of lease the government owns. III. INTERFUND LOAN ----- a loan from another fund to which would be paid the market interest rate. Loan could only be for a short to medium range number of years. IV. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ----- secured by the full faith and credit (taxing power) of the government. Non -voted - requires an ordinance be adopted:there is a legal limitation of 3/4 of 1% on the value of taxable property. Voted - requires 60% of those voters voting to approve of the purpose described on the ballot. There is a legal limitation of 2 1/2% (including the mon- , voted outstanding indebtedness) on the value of tax- able property for general purposes. In addition voters could approve 2 1/2% for utilities and 2 1/2% for acquiring or developing open space and park facilities. The total indebtedness for General Obligations .cannot exceed 7 1/2% on taxable property. V. REVENUE OBLIGATION BONDS ----- secured by the revenues or receipts derived from the project,facility, and/ or utility. There are no fixed dollar limits; however, bonds cannot be issued with a term of more than 40 years. PAYMENTS I. PAYMENT OBLIGATION ----- the following tabulation shows annual payments on fifteen -year General Obligation bonds: Amount --------- Amount --------- Principal $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Interest 595,000 1,191,000 Total $1,595,000 $3,191,000 Average annual $-a-"300 s2Af2,400 payment ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ Property tax 8 cents 16 cents ncrease /$1000 Cost /$100,000 $8 $16 home /year ■ - ■ Amount $3,000,000 1,787,000 $4,787,000 $3-1'�,100 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 24 cents ■ ■ $24 ■ ■ II. POSSIBLE DOWN PAYMENT - - - - - the following tabulation shows money available: Fund No. Fund Title Amount ------- ------------------------------------ 001 General (cash carry over) $20,000 006 Emergency Financial Reserve 226,000 119 Council Contingency 218,000 125 Park Acquisition/Improvement 240,000 213 LID Guaranty 119,000 325 Capital Improvement 30,000 Total $853,000 FINANCING DEBT PAYMENT -------------------------------------------- Restore property tax at full 106% 1990 $164,000 1991 $287,000 Total $451,000 II. Impose additional 1 /4% real estate sales tax $339,000 II1. Increase utility tax to the full 6% allowed $1 15,000 IV. Lynnwood Toyota move to Edmonds (tax revenue) $320,000 V. Impose a B&O Excise Tax $?????? z 4 6 4- r l CHAPTER 16.50 CCOMMUNITYBUSINESS 16.50.000 PURPOSES 16.50 The BC zone has the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in Chapter 16.40. A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple residential uses as a secondary use to business uses. 16.50.010 USES A. Permitted Primary Uses. 1. Single-family dwelling, as regulated in RS-6 zone. 2. Retail stores, offices and service uses, excluding intense uses, such as trailer sales, used -car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment sales and services. 3. New automobile sales and service. 4. Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents. 5. Printing, publishing and binding establishments. 6. Bus stop shelters. B. Permitted Secondary Uses. 1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use. 105 J 16.50.020 3. Multiple dwelling units, in the story above the street floor. �. C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Commercial parking lots. 2. Community facilities, as listed in the RM district. 3. Wholesale uses. 4. Hotels and motels. 5. Amusement establishments. 6. Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions. 7. Drive-in businesses. 8. Laboratories. 9. Fabrication of light industrial products. 10. Convenience stores. D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit. 1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use. 2. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 of the City Code. [Ord. 2660 §2, 1988; Ord. 2366 §8, 1983; Ord. 2283 §5, 1982; Ord. 2266 §1, 1982.] 16.50.020 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table. MINIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM STREET SIDE REAR MAXIMUM FLOOR LOT AREA LOT WIDTH SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK HEIGHT AREA BC None None None Nonel Nonel 25'2 3 sq. ft. per sq. ft. of lot area 1 Fifteen feet from lot lines adjacent to R zoned property. 2 Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof.above the stated height have a slope of 4" in 12" or greater. 106 16.50.03 B. Signs, Parking and Design Review. See Chapters 20.60, 17.50, and 20.10. C. Density. Multiple dwelling units require 3,000 square feet of site area per unit. D. Screening. The required setback from R zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the BC lot. A six- foot minimum height fence, wall or solid hedge shall be provided at some point in the setback: E. Satellite television antennas. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in Section 16.20.050 and reviewed by the Architectural Design Board. [Ord. 2526 §6, 1985.1 16.50.030 OPERATING RESTRICTIONS A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building, except: 1. Public utilities, and parks. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots. 3. Drive-in businesses. 4. Plant nurseries. B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60, Performance Standards. r 107 17.50 CHAPTER 17.50 �OF STREET PARK ING_REGULATIONS 17.50.000 PURPOSES The purposes of this chapter are: A. To reduce street congestion and avoid crowding of on -street parking space. B. To require adequate landscaping of off-street parking areas. C. To protect adjacent property from the impact of a use with inadequate off-street parking. 17.50.010 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIRED A. New Uses or Structures. 1. Off-street parking facilities which comply with this chapter shall be provided before any new use is begun, or any new structure is approved for occupancy. A detailed plan and provisions specifically setting forth the method and location by which the off-street parking required for the proposed use will be met, whether by construction, a joint use agreement, and in lieu of parking fee, or any other method provided by this code, shall be filed and approved in conformance with the applicable provisions of this code before any building permit is issued. 2. If any change of use occurs, or any addition is built, additional parking spaces to meet the requirements of this chapter shall be provided. B. Existing. Uses or Structures. 1. Existing uses or structures shall not be required to comply with the requirements of this chapter except under paragraph 2 or 3 below, if they have off-street parking which complied with applicable regulations at the time the use began or the structure was occupied. 2. If a change of use takes place, or an addition is built, which increases the number of off-street parking spaces normally required by this chapter by more than 10 percent but less than 100 percent, the number of 128 17.50.020 additional off-street parking spaces required by this chapter for the new use or addition shall be required to be provided in addition to the number of spaces pre- viously existing. In no case shall the total requirement exceed that required by this chapter. 3. If a change of use takes place, or an addition is built, which increases the number of off-street parking spaces normally required by this chapter by 100 percent or more, the full number of spaces required by this chapter for the new use or the entire altered building shall be provided. [Ord. 2280 §1, 1982.] 17.50•.020 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS A. Residential. 1. Single family dwellings: one space per dwelling unit. 2. Multiple residential: two spaces per dwelling unit. 3. Boarding house: one space per bed. 4. Rest home, nursing home, convalescent home, residential social welfare facilities: one space per three beds. 5. Single family dwellings with accessory dwelling unit: three spaces total. [Ord. 2352 §9, 1983.1 B. Business. 1. Retail stores, including art galleries, convenience stores, department stores, discount stores, drug stores, grocery stores, supermarkets: one space per 300 square feet. 2. Furniture, appliances, and hardware stores: one space per 600 square feet. 3. Services uses, including barber shops, beauty shops, dry cleaners, laundries, repair shops: one.space per 600 square feet. 4. Medical, dental and veterinarian offices, banks and clinics: one space per 200 square feet. 5. Business and professional offices with on -site customer service: one space per 400 square feet. 6. Offices not providing on -site customer service: one space per 800 square feet. 129 17.50.020 7. Bowling alley: four spaces per bowling lane. 8. Commercial recreation: one space per 500 square feet, or one space for each customer allowed by the maximum permitted occupant load. 9. Car repair, commercial garage: one space per 200 square feet. 10. Drive-in restaurants, automobile service station, car dealer, used car lot: one space per 500 square feet of lot area. 11. Restaurant, tavern, cocktail lounge: if less than 4,000 square feet floor area, one per 200 square feet gross floor area; if over 4,000 square feet floor area, 20 plus 1 per 100.square feet gross floor area in excess of 4,000 square feet. 12. Plant nurseries (outdoor retail area): one space per 5 square feet of outdoor retail area. 13. Motels and hotels: one space per room or unit. 14. Retail warehouse, building materials yard: one space per. 1,000 square feet of lot area or one per three employees. 15. Manufacturing, laboratories, printing, research, ..automobile wrecking yards, kennels: one space per two employees on largest shift. 16. Mortuary: one space per four fixed seats or per 400 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater. 17. Marina: to be determined by the Hearing Examiner, using information provided by the applicant, and the following criteria: a. The type of storage facility (moorage, dry storage, trailer parking) and intended use (sailboats, fishing boats, leisure boats). - b. The need to accommodate overflow peak parking demand from other uses accessory to the marina. C. The availability and use of public transit. 18. Storage warehouse: one space per employee. 19. Wholesale warehouse: one space per employee. I 130 17.50.030 C. Community Facilities. 1. Outdoor places of public.assembly, including stadiums and arenas: one space per eight fixed seats, or per 100 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater. 2. Theaters: one space per five seats. 3. Indoor places of public assembly, including churches, auditoriums: one space per four seats or one space per 40 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater. 4. Elementary schools, junior high schools, boarding schools (elementary through senior high), residential colleges and universities: six spaces per classroom, or one -space per daytime employee, whichever is greater. 5. Non-residential colleges and universities: one space per daytime employee. 6. High schools (senior): one space per daytime employee. 7. Museums, libraries, art galleries: one space per 250 square feet. 8. Day care centers and preschools: one space per 300 square feet, or one per employee, plus one per five students, whichever is larger. 9. Hospitals: three spaces per bed. 10. Maintenance yard (public or public utility): one space per two employees. 17.50.030 CALCULATIONS A. Square Feet. Unless otherwise specified, square feet refers to the gross building square footage, including outdoor areas used for the same use (such as an outdoor eating area for a restaurant). B. Combination of Uses. Combination of uses shall meet the requirement based on the sum of all the uses reduced by any applicable joint use provisions (see 17.50.060 below). Examples of such combined uses are: a furniture store with a retail display area and attached storage warehouse, a storage warehouse with attached office, a church with a parochial school, and so forth. C. Different Uses on Same Site. The requirement for different uses on the same site shall be the sum of all requirements for the individual uses, reduced by any applicable joint use 131 17.50.040 j provisions. D. Uses Not Specified. Any use not listed above shall meet the requirements of the most similar listed use as determined by the Community Development Director. E. Fractions. When the requirements of this chapter result in a fractional number of parking spaces, one space shall be provided for a fraction of one-half or more, and no space shall be required for a fraction of less than one-half. 17.50.040 LOCATION A. Permitted Uses in Residential Zones. Off-street parking shall be located on the same lot and within 100 feet walking distance of the use for which it is required. B. All Other Uses. Off-street parking shall be located within 300 feet walking distance of the use for which it is required, except that the only requirement of the location of off-street parking required for a use in the Downtown Business Area shall be that such parking be located within the Downtown Business Area that is zoned for Commercial Business (BC). If the off-street parking is not on the same lot as the use for which it is required, the owner or lessor shall provide to the City for recording with the County Auditor an agreement specifying: 1. The location, by legal description or survey, of the off-street parking and the use for which it is.required. 2. A restriction on the property designated for off-street parking that it may not be used for any other purpose unless the parking is no longer required for the use specified in 1 above. [Ord. 2252 §1, 1981.1 17.50.050 STANDARDS See Chapter 18.95 for size, construction and maintenance of off- street parking. 17.50.060 JOINT USE See Chapter 20.30 for joint use of off-street parking facilities. 17.50.070 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS AREA PARKING REQUIREMENTS A. In -Lieu Fee. The parking requirements for a business use in the Downtown Business Area may be partially or entirely satisfied by payment of a fee in lieu of constructing off- street parking spaces. i 132 17.50.070 1. The number of spaces allowed to be satisfied in this manner shall be determined as follows: a. For those business uses whose total parking requirement is ten spaces or less, the Planning Director, using the procedures set forth in Section 20.95.040, may approve in lieu payment for up to 50 percent of the required spaces. b. For those business uses whose total parking requirement is eleven spaces or more, the Planning Director, using the procedures set forth in Section. 20.95.040, may approve in lieu payment for one to five spaces. C. For all business uses requesting in lieu payment for more than 50 percent of required spaces where ten or less spaces are required and for all business uses requesting in lieu payment for more than five spaces where eleven or more spaces are required, the city council may grant approval after a public hearing using the procedures and notice requirements set forth in Section 20.90.010. 2. The criteria for determining the number of spaces eligible for payment in lieu of constructing off-street parking shall include the following: a. The amount of available on -street parking in the immediate area; b. The number of customers likely to be attracted by the particular use, as compared to the general category or use established by this chapter; C. Whether the proposal will detract from the possibility of future central parking lots. [Ord. 2271 §1, 1982.1 B. Downtown Business Area Defined. The Downtown Business Area consists of all land zoned "BC" or "CW" and located in the area east of Puget Sound, south of Edmonds Street, west of Seventh Avenue, and north of Pine Street. C. Criteria for Construction. The Architectural Design Board shall use the following criteria in reviewing the construction of parking spaces in the Downtown Business Area: 1. That the proposal will not lead to development of an area with buildings and parking lots alternating along the street frontage; 133 17.50.080 2. That the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive �. Plan and the Downtown Parking Plan. D. Fee. The in -lieu fee shall be as set forth in Chapter 15.00. The fee shall be paid before a building permit or occupancy permit is issued, whichever is earlier. The fee shall be deposited in the in -lieu parking fund maintained for that purpose. E. Parking Fund. There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "parking fund." All payments made to the city in lieu of construction off-street parking spaces shall be deposited in such fund, upon receipt. The fund shall be used exclusively for projects intended to provide an appropriate supply of parking spaces in the Downtown Business Area, including, though not limited to, acquisition, design,- construction, development and enhancement of on- and/or off-street parking facilities. The fund may also be used for payment of general or limited obligation bonds, off-street parking revenue bonds, and for the acquisition of property by condemnation, purchase or lease for such parking facilities and for other expenses and costs incident thereto. [Ord. 2271 §2, 1982.1 17.50.080 LANDSCAPING The Architectural Design Board shall recommend requirements and guidelines for landscaping of parking lots for council adoption, after reviewing a staff recommendation. 17.50.090 TEMPORARY PARKING LOTS A. Conditional Use. A conditional use permit shall be required in order to construct or maintain a temporary parking lot in any B- or C- zone. Said permit shall be valid for one year provided however that the applicant may apply to the Community Services Director to have said permit extended for one extension of one year upon the filing of a written application stating the reasons for said request prior to the expiration of the original permit. Said application for permit or an appeal of a staff decision approving or denying the extension thereof shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner under the same terms and conditions as any conditional use permit under Section 20.100.010. (Final decision is appealable to the City Council.) B. Improvements. The hearing examiner shall require the applicant to meet the public improvement and dedication requirements for permanent use of the Director of Community Services. The applicant shall also be required to provide a durable, well -drained, dust -free and hard surface for the 134 17.50.100 parking lot. C. Review by the Architectural Design Board. If the conditional use permit is approved, the applicant shall then submit the proposal for review to the Architectural Design Board, and shall comply with any requirements of the Board as to signage, lighting, screening and landscaping. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit an applicant from filing a simultaneous request for review of his conditional use permit application by the hearing examiner and/or review of said lot by the Architectural Design Board. [Ord. 2514, 1985.] 17.50.100 COMMERCIAL VEHICLE REGULATIONS A. No Derson shall Dark or store more than one commercial venicie or any commer gross vehicle weight zoned district unless use permit. For the vehicle".means any mo is the transportation B. The provisions vehicles which 1980.1 ciai venicie over per dwelling unit he/she has first purposes of this for vehicle, the of commodities, i of this section shall not apply to commercial are being loaded or unloaded. [Ord. 2138 §1, 135 ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING COMPANY PROPERTY Located at: 130 2nd Avenue South and 141 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington Ostensible Owner: Mr. Robert Henning Prepared for: Robert Henning 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, Washington Date of Valuation: July 20, 1989 Job #89-36 File ALASKA.789 Prepared by: Allen C. Nelson, Appraiser Charles R. Macaulay, MAI, SREA MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Everett, Washington MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES LTD. REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS 61 O MEDICAL -DENTAL BUILDING 2722 COLBY AVENUE EVERETT. WASHINGTON 9B201 (206) 258-261 1 (EVERETT) (206) 382-971 1 (SEATTLE) July 28, 1989 Robert Henning- 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Appraisal of Alaska Northwest Publishing Company properties located at 130 2nd Avenue South and 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. Dear Mr. Henning: As requested, a personal inspection of the above referenced property has been conducted, for the purpose of forming an opinion as to the market value of the fee simple interest in the subject property, as currently leased. Your attention is invited to the following report for the narrative description, analysis and conclusions of value. Based on the investigation and analysis of all the elements which reasonably affect value, I have formed the opinion that the market value of the subject property, as of July 20, 1989, is concluded to be: THREE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,300,000) Respectfully submitted, MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Allen C. Nelson, Associate Appraiser ACN/dsg Co�vi bYd` A Nri�ll�s COmpDi mo i owh '1 wWN.n �� kmWslro C'e i N la C 1 Osw Swr sell % UMtlM/(/tif vaar % YswJw CID N� wwu vl.� iw�ro�i c„ awn I � a Location Map a: li m Yin i MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS LocationMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Subject Property Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Definition of Market Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Summary of Facts and Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Snohomish County Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Neighborhood Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 19 PlatMap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 SiteData . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Improvement Sketch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ImprovementSales Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Improvement Sales Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Improvements Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 35 AssessedValue and Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Land Use Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Highest and Best Use . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . 40 Property Valuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Land Sales Tabulation . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . 45 Cost Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . 49 Income Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Market Data Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Reconciliation Final Estimate Of Value . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Assumptions And/Or Limiting Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Qualifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON ADDENDA LandSales Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Comparable Land Sales Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Comparable Land Sales Analysis Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Comparable Rentals Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Comparable Rental Analysis Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Market Comparison Analysis Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON rw7 ': Y !: � ♦ �: tiT3 ' i V+,�S � � �.��i �f�BY'k�'�`. "�� +'�}. Yx izn. .,.t. i" t. _ ,� iY' t�L •eYl 1.. �.,n- �, ,:� �• �.: _ . �� °��� ��Iliill�� illlllllll'II� � `�, j � 1111��. �� - � � �_. .0 g�,s 42�-• � M . � �yy� � ..� S �N 4 �� _ I� r"�M� k � ( i:.. +1 th., p [ "1..... L xti "(. � � � . „� ,r� : G:1 1 7y�� K' 3 � � x � 1 _ _ ..� R -:cam w` .�{ . _� _. -.,.. _ --�_ T _ * ff� ( �F,,y,�( .yam t t S �u p Cyr+ � yiry Yl 'i � -'.�� i �Y+'`�P"^Y"'�}.} N�a-+�{�l}'�M"'.'?�'t N ,rv'-i1 wY`a�' i..t4�71' O'�'t..akN+" ��e� �r?,__ _,_., ,f "',`-ti .,�.�'it.. times.-i. e s.. r.4.?.",trE�h,.!'�4..:��r°t�.���T'1''^Fyr TL .'�.s'�'�'!9:''�::`i'a,_ �!'T`.cr wl�Gv"�ti+i1u�: us.� '' { �T,: .• -'-v �m. �. �, � k> '. k n { n � �1 � — •- � - V� S{ .ri .�1.. d� .. �,, .r �- �. J z*`. ..... . ' ' . .- r�-<-•^•�... _-Y;.-'T._ arc wdr �-- -- «... tea.--_. .. •.>?:. � _ �• i 4 4A' . 450 .,,4 yr .�:f ',•ice` Toll '• / t S .n: • a - - -f l a. - 1 J•r„ '" •n' � i a - t Qss�i.` F 'e� fr3 µto rev �S•i..i .(lam. }.I... �.?�K..,* INTRODUCTION Definition of an Appraisal A written statement, independently and impartially prepared by a qualified appraiser, setting forth an opinion of defined value of an adequately -described property, as of a specific date, supported by the presentation and analysis of relevant market information. Appraisal involves selective research into appropriate market areas; the assemblage of pertinent data; the application of appropriate analytical techniques; and the use of knowledge, experience and professional judgement to develop an appropriate solution to the appraisal problem. Purpose of the Appraisal The purpose of the appraisal.is to estimate the market value of the fee simple interest in the subject property. Appraisal Problem This analysis is an update of an appraisal with date of value January 15, 1986. For the reader's benefit, property descriptions from the previous appraisal are included in this report. Market information has been updated and reevaluated to arrive at an indication of cur- rent value for the subject property. As in the original report, the property is appraised in two parcels, denoted Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON Definition of Market Value The most probable price as of a specified date, in cash or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 9th Edition, P 19; American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Chicago, Illinois, 1983) Date of Valuation July 20, 1989 Legal Description That portion of Government Lot 2 in Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., lying easterly of State Highway 104, southerly of James Street and westerly of 2nd Street, as shown on Plat of Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds. Lots 1-3, Block 2, Plan of Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds, as re- corded in Volume 5, Page 43 of Plats, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Five -Year ownership History No sale of the subject property has occurred within the last five years. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON SUMMARY OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Ostensible Owner: Robert Henning Property Address: 130 2nd Avenue South and 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington. Land ArealSize: One site is rectangular in shape and the other is irregular. The northern portion, at the northwest corner of 2nd and James, consists of 10,800 square feet. This parcel is rectangular. The southern portion con- tains approximately 92,600 SF and is ir- regular in shape. Total area of the two sites is 103,400 SF, or 2.374 acres. In the appraisal parcel No. 1 contains 10,800 SF plus 20,497 SF of the before mentioned southern parcel. Parcel No. 2 contains 72,403 SF of the southern site. Site Improvements: There are asphalt surfaced parking areas on the site. Additional site improvements in- clude concrete sidewalks, curbs, lawn area, trees and landscaping around the buildings. Bldg. Improvements: There are three buildings on the property, a retail/office building, a "Butler" build- ing and an office building with production or warehouse space at the basement level and a very good quality penthouse apartment unit on the -2nd floor. The retail/warehouse building contains 9,500 square feet, the Butler building has 5,000 SF, office portion of the northern building contains 9,792 SF, basement warehouse is 8,948 SF and the penthouse apartment has 3,498 square feet. Date(s) of Inspections: June 14, 1989 Land Use Regulations: The subject property is zoned BC, community business by the City of Edmonds. This zon- ing allows a wide variety of commercial uses. Highest and Best Use: Present improvements are considered to be the property's interim highest and best use. Final Estimate of Value: $3,300,000 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY DATA Oak wltiur Cou{wrab ' I NaWock at a Kingil00 PORT MADISON Richmot INDIANRES Poulsco Kaypon Sarmaela $altDack InalOw r, I .S.ei .i'-Bremerton .- Part OreJ d i_ ',' 7. _ SK_AGIT COUNTY SNOHOMISH COUNTY k r1 Ounnp1n j"" utwma �J I a Arlington *Granite Falls MT. BAKER/SNOQUALMIE NATIONAL FOREST . •,. Lake Sbrana Everett'CR DO-� �:'. Lowell O �'&Iv1.4 Pak Plnanursl f1 Intercity a Snohomish a Falrmonl 2 �a�� Gulao kfar a Monroe v / Sultan a Aldawood Mahar lucre Edmonds *Mountlake Tort SNOHOMISH COUNTY Bothell KING COUNTY plchmotid�Konmora is Woodinville •Duvall Kukland aHill R[[[e���dmond a Clyde tlh ... Billbvue%%% Eastg.b • a Nrrwt;aalb • Iswyuntl, a Carnation The Pacific Northwest includes the States of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. Washington is divided into two distinct areas by the Cascade mountain range, which runs north and south through the state. Snohomish County is located on Puget Sound, in the north central portion of Western Washington, between Skagit County to the north and King County to the south. Snohomish County is the third most populated county in the state; behind King and Pierce. Of the total state population of 4,550,000±, 56% reside in the Puget Sound coun- ties of Snohomish, King, Pierce and Kitsap. The county encompasses some 2,100 square miles, of which approxi- mately 43% (to the east) includes portions of the Mt. Baker- MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. Second Quarter 1989 EVERETT. WASHINGTON Snoqualmie National Forest and the Glacier Peak Wilderness Area. Most of the population is concentrated in the foothills of the Cascades and the Puget Sound lowlands. During the period from 1976 to 1980, Snohomish County's population grew from 270,098 to 337,720, an increase of approximately 25%. Population was.393,600 by the end of 1987 and 409,500 by mid 1988; it is one of the fastest -growing counties in the state. The county has increased its population by over 25% during each of the past two com- pleted decades and is forecasted to reach 555,900 by the year 2000, according to the Puget Sound Council of Governments' 1988 publica- tion, "Population & Employment Forecasts". Total Population of Cities.and Towns in Snohomish County 1984 - 1984 1986 1987 Mid 1988 Mid 1988 % Change SNOHOMISH CO. 366,700 381,600 393,600 409,500 +11.7 Unincorporated 204,053 211,661 220,625 231,521 +13.5 Incorporated 162,647 169,939 172,975 177,979 +9.4 Arlington (1903) 3,270 3,330 3,340 3,582 +9.5 Brier (1965) 3,390 4,255 4,520 4,790 +41.3 Darrington (1945) 1,005 1,015 1,020 1,020 +1.5 Edmonds (1890) 27,880 28,060 28,300 28,500 +2.2 Everett (1893) 56,680 59,470 60,100 60,920 +7.5 Gold Bar (1910) 845 770 780 815 -3.6 Granite Falls (1903) 895 955 970 975 +8.9 Index (1907) 142 148 155 184 +29.6 Lake Stevens (1960) 1,740 2,404 2,530 2,630 +51.1 Lynnwood (1959) 23,139 24,000 24,260 25,420 +9.9 Marysville (1891) 6,350 7,070 7,110 7,726 +21.7 Mill Creek (1984) 3,561 4,337 4,610 5,262 +47.8 Monroe (1903) 3,959 3,125 3,300 3,350 -15.4 Mtlk. Terr. (1954) 16,020 15,590 16,060 16,200 +1.1 Mukilteo (1947) 4,945 5,390 5,560 5,860 +18.5 Snohomish (1883) 5,500 5,500 5,700 5,790 +5.3 Stanwood (1903) 1,555 1,630 1,635 1,835 +18.0 Sultan (1905) 1,750 1,860 1,890 1,900 +8.6 Woodway (1958) 890 855 860 865 -2.8 Source: Washington State Office of Financial Management, Olympia, July 1988 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINC;TCIN Burlington Northern Railroad provides rail linkage with the rest of the Continental United States; the City of Everett is Burlington- Northern's western terminus. Interstate Highway 5 (the major north -south arterial on the west coast), and Interstate Highway 90 (a major east -west arterial), provide freeway links with the rest of the country. Interstate Highways 5 and 405 provide direct and efficient connections between Snohomish County, Seattle and the "Eastside" met- ropolitan area to the south. Highway travel time and distance from Everett to major points north, east and south are as follows: To Hwy. Miles Hrs. Driving Seattle, WA 25 0.5 Spokane, WA 297 5.0 Portland, OR 203 3.5 Vancouver, B.C. 114 2.0 Air transportation is available at the Arlington Regional Airport and at Paine Field, the Snohomish County Airport. Commercial airline travel, however, centers on the Seattle -Tacoma International Airport, about 40 miles south of Everett. Puget Sound's maritime climate provides the region with cool summers and mild winters, resulting in the area's reputation for outstanding quality of life and exceptional recreational opportunities for both permanent residents and visitors. Popular outdoor recreation ac- tivities include, among many others, boating, fishing, hiking, snow skiing and hunting. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT wAgH1Nr.T0N Temperatures Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Average low 33 36 38 41 46 51 54 54 50 43 37 36 Average high 45 50 53 57 63 68 72 72 68 60 50 47 Avg. Rainfall 3.8 3.8 3.7 2.7 2.6 1.8 1.2 1.7 2.1 3.2 4.6 5.2 (inches) 36.5 inches average rainfall per year over past 10 years. Historically, Washington State's economy has been tied to agriculture and resource -based industry. The harvesting and processing of forest products such as lumber, plywood, pulp, and paper for western U.-,.S. and export markets, have been particularly important to the region. The major deep water ports in Bellingham, Everett, Seattle, and Tacoma on Puget Sound have played a large role in exporting these re- source -based products. The State of Washington enjoys highly devel- oped hydroelectric resources, which provide the relatively low-cost energy needed for aluminum refining. These resource -based industries account for over 30% of Washington's manufacturing sales. The trend of the local economic base has been toward non -resource - based industries such as machinery and equipment, motor vehicles, shipbuilding, electronics and aerospace manufacturing. These manufac- turing activities now make up the bulk of the Pacific Northwest in- dustrial base. This shift away from resource -based industries began with the opening of the Boeing Company's 747 assembly plant in 1967. The Boeing Company employed approximately 3,300 people when it began operation of the 747 assembly plant. In early 1969 employment reached a peak of 25,200 only to drop below 4,000 during the sharp recession experienced in the Puget Sound region in the early 19701s. Boeing em- ployment has climbed steadily since then, reaching a peak during the MACAULAY 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. l :2 1979-1980 period. Falling profits among the world's major airlines resulted in decreasing jetliner demands in the early 19801s; this trend however is now reversing. As of April, 1989, 101,500 workers were employed in aerospace in the Seattle -Everett area, surpassing the 1968-1969 peak. The newest com- mercial airliner assembled in Everett is the 767; a medium -range, two -engine, wide-bodied aircraft. A strong demand also continues for the 747 models, including the 747-400. The Boeing Company accounts for approximately 5% of the State's non-agricultural employment and 10% of non-agricultural employment in King and Snohomish counties. According to a recent report by the Washington State Economic and Revenue Forecast Council, employment increases are expected to pla- teau by mid - 1990. Demographic trends from the 1980 Census reveal that 30% of the county's population is between the ages of 18 and 34, demonstrating a young consumer market and work force. Size of the average household in the county is 2.235 persons. During 1987, the Seattle -Everett met- ropolitan area experienced continued expansion of its employment base and personal income, remaining an island of prosperity in an other- wise slow -growth state economy. Non-agricultural wage and salary employment in the Seattle PMSA (King and Snohomish Counties) exceeded 1,000,000 in March of 1989; 5.8% above the level of a year ago. Total labor force was 1,063,800 and unemployment was 4.6%, as compared with 5.4% nationally in March of 1989 and 5.3% for the region one year ago. The Seattle PMSA added 56,000 wage and salary jobs between March 1988 and March 1989. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. The following partial list of major employers in Snohomish County in- cludes many companies representative of western Washington industrial activity: Associated Sand & Gravel Co. Bayliner Boats Boeing Airplane Co. City of Everett Everett Community College Everett School District #2 Everett General Hospital Everett Herald, The General Telephone Co. of the NW Honeywell, Inc. Hewlett Packard Co. Intermec Corporation John Fluke Manufacturing Co. Nord Division of Jeld-Wen Providence Hospital Safeway Stores Scott Paper Company Snohomish County Government Snohomish County PUD #1 Deep water ports on Puget Sound, an arm of the Pacific Ocean, and the Columbia River are significantly closer to Japan and other North Pa- cific destinations than U.S. ports located further south. His - tonically, Snohomish County's deep water port in Everett has been de- voted to pleasure -boat moorage, log exporting, and aluminum raw material importing; however, the Port of Everett has recently been aggressively seeking diversification in waterfront activities. Portions of the Port of Everett's Norton Terminal, capable of berthing deep water vessels, have been acquired by the U.S. Navy as part of a plan to site a Strategic Carrier Battle Group Homeporting base on Port Gardner Bay. The remainder of the waterfront industrial property and required submerged land has been purchased or is under contract for acquisition. The Weyerhaeuser Company's pulp mill site was purchased by the Port of Everett for substitute log loading and to provide further opportunities for diversification of the port's activities. The Port of Everett currently has eight terminal berths, a 35-ton capacity container crane, several smaller cranes, 23 acres of cargo MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD assembly area, and a variety of commercial fishing berths, recre- ational boat moorages, machine shops and a boat repair yard. Develop- ment and waterfront access plans tied to the proposed U.S. Navy homeporting site are currently under consideration by the port and the City of Everett to provide improved access and increased inten- sity of use along the Everett waterfront. Because of its unique location relative to the densely populated Se- attle metropolitan area, along with the excellent deep water port --:at the western edge and recreational -oriented activity in the Cascade Mountains to the east, Snohomish County has excellent potential for future growth and expansion. Eldec Corporation has established a branch facility at the intersection of the Bothell -Everett Hwy. and Interstate Highway 405, with an employment base of approximately 400. Advanced Technology Laboratories (ATL) completed construction of a new facility at this same intersection, employing 1,200±. In addi- tion, Honeywell Corp., operating the first and second phases of their new facilities at Harbour Pointe (south of Mukilteo), currently em- ploy 1,150 people in the division and expect this number to grow to 1,600± by 1990. Hewlett Packard completed a $25,000,000 instrument division facility on a 133-acre site near Lake Stevens which now has an employment base of approximately 850. The John Fluke Manufacturing Company also ex- panded its operation on Seaway Blvd. in southwest Everett, where re- cent street and utility improvements have spurred additional light industrial/campus office park development in an area which is becom- ing known as the northern terminus of the Technology Corridor. MACAULAY 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. 0 Real estate sales activity in the county, on the decline between 1979 and 1982, is again on the upswing. This trend is illustrated in the following tables documenting excise tax paid on Snohomish County real estate transactions and recent platting activity creating new single family residential subdivisions: Snohomish County Real Estate Excise Taxes Year 1% RE Excise Tax 1975 2,677,117 1981 7,960,747 1982 6,686,629 .1983 9,676,349 1984 11,660,204 1985 11,422,303 1986 16,199,065 1987 17,706,620* 1988 23,164,454 * Rate increased to 1.34% effective May 18, 1987 Source: Snohomish County Treasurer's Office Plat Activity Formal Plats Lots Year Recorded Recorded 1984 47 1,236 1985 31 452 1986 76 1,748 1987 83 2,142 First 9 months 1988 45 1,278 Data on the following map are aggregated by township. The first line in each township shows plat activity during the first nine months of 1987 and the second line during the first nine months of 1988. This data, compiled by the Land Development Information System, King County Planning and Community Development Division, is published in the Seattle -Everett Real Estate Report. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. RAE R.5E R.6E R.7E T.32N Although employment in the forest products industry decreased mod- estly in 1988, the dramatic restructuring of the early 1980's has caused the industry to regain competitiveness in both domestic and world markets. Total forest industry employment in Washington State, including paper, lumber and plywood, was 57,400 in 1988, as compared to 56,400 in 1987 (Source: Marple's Business Newsletter). The indus- try is approximately 20% smaller than at the 1978-79 peak, but has increased 10% since bottoming out in 1982. Forest -based employment accounts for about 4.5% of all wage and salary jobs in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Although speculative, the outlook for the Puget Sound region is to- ward an expanding economic foundation and greater stability of the growing employment base. Development of a U.S. Navy homeporting base on Port Gardner Bay in Everett, in accordance with plans and schedule of the USN, will have a significant positive impact on the area's economy. If the plans become a reality, preliminary estimates from the Final Environmental Impact Statement are for the phasing -in of approximately 8,300+ military and 475 civilian jobs. In summary, the primary regional industries of agriculture, forestry and aerospace are continuing to provide a strong economic base for Snohomish County. Service and technological manufacturing industries add further diversification and will tend to ameliorate the widely fluctuating business cycles experienced in the region in the past. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. " NEIGHBORHOOD DATA The neighborhood encompassing the subject property is bounded to the north by Casper Street, to the east by 9th Avenue South, to the south by Edmonds Way (Highway 104), to the southwest by the community of Woodway and to the west by Puget Sound. Highway 104 runs in a north- westerly direction from the King -Snohomish County line. It connects with Highway 99 to the east and beyond to Interstate Highway 5. High- way 104 ends at the Edmonds -Kingston Ferry Terminal, which is ap-. proximately 1-1/2 blocks from the subject property. Other major arterials within the described area are 9th Avenue South, at the eastern boundary and 5th Avenue South. Major east -west arteri- als are Main Street and Casper Street which connect with 196th Street SW, a major arterial running through the City of Lynnwood to the northeast. The City of Woodway, located to the south and west, is a highly pres- tigious neighborhood of good to excellent quality homes on large acreage tracts. Properties located to the west of the subject include land owned by the Port of Edmonds and numerous commercial properties with marine -oriented uses. Some condominiums, offices and restaurants are also found in this area. City parks in the area include the Edmonds City Park, directly south of the subject property, and Yost Park, just east of the described subject neighborhood. Other significant features of the area include Stevens Memorial Hospital to the east, proximity to Highway 99, and Edmonds Community College, which is approximately 1-1/2 miles northeast of the subject neighborhood. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. FVFgFTT WACNUIr Tnr.i Significant features within the described neighborhood include the downtown business and shopping district of the City of Edmonds, in- cluding the "Old Mill Towne" at the intersection of Dayton and 5th Avenue South, and the Edmonds Civic Center, which is approximately 5 blocks northeast of the subject property between 5th and 6th Avenues, where they intersect with Bell Street. Properties in the southern portion of the described neighborhood con-.. sist primarily of single-family residences with a mixture of condo- minium and apartments. The northern portion of the neighborhood con- tains mostly single-family homes. The downtown core area of the City of Edmonds consists of a mixture of commercial properties, of various types including small office buildings, restaurants, small shops and stores. Most of these are old structures maintained to preserve their "old world" appeal. Located in the subject property's immediate neighborhood to the south is a waste water sewage treatment plant operated by the City of Edmonds. This plant is currently being renovated at a cost of $34 million and work is scheduled to be completed in 1991. West of the subject property are the recent developments of Harbor Square and the Edmonds Shopping Center which includes a Safeway store. Northwest of the subject property is the Edmonds -Kingston Ferry Terminal. To the east is an office building, condominium project and some older office/warehouse properties.. Adjacent to the north are some old single-family homes that have.been converted to a law office and CPA firm. Further to the north are two MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINrT0N :.;1) large mid -rise office buildings and a U.S. Post Office. An additional amenity of the area is the good Puget Sound, Olympic Mountains and island view. In summary, principal amenities of the subject neighborhood are con- venient access to Interstate Highway 5 via Highway 104 (Edmonds Way), proximity of the Edmonds -Kingston Ferry Terminal,. proximity of down- town Edmonds, and the fair to excellent views. The neighborhood is experiencing an upward trend in property values, which is expected to continue and enhance the subject property in the future. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON L" l BITE DATA Location Two separate subject sites are considered in this appraisal. The first is at the northwest corner of 2nd Avenue and James Street and the second is south of James Street, north of Dayton Street, west of 2nd Avenue and east of Highway 104. For purposes of this appraisal, a portion of the second site is being appraised with the first de- scribed site, due to the presence of a parking area on the site that is required for the improvements. size/Area The property on the northwest corner of 2nd Avenue and James Street is rectangular in shape with dimensions of 90'x 1201, or 10,800 SF. The second site is irregular in shape and has approximately 220' of frontage on Dayton Street, 376.16' on 2nd Avenue and 186' of frontage on James Street. Total area of the site has been calculated at 92,600 SF and in this report, 31,297 square feet are considered in Parcel No. 1, and 72,103 SF are evaluated in Parcel No. 2. Access No legal access can be obtained to Highway 104, even though the property fronts on said highway. However, all of the subject property has good access via 2nd Avenue, Dayton Street and James Street. James Street dead -ends at the end of the subject property. An alley borders the western edge of Parcel 1 (the northwest corner of 2nd Avenue and James Street). MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON Topography Topography of Parcel No. 1 slopes moderately from east to west. The land at the southwest corner of 2nd Avenue and James Street slopes moderately from northeast to southwest. The remaining portion of land slopes slightly from east to west. soil conditions A soils analysis was conducted in December of 1976 by Neil H. Twelker & Associates on the property between James and Dayton Streets. The engineer concluded that the property was covered with 2' to 7' of silt and fill. It was recommended that construction either be on piers or that unstable filled layers be removed prior to construc- tion. The improvements at 141 Dayton Street show signs of settlement which reportedly occurred primarily during a 1965 earthquake. No soils analysis was prepared for the office building site located at 130 2nd Avenue. However, based on existing construction on the site and other commercial construction in the area, it is assumed that this parcel has sufficient soil bearing qualities to support the improvements. Utilities All City of Edmonds utilities are available to the sites including public water, electrical power, sanitary sewage disposal, telephone service and natural gas. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON ,-o• 1 1 N `ir 4L, r 1 �'h� � � � �br+1 � 1' C7 • J r % t 13 .s A�. a IV v v' \° �� J j 'o 12 / Air J � O '14o Q� 3 / V yr D z .p / 00 dO _pad °7 e,.. 1 ip C ° / t d i / J B 6/OI °t 3 "�" EL CA?/TAN (a comu b 1_052- t ol7 B _017 r � � �6r 2J �•Odl I I-uf:-040 4-01./ 4-031 "'0a3E.' 7 • oe.7 "1 �4-09+ - DAYTOM ST. T CITY SEWAGE p/ , 4-057 14-uSOI PDJ OF TREATMENT A>d. S. b -- - - 1 _ I-o7/ - - 4.c77 EDMONDS PLANT I �1 4-009 �-uH7 �- - - Iro72 - - q o9S 1 4-O6L -- - 'f •07V JAS7°f_R 1� 4 r.7♦ — - - - - -- SUN.106h1/ 1 1 I• c� R 4 -074, 4 ..80 (ss05) ER 4 - - - - - - - ' / 1 l e 4•i1L q-,os ALDER ST-�3� Ary l� e 4-//7 _ _ _ 4_rr 7 SUYSf. T 4 /2 0 i1H Flat Map MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. — EVERETT• WASHINGTON IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON '2 5 IMPROVEMENTS SKETCH MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON Improved Sales Map I ly al I w 0 9 cl) AM a L 07. 9 0, 7. . ....... ao A 2 0 0 t3 Ao -Z:w --;rT Ali An 71 L t3 -0 -TV sv. izr ffy 7 A 4z j '5-f/ -J- 41 0 1po A MACAULAY 8, ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT WASHINGTON -Y":,'w , .,., �, - r rr r'fdnf� r ..:,may,:-.,v:+•; �'x w '+ � ��x ✓ � a+r#r ate,`", � � U '"` K'"' *' „„ Yar _� ...,!yyC +�at.."� .r«}pf',..: i}3y _•i:'u' .+ :�.. -a ....- .. .. '1 it -`.: "•�.:i; ;ui �.. w )L a�i ���= G c .p Y. �w • � Q r 1 �+ IMPROVED SALES ;L !I ". i y. � t 5 A 1 •,�t„n"'a r-'-`S" �r�y x}�+.�>}�":v r. . Improved Sale No. 3 SHEEP Ohl\ CO. •l'FPlI'` CENTER Improved Sale No. 4 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON IMPROVED SALES 3 � ... ........... :3ji1 •_+''�Z7�rfa � •s r art '�' ti Jk ; Qbai Improved Sale No. 5 Improved Sale No. 6 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON EVERETT. WASHINGTON EVERETT. WASHINGTON IGI �'y•' �_ � •'y�'t'�.-"tom • Ly ? ! 4 1- _ � _:--r+�{tjj � t. Yam'.• ... ..�'- , • " . f,� �y '. "It ♦r` IMPROVEMENTS DATA General Overview - Parcel No. 1 The site is improved with a 3 `story -building with ' , 444 SJ"_°_in_ the : ontiial :b uiidin --- - -- - - -- 196.0l - g f - g built- in-- , yand--li, 296 SF in any: addition built in j -- x r- - �19841:-82Al—`-so,. a -third floor -apartment unit of -very good condominium.. - - - -c .-- -- _--- - -.V quality _was added - in 19.8.1-82. Thn4unit--contains- 3,_4.9r84square- feet of living area. Additional land and -parking for 36 cars_._are also consid- ered in this section. Component Description Year built: 1960 (remodeled in 1981-82) Foundation: Steel reinforced concrete. Frame: The original building was constructed of con- crete blocks, with roof supports provided by laminated beams and tongue and groove ceil- ings. All of the 1981 to 1982 additions are tilt -up construction. Roof support is pro- vided by heavy crossbeams. Interior finish: First level or basement finish consists of orange -peel finished plasterboard walls and ceilings, with some sprayed acoustical ceil- ings. Floors typically, are unfinished con- crete. The second level, or main floor, has orange -peel textured walls and ceilings, car- peted floors and baseboard electric heat. The area is mostly open with minimal partition- ing. Ceilings are tongue -and -groove wood fin- ish, with laminated beam roof supports. The third floor consists of a large living unit which most closely resembles a very good quality condominium unit. Floors are of good quality carpeting, vinyl or slate. Interior walls are of textured plasterboard construc- tion. Extra features include skylights, a large jacuzzi, wet bar, pantry, walk-in clos- ets, central vacuum system and a full compli- ment of kitchen built-in appliances including range and oven, dishwasher, disposal, fan and hood and built-in refrigerator. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. —J ; EVERETT, WASHINGTON Mechanical Systems: A portion of the improvements is heated by a heat -pump system. Equipment for security sur- veillance and fire detection has also been installed. Automatic garage door openers ser- vice the basement parking garage. Plumbing: A kitchen is located at the northeast corner of the second floor and there is ample restroom facilities provided for employees. The top floor unit has one full bath, one 3/4 bath, three 1/2 baths, extra shower and ba- sin, jacuzzi, wet bar and kitchen plumbing. Elevator: A 2,100 lb. 13-passenger Dover hydraulic el- evator serves all floors. Parking: Ope pa�rkngis available for 36 cars in an. asphalt covered 10"t. There are two garage ?spaces at the' basement level. - Floor Plan: The top floor is an apartment which has a living room, dining room, kitchen, library or den, entry, utility room, storage room, two bedrooms and several bathrooms. Second level areas include accounting depart- ment, reception area, .layout and design de- partment; typesetting area, editorial area and conference room. First floor areas include garage space, printshop and dark rooms. Condition: Good. General Overview - Parcel No. 2 Parcel No. 2 is improved with a 951x 100' building that is con- structed in many ways like a market or food store. Approximately the front half of the building is used for office area, while the rear portion is used for storage and eating area with bathrooms and kitchen. Adjacent to the main building is a 501x 100' "Butler Build- ing" used as warehouse space. Ample asphalt -covered parking is pro- vided on the eastern portion of the property. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON M Year Built: The main building was constructed in 1963. Foundation: Concrete slab with asphalt floor in the ware- house portion. Frame: Concrete blocks with laminated roof beams in the main building. Construction of the ware- house is heavy I -beams. Ceiling clearance is 14' to 161. Exterior Finish: The improvements are of concrete block con- struction except the warehouse portion, which is constructed of prefabricated metal. The main building has a glass storefront with.. brick and stone veneer on the east and south sides. There is a shake -covered mansard 'on the building, while most of the roof portion is'built-up. Interior Finish: Interior floors are of asphalt tile or carpeting. Walls are painted plasterboard and ceilings are tongue -and -groove slats. Fluorescent lighting is provided. Mechanical Systems: Heat is provided by radiators fired by a gas, 15 psi, low pressure boiler. Suspended, gas space heaters are used in the Butler Build- ing. Plumbing: A kitchen and three bathrooms are provided; one men's and two women's. Parking: Parking is provided for 26 vehicles in an asphalt -covered area east of the building. Condition: The improvements appear to be in good condition, overall. Some settlement of the floors is evident, primarily in the main building, but this is not considered to be a major adverse condition. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON ASSESSED VALUE AND TAXES The subject property is assessed for ad valorem tax purposes by the Snohomish County Tax Assessor. According to the Snohomish County Tax Assessor's office and Treasurer's office, the property was assessed and taxed for 1989 as follows: Tax Account # 4548-002-001-0006 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 113 , 4 00 Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 620,800 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 734,200 1989 Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,635.29 Tax Account # 232703-1-059-0007 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 133,600 Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ -0- Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 133,600 1989 Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,571.34 Tax Account # 232703-4-090-0002 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 303,800 Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 198,700 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 502,500 1989 Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,910.15 Totals Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 550,800 Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 819,500 Assessed Value . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . $1, 370, 300 1989 Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16,116.78 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject property is zoned BC (Community Business) by the City of Edmonds. The Edmonds zoning code describes the purpose of the BC des- ignation as follows: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple residential uses as a secondary use 'to business uses. There are a wide variety of permitted uses allowed under the BC zon- ing. Additional uses can also be built with a conditional use permit. Some of the permitted uses include retail, offices, trailer sales, new and used car lots, heavy equipment sales, dry cleaners and print- ing and publishing establishments. For complete zoning regulations, The reader is referred to the City of Edmonds zoning text. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use may be defined as the reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is (1) physically possible, (2) legally permissible, (3) financially feasible and (4) maximally productive. The highest and best use of the land as if vacant and without any building improvements is analyzed. This conclusion of legal use which has the greatest probability of producing the highest value as of the date of valuation, forms the basis of the analysis of land value which is based on this optimum use. The highest and best use of the overall real property is analyzed. Consideration is given to the contribution in of use and value of the existing building improvements to the value of the un- derlying land. From a practical standpoint, if it is not economically feasible to demolish the existing improvements to make way for a more profitable use, then the existing use is the highest and best use, as improved. This may apply either on an interim or long-term basis. As noted in the "Land Use Regulations" section of this report, there are numerous permitted uses under the Community Business zoning. The subject property is located in one of the prime downtown sections of Edmonds and access to the property is good. The height limitation of the BC zone somewhat restricts the improvements that can be built on the property. Highest and best use of the subject property, as if va- cant, would likely be some form of mini -mall servicing the downtown community of Edmonds. Highest and best use as improved considers the MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON remaining life of the existing improvements. In the case of the office/warehouse/apartment on the corner of 2nd and James, it is con- cluded that these improvements are the highest and best use of that portion. In regards to the residual property south of James Street and north of Dayton Avenue, the question of highest and best use is less cer- tain. The improvements could be razed in order to make way for._ a large project utilizing all the available land. However, it is con- cluded that, at this point in time, the land value of the subject property for such a development does not exceed the improved value of the existing improvements. Therefore, the existing improvements rep- resent the highest and best use for the interim time period. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD FVFRFTT WACHINf:Tl1N PROPERTY VALUATION The value of the subject property is estimated by relating the basic economic, physical, governmental, and social forces to the subject property, with particular emphasis on the interaction of supply and demand as analyzed in the marketplace. Three basic approaches to valuation are typically utilized to derive estimates of the subject property's value when market data "-.is available to provide a reliable indication of value by each approach. These are the Cost Approach, Income Approach and Market Data, or Direct Comparison, Approach to value. All three approaches are typically used for valuing improved properties when reliable market data is available. From each approach used, a value is indicated that is derived from the comparative analysis of the relationship of the market data to the subject property. The Cost Approach employs the estimated cost of developing the improvements, less estimated accrued depreciation, if any, to which is added the estimated land value. The Income Approach involves analysis of gross revenues, estimated vacancy and expenses, and the processing of net operating income into an indication of value. Some techniques in the Income Approach utilize the estimated value of the underlying land. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON ,1'! The Market Data Approach entails comparison of features and parameters of recently -sold properties, with adjustments to the sale price for differences between the comparable sale and subject prop- erty to reflect an indication of market value to the overall subject property. The separate value estimates, as indicated by the various approaches to value, are then analyzed based on the availability and reliability of the data utilized in each approach. Placing more weight on the technique given greatest credence in the marketplace and derived from the most reliable data, the value estimates are correlated into a final estimate of value. Land Value - Direct Comparison To estimate the most probable market value of the subject land, as if vacant, direct comparison is made with comparable sales having similar characteristics. This direct comparison approach is based on the principle that a prudent purchaser/investor would pay no more for a given property than the cost of acquiring an alternative property with the same utility. The first adjustment is for cash equivalency; that is, to adjust the sale price for terms of the sale (i.e. real estate contract, assump- tion of existing loan or secondary financing etc.), to the cash equivalent. The comparable sale prices (per unit of comparison) are adjusted for differences from the subject property for factors such as time of sale, location, zoning, and physical characteristics. Each adjusted MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON sale price represents an indication of the market value of the subject property. The comparative weight accorded each sale in arriv- ing at a final value conclusion for the subject property is based on reliability of the data and similarity of the sale to the subject property. Adjustments to the sale price for time of sale reflect the value trend occurring between the date of sale and date of valuation of the subject property. Adjustments for location include such factors as relative development trends, intensity of use, locational amenities and character of sur- rounding properties. Adjustments made for zoning relate to the dif- ference in allowable intensity of use for the land, if supported by demand. Adjustments for physical characteristics include such factors as us- able land area, topography, size, land configuration, ratio of street frontage to depth, soil characteristics, available utilities and ex- isting older depreciated improvements which may have been located on the land at the time of sale. The following transactions and listings are utilized for direct com- parison with the subject land. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON Land Sales Tabulation Sale Sale Sale Land Price # Location Date Price Zoning Area ISF 1 121 Fourth Avenue N. 3-89 $ 106,000 BC 6,900 $15.36 Edmonds, WA 2 149 Third Avenue S. 2-87 $ 134,500 BC Edmonds, WA 3 7610 196th Street SW 6-88 $ 375,000 BN Lynnwood, WA $ 160,000 BN (utilities) $ 10,000 $ 545,000 4 114-116 Second Ave. 8-88 $ 85,000 BC S. Edmonds, WA 12-88 $ 82,000 BC 2/3 interest $ 167,000 Projected fee simple value $ 250,000 5 NWC 2nd Street & Listing Asking Main Street, $ 350,000 BC Edmonds, WA 6 118 3rd Avenue S. Listing Asking Edmonds, WA $ 315,000 BC 8,250 $16.30 32,400 16,200 48,600 $11.21 IU.S0 IL,-1S 12,600 $13.25 12,600 $19.84 14,400 $24.31 14,400 $21.88 7 126 3rd Avenue S. Listing Asking Edmonds, WA $ 170,000 BC 7,200 $23.61 Comparable Land sale No. 1 is located northeast of the subject prop- erty on the west side of Fourth Avenue North. The property sold in March of 1989 for $106,000, or $15.36/SF. In comparison to the subject property, a downward adjustment is made for much smaller size of the sale tract. Upward adjustments are ap- propriate for view, corner influence, site utility and location. MACAULAY 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON After adjustments, the indicated value for the subject land is ap- proximately $16.50/SF for the large subject parcel and $19.00/SF for the smaller site. Comparable Land Sale No. 2'is located one block east of the subject property. It sold in February of 1987 for $134,500, or $16.30/SF. In comparison to the subject, a downward adjustment is made _for. smaller size of the sale tract. No adjustment is made for location. Upward adjustments of the indicated price per square foot are made for time of sale, view, site utility and corner influence. After ad- justments, a value of $16.75/SF is indicated for the large subject site and $19.75 for the smaller site. Comparable Land Sale No. 3 is located northeast of the subject property on a major arterial in the western part of Lynnwood. Total sale price was $545,000, or $11.21/SF. A downward adjustment is made for comparison to the large subject site. An upward adjustment is made for size in comparison to the smaller subject site. A significant upward adjustment is made for lo- cation. Other upward adjustments are required for land value in- creases since the time of sale and for view amenity. After adjust- ments, the value indicated for the larger subject parcel by this sale is $14.75/SF. Indicated value of the smaller subject site is $16.75 SF. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD FVFRFTT WAq W1Nr.Tr%k1 Comparable Land Sale No. 4 is located on the same block as the sub- ject property. Two 1/3rd interests sold in August and December of 1988. Converted single family residences that are used as offices did not contribute to the sale price. According to one of the buyers, the total property value was considered to be $250,000, or slightly below $20.00/SF. In comparison to the subject property, for smaller land area of the comparable. for corner influence and time of sale. a downward adjustment is made Upward adjustments are made After adjustments, this sale indicates a value for the small subject site of $21.25/SF and $18.25/SF for the larger site. In addition to the closed sales discussed above, three listings of property for sale in the immediate area have been analyzed. These properties have asking prices between $21.88 and $24.31/SF. In com- parison to the subject property, all three listings need downward ad- justments for size. Significant downward adjustments are appropriate since they are listings rather than closed sales. Two of the listings require upward adjustments for lack of corner influence and Compa- rable No. 7 needs an upward adjustment for site utility. After ad- justments, these listings indicate values for the subject sites in the range of $18 to $21..per square foot. The value range indicated for the small (10,800 SF) site is $16.75 to $21.25/SF. The most significant value indicators are in the range of $19 to $21/SF. Ample land sales are available to give a good indica- tion of land value for this small site. Only one sale is reasonably similar in size to the subject larger parcel, which contains 92,600 ,I ,' MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON SF. This sale is also the most distant of the comparables, in the western portion of Lynnwood. The adjusted sales indicate a value for the larger site in the range of $14.75 to $18.25/SF. After analysis of the adjusted sales, it is concluded that land value for the small subject site is $20.00/SF and $17.00/SF for the larger site. Total land value estimate for the subject property is. therefore ''as follows: Parcel 1 - 92,600 SF @ $17.00/SF. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1,574,200 Rd . . . . .$1,575,000 Parcel 2 - 10,800 SF @ $20.00/SF. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 216,000 Rd . . . . .$ 215,000 Total Land Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(Rounded). . .$1,800,000 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON to be much newer than its actual age. Considering this factor, it is estimated that overall depreciation of the improvements is 11%. based on a 45 year life and a 5 year effective age. Functional obsolescence is added due to the specialized feature of the large living unit on the top floor of the office/warehouse build- ing. This penthouse apartment has many quality features which make it "living unit specific" and make conversion to office use impractical. Therefore, the market use of such living area would be likely be re- stricted to owner/users. The 10% depreciation is the loss in market value between location in a typical condominium structure and its ex- isting location. Estimated physical depreciation of improvements on Parcel No. 2 is 15%, based on an effective age on G and A remaining economic life of 40 years. The subject property is well located with respect to proximity to downtown Edmonds and other compatible properties. A waste water treatment facility currently being renovated directly to the south of the subject property does not pose any measurable economic obsoles- cence. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT, WASHIN(;TON r� Summary of Cost Approach Parcel #1 Average Class "C" Building - Base Cost -Office. . . . . . .$42.95/SF Average Class "C" Building - Base Cost -Office Bsmt . . . .$35.52/SF Good Class "C" Building - Base Cost -Apt Unit . . . . . . .$56.45/SF Multiplier Adjustments Avg Class "C" Bldg -Office $42.95 x 9,792 SF x 1.037 Comp Multiplier = $ 436,127 Avg Class "C" Bldg -Office bsmt. $35.52 x 8,948 SF x 1.037 Comp Multiplier = $ 329,593 Good Class "C" Bldg -Condo $56.45 x 3,498 SF x 1.120 Comp Multiplier = $ 221,158 Adjusted Cost $ 986,878 Additional Costs Jacuzzi $10,500 Condo/Apt Built-ins $ 5,300 Decking $ 4,000 Site Improvements $17,500 D n Sub -Total $37,300 D C= � D Total Project Cost $1, 024,178 n Add: Developers Gross Margin @.15% $ 153,627 m go D Estimated Improvement Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,177,804 > CA Less: Depreciation _ 0 Physical @ 11% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 106,002 i D Functional @ 10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 117,780 o ..q Z M Estimated Improvement Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 954,022 Add: Land Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 565,000 r P Estimated Property Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . $1, 519, 022 ' ,..,, IRounded: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1, 520, 000 t4 Summary of Cost Approach Parcel #2 Average Class "C" Building - Base Cost-Retail/Whse $37.53/SF Average Class "S" Building - Base Cost -Warehouse $17.20/SF Avg Class "C" Bldg-Retail/Whse $37.53 x 9,500 SF x 0.983 Comp Multiplier = $ 350,474 Avg Class "S" Bldg-Wharehouse $17.20 x 5,600 SF x 1.080 Comp Multiplier = $ 92,880 Adjusted Cost $ 443,354 Additional Costs Site Improvements $12,000 Total Project Cost Add: Developers Gross Margin @ 15% Estimated Improvement Cost Less: Depreciation Physical @ 15% Estimated Improvement Value Add: Land Value Estimated Property Value Rounded: Add: Excess Land Total Value of Property (Parcel Nos. 1 & 2) Rounded: , $ 12,000 $ 455,354 $ 68,303 $ 523,657 $ 78,549 $ 445,108 $ 750,000 $1,195,108 $1,200,000 $ 485,000 $3,205,000 $3,200,000 INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE The market rental value of the subject property is estimated by di- rect comparison with comparable rental data and processed into a net income stream. Utilizing the capitalization rate indicated by .market analysis, the income stream is converted into an estimate of value by one or more capitalization techniques. The value of land, derived from the Land Valuation analysis, may be utilized in some techniques of the Income Approach. Income Forecast Presently, The subject buildings are partially occupied by the prop- erty owner and some of the space is leased. The following chart presents basic information on the existing lease. Summary of Subject Lease Area (S.F.) Rate/SF Comments 7,500 $.36 Tenant pays $2,730/mo. annual 5% escalations Two year, full service lease. Additional lease information on competitive properties is analyzed to aid in the estimation of market rent for the subject property. The table on the following page summarizes the pertinent facts of each rental comparison. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON 5: COMPARABLE RENTAL PROPERTIES Annual No. Location Description Rental Data 1) 209 Dayton Avenue Edmonds, WA 2) Dayton 320 Building 320 Dayton Street Edmonds, WA 3) Harbor Building 100 2nd Ave. S. Edmonds, WA - Two story frame building with 12,100 SF of net rentable area. Built in 1979. Two story building with over 120,000 SF. Built in 1981 Three story, steel frame bldg. with 15,000 SF of area. Built in 1974 $9.50-$10.50/SF, full Service, 0% vacancy $14.00-$15.50/SF. Full service 1-5 year leases 0% vacancy $10-$15/SF, full service, 0% vacancy 4) Harbor Square Mall One story bldg. of tilt -up Office/Retail Dayton St & Hwy 104 construction containing $12.25-$15.00/SF Edmonds, WA 101,000 SF. Built in 1982- Triple net, 1988 3% vacancy. Wrhse $5.40/SF, 0% vacancy 5) Dayton Four 1 story and daylite bsmnt $9.00-$10.00/SF, 330 Dayton St. frame bldg. containing 44 Triple net, Edmonds, WA SF, built in 1968. 10% vacancy 6) Edmonds Bus. Center Two story frame bldg. with $11.00/SF, 145 3rd Ave. S. basement parking, full service, Edmonds, WA containing approx. 7,600 0% vacancy SF of net rentable area. Built in 1987-1988. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON 5, ..1 Summary of Market Rent Comparable office/retail rentals had rates between $9.50 and $15.50/SF, on a full service basis. The high end of the range is for good quality office space with views. Warehouse space leases in the range of $.35 to $.45/SF per month. The low end of the range is typically triple net leases and the high end is full service rates in Harbor Square Mall. Office/warehouse rates require a blend of .the rates for the office and the warehouse/industrial space. The subject property is a combination of several different types and qualities of space and, in making comparisons with the market rental data, appropriate adjustments are made for these differences. Current rent of the subject office and warehouse is considered to be slightly below market rent. Based on study of the rental comparables, it is concluded that market rent for the subject retail, warehouse and office space is as fol- lows: Office - 9,792 SF @ $11.50/SF/year = $112,608/year. Office/Warehouse - 8,948 SF @ $6.00/SF/year = $53,688/year. Apartment Unit - 3,498 SF @ $4.00/SF/year = $13,992/year. Retail/Warehouse - 9,500 SF @ $10.50/SF/year = $99,750/year. Warehouse - 5,000 SF @ $4.20/SF/year = $21,000/year. Total Gross Potential Rent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $301,038 Vacancy and Credit Loss Office, retail and warehouse space in Edmonds currently has vacancy rates in the range of 0 to 10%. Most of the buildings surveyed were MACAULAY 8 ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON !) i experiencing 100% occupancy. Vacancy rates fluctuate depending upon demand and amount of competing new space. At the present time, overall vacancy is about 3% based on the properties surveyed. These properties typically are leased for one to five year terms. An inves- tor can expect a vacancy due to change of tenants. It is concluded that an investor could expect a 5% vacancy, at market rental rates, during the holding period of the investment. Discussion of Expenses The market rent estimate previously discussed is on a net basis with the lessee responsible for all costs of operation of the real estate, except for management and requirements for reserves for replacements. Expense items are based on the experience of other similar proper- ties. Management & Reserve for Replacements A rate of 3% of projected effective gross income is used, recognizing that the owner still has responsibility for building exterior mainte- nance. Reserves for any costs related to the replacement of short-lived items (i.e. roofing) is included in this expense allow- ance. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON The following summarizes income and expenses, arriving at a net an- nual income projection for the subject. Summary of Income and Expenses Gross Annual Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 301,038 Less Vacancy & Credit Loss (5%) . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 15,052 Effective Gross Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 285,986 Less Operating Expenses Fixed . . . . . . . . . . . . Tenant Pays Variable & Reserves (3%). . . . . $8,580 Total Operating Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,580 Net Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $277,407 Capitalization of Net Income The overall capitalization rate is developed from an analysis of sales of comparable properties. It is the ratio of net annual income to sale price. Investigation revealed limited recent sale activity of comparable office/retail properties. The following table summarizes the best available overall capitalization rates. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON capitalization Rate Table Sale Sale Net Overall No. Location Date Price Income Rate 1) Lake Ballinger 12/85 $ 813.,000 $ 92,293 11.40% Prof. Building (Estimated) 7620 242nd St. SW Edmonds, Washington 2) Mill Creek City Center 7/86 $3,915,000 $342,810 8.76% 16000 Bothell Hwy SE Mill Creek, Washington 3) Hilltop Building #2 9/86 $ 855,400 $ 78,694 9.20A 12320 NE 8th St. Bellevue, Washington 4) Forest Park Bldg. IS 9/86 $1,632,618 $154,609 9.47% 14715 Bel -Red Rd. Bellevue, Washington 5) 914 140th Ave. NE 11/86 $ 811,196 $ 78,138 9.63% Bellevue, Washington 6) Northway Square East 12/86 $5,300,000 $519,400 9.80% 2150 N. 107th St. Seattle, Washington 7) Factoria Place 12/86 $3,875,000 $416,190 10.74% 4122 128th Ave. SE Bellevue, Washington 8) 2932 Hoyt Avenue 3/87 $ 325,000 $ 36,000 11.08% Everett, Washington 9) 18505 Aldrwd Mall Blvd. 9/88 $1,477,500 $144,680 9.79% Lynnwood, Washington 10) 18411 Aldrwd Mall Blvd. 10/88 $1,800,000 $162,792 9.04% Lynnwood, Washington 11) 20101 44th Ave. W. 1/89 $1,000,000 $100,701 10.07% Lynnwood, Washington MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON The eleven sales have overall capitalization rates ranging from 8.76% to 11.40%. Most of the rates are in the range of 9.5% to 10.00% Va- cant properties typically have higher capitalization rates than those at stabilized occupancy. Some of the properties listed above are lo- cated in more urbanized locations. After reviewing the data, it is felt the best evidence supports an overall capitalization rate of 9.75% for the subject property. This indicates a value for the sub- ject property of: $277,407 (NOI) / 9.75% (OAR) = $2,845,200 Rounded . . . . . . . . . . . .$2,850,000 Add: Excess Land .$ 485,000 Indicated Value by Direct Capitalization $3,335,000 Discounted Cash Flow A discounted cash flow analysis has been prepared as a check on the direct capitalization method. Certain assumptions and market conclu- sions are required for the DCF analysis as follows: 1) Income is projected over a 10-year holding period, based on mar- ket rent. 2) A sale of the subject property is assumed at the end of the loth year. The sale price is based on net operating income for the llth year capitalized at 10.25%. Expenses at the time of the sale are estimated at 5%. 3) Income growth rates are projected at 4% per year. Expense growth rates are also projected at 4% per year. These projections are - based on a growth rate study that has been conducted. 4) The estimated vacancy rate is 5%. 5) The yield rate is 12%. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON Alaska Publisr,ing Co. - 'iscounted Cash Flow Stabilized �",del NiNUAL kffA LEASE LEASE TEW,14 r3?ACE SO. FT, RATEiSF 11VE45E MGM Ei-u5 YEAR 1 !-EAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YE-* 10 tEAR it Cfiica 9792 111.50 4.00% July 89 July 92 5112,608 1111,112 $121.797 $126,669 $131,735 6137,OM f142,485 $148,164 1.'54,112 $160,276 1166,687 O?i.ceharehcuse F43 $6.00 4.G); July 39 July 92 553,628 f55.3:6 558,0O 560,392 $62,207 $65,320 $67,932 f70,650 573,476 176,415 $79,471 Apartment Unit 3498 $4.00 4.0% July 89 July 92 113,952 fls.552 $15.1-14 115,739 $16.369 $17,023 $17,704 $18,413 119,145 119,915 $20,7i2 F.rtaii!karehecse 95)0 510.50 4.00% July 89 July 92 fS9.75) s1:3,740 $107.S�k) I!12,2v5 $116,693 $121,361 1126.216 $131,264 W,6.515 $141,075 1147.6.54 Ware..cuse 5000 14.20 4,00% _July 89 July 92 $21,000 S21, W 522.714 s23,622 124,567 525,55A $26,572 127,6Z 128,140 429,290 131,0e5 Total Rental Income 6301,038 s:13,480 SU5,603 $738,627 5352,172 5366,259 $380,909 $576,145 f411,991 5416,471 5445,610 Less Vacancy 0.05 $15,052 s15,654 516,2C-0 $16,931 s17,609 518,313 $19,045 $19,807 $20,600 $21,424 522,280 Efiective Eros Income f265,986 1297,426 S309,323 $321,695 $334,563 5347,946 $361,664 5376,338 5391,392 5407,047 f;23,329 Other Income 1^ 10 S0 s0 s0 . SO $0 SO $0 $0 S0 Total incore 5285,9E6 $297.426 $109,323 $3221,05 IM4,563 $347,946 1361,864 $376,3 8 $391,392 5407,i47 5423,329 Less Cperating Expenses i3;) 18,380 $8,923 59,280 Si,651 110,037 $10,438 $10,856 511,290 $11,742 $12,211 512,700 Net Operating Income $277,407 12H,503 f300,043 1312,045 1324,526 S337,507 f351,008 $365,048 1379,650 137-4,636 5410,629 Net Sale Proceeds s0 SO $O s0 s0 s0 SO s0 s0 53,1:8,118 s0 Total Cash Flows 1277,407 f298,503 5300,043 1:12,04.5 f324,526 $337,501 5351,008 $365,048 S3719,650 13,522,954 s0 Yield Rate 0.120 Net present Value SM22,106 Cnerall Cap. Rate 0.0%3 Add: Excess Land 28,543 S.F. X $17.00 = 5:85,231 P=n: ed 5465,000 Total Proaerty Value $3,307,106 Conclusion The two indications of value by the Income Approach are $3,335,000, (Direct Capitalization) and $3,307,000 (Discounted Cash Flow). This range is relatively narrow. Based on these indicators, the value of the subject property by the Income Approach is estimated to be $3,325,000. Indicated value by the Income Approach . . . . . . . . . .$3,325,000. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 61 MARKET DATA APPROACH Direct comparison between sales of improved properties and the sub- ject involves adjustment of the sale price for measurable differences between the comparable property and the subject property. After ad- justments, the comparable sale price simulates the probable sale price and provides an indication of market value for the subject property. The weight accorded this approach in the final value conclusion is dependent on the quantity and reliability of the data available, with less reliance placed on the comparable sales requiring the greatest adjustments. On the following page is a summary of improved properties comparable to the subject which have recently sold. MACAULAY R ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON Market Sales Tabulation TABLE OF MARKET TRANSACTIONS Sale Sale Sale Area/ Price/ No. Location Date Price Age SF SF 1) 3925 196th St. SW 10/88 $ 625,000 1978 6,900 $ 90.58 Lynnwood, WA 2) College Hill P1. 4/88 $ 600,000 1968 9,100 $ 65.93 4807 196th St. SW Lynnwood, WA 3) Elan Building 10/88 $ 680,000 1969 8,826 $ 77405 3810 196th St. SW Lynnwood, WA 4) 18411 Aldrwd Mall Blvd. 10/88 $1,800,000 1983 11,700 $153.85 Lynnwood, WA 5) A.A. Rentals 4/89 $ 775,000 1970 6,002 $129.12 Lynnwood, WA 6) 18505 Aldrwd Mall Blvd. 9/88 $1,477,500 1981 11,780 $125.42 Lynnwood, WA 7) 20101 44th Ave. W. 1/89 $1,000,000 1979 10,539 $-94.89 Lynnwood, WA 8) A.A..Rentals 1/89 $ 715,000 1972 9,852 $ 72.57 Lynnwood, WA CONDOMINIUM SALES 9) Commodore Condominiums #306 $ 255,000 1978 1,544 $165.16 546 Alder St. #106 $ 195,000 1978 1,544 $126.30 Edmonds, WA 10) Richmar Condominiums #101 $ 189,000 1984 1,619 $116.74 524 maple Street #105 $ 191,000 1984 1,552 $123.07 Edmonds, WA ,#304 $ 191,500 1984 1,572 $121.82 11) Harbor Master #302 $ 192,500 1976 1,733 $111.08 200 2nd Ave. N. #202 $ 208,500 1976 1,733 $120.31 Edmonds, WA 12) Laurentive Condos #302 $ 200,000 1976 1,974 $101.32 523 Maple Street Edmonds, WA MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON Comparable Sale Nos. 2 and 3 are most similar to the subject building located at 130 2nd Avenue South. The others are more closely compa- rable to the property located at 141 Dayton. Sale Nos. 1 and 8 are considered the best indicators of value for the retail/warehouse building. The two comparables most similar to the main building sold for $65.93 and $77.05 per square foot. These buildings are slightly smaller, re- quiring downward adjustments, but they also require upward adjust- ments for quality of construction and view. After comparing the two sales to the subject main building, it is concluded that the evidence best supports a value of $70/SF for the office and warehouse portion. Applying this rate to the 18,740 square feet of the subject building indicates a value of $1,310,000 for this portion of the subject prop- erty. The retail/warehouse building comparables sold from $72.57 to $153.85 per square foot. Sale Nos. 4 to 7 are strictly retail buildings lo- cated in the Lynnwood shopping district. The best comparables indi- cate an unadjusted value range of $72.57 to $90.58/SF. These comparables are adjusted downward for building size and upward for location. Sale No. 8 is adjusted upward for the large amount of ware- house space. After adjustments, it is concluded that the market value of this portion of the subject property is $90/SF. Applying this rate to the 14,500 SF contained in the building indicates a value for this portion of the subject property of $1,235,000. Comparables for the penthouse apartment are condominium sales in standard condominium projects. These are good quality condominiums in the City of Edmonds with average to excellent views. The range of MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON value is from $101 to $165/SF of building area. In comparison'to the subject unit, these condominiums are much smaller and require sub- stantial downward adjustments of the price per square foot indication for this factor. Additional downward adjustments are needed because the comparables are within condominium projects rather than situated above an office/warehouse building. It is estimated that the subject apartment has a value of $80/SF. Applying this rate to the 3,498 SF in the sub- ject unit indicates a contributory value of the penthouse of $280,000. Summary of Estimated Values Office/warehouse (Parcel No. 1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,310,000 Penthouse apartment (Parcel No. 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 280,000 Retail/warehouse (Parcel No. 2). . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,235,000 Excess Land (Parcel No. 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 485,000 Total Estimated Property Value by Market Data Approach . . $3,310,000 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON RECONCILIATION AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF VALUE In developing valuation estimates as indicated by the approaches used in this report, the appraiser utilized all pertinent market data available. Using appraisal techniques best suited to the data pre- sented and placing greater weight on the most reliable data (i.e. that which has greatest similarity to the subject property), the probable market value range of the subject property is resolved into a conclusion of most probable market value. The market value estimates by the three approaches are summarized as follows: Cost Approach to Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,200,000 Income Approach to Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,325,000 Market Data Approach to Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,310,000 The Cost Approach is a reasonably good indication of market value when improvements are new and land value can be well substantiated. In this case, the buildings vary in age. It is felt that there is ad- equate data to support the land value. The Cost.Approach gives a sup- portive indication of the subject property's value. The Income Approach analyzes market rent, vacancy and credit loss, operating expenses and selects an appropriate capitalization rate. Vacancy and operating expenses are deducted from the gross potential rent. The net operating income is capitalized to arrive at an indi- cation of value by the Income Approach. This technique is considered to be a realistic indication of value. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON The Market Data or Direct Sales Comparison Approach analyzes compa- rable properties that have sold recently and compares them to the subject property. Adjustments are made to compensate for differences between the comparable and the subject property. In this case, sev- eral competitive properties were utilized and this approach gives a fair indication of the subject property's value. In the final analysis, primary emphasis was placed on the Income Ap- proach. The Cost and Market approaches support the Income Approach, but were given less emphasis in the reconciliation. The Cost Approach is less reliable when improvements are old and large amounts of de- preciation must be estimated. Market sales of properties relatively similar to the subject were plentiful but, due to the unique nature of the subject property, many of the competitive properties required large adjustments. The three approaches indicate a narrow range of value for the sub- ject. Buyers of this type of property are frequently most concerned with the property's income potential. Therefore, the Income Approach is given most emphasis in the final conclusion. It is concluded that the evidence best supports a fee simple market value for the subject property, as of July 20, 1989, of: THREE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,300,000) MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON ASSUMPTIONS AND/OR LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. That the title to the property appraised in this report is good in that no liability is assumed on account of matters of legal character affecting the property such as title defect, encroach- ments, liens, or overlapping property lines, etc. 2. That the appraisal is to be used only in its entirety. Distribu- tion of the total value estimate between land and improvements applies only under the proposed conditions of utilization and reflect their estimated contribution to the overall value of the property. 3. That the.maps and drawings included in this appraisal are in- cluded to assist the reader in visualizing the property; how- ever, no responsibility- is assumed as to their exactness. 4. That there are no hidden or inapparent conditions of the prop- erty subsoil or structures which would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, in- cluding hazardous waste or asbestos materials, or for engineer- ing and other investigations which might be required to discover such conditions. 5. Any information in this report furnished by others is believed to be reliable; however, the appraiser assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. 6. The omissions or change of any part of this appraisal without the written authorization of the appraiser invalidates the en- tire appraisal. 7. No requirements shall be made of the appraiser for testifying or attending in court by reason of this appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been made previously therefor. MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned appraiser, do hereby certify that, except as oth- erwise noted in this appraisal: 1. I made a personal inspection of the subject property, including the significant visible components, on <>, 1989. 2. I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in the appraisal report are true and correct. 3. I further certify that the reported appraisal analyses, opinions and conclusions are limited only by the reported qualifying con— ditions and are my personal, unbiased, professional analyses, opinions and conclusions. No one provided significant assistance to me in the preparation of this report. 4. I further certify that I have no specified present or prospec- tive interest in the appraised property and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the properties involved. My compensation is not contingent on any action or event resulting from the analyses, opinions or conclusions in, or the use of, this report. 5. The appraisal analyses opinions and conclusions were developed, and this appraisal report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics, the Stan- dards of Professional Practice of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and the Society of Real Estate Appraisers. 6. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and the society of Real Estate appraisers relating to review by it duly authorized representatives. 7. I do not authorize the out -of -context quoting from or partial reprinting of this appraisal report. 8. Further, neither all nor any part of this appraisal report shall be disseminated to the general public by use of the media for public communication, without the prior written consent of the analyst signing this appraisal report. It is my opinion that the market value of the subject property ap- praised herein, as of <>, 1989, is concluded to be: THREE MILLION THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,300,000) MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Allen C. Nelson, Appraiser MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES. LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON QUALIFICATIONS ALLEN C. NELSON EDUCATION 1963 - 1966 Ballard High School, Seattle, Washington Diploma 1966 - 1968 Shoreline Community College, Seattle, Washington Associate of Arts and Science 1968 - 1970 Central Washington State University, Ellensburg, Washington Bachelor of Arts Degree EMPLOYMENT/EXPERIENCE 1/86 - present: MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Everett, Washington Appraisal of commercial, residential and multi -family properties. 2/84 - 12/85 CONGER & CLARKE Bellevue, Washington Appraisal of commercial and multi -family properties. 2/77 - 2/84 A & R APPRAISAL, Self-employed Seattle, Washington Appraiser. Appraised single family residences, duplexes, tri-plexes, four-plexes, condominiums and vacant land. 3/75 - 2/77 YERKES do ASSOCIATES Kirkland, Washington 9/73 - 3/76 SNOHOMISH COUNTY ASSESSOR Everett, Washington Assessor. Appraised residential, vacant land and commercial properties for tax purposes. APPRAISAL COURSES 11/74 Course #8, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 7/83 Real Estate Principles, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 9/83 Basic Valuation Procedures, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers 8/84 Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part A 5/85 Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Part B 6/85 Standards of Professional Practice MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON .( l ADDENDA MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. _ EVERETT. WASHINGTON Comparable Land Sales IS i 4r (AR 41 4., .0 C. 13 s v 'ps 4T 0 12 y o 7 b 3 ir 2 of, (j 1 01 C A UAYTON ST MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON Comparable Land Sales r • 1 :{ :PAIN SI SN1 •yam« S f � � 'y ' ' /ylKtmN •l, A oe ' .. • : « " /'`!Y .nf L , T/S] . _ + -+ ,YSSY q� y. 1101" ON, Sw BROWNS BAY - 44 + ; 4 u Is :N 1/ N O P—� •YN ssW 1P0 SI + tA ] U 1 �� r PR. P1 .r31N SI SW QO COUNTY •+' D9 PAIR" ..: .. � I19tN yf,•. �,t va S, Sal •101• SI �M ;j ' —404 • 7 "' ^ ., r -last . ,D,N � .. P• i,rr •. la,l' Sw P, •.w IIISt { IIISI t)ND SI ? t1INo SI { Iw °' /•! In M • 'n �C E= a .S IP}N [ `S .. :1 fM l +War � : i'l IP 1031 11PM si d, 11l0 [ M AYR IV g` f, Nt ' + n rA.+ s II5I n's, r Inn +y 944 ; i IISIn C. . ---� aw . Pi/ atN SO SN IarN: 11 L_ • ^ $ Pa ♦ _ l"w �• c PF•RRINVILLF.^ r IlNlll SI SW - < N n , r + _ (LYNNWfIC)O tUtN n eN 4oY ' 3 � �. ETs •(•Is : :: IS � . I CNy nxNr I4 « . Ste 77 PARK wlN s n S . wMly NA:E 1POI♦N .: .�A. 90,N A .'.W: w01' 4 �' ___... •F ra SW ' l.rll Nnr SIP .! -01,v : �. 119.31 fl N: N .I -, ! ry,,N•ify 9151 Sl� R IPO1N SI PA NK 4DN lk. �I'T O • 1° rot.0 p cw 'r7r]D {1 r S, rP4 SW HQt { N r 1115r Sl 04�}: ytrl N! 1 Iq A^ W d •`sf Sr r + _�+ "�• r ULl r: 197ND � 'tY . SW rPMP WI 0 s,M Ar 'A- 5; a• l{ Y' II VtO {^ . ` IW •Y74D rl ,•,1N0 n Iyy,O h �' 191I0 SI Sw 'P Cry �Q > R'Jdst, 19P1N S11Sw A '1 \yr 1"(WP'rr ] W:n,. ,N Fy�li7r [TMUglil l:M.l4oN •'- 'IPI« , 3�.-1. .,NP,.,I,'•= snw t a.,IM,N S, ` !E S'SwEDM0N WPUGET [ON ST S INIn Si S c� ' \IullOur IN :. • P e �9 1 _ S]S j.ln .� :1 19)ISr$I .i [ 524 �T s � !e .j N! .. iw w1�Putx[ > r•^ �� F S� :. � : N ASPE r6T A N 1 ` -mo t - lW11n SI Sw Sw ?WIN at 9W 1 3 :SIA V - i 701sl St sr ,tt'NIN '�M �` ONC11lN014 `•v 1 EDM()NII$ �'si BRACKET T3 TIP �.� y S, IN Mw INSC IN r CPSC K ON Ar110 S• sw r. N • ] Al>tIU r^ SKI + 14N01NO S MOr•P > _ .� — SW - SW CCC)LIEGE BEACN i ealan P,� vlxaA ;;; Jotbo e + �� 7ot�u + CULIEGE q� �o n : n T7 j NIPD INFO S, Sw fi.: : [ 4p M .ux sY �• wu sr vI N«. ;ti [ h .:] tN tlJR st SIJ P,NE r alN- �.'4.1- . IN _St ' %!�, •rNKf:Uf j.l '• + [ 'J .� I 4:I:aN r N ~' t: � „I J�GIN A • \�[/ - •Ir PARK !UVUNUS stf IIWONnSIT s� )W.I Sw • R,I)t:E 1 '^ A• Y A,± 31 i h.l� SW' P OAYTON I ;.�._ bill $I 5 Pp 1 Nf ID I -1 PARK '�i )GIN 1' .SFArrLF XII IP�. K111N 1 , P HTS t I N n '• MAIN M l�1 an pl I" S > r 70111 sl Sw ! •l ul Pn _ s hF `-- YU P RK i p9^ ^ !U I�Swi 1.01. SII sw x(r h' r In i ,t}►.'f •s t12IM ST SW 104 Nw Ww'! ii0„�, o i •.rxw.l 7 it SNIV..E DN'DOr }IB"31 slN •� ( t i `) S,. • /11IIN P nIVL'K.a WAr NI NI'N N1N11 t`I^ 1` c },T`2 + )+SIN SI 5W P 0"N..StAVNNI` IaUNII h )IPIn n E [ }111N fl : Y1 I.SIF tl /-A �illiin N41 3, '^ IN Iti 51 `Pr ` IISISwS }t6IllSI r. �� I; �k Sw Si sW [ ✓ SI SI 1/`M n t� „3r(dSF 71/tN 1' .+^ INIsON PD ..� _ z _ . _Inx Yk" y S �1" r S,EVENS t- �N.1111 TIN=vsMEMORIALALlSI lr r SI V J >R 1S SI 4, '` 220TN ST SW [ ;; SM Sw\/ Ir 1^ g"uq '..rr. t e � n sw J [ ]»No s, S. oPl y as "n \ ,J blPr.« , • ., � na« . G � J ......_ II17� ` � 711No I PUISNPN PO �� It Wal IPIN 31 + : )7PI« SI 1W^ � ^ r1�in f1 SW I .. 'J71�14i; SI r SN' 9� P 1 E ; m,N b nP,N rnln n sw s,' 1',• i+—,wlXN4 A0 INIK SI stw I _ Yr lYSWP � n A• + Sw r IPIN NIN �P MM .11 j` n sW ]C E ..Mi . a �, ' r]61n n SN ,opll ^ fM [ m '�Ia: 4Dy8 n11n n ►y rn N e` _ _ d„' 1lrr, N Dj• '� 10G n :. -i-ln a t« .•. _ 9 .i- r t 1]OIN st Sw• : � :,3 ={,pl., SIP Lam_ �:r� fTp /-. +• + ♦'r [ i 1 s, Ge r : ''*• t PAA-�' I7 U" ns .. �ro4n nm s7 sw N 7'''s i'- s i [ 7111 (F1 SW ')f{ I a r11-1 >a •"., Pl y1' ^ Pr 7)I51 ft „ y y ✓•—1 � 1 _ : t)«D"' Sl '•^'{ [ � e S)4I1 SI 1 ;r RALLIN I. 4 R1xa [']b Q 31 [ P e }SWD n SW GOII «.S•u5(1, P �� � •d+ . . rLiN MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON COMPARABLE LAND SALES r tlFF� RETAIL m n. oseo k�. ..c �,. c �f 6 - 'sCyJt� �., in tr eta= a ""'. �£ "?m ihu"�u r•i2L'F� i':�i"'1'i'•4� +fia �'h�.-�.���+, T :.� ,..�t�Kf _'.. .�•+�L-T 3�'� °.a i-t y, ti��,'4�� ���_ a `iq''.6.i_, ✓1 ,..t r''�, f3 i, S. ��x•"-A„'h.�id.;rav„ ,a, _, - ,. _ _ .ram _ _ . _ c, . R... r.:la->.aa..r'�4x �.-G".r.',�.:�"t .'. • .: L?7-. ,r.:,.-,�_..}. � � _ _ _. .? ; ?'•- �•� :c`�btu'.os=x.7Jt;i Comparable Land Sale No. 1 145 i Comparable Land Sale No. 2 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT, WASHINGTON COMPARABLE LAND SALES AyM" 01 yt Comparable Land Sale No. 3 e4 w Comparable Land Sale No. 4 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON COMPARABLE LAND SALES `:n� _ , ', .'5... gip. .•'+` '. 'b.�1'Y t .�L {i+ aw vrs a000 Comparable Land Sale No. 5 5 . } a Comparable Land Sale No. 6 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. EVERETT. WASHINGTON COMPARABLE LAUD SALES Comparable Land Sale No. 7 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 1 Address: 121 Fourth Avenue North City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: This area is a portion of downtown edmonds, lying near the northern edge of commercial district. Date Of Sale: 03-20-89 Auditors No: 890320-0361 Price: $106,000 Census Tract: Buyer: The Well Partnership _ Seller: Jack Wiggins Confirmation: Warren LaFon, Buyer Instrument: Warranty Deed Terms: Cash to seller Zoning: BC Community Business Utilities: All available Legal Desc: Lot 4, Block 6,. Plat of Edmonds Dimensions: 60' x 115' Land Area: 6,900.00 Unit Price: $15.36 Per: SF Remarks: A house on the property has no contributory value. According to the buyer the existing residence will be demolished to make way for a 3,000 SF retail/office. Use: RET 893601 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 2 j Address: 149 Third Avenue South City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: This area is in the downtown portion of the City of Edmonds Date Of Sale: 02-02-87 Auditors No: 870202-0187 Price: $134,500 Census Tract: Buyer: The Edmonds Business Center Seller: William J. Beaman Confirmation: Harry Beresford, Buyer Instrument: Warranty Deed Terms: Cash to seller Zoning: BC Community Business Utilities: All available Legal Desc: Tax lot 54 of SE, of SEC 23, TWP 27, RGE 3E i Dimensions: 55' x 150' i Land Area: 8,250.00 Unit Price: $16.30 Per: SF Remarks: Subsequent to the sale, a 2 story office building with basement parking has been constructed on the site. Use: OFF 893602 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 3 Address: 7610 196th Street SW City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: This area is at the western edge of the City of Lynnwood and adjacent to Edmonds. Strip commercial properties and multifamily residences line 196th St. SW. Date Of Sale: 06-13-88 Auditors No: 880613-0409 Price: $545,000 Census Tract: Buyer: James Bakke Seller: Byron Gourley/Billie Sorenson Confirmation: Jim Garland, Agent Instrument: Warranty Deed Terms: Cash to seller Zoning: Neighborhood Business Utilities: All available Legal Desc: Tax lots 144, 145 and 146 of NEk of SEC 19, TWP 27, RGE 4 Dimensions: 162' x 300' Land Area: 48,600.00 Unit Price: $11.21 Per: SF Remarks: Subsequent to the sale, 76th Avenue Plaza, a 13,000 SF retail development, was built on the site. The sale consisted of two transactions. The first sale was $375,000 and the 2nd was $160,000 (AF880613-0410) $10,000 is added for extention of utilities based on agent's estimate. Use: RET 893603 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 4 Address: 114 Second Avenue South City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: The area consists of a mixture of offices and light industrial properties. Date Of Sale: 08-01-88 Auditors No: 880801-0308 Price: $167,000 Census Tract: Buyer: Ron Hansen, Wilfred McLaughlin _ Seller: Thomas Powell/Donald Onstad l Confirmation: Bill McLaughlin Instrument: Quit Claim Deed Terms: Cash/ Two 1/3 interests Zoning: Community Business Utilities: All available Legal Desc: Lots 5 - 7 and portion of 8, Block 2, Gephart's First Addition to Edmonds Dimensions: 105' x 120' Land Area: 12,600.00 Unit Price: $13.25 Per: SF Remarks: The sale was between business partners but according to Mr. McLaughlin were "arms length" transactions. One sale occurred in August and the 2nd was in December (AF881212-0180). The sale was based on a fee simple value of $250,000. Buildings on the site had no contributory value. An 8,000 SF office with 3-2nd floor condominiums is planned for the site. Use: OFF 893604 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 5 Address: NWC of 2nd and Main Streets City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: This area is located east of the ferry terminal in downtown Edmonds. The area consists of offices, small retail shops and condominiums. Date Of Sale: Price: Buyer: Seller: Confirmation: Instrument: Terms: Zoning: Utilities: Legal Desc: Dimensions: Land Area: Remarks: Use: 893605 Auditors No: N/A $350,000 Census Tract: N/A First Western Development Mike Hess, Owner N/A N/A Community Business All available Lots 1 & 2, Block 12, Plat of Edmonds 14,400.00 Unit Price: $24.31 Per: SF A 14,000 SF building is planned for the site but the lot would be sold for $350,000 according to one of the partnership owners. COM Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 6 Address: 118 3rd Avenue South City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: This neighborhood is location in the downtown portion.of Edmonds. Date Of Sale: Price: Buyer: Seller: Confirmation: Instrument: Terms: Zoning: Utilities: Legal Desc: Dimensions: Land Area: Remarks: Use: 893606 $315,000 N/A Fred T. Peterson Mrs. Peterson N/A N/A Commercial Business All available Auditors No: N/A Census Tract: Lots 5 - 7, Lot 8 loss northeasterly 16 feet, Block 1, Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds 120' x 120' •14,400.00 Unit Price: $21.88 Per: SF The property is south of and adjacent to an alley. Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. H.! COMPARABLE LAND SALE NO: 7 Address: 126 3rd Avenue South City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Location Data: The neighborhood is in the downtown portionpf the City of Edmonds Date Of Sale: Price: Buyer: Seller: Confirmation: Instrument: Terms: Zoning: Utilities: Legal Desc: Dimensions: Land Area: Remarks: Use: 893607 $170,000 N/A David Moore Mrs. David Moore Auditors No: N/A Census Tract: N/A N/A Commercial Business All Available Lots 3 & 4, Block 1 Gephart's 1st Addition to Edmonds 60' x 120' 7,200.00 Unit Price: $23.61 Per: SF According to the owner a single family residence on the site does not contribute value to the property. COM Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. �.l Comparable Rentals ICIT -Of T E0G +, �I.Gr r( 57 r7 l MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT, WASHINGTON 8'1 RENTAL COMPARISONS 40 4.'mr-.C.C_ltei.SrCtxp�lr�-�``:.�' � _' - ".k-i� � r�..� aW.1'<.41•;.f L.,N.x•v� Rental Comparison No. 1 Rental Comparison No. 2 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD EVERETT. WASHINGTON 85 :- >. '- ,..,,�d +f, � x Rom,. *•.. h,..�zat�"•.;,"`�' ;: "'e.'i'.` . T -t Y�b 'tl h '1' •+y4h.1 "1+N• •� f' . � [7�.t t9� e*.'?k R t�1� n"-`�t� p ....:•,� � � .�� x Yv �'• � ti:n_ �_Gr " r a Am-`--, < 9 .! r - RENTAL COMPARISONS f f-�U>�-}}- cx-< Sue j"7"t.�" �� ,�.4'Py.5 ,�•��"^�'�4v-'L3: 4'l'�f?�,."1`-d i�.r'� �;.4 3T p } t w:r ,wt..�'j-,.+-" .� •�p'�`� -JT� �L:�i'�{-st"1'�Y�`'lx �• ���Z'�..c.— L',`,•y�t. tt.,,•:-b"v+• p�� �'r-: S' °• ¢h {�""rtr?. F �. r`►.R��.'K`{,h' ?��'� C[� �'`"�'C4Ff`• y d`"',���.�1��`"•>�"o,-�f.,°; - � c A. .�''r� ,�,� r �, r,>"n" �'`,�, .� 1_c4 • E.nes%..�._..,.r�` Ct: �'�iw�r_��I'�• ��k� ki �r �gaz�� �z � �'� �w j�'�', .Yts'o.F���n:� ean•'3_`S1.rs. '�'' *w'.�i.'+c".: Rental Comparison No. 5 •�R�'�vw'ti01.L,1. EE fin•. — — C-- G s _ 4 l � � ' j 4 �rLi�S:a3L...... "g^.:ww.�. 4 u Rental Comparison No. 6 MACAULAY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. rti i. EVERETT. WASHINGTON RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 1 Name: 209 Dayton Street Location: This property is located in the SW portion of the Central Business district, near multi -family residential uses. Dayton Street is a major east -west arterial. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 0 Age: 1979 Stories: 2 Rooms: Units: Description: Exterior Description - Exterior of this building consists of horizontally placed cedar siding, some stucco and wood framed windows. The roof is flat and has built-up roofing. Interior - Floors are carpeted and interior walls are of textured plasterboard construction. Ceilings are of the drop acoustical tile variety. An elevator is also provided. Source: Dr. Mary Nelson, Owner Rental Data: The space is rented from $9.50 to $10.50/SF on a full .service basis. The building is 100% occupied. Leases typically are 1 to 3 years. Remarks: Use: OFF 893601 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 2 Name: Dayton 320 Building, 320 Dayton Street Location: This property is located in a neighborhood of commercial and retail properties near 4th and Dayton Streets. There are views of Puget Sound and the Olympic mountains. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 0 Age: 1981 Stories: 2 Rooms: Units: Description: Exterior - Exterior siding is of horizontally layed cedar with extensive use of glass. The roof is built up with skylights. Interior - Walls are of textured plasterboard construction and there are drop acoustical tile ceilings. An elevator is provided and there is an HVAC system. Source: Rental Data: Remarks: Use: 893602 Rents are between $14.00 and $15.50/SF on a full -service basis. Leases generally run between 1 and 3 years. Some leases are at flat rates while others are stepped. Currently, the building is 100% leased, 700 SF of which will be vacated in August. OFF Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. �:I RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 3 Name: Harbor Building, 100 2nd Ave. S. Location: This property is located on the fringe of the Central Business District at the intersection of Main Street and 2nd Ave. S. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 0 Age: 1974 Stories: 3 Rooms: Units: Description: Exterior - This building has a built-up roof with steel frame and glass curtain walls. Interior - Floors are carpeted, with painted and orange peel. textured plasterboard walls. Ceilings are of the suspended acoustical tile variety. The lobby area has tile floors and the building is provided with an elevator. There is an HVAC system. Source: Rental Data: Leases run between $10.00 and $15.00/SF on a full -service basis. Leases are for 3 to 5 year periods with escalations tied to the Consumer Price Index. Presently the space is 100% occupied. Remarks: Use: OFF 89.3603 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 4 Name: Harbor Square Mall, Dayton St. & Hwy 104 Location: This property is located in an area that has recently been developed with several retail and shopping facilities. It is a portion of the newer section of downtown Edmonds. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 101,000 Age: 1982/1983 Stories: 1 Rooms: Units: Description: Exterior - Improvements are of tilt -up construction with a stucco finish. The roof is built-up and there are double -paned windows in bronze anodized aluminum frames. Interior - Office/retail space has the typical professional office space finish with carpeted floors, painted gypsum wall board and drop -acoustical ceilings. Source: Rental Data: Office/Retail leases are from $12.25 to $15.00/SF on a triple -net basis. Increases are tied to the Consumer Price Index and typically are 3 to 5 year leases. Approximately 3,000 SF of space is vacant. 17,000 SF of,warehouse space is at $5.40/SF/Year. All of the warehouse space is occupied. Remarks: Use: OFF 893604 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 5 Name: Dayton Four, 330 Dayton Street Location: This area consists of a mixture of commercial properties in the downtown portion of Edmonds. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 4,044 Age: 1968 Stories: 1 Rooms: Units: Description: This building is a one story with daylight basement structure. the roof is built-up and there is brick and tongue and groove siding. Windows are wood framed. Interior finish has open beam ceiling and spray acoustical finish. Floors are carpeted or vinyl. Heat is baseboard electric. Adequate open parking is provided. Source: Kathleen Patton Rental Data: Rents are $9.00 to $10.00/SF on a triple net basis. Leases are typically for 3 years with escalations tied to the Consumer Price Index. Approximately 10% of the building is vacant. Remarks: Use: OFF 893605 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. RENTAL COMPARISON NO: 6 Name: Edmonds Business Center, 145 3rd Ave. S. Location: The neighborhood is located in downtown Edmonds. Properties are a mixture of retail offices, apartments and condominiums. City: Edmonds County: Snohomish State: WA Gross SF Area: 0 Age: 1988 Stories: 2 Rooms: Units: Description: This is a 2 story with basement parking building that has approximately 7,600 SF of net rentable area. Source: Harry Beresford, Owners Rental Data: The first floor is owner occupied, average rent for the remaining space is approximately $11.00/SF on a full service basis. Leases are over a 5 year term. There is no vacancy. Remarks: Use: OFF 893606 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. 9:i MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 1 Name: 3925 196th Street SW Location: This area is the central shopping district of the City of Lynnwood. Strip commercial properties are the principle improvements in the neighborhood. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: Portion of lot 18, Block 4, Alderwood Manor r Gross SF Area: 6,900 NRA: 6,900 ` Stories: 1 Age: 1978 Description: One story retail development with built-up roof, shingle covered roof perimeter, store front and concrete block or decorator block exterior. Interior features include HVAC, drop ceilings and carpeted or vinyl floors. Income Data: Sale was based on an approximate capitalization rate of 10.5% according to one of the buyers. Document Price: $625,000 Date: 10-26-88 Auditor's File No: 881026-0337 Buyer: 40th Street Associates Seller: ASI america Equities Limited Source: Ralph Barber t Sales Data: Cash to Seller Land Area: 24,830 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893601 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 2 Name: College Hill Place, 4807 196th Street SW Location: The neighborhood consists mostly of strip commercial properties in the central shopping district of Lynnwood. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: Tax lots 1 & 2 in SEk of SEC 16, TWP 27, RGE 4 and portion of lot 17, Lynncrest Addition Gross SF Area: 9,100 NRA: 9,100 Stories: 1 Age: 1968 Description: one story with daylight basement office building. Exterior features include marblecrete and brick, built up roof and aluminum frame -windows. The interior has spray and drop ceilings, fluorescent lights, carpeting, HVAC and textured walls. Income Data: The building was only partially leased at the time of the sale. Document Price: $600,000 Date: 04-07-88 Auditor's File No: 880407-0210 Buyer: Luther Child Center Seller: Pacific Funding, Inc. Source: Ralph Barber Sales Data: Cash to seller Land Area: 28,675 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893602 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 3 Name: Elan Building, 3810 196th Street SW Location: The neighborhood consists mostly of strip commercial properties in the central shopping district of lynnwood. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: 1 Portion of Lot 10, Block 7, Alderwood Manor Gross SF.Area: 11,866 NRA: 11,866 1 Stories: 1 Age: 1969 Description: One story with basement office building and includes older detached warehouse Income Data: N/A Document Price: $680,000 Date: 10-01-88 Auditor's File No: 881001-0005 Buyer: American Property Investment Company Seller: Elan, Inc. Source: Chris Dariotis, Seller Sales Data: Cash Land Area: 40,075 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893603 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. 9(), MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 4 Name: 18411 Alderwood Mall Blvd. Location: The area consists of the Alderwood Regional Shopping Mall and surrounding commercial properties. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: Portion of lots 16 & 17, Alderwood Manor No. 3 f Gross SF Area: 11,999 NRA: 11,700 I Stories: 1 Age: 1983 Description: Single story concrete block and decorator block building with built-up roof and stucco roof perimeter. The building has a store front, recessed fluorescent lights, HVAC carpeting and drop acoustical ceilings. Income Data: Gross income is $178,500, less vacancy of $8,925 and ,expenses of $6,783. Net operating income is $162,792. Document Price: $1,800,000 Date: 10-14-88 Auditor's File No: 881014-0456 Buyer: Wah Lui Seller: One Hundred Ten Partnership Source: Dick Breckenridge i Sales Data: Cash Land Area: 33,975 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893604`= i 1 i Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. i -t MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 5 Name: AA Rentals, 19201 Hwy 99 Location: The neighborhood consists of strip commercial properties that line both sides of Hwy 99. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: Lot 46, State Plat in SEC 16, TWP 27, RGE 4 Gross SF Area: 6,002 NRA: 6,002 Stories: 1 Age: 1970 Description: One story building with built-up roof, shake covered permeter, stone front and open parking area. Income Data: N/A Document Price: $775,000 Date: 04-07-89 Auditor's File No: 890407-0301 Buyer: Seller: Source: Sales Data: Land Area: Remarks: Use: 893605 Costco Wholesale Corporation Annex Partners Public Record N/A 51,836 SF COM Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. 91h i i MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 6 Name: 18505 Alderwood Mall Blvd. i Location: The area consists of the Alderwood Regional Shopping Mall and surrounding commercial properties. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: i Portion of lots 15 & 16, block 4, Alderwood Manor No.3 Gross SF Area: 11,916 NRA: 11,916 { Stories: 1 Age: 1981 Description: One story concrete block and decorator block building. Interior features drop acoustical ceilings, HVAC and carpeted floors. Income Data: Gross income is $153,550, less vacancy of $7,678 and expenses of $1,192. Net operating income is $144,680. Document Price: $1,477,500 Date: 09-30-88 Auditor's File No: 880930-0361 Buyer: Automobile Broker's Corporation Seller: George Barber Source: Kent Clausand, Seller Sales Data: Cash Land Area: 33,975 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893606. Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 7 Name: 20101 44th Ave. W. Location: This area is the Central Shopping District of the City of Lynnwood. Strip commercial properties are the principle improvements in the neighborhood. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA i Legal Desc: Portion of lots 2.1.& 22, block 7, Alderwood Manor Gross SF Area: 10,494 NRA: 10,539 Stories: 1 Age: 1979 Description: One story retail shopping center with open parking. Income Data: $107,129 gross income; less $5,356 vacancy and $1,072 expenses. Net operating income is.$100,701. Document Price: $1,000,000 Date: 01-11-89 Auditor's File No: 890111-0273 Buyer: Po Lee Seller: Premier Projects Inc. Source: George Barber i Sales Data: $261,287 down payment. $738,713 seller financed at 12% interest. Considered to be cash equivalent. i Land Area: 29,000 SF ! Remarks: i Use: COM 893607 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. MARKET SALE COMPARISON NUMBER: 8 Name: AA Rentals, 19020 Highway 99 Location: The neighborhood consists of strip commercial properties that line both sides of Highway 99. City: Lynnwood County: Snohomish State: WA Legal Desc: Tax lot 22 in SW; of SEC 16, TWP 27, RGE 4 I Gross SF Area: 9,852 NRA: 9,852 Stories: 1 Age: 1972 Description: Single story office containing 3,132 SF of space and 6,720 SF of metal warehouse space. Income Data: N/A Document Price: $715,000 Date: 01-05-89 Auditor's File No: 890105-0512 Buyer: J.O.B.B. - A General Partnership Seller: Fred Peterson Source: Public Record Sales Data: N/A Land Area: 50,530 SF Remarks: Use: COM 893608 Macaulay & Associates, Ltd. ".A"M 16:50 S~ - C ITY galIMS1 16.05C.Ow pytfwas Tle SC boss boa the feltaniag specific purposes to adattisa to the Pausal purpesos for bosieess sad eomeorcial sews listed to Charter 16,40. 1. Ts reserve arcs ter class retail stoesa, Offices. serVies mstabdiab- esata gad O&A"weat Mtablisbssts mbieh *fist goe" and metric" to e be sat t r• toss wal y. S. To odors compact, eoersaisst development patterns by alloriog soma that are operated ehiefly eritbia buildings. C. To allow for eulttpls residential so" as is secondary use to bucises$ mesa. �.».010 vsta J_ tery!ttel rris; rt Goes. i. Slagle -rosily deeelltag..s rowlsted is U-6 sass. 2. Satatl stores, offices and service moss. saclsdiag istease same. such as trailer galas, used ear late (except as pert at a asp ear miles mad service d &Lew), sad bm.R ogaipsmst "Las and services. 7. Ms automobile sales sad service. 1. Dry cleaning and Laundry plats ubit► wee ealy sonflasmabla and ewossplos:w C1*a.-dai aqua- S. priatiog, psblisbing and ►lading establiebsents. 6. Sea stop saclters. S. ibreltte4 Secoasderr Goes. 1. Usited "Osawy, T*Wr er tabeieatiss of iuods laeidsstal to a permitted er eomditiaasl WW- I. Off-street psr!<tK swd lsedin srw to serve a permitted sr ew- LStioasi use. 3. Tht.ltipla de+oUimg wait$, to the story above the otreot floor. C. Prim-.ry Doer te" I ri tg s Coed i t t ono' l Doe re red. t 1. Ce rcial porting late. 2. ionssity facilities. as listed is the IN dtatrtet. R I. itealsaale so". ♦. Not*&$ sad uvula. S. daaasome" oetahlielaeeesa. C. �metLos bwsimeaaes. owleding vebiele me llewtack ametisaas. 7. Rave-ia 4siume". i. Laboratories. 9. pabetcaties of ltgbt tadmtrial products. D. Sxeoeds rT Dents logo t rimer a Coyne i t loan 1 Due ltirat t . 1. Outdoor stecaga, iacideatal to a psrd.tted or c uditioasl wee. 2. Lircraft loadings as resalated b7 Cuepter, 4.t0 of cbe City Cods. (Ora. 2366 6d, 1941; Ora. 22$3 1S. IOU; Ord. 2266 11, 1992). j6.SG.020 SIT[ 0-rVMDPr'"..,SI =TawDARM t. ble. IUXD t KL3IlM MMSU 01I NaLUM St1RI1M tILtSDM STRESi S= UAS ADM rLAX LOT •RU LOT VERY! SSTSBCL Sl~•!UM Srr"CL meLGeT AYSA R^ lose Sums boos 6e*e1 Rsee1 25,2 lea. tt. Per 84. ft. of lot area lrif toss feet few lot limes adjacent to S sowd property. 2wMf Daly any ast*ad five feet above the stated bow. Habit if all pan iems of the roof above the stated height bay a a slope of l' is li or greater. 13. Vie. rrFkiat oaf ber&Lm Seriev. Soo Chaptan 20.60, 17.SC, lead .10. C. VVrkrILT. lo-oltlplo dwal.Uat snits regeiro 3,OW *gums feet Of site at" par suit. D. rr M__f=. The rewired setback from R sonead pm. erty ob&U k per- saneftL4 lands-Ped ritk tree+ and SrouaL cover &cd ps ra»aotitly ezta- tiiaad by the amer of the SC Lot. d sir -foot sieieam bclgt: fen", *all or solid badge shs11 be prori-ed at some point is tht aa:bs<- t. La:— .l.ce trlvrSri.lusernaae. Satellite tolaviaios antee&w she.il !i, u cea ta: t . lc V.aCtioe. iG.20.05: and reviek'z t- tL: lsrehttecLural U"L$a, board. hire. 2S:i $6. 1Sc5J PUBLi�wORKS DEP AR�MEN� , ENG�NE�,���lv � =Ma. THIS PERMIT MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES Applicant to Complete Parts A and B A. Permit to be issued to: fly PL"I l7�; For Work at:(address or vicinity) rQ? Type of Work to be done: �> r(( 0� �2 �j �^ 1• a.. s� a �►-,�o<OJ �.K�J (attach drawing when aDDlicable) Time Required -- Start: Owner: A L" A S Ls, V1 Ali R I- i S LN P' 6- 4 :., _ ,.� ,° • Name _ Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone Number Contractor:_ N J State License Number State -Zip Te ep one Number B. INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division., Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until .the final street patch is completed,.at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is subject to inspection {and rest ration in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is require for '"n e�tion b Engineering. Call 775-2525 ext. 220. q P- P y, I understand that this pe*nit m t be vailable at the job site foZins `ect'on purposes at all times. Signature. Date: e�or Agent TO BE COMPLETED BY ISS-bING�..AGENCY: G Date Issued Issued: j -jf -%3 Permit No.: /ZC_ Fee: Security Bond: Time Authorized: (J C1 f APPROVED CL �iZ 1� 1 S ICI L 2 OF EDMONDS �.� . -_ ._ _ . ASSET Ikir-ORMATION SHEET LJ NEW ASSET NO. ❑ ADDITION ADDITION TO ASSET NO. ❑ RETIREMENT DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION DEPT. NO. 'PURCHASE ORDER NO. _ PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST "PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 8 ) COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. _ q /� ' ��� -/-� - > y 5 -3 ESTIMATED LIFE ,5 IINI I IA tL) by DATE APPROVED BY **SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF.PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY . �ERIEfEO BY - C� DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT PROCESSED ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT BATCH NO. G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE Kp 1 I INITIAL I NAME OF PREMISES �r CITY OF EDMONDS -- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BACKFLOt•! DEVICE- [ CST REPORT i < -,o . I.- SERVICE ADDRESS LOCATION! OF DEV ICE 'o - DEVICE : --�— M nu-faCtUrer Mode Size Serial No. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST__—S� LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST. CI IBC is VAL'r L LDS CHECK VALVE N10. 1 � INITIAL 1. LEAKED ❑ f 1. TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT 2. R E P I A i I R S FINAL TEST REMARKS: CLEAil ;cO ml REPLACED: DISC ------------- ❑ SPRING ----------- ❑ GUIDE ------------ ❑ PIN RETAINER ----- HI,','GE PIf1-------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ DIAPHRAGti-------- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ CHECK V[kL',rE 140 LEAKED CLOSED T IGIIT I CLEANED ? I DIFFEREiITIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE ❑ 1. OPENED AT _ LBS. m� RI_DUCED PRESSURE 2. DID 'IOT OPEN 0 REPLACED,: DISC ------------- ❑ SPRING; ---------- r,UiDE------------ ❑ PINT RETAINER ----- ❑ HIN E PIN -------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ DIAPIIRAG(•I-------- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ C' CLEATED 0 REPLACED: DISC. L!PPF 1----------------=----- Cl DISC. LO;;ER---------------------- L: SPr? I IIG -----------------------.---- D I APHRAGI•' , LARGE UPPER-----------------------•-- C' LO':iLR------------------------- �. DIAPPRAGN, SHALL UPPER------------------------- LO;1N:R--------------- U SPACER, LO',!ER OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT LBS. CLOSED TIGHT----. ❑ REDUCED PRESSUi?L THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIE T / INITIAL TEST PERFORtIED BY OF DATE REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFOP,f•IED BY OF DATE 721 CITY OF EDMON u 250 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771 3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES March 11, 1988 ,n ,� 13Q�„r 2rid+ Avenue ;:Sau tiaJ Edmonds, WA 98020 o SUBJECT: BACKFLOW_PREVENTION DEVICE TESTING Dear Property Owner: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The backflow prevention device in your water supply system is due for annual testing as required by State Code WAC 248--54-500. Our records Show a total of one device in your system. Please have the testing performed by a person holding a certificate of competency as a cross connection specialist, issued by the State Department of Social and Health Services (telephone 464-7674). if a device f.ai.Is its test, please have the riece_ssary repairs made. Upon completion of a satisfactory test, have the certified tester fill out the enclosed Test and Maintenance Report and return it to this office within thirty days:,. Additional information relative to this matter may be obtained by contacting our Cross Connection Control Specialist at 771-3202, extension 291. Sincerely, Archie Brena Water/Sewer Supervisor SH/Ik Enclosures BKFLTF_.ST/TXTWATER PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING • PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING t { _i -.JO 5+00 4-00 r -Tv /!a/� �� - _ �� �M� Q� RARELQ/GATED AS' V .. ��i � �/ •- -%• � /� - -C3 c! s `Cp w 4t M.>r a+n�1= _ � P � If I � ■ G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 4 c c gas Hill ;1 10 if j w! Tf -+rl� tit�, i -T '7T-- it PPI- it i TT. 77 t r 4 .4+ HII slit it*, IT 7. 7 H A :j" +rl- L J itTli T 44-L 4--r 44 —4 -77 .7 if il. IT i I —L-k4- ;is. j. 4' iI WL + T T-111, 717 7 j, I; is ;i, :y ;!I, 17— TI 47— W + is, -4 :.I T t T +t+ :ji Cis h! 00 it tT list it 6ili jf H!i Is; is;, i A, T17 !:j : !P 4T v : III's hi; L it Ills "++ T -7• it 17; 4-rr 717 4T- :4 t 4-w ;7 TT lilt +4r 77- *i it. 4 it 77 L r -. 'tri, T!, 7 7-1, IQ ,aw.��mvw v.ti.+axi++ii':nnrrwrM�ysm..«n..ev..r}.s..+ww.ww•:�..+x:m*e�.vrvwrr*.,tt*w�n`raa .��+nr.+�r✓1*++� .. uN++�narttiN.wsS�»MY»++Rrw+w++rxwYac=wM'afiv-vXv.... .�. .iv'+,.+"pi+�W3'n^s.Ai'�:Yy F� tM.+ym ,• .:t. :: rt.>-Yv:. ..p r'n+.: J:..r; .....x» r ..: n,v�t.' +^'"usar..Y.... Vrvn.. Xrv�n.. l....: r.,.:t .K i"�. . .: . ,., .,i, ,.*,.m , ,xtu»:.arrt ., nsr a. w�.5 u�v .> » W`- v .v . M ,.. -,a. > - . _ r - r. - �''*, -'✓,w � "• w„ .� ... j i � ' � 4 1. �� � f f a' .•-.• ••.,• �.', .. '?;-y, - •, >. ,. ..a..r»u»ras ,x .v_ ..« a« �m...,ue m .r sr �4"7 +r ,. •• " ( "` ,,. - " - ... -' .. ' ' - ..g ,:.. ! t. � "' .. '«..;.; . - . r^rzw..s., ' x...-r.; e,.,.;s� " �=:env.. �-«..:'t � ^ W.W......�.'...f '•""""`: 1 i '.."""a`�' t 14 57 r a F* [{ a x { A w ? A { C j w r-.-.w: .................... __ r <> .3_ ..., ,. r..�...: w...-� ,., t.,x .:e �.wn+.�a ...a....,..... _e, _ ,,,.�...,.,.....«. �-.... .. .. _ ...�.. n .. .., ..., „e ++. ..... City of Edmonds - Permit No: CS? �' �� RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: 3'01 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 1 3 1 2M0 a t S �r1ca•w+0 S v B. Type of Work -(be Pnuc C. Cont Mailing Address: tioow HA 5/4- 501.4 State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ SP D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project JKJEU(PUD, TE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD) ❑ Multi -Family ' ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: :c> F. PAVEMENT: ❑ YES �;NO G. SIZE OF CUT X ' H. Charge: $ CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES NO his/ MCC' IDEMNITY: Applicant, understands by.. hersignature to this, he/s''he Izol(fs 'the'City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against "the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and {, attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. THE' CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERL4LS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC,.(ON AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by -the .City Engineer. Every _ Bagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion° of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with -.,City codes. All 'street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or..City- approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved by: ? � 4 a Right-of-way Fee: f °� G� Time Authorized: Void After j 1 / 3U l . O i Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Special Conditions.:'`R tVf-1C &Q1,tz.0, PEE -: RestorationvFee: '..-_ -4 M WTC1fJ . NOT' IFy �4FfPGTF fZFSIt T '. { J2tOK � Total Fee: -ro ta1 MI ON A LLF_V, AS W9 LL AS PUeuc iAio 5 ;Receipt No: - '77l -U2 3S — 0 2P W wFtN t < T6 Be GN < r"fE 1b VR►F Issued by: `L 1C TIUN = 13Cxt nP ,( t.4 e-A tA(&O 17-eML. i2irelG�S AAtk�nl f 4►n! + LW�tin <ctu tt Mxw. i2P(r11)eF_ f2.UW• P 2'( t'rU s �1-tVDffif S. =ram f LC�A ,r A D- na �l N �� }. UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS (� y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK U' INSPEC R 'S SIGNATURE DATE o 1 For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout. R RE L I A *9 A RY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY HALLS LAKE AREA LOCATION 131 2ND AV N. EDMONDS 98020 POLE NO. SE 1/4S 23 T 27 R 3 DATE 4/20/01 TASK No. 323314 ENGINEER HA TASK 03 REASON FOR WORK RELOC OH 30 PRIM FOR DRAFTER HA U.G. No. FERGUSON C,ONcrRllrrtnN OF EDMONDS OFFICE BLDG SCALE 1" = 60' DATE PRINTED DATE WORK COMPLETED APPROVED FOREMAN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS i ■ EXEMPT ONOT EXEMPT SUBSTATION MAPLFWOOD FEES REQ D R YES O NO PARA. 18 ITEM C CIRCUIT No. 12-343 PHASE 123 RIMARY OVERHEAD O.H. COND. �2=5 Kv RESIDENTIAL ADD CKT. FT. PH NO. REM CKT. FT. 3 PH NET CKT. FT. - SECO DARY OVERHEAD K PH BASIC FEE >.REMCKPH '@S'$ KT. FT. METER/C V. POLE $ PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) PRIMARY U DERGR ND ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ RESIDENTIAL O STATE ❑ COMMERCIAL O COUNTY — C FEE 8 ■ EDMONDS LEU NO. p '@ =S EASEMENTS SECONDARY NDE ROUND ❑ REQUIRED • NOT REQUIRED BASIC EE s '@$ '=S UNDERG UND PLAT DATE RELEASED BASIC FEE FOREIGN CONTRACTS rL FT.0 _ ■ GTNW JPN NO. STR T LIGHTING ■ CATV JPN No. (� FT.0 =$ ❑ JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CATV W K IN RIGHT OF WAY O JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV O RIMARY O -!R SECONDARY TENCILING FT.@z =8 FROM MISCELLANEOUS FEES T POLE VAULT s PRE-CONST. REQUIRMENTS PERMIT 8 O TREE TRIM ■ PUD LOCATOR ❑ BACKHOE ■ FLAGGING 8 ■ ONE CALL DATE 8 8 No. INDEX POLES PLAT TOTAL DUE 8 LOGS U_MAP DATE PAID RECEPT N0. XFMR C-MAP NEW SVCE APPLICATION NO. LOCATION MAP PAGE 45415 LEGEND: O EXISTING POLE 181 EXISTING POLE -TO BE REMOVED • NEW POLE )1( NEW POLE TO REPLACE EXISTING POLE ENGR'S TEL. # 425-51.4-5019 ENGR'S PAGER # 425-347-9722 N 1 2 ' 23 4-88 7 7575 � 75-2356 � 75-2357 z� 75-383 J4" i REPL EXIST 40'P W/45'P; IN -LEAD. 83' NE OF EXIST. (EXIST & NEW) O NAME 30 DE & 12FANC) W/1SW ARMS. SCHEMATIC © XFR EXIST 30, 120/208/7200V BANK (12F603) TO NEW POLE NTS 75 ------------,SER* ----------------- 1 75 ------------,SER* ----------------- 75 ------------,SER* ----------------- XFR EXIST SVC'S TO NEW POLE. RMV EXIST STLT *1565. COORDINATOR STRIP, TOP & ABANDON EXIST POLE TO TELE & CATV. Re Crowleds WIRE REMOVAL FERGUSON 767N 3810CTION RMV (4) 83' OF EXIST #6 CU SOLID PRIM & NEUT FROM ®TO ® . A-23489 ,W 150-354 c v 0 0 0 0 a� i M M N i m ILI 0 _0 0 0 E v w v U 0 E 0 U i 0 z 0 0 N 0 0 i 0 0 m 0 MEMo UNDERGROUND PRIMARY LAYOUT SHEET,°, 2173 1/88 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY LOCATION Znd %a m m Pp v v N T AREA POLE NO. 1/4 S Z3 TZ7 R 3 DATE Z G W.O. NO. REASON FOR WORK -rMST' gAMI>f41l..F' FOQ ENGINEER /7 DWG. NO. (pep Fr;-(Ze-7 USQN 1eQN STK DRAFTER U.G. NO. 9D.56 Eb rn b NDS 0MCC f3 Lm SCALE 00 SUBSTATION /`7APG CIRCUIT NO. PHASE �2'3�f3 zr FEES REQ'D ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ® EXEMPT❑ OT EXECMPT JI YES O NO PARA. 18 ITEM PRIMARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV O RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL ADD CKT. FT. PH PRI CABLE �OF LEO# REM CKT. FT. PH SEC CABLE(') IIT' �OF 7'�ib 1 tftl kL ODA / ® $ / = $ (SPc_ IF I RUN OR PARALLEL & SIZE) NET CKT: FT.. XFMR(S) KVA KVA SECONDARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV _KVA v / V / v BASIC FEE $ Le ADD CKT. FT. PH , DUCT BY CUST OF PVC STEEL REM CKT. FT. PH DUCT BY PUD(!O�OF 4" PVC METER/CONV. POLE $ NET CKT. FT. DUCT PRIMARY UNDERGROUND PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) FUSING AMPS ❑ RESIDENTIAL O COMMERCIAL ❑TREE TRIM CUST PROVIDES VAULT SIZE — BASIC FEE $ PUD PROVIDES I VAULT SIZE 7 18 x�1$ �X 3Tlo LEU# ❑ STATE �/ X�� Dtit / ®$ / _ $ ❑ COUNTY JOINT XING _TEL _TV AUTH / ®$ / _ $ 0 CITY _EPfV)ONO5 LAYOUT LEGEND / / Cl ABOVEGROUND J—BOX El ®$ _ $ PADMT TRANSFORMER IQ SECONDARY UNDERGROUND EASEMENTS ❑ REQUIRED HANOHOLE 0 BASIC FEE $ E# 9 NOT REQUIRED PDMT SNITCH CABINET / ®$ / = $ SECONDARY PEDESTAL 0 UG PRIMARY TRENCH UNDERGROUND PLAT DATE SENT TO R/W 14/0 AL TRX DB SEC CABLE - - - - - - J350 KCM AL TRX DO SEC CABLE —;—;—;— BASIC FEE $ / FOREIGN CONTACTS 188 AL DUP DO STREET LT CABLE — — FT. ®$ _ $ o GTNW JPN# STREET LIGHT O STREET LIGHTING EXISTING DUCT / FT. ®$ _ $ O CATV JPN# FUTURE DUCT — 10 JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CATV EXISTING UG —�— WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY EJ JOINT BORE GTNW & CAN POLE & OVERHEAD UNE EO—"� ❑ PRIMARY ❑ SCHEMATIC LEGEND ❑ SECONAOARY / POLE STENCILING 10, PADMOUNT TRANSFORMER • PADMOUNT TRANSFORMER FT. ®$ _ $ . 30 .FROM TO FEED BUSHING ON XFMR MISCELLANEOUS FEES TAKE Orr POLE AL C NCTRC NEUT OB PRI CABLE VAULT $ PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS J11/0 ' BO% L] PERMIT $ O TREE TRIM .111 PUD LOCATOR FUSE 10 EXISTING OVERHEAD ° $ 19BACKHOE ❑ « 20 EXISTING OVERHEAD $ ® ONE CALL DATE a $ # 3jO EXISTING OVERHEAD o- DISC. SNITCH (NORMALLY OPEN) --� �-- TOTAL DUE $ DISC. SNITCH (NORMALLY CLOSED) DATE PAID STANDOFF BRACKET —� RECEIPT# FEEDER CABLE PULL THRu Box NEW SVCE APPLICATION# LOCATION MAP PAGE L5 LT up JAMES H. REID EROYf. MIDDLETON J11111t. WAYNE JONES CLOYD H NELSON Rea, a 4"Acktw, 17". ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 . (206) 775.3434 May 4, 1978 File No. 7020A P.cCEIVED- Leif Larson MAY 5 1978 City of Edmonds City Engineer Dir. Of Public Works Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Hydraulic Effect of Proposed Sewer Realignment at Alaska Magazine Building. Dear Leif: At the request of the City Engineering staff we have calculated the hydraulic effectsof relocation of the existing 187inch sewertrunk line in the alleyway west of 2nd Avenue between Main and James Street. The existing sewer ma.i:n has a slope of 0.004. As proposed, approximately 172 lineal feet of the existing main would be abandoned, and replaced by 212.lineal feet of new sewer at a flatter slope of 0.0034. Under conditions of the sewer pipe flowing one-half full (Q = 2,000.gpm), the depth of flow at the upstream end of the new sewer segment would. be increased by about 1.0 inch. This increase in depth.would.decrease upstream in a parabolic progression to a probably barely descernible amount at the manhole in Main Street. From this point North the sewer slope is sufficiently steeper that no effect would occur. Under conditions of the 18-inch pipe flowing full (Q = 4,000 gpm), the 40 feet of proposed increase in pipe length would createan additional head loss of approximately 2.0 inches, which would be reflected in a surcharge in the manhole in Main Street of an equal amount. From this point North no effect would occur. Please call us if you have any further questions concerning this matter. Very truly yours, REID:, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2rk ME Morgan ARM/JHR:tlg H. Reid MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING • WATER SUPPLY • WASTE TREAT ENT • SURVEYS G CADASTRAL ENGINEERING AIRPORT PLANNING G DESIGN • MARINAS • PORT G INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT . FEASIBILITY STUDIES LAYOUT LEGEND [� PDMT .XFMR HANDHOL E PRI UGND CA POLE 4 ovHD LINE. . _ _ .. R/ W OR PROP L_I N e U FX5T UGN D CA F.X5T DUCT -- -- -- — FUTURP. DUCT —55 — --0 5AN I'T'=ARY 5EW ER/M H — -- G -- -- GA5 MAI N 6CHEMATIC . LE EN--D 3� XFMR FU5 E FRI UCzND CA Ovltn, EX57 OVHr-> O J-Box t► P i 80Pm -6 U'NDf Ez- caNcr2Et�.�1%1ALIC TRANSFORMER A-Z34 6qT55bZoKVA I2.,4'70 GR0-Y 7200 - 208/IZO-V 5 E iz MAKE'�'-� VA ULT r3PUP Y*, A-�++ �'tl VAULT, �I coven. kl/A $X 3 DIAMOND PLATE LID• CABLE �' 75D Qu�b 1(5� of C'} RUN 5 OF 600t3l%CM ALv SEC. 5 Y T: •Puma -'Ff3-"fA L bµ�`~e•-f��FD-U=G�Fc'�! )_ �5) rLv its 6f-- l000 MCA• Cu. s6 C E�;l CU 5-F DUCT ,..j5,. i d _UT cow5TRUCTION NOTE5 1. IN5717AL,L^ I' PI` 1915E,g O' NEW POLFw` aXT END rRi MARK P, LJ N NORr�1E.A 1' 10 ON �. �, Av 2 FAST I N ALL 'iY 'H EN 50 'FOIE 57 30" Tv VAULT. , 2 1w5T L.L. (2) 411cONCCUIT F oM CUsr. WN vAULT ACROsi ALLEY To THIr W:G t T, ADJACaK FFr, P'F.I�TY. 3. C5 ,"ros~C AL.L, A PHAL `� itJ l �1-iT"-OF- t AY TO ©CIG-111JA ON D I T I O per C 21 Ld N 3 SCHEMATIC NT5 m PR ELIIfil1�NJ 1351 mm PUBLIC U jI y DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY V S• /� ,t�+� 3/91 5OUTH COUN ( IAREA t LOCATION\1.240 — 4 POLE N0. `'• '5,E• 1/4 S P-3 T 27 R 3 1 19 q DATE 4 4 W.O. N0. � ���'*' � � I , REASON FOR WORK PRO V 1 b F- 3t p E I U CA NN D 5VC E FOR ` �' H O 1'� 1 04 & � 5 AP ENGINEER Q L A G IK D 5 E �t L. DWG. NO. SpS� I DRAFTER •` U.G. N0. I zo/208 ' 3 1(01 K W K M SCALE � DATE WORK COMPLETED �%/ '+��� FOREMAN IWN I�1"1 ! APPROVED ENVIRONM�ITALANALYSIS 14N SUBSTATION MA PL E I...I'po D FEES REO'D M YES O NO a EXE B`i . O NOT EXEMPT p 18 ITEM C CIRCUIT NO 12- !) 4.3 PHASES PRIMARY OVERHEAD U.G. COND. _i 2 . �70 KV D RESIDENTIAL ADD 175 CKT. FT. 3 PH ROAD CROSSINGS ONLY A- O COMMERCIAL _ _.._ +.. REM CKT. FT. PH APPR DATE DWG. NO. 5 LEO # NET 175 CKT. FT. { SECONDARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV REVISIONS 4` " BASIC FEE $ ADD CKT. FT. PH APPR NO. DATE DESCRIPTION a. REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. METER/CONV. POLE $_ PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) PRIMARY UNDERGROUND a' D TREE TRIM I AS -BUILT r` APPR NO. I DATE 1' DESCRIPTION OP 1101`41 ACa. , BU I I.." I' J013 SITE-, 3 � 4-1�AY5 )4 O RESIDENTIAL i D STATE O COMMERCIAL'S BASIC.FEE $. D COUNTY IN CITY IDMONt^.. LEU #574,g� D SECONDARY UNDERGROUND EASEMENTS BASIC FEE 8i ❑ REQUIRED O NOT REQUIRED DATA aEN O - 1 /3zg4 / @$ /_$ E-•Z132lo9�� UNDERGROUND PLAT ;. 1 -24-94 j BASK FEE i �� DATE RELEASED FOREIGN CONTRACTS FT. @ $ / _ $ D GTNW JPN # STREET LIGHTING ❑ CAN JPN # ¢ @ $ / _ $ t ® JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CAN WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY O JOINT BORE GTNW &CAN. 0 PRIMARY `:- O O SECONDARY ?,. POLE STENCILING 175 FT.@ $ �,251 _ $ 21 �J18•75,4.. FROM TO MISCELLANEOUS FEES TAKE OFF POLE VAULT $ PRf-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS PERMIT $ 32f oR O TREE TRIM D PUD LOCATOR X. -RESTORE ASi'HALT $ 1,701,01% M BACkHOE O FLAGGING ' t oo A M P @ $ 9. 32. 1,t9 2.0 0 ONE CALL DATE $ # TOTAL DUE $ 7, 7�� , 75 INDEX POLES PLAT DATE PAID 4- —14q ' LOGS U-MAP RECEIPT # 2 t 74 XFMR CQ► CAAP (�IJI �I 4 NEW SVCE APPLICATION # 1 2 D 1 3 LOCATION MAP PAGE _ 4 FS AN'o 194 DATE PRINTED I 't ar i i TH SWvai' ams.. w •,: 'Z '•,.� 1 T T 311 v: IwR '¢ 1107H ow .13 ., t `19m IST, sv M�(t 1 wY yiY �'l 19 H5t SW tlElartul PIUGEi1 . J'� �//fRf HIVOt -,tR Y ILUJO Yf eRtaTETn �U I ASP " ST .. tl -; t ZOOM i s 8ftpt." Z It v , . u 2 11 tAtt)tALtT(R 'f R' ,� v "� > IfRRA� a II .•"•- �.� .:e' .➢ARX v, Lj ' <,tt a ke ♦ ✓i a� � t >n i ,As • Nftl /X �a ,rr V. � uw��♦ �^ n � � & r. r is MAIN « tw 20 A sw . K may, ST . u yTOH I 23 '" KIME ST 3N • N n tuft°,jj MI >. t1jv 1 rriST . i Y ruaiifa C i t i lR%.mLIL y• y • y .... Swmw twti IN y �/M t t S1flK r . si ..16 A." tl ZrN� > � ! M i g' _!Imp ST $ a. '�< = TM S1. o, 0 i i 9ILU �» x tlH St I ItM T a 31 ]/'IbOIA O D .r `, �` • : w Y pp i $1 r iNr+ tt g Ei 4 • L I ,a! tr slim i8 l7 s 3 s r +m a nsti, TAG 5. VA LTA- V ICIN I?Y MAP �Oawv W AI m / L -10 W6 CITY OF EDMONDS uSE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB 7 ` RUITE/A, /k OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS y's1 �� ii r w I GG ,.v.s C ovs r �� .v C... ON LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. ir w O MAILING ADDRESS /s-a :3 k� rf,_ souril -+ C E L -2 1/�}1 TESCP Approved ❑ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. ❑ CITY ZIP In 0 tj6j ail TELEPHONE NUMBER C - �/ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION RW Permit Required Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ ❑ _ PROPOSED Inspection Required Sidewalk Required ❑ NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YESX NO ❑ O ADDRESS 9 3 3 A REMARKS a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER >Vi4 f9/ J— NAME q T // 66140 ,t/S 1 N C- c[ ADDRESS r � O ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY pZIPIF (} TELEPHONE NUMl�BER Z'7t.dS W 7 A C�'I-C /6 FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY oo Z - 10- 1 J STATE LICENSE NUMBER /� rA (liIRATION DATE � V R � 9,6 14146 VARIANCE OR CU ADg.� SHORELINE It Legal Description of -Property - include .all easements �"I+C� Y SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT e zz Lp 7 5 I 4- 2- rs` COMPLETE I EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED EXP rn �j Z (J wtApj S. a LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS 017 ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR {{ Z 0 ZI J Propeft Tex Account/ `� oo a0 V U , O a ' ILOT AREA PLAyP�I FI BY S Q 4� g Parcel No. (Y S REMARKS NEW D RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING/MECH COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USEj j)/��/ REMODEL APT. BLDG. SIGNel � w m w'rry GRADING FENCE CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OD COCCUPANT OR REPAIR CYDS. L—x_FT) J/C DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA OCCUP offo INSERT HOT TUB/SPA REQUIRED AYES 9Lw7T+� LOAD 1.0 CARPORT ROCKERY GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ RENEWAL REMARKS o PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1'08 (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: Z rx W NUMBER,�� N MBER O CRITICAL Ut44,4 6 1 7 �Rr�,:�'i- #/�Z0 m O OF DWELLING / AREAS 1144 tn0 STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE IIApeePLAN CHECK FEE HEATSOURCE: (� GLAZINGf K BUILDING PLUMBING Plan Check'No. -ati . ?�� MECHANICALgyp► �� f'��t•�1/T This Permit covers work to be done.on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curls, sidewalks, �^ driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE N successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, m employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages ofcc whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 0 of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to 0modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance z nor Alma In any way the Clty's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE /{ il�� I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read this application; that"the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion InsuraU2= RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATUR INNER AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT ��n' Of CITY OF EDMONDS OFFICIALS SIGNATURE DATE ATTENTION CALL FOR INSPECTION2J_Z3 RELEAS DAT A/ IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ��� -0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK = Owner GOLD — Assessor 10247 r' the northernmost parking stall and planting some screening of pyracantha along the fence down to the depot. MR. SPANFELNER MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. KINDERFATHER, TO APPROVE ADB-133-79 AS SUMITTED. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA MR. SPANFELNER MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HINTZ, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. There was one item on the Consent Agenda: ADS-1-80 JABIL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Review of as -built landscaping plan for condominiums at 1070 5th Ave. S. (RMH) AGENDA AD D-ALAS!tT1 A'GA� Z E-'Review of site, landscaping, -and -elevations of- -1 a dition to aska Magazine building at 130 2nd Ave. S. (BC) l James St. will be completed with this proposal. Engineering is working with the applicant on the exact requirements. Mr. Bowman indicated that street landscaping shown was adequate but the end of James St. - should be planted with grass. Exterior lighting and the trash area were not indicated. The= DB-had approved-the-par-ki.ng l.ot=a.t-the December 5; T9.7.9-mee.t.i.ng.. The siding on the building was proposed to to white baked enamel. The siding of the existing building will be Dainted white to unify its appearance with that of the new building. 1,9t l;ayouty,. Vernon Behm, architect for the project, said the rooftop equipment will be contained in the mechanical equipment room in the penthouse. There will be an elevator. He said the landscaping on the balcony will be potted. Virginia Hill of 200 James St. asked how far back the addition would go from the ferry holding lanes. Chairman LaFon responded that it is a 63' addition to the existing building. Mr. Behm added that the height in back is two stories plus the line of the penthouse. Jack Farrell of 200 James St. asked how much traffic would be generated as he was concerned about parking. Chairman LaFon stated that parking spaces for the facility have been added in the proposal. Fred Elliot of 200 James St. asked what the height limitation is and he was told it is 35' from the mean elevation of the property. Mr. Hintz asked whether the sidewalk on James St. will be extended on the north side. Mr. Bowman said it was not required at this time and IL that area will be grassed and when future development takes place the sidewalk will be required. Mr. Kinderfather expressed concern about. the starkness of white metal siding. Mr. Behm responded that the first scheme was to use cedar siding but it was a matter of cost. Chairman LaFon felt the shapes and forms were nice but he also was concerned with the metal siding. Mr. Mattson also felt that if preliminary approval were given it should be pointed out strongly that the Board has reservations about the proposed siding. It was noted that the residents across the street will have to look at the building. The applicant was advised that a cut sheet and location of the exterior lighting must be submitted, as well as the trash-l.oca.ti.on_and screening. M$=HhNTZ_MOVED.—SECONDED-BY-MR�SRANFELNER TOJGaI'VE-PREL-_IJ INNARY�- AP_P.ROVA1 TO=AD6i2-80 SUBJECT-TO-SUBMI-T-T'AL-OF-L-iGHTING—ROOF-l:ANDSCAP.ING, AND TRASH ENCLOSURE. MR. MATTSON MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION, SECONDED BY MR. KINDERFATHER, THAT THE BOARD STRONGLY RECOMMENDS REVIEW OF THE SIDING TYPE AND COLOR; I.E., SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHITE ALUMINUM OR STUCCO IS DESIRABLE. THE MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED. THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED. ADB-136-79 FOTOMAT CORPORATION - Review of signs at 550 5th Ave. S. (BC) The amortization period ended on this existing sign August 5, 1979. The building is very small so the total allowable signage is 9 sq. ft. The existing signage was approximately 55 sq. ft., including roof mounted signs which are prohibited unless allowed by the ADB. Mr. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 2 - February 6, 1980 �� �aelc ;- . 'a /411*a/i• O; . O lSdi� xJ` �irry, C.e3 " C'..i G ui f �etdez rx cts-, s t Con b 6'� .. /cam . i ..<30 ' .'r G ias�` Ss4a( Wfrc�z!- 1 �~,-, dui W�,-b /� - ., .alk,; o�«y- ChC. it Ctr»�ei -ti rM« G�+w'T'91M,r 7`0 ,=)e T�i �! , / _ - ,,I tH o y ,/0 V R/ t ! i wh• 1. 4 f'.- h cxm/o I I I I � I . I I :I . � . I . I"I I, -� I I I� 1. ,. I L" "I I I, I O� ' , ,I� r, �I . I I, 11, I . 1 I I I , I V /II�I« 6 V «�« _ _ 1 II G, ': I � : � I . I I I . I I t- , ��- ,�: - I -:''� I ;l , ,� X, �II.�IIIII, IIII�I . I .I,I .II II , II�� I III�I- i I , ,II1.I.,III�II� ,I , I.I. I I ,, ,-I* . L- .., ,�II 1 I III �I ,II I I, II.� , I �I :I-�I.�1� �I.-� IIII I � II. I1I I - I1 I II .�,1� 1I I . .-�II, , �-IlI ,.,�I II�� I . ,. '- -I l II1II., . .. " ., -I- - I�IIIII III'II1.I,,II�I �I . I - III 1II �I I �-I, �II II�-. . I1�,I I I II1, .� . I IIII �-- � . .I II I�I� I. ..I I I. I I I . I � . I +0,� ... �1I-. �l..1.:1OI ......, ...�I �I. .. .I 1'..1 I,'1'I� :,-I r, I.11 -q1O-,.I I ., , "I-' ,, f j I I I,I.1,I,I , I1I ,�, ,., -I� ..I.;I1.,.I.I....�,� . 1 .I�-I1 I. :� I .lA L1�,..I�. II ..1I,-I �. ,1�- II...1 -1III I�..�.""11'.,.��.1I!� ,"11..:I .I1.,,-1,.1,I � p�I :. : 1-1.,, ..�.�...I:...1I ..'1.1..*. � I�....�I ��1...I....tII.. I ....� I .I1._..IL ,�.I I.....-....1 I ... I�..I,, 1 : �,. ..I�, 1., I II �...l,.'.II-..III ,1.II�WI . I :I" .I� 1., II �� t. -..1�.I.1 1i,4.I *.I:-1, -,'.1 ,,�-1, ,-...:. -II... ... �I,WI :�..,... I lI-4,..tII. -,�-....1...�. ...... , , ..I.I 'I ..,.I......I.: 1 ., ....,,1-.II -I .� , 1,,Il,,,I I -.'-, 7- �I ,,I1,., . 1�.., I I ' ,.-II.,--.I � ,.. ,� ,I. , . I II',..lI�-.,.I I.I , .I�- ,1I -"�� .I�II�11.III ,.I......I.1.� I.I....�.-'1I'q.,�..-t..�I I ,I........1.�.,� '..1. .:,�......'I � ..,.......I� ,-.I .-.... .I� ,, I ;I., 1 I.I , I .1 II , .I I-1.I I .I!7,��.. �I�.I , -1I�-.� .I. . 1.I-.-,1I."lIII.,I.,I,.� 1II A I.I,, I:I�.......* , .I1,.II.......1I""..* �I�........- ,L"II ,I.I.."1I :.II.- , " , ;I.�*... 1.", ......-.I; �. .-.I' .I� ,. I .1 II '.l1'.-1,1,,. ' , I ..�.I.�- ..!I ,l �I,.I�11" �-.,,.- ,I:."-"I'1III-.., I% I: -I�1.I , r , "-...I...:,�. ,,�...1..7.'-1I .�. ..� 1,.1..1,, ..1.7.I. . ,�, *...I .- ...-.,. I !1.,......�..1 1,, , I 1,1�.II -j� I I� �-.II .I1�-� �.�.i, �-, �11 , ��� " -� - ;.I.�- - I '-!I .lI " , " � ... II 1��%, �-, I �-..I.III11,.I:,:...: " ---..7.,,1I....I1.�I-t..-11.'�,. I,....,...1"'�, .....t.I I. 1.I '�I, .I�1I-,.� f, -, I,,�'.I.,I:.,-;-I1- , ,' ,.I lI ,, 1 . , . -'"�I I ,1�II ': .. I . - .� , ;.�I I:,' I".-� ,�.,i1 .I..!...,.�,�..-..I-l- .:t".I..�...I�',."1, .I�III II , , ,...'I;�I �.:- , ,I..I-..I..1..�, �,..�I.'.I: ,I1 . II� , .l .,1I��` ,. ,,, . , 1I �- ., 1-�, :I`!. ', I��.1I"l"I -1 I1,--,.�-''1 ,��,I-1 - .1'II�I '- ,, I.1�� ' II �...,. ,. . .....�"-,.....-1.....I- .....�..I ........ .I ; -.�11I ...-, : , I " ,I,,1-� ,I!0 1,,-I1,I,.-, :. �I, I I - ,I , . , I" I1I 31I� , 'I-� �:�:.:-.:;.,-.I..-:.::.:-.:::::.:.::.�:� :,:;.:;i!:: -� I�:;:;.:;�-.::.I-�::.:::-.::.::::;I-, ...::V:::. . :::I I-�,-i,I--,.�1,, , '.- .'; =1-.. ,I, � ,\�.I_� I �1.I :1- �I11�I I TI I-,.1I ,",,��1,I .1�.I.1'".�; I ,Ik.I.,...A . ... ,I ..... , I � I1...."..,..; I .�.--; . ,.-...... II, .,, .1�. --�'......7;.. .,I l ,- I . -% -�. I ,�.�.1,I II. I -..� �I ��- -,"-I,.I'-III ,.., I I,,,II. I -�I," ,.A.... II :'..-...... ,I....I.-...I�, 1.....-III -. ..1..� .'..., ...-.-..I1.- �_I..'�..,1-1. ..�-1 ., I..'1:1 1I,,.�..-Yi'I -.,�."I1I ,.-, I I�I III,1 3I.I' ,c�I ,�, 1- II -1�,...�.�,1'..-'t..I-:lI;.,.I:, I.-....I,,� �- ...... .,,'I . ... I �...1....... I� , ....�I !I,.I,I 1I .I -,.�I 1I, . r. I. . � 11�I" �I , .��II.1.- �-I.:,.I.,.' .I��-, ''I�I�.- I ,- � .II�,,, ,,,.I�I.... 1�,, �-....,. -'��I... I:.;-...� I'I ,..�, ....I,�I � .... I- ..'..,I',I ,1�'.-....1"� ,.� �.,:,' :I"I. m, 1 , 1lI ,.I I �m, , :1. �I.� � �� I � .........I� ..,�:,1.I4 i I 1 I.I",, ''.,,I�1�-,. I:!"�II11 �"I:iIIi.��,-�.-I-1, --I�� -...� � I 1� -.7z -1��1-, . '�-l�...-4.l-, l� ,,...I I�7Y'!.'... II -1..1.II,1-....I I � .I. I$1,�.., , �........I, .I ,.ICp 1 -, I"1- I �., ,,:.��:,;lIV. 0. �I1'lI q,,. ' � . I "-. 7.,II I : 7I,�, IiN ,"I- 1. 1 .I,.....�,rI- '.,t*-.I I-..1 -1 ,."I.*.� I.l.... 7. - ,,, .I - 'I �1"-�,� .�,,., :, - 1-"�..� --- , .AIII",I-P-.I..,EI- � .,...I,I I , -- .,I ��� ,�.* ,.�..... ..- I...... -... �.� .....�.'1 �-, -, -, , ,� 21� .�1- lI 1:.,-I,,:.,�,:'"-:, � lI � .I-,':::::::..., 1 ::�:,:I:;,:::. � :::::.:III� .:W:-L.::::!::�::.:.::::;:I:.'.I- .;.:.:�i::i; ;:::::.:::: .::::::::: I ..::::::::I"I , I II-q I -','-1..,.I �,::,tIII:�,l-.� l"� � *sI'�.I,1-.:.-I �.-,�.::"I,,L"I �,-........I...','-:,- ;I--�'..--,.I,...I� �...I...l,�l ,...-1 II r. I....� ....-C3, l,,�l -�,,�., Llj', , '.;s,�. :i - 1,.ll�, -I,C.I ,1..1.iI�t--,'I.$,I �� ',:...- .: i.I I �� i�. �A'II�I -.-' �I.I 1:.,.I I I.I L1�OLIl.II ,II1I,.-,,,,.� � 1ff,1'EI, ,l.���.I1III",I-I: 1I :::.:::-:�., tt";:..:;:,:.. �, :::::i:!::;:1.::!:� :::;::::::::,ft::::;::',,:.,.I ::::.:::..,:�:t. "'-q,7",1�, .:- ., - -�',, v�::�,I ,I,,1�,I .�..-.I",-. , I11 7, 7� T,.1 1.I��,IIL",1"1II,1�...I�I..",.1.... II.i...,. ,,..I.1�'I ,. 1...Y��I .1 .* 1, ...11 :',1.I ..�- 18�Il.1,1, ,,,,,�1I,I �`1.,',...'�,�:I �l-' -'1I l11,., I, ..l-1 I. I�s-t 1I �1,�.I,,.... .l,-. ,-...��..... c>rB':3 -a. I , .. .tI� -�S-,.., 1...: t..1...'U: ......lI .'..*I"'. .I- ....I �i� -.I ". I 'I IlIc*I E- I,'II4l7.,. I-...'"�... ..,.....I. ., .....-.. .S,,I-'--..I . Y -- I, -"i.'4,.1�fti.II .-'" .II �.�..- :. �4�I.A.1...II.,1 .,* ..�� ' .:. I .-I,l:".-. J :., II.,z.1',. iI, 1It, I -I - I O- w��.,7�.,I--o :� 1I," '�".I -"!1!.I I:i*::.:-:I-.:r:::: 1Iii:I. ,;-�,� I-I�1- lI �" I�!, II ,,L1l-1IItI1'I'� . -,-�",1�� .,!p, ,o';.� .�1 .%:I'�..I. ;.,,,IIe.�-.;,'II o,-�....-, l.",I �.I'' �- l. , I� Il, 07 , .�- .d..�.�,�,AI I.,�.. I II,. , I'l: ,"I.,'.'=.�-111I,I., � I�l" .", .1- , ,l......,. .I ..::- 4...., '--Il- 1 I .1I .���.', , ,I,..I .. -,I ,l f I ,7l . �'..I.Z,I��.C.�,1, II i.:�L.I�, d1I.,I wI....�, .� :I.�I.-...,..l ..�I...I�.�� I.I , . I , I �,I :- �.I"1l.1,", I1A i.,-.II.I"II'.I I 1,-....I.,"i.. .....7-I -I,.,..1:�t .., "- , .. 7 "� 1i,I .T.-I �II 6,. I ..,.�� i",,I, z.1I�--.I- , I , ,.�-,",I� . .":, .-..-�,, -.....!.I�1. �-v ..... i:'�1� ,I,II.-,,- , "z��1",.rr-��,l�1,I",f,:.��,�'".,'.,-,1-",t,I.-,,1'�.,:,-"" ,,vI','�l-��.',��,p�i,1I.':`"1'I-,,� , 1. ���1'�1�",�,, ,.)..I1 I.6II'.I �j�"-"..1.'I 1�OI,�I',,I7�,,. .' ���I �?;II . , ,, ' -l., I"'�� .. -II 4l I ,�"�"- �t II 1 ,. ..II ...*� .....7.1 I ,,1I 1 ....1. ;4II..I, � ...I � ..,... I��1 ... I,' . r _ t �, , I' 3I..��1-.��-.IIII.. � ... . ,I .* .,.'..�= � �" �"i ..l..,..I ....k I . V .lI,I-, -q .e' 1. z"` .r. ��� �" '", , � o , I n A �, �« p $ " #.,OeOt,h { f or t. 9640 (J � �Q r u fix; Oe A Alt. #1 ,4 '" " 4 i 'a PV111 �"A' � Enr Pr% C Pbc M t?t Lift ' '� `seG.2s zlf it r e JIf Y y1i (�i��(IV .,�y� // .EX/sT. ,�',©,ao5r� {,'w'i 1.r., - t„_onC/•L7st ryes; r ... - ,.t �I,,iI;',.I -i��� .. ..,...�.I'i'-I�: ..,,,l;1 II. ",'4�q� .I..,�,....--..r-,II% .I,,��.'.�����I !.1� 5." 11-,- �y,y.,"",-,.0,-"II.,.,,,I l,,, .', ��,"',,'ll1 I ,,j I .l!,,l --,,��A...�"..,,.'�'.-,�",,,-..lIl,�,le1�.� -..l,.. I,.....I . . I'- I. " ,1'"f1�I ,,�, .XI" �I1;.1,,I .I��/�, I 1-:�I".,I I "1�, ,., �.I,,);,��I-.I,�..: �..:,�7�, '� .�'-.,,1..:-*.I,,.*..iI,7"11. .. ,.."� "I �.�.1! "-v�_.,:, �,�l . I_ . �I,��I.;, :I�,�"1,4 .II , �"1I �-I ,,. II ,A.'�1� I I,I.'� -I,1 I *;.� .!.;�I.�I � .* ,� I,� .,._�II *-.'� "I .�,", m1,..., I�I .*. ,. . ..� , ...I c[' -/1�.1 1�,I- ,1�.'�,,:I,� ,-l 4 ...V,.........*..-......,...61.,.I .'.'-7I ./Il., ..I.......*.....;, .w . l. ecI..��.A�� I........,.......I,I . . . I .. -.,.. :: '... ..../ I I ,.I9..1.,= .1.'.P .i,.). ' Lira m r . G.7 � '� ` ,11 .. C. TCH 8AS/rt/ T0iG' -ca.o .S7WrX::W II 1.�.-..�,.r �.r--w�ek A*Oh :f tv rr cc.� �`i 5� : ` +`" �*r ' , ".- �..1�.,"�1I1.-1-'1...,I.1,'-�'1-I!, .7,Il11,I;::.:: ,,�"'�I ,�::::::�--,,, ,-- ,�.."-tI "�,1,1.,-..I1�, ,,�,",,0..., �'�."�,�*Y' ".,1,7:-��1,1,"`, .Q� �,,,1*.. - Y ` 7, -02 2/d/ --_. /O. y 4 7 IL / / / 90 I1. ',I1'.,� , . , .....eI-�� I' ,.I..t.1...�-I !�1I'� ..: ",, --.., , �. 01I �:II.1(I., 11I � 1, 1I :.::::, I1"I I --.. ,� ;::::Ir'1 ..:::." ;::. :I:�, r, �,1,.I . OI ,! i1I:.. .I��.1�� ... I .II ,, I...."�.... . ,ft.. ."1. i,- -.,1 . -�- �..l ., � ���'� I , � . '_;q�I, �I �.,� . � �:,l��-Ii--�;iO; I1 . .. ....I, -IIi-lI-.I:.,I,I .I .l* - ..Iu,llN-I"I ' ,�* , ..f IIl, l-4Il.I"Itt�- z .,I ,.I �I, ....-, .... 1 lI,-..�I ...1I ,.I....1I..--w.�- l .I 1. , ."-,/-II"-� I1I...� III;..I....- '.- .I1I.I"-.. � .I-I..II ....-I � I .. . I -O"11'� I'I ." -I .III.� wI�:I �q.l.I,', I.\III� I I .IlI11....I'I .:I ,' .�. 1.-I.� N .1l.I..�'...11�I, -.I �.. --- -.1�..11�.- .I:�...� . ,I..I� . . I I , �-'.. .� I I.1III .-, - ?�- ft�..I. ..:� '. -I l 1II,.:.... , Iv...A 1. II,.I - - 1 0- I II �1I �-.' ,� ":Iv .I 1; .I ,�:.I'l::::::::! . %:::1:;- �.: .� �I.- I.,::, : -::::::.:�5.I .�6,I1,I 7,. .I...".� ',-n'I , �..l,I�.'.1...I .;I-k1-I.��---I, 1 ... I .',1�,.-.I...I t�" ..�.1.9 ,1�we4I07%,I 111..q111-.I1I;�,t _. .I 1'z��I� ..� ..� , .,� -,; .�l-lqI,'j..-*.1-�I �.111.I ...: ,- �,.: I -- I -I �(I .I;I� ,, �i,, ,�.I.. ,.i,,..I 1,-I,,,II � ... I- .II ,,III... , 'I.1-.;I..., I1.� � ' ;II: 1I�. -.�, 1 ." 1'I _ I .: 1." ��Ii '', ,,1. l, '��'-o�1,�,.i-,,,� 1t.�C,"I �., �,"�,�� ,I �,,,"1, -- ,,"-,.j,It�;I .:�,1�-,i�1 '�_T4-, ..�,,,`�".,'--,,_'".:��".',, ,,,'.., , ,,I, �"`-,..,-.."..,,-,,��1� ..: `1;�"1.-.',',,,,"`,� ...,,, !�I",.-:!'-,1�V�� �",�."1,�,1I,"�., ,.;,:, " /�:,,- .'.--, ���,I.�c""�,I, �w,,,1�,, %��.�,,"/I �,''.,,-,�;I ".l1�,-:.i,,:�',.:,,�-; �...�1--.,;"'�,,",,� .�:-I,_...II,;.*...� �,I' --"�,.7..,,,-I"1� ..I��''.I�`"-,,.'� ��,,-,v�.`,`, ��"' �:;,. -:,, It,.....�,, � .I..*:,I.�,,��.I ,'�-�,"�" ....�, . -,,,I � .�,',' '�.I ',�,-'lI� 7 �����e -.�4l,,�t�I-/,� l?.,-:1I,, �-MII ..-i� "� .4,,1��'*1-,",,, ,'�", .,,,, I1 V-1., ,, ..-7��,�" .,",��L �T"1,I.� ,, , ��*.t.... �I .-...,N . y7!! « ¢ , , 3 / !• 3 I 17. 8 /t� Z- / - // �i;r . I. .i� *7f Y ":.!a*./JdI�«+T», - .^� %.7', % i` -- 7) lea II I. »,-, j � . b . 2 n spar 1L /'9.8 / / 9.8/ / r4410 A//rat,:. « , « dB i - G9 , ,l • /g. ©. . - /t�. © i O i,2© /. / E': �' A//ezy - ,3 R. e.A, 7,; " ".." ».�dtrpl''� a,/=lo"' 3 2/.G'%'f� 2l.S -- cor` i'5-4 6.LT. 1'sf�c:2a"cQ , #3r.cr verprfh - Thss (�: < :cr lowrisg ' ,9r)7I +mwrce afa/cs Zvi/h dr 'v a y i- e/ca ' ;, �. 4� rIf)� 1 ' a..8«e.rcti $esrs iLfctrk 7G G'ersct �Licrisvmcz .re ft/ *h 4- cz Vu ri: wii fh > k Cioorb , t#er4 .1'.�ftt.r.:% �1�i0/! 2.n420, -- ./6," ca s sS ,-- - Zr st, ?1 �-4 po,� 'A' 'w 0 41#4i�- sub- A, tt*4�k '; ,I` ►..sub- +� to E6 i i r.: t ' C►# . cam . _.. _.. _. _»._ -- _ __.. ; -_ .__ _ --- - --- �. teak". .R. - , - - �.: : :: , i _. - � . - ...I . ... ., . ::,:. I ..... .. : ... . I-- :: ... 1; 00 N.%0 ' .. ...........................I.............................................................,.................. .....I.................................................I.................................. .... .... . ... „ .. ... I ..... ........ ....... ........ ........ .... .... .... ........ ......... .. ..... ...... ........ ...... .... ..... :. :V ........ ....4. ........ ........ ..I..... ... ..`.v ......... ......... .I....... .... .. .. 5 .. . �1' L r.- .... ........................... ......I........................................................ ................, .....I.................................: .......... . :. - i, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i... . . . f .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . I.N-. , , a N { .-, i. . . V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . . . . , . . �1 l I . . . tr . . . . . . . � . .� , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ». . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i.' rl c. :::.r.. . .1.... ........ . ,, .. .. gip:...... ..................... ............................. ........l ... ...I.... ... ,.. ........I... . „ ;.: ... . . ... v ©. �; .. .........r� ...... ......... ......... .. ...... .. ... . . .. . T/ i. . . I.--;-,,.;�,�'.; �t Ott j � �.....j � t Ci ... .... :0 .,. L �" n.. Q _boo. ,.. ...." ....... Qt ' . W°�........ . L�.: 1p .1\ l� awl o: i 4� :� �.. :fit ,�..... W ...... . :: N �: fit.` A : of ... 0 Z.' ... ..........:........... ......-.. 5- . �'t.: ,.... a:...,.......H :�i i R N' .,.,.. . .... ... .... ..... . , ..4. ..�►. .... .4. ... 4 ... .. . :.. ., { y. ... ..,. 0: � . ��.... ..... . . ..,,.. , •" A �' C . t i .. ... .. . .. Q . . i .. .... ...... ..... .. .... , . .�.1.V . . }{ :. •1 - i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N. . . . . . . ... i. : i I . .1 //�/jI ,/+� ,/�, ... .�R:.. ................ ......... I.................... .............. ............. ............................... ....... .... ............ ......Rln ail!: .... ..✓N«l .... .. .. ..... ..., ....I..... . . . . . . . . . , ...I.. . , . . . . - .,.�I ' ', - \�' J - /' I • �'.. • ! . _ , 7 �; . i i .Ex s , l ; _a-. . «�:._r; .. ? - ; .... .sirs.... i. . . . f . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . i'.. . . . . . i i° i C7a' tL s . . . . . i. .. i. , .,i.,, ...i ....i .... r i / ... . ........ ..... ...... ...,.. ... ........,. ... .. .,I„ ... ...... .. .. ............. l......:... ..... ... ....................... .............................. .. ................I..... .... ' +v. , .. . t I :. _ ...... ... .... , l :: ...1.. .. .. ......... :: :. :. t' J i. ............. ,,.... , .. ............ .: .................... ...... .. .... ..... rc' td!! ....Q:....... ..... .. .. .... ...... ...... .. ...... ..... ......I.. ....... ...... . c»(>:- ":. .... .... .. .... ..... .. .a .ee� oc�s� a ......... . . ........ ....... ................ ... ........ » .......,.......:...................:.......;...; : :.:... ......... .. Q .. .... .... ......... :......... ... ` I : ; : ........ :: ; , . : . .:..,. t ...... : ......... :-.,.... I It: .......... : ......... : ......... : I , : ......... : .... .... : .................. ..: ..... -- ......... ;.1 ... ,..,.I . . I : i * , : I : :, � ; : : ; : : : ,:, , I : .: - . 1. ......... ......... : ...... I ... :.. I ...... : ......... : � . .''.,.. . I ... : : .......... : .......... : ....... ... ;- t ....... �;.. .. I ... : : ...... ,-:-* ........ : .... * -I. - -: ......... : : I . : I : . : I ; � I �l ; I �: I : ; : �. : L : - : . I : ; . . I I I : ...... I . . : b : .1 ...... . ......... t ..... 1. . : . .. . t . . I . : . . ., .". .... : . ....... : .......... : . - . . I - .... 1. ; . . I .... I . . : I ........ : ''. I I ....... '. : ...... : ....... � . : ......... : I - : : : : " . : : : : : : . : ......... : ... � ...... : ......... I I -- : I I I * ! I - 11 : 1*111-11, : : - �, . . I.,- I . ,.- . : : : I I : . . ...: -.- ... : !, ...... I : . ....... : ........ 1: ......... : :: � : : : : : :. . I :' ..................... 11 .......................................:..................:....................:.......................................:...... ..................... ..........,................. . .... ... .. ... ..... .. ... .eAl1. :. II Lj C. CN /V) W � 0 °o of 0 .0 `" Q 3 C Q N � O w C V ) O 60 O > N O ?_1 tf :61 D V) V11 - V 0 z , -Z (1) a) 0 - ' r" W W , i W k� 4 ` k V N l` \ `) `\ Y 4 A � �)",4 a .k I.� \ I % 15 - a W � ` h Q v p? v , .N 0h �0 © � % mf� *T , V' -, Q, Iq� .IG' r�%LiS Ij%�Y .c�".t/%/,%t G !W,..r�� H. SCALE / %n . ,G f e�"%. . r 1. ........G.f.......... ljI . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . S V SCALE r .. .... '�........ '� I Y try 4v+x i DE5 SHEET NO. .. .... .. .. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .{ DR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,'T. . . . :.:::..:: i : _ .yy . �GF1 �Igt�tTti�.`t'i1 . . . . ASS/j �Jh i°/t+..... 1�.8. 32 .. .. . lii1� ^�I� OP /. SHEETS . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . """+SN+'/ . 1. .-. i . . . I. . . . . . . . , DATE aI b/loJ/rf'GGd ....I................... :' FILE -. - - � NO. 102-16 ' 014 .,jam '�' �� F A w R%W i i A D+ FQ }[W�� V y Doi/. W �'! Q0 rn W a InNUPq J o 0ce o CL. °z z r s� 2nd AVENUE STA. 0+00 P 1 I i \ A lExist. Building •01 West East R/W 16 R/W 2' 12'-0" 2. 1 2'Tickened Edge S1.0.02: 1 t_ la ; m /C2Compt. Depth Class B'Asph. Conc. (, Loading Dock E1.2 I, 2i 1q0 ' 2 Compt. Depth Cc Surf. Top Course / 3 " Oompt. Depth Cr. Surf. Soae Course tai _ Compt. Class "B"Gravel Base Per A.PW.A. 4 _„i Ap 4g y ® Sec. 26-2.01, Base To Be Approved By City -�•��` , Engr. Prior To Placement Of Asphalt °0;"•.t�Sta, N+15 Lt.36' TYPICAL A L LE Y �VAY Const C.B. Tap 18.9A' Ala Itz A . Inv:-14.29 '. Proposed Finish Floor Il 0 qy E"x%sfiis_I ASPHALT .AEIev':19.2 Sta.l+50Rt;17.3 J 0to 3' Ie l� ��`"14, CONCRETE PARKING I Const. C.I. r A R E A Top 18.25 Const 95 L:F 24 "Galt' C.M.P.tnv: ;16.90 Storm Sevier at0.50% +4Cansf.fSL.R8•Si.Sew.atQ5t)t0/o.'�� I� Aa0. LEGEND; Ex. Mi No. 3 —- 4q yp. Ex. .IB Son.Sewer a ti ��,� . �ry �y 1y Bench Mork jb " — " ' " '" - Sto.,if62 Lt. I I . A a 20.0 proposed Contour __. _.. I'i � 1� ��� f Ex.C*S. TopConc.17.73 AdjustGroteto 18,16 .2 Inv.12 14.13, is Existing Elevation LL 30' &Ex•8"Storm Sewer at2.04% 30' , i3O,500/' Right of Way oil Proposed San.Sewer Manhole `L t�4� t> tib >00, 18, 18' ���'o �oQr� ; Proposed Catch Basin . Ex:12"St.Sewer aI 1.47 , A o kO'eei.Cx. O Exist. San. Manhole � e�101 "fQ?� A I To sti 7 14 Inv:E3.57SField Vorlf m O Exist. Catch ea sin p Y. a Q. ; 34 tgr �y� ®Consii28L.F.8' at sTA.2+o2 tgL •F• CutV• ro 7",C Exist. Sidewalk //!rlow .+'ss'///t'I' � Std. 2b a Const C.B:-w/OrificeaOilRestrictor'�„0 '® Ex 4 8 Top 17.00 • Gutter a N elE Note: Increase Elev. of Landscape Berm Std.4'x 5 Conc. Sidewalk � 2 Compt. Depth Class B Asph.Conc. '� Inv. 13 .81 p Top 17.02 y• Adjacent to OrificeC.B. W to prevent 2'Compt. Depth Cr.Surf. Top Course Inv. 13.25 w�` Sto 2+10 Lt. 36 ponding in Right of Way 3"Compt. Depth Cr. Surf. Base Course BENCH MARK = Top Ex. NH No.3 in Alley Way North of JAMES STREET LLGravel Sub -Base As Required By Enqr. Sub -Base To BeQ Sta.1+58 W. 1+44 N. Approved By City Enqr. prior To Placement Of Base Course SCALE 1 = 30 Elevation = 19.78 TYPICAL STREET SECTION __ _ DATUM = M.L.L.W. JAES _STREET Scalet _._ ....,,...... ....,..�....,...... .,..,..«.,,q..,..,.....,,..�., �V �r•V.�>. ,�..:...v .«..-.,.,., ,.� ...................�v r,...�......,,.......,,.,..,,,......�..,.,..,,........,.» f>. ,,..w,F.«•.,w. „�. ..«.....,.�«.,.,-,.,. .,.. .,�.. .,.......,e.. ..�,„...:,.....,.,..,......,,,...,... ......�...: .........,.o..«..,.o,.y.H ,.,...>e..,,,.w.,>�.w.,.e. .ms..,.��,.«..�... ,,.....a,.,...,,,.,,.,� ...,,........,,, _._..... .. ... ... .. .. ...... ....._,_ _,__.,.._. ,.... __.. ..... .. ...... .... ..... ... .... ... ....... .. ... ..... ... ... ..._.. _.... .. _,... ____._..,..... .. ... .....,. ... .. ... ... .... ........ .......... ... �. ......... ........... ..... :.... ,_ ,_ i ... .. ... ..... ...... ....__... i ............................a ... .. ....... ... .......... ............. .__.._..,..i ...___..._.. _. j.............. ...... ....... . .. .. ... .......... .__.. ._....-._,__ _._. _.. _. .. ... .. -.. i... ......_ j._.. ..... ...... ........ ....... ... .__... f.... ._ ,.. ..... f ..... .... .... i 1. _._._..._. ..... __. __ _ ... ......................................... .. ... ..w S ..... y.. ..t .. .. ... p .... _... ... _.._. q. .. ..... .. .. .. �.._. ... ......E...... .. .. ............. .._... I�1 3 2 ...?.. ....y. ... ... .. ..... .. .... .. .. ....._... ... .. .._ ._ ,.. _. .. ... f_. , .... ...... ........... .. . ... .. ..... .. ...... ... ._ .. ............ ..... ... .. ................. ... __. __ ........%.. ......_., ........ .. ...... ..................................... ... . _.._.....,. .. __..... .. _... ,.... ................. ........... ....... .. ... .. .. ..... .. ... .. ...... ... .. k ` .. .. .. ................. ......... ......... d ..... .. L ... _.. ....... ........_ ............ ............. .............. ......... . _........ ._ ... :j. ....� #. .. .. s .,.. E. ... t. f v L _ > w. �._ .. 4? �i' ��.. .............. ........... .i # g .........................(.................{,j ....... _. _, __._�' ........ , ... _ .. ........ i...._ .._.._.. _ _ . i ........... t ni 1L r. t... g.... �.. 1 _,._. _.. _ ........ 511............... ........... .. ....... n.. ........ ......... .. ... ...a. ... ......................... .. .-.. ,._._ .____. ...... ... .. .. 4.. ... .. ... ... .. ..... ... .... ..... ,. __ -.. _ .__. .., .. .. ............... ............................. .. ...... ..... i .�r L I ....... ....... .. ....... ..... ..... W ...... .3.. ..... ........ ... ....... •. _. « �_„ ,._ ,..... ......... ....... ..Cj,. .. ... .......y .... ... ..... . ... .. _.. ... _ . , .. ....... ........ ..... ...... ..... ... .... .... ...}..... .. ..... ..__ _.... ._.... 3..., _... ........ ...... .......... .. _ .. r .� V .q; .._ .............................. .. ... ... .... .. .. .. ........ .._...._._� .. _,- ............ ...... ...�........... ... ... ........ .. _ ..., .. .. _... _,._,,. , �. . _ .......... .. ....................................... .... .. .. _ .. .. .... . ........ .. ....... .....a ............... .... ....._.... ..__. a: ......1 . I...... f z s z i < Fit— ............... £ .. .. .'7 I .", .3. .. .... ... ... ...... .. ... £............ ... .. ... ... Extst...._P. r. J ... _._.:_ _......_, . _... . _ .._.J. o /�el......, �n s af1l e p 0sx. T�aB �d�u� fLX�SY!/J Crb.¢ra7 _ /Actc t%%% .................. 1. 9 _ s 6 ( 3 3 F i ...,,.r....�,.,v.......,....,....,.M,.....,,.,M,.....:.n�.,,......,.,,,.....,r.,z: ..x.,,,:....�:. ., .:,,,...,.....n.ny.: w»>w._. ... ri �,rm._.,.>�.;..:,,,.., ,. / 5 �.. , � .._ ->.... C�� � .... .... ...... .�......., �._�..`.... ....W.....................�S Rr1d..,�'e a�Ol�'1!.f.%/�tGT✓tCse. ..4. .dcl4� �.t�4f`.tcs:`i..7... ..... ._ ... _. rzo................. .. ... .................. r .............. _... _.._.... _.'__ .... _ _._ LZ . _ ! i7:o __... _ _ ..... :: ,....................� _ 2a .... ......................................o.......................... �.. .. ..... . ... t i € .. E. j 3• E� - i x i j] f 4 ... _, ..........._..... .. ..... ..... ..... .... .... ........... ... .. ..... .. ... __.,,.._., .. . ..... ........ ..... ............. ....[ ..... ... ,-....., ... _..... ... ........ .._......... ..... .. ................................. .. • y i . x a k a i.. _. _,.may _ ...�.. j.. �..�• :!. .. � .�.... .,�... �... � ?, .... __f. _. _..._. q.... ..� ...........�............ .... .;. � .. - . ._. ................ .. .... .. .... .. .. ......, ._ ...... .. ... i. .. .. - -_.._ E....._ .... a ...... _. ... ,.s _. _._.. .... s ..... .. . ................................................ n................. ...... .. _._. ._ U &........... ............. __.___ .....,... ...... ................. t......... ..# ..__ .. :................. .... g / _._�1.... i ............................:............. � 1 Revised Storm Sewer 11 May 1981 By A.R. M. A ® Revised Notes Per City 30 March 1981 By MRO Revised Storm Sewer 18Moy 1978 By .A.R.M. Revised - Parkina-.Lot-40,Aoril 14-78 By A.R--M: ED ONDS WASH IIGTOIN DEVELOPMENT PLAN! FOR y f Revised Storm Sewer 11 May 1981 By A.R. M. A ® Revised Notes Per City 30 March 1981 By MRO Revised Storm Sewer 18Moy 1978 By .A.R.M. Revised - Parkina-.Lot-40,Aoril 14-78 By A.R--M: ED ONDS WASH IIGTOIN DEVELOPMENT PLAN! FOR y f � c��oQeac+�ed.7irc, ENGINEERS .. SURVEYORS • PLANNERS. 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington'98020 rSEg.a.a:M. nATE22Feb78 FILE NO. 7020 SHEET' I -OF - I i n' t{ °R'A.R H. F. L.L._ CH. J. H.R., SCALsAS Shown W A R%W t t A 64 rn H O pppU �WW%. �acnra J o O Lz O O 0— z z M, I STA. 0+00 U� W 1 2 n d AVENUE West East R/W 16 R/W 2'� 2' . t w A j 2'Tickened Exist. Building p I Edge ; _51.0.02� 4 ti yq b1 • gq , is : u 2' Compt. Depth Class "B"Asph. Conc. t.oadi ng Dock E1.2 1. 2i ►4� 2 "Compt. Depth-Cr. Surf. Top Course I . / 3 Compt. Depth Cr. Surf. Base Course Compf. Class "B"Gravel Base Per A.P. W.A. a ® Sec. 26-2Ot, Base To Be Approved By City SI 2As Engr. Prior To Placement Of Asphalt , ►�, ,�� ,�t� �-- TYPICAL ALLEYWAY I � • . � r Sta l+ 1 t �. L;.36 - Coast 'S E V T 10 t� n� c3¢a satr+sr�;7p rvctvi,`Y`fr % 1. 6 Ftr�piosod �m►sW Floor A S P H A L T Ela .19,2 . Stp.l+SQ Rt.iZ5`' p! ►� 4f� t" t - ►� , CONCRETE'; PAR K I NG Const:`C.1: , Top t8:25 ARE A- Consi 95 L. '- -4,"Gain CM �' tnv. I6.90 �. Storm,, Sewer at,0.50 4,Cansst.•I6L.F.4*8t, iew.OtO50%- AO Ex. Mt No. 3� y►o ExaB` San,Sewer e. oh, ' � ►� ►y �r, , _ Sta,1462 Lt. I 1 n 20.0 Bench Mork .... ,. :_. . _. - c r e on Ex. CB. TopConc:, � AdustGroteto18.16, Proposed Contour 1'y. 3 " ®Ez.B"Storm ►Sewer at 2.04% Inv. 12"`�14.13 !S'� Existing Elevation 1 0 5t}°I R' IS' 6'� tght of Way ♦• 'rd r�' i 4}. ' Proposed San.Sewer Manhole ►"` l• l� o �0�`�6 o Proposed Catch Basin Ex.12 St Sewer at 1.47 jo 4 NX C,- a c,� $tC8 ? , O Exist. Son. Manhole o e�' C�-1tA ` Const. C B oter E:1Z S#.Sewer lx`oGo°�c,� �y 4� �+>' -Trip'°it 14'1`rty 1S `37 Ete,1d Vorify'=AO Exist. Catch Basin 4a �. t 6 i� r 0 0 $1 &Consi 2" L.E B"ot sTA.e+oz1i�x, at t t `s` % a i /rr'a/i ��'` ► Exist. Sidewalk w ,/� Std. 24EI .Conc. Cu b 8t t -vr Canst C 8" 'w/Orifice a Oil Restrictor L 2"Cam t Gutter a ® Ex•C•B• N Top 17 00' A* Note: increase Elev. of Landscape Berm Std.4 x 5'Conc. Sidewalk ® p . Depth Class 'B'Asph.Conc. TOP 17.02 Inv. 13.81 p 2"Comet. Depth Cr. Surf. Top Course Inv. 13.25 k Sta 2+10 Lt. 36, Adjacent to OrificeC.B.M•1 to prevent ponding in Right of Way E 3"Comet. Depth Cr. Surf. Base Course BENCH MARK = Top Ex. M4 No.3 in Ailey Way North of JAMES STREET Gravel Sub -Base As Required By Enqr. Sub -Base To Be& Sta. 1+58 W. 1+44 N. Approved By City Enqr. prior To Placement Of Base Course SCALE 1 = 30 Elevation = 19.78 all TYPICAL STREET SECTION .. owpl- DATUM, M.L.L.W. -- ----- JAES_STREET _- ............ __ .................. . . .....................F.... ....... :. _.. i ... ............_ ...... n.............................. ..........;. r...... ...lz.. # .._,...._.._-.. � ................. .�....; _- 1 .. p........... ................ 3 ... .. ................... .. S ; ._ .._ .. ...... .......... .... 2... 1 .. .. .. .................. } ......... ...................i ............... ..... .. £ l . 1 .. ... y... ... .i........................;.. ................. ....... ...: .......... ... .. ........... ... gg ...... ....... .. .. ... ....... r......... .................................;................................ ..... ._.._..... ........ 1............................. .............................y........................._• i ..............._................ -................. y........................... .................. d.................._ ...... ................_..... .................,..,...._ ......._..._... .. .._............._ .... ..__.,.......... _ .._.._._._.................._.........................................i.................... ........$. .................... .................... ... .............. _..... ..._......., .,__ ._......_.. .._.. , .... _ _. _. _ _. __. _........... ....... .............. } Revised Storm Sewer 11 May 1981 By A.R. M.e ® Revised Notes Per City 30 March 1981 By MRO Revised Storm Sower IS May 1978 By A.R.M. Roviffied Parkina-Lot--2aAnril.19-78. Rv: ED OHDS W'ASHIHGTO DEVELOPMENIT PLAID FOR f . f 1 _, �'�d t'E',0 161 'ENGINEERS, • " SURVEYORS .' �PLANNER5'� "-DR.A:R.M, 324 Cwlein Street". • " Edmonds, Washington^ 4'80' '= DES ' . A.R.M. DATE 22 Feb 78 FILE NO. 70 G.�� A : stteET ` i .' oR 1::.; :I � � C!�•�J, , fi: 4CALEAs Shovrn 2 nd AVENUE W sra. o+ao`\ ti a I' Exist. Building Ci. — �.. Loading Dock El. 21.2f tq Ao tfl: till >'" Cans# C.B. Top 18.9 Pro posetirFinish Floor PROPOSED ASPHALT F?fev:..I9.2., ��'� 30� �1 30 . �Ib...r„�g , CONCRETE PARKING ARE A Const. 95L.E 24"baIV C.M:P �..:, Storm Sewer, at 0 50%. L:.� r. LEGEND; Ex. Mi No. 3q Bench Mork%N ' , y o� - tv! �u. I.A0 �� i� 'o I'' :`42) C 20.0 Proposed Contour W 0.50°/r N !S/' ••— Existing Elevation Right A b 30 30 irk,iz ;,,,,_Si ��'©�: -oi Way Proposed San. Sewer Manhole 18.EG®02 a,. Proposed Catch' Basin �d � � g n,3tG�` 1 or��1�!L .• �k G O Exist. San. Manhole' o R/W R W tTt f tq�A �e O Exist. Catch Basin Z Const 2 L. F It` at STA. 2+a2 0-. 50% �. l " 77,ins /�� ,. Const.22L.FA v of St.S. Oi 4.�J6 i9 ,1�1' �/'.'p l y` 1rye 1 �(�jpfl��, /td. S.td.Conc. Cu b a � Const.C.B. w/Orifice 8� Oil Restrictor C �, ���Conc. Ex. , Top l7.00 Sidewalk 2"Compt. Depth Class "B"As h Conc. Gutter P Top 17.02 Inv. 13.81 2"Compt.Depth Cr.Surf. Top Course Inv. 13.32 Sta 2+10 Lt. 36, 3"Comps. Depth. Cr. Surf. Base Course BENCH MARK = Top Ex. Mi No.3 in Alley Way North of JAMES STREET, Grovel Base as Required by Engineer 1 =.30 Sta. I+SSW. 1+.44 N., '�* SCALE. Elevation : 19.78 +'�`p /'� b /^► STREET TYPICAL �7 1 REE 1 SECTION .. DATUM! M.L'.L.W. STREET j Scale: M _ .. - . ...... ........ _ .............. _ ......... ........................................:... _ ___ _ _ ... _. .. %. i .. _,.. s ............... ..................... ........ ... ..... F. .............. ._... £ - ,. _. _. .. .. ......_.. .......... ...................................... ........ .... .. �.. ._.._ _ _ _ _ . ;.... s ........................... a .. ,.. _. ....... .... .. .. .. .. -.. :_ .,_. r ...... .. .. ... ... �. .... .. ... ..._ ......._ ... .._F .. ...... .... ._..,.._ _ ..... ..... .... ... .................. ..... q . $.... .. .E... .._ _ _.._.... _ .._.-. _.. .. §...... ... ..................... ....... ..... .............. ...1. .........1 s d,..._ _._ .. 4 S - ._... .. ..... ' . ... ... ... d :. gg... ..... ... ..... ... ... .... .... ... ..' .. .. .._ .. _. ` F .. .. S q € 5 r^ 'ff L a . , ........................... ..... ............... .... ..........................o........... ...... ...... ... .. .. ._ ,...._. ., .. .,.. .._.._.._v _. .... ... ... .... ....... .. .. . ..._ ...,,.. .._., ..........,...,.., .. , .,... .. ... a .. . [. .. ........ .. .. ._....... ...__._,. _ .... .. .. .. _ .. .... ,.. _.. _... ........... ....... .. .. a .. .. .. ..... .. .... % .. ... .. .. ... 3 ...... _..... 3 i _. j, ._ ._ _•_. _ _......___ _ ... _._... ........ 3 ............ .. . , .. ...... .......... .............. ..... ... '• iit ) i .... ... .. .. ..... .. ........ .. � t ................................................$ .... ... .. ... _... ,., _.__..,....-.. ,,.V _. ... _....... .. ....... .. ... .. e +� _: ............................................... .... ... _N .... _... ._. _ _ ....._, ! ; l �.w,.��... a�..... p i .. .... -... _._.._. .. .. .,__... t ........ .. .... .. ... _......, , . .......... ...._...._ .. i f >.w.....w.. H ..,��.,.......�.:,. L......... . ....................... <................... i _ .. .. ..... .................... ..._. .; .._,...... �. t ... 1..� .. .. ...-. .. ....._ _.._ . ...._,...,. ....._.... ..................... ......... .. ££ ... ...... f"' ..... ... z.. ......... .. .. ...... ...._. ... a _ ...._.. i _..__ ..... 77 ... .. ......... - 3 ..{.. ...£. .a - - - ............... € ...... gg 8 ............. . .......... ...... ... ... .. ..r .. ...... .. '9+ W d 1 '�' . x ............. ...... ......... ... .... ......... .. �. ,,............ .i_., .... .... _.. ... .. ... .... .. i ! F ........ ... ........ ........ 3 .. ....,.. _..._..._..... ...,_ ._..._ .... ... ... jj ........ ... ..... a ........ .... .. _ b § 3,._ E... ^ P � '� Q _, ... � i. i � � ! V) W j .� y„.. .... �..... .. � .... ....y_.. S .. � .. .. i . j... ,...y ...... ...A..,... ..._.3.... i gg ..,y,.... 4 ._,_ .... .............. .................... . yr II^^ .................�............... ........ .... ., ..,,... ...... Yf ...... ,_., ,_ _... ....... ... .. ....... 1 .. .. .. .. .. ..... .... .. ........... ._.... ._..,..._i..__. .. ..,, ..... ..... ..... ... ... _ ....... .. ....... ............ .. ... ....F.... ., _,... ,,. .... .-. ........ .. ... a .. ? Exrst: @ Prnf i(le i � ... w .... .. .. ... ..... r ... ... S f_. _. .. .3 ,. .............. �.......................... c E...._r...`....... .... �............ ... Revised Pnrkinn Int 20Anril 197A Rv A.R M EDMONDS, ASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR - ALASALASKA MAGAZINE Rea, � �t��&>�� ,, �%pe, ENGINEERS • ' SURVEYORS a PLANNERS 324 Main Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 DESA.R. DATE 22Feb T$ FILENCl. 70 2 O SHEET I OF I DR. A.R. M. A.R.F.B. L. L . GH• J. H. R. - scaLEAs Shown / `Y t _ /�� - �I, P t " & o-,� %..II-. �--, .. - - ---,. 1---.�- '�, I, - ,� ..�-,-III ,,\ I .�,I:', "�, ,, . � .Z,���� � �,. I -. ,- .I-',. �/ -?— \— III I II�"- II,Il�`N � ,�1-.Ir.I � .�I- I\ I. �. . ;-�..� ,.. .I 1.I.I. II. ,\.I *,. I . .- I I.. >I \, I I�.�1 . ..I1I I . I1I . -. �� . ., �`I. ;� 1��.�.:'l..z-.,,.z,.III -I.>�. , '... vrI . �l>I�.1IIl.I1 1-". I..�, A4I .- I�1.Ie%* .- ���,1 .I- I . -.`. .�� �,,. 1. �1� ..I. :. " I� �. 1I � . .7. .... v:,,I �I - II,-. �I . I . I � .1II. ��I. -...�I,,�'e � .. I.1I, 1 .I.� �\- : 1..i( '. 1I.,I1II I,I V- .> . .,i�-., I -�:, .. 1 ;,I-'IA.,..I-I,.-) I , ./ Z. . .��' . . �I D . . , I. �-�I ,. �Q�I.I,�.II I - I �. II,�C..II. �" ' I >. ��.. .- .I I-.�I , ,I.1-.I .. II . ,,.11��. \I 1 �'II I D�I� I. . I� I.. I , 2.�. . I I�I . �/I t�.II\. I. .\r..I,. §. .)'. ".< I IIQ"�-,.1.I..- �. .,�. i,.� .,. . � .I. �IIjlt I��,.v..I . 14zI.. . z.�Z-.� � .-..I., C, .�. �II- �I . -It-15�lI,I�I-, - .� . /. . I.� , � �II..I-I-. 1,�IQ�-I.I ,- . . 17.J..1. .�l,.�.I.. "II � I -..�1I ... �� 1- .-.I,.�. I� 1,..t. 1 . . :. . . .lII I I .17. .I4..I, ,,Q.4...I, I .. v II -.. 1I, ... .. �,I ,I �I� I `l..� � I. �,I � .I � � ..I. I �..1Iz.'','�I-,c.0I. , ,I.��-.I ,.. ;.I-, .I.'(.�,-".,Ix . :I��, 3>. '�.�.I1/. --� I I/--...1.. ''ZI� ,I..I.%:�I11 :,I-�I-.�I� .---.I / ,7. --.-. �.. -�. > . � II.-.�,,;.-. -I_ -, I�.- .I, ..,, .(' I I, , :S. ).,I�,�.. 1. . I .: � -,: ..�- . , . .�I ,-,�I� .�"I ,I �; (� I I�, ,..- . -I.I . .. I .I ,I �I I. .. ��. !. 7-�-- I I.� �,�I I ..I-�I � . - ,,-I. 1� . 1II 1;.II.� ,I �- I .,. II� I � ..s1,I .II; . 1 .. \, .II I '16 �. II-/ .I,��. . I .. 1 � �l, I .. I I I. I . I- — -�.� ,,,.t-. I, I I. :, - ..�-,.1- :.':,-�.,,, � -..- -� �a..-i��f.I .'.% � , I ,I, :-... .'. . . . 'I. �, �:. I I --t"�I...I . .- . ,:,I.�,-II,.II III ,.,.� -11. �II .II . � .. .;- ,:, .. � .. :� � . I, . . . -.I,; , �� 1..'".I - I I I�I < - ..l:-.I 1 �I S. . I�I� I .�..1. .1I-. I 1.�:., 1..I I."15:I 1..�Il.d,... �-. I. . ' , fj `. , -t J,� ,,,. .. Ste/ V/ \ , IlI -.,II�� II --,.,IlIII , . 1, ,I ..,� 1,<1`, . -����..-1I� �..��, -.",— �I-I " I- . .,I:fI :, ,. ,'.-I��:"'—, -,� k, ,,I,, .,, - 'I,,,.-l-"�,II--, 1�I� 11�J.-"I. 1,.-,"., ,�� . ,-I. 11.1,V�1 I I--.1-? tI,, �l.I1� .. -�,-. �� 1,I ,I'� ', ��,II,�.-"" ,.1,1�I —I ..-,-, _-,It--I .�1,, 1,,11� ,, ,,f:.,"l" . I �� .I�, --� �-�., '.;.11 .. ""_1 -. .,1`� I,--"1 ","-� II �-I �-01 ", I -(z%-7. -.,.;,I� ';�1� ��-� :,-,,, :. , �!��l . -�-1..?I I' . I�I -�s -: I , 1f, I,'.� 1- ..-I1,',, 1,II,�.,-�.:-- , ,,I I, '-,�.-I ,.� ��. -.-. ,�-�_ ,,� :� C. ��,,,'-. ",�.I,-I�i�ll �-,,11�_-, ��,'�,-1".I,I1�y 1-I ,,:\%--�I ,"'--�"� �',i ,I.N .�"-�. -��.I,� ;,'I�-'� I �-_,-I ,�l 1� I ,I ,II .-N..-�1'-�.,�l���,-.1,��:z-,.',',.". ; 1, �7i I,.�,lq�I. , , �-\.. ; ��� 1, ��:' .-�.,, ,.� -,I -� �"�-St- \ :,-D� .,�-, ,,., � . � I C. �-, , - 1,�". �" :, , . 1:t/I ,-II -�-� \ 1 I1,I-I � ,--.,,--_ -:-.-,,-1I-1-.....�'.-I\ .1--I�-1.. I, . --�, II�I�\ 7 , . . ... II, -I . I. -V , `. - . . I- I . -- (\,I I —.I., . I ��, I I. ,,,)\ I -I - I- �. .� 1N;I1 :� . b f", ,' 4 /y -4-.> ♦ •• / f? -�� :1�/ �,y . III r , '`. `\ Y 1.74 �+ f l _ 1 Ea .., { rc� \ _ . . , ,> . �� , .+ : : . , . . - ��0- .i ..,``� . - ��, . 1 l��I 'pI I .I ,�IlIl:.�, � II.'' .��-II.� I- ., , \II.I, .IN ".I I �,.;I�. -.-. ,I ,I" . ?. , �—�.I, ; ,' I . ,,,,_ - +" I .\�I�1.— � .� I., II II ,- II II Ii .�.' \ ` `� . >.I,�� .-, o, I.I.,I I .;..,I:� .� I. ,f�..I,. ' I .. . 1I!.I11 ,"I";,III 1!II , I1� A�- -II �I ';: � ,--,,\.\ ... . .I, �1lA.- I,.' - , , 1 .1I ,. \ .1.. II,.� .1 ,,I .�. >�� 'III. ,�I . -1I I"�-.!. . \-.I ,.I�� . /,. I.�1 .. 1 ... �I .. I.-/.� � .1, . � I1. N ���,I.,:..1..,. '..1.�� � � . .-.- � �..I .1,I5-,I: 11 ,.,�;I I 1- 1�, ..,, � - .1�,\ �- I .-,,S- \'� \ N I} s !fy ``\ 1'" ( _,rya .'Q.r. .. L' ') - I `Zr�`{a'� .ram" . o \ I �I h. 1 .;:�9 y �, L .., \ �,/'� ' _��� . �, - . , I .. f .+�' ` \ 1 `? . \ ., -- cc" t ' f \ •\ \' f9 I. ... ! I� iIIi� � I �I'I .., I I -.I.'"..I . .I"�I � I ,. :. .I- �II. .�I -'.,1i!I ��i . . I � - ..I,t�, I�.I� .' I �. II I.I ..; �. I1 � . II 1L;l. I..I. I. I .�I I I\.I� .. - , �III . ,lI I '1. .. ... I ..,.., II\.I . I , . 1. :;I I ,�. I J..I 1III .I , tI . .I.��.�1 I rC.,. .'I . . I� I. .. :lI..- . . !. ;:-. \. . ,. .--..,. . I -I .. � ,,,z- 1.T,I.*-1� �....II 4�I '1-II .: '..� �I.I I ....� '� .,I .I-1����.. ,II ,, I �. :,I..-, .-:�I . . Q,I .;r.� -..-,N II� I .I .�� I .I I �'. 1.- ���. , > ,. III �I-. .I 1I.'.II � / I �.`..-.I1.�..I- —. . .". . ..::. �,I . * \,. . 1..II. . �- t "'�. \ N —\. j ? (/ r + . 1 ,ems! ! r " oq ' �, �'l- � c, . �'I\ \. I3I,"'� :I, , . -v,I I,D ,�. I..:,"1 . ;^ % ..1,I . e.�-I.,--. ICf.-.�� -.; \. I ---!� �-..1� II ��I ..-�- II 1...r.I .,-1, 1 ,-,� �XI' I, II. I- � .>l . i i;I I(I*I ,-I X . ..�I .D .\- �, \, I -, A.I � .I.I I I\ .. N, 1—IN .\ -, I. JS, .�.X . Y . .\I.I . :,: ,- ZC ,�'I - . ., 1. -. I N.1)I I , l;I,-.� �I,—� �1oD ; V.� s, " ' . ,- ,\-- , ,- 'I 1.,� �--,.\�,I I .-_I�.I`4-iI\Ir- ,. ,.., . I�I. - -, I -' \,. �. .I--- 1. -I 1..�.I �, l.-. . .I -. -, ,-n ,".,,-..,.,.-.,1"�, . . I � :I ,I -I1� 1I-I -_,I �.. . ,.. :-� � I - - I . . - I ...,— I I — �.�, .- ., -I . . , - . ... ., . � ...-� ... . —� I - ...� . . _._ -I ,, -,�- - I, , ",,, - .-, I -�-1I1 ,.-�'.- I I .I � I a-��..:; �. I.:-.� �,-�.I �, . �--I-l 1 --, .� 1:-,,1 .�. '1-,.I.�I t.'---.1I ,.. I I"i,,-,l.:1,.- , --, ;� , "I , ,1-��.I� �,.� I-11 ,..-:.1�.1. .1,-� , I*,.�"�I -"1,'"�1'.-i.".,l,I� -.. " -. �.I- I� .1 - -� -�.I ".1-17�.,� 11.1�. -,, .,� ,, �. ��� ,-.-,,1,�,�� 1I!-��1-�,—,:`W",,,, :t�,,, -.�,- ,':, ,��--. ;,,_-7,, - `1, !, --� 1,-1:�,,-�-- �,,:,",��:, ,�,-, -��,�-. ;'.�-.��:- �!,�',4*,,,,,�, 1;I �" - -� " .� I . -,��I-�,-,,,1:�I-I�4':�,,1..�-I1�-1 ,, ,�-'-,,'�,,',�-, ��,�,-�-�.��,..--,,,<-'--1.I,."+4�,%:`1-7'1�,111,;,1,�,� ,-,� .;".�1-,, ,I�'.I , I I��� I 1', -".-15 "�N..,,, ""I � �,I Aj I I -�I ��-.!�,-1," � ,".-,� -,- ,�. ,, - �l, I:I �,: 14, ��,- 1- I .,, , , , . ,,� I �-, , .I i 1- I ,�- "' '�,. :", 'v��1I'Ii ,:�� ,�", ,� : ,�. - .�I i t-',�, 1-1-�,1I.;,1I .,I� . ` `µ tore •rrx" ., l `�'` �„ .%. ,„. IV •:T - I . .. G_Y r'v'�1 \R . ,--;, ' ++ {� ,L - �� Y ,\' '.+� .a`" ""- «tr.,.y.,,,; 7---a—�_ ..- '^.-.,,..H'�1 \\11 � . I* . , ii . , ' 'S a w. y, w.,. 'e`.+.. . +a..ti, 't.. (M� . �-. .. . �' , ^- . +,: • ?sue ' + -.:.. ti :. N- Q � 1� "`1.I ;I. - - /�: "'w `7 '^n 1 .` :�'. �? ," -"' ^`,,,,,� :., - of " \�'. � , ," ,� �� I ; ,J J,,v^,/. rrt ','sir "'++. �y ..... a,� ,� J..,.. -?— --. --- •' 1\ . . •E . ti -- « .ti Iti . . . did `".`:`4 ,,,, - .,.,.. r't„, -,-- -' ! i ....,,�,.., . . ,.I,-���,1ll-J-.,I I1�I,-��I- ,�'�—.I - -I�,�I I.*l.�. .�, � ,- -VI,":�..��.,,..I��?7�I1� .;: I,--'-�. !,I .,,I,-- .-Z,I� ".-�, ,-,. , I-� �I-, . ,I I, . I ,.,,. ..I��v4. .4,a`I,- , "l.-.. I.�--V 1i,-"7m-I-I1 -, �� . �-:-� '" -" ),-,I,", 1�, . , 1 '. • - -.�\ . 1 `L -\ s �_ =- ^ , ..n "..; • _ � .. �'"�+ 'l , I� h �' \1 1 .I • 7 1 . • ",�- -. s. .,'•., ' #�.. i. w., .w �, t :.. ''.. ''fir». .'t • .k.. .', �,�,1 _ t", i�'� \` . ..I1 � --.. I I � ::. .." i�,,�'0�,":" <.? ., _.. - .` - • _-_ ... n �- '+.....� - . tit,.. t. .. v •'Yrn .I . I . . — I .1 . , —. .I �. , I 1, —-�. , . I-. I.w 1 , .*;!.., . . t i, ..yam , Y .,.�.'n s ti w 1 , +., ^ + '"^s.. , , �, wv-}, ' • "' . x y.;; ;: "�'."PH.gyw, 's., ",". $` 4 ` :,,, w... .., s..... . _ •• __ - ',+ r 1. ♦ x S e by M`f%sq t.t ;, p P,, 1,..� 1'`•-.. ,.. °, .1.. k `-,`*a"F^ .,,"� r }, >• aw ' '�" s'�y"?kat.:�,y', .tr•`*,k,��� , s ;;r 1 T`vl °v,' j .0 . -. , . " !F . O2 o ,- ,rI,(.1 . r -1/-/ .-.I. I1I .�,I . . /I. I. .II 1"I , .1-�I4.1- 4I--,.,I .X,-I-. I.I- I�i-.I. ./ ".� -, II I- -,- .1/II5/,--"II- ./ . - I I.I.�i.1I,nII , 4w,. �"..A-I��I I...- l�-/ I..I ,I1(" !� 1."1.",...,7, I -:/ "1 -.,I/-..,;,�I ,I I �,/ .., ,� -, --'-I.t. :I ..I. �<. ,-',1I�. .1- .. �/ . ,1��I7. .T./ ."I� .II I I,..,.. i,I -I ,�.:-/,� .I.I � 14 � I�I:�� .�I , ��, : , --.II 1.�..1I� � �11- ,-. ",�', - I -. ".1--,�.�"""�,�I11,/:�� "-�� "/�,.--J,-"I.�1,),,-1, 7,. "1��-.//,:"*.�-I.,;f-'. ,.- . ,�� ,� " 1:.-",, ,- "1�(-�-,<-�1iI,,,-,II I.:.�.,,.,. "� . ".I - . 4 ,..4"". t.,�.-'I/�,1".I,: E,'�-"P� "- ��,1,"1-I,-'/�1',1,11,I�.''� I�./I--,i1wI I I -. ,0I ..1 "" ��I-�,- ��/ �<�.,1. - III 11", -,� ,,. -,�,I- -'.I�-',�''1 t�,. 1�,,l', , �!r,.I",,..-,I tI � �,1�. "k���-�.I.- 1;.�.11 ,".111`�,,.-I. -,�4II1,I1D1.� '14-.,I 1��w,1..'1"��,1.�4L1"I, ���1 ,,�I zi-'4..t,!I"O-4-,i'1I"1,1"1- .1Ir,I',�I1 i,.�-�1i,",I ".. � 1�� 1II� I- "" , "I�,- ;�I-i ,� 11 "I -"I ,, �,,',tI-,-, .:,,1./�.P. I'. -� -I�-, -,, ;I I '--- -�-. -.-I.,1 ,-�I�",,�" :�1 ,-I.-11II/ , , -, ,I/ -�II-"-� -I I� 1�- E.,� , I �.11I-�1--_/-I -- ,,,,I 4IIl �<�z'1�!I-�� I,,�H"�-/I �;� �L-� ,,"�'-",.."iI",�� � ,-I I :I-"�;1II�,��",'��- "� -,,",.".,I!!�I,,".".,,-�?�,-��"",�����I,.4, 1'"",,,'�"�,'1'',�,,�IW;1t1,�,,"3"�'. ,'-f 1-!,itI�'-�I 1I..1,��"I",,"�- -,,".,,,,,n-,1/-,:,-,-,,I1,,,,-",��"��'-. ,�,f. �-�",,,.1,,�,"�,.1,��-.�,,,�-,;,,1�l"�I"�"",,�,1., -,,���"-",��,,,�I,�II"*,,,,�1"�'`/-,I ,I`,�,",'. "1,,II*,,,,," � ',��,'I,- I< I) 11I..-��:,.I,, ,. . ,I,I :�( �--`-,IIA I ,�� I,"� . �-..I � � ��) ., �5-�" "�11�/�I\1.- � 1,I1. II1 U N1-I �. 1.-- I F ,- iI I. :4-/ . .1Q /�4I /I , I k -I ..�I -:'/["�QVf��I., t I�" Ill;L1 I�-I ,�.JI5�.1 iI I,,. .. - !� _ ,r`-���� ""�, - ram+, '�...+ - ;a �f .., - - - II ,- k� . 1. III « ...... - �q , " � .�.' :. - - -. 4 - - - t - F - i ti «.r, _ i �Qrjr , F_ J c." - . l !" -IIIII�.-I�..-I i .� III .". � � I � 1.I�I,I .� �I, II .II�.,I,. I1I �11 - .,-. ,- .- ��., .-I II�II�'.1.- I,� II. .,I'I �-1,IiI II� 1.-I�--I II 1�I-� .� I�I- , � � ., 1Ij. IwI� , I.,, I 1II.Ii .. l. .CI I. . .I.II II I , ..II "-. I ,1 �, 1I .I.I ,�.,1, . . I� I. , I,I. �.I" '.I.�I. � 1� .I - ,� 1,.� %".,,".�.1;�1� ",'I .I.,411� , � 1 '11� ,. I .I..,":I"'�", , - 1 �,-..I�. , I . . ��I1I ,�I�� �1�.� ,- .�-.I ,: � . :�'." � I I . I e'�', ,�. I I � : I--. - �-I .I"�.I I,�I. �I I.. I..I�. I -� I,�, ,. I I , IZI- II' I ,.. I.I� �-1II.. "II��1. '�-, .I -11. ���,I: - ,.1I�t; ,. ..,� �I,�" .I'. -." 7,I-,.I . ,� " ,lI I �,I .I1,- I: . 1�� 1:,� II� I:, I1I11 :I, ; - { Y .} '' t ��--1 r - _ __ .-. f^c4rk." L i�.,r i»�..•..�:�•' -a //J), `�� - jj j((' -i :, '-! Y • - Y , . - . f IjGr. ,.I �.,. II : .. .I. I II I I I. "I .. III�I � ..�,.� I . .�I �.-I. , ,II I *, I<I . -1� .I.I.� . .. .1-..,1. � . . .'. .. 1I1, a'�.,-*..--"�I/ � /� .I � r .��II I1 -/ -�---"..4..1- �.�� I�I I .,1I- Ib .,4,1 , "I,I 1.,, ..- �� -/. .I I- . �-� . --"�.� .I� 1/�I�.I . I�. I., II ,I. -,I - .I , I . .. . I, . . 1 ' w `" . ,. ,)�'.I. �.I,�,I 4.II.,0 -�.I:. . .-I/ I�I/. , I1- -.. �IE/, -, . I II/.,I . ti . C' /1 t--- .1 i� ` 4` 1. � _ , t 1 L I Cy r { ,_,. ,..�..I.. � _ ' i` ". r ��. '" 11 I/ Jay.. 1*4�= '�rt�.'.y _ w ! p t �Ia" ey fs H} a v r - .. }j - - - I.pa L. Yi{ Y Y 3 Iry 'k . Y i Y .fit - ti,... 1 ". , . t , "�I�1, , lI�-,.�;"-A ,"�,l- ,f:�,-,"�,L��,,. ",,II� "�� , '-'IIN.-9::1,-,,."�,2Ii,.�- , I�1, �� , ,,� -I �1-*J.I',1,I ,III.�-" -�I� iR'�11-,-,1, .,O",I:�,-,t� .'1,,�I, r"1�,,,1� r)"c,,,�,�'._A1�, '" -I�1,-"��,� �"7-1�,. ,,.-�:;"�--I ,I":!�":-�,,1:1I�,*�-I .�"��'`I,� (�,�.',.t. "',' �,,1I,-�,".�,'�-.-1,��", - -•, . ., �W (J C "s "e n t . 5" ' r ,. . _.� O;'�. I�i"�I �-I�IIl�, :�-Il 111�1- I�11=U, t ". .-.1IZ I/,1>I 11 "I, -IFl..,(Q I ,,,,� : ' �Tt .. 1 ..I . ;I I... . .. .. �� . . I I II II �I T-I II II'II "� .. � �II =-1-'.M.�,-I I,.I1� . . �I-II3 �I �I, .-,I 10(I�0(I u , �� I �1/1= -�L-II� .I-i1.)I 1� , - I/ y1 il. C,IP �)--I-.--71� 4�- I,,)-L�I I - )4,:I (�. 71oI:-:-� 'P1:4� �,I -O �,-(i CI1L�")",Q ,41II -,-.,7 `- .r4 ,r ��.� .. I� 1-51' ?-�tt1I, I 'Q I ' 11 �..I - - -,Z.-I ,���P --.�" I.�f.'[, ,�- t'- C-I�-,- i--.-I �;.4" D,1 / �i-� . i /� '"";. _,� . / '��+.- ! ,e�:. r µPr. { tk �'•,w„r.,.., w,,,., ..J J -• `+z+. S ty`•...,e4w•+x. .+.:- k :') -? 3 k* : , �+"..' ;ljt - ..i _: r.,� -'r `r (y +jay `} !` + - ..'• - �4 ,/'� !' k f ,,f 4. M t,:a p k F.', t �. .._. _ .. F•'"yI4Y j t / * ' g . r. ,�.Jr;n ...'.tip. _ '!x F 3 - _ •I ( } I. //1 I. Yr �%�( 1 S ji.. . ♦ f 1., .. .. .. f )a 4` II I », . ,. . _ ' s . /'} - II II 1 ref, t, f,,_ t - I ^, t7 a -, // ' p 4{ ,' .._ _ ' \ y ./a, JF' J s' I. II II III II II _ /- // 1 '�� ! d.� ". ' ,� .'7 rb . � i E M I re! - 1. 4�+.' ! a 0 ., :" ,; ., .: .r . rf.�' Y �� ! 1 "^ - ,rw l f JJ11 z t . jY �y (� f 3'. ,. '� 1 s :�: S.,.JJ ;1...!'3.... A, ly `i N,,.hti,r..«.. ..� _ - x r� ��. s ro - ! r - - ! �. l' ��{� «� ,, i 4g �'� t:..�'' }� (J . lc r �' )' . art c., ,, ,. ; --I s Ht 'J (J r' , ` _ ` J+ r ,+ : vC" ,yyr N v t ✓ jrt. - 1 !._ / r .. { r .+ {f t i y ,�.�` ,/ s 7r,'; a ix) 7 J ` ,l .. ,,. a . l .? Yv. �' . .✓ A J t.. •+.«a.v.,. /` w �. t, a , �. f,. , t(, 1y(� r ,�+'` " ;.1 n, ,s ,r ' p.§t` �+ f`+ - i G✓ i/ _ a �.w +.. 1 "' �e...''s i . r, 7 : w: iY r - S "�l' >w '«�1 r s:-7 a } r ..�<�„ �,, <,, ,, , m,J ,..,. „-.:: .,. ,s. ../"' w' .. ._ .�. .., t x .Si. 'ea., : , '^'S, ,ri ,`'1 -'- i �I+p�y ,+t��F:w+w+w �� ..x y „y. „ .. r.+ { s4 l' 1 1�1 {; 55I , '. i f k43 �` C r'' ..t., '�, ,.ctr. * e t k. ' �,,.. a, ,..fa° F .,.-y... 'i3 e. . `�... .. ,S' i'. �, _.., ,,:. _. r.,„.t�„ . ^�,� 1 ,r ., .. ,:. ,ti . ... - ..„ ,-.. , ,.4. :r fit,_ ,y I.. - k' 1 '.w.. �r ...,�...,5 'o-. :,.. ,.•., f ' 3y 5�,. s, f .? f ./ p* . ,, ,, :, ., Y� i ,., , 5�� '"9 t .x.._„_ " r r .., i 1 t ` ,. r - / __ �" �, + x �. _ ,.., v Y `. -. 1 ".` I „ _ +� t f ...,, :. r.,. .� 3 - ._ - g. ,; "' . , _ _ ,., , ✓ _ . �, . ,.•� „ _ ,' ,,, . . , ,: 1 „ / . jj ,�µf W.., ;5 R . - �i:. ,. , .:, :...'�" '.3£'`'i r Na - ,.yw +,r2....... �1 AU I .., �� �/ - - ��, t5 + ,w r , /,xis r r .. .�" q )w « k «S. r'' C V+ 4Y ., . Y .; /' w " ll� .. t < s �.- fir,.. . ., ., '-., .r •.. .. f s� Ca ,. YF } .? .:x': ,... -.,>' .- ... ,� '�. ;, :... '`- ,�-• .x 1"�"#m f y. '�,. v" t c. k' ,. �, r.' f m �%� ... J ,r. -..- ,,.... „. ,-. - ., ., .. .xx � ,. �..f. , �. 4. �. . ' i r >* '^+ .�`'`.., r x - . ° �� /aM; ,' „, . „ �, �, L �• f .", ,.. v t� t .. „: :. , � K x r,f , . ` „,, � �t �. ,.� `� „,E , �.,,.,,, ;� L 2 . „I , 's .rt+: _ y.k. , > .,�.. > . s.,. _wf - • to ,. , ,'.:,': ..:. - ' - �,' ' „.. - A ! �' :;ti'> `V ` \ / `.. '.+.r • .i. --F 1 r�r•,y, ,% "ram \. st,P �,, >':, v ..., ^ t...,, i..: -� - - „ 4F ,x. - .. ,� ri _ YfI '.' �'"}(''J kf �. y y 'O ... ;' a •' ,y,- .•.„*.,'",' '„ 1' % ..k'+ihS �• f' - •'�S ��fSl+r ''k F,} Y: \~', o+rwj� it r. .. K 1I ,t; �'^� { f �1 ' / - {f y{TO . V �?. j } J y .. , .. „. ? \. " »s• J f.4 . ssi a', . ... 's . : - .. , +.a tt,, j, .w+r , a, - . . f . - . .. - .. . - - - - .. .: . , xy%. ,�fy� . . F `-,.^:, rc t :.,,`,C.' ` , :h '' ,°,::. " ' , ;1. vfi 'dw♦: Y£�h :: :. .. - Y »Ra+ .7n ,.,.. , ,,.,,.,,,.., y�, I `,i.y, '!"S '..ti t,�ww.. .. ,.� t '`. ',.;,., k. ti.5 x ,�`M` ,ax, ..'^..."`""""""` r+«,w.,:ir--'wn..wr...sa...w�,.+,a+u++•.._..-....,.,.e.arw�.r,„..+w+.........,.,.n•.,..r.r - r>• - . . ,l, 'mo t£ x„ , , �! r It ' �� .. `�. r I .+. J+,f.yj ., Jf f / . / j r �/ ,"�1, ��'I�%-:�,1,4�1"-,", ,:�"1��I ,-I :1i,5-�,,��i�-,� --,.:��,>M,'I 4,,-,-,-I , � i'',1-,�,�-,1,. �,, Y.fF ^^^"' ""SS i c, x y /f "tiJ� ! -.,. 4 `� . v; .. w .w-.^+.,^.w•-.,, - ......-.�.,.,.. f frrJ. ii { Ii fi`*,�" -..".. _ _ _ �, d' : 2 . •. , - f r ',,. .. I «,...._.•';.:.,,...-.-«.-«,:.,,.. ,,..,,,,., .^nr*^...'».+*maw-.w...w.+s• Rs i i . / / ;�• ". .yyr . } #i t jp�} j �r+� J� MJy t y ( � /q r I # � s� ` . ' - T w G; `_- %` I.. 1 :,, , , t 4 { J J j (° r j /� /� J� . •:. `•. .._ - - _ _ t'..:' .9w "P<x+.:« t,�,i+"*Y. 4...,,,� �'..t.•rY,. 1 1 i "'T'. ! .§ G.. '4ii..+'h' w - - . - .. . , ..� .:" _. - - v - _. - . - - - - - .. .. - .. .. . - Y J} �D ' F.M+Y .. _ .. 6! . , . F. .�: . ;- . v ' "- ---- ,. _. [:. :.-�`f 5' i �,... i 1'' 1.. t 4 f� i, ri.'.i t 1. _tJ: _..1.: • .'". . . , .. .....w«...« ,.. `. 'I, ;/ ' A . } . a''..,-- ". . . F _ . , , . - ' �1*,t .t� i t - r sit„ i ! '' i , ' --i.,, 1s . . ` .: . . .. _ - . . 1 r . t_. . ... _: . ; E w..y._.w,...,w„ , . 'vJ ,` w i s "" - CJ r : . r�1 F t �# . -7 i �`T i:.l .� a ° . . �. J-ir sw' 4r [. "" tw"t, _ d'.t �° C„Yt �s '` t'LJ Cr' +. -;, "' ! t / - �# ..� . �{.._ _ .- ;� t. . �- �. _ _ r ^:,:A -' w.. ` '" J ��rdd�� pg ��^''_'.,^.�+' ,rry wry ,F' ty, J"' I '' ,y+w'y Y �'' •io' irw�' -i M+u,E� S.rrr`.rvll y ti ",y {'+ .,Y - rnJ` . i6++ i" L6, Ytr f " : 6.t+.7 ` Zvt; . I f ., �."'y 11Ai .', i a * � Rrrrw' Y.,. *4+'�h.a; � . 1'�w� r,''�"�4 {� # „« L 4.,r 1 {'""•� j „5y ' F ,J # ..-,r J - r' . �:,w - .. - {.,.,,!• f-) F.{'.'i P �:.. F. r+r"`} �/,� �„„i � , t• "°x .: - ,fit �'� }! ' x,�- ,•y , `� •r - .: .1 -04S,7 '�iiJ' fE � �� ,..:. t ( "Via .._ �` a ,:� f : . ': - - , - M �..• _ ,,. 1 �,-. /�/;�-��- -�',1:I ,�1'"%�`I�-.,t. � 5 :�:�,,,,-`,`,i�.,.-,,�".`�,I�5.., I�; ,.�",'-.�.", �,,,�I, f./�,...",,1, �� ..o�,,,,`I/- -�.I.)�,,",I '\-(�-1I;,I I.;I., V�:04.,�I "� ,1,,*.�"D--I�-1�,"1I,- "--I.,-,7/" -'� ".:",.1��,�,,,--"�- �,, ,. ,-.\�- -A I`� �_",44 . �, -� m )".�-1""�,5,:".,v_.-,��" . l-,::l.-"�,,r"�',-, " -,I ,\ O-�" 1I-,�.....-,.,��I�,�,,1. 1.I �1I-.�.,I''��:, �,;1-z", I,,i�"��,-�,I, I � ;1- � ,,,',,�� ,�����1-�I,�,,;I-,I,'� -,1. "'` `"1 �11,. � �4,"`.. , v1,,.'�I, �Z4 ,1��i�, :,"'.,<.�,-..'Ii��, `�-�-,/ I I , ,",I - ,"I . ,,:"�"IqI 1""l`�.-��. I- �"�,�. �',",1�"� ,11I-', ,-`.1 �"� ,, % p"II -I V I I f7"fIfI I-/I,I / I -I , 1. '. I *-/I ��I 1(�4'. I I� b I �I4.II "z1'J (.I'1*I *�I1-)11I:. ,-I.�.I .�� �- ,/� ..I INI ' I Ix�. . 1 � r .- . . V_� :� ,......................._,�r,. . - - y , ..>,;, i . "i k. t 1/�"i s i.-TU , .. . . r r , r - .. .. .I .. � i %ie:1 H w 1 :- '� ,........� . .++, _ _ '__ +�,;� II �..` . ,.-.. iJ`,1 -: .~ .. .., _. - .. - ,. _. . ,. , _ aa. d&:d, .. ."I + - .. Y '- , 11 23X3tF FR4N7EC9C-1,-.7.:Q+-" CLVAV.P�I',NT - - .. - . ADO- 11-7--7 ,J-t-OSI(f4 pleeiutg�efvl tvc-M :�W� S.r ... - ,' �i' �� �;' . __...___r t �{ a �`~• , 4 156. 37 156, 22 r /'